HomeMy WebLinkAbout861164.tiff o...;ZtZ,I ....- ,m.am..aa..,..a - -_ mJ �a.eme.__ — —
41
at FTP--1 / ' ,
/ iiiA a 4:M... ; E T
/ i ii. ...._.... .. , -. .
0 G°' 4., j:-4-0"si !'{J n_ a .4.,. ,c?Q • &t.. �//t7- t-.. 1� I iil® • " "
_E :;rJs
_\\ 4
USR-764'86'45 s
Lip L7 e rT//:r— it. - �.� ;a.W-, �" ,,,,,,.;,.2:1' I 6
.. pcA I'\, I7,r ,1 e°`-- _ .I •
iii
:fie
/ F33I `•4
Il) -- nil-1:M l i • a.,1--
j g
�' a leaGNO
a�MT
_� �-i a &w.W I...,1, tee-- - '� 1 '.j __.. LSD®®_09cl
...."®....� ...._...,.." - PLOT PLAN I
,. MONFOCT CORD O - 9 O
...........mm r nmu"a f'{'''''''''''' e;:iii#• .-FbZ USG 6Y 5FEClAL KENCW<WLICATICN— • i U .
rm
..... ... e 'ls,,./rl .—.. r micas
d. .... qualm�,=u':•v..n_._ ,__•_ Pale, I 'tiro' eTM /'VI...,'. �/�� _._�..._.r.. $•
•
„C.J_ � .. ..�.:: �•E� Nl•�, _ udINITY MAP { `
�.Fanny ,.�, :r
.Ill...,.....,Vg:t.....m...,a....,, ...,_......_...
N
74
r. vu / I 11W gig
/. i., r , 4 _ i
I i A ;4 /77 1
0 i_, _
7--- -- . / i V .,
/ 1
j N -.1
.a \ /a I
//
.
I - c $
I 7 •Pr-- - 4 N o `■ .�d
ii
s
=F i
i,tp p
USR-7648645 a N
10
RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE
ESTABLISHMENT (EXPANSION OF CORPORATE COMPLEX) - MONFORT OF
COLORADO
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public
hearing on the 10th day of December, 1986 , at the hour of 2:00
p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the
application of Monfort of Colorado, P.O. Box G, Greeley, Colorado
80632, for a Use by Special Review for an agricultural service
establishment, expansion of the corporate complex, on the
following described real estate, to-wit:
Part of the NWT and part of the NE4, Section
30, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
WHEREAS, Section 24 . 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request
of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County
Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented
in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this
request shall be approved for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the
application requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance.
2 . It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section
24.4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
861164
Page 2
RE: USR - MONFORT OF COLORADO
a . The proposal is consistent with the intent of the
Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan encourages the development of agribusiness and
agriculturally oriented industry provided these
enterprises do not adversely affect the local
economy or environment.
b. The proposed use is a support facility for an
agricultural activity and is , therefore, consistent
with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District.
c. The City of Greeley' s Planning Commission has
reviewed this request and recommends approval.
d. The site is not located in a Flood Overlay District
or Geological Hazard Overlay District.
e. Use by Special Review Development Standards will
provide adequate protection of the health, safety
and welfare of the neighborhood and County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a
Use by Special Review for an agricultural service establishment
(expansion of the corporate complex) on the hereinabove described
parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following
conditions:
1 . The attached Development Standards for the Use by
Special Review permit be adopted and placed on the Use
by Special Review plat prior to recording the plat.
2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur nor
shall any building or electrical permits be issued on
the property until the Use by Special Review plat has
been delivered to the Department of Planning Services
Office and the plat is ready to be recorded in the
office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
861164
Page 3
RE: USR - MONFORT OF COLORADO
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded , adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of
December, A.D. , 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST 4444/A WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board J cqu 'n s , C airman
/
BY:-.,.._ cntl)c G4"c-n,^' Go -Tem
Dep ty County C eiqc
APPROVED TO FORM: en R. Brant r
-C:142/irbi-
FrE k r
County Attorney
861164
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764 :86 : 45
1 . The Use by Special Review permit is for an agricultural
service establishment (expansion of the corporate complex) as
submitted in the application materials on file in the
Department of Planning Services and subject to the
Development Standards stated herein .
2 . The septic system for the laboratory facility shall meet all
Weld County Health Department regulations.
3 . All construction done on the property shall be in accordance
with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code
Ordinance.
4 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with the Design Standards of Section 24. 5 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
5. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 . 6 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
6. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld
County Department of Planning Services shall be granted
access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to
insure the activities carried out on the property comply with
the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable
Weld County Regulations.
7. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans
shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all
applicable Weld County Regulations . Any material deviations
from the plans or Standards as shown or stated shall require
the approval of an amendment of the permit by the Weld County
Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners
before such changes from the plans or Standards are
permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of
the Department of Planning Services.
8 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with all of the foregoing Standards . Noncompliance
with any of the foregoing Standards may be reason for
revocation of the permit by the Board of County
Commissioners.
861164
HEARING CERTIFICATION
IDOCKET NO. 86-72
-RE: USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT
(EXPANSION OF CORPORATE COMPLEX) - MONFORT OF COLORADO
-A public hearing was conducted on December 10, 1986, at 2:00 P.M., with
the following present:
Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Chairman
-Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Pro-Tem
Commissioner Gene Brantner
Commissioner C.W. Kirby
Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff
Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison
Planning Department representative, Keith Schuett
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 17, 1986, and
-duly published November 27, 1986, in the Johnstown Breeze, a public
hearing was conducted to consider a Use by Special Review for an
agricultural service establishment, expansion of corporate complex, as
requested by Monfort of Colorado. Lee Morrison, Assistant County
Attorney, made this matter of record. Keith Schuett, Planning
Department representative, read the favorable recommendation of the
Planning Commission, which is subject to two Conditions and eight
Development Standards, into the record. Kay Norton, attorney
representing the applicant, presented information concerning this
request. No public testimony was offered. Commissioner Lacy moved to
approve the Use by Special Review for an agricultural service
establishment, subject to the recommendation of the Planning
Commission. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Yamaguchi and
carried unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 15th day of December, 1986.
APPROVED:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST:inelL4444Stani WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder • . _ _;„ .`� �����.�
and Clerk to the Board-\ J:cque ne .h.s.n, Chairman
7/
? - 1 t a
County ClecY� G. '"'"'iy ac ro-
Gene R. Bran
,01
C7i/ rby
�'% / //ni '
Frank Yamagu 6
TAPE #86-81
DOCKET #86-72 -
PL0093
/71, v1)
•
A T T E N >) A N C E R L C O R D
TODAY ' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : DECEMBER 10, 1986
_DOCKET # 86-71 - FINAL APPORTIONMENT - -ANTELOPE HILLS LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
DOCKET # 86-72 - DSR,AGRICULTURAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT - MONFORT OF COLORADO
DOCKET #
•
PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address 2nd the DOC # (as listed
above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. -
NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING
i:_ 7Kc IVOrFon -- 2. v, Sax G 6 reelat4 Lo . 3(A)--
•
•
-
N 9T ICE
Pursuant to the oning laws of the State o₹ Colorado and the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance, a-public hearing will be held in the Chamber-s of the Board
of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 10th _Street, First Floor, _Greeley, Colorado, at the time
specified. All persons in eny -manner interested in the Use by Special
Review ere requested to attend and may to heard.
Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court
reporter to make -a record -of the proceedings, in addition to the taped
record -which will be kept during the nearing, the Clerk to the Board's
Office can be contacted for a list of _court -reporters in the area. If a
court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised
in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost
of engaging a court reporter -shall be borne by the requesting party.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so _certified by the Weld County
Planning Commission may be examined in the office o₹ the Clerk to the Board
of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 913
10th Street, Third floor, Greeley, Colorado.
APPLICANT
_DOCKET NO. 86-72 Monfort o₹ Colorado
P.O. Box G
Greeley, Colorado 80632
DATE: December 10, 1986
TIME: 2:-00 P.M.
-REQUEST: Use by Special Review - -Agricultural service establishment
(expansion of corporate complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWi and part of the NE} of Section 30,
Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy
DAT-ED: November 17, 1986
PUBLISHED: November 27, 1986, in the Johnstown Breeze
AFFIDAVIT-OF PUBLICATION
THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE
STATE OF COLORADO 1
i ss
COUNTY OF WELD 9
I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I
COW Couny Planning Commis- am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze;
pe lxaralnes m tea that the same is a weekly newspaper
mr, 1 10theme located printed, in whole or in part, and published
Weld Dou_a Centennial in the County of Weld, State of Colorado,
-- r, 816 ,toIWtree4-Ttdtd..
Roy; Greeley, Coloreds,.- and has a general circulation therein; that
-mSET NO. 6672 said newspaper has been published
APPLICANT
Monfort a o continuously and uninterruptedly in said
PD. Box G County of Weld for a period of more than
Greeley,-.riolorado 80632 fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the
:Jaecember 10, 1988 , first publication of the annexed legal notice
2:00 P.M.. or advertisement; that said newspaper has
r UEST: Use by Spaei& been admitted to the United States mails as
w — -Agricultural,service second-class matter under the provisions of
Iiste coniPlexl�neion of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any
I. DESDRlIPION:Part of amendments thereof, and that said
NOTICE WY.and pert of the NEV.of newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly
ion 0,Township North:
Pursuant to the zoning laws of a 65 West of the 8th P.M, _qualified for publishing legal notices and
the state of Colorado and the county. Colorado advertisements within the meaning of the
-Weld.Cpunry zonfhns Ordinance, BOARD OF'COUNTY laws of the State of Colorado.
utlft pC Asadng writ be helC.In DOMMISSIONERS r.
qr mTle t the WBof WELD COUNTY, That the annexed legal notice or advertise-
-meet was published in the regular and
County, Colorado, wend count
Centennial Center, 4)15 10th BY; MARY ANN entire issue of every number of said weekly
Streit -Flat- Floor, Sireefey, '.r,' FEUERSTEIN newspaperfor the period of /... consecu-
Ooforad4 Ollie--.thee specified' COUNTY CLERK AND
All persons in any manner RECORDER AND live insertions; and that the first
interested In the Use b Special TO THE BOARD
Review are requested to attend publication of said notice was isthe issue nl
and may be Maid-» •"^. BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy. Sold newspaper dated/vs." Al). pat,
Should the aPpliant or any TED: November 17,1986 and that the last publication of said notice
interested party desire. the was in the issue of said newspaper dated
make kflnce of a court. reporter d- • ,�yBUSHED. November 27,
4 record d the proceed- t tY.,6 in the Johnstown Breeze A.D. 19
record
in which
will to the taped 9�
Theo d which during In witness whereof I have hereunto set
the dsaOffi the n Clerk t the my hand lliis 2 6 (lay' of .,0770 k"
• Board's Office can reporters contacted .,, b
fora list of docrt rt reporter
in the , A.D. 19.Q...
area. a court rthe Bor 's _
obtained,fishall the Clerk is the Board's y
ofsu shall be advised fien days
odor to he h at twat five days s /
prior to engaging a hearing The cost of %7
be br by ne courttequest reporter y ar,". • Publisher
93E IT-ALSO KNOWN that the - --- /
text and macs so certified'fififiy the
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
i Notary Public in and for tlnP C inty of
* W Id, State of Colorq p, this .lsL.... day of
J-/ A.D. 19 I.- �j 1
.1C)-4Lb‘- ., '4-fi. ttrt
J Jilt �v r 11 IN,1 0$31Oy Public
lt
\
My commission expires
i9
Arridavit of Publication
STATE OF COLORADO
a ss.
M�bOayMeWeld County of Weld,
��BRYeE wa I Set:nr,
Cal0MEo, Wald C en Centennial ; 15 10th Street, First
Floor irseley,Colorae0.yt th.,b All persons in any
manner Inserseted In the Use M'f le. are requested le
altnitl.ne may l»heerd. , •° I, Betty J. Poppe of
Sh tP the 4nt or n y�Dr•the PresenCt
arr r1BTit1t�p� theheal I Inaedmon said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I -am
tO the taped .Ca d c ya Mg the hearing,the Clerk
Tons Bares taclste.canwasinta n ,ClI Month! b.
an advertising clerk of
the area.E a OWN MFeripramMelneaS crierI�totter board•:Of-
flee
wll0aawl.dln 0 etMontR!Qb. p for THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and
btM MarNlg.The CON court repMro, W.Sonls
0.1171"Natitq PN1Y, aq{dnd-and meluw cedified It the THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN
BE IT-ALSO KNOWN
Weld CWMy Planning rWexMdnW In the offNeof
E1.CiancrolM Bo.rdBT GaneN Alealo'hera,Iotabtlmrn.Weld that the same is -a daily newspaper general
"Cpuroy Centennial 15 ro111 Street.Third WOr,Lreeley, of
Nlor NO.e6-JY - APPLIC-ANT circulation and printed and published in the City of
o Monfort of Colorado Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or
-P.O.BoxG
Greeley,Cared.S063.2 advertisement, of which the annexed is a true co has
DATE:DeCeMber lg,iN6 copy,
TIME:2:60P.M. been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive
REQUEST: Use My Asocial Review - Agricultural service
eetaafithm.M(expansionist corporaseBNn1P(eq (days)
LEQ L DESCRIPTION:Part of Me RWra and partaf the NEV of Y ) VCh9iPa�; that the notice was published in the
Section 30,TOWMMp 6 North,Range 65 West Of the 6th P.M.,Weld regular and entire issue of every number of said
-Comfy.Colorado g
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS newspaper during the period and time nfpublication of
NEW COUNTYJJYOLORADO
BY:MARY ANNI•EUERRTEINR said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a
tIDE•t " fit 7 Too:Il ac 541,e oARD supplement thereof; that the first publication of said
• r � I Dputy
t: notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper
bearing date
Twenty—seventh
day of November A.D. 19 86
and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said
newspaper bearing date the
Twenty-seventh
day of November A.D. 19 8b
that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley
Republican, has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly during the _period of at least six
months next prior to the first issue thereof contained
said notice Dradvertisement above referred to;that said
newspaper has been admitted to the United States
mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the
Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and
that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified
for publishing legal notices and advertisements within
the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado.
Novemher 27, 198-6
Tot-al char e; $2b.21h
i
tut°t /
Advertising Clerk
-Sub,scrtbed and sworn to before me this
i- day of November AD. 19 86
,1 MY omfn;�lA �C tmgssicn „Ej PJrt4,•3a x 74, 1990
Notar Public
DATE: November 17, 19-86
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
Weld County, Colorado
FROM: Clerk to the Board Office
Commissioners:
If you have no objections , we have tentatively set the
following hearing for the 10th day of December, 1986 , at 2: 0-0 P.M.
Docket No. 86-72 - USR, Agricultural service establishment
(expansion of corporate complex) - Monfort of Colorado
OFFICE OF THE CLE TO THE BOARD
BY: ,? ;% l Deputy
The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be schedule-d
on the agenda as stated above.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 6
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked that reading of -the -st-aff's recommendations and
conditions the dispensed with and that they be filed with the summary as a
permanent -record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Ann Garrison-moved Lase Number -S-264:86:9 for Martin and Wilma U. Oase for a
subdivision -preliminary plan be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based
on the fact that the Weld County Lomprehensivs Plan has suggested that the
best kind of economic growth is economic growth that border-s current cities
or towns and this particular -subdivision -would not border any city or town.
Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The -Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commissi-on. _Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
commission for their decision. Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Lynn -Brown - Yes, and in
addition to she reasons 'cited, she has a great deal of 'concern about the
proliferation of additional septic systems in an area like this. 1.eAnn
Reid - Yes; Ivan Cosnell — Yes; Louis Rademacher - Yes; Paulette
Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes; .rack Holman - Yes, for all of the -reasons
already stated. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR-754:86:45
qtr/ APPLICANT: Monfort -0f Color-ado
REQUEST: Use 1:y -Special Review permit for an agricultural -service
establishment (expansion of corporate complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW -and part of the NEl of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the bth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: approximately .5 mile north of Greeley City Limits; north of Weld
County Road 64 and west of U.S. Highway 85
APPEARANC-E:
Kay Norton, Associate General Counsel, Monfort of -Colorado, seprecented the
applicants. -This is Monfort's Corporate Headquarters and has previously
been a nonconforming use. Any -expansion of -a -nonconforming use requires a
Use by Special -Review permit to be taken out and that is why they are -here.
The expansion is less than ten percent of their space and swill include four
new employees. This will be used primarily -by computer services. The
building is nearly completed. They applied for the building permit and -were
told they
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
November 4, 1986
Page 7
needed a Use by Special Review. The County Commissioners gave them
permission to start this expansion at their own risk. If this request were
to be denied, all construction would have to be removed at their own
expense. They are also increasing the size of their laboratory and this
will also employee approximately four additional people.
Wes Potter reported this septic system is more than adequate to handle the
expansion. Also, their people are aware and comply with disposal of
laboratory wastes.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked if they had reviewed the staff's recommendations,
conditions, and development standards. They have and have no objections to
them.
The Chairman asked that reading of the recommendations, conditions, and
development standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services
staff be dispensed with and that they be filed with the summary as a
permanent record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Paulette Weaver moved Case Number USR-764:86:45 for Monfort of Colorado for
a Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service establishment,
expansion of their corporate complex, be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval
based upon the recommendations, conditions, and development standards as
outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony
heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by LeAnn
Reid.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
commission for their decision. Lydia -Dunbar - Yea; Lynn -Brown - Yes; LeAnn
Reid - Yes; Ivan Gosnell - Yes; Louis Rademacher - Yes; -Paulette
Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes. Motion carried
unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: Pine Lake Sanitation District Service Plan
APPLICANT: Thomas E. Hellerich
REQUEST: To' review a service plan pursuant to Section 32-1-201 et seq.
C.R.S. for a proposed sanitation district
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 17, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado
LOCATION: South of Highway 14 and west of Highway 257
PC.,
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Paulette Weaver that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld -
County Planning Commission that the application for:
C..
CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:45 NOV
7 igq6
NAME: Monfort of Colorado e,-„_ n25
pm
ADDRESS: P.O. Box G, Greeley, CO 80632
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of the corporate complex) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWi and part of the NEl of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile north of Greeley city limits; north of Weld
County Road 64 and west of United States Highway 85.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the
following reasons:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application
requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the
applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
- The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages the development of agribusiness and
agriculturally oriented industry provided these
enterprises do not adversely affect the local economy or
environment.
- The proposed use is a support facility for an
agricultural activity and is, therefore, consistent with
the intent of the Agricultural Zone district.
- The City of Greeley's Planning Commission has reviewed
this request and recommends approval.
- The site is not located in a Flood Overlay District, or
Geological Hazard Overlay District.
- Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide
adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of
the neighborhood and County.
1 x/re 4'1i I . .•
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
Page 2
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon
the following:
1. The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special Review
permit be adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat
prior to recording the plat.
2. The Use by Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any
building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the
Use by Special Review plat has been delivered to the Department of
Planning Services' office and the plat is ready to be recorded in
the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Lydia Dunbar
Lynn Brown
LeAnn Reid
Ivan Gosnell
Louis Rademacher
Paulette Weaver
Ann Garrison
Jack Holman
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a
certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of
County Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution
is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld
County, Colorado, adopted on November 4, 1986 and recorded in Book No.
X of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission.
Dated the 5th day of November, 1986.
(-,t6
Bobbie Good
Secretary
Additional Comments
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
The West Greeley Soil Conservation Service will review this request at
its meeting on November 10, 1986.
The Use by Special Review site is located in the Transitional Zone of
the Greeley-Weld County Airport Overlay District in which structures
cannot exceed 5,200 feet.
..'
INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION
Case Number us,C 7 I/ .f/ . `/S -Submitted or Prepared
Prior
to Hearing At Hearing
1. Application / 7 Pages
J?.. /4 Application plat(s) 2,page(s)
3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet
4. DPS Recommendation
5. DPS Surrounding Propery -Cuner Mailing List
6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List
7. 3 DPS Naps Prepared by Planning Technician
8. DPS Notice of Hearing
9. DPS Case Summary Sheet
10. DPS Field Check ,- / r
4itel
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
_I hereby certify that the // items identified herein were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or pricr to the scheduled Planning Commission
hearing. I further certif tat these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the g(_Board's office on 11f7 p 19g(2.
a./.4t p� d101n.c'
Current Plannet
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF WELD
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN -I0 BEFORE ME THIS % DAY OF c; a �� 19 3S
SEAL
cam, Ty�e e-• c,
NOTARY PUBLIC i
My Commission 1'xpires Feb: Ile WM
WI COMMISSION EXPIRES
7/517
/ 1 e? EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL -SHEET
Case Cam/ 5 //te -e-
Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description
°
A. irrrx+� o /�� ✓ 'ice h" .9Y / 44r..r� .k°lic.CZi
/21
/F3
B. J" a� r !/�;r9
C• 7_ 1O9�I3G1p 17.-772Zrr-4,9r., /!? Q/ / d /J7.--7-2 mil' i
/7 PLCrlac/ �'r=.c""/r� .ei?,7ty,
1/7 E. &d A . / 74 ,t) 7 -
F.
G.
H.
I.
7.
R.
L.
M.
N.
0.
Date: November 4, 1986
CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:43
NAME: Monfort of Colorado
ADDRESS: P.O. Box G, Greeley, CO 80632
REQUEST: Use by Special Review -permit for an -agricultural service
establishment (expansion of the corporate complex) .
LEGAL DE-SORIPTION: Part of the NW} ant -part z,f the NEL of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld Lounty, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .5 -mile north -of Greeley city limits; north 'f Weld
County Road 64 andwest of United States -Highway 85.
THE DEPARTMENT OF FLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING -REASONS:
1. The submitted -materials are in compliance -with application
requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. It is the opinion -of the Department of F lannitg Services staff
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
- The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages the development of agribusiness -and
agriculturally oriented industry provided these
enterprises do not adversely affect the local economy or
environment.
- The proposed use is a support facility f or an
agricultural activity and is, therefore, consistent with
the intent of the Agricultural Zone -district.
- The City of Greeley's Planning Commission has reviewed
this request and recommends approval.
- The site is not located in a Flood Overlay District, or
Geological Hazard Overlay District.
- Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide
adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of
the neighborhood and Lounty.
This -recommendation is based, in Tart, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral -entities which have reviewed this request.
Monfort of -Colorado
USR-764:86:45
Page 2
The Department :f Planning Services staff -recommendation fur -approval is
conditional upon the following:
1. The attached Development -Standards bor She Use by -Special Review
permit be -adopted and placed on the Use by Special Review plat
prior So recording the _plat.
2. The Use by Special Review activity shall -not occur nor shall any
building ur electrical permits be i-asued on the property until the
Use by especial Review {plat has been delivered to the Department of
Planning Services' office and the plat is ready to be recorded in
the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
1. The Use by Special Review permit is for an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of the corporate -complex) as submitted in the
application materials on file in she Department of Planning Services
and subject to the Development Standards stated -hereon.
2. The -septic system for the laboratory facility shall meet all Weld
County Health Department-regulations.
3. All Construction done on the property shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
4. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with
the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
5. The _property owner or operator shall be -responsible for complying with
the _Operation Standards of Section 24.6 -of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
6. Personnel from the Weld County -Health Department and Weld County
Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the
property at any reasonable time in order to insure the activities
carried out -0n the property comply with the Development Standards
stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations.
7. The Use thy Special Review area shall be limited to the -plans shown
hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld
County Regulations. any -material deviations from the plans or
Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment
of the Permit by the Weld -County Planning S.ommission and the -Board of
County -Commissioners before such _changes from the Mans sr Standards
are -permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the
Department -0f Planning Services.
8. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with
all of the foregoing Standards. Noncompliance with any of the
foregoing Standards may be reason Ion revocation -0f the Permit by the
Board of County Commissioners.
Additional Comments
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
The West Greeley Soil Conservation Service will review this request at its
meeting on November 10, 1986.
The Use by Special Review site is located in the Transitional Zone of the
Greeley-Weld County Airport Overlay District in which structures cannot
exceed 5,200 feet.
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: October 28, 1986
CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:45
NAME: Monfort of Colorado
ADDRESS: P.O. Box G, Greeley, CO 80632
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of a corporate complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} and part _of the NE} of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the bth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile north of Greeley City Limits; north of -Weld
County Road 64 and west of U.S. Highway 85
SIZE OF PARCEL: 3 acres, more or less
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
This Use by Special Review permit application ifs for the two sites with
circles around them as indicated on the vicinity map. The applicant _does
not wish to _include the wholecomplex at this time.
The Department of Tlanning Services has received a specific recommendation
from the Weld County Health Department.
The staff has not received referral responses from the following agencies:
- Weld County -Engineering Department
- West Greeley Soil Conservation Service
- Eaton Fire Protection District
The staff has not received any -opposition 'from surrounding property owners.
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: USR-764:86:45 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 24, 1986
NAME: Monfort of Colorado
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for an agricultural service
establishment (expansion of a corporate -complex)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} and part of the NE} of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile north of the Greeley City Limits; north of
Weld County Road 64 and west of U.S. Highway 85
LAND USE: N Monfort Complex, Weld County Road 66, residence
E Monfort Complex, farmland
S Monfort Complex, farmland
W Monfort Complex, farmland
ZONING: N Agricultural
E Agricultural
S Agricultural
W Agricultural
COMMENTS:
The two Use by Special Review sites are located in Monfort's Office Complex
as indicated on the vicinity map. There are a number of other buildings
located on the site which art not indicated on the vicinity map.
By: katai rh .(.Q 151
Debbie deBesche
Current Planner
/• •i eh it • •!• ,+ . YO � . I ^• i o Cal �x l Q/ i�F — \ .°x_r. '� Ix� 231 24
p 11\ ToL
•
.i • ' • N^ •• X]111�O•179° •`' 1 •. • • • •a I • m I y/ i6 r▪�� 2f\ 0 it
::) 39
ppaa 1 , .p rtsrrA;. _ iu c •;s ao,c wwr • r . `]
J'• I5EVEPek. POP 2 22 --.7,-742.16
0 y . i r [] M I 33 M 34 1 pJ . 32
..�V •.1 . • i "..74; 744.-.1•1u - e '
/II . 8. S N •a._., IITiI{S,�'•h4, ...r-11° — .. o -aT •°�°
, tj M I V ` rosuwe • : :• .• ` .e uH. • tALTC
.[ • 1 .\s x he
Pak
is ono
2 • e•o,• 1 ,. i' .e ,. •° '•
•�„o L ,e• }
� � 4 s t• •.•
• •[•• - - ' ._ - • 1� -_ - ?i .•• `-:. �•° �. yoo..•. sze7ale S. .. •! •• �.I I J'• ..•" • • •� ..,' • • [ .�: ' I ' •1 , 'J elm/I\1`L°jtl•�Jf/. y e y �k�, 'E•• • •
a°PE/• • •.•.I], •`�—:z3z• • .. I •
09'r � • I'e .• Li:.e.r. :. �, \�/frli''I �iV ].x ,
[� • I . •d ea 6s ft'4004,4,, t▪ • l
1
Npx> i. • I )%�.-,_j icsrni"vE .410 ..54 ".• Ind \ ' MM.
••••\•••••••4420.5
.. 1'.• .� . i x r i • y {I} ...,d, �•▪ rM u'1.`94.,e\ I' x� .i • �k� x •co�▪ e Y • • �
,c yy
ti�-a iao�ir� l spar .•[ x] 30
l ,vov aaF2 :1:11).
•I• ���. �. . [[ p?
• •—•••
yr •
:7•ilss I
i 4 t ;• �� , O1 � 1.1 ;1 k�a• _n°
°c e `—.:^h:•-.. `� [y- v I ' ,F�.'SCI . `. �• �[ Z� l ,• ][ p• ]a _
�,R.A E. �y "I} V •° •Ida 3 •
I.
- �
•
•
a " A. i !Cxer•
a w GREEL Y + s
a ,.. tK %---. a q+ 4 ), - �... as�..°. A J
CG I r i ' k di
fl ( /
R
• „pyp•
40 3'4
� •Ery CiT II•B
I^ , i • ' F, /' •
b • ,0 �Ja xa p / ?'
I xa �,d 1e . Pic�j*' i1\ J � I zJ � �y"q Ee ]o • x+
:� 444 °N 55, �.
' First I Correction • \--
Line ��.1 r. NOrf k or? • t�.'-- a yp.1, .<' cOr
46
•[ GREnt, 196. ' ur+u,v u ° 0b' CrfiC �-Aa/ x I•• •
, : , ) •
;] k• `. I aI• , �• ✓ • i0 :gib:,
k.: .i • ,19 • JI.• • • . . : •
•, . . ?•r'� •oe>r. tali '.]I' ..H. .�! Is ii
....f: • . . Y • .. .fl, '• •• � • •: '�n •I • •\G
• K• Q S 125.)
2 • ey :p igf, enr°r I• •� rS T pk. �[' Prc" oc • o y.• p ✓ ra •• I . ] e" ti rte. ra '. • e. • :• /- xi ' • x[• li
• • [. + xj•I m 1 921:._ - i n [ 4;L z,1 'z.• •FF • u E� d n z• k� x • ••� n [• n ,+
i pr�LCBEST•k °i
_/ / i ( ate- .i 0 ]u i'.e 1 �'N1 / � i o° .42�.--�-.. l ' wr� { _ _ _
. . _ .. rte` , - - -
4,76,0 1 z
5760 11 O
I 1' � O 41504
I
34,43___--,�wIn�sb .� L aoao � ( " �I: I ❑Cf!I'�12
—7 55 �a;3• •�� 1 332 _ I.
r '
. GREECEY _ \ \ o _ •-
I v 1 _� > ..JX y • IUhn
4 P,F,X
6,0 b � a5°
j
/ I 3/3
V 5 , II I
v 24_ ' Buell School• o
- .,,430 - 19 �o 8
v "te q �i 1 I 20
�� p• 1 H
clew I A: !jr ! °p
2
aceG�G4 � t •Ale- t� • c 47/JI ENE% -4.- 1.,
lso V/4744'• 4,720 % I : /y///^/ a I
14� - /ill ` 1
1 I'bIo e, "O• 9
29°4 1
µ7Z0 9 I" 4J12
00 / I , , I
Greeley Junction I I �Il
�( I I 1°
u6>O I •I
•
I c II
rner �_ 1 C3.
II . ,_,� • i47� .T ti E - �_ (orncr � �a� _
I •14690 •';id ��+ �,,,7J� - _ _
I
-,
?11( U AL I -
I 1 E‘9 6,h T, t•
• ( y
• li r o A CI'1 _ I�
Tc? � n1 i 1 650
.., ..
•
a 6551 4648 I 4642
( I ---\
/
I �. i
o i �. •
4. 0 rti ^+' v
• I.•
I\
li
' • ���t<E� . I � � rasp
I
I 4690 6/! ■ '6 • I�
•
co� I C. s .12.•
o I" WI II „ �a,
4652
•^a lV,-,:.
r' 7.�Y' ter: t 1 •�� +" At y ,2.:.••• • *� r•
S ar Yf.Y� •;•;.;:.....:1‘,..44.:,:e.•
rte.. , ,t 1 '.•
'r5 • ; y :-. . , . ,, ...t
., i ,). 2'E 4 - .a •• fir .. I { '‘ . ,•Aii, . „,,,,:.„, ,,„. ,•:•,, .i . , . ., '"'�. „w.�� i'
i:.: .. / , • ... .„ ,, _ . „„ , , , , .
111' I r‘: , v,.,�-{(%'..�c - 1 ., S�.t'``F rt �,..s; ... -.........„.
_�1iy.
-, . T a - xL Ja (44
i} T'z.₹ill 1K•
I . .. .,..:vtip, .if l r� --, ...,,. jy• < t. y'-.4 ....., ..,...i.. ..,.. `fr "‘ * tF<
u.F .� __t44.,-.4.-. V ,.. • �' :.;.;.14-J. 't , R.33 1(..Ite.:�$ d ,�i' -int..-
{t r`t "�;t' �r ; '. %y 1' 'l; .ti f c Y .sl�� , a +
'}iftf:t L'• - 1 :y;�,:. - it .,.,.��.,-gym r ;.r -.i •..-"
„ y, ti,+ir,• }.•-,•., i�r.,. /..•.; 1 SW 4 . r:•><7�', { 3 rt t•33- �v
f ) al4.t r . - �__ • •X.. t. •
yi + ,_.'.•,-,„;4'4.1,1iis
• 'Yr "iV (''� '� T s -fir. ' ;...',.:•-F,..
step Tr f+ Irk�t73.
r C ; ' k IyJ * ' >T4AtY
r y9
t
T-'4,,. i1 :gk, '; /St° ' f - ,,.. t ' y 3 t 2£
Pm`.f s .r. :4:7
• t t F_,a�i i
y ` 't5t}SriEh yfo • f �(( n t 4 � Sty L
..�,.s t:; • •
• «.r,, s 11', 1' ey Ks-Iw'4.t1_ , „T $ " D.el,id H K .,ski ..4 •,'t bM' y { ,� 4•. 11 :m a. - ••
`nr a,Y'cA• • ^5 �C� Ilt', a + Z;y tAt`h t r ��
3 �Y � 4 jn{; r4z s �
t � it
s}jr , • +• * �' '�: • • ' if ^+ t .. mE,t 7,
-k;...• -*' . ••?•• ,'61.i•-• • 'v •• •-. r.- 1 • 1 •-•; .i.. '.:7••""7.°1-'•.-ift'3'7.:.,.1,,Y.::i... ',p
• •>t Vic- t<T r` a• _ __-�. ._. ..�.'.. •w.r•,« A .r r t;i S r ,. k
.. •,,,,;;;,,,,,,,-, r';•1. •
Tf„. ft.17,c1-1.-• '• __ ......_ 0J' .• '.1:.r`s, a(+r R`.hl..7: ; -• `t `x•i,1,-i.,,,,,,,,,,,-4,,,,,t"'a ti r1u-' fi 6, � ...i.. .•.t<.ii .ems' . '7 '4 ?it " fjltt,�y�'•}
t •.c,:
1 � r1•• .�• - � is .}
'•..T",.: '� '1 J.'-7y.`f "F.v{,`��.j('rt F•4 {Y,�.,R :i`:,,-....,-,4,11:-_-...:.,,,,;,.i�`',Ny}{�',{
7'm P •i 4•11::.,;4 . I` /� _.st.. .... ...,.a_. ��} �. c ^f' rh 2 Fri;
`, ••�. I
..� •
9T • 1 ' R+� ...0a .r ips •i'•� ' ( Si 'I (..t.' •1 " i
•m • ,'4„. to E '7t't n * K• i
« '._:..1 .• —s - - •fir.. :'� q .: _ • • ";../.14.-1'7.. .r... ,✓••
el
� m 1 «� sue. ,�1( 1._,.-.., -`�,i 1,+.� '..L...,.... •'Y •-'• • 1�, '��' �1.j.'+-�•,} -,' •• #( 1 •`t# 1 S�.'.'ZF•`�
'a•�m •ow •V. • S - ' !: � i�•I .'Y 1'+ ',`.iy.Y91 A•{ 1„•;,:'.;'_'.*; 1f' .• •� .' ,::•;;;;A_s',•,"-Zi
i i••- • - • �. .
I 1 .r jlll7� --}�' •� rev.••: W j • ,•1 1 • �''v'; ,,,.......4''''&.-... ,..," ,t.r `:r!
' A.• •
�4, .' m - 1'1,to- 'j! t.' , • •.� •.4,-;:'•'yr. ,'4.-C • 't.• ,t•' 3'+. _� ..''.,,-F't'T•7 -,
t , 3 ,�. . • t 4 • :2. ;p r �j -.— it}L 41r c.,• l'•p. . � j �m''y'' ,..
. •• � .j. ••� - � 4 �"I • ;`� ,-' r.1S'•t •- . "•fir , '••••I� kY• Y' �. F C •
1 • •• . : 2,1 • .'. ..4s..,
` t1 w•A'# i.'...• ."-.1.•';*l •.; + ♦ , •• ••ate -N• ti,.i '7..5'4 x
• • 0 i CSC/ .. • 3 -- M •t•.•~ 1`f'•t •,�•� ( • .-i •.wS:l.-#}.i a.r •.ilk -t,b.•.•♦�:�,.• 4.•• � 7•; •.� ♦. y t is R, • r. a j�� ;a'1f.a .m.w:•e•� i .., i � ,t �hY�� J;.
5 Y _ ' . ..__._ ....�_ _. �•' • 4- .v ,v.,;• k• ••1!. 'II.• • • I t'•• I a, —._T A:4-•„-•a';•f•I•3•4•.+rl,'.�
• -
1 • .'.* .• t 4.•,'.,y « s '.•» :.>••.i' j ..•• 4.:.... • r —P Y' is3�W� 1'Z'� ? yr:
�t •r . ..# *, • -0 , .tom • -a! i •_,r • i 1 • b.. •••.'i.j `•,'K�.ii� .'.1b T *. •.! :•m_• 'r.-•`t• '= { I � **•"..- '4
•-•71 - .1 • i ti,....... .4 ...- .,..-.) -'..... it , •44-. r. ; it."' ti• ;•(t• t '• t �1' iI A i "Ji�^�'�? t 'i.
_._....:t I• -i • { .._. .. r Y_t•
'I: �.• •
7 •r.._..t Yq-rv-:,Ya-- .. .,.. `..
,."� 0 .:+r 1 iii,. •r _ --'� ,tiri.w;... ..... i '. ! £
•• • '.-. t ♦ i ♦•� _ 8 '*,' .t i •..• .{,. •. ' t••'.< '�'::.''.i't ' ''":• -i rifi• :e•SP . • *.i ' . .. • :',4, — • �y t = {— '` .,. to
E ORAf DUB
IWeldaTo County Planning Date October 24, 1986
COLORADO From Health Protection Services
subje«� Case Number: USR-764:86:45 Name: Kay Norton/Monfort of
Colorado
Health Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. An ISDS Evaluation will be necessary prior to issuing the
required septic permit on the laboratory system.
2. Recommends approval of the office addition part of this
proposal.
By Direction of Ralph R. Wooley, M.D.
o I-a 4aIt1t
1986 N.
lei Ca. Planning IMBIBSSIam
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: Kay Norton/Monfort of Colorado CASE NUMBER: USR-764:86:45
SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 27, 1986
NO .SR NR
NO SR NR
V
X Weld County Health Dept.
X Engineering Department
X Lynn Brown
1700 Montview Boulevard
Greeley, CO 80631
X State Highway Department
1420 2nd Street
Greeley, CO 80631
X West Greeley Soil Conservation Service
4302 9th Street Road
Greeley, CO 80634
X Eaton Fire Protection District
Attention: Duane Wilson
Route 2, Box 152
Eaton, CO 80615
/ X City of Greeley .,... .— -
c/o Nicholas Matz
Planning Department
919 7th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
NO=No Objection
SR=Specific Recommendations
NR=No Response
Cn.
-
r DEPAR-I ..TENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
(Gt; PHONE(303)3564000 EXT. 4400
915 10th STREET
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on
November 4, 1986 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Use by
Special Review permit for a Agricultural Service Establishment (corporate
complex) from Monfort of Colorado the parcel of land is described as part of
the NW} and part of the NE} of Section 30, T6N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado, containing 3 acres, more or less. The property is located
approximately } mile north of Greeley City Limits, north of Weld County Road
64, and west of Highway 85.
The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the
• consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld
County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related
to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley,
• Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing
on November 4, 1986 .
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the
Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center,
915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400.
Jack Holman, Chairman
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Johnstown Breeze
To be published one (1) time by October 23, 1986
Received by: '6•lA .
( ���ti,
Date: ° /0 /: p /et
.-__..
�\I
it i995
Weld Cu. Planning i;nmmissiuu
,e--' , \ DEPART(\. =NT OF PLANNING SERVICES
K xs 7, PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400
�k \ 10th STREET
t 1 .uer,
\ GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
e
f p (• <<c_r k.� 5 ij•.
h
COLORADO
October 15, 1986
TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Case Number: USR-764:86:45
There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on
Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing
Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley,
Colorado concerning the request of:
NAME: Kay Norton/Monfort of Colorado
FOR: Use by Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment
(corporate complex) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the DWI and part of the NE} of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the tth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately } mile north of Greeley city limits, north of Weld
County Road 64, and west of Highway 85.
Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property on which
this request has been made. For additional information write or telephone
Debbie L. deBesche, Current Planner.
WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
915 10th Street - Room 342
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone: 356-4000 - Extension 4400
MAILING LIST
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
Mary G. Gibbs
1711 AA Street
Greeley, CO 80632
Aruthur H. Leaver
c/o Monfort of Colo. , Inc.
P.O. Box G
Greeley, CO 80632
Helen Virginia Hankins
c/o Monfort of Colo. , Inc.
P.O. Box G
Greeley, CO 80631
David P. Kelly, ET.AL
2012 27th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80632
DEPART( €NT OF PLANNING SERVICES
(
q �. PHONE(303)3564000 EXT. 4400
915 10th STREET
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
P1 F Y
O.
COLORADO
October 15, 1986
TO: MINERAL OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERAL OWNERS
Case Number: USR-764:86:45
There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on
November 4, 1986, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room,
First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley,
Colorado concerning the request of:
NAME: Kay Norton/Monfort of Colorado
FOR: Use by Special Review permit for an Agricultural Service Establishment
(corporate complex) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWi and part of the NEk of Section 30, T6N,
R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately } mile north of Greeley city limits, north of Weld
County Road 64, and west of Highway 85.
You have an interest in the mineral rights under the parcel of land being
considered. For additional information write or telephone, Debbie L.
deBesche, Current Planner.
WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
915 10th Street - Room 342
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone: 356-4000 - Extension 4400
MINERAL OWNERS
Monfort of Colorado
USR-764:86:45
Coors Energy Company
P.O. Box 467
Golden, CO 80401
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. -4400
Case Number Date Received
Application Checked by Mylar pint -submitted
Application Fee Receipt Number
Recording Fee _ Receipt Number
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary
signature)
I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld -County
Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning
the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described
unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado:
Ni OF NEi OF NWt
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: OFD NNW OF Section 10
T 6 N, R 65 W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review
Permit is proposed: Section T N, R W
Property Address (if available) 1930 AA STREET, GREELEY 80631
PRESENT ZONE A(AGRICULTURAL) OVERLAY ZONESTRANSITIONAL ZONE OF AIRPORT OVERLAY
TOTAL ACREAGE 0. 1 -AC UNDER THE ADDITIONS: THE TOTAL CORPORATE COMPLEX DISTRICT
PROPOSED LAND USE I . CORPORATE 2. LABORATORY COVERS VARIOUS TARTS OF A 30 AC
EXISTING LAND USE 1. CORPORATE OFFICES 2. LABORATORY PARCEL
SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SHE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT: — — — —
Name: MONFORT OF COLORADO
Address: P.O. BOX C City GREELEY CO Zip 80632
Home Telephone # N/A Business Telephone # 353-2311
Name:
Address: City Zip
Home Telephone /1 Business Telephone B
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) :
Name: KAY NORTON c/o MONFORT OF COLORADO
Address: P.O. BOX G City GREELEY CO Zip 80632
Home Telephone # N/A Business Telephone B 353-2311
List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject
properties of record.
Name: MONFORT OF COLORADO
Address: P.O. BOX G City GREELEY CO Zip
80632
Name: COORS ENERTY CO (LESSEE)
Address: P.O. BOX 467 City GOLDEN CO Zip 80401
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all
statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the
application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
COUNTY OF WELD )
STATE OF COLORADO )
Signature: Ow9O r, Authorized Agent
'Ett�s'crinatd '.and sworn to before me this .,2,3" ay o�' 9l t 19,Q/,.
,11 ,1 `7, 1,z, etXt
rlf
NOTARY PUBLIC
My ermm isSion expires My Commission Expires Aug.1), 1980 `.
C—(t2°
� r PR I i , t '5 J
'I- 1. rs r .`is t� �`,>rya W1' I,�9rt i;4 i4e 4449 se, f �w t '' #' „{ r
I 4. ' ' Y-tyr7S4'�,.'F � max `rs:
at Iv A
` r `°'P �F ii 4 % P oµh v ni f a. '
{F4— 4 i' N'TMy.
,r . ,;y "Syi� 'R^"' s- vrb .uWn...r.�>""m>r^P
ra..�'nv.a'xy — a"-_ m+'�!i".mM' n
7 4
...s^
• ��Y( rµ�.N+.r>•+ d.' .t Ce ... ks 99 3" r e r ...:41'. rt k ri.�' !t K� 9. L
p� a f r I �,u,F 4.--i,-✓r ,P>x;4^Tlk ,q yp P`rJ{ ,"r2.7.1„,„; r‘,4„,„.4,,%,i ,c ; t o-
x• +'+ ' Ty;
1iV7• T i .r<< q ]ti,,' ,a.k" e$" Trams ��{ TtY r" xry'.✓.
ii 4 .:PR P�' 1 _ rt1 '+c. umfwa t'r ^�{d 1�,�y}, e ' i S .
, , I i i Ls �7 T F.4V RRS �Y' 'y� i§ ,ti
'34 S4fs � j I I F i ! xiwr. r� �' X yieep a it E ia•�xdhan
¢� " o i4 ' < s r ..".:7,)(Ii:k,-s'* .c to n �', + 'f .st58' b . X� ST
{9 ''1 f I:� ._w• N s �7', `@ r , a ?� ,,fi .r"'/ a+M' 1-41''Y4 t .'ss; ttn44,9.4'ff 12
r I ;iw �f.ti k a 'b ' z� ��
., = i7 d� �, . .4-
�}
yx
`E �# - reb.4 i� q.d�. .Y •.ae
9 Wr � zK "
*' t TMY7.xi�S
p �M �f 'dl .1
" j I* rt
a�,,y}'.. x y t1iC' `�' g...1-4.4,,,,,,k-,4.-.4..t.: ° .•. "
1.2.5-ti ;-,"2.17-5•
,.4. /1.441,..!44V •Y' s5 -f i
� cj k 2444.4. S l,I x 3 r WY,' -I
' N ,
N Lw"``36,4. rig,-6j,Kl 'S 'H idJ y 4 �'f'—..
p
'_ 3 :h . �. e , t y1 s' : .i 4 '.0 to
::;:
- v. _ a 4 a� 0 , a 1 ° I a
fCla itAt �! '-t t. pa
Orr 4t'¢ t,, ^i" . ,� i e I
j
i
ft 1 - S !`"f ti44, ; o
tF r rh� >e 1 -''' '
,4,,.,,,,,...:.-„,...., "`� fit + ; e }l es
s e Ss "t1' _
'dr nl�i.0 e d n v• Nft 3 R'St " sky-" k - ! x :"F-'n 114
. a r l w 1:44 �� at ` '� ? �aa + r C a•' ' \...,,,, \ 9 y r.c a r i' S� aju i .J
ti°"`£ ,.e 4 to t. e4 "t-� - N \ '.\` .14 <" rt' V r '4 ,;Sr .X d` yi.t t, 9rh I
•
:x. n� ` 2,4,44'6.- •p p. ? µ..ry 4-.ter?), 4' kjr4a •• "d � re-r,114, >
utf n a,.n; +y}s 6y tr v . i+ , .41 , .-
a ..*,F�rG ) k5 yr6� � aa:
''}}iy .�,t y lw i5 r ± f.4, a � F+a+ "0'in so.
� � Y
e s Si4? q
'4�- it s" ' - n 1 `t. k + i. sn
"; y�va S wyI x1, ' w�.t,,pa�'5, i o
X s frt Ms;M ' N`x N__yy / Y '��py',�d m,P ?F .L " ry Y�� ' ' ." '�,.pti Lt,�A 1 � §mot ,,..--'14.--,V,p'" ''
' 4,241.1%.4% 9 ,+'iP +� 1' 31: R x ti 7aY"� { `Yr+.{`Sy t -
vP p
r t . era :. i." �Rot n4 aafi ,•{ .t x .. i
•
w 4 _4 x $ Jta i 0.,7 MY4ii,•141.t4
r yla+� t J >
{$F4,` .. .fit t FI,1'7'hyi tl1 lib
, ,��""''+... .r „
f P , 1'•of MI. P ,41,044 TR '.ya - p
` "{� s ♦ , Ai�� ` ryd. X1, �hG�ia...
oa r. r ff ,�p,,,,.��� NN'[M�.Fe.
t4r rt,SKs1 •?....•
i alg:
b t
x ,�
� :n °A
i C (t r 'F 4 ye n t'
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE
Application No.
Subject Property N1 of NE1 of NW% and NW% of NW% of NE% of Section 30, T6N, R65W
1930 AA Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names
and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under
the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names
appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or
from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney.
A. 6./.40.. A0aatittH
The forego ng instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 02S —
day of / Jc4J , 19��.
WITNESS my ha and official seal.
My Commission expires: L .
6tary Public
NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET
Please print or type
NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION #
MARY G. GIBBS 1711 AA STREET 0803-19-000-007
GREEELY COLORADO 80632
LEAVER, ARTHUR H. C/O MONFORT OF CO. INC. 0803-19-000-008
HANKINS, HELEN VIRGINIA P.O. BOX G
GREELEY COLORADO 80632
KELLY, DAVID P. , ET.AL. 2012 27TH AVE. 0803-19-000-009
GREELEY COLORADO 80632
c"F'
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
SURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject Property N1 of NEB of NWT and NWZ of NWT of NE4 of Sect. 30, T6N, R65W
1930 AA Street, Greeley Colo 80631
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,
addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the
Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within
five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list
was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership
update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such
records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list
compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been
assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date.
Ac
AC9) c
The fo egoing instrument was subset.' ed and sworn to before me this
day of - ti S , 19, 7.
WITNESS el /hand and official seal.
My:ramniisSIbn expires: My Commission Expires Aug. 8, 1988
Jr VA) 1.'� l //fJ
Notary Public
.— Recorded at ) o'clock M.,
• ^ e,- rD 4Th N'7
Reception i,u. Y1z.':....,yrt.0 a ,-. - Recorder. Hi
'[Sry,- 1't1Z7..
STAMI'
THIS DEED, Made this 23rd day of November H t 312 419 j ' ''fl ' ' "' ,a.
•in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and sixty—three a�- f,..' .v 1 i,..„,,_,.------,,C).: ‘.----_,..,-,am-. :„
between WARREN H. MONFORT and LILLIAN EDITH r {J'ws. l yA ra" :
MONFORT of the i I
County of Weld and State S'- ", %t ',l -
of Colorado, of the first part, and MONFORT FEED LOTS, INC. , :: :�≤',,� paean C'
a corporationMrganized and �'> ei n . i, u
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the-State of Colorado Ib4l..kounn 1'c, I w,,ttiai.
of the second part:
L — J
WITNESSETH, That the said-part ies of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
- TEN and other good and valuable consideration DOLLARS,
to the said part ies of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt-whereof is
hereby confessed and acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents-do
grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of thesecond part, its successors and assigns forever,
all of the following-described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying-and being in the
County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: � ���-�,I - -_
i
The West Half (Wz) of the Northeast Quarter (NE-1/4) :j4 ', i 22, .tr�rr },
of Section Thirty (30) , Township -Six (6) North, q , pill' I ,7-,- --"'Ill+,1:4:
Range Sixty—five (65) West of the Sixth Principal d ) „..4 .,
Meridian, together with two shares of the capital I " :4,,
i -
stack of the Windsor -Reservoir And Canal -Company, L_
eight shares of the capital stack of the New Cache --
La -Poudre Irrigating Company And Eight shares of
the capital stock of the Cache La Toudre Reservoir
Company.
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and-appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise
appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders,-rents, issues and profits thereof; and all
the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part ies of the first part, either in law
or equity,of, in and to the above bargained premises,with the-hereditaments and appurtenances.
TO HAV-E AND TO HOLD-the said premises above bargained and-described, with the appurtenances,_unto the
said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. And the said part ies of the first part, for
them selves,th4iN, executors, and-administrators, do covenant, grant, bargain and-agree-to and with
the said party of the second part, its-successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and -delivery of
thesepresents,they ar-e well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure,perfect, absolute and
indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and ha ye good right,full power and lawful authority to
grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from
all former-and other grants, bargains, sales,liens,taxes,assessments and ineumbrances of whatever kind or nature
soever,
•
1
and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceful possession of the said party of the second part, its
successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part
thereof, the said part ies' the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER_DEFEND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said part iesof the first, part have hereunto set their nand S ''--
and seal s the day and year first above written. /f //
Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of I J ! (1 •:]._� I :(�.1. . �.Z`..L CI!.[SEAL]
lW J_ er. r. on fort /
" Z+z �4_B-'t [SEAL]
Lillian Edith""Monfort
[SEAL]
STATE OF COLORADO l
}ss.
County of WELD ))J
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23rd day of November
19 63•by Warren H. Monfort and Lillian Edith Monfort. ,.- �,:
WITNESS my hand and official seal. = ,.% ,.` _
O :^c, y
J, Ira/Ci ,•_
My commission expires / ? ; <?--s,.-. -
,`•. Notary rhbllu.
No. 952 WARRANTY DEED TO CORPORATION— - - '
For Photographic Record. ,
—Bradford-Robinson Printing Company,1824-46 Stout Street,Denver,Colorado
. .I
�;: ;
� c e..L-eszw—,ette;:.. nnat2ai'caieek�s�'�'_S�y..�,�.,xyy r v'Sr_wy,. ,aga*^u' No1N •..", z.
+:ZQiL, Sh '
ff p 1-11k1
Recorded at !•-� ' o'clock 11 M
Reception No .-' t. ' '. - Recorder.
THIS DEED, Made this first day of December
in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and fifty-two
between
GRACE R . TINiJ73
of the
County of Weld and State
of Colorado, of the first part, and MONFORT FEED LOTS, INC. ,
a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado
of the second part:
WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars and other good and valuable considerations 3l!RgiWkk
to the said part y of the first part in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is
hereby confessed and acknowledged, ha 5 granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do OS
grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever :ire, ,1,
all the following described lot or parcel of land, situate,lying and being in the I_- .::,i
County of Weld and State of Colorado,=eat{ and in Northern Colorad ' .,
Water Conservancy District, to-wit: PL
The East Half of the Northwest Quarter (E'cNti J*) of Section Rt' ,.'
Thirty (39) , Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-five (65) West . '
of the Sixth (6th) P.M. , and water for irrigation thereof by "^ "+
eight (8) shares of The New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Company lJ . +U
eight (8) shares the Cache la Poudre Reservoir Company, one (1)
share The Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company, and one (1) lateral 1_'n, ""
right in Carpenter Lateral Company, together with all easements , = f"
rights for carriage of water , and rights-of-waycf every kind used
with said land, and subject to rights-of-way for existing ditches
and public roads . i° n
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise -
appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all
. rvn'-
the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part y of the first part, either in law i��l,en i�.-,.,--
I or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances.
It W, 7
F TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the i . y' '
w 'I •.t said party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. And the said part y of the first part, for •aS I
' d'i her sel f her heirs, executors, and administrators, do es covenant, rant, bargain agree "''_:.
` t p g and to and with
a' the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and-delivery or
("' these presents, she iS well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and II lI
„ ,1 indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to -=
rMili grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid,and that the same are free and clear from - —
—I rrn r ,'!
all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and incumbrances of whatever kind or nature 'iF � i
,ne.i'Hsoever, subject to 1952 taxes which grantor herein assumes and agrees if+ Fsr,
1.491(3)
to pay. R,4 IA
•
03
amarts f r '�l r
e,M, and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable ����, possession of the said party of the second ,art its .,
..�i 1 J nw of I
successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part 1
thereof, the said part y of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. . - --
l c7,
IN WITNESS WHEREON, The said party of the first-part ha S hereunto set her hand - `^•-..
and seal the day and year first above written.
RIP: 4 it
Signed, Scaled and Delivered in the Presence of1 � I al
Grace R Tinker ---[SEAL] t
[SEAL] � ��•�
i [SEAL] FLi_I ' 1nm.en
STATE OF COLORADO, r, e,i , /Y
ss.
County of
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / R •1 ' l r1 gday of December r,. .
19 52, by/ Grace R. Tinker
WITNESS my hand and official seal, �My commission expires :L—H—H- ..4.-T:
My Ccmm•' _,-- ) +. -9 4 \ i O. — '°„Y,'t
N ry Public:" ll� iiilI
No.952. WARRANTY DEED TO CORPORATION—For Photographic Record. r-w
I —The Bradford-Robinson Ptg.Co.,Mfrs.Robinson's Legal Blanks,1846 StoutSt.,Denver,Coln. ,
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED
OPERATION AND USE
This application for a use by special review is for the remodeling
and expansion of existing, non-conforming uses in the A zone which are
part of,the Monfort of _Colorado, Inc. , headquarters. The corporate
headquarters include the former Monfort hare, an office building to the
east (which is the subject of this application) , and various associated
structures of both residential and commercial use. All are located in
and around the former site of the Monfort feedlots north of Greeley.
This application is for a small office addition to the existing
Corporate East Building, and for an addition to the laboratory, a
separate structure.
These additions are required due to an expansion of the corporate
staff and a need for updated laboratory facilities.
I. Office Addition.
The office addition will increase the existing 23,352 square foot
office complex by 9.6%. The addition is for additional data processing
personnel. It will not be visible from any public right of way. The
addition will have a capacity of up to seventeen workers, of which four
will be new positions. Patrons or visitors to the addition will be
minimal. The employees will work a single shift.
The closest residence to the office addition is 200 feet to the
south, and is owned by Monfort. All adjacent properties are in
agricultural use and are owned by Monfort of Colorado.
There will be no animals present in the expansion.
There will be no significant increase in vehicular traffic due to
the addition.
The facility and the expansion are served by North Weld County
Water District. The existing septic system was enlarged at the end of
1985 for an 80 person capacity. The additional four employees will make
a total of approximately 64 workers, which puts the system at 80%
capacity. The existing system is therefore, adequate to serve the
facility with the addition.
The soil conditions on the site are excellent for construction (See
attached SCS aerial photo and soils descriptions) . The land to be
occupied has not been cultivated in many years. The location of the
additions is fixed by the existing facilities.
The negligible additional debris or wastes generated by the
addition will be disposed of in the same fashion as the existing
facility.
The only applicable overlay district is the transitional zone of
the airport overlay district. The office addition is one story high and
therefore complies with the restrictions of that overlay zone.
The facility is served by the Eaton Fire Protection District. A
hydrant is located within fifty (50) feet of the office addition.
The addition does not require storm water detention facilities.
All parking is provided on site. No additional parking will be
required by the addition. No new access will be required.
The proposed additions far exceed the minimum twenty foot setback
and offset standards.
Landscaping of the additions will be consistent with existing
installations, and maintained by an independent contractor.
Monfort will comply with all applicable noise, air quality, water
quality and weed control standards.
Construction commenced on the office addition September 3, 1986.
The Beard of County Commissioners authorized issuance of the permit upon
Monfort's agreement to submit this application and with the
understanding that the Board is not bound to approve this application by
issuance of the building permit. Construction should be complete or
nearly complete by November 15, 1986.
II. Laboratory Addition.
Most of the remarks above concerning the office addition also apply
to the laboratory addition, such as utility service, soils, surrounding
land uses, traffic and visual impacts.
The lab addition is nccded to do all testing and laboratory work
for the Monfort plants in Colorado and Nebraska. This facility will be
built in lieu of constructing a facility in Nebraska.
The nearest residences, which are three Monfort-owned houses, are
250 feet to the north.
There will be one shift of no more than four additional employees.
Capacity of the entire facility will be fifteen employees. There are
virtually no visitors to the facility, and no additional visitors will
be drawn by the addition.
The existing lab has a 2,000 gallon septic facility. The facility
with the proposed expansion will require only a 1500 gallon system,
therefore the sewage disposal system is more than adequate.
A separate 10'x10' storage shed will be constructed for the lab at
the time of the addition so that there will be no outside storage or
stockpiles of materials.
No start date has been determined for this addition Assuming
cooperative weather, construction time should not exceed three months.
III. Compatibility.
This proposal for expansion of Monfort's corporate facilities is
consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The plan encourages
the expansion of agri-business and industry. Monfort's business
includes crop production, cattle feeding, slaughter and distribution.
Industrial business and commercial development is encouraged to locate
near existing towns. Those facilities lie just north of Greeley. The
proposal will not contribute to water, air or surface pollution; nor
will it remove land and water from agricultural production. There are
no dangerous or undesirable building conditions at the site.
The proposal provides for the protection of the health, safety and
welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the county. Neither
addition will be visible fran a public right-of-way. The additions will
generate no noise, heat, dust, odor. They will generate negligible
traffic. Adjacent residences are fairly remote and are owned by the
applicant. Surrounding properties are used for crop production or
Monfort of Colorado business uses (not including any retail activity) .
The area was identified for future industrial development by the City of
Greeley North Greeley Study.
BOARD OF DI ECTORS ° stic NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRIC'
-A E_.HEJOENREICH `,h _
ROBERT AMORE _ HIGHWAY 85 LUCERNE,COLORADO 80848
NARY MMPSON aryl I�
r, S LYLE NELSON,MGR.
•
W.M.MCKAY
P.O.BOX 58 • PHONE 358.3020
September 16, 1986
RE: Water Service : Monfort Corp Office
Dear Sirs, .
This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service
to the following described property:
SE* Sec, 30-665 Meter #803
1. X Water service is presently being provided to the above
described property.
2. X Water service can be made available to the above
described property provided all requirements of the
District are satisfied.
• If contracts have not been consumated with North Weld County Water
District within one year from date of this letter, this letter shall
become null and void.
Additional comments:
•
Sincerely,
' NORTH WELD COUNTY TER DISTRICT
•
••
• Ly 'D. Nelson, Manager
• LDN/wb
i —
Ve
- ry
6.,..H. -'--------- r----".'----
(h
N N
Nco
----_�
i
In 67:
n,
m
�1// O N
m
p
rail
a m N -- ... nG ij. ,,
a m / N n 1 �`
in
_ r m
�f06)
I.
rt
a
r
+ \ 4' I
I o a J' F �+"�' Y r
n /
m m
c (
/N Uo
k.
\
CC
� A r:( ,1i- 5o�'�
M (\:7:
C.
x& < f
a
n a • _N ///�
QN �1 V
a a
�� m i
_ m m it m L.m II I 1-
In m 1.O U Ca
i N J
m n -- J',' ,�lu
�� "'
. ..I ° n. i 3.1t ^.'I UI Al d)11 L1t(E
111 (.UNSE OVA I ION SERVICE 6VELU COUNTY, SOU TFIERI
SOIL LECENO
P,sMBOl NAME SYMBOL NAME
Alvan loam,0 to 1 percent slopes 44 Olney loamy Sand. 1 to 3 percent slopes Cu LTU F
Alt.en loam I to 3 percent slopes I5 Olney loamy send 3 too percent slopes
A.moos aryl&me ts.er000m suostratunl 15 Olney fine sandy laaet u te I pm-pm•entsmoes
Aeuolls o:meets.I Smied CD One foie canny loam I to 3 petu Ines BOUNDARIES
• Aso eon -do':em 1 to 3 percent smoos pd Olney fine soncly Stein 3 to 5 percent slopes
c Asca en smote (sett 3 t a percent 5l 3,23 aY 03auort sni id I)to a rt dent s)apes
Ascaion so arc r' S ty 9 percent ent slopes rt Otero sandy n U tc, 1 percent...toes Nallonal state or p
Ascalon 10am.0 to 1 Fe:cent slopes 51 Oteo same/loans_1 to 3 percent slopes
Ascalon loam 1 to 3 Per,- t soles 52 le en)cane,10.,m 3 et ri percent slepos County or parch
Ctwa•and, l:a:n.L c.9 percent dupe
IP BaeL et l L l to 3 percent Shoes
Rres:e.saso,oyyy; ..)to i stoma slopes atP,11 la,rs a l..1 .t snipes Mulor civil Meissen
12 Gress dli.1 to d percent slopes to l• .an t 1.:3 perte8 51epe:
Reser va!lon (naDc
1) Ccoas c V 5.1105 cane 5(0.d.uerceit slopes 5t, Penwell 'ay tram II : teree^Hypes
t l0 I her,ept copes Meethil..'ay Ipam percent•.roes state forest or p.
2,1 I.,lair mem 1 :o 1 ees c t slopes and large au per
lb l e:oy loam 3 is 5 percent s,ppes >N CI ere R.alm. 1 to 3 eorcent crepe;
17 t c:oy loam 5:0 9 percent slopes 9 ;shingle l 3 to)percent t tones land giant
15 Cc by Ape a •arms.3 o 9 percent slopes 011 ShingleRe chill connote) 3 to 9 percent slopes
Gc:pmbo clay loam.V to 1 percent slopes
Oo:ombo clay loam 1 to 3 percent slopes b1 Tassel fine sandy loam S 1020 percent slopes Lanus of soil Survey
62 Terry tine sandy;corn U to 3 per, slopes
3 sno clay loam J to I percent slopes 63 Terry Ole sandy le am 3 to 9 percent tes
coos, o c ay o r I to 3 sercent slopes 6)1 Thedalund loam I ro 3 percent slopes Field sheet nlatchl
65 Theoarund loam.3 to 9 percent:,tines
F::n Colors It am 0 to 1 percent s'cpes AD HOC BOUNDARY
Fc:t Ccians loam 1 to 3 oer cent slopes 06 Ulm clay Dam 0 1O 3 percent sbrpes
til 'dm clay Inam,3 soy sires
royerson:c r 0 to 1 percent slopes Os ,,:,Lc lomorthents moderately steep Small airport.arr6'
CU Ho'erson loam 1 to 3 percent slopes cemetery or no
moot srty c lay. 1 10 3 percent copes u9 \talent sand.()to 3 percent slopes
de Neat silty cloy 3 to 5 percent slopes /0 Steed saud.3 to'3 percent s:opcs
11 Valent tmrp..entaec.U to 9 Pen tell slopes
owe and, :i:He It le 1 t r dra slopes /: \You loamy overt 010;Fri(VOL,lope., STAlI-COORDINAtI
6) Ca,a urp smuJy Icon 1 I., 1 Prrcunl Slupey '3 Vona loamy sand.i to 5 Percent shoes
n1 Vora Iaaloe sand.5 to 9 percent slopes LAND DIVISION COP
it 8 on team U to 1 percent slopes Vona sandy loam.0 to 1 percent slopes (sections and land i
If aril I to 3 percent slopes 70 Vona sandy ono l to 3 percent Mopes
0 elm loam 3 to.5 per sot slcues „ Van Vana sandy loans.3 to 5 percent slopes ROADS
Kin,loam 5 to 9 Percent slopes
7F Weld loam 0 to 1 pert ens slopes Drvltleo(metlrans
t L'ap Biel loamy sands.'O le 3 percent slopes 19 sEeld loam 1 to 3 per,era slopes d pert-tots)
persl
80 Nest loom 3 to 5 percent slopes
a 4f oe y SOrtaye weeks. S to 10 percent slopes SI Strife;Colby c.unplex.0 to 1 percent slopes Other roads
y
ley Colby complex. I to 3 peseta agues
oi 15.8508 tine sanay tarn U to 3 percent slopes 63 Wiley Lolay ranpl 3 to 5 percent slopes
3.3 tine sandy a to 9 paaoat slopes Trail
se N� oar)
„m 0U Icea=rc ensTapes
.... o ocam. 1:o 3 percent coxes ROAD EMBLEMS&!
N„Hrt bay 10,101 U to I per.ens slcues
Ni.nn clay loam 1 to 3 percent siooes
alu.n'panty sandy 0 to 1 percent slopes Interstate
Federal
State
County tarn or re
RAILROAD
POWER TRANSMISS
(normally not show
PIPE LINE
(normally not shoe
FENCE
(normally not shoe
LEVEES
Without road
With roast
With railroad
sre DAMS
Large (to scale)
Medium or small
..D COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 23
Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue
shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grama. Several rind grasses, such as western wheatgrass
suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc-
vegetation should be continued for as many years as tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years
possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition
have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern deteriorates, the raid grasses decrease; blue gran'ia, buf-
redeedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase;
hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an-
Siberian peashrub, lilac, and American plum. nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer.
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc-
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition.
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into
This soil has good potential for urban and recreational a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a
development. Increased population growth in the survey firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has
area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The proven most successful.
chief limiting feature for urban development and road Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
construction is the limited capacity of the soil to support shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well
a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing
community sewage systems should be provided if the vegetation should be continued for as many years as
copulation density increases. Because of the permeability possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and
Jr the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability class I ir- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
-igated. hack berry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac,
32--Kim loam, 1. to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum.
veil drained soil on smooth plains and alluvial fans at Wildlife is a.n important secondary use of this soil. The
elevations of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked
eposit and parent sediment from a wide variety of pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can
,edrock. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen-
ace loamy sand underlying material,
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop-
Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range-
j
am about 12 inches thick. The upper 28 inches of the un-
land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
erlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a
attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
epth of f,0 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam.
managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
gh. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
urface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. development. Increased population growth in the survey
r cerunoff
irrigated areas this soil suited all z cropsi com- area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The
only grown in the including corn, beets, chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road
any alfalfa,win small grain,area,p including
and orn s.sugarAr exam-, construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support
e of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa communitya load. Septic tankabsorption fields function properly,idedif but
llowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, sewage systems should be provided the
y
beans. Land leveling, ditch lining (fig. 6), and installing population fhesubstratum,density increases. Because lago of the permeability
of the sewage lagoons must be sealed.
relines may be needed for proper water applications. Lawns, shrubs, and trees All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- grow well. Capability subclass
e
He ' gated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site.
ration is the most common. Barnyard manure and cam- 33 Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a deep,
mcial fertilizer are needed for top yields. - drained soil an plains and alluvial fans at elevations
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits
rley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In-
Tter wheat and is summer fallowed in alternate years eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have
allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is loamy sand underlying material.
low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown
Stubble mulch fanning, striperopping, and minimum til- loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 23 inches of the tin-
e are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion, derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a
racing also may be needed to control water erosion. depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam.
24 SOIL SURVEY
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
moderate. This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
In irrigated areas this soil is suited to crops commonly development. Increased population growth in the survey
grown in the area."Perennial grasses and alfalfa or close area has resulted in increased homesite construction. The
grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of the chief limiting soil feature for urban development and road
time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in ir- construction is the limited capacity of this soil to support
rigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, contour a load. Septic tank absorption fields function properly, but
furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for row community sewage systems should be provided if the
crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also suggested. Keeping til- population density increases. Because of the permeability
lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- of the substratum, sewage lagoons must be sealed.
trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass
respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Loamy Plains range site.
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat,
barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to 34—Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep,
winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels well drained soil on plains and alluvial fans at elevations
per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years of 4,900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed eolian deposits
to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is and parent sediment from a wide variety of bedrock. In-
too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. eluded in mapping are small areas of soils that have
Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- loamy sand underlying material.
lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Typically the surface layer is brown and pale brown
Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the un-
The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue derlying material is pale brown loam. The lower part to a
grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass depth of 60 inches is pale brown fine sandy loam.
and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more.
to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is
deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; -blue grama, buf- moderate.
falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive
and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping
nuals invade the site as range condition becomes per It:. system should be limited to such close grown crops as al-
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil also is suited to ir-
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual ;. -tine- rigatcd pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4
tion. Seeding is desirable if the rar is in poor condition. years of ai;alfa followed by 2 years of corn and small
Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop.
grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced
suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin-
seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into klers should be used for new crops. Applications of
a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc-
firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has tion.
proven most successful. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue
Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheat-
shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well grass, and sedge are also prominent. Potential production
suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favorable years to
vegetation should be continued for as many years as 1,500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition •
possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little bluestem
have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern decrease; forage production drops; and blue grama, buf-
redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and falograss, and several perennial forbs and shrubs in-
hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunlcbush sumac, crease. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as •
lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. range condition becomes poorer.
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The Management of vegetation should be based on taking
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed-
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can ing is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sideoats
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, and pu- !:
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- bescent wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- selected should meet the seasonal needs of livestock. It '
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it p`
a
SOIL SURVEY ars.are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable yet.
As
srange
pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass,
shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand
an peashrub.
and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade
Wildlife is an important secondary use o f this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer. 5
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Management of vegetation on this soil should be based _7
is leaving
le if lf range o inal u condition.
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can on taking half and leaving half of the tisotal annual produc-
he attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape tion. Seeding
grama, blue grama,
and
dgpub scent de tgrashould a eesuthe
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats
me and should be included of in plans for habitat develop- ble for seeding.
ment, id expansion
in areas a eyaintensive agriculture.
soil. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it canbendrilled to as
Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into
has resulted o in urbanization n of much of this Olney
e.
This soil has good potential for urban and recreational firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early
development. The only limiting feature is the moderately proven most successful. the principal in ,
rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally
hazard of ground water contamination from sewage suited to this soil. Soil blowing, a hazard of ,
tivating only in the tree row and by
ylleaving strip irrir of n.
lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul-
elas7 lneyteis
be needed at the time of planting, and during dry
� 47 Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental
4,600t 't is a deep, well drained soil on plains ed ta ash d elevations of may al ,,
Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa F
to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival
pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The
Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a are Rocky
shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi-
dark surface layer. Some small leveled areas are also in-
eluded.
Typically n surfaceloam layer this Olney soil is grayish an peashrub.
species can
brown sandy clay loam cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
is yellowish brown esthick. very pale , and escape a t .
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting
about 14 inches The substratum to a depth of 60 pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame
If
cover is essen-
inches is very pale andbrown, calcareous fine sandy loam. tans nesting habitat develop
permeability available water capacity are cover. For pheasants, undisturbed
moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or tial and should be included in p pronghorn antelope, can be
land wildlife, for example, the facilities,, anb
more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is ment, especially in areas oflinens aw tculture Range-
low. develo in
su ar beets, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed.
In irrigated areas this soil cl suited to all crops com- attracted by
P b
mealy grown in the area, including corn, g soil.a
beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes,
is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa has apid resulted expansion
urbanization of much ofthe Olney
area �-
ffoe of a suitable , ccropping feature is and de en rw_
or bed by corn, corn in , ditch lining,n andbeets, installingall development.i The only limiting ntial r urban recreational ort
pi beans. Land leveling, in the substratum, which causes a l,.
methods
may be needed nare for suitable,e but water ow irrigation
All hrazard
permeability ground
round water contamination from sewage abili �
grow well. Capability and trees Plains +'r'.
methods of irrigation furrow irrigation is hazard of g
subclass He irrigated;-`IVe nonirrigated; Sandy `
the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fen- lagoons. Lawns, shrubs,
tilizer are needed for top soilto 3 to 5 slopes. .,
In barl y, and
m. this soil is suited iwinter lantede to range
Olney fine sandy
loam,d on toplains percent elevations slo of
winter
ine r and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted
per
are. The The a average yield is 28 bushels This is a deep, are small areas of soils shad have a
per acre. The soil is summer followed in alternate years 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. �,
dark surface layer and small areas of soils that have -
to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Included in mapping
too low for arm useing of fertiliser. one the it t are this Olney 0 in soil s is grayish
Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sandstone and shale within a depth of 60 inches.
clay loam about t 8 inches thick. The r yish ;
lage are needed control soil blowing and wrterr i Typically ale brown fine sandy y„,'.
Terre pg also n may be needed t on water egesiot brown en sandy depthtt
ass, and blue loam about 12 inchespale hick. helca substratum
fineo a sandy 1pamx 5;
The potential native vegetation on this range site is soil is yellowish brown and very p brdominated ebyd sand read,bluestem, sand reedit - grama, 60 inches is very
and a re also pr, sideoats t depth is 60 ciaches or e -,.
and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential Permeability and available water capacity are
:
production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- moderate. The effective rootingi
J^._
34 - SOIL SURVEY
or drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. Seeding tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of
early in spring has proven most successful. Brush vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation
management can also help to improve deteriorated range. may be needed at the time of planting and during dry
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well periods. Trees that arebest suited and have good survival
suited to this soil. Blowing sand and low available water are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa
capacity are the principal hazards in establishing trees pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The
and shrubs. This soil is so loose that trees should be shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi-
planted in shallow furrows, and vegetation is needed an peashrub.
between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil.
to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non-
good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern game species can be attracted by establishing areas for
redcedar, ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed
best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans
peashrub. for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The agriculture.
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area �r R+.)''.
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can has resulted in urbanization of much of this Otero soil.
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape This soil has excellent potential for urban and recrea- tee'
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- tional development. The only limiting feature is the k
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- moderately rapid permeability in the substratum, which
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- causes a hazard of ground water contamination from
land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be sewage lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well.
attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, Capability subclass Its irrigated. '
managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. 51—Otero sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a sq-.
Few areas of this soil are in major growth and ur- deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,700 to h:..
banized centers. The chief limiting feature is the rapid 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed outwash and eolian
permeability in the substratum, which causes a hazard of deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that
ground water contamination from seepage. Potential for have loam and clay loam underlying material.
recreation is poor because of the sandy surface layer. Typically the surface layer is brown sandy loam about
Capability subclass We irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Deep 12 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60
Sai,nt range site. inches is pale brown calcareous fine sandy loam.
(5y-Otero sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is
deep, well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or
4,700 to 5,250 feet. It formed in mixed outwash and eolian more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is
deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that low.
have loam and cht/ loam underlying inert, n al. This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
Typically the surface layer is brown sandy loam about is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area. Land
12 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines may he
inches is pale brown calcareous fine sandy loam. needed for proper water application.
Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn-
more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
low. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, Y,l.
This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to
is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels
ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, per acre. The soil is suminis_r fallowed in alternate years
and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitaiton is ::t`"
to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, too low for beneficial use of fertilizer.
sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Generally, such charac- Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- }�
teristics as a high clay content or a rapidly permeable lage are needed to control water erosion. Terracing also ';.
substratum slightly restrict some crops. may be needed to control water erosion.
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- The potential native vegetation on this range site is
rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue
management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama,
vial fertilizer are needed for top yields. and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential are"
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- s ..
suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range
establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cur- condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, tr
kia
li µa,
Hello