The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About891158.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND P.U.D. PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public meeting on the 1st day of November, 1989, at the hour of 10 :00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First Filing and Second Filing, submitted by Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership, c/o Doug Grant, 515 Kimbark Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501 , and WHEREAS, said Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First Filing and Second Filing, concerns the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NW} of Section 11 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Donald Slack, of Slack Ellerman Architects, and WHEREAS, the Board heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in the matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28 . 9 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan application is in conformance with Section 28 . 14 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: 891158 n A/ Page 2 RE: PUD PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The PUD Plan is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. The uses proposed for the PUD Plan are consistent with the uses described in the 1-25 Mixed-Use Development Area and Activity Centers Section of the Comprehensive Plan; b. The PUD Plan conforms to the PUD District. The Utility Coordinating Advisory Committee reviewed and approved the utility plan map at its September 14 meeting; c. The application materials demonstrate that the uses allowed under the proposed PUD Plan will be compatible with existing and future development as projected by the plans of affected municipalities; d. The PUD Plan will conform with the performance standards outlined in Section 35 .3; and e. The PUD Plan is not located in an overlay district area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership for a Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First Filing and Second Filing, on the above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . Prior to recording the PUD Plan plat, the applicant shall: a . Submit an original Subdivision Improvement -Agreement and four copies to the Department of Planning Services. The agreement shall also address improvements to the east I-25 Frontage Road required by the Colorado Division of Highways. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners and collateral shall be posted by the owner or applicant. b. Submit evidence that a Law Enforcement Authority has been formed according to State law. The Law Enforcement Authority to be formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 891158 Page 3 RE; PUD PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP Mixed Use Development Area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs; c. Amend the PUD Plan application materials to comply with the general sign and identification sign requirements in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; d. Amend the PUD Plan landscape plat to show that adequate sight distance on the east I-25 Frontage Road will be protected. The landscape plat shall be approved by a representative of the Colorado Division of Highways; and e. Submit evidence to the Colorado Division of Highways and Department of Planning Services that the area for the future frontage road within the PUD District has been dedicated to the Colorado Division of Highways . f. Amend the PUD Plan plat to show: i. A design for ingress and egress from the east I-25 Frontage Road. All access points shall comply with the October 13, 1989 , letter signed by Mr. Wallace R. Jacobson, representative for the Colorado Division of Highways; ii. A 15 foot perimeter utility easement around Filings 1 and 2; iii. As a minimum, the parking space requirement of 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area plus an adequate area for tour bus parking; iv. The location of mall identification signs; and v. Dedication of additional rights-of-way, if needed, to allow for turn lane construction on the east I-25 Frontage Road. 2 . The following notes shall be placed on the PUD Plan plat: 891158 Page 4 RE: PUD PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP a. The use permitted in this PUD Plan shall be a retail shopping mall as described in the application materials and as permitted by Case Number Z-447 on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners; b. Prior to issuing building permits, approval of a site plan review on each lot is required in accordance with Section 33 . 4.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The site plan review shall comply with the PUD Plan and PUD District application materials on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners; c. Prior to issuing building permits for construction of the second filing, the future frontage road shall be constructed by the owners of the Ni of Section 11 , T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and/or via a local improvement district. The Colorado Division of Highways shall verify that the road has been constructed and approved; d. Prior to approval of a site plan review, the applicant shall amend the drainage and grading plan application materials to meet the PUD Plan requirements of Section 28. 11 .6 through 28. 11 . 14 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The amended plan shall also address note #8 of Case Z-447 . The amended plan shall comply with the Weld County Subdivision Storm Drainage Regulations listed in Section 8-11 and receive approval from the County Engineer; e. Prior to approval of a site plan review, the applicant shall submit a road improvements master plan in accordance with Note 6 of Case Z-447; f. The Commercial Zone District Performance Standards and supplementary regulations as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with; g. A Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners for the second filing prior to approving its site plan review; and 891158 Page 5 RE: PUD PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP h. The requirements of the Longmont Rural Fire Protection District and Weld County Sheriff ' s Department shall be met; and i. The shopping mall shall be allowed two free standing identification signs unless a variance is -granted by the Board of Adjustment for additional identification signs. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of November, A.D. , 1989 . tc7) �.c Li BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: J WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Board C.W irby, Chairman By /1YK-.fit ) Gene R. Bran ner, Pro-Tem Deputy County rk (�' ~ > .. JAS'{�fL' APPROVED AS TO FORM: Consta ce L. Ha Art George K� County Attorney Go . La 891158 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-42 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND P.U.D. PLAN, FIRST AND SECOND FILING - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP A public hearing was conducted on November 1, 1989, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman - Excused Commissioner Gene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem Commissioner Constance L. Harbert Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 23, 1989, and duly published August 31, 1989, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider a Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First and Second Filing, for Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. He noted that this hearing was continued to this date from October 4. Chairman Pro-Tem Brantner advised all present that three affirmative votes are necessary for approval of this request and, if a tie vote should result, the absent Commissioner would review the record and listen to the tape of this hearing prior to casting the deciding vote. Rod Allison, Planning Department representative, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record of this hearing. He stated that the Planning staff recommends two minor changes to the Conditions recommended by the Planning Commission, and he made said changes of record. Donald Slack came forward to represent the applicants. He explained that this area is to be developed into factory outlet shops. Mr. Slack said there has been considerable discussion with the Highway Department concerning the development of this area in two phases. They have agreed that the necessary realignment of the I-25 Frontage Road may be delayed until the second development phase. Wally Jacobson, of the State Highway Department, said that their letter of October 13, 1989, summarizes the main issues, and that the realignment of the frontage road should be completed prior to any development beyond the First Filing. During the discussion about the I-25 Frontage Road, Wally Grant, one of the property owners, and Jennifer Rodriguez, of Rocky Mountain Consultants, presented information. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this request, subject to the Conditions proposed by the Planning Commission and amended as recommended by the Planning staff. Commissioner Harbert seconded the motion. Mr. Allison reminded the Board that these Conditions call for the realignment of the Frontage Road prior to the issuance of building permits for the Second Filing. Mr. Allison also asked if a request to change this time schedule would be considered as a minor change to be handled by the staff or if it would require consideration by the Board. It was the consensus of the Board that this would be resolved at the time such a request is received. The motion to approve the Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First and Second Filing, carried unanimously. 891158 Page 2 RE: PUD PLAN - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP This Certification was approved on the 6th day of November, 1989. -APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �Lv " " ' ti WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Boa C.W rby, Chairman ene BY�jc7nLni c.e1 . , Deputy County Cle ene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem Constance L. Harbert Georg g} Go o c TAPE #89-45 DOCKET #89-42 PL0337 891158 PUBLIC NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on November 1, 1989, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan -and a P.U.D. Plan, First and Second Filing, for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. _APPLICANT: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership c/o Doug Grant 515 Kimbark Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part -0f the NW} of Section 11, Township 2 North, lange 68 West of the 6th P.N., -Weld County, Colorado -TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Retail shopping mall SIZE OF PARCEL: 13.7 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: J4ary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: November 9, 1989, in The New News 891158 PUBLIC NOTICE The oard of County Commissioners o of Weld Can*, Colorado, on November 1, l9N EllraDlielve a t Planved and for Plan,thet and Second 2QwwPpmoeee operty and described below. Conditional al of this creates cea a rated property rlri C.RS nathree yys amended,eed e 68ora period ears. APPLICANT: Ftfthcoff CCrtonme�p�alnny and pa C/O Doug Brothers ibarK tagety Colorado✓ 01. art el. the al n Section ge 11,Tofwnshhe hfip P NN eld:Finn West of o TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Retail shopping mall SITE OF PARCEL: 13.7 acres, more or leas Failure to abide by the terms and a forf of ans of or ththe }will result in aeiture e vested property right. BOARD M OF COUNTY WELD COUNTYCOLORADO BY: MARY ANN ifF.:EERSTEIN - RECORDER AND CLERRRK ATO -THE-BOARD BY: Mary Reiff Deputy PUBLISHED: November 9, 1909 in The New News 10-5-4,--)—r„, L" /O .±(tiddia-9(-2 c-e2,x---- - ,if-- 821159 ADDITIONAL PLAT NOTE The shopping mall shall be _allowed two free standing identification signs unless a variance is granted by the Board of Adjustment for additicnal identification signs. 891158 ATTENDANCE _t E C O R D TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: NOVEMBER 1, 1989 DOCKET #89-42 PUD PLAN, FIRST & SECOND FILING - FIFTHCOFF COMPANY AND -GRANT BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP PLEASE write Dr print legibly your- name, address and the DOC # (as listed above) or the applioanta name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING F. A I-iooscet JR. (o1ol)FPr IICJr Wall Jac' -5G'(1 Cole . Deco. I-Lw s . JExIkt V� U .'%1� 2 / t 7 11 V A LL1 & A1.► 6 ZAly� DO Rik(OLN % (,(C t€04-Tc4 tCo S9iS8 , TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AF JLLOWS: ' DOCKET #89-42 PUD PLAN, FIRST & SECOND FILING - FI-FT-HCOFF -COMPANY & GRANT -BROTHERS PARTNERSHrp DOCKET #89-45 SERVICE PLAN - LE-FT HAND WATER DISTRICT DOCKET iF89-.46 USR-ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH GROSS -FLOOR AREA 1,ARGE-R -THAN 1,300 SQUARE FEET IN AN APPROVED MD RECORDED SUBDIVISON - LARRY W. SMITH _PLEASE write or print legibly your-name, address and the toC # (as listed above) or the applicants name of the hearing _nu are attending. NAtiE ADDRESS HEA-RING ATTENDING / ir n i filI (i I I /k--� /�� _,0 ' .F7IJ9 ,C 02'/4'aTie/ /Y//O Sy-oP'!/UT' 7J.F.' /e/c r' �'i C �‘ /zs6 .O U, i1 �.�1 �� 7 c' s�� of, liC' ie---..1/4 I /1 �5 `I cu � 9 sib \ C f\ lD�. 11i I1 �� ZS-C3 k q -� J /PJ d C12 ir�Sll CEO/ Lonl 4�J0,I� GVNUI 4 0 I- V s,ft,.€yy 2, --1;w'��'/7/ —a/5{0-r�'/Tr�. J, 4r2 i/A'" � '#tf 1/ t c,_ Ys— /-1 Ws/. Pe, /n,f 07 5' A'•'we r Cs'.t . b F- ys r a te ; ..1A-4 Aril , /-�c`Lein c Icitt_ `• ` c5x -y-a,•tC<) �E? -3/ 5 • 8:91.18 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. An persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and P.B.D. -Plan -are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested Party 'desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which win be kept 'during the tearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five clays prior to the tearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text -and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third -Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 89-42 Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partner-ship c/o Doug Grant 515 Kimbark Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: October 4, 198E TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. Plan, First and Second Filing LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Fart of the NWk of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , -Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1,209 feet south ofWeld County Road 24 and east and adjacent to the I-25 Frontage Road. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK SO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: August 23, 1989 PUBLISHED: August 31, 1989, in The New News 89 $® &ck bt+ - .... the Pursuant to the and the Weld Coon Twwta Ordhiance a public esrtfyn¢ will held in the ambers s of Board of County Coo nerd of Weld County Colorado, Weld Cow Cantenniat Center, 915 10th t�yrdo, First Floorsp¢Grr1eele , Colors o, at the time interestedin the Sons in ite S cific Development Plan and t .. r.U.D. Plan ere requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party leave the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings in will to the taped record which wi ll be kept during the hearing, the Clerk lo the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of Dornag ee b rty B be BE 14 AI,SO Kcourt N�baytt the Weld Cou and nty P alarming Comudasion may be examined in the office of Um Clerk to the Board 10th Street, t�,Third Floor Greeley, DOCKET�NO.8942A .. FBrou¢�ParthenrsNP arld Grant Grant 55115xipmo�bark Street DATE: Octoberr4,19N 1 TIME::: I00::0p0 A.M.Site Specific Plena,First.Development SecanU and P.U.D. LEGAL�DESCRIPTION:11 Townsh 2 North,Ramie fib West of the'eth P.M.Weld County, p CC�oloorrta¢dloBo.. 1 200 feet south soout Weld Cou nty and adjacent to oad 24 Frontage Road. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • ppNNWELDLOR DO . BY: +MACOUNTf'CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff,Deputy DATED: August 23 1989 Published: August 31, 1989, in The New News /—•.;:->C2 /-7-(--(<5!--.---- ---z-t_../--' 891158 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA 11ON State of Colorado NOTICE County of Boulder Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colo- rado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Dean G. Lehman ,do Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 91519th Street,First I, y,Colorado,at the time specified.All Plpersons oor, o any manner inter Bated . the Site requested to Development at Pma and solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a P.U.D.Plan areSpecific a attend o t may be neartl, daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in Should the applicant on any InmNtw party desire the presence of a Court reporter to melee e the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and record of the proceedings,in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing,the which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days to Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and the hearing.The cost of engaging a caysYpriorreport- uninterruptedly m sE I ceSOne bythehat teeing p published for a period of more than six months BE IT ALSO KNOWN that requesting estingt and mps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commis next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of Bien may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, d Floor,Greeley,Colorado. United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions DOCKET Third loo APPLICANT Plfthooff Company and Grant of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof, and that Brothers Partnership c/o Doug Grant said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for 515 Kimbark rant Longmont,Colorado 00501 publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning DATE:October e,1989 of the laws of the State of Colorado;that a copy of each number of RIME: ST: A.M. TEQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and P.U.D. ESC, IPFirTIt eN:d PaSect d teN said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was Filing LEGAL DEanRIPsIOn: Pmt of the NWVw of published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of theSection 11,Township 2 North,Range 68 West the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado Approximately ad east and south of subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed Weld LOCATION:County Road e a,20 and adiacent to mode of business in this office. the I-B5 BOARD Frontage OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO BY:MARY ANN FEF,,UERSTEIN That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published COUNTY AND RECORDER TO AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY:Mary Reiff,Deputy in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; August the Daily Times-Call, Longmont, Colo.,Sept,20,1989. and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated September 20 , 19 89. ,C2 "-"--,,C;d4e.r•-•._ General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20th day of September ,19 89 c"-C\ A w e \ . \--\\Cum.rvv.cw.c?‘ Notary Public • r.,a r.P FEES 25.00 - rolvc,.,, ,,,,, wes cow.. mwl 891155 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 19, 1989 Page 3 MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved the request of Left Hand Water Association for organization of a service plan as amended by the Planning Commission be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Bud Clemons - abstain; Rick Iverson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried with four voting for the motion and one abstaining. CASE NUMBER: S-306 APPLICANT: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brother's Partnership REQUEST: A Site Specific Development plan and a Planned Unit Development Plan, First and Second Filings LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1,200 feet south of Weld County Road 24; east of and adjacent to the 1-25 Frontage Road APPEARANCE: David Faestel, Arrowstone Development, and Donald Slack, Architect and Planner. David Faestel stated he understands there are problems with the highway department, but would like to present the project and seek direction from the Planning Commission. They would continue this request, if necessary, to enable the applicant to work out an agreement regarding access with the Colorado Department of Highways. Tape 355 - Side 1 Wally Grant, property owner, asked that the hearing be continued and the Planning Commission then make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contingent to an agreement being reached with the Highway Department. 891158 c X�f�a�7 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 19, 1989 Page 4 The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff into the record. The Planning Staff's recommendation was for denial because adequate access to the mall had not been demonstrated. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number S-306 for Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brother's Partnership for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development Plan, First and Seconding Filings, be continued until the regularly scheduled October 17, 1989, meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission to allow the applicants time to present an acceptable plan for -access and development of the future frontage road with the State Highway Department. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. Tape 355 - Side 2 The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Ernie Ross - No, because in the Comprehensive Plan the rules and regulations are very clear about traffic safety and traffic flow into and out of such developments and the applicants should have addressed this issue. Motion carried with four voting for and one voting against the motion. CASE NUMBER: USR-889 APPLICANT: Kenney and Mary Ann Wright REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a principal dwelling and accessory to the farm dwelling on a parcel less than the minimum lot size in the A (Agricultural) zone Aistrict LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 35, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/4 mile west of the Town of Severance; north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 74. APPEARANCE: Ken Wright, property owner and applicant, stated they want to put a couple of mobile homes on their property for hired hands. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. -There was none. $81158 RESOLUTT '1 OF THE WELD COUNTY -PLANNING ^' "SISSION Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Meld County Planning Commission. Be it therefore Resolved by the Weld County _Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: S-306 NAME: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brother's Partnership ADDRESS: 515 Kimbark Street, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: -A Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development flan, First and Second Filing LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th B.M. , -of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1,200 feet south of Weld County Road 24 and east and adjacent to the I-25 Frontage Road be continued until the regularly scheduled October 17, 1989, meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission to allow the applicants time to complete an agreement with the State Highway Department for access into the Planned Unit development. -Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Jerry Kiefer Ernie Ross Bud Clemons Rick Iverson Judy Yamaguci .me Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified -copy be place in the file of this case to serve as a permanent record of t hese proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, :Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the _Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on September 19, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of t he Planning Commission. Dated the 20th of September, 1989. Bobbie Good Secretary 891158 Ritric engineers • planners • surveyors 1 . ._ 1. . ;i✓ August 21, 1989 Weld County Board of Commissioners c/o Tommie Antuna 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Tommie: Dn behalf of the Fifthcoff Company, I am requesting Case No. S-306 be placed on the next available County Commissioners agenda in order to discuss pre-advertising for the Mountain View Factory Stores PUD. This request is being made in order to meet the construction schedule anticipated for the factory outlet project. Please confirm with me the date and time of the hearing and I will have a representative available to answer questions. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, TIOCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULtL.TSt INC. • ennifer ' Rodriguez, A. I .C.P. tit -A\ANTUNA.LTR\4.1 Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 1960 Industrial Circle, Suite A, Longmont, Colorado 80501 303.772.5282 Offices also in Denver and Estes Park, CO Metro line: 665-6283 Fax No. 665-6959 891158 LT 1,- r -L . ,“ 4 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission October 17, 1989 -Pagel -APPEARANCE: Stephen Janssen, Attorney, Boulder, Colorado, represented DCS Construction, Inc. The applicants have reviewed the recommendation, conditions, and Development Standards prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff. They are in concurrence with these. They have also reviewed the screening requirement and will comply with these. They have met with the surrounding property owners and there has been no opposition to their plan. Larry Addison, Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company, stated they --are not against this proposal, but they do have a gasline running through the property. Prior to any beginning any construction, they would appreciate being notified so they can review the location of any proposed structures. The Chairman asked that the recommendation, conditions, and development standards prepared by the Department of Planning Services staff' be filed -with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION: Ann Garrison moved Casa Number USR-891 for Thomas and Peggy Fisher for a Site Specific Development Elan end a Special Review permitfor an agricultural service establishment (decorative rock sales and ditch cleaning business) be forwarded to the Board - of County Commissioners_ with the Planning Commission's recommendation - for approval based upon the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the - Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony _heard by - the Planning Commission.- -Motion seconded by Judy Yamaguchi. - The thairnan called far discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Jerry Kiefer - ayes; Ernie Ross - yes. Motion carried unanimously. tASE NUMBER: 5-306 (Continued from September 19, 1989) APPLICANT: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development plan, let and 2nd Filing. L-EGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 11, T2N, -R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1.200 feet south of Weld County Road 24 and adjacent to the east I-25 Frontage Toad. S91158 ,ex,9/43/7 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission October 17, 1989 Page 4 APPEARANCE: Appearance, Donald Slack, Architect and Planner, stated testimony was taken at the September 19, 1989, Planning Commission meeting. Items still needing to be completed for the Factory Outlet tenter at that time were State Highway Department recommendations on the frontage road,and alignment and access points into the property. They have met with the Highway Department and they have agreed -with their plan. The staff has a letter from them pertaining to this agreement. He has reviewed the staff's recommendation and they do not have any real problem with it with -the exception of paragraph 4 on the second page. He would like to see this paragraph changed from prior to issuing building permits to prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy so they can do construction on the road at the same time they are constructing the building. Their agreement with the Highway Department _ allows this to be done. - - Rod Allison _recommended this condition not be changed unless it was approved by the Highway Department. He explained he would phone the Higway Department for its recommended action. The applicant can present this proposal at their hearing with the Board of County Commissioners and it can be changed at that time if the Board so desires. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There vas none. The Chairman asked that the recommendation and conditions outlined by the staff be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION Bud Halldcrson moved Case Number S-307 for Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers partnership for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development plan, first -and Second Filing be forwarded to the Board of -County Commissioners with the planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation and conditions presented by the Department of Planning Services staff' and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Jerry Burnett. The Chairmar called for discussion free the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission -for their decision. Ann Garrison — yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; Judy Y-amaguchi — yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie -toss - yes. Motion carried unanimously. $91158 a w'n.d,+7. r W *,:..s•.4'Ai'e-� *'��..,-d....t,r< Yti:7c.... .`r.d 4"'4 r^^w n.,.s01/44' e.a BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING' COMMISSION 'RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD-OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Bud Halldorson that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: S-306 NAME: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership ADDRESS: 515 Kimbark Street, Longmont, CO 80525 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development plan and a Planned Unit Development plan, First and Second filing. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1,200 feet south of Weld County Road 24; east of and adjacent to the 1-25 Frontage Road. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.9 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan application is in conformance with Section 28.14 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The PUD plan is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use Development area. The uses proposed for the PUD plan are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area and Activity Centers Section of the Comprehensive Plan; - The PUD plan conforms to the PUD district. The Utility Coordinating Advisory Committee reviewed and approved the utility plan map at its September 14 meeting; - The application materials demonstrate that the uses allowed under the proposed PUD plan will be compatible with existing and future development as projected by the plans of affected municipalities; - The PUD plan will conform with the performance outlined in Section 35.3; and - The PUD plan is not located in an overlay district area. �{ 881158 Ex/di/sir t,si; S-306 Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership Page 2 These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request, and responses of referral entities reviewing the request. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the Planned Unit Development plan plat, the applicant shall: - Submit an original subdivision improvement agreement and four copies to the Department of Planning Services. The agreement shall also address improvements to the east 1-25 Frontage Road required by the Colorado Division of Highways. The agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. - Submit evidence that a law enforcement authority has been formed according to state law. The law enforcement authority to be formed shall be capable of expanding to serve other areas within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area to avoid duplication of overhead and other operating costs; - Amend the PUD plan application materials to comply with the general sign and identification sign requirements in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - Amend the PUD plan landscape plat to show that adequate sight distance on the east I-25 Frontage Road will be protected. The landscape plat shall be approved by a representative of the Colorado Division of Highways; and - Submit evidence to the Colorado Division of Highways and Department of Planning Services that the area for the future frontage road within the PUD district has been dedicated to the Colorado Division of Highways. - Amend the PUD plan plat to show: - A design for ingress and egress from the east I-25 Frontage Road. All access points shall comply with the October 13, 1989, letter signed by Mr. Wallace R. Jacobson, representative for the Colorado Division of Highways; - A 15 foot perimeter utility easement around Filings 1 and 2; 891158 S-306 Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership Page 3 - As a minimum, the parking space requirement of 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area plus an adequate area for tour bus parking; - The location of mall identification signs; and - Dedication of additional rights-of-way, if needed, to allow for turn lane construction on the East I-25 Frontage Road. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the PUD plan plat: - The use permitted in this PUD plan shall be a retail shopping mall as described in the application materials and as permitted by Case Number Z-447 on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners; - -Prior to issuing building permits, approval of a site plan -review on each lot As required in accordance with Section 33.4.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The site plan review shall comply with the PUD plan and PUD district application materials on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners; - -Prior to issuing building permits for construction of the second filing, the future frontage road shall be constructed by the owners of the Ni of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th Y.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and/or via a local improvement district. The Colorado Division of Highway shall verify that the road has been constructed and approved; - Prior to approval of a site plan review, the applicant shall amend the drainage and grading plan application materials to meet the P.U.D. plan requirements of Section 28.11.6 through 28.11 .14 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The amended plan shall also address note #F8 of Case Z-447. The amended plan shall comply with the Weld County Subdivision Storm Drainage regulations listed in Section 8-11 and receive approval from the County Engineer; - Prior to approval of a site plan review, the applicant shall submit a road . improvements master plan in accordance with Note 6 of Case 2-447; 831158 S-306 Tifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership Page 4 - she Commercial zone district performance standards and supplementary regulations as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with; - A subdivision improvements agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners for the second filing prior to approving its site plan review; and - The requirements of the Longmont Rural Fire Protection District and Weld County Sheriff's Department shall be met. Motion seconded by Jerry Burnett. VOTE: Tor Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Jerry Burnett Judy Yamaguchi -Bud Halldorson -Rick Iverson Jerry Kiefer Ernie Ross LeAnn Reid The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Danna Nelson, Acting Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, I;olorado, adopted on October 17, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 18th of October, 1989. hs-two'A • Danna Nelson Acting Secretary 891158 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number S-306 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearin at llearin • J. Application Pages - i5 2. Applicant plat(s) 6 pages) 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet 4. DPS Recommendation 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List 6. DPS Mineral Owner' s Mailing List 7. DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician 8. DPS Notice of Hearing 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet 10. DPS Field Check 11. �rarri c 1M4lysIS APO MAIM-MrN, vine FAcTaCVSM' f ✓ 12. Lei+r� c&teASerf Pitt. of 2 r'„l�' 13. MPmp CW1 /GG 2, /ft'9 fir Wei` Ffe-, F— l —; 14. Merwe Ciotti jw2r/ /46 6:0_ /el i lcu,+t7 / eabitPrt - / e, 13.b e i�/a e' P7/,/1,O C e( �irr�n'r'7 /191,4- 16. 1&m,/ G Sett, /96e1 ff�ory ��LJt 6i/ . E �'uf.L(/ t4 i'�Gh /iii i/9. 9�nte,,a /i',„ 4,,a.7,c..a 17 v l7 //`..,„* 'fie hnynpfl,Y - a lef(/q 19.4$461/ gy�pp{{ GG for art [rar- �urt Pelt - Zjjc 11 20. ; 21. revu I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board' s office on . �'2..liv- rA: Current Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD A3 SUBSCRIBE0L�ND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ran= day of cb Ot.b\ %2" _ 19 . ,f E UB%cte() , . os Cdoa -A� ...-••'QF NOTARY PUBLIC 'My Commission Expires MY Commission Expir®s Feb. 13, 1993 891158 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION _Case Number Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing at Nearing 1. Application Pages 2. Applicant plat(s) page(s) 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet 4. DPS Recommendation 5. DPS -surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List 6. BPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List 7. BPS Maps :Prepared by Planning Technician 8. BPS Notice of Hearing 9. BPS Case Tile Summary Sheet • 10. DPS Field Check 22 1 St kMe„T4 c a / fAcct' _ „Lit„4"--, / ate, /5,f-c i3 , #, /. intro - .2rerea C.La t r)yK - iry__% �¢�/ c-v-2.7, /�� 29 " tab, ` 7Fr;y /h eietc -- (, . Geatd r2 / 1 Z_�, /"1e ' �� /''taree — it exi " r� ' 1)c7`, 2� M ti;`ti 2,6, j- . ASR'+, A1pL ,c.- L �✓ fA2e.f - 2- plat II ' c'� M�.�e�,�� n��, — 11 � S b to., tkril,u:.,.�', ;Pe ce, �c.� O�, /61 16. • 17. FS. 19. 20. 21. I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at ar -prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clark to the Board's office on . Current Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS day of 19 SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC 89115B My Commission Expires /� P j�t-�.L tin I1HIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET (20„, PIJ'-L� f.9.a.+,., I ? —d �� case _ /3-1V-6 .LJ12. PGL'1 lLClvy-�"-�-/" Exhibit Submitted Rix Exhibit iDestriptinn A. � .IS0AJU. kn 0 ��.Pt / S pc..PIiLG(//'C/Ll4Q.e. %.73-B• 0IL i2 ita.Q-0-6�7/tat 71 C. JLll 7?Si n . ll it /il /Ain< 41.1.6 1-I.77,G6. 1 0 y/ A I • D• 71-/ V � / E. 2 A ��//-7717/1ID0. zl1U�Z1LC711� J2( Jn/J/! . tF�D/2C/c1 F. .;. 6/.Lk j1� fSLL2 �/LCiza / 11Jt,(�j,1 G. - H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. 891158 SUPPLEMENTAL LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY -SHEET Date: October 10, 1-989 CASE NUMBER: S-306 NAME: Fifthcoff Company and Grant Brothers Partnership ADDRESS: 315 Kimbark Street, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Planned Unit Development Plan, First and Second Tiling. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section ll, T2N, R6-SW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Color-ado LOCATION: Approximately 1,200 feet south of Weld County Road 2-4 and adjacent to the east 1-25 frontage Road. SIZE LT PARCEL: 13.7 Acres, more or less POSSIBL-E ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: This -proposal -was continued at the September 19th Planning Commission meeting. The applicants were asked to meet with =epreaentatives of the Colorado JDivision of Highways -to resolve concerns about the number and location of _driveways to the mall, the location and development of the 4 future frontage road. The applicants have submitted additional information and two revised maps addressing these concerns. The applicants have -submitted additional :information to the County -Engineer about the drainage plan. Attached is a memo dated September 27, 11989 from Drew Scheltinga addressing the additional drainage information. A memo from the Tri-Area Planning Commission and a letter from- 11e Army Corps of Engineers are also attached for your information. 891158 (4",ii(er.) M811ORIVIDUITI winkTo -Pnri All Dl ing Date r 77t 1984 COLORADO From Draw -cCheltinga rnunty Fngirxner Subject: Fifthrnff Cn (Arrnwctona Sits), c-inn I have reviewed the letter of September 18, 1989 by Kurt Rollin of -Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. Mr. Rollin's letter addresses the concepts of a master drainage plan, but still does not provide specific engineering information. The attached master drainage plan has a note pointing to the 100-year floodplain limits that states, "As this site is developed in the future, a letter of map amendment will be 'obtained to revise the 100-year floodplain limits." That does not address the intent _of a planned-unit development, or the requirements of Section 8-11, "Storm mrainage and Flood Plans", of the Weld County _Subdivision Regulations. Because of the PUD concept, I understand that certain assumptions about how the site is to develop, gill -lave to be made. However, the hydrology and hydraulic information, along with concepts and details of how -runoff is to be handled, most te supplied. A good example of how conceptual master planning tan to completed, is the traffic analysis work that has been provided by Felsburg, -Holt and Ullevig, for this site. I can understand how the applicant may te -reluctant to delve into further detail, while -there are other major issues that remain to be resolved with this first site application. Therefore, I think it would be appropriate to postpone additional -detailed information until the site plan review stage. This would to consistent with Item No. 4 of Mr. Rollin's letter. I am sure there will -need to to further discussion between -Mr. Rollin and me regarding the engineering aspects of further submittals. Please note no information for the master road improvements Tlan has been submitted. This could be handled in the same light as the master drainage plan. SEP 28 191-9 DLS/mw:prfifth tdSO �120111f14yoIDoliSS6au xc: Commissioner Lacy Subdivision File - Crossroads at Del Camino, Fifthcoff Lo. (Arrowstone Site), S-306 891156 W°'` � �� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY O I�1 in OMAHA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS cM1�s � ROCKY MOUNTAIN AREA ,..i sup p 2840 S. CIRCLE MR.. NORTH BLDG.. SUITE GL IO COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 30906-4188 REI .Y TO ATTENTION or Platte Slyer Resident Office 28 September 1989 Rod Allison Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. -Allison: — Reference is made to Case Number S-306. During a September 8, 1989 site visit conducted by me, it was found that -no Waters of the U.S. including wetlands exist on this site, mentioned as Case Number S-306. This letter is to inform you that the proposed activity will not require a Department of the Army (DA) Permit. Although a DA Permit will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement _that you obtain other applicable Federal, State or Local Permits as required. i If you have any questions Concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or call me at 303/9794120 or 4121. Sincerely, Mc Terry e`\%'"— Environmental Resource Specialist cc: ' Permit Files Omaha Permits Branch 111 I3 KATOK\VF SEP -2-9 1989 891158 ^Iamola LWlinissm DEPARTMrNT OF PLANNING SERVICES ,r << PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT.4400 i915 10th STREET y' GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 17;6; CASE NUMBER 5-306 COLORADO August 18, 1589 TC WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Fifthcoff company and Grant Brothers, c/o Doug Grant for a Site Specific Development -Plan and P.U.D. plan, First and Second Filing. The parcel of land is described as part of the NWi of Section 11, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been -submitted is approximately 1,200 feet south of -Weld County Road 24 and east -and adjac-ent to the I-25 Frontage Road. This application As submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comment-a or recommendation you ccr,sider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the -application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Pleats reply by September 1 , 1989, -so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate loxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have -reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with -our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 0 g ?.. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we _feel eel this request ro (is/is not) compatible with -the interests of our 1 town for the following reasons: 0 Fd —a XX We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation Eta under consideration and will le submitted to you prior tu: 5. Please ref r to the enclosed letter. Signed: _Agency: Tri\-Area Planning Commission Date: 414/ 891158 Mok(C4:, mEmORAIMU 1119€ To Rod Allison, Planning Date rtn to 17, 1989 COLORADO From n C holrin ar-Cou_t.T nw nr,.ar Subject Fifthcoff Co (Arrot7ctnre _i*e), c-3fl After reviewing the Colorado _Department of Highways' letter, by Wally Jacobsen, of October 13, 1989, and the additional materials supplied, I have to further comments to add to my memo of September 27, 1989. I will anticipate the -materials I have requested on drainage, revised PUD access, and master road improvements plan, at the time of the site plan review. DLS/mw:prfc xc: Commissioner Lacy Subdivision Tile - Crossroads at Del Camino, Fifthcoff Co. (Arrowstone Site), S-306 891158 �� OCT 1 8 1989 Slack Ellermann Architects PC October 9 , 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning 915 10th Street, Room 342 Greeley, CO 81,631 Re: Mountain View Factory Stores Dear Rod: Enclosed please find twenty copies of the revised PUD Plan for the referenced project. Changes to note: 1) Access points by number and location. 2) Incorporation of realigned frontage road into plan. 3) Incorporation of internal circulation road South of site into Plan. The Highway Department has indicated that they will allow Filing #1 to proceed without the construction of the realigned frontage road . Walley Grant is still working with them on the details regarding when and how it will be completed . We have revised the number and location of access points to comply with the access code for the design speed of 45 mph which has also bean accepted by them. We assume, but have no confirmation as yet that this plan will be acceptable to them. Also , we have indicated to them that the accel lane they asked about is not necessary. We are awaiting their response to that point as well . We should be able to reach an agreement with them by this Friday, October 13th, on these issues. Clearly as we view these points , we believe we have compromised sufficiently to allow them to accept the revised proposal as is. We have indicated to them that we cannot have any less access than shown to sustain this project, so it will be our intent to ask the County to approve this configuration. 891158 The Quorum at UK, • 7935 East Prentice Avenue • Suite 103 • Englewood Colorado 80111 • 303/220 8900 • FAX 220 0708 Slack Ellermann Architects PC Page Two Mountain View Factory Stores Rocky Mountain Consultants is to provide the remainder of the information you require and I am sending this letter to you through their office to insure that the total package they get to you on Tuesday is complete. Very truly yours , SLACK LLERMANN ARCHITECT-S PC Donal R. Slack President DRS/asl Enclosures 891158 FELSBURG HOLT & I ULLEVI G , c' 5rr October 6, 1989 e " Mr. Don Slack Slack Ellermann Architects 7935 East Prentice Avenue Suite 1O3 Englewood, Colorado 80111 RE: Mountain View Factory Stores. FHU Reference No. -89-O48 Dear Mr. Slack: Following our meeting this morning, it is our understanding that you will be revising the proposed site plan on the above referenced project to reflect the following access plan: o Two accesses to serve delivery trucks only. One access would be on the north end of the site, while the other would be at the south end. If the internal road for the overall P.U.D. is to be located adjacent to the south boundary of the factory stores site, the southern truck access would then be designed off the internal road instead of directly accessing the frontage road. o Two accesses serving the general public. These two accesses would be the middle two accesses shown on your previously proposed plan. Thus, the two primary accesses would be separated by approxi- mately 350 feet and the distance between these accesses and the service accesses would be about 41O feet. The effect of this proposed reduction in the number of access- es would be to concentrate the traffic, resulting in higher volumes at each access. Based on the projected traffic vol- umes illustrated on Figures 5 and 6 of the previous traffic study, the following table summarizes the approximate peak hour volumes which would be expected at each of the two public access-es under the revised access plan. Specializmy m A inspc ilaLo1 and Cwl Lr ntt u 5299 DTC Bail( vard • Suile 400 891158 Englewood, Colorado 801 1 1 Is (303) 721-14.10 October 6 , 1989 Mr. Don Slack Page Two Phase I AM/PM Phase II AM/PM Left In 25/65 40/90 Right In 5/5 5/5 Right Out 15/85 20/115 Left Out 5/5 5/5 A review of these volumes suggests the following regarding the need for additional turn lanes on the frontage road: o The need for the continuous left turn lane to accommodate the vehicles turning into the site from the north remains important. o Even with the reduced number of accesses, the traffic volumes expected to come to the site from the south on the frontage road are very low. Based on these volumes, right turn deceleration lanes would not be justified (Access Code Section 4 .7 . 2) . o According to Section 4 .7 . 3 of the Access Code, right turn acceleration lanes from the accesses would be warranted. However, our experience indicates that acceleration lanes at such accesses are seldom used properly (if at all) . This is particularly true on roadways with operating speeds of 40 MPH or less. Because of this experience and because the through volumes on the frontage road are relatively low, we believe that the value of acceleration lanes at these accesses is questionable. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please call . Sincerely, FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG ai r . Robert W. Felsburg, E. Principal RWF/co 891158 h h C engineers • planners • surveyors October 10, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Rod: In response to the issues raised by the State Highway Department and the Weld County Engineering Department concerning the Mountain View Factory Stores final PUD application, the applicant has met with representatives of the State Highway Department. The following items have been mutually agreed upon in order to proceed: 1 . The frontage road realignment will be reserved or dedicated at the option of the State Highway Department upon approval of the Final PUD. A revised Utility Plan Map and Site Plan identifying the location of the relocated frontage road are attached. 2. Based upon the location of the relocated frontage road, which utilizes a 45 mph design speed, a revised proposal for access to the Mountain View Factory Stores has been submitted to the State Highway Department. The revised access points are also identified on the attached Utility Plan Map and Site Plan. Please note that the Mountain View Factory Stores site has been moved 20 feet to the south in order to minimize the impact of the frontage road realignment on the site de-sign. The Final Plat Map for the site will reflect this change. 3. The relocated frontage road will be constructed when the State Highway Department determines it is needed based upon a subsequent Traffic Analysis Addendum. 4. The cost of constructing the relocated frontage road will be borne by the owners of the N 1/2 of Section 11, via a Local Improvement District comprising the N 1/2 of Section 11 or a part thereof. Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 1960 Industrial Circle, Suite A, Longmont, Colorado 80501 303-772-5282 Offices also in Denver and Estes Park, CO Metro line: 665-6283 Fax No. 665-6959 891158 page two Mr. Rod Allison October 10, 1989 5. The improvements required in order to accommodate the Mountain View Factory Stores 1st Phase will be as specified in the Traffic Analysis Addendum, Mountain View Factory Stores, prepared by Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig, August, 1989. (See attached road improvement cross sections) . In addition to addressing the comments received form the State Highway Department, the applicant has contacted Mr. Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer, regarding his comments. Please find attached a copy of correspondence from Mr. Kurt Rollin, RMC, addressing those issues and a subsequent letter from Mr. Scheltinga indicating his concerns have been resolved with respect to the current Final PUD application. In a subsequent conversation with Drew, he indicated the ROW width for the internal road system would need to be either 60' or 80' depending upon the road configuration and class- ification. This will be determined as further site designing for the overall PUD District is completed. It has been our intent to resolve these issues in order to proceed with review of the proposal by the Weld County Planning Commission at their October 17, 1989 meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i // ' '✓7�c - . // —"Jennifer V. Rodriguez, A. I.C.P. Principal dt D\ARR0WST0.STH\2.0 Attachments cc: Don Slack Wally Grant Bob Felsburg 891158 s tii \ \‘‘,...,_4 ) AA CR 24 14 v� / st / 0 20 ♦0 / I/ I 7/ / /7n9 / • a I /j/ / / / i se tiI /4" / / /7/ / / 891158 **: TOTAL FRGE . 002 ** • lad I i&w or view f' • -2 g' zo' Pa .gulf Zo' raver-lair / 5' a r 1 3./ s:, TyMIGPL IUTfJJPL 9-rieeE.T 891158 engineers •{planners • surveyors • September 18, 1989 Mr. Drew Scheltinga Weld County Engineer P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO -80632 RE: Reply to comments on the Master -Drainage Plan, Arrowstone Site - trossroads at -Del Camino Dear Mr. Scheltinga: We have just revi-ewed your comments on the -Drainage 2lan submitted for the Mountain View Factory Stores site in the Crossroads at Del Camino P.U.D. These comments were contained in a memorandum from you to Mr. Rod Allison im the Weld _County Planning Department dated September 11, 1989. We would like to submit the following reply to the comments for your review: 1. The originally submitted drainage plan that was labeled as "Mountain View Factory Stores, -Grading and -Drainage Plan" was intended to also serve as a Master Drainage Plan for the Crossroads at Del Camino site. -Since details as to the long range plans for the development of the Crossroads site -are not complete, the revised Master Drainage Plan will show our proposed temporary solutions to the drainage detention. 2. The proposed storm runoff -detention ponds to be located in the greenbelt area east of this project are to be reclaimed gravel mines that will be constructed in the future. To provide temporary detention storage for the 5 year historic release rate required by the County, a temporary detention pond will be constructed on the Crossroads site in the corner where the existing west edge of the 100 year floodplain limit crosses Road 24. This pond would be sized to detain runoff from Crossroads site west of the floodplain and release it into Godding Hollow at the 5 year historic runoff rate. This temporary pond will be removed once the permanent detention ponds are constructed. Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 1960 Industrial Circle,Suite A, Longmont, Colorado 80501 303.772-5282 Offices also in Denver and Estes Park, CO Metro line:-665.6283 Fax No. 665-6959 -X31158 paige two Mr. Drew S-cheltinga September 1-8, 1989 3. To help minimize the size of a internal storm sewer system for the Crossroads site, each individual site will be required to provide on-site detention storage for the 100 year storm runoff. The runoff from these ponds will be released into the large detention ponds tote located in the greenbelt area along Godding Hollow. 4. A more detailed _grading and drainage plan for the Mountain View Factory site will de provided at the time of the final site plan submittal . Details on the sizing and release structure for the temporary detention pond will also be provided -at this time. 5. The temporary waste ditch that will be used to tarry the runoff from the Mountain View Factory stores site to the temporary detention pond will be located completely within the Crossroads at Del 'Camino P.U.D. and therefore no off-site landowners will be affected by the sheet flow from the site. -A copy of the revised Master Drainage Plan shall be included with this letter for your review. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. Kv,v\ Kurt Rollin, P. E. dt A\DREW.LTR\55.2 cc: Rod Allison, Weld County Planning Don Slack, Slack Ellerman Wally Grant 891158 4(/,-;:/ f Rfl f DUO i hiDeTo Pod Allison, Planning -Date - bex 27, 1980 COLORADO From Pr-pw crhaltinga, Cnnnty Fnginaar Subject: Fifthrnff rn (Arrnwctnna Sita) , S-1116 • I have reviewed the letter of September 18, 1089 by Kurt Rollin of Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. Mr. -Rollin's letter addresses the concepts of a master drainage plan, but still does not provide specific engineering information. The attached -master drainage plan has a note pointing to the 100-year floodplain limits that states, 'its this site is -developed in the future, a letter of 'map amendment will be obtained to -revise the 100-year floodplain limits." That -does not address the intent of a planned-unit development, -or the requirements of Section 8-11, "Storm Drainage and Flood plans", of the Wel-d County Subdivision Regulations. Because of the PUD concept, I understand that certain assumptions about how the site is to -develop, will have to be made. However, the hydrology and hydraulic information, along with concepts and details of how runoff is to he handled, must be supplied. A good example of how conceptual master planning can be completed, is the traffic analysis work that has been provided 'by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig, for this site. I can understand how the applicant may be reluctant to delve into further detail, while there are other major issues that remain to be resolved with this first site application. Therefore, I think it would be appropriate to postpone additional detailed information until the site plan review stage. This would be consistent with Item No. 4 of Mr. Rollin's letter. I am sure there will teed to be further discussion 'between Mr. -Rollin and me regarding the engineering aspects of further submittals. Please note no information for the master road improvements plan has been submitted. This could be handled in the same light as the master drainage plan. 0 __ .p).*:q7 ) \-\ L!1I19 89 I DLS/mw:prfifth IMO Co. Naama'-__...not1 wu xc: Commissioner Lacy Subdivision File - T.rossroads at Del Camino, -Ffthcoff Co. (dtrrowstone Site), £-306 X1.1.53 DEPARTMnNT OF PLANNING SERVICES +: ( V PHONE(303)3564000 EXT. 4400 ET �y� •t` 915 10ADO 80 31 �` 1 -(3REELEY, COLORADO 80631 ,F k.Iw 0 f �LL tli.y COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 19, 1989; at 1 :30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Fite Specific Development Tlan and a F.U.D. Plan, First and Second Filing, -for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vea`ted property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Fifthcoff Company and Grant -Brothers Partnership, c/o Doug Grant LEGAL -DESCRIPTION: Pert of the NWi of -Section 11 , T2N, R68W of the 6th F.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Site specific -Development Plan and P.U.D. -Plan, First and Second Filing -LOCATION: -Approximately 1,200 feet -south cf Weld County Road 24 and east and adjacent to the I-25 Trontage Road. SIZE: 13 .7 acres, more or less The public hearing will be -held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First -Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth -Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should he submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 91 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado £0631, before the above -date or presented at the public tearing on -September 19, 1989. • Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of _Planning Services, Room 542, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 — Thome - 356-4000, Extension 4400. • 1 Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the New News Tc be -ub11s a ore ( ) ti y Sept mber 7, 1989 Received by: t1 Date: Y- 7- I 7" 111 891158 MAILING LIST Fifthcoff Co. and Grant Bros. S-306 Gary S. and Mark C. Booth P.O. Box 386 Ault, CO 80610 St. Vxain Land Company 6999 York Street Denver, CC 70229 Robert 1,. England 4969 Weld County Road 24 Longmont, CO 80501 Larry Gordan c/o Stan Schneider 10351 Santa Monica Blvd. #300 Los Angeles, LA 90025 New Creation Ministries & World Outreach Center Church 737 Bross Longmont, CO 80501 Milton L. and Edwin S. Kahn 6750 East Eastman Avenue Denver, CO 8Dm asi Clarence ,T. and Vivian P. Evers 1203 Princeton Court Longmont, CO _80501 Ronald L. and Darlene T. Fahrenholtz 1119 Windslow Circle Longmont, CO 80501 Chevron USA, Inc. Property ,fax Section 3336 East 32nd Street Tulsa, DK 74135 Mustard end Associates P.O. Box _53 El -Rancho Golden, _CC 80401 Martinka Farrell _Partnership P.O. Box 179 Longmont, CO $0501 891158 Fifthcoff Co. and Grant Bros. S-306 Page 2 Schmoll Construction, Inc. 601 North Front Street P.O. Box 7141 Townsent, MT 59644 Rite-A-Way Industries, Inc. c/c Joel Wiens P.O. Box 760 Kimball, NE 69145 Burger Avenue Investment, Ltd. 211 West Magnolia Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dalton, I 5 Co. P.O. Box 1287 Longmont, CO 80501 Helen Susuras P.O. Box E4 Dacono, CO 80514 Donald J. Sherwood 120 9th Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 C. Richard and Mary H. Dalton P.D. Box 35 Newark, MO 63458 D Q Restaurants of Colorado, Ltd. 3C0 West 53rd Plance, Unit I Denver, CO 80216 Mary B. and Virgil L. Taggart 130 Sunlight dircle, Route 1 Livermore, CO 80336 Texaco, Inc. Tax Department P.D. Box 7813 Universal _City, CA 91608 McDonald's Corporation P.D. Box 66207 Amf O'Hare Airport Chicago, I1 6066b 891iw Fifthcoff Co. and Grant Bros. S-306 Page 3 Burger Avenue Investments, Inc. 125 South Homes, 5th Floor Fort Collins, CO 80521 Power Wash Investments, Ltd. , II c/o Angelo Dimotsantos 300 West 53rd Place, Unit E Denver, CO 80216 Longmont Partnership, II c/o Super 8 Motel, Inc. 10805 Turner Blvd. Longmont, CO 80501 Olson Land and _Cattle Company 4306 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Jack E. and Margaret L. Hill, et al. 4739 Weld County Raod 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Azalea Farms, Ltd. c/o Edwin M. McDowell, Jr. 4862 Kellogg Circle Boulder, CO 80303 Wilbur R. and Shirley Hurt 14278 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 U/W Carl R. Oswald Trust 14707 North 95th Street Longmont, CO 80, 601 Donald A. Neighbors 10140 Weld County Road 11 Longmont, CO 80501 George and Dorothy R. Johnson 3838 South Jasmine Street Denver, CO 80237 Machii - Ross Petroleum Company Suite 3070 3420 Ocean Park Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 80405-3305 Fifthcoff Cc. and Grant Bros. S-306 - - Page 4 Vessels Oil and Gas Company c/o Thomas Vessels Suite 2000, Prudential Plaza 1050 17th Street Denver, CO 80205 Adolph Coors Company Golden, CO 80401 Grant Brothers F.O. Box 948 Longmont, CO 80501 O 591158 t PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION • Department of Planning Services, 915 — 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPL. FEE ZONING DISTRICT - RECORDING FEE DATE RECEIPT NO. APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: tPrint or type only except for re-quired signatures) : I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning proposed subdivision of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County. IlEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet of this same size.) NAME OF PROPOSED P.U.D. SUBDIVISION M OUM v I/1CW ?MINI vvy 5}ores EXISTING ZONING ?UP _ PROPOSED ZONING -F U P TOTAL AREA (ACRES) (3.'] NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS 4- LOT SIZE: AVERAGE (.45' acre, MINIMUM UTILITIES: WATER: NAME FFNTRAI WFID CDHNTY WATER DISTRICT _ SEWER: NAME ST VRATN SANITATION DI-STRICT GAS: NAME ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIIRAI GAS PHONE: NAME II S WEST DISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME ST. VRAIV VALLEY RE 1J FIRE: NAME IONGMONT URA' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DESIGNERS' NAME C;IA Fllerw,. Avc✓^.t{ects Pc. ADDRESS 1g35 -e. (Attoe t [03 e t Co 80111 PHONE Z'YO-$q00 ENGINEERS' NAME ROGI�y Moues qth CwKswltaa IK ADDRESS M00 iviziA s4Yt. Cif. * A I.ptno s owt Co f oG 0 I PHONE 172,..52.82_ FEE OWNER OF AREA PROPOSED FOR P.U.D.t SUBDIVISION NAME FIFTHCOFF COMPANY , A COLORADO CORPORATION & GRANT BROTHERS, A PARTNERS-HIP _ ADDRESS r,15 KTMRARK ST IONGMONT, CO 2051)1 PHONE 776-9900 NAME ADDRESS PHONE NAME ADDRESS PHONE I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, _proposals. and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of -my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) \ STATE OF COLORADO ) n,1 of gent _. Signature: Owner of ized gent Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 198q . SIAL II /�. .!. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: lti(.(gl,(51 la , O0)- P04-79-026 PO4-79-026 WCDPS-78-1 861158 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR MOUNTAIN VIEW FACTORY STORES A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHENCE THE WEST TONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11 BEARS SOUTH 89°58'58" WEST 275.50 FEET, SAID POINT ALSO BEING TON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE INTERSTATE 25 FRONTAGE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OR-WAY LINE NORTH 00°00'30" EAST 3(1 .00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00u00'3O" EAST 1 ,2133.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-TOE-WAY LINE SOUTH 89°59'30" EAST 490.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°00'30" WEST 1,2F8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'30" WEST 480.00 FEET TO THE TO THE TRUE POINT LE BEGINNING CONTAINING 13.71)1 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 891158 I 1, (AUG 17 1989 PUD DESIGN OBJECTIVES : The plan of the PUD is designed to provide a marketplaceeicretdi!i•it' ,0assweS'j environment , to allow easy visual and directional access , and to provide a safe and pleasant mix of automobile and pedestrian traffic at this destination oriented site . The architecture of the PUD is desi-fined to provide a quality mixed-use retail environment, and as such, incorporates a variety of architectural styles and details to achieve a pleasant pedestrian environment within the factory shops . The observation tower is intended to not only serve as a focal point to draw visitors into the site , but to provide an important amenity that renders spectacular views of Longmont and the Rocky Mountains . The height of the tower is expected to be up to 75 ' to take full advantage of its potential as a strong visual amenity to the project and the area. It is fully integrated into the architectural style of the center and it is for these reasons that allowing it to be 75 ' should be considered a minor or technical change to the PUD ' s 50 ' height limitation . In other words , this is not a change in the allowable building height per say , but a minor change to allow the tower as a project focal point -and feature. Major materials will be of brick , block , stucco, and decorative metal . Colorful accents will be provided by signage , canvas awnings , flags/banners, and landscaping . The predominant colors of the center will be balanced between warm and cool colors in order to provide a pleasing variety of architectural environments . SIGNAGE -PROPOSAL PROJECT/JOINT TENANT SIGN: One major project sign is anticipated . In order to take advantage of the highway frontage ( the reason the tenants are here at all ) , while preserving a sign type that is a positive visual addition to the project, we are proposing a sign that contains the Shopping Center identification as well as an electronic reader board that allows tenant identification, sales information , specials , arid the like to be displayed at intervals ratter than the clutter of too much information in one place at one time . We propose this sign to be no greater than 35 ' in height or 400 square feet in area, per side , and two sided . The specific design of the sign will be worke-d out with Site Plan approval . WALL SIGNAGE: Per PUD Zone Ordinance Directional/Informational Signage: As required to insure smooth , safe , convenient traffic and pedestrian flow. 891158 STATEMENT #10 Mountain View Factory Stores Project Data . Site (PUD) Area • 13 . 7 AC/596 , 820 SF One Structure Containing : 121 ,960 SF Use • Retail/Commercial/Restaurant Parking Provided 779 Spaces Open Storage Area • None Loading Area • + 75 , 000 SF The proposed location is compatible with other possible uses within the PUD District due to its focus on and to Interstate 25 . This focus allows future development to occur without conflicts or negative impacts. It is anticipated that the rear of surrounding building sites will back to the rear of this development thereby minimizing service area impacts to the District as a whole . Access to the site will be from the highway frontage road , widened along the developed frontage to 40 ' of pavement width . This will allow for through traffic to continue along the property unobstructed while allowing turns into the project to occur within a center designated turn lane . 891158 STATEMENT #11 Mountain View Factory Stores , one large strip shopping center , to be built in two filings , will be operated as a specialty retail center featuring retail operations owned and operated , for the most part , by nationally recognized manufacturers of name brand merchandise . Items such as shoes , clothing , toys , household goods and luggage , as well as other items will be sold by the estimated 30 stores . In addition to retailers, space may be occupied by food establish- ments as well as a visitor information center and public areas including a bus driver ' s lounge . Stores are expected to have average sales of $200 . 00 per square foot per year . It is anticipated that the 30 stores would each have a full time store manager and assistant manager , plus numerous full and/or part time sales or stock personnel . Mountain View Factory Stores will support from 300-400 jobs when both filings are completed . Hours of operation may be from as early as 8 : 00 a.m. daily to 10 : 00 p.m. . Stock personnel or management would of course arrive earlier and/or leave later . Restaurants may choose to have extended hours . If a sit down restaurant would occupy the center , it might want a 24 hour operation. As a separate structure the developer is considering constructing a photo observation tower where tourists and locals may take photos , or simply admire the views of the twin peaks area of the front range. Parking ratios shall be designed at more than 6 cars per 1 , 000 square foot of retail area, as filed . A service drive will be provided around the perimeter of the project to keep large vehicles out of the pedestrian area . 891158 STATEMENT #12 Mountain View Factory Stores has a 6 ' wide landscape strip planned around the perimeter of the project at the loading areas to insure proper buffering of that area . The street edge landscape strip is 20 ' wide to provide for a smooth visual transition from street to parking lot . STATEMENT #13 No public open space is intended . Private open space will be in two forms. 1) Passive landscaped areas either at the perimeter or within the parking area of the project and 2) Active sidewalk areas along the store fronts to create a shopping "street" which will be designed to enhance the shopping experience . STATEMENT #14 Since all open space is private , it will be owned and maintained by the Developer or his successors and/or assigns. STATEMENT #16 We expect to develop the project in two filings , essentially one half at a time , beginning with the North half . We will begin as soon as possible after obtaining the necessary governmental approvals , and anticipate the first filing to be complete in early summer' 1990 . 891158 STATEMENT #17 Mountain View Factory Stores shall be financed as two separate issues involving possibly more than two financial vehicles. One issue is on site improvements . The other is off site improve- ments . — — On site improvements will be financed via a construction loan through a local area bank. Permanent financing will be provided by an insurance company . Off site improvements may be financed through joint efforts of the state highway commission, and a newly formed municipality or the developer via formation a special improvement district . All utilities except sewer are to the site , therefore , the major consideration for off site improvements deals with improvements to the existing frontage road adjacent to filing one of Mountain View Factory Stores . Sewer will be executed to the site from existing lines as a Seller cost . Storm detention is being provided by the developer of Crossroads Business Park in a dedicated green belt area East of the project. Storm water will be transferred to the detention area via closed pipe and an open ditch. 891158 GRANT, BERNARD, LYONS & GADDIS WALLACE H. GRANT ATTORNEYS AT LAW DENVER OFFICE OAN,EL E BERNARD SIB KIMSARrc STREET RICHARD N. LYONS, II 1801 YORK STREET JEFFREY J. KAHN ROST OFFICE BOX 978 DENVER, COLORADO 80206 H. WILLIAM SIMS, JR. LONGMONT, COLORADO 80502-0078 13031 399-'122 JOHN W. CADDIS THOMAS J. OVERTON LONGMONT (303) 776-9900 SJZAN O. FRITCHEL DENVER METRO 1303) 571-5506 BRETT J. LAMBERT TELECOPIER 1303) 772-6105 August 15, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning Department - 915 10th Street, Room 342 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Crossroads PUD Dear Rod: I am writing in connection with the Crossroads PUD application recently submitted by Donald R. Slack of Slack Ellermann Architects, P.C. on behalf of Arrowstone Development Corporation. There are three matters which I wanted to address. 1 . Law enforcement authority. As required by the PUD rezoning, we will be submitting a request to the Weld County Commissioners to establish a Law Enforcement Authority pursuant to the Law Enforcement Authority Act of 1969 (C.R.S. 30-11-401 , et. seq. ) . Our request will be to establish the Law Enforcement Authority to include at least the northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. and such other property as the County Commissioners and we agree upon. Grant Brothers supports the creation of the Authority and will do everything which we are able to do to assure its creation. 2. Road Improvements. A traffic analysis addendum to the Traffic Impact Study submitted by Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig (October 1988) was submitted with the PUD application. Arrowstone Development Corporation will be responsible for any frontage road improvements adjacent to its site and Grant Brothers and Arrowstone will be responsible for the financing and construction of other improvements which may be required by the Arrowstone Project and agreed upon with the County and State Highway Departments. 3. Weed Control . The portion of the Crossroads at Del Camino PUD not included in the recent PUD submittal will continue to be farmed. All weeds will be controlled, as they have been in the past, both in the fields and along roads and ditches. Please let me know if you need any further information or expansion on the comments made above. Very truly yours, allace H. GranWHG:kc Fr �� DAT5\WHG\GRANB-L.ALL "J `�,ILn1?')1Cst'' via TELECOPIER f r �1 REGULAR MAIL II!, AUG 7 1989 891158 1, &Ili Cf(- PLumwc ,,7),lu. (.. David J. Faestel <117@WST-O>NE president THE ARROWSTONE CORPORATIONS 5613 OTC Parkway • Suite 870 • Englewood,CO 80111 • 303-741-6100 Telefax • 303-741-6981 Telex • 6502877011 (AB)MCIUW August 15, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Dept. of Planning Services Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Crossroads PUD Dear Rod: I am writing in regard to a letter that you received from Mr. Wallace H.Grant dated August 15, 1989 . In that letter it is stated that Grant Brothers and Arrowstone will be responsible for financing and construction of the improvements within Crossroads PUD. As stated in the letter, please be advised that Arrowstone will only be responsible for improvements within its Phase I boundary and only immediately adjacent to the Phase I site. I just wanted no misunderstanding in this matter between all parties concerned. Thank you. Regards, ARROWSTONE) DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DJF: ldl cc: Wallace H. Grant 891158 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RE: TITLE NO: H447236 1002 17TH AVE. PROPERTY: LONGMONT, COLORADO 80501 SELLER: FIFTHCOFF COMPANY 772-9164 BORROWER: GRANT BROTHERS DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989 GRANT,BERNARD,LYONS AND GADDIS ATTN: WALLY GRANT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE MATTER, WE ARE ENCLOSING HEREWITH THE FOLLOWING: XX TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT MORTGAGE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY OWNERS TITLE INSURANCE POLICY LEASEHOLD LOAN TITLE INSURANCE POLICY LEASEHOLD OWNERS TITLE INSURANCE POLICY CONTRACT PURCHASER'S POLICY CONSTRUCTION LOAN COMMITMENT CONSTRUCTION LOAN POLICY ENDORSEMENT(S) TAX CERTIFICATES) IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS STATEMENT OF CHARGES LIEN INDEMNITY LETTER WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE BEEN OF SERVICE TO YOU. PLEASE CONTACT THE UNDER- SIGNED IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS TRANSACTION. CO: ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS ATTN: BARBARA OLTIC - COLORADO SPRINGS 121 E. VERMIJO AVE. P.O. BOX 609 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO. 80901 ATT: JOE VERY TRULY YOURS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE CO. 891158 BY: STEPL:A' - :?OKAY COP. :MENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A ORDER NO. H447236 COMMITMENT NO. 1 . EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 1989 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT PREMIUM (A) ALTA OWNER'S POLICY -PROPOSED INSURED: $ 4,060,000.00 $ 3,694.03 GRANT BROTHERS, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP (B) ALTA LOAN POLICY - PROPOSED INSURED: $ $ TAX CERTIFICATE S 5.00 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN FIFTHCOFF COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 11 , TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONTAINED IN DECREE RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1904 IN BOOK 214 AT PAGE 169; AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1958 IN BOOK 1505 AT PAGE 504, ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 500 FEET OF THE WEST 1 ,679.5 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY L---1-002 17TH AVE. LONGMONT, COLORADO-B0501 891158 VALID ONLY IF SCHEDULE B AND COVER ARE ATTACHED CHEDULE B - SECTION 1 TITLE NO. H447236 THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: 1 .. INSTRUMENT CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND FILED FOR RECORD, TO-WIT: (A) DULY AUTHORIZED WARRANTY DEED FROM FIFTHCOFF COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION VESTING FEE SIMPLE TITLE IN GRANT BROTHERS, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. 2. PAY THE FULL CONSIDERATION TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF, THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS. 3. PAY ALL TAXES, CHARGES, ASSESSMENTS, LEVIED AND ASSESSED AGAINST SUBJECT PREMISES, WHICH ARE DUE AND PAYABLE. 891158 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 TITLE NO. H447236 SCHEDULE B OF THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY: 1 . RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGES IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES WOULD DISCLOSE AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. ANY LIEN OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CL-AIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 6. ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. 7. RIGHT OF WAY FOR COUNTY ROADS 30 FEET WIDE ON EITHER SIDE OF SECTION AND TOWNSHIP LINES AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1889 IN BOOK 86 AT PAGE 273. 8. RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 9, 1938 IN BOOK 1024 AT PAGE 336, SAID RIGHT OF WAY BEING COMMENCING AT THE NW CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11 ; THENCE ALONG WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, S 00°26' W, A DISTANCE OF 23 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SOUTH ROW LINE ON COUNTY SIDE ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 00°261 W ALONG NEW RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2,624.00 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST SECTION LINE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE HALF SECTION LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID HALF SECTION LINE 27 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG OLD ROW LINE FENCE OF PRESENT ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 2,624.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH PROPERTY FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 27 FEET, MORE OR LESS, THE THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 9. RIGHT OF WAY PIPELINE PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO WYCO PIPE LINE COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 13, 1947 IN BOOK 1199 AT PAGE 429, SAID RIGHT OF WAY NOT BEING SPECIFICALLY DEFINED. 10. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 1969 IN BOOK 619 AS RECEPTION NO. 1540699, SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT BEING A STRIP OF LAND 16 1/2 FEET IN WIDTH IN THAT PART OF THE N 1/2 OF SECTION 11 . (Continued) NOTE: EXCEPTIONS ---- WILL NOT APPEAR IN THE LOAN POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER. THE OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE COMMITTED FOR IN THIS COMMITMENT, IF ANY, SHALL CONTAIN, IN ADDITION TO THE ITEMS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ( 1 ) THE DEED OF TRUST, IF ANY, REQUIRED UNDER SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 , ITEM (B) . (2) UNPATENTED "1INING CLAIMS; RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF. (3) ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. 891.1..58 SCHEDULE B-2 - Exceptions ( tinued) 11 . OIL AND GAS LEASE FROM -HELEN M. GRANT, FERN M. WIKSTRAND AND VICTOR E. WIKSTRAND TO MARTIN J. -FREEDMAN, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1970 IN BOOK 633 AS RECEPTION NO. 1554542 AND ANY INTERESTS THEREIN, ASSIGNMENTS OR CONVEYANCES THEREOF. 12. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 IN BOOK 1110 AS RECEPTION NO. 2050717, SAW RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT BEING A 10 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT ADJACENT TO AND PARALLELING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF AND PARALLELING THE WEST. 13. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT FOR WATER TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION LINE OR SYSTEM GRANTED TO CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DITRICT BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 31 , 1988 IN BOOK 1191 AS RECEPTION NO. 2136298. 14. EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED TO SAINT VRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 6, 1989 IN BOOK 1234 AS RECEPTION NO. 2181781 . 891158 • Commitment For Title Insurance Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, herein called the company, for a valuable con- sideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as ownerMr mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 120 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Company has caused its Corporate Name andSeal to be hereunto affixed;this instrument, including Commitment, Conditions and Stipulations attached,to become valid when countersigned by an Authorized Officer or Agent of the Company. �PNpSIT( , COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY as Attest: _ !g G By rl 3io stig_d___ 42,, •kHai;* By President Conditions and Stipulations I. The term mortgage,when used herein,shall include deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. NM 6 891158 American Land Title A«sunion Cmnmilmem 1966 U Cover Page Form 1004-S LONGMONT TITLE COMPANYinc. 229 Terry Street,P.O.Box 2058,Longmont,Colorado 80501 (3031651.1401 Metro 443-1011 DATE: July 27, 1989 Our Ref: Surrounding Property Report Your Ref: Fi fthcoff Company TO: Rocky Mountain Consultants Attn: Barb Brunk The following is a Statement Only of the names of the property owners described in the last recorded Deed purporting to affect the real property below and the property within 500 feet of said property. Owner: Fifthcoff Company, a Colorado Corporation and Grant Brothers, a Partnership Legal Description: The North 1/2 of Section 11 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado. Owners of the Property within 500 feet of the above described parcel : See Attached Exhibit "A" This Statement is not a Certificate of Title and does not reflect change of owner- ship caused by death or court proceedings, and as this Statement is furnished for a nominal fee, the Company assumes no liability beyond the amount paid for this Statement. perely, �arm R. Davis ident JRD/kao LONGMONT'S SERVINGBOULD R, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES Y 891158 EXHIBIT "A" Booth, Gary S. & Mark C. Martinka-Farrell Partnership Texaco, Inc. P 0 Box 386 P 0 Box 179 Tax Dept. Ault, Co. 80610 Longmont, Co. 80501 P 0 Box 7813 Universal City, CA. 91608 St. Vrain Land Company Schmoll Construction, Inc. Mc Donalds Corp. 6999 York St. 601 N. Front P 0 Box 741 P 0 Box 66207 Amf O'Hare Denver, Co. 80229 Townsend, MT. 59644 Airport Chicago, IL. 60666 England, Robert Lewis Rite-A-Way Industries, Inc. Burger Avenue Inv. Ltd. 4969 WCR 24 % Joel Wiens 125 S. Homes 5th Floor Longmont, Co. 80501 Box 760 Ft. Collins, Co. 80521 Kimball , NE. 69145 Gordan, Larry Burger Avenue Inv. , Ltd. Power Wash Inv. Ltd. II Stan Schneider 211 W. Magnolia % Angelo Dimotsantos 10351 Santa Monica Blvd. #300 Fort Collins, Co. 80521 300 W53 Pl . Unit E Los Angeles, CA. 90025 Denver, Co. 80216 New Creation Ministries & Dalton, I S Co. Longmont Partnership II World Outreach Center Church PO Box 1287 % Super 8 Motel , Inc. 737 dross Longmont, Co. 80501 10805 Turner Blvd. Longmont, Co. 80501 Longmont, Co. 80501 Kahn, Milton L. & Edwin S. Susuras, Helen 6750 E. Eastman Av. Box 84 Olson Land & Cattle Co. Denver, Co. 80224 Dacono, Co. 80514 4306 Weld Co. Rd. 22 Longmont, Co. 80501 Evers, Clarence J. & Vivian P. Sherwood, Donald J. Hill , Jack E. & Margaret E. 1203 Princeton Ct. 120 9 Av. Etal Longmont, Co. 80501 Longmont, Co. 80501 4739 Weld County Rd. #22 Longmont, Co. 80501 Fahrenholtz, Ronald L. & Dalton, C. Richard & Mary H. Azalea Farms, Ltd. Darlene F. P 0 Box 36 % Edwin M. McDowell , Jr. 1119 Windslow Circle Newark, MO 63458 4862 Kellogg Circle Longmont, Co. 80501 Boulder, Co. 80303 Chevron USA, Inc. D Q Restaurants of Colo. Ltd. Hurt, Wilbur R. & Shirley Property Tax Section 300 W. 53 P1 . Unit E 14278 Co. Rd. #7 3336 East 32 St. Denver, Co. 80216 Longmont, Co. 80501 Tulsa, OK. 74135 Mustard & Associates Taggart, Mary B. & Virgil L. Trust, U/W Carl R. Oswald P 0 Box 53 El Rancho 150 Sunlight Cr. Route 1 14707 N. 95 St. Golden, Co. 80401 Livermore, Co. 80536 Longmont, Co. 80501 891158 Neighbors, Donald A. 10140 Weld Co. Rd. 11 Longmont, Co. 80501 Johnson, George & Dorothy R. 3838 S. Jasmine St. Denver, Co. 80237 891158 nc engineers • planners • surveyors • August 2, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning Dept. 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Rod, I hereby certify that the grading drainage and utility design for the Mountain View Factory Stores P.U.D. has been completed by me or under my direct supervision. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS vtiet... Kurt Rollin, P.E. KR:klr 43WELDCTY.LTRs\., acs••0 N m E.aG, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 1960 Industrial Circle, Suite A, Longmont, Colorado 80501 303-772.5282 Offices also in Denver and Estes Park, CO Metro line: 665-6283 Fax No. 665.6959 891158 Mountain View Factory Stores Utility Demand Statement Water: 5,000 gallons per day Sewer: 2,900 gallons per day Gas: 19,000 cubic feet per hour (19,000,000 B.T.U. ) Electricity: 6,400 KW (17,000 Amps) DEPT8\ETC\11 . 1\ARR0W.LEG 891158 • flc engineers • planners • surveyors August 4, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Drainage Plan and Calculations - Mountain View Factory Stores Dear Rod: As part of the Final P.U.D. submittal for Mountain View Factory Stores, we have provided a grading and drainage plan, and calculations for the site. Three (3) copies of this plan have been submitted for your review. The 100 and 10 year storm runoff quantities were calculated using the Rational Method (Q=CIA) . Values for the Runoff Coefficients (C) and Rainfall Intensities (I ) were taken from charts provided by the Boulder County Storm Drainage Criteria Manual . A copy of these charts are provided to you with the site drainage calculations. Detention storage for the site was calculated using the Equation Detention Method as developed by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. A copy of the explanation of this method is also provided as part of the drainage calculations. The runoff released from the detention ponds on the site will be carried by an on-site storm sewer system that will release into a temporary waste ditch that will carry runoff through the rest of the Crossroads - Del Camino site to Godding Hollow Ditch. Due to grading constraints, this ditch will carry approximately 40 percent of the 100 year release flow from the site. Any overflow from the ditch will naturally sheet flow across the Crossroads - Del Camino site to Godding Hollow Ditch. If you have any questions on the grading and drainage design or the utility plan design, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, • ROCKY MOUNTAIN CO ULTANTS, INC. Kurt Rollin, P.E. KR:sp Enclosure EPT8ETC/3/MNTVIEW.LTR Rocky mountain uonsultants, Inc. 1960 Industrial Circle, Suite A, Longmont, Colorado 80501 303-772.5282 Offices also in Denver and Estes Park, CO Metro line: 665-6283 Fax No. 665-6959 891158 vac ROCKY MO' TAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. ��.n •Professional Engineers• �iJC/ ,CLIENT: J1/DST r3L- JOB NO.: V2"1Z'°' ;• '» SHEET / OF 3 n DESCRIPTION: 'ArN .6 l___FIJ"JJ'f}-'TS1J/JS DESIGNED BY: Kr DATE:/1W:• J I'i�a ( 'JO {_ _j V r L1J r C- aC—✓ 1: r E,�, CHECKED BY: DATE: �\ 1 J'7Df4: ...d4 Ledo ii- 0/i - - T5.Tt3 }7 -- 7 J :•ANJcs vL /Trr4 - `19 F, = 2cJ % r-. /l--'! /f j—/JJ.-L / ,Pi��£ 6 3 Z /*2( f !JF i — io _ • I C� / C rod _ 0 •GO / isp _ I F-01_ CA.JD SC/DPC / f• 1 " , "4 -; i,J l JI Zo Curley o� = p. LID F0c-' rim 7 € - t _ /J = 'D � i_D, ,rQ,c� E0. ',e , -r�.v6 - „ i loo - (0.?i(o.61 )(o (9 ?I>, 0 ,?b - -- N LJA'It6" c OF JC&Ft a — .A-rt- J / Poe_ 7� cry L-� rid),) f/1 n+ or r / _,err Jcc Pipit 6-,JA, -TL = lO Alt.) 891158 Rine ROCKY MO' TAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professional Engineers* r CLIENT: C vJSiwo JOB NO.: 4Z"f Z7J,OOI.JO SHEET Z OF 3 Vn DESCRIPTION: ti'"rJJA :22 a/1Li---r"---0/3 i DESIGNED BY: N2- DATE:kg,, '4. )oo•q /71 2jtn '� ✓J Jrkr l �- �'_-� .' � � 1'%; CHECKED BY: DATE: cuomt SbZ — &CS0U/ . Pc,. 570 1� = 10 /:tr- . - r _ — �o ;. b j_•-- IOD y . ii �D, E JPJ OF F 0,7 j o "D �_ f ✓1 ',37)(1---:-)` c ~ .D,)-Dr/ ./ l' c ,.J 1.4 ' c-A r -- I— J J :J - �.� / .) .r,1J:-, ,4ti - _ = 1O 4.2L-S - = = CD 891158 'mc ROCKY MOV TAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. •Professional Engineers• CLIENT: / : fi�U-�i� � JOB NO.: Lt.:: "It al 7�-001 .00 SHEET J OF 3 DESCRIPTION: 1.�—s�LC. DESIGNED BY: DATE: "j' — i I DJN"(_::-.N\ 'Jr} CHECKED BY: DATE: (0�1 , , I3,7p = I ,SZ Fr D /4FF-XTi.1y4 L.c.-,:t/`S.4- 24-7S . — (off - JO A = = 1-3 ,7 Cps SL - 5 231,30 5 - c-;-L ft- 11w/"vE_ o� C\ 1/2-. ADD 6A-c)+ ocr r F- CA/L/-<)6 T ;4- 891158 )ULDER COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL TABLE 6O1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND PERCENT IMPERVIOUS RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS LAND USE OR PERCENT FREQUENCY SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS IMPERVIOUS 2 5 10 100 Business: Commercial Areas 95 .87 .87 .88 .89 Neighborhood Areas 70 .60 .65 .70 .80 Residential : Single-Family Figure-603 .40 .45 .50 .60 Multi-Unit (detached) 50 .45 .50 .60 .70 Multi-Unit (attached) 70 .60 .65 .70 .80 1/2 Acre Lot or Larger Figure-603 .30 .35 .40 .60 Apartments 70 .65 .70 .70 .80 Industrial : Light Areas 80 .71 .72 .76 .82 Heavy Areas 90 .80 .80 .85 .90 Parks, Cemetaries 7 .10 . 10 .35 .60 Playgrounds 13 .15 .25 .35 .65 Schools 50 .45 .50 .60 .70 Railroad Yard Areas 40 .40 .45 .50 .60 Undeveloped Areas : Historic Flow Analysis 2 (see "Lawns") Greenbelts, Agricultural 0ffsite Flow Analysis 45 .43 .47 .55 .65 (when land use not defined) Streets: d 100 .87 .88 .90 .93 Gravel 13 .15 .25 .35 .65 Drives and Walks 96 .87 .87 .88 .89 Roofs 90 .80 .85 .90 .90 Lawns, Sandy Soil 0 .00 .01 .05 .20 Lawns, Clayey Soil 0 .05 .10 .20 .40 NOTE: The Rational Formula coefficients do not apply for larger basins where the time-of-concentration exceeds 60 minutes. WRC ENG. REFERENCE: USDCM DRC0G Rev. May 1, 1984 891158 -632- BOULDER COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL FIGURE 501 RAINFALL ZONES SCALE IO 5 0 IOMILES I: 500,000 $ \ O LARIMER o COUNTY o °o o y; % LYONS ALL. bK .. G;, IVIII 7 II I _L NGMONT o" WELD ? COUNTY AR• S GRAND COUNTY V .:; 7 BOULOa. u r _LAFAYETT 7 .. ', _�� COUNTY ADAMS .. S LOUISVILLE y 8 0 o GILPIN m b COUNTY JEFFERSON 11 COUNTY • 891158 WRC ENG. REFERENCE: Base map from USGS map for State of Colorado, Rev 1980 „u- BOULDER COUNTY - STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL FIGURE 502 TIME-INTENSITY-FREQUENCY CURVES ZONE I I . -- - . I 1 8tQ I• • • -- ::: i 1 � . — , 1 1 I I I • 0 _ - Z p ! . a •t. 1- -a t — I , . • i 1 . # I I::- gJ6.Q : : . _ _ _ I . L I 1 •• : - I =. {{ ILI I I _= v . .. =_ . ss 5.0 1 : I d I I • , I. + L 40- +- f i = J _ 3.0 to 2.4 .: 1 ' 11;—I I 11A YE4W — b YZAfi :::- I I 1.Q I I . i I 2:Y_AR: I I I a I ! .."- 1_ 4 ' 10 ,• ,i- - _3O_. _ 40 140 1 ' E-OFiC• C-NTRATION. t0 [ MINUTES 3 1 I I I WRC ENG. REFERENCE: WRC TM-1 NOV. 1983 891158 -510- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property: The N 1/2, Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. GRANT, BERNARD, LYONS & GADDIS allace H. Grant, Attorney Reg. No 1554 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this / - day of 7%/i- i!% , 1989. Witness by hand and official seal . My Commission expires: /7////),- ii/ �. Notary Public WHG:kc DAT5\RE\GRANB-AF.PUD 080189 891158 EXHIBIT A TO: AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE The following is a list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the N1/2 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. 1 . Mineral Owners: Same as surface owners. 2. Lessees: The following individuals and/or entities have leasehold interests in the oil and gas rights underlying the property: Machii - Ross Petroleum Company Suite 3070, 3420 Ocean Park Boulevard Santa Monica, California 90405-3305 Vessels Oil and Gas Company/Thomas Vessels Suite 2000, Prudential Plaza 1050 - 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80205 Adolph Coors Company Golden, Colorado 80401 Grant Brothers P.O. Box 948 Longmont, Colorado 80501 WHG:pkf\kc DAT5\RE\GRANB-XA.AFF 101288\080189 891158 �, QDkdf�(�-Iit ) iY °e co \,"Q) J y ° WE-89-0004 ROY R. ROMER �* �"' JOHN W. BOLD GOVERNOR <1,87c 8;% DIRECTOR COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING- 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 60203 PHONE (303) 866-2611 November 8, 1988 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Planning 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: RE: CROSSROADS DEL CAP'IINO PUD We have reviewed the materials submitted on this proposal and the general and engineering geology of the site. There appear to be no geology-related problems or constraints associated with this property, given detailed planning and adequate engineering practice. We, therefore, have no objection to the approval of this PUD and zone change. As is the case for most of Colorado, the potential for radon accumulation in occupied structures should be mitigated as part of the development plan. Yours truly, Jeffrey L. Hynes Senior Engineering Geologist vjr:JLH-89-028 I , NOV 1d 1988 I I... I GEOLOGY TAG STORY OF THE PAST... KEY TO THE FUTURE 'v",:""' r""'� 891153 STATE OF COLORADO S. S. CERTIFI' TE OF TAXES DUE I mCOUNTY Or .JELD I, the undersigned, County Treasurer in and for said County, do hereby certify that there are no unpaid taxes, or unredeemed tax sales,as appears of record in the office,on the following described property, to-wit: rR NO. 'ARCEL ri. • _ • ... DAME 621 .. I "e°64 t' i THCI.:}Fr I„I JENDOR EXCEPT— : This does not include land or improvements assessed separately or special District assessments unless specifically requested. FRANCIS M. LOUSTALET 891155 T ASURER OF WELD COUNTY By \\A+00,L_J l�C� Hello