HomeMy WebLinkAbout881763.tiff T DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
;, ii
f PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT. 4400
±: l 915 10th STREET
GREELEY,OOLORADO 80631
4•
A/�}y�� p,N P
COLORADO
August 26, 1988
Mr. Bill Crews
Crews and Zeren
1223 28th Avenue, Suite 2
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: USR-668
Dear Bill:
The Department of Planning Services' staff has reviewed your proposal to
move the Bragg #2 well approximately two hundred (200) feet south of the
location shown on the recorded mylar plat, and has determined that the
relocation will not be a material deviation from the plans and standards as
approved for USR-668.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely yours,: 011--a-e , ,e,2_7
-7 Lanell J. Cur' ry
Current Planner
LJC:dn
Staff Meeting 8/25/88
August 24, 1988 CREWS & ZEREN
PETROLEUM LAND CONSULTANTS
1223 26TH AVENUE, SUITE 2
Lanelle Swanson GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
Dept. of Planning Services (303)351-0733 GREELEY
Weld County (303)659-7710 DENVER
915 10th. Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Lanelle:
RE: USR-668:85:6
In the Plot Plan at the bottom of the referenced USR, the Bragg #2 wellbore
location is shown as being 1600' east of the west section line, and 700' south
of the east/west center section line.
When The Robert Gerrity Company staked the well for actual drilling under the
USR, it was found that those distances do not allow the well to be drilled,
since they are too close to the pond to allow a rig pad and drillsite area
along with the berm. It is our thought that either the plat contains an error
in these wellbore footages, or the pond is closer to the drillsite than the
plat indicates. The 1"=200' scale plan shows a distance of 100' from the
wellbore to the berm, when in fact it is right up against the area for the
berm.
The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has granted its approval for
the drilling of such well (which Gerrity intends to name as the Bragg-PM J21-
11) at a location approximately 1600' east of the west section line, and 900'
south of the east/west center section line.
This would appear not to be a material deviation, since location changes are
frequently made for topographical reasons, and the distance involved is only
200 feet. No other changes are contemplated by Gerrity.
To be on the safe side, Gerrity asks the concurrence of the planning staff
that this change of wellbore location by 200 feet to the south does not
constitute a material deviation from the USR.
Please advise me of your decision as soon as possible. If you have any
questions, please let me know.
Cordially,
f f.
William G. Crews, CPL
Attorney-in-Fact for
The Robert Gerrity Company
WW/Item
S.gr7/ 3
pLHOO
Hello