HomeMy WebLinkAbout861122.tiff 0 •
RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR SUBDIVISION - MARTIN AND WILMA
J. OASE
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, on the 19th day of November, 1986, a Preliminary
Plan for a subdivision was submitted to the Board of County
Commissioners by Martin and Wilma J. Oase for approval in
accordance with the Subdivison Regulations of Weld County,
Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Plan concerns the following
described real estate, to-wit:
Nh NE, of Section 11 , Township 1 North, Range
68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having reviewed
the record, including the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the Planning staff, heard all of the testimony and
statements of those present, is satisfied that the submitted
Preliminary Plan conforms in all respects with the requirements of
Section 5 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, and that
approval of said Preliminary Plan would be in the best interest of
Weld County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the subdivision
Preliminary Plan submitted by Martin and Wilma J. Oase be, and
hereby is, approved subject to the applicants complying with the
following conditions, which shall appear as notes on the recorded
plat:
1 . The Wilmar Subdivision shall consist of only 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies shall be performed to predetermine
the location of leach fields for each lot. The final
plat shall reflect the engineered design location of the
leach fields.
:v,: j 861122
Page 2
RE: PRELIMINARY PLAN - OASE
3. The septic system for each lot shall be restricted to
the engineered predetermined capacity, maximum square
footage, and the maximum flow. This information shall
be reflected on the final plat for each lot in the
subdivision.
4. The developer shall provide evidence of a commitment to
abandon the existing septic systems and connect to a
municipal system as soon as it becomes available to the
subdivision.
5. The developer/owner shall petition to be included into
the Dacono Sanitation District. Evidence of the
petition shall be included in the final plat
application.
6. The developer shall provide for the installation of fire
hydrants within the subdivision and along Weld County
Road 12, the number and location shall be determined by
the Longmont Fire Protection District. Hydrants shall
be installed and in service prior to the issuance of
building permits on said lot.
7. A six or eight inch diameter water main to provide a
looped service shall be installed when required by the
Longmont Fire Protection District.
8. The final plat application shall include a letter of
agreement from Left Hand Water Supply Company regarding
adequate water supply for fire protection.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, site plans
shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with
Section 23 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
10 . A Geologic Hazard Overlay permit shall be obtained for
Lots 4 and 5, Block 1 , prior to the issuance of building
permits.
11. A soil erosion control plan which has been reviewed and
approved by the Boulder Soil Conservation District shall
be submitted with the Final Plan application.
861122
• •
Page 3
RE: PRELIMINARY PLAN - OASE
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 19th day of
November, A.D. , 1986 .
�`�/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: (nn v�T� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County C erk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board J cqu Jo C airman
0
B . Go c , Tem
D puty County erk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene . Br ner
EXCUSED DA OF SIGNING - AYE
C.W. Kirby
County Attorney
Yam c
861122
• •
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Ann Garrison that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld
County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NEk of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the
following reasons:
Based on the fact that the Weld County Comprehensive Plan has suggested that
the best kind of economic growth is economic growth that borders current
cities or towns and this particular subdivision would not border any city or
town.
Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Lydia Dunbar
Lynn Brown
LeAnn Reid
Ivan Gosnell
Louis Rademacher
Paulette Weaver
Ann Garrison
Jack Holman
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
861122
a S
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Page 2
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on November 4, 1986, and recorded in Book No. X of the proceedings of the
said Planning Commission.
Dated the 5th day of November, 1986.
C a
Bobbie Good
Secretary
•
November 4, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Case
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NEI of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements
of Section 5-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the
applicant has shown compliance with Section 5-4 of the Weld County
Subdivision Regulations.
The Central Weld County Water District has committed to provide the water
supply to the Industrial Subdivision. The water supply system shall be
provided, consistent with the requirements of Section 8-10 of the Weld
county Subdivision Regulations, pursuant to the public water supply systems
and fire safety requirements.
The site has been determined to be suitable for individual septic disposal
systems by the Weld County Health Department. This determination is
conditional on the following items:
1. A reduction from 19 to 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies to predetermine the locations of the
leach fields on each lot.
3. A specific restriction of septic system capacity, type and
maximum square footage and therefore, maximum flow for each
specific lot.
4. A commitment to abandon the existing septic systems and
connect to a municipal system as soon as it becomes available
to the subdivision.
The septic systems shall be installed consistent with the requirements of
the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations and Section
8-9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
•
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma Oase
Page 2
The site's soil is comprised of Kim Loam, Nunn Clay Loam, and Ulm Clay Loam,
which is classified as prime farmland by the Boulder Valley Soil
Conservation District. The proposed subdivision will not create soil
erosion, soil instability, or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold
water so that it results in an unstable, unhealthy, or dangerous condition
affecting human life or structures.
The industrial uses within the subdivision shall comply with all state and
County Health Department Regulations pertaining to air emission.
The proposal will not cause unreasonable highway congestion. Don Carroll,
Weld County Engineering Department, has reviewed this proposal and has set
forth no objections in a memo dated July 25, 1986.
Based upon the application materials and referral responses, the proposal
will not place an unreasonable burden on the school district, governmental
services providing water, sewage, fire, police, hospital, or solid waste
disposal. The Tri-Area Planning Commission has reviewed this request and
recommends approval.
The proposal will not have an undue adverse affect on the scenic or natural
beauty of the area and does not affect a historical site or a rare natural
area.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is
conditional upon the following:
1. The Wilmer Subdivision shall consist of only 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies shall be performed to predetermine the
location of leach fields for each lot. The final plat shall
reflect the engineered design location of the leach fields.
3. The septic system for each lot shall be restricted to the
engineered predetermined capacity, maximum square footage, and the
maximum flow. This information shall be reflected on the final
plat for each lot in the subdivision.
4. The developer shall provide evidence of a commitment to abandon
the existing septic systems and connect to a municipal system as
soon as it becomes available to the subdivision.
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma Oase
Page 3
5. The developer/owner shall petition to be included into the Dacono
Sanitation District. Evidence of the petition shall be included
in the final plat application.
6. The developer shall provide for the installation of fire hydrants
within the subdivision and along Weld County Road 12, the number
and location shall be determined by the Longmont Fire Protection
District. Hydrants shall be installed prior to any construction.
7. The proposed subdivision shall include a new eight (8) inch
diameter water main to provide a looped service when five lots
have been developed, or within two years, whichever may occur
l = first.
8. The final plat application shall include a letter of agreement
from Left Hand Water Supply Company regarding adequate water
supply for fire protection.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, site plans shall be
reviewed and approved in accordance with Section 23 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance.
10. A Geologic Hazard Overlay permit shall be obtained for Lots 4 and
5, Block 1, prior to the issuance of building permits.
Conditions 1 through 10 shall appear as notes on the Preliminary Plan
recorded plat.
Prior to the Board of county Commissioners hearing, the applicant and/or
developer shall provide evidence that the Colorado Geological Survey review
fee of $135.00 has been paid.
The final plat shall include the required utility service statement with all
appropriate signatures.
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma Oase
6. The developer shall provide for the installation of fire hydrants
within the subdivision and along Weld County Road 12, the number and
location shall be determined by the Longmont Fire Protection District.
Hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to the issuance of
building permits on said lot.
7. A six or eight inch diameter water main to provide a looped service
shall be installed when required by the Longmont Fire Protection
District.
'"“fdt.\.
e
e c vrTtiin •
August 12, 1986
Staff'n•tn,roy
'Weld County Board of
County Commissioners
915 - 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Weld County Planning Commission
915 - 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Re: Case No. S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase: Applicants
Subdivision-Preliminary Plan
Township 1 North, Range 68 West
Section 11: N/2NE/4
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Champlin Petroleum Company owns the oil and gas
which underlies the N/2NE/4 of Section 11, Township 1
North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado, which is
the subject of the above-referenced application for a
subdivision preliminary plan. I note further that
Champlin currently has two wells which are located on
the property which is the subject of the application.
I understand from a telephone conversation on
August 12, 1986, with Gloria V. Dunn, Planner for the
Weld County Department of Planning Services, that the
acreage which is the subject of the application includes
approximately 80 acres and is currently zoned 1-3
(Industrial) . As you are probably aware, the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance provides in Section 34.4.2.7
that oil and gas production facilities are a use by
right within the I-3 district.
In my telephone conversation with the applicant,
Mr. Martin Oase, I have determined that the applicants
do not intend to interfere with Champlin' s rights to
produce oil and gas which is located on the property and
that they have provided in their preliminary plan for
Champlin to have access to its drillsites and production
Company 'T
�, CC O 150-125
- /9
I
Weld County Board of County Commisioners
Weld County Planning Commission
Ausust 12, 1986
Page 2
facilities. Representatives from Champlin have met with
a consultant for the applicants and they have determined
that the access routes and easements which are included
in the preliminary plan are acceptable to Champlin.
In that the applicants have agreed that they will
not interfere with oil and gas operations or production
facilities on the property, it appears that Champlin' s
rights to develop its oil and gas will not be substan-
tially affected by the approval of the preliminary plan
for the subdivision, and, therefore, Champlin does not
object to the application. I wish to note, however,
that the oil and gas estate is the dominant estate and
that Champlin wishes to preserve all the rights that it
has to drill for oil and gas and to produce the oil and
gas which is located under the acreage in accordance
with government rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
Molly�omme Somerville
MS: jaj
cc: W. D. Lancaster
T. W. Lindquist
R. M. Moss
Dave Brody - Amoco
Rocky Mountain Consultants
Martin Oase
9')
AGREEMENT AND COVENANT REGARDING SEWER SERVICES
1. PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are MARTIN OASE and WILMA J.
OASE (hereinafter referred to as "the Oases") , and the COUNTY OF WELD,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (hereinafter referred to as "County") .
2. RECITALS AND PURPOSES. The Oases own the real property described in
paragraph 3 below, and desire to develop such in accordance with Weld
County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. In the absence of services
provided by a sanitation district, the Oases propose that sanitation
needs be met by the installation of individual septic systems. The
County recognizes that sanitation district service, while desirable, is
not available at this time, but the parties agree that to protect the
public health, the Oases shall , within ten days of final plat approval ,
petition for annexation to the Dacono Sanitation District and the
individual systems shall be abandoned in favor of sanitation district
service as soon as such service becomes available. The purpose of this
Agreement is to set forth the terms of that agreement.
3. REAL PROPERTY. The property that is the subject of this Agreement
is legally described as follows:
WILMAR SUBDIVISION,
N-1/2 of NE-1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 68 West,
Weld County, Colorado.
4. OASES' AGREEMENTS.
4.1 The Oases agree to submit a petition for inclusion into the
Dacono Sanitation District within ten days of the final plat
approval . In addition, the Final Plat shall not be recorded until
such petition is submitted.
4.2 The Oases agree that when the lines of a sanitary sewer system,
which is capable of serving the needs of the property, come within
400 feet of the boundaries of the property, the property shall be
connected to said lines, concurrently abandoning forever the
individual septic systems in place. For the purposes of Section
32-1-1004(1)(a), C.R.S. , the parties acknowledge that this require-
ment is necessary for the protection of public health. Further, the
Oases acknowledge that although this statute requiring connection
applies only to special districts, this commitment to abandon and to
connect to a sewer system, is made regardless of the governmental
entity that is operating the sewer system. The parties acknowledge
that the duties hereunder require coordination and planning.
Affirmative steps to connect to a sewer system must be made within
20 days of a notice given by the sanitation system that the lines
are within 400 feet. Affirmative steps include, but are not limited
to, the purchase of taps, engineering and other planning work.
Rai 1 27
5. ENFORCEMENT. The parties agree that breach of this Agreement shall
cause damage that cannot be adequately determined and addressed by
monetary recompense; therefore, it is expressly agreed that this
Agreement shall be specifically enforceable in a court of law or equity
by injunctive or other equitable relief.
6. COSTS. Any owner of any lot or parcel of land in the Wilmar
Subdivision shall be responsible for the tap fees and construction costs
for connecting his or her lot or parcel to the sewer lines. In addition,
should main lines be laid throughout the subdivision, such that individ-
ual owners may connect to them, the owners of each lot shall share
equally the expense thereof. The Oases shall only bear the costs for the
land still owned by them.
7. BINDING EFFECT - COVENANT RUNNING WITH LAND. This Agreement shall
inure to to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties, and their
respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Oases intend
to sell and convey the individual lots in the development and this
Agreement constitutes a covenant running with land, binding all subse-
quent purchasers. A copy of the Agreement shall be recorded in the
records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
8. NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all
purposes if sent by certified or registered mail , postage and fees
prepaid, addressed to the party to whom such notice is intended to be
given at the address set forth on the signature page below, or at such
other address as has been previously furnished in writing to the other
party or parties. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when
deposited in the U.S. Mail .
9. DELAYS. Any delays in, or failure of, performance by any party of
his or its obligations under this Agreement shall be excused if such
delays or failure are a result of acts of God, fires, floods, strikes,
labor disputes, accidents, regulations or orders of civil or military
authorities, shortages of labor or materials, or other causes, similar or
dissimilar, which are beyond the control of such party.
10. PARAGRAPH CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs are set forth
only for convenience and reference, and are not intended in any way to
define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement.
11. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OR ACTION. The parties agree to execute any
additional documents and to take any additional action necessary to carry
out this Agreement.
12. INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT. This Agreement represents the entire
agreement between the parties and there are no oral or collateral
agreements or understandings. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing signed by the parties. If any provision of this
5 a"'>4 d'?''
2
Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, no other provision shall be
affected by such holding, and all of the remaining provisions of this
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
13. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by any party to this Agreement of a
breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be
construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by any party.
14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
Colorado.
DATED: , 1986.
Martin Oase
Wilma J. Oase
COUNTY OF WELD, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
By
Title
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 198 by Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase.
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
Notary Public
3
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 198 by as
of the County of Weld, Department
of Health.
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
Notary Public
SDF:bs
AGMT3
111486
111886(a)
nC;, e.7.7
4
STATE OF COLORADO ) BEFORE THE BOARD
ss. OF DIRECTORS OF THE
COUNTY OF WELD ) DACONO SANITATION DISTRICT
PETITION FOR INCLUSION
1. Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase are fee owners of one hundred percent
of the following described real property which is, or will be in a rea-
sonable time, capable of being served by the Dacono Sanitation District.
2. The legal description of the property sought to be included under
this Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase assent to the inclusion of the above-
described property into the Dacono Sanitation District and pray that the
Board of Directors of said District grant this Petition after public
notice and hearing as provided by law.
CO
Martin Oase
Wilma J. Oase
Address: 4784 Weld County Road 12
Erie, Colorado 80516
Telephone: 654-0867
The foregoing Petition for Inclusion was acknowledged before me this
day of , 198 by
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
Notary Public
SDF:bs
SDFD
111886
• 411
Pti ENTCRY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION
Case Number 44C) —e;)(01-1 : MA 9 Submitted or Prepared
Prior
to Hearing At Hearing
1. Application Pages
2. (Applicationplat(s) / page(s)
3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet
//I(
4. PPS Recommendation /
5. DPS Surrounding Propery Owner Mailing List /
6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List L/ //
7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician ✓
8. DPS Notice of Nearing 1/' —
UP
9. DPS Case Summary Sheet
10. DPS Field Check
11. /7 .4„iyyt, dated O S 37 /9270L1 ff- �/-
12.>-tau+... Cies.,t.td ocil a tic(4Wa A 7-111 v-
13. &&t&t, ed,.ncc, / D a ,2 -3, /9j4 '4«1,"
L..--
14. / I /l O eY 9, 1914. Ac h, ?),...44_,
44„4.
. 1! ti S, w net,r 11 sAAA_ kto ✓ te
16. i s II d cY,Y 7, 8 ...tern 6iY �r
17. /I " At /3, /916 r �'O/ -v 4"tc,„ ‘,"`/
-
18.s77,& ,, L. ,,.,to ✓JA 15, / in41 ,gat, �/.�/^
19. �.a-.c. d ci."•`a / / )' • ???0•4,41-1-k 4/ 4Q 40
20.
fit, ..l. otc i e / 1 /L44�' . l..t.0.r,.‘ fA'�
/! �7/ �r(r e Lei d .;l� �a
hereby certify that the aZ7 items idertif ed herei were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissior
(/
hearing. I further certify that t se items wer forwarded to the Clerk to the
Board's office on // /y 19eYp.
Ciao Plc
Current Planner
STATE OF COLORADO )
)
COUNTY OF WELD )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1''a ' DAY OF yrot, „ 19%l ,
SEAL
%?.La-s.,..\-t).- tae 3
• N ARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1984
r).�.,n w 2P}
u , nnumeernm rvrtnre .,
• •
_ S�
3y 7 -0/1/16 debt")7�4 cjj 856 / 4U-n-' 4ti
ay, Sa 1 / 2 /Z?(r !691 Sir? ,P9
..2S 8 // /s( [i it I/ /
c)42. 4, cxc �� /7617. AbUrn ) S/7 X ' ,1k
a1. : (Lk d e y S(p // oY.-
•
•
•
€ .7.2
411
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 5
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
APPLICANT: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
REQUEST: Subdivision, Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
APPEARANCE:
Jennifer Rodriguez, Planning Consultant, Rocky Mountain Consultants,
represented the applicants. This property is currently zoned Industrial
Three. The applicants have changed the lot configurations from nineteen to
thirteen lots partly in response the the Health Department's recuirements
to allow each lot to be large enough to handle individual septic systems
until the applicants can go onto a public sewer system. The final plat will
locate the individually engineered septic systems. They have met with the
Dacono Planning Commission, Town Board, and Sanitation District. This
property is in Dacono's town growth plan and if annexed, they can go onto
the sewer system. They will comply with all recommendations made by the
Dacono Fire Department. They are in full agreement with the staff's
recommendations, and conditions with the exception of #7. Central Weld
County Water District has guaranteed water for five or six lots for a period
of two years.
Wes Potter reported lots sizes were figured for each pre-engineered septic
system. Therefore the types of industrial uses that can go into this
subdivision will be limited to what each individual septic system can
handle.
Tape 254 - Side 2 •
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved the applicant work out a conservation plan with the
Soil Conservation Service before they can go to the Board of County
Commissioners with a Preliminary Plan. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for 'their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Lee Morrison reported he had spoken with the applicant's counsel. They
discussed concepts and not proposals.
I S
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 6
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked that reading of the staff's recommendations and
conditions be dispensed with and that they be filed with the summary as a
permanent record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Ann Garrison moved Case Number S-264:86:9 for Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a
subdivision preliminary plan be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based
on the fact that the Weld County Comprehensive Plan has suggested that the
best kiva of economic growth is economic growth that borders current cities
or towns and this particular subdivision would not border any city or town.
Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
commission for their decision. Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes, and in
addition to the reasons cited, she has a great deal of concern about the
proliferation of additional septic systems in an area like this. LeAnn
Reid - Yes; Ivan Gosnell - Yes; Louis Rademacher - Yes; Paulette
Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes, for all of the reasons
already stated. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:45
APPLICANT: Monfort of Colorado
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of corporate complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} and part of the NEi of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile north of Greeley City Limits; north of Weld
County Road 64 and west of U.S. Highway 85
APPEARANCE:
Kay Norton, Associate General Counsel, Monfort of Colorado, represented the
applicants. This is Monfort's Corporate Headauarters and has previously
been a nonconforming use. Any expansion of a nonconforming use requires a
Use by Special Review permit to be taken out and that is why they are here.
The expansion is less than ten percent of their space and will include four
new employees. This will be used primarily by computer services. The
building is nearly completed. They applied for the building permit and were
told they
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: August 12, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12, and west of Weld County Road 11
SIZE OF PARCEL: 80.479 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this application is listed in Section 5-4 of the
Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
I-3 (Industrial) zoning currently exists on the property. The applicants
wish to subdivide the site into 16 lots ranging in size from 2.4 acres to 20
acres. A portion of the site is located within a geologic hazard subsidence
zone.
The Department of Planning Services has not yet received referral responses
from the County Health Department and the Colorado Geological Survey.
Copies of recommendations from the Longmont Fire Protection District,
Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District, and County Engineering Department
are attached for your consideration.
The applicant has submitted correspondence addressed to Central Weld County
Water District and the Longmont Fire Protection District (dated August 5,
1986) and Left Hand Water Supply Company (dated August 6, 1986) in order to
demonstrate that progress is being made in obtaining an adequate water
supply to serve the site.
The Department of Planning Services has received one inquiry and no
objections from surrounding property owners regarding this proposal.
DEPAR•"NT OF PLANNING SERVICE
• SY ` PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.44
;; � 915 10th STRE
ANIR�¢�ten rte* ,4 GREELEY,COLORADO 8h
. e.
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on August
19, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a preliminary
plan for a Subdivision in the I-3 (Industrial) Zone District from Martin and
Wilma J. Oase on a parcel of land described as N} NE} of Section 11, TIN,
R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 80.479 acres, more
or less. The property is located approximately .75 mile west of Dacono,
south of Weld County Road 12, and west of Weld County Road 11.
The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the
consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld
County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related
to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley,
Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing
on August 19, 1986.
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the
Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center,
915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400.
Jack Holman, Chairman
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Johnstown Breeze
To be published one (1) time by July 31, 1986
Received by: \ _ ,// i��,y�„�
Date: Gr y O2y 4
• •
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: S-262:86:7 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 22, 1986
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
REQUEST: Sketch Plan for a proposed 16 lot subdivision in an
Industrial-Three (I-3) Zone district
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni NE}, Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
LAND USE: N Weld County Road 12, farmland, oil and gas facilities
E Weld County Road 11, industrial uses
S Farmground
W Salvage yard
ZONING: N Agricultural
E Industrial-Three
S Agricultural
W Agricultural
COMMENTS:
Accesses are to Weld County Roads 12 and 11, gravel-surfaced roads.
Existing businesses are as shown on the plat. Unoccupied land on the site
is irrigated pasture.
Four residences are within one-fourth mile of the property.
By: Vt t. _# .
Gloria . Dunn
Curre Planner
CF).^
-a:.. Wes.
— _' Y,�����s— � �. .. .__ � �-.�
� w i �` x� q :r LS � xe�' yt�'l��e..y-, �'�l n j� • n f � ' ``t ��
� � �� � � 1 ' �; '�'� ��''� ( � � � z�i '°`� �1��
�•tC_��a �J
� U � n k �, .. �a�_ji�'•���� ��`—��9ry- �.`. o.F� � >. .. � �1 ..� i a
_ J � � p � �. b ee p� f. •i� �.X.�:R t° � � �
— �u or. N
— �,'�� '//��• o�~" '��`--C Z.�,� y � '� : • .�ioc�. •�.7 x I • o I v: . �
� r .J .. ' ' : '/ �• e v '• ' ��' •N ' I .
„���tl� �� � ?O`..�` o i': �� ••�� I' �� •� _ ourtor • • f
�a•,T— a �p i . . o
; '� . ,. • • • 5 ; v A ,� .
� � ��.�o ef •�RE�� ��� e � r � • � :2��� •� � �•�. x`� f� , � � � s
'� i. n ./��. I .�a.^ I v�souex
�
/•^a• • MEaO'. �u �
�-.��� '� o ss � � I'. e � •• • �Y x � ..� � � .� � .'.'ll
��/ti
� [� • ,a > . r� � —v �a :� e ! `�`�. � '�
_'1n�i1'�� :C� ��+� 7��� r� �� • •. �. ��
T3N. ��� : � .Yk� p� • o • ' •• j-/ �.. . '; �.
111, � :, � q �v �J'_',� / �� :: :'p� :� '.
rt • �>Ti`v4LE �
e 'P �p 7 b I ��—� "V�^ � � �� 5 v �� L on u ` �
.crvtan a.��. do C�.. � �� s [ 1 • � .a2 L' . .. 't'. :. '. ei . .
�� 'q' <o p � � 1'M g� O ,I� ,� wl.o. Y � �
N��' �Crb:«� q . o � � - �
.� � i: S�ridnn Y �° x 7 tlr x� I /xs`� .i ev x . C 1 x xa ` . ..�� zr x�
a R.td1 �c J .:� q I
r.o.. � . �d.� i. -.p vP / :y o p � ;1�I
7,�p'= poV�� C• l�l If J �` �F i�E d� • ]l ) � ^ �_)� I� � ���t I, )>
} �dLFBOUA bONOS�7 yp / •\ .,u�
��i ., •V'a'^ J .
� K. atelE I REL.� ✓V `M'.%'��M� . \ � 5 ..iT �
aa
� � �_' ��', G . �_.� , ' °r• ' �. - �'�,. -
���G/ i v- .J_� �� "" a ��i r e • � � � � a � > �•
� • �',� `�-�-
Z F sr1 Y �0` r r . G / � a �. A .
.o.�.o.. , , ,.� : � �:k e
�,�,... • aa . .��. _ .. . . ,• , .
���� �� � � � � �.� ��,,,.o � � {,a. � ��,: �': l.�
� ' '� N � �• z i r MILL� — o �, ° '� ] + +
lnux[� D_
�„-t I i �y � �1.°; to��/ �
O • cet� . � - � l o : , . ,..� �.��` � �•. . .
:+� .�. ' _-.� \ ; `�ey��ep� , p ` ' c ` �
�ar. �� o.. .. .i .g ��� ��� '[wiA7[� . � �e �. .ou. . � � �n \
U . o . .. ' e � ./ .� �.:, , c � e,¢y i ��
P�` a � : .c.:, � � \ . r i��r. � I� � ..
T2N. � 4,- � �°� �.� r-- � � � . .I �n � .
) i J - �,i �� (� p d � �'�.�
.� � ,./ s�� ,; ��.��•� � � �. , �, _, � _> >( ` . �
�f: � q,��e'� '� - + ,p a �... r l � ,.� d o�� >
:
• �: C a �.. � • ' E l.NF � J . ' . � � • .� •a�
._ j 2 z�, ���`� ���I�i{I' //( xi � e� ; 1�� � � I� ou��� '�fxf� ^�� .
� /i�j Y � � •j� O��� al'�Jy N0� � � r I�! �o � � l
.1�� � • }f�/0 /f5 J � I al \ � 4.
•p�C• C�1�y: Y 1 ,� -vA[oia�.cc , ', • 9k , p�cr � $,� kR-.'
� p� ( i�� �wti. _ I' . .
ex 4 �e e. �e � v n / y.` . \�- n F
h .v. .�.����, p �
� tl �( �� w<
,nvtai.� :.r.:�� .� l ,.�M2pr� �� �F/ I
� -q.'. . j� �' .�o.�oc. �r n.f� 'cacorv �`� J� � W ..c..ue� .� � 1. onrwvr�
F� � � y ( " �/ / c � ee�s j� �o_ p��i: .� a u� �' o.ews.
0 � o, � �� 2 • Y � .
� J . / . . .�. , I ,:
i
� � _ .�� � � . ` � x , �rr �� �- � � .�.
w — � '���.d� � n $°���' '�E'�� � �f = � I� `�= � ..,' ;
G tl . � . � ��� ,. .t.' E3 .
a.� p,� , .� a.*, x. t �i i..�"`� i �I � � � � - L� ' ..,
� � ��;.0 � �• ti� :'t :• �� �+• �.9,�y,r .� ' i u u� , • r •• . �
�' r ` ��4Wilqla/� /'d � a �r � , �� /'�,�.
J _,�yp n � l � � III �x.4' •Iw � u� G � ��• � � 1� ; �
'_�.1q E c 'v e 1 p� '0� .�.�� i` � .
i
or i ' ��' . .rG ,LIZ !�/� � G , M A� �I� ¢. `_ , , 1 ../ .
T I N.,: "�-v . . � � a" f � . . .�!✓ R3� i
G L fe ��k IG. G � � r 1 .� � e� yyy a^�
� � xo � /�� xx �v� �� �� i n 0 �xo � �. u 4;���� ,�'�.e� � �� r 1z��ro� � e��
T G a L• • °• I 79 • I
_ � I�:-.: � L �:oa� 1 i fc-� .Y ,. �i .L� G . � � wn�r rFraec�iG/ !� B o
� G'4 .C,✓��C� F � "1, Y� o �r.v ..SA�ai Q
. .O ^i . : ' �= ?, i � i� /' Y oc` .`�. . .4G . , :.� . .J`v^ i kl. 1 ')�� Q° 1 �f-a
�.r � � � yC✓ .P' c Y � d p��Gi p' � .wn• � �( 6 T � ,� {
�F � v a C• . � eo �y. ' � n � n 4� x�\ q e 1'��. �•� • n � �� • n �
� �a � � l� Y( J
m �' I '� '� ..-..r'Rc0.n.�� G b � �� i`w'� � °j � rt rz + `
- � . .�- ' i � 'a 'c,� �.�u• � ��wps� I :' � �.
�: � . � �.C �✓ . i C � � � �,� � � • • �
' u Iv � � ( v C n p a0�q » � Y v C,7 e� v � A 4 � — e
�� ! Y 1 � � � G Y l i 4 I '. � •�(�
i •
_. �3 � I_ 'J tl.eGSE •G: � ' ,4� 'v G , � i.l _��.. ";� r%l�° �:r.,.
��� A � ��� '� R68W�' .H`��;J M F !i� ' F ' � " F67r , i u 5 , �/ /eT� A � �R.
W ,.1�`;� .r, �+'1
� . . . A D A � M S . . . . �_a..i.Y...__1'•,1. ..
t - -UDC .
l I i - I
2
• I ) 5ou aer Van /•
. -I =—=, F •. 5.
per_
,0 a .
1 .,� I 1 ,,/ I Minv s.
t
° . . ,,—
( �1
tJ, 1 on
� _ C / - ----_.____IX
1
�' / $6 • 7_,...7—:-J ___--
Well 1 / /r� t se V il
1 ' °YI
_ -
<0 / \ ) (\-------- ____., / ,
` � �� a5••�.,,1 • S/03 Jl
\ I iii.-i 1, , I 71 1 I ,
14 ��_� C.- �' ---
, I
I
r - r 18 ` 1 .
"- /� / �,7_ _ ��� /a 7----�
1 / _ _— �1
1 n
ar_
r
50� ti � \ .`l� I
��
_ n. r y - - -- �soes - - 5�°
�
/ _ . 0 I __
� \ I/ • if • 5 ,; i I -
of
‘i/ /���/ ;/ .—� -a7lji. _
�� 6M — - '
'23 secs > 1
trains
/ 19
/5150\ r •.1.- .‘-------nt °
- Clew' ; noel ' '' �" / .r 1 — � 1 I
'�•v; . \ F4c;
^ - Y"iryi? i Jy1 < c4 f s
1
si**'�S',I+;S�*ndry`��,,;'V''"`s°.... �'�w ` •A�,.�Z�, �i. '+V� � ����+�' rv* ���C7P4.04 P< � _ ;,u`atg°s
•
c.
WELD t20. ten /2
272
p G
Ste244-
4 of, \
•
cCe
O53
'I
_ H
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: Martin and Wilma J. Oase CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 11, 1986
NO SR NR NO SR NR
X Weld County Health Dept.
✓ X Engineering Department
✓ X Tri Area Planning Commission
c/o Rebecca Marker
P.O. Box 363
/ Frederick, CO 80530
Y X Louis J. Rademacher
Weld County Planning Commission
13184 Weld County Road 13
/ Longmont, CO 80501
y X Longmont Soil Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road
Box D
Longmont, CO 80501
v// X Longmont Fire Protection District
c/o Captain Wm. Emerson
9119 County Line Road
Longmont, CO 80501
Ve X Weld County Sheriff's Department
c/o Rick Dill
X Colorado Geological Survey
c/o Lou Ladwig
1313 Sherman Street
Room 715
Denver, CO 80203
NO=No Objection
SR=Specific Recommendations
NR=No Response
•
gUGoc1986 I �'J
FILING NUMBER: S-2.64:8 IIII f+ DATE OF INSPECTION: '- V- 06"
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. '6 54. 04MYnt tilARMiis00,.
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: pN1 NE' of Section 11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County
LAND USE: N
E lAteeetejne-tfrafAd
rt
ZONING: N cc
;
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of E
Dacono; south of Weld County Road 12 and west S Orua A.C
of Weld County Road 11 w
COMMENTS:
BY Clie.e0f lr GS t't• -
Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road, Box D - Longmont,Colorado 80501
August 1, 1986
Ms. Gloria V. Dunn, Current Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case Number S-264:86:9 - Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Dear Gloria:
The Oase proposed subdivision development is on Kim loam 1-3%, Kim
loam 5-9%, Nunn clay loam 1-3%, and Ulm clay loam 3-5% slopes. The
Kim loam 1-3% slopes and the Nunn clay loam are prime farmland. These
two soil types make up approximately 75% of the land development area.
There is no erosion control plan for dust control during and after
construction. Wetting busy roads will help keep dust to a minimum
during construction and permanent grass seedings along borrow pits of
roads will eliminate excessive erosion after housing is completed.
There are some construction limitations which will need special attention
during construction. The Nunn clay loam has a moderate to high shrink-
swell potential which may cause foundation cracks. The Ulm clay loam
and the Nunn clay loam contain a lot of clay which may cause problems
with basement construction. Also these two soil types have a slow permeability
rate which will need attention if septic tank absorption fields are to
be used for sewage disposals.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this land development proposal.
If we can be of any further assistance, please give us a call. .
Sincerely,
Barry L. Sinkey
President
BLS:rah
r,Uu 05 1980
Weld Co. Planning Cummissil
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 1�7
•
� � C
/ C ' LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
,/r '
�v !s
y1e 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
�orrcrtuM David Bierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec,Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Russ
Fire Chiel Director Director Director Director Director
June 30, 1986
Ms. Susan Ruptash, Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107
Longmont , CO 80501
Dear Ms. Ruptash,
This letter will document our recent meeting regarding
the Wilmar (Oase) Subdivision. As we discussed, the April
11 , 1986 leffgr-to you from Central Weld County Water
District (CWCWD) leads us to believe that a firm cornmittrnent
to upgrade the existing water system is not likely in the
near future.
Therefore, we require an on site water supply of not
less than 300 , 000 gallons of water for fire protection. This
supply source could be an elevated metal storage tank ,
gravity flow type or a ground level tank or an embankment
supported, rubberized, fabric suction storage tank. All
require automatic fire pumps , valves , etc. The water supply
K_ could still come from CWCWD. The water level in the tank
must be maintained automatically with pipe size to fill the
tank within eight hours.
in addition, the covenants of the development shall
require:
1 . Property owners to contact the fire district. prior
to any plans for development being submitted to Weld
County Planning Department ,
2 . All proposed changes in occupancy to a structure to
be coordinated with the fire district ,
3 . Structures to be protected by automatic sprinkler
systems and standpipe systems ,
4. Restrictions of occupancy to ordinary hazard and
below,
5. Building height to be limited to 35 feet or three
stories ,
6. Building construction types be limited to type
1-FR, type II-FR, II one hour, and type 111 -one hour ,
7. Floor area limitations to the requirements of the 1985
Uniform Building Code Table 5-C.
Some of these restrictions are based upon the type of
occupancy presently anticipated and could vary depending on
individual occupancies in the development . Feel free to
contact us again whenever you have comments or questions. 8 iD g
C _. • Sincerely, 2r91986
6V" ic '�' Weld Co. Planning Commissio
William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal , LFPD pci •' r
• •
a 1` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE
PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT. 44
1
+;;;;����,,,, 915 10th STRE
GREELEY,COLORADO 806
I.
COLORADO • CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is ,
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within fourteen (14) days (but wish to
do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation.
1. Xx We have reviewed this request and find that the request
does (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons. Well planned usage of land and
within guidelines of County ordinance and our compre-
hensive plan .
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons:
3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
4. Please refer o the enclosed letter.
•
Signed Agency: Tri -Area Planning Commission
Secretary
Date: Au ust 6 , 1986
Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter.
Glor a . Dunn RUG 07 1986
Curr n Planner
Weld Co. Planning Commission
w tatla : Wa vk 'V, \\
DEPARIDENT OF PLANNING SERVICE
c •
y �s
r,, 11
PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4
t�l • 915 10th STRE
� .4 j GREELEY,COLORADO 80
'-A,
•
COLORADO CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TiN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
`/
1. J( We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.x
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
mitted prior to
3. P e refer// t))o the enclosed letter.
Signed: (n ) /11,04,4.4/IL Agency: lI�/7 /iyrn4 !`;0 D
oUL 311980
Gloria V. Dunn
Cure, Planner Weld Cu. Planning gumnasswou
'7Nert to nn,hrinnaI Itt4pac•4- 4.x.11+cIpaW 6�E uucLus�-rcw1 Ice c4eue)�v to
v, 1 f1iu:� Ana0. a4 cUsGr t&4 L'¢Aevti n ,(1.eA 7. c• .^ �>
if • •
Gloria V. Dunn
To Current Planner Date July 25, 1986
L
COLORADO From Donald R. Carroll , Administrative Manager - Engineering Dept.
subject: Martin and Wilma J. Oase for subdivision - S-264_86:9_ __..
We have reviewed the preliminary plan and have no problems .
In the final plat we would like the following items addressed:
1. The internal road cross section - is it going to be paved,
gravel with shoulders, or borrow pit ditches with culverts
at all accesses.
2. Applicant needs to address the access roads - upgrades
leading to the property for upgrading and dust control
with a road maintenance agreement.
3. Culvert size 15" C.M.P. Min. at all accesses.
4. Water line out of roadway. Relocate to borrow pit or shoulder
area. Taps to each lot.
5. Paving is required for public street.
6. A "Master Drainage Plan" that addresses retention will be
required. Subsequent site plans that handle drainage in
accordance with the "Master Plan" will be required for
individual lots.
DRC/bf
Ji. 2., 1923
Weld Cu. Planning Plf�� Commission
• DEPAR•ENT OF PLANNING SERVICE
s1 al PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.44
`.. 915 10th STRE
Pr i
0 tit- 1
GREELEY,COLORADO 80E
re
3 tl I €
..,._ .
r y
__
•
COLORADO CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986 n`�J(.)
pg.66, �1, ✓C.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ..--'--
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan. The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter. ,
1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted prior to
3. n Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: i✓tk.t + le. 4 Agency: Date: �• a S- 8c
1Gloria V. Dunn
Cu Planner
ren Planner
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
<rI'
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107•Longmont, CO 80501•(303)772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line 665-6283
August 5, 1986
Mr. Dale D. Olhausen
Central Weld County Water District
2235 2nd Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80637
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Mr. Olhausen:
Thank you for meeting with us yesterday concerning the Wilmar Subdivision.
We wish to request your standard letter of commitment to serve. We would appre-
ciate receipt of same prior to the August 14, 1986 Weld County Utility meeting.
We would like to pursue your suggestion of a two phase program of improvements
to the system. Phase I would involve the installation of a pressure regulating
valve and flow meter at existing connection between CWCWD and Left Hand Water
Supply Company at I-25. This would be regarded as a temporary measure. When a
set number of lots have been developed (5 to 6), or within a limited time period
(two years), the developers would be required to participate in the funding of a
looped 6" main or renegotiate the District's commitment to serve. Alternate
approaches may become feasible should other development occur nearby. The
developer' s participation would be in the form ;of modified up-front Capital
Improvement Fees rather than actual construction costs associated with the
improvements. Engineering, design, construction and coordination of the
improvements would be the District' s responsibility. We would appreciate your
suggestions at this time regarding the contents of an agreement between CWCWD
and the developers so that we may verify the Fire District' s support of the
project. We have made initial contact with Left Hand Water Supply Company
regarding the Phase I connection.
We wish to clarify the number of taps likely to occur. Lot 1 , Block 1 (20 acre
parcel ) has an existing tap that is adequate for their projected future needs.
oE�E�
1,UG 07 1986
Weld Co. Planning Commission
Kiel
Page 2
Mr. Dale D. Olhausen
Lot 8, Block 2 is currently (and proposed to remain) a storage yard and will not
likely ever require water service.
Thank you for your continued efforts to resolve these issues.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
cc: Martin and Wilma Oase
Captain William Emerson, Longmont Fire Protection District
Terry Magnusen, Left Hand Water Supply Company
•
• •
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
r, .
500 Coffman Street. Suite 107•Longmont,CO 80501•(303) 772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line: 665-6283
August 5, 1986
Captain William Emerson
Longmont Fire Protection District
9119 County Line Road
Longmont, Colorado 80501
RE : Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Captain Emerson:
We met with Central Weld County Water District on August 4, 1986 and they have
suggested the following course of action.
PHASE I : Construct pressure regulating valve and meter at existing connection
of the CWCWD 6" main to Left Hand Water Supply Company to allow water to automa-
tically flow to subject property upon pressure drop. This is considered a tem-
porary measure until approximately 6 lots are developed.
PHASE II : Construction of a new (6" diameter minimum) main as shown on attached
sketch to offer looped service to the site.
CWCWD is currently preparing draft agreements outlining these improvements. We
will forward same to you upon receipt for your comments.
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
541,441114 .
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
Enclosure
o I ) ) \\7
AUG 07 1986
Weld Cn. Planning Cummfsslel
• •
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107-Longmont,CO 80501•(303)772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line: 665-6283
August 6, 1986
Ms. Terry Magnuson
Left Hand Water Supply Company
P.O. Box 210
Niwot, Colorado 80544
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Terry:
This letter follows your telephone conversation with John Cummings of our office
regarding the Wilmar Subdivision near Dacono.
PROJECT HISTORY
PROJECT: Wilmar Subdivision, 80 acres, 16 lot industrial subdivision.
OWNERS: Martin and Wilma Oase.
LOCATION: N#, NE*, S11 , TIN, R68W, Weld County, Colorado.
STATUS: Planning Commission to review Preliminary Plat on August 19,
1986. Anticipated final approval September 1986.
WATER SUPPLY: Central Weld County Water District.
CWCWD does not currently have good supply to the site. Future plans include
installation of a looped main to improve service. Due to the high immediate
costs of the improvements, we are seeking a temporary interim solution to allow
some lots to be developed prior to the main installation.
We have met with Mr. Dale Olhausen of CWCWD and he has suggested installing a
temporary pressure regulating valve and meter at the existing connection between
CWCWD's 6" main along the north edge of Section 11 and LHWSC's 6" •
The valve would automatically open upon loss of pressure in CWCWD'
provide water ( i .e. , in case of fire demands). This temporary mea A
AUG 07 1986
Weld Co. Planning Commission
• •
Page 2
Ms. Terry Magnuson
in effect for approximately two years, or until six (6) lots were developed.
The developer would bear the cost of installing the PRV and meter.
We have enclosed background letters and maps for your information. Please feel
free to call myself or Dale Olhausen if you should need any further information.
We would appreciate any help you can offer in expediting this matter. We are
hoping to have a preliminary response from you prior to our August 14, 1986
Utility Meeting with Weld County. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
cc: Mr. Dale Olhausen, CWCWD
Enclosures
4-5116
F*
•
MAILING LIST
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Richard Cosslett, Etal
c/o Longmont National Bank
5th and Coffman
Longmont, CO 80501
Roy H. and Beverly Carlson
11176 Pearl Street
Northglenn, CO 80233
Cheryl Marie Leppla
c/o Raleigh & Leppla
3045 California Avenue Sw.
Seattle, WA 98116
Edward and Okla Eckert
c/o Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
Maybelle M. , Mary Irene, & Annie Wright
Box 94
Erie, CO 80516
Clifford R. and Vera L. Haller
4651 Road 11
Erie, CO 80516
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
William N. and Ann M. Stonebraker
5401 North Federal Boulevard
Denver, CO 80221
Azalea Farms
1005 Riverside Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dan E. Ryan
8115 West 63 Avenue
Arvada, CO 80004
MINERAL OWNERS
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Champlin Petroleum Company
A Delaware Corporation
640 Baseline Road
Brighton, Colorado 80601
- Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. F,Y'; `'"'
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665.6283
November 14, 1986
Captain William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal
Longmont Fire Protection District
9119 County Line Road
Longmont, CO 80501
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Captain Emerson:
This letter is a follow-up to our phone conversation today regarding your August
15, 1986 referral on the subject project. You had requested two modifications
(shown below in capital letters) to the course of action as proposed in Sue
Ruptash's letters of August 5, 1986.
1. OBTAIN A LETTER OF AGREEMENT FROM LEFT HAND WATER SUPPLY COMPANY (for the
temporary cross-connect)
The LHWSC monthly board meeting was held Monday, November 10, 1986. They
had not yet received a formal request from CWCWD to consider this request.
Mr. Dale Olhausen, Manager for CWCWD has been asked to write this request
and LHWSC should take it up at their December meeting. Approval of this
cross-connect is tantamount to the developer's request for Phase I water
supply and fire protection. Since this project is only at the Preliminary
Plat stage, we request that you allow us to proceed into Final Plat stage,
knowing that LHWSC will discuss it at their December meeting and that,
without an agreement, the developers will not obtain Final Plat approval .
You also indicated that for your approval at Final Plat stage, we would have
to provide you with the engineering calculations to show sufficient volume
of flow could be provided to fight a fire in the Phase I condition.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 8-INCH DIAMETER WATER MAIN TO PROVIDE A LOOPED
SERVICE, WHEN 5 LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED OR WITHIN 2 YEARS, WHICHEVER MAY
OCCUR FIRST.
In a letter dated July 25, 1986, Dale Olhausen stated that CWCWD will be
seeking $96,000 in plant investment fees from Wilmar Subdivision. In a
phone conversation with him November 10, 1986, he said that this fee would
Vii.. f °in,
Letter to • •
LCaptain William R. Emerson
Page 2 of 2
cover the cost of either a 6" or an 8" main. The way your stipulation
reads, the Oase's would be required to construct the water line in two years
even if none of the lots have been sold. You agreed that this was not your
intent and that, instead, you wanted the ability to evaluate each proposed
use within the project as to its fire protection needs. The loop might be
needed sooner than two years or not until later from the standpoint of the
LFPD. We are in agreement to proceed on the basis of reviewing with you the
fire protection need of each proposed use and when you and/or the CWCWD feel
the loop is warranted, the fees will be paid by the developers.
3. Provide for the installation of fire hydrants within the subdivision and
along WCR #12, number and location to be determined by L.F.P.D. hydrants
shall be installed prior to any construction.
To clarify "hydrants shall be installed prior to any construction" the
intent is to have fire hydrants installed and in service only as each lot is
sold and prior to construction on said lot.
If you are in agreement with the conditions of this letter, please indicate so
by signing below. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
John B. Cummings, Jr., P.E.
cc: Dale Olhausen, CWCWD
Jim Dickey, LHWSC
. Martin and Wilma Oase
CONCURRENCE BY:
4-5116
IP
Wi Yam R. Emerson Date
Fire Marshal
Longmont Fire Protection District
r co.1 4. ,i
- -4,irofi ....„ \ oo • •
City of Dacono, Colorado
Lgj
)) November 18 , 1986
Department of Planning Services
Weld County Centenial Center
915 Tenth Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
To Whom It May Concern:
Martin Oase of Wilmar Subdivision, WCR 11 and WCR 12, has in-
quired about annexing 80 acres plus or minus, to the City of
Dacono. The proposed zoning is I - 3 . Based on this informa-
tion, Mr. Oase was informed that his property will positively
be considered in the long range planning of annexations to
Dacono.
Mr. Oase' s issue was looked at in .a positive light by the Dac-
ono Planning Commission.
Thank you.
respectfully,
C-
obert C. Renner, Mayor
- City of Dacono.
512 Cherry Street • P.0.Box 186 • Daeono, Colorado 80614 • Metro- 826-1266 • Local -833-2317
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: October 28, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12, and west of Weld County Road 11
SIZE OF PARCEL: 80.479 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The applicant feels that they have satisfied the concerns of the Colorado
Geological Survey and the Weld County Health Department. Since so much time
has passed since the original land-use summary was sent out, I have included
it with past correspondence in this land-use summary.
mtmoRnnD
winkTo Debbie deBesche - Planning Date October 27, 1986
COLORADO From Wes Potter - Health Protection Services 4/1
deg—
subject: Wilmar Subdivision
The applicant has submitted a revised plat with a very specific
proposal for septic service on the site. These revisions include:
1. A reduction from 19 to 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies to pre-determine the locations
of the leach fields on each lot.
3. A specific restriction of septic system capacity, type
and maximum square footage and therefore maximum flow
for each specific lot.
4. A commitment to abandon the existing septic systems
and connect to a municipal system as soon as it becomes
available to the sub-division.
Based upon these changes in the application, we recommend for
approval so long as they are a condition of approval by the
Board of County Commissioners.
0CT 29 1986
Weld Co. Planning Cuansissiou
e.
• •
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc T- ,
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282
cca
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283
October 24, 1986
Mr. Wes Potter
Director, Health Protection Services
Weld County Sanitation
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Mr. Potter:
Enclosed you will find two copies of the revised preliminary plat for the Wilmar
Subdivision. I have highlighted the revisions which include:
- a reduction from 19 to 13 lots
- preliminary locations for leach fields
- a table indicating the capacity, type and maximum square footage
for the leach field on each lot.
Please review this information and contact me if you have any questions. Thank
you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTA TS, I//NC._ xnJennifer V. odriguez, A.I .C.P
cc: L. R. Ladwig \ _
Debbie DeBesche
2,, 1986
Welt Ca. Navin 4aasission
allt dine" ter of cot \\ "AO()
tioP
�1( 9O
w O
RICHARD D.LAMM \'�\< * JOHN W. ROLD
GOVERNOR ♦ \ M` * DIRECTOR
\1876 '
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET
DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611
October 23, 1986
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
On August 13, 1986 the Colorado Geological Survey sent you an invoice in the
amount of $135.00 for the review on WILMAR SUBDIVISION. As of October 22,
1986 we have no record of payment.
Would you please advise why payment has not been made, or when you expect to
be able to submit payment?
Thank you for your assistance in clearing up this matter.
Sincerely,
auziv.
Chris. Avila
Accounts Receivable
File No. WE-87-0001
Invoice No, 167021
1 ' :7 \\ 2, 1986 ,
GEOLOGY
STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE Weld Co. Nam111+k lal.moissan
• •
October 21, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
The Department of Planning Services staff recommends that this request be
continued to allow additional time for the applicant to resolve the problems
identified by the Colorado Geological Survey in its letter of August 13,
1986, and the Weld County Health Department in its memorandum of August 15,
1986. The applicant has been working to resolve the problems and expects to
be prepared to present this request on November 4, 1986.
The staff recommends that this application be continued to the November 4,
1986, Planning Commission Meeting.
_2,7
. .
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: October 14, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma Case
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12, and west of Weld County Road 11
SIZE OF PARCEL: 80.479 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this application is listed in Section 5-4 of the
Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
This request was continued to October 21, 1986, to allow the applicant time
to resolve the concerns of the Weld County Health Department and the
Colorado Geologic Survey regarding the method of sewage disposal. The
applicant has been in contact with the Department of Planning Services, but
additional information has not been submitted.
•
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 4 spa ,:. «r.
fw
5 I
a;aisi v 'ft 44
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 s"
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line 665-6283
Gill 2019$6
October 9, 1986
Weld Co. Manning I;ummissioe
Ms. Debbie deBesche
Planner
Department of Planning Services
Weld County
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Debbie:
As a follow-up to our conversation of October 8, 1986, I am writing to request
that the Planning Commission's review of the Wilmar Subdivision be continued
until the November 4, 1986 Commission Meeting.
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. is working diligently to resolve the question
of septic systems with the Weld County Health Department. Additional soils
testing has been done by Mr. Ed Paas of Empire Labs and his report is enclosed. A
meeting has been set up with Mr. Wes Potter to discuss the results of the additional
testing. We are hoping to resolve this issue with Mr. Potter and move forward
to the Planning Comnission; for this reason we are requesting a continuance
until the November 4, 1986 meeting.
Please contact either Ms. Jennifer V. Rodriguez or myself if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
Barb Barb Brunk
BB:bke
cc:Martin Oase
.
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 't r
I'
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 a i
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283
September 12, 1986
Ms. Debbie deBesche
Weld County Planning
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Case Number 5-264:86:9
Dear Debbie:
We wish to respectfully request a continuation of Case Number S-264:86:9 to
Tuesday, October 21, 1986 to allow time to resolve the concerns expressed by the
Weld County Health Department and the Colorado Geologic Survey regarding the
method of sewage disposal .
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAINCONSULTANTS, INC.
OC ,
S. M. Rutpash
o Ia41?t
Weld Co. Planning commission
• •
Date: September 2, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
The Department of Planning Services staff recommends that this request be
continued to allow additional time for the applicant to resolve the problems
identified by the Colorado Geological Survey in its letter of August 13 and
the Weld County Health Department in its memorandum of August 15. The
applicant has been working to resolve the problems and a meeting with the
staff has been scheduled for September 5, 1986, to submit additional
information.
The staff would recommend that this application be continued to the
September 16, 1986, Planning Commission Meeting.
• •
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: August 26, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N} NE} of Section 11, TIN. R68W of the 6ch P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
•
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
SIZE OF PARCEL: 80.479 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this application is listed in Section 5-4 of the
Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
This case was continued from August 19, 1986, to allow the applicant time to
resolve concerns from the Colorado Geological Survey and Weld County Health
Department.
The Department of Planning Services staff has not received any additional
information.
• •
Date: August 19, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
The Department of Planning Services staff recommends that this request be
continued to allow time for the applicant to resolve the problems identified
by the Colorado Geological Survey in its letter of August 13 and the Weld
County Health Department in its memorandum of August 15. The applicant may
also investigate other alternatives to providing adequate sewage disposal
facilities to the subdivision.
The staff would recommend that this application be continued to the
September 2, 1986, Planning Commission Meeting.
• 0 ,
Empire Laboratories, Inc. P.O.Box 503 • (303)484-0359
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 8 MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes • Fon Collins,Colorado 80522
October 7, 1986
D
Rocky Mtn. Consultants500 Coffman, Suite #107 OCTJut 21986
Longmont. CO 80501
Attention: Mrs. Jennifer Rodriguez Wald Co. Ranniryg o yiss)n4
Re: Wilmar Subdivision
Weld County, Colorado
Gentlemen:
Our firm has performed a total of twenty-five (25) percolation tests and
twenty-one (21) exploratory borings at the above-referenced subdivision.
The percolation tests were performed on June 7, August 28 and October 6,
1986. The exploratory borings were drilled to depths.of eight (8) to nine
(9) La and the perLolatiOn Irides were drilled Yu depths of two and one-
- half (2f) feet. Percolation tests were- performed in the field after a twenty-
four (24) hour soak period. The purpose of this investigation was to
determine the suitability of this proposed subdivision for individual septic
systems. The purpose of the percolation tests on October 6, 1986 was to
define areas within the confines of revised lots which are suitable for
standard septic systems. Our last investigation concentrated on the west
half of the subdivision where some high percolation rates were recorded in
previous investigations.
The total number of lots in this subdivision has been reduced from sixteen
( 16) to thirteen ( 13) since our original investigation to help assure meeting
the Weld County requirement of no more than twenty-five percent (25%)
evapotranspiration systems in new subdivisions. It is our understanding
that two (2) lots in this subdivision already have standard septic systems. .
The soil conditions at this site consists basically of approximately six (6)
inches of clayey topsoil overlying sandy silty clay with occasional layers of
silty sand. Claystone or sandstone bedrock was encountered in several
borings at depths ranging from six and one-half (63) to eight and one-half
(83) feet below the ground surface. No subsurface groundwater was
encountered at the time of our investigation to a depth of eight (8) feet.
However, water levels could fluctuate on this site due to seasonal variations
and irrigation demands. Please refer to the enclosed boring logs for a more
accurate description of the soil conditions.
,73,...9_14)::-.0-
:( '
\N' Branch Offices
P.O. Box 1135 P.O.Box 1744 P.O.Box 10076
f j, Longmont,Colorado 80502 Greeley,Colorado 80632 Cheyenne,Wyoming 82003
,J\ 7! (30]1 7763921 (303)351 0460 (307)632.9224
48(a,c Elf:" .^ n i
- -- Member of Consulting Engineers Council C
Rocky Mtn. Consultants
October 7, 1986
Page 2
Percolation rates ranging from ten ( 10) to four hundred and eighty (480)
minutes per inch were recorded on this site. It is our opinion that an
engineered evapotranspiration septic system will be required on Lot 1 Block 1
of this subdivision. We feel that areas large enough for supporting standard
septic systems can be located on the remaining lots with proper planning.
An additional two (2) lots in this subdivision can use evapotranspiration
captir cyctamc and thn cnhrlivicinn will still meat the County recy4atio a of
no more than twenty-five percent (25%) evapotranspiration systems for new
subdivisions. It is our opinion that the leachate from standard systems on
this site will basically flow downward to the bedrock before flowing laterally.
Due to the depth of the bedrock stratum on this site, we would not anticipate
seepage problems of the leachate from septic systems at the surface, providinc
no seepage beds are placed on slopes greater than eight percent (8%) . It
is suggested that industry with low water usage be planned for lots where
evapotranspiration systems are anticipated. -
Additional percolation tests will be required on each lot prior to construction
for the purpose of designing septic systems. Proper planning of building
and parking configurations to allow for locating leach fields in areas of
permeable soil will b_e_svantaaeQu5J.rom a slandpoint.-oLminimizinp cnctc
of septic systems, reducing the area required for leach fields and assuring
conformance with County regulations.
Enclosed please find our test boring location plan, log of borings, key to
borings and summary of percolation tests.
We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. Please contact
us if you have any questions regarding these results.
Very truly yours,
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
�tr�x.�xr:ra.
r• QgD J.
q4 '•
Edward J. Paas, P.E. cve 1 e`y. % s
Longmont Branch Manager 4 15776 =
Colorado Registration #15776 t j
j>.ye arUt T.— JS)
/pjk tE. -- p�P,te.
TEST BORING LOCATION PUN
SCALE I,= 3OO'
I I• 1
422 ,✓..24 AL.18
A
_.at pv N0.-17 - ---NO. 9 - - - Na 61 ---
/✓o 2/ A NO. I - 5 -.
.✓o.zs NaB O
NO.i0 NO.7 5
No.16
� � 1
N0.3
No15 — —
No.4
5 EXISTING
RESIDENCE AND '
OUT BUILDINGS
—0E6 P BORING
ANP PERC. TEST
NO la
N0.14
S
N0. I No. 0
No. 13
- - - - Cam: - a
Curt, P.O. " II EMPIRE LABORATORIES. INC.
.1 .
•
KEY TO BORING LOGS 11
/A,/ TOPSOIL Mg GRAVEL
BPS . .•.
SIONO Sal
FILL s..`e I SAND& GRAVEL
SILT SILTY SAND & GRAVEL
r J Ct PYFY SII T 0 s0 CODDLES
I' /I s
NCI SANDY SILT kla SAND,GRAVEL& COBBLES
J
CLAY simmi
WEATHERED BEDROCK
- - - SILTY CLAY -- SILTSTONE BEDROCK
SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK
d
SAND • • • SANDSTONE BEDROCK
'•• SILTY SAND
•/. ,. .M= LIMESTONE
CLAYEY SAND
GRANITE
SANDY SILTY CLAY ■ ,
1 * SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE
8 STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER
WATER TABLE 24 hours AFTER DRILLING
c HOLE CAVED
5/12 Indicates that 5 blows of a 140 pound hemmer felling 30 Inches was required to penetrate 12 Inches.
EMPIRE LABORATORIES.INC.
• . LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH NC. 1 No. 2 N0:2 Nat
0
/., /./ /.,,e /V/v ,v /y
/ j< 7../< /
/ f
/ si/
10
N0. 5 NO. G 0. 7
7.,..., —7./ /,
/6
2 ./ / 2. . ;
G / 50 7
fz �, j /z ' . . . /_7
/zi_
/D
n r•_....7_; ,
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
0 •
•
LOG OF BORINGS
DEPT H
No. g N0.9 NO.10 NO. I I
0 %, /,,, v,/II / V //✓_ /✓/i
I.
______./ /2/X
?/. /1. ? •
5 / /
//
4 ,
37/12,- 50/6 9— 4/12 /f 44/1b -
10
- - --- NO I2 NO. 13 NO. 14 NO. 15
0
/ • /
5 , • /
//
y ./
10/12 - ' :2/ 2 •
�- 7/12 =7/ 27/12 4" 50/8
10
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
•
�• LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH NU Ito NV. I i
.., rv.r
5
__._. _13/12,_-
10
EMPIRE LADORATORIES, INC.
1
LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH AA.ie A/o./9 No.20 /42/
0
I /2/
10 50/6 14. .
DEPTH .✓o.zL /.10.25 t✓a 24 ,'h.Z5
0 /1 / //)/
5
6/12 .• 50/11
10
EMPIRE LAbORATORIES, INC.
•
SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TESTS
Percolation Rate
Boring Number Location Minutes Per Inch
6/7/86 1 Lot 8 Block 2 40
2 Lot 7 Block 1 45
3 Lot 6 Block 2 480
4 Lot 4 Block 1 480
5 Int 4 Rlnrk 2 24Q
6 Lot 2 Block 2 60
7 Lot 2 Block 1 40
8/28/86 8 Lot 1 Block 1 240
9 Lot 3 Block 2 40
10 Lot 3 Block 1 52
11 Lot 5 Block 2 90
12 Lot 7 Block 2 45
13 Lot 8 Block 1 45
14 Lot 6 Block 1 45
_ *15 _ _. Lot 4 Block 1 20 __
'16 Lot 6 Block 2 10
*17 Lot 4 Block 2 40
10/6/86 *18 Lot 3 Block 1 24
*19 Lot 5 Block 2 24
*20 Lot 5 Block 2 24
*21 Lot 5 Block 2 Exploratory Hole
*22 Lot 4 Block 2 20
*23 Lot 4 Block 2 30
*24 Lot 4 Block 2 30
*25 Lot 3 Block 1 20
• *Retested in Different Area Within Lot.
• (i uJ (t11_�` 3Ol;(, •
1�111f of cOzo AO()
F Q�,e9a WE-87-0001
Hn ^ o.
RICHARD D.LAMM \'t ' ,.r * JOHN W. ROI
GOVERNOR * DIRECTOR
1876
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET
DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611
August 13, 1986
Gloria V. Dunn
Weld County Dept. of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Ms. Dunn:
RE: WILMAR SUBDIVISION
We have reviewed the geologic factors related to this proposed subdivision and
find the following:
1 . General soil conditions should be suitable for the intended purpose.
2. Soils are not suitable for standard septic leach fields. All
percolation rates are near or above the acceptable level . Engineered
systems may be used, but if the intended use is an industrial park
and if other than standard household wastes may be coming from these
industries, then we recommend a public system be required.
3. Drainage across the NW corner of Lot 1 , Block 2, needs to be
investigated.
4. The potential for mine subsidence has been addressed in the ATEC
Report #41-64012. We concur with their methods, results and
recommendations. It should be noted that on the boring location plan
that pillars 9 and 11 were not properly marked per the Explanation
and this should be corrected.
This site is suitable for the proposed use if a waste system is installed that
precludes the use of leach fields.
If you have any questions, please call .
Sincerely,
76../yr,C*->
L. R. Ladwig, Chief F� ! ,Ii[\J "
Minerals Fuels Section l 1i. , _._. .. ___ PI
bcr:LRL-87-014
3190/7 I4I
GEOLOGY
STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE Weld CO. Rum I;UINftlSSII
iiittie An .
IggeTo Planning Department Date August 15, 1986 rl
COLORADO From Wes Potter, Director, Health Protection Services JJL4 �17
6
subject:
S-X446:86:9
The site has clay base soils with a percolation rate of 40 to 480 minutes per
inch. Section 6. 1 C of the Weld County Individual Septic Disposal System
Regulations restricts the number of evapotranspiration systems in a new sub
division to no greater than 25%.
Therefore, due to the extensive size possibly required by industrial sewage
disposal systems and the restriction of a suitable soil this division does not
recommend for approval of this proposed sub division.
By Direction of Ralph R. Wooley, M.D. , Director, Weld County Health Department
r_ i
i 1-.J LG �� 1996
Weld co. 'ha iI i;nmmisstm'
• •
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: August 12, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N} NEI of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12, and west of Weld County Road 11
SIZE OF PARCEL: 80.479 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this application is listed in Section 5-4 of the
Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
1-3 (Industrial) zoning currently exists on the property. The applicants
wish to subdivide the site into 16 lots ranging in size from 2.4 acres to 20
acres. A portion of the site is located within a geologic hazard subsidence
zone.
The Department of Planning Services has not yet received referral responses
from the County Health Department and the Colorado Geological Survey.
Copies of recommendations from the Longmont Fire Protection District,
Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District, and County Engineering Department
are attached for your consideration.
The applicant has submitted correspondence addressed to Central Weld County
Water District and the Longmont Fire Protection District (dated August 5,
1986) and Left Hand Water Supply Company (dated August 6, 1986) in order to
demonstrate that progress is being made in obtaining an adequate water
supply to serve the site.
The Department of Planning Services has received one inquiry and no
objections from surrounding property owners regarding this proposal.
DEPAF�'�NT OF PLANNING SERVICE!
�C
LIM/ PHONE(303)3564000 EXT.44(
915 10th STREE
eic U. GREELEY,COLORADO 806:1:9aat
Rr 7F:.i b"
•
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on August
19, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a preliminary
plan for a Subdivision in the I-3 (Industrial) Zone District from Martin and
Wilma J. Oase on a parcel of land described as N} NE} of Section 11, TIN,
R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 80.479 acres, more
or less. The property is located approximately .75 mile west of Dacono,
south of Weld County Road 12, and west of Weld County Road 11.
The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the
consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld
County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related
to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley,
Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing
on August 19, 1986.
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the
Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center,
915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400.
Jack Holman, Chairman
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Johnstown Breeze
To be published one (1) time by July 31, 1986
•
Received by: Ong.A_
Date: 7/021/ 1-6
/
P7r,' ,c rD
i • .
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: S-262:86:7 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 22, 1986
NAME: Martin and Wilma Oase
REQUEST: Sketch Plan for a proposed 16 lot subdivision in an
Industrial—Three (I-3) Zone district
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni NE}, Section 11, T1N, R68W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
LAND USE: N Weld County Road 12, farmland, oil and gas facilities
E Weld County Road 11, industrial uses
S Farmground
W Salvage yard
ZONING: N Agricultural
E Industrial-Three
S Agricultural
W Agricultural
COMMENTS:
Accesses are to Weld County Roads 12 and 11, gravel-surfaced roads.
Existing businesses are as shown on the plat. Unoccupied land on the site
is irrigated pasture.
Four residences are within one-fourth mile of the property.
By: ViLwvi--
Gloria . Dunn
Curre Planner
c:", 1 ryrp
J .i`_ i --1,-----,t„-7.----. ,,, •_/ _ •^ _,--,-_-;,--75727
— /'174 .S 'S• u tl zr 2 I x •� 5E G .r Y� .�i a •ka n 7 xy.,:tiocirrt?
V Y
CC 'y f pit r 1t 4/ . ➢ :q•I „.fie:-"a..
•rg &it g p5T ' . ... \ I lei•-a--Wr CI (
_ P .° a Y ➢ .. :P ml . fqG .
.°�X• �4:• o I. .' O\° F: . ;L•r:xg f� = I • : �y ;
S 't1/4\...,„5N; .<\. '1° • :, '•• •T.
C:571 • •p r•
• - ° •noun• '• f•i is. \ . • , . i �. -et . \`•• G ` • ° v p •�-� •
• f.
4 �_ ` °•x G E I• ' pt•• a --,(51:11 •z ���k• •'Ill•'n r� a
[ n x
• •• � MEUC ••La
t • m , / Po 'H Y F C!• )1 •
_rte g� �: -- ! •=``t •
• .•• N ;, (;q... / ,• raj.,
, -k
r 3. 4111,• . x0 [.+i • p I�� 1 i . • x: .. r
m vxro '•`• • ••s a a. • \�a .ai• • °z !"�.. ..ns.i • ai ' :ft .
• 1 • .tl• ao ,5' it •�LFostr i•p •a 0••••
,'• G c :.0. • • �` -• ' • / J
� (\
n :Rtndan Y vfc s ' ➢ xs Viz+:,‘4C--' xv 27
G AL x• xf a ) i. z
Rurl • 1
• _q o o,,...�•-•••i• �a� p'�, e_ • L� At I
-
'' •b
• 1 , ��
y Cg'J » c• ;^NOS_L. snare '-Y1 �-i� f q. 'a/L » » a 1• • - >x »
FdeR_OUR y 0 1,
R tr• •Z f• •rt.%i TTrHT721'
/Cwt
a sr 1• x gIL11 \° l a !
—hi• • r ft ! r- '1414% • •'•• a i-••
T2N. �— • • r.. -- -�-•• ei o ipso x:; x S xa . I'a ._ xx »\\• ii F
9° ,t5,'/ •G "•• ii _ , 1 �• A".l •a. L a
• E...1.:`,41 + . Ree .`mil,
[ 1i� :'• 1 sr » /// • 2 • _•• L �. '� `'fix+• i
• tat.iennzi.•
,..•,-., �x `•N F, 1 i 4 \
f v�. d ri `5/ f. a'I, L;1 : '
p l� isaoU ofa, �..e �;F.�➢\ t ,: L -.__� ,L i C`T -r_`—
,ii•: .•o• J 1 L .'\L• ..{ . .� L>CON -i • • .G•, .I
M / i •ar -r042 WPiON
0• a l i• L ! 6��r&9<.xiy��y� c� `; .J �/ : _S�:a / '` 4 .ws a
ix y: a •
_ )fir ( g� a .'$ ' .� ' c.4_ :;*14-1,/::7,",/ ��•
W _• l//`� i /� L' � $ACRE5 '0"`• • •.i•/'!4�, i \ J/ ,ti;', � ; .i
n.,+ grail 'F •It`ll k. L ((E.:IT:L.'.
, °: .. .,; . t�
O 't- �- »_ •.. la—
II• t
J .xa� x lly, f o / •.
TIN i• ' r , l
/C '� Y i Irp.: _ �a 't[ L /� ••.• G ,L r—� h • 'i �{ . L.
0 •$•r 0v"
_217:1_11,.-
y/ xf xx » 11'' 42 i c z0 •:• x• [ x •.t n x f- io/ x I
I. G i 5 h• ,.one, it1'1[1
4 . / L• .k..: �:.. . . L [ 1 :1 war rr,eEG6 ` • L ;�; ��
� a
O �. •�; - 1 ; [ ✓ L er.. . •i • ay'. - i., i •, :JAL Q r
/ . i : ii ..
•P' c Y -- G 1/�L1 L° / �• \ �• • °• }
f{Ef A Jr . a ,i• L s0 ➢P$/ L ,ten i 1 x V •.-4,"4- �I 1( n v 14..y
Co flit'• •t ..-..ter F i zo.r. ..li s ' !Il f o\• !, ••< •��_
s y ,L•� "= ,•, i , ' I j' �2 'i
1. L .Y �/ •L G Y L rk•I •• •II 1f L a. 4 2ti » \ L » LE a• g L 1a�3 •p, 2
,, Y •:' RGB•t/ \,/(_ L 1 ' L 4 . 67.1• •
I R...
4 0 A . M . S
i
2 \� ' • _'_v a Mn .nii
-
� r
e
` Oi
V
\V r l ✓� . / - I
a • I _ter, a iijs. .___ e /
r * _
. ---__ - •,. 1
s �:5: \ , � _ N
/1,_--1 el9l ; 'r Well
1 I' �� r SO V - // /. I 4i00 = 5/00
) n om / i' „c, � '
� I, r 12 0„c, r
r / _ pl / I , A I�'.- 5 j
\I --5717.9 --'- -' j-=--7•°
,\ - ------ -----',C.‘ N .,--,. \ K.
/ �� I -k of Pine
asz, 050 j
14 � — -
113 •1 __/5r00� 1__
_ t lg
y // - J
IT J 1 L
CTC[k « `; Sun
5/45
J 50
-115 =-- i<� -
a - I ^, T11t ^ I_ _�__.�T_ - 560'1
/
if
Lin olr Arne —
:
�` _ - - aJ\'rails r n J ..
Y / / 1���., j ,� _- r
Ilic
).r f
• r r .�.r s.:J r t�'.lv..Nv, r`.:.; .,C 1 \e:v ♦ :6.
ii
NEL, CIO. , Ft. 12
7\\\\\E S
4
insitcw, O5.3
CC?9
03/48
O25
'I
H
Cam)
1
S
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: Martin and Wilma J. Oase CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: August 11, 1986
NO SR NR NO SR NR
X Weld County Health Dept.
X Engineering Department
X Tri Area Planning Commission
c/o Rebecca Marker
P.O. Box 363
/ Frederick, CO 80530
Y X Louis J. Rademacher
Weld County Planning Commission
13184 Weld Calvary Road 13
/ Longmont, CO 80501
1/ X Longmont Soil Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road
Box D
Longmont, CO 80501
v X Longmont Fire Protection District
c/o Captain Wm. Emerson
9119 County Line Road
Longmont, CO 80501
te/ X Weld County Sheriff's Department
c/o Rick Dill
X Colorado Geological Survey
c/o Lou Ladwig
1313 Sherman Street
Room 715
Denver, CO 80203
NO=No Objection
SR=Specific Recommendations
NR=No Response
• •
Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road, Box D Longmont,Colorado 80501
August 1, 1986
Ms. Gloria V. Dunn, Current Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case Number S-264:86:9 - Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Dear Gloria:
The Oase proposed subdivision development is on Kim loam 1-3%, Kim
loam 5-9%, Nunn clay loam 1-3%, and Ulm clay loam 3-5% slopes. The
Kim loam 1-3% slopes and the Nunn clay loam are prime farmland. These
two soil types make up approximately 75% of the land development area.
There is no erosion control plan for dust control during and after
construction. Wetting busy roads will help keep dust to a minimum
during construction and permanent grass seedings along borrow pits of
roads will eliminate excessive erosion after housing is completed.
There are some construction limitations which will need special attention
during construction. The Nunn clay loam has a moderate to high shrink-
swell potential which may cause foundation cracks. The Ulm clay loam
and the Nunn clay loam contain a lot of clay which may cause problems
with basement construction. Also these two soil types have a slow permeability
rate which will need attention if septic tank absorption fields are to
be used for sewage disposals.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this land development proposal.
If we can be of any further assistance, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Barry L. Sinkey
President
BLS:rah
o Iraq, 1, v
r,(.1b o,) 1980
Weld Co. Planning ilumimssi
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 1,,.,,-s e �.zj
•z a.. .fkaa� S +Lznr . '' s" : +L' S
LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
^
'`� �' 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
a°rt�T�o s`/ David Rierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Molubec,Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Num
Fire Chiel Director Director Director Director Director
June 30, 1986
Ms. Susan Ruptash, Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
500 Coffman Street , Suite 107
Longmont , CO 80501
' Dear Ms. Ruptash,
This letter will document our recent meeting regarding
the Wilmar (Oase) Subdivision. As we discussed, the April
11 , 1986 left-7—to you from Central Weld County Water
District (CWCWD) leads us to believe that a firm comrnittment
to upgrade the existing water system is not likely in the
near future.
Therefore, we require an on site water supply of not
less than 300 , 000 gallons of water for fire protection. This
supply source could be an elevated metal storage tank ,
gravity flow type or a ground level tank or an embankment
supported, rubberized, fabric suction storage tank . All
require automatic fire pumps , valves, etc. The water supply
could still come from CWCWD. The water level in the tank
must be maintained automatically with pipe size to fill the
tank within eight hours.
In addition, the covenants of the development shall
require:
I . Property owners to contact the fire district prior
to any plans for development being submitted to Weld
County Planning Department ,
2. All proposed changes in occupancy to a structure to
be coordinated with the fire district ,
3 . Structures to be protected by automatic sprinkler
systems and standpipe systems ,
4. Restrictions of occupancy to ordinary hazard and
below,
5. Building height to be limited to 35 feet or three
stories ,
6. Building construction types be limited to type
1-FR, type II-FR, II one hour , and type I11 -one hour ,
7 . Floor area limitations to the requirements of the 1985
Uniform Building Code Table 5-C.
Some of these restrictions are based upon the type of
occupancy presently anticipated and could vary depending on
individual occupancies in the development . Feel free to r t �,��
contact us again whenever you have comments or questions . Ql r6lEii��\ 11Ir Sincerely, t!! 991986
7€2444:4fligerfriVftld Co. Planning Cammi
William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal , LFPD
i Mx'e.'M�� F .s<.'- .. �`�.. - . . • �v1.v;Ws7t+.f1'f��;`3^i't*�',�d� �A�lr".4�"�`�*73`:�',ae.. �.1+-ii'i i .,i._.:T,...�.,.`Y�C,"°nTF.?teu�K�i'r�.aT;
•
`` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE;
PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 440
915 10th STREE
GREELEY,COLORADO 8063
iruk •
M1 '
•
COLORADO CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 221, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within fourteen (14) days (but wish to
do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation.
1. xx We have reviewed this request and find that the request
does (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons. Well planned usage of land and
within guidelines of County ordinance and our compre-
hensive plan .
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons:
•
3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
4. Please refer o the enclosed letter.
Signed Agency: Tri -Area Planning Commission
Secretary -
Date: Au ust 6 , 1986
Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter.
Glor a . Dunn HiJ G 07 1986
Curr n Planner
Weld Co. Planning Commission
F l t - \?i S k. &
{ • DEPAIIIIIENT OF PLANNING SERVIC
r m ( PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.
�/'� 915 10th STR
�t t GREELEY,COLORADO 61
tIti
4 ; .4 ,y
Sd '+ €�.
It f}• �y
COLORADO
CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the Ni NEI of Secticn
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
1. )( We have reviewed the proposaland -find no conflicts with our
interests.'
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
mitted prior to
3. Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: ; j � i f g Y /v n D (�
)21
�;, p,. ,,parrAenc : // n /, ��J �� ,
JUL 311980
Via- V •
Gloria V. Dunn Weld Co. Planning iumm)sswa
curet: Planner 1L (g I fnEre U! {M r r %ma I i;vipQC l /}y‘4-1 c, p.)Uci wU-V k
S - -VI 15,1C etc l u4...te
vM E-e. a.,c0. ao CI.CSGrr.6a4CI evin , n 1
.
vic/// tom i , ErnoRAn IF 7. M
l
Gloria V. Dunn
Imp C To Current Planner
Date July 25, 1986
COLORADO From Donald R. Carroll , Administrative Manager - Engineering Dept.
Martin and Wilma J. Oase for subdivision - S-264_86:9
subject:
We have reviewed the preliminary plan and have no problems .
In the final plat we would like the following items addressed:
1. The internal road cross section - is it going to be paved,
gravel with shoulders, or borrow pit ditches with culverts
at all accesses.
2. Applicant needs to address the access roads - upgrades
leading to the property for upgrading and dust control
with a road maintenance agreement.
3. Culvert size 15" C.M.P. Min. at all accesses.
4. Water line out of roadway. Relocate to borrow pit or shoulder
area. Taps to each lot.
5. Paving is required for public street.
6. A "Master Drainage Plan" that addresses retention will be
required. Subsequent site plans that handle drainage in
accordance with the "Master Plan" will be required for
individual lots.
DRC/bf
`off N(ra J"Vv7
J.'
J7,. 2, 19E3
U CS-,
Weld Cu. Planning Cumnusriou
ter:' 17",
�.,:.�\1/.5-.x: .,
(.....et ‘1: 1 i .
DEPAI•dIENT OF PLANNING SERVIC
7 � PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.
IR
915 10th STR
l GREELEY,COLORADO 81
wI 0 `!Yq
gr. tg
COLORADO
CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986 v repl->
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision -
preliminary plan, The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter. ,
1. We have reviewed the proposal and -find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted prior to
3. Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: ' )Vd-e , 1 L'' 1 Agency: Date: q' A 5 8c-'
cc4.0_,....2-4 V:AL---•-----
Gloria V. Dunn
Current Planner
•
• •
Rocky Mountain Consultants,Inc.
? Fes.
500 Coffman Street. Suite 107•Longmont,CO 80501 •(303) 772-5282 ; y
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line 665-6283
August 5, 1986
Mr. Dale D. Olhausen
Central Weld County Water District
2235 2nd Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80637
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Mr. Olhausen:
Thank you for meeting with us yesterday concerning the Wilmar Subdivision.
We wish to request your standard letter of commitment to serve. We would appre-
ciate receipt of same prior to the August 14, 1986 Weld County Utility meeting.
We would like to pursue your suggestion of a two phase program of improvements
to the system. Phase I would involve the installation of a pressure regulating
valve and flow meter at existing connection between CWCWD and Left Hand Water
Supply Company at I-25. This would be regarded as a temporary measure. When a
set number of lots have been developed (5 to 6), or within a limited time period
(two years) , the developers would be required to participate in the funding of a
looped 6" main or renegotiate the District' s commitment to serve. Alternate
approaches may become feasible should other development occur nearby. The
developer' s participation would be in the form of modified up-front Capital
Improvement Fees rather than actual construction costs associated with the
improvements. Engineering, design, construction and coordination of the
improvements would be the District' s responsibility. We would appreciate your
suggestions at this time regarding the contents of an agreement between CWCWD
and the developers so that we may verify the Fire District' s support of the
project. We have made initial contact with Left Hand Water Supply Company
regarding the Phase I connection.
We wish to clarify the number of taps likely to occur. Lot 1 , Block 1 (20 acre
parcel ) has an existing tap that is adequate for their projected future needs.
o (� Shy
1 IJ G 0: 1986
Yield Co. Planning Commission
•
Page 2
Mr. Dale D. Olhausen
Lot 8, Block 2 is currently (and proposed to remain) a storage yard and will not
likely ever require water service.
Thank you for your continued efforts to resolve these issues.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
cc: Martin and Wilma Oase
Captain William Emerson, Longmont Fire Protection District
Terry Magnusen, Left Hand Water Supply Company
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107•Longmont, CO 80501•(303) 772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line 665-6283 _ g..,
August 5, 1986
Captain William Emerson
Longmont Fire Protection District
9119 County Line Road
Longmont, Colorado 80501
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Captain Emerson:
We met with Central Weld County Water District on August 4, 1986 and they have
suggested the following course of action.
PHASE I: Construct pressure regulating valve and meter at existing connection
of the CWCWD 6" main to Left Hand Water Supply Company to allow water to automa-
tically flow to subject property upon pressure drop. This is considered a tem-
porary measure until approximately 6 lots are developed.
PHASE II : Construction of a new (6" diameter minimum) main as shown on attached
sketch to offer looped service to the site.
CWCWD is currently preparing draft agreements outlining these improvements. We
will forward same to you upon receipt for your comments.
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely, -
RROOICKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
7�1'r
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
Enclosure Ft(WA\-_P-ir
�I IJ G 07 1986
/- -
Weld Co. Planning cumnussim,
Rocky Mountain Consultants,Inc.
� s-14 t
s
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107•Longmont,CO 80501•(303) 772-5282
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO•Denver line 665-6283n
It. F..
August 6, 1986
Ms. Terry Magnuson
Left Hand Water Supply Company
P.O. Box 210
Niwot, Colorado 80544
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Terry:
This letter follows your telephone conversation with John Cummings of our office
regarding the Wilmar Subdivision near Dacono.
PROJECT HISTORY
PROJECT: Wilmar Subdivision, 80 acres, 16 lot industrial subdivision.
OWNERS: Martin and Wilma Oase.
LOCATION: Ni, NE#, S11 , T1N, R68W, Weld County, Colorado.
STATUS: Planning Commission to review Preliminary Plat on August 19,
1986. Anticipated final approval September 1986.
WATER SUPPLY: Central Weld County Water District: -
CWCWD does not currently have good supply to the site. Future plans include
installation of a looped main to improve service. Due to the high immediate
costs of the improvements, we are seeking a temporary interim solution to allow
some lots to be developed prior to the main installation.
We have met with Mr. Dale Olhausen of CWCWD and he has suggested installing a
temporary pressure regulating valve and meter at the existing connection between
CWCWD' s 6" main along the north edge of Section 11 and LHWSC' s 6" • .t—E.2-5-
The valve would automatically open upon loss of pressure in CWCWD' 0 :fI�aC V E
provide water ( i .e. , in case of fire demands). This temporary mea ' •
AUG 07 1986
Weld Co. Planning Cummissio
• •
,
Page 2
Ms. Terry Magnuson
in effect for approximately two years, or until six (6) lots were developed.
The developer would bear the cost of installing the PRV and meter.
We have enclosed background letters and maps for your information. Please feel
free to call myself or Dale Olhausen if you should need any further information.
We would appreciate any help you can offer in expediting this matter. We are
hoping to have a preliminary response from you prior to our August 14, 1986
Utility Meeting with Weld County. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
S.M. Ruptash
SMR/cvr
cc: Mr. Dale Olhausen, CWCWD
Enclosures
4-5116
4
MAILING LIST
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Case
Richard Cosslett, Etal
c/o Longmont National Bank
5th and Coffman
Longmont, CO 80501
Roy H. and Beverly Carlson
11176 Pearl Street
Northglenn, CO 80233
Cheryl Marie Leppla
c/o Raleigh & Leppla
3045 California Avenue Sw.
Seattle, WA 98116
Edward and Okla Eckert
c/o Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
Maybelle M. , Mary Irene, & Annie Wright
Box 94
Erie, CO 80516
Clifford R. and Vera L. Haller
4651 Road 11
Erie, CO 80516
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran
4394 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
William N. and Ann M. Stonebraker
5401 North Federal Boulevard
Denver, CO 80221
Azalea Farms
1005 Riverside Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dan E. Ryaq
8115 West 63 Avenue
Arvada, CO 80004
• PRELIMINAAY PLAN •
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Department of Planning Services, 915 - 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado
PHONE: 356-4000 Ext . 404
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:
,CASE NO. APPL. FEE
ZONING DISTRICT RECORDING FEE
DATE _ RECEIPT NO.
APPL. CHECKED BY
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required
signatures) :
I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County
Planning Commission concerning proposed subdivision of the following
described unincorporated area of Weld County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION :
The N% of the NE1 of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. ,
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the Community Consolidated Canal
and Reservoir Company by Deed recorded July 29, 1908 in Book 283 at Page 140,
Weld County Records.
If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet of this same
>ize. )
TAME OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION _ Wilmar Subdivision
XISTING ZONING 1-3 PROPOSED ZONING I-3
'OTAL AREA (ACRES) 80.479 NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS 16
40T SIZE: AVERAGE 4. 6 acres MINIMUM 2.3 acres
[TILITIES: WATER: NAME Central Weld County Water
SEWER: NAME Individual Septic Systems
GAS: NAME Rocky Mountain Gas
PHONE: NAME Mountain Bell
)ISTRICTS : SCHOOL: NAME Nnt Apolicable
FIRE: NAME Longmont Rural Fire District
ESIGNERS ' NAME Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
DDRESS 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 Longmont, CO 80501 PHONE 772-5282
NGINEERS ' NAME Same
DDRESS PHONE
EE OWNER OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SUBDIVISION
AME Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase
DDRESS 4724 Weld County Road 12, Erie, CO 80516
AME PHONE 654-0867
DDRESS PHONE
AME
DURESS PHONE
hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements,
roposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this aonlication
re true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
RUNTY OF WELD )
TATE OF COLORADO) p
Sign ture �/: Owner or Authorized Agent
abscribed and sworn to before me this day of -v19g.6P 19 �
ic„.,_
SEAL
A�IC " ti�`T
commission expires: 5/c/st
f rA
)4-79-028
f' ;; ` __/�.a..,
WCDPS-78-1
•
WILMAR SUBDIVISION
Ni, NEI, Section 11 , Township 1 North, R68W, 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
SUMMARY STATEMENT
( 1 ) Total Development Area = 80.479 acres
(2) Total Number of Proposed Dwelling Units = 1
(3) Total Non-residential Floor Space Floor Area Ratio = 1 to 1
(4) Total Number of Off Street Parking Spaces = 1 per 500 S.F.
(5) Water Requirements = 20,000 GPD
(6) Sewage Treatment: Individual Septic Systems
( 7) Estimated Construction Costs:
Streets: $185,000
Water Distribution: 42,500
Storm Drainage Facilities: 3,500
Utilities: 95,000
Financing Method: Owner Financing
(8) Special Districts: Central Weld County Water District
Longmont Fire Protection District
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
St. Vrain and Left Hand Water Conservancy District
i •
UTILITY SERVICE STATEMENT FOR SUBDIVISIONS
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The following record of utilities shall be processed by the subdivider or his
representative as required in Section 5-2D. of the Weld County Subdivision
Regulations.
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER OR DEVELOPER Partin Oase and Wilma Oase
Name of Subdivision WILMAR SUBDIVISION
Agent/owner Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc
Name & Address 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107, Longmont, C4 80501
ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY : Union REA
Approved by �y . /pp -1_ix��/ ' ,^C., ;�/r,vs<.
(Name) f` ',cf+.. ..�,<v� ‘1{.
(Title) (Date)
Subject to -
n J �f..�;, �.n oc/ ,/fri ir. C� 1
Disapproved by
(Name) (T. c)- (Date)
dATLR : Cen d Co ty ter en Approved bYPALfs Leg fraerr _ LILGT/fjQ5—/`YANA-%rG"k' V//e9C
(Name) (Title) /
(Date)
Subject to X66TINir /¢ GL /'C"pte [ti'Eh 71(71 AM, ei/44&cS 0et G-)/S
Disapproved by _
(Name) (Title) (Date)
SEWER : Not Applicable
Approved by On site septic systems
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
TELEPHONE COMPANY : Mountain Bell
Approved by 'Q.(., NQ1xd— `lCiuC.2-
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
GAS COMPANY : Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Approved by 9 //� �)
(Name) -•-• l.�,,_.cJ /1��-h-' � . ��r�
Title) Date
Subject to �v . _�' � �� "ere,
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
FIRE DISTRICT : Longmont Fire Protection District
Approved by . a /C//I F iys gncNA L 7 -6- SC
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
Subject to 06-44A .QJ..,� ,4
Disapproved by Lai
(Name) (Title) (Date)
I
UTTY SERVICE STATEMENT rOR SUBDIV75IONS
PRELIMINARY FLAT
The following record of utilities shall be processed by the subdivider or his
representative as required in Section 5-2D. of the Weld County Subdivision
Regulations,
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER OR DEVELOPER Martin Oase and Wilma Oase
Name of Subdivision WILMAR SUBDIVISION
Agent/ownerRocky Mountain Consultants, Inc
Name & Address 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107, Longmont, CO 80501
ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY : Union REA
Approved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
WATER : Central Weld County Water District
Approved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
SEWER : Not Applicable
Approved by On site septic systems
(Name) (Title) (Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
TELEPHONE COMPANY : nt n Bell
Approved by
(Title) (Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
GAS COMPANY : Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Approved by
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
FIRE DISTRICT : Longmont Fire Protection District
Approved by
(Name) (Title)
(Date)
Subject to
Disapproved by
(Name) (Title) (Date)
• • RECEIVED JUL
���IOMpMr \
�4� ��� LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
��i
Vitige 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
.cnoM David Bierwrler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec,Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Russ
Fire Chief Director Director Director Director Director
June 30 , 1986
Ms . Susan Ruptash, Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants . Inc .
500 Coffman Street , Suite 107
Longmont , CO 80501
Dear Ms. Ruptash,
This letter will document our recent meeting regarding
the Wilmar (Oase) Subdivision. As we discussed, the April
11 , 1986 letter to you from Central Weld County Water
District (CWCWD) leads us to believe that a firm committment
to upgrade the existing water system is not likely in the
near future.
Therefore, we require an on site water supply of not
less than 300 , 000 gallons of water for fire protection. This
supply source could be an elevated metal storage tank ,
gravity flow type or a ground level tank or an embankment
supported, rubberized, fabric suction storage tank. All
require automatic fire pumps , valves, etc. The water supply
could still come from CWCWD. The water level in the tank
must be maintained automatically with pipe size to fill the
tank within eight hours .
In addition, the covenants of the development shall
require:
1 . Property owners to contact the fire district prior
to any plans for development being submitted to Weld
County Planning Department ,
2 . All proposed changes in occupancy to a structure to
be coordinated with the fire district ,
3 . Structures to be protected by automatic sprinkler
systems and standpipe systems ,
4. Restrictions of occupancy to ordinary hazard and
below,
5. Building height to be limited to 35 feet or three
stories ,
6. Building construction types be limited to type
1 -FR, type II -FR, II one hour, and type III -one hour ,
7. Floor area limitations to the requirements of the 1985
Uniform Building Code Table 5-C.
Some of these restrictions are based upon the type of
occupancy presently anticipated and could vary depending on
individual occupancies in the development . Feel free to
contact us again whenever you have comments or questions .
Si/ncerely
,
S�
William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal , LFPD r./ 17r n
- )l P1AUI LIAI lii h u h JUU L1
(Please Print Or Type} -
' SUBJECT PROPERTY: Martin and Wilma Oase (N2Ne4 11-1-63)
NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY , ASSESSOR 'S PARCEL
STATE AND LIP CODE IDENTIFICATION NO.
Richard Cosslettz_etal,_c/o Lonpcmont Nat' l Bank, 5th and Coffman,
Longmont, CO 80501 146701000009
Roy H. and Carlson, 11176 Pearl St., Northglenn, CO 30233 146702000005
Cheryl Marie Leppla, c/o Raleigh & Lepplat_3045 California Av. Sw.
Seattle, WA 98116 146702000007
Edward and Okla Eckert, c/o Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran,
4394 WCR 12, Erie, CO 80516 146711000002
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran, 4394 WCR 12, Erie, CO 30516 146711000003
Maybelle M. , Mary Irene, and Annie Jane Wright, Box 94, Erie, CO 80516 146711000004
Clifford R. and Vera L. Haller, 4651 Rd. 11 , Erie, CO 80516 146711000026
Roland K. and Mary E. Cochran, 4394 WCR 12, Erie, CO 80516 146711000033
William N. and Ann M. Stonebraker, b401 N. Federal Blvd. , Denver, CO
80221 146712200029
William N. and Ann M. Stonebraker, 5401 N. Federal Blvd. , Denver, CO
80221 146712200049
Azalea Farms , 1005 Riverside Dr. , Fort Collins , CO 80521 146712200053
Dan E. Ryan, x115 W. 63rd Av. , Arvada , CO _ 80004 146712200054
.__ice
EW
Weld Co. Planrmg Commission
•
aWe
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
April 11 , 1986
Sue M. Ruptash
Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
500 Coffman Street , Suite 107
Longmont , CO 80501
REr Oase Subdivision
Dear Ms. Ruptashr
I received your April 4 , 1986, communication For the Oase
Subdivision. Service to this particular location is somewhat
limited at this time from existing District facilities. Although
there is a 6" watermain in the County Road, the Central Weld
District does not have good supply capacity to this area. The
District has a booster pump station to pressurize and serve this
area. The District is considering extending another main to the
area to interconnect with the 6" to supply additional capacity
requirements .
For this vicinity the District has required developers requiring
service to install required facilities and contribute for an
off-site main or oversizing which may be required in the future to
serve the properties. Enclosed are copies of our rate schedules
and tap fees, which will apply. To evaluate your needs, we
request that you send an Administrative and Study Fee in the
amount of $200. 00 based on the 16 lots proposed. Upon receipt of
funds, we will further evaluate service to serve your development
and advise you. We would appreciate information on anticipated
demand requirements within the subdivision. If you have further
questions regarding this communication, please so advise .
Very truly yours,
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
c(92p-P, C
Dale D. Olhausen
Secretary-Manager
ODO/caa
Enclosures
?:S-'." Inn,
2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley,Colorado 80631 • (303)352.1294 • Dale D. Olhausen,Secretary-Manager
Empire Laboratories, Inc. P.O.Box 503 • (303)484-0359
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING&MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes • Fort Collins,Colorado 80522
June 13, 1986
Rocky Mountain Consultants
500 Coffman
Longmont, CO 80501
Attn: Mrs. Sue Ruptash
Re: Wilmar Subdivision
Weld County, CO
Gentlemen:
Our firm has performed preliminary percolation tests on seven (7) lots
at the above referenced project. Seven (7) exploratory holes were
drilled to a depth -of approximately eight (8) to nine (9) feet and seven
(7) percolation test holes, six (6) inches in diameter, were drilled to
a depth of approximately two and one-half (24) feet on June 6, 1986.
Percolation tests were then performed in the field after a twenty four
(24) hour soak period. The purpose of this investigation was to determine
the suitability of this proposed subdivision for individual septic systems.
It is our understanding that this will be an industrial subdivision.
This subdivision is designed to contain a total of sixteen (16) lots.
We understand that two (2) of these lots already contain septic systems.
The soil conditions at this site consisted basically of approximately
(6) inches of clayey topsoil overlying sandy silty clay with occasional
layers of silty sand below a depth of six (6) feet. Claystone or sand-
stone bedrock was encountered in borings 3, 6 and 7 at depths of seven
and one half (74) to eight (8) feet below the ground surface. No sub-
surface groundwater was encountered at the time of our investigation to
depth of eight (8) feet. However, water levels could flucuate on this
site due to seasonal variations and irrigation demands. Please refer to
the enclosed boring logs for a more accurate description of the soils
conditions. Percolation rates on this site varied from forty (40) to
four hundred eighty (480) minutes per inch.
Based on the high percolation rates recorded in three (3) of the percolat-
ion tests, it is our opinion that evapotranspiration septic systems will
be required on some of the lots in this subdivision. The high percolat-
ion rates were recorded in a high area of the site in the southwest 1/4
of the area investigated.
`oboe%%O
ft
% Branch Offices
4e t'
P.O.Box 1136 P.O.Box 1744 P.O.Box 1007E
Longmont,Colorado 80602 Greeley,Colorado 80832 Cheyenne,Wyoming 820(
,r, .7 (303)776-3921 (303)351-0480 (307)632-9224
Member of Consulting Engineers Council kk
Enclosed please find our test boring location plan, log of borings,
key to borings and sunary of percolation tests.
We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. Please
contact us if you have any questions regarding these results.
Very truly yours,
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
S T E?CO;`P
\Q21 71- 't `. traf-
E -a 15776 a-
Edward J. Paas, P.E. = ="' ` ti
Longmong Branch Manager rte. rcAc �',�
sio
Colorado Registration #15776 `'ire CF
/sdf
• •!
SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TESTS
Boring No. Percolation Rate
Min/In
I 40
2 45
3 480
4 480
5 240
6 60
7 40
• KEY TO BORING LOGS •
liie TOPSOIL IN GRAVEL
Pre
Oa FILL [1:../ SAND& GRAVEL
I,e SILT •i• SILTY SAND& GRAVEL
/ / /!4
r.1 CLAYEY SILT o COBBLES
,1el
i•ei' SANDY SILT
e 'e. SAND,GRAVEL&COBBLES
•
CLAY lis WEATHERED BEDROCK
IIIIIl
SILTY CLAY __ SILTSTONE BEDROCK
/I
isa SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK
SAND • • • SANDSTONE BEDROCK
• SAND
SILTY n LIMESTONE
IMS
P CLAYEY SAND x:K GRANITE
Snit
SANDY SILTY CLAY ■
' SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE
8 STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER
C7 WATER TABLE 24 Hrs. AFTER DRILLING
C HOLE CAVED
T
5/12 Indicates that 5 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches was required to penetrate 12 inches.
('lr-. 27
EMPIRE LABORATORIES,INC.
• •
LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH NO. I NO. 2 NO. 3 N09-
O
/✓ .✓ /✓/✓ /✓/V /✓ /,'
/ i. . :
5 7 . 7 /V
/ / /
742 ,. . 1 442 /
442
it
/O
NO. 5' NO. G N0. 7
O 7,//./ 7✓/ :✓/.
. / / '
/ . .
/: -
642 II' I
"Via I—-
/0 1
r' ,.M- 9 7
EMPIRE USORATORIES, INC.
TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN
PJ
SCALE I'= 3oo'
I I
I
I I
No..5" No.6
S 9
O
No.7
I
C
NO.3 _s
S N
No.4
EXISTING
RESIDENCE AND I
OUT BUILDINGS
—DEEP BORING
AND PERC. TEST
NO. I NO.2
S 9
chi"?' RD. *I
EMPIRE LABORATORIES. INC.
• • FZEGU.IVtL) J U L /
l� LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
tletrtoN a David Bierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec.Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Nuss
Fire Chief Director Director Director Director Director
June 30 , 1986
Ms . Susan Ruptash, Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107
Longmont , CO 80501
Dear Ms. Ruptash,
This letter will document our recent meeting regarding
the Wilmar (Oase) Subdivision. As we discussed, the April
11 , 1986 letter to you from Central Weld County Water
District (CWCWD) leads us to believe that a firm committment
to upgrade the existing water system is not likely in the
near future.
Therefore, we require an on site water supply of not
less than 300,000 gallons of water for fire protection. This
supply source could be an elevated metal storage tank,
gravity flow type or a ground level tank or an embankment
supported, rubberized, fabric suction storage tank. Ali
require automatic fire pumps, valves, etc. The water supply
could still come from CWCWD. The water level in the tank
must be maintained automatically with pipe size to fill the
tank within eight hours.
In addition, the covenants of the development shall
require:
1 . Property owners to contact the fire district prior
to any plans for development being submitted to Weld
County Planning Department ,
2. All proposed changes in occupancy to a structure to
be coordinated with the fire district ,
3 . Structures to be protected by automatic sprinkler
systems and standpipe systems ,
4. Restrictions of occupancy to ordinary hazard and
below,
5 . Building height to be limited to 35 feet or three
stories,
6. Building construction types be limited to type
I-FR, type II-FR, II one hour, and type III-one hour,
7. Floor area limitations to the requirements of the 1985
Uniform Building Code Table 5-C.
Some of these restrictions are based upon the type of
occupancy presently anticipated and could vary depending on
individual occupancies in the development . Feel free to
contact us again whenever you have comments or questions .
Sincerely,
William R. Emerson „.,7 s ern
Fire Marshal , LEPO Y' -
7‘FICLA-1/4)Th
''' LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
-111 �1 ;� Mi
"wa_� :e/ 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
\eonoNi
25 April 1986
Ms. Debbie deBesche
Weld County Department
of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
RE: Case Number S-262:86:7 — OASE Subdivision
Dear Ms. deBesche
We have reviewed the Application and Sketch Plan for the proposed OASE Subdivision
and do not have any conflicts; providing the Applicant will document provisions to
provide an adequate fire protection water supply and all weather roadways for emergency
access prior to any building construction, as required in the Uniform Fire Code-1982
Edition and N.F.P.A. Standard 1141-1985 Edition.
Copies of the Uniform Fire Code-1982 Edition and N.F.P.A. Standard 1141 "Fire
Protection in Planned Building Groups " 1985 Edition are available at Longmont Fire
Protection District - Central Station at 9119 County Line Road for review or loan.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely, /� {�
7 c o C
William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal
WRE/wre
Copies: Mr. & Mrs. Oase
Ms. Jennifer Rodriguez - Rocky Mountain Consultants y--;� y
Board of Directors (5) Q P` ILr�J 2ryi, I /�r
Secretary/Attorney (y
District Chief APR 28 1986
File (3)
Weld Co. Mont Comaiscim
fri)p—"ft n H i m I p 'cm
ROCRY
\\( )( \ \IA
j \ pit I. \I �s
June 6, 1986
Weld County Planning Commission:
As the natural gas utility in the area of the Wilmar
Sub-division at Weld County Roads 11 and 12, I would like to
affirm that natural gas will be available to this area. I
have reviewed the plans and easements and found them to be
adequate for our needs.
• • ict
Mountain Bell
Greeley, Colorado
June 25, 1986
Weld County Planning Commission
To Whom it may concern:
This letter is to inform you that Mountain Bell has telephone
facilities available for Wilmar Subdivision, also all Utility
easements shown are adequate for our use.
Very truly y rs,
/91/eY
Joe Layton
ES/DSDC
SJL/djh
PC on
• i
UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION. INC.
P.O. Box 929 Route 7
Brighton, Colorado 80601 Box 601
o G. (303) 659-0551 Golden, Colorado 80403
(303) 642-7921
June 6, 1986
Weld County Planning Commission
Court House
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Dear Sir:
The Wilmar Subdivision located in the NE i of Section 11,
Township 1 North, Range 68 West, is within the service
territory of Union Rural Electric Association, Inc.
Union Rural Electric is capable of providing the electrical
facilities to serve this subdivision in accordance with
our Rules and Regulations and Line Extension Policies on
file at Corporate Headquarters, 18551 E. 160th Ave. , Brighton,
Colorado.
If you need further assistance please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Union Rural Electric Association, Inc.
Dorthy Ruggles
Supervisor
Engineering Support Services
"A Consumer-Owned Utility Serving Five Front Range Colorado Counties"
SSIDENCE POTENTIAL, GRADEIINE
Wilmar Subdivision
Weld County, Colorado
ATEC Project No. 41-64012
Prepared For:
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman Street
Suite 107
Longmont, Colorado 80501
Attention: Ms. Susan Ruptash
ATEC Associates, Inc.
A Ny 4860 uonton,Suite vD Indian Corporate ORler.
JJ Denver,Colorado 80239.2472 Indianapolis,IN
303-371-2640
Offices:
Atlanta,GA
Baltimore,MD
Birmingham,ILL
Chicago,IL
July I6, 1986 Cincinnati,OH
Dallas,TX
1 Dayton,OH
Denver.CO
Destin FL
Rocky Mountain Consultants,Inc. Gary,IN
500 Coffman Street Harrisburg,PA
1 Huntsville.Al.
Suite 107 Lexington,KY
Longmont, Colorado 80501 Louisville,KV
Newport,tsC
Raleigh NC
1
Salisbury,MD
Savarcatt GA
Attention: Ms. Susan Ruptash Washington Dc
Amlptes:
1 Alexandria.VA
111 Subject: Subsidence Potential,Graden Mine Norfolk,VA
Wilmar Subdivision
Weld County,Colorado
1 ATEC Project No. 41-64012
Dear Ms.Ruptash:
As per our agreement dated July 15, 1986, ATEC Associates,Inc. (ATEC)evaluated the potential
Ifor mine subsidence beneath the extreme northeast corner of the proposed Wilmar Subdivision in
Section 11, of Township 1 North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado. This study was
jundertaken without the benefit of any direct geotechnical data. No compression testing of rock core
samples was performed. All depths and thickness used in the evaluation were obtained from the
idrill hole results of a previous ATEC investigation, ATEC Project No. 41-53118. Average
] unconfined compressive strength of coal within the Laramie Formation was taken from previous
ATEC investigations. A detailed geologic description is presented in the previous report.
j
HISTORY
J
1 The Graden Mine was first opened in 1935. Total production during the 20 years of operation was
placed at 896,078 tons. Maximum yearly production of 92,354 tons occurred in 1944. Entry was
gained through a 325 foot deep double compartment shaft located 0.5 miles east of the proposed
Wilmar Subdivision. The mine was officially closed in 1955.
' Consulting Geotechnical,Environmental&Materials Engineers
al
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
July 16, 1986
Page 2
PILLAR STRENGTH ANALYSIS
The area of mine development beneath the extreme northeastern corner of lot 5 and the
northwestern corner of Lot 6, Block 1 (see Drawing 2 in the Appendix) should be considered as
non-developable until direct drill hole information is available. The following discussion outlines
ATEC's methods and procedures.
The method of pillar analysis used for this study is adapted from a paper by Goodman,Korbay and
Buchignani entitled"Evaluation of Collapse Potential Over Abandoned Room and Pillar Mines",
(1980). However, several adaptations and modifications had to be made for this study.
The stress on each pillar was calculated by multiplying the depth to the top of the "main" seam
(taken from the nearest drill hole)by the area supported by each pillar(i.e. tributary area equals 1/2
the distance between adjacent pillars) and multiplying that volume by 130 pounds per cubic foot
(pcf). The density value of 130 pcf was an average of the densities for roof and floor rock from
previous ATEC investigations.
The design strength of each individual pillar was calculated using the following formula:
qp = qu *N shape
F
Where: qp = pillar design strength
qu = compressive strength (300 psi, 1/2 the unconfined compressive
strength of previous coal sampled)
N shape = .875 + .25 width/height of pillar
F = safety factor(2)
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
July 16, 1986
Page 3
The N size correction of Goodman's formula was not applied because the rock mechanics data
collected for this study did not include the necessary information. Additionally, the skin effect
correction was not included because hand tool mining methods and the immediate flooding of the
mines would act to preserve the integrity of the pillar. ATEC assumes that the safety factor of 2
will compensate for not using the N size correction or skin effect correction. Additionally, the
unconfined compressive strength of 700 psi was divided by 2.
The height of each pillar was taken from the"main" coal seam thickness encountered in the nearest
drill hole. The narrowest width of the pillar was taken from the mine map. This analysis was
performed for all pillars investigated under the affected area, See Table No. 1. It resulted in 2 of
the pillars being below design strength. The below-design strength pillars are identified on
Drawing No. 2 in the Appendix.
CONCLUSIONS
t
ATEC recognizes that the data upon which the previous evaluation was performed is extremely
general. However, the built in conservatism in the present assessment, ( [1] 300 psi unconfined
compressive strength of coal when testing has shown samples in excess of 700 psi and [2] the
generous safety factor of 2)leads ATEC to conclude that:
1) Failure of the remaining above design strength pillars is extremely remote.
2) No restrictions should be placed,due to potential mine subsidence,on Lots
1,2,3,4,7 and 8 of Block 1 or Lots 1-9 of Block 2 of the proposed Wilmar
Subdivision.
3) Lots 5 and 6 of Block 1 should have additional geotechnical studies
performed including drilling, or not allow building within 250 feet of the
mine workings (this does not include the above design strength pillar's
evaluated in this report).
•
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
July 16, 1986
Page 4
CLOSIJRF,
The conclusions presented herein were developed from existing information obtained from field
exploration and laboratory testing on similar projects. Rock and groundwater conditions at those
locations may differ from conditions occurring within the study area. The nature and extent of
any variations may not become evident until a later date. If variations then appear evident it may be
necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report after performing on-site investigations
evaluating the characteristics of any variations.
Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations
prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices.
This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties,either express or implied.
Any persons using this lcpuit for bidding purposes should perform such independent investigation
as he deems necessary to satisfy himself as to the surface and subsurface conditions to be
encountered, and the procedures to be used in the performance of the work on this project.
It has been our pleasure to serve you on this project. If you have any questions,please contact the
undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
ATEC ASSOCIA
Greg D. Sherman, G
G technical Divisio Manager
GDS/Icrb F"' . n.
• •
TABLE 1
STRENGTH
PILLAR ANALYSIS
Thickness Jul
pillar No, Width Death of coal 912 2 Slit
1 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 280
2 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 278
3 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 267
4 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 321
5 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 256
6 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 287
7 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 283
8 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 296
* 9 25 250 7.5 5123 256.2 305
10 40 250 7.5 662.5 331.2 301
*11 25 250 7.5 512.5 256.2 575
12 50 250 7.5 762.5 381.2 361
13 65 250 7.5 912.5 456.2 305
' * Below design strength pillars
qp = Design strength of pillar
S1R = Divided by safety factor of 2
2
qo = Overburden stress
o A .5, 1 I I vl
sham o o Irl e crick
Mine I- ] .. r
1
35 I'
�floa M .'CJ II r.�✓1�
I I
1.1
II � / •• `• /1 , \
l _ _ _ __ _.— _ 1 _ — �. 4I -
Y]] .I 1 _ QS0O _ ,
rpihY 4982 1149]9 i— SOO -- ,Il-:II7-1 �
�/ \ ,� /I• lI 'I 1..-‘1:-.''
I ^J, ' /I
�v U sow L //I I �I acid
1
1)
/
I • \ /2 I - Ali
i
11,..../
• ] Boulder Valley.M Mine •
n 12_ // � ' r�� — T
a
�-. d 11 gedmg ��
(� ( t (7-
Mlne
�� ��
I'i < < ) i I ROJECT ��
�OT19N
1— II 5 %J / 1. SOBS o J p,� 1\1\
1/
p\\ \� 1.. l5/0.: /
N
� , , N. ��� ,.. � �
I
S // / \I it
/,J • k ,
:' ) , / .,
,, 1 � �`" III- .
) S/Op��J J�_ 1 i_Ji s 50J) J l_
SCALE . I" r 2000' ��% " 1 �, � �• ���y � � :0,..p.,,,,
a
PROJECT NO.
SITE VICINITY MAP 41 - 64012 AT�i
WILMAR SUBDIVISION DATE 117
JULY 1986
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
DRAWING NO. r'
1 I-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1
II. APPLICANTS RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS 4
III. GEOLOGIC HAZARD DEVELOPMENT - PERMIT PROCEDURAL GUIDE 6
IV. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 10
V. COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 13
VI. SECTION 5-1 WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 16
VII. SECTION 5-4 WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
OUTLINGING CRITERIA FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL 19
VIII. APPLICANTS LETTER OF COMPLIANCE 22
IX. PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 24
X. WELD COUNTY REFERRALS AND RESPONSES 27
XI. STATE OF COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 34
XII. COMMITMENT TO SERVE WATER FROM CWCWD 42
XIII. SOILS REPORT FROM EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC 45
XIV. PETITION FOR INCLUSION INTO DACONO SANITATION DISTRICT 54
XV. AGREEMENT AND COVENANT REGARDING SEWER SERVICES 55
XVI. ZONING RESOLUTION 56
• •
November 4, 1986
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NI NE} of Section 11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements
of Section 5-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the
applicant has shown compliance with Section 5-4 of the Weld County
Subdivision Regulations.
The Central Weld County Water District has committed to provide the water
supply to the Industrial Subdivision. The water supply system shall be
provided, consistent with the requirements of Section 8-10 of the Weld
county Subdivision Regulations, pursuant to the public water supply systems
and fire safety requirements.
The site has been determined to be suitable for individual septic disposal
systems by the Weld County Health Department. This determination is
conditional on the following items:
1. A reduction from 19 to 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies to predetermine the locations of the
leach fields on each lot.
3. A specific restriction of septic system capacity, type and
maximum square footage and therefore, maximum flow for each
specific lot.
4. A commitment to abandon the existing septic systems and
connect to a municipal system as soon as it becomes available
to the subdivision.
The septic systems shall be installed consistent with the requirements of
the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations and Section
8-9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
• •
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma Oase
Page 2
The site's soil is comprised of Kim Loam, Nunn Clay Loam, and Ulm Clay Loam,
which is classified as prime farmland by the Boulder Valley Soil
Conservation District. The proposed subdivision will not create soil
erosion, soil instability, or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold
water so that it results in an unstable, unhealthy, or dangerous condition
affecting human life or structures.
The industrial uses within the subdivision shall comply with all state and
County Health Department Regulations pertaining to air emission.
The proposal will not cause unreasonable highway congestion. Don Carroll,
Weld County Engineering Department, has reviewed this proposal and has set
forth no objections in a memo dated July 25, 1986.
Based upon the application materials and referral responses, the proposal
will not place an unreasonable burden on the school district, governmental
services providing water, sewage, fire, police, hospital, or solid waste
disposal. The Tri-Area Planning Commission has reviewed this request and
recommends approval.
The proposal will not have an undue adverse affect on the scenic or natural
beauty of the area and does not affect a historical site or a rare natural
area.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is
conditional upon the following:
1. The Wilmer Subdivision shall consist of only 13 lots.
, 2. Engineering studies shall be performed to predetermine the
location of leach fields for each lot. The final plat shall
reflect the engineered design location of the leach fields.
3. The septic system for each lot shall be restricted to the
engineered predetermined capacity, maximum square footage, and the
maximum flow. This information shall be reflected on the final
plat for each lot in the subdivision.
4. The developer shall provide evidence of a commitment to abandon
the existing septic systems and connect to a municipal system as
soon as it becomes available to the subdivision.
•
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma Oase
Page 3
5. The developer/owner shall petition to be included into the Dacono
Sanitation District. Evidence of the petition shall be included
in the final plat application.
6. The developer shall provide for the installation of fire hydrants
within the subdivision and along Weld County Road 12, the number
and location shall be determined by the Longmont Fire Protection
District. Hydrants shall be installed prior to any construction.
7. The proposed subdivision shall include a new eight (8) inch
diameter water main to provide a looped service when five lots
have been developed, or within two years, whichever may occur
first.
8. The final plat application shall include a letter of agreement
from Left Hand Water Supply Company regarding adequate water
supply for fire protection.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, site plans shall be
reviewed and approved in accordance with Section 23 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance.
10. A Geologic Hazard Overlay permit shall be obtained for Lots 4 and
5, Block 1, prior to the issuance of building permits.
D . 4uh'v ,A '4 ,45ttry (.akwol p( ; r.
Conditions 1 through 10 shall appear as notes on the Preliminary Plan
recorded plat.
Prior to the Board of county Commissioners hearing, the applicant and/or
developer shall provide evidence that the Colorado Geological Survey review
fee of $135.00 has been paid.
The final plat shall include the required utility service statement with all
appropriate signatures.
3
•
S
APPLICANT RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS
OUTLINED IN STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1 . The Wilmar Subdivision consists of 13 lots.
2. Engineering studies have been preformed by Mr. Ed Paas of Empire
Laboratories, Inc. to pre-determine the location of leach fields for each
lot. The location of each system' s leach field is shown on the Preliminary
Plat and will be shown on the Final Plat.
3. Mr. Ed Paas of Empire Laboratories, Inc. determined the capacity, maximum
square footage and maximum flow for the septic system on each lot. This
information is reflected in the table on the Preliminary Plat (a copy of
his report is enclosed).
4. See agreement to annex attached.
5. See petition to annex attached.
6. The developer shall provide for the installation of fire hydrants within
the Subdivision and along Weld County Road No. 12, the number and location
shall be determined by the Longmont Fire Protection District. Hydrants
shall be installed prior to any construction (see attached letter from
LFPD) .
7. The proposed subdivision shall include a new eight-inch (8) diameter water
main to provide a looped service when the LFPD deems it necessary in order
to provide adequate fire protection to serve the lots (see attached letter
from LFPD) .
4
8. The Final Plat application shall include a Letter of Agreement from Left
Hand Water Supply Company regarding adequate water supply for fire protec-
tion.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, site plans shall be reviewed and
approved in accordance with Section 23 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
10. A Geologic Hazard Overlay Permit shall be obtained for lots 4 and 5, Block
1 , prior to the issuance of building permits (see attached Procedural
Guide) .
11 . An Erosion Control Plan has been established under the direction of the
Soil Conservation Service and reviewed by them. Attached is a copy of that
plan.
5
HAND Post Office Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210
W•TE-
SUPPLY ISI
UML~ II (303) 652-2188, Metro (303) 443-2036
November 17, 1986
Jennifer Rodriguez
Rocky Mountain Consultants
500 Coffman St. Suite 107
Longmont, CO 80501
Re: Wilmer Subdivision
Dear Jennifer:
We are looking into the feasibility of a 6" connection
between our system and that of Central Weld to supply
additional flow to the above - referenced subdivision.
I have made some calculations of the flow we could
supply at certain pressures, and this information has
been forwarded to Dale 0lhausen at Central Weld.
Our Board of Directors will make the final decision on
whether or not we would want to have such a connection
and this will be done when a formal request from
Central Weld Water District is received.
Sincerely,
Terri Magnuson
Company Engineer
TM/rr
•
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. " 't "°° ""''
;4 asst
0.'•..h a �(✓ ' ��t r; 4
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 `�
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283
November 14, 1986
Captain William R. Emerson
Fire Marshal
Longmont Fire Protection District
9119 County Line Road
Longmont , CO 80501
RE: Wilmar Subdivision
Dear Captain Emerson:
This letter is a follow-up to our phone conversation today regarding your August
15, 1986 referral on the subject project. You had requested two modifications
(shown below in capital letters) to the course of action as proposed in Sue
Ruptash's letters of August 5, 1986.
1. OBTAIN A LETTER OF AGREEMENT FROM LEFT HAND WATER SUPPLY COMPANY (for the
temporary cross-connect)
The LHWSC monthly board meeting was held Monday, November 10, 1986. They
had not yet received a formal request from CWCWD to consider this request.
Mr. Dale Olhausen, Manager for CWCWD has been asked to write this request
and LHWSC should take it up at their December meeting. Approval of this
cross-connect is tantamount to the developer's request for Phase I water
supply and fire protection. Since this project is only at the Preliminary
Plat stage, we request that you allow us to proceed into Final Plat stage,
knowing that LHWSC will discuss it at their December meeting and that,
without an agreement, the developers will not obtain Final Plat approval .
You also indicated that for your approval at Final Plat stage, we would have
to provide you with the engineering calculations to show sufficient volume
of flow could be provided to fight a fire in the Phase I condition.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 8-INCH DIAMETER WATER MAIN TO PROVIDE A LOOPED
SERVICE, WHEN 5 LOTS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED OR WITHIN 2 YEARS, WHICHEVER MAY
OCCUR FIRST.
In a letter dated July 25, 1986, Dale Olhausen stated that CWCWD will be
seeking $96,000 in plant investment fees from Wilmar Subdivision. In a
phone conversation with him November 10, 1986, he said that this fee would
Letter to Captain William R. Emerson
Page 2 of 2
cover the cost of either a 6" or an 8" main. The way your stipulation
reads, the Oase's would be required to construct the water line in two years
even if none of the lots have been sold. You agreed that this was not your
intent and that, instead, you wanted the ability to evaluate each proposed
use within the project as to its fire protection needs. The loop might be
needed sooner than two years or not until later from the standpoint of the
LFPD. We are in agreement to proceed on the basis of reviewing with you the
fire protection need of each proposed use and when you and/or the CWCWD feel
the loop is warranted, the fees will be paid by the developers.
3. Provide for the installation of fire hydrants within the subdivision and
along WCR #12, number and location to be determined by L.F.P.D. hydrants
shall be installed prior to any construction.
To clarify "hydrants shall be installed prior to any construction" the
intent is to have fire hydrants installed and in service only as each lot is
sold and prior to construction on said lot .
If you are in agreement with the conditions of this letter, please indicate so
by signing below. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
John B. Cummings, Jr., P.E.
cc: Dale Olhausen, CWCWD
Jim Dickey, LHWSC
Martin and Wilma Oase
CONCURRENCE BY:
4-5116 �l
William R. Emerson Date
Fire Marshal
Longmont Fire Protection District
GEOLOGIC HAZARD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PROCEDURAL GUIDE
The purpose of this packet is to provide an applicant for a Geologic Hazard
Development Permit information on the review process, the application
submittal requirements, and the responsibilities of the parties involved.
This packet is organized as follows:
I. A brief explanation of the process for reviewing a Geologic Hazard
Development Permit Application.
II. An outline of the determinations to be made by the Department of Planning
Services in reviewing an application for a Geologic Hazard Development
Permit.
III. Application requirements for a Geologic Hazard Development Permit.
The applicant is encouraged to contact the Department of Planning Services staff
to resolve any question which might arise at any time in the process. In
particular the applicant is encouraged to keep in close contact with the Depart-
ment of-Planning Services staff once an application has been submitted to keep
abreast of any developments pertaining to the case.
I. Review Process for a Development Permit Request
Sections 27 and 52 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance detail the procedure
to be followed in processing a Geologic Hazard Development Permit Application
and the responsibilities of the applicant and the Department of Planning
Services staff. The following brief description is a synopsis of those
sections of the Zoning Ordinance (available at the office of the Weld
County Department of Planning Services) .
Once a complete application for a Geologic Hazard Development Permit is
submitted, the Department of Planning Services staff does the following:
A. Refers the case to applicable agencies for their review and comment.
B. Review the proposal for. conformance with the standards set forth in
Sections 27.4 and 52.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
C. Notify the applicant in writing of the decision reached regarding
the Geologic Hazard Development Permit.
D. If approved, attach a copy of the certification of approval of the
Geologic Hazard Development Permit to the appropriate building permit.
'
Geologic Hazard Development Permit
Procedural Guide
Page 2
II. Standards. The Department of Planning Services shall not issue a Geologic
Hazard Overlay District Permit until it has determined that all applicable
standards specified in this Section have been met by the applicant.
A. Applicants seeking a permit to develop in a regulated geologic
hazard area must demonstrate to the Department of Planning Services
through required maps and reports that all significant geologic
hazards to public health and safety and to property shall be
minimized by using mitigating techniques. These maps and reports
shall be certified by a registered professional engineer who shall
certify that the design of the proposal ensures the protection of
human life and property from the adverse impacts of geologic hazards
to the greatest extent possible.
B. Any construction approved by the Department of Planning Services
within a regulated geologic hazard area shall be supervised by a
qualified professional engineer. Engineering techniques to mitigate
geologic hazard conditions at the site shall be employed.
C. Qualifications of Investigators. All geologic maps and reports
required by these regulations shall be prepared by or under the
directions of, and shall be signed by a professional geologist
as defined by Sections 34-1-201, et. seq. , Colorado Revised Statutes
1973. All engineering work required by these regulations shall be
prepared by or under the direction of a registered professional
engineer as defined in Section 12-25-101, et. seq. , Colorado Re-
vised Statutes, 1973.
III. Application Requirements. Geologic Hazard Overlay District Development
Permit applications submitted for review shall include the following in-
formation. Applications containing less than the specified requirements
shall not be accepted for review unless the applicant has submitted to
and had approved by the Department of Planning Services written justificati
as. to why a particular requirement does not pertain to the proposed
development.
A. A map portraying the geologic conditions of the area with particular
attention given to the specific regulated geologic hazards. The
map shall be delineated in drawing ink on mylar or other drafting
medium approved by the Department of Planning Services. The
dimensions of the map shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-
six (36) inches. The map shall be prepared at a 1" = 100' scale
and shall include the parcel in question, as well as features
within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries. The scale of the map
may be reduced or enlarged upon approval of the Department of
Planning Services. Such map shall also include:
r41:;*° no
1
Geologic Hazard Development Permit
Procedural Guide
Page 3
1. A certified boundary survey of the property for
which application is made. Bearings and distances
of all perimeter boundary lines shall be indicated
•
outside the boundary lines.
2. The topography of the area at ten (10) foot contour
intervals or at intervals as determined by the Board
of County Commissioners or its authorized representative.
3. Existing structures and landscape features, including
the name and location of all watercourses, ponds, and
other bodies of water.
4. Proposed building locations and arrangements.
5. The legend shall include a complete and accurate legal
description as prescribed by the development permit
application form. The description shall include the
total acreage of the surveyed parcel.
6. Certificates. (1) Engineer's Certificate; (2) Surveyor's
Certificate.
7. Title, scale and north arrow.
8. Date, including revision dates if applicable.
9. Such additional information as may be required by the Board
of County Commissioners.
B. A geologic report explaining the above maps with particular emphasis
on evaluating and predicting the impact of such geologic conditions
on the proposed land use changes and developments. The report shall
also include recommended mitigating procedures to be employed in meetin
the intent and purposes of this regulation. Specific requirements
of said report are listed below.
1. Ground Subsidence Areas. Applications for development in
ground subsidence areas shall include, but not be limited
to, the following information or data, where applicable.
a. Amount of material removed or materials subject to
volume decrease.
b. Interval between the ground surface and the location
of void space or materials subject to volume decrease.
• •
Geologic Hazard Development Permit
Procedural Guide
Page 4
c. In poorly consolidated aquifers, the effect of pore
fluid withdrawal.
d. In wind deposited silt (loess) areas, and areas of
predominantly fine-grained colluvial soils, the amount
of wetting the area is subject to and its effect.
e. In areas of soluble materials, the effect of wetting.
f. In areas of underground mining, data regarding air
shafts, haulage ways, adits, faults, rooms and pillars,
and final mine maps.
g. Building type and proportion.
h. Pertinent geologic and hydrologic factors of the area.
i. Test hole and well log data.
j . Mitigation techniques that will be employed, including
effectiveness and estimated cost of such techniques.
k. Pertinent historic factors including, but not limited
to, past occurences of ground subsidence in the area
proposed for development.
•
.m i rg
a •
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
WILMAR SUBDIVISION
The development of each lot within the Wilmar Subdivision shall conform to
U.S. Soil Conservation Service Standards regarding temporary and permanent erosion
control .
A detailed drainage report will be provided at the final plat stage and
detention ponds will be designed on a per lot basis.
Permanent erosion control shall consist of the following:
1 . In the event that animals other than domestic pets are to be housed on
any of the lots which are platted in the Wilmar Subdivision, they must
be confined by means of a fence or other comparable barriers, and shall
have a plan by which permanent vegetative cover shall be maintained.
2. Erosion of ground surface must be mitigated through the use of
windbreaks; these barriers should consist of vegetative or non-vegetative
materials spaced in accord with Soil Conservation Services recommended
practices.
3. Increased drainage runoff must be managed through the use of on-site
ponds or other acceptable practices as established by the Weld County
Engineering Standards and by the Soil Conservation Service.
4. Areas disturbed during construction shall be landscaped or graded
and seeded between October 31 and April 30 with Luna Pubescent
Wheatgrass at a rate of 9 lbs./acre.
10
Temporary Erosion Control
Required during construction until permanent erosion control measures can
be established shall include:
1 . Seeding of top soil stock piles and other disturbed areas with forage
sorgum at a rate of 10-15 lbs/acre from June 1 to July 1 to prevent
erosion.
2. Mulching at a rate of 2 tons/acre with clean straw from July 1 to
October 31 .
3. See attached detail regarding drainage runoff temporary erosion control .
II
Temporary Erosion Controll-
Required during construction until permanent erosion control measures can be
established.
110. (I,{ :N1CN
1.'4“1
•
I•f. 3'
P/4
///n
*C/ ML(AS( S'StC1Wt •I••,
(KC DOM.OM DNAIM. •
P NI tPY
ELEVATION
{PVC PIP(IK RI M1I ON•i CDI� A
�.�ty.ISC%rm..° { PVC<C ON. (�'�
-2:Z Pkw: II O O
ELEVATION I D O
rl liMsNLLY
'C
o I
SANDS ACt I
O O
NAY nil
CNYCC DAM O O
•
•
PLAN ‘1.1j PLAN
DETAIL _ DETAIL
TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION INLET SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION
POND ' bill.
( TYPICAL ALL DETENTION PONOSJ
NT S
TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
REQUIREQ DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL
SYSTEM HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
I A•
S-264:86:9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase
Page 2
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on November 4, 1986, and recorded in Book No. X of the proceedings of the
said Planning Commission.
Dated the 5th day of November, 1986.
Bobbie Good
Secretary
� 7i
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Ann Garrison that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld
County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. Case
ADDRESS: 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, Colorado 80516
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N} NE} of Section 11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the
following reasons:
Based on the fact that the Weld County Comprehensive Plan has suggested that
the best kind of economic growth is economic growth that borders current
cities or towns and this particular subdivision would not border any city or
town. .
Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Lydia Dunbar
Lynn Brown
LeAnn Reid
Ivan Gosnell
Louis Rademacher
Paulette Weaver
Ann Garrison
Jack Holman
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County
• Commissioners for further proceedings.
I%5
• •
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 5
CASE NUMBER: S-264:86:9
APPLICANT: Martin and Wilma J. Oase
REQUEST: Subdivision, Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ni NE} of Section 11 , TIN, R68W of the Gth P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of Dacono; south of Weld County Road
12 and west of Weld County Road 11
APPEARANCE:
Jennifer Rodriguez, Planning Consultant, Rocky Mountain Consultants,
represented the applicants. This property is currently zoned Industrial
Three. The applicants have changed the lot configurations from nineteen to
thirteen lots partly in response the the Health Department's requirements
to allow each lot to be large enough to handle individual septic systems
until the applicants can go onto a public sewer system. The final plat will
locate the individually engineered septic systems. They have met with the
Dacono Planning Commission, Town Beard, and Sanitation District. This
property is in Dacono's town growth plan and if annexed, they can go onto
the sewer system. They will comply with all recommendations made by the
Dacono Fire Department. They are in full agreement with the staff's
recommendations, and conditions with the exception of 117. Central Weld
County Water District has guaranteed water for five or six lots for a period
of two years.
Wes Potter reported lots sizes were figured for each pre-engineered septic
system. Therefore the types of industrial uses that can go into this
subdivision will be limited to what each individual septic system can
handle.
Tape 254 - Side 2
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved the applicant work out a conservation plan with the
Soil Conservation Service before they can go to the Board of County
Commissioners with a Preliminary Plan. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Lee Morrison reported he had spoken with the applicant's counsel. They
discussed concepts and not proposals.
I4-
•
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 6
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked that reading of the staff's recommendations and
conditions be dispensed with and that they be filed with the summary as a
permanent record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Ann Garrison moved Case Number S-264:86:9 for Martin and Wilma J. Case for a
subdivision preliminary plan be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based
on the fact that the Weld County Comprehensive Plan has suggested that the
best king of economic growth is economic growth that borders current cities
or towns and this particular subdivision would not border any city or town.
Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
commission for their decision. Lydia Dunbar - Yea; Lynn Brown - Yes, and in
addition to the reasons cited, she has a great deal of concern about the
proliferation of additional septic systems in an area like this. LcAnn
Reid - Yes; Ivan Gosnell - Yes; Louis Rademacher - Yes; Paulette
Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yea, for all of the reasons
already stated. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:45
APPLICANT: Monfort of Colorado
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit fur an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of corporate complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} and part of the NEI of Section 30, TGN,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile north of Greeley City Limits; north of Weld
County Road 64 and west of U.S. Highway 85
APPEARANCE:
Kay Norton, Associate General Counsel, Monfort of Colorado, represented the
applicants. This is Monfort's Corporate Headauarters and has previously
been a nonconforming use. Any expansion of a nonconforming use requires a
Use by Special Review permit to be taken out and that is why they are here.
The expansion is less than ten percent of their space and will include four
new employees. This will be used primarily by computer services. The
building is nearly completed. They applied for the building permit and were
told they
iiii .
• is
SECTION 5 PRELIMINARY PLAN
5-1 Submission Requirements
Copies of all required material shall be officially submitted to the
N Planning Department and Planning Commission offices by the subdivider
(or his authorized representative) . A preliminary plan filing fee
shall accompany the submittal in accordance with the fee schedule as
adopted by resolution of the Board.
A. Plan Requirements
10
I (1) One copy of an Application for Approval of a Preliminary Plan
and all required supporting documents.
Ili (2) An adequate number of black on white or blue on white prints
of each sheet of the Preliminary Plan to provide the Planning
Commission and other agencies sufficient copies for their
II review.
(3) A receipt shall be issued to the subdivider for the
Preliminary Plan submission when it has been determined that
the submission includes all the requirements set forth in
these regulations. The date of the Planning Commission-.( meeting to review the plans shall be specified on the
receipt.
B. Drawing Requirements
The Preliminary Plan may be drawn with scaled dimensions and need
not be an engineering drawing with calculations or dimensions and
survey closures. A workman—like execution of the plan shall be
made in every detail. A poorly drawn or illegible plan is
sufficient cause for its rejection.
The following data shall be submitted as part of the Preliminary
Plan submission:
(1) A Vicinity Map, at one inch to 600 foot scale, showing
perimeter outline of the proposed subdivision, accesses,
abutting subdivision outlines and names, zoning districts,
taxing districts, and other special districts, and other
relevant information within one—half ('1s.) mile distance of the
perimeter of the proposed subdivision.
(2) Outer boundary lines of the proposed subdivision.
(3) The preliminary plan shall be drawn to a scale less than one
inch (1") equals one hundred (100) feet (unless a variation
Ili from this scale is allowed by the Planner due to the size and
nature of the proposed development) , and shall indicate the
basis of bearings; true north point; name of the subdivision;
. township, range, section and quarter section; block and lot
number (of the property under consideration) .
lv
Ito
• •
(4) The preliminary plan shall contain existing contours at two
(2) foot intervals for predominant ground slopes within the
tract between level and five percent (5%) grade and five
foot (5') contours for predominant ground slopes within the
tract over five percent (5%) grade. Elevations shall be
based on National Geodetic Survey sea level data. In cases
of predominantly level topography throughout a subdivision,
one foot (1') interval contours may be required.
(5) Total acreage of entire proposed subdivision.
(6) Lot and street layout, including proposed future street
layout in dashed line for any portion or parcel of adjacent
land not being subdivided now.
(7) Existing street names.
(8) Dimensions of all lots to nearest foot which may be scaled
values.
(9) Lot and blocks numbered consecutively.
(10) Location, size and use of all existing and proposed public
and private easements.
(11) Existing and proposed water mains, fire hydrants, sewers
utility mains (electric, gas, telephone) or other underground
structures within the subdivision and at least 100 feet
immediately adjacent to boundary streets.
(12) Area of each lot in square feet if lot size is less than one
acre and in acres otherwise.
(13) Water courses and proposed storm water drainage systems
including culverts, water areas, streams, areas subject to
occasional flooding and high ground water, marshy areas and
swamps. (Note: detail design of drainage structures not
required for preliminary plan.)
(14) The approximate boundaries of areas subject to inundation or
storm water overflows of an intensity estimated to occur with
a return frequency of once every 50 years and once every 100
years.
(15) Existing buildings, other easements, telephone lines, gas
lines, power lines, and other features located on the
subdivision and within two hundred (200) feet of its
boundaries.
(16) Location and ownership of irrigation ditches and other
structures appurtenant to irrigation systems.
-(17) Abutting property lines and the respective owners' names.
IR
11
• •
(18) General location in the subdivision area of trees over
six (6) inches in diameter, measured at six (6) feet above
ground. In cases of heavily wooded areas, indicate the
outline of wooded area and location of trees which are to
remain. It is the__intent of this requirement to determine
the approximate location of trees for design evaluation
rather than to require unnecessary surveying of exact tree
location.
(19) Proposed sites to be reserved or dedicated for parks,
playgrounds, schools, or other public uses.
(20) Proposed sites, if any, for multi—family dwellings, shopping
centers, community facilities, industry, or other uses,
exclusive of single family dwellings.
(21) Location, function, ownership and manner of maintenance of
common open space reserved or dedicated for the use and
benefit of the owners and future owners of the proposed
subdivision.
(22) The substance of all other covenants, grants of easements or
restrictions to be imposed upon the use of land, buildings,
and structures.
1
(23) An affidavit that the applicant is the owner, equitable owner
or authorized by the owner, in writing, to make application
for the land proposed to be subdivided.
5-2 Supporting Documents Required
The following material shall accompany the Preliminary Plan and be
considered a part of the submission:
A. Three copies of the Sewage Disposal Report as required by the
Planning Commission.
B. Geologic maps and investigation reports regarding area suitability
for the proposed development.
C. Soil type maps and tables of soil type interpretations prepared as
part of the Sketch Plan submission, based on the National
Cooperative Soils Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil
Conservation Service, provided by the Soil Conservation District.
D. A letter from each special district, municipality or utility
company involved addressed to the Planning Commission, and a
utility service statement accompanied by a plat signed by the
appropriate representative stating that specific services and/or
utilities are available and they have reviewed the plan and are
setting forth their comments concerning the extent of services and
the design of utility easements.
Pc,' rien
•
IS
• •
' I. Planner
' The Planner shall ensure the completeness of the Preliminary Plan
submission and shall insure its conformance with the Comprehensive
Plan and good subdivision design practices. The Planner shall
' make a report of his review of the Preliminary Plan to the
Planning Commission.
' 5-4 Approval. or Disapproval — Preliminary Plan
A. A Preliminary Plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission
unless it finds that the Preliminary Plan fails to meet the
' requirements specified herein or that the proposed preliminary
plan is detrimental to the public health, safety, or general
welfare as set forth in this Section as follows:
(1) Health, Safety, and Welfare
' Before approving the Preliminary Plan, the Planning
Commission shall determine that the subdivision:
(a) Will be served by a public water system or, if less than
' ten lots, will have sufficient well water available per
lot, both physically and legally, for the foreseeable
needs of the subdivision or development, and will not
cause an unreasonable depreciation of an existing water
supply as evaluated by the State Engineer. Evidence
regarding water supply: quality, quantity, and
dependability. Evidence may include: evidence of
ownership or right of acquisition of or use of existing
and proposed water rights; historic use and estimated
yield of claimed water rights; amenability of existing
rights to a change in use; evidence that public or
private water owners can and will supply water to the
proposed subdivision stating the amount of water
available for use within the subdivision and the
feasibility of extending service to that area; evidence
concerning the potability of the proposed water supply
for the subdivision.
(b) Will be served by a public sanitation system or on—lot
sewage disposal system that will not result in water
pollution. In making this latter determination, the
Planning Commission shall consider: the amount of
rainfall received by the area; the relation of the land
to flood plains; the nature of soils and subsoils and
their ability to adequately support waste disposal; the
slope of the land and the effect of effluents; the
presence of streams as related to effluent disposal; the
applicable health and water resources department
regulations.
(c) Will not cause soil erosion, soil instability or
reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so
that it results in an unstable, unhealthy or dangerous
condition affecting human life or structures.
(d) Will not cause air pollution based on state health
department standards. In making this determination they
shall consider the elevation of land above sea level;
land topography; prevailing winds or the absence
thereof; local and regional airsheds; increase in
sources or quantity of emission, as well as quality of
such, and such other items as are deemed pertinent.
(e) Will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe
conditions with respect to use of the highways existing
or proposed; will not cause unreasonable burden on the
ability of a school district to provide educational
services; will not place an unreasonable burden on the
ability of the local governments to provide water,
sewage, fire, police, hospital, solid waste disposal and
other services.
(f) Will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or
natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historical sites
or rare and irreplaceable natural areas; will not have
an undue adverse effect on wildlife and their habitat,
and on the preservation of agricultural land.
B. Data and Investigations
The Planning Commission may conduct such investigations,
examinations, test and site evaluations as they deem necessary to
verify information contained in the application. An applicant
shall grant the Planning Commission, or their agents, permission
to enter upon his land for these purposes.
C. Recommendation
The Planning Commission shall review the Preliminary Plan at a
regularly scheduled public meeting. Within ten (10) days after
the Planning Commission has made a final recommendation as to the
Preliminary Plan approval or disapproval, the Planning Commission
shall send written notification of its review and its
recommendations concerning the Preliminary Plan to the Board.
D. Burden of Proof
The burden of proof shall be on the subdivider to show the
reasonableness of his plan, the lack of adverse effect, and
compliance with the elements of the public health, safety, and
general welfare as set forth in Section 5-4-A.
E. Board Hearing
- The Board shall hold a hearing on the Preliminary Plan at a
regularly scheduled Board meeting within ten (10) days of receipt
14 C 'G'.21
LO
• •
of transmittal of the Planning Commission recommendation. If the
Board determines that the
E. Board Hearing
The Board shall hold a hearing on the Preliminary Plan at a
regularly scheduled Board meeting within ten (10) days of receipt
of transmittal of the Planning Commission recommendation. If the
Board determines that the Preliminary Plan submission complies
with the applicable requirements of these regulations, it shall
authorize the subdivider to proceed with the Final Plat, subject
to such terms, conditions or modifications as the Board determines
to be appropriate.
F. Plan Disapproval. and Reapplication
Disapproval of a Preliminary Plan shall contain in writing the
specific reasons for disapproval. A subdivider may, within six
(6) months, resubmit his plan application which shall include an
affidavit to the Planning Commission and Board that the
deficiencies in the previous application have been corrected
without paying additional fees. A review of the reapplication
shall follow the same review as outline in these regulations for a
new application. Any reapplication after six (6) months will
require a new fee.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a5 21
• •
APPLICANTS LETTER OF COMPLIANCE
5.1
A.
1 . Application filed at time of submittal .
2. Prints submitted (20 copies) (June 2, 1986).
3. Receipt - Letter dated July 22, 1986 to Mr. & Mrs. Oase from
Gloria Dunn.
- Application complete and in order at this time.
B. All items addressed in Section B are shown on the Preliminary Plat.
Included with the title work is an ownership affidavit.
5.4
A.
1 . Health, Safety and Welfare
a. The subject property will be served by the Central Weld County Water
District (see attached letter). Additional water pressure needed to
meet fire flow requirements will be provided by a cross-over connection
with Left Hand Water Supply (see attached letter) .
b. Extensive soils testing has been done on the site by Mr. Ed Paas of
Empire Laboratory, Inc. Septic systems have been located on each lot
based on the results of those tests. Additional restrictions as to
size and capacity of the systems has also been added to the preliminary
plat. A commitment to abandon the existing septic systems and connect
to a municipal system once it becomes available has also been provided.
All septic systems shall be installed consistent with the requirements
of the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations and
shall conform to Section 8-9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations.
2Z
i !
c. An erosion control plan has been submitted to and approved by the U.S.
Soil Conservation Service. Development of this site will not cause
soil instability or reduction of the capability of the land to hold
water or result in an unstable, unhealthy or dangerous condition
affecting human life or structures.
d. Development on this site will meet all State Health Department
Standards regarding air pollution.
e. Development of the site shall provide for a safe, unconjested traffic
pattern on both existing and proposed streets. As an industrial
development, no additional burden will be placed on the school system.
Adequate water service, fire protection, police protection, solid waste
disposal can be provided for this site.
f. There are no historical sites or rare or irreplaceable natural areas on
the site which will be effected by development. The wildlife in the
area will not be significantly impacted. Development of this site as
industrial lots will be compatable with the surrounding land use. The
parcel adjacent to this site on the west is an auto salvage yard. The
remainder of the surrounding property is zoned to the north, to
the east and _ to the south.
29
• PRELIMINARY PLAN •
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Department of Planning Services, 915 - 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado
PHONE : 356=4000 Ext . 404
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:
CASE NO. APPL. FEE
`ZONING DISTRICT RECORDING FEE
DATE _ RECEIPT NO.
APPL. CHECKED BY
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required
signatures) :
I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County
Planning Commission concerning proposed subdivision of the following
described unincorporated area of Weld County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION :
The N2 of the NEB of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. ,
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the Community Consolidated Canal
and Reservoir Company by Deed recorded July 29, 1908 in Book 283 at Page 140,
Weld County Records.
:If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet of this same
;ize. )
LAKE OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION _ Wilmar Subdivision
1XISTING ZONING 1-3 PROPOSED ZONING 1_3
'OTAL AREA (ACRES) 80.479 NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS
16
.OT SIZE: AVERAGE4-6 MINIMUM 2.3 acres
'TILITIES: WATER: NAME
Central Weld County Water
SEWER: NAME Individual Septic Systems
GAS : NAME Rocky Mountain Gas
PHONE: NAME Mountain Bell
'ISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME Not Applirable
FIRE: NAME Longmont Rural Fire District
ESIGNERS ' NAME Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
DDRESS 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 Longmont, CO 80501 PHONE 772-b282 •
NGINEERS ' NAME Camp
DDRESS PHONE
EE OWNER OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SUBDIVISION
AME Martin Oast' and Wilma J . Oase
DDRESS 4784 Weld County Road 12, Erie, CO 80516 PRONE 654-0867
AME
DDRESS
AME PHONE
DDRESS
PHONE
hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements,
roposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this annlication
re true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
OUNTY OF WELD )
CATE OF COLORADO) //
Sign//2::04-
tu /re : Owner or Authorized Agent
zbscribed and sworn to before me this
r2 day of r 19g.‘
•
SEAL
PUBLIC
commission expires:
)4-79-028 ?'?'
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
i.
1 4 j
b •
1��+
500 Coltman Street, Suite 107 •Longmont,CO 80501•(303) 772-5282 ' ?'r. tie ' i
Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO •Denver line: 665-6283
June 2, 1986
Ms. Debbie de 8esche
Department of Planning Services
Weld County
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : Wilmar Subdivision (formerly Oase Subdivision)
Dear Debbie:
Please find enclosed our submission for Preliminary Plan for the Wilmar
Subdivision. (Formerly the Oase Subdivision) . We have enclosed the following
items:
1) Filing fee ($275.00)
2) Preliminary Plan Subdivision Application (20 copies)
3) Preliminary Plan (20 copies)
4) Surrounding Property Owner' s Report (Delivered under separate cover)
We wish to update you on the status of other items relevant to this submittal :
Colorado Geological Survey: We are meeting with them this week
to solicit their review.
Central Weld County Water: We have been as yet unable to schedule
a meeting and will do so as soon as possible.
Sewage Disposal Report: Two recent tests by Weld County Health Department
and three existing systems on the site in good working order attest to the
feasibility of standard septic systems . We can provide more information if
so requested by your office.
•
Page 2
Ms. Debbie de Besche
Longmont Rural Fire District: We wish to wait for comments from the Water
Supply Company prior to resuming discussions with the Fire District.
Other Utilities: All necessary services exist to the site. We will meet
with gas, telephone and electric companies this week to solicit their
recommendations.
Road Maintenance Agreement: We are preparing a draft copy per the
suggestion and for the approval of Mr. Don Carroll , Engineering Department.
Covenants: The Owners wish to prepare covenants to exclude any uses that
emit offensive or noxious fumes. They may also include any construction
restrictions that may be necessary to satisfy the Fire District require-
ments. These will be drafted after all related comments are received.
Please call us should you have any questions or need any further information in
order to process this application. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC.
S. M. Ruptash
Enclosures
•
.r r
,rtes)
• DEPAR •NOFI ANtING SERVICE;
•_ • c� PHONE(909)358-4000 EXT.440
tilstF4C1 915 10th STREE
JI► y GREELEY,COLORADO B087
•-•.,
:;1'"s
COLORADO
July 22, 1986
•
Martin and Wilma J. Ouse
4784 Weld County Road 12
Erie, CO 80516
Re: S-264:86:9 Request for a Subdivision - preliminary plan on a parcel of
land described the Ni NE} of Section 11, TIN, RGBW of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ouse:
Your application and related materials for the request described above are
complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with
the Planning Commission on August 19, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will
take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld
County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Creeley, Colorado. It is
recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any
questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your
application.
It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to
any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in
question or if the property under consideration is located within the
comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore , our
office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Tri Aria
Planning Commission for their review and comments. Please contact Rebecca
Marker at 740-7100 for further details regarding the date, time and place of
this meeting.
It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the
property under consideration at least ten (10) days preceding the hearing
date. .. Please be sure the sign is posted no later than August 9, 1986.
•
nn
L1
•
•
Martin & Wilma Oase
July 21, 1986
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call
me.
Respectfully,
LEA V
Dunn
Gla..is V. ..D..r,..
Current Planner
CVD:dy
Enclosure
P.c. Sue Ruptash
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107
Longmont, CO 80501
P.S. Utility Coordinating Advisory Committee will meet Thursday, August 14,
1986, at 10:00 a.m.
•
I GO
• DEPARTEINT OF PLANNING SERVICES
{
; ti6
?� PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT. 4401
^ t VY 915 10th STREE'
GREELEY,COLORADO 80037 -ill
I r�T )
A ;� ,
L.
COLORADO
CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
•
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: •
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision —
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the N} NE} of Section
11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile 'west of Dacono, south. of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted prior to
3. X Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: Riv5/ . y�' ����, Agency: Boulder Valley Date: August 1, 1986
o "J Soil Conservation District
Gloria V. Dunn �`,, -n' I
Cu Oren Planner D � �2i��.1
QC) 03 1980
�:, ,, 00,
n -' `� Weld Cu. Planning Cummissiou
Boulder Valley Soil Conservation District
9595 Nekon Road, Box D • Longmont, Colorado 80501
April 21, 1986
Ms. Debbie deBesche, Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case No. S-262:86:7 — Martin & Wilma Oase Subdivision
Dear Debbie:
•
The proposed site of the Oase Subdivision is to be located on some
unfavorable soils. Soils on this site include Kim loam, 1-3% slopes,
Kim loam, 5-9% slopes, Alm clay loam, 3-5% slopes, and Nunn loam,
1-3% slopes.
Suitability for homes and buildings on Kim loam soils has moderate
limitations due to the low strength of the soil. Nunn loam and Ulm
clay loam also have low strength, coupled with a shrink—swell potential
which may heave and cause cracks in the building foundation. These
limitations do not mean buildings cannot be built there, they will just
need special consideration and protective measures during construction.
On—site sewage systems also have severe limitations on these soils.
The Nunn loam and the Ulm clay loam have slow percolation rates and
the Ulm soils will seep. The Kim loams also tend to seep and are
somewhat limited by the slope of the land.
Erosion control, especially on dryland sites, during construction is
another issue that needs to be addressed. The dust will need to be
controlled during and after construction.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this proposed land development.
If we can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Jack C. Wheeler
President
JCW:rah
tn.P•nie, •)•-)
7D
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT • SELF-GOVERNMENT
• DEPART$NT OF PLANNING SERVICES
s L__ PHONE (303)356.4000 EXT.4401
�� ,� 915 10th STREF
tertv sj �} GREELEY,COLORADO 8063
51;40 11 l S i .
14:1•,‘�3 y :zr :ska:"� JUL 1986 r)
COLORADO1
`a- "noN
Oh�T1;CT w CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
1
CON0610NT Oo,
/
ti~
July 21, 1986 . /. t3 %`
TO WHOM IT MAX CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision —
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the N} NEI of Section
11, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
' submitted prior to ,
3. XX Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: lc / do,,,,,,, Agency: Longmont Date: 24 August 1986
William R. Emerson Fire Prot. Dist
o7�Z —
4,..„..;. , 4„..,_
. DunnpTPlanner
` ' JUL 291980
NeI Cu. PI:ton SS:mnrssimo
..
.`p,lGMpyf
1. 1: �" LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
. .",,7•t
AA
': :: ° 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710
\` OlFC(t�� David Dierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec.Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Nuts
Fire Chiel Director Director Director Director Director
15 August 1986
Its. Susan Ruptash — Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 •
Longmont, Colorado 80501
1 RE: Wilmar Subdivision
•
Dear Ms. Ruptash:
Having reviewed all correspondence received to date and in consideration of your
request of the Longmont Fire Protection District (LFPD) to reconsider the requirement
for an on—site 300,000 gallon water storage tank for fire protection, we agree with
the course of action outlined in your letters of August 5, 1986, with the following
modifications:
•
PHASE I
Obtain a letter of agreement from Left Hand Water Supply Company.
Provide for the installation of fire hydrants within the subdivision and along
WCR 1112, number and location to be determined by LFPD. Hydrants shall be
installed prior to any construction.
PHASE II
Construction of a new 8 inch diameter water main to provide a looped service,
when 5 lots have been developed or within 2 years, whichever may occur first.
Taking the above course of action will eliminate LIPD's requirement for a 300,000
gallon on—site water storage tank.
Should you have any questions please call this office.
Sincerely,
-24114.--An-e. 9
William R. Emerson
fire Marshal
WRE/wre
Copies: Board of Directors (5) D XS7 E
Secretary/Attorney
District Chief -tte 10 1986
File (3)
Weld CD. N2rtnint CDmmissioD
`a eY•
LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
'v'.. of/
9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 8O5O1 (303) 772-0710
o David Diorwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holuboc•Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Noss
cr,os
Fire Chief Director Director Diloctor Director Director
•
June 30 , 1986
Ms. Susan Ruptash, Designer
Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc .
500 Coffman Street, Suite 107
Longmont . CO 80501
• Dear Ms . Ruptash,
This letter will document our recent meeting regarding
the Wilmer (Oase) Subdivision. As we discussed, the April
11 , 1986 let e fir=to you from Central Weld County Water
District (CWCWD) leads us to believe, that a firm cornmittrrent
to upgrade the existing water system is not likely in the
near future.
Therefore , we require an on site water supply of not
less than 300 , 000 gallons of water • for fire protection. This
supply source could be an elevated metal storage tank ,
gravity flow typo or a ground level tank or an embankment
supported , rubberized, fabric suction storage tank . All
require automatic fire pumps , valves , etc . The water supply
could still come from CWCWD. The water level in the tank
must be maintained automatically with pipe size to fill the
tank within eight hours .
In addition , the covenants of the development shall
require:
I . Property owners to contact the fire district prior
to any plans for development being submitted to Weld
County Planning Department ,
2. All proposed changes in occupancy to a structure to
be coordinated with the fire district ,
3 . Structures to be protected by automatic sprinkler
systems and standpipe systems ,
4 . Restrictions of occupancy to ordinary hazard and
below,
5 .' Building height to be limited to 35 feet or three
stories ,
6. Building construction types be limited to type
1-FR , type 11-FR , 11 one hour , and type 111 -one hour ,
7 . Floor area limitations to the requirements of the 1985
Uniform Building Code Table 5-C.
Some of these restrictions are based upon the type of
occupancy presently anticipated and could vary depending on
individual occupancies in the development . Feel free to _
• contact us again whenever you have comments or questions . 0 !�,L••rll
\.._ • Sincerely, :III 991986
\%1'i Co. Planning Con
William R . Emerson
•
•
; ;(JIy(,b
Er.„`` -•" �9 WE-87-0001
Ne40
RICHARD D.LAMM i �;`O TyT 'k JOHN W.ROL(
GOVERNOR t * DIRECTOR
x 1876
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET
' DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303) 866-2611
August 13, 1986
Gloria V. Dunn
Weld County Dept. of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Ms. Dunn:
RE: WILMAR SUBDIVISION
We have reviewed the geologic factors related to this proposed subdivision and
find the following:
1 . General soil conditions should be suitable for the intended purpose.
2. Soils are not suitable for standard septic leach fields. All
percolation rates are near or above the acceptable level . Engineered
systems may be used, but if the intended use is an industrial park
and if other than standard household wastes may be coming from these
•
industries, then we recommend a public system be required.
3. Drainage across the NW corner of Lot 1 , Block 2, needs to be
investigated.
4. The potential for mine subsidence has been addressed in the ATEC
Report #41-64012. We concur with their methods, results and
recommendations. It should be noted that on the boring location plan
that pillars 9 and 11 were not properly marked per the Explanation
and this should be corrected.
This site is suitable for the proposed use if a waste system is installed that
precludes the use of leach fields.
If you have any questions, please call .
Sincerely,
adwig, Chief
Minerals Fuels Section
bcr:LRL-87-014 ,- 2? ' ?986
a^
3190/7 'x.
GEOLOGY
STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE Weld Cu. Plum L'nmlalssio'
n_A
•
11.
•
�•
/� o WE-87-0001
RICHARD D. LAMM * '(;,.. U t JOHN W.BOLD
GOVERNOR we K' DIRECTOR
/876
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET
' DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611
August 15, 1986
Gloria V. Dunn
Weld County Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Sirs:
RE: WILMAR SUBDIVISION
As a follow-up on this subdivision, please note.
It is important to note that there is an increasing awareness among the public
that radon, a radioactive gas, occurs in Colorado at levels above the national
average and that this gas is hazardous to their health.
The sediments that overlie the bedrock, as well as the bedrock at this site,
have not actually been tested to determine their radon content, if any. We
would advise that this potential problem be addressed.
If you have any questions, please call .
Sincerely,
fria
L. R. Ladwig, Chief
Minerals Fuels Section
bcr:LRL-87-020
319 /1
3190/15
;WC; 18 1986
GEOLOGY
STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE Weld b. Plannlnt I;UIIIIQIISSIOIi
0711
. Em RA UAtt.;
To Planning Department Date August 15, 1986
COLORADO• From Wes Potter, Director, Health Protection Services /dam (]
26q
subject: S-241:86:9
The site has clay base soils with a percolation rate of 40 to 480 minutes per
inch. Section 6. 1 C of the Weld County Individual Septic Disposal System
Regulations restricts the number of evapotranspiration systems in a new sub
division to no greater than 25%.
Therefore, due to the extensive size possibly required by industrial sewage
disposal systems and the restriction of a suitable soil this division does not
recommend for approval of this proposed sub division.
By Direction of Ralph R. Wooley, M.D. , Director, Weld County Health Department
i AUG 15 1986
Weld Cu. PIanaice Cnmmissjon
DEPAR11tlEvNT OF PLANNING SERVICE
s g PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.44
�^ { S - 915 10th STRE'
girill
�lc 17;if 1 GREELEY.COLORADO 806
asilR
r,: -� TO
; '4‘.� ;tom
'F
L± !
COLORADO
CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986 gy pLK'-
Pa
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision —
preliminary plan. The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted prior to
3. Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: Agency: Date: 7. Dt C• Bco 1Gloria V. Dunn
Cu�yren Planner
;21
tOtcrstva
EMeRAnDum
Gloria V. Dunn --'
To Current Planner DateJuly 25, 1986
COLORADO From Donald R. Carroll , Administrative Manager - Engineering Dept.
Martin and Wilma J. Oase for subdivision - S-264:86:9
Subject'
We have reviewed the preliminary plan and have no problems .
In the final plat we would like the following items addressed:
1. The internal road cross section - is it going to be paved,
gravel with shoulders , or borrow pit ditches with culverts
at all accesses.
2. Applicant needs to address the access roads - upgrades
leading to the property for upgrading and dust control
with a road maintenance agreement.
3. Culvert size 15" C.M.P. Min. at all accesses.
4. Water line out of roadway. Relocate to borrow pit or shoulder
area. Taps to each lot.
5. Paving is required for public street.
6. A "Master Drainage Plan" that addresses retention will be
required. Subsequent site plans that handle drainage in
accordance with the "Master Plan" will be required for
individual lots .
DRC/bf
grRiVir
nv 1980
Weld Cu. 9Ianntit ZudhtmSsiOI
)�t1
• DEPART AT OF PLANNING SERVICES
. ,F
• 3 ? i v : . PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
11
3 t C) 915 10th STREET
('t
0 .11� GREELEY,COLORADO 30031
•
..:;-. :1
i ?y,
s :1
4 i
1,2 L T i v 4 , •
COLORADO CASE NU24BER 5-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
•
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma J. Oase for a Subdivision —
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the N} NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but
wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendatibn. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
`
J 1. � We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
` interests.'
2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
emitted prior to
3. P e refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: , ' , y, ,F Agency: 0)O)(1 iM.7 O D It r) —
nn aiL 311986
Gloria V. Dunn Weld Cu. Planning Cu01(IIZIOb
Curren Planner L f
�/There Ln nev vo v ul t k&wOt Av,T t, pot4 t��yl t atn:k,-0! I-4 to de,e) vvG tt-
vi„ t-.CV,uw1 M:0. a-a ells&,-inoCI L•tlevv� . ,/� I'l� J �r aft
N. r OJ(31i1 r a.:_,., .•
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERV'CE5
(12 •
PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT. 44C
t 915 101h ST NEE
ifis t
i GREELEY,COLORADO 006:
Mi ' �r _ Aii1'.
sa
ss s`)y' ' l
••
COLORADO CASE NUMBER S-264:86:9
July 21, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: •
Enclosed is an application from Martin and Wilma S. Oase for a Subdivision —
preliminary plan The parcel of land is described as the Ni NE} of Section
11, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the
parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is .
approximately .75 mile west of Dacono, south of Weld County Road 12, and
west of Weld County Road 11. .
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of
mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your
office. If you are unable to respond within fourteen (14) days (but wish to
do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
Please reply by August 11, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation.
1.. XX We have reviewed this request and find that the request
does (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons. Well planned usage of land and
within guidelines of County ordinance and our compre-
hensive plan .
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons:
3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
•
4. Please refer o the enclosed letter.
•
Signed Agency: Tri -Area Planning Commission
Secretary
Date: Au ust 6 , 1986
Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter.
Clor a . Dunn AUG 0% 1986
. Curr n' Planner
Weld Co. Planning Commission
pi,-,- 7 7r
41111
-4) , 77K
K
•
AUG oc199-- . j
�
FILING NUMBER: S-264:6. LI DATE OF INSPECTION: cc— V— rg
NAME: Martin and Wilma J. 1P s:9. Pinning P&?m)Iflf;lty
REQUEST: Subdivision - Preliminary Plan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N1 NNk of Section 11, T1N, R68W of the Gth P.M. , Weld County
LAND USE: N ,l.rer� -
E ; lei[B,-- Cm, .Cstol4Ve. --
"7 ZONING: N �
ci
LOCATION: Approximately .75 mile west of E
Dacono; south of Weld County Road 12 and west S O,c� euQ -A-4--
o' fi •
of Weld County Road 11 W
COMMENTS:
4-I _.._. ,_
•
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
August 12, 1986
S. M. Ruptash
Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.
500 Coffman St. , Suite 107
Longmont, CO 80501
RE: Water Service
Dear Ms. Ruptash:
This letter is in response to your request for water service
to serve the Following described property :
N1 NE.1 Sec 11, TIN, R68W, Weld County, Colorado.
Water service can be made available to the above
described property provided all requirements of the District
are satisfied , including easements where required for District
facilities .
Central Weld County Water District requires that contracts
be consumated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this
letter , or this letter shall become null and void unless •
extended in writing by the District .
Very truly yours ,
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
5921:—.9
Dale D. 0lhausen
Secretary - Manager
000/caa O E�EIVE
AUG 141986
Weld to. Planning Commission
pc' oin
2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • (303) 352.1284 • Dale D.Olhausen,Manager
•
•
•
•
Cerpc:ahon •
August 12, 1986
Molly Sommerville
Staff Attorney
' Weld County Board of
County Commissioners
915 - 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
✓Weld County Planning Commission
915 - 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Re: Case No. S-264 : 86 :9
Martin and Wilma J. Oase: Applicants
Subdivision-Preliminary Plan
Township 1 North, Range 68 West
Section 11: N/2NE/4
Ladies and Gentlemen :
Champlin Petroleum Company owns the oil and gas
which underlies the N/2NE/4 of Section 11 , Township 1
North, Range 68 West, Weld County, Colorado, which is
the subject of the above-referenced application for a
subdivision preliminary plan. I note further that
Champlin currently has two wells which are located on
the property which is the subject of the application.
I understand from a telephone conversation on
August 12 , 1986, with Gloria V. Dunn, Planner for the
Weld County Department of Planning Services, that the
acreage which is the subject of the application includes
approximately 80 acres and is currently zoned 1-3
( Industrial) . As you are probably aware, the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance provides in Section 34 . 4 . 2 .7
that oil and gas production facilities are a use by
right within the I-3 district.
In my telephone conversation with the applicant,
Mr. Martin Oase, I have determined that the applicants
do not intend to interfere with Champlin' s rights to
produce oil and gas which is located on the property and
that they have provided in their preliminary plan for
Champlin to have access to its drillsites and production
•
Weld County Board of County Commisioners
Weld County Planning Commission
Ausust 12 , 1986
Page 2
facilities . Representatives from Champlin have met with
a consultant for the applicants and they have determined
that the access routes and easements which are included
in the preliminary plan are acceptable to Champlin.
In that the applicants have agreed that they will
not interfere with oil and gas operations or production
facilities on the property, it appears that Champlin ' s
rights to develop its oil and gas will not be substan-
tially affected by the approval of the preliminary plan
for the subdivision, and, therefore, Champlin does not
• object to the application. I wish to note, however ,
that the oil and gas estate is the dominant estate and
that Champlin wishes to preserve all the rights that it
has to drill for oil and gas and to produce the oil and
gas which is located under the acreage in accordance
with government rules and regulations .
Very truly yours,
/ 14 rrna—
Molly Sommerville
MS: jaj
cc: W. D. Lancaster
T. W. Lindquist
R. M. Moss
Dave Brody - Amoco
Rocky Mountain Consultants
Martin Oase
o ECEIVE
G 191986
veld to.Planning tomflission
pc' err
44'
•
Empire Laboratories, Inc. P.O.Box 503 • (303)484-0359
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 8 MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes • Fort Collins,Colorado 80522
October 7, 1986
Rocky Mtn. Consultants
500 Coffman, Suite #107
Longmont, CO 80501
Attention: Mrs. Jennifer Rodriguez
Re: Wilmar Subdivision
Weld County, Colorado
Gentlemen:
Our firm has performed a total of twenty-five (25) percolation tests and
twenty-one (2.1) exploratory borings at the above-referenced subdivision.
The percolation tests were performed on June 7, August 28 and October G,
1986. The exploratory borings were drilled to depths of eight (8) to nine
(9) feet and the percolation holes were drilled to depths of two and one-
half (2}) feet. Percolation tests were performed in the field after a twenty-
four (24) hour soak period. The purpose of this investigation was to
determine the suitability of this proposed subdivision for individual septic
systems. The purpose of the percolation tests on October G, 1986 was to
define areas within the confines of revised lots which are suitable for
standard septic systems. Our last investigation concentrated on the west
half of the subdivision where some high percolation rates were recorded in
previous investigations.
The total number of lots in this subdivision has been reduced from sixteen
( 16) to thirteen ( 13) since our original investigation to help assure meeting
the Weld County requirement of no more than twenty-five percent (25%)
evapotranspiration systems in new subdivisions. It is our understanding
that two (2) lots in this subdivision already have standard septic systems.
The soil conditions at this site consists basically of approximately six (G)
inches of clayey topsoil overlying sandy silty clay with occasional layers of
silty sand. Claystone or sandstone bedrock was encountered in several
borings at depths ranging from six and one-half (6+) to eight and one-half
(8₹) feet below the ground surface. No subsurface groundwater was
encountered at the time of our investigation to a depth of eight (8) feet.
However, water levels could fluctuate on this site due to seasonal variations
and irrigation demands. Please refer to the enclosed boring logs for a more
accurate description of the soil conditions.
00 R A to
'"`°'
•r ,'°,44. Branch Offices "
P.O.Box 1135 P.O.Box 1744 P.O.Box 10076
'fc 2 Longmont,Colorado 80502 Greeley,Colorado 80632
•O (303)776-3921 (303)351.0460 Cheyenne,Wyoming 8200:
(307)632.9224
Member of Consulting Engineers Council
Rocky Mtn. Consultants
October 7, 1986
Page 2
Percolation rates ranging from ten (10) to four hundred and eighty (480)
minutes per inch were recorded on this site. It is our opinion that an
engineered evapotranspiration septic system will be required on Lot 1 Block 1
of this subdivision. We feel that areas large enough for supporting standard
septic systems can be located on the remaining lots with proper planning.
An additional two (2) lots in this subdivision can use evapotranspiration
septic systems and the subdivision will still meet the County regulation of
no more than twenty-five percent (25%) evapotranspiration systems for new
subdivisions. It is our opinion that the leachate from standard systems on
this site will basically flow downward to the bedrock before flowing laterally.
Due to the depth of the bedrock 'stratum on this site, we would not anticipate
seepage problems of the leachate from septic systems at the surface, providir
no seepage beds are placed on slopes greater than eight percent (8%) . It
is suggested that industry with low water usage be planned for lots where
evapotranspiration systems are anticipated.
Additional percolation tests will be required on each lot prior to construction
for the purpose of designing septic systems. Proper planning of building
and parking configurations to allow for locating leach fields in areas of
permeable soil will be advantageous from a standpoint of minimizing costs
of septic systems, reducing the area required for leach fields and assuring
conformance with County regulations.
Enclosed please find our test boring location plan, log of borings, key to
borings and summary of percolation tests.
We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. Please contac
us if you have any questions regarding these results.
Very truly yours,
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
�,alsreoaari.,r
cot veld 1G°� FtDJ. r .,
V O Jro %9 TEd? '
Edward .1. Paas, P.E. ro�G S'.
Longmont Branch Manager f 15776 =
Colorado Registration #15776 s t 00
/pjk
• •
TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN
SCALE I"- 3OO'
-- _•
•
•
I I
' A4.22 24
- -Mo./B
.
aB
2./9 N0.5 N0.17 NO. 9 NO.6
./✓ sl6? NO.11 e9— ;
/la oei) s
425
NOB. O
N0.10 N0.7 S
(0.16
N0.3
N
No.IS
S No.h
EXIST/NG
RESIDENCE AND
OUT BUILb1NGS
5 —DEGP BOA;Nc
ANA PEaC. TEST
Na )2
5 N0.IA•
4
NO. 1 N0.2
NO.13
„'9>
CMTy. RD. *11 GUD D[ lie n Q_ 1
• KEY TO BORING LOGS
•
:It �� TOPSOIL �•�� GRAVEL
FILL •
'•`�.• SAND & GRAVEL
SILT •i• SILTY SAND &GRAVEL
/ / 'de,e
r/A CLAYEY SILT RJ1 COBBLES
SANDY SILT �p
./ .� SAND,GRAVEL& COBBLES
CLAY WEATHERED BEDROCK
I
SILTY CLAY _ SILTSTONE BEDROCK
SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK
SAND SANDSTONE BEDROCK
�•,�• SILTY SAND �� LIMESTONE
i. 4 usi
CLAYEY SAND "" "
t.e GRANITE
•N
�•� SANDY SILTY CLAY
' SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE
STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER
v WATER TABLE 24 hours AFTER DRILLING
HOLE CAVED
5/12 Indicates that 5 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 Inches was required to penetrate 12 Inches.
rMrinr I AnnnATnnfr' iur 4-00
• LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTN NO, 1 NO. 2 NO. i N0.1•
•
./;-: ,v. / - 1/7777.
/ 77.e . // /77/
-/ / �/2• l /Z /vy
1O •
•
N0. 5 .NO. G x10.7
o
/✓/✓ //✓/ / ✓/✓
Y j •
/r/ • ;.7 i j A7
7-11 / X.
Ch 94 6%, 47". ...."1.
/1.42. 1: : •
/O
inn
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. .. .
/YG
• •
• LOG OF BORINGS
0CPTII
No. 8 NO.9 NO. 10 NO. II
:4•< './ /
7 /
5
/ 7/ . -
37/12 �• - 50/6 4/12 4/l 44/1 -1-=
10
N012 NO. 13 NO. 14 No. 15
0
r/v, /v . /✓/r 7r .
;Zi . • ;_ • /.
/. /: / i •
5 ' /• / / / •
f / /
/ /
• 10/12 7/12 =77 27/12 4-1- 50/8 fll
10
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH NO. IG NO. 17
0 1///J /✓/✓ .
// F /'
5 •
50/9 . 13/12 -1 "
10
or
EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC.
• •
LOG OF BORINGS
DEPTH do.id #4/9 th.20 .42/.
0
/ • / .
5 � • ' f
10 50/6 ----
DEPTH ,✓O.ZZ 1%fl ,424 ,h.25
•
0
f .
5
6/12 4.•. 50/11
10
spa
_.. FAADIDC I♦ ine ATneiet u�r
SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TESTS
Percolation Rate
Boring Number Location Minutes Per Inch
6/7/86 1 • Loft 8 Block 2 40
2 Lot 7 Block l 45
3 Lot 6 Block 2 480
4 Lot 4 Block 1 480
5 Lot 4 Block 2 240
6 Lot 2 Block 2 60
7 Lot 2 Block 1. 40
8/28/86 8 Lot 1 Block 1 240
9 Lot 3 Block 2 40
10 Lot 3 Block 1 52 •
11 .Lot 5 Block 2 90
12 Lot 7 Block 2 45
13 Lot 8 Block 1 45
14 Lot 6 Block 1 45
*15, Lot 4 Block .1 20
*16 Lot 6 Block 2 10
*17 Lot 4 Block 2 40
•
10/6/86 *18 Lot 3 Block 1 24
*19 Lot 5 Block 2 24
*20 Lot 5 Block 2 24
*21 Lot 5 Block 2 Exploratory Hole
*22 Lot 4 Block 2 • . 20
*23 • Lot 4 Block 2 30
*24 Lot 4 Block 2 30
*25. Lot .3 Block 1 20
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*Retested in Different Area Within Lot.
•
•
r3
• •
STATE OF COLORADO ) BEFORE THE BOARD
ss. OF DIRECTORS OF THE
COUNTY OF WELD ) DACONO SANITATION DISTRICT
PETITION FOR INCLUSION
1. Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase are fee owners of one hundred percent
of the following described real property which is, or will be in a rea-
sonable time, capable of being served by the Dacono Sanitation District.
2. The legal description of the property sought to be included under
this Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase assent to the inclusion of the above-
described property into the Dacono Sanitation District and pray that the
Board of Directors of said District grant this Petition after public
notice and hearing as provided by law.
Martin Oase
Wilma J. Oase
Address: 4784 Weld County Road 12
Erie, Colorado 80516
Telephone: 654-0867
The foregoing Petition for Inclusion was acknowledged before me this
day of , 198 by
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
'Notary Public
SDF:bs
SDFD
111886
• •
•
AGREEMENT AND COVENANT REGARDING SEWER SERVICES
1. PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are MARTIN OASE and WILMA J.
OASE (hereinafter referred to as "the Oases") , and the COUNTY OF WELD,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (hereinafter referred to as "County") .
2. RECITALS AND PURPOSES. The Oases own the real property described in
paragraph 3 below, and desire to develop such in accordance with Weld
County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. In the absence of services
provided by a sanitation district, the Oases propose that sanitation
needs be met by the installation of individual septic systems. The
County recognizes that sanitation district service, while desirable, is
not available at this time, but the parties agree that to protect the
public health, the Oases shall , within ten days of final plat approval ,
petition for annexation to the Dacono Sanitation District and the
individual systems shall be abandoned in favor of sanitation district
service as soon as such service becomes available. The purpose of this
Agreement is to set forth the terms of that agreement.
3. REAL PROPERTY. The property that is the subject of this Agreement
is legally described as follows:
WILMAR SUBDIVISION,
N-1/2 of NE-1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 68 West,
Weld County, Colorado.
4. OASES' AGREEMENTS.
4.1 The Oases agree to submit a petition for inclusion into the
Dacono Sanitation District within ten days of the final plat
approval . In addition, the Final Plat shall not be recorded until
such petition is submitted.
4.2 The Oases agree that when the lines of a sanitary sewer system,
which is capable of serving the needs of the property, come within
400 feet of the boundaries of the property, the property shall be
connected to said lines, concurrently abandoning forever the
individual septic systems in place. For the purposes of Section
32-1-1004(1)(a), C.R.S. , the parties acknowledge that this require-
ment is necessary for the protection of public health. Further, the
Oases acknowledge that although this statute requiring connection
applies only to special districts, this commitment to abandon and to
connect to a sewer system, is made regardless of the governmental
entity that is operating the sewer system. The parties acknowledge
that the duties hereunder require coordination and planning.
Affirmative steps to connect to a sewer system must be made within
20 days of a notice given by the sanitation system that the lines
are within 400 feet. Affirmative steps include, but are not limited
to, the purchase of taps, engineering and other planning work.
7e)
Ch
•
5. ENFORCEMENT. The parties agree that breach of this Agreement shall
cause damage that cannot be adequately determined and addressed by
monetary recompense; therefore, it is expressly agreed that this
Agreement shall be specifically enforceable in a court of law or equity
by injunctive or other equitable relief.
6. COSTS. Any owner of any lot or parcel of land in the Wilmar
Subdivision shall be responsible for the tap fees and construction costs
for connecting his or her lot or parcel to the sewer lines. In addition,
should main lines be laid throughout the subdivision, such that individ-
ual owners may connect to them, the owners of each lot shall share
equally the expense thereof. The Oases shall only bear the costs for the
land still owned by them.
7. BINDING EFFECT - COYENANT RUNNING WITH LAND. This Agreement shall
inure to to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties, and their
respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Oases intend
to sell and convey the individual lots in the development and this
Agreement constitutes a covenant running with land, binding all subse-
quent purchasers. A copy of the Agreement shall be recorded in the
records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
8. NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all
purposes if sent by certified or registered mail , postage and fees
prepaid, addressed to the party to whom such notice is intended to be
given at the address set forth on the signature page below, or at such
other address as has been previously furnished in writing to the other
party or parties. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when
deposited in the U.S. Mail .
9. DELAYS. Any delays in , or failure of, performance by any party of
his or its obligations under this Agreement shall be excused if such
delays or failure are a result of acts of God, fires, floods, strikes,
labor disputes, accidents, regulations or orders of civil or military
authorities, shortages of labor or materials, or other causes, similar or
dissimilar, which are beyond the control of such party.
10. PARAGRAPH CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs are set forth
only for convenience and reference, and are not intended in any way to
define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of this Agreement.
11. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OR ACTION. The parties agree to execute any
additional documents and to take any additional action necessary to carry
out this Agreement.
12. INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT. This Agreement represents the entire
agreement between the parties and there are no oral or collateral
agreements or understandings. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing signed by the parties. If any provision of this
2
• •
Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, no other provision shall be
affected by such holding, and all of the remaining provisions of this
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
13. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by any party to this Agreement of a
breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be
construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by any party.
14. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
Colorado.
DATED: , 1986.
Martin Oase
Wilma J. Oase
COUNTY OF WELD, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
By
Title
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 198 by Martin Oase and Wilma J. Oase.
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
Notary Public
3
51
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
198 by as
of the County of Weld, Department
of Health.
Witness my hand and official seal .
My commission expires:
Notary Public
SDF:bs
AGMT3
111486
111886(a)
rlarfr
5S
•
RESOLUTION
RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT) TO I-3
(INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) FOR MARTIN AND WILMA OASE
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 1st day of Sept-
ember, 1982 , at 2 : 00 o' clock p.m. for the purpose of hearing
the application of Martin and Wilma Oase, 4784 Weld County Road
12 , Erie, Colorado 80516, requesting a Change of Zone from
A (Agricultural District) to I-3 (Industrial District) for a
parcel of land located in the N'NE4 of Section 11, Township 1
North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" , attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and
WHEREAS, Section 21. 6. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners heard all the
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the re-
quest of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld
County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed finds
as follows:
1. The applicant has complied with Section 21. 7 et. seq.
of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance regarding the
application requirements for a change of zone.
2. The request is in conformance with Section 21. 5. 1.1
of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows :
a) It is the opinion of the Weld County Board of County
Commissioners that the proposed zone change is con-
sistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan,
and the proposed district will be compatible with
the existing surrounding land uses and future de-
velopment. The subject site is located in the
Tri-Area Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan
Areas . The Tri-Area Planning Commission is
recommending approval of the request and identifies
the subject site for future industrial land use.
b) Weld County Road 12 will. provide adequate access
to the site.
c) The proposed rezoning would not interfere with ex-
traction of any known commercial mineral deposits.
411,
Page 2
RE: COZ — MARTIN AND WILMA O?
d) Soil conditions do not present limitations to the
construction of structures on the site.
e) The proposed sewer system has been determined
adequate.
f) Water will be made available to the site by North
Central Weld.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the application of
Martin and Wilma Oase, for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural
District) to I-3 (Industrial District) on the above referenced
parcel of land be, and hereby is granted subject to the following
conditions: 1) A geological hazard survey permit is required for
any portions of the property which are within the potential sub-
sidence areas before any building permits are issued or before
any toxic materials are stored on the property; 2) Prior to the
issuance of building permits, the applicants shall contact the
Longmont Fire Protection District to insure an adequate water
supply is available for fire protection.
The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by ,the following vote on the 1st day of
September, A.D. , 1982.
‘71 .... :LyV,t .^ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: �, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder n. „ 77 2.2/20.,/,,ei
and Clerk to the Board JOn �C
Martin,, airmaan
BY" C;?7/) 0---,4_r. e < _-4rm NAY
Deputy County Clerk buck Carlson, Prro-Tem f
APPROVED AS TO FORM: C .
Norman Carlson
, v �r.r( lam'1 XL 62/.�/
County Attorney . f. Kirby /
ie K. Steinmark
SEP 9 1982
Vdd Co. Planning Commission
DATE PRESENTED: September 8, 1982
File contains
oversized map
Please see original file
Hello