HomeMy WebLinkAbout850510.tiff ORDINANCE NO. 108
PERMIT NO. 85-13
PERMIT FOR PLOWING GRASSLAND
APPLICANT NAME: James E. Sievers
ADDRESS : 43605 Rd. 89
cqu
til
Briggsdale, CO 80611
o
v 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CULTIVATED (Map delineating
the proposed land use change attached) :
Pt. of SE; of Section 3 , Township 8 North, Range 61 West
of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
r V (See attached map)
iM
z APPROVED SOIL CONSERVATION PLAN ATTACHED. Yes
ri
rJ
PERMIT ISSUED BY THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.oPa _
z L/ ndowner
'/
E.3 s DATE : Y /v/yS Weld County Clerk & Recorder
C and Clerk to the Board
z
SEAL
c.tr-0-7.C43
De uty County Cl k
This permit is issued pursuant to Weld County Ordinance No . 108
adopted by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners
on May 19, 1982 , and requiring the issuance of permits for
the plowout and cultivation of grassland. Pursuant to Ordi-
nance No . 108, the landowner is required to follow a conserva-
tion plan approved by the local Conservation District Board.
The landowner is advised to contact the local Soil Conserva-
tion District Board for any amendments or updates to the
Conservation Plan .
880510
PURPORTED COPY
PA 6J lc,% N!EL[_ CC1
Township _, Range , County State
ORDINANCE NO. 108
PERMIT NO. 85-13
t
1
t
. F : I
} E '
1 I I I.L. 4 i i 1 i
L I
, ,
t 1
, 1--
j i I
I I
I 6 } '
I
! tt I I 1
1 , i 10 {� , -12- -
I i ' I - -
i i
I
1 I
I
t 'i
1 t
I I I 1 1 E i
I t
I
I
t
t
I I i I I 4 I
1 I 20 } =� ss — s2 I 2a f
} I I I I
I
I
t
' I
2I 2Y 2i 27 26 2S +
I
I I
i
4
I !
]1 ]2 =2 ]4 7S ]6
I I }
I
= I
I I € I I I }
I
FORM 5O1
Wiest Greeley Sod Conservation District
P.O. L.;', SU Giculcy Loh,: Ji, 80632
RESOURCE 0R LAND USE PLAN REVIEW
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNEi.
Name : James E. Sievers 1:ame: SAME
Address: 43605 Rd. 89 Address:
Briggsdale, CO 80611
DATE OF REVIEW: March 11 , 1985
ACREAGE BY LAND USE IN! COESERVATLON PLAN:
108 ac. to be converted from grassland to non-irrigated cropland
LECAI, DESCRIPHOE OF PROPERTY NO ON C.LTPIATED: Ginn L linoatini Lilo proposed Innd use
uneneT. ELtsiseed,
108 ac. in Pt. SE„ of Section 3, T8N, R61W
PLAN DISPOSITIO ;: Plan approved as presented.
COI1IIENTS: .
WEST CREELNY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD
!3y: 544/S-.1-',��EcGrc
Rev. (,/8
tl Id
r -
N
J fJ
S
.--
r0
-r -O
co
;Q
JG N
_w O
m -
a in
CD
ro 0_ E I
1 to 0_ N I ,
F. C
N•
..n
con
Y'
U • l w
—J 0- C N
_ _ -
C> - III - I C - U
- C - 0 G U
U t
TO Ti U
R o`
cc Cc, - N O0. vi
o 0
O Z C y- C on O U_
U — E co U ; _
W — E CCTr T-C a
_ C) ._ _4--L
T 11 G ii, O
Q -' LLB (� _C Q O
U N O'1 n U
IJJ u!!. _ lc. of '
a. I - :- o'
n. m s.n s ti r. wII I
Q CO �� _j oo I i
z L-
a
O 'Ii I
�_ o -, I
LL -- C �I
0
M
a Ll.l r.I I
1 I 1
L'. I
CT
_1 a
O I C
C] co .J cOI 1 c
III -
al CC -I, I -
�+- . I 1
3 �, u,
LI I co
,I I - ,_�O
VI O 0 N NI '' -FF.! Z
vII i I
EE I I •_ _I Z
I ! o c
R� O7 N
I
I I in 0
NI
I �I 0 Li
of — U tDI
iv'
o Oy _
u 1—
.
a;
C
VI .n I
z o W - o ��
U ., C t� _
J .. I
V I
m U I I
cu ELRVATICN SERVICE 1-s2
RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS
AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION
PLANNED APPLIED
FIELD MONTH LAND USE AND TREATMENT
NO. AMOUNT YEAR AND
YEAR
108 ac. 1985 To be converted from grassland to Non-Irrigated
Cropland
CTU 1 , NON-IRRIGATED CROPLAND, Field 1
1 108 ac. 1985 (589) WIND STRIPCROPPING : Strips to be established
perpendicular to prevailing wind direction at a
width not to exceed 330 ft.
1 108 ac. 1985 (328) CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEM: A 2-year
cropping system will be used consisting of small
grain and fallow.
1 108 ac. 1985 (329) CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM: A minimum
tillage system will be followed whereby subsurface
tillage implements such as chisels , sweeps and
rod weeders will be used. Tillage operations will
be held to 4 or less during normal years and
tillage operations will only be those essential
for weed control . Crop residues will be maintainec
at the rate of 800 lbs . per acre flat small garin
stubble after planting for 330 ft . stips as shown
on attached SCS-CONS-7 form
COOPERATOR ASSISTED BY DATE
Jim Sievers Greg Snell 3/85
iii l'-'! I •
- i i ; I
_ .,7 •
I j
•
� � r I f I ! I
�� , ! I
F- .oft— •• ' •
I—
C� r I ! I I I•
el
I i •
• cc) c+ I E I I• j I I I I 1 I
•
' I j . I I •
i•Lt: —_ - - TEi'
; ' I
Q �n t^ ; ` II I 1 • 4 p
CC ,- �_ O' I I I c:
rn O. I w
w ^� �� •ea _MI I j I I I I U 3 Z.
v
•••• 'T I I `� A C4-
y0 — a J I _.ir • ' N — y..
i I 'i
<7; n_ ��" I I i I r;
LJ ( :i) I I C_)
•
C_ w • . - c0' I ••
•
•
I
Z _ • L._ II Q j• i
.ti I M •
I i I I I
` _
M•
•
C •
r ) ti7 V u
C> • j '
L I a C-.: LA
!i, _ c61 . • , I ! l', -i 7
r a i i .•
::r
-- ._. _ -i ._- k_ i t - I Z.
o .I
i i I O
�I I I I i �� C.
1 C)I I yi
I c. •
0131'
•
r' •' �_j 'I, r I I
IH
•
i I
I
r•
UNITED STATES DE AhXU NT Ce e . rill1; i' t.. ''cclr. ] ,,. L bride
Soil Conservation Service_ Section Ill'
Colorado All Field fit Noes
S ANDA'gUS AND SI'EClUlCATIPl.
CDNSERVATTMN Cle. PPING SYSTEM facce) 322
,;e`i.ritlon Specifications
Growing crops by using a i . Dry Cropi. ;11
eombin.-,tio;; of oeriel u .__..reel an:
management measures C,_oppi :5 a. cropping reel:once sue!,
systems lnclucIT r c t: ion; that ar cbeTt - -:Llo.awheat-
captain „ -...,se , reid 'io 'Jumou , ,_, .-Fel :1T a.Li w ci `Chicr
well as rot -t ous I �'hicli tl:c wi ! L he _p/ tel
desired benefit:; ;ire i hiererd cent will u . , . inoleo:late
ai tl�ouC. the rce O: .
V I tL:JO;1'' ,'i')3 io: .
Td .prove or cood. . Crop ru L_
aril: _(111 ^_O3u iti O❑ i .ho
O, ..t Lho >o . . pie I , 1L roilL, II r . an
uTddc , _nS':C , a::i i Tel
meet the pee/ end desire Vr c. dflie bc:yerpal. S, 1 duns
ermels too pn
V err,:r;ir.. !li11 be uire,l to
C,:::-.litioss where ar .cti ,,a dn'TtloT dot, roi .ie adequacy r.c chc
(Ar' o11 cropland ...:,i an _. ...:in
recreation and oi. Ldlif^ :1. Irrigated Cropland
Planning Consideratlonc a. The Soil Condition Rating
— -- — —-- Indices for Irrigated Crop,; ,
An application of 1.i.-rogen should Agronomy "ieehuical Note
he considered in thc, early stages will be need to determine
of a high residue management tin; arie:a•,:acp of the crophun;1
pro ran t .. rerlace tilat ' ici up le rueuence cud soil. :ertiiit;;
the decomposition process. m,iiluLc
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado P.L1. field Offices
March 1983
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
STRIPCROPPING, WIND (Code 589)
B. Strips will run approxi-
Standard mately perpendicular to
the prevailing wind
Definition direction.
Growing wind-resisting crops in C. Maximum Strip Widths
strips alternating with row crops (narrower strips provide
or fallow and arranged at angles better protection and
to offset adverse wind effects. require less protective
cover) .
Purpose
1 . 0-2% slope, 660 feet
To reduce wind velocity at the widths (40 rods) .
ecil surface, thereby reducing
soil blowing and damage to crops . 2. 2-5% slope, 330 feet
To trap snow and increase stored widths (20 rods) .
soil moisture.
3. 5% or greater slope , 165
Where applicable feet widths ( 10 rods) .
On cropland subject to soil D. Wheat stubble in the
blowing and where needed as part protective strips will be
of a cropping system for snow left standing through the
catchment and moisture critical erosion period.
conservation. (Nov. through May) .
Specifications E. A minimum of 500# of
residue will be left on
Follow guidance set forth in the soil surface after
"Guide for Wind Erosion Control planting for soils in
on Cropland in Great Plains WEG' s 1 , 2 , 3 & 4 . If the
States" (Revised 1976) , or Guide for Wind Erosion
Agronomy Technical Note #53, to Control or Technical Note
calculate widths of wind strips. #53 indicate larger
amounts are needed, then
I. Wheat-Fallow Systems those amounts should he
left on the surface after
A. Strips of wheat will be planting.
planted alternately with
the stubble from the
previous crop; in
approximately equal
widths to facilitate
rotation.
TCN #200
Striperop Ping, Wine ,89-3
3/83 TC11 200
-'-
II. Annual Row Crop Systems
A. Strips of high residue producing crops wilt be grown in alternate
strips with erosion susceptible crops. Strips will be approximately
perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction.
B. Width and spacing of protective strips:
1 . Row Crop Plants — ilinimum width of protective strips will be the
equivalent width of 4 rows spaced 40 inches apart . Spacing
between strips will not exceed 30 feet .
2. Drilled Plants — Minimum width of protective strips will be two
rows (12" — 20" spacing) and the spacing between strips will not
exceed 30 feet .
C . The protective crop will be h rvested with a cembine ot owed tea_"in
stubble 12 to 18 inches tail. Ite protective residue will ee
left on the soil surface tnrouvh the critical wind erosion season
,Nov—May) or until the seedhmi is prepared for the following nrop
which is expected to occur in early April. Spring seedbed
preparation should result in a ridged surface for wind erosion
protection.
III. Perennial Tail Grass Barriers
A. Only tall growing species such as tall wheatgrass , switch rass , bi ;
bluestem, sand bluestem, Basin wiltlrve and Indiangrass will be
planted. Range site descriptions and Critical Area Planting
specifications will Be used to determine specie adaptation .
B . Seedbed preparation will consist of only those operations necessary
to assure a firm soil condition relatively free of weeds. Planting
in residue from a previous crop is acceptable.
C. Colorado Agronomy Note No. 61 will be used to determine amounts of
seed to plant .
D. Barriers shall consist of at least two rows of grass spaced .10-40
inches apart as a minimum.
E . Optimum barrier spacing will he determined using the Guide for Wind
Erosion Control and will be designed as close to this optimize as
possible considering equipment widths .
F. Weed control will be practiced as needed to control competition until
grass is well established .
G. Barriers will be periodically mowed or clipped to a minimum height of
8-10 inches to encourage regrowth and prevent decadent stands from
developing.
UNITED STATES DEPART?LENT OF ACLICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section LP
Colorado All Field Offices
February 1982
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
•
CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM (Acre) 329 c
Standard
Definition
A form of noniversio❑ tillage that 1 . Zero tillage, slot planting or
retains protective amounts of residue no-till.
mulch on the surface throughout the
year. These include no-tillage , strip This is a method planting into
tillage, minimum tillage and other prior crop residue bv disturb-
types of noninversion tillage. fug only the immediate area of
the row. Crop residue is left
Purpose on the surface for erosion
control.
To protect the soil from erosion and
help maintai ❑ or develop good soil 2. Strip tillage.
tilth, and desirable water infiltra-
tion rates and water storage . Tillai*e operations for seedbed
,reparation are limited to a
Conditions where practice applies strip not to exceed one-third
of the distance between rows .
On cropland and on certain other A protective cover of crop
lands where annual vegetation is residue remains o❑ the
grown. balance. Tillage and planting
are accomplished in the same
Planning considerations operation.
Conservation tillage provides a pro- 3. Minimum Tillage
duction system that leaves crop resi-
dues on the surface after planting. Limiting the number of tillage
Crop residues are left standing as operations to those essential
long as possible prior to the succeed- to control weeds , improve soil
ing crop to trap blowing snow. Herbi- aeration, permeability and
cides are used immediately following tilth. Sweeps, rod weeders or
harvest, prior to and during planting, straight shank chisel imple—
to control volunteer grain and other meats will be used.
vegetation.
Specifications
This practice is most effective when
carried out in conjunction with other A. The primary objective is to
practices such as strip cropping, accomplish weed control with
terracing and contour farming. no tillage or with a limited
• number of conservation tillage
One of the following conservation operations, so that adequate
tillage systems should he used: amounts of crop residue can he
maintained for protection from
erosion.
TCN ft182 2/82
329-2—Conservation Tillage System
B . The minimum amount of crop residue left on the soil surface after -�
planting shall be 1 ,500 pounds per acre of corn or sorghum residua , or
500 pounds per acre of flat small grain residue or its equivalent .
C. Soil loss by water and wind shall be rcdeced to the loss tolerance
established for that soil . The Universal Soil Loss Equation and the
Wind Erosion formula can be used to arrive at the amount of residue
necessary to keep the soil loss within Limits .
Table 1 — A Guide for Estimating Residue Reduction from Tillage Operations
Approximate Percent of
Residue Reduction After
One Trip or Pass Over
Tillage Operation the Field
Rod Weeder 10
Sweeps (30" or more) 10
Rod Weeder and Seuic'hisel 15
Field Cultivator — ( 1b-1d inch sweeps) 25
Till Planter 20
Chisel Plow (straight shanks) 20
Chisel Plow ( twisted shank) 51)
One—Way or Tandem Disc 50
Moldboard Plow 75_100
i
U. On systems '.where tillage operations are permitted :
1 . Subsurface tillage equipment should be used to keep the residue on
the soil surface.
2 . On soils that tend to crust, or with some slope to them, a chisel
type implement may need to be used after harvest to increase water
infiltration and reduce soil loss due to runoff.
3. Chemicals may be used to aid in reducing or eliminating tillage
operations . Use manufacturers labels or Colorado Weed Control
Handbook for specific rate recommendations. The following options
are recommended.
a. Fall sweep (4 inches deep) plus Atrazine. Fall sweep
immediately (within two weeks) after wheat harvest to kill
existing vegetation. Atrazine applied immediately following
fall sweep will kill volunteer wheat and weeds until the next
summer. Limit summer tillage operations prior to planting.
b. Apply a combination of non—selective contact or non—residual
herbicides (such as Paraquat or Roundup) plus Atrazine to kill
existing weeds and for long—term weed control. Limit summer
tillage operations .
TON 187 2/32
Conservation Tillage System 329-3
•
c. Contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short: residual
(45-60 days) may be used For spring application to eliminate
early spring and early summer tillage. Limit summer tillage
operations.
d. 2-40 Butyl Ester plus atrazine or a short residual trrazine is
an economical alternative if approximately 90'% of the fill weeds
are broadleaf. Limit su,,::ter tillage operations .
E. For no-till systems:
1 . Conventional tillage operations will not he used to control volun-
teer crop growth or annual fortis and grasses. On soils with a heavy
clay or silty surface that tend to seal, a light crust breaking may
he needed using sweeps or a chisel using straight shanks.
a. Wheat-fallow (chemical only) - [ise of chemicals to eliminate
tillage operations. The tulLowinf is required:
( 1 ) Contact herbicides , such as Paraquat or t(oundup , plus
atrazine or residual and tank mixes such as atrazine-3ladex
and atrazine- ['gran shall he applied i nr.r.rrdintely following
harvest to kill e_isting; weeds and give long-term weed
control.
(2) A short residual herbicide may he used for spring; applica-
tion if necessary to control weeds to substitute for
tillage operations normally used .
(3) A slot or no-till planter or grain drill shall he used that
will disturb not more than 253 of the soil surface.
b. Corn, sorghum, and small grains (chemical only) . Use of chemi-
cals to eliminate tillage operations in irrigated cropland or
annual cropping systems. The following is required:
(1 ) A contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short
residual (45-60 days) may he used for spring application if
needed to control weeds to eliminate early spring and early
summer tillage.
(2) A slot or no-till planter or adequate grain drill shall be
used that will disturb not more than 25% of the soil
surface.
( 3) Atrazine may be used in a wheat-sorghum-fallow or a wheat-
corn-fallow sequence.
F. Farmers must be made aware of the hazards involved in using residual
herbicides.
TON nId2 282
325-4—Conservation Tillage System
1 . Caution must be exercised in use of atrazine on sLIL,; with a pi! Lit 7i
7 .5 or higher.
2 . Caution should be taken when applying; Lone; residual herbicides
annually so no overlap or carry—over efiect of chemical o:c:.rs .
3 . A minimum of 20 gallons of water, preferably 3U , will be needed to
get adequate coverage of chemical.
1 . For more uniform application, Large volume .,prayers with wide stable
boom coverage are preferred over small units with narrow coverage.
The wider swath should result in fewer overlaps or skips. Oust
should be held to a minimum as it deactivates some herbicides .
Nozzle spacing should not be greater titan 4C inches tar ur.ifor.n
distribution.
G . Specific chemic11 recemaend- tions shall be is accordance with container
labels and/or Colorado Weed Control Handbook.
Trade names were used Ia this standard only to ,.t;ike me inrormation
understandable. This does nor imply endorsement of certain pi- bluets or
criticism of products not named or crop rioned .
TCN 1;182 2/82
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-CPA-68 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 82
RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS
AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION
PLANNED APPLIED
FIELD MONTH LAND USE AND TREATMENT
NO. AMOUNT YEAR AND
YEAR
1 108 ac. 1985 To be converted from grassland to Non-Irrigated
Cropland
CTU 1 , NON-IRRIGATED CROPLAND, Field 1
1 108 ac. 1985 (589) WIND STRIPCROPPING: Strips to be established
perpendicular to prevailing wind direction at a
width not to exceed 330 ft.
1 108 ac. 1985 (328) CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEM: A 2-year
cropping system will be used consisting of small
grain and fallow.
1 108 ac. 1985 (329) CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM: A minimum
tillage system will be followed whereby subsurface
tillage implements such as chisels, sweeps and
rod weeders will be used. Tillage operations will
be held to 4 or less during normal years and
tillage operations will only be those essential
for weed control . Crop residues will be maintained
at the rate of 800 lbs. per acre flat small garin
stubble after planting for 330 ft. stips as shown
on attached SCS-CONS-7 form
COOPERATOR ASSISTED BY DATE
Jim Sievers Greg Snell 3/85
3/06/35 SOIL LOSS TABLE
:::i1CawPjan
TILL GE PRACTICES
...__..____....___._.____._-__-._..__.--'--_._-__.___ .�._.....--DOWN- ._... ;CROSS SLOPE CONTOUR CROSS �Ii_!.)f'1-: CONTOUR
MAPPING UNIT Ur t r
:'r
SUMMARY HILL W/O STRIPS FAR9I,17, 1TH STRIPS ETRIi-'::..
;-.ON44 OLNEY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO PERCENT SIORE
-. . .20 R= 60 l_. 1,00 ,.I: SE G= .1
- .1
r:
r:�; C:I +E LENGTH 400 '1 .t»v.r fl.Vim:.} .i.c I '''!'u.+4.'..
.:: FACTOR OS' 1 , 00 . 55 „ .._0 37 , 25
L = • j I: tic G
c 1. . 21 ' = . , 0
_
z j'
L:, P .-
1. • , SOIL 1.°__ LO SP 4� � ... 4. 9 - ••i� .._. ... � .�+
t:.r:j 1 , 0 L . 00
• MAX
; SLOPE PE LENGTH :tl.l f'i7 .('t;,. . 00 400
• . 2 FACTOR . D0 . 25 . 25 ,25 i
, 25
,, C1' 61 GTE??''':EHAt'I FINE SANDY LOAM, .: _. PERCENT
,-, 1 SOIL LOSS 1 .3 . 1 .7
4. 3 _ 4.7
) MAX C VALUE t . 93 1 , 00 1 . 00 1 . 00
' 0C� �+ 4 0 00 4fit0
.5) MAX ELOPE LENGTH "r L]�`t :,r..�1.: P FACTOR 1 . 00 . 85 . 50 . 37 . 25
NOTES=
• O
IL SE:; IN TONS/ACREOR EACH P VAL...UE.
) DIFFERENCE IN EROSION RATE FROM T VALUE. A ' +' INDICATES THAT EROSION
THAT EROSION ._i LESS .THAI. ,
,� - INDICATES - ,.-.. r_ -,
EXCEEDS. y �{ � AKEEP r_'• � :_r I UNDER-r •• FOR THE -.r t,i•-.� SLOPE.
,.
• H MAXIMUM C VALUE. HAT WOULD 1.E' I SOIL )C3 I .ER f. . . . ..
• THE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH THAT WOULD KEEP SOIL LOSS
GIVEN C VALUE.
: ELECT AN OPTION FOR FUTHER PROCESSING
1 , START OVER, BUILD A NEW TABLE.
2) ADD MORE MAP UNITE TO THE ABOVE TA.BI_E. AND PRINT AGAIN.
-:' RE--COMPUTE THE LAST MAP UNIT WITH DIFFERENT ERENT c. OR LS FACTORS.
4) STOP ( RETURN T`.) t RIE) ,
NUMBER�_.)-_R r. 1-4'' . ►
9-.G . 1 ENDED,
CS-CONS-I6 _. __
C CTOOER 1974 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP
Owner S-^ Str`ccs Operator Si
County ,,--c\k State (f2(o,ra(o Date -111I/1"-.'7
Approximate acres Approximate scale ,." !wI b
Cooperating with -'-t'sf E-7re-4 4. S;-`I Conservation District
" Plan identification Photo number —""
I- I Assisted by USDA Soil Conservation Service
% % /
I ,/ ,,5 / %/ / ;/ / N
% ii (-\ / / � ,/ / li / . V/ / / \''/ 1 \()// ‘A\// , ,_
i, / / / / // I V/ / u
/ / %
. I
i
I ' N3
13c7
-
I
F.: I
j
SCS-CONS-15 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUI 1
OCTOBER 1974 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP
Owner 1 S'r\ei'ti Operator. --,,"e
County c-. 'ke i State ( (o
Soil survey sheet(s) or code nos. wt=om' Approximate scale '-- I ''I
N Prepared by U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service cooperating
f with G=rstt GI,-•tt Sa4 I
Conservation District -_
r /
' ICI° J 1,7 1��/ /'
/ /
/ / / l // /
// :j /I %/ i'/i1 y / U /
�I / 2� / r1, , / V` / ` /k I� v
/ / ; /�/ ' N.\..
� 4
4;=_`..
A
5+
• f
L h3
135 .9
i
1
Per A �� n3 ti �.� �. �. : �. q F �,
� � �` /fir ° , 1
1 /^ h Ar
\ / / , /.
Hello