HomeMy WebLinkAbout851460.tiff 1
RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE FUNDING APPLICATION FOR WELD COUNTY BRIDGE WEL 17/44B
AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN SAME
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board has been advised by the County Engineer
that Weld County Bridge WEL 17/44B has sustained significant
deterioration and must be replaced, and
WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable
to submit a Funding Application to Colorado Counties, Inc. , a copy
of said application being attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that submittal of a
Funding Application for the replacement of Weld County Bridge WEL
17/44B be, and hereby is, approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and
hereby is, authorized to sign said Funding Application.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 15th day of
April, A.D. , 1985.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: � �� tz.,,., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County erk and Recorder �., ,,�„
and Clerk to the Boar J• u-\ine Jo son, Chairman
V � L t
•
Gene R. Br ner, Pro-Tem
D puty County Cl k
APPR D A TO FORM: C.W. R
l /
County At orney
Fran ama chi
tir (4S) ce. 4_ , , gib / to
851460
4LSOff
• P i SPECIAL BRIDGE FUND
BRIDGE PROJECT ESTIMATE
Structure Number 17/446 County WELD
Engineering:
Preliminary Engineering $ 10,000
Design Engineering 15,000
Construction Engineering
and staking 5,000
Project Engineering 5,000
Final Inspection 1,000
TOTAL ENGINEERING COSTS: $ 36,000
Labor - Materials - Equipment: 15,000
Mobilization $
Site Preparation 40,000 (20,000 rip-rap protectic
Excavation 10,000
Abutments/Piers/Piling 40,000
Structure/Deck/Guard Rail 60,000
10,000
Approaches
3,000
Pavement
TOTAL LABOR - MATERIALS - EQUIPMENT COSTS: $ 178,000
Contingencies: $ 20,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 234,000
Date of Bid Proposal: June 1986
Project Start Date: August 1986
November 1986
Project Completion Date: /�7 �+ Novemberrr 1986
Estimate Prepared By: �� ;17 l��if? /Z! / - Civil Enoi neer II
(signa ure and title)
Approved Chairman,
Board of County Commissioners:
(signature)
NARRATIVE FOR WELD COUNTY BRIDGE WEL 17/448
Bridge structure 17/448 is located on Weld County road 17 between Weld
County roads 44 and 46 and crosses the Little Thompson River.
The sufficiency rating for this structure is 22.7 based on the latest
Structure Inventory and Appraisal Report dated April 2, 1985.
The average daily traffic was recorded from April 2, 1985 to April 4, 1985
with a count of 801.
The structure was recently rated for Type 3, Type 3S2 and Type 3-2 vehicles
at 8,8 and 9 tons respectively. Such weight limits obviously restrict the
use of the bridge by agricultural and industrial (oil and gas) traffic
in the vicinity.
Significant deterioration of the bridge has occurred due to the age
estimated at 1945. One example of deterioration is exposed and broken
rebar.
NARRATIVE FOR WELD COUNTY BRIDGE WEL 3/42A
Bridge structure 3/42A is located on Weld County road 3 between Weld County
roads 42 and 44 and crosses the Little Thompson River.
The sufficiency rating for this structure is 21.9 based on the latest
Structure Inventory and Appraisal Report dated January 17, 1985.
The bridge is rated for Type 3, Type 3S2 and Type 3-2 vehicles at
4,6 and 6 tons respectively. Agricultural and industrial (oil and gas)
traffic in the area is restricted by such low weight limits .
The structure is a one-lane bridge with a bridge roadway width of 15.7
feet. Such a narrow bridge is very restrictive.
The age of the structure has been estimated at 1935. Significant deter-
ioration has occurred including a number of cracked timber stringers and
a weakened south abutment.
/COUNTY We/e! ( )
ROAD NUMBER /2
STRUCTURE NO. /7/445
a y �^ '
r�
p.li Y; ..
ate''
Bridge 17/44B April 2, 1985 _
Looking North
ROAD VIEW: PHOIU0RAPH LOOKING No v t4
L �4
Bridge 17/44B April 2, 1985 `
Looking East
ELEVATION VIEW: PHOTOGRAPH LOOKING tee 5 f
I
State of Colorado S i r.4) Hwy. N6.1..7 '
Department of Highways /q �
Division of Highways Str. No 2!
D.O.H. Form No. 422
Rev. Aug.. 1980
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL SHEET
1 State 0 8 8 125 Administrative Jurisdiction - on 4
2 Hwy. District Eng/Maint 4L 225 Administrative Jurisdiction - under 4
3 County LI 3 26 Functional Class - on OE
4 City/Town 12 O.A2 O 226 Functional Class - under g
5 Inventory Route on 1d1000Q70 27 Year Built/Reconstruct 454
205 Inventory Route under OP.Q_ODQ OQ O 28 Lanes on and Under Structure O g.O 1
6 Feature ILtflrycLte4djff2111ni"!oN_BLJ/fl_ 29 ADT on 4/2/y5 00[1_80,
206 undeiro tl n_g ti At', 229 ADT Under QQe, o e
i 7 Facility on e o.r�r1ZY-goA p_13 30 Year of ADT on IS
Structure-
8 Structure No. „.SWWEL_12L2o_P44O5 230 Year of ADT Under 0e
9. Location- 6 9_M1_LIL 0RMM 0_E_ 31 Design Load 5
C¢_D2_44_0 _12_ 32 Appr. Rdway. Width w/Shldr. Pave L7 ` O L
10 Max. Vert. Cl. (10'-0") Lane on it,IF• 11 33 Bridge Median Open 1 None 0 Closed 2 O
j 210 Max. Vert. Cl. (10'-0") Lane under O o"'"O O 34 Skew 0 e
11 Milepoint on .000.0 0 35 Str. Flared Yes 1 no 0 1
1 211 Milepoint Under 0 00.0 O 36 Traffic Safety Features O0 QL
12 DOD Road Section No. on .0,0•20 .t 38-40 Navigation Control 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
212 DOD Road Section No. under QQOL1 X 41 Structure open or closed 8/8/9 I
13 DOD Bridge Letter on gg 42 Type Service LS
I aos
213 DOD Bridge Letter under LX 43 Structure Type COWL,. et r1 e), beak 9- ee I /0;
14 DOD Milepoint on QQ.Q& 44 Approach Span Type 001
214 DOD Milepoint under 0 0a.° 45 No. of Spans - Main e20 2
115 DOD Section Length on QQ.Q 46 No. of Spans - Approach .0Q o i
215 DOD Section Length under O 0 .0 1 47 Total Horizontal Clear. on 2 2!
116 Latitude 40jj.L 247 Total Horizontal Clear. under oO._
(17 Longitude 1044.4• 48 Maximum Span Length Ch 0.031
18 Phys. Vulnerability 2 49 Structure Length 11I2QOZ.Le
i
19 By-Pass Detour Length on Q f 50 Sidewalk le•• QQQ p..... Q6.1
219 By-Pass Detour Length under QQ 51 Bridge Roadway Width (curb to curb) . OL_2.!
;20 Toll 3 52 Deck Width (out to out) „., QL1.!
121 Custodian 3 53 Minimum Vertical Clear on Str. YQ r t'
22 Owner
54 Minimum Vertical Underclearance QO O t
i
23 FAP No. ,,QR1DGF_SUUA1EY 55 Minimum Lateral Clearance Rt. Fr", 02.,'
24 Federal Aid System on II 56 Minimum Lateral Clearance Lt. r„. _Via!
224 Federal Aid System under QQ 57 Wearing Surface s
1 of 5 ,(/-f^~"cl .: "a+�1 Date 4/L/8,-
E'c'e of Colorado
t•em.rtment of Highways I
Division of Highways Hwy. No _12Y
--
DOH. Form No. 422 St r. N- IT/295.
June, 1978 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL SHEET
STRUCTURE SKETCHES
PLAN
ELEVATION
SECTION
Comments: fee !(, P �� l/ O N AC, CI* O 54ret
ITEM 32 01 0 Regular Scheduled Inspection_E Temperature -5-CC
"[opiate McBf Special Scheduled Inspection—O" Time of Day It `OO
ITEM 36 opt? Partial Inspection O Weather Cond. Sc(NHy
(starting from left most position) 11
(1st Digit) BRIDGE RAKING -Bridge Die Type BCode — LW/ V''
ye et :/ r'rry cv ; 94 I`B4,r•
weld cc( — s'7 nU1es? mete p; e "erfs broker)
(2nd Digit) APPROACH RAIL - TRANS/T/ON N/A
a. Approach railing firmly attached to b dge railing.
b. Approach railing gradually stiffened .
c. Curbs or safety walks tapered or shielded.
d. Rail blocked away from posts.
(3rd Digit) APPROACH RAILINGS HA
a.Type
tt Location at bridge according to latest design standards
(4th Digit) APPROACH RA/L ENDS (ends away from structure) N/4
a. Flared and buried.
b. Breakaway or shielded.
INSPECTOR N n 4W. DATE 4./Z her 2of5
0 0 • r
/C^uNTr_wat_ Z--
ROAD NUMBER JTT _ _ _ +
J-) r.•
; UM'RUCTURC NUMBER 1--/- a 4{�•�/_ X
(I
WiN.JCy J, LLS ARE FL- 1
N LC
C.1 . P. CO NC_ . 0
,I I it
4 NV `, 44190° U - - - - - - -
—� - 0 0 �
�5HOULD._F I 9
PLAN
0
T 8 a t R. L _N VT1-4 D a
V "S-C)CT'Y'P)-) • 1...
2 7STL, C�1R �DR 18" r
00 _._ ../RC. SEAM -�—
Frr .0
7Q 1' 1.--Wcided q�
Fni
0 I 0 `' hi
3w � � In i 1 '`� r.
�� "�'\
a ‘'\ > i v 3O
-- — -5c0' - Uz `v— 57 ' z —(N.,—
ST L.. CLR.5PAM I .1CO1.JC.CLR. SPANIp
-
Q3Co'-10 CON C.. . 4 '38'-O 5TL. O
CL-R SPrs.N CLR . SP/s...14--.1
LONVI- 1UDINAL SECTl0N..I LOOlS1NIC... WEST
28'-Z.. m - m DECK, •
a.z; - D. F-F R/INN L✓ z.%Ja (T`A'P)
ca 1n" P.SP'HALT� fa
7.r 'rs.—
{�
z cp., VV
12? 5''S51 n \ ZZZ��f�////YYYY����''' j a-A ci ---C15 X -440
'a-10 ml= �E�J` t�j (TYP 5- Si wa
• 18" - O C-YP)
C
_ l",, a" onGTc' c.. 1PPOFCT\ti1V-
•SlateRepo of nt faH O
• 'Deportment of Highways
Division of Highways Hwy. No. e/
D.O.H. Form No. 422 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL SHEET Sty. No.
June, 1978 (INSPECTION REPORT)
-/� �
APPROACHES 2/ lir CONDITION
Material A 7 I
High or Low (Forward) Level (Rear) LC✓C / F 9
Joint Condition
Curbs
Shoulders S ti ar e v Cr a c w:k. � s f •
Remarks-
ITEM NO. 65 F
DECK J
Surface Material A f S 4a //1 on toaCve Te e ; dec.
Curbs TT _/ P
Eaponsion Joints Ho sl e -rO let/ •al: S / /t�/.t 9 ,&'o X e +/1 14
Const. Joints Fcc%• .: K beAl 4,1/l w : s F 9
Deck Condition
ITEM NO. 58 F 6
•
•
SUPERSTRUCTURE riebiif ore fi✓%•tsevc •
•
No. of Spans •Z Type Gost+4• Cot4c ea,4 v! ✓/ee
Girders (Stringers) to. e. 2/"AIL" +.u %1/r .sleet eXfi( Seatf C 2-
_04_4( -_Stet ) S- / -MCC kref estivtc ex fcrKa/ Itv/'-'v" P 4
_4- ,s /S"X JG•" Cii an.telq N
— b/ecw _Rce1 -
Yrust - Deck TimAGer -For "ova..? / {71/ iN .% P• ITEMr NO.j 59 Gr Z.
SUBSTRUCTURE //
Bearings ftoMe• /40[40frEli't--- Sf �lee� ntit t�0✓tl!✓e{e
Abutments eOKC- e SQ•N / %t-t F ..S
Piers Goo fr - /1o"t0/: /t7 :e. OHtout. - Steel p000vie" F 5
—sov91P j//a /fivtO F
Wings SW w _ ✓a _1/4vf. 'f /a/�ci1. G:/ (' pKF. ,y //h P 4•
Xi/ell - ITEM NO. 60 F
L i
STREAM BED /�
Channel Condition SOSh gaol' Main C#a_N set- /1/0vfh aye,',I'ft P 4
Channel Protection Type Na vl e
condition- �t,I Ap I__
•
Bonk Condition Ve, ec a( O.14 Jf of i'f C�� a ry'f C �OVe r�/mvJ St/frP. P 11-
Debris I /rid L O_`L�J✓ v ttnetral ct- //Wood CM t S
ii ITEM NO. 61 /CC
CULVERTS
No. of Openings Moterial_
Wings --- _
ITEM NO. 62
Remarks: rat& Pwo_/Atc_CL [y LL,, y�- N
lJG_4S/.J_.�fY� Cv
af:_Lfs_c__hate,e,! a H 6L5t acZ�1of
*CONDITION: Good-Fair-Poor Critics INSPECTOR 1j/�iWL!/ �...�fc,/ DATE
3of5
Store of Colorado
Deportment of Highways \ Hwy. No. /7/ .
Division of Highwoys JJJ Str. No. /7/4113
DO.N. Form No. 422 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL SHEET
Rev. January , 1979 (INSPECTION RE PORT)
ITEM YELLOW CARD Key Punch
NO. , Card Col. CODES
58 Deck 20 E
59 Suoerstructure 32 Z
60 Substructure 44 3
61 Channel and/or Channel Protection I 56 4
z 62 Culverts—Retaining Walls 68 11[
0
i-
0
2
0 BLUE CARD
U
63 Estimated Remaining Life 12-13 00
64 Operating Rating 667
65 Approach Alignment 25 6
66 Inventory Rating Zr7{
67 Structural Condition _ 37 Z
68 Deck Geometry 49 6
69 Undercleorance (Vertical and Lateral) 61 /✓
70 Safe Load Capacity 73 7
ct
Q
o:
a WHITE CARD
a
71 Waterway Adeauacv Ntitif L' /1Rfr1t(E/ S:fled i4. 12 4
72 Aoprnach Alignment 24 8
90 Date of Update 36-39 040211
Structure No (Item No.8) q 58-64 WEL 0/70/7.0-095110e
INSPECTOR tiL4t4( ` iga�.-s)ATE 4/t/;r
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
73 Year Needed 8T
74 Type of Service
75 Tvoe of Work • 311
76 Improvement Length p0AOB0
77 Design Loading
78 Roadway Width 4032
79 Number of Lanes O Z
80 A. D.T. /.,7440
81 Year of A D T. Ac
82 Proposed Rdwy ImorovementslYeor) 1O
83 Proposed Rdwv. Improvements(Type) 3
84 Cost of Improvements 50,000 Not;/ (thousands of dollars) 00!72
85 Preliminary Engineering (thousands of dollars) oil
86 Demolition Cost (thousands of dollars) 0071
87 Substructure Cost (thousands of dollars) O 003.7
88 Superstructure Cost Meat. Girder (thousands of dollars) 00054
4 of
"2,„„$, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
.*M PHONE(303)356-4000
aimr.O. 3OX 758
l r GREELEY,COLORADO 80632
•
COLORADO
April 10, 1985
John F. Tomsic
Colorado Counties Inc.
1177 Grant Street
Denver, CO 80203
RE: Funding Application for Weld County Bridges WEL 17/446 and WEL 3/42A
Dear Mr. Tomsic:
Weld County is applying for funding to replace bridges WEL 17/446 and
WEL 3/42A due to significant deterioration. Bridge WEL 17/446 is
priority number one and bridge WEL 3/42A is priority number two.
The replacement of these two deficient structures would greatly
benefit Weld County.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
GPs �. ,;zce
Rex L. Cantrell
Civil Engineer II
RLC/bf
Hello