HomeMy WebLinkAbout850780.tiff- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVAL OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT
OPERATION (140 COWS) - JAMES E. AND MICHELE I. VETTING
WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public
hearing on the 18th day of December, 1985 , at the hour of 2 :00
p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the
application of James E. and Michele I. Vetting, 22670 Weld County
Road 54 , Greeley, Colorado 80631 , for a Use by Special Review for
a livestock confinement operation (140 cows) on the following
described real estate, to-wit:
Part of the NW', Section 23 , and part of the
SW4, Section 14 , Township 5 North, Range 65
West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
WHEREAS , Section 24 .4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request
of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County
Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented
in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this
request shall be approved for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the
application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance.
2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section
24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
a. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the
Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan encourages the development of agribusiness and
agriculturally oriented industry provided these
enterprises do not adversely affect the local
economy or environment.
,+ ;7-z%(-"1/9"
i 850760
�?LILC5
Page 2
RE: USR - VETTING
b. The proposed use is an agricultural activity and
is, therefore, consistent with the intent of the
agricultural district.
c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the
existing surrounding land uses and with future
development of the surrounding areas as permitted
by the Agricultural Zone District.
d. No overlay districts affect the site.
e. Use by Special Review Development Standards will
provide adequate protection of the health, safety
and welfare of the neighborhood and County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a
Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement operation (140
cows) on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby
is, granted subject to the following conditions:
1 . The attached Development Standards for the Use by
Special Review permit be adopted and placed on the Use
by Special Review plat prior to recording the plat.
2 . The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur nor
shall any building or electrical permits be issued on
the property until the Use by Special Review plat has
been delivered to the Department of Planning Services
Office and the plat is ready to be recorded in the
office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
3 . The Use by Special Review plat shall be amended to show
a total 75 foot right-of-way reservation from the
centerline south on U.S. Highway 34 .
Page 3
RE: USR - VETTING
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 18th day of
December, A.D. , 1985 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: 4atQ/:A WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County dark and Recorder c . \fr
and Clerk to the Board Jacqu ine o son, Chairman
/"1�-7 EXCUSED
BY: r1G,� Gene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem
Deputy -County rk
y
--6-6,11
APPROVED AS TO FORM: C.W. Ki by
42
dEXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE
Gordon E. Lac?
County Atto ney 1‘111G /, //44—r4
Frank Yamaguc
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
James E. and Michele I. Vetting
USR-704 :85 : 49
1 . The Use by Special Review permit is for a livestock
confinement operation as submitted in the application
materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and
subject to the Development Standards stated herein. The
maximum number of animal units permitted is 140 head.
2 . All waste retention facilities shall meet and be maintained
in accordance with the State Health Department' s Guidelines
for Design of Feedlot Runoff Containment Facilities. The
applicant shall be responsible for any additional
requirements issued by the Colorado Department of Health,
Water Quality Control Division.
3 . All construction done on the property shall be in accordance
with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code
Ordinance.
4 . The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the
Use by Special Review, Section 24 .5 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
5. The applicant shall comply with the Operation Standards for
Uses by Special Review, Section 24. 6 of the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance.
6 . Representatives or members of the Weld County Health
Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services
shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable
time in order to insure the operations carried out on the
property comply with the Development Standards stated herein
and all applicable Weld County Regulations.
7 . The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans
shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all
applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations
from the plans and/or Standards as shown or stated shall
require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the
Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or
Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in
the office of the Department of Planning Services.
8 . The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be
responsible for complying with all of the foregoing
Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Standards
may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of
County Commissioners.
HEARING CERTIFICATION
DOCKET NO. 85-92
RE: USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION -
JAMES E. AND MICHELE I. VETTING
A public hearing was conducted on December 18, 1985, at 2:00 P.M. , with
the following present:
Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Chairman
Commissioner Gene Brantner, Pro-Tem - Excused
Commissioner C.W. Kirby
Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy
Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff
Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison
Planning Department representative, Debbie de Besche
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated December 2, 1985, and
duly published December 5, 1985, in the Johnstown Breeze, a public
hearing was conducted to consider the request of James E. and Michele
I. Vetting for a Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement
operation. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter
of record. Debbie de Besche, Planning Department representative,
distributed copies of a letter from the applicants amending the
application to 140 cows, rather than 250 cows as originally requested
and an Individual Sewage Disposal System permit, labeled as Exhibits G
and H. Chuck Cunliffe, Director of Planning Services, noted that the
Planning staff recommended approval of this application, although the
Planning Commission recommended denial. He stated that the Planning
staff recommendation for approval contained conditions and proposed
Development Standards for this operation. Ms. de Besche read the
recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. James
Vetting, the applicant, and Henry De Jong, the potential purchaser of
the property, came forward to answer questions of the Board and clarify
the request to be for 140 animal units. Coming forward to speak in
favor of the request were Ross Powell, Charley Frank and George Maxey.
Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the request of James E. and Michele
I. Vetting for a Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement
operation with a maximum of 140 cows, basing his motion upon the
recommendation of the Planning staff and subject to the conditions and
Development Standards as proposed by the Planning staff. Commissioner
Kirby seconded the motion and reviewed the Use by Special Review
criteria. The motion carried unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 23rd day of December, 1985.
APPROVED:
;� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: 1/4rTY(1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County C1 rk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Boa acqua ne Jo n rn
on, Chairman
By: j29_j,� ill EXCUSED DATE OF HEARING
Deputy County C [Xtc Gene R. Brantner,_���Q�
C.W. KirbyPro-Tem
/
TAPE #85-107 EXCUSED
Gordo . Lacy
:::K::9:8592
Franc Yama
ATTENDANCE RECORD
TODAY ' S 1-EARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : DECEMBER 18, 1985
DOCKET 185-29L - TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, LEROY SATHER JR. DBA STREAMERS
DOCKET # 85-83 - SHOW CAUSE, VESSELS OIL & GAS COMPANY
DOCKET # 85-89 r USR, PROCESS & SELL FORESTRY PRODUCTS, DARREL OR TAMARA LOCKMAN
DOCKET # 85-90 - USR, GREYHOUND DOG KENNEL, GENE & DIANNE GURLEY
DOCKET #85-92 - USR, LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION, JAMES E. & MICHELE I. VETTING
PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DCC # (as listed
above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending.
NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING
y c. r I 7t.�r? t�f l s f* -di.. b s ._ 2c
c
fAt6jo'y /`� Sa4-W r' Jk. /9/5-9c 60/74c,cx cite �,c 81 c ZiL
1 T rot i 1( O/ ! PP .o3as4J - 4 = 4e tip .• z.c;
l� s
�2r!'?�jd I ) 7 2c& s/C/c s .kts - c1.2
-711----c- ituJr_i), :e7-/ / SY y �S !i` 11
Alfa ,y/ 41,1,41) 7z54- ./� , 1tr toAif/,. V5_h 0 7L&i:- 0-. tazi . (le:, dsic/0)
t_,( ' • B...(21th /)-; <
el
V \\I ..2,378 L.twi 3V C5v-ce /el Co s _ j`16 9'it fit) q3 tr'i/.o' ,„1/47/47 c,2,? 7U cci(,:7 ,jLl -. u/rte." ; - I
EXHIBIT INVENIORY CONTROL SHEET
Case ( SP- 7,jyr#
Exhibit
Submitted By��� Exhibit Description
�///�
�'"��A• T %Zer* .G? �{- < ///L eiI" -V 1Ce/ FZ!.%��TGL-0.000
B. YiLll%/724 e ./�52co71 /1-4,� oc 1/1,24.ennne,"..
C. )`,CO2il/JZ!/7, �777/I aaz r i7Iz0/JS, 0227
D. S,f%J //2rde 4 vv
1 'lei
E. Ant_ 'c//U..eled. G 00-6-de -4 i
F. S ' c‘,17-4a M 7 G. S os
H. /eVir.9 s /z�i
I. /
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
NOT I C E
Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board
of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time
specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Use by Special
Review are requested to attend and may be heard.
Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court
reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped
record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's
Office can be contacted for a list of court reporters in the area. If a
court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised
in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost
of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County
Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board
of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915
10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado.
APPLICANT
DOCKET NO. 85-92 James E. and Michele I. Vetting
22670 Weld County Road 54
Greeley, Colorado 80631
DATE: December 18, 1985
TIME: 2:00 P.M.
REQUEST: Use by Special Review - Livestock confinement operation (250 cows)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW}, Section 23, and part of the SWk,
Section 14, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy
DATED: December 2, 1985
PUBLISHED: December 5, 1985, in the Johnstown Breeze
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NOTICE THEJOHNSTOWNBREEZE
STATE OF COLORADO I
Pursuant to the zoning laws of I SS
the State of Zoning and the
Weld Countye ngning Ordinance, COUNTY 01 WELD
public hearing will be held in Briggs,the Chambers.pf the Board of 1, Clyde liri[,6s, du solemnly swear Ih:it I
County Commfereoners of Weld am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze,County, Colorado; Weld County
Centennial Center, 915 10th that the same is a weekly newspaper
Street, First Floor, Greeley, printed, in whole or in part, and published
Colorado, at the time specified.
All persons - in any- manner in the County of Weld, State of Colorado,
interested in the Use.by Special and has a general circulation therein', that
Review are requested to attend
and:may be heard. said newspaper has been published
Should the applicant or any continuously and uninterruptedly in said
interested,• party desire the County of Weld for a period of more than
presence o'f $ art reporter_to
make a 'tetei ot.'the• pro-- fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the
osedtayla.lotatftlhiontothet theta a.: first publication of the annexed legal nonce
record which willhe kept during
the hearing, the y11ark to the or advertisement; that said newspaper has
Board's offtclia 'be contacted
fora list of court reporters in the been admitted to the United States mails a;
area. •of a corm rePbrter-is second-class matter under the provisions of
ofobtained,the Clerk to the Board's the Act of March J, 11179, or an)
such actiofice shall on:atleas five in rdays
-prior to the heating. The coat of amendments thereof, and that sail
engaging a court.;reporter shall newspaper is a weekly newspaper daly
be borne by the requesting party.
qualified for publishing legal notices and
BE IT ALSO KNOWN 'that thete advertisements within the meaning of the
Weld Countd yyaPlano niiedbpCom° laws of the State of Colorado.
missiion County
ytbe examined in tithe
office of the Clerk to the Board of That the annexed legal notice or advert si:-
-
County Commiealoners, located
in the Weld County O meat was published in the regular and
pntennial
Center, 915 10th Street, Third entire issue of every number of said weekly'
Floor, Greeley, Colorado. newspaper for the period of / consec•u-
APPLICANT live insertions; and that the first
-James E. and Michele
I. Vetting publication of said notice was in the iss.uiulL
22670 Weld County said newspaper d;itedyi/,f :\ I) 83-
Road 54 and that the last publication ul said notice
Greeley, Colorado
80631 was in the issue of said newspaper dated
DOCKET NO. 85-92 A.D. 15
DATE: December 18, 1985 In witness whereof I have hi•1y'eulito set
TIME: 2:00 PM. • my hand-this /v day of /Jae_-
A.D. 19'3
REQUEST: Use' by Special
Review v Livestock
confinement
operation n (250 e cows)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part ofj f'Uhluhct the NWY.,Section and part of CC,the SWI ,Section 14,Township 5
North, Range 65 West of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado
BOARD OF COUNTY Subscribed and sworn to before Inc, a
COMMISSIONERS Notary Public in and fur the County of
WELD COUNTY,
COLORADO We , Stale of Colorado, this ./9. . day of
BY: MARY ANN .A..LG. A_1). MAC.
FEUERSTEIN
COUNTY /J�
CLERK AND gaG'J_2 �
z-P
RECORDER AND.CLERK ¢Q
TO THE BOARD
By: Mary Rein, Deputy
NUt:;I'y I'til,l is
DATED: December 2, 1985
PUBLISHED: December 5, 1985
in the Johnstown Breeze My commission expires .... P}t7-.
. My Commlkc'^n Expires J .ane 1'; 1,,
2 South Perish Avenue
,r ;r• 7;: 61:3.34
•
-C .'r J.. .. - . . ..•a••
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF COLORADO
ss.
County of Weld,
I, _ Millette S. Clarkson of
said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am
an advertising clerk of
THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and
THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN
that the same is a daily newspaper of general
circulation and printed and published in the City of
Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or
4 q u'`i advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has
.
'a s.. ti r , , Fir .yy
'N, „, been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive
r,�+a i _l1° `. (days) (skiglX that the notice was published in the
rnt a Re tn.ci,a regular and entire issue of every number of said
.+ 1i -;,;:r*- f'P°y,es newspaper during the period and time of publication of
�+ � said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a
xr n a µi t� � l.are9rrM h. supplement thereof; that the first publication of said
,mewe ioa notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper
a ....0. ws,«.�
'4 „ i • uAYh
bearing date
$ r '' R► c
� r R.
f,t°, 7.<a4 , )',My. "I Fourth
' day of Dece rber A.D. 19 85
;4/0.4. .214.41T7 ' 4."6 and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said
»«, m.... aWelteapr1a newspaper date the
,,,y, '�'"�, ,� w, �6,� �.�sw.not�,anbearing
•• Mb Opp istzNry rrissiaii 's•
MM'i�tt4MM11�i'v COLORA o_ Fourth
04. }, 1 f day of _ Dtc:ember A.D. 1985
•
that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley
° ,� , , Republican, has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly during the period of at least six
months next prior to the first issue thereof contained
said notice or advertisement above referred to; that said
newspaper has been admitted to the United States
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the
Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and
that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified
for publishing legal notices and advertisements within
the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado.
December 4,1985
Total Charge: $26.24
/./�,7",.e"-. cc, u zgi,c,a,-4,-)
Advertising Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
4 day of _ pare-riper A.D. 19 85
c4y mission }
( Y m ion r
Not yy ublic
OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PHONE(303)356-4000,EX T. 4200
P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY COLORADO 80682
WI I C.
COLORADO
N0V 2a1985
November 13, 1985
James E. and Michele I. Vetting
22670 Weld County Road 54
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Dear James and Michele Vetting:
Your application for a Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement
operation (250 cows) has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County
Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the
property involved is shown as part of the NW}, Section 23, and part of the
SW}, Section 14, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado.
If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be
necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this
letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will
then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal
newspaper, an expense to be paid by you.
In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by
December 2, 1985. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date,
the matter will be considered closed.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO C:6p cea c(.C1O.N..,
AIRMAN
I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County
Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense.
/
Gi�` L/
,[. XHLei7 s[
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Paulette Weaver that the following resolutionfle -introit:tided-115r
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it solved by the WeldT
County Planning Commission that the application for: D '.
N0V 81985
CASE NUMBER: USR-704:85:49 I
iU
'IS ---- tom
NAME: James E. and Michele I. Vetting PfiC.C.Lw. COLO.
ADDRESS: 22670 Weld County Road 54, Greeley, Colorado 80631
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement
operation (250 cows)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWT, Section 23, and part of the SW14,
Section 14, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles east of Greeley; east of Weld County Road
45 and south of U.S. Highway 34
be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the
following reasons:
Because given the particular configuration of this land, much of it being in
wet bottom—land, is not suitable for corral space, wastewater retention, hay
storage or food storage of any sort. That this request is for far too many
animals on the usable portion of land which is considerably smaller than
eleven acres.
Motion seconded by Lynn Brown.
Vote:
For Passage Against Passage
Don Johnson Louis Rademacher
Lynn Brown Doug Graff
Lydia Dunbar Jack Holman
Ann Garrison
Paulette Weaver
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
Ex/rineT
USR-704:85:49
James E. and Michele I. Vetting
November 5, 1985
Page 2
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on November 5, 1985, and recorded in Book No. X of the proceedings of the
said Planning Commission.
Dated the 5th day of November, 1985.
�041. �sa O\moa
Bobbie Good
Secretary
c. _\e, \--,3 boa
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 5, 1985
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on
November 5, 1985, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County
Centennial Building, 915, Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was
called to order by the chairman, Jack Holman at 1:35 p.m.
Tape 223 — Side 1
ROLL CALL
Lydia Dunbar Present
Doug Graff Present
Don Johnson Present
Bill McMurray Absent — Called in
Louis Rademacher Present
Ann Garrison Present
Lynn Brown Present
Paulette Weaver Present
Jack Holman Present
Also present: Rod Allison, Current Planner II, Debbie deBesche, Current
Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie
Good, Secretary.
A quorum was present.
The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning
/
Commission held on October 15, 1985, was approved as distributed.
CASE NUMBER: USR-704:85:49
APPLICANT: James E. and Michele I. Vetting
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement
operation (250 cow dairy)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW4, Section 23 and part of the SW4, Section
14, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles east of Evans; east of Weld County Road
45 and south of U.S. Highway 34
APPEARANCE:
James Vetting, property owner and applicant, reported they have recently
subdivided this land into 11 acres and 62 acres. They plan to sell the
eleven acre parcel which they have been renting to a dairy farmer who sells
Grade A milk, but since they obtained a recorded exemption they now need to
obtain a Use by Special Review permit for the dairy because there are now
too may head of cows on the property to comply with the Zoning Ordinance.
They are asking for a permit to allow 250 head of cattle which would include
milk stock, dry lot and calves. Mr. Vetting stated he had asked the person
who owns the dairy and is purchasing the land on a rent-purchase agreement
to be present today, but apparently he was unable to attend.
/r'
,Exrfiee r C
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
November 5, 1985
Page 2
The Chairman asked Debbie deBesche to read the recommendations, conditions,
and Development Standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services
staff into the record.
The Chairman asked Mr. Vetting if he had any problems with any of the
recommendation, conditions, or Development Standards as outlined. He stated
he had none.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
MOTION:
Paulette Weaver moved Case Nubmer USR-704:85:49 for James E. and Michele I.
Vetting for a Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement
operation for a two hundred and fifty cow dairy be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for
denial because given the particular configuration of this land, much of it
being in wet bottom—land, is not suitable for corral space, wastewater
retention, hay storage or food storage of any sort. That this request is
for far too many animals on the usable portion of land which is considerably
smaller than eleven acres. Motion seconded by Lynn Brown.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed concerning whether or not to amend the
number of cows allowed on the property.
Lee Morrison clarified the discussion by pointing out that the Planning
Commission cannot amend what the applicant has asked for. If the applicant
feels this amount is too many, and he asks to have the number lowered he may
do so. If the applicant does not wish to lower the number and the Planning
Commission feels the number is excessive they may vote against the request.
Mr. Vetting was asked if he would be willing to lower the number of cows in
his request. He stated he would not be willing to do this unless he could
consult the dairy farmer who is buying the property, and he wishes to go
ahead with the application as presented.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Louis Rademacher - no; Don Johnson - yes;
Lynn Brown - yes; Doug Graff - no; Lydia Dunbar - yes; Ann Garrison - yes;
Paulette Weaver - yes; Jack Holman - No, because numbers do not have as much
to do with anything as the management of the numbers in this type of area.
Even though the cattle will be confined to the eleven acres, and there is a
lot of land that is not usable for the things that need to be for this high
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
November 5, 1985
Page 3
a number, the management is the important thing that will make this feasible
and more compatible with the area. Motion carried with five voting for the
notion and three voting against the motion.
CASE NUMBER: USR-705:85:50
APPLICANT: Daniel and Joyce Tietmeyer
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service
establishment (contract trucking business) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NEIL, Section 15, T6N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles north of Gill; south of Weld County Road 70
and west of Weld County Road 57 -
APPEARANCE:
Daniel Tietmeyer, property owner and applicant, reported they live on this
property and they own a trucking business which is agriculturally centered.
They would like to operate the trucking business from this location. They
do maintenance and small repairs at this site, but no major repairs.
Tape 123 — Side 2
The main use of the building is for the storage of their tractors. They
haul meat for Monfort and therefore, there are seldom trailers on the
property. They would like to expand their business. and it would make it
much easier to operate from this location.
The Chairman asked Mr. Tietmeyer if he had reviewed the recommendations,
conditions, and Development Standards as outlined by he Department of
Planning Services staff. He stated he had and already owns more equipment
than allowed for in the Use by Special Review application.
Lee Morrison reported Mr. Tietmeyer could not ask for a greater amount than
the permit called for. He would either have to go ahead with this request
and then ask for an amendment, or the request could be continued until the
staff has had adequate time to readvertise and renotify the surrounding
property owners after conferring with him and seeing what would
realistically satisfy his needs.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who was present to
hear today's case and would not be able to attend a later meeting for this
request. There was no one.
INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION
Case Number use 70 9- 11 ,/;? Submitted or Prepared
Prior
to Hearing At Hearing
1. Application /6 Pages
2. 6 Application plat(s) / page(s)
3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet /
4. DPS Recommendation V
5. DPS Surrounding Propery Owner Mailing List
6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List
7. S DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician
8. DPS Notice of Hearing ✓
9. DPS Case Summary Sheet ✓
10. DPS Field Check ✓
11. p�2 t et/tj /0-941 k �7� �',
12.14 gala AAA/ /O-14 fro+, Ji `^" _ 4. ✓
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
I hereby certify that the /items identified herein were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission
hearing. I further certify that these items were ,ff rwarded to the Clerk to the
Board's office on 77p(/. d 19 13.
i
Current P anner
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF WELD )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS fit DAY OF A ^Pir7e- -Pic- 19 J≤ ,
SEAL
My Commission Expires Jana 13, 130 L7/-"915 10th Street
Greeley.Colorado 80331
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION/EXPIRES__
�XHiBiT A
Date: November 5, 1985
CASE NUMBER: USR-704:85:49
NAME: James E. and Michele I. Vetting
ADDRESS: 22670 Weld County Road 54, Greeley, Colorado 80631
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement
operation (250 cows)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW1 , Section 23, and part of the SW1,
Section 14, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles east of Greeley; east of Weld County Road
45 and south of U.S. Highway 34
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application
requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2: It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
- The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages the development of agribusiness and
agriculturally oriented industry provided these
enterprises do not adversely affect the local economy or
environment;
- The proposed use is an agricultural activity and is,
therefore, consistent with the intent of the
agricultural district;
- The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing
surrounding land uses and with future development of the
surrounding areas as permitted by the agricultural zone
district;
- No overlay districts affect the site; and
- Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide
adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of
the neighborhood and County.
ISR-704:85:49
James E. and Michele I. Vetting
Page 2
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is
conditional upon the following:
1. The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special Review
permit be adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat
prior to recording the plat.
2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any
building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the
Use by Special Review plat has been delivered to the Department of
Planning Services' office and the plat is ready to be recorded in
the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
3. The Use by Special Review plat shall be amended to show a total 75
foot right-of-way reservation from the centerline south on U.S.
Highway 34.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
James E. and Michele I. Vetting
USR-704:85:49
1. The Use by Special Review permit is for a livestock confinement
operation as submitted in the application materials on file in the
Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development
Standards stated hereon. The maximum number of animal units permitted
is 250 head.
2. All waste retention facilities shall meet and be maintained in
accordance with the State Health Department's Guidelines for Design of
Feedlot Runoff Containment Facilities. The applicant shall be
responsible for any additional requirements issued by the Colorado
Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division.
3. All Construction done on the property shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
4. The applicant shall comply with the design standards for the Use by
Special Review, Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
5. The applicant shall comply with the Operation Standards for Uses by
Special Review, Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
6. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department and
Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access
onto the property at any reasonable time in order to insure the
operations carried out on the property comply with the Development
Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations.
7. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown
hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld
County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or
Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment
of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of
County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or
Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the
office of the Department of Planning Services.
8. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be
responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Standards.
Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Standards may be reason for
revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
USR-705:85:49
JAMES E. AND MICHELE VETTING
The Greeley Planning Commission, in a letter dated October 9, 1985,
recommended denial of this request due to the intensity of animals on the
parcel and possible environmental influences that may extend beyound the
property boundaries.
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: October 29, 1985
CASE NUMBER: USR-704:85:49
NAME: James E. & Michele I. Vetting
ADDRESS 22670 Weld County Road 54, Greeley, CO 80631
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation
(250 cow dairy) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NW} of Section 23, and Pt. SW} of Section 14, T5N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 2} miles east of Evans, east of Weld County Road 45
and south of U.S. Highway 34.
SIZE OF PARCEL: 11 acres
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this request is listed in Section 24.3 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
The dairy already exists as described in the application materials. The
71-acre farm was recently split (September 5, 1985) into two lots of 60
acres and 11 acres. As the 250 cow dairy operation is now located on the 11
acre parcel, which exceeds the number of animal units allowed by the County,
a Use by Special Review permit is required.
Concerns have been expressed by the Greeley Planning Commission and the
County Health Department (see attached letter and memorandum) .
The Department of Planning Services has received no objections from
surrounding property owners to this proposal.
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: USR-704:85:49 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 17, 1985
NAME: James F. and Michelle I. Vetting
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for a dairy (250) cows
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWti, Section 23, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2.25 miles east of Evans; east of Weld County Road
45 and south of U. S. Highway 34
LAND USE: N Highway 34 right-of-way
E Cropland, 5 residences
S Cropland, Lower Latham Ditch, one residence
W Farmland, residence
ZONING: N Agricultural
E Agricultural
S Agricultural
W Agricultural
COMMENTS:
Access is to U.S. Highway 34. Structures exist as illustrated on the Use by
Special Review plat. The existing dairy operation appears to be well-suited
to the surrounding area.
There are seven residences located within one-fourth mile from the dairy.
V- (
A
By: /y Ol-c L� i
-. ` -
Gloria V7 Dunn
Current.Planner
b ! x (+ HOWARD^ 2 ! Ate.
y
1 ft•--, alo eLeel• •o ell• o� ��G. (• •' •
�I
°^ // 2,..'___iA e i. • f1. • : C
• 8 ‘
18 • E8 6 „ if II le pup�R dM rye�13 A
EIAANE ILL
iin 22 \� `o 1e• F. lssz �I\ \ (�z'� zi ..! •qc 5 F 'n rir—O 40.1 J _
�f .'� ILOCERY ' 2 5.a • • W ( Y • • • ` •�� F" nh'tv' V i
ron rsna • hti '�
N. y ��I • °• I. P° /' • zF{ yf� p�+ 1 20 I` y 2 ° �9 10 J/7 x
I+ z, c/_., \\ €Ujm04Z)
— N,OmA_C Ov[ •n • a °w im E! t� !U i! i•
° ...� r'I` � . ° • °g"• ...Mo�f � \$ 16 )F
i� '� `p5 } �-_�`\ : if 'C°• ••1.-N4i tq C - •
�. (To,
] t vl� , t .4. in,ii a' ;2, A^.f .. .`° t !
r
,
v
----i-:
10 A ��I •
/ V s • p[ L' , • ••. . J zir ! •
. 1a • • •I xease. Ir''er •} 8
17 _ 1 -zz r\ e • • . . - .r_ 2,7•
G°_ • 'S y • e v
# I fv N5 j /' -�� r• � . •• • -.Its
I . • . ) • • - - A
y m ''✓J�lv 1 '�' K x t• ]O • 12! x• i LOMOT i • .•.r..;
t / Q • ` .• •
-.C•••••”•••,...
N ice.- C•�f 3 P. , \ • s• l !� ‘—'•-11; nI• !• .i ss 01``!/,A• `• J u 4_
'.L _ E2' • IiI!. mw.4r+ I Nort fI • •• ,ill O. ''_ • f' • Flrsle rp l/ ��•• ,o.:i. 1•,,,• /•t.'i'�0� ° • eJ"aye—a/s . F�U' n 'ypJh•ier:oa , J4 <fl
12••'
x•. ••04 1��• • ° J • rr ll 10 4 . •• .c. • 0• ' • n •s.•lt, an n y /
n xo ii ii t)• i• • 2 Ln
• n j 'ij a i 5� •x+ yy a Y n n x. x• C Z, • x• 2• 10 $ as
•
�• v �I� !x ••s�• IP:I' �G�S! w I v u • • •
v • s. x ai x v
•d' [N__,
I
. T I 1 {•r
•l •
•
50' •• M' .
y''
.x •it T
; \ r . ,••M •
1I a I • • I' , / • n i• n n la
y
y xo x. F F I • S • m/ i v n 2, 24 n 20 N
- i
I
II
1 4 ' I v a s . - - a - - — .- -
�.� I.:
1i1111 .••., • ' I
:
..e../4 .49 0 • __...- _. - --
D
'-
1
I e° I
/
ill `,. ' , -p �S';.� kk I. � • r -ya• p° r :
�q J{:':in. '+.,:s^.a .I I ,.uf 1.
N c O siTh
_ e0
0 I. 1 1 o ` I --_ { C °_ .1yp(5. 4601•1'1 ® ds4652 _ 16• \ - 6 �: -rve P1 r5 ----_ —� -- 14
\ -- _— r ��
yJ _
`, 'r-�� Y - ,-_ -
I
1
_....
i ... _
.• , ...,. j:11 LI_ _ 46,
Vt Gk t
n°I
I ill'4_ 1 v 4522 1-6 ao,ca1/J CT,V i
. . - .._
/ - �� 4E29 -
/ 0 vu
0
p
. 4630 22 -
464/ ((�y
X465/6��3 1 �,y/
I ,a I 411.I c
�U
0
L:-..•
•I
Jo650J / r� ] v 7 , I
�r
'I
L7 I 1. U
!4642 '. t63] .9' •- - -. •. _- _ - - ..r5 545
-Auburn 4ch•e
/ n 28.29 ^2726
I ao I N
Fin
• l \`e a I 4_46
BM 46511 u6 •� o I
8 I 27 I_5.; 26
O / A na�
by r - X4662 4655x•..' r
p I
1 Di
I
1 °� ' •I" auburn
C> '-1"6=� hI
II y /rI n6`1— /
•a HAM , 4049
L
i III. - 4662 / -
0
''---- 4650---Y
I p6g0. Pap m •
1
i ^
c--
N
1 J^° I e fDam 35
BM- ,
_- __ 33 I 34
i
I �_- 4667 -
_ La-t 1,a Salle v i"
I
' s it9 4#k^Cy \ rr .y F
i
r:
6 mil' r " "k * ' `�
f�"s"
OP
f� . .�� ' ie ¢�' x IV.
yt r • •„ft, i,tycobratrif 4�'•'0 '.r .'p ;ete A_,s
• in. j',,- f- ;. JS C ';,17'''. . 1 ""6 ..f
# n}� A Q rte. .;V:
:C• ^: I • '#
dl'r► r P '..$)4441.-'41r " of
N
Roca
�• �, Nom . `
^?13"y Pr 4# ;Ake e
a
_ea..' , ' 07 "S w..e: a 'j
;'' ''� ,a ? ` j �JI�J ✓, l4:RF to- S �F t ' :5. r $Herr
\ f { - .Ti �t, /7 N' �n!h \- 'gYd f' �y y :z` `t'�:
r h l Y y a . \ �°,X,^ry " Pf+bti.• F„ FES •-.4: . e
:irk ..,..^:%9.4., .
1 �� r • ✓y a>zrri ' ' e{„et2:'c , i,r .mss .�I '
+ 1 'a r -. .. ' ...rvr...e+s o-,..m...a..w,r�.,,u;..br U - t
I
k,.G tar ff� F y s t 1
ilit0 may. ,gd 'OP- '"a—'1--
'x p 4, ):' :i.
O
.r� Y Yyt ,i'
ilz
LT
L.
v,.
' ,y d k 0.,
'1.4;�j`� i ° ' e� ', #' fs , t# ' 1`%� 1"30,1„. "'I ¢ '9.!* r -fie' 9`t,. .ti Yf\ a *f
,wit d�fr� ,, .., f w l F. 'b tys,, 'si " es�{Kjs'-- arm, , 3;, c r_ t : ..6F o r.•3 4 f ay) -'•,--,air jr• t
'Oat-- M1 x _7"' yi a-0 rrr tM a ,r ° < Xt ._ .,,� :;¢.£ �a t 3 .� t ,1'5• i K it.,*
"f` ,,..7 ' i` +.+yyam � ft•�y h�.4!Y ;a •t. .,.,,,,.ft r-,4,,,,: :., ..„,:t4, £5 ,
x4+, 3'.l4` ? ; Y !`Tf , 'D' 3' a'g r ✓':?� 2 „":r ,i `"i '' Y• \'.44 aS
lw >ra ,} 1rM� 'Y /� e sti lyia,,:f'4p.,
y., ,"M vE _.? h eke+. i '�'� l ,i_1
1# f.�:Y Y�' ��7 c-..41.
I
4 . 4"s Ir mx.ezt. .iR94. ....g���,3 /r � `�
+ry 3 3 fit . S v i x t11 �' � �,4'71.'4 t�t
�C'r' 4Wy'` ' I ,�+. +v t ;M1 :{:4t-.1::,,A.
t '3 r+�Y ''; S �S 3 1ig �" t
.74,f,',;;; ) F 3`^,.-µ��Si`sy�_�'1*2C ,�r�' nR '4,1.(,�%'J"i' anti: r .0*, .�. '"let 4d'r y��1:::t s
../2:
�2: .) yj ({ i aw"_ bi rAol.�.M1 r. „ A.ktN' i' l.uf +s,,,.. ;;;.,,#Y' 'f. :4.-._
Y T`li:+ite •.� L� M ''Y. /!t'X 3{. .... K� rY^`
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: James E. & Michele I. Vetting CASE NUMBER: USR-704:85:49
SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 25, 1985
NO SR NR
NO SR NR
County Attorney �/ X LaSalle Fire
/� Protection District
c/o Gary Sandau
X Weld County Health Dept. P.O. Box 414
_ Engineering Department
LaSalle, CO 80645
X City of Evans
X County Extension Agent c/o Galen Kane
P.O. Box 59
Office of Emergency Mngmt Evans, CO 80620
State Engineer
Division of Water Resources
1313 Sherman St. , Room 818
Denver, CO 80203
X X State Highway Department
1420 2nd Street (Verbal)
Greeley, CO 80631
Colorado Department of Health
Water Quality Control Division
4210 East 11th Avenue
Denver, CO 80220
X X City of Greeley Planning Department
c/o Steve Hill
919 7th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Tri Area Planning Commission
P.O. Box 363
Frederick, CO 80530
X Paulette Weaver
Weld County Planning Commission
1725 12th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
X Greeley Soil Conservation Service
/� 4302 9th Street Road
Greeley, CO 80634
NO=No Objection
SR=Specific Recommendations
NR=No Response
&A MEfnORAf1DUM
wilkTo Weld County Planning Date nrtnher 18, 1985
COLORADO From Allen F, Palmquist, Supervisor, Health Frotertion_.Servieey
Subject: Case # U.S.R. 704:85:49
There is no leach line from the barn. This is a drain line
which drains into a livestock run off lagoon. This is
permissible.
The grey water line from the house also drains into the
livestock confinment lagoon. Mr. Vetting was informed on
10-15-85 that he will need to take out a septic system repair
permit to repair the gray water line so that it is in compliance
with the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations.
To date a repair permit has not been taken out.
'`tccT2ii9a5JJ
�j G 5�is t\t1/�
�
'Held Co. PIammna tli m8ssial'
•
Kity of
GREELEY CIVIC CENTER, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303)353-6123
Creeleil
October 9 , 1985
Gloria Dunn
Weld County Dept . of Planning Services
815 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Gloria ,
On October 8 , 1985 , the City of Greeley Planning Commission reviewed the
request for James and Michele Vetting (U. S.R. - 704: 85 : 49 ) to permit a
250 cow diary on 11 acres . After completing their review, the City
Planning Commission recommends denial of this Use by Special Review due
to the intensity of animals and the possible environmental influences
(odor) that extend beyond the property boundaries . This position is
supportive of the recommendation made by the City on August 13 , 1985 ,
relative to the recorded exemption request to divide off an 11 acre parcel
of an existing 70 . 88 acre tract . As you may recall the City ' s
recommendation on the recorded exemption was , "no objection subject to
assurance that the total number of animal units permitted on the entire
70. 88 acre parcel does not exceed use-by-right levels permitted under the
County Agricultural Zoning District ." If this prior request is
accomodated , then the City has no objection to shifting or transferring
the location of the animals permitted at use-by-right levels if adequate
controls can be created to maintain these animal densities in the future .
If you have any questions in regard to this matter , please contact me. I
would also appreciate an update on how the County finally responds to
this petition .
Sincerely,
Stephen Hill
City Planner
t '±1985
Weld Co. Melinioq commission
( l
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.4400
"II4#1r
915 10th STREET
pV GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
114,
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on
November 5, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Use by
Special Review permit for a 250-cow dairy from James E. & Michele I. Vetting
on a parcel of land described as Pt. NWT of Section 23 and Pt. SWy of
Section 14, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 11
acres, more or less.
The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the
consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld
County Commissioners' Fearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related
to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley,
Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing
on November 5, 1985.
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the
Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center,
915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400.
Jack Holman, Chairman
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Johnstown Breeze
To be published one (1) tire by October 3, 1985
Received by
Date: ad
MAILING LIST
Vetting
USR-704
Surrounding Property Owners
0. Roger & Connie K. Burgess
2002 6th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
David . & Sharon K. Huffman
2515 29th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Ross G. & Donna J. Powell
26712 Weld County Road 45
Greeley, CO 80631
Victor F. Hillmann
27200 Weld County Road 45
Greeley, CO 80631
MAILING LIST
Vetting
USR-704
Mineral Owners
Pauline Ross
Rt. 1, Box 124-F
Oolagah, OK 74053
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: USR-704:85:44 DATE OF INSPECTION:
NAME: James E. & Michele I. Vetting
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a dairy (250 cows)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NWZ of Section 23,& Pt. SW4 of Section 14, T5N, R65W
LAND USE: N /1,,(, LL.C
,i/iA
E AA'11/1/14_. ciqfill X,i 4 T---1/4/V A'LIAL-bk
S th.vyk-,
w t4/2 T u ;44./ _/e.1,(ACtiv _.4
),
ZONING: N
LOCATION: approximately 24 miles east E
of Evans, east of Weld County Road 45 S
and south of Colorado Highway 34. W
COMMENTS:
Viva __.- dis-c.6.-- . ,,,, .4,1*---ep 4 m * kJ/I/IA-elk CAI/MA.Q
t /7# 4-Otz/ Lea1-4--t- -724 , (7.,-e?-i,-, .a . , --- 7 lefytiv 4,---
, .
)
s� / 1 A
! / /dj L' t / I / .Ir .6f' _ , t � i ,(1 / / i. /I . ds
r
- ,,• 5. „ p
Al i ' .
,f - / , U ir-
ir / Jd - - l' 1
APPLICATION
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
Department of Planning Services,
et, Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone - 915 5 Te Ext.nthStreet,Greeley,Colorado 80631
Date Received ----
Case Number _ Mylar plat submitted
Application Checked bye` �-- Receipt Number
Application Fee --—�— Receipt Number
Recording Fee
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature)
g m ssion I (we), the undersigned, hereby TegUehearings
the
the eproposed County
SpecialnReviewiPermitaof
the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning
the following described unincorporated area of Weld County Colorado:
SEE DESCRIPTION
ON ATTACHED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA:TN,N, R W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is
T N, R W
proposed:___ Section,__ r_
Property Address (if available)_ 22378 Highway CO 80631
PRESENT ZONE
agriculture OVERLAY ZONES
TOTAL ACREAGE l l
PROPOSED LAND USE C1 a iI'
EXISTING LAND USE c131Y'
SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW:
Name: James E. and Michele I .
Zip
I,d- y
Address: 22h7 O We l Co ' CitBusiness Telephone �k
—r 0
Home Telephone � --
Name: - C1ty��. Zip
Address: ---- Business Telephone
Home Telephone dk
Name: -- - City _ Zip
Add ress:�-__ Business Telephone
Home Telephone iP .__
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above):
Name: City Zip
Address: - Business Telephone #
Home Telephone 4k ----
List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record.
Address:_�Z� BOX 1•��`�L__ City DO
Name: Zip
city
Name: CiCy Zip
Address: -
de his and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/Or
I hereby pose application are true and correct to the best of my
plans submitted with or contained within this app
knowledge.
•
COUNTY OF WELD )
STATE OF COLORADO )
nature: Owner o orized Agent
l9
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires _�
Z I
•
• i '
•
•
i -
oli is described as follows:
t. The land referred to in this N �+
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (C1 /2 SW1/4
SW East Half of the Southwest W1 /4) and the Southeast Quarter
uarter of the Southwest Quarter (Sf:1 /4 son /4) of
Northwest Quarter
Section and the andttheHalf
Norf rtheast Northwest
ofQuarter
NorthwestllQuarter (NLl /4
(E1 /2 NW1 /4 of cion), Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. ,
P1W1/4) of Section 23, all in Township 5 North, 9 -
County of Weld, State of Colorado, EXCEPT parcels conveyed by instruments
recorded September 18, 1901 in Book 187 at page 279, April 17, 1907 in Book 250
28,
at page 102, April 29, 1969 in Book 609 under Reception No. 5 1530689, April
l
1971 in Book 645 under Reception No. 1566580, February 7, .9 in 9 661 under
15, 1972 in ook 2 n July 7, in5Book4742eunderyReception No.B1664418,uandrJlulye7,i1975 in Book
y Records.
742 under Reception No. 1664421 , Weld County
Application for Use by Special Review U0.0ff
James E. and Michele I. Vetting /OGr
Ato
2.
- Dairy farm.
/��/N We divided the property into two parcels, so needed to
i1'_ S, comply with regulations requiring a Use by Special Review
r Permit in order to continue the dairy operation.
- Farm ground and pasture .
- The dairy facility has one residence, and other
residences are located approximately y£ mile to the
east and west of the dairy.
- Not applicable .
- 1-2 employees, 2-3 milking shifts per day, varied hours.
- Central Weld.
- Highway 34.
- Milk truck every other day.
- House : septic tank and leach line .
Dairy : leach line .
- Not applicable .
- 250 cows, calves and dry cows.
(See plot - Waste is normally spread on-the fields in the spring and fall
plan) as it is removed from the corral . Stockpiling is occasionally
- Large berm located in pasture area on the east side of necessary.
drainage ditch.
- Not applicable .
- Not applicable .
- Not applicable .
- Not applicable .
3 .
- This proposal is consistent with the policies of the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan. The smaller parcel of 11 acres
more or less is now and has been for several years used
as a dairy farm and the remainder or larger parcel of the
land as a farm.
- The proposal is consistent with the intent of the zone
district in which the subject property is located as there
will be no change in use from what is and has been permitted
and such use is compatible with existing surrounding land uses.
Vetting
Page 2
- No agricultural land is being taken out of production.
- There is adequate provision for the protection of the
health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the
neighborhood and the county.
- The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing
surrounding land uses, as the property immediately adjacent
is either farm ground or pasture .
- The proposal will be consistent with efficient orderly
development .
- The subject property is not located in flood plain,
geologic hazard and/or Weld County Airport overlay district.
- flee attached.
- See attached.
- Not applicable .
- Not applicable.
NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET
Please print or type
NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION #
n 2002 (c)+45f,`o O 72ortm4 nnee �+. Put ess Gne1 Co 80431 6207G123000073
2.515" z901.4ue
Dovic) L. i_Shama IC.. 4b([men Greeley ea $or.3/ b Zo96123o0oo7`f
24.712. wee 4S
"Ross ur.. 1, Oann Y Powell Qeeeley Co BSS/ b2o961z3Cno 012-
7� eo �e y5"
Vac for i- gammonG?'raeley lb bb63/ 6zcR6ilgo:ool
I
•
:.r114+ ' " i 1 1,'1 ,4 rot dill 4, t 1rI (I'' Iu. ..t,C rr`Ir "gall r,'1 I 1 1.J . , i1;., . . L1
Sp-• a i1Ni70i..
8J f� Y �K� t•�;.
'r`.a1 Ir 7 1 MM�1MnfN i'�—
,.� ti'' l ; I ` � 1,: I, q. r; . I is
..
'ha lNosNnss. its.this , el lily dna to V- IA/ . 5 79 rw _t_ ,,
, . JAMES E. VESTING and MICHELE I. VETTING
•
o• wb.araMear.r 22670 Weld County Road 54, Greeley, Colorado 80831
part ice of the lint part,arad the NNW Truelove( Ceuatye( Weld .
i • In the etateelColoreds,party.the.Hoed part.WItne.wtb:
THAT,WHERE/MTheeaw parties of the first part
•
he VII executed their pnni..ery note bearing even data herewith,PH the principal sum of
• ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY AND NO/100Dou.rw
payabl.to the order of BETTY J. HIRSCH
• whe..eddm.r 2013 31st Street Road, Greeley, Colora o ap
f. ,J41 � arse
0' awl rawof--9'1/2---- rabic ann all .Ith lnt• t Ulm f
of 85,000.00, plus intteerest,ndue and payable In annual installment
'
payable on the 3rd day of Janus y
of each year, beginning January 3, 1981, with the entire outstanding
o principal and interest balances due and payable in full. on the 3rd d
O of January 1990. The note may not be pr
prepaid in whole or in part r
to January 3, 1985. If all or any part of the property, or an inter et
g therein is sold or transferred by makers without holder's prior writ en
.., consent, holder may at holder's option, declare all sums due and pay bleu
N
• W e
O
AND WHEREAS,The said part See of the Snit part are desirous of securing payment of the
principal and interest dealt'promissory note in whose hands meter lb.said note or any of them may be.
• NOW,THEREFORE.The meld part ie%f the first part.in consideration of the premises and for the purpose .
aforesaid.do herby grunt,bargain.sell and convey unto the said party of lb.second part in tru.t forever.the
following de a el bed proparty,ail nate In the County of Weld .State of Colorado,to wit:
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (El/
SW1/4SW1/4) and the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE •
1/4SW1/4) of Section Fourteen (14); and the East Half of the North-
•
•
west Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (E1/2NW1/4NW1/4)t and the
Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE1/4NW1/4) of Section
Twenty-three (23), all in Township Five (6) North, Range Sixty-five
(65) West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado, EXCEPT
parcels conveyed by instruments recorded September 18, 1901 in Book r'
187 at page 279, April 17, 1907 in Book 250 at page 102, April 29,
1969 in Book 609 under Reception No. 1530689, April 28, 1971 in Book •
" "
645 under Reception No. 1566580, February 7, 1972 in Book 661 under -
Reception No. 1583354, February 16, 1972 in Book 662 under Reception
• No. 1583763, July 7, 1975 in Book 742 under Reception No. 1664418,
and July 7, 1975 in Book 742 under Reception No 1664421, Weld Count
Records, together with one (1) share of Union Ditch Company and one
x,*x nexRreuumU)drXWhx (1) share of Lower Latham Ditch Company.
10 NAVE MO TO WILD the are,logmher.A i..d•firer h sharps r re...telaa,'dame*•le•/aw:la Two acr.11r1e1a.Thee in ..
law d data.Si.perms of aid..a a any d hr,w awe son Sad.a wile weave of the ironer thermos*exwdhrr w h Mae al elect
amid ale y dcr.a a h earrer d wry pethr auteethares.pra.iriet a Ykre-t.If mr.a le use desalt she M..4An a le cast d 1 �1
.Yin@ a bah airy of the tar.theadoeut.tv.erltr v egiarrage baits n+IW,the Mears ey lwrcadrr.r the bet Wider of IM Irtrd.daY 1
cam a tiaras of Stir cowman herds toresised So to war sawed nubScmay sad dared la sale wihks We of pd aid Ad elm red pulpit}
eMkn wad for ask atac a fele ale ad threat wheal...thew slew ria, ./ers
radru.snco �p1 i
at is eaeYbrr t he sane a ma. Of
the cep wY.* Ikeid al[Mae II mull
Trai a arilmay think
++ .I.. al..d pro)d1M sacral Immo '' ..
wi.d/apnea of h same Y@ row a a separate Iu<rh,u the s@'roar Tnnw may Ihid MDI ad all IS npl,nth sal Ytrrol
d..d son tee dhira sal,theinein a e..palh.eii.r plane are..a IS East thew dace of me Can Har.Y the Carly of wry
heal pleaWeethe ld we trap Y cast mof C Colorado.
taaeos td s ti harms a ay IberianIberianb teacake la the was d said la h Merushe 1 .""e,
7 aerloudr awn of the IS..sad plate of such sale.by advertise .
swath.la tat newspaper death e..uWYa at that lire Abashed to red cwayof Weld .icon of which make teal be nailed
w ithin brawn frunitw dew of the ant nNCYan tared in the ad pa its dint lint sort in Ow dd.tu MRmp.co and watch pews or
1 pan.Ile deer Ma Loch lake hoe MYeaaedw dr mord Tlnmtiii�dtwina rem.rid at iht
old meth**.
„I.,IM ven Moolttadrd lalrmmtR'.wMRIwIlY1M rural and mac,,
mtalcst a t'aleaa.Y waAdcarlbag mcb pump ba.A.Miele males sum.pod threw. Imo irk"
ugh roper*pwtl.stub wk.*
soenn pnbeset or punhrrs Madder
pima Mee Meru*dal he bclato e dad or.n c.i therefor.akah sane Jima he redeemed..n aurida by ln.: dud Plb4 Inurewnsii dull.ups
awes h h aria a argon hotline* aedr.itl.dradase.waen rad demand ir nate.,x won demand by IM plrrw and worked
P awl for h paper*pnMad a tMmro.xh Land n aide the tmsrbdiran lmtm•.Vawand malt.Me re.ut to mark person tear ma Wed of • '
date woe aid atgerr .• d,Ira h Yidddeda deed..Wad M in the adorn form as.nrrwrar ud.Ma he greed.link art and dear era by
la sold Public Twiner.a annlnr.aid.hall craves mid rupee lam to retch ple•o.,r pel..lnr entitled to ants Jred.as.likelier.
IM .ad property purchased at aft:raid end.1 Ow right.We.interne.benefit ad sow, of vdrmpone of the pen iea d the lust
pen, their Nw..N.„4„,MRY"rd Jai necia IS tam or rap for uhoh Yc tad potent•W oat and thee run tote power it we •
Pam ever.d.W w Out Seamen made by ryar ane:sad in cordon argument..wane*Mate or regaleste.ofppuunnlmv ..a of the
Wrs d rpi moth peen1.by a subsequent mta sower.
wall up a ent* Itdempa ell r•b Probe refit]cif w r on rue d&deed or bee Il a .
e mere of tale
and ma M sal rr Y well deed Of deeds and n•.aid Putt.Inner Owl.run of Ore pro.cid,or.rd,.t w.kirk.'errant pming ad moral all lest.
carps al cows of maw said Wt.My to the Wirth thy hertaaW re the legal thaw gf red rim the primtsol end moral due.n a'
•
nor marlin to the tar sad veto ternai and al more).Id;ward bee'at.howl,w,.r seal hidrt.t said lee for kowtow..
WY aid asesaasl...M areal area a 12 pt Cal per Millar ren.kui.e the...at. it.'l woo the u'rani B of the and
•
pat heir spnv.maWresarues;wlihsaleatiesandvddeedJrderdrr.md,dud*hitpetlntualhu.hwinbwadequity wartthe
midair ice doe In,pn. their Min ad nit*.and Jlahel r•nom.Luang the rat MYen*a ay an Penot by,
eta.awe or take said per ies ofthe ale WI.kw ay dim the inddel..holden.4 sad note or ato MO Pli“SS Yd Ptye*,aany son
in./:a ahoy ow he.bap.xy alp the paean a paeana an mat'Lawriewh gage.anon d h purchase money nankin;MN he
mumed.a b aired that the maims •du Inpas. their hen or swum.saw,iMe tonne thereof.
s 0
Na. •
341.A.DUD Or IWIt—PYr"—•— '.vi(` see•Pas
--*Vaal P.N.S.I,, Ifs ak.Yaml.Doan i.e...demtwit,-11.
I
•
' 891 was lea rrrrd.l rtilemeelves r+r their h.b r.ara� a 912621. iZd
Byte]♦';' WM/.w SS alas Wary eft and pLese seas Sas dt eualDcaehday east
". adD ( th
IMPS eY are .m Seel dt ldlw Sal aap s leas lope ISM vs somd at, vas..
r.Drq M pa.hapax..a a seta as sr is as rasa ad P .r hereby
�Yy W .odds tM Main
dda set they as
Y a w W W.lwtp. ln/ Yrrar lssial nrgvrrr�lr
aka Selese l Oaeand Awaetly ea .sAsu.waltdav a sdditq Seams '
weer add W sfassesiwnr.wr.
;. t t
a a an Sepia ppmny a Y at d pada prep of tae ma pony of the setae pan.he roorso a.W maps.east a ad tart'
paw a assY.tey thin.war.St at a ay pa lenat t aM pen ie 8 Sae Oa pen it a ail Wale W fame Delyd.
MI Ydmlpas tames der' ay psi pta.nI,sO�aai -d pen tee of lbw sty pat we it des aloe perilo.tsaw
ameemeassta aka*eta peaty.r mass des a amass.r.d.d db,wa a pea cassnam.nay:d H keep i**Sap ad..,s say
Dp ha as W Yea bats avian 1...by IS..Mn• warp,.adesrp.s I.etch anal of wlpeMee Is Lite ads of said
I
as ley.Imo Y.ra la'tad.Y.ri loaf ataramet cspay a aaetaln a.a r.av to sagas par of end Nirina.
her humor dM aacaprassi 'tpen i!8 drdn pa..iibes c.p.Elrrep.pre is the ua.altr.r .asp
awe as p.>a pasm d anal is Ile bemire y YnWn.a fW,r wawa fa de Kbrarr data.AY o oa al sin labs d rd 1 .
, pen is B din Manta sr.lava.,al Mw as picm dmrrc..a r prstoat,..rrsisa.rty.di.for,nave ulna.rag ,.
pair a,alraa..If w.as a awe dad a ,a,r d Ora ash rune*much bon tea.a pay mat as or coarse.,or nets des
pta pa ncS.rcn.II ay..s•aavy.GM ad .Yh mu.,l artar al . 12 p pleas pr pals lad ass so anf.tstk.S
WWdrr.walls the N.do a Ins. ltl b ta ad d the pass d b weans pnp sunned.
ny da ./saaYnir podia by W an letm
den pest a a b at hart dens a wane at do.cowast ad ep.er.. l ,
AND'MAT fN CAA Of ANY DOADLY.Wren%the at of faed.vw acs bead..the seas pan,'d de"ad run a ds Wen d W {:
ale a vats..,. shalt of pact...r, ot as be.aa arab,'n Us p„a.rw.sa ad see amp d the pnpny gloated.d in it rap..Yea and rya. t
pdtr drnd,bp.the said d ash Ili&and dune/at'gotta,of fun-Paste e fat tip d Ow p.md of redeephs.Y ear On be rd rash•
, •r
"...IS"sbdrer.be Mama sae tad any of Os paved pries r has oI .lass or condom atomism on nom..d a rand. 1 '�
is del ay nisch pass say be ntm'db the col pan,of at read pa a*raids af salaam wm,dkae d peale by of.•ppa'niss fad ' s n
civil IS a poaeiay.d ar mad pony of dr'acd pct.*the billet of aid vat ar an/..ce cpasr.a hey lsnd.shad be totaled boa I t
daeiM b ad popsy.d al as.eta as pullet triad.miler tech 15.5.aSet the to...wind by fawha.at pand.q d Y paled or (p•. V
rdt.aoa.dry an be.d iYb arid.theses aa seas of eye meh,.tepid to the udaay aatt.tay albs M ie 8 or the Ant
part a of r IS,ores of rid praeny ad w1 to,fiord to the eia arm{and ah Mwlm sty be aPened by at tarn d taeptat faidiolo• ,
.Pr.f pre finite as.Meta pore-acese bees lean ttpn.J)sassed-d a seat.ewes tad'loft'.onus d rtes ertdry all be
aid by such Iscewer to the maw of the osrae n,hen*..need aic.wJN to r Y+and Meads.d And:r of O.wan.
t AND.That Y le d ddai s attest afrrs d piergi of isnnt secants to IS lee is effect sisal pedaay.dr, amid.as)of S
theta.ay ay ponthend,ad•ba s d soy of ms y of the waa.Of a w aim bet ble lryanie8 r
das der pan. their) naaon,ad�.t.u.s or s .,s.do ye art the.lad.of alp.s s sp baby secured.d Oct acres .
the he same s to feat time Maid Inndebtevd.t.Lit a
Itl tedd. lea
dui t� be beam ea by the Yuba•of partly a ad TTruutee.a saran fee ci th,mans%
ic( a reasonable amount )mppD,r,..'icu him aper.am al use for odours made.epommd by me
Mho Taft ea pa olds to dMnkncn.sod IlMachtrat be sus Onadhr coat,asraaileanon y.raii Y,amdby the met r a pa stas a ,
WS dash tacbrt paaeida
mmRNIrsWNddmw.TM mid psi lee dda Ana pad s VS braeoaa their bade dada
as day as yet let ebony.ulna
Tapalrt
- .. (SEAL)
adi!;@ (SEAL)
�7�j ISEALI
�'! \"•'�,,{l7 EUY�'Q{MAIXy. The foram*arty.en s Ndpd tetra a.���� L_ �.
. Weld d,,,fADeT..I.7A, James E_Vetting end Michele I. ri:' ,, ],,
p _ca.yy4--- —_ .__ .. 4 '
i N. r'°`Y4 : o : Vetting, and each of them.
PUZ\- •e• ' by'aaida e.p*t gYfmOmWiYithekk hat e.IId1
� ybN.nt ddaW 4
0‘.. .(/le-..t'1.t..._._-/< -.. .x'1. +..3'— _ _
` TC or Notary Pak. .44411
sass
11 iI�
2
Iii I y F ,
,, ,
, ,, . . .
II �±7 4
, r,
k 11
„ . .4 1. ' .i I II ; ..•
W 1.1i
t(. gee O O L) t J � L • y �i ii
F I, c ia.
co m n II 9 4 p nl a a ,
yyy III It n . . • Ii L 1
C a d �l
',ti'''F .ku: um n V ' , 7ni'3 Y.p7 db.v:Hir 4:.•.4di:i 4.'.',i$„ 1 lei •,.'.C A. ry , t .sus
• t
/
b
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
July 30, 1985
James E. & Michele I. Vetting
22670 Weld Co. Rd. 54
Greeley, CO 80631
RE, Water Service
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Vetting:
This letter is in response to your request for the
availability of additional water service for the following
described property [
NE1 NW`s Sec. 23 and part SW1 sec. 14, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. ,
Weld County, Colorado
Water service is presently available to the above described
property by tap number 397 . Additional water service
can be made available to this property provided all
requirements of the District are satisfied .
Central Weld County Water District requires that contracts
be consumated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this
letter , or this letter shall become null and void unless
extended in writing by the District .
Very truly yours ,
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
flu v • /LC-/...c_G
Lo ene G. Hirsch
Office Manager
LH/caa
2235 2nd Avenus • Greeley.Colorado 80631 • (303)352.1284 • Dale D.Olhausen,Secretary-Manager
tat ,
u'
, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART
jy. ',,brief description of the soil profile. In each description, The acreage and proportionate extent of each map unit
the principal hazards and limitations are indicated, and are given in table 4, and additional information on proper
₹r 44 the) management; concerns and; practices: needed. are ties, limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many soil
discussed. ,�,•:,.-a . .
: r` uses is given for each kind of soil in other tables in this "
44944,The map units on the detailed soil maps represent an` survey. (See "Summary of tables.") Many of the terms'
yr area on the landscape made up mostly of the soil or soils used in describing soils are defined in the Glossary.
b ' for which the unit is named. Most of the delineations '
• _
* , shown on the detailed soil map are phases of soil series. Soil descriptions Y
"Soils that have a profile that is almost alike make up a $. _. ... s
1 soil series. Except for allowable differences in texture of "''1—Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep,
the surface layer or of the underlying substratum, all the well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900
soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major
',.1 composition, thickness, and arrangement in the profile. A rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that
i;J soil series commonly is named for a town or geographic show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small,
feature near the place where a soil of that series was long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. -
t first observed and mapped. Olney and Nunn, for example, Typically the surface layer of the Altvan soil is grayish
tp are names of two soil series.
brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown
^' Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam
,,•3* - !; layer or in the underlying substratum and in slope, ero- about 15 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy
NI
' eton, stoniness, salinity, wetness, or other characteristics sand about 6 inches thick over gravelly sand.
that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a Permeability and available water capacity are
,f. n, fail series is divided into phases. The name of a soil phase moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches.
:. commonly indicates a feature that affects use or manage- Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low..;
d ,Itiinset For example, Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent ' This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
'pea,is one of several phases within the Olney series. '' ' p commonly grown in the area, inelud-;'
r ; is suited to all crops
rr ra ." Some map units are made up of two or more dominant ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes,
y *finds of soil. Such map units are called soil complexes and and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3-
tl0differentiated groups. =, 'r . , -•"' by corn, corn for silage,
' 'soil;complex consists of areas of two or more soils to 4 years of s alfalfa followed
'y f• :are so intricately mixed or so small in size that they sugar beets, small grain, orle beans. The high clay content
. t and the rapidly permeable substratum slightly restrict
., gimaokbe shown separately on the soil map. Each area in- some crops.
some of each of the two or more dominant soils,
All methods of imgation are suitable, but furrow ir-
1. c •• the pattern and proportion are somewhat similar in
?rat .head. Midway-Shingle coin hex, 5 to 20percent slopes, wgation is the most common (fig. 4). Proper irrigation
" ', exam le. . p water management is essential. Barnyard manure and
t q p
commercial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
, undifferentiated group is made up of two or more
Winr, ,•' ,that could be mapped individually but are mapped as shrubs commonly eaks and environmental plantings of trees and
t because there is little value in separating them. grown in the area are generally well
a °r r �.�eattern and proportion of the soils are not uniform.
suited to this soil Cultivation to control competing
4, -' .area shown on the map has at least one of the domi- vegetation should be continued for as many years as
e ,' (named) soils or may have all of them. Loup-Boel possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and
sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, is an undifferentiated have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
• In this survey area. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
A . r host map units include small, scattered areas of soils hackberTy. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,
than those that appear in the name of the map unit. lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum.
Ci at#.,. This soil can r
.. of these soils have properties that differ substan- produce habitat elements that are highly
those of the dominant soil or soils and thus suitable for openland wildlife, including pheasant, cotton-
:_,..“74.:
significantly affect use and management of the map tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and
sons are described in the description of each alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife,
t a' . Some of the more unusual or strongly contrast- especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and
a3, *di that are included are identified by a special sym- undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil-
f i MI the soil map. dlife populations.
d ; YMt Mapped areas include places that have little or no This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban
> 'material and support little or no vegetation. Such and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea-
"4` are called miscellaneous areas; they are delineated tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten-
t' ,,.:._ "moil map and given descriptive names. Rock out- tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid
,'„:4, to an example. Some of these areas are too small to permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic
06$t I f�llneated and are identified by a special symbol on tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the
4 substratum does not contain enough fines to properly
t sal map
autos
`x '
n ,
8 •- - - - SOIL SURVEY •
filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. 60 percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter :,
Lawn; shrubs, and trees grow welL Capability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 6
Its irrigated) i, t'v ''1 c,, ., aor,,; how' A9 ry^,•.0 „ - percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam.•F 1-4.4,10'`'All-.-' !
2—Altvan loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed m,
well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typicaL Commonly the
feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al
rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey' surface layer and underlying
show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel
long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the
Typically the surface layer of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material
brown loam about 10 inches thick The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water
and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes
about 14 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. '
sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat
Permeability and available water capacity are Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage
moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops.
Surface runoff is medium,and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali
This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass,
is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent
ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in
and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As
to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali
sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass,_,
lining, and installing pipelines may be needed forproper . , .. M"'.;
P P sedge, and rush increase. . «� ��xaP •F, .
water application. Management of vegetation should be based on taking
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed
rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com-
ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac-
mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod.
Windbreaks and environmental cs trees and Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall
shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They
suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed
vegetation should be continued for as many years as preparation usually requires more than 1 year to
possible following planting.Trees that are best suited and eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used
have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Seeding early in spring has proven most successfuL
hackberry.
redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit
hlac, Siberian
The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover,
lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland,
This for can produce habitat elements including that are cohtton-ly where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec-
al, n mourning n dove.wildlife Su cops pheasant,c, cotton- tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and
tail, and Such crops as wheat, corn, and enland wildlife.
alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, o pe especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for
undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some
dlife populations. areas.
This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from
and recreational development The chief limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by
tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- livestock. They should not be drained.
tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as a source of sand and
permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site.
tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the 4—Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded. This nearly level
substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the
filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey
Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer,
Ile irrigated. make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which
3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25
nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained
of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of
which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface.
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 17
rid I '
k 'a,4 Typically the surface layer of this Colombo soil is dark Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
i ,,e4:-., grayish brown clay loam about 14 inches thick. The upper cropland areas provide ring-necked favorable habitat for ri
+`N 7; inches' of the underlying material is pale brown pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can
' °"stratified clay loam and loam. The lower part to a depth be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape
'14 of 60 inches is very pale brown loam stratified with thin cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen-.
" ? lenses of fine sand, medium sand, and clay loam. : tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop
r , ,: Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range-
k, ?I1..high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
' `1` Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
it In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
monly grown in the area including corn, sugar beets, Where this soil is on flood plains and is susceptible to
' • beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- flooding, it has poor potential for urban and recreational
• z y.pie of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa development. On the higher terraces, potential is fair.
4' ,• followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small in,
Dwelling and road designs may need to be modified to
or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing compensate for the limited capacity of this soil to support
pipelines may be needed for proper water application. a load and to protect it against frost action. Capability
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
subclass IIe irrigated, IIIe nonirrigated; Clayey Plains
' '. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- range site.
,,,
mercial fertilizer are needed for to 2 no clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes:This is a
p yields. deep, well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,550
`. In nonirrigated areas this soil is well suited to winter to 4,970 feet. It formed in mixed alluvium. Included in
s, `' wheat, barley, and sorghum if it is summer fallowed in al- mapping are small, long and narrow areas of sand and
fermate "years. Winter wheat is the principal crop. The gravel deposits and some small leveled areas. '
'• a wedicted average yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop Typically the surface layer of this Dacono soil is gray
k ivinterkilled, spring wheat can be seeded. Generally ish brown clay loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is
i r precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. grayish brown clay loam about 15 inches thick. The sub-
' ` „ $tubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- stratum is very gravelly sand. ' '
are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Permeability is moderately slow. Available water
e g also may be needed to control water erosion "- capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to
'The' potential native vegetation is dominated by 40 inches. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard
I a 4,irestern wheatgrass. Blue grama,` switchgrass, sand is low. • ' ""• ' ''' ' `
d ' nedgrass, big bluestem, slender wheatgrass, indiangrass, This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
, -4P,?ISM green needlegrass are also present. Potential produc- is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ-
•r * -=doll ranges from 1,000 pounds per acre in favorable years ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes,
i''10600 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3
i;14,deteriorates, the tall grasses decrease, blue grama and to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage,
` ,s bidlalograas increase, and forage production drops. Un- sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Generally, such charac-
rable weeds and annuals invade the site and erosion teristics as a high clay content or a rapidly permeable
occur as range condition becomes poorer. substratum slightly restrict some crops.
ment of vegetation on this soil should be based All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
half and leaving half of the total annual produc- rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water
$ceding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. management is essentiaL Barnyard manure and commer-
yl Wetern ,;' wheatgrass, switchgrass, sand reedgrass, cial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
b grams pubescent wheatgrass, intermediate Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
and blue grama are suitable for seeding. The shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well
selected should meet the seasonal requirements of suited to this soil Cultivation to control competing
vegetation should be continued for as many years as
It can be seeded into a firm prepared seedbed. possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and
Irma drill should be used. Seeding early in spring has have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
most successful. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,
,,,t.o, commonly grown in the area are generally well lilac, Siberian peashrub,and American plum.
?-1 Deed
to this soil. Cultivation to control competing Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove,
{,Wptation should be continued for as many years as and cottontail are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat
t following planting. Trees that are best suited and development, including tree and shrub plantings and
'"r ; good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be sue-
1 " vv4cedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and cessful without irrigation during most years. Under ir-
' keetherry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit-
, ear,Siberian peashrub, and American plum. ing, many kinds of openland wildlife.
a
4 '
18 SOIL SURVEY
This soil has only fair potential for urban and recrea- prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven
tional development. Above the sand and gravel sub- most successful 1 ` '
stratum the soil has moderate to high shrink swell, low, ` Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
strength, and moderately slow permeability. These fea= shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well
tures create problems in dwelling and road construction suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing
Excessive permeability in the substratum can cause con- vegetation should be continued for as many years as
Lamination of the ground water supply from septic tank possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and
leach fields. Sewage lagoons need to be lined. Capability have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
subclass Its irrigated. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
22—Dacono clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,
deep, well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,550 lilac, Siberian peashrub,and American plum. • '
to 4,970 feet. It formed in mixed alluvium. Included in Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove,
mapping are small, long and narrow areas of sand and and cottontail, are best suited to this soiL Wildlife habitat
gravel deposits and some small leveled areas. development, including tree and shrub plantings and
Typically the surface layer of this Dacono soil is gray- grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be suc-
ish brown clay loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is cessful without irrigation during most years. Under ir-
grayish brown clay loam about 15 inches thick. The sub- rigation, good wildlife habitat can established, benefiting
stratum is very gravelly sand. many kinds of openland wildlife. Rangeland wildlife, for
Permeability is moderately slow. Available water example, the pronghorn antelope, can be attracted by
capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to developing livestock watering facilities, managing
40 inches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
hazard is low. This soil has only fair potential for urban and recrea-
In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- tional development. Above the sand and gravel sub-
monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, stratum the soil has a moderate to high shrink-swell
beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- potential, low strength, and moderately slow permeability.
pie of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa These features create problems in dwelling and road con-
followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, struction. Excessive permeability in the substratum can
or beans. Generally, such characteristics as a high clay cause contamination of the ground water supply from
content or a rapidly permeable substratum slightly septic tank leach fields. Sewage lagoons need to be lined.
restrict some crops. Capability subclass IIe irrigated, Inc nonirrigated;
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- Clayey Plains range site.
rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water 23—Fort Collins loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a
management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- deep, well drained soil on terraces and smooth plains at
cial fertilizer are needed for top yields. elevations of 4,500 to 5,050 feet. It formed in alluvium
In nonirrigated areas most of the acreage is in small modified by thin eolian deposits. Included in mapping are
grain and is summer fallowed in alternate years. Winter some small leveled areas and few small areas of a soil
wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average yield is that is calcareous at the surface.
33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, spring Typically the surface layer of this Fort Collins soil is
wheat can be seeded. Generally precipitation is too low grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is
for beneficial use of fertilizer. brown and very pale brown clay loam and loam about 20
Stubble mulch farming, atriperopping, and minimum til- inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is
lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. fine sandy loam.
The potential native vegetation is dominated by Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
western wheatgrass and blue grams. Buffalograss is also high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more.
present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low.
per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ-
falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes,
vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage,
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac-
tion. Range pitting can help in reducing runoff. Seeding is tices are needed to maintain top yields.
desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grams, buffalograss, pu- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com-
bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well
firm sorghum stubble or it can be drilled into a firm suited to this soiL Cultivation to control competing
•
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE
Application No.
Subject Property
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names
and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under
the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names
appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or
from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney.
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this z.o
SS-
day of , 19$5 .
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My Commission expires:
My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1989
N 1
ary Public
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
SURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject Property
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,
addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the
Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within
five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list
was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership
update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such
records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list
compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been
assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date.
•
141
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 7..0
day of �i� n�ii,..1�... . . 1985 .
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My Commission expires:
My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1989
airy
ah'F�L n N
Noflary Public
R I tz.l.l'itii_•"Ar'P'l_.L(• ''1\ T; COPY-•-:itt.:"iD ...;•E._A: "';:;•' :1 MAY , .:'sx
{ ..E I SYSTEM PERMIT NO. G-850260
i••I.kr', �a ,F' INDIVIDUAL .�r.::4:� � �I::. r�.l::�l�`:;.:.(�L
WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REPAIR PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
1516 !•1t':1SF'ITr'd_ C•:OAD, GRE EL.EY, CO 8063i
353--0635 EXT.2225
MNER VETTING, JAMES I•. A i;,i}i•t E:`'S 22670 WCR $4 PH (.5:i _;) 339-5309
GR EELEY CO 80631
M t
I:J I:)ii L.,`.:.:>' OF PROPOSED SYSTEM 22378 i-•I E,;I''y' 3
"_rREELEY CO t:0ti3'i
.T_.tsi•IL DESCRIPTION OF SITE : SW * i;LM EEC 14 TWP .., t'.Ntx i:)::J
't.iw'cDIVI:;ION : LOT ;0 BLOCK ,0 FILING 0
I +I TYPE ' RESIDENTIAL
PERSONS '" Y.7 .i. r 1 SIZE 11 .00 ACRES
�::r�;�y.1.(.r l:...: • ;:, BATHROOMS f�T�J•1,•,,:a t"a i'1,`: � .(•,��l LOT•r ... ..�.r.--.:
.
I::....• .,C.. ,:, BASEMENT PLUMBING NO ,{ 'DTI.. SUPPLY CWCWD
�:,...A:I:,.J t.!I"I,.: 3 .�,.:I z>t:�i i I:::i�E , I��!._L I r r•1.,'. x WATER': .s.. I�_.�t
1r'PL_:fOAT:i:I„Ji'•< FEE $35.00
J..(.r AF BY Y RECEPTIONIST I-f•1.x"J SIGNED i ...•i''i.'-'..._r., .._: f`F I ,
DATE 101_d1 f05 DATE -10: 2'1 •'D5
'IERcoLATI(:1N RATE _____ MIN PER INCH WATER TABLE DEPTH FEET
!OIL!OILTYPE PERCENT GROUND ELOPE .__ DIRECTION ____
:QUIRES ENGINEER DESIGN ____
'ROM THE APPLICATION :INFORMATION SUPPLIED AND THE:: ON—SITE .`.>'UT.i... PERCOLATION i`.'iiiA
'Hi= FOLLOWING MINIMUM INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED :
SEPTIC TANK _____ GALLONS, ABSORPTION TRENCH ____ Q • FT.
DR
ABSORPTION BED ,'Q. FT.ADDITION, THIS PERMIT 3:,' SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL TERMS AND
'iJNDIT.CON.:
-HIS PERMIT IS GRANTED TEMPORARILY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TO COMMENCE. THIS PERMIT
i°rY BE REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH i i DEPARTMENT i'.:1 i'ii::.i•...i' FOR REASONS(: ik::, 'F•T'
Ui:T I••I .I.i''! THE 'iiii._D COUNTY
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE D:i:.`.. r' :a.:''Al._ SYSTEM REGULATIONS INCLUDING
A I...URi. TO i''i1:.I::.r ANY ; i::.rtii OR CONDITION IMPOSED ! 1"1!::.t':iWt_ii'! DURING TEMPORARY OR FINAL
,F FROIVAL.. THE ISSUANCE E OF THIS F'ERMT:T. ODES NOT CONSTITUTE ASSUMPTION BY 1I-lIE.
_ EMPLOYEES
,, .., :.. _ FOR THE FAILURE
:. r t t I- OR INADEQUACY_._i(_ 1 {
�.r r�;t-; I t`i E:.i•�T OR F; .t T:'• c�r'I I='1..i:J l'E l::.::> �.�i- LIABILITY r• I i•�i• :�l_...i:i r-. OR :i.i f�i.I_.t:..• i�1_:Y �F .l_I..i it:EWAGF DISPOSAL _
�,.rr. -r-i.�_..,_ry.f.2:,'.x Cs-�-,,, ,_,t eP fir? ENVIRONMENTAL'L.•( r�_Q..__...._....___...... .._._.....__._.
SPECIALIST DATE
I E
-5-e--,41C. O,,'... K2 c
-HIE PERMIT I rS NOT TRANSFERABLE ERFBIBi_.I:. AND r.)i•iAI...L BECOME I: ,r'OI... IF .`S r`:_ .:.M CONETRUCTION HAS
...T COMMENCED
.'�F _•_, ISSUANCE.i••;(-: BEFORE
•r G- ISSUING rt FINAL APPROVAL 1rI OF
'; I ;.:,1�'ti"t'�:"�ll�L..f3 WITHIN ONE YEAR •..:, ITS .i.,::,::�..ir•I .. _. .riiWf:.(.}E'...:. ..� il:�lx I�"..I'�'f�;;... i-1:'r}:,.. u,'i,._
-HIS
PERMIT
T• WELD COUNTY
11:' .T. •1 DEPARTMENT RIGHT fi •� tiL s.►
I'•IJ.S F'C:F.I�I.�-T THE Iui::.�D t�c.��.1r,E ; t i•',�....� ... E, i ,.:.I-1"I ft : iriiEi'J'T' RESERVES Ti'T'i••IE '1- .. IMPOSE r��l�:
":11'riI._ Ti RI 1 AND CONDITIONS I:E::+: t.1::RE:D TO MEET OUR REGULATIONS ON A CONTINUING BA—
NES, FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON •T'i'•,i::. FINAL INSPECTION OF .T. I I::. :t.J M....
' _i:Ti:::.Ds SYSTEM BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
D giff
EXHIBIT
•
c; t :7¶ 1S1985
/ I- �s Osmium'
Weld Co. Among
December 18, 1985
Members of the Board of ei d County Commissioners :
7:le would like to amend our Use by ryneciel Review
Application (USR-704-85:49) to read 140 cows instead of
250 cows.
It was called to our attention by the Weld Counts Panning
Com!ri s1.on_ that we had asked for too many nni mA s on the
described property. Thank you for your consideration of
the issue.
cerei.y,___:James E. Vetting;
Michele T. Vetting
in"',1Vim,.F.. . ' il,fil".J.i1- i
�L '1+ .. '1_.x_..1 r I
' J f+
l:' ♦� V� I.
f EXHIBIT
/ I
,-L kV-s
DATE: December 2 , 1985
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
FROM: Clerk to the Board Office
Commissioners:
If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the
following hearing for the 18th day of December, 1985 , at 2 : 00 P.M.
Docket No. 85-92 - James E. and Michele I . Vetting - USR,
Livestock confinement operation (250 cows)
OFFICE OF THE CLE TO THE BOARD
BY: ///,L/O!/ V Deputy
The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled
on the agenda as stated above.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
/ /
V-7r,
L
Hello