The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About891037.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR GREYHOUND DOG KENNEL (150 DOGS MAXIMUM) - KENT POLLARD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 27th day of September, 1989, at the hour of 10: 00 a.m. , in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Kent Pollard, 4350 Harback Mile Road, Bennett, Colorado 80102, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a greyhound dog kennel (150 dogs maximum) on the following described real estate, to-wit: SW$ , Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was present, and WHEREAS, Section 24 . 4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24 . 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24 . 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan' s Agricultural Goals and Policies. The Special Review Permit site is nonproductive farmground. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District and is provided for as a / //�� Use by Special Review. 7,to 987 - : 891037 Page 2 RE: USR - POLLARD c. The uses which would be permitted on the property will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include nonproductive farmground, rural residences, oil and gas production, a turkey farm, and a large cattle livestock confinement operation which is located in part of the northeast quarter of this section. The use of the property is compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural Zone District. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a greyhound dog kennel (150 dogs maximum) on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3 . Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Soil Erosion Control Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. 4 . Prior to recording, the Special Review Permit plat shall be amended to show a reservation of 50 feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 49 . 891037 Page 3 RE: USR - POLLARD The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th day of September, A.D. , 1989 . t ��I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, hairman EXCUSED -B °— -„ni-'-c- t.lij Jac ine Johnson, Pro-Tem eputy County C rk APPR VED AS TO FORM: ene R. Brran� r Ceorg� e Ke �y dy V County Attorney Gor.p . 891037 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LENT POLLARD USR-890 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a greyhound kennel in the A (Agricultural) Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. The maximum number of dogs shall not exceed 150. 2 . Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 , C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the kennel area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4 . Liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. _5 . No permanent disposal of wastes other than dog manure shall be permitted at this site. -6 . Wood shavings, sawdust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 7. Fugitive dust must be confined on this site. 8. The well water provided to the animals shall be potable. 9. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed 55 dB (A) from 8 : 00 p.m. until 6 :00 a.m. and from 6 : 00 a.m. until 8: 00 p.m. shall not exceed 80dB (A) as measured by 25-12-102, C.R.S. 891037 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - POLLARD 10. An individual sewage disposal system or vault is required for -the dog kitchen and employee restroom facilities. The system shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and installed according to Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System regulations. Any floor drains or liquid waste streams shall be disposed by an authorized Individual Sewage Disposal System according to Weld County regulations. 11 . The Soil Erosion Control Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil Conservation District shall be maintained on the property. 12. The greyhound kennel facility shall comply with the Colorado Racing Commission's Rules and Regulations pertaining to greyhound kennels. 13. No structure shall be constructed within Panhandle Eastern -Pipe Line Company' s 65-foot right-of-way easement. 14 . Written approval shall be obtained from Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company for the construction of utility lines, streets, sidewalks, and driveways within Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company's 65-foot right-of-way easement. Two working days prior to the start of construction, the Utility Notification Center of Colorado shall be notified so that all utilities can be located and identified. 15 . All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16 . The property owner or operator shall he responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 .5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 . 6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, West Greeley Soil Conservation District, and Weld County l2epartment of Planning Services shall be granted access onto -the property at any reasonable time in order to -ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 891037 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - POLLARD 19. The Special 1fevi-w area shall be limited to the plans shown -herein and -governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans Cr Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 891037 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-43 RE: SITE -SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW -PERMIT FOR A GREYHOUND DOG KENNEL (150 DOGS MAXIMUM) - KENT -POLLARD A =public hearing was conducted on _September 27, 1989, at 10:00 -A.M. , with the 'following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem - Excused Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting -Clerk to the Board, Mary -Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, I.anell Curry The following business -was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice -dated August 23, 1989, and duly published September 14, 1-989, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Kent -Pollard for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a greyhound dog kennel (150 dogs maximum) . Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Lanell Curry, -representing the Planning Department, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Kent Pollard, the applicant, was present to explain this request and answer questions of the Board. Mr. Pollard said the water supply is adequate, and that he has no problems -with the four Conditions and twenty Development Standards contained in the Planning Commission's recommendation. Florence -Purger, representing -Rose Herman, an owner of adjacent -Property, asked Mr. Pollard several questions about the proposed operation. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the request of Kent -Pollard for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit, subject to the Conditions and Development Standards recommended by the Planning Commission. Seconded by -Commissioner Brantner, the motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 2nd -day of October, 1989. APPROVED: �Lttutt J BOARD OF COUNTY -COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder end Clerk to the Boa C.W. Kirby, Chai an By: L&_- EXCUSED Deputy County Cle . Jacque i Johnson, Pro-Tem n� � ne Brantner George Kenned Gor on . c EAPE #89-40 DOCKET #89-43 PL0481 891037 ;7_) y ,' :, r�� A T T E N D A N C E RECORD TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS, FOLLOWS: SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 DOCK-ET #89-43 USR-GREYHOUND DOG KENNEL (150 DOGS MAXIMUM) , KENT POLLARD PLEASE write or print legibly your-name, address and the DOC # (as listed above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING /FA)r l'oee ! t ef?co Mbeaticr< 891037 PUBLIC NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on September 27, 1989, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: Kent Pollard 4350 Harback Mile Road Bennett, Colorado 80102 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Greyhound dog kennel (150 dogs maximum) SIZE OF PARCEL: 160 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: October 5, 1989, in The New News 891037 PUBLIC Nonce The p�vSfed 27,aa16�l�,poo rMom Permi for the dns. eol PW'aval pit asses o Ankle dL'.Nre nn.. Pauera, et le Road, emu, 18 owTlOioN:so4td Aaoae 86 Wert o[ the &h P.M., Sfl INTENSITY OF n acres, mor less b d daPPneal wW result Fof the vested BOARD OF BY:NAR , t \.7 i ..-----/teVi&.ex_/C--e),--xaF--a.i--- 391037 OF COfO ROY ROMER � visit � O�d Governor H mm OI JERIS A. DA sneer N �.o�yy/��/'' * State Engineer *187S- OFFICE OFT-HE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman$treet Room818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 September 22, 1989 Ms. Lanell J. Curry Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Kent Pollard - Special Review Permit Sec. 18, T3N, R64W, -6TH PM Dear Ms. Curry: { -We have reviewed the above referenced special review permit for a greyhound kennel -on a 160 acre parcel . The application does not detail water use requirements. The proposed water supply is to be an on lot well . -A permit application has been submitted to this office and a permit will -be issued. The -permit will limit the rate of diversion to 15 gallons _per minute and annual appropriation to 6.5 acre feet for the proposed uses. If these conditions are acceptable to the applicant, then we have no objection to the proposal and recommend approval . Sincerely,QvneJ? zes R. Hall , P.E. Supervising Water Resources Engineer JRH/JTS:clf/522-4I cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer Bruce DeBrine 1 I SEP 2 5 1989 ; c� tl Weld to. Mann umnus o, 991037 r-t.•>i73. I C.>� Summary of the Weld County -Planning Commission Meeting September 13I,• 1989 Page 8 The Chairman asked the secretary to -poll the members of the 3 lanning Commission for their decision. Jerry -Kiefer - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Ernie -toss - Yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-d390 APPLICANT: Kent -Pollard REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Greyhound -Kennel (130 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32, east of Weld County Road 39 APPEARANCE: Kent -Pollard, property owner and applicant, stated this is a request to build greyhound kennels and runs for up to 150 greyhounds. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. Terry Crane, panhandle Eastern -Pipe Line Company stated he -would like to be notified -prior to any xonstruction being started because they have a right—of—way through the property. The Chairman asked Mr. T ollard if he had any objections to the recommendation, conditions, and -Development Standards presented by the Department of Planning Services staff. Re stated he had none. The Chairman asked the secretary to file these items with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number USR-890 for Kent Pollard for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Greyhound Kennel (150 dogs) in the Agricultural zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission' s recommendation for approval tuned upon the recommendati-on, -conditions, and Development Standards as presented by the staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the -Planning Commission. Discussion followed. S91O37 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 19, 1989 Page 8 The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their Jecisivn. ,Terry Ki-efer - yes; Bud Clemons - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Judy Yamaguchi - yes; Ernie Ross - Yes. _Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adj-ourned at 3:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, I3 t..tsra�a Bobbie Good Secretary 891037 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Jerry Kiefer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application bor: CASE NUMBER: USR-890 NAME: Kent Pollard ADDRESS: 43-50 Harback Mile -toad, Bennett, CO 50102 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development _Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32, -east of Weld County Road 49 he recommended favorably to she Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance -with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning -Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Agricultural goals and policies. The Special Review permit site is nonproductive iarmground. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural zone district and is provided for -as -a Use by Special -Review. - The uses which would be permitted on the property will be compatible with the exi-sting surrounding land uses which include nonproductive larmground, rural _residences, oil and gas production, a Sur-key farm, and a large tattle livestock confinement operation, which is located in part of the northeast quarter of this section. The use of the property is compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. — No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and 'County. 891037 Kent Pollard USR-890 Page 2 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services andbe ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. -The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any Building or electrical permits Be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be _recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to the issuance -of building permit-s, a soil erosion control plan approved by the West Greeley Soil Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. 4. Prior to recording, the Special Review Permit plat shall be amended to show a reservation of 50 feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 49. Motion seconded by Rick Iverson. For Passage Against Passage Jerry Kiefer Bud Clemons Rick Iverson Judy Yamaguchi Ernie Ross The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. 821037 Kent Pollard USR-890 Page 3 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording _Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on September 19, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 20th day of September, 1989. 13 o\-.. ti �om� Bobbie Good Secretary 891037 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS KENT POLLARD USR-890 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a greyhound kennel in the A (Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. The maximum number of dogs shall not exceed 150. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the kennel area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 4. Liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for _final inal disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes other than dog -manure shall be permitted at this site. 6. Wood -shavings, sawdust, and waste materials -shall be handled, stored, and disposed -in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other -potential nuisance _conditions. 7. Fugitive dust -must be confined -on this site. 8. The well water provided to the -animals shall be potable. 9. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed 55 dB(A) from 8:00 p.m. until -6:00 a.m. and from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. shall not exceed 80dB(A) as measured by 23-12-102, C.R.S. 10. An individual sewage disposal system or vault is required for the dog kitchen and employee restroom facilities. The system shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and installed according to Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System -regulations. Any floor trains or liquid waste streams shall be disposed by an authorized Individual Sewage Disposal System according to Weld _County regulations. 891037 Development Standards USR-890 Page 2 11. The soil erosion control plan approved by the West Greeley Soil Conservation District shall be maintained on the property. 12. The greyhound kennel facility shall comply with the Colorado Racing Commission's Rules and Regulations pertaining to greyhound kennels. 13. No structure shall be constructed within Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company's 65 foot right-of-way easement. 14. Written approval shall be obtained from Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company for the construction of utility lines, streets, sidewalks, and driveways within Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company's 65 foot right-of-way easement. Two working days prior to the start of construction, the Utility Notification Center of Colorado shall be notified so that all utilities can be located and identified. 15. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 16. The property owner 9r operator shall he -responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 18. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, West Greeley Soil Conservation District, and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon -and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 19. The Special Review arta shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major -changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown 9r stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County _Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 20. The property -owner or operator shall be -responsible for complying with all of the foregoing (Development Standards. Noncompli-ante with any -of the foregoing Development Standards may be season for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioner-s. 891037 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS USR-890 RENT POLLARD A livestock confinement operation is permitted in part of the northeast quarter of this section for up to 22,000 head of cattle. Several bluffs effectively separate the livestock confinement operation from this quarter section. One objection to this proposal has been received from a representative of the livestock confinement operation. 3010 37 I INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED YOR CONSIDERATION Applicant: Kent Pollard Case Number USR 590 Submitted or Prepared Prior to Hearin& At Hearin 1. -Application 20 -Pages X 2. Dne application plat(s) one page(s) X 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet X 4. DPS Recommendation X 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List X 6. DPS Mineral Owner's Mailing List X 7. Three DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician X S. DPS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet X 1D. DPS Field Check X 11. 9-12-89 referral from Weld County Engineering X 12. 8-31-89 Referral from Feld County -Health Dept. X 13. 9-11-89 Referral from West Greeley -Soil Conservation Service X 14. 9-1-89 referral from USDA - Animal Care Western Sector X 15. 9-1-89 referral from La Salle Fire District IC 16. 8-25-89 referral from Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation District X I hereby certify that the t6 items identified -herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further -certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's -office on September 22, 1989. (7 Cut Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) // �((/// ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIFIDQAND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS : XI-day rf u..,�\_z_\,,,_\,,,, 19 R`\ . sE2TARy ..1} VNOTARY UBLIC r r^ r'0`� My Commission Expires .n. 337 i EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case US K' U'[- 0C Exhibit Submit te-d By Exhibit Description A. ei<IZ yid T /r -e-GIA c . /( 1� (9011 ianc.e at/e/LzLQ _ Q 23 B. 24th h gm. Ara c• tith.11./11 -J 721., Lim,/htyriI� O� l�Ji/ln.O ,/il,zl/�7, p� D. laiL -A.chq)471uniA k A/1n o.v1ern / jL(�C4T71-"-t'.h a4_1 E. AIIi9 L a% lrh2/IL 1�/ 'kJ F. dittt tffctt aA.L.fori 27J7/2. G. - 7 A 'i' (i H. I. J. K. L. M. N. 0. 891037 Data: September 1-9, 1989 CASE NUMBER: USR-890 NAME: Kent Pollard ADDRESS: 4350 Harback Mile Road, Bennett, CO 80102 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development -Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32, east of Weld County Road 49 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF -RECOMMENDS THAT -THIS -REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING -REASONS: 1. The submitted -materials are in compliance -with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the -Weld County Comprehensive Plan's -Agricultural goals and policies. The Special Review permit site is nonproductive farmground. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. - The uses which would be permitted on the property will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses which include nonproductive farmground, rural residences, oil and gas production, a turkey farm, and a Large cattle livestock confinement -operation, which is located in part of the northeast quarter of this section. The use of the property is compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the Agricultural zone district. - No overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review Development Standards Mill provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation As based, in part, upon a Teview of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. 891037 Kent Pollard USR-890 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be adopted and -placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's 'office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is wady to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk -and ]tecorder. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, t soil erosion control plan approved _by the West Greeley Soil £onserv-ation District shall be -submitted to the Department tf Planning Services. 4. Prior to recording, the Special Review -permit plat shall be amended to show a reservation of SO feet from the centerline -of Weld County Road 49. 031337 1 `` DEPART'" IT OF PLANNING SERVICES DREW SCHELT I NGA nq WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPT Kr 97.3 N. 11TH AVENUE w GREELE , CO 80 432 iAll G 9 e- 1989 i •yt 4•' 4:) illacanaamatuanur • CASE NUMBER US B• F I �] ] V/ COLORADO j 14� SEP 1 3 1989 1 y August 23, 1989 'Nolen Phan ammission TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Kent Pollard for a Site -Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of lend is described as the SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of Weld County Read 32 and east of Weld County Road 49. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please -reply by September 6, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Cheek the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. _ 2. We do not hove _a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: I 3.� We have -reviewed the request and find no conflicts with cia interests. 4. A formal recommendation -is under consideration and will he submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the _enclosed letter. Signed: /,ma / 02.1~ Agency: aQ le--e.-�- ,i% Date: 9/ / ( . g9 / 891037 jri ! 112:21 p c989 1 in MEMORAn®U .1. t Weld County Planning August'31-; $"98 wine To Date Environmental Protection Services ��/�.2� � 7j /'/'�) , /,` 9.ye�;,� COLORADO From XIQ�/ ��" �"�/' y/-`�U!/�dnie(j�:' Case Number: USR-890 Name: Pollard, Kent Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile manure from the kennel area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. The manure piles shall not be allowed to exist or deteriorate to a condition that facilitates excessive odors, flies, or insect pests, or pollutant runoff. The manure storage site shall have a water-tight surface which does not permit seepage or percolation of manure pollutants into the ground. 2. Liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 3. No permanent disposal of wastes other than dog manure shall be permitted at this _site. 4. Wood shavings, saw dust, and waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that Controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 5. Fugitive dust must be confined on this site. 6. It should be determined that the well water to be -provided for the animals is potable. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed 55dB(A) from 8:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. and from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 a.m. shall not exceed 80dB(A) as measured by 25-12-102 CRS. 8. An individual sewage disposal system or vault is required for the dog kitchen and employee restroom facilities. The system shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and installed according to Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System regulations. Any floor _drains or liquid waste streams shall be disposed by an authorized Individual Sewage Disposal _System according to Weld County regulations. WP170/cs 891"-Q® �3ry/ i UNITED STATES 4302 West 9th Street Road DEPARTMENT OF Soil Conservation Service Greeley , Colorado 80634 AGRICULTURE Greeley Field Office ( 303 ) 356-6506 September 11 , 1989 Milton Baumgartner West Greeley Soil Conservation District 4302 W . 9th 3t . Rd . (Greeley , CO X0632 Weld County Case Number : USR-890 RE : Kent Pollard , Site Specific Development Plam and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel - to be located in SW1 /4 Section 18 , T3N , R64W. Dear Mr . Baumgartner : The site is comprised of primarily 2/3 ( 70 ) Valent Sand , 3-9% slope , and about 1 /3 ( 72 ) Vona Loamy Sand , 0-3% slope . Due to this fact , wind erosion is the prime erosion factor as both these soils are very susceptible to wind erosion when there is a loss of surface protection such as loss of vegetation or the soil surface is left bare . I would suggest Mr. Pollard keep surface vegetative disturbances to a minimum and only grade those areas essential for building construction , and k-eep that to as small as possible . Roadways should be covered with good quality roadbase material to prevent blowout conditions from occuring . Kennel runways and interior fenced should be left in native vegetation as much as practical to prevent or lessen wind erosion . Revegetation should be considered as soon as possible after construction to suited grass species to decrease wind erosion potential . Special care will be needed to select adapted tree species for wind breaks and tree plantings due to low water holding capacity of the site soils . I recommend approval of this appl icat ion with the above comments . S i nr ,e l y , Ronald D . Miller- ^` ,r\04"1 District Conservationist Greeley Field Office SEP 1 3 1989 Li 891037 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: September 12, 1989 CASE NUMBER: USR-890 NAME: Kent Pollard ADDRESS: 4350 Harback Mile Road, Bennett, CO 80102 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32, east of Weld County Road 49 SIZE OF PARCEL: 160 acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, La Salle Fire District, and United States Department of Agriculture - Animal Care Western Sector. One telephone objection has been received from a surrounding property owner. 891037 ra=ra-y I •\ LUCERNE • ° • !no _ __ • ap. ao • N tt •• c • •. NION 1 1 i - •i • 1,• • • • 1,--•1� AIL/F/L •��.r. • ° • • - \G LL I / •• I • •• .n art[ { • snap { • i ci J •cw{ pp •• L" " 1 • • • .II! reu �• • to a a • it a 34 ll 33 35 • • • •. .,,Q, •_ • 1am Ex .• •a a, • , °L GREEL Y . :. O OI • I.� 1 +- _ /1 •••e ° • • •• ItE ueEY1� 1• �, •I f 1 • H 0 (/ H _ • i. E�<N 1 •• 11-1- _�L� ♦ 4 1! _ _ to /• I . I 111 j i° I I° !• ]• • • I LO/MT • ...1.+I �M 10 • • • • '`NOrt •.•r - ' __]._-!L _ _ _ - Cl. •. I • .w Fre} .I �1� • / � 1.14•01-I:•I 11 it • IS I • -�` 8.1 IM.Tr } L �[;, ; ; • I. Il •1 H / N• • • •a r • _ •I• I ••• II ' "' MICA C �`,• •° •• • • •I • °•• 8.l x II Io II .1, It• ea, 1 e. 0 I Mk.! a I ,1 -_ - - - - .• 7•• • •fI • • : a • 1•• x• '• » a as o • Eel f' I .. I I 11, „� • .• I. I. 30 is . r 541 • J • ' • l r,- \ ; • — - I — - - — - - -_ tt‘J I • •I I • ' t V .' • a I • , a . I . 1 - ---- , ' - - - ----- - 1? .1 I1 � • •• • j -'...•..•... • --- ep -- - -- „ ,. g • ij • N j �', iI 1 - I H •!�'iI �. I, . " 6/ e x' i - , j If] I• I • 2, Ix n I• H IIYYII I 9910� jr' 22 I n MMM� • \It, • 1 ,e M y M is is Il a I• t/ t• rV • 111 I 4119 I.i. �� m �.1 0 �.� 0 p 7 .__,.., ,, 7 1 \ r �/! o i I!, '4835 12 4422 - WmCmnl - Q \ 6 W nem Jl ) —_-- ` ��. o. 44096 Z a>6B 8 4715 4432K / p o J a o x.1831 - y0 _ Ip c oII ap0 Well _Li 4.8.31 ` . "_ _ _ ya)3^s IL \r 48,9 . - 44651 Well.4423 - o>401I o ^Sky;View-School f h I CO 45100 Ai VNinc rll '.> + - 4712 ��60� t Q � V Well r 1 4. w 4453 a> 1 li CU \J r �I - a t�Y— P �+ t [_ _, Well. A 2850 8�wV!'_Vo 446001 nyryl �Wrp mill '484.7 1 _ BM - - d 47651 Well, Well; , 24580 �i 20 - :4809 ` 1\� 0 Fr `, , 4761 1.��. ` 4n/+ _ j I 0 ri r ) na c_..„,/_____ - .- JO — Windmill J' (' �t , itli `/3 ^i 64445 j 24- )C] •4795 1-9f—.Z7. 4469 47// U 411 1 c' —20 I s N 4 37 4844 T — - -- 11782 - aV\ — +-1::I , /. 4960 4778 jylnamul \ 4494 1 0 �' _ - Wrnamrn ; 11`` O 0 25 44946 30 - r -- \410 J 1 �o La 0 _ri C2 NT-, , r �, 4a, N L,2, I ft v I _ .. . a- e. rYt'T O/9 Y'•x t,.. . --37,. _ "% , .IP . /8 M 'Q' U S R - SCSa OO- V • C R 32 • • • L 831037 J FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-890 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 23, 1989 NAME: Kent Pollard REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (up to 150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32 and east of Weld County Road 49 LAND USE: N Oil and gas production, nonproductive farmground E Nonproductive farmground S Weld County Road 32, turkey farm W Weld County Road 49, 4 residences, nonproductive farmground ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Access is proposed to this parcel from Weld County Road 49, a paved road. The property is currently not productive and is relatively flat in the southwest portion. There are some hills on the property to the north and east of the proposed kennels. Part of the northeast quarter of this section contains a large cattle livestock confinement operation permitted for up to 22,000 head of cattle. This Special Use permit is approximately .5 miles from the proposed location of the kennels. n 7 �� u ` BY iL L! I ) Lanell J. Furry /� Current Planner S31037 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Kent Pollard CASE NUMBER: USR-890 REFERRALS SENT: August 23, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 6, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton _Extension Service Dacono _Emergency Management Office _Eaton Sheriff's Office _Erie X Engineering _Evans _Housing Authority _Firestone Airport Authority _Fort Lupton. _Building Inspection _Frederick _Garden _City STATE _Gilcrest X Division of Water Resources Greeley_ _Geological Survey _Grover _ _ Department of Health Hudson _ _ Highway Department Johnstown _ _ Historical Society Reenesburg Water Conservation Board _Kersey 'f X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle __Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont_ _Ault F-1 Mead_ _Berthoud F-2 Milliken Brighton F-3 _New Raymer _Dacono F-19 Nunn_ _Eaton F-4 _Platteville _Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 _Windsor _Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES / X La Salle F-9 _Adams _ _ Longmont F-10 Boulder _Milliken F-11 Larimer _Nunn F-12 Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES X Platte Valley F-14 US Army Corp of Engineers _Poudre Valley F-15 v X USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Rayner _Federal Aviation Administration _Southeast Weld F-16 _Federal Communication Commission _WindsoriSeverance F-17 _Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS X Brighton OTHER Fort Collins _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. _Longmont X Humane Society of Weld County West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Ann Garrison 891937 DEPART?' NT OF PLANNING SERVICES ; t1 PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 915 10th STREET ril[E + 1II! ^^ ��J ' C i} �rKt GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 61 IJ ��I U1`v .. i( " I' grp S 1989 I ;l 'geld Co. Plume4 innlN 'm. • CASE NUMBER USR-890 COLORADO August 23, 1989 TO WHGN IT MAY CCNCERN: Enclosed is an application from Kent Pollard for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of lad is described as the S1:1 of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of laud for which this application has been submitted is north of Weld County Road 32 and east of Weld County Road 49. 'This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 6, 1989, so that we may give full consideration tc your recommendation. Please call Lar.ell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not h..ve a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ✓ We have reviewed the requeqst apd find no conflicts with ot_r interests, wk,8k a I....;Nrd -}c .u4.r+es».e cf-e+ -}{ke Av.,,;,,p wel-C.e. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Pleas refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: t.Lx,.+r{ Agency: U.S- LE'Pp. cc 4,2,cuaT. e_ — QN MRL CA¢e W Es-re-12.Q SE croe. Date: `j °t5'$0 11/44, orJ P..JE. $ + fE G SikCAA. .Ecre CA ctS8z7 331037 DEPARTNnIT OF PLANNING SERVICES 41,1if, PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 Willie CASE NUMBER USR-890 COLORADO August 23, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CCNCERN: Enclosed is an application from Kent Pollard for a Site Specific Developmert Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as the St:1 of Secticn 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of Weld County Road 32 and east of Weld County Road 49. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 6, 1989, so that we may give full consideration tc your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Curry, _Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our addrese listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not L..ve a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our tour for the following reasons: A 3. K We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with ctr interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the the enclosed letter. / /�) Signed: ;CLc.t Z—al-1 Agency: L -C`/P /T e l , s/. Date: Y07.7 ,., , -r ;,r € 91037 , DEPARTMr 7F PLANNING SERVICES 4s1 .„,_( PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 915 10th STREET 1 RECEIVED OREELEY,COLORADO 80631 AUG 2 4 1989 WI e ©LO.O,L&GAS CONS.COMIC asE NUMBER USR-89O COLORADO ors August 23, 1989 t AUG 2 8 t989 TO WHOM IT MAY CCNCERN: Weld CO. Plamuue „nmetlSto Enclosed is an application from Kent Pollard for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (150 dogs) in the A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is 4escribed as the Sk} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of Weld County Road 32 and east of Weld County Road 49. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by September 6, 1989, so that we may give full considetation tc your recommendation. Please call Lar.ell J. Curry, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request _ (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: • 3. X We have reviewed the re uest and, find no con li is with ot.roj interests. xe J. .t h.» '� e � • �✓� e1A:r, cr�v ea pc&i " o-n 4. A formal reccmmendat on i under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 1/4) 1 t ate✓ �4�r�G(� Agency: ad) L3 J ttaau.. zc.v enWIPIAGIAle Date: (kk �lir 16- )gh(9, 831037 ' .0 3 EAST w Z N - a Y < w N W a 0 u 0 z^ 0 I ua ? u z w w a f NIS chi 1n W ZN O 4 Z I ) Z - u W a - Z TTT w a ¢ J fJ W Oa - J Sr z 1,14 vs¢^IC W O • T U 1 } ti Tr el W ;NN a r� '� W a T W • a n F 2 N Tu a - y- a I/1 N yWI N z CO .C 1 F a W 1 Q¢ JO `S(� O ' WUU li - • W O^ W2 !� Q 0. J td u it. TA N Nel m U O R • . 0 O in N • N ` h� W 3, I/ j O• j` c I- 04M o O v1 jt n W in a m >- 0 T ry aW p 5zj W (o _h n W • coo •, a N FFW SirC ¢� (1�2 O V ,152 W F 44W» C N r .. . ? Q W ₹ - yq N J a F Q ii fll IL m g N , P ZQ Z p 6.- 'Wk./ O W= 6 ¢ • ¢ a N C-;:in Z F ' W T W W O r CL!l'l a z F F O m O .e , i a W W • WU _. a I AA x.1.1 u afl 8 ^ V, V '- [1N r • w • NI w ¢ _ • rc • a a a a O N 1~I a r o m u --, • e a W Z a • W • a 2 • a a ¢ 2 or. m ¢a o ¢J Q W O a W yN MI Y 4 Y U ti i 44� m w m a a¢ 0 _ -� ¢ 'n W ¢W N ¢ w�y� ¢ •▪ ue1� Km• 03 d 8 aa CO II% In R ` O Y Ym YI Y ¢ • Qa 8 W a¢• U ¢ 0 0 46 m CC m t7 Q in II r'l ¢ ~ J'}M ¢ U p 0 = m R W Q o_ 3� m n z 'do _ _z Viu 8 _.... C1 u m �� B a •$ r z • � , a Y ¢ is E E f wy 1 w IQz.p yyi Q O a F • W W H II ... 9 W Y •~ a C w ¢ • O- • • O o O pSc. u • 9 ¢ ' a �i yz ' In i "_ Y� m 3 m4 CO o N 1 '� 'fm ix .4 due a !'� _ �R m 1.1 gi CE' •(C..�_.6da n • O m �w 6. 2' m ¢a f I I si a • 4Q Q et ii n ; ffo aa a l I n 4. I I c _. 1-S31* •v4.. \.I l.3...�✓W I^�`� '. u DEPART(' IT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 -915 10th STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO August 29, 1989 Yr. Kent Pollard 4350 Harback Mile Road Bennett, CO 80102 Subject: USR-8S0 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyhound kennel (up to 150 dogs) in the Agricultural zone distract on a parcel of land described as the SW} of Section 18, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Pollard: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present tine. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission or. Tuesday, September 15, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. This meeting will take place iu the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commissiun members might have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to September 6, 1989, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to he posted on the site no later than September 8, 1989. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recorm;endation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, 647 Lanell J. Curry Current Planner 891037 LJC:rjg 2ddg- ≥ _ .. C4h .I ',vnUnft STEWART TITLE OF GREELEY (3031 3524571 916 10th Sveet Greeley,Colorado 80631 1 }MINERAL INTEREST WEST GREELEY FARMS, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, ADDRESS 2535-22nd STREET, GREELEY CO 80631 2 } MINERALS INTEREST--ROSE HERMAN OIL & GAS LEASE RECORDED 5-21-70, FROM ROSE HERMAN, ADDRESS 1727-20TH AVENUE, GREELEY CO TO T.S. PACE 3 OIL & GAS LEASE RECORDED 3-21-70, FROM ROTHE BROS. , INC. TO T.S. PACE 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PRODUCTION FILED NOVEMBER 18, 1971, RECEPTION NO. 1578845, EXTEND TERM OF 0 & G LEASE FILED 3-31-70, RECEPTION NO. 1544561 5 AFFIDAVIT OF PRODUCTION FILED NOVEMBER 18TH 1971, RECEPTION NO. 1578846, EXTENDS TERM OF 0 & G LEASE 5-21-70, RECEPTION NO. 1547754 S31337 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS KENT POLLARD USR-890 Everett A. & Leona M. Milberger 7203 East 87th Street Kansas City, MO 64138 -Dine and Walter Petrikat 2904 East 116 Place Thornton, CO 80233 Beatrice and Christobal Solano 15097 Weld County Road 49 LaSalle, CO 80645 Genevieve and Kenneth Thompson 15077 Weld County Road 49 LaSalle, c0 80645 Brenda and Darrell Brasier 15027 Weld County Road 49 LaSalle, CO 80645 Linda and Patrick Traurig 14687 Weld County Road 49 LaSalle, CO 80645 Eleonore and Ed Hodges 1795 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Mile high Turkey Hatchery, Inc. 711 South Bowen Street Longmont, CO 80501 Mildred W. and Leonard Jchnson 15417 Weld County Road 49 LaSalle, CO 80645 Owl Canyon Limited Partnership P.O. BOX 2263 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Courtney Monaghen 15601 Weld County Road 49 La Salle, CO 80645 891037 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County In the case #USR-890 for Kent Pollard in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed un the attached list. This 25th day of August, 1989. TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 19, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commis- sioners' Hearing Room, firet floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: USR-890 APPLICANT: Kent Pollard REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a greyound kennel (150 dogs) in the Agricultural zone district. LEGAL: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32 and east of Weld County Road 49. For more information call Lanell Z. Curry, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, £xt. 4400 891037 DEPARTMCNT OF PLANNING SERVICES s PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400 915 10th STREET t GREELEY,COLORADO 60631 wiik COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will bold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 19, 1989, at 1 :30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special review permit for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vetted property right pursuant to Colorado Law. APPLICANT: Kent Pollard LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} of Section 18, T3N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: A greyhound dog kennel (150 dogs maximum) LOCATION: North of Weld County Road 32, east of Weld County Road 49 SIZE: 160 acres, more or less The public hearing will be held in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 8C631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on September 19, 1989. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Ernie Ross, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the ew News To be publishe c (1 - by Augus 24, 1989 Received by. I Date: -� 831037 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400 Case Number Date Received Application Checked by Mylar e plat u submitted Application Fee Receipt Number Recording Fee -Receipt Number TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: cw /4/ Section is? T N, R 44W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: c U9)/7 Section J ? T 3 N, R W to y Property Address (if available) PRESENT ZONE /?GkIC.ta-rucle OVERLAY ZONES 6 t,reLtLTNx_C TOTAL ACREAGE / 60 Ac g“ ES PRPROOSOIED LAND USE POSED LAND USE R4TSTNG fl0SS-f9KEn (kizid+rNG agryl-Lo0nwS U neInNGE .4 ND N4TfVE Sx14-cc /_f3Aln� SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT: Name: (saj-'rEEA_ S'FN" /1-N D C-On (1A NY Address: _2gS 1yn, 5± _ City OdeceLe Zip Home Telephone # Xs Business Telephone e # ?1, P 3S3= �Gv Name: Address: City Home Telephone # Zip Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name: LE-K)-T— PoC-C-41'// Address: G/?i5-p J#s/tnaCk mr City y s Telephone n Zip 90/02 Home Telephone 6�/N- �1/OQ Business 1{ ,$'{t-mE List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record. Name: Address: City Zip Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Sitnature: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this (nth day of Ait5u5} 19`49. . es,2.-4(0 NOTARY PUBLIC 15305 E.COLFAX AVE AURORA,COLO. 410011 My commission expires My Commission expires June 29, 1993 F391®37 Vac_ egy )27�� {J �q c 2‘1(_0,± c.to /,J/O �/�c / / • f�2Cr gv - - ?Zen,/_-a- ,AnC c� ' . Sat- -/i*a.i Cis n, yea ., �rL c` '" G. in:ra .?,Q`t,../ d _ ^^� pp. co w to . 00 eni 4'9 tt _ a a. 000 12.4 .-2 p� � l� L� (fa,- 891037 U) eag , n�_ Lm_ -a € - LC . -�-' �" -�—, of f ay.,e -) _ate_ it "7- t� a .c .c0.,,,,2�-t-r. eC• t . .��. /�•�.-.G, ter. _rye�� o c� GLo7r, � Ci /<e- iz.e C ""9_ �-,7 /G O 42-c -- r--et _ z.v_- n' - -fa- 11'4, e. �„c�G�.0 �_ q girt a,f,,1„__ reet C- / �--072 -ic ems-.4. --t.-C-e-C. 891037 o/--t,( /144,,. _ -4,-2.0., cps .- 3 S._.c 2 7 . //��u//�r,.v- -.�// /_-�-- , e- c.... Ht a - .� . .,,--Sa ��, �. (4C - T2nnc rR19-mE n) EAR$ H 0OSE ,5"r4g-r op P6kroo -TN THE SeRCN6 or go, II it I KENNEL 114005 n/o,l I} mE kE& eL µDOSE No ptssxscy y ye/4-RS keNNEL HoosE No. 3 OrHE& 2qr or, - A. MIKN.TNE .SHOP AccotDING- TO THE 5cacce-SS br 3 KrrcµaN To mi,r Fceo THE D u arm css . C. BARN 1 0,t Lit)csroc.k 891037 mat- as GC< ar24..S, a a-.,�,e 12_—t � it)u'.C- `�"`-4 Lt� II-i�� fl ' d. „1- C- ette.c-. LILA- -u 2-i ..ct -47 c� �, ✓,U c a,Ea v its,�-catn..L 02,4:&v � i4e- 6-ta Ci is e et)A. cl v-e- � � .4-Ae_ • etie ,/go Gam- -447 891037 • r the printed—portions of this form approved by the Colorado Real Estate Commission(SC 26.2.51) THIS IS A LEGAL INSTRUMENT.IF NOT UNDERSTOOD,LEGAL,TAX OA OTHER COUNSEL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE SIGNING. VACANT LAND CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE (Seller's remedy limited to Liquidated Damages) August 1 , 1. The undersigned agent hereby acknowledges having received from Kent E . Pollard and or Assigns _.._the sum Of 5 , 000 • 00 ,in the form of_ check to be held by Austin & Austin broker, in broker's escrow or trustee account, as earnest money and part payment for the following described real estate in the County of..._Weld ,Colorado,to wit: SW 1/4 , S18 , T3N, R614, W of the 6th P .M. together with all easements and rights of way appurtenant thereto, all improvements thereon and all fixtures of a permanent nature currently on the premises except as herei miter provided, in their present condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted,and hereinafter called t he Property. 2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 17,the undersigned person(s) Kent E. Pollard and or Assigns (us joint tenants/tenants in common),hereinafter called Purchaser,hereby agrees to buy the Property,and the undersigned owner(s),hereinafter called Seller,hereby agrees ; to sell the Property upon the terms and conditions stated herein. 3. The purchase price shall be U.S.$.25-, Q0Q_• 00—•,payable as follows:$ ' 000 • 0Q__hereby receipted for, The $25 , 000 .00 inclusive of the aforementioned earnest money shall be certified funds and paid at time of closing. • i 4. Price to include: N/A and the following water rights: N/A I E if., ' 11........l by Put J........ f,..t....6Hir.t_.... , t, . -Uy(x�'I app y 'such loan,(b)execute all documents and furnish all information and documents required by the le ,and (c)pay the cus ry costs of obtaining such loan.Then if such loan is nut approved on or before—.. _. 19_,or if so approver 's not available at time of closing,this contract shall be null a )d and all 6 payments and things of value received hereunr • all be returned to Purchaser. 6. If a note and trust deed or mortga 's to be assumed, Purcl agrees to apply for a loan assumption if required and agrees to pay(1)a loan transfer fee no a ceo and(2)an interest rate not to exceed %per annum.11th to umed has provisions for a shared equity or variable interest rates or variable payments, thi ract is conditioned upot chaser reviewing and consenting to such provisions. If the lender's cons a loan assumption is required,this contra conditioned upon obtaining such consent without chan e terms and conditions of such loan except as herein provi e . 7. If a no u be made payable to Seiler as partial or full payment of the purchase price,th 6t1 trove shall shall not 1 be a a le by Purchaser without written consent of Seller.0. • Co.,t any .,,.,,.o:osFf.,. I..attrsry.etws t..Lt .AA,e: .c2 at,/ )'.all 6e.-,uiJ bS • it M(y No.SC 26-2-81. CONTRACT it)BUY ANDSELLREAL ESTATE(Vomit Lend) 891®3 ' Hodfor314ib!shjny.$62S W o'h A•v-,I v...., i)8o114 411)]L1-6'xe) • 9. it,,_abet.„,‘t .t..f b:Nc is 6643 Property,ser'i' '1 '43 d"'.,,,u' a current commitment for title insurance policy in an amount equal to the purchase price, at Seller's ..,,ti.... ....d expense, shall be furnished to Purchaser on or before August 15 ,1J_89.)ra' _ i �,f .• :a.:,t, ..,.....�..............:........t,Seller will deliver the title insurance policy to Purchaser after closing and pay the premium thereon. 10. The date of closing shall be the date for delivery of deed as provided in paragraph 11.The hour and place of closing shall be as designated by mutual agreement 11. Title shall be merchantable in Seller,except as stated in this paragraph and in paragraphs 12 and 13.Subject to payment or tender as above provided and compliance by Purchaser with the other terms and provisions hereof, I Seller shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient geIler al—____ warranty deed to Purchaser on October 26 , , 19 $9,or,by mutual agreement,at an earlier date,conveying the Property free and clear of all taxes,except the general taxes for the year of closing,and♦..v.i.o t —_ free and clear of all liens for special improvements installed as of the date of Purchaser's signature hereon,whether assessed or not;free and clear of all liens and encumbrances -... p' except the following restrictive covenants which do not contain a right of reverter:thOSe of record and except the following specific recorded and/or apparent easements: those of record and subject to building and zoning regulations. 12. Except as stated in paragraphs 11 and 13,if title is not merchantable and written notice of defect(s)is given by Purchaser or Purchaser's agent to Seller or Seller's agent on or before date of closing, Seller shall use reasonable effort to correct said defect(s) prior to date of closing. If Seller is unable to correct said defect(s)on or before date of closing, at Seller's option and upon written notice to Purchaser or Purchaser's agent on or before date of closing,the date of closing shall be extended thirty days for the purpose of correcting said defect(s).Except as stated in paragraph 13,if title is not rendered merchantable as provided in this paragraph 12,at Purchaser's option,this contract shall be void and of no effect and each party hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder and all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser. 13. Any encumbrance required to be paid may be paid at the time of settlement from the proceeds of this I transaction or fro any other source. Provided, however, at the option of either party, if the total indebtedness • secured by liens on the Property exceeds the purchase fail e,thk contract shall be void and of no effect and each party I hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder and all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser. 14. General taxes for the year of closing, based on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment, prepaid I rents,water rents,sewer rents,FHA mortgage insurance premiums and interest on encumbrances,if any,and_ shall be apportioned to date of delivery of deed. �I 15. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser on date of delivery of deed . H subject to the following leases or tenancies: none 16. In the event the Property is substantially damaged by fire, flood or other casualty between the date of this contract and the date of delivery of deed, Purchaser may elect to terminate this contract;in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser. 17. Time is of the essence hereof.If any note or check received as earnest money hereunder or any other payment due hereunder is not paid, honored or tendered when due,or if any other obligation hereunder is not performed as herein provided,there shall be the following remedies: (a) IF PURCHASER IS IN DEFAULT, then all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be forfeited by Purchaser and retained on behalf of Seller and both parties shall thereafter be released from all obligations hereunder. It is agreed that such payments and things of value are LIQUIDATED DAMAGES and (except as provided in subparagraph (c)) are the SELLER'S SOLE AND ONLY REMEDY for the Purchaser's failure to perform the obligations of this contract. Seller expressly waives the remedies of specific performance and additional damages. (b) IF SELLER IS IN DEFAULT,(1) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as terminated,in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser and Purchaser may recover such damages as may be proper,or(2) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damages,or both. (c) Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, in the event of any litigation arising out of this contract,the court may award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expense,including attorneys'fees, 18. Purchaser and Seller agree that,in the event of any controversy regarding the earnest money held by broker, unless mutual written instruction is received by broker,broker shall not be required to take any action but may await any proceeding,or at broker's option and discretion,may interplead any moneys or things of value into court and may recover court costs and reasonable attorneys'fees. 391037 19. Additional provisions: A. Purchase price shall include 5-0% of Sellers interest in any oil , gas , or other hydro-carbons and 100% of Sellers interest in all sated and gravel appurtenant to the subject property. B. This contract shall be contingent upon Purchaser securing a special use permit from the Weld County Planning Department on -or before October 20 , 1989 . If said permit is denied this contract shall become null and void and of no further force and effect and Purchasers earnest money shall be returned . C. If Purchasers are not satisfied that they can obtain a well permit for the future uses on the subject property on or before September 15 , 1989, this contract shall become null and void and Purchasers earnest money shall be returned. D. Purchaser hereby acknowledges that Orr Land Company and Austin and Austin and their agents are agents for the Seller and are not representing Purchaser in the transaction . It is our policy, however , to serve the Purchaser in a fair , honest , and forthright manner , using good business practices to effect a fair and equitable transaction . 20. If this proposal is accepted by Seller in writing and Purchaser receives notice of such acceptance on or before August 2 , , 19 A9 , this instrument shall become a contract between Seller and Purchaser and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs,successors and assigns/ of such parties,except as stated in paragraph 7. 7 II ir, Po t E. Pn -ard uci Orr Land Company -- By:._. R t.�l � AA - Purehuxer ii«• Purchaser's Address 4350 harback Mile Rd . Bennett, CO 80102 (The following section to be completed by eller and Listing Agent) 21. Seller accepts the above proposal this -day of __CZ , 19 nd agrees to pay a commission of %of the purchase price for services in this transaction,and agrees that,in the event of forfeiture of payments and things of value received hereunder, such payments and things of value shall be divided between I'sting broker and Seller,one-half thereof to said broker, but not to exceed the commission, and the balance t elle �y C ti V ( 1/6- ' Ile Seller's Address _ Listing Broker's Name and Address 891337 11 ;r AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property SW //V sit %,3/✓ i' foy, GIJ Oc the 67+k JM SATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF WELD IHE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge, the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property which is the subject of the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, an ownership update from a title or abstract company, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within 30 days of the application submission date. >y'reC-.n--19 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this Itch day AUcvsk , 19 `n , by . P01\cry\ WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires:t% y Commission expires June 29, 1992 Notary Public 15305 E.COlFAX AVE AURORA,CO1O. 80011 891037 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION /t /, EVtREIT A. LEo.vA_ rn miu3cRIreiC 1203_F- 87 Sr lc-Anis/ls Gins. , Mo . 101/38 /aid /3 y o/ ooh_ .7. Dimue 3 WMLr�e FErt tuft ,29b47 f. //b PL 7HoRNT0A/ e0. 80233 /2 / 3 ,3 Uo/ oo7 S. '3ER-7-nee c H, icraene SotnN0 /Sof? uiEco CO. 1P. `!9 y, /_Lt Sg«c Co. 806, c's # fp/ 3/ 34O/ 008 CEN,4VSEUE XENNEri-t -MOMp$'OMJ /SO'J'7 112A-co Co LP qq 1.4 5j9a - Co. Rob'S *-/a/ y/ ? '-/o/ o/.z ARENOI? OAnELl BR*SZER /So? 7 LOEID C o. R.D 9 SA-LL6 CD SO6yr Ml3/34/o/O// b. GE Nil ale v6 ( ICE NAIErg 7710,rnfsoN /.5077 WELL O. ttL/9 0gs/flee Co. goG ys` # /0/3/3 40/0/41 7 b/eENoft 9 D9-1RELL Aessre2 /5-oa'I 'Pew Ca Po. 4/9 ' Z4-SALL.6 C_o. 30&yc - /A/ 313 yo/o/n ttvo # f4rncx /4/617 ltEL.a co. ,R o. 4/9 p\' G454 # Oy LcC CO. S'ObT3 /,/yagO000 9: ELEQl/oKEgtE_ D /eo06C_S 1o79s_luEco Co. x'. 0. '7 f/a2/S / ?O 000 /Q Lo/v6 /noNT Co: F0.5-0/ /6 /Y/IL E .Xc/_t ta.''ge- y /l n-rci#n y 27/ S. Bowe-iv ,s ,' Lew owT Co. gas-o/ /9/579D000 // 11. /vT, () FD CO it D JOtfNSoN , /Sit 117 lt'ELD Co. R D 't`l. LAtSAALLE Co. ? o( y6- 7* /07 /3 otf 0 / 0 /3 891037 dt /6Q/5 -1g-0O06O7 owl Canyon LT.O Qrinevship �D . B d243 /a15-i8-o-o0 - Oo8 Gco1 C'a�o., Eri0 Atritievi49 AD . Igo/ zzO' 3 X077- ( lips Lao 165- (9,- O / 5 (0O/ Gve n L--l9 Lr4Sq «er moo . YoLv5--- • /,2_ /3 / 3 / d/oo3 i S91037 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/DR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property SW/4 I R — STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names -appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of Accost , 1984 WITNESS my hand and official seal . My Commission expires : 1_42S 42_Q p A. ..EA4,, Notary Pub is 891037 ;LOLOGICAL SU-RVEY 533^""E. R. �5 W KEe ESaua 3 MI d I i __ —_�,_ =u s J. R 64 W_ s35 35' X36 socc 7 nr 1 i/ mJ 476 fvnf Ev vl�. > o t)11 j r p95 �_�'_ "��9 __ 4)66 _ _ _ 4 _I - �' 4815 4727 y O L 3 i /5 --,, I 7/ .) , /- a , T_ 4eez w. amet- �, �� 4735 _.. I ((�_- -- 'A; faepsa .I a>a $ a W nemlu nz t-.))/ r ), • o �\ C\ '4.'8 .8\_ C\.: / +dll r 1 ` I % -`-'.0.,,, .0 _ _ 47155 __ 474(1 / $ S VI Well 474] I/1 �L ` n°er'J Q,l,,,. f ) I / / 7117 0 �N. / /.,1 a r JE�Tp S� .p„,„ i -1 �ONAG. V� �/')C �9�� 4734 f o ) �� • jL� � �� a Well 1 V�\ ill cl4Soa c) \`y1 t I)--)} 753 47 i A y Well•1 '850 •:TR \ . //)- jl ? 476- �,� ran 1 p /\ ` •� "" \\\\ � vi \ ' \ v4 TM J�o V A . I 4809 - . ilii �_ 4 N'; .J6s 1. _. W nom_ Well 4>se'/ (�" I 'r' i `I �_..S 4761�.� a �1 �ti ri. N if ' "k� a ' I 0-S? f, ��1) I C.�� I�TG E 'Not ,<:•, �_ �� ;�/ l` r 3 a �� ) i �� L J 2� > Windmill i !� G^I o 4779 1 0 Q �I — O ♦ 95 • 1'4768 aWell J ! 1 tJ �, 19 / onl i � .17 1 v. 1 1 ci ) \ Si j 4 \ / ) ) r--N_-N_ , 0 , \ 1 \ , . _ 3 '4844 �j �— \\ 4l V � )6 194 \ Q+\ _ �i_E' �� 1�4 .) 0 CiNN.H, :::i..„...,.:I ( r I) \ O.........). I 1 ' \' I / Winjmill ( t if .>s.° O 0 u 1 loF'U6 /Vi 'µ pH dr -)V'ci--inr_ i.,-n- vn .n — (TED STATES NT OF THE INTERIOR )GICAL SURVEY 533°0ft E. R.Br4 W. - KE£NESaURG l3 Ml. _ - - 5064 'SE ll ( (s39 \` \0 1 _ - _ _. - I 1 ^� _ - 39 a96 - - rvacper VIEW sc.«ooi _ l `� - \ \� s Wn'ymillti.7b 1' J _ —F___ 4850 __ _ 4766 1M �� _-v-� Wei_4)15 _/ 4]Z ci vli-s0j d _ y ., O c--c ci el, v \\_, ► b C --\ ). ; �C 484: I w gamily l :PC 48096 �, � 47 6 Windmill )31.�\'. �; 8 4)35 f>--a o RK , .l s>.9G Well $b �� W;l !. 48/8 �J 47.5 a Well. 4743 v � 4740V it v 'SI�Vi hbq - .:1 rie V l`�' i R 61 413p1 n 4eoaj 0 `\ l r di �01 4)38 9 O m� P Q :::.? 1 _ �� U Q a well v\ 1)2 I �© I Q f) 4)53 4 1�_ n b � �PS© O �Vh? i ,4c, >SG b VV rvr Well. � (, DSO 0 ' (J 4)600 �' ie13 1C�. I o © " BM ___..7-' d ipill ,% \/ fit• 4765 I Well, Well,; 4)58;' ,� c ;Q 4809 O o 476/ I. ��•l+ \/ II 4380 // ile -(�- e fY \ . ��\ Q / Cam° �r X49 , \` \.ctr Windmill �� ©( r'l (.% G.—.1 64))5 JO 2l _)Q 4 95 I ZJ � M �� D �O o J 0 /^\ ' \ ©� ' )eb 4� C../ \, _1 47)0 \ Goo $ �. I f l �1 ( / \ 084<J - 478 `/ 4 B, \ \UJ J + n780 4Tse ndm r `\4)J66 1 O I J ( ` I a�O 0 Qm•. o 891037 O `, n N ry �/1�.7 ♦�i'.i � 'Y D O.` in n P .. t . 1 + - r.n o N� { 0 N. N D f ^ + on m. Foe r.r', O n • m • y N n N O N n N . • t� TO . .X..J.:. m �W W N. �' a Uy my.m ^ T-- -4-, }.^ -P:. P n 0 Ct- K:.. -` ` P n .X.4D . e g Z ry n nY 7 F - "'fin S. n .. •i Q N ;. •lV^ P 4 ._M/ n Z g 1[I S :n f. o g Z ON. a e 7 n n g 13340000EE I • 891037 44 SOIL SURVEY to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is too low to make beneficial use of fertilizer. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Su Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. The potential native vegetation is dominated by Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. bluestem, sideoats grama, sand reedgrass, blue gi The potential native vegetation is dominated by hairy grama, switchgrass, and needleandthread. Pot( western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also production ranges from 700 pounds per acre in favo present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds years to 200 pounds in unfavorable years. As range c per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable tion deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses decrease, years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- grama and hairy grama increase, and forage produ falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- drops. vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation should be based on t: Management of vegetation on this soil should be based half or less of the total annual production. Deferred on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- ing is practical in improving range condition. Seeding tion. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding is desirable mechanical treatment are impractical. if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally not suited to these soils. Onsite investigation is need blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- determine if plantings are feasible. ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- Wildlife populations are limited because the nece: ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm habitat elements are lacking. Because most of the aer sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared is rangeland, only rangeland wildlife, for example si - quail and antelope, are typical. Extreme care is need. seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most success- . managing livestock grazing in order to provide sui: Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and habitat on these soils. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Potential is poor for urban and recreational devi ment. The chief limiting soil features are the loose, cc suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing textured soil, steep slopes, and rapid permeability. C vegetation should be continued for as many years as possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and bility subclass VIIs irrigated, VIIs nonirrigated; Gi have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Breaks range site. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and 69—Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a c hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, excessively drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,61 5,100 lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. feet It formed in eolian deposits. Include, Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The mapping are small areas of soils that have lime with cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked depth of 40 inches. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can Typically the surface layer is brown sand aba inches thick. The underlying material to a depth o be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- inches is brown sand. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Permeability moderate. h is Available inche: ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. 0 The effective rooting depth e is 60 inches land wildlife, for example, the lop Range- more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion bazar p pronghorn antelope, can be low. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, This soil is suited to limited cropping. Inten managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The crop This soil has poor potential for urban and recreational system should be limited to such close grown crops a: development. Slow permeability and high shrink swell falfa, wheat, and barley. The soil also is suited tc I cause problems in dwelling and road construction. Capa- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 t l bility subclass IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Clayey years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and s Plains range site. grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. 68—Ustic Torriorthents, moderately steep. These are Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinkers can be t deep, excessively drained soils on terrace breaks and in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or sr escarpments at elevations of 4,450 to 5,100 feet. They klers should be used for new crops. Applications of formed in gravelly alluvium and have slopes of 9 to 25 nyard manure and commercial fertilizer help to main percent. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that good production. -have pockets of sandy loam and loam in the underlying The potential vegetation is dominated by material. bluestem, sand reedgrass, Typically the surface layer is et' switchgrass, sideoats gr� y pale brown gravelly sand needleandthread, little bluestem, and blue grama. Po about 10 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth tial production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre of 60 inches is pale brown gravelly sand. - favorable years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. 891037 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART -45 range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, The potential vegetation is dominated by sand switchgrass, sand reedgrass, sideoats grama, and little bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and sand needleandthread, little bluestem, and blue grama. Poten- sage increases. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade tial production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre in and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition favorable years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As becomes poorer. range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, Management of vegetation on this soil should be based switchgrass, sand reedgrass, sideoats grama, and little on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and sand tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. sage increases. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, indiangrass, switchgrass, and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition sideoats grama, little bluestem, and blue grama are suita- becomes poorer. ble for seeding. Because this soil is susceptible to soil Management of vegetation on this soil should be based blowing, it should be seeded using an interseeder, or the on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- seed should be drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Brush Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, indiangrass, switchgrass, management also can help in improving deteriorated side-oats grama, little bluestem, and blue grama are suita- range. ble for seeding. Because this soil is susceptible to soil Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well blowing, it should be seeded using an interseeder or the suited to this soil. Blowing sand and the moderate availa- seed should be drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. ble water capacity are the principal hazards in establish- Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Brush ing trees and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees should management can also help in improving deteriorated be planted in shallow furrows, maintaining vegetation range. between the rows. Supplemental irrigation is needed to Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have good not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, determine if plantings are feasible. ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs best suited Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Ran- are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian peashrub. geland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The be attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can This soil has fair potential for urban development. The -be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape chief limiting soil features are the rapid permeability and cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- the susceptibility to soil blowing. Septic tank absorption tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- fields function properly, but in places the sandy sub- ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- stratum does not properly filter the leachate. Sewage land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be lagoons must be sealed. Once established, lawns, shrubs, attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, and trees grow well. Capability subclass VIe irrigated, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. VIe nonirrigated; Deep Sand range site. This soil has fair potential for urban development. The 71—Valent-Loup complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes. This primary limiting soil features are the rapid permeability level to moderately sloping map unit occupies hills, ridges, and the susceptibility to soil blowing. Septic tank absorp- and depression or pothole-like areas in the sandhills at tion fields function properly, but in places the sandy sub- elevations of 4,670 to 4,700 feet. The Valent soil makes up stratum does not properly filter the leachate. Sewage about 60 percent of the unit, the Loup soil about 35 per- lagoons must be sealed. Once established, the lawns, cent. About 5 percent is dune sand. The Valent soil occu- shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass IVe ir- pies the hills and ridges and the Loup soil the depressions rigated, VIe nonirrigated; Deep Sand range site. or potholes. 70—Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep, The Valent soil is deep and excessively drained. It excessively drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,650 to formed in eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is 5,100 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in brown sand about 8 inches thick. The underlying material mapping are small areas of soils that have lime within a to a depth of 60 inches is brown sand. depth of 40 inches. Also included are small areas of soils Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is that have sandstone between 40 and 60 inches. moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or Typically the surface layer of the Valent soil is brown more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is sand about 6 inches thick. The underlying material to a low. depth of 60 inches is brown sand. The Loup soil is deep and poorly drained. It formed in Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is sandy alluvium. Typically the surface layer is very dark moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or grayish brown, mottled loamy sand about 16 inches thick. more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is The underlying material to a depth of 60 inches is light low• brownish gray, mottled loamy sand and sandy loam. 891037 46 SOIL SURVEY Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 16 inches ti moderate. A water table is at or near the surface in The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam. spring and about 36 inches below the surface in fall. Sur- Permeability is moderately rapid. Available 1. face runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is This unit is used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. The inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erc potential native vegetation on the Valent soil is hazard is low. dominated by sand reedgrass, sand bluestem, blue and In irrigated areas this soil is suited to the crops hairy grams, little bluestem, needleandthread, and monly grown in the area. Perennial grasses and alfall sideoats grama. Potential production ranges from 1,800 close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percet pounds per acre in favorable years to 1,400 pounds in un- the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be use favorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the sand irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, bluestem, sand reedgrass, sideoats grama, and little tour furrows, and cross slope furrows are suitable for bluestem decrease; sandhill muhly and blowout grass in- crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping crease, and forage production drops. "Blowouts" occur as lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to range condition becomes poorer. trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. C The native vegetation on the Loup soil is dominated by respond to applications of phosphorus and nitrogen. switchgrass, little bluestem, sand reedgrass, and western In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter w wheatgrass. Indiangrass, sand bluestem, prairie cordgrass, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is plant, slender wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, saltgrass, sedge, and winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 20 bu rush are also present. Potential production ranges from per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate 4,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to 3,000 pounds to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitat in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. switchgrass, sand bluestem, indiangrass, little bluestem, Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimu and prairie cordgrass decrease, and saltgrass, blue grama, lage are needed to control soil blowing and water er sand dropseed, sedge, and rush increase. Undesirable Terracing also may be needed to control water erosi( weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition The potential native vegetation on this range s becomes poorer. dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and Seeding with an interseeder is advisable if the range is grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats g in poor condition. Sand reedgrass, sand bluestem, sideoats and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Pot grama, switchgrass, little bluestem, indiangrass, and blue production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in n grama are suitable for seeding. Seeding early in spring ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As has proven most successful. Grazing should be light to condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reed prevent range deterioration. and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dro Wildlife is an important secondary use of this unit. On and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses the Valent soil, rangeland wildlife, for example, the the site as range condition becomes poorer. pronghorn antelope, can be attracted by developing Management of vegetation on this soil should be livestock watering facilities, managing livestock grazing, on taking half and leaving half of the total annual p and reseeding where needed. tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor cor The Loup soil, which is typically wet and produces an Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, si abundance of wetland vegetation, attracts wetland wil- grams, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and dlife species, such as mallard, teal, geese, and miscellane- wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass s, ous shorebirds. Primary management of this soil for wet- should meet the seasonal requirements of livest land wildlife includes managing livestock grazing, fencing should be drilled into a clean, firm sorghum stubb to control livestock, protecting from fire, and preventing prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has drainage. Natural wetland vegetation should be allowed most successful. to develop. Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonir- Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fail rigated; Valent soil in Choppy Sand Meadow range site, suited to this soil. Blowing sand and low available Loup soil in Sandy Meadow range site. capacity are the principal hazards in establishing 72—Vona loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees she deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on plains and planted in shallow furrows and vegetation mai high terraces at elevations of 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It between the rows. Supplemental irrigation is ne. formed in eolian or alluvial deposits. Included in mapping insure survival. Trees that are best suited and ha• are some leveled areas. Also included are small areas of survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern re soils that have a loamy substratum and some areas of ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs bes soils that are noncalcareous to a depth of 60 inches. are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian peashrub. Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish Wildlife is an important secondary use of this e brown. The upper 6 inches is loamy sand and the lower 6 cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring inches is fine sandy loam. The subsoil is brown and light pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame spe 891037 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 47 be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- -should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can he inent, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be spring has proven most successful. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed. suited to this soil. Blowing sand and low available water This soil has good potential for urban and recreational capacity are the principal hazards in establishing trees development. Once established, the lawns, shrubs, and and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees should be trees grow well. The chief limiting soil feature is the planted in shallow furrows and vegetation maintained rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed hazard of ground water contamination from sewage to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have lagoons. In places recreational development is limited by good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, western the susceptibility to soil blowing. Capability subclass Ilk redcedar, ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian 73—Vona loamy sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a peashrub. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on plains and high terraces at elevations of 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked formed in eolian or alluvial deposits. Included in mapping pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can are some leveled areas. Also included are small areas of be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- soils that have a loamy substratum and some areas of tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- soils that are noncalcareous to a depth of 60 inches. ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be brown. The upper 6 inches is loamy sand and the lower 5 inches is fine sandy loam. The subsoil is brown and light attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. yellowish brown fine sandy loam about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam. This soil has good potential for urban and recreational development. Once established, the lawns, shrubs, and Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water trees grow well. The primary limiting soil feature is the capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a hazard is low. hazard of ground water contamination from sewage lagoons. In places recreational development is limited by This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive the susceptibility to soil blowing. Capability subclass IVe cropping is hazardous because of soil blowing. The cropping system should be limited to such close grown irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. crops as alfalfa, wheat, and barley. The soil is also suited 74—Vona loamy sand, 5 to 9 percent slopes. This is a to irrigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 deep, somewhat excessively drained soil on plains at years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small elevations of 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. non- Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinklers can be have a loamy substratum and areas of soils that are used in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or calcareous Tp the urdepth e 60 inches. grayish spinklers should be used for new crops. Application of inches is the surface la and it l brown. The e barnyard manure and commercial fertilizer helps to main- 6 yloam.is loamy sand and the lower and 4 inches is fine fain good production. sandy The subsoil is brown light yellowish sub- The potential native vegetation on this range site is brown fine sandy loam about 12 inches thick. The dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue stratum Permeability to a depth of 60 inches is loamy sand. grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, tyis is t moderately rveir rooting Available water and western wheatgrass sideoats grama, capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 are also prominent. Potential inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion production.ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- hazard is low. ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range The potential native vegetation on this range site is condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential the site as range condition becomes poorer. production ranges from 2, favora- Management of vegetation on this soil should be based ble years to 1,800 rds in favor per acre in able years. range on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade grama, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested the site as range condition becomes poorer. 891037 Hello