The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About880925.tiff RESOLUTION RE: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF SERVICE PLAN - GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 32-1-204 , CRS, as amended, a Service Plan concerning the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District was filed with the Weld County Board of County Commissioners , and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 32-1-108 , CRS, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners scheduled a public hearing on the Service Plan to be held at 2 : 00 p.m. on August 24, 1988 , and WHEREAS, notice of the date, time and location and purpose of said hearing was duly published in the Platteville Herald, the County legal newspaper, on August 3 , 10 , and 17, 1988 , and in the North Weld Herald, a newspaper of general circulation in the area; notice was provided to the Division of Local Affairs of the name and type of the proposed District; and notice of the date, time and location of said hearing was provided to the Petitioners , to the governing body of each municipality and of each special district which had levied an ad valorem tax within the next preceding tax year and which had boundaries within a radius of three (3) miles of the District, and to said Division , as required by Sections 32-1-202 (1) and 32-1-204 (1) , CRS, as amended, and to the Weld County Planning Commission as required by Section 32-1-204 , CRS, as amended, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Planning Commission studied and considered the Service Plan at its meeting on July 19 , 1988 , at which time said Commission adopted a Resolution recommending approval of the Service Plan for various reasons as more specifically stated therein, which recommendation was subsequently presented to the Board of County Commissioners at its hearing on this matter by a representative of said Commission, as required by Section 32-1-204 (2) , CRS, as amended, and WHEREAS, the Board did, on August 24 , 1988 , conduct a public hearing on the matter, at which time it was determined that there had been no postcard notification of the property owners within the proposed district; therefore, the Board continued said hearing, and 5 ' 880925 Page 2 RE: SERVICE PLAN - GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board did, on September 21 , 1988 , conduct a full public hearing on this matter, taking evidence establishing the jurisdiction of the Board to hear this matter and further taking evidence regarding the substantive issues set forth in Section 32-1-203 , CRS , as amended, at which hearing all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board fully considered the Service Plan and all testimony and other evidence presented to it in this matter relating to said Service Plan, including the favorable recommendation of the County Department of Planning Services, and WHEREAS , the Board, after consideration, finds that the Service Plan as modified, and the evidence and testimony presented to the Board meets the criteria contained within Section 32-1-203 , CRS, as amended, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that: Section 1 . The Board hereby determines that all of the jurisdictional and other requirements of Sections 32-1-202 and 32-1-204 , CRS, as amended, have been fulfilled, including those relating to the filing and form of the Service Plan, the form and publication of the public notice of the hearing on the Service Plan and the type of public hearing held herein, and that, pursuant to Section 32-1-204 (1 . 5) the petitioners did give proper and timely postcard notification of the hearing to the property owners within the district. Section 2 . The Weld County Planning Commission has considered this matter as required by law and has recommended approval of the Service Plan. Section 3 . That prior to a decision on the Service Plan, the Board determined that no requests for exclusion of property were submitted. Section 4 . Based upon the information contained within the Service Plan and evidence presented to the Board at the hearing, the Board hereby finds and determines as follows : a . There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized services of the nature proposed in the Service Plan in the area to be serviced by the proposed District; b. The existing services in the area to be served by the proposed District are inadequate for present and projected needs; 880925 Page 3 RE: SERVICE PLAN - GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT c. The proposed District is capable of providing economical and sufficient services to the area within its proposed boundaries; d. The area to be included within the proposed District will have the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis; e . Adequate services are not and will not be available to the area through Weld County, or other municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, including special districts, within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis; f. The facilities and service standards of the proposed District are or will be compatible with the facilities and service standards of Weld County and of each municipality and special district which is an interested party hereto; g. The Service Plan is in substantial compliance with the Weld County Master Plan; and h. The creation of the proposed District will be in the best interest of the area proposed to be served. Section 5 . The Service Plan of the proposed District, be, and hereby is , approved, subject to language being incorporated into and made a part of the Galeton Water and Sanitation District Service Plan providing that when the district is to provide water service, the Service Plan shall be amended, with the amendment to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration at its regular meeting September 28 , 1988 , at 9 :00 a.m. Section 6. The Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to advise the Petitioners in writing of this action and to attach a certified copy of this Resolution for the purpose of filing the same with the District Court of Weld County. Section 7 . All Resolutions, or parts hereof, in conflict with the provisions hereof, are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict only. Section 8 . This Resolution, immediately upon its passage, shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Board of County Commissioners and the County Clerk and Recorder and sealed with the corporate seal of the County. 880925 Page 4 RE: SERVICE PLAN - GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 21st day of September, A.D. , 1988. B 44 � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: . WE COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder 2 45 2'+'•'' and Clerk to the Board ene R. Brantner, Chairman BY: C.W.�. � Kir y, Pr -Tem Deputy ,Fount C rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J cqu nson i' Go c County OAttorneYaCt, `„ Frank Yfamaguchi 880925 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 88-47 RE: SERVICE PLAN FOR PROPOSED GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT A public hearing was conducted on September 21, 1988, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Gene Brantner, Chairman Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Pro—Tem Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Brian Bingle The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 27, 1988, and duly published August 3, 10, and 17, 1988, in the Platteville Herald, a public hearing was conducted to consider the adequacy of the Service Plan for the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record and said this hearing had been continued to this date for postcard notification to be sent to residents of the proposed district. He also noted that the proponents of the district had started their presentation at the August 24 hearing. William Warren, president of the Galeton Civic Association, came forward to answer questions of the Board. Wayne Cecil, representing his son, asked why a water district was being proposed, since most of the Galeton residents are already served by the North Weld Water District. Mr. Morrison explained that this was originally proposed as a Sanitation District, but they desired to be able to provide water also. He said the Service Plan does not address water, but the Board could determine that the addition of water would be a substantial change in the plan which would require another hearing. Elmo Peterson, engineer for the proposed district, explained why he had recommended that water be included in the district. Vern Cecil asked a number of questions about this proposal which Mr. Peterson answered. Brian Bingle, Planning Department representative, presented the favorable recommendations of the Planning staff and Planning Commission. (Tape change #88-47 during discussion) After discussion, Commissioner Johnson reviewed the criteria to be used when considering a Service Plan and moved to approve the Service Plan for the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District, with the condition that, when the District wishes to provide water service, it must amend the Service Plan and the amendment shall be considered by the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Because the Service Plan must be amended to reflect the condition contained in her motion, Commissioner Johnson moved to consider the language of said amendment at the regular Board meeting on September 28. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Lacy, carried unanimously. 880925 5� Page 2 HEARING CERTIFICATION - GALETON WATER & SANITATION DIST. SERVICE PLAN This Certification was approved on the 26th day of September, 1988. APPROVED: � , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS U(.lt'u"'e',Us ATTEST: tl WELD UDTTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder St,ft AraintS- and Clerk�tjo the Boa Gene R. Brantner, Chairman By: //LLO(�// , � X Deputy County C] k C.W. Kirby, Pro- em 'Sac.uel' ,. s -r ►ti /�J, . E. Y geffiFrank Yaidaguchi TAPE #88-46 & #88-47 DOCKET #88-47 SD0013 880925 ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name , address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOCKET # SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 DOCKET # 88-47 SERVICE PLAN - GALETON WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT DOCKET # NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING-t f'. ..7.k2i---0/ ,/,' zir Rif( : i 23,./zinc.... eich_e_f _ _ . ..., ,C.. - o Jn '-4./ rri oje. �C7/ r .1/274.',C) el IJ d 1, i;R2 }- 36c !/Ih - 4.11 illas .cam AP kri '76�- 0647,6 l© 0"c06 ) .7- _lam . -- . 3 7'67 w 13 51, 6 r 1c1 � 3-(7 (;,.3 -rte �. 9r� i (, rtez SC( zc 'Cu ✓`.1 / � '-flid„/� i, / r / , // 4.--1 r/ '/C�� /��/p 'j / .{n �� '1� / 1 'i . 3 // ,rt C an, C G of, , a ,o to U \ : l J d X V O 6`t�?e. `� c.(c rt,f_, d -vd-« 880925 Hearing Date: September 21, 1988 Time: 2:00 P.M. Location: First Floor Assembly Room Weld County Administration Building 915 Tenth Street, Centennial Center Greeley, Colorado Purpose: Public hearing on Service Plan for the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District. A copy of the Service Plan is on file for public review at the Weld County Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. Proposed Initial Mill Levy: 0.00 Mills Maximum Mill Levy: No maximum is imposed by law. 880925 ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: August 24, 1988 DOCKET 4 88-47 Service Plan - Galeton Water & Sanitation District DOCKET # 88-44 Service Plan - Fort Lupton Park and Recreation District (Cont from 8/17) • DOCKET # NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING 6 /en /i;1/ G cc./e taw g f1 - 5' 7 Na z e j /);/1 V ci.! ton b f- / 7 fJIaMM W. Witiwii (, AuJT 'ID /1 8 gy - D p t7t4. ,4 H vi dc5 a7A K _evs5.7*3n✓Pr ft. /ty too, L"n/d. t1e5p-94, ,,-1ttT/, g `4-1r i ras ( de, it 0 4 // 1 / // ft Qf ii Et[7ca E. £timwick /' ,. r"�-rr f ' Fl;- l{7 ER N657- /VA//ipp Gis-5.4e .vzer /r,Lupre, C..a1o . F - �/ 4 c . naVc £ {i �r� X00 61dia. 2.2r P-4-. / viol, CD °AN-- 4/ / /gA,h at& S eh/ /o 2 d /ri)J4'IK Hiatt!) G o ,Fr_ 7r V ,9, ,„....„... 4 7,0,--,:,3/4 4-_.9-erl7.%-%LEA, 3, 0,-(„, a„ &W.' - 5/91 I. , aik) r i,„, ,r/ ,fin -(77) - /o z L i�'�1 //�/ q r66 FY. y W 1427/1t (175Aifiejewo-4,75-6 g-2- "lot;) 174 xxreo,e,zxha tcK�/r�,f . 118T) Ca\ ckar3 ct it L I-t�.,, Y�3 - '-14WGto t G✓. -4,AL ✓ /yo / 9 s/C6 1);,/f, ,.,,_ cr,-5-""--/c/ c z iliA /a/ S. a,', Ty Lc. n--4‘Y Cti , 0 tee, , y �/.� y>�.?�N, �.�-- lc.-e-��/� .�`�. ,6/. f��z/jam ! J- -Yy /i/1 V //4 t 1k fir r G D1i / l / 5 o2/38-.L/( ( Aa . (it /ao.1 YY.ua-e f x7,4. dt,f ,41M,, C, ra 14809 - 'Iy / &' - NOTICE OF HEARING Docket No. 88-47 PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Service Plan for the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District has been filed with the County Clerk and Recorder of Weld County, Colorado. The Service Plan and related documents are now on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado, and are available for public inspection between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. , Monday through Friday. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, by Order of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, a public hearing on said Service Plan and related documents will be held in the Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at 2:00 P.M. , on Wednesday, the 24th day of August, 1988. The purpose of the hearing shall be to consider the adequacy of the Service Plan of the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District and to form a basis for adopting a Resolution approving, conditionally approving, or disapproving the Service Plan. The proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District is located entirely within Weld County, Colorado, and is described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. Pursuant to Section 32-1-202, C.R.S. , the Service Plan may not be approved if a petition objecting to the Service Plan and signed by the owners of taxable real and personal property, which property equals more than fifty percent of the total valuation for assessment of all taxable real and personal property to be included in the District, is filed with the Board of County Commissioners no later than ten days prior to the hearing, unless such property has been excluded by the Board of County Commissioners under Section 32-1-203(3.5) , C.R.S. Pursuant to Section 32-1-305(3) , C.R.S. , the owner of real property within the proposed District may file a petition with the District Court in and for Weld County, stating reasons why said property should not be included with the proposed District and requesting that such real property be excluded therefrom. Such petition shall be duly verified and shall describe the property sought to be excluded. The District Court will hear said petition and all objections thereto at the time of the hearing on the petition for organization and shall determine whether, in the best public interest, said property should be excluded or included in the proposed District. Such petition may be filed any time after the petition for the organization of the District is filed with the District Court, but not later than ten days before the day fixed for the hearing on the organizational petition. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Debbie Campbell, Deputy DATED: July 27, 1988 PUBLISHED: August 3, 10, and 17, 1988, in the Platteville Herald 880925 _ EXHIBIT "A" GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WELD COUNTY, COLORADO LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of the Northwest Quarter (NW*) of Section 5 and of the Northeast Quarter (NE}) of Section 6 of Township 6 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. and a portion of the Southeast Quarter (SE}) of Section 31 and of the Southwest Quarter (SW}) of Section 32 of Township 7 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M., all in Weld County, Colorado. The District is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section 5, which point lies 313 feet more or less East of the Northwest corner of the Section; thence South along the East line of the alley in Blocks 3, 4, and 9 of the Plat of the Town of ZITA, a distance of 925 feet, more or less; thence West 20 feet to the South— east corner of Lot 15, Block 9 of the Town of ZITA; thence South 423.7 feet; thence East 179.2 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 6; thence North along said section line 112.2 feet more or less to the South line of Fourth Street of the First Addition to the Town of ZITA. Thence, departing from said Section line, East along the South line of said Fourth Street a dis— tance of 972.6 feet more or less to the Southwest corner of the First Addition to the Town of ZITA; thence North 40 feet; thence West 250 feet; thence North 290 feet; thence East 250 feet to the West line of Grandview Avenue; thence North along said West line of Grandview Avenue 564.6 feet more or less to the Southeast corner of the Galeton Community Church property which is designated as the Galeton Park; thence West 140 feet; thence North 307.1 feet more or less to the North line of Section 6-6-64. Thence East along the said North line of Section 6, 121 feet more or less to the West line of a parcel of land in Section 31, T7N, R64W known as Weld County Parcel No. 071131000008; thence, entering Section 31, T7N, R64 West, North 170 feet; thence East 200 feet; thence North 200 feet; thence East 304 feet more or less to the West line of a par- cel owned by the Triangle Cross Ranch as shown on Weld County Recorded Ex- emption No. 0711-31-4- RE802, Recording No. 02059448. Thence North along the West line of said parcel 200 feet; thence East 508.5 feet more or less to a point on the East line of said Section 31, which point lies 570 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Section 31. Thence entering said Section 32-7-64, East 170 feet; thence Southeast 815 feet more or less to a point on the South line of Section 32-7-64 which lies 741 feet East of the Southwest section cor- ner of said Section 32; thence West 428 feet more or less to the Point of Be- ginning. APPENDIX A 880925 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 19, 1988 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on July 19, 1988, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor (#101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Ann Garrison, at 1:30 p.m. Tape 324 - Side 1 ROLL CALL Ernie Ross Present Bud Halldorson Present Louis Rademacher Present Jerry Burnett Present Paulette Weaver Present LeAnn Reid Present Ivan Gosnell Absent - telephoned Lynn Brown Present Ann Garrison Absent - telephoned LeAnn Reid was present, but asked to be excused after it was ascertained a quorum was present. Also present: Brian Bingle, Current Planner, Jan Rundus, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary. A quorum was present. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 5, 1988, was approved as distributed. CASE: Galeton Sanitation District APPLICANT: Galeton Civic Association REQUEST: Review a Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-201 et seq., C.R.S. , for a proposed Sanitation District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI of Section 31, and the SW} of Section 32, T7N, and part of the NE} of Section 6 and the NW} of Section 5, T6N, all in R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado APPEARANCE: Elmo Peterson, P.E. , Urban Engineering, Ltd. , represented the applicant. The Town of Galeton has formed a civic association because of the current sewer setup in the town. There is an old, inadequate, private sewer system, cesspools, septic tanks, and an outhouse. The leach fields are not working properly where they are installed and raw sewage is being dumped into Willow Creek. There are approximately fifty potential consumers at this time. The sanitation district would be designed for one hundred taps. The Weld County Health Department has issued a moratorium that no new septic permits will be issued until the town's septic problems are resolved. He also discussed alternative methods for financing this project. 880925 Q d `Y'T9 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting July 19, 1988 Page 2 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked the applicant's representative if they had reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff? They have, and have no objections to the recommendation. The Chairman asked that the recommendation be filed with the summary as a permanent record of the proceedings. MOTION: Paulette Weaver moved the request of the Galeton Civic Association for review of a service plan for the Galeton Sanitation District be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bud Halldorson. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bud Halldorson - yes; Ernie Ross - yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; Louis Rademacher - yes; Paulette Weaver - yes; Lynn Brown - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-841 APPLICANT: Suckla Farm REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Recreational Facility (Hot Air Balloon Launch) in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} SW} Of Section 10, TIN, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 2.5 miles east of Dacono; east of Weld County Road 19 APPEARANCE: Thomas E. Hellerich, Dinner, Hellerich, and Lazar, Attorneys at Law, represented the applicant. This is an 8.5 acre site. Twenty-five to thirty ballonist would use this site. Traffic would be increased by one to two vehicles during the week and ten to twelve vehicles during the week-end. The necessary forms have been submitted to the FAA, but no response has been received yet. This is a launching site only for members of this club. 830925 GALETON CIVIC ASSOCIATION 24857 First Street Galeton, Colorado 80622 Telephone: 303/454-2078 President: Secretary: William V. Warren 'Sharon K. Ryan board Hillof Directors: 24805 • 2nd Street Glen Galeton,Pleasant Hill Avenue Galeton, Colorado 80622 Hari Hill Colorado 80622 303/454-2921 or 352.8677 763/a4-2u6 Marion on Richter treasurer: rdnard C. Ryan Vice-President[ hazel Her: Snaren K. Ryan a" 4857 First Street Kayne R. Griffin 24857 First Street 24lcton, Colorado 63L22 301eton, Colorado 80622 307/454-2078 �1111am W. Warren 303/454-2078 May 23 , 1988 Board of Weld County Commissioners Weld County Colorado RE: Proposed Galeton Sanitation District Dear Commissioners: Please find enclosed the proposed Service Plan prepared by Elmo Peterson of Urban Engineering, Ltd. , pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes , Title 32 , Part 2 . The Galeton Civic Association, a Colorado non-profit corporation formed for the purpose of seeking means to upgrade the sewer system in the area referred to as Galeton , Colorado , requested this Plan be prepared. With the aid of agents of the Weld County Housing Authority and the Farmer 's Home Administration, it now looks like it will be possible to get funding for the project. In order to go forward with funding, I hereby enclose the proposed Service Plan and ask that the Commissioners begin the process of reviewing and approving the Plan, with the goal in mind of forming the Galeton Sanitation District. Sincerely, GALETON CIVIC ASSOCIATION Cc � '' vt't By: William W. Warren, President WWW/skr Enclosures: Service Plan Check Copies to: All Members of the Board of Directors of the Galeton Civic Association 880925 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Paulette Weaver that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE: Galeton Sanitation District APPLICANT: Galeton Civic Association REQUEST: Review a Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-201 et seq. , C.R.S. , for a proposed Sanitation District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI of Section 31, and the SW} of Section 32, T7N, and part of the NE} of Section 6 and the NW} of Section 5, T6N, all in R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Refer to Page 11-5, Exhibit 11-1 of Service Plan Application Based upon the review criteria set forth in Section 4. 32-1-203 (1) , C.R.S. , the Weld County Planning Commission recommends approval the Galeton Sanitation District. 1. There is an existing and projected need for an organized sanitation district in the proposed area. 2. The existing service in the area is inadequate for present and projected needs. 3. The proposed district is capable of providing adequate and economic service to the area within its proposed boundaries. 4. The area to be included in the proposed District has and will have the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtednesses on a reasonable basis. 5. Adequate service is not or will not be available to the service area through the county, other existing municipal or quase-municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable time on a comparable basis. 6. The proposal is in compliance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 7. The proposal will comply with the 208 Area-Wide Wastewater Management Plan. 8. The creation of the proposed District will be in the best interests of the area to be served. Motion seconded by Bud Halldorson 880925 Galeton Sanitation District July 17, 1988 Page 2 VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Bud Halldorson Ernie Ross Jerry Burnett Louis Rademacher Paulette Weaver Lynn Brown The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on July 19, 1988, and recorded in Book No. XI of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 20th day of July, 1988. Bobbie Good Secretary 880925 Date: July 19, 1988 CASE: Galeton Sanitation District APPLICANT: Galeton Civic Association REQUEST: Review a Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-201 et seq. , C.R.S. , for a proposed Sanitation District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI of Section 31, and the SWI of Section 32, T7N, and part of the NE} of Section 6 and the NW} of Section 5, T6N, all in R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Refer to Page 11-5, Exhibit 11-1 of Service Plan Application Based upon the review criteria set forth in Section 4. 32-1-203 (1) , C.R.S. , the Department of Planning Services recommends approval the Galeton Sanitation District. 1. There is an existing and projected need for an organized sanitation district in the proposed area. 2. The existing service in the area is inadequate for present and projected needs. 3. The proposed district is capable of providing adequate and economic service to the area within its proposed boundaries. 4. The area to be included in the proposed District has and will have the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtednesses on a reasonable basis. 5. Adequate service is not or will not be available to the service area through the county, other existing municipal or quase—municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable time on a comparable basis. 6. The proposal is in compliance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 7. The proposal will comply with the 208 Area—Wide Wastewater Management Plan. 8. The creation of the proposed District will be in the best interests of the area to be served. 880925 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Dater July 12, 1988 NAME: Galeton Sanitation District, c/o Galeton Civic Association ADDRESS: 24857 First Street Galeton, Colorado 80622 REQUEST: To review a Service Plan pursuant to Section 32-1-201, et seq. , C.R.S, for a proposed Sanitation District. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE of Section 31 and the SWI of Section 32, T7N, and part of the NE} of Section 6 and the NW} of Section 5, in T6N, all in R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Refer to page II-5, Exhibit II-1 of the Service Plan application POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 32-1-203 (2) , C.R.S. as amended. The purpose of the Sanitation District is to provided wastewater disposal to Galeton and to the surrounding areas. Referral agencies contacted have no objections to the service plan as submitted. • 880925 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO GALETON, COLORADO SERVICE PLAN FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT GENERAL The form and content of a service plan is prescribed by CRS, Section 32-1-202. Several items requested by the statutes were considered but not completely covered by discussion material in the Service Plan. The following discussions are pertinent to the Plan. Questions about these items were raised by the Weld County Attorney's office, see attached Addendum 1 Exhibit A. TAX REVENUES The Galeton Water and Sanitation District, when formed, will have the power to levy an ad valorum tax on property within the District. The tax monies collected could be used to pay off any debts that the District incurs for construction. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others require that operation and maintenance expenses be supported by user fees. The assessed value of the property within the proposed district is about $275,000. Two parcels, one in Section 31-7-64 and one in Section 32-7-64 will need to be split off from the large farms of which they are a part so that only the houses and outbuildings are assessed. Without these two par- cels, the assessed value is $256,480. If the Board of Directors of the proposed district decides to assess a ten mill levy on the property in the District, the amount raised would be $2,750. This income could be applied to the annual loan repayment of $10,140.92 (See sheet VIII-2) and would reduce the monthly charge for customers from $23.13• per month to $17.40 per month. Only 20 percent of the assessed value of the proposed District is commercial and industrial property. The taxes on this non-residential property amount to $550.00 per year and could reduce resi- dential sewerage costs by $13.75 per year per household ($1.14 per month) . The reduction in cost for each residence would be less than one dollar per month when 50 customers are receiving sewer service. The net result of assessing a property tax levy on the lands and improve- ments within the District would be to shift a small part of the monthly cost of service from User Fees to Property Tax. Some users annual cost would be increased, and some users annual cost would decrease. The churches, fire district, Lions Club and other exempt organizations would see a decrease in the annual cost of sewer service. The method of collecting funds from Galeton residents and property owners will be decided by the Board of Directors after they are elected. Their decision will affect the amount charged to each separate individual, but it will not change the average cost of sewer service per customer. The Ser- vice Plan addresses only the cost of service and not the apportionment of this cost to user fees or taxes. -1- 880925 ALTERNATE SEWER SERVICE Galeton is relatively remote from any other community or subdivision. As shown on Exhibit II-4, the Town of Eaton is 7 miles west of Galeton. The Town of Gill is also 7 miles away. Both Lucerne and Barnesville are 9 miles from Galeton. It is not economically feasible to transport sewage wastes to any of these communities. There are no sewage treatment facilities less than 7 miles from Galeton. There is also no subdivision or group of homes within a 7 mile radius. For this reason, the Service Plan does not address the pos- sibility of cooperating with any other entity. OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS As mentioned in the Service Plan, Galeton residents can and do receive domestic water from North Weld County Water District, P.O. Box 56, Lucerne, CO 80645. The Water District includes Galeton and assesses a 5 mill tax on property within the proposed Galeton Water and Sanitation District. Other Districts that levy a tax on residents of Galeton are: 1. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District 1250 N. Wilson Avenue Loveland, Colorado 80537 2. West Greeley Soil Conservation District 4302 W 9th Street Road Greeley, Colorado 80634 3. Galeton Fire Protection District Galeton, Colorado 80622 4. Weld County Library District 2227 23rd Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 5. Aims Community College 5401 W 20th Street Greeley, Colorado 80634 6. School District RE-2, Eaton 36 Cottonwood Eaton, Colorado 80615 These Districts may have concerns about the formation of another taxing dis— trict because it may affect their taxing ability. They are to be notified about the hearings for the formation of the Galeton Water and Sanitation Dis— trict. AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN The Larimer-Weld Regional Council of Governments updated the Areawide Water Quality Management Plan in 1985. Since that time the LWRCOG has been dis- solved and the North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association has been created to promote regional water quality planning and coordination in Lari- mer and Weld Counties. The Association has adopted the planning principles set forth in the 1985 update by LWRCOG. -2- 880925 On page III-12 of this Plan is a list of Recommended Management Agencies and page III-13 is a list of Recommended Operations Agencies. Galeton is not men- tioned on either of these lists nor is the area specifically mentioned or con- sidered in any of the information and recommendations of the Plan. However, on page III-5, the water quality management problems pertinent to areas such as Galeton are enumerated as follows: 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 Water Quality Management Problems Some problems which adversely affect water quality can be attributed to activities which are controllable through institutional solutions. If such problems occur, the responsible wastewater management agency in the area can be effective in seeing that the proper actions are taken to reduce the pollution source to an acceptable level , that being where no violations of water quality standards occur or no significant degradation in existing ambient quality or beneficial uses results. Activities which can lead to water degradation and which can be amenable to institutional control may involve point or non-point sources of pollutants. Such activities include: * The use of individual septic tank/leaching systems for disposal of household sewage. These systems are used primarily in rural areas with no central sewage collection facilities. Problems can result from improper design and/or construction, poor soil conditions, or a high ground water table. * The proliferation of small package-type sewage treatment plants in an area. These small plants may present significant operational and • maintenance problems with which the owner usually does not have the resources to cope. * Ownership of sewage treatment plants by home-owners' associations. Financial obligations to provide for proper 0 & M and replacement of facilities are difficult to insure, and the responsibility for the discharge is difficult to assign. * The disposal of solid and liquid wastes to land in areas where acceptable conditions may not be present. This problem may involve solid waste refuse landfill sites, septage pumping disposal ponds, brine waste disposal sites, or sludge and septage land disposal locations. * Urban stormwater runoff from more densely developed areas. Stormwater discharged from city streets, paved areas, industrial sites, and other III-5 -3- 880925 locations can have a significant impact if efforts are not made to limit pollutants which can be transported by the runoff. * Erosion and sedimentation from areas where the natural soil and vegetative cover conditions have been disturbed. A significant impact may be caused from sediment discharges resulting from construction, logging, agriculture, road building, and other activities. 0 0 0 0 0 Also on page III-7, the Plan suggests that the solution to these problems for the Galeton area will require a management agency and an operating agency. 0 0 0 0 0 As was indicated above, a management agency should have land use authority to be effective in solving water quality problems associated with development. The concerns for water quality related to septic tank use, proliferation of small treatment plants, urban runoff, erosion and sedimentation, and other activities can be approached through various forms of land use controls. The objective of the regional planning effort and cooperation among adjacent or overlapping entities is to prevent environmental degradation through the development of agreements between the appropriate agencies that will deal with the causes of the problems. An operating agency must be able to design, construct, operate, and maintain waste treatment works and to finance these operations through . the raising of sufficient revenues. A management agency must have the authority to carry out appropriate portions of the areawide plan in addition to those required capabilities of an operating agency. The regional planning agency has to be a single representative entity, including elected officials from local governments, which is capable of developing an effective areawide waste treatment management plan and implementation procedures. All should have the capacity to enter into agreements with each other to provide the best cooperative approach to water quality management. 0 0 0 0 0 The community of Galeton has most of the above "problems" and the Weld County Board of Commissioners will serve as the management agency. The creation of the Galeton Water and Sanitation District will provide an oper— ating agency, the missing link for curing some of the problems. This Service Plan does comply wiht the AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN in that it recommends creating an agency that can effectively deal with the local problems. At present there is no such agency. Discussions between Elmo Peterson of Urban Engineering and Dave Du Bois of NFRWQPA have been held several times during the formation of the Service Plan. These discussions have led to the submittal of the attached Addendum No. 1 , Exhibit B to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. The Prehearing -4- 880925 Statement may result in the addition of Galeton to the EPA Priority List for funding purposes. A State hearing on the funding list will be held in August and another one will be held early next year. Galeton is currently No. 7 on the Colorado Revolving Fund Priority List and may be placed high on the list for EPA grants of up to 55% of the treatment system costs. This NFRWQPA statement lists the Galeton project and is an additional in— dication that the Service Plan complies with the AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN. ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCES The Service Plan deals heavily with funding the project with a Farmers Home Administration loan and grant. As indicated above, other sources of funds may be available. A grant from EPA could amount to 55% of eligible facili- ties, primarily the treatment system. This could be about $50,000 includ- ing construction, design, and associated costs. The District would still need to finance $230,000 by other loans, grants, and fees if the costs remain the same. However, past experience indicates that the requirements imposed by EPA for labor rates, equal opportunity reporting, and other associated regulations and reports will discourage several local contractors from bid- ding on the construction of the proposed sewer lines and treatment plant. It has been determined that the EPA regulations will increase costs by 10% to 20%, in this case $20,000 to $40,000. The increased cost will effectively negate the advantages of receiving a $50,000 grant. Another State program for funding the system may be the Colorado Revolving Loan Fund. Although both the Federal and State governments have created the fund, no money has as yet been allocated. Attached is a copy of an article from the July, 1988 Civil Engineering magazine that explains the dilema. Even if bonds can be sold to create a revolving fund, the interest rate may be too high to be affordable unless that State subsidizes the int— erest. This subsidy would come out of State taxes, some of which are col- lected from residents of Galeton, so this is a "Catch 22" situation. This same situation of higher construction bids occurs when grant funds are obtained from Community Development Block Grants. As stated above, primary emphasis has been given to obtaining loan and grant funds from Farmers Home Administration. If these efforts fail because of lack of funds or low priorities, other means of funding will be investigated. Of first order, however, is the creation of the District so that official re- quests and decisions can be made by a legally constituted Board of Directors. -5- 880925 rr1fORAn®u hiDe To Planning Department Date June 21 . 1988 COLORADO From Lee D. Morrison . Assistant County Attorney •• SubJeer Comments on Galeton Civil Association Special District Service Plan These comments should be considered in the nature of a review of the form of the plan and not comments regarding the merits of the plan. The form of the plan is basically determined by C.R.S . , Section 32-1-202 , with additional information required by Sections 203 and 204 . In particular , C . R. S . , Section 32-1-202 (2) , lists those items which must be in the service plan and a copy of that portion of the statute is attached. (2) (3) require specific information regarding tax revenue . It appears , although I did not see that it was explicitly stated, that there is no plan to derive income from taxation in this ' district but rather to use only grants , loans , and service charges. There probably should be some discussion one way or the other regarding the use of taxes to raise revenues . There needs to be discussion of the availability, or lack thereof, of other community wastewater treatment systems . While Section 3 describes an existing system, I have not been able to locate information on the possibility of service from other special • districts or municipalities. Further , there needs to be a list provided of any existing municipality or special district, with address , which has levied an ad valorem tax within the previous tax year and which has boundaries within a radius of three miles of the proposed special district boundary or a statement that no such entities exist . The addresses are to be provided for the purpose of notice prior to the service plan hearings. It should also be noted that the Petitioners should have already compiled a list of property owners within the proposed district so that not more than thirty days nor less than twenty days prior to the Board of County Commissioners hearing, the Petitioners are able to send post card notification to the property owners . The application also seems somewhat lacking in relation to a discussion of how this proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and how it is consistent with the 208 Water Quality Management Plan for the Larimer-Weld area. It is possible for additional information to be submitted prior to the Planning Commission meeting which could act as a supplement to the service plan and could be included in the decision by the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners . It should be noted, if other referral entities needed that information, that ADDENDUM #1, EXHIBIT A 880925 Planning Department t Page 2 June 21 , 1988 it would probably be best to have the supplement submitted prior to scheduling so that further referrals could be made in advance of the hearings . ;e D. rrison As istant County ttorney LDM: ss ,„„7 JUN 2 2 1988 ci Weld Ca. Planning Cammissiou ADDENDUM #1, EXHIBIT A 880925 BEFORE THE COLORADO WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION PREHEARING STATEMENT FOR RULEMAKING HEARING CONCERNING: ( 1 ) ADOPTION OF A PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION GRANT PROJECT PRIORITY LIST FOR FEDERAL FUNDS ( FY-89 ) , 5 . 13.0 ; AND ( 2 ) APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED REVOLVING FUND INTENDED USE PLAN FOR FY-89 , 5 . 15 . 0, INCLUDING (A) ADOPTION OF THE REVOLVING FUND PRIORITY LIST FOR FY-89 , AND (B) ADOPTION OF FY-89 ADDITIONS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE REVOLVING FUND ELIGIBILITY LIST . NORTH FRONT RANGE WATER QUALITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION TESTIMONY The North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association (NFRWOPA) hereby submits the following comments as a prehearing statement for the noticed rulemaking hearing scheduled for August 2 , 1988 at 1 :00 p.m. : 1 . The NFRWOPA is very concerned that small communities throughout Colorado which have significant needs related to wastewater treatment and water quality protection cannot afford on their own to provide the facilities necessary to meet those treatment needs. They are, in many cases, in severe financial hardship situations and must receive some state and federal aid if they are to be able to comply with the pertinent regulations. • 2 . The establishment of priorities for grants and loans should give strong consideration to these small communities and their financial needs. Having a large population should not be considered a factor in assigning priority points. 3. Many small communities will not have the financial capability to repay a loan for an entire project, even considering the low interest rate. Some provision should be made to allocate as many grant funds as possible to assist these financially strapped and low income areas . EXHIBITS Examples of the financial needs and projected effects on rate-payers for two projects in Region 2 are included in Exhibit 1 to this prehearing statement. WITNESSES The NFRWOPA will potentially call as witnesses David DuBois and one representative of a small community . These witnesses would summarize the testimony on needs of small communities. ADDENDUM #1, EXHIBIT B 880925 EXHIBIT 1 Examples of Financial Need for Small Communities An analysis was done on two proiects which are needed by small commun- ities in Region 2 to determine the per monthly cost per household for the required sewerage service . The two proiects are those proposed for the community of Galeton in Weld County and the Mountain Range Shadows subdivision in Larimer County . The Galeton project would provide sewers and wastewater treatment for 40 existing houses initially at an estimated cost of about $270 , 000 . Capacity could be provided for about 30 additional lots which may be built upon in the future. The Mt. Range Shadows project would provide sewer rehabilitation and connection to the South Fort Collins Sanitation District, abandoning an existing unacceptable treatment plant. There are 299 lots and 254 houses in the subdivision. The cost is estimated at $2 , 244, 000 with a $281 ,000 energy impact grant approved , leaving a balance of $1 , 963 ,000 . Four scenarios for financing these projects were examined . The numbers used for percent interest charged for loans ( 3% and 7%) were picked to show an approximate range of costs . Other interest rates could be substituted and the results adjusted accordingly. The four financing scenarios are: 1 . Financing the entire project with borrowed funds such as bonds at a market rate of interest ( 7% used) . 2 . Obtaining a loan from the Revolving Fund for the eligible portions of the projects at a low interest rate (3% used) and financing the non-eligible remainder at 7%. * 3. Obtaining a 55% grant for the eligible costs and financing the remainder at 7%. 4. Obtaining a 55% grant for eligible costs , a 3% loan for the remaining 45% of eligible costs, and borrowing the non-eligible portion at 7%. *Non-eligible costs included tap fees and plant investment fees. Projected Monthly Household Charges** Scenario Mt. Range Shadows Galeton 1 . No assistance. $65 $55 2 . 3% loan for eligible costs. 54 42 3. 55% grant & 7% loan. 42 29 4. 55% grant & 3% loan w/non- 37 23 eligible costs ! 7%. **Includes O & M monthly charges of $12 .00 for Mt. Range Shadows and $2 .00 for Galeton. ADDENDUM #1, EXHIBIT B 880925 w WASHINGTOr� non-point source pollution control cash payments be made and that clean CLEANWATER grants and the clean lakes program. water goals be met more quickly by al- At press time, the Senate had not lowing states to earn interest on the CLOUDSyet acted, but several Senators, includ- cash and use it as collateral to sell ing Environmental Protection Sub- bonds. The previously mentioned ex- Despite the overwhelming enactment committee Chairman, George Mitchell ception for certain states should ame- last year of Public Law 100-4, the na- (D-ME), characterized the administra- liorate part of this problem. States can tion's clean water program remains don's proposed cuts in the grants pro- use the money in their SRFs for: mired in budgetary politics. The law gram as "reneging on a commitment." • Loans. Municipalities can borrow authorizes $18 billion over nine years, money at or below market interest rates for fiscal years 1986-94, to fund the SRFs construction of local sewage treatment with a 20-year repayment deadline. Earlier this year, the EPA released fi- • Loan Guarantees. SRFs guarantee systems, while gradually phasing out subsidy Of total, nal guidelines to assist states in estab- that a loan will be repaid, pledging the the billion b is to program.used the the states lishing SRFs, the first step in transfer- resources of the fund. Reduction of risk $9.6 as grants to local communities, and ring financial responsibility for sewage lowers the interest charge and overall $8.4 billion is to placed in state plant construction from the federal cost of the bond to the community. n to bes (Ws) in tated re-a government to the state and local level. • Bond Insurance. Insures bondhold- volvinglo inteloat a ( s) adis The final guidance document, which ers of repayment, reducing the interest States must loans toa communities.to outlines how states are to set up revolv- charge and overall cost of the bond to qualify for federal provide money. Loan matchr to ing loan funds for construction project the community. menu communities could L then financing, was criticized by state and • Refinancing Existing Obligations. used fromt make new loans, thus pro- municipal officials who contend that Allows replacement of existing munici- be viding a self-sustaining source of EPA is making the transition more dif- pal bonds at reduced interest costs if money for states to finance local con- ficult and more expensive by not giv- the debt was incurred before March 7, ion after the flow of federal ing states direct cash payment to set up 1985. Refinanced projects must comply structmoney stops. the loan funds. with requirements of the Water Qual- The bud- State and local officials, who were ity Act. request administration's of only $1.5 fiscal 1989n for the hoping that the federal seed money for • Local Debt Insurance. May guaran- get the loans would come in a series of tee local debt obligations where such construction grants program received a response on Capitol Hill. Mem- quarterly cash payments, will instead action would improve credit market ac- chillyhill of Congress, . a receive Letters of Credit (LOC) whereby cess or reduce interest rates. election year, like particularly al an dee- cash becomes available only as project Beginning in fiscal 1989, states that Ilecs home to the district,tobring federal also l.. expenses are actually incurred, Under have been certified by the EPA to estab- pearing to be for environment. the plan, states will receive LOCs over a lish SRFs, may use grants as seed money budgetary for the 12 to 36 month period. States can then for them. Texas, Georgia and Tennes- However,limit dgyconcerns n will for draw cash from the LOCs to pay for up- see were the first states to receive the likely limit on congressional g s support forn- grading or building sewage treatment necessary EPA certification. ccons of the authorized t levelbillion,of$2 i4 plants. But, states may not draw on The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stead federal funds "solely for the purpose of recently announced that state and lo- the congressional budget earning interest." With the LOC, fed- cal bonds sold to finance sewage treat- In the Environmental onmensio process,oce- eral officials hope to save $2.3 billion ment plants through SRFs will be ex- the (EPA) nmental Protection n grants program over the life of the program. Note that empt from federal taxes. Last year, c part A) huge $60 billion a HUD-amIn- states with "particularly aggressive le- when EPA announced that SRFs would isof the ensile appropriation veraging proposals" may receive a be capitalized with a federal LOC, nu- dependent g bill. "more accelerated cash draw" under merous officials expressed concerns re- This bill also appropriates money for the payment plan. Eligibility will be garding the tax exempt status of bonds the U.S. space program, veterans' af- determined on a case-by-case basis. The issued with LOCs. The IRS ruling is seen fairs, the National Science Founda- guidance adds that "a state seeking an as easing the transition from a feder- tion, (NSF) and housing programs. The exception must first demonstrate to EPA ally funded EPA sewage construction administration requested a 30% in- that there are projects ready to proceed program to one funded primarily by crease for NASA and a 20% hike for in the immediate future with sufficient SRFs. NSF, which wouldn't leave appropria- costs to justify the proposed leveraging Copies of the Initial Guidance — State tions subcommittees much room to and that the absence of cash on an ac- Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund add funds for other programs. The celerated basis will substantially delay are available from Richard Kuhlman, House Appropriations Committee these projects." U.S. EPA, Office of Municipal Control, compromised and allocated $2 billion State and local officials fear that the Planning and Analysis Division (WH- to construction grants, while curtailing LOCs will ultimately result in reduced 546), 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, increases for NASA and NSF. The dollars and delayed construction. These D.C. 20460, (202) 382.7256.—Casey House panel concurred with the ad- officials argue that Congress intended Dinges, legislative affairs manager, ASCE, ministration's proposal to zero-fund Washington, D.C. 106 CIVIL ENGINEERING JULY 1988 ADDENDUM #1 , EXHIBIT C 880925 .ya4,“ L :. 6 e nJrxy a w i6c'73:..41'u;x t�@$ bfrc i r'" fr. n :T w7e `},�'vw r _ rcf' * ra _y .q',ir4„.1,,i 5,v I } 1 µ 2fyw> .r1}r '�_�q rA 4'44 5 44 14,21e,N.P:f hc.4“r; y., >t4 Prot t. 1-0ir^ nt, ,' i Z6,74:',11-•r'F.r'4- r ,, 8x ,� ir, 9 're'-'Fib f 4it 7.14 r.$Y>' ti., '1�x1'7Y':' v r ''''&77t:i:y I rr •y: r "b5 3 1 J atl »>. r m i 3°'h *i '' r r,J fl% .r. rtit x ' f N �t ;rip:xi, z- a I } r , 4� r •..'F, t ,`.1 7th,rS r r t J r141 t h y ,�`. � ,�{ ` i '�'.ij .e. qqp, Tc 7. ",;- t :Y:.,14''?a . ,x lz h3 �•, 1 (may 'F �r' i�q ".F 'x „+ $ (' `" a rj ..e-44�' } ( t '3 F ..1^` 'dTK''!y, �'4rf• r r' r." ;'y.if�' �YPN T. •. P+y �i4'�'14' .r. 14.4,::-1 '`e r> i ct,,:N 3 .d 'N X A: 4T1341P 1987 PARCEL LIST image 13 ! I DATE: 12/30/87 I GALETOIu , COLORADO 11 owi ER5NIP LIST I I 5ARFOOT ALFRED & EVA PIN: 0990286 PARC 33X 347 *PARCEL: 071131000009 GALETON. . __.._._ CO.._ 80622 _. -._ - - . _. . _.-. ___.. ACREAGE: 10154 PT E2SE4 31 7 64 BEG 760.5 ' W & 30' N OF SE TAX AREA: 0220 COR 5E4 N140 ' W1259 51409 E1259 TO BEG EXC UP RR MILL LEVY: 73 . 1990 CO RES __-_. SEBALD RAYMOND W E MARIE PIN: 0990386 PARC BOX 346 --_ _- ___ _.__._*PARCEL:_-_..07.11.31000010_ GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 10161 PT E25E4 31 7 64 BEG 685.5' W & 30' N OF SE TAX AREA: 0220 CUR_SEC_.31_ N140"._ W75!.51409_.E75• . TO BEG ( TR 22 G. _. . MILL. LEVY:_ 73..1990... I 22A) EXC UPRR CO RES %24801 WCR 74% 24801 WCR 74 TRIANGLE CROSS RANCH INC PIN.. 0990486 PARC *PARCEL: 071131000011 '3 BOX 727 GALETON_- __. CO 80622 _ _ .. .ACREAGE:I . . 10160 THAT PT E25E4 31 764 BEG 4649W OF INTERSEC TAX AREA: 0220 OF S LN SE4 & UPRR R/W N1409 1450' 51409 E509 TO MILL LEVY: 73. 1990 BEG EXC_ UPRR . CO..RES-. (TR 211 - - _-- - - I ?FENNING ROBERT D & ESTHER M PIN: 0990586 PARC 3 BOX 724 *PARCEL: 071131000012 ' ;:LETON CO B0622 ACREAGE: 101523 PT SE4 31. 7 64 BEG AT A PT 33794 OF BDRY TAX AREA: 0220 LN UPRR R/W & 30' N OF S LN SEC 31 N140 ' W126. 5 ' MILL LEVY: 73 . 1990 51409 E126. 5' TO BEG ( . 70A MIL ) %24823 'WCR 74% 24321 WCR 74 880925 _ _ _ Y' . -i'_ I -..l w A w•. i a T J ' 1 .. • .t t 7. CR G \LLT :7 43r; DILLARD HERSCHEL W PIN: J99J7 O BOX 333 *PARCLL : 0711 ) GALETON CO 80622 AC It 01 : --- - - 10158 PT-.E25E4-- 31 7 64 BEG AT PT 212' w OF THE TAX AREA: 0207 INTERSEC OF W LN UPRR R/W E S LN SEC 31 N170' w25' MILL LEVY: 72 . 7 5170' E25 ' TO BEG ( TR 23) EXC UPRR CO RES C HILL GLEN L C HAZEL PIN: 09908 RT 1 BOX 146-A *PARCEL: 07113 EATON - CO 80615 _ -. _- __. ACREAGE: 10157 PT E2SE4 31 7 64 BEG 25' W OF UPRR R/W TAX AREA: 0207 N140' Wt85, 51408 E185' TO BEG EXC UPRR RES MILL LEVY: 72 . 7' FINCH AMOS PIN: 09909': BOX 332 .-._ .. .. --._-. *PARCEL:___ 0711.3 EATON CO 80615 ACREAGE: 10153 PT E25E4 31 7 64 BEG AT PT ON W BORY LN UP TAX AREA: 0220 _R/W__30' N_OF_.S_ LN ..SEC..31 - N140*._W25.1__5140' . E25! TO .-_.___..___MILL.LEVY: _73. 1 BEG ( TR 131 EXC UPRR RES PF.ENNING_. ROBERT__.D_.E._.ESTHER ..M- -- ...___-. _.__._._._ . _PIN:._.__09910 P O BOX 724 *PARCEL: 07113 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 10152A -ALL ...THAT._PT...NE4SE4 __..31_.7..64 LYING _WLY_.75 *______- . ___.TAX...AREA: ._._0220._. FROM CEN LN OF UPRR CO TRACK CONSTRUCTED ACROSS MILL LEVY: 73. 1 NE4SE4 C NOW ABDN ( TR 27) UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORP PIN: 09911 P 0 BOX 2500 *PARCEL: 07113. BROOMFIELD _. CO 80020 _ __. _._-_-.. ._ ACREAGE: 10152A-1 MIN RES PT 5E4 31 7 64 94A TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 1 J. Browner ) zvereH E. Pe1g1 oo 2,, eeIsdale- Or, Denver , Ca 60222 Nrx Roj H d (rent 805 fti sf, P, o, Box 1334 Berthoud , CO 805/ 3 880925 yy,, �1, 7414 „y„ ♦'i.y,' ro �.d.Y.5t�vS-Y`cA FY.; �r7i6 '} rA""I,5tlw " T i ATI341P 1987 PARCEL LIST DATE: 12/30/87 1-5%4 l Cecil Rick c, le< . 32809 yield Co, 2d, 59 ,Eo lon CO 80615 PIN: 1180986 _. ROUSE GLEN 6 PEGGY WYKES I *PAR PN: /18098605 RT 1 25288 CO RD 74 ACREAGE: 14C EATON CO 80615 _.. _ - 9588 NW4 5 6 64 7A ZITA EXC BEG---1194E G - 9250- S TAX 022001990 OF NW COR SEC 5 S423.7 ' ALONG RR R/W E179.24 MILL AREA: N423. 7' W177.6' TO BEG EXC UPRR CO RES ALSO _. . EXC ABB RR R/W (4R 20 ) %25288WCR 74% 25288 WCR 74 - _ . ... PIN: 1181086_. KREUTZ RANDALLR & PAULA E *PARCEL: / 18108601 35990 WELD CO RD 51 ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 ._._. __..._ ._.. - - TAX AREA: 0220 _ _ - %319013%35990BLK3 ZITA WCR MILL LEVY: 73. 1990 51 % 35990 WCR 51 --- - _ - PIN: 1181186 YOUNG JOHN 6 BARBARA *pARCEL: 08010500' P 0 BOX 2186 --. - ------- - - ACREAGE: - - EATON -------.__... ___...CO 80615 TAX AREA: 0220 9718 L23-24 BLK3 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1990 PIN: 1181286 ROUSE GLEN C PEGGY WYKES *PARCEL: 08010500 RT 1 25288 -00 RD 74 ACREAGE: FT COLLINS CO 80615 TAX AREA: 0220 971716 LI TO 12 BLK3 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1990 RAMOS REFUGIO F„ - n�! PIN: 1181386 8g;f%• :25 *PARCEL: 08010505 IJ6 N9 AU ACREAGE: 7 D 31 L;1 t. y- Y 70L13 bL TAX AREA: 0220 _ earl& l $ /5-645 PIN: 11815E ... YOUNG JOHN E BARBARA #PARCEL: 08010' P 0 BOX 2186 _ - .. . __ ACREAGE: EATON CO 80615 TAX AREA: 0220 49765 L13-14-15 BLK4 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73.1`. 4, PIN: 118161 GALINDO RITA __. . . __ - - - *PARCEL: 08010' RT I BOX 47A ACREAGE: 4. EATON CO 60615 TAX AREA: 0220 9765-D L16-17-18 BLK4 ZITA _ - MILL LEVY: 73. 1' 4 -_-__...----- --PIN: ..-1 l817 B GALINO -RITA - #PARCEL: 08010' RT 1 BOX 47A ACREAGE: EATON CO 80615 - -_- -TAX -AREA: . - 0220 - - - _ ---9765-CL19=20-2T-BLK4- ZITA -"-'" MILL LEVY: 73.1 it - - - .__ .._- -----._------- PIN: 11818 4 HILL DALE GLEN E LORI M #PARCEL: 08018 33512 WELD CO RD 51 - - - --_-- ACREAGE: 1 CO -80615- ----- -_ -EATON TAX AREA: 0220 9765-A 122-23-24 BLK4 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1 It PIN: 11819 GALINDO STEVE E FAY H _-,__ #PARCEL:- 08010 % HILL DALE E-LORI ACREAGE: f. 33512 WCR 51 TAX AREA: 0220 EATON CO 80615 _ - -" . . .._.-9765-A -IMPS - ONLY MH -L22-23=24 "-BLK"�4 "-ZIT A MILL LEVY: 73. 1 4, *REDMAN 73 LAND HILL DALE GLEN G LORI M - --- PIN: 11820 4 WHITE EUGENE L C LOIS *PARCEL: 0801C P 0 BOX 344 -- - - --- ACREAGE: 9767 2 CO 8062 . - - - GAI TAX AREA: 0220 4 9767 113-14-15 BLK9 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1 4 PIN: 11821 ROUSE GLEN G PEGGY WYKES -- - _ - ___ #PARCEL: 0801 [ -- RT1 " 25288C0 --RD -74 "- ACREAGE ti EATON CO 80615 ^TAX AREA 22'0 9766 L10-11-12 BLK9 ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1 w 880925 a + Pale. 156q MARTINEZ LUPE R G MARIA PIN: 1184 ' P 0 BOX 756 *PARCEL: 0801_ GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 9729 IMPS ONLY MH L19 PT L20-24 BLK13 ZITA GALETON TAX AREA: 0220 *H IL LC REST-7l-NK768E ... .. MILL LEVY: 73. , LAND DILLARD HERSCHEL W • DILLARD HERSCHEL W -- PIN: ._ 1184. -- - _ BOX 333 - *PARCEL: 0801 ( GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: - -- 9727 L15 ' THRU 18 - BLK13 - 1ST ADD ZITA - -- - - _- TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 1 OCHOA JESSE JR PIN: 1184: M 2000 UB CONESTOGA *PARCEL: 0801c - _.AUSTIN TX 78744 —.._._. ACREAGE: . _.. 9727 IMPS ONLY MH L15 TO 18 8LK13 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 - *MELODY 70-126945617297 MILL LEVY: 73. 1 LAND DILLARD HERSCHEL W - DILLARD HERSHCEL W PIN: 11844 BOX 333 _ *PARCEL: 08010 - - - - GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 9728 L13-14 BLK13 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 1 "- BOWMAN STEVEN ---_. - ___ ...._ - ------ ------- ...._._ .. -_.. . _ PIN: 11845 _ P 0 BOX 753 *PARCEL: 08010 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 9728 -IMPS ONLY -MH 113-14-BLK 13 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 *MONTROSE 73-IMC6745 ( 344 ) MILL LEVY: 73. 1 LAND DILLARD HERSCHEL W ._ SALAZAR MANUEL M JR PIN: 11846 P 0 BOX 743 *PARCEL: 08010 GALETON CO _. . 80622 .. - ACREAGE: t 9724 L12 BLKl3 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 1 , 880925 ... , 3" 'a2" y •- _ss<.:..Ya..' ''SW`'''a'j.._....,.�.w. S� in 'ei7' -.. -?ei..-..� — -tt I )., 7 0�4.t:,r_L L1SI Ail , l ' DATE: 12/30/87 )57O pin: 1184786 GARZA MARCUS & CANDELARIA *PARCEL: 08010601 BOX 13 ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 _. . . . TAX AREA: 0220 9723 Ll0-/ 1 BLK13 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 1991 -- - - - - - - -- - PIN: 1184886 *PARCEL: 1184886 GARZA MARCOS C & CANDELARIA0801060( P 0 BOX 328 _ . .. - ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9722 LB-9 BLK13 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 199, PIN: 1184986 GARZA MARCOS C & CANDELARIA 5 - - kpARCEL: 0801060 -"- - P O BOX 328 --_- ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9721 W54.85' OF N71 L6 6 5181 L6 & ALL L7 BLK13 - MILL LEVY: 73. 199' 1ST ADD ZITA PIN: -- 1185086 " " -- GALETON FIRE -PROTECTION- DISTRICT- *PARCEL: 0801060 % HELMUT BRUNNER ACREAGE: P 0 BOX 100 TAX AREA: 0220 GILL. --- CO 80624 -.._._. 9726 PT BLK13 1ST ADD ZITA BEG AT NE COR 11 W85v MILL LEVY: 73. 199 5140' E85' N140 ' TO BEG - - - PIN: 1185186 GALETON FIRE PROTECTION DIST *PARCEL: 0801060 ACREAGE: GALETON .-- ---- -CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9719 W54.85' L1 TO 5 BLK13 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73 .199 PIN: 1185286 MARTINEZ LUPE R & MARIA M _ ._ _.. _ - - -- kpARCEL: 0801060 -. --" . _- BOX 756.-.._._.__ _ ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9730 E25' L20 THRU 24 BLK13 1ST ADD .ZITA _ MILL LEVY: 73. 199 PIN: 1185386 MARTINEZ ROSENDO & VASQUEZ- FRANK - _- - - *PARCEL: 0801060 RT I BOX 49A ACREAGE: EATON CO 80615 TAX AREA: 0220 9139 L12BLK18 15T ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 199 • .. _._. _ PIN: 1185486 IP RIOS SILVERIO & ROSA kpARCEL: 0101060 1205 5TH ST _.. __ -_-. - - - - ACREAGE: - _---- GREELEY CO 60631 TAX AREA: 0220 • 9731 L11 BLK18 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 19S 880925 3 - , 57 / PIN: 11 .3533o C-%Ll 'IDO C RITA - ACREAGE : 9737 PT 1 3CX 474 : 0301C:500 C: i '3l 3 7��;< .anc4 : 02. . EgTCN 73. 1 X99.: L10 DLK13 : S ; A03 ZITA M TLL LEVY: PIN: 1145686 *PARCEL: 0801060C RI IN OO RITA *PACARCEL : ET 1 BOX 47-A TAX EAGE: 0220 EATON CO 8 ADD 22 . 199( %756 L9 BLK18 1ST W ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: }35954 GRANDVIEW AV'c 35958 GRANDVIEW AV PIN: 1185786 *PARCEL: 0801060' GALETON COMMUNITY CHURCH _-._.. _ - ACREAGE: CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0730199 GALETON 73 - MIAX LEVY: 9735 L7-8 BLK18 1ST ADD ZITA ___ ... PIN: 1185886 1185086 E SHARON K *PARCEL' - - RYAN EDWARD L ACREAGE: GALETON 2ND CO 80622 __... _. ._. _.-- -- - - TAX AREA: 0220 734 TAX LEVY: 22. 19` 9238 Lb BLK18 1ST ADD ZITA %24805 2ND} - 24805 2ND - --- 11d598( PIN'R - - M R- *PARCEL: 118 98( RI SS I 128 MYRNA ACREAGE: T 1 BOX TAX AREA: 0220 EATON CO 80615 73 . 19 9733 L5 BLK18 1ST ADD ZITA TAX LEVY: PIN: 118608 ._*PARCEL: 080106 ar GALETON BAPTIST CHURCH - -- - AGE: TAX AREA: 0220 GALETON CO 80622 p[RE 73. 19 ` THRU 4 BLK18 1ST ADD ZITA MLAXAREA: 9732 L1 PIN: 11861E W 35912 RODRIGUEZ PE VIE G BALVINA - - *PARCEL: 08010E ACREAGE: ;� GALETON GRAND ULEWCAOVE"80622 - - - - TAX AREA:A 0220 TAX LEVY: 2201' 9357 LI1 G 12DU EWKAV 1ST ADD ZITA }35912 GRANDVIEW AV} 35912 GRANDVIEW A PIN: 00135 -4. *PARCEL: 00135 010 35912 RODRIGUEZ ROSE MARIE _ ACREAGE: L GRANDVIEW AVE TAX AREA: 0220 GALETON CO 80622 22. 1 MILL LEVY: ;4 9747 OMPS ONLY MH LL1 & 12 BLK 17 1ST ADD GALET *HOMETTE RIQUEZ9PEDRO 6 BALVINA LAND ROORIQUEZ 4. 880925 ,, 1987 PARCEL LIST ATI34iP i57z DATE : 12/30/87 PIN: 1186286 GRIFFIN WAYNE R & KAREN GENE *PAR PIN: 1156286 35890 GRANDVIEW AVEO ACREAGE: GALETON CO 40622 - - . . TAX AREA: 0220 9746 L9-10 BLK17 1ST ADD, ZITA MILL AREA: 220199 %35890 GRANDVIEW AV4 35890 GRANDVIEW AV _ - _. DEUEL PIN: 1186386 403G E MARILYN *PARCEL: 0801060 t 403 _- .- - - - - -- _.- ACREAGE: - -- FT MORGAN CO 80701 TAX AREA: 0220 u9744 L7-8 BLK17 l5! ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 199 PIN: 1186486 SHEETS HOMER W G KAREN E _ _ - - *pqR PIN: 10186486 -- - 24797 PLEASANT HILL *PARCEL: GALETON CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9743 L5-6 BLKI7 15T ADD ZITA IMPS ON L6 MILL LEVY: 22 . 194 %24797 PLEASANT HILL% 24797 PLEASANT HILL PIN: 118654E - -VOHS WILLIAM D & TERESA S *PARCEL: 080106E 35809 PLEASANT HILL AV ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 -- - -- TAX AREA: 0220 9742 L3-48LK17 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 195 ` _ _. . . _ .-. PIN: 1186681 GALETON WATER WORKS CO *PARCEL: 080106( ACREAGE GALETON CO 80622 _ -- _ TAX AREA:: 0220 9741 N459 OF W26I Lt BLK17 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: . 73. 19 PIN: 118678 DILLARD HERSCHEL W _- _ _. -_- _. #PARPEN: 080106' 24806 PLEASANT HILL AV ACARAE : GALETON CO 80622 TAX EAGE: 0220 9741-A LI-2 BLK17 1ST ADD ZITA. EXC N45' OF MAX LEVY: 22. 19 426 # LI BLK17 I PN: 118688 WARREN WILLIAM W & THERESIA R *PARCEL: 101 18686 2N ST & PLEASANT HILLS AV ACREAGE: GALETON CO 80622 TAX AREA: 0220 9763 L2J-24 & N15I L22 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA MILL LEVY: 73. 15 .. PN: 11869E c I WACKER KENNETH C & CONSTANCE K *PAR PN: O1869 I) 24 22ND AV CT ACREAG M LEY CO 8J631 TAX AREA: =. Z-' D 970? L21-22 EXC 4151 L22 BLK14 1ST .i7 L? �. iT1 MILL LEVY: 73 . 1 "-. 46338 °L EASANT SILL RD: 757 PLEASANT HILL RD u 880925 Li -- T 11.. PIN: 1187 P1 CyCARD AIM & mELVA PARCEL : 0807 2D11 E 18 CO 80631 ACREAGE: GRE976 _ _ . ......_ ... TAX AREA: 022C 0 L-20 DLK14 1ST ADD ZITA 976 PLEASANT HILL% MILL LEVY: 73 . §35824 LEASANT HILL ` 35824 PLE - _._ _... _.._. ___. P 6DEWEY BESSIE M . PIN: 1187 ALFRED *PARCEL: 0801 BOX 301 CO 80622 ACREAGE: GALETON 4 L16 BLK14 15T ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 9759 LI9 L N ' MILL LEVY: 73. `+. IPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY _ _ _... PIN: 1187 pRINC 711 HIGH ST IA 50309 *pARCEL: 0801 ACREAGE: G DES MOINES 18 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA EXC N41 L18 _ _ TAX AREA: 0220 g758 L17- ___ . -. .__._ _. _ MILL LEVY: 73. E W2, pp ALLEY -A DJ _.._--_.. .._....... - PIN: 1187 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE - COMPANY- --"" *PARCEL: 0801 441. 711 HIGH ST IA 50309 ACREAGE: DES MOINES 9756 L15-^ 16 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA £ W2t0F -ALLEYADJ TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 44. GALETON PIN: 1187 �w LIONS CLOD OF *PARCEL: 0801 CO 80622 ACREAGE: GALETON G 14 BLKl4 1ST ADD ZITA E W2 DF ALLEY TAX AREA: 0220 8755 LI3 MILL LEVY: 73. ADJ _ PIN: 1187 Gr N _. *PARCEL: 0801 NIX MARY CO 80622 ACREAGE: 'w GALETON 0 L10 ALL 11-12 OLKI4 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 9754 SIS _ ._ .__._._...._. . _ MILL LEVY: 73. PIN: 1187 NIX NOMA *PARCEL: 0801 ( %.c- CO 80622 ACREAGE: GALETON N1OI L10 BLX14 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 9753 L8-9 G MILL LEVY: 73. ' PIN: 1187 SHULER BETTE J *PARCEL: 1187- RI 1 BOX 13 CO 80615 ACREAGE: EATON IMPS ONLY MH L8-9 N1D� L10 BLK 14 1 ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 'I.... 9753 65-215577 MILL LEVY: 73 . ; *NEW MOON NORMA _ __. LAND NIX 830925 ATI341P 987 PARCEL LIST DATE: 12/30/87 page 152`f DEWEY ALFRED P 6 BESSIE M PIN: 1187686 BOX 301 *PARCEL: 0801060( • GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE : 9751-A L7 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 1991 YOUNG JOHN D & BARBARA J PIN: 1187986 P 0 BOX 2186 *PARCEL: 0801060 EATON CO 80615 ACREAGE: 9751 L6 BLK14 15T ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 199( YOUNG JOHN D 6 BARBARA J PIN: 1188086 P 0 80X 2186 *PARCEL: 0801060 EATON CO 80615 ACREAGE: 9750 L4-5 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 199: SALAZAR MANUEL GARZA 6 MARIE M -- - - -- - - PIN: 1188186 • BOX 757 *PARCEL: 0801060 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 9749 L1-2-3 BLK14 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 ei MILL LEVY: 73. 199 •. CORNISH 4-H CLUB PIN: 1188286 *PARCEL: 0801060 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: • 9771-A L13 THRU 24 BLKt5 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 199 • MORADO RAMON 6 MARIA PIN: 1188386 - --- - - *PARCEL: 0801060 GALETON CO 80622 3 Sf ACREAGE: 9771 L5 THRU 12 BLKIS 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 199 • MORADO RAMON 6 MARIA PIN: 1188486 *PARCEL: 0801060 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE: 9770 LI THRU 4 BLKl5 1ST ADD ZITA TAX AREA: 0220 MILL LEVY: 73. 199 * SCHOOL DIST #103 PIN: 118858E *PARCEL: 0801061 GALETON CO 80622 ACREAGE : 8 • L7 THRU 12 BLK16 1ST /103 ZETA TAX AREA: 3220 .; I_L LEJY : 73 . 19'- 80925 GALETON. COLORADO SERVICE PLAN WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT PREPARED FOR GALETON CIVIC ASSOCIATION 24857 FIRST STREET GALETON, COLORADO 80622 PRESIDENT: WILLIAM W. WARREN SECRETARY: SHARON K. RYAN By: URBAN ENGINEERING, LTD. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1863 2nd Avenue P.O. Box 5146 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Project Number 1701 880925 GALETON, COLORADO SERVICE PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS SECTION SUBJECT PAGE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS I-1 II GENERAL INFORMATION A. Purpose of Plan II-1 B. Service Area II-1 C. Population Estimates II-1 D. Land Use and Zoning I1-2 E. Economic Considerations II-4 III EXISTING FACILITIES A. Wastewater System Along WCR 74 III-1 B. Remainder of Town III-1 C. Water Supply System III-1 IV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Weld County Regulations IV-1 • B. Existing Compliance With Regulations IV-1 C. State Health Department Regulations IV-1 V WASTEWATER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS A. Sewage Flows V-1 B. Sewage Composition V-2 C. Wasteload Projections V-2 VI ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS A. General VI-1 B. Collection Systems VI-1 C. Treatment Systems VI-1 1 . Stabilization Ponds VI-2 2. Aerated Sewage Lagoons VI-3 3. Activated Sludge Systems VI-3 D. Alternate Sewage Collection VI-4 880925 SECTION SUBJECT PAGE VII COST CONSIDERATIONS A. General VII-1 B. Collection System VII-1 C. Treatment System VII-1 D. Cost Estimates VII-3 VIII RECOMMENDED PLAN FOR FINANCING A. Tap Fees VIII-1 B. Grants and Loans VIII-2 1. Farmers Home Administration VIII-2 2. Colorado Division of Local Affairs VIII-2 C. Service Fees VIII-2 IX DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND VALUATION IX-1 X CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Conclusions X-1 B. Recommendations X-1 MAPS EXHIBIT II=1 Locations Map II-5 II-2 Existing Buildings and Lots II-6 III-1 Existing Sewer Facility III-3 VI-1 Collection System Map VI-5 APPENDIX A DISTRICT BOUNDARY X-2 530925 SECTION I SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION A. SUMMARY The Galeton community is in need of improved wastewater collection and treat— ment facilities in order to grow and to improve the sanitation of the area for the adults and children living in the area. An existing sewage collection and treatment system serving aportion of the town is inadequate and in violation of Weld County, and State of Colorado regulations. It needs to be replaced. The Triangle Cross Ranch on the North side of the community has intentions of adding new residential houses and will need an adequate wastewater treatment system. The Farmers Home Administration office which deals with housing loans has refused to loan money for new homes in Galeton. This report shows that the least expensive alternate for improving the sanitation environment in the community is to construct a new wastewater collection system and a stabilization lagoon system for treatment of the wastewater. This can be financed by a loan and grant from the Farmers Home Administration in addition to tap fees to be assessed to all the users. A grant from the Weld County Hous— ing Authority will assist low income residents in affording the Tap Fee and the cost of their service line. B. CONCLUSION The Galeton Civic Association should proceed with formation of the Galeton Water and Sanitation District. Then the newly formed District should: 1. Contract for the services of the Attorney and the Engineer, 2. Apply for State approval for constructing the proposed collection and treatment system, 3. Obtain a grant and loan from Farmers Home Administration, 4. Investigate other funding that may be available, 5. Authorize design of a wastewater collection and treatment system, 6. Take bids for the system, 7. Contract for construction of the system, 8. Assess Service Fees and begin repayment of the loan. I-1 880925 SECTION II GENERAL INFORMATION A. PURPOSE OF PLAN The community of Galeton has reached a point in its life where improvements in the public facilities need to be made in order for the community to survive. A good source of water has been available for a number of years. The density of the housing somewhat controls the ability to make improvements to the roads, lawns, shrubs, and other aesthetic and health features in town. Individual sewage systems (septic tanks and leach fields) need large areas and ample sep- aration between them and the houses in order to prevent hazardous conditions. The community first needs a sewage collection and treatment system before it can address the other aspects of community improvement. A significant number of the residents realize this fact and have formed the Galeton Civic Association in order to start the process of community improvement. They wish to form the Galeton Water and Sanitation District first so as to have a viable government body to address the problem. Colorado statues providing for such action require that the County Planning Commission, the County Commissioners, and the State Courts be fully informed as to the need for and viability of a quasi-municipal organization prior to authorizing its formation. State and Federal funding authorities also need this information prior to granting and loaning funds to the community for con- structing the necessary improvements. This Service Plan addresses those informational needs by presenting data on the population, facility needs and requirements, economics, existing develop— ments, and a plan for improving the community. B. SERVICE AREA The area now known as Galeton was subdivided in 1909 as the town of ZITA. An area of .61 acres on the south side of Weld County Road 74 in Sections 5 - 6 - 64 and 6 - 6 - 64 was included in the initial subdivision and the First Addition to VATA. This subdivided area is partially developed into homes and businesses. In addi- tion, an area North of WCR 74 and West of Weld County Road 51 has been split into 10 parcels of land that are developed into commercial and residential sites. This area is shown on the maps at the end of this section, Exhibit II-1 and Ex- hibit II-2. The proposed boundaries of the District are also shown on these maps. A recent development in Galeton is the Triangle Cross Ranch, Inc. North of the development discussed above. This organization provides a home environment for individuals that need a semi sheltered home. The Board of Directors is plann- ing to construct additional homes in the area and will need wastewater treatment. C. POPULATION ESTIMATES The population of Galeton has fluctuated up and down over the years as businesses have come and gone. The Union Pacific Railway served the area with tracks and facilities adjacent to Main Street but has long since discontinued service and removed the railroad tracks. A record of these population changes is not avail— able because the community has never incorporated as a town and is split by U.S. Census Districts. At present there are 44 housing units in Galeton that could be serviced by a sew- age collection and treatment system. In addition there is a grade school with 177 students and 21 teachers and full time employees, two churches, a Lions Club II-1 880925 building, a grocery store, a service station and several other facilities that may need sewer service. A recent survey made by the Weld County Housing Authority showed the following: Number of houses surveyed 28 Number of people 85 Average per household 3.0 Using this average occupancy per house results in a population of 132 at present. The store, churches, and service station are each the equivalent of 4 person for wastewater contribution during a week. The school in Galeton has 177 students, 21 faculty and service personnel and several bus drivers. It serves students from kindergarten through the fourth grade and has a gymnasium with showers and a cafeteria. Using Weld County Health Department criteria, the school is equivalent to 50 people (5000 gallons per day) . A new septic tank and leach field system have recently been constructed at the school so it might not be added to the system until sometime after the system is in operation. The subdivided area of Galeton that is suitable and available for residential development, 6 square blocks, would accommodate an additional 30 to 35 homes and additional 6 to 10 businesses. The Triangle Cross Ranch will probably add 5 to 10 homes in the area north of WCR 74. Since water is available, it is reasonable to plan for doubling the present wastewater load if the additional capacity can be provided with only a small, 15%±, increase in the cost of the treatment facility. D. LAND USE AND ZONING The entire community of Galeton and the surrounding area is zoned Agricultural. Farming is a predominant use of the land adjoining the community. New homes and businesses in the proposed service area are permittted after the owner obtains a building permit from the County Building Department. It is expected that some new homes will be built on vacant lots and that new businesses may start up on the vacant land previously occupied by the Union Pacific. The zoning does not include a land use catagory for a wastewater treatment faci— lity, either lagoons or mechanical plants. This use can be permitted only after approval of a "Use By Special Review". An application for the land use must be submitted to the Weld County Planning Commission for consideration at the same time that a State Health Department application for Site Approval is submitted. The two applications will follow similar paths to the Weld County Board of Commissioners for approval. Then the Site Approval application will go to the State Health Department. The criteria for approval of a Wastewater Treatment site is as follows: 2.2.5 CRITERIA FOR DIVISION OR COMMISSION DECISION MAKING (1) The Division shall review the site application and report, and in making its determination as to whether or not to approve or deny, shall consider a number of factors including: (a) Designation of the legally responsible entity and the legal description of the location; 11-2 880925 (b) The existing domestic wastewater treatment facilities and feasibility or cost effectiveness of treating wastes in an areawide facility as it relates to long-range planning. (c) Relationship to and potential effect of proposed faci- lity on any water supply intake; (d) In accordance with the policy declared in 2.2.3 (2)(7) the ability of the applicant to manage the site to minimize the potential adverse impacts on water quality; (e) Location of proposed project to any flood plain; (f) Impact on public health, welfare, and safety; (g) Proper notice; (h) Review and comment of all required local government agencies and all planning agencies including recommendations for approval or disapproval with any conditions which should be a part of the Division approval; (i) Long-range comprehensive planning for the area as it affects water quality; and (j) The policies set forth in 2.2.3. (2) The Division will act expeditiously on all complete applications which have been submitted. The Division will ask for review and comments from other agencies; however, the Division will make the final decision regarding approval or disapproval of the application (3) If the application is denied, the Division will specify which items were not satisfied by the application and what measures the applicant may take, if any, to satisfy requirements. (4) All site approvals become effective on the date of approval by the Division and will expire one year from the date of approval. Any project not commencing construction on or before that date must reapply or request a time extension. If there are no sig— nificant changes from the original application, this can be accomplished by a letter request. II-3 880925 E. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS Galeton is a community with a large percentage of low to moderate income families so the monthly fee per household for operation, maintenance, and loan repay- ment must be kept as low as possible. The census data for the area includes the farming community north, east and south of Galeton so it includes many non- urban families. However, this data shows that more than half of the house- holds have an annual income of less than $17,500. 1980 census dats shows the following: North of WCR 74 South of WCR 74 Median Annual Income $9,886 $14,943 Mean Annual Income $20,121 $16,456 A recent survey of Galeton for which 28 of the 40± households responded shows that 14 of the 28 families have a gross annual income below $15,000. The monthly cost for sewer service should not exceed $20.00 in order for it to be affordable by these low to moderate income families. Grants—in—aid must be obtained to cover at least half of the cost of sewer lines and the treatment system. Grant money for a portion of the cost may be available through the Colorado Division of Local Affairs. The money would come from the Energy Impact Fund or from the Community Development Block Grant Funds. An application for a grant has been prepared, and it is a request for funds to improve the homes for low and moderate income families as well as pay for the service line construction and the plant investment fee. The Farmers Home Administration is the primary Federal agency that assists in rural projects such as this one. An application for a loan and a grant has been submittted to FmHA. The community fits the criteria for loan and grant funds and may be able to receive primary funding from that source. The monthly sewer fees will include interest, loan repayment, operation, and maintenance costs. Attempts should be made to keep the 0. and M. costs as low as possible by designing around facilities without mechanical and electrical equipment. 830925 II-4 iiiii asit'(_ J� "..ctrcti- ' i y �c\ .+ei. \i I m` I.Xr--- ______----el ..tr,�� • \ .. i <eo � �`I II I e r° � 0 N 136, . 31 / . I 32 " = 200K �P'OPOSED \' \ II dI le Si ' r BO1TRI BAR 1. \ ' '. aleto _Iril k tts \ N---.---------- ::: , :ry �� 1 • , (7/ TER Q t`�` WASTEW I / � ,J . � J aII, (. ' — f<6 <7B9 5 CQ.-- — -- _ ZS k-- yam I 01 'n SI• ;7ia ..I.� t 4727 . 47 I 1� 7 L I fli' / _ J 9 re IR65W \ R64W I <JJe GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WELD COUNTY. COLORADO LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT II-1 II-5 3'0925 I a TRIANGLE CROSS RANCH in WCR74 1st ST ID El © a a EJ" ram O as DB 6 ' 2nd WELL 0 0 t El ® a a a o 1 IE N O d 5 6 © o nID 3rd ST La • o ° u a U W a1 U [pH7�J. a 0 • H HOUSE C CHURCH 1;‘1 �- 1411 MOBILE HOME S SCHOOL - G GROCERY D DUPLEX b R REPAIR SHOP & GAS P- 200 3 W WAREHOUSE GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WELD COUNTY, COLORADO EXISTING BUILDINGS AND LOTS II-6 EXHIBIT II-2 880925 SECTION III EXISTING FACILITIES A. WASTEWATER SYSTEM ALONG WCR 74 A community wastewater system has been serving some of the residents in Gale- ton. Six homes along the north side of First Street, five homes near Pleasant Hill Avenue, the two churches, the Fire House, the grocery store, and the ser- vice station have a sewage collection system that flows eastward in First Street to a leach field east of Main Street and west of Willow Creek. The leach field is not functioning properly and the septic tank effluent is now flowing in an open ditch to Willow Creek. It flows southward in Willow Creek which crosses WCR 51 a half mile south of Galeton. Willow Creek runs into Lone Tree Creek about 2.3 miles southwest of Galeton, and Lone Tree Creek enters the South Platte River seven miles south of Galeton. The cooperative system was started in 1929 and has been enlarged and repaired several time since then. The system does not comply with Weld County and State Department of Health standards in several catagories: 1. The sewer collection lines are all 4 inch diameter, the standard and requirements specify that 8 inch should be used. 2. The septic tank is 3000 gallons (2-1500 gallon tanks) the proper size for about 36 people (12 equivalent homes x 3 x 150%) is a capacity of 5200 gallons. 3. The leach field consists of 590 lineal feet of pipe. For a flow of 5200 gallons per day, this would require a percolation rate of less than one minute per inch. However, the percolation rate at the Triangle Cross Ranch north of WCR 74 is 22.5 minutes per inch. The percolation rate at the leach field location near Willow Creek is probably more nearly 20 to 30 minutes per inch, and the leach field is only about 5 to 10 percent as large as it should be. This • inadequacy in leaching capacity is probably a major factor causing the failure of the system. Some corrective measures or entire re- placement of the collection and treatment system will be necessary to cure the problem. B. REMAINDER OF TOWN The other homes in Galeton utilize septic tank and leach field systems for treating and disposing of household wastewater. Percolation rates in the community are probably 10 to 30 minutes per inch. A leach line system with 2 feet wide trenchs should have a total length of trench equal to 165 feet minimum to 250 feet or more for a two bedroom house. A system of these sizes would certainly occupy most of the available rear lot and/or front lot for most of the homes. Most of the systems were probably installed prior to these formalized regulations and are probably inadequate. At least three of the homes are on 25 foot wide lots which certainly are in— adequate in size to accommodate a septic tank and leach field complying with Weld County Regulations for Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. It is a sit- uation that can best be solved by the installation of a community wide sewage collection and treatment system. C. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Galeton residents joined together years ago to provide a potable water system for the town. They own a water well, pressure tank, and distribution lines III-1 830925 that serves 18 homes. Several homeowners have their own well for household water. The other homes in Galeton receive water from North Weld County Water District which supplys adequately treated water from Horsetooth Lake via a filter plant near Fort Collins. The Galeton water system does not provide chlorination or other treatment of the water, but it is tested for bacteria and is safe to use. One resident has a replaceable water filter on his supply line which becomes plugged after a months use. This may be caused by organic growths in the well or in the lines or by fine particles of sand and clay that enter the well with the water. An analysis of the residue on a filter of this type would show what the contamin- ation is, and then steps could be taken to aleviate the problem. The water supply system for Galeton appears to be adequate and will not re- quire immediate work. Efforts should be made first to cure the wastewater prob- lem. 880925 III-2 a TRIANGLE CROSS M rli RANCH 2 - 1500 GAL. in SEPTIC TANKS El a u 1" I 0 a O ©N IE El r� N / i � " EXISTING SEWER-" " iWeu. IA CJ 12 El " a c]© o o IN < '�y1 © © rn , n T, ST , N El O: ID '�' S: r < hz-i ❑M N 6 �]S • ai a c� C CHURCH '-"----__, H HOUSE S SCHOOL MH MOBILE HOME iii ,.. D DUPLEX °G in G GROCERY /"= 200� 3 R REPAIR SHOP & GAS W WAREHOUSE GALEPON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WELD COUNTY COLORADO EXISTING SEWER FACILITY EXHIBIT III-1 III-3 880925 SECTION IV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. WELD COUNTY REGULATIONS Since Galeton is not an incorporated community under Colorado State Laws, the development regulations are those adopted by the Weld County Commissioners. These are: 1. Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations that covers septic systems, evapotranspiration systems, alternate designs, and effluent discharged directly to waters of the State. 2. Uniform Building Code that covers primarily construction of homes, commercial buildings, and industrial buildings. 3. Other planning and zoning regulations that regulate the type of busi- ness and construction. B. STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS Items of water supply and wastewater disposal are covered by Colorado Depart— ment of Health regulations as follows: 1. Regulations Establishing Basic Standards and an Antidegradation Standard. 2. Regulations for the State Discharge Permit System. 3. Regulations for Effluent Limitations. 4. Design Criteria for Wastewater Treatment Works. 5. Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treat— ment Works. 6. Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems. Other State regulations cover additional aspects of the health maintenance aspects, but the above regulations and standards embody the bulk of the items which will be covered in the work proposed for Galeton. C. EXISTING COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS A number of non-compliance items have been discussed in previous sections of this report. The non-compliance includes not only the discharge of septic tank effluent into Willow Creek, but also the possible non-compliance of a large number of individual septic tank/leach field systems in the community. The situations present in the community with regard to the wastewater disposal systems present a hazard to all the residents of Galeton. The danger to child- ren is especially high because of their inquisitive nature and their lack of knowledge and experience with wastewater. The bacteria, viruses, and cysts that are present in residential wastewater are not destroyed in non-complying wastewater treatment and disposal systems. Numerous illnesses of community residents are directly attributable to non-compliance with health standards. The elimination of these community hazards is a very important project for Galeton to undertake. IV-1 880925 SECTION V COMMUNITY WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS A. SEWAGE FLOWS The existing sewage collection system in Galeton serves a variety of uses as well as the eleven homes. No attempts have been made to measure the quantity of flow in this system. It is doubtful that a flow measurement would be of value for designing a sewage treatment system capacity. The household use varies hourly, daily, and seasonally so much that an effort to measure a long term flow rate would unnecessarily delay the project. Measurements of flow in many other communities have been used to establish design criteria that is rea- sonable for establishing design flow rates. State Health Department criteria specifies the use of 100 gallons per person per day. Weld County criteria specifies 75 gallons per person per day. Weld County Regulations also specify the use of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling unit or two persons per bedroom . The housing survey of 28 homes in Galeton showed an average of 3.0 persons per house. Using Weld County criteria results in a flow rate of 262 gallons per day per dwelling unit. Using existing population and Colorado State Health Department criteria results in a flow rate of 300 gallons per day per dwelling unit. For purposes of this Service Plan, the higher flow rate of 300 gallons per day per housing unit will be used. Other daily flow rates from Weld County or En— vironmental Protection Agency criteria will be used as follows: 1. Grocery Store 300 gallons per day 2. Service station/garage 250 gallons per day 3. Church 100 gallons per day (700 gal/week) 4. Fire Station 50 gallons per day (350 gal/week) 5. Lions Clubhouse 50 gallons per day (350 gal/week) 6. Triangle Cross Homes 200 gallons per bedroom per day 7. School 25 gallons per day per person The present (1988) design flow for a sewage collection system serving units is as follows: 44 Dwelling Units @ 300 gpd = 13,200 1 Grocery Store @ 300 gpd = 300 2 Service Station &/or 500 Garage @ 250 gpd = 2 Churchs @ 100 gpd = 200 1 Fire Station @ 50 gpd = 50 1 Lions Club @ 50 gpd = 50 1 Triangle Cross (5 Br.) @ 1000 gpd = 1,000 TOTAL 15,300 gpd V-1 880925 If the school becomes a part of the system, the present design load to add to the system is: 198 Students and adults @ 25 gpd = 4,950 gpd This wastewater flow represents an addition of 1/3 to the treatment load. Many of the residents have expresssed the belief that the schools leach field will fail in the near future. This is based only on their experience with other leach fields in the area, and not on any design data or calculations. Additional loading for the system in the future could be as much as: 35 Dwellings Units @ 300 gpd = 10,500 gpd 6 Businesses @ 100 gpd = 600 gpd 10 Triangle Cross Homes @ 1000 gpd = 10,000 gpd TOTAL 21,100 gpd When all these homes and businesses are built and all the wastewater is piped to a treatment unit, the total flow will be: 15,300 + 4,950 + 21,100 = 41,350 gallons per day B. SEWAGE COMPOSITION It is anticipated that there will be no industrial sewage contributors in Galeton. The primarily residential sewage will contain less than 0.20 pounds of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) per 100 gallons of wastewater. However, this value will be used for design purposes so as to provide for future increases to that wastewater content. The BOD will be primarily from kitchen and bathroom wastes and will not contain toxic chemicals in any great concentrations. The wastewater should be treatable by ordinary treatment methods. The entire collection system will be newly installed so the infiltration/exfil- tration should be minimal. Therefore dilution of the wastewater will not occur and the design strength will be 250 parts per million (milligrams per liter) of biodegradable organics. The wastewater will be easily treatable in a small mechanical treatment plant, or in a naturally or a mechanically aerated lagoon treatment system. C. WASTELOAD PROJECTIONS Galeton has remained relatively constant in population during the past decade. There are several rental units in the community and there have been several mobile homes that have been moved into the area and then moved out, but the net changes in population have not been great. The wastewater will all be from residential uses and will have design parameters as follows: (based on an 80% initial hookup and 3% per year growth) V-2 880925 YEAR FLOW RATE, GPD BOD LOAD, Lbs/day 1989 12,000 25.0 1990 14,000 29.2 1995 16,100 36.4 2000 18,500 38.5 2005 21,300 44.4 2010 24,500 51.0 The Triangle Cross Ranch anticipates building two or more housing units during the next few years. The wastewater load from these units alone would more than make up this entire growth projection to the year 2000. Also additional homes in or near town may elect to hook up to the system as the price for maintenance of individual systems increases. The total 21 year projected growth in wastewater flow could be the result of the following additions to the system: 9 Triangle Cross Ranch Homes 9000 gpd 10 Homes 3000 gpd 2 Businesses 500 gpd TOTAL 12,500 gpd It is recommended that a design loading equal to the year 2010 be used for de- sign of the wastewater treatment system for Galeton. the following estimated costs are for a 25,000 gallon per day wastewater treat- ment plant. This size of system is far too large to consider a septic tank/ leach field treatment system. The design flow fits into the capabilities of the units in the tabulation. • V-3 880925 SECTION VI WASTEWATER SYSTEM OPTIONS A. GENERAL Whenever the density of housing in a localized area becomes great enough to preclude the proper land area for septic tanks and leach fields, an alternate system must be developed. The existence of tight, clayey soils which easily become plugged with wastewater solids hastens the need for a community wide sewage collection system. The community of Galeton has reached the saturation point for individual systems and further growth will be delayed until an ade— quate collection and treatment system is provided. In the meantime, existing single family septic tank/leach field systems will continue to fail as solids accumulate in the leaching areas. The lack of adequate septic tank cleaning frequency and the increase in organic materials from garbage disposers in homes hastens the failure rate. Continued restrictions on the disposal of septic tank sludges has increased the cost of adequate, once—a—year, cleaning to about $250.00. For this annual cost, a community—wide collection and treatment sys— tem could be financed if partial funding with grant funds can be obtained. B. COLLECTION SYSTEM Galeton is built upon a slight rise of ground west of Willow Creek. The general slope is to the south with the Eastern portion of town draining to the East and the South Western portion of town sloping westerly. A sewage collection sys- tem with main sewers oriented north-south in the alleys could adequately serve the entire town by gravity. The residents and businesses along Weld Co. Road 74 (First Street) could be served by a main line running east-west along the north side of the road. This arrangement of sewer lines is shown on the COL- LECTION SYSTEM MAP. Other arrangements of the sewer lines have been considered such as running sewer lines in the east-west streets, or in the north-south streets , but these use more pipe and cost more. Materials for the sewer lines are PVC Plastic Pipe, Clay Tile, Concrete, and Asbestos Cement Pipe. PVC Plastic is the pipe of choice today because of its durability, low cost, ease of installation, ease of tapping, water tightness, and long life. The State Health Department requires a minimum size of 8 inches to allow for ease in maintenance and cleaning. Sewer manholes are constructed of concrete, PVC, or Fiberglass. Any of these are adequate but the usual material of choice is precast concrete because of its durability, rigidity, ease of construction, and long life. The manhole base can be either precast or cast-in-place at the contractors option. All joints in the manholes should be sealed with mastic, and all joints in the pipe should be sealed with a rubber gasket. A rubber "0" Ring should be used at the joint between the pipe and the manhole. These pre- cautions reduce the infiltration of groundwater and, hence, reduce the size of the treatment systems required for the community. C. TREATMENT SYSTEMS The selection of the optimum process for an individual community should not be based exclusively on the economics of the individual processes capable of satisfying discharge requirements. Many of the technical and social factors VI-1 880925 should be considered in evaluation of viable alternatives. Community charac— teristics such as growth rate, land cost and availability, proximity of treat— ment facilities to residential or commercial areas, available operator capa— bilities, and treatment facility aesthetics effects (visual and odor) on the community all have a bearing on the treatment facilities best suited for a given community. There are a great number of alternative treatment processes capable of satis— fying BOD and suspended solids (SS) discharge requirements. The alternatives discussed in the following sections are those which have been found suitable for small communities. Processes requiring extremely sophisticated operator capabilities generally unavailable in small communities such as continuous operator monitoring, etc. , are not considered in this report. There are two major treatment plant classifications: biological and physical/ chemical. Both types of processes have the same objective--removal of dissolved and particulate organic material. Biological treatment processes, some of which have been used since the turn of the century, depend on microorganisms to con- vert putrescible substances to less noxious chemical forms which are compatible with the environment. Controlled biological processes are those such as acti- vated sludge or biofilter in which the biological growth conditions are arti- fically controlled; stabilization ponds or aerated lagoons are considered un- controlled biological processes. Physical/chemical treatment consists of the addition of various chemicals to aggregate and to aid settling particulate matter and to oxidize organic substances. Depending on the particular effluent quality goals, physical/chemical plants may employ multimedia filtration, acti- vated carbon absorption, ozonation or any one of several other processes. While there are several small physical/chemical package plants currently on the mar- ket, none will be considered in view of their stringent operational require- ments. C. 1 STABILIZATION PONDS When stored in shallow ponds, domestic wastewater may be effectively stabilized by natural biological processes involving symbiosis between bacteria and algae. Bacteria degrade the wastewater and produce carbon dioxide; algae utilize the carbon dioxide and produce oxygen which is required by the bacteria. This symbiotic relationship requires the presence of a healthy growth of algae which occurs when pond depths are less than 6 to 10 feet. The algae which supply oxygen for the biodegradation of the wastewater do not completely settle and are present as suspended solids in the pond effluent. In consideration of the fact that algae are inherently different from wastewater solids in composi- tion, the Environmental Protection Agency has recently recommended that the suspended solids effluent requirement for lagoons be made more lenient. The EPA has recommended that each state set the maximum allowable suspended solids concentration for lagoon systems under their jurisdiction. This level has been set by Colorado as being 105 parts per million in place of the usual 30ppm for other treatment systems. A stabilization pond is basically a shallow pond (3 to 5 feet deep) in which the wastewater is stored for 30 to 120 days. In some cold climate areas where freezing of the receiving streams occurs, it has been the practice to provide pond storage of all wastewater through the winter until the spring thaw when adequate dilution water is available in the receiving stream. The maximum BOD loading per unit volume of pond is limited by the amount of available oxygen VI-2 880925 produced by the algae and supplied by surface reaeration. Both of these sources of oxygen are directly related to the surface area of a lagoon since algae growth in deep ponds is limited by light availability. A stabilization pond is considered an uncontrolled biological treatment pro— cess since the amount of active biomass in the system cannot be adjusted or regulated. In cold climates where lagoon water approaches freezing, maximum BOD loading rates are approximately 15 to 20 pounds BOD per acre per day. This is equivalent to approximately 100 people per acre of water surface. Operation and maintenance requirements for stabilization ponds are the lowest for any secondary treatment process. It is this 0 & M factor combined with low capital costs that causes the wide use of stabilization ponds by small com- munities. Stabilization ponds do, however, have several disadvantages includ- ing: 1) large land requirements; 2) odor problems two or three time a year when temperature inversions occur and cause the ponds to "turn over" bringing up septic odorous liquid from the lower depths; and 3) the effluent is loaded with algae and may be unsuitable for certain reuse. A significant advantage of stabilization pond systems is that sludge remains in the pond and sludge hand- ling and disposal problems are minimized. The power and chemical requirements are also minimal. C. 2 AERATED SEWAGE LAGOON Increased BOD loading rates and therefore smaller land requirements are pos— sible in a pond system if a supplemental supply of oxygen can be provided. Such systems commonly referred to as aerated lagoons, aerated ponds, aerated oxidation ponds, etc. , are generally provided with supplemental oxygen by either mechanical surface aerators or a diffused aeration system. Supplemental oxy- gen can increase maximum BOD loading rates into the range of 100 to 200 pounds BOD per acre per day depending on the temperature of the lagoon water. Even with the supplemental oxygen supply, aerated lagoons, like stabilization ponds, are considered uncontrolled biological processes. Aerated lagoons have several advantages over stabilization ponds, including: 1) much smaller land requirements due to the greater maximum BOD loading rate, 2) lower probability of odor problems since supplemental oxygen is supplied and the pond liquid is completely mixed, and 3) production of better quality effluent during the winter months when an ice layer may develop. Aerated lagoons do have greater 0 & M requirements than stabilization ponds due to the energy, requirements and maintenance associated with the aeration equipment. Aerated lagoon effluents, like those of stabilization ponds, contain large amounts of algae which cause the effluents to exceed the suspended solids discharge re- quirement of 30 ppm for mechanical treatment plant effluents. C. 3 ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEMS Activated sludge is the name given to a process that utilizes aerobic bacteria for changing organic wastes, ie. plant and animal matter, in the sewage to re— latively inert materials such as carbon dioxide, water, cellulose, and other compounds. Various modifications utilizing different types of equipment and varying amounts of power are being used. VI-3 330925 Extended aeration is a modified activated sludge process suitable for use by small communities. Basically raw wastewater is aerated for 24 hours in a tank containing a high concentration of activated sludge microorganisms which break down the waste substances. The mixture of water and sludge is then sent to a clarifier or settling tank where the activated sludge organisms are separated from the liquid. The settled sludge is returned to the aeration tank and the clear wastewater is discharged. Depending on the discharge quality require- ments, disinfection of the final outflow may be required. The major mechanical equipment required for an extended aeration plant are aerators (diffused or mechanical) and sludge return pumps. External separate sludge digestion facilities are not required since digestion occurs while the sludge is in the aeration circuit (internal digestion) . A relatively small aerated sludge holding tank enabling uniform wasting of sludge from the aeration circuit is required. Depending on local conditions, sludge is generally pumped to sludge drying beds for dewatering and subsequent trucking to sanitary land- fills, disposed of by land treatment, or trucked as a liquid to an appropriate disposal site. The sludge is very stable biologically and creates few odor problems. However, an extended aeration plant does require a relatively highly trained oerator. The oxidation ditch is a modification of the extended aeration-activated sludge process which utilizes a closed loop channel as an aeration chamber. The pro- cess was originally intended to be a low cost system requiring non-sophisticated construction methods and mechanical equipment. The process flow scheme con- sists of aeration of raw wastewater in the loop channel followed by the sedi- mentation of the activated sludge in a clarifier. The activated sludge (act- ive microorganisms) is returned from the clarifier back to the aeration tank. Brush aerators are used to supply oxygen and to retain solids in suspension in the aeration channel. Internal sludge digestion occurs and eliminates the requirement for external sludge digestion facilities in lightly loaded plants. Sludge can be dis- posed of by methods such as land treatment, liquid sanitary landfill, or by drying on sludge drying beds and trucking to a sanitary landfill or to agri- cultural fields. The biological stability of the oxidation ditch process results in one of the lowest operation and maintenance requirements of any of the controlled biolog- ical treatment processes. This is a significant advantage for small communities where highly trained operators might not be readily available. D. ALTERNATE SEWAGE COLLECTION An alternate sewage collection system that has been considered uses septic tanks on each individual lot and small size sewer lines to the lagoons that carry only the effluent. This system costs slightly less initially, but the annual or semi-annual cost of pumping out the septic tanks, $150.00, null- ifies any initial cost savings. This pumping fee will ammortize an initial expenditure of $2065 (30 year loan at 6%) if it is done annually in accord- ance with Weld County regulations. This will more than pay for the difference in pipe sizing of 4" for one and 8" pipe for a conventional system. Since this alternate sewage collection system requires considerably more attention and management time at little or no cost advantage, it is not recommended for use at Galeton. VI-4 880925 . 1 A t 2 1in il II l- Clir"-J 6 2 CR74.�Q S _..___ S - S _ _ =--o 1st 1s ST— J H N F O-1 El Ily 0 h 0 1 oED 0 0 . nd ST © 11H ® ---® © - © 12 , _ H __ � y a © 0, W W Wa a c ti WDE s I 3rd ST ‘4Oy \ PAP © % U o� a a U 4th ST PROPOSED SEWER LINES I H HOUSE CHURCH N MOBILE HOME SCHOOL $ i GROCERY 4 DUPLEX r=2001 3 h REPAIR SHOP & GAS 1 W WAREHOUSE GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT WELD COUNTY COLORADO COLLECTION SYSTEM MAP • VI-5 EXHIBIT VI-1 880925 SECTION VII COST CONSIDERATIONS A. GENERAL Any cost comparison must include the cost of land, constructed items on the site, mechanical and electrical equipment, and instrumentation reduced to an annual cost for loan repayments and interest. In addition, the annual cost of repairs, operating labor, electricity, and maintenance of equipment must be estimated. The total of these costs can then be compared as an annual or monthly cost to each customer. B. COLLECTION SYSTEM The two alternates for wastewater collection systems that can be studied are a conventional system in accordance with State Health Department Criteria and an alternate system of septic tanks at each service and a small collection line that carries only the liquid portion of the sewage. The solids collected in the septic tanks would be emptied every year. Service to 50 homes and busi— nesses will be used as a basis for costs. Item Description Quantity Cost Conventional Alternate System System 1. 8" Sewer Collection Line 5100' 13.00 66,3000 2. 4" Sewer Collection Line 5100' 6.00 30,600 3. Septic Tanks, 1000 gal. 30 1000.00 30,000 4. Sanitary Manholes 15 1500.00 22,500 22,500 5. Paved Road Crossings 2 2000.00 4,000 4,000 6. Outfall Sewer, 8" 1500' 13.00 19,500 7. Outfall Sewer, 6" 1500' 12.00 18,000 8. Sanitary Manholes 6 1500.00 9,000 9. Reserve for cleaning septic tanks * 75,000 TOTAL $ 121,300 $ 180,100 * A $75,000 C.D. at 10% interest will earn $7500 per year to pay for clean— ing the 50 septic tanks at $150.00 each. Although a sewage collection system utilizing septic tanks and small collection lines might be less costly to install at the present time, the annual charge for cleaning the tanks must be provided for in the financing. This annual cost whether paid by the District or by monthly fees added to each customer's bill, still costs the Galeton residents the same and must be taken into account in the initial cost comparisons. It is apparent that a conventional sewage collection system is lower in cost than the alternate. C. TREATMENT SYSTEM A wastewater treatment system for Galeton will need to be designed for a growth rate far greater than larger communities. The area has vacant land already sub- divided which will accommodate almost double the present population. The com- munity has a good school system, a good water system, adequate access to more metropolitan areas for jobs and shopping, and with the addition of a good waste- water collection and treatment system, more families will opt for the rural at- mosphere. VII-1 '0 • 925 Estimated costs of three wastewater treatment systems are shown in the follow- ing table. Each of the systems is capable of accepting the added wasteload as Galeton grows. Either of the lagoon systems could be built for about the same cost but the Stabilization Pond system has a much lower operating cost. This system is recommended for construction by the Galeton Water and Sanitation Dis- trict. GALETON SEWERAGE COSTS ITEM STABILIZATION AERATED ACTIVATED POND LAGOON SLUDGE LAND * 5 Acres 2 Acres 1 Acre & $20,000 $8,000 $4,000 SOIL TESTS $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $2,000 SITE WORK $ 37,600 $16,000 $10,000 PIPING & MECHANICAL $21,000 $42,000 $130,000 EQUIPMENT CHLORINATION $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $10,000 PROCESS & (10' x 20') (30' x 60') CONTROL -0- $6,000 $45,000 BUILDING EMERGENCY GENERATOR Not Required $5,000 $15,000 CAPITAL COST $ 84,600 $ 80,000 $ 216,000 * Land costs are based on a price of $4,000 per acre. VII-2 880925 D. COST ESTIMATE In addition to the construction costs shown in the above paragraphs, there will be legal and publication costs for formation of the District, engineering costs for the planning, design, and resident inspection of the system, incidental costs for establishing an office and secretary, and fees for recording deeds, for county road cuts, for insurance, for bonds for officers, for postage, and other incidentals. All of these costs are included in the following cost estimate. After the District is formed, the residents of Galeton inside the boundaries will all be members and will be expected to start using the facilities. The elected board of directors will set policies as to when residents must abandon their existing facilities. These rules will have a bearing on the finances of the District. For purposes of this report, it is assumed that 40 of the existing 50 buildings will be connected to the new wastewater system. GALETON WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT COST ESTIMATE FOR SEWERAGE SYSTEM Item Description Cost 1. Sewer Collection System $ 121,300 2. Stabilization Lagoons 84,600 3. Land, 5 acres 20,000 4. Service taps 8,100 5. Engineering, Legal, Administration , etc. 36,000 TOTAL $ 270,000 This amount will need to be financed by tap fees, a loan, and grants. An alternate to the construction of a whole new system for the 16 users of the system along WCR 74 is to try to improve their existing treatment system. Of first importance after obtaining County and State permits would be construction of an adequate leach field. It is estimated that a leaching area of 10,000 square feetis required. This will cost $2.50 per square foot or $25,000 for construc- tion and about $5,000 for permits and design. Unit cost per tap is $1,875.00 without provision for additional users. The proposed entirely new system cap- able of serving 80 taps has a unit cost of $3,375.00 per tap. It is doubtful, however, that either the County or the State would permit this upgrading with- out upgrading the sewage collection line and septic tank capacity. These costs per user would be approximately equal to that of the proposed community-wide system. VII-3 530925 SECTION VIII PLAN FOR FINANCING A. TAP FEES A portion of the money for financing any system is normally a down payment, here called a tap fee. The tap fee will be set by the Board of Directors of the Galeton Water and Sanitation District. The usual practice is to set the tap fee lower than average at the start of the project and then increase it after the project is in operation. This encourages residents to join in the initial stages which decreases the unit cost of construction by increasing the number of repetitive tasks. A comparison of tap fees in Northern Colorado was made and studied by the mem— bers of the Galeton Civic Association. After discussion of the fees shown on the Tap Fees list the members selected a tap fee of $750.00 for the initial signup of customers. This is slightly lower than the average shown on the list. The funds for construction generated by this tap fee for construction for 40 initial taps will be: $750 x 40 = $ 30,000 SEWERAGE SYSTEM TAP FEES AND RATES March, 1988 COMMUNITY TAP FEE OR PLANT MONTHLY INVESTMENT FEE USE FEE 1. Eaton $ 900 $ 6.00 2. Ault 750 6.50 3. Pierce 1000 12.00 4. Windsor 950 9.10 5. Kersey 1050 11.00 6. Evans 375 3.25 7. Milliken 2200 16.50 8. Lyons 3000 12.00 9. Berthoud 1250 -10. Fort Collins 1600 11.26 11. Greeley 1365 12.71 12. Platteville 2000 9.75 Most communities also have a fee or make a charge for the construction cost of the main line tap and the service line to the lot line. This cost amounts to $150 to $250 and is assessed to the home owner in addition to the tap fee. The Board of Directors can determine whether this charge should be made. VIII-1 380925 B. GRANTS AND LOANS 1. Amount Needed. The total construction financing as stated above is $270,000. Tap fees of $30,000 will reduce this amount to $240,000. In addition, an amount equal to one years interest will need to be set aside so it is available to pay the first years interest on the loan. The money will be earning interest during the construction period when no income is being generated so the funds to pay the interest need to be set aside. The interest rate will probably be 7.125%. The interest for one year on a 50% loan will be: $120,000 x 0.07125 = $ 8,550.00 The total amount from grant and loans will be $248,550.00. 2. Farmers Home Administration. Money for projects such as this are available from the U.S. Farmers Home Administration and may be available from the Colorado Division of Local Affairs if and when the Legislature establishes a funding program for this purpose. A "Preapplication for Federal Assistance" was submitted in December, 1987 and is being considered by the District and State office of FmHA. If grant and loan funds are each $124,275 and the loan repayment schedule is for 30 years, at 7.125%, the annual repayment will be $10,140.92. This amount will need to be collected in monthly fees from the initial 40 cust— omers at the rate of $21.13 each per month. 3. Colorado Division of Local Affairs. Application for a grant for faci— lity construction was made through the Weld County Housing Authority. In- stead of a direct grant, for which money might not be available, and, if so, would require additional cost, contracting restrictions, and adminis- tration, the Weld County Housing Authority has proposed a housing grant which would reimburse qualifying residents for a portion of the cost of the Tap Fee, the service line to the house, and any other fees assessed to the home owner. In addition, the Housing Authority grant would help reimburse home owners for home improvement costs such as construction, painting, roofing, etc. to bring some of the houses up to Federal and State Standards. This assistance will not be available to some of the res- idents whose income is higher than the grant regulations allow. C. SERVICE FEES After construction is completed the District will collect monthly fees to repay the loan and provide for the expenses of administration and maintenance of the facilities. A proposed fee schedule for 40 customers is as follows: Loan Repayment ( $10,140.92 + 12 + 40) $ 21.13 Administration 1.00 Operation & Maintenance 1.00 TOTAL $ 23.13 When additional customers are added to the system, the tap fees will be used for installing the new tap from the main sewer line to the lot line and the excess can be put into a fund for retiring the loan or for adding new main lines VIII-2 s80925 to the collection system or for other uses. After 10 additional customers are added, the monthly fee can be as follows: Loan repayment ($10,140.92 + 12 + 50) $ 16.90 Administration 1.00 Operation and Maintenance 1.00 TOTAL $ 18.90 These initial monthly payments are considerably higher than any shown on the list of Sewerage System Rates. This is typical for a new system serving a small community. The monthly fee does reduce quite rapidly as new taps are added. Some modifications to the average rate are usual for the different classes of users. The Board of Directors should set one rate for residential users and a different one for businesses, for churches, for dormitories, and for other users based both on the value to the user and the wastewater contribution from the user. When the users increase to an equivalent of 80 residential customers, the aver- age monthly fee will be: Loan repayment ($10,140.92 + 12 + 80) $ 10.56 Administration .75 .75 Operation and Maintenance TOTAL $ 12.06 This is less than the average monthly cost of $12.50 for the annual pumping of a septic tank ($150 + 12) . From the above examples, it can be seen how im- portant it is financially to have everyone in the community as a customer. A possible alternate to a uniform loan repayment schedule is one that uses reduced payments during the first 10 years and then increases during the next 20 years. For instance a 40 year repayment schedule for the first 10 years would require annual payments of $9,457.34 and $19.70 per customer for 40 users. An "interest only" payment for the first 5 years would reduce the annual pay- ment to $8,859.77 or $18.46 per tap average for 40 taps. These types of loan repayment options will be discussed with FmHA after a Board of Directors is organized following the election to form the Galeton Water and Sanitation District. If no grants are available for the wastewater collection and treatment faci- lities, the $240,000 cost will need to be financed by a loan from the Farmers Home Administration or from the Colorado Division of Local Affairs. If as used above, the interest rate is 7.125%, the annual repayment amounts on a 40 year loan will be $18,264.03. The monthly payment schedule will be as follows: VIII-3 880925 MONTHLY SERVICE FEE PER CUSTOMER Number Loan Administration Maintenance Total of Customers Repayment 40 $ 38.05 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 40.05 50 30.44 1.00 1.00 32.44 60 25.37 1.00 1.00 27.37 70 21.74 0.75 0.75 23.24 80 20.43 0.75 0.75 21.93 VIII-4 380925 SECTION IX DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND VALUATION The proposed water and sanitation district will include all of the land shown on the map following this section. Included in the district will be all of the land within the original Plat of the Town of ZITA, the First Addition to the Town of ZITA, plus the commercial and residential development in Section 31 and 32,T6N,R64W of the 6th P.M. in Weld County,Colorado, and a parcel of land on Main Street south of Block 9, Town of ZITA. The District boundary is more particularly described in Appendix A and shown on the map therewith. The 1987 assessed valuation of the proposed District is in excess of $300,000. An exact value can be obtained from a real estate broker or a title company if it is required. IX-1 30925 SECTION X CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. CONCLUSIONS The community of Galeton needs to upgrade the sewage treatment capabilities of the residents and replace the existing collection system, the septic tanks, and the leach fields with a complete sewage collection system and a treatment system located south of the community. This action will improve the sanitary conditions and provide for residential and commercial growth. If loans and grants as discussed in this report are available, an adequate system can be built to serve all potential sewage system users. The sewerage system can be financed by the existing residents, but it will be more affordable when additional homes are built in Galeton and when additional group residences are built at the Triangle Cross Ranch. The monthly cost to each residence in Galeton will not exceed $23.00 in the early years after the project construction and will reduce to more affordable costs as additional taps are added to the system. B. RECOMMENDATIONS The steering committee which formed as the Galeton Civic Association should proceed with efforts to obtain a loan and grant from Farmers Home Administration and a grant in-aid for housing improvements from the Weld County Housing Author- ity. The steering committee should also proceed with the formation of the Gale- ton Water and Sanitation District by submitting this report and a petition for formation of the District to the Weld County Planning Commission, the Weld County Board of Commissioners, and the District Court. After the District election provides for formation of the Galeton Water and Sanitation District, the new Board of Directors should finalize the loan and grants and proceed with the design and construction of a wastewater collection and treatment system that will serve all residents of the community. The existing collection system should be partially abandoned and replaced with facilities that meet State Health Department criteria. The existing septic tank/leach field systems at existing houses should be abandoned and removed or disabled where necessary. X-1 030925 STATE OF COLORADO Department of Local Affairs of coto ri re DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT + Pat Ratliff, Director •1$6 Richard D. Lamm Governor NOTICE OF FILING OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICE PLAN Pursuant to passage of S.B. 44 amending CRS 32-1-202, the County Clerk and Recorder shall notify the Division of Local Government within five days after the filing of a service plan for the formation of a new special district. Please provide the information indicated and return this form to the Division of Local Government. Galeton Water and Sanitation District July 25, 1988 Name of Proposed District Filing Date Water and Sanitation August 24, 1988 Type of District Proposed Date of Hearing • 2:00 P.M. Weld County Centennial Center Time of Hearing Location of Hearing William W. Warren, President 454-2078 Contact Person Filing Service Plan Phone Weld County County Receiving Service Plan n i July 29, 1988 lerk and Recorder DATE By: �� 880925 Deputy County Clerk 1313 Sherman Street, Room 523. Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-2156 FORM DLG-60 Rev. 8/82 8/3/88 COPY OF NOTICE MAILED FIRST CLASS TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO P. O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 ELMO PETERSON URBAN ENGINEERING, LTD. P.O. BOX 5146 GREELEY, CO 80632 880925 Hello