The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About900826.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - JEFFERSON WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 12th day of September, 1990 , at the hour of 10: 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Joy A. Jefferson, 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110 , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 , 500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 hear) , and tack and feed store on the following described real estate , to-wit: Part o£ the _SE} of Section 32 , Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by R. Russell Anson, Attorney, and WHEREAS , Section 24 .4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 .7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section -24 .4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. 900826 f Page 2 RE: AMENDED USR - JEFFERSON c. The permitted uses will be compatible with the -existing surrounding land uses. d. The -permitted uses will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the -existing zone and with future development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan of the County and the adopted master plans of affected municipalities. e. The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve productive agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. f. There is adeamate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. NOW, -THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Meld County, Colorado, that the application for a -Site Specific Development Rlan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 ,500 cattle, horse boarding and training facility (15_0 head) , and tack and feed store on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2 . The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Held County Clerk and Recorder. 3 . Prior to exceeding the number of animal units allowed by right on the property, the applicant shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the Weld County Tealth pepartment has determined the facility to be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff_ Containment. 90-0826 Page 3 RE: AMENDED USR - J-EFFERSON 4. Within 43 -days of -approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems shall be performed and the required septic permits on the -existing systems shall be obtained. 5 . All cattle feeding operations shall -cease within six months and that portion of this Use by Special Review allowing cattle feeding shall become void under the following conditions: a) If substantial development occurs on property located within 1 ,000 feet of the Use by Special Review area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement or regulations; or b) If substantial development occurs within 1 ,0130 feet of the Use by Special Review area pursuant to building permits issued by Weld County and pursuant to a recorded final P.U.D, plan or final subdivision plat approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. c) "Substantial development" shall mean issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Town or County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 3 ,000 square feet of floor area. 6. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: the plat shall be amended to show an additional 20 feet of right-of wav reserved from the centerline of Weld County Road 74 . the signs on the property shall be brought into compliance with the requirements of Section 42 .2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7 . Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicants shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that an employee restroom approved by the Weld County Department of Health, has been provided on the site. 90-0826 Page 4 RE: AMENDED USR - JEFFERSON 8 . Notwithstanding the foregoing, the portion of the Use by Special Review authorizing cattle feeding shall become void on September 12 , 1995 . Applicant may reapply for a Use by Special -Review according to the then existing procedures for that use, without fee, on or before that date if applicant wishes to continue the cattle feeding operation. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of Septemher, A.D. , 19330 . M BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS ATTEST: eu�i7 WE COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board At/ir I� amt AYE Gene R. Brantner, Chairman _ — 6 c s C1 NAY ,) 144.� < „c c c G rge Kennedy, Pro-Te Deputy Clerk too the Board 02,�Ititi P4 YE APPROVED TO FORM: Constance L. Har ert EXCUSED C.W. I County -Attorney AYE 900826 I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS JOY A. JEFFERSON 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1 ,500 cattle) , horse toarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excess odors, flies or inspect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The Special Review permit site shall be maintained in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5 . Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers , empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 6 . An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust, if required. 7 . No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 900826 Page 2 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - JEFFERSON 8 . Wood shavings , sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris , and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 10 . The facility shall provide an employee restroom with toilets served by an approved septic sewer treatment system. 11 . The property shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements of Sections 45 and 47 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 12. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the describer) property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance or lease of the property to others for operation of the facility. 13 . The property shall be maintained in compliance with the signage requirements as set forth in Section 42 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 15 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 . 5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 16 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 .6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. _Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 900826 Page 3 RE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - JEFFERSON 18 . The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulation-s. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment -of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 19 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 900826 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AMENDED USR-735 JOY A. JEFFERSON 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to exceeding the number of animal units allowed by right on the property, the applicant shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the Weld County Health Department has determined the facility to be in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 4. Within 45 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, an ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems shall _be performed and the required septic permits on the existing systems shall be obtained. 5. Within 6 months of approval of a final PUD plan or final plat application by the Board of County Commissioners or the Town of Windsor, on property located within 500 feet of the use by special review area, the cattle feeding operation approved as part of Amended USR-735 shall cease and become void. 6. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: - the plat shall be amended to show an additional 20 feet of right-of-way reserved from the centerline of Weld County Road 74 and the elimination of all but one access onto the property. - the signs on the property shall be brought into compliance with the requirements of Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners, the applicants shall provide evidence to the Department of Planning Services that an employee restroom approved by the Weld County Department of Health, has been provided on the site. 9C.CFC3 I lII SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS JOY A. JEFFERSON AMENDED USR-735 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excess odors, flies or inspect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure -storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. The Special Review permit site -shall be maintained in compliance with the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment. 5. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 6. An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, for fugitive dust, if required. 7. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 8. Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed of in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 9. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 10. The facility shall provide an employee restroom with toilets served by an approved septic sewer treatment system. 11. The property shall have only one access to the property from Weld County Road 74. F r.er .2t f.. _..✓" Development Standards Joy A. Jefferson Page 2 12. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the requirements of Sections 45 and 47 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 13. The Special Review permit shall not be transferable to any successors in interest to the described property and shall terminate automatically upon conveyance _or lease of the Troperty others for operation of the facility. 14. The property shall be maintained in compliance with the signage requirements as set forth in Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 15. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the _Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. SCCrn 7 � , HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 90-27 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDED USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT - JOY A. JEFFERSON A public hearing was conducted on September 12, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Chairman Commissioner George Kennedy, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner C.W. Kirby - Excused Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Lanell Curry The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 2, 1990, and duly published July 12, 1990, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider a Site Specific -Development Plan and Amended Special Review Permit issued to Joy A. Jefferson for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. Commissioner Kirby excused himself due to a conflict of interest. Lee D. Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Mr. Morrison stated that, the fact that there are only four Commissioners available to vote, does not change the requirement that three Commissioners must vote in favor of the application in order that it be granted. Lanell Curry, representing the Department of Planning Services, read the unfavorable recommendation from the Planning Commission into the record. Ms. Curry said the vote for recommendation of denial passed on a vote of four to two. Mr. Morrison commented on the referral from the Windsor Planning Commission. He said the most recent letter indicates that at the re-hearing there was a tie vote on this matter. Mr. Morrison advised the Board to disregard any recommendation from the Windsor Planning Commission. He then addressed the issue of a possible conflict of interest Loncerning Commissioners Harbert and Brantner. The Secretary of State did submit letters of opinion confirming the position that full participation on the Board is appropriate. (These letters were marked as Exhibits J and K.) Ms. Curry submitted recommended Conditions of Approval and Development Standards if this request is approved. Russell Anson, Attorney representing the applicant, came forward to make his presentation to the Board. (Let the record reflect that during his presentation, Mr. Anson submitted Exhibits L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, and S. These Exhibits included photos of the area, and two letters from residents of the area in favor of this request.) Mr. Anson said Scott Jefferson, who operates the farm for his mother Joy Jefferson; and Albert Harding, manager of the feed-lot operation, are present to answer any technical questions which the Board may have. Mr. Anson said that Mr. Jefferson intends to conduct cattle feeding on the _property from January through May. He said Mr. Jefferson wishes to upgrade the facility, and anticipates that the requested operations will cease in five years. Mr. Anson commented on the annexation of property which adjoins this property and owned by the Ehrlichs, and the property was zoned PUD. Mr. Anson said this was a flag-pole annexation. He said as part of the approval for the PUD, the Town of Windsor entered into an agreement with the property owners about development of said property. Mr. Anson said that to date nothing has been done concerning the development of said property. At the conclusion of Mr. Anson's presentation, discussion followed concerning the proposed Conditions and Development Standards. Mr. Anson stated that there could be a potential problem with Condition #5 which states that the cattle feeding operation on this property shall 900826 /2_ ))4, Page 2 RE: CERTIFICATION - JEFFERSON cease within six months of approval of a final PUD plan or final plat application. Scott Jefferson came forward to make comments concerning this application. Albert Harding also made comments favoring this request. Others in favor of this request and coming forward to comment at this time were George Nelson and Larry Hartshorn. Bob Ehrlich, representing Amigo Farms, spoke in opposition to this. Mr. Ehrlich said many things have changed in this area since this feedlot was first built. He said development in this area is scheduled to take place in the near future. Mr. Ehrlich said that the engineering and ponding necessary to bring the feedlot into compliance with the existing standards will be very costly, and he feels it would be better if the applicant applied such monies toward the horse boarding facility. Mr. Ehrlich made comments concerning future industrial development. In response to a question from Commissioner Lacy, Mr. Ehrlich stated that he feels people would prefer to live next to a large industrial building rather than live in the area of a feedlot. Mr. Ehrlich then answered questions asked of him by Mr. Anson. Craig Harrison, representing Harrison Resource Corporation, and Stan Liss, manager of Amigo Farms, came forward to state their opposition to this application. (Mr. Harrison submitted Exhibit T, a copy of Phase 2 concerning a proposed PUD on his property.) Mildred Nelson came forward to make comments in favor of this application. Mr. Anson made his final statements. Again discussion was held concerning Condition #5. Mr. Ehrlich came forward and stated that he is concerned about the Board discussing the Conditions, and said that he is getting an inference of approval. He said, in his opinion, the Board should take a vote on this matter before the issue of Conditions is addressed. Mr. Morrison explained why such discussion is appropriate at this time. He said Conditions and Development Standards may be considered for inclusion in a motion to make this proposed use compatible in the event this application is approved by the Board. Let the record reflect that a recess was called at this time, with Chairman Brantner requesting that Mr. Morrison work with the Planning staff on re-wording Condition #5. Upon reconvening, discussion was held concerning Condition #5 as re-worded. Mr. Ehrlich made further comments at this time. The Board then discussed proposed amendments to the Conditions and Development Standards. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve Amended USR for Joy Jefferson with the Conditions and Development Standards to read as discussed. Commissioner Lacy then read the criteria necessary for a USR. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. Commissioner Brantner said he feels the operation should be reviewed in five years regardless of whether development has occurred or not. (Tape Change #90-34) Commissioner Kennedy made comments and said he will vote against the motion. Commissioner Lacy moved to amend his motion to state that the portion of the cattle feeding operation shall terminate in five years, if the applicant wishes to continue such operation he must reapply and obtain approval from the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners with the application fees to be waived at that time. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Commissioner Lacy moved to amend Condition #5 to add that the cattle feeding operations will cease within 6 months and that portion of the USE allowing cattle feeding shall become void under the following conditions. ., and also to insert the word "recorded" before final PUD plan, and also insert the word "subdivision" between final plat. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion, and it carried with Commissioner Kennedy voting nay. Commissioner Lacy called for the question. The motion to approve the amended USR for Joy Jefferson, subject to the Conditions and Development Standards as voted on and amended carried with Commissioner Kennedy voting nay. 900826 Page 3 RE: CERTIFICATION - JEFFERSON This Certification was approved on the 17th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: i / �I BOARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: LI@ �' V WELD TY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk to the Board ene R. Brantner, airman C-$Y�1�lTLn2.c• Vic. —' Deputy Clerk to he Board Ge ge Ken edy, Pro Tem �� . onst nce L. Harbe t -4?ry C.W. Kir y GortWe �acy!`l 1/.. j V TAPE #90-33 & #90-34 DOCKET #90-27 PL0050 900826 ATTENDANCE RECORD September 12 . 1990 PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOCKET # 90-27 Jefferson, Special Review Permit DOCKET # 90-32 City of Longmont, Change of Zone DOCKET # 90-34 Flatiron Structures/Azalea Farms, Change of Zone NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING ' L<s gala✓'8(3 1/1 -7 ti I Li C 12_4t 7C/ to-,r8'Z-7 ,rni ' �7((,� /0<x 9-a 0,0Q, Sir- 1 `/D 31-1 11a .Z� i, Po asx Qa 3? ton- nten7 co Ens 3.4 `7)—3 I Ar _ a_ so-., 4 ,4,,,_ �r S ) ,-s-/_3-S�,„, "�S G_ 6,-,6 A-7(,, �, , (c7 C16)-,9 i eA L � gel r )x_t)-6 0,Anc��a DR 1%0/ (?a -7 .- kL/�FFl:K5c � 3 S oltivP7 iv /.,v ,-valisctin of 90 z7 101117())2.6?‘—q-y� >� �yCS .-7E1 �G( /��vL. / /92-ir-PP7�P/ , �/7U 7 1. i /�h x-d.- Y IJlii n) /1 .� 13 i)2 F 72 - iT. `O//n3 / 90 - A ? E6/v>n tiVa L r 07,L'„ (� 4 ,...3 us__,- -- , -7- y _ i- - y a - -, 7 : Irt: �3 STATE OF COLORADO ) )s. s. COUNTY OF WELD ) David B. Reynolds, being duly sworn , says that he is publisher of The New News , a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continously and uninterruptedly published therein , during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed PUBI,Ir.tiorlc� notice; that said newspaper is a The. Dolor of °f co„nt;yyy condit2one11 nptemberd 72,099(1, newspaper within the meaning of the �n�i �Yel dper�P�,,a s;te act of the General Assembly of the for the gse�gPec AnAan State of Colorado, entitled "An Act 8escrtbediow ar'd p°use t o regulate thelegalveers r�°V Pr�rt s�plan�R��sn al printing o f ii:&68;;;:a7:11J- amendments �ah pursuant tonotices and advertisements, " and � a per;odCoR.seeamendments thereto; that the noticed1o9ew feffe :( �of which the annexed is a printedO0`f Colorado/ 1tIPT1ON: Part ofcopy taken from said newspaper, wass� ��'f�stnpublished in said newspaper, and in A1vD orado the regular and entire issue of co�fPR0VEb u�gNE�E'VSMY of eaPuc),°enf �ratz°n (1,50 every number thereof , kik�k srra asg s (150 hen ), and ` more o��PARCEL: 2] acres, once a week for I Facture t°abide b successive weeks; that said notice �nne`f0t13ortu of re�ovalewttt was so published in said newspaper property risk. °f vested BOARD OF proper and not in any supplement wELp��MM�sS��,po1vgg thereof , and that the first WELDDOCOA'DW. WARD�FDR publication of said notice as p� By, Tommie e�THEB R CLERIC ED aforesaid , was on the •in N Dewsptemberr pyy� --'` day o f -.,1�� ,r--'f 19 °/ I —� —� and the last on the 1C day of... ..-.. ,/,-L' .--C /-. - f- - 4 / j Subscribed and sworn to before me this a�O ‘4 day of _.Hiy7/z,,,, e-L 199e) . J L�-i-J 7,- o-�V.44 ,c T`•�-,-,_) Sr`C.)5:7,-..1% - My C0M MiSSin7 0, !!(.',S k.i rch 15.1(7- � ------ -- ------ July 12, 1990 . . _. NOTICE — Stale la teColobiadonlandLfl a Weld County Zoiting Ordinance,q"othlic rs «Bte of County Commissioners of Weld County Colotado, Weld Cpmmp Centennie� Center, 915 10th Street, First t+Timee specified. �peers o, in the manner interested ceio onethe Site - Snacific DeveloReview pment Plan and S quest Perndt are heard. to attend and maY be Should the applicant or any interested party desire the ;presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings in addition to the taped record ghich will be kept during the eering the Clerk to the Board's Office s1ieB be advised in writing of such adage at least Rve days prior to the hearing. The coat of engaging�ta ccpourt re rt�shhaall be borne by ttBeEzt IT mope awer��iy. 7K tid County Planing Commleaion may be waunined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the ' 9 5eld 1�3r ce,`"Tda�l Cr ; Greeley.Colorado. APPLICA 9 Joy NT: A. Jefferson: 05 Martin Lune, Englewood, Colorado 80110 DATE: July 214990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. Specific Development Plan and S' al Review Permit Livestock confinement oper horse ation (1,500(1,500 -taand ck feed awe head) and .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the pSE1/4 of Section 8$ Tovmetao P M. We1daenuot7y Cooredow bth LOCATION: West of State Co�ty$7Road744;ad cent t W� Town of Windsor BOARD OF COUNTY COOB14S4IONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO BY; DONALD�D.WARDEN _...79-2a-Lt-r- TO THE BOARD BYYS�heBy Miller Deputy DATED: July 2,fNe Published t The New News July _ - 12.1990. /q ��jj 2 `f NOTICE OF ?UBLIC HEARING The__Weld County Conimission will hold a p�c ;rinkhearing on Tuesday June 5, 1880 a.m. for the purSppaseec ar Devel ent a Plane anQ fain amended Special Review permit STATE O F COLORADO °r openy described below. Approvear of the request may create a vested property right S S . pursuant to Jefferson COUNTY OF WELD ) LE 3E14��a-iIO :32i,�fof theR67W of the 6th P.M., Weld Colin Colorado PROPOSED INTENSITY OF USE: Livestock Confinement Operation (miaximun, 1—)11' U 1 p 6, 1. .-,,_ 1,500 head catfle) horse boarding i��6/;(--.5e i ng and training facility (maximum ' 150 head)) and feed and tack store dully sworn, says t h he/she is LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Windsor; west of State highway publisher of the New News, a weekly 257 north of Weld County Road 74 '' SIZE: 20.5 acres,more or less dp. newspaper published in Keenesburg The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioner's in said County and State; that said Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 . newspaper has a general circulation Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to in said County and has been c o n t i n- the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld ously and uninterruptedly }published County Depamient of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Roo„ t h e r i n during a period of at least 342 Greeley, Colorado 60631 before the above date or presented fifty-two consecutive weeks prior at the public hearing on June 5, to the first publication of the " ' �a,�es of the application in.-.. annexed notice; that said newspaper ;.41able for public ,pla�g • is a newspaper within the meaning ,,e es, Roz>�t►g.'W9115d Ten ,ice, Room of the act of the General Assembly Stipet, • • oGreeleyen Colorado 60631 • Phone-356 4000 Extension 4400• of the State of Colorado, entitled Ernie Ross,Ch liming Common Weld County Plain the New News "An Act to regulate the printing To bepubbl� one (I) time by i:. of legal notices and advertisements, " To be New News nay and amendments thereto that the p,1990. d ID The 10.1990. notice of which the annexed is a , printed copy taken from said news- �< paper, was published in said news- paper, and in the regular and entire issue of every number thereof, t: r once a week for successive week( s) ; that said notice was so r published in said newspaper proper and not in an y su I. pplement thereof, and that the first publication of said notice as aforsaid , was on r` the 1 0 day of If) Gc._ `.:. .. 19 `l L , and the last of the `i b cr.:5: \-C\,O1 .A: --t4)---, V/7-2 y 4/ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ;a: C� - /4 _ day of y /�1-t"- e',��...4.r.._..--- +` t► :, lf% .�r.. 1 199d t7.1.1- Ai'•••7 , iiiii: jUN ' -,- 1 , • Weld Ch• PIA;1.,,4x uniliadcxlio • __ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) StIS . COUNTY OF WELD ) C '' J � *WI �J. � /V { e i ng dully sworn, say • t t lie/she is publisher of the N [Jews, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg is ,` in said County and State; that said �.. newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been contin- ously and uninterruptedly published (;� therin during a period of at least ,°�We� PUBItCHEARING fifty-two consecutive weeks prior hC dTp l�uae9 { to the first publication of the eo :¢g` g` ihe p��i� annexed notice; that said newspaper a�nieitded SpeciaP Review pern� • is a newspaper within the meaning fAvp v�`° `lyt � °may create a vested Property right of the act of the General Assembly pursuant to Colorado Law. of the State of Colorado, entitled APPLICANT A.Jefferson of LEGAL D "An Act to regulate the printingtl,e sE1M of section 32, T7N �ty,Coloraedo8� P.M., Weld of legal notices and advertisements , " Typg ANA INTENSITY OF PROPOSED US USE: (Maven it and amendments thereto that the Confinement Ope notice O£ which the annexed is a a d ttraining ffacility`s(n noarolus �. printed copy taken from said news- IAdaNdfe dfa �� °'e !`' Town of Windsor; west of State paper, was published in said news- cotytoaa7�a north of Weld �, paper, and in the regular and entire S1ZE: J 26.5 acres,more or leas issue of every number thereof, The public hearings m6issiiooners the eld County r;. gearing Room, r irat Floor, Weld i County Centennial Center, 915 t,' Tenth Street. Greeley. Colorado. once a week for successive �onmienta or obJ actions related to j the above request should 6e i week( s) ; that said notice was so aubniltted to wnting to the Weld County Depe rhnen g Plennin8 r,' published in said newspaper proper se ,sea, 9I5 Tenth street, Room 3Q Greeley, Colorado 80831 j'� and not in any supplement thereof, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on June 5, �. and that the first publication of 1990. Said notice -a s a f o r s a i d, w a s on Copies of the blip inspection,in l'?: , available for p InsPe the Department of Planning ,,. Services Room 342, Weld County f': the day of ' \ ._1 , �t,Gr�JeynColorado _11th ii Phase-398-/000, Extension 4400. f.>; Commission 19 ill) , and the last of the -.S Gi New News WA in -d li of `k._ 19 `I 0 J y' - �y Ll ;: k, Subscribed and sworn to before me this G;i M.. . v3i1e( _ day of b..Z4�.L is 19 9v a`: � ?. 5/>Licit ./ //,;..-7.c,‘,..624_.._,_ c---p Cr 0. � j] , ,;UN 1 1990 .iti�� i WEII) CO. Plpilmme firnetk4n! '.' --,-- - NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 90-27 Joy A. Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, Colorado 80110 DATE: July 25, 1990 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: DONALD D. WARDEN CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Shelly Miller, Deputy DATED: July 2, 1990 PUBLISHED: July 12, 1990, in The New News tr.. v (fit\fr: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 ik COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, at 10:00 a.m, for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Livestock Confinement Operation (maximum 1,500 head cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head) , and feed and tack store LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Windsor; west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74 SIZE: 20.5 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on June 5, 1990. • Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News To be publishe ne (1 timrb May 10, 1990 Received by: I/ � Date: (CJ (Ye -n - 1 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case #Amended USR-735 for Joy A. Jefferson in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 5 the day of May 1990. C\e,cc\ PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF TIME T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS -IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, at 10:00 a.m, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: Livestock Confinement Operation (maximum 1,500 head cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head), and feed and tack store LEGAL: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of -Windsor; west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74 For more information call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 Cerfn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES -OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # ypends R 7;rj THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: " \+OTRY ,SS NAME OF PERSON POST SIGN was ;`,, 'U [, LAC le? S 0 SI OP f.0� STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELT ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO 3 EFORE ME THIS SAY OF p�1,_t-,111,_'\,_,\_19 q,cp . SEAL RE,lSr..*a CDVoCA My C�id� Expiwlsb• 13, 1993 N �1RY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE I HEREBY -CERTIFY UNDER THE P_ENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY SHE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED DN THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE # t,-1S R- 7 35 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: Sao f{ Scalivso O.TARY `; NAME OF PERSON -POSTING SIGN !JD t-<<'' n �,0�°CC.' SIG 'RE 0 _PLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS Vic' DAY OF A. a 19 wo SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC MY -COMMISSION -EXPIRES LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 19 Sr r C',.n a "SUBSTANTIAL _DEVELOPMENT" Alternative 1 Substantial Development shall mean completion and final approval of a foundation for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area; construction and approval of internal roads serving the P.U. D.; and completion of water taps to the structure . Alternative 2 Substantial Development shall mean issuance of a Ot Certificate of Occupancy by the Town aye County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area. 9 CONDITION All cattle feeding operations will cease if substanti-al development occurs on the adjacent property pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved development master plan and utility plan as required by the Town of Windsor Annexation Agreement. i E °tool � CAA r‘ra CONDITION All cattle feeding operations will cease and that portion of a//ow;n Caff�e frrdrn�q &ha// this U. S .R.lbecome void under the following conditions : a) If substantial development occurs within 500 feet of the U.S.R. area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master Plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement Dr regulations; or b) If substantial development occurs within 500 feet of the U. S. R. area pursuant to building permits issue-d by Weld County and pursuant to a final P. U.D. plan or final plat -approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners . Y 4.4.4 'lit rroc ` n T "SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT" Alternative 1 Substantial Development shall mean completion and final approval of a foundation for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area; construction and approval of internal roads serving the P.U. D.; and completion of water taps to the structure . Alternative 2 Substantial Development shall mean issuance of a JI Certificate of Occupancy by the Town and County for a residential structure or for a commercial or industrial structure with greater than 5000 square feet of floor area. Vo64 *� t Jacob H. Stromberger Harold J. Stromberger 9910 Hwy 392 Windsor, CO 80550 August 27, 1990 Town of Windsor - 301 Walnut Street Windsor, CO 80550 To whom it may concern: As concerned citizens and members of the agricultural community, we are in favor of letting the feedlot on Weld County Road 74 continue to operate. The cattle fed in this lot utilize the feed that farmers in this area produce: such as corn, hay and other feed products. This is of great benefit to the surrounding farmers and to the community at large. Farmers have a local outlet for their feed products and this brings income to both the farmers and the businesses in the cornnuniLy. Therefore, we feel that if the feedlot is not allowed to operate, the agricultural community and the business community of Windsor will suffer. Sincerely, /�� eye f�'/ eizre1971-tn b H. Stromberger Harold J. Stomberger JHS/HJS:sjg S`yi/0 f -Aage., EXn,H��IBIT • rcn p� # e 1:3 'n * ADMINISTRATION 894-2200 CORPORATIONS 894.2251 ELECTIONS 894-2211 * X876** LICENSING& ENFORCEMENT 894-2214 DEPARTMENT OF STATE LOBBYISTS NATALIE MEYER 1580aroadway—Suite 200 REGISTRATION 894-2211 Secretary of State •- Denver 80202 NOTARIES PUBLIC 894-2215 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 894-2243 September 4, 1990 Gene R. Brantner Weld County Commissioner PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Advisory opinion per CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Dear Mr . Brantner : CRS 24-18-111 authorizes the Secretary of State to Issue advisory opinions to persons subject to the provisions of CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Please be advised that the opinion which Is given is advisory only. Also be advised that the response made will be part of a public file, however your name and address will be deleted to protect your privacy. Your question is whether the fact that Mr . Anson, a former employee of the County and chair of the Republican party will be presenting a zoning application for a Use by Special Review presents a conflict for your voting on the proposal given than Mr . Anson is responsible for publishing a brochure concerning Republican candidates for the up-coming election. The standard for interaction on a board Is stated in CRS 24-18-109(3)(a) which prohibits a member from voting and from attempting to influence the other members of the body If the official has a substantial financial interest in the undertaking. This section clearly requires disclosure of the conflict and restraint from voting and from participating in the discussion surrounding the vote. CRS 24-18-109(3)(b) carves out an exception for voting only to assure that the governing body is able to conduct Its business. Since the standards of section (a) are specifically referenced in section (b) , the member would be able to vote only if the participation is necessary to obtain a quorum or otherwise enable the body to act. The member would not, however , be able to participate in the discussion if the conversation attempts to influence the decisions of the other members of the governing body In voting on the matter . CRS 24-18-110 requires that the board member disclose his interest in the matter before the board. That disclosure must Include the amount of his financial interest , purpose and duration of his services, and compensation received. The first question Is whether having information published in a brochure is a substantial financial Interest In a matter before the board. The benefit to J 774V9() you from the Republican party in this matter Is minimal ; the only concern would be whether an unfavorable ruling would influence the content of the information or result in the omissLon of your bio from the brochure. However , I assume that mechanisms are In place to assure that your candidacy is treated fairly. I do not believe the benefit to you from the Republican party is direct enough to consistute a substantial financial Interest If you vote on this matter . Clearly, if the concerns raised in the letter to thls office are disclosed to the Board prior to the matter being presented, then the disclosure will serve to remove any possible appearance of conflict even though no actual conflict exists. Full disclosure of the situation should be considered not only properly abiding by the ethical standards required by statute but also refraining from even an appearance of impropriety. Then, full participation in the matter before the board should be appropriate. I trust the above answers your question. If you have further questions, please feel free to write for clarification. Iy. Natal ! Meyer Secr ary of State C &41 �OF Op�O /F� ?7O'.. N O'. * �I �� - * ADMINISTRATION 894-2200 CORPORATIONS 894-2251 rt ELECTIONS 894-2211 /876%" LICENSING& ENFORCEMENT 894-2214 DEPARTMENT OF STATE LOBBYISTS NATALIE MEYER 1560 Broadway—Suite 200 REGISTRATION 894-2211 Secretary of State Denver 80202 NOTARIES PUBLIC 894-2215 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 894-2243 September 4, 1990 Constance L. Harbert Weld County Commissioner PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Advisory opinion per CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Dear Ms. Harbert: CRS 24-18-111 authorizes the Secretary of State to Issue advisory opinions to persons subject to the provisions of CRS 24-18-101 , et seq. Please be advised that the opinion which is given Is advisory only. Also be advised that the response made will be part of a public file, however your name and address will be deleted to protect your privacy. Your question is whether the fact that Mr . Anson, a former employee of the County and chair of the Republican party will be presenting a zoning application for a Use by Special Review presents a conflict for your voting on the proposal given the$ Mr . Anson Is responsible for publishing a brochure concerning Republican candidates for the up-coming election. The standard for interaction on a board is stated in CRS 24-18-109(3)(a) which prohibits a member from voting and from attempting to influence the other members of the body if the official has a substantial financial interest In the undertaking. This section clearly requires disclosure of the conflict and restraint from voting and from participating in the discussion surrounding the vote. CRS 24-18-109(3)(b) carves out an exception for voting only to assure that the governing body is able to conduct its business. Since the standards of section (a) are specifically referenced In section (b) , the member would be able to vote only if the participation is necessary to obtain a quorum or otherwise enable the body to act . The member would not , however , be able to participate in the discussion If the conversation attempts to Influence the decisions of the other members of the governing body In voting on the matter . CRS 24-18-110 requires that the board member disclose his Interest in the matter before the board. That disclosure must include the amount of his financial Interest , purpose and duration of his services, and compensation received. The first question Is whether having information published in a brochure Is a substantial financial Interest In a matter before the board. The benefit to Pc cc,- OO11 you from the Republican party in thls matter is minimal ; the only concern would be whether an unfavorable ruling would influence the content of the information or result In the omission of your blo from the brochure. However, 1 assume that mechanisms are in place to assure that your candidacy is treated fairly. I do not believe the benefit to you from the Republican party is direct enough to consistute a substantial financial Interest If you vote on this matter . Clearly, If the concerns raised in the letter to this office are disclosed to the Board prior to the matter being presented, then the disclosure will serve to remove any possible appearance of conflict even though no actual conflict exists. Full disclosure of the situation should be considered not only properly abiding by the ethical standards required by statute but also refraining from even an appearance of Impropriety. Then, full participation in the matter before the board should be appropriate. I trust the above answers your question. If you have further questions, please feel free to write for clarification. nc= y, Natali Meyer Secretary of State ., Cfr)> x �U of `Wln or' ', � ro � °t 1„, ft * 11411 I it, it WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 TELEPHONE: (303) 686-7476 September 11 , 1990 Ms. Lanell Curry Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amended USR-735 Joy A. Jefferson Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, at their regular meeting September 6 , 1990, reconsidered the above mentioned Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit. After hearing testimony from those in attendance, the Planning Commission' s motion to approve the horse training and boarding facility excluding the cattle feeding operation resulted in a tie vote. A subsequent motion to approve the project contingent upon compliance with the Weld County ' Planning Department ' s conditions of approval also resulted in a tie vote. The Windsor Planning Commission therefore has no recommendation for either approval or denial. If you have any questions, please give me a call . Sincerely, TO N OF WINDSOR / \ y� 7 /) 14 net E. Lathrop t, jel "Planner Of r- '.s R. RUSSELL ANSON ATTORNEY AT LAW ? J THE LAW BUILDING CI , TO lit-14. • 1101111TH AVENUE P.O. BOX 326 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 (303) 353-5508 TELECONIER. (303) 356.1111 August 14, 1990 Janet E. Lathrop Windsor Planning Commission 301 Walnut Windsor, CO 80550 Re: Case Number Amended USR-735 Dear Planning Commission: Be advised that this office represents Joy and Scott Jefferson concerning their application for an Amended USR-735 . This letter is in response to your letter of August 8, 1990 and concerning the Planning Commission meeting of August 2, 1990 . In reviewing the letter from Janet Lathrop and the enclosed "unofficial minutes" it is my opinion that the action of the Windsor Planning Commission concerning the Jeffersons ' case is a substantial violation of Jeffersons ' right to procedural due process and thereby a violation of 42 USC Sec. 1983 . See Sclavenitis v . Cherry Hills Board of Adjustment, 751 P.2d 661 (Colo. App. 1988 ) whereunder the Board of Adjustment of Cherry Hills Village took additional testimony and evidence subsequent to its formal hearing and based upon that evidence denied the property owners application. As I understand it, the Jeffersons ' case was not even on the agenda but was added at the request of Mr. Ehrlich without any type of notice to the property owners, the Jeffersons . I am also concerned about some of the statements that were made to the Windsor Planning Commission that were not based on any factual evidence. Most of the concerns would be answered by development standards proposed by the Weld County Planning Services if the Board of County Commissioners approves the Jeffersons ' de application. Ehrlichd v decision has significant impact on the decision d t of the yBoard oof County Commissioners. By reversing your decision without notice to Mr. Jefferson you have violated the Jeffersons ' civil rights under 42 USC Sec. 1983 . Demand is herein made upon you to Baron Janet Lathrop Windsor Planning Commission August 14, 1990 Page Two rescind the action of your August 2, 1990 meeting and that you withdraw the August 8, 1990 letter submitted to the Weld County Board of ty Commissioners. Very truly urs, // s son torney at Law RRA:yd pc: Scott and Joy Jefferson C)('�- ;.> CONDITION �/ b✓Iln ` Arri All cattle feeding operations will cease and that portion of a//ow:n eatflc fcrr(ioyy Shall n this U. S.R. 'become void `hnder the following conditi • A D n pf /1,02/ a) If substantial development occurspwithin img'6ifeet of the U. S. R. area pursuant to building permits issued by the Town of Windsor and pursuant to an approved Development Master Plan and Utility Plan and approved final plat as required by the Town of Windsor annexation agreement or regulations; or PAAtwXa "14 b) If substantial development occursAwithin 500 feet of the U. S. R. area pursuant to building permits issued by Weld County and s u / pursuant to a final P.U.D. plan or final plat approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners . 4 V., DC—. �. � • REALTY CO. COLORADO, WYOMING, and NEBRASKA REALTORS TELEPHONE (303) 352-1212 DENVER METRO 573-1672 12128th AVENUE GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 April 19, 1984 County of Weld, Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 GENTLEMEN: On behalf of my client, IntraWest Bank of Greeley, I submit this application for Recorded Exemption. This total parcel is approximately 76.2 acres, the proposed larger parcel will consist of approximately 51 acres of farmland. While the smaller parcel will represent approximately 25 acres consisting of two houses, numerous scales, outbuildings, storage sheds, approximately 2,500 head feed lot and feeding equipment. I have a party willing to complete the sale of the larger parcel and several interested in the 25 acre parcel without the farmland. Both parcels will continue to be operated by agricultural users through separate ownership. All prospective bLlvers have indicated a willingness to accept one parcel as a feed lot and the other for farmland use. and have indicated the whole unit economically unfeasible. This proposal is consistant with the County Comprehensive Plan and the Windsor Overlay District as it will take no agricultural land out of production while allowing the smaller parcel to continue at its present and best use. As per my discussion with Rick Lessner of the Town of Windsor Planning Department, this parcel will not affect efficient and orderly development. IntraWest Bank of Greeley owns approximately 82 acres Contiguous to the north of this parcel . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stiitae_A. -ri\`-R,L,a.A___ Patrick L. McNear Realtor Farm and Ranch Division z EXHIBIT r PLM/cmf it enclosures R;C';O_i _6 B 1101 REC 02040926 01/29/66 12: 2U $9. uu 1/uus F 0309 'ARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK F RECORDER WELD CO, CO /4.;. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this I0 day of Tpfilat , 1985 , by and between the TOWN OF WINDSOR, an/incorporated Colorado municipality, hereinafter referred to as "the Town, " and AMIGO FARMS INC. , NORTHERN FRONT . RANGE_ FARMS INC. , and ROBERT E. . .. . EHRLICH, hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners" or "Developers" ; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Property Owners have submitted a petition for the annexation of certain property to the Town, and such annexation has been designated as the Windsor North Annexation; and WHEREAS, the Town expressed its intent to annex that certain real property known as the Windsor North Annexation by resolution passed by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Windsor on May 13, 1985; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation complies in all respects with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 ; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to approve and accept the petition for annexation and to annex the Property Owners ' land to the Town of Windsor; and WHEREAS, by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties desire to establish zoning districts and requirements for the subsequent subdivision and development of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, for the benefits to be derived by each and in exchange of the mutual covenants and performances of the parties hereto, IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The Town agrees that, upon the annexation of the property, Tract A thereof comprising 293 . 382 acres of the Windsor North Annexation shall be zoned Planned Unit Commercial/ Development Industrial) in accordance with any present or subsequently adopted land use plan of the Town, and that Tract B comprising 448 . 244 acres of the Windsor North Annexation shall be zoned Planned Residential Development (PD-R) . The Developers agree that they shall not seek. the approval of, and the Town shall not approve, any residential development in the Windsor North Annexation Commercial/ until at least ten per cent ( 108) of the PUD Industrial) portion of the annexation, referred to above as Tract A, has been fully developed. The term "developed" shall be defined as public improvements required by the Town pursuant to applicable ordinances and resolutions, together with EXHIBIT ^ 0T _ v , , °AO H 1101 REC 12040926 01/29/86 12: 20 $9.00 2/003 • F 0310 MAR ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & REL ,RDER WELD CO, CO J • completed construction of improvements for the uses ommetla permitted within the PUD (Industria ) Zone. Parking area • in excess of the minimum required by the Town for any completed improvement shall not be included as developed property. • 2 . The Town agrees that, subject to the provisions of this paragraph, the Windsor North Annexation may continue to be used for hunting purposes . The ,term "hunting" shall be defined as the present level of such activity existing upon the ground known as the Windsor North Annexation, and any modification thereof shall cause this right to be immediately extinguished in the sole discretion of the Town. It is understood that the Windsor North Annexation is divided into four separate parcels numbered 1 through 4 . Upon the issuance of the first building permit for any development upon the Annexation, the hunting rights on the parcel for which the building permit has been issued shall be immediately and absolutely extinguished. In addition, should the application for a building permit call for the location of a structure within a 600-yard radius of an adjoining parcel, hunting shall likewise be extinguished upon that portion of the adjoining ' parcel within the 600-yard radius . 3 . Prior to or contemporaneously with any application for the development of the Windsor North i Annexation, the Developers shall comply with each of the following specific requirements: a. Submit and obtain approval of a master plan in conformance with the applicable provisions of the Code of the Town of Windsor. , b. Submit and obtain approval of a utility plan which shall include the exclusive utilization of Town water and sewer services for all develenmPat 4 . Prior to the submission and approval of any subdivision development in the Windsor North Annexation, the Developers agree that they shall, at their expense, cause a petition for annexation to be filed with the Town to annex those portions of County Roads 13, .15, 74, and 76 and State Highway 257 as may be impacted by the proposed subdivision development. The determination of which roads shall be impacted, thereby requiring annexation, shall be within the sole discretion of the Town. 5 . This Agreement shall be a covenant which runs with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and that this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, personal -2- r'i 0 ) __ B 1101 REC 02040926 01/29/86 12: 20 $9. 00 3/003 F 0311 MAI ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RE 3DER WELD CO, CO �( representatives, successors, and assigns, the same is made and entered into the day and year first written above. TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO p • /,447 - in/f -- / 4•46.•ATTEST Ar,,-,✓� lGoCKC BY ayor ai ,� oow Clerk • 9 SEAL : AMIGO N g‘/Li/1 ...ATT O. Pr 'dent 4°b OR 1st() • Secretary NORTH: ONR d� / FARM N�� BY 44/ ATTEST: Pr.sident Secretary • -3- PCO '"53 1 / a 901 h J e n .1° 1 4 7 T'�"� .7 olio • '.T'1 p1D-11 �I TiWnIpeasi, `— .; P. l a9]6ll 16/ •�• 49.25 / t\ 1 I, ♦900 i /' I , :i 4�0 V6BM 7i '\ / 5 1°1is )1_ �...\ .J, \ II` t a44...:.. c 1 i 1 l .a ^1 ° I • /° 1 46671 , 613 6690 .. � 1 Lake.Canal:; �7t� Roo`No 1+'` Pit o t. ( 1 V. i l i I } 'lo � � / r • 7. 8 — N N. J �:. 9 a 10 ` 1 - I 'li tcs 1065 `�eai'_. :'3 1/4\ u to 4 TIM • :. 747 . - . .--.'t __ J .I 6Q / l ,7 • �"� (15i 49,0 : `� •0b . ?' - G . 1G m .s i, -.'/ o _ 1. _ •:�.. . \ •- e7 •Avery 1 ✓"----.% o .• i 49OO • • `REED' •• _..L.• •, f t1 . •••r;i •., �.\. •• •ems .._ • :\'v0,, ... •. 9ti I 0 ' 1 o r 460Ir 4604 •• \t •. •�' 1 a • ,� li\+ WIndsor Lake •\�•• Litt sq, _ ��. 9 �Ty . l\ �. l \ 479.2. a 47a0. 4 �\• , - 1l: mb •� e� BM :04� ,•�,� '��pd 4796 • I ....... Ix 4 -_—_ ._.••v r._ — • —4796 _- — •i •� f%•'w , � __ - j• 1 •I' �^�\�7 1 766 -797 - ._ , • " , I :�: . . ... /I�^ • LJ am ' 4790 1 �• .....•... Q0�\L..: ��794 0 . i' � �: • Windsor x.l r- • filil .- ! �•• �..f4;.71� J •• •• . � '476a _ I: i7 :.r 1 421 ' • o* w. • Jr. EVet. M•H• / �z ,� COST �"ST/�I/JATE i kVe, '74 ir�dosJ/ 5o/F �'zoa/F�. lG o00 .... 4' ZSJ&rei/C7rossi� eo/f ',Zoo•/F+. 16 000 /D nt Zcoer/IO /4900/� I /7/F,. 2a0 Sop BM 4774 ' _ _ -- jw `il dici own4o/e • .3¢ea. /'ZOOM?. _ 40 800 \>>o • .1;,9t, eic/i croft. 1 / 500 / SOD .� :( 6ne/7 4.2 eerideroo f 2 LI 000 le(.) 0 �'9 ..�08 LW; Sto-tion tu/ 4ener�r / .35000 3.5 000 �... `'+, 1;lD i-to /t 4Qie J 3, 800/1 /O�f. 38 coo _•...z i . // .=: `- %ivy 392. zoyea win 80/x' Z b. /4 ono nit Rai/rcO.r/&Zrearn,.t 40// 200/4: /Z, 0OO , `"C �j-4750 Ca/ a7/rawiloril ossinf 60/1 200/1; /2, 000 /' l \./ 9 a�6� �¢l � ._ 41 EXHIBIT /59 /�a/4,114•, /td 1 E�irxtrli�yy� ant/Vet : 72 6/5 , \ I P 7c r4/ '556 7/5 I /�90 Elu > i 1 - l""l!) I.' Lim "1" f ! o z a m ,l cic 1. smo V! ' 0 W 0 C, = ME ,lowortgalls bhrr, z J L v < X11 J W a Wn ate— �`a a r i Q QLia _ ZD ,, L > > -2- < Sa oco p EAS, o — O W p p z m .. z '/� 41 E 3 0 0 lan V co o z z •ofjMS i �/ a CD " ° ,,I i - if ti _ �. CO t oij ti) D' N 3 l ' W h w.l lS3 M° 2D DiT H.'J1 i0 J—..��, OiBo d3y0 'I / .�� ,I, o ' \ho '° v n °° ^ eR EL,' O _ o I ED v o n G`) t N I N > _ _ J ( �/� �O ° 2' •^ III I�, ', O to N >^ , I �s N ! i , I ?� J . I ,<, 1 -„i , 2 V v /I .a �'' lr.O P „ (K i -, i - ,�.i I �� '�� / �I 1. li III i' ''.. r, \co i1, 01 .i .N N1 / �I U, ll $ '7-- I .II ,Ii • / �a I. i' i k_ a a�=. . mil m :1.1 I—. . — °� . • J� t.... 7 9 v ) r ,I • \f�DDa°�J \. u', P` ) A CY)� CO n N e`� a a °o oD �. ,i' „ o° ° r. r o • . • ) B = / „I ' I( � i �; �, ., P Ei W - 1° .2 , .- .9.] I. - = s Ul o Z _ W e°' W ItG. C' x le 11. Ci" c y � � r W Q '�" t. w ` Z J ~~ G. uT) a } c a __ of - _ L1 W 0 = l'eC F.— ';o`. oA Ail v f J C.7 o v � aj. o - O W �- p p oz o E r , �.. „ q"y j,Y I _; m "t 1 ..�< . . . . .: • • 1 � 9 1 ) )I C. 1.;� 4 I sI E b s '{ e Y - J o �* - �_ { _,.. , �� s, .. '. - _ - _ f . �\� �. i` •� 0. - - 11 9 �, g',I h i L , �` ' i i q �. 'Y I.i�_ y 1, l f d �t " a- 1 - .. f, 11 e I i . t �� f'� . � �/ I 1 '. .. �'' ' —- N, ,, f ` - „ �-' t�..I __ i - --<{ _.. '1, I ,.. � f • ;,.. - •-', . - - C ' � �. _ I a �� .. Richard E. Weiderspon 4828 East Earmony Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 September 10, 1990 Dear: Weld County Commissioners Weld County is recognized as one of the largest agriculture based counties in the United States. The majority of the population in Weld County seems proud of their agriculture environment. My entire life has been closely involved with Weld County agriculture. The feedlot owned by Scott Jefferson and leased by Albert Harding contributes to the Weld County agriculture bases. The feedlot purchased hay from my farm and was operated in a professional manner. If this feedlot is closed, will it be replaced? As far as I know, a comparable feedlot does not exist in the area. Please, keep that agriculture based pride, in mind, while making your decision. Sincerely yours/ Richard E. Weiderspon EXafafr s 2 f �( 0 / � im �naso `T�� of W1n� {�� is Asf �psiC/n R �, �r Tv,,,�"; ? e, i' 301 WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 TELEPHONE: (303) 686-7476 4 ft August 8 , 1990 Ms. Lanell J. Curry Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: CASE NUMBER Amended USR-735 Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, upon hearing additional testimony at the August 2, 1990 meeting, recommended in a 6 to 1 vote that the recommendation of approval for Jefferson Farms be reversed to a recommendation of denial. I have attached the section of the unofficial minutes which pertain to this issue (Planning Commission will consider formal approval of the minutes at their September 6th meeting) . I will also forward copies to Joy Jefferson. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, TOWN OF WINDSOR Janet E. Lat r p . Planner j el • M �!r`I�4r�on�� D a" I-M �-.,r ti ,v ._ft IV'r= u '; AUG 81990 'i cy.,- ` m_ �.. %^3,:J flu CO. i':hit�l* uaaihissm < .... _ — c , �, i_s � - C)� WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION �� rQQ AUGUST 2, 1990 �� C' The Windsor Planning Commission, Regular Session, was called to order on August 2, 1990 , at 7 :03 P.M. by Chairman, Bob -Frank. Members present were Wayne Miller, David VonBramer, Jim Cook, Scott Stevens, David Schmidt, and Gale Schick. Present from staff was Janet Lathrop. PUBLIC INVITED TO BE HEARD. Robert Ehrlich, representing Amigo Farms came forth with a request that the Planning Commission reconsider their decision concerning a Weld County Referral - Use by Special Review - West of State Highway 257 . North of Weld County Road 71 adjacent to the Town of Windsor - Joy A. Jefferson. This referral was originally heard on May 3 , 1990 , at which time neither Mr. Ehrlich nor his partners had knowledge of. Mr. Ehrlich was surprised to hear at the Weld County Planning Commission meeting that Windsor had heard and made a positive recommendation. He said he did not give approval of a feed lot operation to the Jeffersons . Mr. Ehrlich is asking for a better understanding from this Board as to what occurred in May and a chance to explain Amigo Farms ' position on this matter. Mr. Ehrlich began by stating that a feed lot just doesn' t mix with people. He said originally, the Jefferson' s requested a horse boarding operation, which he and his partners felt could be compatible. Mr. Ehrlich stated that as far as he was concerned, development has already started because there have been prospective buyers looking at this property for development. Mr. Ehrlich informed the Board that the Weld County Planning Commission has recommended denial of the request for Use By Special Review, but it must still come before the Commissioners . He said he was a member of the Planning Commission for Weld County and he has some concern that Windsor ' s referral will sway the Commissioner' s vote. Janet Lathrop read the referral recommendation that was sent to Weld County. She stated it is her understanding that the document she mails to Weld County is included in the packet that is sent before the Commissioners . Ms . Lathrop said she spoke with Lanell Curry from the Weld County Planning Department earlier in the day and was told that if there is any further comment concerning Jefferson Farms from Windsor' s Planning Commission, it must be directed to the Commissioners before August 29 , 1990 . Mayor Miller re-stated his position from May in that he felt a feed lot is not appropriate in that area and he would like the Planning Commission to reconsider their decision. He questioned why Amigo Farms wasn' t notified of the May meeting. r,�,f n, 1 c , y XJ�� WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 2, 1990 � Ms . Lathrop explained that Weld County sends the information to Windsor as a referral only, and that depending on the procedure, adjacent land owners may not be included in the packet. Windsor ordinance does not require notification of adjacent land owners for county referrals . Also, she said that often times she receives referrals just hours before a meeting with the Planning Commission. In order to make the County deadlines for referral response, there is no time for such notification. Mr. Ehrlich re-stated that there is no problem with the horse operation and that Mr. Jefferson hasn' t been denied any of the original agreement. Manuel Pineda, 35065 Weld County Read 19 , Windsor, Colorado stated he wrote a letter to the Weld County Commissioners and to the Weld County Planning Department with a request to deny the Use by Special Review. He stated the Jeffersons have been in violation of county zoning regulations since October, 1989 . The original agreement was for 40 head of cattle. Now there are over 1000 head. He further stated that Jefferson Farms is not a typical family farm as Mr. Jefferson doesn' t own the cattle. The surrounding area already has three subdivisions and there are five homes just across the road from the feed lot. He said the runoff from the feed lot goes East of County Road 74 into the Thompson Lake. There is no lagoon for runoff to go into therefore it will be going into the irrigation supply. Mayor Miller made a motion to place the RECONSIDERATION OF A WELD COUNTY REFERRAL - USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 257, NORTH OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 74, ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR - JOY A. JEFFERSON on the August 2, 7990 Planning Commission agenda as item number 10-A. Gale Schick seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. RECONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO WELD COUNTY CONCERNING REFERRAL OF A USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW - WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 257 , NORTH OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 74, ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, JOY A. JEFFERSON Bob Ehrlich, representative of Amigo Farms, Inc. , again stated their desire for this Planning Commission to reconsider a recommendation made in May of this year concerning Joy A. Jefferson and the Weld County referral of Use by Special Review. He stated the area is ripe for development and that a Woodward Governor type of industry has been looking at the land. He feels that having a feed lot there is deterring the sale of the land . Mr. Ehrlich said the Commissioners may lean heavily toward approval of the Use by Special Review based upon Windsor Planning Commission' s approval . M^F 0 2 WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION 7-ipArlf:DVRI:ef °61) AUGUST 2, 1990 Jim Cook agreed with many of the comments made by Mr. Ehrlich, and added that he didn' t feel the Jeffersons misrepresented the situation in May. Mr. Cook added that because the development of the land is still years down the road, he still feels that approval with stipulations is appropriate. Robert Ehrlich said there is no place to pump the water from the feed lot and there is no lagoon on the land, therefore making the smell very strong. Janet Lathrop stated that there are County agencies such as the Health Department which have regulations to control the smell and waste. Robert Ehrlich said that is true, and that by the time Mr. Jefferson would get the money to conform to all the rules , it would be too late to clean up the mess and the damage would exist. Robert Frank said he is supportive of Mr. Ehrlich' s concerns, and the selling point in May was that Mr. Jefferson' s feed lot was only temporary. He feels that in light of the new testimony a re-hearing of Jefferson Farms is in order. Jim Cook asked if the Jeffersons should be notified before voting on the reconsideration. He felt it bothersome that Weld County doesn' t notify adjacent land owners of special requests . Janet Lathrop informed the Commission that the County does not know when the Windsor Planning Commission will hear the matter. A county Use by Special Review is basically the same procedure as a Windsor Conditional Use Grant. The governmental agency issues permission to continue a use but still remains in control by monitoring and enforcing what ever special conditions have been imposed. As with the Town, notification of adjacent property owners as to all of the hearing dates is not required by the regulations . The Town of Windsor is a referral agency only and not a hearing authority. Mayor Miller made a motion to recommend to the Weld County Commissioners denial of the Jefferson Farms special use permit and site specific development plan based on the new evidence provided at this meeting. Gale Schick seconded the motion. Roll call resulted as follows: Ayes: Frank, Miller, Schick, Schmidt, Stevens, VonBramer Nayes: Cook Absent: None Abstain: None WINDSOR PLANNING COMMISSION 1901 (,1" AUGUST 2, 1990 f David Schmidt stated that he is bothered that the Planning Commission changes its decisions . We should examine ways to be able to have evidence presented by both parties when the issue is on the Planning Commission agenda. It was Bob Frank ' s opinion that the Windsor Land Use Map should be a policy making tool and followed with each application. Jim Cook stated that he is not in favor of the original decision' s reversal because he feels that the Jeffersons should be present to give their side of the issue. He stated that if one decision was made based on a lack of adequate information, this decision may be doing the same thing. e r. 4 • r OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303) 356-4000, Ex7. 4200 P.O. Box 758 vgip GREELEY, COLORADO 60632 �. COLORADO August 20, 1990 Secretary of State Board of County Commissioners 1560 Broadway 915 Tenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Board and Secretary of State: Pursuant to C.R.S. , 524-18-109(3) (b) and 524-18-110, this constitutes disclosure of an action which may have the appearance of impinging on my official duty and fiduciary trust. Currently pending before the Board of County Commissioners is a zoning application for a Use by Special Review for Joy Jefferson. The Jefferson interests are represented by R. Russell Anson, attorney-at-law, who is currently Weld County Republican Chairman. I am a Republican candidate for office in the coming general election. Mr. Anson, as party Chairman, chairs the 26 person executive committee which makes decisions regarding such matters as funding for campaigns. No financial contribution by the Republican party towards my -campaign has been made. Furthermore, Section 24-18-104(3) (a) , specifically excludes accepting reported campaign contributions from the category of acts which constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty. The local party does publish, at their cost, a brochure containing information regarding all Republican party candidates. The possible appearance of conflict may also involve non-financial considerations in that Mr. Anson, as party Chairman,, and a former employee of the County (having resigned in 1984) , might be claimed to unduly influence this Board's decision. I am not in a position to refrain from voting on the Use by Special Review as a quorum will not be available should both Commissioners in this position abstain. As a result, I will be participating in the voting. I should also note that I have consulted with Assistant County Attorney Lee Morrison, who concurs with my view that these circumstances do not constitute a breach of the public duty with respect to the Use by Special Review process, pursuant to C.R.S. , 524-18-101, et seq. , Colorado Code of Ethics or the Weld County Home Rule Charter. Nonetheless, disclosure is given and a request made that an advisory opinion issue from your office concerning this matter. Sincerely, Constance L. Harbert CRCCS „ en Weld County Commissioner X. 11 ; N 6 ri OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE (303) 356-4000. ExT. 4200 P.O. Box 758 1GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 pe • COLORADO August 20, 1990 Secretary of State Board of County Commissioners 1560 Broadway 915 Tenth Street Denver, CO 8O2O2 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Board and Secretary of State: Pursuant to C.R.S. , S24-18-109(3) (b) and S24-18-11O, this constitutes disclosure of an action which may have the appearance of impinging on my official duty and fiduciary trust. Currently pending before the Board of County Commissioners is a zoning -application for a Use by Special Review for Joy Jefferson. The Jefferson interests are represented by R. Russell Anson, attorney-at-law, who is currently Weld County Republican Chairman. I am a Republican candidate for office in the coming general election. Mr. Anson, as party Chairman, chairs the 26 person executive committee which makes decisions regarding such matters as funding for campaigns. No financial contribution by the Republican party towards my campaign has been made. Furthermore, Section 24-18-104 (3) (a) , specifically excludes accepting reported campaign contributions from the category of acts which constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty. The local party does publish, at their cost, a brochure containing information regarding all Republican party candidates. The possible appearance of conflict may also involve non-financial considerations in that Mr. Anson, as party Chairman,, and a former employee of the County (having resigned in 1984) , might be claimed to unduly influence this Board's decision. I am not in a position to refrain from voting on the Use by Special Review as a quorum will not be available should both Commissioners in this position abstain. As a result, I will be participating in the voting. I should also note that I have consulted with Assistant County Attorney Lee Morrison, who concurs with my view that these circumstances do not constitute a breach of the public duty with respect to the Use by Special Review process, pursuant to C.R.S. , S24-18-1O1, et seq. , Colorado Code of Ethics or the Weld County Home Rule Charter. Nonetheless, disclosure is given and a request made that an advisory opinion issue from your office concerning this matter. Sincerely, StiK � Gene R. Brantnerr;o 'r Weld County Commissioner OC V >L di R. RUSSELL ANSON CO: - .S ATTORNEY AT LAW „t1 , THE LAW BUILDING Fa Jr. I it /:±1 !:: 51 1011 11TH AVENUE r„ P.O. BOX 326 CLEni, GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 TO THE-BOARD 4"/ (303) 353-5508 TELECOPIER: (303) 356-1111 July 16 , 1990 Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners P. O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Amended USR-735 , Scott and Joy Jefferson Dear Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners : The undersigned has been retained to represent the Jeffersons concerning the amended USR-73 that is _presently scheduled to be heard before the -Board of County Commissioners on July 25, 1990 . Request is herein made that the hearing be continued to another date preferably August 2-g, 1990 . The reason for our request is that Mr. Jefferson recently retained me and I am unable to appear on the July 25 date as I will be out of the state during that week. Thank you,„yery much for your consideration in this matter. Very truly 2rs, IC-Russell Anson Attorney at Law RRA:yd pc: Scott Jefferson C O s" EX I-)i , r' +c)" DATE: July 2, 1990 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 25th day of July, 1990 , at 10 :00 A.M. Docket No. 90-27 - Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 ,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store - Joy A. Jefferson OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: ae QPei, k. Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD OUNTY, COLORADO erne-,, n Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission June 5, 1990 Page 2 The Chairman asked the applicants if they had reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff. They had not and the Chairman allowed them time to do so. They expressed concerns regarding Condition 2, item 3. The houses and the mobile home, to his knowledge, have always been a source of income, and they would like to continue renting. However, in order to take advantage of this year's season they would like the Special Use permit acted on today, and if it is approved by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners they will come back for an amendment to rent out the dwellings. The Chairman asked Keith to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number USR-878 for Daniel Ochsner and Barry Payant for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreation facility be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation presented by the -Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony of the applicant. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bud Halldorson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; - Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Roes - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 APPLICANT: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Amended Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. APPEARANCE: Scott Jefferson _represented the applicant. He stated he manages and operates this farm for his mother. They want to build up the property to n,C Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission June 5, 1990 Page 3 include the uses stated in the application materials. This was a feedlot for 4, 500 head of cattle prior to their ownership. They have only room for 1,500 head, and they will abandon this operation as soon as the surrounding properties are being developed. They are surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the south, north, and east sides. Lanell Curry reviewed the history of this request. The ' property is currently in violation. The original permit, approved in March 1986, allowed for 60 head of horses. A Show Cause Hearing was held and this application is a result of the Board's resolution. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Bob Ehrlich, Amigo Farms, stated they were not notified of a Planning Commission meeting at the Town of Windsor. A statement was made at this meeting that they are not opposed to this request. That is not true. They are against it because they have started to develop the adjacent land and current uses reflect on future uses. A flag pole annexation was performed by the Town of Windsor co incorporate the adjacent property. The are not against the original permit, but they are against the feedlot operation. They have no animosities. This is just a business decision, and they have already stated development in the area. Craig Harrison, Resource Corporation, owns property adjacent to this property. He also is against the feedlot for cattle. Tape 374 Larry Archer, adjacent property owner, stated he operates a dairy farm on his property. He is not opposed to this use and feels it is reasonable request. The Chairman asked Lanell Curry to read the County Commissioner's Show Cause Resolution into the record. Scott Jefferson stated he could understand the concerns of the neighbors, but the land is still being farmed and they would be allowed 80 horses as a use by right in the Agricultural zone district. They would be willing to discontinue the feedlot as soon as ground is broken for development on adjacent properties. The Chairman asked Lanell Curry to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff into the record. The staff's recommendation was for denial. riro-o-. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission June 5, 1990 Page 4 MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Casa Number Amended USR-735 for Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation for 1,500 cattle, a horse boarding and training facility for 150 head, and a tack and feed store be. forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning 'Commission's recommendation denial based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony _heard by the Planning Commission. - Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bud Halldorson --no; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Rick Iverson - no; - Bud Clemons - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried with four voting for the motion and two voting against the motion. The Chairman dismissed the meeting for lunch at 11:38 a.m. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 1:30 p.m. NOTICE: LeAnn Reid, -Planning Commission Member and Rod Allison, Principal Planner are now present. CASE NUMBER: USR-911 APPLICANT: Steven 1H. and Kim M. Nelson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment (Tractor and Farm Implement Sales and Service Facility) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E} SE} of Section 6, T2N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles south of the Town of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 25-1/2, south of Wald County Road 26. APPEARANCE: Fred Otis, Attorney at Law, represented the applicant. Mr. and Mrs. Nelson wish to put in a farm implement and repair facility. To begin with, they will not employ any additional people. They are currently operating their business in Boulder County, but they want to relocated to Southern Weld County. This property is an abandoned gravel mine and they have addressed all required concerns in applying for this Special Use permit. Their plans will enhance tha property. Most of their customers are "hobby" farmers with small tracts. n• OUV:" J'A BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING;-80MNASSIO ' Q ' RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE -BOARD OF COUNTY COMMLS8IONERS Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution Tbs introduted for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be Zt Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 , 500 cattle) , horse boarding and training _facility acility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, S7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road T4; adjacent to the Sown of Windsor. be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: It is the opinion -of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has not shown compliance with Section 24. 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The applicant has not demonstrated xhat the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed is within the urban growth boundary of the Town of Windsor and is a 20.5 acre agriculturally zoned parcel surrounded by the Town of Windsor on three sides. The applicant has not shown how the proposed use will be consistent with the urban-type uses planned for the adjacent properties. - The proposal is not consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. Areas for the conduct of _Uses by Special Review are provided in xhe Agricultural zone for uses which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. The location of this parcel, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, is not suitable for the intensive type of -operation proposed. - The proposed uses will not be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Windsor future land use plan. This _parcel is surrounded by the Town of Windsor on _the west, north, and east boundaries. The Town of Windsor properties are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) . The PUD would allow industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The south boundary of the property is not in _the Town sf Windsor and is coned Agricultural. However, the Town of Windsor has shown the property on its future land use map for commercial uses. The use S\r in4r Joy A. Jefferson Amended USR-733 Page 2 of the property as a 1 , 500 head cattle livestock confinement operation and 150 head thorse boarding and training facility will not be compatible with the projected future land uses of the Town of Windsor. - The applicant has not demonstrated that there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. Two surrounding property owners have expressed objections to the proposed use based on the intensity of the use and -environmental concerns. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi VOTE For Passage Against Passage Judy Yamaguchi Bud Halldorson Bud Clemons Rick Iverson Jerry Kiefer Ernie Ross The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further _proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on June 5, 1990, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 7th day of June, 1999. �b Bobbie Good \1 Secretary o r.9y 0.-7:F INVW '‘IY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONS' RATION Case Number Amended USR-733 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1 . Application 9 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) I page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field Check X 11 . 5-14-90 referral from West Greeley Soil X Conservation District 12. 5-10-90 referral from Weld County Health Dept. X 13. 5-9-90 referral from Town of Windsor X 14. 5-7-90 referral from Department of Highways X 15. 5-8-90 referral from County Extension X 16. 5-2-90 referral from Windsor/Severance FPD X 17. 5-3-90 referral from Weld County Engineering X 18. 4-26-90 letter to applicant X 19. 5-26-90 letter of objection from Manuel Pineda X 20. 5-31-90 letter of objection from Robert E. X Ehrlich I hereby certify that the 20 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on June 8, 1990. 7 rent Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) �, G •.. SUBSCRTB H L�'jAl`ID SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS � - day of �uhn 19�G . \\OMR), spro r rc o\a's. . t v.& NOTAR PUBLIC My Commission Expires ._n7 Fxh; b +�} EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case tis® Lp -ao AAUM U0-2, Q . 0 C Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description (c/S A. Ple-IL/H &le' ailiftIL LA/ ZEGYYLO&-aanuiteed- G b 40A B. pzaduLin_o, (6-Th_htoatotH Alvitritinu b c'/I s c. il?.0 it-) 65-1-N-hut4.4 I inc.) sziet„.A_Ag y itheuita ,,/e• ( ,firpite (26 Al th lht'eziioc 7 ��f 7t il11// //�� //11 a�t t11 /1 0 0• ig nit_t horn, 2� l_ti at- fn t ,D"n-tlu c hD H• C.Lr11L}uA 1i.'.1Imo a IL d'i /Li- S Ali/HIP-J..t, II tti'L 3iE:a r• ,`,,Fru11 as � llJ'vp,�.Jt,' ict , t r, J. Ur c f( - c 1-- —�` 9 K. c(;etr,ciA. 3IG a L. /iiikL Phs, ii cAietiAic ) itir- ft/01q' v� 7 LAIL 0. C _______________ - 5-a ci,,,,,,_ vao-rt Q V"� gc °' vv,,,,heit 5 on, &4_, :67 -k? ayk,op Pa 0LA 6,„.„,„ '7, clow cp„,,e)„,_ 4„,_ r, , .,,m, Date: June 5, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, -Englewood, CO SOLID REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 ,-500 tattle) , horse boarding and training _facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} Af Section 12, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West -of State Highway 257, north of -Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT -THIS -REQUEST -BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: It is she opinion of the _Department Af Planning Services' staff that the applicant has not shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the WWeld County Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed is within the urban growth boundary of the -Town of Windsor and is a 20.5 agriculturally zoned parcel surrounded by the Town of -Windsor on three sides. The applicant has not shown how the proposed use will be consistent with the urban-type uses planned for the adjacent -properties. - The proposal is not Consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. Areas for xhe conduct of Uses by Special _Review are provided in the Agricultural zone for uses which have been determined to be more intense or so have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. The location of this parcel, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, is not suitable for the intensive type of operation proposed. - The proposed uses will not be -compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as -projected by the Windsor future land use plan. This parcel is surrounded by the Town of Windsor on the west, north, and east boundaries. The Town of Windsor properties are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) . The PUD would allow industrial, commercial, and sesidential uses. The south boundary of the property is not in the Town of -Windsor and is zoned Agricultural. However, the Town mil Windsor has shown the property on its future land use Amp for commercial uses. The use of the property as a 1,500 head cattle livestock confinement operation and 150 head horse boarding and training facility will not be -compatible aaith the projected future land uses -of the Town of Windsor. °C-�s'07 Joy A. Jefferson Amended USR-735 Page 2 - The applicant has not demonstrated that there is adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. Two surrounding property owners have expressed objections to the proposed use based on the intensity of the use and environmental concerns. o r. 9. .—) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AMENDED USR-735 JOY A. JEFFERSON The Town of Windsor Planning Commission recommended approval of this request at its May 3 regular meeting with the stipulation that the cattle feeding operation cease when development occurs on the annexed property adjacent to the site. a.r n' (711:4;t: OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303) 356.4000, Ext 4200 P.O.. Box 758 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 I C. . C-OLOR ADO ' m 7-7 c -n • June 11, 1990 =-• ' 7, r� Joy A. Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Ms. Jefferson: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as part of the SEi of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by June 25, 1990. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Yingt k) CHAIRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. F'xh:b,-12Li /:0 _ P 556 98? 877 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL JOY A. JEFFERSON 35 MARTIN LANE ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 Postage S Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered H m Date, Receipt ss of D li whom. Dale,and Address of Delivery d j TOTAL Postage and Fees S 8 Postmark or Dale a) Nf_ /A9o� / N a • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services ars desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse-side.Failure to do this will prevent this car from beigthe eturned ad bonareturn ees t e ofee will to and owing services are awn e.f othe r delivered postmaster or ees an c ec ox es or additional servicels)requested.1. ❑ Show to whom deliva� (Extra charge)d, date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery tra charge)3. Article Addressed to: j f• e ow Type of Service: 'OY A. JEFFERSON ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Certified -COD 5 MARTIN LANE Return Merchandise for❑ Express Mail ❑ Receipt :NGLEWOOD, CO 80110 Always-obtain signature of addressee or agent settPATE DELIVERED. S. Addles-wets uested and fee (ONLY if pawl) 7, s- e of Deliv=ry ,,, V-/1- ''• G PS Form 3811, Apr. 19R9 ) U,. a..n , ( ,. ... ,(1 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT T 26 fray 199 , 35065 ALTS CLO. ~0-550 `O: 1 MAY 3 0 1990 t1 JLI. EIl rL.i;i1fli 1/4 G; I+I iaiCi. c/o Ls. d'urry am 3-4.2 915 10th St. Weld Co. Plaguing uommissiou ii; r1 Y, dCLC. 30631 JU.ixiB02: J�ti�,:iJ1,i Y .: iJ.LLT.1.I' \J:_C..i 1?vill J... _,_i:Cl it lr ,iDr11 199 TO "C.0Z. LAY CCAC_la.: Li I:,J Very briefly , we Fineda Farms would -like to point out a few: facts and :rake some comments concerning the Jefferson horse facility and cattle feed lot. Our main farming aperation is located in the West of See. 4 Twn 6 cr f7 . , ar diagonally across to the south about a ;Wile. Pir_eda Farms is very :Much opposed to the -change of use as requested . —The Jefferson' s are not your "typical family farm operation". —They do not own the cattle that are being fed on the premises, i'he cattle are not awned by the persons feeding them. The cattle are owned by third parties wno are having their cattle "custom fed " , ar also known as "commercial feedin_ -The Jefferson' s originally had no _intent in rmonducting a cattle feeding op— eration. Some oS the facilities were taken down, dismantled , or sold . Inclu— ded were--feed bunks were removed , a cattle weighing scale was dismantled , feed -and grain mixing and moving equipment was also sold or taken -down. —The existing feedltt still has capacity to Seed a total of 2.000 head of cattle. —.Before and even now that the feedlot is back in operation the runoff from the the feedlot goes east along _Road 74 and runs directly into the Thompson lake and reservoir which is owned and operated by the Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company, how is this elviornm-ental concern going to be addressed by the Commissioners and other geld County and Colorado state agencies? The feedlot does not have a lagoon for surf ice runoff. —The feedlot already borders the windscr City limits on Hiway RL 74 . —The feedlot will not be, and is not now compatible with the development now occurring in the immediate area or with future proposed development. She farm directly to the south has been sub—divided into 40 and ?0 acre tracts, there are are two new building sites doing up no —The 160 acre farm that the feedlot is situated on now has been already sub— divided into 3 separate parcels. 9c059"3 z Jefferson iee :lot —The feedlot was reported in violation about 3 months aao , it has teen in violation a lot longer than that. (:,ore than E month-s by by erscnal obser— vation.) —ire felt the Board was very lenient and easy on the Ja fersonb, —The Eoara caught us by surprise in asking us what the penalty for violation ahculd be. Sur_ely the Commissioners have guidlines to follow in cas-es like this. Something- like a time limit to remove the cattle . (1O to 30 :days and or a fine, el00.00 to 4,150.00 a day maximum starting; around the time the violation was first noticad. That is a decision for the Commissioners to mske. r - rlease make this letter available to all the Board _nember-s. I will answer questions regardin_ the statements I have made here prior to the next meetir__. Thank you. ` Signed... 1;11-4-4-17 //� emss l/ , Manuel Pineaa Pineda & Sons Farms Inc. May 31, 1990 Weld County Department of Planning Services Attention : Lanell J . Curry 915 10th Street - Room -342 Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number - Amended USR - 735 Dear Lanell : Regarding the above captioned, please be advised that Amigo Farms, Inc. is opposed to the request outlined in this -case . Amigo Farms, Inc. owns the land adjoining the applicants parcel on the west, north and east . We do not believe that it is in the best inter-est of the county and the surrounding landowners to allow this type of enterprise. As you are aware, the applicants property is located in a transitional use area. Land that has historically been utilized for agricultural purposes is now being converted to other uses (primarily rural residential ) . Commercial cattle feeding operations and residential development do mot mix very well . Increased truck traffic and other types of vehicle flows, noise, insects and other pests, odor and the potential for environmental damage from pollution are associated with this type of enterprise. I believe it is imperative that the Weld County Department of Planning Services seriously consider this application and base their decision on the potential impact this type of operation will have on this part of the county. Thank you for your time and consideration. Since el --� � �bert E. Ehrlich; Pre i ent ,UN 1 1990 Amigo Farms, Inc. C., .. - pc: File Nob 4'0 PIninuhg 60IOINISSI00 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: May 29, 1990 CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-735 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson ADDRESS: 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, CO 80110 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head) , and tack and feed store. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. SIZE OF PARCEL: 20.5 Acres, ± POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the State of Colorado, Division of Highways, Weld County Extension Office, Windsor-Severance Fire Protection District, Weld County Engineering Department, West Greeley Soil. Conservation District, Weld County Health Department, and Town of Windsor. Copies of these referral responses have been included in this summary packet. The Town of Windsor has recommended conditional approval and has expressed concerns for the future development of the surrounding area. The Town of Windsor borders this site on the west, north, and east sides. One inquiry and two objections have been received from surrounding property owners. • 9112 r 104. .. ) 14 \ _ i r __ 102. — I r • \ -.NA _. �! :\ t a � }• i 4. • t 9r � ° 4 t 1: 100.. . •rLa r �. • c) �)_ :1 t'• }, ,, U1 K,• . ,. II II ";4.V"} •�Nu" )• Fhb I. ), 98' •. .-- second c_na.i▪ .. a, • \. 'iltJ } !h ` 1 . ^ _ (I / , 7-7 I . --\„r I • - • •. • a as I • - . •- I e _ '° Ij ' • IN.• ." • I' • µj' I at t° v a• •I' a" m 1 " 86 v�,a,� , • • \ • !\/• e, \\ • . ,1 .-p 82.•"OIs[oa•Ix • '�• .. . J \ • \ ' 9: ' / �‘•-....II • •' M/I•/ - ` r` 1 t� •3 I 9 re5 t .rfn+ne•e /-' va Y .. .. •spa. ma 80.... T 7N. e`°°}'"1••• coY,y ^- )I--it) ,� .A _ ▪ •" 9 • ° �°•••.°_I. a ▪ °:) ..^ . . ... 1.1 . ' • • Fua.we 76. .. . a •o' •. 1 t', x, 50 . -- Iz • . : ! a - �� MMwE51fAN: — • Y}"s • Aa,ew i • •~ 1 iv iJ :fs . PO It on Av g u.} + 74. .. . r •..1 1.i••• In° ?• 1�-o 97 .' e:! Cr �^ - w Si.'• • 1.• _a EbEFGNCc • r .....al: EA r. 4 • 72... ~,� � . C • _ a ▪ /1 • .•• oc o • sJ • ;• •d . sacs :a a • 1,. ' w• t• ...• 1•� _.• �. �'.'.' -�� o o• • o^ ', n .no 70. •• • 5 • ••• • ti • • �u , ' . • ^ : La �-•-:i-�� ' ; j� _��:._._-fit. _-d-.. ' _I '.+•• V T.1/4 168 T 6N 49°I2 0 •_ - r pE °•�,•�, • ,rn� �YL 1 N n 7.4.•' /�y ! 7o FI Y.i.I • °• • -•• • • '. �,✓xYli.L44,, 1-'. .%:"." t.2- ',•,•1\` ^ �_ • ,• :I Net• 16q1`' SOpY i• .03 24 Pi i° •) Z . L '• S. ._._. i " . '• • 3.. .• U,�s.�r:•:..• ••..•• IS '• �o ,•O,rcn F• 1• �L 7 u•oc=.¢u'N. 1 • • • O•n9.�'I \\. I 1 i,. [.sir i — i 3U 29 I 2A � s) 4 I l I . I �1 na so r C% irAsi Li � � Tv, y �- \ �, 31 33 i � � u - 75 u t \\ i I � Th,„ - - '. - - - � nytso+i ( - - - '� —. -i4 / I , E i4 5 _ , ; �, r , har41 m it8 • if 6in . ,_ L rr I VIII i ,//�� CM^ Y C T s( E• �� 2. - SS N �— a 3F S , . a I,* ro .: pp cI -' { e L. '.-c4;. . {{° •- _ Yd� -_.... 4 + k � ... P • 8 ? ~ ` in t f. ! ;1/4 ]. n r i1 t II 3' .-- '* it 1x ;,. a a " ` z. t. t; '' 3 • r _lif ii , i.• } r ,mac. If r h. Y 5i .» 1 }.r 1~ t I '_ C5.' , Y a o ) 4 4 S ••' 1 t , ` Fw • ka t M . .- "'` m { 4 ^ -Ii 1II Is III I I en- F 3 ' 4L � ) ' -7 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Amended USR-735 DATE OF INSPECTION: May 15, 1990 NAME: Joy A. Jefferson REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a livestock confinement operation (1, 500 cattle) horse boarding and training facility (150 head) and tack and feed store LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEk of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: West of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74; adjacent to the Town of Windsor. LAND USE: N Agricultural production E Agricultural production, State Highway 257 S Agricultural production W Agricultural production ZONING: N City of Windsor - PUD (Industrial and Commercial) E City of Windsor - PUD (Industrial and Commercial) S A (Agricultural) W City of Windsor - PUD (Industrial and Commercial) NW City of Windsor - PDR (Residential and Neighborhood Commercial) within .5 miles COMMENTS: Access to the site is from Weld County Road 74, a paved County arterial. There are 3 signs next to Weld County Road 74. There are approximately 20 horses and 50 cows on the property. There are driveways through the pen areas. The property is relatively flat. The southeastern part of the property is used for feed storage. The rest of the property is as shown on the plat. By. n 11 J. C r Current Plan er PA70 1n3 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Joy_1. Jefferson CASE NUMBER: Amended DSR-735 REFERRALS SENT: -April 26, 1990 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: May 10, 19-90 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton , X Extension Service Dacono Emergency Management Office _Eaton Sheriff's Office Erie X Engineering _Evans ^Housing Authority Firestone Airport Authority _Fort Lupton _Building Inspection Frederick _Garden City STATE Gil-crest Division of Water Resources _Greeley iGeological Survey Grover _Department of Health Hudson X Highway department Johnstown _Historical Society �Keenesburg _Water Conservation Soard Kersey Oil and Gas Conservation -Commission La Salle Lochhuie FIRE DISTRICTS - Longmont__Ault F-1 Mead _Berthoud F-2 Milliken _Brighton F--3 New Raymer Dacono F-l9 _- Nunn Eaton F-4 _Platteville _Fort Impton F-5 _Severance Galeton F-6 ,, X Windsor Hudson F-7 _Johnstown F-S COUNTIES LaSalle F-9 Adams Longmont F-10 Boulder Milliken F-11 �Larimer _Nunn F-12 _Pawnee _Platteville F-L3 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT -AGENCIES _Platte valley F-14 _ US Army Corp of Engineers Poudre valley F-15 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Raymer Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commiasion X Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-IS -- --Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER Fort Collins _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. ✓ X Greeley Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Longmont �Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Ernie Ross UNITED STA-TES S_o i 1 DEPARTMENT OF C-on$ervation 431)2 W. 9th St . Rd . AGRICULTURE Servi-ce Greeley , CO 80634 May 14 , 1990 West Grealay Soil Conservation District 33oard of Supervisors F .O. Box 8-6 Greeley , CD 80632 Weld roynty Case Number : USR-735 Dear Board Members : I have rmviewe-d the application for Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a livestock c-onfinement -operation ( 1 , 500 cattle ) , horse boarding and training facility ( 150 head ) , an_d tack and feel' store . Soi 1-s are consistent with the planned activities . The appl icat ion , however , doesn ' t include for review plans for animal waste facilities , sizing , drainage area , -etc . No seeding species for grass and trees were included for review. All facilities are presently in place and no new facilities will be constructed . I recommend the Weld County Planning office require a waste water utilization plan which indicates sizing and cap-acitie3 , with -size and location of runoff and waste -holding facility be -Filed as a part of the request . The plan should include the uses -and how th-e runo-ff water-s ar-e to be disposed of and locations of di-scharge or application . This would help to determine the impact to slir-Fare and subsurfac-e water -qu-ality . Without these particular plans , it ' s di-fficult to determine adequacy of designed or planned sys#ems . Sincerely , 0 14-753yew Ronald D. Miller District Conservationist 144Y297990 RDM: kep _ Weld CO. Mangum Crrrnnima w ,- 0,5;9r,-;;, Wilk To Weld County Planning May 10, 1990 Date Environmental Protection Services COLORADO From Case Number: USR-735 Name: Jefferson, Joy A. Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the livestock confinement area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. The facility shall be in compliance with-the Colorado Guidelines for Feedlot Runoff Containment, prior to final approval of the proposed use. 3. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers, empty livestock dip containers, anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. Required Emissions Permit is obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health for fugitive dust. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 6. An ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 7. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be fiandled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 8. Fugitive dust must be controlled on this site. 9. The Division requires that this facility provide an employees restroom with toilets served by an approved septic sew j"1 . system. �" I 1.-^. 0 MAY 1 5 1990 WP353/dgc O'1 g�...; WL'IfY tif, ilnirdow „moon, loll�;,nasor it wit of ` iVin�or" 0+f e 301 WALNUT • WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 if TELEPHONE: (303)886-7476 IA 1'170 May 9, 1990 Ms. Lanell Curry Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 90631 RE: Amended USR-735 Dear Lanell: The Windsor Planning Commission, at their xegular meeting May 3 , 1990 , considered the above mentioned Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit. The Planning Commission recommends that the applications be approved with the stipulation that when development occurs on the annexed property adjacent to the site, the cattle feeding operation cease. Please let me know 11 you have any questions or comments . Sincerely, TOWN OF WINDSOR 7—' t y-.° z ".- ¢ .e t c , s1,`�N 4.--d _/ / /Janet E. Lath op d / Assistant to the Administrator j el Vi a" ,N e+. l�;1�i p fI 1Yn, SCCc' i1 `,ua°r 1 ; 1990 1 I I _I WP:4 r.ri ili.<<, 0,_ .. STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS7 ,N„ P.O. Box 850 t %'s i Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 %`,0� � (303) 353-1232 '� °" OF LOV N.mxW May 7, 1990 Weld Co. , S.H. 257 Joy Jefferson Site Spec. Dev. Plan No. of WCR 74 W. of S.H. 257 DOH File 45100 Ms. Lanell J. Curry, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Ms. Curry: We have reviewed the application from Joy A. Jefferson, and we have the following comment. There will be no apparent impact to State Highway 257 caused by this development. No access permit will be necessary since access is to Weld County Road 74. The traffic generated from County Road 74 to State Highway 257 should have little impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Please contact me at 350-2163 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS D. RAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER J aThX44 Evan A. Hooper, r. Development/Access Coordinator EAH:smw cc: L.D. Yost R.G. Sherriff File: Hooper via Crier -1r R ' ' c 1990 tetio Cp. 4lannink wi nmssimt 111 i 11 ikf i I f- t o hit.)I it i f,..''f I rgt (9:11f f i II I [ I tit I.c. r 1 I . ... V f A if _—.-- —PRONE(303)35153000;nr:aROU- I 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 �� CASE NUMBER Amended USR-735 COLORADO April 26, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1 , 500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head), and tack and feed store. The parcel of land is described as part of the SEi of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74, adjacent to the Town of Windsor. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 10, 19-90, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. S:- 67 J a NI 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this 3'eque4 2I(is/is not) compatible with the intereststof our Si town for the following reasons: 2 ^I 7; rte'n zl A 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with�pur IJ interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed lette . Sign • �� —Agency: � �l��✓J Date: S--8 1O CI•n:o§'�,,, ill C(1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 ' 91510th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER Amended USR-735. COLORADO April 26, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Joy A. Jefferson for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (1,500 cattle) , horse boarding and training facility (150 head), and tack and feed store. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE1 of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th T.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of State Highway 257, north of Weld County Road 74, adjacent to the Town of Windsor. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 10, 1990, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. --_ 0�9r-� 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel thisFteque7( 1 (is/is not) compatible with the interestsoflour town for the following reasons: ? I x -11 5 <I <I 1 3. X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts wgth�ur interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. + Pleas re er to -the enclosed letter; i G il�f Signed: r rct / ey: l� �'ryt��, — � �e«,cL � t f f� /� Date: .4� g — 7.67 'l� Sr" MEMORA11DUM 41 a. wine Lanell Curry, Planning May 3, 1990 T° Date COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer �)//n2 � Jefferson, USR-735 //�� Subject: Weld County Road 74 is a major artery with an average daily traffic count of 3,200 vehicles. Undoubtedly, there will be major improvements to Road 74 at sometime in the future. I recommend the applicant be required to dedicate an additional 20' of right-of-way. Also, because of the amount of traffic on Road 74, and because of the public access proposed to this site, I recommend the multiple entrances onto Road 74 be consolidated to one access. DS/mw:prjeff cc: Commissioner Kirby _ Planning Referral Tile - Jefferson USR-735 5` E )�a'1 f t\'r r �'' a -5 I {, PAY 1990 thl(Q �u, 1 ihn.mt ,.IIIIIiNIS=1U1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Amended USR-735 Joy A. Jefferson Dennis M. and Bonita L. Sterk 7511 Weld County Road 74 Windsor, CO 80550 James A. and JoAnn J. Ochsner 7422 Weld County Road 74 Windsor, CO 80550 Amigo Farms, Inc. 1200 Carousel, Suite 100 Windsor, CO 80550 Harrison Resource Corporation 769 Whalers Way Suite A-200 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Peter C. and Nancy D. Hyland 2515 Falcon Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Kenneth J.and Margaret K. Hall 901 Sandy Cove Lane Fort Collins, CO 80525 Amigo Farms, Inc. P.O. Box 60 Milliken, CO 80543 C( 0 r',+ AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Q 705 3 2 v 0 0 o SATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, an ownership update from a title or abstract company, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within 30 days of the application submission date. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn me this 19 day April , 19 90 , by Joy A. Jefferson WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: _ ea/0-� O /61-11e ,'Votary Publl � -: f SEC:; s Sept.29, 1994 333:x. "'rtDi Englewood,Colorado 80110 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # 11(91;50\ � Sieul< .7511 Wc Q 1*7y 070 - 32-C3nnrZb 11(91;5 0\ 3 6xi l is 1 1,.,`n A stir to. 90550 nCin5 hLir 7 (_ 27 wcR.07y 7c75-M2 -0ccip 4S tn."ts A' A" Ly,`oct.so� co. yO550 /gym, r,c.) 1=A✓ w 5 inn. ) Ise) C1rot.Se I) Sn;re 100 U7Ci - 32-ockw36 A.-AA l74-0 Yet .s J2ez, .youtivl leo (27r) C3 C' o@ V wiwdSw" Ge, Sbc5G: Har-r :5on. Resot rce core 7A C5 whaje.rS LL-e-Ly oQn7-0c -o©ot -96 Stu re A -706 grCo(1:4,3 CO, COS 2 5 i n ylexIA 2515 4.<(coR, ^ci 0 00065,5 _pe, r C 3 474nc7 D 5 Cc, R6,>74 1-Nal( 90/ Six COVe n wen-0 oono 5) ke,nvte-r4t 3 V ar�ew. 1-` 1 r ColUAL Cc, c)C6ac; AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property p -70G ,g7 (inoin -` STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of minerals on or under the parcel of land which is the subiect of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, from an ownership update from a title or abstract company, or an attorney. 97ty -r-076tScrPLI The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day of April , 19 90 , By Joy a. Jefferson WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: M 1:4139 Sept.29, 1993' 333 W.Han radon Englewood,Colorado 80110 e//Q .,e ar y yP lic INTEREST OWNERS Minerals and/or Subsurface Amigo Farms Inc . P . O. Box 60 Millikin , Co . 80543 neeS 410: ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES \ PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4400 ' 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO April 26, 1990 Mr. Michael Jefferson 35 Martin Lane Englewood, CO 80550 Subject: Amended USR-735 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and an amended Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (maximum 1, 500 head cattle) , a horse boarding and training facility (maximum 150 head) , and a tack and feed store on a parcel of land described as part of the SE} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Jefferson: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, at 1 :30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Windsor Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Janet Lathrop at 686-7476 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to May 20, 1990, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than May 25, 1990. tr 17 rmaele6/ a6 Mr. Michael Jefferson April 26, 1990 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, cee(9O1., Lanell J. Curry Current Planner LJC:rj g USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee iSpt? Receipt Number 1iLVA15 Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA; T 7 N, R 6-7 W SP �� Section 32_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: se X4 Section 32. T 1 N, R 67 W Property Address (if available) -768 [ We_Id PRESENT ZONE (n...AA (icy X74 w; �Sov ≥� Cv. 5 OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE _ t D. G PROPOSED LAND USE Hors,- Qan d S_ r„ an �U. tank, pc ed sio r� / F�e�J !or EXISTING LAND USE S !'�m.^Sr (k+c.rdn rralh:n� S, SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: — —— — — Name: ray 4 l-ccOer9om Address: 5 ,„arr ,` `n City F'S e wmo� Zip X116 P 7R1 -1348 Business Telephone 0 Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone 0 Business Telephone 0 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: rilicino€1 T Address: pAl rniA L„e City F i /euoc.d ' Zip S:b1iF7 Home Telephone 0 781-134 Business Telephone 0 6a.,-29233 List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: 3.6 /}- ,Te_We^sC..� Address: -3r; ar,. SNP City I= - SI zip Basso Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) /, n L�. I� S n ure: / or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day of April 19 90, —7 NOTARY UBLIC L7; My commission expires frBSSBpt29, 1993 E ialewood, Colorado 80110 USE BY SPLCIAL REVIL:. CCUnTY Department of planning Services Purpose of request : 1a. To continue boarding, training, and breeding horses with 150 head maximum during the breeding season, 60-80 head during: the non-breeding season. b. To e4d to the operation a 150' x 300' indoor arena and stalls , along with a flack and feed shop. 2. Return part of the property to a feedlot with approx. 1500 head capacity . The cattle help finance the improvements of the horse boarding operation. The primary need for the cattle is to finance the im- provements of the property to make it an attractive and full service equine facility . The purpose for the facility is to be a part of, and service the growing equine industry in Northern Colorado. Secondary , the operation is presently bringing out-of-state money to the r.eld County area including our operation, local farmers from whom feed is purchased, farmer who feeds the cattle and provides three jobs. Other businesses who benefit include veterinary services , veterinary supply , auto parts, and restaurants. For example, during the month of March, the operation brought over x;100,000. to ;eld County and Windsor areas. The property was purchased August 1984. Prior use had been a feedlot for approx. 4800 head of cattle. The property had not been used for several years and was in rundown con- dition. It had been separated from the surrounding agricul- tural ' property . (ref: Recorded Extension No. 0705-32-4-RE-688) The property is irregular in shape of approx. 20.5 acres. There are two wood frame houses, garage, large wood barn, 100,000 lb. scale, scale house, two metal storage sheds and misc. wooden buildings on the property . In the S.E. corner of the property there is a large concrete pad. and mixing plant. The balance of the property , 15 acres , consists of large pens. The surrounding property is being used for agriculture right now, although it was annexed into the town of. 1;:indsor in 1985. It has been zoned as Planned Unit Development for Industrial and Commercial use. The nearest residence is approx. 600 ft. from our west property line, sotth and across ':CR. 74 approx. 800ft. , east and across state highway 257 approx. 1 mile and north approx. 1/2 mile to existing building. The maximum number of users will be between 45-50 people. The number of employees will be 8-10 during the operating hours of 6 :00 a.m. —8:00 p.m. . The water source is the and there are three septic systems servicing; this facility . °,CIIP .S Access to the property is off W.C.R. 74 , with daily use consisting of standard automobiles, pick-ups and horse trailers and feedtrucks. Approx. once every three months, one to twenty cattle trucks will be delivering or receiving cattle. Fire protection consists of existing water supply , fire extinguishers in each building, and the ':`indsor Fire Dept. services the area. Manure from cattle will be piled in pens then taken to surrounding farms and spread on fields. The waste from horses is also stockpiled and spread on surrounding farms. If unable to get into fields, the piles will be moved to the farms in which. manure is to be used. Storm water retention facilities associated with proposed use will be for contaminated water. . This will be built at the south east corner of the property to specifications set by the environmental health department. All uncontaminated water .from storm runoff is contained in ditches along: the south end of property. All barren ground not driven on is being planted in a pasture grass and trees are planded as time and money allow. The existing facilities are already in operation and no extra construction is necessary for the cattle feeding operation. By using the existing; facilities as they were designed, we believe we can upgrade the property to be an .asset to the surrounding area. The only addition would be a permanently located 150' x 300' indoor arena with stalls to be used by boarders, FFA members, . 4-H groups, and residents of North- ern Colorado. Statement on how the proposal is cinsistant with the ',.eld County Comprehensive Plan: The property surrounding the west,north and east side of this property was annexed into indsor in 1985 for industrial/commercial use and is presently used for agriculture. The tack and feed shop and equine facility will helpattract other commercial development to the area an still keep the rural community charm that Windsor has. The equine industry is on the rise and a top quality equine facility_ in this area is now in demand. The feeding of cattle will enable us to fill that need by upgrading the existing buildings and fences, adding an indoor arena and stalls, planting trees, paving roads , and purchasing needed equipment. The facility for cattle was here before we puri chased the property , so no agricultural land will be taken out of production. The land to the south of us is zoned for agriculture and is still outside city limits. Although commercial cattleifeeding and the tack and feed shop is consistant with the commercial zoning, we feel the proposed facility is a working part of agriculture as well . Concerning the protection of the health., safety , and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and county , Ey providing; a safe and secure location for horse boarding and a safe arena for riding ar,d training, we are insuring the safety and welfare for the area. Regarding the cattle oiler- . tion we will be subject to and follow the guidelines set by the Environmental 'Health Agency . ;e hope we have addressed all the applicable questions. Thank you for your consideration. Addition: Vhen development begins on the surrounding; property that has been annexed into 'r.indsor, we ask that the terms of the cattle .feeding; permit go before the county commisioners for review. As part of the horse boarding, we would also like to keep a maximum of 40 head of roping steers. : These will be confined to the existing pen east of our present arena. AR 1977b30 Roe B 1040 REC 01977630 08/15/84 " : 05 $3. 00 1/001 Bee F 0'_ MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLER & RECORDER WELD CO, CO THIS DEED, Made this 8th day of August Recorder's Stamp 19 84,between INTRAWEST BANK OF GREELEY, N.A. a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws State Documentary�Fee of the State of Colorado of the first part,and Date ADEL.A-5 ..I;4- JOY A. JEFFERSON 1.3..Q _...... 35 Martin Lane, Englewood, Colorado 80110 of the said County of Arapahoe and State of Colorado of the second part: WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 - - - ($130,000.00) DOLLARS, to the said party of the first part in hand paid by the said part y of the second part,the receipt whereof is here- by confessed and acknowledged, bath granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents doth grant, bar- gain,sell,convey and confirm unto the said part y of the second part, her heirs, and assigns for- ever, all of the following described lot or parcel of land,situate,lying and being in the said County of Weld and State of Colorado, to wit: Lot "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 0705-32-4-RE688, according to the Map recorded May 29, 1984 in Book 1031 under Reception No. 1968486, Weld County Records, being. a tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section Thirty-two (32) , Township Seven (7) North, Range Sixty-seven (67) West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado; TOGETHER WITH one (1 ) domestic water well located thereon; AND TOGETHER WITH one (1 ) share of Capital Stock of The Larimer and Weld N. Irrigation Company, a Th V\ (te TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise i LP appertaining, and the reversion or reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, /L 1 \\ right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity,of,in / and to the above bargained premises with the herecitaments and appurtenances. '4 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances unto the c. said party of the second part her heirs and assigns forever. And the said r IntraWest Bank of Greeley, N.A. , partyofthefirepart,foritadt and its successors, doth covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said part y of the second part, her heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of a good, sure,perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and hath good right,full power and lawful authority to ,grant bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and incumbranees of whatever kind or nature soever; SUBJECT TO taxes for the calendar year 1984 and subsequent years and the Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, Reservations , Easements, Rights and Rights of Way of Record, if any; I and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part her heirs and assigns,against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any,part thereof,the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. AJWITNEIS,WHEREOF, The said party of the first part bath caused its corporate name to be hereunto sel#1Le ' Pits.:.e- President, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed,attested by its Pee sad year first above written. t•i?. /� I� 19Vaa _Intr.aWes.t.._Bank._of-__Greeley.,..._N_A...... c s lit..o ff..A.,-.i ii. 0.....2.---- 4/ a y Executive Vice Presidentaat "..„S1',AT`E OF COLORADO, _.....County of. Weld }ss• Tile fgtggfalgg ins trum� /ent�was acknowledged before me this 8th day of� AU gust , 78 � tib9R Y ,;.tat ed--' C1/ 2� as egeO-17t)(- ace Presidentnd �'. �-i` as Secrets of roli {�f 1 t Gecat k ,e/4 fe I/t a corporation. 7 y notarial co talon expires 37/9 117 �••;�U S� .'C4. Witness my ban d official seal. 4, i^. .-•.'12-��'/�o,E of �°� :Yf ..CI --- Notary Pnblte. rr�-^� No.40B. WARRANTY DEED—Corporation.—Bradford Publishing Co.,7R24-1C Stout Street,Denver,Colorado-9$C 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS M�Q ERNEST TIGGES _ S'' #1#` NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ALEX HEIDENREICH ROBERT ALKIRE /IC,WI,' M GARY SIMPSON , HIGHWAY 85 LUCERNE,COLORADO 80848 W.M.M0KAY ,•1(I ,'�4: LYLE NELSON,MGR. P.O.BOX 56 - PHONE 356-3020 April 16 , 1990 RE: Water Service- Jefferson Farms Dear Sirs , This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property : 7681 WCR 74 Meter # 213 1 • X Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2 . X Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied . If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water District within one year from date of this letter , this letter shall . become null and void . Additional comments : Sincerely , NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT J Ly a D. Nelson , Manager LDN/wb • • as n REL. —ADE° EXErst. . .--T1 N 1\10. c..-�aii SHEET 2 OF 2 ,,. 'raw couvrr,� Ire I ..,, r, )11 h I a `, �Q a Sec N 92 on 92, 777N., RN W. I Cr) 4tl k . . r- - _ - --- o o \'i 1 fe C \ \ �- Io 1 Ca r oo' ti' '' , J 1 tors I, Scale , 400' .., 7� � _ _ ,L07A I ti Eco cauNry Rpao 74 � j;„ ■ i Pins found ( � b Pins sot (, LOCATION MAP SCALE. 1"•2000' S. 89'37'47"E, 2637. 341 -- — —-- Center of Sec/ion 32 E, %4 corner Sec. 32 • to e O in kj I c —c N • 41 ate N. • 0Z1 N � y 3 ;o ,51. 89'.3747"E 2578.28' 0 9' 1 Z0.g. W `i a N.G8 30' LOT B N. Niro9'oo^w P/5.00':43 ° x. th ON LOT 'Q • 54. 762 Ac. 9rosS (€) �1 p o N o4•/7'00 �v, ra/.r o ° 2/./93 Ac. gross No - a 589 Ac. RO.K/. tit; � C+ N.2r'o3'oo E. 7$./0' '0.830 Ac. /Ptl.W. m �4. /73 Ac. net 8 2727363 Ac. nor • 8 3. 3 6 Ks k N o/•,s2'oote. moo' ' N to lc N.90'0000'1(1 N $°'3$'oo'w. /48.40' o. 466.7!' :W N 32.2/'00"AU //8.00' S 7Btieree e. o ° e 264.20' b 6 6i Q Q7 'N O e y Cr)\9 rh _J ;� >� �9 N. 06•00'oo•.E 235.$0' t.„ h O (IIL0I N �O h1 N ro•a7'°°E. /43.90' 0 0 ::: .70' - mVf /4.2/' —440.$2'466. /—�/ /V. 90°00'00"Gf! 20(°0, 7d'S.94ha 0'00"E. Poin/ of Beginning WELD COUNTYR0. 74 /'°'so_Sou/hQuor/er SE eon Sec. 32, 7:74/.,R,607/4/, Sec. 32, T. 7N, R.G 764! LMcRAE & SHORT, INC. 12n- eln Avenue PROJECT NO Oreeloy. Colosimo 80631 84 086 ji � � � I 1 ly it •� 171 i S. 1 f ) r1.....-..4.4 » ro 1 1p t F N. 1 I▪ rr " / e r₹ 1 -- y I, xf I • ( n d 1 'i 1 PU Li ' 1 PA✓eme 1 _ u, 1' 2: I 1- I ' t .. i Proposed •_ • ,• •- ; • �,, ]]! Windsor North -` r �:�� - -. Annex• ation _;, I•�.— ,_� .. . —. aa�• r �o '• . Y.C • . __TI }4F Gee/ , ♦ `� • M Ab! CCr- -� / • t• Ca I .. - la 1 .t� ei W � •�1 ! '�. . } ,i .�`rte - '\ (.. . ,. _ .�. • • ♦ t. yl ... ;> . a . , _ .. �. arnr.•. I - o-• �. B 17 do Q •_ - ' _ _ • - _ Windsor Windsor Lab %\\@�`! . 1 \- r P • ' _ �r .Ir V Pi ` • rr- _ 1_. • • rte fe ••••. - _ it ' • •Z Wva.or ••••• ' r 4. y J - Imo• •� - `w •____ +ate_ _— .HE LAPOUD RE RECREATION CORRIDOR • ._ plual*al—bx review purposes only , ^uw4 MabtJ1•anfsrlhltwb4wy/ t .• :• / '• ^,rn aarlmrliaaRrlaloOGatwf�irino.f y _ spa 4<J 1pr ale&ourpra[ � —" •I - -�. "• • sa�' ar=n plx raaM C�4laa.l. - ..f r - n br naves.ml•rnetaw. .r - .t'4n nil arY.ONrgb LAM lirmg•,aYins 'l.. a c^sYVralOalII►nS _ _ s _ - :.c.r<J.9aC on•ae+l4.crone al ranao.,lbalesort -� - _ - •.Mvr Vn lrwarwern• - - -..,...n craw a y Elenraa . - •ta-aAlbt✓rasv.9 ay.4n r•i 4419 anal - - ' q'en.me:...v.r 9ow•r>er•iaae rsllamarQeaom -.E! ' H.m...rr l.e..w..sa _4 - a.sre - �. - Farr Cou►a - - '6aS9V.NTr.wlllla•ra.lY,ra. !` m Q - a..noA�rmnq'nt'_ � • - - �'.\ �\� _ • • fin• � ,.]�j�[y� 1' • !'!•y. ,r ; ♦...a _ •`.ors n �•� .� . • _ -ae Gr cue fins-1"rla.i0Ys - -� • TN4NA\ m ' . ry no bawl'of ma Caw sabr amlMwwla I_J �b Wc05OR ^ •" S ....":1147474... •ea.a - .y\` .. . e..aminit PI w'mmP l.r sCe t • O e Ira ala.Aavizeni O r- - .% - i- n' .r!.YPw� LiF,J...-* 0 /: ' F -'S �mraa rnO�Ecr \ ' " r ►T/ •y I • • a 'I ai •'�31 N S,:.' f,. ._ • ♦• :'1' • h• LEGErq C �' - tilD /• tea r�..ti,•. ; , . !- t i e ul�sT�.a�G 4hoai-w'•ai'acv ., /\ - / T ,4u4o swaaa ewlLc - � .I,"�a -Kf nil Y5 S ii 33 '-'�\-)\<•14;:i\- ,�32 ,r, .aJ t,4 9 ,ww,�..� ,} 33� r -v :pg,, dP'« y" s �1 '$IFFY tg�� . .-", ' 4,b* , c1 � . ur aa., I d k. 149 C; f y E . .��" *`.' �,,� r 'ii 04 a i z , e t '1 - «LAKE �qq :,...:1:!,o won k N. ,r l / ,. �h • i(A I'' .4,44: ,44"It � ��4 pA 4bt� �p y 44 1 Fi 'r ' '4 p" ✓ A4 �'� �3'x` it IL roe, ',k •.»� �4z,. /4 ,�' }r , !uy,...7al tom. k4 A�j 'R,w +kf • �II.•33 Aa,4v+ a , .y r 79 ,.... ' I , ,./ , ,,.... ..,cr.: , ',...,,,24.4;;A; - . i 41•''-''',1' � 4F"„ . ...1 .5� bETS' u •�. 'f _ ""tA ' '++ w. y >se _ 'a�f`a ,_ { m4} I w 'A� 4 a o•e '4'r'4. 'P %, i1Y"j r�i b ! , .. k 14tit 7}2 . '3'gji Pw�1 to j 1. ` e ties fix .. PI ,L -� 3 R^ r. s ,�.illR { I P` .ir 1 t • yy t • .4p'"ryg V ��5 fit- 4 e WIP RRR r, ,l ro;n FM, tr r ti� .41,0,-.1., n ,,,, ' I , . 7k+'. , -•i. ,aim + as �La, e',, r " i 66.2 "5c p A433#., 32 Y� 47 -.1� ® 1r3 i':; '.r 64 y, " d .�t„ '�'.• e. t_., � �.. �ba ' water i` r ,yyL-. , iJ3 4 sl ,, a` ?� �,. h ) n,9n, • • N 3 ;( _�r _t' 47 ' b Cj' 4 MIa w d � x 31 �y 4 . dd F' 24 _ (f ';is *' api e• 4 I. $ r r' • L 3t . i '�✓ -x ' s• �••. :,s .i •S^ ' - .r. `flip , THOMPSO 13 'i y I •r. �4 •:�;�p� i}!!, 4 'P. "44,._ ,, LAKE xF ,P_� '1,4 1? ` c ' a.+S ream,`^ •'1 i,R <1e 51 '-';e # Pam• i 1 1 yl S wlI , r. +91yY.«.. e P Vs .z A' e� ' - t 54 r ', frr• Pi s"Ry +ki 9 w'I l'F �i t: '. ,t, � 4. s C 5 $'� '} A Y � '*t �b5!T', 52 �i< �' d J tt'4 'F 3 4J ' :4;),4 33;....41„ ' ;IS' ,� d• ° �, 8 4 �f 6 ,ic� I s� :.'41 k ,. � �� p "' N4 ₹�.y 13 1 m".4,- '.# \ l'�✓'' 3. 5 ,, ^�..._ t:' /, i -44'., 1D e-LJ4 p n tto-n-i .7/n /q-0 PLODS n aSENDER: Complete iter0E01 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"-Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this car from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services are-available. Consult postmaster for fees and check boxlesl for additional service(s)requested. Z O 1. ❑ Show to whom-delivered, date,J3nd addressee's address. 2. ❑ RFl�strraic„adDalivery H (Extra charge) -J El Addressed Mi> 4. Article N tuber 3. Article re -- �1 '90 0 a g p, c.] u, -Type of Service:uj g a O LL o HARRISON RESOURCE CORPORATION 4n'r� Registeretl Y ❑ Insured v co 769 WHAL-ERS WAY yaCertified ❑ COD Ill '4 ❑❑ Return Racerco - W SUITE A-200 Express Mail ❑ for MerchandMe Q' -O c4▪ P-I -o -FORT COLLINS, CO -80526 Always obtain signature of addressee CC `(S P 6 ., or a TE DELIVERED. al O s$ Om co h • CI ddress (ONLY if 1t1 Y Eli) W co O Z ui 4--_, a4 a' o H 5. Signature — Addressee e,,,, ted de, paid) a o= z Wa N oa v . X a -o Av II 6x u_ // a W 0 3 W m d 6. Sign tur — Age t oil � Czyiz....es,... �O,et P4 HW. aUX "rte O 7. to of Delivery M .., ;�� r cn w >m — _ _ _--- - n., n�nemT ♦J. 7/a5Igo _pc.0060 -• 1 and SENDER: Complete it 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee wilLprovide you the name-of the person delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fees the following servicesare available. Consult postmaster for tees and check boxlesl for additional servicelsl requested. —I 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. _O Restricted Delivery Q (Extra charge) (Extra charge) D^ 2 0 0 3. Article Addressed to:A. 4. Article Number D- W g a 9g - 909 LL g! H Type of Service: fLl �� H o AMIGO FARMS, INC. ❑rp Registered ❑ Insured Ln a- w >jz •U m Ln CAROUSEL, SUITE 100 eo.Lertified, ,R ❑ COD urn rMpptt U o s H .c0 WINDSOR, CO 80350 ❑ Express Mail ❑ for MerchandlN Q at co m O Always obtain signature of addressee Q7 rLI- i i U ---.—_ or agent and DATE DELIVERED. G. o O d• 5. Signature — ddress— 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if a. 0 W d �, N o X A< ,12..1"-'"--r,••• requested and fee paid) V O m vul _ ` � 1 CC 00 o q o Y„ 6. Signature --Agent HOZ o. U X dCV H '" 3n.. 7. Date of Deliver // - 9D PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 *U.SG.P.O.1989-238.815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT •ut yura•.ress in the"•ETL•NT•" S• ce •n the reverse si•e. F.ilure b .. this will .revent this car. fr.m •ein• returne•t•yu.The return recei•t t:e will •r•vi•e yu the name •f the•ers•n .elivere• t. :n. the •ate .f •elivere. .r a•. .n:l fees the f•II•win. services are v:il:•le. C•nsult ••stmaster f.r fees an• check •.xl. f.r a.• •n:l servicelsl re•ueste•. W1. ■ Sh•w t• wham •elivere•, •ate, en• e••ressee's a••ress. 2. ■ •estricta• •elivery —i Z (Extra charge) (Ext , eh,r;of Q co 3. Article Addressed to: t 4. Article Number 2o � � � :_ -qi � r1 o W o< O ^ Type of Service: D-• LL E 7, ti Q JAMES A. AND J9ANN J. OCHSNER ❑ Registered ❑ Insured rD M `al -Z z o 7422 WELD COUNTY ROAD 74 Certified ❑ COD rn WINDSOR CO 80 Express Mail^, Dfleturne Recei. a—▪ Iu >`1 6 P-I vt • .550 p for Merchan U�w CC u z O� Z 330 Always obtain signature of addressee ,.0 �j o Ca - _.. _ or agent-and DATE DELIVERED. url i—F Z, O O 5. Si• ture — Addressee 8. -Addressee's Address (ONLY if W z 6 Q O X ., •%`,' �� - requested and fee paid) c w 6 oq A v ��' ure — 'ant I. - cc cn cnn 41 c-4 z a° 7 Da a of Deliver h r-- 3 ° IGIIne.. ^70—gd _- — PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 *U.S.G.P.O.198&23&815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT a ress in ur c o t is vii prevent t is car from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you theTame of the person delivered to and the date of-delivery. For addmonal fees the following services are available. Consult postmaster for fees and check boxlesl for additional service(s)requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery x (Extra charge) (Extra charge) - {raj 3. Article Addressed tstI ' 4. Article Number Ri© -q I1 C F • r9 p o � in �� Type of Service: a w 8 f a DENNIS M. AND BONITA L. STERK ❑ Registered ❑ Insured �' LL It `al H �¢ 7511 WELD COUNTY ROAD 74 RI Certified ❑ COD N W wo Z ix O WINDSOR, CO 80550 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt U 855 0 EP-I In for Merchantlip Always obtain signature of addressee 2 o? Z c0 - - ------- - —CI a¢0 LL or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 2 z p 5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if a. := 0 00 X requested_tnd fee paid) r0 a W ,r ,a u 6. Si ture — Agent (J1,�f e, —. 12 2 H 3 D V -c. X �) a-'1� 3 Z H q a � 7. ate of Delivery 3 H 3 Wit Lin^ 3 sit — // 9i PS Form 3811, Apr.1989 *U.S.G.P.O.1989338-815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT annpro-, 1425/90 P-4-00.5(-] iplete SENDER: Com s 1 and-2 when additional serviees are desired, and-complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from-being returned to you.The return receipt fee will-provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services-are available. Consult postmaster for fees and check boxlesl for additional servicelsl requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑Mestricted Delivery J (Extra charge) (Extra charge) Q 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number -9Sa �qO, o po D' a 8- Type of Service: 0 JOY A. JEFFERSON ❑ Registered ❑ Insured n� i .A 35 MARTIN LANE ra ¢ ¢ Ce ified ❑ COD e o D^ w >1 2 co ENGLEWOOD CO 130110 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt f) 3-1: O for Merchandise ..D Q = 0.U' Z O I Always obtain signature of addressee u1 u. =T- w 6 U v or agent and DATE DELIVERED. Lrl I--2, � W i " ; 5. -Signature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if a al z h H 0 u°'. 1 X requested_and fee paid) U 'ri O ry s W „ .22- 6. Sig re Agent t COD rl° ou c X .4 Li-4- o rn z 7. 6 Delivery hen w n'- '7,--/e- _ . PS Form 3811, Apr.1989 ♦U.S.G.P.0.1989-236815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • SENDER: Completeolims 1 and_2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return reeeipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date ofSelivery. For�ddrttonal fees the following services are available._Consult postmaster for fees and check boxlesl for additional servicelsl requested. J 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and�ddressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery Q (Extra charge) (Extra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article m CI at� Number 9 ga -9os O W ¢E ES'w ot Type of Service: f= ¢o � AMIGO FARMS, INC. Registered ❑ Insured • W ¢< U A en >z P.O. BOX 6.0 {6 r�y c4rtified COD o- x w,- H MILLIKEN, CO 80543 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return'anti Merchen ise ,0 O '1 o OLn LL S LL cn O_c.) Always obtain signature of addressee _ F 0 o so -- - orsgent and DATE DELIVERED. aoa w0Ow LL i• at a — Ad• s e a U - 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if Y. _L/� requested and fee paid) W O H '2 X 2 e tc H •o 21 a 6, •ig ature — Agent H X p. Z sn ..�J.l s/121.07F-4 11/QS/go fton5A • SENDER: Complete Item and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"-Space on the reverse side.-Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and — the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services are available.xonsult postmaster for fees �l and check boxles)for additionalservicelsl requested. .7 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery 6 (Extra charge) (Extra charge) Gx 3. Article A-ddressed v 4. Article Number o P'ga — 9os -0 O o_, H •n Type of Service: o w o, w KENNETH J. AND MARGARET K. HALL D4 LL a , o ❑ Registered ❑ Insured r wo o w 901 SANDY COVE LANE RI Certified , ❑ COD 11.1 C "< rasa Mail ❑ Return Receipt w wz ¢� FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 P for Merchandise IT- o u,w c a o .. Always obtain signature of addressee ¢O a o r. Fa i - _ -. -.-- or agent and DATE DELIVERED. _D a 2- 1 / 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY i Lfl H zo U H 5. Signature - Addressee X-/ J to II.- o: ti D+ ,-1 0 X requested and fee paid) W � a U y� zq p m ., 6. Sig ture Agent E d U CC w_co o" P X 2 H a - 7. Date of Delivery 14 e at o /r/),-V0 * PS Form 3811,-Apr. 1989 *U.S.G7.0.1989138415 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT cnii., ^-cn-mrn anUrauunnnaa SONicelsr requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery ra charge) (Extra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: -.on' 4. Article Number 9ta -93.7 J ¢ PETER C. AND NANCY -D. HYLAND Type of Service: o >' 2515 FALCON ROAD ❑ Registered ❑ Insured r" p o_, z `,1,:' "' f-Certified ❑ COD n W oa FORT COLLINS, CO 80526 Express Mail ❑ Returniteceipptt 0" ii. Et q -o for Merchanxsee F <o ' Always obtai`nature of addressee ea >z n• cc w 1 U - - - ------- or agent and DATE DELIVERED. z D' U o w 6o 5. Sig e — Addres 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if .) 2 : 2 X requested and fee paid) Ln• O.02_8 2 z z 6. i nature — ent to n o r o ff v a X • ct a U z U• -a o d 7. Date offey efy-t1 1St . ��^'J W ri+ U "CC V'IUL 1 Ce 1J W rrl H yo w� PS Form 3811, Apr, 1989 ♦U.S.G.P.0.1986238-815 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT O. N W sn:: P RASE 2 +HARMONY ROAD' li L .. ;" ... F <- , A ANDSCAPED AREA COMMERCIAL T. 4--vt 13D) ( _.; >, 6.9 `I „� HN 257 LANDSCAPE BUFFE LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1, ' ' 4.4t_t \ , : 1:27 _‘2‘%NOP J A '444y e LANDSCAPED A-RE-A P = Z°.‘ 0L-ANDSCAPED�r AREA 43 ' 1 - O4.11"# Orz%0) I ez4cN 1 ll Vo T V< .1 A y ' B - 0 iel% , 1 - 4C3 , u N 14": ,d el, .."•,) A \ i ) Y-R '''J 4 1 1 1XHIBIr HARRISON RESOURCE -Z r,--4, :'C05'r-%a C`_ -(1 A A (1 D A m r r v.r w - IF • l,. la' jr, ; , 1 a : ,.. tl ..w.Sr f ``,we. `,`j V 3� ".,,Fa.'`.. i. j' 1': $...t../,'*...1x?`p y ., 1 4‘ ‘i '4"::.''z z. � .. 5{� 1 ..C. 61, i' \ j , 1� : I� i , A 3 t I ' x_ \-\ 1T- \1 1--- ...Y' ' . (R Hello