The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About890743.tiff ID ill ('•eliKiA J ,.biked a9r w.r.G .,N, -44'f' 4' '- ' I. ,�_ .,:r ppile'"s3 3 �ii I F== • H � F s . `i FF r1 01i- F ? eii `i - • .. 1 g i.7s 3%I 11 er..,III riffII LIII f.ie s i,i 1. r 3 377- f. • 'i.! ii fLi F vii" I; .. a�f5ic'. 5:1. ii1{E:s! s -fj'; i 33 3.3IFe1.: iF33 3y'aa.F :3Fiy.i i rei� 1I if �� ' }j Ii M 1ff t r• j iil k i•, l i�si i F� .i r i J 1} qy ii i ii�3 A =' ei at 4 f ' ..ir I i r. +i e1 f! t :: � Ill .I3i ::. 5 • ai Lai ! (" all il LIIIIIIIIII ! IIII ; II AAA:11't11:a1^ 1Aa .. fA. � �I� IJI �Littitil ��d f A, !gl± ill i 1 ri 1e ;rllla±i li+.i 'il i' I � I HI .i ! ! i i I ,Z it: iti tl i { i ti, t'P f ¢i;.,iii t filli ; llii � � ; 1 . . I. 4.iiE :`; ii ; �Slii I'�lai 't; I l I : A.t 1 1 ,:, :' ra ai tap 1 r',1,1 ;1: r. ' i ii. ;'.r i 1 I� :F' �i ±II Irri (� $. i ,,il. i ll.1. it.i;±i ;isl.i, =1-; 4s i�-it` I€1 '45' . i{{ ,3ci' F: lit t I !i; ! t i:'±I. it±' -`` ' i9!' t ,it!, =it:,a I `it'i1 i,!iii. ir. ,,:l f•. v i r:i±1-±i Pr iii il`I0 i�ii~ii± I I •+or' �t. f e' �! h.„;=:..I ,I iii iifi TO i.e.11ii; :tip • f �• Q i . r , , ;lr1:il;Ai tl ii tij ti;iiil,Ilii Ihll)ll,i i iil lry _II r+� a t�, i�et₹! i !1 'r�!j i 71 at :ti :C F _ S [' gF 0' �' �l r• • ` 1`'•,i lii I.-P q Ii i:ii: i 'i it I:. :'t i, lei -� i C ;I l iriiiii l 'i± i is..1 i !ii: S rr.' i;5, ..i 'r13 I ti l'!i, 1 44 j I'e tt "! .. .• . II l ,.ice~ :i'i /��ill i, li tif! i i ii ilft p @ :: i iii!i!!!;j Ii T ,•` I'lil gl:i Fiji C- • r• t r i i• 1 •j ill f1 (t 11. t iti ij is#i•ii;1 ± ii.iffy•I1i.,I 6Y. • . 1 —• + — • ',pill ti;It M.3.i 71 ti:i.ii:J1i; t ; i 'i t 3 QQniL.1 2 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR RECREATIONAL FACILITY (PRIVATE SKI LAKE) LOCATED IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 26th day of July, 1989 , at the hour of 10 : 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer, 5630 West 71st Circle, Arvada, Colorado 80003 , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the NE* , Section 13 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Bob Kramer was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24 .4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24 . 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: Pit 04' 6 890743 Page 2 RE: USR - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. a. This proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of Firestone and is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan ' s Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies . The Tri-Area Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on June 7, and recommended approval. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District. The proposed use is a recreational ski lake and is provided for as a Use by Special Review in the Agricultural Zone District. c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production and rural residences. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Development Standards will ensure adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder' s office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 890743 Page 3 RE: USR - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. 3. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: a. A signed copy of the letter from Alan D. Gillan, Gillan' s Engineering, Inc. , included in Appendix E of the application, shall be submitted and shall include the engineer' s registration stamp. b. The Special Review Permit plat shall be amended to show the relocation of the boat dock at least 150 feet from any oil or gas well. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded , adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of July, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder / r�-fr and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kir C irman BY: j ,�/2/ W ue e J son, Pro-Tem Deputy aunty erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Br ntner George a ne County Attorney Gor a 890743 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Lakeview Village, Inc. c/o Bob Kramer USR-881 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a recreational ski lake in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. This application is for Lakeview Village, Inc. , a private recreational ski club consisting of not more than twelve shareholders. 2 . Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 , C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . All liquid and solid wastes , shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4 . Water quality in the lake shall be monitored monthly to ensure compliance with Sections 4 . 5 and 4. 6 of the State of Colorado, Regulations and Standards Governing Swimming Pools, Swimming Areas. The results of such tests shall be submitted to the Weld County Health Department by the 30th of each month for its review. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 6. Fugitive dust shall be confined to this site. The construction site shall be reseeded in grass by June, 1990 . 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 dB (A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8 . Vaulted toilets or an individual sewage disposal system shall be required for the proposed facility and the system shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 9. All pumps, pits, and oil and gas production facilities shall be adequately fenced with a six-foot chain-link fence with three barbed wire strands on top to prevent trespassing. Gates to the enclosures are to be locked at all times except when operators are present. 890743 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. 10 . The reservoirs shall be operated in accordance with the conditions of the decree of Water Court Case No. 85CW443. The reservoirs are subject to administration and water may not be impounded during periods of a senior call on the South Platte River System. During these periods, all inflow, _precipitation, etc. must be released and returned to the river without use. 11 . The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be notified prior to the placement of dredged or fill material into the completed lakes. The conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be complied with. 12. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 13. Prairie dogs and mosquitoes shall be kept to a minimum and not become a public nuisance. 14 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24. 5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 15. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 16 . Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services, Longmont Fire Protection District, State Engineer Division of Water Resources, State Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and the Army Corps of Engineers shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations . 17. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services . 890743 -Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. 18 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. _Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 890743 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-31 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR A RECREATIONAL FACILITY (PRIVATE SKI LAKE) LOCATED IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. A public hearing was conducted on July 26, 1989, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison planning Department representative, Brian Bingle The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated June 26, 1989, and duly published July 13, 1989, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Lakeview Village, Inc. , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Brian Bingle, representing the Planning Department, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Bob Kramer, representing the applicant, explained that currently eight families are members of Lakeview Village, Inc. They have purchased 80 acres and have almost completed construction of two reservoirs, which they wish to use to practice slalom course water skiing. Mr. Kramer said they have no problem with the recommended Conditions and Development Standards. During the resulting discussion, Mr. Bingle said the application is for a private ski lake only, and use as a competition ski lake would require amendment of the Permit. It was also discussed that the application materials state that there would be no more than two boats at any time and that a shareholder must be present any time the reservoirs are in use. Harold Hollaway, a nearby landower who owns 20% of the water in the McCormick Seep Ditch, came forward and said the applicant had converted water from the ditch into the reservoirs. After discussion concerning water rights, Mr. Kramer stated that the State Engineer had told them to re—route the ditch, and that they own six shares of the Lower Boulder Water Company. Mr. Kramer also explained their expected sources of water. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the request of Lakeview Village, Inc. , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit subject to the Conditions and Development Standards recommended by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. 890743 Page 2 HEARING CERTIFICATION - LAKEVIPW VILLAGE, INC. This C-ertification .was approved on the 31st day o₹ July, 1989. APPROVED: jn/ , 7/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: tfilaitai ^" fit ""� +� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Boa C.M. irby, Cha" an By: / beputy Vuaty Cl f a. .ydr li John:o , Pro-Tem ene R. Brantner eR ' George Kenne Go . a y TAPE #89-30 DOCKET #89-31 PL0476 890743 ATTENDANCE R C O P 3; PLEASE write er print legibly yeur name , addrese and the name of the -applicant or Docket 4 for the hearing you are -attending. TODAY' S -HEARINGS ARE AS TOLLOWS: JULY 26, 1989 DOCKET # 89-31 USR-RECREATIONAL FACILITY (PRIVATE SKI LAKE) IN THE -A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT - LAK-EVIEW VILLAG-E, INC. DOCKET # DOCKET # NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING ) .� 3( Q !� C. K�,�_1?-g / J �%/�'/�11_ � `� �L,/� �C�� O if � " 5) }'f i lz,4i4$4, LJ,/Son 41'S65 LIL,e /5 !.'9-.i-n-me-, 4 co g osic, 1 ?5' -3/ Vi7v` 1R-F tail— Sox z 5 I 6rre (e f Co 8no g - 3 j tioi. 4 sc.{ dvi v c 1 l 2_041'1 t�.i'r�✓1 'u2!< TY>tl f t L / - d _3" ` `!-3/ b?ao21(Tay 4-Me estn! joY.53't �7sy�4T,F !Ji'do aa `3 i --r")/cK I 7-R7 f__: ?J_ C=r e-e 47 Cc,. Sci 3� itith0743 PUBLIC NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on July 26, 1989, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for the property and -purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 14, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Lakeview Village, Inc. c% Bob Xramer 5630 Vest 7st Circle Arvada, Colorado 80003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tart of the NE} of Section 13, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (-Agricultural) lone District SIZE OF PARCEL: 80 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will -result in a forfeiture of the vested property tight. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN EEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: August 3, 1989, in -The New News 390743 PUBLIC NOTICE _Board of County CCoommieM of Weld INS Colorado, on July 26'approved a �u Site elopment Plan and a Review Permit forr the cwKty and purpone el of this c61e�b�w.CooN�rthed vested In Articleero TWe ,C.R3.,as gill B amedkd,ffoorr-a of three ys 771sstt.pfCircle,--Arrva(da, Colorado 80001. :Part of the I 1/4 of_Sect(m/3 Township Bfh [North, se West of the P Pip-AND Colorado. OF USE; AAeeaa�tiered fiWlft (privitte ski in the A (WcWmrn)Zone District. SIZE OF -PARCEL: 80 acres, less Palace to aNdee by the terms and conditions off-approval-will vested {pia tyMdp�. of the rig�COMW SONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO BY:MARY-ANN F�EUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND / -RECORDER AND T CLERIC HE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff,ew News L 47 COX 890743 DEPARTMcNT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1 PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 'e 915 10th STREET ri0 �t GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Imi „ ' j ■l Y`R.. f L C. �� VII N7 c use 881 COLORADO �h' . JUL 1 2 1989 May 15, 19T9 �( ' 'NL'IU Lii 'kl;,;i-''w wlAuhis>suu TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application -from Lakeview Village, Incorporated, c/o Bob Kramer for a Tita Specific Development Plan -and a Special -Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE of Section 13, T2N, 1R68W of the 6th T.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile north of the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld -County -Road 22. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider -relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt -reply will help to facilitate the -processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration -of your -recommendation. Please reply by May 3D, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your rec_mmendation. Pleas call -Brian J. Tingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and -return to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive -Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive P1-an, but we feel this -request (is/is -not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. xx We have -reviewed the _request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. -A formal recommendation is under consideration and will the submitted to you prior to: 5. A Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: .,Lj �t-ZP cAgency: Tri-Area Planning Commission Secrete L., 111413 Date: June 8, 1989 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 13th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development P1en and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make -a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will $e kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at lease five ;lays prior to the -hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so -certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may -be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, Located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPITCANT DOCKET NO. 89-31 Lakeview Village, Inc. c/o Bob Kramer 5630 West 71st Circle Arvada, Colorado 80003 DATE: July 26, 1989 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit - Recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NFl of Section 13, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of the Town of Firestone; west of Weld County -Road 13 and south of Weld County -Road 22 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTETN COUNTY _CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Ieputy DATED: June 26, 1989 PUBLISHED: July 13, 1989, An The New News il743 Ex Nib , � a site otyttt000 Ordinance, Wr�W hsCounty a og will held i�� Center, 51=In1eZ 55 1 at_ S sett,,t Firet st time Floor,µ Inter All odium r my manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are .. - llror�sgasur�ddes,ted to attend and may be Mad the applicant or any in_. m re r�7 desire the weseacereporter to rd in mat. to lancet which will he ept the te Board's in writing .. of e�10 action at least Se.�days prior to the hearing.a ppe n3'_court reporter The rag be tbe _ WeldCamdy�Pt the pe,} eraminedJn the office of ilrra;aunts it�eedDrllivn� street Third Flloor, . t]D(N;lil:'1'Wo1 Lakeview Witt, T -trier,A�rva , Colorado .TIh1E' 00 lf1 [1E1S: A. ( Development mi plaza find a boil_ District 1in, A1,(pliant. eeuul WM) located 5g-REl/1 d ga�y�l13N; Part db th M ON. sypnths .5 miles north�n -o jinni of Firestone; wed of RBead 1.3 and ead 8 County south-of11e1d Camty Rest S2 BOARD CO Wi AND AIR' la—Eke A1,.(1*{6 890743 DATE: June 26, 1-989 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the -Board Office Commissioners : If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 26th day of July, 198?) , at 10 : 00 A M Docket No. 89-31 - Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District — Lakeview Village, Inc. OFFICE OF THE CLE TO THE BOARD BY: Deputy L The above mentioned hearing date arid hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO/ ttie L 890743 Exh , t 0 Summary of the weld County Planning Commission Meeting June 20, 1989 Page 3 CASE NUMBER: USR-881 APPLICANT: Lakeview Village, Incorporated, c/o Bob Kramer REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEi of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22. APPEARANCE: Bob Kramer, applicant, represented the shareholders. At the present time, there are no plans to hold competitive events. The shareholders may occasionally use their campers or tents, but shareholders are limited to 2ight members and their immediate families. They would like to have the option to increase the shareholders to twelve sometime in the future. They _ have obtained all necessary permits from the state to construct and fill the ponds. Any water in the lakes will be in excess of water -needed for irrigation. Also, at sometime in the future, they swill probably apply for a planned unit development on this property. All mufflers on the boats are "wet type" and are very subdued. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Bill Kinney, surrounding property owner, stated he objects to this request. Tape 346 - Side 1 - It is not aesthetic, the lakes look like industrial pools. Other area residents are also opposed to this. Jerry Nelson, surrounding property owner, reported he is against this request. • John Veno, Lot 10, Buffalo Acres, is concerned about environmental factors and increased noise level. If noise and -possible health haz-ands are controlled he has no objections. Larry Abbott, area resident, -expressed his concern about the high water table in the area. Minnette Paul, surrounding property owner, agrees with other concerns expressed by area residents. She is also concerned about contamination of • the wells and an increased water table affecting the septic systems. 890743 )(. 1-\‘,10 i C - Sunmary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting June 20, 1989 Page 4 Jack Hill, area resident, is not for or against either side. The Plans have - been reviewed and approved by the Army Corps of Engineers and the District 3 Water Court. Judge Behrman has also reviewed and approved the plans. He is merely interested in what is really going on and not hearsay circulating around the neighborhood. Betty Diehl, area property owner, expressed concern about the noise from the boats. lob Kramer responded to concerns of the area residents. They can only irrigate twelve acres of their property. Tape 346 - Side 2 The lakes have bean inspected and approved by all state and federal offices involved in the application process. The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. -The Chairman asked Bob Kramer if he had any objections to any of these items. He had no objections. AMENDMENT: -Lynn Brown moved Development Standard 116 be amended to read as follows: 6. Fugitive dust shall be confined to this site. The construction site shall be reseeded in grass by June, 1990. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Lynn -Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Tape 347 - Side 1 SJ 743 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting June 20, 1989 Page 5 AMENDMENT: Lynn Brown moved a new Development Standard 13 be added and the following - existing standards be renumbered accordingly. 13. Prairie dogs and mosquitos shall be kept to a minimum and not become a public nuisance. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. AMENDMENT: Jerry Kiefer moved Development Standard #1 be amended to read as follows: 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a recreational ski lake in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. This application is for Lakeview Village, Inc. , a private recreational ski club consisting of not more than twelve shareholders. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. NOTICE: 3 :40 p.m. LeAnn Reid was excused for the remainder of the meeting. AMENDMENT: Lynn Brown moved Development Standard #7 be amended to residential rather than commercial noise levels as follows: 890743 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting June 20, 1989 Page 6 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 dB(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. Motion seconded by Jerry Kiefer. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; Ann Garrison - no; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried with three voting for and one voting against the motion. MOTION: Lynn Brown moved Case Number USR-881 for Lakeview Village, Inc. , for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the Agricultural zone district he forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission' s recommendation for approved based upon the recommendation and conditions presented by the Department of Planning Services staff' , the Development Standards as presented by the staff and amended by the Planning Commission, and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. Additional Business: Chuck Cunliffe, Director, Department of Planning Services presented proposed amendments to Sections 31 , 32, and 47 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. Tape 347 - Side 2 fi 890743 r BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS !" Moved by Lynn Brown the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-881 NAME: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer ADDRESS: 5630 West 71st Circle, Arvada, CO 80003 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEi of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of the Town of Firestone; west of Weld County Road 13 and south of Weld County Road 22 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - This proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of Firestone and is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies. The Tri-Area Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on June 7, and recommended approval. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district. The proposed use is a recreational ski lake and is provided for as a use by Special review in the Agricultural zone district. - The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production and rural residences. - No overlay districts affect the site. 890743 �xh b� B Lakeview Village DSR-881 Page 2 -Special Review Development Standards will ensure adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits by issue on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: a signed copy of the letter from Alan D. Gillan, Gillan's Engineering, Inc. , included in Appendix E of the application, shall be submitted and shall include the engineer's registration stamp. the Special Review permit plat shall be amended to show the relocation of the boat dock at least 150 feet from any oil or gas well. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Jerry Kiefer Lynn Brown Ann Garrison Bud Halldorson 3J43 Lakeview Village USR-881 P-age 3 The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on June 20, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the -Planning Commission. Dated the 21st day of June, 1989. -VT ctoN -Bobbie Good Secretary US 743 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Lakeview Village, Inc. c/o Bob Kramer USR-881 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a recreational ski lake in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials -0n file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. This application is for Lakeview Village, Inc. , -a private recreational ski club consisting of not more than twelve shareholders. 2. Approval -0f this plan may _create a vested property right Tursuant to Article 68 of _Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. All liquid and solid w-astes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protect-s -against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. Water quality in the lake shall be monitored monthly to ensure compliance with Sections 4.5 and 4.6 of the State of Colorado, Regulations and Standards Governing Swimming Tools, Swimming Areas. The results of such tests shall be submitted to the Weld County Health Department by the 30th of each month for their review. 5. No permanent disposal of :wastes shall be permitted at this sits. 6. Fugitive dust shall be confined to this site. The construction site shall be reseeded in grass by Uune, 1990. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the residential limit of 55 dB(A) , es measured -according to 25-12-102, -Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. Vaulted toilets or en individual sewage disposal system shall be required for the proposed facility and the system shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Teguletions. 9. All pumps, pits, and nil and gas production facilities shall be adequately fenced -with a six foot chain link fence -with three barbed wire strands on top to prevent trespassing. Gates to the enclosures are to be locked at all times except when operators art present. 10. The reservoirs shall be operated in accordance with the conditions of the decree of Water Court Ease No. 85CW443. The reservoirs are subject to administration and water may not be impounded during periods of a • senior tall on the South Platte -River System. During these periods, all inflow, precipitation, etc. must be released and returned to the river without use. € 90743 Lakeview Village USR-881 Page 2 11. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be notified prior to the placement of dredged or fill material into the completed lakes. The conditions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers shall be complied with. 12. All construction on the property shall he in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 13. Prairie dogs and mosquitos shall be kept to a minimum and not become a public nuisance. 14. The property owner or operator shall to responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning 0rd inance. 15. The property owner or operator shall be responsible far complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 16. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services, Longmont Fire 2rotection District, State Engineer Division of Water Resources, State Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, and the Army Corps of Engineers shall be granted access onto the -property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities tarried out on the -property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 17 . The Special Review area shall he limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and -all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall -require the approval of an amendment of -the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 18. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the -foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. U90743 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number USW-881 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearing at Hearing 1 . Application 50 Pages X 2. One application plat(s) 1 page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DP-5 Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing list X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Two DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X 8. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 10. DPS Field £heck X 11 . One page -addendum to application X 12. ,Tune 5, 1989, referral from Weld County Health X Department 13. May 31, 1989, referral from Division of Water X Resources 14. May 30, 1989, field check from Ivan Gosnell, X Planning Commission member 15. May 15, 1989, referral from Longmont Soil X Conservation Servic-e 16. April 5, 1989, referral from U.S. Corps of X Engineers 17. May 15, 1989, referral from Longmont Firs X Protection District 18. May 18, 1989, referral from Oil and Gas X Commission 19. May 18, 1989, s-eferral from County -Engineer X I hereby certify that the 19 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prier to the scheduled -Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on June 22, 1989. (7om ,+ > r. .[.t�%L' Ct9ent Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD j . as SUBSCRIBERQ9VD SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 22 day of �L-wi 19%4y sEAj.� i �G (" \ - (yp1.C9 4i1 OO& \1 r v" 1 NOT Y PUBLIC 830743 my _AJ:^:++issiontxpires F_eb.. 13, 1993 / EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case fj ?-,cJrf EL- S2 '!o2,J41Q_eccI „en42.d elo e ti,C'Adc a2 .1G Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description • A. B. 4/7}Z/y/./.Q,Q/a -"/S4 /-EZe 1t1 f e4rin IZ0ar� C. C Aanara x� . t ll/eAnmmz/J, y1� C//i j tJ GGG'' 2 D. Soe TC/ 96- gc Sate 7-0,4,--orte E. 7140, g l5/52714a11.7 �C1�.�1/1 di70 ti nee/ F. G. - H. I. J. R. L. M. N. 0. 890743 3 DATE: June 20, 1989 CASE NUMBER: USR-881 NAME: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer ADDRESS: 5630 West 71st Circle, Arvada, CO 80003 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) zone -district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEI of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of the Town of Firestone; west of Weld County Road 13 and south of Weld County Road 22 THE :DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR IHE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It 3s the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 2-4.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - This proposal is located within the urban growth boundary area of Firestone and is consistent with the Weld -County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies. Ile Tri-Area Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on June 7, and recommended approval. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district. The proposed use is a recreational ski lake and is provided for as a use by Special review an the Agricultural zone district. - The uses permitted will le compatible with the existing surrounding land uses -and with the future -development -crf the surrounding area as permitted by the IJeld County Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding land uses include agricultural production and rural residences. - No overlay districts effect the site. - Special Review Development Standards will ensure adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood; end County. 990143 Lakeview Village US R.-8 S 1 Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the iepartment of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur tor shall any building or electrical permits by issue on the _property until the Special Review plat is ready tote recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the Special Review permit plat: - a signed copy of the letter from Alan D. Gill-an, Gillan's Engineering, Inc. , included in Appendix E of the application, shall be submitted and shall include the engineer's registration stamp. - the Special Review permit plat shall be amended to show the relocation of the boat dock at least 150 feet from any oil or gas well. 890743 LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. WHO IS LAKEVIEW VILLAGE ? Lakeview Village has Eight members. We range from a single individual to a family with four children. We are all gainfully employed in occupations including accounting, construction, food service, etc. WHAT IS IT THAT WERE DOING ? We're constructing two small lakes which we will use in a specialized type of waterskiing. Slalom course waterskiing is comparable to slalom course snow skiing. WHY ? Slalom course waterskiing requires a more controlled environment than can-typically be found on public lakes. Private ownership will afford us this control. WHERE ARE THE_AKES ? Onan20 cre vacant-property located in unincorporated Weld County. Specifically, the east half of the northeast quarter, Section 23. IS THIS A LEGAL USE OF THE PROPERTY ? Yes,the property is located inanagricultural zone district and is within an urban growth boundary area. Use of property-as a private recreational facility inboth is consistent with current zoning ordinances. WHO WILL BE AFFECTED ? No one will-be adversely affected. Wetave provided for thesafety and welfare of surrounding property owners as well as Weld County in total. HAS ANYONE ELSE EVER DONE SOMET-HING LIKE THIS ? Yes, sever-al similar properties have been constructed in different parts of the country. All have beensuccessful and-beneficial additions to their-neighborhoods. 990743 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET NAME: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer ADDRESS: 5630 West 71st Circle, Arvada, CO 80003 REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) zone Aistrict LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEi of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of Firestone; west of Weld County Road 13 and south of Weld County Road 22 SIZE OF PARCEL: 80 acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM THE APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the Weld County Health Department, Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Longmont Fire Protection District; State of Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; and the Weld County Engineering Department. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any objections from surrounding property owners. 890743 f-ioG .C x. G fr 25 • s1�r " ' L.to 1 :r . I F ��'� rEft. r1 • •I fay i =�Y• F • • i N• • ' I •, •g17 ;, / R �• •- ' .�•(: . _ . ,----- -_Z_ 1 r - . '. -- . --. . „ •-' 4- -: " � ��. i'''ce '�;\ �F l ' • I1 y '�` .�•• ' •• z '. . • x : �[• .1 �; • /' •�•• • I •1 ( •• ,oufro"• g• Gi • • •,kl: ," •t/ r 1 �1: .23 G°ra �i .•.l—__- • ,__ 6 ' ^ ¢_ ��,/�i.• :1 • �I !r1.u°°ex , • C • •N• • 15 om - Ct k aI �qq ... I. -...Jl- . A �. r tl 1 o \C.•s'y�. 1• •C I • x' II • • xz \'.•. xs pp 111�� ( I ( I?1..1\ \, ,' I iar iE r..E'.\ • < 'It P .G rest}I{� / • • 0< °• �fco_:,°. G •V• • • I (\ qq ;'• F Sa�rbnn'� r.--11,.",?, es^cll xs. J . 1 xi •• -:.o. zf � �• z✓ x�--^� lzs •:s 1 .�.� n x'\ N... i I Xn© C4 G r ..p// �"f' v"c .mod .:K . - A i ( � = iil r .1\, • U dGRBOUR 0A/DS '• 34 °• ff of II rcl •• III c� G�- —v- I,. ..Gs._/ o i 1 1 ,l; ,I K' a •/ :I 1 fir., '� li D1 F,- 4 I". t �?/ / •� �• \/=q19 ' ° 4 2 I . I. w''? -+v [WHAM f•�._ 1 - G t k.'�1 , `• f / -pc II' -. 1•..�.-i . • . -„.:t.n + _ 1 •I pl` ° x� 'V C — ..1 A Tr gpUQ • E :: jj / !Pd0�,; „_ . ,, ,a . , ,' I e°'� ,e°1 ` 'tic I• t. .M•.( +. ,, r. 23 • 2. Vii r1 xx ._v • x' •vl o.!'/ t I , , y • • / 4_,,,f_._,,,_. ,,, : D a fns 4, J2>0>fl xf ` 27 •; x• • d \ /� 24.". ¢`i xf• . tcI• •/'7 k. S .• f REOEPC , .-- � `:1. �.;�( ` _ v, ,. w �1 , ."311 „ „ ,° T: /is'e�'F• °. I I• .I I z zr'� J 1 - /. En: • -.. ,r. -. '.n.. .-.,} .e, `. r¢) .�` •�•• 1° • .z; czM D°' L' . E5 // eel: .—�. .d - a� , wra`' .-7:1(4r) / � G• x r •e L` ��) •Ri \ .� • . f.:°.? I _ f r i f e 11�{{I •6 t Ihv�' ll I } �1 1 1 l� 1/4 .' ' .p �l ' _ r2>tt ,� • I j— flL a • J • ,� �=)' /. ` 7..,-' J • • 4 ": \ i I .. C 10 1 .. 4'41\ ti /j / Ji vY :1 1 I x• 4 '►�•• r • o . I • " &V,,,on flr (AVG - - 7. ,/ D°nez . . •� �' �t n� ^�._.. wor rF(w B/E�rG I o.• a 1 ._ x , 27 I k': 1 ��•• �cA� w� "•O x• �1 1 I."� n 'P.I t A ') xr • e ( ,o ' a h zz a •� -- :cf.:, „ (, „E.7 1 , ,• lie' „ 1 '; _ .. _ • �(I;, I fl qq ,x ,. n . I . . N I se • ..�.f'. .. -IL.J / V/.�..i1 C ° N I1 ' L 1 n -/'� U - v ,7r l I i , ( t Tyr " a� eso� i .. _ i; i ".4940 'I - I / / _ _ .==--= i,lr _ aB4 - eB63_ ° 1- o 4650 v�- , - i i N i \ I � , n V �� .� , ' H �• 1 l) �, c'�� ) Iii A vo �� 1'VSi ,-� i J i2 ' � �/ 12 rcrm ' � �7, �� C '- - / ( � A / ' 4900 i J _ ,�_ i! I —ar�ey--- — \ vI Ri n, alle 7 V`. er^ rat, i ( _ 1 �,� ' ange i • 1 aq ,\ `✓ -��.1 l �\ �L. ' '� i \ —=, - -,Y ._�_ i. '-.-�-il a89)'.l�_ _ _ .1x923 14912. r '. _- � — _ h• o / `` '' 'Cl !'f . °.�, rlume /( • �i cr' 4950 �� Cco (:) o� I ' it I '1.J'1 o� r,777. ,�� \_l c I� dam+ I 1 I A, � II / -. . ,1 � ^ .( '1 ill �V A ,i : Lf l)9 I •7° 'I I KT' :MI. '� p 0V I • _- _ o \ .4925'. \ • ° l/ 913 / Ar) l � Ali `\ r /r' / \ I, y U \ �� 1 j// i P Vp O A � III " -,Dail Schott A /1 / �, 2 / ; — -24 -24 9 = `� - lam' 1 _j ..he l l _ y6o I n -- Mme a _ (-N..' __---__ _ \_ [965 494& c o eln� er_ I,/ I t 5003�,�C,0, :4577 � ---- -r rFireeto e I. l I �IT":- soon zs ( ,rol A9 illa FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-881 DATE OF INSPECTION: May 19, 1989 NAME: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) located in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NEI of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of Firestone; west of Weld County Road 13 and south of Weld County Road 22 LAND USE: N Residence E Residence S Farmland 4J Farmland ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural Ir' Agricultural COMMENTS: Constructed on the property are two elongated lakes situated in a northwest to southeast direction. Access to the property is off of Weld County Road 13, a black topped road having a county arterial classification. Buffalo Acres subdivision is to the site's immediate eastern and northern property lines. The construction area is barren of vegetation due to the stripping of topsoil. The lake area is lower in elevation than the surrounding area. A berm has been constructed on the lake's edges which will act as both a sound and site buffer. The property to the west and south is used for agricultural production. By: Cu Sing r ent Plan(n_e 890743 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Lakeview Village, Inc. CASE NUMBER: USR-881 REFERRALS SENT: May 15, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: May 31, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault X Health Department _Brighton Extension Service Dacono _Emergency Management Office Eaton Sheriff's Office Erie X Engineering ✓ _Evans Housing Authority Firestone -- --Airport Authority _Fort Lupton X Building Inspection _Frederick _Garden City STATE Gilcrest X Division of Water Resources / Greeley Geological Survey Grover _Department of Health _Hudson Highway Department _Johnstown _Historical Society _Keenesburg Water Conservation Board _Kersey X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission / La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont __Ault F-1 _Mead Berthoud F-2 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer Dacono F-19 Nunn _Eaton F-4 _Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 X Tri-Area Hudson F-7 -- --Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES La Salle F-9 _Adams X Longmont F-10/ Boulder Milliken F-11 Larimer _Nunn F-12 Pawnee _Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 X US Army Corp of Engineers / Poudre Valley -F-15 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Raymer _Federal Aviation Administration _Southeast Weld F-16 _Federal Communication Commission Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton OTHER _Fort Collins X Central Cola. Water Conservancy Dist. _Greeley _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. X Longmont '/ Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Ivan Gosnell / 890743 xy e S ` � R; r F cv`itart?GS�:�To Weld County Planning Date June 5, 1989 / __ G/ L r`.. o-i COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services �r /� sz /ice_ Subject; Case Number: USR-881 Name: Lakeview Village, Inc. Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. All liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. Water quality in the lake shall be monitored monthly to insure the safety of persons water skiing on the lake. 3. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 4. An ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing any required septic permits on the existing systems. 5. Fugitive dust must be confined on this site. 6. Maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 80db(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statues. 7. Vaulted toilets or an individual sewage disposal system is required for the proposed facility and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. EPS/cs D ,�G'y 7 t\' tl \\ c JUN 91989 Weld to. etatosuissioo 890743 c(51 . .. �� O,p\ is ROY ROMER F V-'" 4 0 Governor v' O JERIS A. DANIELSON * State Engineer /876/ OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 May 31, 1989 Mr. Brian J. Bingle Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Lakeview Village Site Plan, USR-881 NE1/4, Sec. 13, T2N, R68W Dear Mr. Bingle: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to use approximately 24 acre of an existing 80 acre PUD for two reservoirs. We commented upon the PUD in a letter dated January 14, 1986. The proposed reservoirs were decreed in Water Court Case No. 85CW443. As long as the reservoirs are operated in accordance with the conditions of the decree, we have no objections. However, it should be noted that Paragraph 10 of the decree states that the reservoirs are subject to administration and that water may not be impounded during periods of a senior call on the South Platte River System. During these periods, all inflow, precipitation, etc. must be released and returned to the river without use. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Deputy State Engineer HDS/JCM:2791I cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer ti ,v • I r 21989 field CO. %NiwNY wawuS:..w 890743 FIELD CHECK Filing Number: USR-881 Date of Inspection: 221:) - 71;1 Applicant's Name: Lakeview Village, Incorporated, c/o Bob Krammer Request: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) Zone district. Legal Description: Part of the NE} of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately 1/2 mile north of the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22. Land Use: N A C C ("1-u, C ld - ( . vi I h e' 4 fr,.i R • S —CO w fi( a i _ ( - `CI ) — Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) i r1LF�j��y` S A (Agricultural) I) JUN 2 1989 1 W A (Agricultural) -.-- COMMENTS: d,in Li, I;inui SSiuu r r Signature of Board Member 890743 DEPART" 7 N OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)3564000 EXT.4400,.. ‘ t 1 - 915 10th STREET ril 1C• "'T '' GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER USR-881 COLORADO May 15, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Lakeview Village, Incorporated, c/o Bob Kramer for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE$ of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile north of the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22. • This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation ycu consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 30, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please mall Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 1 O f f , We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request a (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our 1 town for the following reasons: N M 1 1 co -------__-jr x We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. G A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: ( /itnt i . ,e, sad.,, Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District _-Tm� Date: May 25, 1989 _ 890743 C April 5, 1989 Platte River Resident Office U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 9307 State Highway 121 Littleton, Colorado 80123-6901 Martin Woodbury 8127 Anchor Drive Longmont, Colorado 80501 • Dear Mr. Woodbury: Reference is made to my April 4, 1989 site visit which concerns the ongoing construction of the Lake View Village project which has required the filling of approximately 0.95 acres of wetland drainage for the construction of lake berms and a water diversion structure located in the NE ': of Section 13, T-2-;1, R-67-W, Weld County, Colorado. Based on the information you provided, this office has determined that the proposed work is authorized by the Department of the Army Nationwide Permit found at 33 CFR Part 330.5(a) (26). Enclosed is a fact sheet which fully describes this Nationwide Permit and lists the Special Conditions which must be adhered to for this authorization to remain valid. Although an Individual Department of the Army permit will not he required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that you obtain any other applicable Federal, State, or local permits as required. Please note that deviations from the original plans and specifications of your project could require additional authorization from this office. Should you at any time become aware that either an endangered species or its critical habitat exist within your project area, you ntust immediately notify this office. You are advised that this verification of the nationwide permit authorization ,/ is valid until April 5, 1991. I must inform you that since your lake construction has included a portion of existing wetlands which is considred to be waters of the United States, your completed lake will be under the Corps of Engineers jurisdication pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, the Corps of Engineers should be notified prior to the placement of dredged or fill material into the completed lakes. 896743 Martin Woodbury Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or call Terry McKee at 303/979-4120 or 4121 and reference Nationwide Permit application number CO-89-39. Sincerely, Terry McKee Environmental Resource Specialist cfs Permit Files Omaha Permits Branch Colorado Dept. of health U.S. Fish and Wildlife Environmental Protection Agency Colorado Division of Wildlife • 890743 -DEPARTMrNT OF PLANNING SERVICES J PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET 41,1414 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 • y "' -. . • CASE NUMBER USR-881 COLORADO o ;�n,>>;�r;j�y � May 15, 1989 I\) ('i1AY 2 4 1989 ! TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 1fr u C . !tiaa,:,; dcr'u. Enclosed is an application from Lakeview Village, Incorporated, c/o Bob Kramer for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the NE$ of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 1/2 mile north of the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by May 30, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, ±ut we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. GN%'L- APp4rc9r,o,✓ , ,c ,o r'u n r e sLen,,r &s> 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. yll LONG�r'OPIT FIRE P.9OT£CT'Oa' O;S i r'`CT Signed: a,fr1 �(�� f� -En7Ee5.'AO Agency: Q;tominuv, t,rc ,:'1n A.cT. c c ;6c-Gn[E arA2'sa a�- LONGMONT, COLORADO 80.`01 Date: -r-J3-:1'9 303-112-0770 890743 STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUITE 380 LOGAN TOWER BUILDING WILLIAM R. SMITH 1580 LOGAN STREET Director DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DENNIS R. BICKNELL ROY ROMER Deputy Director (303) 894-2100 Governor 18 May 1989 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attn: Brian Bingle Re: Case Number USR-881, Lakeview Village Dear Mr . Bingle: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed plan for the Lakeview Village development. Our records indicate that several producing oil and gas wells exist in the vicinity of the project. Two wells lie within the boundaries of the development. The applicants have indicated that they are aware of the existence of these wells, as they are indicated on the plats submitted with the proposal. Safety regulations of the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission that would apply if the development existed before the wells were drilled are: 602 a. Well shall be located a distance of 150 feet or one and one-half times the height of the derrick, whichever is greater , from any occupied building, public road, above ground utility or railroad. C602 a (3) . Tanks shall be a minimum of 200 feet from residences, normally occupied buildings, or well defined normally occupied outside areas. 604 c (1) . All wells located within 150 feet of a residence (s) , or normally occupied outside area (s) , shall be equipped with a fail-safe automatic control valve that will shut the well in when a sudden change of pressure occurs . 604 c (3) . All pumps, pits, and producing facilities shall be adequately fenced to prevent access by unauthorized persons when the producing site or equipment is easily accesible to the public and poses a physical or health hazard. (Note: Although we have not specifically set fencing requirements, in a situation such as this , we would recommend a six (6) foot chain link fence with three barb wire strands on top with adequate gates to all-ow safe operation by workers. Gates are to be locked at all times unless authorized work is being performed on the well. ) 890743 Since the production facilities and wells preceded the development, costs for providing adequate security measures should be worked out between the developers and the well owners. The oil an gas operators would be held responsible for maintenance of the fencing. The location of the boat dock proposed for the north side of the north lake may need to be reconsidered, as it is within the 150 foot limit referred to in 602 a. We recommend that you inform the developers of the provisions contained in our rules and regulations, and include, in your approval, some similar requirements. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding our regulations. Yours truly, John R. Stowell, P.E. Chief, Drilling Operations JRS/js cc: Martin Oil Independent Gas Associates Y M 2 Si 2 1989 A fittli ch. 41niuWr L010;Iii"uI 890743 J 0 rnE ; prIpu; 1131 Brian Bingle, PlanningMay18, 191 i To Date T O /` per Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From Lakeview Village, Inc. , USR-881 Subject: I have no objection to the materials submitted. Appendix E of the materials submitted is a letter by Alan D. Gillan of Gillans Engineering, Inc. I agree with the statements contained in Mr. Gillan's letter regarding storm water run-off. However, the letter is unsigned. A signed letter including the engineer's registration stamp, should be provided. � u rja;!Bri 1 , /��lLl aY 1 9 1989 Yield cu. ?lamui;g vummIss:uil DLS/mw:prlv xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Lakeview Village, Inc. , USR-881 890743 TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: USR-881 APPLICANT: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer REQUEST: Site specific development and a special review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural zone district LEGAL: Part of the NEi of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles north of the Town of Firestone; west of Weld County Road 13 and south of Weld County Road 22 For more information call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 890 743 LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INCORPORATED BOB KRAMER SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS SURROUNDING MINERAL OWNER S Howard J. and Marie C. Wargo 5532 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Raymond L. Newton Susan D. Lorence 5662 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Michael E. & Sandra S. Halleck 5704 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Curtis and Iris Vogt 5818 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Jerry A. Nelson Box 116 Frederick, CO 80530 Kenneth T. and Sandra K. Brooker 9943 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CO 80501 Gerald W. Moore 9815 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CO 80501 John T. and Betty Louise Veno 9783 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CO 80501 Stephan T. and Michelle A. Jeffres 9703 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CC 80501 William E. and Mary J. Kinney 9661 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CO 80501 Minnette Paul 9501 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, CO 80501 890743 Page 2 George E. Johnson Elda Mae Johnson Clarence E. Niven, Trustee Niven Family Trust 1318 Longspeak Longmont, CO 80501 Stanely Olson 4306 Weld County Road 22 Longmont, CO 80501 Meredith O. Johnson c/o John Haley 14491 Weld County Road 5 Longmont, CO 80501 Cole and Mildred E. Kugel 420 Longview Court Longmont, CO 80501 Rosa E. Davis P.O. Box 63 Frederick, CO 80530 Katerine M. and Robert J. Dvorak 6363 Weld County Road 20 Longmont, CO 80501 Robert S. and Donna C. Alexander 6077 Weld County Road 20 Longmont, CO 80501 Lakeview Village, Inc. .n ', 5630 West 71st Circle Arvada, CO 80003 Hearst and Nancy Pressly 6075 Weld County Road 20 Longmont, CO 80501 Lauren Hamilton 5111 Weld County Road 20 Longmont, CO 80501 . 890743 1 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case #USR-881 for Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 15th day of May, 1989. TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first flocr, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: USR-881 APPLICANT: Lakeview Village, Inc. , c/o Bob Kramer REQUEST: Site specific development plan and a special review permit for a recreational facility (private ski lake) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL: Part of the NE of Section 13, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile north cf the Town of Firestone, west of Weld County Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22. For more information call Brian J. Lingle, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT CF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street — Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000 , Ext. 4400 830743 C Avingd6x LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NAMES OF MINERAL OWNERS AND LESSEESOF MINERALS ON OR UNDER THE PROPERTY Lakeview Village, Inc. 5630 W. 71st. Circle Arvada, CO 80003 890743 ( STATE CF CiOLORAD C ) s s. COUNTY OF WELD ) 1,� Det id B. Rey'no1ds, U2_'' r.c duly sworn, says that he is publisher of the News iJF_Ws, a weekly newspaper published in KRRno_burg in said County and State; that said newspaper h;:i s a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ncirculation 7 + �he Weld County Planning g r. rat in said County heommssinTuewiill Hold a public il arts has been contiin t_tS.E'y' and at 1:30Y June 20, 1989 considering for the purpose °� uninterruptedly published therein ,, Development Plan and a Specific Review Special during period # - , least described permit for the rof the I request may Approval of the fifty—two consecutive weeks prior • c E Y create a vested 2 petty right pursuant to i`�' publication a t i on o` the annexed e> e d APPLICANT Lakeview Village, i Incorpoltd first '�? t ^ r ii Cl t 2.c e y' that said newspaper = a LEGAL�DEESCRIPTION: Part of i the NEI/4 of Section 13, T2N nf_ws;-.a er within F._ ,e meaning of thed CR68W of the 6th P.M.,Wel t. of the General e r a x Assembly o f the TYPE AND d at.. INTENSITY i. !. C a• .wColorado, entitled „;, PROPOSED USE: Recreational, a t of An Act facility (private ski lake) located + r { in the A (Agricultural) Zone to rart l a r1 t o , e r r i i i C g o, 1. g l district LOCATION: Approximately .5 notice and advertisements, " and miles north of the Town of rr i t N r Firestone, west of Weld Count :=m l .jm thereto; thit. the notice Road 13, and south of Weld County Road 22, o which the annexed i a printed SIZE: eo acres,more or iesc i The pubic hearing will be held in cot"y' taken trom aid newSnaper, YJas. the Weld County Commissioner'sylisiHearingroom. h'uatFloor, WedJub... �,ied 1n said nE=wSspape , and if? CountyCentennialCenter, 91 and entire' issue , r Co n�mentseoc oti)ections relaoteddto the regular r: ,_ir'= o , the above request should be +'der�j' number thereof , once a week subnutted in wnecti to the Weld County Deptment of Planning for weekthat said notice was SC, Services, 915:Tenth Street, Room 342, Greel Colorado 80631 published in said n e w s(_:r e proper before the above date or presented at the public hearin on June 28, and not in any supplement `hereof ., 1 - g 1 ; y ' ataileblE for�pu1401cpinspectiondc�i h ;And that t�3 r? first G!!iJ._ —��_i��.i t7, said notice aforesaid , Seri ices,�itoome 32,oWeld lCount ��id net•»r.CG-'' e� ci i Gi`",...:ad3,'1. t was on Centennual Cenr, 915 Tent Street, Greelev, olorado 80631 - Stre e-3561080, xtension 8000.18t.h day of May. 1 89 Bud Ha lldorson, ChairmanWeldCounty Planning ConmiissionTo be published in the New Newsth,. Tobepublishedne(1) time b cl ii 11 the�c last on the May 18, 1989 Y Received by: Date: Published in The Neil News 18th -ay of M ':, 19 7 . May 18, 1989. ll' ( 7 .._____Y_ Subscribed and sworn to afore me this /( day of May, 1W29, .. N,- ary F'....'.bii Y.../ commi sion expir_'Y 12'-90 � ---..,-77,77 ir ..0i \., , ,J.._ 1 , IIi Jt m , UN 51989 and 1. M q CIitt•)•' , 41- T1 • 43 n‘- Th T', Cam, L 71/47 S A r l\ra L ,I Li 0 890743 LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION WELD COUNTY, COLORADO `P U' it 890743 To: The Weld County Office of Planning Services, and all others concerned. Prepared by Bob Kramer of Lakeview Village, Inc. Dear Sirs, We are pleased to make application for Use by Special Review in Weld County Colorado. We feel that through this application, we've an excellent opportunity to "tell the world" what were doing. The information included in this booklet is divided into sections that correspond to the sections of the Use by Special Review Permit Application. Each question references the appropriate Weld County Zoning Ordinance paragraph number(s). If anyone has any questions that aren't answered in the following pages, or would like to have a tour guide for a visit to our site, please feel free to call. r Sincerely, Bob Kramer Home: 429-0840 Office: 444-5710 880 743 T-ABLE OF CONTENTS in-order of the USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDE Section 1 Application form & Continuation of application form pg. 1 Section 2 Detailed description of the proposed operation and use pg. 2 thru 10 Section 3 Written materials pg. 10 thru 19 Section 4 Use by special review permit plan maps Appendix L Section 5 N/A Section 6 Weld County zoning ordinance section 24.5 pg. 19 compliance demonstration Section 7 Weld County zoning ordinance section 24.6 pg. 22 compliance demonstration Appendix A Slalom course diagram Appendix B Lakeview Village, Inc. ski club rules Appendix C Findings and rulings of the referee and decree of the water court Appendix D Lower Boulder Ditch Company shares certificate Appendix E Engineer's report Appendix F United States Department of the Interior letter Appendix G Property value letter Appendix H Warranty deed and legal property description Appendix I Soil test report Appendix J Certified list of owners of property within 500 feet Appendix K Certified list of owners and lessees of minerals on or under the property Appendix L Site and Plot Plan Maps • Appendix M Testimonial Letters 890743 �' USE-BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado-80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext.-4400 Case Number Dat-a Received Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted Application Fee Receipt Number Recording Fee Receipt Number TO _BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County -Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: t/.t.t NE/4 Section 13 T A N, R 0E W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: O01 NE/4 Section 13 T a N, R 49 W Property Address (if available) Vacan} Land PRESENT ZONE OVERLAY ZONES TOTAL ACREAGE 80 PROPOSED LAND USE Prwe}e R.ecraak-fon EXISTING LAND USE -Open S?oc.t SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: t-cAttvie.o Vflln3e, inc. Kromer) Address: SSs30 14, Ole.Civde City AvacAoo Zip SCOD Home Telephone / 4d4-OR4n Business -Telephone 0 444.57I0 Name: -Address: City Zip -Home Telephone / Business Telephone 4 -APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above): Name: WI Kramrr Address: SL,3(1 ``.1 91s4 cirr\. City Avu dLAn Zip $zsj Home Telephone i 4R4-0440 Business Telephone / 444.5710 List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: Le&te-vie,a Vi(lope L@@c Address: %(nit, 1s\ 91,E C`f..eie City AramAn Zip 4CSc3 Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) "�(u,�/!II `Y'/�u1,,�` gf'grne e: \ Owner Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2717,9,- 199:1. p /I/ oC FTi,{A y NOTAR PUBLIC My commission expires 1/- /5- 9 890743 LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW-AVPLICATION SECTION 1 (24.7:2) CONTINUATION OF APPLICATION-FORM EXISTING LAND USE. (24.7.2.5) The land is an irregularly shaped, 80 acre vacant parcel currently zoned for agricultural-use, that includes a 40ft. wide by 1023ft. long strip that is zoned-residential. It houses two natural as wells and a natural gas storage tank. The land has not been actively farmed or used for 35yrs. (since 1954). Two-reservoirs are currently in the process of being constructed on_approximately 24 of the 80 acres (approximately 30% of the-property). These reservoirs are being constructed to provide an irrigation water source for parts of the remaining 56 acres, lakes for raising fish, and a slalom course waterskiing training site -the reason for this permit application. SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF-AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT continued: (24.7.2.1) (2-4.7.2.2) Lakeview Visage Inc. Shareholders (property owners): -Steve & Georgiana Anderson Brad& Patty-Anderson 1127 Merriman PI. 10453 W. 75th.-Ave. Longmont, CO 80501 Arvada, CO 80005 77$.0844 (H) 424-7205 (H) 449-7172 (W) John & Linda Geels Bob& Rhonda Kramer 6368B. Race Ct. 5630 W. 71st. Cir. Littleton, CO 80121 Arvada, CO-80003 798-8095 (H & W) 429.0840 (H) 444-5710 (W) George & Doris Pavlick Tom & Carol Rutt 10442 Sante Fe St. 61-9 Alkire St. • Northglenn, CO 80234 Golden, CO 80401 $90743 1 452-5355 (H) 238-5483 (H) 688-0868 (W) 936-2341 (W) Jeff Temple Marlin &Jane Woodbury Nederland Star Route 8127 Anchor Dr. Boulder, CD 80302 Longmont, CO 80501 444-4505 (H) 651-3730 (H) 449-0611 (W) 452-4740 (W) SECTION 2 (24/.3) EXPLAIN PROPOSED USE. (24.73) (24.7.3.1) Weipropose to use the surface recreational rights of the lakes forslalom-course waterskiing. Slalom course waterskiing represents less than one percent of all waterskiing. It is low keyed, veryxontrolled, and is much-moreasport than a recreation. It requires special equipment, from the type of teats used to the lakes skied on,along with-considerable commitment from it's-participants, both financialand in time. Thissport is not at-all well known and is often confused with general recreational waterskiing. Total participation in this sport numbers less than 20,000 in the whole of the USA. Participation in the whole Denver metropolitan area-numbers less than 300. On theother hand, it's estimated that there are over 12 million recreational waterskiers. With these numbers, it's-not hard to_understand why most people associate all waterskiing with situations like Cherry Creak Reservoir, with all it's noise, confusion, congestion, and alchohol. Slalom course waterskiing differs significantly from this form of recreation. As such, the typic-al recreational skier would mot be interested in this development,-nor would-he be welcome. Appendix A shows how in thissport, the boat follows a straight path through-sets of guide bouys allowing the skier to ski around sixskier bouys in-a fashion similar to which a snow skier would ski around the gates in a downhillslalom course. Since it's inception in the early 1950's,this course has provided-challenges to all who have tried it as well-as a basis for world class competition. Unlike any other competative sport, individual family members can ski, train and compete together regardlessof their personal-skill level. EXPLAIN NEED FOR USE. (2473.15) Throughout the history of slalom course waterskiing,a key element to a skier's success has been the availability of an acceptable site at which to train and practice. At a minimum, a_calm, 2 890743 sheltered area with protection from prevailing winds and other boats is required. Initially, most skiers only had access to public waterways which were marginal at best. As time went on, more and more people began using public waterways for boating and recreational skiing. This pressure squeezed the slalom course skier out of the few areas compatible for training and onto private lakes which can be controlled and regulated, and are generally considered too small for recreational waterskiing. There are currently only six lakes in the Denver metropolitan area being used for slalom course waterskiing. "Membership" at each of these lakes is typically limited to a small number of families to insure as high a quality site conditions as are feasible. Although the sport's following remains small in relation to most others, the supply of lakes has not kept pace with their demand. None of these lakes were specifically designed for this purpose either, so they too, provide a mediocre site for proper training requirements. Each of these lakes is being leased by an individual who sells memberships on a year to year basis with no guarantee of continued availability. Members are as such, subject to the whims of these leaseholders as well as the lake owners. Given the level of investment in equipment that one must make to participate in this sport, (approx. $20,000), this puts the skier at considerable financial exposure. Annual memberships are also only available at considerable individual expense, ranging from $1250 to$3000. This situation is typical across the country and has been the impetus for man-made training sites. Through specialized design, a man-made lake can offer ideal conditions that are very rarely found in any natural body of water while providing it's owners with a much more financially acceptable situation. These "ideal"sites provide: A) Strictly controlled and limited access to the lakes, to enhance safety and to control wake -disturbance. Boat wakes that are allowed to rebound from the shore and enter the course tan be uncomfortable if not dangerous for the skier. First, no more than one boat can be in use on the lake at a time. Second, only boat types approved by the American Water Ski Association for safe operation and low noise output are accepted. And third, no alchoholic beverages are allowed on site. Appendix B is a listing of some of the rules and regulations that will govern our waterskiing operations. It) Lakes designed or groomed to limit boat wakes. Shorelines with a very gentle slope (approximately 10 to 1), help to absorb and eliminate quickly, any wakes created by a passing boat. C) Lakes positioned to minimize disturbance from the wind. As with boat wakes, wind generated waves are undesirable. The first man-made lake of this type was built in the late 1960's and is located in near Barstow, California. With it's proven success, many man-made lakes have been constructed throughout the country since then. They have been located in both rural and urban settings, many of which are in the midst of residential developments, and are often combined with other urban type hobby uses 3 890743 such as raising horses and even private airplane flying. One such three lake facility which is in a suburb of Sacramento, California, is adjacent to a high -density single family residential neighborhood, a private airstrip, as well as open land. The track record has shown that a site of this nature is a compatible neighbor to any type of land use. EXPLAIN THE TYPES OF EXISTING USES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. (24.7.3.2) A) Immediate Neighbors: Approximately 60% of the property is bounded by active farm properties zoned A-1. Approximately 40% is bounded by unincorporated urban residential properties. Many of these property's owners maintain their lots to support equestrian hobbies. This area is-zoned R-1. The remainder, approximately 5%, is bounded by County-Road 13 and a railroad track. B) Outlying properties: Outlying properties are a combination of active farm properties, open space, and unincorporated urban properties. THE DISTANCE OF THE PROPOSED USE TO RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES IN EACH DIRECTION. There are currently eleven neighboring residential structures within 1500 feet of the proposed use. The distance from the closest boat path on either lake to each of these residences is, 1) 900 feet, (site Plan reference #002),2) 1000 feet, (#003), 3) 1400 feet, (#004), 4) 1500 feet, (#005), 5) 1500 feet, (#013), 6) 1300 feet, (#009), 7) 1000 feet, (#010), 8) 750 feet, (#011), 9) 350 feet, (#002), 10) 1400 feet, (#029), 11) 1100 feet, (#004). The next closest residential structure is over 1750 feet, (1/3 mile), away. See site plan in Section 4. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF USERS, PATRONS, MEMBERS, AND BUYERS. (24.7.3.4) Users: will consist of the property's owners, and at times, their guests. There are currently eight Lakeview Village, Inc. shareholders (owners). Generally, users try to stagger their time at the lakes to maximize their private use of the site Use will mainly occur during summer weekends, -holidays, and vacations. Patrons:the properly will only be used privately, not for hire to customers. Members: only owners are considered members, see Users above. Buyers:only owners are considered buyers, see Users above. 4 890743 THE NUMBER OF-EMPLOYEES, NUMBER OF SHIFTS, AND HOURS OF OPERATION. (24.7.3.3) As a private operation, there willte no employees or shifts. Hours of operation will be limited to daylight hours. THE TYPEDF WATERSOURCE FOR THE OPERATION. (24.5.1.1) There-are no central water requirements for the-proposed use. The lakes will be filled, kept at appropriate levels, and augmentation requirements provided for bysurface water from two unnamed tributaries to St. Vrain Creek, saidaurface wateroriginating from seepage, waste, drainage, and tailwater associated with-natural precipitation, irrigation operations, and water-storage operations in areas surrounding the reservoirs; and surface water from unnamed springs originating on the property. Sixsharesmf Lower Boulder Ditch Company will be used for irrigation. See Appendicies C& D. (Findings and-ruling of the refereeand-decree of the water court, District Court, Water-Division 1, CO.; Lower Boulder Ditch Co. sharexertificate copy). EXPLAIN THE ACCESS ROUTE(S)fORTHE PROPOSED OPERATION. Entry to the property isprovided -at one point from Weld-County Road 13. Impact to this road during high volume traffic periods will be all but non-existent due to the nature of this special use. Summer weekends, holidays,and vacations will be the-host likely times the site will be accessed for this use. TheToads on the propertyare made of dirt. EXPLAIN TYPE, SIZE, WEIGHT, AND FREQUENCY OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (2473E8) Type: A) Personal vehicles of the_users described above. B) Boats belonging to the property owners. These boats all are of the type approved for this use by the American Water Ski-Association. Tote "approved", these toots had to pass multiple tests-of their design andsafety characteristics. Engineers and scientists from the 5 890743 United-States Olympic Committee and AWSA were responsible for the creation of these tests. This type of boat is specifically designed for this use and will be the only type allowed on the lakes. They have several design features that serve to limit their noise output, including an exhaust system that is designed specifically to minimize noise. First,they use the same engines that are found in many passenger cars, not race cars. As with passenger car engines, they are built with long term reliability in mind, not speed. High -speeds aren't required of these boats as slalom course waterskiing speeds never exceed 26mph. Second, the engines are encased by covers that are thickly padded with sound deadening accoustic foam insulation. Third, the engine is located in the center of the boat, surrounded by the boat's hull, the interior of which is covered by a heavy gauge marine grade of carpeting. Fourth, as stated, the exhaust system is designed specifically to minimize noise. At the beginning of the system, water is injected into the engines' exhaust manifolds. The exhaust then flows through two mufflers which are contained beneath the boat's floor-boards. Finally, the exhaust flows out the boat's transom (rear), at water level, through valves that direct it downward. The overall design results in noise output levels that are actually lower than those of average vehicular traffic at similar distances. No visitors boats will be used at this site. C) Motor homes and / or camping trailers belonging to the users and patrons. Six of the _owners have motor homes which they may occasionally bring to the site for overnight use. Size: A) -Ranging from for example, a Honda Accord to a full size pickup. B) -Approximately 19 feet in length. C) Ranging from 15 to 24 feet in length. Weight: -A) Ranging from-2000 to 4000 pounds. B) Approximately 2900 pounds. C) Ranging from 2000 to 10,000 pounds. Frequency: A) An average of twice-per week during the summer months. B) An average of twice per year. C) -An average of twice per year. THE TYPE OF SEWAGE FACILITIES FOR THE PROPOSED USE. (24.7.3.9) (24.5.1.2) Vaulted toilets will be constructed per the recommendations of the Weld County Department of Heath. ] 0743 6 A DESCRIPTION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (24.5.1.4) All of the owner's boats are equipped with Coast Guard approved fire extinguishers. If additional fire protection services are ever required, they will be provided by: Longmont Fire ProtectionDistrict 9119 County Line Road Longmont, CO 80501 772-0710 They estimate their response time to the site at seven minutes. THE TYPES AND MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ANIMALS TO BE CONSENTRATED ON THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW AREA-AT ANY ONE TIME. (24.7.3.5) Four of the owners have pet dogs-of small to medium size that may occasionally frequent the site. T+IE TYPE AND SIZE OF-ANY WASTE, STOCKPILE, OR STORAGE AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (24.7.3.10) No waste , stockpile or storage area willbe associated with the use. TYPE OF STORM WATER RETENTION FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (24.5.1.5) (24.5.1.5.1) (24.5.1.5.2) The Special Use that we are applying for will not significantly change the land from it's-historical use -the land will remain open space only some of it will now be in the form of reservoirs. The reservoirs were designed, engineered and approved in accordance with requirements set forth by the Office of the-State-Engineer - Division of Water Resources. Their use will enhance the storm water retention capabilities of the property and have no effect on the level of ground water in. the surrounding area. An engineer's report issubmitted as Appendix E. The dikes used to construct the reservoirs are classified by the Office of the State Engineer - Division of Water Resources as Non - Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structures. It should be 890743 7 noted however, that several ztesign features were incorporated in the constructional these lakes that are in excess of the design standards required for this type of structure. All of these were deemed advisable by our group, and two of them (extra freeboard and rerouting of existing dr-ainageways) were recommended by the State Engineers office to insure the continued safe operation of the lakes given our special use intentions. The special design features include: interior shoreline slopes_of 10 to 1 run the length of the lakes which will eliminate shoreline erosion; increased freeboard-as recommended by the Colorado Divisional Dam Safety;a concrete spillway; compaction levels of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM 69878; and-have ensured a controlled release of storm water from the lakes by installing six inch-drop-outlets which aperate-automatically if the water reaches a certain level. We have also rerouted and_upgraded existing drainageways to eliminate-potential-erosion of the dikesand increase the drainageway's loadaarrying capacity; No paved roads or parking lots will be constructed on the property. -Part of the dirt roads that had existed on the property have been removed as a result of the construction of the lakes, what remains will be used for access. The minimal parking requirements will be accomodated on unimproved areas of the property. 1-HE TIME SCHEDULE AND METHOD OF REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS, JUNK, AND OTHER WASTES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (24.7.3.11) No debris, junk, or-wastes will be associated with the proposed_use. Trash collection and removal will be provided for by a local trash collection company. EXPLAIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PLANS-AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE. (24.7.3.13) Landscaping plans associated with the proposed use-are limited to the planting of trees along the edges of the lakes. -These will serveas both sound and wind barriers. Erosion control measures will include: revegitation of lake construction areas with native species; the planting of alphalfa and /_or trees on approximately 10 acres of the property; the planting of trees along theedges of the lakes; interiorshoreline-slopes of 10 to 1 that run the length of the lakes, the slope-at which wave action naturally forces the distribution of dirt or sand; increased freeboard to allow for wave action; rerouting and _upgrading of existing drainageways to eliminate potential erosion of the dikes and increase the drainageways load carrying capacity; a spillway constructed-of concrete; compaction levels of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM-698-78; and ss0743 8 have ensured a controlled release of storm water from the lakes by installing six inch drop outlets which_operate automatically if the water reaches a certain level. No paved roads or parking lots will be constructed on the property. -Part of the dirt roads that had existed on the property have been removed as a result of the construction of the lakes, what remains will be used for access. The minimal parking requirements will be accomodated on unimproved areasiof the property. (24.3.1.5.1) (24.5.1.5.1) RECLAMATION PROCEDURES TO BE EMPLOYED UPON -CESSATION OF THE JJSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW ACTIVITY. (241.3.13) Cessation of the activity is not expected,-however if theekiing activity were to cease, the lakes would still be used in their agricultural c-apacity. A TIME TABLE SHOWING THE PERIODS OF TIME REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION -AND START-UP-OF THE PROPOSED USE. (24.7.3.12) Startwp will occur upon completion of the construction of the reservoirs and theepprovalvf this application. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUESTED IN SECTION 24.7 OF THE "WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE" BUT IS NOT INDIVIDUALLY REQUESTED IN THE SPECIAL USE APPLICATION. TYPES AND NUMBERS OF OPERATING AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT TO BE UTILIZED. (24.7.3.6) Operating equipment will _consist _of the owner's boats described above. No processing equipment willteiitilized. TYPE, NUMBER,-AND USESOFTHE PROPOSEDST-RUCTURES TOBE ERECTED. (24.7.3.7) The vaulted toilets-mentioned above and two boat docks will be erected. 890743 9 LOCATION OF ANY FLOOD HAZARD, GOELOGICAL HAZARD, OR MINERAL RESOURCE AREAS. (24.7.4.5.3.12) No flood or geological hazards-exist on the property. Mineral resource areas are limited to natural gas wells. Their locations are detailed on the plot plan map in Section 4. SECTION 3 (24.7.1) A STATEMENT EXPLAINING HOW THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (24.7.1.1) The land, when purchased by Lakeview Village, Inc., had no existing use. It's last active use was over thirty five years ago. It would therefore require extensive -effort to bring it back to a productive state. It's suitability for agricultural productivity is also dependent on irrigation-according to the Soil Survey of Weld County provided by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. (This was bo me out in the soil testsperforme-dat the-site, see Appendix l). Our irrigation -authorization will allow us to water the eastern most section mf the property. This section has been -earmarked for our farming of trees-and alphalfa. We will not bring about any decrease in the land area of farmland. Although not-a part of our special use, with our-planned planting of crops and creation of-two reservoirs, our operation will actually return as much as 42.5% of the land to a -semi-active, agriculturally productive state. Ourproposed private recreational use is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural and R-1 (low-density residential)ione districts in which it will be loc-ated. Use as a-private recreational facility is provided for in both zone districts as a Use by Special Review. The Soil Survey mentioned previously-states too, that the soil types found on the property "have good potential for urban and recreational development". This was also bourne_out in the soil tests performed at the-site. See Appendix I Our proposed private recreational use is an acceptable-use in an urban growthtoundary area and is adjacent to an existing municipality. The property is bounded -on two sides by urban properties and is within the Firestone urbanzgrowth boundary area and thus does not disperse this type of land use. No-extension-of services through vacantareas will be required and there willbe no competition or conflict between this land.use and rural land use interests. With the property remaining-open spac-e, accessand use of the whole property restricted,and the significant increase in theasthetic value of the property, it will become an area of quiet seclusion 890743 10 addressing the needs of our families while maintaining the rural -character of the surrounding unincorporated community settlements. A STATEMENT EXPLAINING HOW THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE USE IS LOCATED. (24.7.1.2) "The agricultural zone district is intended to preserve prime agricultural land and to provide areas for agricultural activities and uses dependent upon agriculture without the interference of incompatible residential, commercial, and industrial uses." The land, when purchased by Lakeview Village, Inc., had no existing use. It's last active use was over thirty five years ago. It would therefore require extensive effort to bring it back to a productive state. Its suitability for agricultural productivity is also dependent= irrigation according to the Soil Survey of Weld County provided by the United_States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. (This wasto me out in the soil tests performed at the site,see Appendix l). Our irrigation authorization will allow us to water the eastern most section of the property. This section has been earmarked for our farming of trees and alphalfa. We will not bring about any decrease in the land area of farmland. Although not-a.part of our special use, with our planned planting of crops and creation of two reservoirs, our operation will actually return as much as 42.5% of the land to a semi-active, agriculturally productive state. The Special Use that we-are applying for will not change the land from it's-historical use - the land will remain openspace only somemf it will now be in the form of reservoirs. Our{xoposed private recreational use is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural and R-1 (low density residential) zone districts in which it will be located. Use as a private recreational facility is provided for in both zone districts as a Use by Special Review. The Soil Survey mentioned previously states too, that the soil types found on the property "have good potential for urban and recreational development". This was-also bo me out in the soil tests performed at the site. See Appendix I At a laterxfate, we may apply for a PUD permit on this land. If and when this conversion is applied for andapproved, it wouldte within the agriculturalpolicies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the land is located inan urban growth boundary area. It wouldalsot>e within the agricultural goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the land is located in an area which is-adjacent to an existing incorporated municipality and would permit low density residential development on non-prime agricultural land. Further, it is bounded= two sides by unincorporated urban properties and thus doesmotidisperse this typetf land use. No extension of services through vacant areas would be required and there would be no competion orxonflict between this land use and rural Iand.use interests. 890743 ll If and when this conversion is applied for and approved, it would also be within the Unincorporated Community and Planned Unit Development goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the development would maintain the rural character of these settlements, would benefit Weld citizens with improved aesthetics and a significant provision for open space, and would also be a creative approach to land development which would result in an environment of distinctive identity and character. A STATEMENT EXPLAINING WHAT EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE, IN THE LOCATION DECISION FOR THE PROPOSED USE, TO CONSERVE PRODUCTIVE AGRICULTURAL LAND IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT IF APPLICABLE. (24.7.1.6) The owners of Lakeview Village, as long-ago as 1984, began a-search for land that would be suitable for their Special Use. This specific property was first identified as a candidate in May of 1984. Over time, various members of our group met with several individuals to determine it's suitability. Some of these meetings were with representatives of the Weld County Department of Planning Services (November 14, 1985), the Colorado State Division of Water Resources (December 28, 1986), the Colorado District Court, Water Division 1 (July 30, 1986), the Firestone Town Council (October 10, 1985), The United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (December 28, 1986), various consultants andmutside engineers (August 18, 1985), as well as the then,-property owners of Buffalo Village and other immediate neighbors (October 10, 1985, September 16, 1985). Through these first and subsequent meetings, it was deemed that this-property was in fact ideal in most all-aspects, not just in conserving productive-agricultural land. A STATEMENT EXPLAINING THERE IS ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND T-HE COUNTY. (24.7.1.7) First, the reservoirs were designed, engineered and approved in accordance with requirements set forth by the Office of the State Engineer - Division of Water Resources. Their use will enhance the storm water retention capabilities of the property and have no effect on the level of ground water in the surrounding area. See attached engineer% report (Appendix ). The dikes used to construct the reservoirs are classified by the Office of the State Engineer - Division of Water Resources as Non - Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structures. It should be noted however, that several design features were incorporated in the construction of these lakes that are in excess of the design standards required for this type of structure. All of these were deemed 12 890743 advisable by our group, and two of them (extra freeboard and rerouting of existing drainageways) were recommended by the State Engineer's office, to insure the continued safety of the lakes. The special design features include: interior shoreline slopes of 10 to 1 run the length of the lakes, the slope at which wave action naturally forces the distribution of dirt or sand, which will eliminate shoreline erosion; increased freeboard to allow for wave action; rerouting and upgrading of existing drainageways to eliminate potential erosion of the dikes and increase the drainageways load carrying capacity;a concrete spillway to eliminate potential for erosion; compaction levels of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM 698-78; and have ensured controlled release of storm water from the lakes by installing six inch drop outlets whichoperate automatically if the water reaches a certain level. Second, our use will help control the prairie dog population of thearea. Known to be-carriers of desease and creators of burrow holes dangerous to humans and animals,their removal will enhance the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and county. See Appendix F. Third, by significantly improving the aesthetic value of this land,the welfare of the neighborhood and county will be likewise improved through increased property values and tax base. See Appendix G. Fourth, by having an active use_on the property, it and it's neighboring properties will be less subject to unauthorized useand vandalism. Fifth, the property is bounded on all sides by fencing, has a lock on it's only gate-entrance, has been posted for No Trespassing, and covered by one million dollar liability insurance. In the event someone unauthorized-should enter the lakes, the gentle 10 to 1 foot interior lake slopes would minimize the risk of injury or drowning. Sixth, although there willte few_users of the site, the use will be exceptionally wellerganized and controlled. Rules governing the site's use have been developed and will be enforced. See Appendix B. Seventh, the traffic generated by the use will be about the equivalent of two to three family residences, far below what might be expected from a property of this size (80 acres). Eighth, the use will be all but invisible to surrounding residences in so much as the property's topography will be used to hide the activity. The lakes dikes will provide2 berm which will-effectively hide any vehicles at the site from neighboring residences. Temporary parking will be accomplished on the southwest area of the property which is surrounded by other open space 'properties. Additionally, the noise from_our activity will-actually be less than that experienced from traffic on roads adjacent to-neighboring residences. Ninth, the type of boats that will be used in our special use -operate on normal automotive gasoline types, regular, unleaded, etc. No oils or other additives are ever mixed with their fuels. Their exhaust has no impact on water quality. They-are_United States Department of Transportation and United States Coast Guard approved. Water quality in the lakes will be helpedsignificantly by the aeration characteristics of the boat's wakes and their prop's turbulence. 890743 1 3 Water circulation through the lakes will be continuous due to irrigation usage, evaporation, etc. The lakes will be deep enough to inhibit sun light, but even so, they will be stocked with fish types known to keep algae growths under control. Water quality will not be affected by erosion and siltation due to the design of the interior lake embankments. The majority of these embankments are sloped 133 feet to 1, the slope at which wave action naturally distributes silt. Tenth, air quality will be safeguarded as construction areas will be restored with natural species, wind breaking trees are being planted, and a portion of the existing dirt roads have been removed, all of which will have a dust abaiting effect. A STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE USES PERMITED WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING SURROUNDING LAND USES (INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING LAND USES OF ALL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY). (24.7.1.3) Approximately 60% of the property is bounded by active farm properties zoned A-1. Approximately 40% is bounded by unincorporated urban residential properties. Many of these property's owners maintain their lots to support equestrian hobbies. This area is zoned R-1. The remainder, approximately 5%, isbounded by County Road 13 and a railroad track. Outlying properties are a combination of active farm properties, open space, and unincorporated urban properties. Our proposed private recreational use is_consistent with the intent of the A-1 and R-1 zone districts in which it will be located. Use as a private recreational facility is provided for in both zone districts-as a Use by Special Review. A major concern for this Special Use is whether or not it can coexist harmoniously with the unincorporated urban residential_properties located adjacent to it. We have every confidence that it will. There are six waterskiing sights located in the Denver metropolitan -area which are located adjacent to similar unincorporated urban hobby properties. Certain of them have been in operation for as long as 25 years and are in fact, typically appreciated by their neighbors. Testimonial letters are provided as appendix M. There are also several man-made lakes used for this purpose around the country. The first man-made lake of this type was built in the late 1960's and is located in near Barstow, California. With it's _proven success, many man-made lakes have been constructed throughout the country since then. They have been located in both rural and urban-settings. Many of themare in the midst of residential developments, and are often combined with other urban type hobby uses such as . private residential / equestrian properties and even private airplane flying. One such three lake facility which is in a suburb of Sacramento, California, is adjacent to a high density single family 890743 14 residential neighborhood,-a private airstrip, as well as open land. The track record has shown that a site of this nature is a compatible neighbor to any type of land use. We have prepared a video tape which demonstrates our use and exemplifies the type of property we hope to become. A copy of this video can be obtained for viewing from Bob Kramer, 429-0840 (Home) or 444-5710 (Work). Starting as long ago as October 10, 1985,we have met with the neighboring property owners to inform them of our intentions, learn of any concerns they might have so that we could adress them, and assure them that we intend to use our property in a manner which would not only be compatible with theirs, but would serve to increase their property values (see Appendix G). Initial reactions were positive and enthusiastic. These meetings, along with several others with local and state agencies and officials, proved an invaluable source of ideas for ways to better our development. The following lists some of the things we have done to accomodate the concerns we learned of: The construction of the lakes incorporate several special design features intended to enhance the safety-and quality of their intended use (interior shoreline slopes of 10 to 1 run the length of the lakes which will eliminate shoreline erosion and reduce the possibility of someone falling into the lake; increased freeboard to allow for continued wave action;-a concrete spillway to eliminate potential for erosion; compaction levels of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM 698-78; and have ensured a controlled release of storm water from the lakes by installing six inch drop'outlets which operate automatically if the water reaches a certain level); we've rerouted and upgraded existing drainageways that were clogged and non-functional from lack of maintenance to eliminate potential erosion of the dikes, increase the drainageway% load carrying capacity, and reduce ground water problems being experienced on a neighboring property; the property has been posted for No Trespassing, and covered-by_one million dollar liability insurance; although there will be few users of the site, the use will be exceptionally well organized and controlled,(rules governing the site's use have been developed and will be enforced -see Appendix B);theproperty's topography will be taken advantage of to hide the activity from neighboring residences.; and we've-even invited the neighbors to participate in the development of our governing rules. Another concern that we're aware-of is that-of-noise. The boats we use have several design features that serve to limit their noise output, including an exhaust system that is designed specifically to minimize noise. First, they_use the same engines that are found in many passenger cars, not race cars. As with passenger car engines, they arebuilt with long term reliability in mind, not speed. High speeds aren't required of these boats as slalom course waterskiing speeds never exceed 36mph. Second, the-engines are-encased by covers that are thickly padded with sound deadening accoustic foam insulation. Third, the engine is located in the -center of the boat, surrounded by the boat's hull, the interior of which is covered by a heavy gauge marine grade of carpeting. Fourth, as stated, the-exhaust system is-designed specifically to minimize noise. At the beginning of the system, water is injected into the engines' exhaust manifolds. The exhaust then 15 890743 flows through two mufflers which are contained beneath the boat's floor-boards. Finally, the exhaust flows out the boat's transom (rear), at water level, through valves that direct it downward. The overall design results in noise output levels that are actually lower than those of the average vehicular traffic that occurs on neighboring roads. A noise report is provided later in this section. A STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AS PERMITTED BY THE EXISTING ZONE AND WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AS PROJECTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE COUNTY OR THE ADOPTED MASTER PLANS OF AFFECTED MUNICIPALITIES. (24.7.1.4) The property is located inside the Firestone urban growth boundary area, is bounded on two sides by urban properties, and is adjacent to an existing municipality. Our proposed private recreational use is an acceptable use in an urban growth boundary area. No extension of services through vacant areas will be required and there will be no competition or conflict between this land use and-rural land use interests. The Special Use that we are applying for will notsignificantly change the land from it's historical use -the land will remain open spaces-only some of it will now be in the form of reservoirs. With the property remaining open space, access and use of the whole property restricted, and the significant increase in the asthetic value of the property, it will become an area of quiet seclusion addressing the needs of our families while maintaining the rural character of the surrounding unincorporated community settlements. We-may-at a later date, apply for a PUD permit on this land. If and when this conversion is applied for and approved, it would be within the agricultural policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the land is located in an urban growth boundary area. It would also be within the agricultural.goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the land is located in an area which is adjacent to an existing incorporated-municipality and would permit low density residential development on non-prime agricultural land. Further, it is bounded on two sides by unincorporated urban residential properties and thus does not disperse this type of land use. No extension of services through vacant -areas would be required and there would be no competion or conflict between this land use and rural land use interests. If and when this conversion is applied for and approved, it would also be within the Unincorporated Community and Planned Unit Development goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan in so much as the development would maintain the rural character of these settlements, would benefit Weld citizens with improved aesthetics and a significant provision for open space, and would also be a creative-approach to land development which would result in an environment of distinctive identity and character. 16 890743 A STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW AREA IS NOT LOCATED IN A FLOOD PLAIN, GEOLOGICAL HAZARD AND WELD COUNTY AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT AREA; OR THAT THE APPLICATION COMPLIES WITH SECTION FIFTY (50), OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. (24.7.1.5) The property lies outside all restricted districts and zones referenced in section fifty (50) of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. PROOF THAT A WATER SUPPLY WILL BE AVAILABLE WHICH IS ADEQUATE IN TERMS OF QUANTITY, QUALITY, AND DEPENDABILITY (E.G., A WELL PERMIT OR LETTER FROM A WATER DISTRICT). No central water supply is required for the special use being applied for. Please see Appendicies C& D as proof of the water sources used for our lakes. A COPY OF THE DEED OR LEGAL INSTRUMENT IDENTIFYING THE APPLICANT(S) INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION. IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNS THE APPLICATION FOR THE FEE OWNER(S), A LETTER GRANTING POWER OF ATTORNEY TO THE AGENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) SHALL BE PROVIDED. Please see Appendix H. A NOISE REPORT, UNLESS WAIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES, DOCUMENTING THE METHODS TO BE UTILIZED TO MEET THE APPLICABLE NOISE STANDARD. (24.7.5.4) For those people associated with slalom course waterskiing, the noise generated by the type of boat we will be using is known to be minimal. However, many people have only been exposed to recreational waterskiing in open lakes where boat noise can be excessive. This is especially true with "jet"or"dry stack" (non-muffled) exhaust system boats. The boats we use however, have several design features that serve to limit their noise output, including an exhaust system that is designed specifically to minimize noise. First, they use the same engines that are found in many passenger cars, not race cars. As with passenger car engines, they are built with long term reliability in mind, not speed. High speeds aren't required of these-boats as 1 890743 slalom course waterskiing speeds never exceed 36mph. Second, the engines are encased by covers that are thickly padded with sound deadening accoustic foam insulation. Third, the engine is located in the center of the boat, surrounded by the boat's hull, the interior of which is covered by a heavy gauge marine grade of carpeting. Fourth, as stated, the exhaust system is designed specifically to minimize noise. At the beginning of the system, water is injected into the engines' exhaust manifolds. The exhaust then flows through two mufflers which are contained beneath the boat's floor-boards. Finally, the exhaust flows out the boat's transom (rear), at water level, through valves that direct it downward. The overall design results in noise output levels that are actually lower than those of average vehicular traffic. The following table shows a noise level comparison between boats of the type which we will be using and vehicular traffic. For clarification purposes, noise data for vehicular traffic was gathered from an unobstructed, paved section of US 395 located in Douglas County, Nevada. Noise data for boat traffic was gathered on a man-made waterski lake in Sacramento, California. The terrain at both locations are flat and free of noise distorting obstructions. The data was gathered with a model 1565B sound level meter manufactured by General Radio. Using background level readings, a calibration of the instrument was made by utilizing mathematical procedures-obtained and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as well as the Nevada Department of Transportation. Noise level readings in decibles were obtained at 100, 200, and 300 foot offsets from the center-line of the highway as well as the center-line of the lake. Vehicular traffic was broken down into three groups: passenger cars; pickups, vans and motorhomes; and light duty trucks. It did not include heavy duty or diesel trucks. Themoises were the maximums registered-as the vehicles passed by. Noise from the boats were the maximums registered during a 36mph drive-by. A 36mph drive by was chosen as it is the maximum speed at which slalom course waterskiing is performed. It should be noted however, that 95% of all slalom course waterskiing is done at speeds lower than 36mph where significantly lower noise levels are experienced. NOISE COMPARISON AWSA TYPE BOAT vs VEHICULAR TRAFFIC Noise Source: Noise Level (decibles): 100ft 200ft 300ft Passenger Cars 61-71 56-61 46-52 Pickups, Vans & Motorhomes 66-72 62-70 48-58 Light Duty Trucks 72-77 68-70 58-62 AWSA Type Boats 62-67 56-59 45-50 18 890743 As shown by the results of this testing, an AWSA type boat operating even at maximum speed is quieter than the traffic that would be typical to the roads adjacent our site. Additionally, the centerlines of our lakes are at their closest points, between 200 and 1600 feet further in distance to any neighboring residential structure than the centerlines of adjacent roads. A SOIL REPORT OF THE SITE PREPARED BY THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE OR BY A SOILS ENGINEER OR SCIENTIST. IN THOSE INSTANCES WHEN THE SOIL REPORT INDICATES THE EXISTENCE OF MODERATE OR SEVERE SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR THE USES PROPOSED, THE APPLICANT SHALL DETAIL THE METHODS TO BE EMPLOYED TO MITIGATE THE LIMITATIONS. (XXXXX) No moderate or severe soil limitations exist for the use proposed. See attached engineer's report (Appendix E) and soil test (Appendix I). A CERTIFIED LIST OF THE NAMES, ADDRESSES AND THE CORRESPONDING PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ASSIGNED BY THE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR OF THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY (THE SURFACE ESTATE) WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE APPLICATION. (24.7.2.9) Please see Appendix J. A CERTIFIED LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF MINERAL OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS ON OR UNDER THE PARCEL OF LAND BEING CONSIDERED. (24.7.2.10) Please see Appendix K. SECTION 4 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT PLAN MAP (24.7.2.10) Please see Appendicies L & M. SECTION 5 DOES NOT REQUIRE A RESPONSE HERE 890743 19 SECTION 6 WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 24.5 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION (24.5.1 thru 24.5.11) 24.5.1.1 There are no central water requirements for the proposed use. The lakes will be filled, kept at appropriate levels, and augmentation requirements provided for by surface water from two unnamed tributaries to St. Vrain Creek, said surface water originating from seepage, waste, drainage, and tailwater associated with natural precipitation, irrigation operations, and water storage operations in areas surrounding the reservoirs; and surface water from unnamed springs originating on the property. Irrigation water will be provided by six shares of Lower Boulder Ditch Company. See Exibits C & D. (Findings and ruling of the referee and decree of the water court, District Court, Water Division 1, CO.; Lower Boulder Ditch Co. share certificate). 24.5.1.2 Vaulted toilets will be constructed per the recommendation of the Weld County Department of Health. 24.5.1.3 No soil conditions exist on site that present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of the vaulted toilets or boat docks to be constructed on the site. See appendix I, soil test report. 24.5.1.4 All of the owner's boats are equipped with Coast Guard approved fire extinguishers. If additional fire protection services are ever required,they will be provided by: Longmont Fire Protection District 9119 County Line Road Longmont, COB0501 772-0710 They estimate their response time to the site at seven minutes. 24.5.1.5 890743 20 • The Special Use that we are applying for will not significantly change the land from it's historical use -the land will remain open space only some of it will now be in the form of reservoirs. The reservoirs were designed, engineered and approved in accordance with requirements set forth by the Office of the State Engineer - Division of Water Resources. Their use will enhance the storm water retention capabilities of the property and have no effect on the level of ground water in the surrounding area. See attached engineer's report (appendix E). The dikes used to construct the reservoirs are classified by the Office of the State Engineer - Division of Water Resources as Non - Jurisdictional Water Impoundment Structures. It should be noted however, that several design features were incorporated in the construction of these lakes that are in excess of the design standards required for this type of structure. All of these were deemed advisable by our group, and two of them (extra freeboard and rerouting of existing drainageways) were recommended by the State Engineer's office, to insure the continued safe operation of the lakes given our special use intentions. The special design features include: interior shoreline slopes of 10 to 1 run the length of the lakes, the slope at which wave action naturally forces the distribution of dirt or sand, which will eliminate shoreline erosion; increased freeboard to allow for wave action; a concrete spillway to eliminate potential for erosion; compaction levels of 95% of standard Proctor density ASTM 698-78; and have ensured a controlled release of storm water from the lakes by installing six inch drop outlets which operate automatically if the water reaches a certain level. We have also rerouted and upgraded existing drainageways to eliminate potential erosion of the dikes and increase the drainageway's load carrying capacity; No paved roads or parking lots will be constructed on the property. Part of the dirt roads that had existed on the property have been removed as a result of the construction of the lakes, what remains will be used for access. The minimal parking requirements will be accomodated on unimproved areas of the property. 24.5.1.6 No paved parking lots will be constructed on the property. The minimal parking requirements will be accomodated on unimproved areas of the property. 24.5.1.7 All offsets and setbacks are in compliance with the requirements of the A-1 zone district in which the property is located. See the plot plan map in Section 4. 24.5.1.8 890743 21 Access to the property is provided at one point from Weld County Road 13. Impact to this road during high volume traffic periods will be all but non-existent due to the nature of this special use. Summer weekends, holidays, and vacations will be the most likely times the site will be accessed for this use. The roads on the property are made of dirt. 24.5.1.9 The lakes dikes will provide a berm which will effectively hide any vehicles at the site from neighboring residences. Temporary parking will be accomplished on the southwest area of the property which is surrounded by other open space properties. The lakes themselves are considered open space and will increase the aesthetic and property values of this and surrounding properties. See appendix G. 24.5.1.11 The most eastern section of the site has been left open and earmarked for our agricultural activities. This is the only area of the property which can be irrigated, a necessity for agricultural productivity according to the Soil Survey of Weld County done by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. This survey was bo me out by the soil tests conducted at the site. See appendix I. SECTION 7 WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 24.6 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION (24.6.1.1 thru 24.6.1.6) 24.6.1.1 The following table shows a noise level comparison between boats of the type which we will be using and vehicular traffic. For clarification purposes, noise data for vehicular traffic was gathered from an unobstructed, paved section of US 395 located in Douglas County, Nevada. Noise data for boat traffic was gathered on a man-made waterski lake in Sacramento, California. The terrain at both locations are flat and free of noise distorting obstructions. The data was gathered with a model 1565B sound level meter manufactured by General Radio. Using background level readings, a calibration of the instrument was made by utilizing mathematical procedures obtained and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency as well as the Nevada Department of Transportation. Noise level readings in decibles were obtained at 100, 200, and 300 foot offsets from the center-line of the highway as well as the center-line of the lake. 22 890743 • Vehicular traffic was broken down into three groups: passenger cars; pickups, vans and motorhomes; and light duty trucks. It did not include heavy duty or diesel trucks. The noises were the maximums registered as the vehicles passed by. Noise from the boats were the maximums registered during a 36mph drive-by. A 36mph drive by was chosen as it is the maximum speed at which slalom course waterskiing is performed. It should be noted however, that 95% of all slalom course waterskiing is done at speeds lower than 36mph where significantly lower noise levels are experienced. NOISE COMPARISON AWSA TYPE BOAT vs VEHICULAR TRAFFIC Noise Source: Noise Level (decibles): 100ft 200ft 300ft Passenger Cars 61-71 56-61 46-52 Pickups, Vans & Motorhomes 66-72 62-70 48-58 Light Duty Trucks 72-77 68-70 58-62 AWSA Type Boats 62-67 56-59 45-50 As shown by the results of this testing, an AWSA type boat operating even at maximum speed is quieter than the traffic that would be typical to the roads adjacent our site. Additionally, the centerlines of our lakes are at their closest points, between 200 and 1600 feet further in distance to any neighboring residential structure than the centerlines-of adjacent roads. The boats we use have several design features that serve to limit their noise output, including an exhaust system that is designed specifically to minimize noise. First, they use the same engines that are found in many passenger cars, not race cars. As with passenger car engines, they are built with long term reliability in mind, not speed. High speeds aren't required of these boats as slalom course waterskiing speeds never exceed 36mph. Second, the engines are encased by covers that are thickly padded with sound deadening accoustic foam insulation. Third, the engine is located in the center of the boat, surrounded by the boat's hull, the interior of which is covered by a heavy gauge marine grade of carpeting. Fourth, as stated, the exhaust system is designed specifically to minimize noise. At the beginning of the system, water is injected into the engines' exhaust manifolds. The exhaust then flows through two mufflers which are contained beneath the boat's floor-boards. Finally, the exhaust flows out the boat's transom (rear), at water level, through valves that direct it downward. The overall design results in noise output levels that are actually lower than those of average vehicular traffic. 23 890 743 24.6.1.2 Lake dike construction areas are being revegitated with natural species;wind breaking trees are being planted; and access roads are being removed in the process of constructing the lakes, all of which will have a dust abaiting effect. The minimal traffic the site will experience from our special use will have a negligable impact on air quality. 24.6.1.3 The type of boats that will be used in our special use operate on normal automotive gasoline types, regular, unleaded, etc. No oils or other additives are ever mixed with their fuels. Their exhaust has no impact on water quality. They are United States Department of Transportation and United States Coast Guard approved. Water quality in the lakes will be helped significantly by the aeration characteristics of the boat's wakes and their prop's turbulence. Water circulation through the lakes will be continuous due to irrigation usage, evaporation, etc., and the addition of fresh water for replacement. The lakes will be deep enough to inhibit sun light. Even so,the lakes will be stocked with fish types known to keep algae growths under control. Water quality will not be affected by erosion and siltation due to the design of the interior lake embankments. The majority of these embankments are sloped 10 feet to 1, the slope at which wave action naturally distributes silt. 24.6.1.4 No light source of the type or nature described in this section will be used at the site. 24.6.1.5 Our use will not emit heat so as to raise the temperature of the air more than five (5) degrees Farenheit at or beyond the lot line. 24.6.1.6 Natural vegetation species will be maintained on the property. 890743 24 Airnd;x A THE SLALOM COURSE (not to scale) boat path skier path • entrance buoys V buoy #1 • • • • • • buoy #2 buoy #3 • • • • • • buoy #4 buoy #5 • • • • • • buoy #6 • • exit buoys The slalom course is identical from either end and the first buoy on the skier's right hand side is always the #1 buoy. 690743 Attachment B LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SKI CLUB RULES 1) Only AWSA approved tournament boats owned by and registered to a shareholder, or jointly by more than one shareholder, or by the Corporation will be allowed access to the lakes at any time. 2) A shareholder must be present during the operation of any boat on the lakes. 3) Swimming will be supervised at all times by the immediate presence of at least one shareholder. No swimming shall be allowed at any time a boat is in operation on a lake. Anyone under the age of sixteen years must wear a Coast Guard approved life vest at any time they are in the water. 4) The Corporation and each shareholder will maintain in an active, paid, and current status, a minimum $500,000.00 liability insurance policy to cover the operation of any boat that is used on the lake. These policies must name the Corporation as co-insured and be officially copied to the secretary of the Corporation directly by the insurance company. Notice of any policy changes must be made to the secretary of the Corporation directly by the insurance company. Compliance with this rule shall be the responsibility of the shareholder. 5) All guests of shareholders before they are allowed any access to the lakes, shall be required to sign a liability waiver and release for themselves and any accompanying minors, releasing the Corporation and it's shareholders from any responsibility or liability for any injury or property damage that might occur during or as a result of , their visit to the property. It shall be the responsibility of the sponsoring shareholder to obtain this waiver and release and to make the original of it available to the secretary of the Corporation. Any negligence of this responsibility by a shareholder shall make him subject to a $500.00 fine payable to the Corporation, liable for payment of any judgements brought against the Corporation by the guest, and the temporary or permanent loss of the shareholder's lake access permit or guest priveledges as determined by the remaining shareholders majority vote. 890743 Aprend'ix DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 1, COLORADO CASE NO. 85CW443 , ','3 FINDINGS AND RULING OF THE REFEREE AND DECREE' OF THE WATER COURT CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF: MARTIN WOODBURY, IN WELD COUNTY. THIS CLAIM, having been filed with the Water Clerk, Water Division No. 1, on December 31, 1985, and the Referee being fully advised in the premises, does hereby find: All notices required by law of the filing of this application have been fulfilled, and the Referee has jurisdiction of this application and over all parties affected hereby, whether they have appeared or not. None of the lands or water rights involved in this case are within the boundaries of a designated groundwater basin. No statement of opposition to said application has been filed, and the time for filing such statement has expired. All matters contained in the application having been reviewed and testimony has been taken where such testimony was necessary, and such corrections made as were indicated by the evidence presented. IT IS HEREBY THE RULING OF THE WATER REFEREE: 1. Name and Address of Claimant: Martin Woodbury 8127 Anchor Drive Longmont, CO 80501 2 . Name of Reservoirs: (a) I,akevi-ew No. 1 (b) Lakeview No. 2 • 3 . Legal Description of Reservoirs: (a) Lakeview No. 1 - The reservoir is to be constructed on an unnamed tributary of St. Vrain Creek and the outlet for said reservoir is to be located in the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13 , 890743 Findings and auling of the Ref-eree and Decree Case No. -85EW443 Page 2 T 2 N, R 68 W, 6th F.M. , Weld County, Colorado, at a point approximately 1, 420 feet south of the north line and 2 ,340 feet west of the east line of said -Section 13 . (b) Lakeview No. 2 — The reservoir is to be constructed on and between two unnamed tributaries of 3t. Vrain _Creek and the outlet for s-aid reservoir is to be located in the NW 1/A -of the NE 1/-4 -of S-ection 13 , T 2 N, R 58 W, -6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, at a point approximately 1, 040 f-eet south of the north line and 2 ,340 feet west of the east line of said Section 13 . 4 . Source of Water: Surface -water from two -unnamed tributaries to St. Vrain Creek, said surface water originating from seepage, waste , drainage, and tailwat-er associated -with natural precipitaticn, irrigation operations, and water storage operations in areas surrounding the reservoirs ; and surface water from unnamed springs originating on the Lakeview Subdivision property located in the NE 1/4 of Section 13 , T 2 N, i2 68 W, fsth P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said property being -more particularly described in Exhibit a attach-ed hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5 . Date -of Appro riation: January 31, 1985 . 6 . Amount -of Water: (a) Lakeview No. 1 - 55 acre feet, CONDITIONAL. (b) Lakeview No. 2 - 55 acre feet, CONDITIONAL. 7 . Use of Water: Recreation, pisc-atorial , stock .catering, and irrigation of up to 2D acres located in the SW 1/4 and of the NE 1/4 Section 13 , T 2 N, R b8 W, 6th F.M. , Weld County, _Colorado. 890743 • - Findings and Ruling of the Referee and Decree Case No. 85CW443 Page 3 8 . Size of Reservoirs : (a) Lakeview No. 1 i . Surface Area of High Wat-er Line: 11 acres ii. Maximum Height of San: 9 feet iii. Length of Dam: 1,500 feet (b) Lakeview No. 2 i. Surface Area of High Water Line: 13 acres ii. Maximum Height of Dam: 9 feet iii. Length of Dam: 1,500 feet 9 . Total Capacity of Reservoirs: (a) Lak-eview No. -1 Active Capacity: 55 acre feet Dead Storage: None (b) Lakeview No. 2 Active Capacity: 65 acre feet Dead Storage: None 10 . This water right is subject to administration by the State Engineer pursuant -to C.R.S . § _37-92-502 , as amended. Wat-er shall not be impounded, except pursuant to the operation of a lawful exchange, unless entitled to -do su by virtue -of the priority ₹:erein a-warded. At all other times, an inflow of wat-er into the reservoir from any source, including precipitation, shall be removed -by Claimant or Claimant' s successors in interest by -draining, pumping or other means, and released into the nearest natural watercourse or below t₹:e reservoir, and not utilized by Claimant or Claimant ' s successors in interest in any manner. Claimant shall install and maintain such meters, measuring devices or ot₹:er structures as may _bQ required by the Division Engineer of Water Division No. 1. 890 743 Findings and Ruling of the Referee and Decree Case No. 85CW443 Page 4 11 . The priority herein awarded was filed in the Water Court in the year of 1985 and shall be administered as having been filed in that year; and shall be junior to all priorities filed in previous years. A$ between all rights filed in the same calendar year, prioriti-es shall be determined by historical dates of appropriation and are not affected by the date of entry of ruling. 12 . It is also ordered that the conditional right herein awarded is hereby continued in full force and effect until July. 1990 . If Claimant desires to maintain such conditional decree, an application for a -quadrennial finding of reasonable diligence shall be filed on or before July, 1990 or a showing made on or before such date that the conditional water right that become an absolute water right by reason of the completion of the appropriation. Dated this 30th day of July , 19_86 . 1-1 YM9} S . LIES .AN Wat Referee Water Division No. 1 State of Colorado THE COURT FINDS: NO PROTEST WAS FILED IN THIS MATTER. THE FOREGOING RULING IS CONFIRMED AND APPROVED, AND IS HEREBY MADE -THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THIS COURT. Dated: ROBERT A. BEHRMAN Water Judge Water Division No. 1 State of Colorado 890743 N0 B 1231 REC 02178608 05/04/89 15:21 $3.00 1/001 F 1176 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO QUIT CLAIM DEED • 'MISDEED. Made Ihia Jar of . 19 89, hclwccn Martin Woodbury • 8127 Anchor Drive • Longmont, CO 805O1 ill the •Ctmmy :ft Boulder and Scee:,l Colormregfantonx and Lakeview Village, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under ,land by virtue of the laws of the State of ! Colorado, H who:cclegalnddressic 700 Florida, Suite P2O3, Longmont, CO 80501 of the C only of Boulder and State of Colorado.grantced6. WIINESSE'II.Thai the er:intuit0.lor:md in emrsidetnnan nl the stun of Ten ($10.00) and no/100---- DOLLARS the receipt and sal heteney of whidt n hoe1w.tls an,led1e d.has temped.released,cold,convet.ed and QUI CLAINILD.and by these presets doe s temne.rclrase,cell.car vcv and()WI /'LAIN unto the granmepp. its heirs.cuccescnrs and assigns. ' lorevcr. all the r lghL Ode. Innn:fa. claim and demand width the firuntu,Q4f has in and to the real prnlxny. together with improvements.it any.situate,lying aml Temp in the County of Weld and State of Colorado,described as follows. • • H The water rights associated with Lakeview Reservoir No. 1 • and Lakeview Reservoir No. 2 as decreed in Case No. 85CW443, • H District Court, Water Division 1, Colorado on August 29, 1986. III' aluskaru-ob succuotltauatia“s'. 1O HAVE AND TD HOLD the saute,together with all and singular the appurtenances and privilege,thereunto belonging er in anywise diercmmr appertaining.find all the estate.right.title.l'netest and claim whatsoever,of the granwrpl 1,tither in law Of cyn lty.m the only proper use,hcnc lit and heir,stl of the granlect$1, i t S heirs and acsig OS forever.t. fit a executed this deed on the dam v eel forth above IN�WITNESS WIIERGOP,The g'rt al ha,ts ce I //7" ze<,a C'r lf e -er 3/3 /8 II H MARTIN WOODBURY / 11 STATE OF COLORADO. County of 2RGC/t.V7 — }« The fore gain p incimmenl was aeknuwledged before me this 3L) day of M v0 Kl.C . I`S9 by Martin Woodbury. My cotnrtti„itm enpims . rep. Witness my lined and ollic,.d scad• My Commcion Winn AeSt 19. 4910 600floM1dg bbeam .� f t 1 won � Do 0:30743 Append•,x D • r oie o. Kaj AI 1.4 eekc C "• CO ^ y�.L 7 �W ti Cas • C P e C .rj c y fiAl. ki J V I •H V U C r-, X' o +, > t Fa _.- 7. .z o ZO o f �k rat A ' ' aeV m ( ♦r • U 4 _. Z c -e .-� o 1 - Z.,„ . , 2 2 1 jti,a,J' 0 C �' ,. C _ _ ♦df IOW h. V _ y FT • �r�♦ b \ t t 1.j ��C O a -1 L_ 1 ;j. .H M r F • C O " 'C ; t W !'� .. ^ U N fl ,C I a ‘: P4 tv tA ♦GAY no W % v .`� '� - in s ts. - •g5 z. 1/40c t a /V/ I C Z H i M. c' 41-�� c. • AA N .O C - 2 f i • r...r ro •7 c a �`4 r-1 3 .., ,Lip: 1.) gm. TT� p - a ` C O) wo ethfAt x t7 � ti, 7 fa 4V ♦. E r 1�J dVF1vT J.N 'N a- a,'b' a' ferw aka a rr'Ir . + - 7 x®743 1 Aerv.A,z E GILLAN'S ENGINEERING, INC. _G_ Engineering Surveying 5126 W. 38TH AVENUE DENVER, CO 80212 CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 303/480-0471 SUBDIVISION PLANNING & SURVEYING APRIL 4, 1989 89C102 BOB KRAMER RE: SPECIAL USE PERMIT; TWO WATER SKI RESERVOIRS, WELD COUNTY SECTIONS 24. 5. 1. 5, 24. 5. 1. 5. 1, 24.5. 1. 5.2 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: THERE WILL BE NO SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN STORM -WATER RUNOFF WHEN SITE IS DEVELOPED. HISTORIC FLOW PATHS EXITING PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN ALTERED TO ANY GREAT EXTENT. SECTIONS IN THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT DEALING WITH STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITIES AND RATE OF RUNOFF SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED SINCE DEVELOPED RUNOFF CONDITIONS ARETHE SAME OR HAVE DECREASED FROM HISTORICAL CONDITIONS. THE ORIGINAL SITE SLOPED TO THE WEST, NORTHWEST WITH NATIVE AND PLANTED VEGETATION. THE PROPOSED SITE CREATES TWO WATER SKI RESERVOIRS. THE UPPER PORTION OF THE -PROPERTY WAS DUG OUT WITH THE OVERBURDEN BEING DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE RESERVOIRS PERIMETERS TO BUILD DP A LEVEE. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, NATIVE GRASSES WILL BE PLANTED OVER THE DISTURBED SITE. ALL ACCESS ROADS AND SMALL PARKING -LOT WILL BE NATURAL SOILS OR OVERLAID WITH GRAVEL. MO NON-PERMEABLE SURFACE, OR LARGE STRUCTURES ARE PLANNED AT THIS STAGE. IT IS GILLAN'S ENGINEERING, INC. 'S BELIEF THAT THE PROPOSED SITE, -WHEN COMPLETED, WILL NOT INCREASE STORM WATER RUNOFF, -BUT RATHER DECREASE IT DUE TO THE DETENTION CAP-ABILITIES OF THE SKI RESERVOIRS. HISTORIC FLOW PATHS LEAVING THE -PROPERTY HAVE NOT -BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY ALTERED AT EXIT POINTS. IF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE SITE ARE CHANGED IN -THE FUTURE TO INCLUDE SURFACED "ROADS AND/OR SIZABLE STRUCTURES, THE INCREASED RUNOFF RATE AND DETENTION FACILITIES - WILL HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY -A QUALIFIED ENGINEER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL. SINCERELY, ALAN D. GILLAN ADG/id $90743 �cHr Or r Appevldix F '- United States Department of the Interior riH `2 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE - COLORADO FIELD OFFICE 23051MMSSTREET Atth° ^4° ROOM 292 GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401 IN REPLY REFER'PO: FWE/LO MAR _-6 'meg Tom Rutt 619 Alkire-e Golden, Colorado 8D4D1 Dear Mr. Rutt: By telephone call on February 1# , 1989 , you notified us of your intention to control prairie _dogs at two lakes which are under construction, 2 miles forth of Fredricks , Colorado, near the intersection of -Road 13 and 22 . The control site is the dikes, constitute less than 3 acres , and is bordered on two sides by the Buffalo Acres Subdivision. Pursuant to the label for the control chemical , you have contacted us to determine if black-footed ferrets , a Federally listed endangered species , may to present at the site where the control is to occur. The issue is that prairie dog control may adversely affect black-looted ferrets, directly by killing ferrets or indirectly by destroying their primary food base, the prairie dog. The Service 's interest in this matter is limited to determining the likelihood of black-footed ferrets being present in the control area -and if present ensuring that they are not adversely impacted. Under certain circumstances , the Service believes that there is very little chance that ferrets could occur at a specific prairie dog town. These conditions are : 1 . There are fewer than 250 acres of prairie _dog holes within 7 kilometers (4 .2 miles) of the proposed control site . 2 . There is a high degree of urbanization in the immediate area of the control site , or; 820743 T. Rutt 2 3 . There has been a black-footed ferret survey conducted in the control area which has resulted in no -ferrets being located. For your particular control site, based on information you have provided, we believe that condition number 2 applies and the area can be considered urbanized. There is very little chance that black-footed ferrets occur at the control site . If we can be of further assistance, please let us know. / Sincerely, etaLeRo W. Carlson Colorado State Supervisor cc : FWS/FWE, SLC ,UT FWS/FWE, Denver -FWE/FWE, GRJCT CDOW, (Dave Weber) $90743 Appcndlx U January 13, 1989 Mr. Steve Anderson Mr. Martin Woodbury In reference to our discussion on property values around or overlooking a lake. It is my opinion the existing property values of land or building sites that overlook a lake or golf course double in value. Them are several examples in and around the Longmont area. The Greens Subdivision in northwest Longmont - building sites that overlook the golf course are double the price of sites in the same subdivision that do not have the view amenity. The Shores Subdivision - lots close to McIntosh Lake or that have the view are considerably more expensive than those with limited or no view. (McIntosh is a private lake leased to a ski club that includes Approximately 28 _boats.) The homes on Lakeshore Drive in Longmont Estates on the south edge of McIntosh Lake sell for more because of the view. Gaynor Lake, 2 miles south of Longmont has a very solid reputation and commands a higher price for the homes because of the lake and the view. A building site on Anchor Drive just sold lnr $50,000.00 and only had a limited view of the lake. I could continue with examples of property values around Terry Lake, also a private lake, Highland Lake, Lone Tree and numerous others throughout Boulder, Larimer and Weld Counties, -not to mention the golf courses. Of course, property values are established by the developers on new subdivisions and the knowledgeable purchaser on sesal.e of building sites or existing homes. In view of the existing down real estate market where -property values -have dropped 5 to 10 percent , I believe the construction of a lake would benefit the present home and land owners to help recover some of their losses, should they be in the market to sell in the near future. Any vle-w of a lake or -golf course creates a more positive influence than a negative when the property is being viewed by a prospective purchaser. This is my opinion only as a Real Estate Broker in the Longmont area for 12 years. I have no interest in owning or purchasing any property now or in the future in or around your proposed development. I have received no compensation for this letter in any form. e Tho pson Broker Assbciate CRS, GRI 890743 AIi2L1,S'I4'I - 1 : 19 1EC 02165949 12/22/88 16:_ $6.00 1/002 a 1655 PARS IIIIN IEUEI+GTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO KARRAN'f1' I/U ISU j ''Ills DEED,blade Our 20th Jay o1 December [^ II 1988.between EILEEN L. HUMMEL,II -i'-^ y D II formerly Eileen L. Newton /el' 12,2 -,Yd".... H3, iu Ir" of ore *Comity of Arapahoe __. _ ___. ' z Slane ei Colorado,grans,.and LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC, e cortur ern organised end gaining under and hp eerie of the laws of the Slate of Colorado .pr:nec whore legal aJAress h II 700 Florida Avenue, Suite F203, Longmont, CO 80501 II \VI I NE.SSryl II.1 ler the green.for and in eonereration of the ruin Of \ l ---ONE IItINDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($1.35,000.00) DOLLARS.Ieemmr,rnJ wrle<iu¢y of which iaimreby:mbuekdge,l.11aa granted.bur `1 re re ,ru n '.nook...blandconveyed. 5III! Iner<tierce,disc a .nt bargain.sell.bar nliun.arm lL< arr¢a.le `Rr Fb � c Fr ors antl a. fr.lunar.A 4.4 tierbipolar, II teal;ul the Corny.,] .l o cal loop<nydxor do.d enure.s n sulw¢.IylnR and Weld end timrc.J Colorado.JcvIM1rJ as billows ll SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION II • aiarr known by sheet and number as: Vacant Land — Weld Cou nty, Colorado ousel o Dr 1 .I,I IIl:R one all and regular lee hertJrnmm�s and a. Irnlernoaea cheerer,belonging�� all d u F g Y 'I.a d eg.ice and the c, III 1I bargained 1.and all I gl t I. b and 1 J 1'l.rrever of lM1e h III grantor. II I I I. J or I I h F 11 r..wall 0rehereditament. I I(I II /F \M)II)1101.111 Jp raer°hsebarrelled: h d dr.rd ' .x'lh Jr Il e' l ohe graoice.or..ucce6o4aand armee Glen.Anal Ile ginning lire himself.hi.hear and1 I repercniareerepee incriani.gram,bargain arid idee to and v.'Oh M1 F'a I s J aregns.lhat al the tree olthe ease:ding and delete id there preroor,he Ir NellWiled eJ 1 grant Mien. absolute I- I ! M1I et f' n 1 - 1. simple. 11'.ward -'1 lull I I I' I I. lhr , II and 1.411.1.1C of J and eat var Etc addeoI r all hurler a t ns :r a ssd y ur rhrite arid 1,1140144Val wL:nrver kind ur lramre seen.c¢an ru: rl poor L.l sale..lens.rs.ta n.runs, I general taxes from 1988; and subject to covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements, oil and gas leases, II existing ditches, and rights—of—way of record, if any, 'Ille F' I ll midwit!WARRANT AND IORLVLR DIJENUrh<Sete J 1 'w (411:144140,111111471114 lqmitt l . 'M D sr nab <gn grantee,and g aglr.l all and Vey lrr•amnr Kerne Ian hilly a hieingI hide or are par leered I Ile entelatnumber dell include Ileplural the plunk the slgul'r_anti doer crl ns gender ball he vier able PO an gcndcr. IN IV I NESS R IIf:N EDI,.Tee grantor bar tact riled this deed on the Joe.el Iv e:dnnt II s seirye / l Ei leen ten L Il untmel formerly -_ XE_i ri _ 1I en L. Newton II S TAI 1,151-CU1(JNA DO. ('aunty of Boulder II 1 be i.egoonF In, aLrrtrn was:mkm.x leJFnl hlbrc nor leis 20thIl da>od December I II r Eileanrr � 88 , ,IltlY1T,, oriel, formerly Eileen L. Newton. II frIvt'y,{7p' ,eC{2t v fjC+03-91 II ' W11Np1/49ar.2illd Mbclnt real t:9f p�D1_IL R' ` l:-41 L'',� a! ., III 1317 Spruce Street,lrBoulder, CO 80302 I I - l No.952.Rev.l-fly. eARRAN II DELI,one urporareur pr Poe .nnareela Ree d <r`ill.1i ./ IIr.Nn.rl NFliva,ng,a AIM pub A,e,lalcvur,l tllxn.11—�rnrr_rie,y., 890743 B 1279 PEC 02165949 12/22/88 16 : 10 $6 .00 2/002 F 1656 VARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO EXHIBIT "A" Covering the Land in the State of Colorado, County of Weld. Described as : All that portion of the NE1/4 of Section 13 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , and that portion of the herein described property lying within Lot 12 , of the recorded plat of BUFFALO ACRES SUBDIVISION, described as follows : BEGINNING at a point on the South line of the NE1/4 of sai-d Section 13 from which the East Quarter Corner of said Section 13 bears N89' 33 ' E 400.0 feet; thence S89' 33 'W 2 , 265 . 0 feet along the South line of said NE1/4 to the center of Section 13; thence N00' 36 'W 1 , 778 . 76 feet along the West line of the NE1/4 of said Section 13 to the Southwest Corner of BUFFALO ACRES, a recorded Subdivision of a portion of the NE1/4 of Section 13 ; thence East along the South line of Lot 1 , BUFFALO ACRES, 461 .09 feet; thence S84' 30 ' E along the Southerly line of Lots 2 , 3 , 4 , and 5, BUFFALO ACRES, in the approximate center of a large drainage -ditch a distance of 1 , 195 . 52 feet; thence South at a right angle to the North line of said Section 13 , a distance of 875.0 feet; thence East parallel to the North line of Section 13 a distance of 1 , 023. 54 feet to a point on the East line of Secti-on 13; thence S00' 40' E 492 . 2 feet along the East line of said Section 13 ; thence S89. 33 'W 400 .9 feet parallel to the South line of the NE1/4 of Section 13; thence S00' 40 ' E 276 . 0 feet parallel to the East line of Section 13 , to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH the non-exclusive right to use right of way and utility easement situated over and across the West X10 feet of Lot 1 , BUFFALO ACRES SUBDIVISION, as -set forth on the recorded plat thereof . 8027472 890743 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property La -.i .,., y' ane Itc . STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the • Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records , or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. 11 11 \ ' fI t li)te7, o-The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this llnday 11 -77 , 1942 by gel KY'aMer rX LnA„Ie,A vlkney .Ttio . WITNESS my hand and official seal . My Commission expires : /( /I -Y c-J,-, cc/vi,24,,,,_ _ Notark/ Public 890743 PROPERTY LINE I I SCALE B-1 o• li I 300' TEST HOLE B 2 I • BB=9 B_• BB=B B_S rii 13-15 0 X \ 0 a a 10 N-\- 10 ' WATER LEVEL SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS TYPE OF MATERIAL C..ne..r�.� Guiding wn.Ir"' Air..mra omn. Wow Wet Uncenrinp $A 1,,.,tlspivs. Dn.in p.,,.nr T. caps co w.gnr ^Br4 • spivs. 0, PASHTO m..., . * Y T s r. 0' ""o".. SANDY CLAY r;ivdcat B—I 0.0'-8.0' Sandy Clay 4-4(2) 0 6 44 50 75 15 10 8 1 IIS 6 NI CLAY B-2 8.0'-10.0 Clay A-6031 0 1 1] 82 31 20 II 4.4 112.5, B-3 0.01-6.01 Clayey Sand A-4(0) 0 11 52 37 24 17 7 ).1 6-4 0.0'-12.0' Silty Sand A-2-4(0) 0 26 54 20 NV NP NP 4.6CLAYEY SAND B-5 0.0'-I2.0' Sandy Clay A-4(4) 0 3 34 63 27 12 10 11.9 .�y ,.."'1,, SILTY SAND A1Pn,dl+ L 1 - 890743 Appe.vd,;x LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET NAM F; ADDRESS. TOWN / CITY ASSESSOR'S PARCFI STATF AND 71P CODF IDENTIFICATION # Wargo, Howard J. & Marie C. 5532 Weld Co. Rd. 22 1313-13-1-01-001 Longmont, CO 80501 Newton,Raymond L. & 5662 Weld Co. Rd. 22 1313-13-1-01-002 Lorence, Susan D. Longmont, CO 80501 Halleck, Michael E. & Sandra S. 5704 Weld Co. Rd. 22 1313-13-1-01-003 Longmont, CO 80501 Vogt, Curtis & Iris 5818 Weld Co. Rd. 22 1313-13-1-01-004 Longmont, CO 80501 Nelson, Jerry A. Box 116 1313-13-1-01-005 Frederick, CO 80530 Brooker, Kenneth T. & Sandra K. 9943 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-01-014 Longmont, CO 80501 Moore, Gerald W. 9815 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-01-013 Longmont, CO 80501 Veno, John T. & Betty Louise 9783 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-01-009 Longmont, CO 80501 Jeffres, Stephan T. & Michelle A. 9703 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-01-010 Longmont, CO 80501 Kinney, William E. & Mary Jane 9661 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-01-011 Longmont, CO 80501 Paul, Minnette 9501 Weld Co. Rd. 13 1313-13-1-00,002 Longmont, CO 80501 Johnson, George E. & 1318 Longspeak 1313-13-0-00-014 Mae, Elda & Longmont, CO 80501 Niven Family Trust - Clarence E. Niven Trustee Olson, Stanley 4306 Weld Co. Rd. 22 1313-13-0-00-047 Longmont, CO 80501 Johnson, Meredith O. 14491 Weld Co. Rd. 5 1313-13-0-00-012 c/o John Haley Longmont, CO 80501 890743 • LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET ( continued ) NAME ADDRESS. TOWN /CITY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL $TATF AND 7IP CODF IDENTIFICATION # Kugel, Cole& Mildred E. 420 Longview Ct. 1311-18-0-00-001 Longmont, CO 80501 Davis, Rosa E. P.O. Box 63 1311-18-0-00-030 Frederick, CO 80530 Dvorak, Katherine M. & Robert J. 6363 Weld Co. Rd. 20 1311-18-0-00-028 Longmont, CO 80501 Alexander, Robert S. & Donna C. 6077 Weld Co. Rd. 20 1311-18-0-00-004 Longmont, CO 80501 890743 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property LaK[..11,„,3 \/i11aafr , Znc . STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. C+ a� La5kZu YAke-).1 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ) 2'04 , WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: / / - 15 y (,L 1 c l�7ti Notary Pub c 890743 Aitw d;x 1< LAKEVIEW VILLAGE, INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NAMES OF MINERAL OWNERS AND LESSEESOF MINERALS ON OR UNDER THE PROPERTY Lakeview Village, Inc. 5630 W. 71st. Circle Arvada, CO 80003 890743 Aktw4\x 1ft 4/25/89 To whom it may concern; My name is Pat Stanley. I live on a "water ski lake" in Boulder county. It's located north of Boulder about 2 miles, tucked in the foothills. I myself do not own a boat or do any waterskiing, nor does my family. We enjoy other outdoor activities, and love Colorado. One of the reasons we chose to live in our present house is to get outside of the city, and away from the hustle and bustle of life with neighbors on all sides, etc. The boats that operate on the lake by our house are very quiet. We live within 300 feet of the water, and even so the boat noise does not disturb us. The tournament waterski boats used by the group are muffled through the water, and aren't the loud type seen on many public reservoirs. The cars on the road by our house make as much noise, or more. On Sundays I will sometimes sleep in in the morning. I have never been awakened early by the ski boats. The group on the adjacent lake is courteous. I find it no problem whatsoever to live adjacent to them and the waterski activity. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. My home number is 444-4117. Regards, , , X t � Pat' Stanley Longmont, CO. 890743 M A'y 8, 1989 TO WHOM I . MAY CONCERN: We have lived and raised our family in Gaynor- Lake Subdivision located 2 miles south of Longmont for over 11 years. Our home is located approximately 150 feet from the edge of Gaynor Lake. Though we have never been involved in competitive-style watersk:i i nq nor are we currently involved in boating or skiing, we have over the years observed others engaged in this sport. Noise from the competition, boats has never been a problem at all . We have been able to sleep in at will without being disturbed by the operation of these boats. We have (also been able to have -family gatherings in the back yard by the lake without any adverse d i.shurbance to these activities. Property values throughout the subcl_ vision for those adl iacent:. to the lake and those across the road from the lake are higher than they would be for the same properties without the lake. There are many families in the subdivision who use the lake as well as a number of families who do not. There:: are many positive aspects that add to the quality of life living next to Gaynor Lake. Si.nc ere].y„ Larry Green 10552 Mooring Road Longmont, CO 80 501 890743 e x-55 3 2 LJeG,(. C e a� /O pi 474 Cu. Po-coy Hello