The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About850086.tiff RESOLUTION RE: DENY CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (R-1 , R-4 , C-3 , AGRICULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL USES) FOR GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 22nd day of May, 1985 , at 2 : 00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Greater Hudson Development Company, c/o Lee Murata, 13877 Highway 52 , Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 , requesting a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1 , R-4 , C-3 , Agricultural and Recreational Uses) for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: Parts of Sections 33 and 34 , Township 2 North, and Parts of Sections 2 and 3 , Township 1 North, all in Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Section 28 . 4 . 1 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be denied for the following reasons: 1 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that this request complies with Section 28 .4 . 1 . 2 et. seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows : A. The request for a Change of Zone is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. B. That the uses which will be allowed under the proposed Planned Unit Development plan will conform to the performance standards of the Planned Unit Development District. C. That the uses which would be allowed on the subject property by granting the Change of Zone will be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by zoning and with the oac 850086 l Page 2 RE: DENY COZ - GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY future development as projected by the plans of affected municipalities. D. That adequate water and sewer service can be made available to serve the site. E. That street or highway facilities can adequately provide access to the property to meet the requirements of the proposed zoned district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Greater Hudson Development Company for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1 , R-4 , C-3 , Agricultural and Recreational Uses) on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, denied. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 22nd day of May, A.D. , 1985. el 4 $�V BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: •-fi WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder y�Q \ _ and Clerk to the Board ac u ine Jo 'n•on, Chairman B - Gene . Bran ner, Pr em D puty County Cl k EXCUSED APPROVED A TO FORM: C.W. Ki VVVV G d' Lac County Attorney Frank am c i HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 85-19 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE, AGRICULTURAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (R-1, R-4, C-3, AGRICULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL USES) — GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY A public hearing was conducted on May 22, 1985, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Chairman Commissioner Gene Brantner, Pro—Tem Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Excused Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated April 17, 1985, and duly published April 18, 1985, in the La Salle Leader, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Greater Hudson Development Company for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) . Chairman Johnson, noting that only four Commissioners were present, explained that if a tie vote should occur, the absent Commissioner would review the record and listen to the tapes of this hearing before casting the deciding vote. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Planning Department representative Rod Allison read the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial into the record. Lee Murata, representing Greater Hudson Development Company, came forward to explain the proposed project. Judith Hamilton, Geological Engineer, spoke about the water available for the proposed development. George Stieber, a retired soil conservationist, stated that this land is not suitable for farming, but is ideal for homes. Bob Wardell, of Lindsay Water Conditioning, spoke about the availability of individual water treatment systems. Mark Shannon, realtor representing Margaret Eichthaler, also spoke. (Let the record reflect that a short break was taken at this time.) Bob Gudka, RE 3-J Superintendent of Schools, spoke about the concerns of the school district. Susan Worth, mayor of Hudson, spoke about the problems the Town of Hudson had experienced in attempting to annex this property and submitted Exhibit F, a letter from a previous mayor of Hudson. Mary Swank spoke in opposition to this application, and Dewey Thompson, of the Hudson Sanitation District, spoke about the limitations of their existing system. Susan E. Burch, attorney for the Town of Hudson, also spoke in opposition to this application. Richard Brownlee, of Nautica Investments, gave further explanation concerning this application, stating that his company has contracted to purchase this property from the Greater Hudson Development Company. Following discussion, Page 2 RE: COZ — GREATER HUDSON Commissioner Brantner moved to deny the application of Greater Hudson Development Company for a Change of Zone, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission and stated that he felt none of the necessary criteria had been met. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lacy and carried unanimously. APPROVED: `� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: (2.(cLy.y WELD COUNTY, COLORADO \ Weld County Clerk and Recorder ►vyV "' and Clerk to the Boa d �1 �e ie Sohn , Chairman ieputy County C1- k ene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem EXCUSED C.W. Kir /� -, C or E. ac Frank Yamag i TAPE #85-37 & #85-38 DOCKET #85-19 LHR 2240 ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY ' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : MAY 22, 1985 DOCKET # 85-18 - COZ, A to C-3, THEORDORE & MARE BURKHARDT DOCKET # 85-19 .. COZ, A to PUD, GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY DOCKET # PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the ROC # (as '___tad above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. —a_ NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING // ci4 `l/Vf>277toR` e -��sf�,�.,,a lvaq L/s"Auc� 6„ - ��t'Ar€4 ,d4,o©- 14---el -ear ., Red riles, A7.'�r+� ,--r1. �d,.4 c4.l2,t, if-f' g( 1� ,'Y7 L . JA, .i7s�a/ �tcke-4t t ile-461. 114-4, AL I thit r1. 1 '(:)(ILIAD! S: It.5EDo )+%h Ott k -1 q )• L C, (/ <rzr /At-�� 5 3 5 5 y2 #4.reWY DA-> b'r,,,-fcr• 4tio/si - k ✓_. ,2 - o ( ..-4_,c,,,), ilt,z tZi-e % 1/6-6-3 cz'2/Z (o 57//1710; -2c2 n ( m� , (2,41 1n ? r lip 4 1.10ifl lY/ ecnIpit y 1GI 4- %dry .c • •. sec CV/ £ CC'tr✓L 64 5. PffN"l/E� //�ve, 1 ,L��/Iio.,�G/� �Nedi�d/ ff��t.i or.v- 11�ic-a'� 77Le¢- 1 0-6 _3,raf U, di»Y7 4 �'is, J+"-j r,;142,n2✓i;Jas D :. Al Le O-3 . z4, r- /1 d y• OIv ri. C ,, > c " 2. ( ,.r C y � )757‘ 1a,�u4 s oto° ,` (j;,..wz,-; //„...„4.0.-,„ 77J ,ti 7J)(LSi /7576 ° Ci-pr J2 r, 1,i_ 'mss. f?c /A4 ,� 13 h'2 ) tic)? s/iJ �1J4 y%'t aL`�) 4� �'o lie e.--6e-- 474/,'2--. 4 tC 71 7( arl I xN28r j ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY ' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : DOCKET # DOCKET # DOCKET # PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOC n (as ii:ted above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING IL4P de/ZIP; Lrdil2wf f&4 /t? ,&r1 --,i 4 ectsee---Z-- //' 9-- .31(17$� • C7 �7 tc � k 3E s- r kte , s6 << ,S rc < c 1/ 45a, ,. 1). /R 71419 6 siy NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State _of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be meld in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time -specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a _certified court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the -Board's Office can be contacted for a list of certified court reporters in the area. If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 85-19 Greater Hudson Development Company c/o Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 DATE: May 22, 1985 TIME: 2:00 P.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) _LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parts of Sections 33 and 34, Township 2 North, and Parts of Sections 2 and 3, Township 1 North, all in Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: April 17, 1985 PUBLISHED: April 18, 1985, in the La Salle Leader 6115. 1,..", PUBLIC NOTICES Alison G i bbs ,,, , Your hlght to r,„J_-, in,v 'S;,rt d,A-- !La,. 11 •l. I. „a , hail,— rrt' tie ?<EJ,',I,, S Sl C SI_N. a „ ,, , i , 1 ' rub. xed alai NOTICE t n Karla-Milt , .4{1,I r'<U LT.) „•�„ ,a ,< Pursuant to the zoning laws of the-State of al <l,<„ �� " » +� 1 �� > Color-ado _and the Meld County Zoning heel, aal,Lai Ralz , : on- Odrinance, a public hearing will beheld in t.aly ,orris u there. -the chambers of the Board of County 'r tie . of at ' `r r " Commissioners of Weld County, C 0, u ,[rv', rr,Kl prix.:- to ' Ti 't rib , i ua i t( aurae ,< s ),'. : 2Waeld Count/y �Centennial Center, 91 ' r .1,..1,! n, , 1„ ,t, I , ,el i•,per ».Street,Tisa.f.loo nwaeguxottadt , tLc lu wn, . .r h t n. the time specified. fl 5d ,,, ,1 ;. r,tlely o: tIl S r ct ] : ,0, ' ul In 1,,t r c a- manner interested in the following pm I r i ,,, p, . , , ,„ ,,. ,Intl posed change of Zone are reguesfed �», and , n n attend and may be heard. _,� r� ' n, <<r4ee a ,1, Should the applicant or lay interested -' , , <,,, -day] i< 'arty desire the presence of certified court reporter to make m record of the. n I•H.f. eeedings, in addition to the taped rggedord I which le k to the be Officee-caan be acoontacted �:, for a list ofcertified court reporters in the area. If a wart reporter is obtained, the r, , r lib' , n n < . ,. , . of such actioneat leastt fivedays'p iroior advised oithe 9t1` hearing. -The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting $5 BE IT ALSO if NOWN that the text and maps so certified by -the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in /' the office of the Clerk to the Board of ct 0! it Bounfy Commissioners,n elocated �9 510tthe Street Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. Greater Hudson DeveloprrentpConant IC#Nt ciatee Nyrtatti -Fort L upton Colorado&621 .thDOCKET No 85-19 /0 Maly DATE: May 22, 1985 1IME'2:00 p.m. REQUEST: ChangeofZonefromA iaiF $51 Rural to Planned-0 Development-riRecreational �a.�a R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreatana) Uses) el, nn Expires April 4. 1997 LEGA L DESCRIPTION: Yartsof Sections -534u Su. vuebec St. _Sections42 and 3S liownshi North, and Parts in Englewood, Colorado °x111 itange 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld Bounty, Colorado. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 33Y: MARY ANNFEU1RSTEIN 1( COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER °°•' °•• AND CLERK TO THE BOARD aft BY: MARY REIFF,DEPUTY ;s TBWEE 4 ANN DATED: April 11, 1985 1 ublished in the Kane Yal •, yp May9, rt ci o HAVES m 985• ^o - �4%r,1., *@�pp� DATE: April 17 , 1985 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 22nd day of May, 1985 , at 2 :00 P.M. Docket No. B5-19 - Greater Hudson Development Company, COZ- Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1 , I2-4 , C-3 , Agricultural and Recreational Uses) OFFICE OF THE C/LE TO THE BOARD BY: n?� Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ��'.. 1 Ja N O T l C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld _County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time _specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may 8e heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a certified court reporter to make e record of the -proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the -Board's Office can be contacted for a list of certified court reporters in the area. If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter -shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so _certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 85-19 Greater Hudson Development Company c/o Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 DATE: May 22, 1985 TIME: 2:00 P.M. REQUEST: Change iof Zone _from agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parts of Sections 33 and 34, T-ownship 2 North, and Parts of Sections 2 and 3, Township 1 North, all in Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, JJeputy DATED: April 17, 1985 PUBLISHED: April 18, 1-985, in the La Salle Leader LoY/B/ T (f/ i r-C/2tct . L /t tit // TaR E EY, COW. 1 /` Z, ri<f/ 1/ l` ii Di } Lf / -,� c / WM/« �j c {I„yy /� (� l.F_— Cf.Zo-./' L{�,/�<� _ /mil c��(�tj'tr 1.�1----4:74 il,' 7 -�r-62,eI -� I� --tZi -- - f£1 �--t ---fre, G/ re Ci .t c i F��J(�/7/�c2 e_ , lL.v < ((.P�-i'Ce C�'l-ri 0y/`Zl/<?— (, 2, a 'V- T., /A 2 / --- tf/7//o� . / Summary of the Weld County Planning Commissicn Meeting April 7, 1025 Page 3 CASE IThl.FFR : 418:85:4 APPLCIANT: Greater Hudson Deveioprent Company pFQt'FST: P Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Urit Pevelopment (P.-1 , P-4, C-3, Agricultural and P.ecreation.a'j Uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Sections 33 and 34. T717 and parts of Sections 2 and 3, TIN, all in R65W of the 6th P.Y. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: AdTncent and north of Hudson town , _nits; north of State Highway 52 and T-75, east of Weld County Pod 41. APPEARANCE: lee Wurata represented Greater hudson Development Company, Yr. Murata stated they are trying to obtain a change of none on this property from agricultural to planned unit development . There ore six farmers from the area who compose the development group. He explained their plans for the Planned Unit Development and the difficulties they have had obtaining a license from the Colorado Facing Commission to organize Colorado harness raceways, Inc. Tape 197 - Side 2 The Chairman asked Mike Mullen to read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff, which are for denial, into the record. Mr. Murata explained housing planned for this area would he manufactured homes, not mobile homes, and would be in the seventy thousand dollar range. Fe explained the difficulties they have had with the town of Hudson concerning probable annexation and public utilities. Lee Morrison explained that the burden of proof is on the applicant. If he wishes to call anyone forwarded to back him up or clarify why this change of zone should be granted he should do so. Rob Wendel, Lindsey Soft Water Service, explained their plans to purify the water in this development. Judith L. Hamilton, Consulting Groundwater Geologist and Consulting Engineer, explained their plans for domestic well water for the development and their plans to keeps the nitrates at a safe level. Tape 19R - Side 1 .;,'; K' Summary of the Weld Ccun:y Planning Commission P:eeting Lpril 2, 19F5 Foie 4 Judith Hamilton also explained their water augmentation plan. ?'es Potter, Director, Environmental Fealth Services, Weld County health Pepartr,.ent , reported on the accumulation of methane gas in the water Yells This area . Fe stated methane gas is not a health hazard, but if not 1 . .perty vented, etc. , it can be explosive. The problem with individual rater purifiers is: what is the initial cost, what do they cost to operate, and does the average person have the expertise to operate the units? Pe also discussed nitrate levels in drinking water. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. Manual Montoya, Farmer' s Reservoir and Irrigation Company, reported the company is concerned with flood waters that ray run into the Beebe Canal. Also, no serious attempt has been made, by the developers, to work with them on the drainage. Doris Rebel , Adjacent property owner, wondered if the developers had enough money tc complete the project if this renuest were granted. Lee Korrison reported this can he asked at this point, but is not required. llefore the last stage, cr upon the Final Flat for the Planned Unit Development the developers would be asked to supply collateral to finish this development. Albert Sack, President, Farmer's Reservoir are Irrigation Company, stated it is not their intent to fight this proposal , but they need to be sure their ditches and rights are protected and the water is not contaminated by run—off. When too much black top is put into an area the water has to go somewhere and is usually contaminated by oil and other pollutants. Pod Sisson, Fudson Sanitation District , explained that they have a twenty year plan which was incorporated in 1972. This allows for a ten percent a year growth rate and at this time the Board does not feel they want to go into a sanitation district with the developers because of the lack of commitment for financial assurance. Yr. Sisson stated, "We are not against the development as long as we are not the developer." At the present time they could handle five hundred families, but in a development the size of the one proposed by the Greater Fudson Development Company it would take the sanitation district years to obtain the necessary approval and install the necessary plant facilities. Philip Rebel, adjacent property owner, asked to see the plat of the Greater Hudson Development Company. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission v:eeting April 2, 1985 Page 5 Susan Worth, Ycyor of Hudson , reported the annexation petition has never been completed by the developers nor has it been turned into the town Board. The town is opposed to this development because it is not compatible with `_heir comprehensive plan and it is their feeling this proposal would create two towns, one within another. They would like to work closely with the developers, but they have come to the town meetings unannounced and unprepared. They have also come to the Board of Trustee' s meetings, but not the meetings of the Planning Commission. If a gond working relatiorshin could be worked out they would like to annex the land first and then rezone it after it is incorporated into the tour . Susan F. Burch, Attorney, Town of Hudson, stated the proposed project would triple the population of the town of Fudson. So far, the applicant has rot presented good sound plans and projections that are concrete. Also, the town of Fudson could have problems with the tax structure if this were annexed. There have been no traffic studies, no valid water and sewer studies and no law enforcement plans. The town would like to work vith the developer, but to annex without concrete plans could cause a lot of problems. Robert Swank, area property owner, felt this proposal would make a lot tore people in the area and will take away the agricultural aspect of the area. Tape 198 - Side 2 Ellen Watson, area property owner, asked which quarter section of Section would be included in the Planned Unit Development plan. Mr. Murata presented fifty-ore signatures of neighbors, and businesses in the area that are in favor of this development. Susan Worth presented ninety-seven signatures from residents within the town of Hudson that are against this proposal. MOTION: Paulette Weaver moved Case Number 7-418:85:4 for the Greater Fudson :Development Company be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based upon the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff, the testimony heard by the members of the Planning Commission and that: Cumt'•ary of the. Veld Count' Planning Commission Meeting April 2, 1985 Page 6 The applicant has failed to demonstrate that this request complies with Section 26.4. 1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The request for a change of zone is consistent with the Weld Ccur.ty Comprehensive Plan; — That the uses which will be allowed urder the proposed Planned Unit Development plan will conform to the performance standards of. the Planned Unit Development District; - That the uses which would be allowed on the subject property by granting the change of acre will be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by zoning and with the future development as projected by the plans of affected municipalities; That adequate water and sewer service can be made available to serve the site; - That street or highway facilities can adequately provide access to the property to meet the requirements of the proposed zoned district. Motion seconded by Bill Nc1•'urray. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Pill McMurray — yes; Stephen Hamilton. — yes; Paulette Weaver — yes; Doug Graff — Yes, he would encourage the developer and the town of Fudson to renew their efforts in a spirit of cooperation to see if it is possible to annex this property into the town of Fudson. 'Having been involved in the developments within small communities on a number of occasions he understands many of the problems that 1`'.r. 1urata has probably experienced, but he can also understand where the town is coming from. It requires a lot of time, effort, and patience on the part of both the developer and the town. lie would really encourage the two to work together to see if an annexation can occur within the town of Fudson. Lydia Dunbar - yes; Jack Holman - Yes, and he agrees with the comments made by Doug Graff. Sharon Linhart - yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Summary of the Veld County Flarcing Commission Yeet'_r.g April 2, 1985 Page The meeting was adjourned at 3:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted , �. ol.a,-•x. Q,�oo Bobbie Coed Secretary rig/ 1(); OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356-4000, EXT. 4200 WI P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 O • COLORADO 1 C sY C-7"1.7775 �' April 8, 1985 `';_ L k 7' - Greater Hudson Development Company APR 2 1988 c/o Lee Murata i�i� d J 13877 Highway 52 —" Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: Your application for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as Parts of Sections 33 and 34, Township 2 North, and Parts of Section 2 and 3, Township 1 North, all in Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. Tin order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by April 30, 1985. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO b\vt.saAr---- IRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. I- -- f. .; ;;. OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS l‘ r PHONE(303)356-400O EXT_4200 P.O. BOX 753 p 7^r 1 1 ,ti GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 i 3 t , • COLORADO April 8, 1985 Greater Hudson Development Company c/o Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: Your application for a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as Parts of Sections 33 and 34, Township 2 North, and Parts of Section 2 and 3, Township 1 North, all in Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by April 30, 1985. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO a�a>t�r.�\aJUvra_ IRMAN a I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. I rat O f p1 7E' 100 ...wr..[ A � � U t 7i as. ,-. .F V 'P& Aar t �}. „ I L. }may! E3 O a wit l a a W a-1 N O s:" ' ,j1. g2 " 8 ro ru ¢ w a n, o MW z C stl U * 1,/ • U COL'w ( O a+ >.. s I're cr -- to, -0 s..i 3 a h : i-: I rs-,i i— 14O m .,A 4-) m 5E 'm W z o N 0J i-7rj, mForm 'kLLSI ' U U 1� -f d 3 .a i Ft' , yaLu' ice— R d'0S0 r z861 'Qad `00: , ° "i0e4F, «n..- ,.»�. At -In: 1 • °F.Ccp RICHARD D. LAMM "c/ _POIT p Governor m O. JERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer * .,876 * OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 �� y April S, 1985 h°I, 88 1985 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Weld County Planning Department Weld Co. Planning bam;mssinn 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Hudson Garden Village Rezoning Plat Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the above referenced application for a 1079-acre planned unit development. The proposed water supply is from tributary wells to be augmented by Laramie-Fox Hills wells. The applicants presently appear to have a decree for 140 acre-feet of non-tributary water in the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. The decree number is 79CW111. Judith Hamilton's January 17, 1985 letter on this proposal states the applicants must develop an augmentation plan for this development to replace tributary depletions. We agree with this statement and other recommendations in her letter. The applicants must apply for all the necessary well permits. The court will not consider the case until our office has acted on the well permits or six months from submittal has passed. While the general concept of the water supply plan may be feasible, we cannot recommend approval of the preliminary plan until the applicants have developed and filed an augmentation plan in the Water Court. We ask to see the development plan once the augmentation plan is signed by the water judge to assure the plan is adequate for the proposed development. The augmentation plan should designate an entity or association such as a homeowners associa- tion to be responsible for and ensure compliance with the terms of the plan. FRICO has applied in the Water Court for storage rights in the valley fill alluvium of Beebe Draw due to seepage from their reservoirs and canals. We have filed Statements of Opposition to these claims in Water Court. We are unsure whether the claims will affect this development. Irrigation water for the project is to be provided by the Henrylyn Ditch which currently serves the property. How many shares are available and what are their historic yield? The applicants should also obtain a legal opinion concerning the applicability of the ditch rights to be used for lawn irriga- tion. A plat note and covenants will be required to limit square footage of irrigation per lot. Mr. Michael Mullen Page 2 April 5, 1985 We would need the following information on the Town of Hudson's water supply system before we could comment on their adequacy should they later be designated as the water supply source: 1. A summary of water rights owned or controlled by the District. 2. The yield of these rights both in an average and a dry year. 3. The present demand on the system and the anticipated demand due to commitments for service entered into by the District. 4. A map of the service area. In conclusion, we do not feel adequate work has been completed on the water supply plan to give PUD rezoning plat approval. Sincerely, ho /� Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State Engineer HDS/JRH:ma/4534H cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Steve Lautenschlager EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SIFT 2 dJ Case (1� � � /uu� r 1 �� i � - Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description V B. / 2 _.- /% s://;Pr 4r !// , c1 'hc i f/ C. / 71.,//(/), r Cj ,LCO 'r.; - E. 0 ..erad6 0222.144,, , e .� z0/ss I( F. l o-W-(in if A - t Yl1,0\ cep 2 /c/g 5 G. (11 �1�/ o ', 'E !/X .e/Lcd 1AQ/2//I[� H. I. J. K. • M. N. O. BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNVp11C1?MMSTC/M'ER9!F©S C CASE NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 APR $ ) -; NAME: Greater Hudson Development Company ADDRESS: c/o Lee Murata, 13877 Highway 52, Fort Lupton,Gki.LCo`lorado°LO' 80621 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development- (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parts of Sections 33 and 34, T2N, and parts of Sections 2 and 3, TIN, all in R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent and north of Hudson town limits; north of State Highway 52 and I-76, east of Weld County Road 41. be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1 . It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has failed to demonstrate in written or oral statements to date that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan addresses residential and commercial development with the following policy statements: A) Residential Policy #1 on Page 59 states: "New residential developments which are not closely connected to and served by municipal utilities and services shall be discouraged." The proposed Planned Unit Development District would be a 1,089 acre site adjacent to the town of Hudson for a distance of one—fourth (1/4) mile on the town's northern boundary. The town of Hudson should provide services becasue of the proximity to the town and the proposed Planned Unit Development's need for urban services. B) Residential Policy #2 on Pages 59 and 60 states: "Proposals for new residential development adjoining existing municipalities shall be encouraged so long as they conform to the desires of the towns as expressed in their comprehensive plans." Z-418:85:4 Greater Hudson Development Company April 2, 1985 Page 2 The proposed Planned Unit Development District is not compatible with Hudson's Comprehensive Plan, and the town has expressed a desire to work on an annexation plan and future rezoning of the property with the applicant. C) Residential Policy #3 on Page 60 states: "Existing municipalities are the hest and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments and will be looked to for service of all new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality." The proposed Planned Unit Development District would eventually contain an estimated 1, 167 residential units with an estimated base population of 3,641 people. The Weld County Tax base should not be expected to support law enforcement expenses, road maintenance, and other services for this urban development. D) The formation of separate water and sewer services as proposed in the application materials is not consistent with the following policy statement as set forth on Pages 91 and 92 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan: "Proliferation of service districts shall be opposed while consolidation of existing service districts shall he encouraged when it tends to improve the efficiency and economy of the service." In order to comply with this policy, the proposed water and sewer services should be provided by the districts now serving the town of Hudson. If necessary, those districts should be upgraded in order to accomplish the additional burden of service. E) Commercial Policy #1 on Page 61 states: Z-418:85:4 Greater Hudson Development Company April 2, 1985 Page 3 "Commercial development will not be encouraged in the unincorporated areas of the County unless it can be shown by the developer that the proposed commercial use cannot reasonably be located in an urban area." The applicant has failed to demonstrate in written materials or oral statements to date that the proposed Planned Unit Development cannot be located in an urban area. It is staff's opinion because of the physical location, the size, and potential impacts to the town of Hudson that the applicant reach agreements with the town of Hudson and locate the proposal in accordance with the town's Comprehensive Plan. This process should also involve the applicant working with the town of Hudson to amend its Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. IT. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the applicant has failed to demonstrate in written or oral statements to date that the uses which would be permitted shall be compatible with the future development as projected by the Hudson Comprehensive Plan. The town of Hudson has indicated in letters dating March 10, 1985, and March 13, 1985, that: A) The proposed rezoning is not compatible with Hudson's Comprehensive Plan (see Document I) ; B) The town of Hudson would like the developers to complete their petition for annexation, and the town would prefer to have the privilege of zoning after annexation (see Document II) ; and C) The town of Hudson will not provide municipal services to areas outside of town boundaries (see Document II) . The applicant has failed to demonstrate that this request complies with Section 28.3. 1. 1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The request for a change of zone is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan; - That the pses which will be allowed under the proposed Planned Unit Development plan will conform to the performance standards of the Planned Unit Development District; Z-418:85:4 Greater Hudson Development Company April 2, 1985 Page 4 - -That the uses which would be allowed on the subject Troperty by granting the change of zone will be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by zoning and with the future development as projected by the plans of affected municipalities; - -That adequate water and sewer service can be made available to serve the site; - -That street or highway facilities can adequately provide access to the property to meet the requirements of the proposed zoned district. Motion seconded by Bill McMurray Vote: For Passage -Against Passage Bill. McMurray -Stephen Hamilton Paulette Weaver Doug Graff Lydia Dunbar Jack Holman Sharon Linhart Bob Ehrlich The Chairman declared the -Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, no hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy o₹ the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, -Colorado, adopted on April 2, 1985, and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. :Dated the 3rd day of April, 1985. ^ Bobbie Good i\ Secretary Exhibit Inventory Control Sheet Case Number 2 " /(8 y Tate Submitted Exhibit Received Int. By Description A. -1ArrAiCOR10,4 646 GI per Lee. -fr B. 4..w1 (Las- fr.., be y r 3c. " Staikat F,+5.Ncx.,%JS C. C0Z Pct-- 6y 2€1 fp:2,w Em5:4 '^'5 nn D. -O(YSe- JCataMa Mc a.�.�a�( 24 pc Ere-to _lo y `J E. {6n s� . Mob 4Oµ / Po��- Ls .c %alp 4l. F. led w-cd,..TAN itica rlso,a pc-ert-• 'tab Gate., MIA&IPLeb.. G. L.e'fiy. -IoM AO vi541J er guts pr -erea. W e.%Tex.,Sa da H. La4+c . (risk FklcO fret,“ / Psaaa- Mow LAI Moa►foa co.,„ I. Lek -7l0µ /l: gee-ad Gcot cal Swat -fro.... Tc,nnJu5. .LA.$co J• -Let#lil 4r#a clofionc o kcCJNj Covw.,ss,w.j (sit4 .:' ed 1O3 5tiue.C PAN J /,`v t-, K. tti tJ. •tia Sc.S S�M iffro Z /� see I. ///.." t (loµ /Uoewl fa...4 &i h m416,..„_ a5c j� 0.6m.p.rtatt submitted ze.) &cPcW AAA) A -M. 5'E'4( &eoMMe. A9tO4 /2 P4'crieS N. T' 1 SaSol d ottastt4S 7 P ctt P,e.�f�c+�- S 0. P 6o A3 W vrle �{�repescQ ` 7 fC`'a211 sib Exhibit Inventory Control Sheet Case Number mate Submitted Exhibit Received Int. By Description %q PYtiwIt C'ok•a-:ZS ica 'i ?alp faCts4 ea # f_ Le4-6. tr." StS P O C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -PLAN APPLICATION 1,,'.;,' O i 19-85 Department of Planning Services, 915 — 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 :Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DE-PARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPL. FEE 30D ,D0 ZONING DISTRICT RECORDING FEE _ DATE RECEIPT NO. APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE -COMPLETED -BY -APPLICANT: (Print or type -only -except for required signatures) : I (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County -Planning Commission -concerning proposed subdivision of the following described unincorporated area of Weld Dainty. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel I: -The East one-half (E;) of Section 33, Township 2 North, Range 65 -West of the 6th -P.M. Parcel II: -Me Northwest quarter (NWT) of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range E5 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel III: The North half (Nr) of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range a55 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel IV: the South half (S1) of Section 34, Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. (I₹ additional space is required, attach an -additional sheet of this -same size.) NAME OF PROPOSED -P.U.D. SUBDIVISION Greater Hudson Development Company (Hudson Gardens) EXISTING ZONING_aire PROPOSED ZONING TOTAL AREA (ACRES) 1.0$9 NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS LOT SIZE: AVERAGE -MINIMUM UTILITIES: WATER: NAME Well-s and augur-entation SEWER: NAME Lagoons GAS: NAME -Greeley -Gas PHONE: NAME Mountain -Bell DISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME Weld County District RE 3J FIRE: NAME Hudson Tire Prevention District DESIGNERS' NAME qautira Development Company Lee Murata Rep ADDRESS San Antonio. Texas ' PHONE _857_6864 ENGINEERS' NAME Alpha uhneineerinr'/Ceri1 Crowe ADDRESS _617 5th. Fort Lupton. DO 80621 PHONE 857_2308 FEE OWNER OF -AREA -PROPOSED FOR P.U.D. SUBDIVISION NAME Wallace 0. Yaung ADDRESS Hudson, -Colorado d0642 PHONE 5J6-481M NAME ADDRESS PHONE NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 hereby _depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application -are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. -COUNTY OF -WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) ' i/ , �[�/aG(' t n t Signature: ewner(tf Authorized Age t �` [SubscrJ ed and sworn to before me this 2 day of Ft$fsi4t . , 19gC " S. -CRC /Yr. •.v • y EAL Zfer- 9t,f " N TO ARY PUBLIC OF C0 My commission expires: A,4,71 `/e j /rrc 804-79-026 WCDPS-78-1 E'x‘.;bd A- Greater Hudson Development Company 13877 Highway 52 Fart Lupton, Colorado 80621 February 22, 1985 James H. Mayerl Weld County Dept of -Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Comprehensive Report — Hudson Gardens Planned Community Dear Mr. Mayerl : Combining the test af both worlds, the peace and quiet of country living with all the amenities of the big city, Hudson _Gardens offers a unique opportunity An home ownership . Dis- tinctive -modular homes d-esigned for convenience and afforda- bility are nestled amoung the towering cottonwood trees winding through the community. Encompassing over a thousand acres, this planned community will -provide complete coverage af necessary services in- cluding -schools, parks, recreation, shopping, and Tire and police protection. The natural greenbelt of trees, streams and ponds divides the quiet residential sections from the convenient commercial shopping areas . Large tracts of recreational land have been included within the development to enhance the enjoyment of life in Hudson Gardens . Easy access to the Denver Metropolitan area is provided by Interstate 7-6 which is adjacent to the community . Traffic patterns are designed to allow convenient access to commer- cial areas without disrupting the quiet of the residential community . Yours truly, J72, ; La Lee Murata January 18, 198-5 Greater Hudson Development Co. 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 To Wham It May Concern: This letter is to verify that I have a signed agreement , with substantial money dawn, on the property for sale to -Greater Hudson Development Company . All the land that i3 of record in Weld County, Colorado that I control in the following legal descriptions : Contains 1079 acres more or less . Parcel I : The East one—half (E' ) af Section 33, Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel II : The Northwest _quarter (NW'.;) of Section 2, Town- ship 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel III : The North half (N1) of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel IV: The South Half (S?) of Section 34, Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Together with any and all interests which I may have in, or to, all oil, coal, ;as and other minerals in, on, or under- neath the real property; And Together with 13 shares of Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Co. water certificates No. 3318, 3618, and 1_619 and together with -all water rights and benefits accruing to the above described real property and adjudicated irrigation well in Colorado Water _Court . This letter is intended to _provide information to support the P.U.D. Zoning application. Hoping you -are successful in obtaining the zoning, Yours truly, an ow er NOTARY PUBLIC : Witness rriy hand & sea . My Commission Expires : - 8l0 LORI LUPI0N BANK Street ( fortl.upton.Colorado 80621 Greater Iiudson Development Co. 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton4 Colorado 80621 February 25, 19B5 Susan Worth, Mayor Town of Hudson Hudson, Colorado 89642 Madam Mayor: This letter is to inform you that we are completing the application for a P .U.D. Zoning proposed by Greater Hudson Development Co . However, after much consideration and discussion with the Weld County Planning Board, we have been advised to continue with the annexation plans if possible. We are of the opinion that this effort can be most beneficial to the Town of Hudson as well as the whole community. In any event we are locking forward to a pleasant and cooperative working relationship . Yours truly, )1•Zt -97744.;<!-Itt Lee Murata cc Weld founty Planning Com. Greater Hudson Development Company 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 February 22, 1985 James R. Mayerl Weld County Dept of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Coloraod $0631 Dear Mr. Mayerl : The development area is to conform to the Weld County Comprehen- sive plan. The soils and topography survey provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service states that the area is described as Valent - Vona soil. The Vona soils are of' the more gentle sloping topography. The -sandy texture is the main limitation in farming. For Urban development it is rated fair. We -will not be taking top production soil from agriculture. The pasture land will be controlled from wind erosion as development progresses . A complete planned design of the community with oiled -streets, curbs, lights, drainage and fire hydrants at strategic points to meet the safety code for the community and fire district will be designed and installed. All water, sewer and drainage lines will be installed to County and State spec- ifications . The lagoons _for the development will be designed to accomod-ate the -waste from the present Hudson lagoons when it outgrows its facilities . The area where the lagoons are to be built will not be in the flood plains. Flood Insurance Rate map shows the south area of the intended location for the lagoons is not in a flood area. The area lying to the north o-f the site is classified as Zone A. Zone A is up to one foot of water -flow. The site area has no recorded floods . The -dikes for the lagoon will have at minimum a 4 foot embankment . The lagoon shall be seal-ed to minimise the seepage factor. Alpha Engineering will do the engineering and design far the lagoons, water mains, sewers and drainage for the project . Yours truly, C- oi-t e G� Lee Murata Greater Hudson Development Co 1-3877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 March 1, 1985 James R. Mayen Weld County Dept of 2lanning 915 1Dth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Weld County Comprehen-live Plan Dear Mr. Mayerl : The importance of agriculture in Weld County in respect to the economical resources is one of the best assets for the Lounty . The agriculture industry in the whole nation is in a Sad sit- uation. In order for it to survive and strengthen it needs 2 main factors : 1 . There has to be -a need. 2 . There has to be a use . The population of the Country creates the need and the use of any phase of the agriculture industry . Therefore, the proposal for the development will have a part in estatlishing a need and use along with the use of land as the comprehensive plan relates to the following considerations : 1 . The proposed site is located adjacent to an existing community with all the utilities near the area . It will not have the "sprawled out", no plan design. It will to a well designed and pl-anned -development that would be a credit to any community . The zrowth development will continue to this area from the south. 2 . The Weld County Colorado Boil survey report proposed by the U .S . Department of Agriculture classifies the project site as Volent-Vona soil . It is not the prime land for agriculture but a rolling sandy texture with a -good drainage, but subject to wind erosion if not controlled. It is referred to as "fair" for development . The development site has well established highway, ser- vine roads and access points . 3 . The creation of a tuilt in green belt for the project has naturally provided huge trees across the site for a distance of approximately 4D00 feet in length. This will WELD COUNTY C-OMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONT'D Page 2 be used as a breaker or back up for rea reati-on and parks . There is several small lakes to enhance any design with continuous water movement to the drain- age canal . Bordering the project site to the west -is some prime farm land with excellent operators to grow any farm commodity. This gives the area an added feature to recognize the value of a comprehensive plan of prime land preservation by the County . I am a firm believer in conservation, plans and controls -if imposed to improve and not to reject . The potential growth in the future has every indication of following Interstate 76 . -In my opinion, in the near future, the population growth in this area could be in the millions . Yours truly, 'T2 Lee Murat-a LDENVER Alpha FORT -2 857-2305308 573-5180 Engineering P.O. 50% 392 60 5" STREET FORT LUPTON COLORADO. 80621 January 30, 1985 • RE: 1079 acre P.U.D. site - Greater Hudson Development Co . To Whom It May Concern: The extreme Northwest side of the 1079 acre site is located in a Flood Hazard Plain according to National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Man, Community Panel Number 080266 0900 C, effective September 28, 1982 . (See attached Map) None of the soils on this site have moderate or severe limita- tions for the uses planned according to the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service soils survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part . Below is a • soils map of the described property. i r n :t s. ,e Idit HILLS .. J. ' 10 nits " 49 I n. tt I. I e - ++ •1.,. .. . . , • ‘‘.4‘,. L R C.- te 61 �. SS n m + 4�' je'""IbT"a - ' 1(u n • Ce.A g 'I 'o .i a •' f'% J. • fy . .. 'T, ;, ,el ,� ��♦ > I 2.90 AF Y } ,r-... •.:1- i+ . 9N ,. 41 I .. l_ . l, 1 . • o /.t& 1,,a+ *co N LFAENn ' ' 1 1 4 "Apollo and Aquepts, Flooded Scale of feet 27 Heldt silty clay, 1-3% slopes 35 Loup-Hoel yloamyman 51-3% e-3% slopes �� t�N� 44 Olney lousy sand 1-3k slops. ( LLL�i�/// � 45 Olney loamy sand 3-5 % slopes Cecil R C� p,�• & L.S. /2330 47 Olney fine sandy loam 1-3% slopes ,OILS MAP 49 Osgood sand 0-3% slopes 1079-ACRI. SITE 69 Valentsend 0-3% slopes 1079-ACRE SECTIONS 33 AND 34 70 Valant sand 3-9% slopes R6,T2N5W '• 72 Vona loamy sand 0-3% elopes T2N265 2 AND 3 82 Wiley-Colby complex 1-3% slopes SECTIONT1N N65W WELD COUNTY, C01.ORAnn eAmm Property boundary - Source: Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Platte Valley Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 October 18, 1984 Mr. James R. Mayerl , Current Planner Weld County Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number S-242 :84: 14 Lee Murata, Greater Hudson Development Company Dear Mr. Mayerl : We have the following comments on this referral . Soils: According to the map of "Important Farmlands of Weld County Colorado", a small part of this land in sections 2 and 3, township 1 north, range 65 west , would be prime if they become irrigated. Soil limitations have been covered in the report by Judith L. Hamilton dated February 28, 1984. Drainage: This appears to be covered in the report by Judith L. Hamilton dated Feb- ruary 28, 1984. Drainage should be done on any area where the soils show a flooding problem if structures are to be built there, even though fill material is brought in to raise the elevation. We agree with the above mentioned report that all drainage systems should have a positive outfall . An overall drainage plan should be prepared. It appears that most of the runoff will drain into the Beebe Seep Canal . This part of the drainage plan should be approved by the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Com- pany, Brighton, Colorado. The runoff from section 2, township 1 north, range 65 west will drain mostly in a northeasterly direction. Provisions should be made for this drainage. Erosion and Sediment Control : We agree with the statement, in the report by Judith L. Hamilton, that these soils are susceptible to blowing. Soils should be protected to prevent erosion, especially during the windy season. Water erosion can also be a problem on unprotected land where water collects and runs off, such as down spouts and drainage ways. An erosion and sediment control plan should be prepared for this proposed development. Included in this plan should be a drainage plan. Sincerely, Bob Warner, President Board of Supervisors CONSL RVATION - DEVELOPMENT SELF-GOVERNMENT \I ,/ ILA / 2 n / m 21 Let )[lam . I ( /// I 2Calin I I /% �__ f i R65 0 - // ------ - 1 ---- - ---J ,� �� II �A SINKS I VAS / hood ISJNnJn II � I MIGHION OIHCE i //to-t/CO/� ii do sartH z AVHAI1 7" II \�__i� MUGHTOH' 10601 / / CQ::::: /oa•yta. /upd% II bd JWz<1iNSJnd11? ?vd A. S .Nof _29 29 4 td5 // 26//� ' o/r.� °/�' N II // �// I II \'\ // u - _—/1==--- — ��--- ; 7------ ��\ /;re/ l I`\ / aga,�66 /o9ao8 \ weld 6°Kn4`//O/oKsdo • \\\\\\\-` / a !I ` /((n iumert /" /ge9 I \\ ...N-_.,„__ TZ/J _ OtaniE ----j � 5 rini:/— cif ?—_— ----�—It? 2 --ii 1II J nap \{ � II �� O AIS \` ,,, , \\\\l \ 1 09'0246 /0e./257 ICJ . . _./ LJe ld�euN�,t 4et'dA , @ �\--- --ien/hCoSeOO'ledAieex) ,��. p ----7L—=:—_ Town of Hudson ===__ ----- - ).-\ /)I J2G/1 /p, I�Q IIAREA NOT INCLUDE I11I ZONE C I I A t= n iI — 111TI / Ir 11 // II unto* P II U No. _i__________ J \*\' 1II c E.Mlm.n 11 M le ..._ _______—;71 16 =/-= \\,\CS \ N.Nlroie IA / -N1/4, , \-4- II X11 ® NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM � I FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP II . WELD COUNTY, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO COLORADO (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) PANEL 900 OF 1075 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) PANEL 1025 OF 1075 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) I COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 080266 0900 B 080266 1025 B EFFECTIVE DATE: EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 18, 1980 MARCH 18, 1980 1/4 III +E 1111\ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ;I AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION/ AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION an QM., 0. to KEY TO MAP KEY TO MAP • A0-Year Flood Boundary-- 500-Year Flood Boundary—— — 00-Year Flood Boundary ---x,ENE BP+` 100 Year Flood Boundary • ZONE B U i¢ s•With Zone Designations.With sate f Id Y!'' Ion Identification Date of at on /_ -a_ 1211/74 / <.g ea '00.Year Flood Boundary 100-Year Flood Boundary --_. - ;00-Year Flood Boundary _ t� NE B+, ZONE B ,. son Year Flood Boundary m lase Flood Elevation Line 573 Base Flood Elevation Line 573 V itb Elevation In Feet•• With Elevation In Feet•• lase Flood Elevation in Feel (EL 9871 :Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 9871 Vnere Uniform Within Zane•• Where Uniform Within Zone•• ileyation Reference Mark RM7x .Elevation Reference Mark RM7 x River Mile •M1.5 I River Mile •M1.5 ••Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 !^Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 "EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS "EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS ZONE EXPLANATION ZONE EXPLANATION A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and A Areas of 100-year flood; b-in hood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. Hood hazard factors not determined. —A0 Areas of 100-y shallow flooding where depths AO Areas of 100-year shallow Hooding where depths are between one e(1)and three(3)feet;average depthsare bet" one 111 and three U)feet,average depths inundation re shown,but no flood hazard factors i o inundatio re shown,but no Hood hazard factors are determined. are determined. AH Areas of I00-year shallow flooding where depths AN Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths elare between one (I) and three (3) feet;base flood I are between one 01 and three (3) feet;base flood evations are shown, but no flood hazard factors elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determind, are determind. ' 11-A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and Al-A30 Areas of 100-year flood base flood elevations and ' flood hazard factors determined. flood hazard factors determined. A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood I protection system under construction; have flood elevations and flood hazard factor not determined. elevations and flood hazard actors not determined. B Areas between l'im'its of the 10Oyear flood and 500- I a Areas between limns at the 100-year Hood and 500- yearflood;or certain subject to 100-year flood- . areas year flood;or certain ar subject to I00year flood- ing with average depths less than one(1)foot or where ing with average depths the less than one I1)mot tar where the contributing drainage area Is less than one square the contributing drainage area is less then one square mile;or areas protected by levees from the base flood. mile;or areas protected by levees from the base flood. (Medium shading) (Medium shading) C Arta,of minimal flooding.(No shading) C Ares of minimal flooding.(No shading) Si Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. O Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. V Areas of I00-year coastal flood with velocity (wave V Areas of I 00-year coastal flood whb velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. not determined. al-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave VI-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal Mood with velocity (wave • action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. determined. NOTES TO USER NOTES TO USER erlain areas not to the special flood hazard areas(zones A ano VI Certain areas not in the special flood hazard areas(zones A and V) ' may be protected by flood control structures. may be protected by flood control structures. his map is for flood Insurance purposes only;it does not octet- This map is for flood insurance purposes only;it does not neces- rily show all areas subject to flooding in the community 'oily show all a subject to flooding the community or I plane metric features outside special flood hazard areas or all plan i metric features outside special flood hazard areas. or adnut ing map panels, see separately printed Index To Map For adjoining map panels, see sep.tutely ponied lodes 10 Map tnels. Panels. i l INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: INITIAL II1EN111 IC AI ION MARCH 71,1978 MARCH dl tare FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: FL<I0U HAZARD d0UNUARV n1A1'BI VIS Il1N1. JUDITH 1 . HAMILTON Consulting Geologist and Engineer GROUND - WATER AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 2951 Curtis Street • Denver, Colorado • 80205 • (303) 296-9467 January 17, 1985 Mr. Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: As you requested, I reviewed the water availability for your property com- prising approximately 1079 acres in Sections 33 and 34, T2N, R65W and Sec- tions 2 and 3, T1N, R65W, Weld County, Colorado. As stated in my report of February 28, 1984, the water availability from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer is estimated to be 188 to 251 acre-feet per year. Water availability from the Arapahoe aquifer, which is likely to be considered tributary, and from the alluvium, will be dependent upon the augmentation program developed since the physical availability is considerably higher than the proposed development is likely to require. If a central sewage collection and treatment system is installed, I believe that an augmentation program can be develeped which will utilize return f ows from the Laramie-Fox Hills wells for make-up water for the relatively minor amount (assumed 10%) of consumptive use. I would suggest the following steps for development of your water supply. Some o₹ these may have already been instituted. 1. Apply for adjudication of the Laramie-Fox Hills and Arapahoe permit appli- cations. 2, Apply in Water Court for approval of an augmentation plan utilizing re- turn flows from the sewage treatment plant to supply 90% of the make-up re- quired for tributary water use, with the 10% consumptive use being supplied _by return flows from the Laramie-Fox Hills wells. 3. Drill test holes on your property to determine suitable locations for producing adequate quantity and quality of alluvial water. 4. Apply for well permits for alluvial wells in the most suitable locations. These permits will be denied because they are tributary, but approval of the permits can be requested through the water court in the augmentation process. 5. Apply to the State Health Dept. for a discharge permit for the proposed sewage treatment facility. You will need to have a water attorney involved in the adjudication and aug mentaties programs. I will be happy to work with your attorney on these matters. Water quality analyses from wells in the general area of you property, obtained from Stan Robson of the US Geological Survey, are shown on Table 1. These analyses indicate that a general deterioration in quality probably occurs in a downstream dieection. While the well in Section 17, T1N, R65W indicates acceptable quality, the downstream wells are too highly mineralized. Samples from test holes on your property will be used to determine the quality in your location to determine any treatment which might be necessary. A suggested water supply plan for submission to the County is attached. If you have any questions on it, or on this letter, please let se know. Sincerely, /11��'' 1Ju/� '�dith L�Hamilton WATER SUPPLY ELAN The supply for in-house use will be from two or more wells in the Larmmie- Fox Hills aquifer, from augmented wells in the Arapahoe formation, and from augmented shallow wells in the alluvium. Return flows from the Laramie-Fox Hills wells -will be used to supply make-up water for consumptive use from the tribu- tary -wells. At -an assumed consumptive use -of 10%, return flows form the esti- mated 188 to 251 acre-feet per year supplied from the Zaramie-Fox Hills wells would te 18.8 to 25.1 acre-feet per year, allowing use -of approximately 1880 to 2510 acre-feet fer year from tributary -wells. The total supply -for in-house would therefore be approximately 2170 to 2750 acre-feet per vtar. This would be sufficient to supply approximately 7230 to 9000 homesites at a use rate of .3 acre-feet per house fer year. A central -water supply system and central sewage collectinn and treatement system will be proviced for the development. Irrigati-on water sill be supplied through a -separate _distribution system from the Henrylyn Ditch, for which 20 shares are currently availableto the property. Approximately 400 acres from two central pivot systems are currently being irrigated from these shares. This is approximately 40% of the property. Assu- ming that 2.3 acre-feet per acre -of water is -applied and that 5000 square feet of land per lot is irrigated, approximately 34-80 lots could te supplied with the equivalent amount of water use. Irrigating 4000 square feet per lot, approxi- mately 1360 lots could be supplied. 'FABLE 1 ANALYSES TROM SHALLOW WELLS IN GENERAL VICINITY AF PROPERTY 2 miles 1 mile 2 miles So . & W. N. & h W. N. & 11 W. Location of TIN, -R65W T2N R65W T2N R65W Sample Sect. . 17bcc Sect. 32aba1 Sect. 16bcc Date of sample April 26, 1977 April 26, 1977 19S7 Constituent: m9/1 Calcium S9 180 160 Magnesium 38 71) 62 Potassium 4.4 5.3 9.2 -Sodium 120 220 236 Bicarbonate 330 400 290 Carbonate 0 0 0 Chloride 90 120 130 Fluoride 1.5 1.8 1.8 Sulfate 220 630 705 Nitrate and 7.9 11 19 Nitrite Specific Conductance • 1230 2090 2080 Total Dissolved Solids No -data No data 1540 •Micromhos at 2510 C. Analyses obtained from Stan Robson, _U.S. Geological Survey lad IJ U D I T #I L . HAMILTON Ca-nsulting Geologist and Engin-eer G R O U N D • WATER AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 2951 Curtis Street • Denver, Colorado • a0205 • ( 303) 2%G-9167 April 22, 1984 Mr. Lee Murata 13877 Hwy 52 Ft. Lupton, Colo. B0621 Dear Lee : Encloser is the one-year extension on Permit 264-56-F. The State Engineer' s Office will not grant the permit to redrill it at the new location as long as that application is also for a change in use , however. As discussed with you, you will need to contact a water attorney in order to get the change in use through the water court. 7 will be happy to work with your attorney on this. The remaining applications are still in lzrocess. You could also apply for adjudication of these applications. Sincerely, )64./fr_ udith L. Hamilton Z. �Q •�"�'-Y!1�/ e owunn, '� ((ff''"""" 1.tl, 1 nginr, 1 \► /876 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado130203 (303) 866-3581 April 18, 1984 Ms. Judith L. Hamilton Consulting Geologist and Engineer 2951 Curtis -Street Denver, CO 80205 RE: Jell Permit No. 26456-F' 111'.1r 11':. Hamilton: I: uW' LO t'ulli' I�•1 c• tIn' I'.•I �9 'IN'� 'I a ll -ii l Your re<lue;t for an extension ut I' put water to beneficial use has been received and rtviewc 1. You are hereby given notice that an txVc11:;I( I ul nnl' yvar hi /LEI 1985 has been approved by the -State Engineer. A copy of the am,-n(a•II wl tf parfait is -enclosed. Please to advised that pursuant to Coloiiu(, Revised Statute 37-90-137(3) (a) , additional extensions cannot he approve]. Once the well is completed and the pennantnt pump is installed, wull completion and pimp installation report; including well and permanent pum@ test data must he submitted to this office. After water from the well has been put to beneficial use and prior to the well permit expiration date, evidence of beneficial use must he received by this satfice. `1'he well owner is responsible for -submitting the evidence of benefical use. A Statement of Peneficial Use form was provided to the applicant when the well permit was issued. Additional forms arc available from well contracture,, ('wf, installers, and Lolorado Division of Water Resources offices. Sincerely, Steve Iiulten:;chlager Water Resource:; Engineer Ground Water -Section SPL/mah t'.nclosure Nlu.s.,tt,.. 76 C2.,R-ADO DIVISION OF WP>PTER RESOU _S 1 't 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St;)Denver,-Colorado 80203 ,. { _(��(_I t�ED • REG€IVED PERMIT APPLICATION FOR S' " 2 el 19.92 Application must --I 1982 •' be complete where ( I A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WA�Ennrr RT 2 9 " -` "' Hitt applicable. Type or ( ) A PERMIT TO CONST-HUCT A'WE print in BLACK �{pTEB aMGINEL2 <it I FOR: ( ) A PE INSTALL-A PUMP SGIE-tNGIREkY INK. No overstrikes COLO. RECEIV or erasures unless ( 1 REPLACEMENT FOR NO. initialed. ( I OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. APR 1 A (1) APPLICANT - mailing address FOR OFFICE UqE O,yf L (QO OT WRITE IN T u,Z. ;; ji HIm tara Young , Wallace Gilbert Young Y2bTh y NAME—ara Pauline Young and Harold CharlesWilliam Young / WtD. (`i'� necerpt NO STREET PO -Box 164_--- --. Bain 7"l (id III Dist. ---- CITY 11110Fon Colorado 80642 • (state) Clip) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TELEPHONE NO. (303) 623-$286 _ This well shall be used in such -a way as to cause no material injury to -existing water rights. Tile (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water Weld Tight or preclude_another owner of a vested water County right from seeking relief in a civil court action. SE 'h of the SL h, Section_2.4______ 1 ) APPROVED PURSUANT TO THE ATTAC-H D FINDINGS OF TIIE STATE _ENGINEER, _DATED lYC- Y I"'-2N- 1_, S' R'''' 15-- _ Wr 6th P.M. 2) THE MAXIMUM PUMPING RATE SFI7 Y LIITTTEU TO 100 G .P.M. (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA 3) THE MAXIMUM ANNUAL -AMOUNT OF WATER TO RI DIVERTED BY THIS WELL SHALL NOT EXCEED 140 Proposed maximum pumping rate !giant/ _100 G.P .I". ACRE FEET, PURSUANT TO THE _DIVISION I LATER COURT DECREE 79CW111 . Average annual amount of ground water 4) GROUND WATER PRODUCTION FROM THIS WELL to be appropriated (acreieet):___ 140__-____ SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE LAR-AMIE-FOX HILLS Number of acres to be irrigated: 880 AQUIFER WHICH IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 700 --- FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE AND EXTENDS TO AN Proposed total depth (feet): 2100 feet APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF 950 FEET -BELOW LAND SUR- FACE. Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: 5) A TOTALIZING FLOW METER MUST -BE INSTALLED Pox rill °ands ON THIS WELL . DIVERSION RECORDS MUST BE -- - MAINTAINED BY THE WELL OWNER AND SUBMITTED TO Owner's well designation _ THE DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES , UPON REQUEST. GROUND WATER TOI3El1SEDEOTi: 6) THE OWNER SHALL MARK THIS WELL IN A -CONSPICUOUS PLACE WITH THE PERMIT NUMBER AND ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation 10) THE NAME OF TIE AQUIFER. HE SHALL TAKE 1 )DOMESTIC 11) ( I INDUSTRIAL (5) NECESSARY MEANS AND PRECAUTIONS TO PRESERVE ( ) LIVESTOCK (2) ( `t3FTRRIGATIDN (6) THESE MARKINGS. ( ) COMMERCIAL (4) ( I MUNICIPAL (81- PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE EXTENDED ONE YEAR TO I IDTHER (91 - . APPLICATION APPROVED APRIL 19, 1985. o_ rt-i DETAIL THE USE ONIACK IN (11) - - 2f-�1 -^p —F .- PERMIT NUMBER -t i) (1) DRILLER APR 1 S 1983 DATE ISSUED /� [� (� q(jQ Name Livings tan & tivingSrton FXPIR.\?IONDATE AP 19 1984 (-drilled a. gas well in 1[352) Street Ailet,Tulsa Oklahoma ss — _ — City-_ tSTAT± NcNEERI Mate) fZm) -- ' / � Telephone No _ ._ t-ic. No._ / - 0 / [! * Successors in interest to E F: C YoUf?tg , Inc . CO11NTY_L? ______ (5) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELL and the area on (6) TN ''ELL MUST BE LOCATED BELOW which the water will be used mt. : indicated on the diagram below. by t. .nces from section lines. Use the CENTER SECTION (1 secoon, 640 acres) for the well location. 1145 . 5 South r • + — + — + — + — + — -1•- — + — + — - - ft. from (north or sour1 -sec.line lrE 1 MILE,5280 FEET- :l f I 567 . 5 ft. from— East sec. line (east or west) } —I— + + + + + + 1 _LOT BLOCK FILING or l I I • Ark_ NORTH SECTION LINE — + — SUBDIVISION -r.a be I - I I (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE .tom i, / LOCATED Owner. Clara E Young , c t l.r�ya7 - - 1 - m I 160 Will Pm Le D No. of acres I -i / m ' the only well on this tract? Yes _- _ 1 — - -1--_ ti -4- — _ 5 (8) PROPOSED CASING PROGRAM . z r + .,lI Plain Casing See Exhibit C - - — Z XtS - �- _m in. front tt. lu—.____—_.f(. -r/// A in. from ft. to _ft. CTION LINE�•T%'� #.771-4- Perforated casing I ____ ____In, from _ft. to ft. -}- -r .—_.- -_ in. from __ ft. to It. �� (9) FOR REPLACEMENT WELLS woedinacc, w and direction from old well and plans for plugging + — — 1- it: The scale of the diagram is 2 inches = 1 mile ---------Each small square represents 40 acres. WATER EQUIVALENTS TABLE (Rounded Figures) An acre-foot covers 1 acre of laud 1 foot deep _ --------- --- 1 cubic foot per second (cis( . . .449 gallons per minute (gPrnl A family of 5 will require approeimately 1 acre-foot of water per year. 1 acre-foot . . .43,560 cubic feet . . . 325,900 gallons. 1,000 gpm pumped continuously for one day produces 4.42 acre-feet. (10) LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Owner(s)Clara E . Young , et al Nu. of acres:___ 880 ___-_-- Legal description: See Ex l3-ist—Flc (11) DETAILED DESCRIPTION of the use of wound water: Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of dispo.el system lilt gation. Water will he pumped to reservoir and then Pu1npaU_ fur use in sprinkling system _— (12) OTHER WATER RIGHTS used on this land, including wells. Give Registration and P! !er Court Case Numbers. Type or right _Used for(purpose) Description of land on which used See Exhibit B (13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. ICNATVRE O�PLI,qCANT(S)`trj ( t/ Li/ht., fV t - Use additional sheets of paper if more space is required. pp• .T+,JS-Ree 7h CO.,.,RADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOU :s 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colo 8©'t4iJ LD MCC E4EVE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM APR - 41984 Application must be complete where (X ) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATERDATER RESOURCES E OURC OCT G 4 1933 1iti applicable. Type or (x ) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL t E BATES. print in BLACK FOR: ( ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP •E;ri„6 INK.No overstrikes • ,mt.,e or erasures unless ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO. initialed. ( ) OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. (1) APPLICANT - mailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN 2S� NAME Wallace O. Young Receipt No. T,0/ / ' ` i STREET P.O. Pox 102 Basin — _ Dist. CITY thidsnn Cn7 n P,061:2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (State) (ZIP) TELEPHONE NO. 303-536-4811+ This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water County Weld right from seeking relief in a civil court action. NV) % of the NW Va, Section 2 I J Twp.�_ N Rng. —.655 ,i 6th P.M. ^')t (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gprn) 50 Average annual amount of ground water 30 to be appropriated (acre-feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: lawns and gardens Proposed total depth (feet): 100 Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Arapahoe Owner's well designation A#1- GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) ( ) DOMESTIC (1) ( I INDUSTRIAL (5) ( I LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) (X) COMMERCIAL (4) ( X) MUNICIPAL (8) ( I OTHER (9) APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT NUMBER (4) DRILLER DATE ISSUED Name 11 CPnserf EXPIRATION DATE Street City (STATE ENGINEER) (State) (Z;P) BY Telephone No. _Lic. No. I.D. _ COUNTY _P ,, 76 CC ,RADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOU ES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203cir,-+;�� (5 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM �iv`� �T ,,lication must 0 i "jjs+ IX Le complete where (X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER itt," C-, tfrj a . -applicable. Type or (X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL • FQ �E56 09'09'print in BLACK FOR: (x1 A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP ytt "ENG5 INK.No overstrikes ,Y^ or erasures unless ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO. uiltialed. ( ) OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. — (1) APPLICANT - mailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOTWRITE IN THIS COLUMN NAME Wallace G. young Receipt No. 9O9' / l / 'TT REET P.O. ROX 102 Basin _ _ Dist. CITY Mudson , Colo. 8°642 ($1d1e) (ZIP) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TELEPHONE NO. 7:O3-536—/IR,l11 This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water Weld,,,ty right from seeking relief in a civil court action. PT 15 of the SF %, Section 33 2 IT , Rng. 65 6th P.M. N.S [ 5, (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 50 ((( Average annual amount of ground water 30 u. c' appropriated lacre-feet): l awns and gardens r'.:mber of acres to be irrigated: — L,oposed total depth (feet): i nn _rifer ground water is to be obtained from: Arapahoe _ • G:mcr's well designation A#3 GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( ) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) I I DOMESTIC (tl ( ) INDUSTRIAL (51 1 1 LIVESTOCK (21 ( .1 IRRIGATION (Cl ( pIc COMMERCIAL (4) (X) MUNICIPAL (B) ( I OTHER (9) APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT NUMBER (4) DRILLER DATE ISSUED Name licensed EXPIRATION DATE Street _ City (STATE ENGINEER) (State) (Zip) BY Telephone No _ Lic. No — t/ /,, Y ✓ I.D. / C G _ COUNTY O ..:,,;!rA, Re 76 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 , t:.. PERMIT APPLICATION FORM__ 1 'OC,:-- i placation must Q it Oc, Li t complete where ( X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER iib fL iti nA!�p e )licable. Type or ( X) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL a`'w�rr.ti;so t nt in BLACK FOR: I X) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP to I K.No overstrikes :O A 0 � c -erasures unless ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO. i tialed. ( ) OTHER WATER COURT CASE NO. ( I APPLICANT - mailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN ZSoc' I' .ME V'allaCe G . Voting Receipt No. '9641 / 9 t < REET P_0. pox 102 Basin _ _ Dist. C FY Hltdsnn (',ni n 8O6)i2 (state) (zu:d CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 LEPHONE NO. 303-536-4814 This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The ( , LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water C inty WELD right from seeking relief in a civil court action. ,t,, Y. 3 of the N'' %, Section .t 1 '.r Rng. _65- 1. nth PM. N.s E,W ( It WATER USE AND WELL DATA P . posed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 50 A.,-rage annuat amount of ground water Ic oe appropriated (acre-feet): 30 _ N ember of acres to be irrigated1aWnS and gardens P posed total depth (feet): 100 A.luifer ground water is to be obtained from: Arapahoe C._ner's well designation A! 2 GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: 1 I HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0) 1 1 DOMESTIC (1) ( ) INDUSTRIAL (5) ( I LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (61 1 ..1 COMMERCIAL (4) (X ) MUNICIPAL (8) I I OTHER (9) APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT NUMBER (4) DRILLER DATE ISSUED � 111p 11renc.ed EXPIRATION DATE Street C:y (STATE ENGINEER) (Slate) (zip) BY 1. 'ephone No Lic. No. / — 0 / Y WRJS-Rev.,76 C DRADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES RECEIVED 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver,Colo 80203 0CT 2 41gc9 /// PERMIT APPLICATION FORM MATER Ida Application must �NEER Ps — be complete where ( X) A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER printca Type Kr f X ) A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL � o�`FctS print in BLACK FOR: {L ) A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP e��tCp PAN.,''' INK.No overstrikes V C- re or erasures unless ( ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO. • • initialed. ( I OTHER • WATER COURT CASE NO. (1) APPLICANT - mailing address FOR OFFICE /USSE ONLY 0 NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN r NAME Wallace G. Young Receipt No. 0 V / 9 1 STREET P.O. Rox 102 Basin Dist. CITY Hudson, Colo. 80642 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (State( (Zip) 303—536-4814 This well shall be used in such a way as to cause I TELEPHONE NO. no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water / " County ';del d right from seeking relief in a civil court action. NW s 'A (i; f,°' - ..11-a"" '''h of the vac-, ,Section h3 ci , . . '. Twp. 2 rT Rng. 65 \9 6th P.M. 0)1: 3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm) 75 /t bp,/Average annual amount of ground water 10 74.4_44- 7o to be appropriated (acre-feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: 1 ,91,0417)g and Ern nionG Proposed total depth (feet): 900 Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: Laramie—Fox Hills Owner's well designation ________S-a:5--.11-.-41-2---- GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: ( I HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation(0) NDUSTRIAL (51 ( 1 DOMESTIC (1) ( ) IRRIGATION (6) ( XI COMMERCIAL (41 ( 1 LIVESTOCK ( MUNICIPAL 18) 1 ( I OTHER (9) -APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT NUMBER (4) DRILLER DATE ISSUED Name licensed EXPIRATION DATE I Street (STATE ENGINEER) City (State) (Zip) BY / L Telephone No. — Lic. No. /— D� COUNTY (D O I.D. ............... ......... .. . .. ... ......... e _ _ WEL. OUNTY IIEAL'I'll Nl1'ARTN8 N'I' LABORA1 REF. NO. Li T —1� �' 1516 HOSPITAL -ROAD SAMPLE NO. CREELEY, COLORADO 80631 WA'TE'R _UTILITY: /' /I !.-t-'L{ !? ! (_.--.—, CULLEC'I'i:D BY: .is c '-'' DATE TAKEN DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE AND SOURCE: 7' /(C.;:1" ( / c., r.- /�i Lr _. - _ H , I . RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: DATE J.._ 5. �(-{, TIME I .I) . 0 , BY (2) /c 74 2 I 00/ j DATE COMPLETED j 'a C ` 6 "f MAIL REPORT TO: -2n1;1?-544-2A1.--k#4. 14, ', f'jut- 1` '4'1:' ANALYST (,_,r( ADDRESS: 'C_C tR yWt.t' �;: _ . . - Mandatory Mandatory Non-Mandatory Suggested Parameters Limits Results Parameters Limits Results Turbidity 1 .00 NIT ! , "1/4 -.) pH 6.5 - 0. 5 Arsenic 0.05 mg/1 Total hardness an CaC03 mg/I j Barium 1. mg/1 Calcium as CaCO3mg/1 Cadmium 0.010 mg/1 . t Magnesium 125 mg/1 Chromium 0.05 mg/1 4-... Sodium 20 mg/1 Fluoride 2.4 mg/1 ::)"'•: ` [ . ? ) Chloride 250 mg/1 Eill Lead 0.05 mg/ 1 Sulfate 250 mg/1 Mercury 0.002 mg/l - Phenolphthalein mg/1 as CaC03 Nitrate-Nitrite as N JO mg/1 Nr'.0 -1± ) Rlkalinity Selenium 0.01 mg/1 Total Alkalinity mg/1 as CaC03 , Silver 0.05 mg/ 1 Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 . 'r Specific Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Conductance micromhos/cm Pesticides , Iron 0. 3 mg/1 lEndrin 0.0002 mg/1 hindunc 0.004 mg/I Manganese 0.05 mg/1. Methoxychlor 0. 1 mg/ 1 Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 Copper • 1.0 mg/1 Herbicides Zinc 5.0 mg/1 2,4 - D 0. 1 mg/1 _ 2,4,5. - TP 0.01 mg/1 _______ Ammonia as N mg/1 Radioactivity • Cross Alpha pCi/ 1 Cross Beta p-Ci/1 +'P � I J'I ; ll Radium 226 pCi/1 Strontium -90 pCi/ 1 Pr C. 1 if Tritium pLi/1 - , 1 , 1 1)�' t (/ 1 19-79-094 `s J7". r �1� -y I I n (1,; - Lk COPY ONLY OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALT$ - J y 0 DIVISION OF LABORATORIES I. 4. CHEMISTRY SECTION 84 5 7 j .^l L lab No, Name �r,e. life �A74,2 0O. Date Sampled: S - a - �tiY' , Address: a30/ Le,. J,2 Asbri ,g Date Received: 6-- cl,e5-9 �` City: 1TL-,uvr--,L (,,/, . 7c tz"'/ Date Reported: Lc - / r"—� t 0, -Where Collected: jnclJRv; X-re,fj, A // �j� / yC to if 1 Collected by: CAL Cti-/Tom Mandatory -Results Non-Mandatory -Results -Parameters MCL* -Parameters MSL** Arsenic 0.05 mg/1 C) Total Alkalinity mg/1 Barium 1. mg/1 C3 Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 Cadmium 0.010 mg/1 Specific t4 _Conductance Micromhos " • Chromium 0.05 mg/1 aron 0.3 mg/1 Fluoride 2.4 mg/1 1. 7 Manganese 0.05 mg/1 Lead 0.05 mg/1 C) topper 1.0 mg/1 Mercury 0.002 mg/1 th Zinc 5.0 mg/1 _ Nitrate plus Nitrite 10 mg/1 a. / Molybdenum • mg/1 _ as Nitrogen % Selenium 0.01 mg/1 02(20 a. Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/1 lSt Sodium (recommended) 20 mg/1 71 Calcium as CaCO3 -mg/1 y� Silver 0.05 mg/1 V Magnesium 125 mg/1 yr. Chloride 250 mg/1 Radioactivity Sulfate 250 mg/1 Cross Alpha 15 pCi/1 Cross Beta 50 pCi/1 pH A a t -Radium 226 3 pCi/1 Water Temperatures "' -Radium 228 + 226 5 pCi/1 Langelier Index `' .N Uranium - pCi/1 siki Monthly composite .rs Plutonium pCi/1 ;7I Monthly composite * Maximum contaminate Level ** Maximum suggested Level ."''DIPZRTNENT OF HEALTH •vg 3 • -.... ' COuntgr"-4, IM t ° ar • ••.+ ass Qualic:y _Control Division j li j Faci rMDN/l IYAT�' LIP, . . j East 11th Avenue Street -or P.0. pox j01lli V —0/0-9 /vivre Colorado 80220 City $RIGH7Ditl -a> 706 0/ No. of Taps /DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SURVEY SHEET Populations- d a "l'e • - - ReSident +..: Mon- sident COMPLIANCE . : t _ "Owner, Operator `b0RnAl gt Mark No only if in specific violation of -Phonea�ll -regulations. If No, indicate specific area Account No. - of violation by number. yes No . I. SOURCE REMARKS 1. Surface-a. Name of Source ,- b. 3 mile ordinance enforced ,�"(1/0 . Wife AgviCe kit44....) -Yes No p c. Nearest upstream contamination c /(r09pM source b�rN. 9sf ` . (Nearest potential source of /9f'?I� PM contamination) — Mehl f7Rt Ntirt wr /AI—rent/Ai 2. Well-a. No. , -Depth, Aquifer - st in Remarks b. Sanitary Seal - Yes 4 i of STA4/0 /j9, . c. Elevated Wellhead - Yes S No d. Protecied from surface contamination ^/-0 m e-reR 5 Yes No p II. TREATMENT . r.;tCsssg - PD? *C S%. : t 1. Disinfection - Yes V No ii-r. Yesin✓i Equipment Functioniggpep/eftNMAX i//,fi r. Rer i."' ryL OR NAr4? • free available residual O4 //1mmg'/1 054 cletsK wfN con " rat tea' �/f� _Chlorine Room Proper - Yes s/ No leg , SRC C.N1Rpti •+ wf el 147. 2. Coagulation - Yes No -. �� 1 Sedimentation - Yes No SLANT CLASSIFICATION Filtration - Yes - No NO. OF CERTIFIED OPERATORS 3. Other Treatment - Class Certificate No. (Softening, iron removal, etc.) A A. Has waiver been granted - Yes No B C , III. DISTRIBUTION -rCRgrOR Alan csa ?/riC,f7l1/ 1. Cross connections - Yes No 16,r Location B. H. Engineer: 2. Storage - Number, Size & Type of Construction — eD EE 0O0 JgmLme srf 4 r NV .! Properly Covered & Protected (Includes screens person Interviewed: o n vent & overflows - Yes 1,/ No IV. QUALITY - RECORDS 1. Turbidity (when required) Date &:# Iru : Monthly Reports Kept - Yes-- No }i.>+.r'- I, �/ N ; 2. Chemical - Inorganic - Yes V No Local Health Dept. Representative: S hould organic samples be run - Yes_ No_ err If kes, why . 3. Bacteriological Samples Submitted - Yes " No Turbidisieter Approved !. Number required per month 4 . Yes - No S. Check Samples Run, if required - Yes_ No 4. Exemption or Variances - Yes No E For Divisi of Laboratories j ),I nog o Q lo -Chemistry Section Baseline Brighton Date Sampled: 1-24-77 Weld late Analyzed: 3-29-77 65' Chemist: S. Farrow o£ SuPP1y: Collected: Lochbuie Well #2 MAIL TO: R.A. Hellbusch, City Manager M.W. Bittinger, P.O. Box Q M.W. Bittinger ht. Collins , CO 80522 ttected by: uodatcrY Mandatory I Non-Mandatory Suggested arameters Limits Results L Parameters Limits Results urbidity 1 TB 1.5 Color 15 Cobalt Units 0 rsenic 0.05 mg/1 Total Hardness as 0 CaCO3 mg/1 365 II arium 1. mg/1 0 Calcium AS CaCO3 260 admium -0.010 mg/1 0 Magnesium 125 mg/1 25 bromium 0.05 mg/1 0 Sodium - _ 250 mg/1 luoride 2.4 mg/1 1.7 Chloride 250 mg/1 BO j, ,cad 0.05 mg/1. 0 Sulfate 250 mg/1 160 I lercury 0.002 mg/1 0.0014 Phenolphthalein Citrate as N 10 mg/1 1.4 Alkalinity mg/1 0 iel-enium 0.01 mg/1 0 Total Alkalinity mg/1 260 ;fiver 0.05 mg/1 - 0 Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 30 :hlorinated Hydrocarbons Specific 1020 esticides Conductance Micromhos I Indrin 0.0002 mg/1 0 lindane 0.004 mg/1 0 Iron 0.3 mg/1 0 2 I I iethoxychlor 0.1 mg/1 0 F Toxaphene 0.005 mg/1 0 Manganese 0.05 mg/1 3erbicides Copper 1.0 mg/1 2,4 — D -0.1 mg:1 0 ' 2,4,5, - TP 0.01 mg/1 0 Zinc 5.0 mg/1 0.1 Radioactivity 13 ± 10 Molybdenum -mg/1 D Gross Alpha , 15 pCi/1 • Sonia as N -mg/1 D 6 + 9 Gross Beta 50 pCi/1 D None 4hosphate as P mg/1 Radium 226+ 228 5 pCi/1 _Detected Boron mg/1 0 27 • -_._---.- - i J IJ D I T H L . HAMILTION Consultin-g Gieologisi and Engine-er G R O U N D - WATER AND £ N fl I N E I R I -N G GEOLOGY 2951 Curtis Street • Denver , Colorado • 80205 • ( 303 ) 2<56- Jll„( December 1 , 1984 Mr. Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, Colo. 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: In response to your request,. S have obtained more detailed information on coal resources underlying the 1079-acre site in Sections 2 and 3, TIN, R65W and Sections 33 and 34, TT2N, R65W. My investigations included study of the elec- tric log for permit #21010-F, located in the NE'SEy Section 35, T2N, R65w, drillers' logs for wells 21010-T and well ? 48367. (SESW 34, T2N, Tt65W) , and review of Colorado Geological Survey Information Series 10 (Color-ado Coal Analyses 1976-1979) and lithologic lags from Colorado Geological Survey Open- File Report 28-8. These data indicate that the uppermost coal seams are at depths greater. than 400 feet and are generally -only a few feet in thickness (see attached logs). The Laramie coals are generally classified as subbituminous B. The nearest underground mines, which are no longer operating, are the Logan and Moore Coal Co. Platteville A Mine, located in Section 14 T3N, R66W (operated 1-939- 1940) and the _Platteville 7i Mine, located in Section 29, T3N, R66W (operated J 92-1895). The Coors Company presently operates the Keenesburg Strip Mine in Laramie coals in T3N, -R64W; however, this is a surface mining operation which is considerably cheaper to operate than an underground mine. Any min- ing in the vicinity of your property -would have to be underground because of the depth of the coal. Under present and expected future economic conditions, it is extremely unlikely that the coal underlying your property could be economically mined owing to the -depth, the thinness of the beds, and the expenses involved in safety considera- tions for underground mining. I hope this answers the County's concern about the possibility of undermining your property. If you or the County have any further questions, however, ,lease do not hesitate to call me. •;, O Respectfully suhmilteA, relK Judith L. Hamilton, P.E. Engineering Geologist LOGS OF COAL OCCURRENCES, VICINITY SECTIONS 2 AND 3, T1N, k65W AND 33 AND 34, T2N, k654 Permit # 21010-F, NE'-aSE% Section 35, T2N, R654 Driller's Log, Electric Log (Kirkham, hole 425; interpretation confirmed by JIM Coal 475-484' 505-508 Coal 425-432' 520-524 471-479 545-549 487-492 599-602 505-507 545-547 592-594 Kirkham, OF Report 78-8 (SW' Section 9, T1N, R65W , hole 017) Laramie formation coal 517-522' Kirkham, OF Report 78-8 (SE'NE%a Section 4, T1N, R654, hole W54) Laramie formation coal 495-499' -Figures are depth cf coal from ground surface I bid ] JUDITH L . -HAMILTON Lonsulting Geologist an-d Engineer GROUND - WATER AND EHNGINEERING G _E _O LOG Y 2951 Curtis Street • D-enver, Colorado • 8_0205 • (303) 296-9467 January 28, 1985 Mr. Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: As you requested, I evaluated the sans, _gravel and quarry aggregate resources on your 1079-acre property in Sections 33 and 34, T2N, -R65W and Sections 2 and 3, T1N, -R65W, Weld County, Colorado. "The Atlas -of Sand, IBravel and Quarry Aggregate Resources, Colorado front Range Counties (Colorado -GeologicalSurvey Special Publication 5-;H, 1974) , -Hudson Quadrangle, does not show any -such resources -0n your property. Although well logs in the area indicate that in the Box Elder Creek Valley some fairly thick gravel zleposits exist, the bedrock contours for your propoerty indicate the -bedrock -channels are -outside the property limits. It is unlikely that thick gravel deposits of sufficient area -extent to be economically mine will be found on your property. If you have -any questions or need -additional -information, please let me know. • j� l li:{po�D te Sincerely, -R).• (/Judith 1.. Hamittoh2,P E. j/ Engineering'Geo si i c co • HYDRO-TRIAD, LTD. January 3, 1985 Mr. Lee Murata Greater Hudson Development c/o Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation to. 80 South 27th Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 Dear Mr. Murata: Thank you for furnishing a copy of your letter dated December 12, 1984 addressed to FRICO requesting certain information and a copy of FRICO's letter dated December 12, 1984 to you stating the Boaro's response . Subsequent to December 12, 1-984, Hydro-Triad, Ltd. had conversations with Mr. Akolt (FRICO' s attorney) -and Mr. Sack. Mr. Akolt indicated te had no objections to Hydro-Tri-ad, ltd. furnishing the information request in your December 12, 1984 letter. Mr. Sack relayed the contents of your December 12 letter to Hydro-Triad, Ltd. by telephone. Mr. Sack indicated any information furnished to you by Hydro-Triad, Ltd. should first be sent to FRICO for review; if found acceptable, FRICO would then forward the information to you. hydro-Triad, Ltd. was instructed to till FRICO for costs involved in furnishing the information . Hydro-Triad, Ltd. understands FRICO will then obtain reimbursement for those costs from you. The information you requested is contained it the following, one copy of which is attached for your use and reference: 1) Table A-1: Inventory of Irrigation Walls in Beebe Draw ( 14 pages) 2) Tab. t A-2: Listing of Irrigation. Well owners in 'Beebe Draw (11 pages) 3) Table A-8: themicai Analysis of Water tram Wells and Test Holes in Beebe -Draw (2 pages) 4) Figure II1-9: Ixisting Irrigation Wells (4 sheets) Please note that the above information pertains to the -alluvial aquifer in Beebe Draw--aid--does not , include data on the bedrock aquifers or alluvial aquifers other--than: the Beebe Draw. -jAN' 4 1985 12687 WEST CEDAR DRIVE-SUITE 100 LAKEWOOD, COI ORADC 80228 PHONE 303 989 123-1 Mr. Lee Murata January 3, 1985 Page 2 On January 2, 1985, you met with Ronald Halley and Steve Schmidt at Hydro-Triad, Ltd. offices to review the above listed information. Per your instructions at that meeting we have -assembled a listing of information per— taining snore specifically to the area adjacent to your proposed development. One copy of this information is enclosed. The information consists of: 1 ) Summary well inventory and water quality data. 2) Irrigation well and proposed development location map, Figure A. The summary well inventory and water quality data (Summary) contains infor- mation on 30 wells located in Beebe Draw within approximately a 2 mile radius of the proposed development. The adjudicated yield for these wells ranges from -500 to 2,200 gpm and averages 1,014 gpm (2.3 ifs) per well (29 -wells) . The volume of water pumped from these wells (as reported to the State Engineer's Office for 1984) ranged from 108 to 850 acre-feet per well and averaged 2.59 acre-feet per well for the 20 wells for -which data are avail-able. These values are indicative of the amount of -water physically available. As a "rule of thumb," these wells are drilled to -bedrock or are terminated in the alluvium above tap of bedrock. For the wells listed, the depth of the well varies from 17 to 87 feet and avera- ges 84.5 feet (29 wells) . These depths should be roughly indicative of the thickness of the alluvium. Of these 30 wells, water quality data are available for 2 wells, both located approximately 1 mile northwest of the northwest corner of the proposed development. The water quality data are included in the Summary. The parame- ters listed can be compared with State Health Department Standards for -suitabil- ity as a public water supply and the need , if any, for supplementary water assessed. As we discussed on January 2, 1985, the enclosed information was developed in connection with -Hydro-Triad, Ltd.' s -work for FRICO. The -work invol-yes engi- neering support for FRICO's claims for water rights now before the Water Court (cases 84-GW-088, 84-CW-089, and 34-CW-09D) . The information is tasic data on the water resources of Beebe Draw -and is a compilation of data publicly available from many different sources. This information has teen made available to you upon FRICO's instructions. Because the information is public record, Hydro-Triad, Ltd. can furnish it to you at FRID.O's direction. However, -Hydro-Triad, Ltd. is not in a position to furnish you engineering analyses and conclusions as to the suit-ability (-either in regard to quality or 'quantity) of the alluvial ground water for the purposes of your proposed development unless authorized by FRICO. The analyses and conclusions are being prepared for FRICO to support their water rights filings 'n the Beebe Draw. As FRICO's interests and your interests in the Beebe I)ra, alluvial aquifer may conflict, Hydra-Triad, Ltd. judges it inappropriate at this time to prepare analyses and conclusions concerning the alluvial aquifer for the purpes s of your development. Mr. Lee Murata January 3, 1985 Page 3 This letter has been sent to you in care of FRICO, thus conforming to FRICO's reluirement that T'RICO review the data you request tefore the data is sent to you. We trust this letter and the attachments meet your needs. Please call should you have questions. Sincerely, HYDRO-TRIAD, LTD. L. Stephen Schmidt, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer LSS/cl Enclosures cc: Albert Sack (with enclosures) John P. Akolt, III (with enclosures) #219 THE FARMERS RESERVOIR AND IRRIGATION COMPANY BO SOUTH 27TH AVENUE BRIGHTON COLORADO 80601 PHONE 659 7313 December 12, 1984 Mr. Lee Murata Hudson Colorado Dear Mr. Murata: Your request for another letter from FRICO stating that we will cooperate with you regarding your development plans; your request that 60 shares of Lupton Bottom water be transferred up river and run down into Barr Lake; and your request for information on ground water in the Beebe Draw aquifer was presented to the Board of Directors at their meeting of November 29, 1984. The following motions were made regarding these matters: "A motion was made by Director DiNatale and seconded by Director Ludwig to send a letter to Mr. Murata stating that FRICO will consider acceptance of their development plans as long as these plans are in conformance with FRICO criteria. He is also to be informed that FRICO thinks an upstream transfer of their Lupton Bottom stock would be very difficult and possibly that they should consider an exchange. All in favor." "A motion was made by Director DiNatale and seconded by Director Hajj to inform Mr. Murata that he can have this information under the following conditions: He must submit a list of -information r-equested to be approved by FRICO's attorney and that if approved, we will advise him of the cost of this information. All in favor except Director Dechant who is opposed." Yours truly, c _jA' H at A Albert F. Sack President AFS:csf DENVER Alpha F0857 2308 N 573-5186 Enq neerinq Cf P.O. 80X 392 617 5" STREET FORT LUPTON COLORADO. 80621 February 22, 1985 James R. Mayerl Weld County Dept of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE : Traffic Study Impact Dear Mr, Mayerl : 1 . Location: Parcel I: The East one-half (Et) of Section 33. Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel II: The Northwest quarter (NWT) of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel III: The North half (N4) of Section 3, Township 1 North, ?.ange 65 West of the 6th P.M. Parcel IV: The South half (Sty) of Section 311, Township 2 North, uange 65 West of the 6th P.M. 2 . Present land use is agriculture . The change requested is for commercial and residential . 3. The highway access is noted on the map as to the category it represents . The overpass on I-76 and Highway 52 allows for excellent access to service roads . Old Highway 52 or Road 121 has 2 accesses with well designed exits from Highway 52 . (See map A & B) The whole length of County Road 121 borders the project site to the south. This road is category 5, 30 mph controlled service road. The service road off I-76 is very well designed to accomodate any service necessary for the project . There are two access points off of this service road. (See map C & D) The service road can be controlled to 50 mph speed limit and would not be necessary for deacceleration driveways for a good many years . Signal lights are not necessary . This service road is category 4 . No special one ways are nec- essary to and from the project site . As a safety factor on the two access points (F & A of the map) , off of Highway 52 a deacceleration lane on and off would be necessary . In my opinion, the improvement necessary to upgrade all the road features to meet County standards is not a major problem. The engineer who designed the I-76 service road with the County Road 12?z did forsee the future use of the roads for a development . TRAFFIC STUDY IMPACT C0N'T Page 2 3 . Roads : A . I-76 servic-e road is of asphalt construction in very good condition. B. Road 121 is of asphalt surface in fair condition. It has an excellent base because it was formerly the old route for Highway 52. This road meets the service road for I-76 at the east point of the project . As the -pro- ject develops and population increases make it necessary for another access to the project, the old Highway 52 or Cedar Street to the north of I-76 service road is an ideal place for an access . Full development of the project may be 10 years assuming first year construction would be 2_00 homes with 2 vehicles per residence . This makes a total of 400 vehicles and if each vehicle moves twice a day it would be a count of 800 . The 1982 survey has a count of 2350 on Highway 5-2 . Assuming a well developed shopping center would be built to draw from a 15 mile radius, a possible count of 3000 to 5000 should be considered . One to five year growth with similar expansion would put the count at approximately 1-0,000 . The following imformation was obtained from the Brighton City Engineer, Mr. Robert Sandquist : A. The average daily traffic count in 1978 was 15,000 . B. The average daily traffic count in 1982 was 20,000 . C. Todays count could be up 20% from the last survey . Bridge Street is an East - West artery for the City of Brighton. The streets measure 142 feet wide form I-85 to 12 Street East . By -comparison to the load on Highway 7, or Bridge Street, there should not te any impeding of traffic to this project with the present established roads . The planned access to the project includes the feature of a security system to residential sites . A large access system would make it more practical for the control of security . Any design and planning is subject to change as new innovation of construction develops . Yours truly, C f2t / /l , Cecil R. Crowe F .E . & L.S . 12330 _ - HUDSON QUADRANGLE COLORADO MILTON LAKE .w r°.a... 7.5 MINUTE SERIES(TOPOGRAPHIC) / i•n (MIL IOM RESERVOIR? I" wa'21 rod ,•M . 224000°f(EI _ Ell 104'3/'3( J _- J / SI) 2Pe. (N ql• c: 21� • o�) S �Vr, / �� `,oD 23 17' I n e , •� all I 14 10 U_a i5 .. R VIIIi u A0. 12 V2 ., «p 1 0 n f Q 0 0 doa<'.Cb •Y4` as ad aam. r1.• o / D" ,� ` r<lto>"/ •� s+ « ..t'.;/°S / ( sarw. C.vRD. l ..1_ . .a«L,�' - —,tD'.�:/ { wa t„.?. r rrn l l\' 1' `�" I , ' ,11., 1 F III•3 °� i, 21� 1 l I 1 1 °\ �v `` I _\()o ,' a' I •,, » , �1_ 3s �- AM12Vz � u ••:iI. } l r� \ I. 1 A I —1141: . g - ea uid Ruwwv Lu—' No Vd MI• IN . kw amTh X s -ll ¢Ya4Rn -D l� O (1 of 1' COLO. RWr S2 4 2 4 -1,• _ a� W a I; RD 12 V_ -jSi 6 -d� u.� TIa♦ •FRrl Lupien • �. p• s', ,45 ' ' D o.4K ,y. CE 41 ` I �'fqb 1 e • CATEGORY C . - —• • DO.12 V2 • ` ' � Ilu•- 11 110. 12 V2 Or o 5.24/• S N'YY :�.. ! t- 0 ad ARK O? «ar 1 O sell )1 • • 6 A ft .96 1 , ;f.: 4 if j 1 1 t. << ��., �-- 1,� '1 --` `' EXISTING ACCESSES TO PROPOSED �l I I I , I HUDSON GARDEN VILLAGE P.U.D. 41 ___ --__ r"1—mac __— _ v - 3 It\cvv , • • Iti j7m '2S -a UN a M O P C I,tm I ee,e colene O,,,-;;;-10s i 5 L j 00 \Is / W C l OI o owr�n. `11Lg�_' ' O Ault „m 1.a, ,.a. I �I:m GIB, I . IL..— o \.m- I e eis � .a I\ b5 B. �,eW a 2 w' Tem O2542 O FID 3.00 /e1550 G,eeI.y 'Stet— .Ytly I.W\ • L I µl O Lw. Is.W 101W©jO.tl". \ ' M I Ma .II-1 \ — K.r dam ,l y,� �,n a Sall* .i 50 10,,„_- 050 O°S°m Millhen 10,0 4 ' o0 -. B.nKw,E 0 RIM „„ m ,e«e[4Nm I EC 33901 I I "..""p" 950 .050 I 0400 /I� Mm /ISO I PI.11e.Ale I �iSOm m �Ofm O Lo.Pmw I I _\ 16 mI ® .I In.m „SP Ct\ P Kn n.0 um\ \ 1210 WI laaccoa 9 •50oI° u �� P.n,„,,„9NWm ® I alm ZI CJ!"; a D ; "C° aI m/I. �.a.t,.I /na IM. � _—_.OM___ Tr —;lir 30 \ h 000 ADAMS w La.n..n. \ Brighton`l \ 1,Iml ,.1m IMOD—, .,m .100 sw«.« x I1um Im�01m 16 Canon°City moo 50 <.m B,mmiiew III Nenabm. Q\ / 'ON ,t, .,a V — M.mom a 8000 • tl\ 1 Et_"NEC t .S philter) \ NWI s° m be,al 11sm. CA ..Pr, •rmm,,,m zs.00—now n t9 mom,«• .e w Pm 6,stm Pw 1 m ' , IIIm n 30Gom°arnp I LAS A N I•.etm o t.—_♦ .m I.. ▪ er � II tl _i� I]M M �� N� 1.nn mllTf / ADAMS " , Le•� W .0550 �bP. m A D A M 5 ss w.kn�' m a ¢E 1almo A P A P A N O E 15 .:��L. .n "I If 'I'm O'n.m _� /Jw I L.>, © me,,,,01. 1 111 srm I Ln a « ©L L,w •Lw l HMO r , 3.477 r,. .� [n.1e �`• m —u.m O I°nwn 2,,,,,,dad .�'./ '" •-. 171 '_ wl,atnl�Il� ®vmm"I r�e I ea ar'.t'na l T Co1 m�we, « a w G°m wood ,a, ` .r O \ —IsaO r... —V.II• IOs s o m ln t —,lino eep 1 en_ 1 Ot0000 :: e 1,_"" 1710055 _--_tl _ _ A P_A P _ 't o it-.7 1sT Iwo _5170 D O ll G l ♦ S _I ELBERT DENVER-FORT COLLINS AREA TRINIDAD A f r BOOR Recorded o'clock LJ_.M MAR 7 197A f /.� 621 15/,3196 Rec. No d, '1 Ann Sooner, Records \ 1 ADD OLD STATE HIGHWAY #52 WITHIN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1, RANGE 65 TO COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM, #12.5; O C ye) WHEREAS, the State Highway Department by resolution 142-D, approved November 18, 1969, abandoned a portion of old State Highway #52, and N• I WHEREAS, the Board believes it to be in the best interests for the safety and welfare of the public to retain that portion of State Highway #52 within the boundaries of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the • 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, as a County public highway. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board Df County Commissioner • of Weld County, Colorado, that the aforementioned portion of State Highway #52 be and it is hereby added to the County Road System and to be known as County c,- Road #12.5. r- `�' The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and • seconded, adopted by the following vote: G-' AYES: .,V .(!ll '/ THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 1970 � THE L cVC lvt, v, l'.'% , , LL rok Su tilt T ll0 I3� .Ca F I Sub 1'C hip I_d GREELEY OFFICE 33:3% P.O. BOX 759 Fr I 'iNI UN,I 006.-I GREELEY,CO 80632 Pi ti'r ,_ (.-')-:4 3SL t 'U0 EXl teal PHONE(303)356-4000 HAROLD L. ANDREWS "0',ey .'4,1` December 11, 1984 Mr, Lee Muratta Greater Hudson Development Co. 13877 Hwy. 52 Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Muratta, I pave your information concerning a residential development near Hudson to my Staff personnel responsible for preparing law enforcement cost estimates for the Weld County Planning Department. Generally, a rezoning request is first filed with the Planning Department who subsequently contacts my Department for cost and impact analysis to be presented to the Planning Commission. For that reason, I could not be more specific at the time of our earlier conversation. Your proposal for Phase I of a residential development eventually totalling about 1,000 homes would represent a considerable impact upon law enforcement. U.S. Bureau of Census figures indicate average occupancy of a rural residence is 3. 12, and a population of over 3,000 people would he projected for your proposal . That would literally represent creation of a small city. U.S. Department of Justice average sworn officer per thousand figures indicate that for a suburban county, the staff should he 1.9 officers. Your project would eventually involve the commitment of 5.7 officers. Our present costs of administration, supervision, insurance, training, clerical support, salaries, and operational expense have been carefully calculated on an hourly basis per sworn officer at $17. per hour. Your project appears to require an estimated $200,000. annually in law enforcement costs at build-out. Because of the property tax limitations within the County, it would be highly unlikely that the t-ax base in your project would support law enforcement expenses as well as other County services. I would, therefore, recommend you evaluate the possibility of forming Law Enforcement Authority for your project which would assess additional property tax to he used exclusively for law enforcement. I am not taking a position for or against your proposal. In view of the size of your project, I'm sure you realize that considerable expense is necessary to supply adequate service. Planning for less would not he appropriate eventually leaving citizens dissatisfied with the level of service and the Sheriff frustrated because more service cannot he delivered. A law enforcement authority which creates necessary funding from a special taxation district would appear to solve many issues. I hope this information is helpful and that I may be of future assistance. Sincerely, SHERIFF HAROLD L. ANDREWS HLA/kc :a: e I. • off' (C@,PIeinud!m • Pt AfTE VALt EY DIVISION p P.O BOY 158 FNRldriirnA t.J; (uI {;O 8(K;01 DOCCIdle' N, 19ri S Mr. Lee Murata 13877 Colorado 11w: 52 Fort Lupton, Co. ;;U0.' 1 To Whom It May Concern : Section _ .tnd Section 3; T,Iwn;:;lip I orti.; Nau,', b`) We,A ; a,ud Secti.)r: 33, 34 , and '35; Townr,hip ._ Korth; R.tu✓t• h5 W ;L are wit nil' the ole,-trle service territory .:t Rat.)! it. Sery L•e Com Ank ul C,I.)ra,l..,. Electric ',el:vice would he .Iv.li.l.11,le in lhi'; area ,uUje. t I ,. the terms and t'ondit ion:; of Po' I i . .�rrvl.'r lt'iii j l• 1., I IL', I rlr I li,.f I hurt lull 1'.:,Lt•il- signPolicy and subieet t.I the of the appropriate colutruct ion payment . If you hive any IIIIeAI ioo,' J1 It I coo he „I II11lnt'r help feel true CO contact me. ,. 1-t: I y /.. It :; A. Fraley LAF: tr Planned Unit I) vclopment Plan AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD TILE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. I �/lC( {e ( 9 X/ 1i The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this ,7 day / li , 1911 / WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: �4 �.-?4 r22 . (Z.. l ,./ Notary Public NAM OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 5' FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR' S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION GITTLEIN FRANK G JR 5952 WCR 41 FT LUPTON CO 80621 1307 33 0 00 004 NELSON RAY C 6694 HWY 2 SP6 COMMERCE CITY CO 80022 1307 33 0 00 003 ALLEN FRANK ETAL 90 CORONA DENVER CO 80218 1307 28 0 00 011 HALLER CHARLES & ID1AGENE 20600 WCR 18 FT LUPTON CO 80621 1307 28 0 00 012 ROLAND W L ETAL %A A DIEL 7863 FLIGHT AVE LOS ANGFLFS CA 90045 1307 28 0 00 001 GILJJJ IN FRANK SR ETAL 5952 WCR 41 FT LUPTON CO 80621 1473 04 0 00 001 PS76tilERS ROBERT TORN FTAL 14 2 4 4 5 AVF C' T FY R fl 14 _.._, 13 0 7 27 0 00 010 ZEHNDER RUDOLPH R JR BOX 29280 DENVER CO 80229 1473 04 0 00 031 T,EF DAVID L & JULIA I BOX 92 HUDSON CO 80642 1473 04 0 00 029 HUDSON SANITATION DISTRICT HUDSON CO 80642 1473 03 0 00 027 OTTESEN BETTY J & WARNER BILL U" C-32 BOX 34-B SANTA FE N M 87501 1473 03 0 00 026 r HUDSON SANITATION DISTRICT HUDS00N CO 80642 1473_03 0 00 024 KRAUSE RALPH E & MARILYN Y 6700 ONEIDA COMMERCE CITY CO 80022 1473 03 4 17 001 FRITCHLE CO ETAL 1980 E BELLEVIEW CT LITTLETON CO 80121 1473 03 4 00 002 CONWAY ERNEST N & MARIA F 200 S BRYANT DENVER CO 80219 1473 02 0 02 001 CECIL T,FF A & LINANEL D BOX 163 HUDSON CO 80642 1473 02 0 03 001 MASDEN LlOWEI,L BOX 364 HUDSON CO 80642 1473 02 0 01 001 STATE FO COLA DEPT OF HIGHWAYS 4201 E ARKANSAS DENVER CO 80222 1473 02 0 00 003 TETER ARNOLD DOUGLAS & BEVERLY ANN BOX 251 HUDSON CO 80642 1473 02 0 00 002 MC GILL JOHN L 22461 I-76 ACCESS RD HUDSON CO 80642 1473 02 0 00 012 EICHTHALER MARGARET L 617 CO RD 511 IGNACIO CO 81137 1305 35 0 00 002 WALDBAUM MILTON G CO OF COLO BOX 429 HUDSON CO 80642 1305 35 0 00 003 • t5 OFFICE OF COUNTY ATiOHNtY PHONE(3 W)356-4000 EXT361 P BOA 19494tl GREELEY,COLORADO 60h3i C. COLORADO December 7 , 1984 Lee Murata 13877 Highway 52 Ft. Lupton, CO 80261 Dear Mr. Murata: From the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder ' s Office, it appears that Weld County holds mineral interests in the North- west Quarter (NW4) of Section 2 , Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. The Weld County Attorney' s Office makes no repre- sentation as to other persons who may own mineral interests in the same quarter section. In no way does Weld County warrant title to the mineral interests it owns in said quarter section. Very truly yours, 1)'.G I --1—) " " - -- Bruce T. Barker Assistant Weld County Attorney BTB: ss AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property Ny Sec. 3. TIN. R65W; NW1A Sec, 2. TIN. R65W; 515 Sec. 34, T2N, R65W; and E% Sec. 33, T2N, R65W STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract -company or an attorney. QQ--'ILO Lf l \' V:-10 Aline M. Pike The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this not / day of \' &&) , 19 5 By a\', NE_ r'1 r. F— WITNESS my hard and official seal . My Commission expires : Exiues Nov.3U.134 , a/64 Notary Public ft1iNcrc2 NAMES OFAOWNERS Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR' S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # 915 10th Street Weld County, Colorado Greeley, CO 80631 Clara E. , Wallace G. , Box 164 Clara Pauline & Harold C.W. YOUNG Hudson, CO 80642 c/o Phyllis Campbell Dahl J. W. Campbell 3670 Chamber Rd.- Aurora , CO Ellen C. Carwin c/o Phillip A. Reubel Lawrence V. Reubel c/o Phillip A. Reubel 275 S. Third Ave. Phillip A. Reubel Brighton, CO 80601 Marguerite P. Mayer Will Hollingsworth A. C. Hollingsworth r r ?au. iar ./ Ct,a+.as Denver M.Wiggins STEWART TITLE (303) 352.45,1 President OF GREELEY 916 10th Street Cleona M.Nelson Greeley,Colorado 80631 Executive Vice President In obtaining the addresses of the mineral owners for Mr. Murata, I was unable to locate an address for Marguerite P. Mayer, Will Hollingsworth, and A. C. Hollingsworth. These three people obtained their interest before it was required to show addresses on the deeds. Also they have not recorded any documents (leases, mortgages , etc. ) on this property that might give me an address. I also checked the assessors tax roll and did not find these names. Dated February 28, 1985 Aline M. Pike Abstracter Title Memo Specialist u �� _nH� I _ .)—t, ‘1 J� Uft_L, . Y ,. AL . BBP SEC. . TY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WE COUNTY 916 TENTH STREET GREELEY , COLORADO 80631 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY / CERTIFICATE # 5838 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : See attached Page 2 (NW' 2-1-65) Except Railroad and Highway Rights of Way. ( EXCEPT RESERVOIRS , IRRIGATION DITCHES , AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF ROADS ) RECORD TITLE OWNER : See attached Page 2 MINERAL OWNERS : PARCELS A,C,D: Weld County, Colorado PARCEL B: John F. Warren and Dora W. Warren PARCEL B1 : Colorado Department of Highways OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM : See attached Page 3 ENCUMBRANCES : 1684621 TD 3/30/76 E & C Young, Inc. to The First Bank & Trust Company of Brighton - $90,000.00 (Parcel A) THIS STATEMENT IS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF Greater Hudson Development THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TO I3E CONSIDERED AN OPINION AND WE ASSUME NO FINANCIAL LIABILITY BY VIRTUE THEREOF . IN TESTAMONY WHEREOF WE SIGN THIS STATEMENT AS OF THE 31st DAY OF January, 1984 AT 7 : 45 A . M . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY BY __L1c -G'1_l . Ij Q-1 NOTE : ALL RECORDING DATA PERTAINS TO THE CLERK AND RECORDER ' S OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY 916 Tenth Street Greeley, Culnrrido 80631 1-303-3D2-4571 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY i CERTIFICATE # 5838 PAGE 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: The Northwest Quarter (NWq) of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado; EXCEPT Parcels B, B1 ,C and D PARCEL B: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE',NW') of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , described as follows : Beginning at a point which is 268.24 feet west, and 30 feet north of the intersection of the south line of the NWq and the center line of the C.B.& Q. Railroad; running thence N 49017' E along the West right poi of nt; thenceline Northf tj;e State 89'02' WestH545way teetoto81 a a podint;ance thencf ce SO049�17eetW a 600 feet to a point; thence South 89 02' East on a line which is 30 feet North of and parallel with the South line of said NW', 545 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. EXCEPT Parcel B1 PARCEL 81 : That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , described as follows : Commencing at the intersection of the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 and the center line of the C.B.&Q. Railroad, thence West along the said South line 268.24 feet; thence North 30 feet, thence North 49 17 ' East along the West right of way line of State Highway No. 81 , a distance of 275 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 49°17' East along theoWest right of way line of said highway, 325 feet; thence North 89 2 minutes, West 200 feet; thence South 49 17' West 325 feet; thence South 89'2' East 200 feet, to the point of beginning. PARCEL C: That part of the Northwest Quarter (NWa) of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado , lying between Interstate Highway 80 South, formerly U.S. Highway 6 as described in Deed recorded in Book 1338 at Page 54 of the Weld County Records and the present service road being the former U.S. Highway No. 6, as described in Deed recorded in Book 967 at Page 462 of the Weld County Records excepting therefrom a certain tract described in Book 986 at Page 420 of the Weld County Records PARCEL D: That part of the Northwest Quarter (NW' ) of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, described as: Beginning at the North one-quarter corner of said Section 2, thence S00 00' 00"W along the East line of said Northwest Quarter Section 2, a distance of 587.65 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing S00 00'00"W along said East line, a distance of 654.36 feet to a point on he Northerly R.O.W. line of the service road for Interstate 76; thence S54 48'40"1 along said Northerly R.O.W. line, a distance of 636.28 feet; thence N00 00'00"E parallel to said gast line Northwest Quarter a distance of 1021.03 feet; thence N90 00'00"E, a distance of 520.00 feet to the true point of beginning. RECORD TITLE OWNERS: PARCEL A: Clara E. Young 50.5264%; Wallace G. Young 16.4912%; Clara Pauline Young 16.4912%; and Harold C. W. Young 16.4912% PARCEL B: John F. Warren and Dora W. Warren PARCEL 81 : Colorado Department of Highways PARCEL C: Arnold Douglas Teter and Beverly Ann Teter PARCEL D: 2/3- Estate of Edward Kerbs; and 1/3 John T. Maley SECURITY ABUTSECT COMPANI OF 'WELD CUULlI 916 Tenth Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 1-303- 352-4571 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY .7 CERTIFICATEN 5838 PAGE 3 OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM: 1544551 OGL 2/21/70 Earl E. Young, and Clara E. Young to T. S. Pace - 10 yrs. 1799545 OGL 8/1/79 Weld County, Colorado to Double Eagle Petroleum and Mining Company - 5 yrs. 1909504 OGL 10/30/82 John F. Warren, individually and as heir of Dara W. Warren and Maxine U. Warren to Macey & Mershon Oil Inc. - 1 yr. 1909508 OGL 11/8/82 Arnold Douglas Teter and Beverly Ann Teter to Macey & Mershon Oil Inc. - 1 yr. 1903798 OGL 9/9/82 Clara E. Young, Wallace G. Young and Maxine L. Young, Clara Pauline Young and Harold C. W. Young to Macey & Mershon Oil Inc. - 1 yr. 1572094 OGL 4/23/71 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company to Bel Oil , Inc. - 5 yrs. 1763910 AFFID. LEASE EXT. 8/10/78 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1544551 1885956 AFFID. PRODUCTION 3/11/82 Sun Exploration and Production Company - affects OGL 1572094 1912056 DECL. POOLING 11/10/82 W. B. Macey and Paul M. Mershon, et al - affects OGL's 1799545, 1903798,1909504 and 1909508 1917261 AFFID. PRODUCTION 2/10/83 William B. Collister - affects OGL 1572094 and rerecorded under Reception No. 1923401 1964341 AFFID. PRODUCTION 4/4/84 James A. Brown - affects OGL's 1799545, 1903798, 1909504 and 1909508 :AA LUY'i\ VY OF GREELLY , INC . DBA SECS .TY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WE.. COUNTY 916 TENTH STREET GREELEY , COLORADO 80631 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY CERTIFICATE # 5839 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : The East Half (E') of Section 33, Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. EXCEPT Railroad Right of Way ( EXCEPT RESERVOIRS , IRRIGATION DITCHES , AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF ROADS ) RECORD TITLE OWNER: Clara E. Young 50.5264%; Wallace G. Young 16.4912%; Clara Pauline Young 16.4912%; -Harold C. W. Young 16.4912% MINERAL OWNERS : 1/6 - J. W. Campbell 1/9 - Ellen C. Carwin 1/9 - Philip A. Ruebel 1/9 - Lawrence V. Ruebel 1/6 - A. C. Hollingsworth 1/6 - Will Hollingsworth 1/6 - Marguerite P. Mayer OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM : See attached Page 2 ENCUMBRANCES : None of record THIS STATEMENT IS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF Greenwood Resources , Inc. THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN OPINION AND WE ASSUME NO FINANCIAL LIABILITY BY VIRTUE THEREOF . IN TESTAMONY WHEREOF WE SIGN THIS STATEMENT AS OF THE 31st DAY OF January_, 1985__ . AT 7 : 45 A . M . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY BY ' k L_1_ 1 ,t C' Aline M. flke NOTE : ALL RECORDING DATA PERTAINS TO THE CLERK, AND RECORDER ' S OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY 916 Tenth Street Greeley, Culcrado 80631 1-303-352-4571 • MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY j) CERTIFICATE # 5839 PAGE 2 OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM: 1559065 OGL 11/5/70 _Elsie I. Smith, sole heir of William Hollingsworth, deceased to Pan American Petroleum Corporation - 5 yrs. 1559066 OGL 10/28/70 Phillip A. Ruebel , individually and as attorney in fact for Lawrence V. Ruebel and Ellen C. Carwin, being the sole heirs of Philip Ruebel , deceased to Pan American Petroleum Corporation - 5 yrs. 1559067 OGL 11/5/70 Lyda Hollingworth Schrodt and Joyce C. Putallez to Pan American Petroleum Corporation - 5 yrs. 1559068 OGL 11/5/70 Doris Campbell Smith, Phyllis Campbell Dahl , James B. Campbell , and Louis T. Campbell only heirs of J. W. Campbell , deceased to Pan American Petroleum Corporation - 5 yrs. 1559069 OGL 11/9/70 Rodney Bell to Pan American Petroleum Corporation - 5 yrs. 1572094 OGL 4/23/71 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company to Bel Oil Corporation - 5 yrs. 1680137 LEASE EXT. 1/30/76 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1559065 1680138 LEASE EXT. 1/30/76 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1559066 1680139 LEASE EXT. 1/30/76 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1559067 1680140 LEASE EXT. 1/30/76 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1559068 1680141 LEASE EXT. 1/30/76 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1559069 1885956 AFFID. PRODUCTION 3/11/82 Sun Exploration and Production Company - affects OGL 1572094 1917261 AFFID. PRODUCTION William B. Collister - affects OGL 1572094 STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF GREELEY , INC . DBA SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELu COUNTY 916 TENTH STREET GREELEY , COLORADO 80631 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY CERTIFICATE # 5840 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : The North Half (N;) of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. ( EXCEPT RESERVOIRS , IRRIGATION DITCHES , AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF ROADS ) RECORD TITLE OWNER: Clara E. Young 50.5264%; Wallace G. Young 16.4912%; Clara Pauline Young 16.4912% and Harold C. W. Young 16.4912% MINERAL OWNERS : Same as Record Title Owners OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM : 1572094 OGL 4/23/71 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company to Bel Oil Co. - 5 yrs . 1544551 OGL 2/21/70 Earl E. Young and Clara E. Young to T. S. Pace - 10 yrs. 1763910 LEASE EXT. 8/10/78 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1544551 1385956 AFFID. PRODUCTION 3/11/82 Sun Exploration and Production Company - affects OGL 1572094 1917261 AFFID. PRODUCTION 2/10/83 William B. Collister - affects OGL 1572094 (rerecorded under Reception No. 1923401) ENCUMBRANCES : 1684621 Deed of Trust 3/26/76 E. & C. Young, Inc. to The First Bank & Trust Company of Brighton - $90,000.00 THIS STATEMENT IS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF Greater Hudson Development THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN OPINION AND WE ASSUME NO FINANCIAL LIABILITY BY VIRTUE THEREOF . IN TESTAMONY WHEREOF WE SIGN THIS STATEMENT AS OF THE 31st DAY OF January , 19 85 AT 7 : 45 A . M . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY BY e Aline M. Pike NOTE : ALL RECORDING DATA PERTAINS TO THE CLERK, AND RECORDER ' S OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO . STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF GREELEY . INC . DBA SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELu COUNTY 916 TENTH STREET GREELEY , COLORADO 80631 MEMORANDUM OF TITLE OF MINERALS ONLY CERTIFICATE # 5841 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : The South Half (Sz) of Section 34, Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. EXCEPT a 200 foot strip across the SE' as described in document recorded in Book 1254 Page 419. ( EXCEPT RESERVOIRS , IRRIGATION DITCHES , AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF ROADS ) RECORD TITLE OWNER: Clara E. Young 50. 5264%; Wallace G. Young 16.4912%; Clara Pauline Young 16.4912%; and Harold C. W. Young 16.4912% MINERAL OWNERS : Same as Record Title Owners OIL & GAS LEASES CURRENT AS TO PRIMARY TERM : 1572094 OGL 4/23/71 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company to Bel Oil Co. - 5 yrs. 1544551 OGL 2/21/70 Earl E. Young and Clara E. Young to T. S. Pace - 10 yrs. 1763910 LEASE EXT. 8/10/78 Amoco Production Company - extends OGL 1544551 1748842 DECLAR. POOLING 3/27/78 Amoco Production Company - affects OGL 1544551 1885956 AFFID. PRODUCTION 3/11/82 Sun Exploration and Production Company - affects OGL 1572094 1917261 AFFID. PRODUCTION 2/10/83 William B. Collister - affects OGL 1572094 (rerecorded under Reception No. 1923401) ENCUMBRANCES : 1684621 Deed of Trust 3/26/76 E & C Young, Inc. to The First Bank & Trust Comapny of Brighton - $90,000.00 1987869 LIS PENDENS 11/2/84 Clara E. Young, Wallace G. Young, Clara Pauline Young and Harold C. W. Young vs. Hattie Williams and all unknown persons who may claim an interest in SEa - also recorded under -Reception No. 1989264 THIS STATEMENT IS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF Greater Hudson Development THIS STATEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AN OPINION AND WE ASSUME NO FINANCIAL LIABILITY BY VIRTUE THEREOF . IN TESTAMONY WHEREOF WE SIGN THIS STATEMENT AS OF THE 31st DAY OF January , 19 85 . AT 7 : 45 A . M . SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OF WELD COUNTY B Y (7_x At G � t O< U ATTne Li. Ike NOTE : ALL RECORDING DATA PERTAINS TO THE CLERK AND RECORDER ' S OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO . If 4 K poo FE8 2 4 1981 �I L1 it . i ' BOn Record-• t 4.. *desk- a S' ' At.s '1 Rey yt.. do iri3 0361-. _ _ _• �.saad.r. ' i stn Mang # THIS DICED, Nth. thb 8th day d t 4 ; I October d the year d!mr Lard ass thousand nine bated gad eighty banef I X _Si D YOUNG, ?NC., a Loloradc corporation k .. . E., a4.epavetho ddywp.ised and existing rearad4ty arra dihe law of m.glt.t.of -Colorado at th.lb.rpsrt,W f. e lava E. Young, Wallaceia . Young, Clara Pauline # Young and Harold C. W. Young, as tenants-in- j t. common i; r !.; of the Cr of Weld and Stated !. .k?.. xolorado dw sad part. , WITNESSITH, hat the said party of the a ant part,for-and in maintain of the sus ad ' • c TEN DOLlaRs AND DTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION — DOLLARS. in to the said pony of tM2bn pan_la-bad pad by tb.s.idiwart Y -445 mar part,the receipt whereof b herby in touted and fir nowbdged,bath Yrnd•d,beg=sold ad oosnyd,an bc. rse these pre data grant,bargain, O all,earn and confirm pate the said part iesy the...end-part. their Min,and assigns forever, all of Oa following dacrlbed lot or parcel of land,estate,lying and ban bib* Comity of Weld and State of Colorado,tart: !t ' ., '+' SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND 44ADHt -A -FART HEREOF. The interest of the grantees in -said cn descried 4-property -e as -follows:L. Clara E. Young - 50.5264% },,,, . Willace0 . Young - 16,4912% Clara Pauline Young - 16,4912% Harold C. W. Yocag - 16,4912% p1 TOOETHIal with all d a Woolsr the hwedltasr d t. a apprutasa ss tbeaato bangle, Dram and= apparlarg,�Rsb. reversion or reversions. redder Tall, Saes ad p.ata tbn..l7 sat all Y.adds, right, L ands tb..above bsrgalyd pnesb..-with the I a.Nha Sts wed apprtreser. part.sidle ta law spa wpdep ad dm ., -TO NAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises rove-bargained sdles.rWd,sIth Wyppsrlraa.n rats the sew pan 1.115 of tits near pan, their -Min sail assigns forever.-Aad ti aid I p i E & C Young, Inc. party d the fug net.Mr Ralf. I P 5 ad lb aoxsa ews,dot►tenant,gnat, bargain,anagram to sad with the said part iss of-the..esadga* •f 1h,-�++r Mfrs and antra,OW at the tlrt[Jbe eas.aSae-W dsSven d those presto It basil I .di:Taite premises above earsy.d,as eta-good.sae., .Wet.sad ..Aahad Yh.dOaa,ia law,la fee lrah and bath good rift,toll pewr+ad lawful sabafty to An at. d sag soli ad fang Us.Ras innsan=�sad llatar.sarll.a th sost semi eni fur aJw adm s all aerfar sad idl drank b.rgaima.Ian al E general -taxes ;pyq for 1980 payable in 1981, bG1 tp : • 'f*. and the above leRlrd pse.3sr b the�iim sad ps.abb pure are part tea al the wrysat. � , y p their wow assigrathathat all sad every parrs.e we .g�idl.w.�.i. r any part thsnot bs said tarty d iso ant part shall s -11, AND DVPP.-r414L•,r 2. �d amen wmaO,,The aid piety etgrad pan bath sasasd m.seapaaW .M titer' i I seraed b Its heldsat•r ibJsepseass sal a ho-iraa%dmsd.atria b its fbaats17,the day and yar first then walla 3 i r 1' + t y. Attest: - /// -- Td '. a fram, fL.."+..t.. '/'-_•u:a� ' - _ r d 1 STATE OF COLORADO, '•sees I. y la_ --Gnat' _ Adams Adamsk' 1 II TMf.ngand Wet trrt au aanowbigdideae meals lath are Ovaeber �' 1980 r►'.- is 'roamers , ✓ iwYgd r, 6 NynWWr�Y-_ //-,j2. •••• iN as'� mobs my had sal nil seal f,��& o . e fie :✓aa. 1,Xf X rake p 11 1 7 t . p � -I ° goo" 928 r, 185036] I YA .F { I EXHIBIT A 'f,it;xti A', d "" I The East 1/2 of Section 33, Township 2 North, i Range 65 West of the 6th P. M. , excepting the l " right-of-way of the Beebe Canal, and except all minerals, oil and gas _underlying the afore- I said land. The NW 1/4 of Section 2 Township 1 vw , ; North, Range 65 West of the 6th P. M. , except a tract of approximately 5 acres conveyed by deed recorded in Book 1000 at Page 256, Weld County I records; except also highway right-of-way, and , except also 10 acres in the S. E. corner of the `t NW 1/2 of Section 2 which was sold to Front It Range, The N 1/2 of Section 3, Township 1 North, d Range 65 W. of the 6th P. N. ; The S 1/2 of Section I 34, Township 2 North, Range 65 W. of the 6th P.M. , I more or less, together with all minerals, oil and gas underlying said lands and including all '1, it water and water rights, ditch sights, reservoir a. y y and reservoir rights, rights-of—way for water, ' F';!. ditches and reservoirs and all enlargements and extensions thereof, including irrigation wells and all shares of capital stock in any irrigation Vy company, including Farmers Reservoir & Irriga- 1", '' N tion Co. and Henrylyn Irrigation -District and all right-s Sn and to the Ireland Reservoir, together t �?. .__ with any oil and gas 1 and rights to use any %"� 1of -said natural gas and gas wells for their own use.II aka fl 10- The interest of the grantees in said described a jlands is as follows: 1 Clara E. Young 50.5264% " Wallace G. Young 16,4912% Clara Pauline Young 16,4912% 7k °a I Harold C. W. Young 16,4912% ig' , fa. li { 7i., I ` P rY rt Y• i:):'I,' ,� n t s t V-, S� lF W I : ADDRESSES Wallace Young P.O. Box 164 Hudson, CO 80642 Nautica Development Co . 8607 Warzbach Road Suite A San Antonio, Texas 782-40 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: March 26, 1985 CASE NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 NAME: Greater Hudson Development Company ADDRESS: c/o Lee Murata, 13877 Highway 52, Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parts of Sections 33 and 34, 'I2N, and parts of Sections 2 and 3, TIN, all in R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent and north of Hudson town limits; north of State Highway 52 and I-76, East of Weld County Road 41. SIZE OF PARCEL: 1 ,089 acres POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review are listed -in Section 28.3 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning -Ordinance. Please find a ropy of this zoning ordinance -section in your case summary packet. The applicant has not adequately addressed the issue of traffic impacts, road improvements and road maintenance as they relate in a Change of Zone to a Planned Unit Development District. A copy of Section 28.3. 1 . 1.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the referral comments from the Weld County Engineering Department are -enclosed. Residential growth policies of Weld County are listed on pages 59 and 60 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Town of Hudson is in opposition to the proposed rezoning and would -encourage the applicant to file a completed petition for annexation. For additional information about urban development and residential growth policies, refer to pages 51 through 60 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the referrals from the Colorado Department of Health, Colorado Geological Survey, Hudson Fire Protection District, Panhandle "Eastern Pipeline Company, Bill McMurray, Hudson Sanitation District, Weld County School District RE-3 (J) , Division of Wildlife, and the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company have been enclosed for your review. The Department of Planning Services has received several inquiries and stated concerns on this proposal. Ent- D I to a concurrent application for a change of zone to a PUD District . Upon determining that the applicant has met the DUD Plan submittal requirements in Section 28. 5.3, the Department shall institute the applicable procedures under Section 21.4 of this Ordinance. 28.3 Duties of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider an application for a change of zone to a PUD District or an application for a PUD Plan. 28.3. 1 Change of Zone to a PUD District. 28.3. 1. 1 The Planning Commission shall hold a hearing to consider the application for the change of zone to ® a PUD District. The public hearing may involve AN3 either the rezoning application alone or may include the review of a concurrent application for a PUD Plan within the proposed PUD District. The Supplementary District Regulations, Section 40, and the Overlay Districts, Section 50 when -applicable, may also be reviewed concurrently. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the Roard of County Commissioners concerning the disposition of the requested change. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty (60) days of the initial hearing date. The Planning Commission shall recommend approval of the request for the change of zone to a PUD District unless it finds that the applicant -has not met one or more of the applicable requirements or conditions of Sections 28.3. 1. 1, 28.5 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of Sections 28.3. 1 . 1 , 28.5 and 28.6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 28.3. 1.1 .2 That the USES which would be allowed in the proposed PUD District shall be consistent with the Performance Standards of the PUD District contained in Section 35.3 of this Ordinance. 28.3. 1 . 1.3 That the USES which would be permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future DEVELOPMENT of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future DEVELOPMENT as projected by the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN or MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities. 28.3.1.1 .4 That adequate water and sewer service will be made available to the site to serve the USES permitted within the proposed PUD District; 20-58 11 28.3. 1. 1.5 That STREET or highway g y facilities providing access to the property are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. In the event that the STREET or highway facilities are not properly sized and are planned to be properly sized in the future, in conformance with the Weld County Thoroughfare Plan or in conformance with the MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities, the applicant may either wait to secure the rezoning until the improvements are made by the appropriate unit of government or the applicant may express a willingness to upgrade the STREET or highway facilities at his own expense in order to expedite approval of the requested change of zone. In the latter event, it will be necessary for the applicant to either construct the necessary improvements before the building permits are issued, or submit suitable performance guarantees to Weld County to ensure construction of the required STREET or highway facility improvements. 28.3. 1 . 1 .6 That there has been compliance with the applicable requirements contained in Section 21 .5. 1.5 of this Ordinance. 28.3. 1 .2 The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall forward the official recommendation of the Planning Commission and the information contained in the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, to the Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) days after said recommendation has been made. 28.3. 1 .3 If the Planning Commission recommendation is conditional upon the applicant completing certain specified items prior to the publication of the notice for the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, then the ten (10) day period shall commence upon submission of the items by the applicant to the Department of Planning Services. 28.3.2 PUD Plan 28.3.2. 1 The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider a PUD Plan application. The Planning Commission may review a PUD Plan concurrently with applications for a change of zone to a PUD District; for any Overlay District Permit; or for a Supplemental District Regulation. If a PUD Plan is applied for concurrently with PUD District application in which the PUD Plan it to be located, the Planning Commission shall review the PUD District application prior to the 20-59 1 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 29, 1984 NAME: Greater Hudson Development Co. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Dvellopment (R-1, R-4, C-3, agricultural and recreational uses) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 33 and 34, T2N and parts of Section 2 and 3, TIN, all in R65W, 6th P.m. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Adjacent and north of Hudson, north of State Highway 52 and I-76 east of Weld County Road 41 . LAND USE: N Pasture E Pasture S Sewage Lagoons, Interstate 76 and Town of Hudson W Pasture and flood plain ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural and the Town of Hudson W Agricultural COMMENTS: The south 1/2 (Section 2 and 3, TIN) of this proposed development is currently in crop production. The north 1/2 (Section 33 and 34, T2N) is pasture land. There is only one residence on the site at the present time. It is located at the end of Weld County Road Three (3) oil wells are currently on the site. Numerous (hundreds) of large decidious trees are on the eastern part of the site. Also in this part of the parcel are two reservoirs including the Ireland Reservoir #6 and the Peres Canal. Approximately 50 cows were grazing in this area at the time of the inspection. The slope varies across the site with the west one half being approximately 50 feet lower than the east one half. On the west one half of the site there appears to be areas of poor drainage as there exists several small areas where there is standing water. There is also one reservoir on the west side and the Beebe Seep Canal. The applicants proposed sewage system is in the 100 year flood plain west of the Beebe Canal. By: � t E es R. Nayerl C rrent Planner CCCC//// ' S° I `x to krcunconci a' i an I _. N�„, `,r°•4`e xs I. s JT: I f �.•lr • • I �0 h IL°0REST • • ' •1 ie ]�I 31 •'1I• x• , f• ]O pp •C \,•�� -•- - In — •• •_. _ _� •�°••�_ .�• � 4°33 `anal r,J I ii p' �'" -A n • `� se ••9yp.. s� ',•• 'Ni -• ' •:: `~L_ `h, • 111• `wit• • d J� `T °Mq. d! ED.: p cm., z 0•- ..por n s � x ��I 34 • 1/40a° '11 M I r•am z I s� I 1 s . ' • • ' •, vor•'._ ®.� 111 . I '�• ` d' I k: rd ' )• pp . • ii , . .. I . 75;II .4. ,. ,,, ; II i • A l s • rl _ N� �LoaTEvuE"� •• zzI I $7 ' n s ,�7 I I. .°•. az . i. Q•• I o / • n z r. - �F ' °� z• z I " V f I o 10 ' I u 23 ?. , ; r1X29 29 I c cs .J . a° pf e 33 II 35 v a 3 I 9 i i 4 '-i ers1 r- •hH �. • , . • Q�9 •; a v� • �� • • M • _ • ]• �• • •� • •Q23 .C.)\ Y J 7 • • is 4 X) <RIST0CRI • '� •a z] G i •II fir •Er •I 2$ /I of • a 05 .aQ ,y n _ • A ¢I IJ� • 53.53a ao • pe 2) zi ':._i °'• z.30 bi ' ' .O A 21 .w•s• S r° • _ .• _5---- / .F IZ s"' I• �° —j roe "o: . . r t: F' j.zt �c I ss co sz ss 5 76 / �0 ��. K • ` \ it °I.G� sz j'I • • — • • U •i's Y , I • 11+•. • i. . . z nl ... s 4 II •/o/ I • •63 • •y) J ' .I 1, . • /' 0. / , • ' • e '�. I . . I •1 .. , I 9 NY -, , ! Li • ruO ON a . P�„ • J 1• • c:i:±L1V'J . • av 1 _---� •s"a� x _. : • �r. FEE 23, a [I �,9, � � •!. s _o Rf\ 4CRSS g • ] 2,2 F/ • . 9 �o! zo� z. It . I WO) •/�• • • p F� wat iF B �G I ' 23 p r. i I.la J! I I C a •i` zo n 0 x cana�� ' c• °F t he 1A t'6 '%• '� C u� �'• �� a �� • I 'l1. 14 I i'liF ��• •L2 ' " ✓ L � •a r� • ,• (� so pMC 1x „ • m —u•- ( `` 1 p'� — •s• .r.a s• 7 a S • �• • , I • 1' E. >e 1 WeN�a49�mR � © 0 • 4 n � / b 45 © / �f CJ t %490 _• A o )�� - :- v 27 fi �la9,B x Cr Ave. �f] (::, � �� \',. ,','L'‘.:', -',,-,.?0. � PitB Well O� Cy l d gyp. �iJ� l 5 �rq�� / p-- Q v e 4926 ', I A \ 4945 _ Welt I'4905 CJ:.d.. 9 L- ---}_— —_ 492 4 `" .,,1 I,_\ s�� ©� mil` 1 �� , 1 ,\:. y�q J� 1 C) !J �W'd�711 i� °° 00 i O l 0 11 p ! �� _ �� /J C;-' o 1 •14926 - / Il - / -- - 49]ni No © . ,r 96 Re-greaxrr`�- j 4se `4493e 1 Q� v � f.. A r '1 / Windmill a 49/8 Po Y I a92a r _ _ — V . - ° 49S • S Cr / \ 2 I � h --- J � l 1 � /- - app 2 \ it iI � �;�ev p• �� 50 �i �.. 4928 4900 r 1 ' 49T9 _ Y�%•� •�� 11 �V \ s ,� ) • 8M 50H o . •.� .. • • / 0 5024 l c / W. I � �I � 9a ° ‘1a ? " <j 'Cod.. ,. a9n - 023AO I 11 'angle 9 . 11 V CBCI'VO Q o \ ^� 1 No --/ �� j 00 �I _ o 1 �I � z2_\_�il - - _ ��( /UI i e I 5020 � `, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 WilDe COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, April 2, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Ag and Recreational Uses) from the Greater Hudson Development Company on a parcel of land described as parts of Sections 33 and 34, T2N and parts of Sections 2 and 3, T1N, all in R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado containing 1089.33 acres, more or less. The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on April 2, 1985. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Robert E. Ehrlich, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the La Salle Leader To be published one (1) time by March 21, 1985 Received b ?/'/ ! f � Date: c — / 2 S REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Greater Hudson Development Company CASE NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 SENT REFERRALS OUT: March 8, 1985 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY March 22, 1985 v, z z z 0 �n O z F z - m i0-+ H co H z z H a Z C0=_' H W O0. W 0 W W H W it h; W W cn C U O c O U O a W U W U O 2 W 0 O P. W O 2 2P' Z 2 U Z z County Attorney (plat only) Tom Check Central oradocy Water N Weld County Health Department J ConservaColn Distr XX 2308 29th Street / Engineering Department Suite 2 / XX Greeley, Colorado 80631 V VVV County Extension Agent XX Dave Karpel Union Pacific Corporation Office of Emergency Management J Rocky Mountain Energy 10 Long' s Peak Drive Town of Hudson P.O. Box 2000 609 Cedar Street Broomfield, Colorado 80020 / P.O. Box 351 J XX Hudson, Colorado 80642 / Bill McMurray 536-4735 Weld County Planning Commission P.O. Box 161 (March 14 Meeting) Brighton, Colorado 80601 Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. State Engineer XX Division of Water Resources Attn: Ken Neff 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 635 North 7th Avenue P.O. Box 127 Denver, Colorado 80203 Brighton, Colorado 80601 659-5422 State Highway Department XX 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Hudson Fire Protection District Attn: Judith McGill / Colorado Department of Health `// P.O. Box 7 JXX Water Quality Control Division Hudson, Colorado 80642 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 J Weld County School District RE-3 Attn: Bob Gudka P.O. Box 269 / Rodney Sisson / Hudson Sanitation District Keenesburg, Colorado 80643 VVV p,0, Box 56 Hudson, Colorado 80642 Farmer' s Reservoir and Irrigation Company Julia Turney Attn: Manual Montoya Colorado Geological Survey 80 South 27th Avenue 1313 Sherman Street Brighton, Colorado 80601 Room 715 659-7373 Denver, Co 80203 - 866-2611 OFleft• 4t19 iy RICHARD D. LAMM * uco GOVERNOR * JOHN W.ROLD DIRECTOR 1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)886-2611 March 21, 1985 Mr. Michael Mullen Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: RE: HUDSON GARDEN VILLAGE PUD We have received the plat and subdivision application for the proposed P.U.D. We did not receive a report by Judith Hamilton, dated February 28, 1984, addressing the site geology. As we discussed on the phone, we will not be able to complete our review until we have received this report. Senate Bill 35 allows 24 days for our review of these applications. Based on our receiving the reginal application on March 8, 1985, our review should be complete by April 1, 1985. Sincerely, C J.E. Turney Engineering Geologist ca/JET-85-038 y741 .171 ;a85- Weltl Ca. vinmrule gnrnrn)ssrna GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Greater Hudson Development Company CASE NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 SENT REFERRALS OUT: March 7, 1985 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY March 22, 1985 m z z v 0 Z HO up O H N z r E. 0 F" W , q W0 EJ O W O F ti b N o U z o C r-' Z W W r-i W pi O O O N-i 00 W W U 0 W. zchi, a 0 z 0 m w z z � x z County Attorney (plat only) Aurther E. Doll Weld County Health De Colorado Racing Commission Department 11. $ 1525 Sherman Street Pr Engineering Department Room 110 �� Denver, Colorado 80203 County Extension Agent Brighton Soil Conservation Service Office of Emergency Management 60 South 27th Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 Colorado Division of Wildlife / Department of Natural Resources Attn: Larry E. Rogstad District Wildlife Manager 1528 28th Avenue Court Greeley, Colorado 80631 State Engineer Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Highway Department 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 ' 4:a jan O nry • , niii ttr , Michael S. Mullen lig :: ,,1 �. To Planning Department Date March 19, 1985 COLORADO From Donald R. Carroll , Administrative Manager - Ingineering Dept. Subject: Hudson Garden Village Plan Unit Development We have reviewed the above mentioned for change of zone . Information lacking includes the following referenced sections of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations : 4-1A(1) No existing utility information is included 4-1A(2) Topographic features are not related on the same drawing to the proposed improvements. There is no lot layout. The street layout is unclear and inadequate particularly in Phase 5 Residential area. No utility easements are shown. 4-1A( 3) No water system proposal is included 4-14(5) No storm drainage proposal is included In addition to the submittal being incomplete, we have serious concerns regarding the plan. 1 . The road system appears to provide for little general traffic flow. The entire development is served with one access and interior streets do not properly provide for through traffic movements . 2. Road 122 is of asphalt surface in very poor condition. Road 431 is a gravel base road in fair condition. 3. The developer shall be responsible to pave the access roads 121, 432 from SH 52 to the Planned Unit Development, as defined in paragraph (1) above. The project shall include necessary earthwork, base work, utility relocation right-of-way acquisition, drainage structures rehabilitation and surfacing to provide a paved roadway 24 feet in width with gravel shoulder 6 feet in width . Design standards shall reflect the AASHTO and Colorado Department of Highway standards in effect at the time of the project with horizontal and vertical align- ment. (1) Primary access to the Planned Unit Development shall be via WCR 121 from SH 52 or 1-76 Service Road via WCR 431 to SH 52. (2) Comments should be requested from the Colorado Department of Highways Department for access from state highway. (3) It appears that the applicant plans to place sanitary facilities in the Beebe Draw flood plain. DRC/bf `il , L I l/il nI,nn Irlrll` 2 51985 *Oil ran. Planning Commission Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 Perch 13 , 12B5 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 epertr.ent of Flenrin, :2/devices Wel1 County ,;tonriel 2dntev 715 Tenth tr >et Greeley , Colorado 80631 _r_tIn: . 1ke ullen .ent Ilenrc Unit _ ; _Chart :hear hr. u1 '�en: Thank you for your consideration of The tour of Cuusur. ' Hitere is concerrinm t. e above arobo ee r =2 r. Tre ... -,d to the rezcninm oI the above due to the fo_lowino reasons : rescrAnsT is nmt comretabldwith t ' :ommrehehsiya 2 . _min of bson would -e Ter= to �complete treir hetititn for a:nnoxhticn. ^ town would ou ' the pr r, ; e ofzoning after mine :et on, It woul3 be difficult to annex land that was not oPmpatable with the town of Hudson' s Comprehensive Ilan. 3 . The town of Hudson will not provide municipal services to areas outside of the tot:n boundaries . u. Weld County can not afford to provide municipal se �vices for the proposed- development . (Snow removal wouldhe veru cumbersome , not to mention animal control , etc 5. -The developers should strive to develope a positiveworking relationship ' th the Lawn of hudson and file a completed petition for annexation and aIOw the town to "'G:ie the property r,ftor (or during) annexation. ?nclosed please find : I . Documentation suplortirg the town of hu.dson' s striving for a positive working relationship with _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)53-6-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 HUDSON, COLORADO 30642 i pspe 2 te, „�' all 0ocurn ntca activity) the c� ev�lcpers . (Summary L. The sections never complete'" on the .,e'e_opers petition for annexation. ' Comments re tat , r,v to h ro os d _rezoning not Laing • -comTatobie Sri th ..uls O ' s Comprehensive Plan. 4 . 1 r.. vi CUs cornesaohdence from - o i_.:,ct.. Msrinn cho first rhase . :11 ot=rees with `t i KII . yeri An all , �[ . ;•!?'_ * ''-F1.,:toted_ in *MC -,c n n ] r t that the c ��T ei 2 qtr; n` c. - e`1-.�ln '"_. Services -0C`�(Lrrl , vo vorSing neistion- nh.io with. the tC r,n of t udson conformance to the town' n v s desires as e rr�o --%C_ in their comprehensive plan is n., of the residential , ,'otvth, i oL_cies the ..elc. County comprehCen- S i:r Ilan." Sincere7.y, The Trustees of the Town of Hu son 7 Susan Worth , clayor 'trustee Trustee U 1--.`- 4,11 711 e Trust Trustee Trustee enclosures h.flr2h 1C , 7 °. K The fcllowin a sspmary . _ tte intmractsn petween the cups and/or comlanies h_r. , ..rata has repretento and the snustees of the Town of l'ud -.n: July 1983 - Colorado Turf Club aptroncred __UGSOt hoard_ of Trustees concerning e Iroposed harness racetrack. Cary Kennedy aap rerrescntirg ;rule,. ad ., Sdrf aprihr this Those . *July 1793 - .. letter nips .ent to the dolarado socing -'omm _ _; n c criccr i nc the pcsHibilitv pi ,stablichn:- harness raceway in the hussar. r anh exprnt: ing oupt O t ihtraof. ( see attached ) *Aug. 1987 - Letters sent to Fr . fund V2.. halph! E. Draue , Fritcnle and Company, .n k.. . snd i' r . _ most Conway by Le . Landra Eo '_l ors , ..-mayor reoue:tb: r that they s er annexation t0 allew the _ . for the proposed harness men22k to t hc *suer. 1083 - A letter to anyone conoerndd pith the proposed annexation was composed by eandra Boller o . (See unto... nc ) -Cat . 7 , '_ 93 - attached notes from a conversation ..ayor a^cra poll -r . Pad with Pr. Lartab li .mbe roved 712 concerning servicos . It ea s Colorado Turf was willing to turn over all servicas to the town of Hudson. 'Toyr 1 ')s7 - An _ lcnmrlet d petition for annexation Colorado Raceway Estates s was Tres ^nt?c. to the `chi ef Hinson. 'c. :h , 1993 - . u'oi _ ..ear inns csncerninr r ;lor 0O Turf, inc . , .fro: the Proposed Colorado harness -:ooe ;n.v. Curl Kennedy Ind Sari Kennedy ,sonC reS. r ti__, Colo. co Turf, Inc . _O9h - 0Oc',.. 'ntation concerning ,:concernicT a sarceI of n: which of section 9 , Township 1 , re o land, presented the to town_ cf }hudson. his -ircel.,appears jike it 0 ._ to :till within the townlimits of Laps .: If so , it w wic make it easier to annex proposed are:eres for Colorado Larnpss _ace ay. Jan. ,10,91: - Special meeting of Town Trustees , I lL nln£ Board , Sewer Board with Gary Kennedy, Jeelee Lathew - Planner for Mobile Home Park, Richard Brownlee - Head of Development Company, Philip Niernberg, Hark hiernber€*, and Lee Murata. a) Gary Kennedy had called this special meeting to help start a working relationship between the developers and the different town boards theywould be wor'kiro with. b) An overview of the mobile home project was given. c ) Fr . Vathews wanted a decision that night on whether the town would annex or not. (This was the first meeting, please note ) *Feb. 29 ,178h - Hudson Town Council 'dorkshop cf 2-29-8u. Lee Nurata was present. See attached copy of minutes . *Have attached documentation ,.er 1 , ;00 age 2 of _ urm.ery April d, 194- - Completion nf crotf that thin porde]. er lend mention-3n h Jan . _ Instill. within oil town limits of buCcon. The town. nt ,h1 - _Me refers to the c vel o ,ers as the Greater su.:Ncn 'Development ;ompeny. ` ry L: ,1 n24 - Incomplete : atiticn for crr . et. on cdarpitued to the town of hudson ,y the Greeter '-ur ; on havelargent Comiany. cy 15 , 1284 - Letter rant to __"e P urn t.^ rf t.I'. r .': - r huccon evel: , en c :, any ichneernnyr theH r acha of thaaatr, .; f logo]. loes CT.11_ expehoec 'Poo oph. . cur on their henalf. It was X. ai ed thr?t this i ;tan( ere- rt of .1,.;.C_ ' nne .,.jop r. cIn. nc '. _:ay 19, 984 - La tter from town cf h ucscr. to Lee Curato of the Grouter leanhon hevelopmeht Co . inriOrinn specifically as to hat type r..T . . el-opment is pror;osed . Nay 21 , 1984 1 9811 - Town of i udson Trustee meeting with Cavil. gown, water attorney, Cindy Cley, general. town ??ttorney, .;nd The yirch , lend attorney , concerning proposed annexation. *May 2}r )ft.'. - lne hUrata en :. 7i +hurr+ 2' oY:nlee attended this 'r''rkshop of the town of Hudson' s aTrd of Trustees . ( see attached) *June 11 , -.52L - Date of letter received .from _Lee hurata Fes handing to _ uason_' s letter of =-, 9 The master Ilan referred to n the letter was p ' up by the ': ud: cn Develongent Comb any and never turned . There has yet to 'cc a macter pien en file foom `^C Greoter Lancon ._Salop _ Craherny at the town hall ef but s.eh. Jul 17 , 1'284 - H3tater reem t ec;n' . water attorney , havia. 72rown, ecrr-r( inc a one ti_^ with ,avid Lc' Din. , the developer' s water attorney. Aug- 8 ,1984 — Copy of letter of a background study of :autioa Investment Company conducted by i fountain West Cortoage Company was recd c'd from the Hue son Sanitation District. The firm advised. the anitatton District not to work with Nautica. *Aug. 28 , 1984 - Letter to da.utica Investment , Inc . , stating the town of Hudson would not discuss annexation any further until all expenses the town had incurred on Nautic ' s behalf were paid. in full. Aug. 29,1985 - Letter from David Drown, Hudson' s water attorney, regarding an aTplication of Greater Hudson _Development Company in seeking to chanme the use of its Laramie-Fox Hills conditional water right _from irrigation to municipal , -commercial , industrial , etc. . . to serve some part of the purposed development. The town of Hudson filed no objection. *Aug 23 ,1984 - David 9obbins , water attorney for the developers„ and Lee Furata attended Trustee workshop. Aug. 31 ,1984. - Letter recntved from David Robbins , developer' s water attorney, along with a check to cover past expense indebtness due the town from 12-31-83 • through 8-1-84, . :.rc_" _i; , '. '2C -`Hut' - �- __.. „_2nt:> r ._'� .. ..Ll fl_C��p .�.J Lor; "'nt. i Company choose to stor aonexaticn n =y began .tit oninm cni thre y , _^ct: Flan.nin,m [;°'lice of 1eTd Count. 1Hn4. l f'81L - Ietter and check from ev_3 iobhios roc-r _ s, - yment for rn -'rvi .. ncu n 'e town ,-f Hudson on the .elor ' , „, .. 'Letter `C'_^T. Lee 1.11rta Con cenY11 7 Jet:e to ork cree oF.2.in wit.H. the town of oic n en ro ,"r Hettr n snT9whnh of , _„_ Lt .1 t'..to .oat --.. '101 __.-_ tt county on tit 2 inr � e 1;T. ._ � 1'... , , 19 ; - 1:.atycyr lorth ink _ ted Fr. Hurate to Hudson. 7rustee meetinr of March 1: . r sk .d . ar , t�. to inform town t' V 3t r.r. .. '.d tto ,-iscucs at thts f eet.inf Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 iinrch 10 , 1985 Il aye find below the town of tudson' s concerns pertaining to the ofd County Comprehensive Flan, the town of Hudson, _l_ic` the Toro „.. o_°v lor '.ent of :udson Garden Village : o1icy .r2 of :e :del_,_ County Comprflhensive lien concerning Sidential =eve o;-;ment states : Trcioonls for -°ew - 1: ntial r evel opment s. , _ninr axi:t _ municiralities shall to encouraged so lonrr as rhey conform to the desire's: f the towns as expressed in `y.:ei ^ crmprehensive ans . The town of Fu'_son . ;ponds to this 73 follows . ( a ) According tC the hudson Comprehensive Ilan on pare 67 , ;Y7 , . . . "Future T ans are to. . esi_nate residential development ''O areas south , east , and west of an orderly ' Toce.ss S phasing annexation. " The propose!_ for County rezoning is in En area PETITE of Hudson. The area immediately southeast of the proposed area designated for rezoning is for a future land use of industrial in the Hudson Comprehensive Finn. (see mar #7 ) (b) In keeping with the Weld County Comprehensive plan the Hud on Comprehensive Flan designates that . . . "all future development for annexation purposes shall be discouraged on Prime agricultural land . " (rare 67 , .f6 , also, sea map t6) A section of the proposed aree for rezoning is prime agricultu 'a.l land . (also see letter dated 10-18-84 from Platte Valley Soil Conservation District) (c ) Page 68 of Hudsons Comprehensive Plan specifies a break- down of future land use. The future plan is to allow only 3i of all residential dwelling units to be mobile homes . If the developers plan on using mobile homes as stecified during an earlier meting with t:ie town of Hudson, this would far exceed the comprehensive plans land usle plans . Also , page 67 specifies the town of Hudson' s policy for designating sufficient land for residential , commercial and industrial uses to encourage even amount of growth. ranch 10 , 1985 rave 2 Policy "3 cf the Weld. County Comprehensive llen concerning � residential develonreent p=..'>tates : 'xistinr municiralities are the bast end most efficient sources of bublic Foods ana oervices which 2T9 necessary to serve new .sico 'ti_',i developments . Theses munictra ties will be encoil red ..igmrove their ability to serve new developments and will- be looked. to for service cf all new deve1 orme_nt within their corporate areas , in annexable areas lacedimmdiately adjacent to the town ana even those areas not immediately avaiable '.n;..__,.. oP. but I t ",1n nsoLa service oistance from the .ounicir'al ity. „e town oT Hudson responds as follows : ( a) This is in direct conflict with the own' : Annexation Ordinance which states in Section 11 , -1 , to oihnicinal services to areas outside of the bournortes of the town. (b) Tt not --., _ .a.SG �a^� _, 3..}i Lee� __� _y ;.r:: of the town of hut7liisnini to extonn mmliciieal services to area: not ithin tire er .,:i hout townn;, t'- the =n _ �t_ - _ tax ecilens_ - - o.. said areas to _ay - or these service: . :olicy 11 of the ,7_c County Comp hens co ncerning r .ing utilities , nubl_c �.[ecc s , and services states : Any dev lopment . .t wiy create an undue burden on egistinr 'Libl1c facilities and. wi L 1 diminish the ° pac ty of public ai.encieo ad r.aintain the tine level of service shall be aisccuraved. The town of Hudson resronds as follows : (a) The town of Hudson would not be able to provide any municipal services to the proposed area for rezoning without causing the town undue hardship. however, 1f . the developers would choose to work with the town and petition for annexation, these services could be provided. •4.or CQLo rN O COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Richard D. Lamm 114, Thomas4. M.Vernon, M.D. Governor I8 qg =xecutive Director Q March 25, 1985 d it.Z' > 9r. Michael S. Mullen „ 708 Current Planner W er�� Weld County Department of Planning Services G- p''q'rp�re 4gq�y�� Gq RE: Greater Hudson Development Company (Garden Village P.U.D.) Dear Mr. Mullen: The Water Quality Control Division has reviewed the above referenced -develop- ment proposal. The construction of a wastewater treatment facility will be subject to the Division's site application and discharge permit processes. Major factors to be considered in any site application are consistency with the adopted Regional Water Quality Management Plan and the consolidation of treatment facilities. The proposal appears to conflict with both of these issues at this time. Pending resolution of these issues and issuance of a site approval, no favorable recommendation will be forthcoming. Sincerely, / 2 tifai Tom Bennett Senior Planner Planning and Standards Section Water Quality Control Division TB:njf 4210 FAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER.COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320-8333 Hudson Fire Protection District P.O. Box 7 Hudson, Colorado 80642 March 20, 1985 Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sir; The Board of Directors of the Hudson Fire Protection District have reviewed the plans for the Greater Hudson Development (Hudson garden Village) and we feel that to justify a decision of re- commendation we need more information, We are referring to size and type of water lines, location of fire hydrants and how many, how much water is actually available for firefighting, and whether this water would be of well or lake origin, Also of concern to us is the considerable population growth possible with a project of this type and the problem it presents with our budget, We simply don't have the money or equipment available to serve a development of this size, The Lockwood project in itself is going to put a serious strain on our depart- ment when it's completed, We hope the representatives of the Greater Hudson Development can understand our position on this matter, Sincerely, 1/176..d_cji , Robert Bullard President of the Board of Directors Hudson Fire Protection District RB/jm PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY P, O. BOX 127 BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 March 21, 1985 2 1985 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Current Planner Weld County Planning Commission Weld Co. PlanningCnmmission 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80601 RE: Case Number Z-418:85-4: Dear Mr. Mullen: As your Hudson Garden Village P.U.D. Rezoning Plat shows, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company has several lines in this area. We maintain a 50-foot wide right-of-way and will not allow any building within that easement area. The owner or developer shall have the right to construct and maintain utility lines, streets, sidewalks, and driveways which may be installed at approximate right angles to the pipeline herein authorized, provided, however, that all utilities maintain 12 inches clearance from our pipeline. No paved or traveled portion of any street, sidewalk, driveway, road, parking area, alley or curbing will be placed substantially parallel to and within ten feet of the pipeline. In the event of a proposed crossing with a road or utility, notificaion of 48 hours is to be given to Panhandle so the line may be properly located to eliminate accidents that can occur from foreign forces. We will be more than happy to work with the developer on this project. If for any reason our line must be moved, it will be at the expense of the developer or the person or persons asking for this movement. Sincerely, PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY Ken J. Neff Right-of-Way Representative KJN/gw enclosures FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 DATE OF INSPECTION: ) l ` Y NAME: Greater Hudson Development Company REQUEST: A Change of Zone from Agricultural to Planned Unite Development (R-1, C-3, R-4, Agricultural and Recreational Uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 33 and 34, T2N, and part of Sections 2 and 3 T1N, all _ in R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LAND USE: N T E ZONING: N LOCATION: Adjacent and north of Hudson town E limits; north of State Highway 52, and I-76, S Past of Weld County Road 41 W COMMENTS: I`///l 11 VC /v/ p} ;c) 12 . r / L' � tA_ r c c. / ✓L I I C L-y /: i i.1 L rr n / / C 7— iy %T/t fL-,Cn'cc j) jLe 7`j /9 . IC (-TtC h[= /9 17/77 , j r This' f_7 rSf 7_ FL 2 TA!n pj ci bJc 2- LA, 11 - lf ,//c CA /4 a -7--f/�/ T« ti , �F �) b if6 ti o21 c(/(6c z r e g /') :5/4 i-1 S / 7//ti/ /N/1 <« i A ,CL /7 g'e/✓/77( rift /=.C'c -yr(TT BY: / /�'-F /L1c � 1 HUD G' i . AN1TATI'ON DiSltfl.CP o, 0. '.BOX `76 Hudson , Colorado 8064 October 12, 1984 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street c.. Greeley, Colorado 80651 iI1 lii;!1 C'J. PInnitte DittASSW Dear Mr. i':ayerl: ':Je have reviewed your information concerning the Hudson Garden Village. We have included several letters written and received over the past year by this Board. The -Board doesn't feel comfortable with the developer for the reasons explained in the letter from Mountain West aortgage Corporation dated. August 0, 1984. The Flan also calls for possible mobile homes. We are not in favor of any more mobile homes in our area as we have two mobile home :barks in Hudson at this tint:. The Board also feels it doesn't have the expertise or the time to become involved in a project of this magnitude. We have a growth plan in effect until the year 2000 and it is progressing on schedule. be hope our efforts have been of value to you and your staff. Sincerely, Hudson Sanitation District BOARD OF EDUCATION WAYNE 0UNKER V.Pres. ALAN BURRY Pros JANET CARLSOW Sec y IVAN OSTER.hens_ IVAN JINN ERUR Issi. Srcy Weld County School District Re-3 (J) BOB C. GUDKA, Supt. DALE L. RECKARD. Asst. Supt. KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 October 16, 1984 James R. Mayerl, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 In May of 1984 the district sent to the county and other cevernment entities a policy or position paper which the Weld County Re-3 (J) Board of Education passed concerning new housing developements within our school district boundries. The board is still very concerned about the impact that new students might have on current and future programs. A copy of this position paper in enclosed. Our first concern must be on the General Fund, because there car, be as much as a fourteen month delay before the district receives any money for providing a student's education. A large increase in students population would mean a need for new building facilities. The district would have to look at the possibility of bond issues in which all the residents of Re-3 (J) would be voting on tax increases for purchasing additional properties and construction of new buildings. The district has upmost in its mind of providing the best educational program it can, with the resources available. Because of this and the problems expressed earlier, we would appreciate you asking Lee '1urato of the Greater Hudson Development Co. to contact me concerning the problems we have expressed. Sincerely, --f� ti r rY 1 U� �.'l l is N un 5 1'�/ 11 I' Bob C. Cudka Superintendent ;NEW Co. Cnmmiss+nn HG/de • STATE OF COLORADO Richard D. Lamm, Governor r. O1.ORgi): DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE 3 ., - �yy JamesB3.9Ruch, Director O'YOF`r7 ' 6060 Broadway Denver,Colorado 80216(2977192) Larry Rogstad, District Wildlife Manager 1528 28th ave. court Greeley, Colo. 30631 Mr. Michael S. Mullen, County Planner 0/0 Weld County Planning? Department 915 10th -street Greeley, Colorado 90631 Dear Mr. Mullen We have reviewed the plans of the Greater Hudson Development Company, _case num- ber Z-L18:95:LI. While the Division of Wildlife has _found no conflicts with the pr)rosed -development and its effect on -the wildlife _resource, we feel it nec- essary to -address our concerns about -future conflicts that may arise from the development. The possible conflict would involve -the Canasa Goose population in southern Weld county. The area chosen _for the Hudson Carden Village is on a local "flyway" for -geese between itinton Reservoir, Horse Creek Reservoir -and yarr Lake. The development cans for construction of a golf course, and large green belt areas. Experience has shown that -the construction of golf courses draw the geese in like a magnet. The Greater Hudson Development corporation should take this into consideration. If a -problem with geese should arise, the Division of Wildlife will not take responsibility for correcting the problem. The Division would be happy to offer advice as to possible solutitns, but the Greater Hudson Development Corp. would have to provide the man power and costs in correcting any problem with ge-ese. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to express our concerns. Sincerely yours, - Larry Rogstad c.c. file DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES, David H. Getches, Executive Director•WILDLIFE COMMISSION,James C. Kennedy, Chairman Timothy W. Schultz, Vice Chairman•Michael K. Higbee, Secretary.Richard L. Divelbiss, Member•Donald A. Fernandez, Member Wilbur L. Redden, Member.James T. Smith, Member+Jean K. Tool, Member THE FARMERS RESERVOIR AND IRRIGATION COMPANY 80 SOUTH 27TH AVENUE BRIGHTON COLORADO 80601 P ONE 659 737J LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. TO: STEVE SCHMIDT SUBJECT: THE GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT (Z-410:CS:4) P1ea5e find attached a copy of the cover letter from Weld County Dept_ of Planning_ In the packet Mr . murata included a letter from Hydro-Triad dated Jan _ 3 1'9:J5. As _I understand Mr _ Murata #-gas not receive the letter form you and has not received the approval of the Farmers Company to use this information for his plan_ It appears that he has used the letter to mislead the Planning Dept_ Do what you hive to do to protect. Hydro-Triad from this type of action taken by Mr _ Murata the Farmers Company will do the same_ COMMENTS:_._..__.__.__._--.--.-----•---•--•----_.___...--------------_....____._.._._.___.-.------ -____.___ Thank You, Manuel -Montoya Tech cc . Albert Sac-k FRICO Board James Mayerl (Pi-arming Dept. ) . THE FARMER RESERVOIR AND IRRIGATION COMPANY 80 SOUTH 27TH AVENUE BRIGHTON COLORADO 80601 PHONE 679 737J LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: MIKE MULLEN SUBJECT: GREATER HUDSON DEVELOPMENT (Z-418) We have received the packet of information on the Greater Hudson Development_ Attached is a copy of a letter to Jim Mayerl . The Farmers Company would like to again state the same comments regarding the need for the development t.o go though the review proses_ I personally feel that. Mr. Murata has not followed the direction that. the Board had given him in order to approve his plans and that his actions of ignoring the review is deliberate_ Mr . Murata has used a letter from Hydro-Triad dated January 3, 1985 with out the permission of the Farmers Company . The letter was compiled using data developed at the Farmers Company expense for the Company exclusive use on another projec:t. At. the Companies direction Hydro-Triad prepared that .letter for Mr _ Murata, but subsequently declined t.o allow the release of the information until the Company was certain that fir . Murata would follow though on the review process and other obligations. Hydro-Triad is not Mr . Murata's engineer and the information in the January 3, 1985 is not Mr_ Murata's property_ At this time I ask that you not use this document or any other document for approving his development until the review is completed at that time the Farmers Company will submit the review comments and agreements to you_ If you have any questions please do riot hesitate to call_ Thank Your M /' !gmAA, ' ! 'Iry N - " Manuel Montoya 13E., - ^ ' ;::;;I Tech_ cc Albert Sack Board of Directors -�— — Hydro—Triad V7E,d CO. Mom! Cammrss:ju 4er: MEMORAnDU wiseTo Department of Planning Date 3/27/85 COLORADO From Wes Potter- Health Protection Service 1L1& 4 swamHudson Garden Village Case Z-418 :85:4. In reviewing the proposal for the Hudson Garden Village, I have certain reservations and questions regarding the water and sewage utilities. The proposed source of water is vague as to the specific amount of water from the Foxhills aquifer and the shallow water wells in the alluvium. The object, obviously, is to blend the water to reduce the total level of nitrates in the water supply. There is no indication of the specific blend proposed. There is also a question of the total amount of Foxhills water available. The report shows up to 251 acre-feet available and the water resources permit shows 14.0 acre-feet appropriated. I think that this needs to be clarified. A more important question is the specific structure of the management of the water system and sewage system. Will this be a Home Owners Association or will it be the Town of Hudson? I think that we need to evaluate these problems in more depth. PKP MAR 27 1985 Weld Co. Planning Commission arX�nt I • / f Town of Hudson anpy PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 Narch 21 , 1985 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 Greater hudson 1-,evalopment Company 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lurton, CO 80621 Attn : Lee I• ur.ata :Thar Er . burata: Thank you for attending our regular trustee meeting of 3-13-85. The following is a summary of our discussion: 1 . There are several areas that were never completed on your annexation petition which was submitted Nay 4, 1984. (copy of annexation ordinance enclosed) 2. You are requesting confirmation of the towns acceptance of the documentation you presented earlier concerning whether the property is contigious or not. ( shall be completed shortly) The town is requesting the following information concerning your organization: 1 . Names and addresses of all companies and./or individuals involved. 2. Key people we can contact in ecos of the above . 3 . Which part each company and/or individual plays within the total organization. ( i .e. builder , investor , etc. . . . ) Please let me know in writing at least 5 working days ahead of time when you wish to be placed on the next agenda. Thank you , raff Susan Worth Ii1AR 28 1985 Nayor Wald to. Planning Commissloo ec : I/cYeld County Planning Commission, Attn : bike Eu_len Sue Burch , Attorney Nau`.ica Investments a k*. f- F STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 40. OF 48 P.O. Box 850 .+ p "*.Ji Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 , y� (303)353-1232 ac? g 1 Lc224WE March 20, 1985 ,,,,-);2 28 1985 Weld County, S.H. 52 U __ Hudson Garden Village PUD W. of I-76 on N Side Mr. Michael S. Mullen WeWW Ca. PiX8514 �runrra55i8r S.H. 52 Department of Planning Services DOH File 45100 Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the Hudson Garden Village P.U.D./Change of Zone and the Traffic Impact Study. As indicated in our October 22, 1984, letter to your office, our main concern is the traffic impact of this development on State Highway 52 and the Interstate 76 service road. Access to this P.U.D. would be obtained from existing county roads which connect to S.H. 52 and existing roads to the I-76 service road. State Highway 52 has a Category Three designation for the purpose of our access review, and no private direct access is permitted if reasonable alternative access is available. The existing public roads provide the necessary alternative access. The service road has a Category Five designation and private direct access is permitted. The number of accesses to the service road would be determined by the posted speed limit and access will be permitted if the spacing criteria can be met. Application for an Access Permit to construct a new access is made to this office. The size of this P.U.D. and the various proposed uses indicate a significant traffic potential. The impact of this traffic on the S.H. 52 county road intersections will exceed the criteria in the State Highway Access Code for turn lanes. We recommend that median left turn lanes and right turn deceleration lanes be provided by the developer at these intersections. The design and construction of these lanes should be coordinated with this office. Thank you for the opportunity to review this P.U.D. Please contact Wally Jacobson at this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ALBERT CHOTVACS DISTRICT ENGINEER • JKC:mbc for John K Crier cc: A. Chotvacs District Planning/Envi onmental Manager D. Yost Area Foreman File: Crier/Jacobson THE FARMERS RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION CO. 80 S.27TH AVENUE BRIGHTON,COLORADO 80601 March 28, 1985 Department of Planning Services 915 10th St. Greeley, Colo. 80631 ATTN: Mike Mullen RE: Greater Hudson Development Dear Mr. Mullen: This letter is to clarify the earlier letter sent by FRICO in response to the request received from the Planning Commission to comment on the above noted development. The Hydro-Triad cover letter referred to in my earlier letter had been given to Mr. Murato by FRICO. The supporting infor- mation and data referred to in the letter, however, has not been furnished to Mr. Murato pending completion of a certain agreement for the reimbursement of FRICO's costs. We want to insure that there is no misunderstanding concerning Mr. Murato's use of the Hydro-Triad cover letter. In providing this clarification, the Company still is of the opinion that there has not yet been sufficient information on drainage provided to FRICO in accordance with FRICO's established procedures. Further, there has not yet been sufficient information provided to FRICO to comment on the proper source of water for the development and potential impact on FRICO's rights. Thus, no comment in this regard is presently provided although it is FRICO's position that it will protect as necessary the integrity of its ditch system and water rights. • Very truly urs,.� Manuel Montoya 0 I`��l �� Technician „ MM:csf :R wu 19E5 Well C . Mallow cemfesaiea £A;L,44 LtSJ T�Il� of co \�\ (�) WE-85-0003 Ati � y� 90 RICHARD D. LAMM * (o5)6 GOVERNOR it < /krm *: JOHN W ROLD 876 * DI ECTOR COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611 March 27, 1985 rj^^ Mr. Michael Mullen D p_i)hic\Av Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street �,. 0 ": 1985 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: Vieth �u ttanl/lt, i uniuiss'sm: RE: HUDSON GARDEN VALLEY ZONE CHANGE We have reviewed the plat, engineering geology and groundwater availability reports by Judith Hamilton and attendant information for the proposed development. The reports by Ms. Hamilton do an excellent job of evaluating the site geologic conditions and their potential affect on development. Information included in the application indicates that the first phase of the development may contain 1 ,000 dwelling units. A critical aspect of development of this area will be water supply and sewage disposal . We recommend that central systems be designed for this subdivision. Water Supply It appears from a miltons report that available. She makes several recommendations for reserves forprovingathere pexistenceyof suitable water supplies and getting legal rights to use the water. Ms. Hamilton states: "I would suggest the following steps for development of water supply. Some of these may have already been instituted. 1. Apply for adjudication of the Laramie-Fox Hills and Arapahoe permit applications. 2. Apply in Water Court for approval of an augmentation plan utilizing return flows from the sewage treatment plant to supply 90% of the make-up-required for tributary water use, with the 10% consumptive use being supplied by return flows from the Laramie-Fox Hills wells. 3. Drill test holes on your property to determine suitable locations for producing adequate quantity and quality of alluvial water. GEOLOGY --77-- STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE CLtb. te- J.. Mr. Michael Mullen March 27, 1985 Page 2 4. Apply for well permits for alluvial wells in the most suitable locations. These permits will be denied because they are tributary, but approval of the permits can be requested through the water court in the augmentation process. 5. Apply to the State Health Department for a discharge permit for the proposed sewage treatment facility." These items are the first initial steps in providing adequate water supplies to the proposed development. Additionally, we recommend that a central collection, treatment and distribution system be designed for the site. Sewage Disposal The application indicates that sewage lagoons will be used for sewage disposal and the plat shows the lagoons located in the 100 year flood plain. We recommend that the sewage disposal system, and any other development, not be located in the flood plain. We recommend that a central collection and treathe ptental sizetofnt theystem b desind for thesubdivision,gaerelativelydlargepandtsophisticatedgsystemowillibe required and professional maintenance will be needed. Other items that we recommend be addressed in the future are: 1 . A site drainage and erosion control plan should be developed; 2. A subsurface investigation should be completed; 3. Development should be excluded from the flood plains. Based on the geologic reports, there does not appear to be major geologic hazards areas within the proposed development. We have no objection to the rezoning. However, water availability, legal and actual , will control the extent of development on the site. We do not recommend approval of any development until suitable water resources are available. Sincerely, -et. cis J.E. Turney 1 Engineering Geologist ca/JET-85-038 DOC. 129K STATE Or COLORADO OF COO COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 � Department of Regulatory Agencies 1525 Sherman Street yTs� Denver,Colorado 80203 August J. Masciotra (303)866-2294 f + Executive Secretary *1876. L . .._.'_ ' . «...'� October 18, 1984 ' ' dr.. ti l ur " \Ci i Richard D.Lamm C I::J:. CA Governor � Wellinpon E.Webb IN RE: Case No. S-242:84:14 B J� .,' q Executive Director e`!"^. 'k Mr. James R. Mayerl, Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915-10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Jim: I have received your referral in the above-referenced case number. I have reviewed the paperwork and see that phase I of a planned unit devel- opment is the proposed harness raceway. As of October 18, 1984, the Racing Commission has not received any application from the Greater Hudson Development Company for a racetrack license. We therefore cannot begin to investigate or set a hearing date for phase I of this project. We have no objections to the balance of the project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Arthur E. Doll Security Coordinator cc: Commission Mark Miller, Assistant Attorney General Eddie Haefeli a Platte Valley Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 October 18, 1984 Mr. James R. Mayerl , Current Planner Weld County Colorado OAT 2$ 1984 Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 @hppip4. inrtmrssm, Weld to.RE: Case Number S-242:84: 14 Lee Muratct, Greater Hudson Development Company Dear Mr. Mayerl : We have the following comments on this referral . Soils: According to the map of "Important Farmlands of Weld County Colorado", a small part of this land in sections 2 and 3, township 1 north, range 65 west, would be prime if they become irrigated. Soil limitations have been covered in the report by Judith L. Hamilton dated February 28, 1984. Drainage: This appears to be covered in the report by Judith L. Hamilton dated Feb- ruary 28, 1984. Drainage should be done on any area where the soils show a flooding problem if structures are to be built there, even though fill material is brought in to raise the elevation. We agree with the above mentioned report that all drainage systems should have a positive outfall . An overall drainage plan should be prepared. It appears that most of the runoff will drain into the Beebe Seep Canal . This part of the drainage plan should be approved by the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Com- pany, Brighton, Colorado. The runoff from section 2, township 1 north, range 65 west will drain mostly in a northeasterly direction. Provisions should be made for this drainage. Erosion and Sediment Control : We agree with the statement, in the report by Judith L. Hamilton, that these soils are susceptible to blowing. Soils should be protected to prevent erosion, especially during the windy season. Water erosion can also be a problem on unprotected land where water collects and runs off, such as down spouts and drainage ways. An erosion and sediment control plan should be prepared for this proposed development. Included in this plan should be a drainage plan. Sincerely, / 7' Bob Warner, President Board of Supervisors / II CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT K�tl�l MOUNTAIN WEST MORTGAGE CORPORATION I 611011E 11101 GIRCIE 51)11). (X) ENE,E'WOOD COI 011400 00111 C,1)'1: '92-9599 August 8, 1984 Hudson Sanitation District P.O. Box 56 Hudson, CO 80642 C. Sirs: As per your request, VIA Steve Fiegel, I have completed the Background Study"on: Nautica - Investment, Inc. Richard Brownlee Box 29-629 San Antonio, Texas The past 21 weeks I have tried to obtain information about the above mentioned firm from my personal contacts in San Antonio /�. ie. , Banks, Savings & Loans, other development companies. I have also contacted the local governmental agencies such as the Chamber of Commerce, Better Business Bureau & the Secretary of State. The only information which is available was that the corporation established itself January 13, 1984. I then contacted the corporation myself. I made five telephone calls at varying times of the day. I reached an answering service & a gentleman who worked there, but could not give any information to me. Mr. Brownlee did return one of my calls, I was out, but Would not give any information. My reactions to all of the above would be that you should be very cautious in any continued working relationship with them. My experience tells me they are a small development company trying to look big to out of state "smaller" towns, In most cases the developer takes it upon themselves for any and all costs related to a project. If Hudson is willing to Joint Venture a project, you would not have to look far for a developer to work with. It would be a very "sweet deal" for a residential Real Estate developer to walk into. 00T 2 4 1984 L • EXL1-6,i- L Weld Co. Planning Cnmmission August 8, 1984 Page Two My recommendation is to drop Nautica, determine what you would like to happen- in Hudson and then find a local developer to work with. If you have any further needs or questions please feel free to call. Please forward the agreed upon fee at you convenience. Sincerely, MOUNTAIN WEST-MORTGAGE CORP. Robert C. Boot RCB:kw Date: April 2, 1985 CASE NUMBER: Z-418:85:4 NAME: Greater Hudson Development Company ADDRESS: c/o Lee Murata, 13877 Highway 52, Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 REQUEST: A Change of Zone fromAgricultural ri Recreational Use ultral to Planned Uses) . Development (R-1, R-4, C-3, Agricultural LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parts of Sections 33 and 34, T2N, and parts of Sections 2 and 3, T1N, all in R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent and north of Hudson town limits; north of State Highway 52 and 1-76, east of Weld County Road 41. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. It is the opinion of the Department of planning Services staff that the applicant has failed to demonstrate in written or oral statements to date that the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan addresses residential and commercial development with the following policy statements: A) Residential Policy #1 on Page 59 states: "New residential developments which are not closely connected to and served by municipal utilities and services shall be discouraged." The proposed Planned Unit Development District would be a 1,089 acre site adjacent to the town of Hudson for a distance of one-fourth (1/4) mile on the town's northern boundary. The town of Hudson should provide services becasue of the proximity to the town and the proposed Planned Unit Development's need for urban services. B) Residential Policy #2 on Pages 59 and 60 states: "Proposals for new residential development adjoining existing municipalities shall be encouraged so long as they conform to the desires of the towns as expressed in their comprehensive plans." The proposed Planned Unit Development District is not compatible with Hudson's Comprehensive Plan, and the town has expressed a desire to work on an annexation plan and future rezoning of the property with the applicant. Z-418:85:4 Greater Hudson Development Company Page 2 C) Residential Policy #3 on Page 60 states: "Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments and will be looked to for service of all new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality." The proposed Planned Unit Development District would eventually contain an estimated 1,167 residential units with an estimated base population of 3,641 people. The Weld County Tax base should not be expected to support law enforcement expenses, road maintenance, and other services for this urban development. D) The formation of separate water and sewer services as proposed in the application materials is not consistent with the following policy statement as set forth on Pages 91 and 92 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan: "Proliferation of service districts shall be opposed while consolidation of existing service districts shall be encouraged when it tends to improve the efficiency and economy of the service." In order to comply -with this policy, the proposed water and sewer services should be provided by the districts now serving the town of Hudson. If necessary, those districts should be upgraded in order to accomplish the additional burden of service. F) Commercial Policy #1 on Page 61 states: "Commercial development will not be encouraged in the unincorporated areas of the County unless it can be shown by the developer that the proposed commercial use cannot reasonably he located in an urban area." Z-418:85:4 Greater Hudson Development Company Page 3 The applicant has failed to demonstrate in written materials or oral statements to date that the proposed Planned Unit Development cannot be located in an urban area. It is staff's opinion because of the physical location, the size, and potential impacts to the town of Hudson that the applicant reach agreements with the town of Hudson and locate the proposal in accordance with the town's Comprehensive Plan. This process should also involve the applicant working with the town of Hudson to amend its Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. IT. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the applicant has failed to demonstrate in written or oral statements to date that the uses which would be permitted shall be compatible with the future development as protected by the Hudson Comprehensive Plan. The town of Hudson has indicated in letters dating March 10, 1985, and March 13, 1985, that: A) The proposed rezoning is not compatible with Hudson's Comprehensive Plan (see Document I) ; B) The town of Hudson would like the developers to complete their petition for annexation, and the town would prefer to have the privilege of zoning after annexation (see Document II) ; and C) The town -of Hudson will not provide municipal services to areas outside of town boundaries (see Document II) . Dacu me..YF- I Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 March 10 ,19tS5 Please find below the town of Hudson' s concerns pertaining to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, the town of Hudson, and the proposed development of Hudson Garden Village : Policy #2 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan concerning residential development states : Proposals for new residential development adjoining existing municipalities shall be encouraged so long as they conform to the desires of the towns as expressed in their comprehensive plans . The town of Hudson responds to this as follows : (a) According to the Hudson Comprehensive Plan on page 67 , #7 , . "Future Plans are to. . . .Designate residential development to areas south , east , and west and an orderly process of phasing annexation. " The proposal for County rezoning is in an area NORTH of Hudson. The area immediately southeast of the proposed area designated for rezoning is for a future land use of industrial in the Hudson Comprehensive Flan. (see map #7) (b) In keeping with the Weld County Comprehensive plan the Hud -on Comprehensive Plan designates that . . . "all future development for annexation purposes shall be discouraged on prime agricultural land. " (pave 67 , #6 , also, see map #6) A section of the proposed area for rezoning is prime agricultural land. (also see letter dated 10-18-84 from Platte Valley Soil Conservation District) (c) Page 68 of Hudsons Comprehensive Plan specifies a break- down of future land use. The future plan is to allow only 3% of all residential dwelling units to be mobile homes . If the developers plan on using mobile homes as specified during an earlier meeting with the town of Hudson, this would far exceed the comprehensive plans land use plans. Also, page 67 specifies the town of Hudson' s policy for designating sufficient land for residential , commercial and industrial uses to encourage even amount of growth. DocuMe,31=I March 10 , 1985 page 2 Policy "3 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan concerning residential development states : Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments and will'_be looked to for service of all new development within their corporate areas , in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation but within a resonable service distance from the municipality. The town of Hudson responds as follows : (a) This is in direct conflict with the town' s Annexation Ordinance which states in Section II , #1 , to extend no municipal services to areas outside of the boundaries of the town. (b) It is not reasonable to ask the taxpayers of the town of Hudson to extend municipal services to areas not within the town boundaries without the benefit of tax dollars from said areas to pay for these services. Policy #1 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan concerning utilities , public goods , and services states : Any development that will create an undue burden on existing public facilities and will diminish the capacity of public agencies to maintain the existing level of service shall be discouraged. The town of Hudson responds as follows : (a) The town of Hudson would not be able to provide any municipal services to the proposed area for rezoning without causing the town undue hardship. however, the developers would choose to work with the town and petition for annexation, these services could be provided. — 00cunnea-f- Z Ma 7 • £[QWNLOFHD SO F N 1 Itnntnnrnmmnmmmnmn'...�....._.....—^----- Ill - MI ....,...... ,•� f SEVENTH AVENUE ___ � �`� III IIIP 1111111 8111188 I(fi11 — - _ IHIflIIII�888: i 111111�'181 111111 - rA•F 4 11 ILIBII (. �1111111II ( j Ilili,,11,iwiwi ii� IIII III1111116II t�'�1i, .��11�, ti1l't'�1 h y»`��(�III 11111 ! ! IMO! f /- , �, C �; t,., "• I t l III' IMO'II(IIIIIIIII HMI I kk101�.A\vy1 \ :::•r')('. :r.\''1?, Am; px AVENUE ., .r ,} L 11 , 1 I s ,, I :1111111 I"1W 111 ��' ! .f i,ti.,±� ,`I 1";.x+�, ,! : s... nuuuii k Iflllllili UIIIII K1 r. �i rf i`' 1 ' '',•� . � ' tip �.. .. TT I tit ,� �. ' .,� IIIIIIIII �S • ,� �� IIII: 1{ w Iilll �I►II , VIII .-.r- � I hill 1 i, eI 11111!11 1 IIII: !III {'VIII E . j i �� II I�ii11;� (i S III( � 1 IIIii 'O MIT'I I IIII I 111E 1.111((1 4;'r !IIII III' HE 11111 .un1•n li! r, z ::t# : qI 111111• rill" �R} h111,1m11„ !l Jy:l•ila .IIII inntnii: MAIN r STREET HI ' ' iM1111111fl1111111111 '8 I8I:I IIII .� II :�:::>Y;Y:'<;i`:�:::;:>..•...v.'^"^^. 8181 I : 8 _ : :>:>: :>:»y........r... 1 ►1111 l ..-.. hill `i I�� h �f= � II � >:>;:E. : I IIII III II ,.�::::IIIIIII811C II III. 8,f� 11818181�IIIIIIIIIII ::. FIFTH i / .it . AVEN:: p;-EUE), W EI N .. :`''5';f`;:`at'::t::FG::a:::>ur'.�'`..: r<` — 1 k ] 5 [i[J ,LiTly. ..i.. J'c _.Y.: V.. H 1S ....-"7.........:,....-..."'":•'. : ,......., ,, i�i5:�ittF:;55��t�it`t�`�:�it;t;555t;5.:'.:�.ref• - :N «•N '• A' IQ r w } M+• ........:....14.,_ r r 1 •�� t .• r b .1 l • ! IP /' . • ge • L ......•... THIRD AY -•.•.•i�M. •!;'.•�1.•:• .�.;'.;...,'":":„.,""--",....._...._„,"`f: . • • • • • i 1`1. C: ni Ti[-i. ...... / 'T , I ` • • • ■ AVENUE i:::;;i •>'::.: ......:Y>:<�if ::::. f S I ■ ■ r. ■ .a.�:.: .:e4;;.�' >:<t<t;;;;.;..;t�;.;. •.;. '.. :•ate' ::::;{:;:'Cit:>:;t t2':.;:;:;:''t;,;.; ✓: t.t;.; AVENUE J ,,,,, J,. • t ... �;,;;;,;;:;?;R':'2`:i:;:;:•`.:>;:::;y:;:':;:;}:;111''..:} Liu : .;y::};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;"`l:':!:''t:5>tt;t5't:�12':':'.w, r, , r Ta III 1111 1111 111 1 1 11.11. 1 I u 1 1 n 1. 1 1•�,�,�,•...:.:::::::::..�},:::'�:.:1'.11111111.111111111111111111 1•:. ...,ww•':�::�::�:':::•::�:�•::'::�::.: ::'::�::.tti:tt'::•:::::::�::t:�::;:•::t:�:"::� ��111�11111111�111�111111111 11111 11111........ ......:.....:::......:......:......:.......:......::.......::....::......::......�......::.... 111..... 4//1IIt:::`::;:+.:>:;::;:�:»:•»•::.::<�:::.�:;:<:.::;s:»•.:�:•>:•:�'.�::o:>;:.:«: / .�.....�;:: •:<•::�>Yi�:' :•:�:::• :•:�:+>::,:y•::'>:•:�':�r::�$?�•:» y::�>::�:?:::''{>Y:•:t t:;:;>?::::::�$`:�:•Y:.;:;:j.:':::::+.�':<•>:•:;�`:•::is>:t ttt< :�>:�:�>;:;:•Y?S:::t:;:t :•:t�$:?>:•:>:i?�'::{ttC�;l:•>:�»f:2:•:t•>:•>S�'):•:�:�::.. • • • • Pu blic c Sin I & t ............ ...,,.._...,_,.. e Fa mily 9 I Y M Quasi Public {:. ri ;�: Multi-Family ; Parks & Recreation IIII III Commercial ri Agriculture SEMI IN FEET Doccowa- • Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 March 13 , 1985 Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attn: Mike Mullen Re : Greater Hudson Development Planned Unit Development Dear Mr. Mullen: Thank you for your consideration of the town of Hudson' s interests concerning the above proposed rezoning. The town of Hudson is opposed to the rezoning of the above due to the following reasons : 1 . The proposed rezoning is not compatable with Hudson' s Comprehensive Flan. 2 . The town of Hudson would like the developers to complete their petition for annexation. The town would prefer to have t would hivilege of zoning after annexation. It difficult to annex land that was not compatable with the town of Hudson' s Comprehensive Plan. 3 . The town of Hudson will not provide municipal services to areas outside of the town boundaries . 4. Weld County can not afford to provide municipal services for the proposed development. (Snow removal would be very cumbersome , not to mention animal control , etc 5. The developers should strive to develope a positive working relationship with the town of Hudson and file a completed petitroion after (or and allow the town to zone the p P 3 during) annexation. Enclosed please find: 1 . Documentation supporting the town of Hudson's striving for a positive working relationship with tocumeArt- Town of Hudson PHONE: (303)536-4735 609 CEDAR ST. P.O. BOX 351 March 13 , 1985 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 page 2 the developers . (Summary of all documented activity) 2. The sections never completed on the developers petition for annexation. 3. Comments pertaining to the proposed rezoning not being compatable with Hudson' s Comprehensive Plan. 4. Previous correspondence from the town of Huason pertaining to the proposal of rezoning during the first phase . All in all , the town agrees with what Mr. James R. Niayerl stated in his letter to the developers on Nov. 20 , 1984, that the . . . "Department of Planning Services recommends that the developers establish and maintain a positive working relation- ship with the town of Hudson conformance to the town' s desires as expressed in their comprehensive plan is one of the residential growth policies of the Weld County Comprehen- sive Plan." Sincerely, The Trustees of the Town of Hu'son o1 W(4- ‘1 i Susan Worth , P-ayor Trustee Trustee IL (2 VO7.61- )..\ Trustee Trustee Trustee enclosures DacameArfr Z The following secticns of the Municipal Act of 1965 need to be completed regarding the annexation petition from the Greater Hudson Development Company: (as of March 10 ,1985) 31-12-104: #b 31-12-105: #a, #b 31-12-107 : #la, #lc(I thru III ) , #4, #7 The following sections of Hudson' s Annexation Ordinance 84-1 need to be completed regarding the above annexation petition as of March 10 ,1985: Section III : #2 , #4 Section IV: #2 , #3 , #4, #6cdef, #7a,b,c,d,e, f, #8 , #9 Section V: #2 Appendix I : all incomplete Appendix II : all incomplete (prepared by Susan Worth) OOCL(MteriL March 10 ,1985 The following is a summary of the interaction between the various groups and/or companies Mr. Lee Murata has represented and the Trustees of the Town of Hudson: July 1983 - Colorad.o Turf Club approached Hudson Board of Trustees concerning a proposed harness racetrack. Gary Kennedy was representing Colorado Turf Cllub during this phase. *July 1983 - A letter was sent to the Colorado Racing Commission concerning the possibility of establishing a harness raceway in the Hudson area and expressing support thereof. (see attached ) *Aug. 1983 - Letters sent to Mr. and Mrs . Ralph E. Krause , Fritchle and Company, and Mr. and Mrs . Ernest Conway by Ms . Sandra Boilers , Mayor Fro-tem, requesting that they seek annexation as to allow the land for the proposed harness race track to be contiguous to the town of Hudson. (see attached) *Aug. 1983 - A letter to anyone concerned with the proposed annexation was composed by Sandra Rollers . (See attached) *0ct. 7 ,1983 - See attached notes from a conversation Mayor Sandra Boilers had with Mr. Murata. Please note #12 concerning services . It appears Colorado Turf was willing to turn over all services to the town of Hudson. Nov. 1983 - An incompleted petition for annexation of Colorado Raceway Estates was presented to the town of Hudson. Dec. 14 ,1983 - Public Hearing concerning Colorado Turf, Inc. , and the proposed Colorado Harness Raceway. Carl Kennedy and Earl Kennedy were present representing Colorado Turf, Inc. Jan. 1984 - Documentation concerning a parcel of land which is of Section 3 , Township 1 , Range 65, was presented to the town of Hudson. This parcel appears like it could be still within the town limits of Hudson. If so , it would make it easier to annex the proposed area for Colorado Harness Raceway. Jan. 5,1984 - Special meeting of Town Trustees , Planning Board , Sewer Board with Gary Kennedy, DeeDee Mathew - Planner for Mobile Home Park, Richard Brownlee - Head of Development Company, -Philip Niernberg, Mark Niernberg, and. LPe Murata. a) Gary Kennedy had called this special meeting to help start a working relationship between the developers and the different town boards they would be working with. b) An overview of the mobile home project was given. c) Mr. Mathews wanted a decision that night on whether the town would annex or not. (This was the first meeting, please note ) *Feb. 29,1984 - Hudson Town Council Workshop of 2-29-84. Lee Murata was present. See attached copy of minutes . Have attached documentation JJocalme, i IC March 10 ,1985 page 2 of summary April 4,1984 - Completion of proof that the parcel of land mentioned in Jan. 1984 is still within the town limits of Hudson. The town at this time refers to the developers as the Greater Hudson Development Company. May 4,1984 - Incomplete petition for annexation submitted to the town of Hudson by the Greater Hudson Development Company. May 15, 1984 - Letter sent to Lee Murata of the Greater Hudson Development Company concerning their lack of payment of legal fees and expenses the town had incurred on their behalf. It was explained that this is a standard part of Hudson' s annexation ordinance. May 19,1984 - Letter from town of Hudson to Lee Murata of the Greater Hudson Development Co. inquiring specifically as to what type of development is proposed . May 21 ,1984 - Town of Hudson Trustee meeting with David Brown, water attorney, Cindy Eley, general town attorney, and Sue Birch , land attorney, concerning proposed annexation. *May 24,1984 - Lee Murata and Richard Brownleeiattended this workshop of the town of Hudson' s board of Trustees . (see attached) *June 11 ,1984 - Date of letter received from Lee Murata responding to Hudson' s letter of 5-19. The master plan referred to in the letter wet picked up by the Greater Hudson Development Company and never returned . There has yet to be a master plan on file from the Greater Hudson Development Company at the. town hall of Hudson. July 17 ,1984 - Letter from Hudson's water attorney, David Brown, regarding a meeting with David Robbins , the developer!s water attorney. Aug 8,198E - Copy of letter of a background study of Nautica Investment Company conducted by Mountain West Mortgage Company was received from the Hudson Sanitation District. The firm advised the Sanitation District not to work with Nautica. *Aug. 28 ,1984 - Letter to Nautica Investment, Inc. , stating the town of Hudson would not discuss annexation any further until all expenses the town had incurred on Nautic' s behalf were paid in full. Aug. 29,1985 - Letter from David Brown, Hudson's water attorney, regarding an application of Greater Hudson Development Company in seeking to change the use of its Laramie-Fox Hills conditional water right from irrigation to municipal , commercial , industrial , etc. . . to serve some part of the purposed development. The town of Hudson filed no objection. *Augu 23 ,1984 - David Robbins , water attorney for the developers, , and Lee Murata attended Trustee workshop. Aug., 311;1,984Y6- .Letter' received from David Robbins , developer' s water attorney, along with a check to-cover past expense indebtness due the town from 12-31-83 through 8-1-84. Daces e,. - IL March 10,1985 page 3 of summary Nov. 1984 - Nautica Investments , or, Greater Hudson Development Company choose to stop annexation procedures and began petitioning rezoning through the County Planning Office of WeldCounty. Nov. 1984 - Letter and check from David Robbins regarding payment for legal services incurred by the town of Hudson on the developer' s behalf. *Mar. 1985 - Letter from Lee Murata concerning desire to work once again with the town of Hudson on annexation. Letter -was somewhat contradictory since it stated that the developers were working with the county on petitioning for rezoning. Mar. 8 ,1985 - Mayer Worth invited Mr. Murata to Hudson Trustee meeting of Mardi 13. Worth asked Mr. Murata to inform town of exactly what Mr. Murata wished to discuss at this meeting. • • • COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 Department of Regolttrny Agencies 152S Sherman Street C1envor,(..tor,::I,,&0203 „S// A:'gte.t I. Ma.i iolra t0?1 866-?294 • iJ*� Executive S ,rt t trs s r1'ri �8* 76� Richard D.lain,. Governor September 13, 1983 Wellington E. Webb Executive Director. Mr. Edward O. Geer Attorney at Law 1625 Broadway, Suite 1460 Denver, Colorado 80202 Dear Ed: This is to acknowledge the receipt of an application which you filed on behalf of Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. I presented this application to the Commission at yesterday's regularly scheduled meeting and they have set this matter for preliminary discussion on the October 3, 1983 meeting agenda. The Commission further advised that it will be necessary for you to file a check in the amount of $1 ,000 for the purpose of investigating the application. I want to inform you that the Commission race date hearing is scheduled for October 12, 1983 and should you need further information regarding this meeting, please let me know. Ed, if there is anything at all that I can do for you, please don't hesitate to ask. Kindest regards, COLORADO RACING COMMISSION AUGUST J. CIOTRA Executive Secretary cc: Commission Hector Rene Ramirez Lee Murata • /\I y72/ EDWARD 0. GEER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1625 BROADWAY SUITE 1460 DENVER.COLORADO 60202 EDWARD O.GEER TELEPHONE R vvvvvvw September 14, 1983 AREA CODE 303 xleXlt4tx 595-0400 Weld County Clerk & Recorder Centennial Building 9th Ave . & 9th St. Greeley, CO 80631 Re : Trade Name Affidavit Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed herein a Trade Name Affidavit for Colorado Harness Raceway. I have also enclosed a check for $10. 00 for the fee. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours , Edward 0. Geer EOG:nco enclosure cc : Lee Murata STATE 01— COLORADO COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 ,„.co Department of Regulatory Agencies 1525 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80203 t% ' August J. Masciotra (303) 666-2294 +��_� �/r Executive Secretary \•187%w � 876♦ October 5, 1983 Richard D.Lamm Governor Wellington E. Webb Executive Director Mr. Lee Murata, President Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: At the regularly scheduled October meeting conducted by the Colorado Racing Commission, the racetrack application received on behalf of Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. was addressed. The Commission, after reviewing this application, voted to set a hearing date for December 15, 1983 at 9:30 a.m. at the Pepperpod Restaurant in Hudson, Colorado for consideration of Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. ' s application. The Commission directed that you or a representative from your corporation post the required notices at the racetrack site and include these notices in a newspaper or publication in that area. We request that you work with Mr. Arthur Doll, our Security Coordinator, to enable him to conduct his background investigation on the application. Please be advised that the Commission did acknowledge receipt of the $1,000 investigatory fee as is required by law. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please don' t hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, COLORADO RACING COMMISSION 4,4 .24.4„ AUGUST J. MASCIOTRA Executive Secretary cc: Gary Kennedy Edward Geer Arthur Doll H. Rene Ramirez Commission STATE Or COLORADO COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 ";oFv •, Department of Regulatory Agencies Denver, Sherman Street N` Denver,-Colorado 80203 7Yii �g August J. Masciotra (303)866-2294 '14,W** Executive Secretary .476• Richard D. Lamm Governor Wellington E.Webb Executive Director October 24, 1983 Mr. Edward Geer Attorney at Law Colorado Harness Raceways, Inc. 1625 Broadway, Suite 1460 Denver, Colorado 80202 Dear Mr. Geer: The Colorado Racing Commission on October 12, 1983, approved the following envelope of 1984 race dates for Colorado Harness Raceways, Inc. : September 1 , 1984-December 30, 1984-(87 days) September 1 , 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30; October 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 ; November 1 , 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30; December 1 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 2.6, 27, 28, 29, 30 TENTATIVE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF LICENSE Sincerely, CO ORADO RACING COMMISSION A GUST J. MASCIOTRA EXECUTIVE SECRETARY STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 p;oFy Department of Regulatory Agencies 1525 Sherman Street qe s� \tRiNz Denver,Colorado 80203 (303)866-2294 August I. Masciotra y ^ ' r .1876 Executive Secretary /976 Richard D. Lamm N 0 T I C E Governor Wellington E.Webb Executive Director Notice is hereby given that the Colorado Racing Commission will conduct public hearings for the purpose of considering applications for new race meets as follows: November 10, 1983 Applicant: Pikes Peak Racetrack Development Corporation Location: Municipal Building 110 South Main Foutain, Colorado Time: 10:00 a.m. December 15, 1983 Applicant: Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. Location: The Pepper Pod Restaurant • 530 Fir Street Hudson, Colorado Time: 9:30 a.m. December 16, 1983 Applicant: Colorado Jockey Club Location: Weld County Centennial Complex First Floor Assembly Room 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado Time: 9:30 a.m. All interested persons are invited to -attend the public hearings and anyone who desires to present testimony will be required to register their name with the Commission prior to the commencement of each hearing. DATED this 18th day of October, 1983. BY ORDER OF THE COLORADO RACING COMMISSION AUGUST J. MASCIOTRA, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EDWARD 0. GEER fttrafkikefitkic ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1625 BROADWAY SUITE 1460 DENVER,COLORADO 50202 EDWARD 0 GEER TELEPHONE Xa4AXNAXWAXW AREA CODE 30S 7ii00 MMX Oct. 10, 1983 595-0400 Colorado Racing Commission Room 110 1525 Sherman St. Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: 1984 Race Dates For Colorado Harness Raceway, Inc. Gentlemen: Please find herein, on behalf of the above applicant, desired race dates for 1984: 1. Sept. 1, 2,4,6,7, 8,9, 12,13,14,15,16,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28,29, 30., 2. Oct. 3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12, 13,14,17,18,19, 20, 21, 24,25, 26, 27, 28, 31. 3. Nov. 1, 2,3,4,7,8,9,10,13, 14,15,16,17,18, 21, 22,23, 24, 25, 28, 29,30. 4. Dec. 1,4,5,6,7, 8,9,12,13,14,15, 16, 19,20, 21, 22, 23,26,27, 28, 29,30. The above suggested racing programs number 87, and the applicant at the discretion of the Racing Commission, would respectfully request that 3 additional programs be granted by adding 3 matinees on 3 of the Saturday night programs. Thank you for all of the past courtesies and your consideration of these proposed dates. lVery truly yours, ��/dward O. Geer CC . Lee Murata, President FFor the Applicant) Gary Kennedy, Vice Pres. ET°CTL OF COLO '.AD COLORADO RAMC, COMMISSION Room 110 x%ft 1OO1 1525 Sherman Street ten � .r Denver,Colorado 80203 .� ,��•/ 1303)8662294 •ie_v e j ALLOTTED 1984 RACE DATES GREYHOUND Interstate Kennel Club (Byers) November 28, 1983 - February 29, 1984 (76 days - includes 2 charity days) Cloverleaf Kennel Club (Loveland) March 1 . 1984 - May 31 , 1984 (76 days - includes 2 charity days) Pueblo Kennel Association May 1 , 1984 - August 11 1984 (Pueblo), (74 days - includes 2 charity days) Mile High Kennel Club June 1 , 1984 - August 28, 1984 (Commerce City) (76 days - includes 2 charity days) Rocky Mountain Greyhound August 29, 1984 - November 24? 1984 Park (Colorado Springs) (73 days - includes 1 charity day) Grand Mesa Kennel Club (Fruita) ** July 1 , 1984 - December 10, 1984 (74 days - includes 2 charity days) FAIR CIRCUIT** Southwestern Equine Assn. March 17, 1984 - April 1 , 1984 ( 6 days) (Trinidad) March 17,18;24,25;31 ;APril 1 Gateway Downs (Holly) April 7, 1984 - May 6, 1984 (10 days) April 7,8;14,15;21 ,22;28,29;May 5,6 Akron Downs (Akron) May 12, 1984 - May 28, 1984 ( 7 days) May 12,13;19,20;26,27,28 Moffat County Raceways (Craig) June 2, 1984 - June 17, 1984 ( 7 days) June 2,3;8,9,10;16,17 Western Slope Race Assn. (Rifle) June 23, 1984 - July 8, 1984 ( 7 days) June 23,24;30;July 1 ;4;7,8 Sky Ute Downs* (Ignacio) July 13, 1984 - July 22, 1984 ( 6 days) July 13,14,15;20,21 ,22 Navajo Trail Fiesta (Durango) July 27, 1984 - August 5, 1984 ( 6 days) July 27,28,29;August 3,4,5 Uranium Downs (Grand Junction) September 8, 1984 - October 14, 1984 September 8,9;15,16;22,23;29,30; (12 days) October 6,7;13,14 * TENTATIVE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF LICENSE. **SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS (Continued on reverse side) 10/83 HORSE Arapahoe Park (Aurora) May 4, 1984 - November 11 , 1984 Sumer and Fall Thoroughbred -- 96 days Alay 4, 5, 6, 9. 11 , 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30; June 1 , 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30; July 1 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29; August 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 31 ; Sep- tember 1 , 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21 , 22, 23, 26, 28, 29, 30 Mixed Meet -- 24 days October 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21 , 24, 26, 27, 28, 31 ; November 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 Total - 120 days Pikes Peak Meadows** (Fountain) May 12, 1984 - November 4, 1984 - (72 days) May 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28; June 1 , 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 29, 30; July 1 , 4, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21 , 22, 27, 28, 29; August 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 , 12; September 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 21 , 22, 23, 28, 29, 30; October 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 , 26, 27, 28; November 2, 3, 4 includes 1 charity day Colorado Harness September 1 , 1984-December 30, 1984-(87 days) Raceways, Inc.** (Hudson) September 1 , 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30; October 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 ; November 1 , 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21 , 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30; December 1 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21 , 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 **TENTATIVE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF LICENSE * * * * * * �1 STATE Or COLORADO COLORADO RACING COMMISSION Room 110 e of•Coto Department of Regulatory Agencies 1525 Sherman Street '"y Denver,Colorado 80203 y c LL' August). Masciotra (303) 866-2294 Executive Secietary 876 December 19, 1983 Richard D.Lamm Governor Wellington E.Webb Executive Director Mr. Lee Murata, President Colorado Harness Raceways, Inc. 13877 Highway 52 Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Dear Mr. Murata: This is to officially inform you that the Colorado Racing Commission vacated the scheduled hearing date of December 15, 1983 for the license hearing on Colorado Harness Raceways, Inc. The Commission will reset this hearing upon receipt of a request from you so stating your intentions to proceed. You will need to outline, at that time, what remedies you have devised to solve the forty mile statu- tory prohibition for race dates. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, COLORADO RACING COMMISSION .:7---1-2 . ier e...1-0.1L_- A GUST J. MASCIOTRA Executive Secretary cc: Commission H. Rene Ramirez r, a/6�� eg. _ a='a),.figs C' 2e4, � Ns--0574, 3— ce OTC 27' 2-2 -71--- l • -4 ' +�c.s� a im _�.- 2-a-9 ,s- _ 5L fl_- I .e - 2 2� — 1� /)� ,•� k,to r y? C S r ✓_Z '_ ` ?-0" :Y----7.> -S: c-1. — l ta =5,:)fC - 2f-'2-96 • ., —',°- c' � — SQL /r 1, /y 3" r/ 1L t.C t- as 8 i/ We P- /(0 ,41 t- 3- =C 1 CR/-17 11t ≤oit ,-V5 . / W _-Q2-9 i � ,Z? 2 4. ----'21 __gr ;�, . _:;?.:2_32 C J 9 . 3 ±/ s2 q v L' Cl,C1/1 - l Si; ,,. . `1_,/±=5:1:_6f - &4;6;c- O Vg/95-- FTJ O iWLNT C L-,__. ION We, so unUersit;ned Weld County, Colorado, citizens citizf.ns rsiding in the cudson real se hereby oppoued to the rezoning of the proposer) develor.mnt of NnUson 3cren Village from agricultural to residential/commercial. Me -l.m of iludson has this area siJecified n:, :a future zoning of industrial in `W e comprehensive plan. 1 7 �� _ l S SS' i,-1, 111/6 iciso/, 64, `J S1 - t�iL 4A_ L /3&-C/'z 76 /4 -'put 44.—c7 I 7— cF } _±4,,- ' . � '; ./. ( LILt f-( . h >i, %%-«c'. / 1 ' e2-s7 S;rrji /lacisan 3 - 16--1S-- 9. da Alta aia--4-1L /94 z - 97,i-eft lo. irks - /?),-.4?"C4('j & 7 7.4 11. ,lie . Am e.742 al i), 5// c 21) -P- 12. 11,,Z c /v S?7 Atl 3 7 El Lif,/O, 3 --z o--% .,e1-> ,, .,�,-_.a .572u/ S.2 Z4 3 ;3..-1� • l'l_, �- „- 2 0 ter t\ 1-lv�s -. 3 - z.1 �5 15. gig) i, Jdro, 3 o `-��_ 17. q4J 4,2C A77 e4cl W) a6on 41S It /- S 19. ;c. ./ TOW' OF HUDSON PETITION We , the undersigned citizens of the Town of Hudson, are hereby opposed to the rezoning of the proposed development of Hudson Garden Village from agricultural to residential/commercial. The Town of Hudson has this area specified as a future zoning of industrial in the comprehensive plan. NAME n 1g STREET ADDRESS DATE XT ?,)4,,titiA .2//9/8'5 4. ( ' '' /JI �c.c..e:k, _-z /9- S' yf 5. �/ W1- //'6 6-a-.c- CC° i;lt("k Were 2 - i y S 6. Iry (3 , .-c fel 7 . )) l // 7 3 2 iy - 2 , g s ' 8. r ,.,,-,-.1 i c, 6 e;,zA .s L- , .?- i (1 - E,s- 9. .4J1, 7,i 6 .3i - J - k'(frt i1 . Iiiiig XlaTIF //75 -0 ,1 _ C J ;2 - a - rS. 12. "f1.1!-1. -. 1�-Q- - �. b- _,. r'._'t. _ f l - 0,/, S y 13. ' ttiel#/{. adf* oU 7 44 dr CZ -O 5-P.-5 14 2? X11'4/ 116.- 2__._� 6- ?S 15. C. Y .;•1 '- -% ;A y --- , s? -5'16, _ _ 3 a.-- 6-eAze" „.. ) , 17, /4..6/.( «,/ ' ' i . ____.__ - 7 -i ;) •r. .t_�_/1-(:...1,-,.r:1.Z. ' �f....r. i� � -+.:_K-.g.r!----.---3....:....:1:..-------j. 19. /_.- ,P<``.. t i-i ` // -7._/.2 /"/'ILI, z.. �� - / -- � 20. .._____ • 21 . _ _.r.________.._ • 22., 23.. ____.___.._._._.-_ TOWN OF HUDSON PETITION We , the undersigned citizens of the Town of Hudson, are hereby opposed to the rezoning of the proposed development of Hudson Garden Village from agricultural to residential/commercial . The Town of Hudson has this area specified as a future zoning of industrial in the comprehensive plan. NAME STREET ADDRESS DATE 2.6' t �_.1 .� --1-1:e_ -3&E-e h l'1 v ci S'o - t qi - g'S`• 21-,-1 • ite,_,- j--3(44:' ' ;;24.74:247. --- q -4). ?; 4/.. 7/6( 24 (S .5 .---. - - Z6-I hjaii-eit- IV7/ S-4kati-C, , /i 9/ .-jD 6. j tic .2-91""a .1-41�' 7 . 2UtiA _, D yc- 2r 8. /-P ar._ -2____ _. 2 9, (--)..,<.• :,),2,„.L..., •YY.2 eVe „ y 92 7 '1 4-i-QP.1 - 10• . v' ) /`'.e.r, / „,_, ,/,',/,2' i J d i - 11 . /2;)'1''x'1-m-J ( QA 1 ab `� -- e2tif g_.__• 12 / '�-�-6 __-�-- e _._ 3 (21 �/`-/-- 13. C "' -✓ _____L.,4z j �- -2 5 14. , 4-/dy CArfs P (/ ' c:cd - 171-: ------- 1 5 j-_)-7 -ei . ,,- __ , -, i -45- lb 17 !J 1 .._ �� ►� .±.1.t.,.- .1. ‘ .b..\). 4-N.:-A.- 1 -c _. `Z 18. �,,� `,� 'k?L,.C..._ L`I.', r ter. __ 2 . ..VL.�� - /I.�. — _!' 19. � .. 41 6 5 A E S')- j /OA / 105 .. "•�— =='=��' � c 4_ l� y 2 TOWP1 OF HUDSON PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of the Town of Hudson, are hereby opposed to the rezoning of the proposed development of Hudson Garden Village from agricultural to residential/commercial. The Town of Hudson has this area specified as a future zoning of industrial in the comprehensive plan. NAME STREET ADDRESS DATE (71 . 7_4 g rie. 44),./gie r � 2 / * . r 7 . 8 . 9. , 1 0 . , 11 . . • 12 . 1j. . 14, ►r—,,�, ----_---------- 1 `. • 16 , 17 ,. 18.x_.__..-- 19. _ 20. � 21 , 22. 23. =ON 7ITITICN We, the urderi6ned .:eld County, Celor tr)o, citi.'F:ls residing in the Hudso n son • raa r:re hereby or :c;;ed to the rezoning of the pro,-o:sed develor;ment of 'u3son Garden Jill-,ge from -Agricultural to recddential/ccn:wercia1. The Town of Hudson has this are.+. si: cified a:., ;?. future zon ne; of industrial in the comprehensive plan. . .. .E ar_..tea K .2ESS DATE . cow CEa� -/-gs_ Pri...ralAd .---c-deAts--1,--._7 7/V Cada},} 0/P- icD - `— o G. 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 1(1. 17. 1E. )9. 0. 21. 22. 23. PETITION HUDSON !::?'r:a :..,..:I:i's,'�'T;:, ..,T I'rICld We, the undersioled . eld County, Color «o, citi7.ens residing in the Hudson :rea are hereby opposed to the rezoning of the proposed development of Hudson Garden Village from agricultural to residential/commercial. The Town of Hudson has this area specified as a future zoning of industrial in the comprehensive plan. NAME i R EE ADDRESS DATE 1. ./1'. 6.1"/"?. '_�/,:e7t`f -.xC7L 2,2 / ��GkC i'�'. . • G. �,/` �� ! } tit ft ��t /' ,S 4• 1)-/47't,r(� ✓�.+� .S tj /a �:�,L• /%5-- . 5. '1 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23 24. AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural mil ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado MNS ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . y , / DATE: ( � l4 J � SIGiIED; . .x or, Cl . (/ eG,�a �i�. The fopegoing instrumen was acknowledged before this //2 day of /1,4„ ,-. A.D, 1905 . Witness my hand seal . _e Y b is , ../Z) o ar // //�' Oz Z - ' r1-4,47, /7, C7 My Commission Expires : /1/4_7/C_7/C EXAe 6,`-P y/s/sr AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ,+/f I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (t/r I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this -project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. o DATE: 3// /,;erS— SIGNED: ^�L et 'y`J Th for going instrument w s acknowledgeefore this Alill! E ay of //72a_f/Q f6 A.D. 19 TA r Witness my hand seal . Notary ub c r 3 z z r L�jo7/c xf, C..m My Commission Expires : 72>� c �cc ea 3�i5—A /o v ei2 � ,,>°Ae -At AFFADAVIT I am .a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( V) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (/ ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project .and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE: - :117) -r\ SIGNED: The foregoing instrument w s acknowledged c before this . _day of / A.D.77rii / 19 9S Witness my hand seal . '/ _ . osary � � 4 �c>:�/� My Commission Expires : ////yes ��!_ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( l) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE : % 1_ .-;r /5.7 SIGNED: { / LL 1r_ The f regoing instrument was acknowledged before this < )O±--day of in/z /-< A.D. 191. Witness my hand seal . A / /� C1 NO ary b is �y 34.O9 dZa J L l yitve L, My Commission Expires : / ///'5/JS--- AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( / ) Pupal ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ; ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: - 39 5 i, SIGHED: x' : ! v The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 73 day of 072„,-,- , A.D. l9 E5,.. Witness my hand seal . a0 4-Cie ry c / C4'r My Commission Expires : ///,3/,x'5 �__ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( X ) rural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (A ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . „� DATE : L f; - �`.>-) SIGNED: ac ;� , 1 1 { C) The fo egoing instrument was acknowledged fore this day of A.D.mj ;," 19 Witness my hand seal . C /- U�_�lJ ido pry ub is �{. 4 n _ My Commission Expires : j x//7/75 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( A.f) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . �' t DATE: s /,k' // "� SIGNED: m , .� �y J yip . / < � The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this tA /� day of , A-04 A.D. 19W . Witness my hand seal . ll-e ,p// /G�i e� Z tari/a r J ,�'y6/% c ?a My Commission Expires : /�/� Y AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (� I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( L-1 I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County F.U.D. Zone changd. DATE : ,}- 47- /"7 SIGNED: / �� ( e� k (Tie_ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before the / J day of '2244-11‹ A.D. l9,L. Witness my hand seal . Notary Public My Commission Expires : S AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : ff ,� am City L ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( . I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : oe) s-s- SIGNED: /v .,, /.4-y, % The foregoing instrument��77 was acknowledged before this // / day of 4fr `1 A.D. 198 . Witness my hand seal . „t r./ Notary Puri r My Commission Expires : 7////cj k AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City (/ ) Dural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (I) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve • this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change. n _ -, n DATE : 3 O L 13 SIGNED: j,_ad , ,L') The for going instrument w s acknowledged before this y of 72---k2 ,,, 7 A.D. l9 i 71 Witness my hand seal . "9,-‘ , ./L V; Notary lc c:7 J t My Commission Expires : 0/j =j/ �_ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( y I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( k I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. �1 DATE: 1 -- '7 , SIGNED: ��` % The hl�f regoing instrument was acknowledged before this `Ot day of ri IarCA A.D. 19E. Witness my hand seal . lo ary rub c My Commission Expires : /////S,./' '3 — AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (� I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo (/ ) I am in favor of supporting the -proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . G ,,DATE : u ti '7 /S S SIGNED: �C/ �fj The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this (,5(.- day of ri!y7rrA A.D. 19?S Witness my hand seal . , _.• j` tar 1',r fh /6261C-14- 1---4. 7 J/vn , a J My Commission Expires : ////03/ 5 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( - ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( . ) I am in favor of supporting thee -proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. / DATE: ) j. ) 2 SIGNED: .7(47 C -�/ f / The f regoing instrument was acknowledged before this r\_;011-- day of fduoA Ck A.D. 197\ Witness my hand seal . - t ;,) No�ary lsubc /`� '� My Commission Expires : i / /A.BAS— _ _ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural _ I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE : 'J/'.) 0� /l�/ SIGNED: -2,sit. rr"r-m,r / C{", /1___,f'---- )) JC „t�=r7i� t The f9regoing instrument was acknowledged before this 51:22Eday ofne__.(,J A.D. 19 _ Witness my hand seal . ,� v , 4,, iJO ary �ub c 3zz ,C --za My Commission Expires : /A-03 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (ti.4 I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. � DATE : IVIHgeft 36 /g SIGNED: �n(L2 e /ill ttfly c. The f regoing instrument was acknowledged before this .day of �jT)r21r� A.D. 19157-- _ Witness my hand seal . �� AD d P 1 c / 4 3zz _cc � �"n, � c My Commission Expires : ////3/KM ___� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( VI' Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease ray home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( kr I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: f ' � • - SIGHED: /vgtyy( 6, j22 P The foregoing instrument w s acknowledged before this Q ) day of �� , A.D. 1915- Witness my hand seal . ,e2--(J so ary '%149, / My Commission Expires : /1 / /i5/gym— __ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (X ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( t) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE: 3 5C- SIGNED: -j ell;.y .%K' , - The fgregoing instrument was acknowledged p before this y day of inti—r' A A.D. �96�.1 Witness my hand seal . J o ary ub My Commission Expires : / /AC-5 /?\- AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (L.--)-- I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( L,- I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. 77 DATE: 7j-- 0- cc SIGNED: ci i0 y�,�Qetyt The f99regoing instrument was acknowledged before this " day of 1-O(2 rr / A.D. 19 .-15--:- Witness my hand seal . ief /tyC/ 1hjr 17 r /C,/7 r Ora My Commission Expires : / / // �/y,S __ �_, AFFADAVIT I am a resident of -Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( �) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: S 7 �j�SIGNED: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this VK j r— day of N -/ A.D. 1971, �/Witness my hand seal . N t r P�li# f/mt`�- C. �o ?Q/ My Commission Expires : 1�Ar AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( V) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( f I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE: -�' '%. SIGNED: ) 2 The foregoing instrume t was acknowledged before this ,77- day of 4- A .D. 19 . Witness my hand seal . Ca; i/7/""" �/ Notary Pub escti fir" 1oXp/ My Commission Expires : Y /r AFFADAVIT I -am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( xx) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ' ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development -Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . MALO FEED C JNPANY e- 7�z.4-> DATE: March 27, 1985 SIGNED: 1- d. .7-e-- ANET A. HALL, CORP. SECRETARY The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day of j-jat A.D. l9P- - Witness my hand seal . 7:?7 u2re Notary/ Public My Commission Expires : �J/)2' (5,43 29 ' AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Rural ( IC I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo O I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : J ebt /3— /7S-1'1-SIGNED: 47411:42/1/Lelur / The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this rte, day of l7-yl«-z-e A.D. 19 TS. Witness my hand seal . 6 < L� 7�c,�c/ d !7E- ;lotar Public My Commission Expires : }(" � L. AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( l( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County F.U.D. Zone change. DATE : � SIGNED: Ohl (C�2tt. (;Gi The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this / Eie day of �z �c > !�- A.D. l96" Witness my hand seal . � �� ` " �� ...be { ` � Notary Public My Commission Expires : )7ez S AFFADAV IT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE: .'.13;71/? %S fr SIGNED: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day o f >i<rt e- L- A.D. l9 r,5. Witness m hand seal c� i(� - `��J� Y • Notary public My Commission Expires : z, � AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (xe) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo (X) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: SIGNED : 'Act'', /77', The fpregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 5 ( day of -1 A.D. 19 .55. Witness my hand seal . � � �'-� a- )// iic,4 A — Notary Public / My Commission Expires : ' ° z � AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( '-3 I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area VI- I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (� } I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . /2L°i�/*' ,�\) SIGNED: ti DATE: � ,',c < --/AF. 1< _, The fgregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day of , f� a v�_ �< A.D. 198.5 . Witness my hand seal , ?�� °_r,_ - Lit- -0 "� Notary Public My Commission Expires : ° ' � � / 3 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( " ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the .proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : 2::7 / / SIGNED: kw- 7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day of A.D . l9(.151 Witness my hand seal . Notary Pu lic %/ My Commission Expires : AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ✓j Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : )SLIC 1 /5/ f SIGNED: f y✓ ��LY1,� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 73--- day of /Jl& yr/ A.D. 19F�. C H l 11, - Witness m L y hand seal , . 1<C ( � ' Notary Public / 71 etc My Commission Expires : AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ✓) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( t ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The (treater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . o DATE: _ SIGNED: �vu � G The foregoing instrumerat was acknowledged before this day of '/)4,L A.D. 19 c5 . Witness my hand seal . z-V /aiz� Notary ubLic /Af ec/� ��1�120 � C � c7 !/ My Commission Expires : / S AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City (\() Pural (/ ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo O I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: ( -L/ 2 / SIGNED : V/ . '- <I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this I day of V1/4 -e./ A .D. 19E, Witness my hand seal . jp7./A ,�- 4,a?cr 'ycJud' My Commission Expires : C� y AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( t-) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( L7 I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change. �J DATE: 3 - a ) - g(7/ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this -I/ day of A.D. 19-S5 Witness my hand seal . y �cL. _ ,�. ,.t< �— Notary Public 276,My Commission Expires : z `7 / `75 �^ AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( k-T} I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( c ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (\/ ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I an in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. , DATE: / - SIGNED: Cx-t � The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 2 / day of A.D. 19Ss . Witness my hand seal . ftfc. -- C 16- Notary Public My Commission Expires : 7Aa `� //8 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( x ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (X ) I rent/lease ray home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE: h112z A ( ,�� SIGNED: � :�Li� s .ul-zi The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 02 / day of 211xi/ A' A.D. l9J-5 E Witness my hand seal . '�1°� ` �1 C /111/ (2 - _ Notary Public My Commission Expires : �� ' � �� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Rural (5<; ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Coa1orado ( ›1j I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE:- �� i f-KAA1OIGNED: 33/! Q/SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day of }6,a z% A.D. 19-P' Witness my hand seal . � L�� % "" Notary Public My Commission Expires : ��%' ' 7 , X( AFFADAV IT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural (G/1 I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area (vs I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( j�'1 I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County F.U.D. Zone change. DATE : 3 - '5— SIGNED: G' Xi/ / ' -y The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this (2/ da-y of A.D. 1974 - Witness my hand seal . //(� �j (71// r otary`Pub;F ,f�4 G< 7v My Commission Expires : G / S AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area 4(>4:), I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : C3` %/g SIGNED: 13.441rI1-,-R The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this ,)J day of A_,./. A.D. l92-5 . Witness my hand seal . 2/71&%L� otar Pu�1 y,� /o syw it) 9" 74/ My Commission Expires : V ��y} AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City Pural ( ) I operate .a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( L) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( L Y I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE: 3 .4 7 ,J ) SIGNED: C C The f(egoing instrument was acknowledged before this r27 - day of s�c A.D. 1911:- Witness 4iitness my hand seal . 1/6 l °tarty Public -L C Pa 2d/ jai u, My Commission Expires : 6 y' AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( v Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( 171— I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: j — SIGNED: r /n_ ; , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b efore this /82-7day of 777Q/--GL A.D. l9�. Witness my hand seal . ___ o ary 3,72 i e-r-Itc, Li Wij4,n. My Commission Expires : /////145----- AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( 4 rural (4— - I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( C_L I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE : SIGNED: i / n X•hk, j' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this day of )/«<'z A.D. 19 IC Witness my hand seal . a Notary Public My Commission Expires : /'az / 7J� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( v// Pupal ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( � I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (y� I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo (� I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. 9aiirt+DATE : f 4 , SIGHED: L The foregoing inst ument /as acknowledged before this ( day of / � A.D. 19 . Witness my hand seal . �� L No-2,01 rib tt i2- My Commission Expires : / 3�� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( V Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( 4:4- I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: . \ \ <8 ' 5 SIGNED: .., 1 Ap.ATh 1-SA ` The fopegoing instrument was acknowledged before this y of /144r % A.D. l9x5• Witness my hand seal . lo ar ub LY c !!�� — 3ac /--, A . 1 �"✓,L .�,/n.f, e, My Commission Expires : /1/l,3AS AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) rural I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . a is DATE : 1114 /1, / d SIGNED: -- SD;/9 ?S' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this 3�j14� day of / bc_cc lc A.D. l9 1.E. Witness my hand seal . N3% P/ea it w My Commission Expires : / I/0/7 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( >1 I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( � ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE : , C— /b% SIGNED: -714-1 The foregoing ' / was acknowledged before this ay of �nrr A.D. 19 / � Witness my hand seal . No ary?b 32z , /e /7, L2-c,0 My Commission Expires : ii/i =3/1 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( Rural ( I-1- I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( /"--Y I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE : 3-73- 7) --- SIGNED: g4 o�(� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this /f day of Alar _A A.D. 19FcT Witness my hand seal . 1o(Th ary yo m _. 3z r My Commission Expires : ///j,34— AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ()<' ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . (774,4525 /4 DATE: �� ':', /4 SIGNED: - d'-��f'X -(ce /i741.-c.Y Kr- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this _a_102./day of MCLa C A.D. 19 $SC Witness my hand seal . xr / 1ppo�g rill /- f • 4 A,/, My Commission Expires : ////3/5'-)-- AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( )) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (/) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE: SIGNED: Aor" z1_t,/ ? � rYl: , The foregoing instrument war acknowledged before this day of 7,9a._t r i A.D . 19 I Witness my hand seal . 41"44- My Commission Expires : ii//r-345 AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pupal (22) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado csci I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE : 7 / 5- 4 SIGNED: ____ _ The foregoing instrument :as acknowledged before this / 5 day of 2-,2,-n/zz. A.D. 19 -5/1,") Witness my hand seal . Notary Public My Commission Expires : / /// 3/�� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Dural ()<) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) • I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo (A ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change . DATE : ,.f`(yy!•.rh It), et, SIGNED: Crcaw�� itt-A -1n9 d' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before this S day of -2' w c h A.D. l9�) Witness my hand seal . � Notary Public � — My Commission Expires : i///e3fr— AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( V) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( I) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE: ` )U — 0� SIGNED: it.-7,1,6_,„„, /'-i't i' T t ,› The fopegoing instrument w s acknowledged before this day of ,,,,C Q_ref- / A.D. 19 ? . Witness my hand seal . �_�/C ,--,- ,,,e Z) 10 ar , 3' 1 3z Y . ,/ t �g, ci — My Commission Expires : y /V3`j �_� AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( 7) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado ( ) I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. C DATE: 1 7/ J SIGHED: ,,,-7C c- `' is-✓ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before thinA 617 day of A.D./24=ui 19 VS. Witness my hand seal . tdotarlr c y V , C S-C 20/ My Commission Expires : 7A AFFADAVIT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City ( I ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (i, --)'"' I rent/lease my home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P .U.D. Zone change . DATE: 05/-7-F5 SIGNED: / Thef/pppregoing instrument ras acknowledged before this ` day of � jjj � A.D. 19a. Witness my hand seal . -e-e_e-C)) _ dtyI S27 ft.4 zer /cue 4 My Commission Expires : /i�/ 3�F5 "- _�___ AFFADAVTT I am a resident of Hudson, Colorado : City (✓ ) Pural ( ) I operate a business in Hudson, Colorado area ( ) I own my home or farm in Hudson, Colorado (,,_- ) I rent/lease ray home or farm in Hudson, Colo ( ) I am in favor of -supporting the proposed project for this community by The Greater Hudson Development Co . I request that the County Planning Commission approve this project and issue a County P.U.D. Zone change. DATE : 3 -i; c7 - ,7S SIGNED: ;«�, - f (i, The f going instrument was acknowledged efore this Y tra ay of c('-) A.D. l9 . Witness my hand seal . c-tt Al _z_fs/L{i otary iru :- /1�� ///,eceAz / 47,'/4, , e My Commission Expires : / y / "}j As Platte Valley Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 April 3, 1985 Mr. Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner Weld County Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number Z-418:85:4 Hudson Garden Village PUD Dear Mr. Mullen: Soil appears to have been covered in this report and the material submitted under Case Number S-242:84: 14. An overall drainage plan should be prepared before final approval of this proposal . It appears that most of the runoff will drain into the Beebe Seep canal . This part of the drainage plan should be approved also by the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company. An erosion and sediment control plan should be prepared before final approval is given to this proposal . This plan should include erosion from both wind and water. Sincerely, Robert Warner, PresiderSt Board of Supervisors. o W][ ) ,r., , Q 1985 _ Weld Co. Planning Commission CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT E `b;4- - r V C A U y V o T1 Q. u- 2 of o w gO p ti 1O o '� N M O O N ♦ ; ° 1En el iilit'L' t _ q 9 m U o ru cc FE s a o u 9, a Groh G301GCroZaoao LL OG yd w tr T d k. I .;q . i 1 . 4qq4 M 1 %1 i 4 e. C� z I -. $ Z_ m W >� v W14 ; ; _ z ,.. H o o z adi H w a 6�p y> W 00 p0 [� O U' O O p S�j OOOV 7jTH w 8 d a jp4 El o w U E D iioF m L' t ' 1 O 0 0S 0 4, w z z H to a _ e$ =$ . a12 w c� x a . �' 6 0 to w J d 6 cc O co 1Sn r 00 1 r{ 2 of „ oF rm TJ ��'tii, S* riltt W a� ? Y � � 1/40 0 at Q � 7' �. �.��j CI LL Lu'zr !- 4`20 O N Q O D+ Sys td ul W ?Q z mq VV Y fn 0 0w 0 a00 c 1111 " IJ 0 U tJ y�• oz• W 2 o z d o - 3 " ; d 0 z d O w •�' g a µ„ '? eC e. piar (.. Iflh1J 0 [1 Y J ' , 4 t nJ -¢ c4 z of W ,cp a a O 7 O LL �z 2 00 8 # g i F' U H H q ti m >z 41 o �EI E 0NI” a .. M U °w IH v $ � � g4 ..:)4 ga: . cc U Z H .-I 8 V� t t i d" k'We N Er LL O <o O vt 2 �� -7 Ot. z W z 2 N d i ...: i f 5`' V 1''J's'n 4 0861 'tied '006E WJOJ J N Q o .D N R1 rt 2 J O aa 1'1'1 >¢ W O w O o-4 U co ® Lai a 6 tz c�z - ccn o a c°m u'I ¢o 'U E 3> N 111222 aR •` > h v> od m M W >z N v c'- a a) LL 3m c'=". a O� act O ›, E o p .3 o N O z? a 3 CH.7 LL v -0 cm m m a^ p rl f �a Z U W m ≥ o ya n¢ o` a a Zo • rE�+ O T'' a QE Zit, - ` rri ° d a U oz c...) d a m •d `s 9 Er =c' J E W G Q z C `C) O a U m ¢ ¢9 ¢o a° 7. U a s-s-l * 386L 'Qed '00BE WJRd Sd J_ Q o s 2 of M >o¢ w w O W_ ¢� a a LL 6 ul F coo o o2 ¢ y cm ru CC _ (Ni 3= ITI W >z .tFj O E o) m U Oo w C co -N a u cr 1- 1 N LL O p - D U_ < M1 OLL z¢ W O a m co.-m tm m m rl ¢o I-7 6 U y '- ao ^ aM LL 0-I Zy m = 0 m a na 2 p Vl 1- Qi O LL N y C V a o s D. U Oz O W °i 0 " ¢E En Cl- W Z (".J '✓ N q U U C- J N U ." =c '- ¢ E O W o W rn ci Ci U co ¢ ¢9 ¢o of ao PtIlit 6 J 4$p }t • ( cd �j [ arr._i N t O .'DD3 A �A� WF ,C d,CO co W O Or g W �1 •' �� , .-7 LL z_ v Hod y Ro H ^12 • w i z LL a a zo LL 3 F m a-• ; evilr ' N 3 p G �\ U o z W li m w�'5plibj $ .14�jGt} L�. , 'r Q z cc 0a o a a a a: F LL t 3 • S 1 0 H a xi _ ` '° ii 5 iii aL x la G ► U in ii 11/ CS0 4. • 2 °E • dv" .a.• ` : . i_ URN RECEIPT PE Poem EMT,RIP/1 ?=e 1 u 2.g > S tt A O o O N 2_3 rl W p' R} CL aJ i-1 W rn ... ¢ Y 6 .7 Cr F Qo Tr) 6 O i �fp a .1i g E W Q, a. Lnli . w< 1-, F z o : i • W N - C^ W rya v „w ¢ •W w � e z rH E 3 1€ � . a h a) _ r.7 I--1 W t gs• > r W C 2 U t A C A • n' -,. .. • ii 1 r1/4101— a O i 4 g! ! h : u cf er 1K 4 • ❑ * { qq r.. r:ree s 1�! ' ! �..it IIN -a 1e F ; P . Rr R... J. j Y i F', _ I� a qT' °3 x F } N I z _ W 6 U N �D N O W _ 6 .7::‘ 0 O W U N S d'`-7q v W x U Q o H U J'. � F� e z =. `j • H a'. lb cy, G %du C o y y. = U W Gf S%in Do,t 4. �� •'t• f ::: 13 O z G � m 0 0 00 ��O W _H p m O _U. ru J H Din 2 m A o ^ q¢O w0 w� Q '' O U 0 f� w F ,.�i N _ , [>-Iwo aD UJ r' cn 0a O 0 U w 0 w » 0 0 N W 'A.7 .W-1 HI 2z ‘,...s W 0 w w ccn ...I w H o °' °' t • - aao ^ Qq0 a. O a 0 0 U U 0 /x W uJ CC 2 PI » w o It in LJJ 0o � CO V U p 1- A IZ 10 W ,.Wj l 0 3 w x U O w I 2 v � ' - 3P v a Q aIf o ickMI W Q w N 1 } 1 z o IQ � ;w \CI LT. w< O ti w �a oz Q W LL. �$ 1 CF-i � p ;�� . 0- Li.0 azJ-I L t ^ 11 HW' F ;C1 , z , mz F ELT F N Ora v m C7W1- =. : a a zo z H x a a m 8 6x a W o 2 O 3 .q-7 0 , i cC N o m Ili _C W vl W1 �{ r � W fn .0•S.n 4 g e , AN TS 5 r y w cc NZti I LL ≤jz v W' M n ; gO W W 11 0 + u7` F' a o W W .O 1i" '. 3 O 1V` R a ag i. m W >z a oz � S ww v CO a Ww €8 y M .% c..9 , o x S 1-�' . a co I '] a OC alsJIJfjJI $ aftt a w ?z F t W my W d WF' lO + R O O NI Rw'. o m * PS Pan*$11t:,1SSy 1988 Waif "' f •�' ^,,,,�., 1 I 1/4 ,� c t'zw1.4 + E f 104 tjt ‘I a >a w 1µ 9 w rn Si 1 ¼Th1! tt CC H a $ 30D' pz u N LL N �..I,. q c �i } ' .. .. N W a o ' a O O r 4 LL x N diw IWt1U 2 RJ 4PS ROOM urn Jew 1968 447rd16 { .�1 o III "• 4 a �c 44, �. ', t o r i o a s 1° { F a ? O;- LL z v H N 'S N is) F- a6 a N 1Eii $ 1 QQQ 1 nJ uY a d s ■■ 11g�II WO CC aza H,7to ui O2a wu D0 LL Er o z a 1-1 Z � 1 �^ & Y 0LL cc u �.0 Oco LL o i� W O B4fV r µ' nr a up 1— a a W oz HI m a a m t a° U it d assn , :fl q a= PS Parmat ta0V1ap 4474444 Le' ' r .A RECEIPT • T J CHJ 1 H , re w o H r( ra ULO ' r4 IA k H 6tEF F ao Z N 19 ' t 't'ij Rl U o FH 1/4O aO M +'w tt d ao Z NI rpjp 41 4 � o ¢ z u zH C rig i,¢ 1 H 00 Ct } a_ w,_ m IT, t 6' o F w zz Z 2 a E . .... cn 6 �- w Z x a U cn CI) a is I J , 1 ' k , . :'.. 0 ric o w 2 w s w 1II$t,_ . 4 0' al LT. LL.. c o ; v1 O IC \, ai. V'1 Q ¢� ≤ z n h r R r + fU W z r W tD ttl `l. W r t F4 P� m o w W W I ' # i 1 W W�j V' O z! M Z I £ Ji H tr1 Z 41 v } N so w v ' $ E o � x € r9 a �, • o W a m a 3O W 3 t W z z -, ,• PC W a m 7 -E N + h in w . I t '� r - a i s . 6 111 Z U S o Hr1M 3 2 U to I [ di .AW H6 Gas wL�s.n . . ' 'I w g cn 'k � .= .`' ^,, 'I t t fy. 1 Rp Fi' V J o N Y 1 T F .x j' I , .r>rz m O aIH �+ W I m z it O d Aa V'I H a o W O f i 1$¢ O r . N K Etc- m a U i i '� + e • ° � M Vl'U o ¢ < m a §4), i .4 O �I I d SE¢ a Q` cc Uz N H LL N ¢ c-3 " +a .! I CL z o W Zi U � � d H a t k r } Rd� d W z lii mx Pv�° v li W W a U vai `0.-'iCC 0 e z 3" !. o a ' �.. � t10ME8tle0E'R1 NE$EIF PS Fee . J 'R�'• i tk + 1 4 o p t Cac 1 A•• iq -v1 % �F Ci d� UN • d p « }�LL ." g ' ;a ,p ,H W COO i \ '• t ' `� i .• k] O k wz 6. W zo �+ W W :, 'S. W W 5 fix.: ,t'k", •.� pp + Q m H O H w z HW co a U N F4rnH � 1 .a , 4 `I /0si • S ; 1 0 w .� -' $ * ,- 4 T �@ , N : �. t y�-- 4 Li o LTI S O G `. y LL Q p 33 f y x ` V1 E CO t, p,. 4 �.g rr H � v d pp a o 1 to z • ?f Y M CL t7 . 1 tit W o� vFiviw. ir % w+ sF `° a � c Q go CtI a a° v zwo t3 f01 d ns'n . H . ca o {_ $. A 'ka p k ''i J a a o $ of w a S. i ki LL IL ¢ q 6 H F7vI W t ;L ' U 00 a� F T m o z it; IBEL L S _ q N Ia J H 1 r u. a¢ r7 O Z` ,T 7 i ..: i r7 ra tW w .} ' rrl a z z • cn 2 a) o Q I.w) '111J a Oa ,cal i d�sn * .o 0 N 6 LifWOO 4 S C a � x wxmx ri w • q. .pi �,�y 'Y b0M T1C itETt ,*RECE►P'' pS pwm ittl." 41V 4M9 M7.8A6 ₹3 t O F 49 I w U 2 a �y m IL v CC Uw ¢ z eo z S '1 z m Q' 0w G w 4' R q R U Q q LL G mow.. X Z¢ O. < O Z 6. 5 I O TT W w N ° Iit1I1Kfl hi ik� "+ v t .8 I-1 Pci O's'n + � e� ' ■ " ,, ,.. ; J b Yg Q o f t 3 �_,t� nw •.f.. o f cn 69 4 l t Cn IZ '�� O c� N a s O U N 4 # T _ v . ru W o Z R'Qi 2 CO O k66 t O w �n � �t 4 6. CC o w O4 O a i-] • �> n, cc c=4 w N OLL ¢'- . F O r l OU Z rj O Il._ liar x ;it J t 6it :½ Ud ! r "" �v iF �` I. ' ' t ;.d.�sn , 4t bey # r *40g,fit e • 61 I 64 F c O_I �� `• gK Q 4p i da AID O o� 6 64 et a i [,-,,44 w M O U? ,b rt a „ w 4 s ,- " z W 4 IL con a W zo N cl Lc, O m V r CI S r1OO , e . r A u er ;go0x al - : 1 aNz i 2 z x P r17¢ 4 { 1,+ it Sl 0 a cc O W a¢ C4 d!I11 Vl N £'� ,* 4st• NV] 7<p J al g' pco cc Z 4II . O tm r iftIff Ri U o a W O W Q, ¢ z m cc � U °� a : $_cc ., 0,00 a a ; •' rL a �� IWH ' F E a,-, o ( c 4 LL U oz ,-i • z m � , I � 0. YQ Rx�� W z z�a m O N B ' y£?.k ' .` .+u�" 'u ¢ Q NcNi U uai p 1 "l N x (.. ,• * i s�9E'a+ e.4, sa'u. { - _y.tw,E. e,...-;:it,4 #r `x° Nl9p. i it . a I SiS S n O £ O.i et. f R 1 C4 — " > N iw s rq CI o fl fiSSST W t + [ `vr y• 'fi el.rzi R `.:- z v F M M Y. E `' F M ‘,33' $ B i { Vol? mo W Q W ,--i CC �r 41,_, " ;£� 'Ns. to,..,3, LL Q¢ a U f ,� a f l r 'm t rq w zo fPFG� o LL "" i -. F o '. _ � I t w U 6 6 m r. ¢ z o m 8 P + rq, ,-� o a U ' t ,� U .J S•fI r �} r. i to ft:— d I �� S+ba`a^M' -.n 4G w r e+af,u ] ‘1."°!: "gt W,'xe °,44.' r6'.'i...„$'1/44.4 ' i 1- a k ♦ i * a ,. 5 a ` o a I kf q ao U A • w La o a� v i 4Stic-, o ru IT wz U F ¢p <4 N' ,fi ¢ ru W >Z y � dl J -&4 i N N 00 Ow ti aQ 3 O v x {r� ki a z o U m o ttl a J j 1:30.‘t;`" S`s`s O LL d W z N �/. v y iltt s. O+ i �g� > ° `� U O O �7 O ee _ m 'j.. N , ri x ' - xei.e cr X PI dVSflt Lyge. SrS,>t§ gat �t Pt '. ilU I , o ¢ Z t vo .' p66 �Ln H 3 w ...13 Y b I C D a�S4r.. _ \Li. • ° 9 -if >el U U it E ' U i! cos 1 `V L$ LL a r0 ..nj LL W a 6 O o • 0 5 U i U co w ' a d ao N 2 °- S W U N +e ,-.,_,r cr Ox La,I- cc x s; , � 6 a 6 A 1 a. rg Ha LL W U ¢$ 6 x C I E s 7 11t❑❑flJi41jii Pa x Si t : t ; F 2 '-• N T - , r/ 1#0#1011112 RM1 RECEIPT P8 Form 3811,JUIY 1983 447 .' I a 2 6 al s�ld' - 2 o- a w ? ¢ O W d a E as�oD°'- pLL. wz c WO CO is V7 R k ¢o m 3—' x�µe m t o¢ e P tv LL ;o o_o UW I-4 �i ) Z" Ld ;Oy p Cr z c W m W m N`m m o Cel N O Z Q W H 0.1 O i - o p u_ so a U m o -Sp nQ H F E F. a m m o m ie�L 0. cnr p ❑ m ¢E er-) c aPN a w zo e_) x U d a) o . o . - 11 V zz P' oO :° d '3 '=czii b- h U en d 2961 '9E J I \C 1I y.° `�t i ul w¢ - ^; `yamLi! a oAFgg z Yewaw `zmwELIco8 i a o f a7 cr cc �w � Hw5w NZZ: 1 g wawa it co n- FO ¢o ec 1/4- , U LL ~ i 1Z•1 ] .�7 W Ia ri 6 O WW ' U � aa w'8 Q 3c4W '� ti a o. E, • w 6-M m g ! iJjii . I. rk c4 -4 O - r z zwam E'a . m o , • lii '..o .� 16 v UB ' ., ' f .iWca 6 " O'gf`J"Snx ₹• 13kEc� ❑ W aWN q $ PS Form 3879.JWY 1983 447+846 c 1.76ME6TIC RETURN RECEIPT . O - ( \/\ y + / » }` y » : \ \ . 0- \ / \ , \\ 2 ~ ' 1 \ . '. / 2 `tf 7\ 01 : 7 ' , s \ $ ).-1 . \ ! ( mac a . ( _ § ~ � � \ ( ^ \ .4 p4 \ \ ) � c. \ }§ aa = 3Q « . Z /' .2 .- » \ 0 j ) � ) $ \ \\ LU m. \ - \ ) / ® j z Q wmo 77 \ \ [ ° � Q V 41 0 Hello