The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About870051.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A CHURCH AND SCHOOL - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 21st day of January, 1987 , at the hour of 2: 00 p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church, 737 Bross Street, Longmont , Colorado 80501 , for a Use by Special Review for a church and school on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the SEA, Section 2 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Ken Dell, of Rocky Mountain Consultants, and WHEREAS, Section 24. 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and , having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24. 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District. The proposal does not appear to have any adverse impacts on the agricultural interests of the County or the environment. 7 )/ i2 / /2/1 , - i� 'i. 870051 Page 2 RE: USR - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. This proposal will be compatible with the existing and surrounding land uses. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Use by Special Review for a church and school on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is , granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . Prior to recording the Use by Special Review Plat: a. The plat shall be amended to show a road reservation for the realignment of the I-25 Frontage Road and evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the State Highway Department has approved the size and location of the road reservation. h. A copy of a plan for soil erosion control, landscaping, and surface water runoff shall be approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District and submitted to the Department of Planning Services. c. The plat shall be amended to show no access onto Weld County Road 24-1/2 . d . The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat. 2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur, nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until: a . The Use by Special Review plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services Office and the plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 870051 Page 3 RE: USR - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH b. Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the Longmont Fire Protection District has reviewed and approved the working drawings for any building or portions of building planned for construction. c. An Off-Site Road Improvements Agreement has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County Road 24. d. An agreement shall be established between the ditch company and the church in regard to the safety of the children. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 21st day of January, A.D. , 1987 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD CO NTY OLO DO Weld County Clerk and Recorder • and Clerk to the Board G a , airman BY:__ C914:4,144_ a/ 1, ,�./ C.W. Kir y, Pr -Tem eputy County �lerk // EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE APPROVED AS -TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner EXCUSED c C(-) Jacqueline Johnson ro is my Attorn � yyyy��.u- w.7,--�z(, Frank Yamaglithi 870051 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church USR-769 : 86: 50 1 . The Use by Special Review permit is for a church and a school as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2 . The applicant shall implement and maintain the soil erosion control, landscaping and surface water runoff plan approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District. 3. No structure or portion of a structure shall exceed eighty feet in height with the exception of the steeple or other nonhabitable appurtenances. Said steeple or other nonhabitable appurtenances , or any part thereof, shall not exceed 100 feet in height. 4 . Prior to construction , the existing farm house and out buildings shall be removed and disposed of in an approved landfill. 5 . The Use by Special Review site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. 6. The Use by Special Review facility shall not be used on any basis as a dwelling or as a temporary housing for any person. 7. The Use by Special Review area shall have three accesses, one from Weld County Road 24 and the other two from I-25 Frontage Road as shown on the Use by Special Review plat. An access permit from the State Highway Department shall be obtained prior to the construction and use for all accesses onto I-25 Frontage Road . 8 . All construction on the property shall be designed and built using the best techniques available to prevent radon gas from entering the structures and shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 9. The applicant shall comply with the supplementary district regulation requirement of Section 42. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 10. The property owner or oeprator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 . 5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 870051 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 12. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to insure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 870051 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 87-1 RE: USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A CHURCH AND SCHOOL - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH A public hearing was conducted on January 21, 1987, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Chairman Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson - Excused Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated January 5, 1987, and duly published January 8, 1987, in the Johnstown Breeze, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church for a Use by Special Review for a church and school. Chairman Lacy explained that, with only four Commissioners present for this hearing, if a tie vote should result the absent Commissioner would review the record and listen to the tapes of this hearing prior to casting the deciding vote. Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Keith Schuett, Planning Department representative, read the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission, which is subject to two Conditions and fourteen Development Standards, into the record. He stated that the Planning staff recommends that the Board consider the staff's original Development Standard #3, which would allow that no portion of any structure exceed eighty feet in height. Ken Dell, of Rocky Mountain Consultants, came forward to represent the applicant. He submitted Exhibit F, the USR plat map, and Exhibit G, a floor plan of the proposed facility. He explained the plans for the church and school. He said the church is willing to meet the proposed Conditions and Development Standards, but requested that the Board retain Development Standard #3 as proposed by the Planning Commission, allowing a steeple to exceed eighty feet in height. Discussion was held concerning the height of the proposed building and steeple, and James Miller, pastor of the church, explained that the building is projected to be 70 to 80 feet in height, with a tower about 25 feet higher. Dennis Hiatt, of the Del Camino area, stated that the Del Camino business people feel that the height of the steeple will not affect their businesses because the proposed location is back far enough from the highway; therefore, they would support a height not to exceed 100 feet for the steeple. He also recommended approval of the Use by Special Review. Douglas Hiatt, also of the Del Camino area, spoke concerning the ditch running through the property, and said no fence is required where the ditch runs past a mobile home park in the area. William Tillman, associate pastor of the church, assured the Board that a fence will be built along the ditch if it is deemed necessary. Commissioner Kirby moved to add, as Section d. of Condition 2, "Au agreement shall be established between the ditch company and the church in regard to the safety of the children." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yamaguchi and carried unanimously. (Tape Change (187-11) After further discussion, Commissioner Kirby moved to amend Development Standard #3 to provide that the steeple or other nonhabitable appurtenances shall not exceed 100 feet in height. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brantner and carried unanimously. Mr. Dell stated that the applicant had no problem with the Conditions and Development Standards as amended. Commissioner Page 2 CERTIFICATION - NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH Kirby moved to approve the Use by Special Review, subject to the amended Conditions and Development Standards. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brantner and carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 26th day of January, 1987. APPROVED: (��) A .{._ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: avA � AlAh 4.L Q WELD CO N C4LpRAD Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Cord . Lacy, an / By: bYI� 1 D putt' County Cle C.W. Kirby, Pro C.W. Kirby, Pro EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Gene R. Brantner EXCUSED DATE OF HEARING Jacquel Jo on . Frank Yamaguchi TAPE #87-10 & #87-11 DOCKET #87-1 PLO100 ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: JANUARY 21, 1987 DOCKET #86-83 - AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 11-2 OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS DOCKET #86-80 - FINAL PLAN - PFERD HIMMEL PUD DOCKET #87-2 - USR-DOG KENNEL (65 DOGS) HENRY J. & SUSAN J.K. BEECHER (T.J. KENNELS) DOCKET #87-1 - USR-CHURCH & SCHOOL, NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOC # (as listed above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING 'ijd �- ,—,;/'. A.,., /1 r 7./.%Gvflii:/ (/ �`.. (i(�. i 4.,C7!)ii.,a (f 2 le."rte ✓f.L.. LC/ . :11-t-it, 2.1%/,61.0 0 .x-1.2 -,PA6:-“i 0-c-/I.J>.c-u fi (1:-/,t,„,..:etti ,21., /ol1 II MM AY-( FZ -- 96 1,/-Jed. L. A:-75"G c-, wrS,v,vrt; �I(rw'Je-vim C Piv/�crf 77agif rt./ b J, ; ./ 6t_K �. uYfrlif'vie X75 % tO� rJ.�zl_T; (�. 4y� o 92 / &�✓a'c'' � liriy / '/ �s.r' "7a cc lh i tct,t.../C77----114-46..... -- ?q O ' G ri.,l ( ,4" ' 2 ,2.3 e 20 liJ Ni in c cf 7° ..>e ,,. , V te/f ,:� , . A 2-D 45 Ce -1 Lo Vuw QC %t 6 tS— \ C c c-,__The ' c - .. csL 1\O �/ \C C O Rt In Lc lli.); //l l7 // YYla,. /,), EXnd.. 11 Lunjw, •.I C. ., /OSo/ c7-1____— i INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number V. a% . :Se Submitted or Prepared Prior • to Hearin& At Hearing 1. Application SY/Pages J 2 _ C Application plat(s) / page(s) v/ ' 3. DPS Referral Sunmmary Sheet 4. DPS Recommendation • 5. . DPS Surrounding Propery Owner Mailing List 6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List L/ 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician 8. DPS Notice of Nearing 9. DPS Case Summary Sheet 10. . DPS Field Check // �1 4/12,10_," /� / 11. i legit- 414 r%` Side � ! ,/s/ ,re/ e// Ph/V t /_ 12. �Xen�?er 15teaI /0/U1 ewl-S //�Y/A&''✓c k?N 13. OM/ lo2*VC S�)lii/t�/�� i/llljPi �>'70in�caTt //` 044d 0-s 5 C tSe n &i C. feemy Dr,of 4- 14. ,9-4e Per QM,/ Dee. z Ilire Gym 4e uiirti/p F/ee �/bhcfps'i Q'S/e/Yf 6/y�/4r/ 2j 4/,'4,0„/ n, r#4,504/ls. memo • Ogled/2/� S-2- ,=c rarn 4/e.C le,wee, , D-f - A ly /hi/16(10 <� / 16. Pd /i s��Qr�' fJ��[v/// D!�/e�112 -2 ' /i/16(1 ei// / v 17.11 Ft r //Af✓ 2 shnts of Me fro/bsd Oheirc4 18. 19. 20. I hereby certify that the /el items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certi _that theseitems were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on /9 /V 19166... dee— rrent Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED APID SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS i9 - DAY OF ki;.Acc>liAA ti 19 j9 SEAL NO'RARY PUBLIC • PC MY COMMt4STOx EXPT. R / /5,/� EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET (.1 Case - Gtr otee n/ Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description Z4. L71, B. TirQii�r�rLr/Jr{T eola[erS„ �`fG2Cl c�v /�ecor� G� r �� ` c. � iri,7ccyr� L rivnu¢�c� t ; 401. D gJ% 7 ien/ -7, '` i i E. C!/�,PJiLd r/rat.. S&L V��.11/2.4" r G. v i H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Use by Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office can be contacted for a list of court reporters in the area. If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 87-1 New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church 737 Bross Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: January 21, 1987 TIME: 2:00 P.M. REQUEST: Use by Special Review - Church and school LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 2, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of I-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: January 5, 1987 PUBLISHED: January 8, 1987, in the Johnstown Breeze Arx/ti)3/7 E , HOME Interested party `desire the presence of a court reporter to AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Pursuant to the zoning laws of make a record of the proceed- the Stag of Colorado. and the eco in addition to th9 taped Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the hear�tItch wllro pa kapCduring a public nearing w18 be help in Boards 1p, CINk to the D/floe on eMtectad THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE the Chamber* of the Board of for a list of court reporter*in the County Commissioners Cwado, of area If regptar is STATE OF COLORADO 1 Centennial Center, 915 1 Office ffice eQ theories*to Me Board's. I SS Street, First Floor,GreeieY Colo- lo°shall he edWKQ M.yyiting redo, at the Bme specified. All Such'action at, Bra dey8 COUNTY OF WELD ) Perepns in any manner Intereatad er peQio0h° coue°rt eeetof 1, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I in e Use esttedd to Special 0 and Review are i'°bome by the req tinter... p°71rty1 am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; ' heard BE IT ALSO KNOWN he that the same is a weekly newspaper should. the applicant or any xt cos tpPss Planning d ym e printed, in whole or in part, and published in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Weld for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has 6'it been admitted to the United States mails as°Moe of eton second-class matter under the provisions of maY-•be examined In Ins the Act of March S, 1879, or any county the 0,_ttoad"°eoard or amendments thereof, and that said F1 wren, cis oh steence""teadl newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly Greasy, Colorado. Prue qualified for publishing legal notices and do re DOCKET NO. 871 advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. New creaBp LII tt T That the annexed legal notice or advertise- and Outre pach Queen ment was published in the regular and 37 B Longmont7col /0"°o e eet entire issue of every number of said weekly DATE: Jan newspaper for the period of .1... consecu- TIME: 2:00p M 21, 1987 live insertions; and that the first REQUEST: Use b publication of said notice was in the issue of cnurh9h ono echpo°ol'I Re. said newspaper dated f.- S.., A.D. !be?, LEGAL �9RIpTION: pert of and that the last publication of said notice t North p Pri 2 Townah)p was in the issue of said newspaper dated 8th P.M, Reflect" cl 88 almly. Colorado folorado A.D. 19 LOCATION:EaN In witness whereof I have hereunto set Road 24 no*h of Welarontaty my hand this ..X) day of ... rz......., County A.D. 1992 BOARD OF COUNTY WEMDT SCOUNRYS, tEUERSTEIN COLORADO 41 Publisher BY.• MARY ANN RECeOORTy D is tL lidERC AND rHE BOARD Subscribed and sworn to before me, a DATED: BY. Mary Reiff' Deputy Notary Public in and for the I.ounty of Janus y 5, 1987 (Veld, State of Colorad ��-h•is Q. day of PUBLISHED.Jenue l-4&' A.1). 19. 1.. the.Johnatowe Breeze, 1987, in _. Notary Public. My cfNn51+.1 47,11n, .exgtl;es. ...:....:.: h , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • State of Colorado County of Boulder I, J. R. Hofmann ,do solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a NOTICE dally newspaper Pursuant to the zoning laws of the Stateof Colo- printed, in whole or in part, and published in rado end the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and loth Street,First Floor,Greeley,Colorado,at the time specified.All persons In any manner Inter- Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and ested in the Use by Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard. uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months should the applicant or any interested party de- sire the presence of a court reporter to make a next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of record of the proceedings,in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing,the advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the Clerk to the Board's Office can be contacted for a list of court reporters In the area. It a court re- United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions porter is obtained,the Clerk to the Board's Office . shall be advised in writing of such action at least of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that ing a court reporter shall the be bone by the cost of engag- ing newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for ing party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text.and maps so publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning certified by the Weld County Planning Commis sion may be examined In the office of the Clerk to of the laws of the State of Colorado; that a copy of each number of the oWar of ld County County Commissitennial oners, located In gIn said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was Street,'Third Floor,Greeley,Coloraddo. APPLICANT published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the New Creation orld Outreach Ministries subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed 737 Bross Street Longmont?Colorado 80501 mode of business in this office. DOCKET NO.87I DATE: January 11,1987 TIME:2:00 P.M. REQUEST: Use by Special Review — Church That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published and school LEGAL in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; DESCRIPTION: Township art of the SPCA of Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Welu and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said County,1-25 Frontage LOCATION: East of ld County gRoad 24 and newspaper dated January 14 , 19 87 BOARD OF MISSIONERS UEL NCOUNTY Y,COLORADO BY:MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNAY CLERK AND RECORDER ND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff,Deputy DATED: January 5,1987 Published in the Daily Times Call, Longmont, f^/ Colo.Jan.14,1987 Ge era; $gem Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of January yy� ,19 87 ilY a ÷ cl? otary Public • . tomt. \ My Commission Expires October 6, 1983 FEE$26 • 50 717 - 4th Avcnuc 9 "eeuc,./ Longmont Colorado 83501 DATE: January .5 , 1987 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections , we have tentatively set the following hearings for the 21st day of January, 1987 , at 2: 00 P.M. Docket No. 87-1 - Henry J. and Susan M. Beecher - USR, Dog kennel (65 dogs) Docket No. 87-2 - New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church - USR, Church and school OFFICE OF THE CLE TO THE BOARD BY: ,77747,7_. Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COU TTY OL ADO ‘0.cirSo\ • N \•6\12LIC /7xai.3/7 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting December 16, 1986 Page 7 CASE NUMBER: USR-769:86:50 APPLICANT: New Creation Ministries and World Out Reach Church REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a church and school LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th p.m. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of the I-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24 APPEARANCE: Ken Dell, Planner, Rocky Mountain Consultants, represented the applicants. lie distributed floor plans of the proposed church building. A copy was retained as evidence by the staff. The school will not begin for at least two years and will be large enough to handle approximately six hundred students. They have reviewed the recommendations, conditions, and development standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff and they do not agree with Development Standard #3 complying with an eighty foot height requirement. While the main buildings will be below this standard, the steeple may be taller once the plans are completed. Keith Schuett stated the staff's feeling was that the eighty foot maximum height restriction would provide uniformity and be the same level as the signs in the area. Lee Morrison explained that what should be consider is what would be consistent for business type of buildings. This should not necessarily be an extension of a business-type of building because this is a church. Tape 262 - Side 1 AMENDMENT: Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard #3 be amended to read as follows: 3. No structure or portion of a structure shall exceed eighty (80) feet in height with the exception of the steeple or other nonhabitable appurtenances. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. exn/B/7 z Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting December 16, 1986 Page 8 The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Motion carried unanimously. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Dennis Hiatt, representing the Del Camino Area business, distributed an article on "Birth of a City," which entails the Del Camino Area. A copy was retained as evidence by the staff. Their group feels the church will be an asset to the area. It is his feeling the steeple should be taller than the signs in the area so it is known that there is a church in the vicinity. Bill Meier, Union Rural Electric Company, stated they are in favor of this request from a utility standpoint. They are interested in the building going on in this area because they are the supplier of the electrical services and service can be easily provided for in this area. Don Johnson, Saint Vrain Sanitation District, this building is important for the plans they have for this area. The Chairman asked the applicant if they had reviewed there Departmm ndations, of conditions, and development standards as o tliIIedave by he object D nment that Planning Services staff. They have and nonirhabitable appurtanences are allowed to exceed the eighty foot limit. The Chairman asked that reading of the recommendations, conditions, no nand td deveopment ith since there thisl request sanddthat they i bee filed wwith the summary as s a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION: Ann Garrison moved Case Number USA-769:86:50 Review Creatpermiion inistries and stries and World Out Reach Church for a Use by Special school be forwarded to the Board oroval based upon County ioners with the the recommendations ning and conditions recommendationutlid for app the Planning conditions as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff, the development standards as outlined by the bstay ff and m amended rs of by the Planning d Commission, and the testimony heLydia Dunbar. Commission. Motion seconded by The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting December 16, 1986 Page 9 Lee Morrison reported that since we are still under the old Comprehensive Plan this request must be evaluated by the Planning Commission under that plan. However, since were are between the old plan and adoption of the new plan, if this request is denied, the applicant may come back and oval ask that it 0nit be considered under the new Comprehensive Plan after its app requests made during this brief time between the two plans have this privilege. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members Go snell the Planning Commission for their decision. Lydia Dunbar - yes; Ivan Louis Rademacher - yes; Paulette Weaver - No, based upon the intent of the existing Comprehensive Plan which states that urban-type uses should be located adjacent to existing municipalities and this is not an existing municipality. Also, by locating something with this type oc adjacent to an interstate highway will create problems with the traffic on the interstate highway. Ann Garrison - yes; Jack Holman - yes. Motion carried with five voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. The Chairman called a recess at 4:40 p.m. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:50 p.m. CASE NUMBER: USR-770:86:51 APPLICANT: Aurora Capital Corporation REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a livestock confinement operation (2,400 head dairy) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SWi of Section 32, T4N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: At the northeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Roads 15 and 38 APPEARANCE: Ken Dell, Planner, Rocky Mountain Consultants, represented the applicants. This will be a commercial dairy on 161 acres. Aurora Capital wants this dairy to exceed all standards and State and County guidelines. This property is the old Anderson Feedlot. The house will remain on the property, but other structures and feedlot pens will be removed. The dairy is planned to be constructed in two phases. Each phase will have three mobile homes. Sanitation systems will be handled according to accepted design. Each phase of the dairy will have a cistern witch will be filled on Little r phase a wil to have lone water from two e hundred Thompson cows. He explained xplai�d District. Each how the sedimentation and retention ponds will be constructed and operated. Water from the third or last pond will be used to irrigate the property. All ponds will have clay liners to prevent water from seeping into the underground water table. There are four residences close to the dairy operation, but none is closer than six hundred and fifty feet from the dairy operation or the ponds. Impacts of the dairy are designed to be confined to the property. BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Ann Garrison that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the. We]cd County Planning Commission that the application for: 1'" CASE NUMBER: USR-769:86:50 DEC 191W NAME: New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church' ,',: ADDRESS: 737 Bross Street, Longmont, CC 80501 a .ZY. 00L0. REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for a church and school. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEi of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of I-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24. be recommended favorable to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone district. The proposal does not appear to have any adverse impacts on the agricultural interests of the County or the environment; - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review; - This proposal will be compatible with the existing and surrounding land-uses; - No overlay districts affect the site; and - Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. 474 m49/1 xn/D/1 g New Creation Ministries USR-769:86:50 Page 2 The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the Use by Special Review plat: - The plat shall be amended to show a road reservation for the realignment of the I-25 Frontage Road and evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the State Highway Department has approved the size and location of the Road reservation; - A copy of plans for Soil Erosion Control, Landscaping, and surface water runoff shall be approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District and submitted to the Department of Planning Services; - The plat shall be amended to show no access onto Weld County Road 24-1/2; and - The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special Review permit be adopted an placed on the Use by Special Review plat. 2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur, nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until: - The Use by Special Review plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services office and the plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder; - Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the Longmont Fire Protection District has reviewed and approved the working drawings for any building or portions of building planned for construction; An Off Site Road Improvements Agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County Road 24. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar. New Creation Ministries USR-769:86:50 Page 3 VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Lydia Dunbar Paulette Weaver Ivan Gosnell Louis Rademacher Ann Garrison Jack Holman The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 16, 1986, and recorded in Book No. X of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 17th day of December, 1986. > >.L.�. of z, 4 Bobbie Good Secretary DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 1. The Use by Special Review permit is for a church and a school as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. The applicant shall implement and maintain the soil Erosion Control, landscaping, and surface water runoff plan approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District. 3. No structure or portion of a structure shall exceed eighty (80) feet in height with the exception of the steeple. er - mther-nu,tAcabitalrlt... appurten ances. , 4. Prior to construction, the existing farm house and out buildings shall be removed and disposed of in an approved landfill. 5. The Use by Special Review site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. 6. The Use by Special Review facility shall not be used on any basis as a dwelling or as a temporary housing for any person. 7. The Use by Special Review area shall have three access, one from Weld County Road 24 and the other two from I-25 Frontage as shown on the Use by Special Review plat. An access permit from the state Highway Department shall be obtained prior to the construction and use for all accesses onto I-25 Frontage Road. 8. All Construction on the property shall be designed and built using the best techniques available to prevent radon gas from entering the structures and shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 9. The applicant shall comply with the supplementary district regulation requirement of Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 10. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 Page 2 12. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to insure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 13. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans or Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 14. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. w - , Date: December 15, 1986 CASE NUMBER: USR-769:86:50 NAME: New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church ADDRESS: 737 Bross Street, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for a church and school. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: East of I-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone district. The proposal does not appear to have any adverse impacts on the agricultural interests of the County or the environment; - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review; - This proposal will be compatible with the existing and surrounding land-uses; - No overlay districts affect the site; and - Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the Use by Special Review plat: New Creation Ministries USR-769:86:50 Page 2 - The plat shall be amended to show a road reservation for the realignment of the I-25 Frontage Road and evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the State Highway Department has approved the size and location of the Road reservation; - A copy of plans for Soil Erosion Control, Landscaping, and surface water runoff shall be approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District and submitted to the Department of Planning Services; - The plat shall be amended to show no access onto Weld County Road 24-1/2; and - The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special Review permit be adopted an placed on the Use by Special Review plat. 2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur, nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until: - The Use by Special Review plat has been delivered to the Department of Planning Services office and the plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder; - Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services that the Longmont Fire Protection District has reviewed and approved the working drawings for any building or portions of building planned for construction; - An Off Site Road Improvements Agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County Road 24. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 1. The Use by Special Review permit is for a church and a school as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. The applicant shall implement and maintain the soil Erosion Control, landscaping, and surface water runoff plan approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District. 2) No structure or portion of a structure shall exceed eighty (80) feet in � height. 4. Prior to construction, the existing farm house and out buildings shall be removed and disposed of in an approved landfill. 5. The Use by Special Review site shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. 6. The Use by Special Review facility shall not be used on any basis as a dwelling or as a temporary housing for any person. 7. The Use by Special Review area shall have three access, one from Weld County Road 24 and the other two from I-25 Frontage as shown on the Use by Special Review plat. An access permit from the state Highway Department shall be obtained prior to the construction and use for all accesses onto I-25 Frontage Road. 8. All Construction on the property shall be designed and built using the best techniques available to prevent radon gas from entering the structures and shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 9. The applicant shall comply with the supplementary district regulation requirement of Section 42.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 10. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 11. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 Page 2 12. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to insure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 13. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans or Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 14. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-769 DATE OF INSPECTION: December 6, 1986 NAME: New Creation and World Outreach Church REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Northeast corner of the intersection of 1-25 and Weld County Road 24 LAND USE: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Vacant land W I-25 ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S C-3 (Commercial) W C-3 (Commercial) and agricultural COMMENTS: The property has been in agricultural production this past year. There is an existing set of improvements located on the property. They are correctly shown on the Use by Special Review plate. Access to the property is from the I-25 Frontage Road which is a paved surface. There is an irrigation ditch which crosses the southern third of the property east to west. Weld County Road 24-1/2, located at the north end of the property, is gravel surfaced. Weld County Road 24 is a paved surface and is located at the southern end of the property. Drainage of the property would appear to be toward the north. By: \ Chuck Cunliffe, Director Department of Planning Se es �w,o .4 F a. _ z -...../ t � O� LONGS +r.. 4'?Je r .,Y. .-+e-.� „„w.e^r•. " S O Yr DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION * Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 776-6050, Extension 330 COLOR p'9O December 8, 1986 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: New Christian Ministries Church - Special Use Permit Dear Mr. Schuett: We have the following comments in regard to this application: 1) Our primary concern is the impact on the I-25/SH119 interchange as a major entrance into our community. We would like to ensure that any future intersection improvements will be accommodated. 2) We did not receive any information concerning certain aesthetic matters such as signage, landscaping, height or lighting. We are concerned about the aesthetic treatments of major entrances to Longmont. 3) The size and scale of this proposed church makes it an urban use. The Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.4 states, "Ensure that urban development with the St. Vrain Valley Planning Area is guided towards the City of Longmont in accordance with the goals and policies of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan." Although this is an urban level development, we understand the desire of Weld County to permit development in this area and appreciate the fact that this project constitutes growth near the Del Camino interchange rather than strip development along SH119. Thank you for the opportunity to comment upon this project. Sincerely, /•n Brian J. Miller, AICP Planner III BJM/gp (r "]I�J�F��,�� #2050-17 #2953 Il - '� I 1985 Weld Cu. olananw htimnoissim: , LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: December 8, 1986 CASE NUMBER: USR-769:86:50 NAME: New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church ADDRESS: 737 Bross Street Longmont, CO 80501 PECUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a church and school. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W§ SWj of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. ... ._::ION: East of I-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24. 7ZF OF PARCEL: 54.625 acres uSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: pa criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 of the .;.lc County Zoning Ordinance. cc .•nplication is requesting to obtain approval of a Use by Special Review it for a church and school on a 54.625 acre parcel of land that is - nated as a F-1 mineral deposit. (Floodplain deposit, coarse aggregates Lively clean and sound) . Enclosed is a copy of CRS 34-1-30 et seq. ... e Review Section 34-1-305. A copy of a nap showing that the location of .he proposed use is next to an existing Use by Special Review permit area :( 1 Lin open cut and and gravel operation. Tue Department of Planning Services staff has received specific recommendations from: - State Highway Department; - Longmont Soil Conservation District; - Weld County Health Department; - Longmont Fire Protection District; and - Sleld County Engineering Department dies of these referral responses are included in this land-use summay. Department of Planning Services has not received a referral response Amoco Production Company; - Longmont Planning Department; and - Colorado Geological Survey. / I" . u t DEPAR..� ,.NT OF PLANNING SERVICES ,Ci I PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 "1 3�$r 915 10th STREET Fri 1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 V, C • OLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on December 16, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Use by Special Review permit for a church and school from New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church the parcel of land is described as part of the W} SW} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 54.125 acres, more or less. The property is located east of 1-25 Frontage Road and north of Weld County Road 24. The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date cr presented at the public hearing on December 16, 1986. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Jack Holman, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Johnstown Breeze To be published one (1) time by December 5, 1986 Received by: .- Date: . .r; .-, 1i1 L "11 Cr,. .I,,,,W12 uomiss:r, p iii j • try. - .i• • - t I ."" p \ GR 'x = C 34 9� �p • 2 --�-- , �.. i �� .p _ Kt k -, 1 )�• � • i ' • --�0 6 32 v:vL-_ "••_ • _ ': I . /;I !-- � J 30 . ro.cru,ill W.[. tl> . .Ca. . - ..e., i.... ..z ' .. ,. i' • Cl • , • $ �... , , . \ a'0 . . • . - . • . e2 �. hy r i •�• x. • .i roster G .. z, • • :,•:41,621(r\(./pppppp��co o. G • • • (/ lj 28 c c X..�z . G �ry o (� �f v ID" id<a ouq bcvos� �� ,� .,-'ce 26 c r-rE aec .a ` r • 24 ` _ �1 y_ i d b •. < I ••{ 'MILLS r, - .. . o 0 o/ Rf c Jr : : _ • • 1 ��C c - �--Yi GO1p7P•i., - ' � C o e l - 5�., ' - h z. I'`u °/ i. y' . - I. P 11�.oE :. r ,d -i _,� - - - , ---o, •I /t/ • ilk „ .4:,..;•,/,- :� v •5; II i�••••',) ,. m • ,, i I/ ,> . _. • � — — 14 . ro.cz sx r .v�1c 'l�i 1 Gpd,,zl i - A .s' / It 0 1 , �j 14 z x . 4g0, a 'I y` ,.r 6 I,xl t .�ui:—Erin.. 1 ` ,G q54 w // K,�� • • j /� °a AC/RE :ccm �.� i �"`"� u� M ) ;j ms: `,. --L. r f 1 • . •p1 i ./ .y e ,� • •j = l 10 y i •Y 1f t C G �_C 1 p .r.•-..-.. • . . . _ . ' N, • •. �- h-cnJ a i c: 'U -. L /'L' •• ii i 7 •i �� / - - ir i i, 11 x, <x 3 . t •HH7t±-t ,. . % i v T9! j± 1 2 . . 3 .. _ A J B ASE . I , . L i (. t.. .1f• "j .c ..•% 2.. R 6B�V ' t rR 67W A D A M S - 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 1 ' 21 23 25 27 I o,.'. \i1 \Azit bone' / Reservoir 1 C / :7)7' i y'Res— .1a =_- f-- : 114943 C:�� 9B9) .4951' ��• I Yv ..,� ., � , off\ \ ' C_�� 4/asC ',-/ a$�p� ',- 1 3 34 \\____ThN. / ..) R • ..I 4gp M 4413 - ___ / �' nNcr� 1 Ho ..--- �� 4 ii 4 3 ' '< 2:'�'. V.,, 1 I 1. l / 1 3 1 I et5S , "1 q i '0 00404 I ' +• \ / is j 1 � �'w • �� ,o H \\„" ( a , -. RI nValle 1,.;.i' — G 'ange i � �_ 1 " • 7 '. • e �i 1 D!t g • �v i - 7'770 i m 1 I [Zinn n f 61 . 15 14 '� �. r + fir . ..... . .,,, c 1 LLL t s S• , i • ritlitar {, . _ • 7t,,ask . . tir5 .. (49.51.7) Y ♦ t w.v �;;. dt ;o , . b 1Y - s j 2 � . f ...j i � }'gip G•qi. . �+A t. a 'aRl r � „ 5 f, 4.,. _1 x ''S d ;3« - y, . •'�.4 --7-,,,,,?y x§''''` F *H 1..1 A ;lr / fir t 1 -41914 a « !!! } i. -;€4,9, J ) } as 1 J � g., t. h z-4x y..11 „W. . ' yim Y r yWs r 4 {' a MA .' <r sr zYY a.,..-_ `E« '' •e. � . �`a o-�'a. R ' ,�tatic.'* " .c,•�S .` '.te.' z `Y r, � 4 £ . s t � ' ,.4 •'�+jr3v • b,. x J t 41, #�, H^Q Y -... ',a e ,:t..•,1-_ -rta5 w�tit.. ?-12 5ti°';,f1-4 ,1z, -'° tb2 bt) .•)' yM `I.....h w •s 3-a L ' 31ts' "' "'u' n'. Cr --,,s. ?a -�'+ 4 '4 .,,r r .& � r - v, .� /n]��QQ 1 } d q1. tom• rt4 w f1Y �'f0 . !� z Lit.O.., 3 "�."Mr ,s — 1/4,4Z• ,fsqt,r':tn, _IS x . :at„,„n �¢�{ � ,‘-,- ', /4 prat rQ�'.' ` i5 y?it H , s'0(F_' _ r i�j1-1."-:,:O,44,71S:. > . ",te; ra 0t<krx} i' dt. •s,r..r, ate As - f..«> y.4 tr ! > -p. Y 3Y as 7 W4� � w.-_ :` -«. `-r'Fk' a `s%..+�FS 1 � l.. 1 _r•-•c•‘4,- le' , r 1y4• . .»r.r-ss " Y- ,R- .. f*�j T4 sst --- s .y, ,a, .• ' s'('- fi(rect. <t uX'.`a.= `r. `'YxW`3 i s .,/---.,.,-..,,ti �V x. s t�`d`�yr ' .e s sn.R ♦4 !ya 5 ts,� y i SS R: :S • 6. .. i a_ .... 44 'mil aar,- ` riat =ss,_ Geological Survey 34-1-301 116 117 to npioyees, see t § 24_ _ _ _ .�, io8 - '_ for its activities, the fees of the Colorado geologicala: l survey, when adjusted rI. t for the fiscal year next following that in which the supplemental appropriation ' - was made. shall be adjusted by an additional amount which is sufficient to I compensate for such supplemental appropriation. Funds appropriated to the Colorado geological survey in the general appropriation bill for the services ] f the general assembly specified in this section shall he designated as cash funds and shall not exceed III costs of a base staff '' the amount anticipated to be raised from fees collected pursuant to the : !� annuity of the survey S . section. ( i . ', 4riate charges for pre_ - 1304. § 1. ations: except that the Source: L. 53, p. entering into contracts i l geological and related PART 2 , t GEOLOGY 34-1-201. Definitions. As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise v cash fund - created, requires: 'd to enter into agree- _- (I) "Geologist" means a person engaged in the practice of geology . ries. and units of local (2) "Geology'' means the science which treats of the earth in general. l to direct costs of proyid- the earth's processes and its history : investigation of the earth's crust ans, t 30-28-136. C.R.S.. and the rocks and other materials which compose it: and the applied science ot 1- �,- ie r.0 this provision shall utilizing knowledge of the earths history processes. constituent rocks, r 1 a unit of local govern- erals, liquids asses. and other materials for the use of mankind. F zj or such other services (3) `Profession'algeologist— is a person who is a graduate of an in •tut�.m 74 Irs of higher education which is accredited by a regional or national accier t x o establish and collect agency, with a minimum of thirty semester (forty-five quarter) hour 41 III ether agencies of state undergraduate or graduate work in a field of geology and v. I. 0 postbaccalaureate training has been in the held of geology with a spe ::c It se. as part of its annual record of an Lidditional five years of geological experience to include no tuoic r fee which it is author- than two years of graduate work, ,, tts lit reral appropriation bill Source: L. 73. p. 610. 5 I: C.12 S. 1963. 5 51-3-1. .flit it of natural resources, °: that the revenue gener- 34-1.202. Reports containing geologic information. Any report required by. .h fees shall remain in I law or by rule and regulation. and prepared as a result of or based on a d applies. All fees col- I geologic study or on geologic data, or which contains information relearn; ansmitted to the state 1 to geology, as defined in section 34-1-201 (2), and which is to be presented arvey cash fund, which , - . to or is prepared for any state agency, political subdivision of the state. or geological survey cash recognized state or local board or commission, shall be prepared or approy en all not be deposited in .1 by a professional geologist, as defined in section 34-1-201 (3). ,ther fund. The moneys satiable for appropria- Source: L. 73, p. 610. § I: C.R.S. 1963, § 51-3-2. tl survey in the general fter. whenever moneys PART 3 kg the prior fiscal year of the appropriation to PRESERVATION OF COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS a car, and such amounts 34-1-301: Legislative declaration. (1) the general assembly hereby dech:r ado geological survey. that: rado geological survey 0.r �� a � a-y . .,t MM < L} !' t ,♦ ' ' d s' ,A' r ' al e 4^'" 6 ...-7:7-i';;1• 1/1;;'.07...'.' f a • .:1.i-c.4:. • 4 ` vy L I t r.*Sti n +.. +t:c4. ; t .}'�, t ti F '�;i Y -Af,bY-r .. 3. i wl � � s i s" k.,ref -,-..f1-.., a �f _tS.:444,,.4—,,FtS �' `� a . �'YT d„M' 1.4'141. .'mv. y'tiet . k41”` 917 A '�aW h r.. y+ .s a rr wr77 '., ,mr rt{0.4= z yin `xr'1Y g,,,,,, Mawr*• �.�k�m� rr ,F ..k `'. ` r N f ' t>�r. �r- x.r��-}r�«",�+w��t k ,,iefi �}v "ti ayes" r t-,-r .t~�'�< �y� r 4 *' 94•;1/247-1571, z t s s y $.v is Pt;t' * a l`b ',i. S ka' 1 �r '4 ti r,i t' ."` :? : -4C., 1 :x '' �"Y ' r x **e '��.,3 r�'�'vi„q`.°f�,K'��rE t .mot %` � `a_iSx r 4 i o+'; i 'i „ r . � ro aJY � }k�s}r`F��e��t.`a`4+%a$: i 3 � s .-I .H r -s ._Aa ._.... ii .w,.�+.₹ � - ;�"XR E �� 1 yn y...y.C .i• nn ii.i s .r 34-1-302 Mineral Resources 4 d7r��g rmv (a) The states commercial mineral deposits are essential to the ,t ate s - _ j economy. _ �1 F r (b) The populous counties of the state face a critical shortage it ,i;,h _ 4 rrs- 3 deposits. 5. . ls trio s .(c) Such deposits should be extracted according to a rational plan, e il u. 1 ti rated to avoid waste of such deposits and cause the least practicable ci rup '` t, tion of the ecology and quality of life of the citizens of the populous counties of the state. ' (2) The general assembly further declares that, for the reasons stated in `. �' r } subsection (I) of this section, the regulation of commercial mineral deposits,`-` 4 :9; r the preservation of access to and extraction of such deposits, and the deyef_ +" > >zg opment of a rational plan for extraction of such deposits are matters s of con 4 -v cern in the populous counties of the state. It is the intention of I �c1erd a ,w' ..i' assembly that the provisions of this part 3 have full force and enee : il h t rrt y,,ka' out such populous counties including, but not limited to. the cit. mr. ,:1 t r �_� of Denser and any other home rule city or town within each st , oni iii, s_ w� d' 111�1-�, ' county but shall have no application outside such populous LOU II. ., x. Y } -'tti", � Source: L. 73. p. 1046. § I; C.R.S. 1963. § 92-36-1. "' .ori t' r �yr:114.44151:1.121151- I43Law re,iews. For arnd "1974 Land Use .e?rn 7 x, L'cislation in Colorado 1,see`1 Den. L.J.467 T' '„4114.. �.1` v d r1V"4l, �$'� � �` AEA 31-1-302- Definitions. As used in this part 3, unless the conic .t it:en' ioc Cta� M : Yry r < � j � k- requires: --xx ., , . (1) "Commercial mineral deposit means a natural nui I ?.1 q i yetis { r` - - -.: � � t-. _ limestone used for construction purposes. coal, sand gray I ur ny ay '* � 4-' ms's ,^; a re_ate. for which extraction by an extractor is or 'sill t i ei a �Pror �' sP ' feasible <md ret_ardine which it can be demonstrated by geologic. I..,ner:do . c.lil i t+ '`,t• * a` l s l f or other scientific data that such deposit has signiticant aconom e o1 sn ae_ic r yg � vane to the area, state, or nation. kr ' 1. � a l �' (?) "Extractor" means any mdrvidual. partnership. assocr tL� n. or col p 1 x at { + -ea- :1- • i ration which extracts commercial mineral depovts for use � i L2 nu,rn;') 10. ~� 7, t -.4.f4,;.,y . • ( of selling such deposits or for use in another business owned by the extractor 1 �' �' ., ^ a or any department or division of federal. state, county. or mt:.i..1 : I nerfi- _ 1- �t� � 3 ment which extracts such deposits. � (3) "Populous county or populous counties of the state matins a y j rte lt .,," �, "", V9/:1 I l county or city and county having a population of sixty-five thousand ink-lain- -4;s f '•'ittk - s r t,i, .,,,,- 1 tants or more according to the latest federal decennial census. pp y +tom . ",44 t Source. L. 73. p_ 1047- § I; C.R.S. 1963. 5 92-36-2. Y^ r a� .at. t4s.; 31-1-303. Geological survey to make study. After July I 1 -h r `' ▪ `fri " 7 t r` at€ 4 rado geulo_lcal survey shall contract for a study of the eon _ y., , r i , w t. z, .. deposits in the populous counties of the state in order to idc a ,, , ; - - ""z, y, ♦.. ...;%4 d`: such deposits. Such study shall be of sand. gravel, and ri t• vr+ '' ` ' .�r', and shall be completed on or before Juts 1, 1974. and shat' - - or maps of the state showing such commercial mineral de �� ..:• 4:-.6.:(4,===.';;;;:i. 7rtilt., L4k ▪ i'.7-4. `i ' C • : -r ,v 1 Y L 1f. y, ~,,,:c„.....,..,-4,-/.4:,-...4t..., ''NA:e r Ci'y V. - a r M"1'iCee. 1`�'Yy`t.yr` _ x K. f S e • y 1 x u � : i � 134 4b't r A ..141 Y.` a--...:',..`v... ,�. r Ya n i w. - .r *,r • t r _ /-r t...-.qrr +'f'c 1 e �.r---y,... -y - 5 s ts^,„. . {,.1 _ 1 � �� t l O1: er w zx i 1f t , r y4 y (k . _ r • t. = Ty^��ikm7f z�s br 4#4`5.' ' Lk ! 'I U.w ,v < Y till', r v l� 1 1 } ,ar rKsju. r y as , iy � 15 c n' + - '" �� s°�SK.n 4�rYf`w . as'St' r abo"'13 n{ id'F fr'4h�: �6� .n' fTi #i1'y�f�: R '�x.,.y ,>1'�x. a '>.➢� ,.yiin:d �V..:: - .. z } �� ey' fi?'F '�s �iY`�+sfi Yk` ..,w. 'M, Z 0.v ... . Mkt '. •as.;:.'.....- � re. r'1 ter^S"fi t"� 'A7 �. ( e , . �: v '' .N a 34t-a hwt� .. 5t C r • .: 4 !" ..C� �t h i �� L " r� s§.¢� `Y/5�v q:e( n i.. Y + s1` 4^ }t .77 'y e f. �v'}Y, ..i_.$ f al t, a ' rcj...�! ' .. .. >.. .v.:ura.�. its cgs 118 119 Geological Survey 34-I-3 0 osits are essential to the states which in,LV he generally circulated. Any commercial mineral deposits disco'.- cred subsequent to July I, 1974, may be, upon discovery, included in such face a critical shortage of such scadv. !cording to a rational plan. eaten- Source: L.73, p. 1047. § I:'C.R.S- 1963, § 92-36-3. ause the least practicable disrup- citizens of the populous counties 34-1-304. Master plan for extraction. (I) The county planning co:nmis- sion for unincorporated areas and for cities and towns having no planning xs that, for the reasons stated in commission or the planning commission for each city and county. city. or- - of commercial mineral deposits, town, within each populous county of the state, shall, with the aid of the i of such deposits, and the devel- maps from the study conducted pursuant to section 34-1-303, conduct a studs such deposits are matters of con- of the commercial mineral deposits located within its jurisdiction and de',glop It is the intention of the general a master plan for the extraction of such deposits, which plan shall 'Desist aye full force and effect through- of text and maps. In developing the master plan, the planning con'--".sii.in ot limited to, the city and county shall consider. among others. the following factors: town within each such populous (a) Any system adopted by the Colorado geological survey gradic_ coax- such populous counties. mercia: mineral deposits according to such factors as magnitude f th_ deposit and time ot availability for and feasibility of extraction of a dep.:sit'. 9_-36-L (hi The potential for effective multiple-sequential use which would rests: in the optimum benefit to the landowner, neighboring residents. anti t;:L co:u- munity as a whole: (cl The development or preservation of land to enhance developnLcn: ai' physically attractive surroundings-compatible with the surrounding area: (d) The quality of life of the residents in and around areas which conga -t 3, unless the context otherwise commercial mineral deposits; (ei Other master plans of the county, city and county. city. or town. ns a natural mineral deposit of (ft Maximization of extraction of commercial mineral deposit.: coal, sand. gravel. and quarry (g) The ability to reclaim an area pursuant to the provisions of attio- actor is or will he commercially 32 of this title: and istrated by geologic. mineralogic. ih) The ability to-reclaim an area owned by any county. env and count_, . . significant economic or sir tecic I i eity. town. or other governmental authority or proposed. pursuant :o ,,i- adopted plan. to be used for public purposes by such a governmental autho' 3rtnership. association, or corpo- ity consistent with such proposed use. deposits for use in the business (2) A planning commission shall cooperate with the planning com.^.-tsio:s 1-business owned by the extractor of contiguous areas and the mined land reclamation board created by section ate, county, or municipal govern- 34-32-105 in conducting the study and developing the master plan for extrac- tion. unties of the state'' means any O) (a) A county planning commission shall certify its master ;on .on of sixty-five thousand inhabi- extraction to the hoard of county commissioners or the governing `rod'. .): decennial census. the city or town where the county planning commission is acting in liru r i a city or town planning commission. A planning commission in n). .. 9?_36.2. county. city, or town shall certify its master plan for extraction to the ing body of such city and county, city, or town. (b) After receiving the certification of such master plan and before..,: - Iv. After July L 1973, the Colo- tion of such plan. the hoard of county commissioners or governing ih.-d'. (.. study of the commercial mineral a cin and county. city. or town shall hold a public hearing thereof. .:' te in order to identify and locate least thirty days' notice of the time and place of such hearing 'It.i . _-J. gravel, and quarry aggregate. by one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the cote - i, 1974, and shall include a map i, and county. city, or town. Such notice shall state the place at v.high -' :_ rcial mineral deposits. copies of and maps so certified may be examined. ''.2.'''l.":"4"-• 'S•tl ).qr- i 1 t-114:k,ty '�: i it (y�.cx4x t '^�� t rtt ' a , 1 ;, K„w r .'a3�..M i rn ea �5'yf".ff,,,?.{F §'�}4C k :,'{ 3**,:".:i y, r • ,x' 'i. '''4'4t•'�X e 4r1: r1tT ti „ee's'L �43V"' ¢Nt4p1 ,6 1 a£yr i t z . 7 4,. t1ri -. i `1' ...T r..1, S i. •.. H at '. .- rrsr ri_¢t t t ; ( 2�, t e}. 2` « y J� S�ii�1�2..t:�� ,�. � �, << .-ia Sri: � � '`. < � "f%:,'1.-I-0 u sP^ a 1: 'mac--�' a- ,Nc i a•i r m.tv' G r{igicti a n t� a iva; '. " i'l`^^- y, t '• , ii, ,� " f" r F t'�mq ..,, • } r e' .�,q} ,,`.7,i(e5„' s +..t(.5rit•}t 4, sic rt iv Sit &M .a« - hEi4+tY'r.i: "t4,2`a .,,i). s.,„ ..;y�x.N sF- c .re4i'' .a4it r.i N. ,t`Y ...l' .� «.�s2,4vr..1 c_ p R fir', �� e % " -.. sv ::/-r k .y TS G.1L -e�tilc 'sq"'Y �` St 9r .,- y , f r r k .� .--.01,6i--:-.4 ,. t A:' r 1 Y,fa„G,p,R r' r i{ S y •✓ x�a��f'( �#1�wx 2—r 14v,,ta yr "-'a{- 4 ♦ +r.` f jx �t � ✓�` � , ♦ , 4� rY4+' *S 2»�M1�5n,',1) sr <t y } A `rs a�" n �Sl� Zt i . ° t . r t +t �'fRR;;.. f �..-„ � 4 t �r 4 y A s ,y t i Ac 1 �" 1 `"w Yt,�yi. ( 3xt'..t.--;.!:.t.:1''''.2:1". , try} r ; / tr• * & l u y� s ct '1 s '� �^5 f i$? _C'" { K f, e " x r i n> • ai. t x ,�y a x'81 < iz r• r { . x T x It • e. G Vii{ry aY 1 1 s 3t'1 i; ; la.. 7: >.n r ri!, xi C:Cri-tfM1 4 ''U:. , t -t.s y rW:l• t. ex r r ' :le' . ri , s.f'tf Y(^u,g ir)jt 1x' N'� Y, t , . ' ... . " ti ‘...!,',:.V.': .t4, a 34-1-305 yfineral Resources 12p . el x! k (4) The board of county commissioners or governing body of a city and ;< _ uni .a county, on or town may_.after such public hearing, adopt the plan, revise r e' �`'t „ ,. the plan with the advice of the planning commission and adopt it, or return ,, - t,,,,� , -v. I ; the plan to the planning commission for further study and rehearing before `,. 41 • ,,. S.y M1a r4,--fr �. r •`I i• adoption, but, in anycase. a master plan for extraction of commercial mineral 43 f i, t deposits shall be adopted for the unincorporated territory and any city and , county, city, or town in each populous county of the state on or before July ,( z/ P -. .. I i 1, 1975. f 4 .'- R.f?'. `ird 2 fn r rw k, hS to f s `" ( Source: L. 73, p. 1047, I: C.R.S. 1963. § 92-36-4: L. 75, p. 1336_ § 1, �';;t4 1 1 L. 77, p. 289, § 67. -Y;.1'. _a of ;. �:e“,ttra'q pr3f�-- , Cross reference: For esia'.h 'nment and functions of a county planning commission. compare i S I) Sin .4 $u as� � .� xppind n HP dIcoth c Board cn CI ✓� i ,u ,{ c x-r' Com-n n.ro:P. d , s Col..Wit..4 P?- I�311 uY.�� > " � V 34-1-305. Preservation of commercial mineral deposits for extraction. (I) Telt yT S�ro7 w f c y tip * ,-, ./.4, Ater July I, 19f3_ no board of county commisvoners, governing bod} of " �� , I any city and county, env, or town. or other governmental authority which r x� 9e 1 has control over zoning shall, by zoning, rezoning. granting a variance, or ..a-a44,2.11 .:7?-ceptt,- >y,,F,.xy‘ t other official action or inaction. permit the use of any area known to contain .a' �`" a� .. "- i «r a commercial mineral deposit in a manner vvhlch would interfere with the �1f. 'r ' present or future extraction of such deposit by an extractor. 'y.5 ,rh e t„;' tq,4, r ��.n,, .�, ..T.m 1.1) After adoption of a master plan for extraction for an area under its ,t,. jurisdiction, no board of county commissioners, governing body of any city • V- ,w I mta C 41. 4, t and county, cit . or town. or other governmental authority which has control , �`"" ' x i over zoning shall. by zoning. rezoning, granting a variance, or other official 4 3 ' p-.>i ' i action or inaction, permit the use of any area containing a commercial mineral k `S 4,4 f deposit in a manner which would interfere with the present or future extrac ' ; ,__r lion of such deposit by an extractor. > x � c (3) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a board of county y I. gk ' 4 - " commissioners. a governing body of any city and county, city, or town or t a4 �9'r -gyp 1 any other governmental authority which has control over zoning from zoning i .. N ' ` 4' _ or rezoning land to permit a certain use, if said use does not permit erection j At ,, ` z I� -Y. of permanent structures upon. or otherwise permanently preclude the extrac Sri. `� w �t tion of commercial mineral deposits by an extractor from. I and subject to �. t „, Pre.., x t said use. ' n r6 '`<"z `�. ;„ • i (4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to piohibit a board of county 1. f�s, fg1 � ,�,�s �*�" commissioners, a gocernmg body of any city and county, city, of town or `gfor pt= *'` `i'-'�14 '" I other governmental authority which has control over zoning from zoning ''.',..i. vxx>r.'xs"�' w y. ` agricultural use, only. Lind not otherwise zoned on July I, 1973. i '4 f 4144u k. "r (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a use of zone'' i " 1+s 3Y si k, , v „ #, , r sa s r land permissible under the zoning governing such land on July I, 1975. x . 'x T "� > "i"`_• (6) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a board of count> 4„,-;_ ` '` ' `V'''It t commissioners, a governing body of any city and county, city, or town. of it,--,, e- a* ate o` f : ' any other governmental authority from acquiring property known to contain '��'Fy .`c�''� ': a commercial mineral deposit and using said property' for a public purpose. q ..r;j44:4"4: & - ,, s hM1rt.tr •I "Alta; . -ix., �a t 1 r‘ } F tiK 7 M1 .i i. ,. n :`ar rr T li1 5 e4fv`Sr.�i<tt-izr s/A.s .J.,....74.•i vat_I a E ,t P ..,6,�,gg.' i. 'YX4S -u ,:,...,,,r,21-Lt:4t .', ;',, T ' ,,-.4,,,,,,.. ,..-:-.0-4t'i 24j8 ai , 63 a e at .,t i t '-Z s `.^ :',,�N't5• k lax-., pa1 r�JSay t�f A s.= 4..e,3�?,A'r ..°F ,�].,..}J sr w^M" +ice..^?' "°cPc' $ r<•` 4.44. Y x, t' ° !° w it.t...7::::Te.S-rit.r/t7T:l.',f;ce?1,...7:rtl.-et"'i T'Y S a --�Tp .. 'r'sj,(r i t�.WL4.�.-t''.�LY�'-1 �f te+ N1 Y M✓ .. R 1 5 h t.s : IV. -..,;^ Q Y`r`.{ :ii 120I,I C ol,_nado Joint Res mew Process 3'1-10-10 .tins body of a oily and except that such use shall not rcrmit erection of permanent structures which adopt the plan, revise would precTuck permanentlythe extraction of commercial mineial deposits 1 and adopt it, or return 444 c and rehearing before Source: 1.. 73. p.'1048. § I:C.R.S. 1%3, § 92-36-5; L..75, p. 1336. § 2. e of commercial mineral itory and any city and state on or before July Law reviews. I or article Sccc'ed V.nerals incompatible with mining such as ei 'c.mc 1 11 as a Deterrent la Land Develn m oft see 51 permanent structures on does not requirt IS t local d: the eprxnn -- f Den.L.J. 111974 vatton i_Local governments can permit uses cnmpati- to allow mining many area where it is comfier- '1 I hie with mining By zoning, retor mg. granting dally practicable. but outs to preserve access 4: L. 75, p. 1336, § I; a variance. or other action or r.action. local to the mineral deposits. C S 'd Sand R C r covet t. gos ernments tan permit me ase of land v- Board of County Comm rs. 673 P. d 1013V ti . nown to contain a comm ICoio.Ct.App.ul vial mineral 19831. +eposit so toff as the permits d use is not Inning commission. compose Ci JOINT REVIEW PROCESS ipf i 1 :1RTICLL 10 ,I il.: asits for extraction. (I 1 �; ers. governing body of I�I i- rental authority which Colorado Joint 12estew Process -II granting a variance. or 10 103. Dunes of the Colo ra I, Iou'�1 I, 10-101. 1 eetslatte d I..ratton. sties o others. 'I, area known to contain s4-10-101 Colorado joint r c lea'process. ould interfere with the sa 10-104. Legislam e resew- i r !COT. It 1 for an area under its 1 34-10-101. Legislative declaration. 'fhe general assembly herehy I..... - - •rning body of any city determines, and declares that continued beneficial development of its tinat it 4 oritc which has control resources is important to the state of Colorado: that the many govern oral _a. :lance. or other official permits and licenses to be obtained by ❑ natural resources developer can (0 fig a commercial mineral cause confusion and delay; that the jurisdictional integrity of each unit and resent or future extrac- agency I of local, state. and federal government must be maintained: and that h' an agency of state government the function of which would be to coordinate hhibit a board of county relations between developers of natural resources and units and agencies of write, city. town, or local, state, and federal governments would make the permitting process N,i ver zoning from zoning more efficient and. therefore. offer a benefit to the people of Colorado. The i ocs not permit erection general assembly further declares that the Colorado joint review process. e I e- tly preclude the extrac- ated by this article, shall be the proper agency of state government to umle:- - from, land subject to take the coordination function. so that problems arising in the preproduction stages of natural resources development projects can be expeditiously resolved. )hibit a board of county ,unq, city. or town, or Source L. 83, p. 1306, § 1. zoning from zoning for I. 1973. prohibit a use of zoned 34-10-102. Colorado joint review process. (I) There is hereby cre- tc.i. on July I. 1973. the office of the executive director of the department of natural re5tnn.-,'-. an agency to be known as the Colorado joint review process. phibit a board of county ., . 'urns'. city, or town. or . (21 The Colorado joint review process created by this section shad cise its powers and perform its duties and functions specified in this cr I. pert' known to contain under the department of natural resources and the executive director there: I y for a public purpose; as if the same were transferred to the department by a type 2 tramlr. r1 I n �y. J 'Eir '4' br0 _firYs,t..a�Y •tw.a+tF+'r `y, 4,d• '.zyy 17(Vvspgx l . � 1,Aity i *1`.+ �-., ,,, i }.g.tt fr'rs > �.v�' F ! t.1 s iv , 67[.i'} ,. a> �� 9 n i r} cd" t5 C s t, *t c a°� 'A ' 1 p°w.'tis""; �^'!iitk„ lx k '� s Qx w�erta trx �rt ��+y^.,,.A* s Fs., 7�FV11:1 � - 4 t a F w i iA . Q* A�'n9::.et �AEi4Vf r1`ietzgs?,i. �""%ti` 8Aent yirirI N as.. J US - 489 ri§,, v �� 7/ // �. 1 � M / 827 II/ i/ gce r i. SI/=c isr SUP 441 SUP- G00e'-el. I17/NING / IVFI.D Co0 ivr/ a- j/ c4-AID M6-R411-1-; ee c AA 92/9-170N/ a' /de/ '''' ' / Ay / 7j'///Xff/�/%///ix-7,0/.7 / T .7__ � j 4832 s //J// / // ///�/��//�//� �/.� , 7/4, i . , 483 • 1/// ///%///'�T////i% i 4834 F 9 US 636 CHLIFCA MD / d` 63 P S/&SR/ST C'^. tiS7 eUO 7 \, \\, \ . OP&V-Cer %.,*744,0 eibileg40 ' , " .cam; i ./ „A: \,\ ; Z 13 l'., / - h C- 7 x . 6 • '<ff7/0//%L//////`/////7,7/7/47//7/V47//!////7/U/////✓,/N/�,.+d REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: New Creation Ministries CASE NUMBER: USR-769:86:50 and World Outreach Church SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 4, 1986 KO/ SR NR NO SR NR V / X County Attorney ✓ [COI2 &4PE Vega V X "Weld County Health Dept. 1315"i w,e..e /s / �/ LCN&D7ONt CO. core/ X Engineering Department / X County Extension Agent / X Amoco Production Company P.O. Box 40 V DuPont, CO 80024-0040 X ate Highway Department 1420 2nd Street Greeley, CO 80631 X Office of Planning and Development Civic Center Complex Longmont, CO 80501 / X vongmont Fire Protection Attention: Fire Marshal William Emerson 9119 County Line Road Longmont, CO 80501 / X friOngmort Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road Box D Longmont, CO 80501 X Colorado Geological Survey Attention: Louis Ladwick 1313 Sherman Street Room 715 7 Denver, CO 80203 X �ld County Sheriff's Office Attention: Rick Dili NO=No Objection SR=Specific Recommendations NR=No Response 4 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS �F Nt Op N P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado-80632-0850 h' "�M' ^ (303) 353-1232"s ^J oa°vco December 1, 1986 Weld Co. , I-25 Kahn/Waterford Minor Sub. and New Creation Ministries Special Revie NE Cor. I-25 and SH 119 Mr. Keith Schuett Department of Planning Services DOH File x+5100 Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: We have reviewed the Kahn/Waterford Minor Subdivision (Case # S-272:86:17) and the New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church Special Review application (Case # USR-769:86:50) . The following comments apply to both of these cases and are a continuation of our previous comments on the sketch plan and amended recorded exemption. Our previous comments have addressed several major issues, including the following: future re-alignment of the Interstate 25 east frontage road, access to the frontage road, noise setbacks from I-25, and control of surface runoff. The minor subdivision and special review applications have adequately addressed the noise setback and drainage concerns; however, we have additional comments on the frontage road re-alignment and access. The frontage road re-alignment is an important element of the future modification of the I-25/State Highway 119 interchange. As noted in the subdivision application, the need for interchange reconstruction is projected to occur during the period 1991-1995 in the North Front Range Corridor Study (NFRCS) . However, there are currently no funds in our Five-Year Construction Plan for this project, and it cannot be assumed that interchange reconstruction will occur before the church-school facility reaches capacity. As indicated in our letter on the amended recorded exemption, it is important that the right of way for this frontage road re-alignment be identified on the plans for the development of this property. The design and right of way details of this re-alignment must be known to ensure compatibility with the church plan. Another important aspect of this re-alignment plan is the potential effect on funding for the overall interchange reconstruction. The State Highway Commission is increasingly looking to local governments for support via their land use authority to facilitate KEITH SCHUETT December 1, 1986 Page Two state highway projects. We appreciate the consideration which has been given by this development and the Grant Brothers property south of County Road 24 to a combined intersection for this frontage road relocation. However, the provision of the necessary right of way through reservation or, preferably, dedication will improve the chances for funding of a state interchange reconstruction project at this location. The estimated cost for reconstruction of the S.H. 119 interchange is $5,780,000 in 1985 constant dollars according to the NFRCS. The information provided on the traffic impact of the church- school facility indicates that there will be high peak hour volumes and substantial daily traffic when this facility becomes fully utilized. This level of activity will accentuate the need for improved capacity at the interchange and may affect the design of the accesses to the frontage road. The November 20, 1986, letter from Ken Dell to you regarding the Kahn Subdivision correctly states that access to the existing or future frontage road will require an Access Permit. Application for this permit is made to this office. Due to the high projected traffic volumes, it is likely that turn lanes at the accesses will be required. The applicant is responsible for providing us with the traffic information from which to determine the need for turn lanes. The proposed access locations on the church-school plan are acceptable, but it is also important to show future accesses to the relocated frontage road to determine their acceptability. Thank you for the opportunity to review these referrals. Please contact Wally Jacobson if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ALBERT CHOTVACS DISTRICT ENGINE John K. Crier 'District Planning/Environmental Manager JKC:mbc(WJ) cc: D. Yost Area Foreman File: Crier-Jacobson via Chotvacs 3��s ( DEPAR ; .,iENT OF PLANNING SERVICES•( ��r PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 pi+.. 915 10th STREET >. R GREELEY,COLORADO 60631 -------_ IA e` COLORADO CASE NUMBER USR-769:86:50 November 21, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church for a Use by Special Review tor a church and school. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is east of 1-25 Frontage Road and r.crth of Weld County Road 24. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 4, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our . interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will he submitted prior to • 3. X Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: .;;.; r�1i s • L1ev,vCC 4- 6J L Agency: Longmont Soil Date: December 1, 1986 / 'u4 Conservation District VA247c ET„;;; , -..,-- _ _ e?th A. Sc uett 1.: G; r:2; 1.,.1 i'c,i l i l`'?� Current Planner r% 1986 PIT "9. Plnnnin¢ t:nmmnssioo a Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box 0 - Longmont, Colorado 80501 December 1, 1986 Mr. Keith A. Schuett, Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Cast USR-769:86:50 - New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Dear Keith: In reviewing the storm water calculations for this proposed development, it has been discovered that a soil type has been misread from the soil survey map. This will result in a hydrologic group of D rather than B for the 44.2 acres incorrectly read as Altvan soil. This will result in calculations for both historic flows and developed flows to increase. However, the volume of storage required should remain as calculated since it is adequate to keep developed runoff at historical rates. We have concern over the outlet of the storage pond and would like erosion control at the outlet of the structure to be specified. Do adjacent landowners know that a concentrated flow of water will be outletted onto their property? What flooding problems will be created as a result of bringing runoff water to a concentrated point of delivery? Also, the drainage from the entrance driveway is shown to dump into the Rural Ditch. Will drop structures or other suitable measures be installed to prevent erosion of the ditch banks and/or damage to the ditch crossing structure? Any work done in or around the Rural Ditch should be met with their approval. Erosion control during construction and after has not been adequately addressed and should relate to critical wind erosion periods and proper time of seeding. Approximately 53 acres of this site has soil with a water table within one-half to one and one-half feet from the surface. This soil has severe limitations for use for buildings with shallow excavations due to the high water table and frequent flooding. Parking areas have severe limita- tions on this soil type due to the high water table, flooding, and frost action. Again, the misreading of the soil mapping unit may have lead the developers to believe this soil is suitable when in fact it is not. The CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT Page 2 December 1, 1986 Mr. Luther Stromquist correct soil mapping unit north of Rural Ditch is #3 Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum (not #2 Altvan) . The above comments merit your follow-up to avoid costly mistakes. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this Use by Special Review. Sincerely, IZ1fFlez tnLQA Luther Stromquist President LS:rah stotr cavil. ) mErnoRAnDum !lige To Weld Count Plannin 1 December 3, 1986 COLORADO From Health Protection Servic Subject: Case Number: USR-769:86:50 Name: New Creation Ministries & World Outreach Church Health Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. It is our understanding, from conversations with Milton L. Kahn that: a. The existing old house will be torn down. b. The proposed church & facility shall be served by the St. Vraln Sanitation District. By direction of Ralph R. Wooley, M.D. , Director, Weld County Health Department �l1rTl Ir - - 19ro II i - ice We16 CO:,Bianame-11I;;n'Oiss;oi • _ ,!, f EmoRAf1DU To Weld County Planning �e November 26, 1986 0 � COLORADO From Health Protection Services New Christian Ministries Church Special Use Permit Subject: Due to shallow ground water 2-3 feet below existing grade. It is definitely unsuitable for conventional septage disposal. Further subsoil investigation will be required to determine percolation rates for an engineered lined evapotranspiration septage disposal system, until St. Vrain Disposal is available. \')/ r� I 1995 • 1 • .� DEPRI IvIENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 .:)'-4' T,,,E .A. ,1 Y. PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 kow,1O :ei ., �q# a IV 1986 � .: ' t L r ,.,E ClIcTi4;CY � LOUGgi tiT CO. • COLORADO CASE NUMBER USR-769:86:50 November 21, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Church for a Use by Special Review for a church and school. The parcel of land is described as part of the SW} of Section 2, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is east of I-25 Frontage Road and ncrth of Weld County Road 24. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this reeuest would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the -processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within fourteen (14) days of mailing from our office, it may be interpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within the fourteen (14) days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 4, 1986, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will he submitted prior to 3. XXX Please refer to the enclosed letter. SigneddLte�,L-M-. c-mt�Z Z Agency: Lonomont Fire Date:02 December 1986 William R. Emerson Protection District Fire Marshal yy,,/ III .I : --dri ,•7-LM ij J 11 .eith A. Scnuett 17 412i f1/ t , lann 1 Current Planner i I J_O I !"E!1 C3. Phmmlik L IIIIISSICI1 y oNOMOyt LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT " o.' 4a 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 \ 464 O� David Bierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec,Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Nuss Fire Chief Director Director Director Director Director 02 December 1986 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Ref: Case NumberuSR-769:86:50 We have reviewed the proposal and do not have objections to the development. However the development shall be in compliance with and subject to requirements of the Longmont Fire Protection District and the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code. We also require one complete set of working drawings for any building or portions of buildings planned for construction within said development. Should you have any questions please contact this office. Sincerely, .1-Q_te-.-.- r--rr7-s William R. Emerson Fire Marshal WRE/w re Copies: Board of Directors (5) • Chief Secretary/Attorney New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Center Church r; i + a-,; s � L\,, I li *II�I' n 'ii�l� r, . PlanninlL iamr�lssi;;u Asci(Avgics filErilORAIIDUM Keith A. Schuett Wily. To Current) Planner Date December 2, 1986 COLORADO From Donald R. Carroll , Administrative Manager - Engineering Department Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn - Waterford Ranch Company Subject: S-272:86:17 1. We are aware that Rocky Mountain Consultants are workinc with the owners of the three parcels east of I-25 on Weld County Road 24. We would like one traffic and master plan from I-25 to the end of the New Creation Ministries property. We also feel that this should be the same on the cross section (curb and gutter, widened right-of-way, turn lanes , etc. ) as SH 119 on the opposite side of I-25. 2. We recommend denial of the access to Weld County Road 241/2. A previous road maintenance agreement with Siegrist allows mining both sides of Weld County Road 24% and access to the frontage road. We see no reason why church patrons need access beyond the I-25 frontage and Weld County Road 24. If the access is granted to Weld County Road 24% the owner would be responsible for improvements including realignment, paving and shoulders to meet Weld County standards to accommodate the increase in traffic. This work must be coordinated with the Siegrist agreement. _ ' DRC/bf xc: Commissioner Gordon Lacy Y Y (...„-------- EL- yri , GHE ELEY, COLO:1-..4DJ ; • COLORADO • July 27, 1954 Nelson En;ineers 520 Greeley National Plaza Greeley, Colcrad: 32631 Attention: Mr. Fern Nelson RE : Siecrist Road .,aintenance Agreement Dear Mr. Nelson: We have received Your edited agreement and have the foilow'inc objections : 1 . .`.eo_ulremen- to post the desiona ted haul route at the has beer. delete'. pit exi t 2. Inc restriction on traffic to the east on Road 24% has been deleted. 3. The straiohtening of Road 241/2 has been deleted. Since the structures which now prohibit this straiantenin❑ will be removed and since -- ierist rf'l be mining bMch-'sidds o tfiis rba 'this request seem: oo , 4 . Inc detailed description of what improvements to Road 241 will be expected has been del eted. 5 . The improvements to Road 241/2 will be required if an exit from the pit is used at any time, recardless of any future change in exit location to the I-25 frontage road. The use of the word "re place" in ite-; :3 leaves some doubt. 6 . The agreement must be signed by an officer of Siegrist Construction unless proper power of attorney is attached. - - Snouulc •roc have any Questions or co:nT:ents , phase cer.tac_ us . Sincerely, Rocney H. Hutchinson P. E. Enci Manager xc: Rod Allison, Planning Department Fes' "=i a -- r LG 3%.J.. F:1 +j av COLORADO Ser.ter.ther E, 193 Siecrist Construction Co , _?99 York Street DPnvPr, CO C22 Attention: Mr. Lea' S . =tensor, ., ar Mr. Henson. . Enclosed nerev:it- is t.._ sully exec'nec nd Road Val a i-.croverrents b..=_reement your ravel pit U.S.R. - _H. if you have any cues:Ions or comments , G; eaSe conta zt l.- . Sincerely, i / / ri-X42«� J Rodney H. Hutchinson P. E . Enoineerinc Manager .--'L: cc: -Nelson Encineers , Mr . Layer. ',elscr. P . - . Piannin=_ Depart e.nt, µr . F.cc A.. . .sor. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS New Creation and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 Saint Vrain Land Company 6999 York Street Denver, CO 80229 Milton L. and Edwin S. Kahn 6750 East Eastman Avenue Denver, CO 80224 Waterford Ranch Company 2323 South Troy Street, #113 Aurora, CO 80014 Stener J. and Francis E. Carlson 4111 Glade Road Loveland, CO 80537 Clarence J. and Vivian P. Evers 1203 Princeton Court Longmont, CO 80501 Ronald L. and Darleue F. Fahrenholtz 1119 Windslow Circle Longmont, CO 80501 Cheveron U.S.A, Incorporated Property Tax Section P.O. Box 7611 San Francisco, CA 94120 Burger Avenue Investments, Limited 125 South Bowes, Fifth Floor Fort Collins, CO 80521 Grant Brother P.O. Box 948 Longmont, CO 80501 SURROUNDING MINERAL OWNERS New Creation and World Outreach Church USR-769:86:50 Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn c/o Foster Mortgage Company 1873 South Bellaire Street, Suite 200 Denve,r CO 80222 Amoco Production Company P.O. BOX 40 Dupont, CO 80024-0040 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone — 356-4000 — Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee Receipt Number Recording Fee Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: SW 1/4 Section 2 T 2 N, R 68 W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: Section T N, R W Property Address (if available) PRESENT ZONE A Agriculture _ OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE 54.625 Ac. PROPOSED LAND USE Church & School EXISTING LAND USE Crop production SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn Address: 1873 S. Bellaire St. #200 City Denver zip 80222 Home Telephone # Business Telephone # 691-5600 Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Center Church Address: 737 Bross Street City Longmont Zip 80501 Home Telephone # Business Telephone # 776-4225 List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: See Attached Address: City Zip Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Pastor I. Miller, President Subscribed and sworn to before me this /7 day of i'14-0-6Y 4A-e- 19efitt2 CI. .o-t-/C NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires 62- 2-g-`rf NEW CREATION MINISTRIES CHURCH USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PROPOSED USE This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed church-school building on a 54-acre site. The property is located at the northeast quadrant of the I-25, Highway 119 intersection. The proposed building will contain a worship sanctuary and related support faci- lities, offices for the church staff, class rooms for elementary level education and a gymnasium. This building is designed to accommodate growth in the congre- gation and is planned to meet the long range needs of the church. The sanctuary is designed to seat approximatley 3,600 including a balcony and choir area. The class rooms can accommodate 600 students at full enrollment. There are now approximately 1,800 persons in the church congregation. The average Sunday attendance is about 70% of membership. The school classes will not begin for at least two years fallowing opening of the building. When feasible, the school will begin with 3 grade levels. Additional grade levels will be added as needed. Full enrollment of the school facility will take many years. Analysis of a similar church-school showed that after 12 years it had a student enrollment of 350. We anticipate a similar evolution. The classrooms will be used for Sunday school and meeting rooms until the school is begun. In addition to Sunday worship services, additional church activities are held on Wednesday evenings. These activities attract about 50% of the Sunday atten- dance. -1- The church's present facilities are inadequate to serve the present membership and there is no room to expand at their present location. The church has found it necessary to find a new location large enough for a new building, adequate parking and outdoor recreation activities. This site meets these needs and has excellent access. Transportation Access to the church facility is planned from County Road 24, The I-25 frontage road and County Road 241/2, The State Highway Department plans to relocate the frontage road to allow spacing between the frontage road and the I-25 ramps for traffic control signals. The site plan for the church-school building and related parking is designed to accommodate relocation of the frontage road to State Highway Department standards. When the frontage road is relocated, church access to County Road 24 will be removed and relocated to the frontage road. Peak traffic volumes will occur on Sunday and Wednesday. Initially, traffic generated by the church use is estimated at 850 vehicles per day on Sunday and 490 vehicles per day on Wednesday. When the church and school facilities are at capacity, the traffic generated is estimated at 2,680 vehicle trips per day on Sunday and 2,040 vehicle trips per day on Wednesday. The Wednesday projection includes the school use and Wednesday evenings church activities. On weekdays the school use at capacity is projected to generate 730 vehicle trips per day. The recently completed North Front Range Corridor Study prepared for the Colorado Department of Highways projects modification of the I-25/Highway 119 interchange in the 1991 - 1995 time frame. This modification will occur before the church-school facility reaches capacity. -2- Surrounding Land Uses and Potential Uses Uses on properties adjacent to this site are agricultural crop production and pasture uses . The Del Camino commercial and residential area is west of this site across I-25. There is an existing residence on the north side of County Road 241/2 approximately 350 feet from this property. There is potential for additional development in this area. Ten acres adjacent to the southwest corner of this property is zoned C3 Commercial District. This Commercial District extends adjacent to I-25 south of County Road 24 approxima- tely one mile to County Road 22. There is also additional commercial zoning in the Del Camino area which is not developed. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities Water service is planned from Central Weld County Water District. Service to this property will require a main line extension along County Road 24. The church is working with the District to have this line installed in 1987. This property is in the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The District Board of Directors has issued a preliminary committment to serve this property. The Sanitation District plans to install treatment facilities and trunk mains in 1987 and will be prepared to serve this site in the latter part of 1987. Fire Protection This property is within the Longmont Fire Protection District area and will be served by the Central Fire Station at 9119 County Line Road and the Mead Fire Stati on. The church-school building is designed with an internal sprinkler system. Also, fire hydrants will be located at strategic points for effective fire control . -3- Storm Water Detention Storm water detention will be provided in ponding areas on site. These areas will be sized and designed to detain storm water and release it at historic runoff rates. Schedule Construction of the proposed building is planned in 1987. A December occupancy is projected. Erosion Control Site surface areas disturbed during construction will be seeded and maintained to avoid erosion problems. Soils 3 - Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum Soils classification information as per the Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part. Prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Comprehensive Plan The proposed church site in the Del Camino land use activity area is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Del Camino area is developed with substantial commercial land use and residential uses. Recent approval of the St. Vrain Sanitation District provides this area with sanitary sewer service. Adding this service will assure the full range of utility services at this acti- vity area. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan discourages scattered development in rural areas and encourages new development to locate near population centers. The stated reasons for this are: -4- r ' a. These areas have a base for extending facilities and services and the cost of these extensions is less likely to be passed on to the taxpayers. b. It discourages the break up of large blocks of agricultural land which are necessary to viable farm operations. Del Camino is a node of urban land uses and is, comparatively speaking, a popu- lation center in this part of Weld County. Applying the above listed Comprehensive Plan principles to the church request: a. Services and facilites 1. The Sanitation District plans to install treatment facilities and collection mains in 1987. The church will help defray a portion of the cost of these installations reducing the initial impact on the taxpayers in the District. The church will pay monthly service charges which will help pay operation and amortization costs of the District. The church use will help reduce costs to taxpayers in the Sanitation District. 2. Water service is planned from Central Weld County Water District. In order to serve this site, it is necessary to extend a main line in County Road 24. The majority of this line extension cost will be carried by the church and other users along County Road 24. No other facility improvements or enlargements are necessary. The church and other users on this line will pay monthly service charges which will help pay amortization and operation costs of the District. This main extension will utilize existing District capa- city and help reduce costs to the taxpayers in the District. -5- 3. Telephone, electric and gas service extensions are paid by the users and do not add to taxpayers expense. 4. The church use will not add to the cost of educational , fire or police protection services. b. Agriculture Uses 1. This property is part of an original 64-acre parcel which has been divided into 3 parcels. The original property has been leased out for farming by others. This property is not a viable farm operati on. The proposed church use of this property is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Zone District This property is zoned A, Agricultural District. The intent of this zone is to provide areas for the conduct of agriculture and agricultural related uses. Some uses related to agriculture are more intense and have greater impacts than agriculture. The church-school use falls into this category. These uses must receive approval through a Special Review Process . This process is intended to ensure these more intense uses are designed and operated in a manner which is compatible to existing and planned uses in the area. The site design for the church-school use is guided by several design parame- ters dictated by this site and its surroundings. 1. The I-25 frontage road must be relocated to provide adequate spacing between the frontage road and the I-25 ramp where they intersect County -6- Road 24. The State Highway Department has expressed a need for spacing these intersections to allow for future signalization. 2. In order to avoid adverse noise impact, the building should be setback a minimum of 410 feet from the center of I-25. 3. Site improvements must allow for the continued, unrestricted flow of the Rural Ditch across the property. 4. The properties on the north and east sides of the site are zoned Agriculture. Design of this site should attempt to minimize impacts on these properties . 5. Parking is a design parameter not limited to this site. Parking spaces should be within a reasonable distance from the building. This requires locating parking on all sides of the building. The proposed site design allows for the relocation of the frontage road with design specifications which meet the standards of the State Highway Department. This relocation will be approximately 600 feet east of the existing ramp matching the alignment proposed by the Commercial 3 Subdivision mentioned in the 10-30-86 letter from the State Highway Department. Meetings with that property owner showed it is still their intent to allow realignment to that location. The proposed site design provides a 390 foot building setback and a 160 foot parking setback from the property east of this site. The building is setback 850 feet and the parking lot 540 feet from the north property line. These set- backs have been maximized to limit impacts on those properties. The proeprties on the north and east sides are used for pasture and crop raising. Future uses -7- projected by the Comprehensive Plan include agriculture or agriculture related uses. The church-school use is compatible with existing and projected uses of those properties. The properties adjacent to the southwest edge of this site are vacant. These are two 5-acre commercial zoned sites. The church-school building is over 700 feet from the nearest commercial property. When the frontage road is relocated, it will separate the majority of the commercial property from the church site. There is adequate space between these uses to avoid any conflicts. Natural Hazards This property is not located in a floodplain or geologic hazard area. This pro- perty is not located in a Weld County Airport overlay district. -8- CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT August 8, 1986 Mr. Kenneth C. Dell Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 500 Coffman St. , Suite 107 Longmont, CO 80501 REs Water Service Dear Mr. Dell: This letter is in response to your request for water service to serve the following described propertyi NE Corner of Hwy 119 & Interstate Hwy 25 Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied , including easements where required for District facilities . Central Weld County Water District requires that contracts be consumated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this letter , or this letter shall become null and void unless extended in writing by the District . Very truly yours , CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER OIST T Dale D. 0lhausen Secretary - Manager DDO/caa 2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley,Colorado 80631 • (303)352-1284 • Dale D.Olhaueen,Manna GRANT, BERNARD 8c LYONS WALLACE H. GRANT ATTORNEYS AT LAW HOWARD GRANT 19 0 6-1 9 6 61 DANIEL F BERNARD 515 KIMBARK STREET JOHN 5. HOUGH tl91B-19791 RICHARD N. LYONS LISA N. SHIMEL POST OFFICE BOX 976 LONGMONT 13031 776-9900 JEFFREY J. HAHN LONOMONT, COLORADO 0O5O0-O970 DENVER METRO 13 031 571-5506 SUZAN D. FRITCHEL OF COUNSEL October 9, 1986 WILLIAM J. MCCARREN Mr. Ken Dell Rocky Mountain Consultants 500 Coffman Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 Re: Preliminary Commitment Dear Ken: At the October 9, 1986 meeting of the Board of Directors of the St. Vrain Sanitation District, the Board voted to issue a preliminary commitment to service the tract of land located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Colorado Highway 119 and I-25. This preliminary commitment to serve is based upon the representation that the potential use would not be high density residential nor manufacturing, which would burden the District' s projected capacity. Because the tract is located within the District, the user will be responsible for connecting the internal sewer infrastructure, if any, to the District' s lines upon (1) execution of a service agreement; (2) purchase and payment of the required number of taps; and (3) compliance with, and subject to, all of the District' s Rules and Regulations. The District did not establish an expiration date for this preliminary commitment but I suggest that you contact the District as soon as you are aware of the number of single family equivalent (SFE) taps which would be required. ( I am enclosing a copy of the District's Rules and Regulations. Please refer to pages 7 through 10 to calculate the SFE' s. ) The District will then issue a preliminary commitment for an established number of taps. That commitment may or may not have an expiration date depending on the number of formal applications for taps which are received prior to completion of the facilities. If you have any questions, please con att me. //Very tru yours, Richard N. Lyons RNL:ms SAINT-L.DEL Enclosure cc: St. Vrain Sanitation District 1431 Mountain Bell • 1855 South Flatiron Court Boulder , Colorado 80301 September 29 , 1986 Rocky Mountain Consultants , Inc . Attn : Kenneth C. Dell 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 Longmont , Colorado 80501 Dear Ken, This is in regards to the project located at the northeast corner of I25 and Highway 119 for the church. Mountain Bell will provide service to this project . Both the church and the proposed business property will be served from the capacity point located at the northeast corner of 125 and Highway 119 . There are no private lines available at this time . Sincerely yours , Dennis L. Smith Assistant Manager �oNCMoar Mrwor. �' _ - LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (, \ , l �.. ,>,;o•� ii ,/ 9119 County Line Rd., Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710. NeT"FcnoN C' David Bierwiler Conrad Hopp Richard Hicks Mike Holubec,Jr. Felix Owen Wilbur Nuss Fire Chiel Director Director Director Director Director 18 September 1986 Mr. Kenneth C. Dell Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Dear Mr. Dell: In reference to the development of a Church Complex in the Northeast corner of the Intersection of I-25 Frontage Road and Weld County Road #24 (Highway 119) particularily in part of the West k of the Southwest % of Sec. 2 T2N R68W. The complex is within the Longmont Fire Protection District's service area and will be served by fire units from the Central Fire Station at 9119 County Line Road and the Mead Fire Station at 499 3rd Street, ,Mead, Colorado. Should you -have any questions please contact this office. Sincerely, �7 ..-Leil-art. A2 -an William R. Emerson Fire Marshal WRE/wre Copies: Board of Directors (5) Secretary/Attorney Chief File (3) JcXnNSION AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this _L day of .541/64il , 1986, by and between MILTON S. KAHN and EDWIN S. KAHN (referred to as "Sellers") , and NEW CREATION MINISTRIES and WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, a Colorado non-profit Corporation (referred to as "Purchaser ") . 1. Recitals. By contract effective June 11, 1986 , (referred to as June Contract) , David Macy, as purchaser and Sellers agreed to purchase and sell real property in Weld County, Colorado, together with water stock. With Sellers' consent, Macy subsequently assigned his right, title and interest in the June Contract to New Creation Ministries and World Outreach Center Church (now referred to as . the "Purchaser ") , and Macy was released from any continuing obligation under the June Contract. 2. Modification. Because conditions contained in the June Contract have not been satisfied, the Sellers and Purchaser desire to extend the closing of the June Contract pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in this Extension Agreement. Unless specifically changed, the terms of the June Contract shall govern. 3. Extension. Closing shall be extended to December 15, 1986, provided all of the provisions in Paragraph 10 of the June Contract are satisfied. 4. purchase Price. Purchaser received an official survey of the real property. The net usable acreage of the land be ' n purchased is 49.692 acres. Purchaser agrees to pay net usuable acre based on 50.00 acres, or a total purr ase price of 5. Conditiong precedent. Paragraph 10 of the June Contract provides a number of conditions precedent to closing. By this Agreement, closing is extended to December 15, 1986 , subject to fulfillment of all of the conditions precedent. Sellers represent that they have begun the process to secure a special exemption to the subdivision requirements of Weld County. Purchaser represents that it will submit a site plan for approval simultaneously with the submittal of the application for special exemption. If the special exemption or subdivision approval is not obtained by December 15, 1986 , Purchaser shall have the option to: A. Declare this contract to be null and void and obtain a refund of all moneys paid to Sellers as earnest or option money; 1 B. Extend the closing date for a period of sixty days subject to satisfaction of all conditions precedent to closing; or C. Deposit payment, as provided in the contract, into an escrow account. The escrow account shall be closed within sixty days of December 15, 1986 , provided all conditions precedent are met. At the time of Purchaser's deposit, Sellers shall deposit the warranty deed required in the June Contract. If all conditions are not timely satisfied, the contract shall be null and void and all money deposited in escrow or paid to Sellers shall be refunded to Purchaser. If Purchaser has not obtained site plan approval within thirty days after Sellers obtain subdivision approval, Purchaser may declare the contract to be null and void and obtain a refund of all money paid to Sellers in accordance with Paragraph 10.02 of the June Contract, or elect to extend the contract as provided in Paragraph 10.03 of the June Contr ct. 41 Dated this �' day of SCIZrl{�/A' , 1986 . • SEME .C.__ PURCHASER : NEW CREATION MINISTRIES AND MILTON k. KAHN ' WORLD OUTREACH CENTER CHURCH, a H C 1 at- Col on-profit corporation, EDWIN S. KAHN BY President 2 �..,: n4 VACANT yak OPTIOK CONTRACT This option contract for the purchase and sale of vacant land is entered into by and between DAVID MACY, or assignee, (Purchaser), and MILTON L. KAHN and EDWIN S. KAHN, (Sellers). 1 . Prooertr. 1 .01 Sellers agree to sell and Purchaser agrees to Purchase that certain unimproved real property, together with all improvements thereon, if any, located in -Weld County, Colorado, and legally described on Exhibit A , as outlined in green, attached and incorporated by reference , together with all appurtenant easements and rights-of-way. Hereinafter called the "Property". Said property contains 54.625 acres, more or less. 1 .02 Included in the purchase price shall be one and one- half (1-1/2) shares of the Rural Ditch. 1 .03 Included in the purchase price shall be all , of Sellers' interest in oil , gas and other mineral rights, if any , including but not limited to, any and all ores, metals, all coal , oil shale , asphaltum and other hydrocarbons , geothermal resources, sand, gravel , clay, rock and other substances. Seller shall provide a written title opinion regarding the status of such rights. 2. Purchase Price. 2.01 Purchase price for the property shall be ass per net usable acre of land. In this regard , the net usable acreage of the Property shall be established by the survey and certificate of acreage prepared by a Colorado Registered Land Surveyor (R.L.S.) The Survey shall be subject to Purchaser's approval. For purposes of this Agreement, "net usable" shall be defined as the amount of acreage of land on the Property as determined by the Surveyor, as reduced by (i) any land within the one hundred year flood plain upon which no improvements can be constructed; (ii) all dedications of land on the Property made prior to the Closing or made in connection with Purchaser's intended use and development of the Property for non- commercial purposes; and (iii) land within rights-of-way, easements, river and stream beds, and irrigation ditches. The purchase price per net usable acre shall be prorated on a square foot basis if the net usable acreage is determined to be a part of an acre. If the survey of the property shows that net usable acreage is less than 50 acres, by written notice to Purchaser, Sellers shall have the right to terminate the contract within Twenty (20) days; provided, however, within Ten (10) days after notification of Sellers' intent to terminate, Purchaser shall have the right 1 /144/ to elect to continue the contract and pay the stated purchase price based on a minimum of 50 usable acres. 3. Payment L Purchasg Price. 3.01 Purchaser pays unto Sellers the sum of MOM as a earnest money payment. In the event of closing, the payment shall be credited to Purchaser against the purchase price. 3.02 Additional cash or certified funds at time of closing to equal an amount of la of the purchase price. 3.03 The balance of the purchase price shall be payable by Purchaser's good and sufficient promissory note payable to Sellers. The principal balance of the note shall bear interest at the rate of 9 1 /2% per annum. The note shall be secured by a 1st Deed of Trust against the Property, a first lien against the Rural Ditch stock and shall be payable: A. Interest only on a monthly basis for Three (3) years. B. Principal balance and accrued interest shall be payable in full Three (3) years from date. C. Purcnaser shall have the right to prepay any amount at any time without penalty. D. Deed of Trust shall include a strict due on sale clause. 4. Title 4.01 Within Fifteen (15) days of mutual execution, Sellers, at their sole cost and expense , shall deliver to. Purchaser a Title Insurance Commitment (T.I.C.) dated subsequent to the date of this Agreement, pertaining to the Property. Purchaser will within a reasonable time after delivery of the T.I.C., order and pay for an A.L.T.A. survey , dated subsequent to the date of this Agreement, prepared by a Colorado Registered Land Surveyor, acceptable to Purchaser, depicting all those exceptions which are set forth on the T.I.C. Said survey shall also show the location of all visible utilities, easements and improvements. The Surveyor shall also provide a certificate of acreage. For a period of Twenty (20) days from the date the T.I.C., copies of all exceptions set forth therein and the A.L.T.A. survey plotting all exceptions are delivered to Purchaser, Purchaser shall have the right to either approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove said documents in conjunction with the title insurance requirements set forth in Paragraph 8 hereof. If no written approval or conditional approval is mailed to Sellers within said period of time, Purchaser shall be deemed to have disapproved said documents. 2 In the event the purchase and sale of the Property closes, Sellers agree to reimburse Purchaser the cost of the survey at the time of closing. 4.02 If Purchaser conditionally approves the T.I.C., the A.L.T.A. survey or any items contained in the related documents, then for a period of Five (5) days after written notice to Sellers of said conditional approval , Sellers shall either agree to promptly cure said items prior to the Closing or elect not to cure said items and give written notice of such election to Purchaser . 4.03 If Purchaser disapproves the T.I.C., the A.L.T.A. survey or any items contained in the related documents, or conditionally approves the P.T.R., the A.L.T.A. survey or any items contained in the related documents, and Sellers elect not to cure said items conditionally approved within the designated time periods, then this transaction shall terminate and this contract shall be null and void and Purchaser's earnest money shall be returned to Purchaser within Five (5) days. 4.04 Sellers shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient general Warranty Deed to Purchaser at the time of closing, conveying the Property, free and clear of all taxes, except for taxes for the year of closing which shall be prorated, and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except those approved by Purchaser pursuant to this paragraph 4. Sellers shall also deliver to Purchaser the documents necessary to properly convey the Rural Ditch stock to Purchaser free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 5. Charges. prorations. 5.01 The cost for obtaining an A.L.T.A. Owners Extended Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, and related endorsements, shall be paid by Sellers. Sellers shall reimburse Pu chaser for cost of Survey at Closing. ,/p 0 j1'/ 5.02 The cost fo btaining an .�:A." wa Extended Coverage Policy of Title Ins d related endorsements, and the A.L.T.A. Survey shall ai Sellers. 5.03 All expenses and charges incurred to discharge delinquent taxes, bonds, liens and all other encumbrances affecting the Property shall be paid by Sellers. 5.04 General taxes for the year of closing, based on most recent levy and assessment, prepaid rents, sewer rents shall be apportioned to date of delivery of deed. 6. Amendments. 6.01 All amendments and/or supplements to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by each party hereto. However, 3 such execution may be in counterparts and shall be deemed to constitute one document. 7. Commissions. 7.01 Sellers shall be solely responsible for the payment of all commissions to sales eo le and brokers, including a broker's commission of ` of the purchase price to be divided equally between Four Seasons Realty and Macy-Prescott & Co. Purchaser warrants he has not incurred any additional commission obligation. 8. Title Insurance. 8.01 Payment for the title insurance policy shall be paid at closing and as soon as possible after closing, Sellers shall cause to be issued to Purchaser , an A.L.T.A. Owners Extended Policy of Title Insurance on the Property insuring Purchaser in an amount equal to the actual purchase price for the Property as containing only those exceptions approved by Purchaser pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. 9. yesianatioa at Assignee. 9.01 Purchaser shall not have the right to assign the rights and obligations in this Agreement to another party prior to closing, except with Sellers' written consent. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Purchaser shall disclose the name of the proposed Assignee within ten days of mutual execution. The closing shall be contingent upon Sellers' approval . In the event of assignment, Purchaser shall he relieved of any continuing obligation under this contract and Assignee shall be substituted to perform the obligations of this Agreement. 10. Conditions precedents a flailing. 10.01 The following are conditions precedent to the Closing of this transaction. Each condition must be approved by Purchaser at Purchaser ' s sole discretion or be waived by Purchaser in writing within Sixty (60) days of the mutual execution of this A reement //';These conditions are neither warranties nor representations. H& (L /17 / A. The Property Can be purchased in accordance with all zoning regulations, laws, ordinances and statutes. B. Written confirmation in form and substance satisfactory to Purchaser that the intended non-commercial use and operation of the Property is authorized by and in compliance with all existing zoning, land-use, building, fire, health, labor and safety laws, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to the Property. C. Approval by Purchaser of a report done at Purchaser's own cost and expense, to believe that soil conditions 4 of the property will not preclude or unreasonably hinder the development and use of the Property. D. Site plan approval by Weld County and satisfactory evidence that a building permit can be obtained for the development and use of the Property. E. Written assurance by any person or entity holding any leasehold rights to the Property that no surface excavation or exploration will be performed on the Property. F. Satisfactory evidence that the Property will have suitable access from Colorado Highway 119/County Road 24, and have suitable utility service to the Property. 10.02 If any of the requirements described in Paragraph 10.01 are not approved by Purchaser, Purchaser may elect to waive any of the preceding conditions in writing. No such waiver shall reduce the rights and remedies of Purchaser by reason of any breach of any warranties or representations made to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement. In the event Purchaser does not waive any of the conditions, Purchaser may elect to terminate this Agreement in writing and obtain the refund of any monies paid to Sellers.** 10.03 Purchaser may elect to extend the period to satisfy the conditions in Paragraph 10.01 for an additional Sixty (60) days by paying to Sellers an additional option payment equal to the original option amount. Said option payment shall be held subject to the same terms and conditions of the original option payment. 11. Compliance with $ubdiv Was. Luang $egulations. 11 .01 At the time of Closing, Sellers shall cause to be conveyed to Purchaser a legally subdivided parcel of real estate for which Purchaser can obtain a building permit for its intended development within agricultural zoning. Within Sixty (60) days of the mutual execution of this Agreement, Sellers shall obtain subdivision approval . If Sellers fail to do so, this contract shall be null and void and all monies deposited shall be refunded to Purchaser. During this Sixty (60) day period, Purchaser shall concurrently work to obtain site plan approval and satisfactory evidence that a building permit can be obtained for the development and use of the property. Sellers agree to bear any and all costs and expenses associated with obtaininL the necessary approval for the proper subdivision of the Property. Purchaser agrees to bear any and all costs associated with site plan and building permit approval. 12. Closing. 12.01 Unless extended as provided, Closing shall occur within Sixty (60) days from the mutual execution of this Agreement, upon Ten ( 10) days' written notice given by Purchaser to Sellers, ** So long as Sellers have expended reasonable efforts to obtain satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, Purchaser's sole remedy shall be to waive the condi- tions or to terminate this Agejent and obtain the refund of any monies paid to Sellers. 'to! �/C III'! 5 provided that Purchaser shall have the right to extend the date of Closing for an additional Sixty (60) days if Purchaser elects its option pursuant to Paragraph 10.03. 12.02 Purchaser shall be entitled to possession of the Property at the Closing. Between the date of this Agreement and the Closing date or earlier termination of this Agreement, Purchaser , its agents and independent contractors shall be entitled to enter the Property at no cost, for early occupancy purposes and to the extent necessary or appropriate for the purpose of making required teats, surveying, land—use planning, and doing whatever else is reasonably necessary or appropriate for the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement or development of the Property, provided however that Purchaser shall not be permitted to perform any pre—construction excavation , destruction of existing improvements or new construction without Sellerst prior written consent. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold Sellers harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities, or liens arising directly out of this entry by Purchaser onto the Property. Including, but not limited to , legal fees incurred in enforcing this indemnification. 12.03 Purchaser shall take possession of the Property subject to the existing tenancy of Francis Gregersen (Tenant). Tenant has paid rent to Seller for 1986 in the amount of $5 , 150.00. This rent will not be pro rated at closing. Purchaser acknowledges that it will not take any action on the property during 1986 to interfere with Tenant or the crop planted by Tenant. Sellers represent that the tenancy does not exceed a year to year farm tenancy. Sellers shall be responsible for properly notifying the Tenant and terminate the tenancy no later than December 31 , 1986. Sellers shall provide Purchaser with a copy of the written farm lease, if any, or detail of the terms of the lease within Ten ( 10) days of the mutual execution of this Agreement. 13. Successors Ana Apsign8. 13.01 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Purchaser and Sellers and their respective successors and assigns. 14. Entire Agreement. 14.01 The parties acknowledge and agree that at all times they have intended that none of the preliminary negotiations would be binding on either party, and that they would be bound to each other only by a single formal comprehensive document containing this paragraph and all of the agreements of the parties, in final form, which has been executed by Purchaser and Seller. The parties acknowledge that none of the prior oral and written agreements between them (and none of the representations on which either of them has relied) relating to the subject matter of this Agreement shall have any force or effect whatever, 6 except as and to the extent that such agreements and representations have been incorporate JO this Agreement. 15. Time Zs QL Las. Essence. 15.01 Purchaser and Seller mucuUU. ;iy agree that time is of the essence throughout the term of this Agreement and every provision hereof in which time is an element. No extension of time for performance of any obligations or acts shall be deemed an extension of time for performance of any other obligations or acts. If any date for performance of any of the terms , conditions, or provisions hereof shall fall on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, then the time of such performance shall be extended to the next business day thereafter. 16. Defaujl. 16.01 If Purchaser is in default, then all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be forfeited by Purchaser and retained on behalf of Seller and both parties shall thereafter be released from all obligations hereunder. It is agreed that such payments and things of value are liquidated damages and (except as provided iA paragraph 16.03) , are 'the Sellers' sole and only remedy for the Purchaser's failure to perform the obligations of this contract. Seller expressly waives the remedies of specific performance and additional damages. 16.02 If Sellers are in default, (i) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as terminated, in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder ahall be returned to Purchaser and Purchaser may recover such damages as may be proper; or (ii) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damages, or both. 16.03 Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, in the event of any litigation arising out of this contract, the Court may award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney's fees. 17. Notices. 17.01 Notices required by this Agreement may be served personally or in writing and mailed by certified or registered mail , return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: To Sellers: Milton L. Kahn c/o Foster Mortgage Co. 1873 S. Bellaire Street, #200 Denver, CO 80222 7 With copies to: Edwin S. Kahn 1441 Eighteenth St. , #300 Denver, CO 80202-1292 Michael L. Gilbert 50 South Steele Street, #580 Denver, CO 80209 To Purchasers: Mr. David Macy 500 Coffman Street, Suite 202 Longmont, Colorado 80501 With Copies to: Mr. Bob Keller Four Seasons Realty 2432 N. Main Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 Mr. Phillip S. Wong Attorney at Law P.O. Box 267 Longmont, Colorado 80502-0267 Notices shall be deemed received at the earlier of actual receipt or Two (2) business days following mailing. 18. Attorney's Fees. 18.01 In the event either party is required to file any action in order to enforce the terms of this Agreement, or to recover damages for the violation of same, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court in such action, in addition to whatever other remedies or damages it may be entitled, shall be entitled to recover all of its court costs and attorney's fees as a result thereof from the losing party. 19. ha Merger. Survival Closing. 19.01 The obligations, representations and warranties herein contained shall survive closing and shall not merge with transfer of title but shall remain in effect until forfeited. 20. Notice of Realtor Transaction. 20.01 Notice is given to Sellers that Purchaser, David Macy, is a licensed Colorado Realtor. Mr. Macy will receive a commission from the closing of this transaction. Notice is also given to Purchaser that Milton L. Kahn is a licensed real estate 8 sales person in the State of Colorado. Neither Sellers or Purchaser make any representations as to the actual worth of the Property. TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., RIR"- _23 , 1986. g SELLE V 4111141 PURCHASER: MILTON(LC1UN DAVID MACY EDWIN S. KAHN ( DATE: 144 DATE: J JNa ' HH M'( 9 1 I ' t u., C. C.a v.. on, Pm.,' I , LO CODUTY, cs+.dt4OC a tub s ••..M4 ' Iv W Cat .,.c J. 1 . II T e Y , 4.11, •.1S•Sb•401. 1 I • I/9 s•I*ISGG' �,•M,[41.04• anira O44 IP,A14.1 I 1 4' IIIGI JT it' �_ . III • ' I I ► I 1 I I ts l Y1.4L% east A , 3 N II • la " ` N • i 4! V a , 1 ' * `� LOT '8' I ` •a i S.ode A< • L — K.. . •* 4 w s.S'1•a 'e a s y 169 6► ,t � 9 G / • . �) l_e r -/a• - 'A.L.15 AttEO h v ye e, e _ �tT 'B • 5 Occ �[!S i v • � TAT4. - 64.429 Alta r f. i .1 s l !v toc•eac2 it ' iu,t.4.•v _ a � � Pal SLAM Yr • '� PYL.IY W,*iC.L .I _._ _ _F4�Q . 11..0 4 wear.:04 a —• Y.►•+-.4.n9-V. 16456 Tel.So' 1 i . P.G.5. . _ I �_ I i.s: . ��< a i •, �� • 400 O ..._ 2 r Iamps.* i. ii „P1'•hl . C.�14 2W LOL/►TIOU MIaP ♦• / LGT S I .. ' ; Ce1d.Mgt M9 • uevuNee tf.. rife , • f .y. .i.. J • E M `' ' ' I V VEHIBIT S Tentative kraal ➢eacrintion Subject to survey, the Property is described as: A part of Lot A shown on Lot A of recorded Exemption No. 1313-2-3-RE730, recorded January 16, 1985, Book 1055, Reception No. 1995539) less approximately 5 acres shown in the area marked in red on attached map, South of Lot B in the same exemption, fronting Colorado Highway 119. The Property consists of approximately 54.625 acres. 10 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property W 1/4, Sec. 2, T2N, R68W, 6th P.M. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Cleric and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. 9 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this I7 day of ( //�t7�Mi ILLY 19 5' WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: ‘42-,76P---11 Notary Public P' Ise print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION NO. 6999 York St. St. Vrain Land Co. Denver, CO 80229 62131302000004 Same as above. Same as above. 62131302000043 6750 E. Eastman Ave. Milton L. & Edwin S. Kahn Denver, CO 80224 62131302000047 2323 S. Troy St. #113 Waterford Ranch Co. Aurora, CO 80014 62131302000048 Stener J. & 4111 Glade Rd. Francis E. Carlson Loveland, CO 80537 62131303000016 Clarence J. & 1203 Princeton Court Vivian P. Evers Longmont, CO 80501 62131303000032 _ Ronald L. & 1119 Windslow Circle Darlene F. Fahrenholtz Longmont, CO 80501 62131303000033 Chevron U.S.A. , Inc . P. O. Box 7611 Property Tax Section San Francisco, CA 94120 62131303000035 Burger Avenue 125 South Howes, Fifth Floor Investments, Ltd. Fort Collins, CO 80521 62131310100012 Weld County Greeley, CO 80631 62131310100027 P. O. Box 948 Grant Brothers Longmont, CO 80501 62131311000001 Certified to November 3, 1986 at 7 : 45 A. M. SECURITY ABSTRACT COMPANY OFWELD COUNTY BY �AAMIc ,� sgA4l�vTik, _ . _ AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property SW 1/4, Sec. 2, T2N, R68W, 6th P.M. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /7 day of �4.4 L,l.L,y7tA-) , 19 c. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 02- 261 Notary Public MINERAL OWNERS AND LESSEES All oil , gas and other mineral rights of whatever kind or character, including, but not necessarily limited to, any and all ores and metals , all coal , oil shale, asphaltum and other hydrocarbons, geothermal resources, sand, gravel , clay, rock and other substances , as reserved by Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn in the Deed recorded February 4, 1985 in Book 1057 as Reception No. 1997381, and any interest therein or rights thereunder. (Affects Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-2-3-RE730, recorded January 16, 1985 in Book 1055 as Reception No. 1995539) . Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn c/o Foster Mortgage Company 1873 South Bellaire Street, Suite 200 Denver, Colorado 80222 Oil and gas lease between Milton L. Kahn and Edwin S. Kahn and Amoco Production Company dated November 6, 1972, recorded December 6, 1972 in Book 681 as Reception No. 1603120 and re-recorded August 13, 1973 in Book 697 as Reception No. 1619262, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production pur- suant to '73 CRS 38-42-106, by Amoco Production Company, recorded August 6, 1975 in Book 745 as Reception No. 1666596. Amoco Production Company Post Office Box 40 Dupont, Colorado 80024-0040 Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc n�im. t' r " +LfiW y ',-;(41,41 V' $ ti 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 • '141, Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283 November 20, 1986 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: New Christian Ministeries Church Special Use Permit Dear Mr. Schuett: This letter is part of the application for a Use By Special Review Permit for a church at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of I-25 and State Highway 119. A Soils Investigation Report and a letter addressing the Fl gravel deposit are enclosed. Rural Ditch Company The Rural Ditch crosses the south end of this site. Mr. David Camenisch, repre- sentative of the Ditch Company, stated that the Ditch Company Board of Directors will have to approve any ditch crossings and drainage into the ditch. Design for the ditch crossing and any drainage to the ditch will be done according to Ditch Company specifications. Waste Removal The church will contract with a local hauler for waste removal . Dumpsters will be located on site for convenient weekly pick-up. Gravel Deposit This property has been identified as an Fl sand and gravel deposit by the Colorado Geological Survey. An analysis of the potential for removing the sand and gravel has been completed and shows that it is not economically feasible. Please see the enclosed letter from Kenneth Rollin. Page 2 Mr. Keith Schuett New Christian Ministeries Church Landscaping This is a large site and landscaping will be installed as funds are available. The church intends to present an attractive setting. Initial landscaping is planned between the building and parking areas. The remaining area will be maintained with native grasses until funds are available for installing play fields and more formal landscaping. Storm Drainage A storm detention pond area is planned at the northeast corner of the site. The intent is to detain storm water on site and release it at a flow rate meeting the standards of 1Je1d County. Calculations for detention pond sizing and storm water run-off are attached. Weld County Road 24 The Engineering Department has indicated that this road will not support addi- tional traffic from development. They have requested additional right-of-way and improvements to this roadway. The church is willing to enter into an Improvements Agreement for their share of improvements to this roadway adjacent to their site. Thank you for assisting us on this project. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. "Xi / pc 77 Kenneth C. Dell , A. I.C.P. KCD/cvr Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc � ', a a t y„ ;as • a A ict ^ il,k11.1.,snag 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283 November 19, 1986 Mr. Keith A. Schuett Weld County Planning Department 915 - 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Special Use Permit New Creation Ministries Church Dear Mr. Schuett: The New Creation Ministries ' property is on a parcel of 54.625 acres which is bordered for a short distance on the south by WCR 24 and the proposed Kahn Subdivision, on the north by WCR 241t2, on the west by the I-25 frontage road. The property is an average of 1000' wide and 2000' long. However, the property is transversed by Rural Ditch in a northeast southwesterly direction and a north-south 50' gas line easement approximately 150' west of the east boundary. There is an existing house on the western boundary of the property which exists on the frontage road. The Colorado Highway Department has preliminary plans for interchange realignment which would also cross the southern portion of this pro- perty. With the setbacks from the county roads, the frontage road, from the gas line easement , the Rural Ditch and the existing dwelling, there is only approxi - mately 20 acres of the parcel which could possibly be mined. We have not done any drilling on this property but it appears that an aggregate resource does exist based on proximity to existing gravel pits and drilling which has been done on other parcels in the area. However, because of the small area involved, approximately 20 acres and the isolation from the other mineable parcels in the area by roads and a gas line , it would not be economically feasible, in my opi - nion, to operate an open pit mine on such a small parcel and it would not be practical to do this because of the aforementioned barriers. Therefore, it is my opinion that this property should be exempt from the requirement of mining prior to the development. If I can be of further help, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. K n Rollin, P.E. Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. , -F 500 Coffman Street, Suite 107 • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 772-5282 Offices also located in Denver and Estes Park, CO • Metro line: 665-6283 ° k November 20, 1986 Mr. Drew L. Scheltinga, P.E. Weld County Engineering Department P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: New Creation Ministries Special Review Permit Plan Map Dear Mr. Scheltinga: Enclosed herewith is a Preliminary Drainage Analysis for the referenced project. It is based upon the Soil Conversation Service Technical Release No. 55 (2nd Edition) . It has been prepared per the minimum standards for storm water management as identified in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. Historic and developed peak runoff rates have been calculated and the resulting required detention storage volume is shown. Release from the detention pond through the dike will be controlled to the allowable (historic) rel ease rate by means of a rectangular weir device. The proposed church facility and drainage related information is shown on the accompanying Drainage Plan Map. Please call if you have any questions during your review of this information. I will await your review comments on this submittal and look forward to meeting with you to discuss the project. Respectfully submitted, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. John B. Cummings, Jr., P.E. cc: Pastor James Miller = cUMA4/,,`‘‘, Qj`•••••••. "vr s 8-5518 f&ICS° c.o.., 4 • 14733 : qT ....••g-- £OF C9k-u RIBC ROCKY MOUN ...IN CONSULTANTS, INC. / ' / / •Professional Engineers• CLIENT: NSN/ C/C/EAr/o/f /—/I/y/_T2/GS JOB NO.: 8 s s /8 SHEET / OF //3 DESCRIPTION: DRA//'Fi C,,E A/ A/ y✓`/s DESIGNED BY: Jul, DATE: ////0r� Cei te., N /7-S, Z'?i� /�WS� //J CHECKED BY: DATE: PAA-/,//4c7 . 4/141-YS/s (3AsFn 0/✓ So/ C-ot&exihazioci ss,ey/es 7--- --0/44c,€) ,,?,EL JsE /jD. Ss (za ,C.v/Tio 2/a - vi B,So/L ryes_ 4t✓0 YD, oL0 6/C sit TY/',E 1. 50 0,4/' e f /c Ont- ,()r L Yf.F Cre s �� o/1 Jr)/ = 8 / ,4c.-zo or s / ),2 7,04 A p 6JOLLS .s72dcci- to ) #711-e npi'c. / you/0 D (see sAva �y A / �J / l B Shot Z. /444- o RQrm-J _ / y/"_ VDAl4 7±6 76 Nye*/e7A-off sic ..-ca// Aye_. /gLTVA„/ L /n4' 5� 0v� .8 7 C. 2u do P,C C1/22i, ,C /S/v nnt3,E/2 ('son ...7/Jac. - 9 ) z, Nor-Q4. KL)/n-/ ,Li/`/tk c.c.s" y/2e,49 - naP /17-fro *ft Gw1&//ir•- CA/-:" 78 llc,e*//-e., CA S, yX 9/ t (75t '711; 7178) 80. 1 8.971- ¢4Az O. gur/oGF Q z Q , (f _ o,2,5) "ge /c/et t 0,8s) JP in ,�nc/�.z� ✓'fis-re l2=� rtt/'n T /'Uno# //s' A/4 u 4:1V) P= *D z . zz4-17urtrec.:p f, 4 542e._ s/iee//o) 000 _ /O /000 s C� - /° z. ea/ _ ( - o. zXz4) 7 _ g.o t0.Pxz,0%8 E 7-/Mc of C / CS:41.P/k776 /4"/D 772AvEL 7?,4E 2- -= 77c7L-,)/, ) jam = Cav U Sacesv6 /+ev/s grac ROCKY MOUN 'MIN CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professional Engineers• CLIENT: JOB NO.: SHEET OF /3 DESCRIPTION: DESIGNED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: d. 5 V (vnpavee) - /�. /3¢5 (5) o+ e s= wm tduyye., 44/9. - . oo ¢ 1/1 V= /, ot A..5 L = i?s AS- f T /== /moo�/�dL) = D S3 fours a�so 1.04112-, T Mrs as cev-¢. f ///iTo IR/C (,,E44 v/5C#,Q,€ 5 ?P $ � ,, qFp rte$ j wkt ' OP = par c/cce4t d3 g on f f' a&r/`j c. l„;kit" //s 71,-a-4rm- rQ = a z s = (6,Z)(z. 4.6)= . 99G Gr1 (cs�•.,Jr) a eacaoe cry- recivci ie T - . 53 , hail- /1 5'/a csM�•, J (o ct 1py x -s e D. 0!J S Jq. N7/-f-4 Arn = G4a �� rP = /0 �r O 7,rond o.../' swwHP orac� 7 P = (SiolO.4 85 o 9-1/.o) = 87 c f s 0 7- (-5 L-5-74/-i c run°PP r a A u`o /At / e-ai 4 M wm 077`" o �I I s thorn, op ��urrs*�ci" inartu +tJ- q fC ROCKY MOUN .AIN CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professional Engineers• CLIENT: JOB NO.: SHEET_5 OF /.3 DESCRIPTION: DESIGNED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: 1L. DC Vac pr-G> .Se, a C 5,2,2-c.iiRoylei,d &r No-ft, Mr /4. g4,6,4,E/4 or S/T.C = -S1 ,fr-,--.2... /a. P,, �//�.."ac L4--A6 6)--SS- s Co--to/C 4Co- e t, / ,4 0/WA A.r24 Y/ .Or, tAisci2.� `f9'3 B�'t�o //3 L.0.8 2 ,ore -S�1�.aa'/k/s/ / z,5, 535- 0, 6 /• / 3. Bui/et p(/c/va'a�,iv�'+�.e. -,X�uoh� 1r /47, 6000 5. 47- &. z- 4 O�71, .s/p,,e2, - !d:..f) (0„,, ,Iii+r-, > 5J �e _313/, /7T 8. `' /6. 0 - .0/201•-, SP .,e, .. - /2O0Y- 1 4,74, 9.< -5 / 33 / 9/S 30. 5 ri 559 Z,379, 9-6 d S¢. G /00.0 C. Qur/aFF/ �1cvk /u tie AngDE, (s/,� Ariro/2) 41 8,y o:rn 1/J,aui/, D 2., n,a4-/F pr 78 Z/G s�rc -se,/�,n B/ I3 3 dad/41-4,-y 76' ¢ o,20-,,_ ---/-,e_ - 604W' 6,04-754_, - dly dr. so,/i.n,d,o .3 — 6/ Ozo„ s/0o•oe_ - 'eery- (€ 14, - - // a<#471t-t- so, //2 .v yd - 7Y6 _ 4,242,_ 5,..--,..c.. - /ccn- 6„,.4,4-0- — / Cre(oj/z .5OiJ jra- 7 D - 19 A- /4Nr.Ev cA/ �� (/l 3)/98' t (0.4)4)776) * 0. 4)/70 -. (8. a,Y6./) f z/ 6 79/ I 8. 7:17S7) _ 33 //. 3 t ' G r 3. 4 - 9. 8 + z/, f 8.7 p, Rois/ofiic Cp f_ 40 incfu...., Zsyr Z,4 - /74,,-- "ro-<..t.-4.- /coo - /o /ono - /e = 2, 05- S= c.„,"c.„," -_ 83 Z. _ 67 - o. Ls)Z r�t -to,z,yz•oS" (P Fo.8s) - ¢__ -d B s)___ = Z. 29 if T/M.G- D/c GGn/cemineAT/Dd L L, = 22,e ' 0 s_ . o o C y,"„-gee T = 3600 v Lz = 300 ' a s _ . 005 tn;Ped/ 6, lrt r V, = z0. 3t^82(, oe S) = / 51 51 c.r Odra) V/Z = /6./345 (.oaSJ (1 S - / At AS (ur/ov-ai) RIM ROCKY MOUN1. .:,J CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professionaal/l,,Engineers• CLIENT: JOB NO.: SHEET T OF /3 DESCRIPTION: DESIGNED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: OZ A0 = a = Q, 1-Z (54660, 11) 3d d lie „J.-5Ty ' (�600X/i1) = . a 7 r_ 0. 47 /a2rs DEi/GLOP 42) .°S4. ,O/x/1/946,E 11, = o,25 = (O, zxz,oS> = D. 1/ - Q.4/Q/P lz;o l3r P ur�— , , /oz e.-/ /c = D.47 p S/La 11 z .S-3.5cssA /7 M c = / D l D� Q /o p 0 M' mG 62,e- .1.J n �//� /O -7 /(S35 (Ooec� /2.. z9// a) -_ /O4 cPs s e/ev�,O,o�1,449p `.7142,�L. PE7,E447oA/ sTo,e>G,c. R,?q u/I ED 4. PEA,_ /A//c/1 w/ U 07/L---zO' 1 O/Y//A4GE R,4770 pact oV(/ow P& ,Yr��w Runs/�/L c- ` /O T' CS t3. I/OL(l MC 6/ R u4AC Vr' 7O:—...AL- J'' V = 5'3. 33 4 / Qm) t c Vr= !-uno do/unn2 /�.J.E-7) (( �r= e976, 06S> <In = dry /,Jc Q+ oti s8 /kJ ..5-3 .33' cat-o '.�i P.. Vr s /0, 30 Acre-Ind V.S7 / -m,', 2 /v m e, ✓0L me S /3) ,, _ ' vn4.E dF a2Au,E S VS = Vr (Vr) _ 0,32,7D. /3) /. 3.- #cr - �a�T�- 3 fC ROCKY MOLD., FAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professional Engineers• CLIENT: JOB NO.: SHEETS OF /3 DESCRIPTION: DESIGNED BY: DATE: - CHECKED BY: DATE: / Y ,c). 7- 1Y//4/Y _57-e)/ 4-6E MCl//.OE.& 4-ca 2j �"e e actse /J A )4-iceA = z /0 /lcrw C3. DEyrN AT o v,ter _ z S�Q c, ( 2./o)( S) _ / 7S Acre-Peet Rte/EA--. 77?UGrr1/2c Recr7r/4 v4,42 uJ,E/,q ,C/-r'u�r,+/,/5� pp 5, = z w mu, 1, 1�/2- vt o = o0#//in...) cGCsa c- L w 1,o-G`r- Gray L*y711-(" / Lw z yw s lbw = LA. C-.ff� 89 L w p,z)(2,5-) 1 s) 1 _ 7. o f- S / 7 la 7 A. k, t 3(, .1,6C.....4 .. Mt ee r �`_ �' •!• •� 3 ‘`.3..." .fLY. 1..V.' )`.� ?F FI ...el-44n — y� :+*tuntcr ^{ .water I i .. �� Bpi✓ 1 a ^� / $! _ io kg-. . _ 'I LAST . J3 t 11 127 • •i:,.....1..,• '... • 3 water^T "a�B ' kyr,,f k: _,, ;7 t + 1 1 „ Lt ,,,,-,A E '.� '1 �_ • to SITE p r 1 .,t i z7 . C 4 �/ • � � T R i ,1e tt1• 75# ? 76 I y. LL� ' U I r. 11 4 . 7 A . +tP4f n r 7 °r n.. to c°°: a v �. e n °, a... f. / r ..Jy / M )�, 77� �, LY 1 a8 761Nu'A' • l tm;,�r1 d' .. "t76 10 1 X31' • ti #y 1�. 52 r ) . / 72 t___, • �• f,t 7'tyyr' gr t. � 76 C 51 46 'fi 48 27 , y' l?�' 40• i.4 3fl1 Ja1 J Harney t 10 P .'47 76 •.76 �II �. r �'1,, 77 pp 73� Ax ,; RI4D * .77� IR 0 47 9. :, tS 4 .. yt. �S..... .,,. 1 8•1,..t 47 15 51 . 1•3• I76 37-..•o'^'Y�3 14 47 1 ._ p�tl 1377+ t• 7.kw,718! 33 <1 a r, i. )o-1 38 d- 73 ,,e,,, . X 37 • 40 \ rc" 76 — 47. 38 % -2G 4i° .5, qr 7.'i.. ; R668; a • w 7 A • 1 76 k (e l' +� i�tr • .: lllllddlll.; I4! :1 4037 rym..�2m® 6M1• 4_ ,47 1 if11 ,.n 4� A } ., t1/� ti R. 68 W. I R. 6'. 1 '/+ / / 0 is compiled on 1974 aerial }•4 ��—� I---t 1 phy by the U.S. Department 5 000 4000 3 000 2 000 1000 0 Scale 1:2 Iture, Soil Conservation Service LL /� aerating agencies. .j�l Or�-'3 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO S 44 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 133 TABLE 14.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued Flooding High water table Bedrock Soil name and Hydro- Potential map symbol logic Frequency ; Duration Months Depth Kind Months Depth Hard- frost group ness action Ft In 3611: 6� __ __ Shingle D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable 37, 38 B None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Nelson pable 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43 C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Nunn 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 0 None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Olney 49 A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Osgood 50, 51 , 52, 53---- 8 None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Otero 54, 55 B None to rare --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Moderate. Paoli { --- >6.020-40 Rip- Low. 56, 57 C None --- --- ---Renohill pable 58, 59 D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. Shingle pable 6011: Shingle D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable Renohill C None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. pablc 61 D None --- --- >6.0 _--- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. Tassel gable 62, 63 0 None --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Terry pable 64, 65 C None --- >6.0 --- --- .20-40 Rip- Low. Thedalund pable i66, 67 C None --- --- >6.0 1 --- --- >60 --- Low. Ulm 68' A None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Ustic Torriorthents 69, 70 A None --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Valent 7111: Valent A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Loup D Rare to Brief Mar-Jun +.5-1.5 Apparent Nov-May >60 --- Moderate. common. 72 73, 74, 75, (l o{ 77 B None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. ona , See footnote at end of table. fh 80I/3 A _ L WI I 1 la Table 2-2b.—Runoff curve numbers for cultivated agricultural lands' -' `• Curve numbers for ' Cover description hydrologic soil group- 1 Hydrologic Cover type Treatment' condition' A B C D .' '' Fallow Bare soil — 77 86 91 94 Crop residue cover(CR) Poor 76 85 90 93 . Good 74 83 88 90 1 r II Row crops Straight row (SR) Pour 72 81 88 91 Good 67 ® 85 89 SR + CR Poor 71 80 87 90 I ... Good 64 75 82 85 Contoured (C) Poor 70 79 84 88 Good 65 75 82 86 rl C + CR Poor 69 78 83 87 Good 64 74 81 85 Contoured & terraced (C&T) Poor 66 74 80 82 J i. Good 62 71 78 81 C&'1' + CR Poor 65 73 79 81 Good 61 70 77 80 Small grain SR Poor 65 76 84 88 '- Good 63 75 83 87 SR + CR Poor 64 75 83 86 • Good 60 72 80 84 C Poor 63 74 82 85 Good 61 73 81 84 C + CR Poor 62 73 81 84 Good 60 72 80 83 C&T Poor 61 72 79 82 Good 59 70 78 81 1 .• C&T + CR Poor 60 71 78 81 J _ Good 58 69 77 80 Close-seeded SR Poor 66 77 85 89 ' or broadcast Good 58 72 81 85 ai _ legumes or C Poor 64 75 83 85 rotation Good 55 69 78 83 meadow C&T Poor 63 73 80 83 Good 51 67 76 80 J_ _ 'Average runoff condition,-:uirl L, = (1.28. ".s(-ivp residue corer applies only if residue is on at least 5% of the surface throughout. Lbc year. "IIvdrologic condition is based on combination of factors that affect infiltration and runoff, including(a)density and canopy of vegetative -" —areas.(b) amount of yeu.round cover, (c)-amoLUIL of grass or close-seeded legumes in ruLatinns.(d) percent of residue curer on the land stir. four(gaud 3 20%), and(e) degree of surface roughness. . Pow: Factors impair infiltration and tend to increase runoff. Good: Factors encourage average and better than average inlil t'ation and tend to decrease runoff. • `J —2.6 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 3/fief 7 ar /3 107 106 35 104 103 102 I _ 2422 20 2011 24 26 28 30_ 34 34 30 30 _ _34 �_ _ 38_ __ _ 41 io a1 1�7 _ice _ - - T < e 2fi e 1. " ��_ s JI o ' I ItI 2' 4 GREv J 0 6-- — ,: �, 1 1 b V 2 29 8 27. I a I\ 7a (� ovcs I - PL �: AKRON I /EG. EY I DOULDEm I', 40 ANTON „ 2, IT //1 30 I i s., I I. . 17 I 1 i 38 I e __1 14 2B 16 I 30 ! ,i, j ,1 uI 6 197 181 i ,„ Div 26 : I A v 34' BURLINGTON i 3D �2P � 31 o n /'� HUGO �, / 3!iP8F 21' �, � 28 I�L�2B "V' I _ I- 1 39 28 � 000LORADOHAsweu2a 18 83 Ne ^ 7 8 �16 1179 N ��30 ' 36 I Pueoto I _ • — V 1A - a 22 (a �` —� f 7-- I 28 19 � 'i 31 I 38 JUNTA ' 2 * J I Luis (e_3/ VJALS�NBUR¢ __ — —— T- TT —1 c- )28 10 45, r3. 9 , \-- .A4AMO ' A, n / l / -I I SPRINGFIELD I I l3 1 t Valk_.,, / 44/ I l , �, 4 L J a l a 3 i , 16 I/ I 28 ,48 vCL I ' I .I i 3- . I- _' e 3q0 --!�� n"-16-G� -m 24\ 1111 0 0 ti[4[bN 7}3t3b'dd T— ee e �4f e"d4`—4b ��+0 —L'in r--�(S- 37 Figure S-8 I NVW (I„MINIAI A Ill.('of ItVlil.AOMINI.III - 25-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION "e"IALclO LS 0,1511 Ot ',MURE.,,WI II I A„II,°""'°"" '-34—ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR --Lithn,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..„.,PA,,.�.,,,,, PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH un�im i�uN:( „Alain,NIL ANNUAL 5A - /o al/ I SHEET 3 OF 5 37 106 105 104 103 "•.`...`••.-.•., 102 , _ -, o man 11 111111 1■1111IPS 4 - 2 IIIIIIIu■iIUN iiui 111 1IIIRlJ1:p i - 11111 �� ■ � - 1iiiu1iii■■■■ 1111510111 - I I IR — c ;:�::E:I ;7, , . ' o■■■ ■■■.■. E■ c IOWA 'iiiii Ii -.i _ 111111iiiuiiIpaIIdIi1iiDhI!!I! 1 1 ■■■ 0 , i ! ' ' 1 = 4; 1 I ■■! pall a� 1111111 = widd00,46101M4 �Il1 i _ c. I - i 111111 , .r i 111111 111 ,45.,=1:ro � I ` � M'ftA � ' O 11 11 f QI � �E - - ii.... AI uuuu.■a.0 �.� .�■— 1 111 , A r■■■n� u..■uI I .l.■■ a !II!ti4ZU4',!'l'l"l'!"l"la - 1 _ ■■C■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■_ 111 ,x! tiram 81■■ 11111.■ti 111 11■ pproprar 11111011111 _I i WWII_ MIMI 1 W wows I _min 1111 II Il l Vi _ 1 _ I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 _. 0 O60O 0 o o o 0 o2 _1 C C o o 0 0 C) u /wsa ` (rb) a6aeyasp dead ; pup "1 I. 4-6 (210-VI TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) shy J sC.j C-U/'iK, /y v nue/ / -c.,ii-eti • /p- G . -1__,4-a OFF / rf-C-6 5J • ' ._ .$ _ p6 I--,,,,gi"s/' '7'cc�,i/, on, /''? 101, v7'i`"'/�"�71' ' S �dan _ /O C/I= ✓Y i Cv /1/4262...-6c7- \/ �� 1'�Y Gii/ Table 2-2a.—Itunof�u� numbe0 rs for urban areas �c /r//' /- /"' ,( 72en,„DC... Curve numbers for f/•-,gcaa .�/uN � on— over description i hydrologic soil group— or'-o-C-mac teslink-dare,C no A' 2'ioo( u�i1 " /''fd/dam �//�� Average percent T/� 4c-eil�`r1,4r type and hydrologic condition impervious area2 A B C D %5 •` �% Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established) Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, • etc.)3: Poor condition (grass cover e 50%) 68 © 86 Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%) 49 69 79 84 Good condition (grass cover > 75%) 39 61 74 80 Impervious areas: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 Streets and roads: • • Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right-of-way) 98 98 98 98 • Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) 83 89 92 93 Gravel (including right-of-way) 76 85 89 91 • Dirt (including right-of-way) 72 82 87 89 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only)^... 63 77 85 88 Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2-inch sand H l or gravel mulch and basin borders). 96 96 96 96 'I Urban districts: Ii; Commercial and business 85 /* 89 92 94 95 Industrial 72 -ft' 81 88 91 93 I',,.'. Residential districts by average lot size: <c It 1/8 acre or less (town houses) 65-• G. 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre 38 61 75 83 87 !.`. 1/3 acre 30 57 72 81 86 1/2 acre 25 54 70 80 85 • 1 acre 20 51 68 79 84 2 acres 12 46 65 77 82 • Developing urban areas • Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation)a 77 86 91 94 1 .. Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2c). 'Average runoff condition, and L, = 0.2S. • 'The average percent impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions are as follows: nn per'ions areas are directly connected to Lhe drainage system, impery inns areas have a CN of 98, and-pervious areas are considered equivalent to open space in good hydrologic condition. CN's for other co nibinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4. 1CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture. Composite CN's may be computed for other co nib inn Lions of open space cover type. ^Composite CN's for natural desert landscaping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage(CN = 98)and Lhe pervious area CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert shrub in poor hydrologic condition. 5Cnntpusile CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading:nal construction should be computed using figure 2-3 or 2.4, based on the degree of development(impervious area percentage)and the CN's for the newly graded pervious areas. • shed— /2 ofi3 ; ,, (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) 2-5 • • Input requirements and procedures Estimating Vs Use worksheet 6a to estimate Vs, storage volume - Use figure 6-1 to estimate storage volume (Vs) required, by the following procedure. required or peak outflow discharge (q0). The most frequent application is to estimate Vs, for which the 1. Determine q0. Many factors may dictate the _ required inputs are runoff volume (Vs), go, and peak selection of peak outflow discharge. The most inflow discharge (cg). To estimate go, the required common is to limit downstream discharges to a - inputs are Vr, Vs, and q;. desired level, such as predevelopment discharge. Another factor may be that the outflow device has already been selected. 2. Estimate qi by procedures in chapters 4 or 5. Do not use peak discharges developed by any other procedure. When using the Tabular Hydrograph method to estimate gifor a subarea; only use .6 ijIuii! � ■■ ■■■_ = 4 C■■ . _. ■1 ■ ■ ■■■. ■■ ■■■.. ■■■ �\ -�� Types Ii' a 111000E EC■C�■■■■ 11111 11.E 111 �� _111111111 _ CC - 3 ■ ■ _■■ ■ __I 1_■■■■■■■■■ . .2 Types1111 IB�I�i'.111111 C.... CE•-1111 III�s�1� �11111n;: .1 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 Peak outflow discharge �go� Peak inflow discharge q • J Figure 6•I.—Approximate detention basin routing for rainfall types I, IA, II, and III. / 6-2 (210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986) S /3 of/� REPORT OF A GEOTECHN ICAL INVESTIGATION FOR ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. LONGMONT, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 1070-L-86 N .C.M. CHURCH FRONTAGE ROAD AT DEL CAMINO WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 1242 Bramwood Pl . , P.O. Box 1135 Longmont, Colorado 80501 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Report 1 Appendix A A-1 Test Boring Location Plan A-2 Key to Borings A-3 Log of Borings A-4 Appendix B B-1 Consolidation Test Results . . . B-2 Summary of Test Results B-5 Appendix C C-1 Appendix D D-1 Soils Map D-2 Soils Description D-3 Empire Laboratories, Inc. P.O.Box 503 • (303)484-0359 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes • Fort Collins,Colorado 80522 November 19, 1986 Rocky Mountain Consultants 500 Coffman Longmont, Colorado 80501 Attention: Mr. Ken Dell Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit our Report of a Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed N.C.M. church located on the east frontage road of I-25 at Del Camino in Weld County, Colorado. Based upon our findings in the subsurface, we feel that the site is suitable for the proposed construction, providing the design criteria and recommendations set forth in this report are met. The accompanying report presents our findings in the subsurface and our recommendations based upon these findings. Very truly yours, "0088888/tfrl� AN�0 ea W-fl lc, i EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. ��`c "PRO J. -''etesS azt.tey. 470-tee, v � 15116 „-atr= .0: :�� Edward J. Paas, P.E. : ;,vw$ Branch Manager G'04u ell;..••...•••.TQ` ifry,40N PA- Reviewed by: liA'?/ heATh 1�✓tIO N . She d Senior Engineering Geologist :,/ 'I 'l t Aflame . I cic 6oRR__A. �% \4\ Branch ORces Au/ m� P.O.Box 1135 P.O.Bon 1744 P.O.Box 10076 I,y I Longmont,Colorado 80502 Greeley,Colorado 80632 Cheyenne,Wyoming 82003 ''\\\ 12/ (303)776-3921 - (303)351-0460 (307)632-9224 ti L - Member of Consulting Engineers Cau ncil "._ II REPORT OF A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION SCOPE This report presents the results of a Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed N .C.M. Church to be located on Frontage Road at Del Camino in Weld County, Colorado. The investigation was carried out by means of test borings and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these borings. SITE INVESTIGATION The field investigation, carried out on November 11th & 13th, 1986, consisted of drilling, logging and sampling nine (9) test borings. The locations of the test borings are shown on the Test Boring Location Plan included in Appendix A of this report. Boring logs prepared from the field logs are also presented in Appendix A. These logs illustrate the soils encountered, depth of sampling and elevations of subsurface groundwater at the time of the investigation. All borings were advanced with four-inch diameter, continuous-type, power-flight auger. The test borings were drilled to depths of fifteen ( 15) to thirty (30) feet. The drilling operations were performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer from Empire Laboratories, Inc. , who made a continuous visual observation of the soils encountered. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION This site is located on the east side of Frontage Road, north of Weld County Road 24 and south of Weld County Road 24i in Weld County, Colorado. ( 1) More particularly, this site may be described as a portion of the Kahn Subdivision and is situated in the southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 2 north, Range 68 west of the Sixth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The site is a open harvested corn field. The property is bordered on the west by Frontage Road, on the north by Weld County Road 24} and on the east and south by agricultural land. Rural Ditch transverses the south end of this property in an east-west direction. This site slopes gently down- ward to the north and exhibits poor drainage toward the north. LABORATORY TESTS AND EXAMINATIONS Laboratory testing and examination were performed on samples obtained from the test borings in order to determine the physical characteristics of the soils encountered. Moisture contents, dry unit weights, unconfined compressive strengths, water soluble sulfates, swelling potentials and Atterberg limits were determined. A summary of the test results is included in Appendix B. Consolidation characteristics were also determined, and curves showing this data are also included in Appendix B . SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The soil profile at the site consists of strata of materials arranged in different combinations. In order of increasing depth, they are as follows: ( 1) Topsoil : The site is overlain by a layer of silty topsoil approximately six (6) to twelve ( 12) inches thick. The upper four (4) to six (6) inches of topsoil has been penetrated by root growth and organic matter and should not be used as backfill or foundation bearing. (2) Silty Clay : Dark brown silty clay grading to sandy silty clay underlies the topsoil and extends to the underlying clayey sand (2) or sand and gravel at depths ranging from two (2) to five (5) feet. This clay stratum exhibits low bearing characteristics. (3) Clayey Sand: Light brown clayey sand underlies the clay stratum and extends to the underlying sand or sand and gravel at depths ranging from five (5) to six (6) feet. This stratum has low bearing characteristics. (4) Sand : Light brown sand exists in Borings 1 and 3 between the clay and sand and gravel stratum at depths of five (5) to nine (9) feet. This stratum is saturated and exhibits moderate bearing characteristics and moderate shear strengths. (5) Sand and Gravel : Sand and gravel containing some cobbles under- lies the sand or clay strata and extends to the underlying bedrock at depths ranging from nineteen ( 19) to twenty-one (21) feet. The sand and gravel stratum is well graded and saturated. This stratum has moderate bearing characteristics and moderate shear strengths. (6) Siltstone Claystone Bedrock : Siltstone claystone bedrock underlies the sand and gravel stratum and extends to the depths explored. The upper one-half ( 1 /2) to two (2) feet of bedrock is weathered. The firm bedrock exhibits high bearing characteristics. (7) Groundwater: At the time of our investigation, free groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from two (2) to three (3) feet. Water levels in this area are subject to change due to seasonal variations and irrigation demands. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION It is our understanding that a two-story church with slab on grade construction will be constructed on this site. The proposed loads and the finished floor elevations were not known at the time of our investigation. ( 3) Geology The proposed site is located within the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains physiographic province. The Colorado Piedmont, formed during Late Tertiary and Early Quaternary time (approximately sixty-five million (65, 000, 000) years ago) , is a broad, erosional trench which separates the Southern Rocky Mountains from the High Plains. Structurally, the property lies along the western flank of the Denver Basin. During the Late Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic Periods (approximately seventy million (70, 000, 000) years ago) , intense tectonic activity occured, causing the uplifting of the Front Range and the associated downwarping of the Denver Basin to the east. Relatively flat uplands and broad valleys characterize the present-day topography of the Colorado Piedmont in this region. The site is overlain by alluvial deposits of Modern Time. The alluvial deposits are underlain by siltstones and claystones of either the Pierre, Laramie or Fox Hills Formations. The contact of these three formations underlie the site. No bedrock outcrops were encountered at the site, and the bedrock was encountered below the alluvial gravels at depths ranging from nineteen ( 19) to twenty-one (21) feet below the surface. The regional dip of the bedrock in this area is anticipated to be relatively flat and in an easterly direction. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low; therefore, from a structural standpoint, the site should be relatively stable. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards due to mass movement, such as landslides, mudflows, etc. , are not anticipated. With proper site grading around the structures and adequate drainage for streets and paved areas, erosional problems should also be minimal. The property lies within the drainage basin of,:the St. Vrain Creek but according to Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. , does not lie within the one hundred ( 100) year floor plain of the creek. (u) L_ Therefore, the site should not be subject to extensive flooding by St. Vrain Creek. The property is underlain by a layer of sand and gravel . Approximately three (3) to five (5) feet of overburden material overlies the gravel, and the gravel layer extends to the bedrock below at depths of nineteen ( 19) to twenty- one (21) feet. In general, the sand and gravel material encountered consists of hard, durable fragments suitable for use in construction materials. Geologic conditions at the site are such that, in our opinion, the site is not underlain at economic depths by coal, limestone or quarry rock. Radiation hazards at the site may be higher than normal rates in the area due to the fact that the site is underlain by sand and gravels. The sand and gravel is composed of igneous and metamorphic rocks derived from the mountains to the west and may contain uranium-related minerals. A detail study of radon gas or radiation hazards at the site is beyond the scope of this report. It is suggested that a more detailed study be made prior to construction to more accurately determine radiation hazards at the site and make recommen- dations regarding remedial actions if needed. Site Grading & Utilities It is recommended that the topsoil containing roots and organic matter, which extends to a depth of approximately four (4) to six ( 6) inches, be removed from the area of the proposed building. This topsoil should be stockpiled for future landscaping use. The subgrade should then be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted at or near optimum moisture to ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) On-site soils or granular soils approved by the geotechnical engineer are suitable for use as fill in the proposed building area. All fill underlying (5) building and pavement areas should be placed in layers not exceeding eight ( 8) inches in thickness and compacted at or near optimum moisture to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. In computing earthwork quantities, an estimated shrinkage factor of eighteen percent ( 18%) to twenty-three percent (23%) may be used for the on-site clays compacted to the above-recommended density. A shrinkage factor of fifteen percent (15%) to twenty percent (20%) may be used for the on-site sand used as compacted fill . Utility trenches dug four (4) feet or more into the upper subsoils should be excavated on safe slopes. All piping should be adequately bedded for proper load distribution. Backfill placed in utility trenches in open and planted areas should be compacted in uniform lifts at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78 the full depth of the trench. Backfill placed in utility trenches under building and paved areas should be compacted at or near optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Addition of moisture and/or drying of the subsoils may be needed for proper compaction. All fill should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer and field density tests should be taken under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer to verify that the specified compaction requirements are attained in the field. Foundations Based on the low bearing characteristics of the soils at this site and the anticipated loads transmitted by the structure, it is our opinion that this structure should be supported by a drilled pier foundation system. It is (6) recommended that piers be drilled into the bedrock stratum and that structural grade beams span the piers. These piers would support the structure through friction and end bearing. It is recommended that the piers be straight-shaft. They should be drilled a minimum depth of three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum and when founded at this level may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of thirty-five thousand (35, 000) pounds per square foot. It is estimated that a skin friction of three thousand five hundred (3, 500) pounds per square foot will be developed for that portion of the pier embedded more than three (3) feet into the firm bedrock stratum. We recommend that piers be designed for a minimum dead load pressure of five thousand (5, 000) pounds per square foot to counteract the swelling pressure which will develop if the bedrock becomes wetted. Skin friction from additional embeddment into the firm bedrock may be used to resist uplift if necessary. All piers should be reinforced for their full length to resist tensile stress created by swelling pressures acting on the pier. Temporary casing will be required for the piers to prevent sloughing of the granular overburden materials and to permit dewatering prior to place- ment of the concrete. It is recommended that piers be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches in diameter to facilitate cleaning, dewatering and inspection. It is strongly recommended that the geotechnical engineer be present during the drilling operations to: 1) identify the firm bedrock stratum, 2) assure that proper penetration into sound bedrock is obtained, 3) ascertain that all drill holes are thoroughly cleaned and dewatered prior to placement of any foundation concrete, 4) check all drill holes to assure that they are plumb and of the proper diameter, and 5) insure proper placement of concrete and reinforcement. (7) A feasible foundation alternative for this site would be to support the structure by conventional-type spread footings. Footings should bear on undisturbed, natural soil and all exterior footings should be placed a minimum depth of thirty (30) inches below grade for frost protection. Foundations placed as recommended above may be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of one thousand two hundred and fifty ( 1, 250) pounds per square foot (dead load plus maximum live load. ) We anticipate that total settlement under the above-recommended maximum bearing pressure, as determined by laboratory consolidation tests, should be less than one (I) inch, generally considered to be within an acceptable tolerance for this type of structure. Basements, Garden Levels & Slabs on Grade Basement and garden level construction are not recommended on this site due to the high groundwater level. The subgrade beneath slabs on grade should be prepared as described in the "Site Grading" section of this report. We recommend that the floor slabs be placed a minimum of three (3) feet above the maximum seasonal high water table unless a complete dewatering system is installed. It is recommended that a four (4) inch layer of clean gravel or crushed rock devoid of fines be placed beneath floor slabs. This material will help to distribute the floor loads and will act as a capillary break. The building should be provided with permanent heat prior to pouring any interior slabs or have an ambient temperature of forty degrees (400) Fahrenheit. All slabs on grade should be designed for the imposed loading. In order to minimize and control shrinkage cracks which develop in slabs on grade, it is suggested that control joints be placed every fifteen ( 15) to twenty (20) feet and that the total area contained within these joints be no greater than four hundred (400) square feet. (8) Dewatering Free groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from two (2) to three (3) feet at the time of our investigation. If floor slabs are constructed within three (3) feet of the maximum seasonal high water table it is recommended that the structure be constructed with a complete dewatering system. If a dewatering system is installed eight (8) inches of clean gravel or crushed rock devoid of fines is recommended beneath floor slabs to facilitate dewatering. A four (4) inch perforated plastic pipe perimeter drain with a minimum grade of one-eighth ( 1 /8) inch per foot is recommended for the perimeter dewatering system. These drains must be placed at the minimum depth equal to the footing level . Two (2) inches of 3/4 inch crushed rock should extend below the pipe. This gravel should extend to within one ( 1) foot of the ground surface. It is recommended that building paper or straw be placed over the gravel to prevent clogging of the gravel media. Clay backfill should be used over the building paper to prevent surface water from entering the system. Interior drain laterals are recommended at thirty (30) foot centers. The drains should flow to a sump or by gravity to a suitable discharge area. The sump, if used, should be at least three (3) feet below the finished floor system and should have at least one ( 1) foot of gravel around and below the sump. A pump adequate to discharge flows should be installed in the sump. Pavement It is recommended that pavement be placed a minimum of three (3) feet above the maximum seasonal high water table. Samples of the upper soils were classified for the purpose of determining pavement design criteria. The soils tested for Atterberg limits had group indecies of twenty (20) to twenty-eight (28) . Based on these values, we recommend the following pavement thicknesses: (9) Drives E Areas Parking Receiving Truck Traffic Select Subbase 6" 8" Select Gravel Base Course 4" 6" Asphaltic Concrete 2z" 3" Total Pavement Thickness 12 " 17" All topsoil and other unsuitable materials should be stripped and removed from the proposed paving areas prior to placing any fill materials or base course. The subgrade should then be scarified to a depth of six (6) inches and recompacted at or near optimum moisture to ninety percent (90%) of Standar Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C.) We recommend that a soil sterilant be used beneath pavement to retard weed growth. The subbase and base course overlying the subgrade should consist of a hard, durable, crushed rock or stone and filler and the subbase should have a minimum "R" value of 70. The crushed aggregate base course should have a minimum "R" value of 80. The composite subbase and base course material should be free from vegetable matter and lumps or balls of clay, and should meet Colorado Department of Highway Class 6 specifications as follows: Sieve Size % Passing 3/4" 100 #4 30-65 #8 25-55 #200 3-12 Liquid Limit 30 Maximum Plasticity Index 6 Maximum The base course and any fill required beneath pavement areas should be placed at or near optimum moisture and compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. The base course must be shaped to grade so that proper drainage of the parking area is obtained. ( 10) GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ( 1) Laboratory test results indicated that water soluble sulfates in the soil are negligible, and a Type I cement may be used in all concrete exposed to subsoils. All slabs on grade subjected to de-icing chemicals should be composed of a more durable concrete, using Type II cement, with low water-cement ratios and higher air contents. (2) Finished grade should be sloped away from the structure on all sides to give positive drainage. Ten percent ( 10%) for the first ten ( 10) feet away from the structure is the suggested slope. (3) Backfill around the outside perimeter of the structure should be mechanically compacted at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. (4) All plumbing and utility trenches underlying slabs and paved areas should be backfilled with an approved material compacted to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Puddling should not be permitted as a method of compaction. (5) Gutters and downspouts should be designed to carry roof runoff water well beyond the backfill area. (6) Underground sprinkling systems should not be installed within ten ( 10) feet of the structure, and this recommendation should be taken into account in the landscape planning. (7) Footing or pier sizes should be proportioned to equalize the unit loads applied to the soil and thus minimize differential settlements. (8) It is recommended that all compaction requirements specified herein ( 11) be verified in the field with density tests performed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer. (9) It is recommended that a registered professional engineer design the substructure and that he take into account the findings and recommendations of this report. GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of the property and to assist the architect and/or engineer in the design of this project. In the event that any changes in the design of the structure or its location are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will not be considered valid unless said changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by Empire Laboratories, Inc. , the geotechnical engineer of record. Every effort was made to provide comprehensive site coverage through careful locations of the test borings, while keeping the site investigation economically feasible. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions between test borings may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the reported subsurface conditions and the actual conditions encountered during construction and to aid in carrying out the plans and specifications as originally contemplated, it is recommended that Empire Laboratories, Inc. be retained to perform continuous review during the excavation and foundation phases of the work. Empire Laboratories, Inc. , assumes no responsibility for compliance with the recommendations included in this report unless they have been retained to perform adequate on-site construction review during the course of construction. ( 12) APPENDIX A. TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN _ AMP GEOLOGIC MA? FORTH. . Oa. \ . SCALE : 1" = 200' I FfZONTAGTE NO. H -� IeoAP T ty_ / OFO5EPFARvJ;c,r/ I NO NO.5 .'• PROPOSP CUURCI++ mo. a 1 NO.7 °- N�4 670, NO. G .` N0.3 \\I / PQOPOS<:P PARKIN-I 7 \ epi-NO, 9 TE3f-1- TOP or I RR I G-A,TIO I-1 OUTLET As5UME ELEVAYION = '100. 0' _Qa — MOLT RN ALLUVIUM , A-2 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. KEY TO BORING LOGS 'r*// TOPSOIL •' GRAVEL i FILL SAND & GRAVEL • SILT • /y SILTY SAND & GRAVEL / ., //1 CLAYEY SILT o oa COBBLES SANDY SILT -'a � •� SAND,GRAVEL & COBBLES CLAY WEATHERED BEDROCK SILTY CLAY __ SILTSTONE BEDROCK SANDY CLAY CLAYSTONE BEDROCK SAND • • • SANDSTONE BEDROCK • •� • SILTY SAND III LIMESTONE I I �• CLAYEY SAND Pc J. Xx GRANITE SANDY SILTY CLAY 1 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER WATER TABLE 48 hrs. AFTER DRILLING C HOLE CAVED 5/12 Indicates that 5 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 Inches was required to penetrate 12 inches. A-3 k,I EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. I LOG OF BORINGS ML-VATlcN No. 1 NO 2. NO.3 NOA- 95 ".7"--7.f,2 123/12 =�� /7�� f' 1` 7•7 7/. Q , ./ - 1 5/12 3/12 • ,1 90 5/12 5/I2`--‹ : J.f _ I r • • • . , o 40/12 4: •• 23/12 38/12jT••: •.• _ 0 38/12 Y •• • • • 85 I ,• v.-...•e• . t••I S••• O.p • •1 • •.••• ••• •• • •�� • • • • .,. •. . - I . 7 r T 18/12 j •• 45/12 ' ... •,. ,, — _ 9.,.... 31 12 :f•- J • J • •••. • ••.. •e• f• r, O f •Y • 50/12 •• 28/12 75 � �� :o - • W== 50/7 ,� -- 40/12 -I_ 70 q-- —__ 50/5 _ 50/5 ._I=__-_-_b5 Note: TOM based on an ass-unied elevation of 100 feet for the top of concrete irrigation outlet pipe at N.W. property corner of existing house. A-4 ,-,..... - • EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. LOG OF BORINGS �LEvp.�TION N05 NO.G NO.7 NOe 95 • 1 r r 4 V z , - 2,11 3/12 90 8/12 5/12 % • , p j �_ 36/12 35/12 • 19/12 I. :. • • 85 v. v • . v v P • ° 35/12 �'_Y,, •80 42/12 �.' 50/12 m 9 . v 75 50/10 70 50/5 A-5 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. LOG OF BORINGS LEVATIOM MO 9 95 3/12 7„ _ 4 90 A-6 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. APPENDIX B. CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST BORING NO. 3 DEPTH 3.0 DRY DENSITY 99.7 PCF % MOISTURE 24.8% .62 .60 Er 2 .58 a 0 o .56 .54 .52 .50 0.1 0.5 1.0 S 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-TONS/SQ. FT. 0 J 2 4 1- 6 8 • 0.1 0.s 1.0 5 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-TONS/SQ. FT. B-2 • EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST BORING NO. 5 DEPTH 3 •0 f ' . DRY DENSITY 108.1 PCF % MOISTURE 22• 3% . 55 _ , o . 53 . . . - - 0 o .51 , .-----------:".................„...:Ns.:N . I 0 4 4 .47 , s - - 0.1 0.3 1.0 3 10 APPLIED PRESSURE—TONS/SQ. FT. X 2 , . _ , , - K g4 , . . ._ - , 0 0 0.1 0.s 1.0 s 10 APPLIED PRESSURE—TONS/SQ. FT, 0-3 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. CONSOLIDATION--SWELL TEST BORING NO. 7 DEPTH 1 0 . .56 DRY DENSITY 104.2 PCF % MOISTURE 22.4% .54 .52 o .50 0 o .4C .46 .44 . — .42 . 0.1 0.5 1.0 5 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-TONS/SQ. FT. 0 2 g4 6 • 0.1 0.5 1.0 5 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-TONS/SQ. FT. 6-4 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. ._ ..1 ('l C .. CJ CJ CV CJ r O r � r t---- in r- IT COLO OOC �CCwC COLOC N L n CO .') LC) O CO <I- d' V- L n O CO O O O CO CO L!) CO O CO 10 N a m CO TO N LO 'CC r V-r LO LO LO N d- N at Cr) V CL ≥9 &_ cro c 0'OU =N •-N 4 2 U a x J d 0a C T x_ an t 6 a.E.. o ;e (n J J I- -J D U LIJ Z w I N C a W H ¢ V7 - O I1 I- F n 0 0 4 IL °' u lO 0 0 K O i..1p.a¢ 0 GI r 0 Q O O O 0 CO v J v y 0 0 O di CL Q a 0 2 0 air. W D I :lino 0 N N n m '5„ O O y LL O N. U) Q T R O CO 00 U — to N N ZU. _NU CO at N O ca O) • 0 0 o— r r j t\ t\ CO CO l0 lO at at LO 00 CO OW ct 0) t- at l� CO CO LO CO N-• LC) CO G aca— 0 r•-• t.0 LO 0) LO CO CT LO d' LO COr- I- LC) 0 C 007 Od' N N C--• CO o N r N r N N r r N r N N r r r r r r r O0ct 0 OOI0 d- 000 0 LO 0 0 •• 0 0 0 •. 0• • 0 0 0 •. 0• 0 0 0 • c_ r CO CO r ON N r LO 00 r ' f- 10 CO r N N N c t LO 00 r N N d' LO CO r 0..% 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIII I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I p�. LO O O O O O LO O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O 001I---d-Old 0 ct I d' O at 1 V- O) d' 0) CO d' I d' O) d' O d' r•--- d' r r N r r r N N r r N r ti r N co d- in oZ co B-5 r I —. r— r-- ..\\ \\\\\ \\ \\ c p r-- VD LC) U) C)) O O O M U) c') M m m r- M M ,- lf) ll) 1.f) N a. ≥C? 2 CC c CD OD LO ^ N J o '.�-'in U lD w LID to Q' I` N r; U I I I Q Q Q CO ii . N10 • r— N N x LO r— ct• U0) ,.,1- M�` N to_ M co d T' •' U g. M U) .Ee 11� _ 0 JJ d� U7 un J D U N 2 W — aC a vi w (17 - O LL! - H Q O U- y : M 0 O O -5..2 ii o m } y Y • J N O cc w Q cc a m 2 m au. w D 3 to v) to `a a. d a 5— O O to ct- 01 a. m a CO in U _ r— f` c\.1 t=tt. U co r. D V o 01 O a_ on CO N lO d-.-- CV I) CO I. 01 LC) C)1 r- e aV COMCTO CV d• d'LOC0M COCOct C")'MN M N.— r- N r— CD OO1cY O O O • 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O • U) •l.C) 0) ct- c �}•U-) CO r- ch Ll7 Op r r N CO M lf) NU, a«I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 0 u_ O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on ,t n, ' on ,t n-,t 0) 'd' r- N d' r- cr r- r— N a, O lD N. CO C)1 az to 8-6 APPENDIX C. APPENDIX C. Suggested Specifications for Placement of Compacted Earth Fill and/or Backfills. GENERAL A soils engineer shall be on-site to provide continuous observation during filling and grading operations and shall be the owner's repre- sentative to inspect placement of all compacted fill and/or backfill on the project. The soils engineer shall approve all earth materials prior to their use, the methods of placing, and the degree of compaction obtained. MATERIALS Soils used for all compacted fill and backfill shall be approved by the soils engineer prior to their use. The upper two (2) feet of compacted earth backfill placed adjacent to exterior foundation walls shall be an impervious, nonexpansive material . No material , including rock, having a maximum dimension greater than six inches shall be placed in any fill . Any fill containing rock should be carefully mixed to avoid nesting and creation of voids. In no case shall frozen material be used as a fill and/or backfill material . PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE All topsoil , vegetation (including trees and brush), timber, debris , rubbish, and other unsuitable material shall be removed to a depth satisfactory to the soils engineer and disposed of by suitable means before beginning preparation of the subgrade. The subgrade surface of the area to be filled shall be scarified a minimum depth of s.ix inches, moistened as necessary, and compacted in a manner specified below for the subsequent layers of fill . Fill shall not be placed on frozen or muddy ground. C-2 PLACING FILL No sod, brush, frozen or thawing material , or other unsuitable material shall be placed in the fill , and no fill shall be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. All clods shall be broken into small pieces , and distribution of material in the fill shall be such as to preclude the formation of lenses of material differing from the surrounding material . The materials shall be delivered to and spread on the fill surface in a manner which will result in a uniformly compacted fill . Each layer shall be thoroughly blade mixed during spreading to insure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. Prior to compacting, each layer shall have a maximum thickness of eight inches , and its upper surface shall be approximately horizontal . Each successive 6" to 8" lift of fill being placed on slopes or hillsides should be benched into the existing slopes , providing good bond between the fill and existing ground. MOISTURE CONTROL While being compacted, the fill material in each layer- shall as nearly as practical contain the amount of moisture required for optimum compaction or as specified, and the moisture shall be uniform throughout the fill . The contractor may be required to add necessary moisture to the fill material and to uniformly mix the water with the fill material if, in the opinion of the soils engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. If, in the opinion of the soils engineer, the material proposed for use in the compacted fill is too wet to permit adequate compaction, it shall be dried in an acceptable manner prior to placement and compaction. COMPACTION When an acceptable, uniform moisture content is obtained, each layer shall be compacted by a method acceptable to the soils engineer and as specified in the foregoing report as determined by applicable standards. Compaction shall be performed by rolling with approved tamping rollers, C-3 pneumatic-tired rollers, three-wheel power rollers, vibratory compactors , or other approved equipment well-suited to the soil being compacted. If a sheepfoot roller is used, it shall be provided with cleaner bars attached in a manner which will prevent the accumulation of material between the tamper feet. The rollers should be designed so that effective weight can be increased. MOISTURE-DENSITY DETERMINATION Samples of representative fill materials to be placed shall be furnished by the contractor to the soils engineer for determination of maximum density and optimum moisture or percent of Relative Density for these materials. Tests for this determination will be made using methods conforming to requirements of ASTM D 698, ASTM D 1557, or ASTM D 2049. Copies of the results of these tests will be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor. These test results shall be the basis of control for all compaction effort. DENSITY TESTS The density and moisture content of each layer of compacted fill will be determined by the soils engineer in accordance with ASTM D 1556, ASTM D 2167, or ASTM D 2922. Any material found not to comply with the minimum specified density shall be recompacted until the required density is obtained. Sufficient density tests shall be made and submitted to support the soils engineer' s recommendations. The results of density tests will also be furnished to the owner, the project engineer, and the contractor by the soils engineer. C-4 D-1 SOIL MAP NORTF °— 3 I scaLE: : 1" =200' 1 FRONTAGE NO. s " ROAD 1 ii\/ /PROPOSED PARICINC'c ' NO. NO.5 PROPOSWD CPURCI-1 + NO. 2 NO.7 N0.4\\II 3 NO. 6 a N0.3_ ZPfZOPO9M2 PARKING- 7%\ NO. 9 tSM- TOP or IRRIGATION ourLrT ASSUME: tLE YA-I"ION = 100. 0 LEGEND 3- AQUOLLS Anlo AQUENTS D-2 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. SOILS DESCRIPTION 3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about GO percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 percent is Aquents and Bankard sandy loam. These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the underlying material. Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in sonic years. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, sedge, and fish increase. Management of vegetation should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed preparation usually requires more than 1 year to eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and openland wildlife. Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some areas. These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by livestock. They should not be drained. These soils have good potential as a source of sand and gravel. Capability subclass Vlw; Salt Meadow range site. D-3 l ` �.,.Lt '� x ; Jk�4 i r N. ,' f� �` 1Af E`E't'�Ic. n(R Y i . ,,,,, , „,,, ,,,,, . , ,, ,,,,,,,.., , .: , _ �I1�. , . _ ,, f„„ . . y„4'y sr nn k 4, +'fit g N b" v r -'i?:4 1, _ M,i"i'. Y � c • n.Jvr, Y7,t' 6.�!�k7(1�:k fL2 f in 5-nor •,'.,' By JONI! � lid trlaea,Y as Hell Si tiyiandYttoom T ,,.. �.TIP,* orado 111199.. ` you're � Two of the to devel- out „ Ifs era- t to his owledge, 9 and sewers , there has- never 11 testy die- ice and seo en- teskto•of a separaate emel mu- dve palge, — 'Sear about to ifs ddpelity toleingmont'll east. removed, , While the special tation dia- Thblti has been seder teietns is _exclusively what Nels.n Crowell, chairmen of fit Mending. ,Weld LattiOnrs US Range Pltailline eiritt has asked theiclisttlet to d'the bfrik of consider the poeeibll*011311,04- a city"tn'i p all on ofthatpg5* tilt ether urban—here! settees, ble devehmment. on 'Ihursday,at- lids as roads,Grant said. s ''HeBed that in years peak,pr'op years, we'•ve been treating trey elites Wile ar+entriedto rad- ars away " e It Osallggee foie their Plans, but v+ � Ott oessfdly'" Even se, lie'said, at- unot a , . havebeenmadeta=pleathe t ° that•the eity;of 0 Dr eamt:et lion ,: I. would pot 1_ froth I�ty er , ° ld'in die . °"It's; be Atone Graet`attd;the city the car a !,l,' ' of,. . and,�' said, '1b were be duly ! to object to help Its^ 40'the east- t the sanitation,disG$M. :at a sign )plenaryy as the WeleVounty hearing. But he irdi- area develepe,'"Wa R0 our cote*- cated that cooperation has tm- tale,, , , proved under DelVecchlo. and Earlier a=weea, the' Wald Larry Green,Longmadt's commu- County Gaol gyve l'pte- nity:development director. &nanry 'in ,Long ent'sr snnina is con- that unity Bhut ducting 8 special study:about the that,projsct s hits*' i ^`ef impact tha poñia1growth In the industrial, soitioretil and ` - Del Caudno area wosdd have on the dentist sses=iti to 0,'OOlecre area city. near thetDel Ciabirte.intersecitin Lhugiraitge conninnaener d Iaaaslble"91► old Celtrado ILO. Until now, mat of that aria:has o Herslepmabt Assecia- been deBgoat}d:amt zoned Eon Ps- rnm&Longmont,ernpliasiedtirat etrasang tixcshtly analyse WhiltdortIgotorttiesartban rtbbt in Inn- al the that akatg'IMerstbte !L ant the state mss. might Ant.`on teat moat'soomersanowla Lona-range planner Brian Miller ;e . t �� . .1de,said r =Y 4 ' they resemble"; that ,, absat v sm bs �.� 1.... a; 1. . ».. PaieaS' , kart,aid* in Long- city sillies, ate noses" rail", ' ns ng . � a death to theurged city to mink U ld to ."p M, Grant predicted ',actin' . m Mee de to opment to continue in the Del Cam- Longmont. 6.700:i i t, a .^ r,r.ffr,T,:� ...k!".,.:>l ,� k'. '�•,C.v.! R °.'i ,w, .•,r,{.'PAwv ,. .. M rF.Jdx3 a*,fv. .uh. 42 44.' . g " Y!. ...r.d..it°'Y, .ic'. wt!.'.Jr,} „ +5' 4 a . .F"aw+', u1 ,yw:.w. 5 N ti o Q 10•• ;7-- 4 a ro ° 5 :r m o low '- o o a a w 3' a 5 w d " 3 •— :; w " c o C 'a a a D' •~ .. cr - 7 , o co• , " m n „ r) r- w w. ,, C M E"' 7 0 F w rD n 7, " n OU G- 7 7- C 5. 7 _Q O w rc rc 7 :3 '. rD -' " 'Z7 7 5 W 0., ^ .+ o 2 „Ern OA a_ ° P 0 CL td "1 - C aIe`D �. 'I ^, m 7 c a ' (n ' " a a w 7 a u s s w " v r �'" .�-- fJ p rp 7 G N rp 7 . ., a '7 ti n r c ,- ^J O' rD ;:e ,. r C. �', r^ .-I J i - 7 t• n aL C. �• _ h ; " 00 7 rD °. H in M- J G t i O C 'r I/ 7 :3 r '• ' t. rD 07 S O r• ,roo O ° ti t rn O Y W r -�. r., U •n o- l ,n .^T ,. r r rD r'^ ^ r. (' rD :J rn a ff F; ._, .1 D OO r rD �. co L P' i - ° !. 7 7 IA 4 O, 'O .; 'U _ ' 0 CL .� tr 4 r.O 0 a ° O' G P: p .+ a w ril Cy n O " 0 -, n G G rD •,nay G 7� m c -.. _ Y o O a w r, ° p' 7 n 3 ti: . O ^ , � „ 0 N ri ,„-: G coo G fir' 7 7 'ov: tia ° " ti a' bra : , ti' ww On ' wP;, 0u a ' a .-' O � o ,1 r ...., a O O 7 0n n 7 C a F m 7 •; .., rO .-r .., •. 7 0-. '^ • 7 Ur', ,j G w 3 C w co " `. a •,- N ro O a ^�i E ° z ° o w a y ¢ m r w G. �, ti a " w o u) w _ a m r c' „ o ti roci) r' w• "` p G y -'� o'� a CO a. �' �. N 0 X :0 _N N " G 7 7 in w a O f - 7 7 a "y� .-. " S "' G " ,•f f+ _ w p' ..', 7 w 7' R. O a •,--. C C 1 7 7 << d n a w O N Pi 0 P-0 'U N O' •- N °., _- 5 O •-f 07w O rD " :� ° a a 0 w " (.7 w w p"' 0 0 Q- n 0- p o w Y a t X C rD w n 7• r a_ 7 rD a - w ' " b' _a .� a p. a- Ci O a r, 0 7 p w G ° ^t °cl ,7 rD O w w 7 r ;r ru rt a CD w .,, n 0. $ 0 a " 7 L ° �'' rD _ H ^.- . w -1 n . v: y .i 2 r:. y ., v r 0 7 C• '1 O n o c w .-. `. 3 VI , rr O4,, a D., in o- O CY `. 0 w ; 7 ? i' • a ',7-1 -•c -- < a' w -y Rf Y. ° .+W t O_ a ::- R. O tw O ° rD 0. y O CJ .G-. rD ..• a "rl'I a• 1, ry 7. [D w rn rD N ro of V: .1 : N p 3 v`: 7 n O 7 7' 0 °O "." 'y •`z_ a O ..,-•. . rD " Cad 7 w �i P M rrDD r, 0 O v, c ci •-w•, rr r v0. 0 " S rD OJ 0. 0 3 0 ro;, " " Cn w y ,-, - ].. w 3 N `C r' 7' co a' o O ,�, �' ' - ,-3a , CDo � Y� ' ca < a. ww " ° rn • Yx r oGasr) -" oG. ... _ c , -, 7- G `o s CS' ma' c7, w - n �' -, •, w-p. a w S .- w Co �C c p, o .1 a ro � p J a'" ;n c G ° cr a ° cra TaG o rD s r a0 <' - '? • p h G .� ] C. " a 0 _ O _ 7 `� 0 a r'yD ° n " Or' E) O " '� �. ^ w p ^. S - o 7_,.- rD w M ? G Con rD ' ° rD a -•, , 3 .... 0 c " o r O Di L' S O" a, r C n a O' _ n (. 7 3 rD r, a O 'j R' .•, D a- - a .r, r7➢ �. a UJ C n 5 v. r7 ti ❑' `. 7 R W 7" Oy a ° �. 7 O rD " rp t-t CD C .-. W T .r. 5-: .- J' 7 Y a C. '.n 7 CD rD a m O 5 0 •ti . rt R. C " 'C7 n O w rD r T.' ^i -• ° rc, in rD w w7 m o '-"VI w o r-, (1) rD 5•,w 3,'1 . •:,i S. • '. t' - �C .k:�. o a rD 00 c� w 7- a s a "' v' re) p m F. ..44..46;. ? cs'D 7 p c w y O , O "r�� w gi p; S Q 7'! x 'Z ':•Y w 1.. w to "-. o' tot w r°-n a: Pi K r0D n 0 O •. ycyD C I r a rr .f w " 0 '-C !D_ C 0 `4, a x rD '- 5 ° 7, ) NI !'i" '��7r,j . ''7r( •.�fY/t . , N r'*. .17:1 ' ' 0� ° w °a S a s O' 0 v a -A r ,.e e .0 . r�--)Y - 4' �frr r�-`drl:'%r I,'p : 3 a'' " LC �- !y' ^f pO p a tt s O . p H ci "I . i f r 1 it L 2-1...4.--1 +T�s-re om'r; " w 0.'"0 0 w r'7D w rD c< G. r'T. X Oz . ' .•t. -r P'r: - W. - 7 � rD rD r G O " . 7 `G G ei �,,, tti 7t-t r �Y9A•. ,i ,+r ' t, • }!.,rn .{ v. O (D O °4 N r0n 7 � i—• .< p '7-• n Ej Y , {*. a t? '-z , r Y(t,.c,,r.�,y <r w 0- C t_G w w to w O .�' E w '-- e' b 'i a ''tl I nr i ' • oc•M ) /� /"•-iit-' .� t4 a ti b°0 7 l c" c 1 t, ! >c �f.,-i r-'Cii cm 7 O O •"-. a" x ^wi .* < 7 rro l7J ,+ N ri .o,. w - r IJ6 $ h.14 ✓ ° Q- " O f° • p, p' v o N y `C tZ/� �.`8. ,- �'`'`,( • +,, r �, •. {r��' i `r f}., -, y' ti 7' a 0. a � 0-n '� p-r td rr �. o ^ .t ; :o . & :�- a dt`r i :?1�' rid c- c .+ r7D in n O ° p w a j. td w n raD Lr _. " '^ f i ,1, ,t x .:. .. ) Yf '1 N ``'_ .n 7 y w 7 r�if " 7' a) C r.v " Oti et G'_�rD 'P--•,..,..�.....w.-•�.. �,r..rr .. o � 7 " w as p l et y O 7 h • p fp ', f r. 4^t9 :ti t - ,1 r. 1 ir• . R' N < ^ w aGq p' w m m c-ocl ti ° ° V1 m ' :! ,` f 4'-f •l.*,.F� fte p- ' Y p 9 r' wt p 7 w o ° a o O ct l' r . r t�l. rD IHil- ap7 .' rn K7 p1r " S" 1m R _ N .7+ p ro R. C�1 !J& 'Amr' o ;-Dc in is O w 7 r. O G d N .�. S, ii, dr` , ' • ° 7 w w O N '1 " S 7' " r. o Sr -+t' -^ y1 i 1 '7i —"- C3 .^O w 7 0 .f O w ,74 p' R. 0" - a rD p -. = a R -;J Ann 1I �L(I } 77 ,I9 't7 r ` ab rt � a N " rY�,, 7' in. ,... O .t ' -' � fb 1 1 y ;: d �. "it•' `' n n r+ a O w a'7 N ro 0 9 two O 7 7 o ry 00 M, 7 rte. V1 0 G_ ,+ ,c, ° "°Q N O N 1-•• S rD ' < w r, ro r. rD 7 o w y .v, 1 D' . ice' 1 ,., • ,, .. v.' CCD r°-n r4 C •-1 7 I .1 r"-. 'i 7' in tC °4 2, " A -'. 4 EXHIBIT �� ' H ' S Plans on Del Camino advance Ey JEFF THOMAS Times Call Staff Writer v Longmont City Coh'icct4Cmerttbetlgh i - decided to approach.the-promoters of a potential new city in the Del Camino area near Interstate 25 and Colorado 119 this week, but they may be getting into the game a little late. The city council learned at Its study session Tuesday that the Weld County commissioners had rejected a Longmont invitation for a discussion on Del Camino devel- opment. On Monday, the Weld County commissioners also gave final approval to a comprehensive plan amendment making way for the 7,000-acre mixed-use devel- opment. After hearing about the Weld County commissioners' reaction, the council decided to pursue a con- ference with the St. Vrain Sanita- tion District Board — the board that sought the land use changes. However, at a meeting of the St. Vra in board on Thursday, several board members indicated the council has already had its chance at cooperative planning. Board Chairman Wally Grant, a Longmont attorney,said"for prob- ably three years I kept city offi- cials aware of what's going on out there. They (the city council) haven't shown a lot of interest. "I've always suggested working together, but never had any re- sponse. Our interest is only to han- dle santitation needs. During the Weld County review process for the land-use changes, the Longmont City Council recom- mended the adoption of a 2,000- acre area for development — the smallest area under consideration, encompassing only the existing sanitation district. Since that time, the district's engineer, Vern Nel- son, said new inclusions of prop- erty have increased the size of the sanitation district to closer to 3,000 acres. The district was created in Jan- uary of last year and the bond-fi- nancing of a sewer plant was approved in an election last sum- mer. Grant said that the construc- tion plans for that plant were "moving ahead." He said initial plans detail three phases of con- ' stuction,with each phase of the fa- cility able to handle about 500,000 gallons of sewage per day — ad- equate to provide services for about 5,000 people. Grant said the sewer plant was designed to accomodate fluctuat- ing growth demands in the Inter- state 25 corrider. "We did not include in our district very much north of the St. Vrain river," he said. ' He also said that four area water companies, — Left Hand, Longs Peak,Little Thompson and Central Weld Water District—were work- ing together on a study to provide treated water to the area. l> ,ry Q0 4 e„ 4I I Ili 4d 'k n ..4,4, p19 d1�� Ck...1 4_ 7 n l,1 s /sivi ---J I It�r Y g 0 1 `1 t. jti,, 1% ..c . , u 0 r. gi1 0 ‘S\ii -‘. Y ., C p i. Y J^ O O nn 2 i '' \ lIblirilill o cp ; .. 9. �— ; I • / ot "d � a (lif t [II ' I t A, k D- a 00000�� 000 ' ty /I 4 . ' . P - "-----" 1 /s,) Met Yr . ii ‘ ' 4 a d°Y/7 4 / ,,, _ ___..:, ‘ ,, 3 .-..-----;:::::" 1 (Welfrg:. // 1/4,72, ,,,, ,„ ( Y.1 c G i • g i 4D a 1 s 3 T� / ill i. , .t ; / p 5 /v :1 \ -\ • o ,r ) a r--, S i `` Oit d U +' -z yy 1 ' < \\ it.W J f .E. a C` 1 �� \ V V ` a g Z U d \••• J M �Illl a t % noon } r11 ") al �u I 'n nn�w n u 0f w 3 �tl 4i V z. . . \ , IW \ .., IN>a. c r_ • I / ,', Ili �Yrd J y 3, \\\ Ki s, ,,, „„ , r .• ‘ \ • ‘ ,,-....... 1. -..-� Hello