The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About870039.tiff RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, CONCERNING SITE APPLICATION OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor wishes to construct a lift station on the following described parcel of land, to-wit: Part of the SEa SWa of Section 23 , Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS , the Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works require review of the Site Application by the Board of County Commissioners before construction may be started and , further, that various local and state agencies be given the opportunity to review and comment on said Site Application , and WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor has submitted its Site Application to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County for review and comments, a copy of said Application being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board finds that said Site Application is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and that it is in the best interest of Weld County to recommend approval of said Application . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Site Application of the Town of Windsor be, and hereby is, recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health as being compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be , and hereby is , authorized to sign said Site Application . PL0079 PLocyl -1 H , i ,�.; - , ; _ 870039 Page 2 RE: SITE APPLICATION - TOWN OF WINDSOR The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of January, A.D. , 1987 . �j�� la-4^-444"4"1 ) `�� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: 1�1 (( (�n...v- i WELD COU TY OLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board Go o ac irman/ BY:. _ -' p c c. > C.W. Kirb Pro- em D ut Count CNrk P Y Y S APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner/ /=-��` C Ja que ' ne son e V ttt y County Attorney Frank Yamaguchi 870039 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Lydia Dunbar that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: NAME: Town of Windsor REQUEST: Site application for a proposed lift station LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} SW} of Section 23, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1.25 miles east of the intersection of State Highway 257 and Weld County Road 66 The Weld County Planning Commission recommends approval of this request. The proposed lift station will not adversely affect the local water quality and presently there is a sufficient capacity to serve the proposed development. This request is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in that it is an improvement of an existing sewage treatment plant which services an established incorporated municipality. The proposed development to be served is located in the Town of Windsor. The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections. The Weld County Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Lynn Brown Lydia Dunbar Ivan Gosnell LeAnn Reid Paulette Weaver Ann Garrison Jack Holman The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. 870039 Town of Windsor January 6, 1987 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 6, 1987, and recorded in Book No. XI of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 6th day of January, 1987. 1 oca Bobbie Good Secretary Date: January 6, 1987 NAME: Town of Windsor REQUEST: Site application for a proposed lift station LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} SW} of Section 23, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1.25 miles east of the intersection of State Highway 257 and Weld County Road 66 The Department of Planning Services staff recommends approval of this request. The proposed lift station will not adversely affect the local water quality and presently there is a sufficient capacity to serve the proposed development. This request is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in that it is an improvement of an existing sewage treatment plant which services an established incorporated municipality. The proposed development to be served is located in the Town of Windsor. The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections. The Weld County Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections. Additional Comments Town of Windsor Site Application A subdivision exemption application will be submitted for this site. No building or electrical permits will be issued on the site until the subdivision exemption is approved. LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: December 30, 1986 NAME: Town of Windsor ADDRESS: 116 5th Street, Windsor, CO 80550 REQUEST: Site application for proposed lift station. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} SW} of Section 23, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1} miles east of the intersection of State Highway 257 and Weld County Road 66. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control commission's regulations require that the applicant submit the site application to all appropriate local governments, planning agencies and state agencies for review and comment prior to submission to the Colorado Department of Health's District Engineer. The regulations further state that if the proposed facility is located in the unincorporated area of a county, the county planning agency should be requested to comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the local long-range comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water quality including the location in the flood plain and capacity to serve the planned development. The county agency should also comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water quality for the proposed treatment works to be located within the boundaries of a city or town. The Weld County Health Department and Engineering Department have no objections to this proposal. The Larimer-Weld Regional COG will be submitting a formal recommendation prior to January 23, 1987. TOWN OF WINDSOR ENGINEERING REPORT AND SITE APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED LIFT STATION November 1986 Project No. : 243 .4 Prepared by: Engineering Professionals, Inc. 2000 Vermont Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (303) 226-3852 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter Site Application ii I. Introduction II . Service Area and Design Parameters III . Analysis of Alternative IV. Recommended Alternative V. Implementation VI . Natural Hazards VII. Finance and Management APPENDIX - 1 Mile Radius Map - 5 Mile Radius Map - Cost Estimate - Gravity Sewer Option - Cost Estimate - Lift Station/Force Main Alternate - Service Area Sketch November 14 , 1986 Mr. George Rugg Anheuser Busch Companies One Busch Place St. Louis, MO 63118-1852 Re: MCC Can Plant Project No. : 243 .4 Dear George: Please find enclosed a copy of the Site Application and Engineering Report for the proposed sewage lift station to be located adjacent to Road 66. This material will be submitted to the appropriate agencies after approval and signing by the Town of Windsor. As you are probably aware, the proposed lift station site is located approximately 1100 feet west of the plant. Contained in the report is a revised cost estimate which reflects the additional cost resulting from the gravity sewer between the site and the lift station. The revised project cost is $146 ,750 . Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the Site Application and Engineering Report. Sincerely, ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC. John P. McGinn, P.E. JPM:psm cc: Dennis Wagner, Town of Windsor Enclosures COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2,000 CPO CAPACITY. 8) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: Town of Windsor ADDRESS: 116 5th Street, Windsor, CO 80550 PHONE: (303) 484-5433 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Engineering Professionals, Inc. , 2000 Vermont Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 PHONE: (303) 226-3852 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SE 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 23 Township 6N , Range 67W , Weld County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used Lift Station Hydraulic 230,400 Organic 60 gal/day lbs. 8005/day Present PE Design PE 920 7. Domestic S Industrial 100% 3. Location of facility: Ave. HOD, = 55 mg/1 TSS No Inorganic Chemicals Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. (b) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse N Subsurface disposal Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: 8005- mg/1 SS mg/1 Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? No 6. Present zoning of site area? FA Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? FA; Industrial 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? N/A (Name of Supply) (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? (Name of User) (Address of User) -1- WQCD-7 (Revised 8-83) 8. Who has the responsibility for operating the proposed facility? Town of Windsor 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? The facility will be constructed within public R.O.W. (Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility at this site.) 10. Estimated project cost: $ 142,750 Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility? Construction-Anheuser Busch Companies; Operation-Town of Windsor 11. Names and addresses of all water and/or sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. N/A (Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain or other natural hazard area? Nn If so, what precautions are being taken? Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or other Agency? (Agency Name) If so, what is that designation? 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on your application for site approval. See attached engineering report. 8. Information regarding lift stations: 1. The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following additionai load: Peak Hydraulic (HCD)0.230 (Peak Hour) P.E. to be served 920 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? NO If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3. Describe emergency system in case of station and/or power failure. Emergency power generation at site (automatic). 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: Windsor Wastewater Treatment Plant; 30502 Highway 257; Windsor, CO 80550. 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the treatment plant to 54 % of hydraulic and 29 X of organic capacity and Town of Windsor agrees to treat this wastewater? Yes X No (Treatment Agency) rr� //' �� /p%/,/ � — 7/-i4-s314 , QiI4rY(�Du/[ 1:4-61-11 ,de fear e: /I7//c /1,�eY,L5 Date -2- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date A Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative ,/7'/ �/ / I. �/ZY-5 {� /�O/1241i07:47,n Jf(X//l O//'.�il�.d//A. / Management Agency 0 2. Local Government: Cities or Towns (If site is inside boundary or within three miles) and Sanitation Districts. 3. Board of County Commissioners 4. Local Health Authority 5. City/County Planning Authority 6. Council of Governments/Regional Planning 7. State Geologist (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. �/ DATE / -24-2( �VOirt?ilid ti W Dennis Wagner, P.C. Signs lure of Applicant TYPED NAME -3- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) ATTACHMENT TO SITE APPLICATION In accordance with C.R.S. 1981, 25-8-702 (2)(a), (b), and (c), and the "Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works", the Water Quality Control Division mus determine char each site location is consistent with the longrange, comprehensive planning fr the area in which it is to he located, that the plant on the proposed site will be managed to minimize the potential adverse impacts on water quality, and must encourage the consolidation of wastewater treatment works whenever feasible. In making this determination, the Division requires each applicant for a site approval for a domestic wastewater treatment works to supply an engineering report describing the project an. showing the applicant's capabilities to manage and operate the faility over the life of the project to determine the potential adverse impacts on water quality. The report shall be considered the culmination of the planning process and as a minimum shall address the following: Service area definition including existing population and population projections, flow/loading projections, and relationship to other water and wastewater treatment plants in the area. Proposed effluent limitations as developed in coordination with the Planning and Standard. Section of the Division. (Allow minimum four weeks processing time.) Analysis of existing facilities including performance of those facilities. Analysis of treatment alternatives considered. Flood plain and natural hazard analysis. Detailed description of selected alternatives including legal description of the site, treatment system description, design capacities, and operational staffing needs. Legal arrangements showing control of site for the project life. Institutional arrangements such as contract and/or covenant terms for all users which will be finalized to accomplished acceptable waste treatment. Management capabilities for controlling the wastewater throughout and treatment within th, capacity limitations of the proposed treatment works, i.e., user contracts, operating agreements, pretreatment requirements. Financial system which has been developed to provide for necessary capital and continued operation, maintenance, and replacement through the life of the project. This would include, for example, anticipated fee structure. Implementation plan and schedule including estimated construction time and estimated start—up date. Depending on the proposed project, some of the above items may not be applicable to address. In such cases, simply indicate on the application form the non applicability of those. -4- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide the necessary information for an evaluation of proposed sewage systems improvements for the Town of Windsor. The improvements will be owned and operated by the Town and are being proposed to serve the Metal Container Corporation's Can Plant which is being constructed southeast of the Town. Two alternatives for providing wastewater service to the Metal Container Corp. facility were investigated. One alternative studied was a gravity sewer extending westerly from the plant to the Law Ditch and southerly through Kodak property to an existing interceptor. The other alternative consists of a short section of gravity sewer which would discharge to a lift station adjacent to Road 66 which would pump the wastewater from the plant site to an existing 8" sewer near Road 66 and State Highway 257. The lift station option was selected as the most effective at this time and is the subject of the Site Application. II. SERVICE AREA AND DESIGN PARAMETERS The potential service area for either alternative is limited by the topography of the vicinity and the extent to which the area will develop. The anticipated ultimate service area is identified on a sketch included in the appendix. Because this area is located well outside of the established limits of the Town, this area is neither annexed to the Town or zoned (with the exception of the plant site) . It is likely that this area will eventually be annexed and include some industrial land use given existing development in the area. Future land use predictions within the identified service area at this time would be premature according to the Town. For this reason, the peak hour discharge from the plant facility (160 GPM) was used as a design flow. The peak hour flow was obtained by allocating the maximum daily flow over a period of 16 hours and then adding a small amount for peaking due to domestic uses at breaks or lunches. Effluent from the plant will be pretreated prior to being discharge. The maximum BOD5 is estimated at 61 mg/1 total suspended solids. No inorganic chemicals are anticipated to be discharged by the plant. Although ultimate service area flows could not be predicted or utilized in sizing, consideration was given to routing and placement of facilities to maximize their potential in serving the area. It should be noted that the Town of Windsor' s Wastewater Treatment plant currently operates at approximately 50% of capacity and well within design parameters. It is anticipated that a gravity sewer, sized for ultimate flows will be constructed from Road 66 to the interceptor located south of the Kodak property when development warrants it. III. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 1 . GRAVITY SEWER The gravity sewer would parallel Road 66 for a distance of 3150 + feet west of the plant site to a point just east of the Law Ditch. From the Law Ditch the alignment will be directed due south for a distance of approximately 6600 feet and tie into the existing Town of Windsor sewer line lying south of the Kodak delivery road. Although sufficient grade is available for this alternative it is marginal. A grade of 0.24% would be required to serve the plant which would result in nearly half of the line being laid at a depth greater than 10 feet. It should also be noted that the 0.24% grade is considered inadequate for the minimum sewer size of 8" and therefore a 10 " diameter line would be required for the entire length. Because of the depth and probability of groundwater (based upon review of nearby soils reports) the need for a fair amount of construction clearance would be necessary for this installation. Clearance through the Kodak property is sufficient however an installation along Road 66 would require a significant easement to avoid water lines (10' required offset) and interference with other utilities. Since our investigation revealed that Kodak is unwilling to discuss an easement adjacent to Road 66 and east of their entrance our proposed alignment would place the line 15 feet north of the Road 66 north right-of-way within a 20 foot easement. Major crossings would include Road 66 , Kodak's Delivery Road, the Whitney Ditch and the Law Ditch. Although crossings could be open cut, casings should be included and cut off walls provided on ditches where the topography slopes downward away from the ditch. The estimated project cost for this alternative is $236 , 000. Refer to the appendix for a detailed cost estimate. Advantages 1. Maintenance and Operation - Gravity sewers are obviously not susceptible to the equipment malfunctions as are sewers requiring lift stations. Also maintenance costs associated with gravity sewers are considerably less than lift stations. 2 . Future Connections to Line - Gravity sewers can be accessed at any point providing there is adequate fall from the site to be served and the pipe. The capacity of the proposed 10" line at 0.24% is 693 gpm, substantially more than the 160 gpm design flow of the plant. Developing areas north of Route 66 or west of the Kodak could utilize this remaining capacity. 3 . The gravity sewer option does not require the lengthy site approval process and lengthy materials delivery period and can be constructed much quicker. Disadvantages 1 . Depth of Line - Grade constraints on the sewer line combined with the topography result in areas of excessively deep sewer. Approximately 4500 feet of line is deeper than 10 feet, with most of that length in the 13-14 foot deep range. The groundwater table is anticipated to be encountered at a 9-10 foot depth, based on soil borings taken at the plant site. Trenching below ground water depth increases construction costs as well as easement width requirement. 2 . Easement Requirements - More easement is required for this option, both along Road 66 and through Kodak property (although Kodak does not appear to present a problem) . 3 . The alignment through Kodak could be in the way of a future major interceptor needed to serve the unannexed service area. 2 . LIFT STATION AND FORCEMAIN This option would consist of 10" gravity sewer from the southwest corner of the plant site due west some 1100 feet to a lift station. The sewage would then be pumped some 4900 feet west along Road 66 where it would be discharged into the Town' s existing system. The connection point would be approximately 1100 feet east of State Highway 257 , in a manhole located in the Farmers Inn parking lot. The lack of vertical fall along this route dictates that a force main or combination gravity sewer/force main be utilized. The gravity portion of the sewer will be designed such it can be utilized when the future gravity sewer is constructed. Due to the peak wastewater flow (160 gpm) , a 6 " line is the minimum practical force main required. The force main can be installed and placed as easily as a water main since water main materials and most water main criteria are applicable. The proposed preliminary alignment of force main is shown on the sketch in the appendix. Because of the needed capacity and minimum force main size, grinder pumps or submersible pumps were not considered for use in this installation. In order to size and estimate the pumping and backup power facilities, Smith and Lovelace lift station equipment and Onan power equipment was sized for preliminary work. The estimated project cost for the lift station/force main alternative is $145, 750. Refer to the appendix for a cost breakdown. Advantages 1 . Pipe Alignment/Easements - As the force main does not depend on gravity flow the pipe can be laid at uniform depth from the ground surface, typically 5 feet. As a result deep trenches and related easement and construction costs are lower, which is reflected in the total cost. 2 . By keeping the gravity alignment open, the ultimate route of an interceptor required to serve the annexed area will be maintained. Disadvantages 1 . Maintenance and Operation - Continual maintenance and operating costs associated with the lift station are higher than with gravity sewer. In addition to electricity cost, manpower cost to monitor the lift station will be required. 2 . Longer Implementation Period - due to equipment delivery and state site application process. IV. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE A preliminary design report which analyzed the pros and cons of both alternatives was reviewed by representatives of both the Town and the plant. The consensus of opinion was that very little benefit would be realized from the substantially higher cost of constructing a gravity sewer now which could not be sized for ultimate flows. Primarily for this reason, the lift station/force main has been identified as the preferable method of serving the plant site. It was also felt that the gravity sewer would interfere with the trunk line which ultimately will be built to serve the area east of the Town if and when it develops . The primary disadvantage of the lift station/force main is the continual maintenance required. Consideration was given to this and the Town has indicated they have the resources and personnel necessary to perform this function. Below is a listing of the basic hydraulic system data and base design criteria for the lift station/force main alternative along Road 66 . The original supporting calculations and supporting data are attached in the technical appendix: Pump Station Style: Dual pumps - surface mounted over wetwell (see diagram in technical appendix) . Head/Capacity: 30 .5 feet/ 184 gpm ( see pump curves in technical appendix) . Horsepower: 3 HP pump, 3 phase, 110/220 . Backup Power: 15 KW with automatic transfer switch (diesel or propane option) . Electric : Public Service Force Main: 6" PVC (C-900 ; SDR-25) V. IMPLEMENTATION Design and construction including the site application review process would take approximately 24 weeks. It is anticipated that the construction would be completed in April 1987 with start-up shortly thereafter. VI. NATURAL HAZARDS The proposed lift station site is located outside the 100-year flood plain for the Poudre River. Other hazards are not present on the site. VII. FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT Total project cost for the lift station and force main is estimated at $136, 000. Refer to the detailed estimate in the appendix for a cost breakdown. Anheuser-Busch, the owner of the Can Plant has agreed to fund the project construction in its entirety. The lift station and force main will be owned by the Town of Windsor and operated by the Town's Public Works Department. An easement for the lift station site is currently being negotiated for with the property owner. "3 -, APPENDIX 4 r • T •• 1 � •' '' '/, _ . .I�'i ' Nell 1 • . r O II Wi dsor i •• / ::::47694:775. �_� 4 •' -4. ' `W/ I Q l NI,125] ;C(:ictc :: P FOPOSE0 • • he 4 765 ITYP.�, 5T4T/ON )VA( I Comer • • I Er -' •-__ _ ._ -, WHITNEY ec, t1! I ras7 iL: it / � . \ ' ! �� I ■ • n r i Amor • - If.- = • ',.. t.r....-\.„, I 1 i N i il . .,4.,----- __ ..__.) • I 1I I .••--_ _ - V'- _� ./ =%� ��;;� ONE MILE • �` \P RAP/US MAP // ENGINEERING ~ PROFESSIONALS INC. _ 2000 Veimonl D, Foil Collint C080525 ,— �\� kti '% � -- 'e '` J a� tom'_ F PP{{ L____71 I, 1 � 1Iy{r{I` f rI'' I ? tY. ' 1 (),1,-‘:).1 i 3 �: ./ rte J'`_, I� .. 1_.i y.13 t In I. (..- .... - w• ------7,-w---r,—. --! \ ' T n lU 13 • I Q y�: :I__ eHa III 3• 'QZ r :74 -,-_, r'T .1 W E r • ♦ • +C 1.H r C • ` w / P b -1- ((" c .41.E _ t t >� gct Q ■i•■r'r..'■ Laki k, • • i. • /fit _ - I% n f % 1/ Y • 11 - I I` 0`) S .. 1R a- et ry ,..I e ...,...r,.,-_ t. •,� `. .... .� i l r,l ! / r r A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - GRAVITY SEWER OPTION Description Quantity Unit Price Total 10" PVC Sewer Line SDR 35 (5-10 ' Depth) 5250 LF $ 16 .00 $ 84, 000 10" PVC Sewer Line SDR 35 (10-15 ' Depth) 4500 LF 18. 00 81, 000 Manhole 4 ' Diameter 5-10 ' Depth 15 EA 1050 .00 15 ,750 Manhole 4 ' Diameter 10-15 ' Depth 13 EA 1250 . 00 16, 250 Road 66 Crossing 1 EA 800 .00 800 Law Ditch Crossing 1 LS 1750 . 00 1,750 Whitney Ditch Crossing 1 LS 1750 .00 1,750 Contractor ' s Road Crossing 1 EA 800 .00 800 Connection to Existing Sewer (new manhole) 1 EA 1500 . 00 1, 500 Subtotal : $ 203, 600 10% Admin. , Legal and Contingency: $ 20, 360 Final Design: $ 7 , 100 Easement Acquisition and Property Restoration $ 4, 865 Total : $ 235, 925 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN OPTION Item Quantity Unit Price Total 6" Diameter Force Main PVC - SDR 18 4900 LF 8.60 42, 140 10" Sewer - PVC SDR 35 1150 LF 16 .00 18, 400 Cleanouts 4 EA 1000.00 4, 000 4 ' Manhole 2 EA 1100 .00 2, 200 ARV Assembly and Vault 2 EA 1500.00 3, 000 Lift Station (Surface * Mount) 1 LS 17, 000.00 17, 000 Wet Well 1 LS 2,000.00 2, 000 Generator & ATS 1 LS 12,500.00 12,500 Wiring 1 LS 1, 200.00 1,200 Electrical Service 1 LS 9, 000.00 9,000 Gen/AB Pads 1 LS 750.00 750 Site Work 1 LS 3,700.00 3,700 Fencing 120 LF 7.00 840 Telemetry (Alarm) 1 LS 1, 000.00 1, 000 Lift Station & Misc. Installation 1 LS 4,500.00 4, 500 Subtotal : 122,230 10% Administration, Legal & Contingency: 12,223 Final Design: 9, 300 Easement Acquisition & Property Restoration: 3, 000 Total: * * 146,753 e 1.- N . I OA W' Cdsor (86( !)O2 / 46a) I t • •-•• ' iln �� . - _ 11 / ' \ POTENT/AL FUTL%rzE . SERV/CE A,QE4 _ �'�^ Y1�lell • • MCC C..1N PLANT 1 .f.", SITE(PRA 'OSED �fr ERV ERREA) .._ ' EXISTING 8M4765 ---, j -. SEWER / Come t-, r___,..abK___dg • , T PTa n t fr PROPOSED FORCE 4 16 /______T. • PROPOSED L/FT , • MAIN ( J145 ' natistac3STATION SITE -- 4 a '1- . ■ / Ls ct Sir. f3,.. J` 1 ' • WHITNEY -. FUTUR�' GRAY?Y II r '• QT - • • • _; • SEWER' 1 11 II - t4 it • 1t F I. AI *� r inAl\ . el --:\ r'• 1 ' I! rasa ` { ..$_ - . I _ aas - } i A .,1 • c1 / L "ER ca:T/A/G--- z i ' ! E 7 • ....., 1 "' 3 ' (flit SERV/CE AREA ENGINEERING 4 767 �� SKETCH INC. ' PROFESSIONALS VeimoN aCollinsC Di fl GOtlOS?5 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting January 6, 1987 Page 3 - MOTION: Paulette Weaver moved Case Number USR-771:86:52 for Robert See for a Use by Special Review permit for a change in a nonconforming use for a cultured marble fabrication facility in an R-1 (low density residential) zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendations, conditions, and Development Standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Lynn Brown — yes; Lydia Dunbar — yes; Ivan Gosnell - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Paulette Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Jack Holman - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: None APPLICANT: Town of Windsor REQUEST: Site application for a proposed lift station. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part SE} SWi of Section 23, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado: LOCATION: Approximately 1.25 miles east of the intersection of State Highway 257 and Weld County Road 66. APPEARANCE: John P. McGinn, P.E. , Engineering Professionals, Inc. , stated the lift station will serve the Metal Container Corporation's Can Factory which is a subsidiary of Anheuser Busch Companies. This will pump the waste water from the can factory into the Windsor sewer system. The only thing actually in Weld County is a twenty-five by twenty-five foot parcel of land for the lift station. There will be a cedar privacy fence around the lift station and very little will be visible to the public. They will be applying for a subdivision exemption for this land, but it will not be signed by the property owners until this application has been approved. Tape 265 - Side 1 The Chairman asked the Mr. McGuinn if the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff had been reviewed. They have and they have no objections to them. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting January 6, 1987 Page 4 MOTION: _ Lydia Dunbar moved the site application for a proposed lift station for the Town of Windsor be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony of the applicant. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Lynn Brown — yes; Lydia Dunbar — yes; Ivan Gosnell - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Paulette Weaver - Yes; Ann Garrison - yes; Jack Holman - yes. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bobbie Good Secretary Y�l Hello