The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About891553.tiff gt 2/1? aft MAY 1989 S M TWT FS 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 . - 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 ,X 30 31 AOcID'AY 1982 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Monday, May 1 , 1989 Tape #89-18 ROLL CALL: C.W. Kirby, Chairman Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner George Kennedy Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of April 26, 1989 CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Hearings conducted on April 26, 1989: 1) 3.27 Beer License, The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus; and 2) Special Review Permit, Camenisch ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR 1) Communication Services - Brantner REPORTS: 2) Engineering Services - Lacy 3) Health Services - Kennedy 4) Planning Services - Johnson 5) Purchasing & Personnel - Kirby COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Present and Approve 4-Wheel Drive Vehicle - Ambulance Dept. 2) Approve traffic paint - Road & Bridge Dept. BUSINESS: NEW: 1) Consider two Purchase of Services Agreements with Plan de Salud del _ Valle and authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider 1989 Community Food and Nutrition Program Application and authorize Chairman to sign 3) Consider Petition for Tax Abatement from James L. Huff 4) Consider Veterans Service Monthly Report for March, 1989, and authorize Chairman to sign 5) Consider Agreement for Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge and authorize Chairman to sign 6) Consider Resolution re: Temporary closure of WCR 57 between WCR 46 and 48 PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Zoning Violations — Archer -- tl CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: May 1 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 2 - Planning Commission 1 :30 PM May 3 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 4 - Local Emergency Planning Committee 7:00 PM May 4 - Island Grove Park Advisory Board 3:30 PM May 6 - Road & Bridge Advisory Board Road Tour 8:00 AM May 8 - Work Session 10:30 AM May 8 - Mental Health Board 7:30 PM May 9 - Juvenile Community Review Board 12:00 NOON May 10 - EDAP 7:00 AM May 10 - Work Session 1:30 PM May 11 - Area Agency on Aging 9:00 AM May 11 - Budget Work Session 9:00 AM May 11 - Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee 10:00 AM May 12 - Community Corrections Board 12:00 NOON HEARINGS: May 10 - Show Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. (cont. from 3/22/89) 10:00 AM May 10 - Tavern Liquor License, Henry L. Walker, dba Bears Sports Saloon 10:00 AM May 17 - Special Review Permit, Open-pit mine and materials processing facility, C b M Companies (Distel Farm Resources) 10:00 AN May 24 - Preliminary Hearing, Casa Grande/Enchanted Hills Local Improvement District 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 10:00 AM Jun 5 - Show Cause Hearing, Tatum (Cont. from 11/7/88) 9:00 AM COMMUNICATIONS: 1) Nuclear Regulatory Commission re: Fort St. Vrain Technical Evaluation Report (available in Clerk to Board's Office) 2) Natural Energy Resources Company re: Two Forks Dam Study 3) National Water Resources Association - National Water Line 4) State Dept. of Highways re: Federal-Aid Urban System 5) Planning Commission agenda for May 2, 1989 6) City of Greeley - Monfort Lamb Plant Annexation Impact Report 7) State Dept. of Health re: Letter of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage Sludge 8) State Dept. of Local Affairs re: Enterprise Zone Amendment Request 9) Platte Valley School re: Vacation of portion of WCR 380 10) Mined Land Reclamation Division re: List of available sand and gravel operations 11) Public Utilites Commission re: Application No. 39050 12) Board of Adjustment - Minutes of March 23: and Resolution re: Motion to grant appeal - Strickland 13) Duane & Joan Boes re: Anheuser-Busch Company Nutri-Turf site RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Approve designation of The New News as County newspaper * 2) Approve Home and Community Based Services Contract * 3) Approve Site Application - Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, c/o Jose G. Cabrera * 4) Approve Site Application - City of Greeley * 5) Approve Spe- 1al Review Permit - Camenisch * 6) Approve temporary closure of WCR 57 between WCR 46 and 48 * 7) Approve authorization for County Attorney to proceed with legal action - _ Zoning Violations * 8) Approve Letter of Agreement with Dacono * 9) Approve Petition for Tax Abatement from James L. Huff AGREEMENT: * 1) Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge • VETERANS REPORT: * 1) Veterans Service Report for March * Signed at this meeting Monday, May 1, 1989 RESOLUTION RE: DESIGNATE THE NEW NEWS AS LEGAL NEWSPAPER FOR A ONE-YEAR PERIOD FROM MAY 1 , 1989, THROUGH APRIL 30 , 1990 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Purchasing Director of Weld County has, pursuant to law and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, advertised for bids for County advertising and legal notices for a one-year period commencing May 1 , 1989, and ending April 30, 1990 , and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to accept the bid submitted by The New News, said bid being as follows: LEGAL NOTICES: Solid Nonpareil, single column measures: First insertion, per inch $1.08 Each subsequent insertion, per inch $ . 99 PUBLISHING PROCEEDINGS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND COUNTY WELFARE BOARD: Solid nonpareil, single column measure: One insertion, per inch 31 .08 6 PUBLISHING OF SEMI-ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT FURNISHED BY COUNTY TREASURER: To be published within 60 days following June 30 , and December 31 , 1989 Solid nonpareil, single column measure One insertion, per inch $1. 17 ALL ADVERTISING SHALL BE SET IN NONPAREIL TYPE UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that The New News be, and hereby is, designated as the official newspaper for the publication of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners and County Welfare Board, and for the publication of legal notices required by law to be published by the various Weld County officials for a one-year period commencing May 1 , 1989, and ending April 30 , 1990 , all as per the hereinabove schedule. %"t' ,' - C°^' 890375 Page 2 RE: LEGAL NEWSPAPER - TEE NEW NEWS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April, A.D. , 1989 . ATTEST: ‘70 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO EXCUSED DATE SIGNING - AYE Weld County Clerk and RecorderOF and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman P. , 1 s•-) Ja. ue 'ne Jo son, Pro-Tem Deputy Count<Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: e R. Br,. tner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE George en , ounty Attorney f 890375 � 'L.`rz� — BID REQUEST NO. 018-89 (2' ' ,.c FOR: COUNTY NEWSPAPERJALI DEPARTMENTS FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY I, 7989 THROUGH APRIL 30, 1990 The following bids are to be presented to the Board of geld County Commissioners on Wednesday, April 26, 1989, and are to be considered for emergency approval on Wednesday, April 26, t989: BIDDERS , The kew News Ft. Lupton Press Johnstown Breeze Greeley Tribute ' 60 S. Main 415 Denver Avenue P.O. Box 400 P.O. Box 1138 (/ Keenesburg, CO Ft. Lupton, CO Johnstown, CO Greeley, CO +\\ 80643 80621 80534 80632 LEGAL NOTICES: '9MCf--" ER INCH PRICE PER INCH PRICE PER INCH PRICE PER INCH Solid nonpareil, single column measures: First Insertion, single column measure $1.08 $1.17 51.32 53.84 Each subsegient addition $ .99 $1.07 $1.30 $2.688 PUBLISHING PROCEEDINGS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS II COUNTY WELFARE BOARD: Solid nonpareil, single colum measure One insertion $1.08 $1.17 51.32 $3.84 PUBLISHING Of SEMI-ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT FURNISHED BOARD 81 COUNTY TREASURER: To be p.blished within 60 days following June 30 and December 31. Solid nonpareil, single colum measure One insertion $1.17 51.17 51.32 53.84 890375 I RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE HOME AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES CONTRACT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Home and Community Based Services Contract with the State Department of Social Services, and WHEREAS, the term of said Contract is from July 1 , 1989, through June 30 , 1990, with the further terms and conditions being as stated in said Contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Home and • Community Based Services Contract with the State Department of Social Services be , and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April , A.D. , 1989. \"{{{'��y}}},,�,, �J �� - � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST:/ K/kM l �^ ��+�J WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman 1 py; ,��, ��un ,,� ne J nson, Pro-Tem \Deputy County Glerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Brantner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE mil— George Ke ne County Attorney Go ac 1 oeaf; y i -,r . / / 890378 • Form 6-AC-02A ASE MANAAFIFNT gCFNfY Department or Agency Number 381000 Contract Routing Number CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this day of 1989, by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Oepartment of ' Snriel Servirps. 1575 Sherman. Denver. fnlnrado 80203-1714 hereinafter referred to as the State or Social Services, and 2 • hereinafter referred to as the contractor. WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 1001 , G/L Account Number 54446 , Contract Encumbrance Number ; and WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies; and WHEREAS, the State has established a Colorado Medical Assistance Program in order to participate in Title XIX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid), and WHEREAS, the State is the single Colorado agency responsible for the administfation of the Medicaid program, and WHEREAS, the State has received waiver authorization from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (hereinafter HMS) to establish and conduct a program of Home and Community Based Services in accordance with Sections 26-4.5-101 sl. sea., C.R.S., as amended, as an alternative to nursing home placement for eligible persons, and WHEREAS, the said Sections 26-4.5-101 .O.t4 sea.. C.R.S., as amended, provide that the case management agency for such services shall be an agency designated by the board of county commissioners, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has designated the Contractor as the agency to provide case management services, and WHEREAS, the State desires to enter into this Contract with the Contractor herein for the provision of case management services, as set forth in greater detail below, and WHEREAS, the State has designated the Contractor to certify and contract with qualifying individual service providers, and WHEREAS, Contractor has been selected in accordance with the Colorado Procurement Code, and WHEREAS, as of the date of the execution of this Contract, the Contractor meets all statutory requirements for entering into this Contract. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that: 1. Contractor shall perform the following functions: a. Case management services as defined within State Rules 8.486.1 s4 sea. for eligible persons. which services shall include assessment of client need, development and implementation of a case plan, coordination and monitoring of service delivery that assures adequate, quality, and safety of service provisions, the evaluation of service effectiveness and the reassessment of client need. b. Certification, performance monitoring, and reimbursement of individual providers, as defined in Volume 8, of 1) personal care services, 2) homemaking services, 3) respite care services 4, non-medical transportation, 5) home modification, 6) electronic monitoring services. Page 1 of 8 pages 890378 Certification decisions shall be made in strict compliance with State regulations as they currently exist and may later be amended. 2. Contractor agrees to perform its obligations hereunder in conformity with the provisions of Title XIX of the Social Security Act, other relevant federal and state law and all pertinent federal and state regulations promulgated pursuant thereto; including, the Colorado Social Services Code, Sections 26-1-101 g eg , C.R.S., as amended, as all the foregoing aro in effect as of the date of execution of this Contract, and as they may later be amended. 3. The Contractor shall assure that clients have appropriate and timely access to services. The Contractor will facilitate the application process for potentially eligible individuals and respond in a timely manner to all referrals of eligible clients. The Contractor shall provide thorough assessments of Oars needs and resources to assure the most appropriate targeting of all private and public LTC resources to the needs of the clients. Such targeting shall not supplant but shall support self—care, family care and other informal community care. This targeting shall include directing clients to non—publicly funded programs when possible and to other public programs as appropriate. The Contractor will follow the LTC program targeting guidelines as established by the State or as amended thereafter. 4. The Contractor shall process paperwork ( as specified in State Social Services Staff Manual, Volume 8) in a timely and accurate manner to promote timely service to clients and timely payment of provider claims. Contractor shall submit signed Claims and assure adequate documentation to support all Medicaid claims. Such claim forms shall specify the dates of claim coverage, patient identification, type and units of services and billed amounts. • 5. In consideration for the services rendered in accordance with this Contract, the State shall establish billing procedures and compensate Contractor in accordance therewith within thirty (30) days of receipt of correct billings, if all billing and report requirements have been satisfactorily met. The Contractor shall be reimbursed by the State in such amounts as may from time to time be specified by the State pursuant to applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. including the Colorado Medical Assistance Act Section 26-4-101 amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, specifically Rule 8487.30� seals Reimbursement Methods for Casa Management services, of the State Staff Manual, Volume 8. as such statutes and rules currently exist or may hereafter be amended. a) In the event that an error in claims payment is made by the Fiscal Agent, adjustment shall be made pursuant to the procedures established by the Fiscal Agent on behalf of the State, and as stated in State Staff Manual, Volume 8. Rule 8.049 92.. SS9a b) All warrants endorsed by Contractor and presented for payment shall constitute payment in full, except when endorsed under good faith protest pursuant to Section 4-1-207, C.R.S., as amended. cENFRAL PROVISIONS. This shall be or a 1 hrough June 30, 1990 unless et terminated f earlier munderr the m cmmenci nprovisiong July s iforr termination 989 and s setngt forth with the contract. 2. Except as herein specifically provided otherwise, The parties of this Contract intend that the relationship between them contemplated by this Contract is that of employer—independent contractor. No employee, or agent of Contractor shall be or shall be deemed to be an employee, or agent of the State. Contractor will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its employees, agents, and subcontractors, if any, during the performance of this Contract. 3. Compliance with Applicable Laws: a. The Contractor shall at all times during the execution of this Contract strictly adhere t0 all applicable federal and state laws and implementing regulations as they currently exist and may hereafter be amended. The Contractor acknowledges that the following laws and regulations are included: Page 2 of ,5_ pages 890378 • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sections 2000d-1 gj. Sgg. and its iplementi:.g regulation, 45 C.F.R. Part 80 gj. =gg.; and • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Section 794, and its implementing regulation, 45 C.F.R. Part 84: and • the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. 42 U.S.C. Sections 6101 gj. Log, and its iplementing regulation, 45 C.F.R. Part 91; and • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: and • the Age Oiscrimination in Employment Act of 1967; and ' the Equal Pay Act of 1963; and • ' the Education Amendments of 1972, • Waiver of Section 1915(e) and 1902(a)l0 of the Social Security Act; • 26-4.5-101 et seq.• CRS 1982, as amended; • State Social Services Staff Manual, Volume 8, 8.484 et-seq. • 42 CFR 441.300-310, 42 CFR 435.726; • 27-1-114 CRS. 1982, as amended; and all other regulations applicable to these laws prohibiting discrimination because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical handicap, or age. This assurance is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all federal and/or state financial assistance. b. Any person who feels that s/he has been discriminated against has the right to file a complaint either with the Colorado Department of Social Services or wit`. the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights. c. Contractor assures that clients' rights will be protected. Contractor further assures that clients have the right to apply for services, to have their eligibility for services determined, to receive an adequate quantity and quality of the•services for which they are eligible, to appeal denials of service, and to have their communications with the agency dealt with confidentially. The Contractor will notify each client of his/her rights to appeal, and will facilitate appropriate access to advocacy services from the Colorado Long Term Care Ombudsman, Adult Protective, other supportive Services, and the Area Agency on Aging/Title III OAA Advocacy Services. 4. Confidentiality of Records: Contractor shall protect the confidentiality of all applicant/recipient records and other materials that have been or may hereafter be established which relate to this contract and are maintained in accordance with this Contract. Except for purposes directly connected with the administration of this Program/Project, no information about or obtained from any applicant/recipient in possession of Contractor shall be disclosed in a form identifiable with the applicant/recipient without the prior written consent of the applicant/recipient or a minor's parent or guardian. Contractor shall have written policies governing access to. duplication and dissemination of. all such information. Contractor shall advise its employees, agents, and subcontractors, if any, that they are _object to these confidentiality requirements. Contractor shall provide its employees, agents, and subcontractors, if any, with a copy or written explanation of these confidentiality requirements before access to confidential data is permitted. This includes protection of the confidentiality of all applicant/recipient records, papers, documents, capes and any other materials that have been or may hereafter be established which relate to this Contract. 5. Conflict of Interest: a. Definition — Appearance of Conflict of Interest The term applies to the relationship of a contractor with the state when the contractor also maintains a relationship with a third party and the two relationships are in opposition. In ordor to create the appearance of a conflict of interest, it is ngt nesusar`L for the contractor to gain from knowledge of these opposing interests. It is only necessary that the contractor know that the two relationships are in opposition, b. Appearance of Conflict of Interest During the term of the contract neither the contractor nor any of the contractor's employees shall enter any third party relationship that gives the appearance of creating a conflict of interest. Upon learning of an existing appearance of a conflict of interest situation, the contractor shall submit to the State a full disclosure statement setting forth the details that create the appearance of a conflict of interest. Failure to promptly submit a disclosure statement required by this paragraph shall constitute grounis for the State's termination, for cause, of its contract with the contractor. Page 3 of 8 pages 890378 6. Proprietary Information: a. Definition - Proprietary Information Proprietary information for the purposes of this contract is information relating to a party's research, development, trade secrets, business affairs, internal operations and management procedures and those of its Customers, clients or affiliates, but does not include information (1) lawfully obtained from third parties, (2) that which is in the public domain, or (3) that which is developed independently. b. Proprietary Information Neither party shall use or disclose directly or indirectly without prior written authorization any proprietary information concerning the other party obtained as a result of this contract. Any proprietary information removed from the State's site by the Contractor in the course of providing services under this Contract will be accorded -_ at least the same precautions as are employed by the Contractor for similar information in the course Of its own business, 7. Insurance/Fidelity Coverage: During the term of this Contract, and any extension(s) hereof. Contractor shall keep in force: a. an insurance policy or policies, issued by a company authorized to do business in Colorado, in the minimum amounts feed nett below (per 24-10-101, a. sg.. C.R.5.. as amended): 1. general liability insurance with limits of no less than $150,000 for any injury to one person in any single occurrence, and, no less than 3400.000 for an injury to two or more persons in any single occurrence (injury includes both bodily injury and property damage), and 2. if the provider transports state staff/applicants/recipients in a provider-owned/leased/borrowed vehicle, automobile liability insurance with limits of no less than $150,000 for any inj y to one person in any single occurrence, and. no less than $400,000 for an injury to two or more persons in any single occurrence (injury includes both bodily injury and property damage), or b. self insurance, which may be funded by appropriations to establish or maintain reserves for self insurance purposes, or C. a combination of a. and b. above 8. Unemployment/Workmen's Compensation Coverage: During the term of this contract, and any extension(s) hereof, Contractor agrees that it will keep in force employee unemployment insurance and workmen's compensation insurance as required by, and in rccordance with, Colorado Statutes (Workmen's Compensation 8-40-101 et. seq., CRS; and Employment Security Act 8-70-101 et. seq.) as amended. 9. Upon request, The contractor shall provide the State with acceptable evidence that such Coverage is in effect for 7 and 8 above. In the event of cancellation of any such coverage, Contractor shall immediately notify the State of such cancellation. 10, Licenses/approvals/insurance: Contractor certifies that, at the time of entering into this Contract, it has currently in effect all necessary licenses, approvals, insurance. etc. required to properly provide the services and/or supplies covered by this Contract. 11. Payment pursuant to this Contract will be made as earned, in whole or in part, from available state funds encumbered in an amount not to exceed $10.000.000.0Q for the purchase of the within-described services. It is further understood and agreed that the maximum amount of state funds available for Fiscal Year 19.QQ for the purchase of these services statewide is in the amount of 310-000.000.00. The liability of the State, at any time, for such payments shall be limited to the unspent amount remaining of such encumbered funds. 12, federal Funds Contingency: Payment pursuant to this Contract, if in federal funds, whether in whole or in part, is subject to and contingent upon the continuing availability of federal funds for the purposes hereof. In the event that said funds, or any part thereof, become unavailable as determined by the State. the State may immediately terminate this Contract or amend it accordingly. 13, Records maintenance: The contractor shall maintain a complete file of all records, documents, communications, and other materials which pertain to the operation of the program/project or the delivery of services under this Contract. Such files shall be suffi tient to properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of labor, materials, equipment. supplies and services, and other costs of whatever nature for which a contract payment was made. These records shall be maintained according to generally accepted accounting principles and shall be easily separable from other Contractor records. Page 4 of 8 pages 890378 14. Records Retention and Availability: All such records, documents, communications, and other materials shall be the property of the State and shall be maintained by the Contractor, for a period of three (3) years after the date of termination of this Contract, or for such further period as may be necessary to resolve any matters which may be pending, or until an audit has been completed with the following qualification: If an audit by or on behalf of the federal and or state government has begun but is not completed at the end of the three (3) year period, or if audit findings have not been resolved after a three (3) year period, the materials shall be retained until the resolution of the audit findings. 15. The Contractor shall maintain a system of data collection that will assist in the evaluation of the program =_nd the agency's performance. Contractor shall complete reports as requested by the State (Including but not limited to monthly PETI reports) and cooperate with all program monitoring and evaluation efforts by the State. 16. Performance Monitoring: Contractor shall permit the State and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and any other duly authorized agent or governmental agency, to monitor all activities conducted by the Contractor pursuant to the terms of this Contract. As the monitoring agency may in its sole discretion deem necessary or appropriate, such monitoring may consist of internal evaluation procedures, examination of program data, special analyses, on—site checking, surveys and information request formal audit examinations, or any other reasonable procedures. All such monitoring shall be performed in a manner that will not unduly interfere with contract work. 17. Audits and Inspections: The Contractor authorizes the State to perform audits and/or inspections of its records at any reasonable time during the term of this Contract and for a period of three (3) years following the termination of this Contract to assure compliance with its terms and/or to evaluate the Contractor's performance hereunder. 18. Assignment/Delegation/Subcontracting: This Contract is in the nature of personal services. Except as herein specifically provided otherwise, the duties and obligations of the Contractor arising hereunder cannot be assigned, delegated nor subcontracted except with the express prior written consent of the State. Subcontracts permitted by the State shall be subject to the requirements of this Contract, and the Contractor is responsible and liable for all subcontracting arrangements and the delivery of services as set forth in this Contract. 19. Successors: Except as herein specifically provided otherwise, this Contract shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 20. Representatives: For the purpose; of this Contract, the individuals identified below are hereby designated representatives of the respective parties. Either party may from time to time designate in writing a new or substitute representative(s): For the State: For the Contractor: David,West Qirertpr of ernnrams :'(edir.al Services • Name and Title Name and Title 21. Notice: All notice required to be given by the parties hereunder shall be given by certified or registered mail to the individuals at the addresses set forth below. Either party may from time to time designate in writing a substitute persons) or address to whom such notices shall be sent: To the State: To the Contractor: Gretah Ginty. Kathy Van Cnl.praQo,Qeeartment of Serial Services Medical Servirej • ,1175 Shannon. 4th_ Flgor Denver. Colorado 80203-1714 22. Litigation: The Contractor shall promptly notify the State in the event that the Contractor learns of any actual litigation in which it is a party defendant in a case which involves services provided under this Contract. The Contractor, within five (5) calendar days after being served with a summons, complaint, Or other pleading which has been filed in any federal or state court or administrative agency, shall deliver Copies of such documents) to the State's Executive Director. 23. Remedies: The Executive Director of the State or designee may exercise the following remedial actions should s/he find the Contractor substantially failed to satisfy the scope of work found in this Contract. Substantial failure to satisfy the scope of work shall be defined to mean incorrect or improper activities or inaction by Contractor. These remedial actions are as follows: Page 5 of 8 pages 890378 a. Withhold payment to Contractor until the necessary services or corrections in performance are sati sfactorily completed: b. Request the removal from work on the contract of employet/s or agents of Contractor whom the Executive Director or designee justifies as being incompetent. tireless. insubordinate, unsuitable, or otherwise unacceptable, or whose continued employment on the contract s/he deems to be contrary to the public interest or not in the best interest of the State; c. Deny payment for those services or deliverables which have not been performed and which due to circumstances caused by Contractor cannot be performed or if performed would be of no value or of substantial reduced value to the State because they do not meet standards for timeliness. Completeness, or accuracy. as determined by the State as set forth by provisions in State Social Services Manual, Volume S. Genial of the amount of payment shall be reasonably related to the amount of work or deliverable lost to the State: 0. Impose fiscal sanctions pursuant to agency rules for failure to strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws and implementing regulations as they currently exist and may hereafter be amended. e. Terminate the Contract as described in Sections 23 and 24. 23. Termination for Cause: In the event this Contract is terminated for cause, final payment to the Contractor may be withheld at the discretion of the State until completion of final audit. Incorrect payments to the Contractor due to omission, error, fraud, and/or • defalcation shall be recovers from the Contractor by deduction from subsequent payments under this Contract or other contracts between the State and the Contractor, or by the State as a debt duo to the State or otherwise as provided by law. 24. Termination for Convenience: Either party shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving the other party thirty (30) days notice. If notice is so given, this Contract shall terminate on the expiration of the thirty (30) days, and the liability of the parties hereunder for further performance of the terms of this Contract shall thereupon cease, but the parties shall not be released from the duty to perform their obligations up to the date of termination. 25. Severability: To the extent that this Contract may be executed and performance of the Obligations of the parties may be accomplished within the intent of the Contract, the terms of this Contract are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon subsequent breach. 26. Any dispute Concerning the performance of duties, payments, or interpretations of the Contract may be submitted by either party in writing pursuant to the PROVIDER APPEALS AND HEARINGS procedure section of Volume 8. 27. Integration of Understandings: This Contract is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent nOvati0n, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in a written contract executed and approved pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. Page 6 of 8 pages 890378 Form 6'AC-029 SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL I. This contract shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved byrhe Controller of the State of Colorado or such assistant as he may designate.This provision is applicable to any convect involving the payment of money by the Sate. FUND AVAILAZIIflY 2. Financial obligations oldie State payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated.budgeted and otherwise made available. BOND REQUIREMENT 3, If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the consweebn.erection,repair.maintenance,or improvement of any building, road,bridge,viaduct,tunnel,excavation orother public works(orthis Sate.the contractor shalt before entering the performance of any such work included in this contract,duly execute and deliver to and file with thea1fioial whose signature appears below for the State,a good and sufficient bend or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one-half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified corporate surety,conditioned forthedue and faithful performance of the contract.and in addition,shall provide that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor,materials,team hire,sustenaace.proviaions.provendoror other supplies used or consumed by such contractoror his subcontractor in performance of the work ooencted to be done•the surety will pay the sane in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the bond,togedterwith interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum.Unless such bond,when so required,is executed,delivered and filed,no claim in favor of the contractor arising under this contract shall be audited,allowedorpaid,A cettifedoreashier's check ora bank money order payable to the Treasurer of the State of Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond This provision is in compliance with 38-26.106 CRS,as amended. INDEMNIFICATION 4. To the extent authorized by law,the contractor shall indemnify,save and hold harmless the State.its employees and agents,against any and all claims, damages,liability and court awards including costs,expenses,and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor,or its employees, agents,subcontractors,or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5. The contractor agrees tocomply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1937,as amended,and other applicable law respecting discrimination and uefsiremploymeit practices(24-34-402.CRS 1982 Replacement Vol,),and as required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and A.Tame- rive Action,dated April 16,1975.Pursuant thereto,the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or subcontracts. During the performance of this contract,the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,creed,color,national origin,sex.marital status, religion„ancestry,mental or physical handicap,cc age.The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during employment.without regard to the above mentioned characteristics.Such action shall include,but not be limited to the following employment. upgrading,demotion,or transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising:layoffs or terminations;rates of pay or other forms of compensation:and selection for training,including apprenticeship.The contractor agrees topost in conspicuous places,available to employees and applicants for employment.notices to be pro- vided by the contracting officer setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause. (2) The contractor will,in all solicitations oradvenisemenu for employees placed by or on behalf of Ilse contractor,state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,creed,color,national origin,sex,marital status,religion,ancestry,mental or physical handicap,or age. (3) Thecontractorwillsendtoeachlaborunionorrepresentativeofworkerswithwhichhehascollectivebargainingagreementorothercontractorunderstand- ,..g,notice to be provided by the contracting officer,advising the labor union or workers'representative of the contractor's commitment under the Executive Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,dated April 16, 1975,and of the roles,regulations,and relevant Orders of the Governor. (4; The contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975.and by the rules.regulations and Orden of the Governor,or pursuant thereto,and will permit access to his books,records.and accounts by the Contracting aveny and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules,regulations and orders. IS) A laborisrganuation will Xi Oxcludcany individual otherwise qualJed:rom Ml membership rights in such labor organization,or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or discriminate against any of its members in the NO enjoyment of work opportunity,because of race.creed,color. sex. national origin,or ancestry. (61 A labor organization•or the employees or members thereof will not aid.abet,incite,compel or coerce the dung of any act defined in this contract to be dis- criminatory or obstma or prevent any person from complying with the provisions of this contact or any order issued thereunder.or attempt either directly or indirectly, to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory. 395.53-01.1022 Revised 1198 page of pages Da.iP:YMeN 890378 Form 6-AC-02C (7) In the event of the contractor's non-compliance with the non-discrimination clauses ofthis contractor or with arty dutch rules.regulations.or orders.this contract may be cancelled,terminated or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in accordance with procedures,authorized in Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16.1975 and the rules.regulations,or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,and such other sanctions as may be imposed sod remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of Apnl 16. 1975,or by rules,regulations,or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the provisions ofparagraph(1)through(8)in every subcontract and subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations,or orders issued pursuant to Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16,1975.so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct,as a means of enforcing such provisions,including sanctions for non•eomptianer,provided,however,that in the event the contractor becomes involved in,or is threatened with,litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result Much direction by the contracting agency.the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE 66 Provisions of 8-17-101&102,CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract ifpvblic works within the State are undertaken',trea- der and are financed in whole or in part by State funds. b. When construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder,a resident bidder shall be allowed a preference against a non-resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or required by the state or foreign country in which the non-resident bidder is a resident.If it is deter- mined by the officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection.06 may cause denial of federal funds which would otherwise be avail- able or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law,this subsection shall be suspended.but only to the extent necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the inconsistency with federal requirements(section 8.19.101 and 102.CRS). GENERAL 7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the interpretation,execution and enforcement of this contract Any provision of this contract whether or not incorporated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extra-judicial body or person or which is otherwise in conflict with said laws,rules and regulations shall be considered null and void.Nothing contained in any provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint.defense or otherwise.Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of this contract to t;c extent that the contract is capable of execution. 8. At all times during the performance of this Contract.the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws,rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter oe established. 9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 18-8401.et.seq.,(Bribery and Corrupt Infuesees)and 18.8.401,a.seq.-(Abuse of Public Office). CRS 1978 Replacement Vat,and that no violation of such provisions is present. 10. The s.gnatunea aver that to their knowledge. no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest whatsoever in the service or property described herein: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the panics hereto have executed this Contract on the day real above written. Contractor. (Full Ie aj Name) Board of Weld County Commissioners Si ATE OF COLORADO (Weld County Division of Human Resources) ROY ROMER. GOVERNOR By ,J EOY •y EXECUTIVE DInER00. Position(Title) C. W. Kir y, Chairman 84-6000-813 M+u Lennr.Nwster r Fednal ID.nvrlvr DEPARTMENT /J, OF Social Services —/-' Attest (Seal) ` Lia J/ \C,wt'n,,$Rm.,.ry Lni..MN.Titnicaw,C,Yryv Con APPROVALS ATTOILNEV GENERAL CONTROLLER 9y By • r.p $ ,,Ha.s at tau a 8 asp. arawd I•.e. `5.,u.vvfrw an it.,,..not DC•In.;'n5or! 890318 t MEMORAf IDUM C. W. Kirby, Chairman To Board of County Commissioners April 26, 1989 Date COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources /Saw' Subject: Home and Community Based Services Contract for 7/1/39 - 6/30/90 Enclosed for signature are six (6) copies of the Home and Community Based Services contract between Weld County Division of Human Resources and the State Department of Social Services. This contract will allow Human Resources to provide case management services to approximately 100 frail elderly who qualify for the State Medicaid Nursing Home Diversion Waiver Program. Human Resources will be reimbursed by Medicaid, at $6.30 per unit (15 minutes) of case management time. This program is currently being administered by the Department of Social Services and is being transferred to Human Resources under a Transition Contract to begin May 1, 1989. If you have further questions, please telephone Linda Piper at 353-3816, extension 3320. 7 1 y;:'• 1"1V\� fi`N'�, 1 �+W�{�INiYr 'Y )kt H � 4h µ.t 1Lt.+t� e✓e c1 �4 T l:' h� :f f LY kw � �� 4G ,j{e j r,�+��(+,�✓8 �4xG.+i�,t `�Yi k"1,�t ti `� ��° ntfa }A .y,'� w� 'k`��S °'4 _' +,i.4 Hif ,a^ 14 r`.w „s4�! � •. 1 4n • •-c TO: C'erk pmt x RE: keit Based coo gwt5 Contra 5/30O0" `4r ' Enclosed are six (6) denies of this Contract. Please return five (6) of V"`t; them once they have been signed. cy,. If you have any question, please telephone me at 353-3816. 890378 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE ACTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, CONCERNING SITE APPLICATION OF SIERRA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK, C/O JOSE G. CABRERA, AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has received a Site Application concerning the construction of a domestic wastewater treatment works at the Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, c/o Jose G. Cabrera, said Park being located on the following described parcel of land, to-wit: A tract of land located in the SE} of Section 19 , Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Regulations for Site Applications for construction of a domestic watewater treatment works require review of the Site Application by the Board of County Commissioners, and further, that various local and State agencies be given the opportunity to review and comment on said Site Application, and WHEREAS, the Site Application for Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, c/o Jose G. Cabrera, was submitted to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County for review and comments, a copy of said Application being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board finds that said Site Application is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and that it is in the best interest of Weld County to recommend approval of said Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Site Application submitted for Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, c/o Jose G. Cabrera, .' be, and hereby is, recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health as being compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Site Application. �,L,,00 /r ee. !..4/ ul 'U 744. 890377 Page 2 RE: SITE APPLICATION - SIERRA VISTA The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April, A.D. , 1989. ‘79BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: etl WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to theBoard C.W. Kirby, Chairman ( -.RY: \-1c e Jeni _, J t/ tor 4/ e 'no Jo son, Pro-Tem \Deputy County Clerk i Az APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Bra ner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE George K n y 442 County Attorney air G d Lacy 890377 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue ' Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2,000 CPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: Jose G. Cabrera ADDRESS: 5310 S. Nelson, Littleton, CO80127 PHONE: 973-0324 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Cecil R. Crowe, Alpha Engr. Co. , P.O. Box 392, Fort Lupton, CO 80621 PHONE: 573-5186 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) SW 1/4, SE 1/4, section 19 Township 1 North Range 66 West, Weld County. 2. ' Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used Soil absorption. Hydraulic 20.00Q Organic 9 gal/day lbs. BUDS/day Present PE i85 Design PE 240 X Domestic 100 Y Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. (b) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse Subsurface disposal X Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) N/A Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS N/A mg/1 SS N/A mg/1 Fecal Coliform N/A /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine N/A mg/1 Ammonia N/A mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? No. 6. Present zoning of site area? Mobile Home. Use by Special Review. zoning with a 1-mile radius of site?. I-3 and Agricultural 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? Nearest municipal well in Ft. Lupton, 3 miles lflaine ofSupply) (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? (Name of User) (Address of User) • -1- 890377 WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 8. Who has the responsibility for operating the proposed facility? Jose G. Cabrera 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? Jose G. Cabrera (Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the p:oposed facility at this site.) 10. Estimated projecr cost: $50.000 Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility?� Jose G. CabrerA 11. Names and addresses of all water and/or sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. City of Fort Lupton. (Attach a separate sheet of paper it necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain or other natural hazard area? No If so, what precautions are being taken? Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or other Agency? Federal Emergency Mgt. Agency (Agency Name) If so, what is that designation? Zone C 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on your application for site approval. B. Information regarding lift stations: ' N/A 1. The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following additional load: Peak Hydraulic (MCD) P.E. to be served 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3. Describe emergency system in case of station and/or power failure. 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the treatment plant to % of hydraulic and % of organic capacity and agrees to treat this wastewater? Yes No (treatment Agency) 1 Date Signature and Title —2— 890377 • WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) C. If •the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the ,following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Elsaporoval . Comment Si nattre of R vresentative 1. Management Agency 2. Local Government: Cities or Towns (Sr site is inside boundary or within three 3. 4//96/94//96/9 di mils R) d Sapitation Districts. / • Board of Co tyy C issionersn 4. a - mB'Si /" (N'O Co t Citc-. Ilv /G�a%7/t� • Local Health Authority 5. it /County Y`�ning uthoDity • e. 3477 Council of ehernment%keg o a Planning ' 7. State Geologist (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment. plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and Is enclosed. DATE /S- 'y ' egOe/n--- Signature of Applicant TYPED NAME -3- . WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 89®3'7" • • ATTACHMENT TO SITE APPLICATION In accordance with C.R.S. 1981, 25-8-702 (2)(a), (b), and (c), and the "Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works", the Water Quality Control Division must determine that each site location is consistent with the longrange, comprehensive planning for the area in which it is to be located, that the plant on the proposed site will be managed to minimize the potential adverse impacts on water quality, and must encourage the consolidation of wastewater treatment works whenever feasible. In making this determination, the Division requires each applicant for a site approval for a domestic wastewater treatment works to supply an engineering report describing the project and showing the applicant's capabilities to manage and operate the faility over the life of the project to determine the potential adverse impacts on water quality. The report shall be considered the culmination of the planning process and as a minimum shall address the following: Service area definition including existing population and population projections, flow/loading projections, and relationship to other water and wastewater treatment plants in the area. Proposed effluent limitations as developed in coordination with the Planning and Standards Section of the Division.' (Allow minimum four weeks processing time.) Analysis of existing facilities including performance of those facilities. Analysis of treatment alternatives considered. Flood plain and natural hazard analysis. • Detailed description of selected alternatives including legal description of the site, treatment system description, design capacities, and operational staffing needs. Legal arrangements showing control of site for the project life. Institutional arrangements such as contract and/or covenant terms for all users which will be finalized to accomplished acceptable waste treatment. Management capabilities for controlling the wastewater throughout and treatment within the capacity limitations of the proposed treatment works, i.e. , user contracts, operating agreements, pretreatment requirements. Financial system which has been developed to provide for necessary' capital and continued operation, maintenance, and replacement through the life of the project. This would include, for example, anticipated fee structure. Implementation plan and schedule including estimated construction time and estimated start—up date. Depending on the proposed project, some of the above items may not be applicable to address. In such cases, simply indicate on the application form the non applicability of those. • • • • -4- rye • WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) S90`3` , f April 27, 1989 NAME: Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, c/o Jose G. Cabrera ADDRESS: 5310 South Nelson, Littleton, CO 80127 REQUEST: Site Application for approval of construction at a domestic wastewater treatment works. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land located in the SE} of Section 19, TIN, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 6 and east of Highway 85. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that this request be approved for the following reasons: This request is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan Public Facility and Service Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies. The proposed domestic wastewater treatment facility will be an efficient and cost effective treatment and will not be a duplication of services. The treatment system when constructed will have the capacity to serve the mobile home park and is not located in a flood plain. This proposal does not appear to have negative impacts on the general health, safety, and welfare of the present and future resident of Weld County. The Weld County Planning Commission, Weld County Health Department, and the North Front Range Water Quality Association have recommended approval of this proposal. 890377 1 • BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Moved by LeAnn Reed that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: NAME: Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park. c/o Jose G. Cabrera ADDRESS: 5310 South Nelson, Littleton, CO 80127 REQUEST: Site Application for approval of construction at a domestic wastewater treatment works. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land located in the SE} of Section 19, TIN, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 6 and east of Highway 85. Be recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health for the following reasons: This request is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan Public Facility and Service Goals and Policies and the Urban Growth Boundary Area Goals and Policies. The proposed domestic wastewater treatment facility will be an efficient and cost effective treatment and will not be a duplication of services. The treatment system when constructed will have the capacity to serve the mobile home park and is not located in a flood plain. This proposal does not appear to have negative impacts on the general health, safety, and welfare of the present and future resident of Weld County. The Weld County Health Department and the North Front Range Water Quality Association have recommended approval of this proposal. Motion seconded by Jerry Burnett. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Jerry Burnett LeAnn Reid Ernie Ross Bud Haildorson 890377 FIELD CHECK Filing Number: Site Application Date of Inspection: April 3, 1989 Applicant's Name: Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park, d o Jose Cabrera Request: Construction of a domestic wastewater treatment system Legal Description: Part of the SE} of Section 19, TIN, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Location: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 6 and east of Highway 85. Land Use: N Business operation E Farmland ' S Business operation, farmland W Farmland Zoning: N I-3 (Industrial) E A (Agricultural) • 5 1-3 (Industrial) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The proposed area is relatively flat. It is located to the mobile home park's immediate southeast corner. Access to this site is from the south off of Weld County Road 6, a gravel road having a County local classification. \sjP:arsr 890377 -- - , LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: April 11, 1989 NAME: Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park Jose G. Cabrera ADDRESS: 5310 South Nelson, Littleton, CO 80127 REQUEST: Site Application for approval for construction at a domestic wastewater-treatment works. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land located in the SE} of Section 19, TIN, R66W of tha 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 6 and east of I-25. SIZE OF PARCEL: 6.414 Acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Commission's regulations require that the applicant submit the site application to all appropriate local governments, planning agencies, and state agencies for review and comment prior to submission to the Colorado Department of Health's District Engineer. The regulations further state that if the proposed facility is located in the unincorporated area of a county, the county planning agency should be requested to comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the local long-range comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water-quality including .the location to flood plain and capacity to serve the planned development. The Weld County Health Department and the North Front Range Water Quality Association have no objections to this proposal. 890377 4 APPLICATION FOR SITU APPROVAI, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREA'TMEN'T WORKS Foil SIERRA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK IN THE SW1/4 , SE1/4 , SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 1 NOI1TII, RANGE 66 WEST OF THE 6TH P. M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. The proposed domestic wastewater treatment works will serve the Sierra Vista Mobile Home Park. The site is located approximately 2 1/2 miles north of Brighton's treatment plant and approximately 4 miles south of Fort Lupton's treatment plant. The population of the mobile home park is at this time 185 people. The projected hydraulic loading is 20,000 gallonsper day with a 11O1)5 of 30 lbs per day. The present disposal system consists of septic tanks and soil absorption. The systems have been operation for a number of years and replacement. Alternatives considered were installing an aerobic digester with soil absorption and septic tanks with a pipeline to the South Platte River. Both of these alternatives were not economically feasible. The site does not lie in the flood plain and has no other natural hazards. The selected alternative is a series of. 10 individual septic systems that have 6 homes using each system and a separate system for the wash house. These systems could be constructed as needed to replace the existing system. The individual systems will be constructed as shown on the attached plan. The systems will not require any staffing. Management will have the septic tanks pumped ever 3 years. The Mobile Home Park and the wastewater treatment works will be owned by Joe G. Cabrera and Marie U. Cabrera and will be managed by them. The systems will require no special management except maintaining the schedule of septic tank pumping. The lulu' cost or construction and maintaining the scheduled septic tank pumping are the only operational costs. These costs will be paid by the mobile home park. The individual septic systems construction will begin as soon as approval is obtained and will be constructed as needed to meet the mobile home park needs. 890377 i #.......o 'IUJ LIa — .,..a 1vJ..0 U // 111/8U 13:19 $6. 00 1/002 • F 1979 MARY ANN F'EUEJtSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO •......--1 ,r.rT-- WAItItANTY DEED I 1 'Ellis DEED, Made this 15th day Ills July I' 19 88 , between Stoic D umrntory Fee p /� Y Frank Yokooji e% � �G [J.a�A - of the •County Ills Weld and Slate of Colorado,grantor,and Jose C. Cabrera and Marie V. Cabrera II whose legal address is 5310 S. Nelson, Littleton, Co. of the County of mid State of Colorado, grantees: I WI'1'NL3SS,that the grantor. tier and in c"nsideraiuu of the emu of "($22,500.00)" TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HONORED DOLLARS AND NO/1U01'lls I' DOLLARS. , u the receipt lard MIIIICIenq•of which is hereby acknowledged, bas granted,halpim•d.NOW and couse)ed.and by these Presents does hi, pinnt, arga n,stn.Cuuvey and cunliml unlade*:goatees.their hens.nd assigns Shrews.not in tenancy in etnnoam bill injrrinn :la tenancy. I li all the real property, together with ingousentenis, if any, situate, lying and being in the County ul It Weld and State of Colarldo,described as follows. II II Sec attached exhibit "A" , r I II also known by saver and Humber as Vacant Land I Iaras'I OC,F.TIIEE with all and singular the litttditaments ma appwttnlalces then:mit°beliniging.or in ant wise:vet Wining and the t 'eversion and levet sit .remainder and temainders,tents.issues and moths thereof.and all the estate.tight,title.inkiest.claim and , 11 demand whalsoescr of the patriot'. either in law u r eynii), u1: in lard III Ilse UN) bat gained pi will,the betedit:mrens lard mot teatimes, 'to IIAPR A Nil'I l)lit H.1)die said 0valises+true batgaioed mod dew.hied,wiib the avian itii laces,Milo the gIHuces.°feit hcits ) 1 and assigns Reeser. And the gr alnot,tier himself.his laths and tr'si'na l,eplcsenulrises.d,res cuctrmnl,grant,h:,cain and ague to laid ' with the grantees,tlieh hears turd assigns,that at the time of the enscoling and Jethroy rut these mesons,he is well see/ca rl the remises r, use ton't)cd.has gourd•suite.titrItch.absolute and iu lelaasdole est ale al'inheritance,in law.iii fee simple.and has gr"nl light.lull i .I ;thine puma and lawful autln.ritytogo ant.batgaia•sell and untse)'the santeinmaimerandlininofthesaid.and that the flit salute nit(ICC Dude kar limn all limiter and other grams.luau gains,sales,liens.oats,nsscssnrents,cncnnrbrances and itstrictuns of cchnwsei kind or nature I stkser, except the general real estate taxes and assessments for 1988 and subsequent I years; reservations, restrictions, easements and rights of way of record if any. I The grantor sh;dl and will WARRANT ANI) 1{)ItlSVlilt DEl'IiNI) the abosc.bmgaincd premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the gmattes. their heirs nu S assigns, against all and every pawn or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any pall t I thereof. The singular Handler shall inhale the plural,the glut al the singular•and the use of any gender shall be:grplicable to all genders. .t IN 1VITNL;SS WI IIiltEOI'Pitt grantor has executed this deed on the date set fold abuse. ) Flank Yo 00132 ;J�� i i I STAVE OF COLORADO j 1TA(�p, J At, s.‘'.....,•'? ffs. ;.... ., ° CioumY wf Adams tolt;h M'MN"ihrumcdl was acknowledged Imam inc this : 15th clay of July . 1v b), �lokobji so i . t,. t �W O ' /'e•�;ss ri••'VV' wham.%my band mid&tidal seal. 'a or co MyCunnoiAisu spires 10-7-88 . 19 • Patricia err+-Neeton 1800 Lawrence, Denver, Co. 80202 ( ) •1f in Denver.insert"City lath." QQ !� "� No.921A.(ter.3.65,wANeAul v MAP(; 8903 • I ' ' 1111I1e Joint'Omni.) nrrnAJ llaalA,in",}A≥%w,Si,Arr.,'Arrant,yip(11011-.t an)20„rte N in ', 4 I • B 1202 REC 02148326 07/18/88 13:19 $6.00 2/002 F 1980 MARX ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK 6 RECORDER WELD CO, CO EXHIBIT 4/1" A tract of land situated in the SEI/4 of of Section 19, Township 1 North, of Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the South line of the SE1/4 of Section 19, from which the Southeast Corner of said Section 19 bears East 2025. 5 feet; thence North 39'01 ' East along the Westerly line of the McCanne Irrigation Ditch as shown on survey by Jasper Freese L.S. 4392 completed on September 5, 1974, a distance of 51 . 48 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 39'01 ' East along said Westerly line a distance of 544 . 64 feet to a point; thence South 00'00 '00" West a distance of 423 . 16 feet to a point 40 . 00 feet North of the South line of said SE1/4 of Section 19; thence South 90'00 ' 00" West parallel with said South line a distance of 342. 88 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • 890377 I RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE ACTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, CONCERNING SITE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the City of Greeley wishes to build a lift station on the following described parcel of land, to-wit: Part of Section 16 , Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Regulations for Site Applications for lift stations require review of the Site Application by the Board of County Commissioners and, further, that various local and State agencies be given the opportunity to review and comment on said Site Application, and WHEREAS, the City of Greeley has submitted its Site Application to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County for review and comments, a copy of said Application being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board finds that said Site Application is compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and that it is in the best interest of Weld County to recommend approval of said Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Site Application of the City of Greeley be, and hereby is, recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health as being compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Site Application. 7-)/,X / *-f 890376 Page 2 RE: SITE APPLICATION - CITY OF GREELEY The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April , A.D. , 1989 . 1711.)aut. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING -- AYE and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman i gy- L-4L174r-s“ erk _ c ne Jo on, Pro-Tem eputy County JJ ice/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Bran er EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE George Ke nedy CJ County Attorney Gor ` C 890376 a I COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ' Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS (INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANTS, OUTFALL SEWERS, AND LIFT STATIONS) OVER 2,000 GPD CAPACITY. B) INTERCEPTORS (IF REQUIRED BY C.R.S. 25-8-702 (3)) APPLICANT: City of Greeley, Water and Sewer 0enartr nt ADDRESS: 1000 10th Street, Greeley, Colo-'.Ic '1'1631 PHONE: (303) 350-2817 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: Norton, Underwood and Lamb 1020 23th Avenue Greeley 30631 PHONE: (303) 351-0550 A. Summary of information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1. Proposed Location: (Legal Description) 1/4, 1/4, Section Township , Range County. 2. Type and capacity of treatment facility proposed: Processes Used Hydraulic Organic gal/Cay 1Ds. buys/clay Present PE Design PE X Domestic X Industrial 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 5-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants, lift stations, and domestic water supply intakes. (b) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent disposal: Surface discharge to watercourse Subsurface disposal Land Evaporation Other State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) Proposed Effluent Limitations developed in conjunction with Planning and Standards Section, WQCD: BODS mg/1 SS mg/1 Fecal Coliform /100 ml Total Residual Chlorine mg/1 Ammonia mg/1 Other 5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this project? 6. Present zoning of site area? Zoning with a 1-mile radius of site? 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? (Name ot Supply) (Address of Supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion? (Name ot user) (Address of User) • -1- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 890376 i I I i 8. Who has the responsibility for operating the proposed facility? 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? • (Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility at this site.) 10. Estimated project cost: Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility?_ • 11. Names and addresses of all water and/or sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. (Attacn a separate sneet or paper is necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain or other natural hazard area? If so, what precautions are being taken? • Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources or other Agency? (Agency Name) If so, what is that designation? 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Division make an informed decision on your application for site approval. B. Information regarding lift stations: 1. The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following a2 iticr. ' load: Peak Hydraulic (MD) 1.32 P.E. to be served 18,200 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? No If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3. Describe emergency system in case of station and/or power failure. 'ortable venerator; portable nasoline-?owered purS 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: Ireele" "ater Pollution Control ae111ty, S„l: tasc :,tn Street, 'Treeiey 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the treatment plant to 79 2 of hydraulic and 79 2 of organic capacity and City of :reele" agrees to treat this wastewater? Yes XX No ( reatment Agency) �r �y Art's l� � . IMX _t T ' AL� 1 T e;tc)Gl:\ j ilr\ r•ic Date' 1'Signature and 'floe NOTE: Tnis anlication s for a relocation of an existinr lift station. -2- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) g90376 • . . \ , the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. ,.•. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality? If you have any further comments or questions, please call 320-8333, Extension 5272. Recommend Recommend No pate Approval . Disanprov&. Comment , ivnature sf RenresentattAve 1. Manag ment Agency 2. - 5..- ✓ Loca a oveinmerit: Cities or Towns (it site is inside boundary or within three miles) and Sanitation Districts. 3. 41zt/ea9 A„.„,n,.._Q Boar oY ' un Commissioners 4. 3-341 X W if 4Lq„.,,,caJlai cee/ a He t a}hority 5, gheAg �,,e6/5611 t county r1 nnin Aut ozity G. n //` ouncil of Governments/1egianal Xanning 7. State Geologist • (For lift stations, the signature of the State Geologist is not required. Applications for treatment plants require all signatures.) I certify that I am familiar with the requirements of the "Regulations for Site Applications For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works," and have posted the site in accordance with the regulations. An engineering report, as described by the regulations, has been prepared and is enclosed. DATE Ills rcC,4 is len ` t—Av .L.. T-StcP4eikl. • Frank J. Stephens Signature ofl Applicant TYPED NAME -3- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) 890376 r ATTACHMENT TO SITE APPLICATION In accordance with C.R.S. 1981, 25-8-702 (2)(a), (b), and (c), and the "Regulations for Site Applications for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works", the Water Quality Control Division must determine that each site location is consistent with the longrange, comprehensive planning for the area in which it is to be located, that the plant on the proposed site will be managed to minimize the potential adverse impacts on water quality, and must encourage the consolidation of wastewater treatment works whenever feasible. In making this determination, the Division requires each applicant for a site approval for a domestic wastewater treatment works to supply an engineering report describing the project and showing the applicant's capabilities to manage and operate the faility over the life of the project to determine the potential adverse impacts on water quality. The report shall be considered the culmination of the planning process and as a minimum shall address the following: Service area definition including existing population and population projections, flow/loading projections, and relationship to other water and wastewater treatment plants in the area. Proposed effluent limitations as developed in coordination with the Planning and Standards Section of the Division. (Allow minimum four weeks processing time.) Analysis of existing facilities including performance of those facilities. Analysis of treatment alternatives considered. Flood plain and natural hazard analysis. Detailed description of selected alternatives ?re1uding legal description of the site. treatment system description, design capacities, and operational staffing needs. Legal arrangements showing control of site for the project life. Institutional arrangements such as contract and/or covenant terms for all users which will be finalized to accomplished acceptable waste treatment. Management capabilities for controlling the wastewater throughout and treatment within the capacity limitations of the proposed treatment works, i.e. , user contracts, operating agreements, pretreatment requirements. Financial system which has been developed to provide for necessary capital and continued operation, maintenance, and replacement through the life of the project. This would include, for example, anticipated fee structure. Implementation plan and schedule including estimated construction time and estimated start-up date. Depending on the proposed project, some of the above items may not be applicable to address. In such cases, simply indicate on the application form the non applicability of those. • 88cti -4- WQCD-3 (Revised 8-83) • I i I I BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RE°OLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Moved by Ann Garrison that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: Name: City of Greeley Address: 1000 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 Request: Site application for a proposed lift station Legal Description: Part of Section 16, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately .5 miles east of the City of Greeley, east of Cherry Avenue, and south of 24th Street. be recommended favorably to the Colorado Department of Health for the following reasons: The Weld County Planning Commission recommends that this request be approved for the following reasons. Weld County Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Goal #2 encourages County and municipalities to coordinate public infrastructure systems within urban growth boundary areas. Public Facility and Service Policy 46 indicates that facilities and services proposed within a municipal:.ty's urban growth boundary should be designed for compatibility with the future municipal infrastructure planned for the area. The Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Engineering Department have reviewed this request and have no objections. Motion seconded by Jerry Burnett. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison w� Jerry Burnett b l LeAnn Reid w jc Ernie Ross Bud Halldorson The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Colorado Department of Health. 890376 ■ City of Greeley April 18, 1989 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on April 18, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 18th day of April, 1989. '1�oL 1w. O`o m a Bobbie Good Secretary 590376 I . LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET DATE: April 10, 1989 NAME: City of Greeley ADDRESS: 1000 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 • REQUEST: Site application for a proposed lift station. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 16, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County. Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles east of the City of Greeley, east of Cherry Avenue and south of 24th Street. POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division's regulations require that the applicant submit the site application to all appropriate local governments, planning agencies, and state agencies for review and comment prior to submission to the Colorado Department of Health's District Engineer. The regulations further state that if the proposed facility is located in the unincorporated area of a county, the county planning agency should be requested to comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to local long-range comprehensive plans for the area as it affects water quality including the location in the flood plain and capacity to serve the planned development. The county agency should also comment upon the relationship of the treatment works to the comprehensive plan for the area as it affects water quality for the proposed treatment works to be located within the boundaries of a city or town. The Weld County Health Department and Engineering Department have no objections to this proposal. 890376 - 6 WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT 1000 10TH STREET, GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 (303) 350-9812 March 20, 1989 Weld County Cortmissioners 915 10th Street - Room 317 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: Enclosed is an Application for Site Approval of a sewage pumping station. A map showing the location of the proposed station is attached. As stated on the application, the plan is to relocate an existing station; no additional facilities are proposed. The application has been approved by the County Health Department and the North Front Range Water Quality Planning Association. Of special interest to those agencies was the fact that the project also entails the elimination of two other lift stations on 20th and 24th Streets. The scope of sewerage improvements proposed is highlighted in yellow on the enclosed map.Your approval of the relocation of an existing pump station is requested. Please call me at 350-9817 regarding the status of the application, or if 1 need to make a presentation. Your earliest possible response would be appreciated. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, �r c r42C-Lea Frank J. Stephens, P.E. Manager of Wastewater Operations FJS/ld Enclosure 890376 . (�41 N I y`S N !x, 1„U —A-7a.N• woart1' yy,� .::ta*.1�7 , ??Asst',LA, - "X rS "I1 ,,r ,1..' 'pnt. ln9.102"N 11 4 I'M' r17 'art: �! I l r.sr4'"� ' 1' r ir M `.M� \ � "�'►V�1 1 �, M1l u, I'/ '��//l� / 'Ls,b ,A 14Nh � ,.r r � � �}j a1! a1�1 `' AI rv"N " n'r 1 `I y��' 1 „,;(..11r:4} ��4.-.n}�alt w ^ 1 , 'v • Ott#"Y ` �+h} T. Ai 1 "-,rilli JII3. +'T"'+yv stryt - ti3�i., ,. kJ: i.1}I'+ . 1 Orrela 11010 �,t,�}• �� i ..r. 'I'y", '"b t u Ali t3 �+ • I" +;• 're • a i...•nYC toll 11'yl �`l+ lfi Ni �I r} w�`, +I « C �� -11�.`' „:•,,,,e.,t �� t N M1 1 yt�a`J':v� • 4 •2:•.a4. A .,• 1 s fF �d4; 4. E Ty�r,,yp�y 1 ya y+ �. yl°• 1a �A� I' a1 a L'S1• l , ......,,,,..,N.• w l f • Y «� r.{�iIK'ti 17 3%,..--c.-y ;'� «. Ij:Ja4na al ♦ 1' ?� '..:21/21:T.1-* ,11Y WA"; Rye '° ti,'4, rlII��F t' ,44-..,....,3/4-44,,,4 r,�4,w" . �� .a 1,. f� ..Krrt•_ . {C, r . b41‘. i. � _'}, 'a { �[1r4 Y y t� �' � . '. tr tr43m:1�M1M1 yr a� 1 2 y'+^r' ," ' `,.pr.�. \ �/• lfl\ z .'44wsRit ' j T . I L R "il ,e ,A •µ �!' +a ,p � 4 ? Yyr •Y .':+ + I YaAI,V. « '1�y �1a';� KRT.R'.1 « Y,�,� 3+t'11k... +Y ( + `. �kr .hltit a '≤; a: J"N5:G[ib.�r1" `I �, tryilk , ai « � .AYE t' ^+r MI 1�tr,retra 0l` I • Ns. '� 4 tr 11 i , �(r'a. a 1.n' . A '� 00.„tt Y �+ �,Br 5A1V' I3l47P' sa1 (. :_ ny/9' 1..its & _.' �' a. _ 4.rks' ( v.: , 4 7.IN' Ltt tj - fl Av�� rq • y : 4 f�jA '. .:1 [jt Z'uY' t 4, r..4..a {.S , ' a 1l `« t..SKJ�..-•j l � t1 d 3 i9 1' 4 1 4:71i5;,7•y, `i .;"1a7'�}pzT.`,+�t.. a+ • / I v �� nostes. t ll,,�i'.,. hates al A]SiE t ate,_ ` �! t e I it f",N:1 '��`�Jlk a t"...",t:3/4ti-te;,. .tr rw/^ h1Q a ar i4i 'ye. , ;ol,Y i 1 N T, 1 '�� d , ' A 1•,y•Q.RdM•,. . •l ' t ' 4 n--N,, ,,.' R �' •fl •�lI14 0,' A 3 a-viC 'J '4:1t. � ',..!,'S.,-4.44‘=... ,+ l _ *7 , +� • ��1 �' , 1 IkMX law.�'L 1 Q'j S :it • 1 _ +f '3, •%4. Ir711Nd el j?EA ,,,. ,.. , es/ • ..,„,„ _ i. . . .,... : .., ,��,,gyAp�. �{, '1..., �� N ti1b ". .7"11.540:11.11 fi.1�7L Ow NY°'f 'p `7, 4�' ,'� 21 n A.,« yv }Ir T. ,,,,r «.4.,...ri IM Ii • t ?/`i�r{4,;.!..+1:1 ��+ ,TittrI �f ,1.:Tr{{trm i tcit? :d ayh4n)l. n te. gt :":" • ♦� ` J 4Y I�, 11 y'Lu,'• —t-'-'•OC'1t r i a' ' `I" r iiSfrh N+� a 4e 1; T. . r , y lc h 3Y 54 +!1 a1�rl`+" '•1' Ui11 x(11'" 7 . ~, .A .M ' , . ±Y ) AitA _.S.\. *rya J,-•. 1�.�. hY_J 4 .a MAO '� A �'. .+�". � 7\ r4. .•�! end'.r n X11( ti 'f,,, _W_P,IJ_Iiii J;s.awli p.t,. . .�f�15Y�'+�"�i,Q�� 1' t,'1y[�� 1111*, . lib 7a�',y,},�.. j.' 1 'f , p141iY! � '�.� r• wr'r{K ...�1- ,,,� � S� `�1 IIi � #fI'll' ,+ " �' �� 1 u+r ! . S Mt �' �ha de_,. 16,11•'r /u, .I �t 11 ~ 1 r � :.tA+/1.�((yy a{QI,1,(rI�- rustim, tit,av�{.I,.... j 3{'"^ 9f PH' ..}.T I. '�;tr. �` J' T _y. A rk . , - a :: w' 1 •R1N u TM• it..'-,I -1/.�I l •A .! A, . ��.W\ j y4P`ALIiI• [R1' s 8903=76 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN OPEN-CUT MINING OPERATION, MATERIALS PROCESSING, AND AN ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANT - PHILLIP CAMENISCH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 26th day of April, 1989, at the hour of 10: 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Phillip Camenisch, 10504 Weld County Road 7, Longmont, Colorado 80501 , for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special. Review Permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant on the following described real estate, to-wit: SW1 and the Wi of the SE1 of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Larry Brown, of Brown and Associates , and WHEREAS, Section 24 .4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7, 44.1 , 44. 2 and 44. 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24. 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Mineral Resource and the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Coals and Policies. The extraction of a commercial mineral resource is -PLC° ee T f 6"'/ 890372 Page 2 RE: USR - CAMENISCH encouraged when the mining plan promotes reasonable and orderly development of the resource. The Conditions of approval and Development Standards will ensure that the goals and policies of the plan are met. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. The proposed site is not classified as prime farm land. The proposed reclamation plan includes agricultural and recreational uses. c. The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. USR-627, Zigan' s open-cut mining operation is located north of and adjacent to the proposed mining operation. USR-511 and USR-488 , Western Paving' s open-cut mining operations are located adjacent to the proposed site' s west and southwest boundaries. The proposed use will continue to be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. d. The Special Review Permit site is located in the 100-year floodplain. The Special Review Development Standards and Conditions of approval address the overlay district requirements. No other overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Permit Development Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1 . The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the office of the Weld County 890372 Page 3 RE: USR - CAMENISCH Clerk and Recorder within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Prior to recording the plat, the owner/operator shall satisfy the following: a. The owner/applicant shall obtain approval of an off-site road improvements agreement from the Weld County Commissioners. The agreement shall mitigate impacts generated on County roads by the mining operation. b. A fugitive dust plan approved by the Weld County Health Department shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. c. The operator shall furnish evidence he is insured to the extent of not less than $100 ,000.00 against liability for any negligent act or omission by the operator from the operation or maintenance of the sand and gravel pit and the extraction and production of sand and gravel and all activities connected with or incidental thereto. 3 . Prior to recording the plat, the Use by Special Review plat shall be amended to show the following: a. Access for the proposed open-cut mining operation shall be relocated to show ingress and egress between phases #1 and *2. b. Location of the asphalt and concrete batch plant shall be relocated away from the residence in the southwest quarter and relocated on the northwestern portion of Phase I of the use by Special Review site. c. The following note shall be placed on the Special Review plat: "Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to issue permits for mining and reclamation activities. Activities related to mining and reclamation are, therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Mined Land Reclamation Board; however, Weld County has jurisdiction of those matters outlined in the Development Standards. " 890372 Page 4 RE: USR - CAMENISCH d. All rights-of-way or easements located on the Special Review site, specifically those belonging to Panhandle Eastern Pipeline, shall be shown on the Special Review Permit plat. 4 . Prior to excavation occurring on the Special Review site: a. The applicant shall submit evidence that the use will not cause injury to vested or conditional water rights as set forth in Section 44 .4. 11 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. b. The owner/applicant shall provide an adequate water supply for consumption and sewage disposal for the proposed site. c. An NPDES permit shall be obtained or amended from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health. d. An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the permit to control fugitive dust and odors. e. The Special Review site shall be in compliance with the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission' s Regulation No. 6. In particular, the provision relating to nonmetalic processing operation and hot-mi•c asphalt batch plants. 5 . Prior to the excavation occurring on phase #2 and phase #4, the owner/applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services showing that the Army Corp of Engineers ' requirements pertaining to wetlands and the realignment of the Idaho Creek have been satisfied. 890372 _ ■ Page 5 RE: USR - CAMENISCH The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April, A.D. , 1989. 4- - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: r WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman .J (AYE) BY: Nt 1c7I_i1<. e A- c, '11' ,, , c ine nson, Pro-Tem ) Deputy County Clerk (AYE) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Brantner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - NAY � y l George K nne 51, County Attorney F/ (AYE) Gorao i /Lacb�//// 890372 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Phillip Camenisch USR-874 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a open-cut mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant located in the Agricultural Zone District as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated herein. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. , as amended. 3 . The open-cut gravel operation shall comply with Section 44 .4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: Operation Policies. Any violation of these regulations shall be grounds for enforcement of Section 44.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: Cancellation of Permit. 4 . All operations on the proposed site shall be in conformance with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District Regulations including: a. No fill, berms, or stockpiles shall be placed in the one hundred (100) year flood plain of the Idaho Creek which would obstruct passage of flood flows; and b. All fuel tanks, septic tanks, temporary buildings, and any other hazardous items that might wash away during flooding shall be securely anchored and adequately flood proofed to avoid creation of a health hazard. Following completion of mining, all temporary buildings shall be removed. 5. NO permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted on the Special Review Site. 6 . The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 70 dB(A) , as measured according to C.R.S. 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 7. No building shall be constructed within the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line' s rights-of-way. 890372 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - CAMENISCH 8 . "No Trespassing" signs shall be posted on the perimeter fence and maintained to clearly identify the boundaries of the Special Review site. • 9 . Fugitive dust must be confined on this site in accordance with the approved Fugitive Dust plan. 10. Vehicular traffic shall ingress and egress Weld County Road 7 via State Highway 119 . No haul traffic shall be allowed south bound on Weld County Road 7. 11 . All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 12. The septic system for the proposed office is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in accordance with the Weld County Indivic;ual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 13. The Weld County Health Department requires that this facility provide restrooms and/or vaulted toilets. Portable toilets are not acceptable under the Weld County ISDS Regulations. 14 . An ISDS evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing system. 15. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 16 . The Special Review site shall be maintained in compliance with the approved N?DES permit at all times. 17 . All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 18 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24 .5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 19 . The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24. 6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 20 . Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, Longmont Fire Protection District, State Health Department, and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted 890372 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - C,AMENISCH access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations . 21 . The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 22. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 890372 PUBLIC NOTICE The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,. Colorado, on April 26, 1989, conditionally approved a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit cor the property and purpose described below. Conditional approval of this plan creates a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.:L S. , as amended, for a period of three years. APPLICANT: P:,111ip Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado TYPE AND INTENSITY OF APPROVED USE: Open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant SIZE OF PARCEL: 200 acres, more or less Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of approval will result in a forfeiture of the vested property right. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: May 4, 1989, in The New News 890372 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) David B. Reynolds, being duly sworn , says that he is publisher of the New News, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburq in said County .and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continously and uninterruptedly published therein , r4 pvmIc„ftls ' during a period of at least c.,, n;,{w.r - . fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to °� Irikr_ 'Cron � the first publication of the annexed sY.- �a1b�- �I r,,,iesiffift mds notice; that said newspaper is a M i„r�; . ,4.1 newspaper within the meaning of the sat ems•,, mill."'4 tbb act of the General Assembly of the me . A b State of Colorado, entitled "An Acts; r to regulate the printing of legal +I►ird of e► '��7' notices and advertisements, " and u ow miff amendments ther e that the notice a[ _ ile,SIM el_ of which the annexed is a printed ' • ,• ',° . copy taken from said newspaper. was Mnovsc ..r"�ern, or:- published in said newspaper, and in wog • lea the regular and entire issue of '�^rr a,w„�, every number thereof , once a week; . " 1 ,s ro 4._41., in ma, , for successive weeks; � . „r,�� ;�, that said notice was so published t'4,+est %•0. . pN11 in said newspape proper and not in aoAepor aim.:•-' any supplement thereof , and that . , .-cowinr.,',.op the first publication of said '�tRY notice as ,.,aforesaid, was on the a�+'K 4 day of_ May 19 89 � r:.. AND r` and the last on the .4___ day of Subscribed and sworn o before me this, 8 day of MaY , 5,9 89 G,�i��-� - ___ . 'L ice/ No �.ary Public M commission expi e -12-90 890372 ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: APRIL 26, 1989 DOCKET # 89-16L 3.2% BEER LICENSE-THE FURROW CORPORATION, DBA CONVENIENCE PLUS DOCKET S 89-18 USR-OPEN-CUT MINING OPERATION, MATERIALS PROCESSING, AND ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANT - PHILLIP CAMENISCH DOCKET # /� NAME ., ADDRESS /J HEAPING ATTENDING V,7/S✓/JJ7✓ /62.? /(10167//{;::‘,40 I!A L•/T? dZ .1q,.. .tl e leLl ‘73O1 U t.tm 6,4 e i :i'ti iiivulat.^ ( , '_9ti I ;99 .._ ? //Y/-5 e,) fr' /3 ,,::t, 9,.“a..,2-(,) (4O .✓u,6 (,c.' i n,v4/htv..r/ ^/f y/,x'G/: 7 _ //►/c c�- - ?7c/ �)A 1 rte A 7 A4�w t/vi Fria �E [ tmek(Scats. . . /Ck ' r�. Y . v t...�. 13 . Act ;- SV..1C, Cr ,i. SAY.r cd~7a.:,C_L /27— . i,hcz, 1 / ? ;/ _ 40. cal di eed /c7o-riei.aidgclayisti.....,74-_„___! / . i a � /n 7S9 w, r,e /7 th..er7', , / 7).s0/ lM a � lay 1/.i . C £c9 / / Do niceAc,57 syZ I �rrU Rr,.�6 �I ar�x.ayi.,?� --At 1 a1,*///i-r,�. e/cvo o3 ri'c' k nit g-76 3°�eot /g ank c Greclek Au-Weer an stilt Dept Gary o Greet ' vkeAS I n9Q Ln'�" f t C2 rQe Qi `t?, 6 31 70,3 Kt it 4t.UttaA rtQ f)i-Ste 4/14/ Hwy G 6 .1&re rifled f (f coif w.f., . �dgnifd- .2 lit -cisAit-i /.33, 14) b -j - � e 4 // ---t , ,j7 (la- /EA., frr .,. -t ri(() Ali?.O._G 1 5"4 to. a, &P 1.3 ,{e.� c-cn�t cSA4_41,1 ,.. /5 49 V 4.02.1t0 4 3 . - U' r.„..1744.4*-&-----12! Ave r� —Stet A. ko`�t$ rP/ X130 hob kKew I$w_., tyke, U,' - io ivoia4.f.l�Gtmsce,- free, )/t/'/°aceo.o,`eatc Pi Z73—en74 _1r c et mf V r 1C �+ .<<-JN�7ham( T r ( lI (nyvFn;c-ck- Lit f/YTf'a5wt,. 1,44,-.74,7-", lJCtth'/riv=...�. / rf L.� - /''�i-,,:.i o'-/ScG✓ ChLcc.K 4- Cat L .,ARSry o)1oc, C0, 0.2:7 (01--y ,CL/Wfi 8933n A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VIII \10 999 18th STREET - SUITE 500 D� DENVER, C OLORADO 80202-2405 71 "' Ref : SAT-AP Mr. John Copper 4 Vocational Rehabilitation and 1 . -j Counseling Officer is EXHIBIT Veterans Administration -.- Regional Office 44 Union Blvd. Ob H Denver, CO 80225 u'77 RE: Follow-up To Our Telephone Conversation Regarding Concrete-- and Asphalt Batch Plants Dear Mr. Copper: Please find enclosed copies of two excerpts from the EPA document titled Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42 ) pertaining to Asphaltic Concrete Plants and Concrete Batching Operations, as you requested. I have highlighted pertinent information to assist you in reviewing these documents, which describe very well the processes involved in the manufacture of asphalt and ready-mix concrete, as well as the types of air pollutants that these types of facilities can emit. The only pollutant of concern from crete plants is particulates. However, asphalt plants emit not only<r)\ particulates, but varying levels of vo an e orcrmnir compounds \/ and gaseous 9ollut nts, such as sulfur ainvide and nitrogen ;�V( oxides. Tables in the enclosed documents list these pollutants a1121-'give the amounts of each that may be emitted from an average size plant. J Also enclosed is a copy of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) Regulation 6.VIII which limits emissions from hot mix asphalt plAiTtuatair215. This regurarran limn s the opacity (visa a emissions ) and the mass particulate emissions from the plant, and requires stack testing to determine compliance. The concrete plant and any gravel pits are controlled by Regulation 1 , which regulates opacity, particulates, and sulfur dioxide emissions. In addition, both types of sources are required by Regulation 3 to file an Air Contaminant Emissions Notices (APEN) , an application for a Air Emissions Permit, and to obtain an Air Emissions Permit before they can operate. Regulations 1 and 3 are not enclosed due to )titheir volume, however, copies can be obtained from the State Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) . Finally, if this source has the potential to emit more than 250 tons per year of any 890372 pollutant, a Prevention of Deterioration (PSD) permit will be required. The PSD permit process is very time consuming and costly to obtain and subjects the source to a very rigorous review. I hope that this information helps, rather than confuses, you. As I mentioned on the phone, Jim Geier of the State APCD can give you more information in terms of what might be done to ensure that this facility, it built, will have a minimal impact on you and your neighbors. EPA has delegated the permitting and regulation of air pollution sources in Colorado to the APCD. I enjoyed talking with you, and if I can be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me at 293-1757 or at the above address. Sincerely, Ronald L. Rutherford Environmental Scientist enclosures cc: Jim Geier, APCD 2 890372 VII. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT FACILITIES A. Applicability and Designation of Affected Facility 1 . The affected facility to which the provisions of this section apply is each hot mix asphalt facility. For the purpose of this section, a hot mix asphalt facility is comprised of any combination of the following: dryers; systems for screening, handling, storing, and weighing hot aggregate; systems for loading, transferring and storing mineral filler; systems for mixing hot mix asphalt; and the loading, transfer and storage systems associated with emission control systems. B. Definitions As used in this section, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Common Provisions Regulation and in Section I. of this regulation. 1 . "Hot Mix Asphalt facility" means any facility as described in Subsection A. used to manufacture hot mix asphalt by heating and drying aggregate and mixing with asphalt cements. C. Standard for Particulate Matter 1 . On and after the date on which the required performance test as provided in General Provisions subsection F. is completed, no owner or operator subject to the provisions of this section may discharge, or cause the discharge into the atmosphere from any affected facility, any gases which: a. contain particulate matter in excess of 90 mg/dscm (0.04 gr/dscf). b. exhibit 20 percent opacity, or greater. D. Test Methods and Procedures 1 . The reference methods contained in Appendix A of this regulation except as provided for in General Provisions subsection F.2. shall be used to determine compliance with the standards prescribed in subsection C. as follows: a. Method 5 for the concentration of particulate matter and the associated moisture content. b. Method l for sample and velocity traverses; c. Method 2 for velocity and volumetric flow rate; and d. Method 3 for gas analysis. 2. For Method 5, the sampling time for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and the sampling rate shall be at least 0.9 dscm/hr (0.53 dscf/min) except that shorter sampling times when necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved by the Division. 890372 6.97 A XITNOgLY' 072 • - ..-- . . • 100 V -If.i.A?/ 0 lorm denoting comb( quip � Nisul o flmtd [ treatment oombinieg - Win. for the Ik �,+ mldo)•DYrtdlna, •dtot n�jrogn« 'Mnth C.H.NO,• An oily,asaal{,Ig S etlitax heMYl- • snintd mad by the action of strong algal sale 7 , . of ulcerative othiss.' rk tot 2-lthe tee uid flavoring tab, ;�,. nley ulcer Tolit°'l°w for the treatment benaene:it is employed as e flavorin . . ssus Ile.dcect], 1. a dreg ',".:,%; {(ti► r eWuggle• the Paine of artificial oil edW bitter idt,. of T ulcerative lie de. of mirbano• It ins p° - nPeeea the spring n se 1• AnY a rtain specie o hydrooyanio acid in action, ,i '' 2,The prrta ae desks for Drecroatton of a ilented beach by certain species contraction a of ni^trrben'xo1•Nitrrob flM in, '�}, to phrMetb do a, The uscleftho netre.ep'ludeae'See +.,.. _ , '' yUed ion or for muscles for the n,„be,ehle'tO1Otf.1See ails opierie. and sbdomtnel tbrol. G.Ii.(NO.)« hrythrityl tale► ��•exPulethe S.?mitts].The the urine. nt^'bd•�Y' by nitration of the Jrbtl • ''`•"` tabu ll,stria the 1. a or e larva arofia, . lours. nitrite. DreDa 1..%, nit[AS.?mitts]•The a under atfw• erythrol (CeLrahydro:YbuWne): it eaVlu,l� n Nr hale e1Bee carbonate). Potassium on. It is used 'n the `it inn'wsr ■ Nl ,odium pitrogly 0,015-0.00 n•l% o) X�' ao u n.Dose r�. Mier (G• nitroglycerin. ne. CeH.N.O.. S- 24e ,. r1 nitrate o.Sodium nitrate. nl tro,pls•xo um nitrate. miaarbawne,a derivative of belting tae•Mane n.rouge n.9Ma nl4roch hyde se icstatle and va the of b ins,V+Jaa verrou to et' it�Magnesium chloride. nitrir4)•$thyl sewingab a teT yellow, bee lino Ill n� %,;;-,`; �J It is lemon / rn m ldrie fevers. ethyl mtnte. uror.n. etaaatylrtt M n.(epi UU e0lutton of OoeJ;ehuy soluble tn water.Jam:irurn Vie.•/•Mf. ' +^ grin•An ala0ho mild fevers.Dear,2-4°°• nitrite sD ni'tro•gan(niN�' 74.fN)g.A sonmOtnl6r d.ar,N ,. A popular on.as. —gyp} need)'• hero,or w1Q.1 a w* min.), existing free in the atmosphere.h A colorless.,eeM ni p0-80 Va Radon.4•e•f3Ymbofl.legalmomsferment antsined Maiden about,77% by weig life. C,h n1aAt r - , ., In.A OdEr nitrifying, of leguminous plants. lees gee, incapable of sustainingt. A lurk , dls nYtrg a le m uarn'in, 1 R inert, and co 'treble j from the roc ube n h me�a. •ma• ago' i4 is xelativefP rtent e. Ch u,nnt•/ ��i e� _ I ' IA ( but few elements. An imM See ': bs� nl tee•M tdrLt•Z• a animal and vegetable tissues.itu u Table, the :r: Mher ntre'tion. The moons Cid• r reacting Values of Stood Con " nl•erafs.A sett of nit�rlo+of combining o Normal 11 n1•fra don. The D sodium Append. difference betwos n Wn niar he 1 with rOPhe add• for a dye• n.balance'The diet en individual the hi.oast - _,., C.' Trade-markof used ate. used ee intake (as protein) a intake h oast eonµ with _indicator. henYleao-naphthol dteulfon with this dye n excretion. If the nitrogen is in hones „ • frosted nitrogen nPa 1 flees N eat paper. of urine. n excretion, a subject n hon.b '..' an ipdteator.94riD ,the nitrogen nitrogen intake uremia are used for the er&mina") A the ell equilibrium. It the the O en i n kelsms• a wee' ��_ • __ . nl'tro-Niter,9•e; m),A Uq being nntat water: nitrogen excretion, in Rales.r is e urn nri tic Od qve. U the nitrogen excretion Qsa• nl'MO characteristic. . remainder.irritating an balsam is,,.geU 67-71% theccai odor 'trogen intake,the nitrogen lan i resulting West* - e0, • employe• Poetesses • aerna°Y.well highly with water,Occasionally n,dioxide.N.O.j,�.,tSe and is vary oausElo and corrosive.wad wt4h water,t^ ({�'tnmpoarE,op of atno so the ins•sll+ • employed internally,well del also f ' .lag.The time elapsing weld. u hydrochloric;; exralsome andraJ� appearance in the ur— 1 r Lhe acme Du[D°aerna11Y•venereal employed nd of a Dpy�n and the aDP° k n it.. . �l he hepatic e. Particularly arly Venereal amount of nitrogen euuec to ce i to oxide. e ' as p for ... • _ eeoharotio, DarttoularlY S W (ye min.). — peemtds.Ni4mua random aners. 0.2.0. egha- i of °ashen ofnitrogen fuming n e.io Nit Dave. IS.Mustard. which IM V •. nch giVe more o[dish of diehlorodiethYleulRde (7•s•)• hic mMhd _.mod w011 diluted with water. Nitric acid e Ver it a reddish chloroe lyt[00 ins, N(CH,CH, '• � ,. \ hinting n•g which YJu Ehy1)an,lno, C}GN(Glld Ali '` 1 1« ` j nitrogen etiertid it to fume. Ins -salable hydrochloride li i u� N ] color and causer.. sodium he nitrogen Lf the form of wamrtninto le have - . �Hh• AM Ixn r nletel ammonia lien OM°The p into nitro s and intravenously ful in the treatmentadministered, of Hodgkin'sn lo•a - - II nature anretbe influence of card going on in a and lymphoeareoma•and ehronitil properties mifaTO a Mgtges.• . 7' a (mpert 4 • 111 ,oche acids, a preemiehoe of certain bacteria ut interest as chemicaluhaEa^°° NO.;n•••'• I .Itr a . t 'I strl. arun inr the i acne solid• I , other egenelea. nitrifying mtorobrgs^' n. penfoxlde.The e. 1,•r �, I other Inilron:Jinn"]'A d with water W(arm too oxide. resulting-. n• unread..to. A toxic M t e° f Jl,.i s %", -toIerba tS - lam. t orgroin compound'[). A salt ra.group. oxidation of ➢rtros° 1 nl'nAfe . .th monovalent C. preside, n of such .ue n'(nicontaining es14 of nitrous acid• Bee amyl p0 niLeoRo'),w � �� valettNa [Moon). A potassium nitrite, sodium nensdetdn n. The fraction not,yeM„ir .� Ii nitrite, rote nitrite, 'fe the dilatation of the blood,tisanes, ,n urine,and e nitrite. The Preto produce abet depression of by the wawa protein precipitants rc 4 0' i`ereta. s h rah• emote, diminutive. deVretl°r°°are tale.$yob"1,N• I'•1. tot sr,'IA.• ' Jlamut 'i I blood the pulse,and tune roue ail.N• 1'. un) 1 mused d ntidtteY in o the asthma cone. Than ' ,I the motor centers stile in anthmw and angina olCoptun:nR nitrogen.niRh'tp•dnsw ur•i�)�„IC'Ir• ~^' .Nttrev wtoris anti+Lao rl smenorrhee, tetanus, nl"tncelli a eft cer I Mm4rntf: ..a ,� yentoria in nDa"m°dgl convulsions,and in Cason (Nod.• Glonrrin. glyb the action of enfant beerA.. aptleVtte and hysterical high srunJ tot the }ace.ull oily liquid produced by th A action of,n eaP,.•ea •� ' • II it t roarteriosclerosisng. adhex rise t0 OVehinR Of the nitric,acids up0 too ae'iA f too ewlur)'P 11 doses In h siologi°*ltY•has smY f then• feel .. .f•DkI throbbing.and headache.tidoa moron•Like a nitrite. ia mere perninten4 4 e y1.2 l fl tr 0• ,�r J' 'a . nl'oA•tad I^u1 n urine)•aThe urine D resembles.D r�,g[nitres:C°urn^,h in the uhf°a she n pmt G'Ar^[�gl wlur rOriet.t ales l sli ;i 'i - i rtl" ed nitrates or nitrites,or both. Does.0.00-0.12. G)Y as' robotic solution. 0 ere O 1 aided. 1.A nimbi rod form denoting n.to (wcaR°e dvoa[kl •,•,-. ,ra nitre., AI presentee/ the W monovalent roared Nor. 2. A tablets\ • \ \ Al ssv . • • ,es \/ • t': '` 1005 tYMNEL/. sr, .+V/ ttnrpound ri gNA'R nullhydyk .,.t, - d •teohs. The phhat ogle action of a.ointment( near s abase o),Contains 15% univalent 't,1R 0p(harte is similar to that of sulfonethyb of precipitated sulfur to a bas of wool fat, white aI" but it is more slowly absorbed and less was,and white petrolatum. 41mpp °'.,_._' ss0mimatsd•It is used as a hypnotic.Dose, washed s. (sultry Sun,Sublimed sulfur which • ter) See etabest, bas been washed with a dilute solution of sm. rid of al& ' 'P plots,. ul'fe•phsn'YI.w. 1. Phenol- moms to remove teases of add•It Is the preferred r ` .joie e,s s not or ester of phonolsulfonle acid, form for internal administration.Dose,4-12 Om, e'Oj�acid of v' �tri(t:0'ii.2. Phenylnulfate,amiltofphen. (1-3 drachms). (mite r�f,,,,r arid.C•H2OSO.1{, aui'fu•ra"ted.Combined with sulfur. S a..ate.Suifophenate,0.s,, Hut fY.ro"tor. An apparatus for applying sulfur bri fie' ' " ' ' Rte r-1 cyPlc acid. 8Osll.CalsOH.COOH.- fume.'for mammas of disinfection. sew. A a�whu eor nearly white,crystalline powder, sul.fu'rlo meld (otidwn stdfs'it'um),-An aqueous ice' ' - ter•"^ri•sul'fo•sawlc").A salt of ntlfontc add. ea a colorless,odorless liquid of oily consistency; (p.ri , oats E, surf' • � t��is sc'Id(aulafo•vy'nick•vin'iok),C.Ht• it is miscible with water ad alcohol with the Amiter 6. •�t^ sulfuric(acid and ethyl alcohol,ria acid formed by the�tense- l much corrosive, It is w dely employed la the sets and • „ , s t„)S w 32.006.A solid,nonmeta0fe siemens sciences.Also called cC of eftnat. . r a yellow. brittle mass or in transparent diluted a.acid (twitters suifurfomn dilution).An (o-aul•ls.�s P •asa,,4lnic •or rhombic crystals and exists in •a aqueous solution containing 10 Gm.of Hr8O•in • •lobs pr•Iwr of madifioations.It is insoluble in water, each 100 co.:oeeure sea colorless.odorless liquid. .. sisatt'' soluble in alcohol and ether, and soluble It is used like other acids In gastric hyposeidity . •.'UL, ,..t.on disulfide,The solubility varies with the except that it is also astringent. Dose, 0.6-2 ea. • s of' �,p,.e •gan,Sulfur.in contact with living tissue, (10-30 min.) taken through a glass tube. p,$ wee hydmgen sulfide. Due to its local irritant sul'fu•reua. I. Of the nature of sulfur, 2. Com. tmapt « - ' rue, eye ra ucous ucous membrane. hydrogen biped with sulfur: derived from sulfur dioxide, • mpm sets I,mvakes intestinal perlatalsie,and,there- 80„ eetivf - p.. ., fur exerts a laxative influence.The hydra sul'fu•reus ao'Id. H,SO., A solution of 130, in • . agtaq • Jt•. r„ s Bide formed may exert a toxic action on water. It has been used internally as a gastrin , ,l termites, and sulfur has been moms antiseptic, and externally in the treatment of snttgm w•.,•,,,l in the treatment of enterobiasis. The various skin diseases. se o,yertlud uses of sulfur are external. In S rikewlteh reagent,Ste under reagent. .q• aa� ,s w.,fort with the skin, especially in the presence Sulkewitch's test.See under teat. e_ J sots.,there forms either hydrogen sulfide or a sul'lege[OF.soillagel•Sewage. e ivthlueic acid. The compound formed is en Sullivan's test.See under test. tar ty",a.: ewe poison to various pathogenic parasites;and, suNphste.See.„/ate. s• . .r,let.' therefore, sulfur is used in digests Huth as suf.pin"mo•gle bi'nlml.a. See sul/heseplobi- ,, colas,ringworm,and fans.Sulfur is also used nemia. 'y 0 a number of nonparasitle diseases of the din, aulphetrorn.A trademark for 4,4'-bls(t-phenyl-n- s` dlslasK e. •' rr ,eh as acne,psoriasis,and seborrhea.Sulfur alsoo . propylamino).diphenylsullone•tetraecdium sulfon- 6Y ;4, i s• many uses in industry. Precipitated sulfur, ate, a crystalline, water+nluble eomposnd which _ t • .. k, ",v; • shiniest sulfur.and washed sulfur are official. is, being investigated for possible clinical value , ••N ' ,% elWlm a. ointment (unosentu.a su(lurie in the treatment of tuberculosis„ i as y x en•liesm), Contains 20% of sublimed sulfur in sul'plrur. This spelling has beeechanred to sulfur, a sernistunt base made alkaline with potassium which is now official in the if.S. Pbarmaopo oeis Ms 'r • .M. wl.,,..to. and in the publications of the American Chemical • *Seidel s. This form of sulfur may have tome Society. lb.y.etie action analogous,when injected intros sum. Sums, take; eumendua, to be taken:used as Yr,., esuoudy, to that of foreign protein 'ejections. direction in prescriptions, • . _ Daodoa4p( Colloids'sulfur is available on the market under tarmac, 6bmac, su maeh (sh mask, cue msok) (Ar. •• e monk,of trade names. summdgl• A name applied to various species of impound a. ointment (unowntum sulfuric Rime and Torirodrndrent Among the substances Lay' •+ e..p.nium). Contains calcium carbonate, 10 to which the irritant properties of the poison +'__ Om,; sublimed sulfur. 15 Gm.; Juniper tar. 16 sumacs are ascribed-are toxleodendrol, taxies • . ' 4'.' 0m.;soft MAP,30 Gm.;solid petroxolin,30 Om.; dendrin. lobinol. unishioL There Ii also present - Q,�r.. in eels 100 Gm.Also called Wilh nsen's ointment, much tannin and fixed oil, tesin, wax. Also see •r • - Iflwe's it<A ointment, pwasn sumpe.poison a ortac mtnstt• r: Milk of t. Precipitated sulfur. saefll but[At,*shall(susdul).Condste of the dried Ineelrltated s. (sulfur prascipitatums).The form rhizome and roots of Percale, svrrtbul, or of other ' el sulfur obtained by adding hydroohlorie add to closely related species of Rack gowning a "r�I- s•Wuhan Prepared by boilingsublimed sulfur and characteristic masklike odor.It contain%resinous (, Rt,`,:' gms "te n ter.Because it is finely subdivided it matter and a small portion of volatile a e Formerly •R}k�4@•� 't. M uere readily suspended in liquids than are other used in treatment of various hysterical conditions. - ews gsy u , - tams of sulfur, Dote. 1-2 Cm.(16-30 gr.).Also coiled"MM nee. 7s ISNlnred s, (sulfur suhlitnetum). The form of a.extract(extradrrn ss cabin).Dose,0.5-0.6 Om. • arm'obtained by subliming native sulfur. (6-10 gr.).Also called musk root.stead, ,., t.dlexldi SO•. A colorless,noninflammable gee suns.ma'tlen [L, summs.MUM). The accumulation i s'tn a et'rong R atjDR Q�,Qt' with of effects,eepedally of those of muscular,sensory. t - )tr .... forms sulfuroUe 4 at IS ii powerful sng or mental stimuli.—PYmtnetia1Ml,adj. �=y�.-ss�`. • ,y$gy.. - ^a••••., clue to its ret.uoing properties. haled a.of stlmur..An aftereffect produced by several '�J�f^'` . ,," -1n ti gi r^n-iptw� sygt: iE proves fate!. its use eubthreeh:nd stimuli on tissues busing succeeding I reCorrya... 7�• ♦ 'a di,infectant,byirmna Ai III s..:u,,,'tom,has equal stimuli to become effective. elliMerpow , tern Practically abandoned, It is used for the susn'mer e•rup'tlen.Mlliaria. ,10,1P "+ .{.. Prsw rs rvation of dried fruits to prevent darkening surrent s.e.Hydros vaednilorme, during the drying.It is also used for its bleaching Summenah-Barker method.See under salad, • r " ompertlee in many industrial processes.._- • • Sumner, I. W. JRaglish surgeon, contemporary). Ft . R • r////////..�/ �//� o■/�■/{�.�� jj EXN161 . . l • f r `.I • /'y I TABLE 8.1_S '`EMISSIOIT"FACTORS FOR'SELECTED GASEOUS PO S: FROM A CONVENITONAL ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANT STACK' r s.�, Emission Material emitted Factor Emission factorc ,Le S Rating 8/M8 , lb/ton D1r C` J%h eritis,1 d ` ^e C 146S 0.292S /017 Sul£ut.oxides (as SOz}� v Nitrogen oxides (as NO2)f D 18 0 10 f 0 xi(- Volatile organic compounds D 14 0.028 D Carbon monoxidef ,.,J D 19 0.038 Polycyclie organic materialf D 0.013 0.000026 Aldehydesf D 10 0.02 Formaldehyde D 0.075 0.00015 2-Methylpropaaal 0.65 0.0013 (isobutyraldehyde) D 1-Butanal 0.0024 (a-butyraldehyde) D 1.2 -Methvlbutana; 0.016 (isovaleraldebyde) D 8.0 aReference 16. bParticulates, carbon monoxide, polycyclics, trace metals and hydrogen sulfide were observed in the mixer emissions at con- centrations that were small relative to stack concentrations. SExpressed as g/Mg and lb/ton of asphaltic concrete produced. 1 e Mean source test results of a 4 Clint". eReference 21 . S = % sulfur in ue OZ may Se attenuated c50p by adsorption on alkaline aggre a . 'Based on limited test data from the ingle asphaltic concrete plant described In Table S. 1-6.1.1 EXHIBIT 1/ 10/86 `t neral Products Industry 5. 1-15 AI 890372 It _ Y• : e J •'':i '�Si T nes p1�t0' Y O D- ,....-i.•..-- ff" ' ' -, Can K A. : c,;-&%.15:1' r L at wt`s} ,it 1 ' o1 ez r • • -.:- j :s were mauled in 71", -114..1 ' R eg7y •... . 4 „ f G. '•' h Yi+ . i : ire Qrrt�3te'da 3T3. rFq'� '.:.� 7 T n , ''a f crew . Y". p .} /L.:cited 7- a • tit r }f `to � -.4- i y a .. ; ,�;o i; ,;Ater thb ,r• .y+ '•� + -t ?4 t. . rr.- ,. 1zs ._r.: ♦t 1Tf TRACY'a first S F € 4' k-, of Pboerdrt r 'e s t roe s°, s ° nnifer r regory. Ye, try 10 • elr klla elf•• Oe T q• tl r' 1 ,' R ' ro ---" et; �Centenni.IPark.Tric) wl •eat tyro, v, tinued I -u ,stnhthatbbsl• t .T� .._, Al '.fair weal - d Thur 'with highs ne.r 60 will gals wo14IQ • pilots Steaart's minder t apienly of opportuniti s relaunch their kites. 't-t;t ,, >idence iri 1982. sneer ' r� '.. . partially burned t a+ ! e s :i :n March 12. i .. %. r,y:e shaft wee of 1 - _. .! - > %rNrtiln to COtrrt lit .. . breath eat, fir �pnlS tied t : �y ,., -T!YITØ.. t ..', T 1"i. .' p i• Ee a decade long gmppSgn[Qt'. r�, ozone. winch eea ucuits menr r u . ,1 +.r. . c air' tk $-term redOctlonC - braves and ,.‘,-,jr;.; arid sus s ,Id authorities his I ,ma*` is examiae4,the t 4 ▪ .•,t•• pended particuldres a .'breathing O. ::.• ,la r h?er,Christine I iter4C40 t many urbad'areas: problems. •F. t. I:, that Michael Tracy tidied t— •-'SiuV `•i fctieral ati yusll ' y - , IA;th a metal baseball bat. r`le 'x° J The EPA re il 1 :Atone pollution _ • 11d, t _ ht , <s.tb " •} The cscoverediutant nand to l.'. "clearly oble 87 air• with 8o C' , I ain tritilCourt on Tuesday, v s> �..' 198T(� a qulanLv,aDd �roblem in 1987 for the U j with 89 '° ,: Ranks'1 f chi3d r _» S t aeotter Ilion ,e 11 the „one u ,s•ay ing and were tttet► T 1;a" rr, . ' e,a source a f►hf ..-f te+ tent ° ' t . the mod. I k,„ t ° s # Year coon ($1t.DREN told polity! c ,� ��S E of the . e seriously efi be } try where onvte ley its deredurd•:• t t adl,tent roaogsAttd t ➢� i- r •. k' .si•: � � • . . . „ . .wtucJt CO 1 thy and "early htdica that about w t� Ll.h, tKLeved t9.Lavl t . s c ti oNa, a n1 nt 6ddtttonal areas map Join the list, e;. .:, tint rn's death.t.44,. 7rti t - . '7-cr. t c ».y1r 4�a '}14' ' a . neryrcUS# ,...-'3" e,• ` said the EP4 } t• lice tfiat heY_bDotJ! "e strt� �z G F , � t . fi f, Rhpi erg i s,6 J-bi Illi .e tit t+d91.11 ,'8 • f ' d . - 742 ,. t 4A 3 2` <Ham, ::along vaith Jas ph climbed Selma tart 1 at the home, F °' : 1 SIsH V . s- according to spot e report, ` t they arras w cupter to meet . rte,•. � ":* - " ` . in tt ie driveway only seven ear c F' , lay $6 and IAtsr f 5- r4et i't „, , y . • a .1e-story t x • screaming •my state li a es r rry Troupe Aot t .. County the ground) y see the ho n,J t paant, he oqlr a -0 t. � � - :1:14_;,,,,:c_ } •. TIN SAID THE 1Syears. toward tFa F,', ₹ t; wee>a' tiv•.�.n Martin broke . �3t bared scanning the area` • They et evil ::: i flagged dowrtan °: -f ç4 .to t,. ed shut , :t�x'S, v▪ " " drive forward, ma)dng ambulance o k c t1:,i,!VW,: 66 neat US -',�,+.,. Highway m-,;.1..,, e 431 chid was tfsill- _ �, �� -1 Jt.a - were not around the s ' tt ., ,. , . *' ported to the nt. .; re she d ed of bead ,a- : ' rjt: othe!s , at e,3, I ed around and J rt� • t r �. 3 • "'r >f4YF '. - 3xi �,M.,sr �.Ilia ills. •. S injuries \ -s.�' t► flatbed 4v beLt�f'fQutvld 3w40 one toget insidescreen the +' ': old unclerating th ',. 1 E qdy a L fP4114Y BIT r fA ti or end Don Martin.w 1014 open the screen door Wh to sal i ear y° '� 4er 15- uncle. Jennifer whole •_-rating the (�c -' toa� i" discovered Jennifer had „t, g �•• pot - •• _ Tan i e in Boulder' died of ' by•�1�to be cl r . 1• _ Z< � � �-�n � �t�fe 1S - !d ran inside and told � yl , Jy jajune tt .•••.t United Hospital `t' f1p rpr help. Don bfartfn F'ortw.it i-1-. . . �l .. ck- >�r J ^ idAHT - In an interview Tlin. inured girl. "Beve ing togttltr t L ci.ering. Her 1O. 1 'rt'- t° the her older brother : tde • Rh the 1 g tY ttP . - onto his ann and conrtnt r�lt r he r •,owger son. " '� t eii eta $atuniay night with the < k'• $alma Martin said, because . gas who has . t t i: 1,:hi o.h.+ s side since • Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 April 17. 1989 Addendum Board of Weld County Commissions: We are pleased to submit to you our plan for a Site Specific Development and a Special Review permit for an open-cut mining operation, material processing and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. Case Number USR-874 . I hope to express to you and give you a better feeling for the project, We have lived in this area as a family for 33 years and my husband has lived here much longer and attended school in the Mead area. We don't plan to leave the area, it is our intention to mine around present housing and continue to run our dairy. We have also purchased additional land to the south of us with a home for future use if it is more feasible to tear down or move one of the homes in the gravel pit area. We know that a request for 15 to 20 years in an area like ours is a long time. However, is it really when you take into fact that mining is already going on in this area and how long it has been in the process? We know that this area according to Weld County is designated as a mining area and must be mined before anything else can happen. We have tried to sell a few fiv- acre parcels at times only to be told when we get to the Planning Services that we must mine the area first. The size of the area to be mined at one time will be 15 acres. The pond shoreline will be created with mine progress sloped as required by County and State • regulations. Most of the operation will be claimed as surface water. We have changed the Access road and location of the batch plant to the North in between Phase I & II for the welfare, health and safety of our neighbors. It was also requested by Drew Scholtinga, Weld County Engineer. EXHIBIT 1.3:-S11:14 89©3'72 J The Asphalt & Cement batch plant must have permits from both County and State Health Departments before it can be built, and is inspected by them during operations, so this shouldn't be a problem on the welfare of our neighbors. Although my knowledge on - Batch Plants may be limited, I have noticed that they are located in Greeley on the Northwest corner where there are new large housing developments being built around them, We also have several Batch Plants in our area, which at this time don't seem to be hurting livestock or people and are built in areas where both exist. We have been reviewing the impact on road traffic since the Planning Commission Meeting. Our plan at the present is for a maximum of fifty round trips a day which is an impact of . 00625%. According to records kept by the Colorado Highway Department there is an average of 16,000 cars a day on Highway 119, this is how we derived our impact. We also have to obtain a Road Maintenance from Weld County, which is approved by your board, and the state has no problem with our trucks as long as we stay within the load limits. We have sent a plan to the Longmont Commission and they found no fault with it other than the possibility of fugitive dust, which would be handled with water trucks going through the area once or twice a day spraying over burden piles and road areas. Also, we are required to obtain air and NYPD permits from the Colorado Health Department. - Terry McKee of the Department of U.S. Army Corp.of Engineers is currently working with us on any - changes we need to make to rechannel Idaho Creek or determining if we are in the wet lands. We have enlisted the help of Steve Dougherty who is recognized as an expert Environmental Consultant, but presently - have him on hold until we obtain our permit from Weld County. We will not disturb the Rural Ditch and have sent them notices of our plans and they have no problems with anything we plan to do at this time.We would like to get our open-cut mining operation underway as soon as possible so we would be more compatible with others in the area, mining along with them and having close finish dates. - 890372 - We have been approved by the State Mined Land Reclamation Department in March and hope to be approved by the Commission, so we can proceed with obtaining other permits required by Government Agencies. Brian Bingle, our Weld County Planner, I feel has done an excellent and efficient job of informing everyone in our area of our plans. He also notified all County, State and Federal Agencies involved. We feel that he has been a lot of help and a pleasure to work with. Thanks for your attention /I46.416)11J-WALCa.- 330272 , 1 \ ( / ' S\j / . --- iyfyi e f !\ �.,i ` t . u _J o'er y p • f 1 , . .......______ • rists , r / _ 3"11rj11AjtON REbERYOIR)= 2 1' 3 � �-�� 1 I - Xi I� 4 /�af1 - � S:a r !/ / _c_r_%______y 0\i \ r\ �� Da7R.s482 7 se � �, l '�\C.\ � .C.tag ti ,.BSB • '1194 — a a96b � CMANCEr -- �- �� ( ' /I 48k ti e/ ny �.— s0 - 5 47 . B - � -% i - c _ te. 1, rgl� � _ .- \ o/ 5' `I - rte—_ ✓/ r • ¶ryqJ.T.L. ., r s68 Cr_ \13 a, .a = r 1 0 �' aY i r•., \ 1 9 e..�_ _._ 7 4 _mss'-. - �� '. • 4B'N'e11�. •C��rv2 Homes — ->`.3 - _ r r- 444 It _/ a�s fla , O z,' V ''er -- - • yrr T2iIPj 1 - _ ca , R.e • f WR r ' t •, . � /� - e , -•�, 900_.•i Cs 4OZ1 �� .Y -fin e A.( , '�•� s -. �� w / ) - . it —�� , �ti ` � � t \4 l ` 1r . �_ 49 _. 6837 a•�`M>` • 1_ _ -. _..t / \ 1� \ • • 'r/eel: b - n :Hi ( � — _ " ----— ••, — ,\ ___A, .4378 - — -.. Y � �i t� M• I �I �491< � .�t e4� 4*� --I •I. �h e.el .•vt �• Oi - ipti.l00 \' . ATT t, 4. .�TL --''::: --_ • lj::: _ avo • _ ,f/ ic M / _. F ___.— — - "a- _ _� 1gr ,, aeea 4320 _T_- ! 1 - \ 473 , _ _-. i �/ j (� Flire>r., „f..tr,� 9�n11 ,--E-- , \ 89{�3'yz }} f ,� 1 '� a 1 ! / Imo, , ,' / k� _�� ,e. t ,r, l \ 1 / . / :��.a�..e.ti..A, , V , SILVERS, WILLIAM L.a SHIRLEY J. LARSON, - ' 10608 WELD CQ RD. 7 i DOROTHY E. I MrvNta:n EMlire I))% ,re„6 I - Mo Nialh Empire Oi*�n'fns WDCZ 0 LONGMONT, CO. 8050! t 10706 WELD Cal Pe aex 331Ze+ 1 I f�O.L;0X 310 // TRAIIE • R0. 7 7hthh{enlCo�s. �0�33o,pe if O PERMIT BOUNDARY I LONGMONT, CO. I -_ WDcr i Tit."ti+e+, , Coro.gii?33.0,20 KOLDLWAY, ; I r I 8050i IRRIGATION O1TCH ARTHUR, i — — - - _.. ---l--- ------�Jv��ta.a imboto ��0 - -rr =_.. . ..��s- ----- ��+a��►a�.�--- - r TRUSTEE - - - -- �- n /G228� r\ I POWER LINE j / 11 jilt-V3598C M CO. \ \ _ LONGA RD. J3 ¢ LOVELAND, CQ I D I j / 80537 , - \ ch j WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPT. I , ! ¢ A-O.sox 758 / I % ¢ GFEELEY, CO. 60632 i I 0��(c'� DALRY F M' n /- i i l ' / OPT / .0 i I, 1 60 1 I i, I My ¢ l• __________) if ,, _ \ ; t / , ,. I l E I l; rI. I�� 11/41 0 I ST. YR4CtN LTD i! c/o RICHARD ),1 f • ¢ G0VFNICO ii!,!! 1 -'� it #62007,! 67Ih Ii 'i - /f 'F.:'ti DA, CO. I I ft ,, P 1 I ¢ J ?0004 aJ/ `` ¢ Iii! o� l C(1/ f, „ iI o GAS ('�NT �t •.'1 FACILITY �/ el• ITS i . I A ___ cid / . --...-,2.„:„,.,\:A R y n-A ,I i r R. essi I 0,. ..z . frit, , ; . ei i ---__________,.._ ) 9 _ _ e _ _ p— r---------- :L ',CPC CD0 a .'J 17 1 6 �S 5 0 I - i , 8903'72 i C 9777 WELD ri co FD 7 I 1 ;'I nCOOPER, JOHN T. I KOBOBEL, WILLIAM, EDWARD, 8 MARGARET I ( lr+en;5c la, Phi f�i 1(YJJ � , 1 i p PERMIT BOU R • ❑ I A I . IRRIGATION Ol7C}/ 47......... r,�. .. .`?Zr6 O\t. `lt -. �, . _ �.� y� ��o��i ��. aa7 l'idr -- ' 3 AOWEA LINE . _ _ -. - . _ . .- . __. _ . - ..�� • .-1f(9 � , I I, I / / I ' O I / DI ❑ 71 1Oft ROWER LINE z� , CO / EAST OF ROAD I? ( rsIDAHO CREEK / I. DAIRY FARM - / � PHASE II / / �'. i 1Q0 YEAR / FLOOD BOUNDARY / PHASE III / / / \1/4/1 ° i i / PHASE Y lea Ads II, , 11 r fi {! �k fC R 9 ,. �.*§ t }' o SETBACK ti F 1 / 1 1 PLAI'N' ARE/ ) t ; ROADS \ 1 i E / t 1 I / /� ' I ; / 1 CAS F.'CILITY 3—a ( I t �. 50' SETBACK / ! ' \- i s I G`t`C A PH SEIY _ _ - PHASE I ----An/ \\ is CC i N � � i w Opt ` IA / `./ a s a i s 1 a PHASE Y /P>=- _iwi I� ��en OFF, \ 1 1 L :� - _� - / I ' / e" f- - - u OPEN AREA TEAL +/11/ tts V\ 1 ?OS>t<jdoV �x / /' POND AREA DIkECTIUN OF / .ri IBA T / / ARE �0V WINING \ I i el.� \ ________,---/ / / I Q iv A� !I ri -- •�a-ti';.ti `�L-,'aZ�sv�aL`s.Awe€eir�i�t6-i.t'�vE'�%ti.4.666�.`a`►\6ELIct.N\\R1.o r.a".v►e;t 'r�`a."`t.�`'..�.�N.'C�"'bN.`.�t1\S.,\`� IT 56 15 v 1 I` % 890372 EXISTING 1 l U PERMIT BOUNDARY 'MALE / .. .. , , _ ..,. O !RZtAis ON D17�F�a _ tt�soN.aw.. . _. . . ._ . . _ �.'_►� �wooa.a�aa+�v.�,aNw�r�. a�,aa��►*�ra waaaaa�.avwa�.a�►waaasa+� "...••,.0,06.‘,* .. .I `� IDAHO CREEK - - / POWER !1NEfie. i f EAST OF ROAD j I I f 2:1 SLOPE BELOW ✓< Id UNDER WATER / , l.il LEVEL (TYP) f r ifs / , P r; \ 1 r � fa I SI S [� f 1i — ` f (0 l t I 0 r) 3I1 SLOPE FROM OP1GINAL w' / f! f I GROUND SURFACE TO LO' 0 K1 BELOW WATER LINE.(TYP.) �G� Ji V v I • 01 I /ik".1 . 1 ! t 2 et , SOT .wi\\ 043 / ki Matz fl1 �' _ GAS �� i <<C� � ✓ iii � -- _� FACILITY G86O 4847 �� 4 SZ / ,.11 I lie 3w } i ' , ,•C I, 1--___________________ 1 6 1 i 5 1J / 890372 EXISTING I i1 t s • • 4 EXHIBIT& NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Creeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office can be contacted for a list of certified court reporters in the area. If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 89-18 Phillip Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: April 26, 1989 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit — Open—cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} and the lo* of the SE} of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7, and south of State Highway 119 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECOR➢ER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff. Deputy DATED: April 5, 1989 PUBLISHED: April 12, 1989, in the Platteville Herald 890372 4XN'Dir 6 e u Affidavit of Pubtication STATE OF COLORADO County of Weld ss. NOTICE 'Animme aillialtei I A.Winkler Riese!of said County of Weld being duly sworn,say �Its NS Carly Zan- that 1 am publisher of tna0dIswr,•wait Serra cur a PLATTEVILLE HERALD her•ISOnNw.el the kret Omer tk.nwrrt,et wert>rnp. that. the same is a weekly newspaper of general emulation ulation was won' Neel Canty Ceinimet printed and published in the town of eau•snot ie fewer Was 'Cel an NO ierA f .er the lien PLATTEVILLE wailer.meperwesay wmamn kV IMMINO AA elemiektisittleOmer in said county and state that the notice of advertisement.of which went rise were rrdrAawara lMsa the annexed is a true copy has been published in said weekly w newts to rasa ad ese..se newspaper for ,soma ;�ao-x.+n v-'••�:�_ . maws or cur intr aub /( '{'�•�� wee consecutive weeks: pity dies tM menus et s newt that the notice was published In the regular and entire issue of every "purr 10 miser s ne ve el eta pee number of said newspaper during the period mount w and time of publication *ea di Man-et the tams e of said notice and in the newspaper proper and not in s supplement e thereof that the first publication of said notice was contained In the petit assa MI to Net pass rmrM. slstaleo mil: tasueofsaid Twapaper faring the date of eawtwtsaratrtsau arts./'stswr / rC .n atsr earwrtvdis an r ter... (.l�a .2. A.D..19l9 and the last publication Mr(s'Orrt"w;"Yry eldeetM't theine ens of.In the Wue of sad new.paPa•bearing date. �� n~� V . rtu fl sMathuaa• '-saverrwrla.rlems w ern ear the —7G day of natesapen• t I Qek that the said a-as ti gal well*WAIN Omit PlivallisCanialolleaglaglalladasi PLATTEVILLE HERALD wu'eraoa errinet ms,are - Coat Casssrdrw,a Mai.IN as has been published continuously a I and uninterruptedly during the O ems ptrndt,Oaar,.ms W rtenet period eat least fltb"two consecutive weeks next prior to the first IOW .Yxsa rust,tlesas5.CSF issue thereof containing said notice or adveasement above referred rot.. .- , to: and that said newspaper was at the time of each of the OCCi0lTrrtlPle ~AIM publications of said notice duty goaded for that purpose within the •..FldlsCawWa meaning of an act entitled. "An Act Concerning Legal Notices. 1016$WSCswraae7 Advertisements and Publications and the Fees of Prtnta's and twipamt,Ctli MI*301" Publishes thereof. d to Repeal all Acts and o to In Dar:YAM x915 Conflict with the en:tsnct' 1 ,192 Tea:loCOA t: all aneq�i cots f. paRlcul by as WM=Vie needle Dateeanmrt appme¢. 9�3,a/�yd//m aK Plot*MCA gniSpotlit M41w II tv/f/_//'. tente.Taira // ✓, w+rwa• one sin meta and ctn. '� Publisher aet set .CeSiettPT ow:Wes.ma Ma MA •;sa era% et sonnet 10.' 3u bed sworn to b ore me thM�day of wonkyliPs4 tli.i t hi war M son I ,. MMy!�≥wMyyl�IlaClrrsO►.. LOCAYION:ss li,eeWf 3 enwe""n•- emiatrtlr samat/Ywaraerot# asst.rrwtaa.wc.aM.ae l (/ Notary Public rota 7 d_sat rant.tq`. Q 1 5 DE ER AVENUE 114 COISIIIMINOS COUNTY.COLORN30 FT. LUPTON, CO 80621 Ph NARY Mw rnlaae ,COUNTTCUle lillaajaTCYIi[m eOan My comnirlon expires Jury 1972 'plrirAISOM s' w,• ^ Y ,a,;;eb1arldaerall wa s u 890372 ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Colorado eww:nr ro tilt ranef1Mn w/M stele a can County of Boulder rade and Me weld County Zoning Oronence.B puelk,Marine will M Mid In the CMIMge.M the Sommer Caw*Camml.MM.«weld Own". COW'S-weld County Contemn&I Canter, 975 tent Sweet.Pint Floor..Grwry..Catre..alt the floe SCRIM.All perepm III My VW , 1, Dean G. Lehmand0 Mr- lined in me site adecRlc Oat rpnont Plan end 5OKiel Review Permitter're0.r'ted ate attend solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a andsy'aeiw0- mom tan egpllWM.or anOrnehDee petty 0a- daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in slIVTIROSenc coal sorter lermmin• recrlipliwpreSSOKinin.ddinoR me In )met the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and ""°'dM"'orns'kept Paine Me""riname. Crrk ro/M egMa ORlpe lM ereattocNd rra which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and cove', r ldo gt. ,M n In"w,.eran I "tom• Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and • acioninR rI«M1MamolaMMwrmlMa TM Blare d kldN f y SHIN M S wenia of such uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months cost tt; I"g tt COMt"Pe" Mall be tarns next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of SLITALSO KNOWNMa41M tan rldmepea certRl.d eyRN weMt Sly►I IMS Cann,* advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the ;nf°". y*DP/ Kamm) '^'Clan 70 United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions m MS Mr: *s Ban . of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that ';' DOCKET NO.e,i� PNullAPPLIMC'A,c,cn said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for 1°°°eWel Cory Road T D% t AVM D.191/9 LOnOrnancterreda deSOI publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning rime, of Or . of the laws of the State of Colorado;that a copy of each number of Rec:wes ,ste Ipc f c pwteme,Plan and Special Review MmR-.DpM<ot. said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was mining-or.r'Rer% modals Ira slInChnnanStesnclarcnno published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the E LEGAL D5cRIPTIORIPTION: SMM.ina/M,Ww.a.. subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed TMr sEw°"utter'w.,. Tewmalp z Rdrtnr. mode of business in this office. I'a^°"s West OF Me' «e.P.M.,Weld Co . . IV.Wetted* LOCATION:iSTo Mtoly,J mire n arwfd That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published the Town of Plre.te C Meer Wad, edlage t 10 fan Del-Cantina err.. *arid and ad;elM,ro w«d cwmy in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; sous Ng nos at noMM away 119 BOARD O►•COUNTY.COMMIssIONERs and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said . way>aware.coLDwoo BY,MARY ANN P!UERSTEIN newspaper dated April 11 19 89 - screw y CLERK AND RECORDnR I AND CLERK TO TN!BOARD RY:Mary Rem,Demon•,. DATED,Arils.19W pvaLISNED: Apes:IL.1179; iA fir HetnyfM Iterate' _ PWINIW'M.the D«W`Tlme -cell, Longmont.. CON Aor'1111.19e9 General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of April ,1989 NC\-\P<c\r♦e \--"• - 'A c'rcN. w vxQ Yv Notary Public FEE$ 22.94 V MY COt niSTOY ENnmp o, 1 e „n J 3 Ln.Y 51. t Y[npryi COL(�AJ�pjyll 14:10:?) 110 8903772 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL Longmont, Colorado 80501 IN THE MATTER OF 4 0 DATE: April 5 , 1989 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 26th day of April, 1989 , at 10:00 A.M. Docket No. 89-18 - Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant OFFICE OF THE L TO THE BOARD M BY: �/tA. i ,220 - Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled -_ on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO L. /rl iem +,6 jack, emsks sit _ r d iXH//3i7 ` 890372 . OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356-4000. EXT.4200 P.O.BOX 758 GREELEV.COLORADO 80632 COLORADO i APR 0 3 1989 - March 27, 1989 cOrinsie. - Phillip Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 8050] Dear Mr. Camenisch: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for an open—cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by April 12, 1989. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 7242("At CHAIRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the lei advertising expen ee 890372 ex/owl/Ts-7 • s 1 OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356-4000,EXT.4200 _- P . BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 ; C. C O COLORADO March 27, 1989 Phillip Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Dear Mr. Camenisch: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as SW} and the Si} of the SEI of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by ycu. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by April 12, 1989. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,CONT COLORADO At CHAIRMAN I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners. I agree to pay for the legal advertising expense. • 890372 Ex/e/Bir•-/) ii a P 104 454 740 • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED E1MAIL E. r! E 1 1 0 testi rand 2 Son eddidesti shims en dieted,tad cornpfett tons PHILLIP CAMENISCH the"OMNI TO'' on the Seem side.Pats to do the Mil f` n tl.• • 4.,. 10504 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 § x* foe Wettest servkeW F 6 wp,riEst Ste,and odds soaks.. 2. 0 LONGMONT, CO 80501 + JArtlde Attested to; .done) "< Mars.4, Ardcm ' er .790 PHILLIP CAMENISCH T of Service 10504 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 � W U frond � r.,; r�� -- — LONGMONT, CO 80501 O RrdRed COO p ilZets tiny.ape eiensRxe of eddna+rx, or nerd rid DATE DELIVERED. X •ir 7. Dn'ot pantiero �-, secs • --9 rag -g9 e s EOM Wilt w..1988 * us.o.P.o. wee-2i2-sea DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT A ;Es --••.....,./d/A,,,c7 OD co a I . a SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING CO:A;ISSION MEETING March 21, 1989 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on March 21, 1989, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor (#101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Bud Halldorson at 1 :35 p.m. Tape 342 - Side 1 Ann Garrison Present Jerry Burnett Absent Ivan Gosnell Present LeAnn Reid Absent - telephoned Lynn Brown Present Rick Iverson Present Jerry Kiefer Absent - telephoned Ernie Ross Present Bud Halldorson Present Also present: Brian Bingle, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary A quorum was present. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on March 7, 1989, was approved as distributed. CASE NLER: USR-874 APPLICANT: Phillip Camensisch REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation, material processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone, west of and adjacent to the Del Camino Area, south of State Highway 119, and east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7. APPEARANCE: Larry Brown, Consultant, Environment Impact for Gravel Pits, represented the applicant. This is a 240 acre site. The gravel at this site is deep and of high quality. There will be approximately fifty loads of gravel taken out per day. The expected length of operation is a twenty year plan. He also discussed the reclamation plans for this site. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. 890372 ex,tte, r e • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1989 Page 2 Ed Hodges, area resident, spoke in opposition to this request because of the number of gravel pits already in the area, truck traffic and the danger to area children and residents, dust, endangering underground water and irrigation ditches that run through the area, loss of native vegetation, and odor and noise from the batch plants. Tape 342 - Side 2 Dawn Hollinbeck, property owner directly across the road from the proposed gravel pit, is concerned about the safety of her children from truck traffic, dust, noise, and odors from the asphalt batch plant. John Copper, adjacent property owner, expressed his concerns over a possible drop in the water table, excessive truck traffic, dust, noise, and odors. Jim Lionberger, Attorney, Longmont, represented two area property owners. Both are opposed to this request because of the cumulative affects of having four gravel pits in this immediate area. Tape 343 - Side 1 Shirley Camenish reported they do not have any plans to mine the area where the houses are. The Chairman asked Brian Bingle to read the recommendation, conditions, and development standards as prepared by the Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. The Chairman called for additional discussion from the audience. Marlys Gosnell, area resident, spoke in opposition to the proposed haul route. Ivan Gosnell stated he and Lee Morrison had discussed his position as a Planning Commission member and a resident in the area of the proposed gravel pit. He will not be voting because of a possible conflict of interest because he has a biased opinion. MOTION: Ernie Ross moved Case Number USR-874 for Phillip Camensich for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation, material processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant be denied based on the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. 890372 • • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1989 Page 3 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. • Lynn Brown wished to express her concerns. This is a difficult case and she feels it is a request we can look at as a single use by special review or we can attempt to look at the big picture, and she thinks it comes in loud and clear that we have to attempt to look at the big picture. She is well aware that some of the testimony has been impassioned, but through that there are threads of concern that keep coming up over and over again that she does not feel have been adequately. answered. Several people have expressed concern over the air pollution and long-term affects. The water pollution, and even potential long-term ground pollution which may prevent future things from growing was not satisfactorily adaressed. There has been a lot of concern expressed over the water table and seepage from ditches. and again she did not hear any satisfactory resolution of these problems. She feels the traffic in the area is a concern. When we look at one use by special review, fifty or a hundred trucks doesn't look •like much, but this entire _ area is becoming a traffic concern and we are at the point where we need a large scale traffic study in this area. It is not appropriate for the Planning Commission to address the economic issues for anyone's individual business venture; however, this is clearly a case where we have to weigh one person's desire to have an economic venture against the health, safety, and welfare of an entire area. When we revised the Comprehensive Plan we spent a great deal of time discussing the future of the 1-25 corridor, and in particular the Del Camino area. Clearly, this area is undergoing major change. Presently, there is more commercial development in the area, Highway 119 is really the entrance into the City of Longmont, and there is a lot more housing in the area. . Tape 343 - Side 2 Ann raised the issue of how much dust one gravel pit generates vs two, vs three. She doesn't know if this is a linear or geometric progression, and she doesn't think that is the issue, but she feels we are at a point where the scales are in a balance and it is time for us to be responsible and say no. Ann Garrison stated she seconded the motion because she does not believe the staff's recommendation and development standards protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents. If it were the only pit in the area, she would agree with the staff's recommendation--that the development standards and conditions would protect the health, safety, and welfare of the people in the area, but she feels that such a concentrated use of the land in this 890372 • • Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 1989 Page 4 area for gravel pits has a potential to damage the health and well being of people who now live in the area as well as the people who will be living in the area over the next twenty years. Also, the I-25 area, around Del Camino, is an area the County has designated as a primary growth area over the next ten or twenty years. Having so many gravel pits in the area and the negative impacts they would have could hinder the economic development of the area. By approving this permit. we could be denying a lot of people uses and potential uses of their land. So this must be looked at both environmentally and in terms in the health and well being of people over a twenty year period of time, and from the County's Comprehensive Plan which states this area is a prime area for economic growth and development. She feels that if this area is going to be a primary area for gravel pits the County should look at an overall master plan for the gravel pits in the area--looking at them as a whole rather than having individual development standards and plans for each individual pit. It is her feeling that environmental impact of a group of pits is much different than the environmental impact of an individual pit. These are her reasons for seconding the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Rick Iverson - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; Ivan Gosnell - abstain; Ann Garrison - yes; Ernie Ross - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cktsoa Bobbie Good Secretary 890372 U • • BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY. COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CASE NUMBER: USR-874 NAME: Phillip Camenisch ADDRESS: 10504 Weld County Road 7. Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7, and south of State Highway 119. be recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners based on the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. VOTE: For Passage Abstain Against Passage Rick Iverson Ivan Gosnell Lynn Brown Lynn Brown Ann Garrison Ernie Ross Bud Halldorson The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on March 21, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 22nd 2 day of March, 1989. �b`1.la.wi. QO\` mO Bobbie Good Secretary 890372 ® • INVENTORY OF ITEMS SURYITTFD FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number Us`2 63-74 Submitted or Prennred \ Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 4)4 Pages . ✓ 2. 2 Application plat(:) '2. page(s) ' 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet 4. DI'S Recommendation 5. DPS Surrounding Propery Owner Nailing Lirt ✓ 6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List 7. 3 DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician 8. DI'S Notice of Hearing 7 9. DPS Case Summary Sheet 10. DPS Field Check ' 11. 12. Cr.*, ,-.-'* 1 leo 13. •..r r ...-z 3 eta 14. � 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. • 20. I hereby certify that the ,S items identified herein u ere submitted H. fhe Department of Planning Services at or prier to the scheduled Planning Cumin L•;•; It.n • hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to tlo. Board's office on tad 1941.D tr STATE OF COLORADO ) 6 COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME TUTS 7„ DAY OP_ .one-_ 1912-- SEAL, ,,.y w.imoWun c.p.res reD. 13, 1993 • • 06:—X///B/7 4 NO VARY Pnnf,rc: • • // Q �� EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case 1/ 5/G - L.C!/zezij.4)1, - . Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description //A -7--/,frT--774 // ..O / ' -/—iY.wrf/X2-er ift 21/ri',cJ.4.0-1772&7;166 // Il ?/ B. --4/!'41.t0'rj gain' - ,.?"..%_.L7-;J /s'Gnrm a : C. Am/1244,r £ ?%97J'4% 4, r J ' /Il r,94 : /h'ay./i�l; 7 D. / .//J t rt r .C;i t -71 Ze E. 44,0,oe.Z‘ (2,7, < , - / C. . (2:44.04 42d/ "0"1--75;) S --/l✓!I/.//p7 ' l/ i • H. (2)ffrune-N-- (1A(; 4n,I ) iMvi.) 4-14 i , A) ,ettl,A g•da cil),G i. 4111/41: r‘7677Act ': L. & A, , ie - !eve m. co4.4 ,7-,.__, i., 11 lei"--411.0 / N. �i e G1.4�LCv.... 1 890372 I , ._.___ ... ._. NITROOL A, vnw„y 872 'tart *;24;.• pomluoinR form denoting combination , 'a�:' Ilan.' N sulfeI mldo)- e. a drug..for the treatmentrigroges At/ r{;_ e f alterative radem henYl_ nl M•Mn'xan. C.H.NOa An oily,e :• and v. O(uloentive colitis., k for or th ire %Ad made by the •I. ;1.2i notion of strong nl{rle 1#1141 nlWlfaxOla Trade-ma* for the treatment banana;it ia employed as a flavoring sweat M1a ...`+s yybiM eultonamido)-thlasole, s drug .. Lambe �I 1 the name of artificial oil of bitter alnevn.L o/ �} •,� a ylhe pave lode• strong effort or strifesatrug e• of mtrbene• It is a powerful poison, _qi• • l Q L..effort]. 1. Any manifested ani. void in action.— \ ofnl'sus( desire for procreation species m hydrocyanic •2,The periodic) certain epeoiee of animals: rat"tro•tMn xol.Nitrobensone. in the alga 'asaprtis by niration of la•lean•See pyroxylin. •R' *Iry galled raison torrttatleus• 3. The oo . ohle ro•fo/rs't cAlorppitvin. rte • ,- ,• es:dr end n the urine.muscles for the pI ttto'eld •. the d'uDhrelD^ or the nt•tp•«r'Y•throl. C.S See o1O Erythdtyl ,�• ^•ty'Ip(1'e extAB.Anibal. of the tepeenitrate, prepared by nitration of the sJ - or larva of a louse. • „'. Mt lA8•hn n ro a under drie,te]• Fotaeslnm erythrol (tetrwhYdro:YbuLane): it expledeo NlnaMse See perounion. It i• used in the same mahast., C. Soren, nitrate. carbonate). .. .r ' nl'ter ( 1 ter. nitroglycerin. Dose.0.015-8.08 Cm.()'1•t O ..• nitrate or So tp na"tro•n5n'5 bO1 C.Ii.N.O.. #•Nitro- ,", e -�� rC ugile n.Sodium mutate. hyde.esc beaten,a derivative of fw(urel n. cubic n.Sodium nitrate. Ethyl easel^g beetertostatte and bnotanridal Dngrwllll► . rough es. Magnesium chic solution s'tibiae).is)• ,;r It is a lemon yellow, crystalline cteie powder,— meet spirit otn alcoholic ethylwater.goe . rut.An Qoohoho of 2�so .lightly soluble in eei.from oienr.lAe(M •+. nitrite spirit, it fevers.Dose. nl'tp•aM edlren;C.Ps^C°I • • A popular draDhorati0 in mild --�{�aed]•N � 14.009•A nonmetallic, • • (trot mien. • existing free in the atmosphere, of which it seas - on,0s•Symbol,bacterial about 7the by weight.A co hiehr elm �•• ti nl'rom Thed uoleguferment obtainedetitutes life. r1 ,r- nl'tra•aln.eA nitrifying.' 1 of n, milli, plants, lees nth incapable of sustaining ] from the root tubercles pigh+tran�to. inert, and combines directly mar P1gh'truh•meig, •min. it is relatively important directly s r . _ 40mt1 n0 tra•e.A ( t ,2. but few °temente• An 't sent r - nt.retlen. he p See al end vegetable tissues. See .. .., - E of tuttto acid, reacting •4 ma Values of Blood Constituents in rte • dies' nl'Mb.A salprocess of combining or Normal wrw nl•va flora.The D ADDe^d�• between tl -with nitric acid, used for a dye. sodium The difference 1°1�.Vat used as n•balance. of son a betwee the nitninde• Trade-mark pap dreatenit intake (as protein) n'l .7aeM t i aze tr ed paper n treated with f urine.dye nitrogen excretion. If the nitrogen is in intake ammo �4a•) .n es Niter, Q. Stripe of D p pH n excretion, a subject •, the daterminati) of the Dthe tiro If the nitrogen intake our.ds tM i ate used for nY 67-7 Niter,9.0. m .A ligotd ng wn e a nitrogen excretion, the nitrogen f0 b er balance then w . attic sine(etidum eSU0 ) being water: (\tyV n excretion 6 HNC., the—remainder irritating odor V tit,*_If the nitrogen nitrogen balance is th and is Etc. grcei irrl Itogen'lntabe, toxin i negative the . .. . . . -. D°�•esstvee ohareoW''dsow,.0ooaeionallY n.dioxide.NtOa• ornally, r fo d.dm t.Ns01. trio w dam the from the ..,. •' the is purpose well diluted wa n wane ,com The 4me utno ih a bet' _ e•stimulant; external gem loy also nand the opting bet ee the erine .. 7SsFs% the same Dtttlross Mlly, employed of s Drotei alto that taken m. as s heDatle o. paDo . for venereal and f nitrogee equal \, • . ,•'+' I I an diluted with prtleulerl0y •b oc. (J-B min.). amount o_,de•Nitrous oxide. e^ end,•! _ ry'mppYv tine of a rends of nitrogen f• uming n Nitricers. Dose, s., mustard• c• of which try to ...> well diluted e.water. more or reddish eth 1au18de (4 )e hic Diethyl'LS. A. •• A n.a. acid containingit a of diohlorodi Y l CIT.CII.of color anwhich asahloroothY1)amino. . ( ,C Nt)1. nn I!,ltbh ��. /• nitrous tetroxide. aweshis WyhloroethYl)emine, saW.tn color and oaums it to fume. note;L. `tY, •*K' ; N eion of he nit the form of water-soluble h have �e 1 w �r 4, color ammonia a d ga nitro^, Mtrevenoaaiy adminis lung de.cr • facer,to makel.The ecomPo ride into nitrous and The e.eu� "' "' 11 I going on in useful in the tread ant of leukemia.T• I ' ammonia and the inil once oo e&tai Ro lYmph0setp°ma' chronic It kemia. 1 end ts. II - .Suer aoeds, a proton tna and gen mustards poe ass warfare*genie u ,Im.. . l inutile*under the in4ue)' of trify in ban of interest es potential ohemioal e : nit t. .. .., a Raij. n miorObrpP• - I 'I other wgePeleF n4reR Jacare].A nttrityl a .s, pentaslda.The solid substance 1\ b•+ _ _ nl'tent (r 1 le oomDound with water to form nitric oxide. s da. N.O. A toxic gas resultant a lenvi�a lam, no 4)tft cN co .St. ^'V toxic Also ant l' nl'trlle (ngreni.lern of CN nitrous aci .. .. exiitst er of-dtrogep_ o d& n t s_. amp 1 ooatwloiog Lha mo ov aoid. Bee antpt ,psns�e, fraction of p(troae° t '• ! 'I Belt of asiu sodium goal .v hir , • Want,. ren). Aym Ptatio nonpMeln n. The • _ .ypty,,*, • ethyl nitrite, potassiumtrues,urine,and excreta,not 9nre I nitrite. produce the dilatation es the blood t• precipitants such as s• , tDsst �I I increased The ra nitrite D blood rsionvof by the usual protein Dr'ecpi blood vessels. diminution sleeendrd. They are tun0tat.Symbol.N l' nilrnn:prs'1 of .r_ �714dia1.inet I tneren.ed I,t,pro!the puke. e.neUa boo.•tpdj'N• l the motor rooters in cs in wthme. and anginaM•tra( n C Ile ! •wale. ContemtnF.utrote r ite�ur•tn). •,,r' I i a n hys rical consmenorrhen. in oasa, 1 onti M e,er.In (nigh fro a s . - 1 '� Glonoin. glYooryl trinitmte: " i � ,11 ctoria. In ep.xmodie Y Iw;one,and in Oaxd. n the notion of nulN��w. - epileptic iand man giv with high arterial tof the he. see.Full oily liquid produced by Powerful t to l.' 'flW • of throbbing, t. nd h hind of lace, glycerin. A P° 1 rends•let 11 does in wive use .forms.4wnitric, logic upon the actions of the whld''t ;„IwN,ei physiologically, nitrite. .t i.ttert and h 6 e° mires, urnel,Lik raphs. ese. I. more persistent than amyl nl'tA.tNd legion; urinal.The presence meet resembles.Dose.0.3-1.2 ma (3400--}3001 v't r • PbY�eR ! ,voided. inane:0.Durso, .in the use whene.oh re^yhs triagrd 2 rani t Y 1Vs1i• nl M• or nitrites,oe both, n.sNrlt(arVit 12 et.ll' eA of nitratescoholle solution.Dose.0.0-032 eal4y Leon- '-•• • • ninF form denoting n.tablets((ebellas ofosnol • ,}J I I of IN l enceolrw l^ts^.roatmenNt re&° NO.- 2. A p ,r r," the �1V �' 0.7 /.«••° ` • ry41 • t ,, glues 1005 $UMNCIt,F.W. 1 ▪ 1.• Siunivslees, ^r'' 1 ♦ enoe401.ie similar tohth thatogic of .ul action of ointment toted auliurr In a baseniture u of wool fat,white bon 064 • ' I •,`/� Dank it is more slowly absorbed and lees wax,and white petrolatum. yminatea,It is used as•hypnotic,Does, winked a. (sulfur Inure),Sublimed sulfur width ' ? n,•00-30 gr.).ems cu(foea has been washed with • dilute solution of mu- ,� '..'::... .,, on So a.wato. ,ul'fo'pnen'yl•ate. 1. Phenol- moats to remove trees of aid.It is the preferred snlfvr } ;�'ps' a ,silt or ester of phenolsulfodo acid, form for Internal administration.Dose,4-12 Cm, w of • e "emtltl if l'2' I'henyleulfate.a salt of phen- (1-3 drachms). 'soles add - : /rack'' arid,C.l[.080m1i. ssti'fn•ra"ted.Combined with sulfur. ,). ; (air,. 'w ,r,.lhu n yl•,at•.Sulfophonata.Q.V. aul'fu•ra"tor. An apparatus for applying sulfur b'"nak"aL • gib rl'bcyl le acid. SO.H.Cd{r.Okl.COOH.- fumes for purposes of disinfection. the A'sltss s,A wiles or nearly white,mYstalline powder, sul•fu'rlo acid (oMdum sr.(/urin,m):An aqueous • —axe. - ter...•axsnt(or albumin. solution containing ab,ntt 00% of HSOc; occurs aass'id, r a^salt'(rul'fo•sawlt ).A salt of sulfonlo and. as a colorless, odorless liquid of oily consistency; cede acid. (;, r el lc ge Id(Sul"fo'vy nick,•vin'iok).CAM- it is miscible with water and eleohol with the A askof • , N�p4 ,,,)wlsulfuri° acid formed by the Intern. evolution of much heat, and is very caustic and dam.t sulfuric acid and ethyl alcohol. corrosive. It is widely employed In the arts and • 6 y•32,006.A solid,nonmetdllo element, sciences.Also Called oil of vitriol.. • ,e ,,..w.yellow,brittle mass or in transparent diluted e.acid(acidity's cuifur(Oum Witham).An (aa�Ia'alte. rem' , ,o�ifoationehombic � Insolublstals and e water, eacin a aqueous 100 tau occurs as•tion sccolorless,odorless liquid. es tY Seal ' noiehte in alcohol and ether,and soluble It is used like other adds in gastrin hypoeoldity W Si.air,,,disulfide.The solubility varies with the except that it is also astringent. Dose. 0.6-2 00. CM.d• a.aa„s,i,,,a Sulfur,In contact with living tissue. (10-90 min.) taken through•glass tube. ass„1 sin ien sulfide. Due to it.local irritant sul't...rout. 1. Of the nature of sulfur. 2. Coca- , tmewt or eras"• wpm the mucous membrane. hydrogen hind with sulfur; derived from sulfur dioxide, caeca .a41. provokes intestinal peristalsis,and, there- SO.. . aetitity. � .,altar exerts a laxative influence.The hydro- sul'fu•rous act Id. HSO.• A solution of 80. in :. vlmeffog x� r ,,,aids farmed may exert a toxin action on water. It hes been used internally m a gastric *as ( yM000l parasites, and sulfur has been reeom- antiseptic, and externally in the treatment of ns0ga , t .ed"t in the treatment of enterobissis. The various skin diseases. eta mns,rtant uses of sulfur aro external. In Sulkowiteh reagent.See under reagent. end oak • wars, will, the skin, especially in the presence Sulkewltch's test.See under teat. Lineal,,. �• of alkali'.,there forms eithor hydrogen sulfide or a multiage(OF.soilleg.j.Sewage. ..La . tnlythb,nin acid, The compound formed is an Sullivan'.test.See under test. tp ', .)... emir,poison to various pathogenic parasites;and, sul'plsat•.See sulfate, use.G,r,, sulfur is used in diseases such as sul.phe"me.glo"bl'ne'mda. See eafltersoritsU. . trehw, ringworm, and tavue. Sulfur is also used nem(a. C' a slumber of nonparasitio diseases of the akin, suipttetrone.A trade-mark for 4,4'.bis(v-phenyl-e. fat Ak, ,,.,. 4 serh as erne,peoriaeie.and seborrhea.Sulfur also .. propylswino)•diphenylaullfone4etraeodl urn sultan- „ - pet many uses in Industry, Precipitated sulfur, ate.s crystalline•water-soluble compound which '• k fora "' '1.:'- whines.'sulfur,and washed sulfur are oflielsl. is being investigated for possible clinical value # ermallns e. ointment (unouentum sulfurs in the treatment of tuberculosis. "'-' elWMnm). contains 20% o ins fsublimed sulfur In suhur.This spelling hes beemehan an l'p gad to sulfur, add. y.. •I.sr..h,tum base made alkaline with potassium which is now official 1n the G.S. Pharmacopoeia data( nabente. sod in the publications of the American Chemical ., MONISM a. This form of sulfur may have some Society. _ . _..„ � ,• ,,.,. tasomeetic action analogous,when injected intro- sum. Some. take;sumendw• to be taken;used as • Mnusly, to that of foreign protein injections. direction in prescriptions. Dredu4'Sr,', ., tVlnidnl sulfur ie available on the market under sumac, su'snach (shQ•'mack, sue meek) (Ar. •�a - a begetter of trade names, eummagl. A name appliedto various specie. of r ..t w• *Moment' a. ointment (unguum nt sulfuric Raw and Toxicodendron. Among the substances • „� , *Moment'aw.pe.ltm). Contains calehsm carbonate, 10 to which the irritant properties of the poison Om,; sublimed sulfur, 15 Cm.; Juniper tar. 16 sumac, are ascribed.are toxieodendrol• toxiea Out.;soft soap,30 Cm,;solid petroxolln,30 Om.; dendrin, lobinol, urushiol. There Is also present *rosier I.make 100 Cm.Alm called Wilkinson'sointment, much tannin and fixed oil, rein, wax, Also see a1-, ;.y, 'Mike's itch ointment. poison sumac,poison sums)extred• :m••.;:'' gait of s.Precipitated sulfur. sesm'bul(At.aunts!)(eumbul).Condit.of the dried ' ''it , &,:;:, preslplt rated a. (sulfur Dino( italum).The form rhizome and roots of Paula .ambit, or of other • i'F`, el sulfur obtained by adding hydrooblorle acid to closely related spades of Pouts possessing • ,,c?:" a solution prepared by boiling sublimed sulfur and characteristic masklike odor..It contain resinous -, .u:-":. 4s)o with water.Because it is finely subdivided It matter ands small portion of volatile oil.Formerly . Rrlfrs r•- b more readily suspended in liquids than are other used in treatment of various hymeneal conditions. • vwvw'.. Ms.of sulfur, Does, 1-2 Cm.(36.30 gr.).Also called musk root. +ss`.+'•. ' r`',. euMlmed s. (sol/ur subtimotum). The form of s.attract(exerodum sun ••..' _, - ' sulfur obtained by subliming native sulfur. 'fad)' Aoeer 0.3-0.0 Cm. (5-10 gr.).Also called mwk root eirrmt. ;,s;. •d4xlde.80.. A colorless.nonlnfammable gee wm'rna'tieel(L.summa,mtm1.The accumulation ' +4`,1 •" , Mth a strong euaseajing odpr: with water it of effects,especially of those of muscular.sensory, .,, C' f77 pm.sulfurous acid. It 1s a powerful bleaching m mental stimuli.+•aumunetNMl.adj. tk 'pmt, due to its reducing properties. If Inhaled Of stlmisll.An aftereffect produced by several • ' • state. it proves fatednee subthreshold stimuli on tinges causing succeeding"w t ,•Cta ass ,isinfeetent,by burning m a closes room,has equal stimuli to become effective. �� been prnrtioally abandoned. It Is used for the eum'mer e'nsp'tlon.Miliaria. . Preservation of dried fruit.to prevent darkening rseurnnt S.e.Hydros,aoolniforme. r.. ,, during the drying.It is also used for its bleaching Sumnsersen-Ssrkar method.See under sighed. +;.. plepertles in many Industrial Drocessea - •-• Sumner, F. W. (SmQtie# surgeon, contemporary). ii\\ 7„,.. . ..... 890372 -•...IV. ti, kil 0 yYJ tyaletM efx4dMt nnralRn liNibiow red r ��+1� second b)a m 74ted I r t a+n l IL. <u• nd(see rol)+rf.U bee mill Mt vm C nR e°r�w nb sea•etm•L'n ��.t naR ued by pt• reprnM Its, '.r)�, �eepDww e4e °t 1 ft tsars,et<.,to indicate that nlariHetm^rem teventuaUY al t)the Conbinatar d two- — ie used in 4w after feffeet • • specified time unless the formation d rote( pipmJ e utke Permanent ould tand dmh , cadd pp�x�gsw 4'°MM above �dstwg d the 1♦ded, dl or unless it is changedeatwP nwti ro iW. Nraae. �' - a s shown why It•hnl not, .t°Yen dlnxtd e r sh.ben geaer her Procasdtoryn used m maklnF nitrk se, yWOs14 intro. 1,3:•—Mss'. hi)Or w un aaa)({b.f "t biota:user arid.tow sett see i iwa)foundin of < t. Nwh° G w• P • ' r rya Wetml had be a e dTwnaluawar �/aa4.r trpx.• !tUftosummon )ad•ts the ta•1 Md been nitroAen flntWn 1.sM eetvertioft d0•Alainaatone1+am far�: Ma'udet o(twe• tart sctursa.p whkA a itenthe rota mince OY s011 b•e�'2.tsar oo„ mdve hu OwP aOuet 1onY d Varku tie noduln d mrtem letrymar .nitraaae aid eitl0genotu aa�•vpnt garltaaY/J. • 'Iml= x ✓tat w on fter tried and Turd by any d van trbeeeapede•, sag.$n(e7 d' " •' 3■� 4_,, CMw, at or eo1_N", I.p�.on but(nben).� *mat) P. aND�atxicaiad N li d (rdto milt atraR¢ar lta 1 a•-..-im) w.(Mods, < L,N t 'ms. -in herrwat ai.pd fftte a eahnder Cut dYe a hot in nl•tr0i•n•toof ,rib,. T S nth,tanWuml tee utn,.4p.1 a '.pd rertin,t to act lLs wrfww:heat used by the in tuh -compoundsMagna to combine a emtcrt element,pteagioeh irvsle)World r fendear n vor! wili. to NMoQm mwtrrd my of r['sew of ComDouoiN�• an.roan 00m9en a of• - ✓ Chrome mews to lad v-n_ Wawa(L. < wfin, PP. m,uferd Itws,but h•vuk oral in tie treetmeus�f I.- at. bad. Y$ioe at ww,vsle lfor de• impulse ally PC:bail.Ds a JJ00., , fu(I1NEbsae�ttN<OE.hw.fw,akin to(..war i.the au+aoen,tam: uwd e. U the.b;1;(Yiii ate. b. K °,Pius•. w.crate.) nitrogen nartdfa redact U ea).Cot. W or 1 tr^w, rei:�eA( louwr nrt.Dro 10 ee,etc, used stet huskily.M Eby tar mh sit •much lucre dteo•aaw Co��k m o mars)(<4 W"..(Om r • n!or Iouea so stroll✓inaeet e s r E rb .Gr. vas f a! im d 400 feet li W L art 4'7;4. ,Y(nU ar) n [ME�win<H I a�pyps.:�li2. ter< n. .e as by tri. as.)•aF•of or oottraiM sliest ��.. dKnt•trpft•a•Mw(Itt )•7natrw tad.P.e3^ M nftm$en caf^Dafmda Ih s Cs< (M8 N ,yt•w(rl hoar le) Bri1. tt..0,YaI tit wrteJan S.ewmW 2h e•as•In, nl•tre•ilyt' .a e 1 (dstra .sear m. e, ax psis oi•, ti r ON, mane F tc Auto,chieAYe• cal of Rio de Janeiro elate. • e1V+Yal w. o thick. pale-yellow. fWnmbl with a mix• �1 — J < 1l}, tltt .r..' SE role) Pby troattaY lYce te, ! i�s 'Wines<K1tMY .'Rlle ErL)a.P°9+ N. 243,°e°its((or mont>+-ARV) GH,(ONOric, sulfuric ids:u�in meAkh,a end to _ e' sltoya bbuuda , y' ' •er•Y-i a. !)w.,pl.-whoa( sun of norm and wtfurk _ (( 9r dynamite and pawl(arte s sett ea k S Jenaraja o, '0i,�r"' )tsar a wrtMc41° <la rmrn.IL' earns+or .i' �t dynamites Mid (-ht dra wawa - JpelowerCeetmbeeeny.,Y°' p.l/k�fe1rr)R.1101tb• anew wilds seats + y '1 S•ttilap[1 •e) W ..;rbP^•� ♦t •lot(n4Wksta)S/_a. y( t uch scan- N.eite of Md ed.h the generd formula, NOX)NO.. i `' Dip dr nap 2.eery,woos.. ' - — t'so petty dcaib:a ed brye(t vow!,1 �� nittow std on Nlropt+d ) 1 j h:Intl 2 o,ot.tetq)-'ee.w - re seen as Nrtace:used rein'.a • ate formed by the at mss tar) w. id on n + .0. l) •^ odd or[ • men. nMilt) o is�lvm n lrate,used ol.trom•e• ( , tar wmaunt d nitralpn,or east•„ I•li tiY.e u m 'e,p.�ed M .,�. - sate(Acid 2. ' (Fr, 'um w rate. h e main° emitted A flit t o fi,or J ,gbi remark 6..a eaurae wc,ea it. potassium •frrt•In3 to treat or contrite ors weans'ComPaunda• Abet•cwt,tr re .,:, - r fart n li- nitrate slum de,•tea•) i d0.1 r d or•nitrate;.P..to make tnt0• a(.dn(d ua Dienw,a nittgRP Dorn- tedtsudtaok ,_�, , ,ntmd aci r dons nitrating: t nM.x . t>onor. < r:ynlda-,e c • pa•Uon lid tH than) n.the into •biti Np•o�,to• red from.^Y mamba of the mm Win..N0.[ro D q(nn <bees 0f ri ...- ntetrod'M•tont t Pt,d lnithirmu9•s•wens c m 1,,,or fin series of hydra arbona and ooaaaa4 wftt.e di defnk d )�}Mree ink CM'cnk) F L In he correspond- in plate of one or more Of the hY 44< �from to t.,„•ntml s.^ .„amine nitrogen 2. AnutnwNni or a.lnine( r dock(1 v)in =in . T her valence than in the rortnponA- ni,cr••, dray&a mlo distal,S slay wiles! 1.0 .ucnacid manus oo:Wu i}(w'iN fartlyry 7aMN di oditta,&titayy r nnrout co ^m wrist)any o[a reel, d pee 'r cwt a01d a N orlear,y(um;M[acid. HNO.,that)e hkfhlY IQ t is o M C s ✓rwtw: prepared by the action of atlfvric so on at- njmine and(n7aatr �).al.(tee S[J dnipnatitg of t0naiting r, ems Mn rod by the oxidation at ammonia, the,vtO r•d,ed.a croup lwb lake b WC..... `h• '•... Rbacteria us Nit•obader, ni•tte•so- (rat teb•eb) (<,L. afhenu• fdt d wagon,< ' fort ld)o otL. nit aikla•color eca ass, N , o (d b nitro*:tee xrtewla toabtwist faro stasis:of or conatn• yy), •(p'Pp <•. .a vt ._.,/•that cvnwrt n(tnte mho notes• d a the•clan of N ill d$ppr�.� .r1._w. . erne aside w colorless a di y rD w.m he'air by various i u jy7Ool 4�• alai; n[trtl•N) s.(< pm. + -NIA i Ottawa Rierrt,tJ6, . r.. nine acid •I Il o¢d)a.( 0 tar mtrno rdkd.m tlraawibrurr: see>rtrupp-) f• d; •L.t`WpWskerrflfer..:Yh- pl•Ooas l ing nit. 2.swos:se or d N^arrap ei.r+w w, f tide(nVtrid)n.(weTtiw elm Haas[.pa+uioad of nitrogen Itke,M ton rasa) MJ• Ada T or lamp i ' eT.more elxtroptrl n Pr. ritriJur: sea which ditftgen hu o Iowa.vda¢p than a treNoottsD^^d' M. f nL star ,•4. .e... r.tr1lY (n{RN f.,) r.'fldw•,iih tnttaiai ar Pfaagen coat• dau twmDtunN XN ktlotrt adY N tpRatht or id •..� -,ens r the o i.to combu(amm ate.) ve,th oltrate J.to nitrous wild.n.cid.( HO.,) 'ends 2.to to nit raw atmospheric the damn boatels rte seals end s�e N it.,,w.... acr a a eta nit of (ammonium ads• sm�pr•mtp nlvitn•�dthe rctth dstar A.Balis MOW act etc.)to rotate and nitrates,All: s•d'in e. seesaws,etc.)tart convert ble N .tied a° Ws� 'j^`•''"Y WI tweten>.etc.--N•M•gene Ur said prop :T •Mte(nistril,'till) n.(nRe-+-4e,n.ula used in yielding eld•ii 1 nitrous oxide a colorless.uanflttmma of M atonic cYenide d des¢eared ammonia on y&oR•Cfn_ nc an sn atetc and itinerate* full d nits ' t e r bawl a acid and ammonia on hydrdYab _,•,%•,_(mt2)•p.-tbe - ntanaan d canwv) k paeus w �a-1 • Sittig nPar[ni)a^.(w„x-+ .,v¢7 a ads a rtes of nttau. .ny(pty F¢rW�l^•(ehymlhti .. ( anipty lie actual.We. facts.elemenu.issues.rut. ndlss user,r Ne.�I SI•n[t t G d ,for G..Kil,not)a w try J. � two.. ° b a•sn(nirtm)adl•L<R.11edeuM•t`^ga�ta'r.oamDof!nda e(Np r(nnrwiV)n.lwq'�le Dnraon �'. " the ectan o ntlnc d 4 I oeda D- s1 .,rt' twiMa in hick I: wnd Drt�Quced�NOr radical or corn. )Env+wTl•situ tar.C Parif e. Tow. ' g out of o u earl a "♦"er.. .. AeMM in which rim mores tr0a radicals have reds MAP* (ntI w see�)►wads d Net Zealand:loo a.ml.; • t dds - s' i 1twn.Id hydrogen, n rr m fI.v 5 oars wbia).Mf1w1 d. I[T aTieT• T v. Mara•(ditrb. airs) (ape warts)a tOlAbiwiwa lets N . a(nit and.,ena� ~ <six con. ;l. :obits,tit•,` 'ee s, I.the presence of nitrogen compou compounds made by ol•vd(m din�•ML Ml. (L. ewes. nhovey. sae pcec.) :y+.�. ,�r,r.Mr.of nitre the nitrous oft the NO*lath l(tother iro' stye'Qu$ ( r. @ (twmar pfo es (vwNld 3.n 2. presence anon;,nowttb d C I✓)1//.Jr y - • ratet'b . niter ntal - ' ere•tnac•re•rt•a (ntrted sale t42 a) n.if.. that. the 0i1 NPraMe (nd re"0 toki°11 dxsea.G:sass ¢ikhi)(G. sin.haste'.. It la 5$ n�., r aa)(poorly., me Dirac,r rseyts bacteria Na, (oils) a. , e,G. eat.. water smite ammonu compoC PAC ILI into niMtes,or nitrite. rut. [em. < ONO. tYu' ewb 1„ stile cases tie ••/li rhn[e.:see NITRIC ent'a, a prnatn ewb err 'd a a,akin to O8.siaor•.V �aa boamT s.. r , Duo ben•aane (.ben•sen) w. • tcoleo^Our ya1 'a.,.atwwPs•.wwtar s Cuaww yfa.a rotor 1a ,. ry x• ,itp,mains anired by treating Mnwne witR nittb sAd. wR•n••Safte•wjnit�i�d of humor or ysrttY T,tn•n form ) et.1. : p . , �s�tI in mak.^p a(weir••..a')a. etc. te,veuaMy ems[W.a w sate M •tW.tu•Ioe(-aeVyOo lea/n,any star d nd acid °m,.'d•(tile.!)n,/aa. 1. 00 2. ¢ot at all 1 .♦ ). :. •"t, ;'Pee ssllvinroi esp.,o on wood.cotWaratae etc.vi the Oceania by the enla• (nUw ate.(G.eider)(swig) a 7, 1 t I $ — , .. d d treae aces upon emokalea an veto, •LSlar�p• 1• aWy� 1. ILf line/.lT�•D. notb crated autfurie add:used In malo^P forbid S . dwirw• b dirDpot'e d a past a ) •/ . .. .• ve., 1 tia,lecduen.eto..—N mood w•lae'le F .•tueu�or rejection—•r.(tllaegl. Meal . (saran ynorran fyoa tank n.(wino••h attDb . ? zie mown)191Y :J1eh prwd. M "'~ is.. �Qmwtiw, Cctf,O.7'i.Or. used to treat e ad Ndrnt of U.S. tat)9- •v(!land)&Pe. ;flu •i ' "-C <A<. to g0ve.a 1.tar trad. 1 l' tv pp0t(nines fan)x.(Ih.ellw[)ftt:> • element NLs of(d rem•`ed 9- )r k !}. h. k" ly ffi morons itmosp wiper.to order.arrange' ""' intf+a 2•In-)K• w.' rwer1Y four fifth,.of the atmosphere:it is a cor¢po• d the loteear wdw Tttl°rarmy—atoms • A�hnl % aT by • . " n change:•Yard, t. ac N.,f4.OD67;as no,. eha•rwt•add1.m tbs in regular O• r�'.,. siiy,1.7506 g/i(Oct)"rode.pt.,-200.7C:boil,pt.. an w. _ new C % IN:M:1.:yet:doe:PM:W W MMS aL.lirni O.AK v( Mnnr,1.R.fses I yy. '• �port Nn,avtn;h.ldta:cif.Rbrs,Mel.Irak[e0.ewY.wt (lsb7):h.Ml:K h� t,0.MRypp ydetli 'dated PO eta hp,.✓e sahN.iin ewfh.ebreeMY.ata Ftett ' e.1rat(praaun; tID. ?' - in:r, h.ea.II, O.rob:kb. 0.dash.Sea tilde float corer. % ti Air ,.,•' 896372 • • DATE: March 21, 1989 CASE NUMBER: USR-874 NAME: Phillip Camenisch ADDRESS: 10504 Weld County Road 7, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7, and south of State Highway 119. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Sections 24.7, 44.1, 44.2. and 44.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff chat the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Mineral Resource and the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area goals and policies. The extraction of a commercial mineral resource is encouraged when the mining plan promotes reasonable and orderly development of the resource. The conditions of approval and development standards will ensure that the goals and policies of the plan are met. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a use by special review. The proposed site is not classified as prime farm land. The proposed reclamation plan includes agricultural and recreational uses. - The proposed use will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. USR-627, Zigan's open-cut mining operation, is located north of and adjacent to the proposed mining operation. USA-511 and USR-488, Western Paving's open-cut mining operations are located adjacent to the proposed site's west and southwest boundaries. The proposed use will continue to be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses and with the future development of the surrounding area as projected by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. • 1 890372 • • • • Phillip Camcnisch USR-874 Page 2 • The special review permit site is located in the 100 year floodplain. The special review development standards and conditions of approval address the overlay district requirements. No other overlay districts affect the site. - Special Review permit development standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and the County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special. Review permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Prior to recording the plat, the owner/operator shall satisfy the following: - The owner/applicant shall obtain approval of an off-site road improvements agreement from the Weld County Commissioners. The agreement shall mitigate impacts generated cn County roads by the mining operation. A fugitive dust plan approved by the Weld County Health Department shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. - The operator shall furnish evidence he is insured to the extent of not less than $100,000.00 against liability for any negligent act or omission by the operator from the operation or maintenance of the sand and gravel pit and the extraction and production of sand and gravel and all activities connected with or incidental thereto. 3. Prior to recording the plat, the Use by Special Review plat shall be amended to show the following: 890372 2 • • Phillip Camenisch L'SR-874 Page 3 - Access for the proposed open-cut mining operation shall be relocated to show ingress and egress between phases #1 and #2, - Location of the asphalt and concrete batch plant shall be relocated away from the residence in the southwest quarter and relocated on the northwestern portion of Phase I of the use by Special Review site. - The following note shall be placed on the Special Review plat: "Mined Land Reclamation Board has the authority to issue permits for mining and reclamation activities. Activities related to mining and reclamation are therefore under the jurisdiction of the Mined Land Reclamation Board; however, Weld County has jurisdiction of those matters outlined in the Development Standards." - All rights-of-way or easements located on the Special Review site, specifically those belonging to Panhandle Eastern Pipeline, shall be shown on the use by special review plat. 4. Prior to excavation occurring on the special review site: - The applicant shall submit evidence that the use will not cause injury to vested or conditional water rights as set forth in Section 44.4.11 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. - The owner/applicant shall provide an adequate water supply for consumption and sewage disposal for the proposed site. - An NPDES permit shall be obtained or amended from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health; and - An Air Emissions Permit shall be obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the permit to control fugitive dust and odors. ▪ The special review site shall be in compliance with the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission's Regulation No. 6. In particular, the provision relating to nonmetalic processing operation and hot-mix asphalt batch plants. pp��My� 8903 l 2 3 • • Phillip Camenisch USR-874 Page 4 5. Prior to the excavation occurring on phase #2 and phase #4, the owner/applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services showing that the Army Corp of Engineers' requirements pertaining to wetlands and the realignment of the Idaho Creek have been satisfied. Q 4 890372 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Phillip Camenisch USA-874 1 . The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit is for a open-cut mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant located in the Agricultural zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24 C.R.S. , as amended. 3. The open-cut gravel operation shall comply with Section 44.4 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: Operation Policies. Any violation of these regulations shall be grounds for enforcement of Section 44.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: Cancellation of Permit. 4. All operations on the proposed site shall be in conformance with the Weld County Flood Hazard Overlay District Regulations including: a. No fill, berms, or stockpiles shall be placed in the one hundred (100) year flood plain of the Idaho Creek which would obstruct passage of flood flows; and b. All fuel tanks, septic tanks, temporary buildings, and any other hazardous items that might wash away during flooding shall be securely anchored and adequately flood proofed to avoid creation of a health hazard. Following completion of mining, all temporary buildings shall be removed. 5. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted on the Special Review Site. 6. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 70 dB(A) , as measured according to C.R.S. 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 7. No building shall be constructed within the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line's rights-of-way. 8. No Trespassing Signs shall be posted on the perimeter fence and maintained to clearly identify the boundaries of the special review site. 9. Fugitive dust must be confined on thit site in accordance with the approved Fugitive Dust plan. 5 890372 • Phillip Camenisch USR-874 Page 2 10. Vehicular traffic shall ingress and egress Weld County Road 7 via State Highway 119. No haul traffic shall be allowed south bound on Weld County Road 7. 11. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 12. The septic system for the proposed office is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in accordance with the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 13. The Weld County Health Department requires that this facility provide restrooms and/or vaulted toilets. Portable toilets are not acceptable under the Weld County ISDS Regulations. 14. An ISDS evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing system. 15. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 16. The Special Review site shall be maintained in compliance with the approved NPDES permit at all times. 17. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 18. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 19. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 20. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, Longmont Fire Protection District, State Health Department, and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 890372 6 +� (1, Phillip Camenisch CSR-874 Page 3 21. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 22. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. • 890772 7 I I t • • • 8.1 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANTS 8.1.1 Generall-2 Asphaltic concrete paving is a mixture of well graded, high quality ag- gregate and liquid asphaltic cement which is heated and mixed in measured quan- tities to produce bituminous pavement material. Aggregate constitutes over 92 weight percent of the total mixture. Aside from the amount and grade of asphalt used, mix characteristics are determined by the relative amounts and types of aggregate used. A certain percentage of fine aggregate (2 less than 74 micrometers in physical diameter) is required for the production of good quality asphaltic concrete. Hot mix asphalt paving can be manufactured by batch mix, continuous mix or drum mix process. Of these various processes, batch mix plants are cur- rently predominant. However, most new installations or replacements to ex- isting equipment are of the drum mix type. In 1980, 78 percent of the total plants were of the conventional batch type, with 7 percent being continuous mix facilities and 15 percent drum mix plants. Any of these plants can be either permanent installations or portable. Conventional Plants - Conventional plants produce finished asphaltic concrete through either batch (Figure 8.1-1) or continuous (Figure 8.1-2) C mixing operations. Raw aggregate normally is stockpiled near the plant at a location where the bulk moisture content will stabilize to between 3 and 5 weight percent. As processing for either type of operation begins, the aggregate is hauled from the storage piles and is placed in the appropriate hoppers of the cold feed unit. The material is metered from the hoppers onto a conveyor belt and is transported into a gas or oil fired rotary dryer. Because a substantial portion of the heat is transferred by radiation, dryers are equipped with flights designed to tumble the aggregate to promote drying. As it leaves the dryer, the hot material drops into a bucket elevator and is transferred to a set of vibrating screens and classified into as many as four different grades (sizes). The classified material then enters the mixing operation. In a batch plant, the classified aggregate drops into four large bins according to size. The operator controls the aggregate size distribution by opening various bins over a weigh hopper until the desired mix and weight are obtained. This material is dropped into a pug mill (mixer) and is mixed dry for about 15 seconds. The asphalt, a solid at ambient temperature, is pumped from a heated storage tank, weighed and injected into the mixer. Then the hot mix is dropped into a truck and is hauled to the job site. In a continuous plant, the dried and classified aggregate drops into a set of small bins which collects the aggregate and meters it through a set of feeder conveyors to another bucket elevator and into the mixer. Asphalt is metered through the inlet end of the mixer, and retention time is 10/86 Mineral Products Industry 8.1-1 890372 ti CO :a N SME _ wlwusl 10 a u!oSecondarynospl.ece r o-,mi.r.1.r. (O1lec tor_ • Utuna Iti-rw. JJ Droll Fon nO r.« .rwoa..wow. _ Primal Dust® n,..,as w.a... r 1-1 C0Ikctos \- -. -_ rr rot Screens S� n 111 vs t-r fines o` -• - -- -.—_r____--r---- in A Aggregate Relu sn f• 1 t �O ge Pile tine .-t - I1O1 Sins lid Mix z i '71 0A Cold�regale Bins i1 wee iOptlonal H } 1�x I r Loath' ° O _-� _moo 4 j �� ® Rotory Dryer l Storage __ _-----4\ Y.�L ]c I_ n _1 Coarse Aygrrya le _ -. 14 _!U age oC ii®Storage Pita Feoders el �^®®� 41:0 beater i=l — Figure 8.1-1. General process flow diagram for batch mix asphalt paving plants.%. $-- W o m a N . • r n 0 co U "-6110 Exhaust to r'e IMeb 1Ae. Sc[ordory Almosphie re • OP.W toe ern Collecto. O h..•••I9 &Pine.. O 3 Droll fon (location 7 0 cy..sver.a.u... j( Dependent Upon '1 _1" (rye of Secondary) or - I s 11:1 _ fine Aggregate Dale in i1tt' .- P. _ p Slocoge K Storage Pile hbt --- • -Silo p, Cold Aggieqote Dim u x n Screen n n n (Optional% C n 2® t re --. - Surge in -- L[>� gloudei —T� Mleer Din C> ` .fir /0 �bry I" i MI Bins p r, c /� -in ___\.e.]L Y C7 o r f kJ® 1{l l • Conveyor _ Cane Aggregjle l---flevolois--) Llteoter \--Asphalt Track Sloroge Pile Sloroge 1111 _. Figure 8.1-2. General process flow diagram for continuous mix asphalt paving plants. cc 7' L.) I, I I i I ill I I I • • controlled by an adjustable dam at the opposite end. The hot mix flows out of the mixer into a surge hopper, from which trucks are loaded. Drum Mix Plants - The drum mix process simplifies the conventional pro- cess by using proportioning feed controls in place of hot aggregate storage bins, vibrating screens and the mixer. Aggregate is introduced near the burner end of the revolving drum mixer, and the asphalt is injected midway along the drum. A variable flow asphalt pump is linked electronically to the aggregate belt scales to control mix specifications. The hot mix is dis- charged from the revolving drum mixer into surge bins or storage silos. Fig- ure 8.1-3 is a diagram of the drum mix process. Drum mix plants generally use parallel flow design for hot burner gases and aggregate flow. Parallel flow has the advantage of giving the mixture a longer time to coat and to collect dust in the mix, thereby reducing partic- ulate emissions. The amount of particulate generated within the dryer in this process is usually lower than that generated within conventional dryers, but because asphalt is heated to high temperatures for a long period of time, organic emissions (gaseous and liquid aerosol) are greater than in conven- tional plants. Recycle Processes - In recent years, recycling of old asphalt paving has been initiated in the asphaltic concrete industry. Recycling significantly reduces the amount of new (virgin) rock and asphaltic cement needed to repave an existing road. The various recycling techniques include both cold and hot methods, with the hot processing conducted at a central plant. In recycling, old asphalt pavement is broken up at a job site and is re- moved from the road base. This material is then transported to the plant, crushed and screened to the appropriate size for further processing. The paving material is then heated and mixed with new aggregate (if applicable), to which the proper amount of new asphaltic cement is added to produce a grade of hot asphalt paving suitable for laying. There are three methods which can be used to heat recycled asphalt pav- ing before the addition of the asphaltic cement: direct flame heating, in- direct flame heating, and superheated aggregate. Direct flame heating is typically performed with a drum mixer, wherein all materials are simultaneously mixed in the revolving drum. The first ex- perimental attempts at recycling used a standard drum mix plant and introduced the recycled paving and virgin aggregate concurrently at the burner end of the drum. Continuing problems with excessive blue smoke emissions led to several process modifications, such as the addition of heat shields and the use of split feeds. One method of recycling involves a drum mixer with a heat dispersion shield. The heat shield is installed around the burner, and additional cool- ing air is provided to reduce the hot gases to a temperature below 430 to 650°C (800 to 1200°F) , thus decreasing the amount of blue smoke. Although now considered obsolete, a drum within a drum design has also been successfully 8. 1-4 EMISSION FACTORS 10/86 899372 A C 0 co O Exhaust Fa Stock S Cl7 Dust Colkcla • 1 ; Droll Pon :.L Pira Aggregate �— �..+ o Storage Pile ro 0 n �/ F.. - _ — (Aegreoate Peed eire ® Ort 1 et to 0 O® \ \ 0r Exhaust n C. M G D 1 good-Tr-a tei re 1 "., ® (-9. Burnet Heated A _ J Drum Mixer cde Storage - _ vi Cony e yor re Coarse Aggregate aee[ro Lai° Stccoge Pile � Ism..,rot.., ilip /� v D.at.1 t.IJw. 1 p L«u Iwute'samba, 1 , Pump t9 /(�Yl�ryy ® ow,w.ttr.w.. .ruck Load-out Healed Asphalt Storage Tank Figure 8. 1-3. General process flow diagram for drum mix asphalt co paving plants. Ln I i I II 1 i I I i i i I f • • used for recycling. Reclaimed material is introduced into the outer drum through a separate charging chute while virgin material is introduced into the inner drum. Split feed drum mixers were first used for recycling in 1976 and are now the most popular design. At about the midpoint of the drum, the recycled bituminous material is introduced by a split feed arrangement and is heated by both the hot gases and heat transfer from the superheated virgi:z aggregate. Another type of direct flame method involves the use of a slinger conveyor to throw recycled material into the center of the drum mixer from the discharge end. In this process, the recycled material enters the drum along an arc, landing approximately at the asphalt injection point. Indirect flame heating has been performed with special drum mixers equipped with heat exchanger tubes. These tubes prevent the mixture of virgin aggregate and recycled paving from coming into direct contact with the flame and the associated high temperatures. Superheated aggregate can also be used to heat recycled bituminous material. In conventional plants, recycled paving can be introduced either into the pug mill or at the discharge end of the dryer, after which the tempera- ture of the material is raised by heat from the virgin aggregate. The proper amount of new asphaltic cement is they added to the virgin aggregate/recycle paving mixture to produce high grade asphaltic concrete. Tandem drum mixers can also be used to heat the recycle material. The first drum or aggregate dryer is used to superheat the virgin aggregate, and a second drum or dryer either heats recycled paving only or mixes and heats a [` combination of virgin and recycled material. Sufficient heat remains in the exhaust gas from the first dryer to heat the second unit also. 8. 1.2 Emissions and Controls Emission points at batch, continuous and drum mix asphalt plants dis- cussed below refer to Figures 8. 1-1, 8.1-2 and 8.1-3, respectively. Conventional Plants - As with most facilities in the mineral products industry, conventional asphaltic concrete plants have two major categories of emissions, those which are vented to the atmosphere through some type of stack, vent or pipe (ducted sources) , and those which are not confined to ducts and vents but are emitted directly from the source to the ambient air (fugitive sources) . Ducted emissions are usually collected and transported by an industrial ventilation system with one or more fans or air movers, eventually to be emitted to the atmosphere through some type of stack. Fugitive emissions result from process sources, which consist of a combina- tion of gaseous pollutants and particulate matter, or open dust sources. The most significant source of ducted emissions from conventional as- 4haltic concrete plants is the rotary dryer. The amount of aggregate dust carried out of the dryer by the moving gas stream depends upon a number of factors, including the gas velocity in the drum, the particle size distribution 8. i-6 EMISSION FACTORS 30/86 890372 • . of the aggregate, and the specific gravity and aerodynamic characteristics of r the particles. Dryer emissions also contain the fuel combustion products of (\ the burner. There may also be some ducted emissions from the heated asphalt storage tanks. These may consist of combustion products from the tank heater. The major source of process fugitives in asphalt plants is enclosures over the hot side conveying, classifying and mixing equipment which are vented into the primary dust collector along with the dryer gas. These vents and enclosures are commonly called a "fugitive air" or "scavenger" system. The scavenger system may or may not have its own separate air mover device, depending on the particular facility. The emissions captured and transported by the scavenger system are mostly aggregate dust, but they may also contain gaseous volatile organic compounds (VOC) and a fine aerosol of condensed liquid particles. This liquid aerosol is created by the condensation of gas into particles during cooling of organic vapors volatilized from the asphal- tic cement in the pug mill. The amount of liquid aerosol produced depends to a large extent on the temperature of the asphaltic cement and aggregate entering the pug mill. Organic vapor and its associated aerosol are also emitted directly to the atmosphere as process fugitives during truck loadout, from the bed of the truck itself during transport to the job site, and from the asphalt storage tank, which also may contain small amounts of polycyclic compounds. The choice of applicable control equipment for the drier exhaust and vent line ranges from dry mechanical collectors to scrubbers and fabric col- lectors. Attempts to apply electrostatic precipitators have met with little success. Practically all plants use primary dust collection equipment like large diameter cyclones, skimmers or settling chambers. These chambers are often used as classifiers to return collected material to the hot elevator and to combine it with the drier aggregate. Because of high pollutant levels, the primary collector effluent is ducted to a secondary collection device. Table 8. 1-1 presents total particulate emission factors for conventional asphaltic concrete plants, with the factors based on the type of control technology employed. Size specific emission factors for conventional asphalt plants, also based on the control of technology used, are shown in Table 8.1-2 and Figure 8. 1-4. Interpolations of size data other than those shown in Fig- ure 8. 1-4 can be made from the curves provided. There are also a number of open dust sources associated with conven- tional asphalt plants. These include vehicle traffic generating fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads, handling aggregate material, and similar operations. The number and type of fugitive emission sources associated with a particular plant depend on whether the equipment is portable or stationary and whether it is located adjacent to a gravel pit or quarry. Fugitive dust may range from 0. i micrometers to more than 300 micrometers in diameter. On the average, 5 percent of cold aggregate feed is less than 74 micrometers (minus 200 mesh) . Dust that may escape collection before primary control y generally consists of particulate having SO to 70 percent of the total mass being less than 74 micrometers. Uncontrolled particulate emission factors for various types of fugitive sources i.n conventional asphaltic concrete plants can be found in Section 11.2.3 of this document. 10/136 Mineral Products Industry 8. 1-7 890372 i i TABLE 8. 1-1. EMISSION FACTORS FOR TOTAL PARTICULATE FROM CONVENTIONAL ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANTS3 C Type of control Emission factor kg/Mg lb/ton Uncontrolledb,c 22.5 45.0 Precleanerc 7.5 15.0 High efficiency cyclone 0.85 1.7 Spray tower 0.20 0.4 Baffle spray tower 0. 15 0.3 Multiple centrifugal scrubberd 0.035 0.07 Orifice scrubber 0.02 0.04 Venturi scrubbere 0.02 0.04 Baghousef 0.01 0.02 aReferences 1-2, 5-10, 14-16. Expressed in terms of emissions per unit weight of asphaltic concrete pro- duced. Includes both batch mix and continuous mix bprocesses. Almost all plants have at least a precleaner follow- ing the rotary drier. cReference 16. These factors differ from those given in Table 8. 1-6 because they are for uncontrolled emissions and are from an earlier survey. Reference 15. Range of values = 0.004 - 0.0690 kg/Mg. Average from a properly designed, installed, operated • and maintained scrubber, based on a study to develop New Source Performance Standards. eReferences 14-15. Range of values = 0.013 - 0.0690 fkg/Mg. References 14-15. Emissions from a properly de- signed, installed, operated and maintained bag- house, based on a study to develop New Source Per- formance Standards. Range of values = 0.008 - 0,018 kg/Mg. 8.1-8 EMISSION FACTORS 10/86 890372 iv N Co 0' TABLE 8. 1-2. SUMMARY OF SIZE SPECIFIC EMISSION FACTORS FOR CONVENTIONAL ASPHALT PLANTSa EMISSION FACTOR RATING: 1) Cumulative Rattle il mission factor S stated sire' _..._ _,____.Cumulative mass 5 stated size iL!— _._____,_____ — 1lulttple • Particle Multiple Onvlty Cyclone Gravity taghoused sixth (yclont centeifupl spray 5aghosse Uncontrolled _ collecto_n scsubbtu iw�raterp_ collector (Iank1 Uncontrolled coltectocs scrubbers towers collector 6g1Ug Ib/1oo 6t/N2 Ib/ton $8/112 lb/tot i8/8t lb/leo [t/Mp 16/ton Y-- D 2.5 pork 0.0 5.0 67 21 31 0.19 0.17 0.054 0.104 0.023 0.046 0.041 0.082 0.001 0.006 p 5.0 v.A 3.5 11 14 27 16 0.78 1.6 0.13 0.26 0.026 0.052 0,053 0.11 0.004 0.001 r 10.0 limn 14 21 83 37 40 1.1 6.1 0.18 0.36 0.028 0.056 0.073 0.15 0.004 0.008 111 il O 15.0 pm* 21 29 83 39 41 5.3 11 0.25 0.50 0.029 0.058 0.076 0.16 0.005 0.010 c. C 20.0 lsnA 30 36 64 41 54 6.8 14 0.30 0.60 0.010 0.060 0.011 0.16 0.005 0.010 n m Total mats emission factor 23 45 0.15 1.1 0.035 0.010 0.20 0.40 0.01 0.02 p. °Reference 13, Table 3-16. Rounded to two significant figures. C Aecodytimic diameter. fl raised on emission factors for total part l col ale shove to Table it.I.I. Tapresied Is teens of eat is loos pee unit weight of asphaltic roorrett produced. n a . 106 ti too = 2,000 lb. `G dPounded to one s gal lirant figure. 0 g�irdyE,/ OD Q a I i f • • 10.0 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 111 I inn 10.0 c _ /1." _ ,.o 1.0 E t14 /51 N 3 0.1l_ �� 0.1 W C O W _ O a i 7 u 0.01 O.Ot _m r I1. 8aghouses I 2, Centrifugal 5mA:oen O 1 3. Spray Towers r— 5. CyclonesS. Uncontrolled 0001 I I ' : III I I I 11111 I I 111111 0.001 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 Aerodynamic Particle 0lameter(F(.mA) Figure 8.1-4. Size specific emission factors for conventional asphalt plants. e 8. 1-10 EMISSION FACTORS 10/86 890372 • Drum Mix Plants - As with the other two asphaltic concrete production processes, the most significant ducted source of particulate emissions is the C drum mixer itself. Emissions from the drum mixer consist of a gas stream with a substantial amount of particulate matter and lesser amounts of gaseous VOC of various species. The solid particulate generally consists of fine aggre- gate particles entrained in the flowing gas stream during the drying process. The organic compounds, on the other hand, result from heating and mixing of asphalt cement inside the drum, which volatilizes certain Components of the asphalt. Once the VOC have sufficiently cooled, some condense to form the fine liquid aerosol (particulate) or "blue smoke" plume typical of drum mix asphalt plants. A number of process modifications have been introduced in the newer plants to reduce or eliminate the blue smoke problem, including installation of flame shields, rearrangement of the flights inside the drum, adjustments in the asphalt injection point, and other design changes. Such modifications result in significant improvements is the elimination of blue smoke. Emissions from the drum mix recycle process are similar to emissions from regular drum mix plants, except that there are more volatile organics because of the direct flame volatilization of petroleum derivatives contained in the old asphalt paving. Control of liquid organic emissions in the drum mix re- cycle process is through some type of process modification, as described above. Table 8.1-3 provider, total particulate emission factors for ducted emis- sions in drum mix asphaltic concrete plants, with available size specific emis- sion factors shown in Table 8.1-4 and Figure 8. 1-5. CTABLE 8. 1-3. TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSION FACTORS FOR DRUM MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANTS EMISSION FACTOR RATING: B Type of control Emission factor kg/Mg lb/ton Uncontrolled 2.45 4.9 Cyclone or multiclone b 0.34 0.67 Low energy wet scrubber 0.04 0.07 Venturi scrubber 0.02 0.04 aReference 11. Expressed in terms of emissions per unit weight of asphaltic concrete produced. These factors differ from those for conventional asphaltic concrete plants because the aggregate contacts and is coated with asphalt early in the drum mix pro- bcess. Either stack sprays, with water droplets injected into the exit stack, or a dynamic scrubber with a wet fan. 10/86 Mineral Products Industry 8. 1-11 890372 r TABLE 8.1-4. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION AND SIZE SPECIFIC EMISSION FACTORS FOR \ \ DRUM MIX ASPHALT PLANTS CONTROLLED BY A BAGHOUSE COLLECTORa EMISSION FACTOR RATING: D Cumulative particulate emission factors Cumulative mass 5 stated S stated size Particle size size (X) Uncontrolledd Controllede (umA)b Uncontrolled Controlledf kR/MR lb/ton 10-3 kR/MR 10-3 lb/ton 2.5 5.5 11 0.14 0.27 0.53 1. 1 10.0 23 32 0.57 1.1 1.6 3.2 15.0 27 35 0.65 1.3 1.7 3.5 Total mass emission factor 2.5 4.9 4.9 9.8 Condensable organicsg 3.9 7.7 bReference 23, Table 3-35. Rounded to two significant figures. Aerodynamic diameter. cExpressed in terms of emissions per unit weight of asphaltic concrete produced. Not dgenerally applicable to recycle processes. °Based on an uncontrolled emission factor of 2.45 kg/Mg (see Table 8.1-3). Reference 23. Calculated using an overall collection efficiency of 99.8% for a fbaghouse applied to an uncontrolled emission factor of 2.45 kg/Mg. Includes data from two out of eight tests where - 30% recycled asphalt paving was processed using a split feed process. gDetermined at outlet of a baghouse collector while plant was operating with - 30% recycled asphalt paving. Factors are applicable only to a direct flame heating process with a split feed. C 8.1-12 EMISSION FACTORS 10/86 890372 / • • C 5 , . r 1 1 , 1 , 4 I i I I I I I I „ 1.o r . .. - - / - / _ I - I U • I y 100.0 _ - 0.1 -if 11 2 - M N N v ` - I O ..°... Y e .wC / - a 9:r; N N .0... /6 N ae 10.0 / '- u it 0.0t X v / _T E W C e _ r 1 .3 1.0 H 10.001 '5 -4 U - Unconrrol led / 1 e Bophovse 1 I „1 r I I 0.1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r r r 1 I r 1 r r. i 0. 1 0.7 1.0 10.0 100.0 Aerodynomic Particle 01ameter (µmA) Figure 8.1-5. Particle size distribution and size specific emission factors for dray mix asphaltic concrete plants. 10/86 Mineral Products Industry 8.1-13 890372 r • s Interpolations of the data shown in Figure 8. 1-5 to particle sizes other than those indicated can be made from the curves provided. Process fugitive emissions normally associated with batch and continuous {\ plants from the hot side screens, bins, elevators and pug mill have been eliminated in the drum mix process. There may be, however, a certain amount of fugitive VOC and liquid aerosol produced from transport and handling of hot mix from the drum mixer to the storage silo, if an open conveyor is used, and also from the beds of trucks. The open dust sources associated with drum mix plants are similar to those of batch or continuous plants, with regard to truck traffic and aggregate handling operations. 8.1.3 Representative Facility Factors for various materials emitted from the stack of a typical asphaltic concrete plant are given in Table 8.1-5, and the characteristics of such a plant are shown in Table 8.1-6. With the exception of aldehydes, the materials listed in Table 8.1-6 are also emitted from the mixer, but in con- centrations 5 to 100 fold smaller than stack gas concentrations, and they last only during the discharge of the mixer. Reference 16 reports mixer emissions of SO , NO , and VOC as "less than" values, so it is possible they may not be present at all. Particulates, carbon monoxide, polycyclics, trace metals and hydrogen sulfide were observed at concentrations that were small relative to stack amounts. Emissions from the mixer are' thus best treated as fugitive. All emission factors for the typical facility are for control`;ed opera- tion and are based either on average industry practice shown by survey or on results of actual testing in a selected typical plant. Aa industrial survey16 showed that over 66 percent of operating hot mix asphalt plants use fuel oil for combustion. Possible sulfur oxide emissions from the stack were calculated, assuming that all sulfur in the fuel oil is oxidized to SO . The amount of sulfur oxides actually released through the stack may be attenuated by water scrubbers, or even by the aggregate itself, if limestone is being dried. Number 2 fuel oil has an average sulfur content of 0.22 weight percent. Emission factors for nitrogen oxides, nonmethane volatile organics, car- bon monoxide, polycyclic organic material, and aldehydes were determined by sampling stack gas at the representative asphalt hot mix plant. 8. 1-14 EMISSION FACTORS 10/6 890372 gi EXHIBIT • i ` / IC TABLE 8.1-5. EMISSION FACTORS FOR SELECTED GASEOUS POLLUTANTS FROM A CONVENTIONAL ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANT STACK? • )P yt b Emission `� Material emitted Factor Emission factor l D) Y Rating g/Mg lb/ton 0 Sulfur oxides (as SO2)d,e C 1468 0.292S i /'deill . Nitrogen oxides (as NO2)f D 18 0.036 1X ! Y �T,� Volatile organic compounds D 14 0.028 Carbon monoxidcf D 19 0.038 Polycyclic organic material£ D 0.013 0.000026 Aldehydesf D 10 0.02 ( Formaldehyde D 0.075 0.00015 2-Methylpropaaal (isobutyraldehyde) 0 0.65 0.0013 1-Butanal (n-butyraldehyde) D 1.2 0.0024 3-Methylbutanal (isovaleraldehyde) D 8.0 0.016 bReference 16. Particulates, carbon monoxide, polycyclics, trace metals and hydrogen sulfide were observed is the mixer emissions at con- centrations that were small relative to stack concentrations. dExpressed as g/Mg and lb/ton of asphaltic concrete produced. Mean source test results of a 400 plant survey. eReference 21. $ = % sulfur in fuel. SO2 may be attenuated f50°4 by adsorption on alkaline aggregate. Based on limited test data from the single asphaltic concrete plant described in Table 8. 1-6. 10/86 Mineral Products Industry 8.1-15 890372 , • r • • . TABLE 8.1-6. CHARACTERISTICS OF A REPRESENTATIVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PLANT SELECTED FOR SAMPLINGa Parameter Plant sampled Plant type Conventional, permanent, batch plant Production rate, Mg/hr (tons/hr) 160.3 t 16% (177 t 16%) Mixer capacity, Mg (tons) 3.6 (4.0) Primary collector Cyclone Secondary collector Wet scrubber (venturi) Fuel Oil Release agent Fuel oil Stack height, m (ft) 15.85 (52) aReference 16, Table 16. References for Section 8. 1 1. Asphaltic Concrete Plants Atmospheric Emissions Study, EPA Contract No. {` 68-02-0076, Valentine, Fisher, and Tomlinson, Seattle, WA, November 1971. 2. Guide for Air Pollution Control of Hot Mix Asphalt Plants, Information Series 17, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Riverdale, MD, 1965. 3. R. M. Ingels, et al. , "Control of Asphaltic Concrete Batching Plants in Los Angeles County", Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 10(1):29-33, January 1960. 4. H. E. Friedrich, "Air Pollution Control Practices and Criteria for Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Batch Plants", Journal of the /di:. Pollution Control Association, 19(12):924-928, December 1969. 5. Air Pollution Engineering Manual, AP-40, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1973. Out of Print. 6. G. L. Allen, et al. , "Control of Metallurgical and Mineral Dust and Fumes in Los Angeles County, California", Information Circular 7627, U. S. De- partment of Interior, Washington, DC, April 1952. C 8. 1-16 EMISSION FACTORS 10/86 890372 • LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET DATE: March 14, 1989 NAME: Phillip Camenisch - CASE NUMBER: USR-874 ADDRESS: 10504 Weld County Road 7, Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation, material processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The SW} and the W} of the SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado - LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, south of State Highway 119 and east of and - adjacent to Weld County Road 7 SIZE OF PARCEL: 200 Acres, more or less 1 - POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM THE APPLICATION MATERIALS: - The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 24.3 and 44 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received specific recommendations from the State of Colorado Department of Health, Office of the State Engineer Division of Water Resources, Weld County Engineering Department, City of Longmont, Weld County Health Department, r.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company, Central Weld County Water Conservancy District, and Tri-Area Planning Commission. Copies of these responses are included in this summary packet. The Department of Planning Service's staff has received one objection from a surrounding property - owner. - 890372 i • . •, r. .. E I . 0 It 25 to I a• 4 U. c1 Y( ç : Y °• /1 vp •--.-77‘... .?:•t•-•Lie. ? I" .....h •• F ' ' :•L,:' .t i -"-- -g• Ar:: 34 /\ .;: .6; •.c,o I :I �" A'1 •• �� p • / �� m r p _ rt 11 �• " r ' p� ��`�' / F. F• C..•. • : . :- • L-, f Lr" -1 : ••r r 1t . `• •r _ 11 ' 30 • mar•,Y, F_ • Y • • . • \I •p• 40 p p •r t N `u. iZ Npw .•r -4 .L r r p � F rSie^ } q-,e • °"I e. �/,..1: • rr�—L r,• .•• rs ,• , F: Sd,gern �) a r' r • •I. N , w7314 • , ,� � , •� 1 �--/1 .,wan...rrrF,/••.."�• . I • a �_H . e, •K ilt L I \ • ,\ • • r• T �`\ a /1 Y to ssurr pAEC Sjut F• til v--0.-\' •L \ VV L,. S�alC A£C� �N •/A I, I'dal 0. . . et. V" .4. ICq�'�]p ^-• ., r. , • ' ---y Q y''I�\" ',, • 24 'arm- 1; ▪ • I ... a ). • I r [1KMMR[4 •• - If p ,...-v,. . \ I ,• • _.M �e` --4 MIµ tr. (4 4.7•4\ L I",r •• N•. .[ � ( .. I.e •nom trifle,: ' a i•• 41 mss) . '�• '�, • s“'r• • . � • p �. • ' r II • ro :, � n .1 N / jJ • r I.1 I .(\/'. -w -- • � O' • I rl -� - , ,-a,� �•�•..�ctic�-,-�.t 'L•1 1l 16 Ate. , �• • P M• .F'• 1� � � ,Is; - N •• •• M [n _ • W� P I N „ .F C„ tl , N , / I ' \ • n F, • �f 'i • p••' :• 4. .t:'f .cou �r -t, J' ' ' ,' l "tl ,ucr •• ..N\ • ••,1 -.CC 4 4 'Li12 ... , 1 w_-" ' ____ • _ _,.._ \ • f l X\-- --; ' ' 1 gPipa- sic 6 • yr-) g tSI I f�. II t ai -...,_ I,: ....., + 2 rg "It c.c.,: !:,r 1 1 / c,....7,_. , __I...) , . . i a 11.-1 N. - I „ C 1:4.- .,J, ! 9 •Y p // •C r 4 C.4 ,-% • ; ti r P , ..�7- 11,•3.. / F•li•ll •r...••• �n•'� JI:. . • C -,4O /.L /#i:.•. .—• Ay IIis'1,,l_ .i•j V (�) 1 • -4 6 O ' a. 1 r. tF '. .4•• .• de I,. / C'r• yF it ,• F 1�IjI� 'tit �'`J1}<. 4 i� ▪ n 1 • i • Ii., . Y It: ' off H h Oki y a, 1 �> •11- - Lam%,/ - - r,. F f • ▪ \.. I» 1/ • ,. No' qq ,! N n i I. J n • � '•2 . i J v I Y]r,.tv�'A ��•' &45E•NI i rF � / `Jrf U 1 N 1 N 7M p e�'? 1kr11 .,•.° i•� N sa R' i ��10 (`. -�, �• . . N I� I 1:0 8903]l IFI .1: •I �;h \ 'o N. • - -- .~- fir _ // ,\ 36 N s A \\ / 7 am \�N& h is �, 51 4.900 - \'� � i %482 _ ^ - ' J � '1 / 7c..\,,,....--`550.' �o / s `,f'"-\\ --lU I _ /� J il 4' y 3 r '— e C4843, - - /1 ;//` 39�'\ — II r.\-- r. ,Iill I ,!+ Gravel Pit ` ITG'. II I `\ 0 \ c4850- 1 / ' L y//�J� I r - 14649 ® vr� � • JI Y• • X9131., •B.WII o I I I i 1/4 1 'to �'�/ pp o �'\ 4850 fai, . % /- -- `` rJ oar _.„---..,1Y \-• 31.0858 ... / "I Z� // / 12 9 - �S" - I 00 I 11 'A 1 _,,,_ :_/ it r 0 ' - -.l �ti i� ' Flume _� / ,/ , 7 �� r c 1 , v, t . • ``- Cam_ 0 f I .Rine iTh \\_.2)— ! • I ,151.r:X 15 • \ 14� ! l : y rI W.. C:---'--.._4880.- A .� �� l ) \ _ OM!- NM I‘ 'r 1 1 • .eerr.. ,5482 91 20 I !) 2 .� \--�• I n , // ' tit 1 voo \ . , �� 89 3 -2 1,....- ai� m 1, I.� \ //'Il if Seh.. I 2 . .. H { �1 .y. m' 1 —cc" .fie 1p ,-'•' _....-' 1. •. i— y t` ., . V /ably Y �V/ rid. �• •P W^ ,.� !• i -.tea `2• .r 1,11310 a ei` sGe Air /V /3�/� i • fOy�t11 Q. . ' 1 •1. ....Y+,: . / Del `� " '" ...'.1 , -Tia�{ 1 I ♦V WP '-0745, _. . . .—t":1/4\--:'''''''..C7-\.' .. a • .r• .. t.7r ' Mc rte _ � i G/.- M f A U6 R- 874 09e sz • / • At a, �;r C7 8903 72 ^, � �G6 t2'may+ 0 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: USR-874 DATE OF INSPECTION: February 14, 1989 NAME: Phillip Camenisch REQUEST: A site specific development plan and a special review permit for an open pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The SW} and part of the W} SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 7. LAND USE: N Mining operation E Frmland, Del Camino Area, 1-25 S Farmland W Weld County Road 7, farmland, mining operation ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E C-3 (Commercial) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: On the proposed site are two single family homes, a dairy operation. two active oil wells with a tank battery attached. and what appears to be an inoperable or abandoned well. The property is enclosed by barbed wire and fencing. The topography of the property is flat. Drainage appears to be in a northerly direction. Idaho Creek and the Rural Ditch both traverse the property and flow in a south to north direction. Irrigation ditches abut the north, south, east, and west property lines. The closest residence abuts the SW} SW} of this property, and is located adjacent to the agricultural access serving the site. Bys- - e nt Pla net 890372 • . . FIELD CHECK J � �i Filing Number: BSR-874 Date of Inspection: cry (/) GO ?? / Applicant's Name: Phillip Camenisch Request: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. Legal Description: SW} and the E} SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately 3 miles northwest of the Town of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, south of State Highway 119 and east of Weld County Road 7. (r13-, ` Land Use: N AG v - l c� 1 -1—,, ,.—ct L ( ; S . r,-P 1 \ p E Ar? ,_ : C' CA 1:�u ira (.. l 1V r'1 el n le- A :fir, mac:.-'1 S r r, c (n. L't-� rnL / ;_>)_s tart 1 W !'t (.1 v--,e- (.. LTt.. i�e l- ( TJ-,c.(u t -..c Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E C-3 (Commercial) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: Ara.--v-f")•7- \ Nfr3,_,; n1 Qv( 7 -t`1. 4 . 4-t'IN r 1 r,sT t.,C1_I�i C F' .-."'C •, i,. %o I- S Ti.., ',; r •./C.Iti (4/t' ✓Tti ^. ---1 1 C l� t-Ar9r ��//_' ri ^pis ‘-, `1 L4, V1 vv-'1 L &fi c ( ( 'e) —tie -- n A c„ F,,-, -t-l..Q ,'v v•--t In I. 16-cl: L i J signature of Hoar Member 890372 ` �. REFERRAL LIST SAD NMI NAME: Phillip Camenisch CASE NUMBER: USR-874 REFERRALS SENT: February 3, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: February 21, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney _Ault X Health Department _Brighton Extension Service _Dacono ✓ X Emergency Management Office _Eaton Sheriff's Office _Erie X Engineering Evans Housing Authority _Firestone -- --Airport Authority Fort Lupton _Building Inspection _Frederick ____Garden City STATE Gilcrest X Division of Water Resources , 11471s.2 Greelcy Geological Survey YGrover ✓ X Department of Health Hudson , %~Highway Department Johnstown Historical Society ----_Keenesburg Water Conservation Board Kersey X Mined Land Reclamation Bureau i ----La Salle ----Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS ✓ X Longmont Ault F-1 Mead _ _Berthoud F-2 _Milliken +_Brighton F-3 New Raymer _Dacono F-19 _Nunn _Eaton F-4 _Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance —Galeton F-6 Windsor ----Hudson F-7 Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES _ La Salle F-9 ____Adams / X Longmont F-10 ____Boulder Milliken F-11 ____Larimer ----Nunn F-12 ----Pawnee Platteville 1-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES _ _Platte Valley F-14 ✓ X US Army Corp of Engineers Poudre Valley F-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Raymer _Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commission _ Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills 7-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton OTHER Fort Collins ✓ X Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley / X Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. ✓ X Longmont I X Tri-Area Planning Commission ----West Adams X Division of Wildlife ' COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Rural Ditch Company . v X Ivan Gosnell 890372 • STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH dvv^"o(0*'4210 East 11th Avenue tr 8i. Denver, Colorado 80220 1iry,yra Phone (303) 320.8333 •\w.�xE'�� 1 r leis• 1 Roy Romer Governor March 6, 1989 JNI 19: '„ Thomas M.Vernon, M.D. �f ��.�; 'r'�••f�`� Executive Director 2 Il . Ir 11 nn 1nr(1 f IMr, Brian J. Single � I �Qrt r7p/ !,j Department of Planning Services �ILLiI'I Weld County 915 10th Avenue WC(A CO. P18Mt0f t;omwj boy Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Proposed Development Plan and Special r ,. Reviews Permit Submitted by Phillip Camenisck (Case Number USR-874 ) Dear Brian: The staff of the Engineering Permit group in the Division has reviewed the above mentioned application and would like to offer the following comments. . 1 ) The operation will need to obtain an emissions control permit from the Air Pollution Control Division (Division). This appears to a fairly large scale I ` proposal and may have to go through a public comment period under the Division's permit processing procedures. A copy of the general information and schedule of permit processing time is enclosed. 2) The proposed equipment will be subject to New Source , Performance Standards which are incorporated Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (Commission) Regulation No. 6. In particular the provisions relating to non-mettalic mineral processing operation and hot-mix asphalt batch plants. A copy of the regulation can be obtained by contacting the Commission office at 331-8596. I hope these comments are useful and if you have any further questions regarding emission permit requirements please contact Jim Geier, chief of the Permit Engineering Group . S" erely, le Ray hr, Senior Planner RM:blh enclosure cc: Wes Potter, Weld County Health Dept. 89®372 Jim Geier, APCD oeco� • 9 ROY ROMER phew �� JERIS A.DANIELSON Governor * r1 *; State Engineer --„mov:** '/876 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 February 22, 1989 Mr. Brian J. Bingle Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Camenisch Site Plan, USR-874 W1/2 SE1/4, Sec. 10, T2N, R68W and SW1/4, Sec. 10, T2N, R68W Dear Mr. Bingle: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to allow a gravel mining operation on a 240-acre tract. A large ground water lake will be created by the mining. The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that evaporation of ground water is considered a beneficial use and, therefore, a well permit is required prior to excavation creating the lake surface. Since the lake is located in on over-appropriated area, the well permit could not be issued without an augmentation plan approved in the Water Court or temporary substitute water supply plan approved by the State Engineer. No information concerning such plans was submitted to our office. The application states that the Left Hand Water Company will supply domestic water to the operation. It does not discuss a source of industrial water for washing, dust suppression, etc. We cannot recommend approval of this application until the above issues are addressed. The applicant should be informed that if he exposes ground water to evaporation or makes other beneficial uses of ground water without a valid well permit, we will issue a cease and desist order. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Deputy State Engineer HDS/JCM:0598I cc: Alan Berryman, Division Engineer Steve Lautenschlager FEB 2 7 1989 11 U 8903'72 wells co. obitaIox sumucrsac • • (yam MEMORAf1DUM tot, ,, To Brian Bingle, Planning _ oHe ,_February 22, 1989 COLORADO ,,m Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer Sabnj Phillip Camenisch, USR-874 Subject The application materials and mining plan map indicate the entrance to the pit area, possible future batch plant site, and material stockpile area to be located at the southwest corner of the property. Because there are residences located near this area, I recommend these facilities be relocated to the center of the site, If they were located between Phase I and Phase II, mining could begin at the far southern boundary of the site and proceed to the north with no loss of material. The application materials do not adequately address hauling. I recommend a haul route be identified from the entrance of the site north to Colorado State Highway 119. Hauling should be restricted to that stretch of road to minimize traffic disturbance in the area, and isolate the area in which trucks will cause damage. A Road Maintenance Agreement between the applicant and the Board of Weld County Commissioners should be required. There are several gravel operators in the area who have similar agreements. Basically, the permittee is responsible for repairs and/or reconstruction to roads on his haul route. FEB 2 3 1989 !j i DLS/mw:prpc 8216 Co. &usl% w waae:� xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Phillip Camenisch, USR-874 890372 4;e Iglitkit DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 651-8330 ie°Z OR A February 16, 1989 Mr. Brian J. Single, Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Sery i .s, 915 10th Street FFR 2 1 1989 Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number USR-874 Wale Ca. rtannnie bnmu,i . satin. Dear Brian: Thank you for sending for our review an application from Phillip Camenisch for a site specific development plan and a special review permit for an open- pit sand and gravel mining operation and an asphalt and/or concrete batch plant. The mining operation is proposed on a 240 acre site in the Del Camino area east of Weld County Road 7 and about one-half mile south of State Highway 119. The eastern boundary of the proposed permit area is approximately one- quarter mile west of 1-25. The application indicates that five mining phases are proposed: each taking between three to four years to complete. Therefore, the miring operation will take between fifteen to twenty years to complete. The City of Longmont would like to raise several issues which we respectfully request Weld County consider in its deliberations. First, the application indicates that an air emissions permit application will be submitted to the Colorado Department of Health. The City is concerned about its air quality: specifically particulates. We trust that either through the State's and/or County's permitting processes, effective measures will be required to control fugitive dust during all stages of this mining operation. The second area of concern relates to the truck traffic. The application materials indicate that there will be 100 trips per day, and that truck traffic will use Weld County Road 7 north to State Highway 119 or south to State Highway 52. The City understands that during this permitting process the intersection of State Highway 119/Weld County Road 7 will be reviewed to determine if the turning movements of these trucks will require any modifications to this intersection. The application materials appear to be silent on the location of piles of overburden or the use of buffers between the proposed mine and surrounding development. There is an existing trailer park to the northeast. While the property to the east is vacant currently, it is a highly visible parcel (from 1-25) within the I-25 mixed use development area. It is quite possible that this 8(� yep 903"7 2 parcel may be partially developed when mining occurs on the eastern most portion of the site, i.e. , Phase IV in twelve to sixteen years. You may wish to explore the idea of buffers further with the applicant. The strategic location of piles of overburden may contribute to buffering. Another thought is to explore the possibility of mining the easternmost portion of the site earlier than in Phase IV. As a result, the reclaimed area east of the Rural Ditch would be more established as urban-level development occurs along 1-25, and any impacts of mining on this urbanizing area would decrease rather than increase over time. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please call either Froda Greenberg or me at 651-3330. Sincerely, Wildeint Marta Bromschwig, AICP Planning Director xc: Phil Del Vecchio, Community Development Director File #2050-38 mb/mm • 990:119" MDEPAR•S OF PLANNING SERVICES t 4 s t a t PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.44Q0 . '-;,, I4t1 015,0th STREET illres 1 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 o ' i t, cil' e CASE NUMBER USR-C74 • COLORADO February 3, 19E9 TO WNC IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application. from Phillip Camerisch for a Site Specific lievelopment Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and au asphalt and concrete batch plant. The parcel of land is described as the SW} and the WI SFx of Section 10, T2N, F€8W of the 6th P.M. , Weld Count;;, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 3 tiles northwest of Firestone; wect of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, south of State 'tlighway 119 and east of Weld County Road 7. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Lnv comments or recommendation yet consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply t,ill help to facilitate the processing of • the proposal and will enure prompt consideration of your recommendation.. rle:ase reply by February_ 21,_1.989, so that we ray give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Cvrrnet Planner, if you have any questions about this referral . Thank you for your help and cooceretion in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return: to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and fine that the request ___ (does/does rot) comply with our Corprehensive Plan for the tollowing reasons. -- w - • -n Svaj , rn ,;—i` --- - _--- I 012. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we foe] this request • o '.:1 (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our : ,o �i town for the following reasons: _._. . cr. • 0 ti a.S-2 i --__-- - .` L 3. / Le hove• reviewed the proposal and find re conflicts with our interestol Vrovided elliandr1c, r ec.-fe w 4h.q kill loud Ihn;4-s. 4, i fcrmal recommendation 1r under consideration and will be submitted to -cu prior to:_ _--_.- _ 5 Please refer! to the enclosed letter. _ Sibr�ed: Lc-' 4a-07L- --Agency:e%-tic- ?�LJ .( x7 . if a^ t ZA(o/ci9 /e' 8903n cc : *Rite : Jaccbs,n vIct Grier • • fjf t I1lEITlORAf DUM FFR r, 198971f OM I;,, „(._.,_.: .�L:.u\ T. Weld County Planning Date February 25, 1989 COLORADO From Environmental Protection Services gull GCANyLe ?L Case Number: USR-874 Name: Camenisch, Phillip Subject: Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. All liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. Required Emissions Permit is obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Deportment of Health for fugitive dust and odors. 3. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 4. The septic system(s) for the proposed office is/are required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 5. An ISDS Evaluation on all existing septic systems will be necessary prior to issuing the required septic permits on the existing systems. 6. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 7. Fugitive dust must be confined on this site and a dust abatement and control plan must be submitted and approved by this department. 8. Required NPDES Permit shall be obtained from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Health, and/or amended if appropriate for the increased operation. 9. Maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial limit of 70db(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statues. 10. The Division requires that this facility provide restrooms and/or vaulted toilets. Portable toilets are not acceptable under the Weld County Regulations. EPS/dgc 890372 III • • NT Os. a`".40,"M�.'4.6 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY e ; .% I. OMAHA DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS all& 1`.I I r. 6014 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE OMAHA, NEBRASKA 06102 ncri:e TO ATT[NTION 01 February 9, 1989 Platte River Resident Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 9307 State Highway 121 Littleton, Colorado 80123-6901 Brian J. Bingle Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Bingle: Reference is made to Case Number USR-874 which concerns a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for an open-pit mining operation and asphalt and concrete batch plant proposed by Phillip Camenisch which will require the channelization of Idaho Creek located in the SE 1 of Section 10, T-2-N, R-68-W, Weld County, Colorado. During a February 7, 1989 site visit conducted by me, it was found that wetlands exist on this parcel of land. See attached map showing the approximate location of wetland areas within noted regions. After the snow melts and earlier this Spring, it will be necessary to do a wetland determination of this area. Please find the enclosed list of Environmental Ccnsultants whc may assist in wetland delinations. As you know, the United State Army Corps of Engineers has regulatory jurisdiction over waters of the United States which include adjacent and isolated wetlands, pursuant to the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33USC 1344). Under this Act, prior authorization is required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged fill or fill material riverward of the ordinary high water mark of waters of the United States and into the Wetlands. This Regulatory jurisdiction is administered under Federal Regulation 33 CFR 320-330. 890372 Brian J. Single Page 2 After the wetland delination has been completed and approved by this office, please find enclosed Department of the Army (DA) permit application materials which should be completed and sent to the Omaha District Office listed on the back cover of the application information pamphlet. Also, with your application, you may want to send any wetland mitigation plan you have. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or call Terry McKee at 303/979-4120 or 4121. Sincerely, 313n,` t\{sty.. Terry McKee Environmental Resource Specialist Enclosures cf; Omaha Permits Branch Permit Files 890372 THIS LIST IS • CFLED TO ENDORSE ANY SPECK C•..TANT • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS • DAVID JOIDISON Western Resource Development RICHARD C. BARTN 711 Walnut Street Boulder, Colorado 80302 Soil-Plant Systems (303) 449-9009 5920 McIntyre Street Boulder, Colorado 80302 DEBORAH REMQCER (303) 279-2585 Stoeeken-Keammecr & Associates CARY D. BEERS, Ph D. Ecological Consultants 5858 Pox & Associates of Colorado, Inc. er, Colora Hollow Road 4765 Independence Street Boulder, Colorado 80301 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 (303) 530-1783 (303) 424-5578 ERIC OLGEIRSON JANE BUNIN, PhD. 305 Emerson Street Natural Science Associates Denver, Colorado 80218 (303) 733-8121 3010 Regis Avenue Boulder, Colorado 80303 i,AURANNE RINK (303) 499-5014 Aquatic & Wetlands Consultants DAVID COOPER Walnut Eleven Building 1911 - 11th Street Department of Environmental Sciences Colorado School of Mines Suite 301 Golden, Colorado 80401 Boulder, Colorado 80302 (303) 499-6411 (Home) (303) 442-5770 JEPPEREY L. DAWSON RANDY SCDROEDER Project Scientist Greystonc Development Consultants 7308 South Alton Way Woodward-Clyde Consultants Stanford Place 3, Suite 1000 Suite K 4852 So. Ulster St. Parkway Englewood, Colorado 80112 (303) 850-0930 Denver, Colorado 80237 303) 694-2770 PETER SMITH Telex 501285 (Woodward DVR) Stoneman Landers, Inc. 3932 W. 97th Place STEVE DOUGHERTY Westminster, Colorado 80030 1740 High Street (303) 466-9694 Denver, Colorado 80218 MICIIAE,. J. TOPA (303) 320-4400 Tupa Associates, Inc. SCOTT ELLIS 12487 E. Amherst Cr. Environmental Research & Technology Aurora, Colorado 80014 1716 Heath Parkway (303) 755-6315 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 STEVE VIERT & (303) 493-8878 STEPHEN G. LONG Cedar Creek Associates LOREN HETTINGER 916 Willshire Avenue D P.O. Box 9558 Dames & Moore 1625 Cole Boulevard Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Golden, Colorado 80401 (303) 493-4394 Home: 493-1893 (303) 232-6262 890372 a IiSstvx�x r s3.an ..M2*Weire2TiT -nar, �:3V z^5=: .n... - S.l r ""'='Ci..- `" a,-.'S7:.:c&1S v.•_'"� rc r=.+.-.y..ti 'F�- 3x, 21,10-SLMri,Fri z'fe.'F:S'tn,�'- CY.13la.S`3E 3.:��=•Y I SILVERS, I37LLFAM L.8 SHIRLEY ! LARSON, t 11 , 16608 WELD CO_ RR 7 1 DOROTHY E. I piterraln Elerlre e1:1;;;-(.,s I 7.;;avia; Ernpira Ua5.yn(e,s :dC<.S ' 13 LO.NGMONT, CO. 88050! 110766 WELD COI ?e CaX W J.o PO ect 3 , 3O r)( f IAAu I1 40. 7 Th;t,h4eK,C•h, Sfors c ,ve . PIER 1 BOUNDARY I Lcr.Gr .ir,eo. I �oez r:,�rnFeA,co16.4oa33 I =6501 I KRISATIo Y4017CHH r42,r..;,_,„% fhg-i��..,,.-.-,,.:{j caaa.. _ _ a zn+.-.��z<..sceacs-ss.�a�.ti<.�c.,i-.r-_‘..-.-a-� I.. :o,. ,..��:�L.c..+.�4:..<..=..c .ac' .,-.- -�. t . _._____-".- r . _ . I J _. . . -__ - -__ . 1 - - J y —RUR: �FOrrER Ll /7 /�/r/ � �� •3-1.��i f, [1 j �f.,t•> '', tiP ii �� 35Sb �>` .� ; LONC ) , ((( /i - J 1 1 i j /' Jc / (fI �/ 44 DA.n��y� // I ‘._,_.\ / . .,i// / : ,i. --e- i � 0 i / i II .7 r�Sr�c 4 -� __` 1 I r ---) • 1 A . P. „.: o \ /` --_ - GAS ' - / 1isk vPlir A _______)o A.iil 41 j r ,,,W o/ NNNNN\ I: -1 1 _ / • • I.... �.. -5+ //�^4� jr, .>l.\N` \4\V.'..\`.i"i'tiO'AS<.71R\7.\ww.r` - 1 PANHANDLE EASTERN RIPE LINE COMPANY 635 No. 7th E4riohton, Colorado 90601 (7;03) 659-5922 Pebr-'uary 7, 1.989 Mr. Brian 3. i no 1 e, Current Planner Weld County Planning Commission 91 10th Street Greeley, CO. 30631 RE: Case #L1 R--074 Dear Mr- . Bindle: Please find enclosed a copy of our as-built map. which shows; our pipelines, 16--10-075--146-4" and 14--10--075•-.726--4" in the hi- lighted areas, located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West. Weld County, Colorado. We maintain c1 50-foot wide right-of-way on all pipelines and will not: allow any building within that easement area. The owner or developer shall have the right to construct and maintain utility lines, streets, sidewalks, and driveways, which may be installed at approximate right angles to the pipeline herein authorized, provided, however, that all utilities cross under our pioea. Ine ond maintain 18 inches clearance from our ai oel i ne. No paved or traveled portion of any street, sidewalk, driveway, road, Parkin() area? alley or curbing will be placed substantially parallel to and within fifteen (15' ) of the pipeline. ):n the event of a proposed crossing with a road or utility. Please contact Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNIX) at 534--6700 tLoc:al & Metro Denver) or 1-800-922-1 987 (Outside the Metro area) ,, with two (2) business days notice_, and at no cost to you, we will locate and mark: our lines to eliminate iminate accidents that cart occur -from foreign forces. Panhandle Eastern will be more than happy to work with you on this prof ect y however, if for any reason our line`~ must be moved, it will be at the expense of the developer or the person or persons asking for this, movement. 890372 1i additional io.forma Jn it needed, please call* at 659-5922 5922' e:t 24:1 , or direct. at 654-9241 . Sincerel Y. % - Ken 3. Nef Rioht-of--Wary Representative i.4;'4r-/KNL 1 r L. I� ` FCR S n 1959 writ Cu- Vlau.anq duBimIS51BU 590372 N cn t � •to , 1..,✓ t t6 : 1;4 % \ 4 "ia.b. ,..�` �,', • i . 90°00 - - - .0; • ( a- V9-10-075-284-3��-.. i .11 , 7 r ACr AMOCO- - • RA®SMACKER-I , - (\MS.8175 l it < y \ 19-10-075=286-,3" , . r r, • . .. ( .JO; i1 Jj! L /I 1 ti ` ` a 'S AMOCO a CAME 844 l \ rj Ass.. • to/1 :1358-3" , •I - • . : T� • , ri-o • 125 *I ror� •7' ` 14-10-075-326-4 / 10 87 1 019.10 075 481 • it -4:" `. M9M SALT` `X .. MS 86f x .19-10-075-165"'S H-1 ` 1"t. `rpN;CA 58 29 1 rt. �` ',vs 8029 . .. . . . . /278.13. .. .... . 1 658.C. • - a5 ,60____t__- f . 125' l ! I 1r v •.ter ! 1 °NIE i rl6-to-o7s-146-4 903 U QM AMOCO GI.ANTZ-I , not. MS.B446 _ i }c1 497-47, C li _tn_ ccwc D central colorado water conservancy district 3209 West 28th Street Greeley. Coloraoc 8063 (303) 330-4540/330-4541 • Metro (303) 825-0474 February 8, 1989 Weld County Planning Department Centennial Center 915 - 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Attn: Case No. USR-874 Dear Sir: Thank you for allowing us to comment on the proposed gravel mining operation of Phillip Camenisch. The application did not mention any plans for the evaporative losses of the mining operation to be covered by an augmentation plan. This will be necessary so that downstream irrigators are not injured by this operation. Sincerely, r--- ICalon Tom Cech Executive Director TVC/pr Enclosure 173)E5YiN7�;[1V dry;, I \I FEB 9 1989 h 8903'72 *la CD. Pb14i111t .tJIWnl}:::Df I I 1 IP DEPART." OF PLANNING SERVICES � ' y PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET wit GREELEY,COLORADO80631 • %ii i CASE NUMBER USR-C74 e COLORADO February 3, 19ES TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Phillip Camerisch for a Site Specific tevelopment Plan and a Special Review permit for an opet-vit wining operatinn end at asphalt and concrete batch plant. The parcel of land is described as the SW?, and the W3 SE,z of Section 10, T2N, EESW of the 6th P.m. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 3 tiles northwest of Firestone; vent of and adjacent to the rel Canino area, south of State Yigt•uay 119 and east of ticJ,1 County Road 7. This application is :utwitted to your office- for review and recommencation. Any comments or recommendation yct consider relevant to this request could be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will cn:ure prompt consideration of your recommendation. ^lease reply by February 21, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Currnet Planner, if you have any questions about this referral . Thank you for your help rrd cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and returt to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does rot) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. ______-- -c..-2-_-- .1 -72 ; 2. We do not have a Comprel+ensive Plan, but we feel this request _ (is/is not) colrpetible with the iuteresrs of our �T ='1 town for the following reasons: j c> . - .. .. .0 zl (' -- "� ri 3. X t,c ha 'e reviewed the propos ] :-nd find no conflicts with our tct- l.,) interest::. 4, . fcrt,at recommendation is under corsideratica and will be submitted to ;cu prior to:_____—• . _ 5. Please refer to tile; enclosed letter. Signed: _L 14.4 Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District Date _ February 14, 1989 890372 • •LVV�+.x� v�`� Woo.�n6..�w.4-.vvt..v� . DEPARTMF PLANNING SERVICES ‘\U PHONE(303)3564000 En 4400 91510th STREET & , GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 y. dh � 4 ?•'r CASE NUMBER USR-874 • COLORADO February 3, 19E9 TO WHOM IT NAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Phillip Camenisch for a Site Specific iievelopment Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. The parcel of land is described as the SW and the W§ SE of Section 10, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 3 miles northwest of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino area, south of State Highway 119 and east of Weld County Road 7. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comment:: or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by February 21, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Single, Currret Planner, if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. X We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: � (Gtti r\�r?f 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. D�..� �= ' Signed: ✓ MAgency: �/o F'^ \ FEB 7 1989 Date: r yo G 8 9 890372 lhid CO. Mama 8amm1SU04 J 00 DEPAR•* OF PLANNING SERVICES Y J , PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.BE00 5 10th STREET GREELEv,COLORADO 80631 CASE NUMBER USR--E74 COLORADO February 3, 19ES TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Phillip Camcrisch for r. Site Specific Tievelopmcnt Plan and e Special kc',iew permit for an open-pit mining operation end an asphalt and concrete batch plant. The parcel of land is described as the SW! and the Wi SF of Section 10, T2N, 1:ESW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is approximately 3 tiles northwest of Firestone; vast of and adjacent to the tel Camino area, south of State Pigivay 119 and east of Well County Read 7. This application Is outwitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation yet ccrsi.der relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply vii. help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by February 21, 1989, so that we ray give full consideration to you: recommendation. Please call Brian 3. Single, Currret Planner, if you have any questions about this referral . Thank you for your help and coeperetinn in this matte~. Check the appropriate boxes below and recur;: to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed rhis request and fi:LC that the request (does/does rot) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the toilowing reasons. Do t 21 2, We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we 1 this request Z +' �.:.' f:p: (is/is not) cenupetible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: w tit( 3. kc hrve reviewed the proposal mnd find no conflicts with our interest... 4. P formal recommendation under consideration are will be 1/ submitted to you prior to: _ 5. X Please refer to the enclosed letter. /� Signed: 1 - M �4) _. .-Agency: ajlei Una. Lt1 .s✓. S:1iskci natt: W_SC 890372 ice. A libDEPARTMF PLANNING SERVICES s 3 tt," PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT.4400 ;' 91510tt+STREET w•s t`,t• 4• y� GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 `T37 FEB 1989 to;P� rr.1 1A { r O oNT� N` '4 'p a CASE NUMBER USR-874 _ COLORADO February 3, 1969 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Phillip Camcrisch for o Site Specific _ Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining - operation are an asphalt and concrete batch plant. The parcel cf land is described as the SW; and the WI S1-1 of Section 10, T2N, REBW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which - this application has been submitted is approximately miles northwest of Firestone; vest of and adjacent to tie tel Camino area, south of State ='igh"ay 119 and east of 44230 County Road 7. - This application is kcbmitted to your office for review and recortriendation. Lny comments or recommendation yc+. ccrsider relevant to this request would - be appreciated. Your prompt reply ci l help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your. recommendation. ^lease reply by February 21, 1989, se that we ray give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Cvrrret Planner, if you have any questions about this referral . ;hank you for your help and cooperation in this matte).. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1 . _ _ We have reviewre this request and fin'- t'bot the recuest - (does/does rot) comply with our Comprehensive Plan - for the following reasons. rte ___ -- --- €' co _1.�, We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request :1.9 ! {is/is not) compatible with the interests of our - ao *olwn fur the following reasons: w '• Y _.: ,f� tt X X 1,c hcvc reviewed the propos,7 ,.nd find no conflicts with our � �� interests. 4. / formal recommendation t:rder consideration and will be submitted to you prior tc:____T__- 5. Pease refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: , I .y :5,,,,,AZD Agency: to.vc',o )r esia, /',:'o p--cri6 2 72,crccT flee' l/IN CSA'4t- "ate' . __6- 82 r ' /% t S . II Tri-Area Planning Commission P. 0. Box 363 Frederick, CO 80530 February 9, 1989 Mr. Brian J. Bingle Current Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80531 Dear Mr. Single: Per my telephone conversation with Lanell J. Curry on February 8, 1989, I stated the Tri-Area Planning Commission held their regular meeting on February 7, 1989. At this time application from Phillip Camenisch for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plan was heard. A motion was passed to deny application due to no representation to answer questions. This Commission feels this a very important issue concerning our community and as you are aware, we feel very strongly about having someone present to answer questions. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Alzit Becky Marker Secretary Tri—Area Planning Commission In' Re' [I 1 rFR 1 3 1989 Weta Cu. Ptawuax iumimgmw 590372 • • • • MAILING LIST Phillip Camenisch USR-874 Kirk and Dawn Hollenbeck 10003 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Arthur Koldeway 6228 North County Road 13 Loveland, CO SC537 St. Vrain, Ltd. c/o Richard Domenico 8200 West 67th Street Arvada, CO 80004 William and Shirley Silvers 10608 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Dorothy Larson 10706 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Mountain Empire Dairyman WDIC P.O. Box 33120 Thornton, CO 80233-0120 Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 William and Margaret Kobobel 7909 Weld County Road 5 Longmont, CO 80501 John T. Cooper 9998 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Harold and Fred Reese 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 Mobile Home Properties River Valley Mobile Home Park 3924 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 890372 MMEMMEMENNE NAILING LIST PHILLIP CAMENISCR USR-874 Names added February 7, 1989 S.L. and Nancy Groom - 9777 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Mountain Empire Dairymens Association 12450 Washington Street Thornton, CO 80241 • • 890372 • CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case 1/USR-874 for Phillip Camenisch in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 6th day of February 1989. ^ \ • TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS OR OWNERS AND LESSEES OF MINERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WELD COUNTY'S NOTIFICATION. REQUIREMENTS. The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 7, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: USR-874 APPLICANT: Phillip Camenisch REQUEST: Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant LEGAL: The SW* and the W} SE} of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County. Colorado LOCATION Approximately 3 miles northwest of Firestone; west of and adjacent to the Del Camino Area, south of Highway 119 and east of Weld County Road 7 For more information call Brian J. Single, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES • 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 890372 • • DEPAFeIS OF PLANNING SERVICES L41 PHONE(303)358.4000 EXT.4400 �` 5 Toth STREET GREELEY,COOLORADO 80831 ,try is c COLORADO February 3, 1989 Mr. Phillip Canenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80651 Re: PSR-874 - Request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant on a parcel of land described as the SW} and the Wi SE} of Section 10, T2M, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. near 1:r. Camenisch: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order or the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 7, 1989, at 1 :30 p.r. This resting will take place in the County Commissioners' Rearing Room, iirst floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members night have with respect to your application. it is the policy of Weld County tc refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the prcperty in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of .. town or municipality. Therefore, our office has .forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to both the Longmont and Tri-Area Planning Commissions for review and comments. Please call Marta Eromschwig, City of Longmont, at 651-8329 and Rebecca Marker, Tri-Area Planning Commission at 740-7100 for further details regarding the date, time and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at both the Longmont and Tri—area Pianrir.g Commission meetings to answer any questions the Commission members nay have with respect to your application. It ie the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least ten (iC) days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior. to February 15, 1989, you or a representative should cell re to obtain a sign to he posted or, the site no later than February 25, 1989. 890372 . . • • • Mr. Phillip Camenisch February 3, 1989 Page 2 _ The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of an applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Respectfully, . LL / U1.SM ar:... . �:� C sr nt P1 nner BJB:rjg pc Steffen Robertson and Kirsten Consulting Engineers 3232 South Vance Street, Suite 210 Lakewood, CO 80227 890372 I . . . IIMIIIIIIIM • iii Affidavit of Pubtication SfAlE OF COLORADO • County of Weld as, t A.wlnkler Memel of said County of Weld being duly sworn.say Iliac t am pubhahe of PLATTEVILLE HERALD P1200 10 11.3 lttOA that. the same Is a weekly newspaper of general circulation was pitted and published In the town of Moms a.vwia Ices s .'47-0,•,- *.r>• . ti r 1\, PLATTEVILLE si . ' t In reed county and state that the notice of advertisement.of which 111 1M . the anmted Is a true copy has been published in said weekly raasv sr ps atea.m,s see newspaper for Scats a sit►RIMS.ores- 7CLsawMa V-a Meat sr. ��— ronsecu rive weeks: rnt w ' that the notice was published t the regular end entho tame of ever/ ; heaths,;earriMasts;a cscare. number of said newspaper tun the period and time ofpubbcaoon MllettY dMrr_J_*,t•.-CM._.._ of said nice and in the neawpspa proper and not In a supplement thereof:that the fret publicaeao of said notice was contained in the Sur Semille11310-. wrier Iwo-toadnewspaper bearing the date of rM caas-es M N.el Ma of sera. 41,---14---1^/ / A.D. 19."�' and the last publication P j 'sirwi�i. r MIS ; thaco4 In the issue of said newopapa,bearing date. 2rl►l Aan:,IM'rms e, O.s.., p M9rous east as ai1Mplc the_L.,,_day of , ime awl s.milts _47/-�'t `--- 19Fe' that the said : ay�iets�t el s w• al..ara,laillaimettilltatei,. Cnalss gli'.a1 }rr PLATTEVILLE HERALD �Miroftrswraaraiwald has been published continuously and uninterruptedly during the .: ..:- t 7ipsiM,/a�s,Misss ; period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first 't park"header.Ste IWe issue thereof containing cad notice ce advertisement above referred - be t•stpl/Cspsr CrtieMlm+ to: and that said newspaper was at the time of each of the etNa Mara rise Meer. publications of said notice duly*Willed for that purpose within the _ eeel T It Cr!rasw.Cast.. meaning of an act added. 'An Mt Concerning Legal Notices. - _. - _ Advertisements and Publications and the Feea of Pithier. and • oaaa reteetaeMa " "^_'_'_: Publlshan and to Repel WI Mr and P am in rand! ca - "��alm. with Provisions of the a 7.1 l.a�d has a tw ati hart tewNY'M es<lwew Claratlgstanwe al a9 end . and partl en d by an ._ Pme alse.-MMNa.esM rime'.. s and aa May 3.1 1. Swam lems.342,.0tmerre:Cm me a ISatetraaein /! dhess •�rr-MaaarO stele ISSMt er reset.*ie^se►r leagawsw aw ~ - d and sworn to 4afore me this_i_day of �mety 'e ,. �.!- 7 c 1 _... a,.sen CMS. sill The1 ✓ ��-� Notary Public �41S /DENVrr ER AVENUE OW _sl.rasas..ew�IrWtwY�. FT. L UPTON CO 80621 ataariersr frslwM lb• r +arir`d:1Mi`'�Ne1fi.•'k7ra.d„ My commission expires June 1992 My Cc ri;-.:::,:;;oxai,F; knee 20,1092 rnipi. -.5-0J,9,i7y _ MAR 6 1989 111 _J Weld Co. Planning t:ommis;lcn 890372 March 16, 1989 Dept of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sirs, I a;, writing in regards to the Phillip Camenisch request for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for an open-pit mining operation and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. Some areas of concern I have are the traffic impact, over a short and long term period of time , the air and noise quality, the economic feasibility at this time and hours of oeration. To help you understand my concerns let me point out some of the existing conditions at this time. Proposed in this permit are truck travel routes of Road 7 to Hwy. 119. This is the same routes already being used by approximately 6-7 other mining operations in the area. If each operation has 30-40 round trips each day this will create a serious traffic flow problem. These roads are also heavly traveled by residence, school buses, and visitors to Barbour Ponds recreation area. Because of heavy traffic traveling to and from Longmont on Hwy 119, there is already a degree of difficulty getting off and on Road 7 at particular times of the day. For the safety of all concerned I feel that a traffic study should be done during weekdays and business hours. Following that study I 'm sure you will find that turn lanes and traffic lights should be installed. Because there are existing asphalt and concrete batch plants in the area and one proposed and approved within two miles north, I feel the noise and air quality will drop well below acceptable living standards. I recommend that the permit be denied at this time unless the applicant addresses these areas with satisfactory standards to the surrounding residences. As proposed in this application, mining operations appear to take 15-20 years. That being the case this proposal plus all those in existance will impact the area for along time. And right now because the economy is slow the mining operations are not mining out what they hoped to initially. So the economic feasibility of another mining operation in this area at this time is in serious question. I recommend that the County adopt a ten year time frame limit to be put on all mining operations. Also a limitation on hours and days of operation should be required of all mining operations, such as daylight hours, 5 days a week. 880372 r • • Pg. 2 It is necessary for the County to take a long term look at the total impact that gravel mining has on an area. And not just - approve permit after permit because no objections are raised. It is the responsibility of the paid representatives of this County as well as the unpaid volunteers to represent all those concerned in any area of developement. The County needs to review existing guide lines and establish new ones for all - open-pit mining operations. This will assure protection of other property owners as well as developers. - Unless the above areas are addressed specifically, I recommend that this permit be denied at this time. Please enter this as a written objection to the requested permit. Sincerely, Ivan & Marlys Gosn?11 _ 11488 Weld County Ra. 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 1oMAR 2 0 1989 t figid CD. Plmi.nnt ..P.n.me.au 1 590312 - • Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 • Addendum: Truck traffic generated by this operation will be approximately 100 trigs per day. Trucks will he 25 ton belly and end dmip trurka. Haul routes would be Weld Cty. Rd . 7 North to State Highway 119, or South to Highway 52 . Wor%ers vehicles would average 8-10 a day. Tbey •could he in and out of mining area once a day using same route 2d .7 and goinr, to either State Highway 119 or State Highway 52 and onto their destinations . Addendum: Mineret Owners Owners of Substance to be mined in --SW Section :0 scn:n:;hin 2 North Range GB We' t of the 6th P.M. Weld Cty, C:oluzado PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH RUSSELL J . & KATHERINE C.OWEN wi of SE Section 10 Township 2 North Range_ 68 Went of +:',e P.M. Weld Cty , Colorado PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH 890372 a • damismemmis WELD COUNTY, COLORADO USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION for MINING PERMIT Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, Phone 356-4000, Extension 4400 For Department of Planning Services Use Only Case Number: Date Application Received: PC Hearing Date: Section: , Township: North, Range: West Zoning District: Recording Fee: Permit Fee: Recording Fee Receipt #: Recfpt Number: • Application Reviewed By: To be completed by APPLICANT in accordance with procedural guide Requirements: 1. I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed �c�*1(1 t navel_ (gravel, coal, borrowpie, etc.) mining operation for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ail r 1a cr> c1n TIM fCRN of *tin F*h D M Wn1A rnnn1-v . rnlnr,An • • TOTAL ACREAGE: 2. Surface owner(s) of area of land described Name: ramenisGhAddrese: 10504 WELD Ctv.$d. 7Phone:772-0797 Name: Address: Phone: 3. Owner(s) of mineral rights to substance to be mined Name: r1,; 11 i r Camnni ,,,]Address: locnn weld Cry pc; 7Phone:772 n797 Name: Address: Phone: 4. Source of applicants' legal right to enter and to mine on the land described: nnnAc (Attached certified copy of any document noted to the back of this form) 5. Address of applicant and general office Applicants address: 1n504 Weld rf•v p,i 7 Phone: 772_Q7d7 General Office address: Phone: 6. Identify any prior permits for mining held by applicant or affiliated person: None 890372 St • • 7. Description of Operation a. Types and number of operating an processing equipment to be employed: Aggregate will be excavated with loaders. ,dg . .r^ S ..^, ran s. £upi ment to he ucecl zt thf! 'flant includes a_crunher. screens, convenors and stackers. crnlnhnncn. b. Maximum number of employees: 14 and number of shifts: 1 c. Number of stages to be worked: 5 , and periods of time each is co be worked: Divided into five nhanes depicted on the Mining Na' sheet 1 of 2 enclosed in review boot:. d. Thickness of mineral deposit: 18' feet. and thickness of the overburden: 1_a, . e. This will be a wet/dry pit operation. f. Site entrance/exit points and county reads and bridges to be utilized between site and de]4very point(s) (must be coordinated with County Eng=ineer) : Weld Ctv Rd .7 Existing site rntrancr- 8. Description of Rehabilitation a. Proposed rehabilitation land use(s) : Agriculture, Lake b. Source of technical advice for reclamation: Steffen Robertson F. Kirstein Consulting Engineers c. Explanation of Reclamation Process: Leaving a pond with revogetated shoreline on much of the western portion of the property . The eastern 40 acres of the site will he had ; filled , graded and revegetated. I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld STATE OF Colorado jr- ./ thresr"%ed---rs-A.. Signature: J .`ner/Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31 day of s /0.(1/!!/74 , SEAL _,24:41 Viii ,lfr'fr,COk( NOTA Y UBLgC My Commission expires r2"1(P-U. • 8903'72 t • 7. Description of Operation a. Types and number of operating an processing equipment to be employed: er:renat.e viii be excavated with loaders, , doter_ __r,s &s a prs. Ea inm n to he used at the »laot includes a crusher, qpreens, Convenors and stackers. Scalehouse. b. Maximum number of employees: 14 . and number of shifts: 1 c. Number of stages to be worked: 5 , and periods of time each is co be worked: Divided into five phases depicted on the Mining Man sheet 1 of 2 enclosed in review boot:.. d. Thickness of mineral deposit: 18' feet. and thickness of the overburden: 1_3' . e. This will be a wet/dry pit operation. f. Site entrance/exit points and county roads and bridges to be utilized between site and delivery point(s) (must be coordinated with County Engineer): Weld Ctv Rd. 7 Existing site entrance . 8. Description of Rehabilitation a. Proposed rehabilitation land use(s): Agriculture, Lake b. Source of technical advice for reclamation: Steffen Robertson t Kirstein Consultina Enrrineers c. Explanation of Reclamation Process! Leaving a pond with revecretated shoreline on much of the western portion of the property. The eastern 40 acres of the site will he back filled , graded and revenetated. I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plane submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF Weld STATE OF Colorado / -71'4C Signature: aner/Authorized Agent and sworn Co before me this 3$ day of r !(�/11!/1!t/ , 14 7 • SEAL intNOTA Y �UBL fi r L ritRki My Commission expires 12-1((1-92. • 890372 December 1 . 1988 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Sreet Greeley, CO. 80631 The gravel pit operation would be consistent with the present area and according to tests already taken is economically feasible. The use would go along with current mining already on the west and north adjacent properties. Future uses would be a large lake which would have shoreline reseeded with native grasses and natural vegetation. This goes along with plans for the future in this area as there are already several new man made lakes. Domestic water, if needed, would be furnished by Left Hand Water Co. of which I already have a 5/8" tap. Sewage would be septic tank, Jiffy Johns, or placed on new sewer district when it is finished in this area. Electricity would be Union Rural Electric and Rocky Mountain Natural Gas for heating. The future development for this land is agriculture to the south, gravel mining operations, housing and dairy to the north of us. I believe this is consistent with what is already located in the area and will make no immediate change . 890372 • • AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS • SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property cw% C TA crk c'n T2N RFiFRW or THE RTH P. M. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. (II The foregoing r instrument was subscribed p and sworn to before me this 3i day cJQ.niOH/ igve by Phr 11 r . rci,imorp;-441 WITNESS my hand and official seal . My Commission expires: (2.—U.0 432. . (APCk1 f l f arcs UprrITS)k Notary Public 890372 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS,• TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 1i Kirk & Dawn Hallenbeck 10003 Weld Cty. Rd.7 131309000037 Longmont, Colo.80501 Arthur Koldeway 6228 N. Cty. Rd. 13 131309000070 Loveland, Colo. 80537 St.Vrain LTD 8200 W. 67th 131309000071 @ Richard Domenico Arvada, Colo. 80004 131309000069 William & Shirley Silvers 10608 Weld Cty. Rd.7 131310000078 Longmont, Colo. 80501 Dorothy Larson 10706 Weld Cty. Rd.7 131310000088 Longmont, Colo.80501 Mountain Empire Dairyman P.O.Box 33120 131310000063 WDIC Thornton, Colo. 80233-0120 Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld Cty. Rd.7 131315000025 Longmont, Colo. 80501 William & Margaret Kobobel. 7909 Weld Cty.Rd.5 131315000026 Longmont,Colo. 80501 John T.Cooper 9998 Weld Cty. Rd.7 131315000079 Longmont, Colo.80501 Harold S. Fred Reese 855 Sunrise Hwy. 131310000041 Lynbrook, New York 11563 131310000042 131310000043 Mobile Home Properties 3924 Highway 119 131310000037 River Valley Mobile home Park Longmont, Colo. 80501 890372 _ _ 4 • NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS. TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION // walm cry. Entineerina Deot. P. 0. Box 758 Greeley, Colo. 80632 • 890372 I i AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property ewk c wk eok stn T9N R6SW OF TwF FTW P . M. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this SI day of Ja/Rl h, , 19867. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: /;?-16, 42 c ACII/4I 'V1Olir2 ifamtrid Notary Pudic 890372 8 1177 R 02121935 11/20/87 09:56 b3.0 1/001 AR2121935 ,_ F 0916 ! ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK i RECORDER ti� CO, CO y QUIT CLAIM DEED Y e THIS DEED.Madethia 19th day of November .1987 . - between PHILLIP E. CAREN ISE% `.1 a the 'County of Weld IS State of ' Colorado.gnomons),and y J PIIILLIP E. CMMENISCH ` wrote kgal addn:u is 10504 Weld County Road 17, Longmont, CO of the said County of Weld and Suk of Colorado.graeWefsl WITNESSETII.That the gnmor(a1 for and In consideration of the mimed NO CONSIDERATION DOLLARS IM receipt and avdkiency of whkh is hereby aknow1e4tt ha s noised.Nkwd.hold,convoed and QUITCLAIMED.and by tee rearms do es remise.Kluat,all.convey and QUITCLAIM ma the rmtrafal his hilt.cuanton.a d maigna, • • former.all all the MOW.Stk. inwms,claim and demand whkh Me pmtorU)has M and lo ibe teal peopetay,towhee with :• . implometwma,If any,Orvate.lying lad king U the said Co ml.( Meld sad Stilt Of ' Colorado.described u tallowy a The East One-Malf of the Southwest Quarter Of SeCtion 10, Township 2 North, Pangs 60 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. ti • n • ;. FAMILY TRANSFER - NO STATE DOCU,¢NTARY FEE REQUIRED ,, iiI1 II I i I II also known by god and numberas: Veit wag 14.J IITO HAVE AND TO HOLD the tame,menhir with all and singuies the appwleuntea and privileges thlenunto belonging a in ll NyWlw lneKYnlO sppenai&ng.and.0 the aisle,.deb,Oat,InwaY and claim Y'ha110e.eLof the rMla(a),tuba a law ae4Vlly,to ! 1 the only proper use.benefit and Woof of the graaln4al his Min and assigns forever, IIW WITNESS WHEREOF.Thegnaanal has neonedllda deed a she dace act forth gam II PHI . CAMLN7'SCH Ld.FP STATE Of COLORADO, , I as. Cowry of eoulder The taegeing Instilment rss atnowkdledbefes lne chi. 19th day of November .19 97• I by Phillip E. Caaenis isch. My Y ..�, Q1 4.7 .199r .Wiseu nyhand and ofhtJ oral, i n JANE Y. y, MEM i11.A,. Oh• e-c I 't o� Jay (1�A,,a(.11 St. • -di_ cnl-�° ld1t}(YYsC.tt/ CO 80501 '; •If in Den!er.inxn nand.' l Ne.933.Nm.,LAOMa, 0 Oros Oar a.J.eesreas rat)w N.. a.. 1, `N.CO d:n_a)Writs .m 890372 D 1177 02121934 11/20/87 09:50 a3� 1/001 �Ik' .mtele1934 ,,_ F 0915 bARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLER% 6 RECORDER ‘LO CO, CO raj • QUIT CLAIM DEED 4:a • I THIS DEED,tdoft Iris 19th artof November .19 07. -vi;- • 1L• l.etwen (*HILLIP E. CAYINISCH ,tii a?f rl dig' 'Cwmy u( Weld and Sale of .Pfe Colorado,yramognt and r3 PIIfLLIP C. GAa1CNISCII •• whu,e kg,'aJdna is 1O50a Mold County Road 17, Longmont, CO I %4 der said County of Weld and Su*otCelnado.grave(s1 .4 at, W'ITNESSETII.That the gnntm(Ml foe end in Consideration of the mm of NO CONSIDCM?IO.Y OOUJ.R1 weir.'andwrdciency of welch is hereby actnowlcdred,has nlnhtd.raved.JAR mauled 04 QUIT CLAIMED.Ohl by 'If he weir.' erne presents do eremite.redraw,acH,convey and QUIT CLAIM umo the granieNsl his heir.means"and POP". framer,all the ngw,title, internal,claim and dcnwW whkh the Cramoe(s)hag in and no doe nil properly,together withle of la' impnwenwnu.ifany.sbuse.lying nod being In the said Coney Of Weld Colorado,*scribed ai follow: {: SI. The West Ono-Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 2 North, , Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. ( if i FAMILY TRANSFER - NO STATE DOCUIcITARY FEE UV1RED T I l I a iI s '1 OmMA,+• (.5i a w tntwsumon by sumo and number a: V TO IIAYE AND TO HOLD the tame,together with all and singular die apponenmtn and privilege'he or In reunto belonging .n)WiIC ireunlo af Ipenaining.and all the[Male.VII,title,interne and claim whataener,of to gnnor(el either in!mew,equity,to I • the only pester uw,benehi and bettor of the granwc(ml his beN add amigos foist :1 i f IN WITNESS WHEREOF.The LnntoQal ha s aeeu'M this dad on the One Me foe', oe ob . Ij . aiii is i re-r___ ,z. , t, I; PHILLI . ChMEN27Ca . • I!` STATE OP COLORADO Ceumy of Boulder The foregoing laWumeeew acLeowtedgedhe(an ma shit 19th dry of November •19$7 ' by PhillL Capenlsch. ' Ot�y P49r p az ,1991 .W u my had tad Axial seal, t hl on non tap. * • JANE V. " / �[1 NEIL g.joat',^. / 1 I i O ww '` `a. 1 , fAhl�'. r t F RQ ^.r nl}l,0 . got-01 L cMmct!' eo 8D 'If in Denver,sawn"City Ord; e \.. 411 w,. 1.\ Hs is 11\I.1„I.r. n..w.a1,YnM1y • . w•..,.. Iwiw..a.,.w... .\,,,a.•Imo •r . w � � 8903a(�1 ,_ Y:1I V r ii • I r '. , f_41 t . 't vs.,i+ �4, . rltV t . N, r 1 -lsrrfr r .:.\ •"' r n ' 'a •_ .. ;Tr .'Y. I ` 6,''1\ 44 •J 1wa ,Y4,f..2 r e •tit ,, 5�I• e}k . r t sired ,,,,,,5•14,I,;‘,1.41 , / `� t . � It AA .f t I t n, � �\4} l/, (�•r tNI . 4' w w 1 i.l r AI „�•1 '` i C , t.' 't1 ii 1 r'n 1 $7r�1 ti*4 c, }•" .,I r t 'lc?.1, � t eon•5/, ,x,}�,�f 4, 1•V t '6,tl.,. �Ir • 4.i•*�i t r / 1 1 , r 7 . ,tI , '1} 'j' .,54t , p.••//\t+ ICn ki/r . 2",1.,..,/,r,..,4 1 ( > > ,A[ rt /`C• 1fir Yr t„ , (+ l i 5} 1; ''r rQ , .1 M ;1 .(" , 'ti' L.2.;4: 3 !!Jo J7SI 'O . ' / /( r1 qq r /,./ h i.1td•C'V ;;;4"4:510:1:,Irlc:i•sei'r"4,41,1[ .`..i.l i' ec k war / 51 t s{fl � r . ,r''r ,,• . ',/, ,J 1 . rMa +) r r r•� Y�S`V+�1fV�I�{rl•'4`i �.,r`�''gS .)Y frdv�+ff,, `}H �yyy..t 'J1 Gl�l.v// 1jt+t� �•9> •�aV.t , � y.1e... V!1•.Y . , T.,,, JI'ei r.r,r., rR t/.. . f.h.. f. •, t s • ) tout 794 S°5 C/ DEC 101976 it: ,; ,, N Rae,pUaa Na. 1705C00v.AMqJtv:RSTLIN. _.. *Heider. (..C RUSSELL J. CVEN and CATtttRINt C. UdeN, +' I husband and wife. ..'�J`r, - I whose sddns■is 1020 Emory Straet, Longmont, Stole pa.umwdoty rip. I r. , ` ` County of Boulder ,Staten: Edo. DEC 10197&• " z q r• s_1._.62......--- 0 k'l'' o Colored* .for the consideration of ( Ten dollars and other valuable consideration u',• o denim in hand paid,hereby sell(s) and con ay(s) to m ',I. * :H S11IR1Zy A. GMENISCM and PIIILLIP E. CAMENISCM, ''e w t rhoae►ddreu Is Route 1 4, Do: SJ, Longmont • County of r1My„7 c Veld ,and State of • -. 4Colorado the following real property Inn the c 5 Si - C. County of veld ,and State of Colorado.to rat: � , o(4 I c The southwest quarter (Svk) of Section ten (10), in Township two p U V fix.r�.t , S (2) North, Range sixty-eight (68) ;feat of the 6th P. M., Vold County, u • `, - i! • Colorado; together with all ditch end water tights appertaining to said pteedses, including three aed one-fourth (3k) shakes of the - . . `Ar. capital stock of The Rural Ditch Company; and reserving one-half • ns -� oil, '' of all/coal, gas and other minerals for the life-time of grantors. • 4 II,a r w' ,,V. I with an Ira appurienentes.and warrant(s) the title to the aame,subject bo taxes Lot the ! year 1976; and existing right■ of way and aasawnts; r. ;" 4.... t 'tisf ' �O Signed this ' >1 day of �}.,/cinf/ ,19 J6 Q. • STATE OF COLORADO. la. a• County of DOtlLDER 11�,.�4 ill The foregoing.Intstrument was acknowledged before me this 15 y"' ^'J'i•,:` dayof .t. ,/51— .19 36,b7 Russell J. Men end Catharine C.0wes, •.M 1^'•Xy husband sod wife. :il ae D.sc 4r . j�11........./i It � r ?3 /177 . i /f �yy�� official saa� 7 / II q a d L 1, .o ' � m...Nat •r ,'', i. !,Y• I, ,• ' Ni.rat. wMmY m.re-e4a Pa-e,.r ae.w.ar Ca.weMau..,Mart p.r.r...r... Gill 890372 � :. a f•I 1 a r t. rd. �ft1.!�Kr r J�rtr( a Y yk.I 11'•,I s. -t. tt ; n ,tt`, , �4't`�ti.'l.h,}1•I�-.� ��. . }y S ! r • 4 X, 1 . rtEt Y1.,� ^v r fns .r/..s...; ! .r tent.1 <: hi,t ✓ _ (. I .' t t I; ` rq4,4. '.1 N, W , k' 't �•yl+ t', ...P 5 r. yrr 1 9 HI ••�, 4 •'(a vX t 4 r ` 'r ; .dSly „ r7+_'..e a esr fa• !Ld '`thy`., Y , r y{�� aN'r .....,.., . _.,„. ., .........../..,. x i.ltrerd.! e , Il' .:, -7)51.irS 1 s. 7+1..._ .ti . ' F.v 5.4 irk YrwF..,..� ` ,( +r K• •;t r s r f � r r s 'tfj �\* rY2iN�+v` `•,,, (,• ••;“,� f � w k n ,..n/nabs« r 4 tihC.) 4J.M. tf 11 N! V44''') .19 h y' r,7'Sr.'t 91v 11'1, 1 i'f .. { r Ir" `.1l .4 ,•M11"y(, v::',..t .k:.:..•,..1:1:2",:. ;.: rw•-s ....�'T rt., �� ti1 �*: i.. 'I� C �gf H+ ter LlV 1r1� ;i: 1 ..." )771 7111f '^I �"[t It t ! 1 1, r}✓ I.11 >r4 .r.T., rdtr his 1 x'� r- I .k. }k(L / t k,, �" ? ' t. 11,:a �C"f r ;Stilt-1}1 +` I J( r� ,s..._�: . l,• • i sir,� V.•7'. � .:.ittL iYtlron r CZj{ `.C .• r a..' IT ._ -- . -•" • Tilt Yr'.iii,renew, o' ar tar;iAra..; m; v . : :—..-, --. yr— d.sra.d etr._.c2.;s o'dockES,,... .1.40 to qr....219T.a . ; tV -. 758 leaDUen No......_1.�L ..G3& ..___.——...F,S.L.S...3.!IFtlCt-M—...Rennin. ' run Dim, Md.Oda ....odaa d wnnut.ry .1176 , 144 bona Shirley Ann ;nrrcnladr. ,E '?, .. ''tr,1.:>' ._ ,.:'� a., t„+ 'du. Cwnyd We id and tali of .O GLnde.Or tie tint part and phSnip L. UuraanAMnn .o -4 .d the Catty of :V Y.0 sad stela e( p.iwodo„d are west Pert :j't" ,4. • w?CNradrnf.sat s...s puav it tb first pert for And la taW. mtla of Ur.tut of' 0 One D011ar t•nd othor liana Sae rt.t Ion-- DOLLARS. + {,.. « to the pail play ad U-n ad pelf not part to h by the nM party ad O.wand pert tie oat wino( s ee Is hna,slaws ad ae4os.kdP4 have rtwlmod,nal. rl, reareta ad QUIT ctsrmsD, ad Ya . ti M1 ry"1 0 that pv Saw.to do nod..,S. .wg o.nr a tad QUIT CLAIM onto the sad party of the mood part J. 0 Lim We..mars sad sad.,Somer..D U.Hat. UU.. Ininnt, dabs AAA doodad whisk W said .' poky' d the first Dart ti S d a a tr W felk.tlne d.ssiad 1.t or pared of load .list., woe d 1 gRy,�1�' .- .b- bear le Ow -Canty of :!O It: and data of Colorado,to rtt tej liG1 at 'F- r a Tile eOuthweat Snorter (3'A;)o:' an^.t.,..,, outs lsj), in townst.1;.; tau tr T tr a 14 (e) t.Ort'h, of rsnr,., n1xty-c1fnt (S,; won:. In 'data JOvnty, Jotorauut . twgtltner w1'.1 'IAA Olt' , I1nd Water rlrntd a ..crtllln:ar t0 sold rcj10.w, At..,....,aur, t11/'eO one one-: (3;) shr. = p}t r,,�"l J 67r1n r�7 or too a t.l J". , atolk or the Rural Dlttetl :0I.1„Say, jyCJba to cr..saLlnr, rlcnto of 1;'. 6.t?!.;.:' a;• way and oaacr_en..O. 4'rw at'r fl, . ;Ait I - Y . tr. TO MR AI AND TO MOLD the sac toathmo sad with allsingular the Appurtenances and privates thomat. "11.2F d _oy�v htkaelae or Is advise thereesto app.rteataei led a Um ste%richt.tla,teaming ud Asa eliminator.d mho Iy., • • mold Duty of the tint Part tithe'a mow er.4.1:.0 a a.ado annoy saeo beaflt ad babied et Ms sail �..' potty d sad the port. h i.p.lnd a watts fenny. ;;4i ".;''''''•'•�',, 1N111TTfidm 118Li[O?,Tb.yid party dtiu tint pan has Smooteeel her beet ;ifl •• .sd sal Ur day sod any flan along writ.. �J/�r, n r .'CS.L44liut L" d'/j Zder,�^ (UAL) ,il tic;:. .. mesa,Said sad Dews&Is a.Twes d r P,',',Y. "flAL1 t'l) dlAL) at'.w r ♦TATT OF COLORADO. ..... .. Cardd sa d . ., i.; rho t ,'•f'y 1.7 f omo4e ova srk h otfonsl w ado drM b.fan so the ..t Mad /..+.rr....Orte *•M ..' S!A( +Y• \.,t. Z-ro --nfs awe.. III .wlaatghsad sad Wilda rut. e rqr .It4 - K Jzb oA'p4)o • I'4 ../_/. %liI '.'?:,/4'.4 PU9 f!\tc 4/ Oolmritaeo. • ',t • 990372 Ae ti l:. • )4'44';, eawa,r• sir.r...z..... I a..sae one../....0 w oo loo•..0 r�ootio:��ai.�r�w er t r uet aw.n r s t mr•r�....aw----------.17.=. ,.y;',1 °. No,Phi WIT Otani ae.sa-e...r.e rw.rt C.. noww.a•I—,PASS dr....nlFMrn—rn s)Cf ,i 1 . I hil id I I t . . ,tr. •. , t I .'r t'-JM1 : 1jt,: A1. C.}..2.".• •• . •P`i rtt Yr Pt ;' r{, • ;e•. .. 1 _ r • ,Y 151 .J tit, \,,a',.1,..„2...'"4",r " r,,k+ tt! rA , ,,4yI" . 1 • • 2:,./...,,,,,,:i.,..,,,A;7...,...it.,14,•':;, ri r AP 1.a` ,. ,rl)I4Y y r-t 1 • .x,41C1.-:.`. ; . 'Ply, '4{ "1.):: � i1.,4.1q;(4A„ "y+1 .... • •1 u, +)Y ' " ° + ��t d�1 + ° or ' v"h? r der,: 1,. 11, it . i. e t Jt A�. tot.: sge,F. rrftti? • ' -i r }. _, +tits A 1; J.P" %'r.4 .'•.1: ill r , , a .Yrl _,,77,, r T'r ' "i L f n v. , r Si Jar ' ., . . lair t iE .10.7.1' l 'Il A .hr .., L t . Z1‘.`,,',•'.' t. 1 t r A. f>+ 's• .l✓ZW Kits r�A,'ti Y.3 t �r 1 } "in 1 ,\ ` n > ltl!W: yM try, f ! .•I,' +'I} .}. Y P.,t, . , ,•'''',.::tot �,` i 1 p`l lrtr �t ...4C)t+911 d,. ...; ,-(r.•,..',,,'-;1: , ',. 4. . 4 is!, ,wb..t...',.. .,. 'r%,.., :,....'+�.ew,...%'".L�l td .l:yr.o' '�P.�S. -Aitli" awl^` Jo-Z7:4.4.? , -a7rl:.. 1.':yr �.• .+.s.... ..r'� • "946 l' L..�y .. u St" WYw wu1Nr Recordedat.....Q..: ......o...O'clock f....3L, MOM��7.�f1 �, ...Q ^ V1 Reception No 67573DF1'".�["` Recorder. f-f The Longmont National Bank, Trustee • Mary Camenisch Trust • whose address is 436 Coffman, Longmont County of Boulder , State of ° Colorado , for the consideration of • dollars, in hand paid,hereby sell(s) and convey(s) to 0 Phillip Camenisch ° whose address is 10504 Weld County Road 7, Longmont County of r.+ Weld ,and stated Colorado the following real property in the n CI County of Weld • ,and State of Colorado,to wit: An undivided 1/12th interest in and to the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 10 in Township 2 North of Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. together with an easement over and across the North 30 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the "' Southeast 1/4 of said Section 10 for road purposes for ingress and egress to `:" and from the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 10; and together with all ditch and water rights appertaining to said premises. with all its appurtenances, and warrant(s) the title to the same, subject to • , a Signed this RS-it day of treat. , 19 sI. 44)64017-.4,4140.€144 !g1 _ _?R_$(st AIA Gets STATE OF COLORADO, ss. County of l'aot..lder The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �s"t' day of Qr.sKirt• east,- , 198'1 , by`Torn TZ1 . ‘tG'4^e.lory My commission expires 5o.vwtv...3 Is, Witness my hand and official seal. ly`lIdl1!!f °C? Q�wssa. tea..� .,........, x;:77570;117-- ?* Ittatr rryy..ttek e„tedp�ne.t t(o by=l per.on Or penoite hen I IOS ne xe or some.; I[by Parton tether In mortarr d lve a oftMrpC�.CItY•Of'Y•tlomay-In•ten than name none o! Person r executor et the pr-In-(net o.Other csotcl .aeet ar- t 1 �!��{ker K wlQor�tion then Insert name or ouch Ornery or offices u President or Other Otet?e n K ouch !Oh No. B9T." 41dray wed- noes- •ao.u8443.C ita.11O.--ae.ete a I nhmhnr Ct0314•tt Stan Stool Davit.Cando 890372 AK193278V g 0985ilit 0191^�7fl4 1.71?,,/87. °B �CORDER�WELD. CO,' (..o F 0894 MARY ANN FEUERSE CLEKK h DEED OF DISTRIBUTION BY PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE. THIS DEED IS MADE BY The Longmont National Bank. a national banking asso- ciation, as Personal Representative of the Estate of J. P. Camenisch. deceased. Grantor, to DAVID E. CAMENISCH, whose address is 3598 Highway 119. Longmont. CO. 80501. PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH. whose address is 10504 Weld County Road 7. Longmont, CO. 80501. @�,10' and ROBERT J. CAMENISCH. whose address is 4513 Weld County Road 32. Longmont. CO. 80501 cl GRANTEES; ' e� WHEREAS, the above-named decedent in his lifetime made and executed his `111 Q' Last Will and Testament dated June 26th, 1974. which Will was duly admitted to In- 'y formal probate on February 4th. 1981 by the District Court in and for the County of Weld and State of Colorado. Probate No. 81 PR 32; WHEREAS, Grantor was duly appointed Personal Representative of said Estate on February 4th, 1981. and is now qualified and acting in said capacity; WHEREAS. the Grantees are the persons entitled to distribution of the hereinafter-described real property, and Grantor is authorized and directed to distribute the same to Grantees; NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers conferred upon Grantor by the Colorado Probate Code and by said Will, Grantor does hereby sell. assign, transfer and set over unto Grantees, as the persons entitled to distribution of the property under the above-captioned Will, the following described real property situate in the County of Weld. State of Colorado, to-wit: An undivided 1/4th interest in and to the W1 of the SEk of Section 10, in Township 2 North, of Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , together with easement over and across the north 30 feet of the NEk of the SEk of said Section 10 for road purposes for ingress and egress to and from the W/ of the SE;t of said Section 10; and together with all ditch and water rights appertaining to said premises, including 2.29 shares of the capital stock of The Rural Ditch Company; with all its appurtenances. subject to existing rights of way and easements and • lien of the 1982 taxes. . EXECUTED THIS 14th day of December. 1982. THE LONGMONT NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association. as Personal Representative of the estate of J. P.� Camenisch. deceased, By - ..... Tom R. Kiteley. Trust Of filer. State of Colorado, ) County of Boulder, ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of December, 1982, by Tom R. Kiteley. Trust Officer of THE LONGMONT NATIONAL BANK. a national banking association, as Personal Representative of the estate of J. P. Camenisgha••deceased. • "�Ep 11 ....• Wp84eq.my hand and official seal. •. Ss r: yNlaT )commlision expires July 27th, 1983. `r • pU s t\x'; a _ `22k.c.i s_wr zf _ �1 •• •• '.� ,•� Notary Pus ic. ..,f OrVCD� 401 Main Street. Longmont. CO. 80501. Mail future tax notices to: Phillip E. Camenisch. 10504 Weld County Road 7. Longmont, CO. 80501. • 890372 A Att191276S Records< 13 Or $, RE::(, 05912785 52/30/82 J:: 5 ',3.00 5/005 Aye, F 0895 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK A RECORDER WELD CO, CO DAVID CAMENISCH, also known as DAVID E. CAMENISCH, whose address is 3598 Highway 119, Longmont, County of Weld and State of Colorado, and ROBERT CAMENISCH, also known as ROBERT J. CAMENISCH, whoseaddressis 4513 Weld County Road 32, ,olo. Longmont, County of Weld , State of State Documentary Fee pot'• Colorado , for the consideration of SEVENTY— Dote (�Et• NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX b NO/100 --------- $ —• Is CI 1 1 A�, dollars,in hand paid, hereby sell(, and convey{* to 1 , PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH, whose legal address is 10504 Weld County Road 7, Longmont, County of Weld ,and State of Coloradothe following real property in the County of Weld ,and State of Colorado,to wit: An undivided 1/3rd interest in and to the W/ of the SEk of Section 10, in Township 2 North, of Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., together with easement over and across the north 30 feet of the NE1 of the SE1 of said Section 10 for road purposes for ingress and egress to and from the W1 of the SEA of said Section; and together with all ditch and water rights appertaining to said premises, including 2.29 shares of the capital stock of The Rural Ditch Company; also known as street and number (unimproved); with all its appurtenances, and warrant* the title to the same, subject to existing rights of way and easements and lien of the 1982 taxes; and oil and gas leases of record. - Signed this 15th day of Decc r /Ap9 82. bap, Cape.i h, so known as: Camera ch. STATE OF COLORADO, R •e C nie alskaown as; County of Boulder. -- er J. nisch. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day o ,,..,'Decepsber , 19 82, by David Camenisch, also known as David E. CageYQolsEM; fd by Robert Cameniach, also known as Robert J. Camenisch. ".•• contmiss3Otelcpires July 27th, 1983. f i'; i ' r liard itOtt official seal. ' AU O 1. G :0, .>22e.ce c: :C. IAAltd- Marrtirmra •;a2t ices to: Notary Pubtc Phil*1{ >ps Qnde�plLch. 401 Main Street, 10504 'We'yd••Cotinty Road 7, Longmont, CO. 80501. Longmont, CO. 80501. 890372 Na, 811: W.rranty ponies-Sian Form ',•'dtuni Publishing, 5823 W.8th Ave., Laker 1, CO 80214—.13-03) 2,33-78-17900r4== 11 , a AR3'iYp5r?3 n B 1014,--Ta 01948523 11/30/83 14:'-Q $3.00 1/001 n F 1268 Jew ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK 6 ORDER WELD CO, CO DAVID E. CAMENISCH and GLORIA P. QtlfENISCH, e`(� —� V ' ,whose addressis 3598 Highway 119. Longmont (80501) Stott Documentary Fee f 1983,1 • . County of Weld , State of Doty NOV .a. • Colorado. , for the consideration of ONE HONOREE SIXTEEN THOUSAND ($116.000.00) ---- COLORADO dollars.in Band'paid,hereby sell Mr and convey(ets to FEE •'PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH. $11.$11.60 whose legal address is 10504 Weld County Road 7• Longmont (80501) County of Wald ,and State ofColoradoale following real property in the - County of Weld ,and State of Colorado,to wit: • An undivided one-half interest in and to the Ws of the SEA of Section 10. Township 2 North. Range 68 West of the 6th P. M.. together with an easement for road purposes only for ingress and egress over and across the following described property: The north 30 feet of the NElt of the SEt of Section 10. Township 2 North. Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.; and together with all ditch and water rights appertaining to said prestiees. including 2.29 shares of the capital stock of The Rural Ditch Company; RESERVING, HOWEVER, TO THE GRANTORS. a non-exclusive right of way and easement for lateral ditch as now existing from a headgate in the Rural Ditch and running thence northerly to real property lying north of and ad- jaceat to subject property. and a non-exclusive right of way and easement for road adjacent to and vest of said ditch. for ingress and *grass to and ' from said lateral ditch and headgate; • also known as street and number (unimproved) with all its appurtenances, and warrant's) the title to the same, subject to any liens of any taxing districts, existing rights of way and easements signed this 28th day of No Cr , 1 3. ' � `� acreameniech (10 OP act Gloria F. Camenisch � :, .,+.•a�w..;. • STATE OF COLORADO. - -- -- ,_ County of Boulder. j •'S'1vrillregoiysg instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th daye,$f••••'NovRgp r,, , 1983, by DAVID E. CAMENISCH and CLORIA P. CAMBNISCH. • gMyta penjsslo*eecpires July 27th, 1987. e, 9igtic'.lettdesd,offictslseal. `• Ilan rtigni eoterentices Cot �, ``' £ - -- Phillip„ 6.Carnenisch Notary Puhu— c • 10504 Weld County Road 7 401 Main Street. Longmont, CO 80501 Longmont. CO '80301 Ma. aa7. N' 4 Dwi-+aMrt Irw�-::.-.. - .. .:•--'.c=,.-_. ... — wed r..N1sV,.9H M,Ca A.•,.liana*WWI.-On)" W 160 990372 Tc�st�nCI i i tiff tl La _ ratones Inc •n en,.da"ea,ward.O wor.COWS.eon. mon IMP 335-7810 Mr. Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 's Longmont, CO .80501 Subject: A-14400 - Gravel Investigation - Gillispie & Camenisch (Continued) S Camenisch i Yr 1 yY TH 41 0,-1' Course sand l'-10' Course sand 6 gravel 1-1/2" - water at 3' 10'-13' Clayey sand & gravel up to 3" 13'-15' Gravel up to 6"some cobbles (6" or bigger) ' 15'-16' Weather bedrock 16' Olive brown claystone TH #2 0'-1' Clay 1'-6' Course sand & gravel up to 6" - water at 2-1/2' 6'-l0' Clayey course sand & gravel up to 3" 10'-12' Sand & course gravel 1-1/2" 12'-13' Sand & gravel up to 3" 13'-16' Clayey sand & gravel up co 6" 16'-19' Sand & course gravel 1-1/2" 14'-20' Clayey gravel 20'-21' Cobbles 21' Claystone bedrock rock blue TH #3 0'-4' Clay Is'-15' Course sand & gravel up to 6" - water at 2' 15'-17' Silty clayey course gravel 17'-21' Clean sand & course gravel 1-1/2" 21' Claystone bedrock blue TH #4 0'-2' Clay 2'-5' Clean sand & course gravel - water at 2-1/2' 5'-11' Sandy silty gravel up to 3" 11'-12' Sand 12'-17' Silty sand & course gravel 17'-23' Course,sdhd & gravel up to 6" 23' Claystone bedrock blue '"6 8903'72 i Tcstind �I l Laboratories lac. ns sewbaa Owi nd.Nemo,.Ceiwado 007u '^ Mw.4303 3)4.7$6 Mr. Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501_ ._ Subject: A-14400 - Gravel Investigation - Gillispie & Camenisch (Continued) bt/% /QC y Camenisch (Cont'd.) TH #5 0'-7' Sandy clay - water at 2-1/2' 7'-10' Sand & course gravel 10'-13' Sand & gravel up to 3" 13'-20' Silty sandy clay with course gravel 20'-21' Cobbles (6" & bigger) 21'-23' Sand & gravel 23' Olive brown claystone bedrock TH #6 0'-5' Silty clay 5'-7' Silty sand 7'-9' Sandy silty med. gravel 9'-15' Sandy course gravel 15'-17' Gravel up to 3" 17'-19' Sand & course gravel 19'-20' Cobbles 20' Claystone bedrock blue TN 'f7 0'-6' Sandy clay - water at 1' 6'-17' Sandy clayey course gravel up to 3" 17'-20' Gravel up co 6" Zo'-21' Sandy course gravel 21' Olive brown claystone bedrock TH #8 0'-6k' Sandy clay - water at 3' .+ 61S'-11' Course sand & gravel up to 3" 11'-13' Clayey gravel up to 3" 13'-15' Sandy gravel up to 6" • 15'-20' Sandy clayey course gravel up to 3" • • 20'-25' Clean sand & gravel up to 3" 25'-2711' Course sena & gravel 28' Claystone bedrock blue . .7 890372 Q • • la ratonnes Inc. m Stwrottr.eovind.tong/.Cda ado%T7. Taw 0031130.711% Mr. Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO_80501 Subject: A-14400 - Gravel Investigation - Gillispie & Camenisch (Continued) .Et -S !h Camenisch (Cont'd.) TH 49 0'-3' Sandy clay - water 3'-8' Course sand & gravel 8'-10' Sand & gravel up to 3" 10'-14' Clayey sand & gravel up to 3" 14'-17' Clayey sand course gravel 17'-20' Gravel 3 to 6" with cobbles 20'-24' Sand course gravel :4'-30' Clayey sand & course gravel 30' Claystone bedrock blue TN #10 0'-5' Sandy clay - water at 3' S'-9' Clayey sand & course gravel 9'-16' Clean sand & course gravel 16'-23' Sand clay silt course gravel 23'-28' Course sand & gravel up to 3" 28' Claystone bedrock blue TN ,'/i i ti.. L s 0'-111' Clay le-2' Course gravel - water 2'-5' Clay S'-9' Clayey sand course gravel up to 3" 9'-10' Sand 10'-15' Course sand & gravel 15'-22' Clayey sand & gravel up to 6" 22' Clayscone bedrock blue • I• 890372 COLOADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOUF4S 878 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St.,Denver,Colorado 80203 i RECEIVED ✓- PERMIT APPLICATION FORM r DEC 1 5 1931 Application must be complete where ( . IA PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER ow( `twl)dCfs applicable. Type or (.' 1 A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL i SAL alita print in BLACK • FOR: (" )A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP INK.No overstri kes I or erasures unless (7 ) REPLACEMENT FOR NO, - 1 initialed. ( )OTHER '/ WATER COURT CASE NO, ./ fir' e• (1) APPLICANT• mailing address FOR OFFICE U�SSEONNLY: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN NAME !it C ^^-i1{erh, ^r, Receipt No. Illry Q 1n;)nn (-r•t ., ^ocrt "7 STREET r •' . Basin Dist. Conn--,nil r,.i",;;r,ln ....inns CITY awes (zip) WIND(TIONSOF APPROVAL. 1...77n-n7,7This well shall be used in such a way as to cause TELEPHONE NO no material injury to existing water rights. The (2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water County •;}'?•1 right from seeking relief in a civil court action. I•") % of the it's %,Section '" A;: ROVED AS A REPLACEMENT OF WELL Na_. 1' • r•#•e" yr "^LLvU`:T (:EPLi3CGED AND ABANDONED Two. Rng. •) P.M. A`, -3i E r1V•�ED ANT AiiEDtD RULES AND tN,5) )EAy) • ,• .•:V,• :tioNsroct THE _a:.c� `A:•:J UM INSTALLAT(C:1 (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA C•.•�•ratC f O RS, TIC. ENCWSED Ali VV A:aT MUST SZ :>Ui:4:licD WITHIN SIXTY(GO) DAYS AFTER THE Proposed maximum pumping rate(gpm) ill CC:ds7r UCTION CE THE WSW WELL, U GA AFFIRM:NG NIATiABANDONED. WELL)1O.1 2381 O Average annual amount of ground water 1 to be appropriated (acre-feet). ek Tit Ut3YIc .•:"i -14 r e-T..v�� rl%c•�%�-•�)•. Number of acres to be irrigated: - e-'i—I• ... c:c::,p : •,.-••••'•.• ••'' Proposed total depth (feet): Si_"J,, BE: t ^ l�..w:va:.J :�a.� aa•, Aquifer ground water is to be obtained from: ,...../...,r., Owner's well designation . GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR.; ry1��1+ �� / •I HHOUSEHOLD USE ONLY •no irrigation (01 0NDUSTRIAL(5) O ' �ER� S CO1� ( ) LIVESTOCK (2) ( ) IRRIGATION (61 ( 1 COMMERCIAL (4) ( I MUNICIPAL (81 t 1 OTHER (9) APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) (� PERMIT NUMBER 2i�1 S/ A (4) QRIL_I,ER DATE ISSUED 1A 1982 Names ^.)-•i rphr ;•^•••• r 'n„t q-•Ctt M1rr-s-sn! EXPIR ON DATE A 121984 - 511 )•rtrha. '::e:{p^YQR St:Y^:^_C • / ' /7 - Street �SC�/r rj ��,., � pp a.�eZ, 'teNta•n'• Cc7n:.;.,,n onw,r, a (ST En(:MIT 5fR) 89n Can By (..Jn-n... e !C • t A,f•,,. )$,.t.) (4.01 As 1 ,.ant Telephone No. .�t-1^�. tic.No 7 /- ,ar' 1.0. ( • J COUNTYJ. COLORADODIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES • DRM MUST BE SUBMITTED 1313 Sherman Street • Paom 318 I uO DAYS OF COMPLETION Denver, Colorado 80203 ! I WORK DESCRIBED HERE- PE OR PRINT IN SLACK WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT PERMIT NUMBER in OWNER h (. e 1 'hot the '• %of Sec. i i 1 t ".- p r e •, `t4 '; Ch P.M. • inane rs% ftr•t <`' .i7 'nC'^C^Cf ret "5"1. 7. ? —.�. R. ;ESA ' COMPLETED \el T '' , `3 • 19 41 HOLE DIAMETER II : 'I'7 ft.in.from to WELL LOG Water _^in,horn co ft. n To Type and Color of Material toe. — in.from to ft. DRILLING METHOn ' i Z15 naveur+!enot CASING RECORD: Plain Casing 97 bluo the le Sizet '/7" kind —��—from to ft. Size.___& kind from to ft. Size _& kind _from to ft. Perforated Casing f• 5/F4 r`ttet from .7 to ?7 ft. Size—& kind Size _& kind from to ft. ! Size_& kind from to ft. GROUTING RECORD !rT int Material 4 P.' Intervals Placement Method GRAVEL PACK: Site Interval TEST DATA �� :1 ::ot••::-::= 19 Date Tester no Static Water Level Prior to Test ft. ,.:J.! Type of Test Pump ' I.? Length of Test ...., Sustained Yield (Metered) TOTAL DEPTH Final Pumping Water Level Use additional pages necessary to complete log. 8903'72 . • • . COLOR.? DIVISION OF WATER RESOOCES tie; C' 13 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman 5t. iL�(7, INF.( • . c:P'. Cr .C' E 5 Denver, Colorado 30203 5rs:E.•E\T .AILED ON iiE=UE5r. STATE OF COLORADO f AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF ` 55. • STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL USE OF GROUND WATER AMENDMENT OF EXISTING RECORD r, LATE REGISTRATION PERMIT NUMBER LOCATION OF WELL THE AFFIANT(S) ::,11 Camen3sch Cihooy weld whose moiling address is I^.2. '3 O3uncv Road 4 •N.1 .el the Ct. 5a••e•• In City Lc-_r..3r._ Co lerade 805% To. 2 N Rat. 68 _ a 6t5 PM rs-..cr we, �..ar. r Tyr• —_ being duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says that he (they) is (are) the owner(s) of the well described hereon; the well is located as described above, at distances of 2300 feet from the South section line and 15' feet from the ta...e. ,9.._l u•eSt _ section line; water from this well was first applied to a benef(clot use for the purposes) described herein or, the , tr.'', es .r stt day of , 19 50 ; the maximum sustained pumping rote of the well is 10 gallons per minute, the pumping rote clamed hereby is - In gallons per minute; the total depth of the well ;s 25 feet; the average annual amount of water to be diverted is 1 acre-feet; for which claim is hereby mode far PouvzIl.Old use ants purpose(s); the legal description of the land on which the water from this well Is used is N Of the a':k. sec 10, tvp 2N, ref 63W, 6th PM of which O acres ore irrigated and which is illustrated on the mop on the reverse side of this form; that this well was completed in compliance with the permit approved therefor; this statement of beneficibl use of ground water is filed in compliance with tow; he - (they) has (have) read the statements made hereon; knows the content thereof; and that the some ore true o1 his (their) knowledge. _ (COMPLETE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM) Signatures) Subscribed and sworn FOR OFFICE USE ONLY to before me on this day of , 19_ - Cev.r Cos.' Ne. My Commission expires: tsr•.r Pr;H. Me. Day y. .. ... ....t< - 0;.. =ty. ACCEPTED FOR FILING BY THE STATE ENGINEER OF COLORADO PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: see. %. --- % -- h ..0 us. D,sc __a ea at MM G.. ... 890372 • • March 16, 1987 Phillip E. Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Dear Mr. Camenisch: Your petition for inclusion of your property has been approved by the St. Vrain Sanitation District subject to execution of the enclosed Inclusion Agreement. Please fill in the amount of your assessed valuation* and multiply that amount by 0.0165 (the District's mill levy oar the 1986 taxable year is 16.5 mills). The resulting figure is the amount of taxes your property would have been assessed had the property been included in time to be taxed for the 1986 tax year. Please return the executed Agreement and your check for the calculated amount by April 15 to: St. Vrain Sanitation District c/o Wally Grant P.O. Box 978 Longmont, CO 80501 Yours very truly, • - BOARD OF DIRECTORS ST. YRAIN SANITATION DISTRICT RNL:bs SAINTINC14 Enclosures *This figure can be obtained from your tax notice. Do not confuse with "actual value." 890372 Ocki ,== .;;_==== November 10, 1987 • Mrs. Phil Camenisch 10504 WCR 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mrs. Camenisch: 1 would like to confirm that natural gas service is available along Weld County Road 7 adjacent to your property_ Service off our main would be subject to our rules and regulations. We presently have enough capacity in existing mains to serve this area. Sincerely, Darrell Hartigan Distiict Manager DH/cf 890372 . .. .tip♦ ... „931%i ti . f !...:r.v-,67•• • UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 929 (303)659.0561 Brighton,Colorado 80601 ENTERPRISE 222 November 5, 1987 Mr. Phil Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Camenisch: The area in the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West is within the service territory of Union Rural Electric Association. It is my understanding that you may be selling the dairy and house. Union will continue to supply the electricity to both the existing accounts and to any new meters connected at the site. If you have any questions or I can be of any assistance, please call me. Sincerely, UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. .A Dorthy Ruggles, Supervisor Engineering Support Services J'h • 89®372 "A Consumer-Owned Utility Serving Five Front Range Colorado Counties- 1 La.. • • - i.I. Post Office Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210 - e JI uaaw t. (303) 632-2188, Metro (303) 443.2036 November 12, 1987 Philip E. Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 - Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Meter Number 90 52 5 52 Dear Mr. Camenisch: The Board of Directors has approved your request to convert your 1" meter to 3/4" x 5/8" meters, per my recommendations on the exclosed analysis. Only two 3/4" x 5/8" meters can be allowed in place of the 1" meter. You will need to pay the cost to install the new taps and disconnect the old, but this can be done when you want the work done. Please call if I can provide any further assistance. Sincerely, :„.11)//fir 4.. Terri Magnuson - Company Engineer - TM/rr enclosure 890372 • • • ANALYSIS OF PHIL CAMINISCH REQUEST TO CONVERT 1 INCH METER TO 5/8 INCH METERS Membership - Number 90 52 5 82 HEM This was originally a 3/4" tap. A second membership was purchased in 1969 to cover usage of over 100,000 gallons per month. In 1975, at customer's request, a 1" tap and meter was installed. The original 3/4" tap was disconnected. No additional memberships were purchased, and the customer currently still has a 1•• meter with two memberships. RECOMMENDATIONS Meter size Maximum flow in GPM 5/8" X 3/4" 20 3/4" 30 1" 50 This is in the Del Camino area, where we are at capacity. Any changes approved must not increase the total demand on the system. I recommend we allow two 5/8" x 3/4" meters to be substituted for the 1" meter, The customer has enough memberships (2), to cover this. The customer should pay the cost of material and labor to set the two new pits and disconnect the old 1" tap. Estimated cost: $800. - $1,000. 890.' 72 • a i 1 I 1 PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH 1 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colordo 80501 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 890372 I m r March 16, 1988 1 ' Chairman, Mined Land Reclamation Board Centennial Building, Room 423 1313 Sherman Street ' Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: Phillip E. Camenisch Camenisch Pit Permit Application Dear Chairman: Phillip E. Camenisch is pleased to submit the attached 112 Permit Application for your consideration. This request is for a 15 to 20 year sand and gravel operation on a 240 acre site, one-quarter mile west of Interstate 25 and one mile south of State Highway 119, in Weld County. A number of similar operations are ongoing in the immediate vicinity. We intend to commence mining operations at the proposed site upon your approval of this application. Background information on the nature of the site and proposed Mining and ' Reclamation Plans are presented. We hope this application meets with your approval . Please contact me if you have any questions or would like additional information. Sincerely, /HZ te4 ' Phillip E. Camenisch 772-0797 1 1 1 ' 890372 J I ' REGULAR (112) PERMIT APPLICATION FORM - IThis form contains two major parts: (1 ) General Operation Information and (2) Exhibits A-P. When you submit your application, be sure to include four signed copies of the I General Operation Information. four copies of Exhibits A-P, and a check for the application fee described under (4) below. To expedite processing, please provide the information in the format and order described in this form. ' GENERAL OPERATION INFORMATION Type or print clearly. in the space provided, all information described below. 1. Applicant/Operator Name: Phillip E. Camenisch I2. Operation Name (Pit, mine or site name): Camenisch Pit 3. Application type: Regular (112) Permit Operation. 4. Application Fee for Permitted Acreage* 240 permitted acres. ($50.00 + $15.00/acre, 1st. 50 acres; I $10.00/acre. 2nd. 50 acres; $5.00/acre. 3rd. 50 acres; 51 .00/acre, any additional acreage; maximum fee of $2.000.00).* 1 Note permitted acreage and application fee and attach a check for this amount when you file. 41 _A4n_no application fee. 5. Substance(S) to be mined (e.g. , gold/silver/gravel ): Sand and Gravel , I6. Owners(s) of Substance to be Mined (check applicable box(s)): e) Private ❑ State ❑ Federal ❑ Indian 7. Owner(s) of Record of Affected Land (check applicable box(s)): al Private ❑ State ❑ Federal ❑ Indian I 8. Type of Mining Operation (check applicable box(s)): OD Surface ❑ Underground ❑ In-situ I 9. Location Information. The center of the area where the majority of mining will occur lies in: COUNTY: Weld . I PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN (check one) : ❑ 6th (Colorado) 0 10th (New Mexico)O Ute TOWNSHIP (write number and check direction): T 2 $ North 0 South RANGE (write number and check direction): R 68 ❑ East O West SECTION (write number): S 3,0 QUARTER SECTION (check one) : ❑ NE ❑ NW ❑ SE lac SW QUARTER/QUARTER SECTION (check one): ❑ NE $ NW 0 SE k SW I GENERAL DESCRIPTION: (miles and direction one and ope-hlf miles southwest of from nearest town and approximate elevation) Del Camino. Approx. elev. - 4860 feet. ' * If the operator is a unit of State or county government. an application fee is not _ required. A fraction of an acre must be counted as one acre for fee calculation. I 890372 I Il -2- II10. Correspondance Information 1 APPLICANT/OPERATOR (name, address, and phone of name to be used on permit) Individual 's Name: Phillip E. Camfnitth 1 Company Name: Phillip F_ CamPnicrh Street 10504 Weld County Road 7 City: Longmont IIState: rn Zip Code: ;Ingot Area Code: 303 Telephone: 772-0797 IPERMITTING CONTACT (if different from applicant/operator above) Individual 's Name: 1 Company Name: Street: II City: State: Zip Code: Area Code: Telephone: llINSPECTION CONTACT (if different from applicant/operator above) Individual 's Name: llCompany Name: Street: 1 City: State: Zip Code: Area Code: Telephone: Il 11 . Primary future 0 Cropland(CR) 0 Pastureland(PL) fib( General Agriculture(GA) II land use 0 Rangeland(RL) 0 Forestry(FR) ❑ Wildlife Habitat(WL) (check one): 0 Residential(RS)0 Recreation(RC) 0 Industrial/Commercial (IC) 0 Developed Water Resources(WR) ❑ Solid Waste Disposal(WD) II 12. Primary present ❑ Cropland(CR) ❑ Pastureland(PL) la General Agriculture(GA) land use ❑ Rangeland(RL) ❑ Forestry(FR) C) Wildlife Habitat(WL) (check one): ❑ Residential(RS) ❑ Recreation(RC) ❑ Industrial/Commercial (IC) ' 0 Developed Water Resources(WR) To the best of my knowledge, all the information presented on this application form and ' the attached Exhibits A-P are true and correct (must be signed by applicant/operator). Date: 3/16/88 9y: . ' C., ,s ,ter, Owner I title a 890372 1 1 Table of Contents Pace Cover Letter Exhibit A - Legal Description 1 Exhibit 8 - Index Map - sheet 1 of 2 in map pocket Exhibit C - Pre-mining and Mining Plan Maps - sheet 1 of 2 in map pocket Exhibit D - Mining Plan 2 ' Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan 8 Exhibit F - Reclamation Plan Map - sheet 2 of 2 in map pocket Exhibit G - Water Information 13 Evaluation for County Flood Hazard Permit Exhibit H - Wildlife Information 16 Exhibit I - Soils Information 18 ' Exhibit J - Vegetation Information 22 Exhibit R .- Climate Information 23 ' Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs 24 Exhibit M - Compliance with local Zoning 26 Exhibit N - Other Permits or Licenses 26 Exhibit 0 - Source of Legal Right to Enter 26 ' Exhibit P - Owners of Record of Surface and 26 Subsurface Rights Immediately Adjacent Landowners 27 1 1 890372 i Exhibit A Legal Description and Location ' The legal description of the site is as follows: 1 SW 1/4 and W 1/2. SE 1/4, S 10, T 2 N. R 68 W, of 6 th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. I Exhibit B ' Index Map ' The proposed operation is located southwest of the ' Junction of I-25 and Colorado Highway 119 in Weld County, Colorado. The site Is most easily accessed by traveling west on SH 119 from the Junction for approximately 1 .1 miles to Weld County Road No. 7, then south for 1 .0 miles. The Index/Vicinity Map, Exhibit B, is shown on Sheet 1 of 2. which Is enclosed in a map pocket at the end of this application. 1 ' Exhibit C Pre-mining and Mining Plan Maps The Pre- mining and Mining Plan Maps appear on sheet 1 of 2, in a pocket at the back of this application. 1 Page 1 890372 1 e • Exhibit D Mining Plan Introduction The site is bound by agricultural lands on the south; ' Weld County Road 7, a pond and a mining operation on the west ; another mining operation and agricultural land on the ' north of the site; and, Interstate 25 one-quarter mile to the east . A trailer park Is located adjacent to the northeast corner of the permit boundary. Two homes and a ' dairy operation occupy the property, as well as an irrigation ditch and a gas facility. The proposed mining operation is estimated to generate ' 350.000 to 400 ,000 tons of aggregate materials per year over a 15 to 20 year period. The operation includes plans for a concrete and/or an asphalt batch plant . All proposed plans ' for mining and reclamation are presented In detail In the following segments of this application. Mining is divided ' into five phases which are depicted on the Mining Plan Map, Sheet 1 of 2, enclosed in a pocket at the end of the eapplication . The present and proposed post-mining land use of the ' site is genera) agriculture. The landowner presently lives In one of the houses on site, operates the dairy farm, and farms a portion of the land in Phase III of the •Mine Plan. Farming will probably continue until mining operations near ' completion. Phase V of the mine plan includes removing the two houses and dairy farm from the property, and mining the land upon which the dairy is located. However, it is possible ' that either or both of the houses might not be removed as a part of the mine plan . Operations will finish with mining Page 2 890372 1 the processing plant/pond area. and possibly a portion of the potential batch plant and material stockpile area. 1 During Phases I and II of operations. Idaho Creek will be rerouted along the west and north property lines. Plans for the watercourse alterations have been prepared by a Certified Professional Engineer and are presented in Exhibit G. The Reclamation Plan includes leaving a pond with revegetated shoreline on much of the western portion of the property. The eastern most approximately 40 acres of the ' site will be backfliled, graded to a near level condition, and revegetated. ' The proposed post-mining land use of all lands is also general agricultural . Mine Plan 1 The land areas upon which the plant site and the potential batch plant are to be located will be elevated to 2 or 3 feet above the existing ground elevation to insure ground stability of the plant site and to protect the site from potential flooding. Material used to elevate the plant will be overburden salvaged during Phase I . ' All topsoil will be stripped with scrapers and/or end loaders, and stockpiled or directly redistributed on the 1 pond shoreline during reclamation . Topsoil will be temporarily stockpiled near the area undergoing ' mining/reclamation . Volumes of soil to be salvaged are discussed in Exhibit I , Soils Information. Aggregate will be excavated with loaders, dozers. and/or scrapers and hauled to the plant for processing. Equipment to be used at the plant includes a crusher, Page 3 890372 1 i screens, conveyors and stackers, as well as the potential batch plant and/or asphalt plant . Dewatering will take place prior to mining land parcels within each phase of the operation . Water will be ' discharged Into Idaho Creek in accordance with the NPDES permit to be obtained. A wash plant will be set-up as indicated on the Mining Plan Map. Accumulated sediment , which is expected to be minimal , will be replaced at the bottom of the area undergoing backfilling or mixed with the overburden to be backfilled. Water requirements of the wash plant are discussed in Exhibit G. During Phase I of mining, approximately 1250 feet of Idaho Creek will be realigned and Improved. Complete _ ' relocation of Idaho Creek will take place prior to excavation of Phase II . The creek is to be rerouted along ' the west and north property lines as shown on the Mining and Reclamation Plan Maps. Refer to Exhibit G, Water Information, for a detailed discussion of the Idaho Creek relocation and improvement plans. ' The pond shoreline will be created commensurate with mining progress. Shoreline will be cut and sloped as required by rule 116 ( 1 ) F and discussed in the Reclamation Plan. The shoreline will not be mined and backfilled because of the lack of sufficient quantities of backfill ' material to recreate the shoreline. ' The size of an area to be mined at any one time will be a maximum of 15 acres. Disturbances associated with operations are classified as follows: 1 ' Page 4 890372 1 tiaUsw_Dlaturbancml Excavation - Approximately 15 acres will be undergoing excavation activity at any one time. This 15 acres, which will progress throughout the property during the life of the - operation , will be reclaimed as surface water. Stockpile Area - The materials stockpile area will ' occupy 4. 13 acres as shown on the Mining Plan Map. 1145yerate DISjr22islL.c _ Shoreline - Approximately 1200 lineal feet of shoreline will be established the first year and about 540 lineal feet each year thereafter. At a 20 foot width, from surrounding - ground area to water line, .55 acres of shoreline will be established the first year and .25 acres each year thereafter. Reclamation of this disturbance Includes topsoil redistribution and revegetatlon. The total final shoreline land area is estimated to be 5.0 acres. Processing Facilities - The plant and settling pond area will occupy 12.4 acres and the possible future batch and/or asphalt plant area would occupy 4. 13 areas. The ' stockpile area will occupy an additional approximately 4.13 acres. The scalehouse will be located alongside the road within the material stockpile area. I i - 1 Page 5 890372 1 i • Total operations processing facilities will encompass approximately 20 acres as shown on the Mining Plan Map and delineated below: Acres Plant Area 5.37 ' Pond Area 7.02 Material Stockpile Area 4. 13 oOpen Area/Possible Batch Plant 4. 13 Total 20.65 Minor Disturhnnce tShoreline - Approximately one acre of shoreline will be ready for reseeding at any one time. Timetable - Approximately 15 acres will be mined with ' contemporaneous shoreline reclamation per year. This 15 acres includes .25 acres of shoreline reclamation and about 10 acres to remain as surface water , per year. Results of test borings indicate mining will range from O 16 to 30 feet deep and average approximately 18 to 19 feet In depth . All test holes indicated that water is encountered between 1 and 3 feet below the ground surface. ' The nature of the stratum immediately beneath the material to be mined Is comprised of unconsolidated surflcial deposits, mainly alluvium. 1 1 Page 6 890372 1 1 Concrete and/or Asphal t Bch P1 ant If a concrete and/or asphalt batch plant is Incorporated into the mining operation , It would be located ' at the southwest corner of the permit area as shown on the Mining Plan Map. Concrete and/or asphalt batch plants fall under Jurisdiction of the State Department of Health. E.P.A. , and Weld County . The concrete and/or asphalt plant would operate in compliance with these jurisdictional agencies and will not be set up until approval from each is granted. Activation of either or both plants would not change ' the cost of reclamation and no financial warranty adjustment would be necessary. The concrete and/or asphalt plant location will be ripped, scarified, and revegetated, as will the rest of the plant site area. 1 As required by the County, there will be a 20 foot setback on the entire permit boundary perimeter. In ' addition , there will he a 50 foot setback around the gas facilities and a 50 foot setback on both sides of the Rural Ditch , as shown on the Mining Plan Map. Mining the area east of the Rural Ditch will require crossing the ditch . The ditch will be crossed at established culvert crossings located near the north and south permit boundaries. As discussed in Exhibit G, Water Information, the Rural Ditch will not be affected by this operation. 1 Page 7 890372 I 1 Exhibit E Reclamation Plan Presently the landowner practices general agricultural activities on the proposed mine site and intends to do so throughout mining and upon the completion of mining. Phillip E. Camenisch has chosen to reclaim much of the site as surface water with revegetated shoreline. As indicated previously, the land area east of the Rural Ditch will be backfilled, level graded and revegetated. The results of these reclamation activities are shown on ' Sheet 2 of 2, the Reclamation Plan Map, which is enclosed in a pocket at the end of the application. ' In cooperation with the property owners north of the permit boundary, there is a potential for the combined land areas to be developed as an expansion of the existing dairy farm to the north . The reclamation plan would provide ' additional pasture and a watering site for livestock. t It is also possible that 15 to 20 years from now, the land area east of the Rural Ditch, approximately 40 acres, would be developed as a part of the commercially zoned ' property bordering the east permit boundary. Or, the 40 acres could he developed as an extension of the existing ' trailer park at the northeast corner of the permit boundary_ Other land uses surrounding the site are mainly ' agricultural and mining operations in which ponds have been or will be established as pacts of the reclamation plans. tThe post-mining land use of this operation, a pond with revegetated shoreline, is compatible with the existing and ' proposed future land uses in the vicinity. Page 6 890372 1 Implementation of the reclamation plan as it relates to topsolling, grading, revegetation and the applicable ' performance standards of Rule 6 is discussed in the following sections. ' Grading ' As discussed in the mining plan , the pond shoreline will he created commensurate with mining progress. ' Shoreline will be cut and graded, as the adjacent area is being excavated, rather than mining, backfilling and grading to recreate a shoreline. This will greatly reduce reclamation costs and insure shoreline stability. ' Shoreline will be created by grading at a 3(H) : 1(V) slope from S feet above to 10 feet below the expected water line. At that point , a grade no steeper than 2(11) : 1(V) will ' be established to the bottom of the pond. The Reclamation Plan Map illustrates a general , approximated pond and shoreline. The final shape of the ' pond may be different than that shown shown on the map. The 40 acres east of the Rural Ditch will be mined and 1 backfllled to a near level condition. The entire 40 acres will not be backfllled and graded at one time. Backfilling will be on a continuous basis as mining progresses through this phase. Accumulated waste material generated during the other phases of operations and the actual overburden on this 40 'acres will be used for backfill material . Overburden availability Is discussed in Exhibit I , Soils Information. ' Upon final reclamation, this land area will be approximately the same elevation as the surrounding land area. ' Page 9 890372 1 - Tapa41_i_Las As mining progresses, topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled for redistribution on the shoreline during that phase of reclamation. Temporary stockpiling will be necessary. Topsoil that remains stockpiled for more than one growing season will be sloped 3<H) : 1(V) and seeded with a fast growing vegetative cover to minimize wind and water erosion. eTopsoil stockpiles will be stored near the area undergoing mining/reclamation and will be free from disturbance by ongoing operations. Once stockpiled, the topsoil will be handled as little as possible until replacement . Topsoil will be replaced at a depth of 3 to 9 Inches ' on all areas to be revegetated, and will be redistributed in such a manner to provide optimum tllth for seed application. 1 Fertilizer, mulch , or other soil amendments will be added in quantities determined necessary after analysis of composite soil samples. Peveaetat1oa The shoreline, the east 40 acres, and all disturbed areas (with the exception of the pond surface) will be revegetated. ' Seeding will take place 1n the late fall or early spring to ensure maximum advantage for moisture when germination occurs. 1 1 Page 10 890372 1 1 1 • The following seed mix is proposed to ensure the greatest probability of success and is based on environmental and biological factors common to the site. Drill seeded * 1 Saeciss us PLS/acre $e Wsa ft western wheatgrass 4.0 10. 1 tall wheatgrass 5.6 10 .2 1 switchgrass 1 . 1 9.8 alkali sacaton .25 10.0 1 sand bluestream 24.0 � 10 . American vetch 1 * If broadcast seeded, the amounts will be doubled. 1 Weed control will be implemented if weeds become a significant percentage (30 percent or greater) of the plant 1 community. If mechanical weed control proves Inadequate, chemical control as recommended by a recognized agency or Institution (ie. , Soil Conservation Service, Agricultural 1 Extension Service, etc. ) will be used as long as the recommendation conforms to state and federal laws. 1 This revegetation plan will establish a diverse, long lasting vegetation cover that is capable of 1 self-regeneration without continued dependence on Irrigation , soil amendments or fertilizer. 1 Implementation of this reclamation plan and procedures 1 will provide a stabilized land area and ponds with properly sloped and stabilized shorelines for the intended post-mining land use. 1 1 1 1 1 Page 11 890372 1 1 1 Exhibit F ' Reclamation Plan Map 1 The Reclamation Plan Map Is on Sheet 2 of 2 In a pocket at the back of the application. 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 12 890372 1 ' • Exhibit G Water Information • O The Pre-Mining Plan Map shows the locations of Idaho Creek; irrigation ditches, and stockwater ponds on site. ' Each parcel of land undergoing mining will be dewatered into Idaho Creek . An NPDES Permit application is in preparation for submittal to the Colorado Department of Health at this time. Idaho Creek will be rerouted along the west and north property lines as shown on the Reclamation Plan Map. Plans for the watercourse alteration have been prepared by a Certified Professional Engineer and are presented at the end of this Exhibit G. As indicated previously, the water table ranges from 1 1 to 3 feet below the ground surface throughout the site. Thus, dust suppression requirements will be minimal . • Approximately 2000 gallons per day will be used for haul road dust suppression . Based on operating 200 days per year, the water requirement will be approximately 1 .2 acre feet per year. Water for gravel washing will be recycled. The wash plant is Illustrated on the Mining Plan Map. There will be ' four ponds with 30 foot wide berms separating each pond. Approximately 1600 gallons per minute Cgpm) will be used ' during washing. At the Weld County Corporation's ongoing, nearby operation, approximately one percent of the wash water is lost due to evaporation. Operations of 8 hours a day, 200 days per year, will require approximately 4.7 acre feet of make-up water per year for the wash plant . Page 13 890372 1 1 The total water requirement for normal operations will be 5.9 acre feet per year. In the event that an asphalt 1 and/or concrete batch plant is put Into operation, additional water would be required. More than an adequate ' supply of water, perhaps as much as 35 acre feet , is available for use in this operation. The exact quantities and adjudicated uses of the water rights are presently being determined. Documentation of water availability to supply the project water requirements will be forwarded when ' available. The Rural Ditch which runs through the property will ' not be affected by the operation . Excavation activity will come no closer than 50 feet on either side of the ditch . ' All permitted and adjudicated wells in the vicinity of the proposed operation are shown on Figure G-1 and are listed on Table G-1 . Four wells are within 1000 feet of the mine site, three of which are outside the permit boundary. Experience with other similar activities in the immediate area indicates that the depression cones created by dewatering the pit will not reach the wells. The landowner. whose well Is on the property and Is therefore most likely to be affected, is aware of the conditions and will take responsibility In dealing with or mitigating any affects to ' his well which might result from the dewatering operation. Disturbance to the hydrologic balance will be minimized by: 1 ) compliance with applicable Colorado Water Laws and Regulations governing injury to existing water rights; 2) compliance with applicable Federal and Colorado water quality laws and regulations: 3) compliance with applicable Federal and Colorado Dredge and Fill Requirements. ( It is not anticipated that dredge Page 14 890372 I I Iand fill requirements will be applicable to this operation, because of the diminutive nature of Idaho Creek. > I Table G-1 IWell Number Owner ltoth(ft) I * 1 . 1-62-006744F Camenlsch, J.P. 15 3200 1 2. 1-62-037712 Cowling, Leroy 22 30 3. 1-62-040595 Messenger, Cecil 22 20 1 4. 1-62-000282 Wolfkill , L.C. 700 20 5. 04495 Engelhard. William 30 10 I - 6. 1-62-017939 Heaton, Anthony 30 30 7. Y-62-034027 Temperature Processing Co. Engelhard, William 30 20 1 8. 1-62-040549 Dagget, Ronald H. 62 3 9. 1-62-040813 Dagget , Ronald H. 104 4 I10. 1-62-057210 Bowman, James 0. & 24 5 Cleo E. 1 11 . 107118-A Larson, Dorothy 100 100 12. 123810-A Camenisch, Phil 27 30 I (N Numbers along the left margin are correlated to Figure G-1 . ) 1 A portion of the Weld County Floodprone district, FP-1 , runs through the site as shown on the Mining Plan Map. The IWeld County Flood Hazard Development Permit follows this Exhibit . I I • 890372 IPage 15 .l t ' --rii-:A-v7s- , ,H7 - 1,4 1 ( .. 'i , ISC, . / L4181.217.:::...t---_,-- - . -.7"):4-4-: I idij kr-) /Li— ') . •,,N\• 'LI' - - _ III) I __ L.ri A Ilye I..-°-.....\Cr �- II 441 �z+ 1.25 ale' I " *:::- . .:i:: :# ....:.: ' ... 4._ I ii . in______a:, .. 1 _ • .' l4 ::::e::::: :i: . I '11: ' Permit 1i; _ ` i Boundary ,: : G—/— ' tip /• :0:,: x.:.: j}v7:•: :::::::::005: :::::::::::- ifik,' `a\ I , ••••• ••.: I AN I - (\ p� lk %.\_.r.. .f . arwrl Plt••F.�J �� ,� ., �� r °`.'- 1 Ki, rJlc'. Ii I-25 wit\ ( ‘) ) 1 Nan I . From:U.S.G.S TS Ouod{Gowondo a Longmont" Scala- I"+ 2000' I 0 —WELL LOCATION G-I WELLS IN VICINITY I NUMBER ON MAP PERMIT NUMBER NUMBER ON MAP PERMIT NUMBER - I 6744F 7 34027 I 2 37712 8 40549 3 40595 9 40813 4 00282 10 57210 - 1 5 04495 II 890372 137118 A 6 17939 12 123810-A I I I _ I STEFFEN ROBERTSON AND KIRSTEN ConsuiGng Engineers October 30, 1986 ' Project No. 10402 ' Weld County ' Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: FLOOD HAZARD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT- PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH To Whom It May Concern, ' The attached memorandum has been prepared to meet the requirement of a Flood Hazard Development Permit application for rechannalization of Idaho Creek and the placement. of a fill terrace within the property limits of Phillip E. Camenisch sand and -gravel pit. Yours truly, STEFFEN ROBERTSON AND KIRSTEN COLORADO) INC. Rob Dorey RD/dkh 1 Attachment w,;:i;,rgAs..:rh r1 • 1 3232 south Vance Street.Suite 210.Lakewood.Colorado 80227.U.SA 89®3'72 Tel.(303)985.1333 Telex 363599 SRK USA Facsimile(303)985.9947 Other citices is USA,Canada.United Kingdom and Atka 1 1 MEMORANDUM PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH FLOOD HAZARD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TECHNICAL SUPPORT ' INTRODUCTION iPhillip E. Camenisch is proposing the development of a sand and gravel mining operation in Section 10, T2N R68W, Weld County, Colorado. The material deposit to be developed is partially within the limits of the 100-yr floodplain boundary of Boulder Creek. The property is also transected by Idaho Creek. This creek has been previously realigned and channelized and forms part of the local farmland irrigation network. Realignment of Idaho Creek will be performed prior to and during project operation. This document describes the evaluation of the flood stage and the proposed rechannelization ' of Idaho Creek in the vicinity of the project. The data contained herein is given as the technical support required for the Weld County Flood Hazard Development Permit. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' The development of the sand and gravel operation will consist of the progressive excavation and processing on the property shown on Figure 1. Prior to development, the Idaho Creek stream channel will be rechannelized ' from the point of crossing the property boundary northwards parallel to County Road 7. Initially, realignment would proceed to a point approximately 1,250 ft ' north at which point the channel would discharge back into the existing creek. Subsequently, after approximately five years of operation, the channel would ' be extended north to the north property line and from that point east to the existing creek (Figure 1). Excavation of the sand and gravel will commence with the development of a dewatering cut to the fill pit depth. The pit is planned to average 18 ft in depth. Water collected in the dewatering cut would then be pumped and discharged into Idaho Creek. Pumping capacity will be sized at 500 gpm, 1 890372 /•-; i.:-.— 1 • t". ,... -':. i If I , • ; tN ` J;'" i I .i I rd✓ �s-_• ,' �-n vim- 2 e • • (#14‘...••:04 w$ i j 25 ail I 47 : _ r \ • \, Q , c • e �� '' tr...' n PROPERTY, p O U • T..Ner - •. :n f ..r:=• i •.7 • t. BOUNDARY V Ito.," •• 7 ., j ...its,. `' G tA —~ — 9 tic16 j. :A STAGE 2 : -- „/ i °4° ' I ' RECHANNELIZATION �'1 \a %�o % s�° ISTAGE 1 t 71 i• o RECHANNELIZATIONI . ' I -• I :w !.' / ©, a PROPOSED— • b c. o.::.• ;�` -\ PLANT SITES i nT'L% \ ;e : ' �/ 1galb • 16.wan/ 15 <,) ▪ ,. 16 . ,pt, cif I? may` I r--H. ., . .. .. e0 1000 2000 4000 6000 FEET ~Lres I 10 FT.00NT0UR INTERVAL *PROJECT No. FIGURE 1 a 10402 - I DATE STEFFEN ROBERTSON & BOASTER 10/66 commons, Enoh••r• PHILLIP E. CAMENISCH REVISION V SITE LOCATION MAP I 0 ' .y All 8903r�12 • - ' I a 1 1 maximum. This rate is based upon inflow to similar pits in the vicinity of the proposed workings. Figure 2 shows a typical section of the construction along the perimeter of the property. It is also proposed to construct a plant area along the south boundary of the property. This plant area will consist of a level area of ground upon which gravel processing equipment will be placed. IDAHO CREEK RECHANNELIZATION The existing stream channel will be diverted into a culvert structure at ' the south property boundary. The southwest corner will provide the primary access to the property which will consist of an 80-ft wide access roadway. The existing culvert at this location is a 36-inch corrugated metal, half oval. A 36-inch corrugated metal pipe will be installed beneath the proposed access road. 1 The creek channel_ is currently approximately two-ft wide and up to 12-inches deep. The gradient of the channel is nominal and flow meanders within a poorly defined channel bottom. The channel contains silt and debris ' and supports grasses and wet vegetation. Flow in the channel is controlled approximately one mile upstream by a gate on the Rural Ditch. Estimated flow capacity of the current channel is a maximum of approximately 2.5 cfs. The proposed channel will be constructed to be approximately 10-ft wide ' and one-ft deep. The flow capacity of the channel will far exceed that of the existing creek and will safely conduct stream flow and the water produced in 1 the dewatering trench. For a three-inch flow depth, the channel capacity will be in excess of 5 cfs with a velocity of less than 2 fps. A typical channel section is also given on Figure 2. t At any and all crossings of the rechannelized Idaho Creek, the stream flow will be directed into a culvert with concrete wing walls and aprons. A minimum diameter of 36 inches is proposed for the culverts. 1 890372 a - - a a a a s - a s a a a e a a a I \ COUNTY RECHAHNELIZED S ROAD No. 7 IDAHO CREEK D£WATERING TRENCH POWER LINE ff 4-20' S '-31 1 I - �V.-- -- �r 1 J I PERIMETER BERM N EXISTING CREEK j 2:1 MAX. SLOPEI FOR RECLAMATION TYPICAL SECTION - ICHANNEL N.T.S. 10' 1 t` I11 �1 4' l TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTION FOR IDAHO CREEK N.T.S. 4.PROJECT No FIGURE 2 a 0 10402 DATE .��... 10/88 (:=-\ e=3 STEfFEN ROBERTSON i KIRSTEH SCHEMATIC OF TYPICAL WORK STEFF iN EnylnTSia REVISION AT PERIMETER OF PROPERTY r + D ej. 1 1 FLOOD STAGE 1 The flood stage was obtained from maps produced by Weld County in ' cooperation with the Colorado Water Conservation Board; "St. Vrain River and Boulder and Idaho Creeks Del Camino Area sheet 4 of 10. This map (Figure 3) 1 indicates that the 100-yr flood stage at the location of the proposed plant facility is approximately at elevation 4,859. Fill to produce a level above ' the 100-yr flood stage will be placed in a small portion of the plant site below this elevation. The elevation of the fill will be to a minimum of 4,860 ft. This limited amount of fill is not anticipated to cause any detectable increase in the 100-yr flood stage. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 890372 I 1 c t k - AV iff----/ ..KA., \--%-) • ..� ' �. , �_ ~mil _r>-) I lrf' I 0 Ili raso ......noo \/,,, '�V �'��.�.� � 100 YR. FLOOD ►�Ir ��.�.,��'� ., LEVEL I -� -' 11 r �-S PROPERTY BOUNDARY / :/ . J IP OPOSED ^ ^ 14(13 --___.../ P ANT SITES / f , . I : : %. ;: /i 1ell_ ( )6 /O' Cl) so 7 1 ‘....-- 0 0 ' ' a- , �--1 ki ce, ........ _, ./ cc , Z I rah`_--4A I0 200 400 800 1.200 FEET I 2 FT.CONTOUR INTERVAL PROJECT No. FIGURE 3 ilk 10402 I AREA OF 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN DATE STEFFEN.nOBERTSON & KIRSTEN FOR IDAHO CREEK IN THE DEL 10/86 Consulting e•oI•••'+ - CAMINO AREA AFTER KUCERA REVISION ' & ASSOCIATES. 1977 S or 890372 • Exhibit H ' Wildlife Information - ' The site is bound by agricultural lands on the south; Weld County Road 7, a pond and a mining operation to the ' west ; another mining operation and agricultural land north of the site; and, Interstate 25 one-quarter mile to the ' east . A trailer park is located adjacent the northeast corner of permit boundary . Two homes and a dairy operation occupy the proposed permit area, as well as an Irrigation ditch and gas well facilities. - Typical or probable wildlife expected to Inhabit the site include small rodents, cottontail , Jackrabbits. ' squirrels, coyotes, and skunks. Avian species sighted in the area include geese, ducks, pheasants, hawks, swallows and sparrows. ' According to the Colorado Latilong Study. Threatened and Endangered species in the area may include the White Pelican, Peregrin Falcon, Greater Sandhi ) ! Crane, Whooping Crane. and the Bald Eagle. The landowner is not aware 'of recent sightings of any of these species. ' During operations, there will be a temporary loss of food and habitat . Upon completion of operations, wildlife habitat will be restored to include surface water with vegetated shorelines. ' Due to the nature of the site. I-2S to the east , adjacent housing, and other mining operations throughout the area, previous seasonal use of the area by wildlife has long since been disrupted. Any further impact to the wildlife communities is expected to be minimal or insignificant . e Page 16 890372 • I r • Ultimately, there will be an increase in waterfowl habitat due to the open water . The landowner would prefer not to develop desirable wildlife habitat because of the potential for Illegal hunting and trespassing. However, ' this Is the only feasible reclamation plan due to the proximity of the water table to the surface of the ground. Neither the landowner nor the operator Intend that the pond be used for recreational purposes. 1 The proposed Mining/Reclamation Plan Is designed to generate minimum Impact and reclaim disturbance by regrading and revegetating for general agricultural use. Mining and reclamation activities will take into ' account the safety and protection of wildlife on site and will only temporarily impact wildlife. Even though wildlife ' habitat management and creation is not part of the reclamation plan, the ultimate configuration of the land will be more conducive to wildlife than its present configuration . ' The Division of Wildlife has been contacted and an evaluation/inspection report will be forwarded when available. 1 i 1 1 Page 17 890372 1 ZEIMMEIMIE I Exhibit I Soils Information As mapped by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, Weld County Survey, three soil types occur on site. The soils map, on sheet 2 of 2 enclosed in a pocket at the end of the application, illustrates the extent and location of each soil type within the site. 1 The predominant soil type is Held silty clay, 1 to 3 ' percent slopes <# 27 on the map) . This Is a deep, moderately well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4950 to S050 feet . It formed in alluvial sediment derived from shale. Typically the surface layer is light brownish gray and light yellowish brown silty clay about 7 Inches thick. The subsoil is light brownish gray silty clay about 27 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silty clay- ' Permeability Is slow. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is e moderate. Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded US 4 on the map) , a nearly ' level map unit , is in depressions In smooth plains and along the bottoms of natural drainage ways. These are deep, ' poorly drained soils that formed In recent alluvium. Commonly the soils have a mottled, mildly to moderately alkaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying ' material that extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. Page 18 890372 1 e Most of the acreage is subject to excessive runoff . The water table is at or near the surface in spring and during the peak of the irrigation season. Bankard sandy loam. 0 to 3 percent slopes (# 10 on the map) , is a somewhat excessively drained soil on flood plains. It formed In stratified recent alluvium along ' streams and rivers. Typically the surface layer of the Bankard soil is ' brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 Inches Is pale brown calcareous ' sand stratified with thin lenses of sandy loam, loam, and fine gravel . 1 Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. The SCS Soil Survey identifies the topsoil of all three soil types found on site as poor. Aquolis and Aquepts are ' poor due to wetness. Bankard soils are too sandy and Heldt soils are too clayey . The site Inspection also revealed the ' topsoil to be of fair to poor quality, at a 6 inch depth, on all areas except the cultivated farm land. Mlneralaoosit_Dlscs= on A series of test holes have been analyzed throughout the site. The test results are available to the MLRD upon request. Page 19 890372 1 1 • The location , depth, and ouantltian of available. topsoil and overburden are outlined as follows: Aya LLo.t.th- xolassLL - Approximately 95 acres of the area to be mined is pasture land with 6 inches of available topsoil . 76,633 cuyd - Approximately 95 acres of the area to be mined is cultivated farm land with 3 feet of available topsoil . 459,g00 cuyd total topsoil 536,433 cuyd Available Oyerburden Approximately 200 acres is to be mined. Test borings ' Indicate that about one foot of overburden is available on the west half of the site. Overburden on the east half of ' the site ranges from 0 to 7 feet In depth, averaging about 3.5 feet deep. ' 100 acres g 1' depth 161 ,333 cuyd 100 acres 9 3.5' depth 564.677 cuyd total overburden 726.000 cuyd Topsoil and overburden requirements for reclamation are outlined as follows: Tontoil _a tributlon Reaulremcn„ 40 ac - backfllled east portion of site 5 ac - shoreline. 540 ft/year for 20 years a 20 ft width 20 ac - processing areas (These areas will be reclaimed as surface water. Topsoil requirements are included here in the event operations ceased prior to final reclamation. ) t65 ac - total Page 20 890372 1 1 Replacing topsoil at an average 6 inch depth over the 65 acres will require 52,433 cuyd of soil . Overburden Required fpr baaflll 40 ac - a average 18' mining depth 1 ,161 ,000 cuyd ' Qv_erburden Availablejor 8ackfill from west half of site 726,000 cuyd ' excess topsoil 484.000 cuyd total available 1 ,210,000 cuyd ' The calculations used are approximate. They are shown to demonstrate that an adequate quantity of quality topsoil texists on site for salvage and redistribution on all areas requiring revegetation, and also to demonstrate that a sufficient quantity of overburden is available on site to backfill the 40 acres on the eastern portion of the site as ' planned. The above calculations indicate that approximately 48,400 cuyd of excess material will be available. This ' material , or any additional excess, will be used to further raise the elevation of the eastern area of the site slated for backfill . 1 1 - 1 Page 21 590372 A 1 Exhibit J Vegetation Information eApproximately 90 acres of the site. iying mainly In Phases III and V of the mine plan , currently are being farmed. Corn stubble presently remains from the last harvest . Farming this land area will continue until mining - has progressed to these phases of operations. Phases I , II and V of the Mine Plan comprise the - ' nucleus of the dairy farm. Vegetation on this pasture area is made-up of a variety of preferred species for the cattle. - ' The remaining 40 acres at the southeast end of the site are not being used for any specific purpose at this time. ' Vegetation is made up of a variety of weeds, fortis and grasses, including western wheatgrass, blue grama grass, ' buffalo grass and alkati sacaton. The vegetative rover on this pasture area is estimated as moderate ( le. , 50 to 75 percent) . Only a few trees exist on the site. No unique, rare, or endangered plant species are known to exist on site. . 1 1 i Page 22 890372 I I • Exhibit K IClimate I The climatology data recorded at the Longmont 2 ESE weather station indicates the average annual precipitation ' at the site to be approximately 12.6 inches per year and the annual mean temperature to be approximately 49 degrees Fahrenheit .I Average I Monthly Total Temperature Precipitation 1 (0F) ( inches) January • 27.4 .34 February 31 .4 .43 March 35.7 .96 ' April 46.7 1 .26 May 57.2 2.53 IJune 65.6 1 .76 July 72.0 1 . 18 I August 69.9 1 . 12 September 61 . 1 1 . 16 October 50.3 .98 ' November 37.2 .52 December 3Q.2 .35 ' Mean/Total 48.7 12.59 I I 690372 IPage 23 1 Exhibit L ' Reclamation Costs 1 Reclamation costs are correlated with the disturbance classifications presented in the Mining Plan, Exhibit D. MS=_DI,tuba : ' Excavation - IS acres undergoing excavation, to remain as surface water, will have no associated reclamation costs. - Material stockpile area - 4.13 acres 1 Ripping/scarifying - 1 ac/hr 9 $50/hr $207.00 Topsoiling - $07 cuyd/ac 9 $.64/cuyd 2.133.00 ' Seed and seeding - $125/ac 516.00 Fertilizer and fertilizing - $50/ac 207.00 Mulch (when necessary *) - $125/ac S16.Q0 Major Disturbance Total $3,579.00 - (* Mulching is not necessary to achieve revegetation In this area except on the most severe sites. The possible cost of mulching is included above to cover this contingency. ) Moderate Disturbance Batch Plant - 4. 13 acres - Plant Area - 5g;Q acres Total - 9. 27 acres Ripping/scarifying - i ac/hr 2 $50/hr $489.00 _ Topsoiling - 807 cuyd/ac a $.64/cuyd 4,736.00 Seed, fertilize, and mulch - $300/ac 7.751 .00 $7,976.00 890372 ' Page 24 I I r 1 1 • 1 Pond area - 7 acres Dozing - 1 ,613 cuyd/ac 9 $.23/cuyd *371 .00 Topsolling - 807 cuyd/ac 9 *.64/cuyd 3.615.00 Seed, fertilize, and mulch 9 $300/ac 7.100 .00 $6,086.00 1 Shoreline undergoing topsoil distribution .55 acres first year (1200 lineal feet 9 20 foot width) 1 ,20. acres each year thereafter (540 lineal feet 9 20 foot width .80 acres total Shoreline Topsolling Estimate - 1 5 acres 807 cuyd/ac 9 $.64/cuyd $2,582.00 Moderate Disturbance Total $16,644.00 diaot Disturbance Reseeding shoreline - 5 acres Seed, fertilizer, and mulch 9 $300/ac $1 ,500.00 Total *21 ,723.00 Contingency _ 1 .852.00 1 Recommended Bond Grand Total $23.575.00 i 1 1 1 Page 25 890372 1 1 ' Exhibit M Compliance with Local Zoning Weld County consideration of Special Review for Mining is in progress. County approval of this operation will be forwarded when available. County approval is expected on schedule and prior to the March Mined Land Reclamation Board Meeting. 1 Exhibit N - Other Permits or Licenses NPDES and Air Emissions Permit Applications are being prepared for submittal to the Colorado Department of Health. eExhibit O - Source of Legal Right to Enter The operator has the legal right to enter this pit as indicated 1 by the following document. Exhibit P - Owners of Record of 1 Surface and Subsurface Rights The owner of record of the surface and subsurface 1 right is: Phillip E. Camenisch 1 10504 Weld County Road 7 1 Longmont, CO 80501 1 1 1 Page 26 890372 Immediately Adjacent Landowners Cooper, John T. 9998 Weld Co Rd 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Kobobel, William Edward and Margaret 7909 Weld Co Rd 5 Longmont, CO 80501 Hallenbeck, Kirk and Dawn 10003 Weld Co Rd 7 Longmont, CO 80501 ' Reese, Harold and Fred 855 Sunrise Hwy Lynbrook, New York 11563 ' Mobile Home Properties LTD 83-3 DBA River Valley Mobile Home Park 3924 Hwy 119 Longmont, CO 80501 Mountain Empire Dairymens Assoc. WDCI ' P.O. Box 33120 Thornton, CO 80233-0120 Larson, Dorothy E. 10706 Weld Co Rd 7 Longmont, CO 80501 ' Silvers, William L. and Shirley J. 10608 Weld Co Rd 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Rural Ditch Company 3598 St. Hwy 119 Longmont, CO 80501 1 ' Page 27 890372 1 ' Weld County Engineering Dept. P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 Page 28 a 80372 e . e • 4/5/89 COPY OF NOTICE MAILED FIRST CLASS TO:.' • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOI RS WELD COUNTY COLORADO I?. 0. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 JAMES A. LIONBERGER, ATTORNEY AT LAW HOPP, CARLSON & BECKMANN 2130 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE, SUITE 1 LONGMONT, CO 80501 • • Nu _ CQM, 7v James A.Lionberger AROMn.r Law A Shareholder in Hopp.Carlson&Beckmann,P.C. 2170 Mountain View Avenue,Suite A Longmont.Colorado 80501 Local Metro 303.776.4045 313.49.2913 890372 oC0 P 104 454 440 P 104 454 441 P 104 454 442 `'J� • : (, 1 l,t 1,i.i i. L ',A1{ C _ C� 'taPHILLIP E. CAMENISCH JOHN T. COOPER WILLIAM & MARGARET KOBOBEL 10504 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 9998 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 7909 WELD COUNTY ROAD 5 LONGMONT, CO 80501 LONGMONT, CO 80501 LONGMONT, CO 80501 I 1 t :, X-Q XP 'YaRe. 1 JtaXr 9 e X , XP r � F ¢ liii'! Ifl � � o l 1 .1 ..kl tirigc n ;PI-1 I I Ili:I is If 2 ,12 li 04 i. .) bitit v 12 0 g 11 In N Ii ��. 0 o b a 3 Y ( V II I D :i td E 1 .tc" fit 4i '' 04 q g i , , , , . 1 t °1 P 104 454 443 P 104 454 444 P 104 454 445 (Xj 104 454 446 , ' r.`. r ,rtIC .', kit tt r OF r'G' i r A., 1, rt i rkir. CCI,ri, i 'It_11 .r_ , up'. Cr E{ int. 1 Fo•-; �.r & DAWN HALLENBECK HAROLD & FRED REESE MOBILE HOME PROPERTIES LTD83-3 MOUNTAIN EMPIRE DAIRYMENS 10003 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY DBA RIVER VALLEY MOBILE HOME ASSOC WDCI LONGMONT, CO 80501 LYNBROOK, NY 11563 PARK 3924 HIGHWAY 114 P.O. BOX 33120 LONGMONT, CO 80501 THORNTON, CO 80233-0120 I , I V 1 1 ' l I k FI aq . ,� 6_ sx yq Qf +iL i SX4ilcPr ' xlift rao �mmy [� $44 sc 0 ' to, il 1 Woo f t i - g 9�ao a- r oyo '�� f F lox5ern V . in) ,1I� Hranr� I o �i Sq,-� ' 1 F z '"' 8 • 7 ; moY pnd if I •xrIa E„„I�c t �, � zo i3 -� A I I � XFL 533 1 r � z - �`b. 4 1O9 cN s@l ' 1. wG" Mg• `,-;\ ' Di aFgl I L ppc° K � ftd H III 4 1.0 f1 ' .' 'A bi �n W e9C 61 I—. O H W Y Nil »e °� x y0 . i g o z • f • : _ • 1 Pit itt III , (f11f, a € o ; 111J ,.� ti - It I I 4IpI V. if I A` I ti la mn X!!!!,, III❑dU f, .Pg I tel. i ,..c, If ciao I911 • el x a "al 1 ilia P 194 454 447 P 104 454 448 P 104 454 449 1' 104 454 450 D E. i:_. . , r ..;ri „L . Ir u ,?'ALL a'I F - r" if L: A AiL1l%il a. a.lnfl /a Co) DOROTHY E. LARSON WILLIAM & SHIRLEY SILVERS RURAL DITCH COMPANY ARTHUR KOLDEWAY 10706 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 10608 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 3598 STATE HIGHWAY 119 6228 NORTH COUNTY ROAD 13 tO LONGMONT, CO 80501 LONGMONT, CO 80501 LONGMONT, CO 80501 LOVELAND, CO 80537 ; 1 t 4 ; ) __I t I E 1 a I xexp w r sb ...4 xi.. m r g , v oka P : k . Xp si,_ pp ais HOT 1 O r+ aQ ,�1 ' O W '•ao :2 C l.�iagir ii ,,. 1 1 ': 8 � tM • ! H8, 4uE I o cn HA •M1 rr1 1, 11llE�� + y9 �!, Dory' ., onx d nti' xJ • til on � d V,., a Co L to iC ;~U xygOHn _ E �^V a O • ' OZE I Fill i wci2 i OIjitUji i r!F u• iii _. i r!.. 1 Et it i i I 0 sl I i • a P R I Olt?' 1 1 P R 1 Otantect 14 I P R i ORM P g ...FOR I Ens i Pi , fr is tit II 4 hi I fe • liti 1 liri °pill . tilt flitg. 41, 11121 ! 1 t. g i II I DOD -C t. i i , , .it ..C.1 I Iii VI II 1 ; L if4 rill . .,.., I i 1.-et a li is. t Pe 4 , ! .1 1 igi -5 if i 1 it avo s i tiv i . it, 0 . , li I IL 1I P 104 454 451 P 104 454 452 P 104 454 453 tit f 1 _:}, C." C MAIL "' . - F ' t lr hSi�i F-_ CIJ P1i N ST. VRA1N, LTD. J.L. S NANCY GROOM MOUNTAIN EMPIRE DAIRYMENS • C/0 RICHARD DOMENICO +' '. 8200 W. 67TH STREET 9777 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 ASSOCIATION 04 I LONGMONT, CO 80501 12450 WASHINGTON STREET ARVADA, CO 80004 THORNTON, CO 80241 N l 1 1iJJj1 `a h 11 gi % !IIUfIti'fr � '� O £V . y' ea c I ' ztai ' g. yr S g e sA OH3:_ • t OKO I cliff 2 - s 1 QO`' [*f ■� / ono NI fJjfl I 1 ` ooh sil .. =CCig _ ? M, M 4, en 1..F ¢ ill, p y tit 92.41 Diary t. 1 (41 I , , ! cost O r • 1,1 4. ti f f it a 1 3 s:!jJ1f1q!' j; I. £# I 1111Q1 P sit° ! OOO-• a! I it Re 1 it DDD ODQ I lilt li 1 t 1 g I RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 57 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 46 AND 48 FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 WORKING DAYS FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . . local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . . " , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 57 between Weld County Roads 46 and 48 be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective April 24 , 1989 , for approximately 10 working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. Ti0a<7 C//� • , �� (a& 890373 Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 57 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of May, A.D. , 1989, nunc pro tunc April 24, 1989. 1/47 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST "' WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman i ..BY: i11cyj,.c , , ( t ,, ,;J u 1'� e Joh'. on, Pro-Tem Deputy County clerk f , APPROVED AS TO FORM: = e Bran ner EXCUSED C--->C7L. 0 e�e--J2 George 77 � County Attorney � _.-,/ Gord rdd}J 890373 • ! - •-.+^," `'oG n .' I o;t d • 1/I / / -1 r. V� / 1•`�•. +J • 1 ii I , s i i ...... _ . • s, / - ` / .. _`•__ : - -••:-••••••••..-_,,...--.. u�ll�G3�Y F(s�1' `r /> Type fl/ 'weir: E' _ _:. gUGCI (0S£' �(-4- w/H g174 /GS�Pr Qefonr nvro� hr""H r & d C(o�% d Loco / 7"e•G r o c aH ri • - !; "" - • OP-Iour 750 =�: f?oo C /osd = 'F;"v`== : ?nod( CYos d (Vev/aqi Cro hTIC/Of VEf/ac{fr,+ PI • .: _: = ( n/Gil ) Poe- appra/i�,,, aIP/y �/CI wortv it,O OYS i ::- • I TITLE c 0(D;1.,ve. wci2 5--i a" n/c,e </ c/ wet? 4/1 d SJwEY SY - - OAi E - ' - DRAWN Er itingt-ir DATE C/ 7//(^7 � CKcCraD BY .: 7 -.5.:, cour.'TY ROAD r:1 -5- :1 l - .: -:;#7:_- -- -----.1: APPROVED EY COUNTY Et:CINEEF, i i :- . , i WELD COUNTY DEPART tii•ciri G `trwltRYE_RU . I • " " " 890373 2 /:f. - MEMORADDUIY1 Wilk Clerk to the Board April 25, 1989 To IMO George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge COLORADO From A Road Closure Subject The following road was closed April 24, 1989 for a bridge replacement. It will be closed approximately 10 working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 57 between WCR 46 & WCR 48 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 46 WCR 48 WCR 57 890373 J RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST LEE C. ARCHER AND JUDITH C. ARCHER FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney' s Office, and WHEREAS, Lee C. Archer and Judith C. Archer are in violation of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matter, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against Lee C. Archer and Judith C. Archer to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Lee C. Archer and Judith C. Archer to remedy the violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified party. j '. �'. '2/9 ,' /rc 890374 Page 2 RE: ZONING VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of May, A.D. , 1989. `� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: / y�� l �J WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman BY; ./ , . , l� t, / e Jo son, Pro-Tem Dep J County erk / APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner ,� J — EXCUSED CMC7Lr�e George Kenn County Attorn6y GorkiA(hc} 890374 I i e r' fEMORAnDum wirDc: T, Board of County Commissioners Date April 25. 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services Subjfict• Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI-1330 Lee C. Archer and Judith C. Archer 2631 64th Avenue - Greeley, CC 80631 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation material; are available et the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 890374 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF DACONO AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a Letter of Agreement with the City of Dacono regarding building inspection services to the Colorado National Speedway property, which the City of Dacono is in the process of annexing, and WHEREAS, after review the Board deems it advisable to approve said Letter of Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Letter of Agreement with the City of Dacono be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Letter of Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April, A.D. , 1989. `" (*A . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman ..\ BY: , } • ,. , , . . te....-,/4.2a e .ne Jo �j son, Pro-Tem epu y County Clerk , .� APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. B antner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE crl George Kenn ,y ounty Attorney Go fLoo - - �� : 890380 City of Dacono, Colorado AA '*'4.£�1?�194 Lee Morrison, Esq. April 17, 1989 Assistant County Attorney 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Morrison: As you know, the City has commenced proceedings for the annexation of the Colorado National speedway property (the legal description of the property is attached) . The hearing on the proposed annexation is scheduled for May 8, 1989; the ordinance for the annexation, if approved, would be finally adopted on May 22, 1989. At this time there appear to be no foreseeable impediments to the completion of the annexation. During the period prior to the anticipated completion of the annexation, the City of Dacono is willing to provide its building inspection services to the Colorado National Speedway property. The owner of the Colorado National Speedway property has requested that the City provide such services in order to permit the owner to move forward with compliance with the building code and other applicable codes of the City of Dacono prior to the 1989 racing season. We understand that the attorney for the property owner has discussed this matter with you, and that provision of the City's building inspection services to the Colorado National Speedway property would be acceptable to Weld County. Please contact Dacono City Attorney Tami Tanoue (303-298-1601) before April 24, 1989 if the County has any concerns about the matters set forth in this letter. If the County has no such concerns, the Dacono City Council will be requested at its april 24, 1989 meeting to formally approve the provision of building inspection services as described in this letter. Thank you for your assistance. sincerely, CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO By, /2 t IO / •; f. cc: Charles Dickson, Esq. (2V . Jim Opperman Mayor and Councilmembe acono Tami Tanoue, Dacono Cit ttorney 890360 512 Cherry Street• P.C.Box 186• Damao. Colorado 80614 . Metro-825.1266• Loral-833-2317 I THE FOREGOING IS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED THIS 24th DAY OF Anril , 1989 BY THE CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO. CITY OF DACONO, COLORADO AD eel ayor ATTEST: By:_ 11�f'A City C1er THE FOREGOING IS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED THIS 26th DAY OF April , 1989 BY THE COUNTY OF WELD, COLORADO. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: a.,t‘silD1/4),(\ , ` ^ nn c� 4?„& l pro ATTEST: /1 f2 tt T&u/t4kLCnt) ---B : /.2---- (42tico--.) Co my Clerk and\Recorder 11/159 -2- 890380 GRIFFITHS & TANOUE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW DLAXE STREET TERRACE T&.(3031 2084601 18600[4OZ STRELT,SUITE SSo FAX(303)29&1627 DENVER,COLORADO 80202 April 25, 1999 Lee Morrison, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Mr. Morrison: The following is response letter dated April21, 1989. in t telephone In of April 20, 1989 and yourthat conversation and that letter, you indicated to me that as a conditiobuilding s inspection of the nservicesty's utoscthe eColo ado to the City's ation provision National Speedway property pending annexation, the County would require the City to annex Weld County Road 10 from the Speedway property to the 1-25 frontage road. In response, at its April 24, 1989 meeting, the Dacono City Council adopted the following motions: 1. To accept petitions from the Weld County Board of County Commissioners for the annexation of: a. Weld County Road 10 from the western edge geh Ie of the Colorado National Speedway property frontage road; and b. Weld County Road 12 from the western edge of the Oase property to the I-25 frontage road (as you will recall, the County requested this annexation at the time of the City's annexation of the Case property) ; and 2. To approve the provision by the city building inspector of City building inspection services to the Colorado National Speedway property pending completion of the Speedway property as provided in the Mayor's April 17, 1989 letter to you. 890380 Ise Morrison, Esq. - April 25, 1989 Page 2 Enclosed is the letter agreement approved by the city Council. Please have the County Commissioners approve the agreement and send me a copy of the approved agreement. Also enclosed are two copies of the City's standard annexation petition. Please have the petitions executed, attach legal descriptions of the properties to be annexed, and then return them to me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, GRIFFITRS & TANOUE, P.C. - By: Tami A. Tanoue TAT:j1 Enc. - cc: . Mayor and Councilmembers, Dacono Jim Opperman -. 11/165 590380 .� ruin:: y.a.o xu-u..i . .........,�.....,� �, .ti ,.v.vuSo1Dlg1 f4,7 2/10/89 • PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DACONO, COLORADO We, the undersigned landowners, in accordance with Colorado law, hereby petition the City of Dacono and its City Council for annexation to the city of Dacono of the unincorporated territory, the legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, located in the County of Weld and the State of Colorado, and to be known as the Annexation to the City of Dacono. As part of this petition, your petitioners further state to the City Council that: 1. It is desirable and necessary 'that the territory described in Exhibit A be annexed to the City of Dacono. 2. The requirements of Sections 31..12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. , as amended, exist or have been met in that: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the City of Dacono or will be contiguous with the City of Dacono within such time as required by Section 31- 12-104. b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the City of Dacono. - c. The area proposed to be annexed is urban or will be - urbanized in the near future. d. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the City of Dacono. - e. No land within the boundary of the territory - proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, has been divided into separate parts or parcels without the written consent of the landowner or landowners thereof, unless such tracts or parcels were separated by a dedicated street, road, or other public way. f. No land within the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed which is held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real 1 890380 -'Hb Iur 14•'... 4LI:. r 1!...1... .x, .. w.v� r .�� .... w.+�r....w+ .w„ . .+AMMEMME,MIPI estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate, comprises twenty acres or more, and which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon, has an assessed value in excess of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation, has been included within the area proposed tc *nnexed without the written consent of the landowner or landowners. g. No annexation proceedings have been commenced for any portion of the territory proposed to be annexed for the annexation of such territory to another municipality. h. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not result in the detachment of area from any school district. i. The annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed will not have the effect of extending the boundary of the City of Dacono more than three miles in any direction from any point of the boundary of the City of Dacono in any one year. j . The territory proposed to be annexed is acres in total area. k. Prior to completion of the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed, a plan will be in place, pursuant to Section 31-12-105(1) (e) , C.R.S. , which generally describes the proposed location, character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways, playgrounds, squares, parks , aviation fields, other public ways, grounds, open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be provided by the City of Dacono; and the proposed land uses for the area; such plan to be updated at least once annually. 1. In establishing the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, if a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of the street or alley has been included within the area annexed, and reasonable access will not be denied to any landowners, owners of any easement, or the owners of any franchise adjoining any platted street or alley which is to be annexed to the City of Dacono but is not bounded on both sides by the City of Dacono. 2 690380 APR-25-'89 TUE 14:47 II);I; C HSbTHNU.t PC, iEL N0:30.nnear0i tt437 Pee m. If required, an impact report will. be prepared and filed pursuant to section 31-12-108.5, C.R.S. 3. The owners of more than fifty percent of the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of dedicated streets and alleys, have signed this petition and hereby petition for annexation of such territory. 4. Accompanyiannexation nmapg tcontaininghis ithe following information:on are four copies of an a. A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed; osed to b. A be annexed, said map prepared be boundary of yia d cone area taining the seal of a registered engineer; c. within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if boundaries and rt or all of the area is platted, the plat numbers of plots or the lots and blocks; d. Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed, a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the City of Dacono and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed, and a showing of the dimensions of such contiguous boundaries. 5. Upon the annexation ordinance becoming effective, all lands within the area proposed to be annexed will become subject to allordinances, of theCity of Dacono, except resolutions, rules, and regulations for general property taxes of the City of Dacono, which shall be come effective as of the January 1 next ensuing. 6. The zoning classification requested for the area proposed to be annexed is 7. An annexation agreementpetitioners herein has been by the and the City of Dacono relating to this annexation and the petitioners hereby expressly consent to the terms and conditions set forth in the annexation agreement. tures are on the sheetF on,the the next page, respectful whose lya request that the signature uof Dacono, acting through its city council, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed: 9/14 3 890380 r Signature of Date of Signing Nailing Address Are you a regis- Are you a non- See Exhibit Landowner/ of Bach Signature of Landowner/ tered elector, resident land- attached hereto _ Petitioner Petitioner resident land- owner of the area and incorporated owner of the area proposed to be into this peti- proposed to be annexed? tion by this annexed? (Yes or No) • reference, for (Yes or No) the legal de- scription of the, land owned by this signer • 8903S0 r I 1e-DIT FORM PRESCRISEO ST THE PROPERTY TAR ADMINISTRATOR FORM 020 I/ee•I/e4 PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES—H0ECREi. Co.. ucnv[R SSG'S Petitioners: Use this side only. CREELEY , Colorado, MARCH 132 , 1989 City or Town To The Honorable Board of County Commissioners of `''ELD County Gentlemen: The petition of JAPES L. HUFF, D.D.S. whose mailing address is 1770 25 AVENUE, SUITE 102 O: LEY COLORADO 80631 City or Town State Zip Code SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL 1985 PERSONAL PROPERTY LEASEHOLD INPROVE1v7E "TS DECLARATION SCHEDULE restfully rrpuests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A. D. 19 , 19 6 19 are erroneous or illegal for the following reasons, viz: (Explain completely why the assessment is erroneous or illegal) THE LEASEHOLD III'2ROVEWTEN"TS ARE A PHRMA1r'i"T PART OF THE BUILDNO AND ThEREFORE SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED PERSONAL PROPERTY. THE Th 'R0V "rNTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION OF THE REAL ESTATE. 19..$5.. 19 86 19 87 Value 3440 Tax 333.58 Value 3390 Tax 327.70Value 5170 Tax 395.12 Orig. 333.58 327.70 395.12 Abate. 333.58 327.70 395. J.2 Bal. 0 0 0 That he has paid said taxes. Wherefore your petitioner prays that the taxes, as aforesaid erroneously or illegally assessed, may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 1,056.40 I declare, under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. ( // 1 - Petitioner By Agent Address / s�� • „if-/ _ �... . //,��F.:_ - 890385 RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the 1st day of May A.D. 19 S9 at which meeting there were present the following members' Chairman Pro-Tem Jacqueline Johnson and Commissioners Gene R. Brantner and Gordon E. Lacy, with Chairman C.W. Kirby and Commissioner George Kennedy absent notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County and said Assessor Richard W. Keirnes and taxpayer James L. Huff being present; and (nal") (name) WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within applica- tion,and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board concurs with the recommendation of (concurs or does not concur) the assessor and the petition be approved p and an abatement/refund be allowed 3,oe ravel nled) (be allowed or not be allowed) on an assessed valuation of$3,390 - 1986 for $ 1,056.40 total tax for the year(s) 19 85, 86 & 87. 5,170 - 1987 \ .. .. C•airm of Boa of County Commissioners. STATE OF COLORADO, County of Weld (.ss, I, Mary Ann Feuerstein ,County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Geld County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Greeley this 1st day of May A. D. 19 89 ___ ( :c rr 1 County Clerk. By \ l � `�\J, Deputy. ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR Denver,Colorado, 19 The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby o approved; [] approved in part $ fl denied for the following reason(s) ATTEST: Secretary. Property Tax Administrator. om • �� R v N m. � P F" 6 Le O 0' ,h YT r`4' �'T� 'a a, GVol, O m a F ' 7 -_, g =m ° C V W C I u M V 1 ra A _a., CO ,,, 0p a c 4 'u \\ O E N LLa 0.2 •p 7$ j V Q I I Li.n, is C 0 t�-.� • ';, R y o1 eo d le < Cj 3 m ? r .. ')v °,_ 5 � cu, o� v P . u o t U a E � §_og d co Y ≥, G 0 A E G.c dC, v G ?-`,p�1�� get... C °y' p, yL"a' I € 7 ,c v O A V O.'r `± _ ... �` k O r 3 t4 iA a �O ' Li C `� \ 33g .. �s�ro n ° m (- 9M13. a< AGREEMENT FOR THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Agreement entered into on this 24th day of April , 19 89 , by and between Weld County - GiesertPit, herein the "System", which includes Suppliers'-a'nd'Fermiittefrt ?Alined in Weld County Ordinance #60B and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners on behalf of the Weld County Health Department for the Sampling and Analysis of Pollutant Discharge. I. AUTHORIZATION TO ACT The "System" hereby authorizes the Weld County Health Department to perform the services listed in this Agreement and in Weld County Ordinance #60B, Testing of Drinking Water and Pollution Discharge, which is incorporated herein by reference, on behalf of the "System". Weld County Health Department shall act as an independent contractor in relation to the "System" in the performance of its duties under this Agreement. II. TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1989 and shall remain in full force and effective until December 31, 1989. III. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Type of Test Contracted No. of Samples Contracted Fee TSS As Requested $ 5.15/ea pH As Requested $ 1.05/ea Oil & Grease As Requested $ 1.05/ea Per Sample as Submitted $ 7.25 Sample picked up by Environmental Health Specialist $35.00 per hour Or/ G . � -2— The methods used by the Weld County Health Department in providing said services shall be in accordance with Section I1(B) of the Weld County Ordinance #60B. Weld County Health Department shall provide further services as mutually agreed upon by the Weld County Health Department and the "System". IV. OBLIGATIONS OF THE "SYSTEM" The "System" shall have the obligations as set forth in Section II(B) of Weld County Ordinance 4608. The "System" shall pay for the services rendered by the Weld County Health Department according to the contracted amount. Payment shall be in four (4) equal installments which will be due on the last day of each quarter: i.e. March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 1989. BY:'1/4 an ,+. BY: D R.w ,\ �(Jc�-�+`o Chair'aan r - em "System' Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado TITLE OF AUTHORITY: Mining Supervisor ATTEST;`7Y c/Jn y Clerk tand Weld CLL�nty and Recorder and Cleric to the Board BY: "fr.- eputy County C ekk y I CVA-26 REV. 10/88 • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES - DIVISION OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COUNTY VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER'S MONTHLY REPORT AND CERTIFICATION OF PAY Weld COUNTY MONTH March 19 89 BENEFITS AND SERVIES CLAIMED NO. BENEFITS AND SERVICES CLAIMED NO. Telephone Calls /343 Compensation 175 Personal Contacts (Office) 1348 OTC 41 Personal Contacts (Home) +240 Pension 150 23-22 - Colo Veterans Affairs I 3 I Death Pension 135 23-22 - Other Organizations 1 6 Insurance I 2 Medicaid Cases 17 I Burial Allowance 6 Loan Applications 6 I Voc. Rehab & Education 2 Medical Benefits • 13 I I State Benefits 1 I I I hereby certify that on this date April 25, 1989 , I have been paid a salary for the month of March 19 49 from Weld County in the amount of yld4u.9L dollars for my services as county veterans service officer; and, in addition, that $16.71.63 dollars have been disbursed by said county for expenses incurred in the operation of the county veterans service office, in accordance with 26-1 -108, ^ 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes. '' 4 CreC I hereby certify the accuracy of this Report. v/� (Signed %n.o.e. ry� _ County %.-C misstcare or their designee rot of W2tn County ATTEST: u^�' 'il.4 BY: ,...utJ EPUTY COUNTY CLERIC This certification submitted monthly, properly signed and executed, will be considered as application for the monetary benefits payable to the County General Fund, in accordance with 26-10-108, 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes. This form should be submitted before the 15th of the following month. Mail to: Colorado Department of Social Services. Division of Veterans Affairs, 1575 Sherman Street, 1st Floor, Denver, CO 80203-1114. / A old) - "Xi / / (97, 890381 , � mEmoRAn®um �� 1111€ C. W. Kirby, Chairman ,,, Board of County Commissioners Dee May 1. 1939 COLORADO From Walter J. Spec man, Human Resources, Executive Director C/sl Subject. Community Food and Nutrition Program Application Enclosed for Board approval is an application for Community Food and Nutrition (CFN) funds through the Colorado State Department of Local Affairs. Weld County has been notified that it has been awarded $1,351 of CFN funds. These funds will be used in conjunction with other homeless service funds at Weld Information and Referral Services (WIRS). The funds will be used to provide service to low-income families with infants in need of special formula needs. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3815. pYk �k' -�rh.,,a.]. v ' ' " �.v i.sire< <M• M1 'TA.. r ��,+, ,1 -.4,1„:.3' , {' ,,. yF""`yi:.'h.X ✓;"�'�y` y,.1i F id\rt r'°�u,r"Y'KC�, .;''' Di.,....;;;;; :: MKc 1" n a c�':k^rJ 78 �M's^hVC 4?7,rw: 'r.tz:q'4*".- +y`.rc1, '" }+,; qf r u z .�.1 W:—: :-. 1� o* a ♦, rµ rr MEMORANDUM- � r ,1r,,. . To: Clerk to tho Board _ ,, ! .. FR: Jeannie Tacker . RE': .Community-food end.Nut? ition.Progrmn- E1ppl ication ;;v',, . Enclosed for- signature are three (3) ,', copies of this application. ,•Please return two (2) of them once they. are signed. If you haae any questions, please ' telephone me at 353-3816. � St dyo 3na COMMUNITY FOOD & NUTRITION PROGRAM 1989 APPLICATION Agency: Weld County. Division of Human Resources Grant Amount: $ 1,361.00 Address: P.O. Box 1805 Greeley, CO 80632 Contact Person: Mr. Walter J. Speckman Telephone Number: (303) 353-3816 Executive Director Federal Objective/s Grant Complies With: X a. To improve the coordination of existing private and public assistance resources to better serve low-income communities; b. To assist low-income communities to identify potential sponsors of child nutrition programs and initiate programs in unserved and under-served areas; and X c. To develop innovative approaches at State and local levels to meet nutritional needs of low-income individuals. Applicant Program Description: The monies will be subcontracted to Weld Information and Referral Services (WIRS) who is currenty receiving ECSH monies from Weld County Division of Human Resources. WIRS will : i) Gather information pertaining to existing to nutritional programs serving low-income populations. The information will provide the demographics of clients served and will provide ongoing analysis of agencies that serve this population. The program will then be able to indentify service gaps. 2) A portion of funds will be used to service low-income families with infants that are in need of special formula needs. These families will only be those that cannot meet their needs through traditional services. Signatur Au torizpd Representative: ATTEST: ANCri 4d, „tiJ quel e Joh on, Chairman Pro-Tem Weld County Board of Commissioners BY. rox n, ,u kit 89 382 D putt' County Cler 41114k- MEM0RA11DUM C. W. Kirby, Chairman T^ Board of County Commissioners p81B May 1, 1989 COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources „UaQr Two Purchase of Services Agreement Between Weld County Division of Subject: Hurter Resources' Migrant H2, e Start Prngram R Plan de Salu&de1Va11e Enclosed for Board approval are two (2) Purchase of Services Agreements for the Migrant Head Start Program with Plan de Salud de Valle. The first agreement outlines that Plan de Salud de Valle will provide dental services for the migrant children in the south county location. The Migrant Head Start Program will reimburse Plan de Salud de Valle $30.00 per child for these services. The term of this agreement is from June 1, 1989 through October 31, 1989. The second agreement outlines that Plan de Salud de Valle will provide medical services for the migrant children in the Frederick and Longmont sites. The Migrant Head Start Program will reimburse Plan de Salud de Valle $25.00 per child, not to exceed $3,000, for these services. The term of the agreement is from June 1, 1989 through October 31, 1989. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3816. P { gSvbV✓b � •� 1 el l 4 "S � � '�(�,ln r 4 1•W i�M�� it` tit't v'S M ' " ,'^ .Jr G '.. "'x . u4 / -TO: Clerk to -the Board P 0 - 'FR: Jeannie Tacker RE: Two Purchase of Services Agreement . Between- Migrant Head Start and Plan de Salad de Valle . ' Enclosed are three (3) copies each of " these ,agreements.. x :�P Please return two (2) •each once .'they _ are; signed. • rite q . - . • 69C363 PURCHASE OF SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Z r''45 --day of April , 1989, by and between the Plan de Salud del Valle, hereinafter referred to as "Health Center," and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Migrant Head Start Program, hereinafter referred to as "Head Start." WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, Head Start and the Health Center agree as follows: I. Head Start agrees to transport the Head Start children to the Health Center to meet the scheduled dentist appointments. 2. The Health Center shall provide prophylaxis therapy and application of topical fluoride for each Head Start child. The Health Center agrees to provide all restoration and/or extractions as is deemed necessary on each referred child. 3. Head Start agrees to reimburse the Health Center $30.00 per child for these services. 4. Head Start will not be charged for those children covered by Public Assistance. Medicaid numbers shall be provided at the time of the appointment and the Health Center shall send the billing to the appropriate agency. 5. The term of this agreement is from June 1, 1989 through October 31, 1989. 6. This agreement may be modified upon the written consent of both parties. 7. The Health Center and Head Start mutually agree that this agreement may 890383 be cancelled by either party after a thirty (30) day written notice has been provided to the other party. S. This agreement will be terminated immediately in the event funding for the Migrant Head Start Program is stopped. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PLAN DE SALUD DEL VALLE 4 . f ie Jac ue'iia'e Johnson, hairman Pro-Tem Stanley J. Nflsher, Director WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES J ATTEST: a 1(1 Aiv‘taidifAixn%) W&-ft Speckman, Executive Director WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BO ,� By eputy ounty 89C383 1 PURCHASE OF SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 27:405 day of April , 1989, by and between the Plan de Salud del Valle, hereinafter referred to as "Health Center," and the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Migrant Head Start Program, hereinafter referred to as "Head Start." WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein agreed to be kept and performed, the Health Center and Head Start agree to provide the following described services based upon the terms and conditions outlined below: 1. The Health Center shall provide the health services for the Head Start centers located at 340 Maple, Frederick, Colorado, and 1335 Judson Street, Longmont, Colorado. 2. The Health Center shall provide the services of a Health Associate to Head Start. When available, the Health Associate will be present at the Head Start centers on a daily basis. The Health Center will be responsible for the Health Associate's mileage to and from the Head Start centers. 3. The Health Center agrees to provide all medical examinations, medical treatment, lab work, x-rays, etc. , as is deemed necessary for any referred Head Start child. 4. Head Start agrees to reimburse the Health Center at the rate of $25.00 per child not to exceed a total reimbursement of $3,000.00. The above cited rate will pay for all medical examinations, lab work, x-rays, etc. Prescriptions will not be covered in the above cited rate. 690383 5. The Health Center will not perform routine physical or dental examina- tions on the Head Start children. 6, The term of this agreement is from June 1, 1989 through October 31, 1989. 7. This agreement may be amended at any time with the written mutual consent of both parties. 8. The Health Center and Head Start mutually agree that this agreement may be cancelled by either party after a thirty (30) day written notice has been provided to the other party. 9. This agreement will be terminated immediately in the event funding for the Migrant Head Start Program is stopped. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PLAN DE SALUD DEL VALLE Jacqueline Johnson, )irman Pro-Tem Stanley J. Ifasher, Director WELD COUNTY DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES ATTEST; WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER �,L . ' AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Weilter7 'lreckman, Executive Directorr a ,Bliinkci"_„,_,./ l elou y ounty Aia-id 890393 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE 1 or 1 General FUND CLAIN'S V.O. WARRANT NO. P.O. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 902336 I 080409 I!I American Library Assoc. 49.00 _2n^727 I 21257R I American Library Assoc. 209.00 9n237R nAPP/3 Wickersham. William and 3,721.16 Toni M. Wickersham TOTAL $ 3,979.16 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss CDL'NTY OF W *D ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Page 1 through 2 and dated Mru 1 , 1989 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set oppos a their names with the total amount $ 3,979.16 DATED THIS 1st DAY OF Mau , 1989 WELD DU1<'11 Fn' OFFICER`'' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORD TO BEFORE ME THIS let DAY OF May 1989 . MY COMMISSION ;WIRES: My Commission Expires June 3, 1990 N Y L'ELIC STATE OF coLORADC ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the General FUND totaling $ 3 070 ig Chairperson ATTEST)1127,044):(€4,a) cc( County Cgerk & Record Me . °w � vnt V BY: �/eyrvi � Deputy r Member • STATE OF GoLOI(ADO ) • ) Ss . COUNTY .OF WELD ) SOCIAL SERVICES CLAIMS THIS 'IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED UtI THE FOLLOWING LISTED CLAIMS AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD RE MADE TO THE RESPECTIVE PAYEES IN THE AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES AS CERTIFIED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES. THE MIOUNTS BY CATEGORY ARE AS FOLLOWS; TOTAL WARRANTS CLAIMS AMOUNT • ADC ADC-U 2 IV-D 100.00 OAP AND IRA AB CA MED. TRANS. ADM SERVICES • CHILD WELFARE PAC DC • LEAP • OAP SUBTOTAL • OAP SS 2 SUBTOTAL SS 5100.00 GRAND TOTAL $100.00 DATED THIS 1St DAY OF May [984 , • • U! 1 i' lNiLN ' AND ADMINISTRATION --- SUBSCRIBED SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME TIIIS 1st DAY AY OF � ��J May , 1989 74 PUBLIC �� 4.64,„ NU MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Commission Expires June 9, 1990 �! STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WELD ) WE, THE' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. HEREBY APPROVE 171E CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE AND WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY DRAWN UPON TilE SOCIAL'SERVICES FUNDS AND CHARGEABLE AS STATED: u i 1c,,,J ATTEST: k^^ • WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO TER BOARD • • BYc__ momCOUNTY CLERK ' II I WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUt48ER NAHANNI • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT UBJ PHCJ AMOUNT • • A109834 ADAMS COUNTY AUFEE 24-9043-6495-4590 26. 10 V01142 24.•..9044163974715- - 404 .00 ID ID 440. 10 • A109835 UOCKIUSI KELLY 042889 21-6490-63988Y10 tOd.00 • 108 . 00 • • A109836 BUEDDEKER. JAY V0226♦ 24-9044-6397-4115 74 . 00 • 22640V 24-9044-6397-4715 62.00 • 13b. 00 • • A109831 ORATION' S .*31837 25-9070-6210-GAL 35.09 41 • _ ---35 .09 ID A109838 BRATTONIS1 INC 01475 11-3140-0229 14 . 55 • 01504 52-5510-6220 219. 18 ill 01524 19-4130-6220-GM€ 20.90 01326 21-6950-6210 30 .00 41 • 404 . 63 • • A109839 BRYANT ) 1000 042889 21-6490-6398-dYTO 93. 00 • 94 . 00 • • P109840 BUSINESS CLUB 7364 65-1191-6220 1 ,267 . 40 • 11267 . 40 • ID A109841 C 0 JONES 331598 01- 1061-6233-CC 46. 29 • • 46 . 29 • • A109842 CICCONE' LUCIANA 042d89 21-6490-6398-d?5I 120 .00 • • ID • • • ID ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/84 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 • AS Uf : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT CUJ PROJ AMOUNT ID • • 4109842 CLCCONE . LUCIANA 120.00 ID 4109843 CITY OF GREELEY MAY89 15-1943-6350- ISGR 9 .502. 92 • IP 91502.92 • ID A109844 CLARKE DIVISION R10221 0L- 1061-6250-VAC 21 .30 • 21 . 30 • A109845 CONSOLIDATED PARTS. INC . 053715 01-1061-6236-CC 31 . 33 • ' 31 . 23 ID II A109846 COREN PRINTING 11845 01-1127-6320 20 .00 • 15228 21-6800-6320-9 58 .00 • 7335 21-6850-6320-9 3.00 7462 19-4130-6220-GNt 15,00 • 41 96.00 ill • 4109847 OEJONN INVESTMENT CC. INC V02257 24-9044-6397-4715 352.00 22570V 24-9044-6397-47(5 223.00 • II 575 . 00 -- • • A109846 tLECTRONIC SERVICECENTER 18204 21-6600-6343-9 100.20 • 100 . 20 41 • 4109849 FRIAS. RCSITA 042889 21-6490-6392-8P5I 45.00 ID 45 .00 . • 4109850 FRONT RANGE RL880NS t. 2697 01-3400-6229 16.45 • II 16 .45 • • • ID • • ID 41 WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 0 AS Of : 04/26/89 0 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT Ill NUMBER NUMBER F0 DEPT DLJ PROD AMOUNT ID 0 A109851 GESICK, BRIAN 042889 21-6490-6398-8YTO 91 .50 93 .50 A109852 GONZALESI VALERIE 042889 21-6490-639d-dPSI 90 .00 41 • 90.00 0 A109853 GREELEY FOOD CLEARING HSE 033189 21-6600-6222-9 36.36 • S J6. 36 • O A109854 GREELEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 42110 0I -2110-6220- TANG 30.36 42372 19-4140-6220-FP 64 .00 • • 94. 36 • 0 A109855 GREELEY PRINTING CO 3627 19-4110-6210 5.00 3663 01-lO13-6320 15.00 20.00 4109856 HADDOCK' GARY 042889 2i-6490-6398-8YTO 57 . 06 • 57 .06 • 4109857 HALLORAN. PAUL ML24 25-9070-6323-GAL 7. 00 • 25-9070-6370-GAL 125.00 132 . 00 • _ AI A109856 HEATON) EMILY 042889 21-6490-6398-8PSI 60 ,00 • 0 60.00 0 A109859 HUGH M. W0003 945685 01-2110-6220-TRNG 24 .56 24 . 56 • 0 • IP -r ID IP IAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMOCR NARRANI • NUMBER NUMBER FD OEPT OBJ PRUJ AMGUNT • • A109860 HUMANE SOCIETY OF WELD CO MAY 01-2980-6350 5,592 . 75 I • 5 .592. 75 • • A109801 JANWAY, DENA 042689 21-6490-6098-3PS1 120 . 00 • 120.00 • • A109362 K-MART 907078 21-6950-6379 24 .88 • • 24. 88 • -- • A109663 KALEIDOSCOPE VISUALS, INC 881126 19-4130-63S0-GHE 270 . 50 • 270.50 • • A109864 KAPLAN SCHOOL SUPPLY CORP 400409 21-6600-6224-3 112. 86 • 112 . 86 • • P109865 KELLEY, KIMBERLY 042889 21-6490-6398-8PS1 120.00 • • 120.00 • • A109866 KING SOOPEHS 679348 01-2330-6222 224. 84 679952 21-6600-6224--9 84 .09 • 70279♦ 01-2430-6222 1S0. E4 • 499 . 77 • _- • A109867 KINKO4S 1040 01-3400-6320 23 .60 • 1138 01-4400-0320 .50 • 1237 01-3400-6320 57 .05 1398 01-3400^6320 26.00 • 1488 01-3400-6320 60.80 • 435 01-3400^6320 . 50 • 168. 65 • • • • • • • ID IM WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26189 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER RD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMCUNT • • A109866 KOMAC PAINT C DECORATING 25897 19-4130-6220-1NJ 67.60 • 67 .40 • • A109869 LAND, OSCAR G• 1599V4 24-9044-6397-4715 396.00 • 396 . 00 ID • A109870 LOMA1 CAMELIA 042889 21-6►90-6398-8PSl 120 ,00 ID • 120.00 • - -- •A109671 LOPEZ , NCRA 042669 21-6490-6398-8PST 120. 00 • 120.00 • • A109872 MASCARENAS, TONI 042889 21-6490-6398-8Y10 112. 50 . i 112 .50 • A109873 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES/ INC. 212561 2i-6600-6222-9 213. 23 • 0 213. 23 A109874 MICRO COMPUTER WORLD INC 12231 65-1191-6220 223 . 25 • 223. 25 • • A109875 NEVAREZ, ANA 042889 21-649C-6798-8PS1 J0.00 . ' . 30 .00 • A109874 NERCO INC 19516 01-1061-6233-CC 494, 20 • • 494. 20 • 0 A109877 PALACIOS , JUAN 042889 21-6490-6398-dYTO 120 , 00 • • • • • r • ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/84 . • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT - • • - A109877 PALACIOS, JUAN 120 . 00 • s A109878 PISANO. DELORAS 042889 21 -6490-6398-8PS1 120.00 • • 120 .00 • • A109879 PLUCKER. ARTLE 042889 21-6490-6398-8YT0 71 .70 • 71 . 70 • • A109880 PREFERRED CORRECTIONAL APRIL O1-2310-6350-MCNC 22,891 . 80 • • 22 .891 . 80 • A109881 PROPERTY TECNNICAN 1121W4 24-9034-6397-4115 140.00 • • 140 . 00 • • A109882 PUBLIC TRUSTEE l 25-9071-6397-GAL 11 . 00 - • 11 .00 • • .109883 R G A UNIFORM CENTER 10293 21-6490-6220-8 29. 95 • 10294 21-6490-6220-8 29 . 95 10297 21-6490-6220-d 29 .95 • • 69.85 • • A109884 RAMOS , MANUEL 042389 21-6490-6398-8PSI 60.00 • 00 . 00 • • A109d85 ROUO OF FT LUPTON 9393 01-2111-6361-SOPT 21 . 00 0 21 .00 • • - • • • • • 41 IP 4I WAP200P MELD COUNTY GATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • A109886 ROGERS AUTOMOTIVE INC 196146 61-1945-6940 529. 00 • 529.00 • • A109887 ROYBAL, RUTH 042689 21-6490-6498-dPSI 90. 00 • • 90.00 41 I A109888 SAFEWAY 066888 21-6600-6224-9 34. 75 • • 34 . 75 • • A109889 SAFEWAY STORES INC 066023 21-6600-6222-9 23.94 067165 21-6850-6379-9 9. 17 41 • 33. 11 • • AI09890 SALAZAR; MOSES 042889 21-6490-6398-8PSI 30.00 • 30. 00 • • A109891 SANCHEZ. OSCAR 042889 2I -6490-6398-8PS1 120.00 • 120.00 • 41 A109892 SENTRY FIRE L SAFETY INC 20409 01-2111-63o1-NOPT 12 . 50 • • 12 . 50 • • A109893 SIAS. TEODORO 042889 21-6490-6398-dPSI 120.00 • 120.00 • • AI09894 TODDY' S 27665 21-6480-6379-8 46. 88 • 46. 88 • • • • • • • • • • , WAP200P WELD COUNTY OATS : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A109895 TRANSAMERICA TITLE 928490 11-3190-6397 100.00 928492 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928496 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928497 11-J%90-6397 100.00 92849S 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928638 11-3190-6397 100 . 00 • 928639 11-3190-6397 100. 00 928758 11-3190-6497 100.00 • 928759 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928787 11-J190-6397 100.00 S28825 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928826 11-3190-6397 100.00 • 928828 11-3190-6397 100. 00 • 11300.00 • • AI09896 UN1TEO STATES HELOING INC 816069 19-4130-6220-TP ♦ .25 • - 4.25 • • A109897 UTALPANOO1 STEPHANIE 042889 21-6490-6498-8Y10 39.20 • • 39.00 • • A109898 WASATCH PHOTOGRAPHIC 4256 19-4130-6220-INJ 43.70 • 43 . 70 • • A►09899 11AZEE ELECTRIC 63994 01-1061-6236-CC 94 .50 • 94.50 • • A109900 ZAMORA . REBECCA 042889 21-6490-6398-8YTO 108.00 • • 108. 00 • • A FINAL TOTAL : 482451 .78 • • • • ID • • • • kAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 • AS OF : 04/26/8.1 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRUDECURES HAVE UE€N • COMPLETED UN THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN UN PAGE I THROUGH a , AND • DATED 04/28/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD d£ TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 4 48451.78 . • DATED THIS 1St y F Akia 19 89__, • • - - • DIR R FINAN E AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1st BAY OF Fkt2 1989 . ` NY COMMISSION jON - � P.E EXPHStitSc< co.m%ss' Exr So re 1990 • • 0 • 4.—i NOTARY Pines IC • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • • (APPROVE ) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE : ANO WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Crwteral___ FUND - TOTALING f :8L451. 78 • • DATED THIS 1St UAY OF Mnl. 1989 . COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • • 1 rJ • ) \. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • 1 • - cs„...44,,int_ac MEMBER McMaLR• „-;?e, _ . MEMBER MEALIER• • • • • 0 IP • -wg ID ID IAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1ID AS OF : 04/26/89 ID WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 5829619 HESS, STANLEY; DOS I2-4439-6718-MISC 91 .67 91867 • • 5629620 TAYLOR, JUDY 12-4439-6718-MISC 20.00 . 20.00 • • S829621 CENT THERAPEUTIC LEARNING 12-4441-6710-REG 1 ,000.00 ID ID 1 ,000 .00 --- • • 5829622 CHILD ABUSE RES G ED INC 12-4441-6710-REG 860.50 ID 860. 50 ID 582962) DIST ATTY JUVENILE DIVIS 12-4441-671O-REG 5,524 .45 • 5,524.45 S . 5829624 GONZALES, VIRGINIA 12-4441-6710-REG 250.00 • S 250.00 ID ID 5829625 HOLTZMAN . AGNES 12-4441-6710-REG 250.00 12-4441-6710-REG 250.00 • • 500.00 ID 411 S829626 LEWIS. SHIRLEY E . 12-4441-6710-REG 250800 12-444;-6710-REG 250.00 ID 411 500 . 00 411 ID 5829827 MANN, DENNIS C. 12-4441-6710-REG 196 .68 12-4441-6710-REG 250 .00 ID 12-4441-6710-REG 250 .00 ID 696 .68 ID ID • ID ID ID lill WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 e AS OF : 04/26/89 ID WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • e 5829628 NELSON; MARTHA 12-4441-6710-REG 250 .00 ID 250.00 e III 5829629 PARTNERS INC . 12-4441-6710-REG 86723. 00 e • 86723.00 • e 5829630 ROTH. SALLY 12-4441-6710-REG 57.37 ID 12-4441-6710-REG 250.00 e 12-4441-6710-REG 250.00 ID 557 .37 e e 5829631 WELD MENTAL HEALTH CENTER 12-4441-6710-REG 247.50 e 247 . 50 . e 5829632 BOULDER CNTY SHERIFFS OFF 893850 12-4411-6359 12.60 II • 12.60 ID e 5829633 ORATION' S 001383 12-4410-6210 7 . 52 12-4411-6210 3. 84 II 12-4410-6210 17 . 10 e 001382 12-4410-6210 20. 16 12-4410-6210 11 .52 ID 12-4410-6210 8.84 e 001385 12-4410-6210 1 .92 12-4410-6210 . 72 ID 12-4410-6210 15. 75 e 001389 12-4410-6210 25.20 12-4410-6210 .31 e 12-4410-6210 1 .36 e 12-4410-6210 1 .68 12-4410-6210 1 .35 ID 12-4410-6210 2. 50 e 12-4410-6210 . 12 001380 12-4410-6210 17 .64 e 12-4410-6210 1 .57 e 12-4410-6210 5. 20 Ill e III • • • ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 0 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 i AS OF : 04/26/89 ID WARRANT PAYEE INUOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 0 NUMBER NUMBER FL DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • i - S829633 ORATION'S 001380 1244106210 4. 76 12-4410-6210 11 . 22 • 001387 12-4410-62 ►0 15 . 16 0 12-4410-6210 2 .40 12-4410-6210 20.20 0 001481 12-4410-6210 1 . 58 i 12-4410-6210 8. 16 12-4410-6210 9.18 0 12-4410-6210 13.60 0 001384 12-4410-6210 31 .95 12-4410-6210 12 . 60 • 001388 12-4410-6210 7 .02 0 12-44106210 ♦5.78 12-4410-6210 1 . 35 • 12-4410-6210 1 . 35 0 12-4410-6210 21 .60 12-4410-6210 19.20 4, 12-4410-6210 5 .01 0 378.22 • ID $829634 BUSINES. CLUB 12-4410-6356 507. 40 • 12^4410-6356 10.00 i 517.40 i $829635 BUSKE1 GARY 12-4411-6359 911 .96 • ID 917.96 i i 5829636 CHILL ABUSE RES 6 ED INC 12-4410-6357-CA 2.441 .67 0 2 ,441 . 67 i 0 S829637 CHILTON CREDIT REPORTING 881108 12-4411-0456 55.00 0 55.00 . 41 5829638 COLO DEPT SOCIAL SERVICES 12-4410-6421 237.69 0 12-4410-6311 1 ,05b. 12 i 1 .294 .41 0 0 • i i IP w • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 o WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 41 AS OF : 04/26/89 , WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT o NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 087 PROJ AMOUNT 41 • 5829639 COOK, UONALD M.O . 12-4410-6192-CONS 81 . 25 81 . 25 0 0 5829640 CENTRAL STORES 12-4410-6321 565. 32 41 12-44106321 456 .96 , 922 . 28 41 41 5829641 COLO OEPT SOCIAL SERVICES 12-4410^6356 135. 61 41 - ^ _135.61 41 o 5829642 EMPIRE DISPATCH 12-4410-6533 20.95 41 12-4410-6533 20.95 0 41 .90 41 • S829643 FRONTIER BUSINESS PROD 058282 12-4410-6210 97.98 , 12-4410-6210 98 , 20 41 - 12-4410-6210 3 .00 003402 12-4410-6460 368 .00 • s 567 . 18 _ 41 41 5829644 GREELEY LOCK G KEY 031225 12-4410-6366 36.92 12-4410-6366 261 .60 41 12-4410-6366 121 .00 0 12-4410-6366 35. 00 12-4410-6366 52.00 41 12-4410-6366 19.50 532 .02 0 5829645 LEASEAMERICA CORPORATION 660389 12-4410-6940 361 .80 • 361 .d0 0 41 $829646 LOGAN COUNTY SHERIFF 12-4410-6359 5.28 • s • • • i I.i _ ID MAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE t 5 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMUER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 5829646 LOGAN COUNTY SHERIFF 5 . 28 • • 5829647 MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF 12-4411-6159 5.40 • • 5. 40 • • 582964d NORTH COLO MEDICAL CENTER 12-4411-6391 17 .00 12-4411-6391 17 .00 • 12-4411-6391 17 .00 • 61 .00 • • 5829649 RODMAN' DERRALO 12-4410-6359 279 .20 • 12-4411-6359 674 . 20 • 953. 40 • • 5829650 SHERIFF OF PRIMERS COUNTY 000190 12-4411-6359 7 .50 • • 7.50 • --- • 5829651 SILLS' THERON G . M. D. 12-4410-6357-CONS 130.00 • 130.00 • • 5829652 POSTMASTER 12-4410-6311 5 ,000.00 • 5 ,000 .00 • • 5829653 POSTMASTER 12-4410-6311 413.d5 • • 411. 85 • • 5829654 N.C. FOSTER PARENT ASSOC. 12-4410-6335 150 .00 • 150.00 • • • • • • • • O ' WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • S829655 WELD COUNTY SHERIFFiS 890022 12-44116359 5.00 • 5.00 • • $829656 XEROX CORPORATION 850210 12-4410-6940 93.98 • 12-4410-6620-NR 26.84 850209 12-4410-6940 137 .73 • 12-4410^6620-NR 39.34 • 297 .89 • • 5829657 PETTY CASH 12-4410-6210 4. 26 • 12-4410-6210 4 .00 • 12-4410-6210 7 .99 12-4410-6210-NR 4 . 76 • 12-4410-6210 7 .01 • 213.02 • - - '- • 5829656 PRESO-MATIC LOCK COMPANY 12-44106223 21 . 00 • . 21 .00 • • S829659 PITNEY dOWES INC 607408 12-4410-6533 109.50 • 109. 50 • • S829660 SCHAEFER REHAB CNTR 009541 12-4410-6311 47 .42 • 009550 12-4410-6311 50.55 009622 12-4410-6311 36.07 • 009631 12-4410-6311 22.46 • 156.50 • • S829661 ANDREA SUE ALANIZ 12-4449-671O-CSUC 279 . 00 • • 279.00 ID ID 5829662 LEDIA MARTLNEZ ALANIZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 146 .00 • • • e ID • i • • MAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT UUMBCH WARRANI • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OUJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 5b29662 LEDIA MARTINEZ ALANIZ 146. 00 • • 5829663 BERTHA ARCHULETA 12-4449-6710-CSUC 150 . 00 • • 150 . 00 • 5829664 REBECCA ATENCIO 12-4449-6710-CSUC 166. 84 • 166. 84 • • 5829665 DORIS JEAN BEREN 12-4449-6710-050C J50 .00 • J50.00 • • 5829666 LAURA BETTS 12-449-6710-CSUC 50.00 • • 50. 00 • • 5829667 SHARON ULAIR 12-4449-6710-050C 85 .00 • 85.00 • • 5829668 EVELYN BRYANT 12-4449-6710-CSOC 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829669 JULINDA KAY BREWER 12-4449-6710-CSUC 4b . 15 • • 46. 15 • • 5829670 LSOPW CSU IC64062711 I2-4449-6710-CSOC 230.00 • 230 . 00 • • 5829671 VIVIAN MARY CORNEJO 12-4449-6710-CSOC 214 . 00 • 214 .00 • • • • • • , 4I S WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 e AS OF : 04/26/89 e WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT e NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT e 41 S829672 JOANNE CHARLENE CRUZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 28.04 • 28.04 e e 5829674 OUROTHY JEAN EVLG 12-4449-6710-CSOC 190.50 e I90.50 41 41 5829674 TERRI JEAN FOOSE 124449-6710-CSOC 77. 00 e 41 77 .00 e e 5829675 RITA GARCIA 12-4449-6710-CSUC 225 ,00 • 225. 00 e e 5829676 BARBARA GUAJARUU 12-4449-6710-CSUC 107.86 41 107.86 • e 5829677 JUANITA HERNANDEZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 76.67 e e 76.67 e e 5829678 MARIA HERNANDEZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 210.00 • [10.00 e e 5829679 SHELLY HOTIELL 124449-6710-CSOC 66 .00 e 66.00 • • 5829680 COLLEEN LECHNAN 12-4449-6710-CSOC 100.00 e e 100 . 00 e e 582968! MARY ANN L0PEZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 450.00 e 41 41 • • 0 Ill ID < WAP200P WELD COUNTY OAT€ : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD OEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 5829681 MARY ANN LOPEZ 350.00 i O 5829682 DARUARA LUCERO 12-4449-6710-05UC 100 .00 41 • 100.00 41 • 5829683 WELD CU OS5 12-4449-6710-05UC 50 .00 • 50.00 41 • 5829684 TERRY MC CORKLE 12-4449-6710-CSUC 168.74 • 168. 74 O 5829685 BIANCA MEDINA 12-4449-6710-CSOC 150 .00 • 150.00 • e 5829686 PAUL SMIOT SR 12-4449-6710-CSOC 75 .05 • 15. 05 • 5829687 VICTORIA ELOISE PIRIA 12-4449-6710-CSUC 75. 00 4D 75. 00 . 5829688 ANGIE REYES 12-4449-6710-CSUC 75.00 • 75.00 • • 5829689 JUANITA R1VtRA 12-4449-6710-CSUC 30 .00 • 30.00 • 5829690 NOEMI RODRIGUEZ 12-4449-6710-CSUC 156 .00 0 156.00 • 41 • • ID ID • MAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 087 PROJ AMOUNT • • 5829691 PHYLLIS RUDISILL 12-4449-6710-GSUC 87.50 • 83 .50 • • S829692 MILDRED ROLL 124449-6710CSOC 212.50 • 212.50 • • S629693 ROSALINDA SANDOVAL 12-4449-6710-CSOC 76.00 • • 76 .00 • - • 5829694 GLORIA SANTOPIETRO I2-4449-6710-CSOC 75. 00 • 75.00 • • 5829695 CAROL SWARTWOUT 12-4449-6710-CSOC 720.00 • 320. 00 • • 5829696 DEBRA TRILL 12-4449-6710-CSOC 50.00 • • 50.00 41 ID 54829697 BETTY TREJO 12-4449-6710-GSUC 40.00 • 40.00 • • 5829698 LIOIA VARGAS 12-4449-6710-CSOC 210.00 • 210.00 • • 5629699 GERALOIt1E idALLRCE 12-4449-6710—CSOC 57. 70 • • 57. 70 • • 5829700 WELD CO OSS FOSTERCARE 12-4449-6710—CSOC 30.00 • • • • • • ID M WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 11 ID AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID • 5829700 WELD CO OSS FOSTERCARE 30. 00 • e $829701 MURGAN CO 055 12-4449-6710-CSDC 216.00 • • 216.00 O i 5829702 JOSIE DELGAUILLO 12-4449-6710-CSUC 74 .00 • 74.00 • 5829703 WELD CO 05$ FOSTERCARE 12-4449-6710-CSDC 74 .00 • 74. 00 I • S629704 CANDACE HUBBARD 12-4449-6710-CSDC 138.00 • ID • 136.00 • e 5829705 WANDA LARSJN I2-4449-6710-CSOC 196 .00 • 196.00 • 5829706 CLERK DISTRICT COURT 12-4449-6710-CSOC 72.00 ID 72 .00 • ID 5829707 CLERK DISTRICT COURT 12-4449-6710-CSUC 51 .00 ID ID 51 .00 • 582970d JERRY SALE'S 12-4449-6710-CSDC J6.00 • 36.00 ID • 5829709 ANNA N ABUSE) 12-4448-6370-LEAP 22.40 0 22 .40 • IP • 0 • • ill Ill WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : l2 e AS Of : 04/26/89 e WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT e NUMBER NUMBER ID DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT e e 5829710 RUST AhSON 12-4448-6770REG 30.40 • 30 . 40 e e 5829711 PENNY AXTON 12-4448-6370-REG 31 . 20 e J1 . 20 • e 5829712 JOHN BATCHELOR 12-4446-6370-REG 42. 10 e 41 42 . 10 e 4 5829713 CHERYL A BOLTZ 12-4448-6370-REG 164 . 60 • 164 . 60 e e 5829114 EARLENE BOURNS 12-4448-6370-REG 5 . 70 e 5. 70 • e 5829715 JACQUE BOX 12-4448-6J70-REG 114 .00 e e 114. 00 41 e 5829716 ELISABETH BRAUN 12-4448-6370-REG 164 .49 e 164. 49 e e 5829717 BOBBIE BURKE 12-4448-6370-REG 63. 10 e 63. 10 • e 5429718 PAT CHASE 12-4448-6370-REG 283 .00 e e 283.60 e el 5829719 MARLYS DAUGHERTY 12-4448-6370-REG 12 .80 e e e e ID 4, • e WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY GATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 13 • - AS Of : 04/26/89 • UARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT . NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • o S829119 MARLYS DAUGHERIY _ 12. 80 • • S829720 JOANN DELAFUENTE 12-4448-6370-IU-D 49.50 41 s 49. 50 • • 5829721 LINDA DENNIS 12-4448-6170-REG 196.65 • 196.65 • • 5829722 MARILYN ELLIOTT 12-4448-6370-REG 38. 64 • - 38.64 • 0 5829723 CHERYL E EVER 124448-6370-AEG 11 . 40 • • 11 . 40 • • 5829724 JANE A HARRIS 12-4448-6370-REG 79 .00 _ • 79. 00 • • 5829725 JOYCE HAUSE 12-4448-6470-REG 261 . 30 • 261 . 3041 . 5829726 FAWN HOOLEY 12-4448-6370-REG 145. 20 • • 145.20 • • S629727 SANDRA L HUWETH 12-4448-6370-REG 118 . 20 • 118 . 20 • • 582972d SHERRI KEIL 12-4448-6310-REG 6. 10 • 6 . 20 • • • • • ID A A - WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 14 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • S829729 PEG KIRKPATRICK 12-4448-6370-REG 97 .40 • 97 . 40 • • S829730 DAVID L CAWLEY 12-4448-6370-REG 181 .40 • - 181 . 40 • • S829731 CHARLES LINDE 12-4448-6370-REG 21 .60 • . 21 .60 • 5 - 5829732 LORRAINE MARTINE2 12-4448-6370-AEG 114.20 • 119.20 • • 5629733 JOE MATTHEWS 12-4448-6370-AEG 28 . 14 • 28.14 • • S829734 EUGENE MCKENNA 12-4448-6370-REG 102.00 • • 102.00 • • 5829735 LESLIE MILLER 12-4448-6370-REG 109 .95 • 109. 95 • • 5829736 VIVIAN MIRABAL 12-4448-6370-REG 24 .00 • 24. 00 • • 5829737 SHARON E MOODY 12-4448-6)70-REG 89.45 • • 89 , 45 • • 5829738 LINDA MOORS-LARSON 12-4448-6470-REG 69.55 • • • • • • ID 41 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 15 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NURSER NUMBER FO DEPT ODJ PROD AMOUNT • e 5829738 LINDA MOORE-LARSON 69. 55 • • 5829739 MARIAN PELZER 12-4444-6370-RtG 90.60 • • 90.60 • • 5829740 MARIAN PENFOLD 12-4448-6470-REG 10. 25 • 70. 25 • • 5829741 FRANKIE PERDUE 12-4448-6370-RtG 70.20 • 70.20 • • , 5829742 ELIZABETH RICE 12-4448-6370-REG 32 .20 • • 32 . 20 • • 5629743 RICHARD ROWE 12-4448-6370-REG 24 .75 • 24. 75 • • 5829744 MARIA SCHOPEN 12-4448-6370-REG 205 .60 S 41 205. 60 • 5829745 COLLEEN SCHOTT I2-4448-6170-REG 184. 10 • • 184 . 10 • • 5829146 JIM SHEEHAN 12-4448-6J70-LEAP 23.CO • 23.00 • • 5829747 DAVE SIANG 12-4448-6370-REG 60480 S 60480 • • • • ID s WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : l6 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OUJ PROJ AMOUNT • • $829748 PATRICIA A TERRIERE 12-4448-6770-REG 37 .tl0 • 37 .80 • • 5829149 EDWARD TNOMPSON 12-4448-6770-REG 35 .00 • 35.00 • 5829750 LANNA L THUROW 12-4448-6370-1V-D 6 .50 • • 6 . 50 • • 5829751 CAROL TRACY 12-4448-6370REG 44 .45 • 44 .45 • • 5829752 MAYCEAN WORLEY I2-4448-6370-1U-O 14 .25 • 74 . 25 • _ • 5829753 PATRICIA YOUNG 12-4448-6370-kEG 142 .90 • • 142 . 90 • • 5829754 ROSI ANSON 12-4446-6360-S02d 26.45 - • 26. 45 • • 5829755 DANIEL M FOWLER I2-4446-6340-S028 64.90 • 64 . 90 • • • FINAL TOTAL : ♦4 , 761 . 2U • • • • • • • • • 1 1 41 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 17 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 16 , AND • DATED 04/26/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE II el AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 1. 44`987.28 • DAT@U THI __J k_ DAY OF 19 89__. • DI TO F FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __Le __ DAY OF iL 19$9L___. • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES :Altra6A4 21-1rtha^j.i299 • •II _4 aI - -_ • NOTARY IC • WE, THE SOAR() OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • • (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE, AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED ORAWN UPON • THE Sa aL_Senviaat FUND - TOTALING t__24,,.781,Z1 . • DATED THIS _j, __ DAY OF ___May15F9___. II �� //////�� • COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY • 41 ___c" r2)Jl4}l.tSl�__(_.( s4,}'..4.14,0-, • ) DEPUTY ��^,�- CHAIRMAN • % ,!3,l6JSll�.c • MEMBERC�wE�.L'.� MEMBER •IP v etc/ MEMBER ` MEMDER • IP • • • • • 41 IllID WWP952PA WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/26/89 • COIN WARRANT REGISTER REPORT PAGE : 109 • PAYROLL DATE 05/01/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND DUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 108 I AND • DATED 04/26/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPCClIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH !HE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 342,479.00 . • DATED THIS 1s1t DAY 0 / Mag 19 89 -_ . • OIRE TOR 0 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIUEU AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1St DAY OF IkS 19 89 . 0 - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Cornmisskn Elptrcclure8, 1990 . • 0 _ __TALA-212 . • NOTARY ;tall • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • • (APPROVE ) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE ____AOpjgfGlSfryiQg,s FUND - TOTALING $_zg2_ (z2 QQ • • DAT 'D THIS _jg,t __ DAY OF _gay 1919 ___ . ID av,A,YetAvaj 41 COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • // j • • i l_ DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • IP MEMBER 2 MEMBER c-127 ill __Set--ga4t. , vb•` MEMBER Z� MEMBER • • • • • • • • ID 41 WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 Ill NARRANT REGISTER PAGE : I ID AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT O • A169901 AAA TRAVEL AGENCY 343505 21-6920-6373-9 J78. 00 ID 378.00 . • A109902 AGLAND INC J0907 61-9020-6245 5 ,943.05 . 24705 01-1061-6340-ROAD 186. 38 38117 01-1061-6340-ROAD 93.15 • 38123 01-1061-6340-ROAD 91. 15 Ill 6,315.73 ID 0 A109901 ALLMED. GERALD 042889 21-6540-6398-9 784. 00 4 - G 784 . 00 ID • A109904 AMERICAN BUSINESS 62825 52-5530-6322 205.00 • 205.00 . ID A109905 ATE, 490920 67-1192-6513 65 . 76 491301 67-1192-6533 156, 13 ® 667218 67-1192-6360 972.40 • 1 ,194.29 • ID A109906 &ASSURE , BILL D. DR. 5T0003 21-6690-6358-9 600.00 • 600.00 Ill • A109907 BAUER RICHARD M 542271 01-2111-6220-INVT 6, 44 . • 6.44 • A109908 BRISTOL G ROBINSON PROP 1336V4 24-9044-6397-4715 173.00 • 1336V5 24-9044-6397-4715 325.00 • • 498. 00 • II ID ID 0 0 ID • MAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 0 AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE iNVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • ' NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 0BJ PROJ AMOUNT • 0 A109909 BROOKMAN. JOHN 2289W4 24-9034-6397-4715 306.00 • 306.00 0 • 4109920 CATHOLIC COMMUNITY ST8903 21-6760-6358-8 400. 29 • 038951 21-6810-6358-9 3 ,001 .00 • 3 ,401 .29 • • AI09911 CENTRAL BANK OF DENVER 5361 01-9020-6350 250.00 41 • 250.0 • • A109912 COLO CHILORENS CAMPAIGN 600K2 19-4130-6322-TP 10.00 . 10 .00 • • A109913 COLO DEPT OF HEALTH PETSO4 19-4170-6599 20.00 • 20. 00 0 • 4109914 COLORADO DEPT OF REVENUE FLIC24 19-4170-6599 260. 00 0 • 260.00 s • A109915 COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY CCSUA 21-6650-6335-9 200. 00 • 200.00 • 0 A109916 COTTONWOOD TRAVEL COMPANY 43002 19-4140-6370 194.00 • 194.00 0 • A109917 DILL, RICK WCOP89 01-2110-6370-ADM 6.00 0 • 6.00 • • • • • • • l i i I .. ID • WAP200P WELO COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT O84 PROJ AMOUNT • • AI09918 DUNHAM MARY MI0416 65-1191-6370 21 .40 • 21 .40 • s • 4109919 FLIETHMAN, KIM 29578 01-2111-6220-NOPT 13.60 • 13.60 • • 4109920 FRITO LAY INC. 420589 86-2311-6250-COMM 105. 85 • • 105. 85 z • 4 - A109921 GLEN WALL INS. PJ0489 21-6380-6380-d 120.00 • 120.00 • • A109922 GRANO JUNCTION HILTON1THE SUM89 01-1021-6370 188.00 • 188.00 • • A109923 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 5U889 19-4110-6333 78.00 • 688040 01-1154-6337 48.00 • 126.00 • • s 4109924 GREELEY GAS CO 021754 21-6590-6340-9 388.00 • 042689 01-2330-6340 102. 15 • 490. 15 • • A109925 GREELEY X-RAY GROUP PC 106622 19-4140-6350-T8 112.50 • CD 112. 50 • • A109926 HELLING, SUSAN 2021 d8-2112-6210-POSE 40. 00 • 30.00 • • • • • • • ID 4I WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 41 AS OF : 04/27/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 41 NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT O8J PROJ AMOUNT • 41 A109927 HOLIDAY INN 06d1J3 21-6490-6373-8 165.60 356032 21-6490-6373-8 24.95 • 41 190. 55 • 41 A109928 HUBBARD; CANDACE APR89 01-1021-6370 12.00 • 12 , 00 41 • A109929 HUNNICUTT 6 ASSOCIATES O4250S 01-1041-6229 25.00 • 25.00 •41 A109930 INFCRMATION ACCESS 52754A 52-5530-6322 84. 88 •41 84.88 • • A109931 JEROMC CO 812455 86-2311-6250-COMM 88.06 • 88 ,06 • I 41 A109932 JORDAN, EDWARD L. 418749 01-2110-6370-ADM 52.20 • 52.20 .41 A109933 KATHRINE , HAZEL M10489 21-66006375-9 16. 40 • 050489 21-6600-6222-9 20.33 41 36. 13 41s A109934 KEIRNES1 RICHARD W. 0424M1 01-1041-6370 37 . 38 • o 37. 38 41 • A109935 KEYMEN AGENCY CL1844 24-9034-6397-4716 411 .80 CL1863 24-9034-6397-4715 71 .28 • 41 484 .08 41 • 41 • • Ill WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : S • AS OF : 04/27/89 - • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A109936 MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE RETREA 19-4130-6350-INJ 400 .00 • --- 400.00 • • A109937 MARTINEZ, WILLIAM 347829 01-2111-6361-SOPT 57. 36 • • 57.36 • A109938 NORTH COLA MEDICAL CENTER 031350 19-4140-6350-HIV 57.00 • 135080 19-4140-6220-CDP 590. 00 • • 647 .00 • A109939 NORTH COLORADO CENTER ON 03895T 21-6510-6358-9 11 .25 © • 11 .25 • • A109940 PATIENT ADVOCACY TEAM 1764U4 24-9044-6397-4715 143.00 1764115 24-9044-6397-4715 226.00 . 369.00 _ • • A109941 PETTY CASH BLDG 6 GRNDS 018658 01 -1061-6236-CC . 79 10181 01-1061-6360-CC 3.21 • 10186 01-1061-6360-CC .99 • 103017 01-1061-6360-CC .89 10310 01-1061-6360-CC .89 • 10433 01-1061-6360-CC 2.56 • 10457 01-1061-6360-CC 4.36 19 01-1061-6360-CC 2.00 • 3905 01-1061-6236-CC 2.21 • 5482 01-1061-6360-CC 3. 75 • 95776 01-1061-6360-CC 8. 28 • 29.93 • • A109942 PISANA3 FRANCISCO 042889 21-6540-6398-9 155.00 • 155.00 • • • • • • • :• 0 WAP200P WELD COUNTY GATE : 04/27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A109943 PONCELOW, KENNETH 541607 01-2111-6220- INUT *6.00 • 16.00 • o 410994♦ PONY EXPRESS COURIER ♦75299 19-4170-6350-W 10. 00 • 10. 00 ID s • AI09945 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 20321 01-1061-6344-SOCO 138.81 • 33259 01-1061-6340-ROAD 16.82 • 4240 01-1061-6340-ROAD 7.68 82411 OI-1061-6341-MPSC 2.65 892 01-1061-6341-HRD 1 ,496.43 • 96353 01-1061-6341-SOLO 393.69 • 2 ,056.08 • • A109946 RADIO SHACK 82180 52-5510-6212 21. 95 • 21 .95 ID • A109947 RADISSUN INN 000308 01-1014-6370 31 .64 • • 31 . 64 • • A109948 RAMOS; JIM 042889 21-6540-6398-9 267 .92 • 267.92 • • A109949 ROCKENJACH , ROCKY R 25-9071-6397-L 1 .06 • 1 .06 • • IDA109950 SAPPINGTON; ROY 042889 21-6540-639d-9 40.00 IP 40.00 • 0 A109951 SCHMIDT• JUDY M60411 19-4170-6370-E 59.26 • • • • • 11 ID ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 • AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 0 4109951 SCHMIDT, JUDY 59. 26 • A109952 SCHNEIOER, CAROL A MI0489 01-3400-6370 - 243. 22 • • 243. 22 • • A109953 SCHOOL DISTRICT 16 CM0002 21-6490-6358-8Y 3,138. 19 • 4 , 138. 19 • • AI09954 SHEERAN' JIM ML0489 24-9033-6370-4150 120. 70 • 120.70 0 • 4109955 SPECKMAN WALTER J MI0424 21-6920-6372-9 135. 50 • 097819 21-6920-6777-9 208 .00 0 343 . 50 • • 4109956 STANLEY DENNIS 583419 01 -2110-6315- INCS 5.58 ID 5.58 • 0 A109957 UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSN 17470 01-1061-6340-ROAD 28.81 • 28.81 • • A109958 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 901665 67-1192-6345-LO 139. 36 • 902353 67-1192-6345-LOCL 23.06 902520 67-1192-6345-LOLL 213.52 • 902627 67-1192-6345-LOCL 35.52 • 9132661 67-1192-6345-LOCL 37. 58 • 926212 67-11926345-LOCL 137. 38 • 580 .42 • 0 A109959 UARALLO, MICHAEL A. 223204 24-9044-6397-4715 717 .00 • • • • ID • . WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE S 04/27/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : d • AS OF : 04/27/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • e ® A109959 VARALLO. MICHAEL A. 717.00 IP AI09960 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 2933 88-2112-6220-AUXL 10.00 • 2944 19-4110-6599 6. 00 • 16.00 4I IP A►09961 WELD SAFETY COUNCIL REGFEE 19-4130-6335- LNJ 20.00 20100 • • A109962 YAMPA VALLEY MALL PROD.CO 92989 52-5510-6337 29.95 • 29.95 • • A109963 LEHRBACH. DENISE 042889 21-6540-6398-9 71 .00 • • 71 .00 ID • FINAL TOTAL : 26.339. 95 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 0 /27/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 • AS OF : 04/27/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 8 t AND • DATED 0 /27/890 AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD 8E TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES , WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT f_ 26�?t39A5 . i • DATED THI ..._ 18_ DAY F __ Mali 19 89__. • -DIR 0 F ANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _ 1St DAY OF May i98Qi___. • MY COMMISSION EKPIRES::,(JjySznwusicas rccJs+n.B,_It • NOTARY P • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO, HEREBY • • ( APPROVE ) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE : AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE General FUND - fOiALING S 262339.95 • • DATED THIS 1st DAY OF Maa 19 89 . • • COUNT'77Y LERK AND RECORDER BY • • 1 DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • 41 41 MEMBER MEMBER r 41 -Aff ' ' et-eel MEMBER MEMBER • . • • • • • • z 7 A WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/213/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 04/26/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A109964 ABBOTT LABORATORIES 0J4106 19-4170-6220-LSTD 599 .00 • 599,00 • • A109965 ACHZIGER , LYLE 042589 602160-6370 80. 75 • 80.75 • • A109966 ADVANCED MICROCOMPUTER 4158 65-1191-6948 160.00 • • 160.00 • • A109967 AGLAND INC A27419 I1-3140-6371 281 . 71 A27465 [1-J140-6371 259.33 • 837516 11-3140-6371 408.72 • C26830 11-3140-6371 ♦08.72 J0906 61-9020-6246 2,968.48 • 110131 11^3140-6J71 867. 88 • 110132 I1-3140-6771 157.77 110135 11-3140-6371 1 ,017.44 • 110153 11-3140-6371 357 .61 • 6 ,727 .66 • • A109968 ALLIED SURGICAL SUPPLY 166495 I9-4170-6250-GNRL 32.50 • • 32.50 • • A109969 ANDERSON REPORTS (THE) 16793 01-1041-6229 540.00 • 540. 00 • • A109970 ART HARDWARE 38090 01-3162-6229 102.89 • 102 .89 • • A109971 ASPEN PUBLISHERS , INC . 5&4890 60-2160-6220 8 .50 • • 8.50 • • • • • • ID • . WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 e AS OF : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT II NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • e A109972 ASSOCIATED NATURAL GAS LTR 34-1944-6910-NOCC 101220.00 • 10 '220 .00 e - • 4109973 BECKMAN1 DON STM 341944-6920-PRUB 18660.00 e - 1 ,660 .00 • • A109974 BIG R OF GREELEY 57492 01-1061-6235-CC 10. 92 Ill • 10 .92 e • 4109975 BRATTON'SI INC 01439 01 -2310-6210-PROS 5.00 01525 01-2110-6220-CIUL 7.20 ID • 12 .20 • • A109976 BURCH, JILL 041589 79-4140-6147 54. 75 042189 79-4140-6147 62 .50 • 8 79-4140-6147 34.00 _ • 149.25 • e 4109977 CALICO INDUSTRIES, INC 116402 21-6850-6229-9 191 .64 ID • 191 .64 • • A109978 CARSTEN' S HEALTH LNOUS. 773616 01-2310-6220150P 640.21 • 640 .21 e • A109979 CITY OF GREELEY STM 15-1944-6920- 1SGR 2 ,400.00 e 28400 .00 • ID A109980 CITY OF THORNTUN RE0519 01-1011-6JJ5-AL2 20.00 • 01-1011-6145-U1 20.00 e 40.00 • • ID • • • Ill • WAP200P MELD COUNTY OATS : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • AS OF : 04/28/09 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT UBJ PROD AMOUNT • • 4109981 CLARK BOARDMAN CO LTD 09007J 01-1012-6229 90. 25 • 90. 25 • • A109982 CURER PRINTING 15206 19-4170-6220 21 .00 • 21 .00 ID A10998J COUNTRY GENERAL 406628 01-3182-6229 19.20 • 662761 11-3141-6229 29.b4 • 662612 11-3141-6229 243.96 • 292 .80 • • A109984 CUULLFFE CHUCK 049560 79-1014-6143 37. 65 • 049960 79-1014-6143 7.00 049970 79-1014-6143 17.50 • 62. 15 • • 01419485 CUYTIN MATHESCN SCI INC 300034 01-2118-6220 27.59 304364 01-2l18-6220 8.56 • 306627 01-2118-6220 188. 44 • 224.59 ID • A109986 E. LICHT COMPANY 25993 01-2118-6220 36.67 • • 36. 67 • • A109987 E.M.S.L. 1926 01-2118-6220 102.85 • 102 .65 • • 4109988 EATON FINANCIAL CORP. 42789 77-5110-6610 68. 38 • 77-5310-6620 13. 10 • 61 .48 • • • • 0 • • • WAP200P HELD COUNTY DATE 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 • AS OF : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A109989 EMERY MEDICAL SUPPLY 335949 19-4170-6250-GNRL ♦4. 54 • 44. 54 • • A109910 FAULKNER , PRISCILLA 03589E 79-4140-6143 6 .00 • 3150 79-4140-6143 16.80 • 24.80 • • A109991 FLATIRON PAVING CO 10808 11-3190-6471 21260.55 • 2 .260. 55 • --- • AI09992 GENERAL LAWNMOWER 1646 01-1061-6360-CC 19.90 • • 19.90 • A109994 GRAFF . MARILYN 0427MI 01-1041-6370 56.00 • 56.00 • • A109994 GREELEY PLAQUE o TROPHY 12297 21-6850-6320-9 20.55 • 20.55 • • 41 A109995 GREELEY PRINTING CO C7622 01-1031-6210 101 .60 • 41 101 .60 • • A109996 HARUOR SERVICE CURD. 171780 01-2410-6220-ISOP 522. 20 • 522. 20 • • A109997 HIGGINS HARDWARE 12567 01-1061-6235-CC 45.44 • 45.44 • • • • • • • • • MAP200P MELD COUNTY GATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 • AS OF : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A109998 MULTI ENGRAVING 160308 01-2110-6225-TRNG 11 . 00 160327 0L-2110-6225-1RNG 5. 50 • • 16.50 • 41 A109999 1SBILL ASSUCIATES 117504 77-5320-6950-AIP4 15 ,534. 51 • 15 ,534.51 • • A110000 J. GARLIN COMMERCIAL FUR- 218602 21-6950-6940 1 ,485.00 • 227001 21-6950-6940 1 ,760.00 • 3 ,245.00 S _ • A110001 JAEGER, FREE, H. 042589 77-5300-6374 175. S9 • 77-5310-6374 175. 58 • 351 . 1? • • A110002 JEROME CO H12680 86-2311-6250-COMM 21 . 50 • 21.50 • A110004 JOHN WILEY E SONS, INC 338318 OI-1012-6229 45.90 • 344353 01-1012-6229 40.90 • 86. 80 . A110004 JOHNSON, MARK 0, 042689 60-2160-6940 198.48 • 198.48 • • AII000S JONES - WININGER 38 34-1944-6920-AULI 491 .60 • 391 . 60 A110006 K-MART 907084 01-2310-6220-ISUP 269.04 • - 907085 01-2310-6220-15UP 87.40 • II • 0 ID • 1 • r ' WAP200P MELO COUNTY OATS : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • ' AS OF : 04/28/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT Ill NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 080 PROD amount ID • A110006 K-MART 356. 44 II • AI10007 KAPLAN SCHOOL SUPPLY CURP 405486 21-6600-6224-9 68.23 • w 68.23 • • A110004 KING SOOPERS 679420 01-2330-6222 247.18 • 247. 18 ID • A110009 KOMAC PAINT E DECORATING 26102 01^1061-6234-CC 28.20 0 26126 34-1944-6920-5HUP 64. 80 • 93.00 i • 4110010 LATTIMER. MARY 12470 60-2160-6599 53.48 • 53.48 • • 4110011 MASTER LEASE CORPORATION 100589 77-5100-6345 29.98 • 17-5310-6345 29.97 59. 95 • ID Al10012 RATA. EDNA L . 003 79-1152-6147 50.00 • • 50 .00 II A110013 MEOICARC 042589 60-21006599 190.45 • 190 .45 ID • A110014 MILLER. MIKE 04564F 79-2110-6143 45.67 ID 048620 79-2110^6143 52.37 048870 79-2110-6143 18.71 • 049730 79-2110-6143 3.73 0 120.48 • 41 • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS UP : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 4110015 MONFORT OF CO 10795 60-2160-6599 185. 60 • 185.60 • • 4110016 MORTON PUBLISHING CO. 30982 60-2160-6370 2.50 • 2. 50 • • A110017 NATIONAL COMMODITY ANU 88-3 01-1012-6229 37.00 • • 37.00 • • A110018 NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE 33189 77-5300-6358 28.75 77-5310-6358 28.75 • • 57 .50 • • A110019 OFFEN ACE HARUWARE 10309 01-1061-6234-CC 17.96 • 17.96 • • A110020 PADRON. MARGARET 014 79-1152-6147 100.00 • 100.00 ID • 4110021 PATTEN ELVIN a 048650 79-2310-6143 64.00 • • 64.00 • • A110022 PETTY CASH - H II O APRIL 21-6570-6311-8 26.50 • 26.50 • • A110023 PRLCt LYNN 046720 79-1191-6143 69.21 • 4110 79-1191-6147 50.00 4111 79-1191-6147 50.00 • 4112 79-1191-6147 50 .00 • 429456 79-1191-6143 45 .00 • • • • • • o • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 • AS OF : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT 0DJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A11002J PRICE LYNN 264.21 • • A110024 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF CULO 000014 77-5300-6341 169.21 • 04032♦ 77-5300-6341 17.82 • 050214 77-5100-6341 11 .52 19006A 77-5300-6341 24.39 • 22010A 77-5300-6341 7.43 • 25029A 77-5300-6341 11 .95 27017d 77^5300-6341 2.57 • 30011A 77-5300-6341 24.41 • - 40002A 77-5100-6341 30. 55 440174 77-5310-6341 2 ,57 • 51218A 77-5300-6341 7 .65 • 51416A 77-5300-6341 11 .95 53015A 77-5300-6441 13.75 • 54013* 77-5300-6341 35.04 • - 550108 77-5300-6341 2.61 56018A 77-5300-6341 5.57 • • 378.01 • • A110025 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 60037* 77-5310-6341 186.06 70044A 77-5310-6341 ♦5.01 • d0016A 77-5310-6341 5. 14 • 80050A 77-5310-6341 47.59 82015A 77-5310-6141 17. 80 • • 301.60 • • Ai10026 RICK'S APPLIANCE PARTS 034229 01-1061-6236-CC 25 .07 • 25.07 • • A110027 RUSSELL' CAROL J. 0960 79-1021-6147 100.00 • 300.00 • • A110028 SALSER. JOANNE 042889 21-6540-6398-9 186.00 • • 186.00 • • • • • • . . ID ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 AS OF : 04/28/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PROD AMOUNT • A1t0029 SCHNEIDER GLENDA 31 79-4140-6147 390.00 • 390 .00 • • A11O030 SNYDER1 LILLIAN L. 5189 77-5300-6610 750. 61 ID 77-5300-6620 300.05 • 1p050.66 • At10031 SWANK' JED 041889 60-2160-6940 22. 57 • 22.57 • - 41 A110032 TACKER JEANNIE 05 79-6950-6147 595.00 • — • 695.00 • • a A110033 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS PH0489 Ot-2180-6310 63.77 • 63.77 a • A1100J4 WARDEN DONALD 049050 79-1151-6143 26.50 049060 79-1151-6143 26.50 049530 79-1151-6143 26.50 • • 79.50 0 At10035 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 2949 21-6510-6373-9 270.00 2950 21-6600-6373-9 260.76 • • 530.76 • 0 FINAL TOTAL : 53.345. 87 • 0 I • 0 • • 41 ID . o o'` WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 • AS OF : 04/28/d9 • • THIS I5 TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 9 t AND • DATED 04/28/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD DE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT ia345_87 . • DATED THIS 1St DAY OF _Mu'�,_ 19 8?__. • • _ _12% ,r7 c____ • DIREC OR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED ANO SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1st DAY OF 2'141- 19__8,9„_. • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : My Commission TxoiresJunet. 1990 . • / • S_Lia-a--471.4-1 ale • NOTARY PU LIC • WE, THE BDARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO1 HEREBY • • ( APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVEi AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • - THE General FUND - TOTALING i U..,y3&& • • DATED THIS 1St DAY OF Maw 19 _$,0_• COUNTY ERK AND RECORDER BY • • 1 DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • MEMBER echraiti4 MEMBER •40 dee & 6'42-iME _t // MEMBER • • • • 0 AD NWP9S2P° WELD COUNTY DATE : 04/28/89 • COIN WARRANT REGISTER SUMMARY REPORT PAGE : I • PAYROLL DATE 0 /28/89 41 • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETE° ON THE AUDVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE IL THROUGH 6 i AND 0 DATED 04/26/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE 41 • AMOUNTS SLT OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 144.144. 00 . • DATED THIS _ ltt DAY OF me 19 89 __. 41 DIRECTOR - F FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED ANU SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1St DAY OF Mzj 1989 . • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Commtuton elPltSla91-Fpp3. • • • �� • NOTARY I c' e WE. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO; HEREBY • • (APPROVE) ( DISAPPROVE ) THE CLAIMS AS SET FURTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAAN UPON • THE Social Services FUND - TOTALING I 14,144.00 • 0 DATED THIS 1St DAY OF -__Ma - 1989 . 41 w.Vecuktul 41 COUNTY CL K ANO RECORDER BY • ') •__ _1:71ca1LtL,---i 1;42l<sJ • % DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • • axissktk-kit. - MEMBER MEMBER • • „,..,4__,,,....,- MEMBER MEMBER // • t • • • • • 0 5/1/19 ,pp AEC() (4A 4 UNITED STATES 4 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION m ` WASHINGTON,D.C.20555 • 0a� April 19, 1989 ° Docket No. 50-267 Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. ; Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations !fit "S' Public Service Company of Colorado APR2 6 1989 ! l t� Post Office Box 840 Ils Denver, Colorado 80201-0840rascaar. coca. I Dear Mr. Williams: L„ 111,45SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRAUE 'PkUW(AM ( ISU )) ( IAC NO. 56565) Please find enclosed a copy of the Technical Evaluation Report (TER) concerning the TSUP as completed by our contractor, EG&I3 Idaho, Inc. This report contains the detailed evaluation of the proof and review copies of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Program as submitted by your letters dated May 27, 1988 and June 14, 1988. In view of the changes Public Service Company of Colorado has proposed in your letters dated December 5, 1988 and January 20, 1989, the staff decided that the TSUP TER should be released to you. This would serve as an aid in developing a suitable set of defueling Technical Specifications. At this time, the TER should be considered es a working draft. The staff will in general accept the findings of the TER, but still would conduct a review of your proposed defueling Technical Specifications against the proof and review copy submittals. If there are any questions about this (ratter, please contact me at (301) 492-1333. Sincerely, a ) i Kenneth L. Meitner, Project Manager Project Directorate - IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure: As stated cc w/enclosure: See next page %i 6/At Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Albert J. Maxie, Director Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Control Division Public Service Company Department of Health of Colorado 4210 East 11th Avenue P. O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80220 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Mr. David Albersteir, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Fort St. Vrain Services Manager, Nuclear Production GA International Services Corporation and Station Manager Post Office Box 85608 Public Service Company of Colorado San Diego, California 92138 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Resource Mr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Management Division Quality Assurance Division Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. 0. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. 0. D. Hock U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission President and Chief Executive Officer P. 0. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Commitment Control Program Public Service Company Building Coordinator Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 200-D Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80211 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington. Texas 76011 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 a EGG-NTA-8124 , October 1988 TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT Idaho INTEGRATED TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR National REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRAIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Engineering UPGRADE PROGRAM Laboratory Managed D. L. Moses by the U.S . C. Stachew Department A. C. Udy of Energy AEGcG»�. Prepared for the U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Work performed under DOE Conosct No, DE-AC07.76/007570 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government,Neither the United Sates Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use,or the results of such use,of any information,apparatus,product or proc• ess disclosed in this report,or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights, EGG-NIA-3124 INTEGRATED TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRAIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRADE PROGRAM Docket No. 50-267 0. L. Moses J. C. Stachew A. C. Udy Published October 1988 Idaho National Engineering Laboratory EG&G Idaho, Inc. Prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, O.C. 20555 Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-761001570 FIN No. 06023 ABSTRACT This EG&G Idaho, Inc. , report evaluates the submittals provided by Public Service Company of Colorado for the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program. The evaluation combines work done at Oak Ridge National Laboratory by Dr. Dave Moses with the work done at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. FOREWORD This report is supplied as part of the "Technical Assistance for Operating Reactors Licensing Actions" being conducted for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. by EG&G Idaho, Inc. , NRC Regulatory and Technical Assistance. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission funded the work under authorization B&R 20-19-05-02, FIN No. D6023. Docket No. 50-267 TAC No. 56565 ii CONTENTS ABSTRACT FORWARD LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Chronology of Major Steps in the Technical Evaluation Process 2 1.2 Concerns of 1984 Assessment Report 4 1.3 Ground Rules for Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) 6 1.4 Redirection of Technical Specification Upgrade Program 7 1.5 Highlights of Meetings and Correspondence on the TSUP 9 1.6 Status of Out-of-Scope Items 16 1.6.1 Plant Protective System Setpoint 17 1.6.2 Generic Letters 83-36, 37 18 1.6.3 LCO 4.1.9, Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise 19 1.6.4 Appendix R, Fire Protection 20 1.6.5 Inservice Inspection 20 1.6.6 Category F Comments Relating to Technical Specification Bases 21 2.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 23 2.1 Summary of Methodology 23 2.1.1 New Versus Old Mode Definitions 24 2.1.2 760'F Calculated Bulk Core Temperature Concept 27 2.1.3 Reviews Done of FSAR Revisions 29 2.1.4 Relationship of TSUP to TS Improvement Project 30 2.1.5 Safety Related Cooling Functions 31 2.1.6 Reevaluation of Design Basis Accident No. 2 (Rapid Depressurization) 33 2.1.7 Electrical System Review 36 2.2 Generic Evaluation Methodology 37 iii 2.2.1 Specification Carryovers from Existing TS 38 2.2.2 Specifications Adapted from STS 41 2.2.3 Specifications Having Additional Safety Analyses Justification 44 2.2.4 Specifications Affected by Conversion of Interim Amendments to TSUP Format 45 2.3 Plant Specific Technical Specifications Evaluation Methodology 57 3.0 EVALUATIONS 59 INTRODUCTION 59 1. DEFINITIONS 59 2. SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 62 2.1 Safety Limits 62 2.1.1 Reactor Core Safety Limit 62 2.1.2 Reactor Vessel Pressure 64 2.2 Limiting Safety System Settings 64 2.2.1 Setpoints 64 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 66 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY 66 3/4.1 REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS 68 3/4.1.1 Control Rod Pair Operability 69 3/4.1.2 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems 70 3/4.1.2.1 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems-Operating 70 3/4.1.2.2 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems-Shutdown 71 3/4.1.3 Shutdown Margin 71 3/4.1.4 Control Rod Worth and Position Requirements 72 3/4.1.4.1 Control Rod Worth and Position Requirements-Operating 72 3/4.1.4.2 Control Rod Worth and Position Requirements-Shutdown 73 3/4.1.5 Reactivity Change With Temperature 74 3/4.1.6 Reserve Shutdown System 75 iv 3/4.1.6.1 Reserve Shutdown System--Operating 75 3/4.1.6.2 Reserve Shutdown System--Shutdown 76 3/4.1.7 Reactivity Status 79 3/4.2 CORE IRRADIATION, TEMPERATURE AND FLOW LIMITS 80 3/4.2.1 Core Irradiation 80 3/4.2.2 Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Region Outlet Temperature Limits 80 3/4.2.3 Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Comparison Regions 81 3/4.2.4 Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise 82 3/4.2.5 Region Constraint Devices 83 3/4.2.6 Power-to-Flow Ratio 84 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 85 3/4.3.1 Plant Protective System 85 3/4.3.2 Monitoring ',Instrumentation 88 3/4.3.2.1 Analytical Moisture Monitors 88 3/4.3.2.2 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation 89 3/4.3.2.3 Seismic Instrumentation 90 3/4.3.2.4 Meteorological Instrumentation 90 3/4.3.2.5 Fire Detection and Alarm System 90 3/4.3.2.6 Chlorine Detection and Alarm System 91 3/4.3.2.7 Power-to-Flow Ratio Instrumentation System 92 3/4.3.2.8 Core Region Outlet Thermocouples 93 3/4.3.3 Three Room Control Complex Temperature Monitoring 93 3/4.4 PRIMARY COOLANT 94 3/4.4.1 Primary Coolant Loops and Coolant Circulation . . . . 94 3/4.4.1.1 Primary Coolant Loops and Coolant Circulation - Above 5% Power 94 3/4.4.1.2 Primary Coolant Loops and Coolant Circulation - Below 5% Power 95 3/4.4.2 Primary Coolant Activity 96 3/4.4.3 Primary Coolant Impurity Levels--High Temperature 97 3/4.4.4 Primary Coolant Impurity Levels--Low Temperature 97 3/4.5 SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SYSTEMS 98 3/4.5.1 Helium Circulators 98 v 3/4.5.1.1 Helium Circulators--CBCT above 760 98 3/4.5.1.2 Helium Circulators--CBCT below 760 98 3/4.5.2 Helium Circulator Auxiliaries 99 3/4.5.2.1 Helium Circulator Auxiliaries--CBCT above 760 99 3/4.5.2.2 Helium Circulator Auxiliaries--CBCT below 760 100 3/4.5.3 Steam Generators 100 3/4.5.3.1 Steam Generators--CBCT Above 760 100 3/4.5.3.2 Steam Generators--CBCT below 760 101 3/4.5.4 Emergency Condensate and Emergency Feedwater Headers 101 3/4.5.4.1 Emergency Condensate and Emergency Feedwater Headers--CBCT above 760 101 3/4.5.4.2 Emergency Condensate and Emergency Feedwater Headers--CBCT below 760 102 3/4.5.5 Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply System 102 3/4.6 PCRV AND CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS 103 3/4.6.1 PCRV Pressurization 103 3/4.6.1.1 PCRV Safety Valves 103 3/4.6.1.2 Steam Generator/Circulator Penetration Overpressure Protection 104 3/4.6.1.3 Interspace Minimum Pressurization 104 3/4.6.1.4 PCRV Closure Leakage 105 3/4.6.1.5 Steam Generator Interspace Radiation Monitoring 106 3/4.6.2 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling System 108 3/4.6.2.1 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling System--CBCT above 760 108 3/4.6.2.2 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling System--CBCT below 760 110 3/4.6.3 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling System Temperatures 110 3/4.6.4 PCRV Integrity 111 3/4.6.4.1 StrJctural Integrity 111 3/4.6.4.2 Liner 111 vi 3/4.6.4.3 Penetrations, Wells, and Isolation Valves 111 3/4.6.5 Reactor Building Confinement 112 3/4.6.5.1 Reactor Building Confinement Integrity 112 3/4.6.5.2 Reactor Building Exhaust System 114 — 3/4.6.5.3 Reactor Building Overpressure Protection System 115 3/4.7 PLANT AND SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SUPPORT SYSTEMS 117 3/4.7.1 Turbine Cycle 117 3/4.7.1.1 Boiler Feed Pumps 117 3/4.7.1.2 Steam/Water Dump System 119 3/4.7.1.3 Pressure Relief Valves 122 3/4.7.1.4 Secondary Coolant Activity 122 3/4.7.1.5 Safety Valves--Operating 123 3/4.7.1.6 Safety Valves--Shutdown 124 3/4.7.1.7 Condensate Pumps 124 - 3/4.7.2 Hydraulic Power System 125 — 3/4.7.3 Instrument Air System 126 3/4.7.4 Service Water System 128 3/4.7.4.1 Service Water Systems--Operating 128 3/4.7.4.2 Service Water Systems--Shutdown 128 3/4.7.5 Primary Coolant Depressurization 129 3/4.7.6 Fire Suppression Systems 130 - 3/4.7.6.1 Spray and/or Sprinkler Systems 130 3/4.7.6.2 Carbon Dioxide Systems 130 3/4.7.6.3 Halon Systems 131 3/4.7.6.4 Fire Hose Stations 132 - 3/4.7.6.5 Yard Fire Hydrants and Hydrant Hose - Houses 132 - 3/4.7.7 Fire Rated Barriers 132 — 3/4.7.8 SLIMS Valves 133 3/4.7.9 Control Room Emergency Ventilation System 134 - 3/4.7.10 Snubbers 135 3/4.8 AUXILIARY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS 136 vii 3/4.8.1 A. C. Power Sources 136 3/4.8.1.1 A.C. Power Sources--Operating 136 3/4.8.1.2 A.C. Power Sources--Shutdown 140 3/4.8.2 D.G. Power Sources 14I 3/4.8.2.1 D.C. Power Sources--Operating 141 3/4.8.2.2 D.C. Power Sources--Shutdown 143 3/4.8.3 Onsite Power Distribution 144 3/4.8.3.1 Onsite Power Distribution-Operating 144 3/4.8.3.2 Onsite Power Distribution-Shutdown 144 3/4.8.4 ACM Diesel Generator I45 3/4.9 FUEL HANDLING AND STORAGE SYSTEMS 147 3/4.9.1 Fuel Handling and Maintenance in the Reactor 147 3/4.9.2 Instrumentation 148 3/4.9.3 Fuel Handling Machine 148 3/4.9.4 Fuel Storage Wells 149 3/4.9.5 Spent Fuel Shipping Cask 150 3/4.9.6 Communications During Core Alterations 150 3/4.10 SPECIAL TEST EXCEPTIONS 150 3/4.10.1 Xenon Stability 150 5. DESIGN FEATURES 151 5.1 Site 151 5.2 Reactor Coolant System and Steam Plant System 151 5.2.1 Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel (PCRV) 151 5.2.2 Steam Generator Orifices 151 5.3 Reactor Core 152 5.3.1 Reactor Assembly 152 5.3.2 Active Core 152 5.3.3 Fuel 152 viii 5.3.4 Reload Segment Design 152 5.3,5 Reflector 154 5.3.6 Control Rods 154 5.3.7 Reserve Shutdown System 154 5.4 Fuel Storage 155 5.4.1 Critically 155 5.4.2 Containment 155 5.4.3 Neutron Absorber--Heat Sink 155 5.5 Meteorological Tower Location 155 5.6 Component and Transient Cyclic Limit 156 6. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 156 6.1 Responsibility 156 6.2 Organization 156 6.3 Unit Staff Qualifications 157 6.4 Training 157 6.5 Review and Audit 158 6.5.1 Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) 158 6.5.2 Nuclear Facility Safety Committee (NFSC) 158 6.6 Reportable Events Action 159 6.7 Safety Limit Violations 159 6.8 Procedures and Programs 159 6.9 Reporting Requirements 160 6.9.1 Routine Reports and Reportable Events 160 6.9.2 Special Reports 161 6.9.3 Non-Routine Radiological Reports 161 6.10 Record Retention 161 6.11 Radiation Protection Program 162 ix 6.12 High Radiation Area 162 6.13 Process Control Program (PCP) 162 6.14 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (000M) 162 6.15 Major Changes to Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Radwaste Treatment Systems 162 6.16 Fuel Surveillance Program 162 6. 17 Environmental Qualifications 163 6.18 Inservice Inspection and Testing (1SIT) Program 163 7. NOT USED 8. RADIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL 163 4. CONCLUSIONS 164 5. REFERENCES 192 APPENDIX A--SCOPE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE FORT ST. VRAIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRADE PROGRAM A-I TABLES Table 1.5.1 Meeting and Correspondence Summary 9 Table 2.1.1 New Versus Old Mode Definitions 25 Table 2.2 Technical Specification Sections Comment Categoriza- tions, Dispositions, and Documentation 171 x LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS AC Administrative Control ACM Alternate Cooling Method ACN Accession Number AEC Atomic Energy Commission ANS American Nuclear Society ANSI American National Standards, Institute, Inc. ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers BWR Boiling Water Reactor CBCT Calculated Bulk Core Temperature CFR Code of Federal Regulations CPM Counts Per Minute DBA Design Basis Accident OF Design Feature ECCS Emergency Core Cooling System EES Economizer-Evaporator-Superheater EFPD Effective Full Power Days FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report FHM Fuel Handling Machine FSV Fort St. Vrain GDC General Design Criteria GPM Gallons Per Minute HPS Helium Purification System HTGR High Temperature Gas Reactor HVAC Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning INEL Idaho National Engineering Laboratory xi ISA Instrument Society of America ISEG Independent Safety Engineering Group ISI Inservice Inspection ISIT Inservice Inspection and Testing ISS Interlock Sequence Switch LCO Limiting Condition for Operation LOFC Loss of Forced Circulation LSSS Limiting Safety System Setting LWR Light Water Reactor MCA Maximum Credible Accident mCi/CC Milli-Curies per Cubic Centimeter MPT Main Power Transformer MW Mega Watt MWD Mega Watt Oays NFSC Nuclear Facility Safety Committee NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory PCP Process Control Program PCS Primary Coolant System PCRV Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel PDR Public Document Room PORC Plant Operations Review Committee PSC Public Service Company of Colorado PPS Plant Protective System PWR Pressurized Water Reactor xii RAI Request for Additional Information RAT Reserve Auxiliary Transformer RCD Region Constraint Device RDA Rapid Depressurization Accident RPF Region Peaking Factor RTP Rated Thermal Power S STS - "Either the 'as measured' value (in percent span) of the sensor error, or the value from Column S (Sensor Error) of Table 2.2-1 for the affected channel ." SCS Secondary Coolant System SL Safety Limit SLRDIS Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System SSCs Structures Systems and Components STS Standard Technical Specifications SR Surveillance Requirement SRP Standard Review Plan TA STS - "The value from Column TA (Total Allowance) of Table 2.2-1 for the affected channel ." TAC No. Technical Assistance Control Number TER Technical Evaluation Report TS Technical Specification TSIP Technical Specification Improvement Project TSUP Technical Specification Upgrade Program UAT Unit Auxiliary Transformer Z STS - "The value from Column Z of Table 2.2-1 for the affected channel ." xiii i I INTEGRATED TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRArN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRADE PROGRAM 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This evaluation is of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program as documented by Public Service Company of Colorado in their letters of May 27, 1988,1 June 14, 1988,2 and August 5, 1988.3 Prior to these last PSC submittals, the TSUP involved an extensive series of PSC/NRC proposals, responses, documentation, correspondence, meetings, and teleconferences from 1984 through 1988. A complete list of meetings and correspondence is provided in Section 1.5 of this report. The technical evaluation of the PSC proposals was done by the NRC with the use of contractor personnel from the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This present integrated Technical Evaluation Report contains both those portions of the review originally assigned to INEL and those portions assigned to ORNL. Integrated from a previous INEL TER by J. C. Stachew4 are the following TSUP Sections: Definitions, 1 .0, Limiting Safety System Settings, 2.2, Applicability, 3/4.0, Instrumentation. 3/4.3, Fuel Handling and Storage Systems, 3/4.9, Design Features, 5.0. Administrative Controls, 6.0, and Radiological and Environmental , 8.0, The review of the Auxiliary Electrical Power Systems, Section 3/4.8, is integrated from a previous, separate INEL TER by Mr. A. Udy.5 The review of Sections assigned to ORNL, generally Safety Limits, 2.0, Reactivity Control Systems, 3/4.1, Core Irradiation, and Temperature and Flow Limits, 3/4.2, Primary Coolant, 3/4.4, Safe Shutdown Cooling Systems, 3/4.5, and PCRV and Confinement systems, 3/4.6, Plant and Safe Shutdown Cooling Support Systems, 3/4.7, again are integrated from a separate ORNL TER by • Or. O. Moses.6 This report addresses the complete background of the TSUP including the concerns of the NRC 1984 assessment report,7 ground rules for the TSUP, redirection of the program in the Summer of 1986, highlights of all meeting 1 . A and correspondence, status of FSV Technical Specification efforts that are out-of-scope to the TSUP, and the general evaluation methodology applicable to all of the TSUP, as well as evaluation of all TSUP sections. Finally, the Evaluation Section 3 of this report is item by item the same as the TSUP TS1 Table of Contents. 1 .1 Chronoloov of Major Steps in The Technical Evaluation Process The chronology of the major steps in the technical evaluation of the TSUP involved an extensive series of proposals, reviews, responses, correspondence, meetings, and teleconferences. The technical evaluation of the upgrade to the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications began in 1985 by the NRC Staff. In early 1986, contractors from the INEL and ORNL were involved in the review, and the review continued through 1988. The first major PSC proposal was the initial draft TSUP of April 1, 1985.8 The NRC Staff provided PSC with comments in a marked up copy of this draft in May of 1985. Subsequently a meeting was held during July 22-26, 19859 at which most of the NRC Staff concerns were resolved. Issues remaining from the July meeting were assigned as action items to the NRC and to PSC. The NRC clarified the issues to be treated as part of the scope of the TSUP and those to be treated independently outside the scope of the TSUP in their letter of August 28, 1985.10 Action items issued during the July meeting were responded to by the NRC in a letter dated October 22, 1985,11 and by PSC in Attachment 3 to the letter (P-85448) dated November 27, 1985,12 which also transmitted PSC's final draft of the TSUP of November 1985. The NRC submitted extensive formal comments on the final draft TSUP in • Enclosure 3 to the letter dated May 30, 1986,13 and summarized the status on the other remaining open issues (NRC and PSC Action items and other open issues from the July 1985 meeting) in Enclosures 1, 2, and 4 of the same letter. As stated in Section 1.3 of this report, the NRC's May 30, 1986 comments were viewed by PSC as causing the TSUP to diverge from resolution. NRC/PSC meetings were held on October 1, 2, 198614 and October 27-30, 198615 to categorize the disposition of NRC's May 30, 1986 comments. 2 Two major areas of review were split off from the main current of the _ TSUP. These were the review of the Safety Related Cooling Functions and the Auxiliary Electric Power Systems. The NRC Staff submitted comments on the Auxiliary Electrical Power Systems in the February 18, 198716 minutes to the NRC/PCS meeting of December 18, 1986 on the same subject. Also, on — April 27, 198717 the NRC Staff submitted comments on the Safety Related Cooling Functions proposal of PSC of February 28, 1986. 18 PSC submitted on February 20, 198719 a major documentation of the dispositions reached on the TSUP in response to the NRC May 30, 1986 letter and the related meetings of October 1 and 2. 1986 and October 27.30, 1986. A comprehensive review of the PSC submittal of February 20, 1987 and of all preceding correspondence resulted in further NRC Staff comments and requests for additional information being submitted May 6, 198720 and July 2, 1987.21 Meetings between the NRC and PSC occurred again on August 25 and 26, 1987,22 December 2 and 3. 1987,23 and March 15 and 16, 198824 to continue resolution on the Safety Related Cooling Functions, Auxiliary Electric Power Systems and the NRC RAI of July 2, 1987. Teleconferences were held on April 18, 1988,25 April 26, 1988,25 May 18, 1988,26 and July 13, 198827 to further review the outstanding issues. PSC made a formal response to the Safety Related Cooling Function issues on December 23, 1987.28 On February 2, 1988,29 PSC made a formal response to the RAI of July 2, 1987. On March 8, 1988,30 PSC supplemented the formal response to the RAI of July 2, 1987, and on March 22, 1988,31 PSC made a formal response to the issues on the Auxiliary Electric Power Systems. On May 27, 1988,1 June 14, 1988,2 and August 5, 19883 PSC combined all of the information from the previous submittals and simultaneously addressed all remaining issues including close out of proposals made informally in handouts at the preceding meetings, and conversion to the TSUP of all the interim Technical Specification amendments that had been issued during the entire TSUP review process. This summary chronology of the technical evaluation process of the TSVP is provided as a concise overview of the entire process. Greater detail of • the process may be found in the following sections of this report. 3 1.2 Concerns of 1984 Assessment Reuss. The NRC Staff letter of October 16, 19847 identified from an earlier audit that the FSV Technical Specifications required substantial improvements to resolve problems that had been experienced over the past several years. Because of the extent of the problems, the Licensee already had developed a program to upgrade the entire set of technical specifications. The NRC Staff recommended that a high priority effort be undertaken to achieve such improvement on a schedule committing the Licensee to completion of the review, revision, and submittal of the Technical Specification upgrade by April 1, 1985. As a result of the noted onsite audit during the week of July 9, 1984, by members of the NRC Staff, substantial improvement was needed to (a) correct deficiencies in content (omission of limits and surveillance requirements), (b) improve clarity (Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) subject to various interpretations], and (c) correct errors. Some highlights of the major areas of concern detailed in the report were as follows: a. Not all LCOs had a corresponding Technical Specification surveillance requirement, and conversely not all surveillance requirements corresponded to an LCO (see Table 5.2 for comparison). b. In the surveillance sections there were many instances where the acceptance criteria for the surveillance were not in the Technical Specifications but rather were in the surveillance procedures. In these instances changes to surveillance requirements and associated acceptance criteria could be made through procedure change without NRC review. c. Many items that should be included as LCOs (and typically are in LWR Technical Specifications) were not in the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications. The absence of these items left gaps in the control and monitoring of key safety parameters. 4 d. In some instances existing surveillance requirements were found to be incomplete. Incomplete surveillance requirements could lead to concerns on the operability of safety systems. e. There was a lack of clarity in certain areas of the Technical Specifications. f. In some cases it was not clear when an LCO applies. There were no defined operational modes applied to the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications such as in the LWR Standard Technical Specifications. Therefore, in certain LCOs (for example, LCO 4.4.1, "Plant Protection System Instrumentation"), the conditions under which equipment must be operable or when parameters must be maintained within limits were not clear. g. Some LCOs have been subject to varying or case-by-case interpretations (for example, LCO 4.1.2 regarding when a control rod is considered operable) . In several instances this had led to disagreements between NRC and the licensee over whether or not the licensee was in compliance with the Technical Specifications. For example, in assessing compliance with Surveillance Requirement 5.1.1, there had been disagreement between NRC and the licensee over which control rods require periodic exercising while at power. h. Some limits that should be LCOs were contained in the "Bases" sections (for example, the "Bases" section to LCO 4.1.3 contains the control rod worth limits). All limits should be in the specifications, not in the "Bases" section. • i . Certain items. in the Technical Specifications were incorrect. Detailed examples illustrating the above problem areas were provided. The Licensee was requested to review and evaluate the findings and determine what follow-up actions to take. 5 1.3 Ground Rules for Technical Specification Uoarade Proaram (TSUP) Ground rules for the TSUP were arrived at by discussions and meetings between the NRC Staff and Public Service Company of Colorado. By letter dated November 16, 1984,32 the Licensee committed to the Technical Specification upgrade recommended by the NRC Staff. By way of clarifying and defining the scope of the proposed Technical Specification Upgrade Program, the Licensee's letter, Attachment 1, identified the scope of the program in fourteen commitments,. and Attachment 2 identified seven guidelines for the utilization of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS),33 see Appendix A to this report for the guidelines. While addressing the problem areas identified by the NRC Staff, the Licensee primarily intended to upgrade the accuracy, completeness and clarity of the existing FSV Technical Specifications consistent with the licensing basis as embodied in the FSAR. Plant modifications, backfits, issues which open the licensing basis, further analysis or analytical investigations, significant research or development efforts would not be undertaken to permit adoption of any STS requirement. In instances where FSV Technical Specification requirements introduce a safety concern relative to STS requirements, these instances would be addressed as separate licensing issues outside of the scope of the TSUP. This Licensee proposal was discussed between members of the NRC Staff and PSC at a meeting at the Fort St. Vrain site on November 29 and 30, 1984. The agreements reached at the meeting were documented by the NRC in their letter of December 20, 1984,34 see Appendix A to this report. Seven changes and clarifications were identified in this NRC letter. ANS Standard 58.4 (1979 Edition), "Criteria for Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Stations" and the STS for Westinghouse pressurized water reactors were to be used as guidance for the Technical Specifications content. Bases for the Technical Specifications were to be included and a review of the FSV FSAR and other relevant design documentation as well as operating experience was to be made to ensure the completeness and correctness of the Technical Specifications. Subsequently, clarification was made that the "bases for technical specifications" as covered in the TSUP scope was meant to refer to the "summary statement of bases or reasons" per 10 CFR Part 50.36(a) and not the FSAR analysis and evaluation per Part 50.36(b). 6 1.4 Redirection of Technical Specification Unorade Proaram In the summer of 1986 after the NRC had reviewed and commented on the initial TS draft of April 19858 and the final draft of November 1985, 12 significant differences emerged between the NRC and PSC as to the direction being taken in the TSUP. A series of discussions, correspondence, and meetings ensued to bring back together the directions being taken. Earlier, however, the TSUP direction was satisfactory. An NRC marked up copy of the April 1985 draft of the TS was returned to PSC in May 1985 followed by NRC and PSC Staff meetings from July 22 through 26, 1985, to discuss the NRC findings. In the letter dated August 28, 1985,10 the NRC Staff clarified the issues to be treated as part of the scope of the TSUP and those to be treated independently outside the scope. Subsequently, action items issued during the July meeting were responded to by the NRC in letter dated October 22, 1985,11 and by PSC in Attachment 3 to the letter (P-85448) dated November 27. 1985,12 which also transmitted PSC's final draft of the TS of November 1985. In the late fall of 1985, there was a change in the NRC Staff who were performing the TSUP review. Also, contractor personnel from the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory were brought in beginning February 1986 to aid in the review. As a result of this latest review, the NRC transmitted extensive formal comments in Enclosure 3 to the letter dated May 30, 1986,13 on the final draft TS of November 1985 and summarized the status on other related issues (NRC and PSC Action items from the July 1985 meetings). After review of the NRC formal comments, PSC requested and met with the NRC on June 27, 1986 to discuss their concern that the TSUP appeared to be diverging from resolution. The meeting minutes35 and PSC's initial written response36 to the NRC formal comments identified PSC's concerns as follows: o The large number of requests for additional documentation, especially on reactor physics; 7 u i J o Many requests for FSAR changes potentially beyond the licensing basis; o The need for additional justifications (including deviations from Standard Technical Specifications) ; o Potential backfits; and o Changes from earlier NRC guidance. Subsequently, meetings were held on October 1 and 2, 1986 and October 27 through 30, 1986 between the NRC and PSC to disposition PSC's concerns on the TSUP. As a result of these meetings the 404 comments were categorized14 for disposition into groups as follows: Number of Comments Category 100 A incorporate as is in PSC hand-outs 42 A# PSC action item 145 8 No action needed 23 C PSC to explain in proposed amendment safety evaluation 22 D PSC/NRC discussion needed to resolve 11 D• NRC action item 11 E No further discussion planned 50 F Further discussion possible (but not in the scope of TSUP). As a result of the categorizations of the 404 comments, 61 or about 15% of the comments were "E" or "F" and thus were categorized as outside the scope of the TSUP. Also, the comments on TS Section 3/4.8, Auxiliary Electric Power Systems, were withdrawn for the purpose of an added review by INEL and resubmittal at a later date. It was also agreed in the October 27 through 30, 1986 meeting that the NRC comments on the Safe Shutdown Cooling 8 • Systems15 although part of the TSUP would be handled as a parallel issue that would be integrated into the TSUP as it became finalized. Follow up meetings occurred August 25 and 26, 1987,22 December 2 and 3, 1987,23 and March 15 and 16, 1988.24 1 .5 Highlights of Meetings and Correspondence on the TSUP Because of the extensive correspondence and many meetings involved in the TSUP, the following chronological list is provided as an aid for the material in this report. Only meetings and correspondence between the NRC and PSC are listed. Activities and correspondence internal to the NRC or just between the NRC and the involved contractors is generally excluded. Also certain issues, although part of the TSUP, have been pursued somewhat independent of but parallel to the TSUP. These type issues will be treated subsequently in Section 1.6 of this report. TABLE 1.5. 1 MEETING AND CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY July 9-11, 1984 Region IV and Division of Licensing visit to the site to assess the overall conduct of operation at FSV including Technical Specifications. This assessment initiated by the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (H. Denton) was precipitated by the June 23, 1984 event of the failure of six control rod pairs to insert. August 1-3, 1984 NRC Staff follow-up audit on the overall operation of the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. Again an assessment of the Existing Technical Specifications was one of the major review areas. October 16, 1984 NRC (H. Denton) letter to PSC transmitting preliminary report documenting the assessment of operation of the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. In the area of Technical Specifications, a high priority effort was recommended to substantially improve completeness, clarity, and accuracy. (Public Document Room Accession Number PPR ACN 8410240115] November 16, 1984 PSC letter to NRC to clarify and define the scope of the proposed TSUP consistent with the licensing basis of FSV as embodied in the FSAR. PSC made fourteen commitments on the TSUP program including submittal of a first draft by April 1, 1985. Additionally, 9 a TABLE 1.5.1 (continued) seven guidelines were specified on how the Standard Technical Specifications would be utilized in the TSUP. (PIA ACN 8411280225] November 29-30, 1984 Meeting to discuss PSC's proposed Technical Specification Upgrade Program (PSC's letter dated November 16, 1984 in response to concerns of accuracy, completeness, and clarity expressed in Mr. Denton's letter of October 16, 1984) . PSC committed to a TSUP first draft by April 1, 1985. December 14, 1984 PSC letter to NRC providing TSUP work specification and schedule. [POR ACM 8501030085] December 20, 1984 NRC (E. H. Johnson) letter to PSC to document seven additional clarifications to the TSUP agreed upon in the November 29-30, 1984 meeting. [POR ACN 8501140462] January 29, 1985 PSC letter to R. Ireland transmitting TSUP Sections 2.0, 4.0, and 5.0 (POR ACN 8502110718] April 1, 1985 PSC letter to NRC transmitting the first draft of the upgrade FSV Technical Specifications. PSC adopted the basic format and number system of the Standard Technical Specifications. (PR ACN 8504090221] May 17, 1985 NRC memorandums, Thompson to Denise. May 21, I985 both memoranda provided SE on CROs, with mention of TSUP. (PDR ACN 8510090145, 8510070566] May 28, 1985 NRC letter (E. H. Johnson) to PSC, CR0 meeting summary (from 5/3/85). [PDR ACN 8506060554] June 7, 1985 PSC letter to E. H. Johnson. Provided draft T.S. for CRDs (interim). (POR ACN 8506270519] July 3, 1985 PSC letter to E. H. Johnson. Revised draft T.S. for CRDs (interim) . (DDR ACN 8508020046] July 3, 1985 PSC letter to NRC notifying that the final draft of TSUP to be submitted by October 15, 1985 [POR ACN 8508020048] July 10, 1985 PSC letter to E. H. Johnson. Revised draft interim CR0 T.S. (POR ACN 8507290417] July 11, 1985 PSC letter to E. H. Johnson submitting a revised schedule (by October 15, 1985) for the final draft of the TSUP (POR ACN 8508010065] 10 TABLE 1.5.1 (continued) July 12, 1985 NRC (E. H. Johnson) letter to PSC. SE on CRD interim Specs, with open items. [PDR ACN 8507310076] July 23, 1985 NRC (E. H. Johnson) letter to PSC. SE authorizing restart based on interim CRD T.S. [PDR ACN 8508020039] July 22-26, 1985 Meeting to discuss NRC comments on PSC's April 1, 1985 TSUP first draft. Items requiring either NRC or PSC action were assigned. All other comments from the NRC markup of the April 1, 1985 draft were resolved during the meeting. August 22, 1985 NRC (0. Hunter) letter to PSC documenting PSC and NRC action items resulting from July 22-26, 1985 meeting. [PDR ACN 8509040341] August 28, 1985 NRC (P. Wagner) letter to PSC to specify actions to be included in the TSUP and those to be reviewed independently. [POR ACN 85090503I0] September 20, 1985 PSC letter to NRC revising submittal date for draft TSs for helium circulators. steam generators, and PCRV liner cooling system (safety-related cooling functions) (PDR ACN 8510080001] September 30, 1985 PSC letter to Region IV transmitting draft technical specifications on the safety related cooling functions of helium circulators, steam generators and PCRV liner cooling system. [POR ACN 8510090149] October 8, 1985 PSC letter to NRC committing to provide the final draft Technical Specifications by November 30, 1985. [POR ACN 85I0160075] October 11, 1985 PSC retransmittal of September 30, I985 letter. [PDR ACN 8510160173] October 22, 1985 NRC (E. J. Butcher) letter to PSC transmitting the responses to the NRC action items from the meeting of July 22-26, 1985. Also included was a copy of North Anna's Emergency Diesel Generator Technical Specification as guidance for PSC in preparing the next draft of the TS. [PDR ACN 8510290546] November 27, 1985 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow transmitting the final draft of the upgrade TS. Also transmitted was the response to PSC's action items from the July 22.26, 1985 meeting. [PDR ACN 8512020401] 11 TABLE 1 .5. 1 (continued) December 24, 1985 PSC letter to H. Berkow transmitting errata sheets to the final draft TSUP of November 27. 1985. [POR ACN 8512300081] December 27, 1985 NRC (H. N. Berkow) Letter to PSC responding to PSC's draft LCOs on the safety related cooling functions letter of October 11, 1985. NRC put LCOs in TSUP format and addressed PSC's responses to the action items of the July 22-26, 1985 meeting. [PDR ACN 8601070733] February 28, 1986 PSC response to NRC letter of December 27, 1985 on the safety related cooling functions and action items. PSC made the LCOs consistent with the FSAR and submitted justification for use of a calculated bulk core temperature of 760°F. [POR ACN 8603050288] May 30, 1986 NRC (K. Heitner) letter to PSC transmitting extensive formal comments on the final draft of the upgrade TS as well as statusing of NRC and PSC action items from the July 22-26, 1985 meeting [PDR ACN 8606110215] . June 27, 1986 Meeting to discuss PSC's concern that the TSUP appeared to be diverging away from resolution. Memorandum summarizing the June 27, 1986 meeting. [POR ACN 8607240013] November 19, 1985 NRC (E. J. Butcher) letter to PSC transmitting a proposed schedule for completion of TSUP [PDR ACN 8512060321] December 12, 1985 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow status letter on CRDM testing at 300°F and TSUP review [PDR ACN 8512200051] December 24, 1985 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow commenting on the NRC proposed TSUP in letter dated November 19, 1985 [POR ACN 8512300212] August 15, 1986 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow transmitting PSC's initial response to the NRC comment letter of May 30, 1986. PSC detailed their concerns expressed in the June 27, 1986 meeting that the NRC comments taken at face value would require plant modifications, a change to the licensing basis, reanalysis, and changes from previous agreements. [POR ACN 8608210183] October 1-2, 1986 Meeting to realign the TSUP back to the original PSC and NRC guidelines. Categorization began on the NRC May 30, 1986 comments as basically inside scope 12 TABLE 1.5.1 (continued) (incorporate as is, PSC action item, no action needed. PSC to explain in safety evaluation, PSC/NRC discussion needed to resolve, or NRC action item) or outside scope (no further discussion planned or further discussion possible). October 28, 1986 memorandum summarizing the October 1-2, 1986 meeting categorization of the NRC comments of May 30, 1985. (PDR ACN 8610310008] October 8, 1986 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow responding to NRC's questions regarding the use of non-safety grade boiler feed pumps for 08A-2 [PDR ACN 8610170067] October 27-30, 1986 Meeting to complete categorization of the NRC comments of May 30, 1986. December 15, 1986 memorandum summarizing the October 27-30, 1986 meeting categorization of the NRC comments of May 30, 1986. (DOR ACN 8612290446] December 18, 1986 Meeting to discuss conversion to TSUP of FSV electrical Section 3/4.8. February 18, 1987 NRC (K. L. Meitner) letter to PSC transmitting a summary of the December 18, 1986 meeting and establishing NRC and PSC action items from the meeting. (POR ACN 8702250330] February 20, 1987 PSC letter to H. N. Berkow transmitting agreements reached during the October 27-30, 1986 meeting on resolution to the NRC comments of May 30, 1986. (P0R ACN 8702260180] April 17, 1987 NRC (K. Heitner) letter to PSC transmitting comments on the safety related cooling functions and marked-up draft technical specifications responding to PSC letter of February 18, 1986. (POR ACN 8704280502] April 28-29, 1987 Meeting and teleconference with PSC to status TSUP. Minutes of the April 28-29, 1987 Meeting, dated June 9, 1987 (PDR ACM 8707170012] May 6, 1987 NRC (K. L. Meitner) letter to PSC supplementing information on the electrical section review of the NRC February 18, 1987 letter. (PDR ACN 8705080323] July 2, 1987 NRC (K. L. Meitner) letter to PSC requesting additional information on selected items from the PSC letter of February 20, 1987. (DOR ACN 8707130334] July 2, 1987 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo revising the schedule for responding to the issues discussed in the teleconference of April 29, 1987 (PDR ACN 8707080629] 13 TABLE 1 .5.1 (continued) July 7, 1987 NRC (K. L. Heitner) letter to PSC transmitting proposed schedule for the completion of the TSUP. (PDR ACN 8707130565] August 24, 1987 PSC letter to J. Calvo responding to the action items and the request for additional information on the electrical section review. (PDR ACN 8709080419] August 25, 26, 1987 Meeting to discuss PSC's August 24, 1987 letter on the electrical section review, NRC's RAI of July 2. 1987, and NRC's April 17, 1987 letter on the safety related cooling functions. September 4, 1987 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo providing revised schedule for completion of TSUP areas of Section 3/4.8, Safety-Related Cooling Functions, and NRC RAI of July 2, 1987. October 1, 1987 K. L. Heitner memorandum to J. A. Calvo, summary of the meeting of August 25-26, 1987. (POR ACN 8710080258] November 19, 1987 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo transmitting PSC's responses to safety related cooling function comments in the NRC letters of April 17, 1987 and July 2, 1987. (PDR ACN 8711240214] December 2, 3. 1987 Meeting to discuss TSUP issues of electrical Section 3/4.8, PSC's November 19, 1987 letter on the safety related cooling functions, and the overall TSUP schedule. December 23, 1987 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo, retransmits PSC letter of November 19, 1987 on the safety related cooling functions to reflect agreements reached in the meeting of December 2, 3, 1987. (POR ACN 8712300212] January 12, 1988 K. L. Meitner memorandum to J. A. Calvo summarizing the meeting of December 2-3, 1987 (POR ACN 8801200346]. February 2, 1988 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo, Transmits PSC response to the NRC request for additional information (RAI) of July 2, 1987. [P0R ACN 8802110019] March 7, 1988 NRC (K. L. Heitner) letter to R. 0. Williams, transmits the NRC position on NRC action items (0*) from the December 1-2, 1987 meeting. (PDR ACN 8803150157] 14 TABLE 1.5. 1 (continued) March 8, 1988 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo, supplements the PSC February 2, 1988 letter by addressing other issues of the RAI letter of July 2, 1987. (POR ACN 8803160023] March 15, 16. 1988 Meeting to complete resolution of the RAI of July 2, 1987. (POR ACN 8804120088] April 18, 1988 Teleconference between PSC, NRC, and Contractors to discuss issues resulting from further review of PSC's letters of February 2, 1988 and March 8, 1988 and the handouts of the March 15-16, 1988 meeting (POR ACN 8805170192] April 25, 1988 Teleconference between PSC, NRC, and Contractors to discuss additional changes to the TSUP proposed by PSC. (POR ACN 8805170192) May I8, 1988 Teleconference between PSC, NRC, and Contractors to discuss closure to the issues of the teleconference of April 18 and 26, 1988. [DOR ACN 8806140200] May 27, 1988 PSC proof and review copy of the TSUP upon which this TER is written. [POR ACN 8806010241] June 14, 1988 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo, supplementing the May 27, 1988 letter by providing the justification for all significant relaxations or deletions from the current specifications and some miscellaneous changes. [PUS ACN 8806210009] July 13, 1988 Teleconference between PSC, NRC, and Contractors to discuss issues resulting from further review of PSC's letters of May 27, I988 and June 14, 1988. [P0R ACN 8808050021] July 21, 1988 NRC (K. L. Meitner) letter to PSC transmitting safety evaluation of helium circulator redundancy requirements for the rapid depressurization accident. (POR ACN 8808040353] August 5, 1988 PSC letter to J. A. Calvo, supplementing the May 27, 1988 and June 14, 1988 letters to respond to the issues of the July 13, 1988 teleconference. (FOR ACN 8808150145] 15 1.6 Status of Out-of-Scooe Items Several TS items or issues have been classified to be outside the TSUP scope (Appendix A). These items or issues fall into two categories: i) On-going or parallel efforts that have defined goals that will be incorporated into or otherwise modify the upgraded TS but as a separate final disposition. • ii) Issues or items that have been identified during the TSUP review and evaluation but that have been declared to be subject to potential future requests for additional information or to other action that is yet to be determined. The areas that are being addressed in the first category of activities include: 1) plant protective system setpoints, 2) compliance with Generic Letters 83-36 and 83-37, 3) LC0 4.1.9,, 4) Appendix R considerations on fire protection, and 5) the inservice inspection plan. Although these other issues involve changes to the TS, their evaluation is not restricted by the ground rules agreed to (see Section 1.3 of this report) for the TSUP. Therefore, even though these other areas involve TS changes, they are being pursued outside of but in parallel with the TSUP. In some cases, for example the Generic Letters 83-36 and 83-37 issues, the evaluation has been pursued in concert with the TS changes and upgrade material of the TSUP but the ground rules for the evaluation have been separate from the TSUP. Final disposition of these other areas will be separate from the TSUP. These other areas are only being described briefly here to clarify that they are not part of the TSUP and are being pursued under separate tasks. A summary status of each of these parallel efforts is given below. The second category of cut-of-scope items was generated in response to NRC review comments. These out-of-scope items are the Category F comments that were alluded to in Section 1.3 as being determined to be outside the ground rules of the TSUP but with further discussion possible. As indicated in Section 2.3, 50 comments were designated as being Category F from among { 16 I I I • the initial set of NRC comments on the TSUP final draft. Another 20 comments have been similarly designated from the review of other TS in efforts parallel to TSUP for a total of 70 Category F comments. The Category F comments were basically of two types. Most of these comments relate to the licensing bases for the existing TS either being unclear as given in the FSAR or being absent from both the FSAR and other referable design documentation. The other comments in the Category F classification relate to recent operating experience that is judged not to require the addition of TS at this time but may require reconsideration pending further experience and review. With regard to the first type of Category F comments, the scope of the TSUP did not specifically address the possibility that, when a comprehensive review of the FSAR and other design and licensing documentation is performed to establish completeness of the proposed TS, the result might be that some of the existing carryover TS would be found to lack an adequately documented licensing basis. Thus, the potential need for further FSAR revisions, which might involve additional analysis, was found to be beyond the intended scope of the TSUP. A summary of primary issues relating to the clarity and existence of the TS licensing bases is given below. 1.6.1 Plant Protective System Setooints Accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy in the plant protective system setpoints has been an ongoing activity under review for some time (TAC No. 47416).10 The Licensee's latest amendment request of February 8, 198837 has been reviewed by the NRC Staff. This latest Licensee submittal reflects that the Licensee and NRC Staff reached tentative agreement on all the open issues during a meeting on December 3, 198723. The Plant Protective System Setpoints involve TSUP Sections 2.2, Limiting Safety System Settings Trip Setpoints, and 3.3.1, Plant Protective System.. A separate Technical Evaluation Report was issued by 1NEL38 and was the basis for the NRC approval of the issued Amendment No. 60. As Amendment No. 60 represents a significant improvement in accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpofnt and the allowable value and was approved by the NRC, it was converted to the TSUP 17 format and is part of the TSUP. Therefore, the technical evaluation and acceptance of TSUP Sections 2.2, Limiting Safety System Settings Trip Setpoints and 3.3.1, Plant Protective System, relies on the associated INEL TER.38 Although the Licensee's conversion of the approved Amendment No. 6039 to the TSUP still lacks adequate treatment of several important issues, these issues have been identified (see INEL TER38) and their resolution will be the subject of separate future licensing actions outside the present TSUP. Once resolved, these other PPS issues will be absorbed into the TSUP by separate future proceedings. 1 .6.2 Generic Letters 83-36. 37 The revision of those Technical Specifications related to, NUREG-0737, Technical Specifications, has been under review by the NRC Staff since late 1984 (TAC No. 54535) .10 The Licensee and NRC Staff have gone through several cycles on these issues and the Licensee's latest submittal of May 15, 1987 (P.87133)40 is currently under review. NUREG 0737 action plan items 11.F.1.1, Noble Gas Effluent Monitors and I11.0.3.4, Control Room Habitability Requirements are the remaining open issues. Final acceptability of the TS Sections on these issues will be subject to the outcome of the ongoing review and will be absorbed into the TSUP by separate future proceedings. The TSUP Sections or their November 30, 1986 predecessors on these subjects were the actual sections used in the Generic Letter review and have been judged acceptable for the interim. Since the review of these Technical Specifications related to NUREG-0737 have not been restricted by the guidelines of the TSUP, and the guidance of the Generic Letters has been incorporated into the appropriate STS sections, the review itself was more comprehensive and more than satisfies the intent of the TSUP guidelines. The TSUP sections affected for the Generic Letters 83-36, 37 issues considered closed are: 3.3.2.2 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation 3.5.1 Helium Circulators 3.5.2 Helium Circulator Auxiliaries 3.5.3 Steam Generators 18 • 3.5.4 Emergency Condensate and Emergency Feedwater Headers 3.5.5 Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply System 3.7.1.5 Safety Valves - Operating 3.7.1 .6 Safety Valves - Shutdown 3.7.1.7 Condensate Pumps 6.8.4.C Post Accident Sampling ELCO 8. 1. 1 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent The acceptance of NUREG-0737 Item II.E.1.1, Long Term Auxiliary Feedwater System Evaluation was made by the NRC Staff on the basis that the issues were sufficiently addressed under the safety related cooling function efforts (see Section 2.1.5 of this report) . The TSUP sections for Generic Letters 83-36, 37 issues still considered open are: 3.3.2.6 Chlorine Detection and Alarm System 3.7.9 Control Room Emergency Ventilation System. The acceptance of each of these areas in the TSUP for the interim are discussed in the correspondence evaluation sections in Section 3 of this report. 1 .6.3 LCO 4.1 .9 Core Inlet Orifice Valve$/Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise The revision of this Technical Specification LCO 4.1.9, Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise has been under review by the NRC Staff since late 1983 (TAC No. 52634) .8 The basis for the revision is to reduce the potential for flow stagnation or reversal during low power and low flow operating conditions. The Licensee's latest submittal of April 17, 1987 (P-87124)17 was reviewed by the NRC Staff. Because of its overlapping involvement in the use of the 760'F Calculated Bulk Core Temperature concept, the Licensee submittal of April 17, 1987 on LCO 4.1.9 was thoroughly reviewed for its impact on the 19 TSUP. Review comments involving the impact of LCO 4.1.9 on the TSUP were transmitted to the Licensee by the NRC letter of July 2, 198721 and were resolved by the Licensee submittal of December 23, 198728 on the safety related cooling functions. The NRC Staff approved the revised LCO 4.1.9 in Amendment No. 57 in letter dated November 23, 1987. The conversion to TSUP format of this approved Amendment has been judged acceptable and is treated in Section 2.2.4 of this report. 1 .6.4 Appendix R. Fire Protection The revision of the Technical Specifications for fire protection, LCO 3/4.7.6, Fire Suppression Systems, has been under additional review because of efforts of the Licensee toward complying with Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements. This Generic Letter transmitted information relative to implementation of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix R fire protection requirements. The implementation of the Appendix R fire protection requirements has been ongoing for some time. PSC expects to submit an amendment to delete the fire protection Technical Specifications once their Fire Protection Plan is approved. PSC submitted their Fire Protection Plan for approval by letter dated December 15, 1987.41 In the interim the TSUP Section LCO 3/4.7.6 on fire protection was significantly upgraded and formatted to the TSUP. The acceptance, for the interim, of these upgraded fire protection specifications in the TSUP is discussed in Section 3 of the this report. Any further amendment to the Technical Specifications as a result of acceptance of the fire protection plan will be a separate licensing action from the TSUP review in this report. 1 .6.5 Inservice Inspection The Technical Specifications for inservice inspection have been under review because of efforts to update the Inservice Inspection and Test Program. Two amendments, Nos. 45 and 51, on the ISI were approved during the ongoing TSUP review. These two amendments were converted to the TSUP 20 format in the Licensee's letter of May 27, 19881 and the conversion has been judged acceptable, see Section 2.2.4 of this report. Surveillances on many systems such as the PCRV auxiliary system, PCRV, PCRV internals, and primary coolant system helium circulators were affected by these amendments. PSC is now in the process of writing an ISIT Program Plan which will consolidate FSV's ISIT requirements and identify the included structures, systems, and components.42 Any further amendments to the Technical Specifications as a result of this effort will be separate from the TSUP. 1 .6.6 Category F Comments Relating to Technical Specification Bases During the TSUP review, 70 comments were generated and subsequently designated as Category F, that is, defined as indicating further discussion possible (but not in the scope of the TSUP). The majority of these Category F comments relates to the lack of clarity in or absence of the detailed licensing bases in the FSAR as required to support the existing TS per 10 CFR Parts 50.34(a)(5) and (b), 50.36(b), and 50.71(e) . Although there were four items in the TSUP scope (P-3, P-11, N-2, and N-4, see Appendix A) that relate to assuring the clarity, completeness, and accuracy of the upgraded TS compared against the FSAR and other documentation forming the licensing and technical basis, the NRC judged that the reviewer comments that relate to the clarity, completeness, and accuracy of the bases of carryover Specifications are out-of-scope so as to facilitate completion of the TSUP in a timely manner. Thus, for purposes of the TSUP, the upgrading of the existing TS bases was restricted to format and structural issues of the "summary statement of the bases or reasons for such specifications" as required per 10 CFR Part 50.36(a) and was interpreted not to apply to the more substantive documentation requirements for the FSAR. The issue of clarity, completeness, and accuracy of the detailed bases for the carryover Specifications stems from the TSUP-chartered review6 of two sources: namely, (1) the applicant's safety analyses supporting TS in the original FSV operating license that was approved by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and (2) the licensee's safety analyses for subsequent 21 license amendments that have been approved by either the AEC or the NRC. Both sources should be documented in the current Updated FSAR. Rationale for Acceotinq TS. As discussed in the evaluation of certain of the specifications as given in Section 3 of this TER, the implementation of specifications that utilize or rely upon nuclear design calculations that are not described and verified in the FSAR is subject to review, audit, and, in some cases, approval by the FSV Nuclear Facility Safety Committee under the provisions of TS Administrative Controls. Pending an NRC formal request for additional information to assure the adequacy of undocumented or inadequately documented TS bases per the requirements for detailed analysis and evaluation under 10CFR Parts 50.34(a)(5) and (b) , 50.36(b), and 50.71(e), the NFSC activity per the upgraded TS is judged to be acceptable for assuring both quality in design control per Part 50. Appendix B, and adequate record keeping per Parts 50.59(b)(3) and 50.71(a) and also to be subject to inspection per Part 50.70(a) . In addition to the larger thermal margins and longer thermal response times inherent in ensuring the safety of the FSV ceramic core, compliance with the latter regulations governing NFSC activity is judged to be an additional basis for accepting, at this time, the upgraded specifications that lack a clearly documented licensing basis; however. in the interim, it is also judged that NRC should ensure that the NFSC reviews. audits, and bases for approval adhere to the intent of the NRC and industry guidelines in References 43 through 47, in Section 4.3 of References 54 and 87, and in References 92 and 93 for acceptable engineering practice in core reload design. 22 2.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 2.1 Summary of Methndoloov This section presents an overview of the methodology used in the technical evaluation of the TSUP. Technical evaluation of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program was a long and extensive undertaking that required several major Licensee responses, several major NRC reviews and many meetings and teleconferences with the Licensee. Each Technical Specification section of the TSUP was reviewed individually according to the guidelines summarized in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 of this report. The technical evaluation involved the addressing of additional review complications that result because of the unique Fort St. Vrain gas cooled reactor technology. In addition it was necessary to maintain currency with interim FSAR Revisions, interim Technical Specification Amendments, and ongoing efforts in the generic Technical Specification Improvement Program by the NRC Staff. Of course, the technical evaluation of each TS section conversion to the TSUP was the central issue. To achieve a coherent section by section review the two central structural elements of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications of mode definition and a demarcation criteria for primarily redundancy requirements had to be developed. These developments had to parallel the STS mode philosophy and redundancy demarcation criteria. The mode structure of Fort St. Vrain is built around the settings of the Interlock Sequence Switch and the Reactor Mode Selector Switch. The demarcation criteria for redundancy requirements is built around the concept of a Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760'F. These mode and demarcation criteria are unique to Fort St. Vrain because of the gas cooled reactor technology and lay the basis for the overall conversion philosophy from the existing Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications to the Standard Technical Specifications. In addition to these two central structural elements, it was necessary, because of the long calendar time duration of the TSUP, to address interim FSAR Revisions, interim Technical Specification Amendments, and the NRC Staff TSIP program. With these added review complications addressed, the individual Technical Specification section reviews then fell into two major groupings, generic and plant specific. 23 Under the generic grouping were Technical Specification sections whose technical evaluations were based mostly on precedent such as: carryover from the existing license, adaptation from the STS, acceptance because of added safety analysis/justification, or acceptance because of conversion of an interim Amendment. The second major grouping was of those Technical Specification sections that required plant specific evaluation. That is, the technical basis for acceptance of the section had to be developed from involved considerations of uniqueness of Fort St. Vrain gas cooled reactor technology, STS considerations, FSAR considerations, site specific justifications, or combinations of the above. The following sections 2.1.1 through 2.1.7 address each of the overall additional complications alluded to above. And the following Sections 2.2 and 2.3 address the generic and plant specific evaluations. 2. 1 . 1 New Versus Old Mode Definitions Central to PSC's acceptance of the STS format and structure for the TSUP was the adoption of modes to define the operating and shutdown conditions of the reactor. Although the existing FSV Technical Specifications had definitions of reactor operating and shutdown conditions, the applicability of actual specifications to these defined reactor conditions was often nonexistent or vague. Often applicability was to conditions that were specified within the specification itself. For example, the applicability for ICO 4.1.9, Core Region Temperature Rise, read "whenever the reactor is pressurized to more than 50 psia and the core inlet orifice valves are set for equal region coolant flows." Adopting the STS Mode approach was a significant improvement as concurrently each specification's applicability was to one or more of the defined modes. For comparison purposes Table 2.1.1 summarizes the old and the new reactor operating and shutdown conditions to which specification applicability is made. In the old format, the operational conditions did not have a collective terminology. In the new format, these conditions are designated operational modes as in the STS. 24 TABLE 2.1. 1 NEW VERSUS OLD MODE DEFINITIONS New Conditions Operational Modes Interlock Sequence Reactor Mode Percent Rated Mg49 Switch Setting Switch Setting Thermal Power* Power (P) Power Run >30% Low Power (L) Low Power@ Run >5% and <30% Startup (S/U) Startup Run <5% Shutdown (S/D) ** Off* 0 Refueling (R)*** ** Fuel Loading 0 * Excluding decay heat. ** Interlock Sequence Switch (ISS) may be in any position in SHUTDOWN and REFUELING. ***Includes Reactor Internal Maintenance, see Specification 3/4.9.1. @ The interlock sequence switch setting may be changed to the Power position and power may be increased to no greater than 40% for the purpose of performing surveillances or other tests, for up to 72 hours. without being considered a change in OPERATIONAL MODES. The Reactor Mode Switch setting may be changed for the purpose of performing surveillances or other tests, provided the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted (or as otherwise required for refueling operations or surveillance testing) by a second licensed operator or other qualified member of the unit technical staff. Old Conditions Operatina Conditions Percent Rated Thermal Power Power operation More than 29. Low power operation >10-3% and <2% Startup Not defined Reactor shutdown--no fuel in reactor or hot shutdown reactivity condition reactor mode switch locked "OFF" >220*F >0.01ap shutdown margin (xenon free) Cold shutdown reactivity condition reactor mode switch locked "OFF" • >80"F >0.O1ap shutdown margin (xenon free) Refueling shutdown Reactor mode switch locked in "FUEL LOADING" with either the hot or cold shutdown reactivity condition. 25 • This conversion of FSV to modes introduced differences from the STS because of the fundamental coolant difference of helium gas versus water ano because of the unique relationship in FSV of the Interlock Sequence Switch Setting to reactor trip system applicability. Thus, the 3S0'F, 200'F, and 140'F primary coolant temperatures used in the STS to distinguish the Hot Standby, Hot Shutdown, Cold Shutdown. and Refueling Modes has no obvious carryover to the single phase helium coolant in FSV. 350°F is the temperature below which steam generator cooldown becomes inefficient in PWRs and is also the temperature demarcation for redundancy requirements in the Emergency Core Cooling System. 200'F is the conservative temperature for boiling of water at sea level . 200'F and 275 psig are also the temperature/pressure demarcation for high and moderate energy fluid systems. As these water phase change related temperatures in PWRs have no equivalents in the singe phase helium gas coolant of FSV, unlike PWRs, coolant temperature is not used to distinguish modes at FSV. Also, the FSV Plant Protective System, which includes reactor trip system instrumentation, has an enable/disable strategy which is tied to the position of the Interlock Sequence Switch. In turn, the Interlock Sequence Switch position is interlocked with the Rod Withdrawal Prohibit through reactor power at levels of ≤5%, >5%, and ≤30%, and >30% rated thermal power (see FSV FSAR Section 7.1.2.2) . Thus the FSV mode structure of Startup (≤5% RTP). Low Power (>5% and ≤30% RTP), and Power (>30% RTP) has been tied to these Interlock Sequence Switch positions. It is also tied to the setting of the Reactor Mode Switch (Run, Off, Fuel Loading). As the old TS low power and power conditions had breakpoints at 10'3% and 2% RTP, again conversion of the specifications applicable at power were not straightforward but had to be judged on a case-by-case basis. Since FSV was not susceptible to the usual STS Mode strategy for determining system redundancy requirements, a concept uniquely applicable to the FSV gas cooled reactor technology was developed. This was the concept of the calculated bulk core temperature of 760°F. Below 760°F bulk core temperature redundancy is not required but above 760°F bulk core 26 temperature it is required. As this was a new concept outside the FSV licensing basis, it was treated extensively and will be discussed at length in the next section. 2. 1.2 760°F Calculated Bulk Core Temperature Concept The CBCT of 760°F is a demarcation criterion when primary coolant helium flow may be temporarily suspended for the performance of maintenance activities. The CBCT of 760°F is based on not exceeding the operating design maximum core inlet temperature. With the operating design maximum core inlet temperature not exceeded, there can be no damage to the fuel or Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel internal components regardless of the amount, including total absence, or reversal , of primary coolant helium flow. The upper plenum internal components, including the control rod drive and orifice assembly and thermal barrier, have been designed to be consistent with this temperature environment.48 This was the conclusion reached by ORNL in their independent review of the 760°F CBCT in relation to LCO 4.1.9, Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise (see Attachment 2 to NRC letter of December 5, 198649) which was accepted by the NRC Staff in Amendment No. 57.50 Thus the CBCT of 760°F is a demarcation criterion for the broader concern of when primary coolant helium flow is required for core cooling. The broader application beyond LCO 4.1.9 of the CBCT of 760°F at FSV to the demarcation criteria used in the LWRs is discussed in detail in the following paragraphs. The demarcation criteria for determining ECCS subsystem redundancy requirements (single failure criteria) is a primary coolant temperature of 350°F in the STS. The comparable demarcation criteria for Fort St. Vrain is the 760°F Calculated Bulk Core Temperature. System redundancy in the STS is required for conditions when there is a high energy content in the primary system coolant. High energy content in the primary coolant in PWRs has been associated with primary coolant temperatures of >350'E, when redundancy of the ECCS is required. Between 200'F and 350'F, only one train of ECCS is required in the STS. Below 200°F 27 in the STS, only one train of charging pump cooling is required. Inherent in this STS methodology is that rather slow normal cooldown times are involved so that core decay heat levels have been substantially reduced and, therefore, can be handled by the specified operable cooling systems. In actuality, a demarcation based on core decay heat levels and primary coolant temperature would be more appropriate to ensure adequate cooling as core decay heat plus the immediate coolant energy inventory together determine the cooling requirements. The CBCT concept instituted for the gas cooled Fort St. Vrain reactor in fact does combine the current average core temperature and the core decay heat level to project the time at which CBCT would reach 760°F with interruption of all forced primary coolant flow.48 Comparable to the STS, redundancy of safety related cooling functions is required at FSV for reactor power conditions (Power and Low Power Operational Modes which cover ?5% Rated Thermal Power) without regard to the OCT. The application of the CBCT is to the FSV Startup (≤5% RTP) and Shutdown Operational Modes. In these modes redundancy of safety related cooling functions is required above a CBCT of 760°F but not below. Although, the CBCT is not directly measurable as is the STS 350°F demarcation and further is a calculated projected time based on calculated adiabatic core heatup rate to reach 760'F with interruption of all forced primary coolant flow, the calculational technique is conservative in several respects. Based on operating history at Fort St. Vrain the calculated core heatup rate has always been higher than the actual core heatup rate.48 In addition to its equivalency to the STS 350°F primary coolant temperature demarcation for ECCS subsystem redundancy, the CBCT is also a demarcation as is the STS 350°F primary coolant temperature for system redundancy, single system operability and action statement applicability for many other systems. For example, redundancy in ac and dc power sources as well as onsite power distribution are delineated relative to the 350°F primary coolant temperature in the STS and at FSV by the CBCT. Other examples on system operability requirements (not necessarily redundancy requirements) and on action statement applicability can be found in sections 28 a on the helium circulators, steam generators, boiler feed pumps, service water system, and control room emergency ventilation system. In judging the adequacy of when and how the CBCT was employed, each system specified was evaluated on its own merits with an attempt to reach a good compromise between the operational condition applicability of the existing FSV technical specification and the mode applicability of the STS. In the majority of the systems to which the CBCT was applied in the FSV TS, the mode applicability was extended beyond that specified in the existing FSV T5. The CBCT is usually employed in the FSV TS by designating modes such as Startup and Shutdown with a superscript asterisk and the asterisk then being explained by a footnote with appropriate reference to the 760'F CBCT. For example, the footnotes usually qualify applicability as being either for the the condition of above 760°F CBCT or below 760°F CBCT. In many cases, however, where the 5T5 required applicability down to 200°F (STS Modes I, 2, 3, and 4), the upgraded FSV TS only required applicability to Power, Low Power, and Startup (and sometimes Shutdown) without invoking the asterisk superscript (•) , Thus, in some cases the FSV applicability was not as extensive as the STS (for example, when the Shutdown mode was not specified) and sometimes was more extensive than the STS (when Shutdown was specified). Again acceptance of mode applicability system by system was based on a good compromise between the existing FSV TS condition applicability and the STS mode applicability. 2.1.3 Reviews Done of FSAR Revisions A thorough review of the FSV FSAR and other relevant design documentation was to be done to ensure that the Technical Specifications would be clear, complete, and accurate.34 The Licensee, the NRC Staff, and the contractor reviewers examined the FSAR relative to the Technical Specifications to implement as necessary the guideline of ensuring clarity, completeness, and accuracy. As part of this effort the ongoing FSAR revisions were reviewed. During the evolvement of the TSUP, PSC made four FSAR revisions as required by 10 CFR 50.71 (Revs. 3, 4, 5 and 6). The NRC Staff extensively reviewed FSAR Rev. 3. Those FSAR revision comments that 29 were related to the Technical Specifications were transmitted to the Licensee in Enclosure 1 of letter dated October 22, 198511 and their resolutions were tracked to completion through publication of FSAR Revision 4. Review of FSAR Revisions 4, 5 and 6 did not result in any specific list of comments related to the Technical Specifications as was done for Revision 3 but where discrepancies were noted, they were integrated into the ongoing TSUP meetings and correspondence. Comments on FSAR Rev. 4 by the NRC Staff were transmitted to the Licensee in letter dated November 18, 1986.51 The FSAR was often found to not provide a complete basis for the proposed technical specifications and in other cases required FSAR systems were not reflected in the Technical Specifications. The resolution to these findings were related to the disagreements between PSC and the NRC Staff over the scope of the TSUP guidelines. Resolution of these problems became part of the redirection process discussed in Section 1.4 of this report. Ultimately, resolution was by item by item negotiation with the Licensee as documented in the ensuing meeting summaries and correspondence. 2.1 .4 Relationship of TSUP to TS Improvement Proiell The Technical Specification Upgrade Program for Fort St. Vrain is distinct and separate from the NRC general Technical Specification Improvement Project. As explained in Section 1.2 of this report, the TSUP is unique to Fort St. Vrain and was one of the outcomes of the 1984 Assessment Report.? On the other hand, the Technical Specification Improvement Project is an industry wide program to pursue technical specification simplification. On July 8, 1980, the NRC published in the Federal Register (45 FR 45916) initial considerations for changing regulations on Technical Specifications. Again on March 30, 1982, the NRC published in the Federal Register (47 FR 13369) a proposed amendment to its regulations, 10 CFR Part 50, to establish a new system of specifications divided into two general categories. Only those specifications contained in the first general category that deal with accident identification, accident prevention, and accident mitigation would become part of the operating license. NUREG-102452 was issued in November 1983 to address surveillance 30 testing in technical specifications. In December 1984, the Technical Specification Improvement Project was chartered to reconsider the entire area of Technical Specifications. Presently, a cooperative effort is in effect between the industry and the NRC to implement improvement based on the Policy Statement published in the Federal Register on February 6, 1987. PSC has been appraised of the developments in the TSIP and the potential application to Fort St. Vrain. PSC intends to pursue TS simplification but any effort in this area has been conducted independent of the TSUP. PSC has not used any arguments based on TS simplification in the TSUP negotiations to resolve Licensee/Staff differences. However, PSC is expected to submit an amendment as a separate action outside the TSUP for the deletion of the fire protection technical specifications once the PSC Fire Protection Plan is approved. 2.1.5 Safety Rolated_Coolino Functions The cooling function technical specifications have been reviewed in a separate TER53 prepared by ORNL. The acceptability of the proposed upgraded Technical Specifications for the FSV cooling functions is established using a methodology that is described in detail in the ORNL TER. Previous effort by the NRC staff had emphasized establishing the acceptability of the proposed upgraded Specifications based solely on showing the consistency of the proposed revisions with the FSV FSAR and with the existing FSV Specifications while using the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (Reference 33) as general guidance especially with regard to format. However, the comprehensive review and evaluation methodology implemented by ORNL uses the STS to establish a more logical and focused framework for assessing and evaluating the completeness and adequacy of the proposed FSV Specifications. The need for focus is necessitated in part because the FSV FSAR (the licensing basis from which the TS are drawn) often lacks precision and clarity as to the functional significance of structures, systems, and components that perform cooling functions. This is because the original FSAR was written under early (1966) emerging guidelines for content. As discussed in Section 1.6.6 of Reference 6, the early guidelines portend but do not specifically reflect the level of consistency 31 currently required between TS and the supporting safety analysis report. Thus, the STS has been used as a guide first to identify generic cooliny functions and then to assess and evaluate how the FSV FSAR has addressed each function and whether the proposed FSV Specifications are consistent with the licensing basis in the FSV FSAR. As discussed in Sections 2 and 3 of the ORNL TER, the ORNL methodology is judged to be consistent with the intent and objectives reflected in the AEC's statements of considerations that accompanied the rulemaking for the regulations that governed the initial FSV licensing and the development of the existing FSV Specifications. However, as also discussed, the ORNL methodology executes the assessment using current regulatory guidelines while recognizing that the FSV license was, in most cases, formulated and approved prior to the development and implementation of the most current applicable regulations and regulatory guidelines. Key steps in the ORNL methodology are listed as follows: o Identify a set of generic cooling functions that are cited as being important-to-safety in the General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants per Appendix A, Part 50 to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (that is, 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A) . o Correlate the list of generic cooling functions with both: o the STS coverage of light water reactor SSCs that are required to effect the generic cooling functions, and o the acceptance criteria for LWR SSCs that perform such cooling functions as discussed in the LWR Standard Review Plan (SRP, Reference 54) . o Using the: correlated list of generic cooling functions that are implemented in the STS, identify the proposed FSv Specifications that address the same cooling functions. 32 o Identify the similarities and the differences between the FSV Specifications and STS functional requirements including breadth and depth of coverage. o Establish the technical and licensing basis for differences between the FSV Specifications and STS based on the FSV FSAR. o Review the FSV FSAR against both the existing and the proposed FSV TS to identify the licensing basis for unique specifications and the need for additional cooling function specifications due to unique functional requirements at FSV. o Compare and review both the existing and the proposed FSV TS to assure completeness and correctness. Results of the ORNL evaluation are summarized in Section 3 of this TER with regard to each specification that addresses a cooling function. A detailed evaluation of the cooling function specifications is provided in Section 4 of the separate ORNL TER (Reference 53) . 2.1.6 Reevaluation of Dejan Basis Accident Nn. ? (Rapid Depressurization)_ A separate TER85 has been prepared by ORNL reviewing the acceptability of helium circulator redundancy requirements to accommodate the Rapid Depressurization Accident at FSV. This section summarizes the nature of the problem addressed and conclusions reached in the ORNL TER that has been incorporated into an NRC SER80. • For a loss of normal shutdown cooling at FSV, the FSV reactor is assumed to remain pressurized with redundant trains of the seismically and environmentally qualified Safe Shutdown Cooling System available to restore forced circulation cooling. For the Safe Shutdown Cooling System, the proposed upgrade of the FSV TS requires no more than one of the two helium circulators in each of the two primary cooling loops to be OPERABLE on water turbine drive when the reactor is operating above 5% of rated thermal power or has significant levels of decay heat as determined by the magnitude 33 (>760'F) of the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature. The Economizer- Evaporator-Superheater section of each cf the two steam generators is also required to be OPERABLE under the same conditions so that two OPERABLE cooling loops exist each consisting of at least one OPERABLE helium circulator and one OPERABLE EES Section. These requirements assure minimum redundancy in the structures and components of the Safe Shutdown Cooling System that interface with the primary coolant. However, to assure adequate core cooling following a RDA, which is described in FSAR Section 14.11 as the Design Basis Accident No. 2 (or DBA-2), analysis has shown that two helium circulators operating at a speed of 8000 rpm are required to prevent fuel damage in the depressurized core following prolonged operation of the reactor at 105% of rated thermal power. If reactor-generated steam is not available to drive the helium circulators, achieving 8000 rpm on two circulators requires the use of high pressure feedwater that is provided by at least one boiler feed pump, two of which must be OPERABLE at all times per the existing and proposed upgraded Technical Specifications. The boiler feedpumps and supporting equipment such as the condenser and condensate pumps are normally operating equipment that are not part of the Safe Shutdown Cooling System. As described in FSAR Section 14.11.2.2, no fuel damage is predicted to occur as long as feedwater drive of two helium circulators can be initiated within 60 minutes of the reactor depressurization and assuming no other cooling takes place within that time. The licensee for FSV presented an analysis (Attachment No. 1 to Reference 19) to support a position that the occurrence frequency for a RDA is sufficiently low (410-9 per reactor-year) as to be incredible so that TS are not needed to require both helium circulators in each loop to be OPERABLE on water turbine drive. The ORHL TER addresses the adequacy of the Fort St. Vrain design to provide forced cooling in the event of a RDA or RDA-equivalent event. The subject TER also documents a review of the occurrence frequency for a RDA and concludes that the frequency of the event could be as high as 3 x 10-S per reactor-year instead of 10'9 per reactor-year as concluded by the licensee in Attachment No. 1 to Reference 19. This higher estimate was derived by applying to the integrity of the FSV PCRV penetration closures 34 the same rigorous logic that has been used by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards to derive PWR vessel rupture probabilities in 1974 as documented in the Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) and by the United Kingdom's Central Electricity Generating Board in reviewing the basis for judging pressurized water reactor vessel integrity in the Sizewell-8 Inquiry. Although the estimate of the occurrence frequency for the RDA was projected to be possibly much higher than predicted by the licensee, the frequency of core damage at FSV given that a ROA occurs is further estimated to be 2.5 x 10"3 per event based on analysis performed by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) under contract to ORNL and documented in Attachment 1 to the ORNL TER.85 Thus, the occurrence frequency for core damage due to a RDA or equivalent event is estimated to be about 7.5 x 10-8 per reactor-year. Since core damage due to the RDA is a low probability event but the equipment employed to accommodate the RDA is not seismically and environmentally qualified, the consequences of having to rely on Class I equipment is also addressed in the ORNL TER. As documented in FSAR Appendix 0.4, previous analyses have shown that for extended FSV operation at 35% power, there would be no significant fuel damage expected for a complete loss of forced cooling accident given the operation of redundant Class I Systems. In this case, the cooldown is due entirely to heat losses to one train of the PCRV liner cooling system (LCS), which is Class I and can be cooled by either of two diverse and redundant Class I systems (service water or firewater). Considering that the current 82% limitation on FSV operating power level would reduce the cooling needed to prevent fuel damage as compared to the 105% power FSAR case, an independent ORNL analysis was made of the potential for core damage for intermediate scenarios for equilibrium operation between 35% and 105% of rated reactor power. In the case considered in the ORML TER, only one seismically and environmentally qualified circulator with a Class 1E driver (boosted firewater) is assumed to be available for the cooldown of the depressurized reactor. This is a highly reliable system not dependent on offsite power. Thus, "relying only on a single train of the Class I equipment, it was determined that there would be very little fuel damage (about 1%) expected for the RDA occurring for <82% power scenarios. 35 Based on the ORNL TER, the redundancy requirements for the helium circulator on water turbine drive were judged to be acceptable as provided in the proposed TS for the Safe Shutdown Cooling System. The operability of both helium circulators in the same loop on water drive is not required in the upgraded TS to accommodate the potential for a RDA. The RDA was determined to be a low probability event that can be redundantly and diversely accommodated by the Safe Shutdown Cooling System with acceptable dose consequences under the current FSV power restrictions. 2. 1 .7 Electrical System Review After the NRC had reviewed and commented on the initial draft of the upgraded technical specifications, dated April 1985, and the final draft of November 1985, PSC requested a meeting with the NRC to discuss the direction the TSUP was moving in. This meeting was held on June 27, 1986.5 The comments on the upgraded technical specifications Section 3/4.8, "Auxiliary Electric Power Systems," were later withdrawn for an added review by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) . On December 18, 1986,16 a meeting was held with PSC, NRC and INEL representatives in attendance. The draft technical specifications, Section 3/4-8, were discussed during this meeting. A request for additional information was transmitted to PSC on May 6, 1987.20 PSC responded to these questions on August 24, 1987.55 Additional meetings were held on December 2, 198723 and March 15, 1988,24 which, along with additional telephone discussions, resulted in a final upgraded Technical Specifications draft, Section 3/4-8, that was submitted on March 22, 1988.31 Additional comments were provided by the licensee on June 14, 19882 and August 5, 19883. Minor editorial changes were made in Section 3/4-8 when the entire draft technical specification was submitted on May 27, 1988.1 The November 1985 draft upgraded technical specifications were compared to draft Revision 5 of the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (Reference 30). Although draft Revision 5 is not officially approved, it is the basis for the Fort St. Vrain upgrade effort. We have also reviewed, 36 without the constraint of the TSUP ground rules, the existing technical specifications through Amendment No. 58, proposed changes to the existing technical specifications (References 56 and 57) and Generic Letter 84-15 to ensure that these items have been carried over into the upgraded technical specifications. Generic Letter 84-15 requirements are also incorporated in draft Revision 5 of the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (STS) . Meetings, comments, and questions that resulted in the Reference 55 PSC response also resulted in the August 24, 1987, draft to Section 3/4.8 of the upgraded technical specifications, which was submitted as Attachment 6 of Reference 55. This draft was updated as agreed upon in telephone conversation snd meetings and was resubmitted on March 22, 1988. This review is based on the history of these submittals and on the May 27, 1988, draft upgraded Technical Specifications, Section 3/4.8 and the PSC supplemental letters of June 14, 1988 and August 5, 1988. 2.2 Generic Evaluation In evaluating the adequacy of the Licensee's proposed Technical Specifications for the TSUP, a large number of the specifications were accepted based on generic evaluations. These generic evaluations were for technical specification sections whose evaluations had a common basis. Once the generic evaluation basis was identified and accepted, then acceptance of the adequacy of TS Sections that had this common basis was simply by identification to the generic evaluation. These generic evaluations generally had an obvious basis for acceptance that had sufficient precedent so that essentially little new technical evaluation was required. The generic evaluation categories which emerged were: 1. Specification carryovers from the existing TSs 2. Specifications adapted from the STS - 3. Specifications having additional safety analysis/justification and 4. Specifications affected by conversion of interim amendments to the TSUP. 37 t Each of the generic evaluations are given below for the associated Technical Specifications evaluations given in Section 3 of this report. The generic categorization was judgemental in that in many TS sections the acceptance was based on multiple generic reasons. For example, the section was accepted because in part the section was a carryover from an existing TS section, in part because it was adapted from the STS, and in part because it required additional safety analysis. Or the acceptance was based on some other groupings of the generic reasons. The dominant generic reason was designated the group to which a particular TS section was placed for example, carryover from the existing TS. All sections that had requirements for additional safety analysis justification were also identified separately even though they may have already been categorized in another generic group. This was to highlight the fact that some aspect of the acceptance required the Licensee to provide additional justification. Also, with only a few exceptions for each TS section, comments were developed that required resolution by the Licensee. Thus, even though the technical basis for acceptance of a section may have been because of a generic evaluation, specific issues of concern were identified and commented on. Comment disposition often involved lengthy discussion and resolution with the Licensee. Although comment disposition is not repeated here, reference is given to the appropriate documentation in Table 2.2 for the comment categorization, comment documentation to the Licensee, and comment disposition document. 2.2. 1 Specification Carryovers from Existing TS The most common generic acceptance of TS Sections was that the Section existed in the current Fort St. Vrain TS and was more or less a straight forward conversion to the standard STS format. The TS Sections in this category of carryovers from the existing TSs are individually identified in the Evaluations Section 3 of this report. The technical basis for acceptance of these sections was simply that they were already in the existing license. In order to preserve the existing license (10 CFR 50.90) 38 no existing TS was allowed to be deleted or significantly changed in content without specific justification. Since the existing FSV technical specifications were often unique to the high temperature gas cooled reactor technology or had their basis in specific historical occurrences at FSV, preservation of the existing TS was a requirement. In instances where the Licensee choose to modify the existing technical specifications by a change to lesser requirements or deletion of requirements an additional safety analysis/justification was made and documented. Section 2.2.3 of this 3 report addresses all issues involving additional safety analysis/ justification. Even though TS sections accepted in this grouping of carryover from existing Fort St. Vrain TS had their basis in the existing licensing conditions, the format change to the STS always involved added wording and structuring to accommodate the equivalent to the STS mode structure and to accommodate what invariably amounted to additional STS Actions and Surveillance Requirements. Evaluation of the carryover thus generated comments that required Licensee resolution. Comments, identification, categorization, documentation and disposition are listed in Table 2.2. The tracking of comments in Table 2.2 begins with the review of the Licensee's final draft submittal for the TSUP of November 30, 1985.12 NRC Staff comments prior to the November 30, 1985, final draft were made on the first draft submittal of April 1, 1985.8 The NRC Staff provided comments on the initial draft by marking it up and provided the Licensee with the markup copy in May of 1985 and discussed the contents at the July 22-26, 1985 meeting.9 The majority of the NRC Staff markup comments were resolved at the July 1985 meeting itself. Leftover or unresolved comments were taken as action items by PSC and the NRC Staff. The NRC Staff provided resolution to their action items in their letter of October 22, 1985.11 PSC provided the resolution to their action items in Attachment 3 of their letter of November 27, 1985.12 Issues that still remained out of the earlier reviews were picked up in the review13 of the final draft of November 30, 1985 and are tracked in Table 2.2. 39 In Table 2.2 any comment categorized as: A Incorporate as is in PSC handout, B No action needed, C PSC to explain in proposed safety evaluation, E No further discussion planned, or F Further discussion possible (but not in the scope of TSUP) was dropped from further tracking and the appropriate meeting minutes became the reference for the documentation of the disposition. All other comment categories of A4 PSC action item, D PSC/NRC discussion needed to resolve, and D* NRC action item were continued to be tracked in subsequent meetings until only A, 8, C, E, and F items remained. The PSC submittal of February 20, 198719 provided an interim documentation of the disposition of most of the earlier NRC concerns. The NRC Staff then issued additional comments and requests for additional information in their letters of February 18, 1987,16 April 17, 198717 May 6, 1987,20 and July 2, 1987.21 These additional issues were discussed in the NRC/PSC meetings of August 25 and 26, 1987,22 December 2 and 3, 1987,23 and March 15 and 16, 1988.24 The PSC letter of May 27, 19881 provided the summary documentation of the disposition of all the preceding NRC concerns. The PSC safety evaluations for the C items were transmitted in the PSC letter of June 14, 19882 and are discussed further in Section 2.2.3 of this report. All of the other items during the course of subsequent meetings or teleconferences eventually became either 40 • A, B, E, or F items. All A items, although informally resolved by PSC handouts during the meetings, have their only official documentation in PSC's letter of May 27, I988.I These A items resolutions in PSC's May 27, 1988 letter were partially rechecked against the earlier PSC meeting handouts to ensure that the previously agreed to resolutions were maintained. Section 8.0, Radiological and Environmental , although carried over from the existing Technical Specifications was not upgraded per the initial agreement of guidelines for the TSUP. Thus this Section 8.0 is a verbatim carryover from the existing Technical Specifications. Section 8.0 had undergone a major revision that resulted in significant upgrades and was approved in Amendment 3758 just directly prior to the beginning of TSUP effort. Therefore, the NRC Staff agreed to exclude this section from the TSUP review. A review of each of the Sections categorized as "specification carryover from existing TS" is given in Section 3 of this report. 2.2.2 Specifications Adapted from STS Another generic acceptance of TS Sections was that the Section was primarily adapted from the STS and, therefore, was based on the precedent set in the STS. The TS Sections in this category of primarily adapted from the STS are individually identified in the Evaluations Section 3 of this report. The technical basis for acceptance of these sections was that they were parallels of and directly from the STS. As the STS identifies an acceptable technical specification for such sections, no further technical evaluation, for the basis was required. The sections in this category invariably were of a nature that they have direct application to all reactors without any need for consideration of particular unique considerations such as for high temperature gas cooled technology in the case of the Fort St. Vrain facility. 41 i Even though TS Sections accepted in this grouping of adapted directly from the STS had their basis in the STS, equivalent mode structure where applicable always required evaluation. Also, although primarily adapted from the STS, in some instances the Licensee did have already existing specifications and so there was some carryover involved. And in other instances, the Licensee deviated somewhat from a verbatim duplication of the STS. Thus NRC Staff comments were generated during the evaluation that required Licensee resolution. The tracking of comments in Table 2.2 begins with the review of the Licensee's final draft submittal for the TSUP of November 30, 1985. 12 NRC Staff comments prior to the November 30, 1985, final draft were made on the first draft submittal of April 1, 1985.8 The NRC Staff provided comments on the initial draft by marking it up and provided the Licensee with the markup copy at the July 22-26, 1985 meeting. The majority of the NRC Staff markup comments were resolved at the July 1985 meeting itself. Leftover or unresolved comments were taken as action items by PSC and the NRC Staff. The NRC Staff provided resolution to their action items in their letter of October 22, 1985. 11 PSC provided the resolution to their action items in Attachment 3 of their letter of November 27, 1985.12 Issues that still remained from those earlier reviews were picked up in the review of the final draft of November 30, 198512 and are tracked in Table 2.2. In Table 2.2 any comment categorized as: A Incorporate as is in PSC handout, B No action needed, C PSC to explain in proposed safety evaluation, E No further discussion planned, or F Further discussion possible 42 was dropped from further tracking and the appropriate meeting minutes became the reference for the documentation of the disposition. All other cu-Tent categories of: A# PSC action item, D PSC/NRC discussion needed to resolve, and • 0* NRC action item were continued to be tracked in subsequent meetings until only A, B, C. E. and F items remained. The PSC safety evaluations for the C items were transmitted in the PSC letter of June 14, 19882 and are discussed further in Section 2.2.3 of this report. All of the other items during the course of subsequent meetings or teleconferences eventually became either A, B, E. or F items. All A items, although informally resolved by PSC handouts during the meetings, have their last official documentation in PSC's letter of May 27, 1988.1 These A items resolutions in PSC's May 27, 1988 letter were partially rechecked against the earlier PSC meeting handouts to ensure that the previously agreed to resolutions were maintained. A review of each of the Sections categorized as "Specifications adapted from STS" is given below in Section 3 of this report. 2.2.3 $necifications Havina Addiyional Safety AnaivsesJJgstification Another generic acceptance of TS Sections was that the Section was accepted on the basis of PSC submittals of additional safety analysis or specific justification. The TS Sections in this category of requiring additional safety analysis or specific justification are individually identified in Section 3 of this report. In the majority of these cases the PSC position on the comment offered during the PSC/NRC meeting discussions was judged acceptable. But because the comments invariably had to do with deleting or changing license conditions in the existing technical specifications, additional safety analysis or specific justification was 43 formally required to document the change. The Licensee submitted all of these additional safety analysis and specific justifications in their letter of June 14, 1988.2 In each case the Licensee provided acceptable additional safety analyses and/or specific justifications. The technical acceptance of these comments was therefore based on evaluation of the Licensee documented justification in their June 14, 19882 letter. Each entirely deleted section evaluation and acceptance is discussed individually below. Where partial deletion or relaxation required additional safety analysis or justification, this is indicated item by item in the Evaluation Section 3 of this report. 2.2.3.1 Entire Deletion of Existing TS Section 4.9. 1. Existing Technical Specification Section 4.9.1, Fuel Loading and Initial Rise to Power was deleted in its entirety (Licensee letter of May 27, 1988). This Section addressed the initial power ascension test program. Specifically, fuel loading and low power physics testing and hot physics testing and rise to full power testing were included in this LC0. These were one time initial tests and were successfully completed in April , 1975. LCD's 4.9.1 deletion is, therefore, acceptable. 2.2.3.2 gntire Deletion of Existing TS Sertinn SR 5.4..6. Existing Technical Specification Section SR 5.4.6, Core Delta P Indicator, was deleted in its entirety (Licensee letter of May 27, 1988) . Core delta pressure indicator (PDT-1112) was used during the rise-to-power tests and fluctuation testing to measure core pressure drop. During normal operation, fluctuations in core pressure drop can be inferred from the region outlet temperature thermocouples, Specification 3/4.2.2. Core pressure drop is not used to respond to any of the accident analyses, although it is referred to in FSAR Section 7.3.3.2 as an indicator of total core pressure drop. The instrument is not part of the plant protective system, the plant's regulating control system, nor the plant's nuclear instrumentation. Core pressure drop is not a parameter specified in the PWR STS. At Fort St. Vrain primary coolant pressure, on the other hand, is a safety limit, Specification 2.2.1, and part of the plant protective system, 44 Specification 3.3. 1. There is no known requirement unique to the high temperature gas cooled technology for measurement of core pressure drop. Based on the above review, it is judged that deleting the existing technical specification SR 5.4.6 on core delta pressure indicator is acceptable. 2.2.3.3 Entire Deletion of Existing TS Section SR 5.10.5. Existing Technical Specification Section SR 5.10.5. Breathing Air System, was deleted in its entirety (Licensee Letter of May 27, 1988) . The breathable air system provides a supply of purified air to air-hose line type respirators for use in the Control Room, Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room, and the 480 V Switchgear Room. The breathable air system together with the self contained portable respirators are backups to the normal HVAC systems, (see Regulatory Guide 1.95, Protection of Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Operators Against an Accidental Chlorine Release, and Regulatory Guide 1.78, Assumptions For Evaluating the Habitability of a Nuclear Power Plant Control Room During a Postulated Hazardous Chemical Release) . Also, Standard Review Plan54 Section 6.4, Control Room Habitability System, and Section 9.4.1, Control Room Area Ventilation System as well , as the PWR STS have no requirement for a technical specification on the breathable air system. The Fort St. Vrain FSAR does take credit for the breathable air system in Section 7.4.1, Central Control Room, but only as a backup to the normal and emergency ventilation system. The Control Room emergency ventilation system is treated separately by Technical Specification Section 3/4.7.9. Based on the above review, it is judged acceptable to delete existing Technical Specification SR 5.10.5 on the breathing air system. 2.2.4 Ipecifications Affected by Conversion of Lterim Amendments to TSUP Format During the ongoing period of the Technical Specification Upgrade Program from 1985 to 1988 Amendment Nos. 47 to 6059-68,50,69,70,39 to the FSV Technical Specifications were reviewed and approved by the NRC Staff. These amendments were to the format and style of the existing Technical Specifications and as such were not reviewed at the time of the NRC approval to the format and style of the TSUP. Consequently, the Licensee in their 45 letter of May 27, 19881 converted these interim amendments to the TSUP format. A review of the format conversion to the TSUP of each of these amendments has been made based on the Licensee's May 27, 1988 letter. In each case the conversion was a straightforward format change. No technical changes were made in the TS content and no indirect interaction through either the TSUP explicit expanded Action statements or expanded Mode applicability occurred that was not already accepted during the TSUP review. That is, in the TSUP, Mode applicability statements were expanded and clarified to include Power, Low Power, Startup, Shutdown, and Refueling and frequently with an asterisk footnote to the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760'F. This Mode structure change was discussed in Section 2.1.1 of this report. As this Mode structure change was already reviewed for each TS section as part of the TSUP, it was only necessary to ensure that the change introduced by the amendment revision continued to be compatible with the new mode structure already accepted for the subject TS section. Similarly, it was only necessary to ensure the continued compatibility of the already accepted Action statements for the subject TS section. Again, the technical content of the amendments, except for mode and action considerations, was converted without change. Each amendment change is addressed below. Amendment No, : 47 Current Technical Specification: LC0 4.3.10, SR 5.3.8 TSUP Specification: LCO 3/4.7.7 Description: Allows mechanical snubbers to be replaced by hydraulic snubbers by consolidating the snubber lists into the one category of shock absorbers rather than separate lists of mechanical and hydraulic snubbers. TSUP Impact: None. Consistent with the STS the TSUP does not include lists of snubbers. Although this is a deletion from the 46 existing TS, it is acceptable as the LC0 now specifies that all safety related snubbers (Classes I and la) be operable and this defines the applicable snubbers consistent with the level of detail of the STS. Amendment No. : 48 Current Technical Specification: AC 7.7 TSUP Specification: AC 6.16 Description: Added a Fuel Surveillance Program commitment in the Technical Specifications. - TSUP Impact: Slight wording changes were made to AC 6.16, in the - November 1985 Draft. The commitment for a fuel surveillance - program is to aid in meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 50 - Appendix A, General Design Criterion 10, "Reactor Design. " Inclusion of the commitment for a fuel surveillance program in the TS is unique to FSV and is not in the STS. This commitment goes beyond the scope of the 575 and is consistent - with the Amendment No. 48 approval . - Amendment No. : 49 Current Technical Specification: LC0 4.9.3 TSUP Specification: 3/4.10.1 Description: Added Xenon Stability Testing. - TSUP Impact: Slight wording changes were made to Specification 3/4.10. 1 3$ - it appeared in the November 1985 draft. In addition, AC 6.5.2.9.d was added to denote NFSC approval authority for the engineering evaluation of expected power perturbations during the test. - 47 I J Amendment Nos. : 50. 52. and 5Q For amendment Nos. 50, Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System, 52, Circulator Speed-High Steam circulator trip, and 58, Surveillance and Calibration Requirements of the Plant Protective System, the affected TS Sections 4.4.1 and 5.4.1 were not reviewed as part of the TSUP. TS Section 4.4.1, Protection System Instrumentation, however, is part of the review being done on the Plant Protective System Setpoints. see Section 1.6.1 of this report. Sections 4.4.1 and 5.4.1 were converted to the TSUP and were found acceptable. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.8 TSUP Specification: SR 4.5.2.1 Description: a. Operate Normal Bearing Water Makeup Pump in recycle mode once per 92 days. b. Perform functional tests of Emergency Bearing Water Makeup Pump every 92 days. c. Perform functional tests of Bearing Water Pumps and controls at each shutdown, and calibrate instruments annually. TSUP Impact: The amendment is reflected in Specifications SR 4.5.2.1.a and SR 4.5.2.1.c. The instrumentation calibrations have not been included since, consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE, the operability of attendant instrumentation is to be ensured via an administratively controlled calibration program. 48 u i J Amendment No. : SI Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.9 TSUP Specification: SR 4.5.2.1 Description: Perform functional tests of bearing water accumulators and controls every 92 days, and calibrate annually. TSUP Impact: The amendment is reflected in Specification SR 4.5.2.1.a.1 except that, consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE. the operability of attendant instrumentation and controls is to be ensured via an administratively controlled calibration program. Amendment No : SL Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.10 TSUP Specification: SR 4.5.5.1 Description: Verify each fire pump develops at least 1425 gpm at a discharge pressure no less than 119 psig. TSUP Impact: The amendment is reflected in Specification SR 4.5.5.1.d.2. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.16 TSUP Specification: SR 4.6.4.3 Description: Perform leak tests of helium purification cooler well closures once per Refueling cycle, and test/calibrate associated instrumentation. 49 f TSUP Impact: The amendment, including leak detection instrumentation, is reflected in Specification SR 4.6.4.3.d. Amendment No, : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.21 TSUP Specifications: SR 4.5.5, SR 4.6.2.1, SR 4.8.4 Description: Perform testing of valves and transfer switches that must be manually positioned for actuation of the ACM mode of operation. TSUP Impact: ACM loads are addressed in Specification SR 4.8.4.e.2, and this surveillance will test the manual transfer switches but at a reduced frequency consistent with ACM operability testing. The testing of ACM valves will be addressed in the administrative controls for Safe Shutdown Cooling Valves (of which the ACM valves are a subset) that will be implemented under Specifications SR 4.5.5 and SR 4.6.2.1 as appropriate. PSC maintains a list of the Safe Shutdown Cooling Valves correlated with the surveillances for those valves that are under administrative controls. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.b TSUP Specification: SR 4.5.5 Description: Perform monthly functional tests of circulating water makeup pumps and controls, annual performance/mechanical condition test, and annual calibration of instruments. 50 A TSUP Impact: The monthly test is included in Specification SR 4.5.5.1 .b.2. except that instruments and controls are addressed via administrative controls consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE. The annual performance test and condition monitoring are included in Specification SR 4.S.5.1 .c.2. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.d TSUP Specification: SR 4.5.5 Description: Verify alignment and settlement of the circulating water makeup pond embankments once per 5 years. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specification SR 4.5.5.1.e. Amendment No. : 51. Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.e TSUP Specification: SR 4.7.4 Description: Perform monthly functional tests on each service water pump and associated controls. Verify performance/mechanical condition annually and calibrate instruments. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specifications SR 4.7.4.1.b.2 and SR 4.7.4.1.c. Instrumentation is to be addressed via administrative controls consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE. 51 Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.f TSUP Specification: SR 4.6.2.1 Description: Perform monthly functional tests on each reactor plant cooling water pump and controls. Annually verify performance and mechanical condition and calibrate instruments. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specifications SR 4.6.2.1.b.2 and SR 4.6.2.1.c. Instrumentation and controls are to be addressed via administrative controls consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.g TSUP Specification: SR 4.7.5 Description: Perform monthly functional tests of each purification cooling water pump and controls. Annually verify performance and calibrate instrumentation. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specifications SR 4.7.5.b and SR 4.7.S.c except that the operability of instrumentation and controls is to be ensured via administrative controls consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE. Amendment No. : 51 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.2.24.h TSUP Specification: LCO/SR 3/4.6.4.3 52 4 Description: Perform testing of valves that are used for automatic isolation of purification cooling water system and reactor plant cooling water system to assure confinement integrity of PCRV interfacing structures (cooling tubes) . TSUP Impact: This amendment, which has been expanded to include a limiting condition for operation on PCRV integrity in terms of assuring confinement integrity afforded in interfacing structures, is reflected in Specifications IC0 3.6.4.3.b, SR 4.6.4.3.b, and SR 4.6.4.3.c. Amendment No, : St Current Technical Specification: SR 5.3.4 TSUP Specifications: SR 4.5.1, SR 4.5.2, SR 4.5.3, SR 4.5.4, SR 4.5.5, SR 4.7.8 Description: Test Safe Shutdown Cooling Valves. TSUP Impact: Consistent with the STS treatment of manual valves, the operability of manually actuated valves will be demonstrated via administrative controls for the associated flow paths. PSC maintains a correlation of the manual valves with the implementing surveillance. Safe Shutdown Cooling Valves actuated automatically by SLRD1S will be demonstrated operable via SR 4.7.8. Amendment No. : 5t Current Technical Specification: SR 5.4.5 TSUP Specification: SR 4.6.2.1 Description: Perform functional check of the PCRV cooling system flow scanner, alarms, and flowmeters. 53 TSUP Impact: None. The provisions of SR 4,6,2.1 have been accepted as demonstrating an adequate basis for assuring PCRV liner cooling tube flow without reliance on the flow scanner. Amendment No. : 5Z See discussion under Amendment No. 50. - Amendment No. : 5} Current Technical Specification: LC0 4.10.7 TSUP Specification: 3/4.7.6.4 Description: Corrected the elevation of Hose Station TH12-G4 from Access Bay Building elevation 4885 to 4904 to accurately reflect the _ actual configuration of the plant. TSUP Impact: Included in Specification 3/4.7.6.4 in Table 3.7.6-1 . - Amendment No. : 54 Current Technical Specification: SR 5.6.1e) - TSUP Specification: 4.8.1.1.2e.5 Description: Tests simulate loss of offsite power, load-sledding, startup of the standby diesel generators, and operation of the load sequences. TSUP Impact: None, consistent with the STS, this test is performed on a refueling basis. The test as implemented in the TSUP utilizes wording similar to the STS wording. - 54 _ • Amendment No. : 55 Current Technical Specification: LCO 4.3.1 TSUP Specification: LCO/SR 3/4.5.3 Description: Deleted the reheater section of each steam generator from Safe Shutdown Cooling Equipment. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specification LCO/SR 3/4.5.3. Amendment No. : 56 Current Technical Specifications: AC 7.1.1.3, 7.1.2.1, 7.1 .2.5, 7.1.3, Figures 7.1-1, and 7.1-2, and AC 7.4.b. TSUP Specifications: Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2, ACs 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.4.3, 6.5.1.2, 6.5.1.6, 6.5.2.1, 6.5.2.2, 6.5.2.4, 6.5.2.9, 6.5.2.11, 6.5.2.12, 6.8.2. Description: Reflected current PSC organization and administration substituting the title changes of Superintendent of Training for Training Supervisor, Support Service Manager for Radiation Protection Manager, Superintendent of Technical Services Engineering for Technical Services Engineering Supervisor, deletion of reference to the Fort St. Vrain Security Committee, added the Manager of Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division to the NFSC membership, changed the chairman of the NFSC to an appointed position, added control rod withdrawal , base reactivity and unreviewed environmental questions for NFSC approval, and changed to Vice President. Nuclear Operations from Vice President, Electric Production in the NFSC. 55 TSUP Impact: Reflected in the identified TSUP AC Sections. (Note that Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 were subsequently deleted by the Licensee in their Kay 27, 1988 submittal per Generic Letter 88-06.) Amendment No. : 57 Current Technical Specifications: LCO 4.0.4, LCO 4.1.9, SR 5.1 .8 TSUP Specifications: LCO 3.0,5, LCO/SR 3/4.2.4 Description: Revised minimum helium flow requirements as a function of the new concept of Calculated Bulk Core Temperature. TSUP Impact: This amendment is reflected in Specifications LCO 3.0.5 and LCO/SR 3/4.2.4 but is also expanded to use the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature to demarcate the transition in redundancy requirements for safety-related and important-to-safety equipment. Amendment No: 58 See discussion under Amendment No. 50. Amendment No: 5@ Current Technical Specification: LCO 4.3.10, SR 5.3.8 TSUP Specification: 3/4.7.10. Description: Deleted the lists of snubbers in Tables 4.3.10-1 and 4.3.10-2 and references to these tables. TSUP Impact: TSUP 3/4.7.10 has these lists of snubbers deleted. 56 Amendment No: 60 Current Technical Specification: SL 3.3, LCO 4.4. 1, and SR 5.4. 1 TSUP Specification: 2.2.1, LCO 3/4.3.1. Description: Accounted for instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpoint and the allowable value per the methodology of the Instrument Society of America Standard $67.04-1982. TSUP Impact: The review of this amendment change was outside the scope of the TSUP and was the subject of a separate INEL TER.38 The conversion of the approved Amendment No. 6039 to the TSUP format was straightforward and involved minor changes to the existing wording. 2.3 Plant Specific Technical Specifications Evaluation Methodology Many TS sections for the fort St. Vrain nuclear station, because they are peculiar to or significantly interface with the unique technology associated with high temperature gas cooled reactors and or because of major differences from the existing TS and/or from the STS, required specific evaluation. The TS sections which required specific evaluation are individually identified in the Evaluation Section 3 of this report. TS sections in this category generally required specific evaluation because: i) The specifications were on systems or equipment that have no direct counterpart in either the PWR or BWR STS and because in the conversion to the STS, significant changes were made from the existing TSs. Specifications in this category generally were on systems and equipment unique to Fort St. Vrain such as safety related cooling functions (helium circulators, steam generators, and PCRV Liner cooling system), helium circulator auxiliaries, emergency feedwater and condensate headers, etc. Ii 57 ii) The specifications, that although in the existing TS, underwent significant change to make them compatible with safety related cooling functions and their support systems. Specifications in this category significantly interact with and or are integral to the overall implementation of the safety related cooling functions group such as the boiler feed pumps, condensate pumps, firewater pumps, circulating water pumps, emergency feedwater booster pumps, etc. iii) The specifications, that although in the existing TS, underwent significant change in the conversion to the upgrade structure and format or were entirely new. Specifications in this category were for the steam water dump system, steam generator interspace radiation monitoring, safety limits, control rod and reactivity status, core temperature and flow limits, electrical power systems, etc. For each of the TS sections in the category of requiring specific evaluation, the technical basis for acceptance had to be extensively developed and involved considerable evaluation with the Licensee of the interpretation and intent of the guidelines for the overall TSUP. These specifications also involved significant interaction and supplementation from one to the other, dealt with complex issues unique to Fort St. Vrain such as the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760'F and Fort St. Vrain mode structure. These issues were very central to nuclear safety at Fort St. Vrain. For these reasons, each of these specifications and their technical acceptance is discussed extensively in the individual evaluation sections in Section 3 of this report. 58 3.0 EVALUATIONS The FSV Technical Specification section by section evaluation is presented in this section. For convenience, the sequence is exactly that of the FSV Technical Specifications. After each section title is an identifier in parenthesis to give the generic or plant specific categorization from Section 2 of this report. Except for the plant specific specifications and those specifications having additional safety analysis/justification, the technical acceptance has been based on the precedent of the existing technical specifications or of the Standard Technical Specifications (see Section 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of this report) . For plant specific specifications and specifications having additional safety analysis/justification, the technical acceptance is as stated in the individual section evaluation below. INTRODUCTION Table of Contents. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Table of Contents was upgraded to generally follow the STS format. However, in minor respects the upgrade did not follow in detail the STS format. 1 .0 DFFTNTT[Q , (Specification carryover from existing TS) Many STS definitions were added to augment the existing FSV definitions, which themselves were clarified. These changes brought the definition section much more into agreement with the STS. Several definition issues were resolved as follows. 3 .5 CAICUTATED RUIK CORE TEMPERATURE (Specification carryover from existing TS) 59 A new definition for Calculated Bulk Core Temperature was added and is unique to FSV. As explained in Section 2.1.2 of this report, the 760" Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is the FSV parallel for the STS demarcation for redundancy requirements and for when certain action statements are invoked. 1 .11 CORE ALTERATION (Specification carryover from existing TS) Excluding movement of control rod pairs from the definition was revised to limit the type of excluded movement to only insertion of control rod pairs or reserve shutdown material . Thus addition of reactivity due to control rod pair withdrawal was added back within the meaning of core alteration as it should be. 1 , 16 F-BAR - AVFRAGF DISINTEGRATION ENFRGY (Specification carryover from existing TS) FSV's definition was only inclusive of noble gas radionuclides. However, this was consistent with the use of E-BAR in TSUP Section 3/4.4.1 on primary coolant specific activity and FSAR Section 14.8. E-BAR in the STS is tied to a 100/E limit on PCS specific beta plus gamma activity excluding iodines and for half lives greater than 15 minutes. This is to limit the site boundary 2 hour dose to much less than 10 CFR 100 limits in the event of a steam generator tube rupture with a 1 GPM PCS to SCS leak. E-BAR in FSV is tied to a 2.4/E limit on PCS specific NG beta plus gamma activity at 15 minutes after sampling. At FSV, this is to limit the offsite dose from the maximum credible accident discussed in FSAR Section 14.8. FSV is generally not susceptible to a PCS to SCS leak because SCS pressure is greater than PCS pressure except in the reheater section. TABLE 1.1 OPERATION MODES (Specification carryover from existing TS) Table 1.1 was added to more clearly define modes similarly to the STS. The upgrade to Modes more comparable to the STS was discussed 60 extensively in Section 2.1 .1 of this report. PSC's original proposed "#" and "@" footnotes to Table 1.1 were revised so as to limit the exceptions introduced by these footnotes. The "#" footnote exception now is limited to only the "Off" position of the Reactor Mode Switch when in the Shutdown mode with the proviso that control rods are verified to remain fully inserted (or as required by Refueling operation or surveillance testing). The "@" footnote exception now is limited to only the Low Power mode and allows the Interlock Sequence Switch only to be changed to the Power position. As changing the ISS • position from Low Power to Power only adds more protective functions, it is now an acceptable exception for performing surveillance testing and other tests. OPERpXU1QQ (Specification carryover from existing TS) The definition for operating was deleted as it incorrectly implied that the system was OPERABLE. Although a system is operating it may not be operable, for example, because its backup emergency power source may not be operable. SAFE SHUTDOWN COALING (Specification carryover from existing TS) SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING was revised to clarify the use of forced circulation cooling via the steam generators and helium circulator water turbine drives with firewater. QIPMENT SURVEILLANCE TEST NORMA! OPERATING RANGE RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REACTOR SHUTDOWN REFQL ING SHUTDOWN 61 These definitions in the existing FSV TS were deleted because they - either had no comparable in the 5TS or because they were absorbed in the new Table 1. 1 for Operation Modes. 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTING� . 1 Safety Limit 2.1 .1 Reactor Core Safety Limit (Specification carryover from existing TS) Although SL 2.1.1 is a carryover from existing Specification 3.1, the formulation of the safety limit has been modified (1) to be consistent with the manner in which the margin to the safety limit is tracked by plant personnel and (2) to place the required operator responses to transient-induced core power-to-flow imbalances in an LCO rather than in the safety limit specification. The latter modification is consistent with the format and structure of the STS and enhances the clarity of the safety limit itself as compared to the existing Specification that does not adequately distinguish the safety limit on the integral effects of single or multiple transients from the required operator response to deviations in observed plant parameters during a specific transient. The new separate - Specification, LCO/SR 3/4.2.6, combines the implied limiting condition for operation that was included in existing Si 3.1 and the surveillance requirements for establishing the safety limit margin as given in existing Specification SR 5.1.6. The thrust of the safety limit is to assure that fuel particles in each segment of fuel do not experience in a single transient or in multiple . _ transients a limiting combination of high temperatures and prolonged positive thermal gradients (heat fluxes) that can be induced by core power-to-flow imbalances. If the core power-to-flow imbalance is large and lasts for too long a period of time, fuel element heat fluxes may be of sufficient magnitude and of sufficient integral time duration to cause the _ fuel kernel inside the fuel particle coating to migrate along the direction of the thermal gradient and through both the inner carbon buffer coating and the inner pyrolytic carbon shell surrounding the fuel kernel . Migration of 62 I II L r the kernel through the first two coating layers of the particle would allow the kernel to chemically attack in succession the silicon carbide coating and the outer pyrolytic carbon coating and ultimately to fail the fuel particle coatings leading to fission product release. Since the effects of separate instances of kernel migration are cumulative, multiple migration-inducing transients of different power-to-flow ratios and of - different time duration can lead to violation of the safety limit. The analysis (FSAR Sections 3.6.7.6 and 3.6.8) supporting the safety limit and the LCO/SR has two principal results: namely, (1) the determination of the power level and power-to-flow ratio envelope (Figure 3.2.6-1) in which no kernel migration occurs even for indefinite periods of operation and (2) the determination of the time limits (Figure 3.2.6-2) for extended operation as a function of the power-to-flow ratios that induce kernel migration up to the point of penetrating the first two particle coating layers in a nominally manufactured fuel particle. These determinations have been made with conservative/bounding assumptions about steady state core conditions, such as in-core power peaking and temperatures, and about the kernel migration rate as inferred from experimental data at the 95% confidence level . The mechanism for establishing compliance with the safety limit is that the sum of the ratios of the time interval that each fuel segment experiences an operating condition that can induce kernel migration divided by the time it would take to violate the safety limit under that operating condition must be less than 1 for that fuel segment. The integral fraction of time is used since the time limit varies as a function of the power-to-flow ratio, which can differ with each transient. The ACTION for LCO 3.2.6 prescribes (1) the mechanism for identifying a potential migration-inducing transient, (2) the technique for calculating the ratio of the time in the transient divided by the time it would take the kernel to penetrate both inner particle coating layers during the transient, and (3) the requirement for summing the fractions from the current and previous transients to compare to the safety limit integral fraction of unity. By using this technique, the integral effect of all migration-inducing 63 r power-to-flow transients on the fuel particles in any segment of fuel is assured not to exceed that effect, which, using bounding assumptions on core conditions, can cause the kernel in the average particles to penetrate both the inner buffer layer and inner pyrolytic carbon layer of the particle coatings. If a violation of the safety limit occurs, the reactor must be shut down within 24 hours, and the event reported to NRC which will determine if restart is allowed. The upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. p. 1 .2 Reactor Vessel Pressurg (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification has not been modified significantly in the carryover except for restructuring to reflect the STS format. The basis statement has been rewritten to reflect the FSAR design bases for the PCRV and the PCRV penetrations, and a footnote has been added to the basis statement citing the more stringent pressure limits per Specification LCO 3.9. 1 when the primary coolant boundary includes that of the PCRV-mounted fuel handling machines being used during in-core fuel handling and refueling. The specification is judged to be acceptable. ?.2 Limiting Safety System Setting% 2.2 J Setpoints. (Outside the scope of the TSUP) The Limiting Safety System Settings trip setpoints section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specification Section 3.3 but was significantly improved to account for instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpoint and the allowable value. As indicated in Section 1.6.1 of this report, the LSSS review was outside the scope of the TSUP. The technical justification for acceptance of the Licensee's accounting for instrumentation accuracy in the LSSS section is, therefore, not the subject of this report, but may be found in the references of the summary discussion of Section 1.6.1 of this report. The trip setpoints were changed and allowable values were established to account for instrumentation inaccuracy per the methodology of the Instrument Society of America Standard $67.04-1982, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-related Instrumentation Used in Nuclear Power Plants." 64 For the interim the approved Amendment No. 6039 for the LSSS Section, Licensee's amendment application letter of February 8, 1988, was converted to the upgrade format and was found acceptable. The fuel particle integrity safety limit of Specification 2.1.1, on time at various - power-to-flow ratios is protected by the limiting safety system settings on - high neutron flux, high reheat steam temperature, and low primary coolant pressure. The PCRV barrier safety limit of specification 2.1.2 is protected by the limiting safety system settings on primary coolant high pressure, primary coolant high moisture, and PCRV and circulator and steam generator penetration interspace rupture discs and safety valves settings. The FSV - scram trips on startup high count rate, low main steam pressure, plant electrical system loss, two loop trouble, and high reactor building temperature have not been designated as limiting safety system settings. This is counter to the STS LSSSs wherein all reactor trip function setpoints are judged necessary to protect the core safety limits so that they are all - designated as limiting safety system settings. At FSV, the scram trips on startup high count rate, low main steam pressure, plant electrical system loss, two loop trouble, and high reactor building temperature have been stated by the Licensee in the FSAR to not directly protect the safety limits on fuel particle integrity or PCRV barriers but are anticipatory to getting the reactor trips which directly protect the fuel and PCRV barriers. The reheat steam temperature high provides a scram trip sensitive to helium flow _ as the helium flows past the reheater section of the steam generator before it flows past the evaporator-economizer-superheater section. Reactor primary coolant system barriers are protected by PCRV, helium circulator penetration interspace and steam generator penetration interspace rupture _ discs and safety valves limiting safety system settings. The trip setpoints (disc burst pressure and safety valve open setpoint) for these LSSSs have a — plus and minus tolerance rather than the typical S7S one-sided trip setpoint tolerance. The allowable values, however, have one-sided tolerances to reflect protection of the pressure upper safety limit of 845 psig, Specification 2.1.2, for the reactor primary coolant barriers. The low side - tolerance on the trip setpoints protects the assumption in the safety analysis that for a certain class of potential transients that result in primary coolant system pressure increases that the rupture discs and safety 65 — valves setpoint are not reached. That is, since the rupture discs and/or safety valves do not burst and/or open, radioactive gases are not released from the PCRV for these transients. FSV has made the rupture disc and safety valve burst pressures and setpoints limiting safety system setpoints as well as the primary coolant high pressure scram. While the STS recognizes primary coolant high pressure as a safety limit, STS Section 2. 1 .2, as does FSV, the STS recognizes primary coolant system pressurizer safety valve setpoints only as limiting conditions for operations, STS Sections 3.4.2.2, and not as limiting safety system settings. Thus with regard to the rupture discs and safety valve burst pressure and setpoints. FSV has exceeded the STS requirements by recognizing these as limiting safety system settings. The information provided by the Licensee in Section 2.2. 1 of the TSUP is consistent with FSAR Chapters 7.0, Instrumentation and Control , and I4, Safety Analysis. The information provided is analogous to that of STS Section 2.2.1 except that the functions with LSSSs are mostly unique to FSV. There are several areas of continuing resolution for the PPS trip setpoints that will be treated outside the scope of the TSUP. These other areas are identified in the INEL TER38 on the PPS. Also, there are no specifications on the error allowances "TA, S, and Z" as in the STS. Analogous error data for FSV may be found in the Licensee's June 21, 1985 submitta1 .71 However, this was judged outside the scope of the TSUP and of the Licensee's accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy but may be addressed in a future separate licensing action. As the LSSS applicability and actions for inoperable instruments are referenced to Specification 3.3.1, further discussion of these topics is in Section 3.3.1 of the Evaluation Section 3 of this report. LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.0/4.0 Applicability. (Specification adapted from STS) The Applicability section was adapted directly from the STS. The existing TS Section 4.0/5.0 information was deleted as it was no longer necessary. In 66 addition to adapting the STS Applicability, the Licensee adopted most of the recommendations in Enclosures 2 and 3 of Generic Letter 87-09.72 There are some FSV site specific justified differences from the STS and Generic Letter 87-09. In the STS LCO 3.03, when a Limiting Condition for Operation is not met, the unit is to be placed in at least Hot Standby within 6 hours, in Hot Shutdown within the subsequent 24 hours. FSV specifies the unit to be placed in Low Power in 12 hours and in Shutdown within the following 12 hours. Hot Standby (Tavg >350'F), Hot Shutdown (350'F>Tavg >200'F) and Cold Shutdown (Tavg≤200'F) are replaced at FSV by just the Shutdown mode as discussed in Section 2.1.1 as the PWR Primary Coolant water temperature of 350'F and 200°F have no meaningful parallels in a helium gas cooled reactor. The 24 hours to Shutdown at FSV rather than the 6 hours in the STS is acceptable for two major reasons. First, because 24 hours is in the existing TS Section 4.0 to below for an orderly shutdown and thus was accepted in the existing license basis. The 12 hours to be in Low Power (30% rated thermal power) is allowed to minimize unnecessary transients on the steam generator turbine that would result from going through boilout during sudden reductions to lower power. The next 12 hours to get to Shutdown is to allow for core orifice adjustment from an equal temperature configuration (FSAR Section 3.6.7) to an equal flow configuration. Second, time to Shutdown at FSV is not as critical as at PWRs. FSAR Section 14.4.4.2 shows that a total interruption of coolant flow from 105% power for thirty minute will not result in any significant fuel damage. Also, FSAR Section 14.4.2.2 shows that a 1-1/2 hour delay without cooling can be tolerated from 87.5% power without significant fuel damage. For a permanent loss of forced circulation cooling, Design Basis Accident No. 1, FSAR Section 14.10, maximum fuel temperature is reached after 83 hours and although there is extensive fuel damage, very little fission products escape offsite because the PCRV is not breached. The 6 month offsite thyroid dose at the low population zone is 36.0 mrem. For the rapid depressurization accident, Design Basis Accident No. 2, FSAR Section 14.11. the 6 month offsite thyroid dose at the low population zone is 1.1 rem, conservatively, not accounting for helium buoyancy during the transport offsite. These low releases for the FSV gas cooled reactor are because of the large heat sink provided by the core and reflector graphite and because 67 of the high integrity of the refractory fuel at high temperatures. Thus allowing FSV a longer time to reach Shutdown after equipment inoperability. recognizes the much longer times to reach fuel damage, the PCRV integrity, and the relatively smaller offsite dose consequences. Although, the FSV longer time of 24 hours to be in shutdown versus the STS time of 6 hours for PWRs is not quantitatively derived from rigorous relative probabilistic risk comparisons, the above discussion of longer times before fuel failure for FSV is supportive of a longer time to be in shutdown. And, the 24 hours to be in shutdown is not excessive relative to the time required for an orderly shutdown based on avoiding boilout in the steam generator tubes and based on the time required for re-orificing. LCO 3.0.5 on how to determine the time to reach the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760°F is specific to FSV. Except for minor changes in the TSUP, LCO 3.0.5 was approved in Amendment No. 57 as existing LCO 4.0.4. The CBCT was specified in this amendment as a demarcation for applicability to the Shutdown mode of minimum helium circulator flow or helium coolant temperature rise for core regions in existing LCO 4. 1.9. In this TSUP, the CBCT is not only used for TSUP LCO 3.2.4 (existing TS LCO 4. 1 .9) but also throughout the entire LCO sections for demarcation of LCO Applicability and Action statements. For more information on the CBCT, see Sections 2.1. 1 and 2.1.2 of this. For more information on Amendment No. 57 on existing LCO 4.1.9, see Sections 1.6.3 and 2.2.4 of this report. The concept and use of the CBCT in the TSUP is accepted elsewhere in this report as just noted. LCO 3.0.5 is just a convenient central location for the discussion of the calculation and the information needed to do the calculation in Figures 3.0-1, decay heat curve, and 3.0-2, energy required to reach 760°F. Thus LCO 3.0.5 is acceptable as a conservative method to calculate the time to reach a CBCT of 760°F assuming interruption of all forced primary coolant circulation. 3/4.1 Reactivity Control Systems (Section carryover from existing interim TS except for upgraded Specification 3/4.1.7.) The partial failure-to-scram event73 of June 23, 1984, and the subsequent NRC audit report of October 16, 1984,7 led to the development and implementation of 68 an interim set of technical specifications for the FSV reactivity control system.74-77,81 These Interim Specifications have been in effect since the summer of 1985, and one interim specification on reactivity change with temperature has also been revised on an interim basis.78 Because the FSV reactivity control system more closely resembles that of a boiling water reactor as opposed to that of the pressurized water reactor, the provisions of the interim and upgraded FSV specifications often more closely resemble those of the General Electric BWR-STS (Reference 79) as opposed to the Westinghouse STS (Reference 33) . Some of these parallels are addressed in the following evaluations. 3/4. 1 . 1 Control Rod Pair Operability (Specification carryover from existing Interim TS) This specification is a revised and upgraded carryover of the Interim Specification 3/4.1.1. The operability requirements for control rod pairs have been further clarified with respect to the Interim TS to specify that (1) the 152 second scram time for demonstrating operability is from the fully withdrawn position, (2) the helium purge flow shall not be carrying condensed water, and (3) there shall be an absence of a slack cable alarm. The ACTION statements for the Interim TS have been clarified as follows: (1) to require a SHUTDOWN MARGIN assessment whenever a shutdown is effected due to identifying immovable control rod pairs, (2) to allow continued operation with the temperatures of up to four control rod motors exceeding 250'F as long as periodic (24-hour) surveillances (partial scram tests) are performed to establish an acceptable scram time for operability, (3) to specify appropriate action in response to finding significant amounts of condensed moisture in the knock-out pot on the clean helium purge line to the control rod drives, and (4) to specify the maximum operator response times allowed for diagnosing the cause of a slack cable alarm (FSAR Sections 3.2.2.6, 3.8.1.1.1, and 3.8.2). - In addition to surveillance modifications that reflect changes made to the Interim TS ICO, the surveillances have also been modified slightly from the Interim TS to account for operating experience. Due to 69 II mechanical limitations, partial scram tests for fully inserted rod pairs can only be used to demonstrate that the rod pair is capable of being scrammed but not for showing an acceptable scram time. Once a rod pair is withdrawn from the fully inserted position, the operability requirement on scram time is to be demonstrated within 7 days per the SR. In Attachment 1 to Reference 80, the licensee has presented the rationale for not specifying a minimum purge flow for the surveillance at this time. The licensee indicates that assuring a positive value of net purge flow is sufficient at this time and that purge flow requirements will be included in the future resolution of outstanding commitments to NRC of integrated control rod drive operability issues. These issues include planned temperature requalifications of the control rod drive mechanism that will directly impact the magnitude of required purge flow. The control rod operability specification is judged to be acceptable at this time. 3/4.1 .2 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems 3/4-1 .Z,1 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems-Operating (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is a reformatted version of Interim Specification LCO/SR 3/4. 1.2 that has been revised to quantify the number of redundant and/or diverse indication mechanisms that are required to be operable at different control rod positions (FSAR Sections 3.8.1.1 and 7.2.2) . Both the system requirements in the condition statement and the ACTIONs as given in the _ Interim TS have been reformatted into Specification Table 3.1.2-1 of the upgrade. The table provides the quantification of the required operable indication mechanisms. The surveillance has been reformatted slightly from the Interim TS with the rationale for certain surveillance actions to prevent potentiometer damage moved to the basis summary statements. The upgraded specification is judged to have an improved clarity in comparison to the Interim TS and to be acceptable. 70 V4.1 .2.2 Control Rod Pair Position Indication Systems-Shutdown (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is a reformatted and revised version of Interim Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.3. The revision quantifies the required operable rod position indication mechanisms for SHUTDOWN and REFUELING. The surveillance has been reformatted similar to that of the upgraded LCO/SR 3/4.1.2.1 discussed previously. The upgraded specification is judged to have an improved clarity in comparison to the Interim TS and to be acceptable. Z/4. 1 .3 Shutdown Marais (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is a slight revision and reformatting of Interim Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.4. The most significant revision is that, in the upgraded TS, the surveillance and the basis summary statement refer to the "assessment" of SHUTDOWN MARGIN as opposed to "verification" as used in the Interim TS. This change properly reflects the fact that, to comply with the surveillance, the operator must obtain the results of calculational analyses made off site and has no control over the verification process for these analyses (FSAR Sections 3.5.3.1 and 3.5.7.4 and Table 3.5-6, although the assessment methodology is not described in the FSAR) . During SHUTDOWN and REFUELING, the operator is required to verify subcriticality from the startup detector count rates when control rod pairs are withdrawn to a position that is calculated to be worth .01 delta-k of rod withdrawal . The ACTION statements in both the interim and upgraded versions of this TS are formatted after the example given by Specification 3/4.1.1 in . the BWR-STS, but the surveillance for SHUTDOWN MARGIN determination more r closely follows the example in SR 4.1.1.1 and SR 4.1.1.2 in the STS. The assessment methodology for SHUTDOWN MARGIN is understood to be related to the methodology used for determining the base reactivity curve as applied in upgraded Specification LCO 3.1.7, Reactivity Status, which is discussed below. Further, the assessment methodology is understood to be related to that used for SHUTDOWN MARGIN analysis in the fuel segment reload design per Specification Design Feature (OF) 5.3.4. The reload segment 71 f design methodology is also used to establish the control rod pair withdrawal sequence per Specification OF 5.3.4. Both the base reactivity curve used in Specification LCO 3.1.7 and the control rod pair withdrawal sequence are approved by the FSV Nuclear Facility Safety Committee per Specification AC 6.5.2.9.a. The reload segment design, including associated SHUTDOWN MARGIN, is a safety significant change to the reactor core system that is subject to NFSC review per Specification AC 6.5.2.8.a and record keeping per 10 CFR Part 50.59(b)(3) . Compliance with the "assessed" SHUTDOWN MARGIN as a TS limit is subject to NFSC audit per Specification AC 6.5.2.10.a as are associated quality assurance activities per Specification AC 6.5.2.10.d. Thus, the upgraded Specifications are judged to place the responsibility for - tracking and assuring the validity of the SHUTDOWN MARGIN assessments made per Specification SR 4.1.3 directly under the cognizance of the NFSC. The upgraded TS is judged to be explicit and thereby a significant improvement over the indirect coverage of SHUTDOWN MARGIN as implied in the existing former LCO 4.1.2 and existing LCO 4.1.8 and SR 5.1.4. The NFSC is judged to be directly responsible for the quality assurance of the SHUTDOWN MARGIN assessment. The TS is judged to be acceptable. 3/4. 1 .4 Control Rod Worth and Position Requirements - 3/4.1 .4.1 Control Rod Worth and Position Reouirements-Oneratino (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is essentially a reformatting of Interim Specification _ LCO/SR 3/4. 1.5 and, with regard to control rod position requirements, is equivalent in intent to STS LCO/SR 3.1.3.6, Control Rod Insertion Limits.At FSV, unlike the Westinghouse PWR in which the rod bank withdrawal sequence remains unchanged from cycle to cycle, the control rod pair withdrawal sequence is specified uniquely as part of the nuclear design for each fuel cycle and is hard-wired into the control circuitry before startup of each fuel cycle (FSAR Sections 3.5.3.1 and 3.5.3.4 and Tables 3.5-6 through 3.5-8). Thus, there is no need for similar specifications as those for operability of the BWR rod sequence control system per BWR-STS LCO 3.1.4.2 since FSV cannot operate in STARTUP or at higher power levels 72 I q without the equivalent system being both operable and operating. Also, because of the predetermination of the control rod pair withdrawal sequence and because the position limits imposed by FSV upgraded Specification LCO 3. 1.4.1, there is no need for a rod worth minimizer as used at BWRs and as subjected to operability requirements per BWR-STS LC0/SR 3.1.4.1. As discussed in the basis summary statements for FSV upgraded Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.4.1, the control rod pair withdrawal sequence is determined in accordance with Specification OF 5.3.4, Reload Segment Design, and this determination is reviewed and approved by the FSV NFSC per Specifications AC 6.5.2.8.a and AC 6.5.2.9.a prior to startup of the core reload. The control rod pair position limits of upgraded LCO 3/4. 1 .4. 1 are factored into the reload design to establish by analysis that power peaking, the temperature coefficient of reactivity and maximum control rod pair worth are acceptable and within the bounds of assumptions in the safety analysis. As indicated, the NFSC has cognizance over reload segment design review. During startup, Specification SR 4.1.4.1.2 is performed to measure control rod pair group worths to verify that the calculated results are valid for assuring the maximum calculated control rod pair worths per the limits of LCO 3.1.4.1.c. The NFSC audits these comparisons per both AC 6.5.2.10.a and AC 6.5.2.10.d and is judged to be responsible for assuring this information is factored into the basis for calculating and approving the control rod pair withdrawal sequence for the next cycle. Given the NFSC oversight, the upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. 2/4.1 .4.? Control Rod Worth and Position Reouirtmegjs-Shutdown (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is essentially a reformatting and slight rewording of Interim Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.6. The major word changes reflect that SHUTDOWN MARGIN is "assessed" as opposed to "verified." The specification assures that, during SHUTDOWN and REFUELING, control rod pairs are either fully inserted or, if not fully inserted, are positioned so as to maintain SHUTDOWN MARGIN. If SHUTDOWN MARGIN is not maintained by the positioning of 73 a control rod pairs, reserve shutdown material is to be inserted to restore SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The provisions of this specification supplement and complement those of upgraded LCO/SR 3/4.1.3, Shutdown Margin. The combination of these two specifications account for the unique reactivity control system configuration at FSV and provide a logical and comprehensive functional equivalent to STS LCO/SR 3/4.1.1.2, Shutdown Margin-Tavg a 200'F, and BWR-STS LCO/SR 3/4.1.1, Shutdown Margin. Given the NFSC oversight of the SHUTDOWN MARGIN "assessment" methodology as discussed under the evaluation of upgraded Specification 3/4.1.3, the upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,1 .5 Reactivity Chanon With Temoeraierg (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification reflects a slight rewording of the Interim Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.7. The Interim TS added the beginning of cycle limit on the magnitude of the temperature reactivity defect that was not addressed in the original FSY Specifications LCO 4.1 .5 • and SR 5.1.3. This is an important consideration in evaluating cold SHUTDOWN MARGIN at beginning of cycle when the positive reactivity contribution from reactor core cooldown is greatest due to the large temperature reactivity defect. Evaluation of the measured temperature coefficient of reactivity and its integral over temperature (that is, the reactivity defect) at beginning of cycle is also the basis for assuring that the temperature coefficient at end of cycle is acceptable (that is, at least as negative as the minimum power feedback coefficient assumed in the accident analysis). As indicated in the basis summary statement, the evaluation compares the measured and calculated values of the coefficient and defect at beginning of cycle and infers the effect on values at end of cycle. Per the evaluation of the plant general design criterion given in FSAR Appendix C.8, the power coefficient of reactivity, which is dominated by the temperature coefficient of reactivity (FSAR Section 3.5.5.1), must remain negative throughout core life. Per FSAR Tables 3.5-1, 3.5-4, and 3.5.9, the FSV temperature coefficient of reactivity is least negative at end-of-cycle, although the calculational methods and input data for producing these results are not described nor 'valuated in the FSAR. 74 As indicated per Specification OF 5.3.4, Reload Segment Design, the sign and magnitude of the temperature coefficient is directly related to the allowable maximum control rod pair worth for the control rod pair withdrawal sequence of the reload cycle. The responsibilities and authority of the NFSC with regard to SHUTDOWN MARGIN, which is affected by the magnitude of the temperature defect as noted above, were discussed previously with regard to upgraded Specification SR 4.1.3. Per Specification AC 6.5.2.9.a, the NFSC approves the control rod pair withdrawal sequence and thus is expected to exercise direct cognizance over establishing the acceptability of the evaluation of the measured and calculated values of the temperature coefficient in assuring the acceptability of the withdrawal sequence throughout the reload cycle. Further, NFSC responsibilities with regard to verifying the adequacy of the calculation of the temperature coefficient and to establishing the traceability of current analytical methods to those used in the FSAR (Section 3.5.5.1, although not provided in detail) are evidenced in the review requirements per Specifications AC 6.5.2.8.a and AC 6.5.2.8.h and the audit requirements per Specifications AC 6.5.2.10.a and AC 6.5.2.10.d. Given the understanding of the cognizance exercised by the NFSC in assuring the acceptability both of the calculated values of the temperature defect as affecting SHUTDOWN MARGIN and of the calculated values of the temperature coefficient as affecting the safety analysis of the reload segment design, upgraded FSV Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.5 is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.1,6 Reserve Shutdown Svstem 3/4.1.6.1 Reserve Shutdown Svstem-Oneratinq (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) This specification is a slight reformatting and revision of Interim Specification SR/LCO 3/4.1.8, which is a substantial revision to the existing FSV Specifications LCO 4.1.6 and SR 5.1.2 that have been superseded by the Interim TS. During operation, operability is demonstrated by assuring the capabilities to burst the reserve shutdown hopper rupture disc, which is an action necessary to 75 release the shutdown material into the core, and to provide a diverse backup mechanism to actuate the hopper pressurization valves in the event of loss of electrical power (FSAR Section 3.8.3). The reactivity worth of the reserve shutdown material is given in FSAR Section 3.5.3.3 and Table 3.5.1 . although the analysis methods for nuclear design performance are not presented nor evaluated in the FSAR. Operability of the reserve shutdown system does not depend on the absence of condensed water in the purge gas because that is controlled per Specification LCO 3.1.1 for the operability of the control rod drives, each of which occupies the same penetration as the associated reserve shutdown hopper. However, since long-term exposure to condensed water may affect the insertability of the reserve shutdown material into the core, a surveillance of potentially affected hopper material is provided to test the dropout capability of hopper contents in an excore facility and this surveillance is performed in response to ACTION h.2 in Specification LCO 3.1.1. FSV upgraded Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.6.1 is judged to be functionally equivalent to the 8WR-STS Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.5, Standby Liquid Control System. The FSV reserve shutdown system has greater redundancy than the subject BWR system such that total system inoperability is not expected at FSV. The ACTION times are judged to be appropriate to the FSV system configuration. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.1.6.2 Reserve Shutdown System-Shutdown (Specification carryover from existing interim TS) The Reserve Shutdown System-Shutdown of the existing interim TS 3.1.9 was carried over into the TSUP Section 3.1.6.2. The interim TS 3.1.9 was approved by the NRC Staff in a Safety Evaluation transmitted by letter dated July 23, 198581 for interim use until a final control rod drive TS section was amended to the License. The Licensee in the final Draft TSUP of November 30, 1985 had deleted the requirement for the Reserve Shutdown System (RSD) in the Shutdown and Refueling Modes. The Licensee's justification was that the purpose of the RSO was to provide sufficient negative reactivity control to: "1. Ensure reactor shutdown to refueling temperatures in the absence of all control rod pairs (FSAR Sections 3.5.3 and 3.8.3), and 76 "2. Provide an absorber material that maintains stability during high core temperatures that may be present during Design Basis Accident #1, Permanent Loss of Forced Circulation described in FSAR Section 14.10." The Licensee further argued that the RSO was only required to be operable during Power, Low Power, and Startup in the existing Technical Specification LCD 4.1,6. The Licensee also stated that "Because of the proximity to the control rod pairs, it has almost no additional worth when inserted into regions where the control rod pairs are inserted." Also, the Licensee stated that "Specification 3.1.4.2 insures that either control rod pairs or reserve shutdown material have been inserted into the core following each controlled or automatic reactor shutdown. It further requires that all control rod pairs will be fully inserted and will be made incapable of being withdrawn except those required for either refueling, repair, or test. This is accomplished by either placing the reactor mode switch in the "off" position, or disabling the electrical supply to the drive motors. "Per the surveillance requirement of Specification 4.1.4.2 c, prior to the removal of more than one control rod drive assembly from the PCRV, the SHUTDOWN MARGIN must be explicitly calculated per the requirements of Specification 3/4.1.3. It has already been shown by analyses in FSAR Section 3.5.3 that a SHUTDOWN MARGIN of greater than 0.01 delta k is always available with just one control rod pair fully withdrawn." The Licensee then went through a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for control rod pair withdrawal during refueling to show that an inadvertent criticality would be incredible. Essential to the Licensee's argument was the tracking of count rate on two source range channels during the required maximum 20 inch incremental withdrawals of a control rod pair. 77 • • Although the Licensee's arguments demonstrate that control rod pair withdrawal during refueling is done in a very controlled manner using well-defined operating procedures, tracking of count rate on two channels, operability of startup channel plant protective scram, and various operator checks, the overall level of safety is similar to that typically employed throughout the industry during refueling evolutions. In addition to a very high level of procedural , operational , and instrumentation safety, however, prevention of inadvertent criticality has always involved the double contingency principle of incorporating sufficient factors of safety to require at least two gross, independent, and concurrent changes before an accidental criticality is possible (see ANS-8.I/N16.1-1969) . Although not stated explicitly in the Standard Review Plan, the double contingency principle, is invoked by requirements for single failure protection, see GDC 26 and 27 on the requirement for two independent reactivity control systems and the multiple requirements of SRP Sections 9.1.1, New Fuel Storage, and 9. 1.2, Spent Fuel Storage, especially the requirement for Keff <0.95 for a fully loaded and flooded, with unborated water, fuel storage rack. The Keff 50.95 is implemented in the LWR STS in Section 3.9.1 during refueling. The analogous specification for boiling water reactors which do not have borated liquid control is Specification 3.1.5, Standby Liquid Control System. Thus, in addition, to the rod control system de-energized, count rate channel and startup rate scram operability, procedure and operator cautions, the LWR and BWR have the backup during refueling of either a large shutdown condition, Keff <0.95, or of a backup shutdown capability, the Standby Liquid Control System. Thus the NRC Staff directed PSC in the Request for Additional Information of July 2, 198721 to reconsider instituting the RSO in the Shutdown and Refueling modes. The subsequent carryover by PSC of the interim specification for RSO during Shutdown and Refueling to the TSUP adequately addresses operability of the system. It also complements Actions b.2 and c.2.b of Specification 3.1.3 on shutdown margin of activating sufficient reserve shutdown material for assuring a 0.01 delta k Shutdown Margin. In addition, an important wording change was made in that the wording in the ACTION has been changed to "assess" SHUTDOWN MARGIN 78 consistent with changes made to upgraded Specification SR 4.1.3 from the Interim TS. Given NFSC oversight of SHUTDOWN MARGIN "assessments" and the incorporation of the double contingency principle as noted above, the specification is judged to be acceptable for the same reasons as given above for Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.6.1. 3/4.1 .7 Reactivity Status (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a reformatting of existing Specifications LCO 4. 1.8 and SR 5. 1.4. The specification tracks the difference between the observed and expected (calculated) core reactivity by use of the cycle-dependent base reactivity curve. The reactivity difference cannot exceed 0.01 delta-k, which is the minimum required cold SHUTDOWN MARGIN per Specification LCO 3.1.3. Although not described in the FSAR, the cycle-dependent base reactivity curve and changes thereto are reviewed and approved by the NFSC per Specification AC 6.5.2.9.b. Other NFSC responsibilities with regard to assuring the adequacy of the base reactivity curve for each reload cycle are also indicated with regard to the review of safety significant design changes per Specifications AC 6.5.2.8.a and AC 6.5.2.8.h and with regard to audits per Specifications AC 6.5.2. 10.a. AC 6.5.2. 10.c, and AC 6.5.2.10.d. The carryover specification is judged to be functionally equivalent in intent to BWR-STS Specification LCO/SR 3/4.1.2, Reactivity Anomalies, in that both specifications use observed core conditions to indirectly assess the potential effect on SHUTDOWN MARGIN as indicated in the basis summary statements of the respective specifications. At FSV, the periodic (once per 7 days) tracking of the difference between observed and expected reactivity can also be indicative of other long term burnup effects such as changes in control rod worth, temperature coefficient of reactivity, and axial power distribution. Since none of these effects are otherwise observed directly throughout the reload cycle burnup, the reactor operations staff and the NFSC are expected to examine trends in the reactivity deviations as part of good engineering practice43-47 in effecting the safe operation of the facility. This expectation occurs independent of the basis 79 r NENNEEMMEMINa summary statement for this TS since the NFSC is judged to have this responsibility per the provisions of the above-cited Specification ACs. Given the NFSC approval authority and the expected degree of NFSC oversight, the specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.2 CORE IRRADIATION. TEMPERATURE AND FLOW LIM)�TC, 3/4,2, 1 Core Irradiation (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a substantial revision of existing Specification LCO 4. 1. 1. A surveillance requirement has been added, and an exposure limit on control rods has been included in the LCO (FSAR Section 3.8.1.2) . During NRC review of the preliminary draft, the NRC requested deletion of the least limiting of the dual limits on fuel elements as given in the existing specification. The 1800 EFPO limit was retained, and the fuel average burnup limit of 110,000 MWO per tonne of heavy metal (uranium plus thorium) was deleted. Per FSAR Section 3.2.1, the limit of 110,000 MWO per tonne of heavy metal is that to which the fuel is designed for the equilibrium cycle. However, at full power (842 MW-thermal) and given the reference uranium and thorium loadings of the equilibrium cycle reload segments per FSAR Section 3.5.2.1, the average burnup for a fully irradiated (1800 EFPD) reload segment corresponds to only 96,412 MWO per tonne of heavy metal . assuming uniform exposure on a per-segment basis. The upgraded specification is judged to be conservative and acceptable. 24,2.? Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Reason Outlet Temperature Limits (Specification carryover from existing TS) The upgraded specification is a revision of existing Specification LCO 4.1.7. The title has been changed to reflect that the limits apply to the region outlet temperature as well as the inlet flow orifice position (FSAR Sections 3.6.2. 3.6.7, and 3.9) . A surveillance requirement has been added, and the limits on comparison regions (FSAR Section 3.6.6.3) have been placed in a separate upgraded specification. The comparison regions are used to establish flow requirements (that is, inlet orifice valve positions) for the regions lacking trustworthy coolant outlet temperature indication. 80 Existing Specification Figure 4.1.7-1 has been revised as upgraded Specification Figure 3.2.2-1 to more clearly illustrate the prohibited and allowable operating limits for region outlet tc.nperature mismatch under different operating conditions of core average inlet temperature and core average temperature rise. These limits in effect restrict region outlet temperature mismatch to within the values assumed in Specification SL 2. 1.1. When the core average outlet temperature is less than 950'F, the further provisions of upgraded Specification LCO 3.2.4 are invoked to cover low flow conditions that can occur in the LOW POWER operating mode. The specification is unique to prismatic HTGRs and is not supplemented by in-core power maps because instrumentation did not exist for reliably performing such maps in a high temperature environment at the time FSV was licensed. Other than for neutron distribution measurements to infer in-core power distributions, there are no functionally equivalent specifications for PWRs or BWRs. The upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. x/4.2.3 Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Comparison Re i n (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a reformatting, revision, and combination of the portion of existing Specification LCO 4.1.7 that relates to comparison regions and of existing Specification SR 5.1.7 with regard to comparison region surveillances (FSAR Section 3.6.6.3) . Comparison regions are those similarly fueled and rodded regions that are in symmetric locations to the grouping of regions that have known inadequacies in the measurement of outlet gas flow temperature. These measurements inadequacies are due to intermittent bypass gas flows that can overcool the thermocouples used to measure the outlet temperature. The objective of the upgraded specification is to assure that the measured relative region power density (called the region peaking factor or RPF) is not less than 10% smaller than the calculated region relative power density for those core regions that are used as comparison regions. The RPF is the ratio of region average power density to core average power density (hence, the term relative power density is used commonly throughout most of the rest of the industry). At FSV, the measured RPF is inferred from the product of the inferred region coolant flow temperature increase (that is, 81 the difference between normalized thermocouple readings of core inlet and region outlet coolant temperatures) and the inferred region coolant mass flow (that is, as inferred both from the orifice setting that dominates changes in regionwise flow resistance and from total core flow that can be inferred from either circulator rotational speeds or circulator outlet pressure-differential flow meters) . The specification assures that the controlled region that relies on a comparison region to infer region, gas flow temperature rise will have an acceptable basis for establishing flow requirements for that region under upgraded Specification LCO 3.2.2. The acceptable basis is that the comparison of calculated and measured RPF in the comparison region either agrees within 10%, yields a measured value that is higher than the calculated value, or provides for quantifying the percent measured-to-calculated discrepancy so that a correction can be made to the measured value when used for comparison. As indicated in the basis summary statement for upgraded Specification LCO 3.1.4.1, Control Rod Pair Position and Worth Requirements. and in Specification OF 5.3.4, Reload Segment Design, one of the objectives in the selection of the control rod pair withdrawal sequence is to "satisfy the criteria for reactor power distribution" wherein the criteria for acceptable RPFs (that is, relative power densities) are provided in Specification OF 5.3.4. Per the NFSC's responsibilities for review, approval and audit as given, respectively, in Specifications AC 6.5.2.8.a, AC 6.5.2.8.h, AC 6.5.2.9.a, AC 6.5.2.10.a, AC 6.5.2.10.c, and AC 6.5.2.10.d. the determination and application of the calculated region RPFs and the trending in evaluated discrepancies between measured and calculated RPFs are judged to be appropriate items to be followed by the NFSC to assure the quality level of the methodology employed in selecting the control rod pair withdrawal sequence and thus to assure also the safety of core operation. Given NFSC oversight for assuring the accuracy and conservatism of the methods employed, this specification is judged to be acceptable. 2L4,2-4 Core Inlet Orifice Valves/Minimum Helium F ow and Maximum Core Temneratt're Rise. (Specification carryover from existing TS) This 82 specification is a reformatting of the recently approved (License Amendment No. 57) revisions to existing Specifications LCO 4.1 .9 and SR 5.1.8. This specification applies (1) when the Core Average Outlet Temperature is less than 950°F per upgraded Specification LCO 3.2.2.b, (2) when the core thermal power level falls below 25% of rated by heat balance, and (3) when, in SHUTDOWN and REFUELING, the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeds 760°F. The specification assures adequate helium cooling flow through the downflow core at low heat loads and pressure drops where the buoyancy effects of heated helium could cause channel flow stagnation and local overheating of the fuel if the pressure drop due to the inlet orifice setting were allowed to be too large. The specification of the allowable region inlet orifice settings has been conservatively developed to avoid core channel flow instabilities for the pressurized and partially depressurized reactor for a range of core heat loads that accommodates fission heating below 25% of rated thermal power as well as decay and residual (stored) heat loads down to a core average temperature of 760°F. Below a core average temperature of 760'F, the combination of decay and residual (stored) heat loads could not cause local overheating of the fuel for many hours in the absence of all flow. Otherwise, if reactor core cooling flow is lost for conditions under which this specification applies, the reactor is to be depressurized per upgraded Specification LCO 3.4.1 to facilitate the PCRV containment function in retaining radioactive fission products that may be released from the core if the fuel were to be damaged from overheating. The upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.2.5 Region Constraint Devices (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a revision of existing Specification SR 5.2.26 to include an LCO. As described in FSAR Section 3.3.1.1, the Region Constraint Devices, which are located on top of plenum elements of generally three adjacent fuel regions, restrain region movements in relation to one another by means of centering pins inserted in the handling hole of the upper plenum elements. The RCDs are used to limit horizontal movement of the fuel columns which mitigates temperature fluctuations in the primary 83 coolant circuit at the individual core region outlets as discussed in FSAR Section 3.6.6. Visually inspecting the RCDs will ensure that they are performing their design function by restraining the fuel columns. Monitoring the lifting force required to remove the RCDs with the fuel handling machine will provide early indications of degradation in function. Monitoring the vertical location coordinate ensures that the RCDs have been properly installed with the pins engaged i.n the plenum elements. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.2.6 Power-to-Flow Ratio (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a revision and combination of that portion of existing Specification SL 3.1 that addressed immediate operator responses to observed plant transients involving a power-to-flow ratio imbalance and of existing Specification SR 5.1.6 with regard to the mechanism for assessing the degree of challenge to the safety limit. The challenge results from a power-to-flow imbalance that exceeds a specified threshold (upgraded Specification Figure 3.2.6-1). The carryover of existing Specification SL 3.1 into upgraded Specification SL 2.1.1 has been discussed previously. FSAR Section 3.6.7 describes the instrumentation systems that alert the operator to the potential existence of a core power-to-flow ratio imbalance, and FSAR Sections 3.6.7.6 and 3.6.8 describe the technical bases for the allowed response times to such imbalances and for determining the degree of challenge posed to the safety limit. Very rapid transients involving a high power-to-flow ratio imbalance have a lag time since the high (conservative) temperatures that are assumed in the calculations of fuel particle migration (see discussion in previous evaluation of Specification SL 2.1.1) take time to develop because of the high heat capacity of the graphite core. Thus, in rapid transients, the core temperature lags behind the steady state assumptions used to quantify the safety limit. Such transients, which should be readily detected and • responded to by the Plant Protection System, require a prompt response from 84 the operator but, if quickly terminated, may not contribute to the challenge to the safety limit because of the thermal sluggishness of the core. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4,3.1 Plant Protective Svstem. (Outside the scope of TSUP) The Plant Protective System section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LCO 4.4.1 and SR 5.4.1, but was significantly improved to account for instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpoint and the allowable value. As indicated in Section I.6. 1 of this report, the plant protective system review was outside the scope of the TSUP. The technical justification for acceptance of the Licensee's improvements of the plant protective system section is, therefore, not the subject of this report, but may be found in the references of the summary discussion of Section 1.6.1 of this report. The trip setpoints were changed and allowable values were established to account for instrumentation inaccuracy per the methodology of the Instrument Society of America Standard $67.04-1982, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation Used in Nuclear Power Plants." For the interim the approved Amendment No. 6039 Licensee's amendment application letter of February 8, 1988, for the plant protective system section was converted to the TSUP format and was found acceptable. The information provided by the Licensee in Section 3.3.1 of the TSUP is consistent with FSAR Chapters 7.0, Instrumentation and Control , and 14, Safety Analysis. The review of the PPS submittal on including instrumentation inaccuracy, identified; a number of concerns that will be pursued outside the scope of the TSUP. These other concerns which will be the subject of separate future licensing actions are summarized in the following paragraphs. 85 There were many concerns relative to the existing licensing basis in the FSAR, for example, justification of permissible bypass conditions and accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy for the Rod Withdrawal Prohibit setpoints, circulator trip function programmed feedwater flow-low, and circulator trip function fixed feedwater flow-low. These concerns were outside the scope of the TSUP and will be pursued by the NRC Staff as separate licensing issues. Many concerns were also identified within the scope of the TSUP but also will be treated in future licensing actions. These concerns within the scope of the TSUP were related to making the technical specifications more complete and accurate by including the following additional trip functions and their setpoints from the FSAR: - Wide Range Channel Rate of Change-High Scram, - Primary Coolant Moisture High Level Monitor and Loop Monitor, - Circulator Speed-Low (programmed curves), - Trip Setpoints, Delay Times, and Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage, Loss of Voltage Automatic Throw Over, and Loss of Voltage-DG Start, Load Shed and Load Sequence, - Loop shutdown and rod withdrawal prohibits for - Startup Channel Rate of Change-High, - Wide Range Channel Rate of Change-High - Linear Channel-High Power RWP (Channels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) and Multiple Rod Pair Withdrawal . Also, the PPS surveillance and calibration requirements section should be upgraded to include STS type testing specifications such as Channel Check, Channel Functional Test, Actuation Logic Test and applicable modes. The Licensee committed to do these upgrades and the NRC Staff agreed that since the PPS was being handled outside the scope of the TSUP and since the Licensee had significantly improved the PPS section in their amendment 86 application submittal of February 8, 1988 by accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy in the majority of the trip setpoints, that the open items enumerated above could be processed separately in future licensing actions outside of the TSUP. One other area where the technical specifications lack completeness relative to the existing licensing basis in the FSAR is in the _ lack of specifications on response time, STS Table 3.2-2, and the error allowance components of "TA, S, and T, and STS Table 2.2-1, for the PPS trips. In the NRC letter of May 30, I986, Enclosure 3, PSC was asked to — clarify how any of their safety analyses that involve trip actuation on a plant variable has any validity without consideration of response time to calculate overshoot and variable changes from the time the trip signal value is reached until trip actuation actually occurs. PSC in their letter of November 27, 1985, Attachment 2, stated that: — "The proposed FSV Technical Specifications do not contain requirements for response time testing as that would involve a backfit issue and therefore is not a part of the Technical Specification Upgrade — Program." Scram response time testing was part of the PPS system qualification, see FSAR Section 7.1 .1.2. Also, the Licensee's interim amendment application dated June 21, 1985 71 Attachment 4, accounted for transient time response in the analysis to satisfy ISA $67.04-1982 for including instrumentation inaccuracy. Also, in Attachment 3 to the Licensee's most recent PPS amendment application, February 8, 1988, the Licensee in its discussion of methodology notes that transient time response characteristics were considered in the determination of the analysis value. However, the NRC Staff in the meeting of October 1-2, 198614 accepted that the response time issue was outside the scope of the TSUP. Similarly, although the concern was never formalized to PSC as was done for response time, the technical specifications lack completeness because they do not specify the components of the error allowances, see STS Table 2.2-1, of "TA, S, and Z." Although, it is clear from the evaluations done by PSC to satisfy the ISA 87 $67.04-1982 methodology for accounting for instrumentation inaccuracy, that the analogous parameters were determined and used for the Fort St. Vrain PPS trips, they have not been specified in the TSUP. This issue was not pursue with the Licensee as it parallels the situation just discussed for the transient response time. That is, it is outside the scope of the TSUP and should be pursued as a separate future licensing action. 3/4.3.2 Monitoring Instrumentation. 314.3.2.1 Analytical Moisture Monitors. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Analytical Moisture Monitor TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LC0 4.4.5 and SR 5.4.12. The analytical moisture monitors have no direct comparable in the STS. Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Analytical Moisture Monitor Section in the specifications, action statements, and surveillances. The specification was clarified by distinguishing requirements for entry into and operation in Startup from Shutdown and Low Power and the actions were placed under the Action statements. Also, it was clarified that the PPS dewpoint moisture monitors are valid alternate instrumentation when placed in the "indicate mode. " Two analytical moisture monitors are specified when approaching Startup from Shutdown and only one when approaching Startup from Lower Power as past experience has been that the moisture problem is most significant when approaching Startup from Shutdown. This clarification of two versus one operable analytical moisture monitor was carried through to the action statements. The actions were expanded to allow either a mode change to Lower Power or the existing requirement of shutdown in 12 hours with one inoperable instrument (while in Startup from Shutdown). For no operable analytical moisture monitors, the action was relaxed from be in Shutdown immediately to either be in Shutdown or Low Power within 90 minutes. The surveillances were improved by the addition of channel checks and sample line flow rate and sample line heat tracing verification. The TSUP specifications for the Analytical Moisture monitors properly reflect FSAR requirements. The analytical moisture monitors are 88 used below 5% power as a backup to the PPS dewpoint moisture monitors which may become uncertain due to low circulator AP (see FSAR Section 7.3.2.1), The PPS dewpoint moisture monitors are specified in TS Section 3.3.1 and are relied on for reactor scram, loop shutdown, and steam water dump for fast moisture ingress events (steam generator tube leakage/rupture) . The analytical moisture monitors are used to determine compliance with chemical impurities in the primary coolant system (see TS Section 3.4.3 and 3.4.4) . The 90 minutes operator action time for shutdown with no operable analytical moisture monitors is based on the analysis summary presented in FSAR Section 14.5.2.2, Steam-Carbon Reactions (see FSAR p. 14-5-10 paragraph titled Fuel Elements) . For operation up to 5% power, 6700 seconds are required to cause the limiting 1% weight loss in the hottest fuel element. The surveillance requirements for heat tracing ensure that sample moisture content will not be affected by condensation in the sample line (see FSAR Section 7.3.2.1). 3/4.3.2.2 Radiation Monitorina Instrumentation. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation section of the existing Specifications LCO 4.4.3 and SR 5.4.9 was carried over but was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Section 3.3.3.1 and to meet the requirements of NUREG-0737 (see Section 1.6.2 of this report) . OPERABILITY with Alarm/Trip Setpoints and instrumentation ranges was specified. Applicability and Actions were clearly defined and Channel Check and Analog Channel Operational Tests were added. The radiation monitoring instrumentation channels now specified in Table 3.3-6 identify the more safety significant instrumentation for the reactor building, exhaust ventilation, new fuel storage building, steam water dump tank, and PCRV relief piping. This is in contrast to the less safety significant area monitors in the present TS groupings which included walkway, stairwell , wall , and office building monitors. The upgraded radiation monitoring instrumentation specified is consistent with FSAR Section 7.3.5 and FSAR Table 7.3-2. The basis for TSUP Section 3/4.3.2.2 identifies the location in the upgraded TS for the remaining safety significant radiation monitoring instruments of FSAR Section 7.3.5. The accident monitor on the Refueling Floor - East Wall (RT-93250-14) serves as the high-range radiation monitor required by NUREG 0737, Item 1I.F.1.3. 89 3/4,3.2,3 Seismic Instrumentation (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a revision and expansion of existing Specifications LC0 4.4.4 and SR 5.4.10 to more closely follow the provisions of STS LC0/SR 3/4.3.3.3. All triaxial time-history accelerographs and vertical seismic triggers as previously installed at FSV are required to be operable (FSAR Section 7.3.9), but, consistent with the TSUP scope guidelines for limiting the backfitting of STS requirements (see Appendix A to this TER), no new or additional seismic instrumentation has been installed to equate numerically to that required in the 575. However, the FSV seismoscopes, which are noncalibratable smoked glass motion indicators (FSAR Section 7.3.9), have been included in the upgraded specifications to assure diversity and redundancy in seismic event detection. Channel calibration for all out-of-calibration seismic instruments found following a seismic event is to be performed within 30 days following the seismic event as opposed to within 10 days for all seismic instruments per the STS, Because FSV cannot perform the channel calibration on site, a channel functional test is performed within 5 days followed by offsite channel calibration for those found out-of-calibration. This allows time to keep the instrumentation in use on site to record potential aftershocks. The Special Report of seismic effects is required within 14 days as opposed to 10 days to allow adequate time for recording and evaluation of aftershocks. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.3 9 4 setenrnlnatcal Instrumentation (Specification adapted from STS) This specification is equivalently worded to, if not exactly worded as, STS LCO/SR 3/4.3.3.4, Meteorological Instrumentation. The TS reflects the current guidance given in proposed Revision I to Regulatory Guide 1.23 (Reference 82). This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.3.?..5 Fire Detection and Alarm System. (Specification adapted from STS) The Fire Detection and Alarm System section was adapted 90 from the STS Section 3.3.3.8 along with carryover from existing FSV Specifications LCO 4.10.3 and SR 5.4.2. The LCO, Applicability, and surveillance requirements have been substantially augmented and are essentially those of the STS. In the LCO, all the fire detection instruments in the existing TS Section 4.10.3 have been carried over. In addition, the fire detection instruments per STS guidelines have been added for where other safety related equipment is located. These other safety related equipment are: Building 10. battery room exhaust ducts, hydraulic valve area, hydraulic power unit; turbine plant, service water pump building, circulating water makeup pump building, reactor plant exhaust filter, and diesel generator rooms. The TSUP Action statements are mostly carryovers from the existing TS 4.10.3 except that with less than the minimum required operable instruments after 14 days, the TSUP action is to file a report with the Commission whereas the existing FSV TS requires shutdown after 30 days, but no additional action after 14 days. The STS, in this situation, requires a firewatch patrol to inspect the areas once per hour as also does the TSUP. Although the TSUP not requiring shutdown after 30 days like the existing FSV TS is a relaxation, the TSUP is still as restrictive as the STS in this situation. The TSUP continues to have no action statement for when less than the installed number of instruments but more than the "minimum required to be operable" are operable. The TSUP Fire Detection and Alarm System TS is judged acceptable as it represents a significant improvement over the existing FSV TS and is basically adapted from the STS, as noted above, and implements the requirements of FSAR Sections 9.12.2.2, 9.12.3.2, 9.12.5, and 9.12.6. 3/4.3.2.6 Chlorine Detection and Alarm System (Outside the scope of the TSUP) The Chlorine Detection and Alarm System TS is acceptable for the interim but is an open issue outside the TSUP relative to compliance with Generic Letter 83-36, 37. The technical justification for acceptance of the Licensee's new section on the Chlorine Detection and Alarm System, patterned after STS Section 3.3.3.7, is therefore, not the subject of this report, but may be found in the references of the summary discussion of Section 1.6.1 of this report. 91 No additional conversion to the TSUP was necessary as the Chlorine Detection and Alarm System was specified by the licensee in the TSUP even though the review was outside the scope of the TSUP. As this section is new, it is an added commitment by the Licensee over and above the existing TSs. Rather than the two independent chlorine detection and alarm systems specified in the Generic Letters 83-36, 37 the NRC had previously accepted$3 that only one was required at FSV. The specified action time by PSC of 24 hours or establish a watch does not comply with the Generic Letter 83.36, 37 guideline of one hour to restore the inoperable system or place the control room emergency ventilation system in the recirculation mode, and is still an open licensing issue that will be processed by a future separate licensing action. The specified surveillances are very close to those of the STS and the Generic Letters 83-36, 37. As the STS Section 3.3.3.7 has incorporated the requirements of the Generic Letters 83-36. 37, the review against the Generic Letters 83-36, 37 more than encompasses the review for the TSUP alone. The toxic gas protection required for the control room is presented in FSAR Section 7.4.1 and these requirements have appropriately been incorporated into the technical specifications. Thus new Section 3/4.3.2.6 on the Chlorine Detection and Alarm System is acceptable subject to the ongoing resolution for the action in the event of an inoperable system. 3/4.3.2.7 Power-to-Flow Ratio Instrumentation System (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and expansion of existing Specification SR 5.4.8 to include an LCO that was merely implied and not quantified in terms of acceptable ACTION statements by the existing SR. The system is briefly described in FSAR Sections 3.6.7.1 and 7.3.11. The system operates continuously and has no automatic actuation function. Backup instrumentation can be used if the system is inoperable. The upgraded TS most closely resembles, in terms of functional equivalence, STS LCO/SR 3/4.3.3.6, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation; however, the condition monitored and recorded at FSV is the profile of a power-to-flow imbalance or transient to allow post-transient 92 assessment of the degree of challenge to Specification SL 2.1.1, which is discussed previously in this TER. In another sense, the instrumentation system is somewhat functionally analogous to the recording and analysis devices that would be addressed in the non-TS implementing procedures for STS LCO/SR 3/4.3.3.2, Movable Incore Detectors, that are used for assessing compliance with the associated TS in STS Section 3/4.2, Power Distribution Limits. However, the condition monitored and recorded at FSV is the result of a transient compared to a safety limit and not solely the continued assurance of initial conditions for design basis accidents or transients as in the PWR. Thus, the function of the instrumentation system is unique to FSV but can be described as being addressed in the TS consistent with that of virtually analogous functions in the STS. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 2/4.3.7.8 Core Region Outlet Thermocquzles (Specification adapted from STS) This specification is for instrumentation that is used to support assessing compliance with core region power-to-flow limits per Specifications LCO/SR 3/4.2.2, LCO/SR 3/4.2.3, and LCO/SR 3/4.2.4 as well as backup instrumentation for core power-to-flow transient assessment per LC0/SR 3/4.2.6. The specification is functionally analogous to STS LCO/SR 3/4.3.3.2, Movable Incore Detectors, but is written to reflect the unique need in the large prismatic HTGR to infer core and region power-to-Flow ratio as opposed to fission power distribution in the PWR. The specification accounts for the redundancy in the thermocouples used in FSV (FSAR Section 3.6.7) . The specification is judged to be acceptable. x/4.3.3 Three Room Control Complex Temperature Monitoring. (Specification carryover from Existing TS) The Three Room Control Complex Temperature Monitoring TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from existing Specifications LCO 4.4.2 and SR 5.4.7. Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Three Room Control Complex Temperature Monitoring Section to make it comparable to the STS Section 3/4.7.13. Area Temperature Monitoring. The specification was improved by adding the auxiliary electric equipment room and the 480 volt switchgear room, and the 93 temperature limit was lowered to 115°F from 120'F to account for instrument inaccuracy. The applicability was expanded to all times. The action statements were added to agree with those of the STS. The surveillance was changed to perform a temperature check once per 24 hours and deleted requiring a monthly functional test and an annual calibration. Consistent with the STS philosophy and as explained in the Licensee's letter of June 14, 19882 on justification for significant relaxations or deletions from the current specifications, (see, for example, LCO 3.7.1 .2-5 or 3.7.2-3 discussion) instrumentation not required for monitoring core performance or initiating automatic protective actions does not have functional or calibration testing specified in the technical specifications. Thus, deletion of the monthly test and annual calibration of the control room temperature monitors is acceptable. The TSUP specifications for the three room control complex temperature monitoring properly reflect the FSAR Section 7.4.1 requirements. Control room control boards, modules and drawers have been successfully tested at 120°F and above and are catalog rated at 120'F. Essential equipment in the 480 V switchgear room is rated at 120'F or better. FSAR Table 7.4-1 shows that under failures of the three room control complex HVAC, temperatures remain below the 115'F specification. Also, FSAR Section 7.4.1 states that calculated temperatures at the end of a 12 hour fire (ventilation shutdown, room isolation, and halon injection) the II5'F specification is not exceeded. 3/4.4 PRIMARY COOIANT 3/4.4.1 Primary Coolant Logos and Coolant Circulation 1/4.4.1 .1 Primary Coolant L000s and Coolant Circulation - Above 5% PnwPr (Specification adapted from STS) This specification is new. The specification reflects the allowable forced circulation cooling configurations for FSV power operation per FSAR Section 4.3 and provides functional consistency with the intent and provisions of STS LCO/SR 3/4.4.1.1, Startup and Power Operation. The new specification provides for 94 distinguishing between the helium circulator functional requirements for being in operation on steam or water turbine drive for normal process cooling and being operable on water turbine drive for safe shutdown cooling. The specification also incorporates the appropriate ACTIONs to effect shutdown and reactor depressurization if all forced circulation cooling is lost for an extended period of time; the requirement and timing for depressurization were carried over from existing Specification LCO 4.2.18, Primary Coolant Depressurization. The upgraded specification complements the TS limits for assuring adequate core and regionwise power-to-flow ratio as stipulated in Section 3/4.2 of the upgraded TS. This is done by specifying the required operating configuration of the primary coolant system equipment as a function of core power level . A detailed functional evaluation of this specification is provided in Section 4.2 of the ORNL TER (Reference 53) on the upgraded TS for FSV cooling functions. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.4.1.2 Primary Coolant Lout and Coolant Circulation - Below 5% Power (Specification adapted from STS) This specification is new and supplements LCO/SR 3/4.4.1.1 that is discussed above. The specification is functionally consistent with the intent and provisions of STS LCO/SR 3/4.4.1.1, LCO/SR 3/4.4.1.2, and LCO/SP, 3/4.4.1.3 with regard to providing an adequate primary coolant system equipment configuration during the FSV conditions of reactor startup and equivalent hot shutdown. During shutdown at FSV, the functional equivalent to hot shutdown has been established as effectively existing when the core average temperature (that is, the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature) exceeds 760°F. Below 760'F, forced circulation cooling is not required because there are significant thermal margins to temperatures at which the primary coolant system structures and the fuel fission product barriers would begin to be damaged. Otherwise above 760'F, one operating primary coolant loop consisting of at least one operating helium circulator and one operating steam generator section is required for the conditions for which Specification LCO 3.4.1.2 applies. If forced circulation cooling is lost for an extended period, the specification provides for depressurization of the reactor to mitigate the challenge to PCRV containment by core heatup. 95 This specification is evaluated in detail in Sections 4.2 and 4.3.4 of the ORNL cooling function TER (Reference 53) with regard to the functions of normal process cooling and residual heat removal . The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.4,7 Primary Coolant Activity (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is a combination and upgrade of existing FSV Specifications LCO 4.2.8, Primary Coolant Activity Limits, SR 5.2.6, Plateout Probe, and SR 5.2.11, Primary Reactor Coolant Radioactivity. The upgraded TS is functionally analogous to STS LGO/SR 3/4.4.8, Specific Activity, but is structured to retain the limits of the existing specifications that reflect the unique features and operating conditions of a HTGR as compared to the LWR. The upgraded TS includes limits on both circulating and plateout activity (FSAR Sections 3.7, 9.4, and 14.12). In HTGRs, plateout activity is important in the assessment of blowdown source terms due to plateout liftoff during a postulated rapid depressurization accident (FSAR Sections 3.7 and 14.11). The carryover surveillance on the plateout probe is the basis for assessing the continued conservatism in FSAR assumptions for accident analysis. The definitions for Oose Equivalent I.131 and E-BAR (the average beta-gamma decay or disintegration energy) have been added to Section 1 of the upgraded TS consistent with the format of the STS but reflecting both the accident analysis assumptions and the limit assessment techniques that are employed at FSV. FSV currently operates well below limits on the coolant activity and plateout activity. This specification complements the provisions of upgraded Specification LC0/5R 3/4.7.5, Primary Coolant Depressurization, that provides for the operability of the Helium Purification System. The HPS is normally operating to assure meeting primary coolant limits on both radioactivity and impurity levels but is also relied upon as a Class 1 safety-related system to assure containment integrity by providing for a filtered depressurization during the permanent loss of forced cooling accident (FSAR Section 14.10). LCO 3.4.2 assures that circulating activity is within the initial condition assumed in the accident analyses. 96 A The upgraded specification is judged to be acceptable. 1/4.4.3 Primary Coolant Impurity Levels--Hich Temperature (Specification carryover from existing TS) The specification is an upgrading and combination of the existing Specification LCO 4.2.10 and associated SR 5.2.12 as well as existing surveillances for potential impurity-induced structural effects as provided in existing Specifications SR 5.2.22, PGX Graphite, and SR ,5.2.25, Core Support. A fuel surveillance program that addresses the detection of impurity-induced effects on the fuel particles is effected outside the TS. The specification LCO is applicable when Core Average Outlet Temperature is greater than 1200'F. The TS provides limits on primary coolant oxidant (02, CO2, and CO) levels that are imposed to mitigate the effects of graphite oxidation and carbon mass transport from the core to cooler surfaces such as the steam generator tubes and PCRV liner surface (FSAR Sections 4.2.1 and 9.4.2) . Surveillances of the PGX graphite specimens and of the core support blocks, which are manufactured from PGX graphite, provide assurance that safety-related graphite structures are maintaining adequate mass and strength and are not subject to unanticipated preferential degradation under allowed oxidant impurity levels (FSAR Section 3.3.2.2 and Appendix A.I2). The basis summary statement identifies the instrumentation and alarms, including the PPS moisture monitors, that are available to alert the operator of conditions that indicate a potential for increased oxidant levels in the coolant. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.4.4 Primary Coolant impurity Levels--Low Temperature (Specification carryover from existing TS. This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.11 and SR 5.2.12 as applicable when the reactor is generating fission energy and the Core Average Outlet Temperature is less than 1200°F. The oxidant (H20, CO2, and CO) limits under these conditions are based on preventing the corrosion of metallic components and the oxidation of the boron carbide in burnable poisons (FSAR Sections 4.2.1 and 9.4.2). The specification is judged to be acceptable. 97 2/4.5 SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SYSTEMS 3/4.5.1 Helium Circulators 3/4,5.1. 1 Helium Circulators--CRCT above 760 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.1 and SR 5.2.7. As in the existing specification. one helium circulator in each of the two primary coolant loops is required to be operable on its associated water turbine drive for purposes of performing safe shutdown cooling (FSAR Sections 10.3.9 and 14.4.2.2) . Safe shutdown cooling is the functional equivalent at FSV of emergency core cooling at a PWR. The equipment supporting the capability for water turbine drive for safe shutdown cooling is Class I and is seismically and environmentally qualified. A detailed functional evaluation of this specification is provided in Sections 4.1 and 4.4 of Reference 53. This specification is applicable whenever the reactor is generating fission heat at a rate exceeding 5% of rated reactor power and otherwise when the Calculated Sulk Core Temperature exceeds 760°F. The STS restoration time of 72 hours has been adopted for the inoperability of a single train; one hour for both trains. The time period to achieve shutdown given failure to restore the inoperable equipment is 24 hours based on the period allowed in the existing specifications. This allowance is consistent with the larger thermal margins and longer thermal response times of the FSV ceramic graphite core, and the low doses calculated for the permanent loss of forced cooling accident (FSAR Section 14.I0 and Appendix 0). Operability of the helium circulators on steam drive is assured for normal operation by upgraded Specification LCO 3.4.1, which has been discussed previously in this TER. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,5.1.? Helium Circulators--CBCT below 760 (Specification adapted from STS) This specification is an adapted upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.1 and SR 5.2.7 to be applicable when only one train of the Safe Shutdown Cooling System is required to be operable, similar to the STS provisions for the emergency core cooling system. Previously. 98 existing Specification LCO 4.2.1 required one helium circulator in each loop to be operable on its associated water turbine drive in power operation (greater than 2% of rated thermal power). The upgraded specification requires one helium circulator in only one primary coolant loop to be - operable whenever the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is less than or equal to 760°F, including operation at up to 5% of the rated reactor power. In combination with upgraded Specification LCO 3.5.1.1 as discussed above, this specification is more comprehensive than the existing specification. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.5.2 Helium Circulator Auxiliarieg - 3/4.5.2.1 Helium Circulator Auxiliaries-.CBCT above 760 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an - upgrade, combination, and simplification of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.2, LCO 4.2.3, SR 5.2.8, SR 5.2.9, SR 5.2.23, and SR 5.2.27. In comparison to the existing specifications, the upgraded specification distinguishes between the operability of the helium circulator on water turbine drive per upgraded Specification LCO 3.5.1 and the operability of the multiplicity of normally operating auxiliaries that must operate in order for the circulator to operate on either water turbine drive or steam turbine drive (FSAR Section 4.2.2.3). The upgraded specification assures the operability of both trains (Loops 1 and 2) of the helium circulator auxiliary equipment that is required for safe shutdown cooling (FSAR Sections 10.3.9 and 14.4.2.2). The specification also assures the operability of the bearing water accumulator system which is needed to prevent circulator damage during certain circulator trips and thus to facilitate restart for safe shutdown cooling if required. The specification also assures the capability of automatic water turbine startup above 30% of rated reactor power (FSAR Section 4.2.2.3.5). The water turbine auto-start is a mitigative feature for responding to the trip of both helium - circulators on steam drive during one loop operation or in the untripped - loop during two loop trouble (TSAR Sections 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 7.1.2.4, and 14.4.3) . The specification is applicable for the same plant conditions as 99 I I I I I a Specification LCO 3.5. 1.1 for operability of the helium circulator water turbine drives for safe shutdown cooling. Restoration time for any single component is 72 hours except for the bearing water accumulators which have a more restrictive 24.hour restoration time since this component is relied upon to prevent circulator damage upon trip with loss of normal bearing water. A functional analysis of this specification is provided in Section 4.4 of Reference 53. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.5.7.? Helium Circulator Auxiliaries--CBCT below 76Q (Specification adapted from STS) This specification requires an operable train of auxiliaries for the helium circulator required to be operable per Specification LCO 3.5.1.2. This equipment is the same as that for each single train addressed in Specification LCO 3.5.2.1 except that the water turbine automatic start feature is not relied upon below 30% of rated reactor power. Loss of operability of any single component requires being in at least SHUTDOWN within 12 hours. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.5.3 Steam Generators 3/4.5.3.1 Steam Generators pCT above 760 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and combination of existing Specifications LCO 4.3.1 and SR 5.3.10 with SR 5.3.11 and SR 5.3.12. The latter two existing surveillances relate to required inspections, respectively, of bimetallic welds and of steam generator tube leaks; these surveillances have been carried over into the upgrade. The existing Specification LCO 4.3.1 required both the reheater section and the:-economizer-evaporator-superheater section of each steam generator to be operable during power operation for the purpose of removing decay heat (FSAR Sections 4.3.4 and 14.4.); the current 100 a specification interprets operable as being the capability of each steam generator section to receive and dispel the flow of Safe Shutdown Cooling Water (that is, firewater) from the seismically and environmentally qualified sources (FSAR Sections 4.2.4.3.3, 10.3.9, and 14.4.2.2) . The specification requires the operability of each steam generator section when the plant is operating above 5% of rated reactor power and otherwise when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeds 760°F. With the provision of firewater after a 90-minute delay in restoring forced circulation cooling of the reactor, either EES section is capable of removing decay heat without fuel damage (that is, safe shutdown cooling) following equilibrium operation at or below 82% of rated reactor power. Under the same conditions, the reheater sections can be used for safe shutdown cooling following equilibrium operation at or below 39% of rated reactor power. The reheaters are also relied upon for responding to other transients as described in FSAR Sections 14.4 and 14.5. The restoration time for one inoperable section is 72 hours followed by 24 hours to be in at least SHUTDOWN; the restoration time for any two inoperable sections is one hour plus 24 hours to be in at least SHUTDOWN. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.5,3.2 Steam Generators--CRCT below 760 (Specification adapted from STS) This specification provides for the operability of one Safe Shutdown Cooling System train by assuring the operability of one steam generator section in the loop with an operable helium circulator when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is less than 760•F. The specification is judged to be acceptable. S/4.5.4 Fmeroencv Condensate and Fmeraencv Feedwater Headers_ 3/4.5.4.1 Emergency Condensate and Emergency Feedwator Headers--CBCT above 760 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.3.4 and SR 5.2.7. The specification requires both headers to be operable for operation above 5% of rated reactor power and otherwise when the Calculated Bulk Core 101 Temperature exceeds 760'F. This assures redundancy in the seismically and environmentally qualified flow paths from the Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply System to the helium circulator water turbine drives and the steam generator sections for effecting safe shutdown cooling (FSAR Sections 10.3.9 and 10.3.10). Above 30% of rated reactor power, the emergency feedwater header is operating so that, in combination with the auto-start feature of the water turbines, high pressure feedwater drive (and therefore high speed drive) of the helium circulators can be provided if steam drive is lost to the circulators. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,5.4.2 Emeraenev Condencj, a and Fmeraensy Feedwater Headers--CBCT below 76Q (Specification adapted from STS) This specification requires either the emergency condensate header or the emergency feedwater header to be operable to provide a single equivalent train operable for safe shutdown cooling when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is less than 760'F. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.5.5 Safe Shutdown Coolina Water Sunply System (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification upgrades and combines the Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply functions covered in existing Specifications LCO 4.2.6, SR 5.2.10, and SR 5.2.24, but deletes the fire suppression requirements of the first two existing specifications. Fire suppression requirements are included in upgraded Specification LCO/SR 3/4.7.6.1, Spray and/or Sprinkler Systems. The portions of existing Specification SR 5.2.24 that relate to equipment in other systems is also broken out into other upgraded specifications as appropriate. The Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply System is constituted of the circulating water makeup ponds and the pumps, valves, and flowpaths from the ponds to the firewater supply header that can feed the emergency condensate and emergency feedwater headers through diverse and redundant flowpaths. The upgraded specification requires the operability of two equivalent trains of Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply; the terminology 'equivalent trains" is used • 102 since there are redundant cross connections that provide flexibility in constituting a single train. The cross connections are single-failure proof (FSAR Section 10.3.10) . For plant conditions above a Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760°F, if one component of the system is inoperable, the restoration time is 72 hours. If more than one component is inoperable but if one equivalent operable train exists, the restoration time for all components is 48 hours. The existence of no operable flowpath requires restoration of at least one operable flowpath within one hour. After any restoration time is expired without the required restoration, the reactor is to be in at least SHUTDOWN within 24 hours. For plant conditions below a Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760°F, two trains are also required but 14 days is allowed for restoration of an inoperable train or the provision of a backup. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4 .6 PCRV AND CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6. 1 PCRV Pressurization 14.6, 1 . 1 PCRV Safety Valvgs (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.7 and SR 5.2.1 except that existing provisions for the PCRV penetration overpressure protection systems and the penetration minimum pressurization requirements have been broken out into separate upgrade specifications. The PCRV safety valves are an engineered safety feature described in FSAR Section 6.8. The specification is applicable whenever PCRV pressure exceeds 100 psia and requires two operable pressure relief paths, either of which can relieve PCRV overpressure prior to the PCRV reaching the safety limit reference pressure of 845 psig. 103 J Since the primary coolant is a single phase gas and not a two phase fluid, credible overpower and overheating transients are not expected to lift the PCRV safety valves. For a water ingress event to challenge the lifting of the safety valves, several levels of protection that are also subject to TS would also have to fail as described in FSAR Sections 4.3.6 and 6.8. Thus, lifting of the safety valves is not expected. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,6,1 .2 Steam Generator/Circulator Penetration Overpressure Protection (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of those portions of existing Specifications LC0 4.2.7 and SR 5.2.1 that relate to PCRV penetration overpressure protection in those PCRV penetrations that have piping with high pressure and/or high energy fluids passing through them. These penetrations include those for the steam generators (FSAR Section 5.8.2.5.4) and the helium circulators (FSAR Section 5.8.2.5.5) . The pressures of helium circulator bearing water, feedwater, superheat steam, and reheat steam can exceed PCRV reference pressure during normal operation. Leaks or partial ruptures of high pressure/high energy fluid piping in the penetration interspace are accommodated by safety valves on the penetrations to preclude overpressure challenges to the integrity of the PCRV and of the seismically qualified penetration closures. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.6.1.3 InSersoare Minimum Pressurization (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and combination of that portion of existing Specification LCO 4.2.7 that relates to PCRV penetration interspace minimum pressurization and of existing Specification 5.2.15. Penetration interspace pressurization is accomplished with clean purified helium. The specification requires penetration interspace pressure to be maintained higher than reactor coolant pressure when PCRV pressure exceeds 100 psia. An exception allowed by the specification is for the interspace pressure 104 in steam generator penetrations with known leak paths from the penetration interspace to reheat steam. For this exception, penetration interspace pressure is maintained just above cold reheat steam pressure to minimize the leakage of clean helium into the reheat steam (FSAR Section 5.8.2.5.4) . In all other penetrations, interspace pressure is held higher than reactor pressure to assure purified helium leakage into the reactor, rather than contaminated helium leakage out if the seismically qualified primary closure were to leak. Potential contaminated helium leakage into or through the steam generator penetration interspaces would be detected by the PPS radiation detectors on the reheat steam lines (LCO 3.3.1) , the non-PPS monitors on the interspaces (LCO 3.6.1.5), and the non-PPS monitor on the condenser air-ejector (Environmental LCO 8.1.1.9.7). This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.6.1 .4 PCRV Closure Leakage (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specification LCO 4.2.9 and related portions of Specifications SR 5.2. I6.a and SR 5.2. 16.b except that surveillances of instrumentation without automatic actuation functions have been deleted from the upgrade consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE as adapted for defining FSV equipment operability (Attachment 1 to Reference 2). This specification limits PCRV penetration interspace leakage of purified helium to 400 lb/day except for the steam generator reheater header leakage that is limited to 700 lb/day of purified helium. The 400 lb/day leak rate equates to a 1145 lb/hr leak through the seismically qualified primary closure with the PCRV at full pressure (688 psig) and the penetration interspace depressurized (that is, an assumed total failure of the seismically qualified secondary closure with the penetration at the same pressure as the reactor building confinement). The resulting release in this low probability situation is reported to be on the same order as the maximum credible accident (FSAR Section 14.8), which assumes a rupture in the worst location of the helium purification train. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 105 J 3/4.6. 1 .5 Steam Generator Intersoace Radiation Monitorino. (Plant specific TS) The steam generator interspace radiation monitoring section is new to the technical specifications in the TSUP. This added technical specification is to enhance detection of contaminated primary coolant helium into the primary to secondary steam generator penetration interspace when the interspace is maintained at less than primary coolant helium pressure per added technical specification 3.6.1.3.b. Technical specification 3.6.1.3.b was added to deal with a leak pathway from one or more steam generator penetration interspaces to the cold reheat steam system. These additions to the technical specifications were to accommodate potential future leak path situations similar to those experienced in 1980 (FSAR 5.8.2.5.4) from some of the interspaces to the cold reheat steam piping. This added requirement enhances the operations staff capability to detect and therefore control a potential leakage path of contaminated primary coolant helium to the reactor building plant exhaust stack to the offsite public. Normally, steam generator penetration interspace pressure is maintained above primary coolant helium pressure per technical specification 3.6.1.3.a. This is to ensure that if a primary closure leak path develops, flow will be of purified helium from the interspace through the primary closure to the primary helium system. However, in the event of one or more steam generator penetration interspaces leaking to the cold reheat steam system, maintenance of interspace pressure greater than primary coolant helium pressure increases the amount of interspace purified helium leak flow into the cold reheat steam system which degrades the condenser vacuum required for normal plant operation. Because of the difficulty of repairing such interspace to cold reheat steam system leakage paths and the associated loss of condenser vacuum, interspace pressure is allowed to be maintained less than primary coolant helium when such leaks develop. When interspace pressure is maintained less than primary coolant helium pressure but higher than the cold reheat steam system pressure, contaminated primary helium could flow through a leaking primary 106 closure into the interspace into the cold reheat steam system where eventually it is stripped by the condenser air ejector and exhausted out the reactor building exhaust stack. The introduction of and associated technical specifications for operable gross activity monitors in the steam generator interspaces provides a means of verifying primary closure leak tightness while operating with reduced steam generator penetration interspace pressure. The gross activity limit of 200 CPM, TS 3.6.1.S.b, represents a clear departure from the normal background reading of about 100 CPM. The Applicability statement is appropriate when operating with reduced steam generator penetration interspace pressure per specification 3.6.13. The Action statements require grab samples to be analyzed every 24 hours with an inoperable monitor. With an inoperable monitor beyond 7 days shutdown is required. With a reading exceeding 200 CPM confirmation of leak tightness of the affected steam generator interspace primary closures is required. The gross activity monitors are adequately routinely read, functional tested and calibrated. There is no direct comparable specification in the PWR or EWR STS. However, this interspace radiation monitoring specification does support the PCRV integrity by providing a means of detecting steam generator penetration interspace primary closure leakage when the interspace is being maintained at less than primary coolant helium pressing and with an attendant leak to the cold reheat steam system. The PCRV integrity counterpart in the PWR is the containment integrity section of STS 3/4.6.1 . The primary to interspace to cold reheat steam system leakage path is most directly comparable to a primary to secondary leak in a PWR. Thus, this Fort St. Vrain steam generator interspace radiation monitoring specification together with the condenser air ejector radiation monitor and the plant stack exhaust radiation monitor parallel the protection in a PWR, for a steam generator tube rupture incident, of secondary coolant activity monitor, air ejector radiation monitor and plant stack exhaust radiation monitor. This analogy has limited usefulness, however because of the uniqueness of the Fort St. Vrain PCRV design with its penetration interspaces and primary and secondary closures. 107 Comments on this new specification for the steam generator penetration interspace radiation monitoring were submitted to the Licensee by the NRC Staff in Reference 13. The comments were dispositioned in the NRC/PSC meetings of October 1 and 2, 1987 and October 27.30, 1987 (References 14 and IS, respectively). The Reference 13 comment on LC0 3.6.1.5.1 requesting a specific activity level in mci/CC for the gross activity monitor in lieu of just a CPM reading deserves attention. The gross activity of 200 CPM limit is permissible as opposed to a mci/CC reading since the monitors are for primary closure leak detection and not necessarily personnel onsite or public offsite dose control . The condenser air ejector exhaust radiation monitor and reactor building exhaust stack radiation monitor and radioactive gaseous effluent from the plant are addressed and controlled by Technical Specification Section 8.0, Radiological and Environmental Technical Specifications. This specification on steam generator penetration interspace radiation monitoring is just to detect that the primary closure is leaking since when it is leaking it introduces detectable noble gas activity into the interspace. Thus a CPM reading above background is permissible for this purpose. On the other hand, for radiation monitors to limit offsite public dose, absolute readings such as mCi/CC would be required since CPM readings are only relative to the instrument in use. Based on the above review, this new technical specification for the steam generator interspace radiation monitoring is judged acceptable. 14.6.2 Reactor Plant Conlina Wjter/PQRV Liner Cooling System 2/4.6.2.1 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV liner Cooling_ System--CBCT above 760 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and combination of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.13, LCO 4.2.14, SR 5.4.4, and SR 5.4.11. Consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE as adapted for FSV, the instrumentation surveillances in the latter two existing specifications have been deleted from the upgraded specifications and will be addressed in the licensee's • 108 • implementing procedures for assuring system operability (Attachment 1 to Reference SO) . This is an acceptable simplification of the level of detail addressed in the TSUP consistent with the STS treatment of instrumentation with no automatic actuation functions. — The upgraded specification requires two operable trains of the Reactor Plant Cooling Water (RPCW) and the PCRV Liner Cooling System (LCS) including redundancy in the PCRV liner cooling tubes. Every other PCRV liner cooling tube is supplied by a different (redundant) train of the RPCW/PCRV LCS. Only one train supplying half the total number of tubes on the PCRV liner is required to assure primary coolant boundary and containment integrity during the design basis accident of permanent loss of forced circulation cooling (FSAR Section 14.10.3.1 and Appendices 0. 1 .2. 1 .5, 0.2.2, and D.2.3) . A detailed functional analysis of the containment heat removal functions performed by the RPCW/PCRV LCS and assured by the upgraded TS is provided in Section 4.5 of Reference 53. In addition, operability of the RPCW/PCRV LCS is also conditional upon acceptable cooling water temperature rise in locations on the PCRV that have known hot spots. During plant operation above 5% of rated reactor power and during other plant conditions with the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeding 760°F, both trains of the RPCW/PCRV LCS are to be operating with specified tube redundancy being maintained. Loss of one train requires restoration within 48 hours and being in at least SHUTDOWN within the following 12 hours, and loss of tube redundancy for reasons other than the inoperability of a single train requires restoration of tube redundancy within 24 hours plus another 24 hours to be in SHUTDOWN if restoration is not accomplished. Loss of operability in both trains requires immediate shutdown. Increase in known PCRV liner hot spot temperatures (FSAR Section 5.9.2.8) must be compensated for within 7 days or a corrective action report submitted to NRC within 14 days. The known hot spots have significant margin to temperatures at which PCRV concrete strength would be challenged (Attachment 2 to Reference 1). The specification is judged to be acceptable. 109 3/4.6.2.2 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling Svstem--CBCT below 760 (Specification adapted from STS) The provisions of existing Specifications LCD 4.2.13 and LCO 4.2.14 required two operable • and operating trains above 2% of rated reactor power. The upgraded specifications are more comprehensive in providing for at least one operable and operating train whenever the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is less than 760'F. The specification has liberal restoration times (that is, prior to reaching a Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of _ 760'F) because of the very large thermal margins inherent in the reactor at temperatures below a core average temperature of 760'F; however, elsewhere14,49 the NRC has indicated that residual heat removal from the reactor should be actively accomplished and available either by forced circulation cooling or through the PCRV LCS under cold core conditions as demarcated by the 760°F limit. Upgraded Specification LCO 3.6.2.2 is the mechanism for assuring the continuation of an effective residual heat removal function as well as the assurance of the containment heat removal function during equivalent cold shutdown conditions at FSV. A detailed functional analysis of this specification is provided in Sections 4.3.4 and 4.5 of Reference 53. This specification is judged to be acceptable. $/4.6.3 Reactor Plant Cooling Water/PCRV Liner Cooling System Temperatures (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and combination of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.15, SR 5.4.4, and SR 5.4.5. Consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE as adapted at FSV, the instrumentation surveillances of the latter two existing specifications have been deleted from the upgraded TS and placed under the licensee's implementing procedures for assuring monitoring capability for the monitored parameters (Attachment 1 to Reference 2). The affected instrumentation has no automatic actuation function. The specification assures that LCS water and PCRV concrete temperatures are maintained within acceptable operating limits (initial conditions) as specified in FSAR Sections 5.7, 5.9, 5.12, and 9.7. This specification is judged to be acceptable. - 110 . .0 I i .I a 3/4.6.4 PCRV Integrity 3/4.6.4. 1 Structural Tnteority (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade that involves adding an LC0 and combining existing Specifications SR 5.2.2, SR 5.2.3, SR 5.2.4, and SR 5.2. 13 to address jointly PCRV tendon and concrete integrity. PCRV tendon integrity is based on meeting tendon load requirements (lift-off tests) and corrosion limits on the tendon anchor assemblies including surrounding-concrete degradation. The projected effects of tendon wire corrosion as evidenced by failed wires are compared against the actual test results for meeting tendon load requirements using the remaining available steel cross-sectional area when failed tendon wires are accounted for as the basis for comparison. Evaluations and reporting of results to the NRC are required annually. Structural integrity of PCRV concrete (other than visual examination in the vicinity of tendon anchor assemblies) is demonstrated through surveillance of deformations and deflections, helium permeability tests on PCRV-installed test configurations, crack mapping, and other periodic visual examinations for evidence of deterioration. FSAR Sections 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.12, and 5. 13 provide detailed technical bases for the PCRV structural integrity determination. This specification is judged to be acceptable for assuring PCRV, and therefore containment, structural integrity. 3/4. 6.4.? liner (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade that consists of adding an LCO and combining existing Specifications SR 5.2.5 and SR 5.2.14 for surveillance of irradiation and corrosion effects. FSAR Section 5.2, 5.7, 5.8, and 5.13 provide the technical bases for the specification limits. This specification is judged to be acceptable. Evidence of the continued integrity of the liner insulation and thermal barriers is assured by upgraded Specifications LCO 3.6.2 and LCO 3.6.3 that have been discussed above. 3/4.6.4.3 Penetrations. Wells. and isolation Valves (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an 111 6 upgrade that consists of adding an LCO and combining existing Specifications SR 5.2.28 with SR 5.2.16.a through SR 5.2.16.9 and SR 5.2.24,h. Consistent with the STS definition of OPERABLE as adapted for defining operability of FSV equipment, surveillances on instrumentation, except for instrumentation used to actuate an automatic isolation function, have been deleted from the upgraded TS and are to be addressed in the implementing procedures (Attachment 1 to Reference 2) . This specification addresses (1) containment integrity as provided by the structural and mechanical integrity of the PCRV penetrations and wells. and (2) confinement integrity as provided by automatic isolation valves in the respective purified helium and cooling water supply lines to and discharge lines from the penetrations, the PCRV LCS and the purification cooling water system. Potential leaks paths through the PCRV via the purified helium or the LCS cooling water lines could compromise confinement integrity in an accident condition and are thus protected by automatic isolation valves. The bases for the surveillances of the subject components are described in FSAR Sections 5.3, S.8, 5.9, 5.12, 5. 13, 9.4, and 9.7. The specifications are judged to be acceptable. 3/4.6.5 Reactor Building Confinement 2/4,6.S.1 Reactor Building Confinement Integrity. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Reactor Building Confinement Integrity TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LCO 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.1. The conversion of the existing Specifications LCO 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.1 was substantially improved by dividing it into its three TSUP sections according to the main topics of reactor building confinement integrity, reactor building exhaust system, and reactor building over-pressure protection system. After segregating out this present reactor building confinement integrity section 3/4.6.5.1 in the TSUP, it became more directly comparable to the boiling water reactor STS84 Section 3/4.6.5.1, Secondary Containment Integrity. The FSV combination of the primary containment function of the PCRV and the secondary containment function of the reactor building is more similar to the BWR drywell primary containment and reactor building 112 i secondary containment than to the PWR single containment building. At FSV the PCRV is the primary containment during normal reactor operation. The FSV reactor building is a secondary containment or backup to the PCRV in the advent of fission product releases from the PCRV during accidents. Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Reactor Building Confinement Integrity Section in the specification, action statements, and surveillances. The specification was upgraded by adding a definition for reactor building confinement integrity which requires the reactor building louvers closed and the truck bay access to be closed (either the exterior doors or the interior door/hatches to be closed) , One existing specification, 4.5.I.(a).1, personnel access to the building controlled, was deleted and is not a TS requirement of the STS. Maintenance of the FSV reactor building at subatmospheric pressure, TSUP Section 3/4.6.5.2, provides adequate internal pressure control without the need for specifying one of the detailed aspects of control , personnel access. The added Action statements for critical operation, shutdown, and refueling are comparable to the BWR STS action statements. The added 32 day surveillances are also comparable to the STS similar requirements for verifying closure of louvers, doors, and hatches. The TSUP specifications for the reactor building confinement integrity properly reflect FSAR requirements. FSAR Sections 6.2.2, 14.8, 14.10.3.4, and 14.12 require reactor building confinement integrity to ensure that the hypothetical calculated fission product releases during all credible accidents including the maximum credible accident (MCA) and that of Design Basis Accident No. 1 (DBA-1) are filtered and exhausted from the reactor building stack. The FSAR calculated offsite dose consequences for these class of accidents assumed that the fission product releases would be through the reactor building exhaust filters and out the reactor building vent stack. In order to ensure that all potential fission product releases are through the filters • and stack, the reactor building doors, hatches, and louvers must be closed. In FSAR Section 6.2.4.1, it is demonstrated that the offsite doses are not very sensitive to the reactor building leak rate up to a 113 range of 4500%/day at 1/2 inch water gauge pressure. Therefore, no reactor building leakrate specification is necessary in the technical specifications. For DBA-2, rapid depressurization blowdown, FSAR Section 10. 11 .2.7 states that all fission product releases are assumed to be unfiltered releases at ground level and, therefore, do not take credit for reactor building integrity. Even with this assumption, the offsite accident duration doses for 08A-2 are far below those of 10 CFR 100. 3/4.6.5.2 Reactor Building Exhaust System. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Reactor Building Exhaust System TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LC0 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.3. As noted in the previous section of this report, the conversion of the existing Specifications LC0 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.3 was substantially improved by dividing it into its main topics of reactor building confinement integrity, reactor building exhaust system, and reactor building overpressure protection system. The present reactor building exhaust system Section 3/4.6.5.2 in the TSUP does not have a directly comparable Section in the STS. Neither the BWR or PWR STS have specifications on the reactor building exhaust system. At FSV the reactor building exhaust system is recognized as an engineered safety feature system because of credit being taken for it in the FSAR for all credible accidents and the DBA No. 1 potential fission product releases (see FSAR Sections 6.2.2, 14.8, 14.10.3.4, and 14.12). Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Reactor Building Exhaust System Section in the specification and action statements. The specification was upgraded by requiring two of the three exhaust trains (both fan and filter assembly) to be operable versus the existing TS requirement of just operability of two of the three exhaust fans. The added action statements for critical operation, shutdown and refueling are comparable to STS safety system actions. For example, many of the STS containment safety subsystems can be inoperable up to 7 days before requiring shutdown. The surveillances have been changed to be more comparable to similar STS requirements. A 12 hour frequency check was added for verifying that reactor building internal pressure is 114 subatmospheric. The testing of the exhaust filters was clarified and in some instances reduced, for example, 18 month in the the TSUP versus annual checks in the existing TS, to agree with that done in the STS (see, for example, STS SR 4.6.3 on PWR containment iodine cleanup system filters) . The TSUP specifications for the reactor building exhaust system properly reflect FSAR requirements. FSAR Sections 6.2.2, 14.8, 14. 10.3.4, and 4. 12 require that the reactor building exhaust system filter and vent any released fission products during all credible accidents including the MCA and that of DBA-1. The FSAR calculated offsite dose consequences for these class of accidents assumed that the fission product releases would be through the reactor building exhaust filters and out the reactor building vent stack. The specified methyl iodine penetration of less than 10% is consistent with the removal efficiency assumed in the FSAR accident analysis (FSAR Section 14.12.3) . The check of charcoal adsorbers after 4400 hours of operation is consistent with FSAR Section 6.2.3.2.3. The 1% bypass leakage is consistent with the STS approach (see STS SR 4.6.3) of using 1% when the charcoal efficiency is assumed less than 95%. Testing after structural maintenance, fire, chemical release, or painting is consistent with FSAR Section 6.2.3.2.3. 3/4.6.5.3 Reactor Building Overpressure Protection System. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Reactor 8uilding Overpressure Protection System TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from existing Specifications LCO 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.2. As noted in the two previous sections, the conversion of the existing Specifications LCO 4.5.1 and SR 5.5.2 was substantially improved by dividing it into its three main topics of reactor building confinement integrity, reactor building exhaust system, and reactor building overpressure protection system. This present reactor building overpressure protection system section supports together with the reactor building confinement integrity and the reactor building exhaust system sections the control of potential fission product releases during routine operation and hypothetical 1I5 accident conditions. As indicated the FSAR assumes fission products release' from PCRV during hypothetical accidents, except for DBA-2, will be through the reactor building exhaust system filters and out the vent stack. The louvers must open to protect the reactor building design pressure of 10 inches of water gauge, so that any released fission products will be released in a controlled manner. Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Reactor Building Overpressure Protection System Section in the specification, action statements, and surveillances. The specification was clarified by identifying that at least 70 of 94 louver panels shall be operable and by placing their actuation setpoint in the surveillances. The applicability was clarified and extended to cover low power and startup as well as power operation. An action statement was added for restoration of inoperability within 7 days or shutdown within the next 24 hours. This action is comparable to STS safety system actions. For example, many of the STS containment safety subsystems can be inoperable up to 7 days before requiring shutdown. The surveillances have been clarified and changed to be more comparable to similar STS requirements. Exercising each louver group quarterly was clarified to be through "an open-closed cycle". The list of detailed prerequisites for louver testing was deleted as this level of detail is more appropriate for the surveillance test procedure itself. The test requirement was clarified from functionally testing monthly and calibrating the differential pressure switches to an 18 month simulation of an overpressurization signal and verifying that the louvers open by a pressure signal of least 3 inches water gauge and close when pressure drops below 2 inches water gauge. Also, an 18 month verification of at least 1800 psig in the nitrogen backup supply was added. The TSUP specifications for the reactor building overpressure protection system properly reflect FSAR requirements. As in the two previous sections, FSAR Sections 6.2.2, 14.8, 14.10.3.4, and 4.12 require that the reactor building overpressure protection system be operable to ensure building integrity. The open close setpoints of 3 116 di. inches and 2 inches water gauge, respectively, are as required by FSAR Section 6.2.3.4. The louver overpressure protection system is only required so that the reactor building integrity is not challenged or degraded by accidents such as HELBs or OBA-2. 3/4.7 PLANT and SAFE SHUTDOWN COOLING SUPPORT SVSTEM1 3/4.7. 1 Turbine Cycle 3/4.7.1 . 1 Boiler Feed Pumn1 (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and combination of existing Specifications LCO 4.3.2 and SR 5.2.7. As with the existing TS, the upgraded TS is based on maintaining redundant capability in the boiler feed pumps to supply high pressure feedwater for helium circulator water turbine drive and steam generator cooling in the event of a reactor depressurization accident that could be accompanied by the simultaneous loss of reactor-generated steam. A detailed functional analysis of the upgraded TS is provided in Sections 4.1 and 4.3.3 of Reference 53, and the - redundancy requirements for helium circulators on feedwater drive are supported by the evaluation in Reference 85. During power operation above 337. of rated reactor power, both steam-driven boiler feed pumps (33% capacity each) are normally in operation to provide normal feedwater supply to the steam generators. Above 30% of rated reactor power, one of the steam-driven feed pumps is used to maintain water supply to and pressure in the emergency feedwater header. Upon loss of steam drive to the helium circulators during either one loop operation (FSAR Sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2) or a two loop trouble event (FSAR Section 7.1.2.4) , the emergency feedwater header is used to automatically supply the helium circulator water turbine drives upon actuation of the automatic start function that is required to be active per upgraded Specification LCO 3.5.2.1. Above 65% of rated reactor power, the fixed-speed electric-motor-driven feed pump is placed in operation. The turbine-driven boiler feed pumps are used for normal startup and shutdown maneuvers because of their speed control capability whereas the 117 • motor-driven pump is maintained in operable standby during such maneuvers because its fixed-speed chavacteristics make it difficult to control by use of the throttle valve and bypass throttle valve; however, the motor-driven pump can be used to execute its important-to-safety function and this is demonstrated periodically by surveillance. The electric power requirements for the motor-driven pump exceed the capability of the on-site diesel generators. Therefore, the motor-driven feed pump requires off-site power; whereas the two turbine driven feedpumps can be operated using steam from the reactor or from either the auxiliary boiler or the backup auxiliary boiler that are diesel-fired. For purposes of accommodating long-term cooling without fuel damage following reactor shutdown in the depressurization accident, two helium circulators are required to be operating within 60 minutes of a rapid depressurization accident (RDA) as described in FSAR Sections 4.3.3 and 14. 11.2.2, and at least one helium circulator is assumed to operate continuously in the case of the maximum expected depressurization rate (FSAR Sections 4.3.3, 14.4.3.2 [Case C2], and 14.8) . In both cases of the rapid and slow depressurization accidents, condensate is assumed to be available with or without offsite power since the small (12 1/2% capacity) condensate pumps can be powered off the emergency diesel generators. Part of the condensate can also be routed to either section of either steam generator via the emergency condensate header during a depressurization accident so that feedwater may be supplied only to the circulator drives if required. As discussed in Reference 85, a slow depressurization accident may have the equivalent or nearly equivalent effect as the RDA if the primary coolant leak from the PCRV actuates the Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System (SLRDIS) and the operators have to expend time to restore primary and secondary coolant flow that is isolated by SLRDIS. The actuation of SLRDIS precludes long-term adverse environmental conditions within the reactor building due to rupture of high energy fluid piping and thus contributes to the success path for restoring forced cooling in the event that a reactor depressurization PCRV occurs due to a penetration failure in which a high energy fluid line also fails. Reference 85 also demonstrates that the RDA following equilibrium 118 J operation at 82,eof of rated reactor power can be accommodated with the operation of one train of the seismically and environmentally qualified Safe Shutdown Cooling System with a 60-minute delay in startup and leading to only about I% of fuel damage in the worst case. As discussed in Reference 85, the offsite doses would be less than the 10CFR Part 100 guidelines for this case. The upgraded TS requires that both the motor-driven feed putp and one of the two steam turbine-driven feed pumps be operable to provide diversity and redundancy or, if the motor-driven feed pump is inoperable, that both steam turbine-driven feed pumps be operable to provide redundancy with one of the auxiliary boilers operable to provide assured diversity in steam supply within 60 minutes of the onset of a RDA (FSAR Section 14.11.2.2) . To satisfy requirements stemming from the recent environmental qualification of FSV per 1OCFR Part 50.49, the auxiliary boilers are no longer allowed to be operating on intermittent firing (FSAR Sections 6.3 and 10.2.6) when reactor power exceeds 65% of rated and the motor-driven feed pump is operating but not classified as operable per this specification. Operability of the feed pumps is to be demonstrated at least once per refueling cycle by operation of two helium circulators at 8000 rpm on feedwater supply through the emergency feedwater header from each pump. The specification is applicable whenever the reactor is operating above 5% of rated reactor power and otherwise when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeds 760'F. As discussed in Reference 53, this requirement is judged to be conservative for equilibrium operation below 35% of rated reactor power because the PCRV LCS can accommodate the pressurized core heatup event with little or no fuel damage (FSAR Appendix 0.4) . This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,7. 1.2 Steam/Water Qump System. (Plant specific TS) Specification 3/4.7.12 on the steam water dump system is essentially new with a small carryover from existing Specifications ICO 4.3.3 and SR 5.3.I. It is included here under this plant specific category because 119 the specifications involved significant NRC Staff concerns that required Licensee resolution. The steam water dump system is an Engineered Safeguard System (FSAR 6.4) unique to Fort St. Vrain and has no parallel in The PWR or BWR STS. The system purpose is to dump the contents of a steam generator on indication of high moisture level in the primary coolant helium. Since the secondary system is at much higher pressure than the primary system, any steam generator tube leak/rupture causes water steam leakage into the primary coolant system. Dumping the steam generator economizer-evaporator-superheater contents reduces the amount of steam water inventory available for ingress into the primary coolant system. The initiating signals from high reactor moisture level and or high reactor pressure are part of the plant protection system and are treated in Technical Specifications 2.2.1, Limiting Safety System Settings Trip Setpoints, and 3.3.1, Plant Protective System Limiting Condition for Operation. The steam water dump system is required to minimize core damage from the steam-graphite reaction for a steam generator tube rupture event. The existing specification 4.3.3/5.3.1 only covered water level in the dump tank and testing of the steam water dump valves. The TSUP specification 3.7.12 was significantly expanded to require operability of the major components of the system, namely, the steam/water dump valves, water level in the dump tank, the steam/water dump tank safety valves, the steam/water dump tank block valves, the feedwater isolation and control valves, and the interlock between Loop 1 and Loop 2 to prevent simultaneous dumping of both loops. The safety significance of the system is to limit the amount of water ingress into the primary coolant system by quickly dumping the steam generator contents to the dump tank upon signal initiation. The feedwater isolation and control valves must be operable per LCO 3.7.1.2.f and must close per the closing time of SR 4.7.1.2.C.2. The block valves must be open per LOC 3.7.1.2.d and the dump valves must open (LCO 3.7.1.2.b) in order for the system to successfully perform its function of dumping to the dump tank upon signal initiation. The water level specification LCO 3.7.1.2.a and safety valves operability, LCO 3.7.1.2.c, are more related to equipment protection 120 concerns and controlled containment of any radioactive fluids in the dump tank. The function of the interlock is to prevent simultaneous dump of both loops so that primary system cooldown, is still available with one steam generator. The specifications of Section 3.7.] .2 adequately address these operability and associated surveillance requirements. PCRV overpressurization control is not a primary requirement of this system, FSAR 6.4.1, at failure of the dump system results in a PCRV pressure 75 psi below the Reference Pressure of 845 psig. PCRV overpressurization is positively prevented by the PCRV safety valves, see TSUP Section 3/4.6.1.1. Several NRC Staff concerns with the steam/water dump system technical specifications were transmitted to the Licensee in the NRC letter dated May 30, 1985.13 The NRC Staff recommended that the steam/water dump tank safety valves have a lower as well as an upper limit on the setpoint to ensure that hot liquids dumped to the tank which might contain low level radioactivity would not inadvertently be released to atmosphere by a low setpoint on the safety valves. The Licensee in their May 27, 19881 submittal resolved this concern by providing a lower setpoint limit of 850 psig. The NRC Staff also recommended that the Licensee consider applicability to the Startup mode as well as to the Power and Low Power Modes. Again the Licensee's letters of May 27, 19881 and June 14, 19882 resolved this issue. The Licensee indicated that the average temperature of 500°F during startup is far below the temperature (>900°F) at which there is any significant steam-graphite reaction. Also, the Licensee stated that potential accidents initiated from the startup mode do not result in high temperatures because of the low temperature excursions and the high heat capacity of the core. Under worst case assumptions, FSAR Section 14.2.2.7 indicates that for a maximum worth control rod pair withdrawal at source power, the average fuel temperature increases by about 540°C (972*F) but does so for only a few minutes. In FSAR Appendix A.12, Figure A-12-1 shows that below about 900°F the graphite oxidation rate would be insignificant. Therefore, because of the small residence time at 121 any expected elevated temperatures during either startup or accidents iniliated in startup, graphite oxidation would be insignificant and so the steam water dump applicability is not required. The other NRC Staff concerns were dispositioned in the NRC/PSC meetings of October 1-2, 1987, Reference 14, and October 27-30, 1987. Reference 15 and in the supplemental safety analysis/justification letter of June 14, 19882. Based on the above review, the Technical Specifications of Section 3.7. 1 .2 on the steam/water dump system are judged acceptable. 3/4.7. 1.3 Pressure Relief Valves (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specification SR 5.3.3 to which has been added an LCO for those valves that are not used normally and are relied upon to accommodate anticipated transients as described in the FSAR. Consistent with the STS, normally-used steam bypass valves (FSAR Sections 10.1.1, 10.1.3, 10.2.5.1, and 10.2.5.3) have been deleted from the specification, and the main steam power-operated pressure relief valves (FSAR Section 10.2.5.3) have also been deleted since these valves are not relied upon in any FSAR accident analysis. The reheat steam power-operated pressure relief valves (FSAR figure 10.1-1) that are addressed in the upgraded TS are relied upon to accommodate loss-of-offsite power transients as described in FSAR Sections 10.3.1 and 10.3.2. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 2/4.7.1 .4 Secondary Coolant Activity. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Secondary Coolant Activity TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LCO 4.3.8 and SR 5.3.7. The specification was significantly upgraded and made comparable to STS Section 3.7.1.4, Specific Activity. The specification applicability was clarified by designating Power, Low Power, and Startup as the applicable modes. An action was added to require power reduction in 12 hours and then shutdown within the next 12 hours if the 0.009µCi/CC of I-131 or 6.8µCi/CC of tritium specifications are 122 exceeded. This reduction in power would decrease any activity transfer from the primary system to the secondary system in say the steam generator reheater section and would reduce the risk of secondary system pipe rupture or vent to the atmosphere. The surveillance was improved by switching to a 24 hour surveillance from a 7 day surveillance when 10% of the specified limit is reached versus the 25% of limit of the current specification. The change from 7 days to 24 hours on surveillance if the activity increases by more than 25% above the previous activity for the same power level , was deleted. This deletion was judged acceptable as there is no such requirement in the STS and the 7 day and 24 hour frequencies based on getting 10% of the specified limits is much more conservative than the respective STS frequencies of 6 months and 31 days. The specifications for the secondary coolant activity properly reflect the FSAR requirements. The STS secondary coolant activity limit, Section 3.7. 1.4, is based on keeping the offsite dose well below 10 CFR 100 limits in the event of a steam line rupture with a coincident 1 GPM primary-to-secondary tube leak in the steam generator. The secondary coolant activity limits at FSV have been set more conservatively based on venting 52000 gallons to the atmosphere of reheat steam through the power operated relief valve during an incident involving loss of offsite power, main turbine trip, and failure of one emergency diesel generator to start (FSAR Sections 10.3.2, and 14.5). Accidents involving secondary coolant leakage from HELBs are addressed in FSAR Sections 14.5.1 and the offsite doses are shown in FSAR Tables 14.5-6 and 14.5-7. These HELB related thyroid doses are in the millirem range compared to 1.5 Rem to the thyroid calculated for the 52,000 gallon release.86 3/4.7,1.5 Safety Valves--0peratinq (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification2 is a clarifying upgrade of existing Specification SR 5.3.9 to which has been added an LC0. Consistent with the STS, surveillance requirements have been modified to reflect ASME code requirements. A safety valve on each steam generator superheater section outlet is required to be operable for each operating 123 boiler feed pump; so all three superheater safety valves must be operable when the three feed pumps are in operation. The single low-pressure safety valve on each steam generator reheater section outlet is required to be operable at any time that fission heat is being generated. A restoration time of 72 hours is allowed for an inoperable valve. Power crPration is allowed to continue at or below about 66% of rated for an inoperable superheater safety valve and at or below about 33% for two inoperable superheater safety valves on an operating steam generator. A reheater safety valve, which has no redundancy, must be restored or the reactor shut down. A brief functional analysis of this specification in comparison to STS requirements is provided in Section 4.8 of Reference 53. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.7.1 .6 Safety Valves--Shutdown (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification2 is a clarifying upgrade of existing Specification SR 5.3.9 to which has been added an LCO. One operable safety valve is required for each operating section of the steam generator. A brief functional analysis is provided in Section 4.8 of Reference 53. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,7. 1 .7 Condensate Pumps, (Specification adapted from STS) There are four condensate pumps at FSV. Two are 60% capacity; two are 12 1/2% capacity. Only the small pumps are addressed in the TS upgrade. The large condensate pumps require electrical power rpm the main generator or offsite power and can only draw water from the condenser hot well . The small (12 1/2% capacity) condensate pumps can be aligned to obtain water from the condenser hot well , the two condensate storage tanks, the (helium circulator) turbine water drain tank via the hot well , or the decay heat removal exchanger and can provide flow directly to either the main condensate line or the emergency condensate header. The large pumps can also provide flow to the emergency condensate header but through a more circuitous route than that of the small pumps. The small condensate pumps are an automatically sequenced essential load of the emergency diesel generators. The small condensate pumps are relied upon during loss of offsite power with main turbine-generator trip to provide 124 either condensate flow and net positive suction head for at least one turbine-driven boiler feed pump operating on reactor-generated steam (FSAR Sections 10.3. 1 , 14,3.6.5, and 14.4.2) or both direct steam generator cooling and helium circulator water turbine drive via the emergency condensate header (FSAR Sections 10.3.2, 14.3.6.6, and 14.4.2.1 [Case BI; ) . Only one small condensate pump is required to be operable above 5% power since the Safe Shutdown Cooling System provides an environmentally and seismically qualified alternate success path. The role of the condensate pumps is addressed functionally in Reference 53. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4, 7.2 Hydraulic Power System. (Specification having additional safety analysis/justification) Although this TSUP Section 3. 7.2, Hydraulic Power System, is a carryover from the existing Specifications LCO 4.3.7 and SR 5.3.5, the Licensee submitted additional safety analysis/specific justification in response to the first three comments of the NRC Staff (see Table 2.2.4.1) . In action statement a, on loss of both hydraulic accumulators or loss of 2500 psig, the affected secondary coolant loop is isolated within 1 hour and the reactor is shutdown within 24 hours. The existing TS required shutdown either immediately or within 1 hour. The reactor was shutdown immediately or within 1 hour because, previously on loss of hydraulic power, the nonaffected secondary coolant loop was isolated (since it still had hydraulic power) . But this left the affected loop for cooldown and, therefore, required the quick shutdown. Per the specific justification provided, PSC now has installed motor operated and manual valves in the emergency feedwater/condensate system that permit isolation of the affected secondary coolant loop. Shutdown and cooldown with the nonaffected secondary coolant loop can now be done, thus removing the urgency for a quick shutdown. This change also provides the justification from changing from isolating the nonaffected secondary coolant loop in the • existing TS to isolating the affected secondary coolant loop in the TSUP. 125 PSC also deleted the requirement for the functional and calibration tests on the pressure indicators and low pressure alarms on the hydraulic oil accumulators pressurizing gas. As PSC did provide a surveillance of pressure and of oil temperature, this is consistent with the STS philosophy of only requiring functional tests and calibrations in the TSs of those instrument systems so designated in STS TS Section 3/4.3, Instrumentation. valve operating systems, such as air, hydraulic oil , etc. are not in that instrumentation grouping. Of course, such functional and calibration tests do exist at FSV and they support the operability definition of the serviced major system, in this case the secondary coolant system. eased upon the review of the specific justification provided for the hydraulic power system and the conversion from the existing TSs to the STS format, TSUP Section 3.7.2 is judged acceptable. 3/4.7.3 Instrument Air System. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Instrument Air System TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LCO 4.3.6 and SR 5.3.6. The Instrument Air System has no comparable in the STS although PWRs have essential instrument air systems which are used for safety related equipment operation (see Regulatory Guide 1.70, Section 9.3.187 or the SRP54, Section 9.3.1, Compressed Air System). Therefore, although not required in the STS, the Instrument Air System has been specified in the existing FSV TS and the TSUP. Significant improvements were made in the TSUP to the Instrument Air System Section in the specification, action statements, and surveillances. The specification was clarified to clearly delineate the component of each system and by stating applicability to the Power, Low Power, and Startup modes. The Instrument Air System applicability is not required by the TSUP in the Shutdown or Refueling modes even though Safe Shutdown Cooling System equipment and the Reserve Shutdown System depend on it for their operation in these modes (See FSAR Sections 10.3.9 and 3.8.3.2). The Instrument Air System is itself specified as required for safe shutdown of the plant in FSAR Table 1.4-2, "List of Structures, Systems and Components Required for a Safe Shutdown 126 • i I I I I i Ii ■ of the Plant, " Also, a Service Water System flow path to the instrument air compressors and after coolers is required by TSUP specification 2.7.4. 1.5 with applicability in the Shutdown and Refueling modes. Thus, there appears to be adequate basis to require applicability of the Instrument Air System to the Refueling and Shutdown modes. In spite of this, such applicability was not demanded, based on the logic inherent in the STS, namely that without instrument air when needed, the systems so effected are themselves declared inoperable. An Action statement was added to require restoration of an inoperable system within 72 hours or shutdown within the next 24 hours. A surveillance was added to check for 85 prig pressure in the air receivers every 24 hours. The monthly functional test and annual calibration were deleted consistent with the STS philosophy and as explained in the licensee's letter of June 14, 19882 on justification for significant relaxations or deletions from the current specifications, (see, for example, LCO 3.7.1.2-5 or 3.7.2-3 Discussion) , instrumentation or equipment not required for monitoring core performance or initiating automatic protective actions does not have functional or calibration testing specified in the technical specifications. A functional test at 18 month intervals was added to include a simulated loss of header pressure and verification of automatic air compressor start and alarm function. These technical specifications on the Instrument Air System although not entirely representative of the implied FSAR requirements for applicability in the Shutdown and Refueling mode, are judged adequate. Again, this acceptance is based on the TSUP exceeding the requirements of the STS approach of not requiring any specifications on the Instrument Air System. FSAR Sections 9.9, 3.8.3.2, 10.3.9 and Table 1.4-2 describe the Instrument Air System and its support for the Safe Shutdown Cooling System and the Reserve Shutdown System. It is judged that the FSV Instrument Air System does not perform any safety related functions of more consequence than the safety related compressed air system in the PWRs and so does not need any more elevated consideration in the TSs as compared to its lack of specification in the STS. 127 3/4.7,4 Service Water System 3/4,7.4. 1 Service Water System--Operating (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade, combination, and expansion of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.4 and SR 5.2.24.e. The upgraded TS addresses not only the redundant service water pumps that were covered in the existing TS, but also the pump inlet supply flow paths from the circulating water makeup system and the pump outlet supply flow paths to essential service water users. The action statements also account for providing backup capability from the diverse and redundant seismically qualified firewater system. All service water components that are addressed in the existing and upgraded TS for the service water system are seismically qualified, Class I components. With the exception of certain nonseismically qualified safety-related equipment (service water cooling tower fans and return pumps) that is part of the Alternate Cooling Method (ACM) and is surveilled per upgraded Specification SR 4.8.4.e.2 and Table 4.8.4-2, the non-Class I portions of the normal service water system are not addressed in the TS. When the reactor is operating above 5% of rated reactor power or otherwise when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeds 760-f, two of the three service water pumps must be operable, and each flowpath must be operable or have a backup flow path operable within 72 hours. A brief functional analysis is provided in Section 4.6.3 of Reference 53. The functional analysis addresses the functions of both the Class I and non-Class I configurations of the service water system. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.7.4.? Service Water Svctem--Shutdgg4 (Specification adapted from STS) Although there is no equivalent specification in the STS for service water under equivalent (cold) shutdown conditions, the FSV service water system is the Class I primary success path for assuring PCRV cooling during shutdown with firewater backup as the alternate Class I success path. Also normally, below 5% fission power when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature is less than 760°F, service water is the heat sink for residual heat removal through the PCRV LCS. One pump with 128 operable flow paths is required to be operable. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4.7.5 Primary Coolant Depressurization (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade and expansion of existing Specifications LCO 4.2.12, LCO 4.2.18, and SR 5.2.24.g. The specification requires that two operable flow paths for reactor depressurization and primary coolant filtration be available through the Helium Purification System (HPS) to accommodate the permanent loss of forced cooling accident (FSAR Sections 9.4.3.3.2, 9.6.6, 9.7.3.4, and 14. 10.2 and Appendix 0.1). The HPS normally operates to maintain (1) primary coolant radioactivity within the limits of upgraded Specification LCO 3.4.2 and (2) primary coolant impurities within the limits of upgraded Specifications LCD 3.4.3 or LCO 3.4.4. During the loss of forced cooling accident, the HPS also provides for a filtered depressurization within the time allowed and under the conditions specified in upgrade Specifications LCO 3.2.4 and LCO 3.4. 1. The filtered depressurization mitigates the dose consequences of the permanent loss of forced cooling accident (FSAR Section 14.10 and Appendix D) by (1) removing circulating activity that existed in the primary coolant before the accident, (2) eliminating the pressure differential that could drive released fission products out of the PCRV if a leak developed in the pressurized PCRV after core heatup and fuel damage had occurred as a result of the accident, and (3) eliminating convective heat transfer as a source of potentially excessive and damaging heat loads on the upper PCRV thermal barrier and liner during the core heatup event. The upgraded specification provides for two operable trains of the HPS whenever the core is generating fission heat or otherwise when the Calculated Bulk Core Temperature exceeds 760°F. This is conservative for accidents initiated below an equilibrium power level of 35% of rated reactor power because recent analysis (FSAR Appendix 0.4) has shown that very little fuel damage occurs for the permanent loss of forced cooling under this condition even if the PCRV remains pressurized. The specification is judged to be acceptable. 129 3/4.7.6 Fire Suooression Systems 3/4.7.6. 1 Sorav and/or Sprinkler Systems (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LCO 4.10.5 and SR 5.10.6 and includes an updated complete listing of areas serviced by the spray/sprinkler systems consistent with FSAR Section 9.12 (Revision 5) . Operability requirements have been expanded to apply at all times instead of merely during power operation as provided in the existing TS. The upgraded TS does not require special reports as an action as provided in STS LCO/SR 3/4.7.11.2 for sprinkler/spray component inoperabilities, but a continuous fire watch with backup equipment is required for sprinkler/spray inoperabilities in areas containing safety-related equipment. If an evaluation determines that no safety-related equipment is affected by the inoperability, no fire watch is required. If redundant equipment is not also affected based on evaluation, an hourly fire watch is permitted. STS requirements have been adapted for the upgraded surveillances. The assurance of firewater supply to the spray/sprinkler system is addressed in upgraded Specification LCO 3.5.5, Safe Shutdown Cooling Water Supply System, because of the redundant roles of firewater as the Class I source for emergency forced circulation cooling of the reactor, for PCRV (containment) heat removal and for backup service water for cooling of essential equipment such as the emergency diesel generators. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 3/4,7,¢,,2 Carbon Dioxide Systems. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Carbon Dioxide System section for the emergency diesel generator rooms of the existing Specifications LCO 4.10.6 and SR 5.10.7 was carried over but was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Section 3.7.11.3. One relaxation was the deletion of considering the emergency diesel generators if the carbon dioxide system was inoperable beyond 30 days. This relaxation was judged acceptable as no such requirement exists in the STS and there is no FSV site specific reason for such a requirement. This Carbon Dioxide System TS is consistent with the FSV FSAR Sections 9.12.2, 9.12.3, and 9.12.6. 130 3/4.7.6.3 Halon Systems. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Halon System TSUP Section is acceptable and was carried over from the existing Specifications LCO 4.10.1/4.10.2 and SR 5. 10. 1/5. 10.2. The conversion of the existing Specifications LCO 4. 10. 1/4.10.2 and SR 5.10.1/5.10.2 into the TSUP were substantially improved and made comparable to the STS Section 3.7.11.4, Halon Systems. The specification itself was expanded to include coverage of the Building 10 switchgear room, ground level, and battery room and was clarified by segregating the required action. The applicability was expanded to all times rather than just during power operation. The Action to shutdown in 72 hours with an inoperable system was deleted and an action comparable to that in the STS was added; namely, to establish a fire watch within one hour with backup fire suppression equipment. The Licensee stated that there was no special situation requiring FSV to be more restrictive than the STS approach regarding an inoperable halon system.2 The surveillance was upgraded by addition of a check for pressure in the halon bottles once per 31 days. Surveillances were added to check weight and pressure in the halon bottles supplying the Building 10 areas on a quarterly frequency. Checking for weight and pressure for the halon bottles supplying the three room control complex was relaxed from quarterly to semiannually. This relaxation of the frequency check for weight and pressure was accepted because of the difficulty involved in removing the bottles to do the check. The Licensee also had their Fire Protection Plan including halon bottle weight and pressure checks developed through discussions with the NRC Staff and recommended29 that any further changes regarding weight verification be addressed through the Fire Protection Program. This position was judged acceptable especially in light of the effort under the TSIP to remove the fire protection material from the technical specifications. The frequency for the annual test of the HVAC isolation dampers, response to a simulated signal , and verifying that the distribution headers and nozzles are not blocked was changed2 to 18 months consistent with the STS. These specifications for the Halon System properly reflect the FSAR Section 9.12.2.3, 9.12.3.3, and 9.12.6 requirements and those of the existing TS as well as the comparable STS requirements. 131 3/4.7,6.4 Fire Hose Stations. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Fire Hose Stations section of the existing Specifications LC0 4. 10.7 and SR 5.10.8 was carried over but was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Section 3.7, 11 .5. Significant upgrades were Applicability to all times, the detailed Action statements for inoperable stations, and the 31 day visual inspections, 18 month inspections, and 3 year valve tests. This Fire Hose Station TS is consistent with FSAR Sections 9. 12.2, 9.12.3, and 9. 12.6. 3/4.7.6.5 Yard Fire Hydrants and Hydrant Hose Houses. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Yard Fire Hydrants Section of the existing Specifications LC0 4.10.8 and SR 5.10.9 was carried over and was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Section 3.7.11.6. Significant upgrades were applicability to all times and the one hour and 24 hour action times to locate additional equivalent capacity hose in an adjacent operable hydrant hose house for those inoperable yard hydrants that are the primary and not the primary means of fire protection, respectively. This Yard Fire Hydrants TS section is consistent with FSAR Section 12.9.6. 3/4,7.7 Fire Rated Barriers (Specification carryover from existing TS) This specification is an upgrade of existing Specifications LC0 4. 10.4 and SR 5.10.4 to more closely resemble STS LCO/SR 3/4.7.12, Fire Rated Assemblies. The upgraded TS clarifies applicability at all times. Unlike the STS equivalent, no special reporting is required as an action. Loss of integrity in a fire barrier requires either establishing a continuous fire watch or verifying the operability of local fire detectors, both of which actions are equivalent to the 575. At FSV, an alternative is that an evaluation and determination can be made that the affected equipment separated by the barrier is not required to be . operable. The surveillance, although reformatted, has been adapted from and is equivalent to that of the STS. This specification is judged to be acceptable. 132 3/4,7 .8 SLRDIS Valves (Plant specific TS) Specification 3/4.7.8 on the Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System Valves is acceptable. This specification is new and is unique to Fort St. Vrain (there is no directly comparable instrumentation specification in the STS) . As a result of the NRC Staff review of the Licensee's April 1, 1985 First Draft TSUP, the NRC directed the Licensee to provide technical specifications on active components that are required to operate to satisfy other equipment within an environment for which it is quelified. 11 Thus the Licensee provided Section 3/4.7.8 on the valves activated by SLRDIS. The SLRDIS detects and isolates selected high energy line breaks (HELBS) in the secondary coolant system in both the Reactor and Turbine Buildings. The SLRDIS is required to prevent exceeding the harsh environment temperature profile to which the safe shutdown cooling system electrical equipment is qualified, per the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49. In Amendment No. 50, Steam Line Rupture Detection and Isolation System, the PPS circulator trip function on temperature rate of rise of the SLRDIS was approved (see Sections 3/4.3.1 and 2.2.4 of this report) . The present Section 3/4.7.8 is on the operability of the valves actuated by the SLRDIS for isolation of HELBS. Automatic actuation of the SLRDIS resulting from leak detection results in isolation of selected high energy steam lines (main steam, cold reheat, and hot reheat) in the secondary coolant system. This isolation assures that the resulting building harsh environments, without any credit for operator action, are less severe than the harsh environments previously established based on operator termination of a leak within four minutes (Appendix 1.6 of the FSAR) . The valves actuated by SLRDIS are listed in FSAR Table 7.3-3 and a discussion of the system is presented in FSAR Section 7.3.10 per FSAR Section 7.3.10.4.2 and as also specified in the TS applicability, SLRDIS isolation is not required below 2% rated thermal power. The Action Statement to restore an inoperable valve within 72 hours is adequate as the safety analysis for postulated pipe ruptures assumed single active failures (see FSAR Section 7.3.10.3.1). The Action Statement for restoring all but one of two or more inoperable valves within 24 hours is also consistent with the 24-hour action time to shutdown with inoperable PPS instrumentation (see Specification 3.3.1 Action Statement) and is more 133 I I rigorous than the majority of 72-hour action times for most other equipment. The surveillances to cycle the testable valves at least once per 92-days and the valves nontestable during plant operation at refueling are consistent with other valve surveillances (see for example SR 4.5.2.1a and b on testing the bearing water accumulator actuation valves) . Also for valve cycling testing, a 92-day surveillance or refueling cycle is also frequently used in the STS such as in SR 4.4.11.1 for reactor coolant system vent valves, or SR 4.6.4.2 for containment isolation valves. 3/4.7.9 Control Room Fmeraencv Ventilation System (Outside the Scope of the TSUP) The Control Room Emergency Ventilation System TS is acceptable for the interim but is an open issue outside the TSUP relative to compliance with Generic Letters 83-36, 37. The technical justification for acceptance of the Licensee's new section on the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System, patterned after STS Section 3.7.7, is therefore, not the subject of this report, but may be found in the references of the summary discussion of Section 1.6.1 of this report. No additional conversion to the TSUP was necessary as the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System was specified by the Licensee in the TSUP even though the review.was outside the scope of the TSUP. As this section is new, it is an added commitment by the Licensee over and above the existing TSs. Rather than the two independent control room emergency ventilation systems specified in the Generic Letters 83-36, 37, the NRC has previously83 accepted that only one is required at FSV. PSC's Actions and Surveillances do not comply in certain areas with those of the Generic Letters 83-36, 37 guidelines, and are still open licensing issues that will be processed by a future separate licensing action. As the STS Section 3.7.7 has incorporated the requirements of the Generic Letters 83-36, 37, the review against the Generic Letters 83-36, 37 more than encompasses the review for TSUP alone. The Control Room Emergency Ventilation System requirements are discussed in Sections 7.4.1 and 11.2.2.6 of the FSAR. The FSAR requirements for operability of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation system in the recirculation mode with minimum makeup and operability of the critical components of the filter 134 fan (C-7506) , supply fan (C-7504X) , and makeup ventilation filter (F-7502) have been appropriately incorporated into the Technical Specifications. Thus new Section 3/4.7.9 on the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System is accepted subject to the ongoing resolution for the actions and surveillances. 3/4,7, 10 Snubbers, (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Snubber section of the existing Specifications LC0 4.3.10 and SR 5.3.8 was carried over and substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Section 3/4.7.9. The operability was extended to include not only snubbers on Class 1 piping systems but also snubbers on non-Class 1 systems whose failure could adversely effect Class 1 systems. Snubber type (of the same design and manufacturer) was clarified for its use within the surveillances. A Transient Event Inspection (4.7.10.d), Functional Test Failure Analysis (4.7.10.g), and Functional Testing of Repaired and Replaced Snubbers were added to the surveillance requirements. The Applicability to only the Power and Low Power modes was justified by the Licensee by demonstrating that cooldown could be accomplished from 35% power operation with only the PCRV Liner Cooling System. The analysis approved by NRC letter dated February 7, 198688 demonstrated that cooldown would be accomplished without significant damage to any of the fission product barriers, including the fuel particle coatings. Snubbers are not used on the PCRV Liner Cooling System but are only used on high temperature systems. The analysis included cases with the PCRV depressurized thus encompassing situations, with failure of Class 1 piping possibly due to inoperable snubbers. This analysis confirmed that snubber operability is not required below the Lower Power mode cutoff of 5% power. The relaxation from 10% in the existing TS to 5% in the TSUP of additional snubbers to be tested when the first 10% sample failed the acceptance criterion was justified by the Licensee. The Licensee noted that the NRC Staff approved the revised requirement for the Fermi Unit 2 135 _ m. reactor based on the fact that the ASME Group approved the revision in 3M4, "Examination and Performance Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Dynamic Restraints (Snubbers) ." Since, the NRC Staff did not require a site specific justification for the Fermi Unit 2 reactor, it was judged that one was not required for Fort St. Vrain. Another minor relaxation from the existing TS was deletion of Actions c), d) , and e) of LCO 4.3.10 and the deletion of the snubber lists in Table 4.3, 10-1. These deleted items were not required by the STS and were judged inconsequential. The deletion of the snubber lists was approved by the NRC Staff in Amendment No. 59 to the FSV license. The deletion of the snubber lists is also consistent with the guidance in Generic Letter 84.13, Technical Specifications for Snubbers. 1/4.8 AUXILIARY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS 3/4.8. 1 A. C. Power Sources 3/4.8.1 ,1 A. C. Power Sources--Operatioa Section 3/4.8.1.I covers limiting conditions of operation (LCO) and surveillance requirements. These LCOs and surveillance requirements cover the offsite sources of ac electrical power and onsite standby diesel generators. Action statements are included should an LCO not be met. This section is an adaptation of the STS. For power and low power modes, and for startup and shutdown modes when the calculated bulk core temperature is greater than 760-F,a the LCOs specify that the reserve auxiliary transformer a. The concept of using the calculated bulk core temperature of 760'F as a demarcation was approved in Amendment No. 57 of the existing technical specifications.50 We find the use of this demarcation, as proposed by the licensee, acceptable in the electrical power systems. It parallels the STS demarcation of 3506F for LWR coolant temperature. 136 (RAT), the unit auxiliary transformer (UAT) in conjunction with the main power transformer (MPT), and the two standby diesel generators are to be operable. The diesel generator requirements further specify diesel fuel oil day tank minimum level , diesel fuel oil storage requirements and fuel oil flow path capability, operability of the water-jacket heaters and lubricating oil storage requirements. These requirements support the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) . There is a difference in nomenclature, in that the STS specifies "two physically independent circuits between the offsite transmission network and the onsite Class lE Distribution System," whereas the draft Technical Specifications specify the Unit Auxiliary Transformer (UAT) in conjunction with the main power transformer (MPT), and the Reserve Auxiliary Transformer (RAT) . These two circuits (the VAT and MPT, and the RAT) are the two independent circuits referred to in the STS. The MPT must be operable for the unit auxiliary transformer to be a viable source of offsite power. This was discussed with the licensee, and the MPT is included in the March (and May) 1988 submittal . In a similar manner, the May 1988 draft also contains nomenclatures and volumes specific to the standby diesel generators of the Fort St. Vrain station. The fuel and lubricating oil is said to be sufficient for operation of a diesel generator set for 7 days without replenishment. The specification for a minimum total volume of 100 gallons of lubricating oil in storage for the diesel generators goes beyond the STS requirements and is acceptable. This lubricating oil is hand-fed to the diesel lubricating oil sumps. We find that these LCOs are an appropriate adoption of the STS LCO requirements and, therefore, they are acceptable. Action Statements, Action statements for Section 3.8.1.1 are provided for a) inoperability of either offsite power source (the UAT and MPT or RAT), 137 I I J b) inoperability of either standby diesel generator set, c) inoperability of either offsite powe- source in combination with an inoperable standby diesel generator set, d) inoperability of both standby diesel generator sets, e) diesel fuel oil impurity, and f) diesel fuel oil storage tank (T-9201) unavailability. While there are differences between the STS and the 1988 drafts, these are rooted in the differences between a light water reactor (LWR) and the Fort St. Vrain reactor, a high temperature gas reactor (HTGR) . For instance, the LWR STS calls for a reduction of mode through hot standby to cold shutdown if an LC0 is not met. For the Fort St. Vrain HTGR, a direct transition to shutdown is required in less than the total allowable time for the equivalent transition for an LWR. The STS does not have an action statement regarding fuel oil purity. We find that the May 1988 draft technical specification action statements for Section 3.8.1.1 are suitable for the Fort St. Vrain reactor, meet the intent and function of the LWR STS, and are acceptable. Surveillance Requirements Section 4.8.1 .1 contains surveillance requirements that demonstrate the operability of offsite power and the standby diesel generators. Site specific nomenclature is added, as well as site-specific requirements, such as verifying, during shutdown, that the unit generator links can be tagged out and removed within 6 hours; verifying the fuel oil quantity in storage and day tanks (20,000 gallons (>5,500 gallons in 1-9201) and 325 gallons respectively) and the lubricating oil inventory (100 gallons); and verifying the operation of the diesel jacket heater system. Where the Fort St. Vrain station uses tandem diesels to drive a common generator, specific requirements involving the diesel shutdown and declutch functions are included. Performance-based diesel generator surveillance testing is required. This testing is based on NRC Generic Letter 84-15 and on the standard technical specifications that incorporate the generic letter requirements. Reporting requirements are added if more than 3 failures occur in the most recent 20 attempted starts. We find this surveillance testing acceptable. 138 J Section 4,8.1.1.2a.S limits the time until the diesel generators automatically start to 60 seconds. Typically, the air start receivers are exhausted after approximately 20 seconds. The diesel generator sets, if not started from the normal preheated condition within this time are considered inoperable. The standard Technical Specifications allow 10 seconds to achieve rated speed, voltage, and frequency. The licensee has committed to measure the actual diesel generator start time and trend this information to allow repairs before a failure to start occurs. Additionally. PSC states that they are allowed 90 minutes to restore circulation in a loss of forced circulation event. Based on this, and the commitment to trend the starting time, we find the proposed technical specifications acceptable in regard to the start time of the diesel generators. Section 4.8.1.1.2d of the STS imposes quarterly testing of fuel oil in storage and any new fuel oil prior to its addition to storage. Section 4.8.1 .1 .2c of the FSV Technical Specifications imposes monthly testing of the fuel oil in storage. Additionally, it tests new fuel oil deliveries before addition to storage for clarity, color, flash point, and kinematic viscosity. Per Reference 55, the testing of the diesel fuel oil has been addressed separately by the NRC in response to previous PSC correspondence.12 Therefore, it will not be considered further here. The testing specified is stated to be in conformance with the conclusions of that NRC review. Section 4.8.1.1e.8 requires a refueling test of the diesel generators at greater or equal to 1200 kW for the last 22 hours of the 24 hour test. The continuous rating of the diesel generator sets is 1210 kW. This provision is a direct carryover from the STS. However, due to the operation at greater than or equal to the continuous rating of the generator and to the potential for instrumentation inaccuracies, the licensee agreed that the test should be specified as a range of power. The licensee determined that a range of 1150 ± 50 kW steady state (1260 ± 60 kW for the 2 hour overload test) was suitable, provided a footnote allows operation outside of this band for momentary transients that occur 139 when starting a large motor. This would prevent this potential for overloading the diesel generator sets, which could result in shortening the life of the generator windings. We find the proposed test limits and surveillance requirements specified in the May 1988 draft acceptable. 3/4.8. 1 .2 A. C. Power Sources--Shutdown For startup and shutdown modes when the calculated bulk core temperature is equal to or less than 760'F and for the refueling mode, either the UAT and MPT or the RAT and one of the two standby diesel generator sets are to be operable. If the LCO is not met, the action statement is to immediately suspend 1) all core alteration operations. 2) control rod movement that results in positive reactivity charges, and 3) movement of irradiated fuel . The operable status of the required sources is to be restored as soon as possible. This section does not impose any additional surveillance requirements beyond those used for operating conditions. Specifically, surveillance requirements 4.8.1.1.1 and 4.8.1.1.2 are imposed for shutdown conditions. These requirements support the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of the updated FSAR. The technical specifications imposed by this section differ from the Standard Technical Specifications in plant-specific areas. The diesel generator requirements are the same as for operating conditions, except that only one diesel generator set, with corresponding fuel and lubrication oil quantities, is required to be operable. This diesel generator set and the one operable offsite source (either the UAT and MAT or the RAT), parallel the Standard Technical Specification wording and are acceptable. The action statement includes the elements from the Standard Technical Specification action statement, except for depressurizing and venting the LWR water-filled reactor coolant system. This is not applicable to the Fort St. Vrain design. Based on this design difference between the HTGR and an LWR, we find this adaptation of the STS acceptable for this section of the proposed Technical Specifications. 140 3/4.8.2 D. C. Ppwor Snurrec, 3/4.8.2. 1 D. C. Power Sources--Ooeratino Section 3/4.8.2. 1 covers limiting conditions of operation (LCO) and surveillance requirements. These LCOs and surveillance requirements cover the sources of dc electrical power (batteries and battery chargers) and include action statements should an LCO not be met. This section is an adaptation of the STS, and supports the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of the updated FSAR. - For power and low power modes, and for startup and shutdown when the calculated bulk core temperature is greater than 760°F, the LCOs specify that batteries 1A, 1B, and IC shall each be operable, with each battery having a dedicated, operable battery charger. Spare battery charger 1D can be connected as a dedicated battery charger to - batteries 1A, 18, or 1C. These LCOs prevent battery charger 1D from being connected to more than one battery at a time. The STS is written around a two division dc power system, and specifically allows plant-specific modifications for differing designs. 'he Fort St. Vrain dc power system consists of 2 dc buses (1A and 18), each with its own battery (1A and 19) and battery charger (IA and 18) , battery 1C and battery charger 1C that power vital 120 V instrument buses 1C and IC-1, and spare battery charger 1D. At present, there is no bus 1C, but there are plans to amend the upgraded technical specifications _ when this bus is added. Battery charger 1D can be aligned to, and thus dedicated to, any of the three batteries should the normal battery chargers (1A, 16 or 1C) be out of service. Action Statements The STS has a single action statement covering both batteries and battery chargers. The May 1988 draft contains separate action statements concerning batteries and battery chargers. 141 - I We have had two concerns with the proposed action statements. The first concerns the equalizing charge. The November 1985 draft allowed a battery to be out of service for 5 days. The lead-antimony batteries being installed in the Spring of 1988 to replace the lead-calcium batteries are stated to require up to 5 days for an equalizing charge. This was stated (References 16 and 23) to be necessary for an equalizing charge for either type of battery. Five days of unavailability is unacceptable for battery unavailability other than equalizing charges. Because of this, Reference 55 changed this action statement. There was also (Reference 16) a concern expressed concerning how often an equalizing charge could be applied. It is clear to us that the 5-day limit should apply to an equalizing charge. The licensee acknowledges this and has incorporated this limit. Also, should a battery require excessively frequent equalizing charges, its capacity and capability to supply the necessary loads in an emergency situation, where the battery charger is unavailable through failure or loss of ac power, would be doubtful . PSC has agreed that a limit of two equalizing charges per quarter while in startup, low power or power modes is acceptable. During periods of shutdown, no such limits would apply. Equalizing charges will not occur to two batteries simultaneously during startup, low power or power modes, as this is prevented by Section 3.8.3.19 and h and associated Action Statement c. Based on the applied limitations on equalizing charges, we find the proposed plant specific technical specifications and LC0s acceptable in this regard. A second concern is that the August 1987 draft allowed a battery charger to become inoperable, with no requirement to restore an operable dedicated charger to that battery. The battery would be allowed to discharge to the point of becoming inoperable before action is required to restore its status or to shutdown the station. This deficiency was discussed with the licensee, and the technical specifications were corrected in the March 1988 draft to require an operable battery charger 142 (by either repair or connection of the spare battery charger) to be connected to the affected battery. Therefore, we find the proposed action statements (applicable to all operating modes) acceptable. Surveillance Requirements Section 4.8.2.1 contains surveillance requirements that demonstrate the operability of the dc power sources. It is an adaptation of the STS. Table 4.8.2.1 (Reference 16) was reviewed by the licensee to determine that the specific float voltage and specific gravity requirements were correct. We note that battery 1C is of different capacity than batteries IA and 16. Reference 55 has changed the Category A specific gravity to ≥1.205 (from ≥1.200) ; the other table figures remained the same. The licensee states that this was the only parameter that needed to be changed for their batteries and that the corrected table applies to both the existing lead-calcium and the replacement lead-antimony batteries. These values are carried over to the March (and May) 1988 draft. Thus, we find the proposed battery surveillance requirements acceptable. 3/4.8.2.2 0. C. Power Sources--Shutdown For startup and shutdown modes when the calculated bulk core temperature is equal to or less than 760'F, and for the refueling mode, two of the three batteries must be operable; each of the two operable batteries having a dedicated, operable battery charger connected. Battery charger ID can be connected as a dedicated battery charger. This is a carryover from the existing technical specifications that parallels the Standard Technical Specification requirement for one battery and associated charger out of the two installed to be operable. The action statement is similar to that for operating modes, discussed previously, and adjusted for two battery/battery chargers instead of three. Surveillance requirements are those associated with operating modes, Section 4.8.2.1. We find that the draft technical specifications for Section 3/4.8.2.2 meet the intent and function of both the LWR STS and the existing technical specifications, and support the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of 143 the updated FSAR. Therefore, this section of the upgraded Technical Specifications is acceptable. 3/4.8.3 Onsite Power Distribution 3/4.8.3. 1 Onsite Power Distribution--Operating Section 3/4.8.3.1 covers limiting conditions of operation (LCO) and surveillance requirements. These LCOs and surveillance requirements cover the Class lE electrical distribution system for operating conditions and include action statements should an LCO not be met. This section is a plant specific adaptation of the STS, and supports the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of the updated FSAR. For power and low power modes, and for startup and shutdown modes when the calculated bulk core temperature is greater than 760-F, each Class lE bus is required to be energized from its preferred or normal power source, with tie breakers open between all Class lE buses (to maintain independence and redundancy). We note that this tie breaker requirement does not apply to the 4160 Vac distribution system, which is not Class 1E. The action statements differ from those in the STS only in relation to the HTGR differences from a LMR. Again, the Fort St. Vrain allowable times are more conservative than those in the STS. The surveillance requirements are identical to the standard technical specifications. We find this adaptation of the STS for the proposed Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications acceptable. 3./4.SA,2 Onsite Power Distribution--Shutdown Section 3/4.8.3.2 covers limiting conditions of operation (LCO) and surveillance. requirements. These LCOs and surveillance requirements cover the Class 1E electrical distribution system for shutdown conditions and include action statements should an LCO not be met. This section is a plant specific adaptation of the STS, and supports the safety-significant features described in Section 8.2 of the updated FSAR. 144 For startup and shutdown modes when the calculated bulk core temperature is equal to or less than 760'F, and for the refueling mode, one bus at each voltage level (i .e. , 480 Vac, 120 Vac non-interruptible power, and 125 VDC) can be out of service. Tie breakers are to be open between redundant Class 1E buses. This tie breaker requirement is not applicable to the 4160 Vac distribution system, which is not Class 1E. The action statements differ from those in the STS only in relation to the HTGR differences from a LWR. Again, the Fort St. Vrain allowable times are more conservative than those in the STS. The surveillance requirements are identical to the standard technical specifications. We find this section of the proposed Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications acceptable. 3/4.8.4 ACM Diesel Generator Section 3/4.8.4 carries over and expands the limiting conditions of operation (LCO) and surveillance requirements from the existing Technical Specifications that cover the alternate cooling method (ACM) diesel generator. Action statements are included for when an LC0 is not met. The ACM diesel generator is an alternate means of providing electric power for cooling the reactor. It is capable of operation independently of disruptive faults or events, such as a fire in congested cable areas. The ACM diesel generator is manually started to provide power to selected equipment independently of the offsite power and Class IE diesel generators. This is done by the use of manual transfer switches that switch the load between the normal power source bus and the ACM diesel generator load center. We note that the ACM diesel generator is not safe shutdown cooling equipment. This section is not a part of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) as the ACM diesel generator is almost unique to Fort St. Vrain, and not typical of light water reactor stations. This section is carried over from Sections LCO 4.2.17 and SR 5.2.20 of the existing technical specifications, with expansion to conform to the format 145 of the STS. 1C0 4.2. 17-3, requiring at least 10,000 gallons of fuel in total storage is not covered in Section 3/4.8.4. It is covered in Section 3.8.1 . 1b.2, along with the fuel oil requirements for the standby diesel generators. The most obvious change is in the surveillance requirements for the non-Class lE ACM diesel generator. The surveillance requirements of SR 5.2.20 were minimal, including a weekly start and run test and a monthly 2 hour load test. The upgraded technical specification requirements, Section 4.8.4a, expand these requirements to include the following: o water jacket heater system o fuel oil transfer pumps o starting sequence (it starts and idles before ramping to operating speed) o load test This surveillance is normally performed monthly, but more frequently (weekly) if the past failure rate is 2 or more out of the last 20 tests. This is a performance based technical specification and parallels the diesel generator testing recommendations of Generic Letter 84-15 and the surveillance testing requirements discussed for the standby diesel generators (discussed in Section 2.1.1.2 of this report). Testing requirements in Section S4.8.4b, c, and d include the following: o starting battery electrolyte level (weekly) o starting battery terminal voltage ≥ 126 volts (weekly) o fuel oil (storage tank and day tank) sampling and testing (monthly) 146 o removal of accumulated water from the day tank (monthly and after 1 hour or more of operation) o inspection per manufacturers recommendations (refueling) o verification of connectable loads (refueling) o operability ;;f the day tank level instrumentation (refueling) o channel calibration of the engine protective channels (refueling) The surveillance requirements for the ACM diesel generator generally (although not entirely) follow the recommendations of Generic Letter 84-1S and the Standard Technical Specification requirements for Class lE diesel generators. These requirements include the existing Technical Specification requirements for the ACM diesel generator. Because the ACM diesel generator is not Class 1E, or safety-related, we find that the surveillance required by the upgraded technical specifications is suitable. Based on this, and on the carryover action statements and limiting conditions of operation, we find Section 3/4.8.4 acceptable. 3/4.9 FUEL HANDLING and STORAGE SYSTEMS 2/4.9.1 Fuel Handling and Maintenance in the Reactor. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Fuel Handling and Maintenance in the Reactor section of the existing Specification LCO 4.7.1 was carried over and was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like the STS Refueling Operations Section 3/4.9. Improvements included separating out the startup channel neutron flux monitors (see the discussion under 2.2.1.9 below). The Applicability was clarified to "whenever both primary and secondary RCRV closures of any PCRV penetration are removed" versus the less clear existing Applicability of "during any irradiated fuel handling in the reactor vessel ." The core average inlet 147 temperature of 165'F was clarified as only being applicable when the Fuel Handling Machine is on the reactor ve:cel with both the cask isolation valve and reactor isolation valve open. The 165'F limit is to assure FHM telescoping mast performance when it is inserted into the upper plenum of the reactor. Emphasis was added to maintain the Shutdown Margin by requiring its specification to be met and surveillances were added. This Fuel Handling TS is consistent with FSAR Section 9.1.1, Fuel Handling During Refueling. This TS does not have a directly comparable section in the STS. 3/4.9.2 Instrumentation. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The specification for the startup channel neutron flux monitors during refueling was carried over from the existing Specification LCO 4.7.1.C and was substantially improved by upgrading to be more like STS Section 3/4.9.2. One improvement was specifying Applicability throughout the refueling mode and ,not just during irradiated fuel handling in the reactor. Action statements comparable to the STS were added for both one and two inoperable startup channels. These actions required immediate suspension of any controllable evolutions which could result in positive reactivity changes. Surveillance requirements for startup channel channel checks and functional tests were also added comparable to those in the STS. This startup channel neutron flux monitor TS is consistent with FSAR Section 9.1.1, Fuel Handling During Refueling. 3/4.9.3 Fuel Handlina Machine. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Fuel Handling Machine existing Specifications LCO 4.7.2 and SR 5.7.1 was carried over and substantially improved to specify additional requirements as embodied in the licensing basis in the FSAR Section 9.1.1, Fuel Handling During Refueling. There is no STS equivalent to this specification. Specifications were added for the fuel handling purge system, availability of the gas waste system, augmented coiling coil requirements, overhead crane attachment, and operable switches and alarms for verifying correct orientation and placement of fuel elements. The Applicability was extended to cover use of the FHM for reactor internal maintenance as well as handling of irradiated fuel. The Action statements 148 I . I and surveillances were expanded to encompass the added specifications. Added surveillances included a 12 hour verification of NM internal pressure and cooling coil water outlet temperature, testing of the FHM cask valve and reactor isolation valve, inspecting the backup firewater connections, testing the fuel handling purge system and availability of the gas waste system, and testing the overhead crane. These specifications on the FHM adequately address the safety concerns of prevention of uncontrolled releases of radioactivity/radiation during handling of irradiated fuel , maintenance of fuel element integrity by providing a cooling helium atmosphere and protection against mechanical damage, and correct installation of fuel elements into the reactor core. 3/4.9.4 Fuel Storage Wells. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Fuel Storage Wells existing Specifications LCO 4.7.3 and SR 5.7.2 was carried over and substantially improved to specify added requirements from FSAR Section 9.1.2, Fuel Storage and Associated Fuel Handling. Although the STS has Section 3/4.9.11, Water Level-Storage Pool and 3/4.9. 12, Fuel Storage Pool Air Cleanup System, these are not directly applicable since the FSV Fuel Storage Wells are a dry storage in a helium atmosphere. Specification 3.9.3.c was added to not allow irradiated fuel to be located in the central column of a fuel storage well (irradiated fuel cannot be adequately cooled in the central column) . Surveillances were added for daily checking of well pressure, coiling coil outlet temperature and flowrate, 31 day verification of emergency booster fan manual initiation, 18 month verification of the 9000 CFM air flow through the fuel storage facility, and verification of no irradiated fuel storage in the central columns of the wells. Two relaxations of the existing Specifications LCO 4.7.3 and SR 5.7.2 were accepted in the carryover to the TSUP. First, in LCO 3.9.3.b, TSUP, the required minimum air flow through the fuel storage facility was decreased from 12,000 CFM to 9,000 CFM. The 9,000 CFM air flow is the required minimum per FSAR Sections 14.6.3.2 and 9.1.2.3 to _ avoid significant fuel damage from overheating. Second, engineering evaluation was accepted as an alternative to establishing backup cooling. 149 The licensee stated that the anticipated adiabatic heat up rate would be about 1 degree F per hour for a fuel element 100 days after removal from the reactor after full power operation. Anticipated small heatup rates allow adequate time to perform an engineering evaluation. These Fuel Storage Well specifications meet the FSAR Sections 9. 1.2 and 14.6.3 requirements of maintaining the fuel element surface temperature below 750*F in a dry slightly subatmospheric helium environment. - 3/4.9,5 Spent Fuel Shionino Cask. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Spent Fuel Shipping Cask existing Specification LCO 4.7.4 was carried over and was clarified to require 100 days decay of fuel before it would be loaded into the cask. An action statement was added to unload the cask if the fuel didn't meet the 100 days decay. Also, a surveillance was added to the decay time on the fuel prior to loading. This specification on the Spent Fuel Shipping Cask complies with the requirements identified in FSAR Section 14.6.3.3, Fuel Shipping Cask Handling Accident. This specification is similar to the specification of 100 days decay time of STS Section 3/4.9.3, Decay Time. 3/4.9.6 Communications During Core Alterations. (Specification adapted from STS) The Communications During Core Alterations Section is new and was adapted from the STS Section 3.9.5. The only difference being that at FSV, control room two-way communications are established with the Fuel Handling-Machine control room as the center for refueling operations rather than the "refueling station" in the STS. As this TSUP section on communications is new and is adapted from the STS, it is acceptable. X4,. 10 SPFCTAI TFST FX$PTIONS 314.1t1 Xenon Stability (Specification carryover from existing TS) The specification is an upgrade for the recently approved (License Amendment No. 47) existing Specification LCO 4.9.3. The engineering evaluation performed prior to xenon stability testing is to be • — 150 r a reviewed and approved by the NFSC under upgraded Specification AC 6.5.2.9.d. Results of previous analysis and tests are summarized in FSAR Sections 3.5.4.4, 13.4.2.I0, and 13.4.2.11. Although the 6-series startup test procedures have not been submitted for NRC review, given the NFSC oversight responsibilities, the upgraded specification is judged to be - acceptable. 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES - 5, 1 Site. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Site existing Specification DF 6.3 was carried over. The exclusion area and low population zone were clarified in revised Figures 5.1-1 and 5.1.2 to the type of scale and detail of the STS. Information on the security fence was deleted as this is proprietary information and is not in the STS Site Section 5.1. The Site TS 5.1 is consistent with the STS 5.1 on identifying the exclusion area, low population zone, and gaseous and liquid effluent release points, and is consistent with FSAR Section 2.1. - 5.2 Reactor Coolant System and Steam Plant System 5.2.1 Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel (PCRV1_ (Specification carryover from existing TS) 5.2.2 Steam Generator Orifices. (Specification carryover from existing TS) These design features are verbatim carryovers from the existing design features 6.2.1 and 6.2.2, respectively. Warn Safety Valves. (Specification deletion from existing TS) The Steam Safety Valves existing Specification OF 6.2.3 was deleted.The deletion is acceptable as the information has been augmented and now - appears in TSUP LCOs 3.1.1.5, Turbine Cycle Safety Valves - Operating, and 3.7. 1.6, Turbine Cycle Safety Valves - Shutdown together with Applicability, Action, and Surveillance Requirements. 151 - a 5.3 Reactor Core 5.3. 1 Reactor Assembly. (Specification carryover from existing TS) This section is virtually a verbatim carryover from the existing TS Section 6.1. 5.3.2 Active Core. (Specification carryover from existing TS) This section is virtually a verbatim carryover from the existing TS Section 6. 1 . 5,3.3 Fuel . (Specification carryover from existing TS) This section is virtually a verbatim carryover from the existing TS Section 6. 1 . 5.3.4 Reload Segment Desj,gn. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The specification is an upgrade that adapts into the STS design features format much of the information that was formally contained in the basis summary statement of existing Specification LCO 4.1.3. Existing Specification LCO 4.1.3, Rod Sequence, has been suspended during recent operation under the Interim Specifications for Reactivity Control Systems; however, the Interim Specifications did not address the analysis and evaluation performed outside the scope of the specification to establish an acceptable control rod pair withdrawal sequence. Specification DF 5.3.4 of the FSV upgraded TS reiterates the acceptance criteria for the control rod pair withdrawal sequence as formerly given in the cited basis summary statement from the existing TS and adds the general requirements for new fuel and burnable poison loadings that were not specifically addressed in the existing TS but are provided in FSAR Sections 3.5.1 through 3.5.6. 152 In the proposed upgraded TS for FSV, the cycle-dependent control rod withdrawal sequence (which is hard-wired and checked before reload cycle startup) , the reload segment fuel loading and distribution and toe reload segment burnable poison loading and distribution are broadly defined to be among "those features of the facility such as materials of construction and geometric arrangements, which, if altered or modified, would have a significant effect on safety" as used to define design features per 10CFR Part 50.36(c)(4) . Under the provisions of I0CFR Part 50.59, review, audit, and approval of the reload segment nuclear performance characteristics against the acceptance criteria and requirements for the reload segment design feature have been vested in the NFSC per the provisions of upgraded Specifications AC 6.5.2.8.a, AC 6.5.2.8.f, AC 6.5.2.9.a, AC 6.5.2.9.b, AC 6.5.2.9.d, AC 6.5.2.10.a, AC 6.5.2.10.c, and AC 6.5.2.10.d. Records of the NFSC review, audit, and approval process are maintained for NRC inspection per upgraded Specification AC 6.5.2.12. As indicated above, the reload segment design section is new to the Design Features section, and the format has been adapted from the STS OF 5.3. 1 . It identifies acceptance criteria for rod pair reactivity worths, shutdown margin, temperature coefficients of reactivity, and power peaking limits such that reload configurations are designed to be compatible with existing FSAR safety analysis. The only relation to STS DF 5.3.1 is that both relate to reload fuel ; otherwise, the FSV TSUP information is unique to FSV. The power peaking information presented is somewhat analogous to the information required on Fxy in STS AC 6.9.1.6, Radial Peaking Factor Limits Report. However, the FSV fuel damage limits have only been related to the gross peaking factors of Region Peaking Factor, Axial Peaking Factor (actually top and bottom zone peaking, see FSAR Section 3.5.1.2), and Intra-Region Peaking Factor rather than the more detailed Fxy specifications on core region outlet temperature, in upgraded Specification 3/4.2.4, and power-to-flow ratio limits, in upgraded Specification 3/4.2.6. These gross peaking factor design limits are as stated to ensure the validity of power peaking assumptions in the safety analysis of FSAR Sections 3.2.3.1, 3.5.4.1, 153 3.5.4.2, 3.5.4.3, 3.6.4.6, and 3.6.4.7. Controlling on the more global power distribution limits and region outlet temperatures, and power-to-flow ratio limits has been possible because of the large margin between the nominal maximum fuel temperature of 2372'F and that of the 2:00'F which must be experienced for long periods before the onset of rapid deterioration of the fuel particle fission product barrier (FSAR Section 3.2.3.3) . Given the NFSC oversight responsibility discussed above, the specification is judged to be acceptable. 5.3.5 Reflector. (Specification carryover from existing TS) This section is virtually a verbatim carryover from the existing TS Section 6.1. 5.3.6 Control Rods. (Specification adapted from STS) The Control Rods section is new to the Design Features section of the TS and has been adapted from the STS Section 5.3.2, Control Rod Assemblies. The design information presented is unique to FSV and is consistent with FSAR Section 3.5.3.1 and highlights the following safety significant information. The central 19 rod pairs are of lower boron weight fraction, 0.30, than that of the outer 18 rod pairs, 0.40. The lower boron weight fraction for the central 19 rod pairs is to enhance their temperature stability sot hat after melting of the steel cladding, during the postulated Loss of Forced Circulation (LOFC) accident (DBA-1), the boron graphite compact retains enough structural stability to ensure that reactor shutdown will be maintained (see FSAR Sections 14.10.3.3 and D.1.2.3.2). The 810 depletion in the boron graphite compact over the six years before control rod replacement decreases the reactivity worth of the control rod by less than 5%, not enough to cause any unacceptable neutronic behavior. LL7 Reserve Shutdown System. (Specification adapted from STS) The Reserve Shutdown System section is new to the Design Features section of the TS and adds to the design information on shutdown 154 capability beyond that of the STS Section 5.3.2 on control rod assemblies. The design information presented is unique to FSV and is consistent with FSAR Section 3.5.3.3. The central 19 regions again contain a lower boron concentration (20% 84C by weight) . Again this is to enhance structural stability of the balls during the postulated LOFC accident when the central regions experience high temperature. 5.4 Fuel Storage 5.4. 1 Criticality. (Specification adapted from STS) The Criticality section is new to the Design Features of the TS and has been adapted from STS Section 5.6.1.1. The FSV spent fuel storage is in dry wells not racks as in PWRs. The maximum Keff of 0.90 is for partially flooded conditions. Under full flooding the Keff is 0.85. This design information is consistent with FSAR Section 9.1.2.3, but the analytical technique and the basis of verification are not described in the FSAR. 5.4,2 Containment. (Specification adapted from STS) The Containment section is new to the Design Features of the TS and provides additional information on fuel storage at FSV beyond the requirements of the STS. At FSV the fuel storage wells are designed for gas and water - tight containment. This minimizes leakage of potential contaminants (see FSAR Section 9.1.2.4) . - 5.4.3 Neutron Absorber-Heat Sip, . (Specification adapted from STS) The Neutron Absorber Heat Sink section is new to the Design Features of the TS and provides additional information on fuel storage at FSV - beyond the requirements of the STS. Namely, that the granular material (iron slag) used to fill the space between the inner tank and outer cylindrical wall acts as a built-in neutron absorber and heat sink. 5.5 Meteorological Tower Locating. (Specification adapted from — STS) The designation of the meteorological tower location is new to the Design Features TS and is adapted directly from STS Section 5.5. The designated location is consistent with FSAR Sections 2.8.5 and G.2. 155 • 5.6 Cpmoonent and Transient Cycle limit. (Specification adapted from STS) The designation of cyclic limits is new to the Design Features TS and is adapted from STS Section 5.7. The component and limits identified in Table 5.6.1 are unique to FSV. 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS j Responsibility. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Responsibility section information was updated from the existing FSV Specification AC 7.1.1 to the content of the STS Section 6.1. The station manager and shift supervisor responsibility are specified for overall unit operation and control room command function, respectively. As the shift supervisor's office at FSV is adjacent to and has a direct access door to the control room, the shift supervisor's office is included as the location for the shift supervisor. The responsibility designation is consistent with FSAR Section 12.1.1. §.2 Organization. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Organization section information is acceptable and is basically from the existing FSV Specifications AC 7.1.1.1 and 7.1.1.2 but updated and reformatted to the STS. The Management, 6.2.1, and Unit Staff, 6.2.2, organizations of Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 respectively were deleted in accordance with Generic Letter 88-06.89 The aspects of the deleted organization charts important to safety have been retained as directed in the Generic Letter 88.06. In the Management organization, Vice President Nuclear Operations replaced Vice President Electric Production. General Manager Fossil Production was deleted and Nuclear Training Manager was added. These changes reflect the Licensee's commitment to strengthen the management of nuclear operations by segregating the highest nuclear management level reporting to the President and Chief Executive Officer from the management involved in fossil electric production. The Nuclear Training Manager management position was also strengthened by now reporting directly to the Vice President Nuclear Operations in parallel with rather than to the Manager Nuclear Production Division. These latter changes on management structure and titles were approved by the NRC staff in letter dated May 24, 198890. 156 The minimum shift crew composition, Table 6.2-1, is acceptable as it is a direct carryover from the existing TS Table 7.1-1 and agrees with the STS requirements of Table 6.2-1 except for the after normal working hours call arrangement for the Shift Technical Advisor. The unit staff functions, 6.2.2 and 6.2.3, are again carryovers from the existing TS and agree well with the same STS functions of 6.2.2 and 6.2.4, respectively. In 6.2.2.b the staff qualification required when fuel is in the reactor was reduced to just a "licensed operator" from a "licensed senior operator" in the existing TS to just meet the similar STS requirement. There is nothing unique at FSV to require a higher qualification than that of the STS. FSV does not have in the TSUP an Independent Safety Engineering Group like the STS Section 6.2.3. The NRC Staff agreed with - PSC that to pursue the ISEG function to FSC would be a new licensing issue outside the scope of the TSUP. 6.3 Unit Staff Oualifications. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The unit staff qualifications information is acceptable and is directly from the existing FSV Specifications AC 7.1.1.2.9 and 7.1 . 1.2.h. As throughout the Administrative Control section, the material was reorganized to agree with the STS organization. PSC does not include _ reference to the supplemental requirements of Sections A and C to Enclosure 1 of the NRC letter of March 28, 1980. PSC believes they meet the intent of this NRC letter, but in some areas, such as use of a simulator, they could not comply. The NRC approved PSC's Licensed Operator Requalification Program in their letter of June 4, 1987 and, therefore, in the TSUP the NRC Staff accepted PSC's position with regard to the subject letter. These TS staff qualifications agree with those of FSAR Section 12.1.4. 6.4 Training. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The -- Training section is acceptable and is a direct carryover from the existing Specification AC 7.1.1.3 and agrees with STS Sections 6.4, Training, and 6.2.4, Shift Technical Advisor. Again the supplemental requirements of Sections A and C of Enclosure 1 of the March 28, 1980 NRC letter are not specified as PSC has not entirely committed to those requirements see 2.2.2.13 directly above). 157 • 6.5 Review and Audit. .U.1 Plant Operations Review Committee (PORCfy (Specification carryover from existing TS) The PORC section is acceptable and is a direct carryover from the existing Specification AC 7.1.2 and agrees with STS Section 6.5. 1 . The PORC composition, 6.5.1.2, substantially exceeds the minimum multidisciplinary membership of the same STS Section. Under STS Section 6.5.1.6.a, Responsibilities, the PORC does not review proposed programs required by FSV Specification 6.8.4. The NRC Staff accepted this omission in their letter dated March 8, 198491 relative to Generic Letters 83-36 and 83-37, Item II.F.1.2. Nevertheless, the Licensee stated that review of programs is a function of the FSV Nuclear Facility Safety Committee (NFSC) under specification 6.5.2.8. The information of FSV TS Section 6.5,1 is also consistent with the PORC requirements in FSAR Sections 12.5.2. 6.5.2 Nuclear Facility Safety Committee (NF$C). (Specification carryover from existing TS) The NFSC section is acceptable and is a direct carryover from the existing Specification AC 7.6.1.3 and agrees with STS Section 6.5.2. Review item 6.5.2.7.h, existing Specification AC 7. I .3.d) .8 was reworded from reviewing "any indication that there may be a deficiency" to "all recognized indication of an unanticipated deficiency. " The latter words are directly from the STS, 6.5.2.7.h, better define the intent of reviewing unanticipated deficiencies, and are, therefore, acceptable. Item, 6.5.2.7.1, on NFSC reviewing the calculated base reactivity curve for use with each cycle was added by the Licensee and is viewed as a desirable element of establishing expected shutdown capability. FSV TS audit items, 6.5.2.8.e, on review of the facility Emergency Plan, 6.5.2.8.f, on review of the facility security plan, and 6.5.2.8.k, on review of activities required by the Quality Assurance Program exceed STS audit item requirements. Section 6.5.2.9 is unique to FSV and is on NFSC approvals for the control rod sequence in LCO 3.1.4 and OF 5.3.4, base reactivity curve in LCO 3.1.7, LCO 3.10.1 on xenon stability testing engineering evaluation, and proposed changes to facility operating procedures and tests or experiments that are determined to 158 L l.. • . I I involve an unreviewed environmental question. These added NFSC approval requirements were committed to by the licensee during the review of LCOs 3. 1 .4 and 3.1.7. The information of FSV TS 6.5.2 is also consistent with the NFSC requirements in FSAR Section 12.5.3. 6.6 Reportable Events Action. (Specification carryover from existing TS) Section 6.6 on Reportable Events Action is acceptable and is a combination of FSV existing Specification AC 7.5.2 and addition of STS 6.6. 1 .b on the requirement that each Reportable Event be reviewed by PORC and be submitted to the NFSC and Station Manager, and is, therefore, acceptable. 6. 7 Safety Limit Violations. (Specification carryover from existing TS) Although the FSV existing Specification AC 7.2 is on Safety Limit Violations, the TSUP Section 6.7 wording was chosen to agree with that of STS Section 6.7, Safety Limit Violation. Section 6.7 is acceptable as the new wording is essentially verbatim from the STS and, except for allowing 30 days versus 10 days to submit the Licensee Event Report to the Commission. carries over all the existing TS requirements. 6.E Procedures and Programs. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The existing FSV Specification AC 7.4 on procedures was carried over into TSUP Sections 6.8.1, 6.8.2, and 6.8.3 in STS format. And, TSUP Section 6.8.4 on programs was directly added almost verbatim from STS Section 6.8.4. The FSV procedure sections 6.8.1, 6.8.2, and 6.8.3 exceed the requirements of the same STS sections except that FSV has not committed to the emergency procedures required to implement the requirement of NUREG-0737 and supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 (see STS 6.8.1.b). This issue is outside the scope of the TSUP. In TSUP 6.8.1.6, reference for quality assurance in the existing TS to "using the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.21 June 1974 and Regulatory Guide 4.1 Revision 1, April 1975" was deleted as it is not specifically called out in the STS. Although, this constitutes a relaxation from the existing TS, it was judged acceptable as a clarification of actual review practice. The FSV TS procedures requirements are consistent with or exceed those of FSAR Section 12.3. 159 The NRC staff initially did not agree90 with the changes allowing a P0RC subcommittee to review procedure changes (AC 6.8.2 of the TSUP) or temporary changes (AC 6.8.3.C of the TSUP). The NRC Staff has indicated that based upon additional information received from the licensee that these changes are now acceptable and will be so documented. The existing TS 7.4 did not have any requirements relative to programs so these were selectively added from the STS Section 6.8.4. As FSV has no comparables to the STS primary coolant sources outside containment (recirculation spray, safety injection, chemical and volume control , gas stripper, and hydrogen recombiners) or subcooling margin, these items are not in the TSUP. 5.9 Reporting Requirements. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Reporting Requirements section is acceptable as it is a carryover from existing Specification AC Section 7.5 but upgraded to the wording and format of the STS Section 6.9. 6.9. 1 Routine Reports and Reportable Events The information under 6.9.1.2, Annual Reports and Summary was significantly upgraded to address additional requirements in the STS. Information on specific activity analyses in the primary coolant, 6.9.1.2.a.2, was added per STS 6.9.1.2.b. Also, added following STS requirements was March 31 of each year for submittal of the annual occupation exposure report and reference to a footnote noting that the tabulation supplements requirements of 10 CFR Part 20.407 in TSUP 6.9.1.2.a.1. PSC, also, voluntarily added 6.9.1.2.c, Annual Diesel Generator Reliability Report, which is not an 5T5 requirement. This annual summary report is an addition to the special reporting requirements for diesel generator failures of specification 4.8.1.1.2.h and AC 6.9.2. The Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, TSUP Section 6.9.1.3 is a carryover from existing TS 7.5.1.e with some deletions to agree with the content of the same material in the STS, 6.9.1.4. The 160 paragraph on hourly meteorological data on existing TS P. 7.5-7 and 7.5-8 was moved to Section 6.10.1 in the TSUP because it is a requirement on record retention. The information on Licensee initiated changes to the radioactive waste system was mostly deleted, except for new references stating inclusion pursuant to Specifications 6.13, 6.14, and 6.15, as it is not treated in the STS. PSC added a commitment in the subject report like that in the STS to explain uncorrected inoperability of liquid or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and reasons for exceeding the liquid hold-up tanks or gas storage tanks limits of ELCo 8.1.2 or 8.1.1, respectively. Information on the Monthly Operating Report, TSUP Section 6.9.1.4, is a verbatim carryover from existing TS 7.5.1.c and is comparable to the like information in STS Section 6.9.1.5. The existing TS Section 7.5.2, Reportable Events, was deleted in the TSUP as the information was redundant to 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73 and 10 CFR requirements are already referenced in the opening paragraph of TSUP Section 6.9.1.b. 6.9.2 Snerial Renorts PSC added Section 6.9.2 on Special Reports comparable to that in STS Section 6.9.2. 6.9.3 Non-Routine Radiological Reogrj s The information on Non-Routine Radiological Reports in existing Specification AC 7.5.3 was carried over verbatim into TSUP Section 6.9.3. ¢y,10 Record Retention. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Record Retention Section 6.10 is acceptable and is mostly a carryover of existing Specification AC 7.3 but improved to be comparable to STS Section 6.10. Records of reactor tests and experiments and of radioactive shipments were moved from five years retention to the duration of the operating license to be consistent with the STS requirements. And items 6.10.2.m and 6.10.2.n on records for snubbers and secondary water sampling and water quality, respectively, were added to match similar requirements 161 in the STS. Item 6. 10.3.m of the STS on records of analysis required by the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program was judged outside the scope of the TSUP. This material on records is consistent with the requirements in FSAR Section 12.4. 6. 11 Radiation Protection Proatam. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Radiation Protection Program, Section 6.11, is a verbatim carryover of existing Specification AC 7.4.d and exceeds the requirements of the similar Section in the STS, also 6.11. 6, 12 Hiah Radiation Area. (Specification adapted from existing TS) The High Radiation Area Section was added as an upgrade and was adopted almost verbatim from the STS. The slight differences in wording are because of FSV differences and are acceptable. 6. 13 Process Control Proaram (PCP). (Specification adapted from STS) The Process Control Program section was added as an upgrade and was adopted verbatim from the STS Section 6.13. ¢,,14 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM). (Specification adapted from STS) The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual section was added as an upgrade and was adopted verbatim from the STS Section 6.14. 6.15 Major chances to l.iouid. Gaseous. and Solid Radwaste Treatment Systems. (Specification adapted from STS) The Major Changes to Liquid, Gaseous, and Solid Radwaste Treatment Systems, TSUP Section 6.15, was added as an upgrade and was adopted verbatim from the STS Section 6.15. 6.16 Fuel Surveillance Proaram. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Fuel Surveillance Program, TSUP Section 6.16, is a rearrangement in format of the wording of existing Specification AC 7.7 approved in License Amendment No. 4E, and is therefore acceptable. The fuel surveillance program at FSV is described in FSAR Appendix 3 and implements the fuel examinations of the Subject TS. 162 §. 17 Environmental Oualification. (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Environmental Qualification TSUP Section 6. 17, is a verbatim carryover from existing Specification AC 7.6. These specifications go beyond the STS which does not have a requirement in this area, Environmental qualification is now covered by a rulemaking in 10 CFR 50.49 and so is no longer in the STS. The FSV response to 10 CFR 50.49 has been approved by the NRC Staff and is documented in FSR Section 1 .4.6. The information in TSUP 6.11 serves, therefore, as documentation of earlier agreements. 6, 18 Inservice Inspection and Testing (ISIT) Program. (Specification adapted from STS) The Inservice Inspection and Testing Program (ISIT), TSUP Section 6.18, is new. Although there is no counterpart in STS Section 6, it is together with TSUP Section 4.0.5.a, the FSV equivalent to the ISIT requirement of STS 4.0.5.a. As the FSV ISIT is only now being developed, the subject basic requirements document PSC's commitment to them, and are, therefore, acceptable. Section 1.6.5 of this report discusses the ISIT itself, which is outside the scope of the TSUP. 7. NOT USED 8.0 RADIOLOGICAL and ENVIRONMENTAL (Specification carryover from existing TS) The Radiological and Environmental Section was not evaluated under the TSUP as this section had already undergone a recent major revision in Amendment 3758 (see Section 2.2.1). • 163 w 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of the audits, documentation, correspondence. meetings, and teleconferences beginning in July of 1984 and extending through June of 1988, the FSV TSUP license amendment proposal has been found acceptable. The Licensee's TSUP has been documented most recently in the Licensee's letters of May 27, 19881 proof and review copy supplemented by the added safety analyses of June 14, 19882 and the letter of August 5, 1983. The Licensee's technical specifications resulting from the TSUP meet the basic guideline requirements of providing for clarity, completeness, and accuracy which were the main concerns of the NRC's 1984 assessment report.7 Also the Licensee completed the TSUP using the Licensee's guidelines and those of the NRC (see Appendix A of this report for a listing of the specific guidelines) . The Licensee's TSUP has significantly improved the TS in areas covered by the guidelines as follows: (1) There is now a well defined mode structure to which applicability of the specifications are made, • (2) The Limiting Conditions for Operations have been clarified to identify and distinguish between the specifications and action statements to be taken if the limiting condition is exceeded, (3) Each LCO has a corresponding surveillance which describes acceptance criteria sufficient to verify compliance with the LCO. (4) The technical specifications were clarified so that they were unambiguous with a singular interpretation, (5) The technical specifications were clarified and expanded to assure accuracy, completeness, and consistency with existing design and safety analysis documentation, (6) Bases for the specifications and surveillances were clarified and expanded, 164 • (7) The content of the technical specifications was guided by requirements of ANSI/ANS Standard 58.4, 10CFR, the Standard Review Plan, Generic letters 83-36, 37, 84.15, 87-09, and 88-06, the STS. and considerations unique to Fort St. Vrain as embodied in the existing licensing basis in the FSAR. (8) The overall structure and format of the technical specifications was upgraded to that of the Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors (Draft Revision 5 of the STS) . The review performed of the TSUP was done consistent with the Licensee and NRC guidelines (see Appendix A for a list of the guidelines). The FSV upgraded technical specifications were compared in detail to the existing FSV technical specifications, the Draft Revision 5 of the Standard Technical Specifications, and the FSV FSAR. Also, comparisons were made as necessary to 10 CFR, the Standard Review Plan, and NRC Generic Letters 83-36, 37, 84-15, 87.09, and 88-06. The review was to detect any differences from the referenced requirements documents and guidelines. The first priority was to ensure that the content of the existing FSV technical specifications were carried over to the TSUP. Deletions or relaxations from the existing FSV technical specifications were justified by the Licensee by added safety analyses and or specific justifications. Although the Licensee had not committed to justify differences from the STS, the Licensee voluntarily added a large number of specifications from the STS that were not in the existing FSV technical specifications. Also, as a result of NRC Staff concerns, the Licensee committed to adapting a large number of other STS specifications. In the area of safety related cooling functions (helium circulators, helium circulator auxiliaries, steam generators, PCRV liner cooling system, safe shutdown cooling water supply, boiler feed pumps, and condensate pumps) the FSV FSAR was thoroughly reviewed by ORNL and a functional comparison made to the cooling function requirements of the STS and the General Design 165 Criteria (Appendix A of 10 CFR S0). As a result of this cooling function comparison, there were a large number of new requirements added to the FSV technical specifications. Ongoing reviews of other FSV technical specifications issues were investigated outside the scope of the TSUP. These other issues outside the scope of the TSUP were the Plant Protective System, the implementation of Generic Letters 83-36, 37 post-TMI action items requiring technical specifications, the implementation of Generic Letter 84-15 on emergency diesel generator reliability, the review of recent electrical equipment modifications, the implementation of Generic Letter 87-09 on the general applicability and surveillance requirements, and implementation of Generic Letter 88.06 on removal of organization charts. These issues outside the scope of the TSUP were reviewed based on the guidelines contained in the Generic Letters themselves. The Plant Protective System review was done based on the objective of incorporating instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpoint and the allowable value of the Limiting Safety System Settings. As such these reviews were not limited to the narrow guidelines of the TSUP. In many cases, the reviews of these issues outside the scope of the TSUP were done on the applicable sections in the TSUP because the associated TSUP sections often were more complete in complying with the desired requirements. In other cases, the issues outside the scope of the TSUP were reviewed using separate licensee amendment application submittals and then when approved, the material was reformatted to the STS format and inserted into the TSUP. The review of the Licensee's TSUP generated a large number of NRC Staff concerns that were negotiated with the Licensee on an item by item basis. The negotiation process involved many iterations of licensee submittals, NRC reviews, meetings, and teleconferences. The tracking of these concerns (Table 2.2 of this report) was done in comment form. Table 2.2 identified the references for comment documentation to the Licensee, comment categorization and comment disposition. Because of the complexity of the upgrade program, differences in direction taken by the Licensee and the NRC Staff were resolved through high level management meetings between PCS 166 personnel and the NRC. Resolution to the differences was then accomplished item by item by a mutual categorizing of the comments as either within or outside the scope of the TSUP. Subcategories were defined for comments within the scope of the TSUP and the comments were then tracked until they were dispositioned to an acceptable resolution. Finally, presented in Section 3 of this report was the section by section evaluation of the TSUP which summarized the basis for the acceptability of each section. Acceptability of the TSUP was based in large part on precedent as established by: (1) specification carryover from the existing TS, (2) specification adaptation from the STS, or (3) conversion of interim TS amendments. Thus the acceptability of the TSUP for sections in the above categories of based on precedent, did not require any extensive technical evaluation. For another large part of the TSUP, however, the acceptance was based on detailed evaluation of considerations unique to gas cooled reactor technology and involved extensive technical evaluation based on the FSV FSAR and on considerations of light water reactor technology in 10 CFR, the STS. SRP, and Generic Letters 83-36, 37, 84-15, 87-09, and 88-06. The Licensee's amendment proposal resulting from the TSUP represents an in-depth upgrading that added a substantial number of new requirements. Thus the FSV technical specification upgrade is not merely a format structural reorganization that maps the existing technical specification content into the format of the STS. About 15 percent of the proposed technical specifications are new having been identified from one of the following considerations: - Requirements derived from the existing licensing basis of the FSAR but which had not been implemented in the existing technical 167 specifications. Many new technical specifications in the safety related cooling functions and reactivity control area were identified in this way. The safety related cooling functions included the helium circulators, helium circulator auxiliaries, steam generators, PCRV Cooling System, and safe shutdown cooling water supply system. - Requirements in the Standard Technical Specifications that Public Service Company of Colorado voluntarily committed to for the first time. The Design Features Section 5 and the Administrative Control Section 6 were considerably expanded to accommodate most of the STS requirements in these areas. Accounting of instrumentation inaccuracy between the trip setpoint and the allowable value for most of the Limiting Safety System Settings. - Significant revision to Section 3/4.0, Limiting Conditions for Operation and Surveillance Requirements, to reflect the guidance in Generic Letter 87-09, Sections 3.0 and 4.0 of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) on the Applicability of Limiting Conditions for Operation and Surveillance Requirements." - Significant revision to Section 3/4.8, Auxiliary Electric Power Systems, to reflect the guidance in Generic Letter 84-15, "Proposed Staff Actions to Improve and Maintain Diesel Generator Reliability" and to implement the requirements for the electrical equipment modifications made such as those of Building 10 and those of the Alternate Cooling Method diesel generator. - Added requirements on post-accident sampling, long term auxiliary feedwater system equivalent, noble gas effluent monitoring, high-range radiation monitor, and control room habitability requirements to meet the guidance of Generic Letters 83-36, 37, "NUREG-0737 Technical Specifications." 168 - Added requirements in the fire protection specifications to implement requirements from Generic Letter 86-10, "Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements," and from 10 CFR 50 Appendix R. Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979." - A new mode structure based on the settings of the Interlock Sequence Switch and the Reactor Mode Switch. - A new demarcation criteria of Calculated Bulk Core Temperature of 760'F (CBCT) for when system redundancy is required and for implementing action statements. - Added specifications on the rod control system and actions to take on rod control system partial inoperability. Thus considerable effort and resources were expended by the Licensee to address the areas of completeness and accuracy of the technical specifications. Although the reviews made of the TSUP uncovered continuing areas of concern in the reactor protection system, reactivity control system, safety related cooling functions, and other systems, the improvements made in the TSUP have greatly enhanced the clarity, completeness. and accuracy of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications. As the Licensee's amendment application constitutes a major improvement toward the goals and requirements set forth in the Commission's October 16, 19847 assessment report in the area of technical specification improvement, the amendment application is judged acceptable. The remaining issues have been identified in the various activities that paralleled the TSUP and in the NRC Staff comments made on the TSUP itself. The NRC Staff comments, Table 2.2 of this report, have identified a significant number of comments that were categorized as "further discussion possible but not in the scope of the TSUP," (see Section 1.4 of this report). The investigation of these concerns categorized as not in the scope of the TSUP, may be the subject of 169 future separate NRC Staff licensing actions. In large part, these areas of concern were on the lack of adequate physics information in the FSAR to support existing technical specifications in the areas of reactivity control , power peaking, trip setpoint bypasses, RWP setpoints, and flow requirements. 170 TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECT10N5 COPMENT CAt(GORIIATIONS, DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION _. ___. Re Terence for Reference for Comment - Comment Categorization Nem Section Existing Conment Connentil Documentation Disposition in the ESOP _ IS Section Section Abbreviated Title _ Identification Categorization to licensee_ Documentation Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents Index E 13 II 1.0 2.0 Definitions DEF I.II D. A 13 11, 15 DEF 1.11 D, B 13 14, 15 OFF 1.16 1. AN, A, 11. 25 It. 25, 26 AAA DEF 1.11 A, A 11 14, IS DEF. 1.22 E 13 it, IS DEF 1.24 A. A 11 14, IS e-• DEF 1.29 At, A 25 25, 26 H e+ DEF 1.34 A, A 21 22, 23 Response F 13 14 Ilea Slave lest E 11 14 Table 1.01 CO, Al, At, 13, 21 14, IS, 19, B,AI,A 22, 28. 30 Table 1.1 ALB, ANS, 118 21 22, 23, 28 2.1.1 3.1 Reactor Core Safety Limit 51 2.1.1-1 B 13 11, IS I A 13 14, IS J A, A 13 11, 15 4 A 13 14, 15 S B, C 13, 21 it, IS, 2 SL 2.1.1 AP, A 26 26, I St 2.1.1 Basis Al. A 27 27. 3 P.2-? St 2.1.1 Basis Al, A 27 27. 3 P.2.1 2.2.1 3.3 Limiting Safety System Settings (Outside Scope of 15UP, see Section 1.6.1) 1 I I I I . I TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECO.1(41108 SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS. OISPOSIIION AND DOCUMENTATION __ Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section (elating Comment Coementls Documentation Disposition in the 75UP IS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to licensee Documentation 3.0.3 None (CO Applicability o1 Inoperable O. 8 20. 20, 55 Batteries 3.0/4.0 4.0/5.0 Applicability LCO 3.0-1 E 11 it 2 1 24 1 D, A 14. 15 4 A. A 14, 15 5 0, A 14, 15 LCO 3.0 A 21 22 LCO 4.0,1 Al, A 25 25. 1 LCO 3.0.2 8 25 25 LCO 3.0.5 AP, Al. A 25 25, 26. 1 3/4.1.1 3/4.1.1 Control Rod Pair Operability 103 3,1.1.1 Al, A 13, 21 14, 15. 19. 29 ,,,, (leterl. TS) 2 A. 8, f 13 14, 15. v 3 B 13 14, 15 no 4 A 13 14, 15 S A 13 14, 1S 6 $ 13 14, 15 7 6 13 14, 15 8 A 1l 14, 15 9 C 13 14. IS, 2 10 8, f 13 14, IS 11 8 13 L4, IS 12 8 13 14. IS 13 f 13 14. 15 14 8 13 14, IS 11 6 13 14, 15 16 A t3 11, IS SA0 3.1.1/ SR 4.1.1.4 Al, A 26 26, 1 (C0 3.1.1 Al, A 26 26, 1 LCO 3.1.1 Af, A 21 21, 3 Actions 3/4.1.2.1 3/4.1.2 Rod Position Indicators-0perating LCD 3.1.2.1-1 8 13 14, 15 (Interim 75) 2 6 13 14, IS 3 8 13 14, 15 4 8 13 II, IS S F 13 14, 15 6 8 13 14. IS 1 B 11 14. 15 8 f Ti 14. IS ■ • I r U IABIE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION S£CIION5 CO MINI CATEGORIZATIONS, DISPOSITION AND DOCIAIENTAIUON Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Ealsting Convent Cammenttl Documentation Disposition in the ISW IS Section Section Abbreviated title Identification Categorization to licensee_ Documentation_ 3/4.1.2.2 314.1.3 Rod Position Indicators-Shutdown IC0 3.1.2.2-1 B ii I4, 15 (Interim r5) 2 B 13 14. LS 3 8 it 14, IS 4 F 13 14, 15 5 r 13 14, IS 6 8 13 14. 15 7 r 13 14, 15 8 B 13 14, 15 9 6 13 14, IS 10 8 Il 14. IS II 6 13 14, 15 12 A 13 14, IS 13 8 13 14. 15 5/4.1.3 3/4.1.4 Shutdown margin LCO 3.1.3-1 B 13 II, IS ... (InterlN TS) 2 4, A. B 11 11, 15 Cu 3 B 13 14, 15 4 A 13. 21 14. IS, 29 5 r 13 14, IS 6 8 13 14. IS 7 B 13 14, i5 8 A 13, 21 14, 15. 29 9 6 13 14, 15 10 F 13 14. L5 LCO 3.1.3 6 21 21 3/4.1.4.1 3/4.1.5 Rod Worths and Positions-Operating (CO 3.1.4.1-1 A 13 14, 15 (later]• r5) 2 6 13 14, IS 3 A 13 14. 15 4 6 13 14, Is S B 13 14, IS 6 8 Il 14. 15 7 r 13 14, 15 8 A 13 14, 15 • 9 A 13 14. 15 10 r 13 14. IS 1A6LC 2.2 1(CI?IICA1 SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZAIION5. DISPOSITION AND DOCCrIENTAtION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Comrentsl Documentation Disposition In the 19.10 IS Section _ Section Abbreviated Fi lie Identification Categorization to licensee Documentation 3/4.1.4.2 3(4.1.6 Rod Worths and Positions-Shutdown LCO 3.1.4.2-1 8 11 14, 15 (Interim TS) 2 8 Il 14, IS 3 A 13 14. IS 4 4 11 II, IS 5 8 13 14, 15 6 A 13 14, 15 7 F 13 14, LS 8 F 1) 14, IS 9 F 13 14, 15 3/4.1.5 3/4.1.7 Reactivity vs temperature LC0 3.1.5-1 F I1 14, IS (Interim 15) 2 F 13 14, 15 3 1 13 24, 15 a.., ICO 3.1.5 F 24 24 p LC0 3.1.5-8asls 0, A 27 27, 3 3(4.1.6 3/4.1.8 Shutdown System (CO 1.1.6-1 D, Al, Al. A 13 14, IS. 19, 1 (Pedeairated (interim f5) 2 I I3 II, 15 3/4.7.6.1) 4 A 11 14, 15 S A, Al, A 13 14, 15. 19 6 A 21 29 LC0 3.1.6 A 25 1 3/4.1.6.2 4.1.6/5.1.2 Reserve Shutdown System-Shutdown 3.1.6-6 0. A 21 22, 29 1.1.6 pasts Al, D. A 25 25, 27, 3 3/4.1.1 4.1.8/5.1.4 Reactivity Status lCO 3.1.7-1 8 13 14. 15 2 F 13 14, 15 3 F 13 14, 15 4 A 13 14, 15 S F 1) 14, 15 6 F 11 24, 15 7 F 13 14, IS 8 f 13 14, IS 4 F 1) 14, 1S 10 A 13 14. 15 3/4.2 NA Power Peaking Limits Sectfon 3(4.2-t F 17 22, 28 2 F li 22, 28 TABLE 2.2 (ECNRICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COfNERT CATEGOPI1AE10NS, O'50051110N ANO 000LMENTATIOM -- Deference for Deference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Comnentii Documentation Oisposftion In the ISUP IS Section Section Abbreviated Title __ Identification Categorization to Licensee Oacumentaticn_ 3/4.2.1 4.1.1 Core Irradiation 1(0 3.2.1-1 A 13 II, 15 2 F (3 14, 15 3 f 11 14. 15 4 F 13 14, 15 3/4.2.2 4.1.7 Core Inlet Orifice Valves LCO 3.2.2-I 8 13 14, 15 2 F 17 14, 15 3 8 13 14, 15 Figure 3.2.2-1 C 26 I, 2 3/4.2.3 4.1.7/5.1.7 Comparison Regions LCO 3.2.3.1 B 13 14, 15 2 F 13 14, l5 3 F 13 14, 15 3/4.2.4 4.1.9/5.1.5 MlmSmom flow LCO 3.2.1 A 25 1, 26 '-a v 3/4.2.6 3.1/5.1.6 Power-To-Flow Patio (CO 3.2.6-1 F II 14, 15 2 8 11 11, 15 (CO 3.2.6 Al, A 21 27. 3 Figure 3.2.6-2 At, A 27 27, 3 3/1.3.1 4.4.115.4.1 Plant Protective System (Outside scope of ISUP, see Section 1.6.1) Basis 3.3.1 Al, A 21 21, 3 3/4.3.1.5 4/5.4.5 Ond4rvoltaf4 Relays Time Delay I. AI(PPS1 20 20, 8 3/4.3.2.1 4.4.5/5.4.IZ Analytical Moisture Monitors 1(0 3.3.2.1-1 0, A 11 14, 15 2 A. 8 11 14, I5 3 B 13 14, 15 1(0 3.3.2.1.0 A/. A 23 27, 3 3/4.3.2.2 4.4.3/$.4.9 Padlitlon Monitoring (CO 3.3.2.2.1 D. AAA, AA )3 II. IS, 19 Instrumentation 2 I. 8 13 14, 15 (CO 3.3.2.2 0e, 4 21 27 (CO 3.3.2.2.2.C. 8 27 27 3/1.3.2.3 4.4.4/5.4.10 54ismlc Instruments LCO 3.3.2.3.1 A, At, A 13 14, 15, 19 2 A 13 le, 15 3 A, 0', A 13, 21 14. 15, 19, 29 4 A, A10'. 4/0', 13. It II, IS, 19, 22 0'. AI, AI, Al. 23, 29, 1 A 3/4.3.2.4 New Meteorological Instruments LCO 3,3.2,4 A 13 II. )5 IABIf 2.2 1ECKKSCAL SPECIFICAISON SECTIONS COItitN1 CAIEGOR1/Al IONS. DISPOSITION ANO 00CIMFMIA7IOM Peference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Emitting Comment Commentss Documentation Disposition in the TSt7P IS Section Section Abbreviated litle Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation 3/4.3.2.5 4.10.3/5.4.2 Fire Detection and Alarm hone 3/4.3.2.6 None/5.4.14 Chlorine Detection and Alarm System (Outside scope of 15W, see Section 1.6.2) 3/4.1.2.7 None/S.4.8 Power-To-Flow Instruments LC0 1.3.2.7.1 B 11 14, IS 2 0, Al, A 13 14, IS, 19 3 D, Al. A 13 14, 15, 19 . 4 f I3 14, 15 3/4.3.2.8 New Core Outlet Thereoco.Ples (C0 3.3.2.8.1 A 13 14, IS 2 0. AO. A 13 14, 15. 19 3 A 13 14, 15 4 A 13 14, 15 3/4.3.3 4.4.2/S.4.1 three Room Control Coaplea LCO 3.3.3 A, A 13 14, 15 Deleted 4.9.1 Fuel loading and Initial Rise-to-Power Os Deleted 5.4.6 Core Delta P Indicator Deleted 5.10.5 Breathing Air System 3/4.4 Ill Primary Coolant System Section 3/4.4-1 De. I. 6 II 22, 28, 53 2 FAO, TAI, FA 11 22, 23. 28 3 D' 17 22, 28, 51 4 6, F 11 22. 28, 53 S F I7 22, 28 • 6 A 11 22. 28 Primary Coolant Primary Coolant-1 E 13 14. IS 2 f 13 14, 15 3 f 13 14, 15 3/4.4.1 4.2.8/5.2.6. Primary Coolant Activity LCO 3.4.1-1 F 13 14, 15 (Redesignated 5.2.11 2 f 13 14, IS 3/4.4.2) 3 F 13 14, 15 4 B 13 14, IS 5 8 II 14. IS 6 A 11 14, 15 3/4.4.2 4.2.10/11.2.12 Primary Coolant Impurities (C0 3.4.2-1 I 13 14, 15 (Redesignated -Above 1200°F 2 8 13 14, IS 3/4.4.3) 3 A 13 14. IS TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMM CAT(GORliAT10NS, DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Com,entit Documentation Disposition in the TSUP IS Section Section Abbreviated title Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation 3/4.4.3 4.2.11/S.2.12 Primary Coolant Impurities LCO 3.4.3-1 f I) 14, IS _ (Redesignated -8elow 12104F 2 8 13 I1, IS 3/4.4.1) 3 8 I) II. IS 4 A II 14. 15 3/4.5 M Safe Shutdown Cooling Systems Section 3/4.5 8 17 22, 28 3/4.5.1.1 4.2.1, Operable Loops - LCO 3.5.1.1-1 A 17 22, 28 (Split 4.2.2, Above 760°F 2 A 11 72, 78 Into 4.2.3, 3 A 17 22, 28 3/4.5.1.1, 4.3.1. 4 A. B 17 22, 28 3/4.5.2.1. 5.2.7, 5 A 17 22, 28 and 5.2.8, 6 A 17 22, 28 314.5.3.1) 5.2.9, 7 At, Al. A 17 22, 23. 28 v5.2.23, 8 A 11 22, 28 5.2.27, 9 A 17 22, 28 5.3.70, l0 8 17 22. 28 6.3.11, I1 8 I7 22, 28 5.3.12 12 A 17 22, 28 13 A 17 22, 28 14 A 11 22, 28 17 8 17 22, 28 16 A/, 8 U 22, 28 I? 8 17 22, 28 18 A 11 22, 28 19 AI,F I? 22, 28 20 8 I? 22, 28 21 A 17 22, 28 22 8 17 22, 28 23 1 li 22, 28 24 8 17 22, 28 LCO 3.5.1.1-1 A 27 22, ZS 2 A 21 22, 28 3 f. 21 22, 28 4 Al. A/, A 2i 22. 23. 28 S Al, A/. A 2i 22, 23. Ili SR 4.5.1.1 8 I7 22, 28 I I I I i i II I I I I , 1 i IM TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS, OISPOSIUION AND DOCIM(NTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Coanenl Conanentll Documentation Disposition in the MP TS Section Section Abbreviated Title identification Categorittion to Licensee Documentation 3/4.5.1.2 None Operable Loops 1C0 3.5.1.2-I Al. Al. A I7 22, 23. 28 (Split into -Below 760°F 2 A 17 22, 28 3/4.5.1.2. 3 Al. AO, A 17 22, 23, 28 3/4.5.2.2, 4 A, 8 II 22, 28 and 3/4.5.3.2) 5 A, 6 17 22, 28 LCO 3.5.1.2-1 A 21 22, 28 2 Al. Al, A6 21 22, 23, 28 3 A. 8 21 22, 28 4 A/. A/, A 21 22, 23, 28 S A 21 22, 28 3/4.5.2.1 8.2.2, Circulator Auxiliaries LCO 3.5.2.1.c Al. A, A 25 25. 1 4.2.3/ LCO 3.5.2.1.d Al, A, A 25 25, 1 5.2.8, 5.2.9, Co 5.2.23. 5.2.27 3/4.5.3.1 4.3.4/ Supply Headers - LCO 3.5.3.1-1 Al. A. A 21 22, 28. 1 (Redeslgaated 5.2.7 Above 760'F 2 A. 6 21 22, 28 3/4.5.4.1) 3/4.5.1.2 None Supply Leaders - tC0 3.5.3.2-1 A1, A 21 22, 28 (Redesignated Below 76O0f 2 A 21 22, 28 . 3/4.5.4.2) 3 A 21 22, 28 4 A, 8 21 22, 28 3/4.5.4 4.2.6/ Safe Shutdown Water Supply 1C0 3.5.4-1 a 13 14. IS (Redesignated 5.2.10. 2 A 13 14. IS 3/4.5.5) 5.2.24 3 8 13 14, 15 415 5 r 13 14, 15 1(0 3.5.4 A/. A 21 22, 28 3/4.6.1.1 4.2.7/ PCRV Safety Valves 1(0 3.6.1.1.1 8 13 14, 15 5.2.E 2 8 13 Ii. IS 3 8 13 11. IS 4 8 13 1:. Is TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS. DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION ---------�------- ---Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Conmenti, Documentation Disposition In the 1SUP TS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to licensee Oocume9Ution 3/4.6.1.2 4.2.7/5.2.1 Penetration Overpressure Protection 1r.0 3.6.1.2-1 I3 IC, 15 2 11 II, 15 3 II II, 15 4 13 14, 15 S 13 14, 15 6 13 14, 15 7 I3 14. 15 3/4.6.1.3 4.2.7/5.2.15 Interspace Kin. Pressure LCO 3.6.1.3-1 13 14. 15 2 13 I1, IS 3 13 14, 15 3/4.6.1.4 4.2.9/ PCRV Closure Leakage LCO 3.6.1.4-1 13 14. 15 5.2.16.a. 2 13 14, IS 5.2.16.4 3 13 14. 1S ..e 4 13 14, 15 so 3/4.6.1.5 None Steam Generator Interspace Radiation 1(0 3.6.1.5.1 , A 13 14, IS Monitoring 2 , A 13 14, 1S 3 , A 13 14, 15 4 . A 13 14, 15 3/4.6.2.1 4.2.13. PCRV Liner Cooling System - 1(0 3.6.2.1-1 17 22, 28 4.2.14/ Above 760°F 2 I1 22, 28 5.4.4, 3 11 72, 28 5.4.11 4 IT 22, 28 5 11 22, 28 (CO 3.6.2.1-a1 B 25 25. 1 SR 4.6.2.1.6 Al, A 25, 26 26, 1 3/4.6.2.2 Mon, PCRV Liner Cooling System - (CO 3.6.2.2-I 8 17 28 Below 7604F 2 8 17 22, 28 3 B IT 28 (C0 3.6.2.2-i B 21 22, 28 2 At, A 21 22, 28 3 F 21 28 4 A 21 22, 28 3/4.6.3 4.2.15/ PCRV Temperatures [C0 3.6.3-1 A. 8 I1 22, 28 5.4.4, 2 B Il 22, 28 5.4.5 3 F I) 22, 28 Sea TAKE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS, DISPOSIIION AND DOCUMENTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Commentll Documentation Disposition In the TSUP 15 Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee DocumentationI, 3/1.6.4 None/5.2.2, PC44 Integrity LCO 3.6.4-1 0, At, C 13 14, 15, 19 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 2 0, At, At, f 13, 21 14, IS, 19, 22 5.2.5, 5.2.13, 3 0, A 13 14, 15 5.2.14, 5.2.16, 4 0, A 13 14, 15 5.2.24.1,. 5 0, A 13 14, IS 5.2.28 6 0, At, A 13 14. IS, 19 7 0, B 13 14, 15 8 0, A 13 14, 15 9 0, A 13 14, 15 LEO 3.6.4.1 A 26 1 LCD 3.6.4.2 A 25 1 3/4.6.5.! 4.5.1/5.5.1 Reactor Building Integrity LCD 3.6.5.1-1 0, B 13 II. 15 2 D. O'A1.68 13 II, 15, 19, 21 .5 3 0, B 13 I/, IS OD O 4 0. Al, A 13 II, IS, 19 Si 0, AI, A 13 II, 15, 19 6 0, Al. A 13 II, 15, 19 3/4.6.5.2 4.5.1/5.3.3 Reactor Building Cxhaust IC0 3.6.5.2-1 0, MO'. BB 13 14, 15. 19, 21 2 0, B 13 14, 15 3 0. A 13 14, 15 4 0, B 13 14, 1S S 0, B 13 14, 5 6 B 13 14 7 0, Al, A 13 14, IS, 19 8 D, 8 13 14, IS 9 D, C 13 II. IS 10 D. 8 13 14, IS 11 D. Al, A 13 14, IS, It 12 0, Al. A 13 14, IS, 19 3/4.6.5.2 4.6.Ic.l A. S. Cxhaust Fans Operability 0. 8 20 20. SS 3/4.6.5.3 4.S.I/S.S.2 Reactor Building Overpressure LCD 3.6.5.3-7 0, C 13 14, 15 2 0, Al, A I) 14, 15. 19 3/4.7 N/A Plant and Safe Shutdown Cooling 3/4.7-I BAN. BAR, 8A 17 ?2. 28, 1 Support Systems 2 8 17 22. 28 TABLE 2.2 TEDNICAL SPECIFICATION stcrioNs COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS. 015P051110N AND DOCUMENTATION Re Ter cote for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Ed sting (cement Commentlt Documentation Disposition In the TSOP 15 Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation 1/4.7.1.1 1.3.2/ Boller Feed Pumps 1C0 3.7.1.1-1 8 13 14, 15 5.2.) 2 A/, 0'. B I3 14, 15. 23 3 D, Al, A 13 14. IS. 19 LCO 3.7.1.1.1 AI, B 11 28 2 A 11 28 3 A 1T 28 8 F IT 28 5 6 17 28 LCO 3.7.1.1 A, II 21 28 LCO 3.7.1.1 8 27 27 W 3/4.7.1.2 None Steam Water Duals [C0 3.7.1.2-1 0, A1, A 13 14. 15. I9 a-. 2 D. C 13 14. 15 3 D, Al. A 13 14, 15. 19 4 0, A 13 14, 15 5 0. C 13 11, 15 6 0, A 13 14, IS 1 0, 8 13 14. IS 8 0, a 13 11, IS 9 0, A 13 II. IS [C0 3.1.12 a, Al. IA 17 22, 28 3/4.7.1.3 None/5.1.1 Pressure Relief Pelves 1(0 3.7.1.3-1 A 11 It, 15 2 C 13 19, 2 3/8.7.1.4 8.3.8/5.1.7 Secondary Coolant Activity (CO 1.7.1.4-1 0, ABS 13 14, 15 3/4.7.1.5 Nine/S.3.9 Safety Valves - Operating [C0 3.7.1.5 A 17 22. 28 . LCO 3.).1.5 Al. A 21 21. 3 Action a 1C0 3.1.1.5 Al, A 21 21. 1 Oasis 3/4.1.1.6 None Safety Valves - Shutdown LCO 3.7.1.6 1 17 22, 28 1C0 3.7.1.6 A, 8 21 22. 28 TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS. DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization - New Section Existing foment Comnentll Documentation Oisposition in the ISUP IS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee Docur.entatiea 3/4.1.2 4.3.7/S.3.5 Hydraulic Power System LCO 3.7.2-1 0, C 13 I4, 15 2 0, BC 13 LI, l5 3 0, C 13 14, 15 4 0, 6, A 11 14, 15, 22 5 B I3 IC 6 0, Al, C 13 14. IS, 19 7 0, 6 II 14, IS 6 0, 6 13 14, IS 9 0, 6 13 14, 15 10 0, 6 13 14, 15 - II 0, 6 13 II, 1S 3/4.7.3 4.3.6/5.3.6 Instrument Air System LEO 3.7.3-1 D, C 13 14, IS 2 0, A 11 14, 15 .... 1C0 3.1.3 6, 6 Il 22, 23 ro N 3!4.1.6 4.2.4/5.2.24.e Service Water System LCO 3.7.4.1/2-I 2 6 U. A 13 14. IS, 19 2 6 13 14, 35 I 6 1) 14, 15 4 8 13 14, 15 LCD 3.7.4.1 E 27 - 27 tC0 3.7.4.2 A 21 22, 28 )/4.7.5 4.2.12, PCR9 Depressurization LCO 3.7.S-I 6 13 14, 15 4.2.11/ 2 0, MM., AM 13 II, IS, 19 , 5.2.24.g l A 13 II, IS LCO 3.7.5 8 11 22, 28 SR 4.5.5.1/ SR 4.6.2.1.c Al. A 26 26,1 (Included In TS 3(4.6.4.11 5R 4.7.5 A 26 I, 26 3/4.7.6.2 4.10.675.10.1 Carbon Dioxide Systems (CO 3.7.6.2-I D. C 13 II, IS 2 0, A 13 14, IS 3 0, A 13 14, IS 3/4.1.6.3 4.10.2/S.10.2 Halon System LCO 3.1.6,3-1 D, C 11 14, IS 2 0, C 13 14, IS 3 0, D", 0. 0. A 13 14.15,21,22,29 4 0, Al, A 13 14, IS, 19 Basis 3.7.6.3 6 21 27 TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICAIIOC SECTIONS COMMENT CA1(GORIZATIONS, DISp051110N AND 0XIMENIAMION (continued) Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section [slating torment Conmentll Documentation Disposition In the ;SOP IS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation 3/4.7.6.4 4.10.7/5.10.8 Fire Hose Stations LCO 3.7.6.1-1 C 13 I! 2 0, Al, A 13 14, 15. 19 3/4.7.6.5 4.10.8/5.10.9 yard Fire Hydrants UC0 3.7.6.5 A, A II 14. 15 3/4.7.8 None SLR015 NRC Action 3 Al. A 21 1, 22 LCO 3.1.8 Al, A 2S 1. 25 3/4.7.9 None Control Room Emergency Ventilation LCO 3.7.9-1 0. 8 13 14, IS 2 D. Al, A 13 14. 15. 19 3 0. 0'. B 13 14. 15. 21 4 D. 8 13 i/, 15 5 0. A 13 14. 15 ✓ 6 D, C 13 14, l5 w 7 0, 6 13 Ie. 15 8 0, B 13 It, 15 3/4.7.10 4.3.10/5.3.1 Snubbers 1(0 3.7.10-1 0, C 13 14, 15 2 0, A 13 14. I5 3 0. A, A 13. 21 14. 15. 22 4 0. A 13 14. IS 5 D. A 13 14, IS 6 D. C 13 14, IS 3.7.10 lasts Al. A 25 25, 1 Figure 3.8.1.1 Nome Olasel Fuel Schematic Miscellaneous Al, A 16 16, SS Changes 3.8.1.1 None Otfslte Power 'or Both' A', A 16 16, 55 Actions1 Diesel Generator Generic Letter 0'. 6 16 16. 55 84-1S Requirements 3.8.1.1 Action d 4.6.11.6 Safe Shutdown Equipment Operability 0, B 20 20. SS Diesel Generator Shutdown Cooling At, A 24 24. 31 Capacity 1. Adapted from Generic letter 84-IS. TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SEC1f0NS COMMENT CATEGORIZATIONS, DISPOSITION ANO DOCUMENTATION P eterenct for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Lusting Comment Co mentii Documentation Olspcsition in the ESOP ES Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation Actions f,g None Diesel Generator Out of Tolerance 0'. 0', 0', 8 16 16, 55. 23, 24 Fuel 3.8.1.16 4.6.1[.6 Diesel Generator Operability D. B 20 20, 55 3.8.1.16.2 Mono Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Al, A 16 16. SS Requirements 3.8.1.16.4 None Diesel Lubricating Oil Storage 0. A 20 20. SS Requirements -- 4.6.19 fuel 011 [20,000 gal Shutdown C, 8 " 16 16, 2 Auxiliary Boilers 3.8.1.1,02 4.6.1.26.5 Oiesel Auuillary Support Starting Alt D, Cl, 8 20 20, 55, 23 A and Boiler Fuel Pomp' 3.8.1.2 Action a None Shutdown Action Statement Core Alt/Control 0, 8 20 20, 55 Rod lbvetent 3.8.[.26 4.6.1.16 Diesel Auxiliary Support Starting Air D, 8 20 20, 55 Capacity test 3.8.2.3 Action b None Inoperable Battery Charger Restoration A, 8, Al, A 20 20, 55, 24, 31 and Associated battery Bank 3.8.2.1 Action 4.6.1a Inoperable battery fqualizing 0, Da, 0', A 20 20, 55, 23, 11 Charge Waiver 3.8.2.1 Action b 4.6.1 Battery Operability line to 0, B 20 20, SS Establish 3.8.2.16 None Dedicated Battery Charger Clarify Al, A 16 16, SS Nomenclature 3.8.2.2 Action a 4.6.1 Inoperable Battery Equalizing 0, D', 0', A 16 16, 55 Charge Valve, Operable OC Electric.) Source Should Not Al. A 16 16. 55 Affect Independence . a I l • TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS CONNEMI CATEGORIZATIONS. DJSP051II0N AND DOCUMENTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Comment's Documentation Disposition in th. TSUP IS Section Section Abbreviated litle Identification Categorization to licensee Documentation_ 3.8.2,2 Action b None Inoperable Battery Charger Restoration D. B 20 20, 55 and Associated Battery Bank Associated Inverter and Definition Al, A 16 16. SS Battery Bank 3.8.3.1 None Power Distribution Tie Breakers D. A 20 20, 5S 3.8.3.1 Action b None Power Oistrlbutlon Instrument 0, A 20 20. 55 Power Backup 3.8.3.1 Action c 4.6.1 Power 0lstribution Equalising D. 0a. 0'. A 20 20. 55, 23, 31 Charge Limits 3.8,3.1 4.6.1 Power Distribution Bus 0. B 20 20, 55 Energltation CO e^ 3.8.3.1 4.6.1c.2 Power 0istrlbution 4160 V bus 0, B 20 20. SS Operability 1.8.3.26 4.6.1f Power Distribution 120 Vac vital 0, B 20 20, S5 buses 3/4.7.8 ACt Diesel Generator LCO 3.7.8-1 Al, Al, A 17 22. 28. 31 (11adastgnated 2 Al, Al, A Jr 22. 28, 31 3/4.8.4) 3 1 17 22, 28 4 I 17 22, 28 4.6.1.1.1► None 0(fsite AC Power Shutdown Testing D, A 20 20, 55 4.8.1.1.2c Nona Diesel Foal Oil Surveillance 0, D, B, 8 20 20, SS, 23, 24 Testing ACM Day Tank Al, 8 16 16, SS 4.8.1.1.24 None Diesel Alr Start Receiver Capacity Check AR, 8 16 16. 55 4.8.1.1.2..4 5.6.1.24.1 Olesel Surveillance Testing toad Rejection 0, A 20 20, 55 4.8.1.1.2..5 5.6.16 Diesel Surveillance Testing Auto Start Test D. A 20 20. SS Auto Start lime Al, 0', Al. A. 8 16 16, 55, 23. 24. 31 Limit ssi , TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COMtlNT CATEGORIZATIONS. DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Foisting Comment Cocnent4t Documentation Disposition in the TSIIP TS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee_ Documentation 4.8.1.1.2e.1 None Diesel Surveillance Testing Restoration of 0, A 20 20, 55 Offsite Power 4.8.L1.2a.9 4.6.1.1b Diesel Aucillary Support Starting Air D, 5 20 20. SS Capacity Test 4,8.1.1.20.9 None Diesel Surveillance Testing toad Sequence 0, A 20 20, SS Timer Table 4.8.1-11 None Diesel Surveillance Testing Testing 0, A 20 20. 55 frequency Table 4.6.1.21 None Diesel Surveillance Testing Reporting 0, A 20 20. SS Co Requirements cm c' 4.8.2.1i 5.6.2a/b OC Surveillance Weekly/Cell D. 8 20 20. 55 Temperature 4.8.2.1b.2 4.8.2.1b.2 DC Surveillance Quarterly/ 0. A 20 20, 5S Visible Corrosion 4.8.2.10 5.6,2c DC Surveillance Refuel/C 0, A 20 20, 55 Capacity Cell Terminal 0, 0e, Da, 6 20 20, 55, 23. 31 Resistance 4.8.2.14 5.6.2c OC Surveillance Batter Capacity 0, 1, Al 20 20, 55. 24 Test . Batter Charger Al, A, Al 16 20, 55. 24 load Test Table 4.8.2.1 None Satter Surveillance Requirements Electrolyte Al, 0, A 16, 20 16, 20, 55 level 4.8.3.1 None Power Distribution Open Tie D. 8 20 20, SS breakers 1. Adapted from Generic letter 84-15. I IABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COWEN' CAIEGORIZATIONS. DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION ____ __—___— Rslerenc for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section (misting Comment Commend/ Documentation Disposition In the TSUP TS Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to Licensee Documentation 4.8.3.2 4.6.21 Power Distribution fie Breakers 0, A, 8 20 20, SS 4.8.3.24 4.6.1.1013) Power Distribution Battery/bus 0, A 20 20. 55 I Connect Ion Associated inverters Definition At, A 16 16. 55 4,8.3.2 Action Nona Power Distribution Core Alt/Cons. 0, 8 20 20. 55 I Rod Movement 4.8.4c Stine ACM Ofeset Generator Day Yank Water AZ, A 24 24, 31 Removal tabte 4.8.4-1 None AOI Giese) Generator Perforsance Al, C. A 24 24, 31 liaised Testing 3/4.9.1 4.1.1 Fuel Remittal and Maintenance LCO 3.9.1-1 E 13 14, l5 fn the **actor 2 0, Al, 0, A 13, 21 11, 15, 12, 29 3 O, U. Da, AI, A I3, 21 II, 15, 22, 29 4 0, 8 t3 14, l5 5 0, 8 I3 14, 15 6 O. A1, A 13 [4, 35. 29 1 D, A 13 34, 15 8 F 13 14 LCO 3.9.1 (Part 1) A/ If 22. 28 LCO 3.9.1 (Part 21 F 11 22. 28 LCO 3.9.1 Al. F. AIF, Al 25 22. 23. 25 lC0 3.9.I.b 6 2? 21 3/4.9.2 4.1.1 instrumentation See RED 3.9.1 directly above 3/1.9.3 4.2.2/5.1.1 Tull handling Machine LC0 3.9.2-1 D, 8 13 14, IS 2 O. 8 13 14. 15 3 0. 8 13 I4. I5 4 A, A 11 14. IS 5 D. A I3 II, IS 6 D, A 13 14. 15 ■ i m I I TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTIONS COWAN! CAIEOORIIAI IONS. DISPOSITION AND DOCUIENTAIION Deference for Reference foe Comment Comment Categorization New Section (misting Comment Commentle Documentation Disposition in the ESOP is Section Section Abbreviated Title identification Categ5iritation to Licensee Documentation 3/4.9.4 4.7.3/5.7-2 Fuel Storage Yells LCO 3.9.3-I 0, 8 11 il, 15 2 0, C 13 14, 15 3 0, C 13 14, 15 4 0, 8 11 14, 15 5 0, 8 13 14, 15 6 D. 8 11 14, 15 7 0. 8 11 lg. 15 8 0, C 13 14, 15 SR 1.9.1.3 6 21 27 3/4.9.5 4.7.1 Spent Fuel Shipping Cask None 3/4.9.6 None Communications SR 4.9.6 Al. A . 21 27, 1 3/4.10.1 4.9.3 Tenon Stability tests (CO 3.10.1 F 25 25 SR 4.10.1 F 25 25 m 3.10.1 Oasis F 25 25 CO 6.5.2.9 Al, A 25 25, 1 5.1 6.3 Site 5.1 1 0, A 11 14. 15 2 0, 8 13 14. 15 3 E 11 14, IS 4 A. A 13 14, 25 FIq.5.1.2 Al, A 25 25, 26 DF 5.1_1 6 21 27 • 5.2.1 6.2.1 Prestressed Concrete Reactor 5.2 6 13 14, 15 Vessel 5.2.2 6.2.2 Steam Generator Orifices None Deleted 6.2.3 Steam Safety Valves Section 5.2.3 6 27 21 5.3.1 6.1 Reactor Assembly None 5.3-2 6,1 Active Core None 5.3.3 6.1 Fuel S.3-1 0. A 13 14, IS 6 6 13 14, IS 5.3.4 None Reload Segment Design S.3-1 0, A 13 It, 15 2 A, A 13 11, 15 3 0, Al. A 13 11, 15, 19 4 6 13 II .. I I I . I. I II I , J i I I TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SCCIIONS CQWFNI CATEGORIZATIONS, DisPO5ti ION AND DOCUIKTA1CON Reference for Reference for Coamrnt Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Conmenlll Documentation Disposition in the TSUP 55 Section Section Abbreviated Title Identification Categorization to licensee Documentation 5.3.5 6.1 Reflector None 5.3.6 None Control Rods None 5.3.1 None Reserve Shutdown System Of 5.3.1 A 26 26 5.4.1 5.6.1.1 Criticality 5.3.5 D. 1 13 14. IS 5.4.2 5.6 Containment None 5.4.3 4.6 Neutron Absorber•Neet Sink None 5.5 5.5 Meteorological Tower 5.1.4 A. A 13 l4. 15 0-m VD 5.6 5.7 Cycle LIAR None 6.1 7.1.1 Responsibility 6.1.1 0, B 13 14, IS 2 D. B 13 14. 15 6.2 7.1.1 Organization 6.2.3 0. B 13 14, IS 6.3 1.1.1 Unit Staff Qualifications 6.3/6.4-1 0, De. 6 13. 20 1,. 15, 22 2 D. A 6.4 7.1.1 Training 6.316.4.3 D. A 13 14, 15 6.5.1111 7.1.2 Plant Operations Committee 6.5.1 0. ASCABBAIA, 13. 20 I1, 15, 19, 22 M6 HBAAI ABCAASAAA AAIBBM1 ADCAZBOA &AMU AIAB)CAISMA MBBAA 6.5.1.6 Dm 27 27 • 6.5.2 7.1.3 Nuclear Facility Committee 6.5.2 0. B 13 la. IS 6.5.2.9 Al, A. I3. 25 14, 15. 25. 26 6.5.2.10 C 25 25 I I I I I I i I I -I at 11.&E 2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECl1ONS COWAN! CATEOORI1AIIONS, DISPOSITION AND DOCUMENTATION ___ Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing Comment Comments/ Documentation Disposition in the 1SOW FS Section Section Abbreviated litte Identification Categorization to licensee Documentation_ 6.6 7.5.2 Reportable Events None 6.7 7.2 Safety Limit Violations None 6.8 7.e Procedures 6 Programs 6.8 0, A 13 14, 15 6.8.1.1 C 25 25 6.9.1111 7.5.1 Routine Reports 6.9-1 0. AGM, ASAIA 13, 21 14, iS. 22. 29 AMA 2 0, C 13 it, 15 3 0. 8 13 14, 15 4 D. C 11 14, 15 S D. A 13 14. IS 6 O. A II it, is 6.9.1-3 A 26 26 its 6.9.2 None Special Airports alone 0 6.9.3' 7.5.3 Non-Routine Radiological Reports None 6.10 7.3 Record Retention 6.10-1 0, A 13 14, 15 2 0, F 13 14. 15 6.11 1.4 Radiation Protection None 6.12 None High Radiation Area None . 6.13 None Process Control Program None 6.1.4 None Offeile Dose Manual None 6.15 None LI9uId, Gaseous. Solid None Waste 6.16 None Fuel Surveillance None 6.11 7.6 Environmental Qualification 6.17 0. I 13 14. 15 6.18 hone 1511 6.17 a 26 26 6.18 a 25 25 0 TABLE 2.2 TECHNICAL SRECIEICAf ION SECIIONS CONIEN1 CATEGORIZATIONS. OISROSIPION AND DOCUMENT/MON (continued) ---^--_---�- -- Reference for Reference for Comment Comment Categorization New Section Existing (cement Comments% Documentation Disposition in the ISL. IS Section Section Abbreviated line Identification Cateoorization to licensee Documentation 7.0 dot Used 8.0 8.0 Audiological and Environmental None vo .-, II Columns headed Convent Categorization. explained in the test. and Comment Disposition Oocussntstio+ shows how the comments were categorized and disposttloned In the series of PSC/NRC meetings. For example, for Mew Section 6.17, canment 6.17 was categorized D In the first meeting, Ref. 14, and 8 in the second meeting, Ref. IS. Ref. IS also coincidently became the final documentation of disposition because in this case the comment was recategorized 8 and dropped. III For New Section 6.5.1 and 6.9.1. the SnStiai single comment was subdivided in the second meeting, Ref. 15. so multiple comment categorizations appear for the second meeting. 1 6 1 dl I I I i I I I I I I I. I, i 5. REFERENCES I . H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program, Revised Final Draft Submittal," Public Service Company of Colorado, May 27, 1988. 2. H. L. Grey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) , Justification of Changes to Current Specifications." Public Service Company of Colorado, June 14, 1988. 3. H. L. Grey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) Revisions to Final Draft," Public Service Company of - Colorado, August 5, 1988. 4. J, C. Stachew, "Technical Evaluation Report for Review of Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program," EGG-NTA•7795, July 1988. 5. A. Udy, "Review of the Fort St. Vrain Upgraded Technical Specifications: Section 3/4.8 - Auxiliary Electric Power Systems. " EGG-NTA-7890, July 1988. 6. O. L. Moses, "Technical Evaluation Report for Review of Fort St. Vrain - Technical Specification Upgrade Program", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, July 1988. - 7. H. R. Denton letter to R. F. Walker, "Preliminary Report Related to the Restart and Continuing Operation of Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station." Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 16, 1984. 8. 0. R. Lee letter to E. H. Johnson, "Upgraded Technical Specifications for Acceptance Review," Public Service Company of Colorado, April 1, 1985. 9. T. L. King Memorandum for E. J. Butcher, "Summary of Meeting With Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) on Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Technical Specification Upgrade," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 15, 1985. 10. P. C. Wagner letter to M. Holmes, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 28, 1985. 11 . E. J. Butcher letter to 0. R. Lee, "Fort St. Vrain (FSV)--Technical Specification Upgrade--NRC Responses to Action Items," Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 22, 1985. 12. 0. R. Lee letter to H. N. Berkow, "Upgrade Technical Specifications," Public Service Company of Colorado. November 27, 1985. 192 • • 13 . K. L. Heitner letter to R. F. Walker, "NRC Comments on the Final Draft of the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Upgraded Technical Specifications (TS) , " Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 30, 1986. C. S. Hinson Memorandum for H. N. Berkow, "Summary of October 1-2, 1986 Meeting With Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) to Discuss Staff Comments on the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP)," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 28, 1986. 15. C. S. Hinson Memorandum for H. N. Berkow, "Summary of October 27-30, 1986 Meeting at Fort St. Vrain (FSV) to Discuss Staff Comments on the FSV Technical Specification. Upgrade Program (TSUP)," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 15, 1986. 16. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Summary of December 18, 1986 Meeting on Draft Technical Specifications Section 3/4.8 and Request For Additional Information," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 18, 1987. 17. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "NRC Comments on the Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP), LCO's for Safety-Related Cooling Functions, " Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 17, 1987. 18. H. L. Brey letter to Herbert N. Berkow, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program, Redrafted LCOs," Public Service Company of Colorado, February 28. 1986. 19. H. L. Brey letter to H. N. Berkow, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program," Public Service Company of Colorado, February 20, 1987. 20. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Draft Updated Technical Specification Section 3/4.8, Request for Additional Information (TAC-No. 56565)," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 6, 1987. 21 . K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Request for Additional Information for Technical Specification Upgrade Program for Fort ST. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (TAC No. 56565)," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 2, 1987. 22. K. L. Heitner Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Meeting With Public Service Company of Colorado to Discuss Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program - August 25 and 26, 1987," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, - October 1, 1987. 23. K. L. Heitner, Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Meeting with Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) on Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) - December 2-3, 1987," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 12, 1988. 193 24. K. L. Heitner Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Meeting With Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) on Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) - March 15 and 16, 1988," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 4, 1988. 25. K. L. Heitner Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Teleconferences with Public Service Company of Colorado on Technical Specification Upgrade Program--April 18 and 26, (TAC No. 56565)," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 10, 1988. 25. K. L. Heitner Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Teleconference with Public Service Company of Colorado on Technical Specification Upgrade Program-May 18, 1988," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 6, 1988, 27 . K. L. Heitner Memorandum for J. A. Calvo, "Summary of Teleconference with Public Service Company of Colorado on Technical Specification Upgrade Program - July 13, 1988," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 26, 1988. 28. H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) , Safety Related Cooling Function Resubmittal ," Public Service Company of Colorado," December 23, 1987. • 29. H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP), Additional Information," Public Service Company of Colorado, " February 2, 1988. 20. H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) Additional Information," Public Service Company of Colorado, March 8, 1988. 31 . H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "Final Draft Upgrade Electrical Technical Specifications Sections 3/4.8," Public Service Company of Colorado, March 22, 1988. 32. 0. R. Lee letter to Eric Johnson, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program," Public Service Company of Colorado, November 16, 1984. 33. NUREG-0452, Rev. 4, Standard Technical Specifications for Westinahouse Prpssuritrd Wfter Reactors, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Fall 1981. 34 . E. H. Johnson letter to 0. R. ee, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. December 20, 1984. 35. K. L. Heitner Memorandum for Herbert N. Berkow, "Summary of June 27, 1986 Meeting with Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) to Discuss Status of the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) ," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 21, 1986. 194 36. R. 0. Williams letter to H. N. Berkow, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program, " Public Service Company of Colorado, August 15, 1986. 37. R, 0. Williams letter to J. A. Calvo, "Technical Specification Change Request to he Plant Protective System Trip Setpoints," Public Service Company of Colorado, February 8, 1988. 38. J. C. Stachew, "Technical Evaluation Report for the Plant Protective System Trip Setpoints for Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station," EGG-NTA-7289, March 1988. 39. K. L. Meitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 60, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 20, 1988. 40, H. L. Brey letter to J. A. Calvo, "NUREG-0737 Items Requiring Technical Specifications," Public Service Company of Colorado, May 15, 1987. 41 . R. 0. Williams letter to J. A. Calvo, "Fire Protection Program Plan Submittal ," Public Service Company of Colorado, December 15, 1987. 42, H. L. Brey letter to H. N. Berkow, "Inservice Inspection and Testing," Public Service Company of Colorado, February 13, 1987. 43, Regulatory Guide 1.68, Revision 2, Initial Test Proarams for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. August 1978. 44. Draft Regulatory Guide Division 1, Task SC 521-4, LWR Core Reloads: Guidance on Applications for Amendments to Operatino license; and on Refueling anp, Star;uo Tests, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1979. (A set of thirteen public comments are available in the Public Document Room on Task SC 521-4.) The draft regulatory guide was intended to implement formally the previously distributed "Guidance • for Proposed License Amendments Relating to Refueling," enclosed with the K. R. Goller letters to operating LWR licensees, untitled, Division of Reactor Licensing, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 18 or 23, 1975. 45, ANSI/ANS-19.3-1983, American National Standard; The Qetermination of Neutron Reaction Rate Oistrihution aril Reactivity of Nuclear Reactors, American Nuclear Society, June 10, 1983. 46, ANSI/ANS-19.4-1983 (Reaffirmation of ANS-19.4/ANSI N652-1976), American National Standard; A GujOe for Arquisitioq and Decumentat en of Reference Power Reactor Physic; Measurements for Nuclear Analysis Verification, American Nuclear Society, June 10, 1983. 47, ANSI/ANS-19.5-1983 (Reaffirmation of ANSI/ANS-19.5-1978), American National Standard: Regujrements_for Fefcrance Reactor Physics Measurements, American Nuclear Society, June 10, 1983. 195 48. R. 0. Williams Draft letter to H. N. Berkow, "Proposed Technical Specification Change, LCO 4.1.9, Core Inlet Orifice Valves/ Minimum Helium Flow and Maximum Core Region Temperature Rise," Public Service Company of Colorado, March 25, 1987. 49. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification LCO 4.1.9," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 5, 1986. SO. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 57, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 23, 1987. 51. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Comments on Fort St. Vrain Updated FSAR, Revision No. 4," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 18, 1986. 52. NUREG-1O24, Technical $oecificftIonc--fnhanging theme Safety taws, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 1983. 53. D. L. Moses, "Technical Evaluation Report: The Acceptability of Fort St. Vrain Upgraded Technical Specifications for Structures, Systems, and Components with Safety-Related and Important-to-Safety Cooling Functions," Oak Ridge National Laboratory, July 1988. 54. NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1987. 55. H. L. Brey Letter to NRC, J. Calvo, "Final Draft Upgrade Technical Specification Section 3/4.8, dated November 30, 1985," August 24, 1987. P-87272. 56. 0. R. Lee Letter to NRC, E. H. Johnson, "Proposed Supplemental Technical Specification Change to Sections 4.4 and 5.4," June 22, 1984, P-84187. 57. 0. R. Lee Letter to NRC, J. T. Collins, "Proposed Technical Specifications Changes - Fort St. Vrain Electrical System Requirements," December 30, 1983, P-83415. 58. P. C. Wagner letter to 0. R. Lee, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 37 to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 23, 1983. 59. K. L. Heitner letter to R. F. Walker, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 47, to Facility Operating License OPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 4, 1986. 196 60. C. S. Hinson letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 48, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 25, 1986. 61 . C. S. Hinson letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 49, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 15, 1986. 62. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 50, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 26, 1987. 63. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 51, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 9, 1987. 64. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 52, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 6, 1987. 65. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 53, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 5, 1987. 66. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 54, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 20, 1987. 57. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 55, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 29, 1987. 68. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 56, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 13, 1987. 69. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station,. Amendment No. 58, to Facility Operating License DPR-34," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January 22, 1987. 70. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, Amendment No. 59, to Facility Operating License DPR-34 (TAC No. 64439),' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April 7, 1988. 197 71 . 0. R. Lee letter to E. H. Johnson, "Proposed Changes to Sections 2.1, _ 3.3, 4.0, 5.0, LCO 4.4.1, and SR 5.4.1 of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specifications," Public Service Company of Colorado, June 21, 1985. 72. F. J. Miraglia, NRC letter, To All Light Water Reactor licensees and Applicants, "Sections 3.0 and 4.0 of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) on the Applicability of Limiting Conditions for Operation and Surveillance Requirements (Generic Letter 87-09)," June 4, 1987. 73. J. W. Gahm letter to E. H. Johnson and E. J. Butcher, "Licensee Event Report 84-008, Final Report," Public Service Company of Colorado, November 1, 1985. 74. J. W. Gahm letter to E. Johnson, "Draft Technical Specifications to Improve Control Rod Reliability," Public Service Company of Colorado, March 15, 1985. 75, 0. R. Lee letter to E. H. Johnson, "Technical Specifications for Control Rods," Public Service Company of Colorado, June 7, 1985. 76. H. L. Thompson memorandum for R. P. Denise, "Review of Fort St. Vrain Draft Technical Specifications for Control Rods," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 28, 1985. 77. 0. R. Lee letter to E. H. Johnson, "Interim Technical Specifications for Reactivity Systems," July 10, 1985. 78. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station - Proposed Change to Interim Technical Specification 3/4.1.7, Reactivity Change With Temperature," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 25, 1988. 79, NUREG-0123, Rev. 3, Standard Technical Sgecificatinnt for General Electric Boilino water Reeactors, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Fall 1981. 80. K. L. Heitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TAC No. 56565)," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 21, 1988. 81. E. H. Johnson letter to 0. R. Lee, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, July 23, 1985. 82. Regulatory Guide 1.23, Proposed Revision 1, Meteorological Programs in S,goport of Nuclear epwer Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1980. 83. G. L. Madsen letter to 0. R. Lee, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 8, 1983. 84. NUREG-0123, Revision 3, standard Technical Specifications for Ggneral Ftric Roiling Wfter Reactors (BWR/51, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Fall 1980. 198 85. D. L. Moses and S. J. Ball , "Technical Evaluation Report: Technical Evaluation of the Proposed Redundancy Requirements for Helium Circulator Technical Specifications to Accommodate the Rapid Depressurization Accident," Oak Ridge National Laboratory, December I4, 1987. (Attachment 2 to Reference 80.) 86. GA Technologies, Inc. , Document No. 908849 Issue A, "FSV-EQ and Offsite Radiation Doses for 100% Power," A. Bagierek, June 1987. 87. Regulatory Guide 1.70, Revision 3, Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for. Nur_lear Power Plants, Office of Standards Development, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 1978. 88. H. R. Denton letter to R. F. Walker, "Authorization for Interim Operation of Fort St. Vrain at 35 Percent of Full Power," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 7, 1986. 89. F, J. Miraglia, NRC letter, To All Power Reactor Licensees and Applicants," Removal of Organization Charts from Technical Specification Administrative Control Requirements (Generic Letter 88-06) ," March 22, 1988. 90. K. L. Meitner letter to R. 0. Williams, "Fort St. Vrain - Technical Specification Changes to Administrative Controls (TAC No. 67407)," Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 24, 1988. 91 . E. H. Johnson letter to 0. R. Lee, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 8, 1984. 92. D. G. Eisenhut, NRC letter to All Operating Reactor Licensees, "Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses in Support of Licensing Actions (Generic Letter No. 83-11), " February 8, 1983. 93. 0. G. Eisenhut, NRC letter to All Licensees of Operating Reactors and Applicants for Operating License, "Scheduling Guidance for Licensee Submittals of Reloads that Involve Unreviewed Safety Questions (Generic Letter No. 84-20), August 20, 1984. 199 APPENDIX A Scope and Guidelines for the Fort St. Vrain (FSV) Technical Specification Upgrade Program (TSUP) . , Commitments by Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) plus clarifying comments in brackets. P-1 Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCOs) will be revised to identify the applicable operating modes, limiting condition and action statement defining remedial actions to be taken if the limiting condition is exceeded. P-2 All applicable operating modes will be clearly identified for each LCO. P-3 Limiting conditions and action statements will agree with Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) accident and safety analyses. P-4 LCOs will cross reference the applicable Surveillance Requirement (SR) and SRs will cross reference the applicable LCO. All LCOs will have associated with them one or more SRs and all SRs will have associated with them one or more LCOs. P-5 Surveillances will be specified as necessary and sufficient to verify compliance with the associated LCO(s) . P-6 SRs will describe the associated acceptance criteria. P-7 Technical Specification statements will be unambiguous with a singular interpretation. P-3 Terminology used in the Technical Specifications will be clearly defined. P-9 Technical Specifications will be simplified if possible. P-10 LCO format will be revised to include the LCO number and title, applicability statement, LCO statement, action statement(s), and cross reference to the associated SR(s). [Format has actually adhered more closely to that of the Standard Technical Specifications than implied by this scope item.] P-11 Technical Specifications will be reviewed and expanded as necessary to assure accuracy, completeness, and consistency with existing design and safety analysis documentation. [However, the interpretation has been made that licensing bases will not be required to be added to the TSAR for those Technical Specifications that lack such documentation.] P-12 The Technical Specifications will account for and utilize existing plant equipment and safety systems. [This includes equipment changes A-1 made during the TSUP reviews such as the 6-inch vent lines installed on the main steam lines to meet Environmental Qualification requirements.) P-13 The initial draft of the upgraded Technical Specifications will be submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by April 1, 1985. P-14 A schedule for the Technical Specification Upgrade Program will be submitted to the NRC for information by December 14, 1984. II . PSC Guidelines for Use of the Standard Technical Specifications (STS) G-1 Plant modifications and backfits would not be undertaken to permit the adoption of any Standard Technical Specification requirement. G-2 It is outside the scope of the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program to utilize or consider any Standard Technical Specification requirement which opens the licensing basis of the Fort St. Vrain plant for further justification or analysis. G-3 Significant research and development efforts or analytical investigations would not be undertaken to determine how to utilize, or whether or not a Standard Technical Specification requirement can be utilized at Fort St. Vrain. Questionable Standard Technical Specifications requiring such efforts and investigations would not be utilized or given further consideration. G-4 The numbering system of the Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Technical Specification format, whereby each LCO is juxtaposed to its associated SR, would not be utilized for the Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program. [Withdrawn, or at least not adhered to.] G-5 The Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program will adopt relevant Standard Technical Specification definitions where the definitions are consistent with existing plant features and the licensing basis of the Fort St. Vrain plant, i.e. , FSAR terminology and analyses. G-6 The Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program will adopt relevant Standard Technical Specification requirements, including limiting conditions for operation, surveillance requirements, and surveillance frequencies, which are consistent with existing plant features and the licensing basis of the Fort St. Vrain plant as embodied in the FSAR. G-7 Each Fort St. Vrain Upgraded Technical Specification requirement need only be supported and justified relative to the licensing basis of the Fort St. Vrain plant as embodied in the FSAR, and justification would not be required regarding the Standard Technical Specification treatment of the same or similar requirements for light water reactor plants. A-2 1i; . NRC Changes and Clarifications Regarding the FSV TSUP Scope. N-1 ANSI/ANS Standard 58.4 (1979 Edition), Criteria for Technical 5oecifications for Nurl ar Power Stations, will be used for guidance regarding the content of the Technical Specifications. N-2 The bases for the Technical Specifications will be included in the upgrade effort. N-3 The Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse pressurized water reactors (PWRs) will be used as guidance, where applicable, in performing the upgrade. N-4 A thorough review of the FSV-FSAR and other relevant design documentation will be done to ensure the Technical Specifications are complete and correct. ("Correctness" of the Technical Specifications was interpreted by NRC not to mean that the FSV-FSAR had to be updated to support the carried-over provisions of existing Specification that lacked a formally documented licensing basis.] N-5 Operating experience to date will be considered and factored into the upgrade effort. N-6 The need for additional instrumentation or other hardware to ensure compliance with the upgraded Technical Specifications will be considered on a case-by-case basis. N-7 Any hardware change, analytical effort, or developmental work, which may be proposed by PSC as a result of the upgrade effort, will be scheduled for completion at a later date if it cannot be done by July 1, 1985. A-3 -.C'O.a,JS JI Y"Ca...l0u%.,0.•Co..wulo, •Ea6a• '.a. e.'C[ .e•Er .. . r.•"w.;; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET EGG-NTA-8124 $ee %S•4C 0%S Jr•.e•f.e•St •.e.��5.e' •.E . .f.ra e..n. INTEGRATED TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR REVIEW OF FORT ST. VRAIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRADE PROGRAM • ;.TI•e•Q• MI_a E0 October 1988 Dr, D. L. Moses . o.'e•e•:-. ,,.a. J. C. Stachew *Coen e•• A. C. Udy October 1988 •f•'O.WY4 O•un'L*'•OY YAM'.003 wit,iYO.OO•e„r'-'u.E 1.C,—, a •.ale,t•µ WO.%.Y„%waft Mechanical Systems Evaluations Unit Regulatory and Technical Assistance Group + •i%o.c..Y,%Oaee• EG&G Idaho, Inc. D6023 P. 0. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, ID 83415 '0 S•OY,O•wG J•O.Yr:,.O.%.••e•Y0 Y.V a%O.00nee ,•u.•.it CA-, ''E ...e o.hl/O•, Division of Licensing Final Technical Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Evaluation Report U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission .Pima*49.040 .m•."... Washington, DC 20555 "I ,..•q E%%%•...%O.a, '] ..E •.C• iXwaEM all • Integrated Technical Evaluation Report on the review of Public Service Company of Colorado Technical Specification Upgrade Program for the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. This integrated Technical Evaluation Report combines three earlier reports to be comprehensive to the entire Technical Specification Upgrade Program for For: St. Vrain. The three earlier reports are: EGG-NTA-7890, "Review of the Fort St. Vrain Upgraded Technical Specifications: Section 3/4.8 - Auxiliary Electric Power Systems," Alan C. Udy, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, July 1988; EGG-NTA-7795, "Technical Evaluation Report for Review of Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program," J. C. Stachew, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, July 1988; and "Technical Evaluation Report for Review of Fort St. Vrain Technical Specification Upgrade Program," D. L. Moses, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, July 1988. ;oc-ae.,•Y•.'5-$-• Er.o.00.0f,C.'••C•, . ....-a4'. Unlimited •..$te...,••:-m.e:.-:%I re.*ale' :ew-• t 'O'I'('040•e.•.S Unclassified Unclassified . \-Wt:•.•.6 I C0'7: 9elV!4,1 /A • op REG4,‘ + UNITED STATES 0 P $./4 • 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION yFs , 0 i WASHINGTON,D.G.20555 40 0 y April 18, 1989 Docket Nu. 5C-267 Mr. R. C. Williams, Jr. Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations Public Service Company of Colorado Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Dear Mr. Williams: SUBJECT: FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION AMENDMENT N0. 70 TC FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-34 (TAC NO. 69860) The Conrcissicr has issued the enclosed Amendment tiu. 70 to Facility Operating License No. OPP-34 for the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. This amendment consists of changes to the license in response to your application, datee January 13, 1989. The amerdmert charses the amount of radioactive materials you may possess for purpose of sample arelysis or instrument calibration. The change else updates the format of the entire license. A copy cf the Safety Evaluation is enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be ir,clucea in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice. Sincerely, Kenneth L. Neither, Project Manager Project Directorate - IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures: 1. Amendment No. 70 to DPR-34 2. Safety Evaluation cc wJenclosures: _ See next page F.r. E. 0. Williams, Jr. Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Werembourg, Manager Albert J. Hazle, Director "%clear Engineering Division Radiation Control Division Public Service Company Department of Health of Colorado 4210 East 11th Avenue P. O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80220 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 rr. David Alberstein, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Fort St. Vrain Services Manager, Nuclear Production GA International Services Corporation and Station Manager Post Office Box 85608 Public Service Company of Colorado San Diego•, California 92138 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Mr. H. L. Erey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Resource rr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager ronagenent Division Quality Assurance Division Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. C. Box 84C 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. D. D. Hock C.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presider•t and Chief Executive Officer P. C. Box 64C Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville , Colorado 80651 Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Kelley, Standiteld & O'Donnell PTTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Commitment Control Program Public Service Company Building Coordinator Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-0 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80211 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation. Fitgrans Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 , REC1/4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION • ( s WASHINGTON,0.C.20555 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO DOCKET NO. 50-267 FORT ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 70 License No. DPR-34 1 . The I:uclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: A. The application for amendment by Public Service Company of Colorado (the licensee) dated January 13, 1989, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth io 10 CFA Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations Lf the Conrissien; C. There is reasonable assurance: (1) that the activities authorized by this amer,oment Lan be conducted without euoangtring the health ant safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will rot be inimical to the ccrmon defense and security or to the health ana safety of the public; and £. The issuance of this emenon.ent is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. - 2 - 2. Accordingly, Facility Operating License No. DPR-34 is hereby amended to redo as provided on the following pages. 3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COrrISSION X71 ' a . G<,C Jose A. Calvo, Director Project Directorate - IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attachment: Changes to the license Date of Issuance: April 18, 1989 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 70 TC FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-34 DOCKET NO. 50-267 Replace the entire text cf Futility Operating License No. DPR-34 with the following pages. Amendment No. 70 p,Nf� Page I of 4. .�� UNITED STATES It:777 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION as�`p�� ! WASHINGTON.D.C.20555 44 PUBLIC SERVICE•COMDANY.OF COLORADO FORT ST. YRAIN.UUCLEAR.GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-267 FACILITY.OPERATING.LICENSE License No. DPR-34: 1. The Atomic Energy Commission (the Commission) having found that: A. The application for license filed by the Public Service Company of Colorado (the licensee) complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth ir, 10 CFR Chapter I and all required notifications to other agencies or bodies have been duly made; B. Construction of the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (the facility) has been substantially completed in conformity with the Provisional Construction Permit No. CPPR-54 and the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations cf the Commission; C. The facility will operate in conformity with the application. as amended the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; 0. There is reasonable assurance: (i) that the activities authorized by this operating license can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission; E. The licensee is technically and financially qualified to engage in the activities authorized by this operating license in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission; F. The licensee has satisfied the applicable provisions of 10 CFR Part 140, "Financial Protection Requirements and Indemnity Agreements," of the Commission's regulations; G. The issuance of this operating license will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; Amendment No. 70 Page 2 of 4 P. After weighing the environmental, economic, technical, and other benefits of the facility against environmental costs and considering available alternatives, the issuance of Facility Operating License No. OPR-34 (subject to the conditions for protection of the environment set forth herein) is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51, (NOTE: Environment requirements covered by Part SI; No Appendix 0 to Part 50.) of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied; and I. The receipt, possession, and use of source, byproduct, and special nuclear material as authorized by this license will be in accordance with the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, 70, and 73. 2. Facility Operating License No. DPR-34 is hereby issued to the Public Service Company of Colorado to read as follows: A. This license applies to the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station, a high temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactor and associated equipment (the facility) owned by the Public Service Company of Colorado. The facility is located near Platteville, in Weld County, Colorado, and is described in the "Final Safety Analysis Report" as supplemented and amended (Amendments 15 through 29) and the Environmental Report as supplemented and amended (Supplements 1 through 3). E. This license is subject, for the initial rise to power, to the conditions set forth in Specification LCO 4.9-1 of the Technical Specifications attached hereto as Appendix A. C. Subject to the conditions and requirements incorporated herein, the Commission hereby licenses the Public Service Company of Colorado: (1) Pursuant to Section 104b of the Act and 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," to possess, use, and operate the facility at the designated location near Platteville in Weld County, Colorado, in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in this license; (2) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 40 and 70, to receive, possess and use at any time source and special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage and amounts required for reactor operation, as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, as supplemented and amended; (3) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use at any time any byproduct, source and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; p Amendment No.70 Page 3 of 4 (4) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 4C and 70, to receive, possess are use in amounts as reouired any byproduct, source cr special nuclear materiel without restricticr to chemical or physical form., for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (5) Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility authorized herein. D. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the following Commission regulations in 10 CFR Chapter is Part 20, Section 30.34 of Part 30, Section 40.41 of Part 40. Sections 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and the appropriate sections of Parts 70 and 73; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, anc orders of the Commission now ur hereafter in effect; end is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below: (1) Maximum: Power Level The licensee is authorized to operate the facility at steady state reactor core power levels not in excess of 842 megawatts thermal. (2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A anc 8, as revisec through Amendment No.69 , are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in scccrderce with the Technical Specifications. (3) Physical Prctectior. The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect • all previsions of the Commissior.-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans including amendments made pursuant to provisions of the F'iscellanecus Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The plans, which contain Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, are entitled: "Fort St. Vrair Security Plan," with revisions submitted through July 15, 1988; "Fort St. Vrain Guard Training and Qualification Plan," with revisions submittea through February 27, I987; and "Fott St. Vrair. Safeguards Contingency Plan," with revisions submitted through February 27, 1987. Changes made in accordance with 10 CFR 73.55 shall be implemented in accordance with the schedule set forth therein. Amenon*r,t Pc. 70 Page 4 of 4 E. This license is subject to all Federal, State, and loctl standards imposed pursuart to the requirements cf the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. 3. This license is effective as of the date of issuance and shell expire at ridright, September 17, 2008. FOR THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION "ORIGINAL SIGNED 8Y:" A. Giambusso, Deputy Director for Reactor Projects Directorate of Licensing Attachments: Appendices P and F - Technical Specifications Date of ::suence: December 21, 1973 F(G G EPN ,9 ; ?1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - � WASHINGTON,D.C.20555 G %a\ ! SAFETY.EVALUATION•BY.THE OFFICE OF NUCLEARREACTCR.REGULATION RELATED TO•AMENDMENT-NO. 70 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-34 PUBLIC-SERVICE-COMPANY OF.COLORADO FORT-ST. VRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET.NO. •50-267 1.0 INTRODUCTION By letter dated January 13, 1989, the licensee requested that the staff amend the Facility Operating License No. OPR-34 to allow the possessior, of an increased amount of radioactive material for calibration purposes. The licensee also requested that the license be reformatted to resemble recently issued licenses. These changes would allow the licensee to possess appropriate sources for calibration of the high range detector instrumentation. 2.0 EVALUATION The specific portions of the license updated are as follows: Parts 2.C. (2), 2.C.(3), 2.C.(4), and 2.C.(5) concerning receipt possession and use of source, byproduct and special nuclear material. In each case, these sections have been updated to reflect the format of newer licenses. Appropriate limits on the amount of materials received, possessed cr utilized are contained in the Regulations or the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The format followed reflects that of licenses recently issued by the Commission and reflects an earlier request by the Commission to update this license. The staff therefore concludes that these proposed changes are acceptable. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in inoividual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility -2- criterie for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Section 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environ- mental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment. 4.0 CONCLUSION The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. Date: April 18, 1989 Principal Contributor: Kenneth L. Heitner, PD-IV • O"A nfo1/4 y+ a'^ UNITED STATES ��G� ` s• t g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION �. N [ WASHINGTON,D.C.20555 CLEF To d, +»«* � r�" April 19, 1989 " Docket No. 50-267 Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations Public Service Company of Colorado Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Dear Mr. Williams: SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS TO CHANGE COMMITMENTS CONCERNING FORT ST. YRAIN (TAC NO. 72063) This letter is in response to your letter dated January 20. 1989, concerning proposed and planned changes to commitments made by Public Service Company of Colorado (PSC) with regard to the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station (FSV). The staff has reviewed your proposals and provided comments in the enclosure to this letter which correspond to your proposals. However, this letter does not at this time provide specific relief from your commitments which have been confirmed by Order. Relief from those commitments must be formally requested in a separate letter which specifically refers to the Order involved. In order to have a firm basis for granting relief from your commitments, it is the staff's view that your commitment to terminate FSV operations on or before June 30, 1990, must be included in the current license. Therefore, the staff requests that you submit an amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-34 specifically amending Section 2.D of the license to include: (4) Early Shutdown The licensee is not authorized to operate the reactor (above 5 percent of full power) for electric power production after June 30, 1990. The staff will grant relief after the revised license amendment is issued. The staff may also confirm specific other commitments that the staff believes are important to safety at FSV, even with power operations eliminated. Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. -2- The enclosure also contains certain requests for additional information. Please provide this information within 60 days of the date of this letter. The information requested in this letter affects fewer than ten respondents. therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L. 96-511. If you have any questions regarding the issues discussed in this letter, please request a conference call with the NRC Project Manager at (301)492-1333. Sincerely, Kenneth L. Heitner, Project Manager Project Directorate - IV Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure: As stated cc w/enclosure: See next page Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Albert J. Haile, Director Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Control Division Public Service Company Department of Health of Colorado 4210 East 11th Avenue P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80220 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Mr. David Alberstein, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Fort St. Vrain Services Manager, Nuclear Production GA International Services Corporation and Station Manager Post Office Box 85608 Public Service Company of Colorado San Diego, California 92138 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Resource Mr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Management Division Quality Assurance Division Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. O. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. D. D. Hock U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission President and Chief Executive Officer P. O. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Kelley, Standfield b O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Commitment Control Program Public Service Company Building Coordinator Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-0 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80211 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 a Enclosure DETAILED COMMENTS ON CHANGES TO COMMITMENTS BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NRC CONFIRMATORY ORDER AND OTHER NRITTEN COMMITMENTS I.A. Fire Protection Modifications The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written commitment to the proposed schedule. It is the staff's intention to confirm by Order selected items, including the completion of Emergency Lighting and Fire Detection. I.B. Upgrade Emergency Operating Procedures The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the August 2, 1985 Confirmatory Order to indicate that the upgraded EOP's will be implemented by September 30, 1989. TAC No. 44304 is closed. I.C. Submit Annual Reports on the Control of Moisture Ingress The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15, 1988 listing of commitments to reflect this change. T.D. Evaluate Control of Moisture in CRDM Purge System The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15. 1988 listing of commitments to reflect this change. I.E. Technical Specification Upgrade Program The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15, 1988 listing of commitments to reflect this change. However, the staff notes that at the proposed time for submittal, ail technical issues related to defueling may not be resolved. In that case, the staff notes that supplementary submittals may be required. I.F. PCRV Tendon Surveillance Pending acceptable results from the current (1989) surveillance program, the staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15, 1988 listing of commitments to - reflect this change. J - 2 - I.G. Regulatory Guide 1.97 Post Accident Monitoring The staff will accept PSC's recommendation of no further upgrades except as allowed without a plant outage. PSC must provide the staff a complete status report of alt the RG 1.97 instrumentation, clearly indicating its current status. PSC should request that the August 2, 1985 Confirmatory Order be modified to read: "Complete as per the status report submitted on ....". II.A. Safety Parameter Display System The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the August 2, 1985 Confirmatory Order to indicate that the SPDS will not be implemented. All currently operable computer systems used by the operators should be maintained for the balance of plant life. II.8 ACM Backfeed Enhancements The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15, 1988 listing of commitments to reflect this change. However, the staff will reconsider the vulnerabilities of the plant to station blackout during the defueling period and may consider retention of the ACM in that evaluation. II.C. Control Rod Drive Orifice and Assembly The staff will accept PSC's recommendations as submitted. PSC should provide a written request to modify the September 15. 1988 listing of commitments to reflect this change. II.D. Fuel Surveillance Program • The staff notes that certain aspects of the fuel surveillance program potentially could support the licensing of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). (The Surry ISFSI had certain limits placed on the condition of the fuel that the ISFSI could accept.) The staff is still evaluating the proposal to cancel this program and may issue further correspondence on this topic. NRC TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT CONTROL LIST COMMITMENTS I.A. Safeguards - Miscellaneous Amendments PSC's commitment is acceptable. I.B. Fire Protection Program Plan Approval b Deletion of Fire Protection Technical Specifications PSC's commitment is acceptable. I.C. EQ Temperature Profiles PSC's commitment is acceptable. - 3 - II.A. Operator Requalification Program PSC must continue to meet the requirements for licensed operators as per 10 CFR Part 55 and the Technical Specifications until all fuel is removed from the reactor. A conference call was held on March 3, 1989 with the PSC staff (M. Holmes and T. Borst) to discuss this issue. II.B. Control Room Habitability PSC should clarify the status of continued use of chlorine gas at the site fol- lowing the shutdown of the reactor. If chlorine gas use is continued, it is the staff's position that the proposed May 31, 1989 submittal could be considered an interim measure. The staff intends to reevaluate the need for PSC to fully comply with the requirements of GL 83-36 and 83-37 concerning control room habitability. II.C. 10 CFR 50.62 Operating Reactor Reviews (ATWS) The staff accepts PSC's proposals. However, PSC should complete all actions for which it has made previous written commitments, including its responses to GL 83-28. II.D. Station Blackout Analysis The staff accepts PSC's proposals. However, PSC should not take any action for final disablement or removal of the ACM system until this is finalized in the shutdown Technical Specifications. III.A. Control Room Design Review (CRDR) Modifications The staff accepts PSC's proposals. However, PSC should prepare and retain en site documentation summarizing the changes made and the items identified as Human Engineering Deficiencies, but left unresolved. Improvements made to the control room should be maintained for the balance of plant life. TAC No. 56125 is closed. II1.8. Control Rod Drive Orifice and Assembly (CRDOA) The staff accepts PSC's proposals. TAC Nos. 61601 and 62198 are closed. III.C. Individual Plant Examination for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities The staff accepts PSC's proposals. III.D. Third DC Distribution Bus The staff accepts PSC's proposals. TAC No. 65517 is closed. III.E. Plant Protective System Instrument Setpoints The staff accepts PSC's proposals. I I - 4 - III.F. Inservice Inspection and Testing Program The staff notes that PSC has stated it will continue to use specific facilities that were to be addressed by future upgrades to the Technical Specifications as part of the ongoing ISIT efforts. Specific areas to be addressed included: - Fuel Storage Facility Surveillance - Category III Systems - Fuel Storage Facility Auxiliary System, and - Category IV Systems - Fuel Storage Well HVAC. Other systems noted in the staff's safety evaluation for Amendment No. 51 dated March 9, 1987 which PSC intends to utilize following the final reactor shutdown and cooidown should also be addressed by the rsIT program. Additionally, the fuel handling machine will see extensive service during the proposed defutling operation. The fuel handling machine is a Class I system as per the FSAR and should be covered by an appropriate ISIT program. PSC should rapidly develop and submit for staff review an ISIT program to cover these sys- tems. This could be either as part of the Technical Specifications or as a separate, but NRC approved program plan. PSC's response to this letter should contain a specific schedule and commitment to an appropriate ISIT program upgrade. The balance of PSC's proposal is acceptable. III.G Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) Walkdown The staff accepts PSC's proposals. TAC No. 69448 is closed. DISPOSITION OF OTHER NRC COMMITMENTS I. Fort St. Vrain Licensee Event Reports The staff accepts PSC's disposition of the specific LERs discussed in this letter. However. PSC must continue to report all new events in accordance with the LER rules. II. NRC Inspections The staff accepts PSC's position. The NRC will continue to inspect PSC's activities in regard to the changes made to plant procedures. III. NRC Bulletins The staff accepts PSC's position. The NRC wilt continue to inspect PSC's activities in responding to NRC Bulletins. IV. NRC Generic Letters The staff accepts PSC's position. The NRC will continue to inspect PSC's activities in responding to NRC Generic Letters. - 5 - V. NRC Information Notices The staff accepts PSC's position. The NRC will continue to inspect PSC's activities in responding to NRC Information Notices. VI. Part 21 Reports The staff accepts PSC's position. The NRC will continue to inspect PSC's activities in responding to Part 21 Reports. VII. NUREG 0737 Open/Unresolved Items The staff accepts PSC's proposals for these items. VIII. Miscellaneous Commitments The staff accepts PSC's proposals for these items. CO ^,S NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES COMPANY Inn I.77. IN 53: I P.O.Box 567 • Palmei Lake.Colorado 80133 • (719)481.2003 • FAX O19)481.4013 - CL"t;( April 21 , 1989 TO THE BOARD I Colorado Congressional Delegation Washington, D. C. 80510, 80515 Dear Senators Armstrong and Wirth; Representatives Brown, Campbell , Henley, Schafer, Schroeder, and Skaggs: EPA' s review of the Two Forks Dam Study irregularities (summary attached ) is certain to sustain Mr. Reilly' s courageous . decision to veto the permit. It would be a travesty for Colorado if the Republican side of our. Congressional Delegation splits with the Bush Administration on this critical environmental issue. National environmental groups and the media are already characterizing Colorado as being environmentally insensitive, and the adverse publicity can rapidly escalate . It is a growing certainty that investment capital gravitates away from those states that appear politically divided on important environmental issues. In spite of the Denver Water Department' s relentless 50 year position to the contrary, Two Forks would cause serious, unmitigable, environmental damage to nationally important natural resources . As indicated in our April 19th Two Forks Alternatives presentation for Colorado' s Congressional Delegation , this destruction is entirely unnecessary. There are several advanced alternatives that are superior, but purposely overlooked in the studies to protect an obsolete concept. Thornton' s ongoing City-Farm Recycling Project to pump 60,000 acre feet of high quality Cache La Poudre irrigation water to Northern Denver suburbs before it is' recycled back to the farms is designed to protect Northern Colorado' s environment and agriculture . Arapahoe County' s ongoing high altitude Union Park storage and siphon project from the untapped Gunnison will increase Metro Denver ' s safe yield by 140,000 acre feet, while providing needed drought protection for the river environments on _ both slopes . These two environmentally sound projects have twice the yield of Two Forks for about half the unit cost . Copies of our presentation slides are enclosed for your further consideration . _ Sincerely aZ '7°4 Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President ADM/bm Encls: Two Forks Irregularities; Alternatives Presentation. cc: local , state, and federal officials. April, 1989 TWO FORKS DAM STUDY IRREGULARITIES Investigation will confirm the following Two Forks study irregularities: 1. The Two Forks site-specific study is fatally flawed, because it did not seriously consider several superior alternatives, including the Gunnison, Green Mountain, and City-Farm Recycling options. 2. Contrary to required study procedures, the Denver Water Department (DWD) pressured the Corps into starting the site-specific analysis before completing a proper system-wide review that should have identified all reasonable alternatives for detailed study. 3. The site-specific analysis only seriously considered the South Platte dam alternatives that fit DWD's Upper Colorado and South Platte water rights. 4. Less than 10% of the total study cost was used for evaluating the • other South Platte dam options identified in the faulted sawing process. 5. About half of the total study cost was for premature Two Forks Dam design work and duplicate environmental studies hired by DWD to influence the same work being done by the responsible permitting agencies. 6. EPA was the only permitting agency that did not accept reimbursement of study expenses from Two Forks proponents. 7. Several key professional staff members of the Corps, Fish and Wildlife, and EPA were transferred and/or directly pressured by superiors and proponent managers when their study results and recommendations were contrary to Two Forks. 8. About 11% of the total study cost was for management and extra legal monitoring by DWD and the Metro Providers to influence results and control concerned providers who relied on DWD's strategy and technical advice. 9. The EIS Water Supply Analysis did not include any of the safe annual yields from several more efficient and less damaging ongoing projects, including Thornton's City-Farm Recycling Project (60,000 af), Aurora's Arkansas Exchange Project (17,000 af), Arapahoe County's Union Park Storage Project from the untapped Gunnison (140,000 af), and DWD's Green Mountain Pumpback Project (120,000 af). 10. The critical 1984 Governor's Round Table and state legislative resolutions to dam the South Platte were engineered by representatives whose legal firm was receiving $millions from DWD's Two Forks effort. 11. The EIS cost of Two Forks does not include the construction and environmental cost of West Slope compensatory storage that LSD hastily promised the Colorado River District to resolve Two Forks water right litigation just prior to the December 1986 release of the Corps' Draft EIS. 12. The participating officer of the engineering firm hired by the Corps to write the "impartial" EIS had a Serious conflict of interest as an active board member of a water district promoting Two Forks. In spite of efforts to control study results, the EIS found Two Forks to be the most environmentally damaging of the limited options considered. State doesn't • need Two Forks The recent decision by Environ• mental Protection Agency Director • William Reilly to overturn the Two • Forks dam project is, perhaps, the . single most impressive action I r have seen from Washington in . many years. Reilly is to be corn- _ ° . mended for "bucking a stacked deck" and doing what is right, rather than what is expedient. Colorado does not need this dam. Rather, it nerds a comprehen- 0 rnmie ;III.) sive water plan for the future, y - which would recognize all of our DJ DJ water resources. To continue dewatering the already overbur- m ;> DI dened tipper Colorado River Basin Nil y when other excellent options are -•t CI available, such as the largely un- P.W r tapped tipper Gunnison River r 8 Basin, simply does not make sense. N Da Two Forks represents what is notIll 2 ' in elofa best interests,er nor till.1( - N S those of neighboring water corn- B pact states. i Reilly's decision will force Colo- a , ratio to assess all water resources, -a ^ z rather than bowing to the will, .[) C —.power and money of the Denver 8 Water Board, which continues toa try and push this project throughfis h ,' using political muscle. In addition, Al O •' Reilly's action will save one of the P 9 • best trout rivers in the state, and a ,,,.Nils Da canyon of inestimable scenic and z, ,1 n t' tourist:dollar value. It appears that the issue is now i aW becoming a partisan political foot- ci� CO ball. With global warming, oil tAd m • spills, acid rain, etc., much in the b e xi to. news, it's my opinion that ecologi- �y cal and environmental platforms t, 2 will determine the next set of eke- 0 - ' tinns, both in Colorado and nation• CO ally, The smart politician should weigh carefully the impact of backing this controversial project before"diving in." —. , Lastly, I would encourage other Coloradans to write, expressing their appreciation and support, to William Reilly, ndministrzttor, EPA, 1401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C; 20460. Send copies to your ,state and national elected officials,, as well. If the Denver Water Board •wins,Colorado loses. • —Douglas N.Barber Colorado Springs ,` _iE500RC. I w,ti, C„y''≤2 NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION • Vl '+-, .F 955 L'ENFANT PLATA, NORTH BLDG.,S.W. WASHINGTON,D.C.20024 (202)488.0610 Y J pion too.' siiiisH NATIONAL WATER LINE ...„) x F2 gPRIL.1989 r'� Cr);71 GROUNDWATER RESEAR �� If AND PROTECTION 101st CONGRESS REFOCUSES Although groundwater research and Interior will develop the assessment able private financing. Total federal protection may not be the highest program which will include: assisting funds will not exceed 50% of the priority for this session of the 101st state and local governments in project cost. EPA will also lead the Congress, bills promoting these is- groundwater assessment; coordi- risk assessment analysis and, within sues are being introduced and nating activities among fed- 24 months, will publish a list of not should not be ignored. Among the oral/stateilocal governments; pro- less than 30 analyzed contaminants. bills introduced, two deal primarily viding information regarding proto- DOI will lead assessment and EPA with groundwater research and a cols and quality controls; ream- will lead source control, mitigation, third promotes specific controls for mending protocols and providing remediation, and health and envi- pesticides in groundwater. guidance regarding data comparison. ronmental effects efforts. Both will HR 37 was introduced on January 3 The protocols shall not be binding or establish technical assistance pro- by Mr. Gejdenson (D-CT) with 15 retroactive; shall not be construed to grams among federal agencies and cosponsors. The bill has joint referral apply to or impair the validity of any to state and local governments to Interior, Public Works, Energy,and other protocols: and shall not be through grants, loans, cooperative Agriculture. HR 37 Is very similar to construed to alter lederal/state/local agreements, and contracts. Upon last year's HR 791 and divides re- authority to determine where use of state or local request, DOI or EPA sponsibilities primarily between DO1 such protocols is appropriate. The may make surveys or research into and EPA. Interior will lead the efforts program shall encourage use of ex- specific problems and make recom- , in research, investigations, ap- isting federal and State programs;as- mendations. There is a 50% cost praisals,and related activities with an sist in meeting CERCLA, Public share. Personnel training and tech- authorized appropriation of $413 Health, Solid Waste, Clean Water, nology transfer will also be available. million through FY 92. The bill es- and FIFRA requirements. DOI will lead establishment of a Na- tablishes an Interagency Groundwa- Research, development, and tional Groundwater Information ter Research Committee with mem- demonstration (RD&D) will be led by Clearinghouse. DOI will also work bers from EPA, DOI, DOA, and HHS. EPA, who will develop a program for with the Corps of Engineers to con- EPA and DO1 will serve as cochairs protection, management, and reme- sider the impact of proposed projects for the Committee which will Identify diation of groundwater resources. on groundwater resources and the data needs, facilitate cooperation, The program will demonstrate tech- feasibility of measures to replenish consult with all affected parties, and nologies effective in controlling and protect such resources, EPA will recommend priorities for assessment sources or mitigating contamination, make grants to establish and operate of groundwater resources based on Solicitations for demonstration proj- five groundwater research institutes. the use of such resources and the ect proposals will be accepted but no EPA will also make available, on a likelihood Of such resources being federal funds will be provided unless reimbursable basis,facilities and per- contaminated, the applicant cannot obtain reason- Continued on page 2 Continued from page 1 EPA will establish an ROW program Committee. There is a 60% federal sonnel of existing scientific labs and to: collect and make information share for all cooperative groundwater - research centers. available; cooperate with federal, mapping programs. Otherwise. pro- EPA will initiate a special study with state, and local governments and grams are dollar matching. Investiga- Los Angeles County to determine other appropriate parties; make tive programs for groundwater quality the feasibility of groundwater re- grants and fellowships; conduct in- and flow characteristics shall: deter- plenishment with treated wastewater, vestigations, research, and studies; mine the availability and chemical with particular emphasis on health conduct epidemiological studies on quality of aquifers;determine aquifer effects-related research as recom- groundwater contaminants and po- discharge and recharge; determine mended by the California State Sci- tential contaminants with HI-IS; de- aquifer stress response; develop entitle Advisory Panel on Groundwa- information on models for effects of human activi- ter Recharge, chemical, physical, and biological ties; and develop maps delineating The Department of Agriculture will contaminants affecting water quality; groundwater resources, aquifer sys- establish an Agricultural Nitrogen develop techniques and methods for terns,and recharge areas. Interior will Best Management Practices Task prevention, detection, and correc- establish a National Groundwater Force to: review the status of current tion of contamination; construct nec- Quantity and Quality Assessment information on the relationship be- essary facilities; and acquire secret Program to identify, assess, and tween agricultural nitrogen and water processes. monitor quantity and quality and de- quality for both surface and ground- EPA will also establish a media-spe- scribe changes and trends. water; develop and improve best cific research committee for ground- The Bureau of Reclamation shall re- management practices, systems,and water resources and make an annual search the effects of existing and technologies; and develop educa- report that will serve as the manage- proposed dams/reservoirs/water di- tional and training materials. ment plan for the groundwater re- version projects on local and regional The bill also contains a provision for search program of the Agency. This groundwater recharge, the effects EPA grant assistance to local gov- plan is the basis for appropriations on aquifer quality and quantity, and ernments in demonstrating mitigation determinations. EPA will appoint a effects on surface streams, rivers, of radium contamination in ground- Groundwater Research Manager in and lakes. A Groundwater Reclama- water. The grants for small the Office of Research and Devel- tion Study will be prepared and in- communities, are available only to opment to carry out the management elude: assessment of impacts of ex- provide insurance or prepay interest plan. He will also be the liaison with isting and proposed projects on for local obligations to finance the the Clearinghouse Committee. groundwater quality and quantity; acquisition or installation of treatment EPA will publish a list of known con- analyses of regional water budgets technologies or to pay administrative taminants to be reviewed and revised and impact of projects under varying costs for program financing estab- annually. The list includes contami- annual weather conditions; descrip- lishment. nants that: require a national primary lions 01 optimizing Bureau project S 203, The Groundwater Research, drinking water regulation under Continued on page 4 Management, and Education Act of SDWA;require a health advisory from 1988, was Introduced by Senator the Office of Drinking Water; those Burdick (D-ND) on January 25. The listed under CERCLA for groundwa- NATIONAL WATER LINE bill, which had ten cosponsors, was ter; those listed under sec. 307 of - USPS 10 referred to Environment and Public CWA; pesticides with leaching po- Works. The bill calls for the estab- tential;and any contaminant found in Raymond R.Rummonds groundwater samples at three or PRESIDENT waternl 01 an Interagency Ground more locations or is listed under sec. James W.Trull water Task Force with members from 104 of CERCLA. Each listed con- VICE PRESIDENT EPA (chair), DOI, DOA, National SG- Ivan W,Flint ence Foundation, Energy, Defense, taminant will receive a proposed re- TREASURER and HRS. The Task Force would search program that will include suffi- Thomas F. Donnelly serve as the coordinating vehicle for dent information to prepare a risk as- EXEC. VICE PRESIDENT several other to-be-established sessment, EPA will conduct national agencies such as an Advisory Com- groundwater quality surveys for: Bridget O'Grady mittee on Groundwater Research pesticide applications; septic tanks EDITOR and cesspools; landfills, surface im- representing state and local views, a NATIONAL WATER LINE is a monthly Clearinghouse Committee facilitating poundments and waste piles; publication of the National Water coordination of information systems, agricultural drainage we fertilizer Resources Association, 955 L'Enfant and an Education Committee which applications: irrigation return flows; Plaza, Suite 1202, Washington, DC would evaluate existing academic and publicly owned treatment plants. 20024, for the benefit of NWRA training programs. Authorization of Nitrates, nitrosamines, and other members and associates, Repro- $3 million for each year FY 89-93 is metabolites of nutrients and nitrogen duction of this newsletter, in whole or requested for these programs. compounds in public or private part, is expressly prohibited unless The bill amends the Water Re- drinking water supplies will be stud- prior permission is obtained from the sources Research Act of 1984 to ied as well, Association. Subscription rate is provide DOI grants for research insti- DOI will undertake hydrologic re- $150 annually, third class postage search and will appoint a Groundwa- paid, Inquiries and address changes lutes on a matching dollar basis for should be sent to the above address • direct cost expenditure reimburse- ter Research Manager who serves sas e or telephoned to(202)488.0610. ment liaison to the Clearinghouse -2- . WASHINGTON OFFICE REORGANIZES RESPONSIBILITIES In order to maximize NWRA lobbying activities, the following plan has been developed and approved by the Board of Directors. Effective January 1, 1989,the Washington, DC office will utilize all four full-time staff members as professionals (non-cleri- cal). Each will also be responsible for a share of the clerical and odd-job type assignments. This concept calls for Elizabeth • Singleton to devote full time to the daily administration of the Association, organization of seminars and conferences, and the financial accounting. Bridget O'Grady, Susan Till, and Tom Donnelly will perform the function of representing and pro- moting the Association's position on Capitol Hill and with the Administration. Because our members demand much more of NWRA than they have in the past, the next few years will be the most legislatively challenging NWRA has ever faced. Under the new plan,each member of the staff will have primary responsi- bility for the activities ot: government agencies,Congressional committees, and NWRA committees. Below is an outline of the initial assignments for each staff member. ADMINISTRATION STANDING HOUSE COMMITTEE& The White House Donnelly Agriculture O'Grady Department of Agriculture O'Grady Appropriations All Department of Energy O'Grady Energy and Water Development Donnelly Department of Interior Donnelly Interior Till Bureau of Reclamation Donnelly Rural Development,Agriculture and O'Grady Fish and Wildlife Service Till Related Agencies U.S. Geological Service O'Grady Budget All Department of Justice Donnelly Energy and Commerce O'Grady Environmental Protection Agency O'Grady Interior and Insular Affairs Donnelly Federal Energy Regulatory Commission O'Grady U.S. Army Corps of Engineers O'Grady Energy and the Environment Till National Parks and Public Lands Till Water and Power Resources Donnelly ' STANDING SENATE COMMITTEES: Merchant Marine and Fisheries Till Public Works and Transportation O'Grady Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry O'Grady Ways and Means O'Grady Agricultural Production and O'Grady Stabilization of Prices Agricultural Research,Conservation, Till NWRA Committees: Forestry and General Legislation Rural Development and Rural O'Grady Budget and Finance Singleton Electrification Executive Committee Donnelly Appropriations Donnelly Resolutions O'Grady Agriculture and Related Agencies O'Grady Project Development and Financing Donnelly Energy and Water Development Donnelly Environmental Till Interior Till Small Projects Donnelly Budget All Water Quality O'Grady ,• Energyg and Natural Resources Donnelly Water ou wale Till Groundwater O'Grady Energy Regulation and Conservation O'Grady Energy Issues O'Grady Public Lands Till Legal Donnelly Water and Power Donnelly Steering Donnelly Environment and Public Works O'Grady State Executives Council Donnelly Environmental Protection O'Grady/110 Membership and Public Relations Singleton Water Resources, Transportion and O'Grady Reclamation Reform Act Donnelly - Infrastructure Litigation Review Donnelly Toxic Substances, Environmental Till Water Industry Coordination O'Grady Oversight and Research and Development Superfund, Oceans and Water O'Grady Protection BOLD denotes primary point of contact. Finance All -3- Continued from page 2 Each state strategy should identify: a The Safe Drinking Water Act would operations to ameliorate adverse im- lead agency; legal authorities; major be amended to include requirements pacts; analysis of the potential for sources of groundwater contamina- for groundwater residue guidance groundwater recharge facilities and tion; assure coordination among levels. The Clean Water Act would the need to demonstrate artificial federal/state/local agencies; assure be amended to include nonpoint recharge technologies under a vari- coordination of groundwater protec- source control of groundwater con- ety of hydrogeologic conditions; tion programs with surface water pro- tamination by pesticides. analysis of federal assistance to state grams and public water protection and local artificial recharge facilities programs. No eligible state shall re- and technologies; and a description ceive less than $75,000 or one-half NWRA Su Summer Meeting: of available federal technical assis- of 1%, whichever is greater,or more SEE YOU IN MONTANA! lance on economic engineering and than 10% of the total allotment. A other factors relating to design and grant shall not exceed 50% of the construction of groundwater man- cost of carrying out the program dur- NWRA will host its 1989 Western agement facilities. ing a one year period. No funds may Water Seminar in Whitefish, Montana Agriculture will investigate and ana- be used to comply with SDWA, at the Grouse Mountain Lodge from lyze the relationship between CERCLA, TSCA, CWA, or Solid August 9 through 12 (program agricultural practices and groundwa- Waste Disposal Act requirements. events August 10.11). ter use, including causes, effects, EPA will also assist small communi• THE TRAVEL NETWORK CORPO- prevention, detection, and correc- ties (less than 20,000 population) in RATION will handle hotel reserva- tion of groundwater contamination demorstrating mitigation of radium tions for all registrants and offers which results, or may result, from contamination in groundwater, special airfares as well. Delta Airlines agricultural practices including stor- The third bill, HR 599, the Ground- is the official carrier for this meeting age, preparation, application and water Safety Act of 1989, was intro- and extends to NWRA flyers dis- disposal (including back-syphoning duced on January 20 by Mr. Oberstar counts of 40%off regular coach fares and rinsing and disposal of contain- (D-MN) and was referred jointly to and 5% off their best fares. Those ers). DOA will also develop an RD&D Agriculture, Energy, and Public people staying over on Saturday program for impacts of practices Works. The bill amends FIFRA in that night, April 12, will be rewarded not (including feedlot operation) on it requires registrants to take certain only by receiving 50% off a regular groundwater quality. precautions against leaching poten- fare, but will also enjoy a group trip to EPA will establish a Western Center tial for pesticides. However, the bill Glacier National Park on Saturday for and Groundwater Re- also calls for each state to prepare a morning. search Nuclear Nevada by a program to prevent surface and Reserve early by calling TRAVEL Board e composed inva of governedNevada, by a groundwater pollution by those peS- NETWORK at (800) 631-9675. USGS, Reclamation, Environmental ticides having leaching potential. Lodge rates are $65 single/double Research Center, UNLV, UN-Reno, The programs must include a pesti- plus tax. Kitchen and Whirlpool DOE, and Desert Research Institute, tide inventory; identification of areas Suites are also available at$100 and EPA will make grants to states to of use; identification of prevention $125. respectively. Program details support development and processes; and a schedule for im- and Seminar registration forms for implementation of state strategies. w;th a 50%cosn. t share. National be available this meeting will be National Water Line, in May's -4- NATIONAL WATER LINE I Bulk Rate I U.S. Postage PAID +.wu Clarksburg. MD '?. s' `kl NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION Permit No. 10 \; +. 955 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20024 ..,..,....e„, • Meld Coot, Comisiosers 407 P, 0. Box 738 Creel'', CO 80632 a •'\, ;9S' ,',P^ 26 IN 2: 14 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OFHAQN,WAYS 001T Or 4201 East Arka�pQrl�rF. n n,,..1 .f '\ Denver, CoioraHb'8b2Yl °�- •`� (303) 757-9011g �w cow 2760K April 18, 1989 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Commissioners: In February 1989, the Colorado State Highway Commission set an obligation limitation on Federal-Aid Urban System (FAUS) funds. This letter is to inform you of the impacts of the established obligation limitation and to reflect the most recent balance of unobligated FAUS funds, as of February 28, 1989 (Federal Dollars Only) , which are eligible to be obligated to new projects. Greeley Urban Area Pool $88,517 In addition, you may borrow on future year allocations on a first come first serve basis, as long as FAUS funds are available. An obligation of 90 percent of fiscal years 1990 and 1991 non-attributable FAUS funds will be allowed to facilitate projects. This will make an additional $170,464 and $192,717 for FY90 and FY91 respectively available for immediate programming. Dollars shown represent 90 percent of available funds. These figures do not reflect obligation limitations which may be imposed in those future years. 56e-0Z sZera• C' 2 /O- April 18. 1989 Page Two If you have any questions concerning the amount or the FADS Program, please contact Mr . Bob Sakaguchi at 757-9261. Questions concerning what type of construction projects qualify for use of FAUS funds and procedures to obligate funds for anticipated projects on the Urban System within the Urban Boundary should be directed to the State Highway District Engineers office in your area. Very t my your Tom Talmadge, P. E. Manager Program Support Branch Division of Transportation Development tts,..0. ►. late AGENDA WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 2, 1989 Planning Commission Members are reminded that you are to call BOBBIE GOOD 356-4000, Extension 4400, if you cannot attend the luncheon and/or meeting. 12:00 noon - Weld County Planning Commission Luncheon - May 2, 1989, Raddison Inn, 701 8th Street, Greeley, Colorado * * * x I: * * * * * * * * * * Ir * * * * * * * is * t * * * * * * * 1:30 p.m. - Public Meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission, County Commissioners' Hearing Room (#101) , 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. ROLL CALL Bud Halldorson, Chairman Ernie Ross, Vice-Chairman Jerry Burnett Lynn Brown Rick Iverson Jerry Kiefer LeAnn Reid Ivan Gosnell Ann Garrison 1. CASE NUMBER: Z-449 APPLICANT: Harold Reese. Jr. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LBCAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10, and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25. 2. CASE NUMBER: Amend USR-726 APPLICANT: Ralph Nix Produce, Incorporated REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amendment co a Special Review permit to vacate Development Standard #4 which required screening on the south and east property lines. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 14, T4N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the Town of Gilcrest, approximately 3 miles southwest of the Town of LaSalle, north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 44, and east of Highway 85. Planning Commission Agenda May 2, 1989 Page 2 3. CASE NUMBER: USR-878 APPLICANT: Daniel Ochsner and Barry Payant REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility located in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 31, part of the SE} of Section 30, and part of the SWL of Section 29, all in T5N, R65W of the 6th P.N. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 700 feet south of the Town of Evans, approximately 2,100 feet north of the Town of LaSalle, west of Highway 85, and north of Weld County Road 394. ti, ,6 / r i ILA l liliy nn ;;�s ;^ ?6 r`' ' S ti CLFR7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of (V ��'=z. ��%�'„nLJ 1000 10TH STREET. GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (303) 350-9780 Greeley April 26, 1989 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners: Please find enclosed a report which summarizes the anticipated impacts that might be realized as a result of the request by Monfort of Colorado, Inc. to annex into the City of Greeley. This report has been prepared in accordance with standards specified in Senate Bill 45. As required in the bill this impact summary is presented to the Board of County Commissioners. The anticipated City Council review schedule for this annexation is as follows: 1 . May 2, 1989 -- Introduction and first reading of the annexation ordinance 2. May 16, 1989 -- Public hearing and final reading of the annexation ordinance If you have any questions in regard to this matter please call me at 350-9783. Sincerely, Stephen V. Hill Planning Administrator SVH/cs /`z. ) , i el0P4 5747 I I a MONFORT LAMB PLANT ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT APRIL 20, 1989 OVERVIEW: Name of proposed annexation - Monfort Lamb Plant Location - Generally south of the Poudre River and east of 8th Avenue Acreage - 44.2 acres ANNEXATION MAP: Please find the enclosed map (Attachment A) showing the area proposed for annexation along with the boundary of all adjacent incorporated lands. PREANNEXATION AGREEMENT: A preannexation agreement (Attachment T3) was approved between Monfort Inc. and the City of Greeley on February 7, 1989. EXISTING CITY SERVICES AVAILABLE: Currently the following City services are available to the area proposed to be annexed: A. Fire protection B. Water C . Sewer (Provided by the Lone Tree Sewer Treatment Plant ) D. Public Street E. All other City services, such as access to cultural facilities, that are not geographically defined. Attachment C shows: A. The present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls, other utility lines and ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity of • the proposed annexation. ADDITIONAL SERVICES PLANNED: The City 's Mid Range Expected Service Area for 1993 shows that this annexation is outside of the Mid Range Expected Service Boundary. No additional services are needed or anticipated. LAND USES IN THE VICINITY OF THE AREA PROPOSED TO DE ANNEXED: Attachment D shows the principal land uses in the vicinity of this annexation. The City 's Comprehensive Plan of 1986 is a policy plan, and as such, does not prescribe specific land uses for each parcel of land. In reviewing the policies presented in this plan it is reasonable to assume that industrial will be the dominant land use in the area. TAXING DISTRICTS AFFECTED: The area proposed to be annexed is located within the following tax districts: -- Northern Colorado Water District -- North Weld County Water -- Western Hills Fire -- School District #6 -- Aims Junior College -- Weld County Library District EFFECT ON LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: Development within this proposed annexation is not anticipated to generate any new dwelling units or students, and consequently, should not have any negative impact on School District 416. ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES: According to the City 's Comprehensive Plan of 1986 the following environmental features are present: A . Topography - 0 to 1 .5% slope B. Wetlands - Outside of designated wetland. C . Floodplain - Outside of 100-year floodplain D. Gravel Resource - Within floodplain and terrace gravel deposit. E . Important Wildlife - Outside of key wildlife area ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TEAM COMMENTS: The Administrative Review Team reviewed this request for annexation on March 29, 1989 (See Attachment E) . The following are the key comments from this meeting: 1 . Available fire flow to the southern part of the property may not be sufficient to meet City standards. One additional fire hydrant plus looping the water line may be necessary to provide adequate protection. 2. 6th Avenue does not comply with City construction and right-of-way standards. 3. The Building Department will need to inspect the buildings in order to be able to issue a City certificate of occupancy. ATTACHMENT A • '\ \Ikr.‘ . ost. \ I FWD t. \ `:a \ I GIiEEL iI:\ -PI POSE• ' "Ic1AL -� ANNE ‘ TION .� - �..., :,.r 'c^rid in r „r, . ' ', I I l soli I. , I 11.-.-1111 � »Iii-: • �', � 1 n''" yllr;o 11'I s •� 1� 1.1. --.--_._ - „:;c • •.;= -- � , \ T• _ , "1111 III q _ 1E1 J rr;l. ... l tla.te„' . . 11 .__� 11,.� .�.,•.� ,. 111 .,... .�=I.Lp;�•?i�:,xa;l.l•I•�II• h !'; 1, 1 To�" ."v..''I .,._ If.»..Ill r„tl". ; .ffl ,,,. ..� I I;I 1 �� • if :I y. __..._ - -- % 1 ern -lif M.:4' 1•I fill' it. ,-;--.• .... ••;/ I. _ •IIt.:.'. i1' i ;I ' I • 11 • _ h I 1:- .:_:,___.--..........2-.74_,,,i.:' . f I I r't I?, ;-'r H .1 1. e . I ' ; II • , II • • II ' III , • IIll ; II ,;;liIII ' c ,• :•/•\. 1 1 1:411:::.'L,1?• . .• . I . .II. I .. • I I •• . I I • . ' I VII 1•; ,.. 11•. r ,,I,lil► i CI ._\. 0 . 1 1 . \ 1 1 l`)i - !t': I ' •.. I II•.� ► I', ; II.: ; ill. ' . .•1 ',;I} II1•l,1l -�_ \- t ‘ • • I ...I:�. I . I I • ... I l• . •I I•. . •I I•; •I I•. . .•i I•: " ' f�;I I . , .•I ., ==r. . J1...."•:'"�� j'' •��,•`it ' � '~' I I T� I i ` I N'l�l t'u�!4 ill flII��IH I IIIH 1I�1I I11tIt1H \°� '` ' 11:' ' II . 1I'...._• I • ..• II•.. .. 11•'.- I Ele" I •':: I Ir:1 ['IN N la-J [HUH 1'71 GI 1.1 JA I I MCMIVItIV I b _ PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this `i{)` day of r�s+s-iu , 1989 , by and between the City of Greeley, a ColoradoQmunicipal corporation ("City") and the Monfort, Inc. , a Delaware corporation ("Monfort") . WHEREAS, Monfort wishes to continue to connect its fire protection service to the City water system and the City wishes to provide such water at non-resident usage rates to Monfort pending Monfort' s annexation to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Monfort agrees to apply for or consent to the annexation to the City of Greeley within one hundred twenty (120) days of execution of this Agreement, all property as described below: A tract of land being a part of Lot 4 and of Lot 1 of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE4 SW4) and all part of Lot 4 of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE4) NW4) , all in Section 32 , Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, according to the subdivision of lands by the Union Colony of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a pin and cap (NHPQ No. 2682) denoting the Southeast Corner of said Lot 4 of the Union Colony of Colorado and considering the South line of Lot 4 in the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NE4) SW4) to bear North 84° 05 ' 46" West, with all other bearings contained herein being relative thereto: Thence South 84° D5 ' 46" East along the South line of Lot 3 a distance of 53 .80 feet to a point on the East right-of-way line of Gth Avenue which is the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 01° 08 ' 46" West along said East right-of-way line of 6th Avenue a distance of 233 . 69 feet to a point of curvature; Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 396 .00 feet and whose long chord bears North 24° 48 ' 03" West 310 .08 feet an arc distance of 318 . 59 feet; Thence North 06° 19 ' 49" East, a distance of 199 . 97 feet; Thence North 03° 56 ' 35" East, a distance of 203 . 22 feet; i Thence North 02° 16 ' S0" East, a distance of 421.96 feet to a point on the North line of Lot 1; Thence South 83° 17 ' 02" East, a distance of 33 .39 feet to a No. 4 rebar with no cap and denoting the center of said Section 32 , Township 6 North, Range 65 west; Thence North 02° 12 ' 29" West, a distance of 658 . 14 feet to a No. 4 rebar with cap (No. 7242) denoting the Northwest Corner of Lot 4 in the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE:) NW') , Section 32 , Township 6 North, Range 65 west; Thence North 85° 00 ' 10" West, a distance of 1072.55 feet to a point on the west right-of-way line of Union Pacific Railroad; Thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 5529. 65 feet and whose long chord bears South 07° 02 ' 19" East, 759.98 feet an arc distance of 760 . 58 feet; Thence South 03° 05 ' 54" East, a distance of 1231. 32 feet; Thence South 84° 05' 46" East, a distance of 934 .36 feet to the true Point of Beginning. Containing 44 . 1866 acres, more or less, and subject to all rights-of-way, casements, and encumbrances of record. 2 . Monfort has the right to continue to tie the Monfort fire protection service to the City' s water system and use City water pending annexation to the City or termination of this Agreement. 3 . Monfort agrees to pay to the City the standard rate charged to non-resident water customers of the City for any and all water used, consumed, or delivered for Monfort' s fire protection system by the City during the one hundred twenty (120) day pre-annexation period in addition to the applicable meter quarterly base rate. 4 . Amendments will be proposed by the City Staff to the Greeley Water and Sewer Board and the City Council to amend raw water requirements currently mandated for annexation to the City. The amendments will propose changing the water requirement from strictly a flat rate of 3 acre feet per annexed acre to a rate based on water delivered to the industry annexed. All amendments are subject to the approval of the Water and Sewer Board and the City Council. (Monfort' s agreement to apply for or consent to annexation is contingent upon the City Council 's adoption of such amendments. ) 5 . Ail Greeley Municipal Code ordinances will be in effect and applicable to the area, once annexed. 6 . The parties agree that it is their intention to complete annexation of the subject property prior to June, 1989. In the event that annexation is not completed by that date due to the failure of the City expeditiously to pursue such annexation or otherwise, and Monfort is experiencing difficulty obtaining an adequate water supply for its daily lamb plant operations from its current supplier, North Weld Water District, due to irrigation demands on the North Weld System, the parties agree that Monfort may request emergency City water service for its daily operations in addition to fire protection, and shall pay for the non-resident water customer rate for any and all water so used, consumed or delivered pending annexation. 7 . This agreement shall terminate, in the event all conditions of such annexation are not met and approved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties within the one hundred twenty (120) day period specified in this agreement. In the event Monfort is responsible for the failure to meet the conditions of annexation, then, in that event, upon the termination of this agreement, Monfort agrees to immediately and physically disconnect its fire protection service from the City' s water system. 8 . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary hcreinabove contained, this contract may be extended beyond the one hundred twenty (120) day pre-annexation period by mutual agreement of the parties. The parties affix their respective signatures the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF GREELEY MONFORT, INC. ke,Si121 J,.c.. E/n' ) By �' AW S/ 1 a \'. . • , 1. ".. _ _.. u n✓ n,„,, was u. . \11 -.._.�..... .- --. - 11 1 I . MI 7,0 3r JZ --- ��- . Jr JJ PUU ▪ MONFORT LAMB PLANT • ANNEXATION r ` 1 A' (ITV ov . r‘ 4,f, ', \ GREELEY, COLD =_iit,l- 1 .N 4, , � \\ • 4k r,'+ OFFICIAL PROI3ERI �- ' •rt I l AA I I t' -" I 1 l. 1 I • ,' k�:_ -•) 1 ; ., I .0 "„ qrc !Ella I II, y1�,,,N L I Y I ✓Ir. ,y-.. - 1 1 \ N1.✓ • I `' . III•r- TI''"'" I . `�. •,il 11 I I•It:. f,1+-1;_1•1:111. I. I 1 II:I�\` 1 1~i I i ' I .II.. P1 II:" I'Inil CC'�)) ' ' 11 1 I l• 1 / .,• t Ifl :"II'u;t ,I:I.I' , II.'(1 II ;n'':, 1 I :.!'2 ' ! I • I IIL:,1�l?: • •r :.l[lIL I r.. 1.4.I 1,L_: 1, • ,! f i, \ ;1 ti ' I,h • it .I�1 1 L-' r` X1'1 P., ��' i• 'j ! I II • . II ' ; II • : Ill. ' IIii:•I( ,` 11!Liill ' 01 ;t„ \�\^ •• ;1 �. I : _ I . • I I ' • II • . ► ► • , • 1I • ,.. ii'; Hl•; , ,- ,Iiiillllrlrl -\ ., i 1 I•I'l , l " It II . I V . I I., ; , 11�+•f,: 11'1.,; 1 I•} .., 'd c1U 1.11,1:I — 1. ••\ \ 1, `l9 g I • • I I • • II. •1 I. •I Vs., •1 I•, . .'I ll ?Lir):T I? .•I , 1 ' 1 r IIi':;I I • J I: ' 11 I.; ', I f I Ili,ill III; III NIW1�JIII '•111 II I1I I NIT III •_\ ` �. 11 . lI ' •' I • I I I,•I I.;`• •I I iIi I f! .'4 III 1114 WINN Jinni.' i I.1 [Main ., 1 • ' 11 : Ill;•....._,, I e I l',..; 1 V. I I•..I '. I ".,. ,,•,,,� LII III � t r �,-••; � �'`�. I I rI III III Fl ``.1 �. �. . --_... (J . in. th.. . I • . 11•. . :I i•:' •1 ri.....ui I i.•• •;I G;'��.L,i,ll BIIpI, 11:5 .1 PH iiGil'{001 . "" "I' , ATTACHMENT C MAJOR FACILITIES ` 1- y 00 1. N.W. CORNER IOT 4 ••;?n v,, ii, ,,, 95.0 l I OUNU NO. 4 RCOAR WWI CA '•<aYyii::•i:•:tti:. @Y..- ::ir.. ....U�('1O" W. (N0. 7292 O t �.i: - :�•1':4 1'.M1ti{1:T:.:Y:}4�tii�ti:a yy::l.:::: y.::'::. .t' w y•..`ti`:;.,.a iiti;i .\iq:..�.:;i:tei:'::•;�,•.. �_— tti2:t ti 1._'y._�',.t};ti ply �:N. '}yRK 'y v: J . .`i: t. ::i3.: s `;n rn r I INr r Tn �_ ,,,,fi�tc•• >}ri}' zk�.•'+ti o r .::'!MME•£::,:... ..2 ti". f%'•`•yi ?�:i �:•.k:g`:;ti1 =isx:::h`Gii2i:iE:'S`.=:;laiiiv-`i.;:ai. • s��NON111WESt UUARIER ui . E.Y1571NR oRCCIEY , y:1\:;: p y � ;i ..,44y}: •:1 Y:{.:-afiti:. clIV LIMBS ni . •'i:Si``:':;:: :iiy':`•:;i; }i•:}; :: >ii:its: :% c^<i p ti:;K: yti; 4as}'tiv ':y;:%ii:��i:4✓.}}':i}: ': r+i:)y"..• :Y� :F?2Y�'Y:#;':;i;'i%::{:i•'r?E `t?ii: �:i(�'i;{fit;; IE . 5529.Gri •i.•i:,' YI A . 7'5?'5I" � 'cat::;'.;ti:`v? .'»>;aria::i:-:v::;>a:>i:{:y::;.:��y?. L . 'MO.90' nl ::} i }}:`vi?:*i.:'i :i:tii::•::•:.la: 1 " ;Iro 119' V '11 L s 759.70' $ '='$': .. S. 0:5'1 TO?" C. 35 i`•:S•.ii " I ''a : ; I(I.NIE.I? Or .y I? _ • tOUNU NO.9 RLUAR imik ip_ 3t i . s U :Y: R_ � , - ` SOUTHWEST OU T H IES Or AR G EEI.F_Y ( ! 1 n IO RA CK ncl< SOU I W 1 1 LSI (W ARIER I CR ANNE Xnl ION I H. rr ::: :113 ►nch forced ' � eee •• er main ii: -iC 1'}}::JY:::�iy:-':::-:;:... .::i tit:p;.aihti: :�:izt>:'t)Sc..;i1; r . rn9o• CII . 310.U0' S:c O �'(�I!;. V ;� CAVE N G Q17°11'46" G H W• c .{� n :;�'iYic`.'5�''i: S:3''`i'i 233-69 box T 4:1) `' ₹al)2 S.r. CORNER I Or 9 1.. n9-o.96'• E /� WIUNIT NO. 4 REMIT I 1 55.00' `v WAIT CAI` I I EXISTING ( " I (NO. 2G02) I CITY LIMO \ 12U( I -' ,� - \� �A1 It.O C :1 I:W� �I {�I ! C) _ I C I_ INS CO I O i Ta I J . ATTACHMENT D PREDO li N NT EXISTING LAN USES __________.,_,.„._. ,..„.c...._.._.. ...____._ ._____. .-.-.._-. AGRICULTURAL \\\o s r. \1 I2, 20 73; i 37 33 INDUSTRIAL AGRICULTURAL I -..., :_ rif II LIT • - �,' 7 -� . \ + GItEELGY, f *-P POSE icIAL PRI _ N N r -� 1 "iC^L.�IE lA 1'O11 ir,-- Ion I - rr ^ �. : •:;.lrr•',....i...:2-..--; i .._� ,;. '. , g AGRICULTURAL I' RESIDENTIAL &i i l� 1 `• t% t TT . - Ic STRIAL.0, 0.:1.1;.11' _ ,n I :., ;�,:1-e• ;• )• • 1 i . �- L._ , to 1" III• mil �. I .. 0%41 ) O%4 1 o ;..._ III '�I. s • • I- �', 1�: �� =1. -- . �A• ..' L.•I , �' .. % I a 7 ' 101 - 1 „. rl r • I 11...• _ 11 I ' .. . .I III I•._N ± 1. ..�I ,qi IIill I I 1 • . I I : ► I I I I I1`,hk, ,!:s,.il t " ;�►.IHI CI• I .. •.IL_ .•11 • 11_ 11 rIlrr ll ; , , ,,,, i - .p a? \ ,. . I;4 : t 1• . Il ' , IP I1' .11I' , •11 }e ! 1 , , ',lip!' 1.111:1 -. f\ r :P 'I . _i I ..' i I s._ 1 I'._ •I I•. _. I I ' _•I I . ..-.l I : ' ;i ILA , '_ - site- , '� 'rim-i I'• I , I I I ' 111•' ' 11."'W1,1 F11111111 Hi:,dal 111111111 clu4;I I I t mil„n \,` � I ;I IllI" ! I ! I T,:I VI' .119111H f...! H HI 14 HIII IH • II HI H HI1tH8 , 4' 1 I p.. I i....1:;,.:11:,111,21. 1 • :.. 1 1.....'1 I•,.. 1 f.,lA.".1 1 v.7. 111;11 k!711!I '1'SJ 11IUIII 171 _4,,1 ` \Irrl 1 I • • • ATTACHMENT E ART MINUTES Administrative Review Team Page 1 March 29. 1989 II . ANNEXATION REQUEST BY MONFORT OF COLORADO Location: East of 6th Avenue and north of the Caohe la Poudre A review of the annexation timetable and the anticipated process for the annexation of Monfort of Colorado, Inc. lamb plant into the City of Greeley was provided by Planning Administrator, Steve Hill. Kay Norton, attorney for Monfort, stated that the annexation should assure Monfort of adequate water to their lamb plant- Ms. Norton stated that the sewage was being treated by the Lone Tree Sewage Plant which Monfort has agreed to purchase from the City. Ms. Norton stated that there are 150 employees anticipated at the lamb plant. Duane Scheel, Battalion Chief for the Fire Department , stated that he was concerned about adequate fire protection for the southern building which was previously owned by Todd. Mr. Scheel suggested that in order to provide adequate water flow and hydrant spacing that the water lines should be looped and one additional hydrant should be installed. Mr. Scheel indicated that the Fire Department would work with Monfort to coordinate a flow test to determine what sort of water pressure there was in the area. Bill Hanger Traffic Engineer, stated that the dedication of right-of-way should be for 60 ' along 6th Avenue and that the road is not to City specifications at this time. Dan Correll , Chief Building Inspector, stated that he did not anticipate any structural problems or building code related problems but would like to review the inside of the lamb plant to be able to provide a City issued certificate of occupancy. Mr. Correll stated that the Building Inspection Department would like to inspect all buildings located on this annexation in conjunction with the Fire Department . The Building Inspection Department suggested that Building and Fire Code compliance should be a condition of this annexation. There were no other concerns, issues or comments provided. lS/_r STATc F.C LOIAJDO COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH h" ". 17 owl 4210 East 11th Avenue CLt v( TO � Denver, Colorado 80220 THE i^ wg�' ta Phone (301) 320.9333 �Af'cD �t�i /876 e Roy Romer April 25, 1989 Governor Thomas M.Vernon,M.D. Executive Director Weld County Commissioners 915 10th St. Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Letter of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage Sludge in Weld County from the City of Westminster Dear County Commissioners: The Permits and Enforcement Section of the Colorado Department of Health has received a Letter of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage Sludge from the above referenced entity for the following site within your county. Site Name Legal Description Weld County Investors Site South Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26; the Northwest Quarter. South Half of the Northeast Quarter, and portions of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, all within Township 1 North, Range 68 West If you would like any additional information as to the scope and nature of this beneficial use land application project, do not hesitate to contact me at (303) 331-4555. Please direct any comments or concerns to this office within 15 days of receipt of this letter. Sincerely, d )1:1;e1P6IPet-2 David R. Rogers Engineering/Physical Sciences Technician Permits and Enforcement Section WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION xc: Weld County Health Department Soil Conservation District Victor Sainz, District Engineer File (Site # 0315) , a 029 614,- • To: Vrc4ar S94Nz, , a.E. i . ' r 411:14\ CITY of WESTMINSTER April 19, 1989 R _, j-a Prrht,c Wen A%a !(Motley Colorado Department of Health APR 2 4 19$9 4MOWVur92ndA'wuie 4210 East 11th Avenue Wesmiinwe,.Crdnr'adrr Denver , CO 80220 WOOD r AO? 430 4302ap9 Dear Mr , Hegeman : Enclosed is a letter of Intent that I am filing for approximately 410 acres of dryland wheat acreage _ Owned by Weld County Investors and farmed by LeS Shannon . If you have any questions Or concerns. Please feel free to contact me at 430-2400 extension 2500. - Sin ereiy, Ca I Hill Utilities Plant Operations Coordinator CH/ Is 4 CITY of WESTMINSTER April 20, 1989 Puhlir IIbtA,i,,,,I l"ililii s ./moiveocimhiwww Weld County Health Department Environmental Health Division ,euntn 1516 Hospital Road Greeley, CO 80631 Attn : Scott Perkins Dear Mr . Perkins: Enclosed for your review is a letter of Intent that the City of Westminster Is filing with the Colorado Health Department for approximately 410 acres of dryland In Weld County as described . If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 430-2400 extension 2500. SI cerely , ' , Ca I Hill Utilities Plant Operations Coordinator CH/ Is cc : Phil Hegeman, Colorado Department of Health LETTER OF INTENT SUBMITTAL FORM Producer : Landowner : ( for grades 16, Facility Name: City of Westminster 11 and fit sludge) Big Dry Creek Plant Name: Weld County Investors Address: t315O N . Huron Address : 6825 F. Tennessee Avenue Westminster . f:nlorAdn RA2f14 Rldn . 1 Suite 235 Denver CO 80020 Phone: 457-R01O Phone: 333-1452 Authorized Representative: Authorized Representative: sari Hill Les Shannon Address : 6777 W. 88th Avenue Address : 14800 N. WashlnotQn Phone : 930-2400 Fxt . 2500 Phone. 451-5'155 1 . Legal description of site location, including county, township, range. Section, quarter section: NnrkL WeS " a. County - Weld, townshln 1 . range 68. secti00 26 . SW 1/4. S 1/2 b . S'�inty - Weld . Sownsnla 1 range 6R - ser.tlon 35. NW 1 /4 . All C, QQynty - weld. township 1 . canoe SR . section 35 NE 1 /4 S 1 /2 d. county - Weld _ tnwnshln 1 ranee 68. section 35 Se 1 /4 . N 1 /2 Partial 2 . The proposed loading rate in terms of . pounds or tons of sludge per acre: loading rates for fields will be Cairtlieted by takinn sail smmolfs of fields before application takes nlare. From these analyses . nitrnnna reaulrements for o?trticular nrpns to be nrown will be determined by utilizing "The nulde to Fertilizer Rerommenbatlons In rolorad0" .published pv CSu, Analyses are then performed on sludge to determine nitrogen content ana rn !CU intions made to detect' , acronomic _Apo ilcat_lon rates . 3 . The crops to be grown an acreage of each crop: Ail acreage at this nartieular site will be utlll7ed for drviand wheat . 4 . The grade of sludge ( 1 , Ii , III ) as determined by the criteria in Table 1 , Section 3.A: As per attached sludge screenJng analysis . sludge would b.e considered S;rnde 1 5 . Analyses demonstrating the stability of the sludge: Ac stated In Seetlon 4. sludge ghat! be considered ctablu led If It hs A ,SIUdae &Qe of at leAs,t 20 dnvs in an aeration system( s) . The clucce from Rle Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment_plant has a sludge age of 21 .65 days . 6 . The minimum depth to high ground water level under the site: Refer toattached soils mans and tables. 7 . The minimum depth to bedrock: Refer to attached snits maoc find tables . 8 . Local Health Department comments or documentation that local Health Department has been contacted: Wes Potter of the Weld County Health Department js aware of City' s poeration at the Dave Howard site and has verbally alven approval and jcen Conrlaht of Trl -County has been notified of City ' s oneratlon at the )nhn Fhler site In Adams Cgwity. Cony of this d cument has been sent to Scott Perkins At Weld COunjY Health Department for his review. S. Alternate sludge disposal plans: a, The Rio Dry Creek farIHIty has two tanks designed specifically 4.,2 store cludaes . In case of problems that would inhibit the dlsmncrl by Infection Kt nresent Production rates the facility bps the enormity fn 5tere slildae for aooroxImateiv 50 - 60 day . it is felt that this time frame would allow time for problems to De solved. b . Consigeratlnn would also he elven to contracting to private disposal comnanles if situation dlcSated the need . 10. Results of sludge screening analysis: As ner attached sludoe screen analysis . siudne jwuld he cons d rp.i grade I . SOILS ANALYSIS P , Mlle I /A Accu-Labs Research, Inc. I148s W.181h Moue Wheat Ridge.Cotoeedo 80033 (3031423 270 April 14, 1989 Page 1 of 2 Terry Peterson City of Westminster 13150 N. Huron Westminster, CO 80234 RE: 8886-29765-7 Date Samples Rec'd: 3-28-89 REPORT OF ANALYSIS J ALR Designation 8886-29765-7-1 8886-29765-7-2 8886-29765-7-3 8886-29765-7-4 Sponsor Designation S-26-1 S-35-1 S-35-2 S-35-3 3-27-89 3-27-89 3-27-89 3-27-89 Determination: pg/g % Organic Matter 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 • CEC, meq/1008 38 38 35 36 Ammonia (as N) 3.6 3.6 3.9 2.9 Nitrate (as N) 3.5 3.2 8.1 6.1 pH 8.3 8.1 7.7 8.3 Available Phosphorus 8.3 8.2 5.5 5.9 Total Phosphorus 930 1020 1020 (500 Cadmium, DTPA 0. 2 0.1 0.1 0. 1 Copper, OTPA 2.8 3.1 2.5 2.7 Nickel , °TPA 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 Lead, OTPA 5.0 5.4 3.8 3.7 Zinc, DTPA 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 Conductivity, nmhoscm 0.35 0.36 2.9 0.78 Texture: % Sand 24 23 26 23 % Silt 43 45 38 41 T Clay 33 32 36 36 USDA Classification CL CL CL CL .. ._ - . . 4 Accu-Labs Research, Inc. April 14, 1989 Page 2 of 2 Terry Peterson City of Westminster RE: 8886-29765-7 Date Samples Rec'd: 3-28-89 REPORT OF ANALYSIS ALR Designation 8886-29765-7-5 8886-29765-7-6 8886-29765-7-7 Sponsor Designation S-35-4 S-35-5 5-35-6 3-27-89 3-27-89 3-27-89 Determination: pg/g % Organic Hatter 1.2 1.2 1.2 CEC, meq/100g 39 37 35 Ammonia (as N) 3.1 2.9 2.5 Nitrate (as N) 2.4 6.6 7.6 pH 8.0 7.3 7.3 Available Phosphorus 9.4 14 18 • Total Phosphorus 1020 580 960 Cadmium, DTPA 0.1 0.1 0.1 Copper, DTPA 2.8 2.6 2.6 Nickel , DTPA 0.8 1.2 1.1 Lead, OTPA 4.1 3.6 4.7 Zinc, DTPA 0.5 0.6 0.9 Conductivity, mnhoscm 0.33 0.41 0.46 Texture: % Sand 25 27 24 % Silt 44 42 46 % Clay 31 31 30 USDA Classification CL CL CL These samples are scheduled to be discarded 30 days after the date of this report. �p '� Steven Callio SC/dh D" Soils and RCRA Supervisor WELD COUNTY SOIL AND WATER FEATURES .o x;. tIo "\ t i9y;',, I N. 13 a7 87 ,giffir.eit ct -.44:3- lie , 70 ! ^ 83 i ref i _ + ' / Jy • 44142 t .,, y '1910 i '• f 41 ;.e.ft�xi'lzit' J aS'q / • � 4e •$� *`ryY1 • • Vi�e{t �'2 ov 4S a ti i 'Y ��44 1 12 � ¢ I/'87 j�'w T9. Lti r rk• . •^ 83—. . `ct , n ., 4 ��,' . I wales •,. - 'YI ) 111 1Gya�rr aril ` } WT7, 1 .x' j79 . 67 .fir, • -66 ft'a r1 66 * • •• 4♦r�•' r •' • .� BQ r � i 6Q h. �-� 57j• • 79 14 c^,A�`. _ _ r• 6) + 66 57 .4r, ¢ • . 1, .... 67 •r -'� 44�f1 .. 63 OP O V. aDE S: :a� J.?. f- Of : ' r ,. r ' •Pear if,,, -..'4� . qtr +`�g •. s 41;r r ", �.� , Lid•a A4ita �!� S' . ' r r` 'C 'e 9 7 •Iv 34 66 ' , 'I✓ ,,.• "� :.: k. >� �`c yn • i• k ,d�/ r, }t "t;fyj' tC. `•• i ; 7 •'. 7 r !� "RVisY-•�Z7ii"' w , !!' ? i r ' , r r mac_. R „ • I JJ `•'^T~! 40,71 r d --- 40'00 a L�/7 It' .'N•\ A;SY7., EM . SolL t_ 105'00' £4O Vt.ri 1 ,: t, This map is compiled on 1974 aerial C7©U Let . A photography by the U.S.Department 79 %Alt& 5O70 4000 7000 :a or Agriculture,Soil Conservation Service ro mei swat and cooperating agencies. I . • '134 SOIL SURVEY TADLE 1e.--SOI1. AND MATER FEATURES--Continued r---r---------F tat IfTE. -.._--;---Ti ciff-Lale'r'[ab fc-!._---tredro`ck_-r---- -•— Soil name and Hydra- -'- Potential map symbol logic Frequency Duration lltontha t Depth 1 Kind Months :Depth Nard- frost 8rou rL _ - — - _._._:— �_ nea' action FL._ _.� - �r-fi--r___- . 78,ip 80 C :done .-- --- Q� ___ --- ; gyp] --- Moderate. Wel 81'. 82', 831: Wiley 6 :None --- --- : >6.0 --- --- ; >60 --- Lou. Colby 6 ;None --- : >6.0 --- --- J >60 --- Lou. 4 See map unit description for the composition and behavior or the map unit. I , I I I. M • WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 133 TABLE 14,--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued P Locoing ; High water tabte , deoroex Soil name and ;Hydro- ; i ; Potential map symbol I logic Frequency Duration ;Months : Depth Kind ;Months ;Depth:Hard- frost ;group , , mess action ht to 36': Shingle ; D None --- --- ; >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable pable 37. 38 ; 8 None --- .-- ; >6.0 --- ; --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Nelson pale 341251 41, 42, 43 ; C None --- t/e.w M --- --- imi --- Moderate. Nunn 44, 45, 46, 47, ;48 0 None -•• --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. ' Olney 49 A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Osgood 50, 51 , 52, 53----. D None --- --- >6,0 --- --- >6n --- Low. Otero 54, 55 D None to rare --- --- ; >6.0 --- -.- >60 --- Moderate. Paoli 56. 57 C None --- --- >6.0 ... --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Renohill pable 58. 59 0 None --- .-- >6.0 --- --- 10.20 Rip- Low. Shingle pable 60': Shingle D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-20 Rip- Low. pable Renohill C None ..- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. pable 61 D None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 10-70 Rip- Low. Tassel gable 62. 63 8 None --- --- >6.0 --- --- 20-40 Rip- Low. Terry pahle 64. 65 C None --- -•- >6.0 --- ..... .20-40 Rip- Low. Thedalund pable q�d'f3 C None --- -.- >..O --- --- {�..., --- Low. m 68' A None - --- >6.0 --- --- >60 Low. -- Ustic Torriorthents 69, 70 A None --- --- >6,0 --- --- >60 --- Low. Valent 71': Valent A None --- --- >6.0 --- --- ; >60 --- I.ow. Loup D Rare to Brief Mar-Jun ..5-1.5 Apparent Noy-May; >60 --- moderate. common. ( 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 0 None --- '--- >6.0 --- --- ; >60 --- Low, Vona See footnote at end of table. . WJN.7G.77r WA e4,,// f..t Ck►.i Vr 4"; .' ,/ COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES AUG ' r ,R 3 I This FORM MUST BE St18MITTED 1313 Sherman Street • Room 818 .. WITHIN 60 DAYS OF COMPLETION ' Denver. Colorado 80203 thlte E OF THE wORK DESCRIBED HERE. I rgE EEH ON. TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT Cal INK, PERMIT NUMBER 239O1 WELL OWNER WALTER J. GOLTL NE _ % or the SE Z of Sec, 26 ADDRESS 1291 WCR 11 ERIE 80516 T. .. 1 "1_ R 68 4,. 6 P,M, DATE COMPLETED_.2n3.Q_-_, _—_ . 19 .88.E HOLE DIAMETER 34 to I. C' In ..1;,,,,C.,_ 1 WELL LOG II. Wale, .5 0 ° 74(. From To Tvne and Colo. or Material Loc. - In I. .. y ' o'n -- !- to —•, .r•_ It, 0 50 clay in, from _ to it, 50 15F shale and hard streakes DRILLING METHOD_ rotary i5`' 16: coal CASING RECORD: Plain Casing 161 237 shale and sand ,:.ix Size _E 8& kind steel from D to 40 ft. 237 239 coal mix 239 4i5 shale and coal streakes Size W__ & kind steel from 40 to 65o ft. 415 41$ sand 418 419 hard Size & kind from _ to ft. 419 433 shale 433 434 hard 434 449 shale sand coal streaker, Perforated Casing 449 450 hard Size •4+ & kind steel from 6501•,to,,,790•" ft. 450 558 shale and'coal' streakes 558 565 sand 565 566 hard - Size 1.'.cr & kind from ,loll' f 566 632 coal shale streakes .. 632 715 good sand X Size & kind from to ' ••• •• ft. 715 720 shale 720 740 good sand'•':.'„,• X GROUTING RECORD 740 745 shale , 745 748 hard " Material cement 748 760 sand hard!:: Intervals constant 760 780 sand. X ' 780 790 shale Placement Method pumped interval r .. : . . TEST OAT0. • Date Tested 2-30 , 19 88 Static Water Level Prior to Test. 210t• • • . ft, Type of Test Pump air lift ' 1 1• ' Length of Test 4hrs• i t . 790, . Sustained Yield (Metered) 15 . TOTAL DEPTH ' .. . ._ Use additional pages necessary to complete log,-- '-' '- "': 'Final Pumping Water Leve) ''�-'.780e - - WJR•26.77 W COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES. R + 1 ' THIS FORM MUST BE SUB EC MITTED • 1313 Sherman Street - Room 818 ^ L. WITHIN 00 OATS OF COMPLETION Denver. Colorado 80203 , OF THE WORK OESCRIBCOHEHE• DEC — 8 1S8C ON.TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK - WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT INK. PERMIT NUMBER _XU...133 71_ $AL.ENGINE& <:_ WELL OWNER_N0 Efl T. JOYD50w N zofthe NF. 'h of Sec. 15 ADDRESS_888L_Eastnr 4vr' r.T.Ev00D_.___..-__._ T.,_. ,_N..__, R. 68 , 6 P.m. DATE COMPLETED rwr__-,'1_-• 19 .83 HOLE DIAMETER . WELL LOG 958 ,n lion, ,0 ;o . -29_._ It, From To Tvee and Colo, of Material Loc. -_.1058_. in. hem._..._20._ to...._59.-- 1+. U J7 as...: ....Il �.nr.. - 7 35 56 clay 5$_ in. from_5P - to $10 +t 56 61 shale with hard DRILLING METHOD.._-_ _ROTARY__r_ ______ 61 64 sand CASING RECORD: Plain Casing 64 115 shale 115 116 hard rock Size —.85$. & kind sjseel from 0 to 20 ft. 3.16 173 gray sandy shale 5 173 174 hard rock Size 6 8 85 kind steel from 0 to 401X tl. 174 244+ grey shale and hard rock 2448 255 sand Size _&.. & kind __steel from 40Ik to 670 ft, 255 448 shale with streakes hard rock 4+ steel 752 - 448 450 hard sand stone 41 steel Casing 780 810 •450 457 hard drilling sand. 457 466 silty sand with hard shale • Slze •'4;' & kind steel`" 'tfrom to fi5R ft. 4b6 515 brown shale c - 1 : . 515 • 522 tool .7 z' :; lr 1 't • .r n. size kind + steel 'froth.:: 770' to:780 . ::ft. 52a 567 shale and hard , : •I 616 63 4 brown shad-_ ' Size & kind 'from to - 'ft. 616 664 brown shale little coal ' . 664 719 good. sand X 719 780 light brown shale GROUTING RECORD 780 810 sandy shale , i . Material cement, - _ , .` ' I • y •+ ` y. y.-• - C..__. ..... Intervals ,constant i I Placement Method pumped -' --GRAVEL PACK: ""Size "' Interval - . . TEST DATA •.. Date Tested t . 6 • • 19 83 - • Static Water Level Prior to Test • • • 570,' ft. • • is ., , • _ ' ' )•.• . Type of Test Pump t bailed Length of Test khrs. .• Sustained Yield (Metered) • 1 BCPM TOTAL DEPTH flint - Use additional pages necessary to complete log." ' . Final Pumping Water Level ' 640 a'J0..76.77 i .# i PcLt. .y� it 11 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES NOV 08 tb� THIS FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED 1313 Sherman'Street - Room 818 WITHIN 60 OATS OF COMPLETION Denver, Colorado 80203 ;,TER RE 0CICG OF THE w0RK DESCRIBED HERE =Z -7.:-Cttl(.r) ON-TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK WELL COMPLETION AND PUMP INSTALLATION REPORT y1,INK. PERMIT NUMBER _lath^P-1 - A • WELL OWNER Perncz-1 Pt Crane-) 11 11. V. of the. t'lt- - % of Sec. • ADDRESS 9•RLO-Fa = CIr<_` (fittCM`, rn• T...J _Is,. R. 1oPi L1/47) 1t7ti P.M. rr� DATE COMPLETED I ' [-b.(Ir . 19 E. SOLE DIAMETER Q Le . Nom 0. rn__ •II WELL LOG . 'Watt, From To Type and Color of Matenat Lot. _......_. in. tr Om lo. t1, in. from to ft. 1 BO Qtrd DRILLING METHOD Rcz1 rt L90 c.91 Scow CASING RECORD: Plain Casinv a 1 4o (a� Size E_ & kind Ate_ from _.Q__ to J. L ft. - y0 1 1--'O2, , 1 Size ____ & kind from to _ ft. 41 Q^ 33t(...t e L RcekSize & kind fromt0 ft. S co €1O a► ake alp a10 ct.cx, Perforated Casing • 1.1 `1(D0 O e,: jL 4K�rC� ........_. Size .4._& kind n\-E-i from '1R0 to 10ft. 1lnC t3b c _ , i.,' 1 . ! ' ,.... 'Size • & kind from to ft. _ Size & kind from to ft. i ,:: :�; j GROUTING RECORD Material nprri'nt ( :Interval. j. Placement Method ',red Interval . TEST DATA . Date Tested -' • 198Q _• Static Water Level Prior to Test __S ft. Type of Test Pump At P u ;— - ;•,. ' • Length of Test ''° ' Pk kV"'S• . . Sustained Yield (Metered) 15GPin TOTAL DEPTH f33--0 �1�nt Use additional pages necessary to complete log. • -• Final Pumping Water Level 1-62-142317 VANTINE, ALVIN D. 1921 LINCOLN Sr. LON.MONT 80501 CO vy.TINF_WTST • lq)1 UNtO'N V .LLNCMCNT._3059120.__ ... 06 99 99 5 068 W 01 ON 16 0140s,2300v SE SU"r o-Vio-L2 6.0 c0 0 2.0 0 1-b2-023267 NOA.SY. DANIEL R 2240 veto COW1Y RD 5 ERIE 80516 CO • ' 02..99....99....3....060..013....01..ON....21.....1610S.02169_. .A•J 5v 3 04-13-65 8.0 700 300 0 ' 1-62-O249821 RICKERS.MARJORIE L 2497 1-25 FRONTAGE R ERIE 8O516 CO BICKERS. HENRY J 2497 1-25 FRONTAGE R ERIE 80516 Co ' OS 99 oc n n6R flW O7 nN 77 7501-pOSOf Sf A 0715=4'3-359.0_ .20. 68�_ 25 1-62-024963F kICKER5. HENRY J [697 1 IP0NIAtE R FN1E 80516 CO RICKERS. MARJORIE L 2497 I-25 FRONTAGE R ERIE 80516 Co 05....99....99,...5.•..068„OW...01..ON...22....24005.05000 ... NE SE._6.. 07-15-48 70:0.. 20 . 68 • 1 .62"029710 BELL J B 8990 N FEDERAL DENVER • CO 02 99 99 S 068 Ow 01 ON 22 • `E SC 1 •J2-03-67 10.0 558 380 .0 0 •-A7-(117144 Kap8111_mum. • 47,S ',0AM515 re,n{NVE, r • 0[ 99 99 5 063 IN U1 UN 22 SE E 1 11)-4i-br 4444,Y 375 u'. 1-62-015774' ALTKEN I BOYER 836 E. 17TH AVE DENVER So210 CO 0 .02..00...00....14J768.OW...01•.04....23,•,02255.02900 Sv3v 50413-56 12.0 680 0 ..0 [ +'�62'-01'a2aas""u;nta'SCN 782 9 RT OX 02 99 99 S 068 Ow 01 ON 24 SE NE 6 OS-07-50 575.0 0 0 .0 0 1-A7-16,497 Ann PM fM9t (r PANV tANCI VA1EE SQ5 4 0 P,805 g1 Co • 6; Yv vv 5 ut.o w WI UN c, v4c».1163 SE-SW L-O4vu-rA .! 8C M STD-000) 1-62-092254 RODCRTS• C. J. 1163 BIRDIE RD. B355MFI85 80020 CO NO 511 02 00.,,OR..,.5...,OH 94....91..ON....26....2605N.0170E .. SE NE 1 07-07.31.,.....,5.0„355 85 1,0 1 1=62'=0'1316'00 CA:LICOVT"PERRY" 2000 W 9246 1344 DENvEf. - - CO 02 09 99 5 068 Ow O1 ON 27 1.4 NE 4 11-04-68 25.0 675 200 .0 0 1-62-114405 OR COLADO LANDftll IN(. 4710 V. 1714 5T- GRFEJFY 8(1611 E0 VV6d YJ Yv 4 000 w V. UN [Y VV0VN• olUt 1N CC 1 VP q-9V I..V u D 2GA 1.4.11 B 1-62-015937 JUNGFERMAN VAL6AMAR BOX 15 LArnyETTE CO .,. 06 99 ??....5 068 0w....01 ON 31 NE SW 1 06-21-63 10.0 480 140 .1=6Y-01067SY'-"YIELD-ENTERPRISES INC 1 ""004"176 LAFAYETTE CO 0 ' - 06 99 99 5 068 OW 01 ON 32 SW SE 8 03-15-6b 25.0 875 80 .0 0 I 1-617-06388 5MITN• sJg3$NAli C 2261 MC 0QUwL DErNIR 89229 CO NO . I v vV 5 000 w VI vN )4 I))V>,1Y20W Nr)W ) uo-Iu-I) .J.O 310 140 1.0 1.62-070304 PICRAUX. LYLE J 7927 V 106TH AVE ORCOMFIELD 80020 Co NO SOu 06 99 99 $ 068.00 01„ON„ 32 25605.06009 Nv 5W 1 09-25-73 6.0 515 215 1.0 • 1=62-072111 CROTTY': LEO E. 4320 W. 82 ND. AVE - "' WESTMINSTE 80030 Cu NO 580 — 02 90 99 S 068 Ow 01 ON 32 18005.2300V NE SW 1 02.01-74 15,0 660 200 1.0 1 i J2.0-090574 HOWE. D0L0RP5 BETTY 1340 HOLLY DR. WEST BR--MF IFLD EC 20_0 NO 531_; 446 VV VV 5 ODD VS VI ON )4 u,u5 TE8t5 NE-50- 0 u)-.V-it 0.v )AV lt0'-- 0 1-62-006121 PICRAUX, LYLE J. P.O. BOX 70 LAFAYETTE 800226 CO NO :.n1 I 06 00 99 5 06804. Cl ON 3202005.0150W s1) sw 4 03-27-7815.0 740 90 1.0 W 1-62-023304 7UNL'E••OALTER .._ RT. 1 .... _.. LAFAYETTE. Co 02 99 99 5 068 OW 01 ON 33 SE SE 1 04-22-65 20.0 250 135 0 C - 1-62-027743 PORTER LAWRENCE RT 1 P 0 BOX 8, BRCXMF:FLO sio. Co ; - VC YY YY 5 000 VW UI 4.4 )) 1.•/ NL I V9-14-o0 )V.v ^.]• 1'Y'. .O-0------- 1-62-034971 POLE WALTER AT 1 ll'A1e1TE CO I 02 99 99 S 098 OW 01 ON 33 SE SE._.1...08-1S-68 70.3 390 120 .0 0 - QATF OF uPDATF IS 08-23-88 ,_ PA4;_377'3_; E4 C 1 IGAC-R1. 1:Vi5I0N OF WATER RESOLACLS. GROUND WATER SECTION. MASLLR EXTRACT LIST fULL.MASTER.115T.BY..LOCATION - FILE CONTROL 1 - DrS-P•oM» AK;s6 •,.s.rc CTIFF? OUARTEc- _ 1'•S LP-S• PRIORITY - - - - V M D P 'C'- SEC LOCAT'N OLUNTER WELL WELL WATR NAVAL IRR. t2&- 1 ,..SArOER.AM'OATE..AGJ-DATE 0 D 5...A....0AHGE.._..SNIP....SEC...COOROINATES....SECTIONS.U5E DATE.._.YIELD GRIM LVEL APPROP ACR5 AOULFCR 1-62-0SC.537 KINKEL ALLEN J RT 1 BOX 72A ERIE CO n' 00 n6 c 668 OW 7 7. VE Ml OR-77-69 r,t75 9 123 re.r. 0��-_' 01 n•• v. 1-6$-0386‘< KAILER FRED F RT T BO% 79 ERIE CO o2 99 99 5 5G-o OW 01 ON 33 NI NE i OS-70-60 1,0 63 9 .0 0 ..1.-62-058627 t5.T_,.WXL5ON.v 7442...BEACN..CT.. ...... .. . . VEsrMINSTE SCJ30 CC :^ :,OW 1-62-115153 LOOK. BETTY 305 09 99 S 068 OW Ot ON 33 nu NE 7 O7-12.74 15.0 889 120 10338 GRIM DR NOVSTCM 77042 T% E'T1 'il•l'N1'! 954 n cJ S.E Fir' r 9SLOA_-A___-. till. JR CNAPLIS 99 3071 9 UQLFENSOERGER SEOAL:A 5013 CO 05 7 5 068 of 01 ON 33 02505,02500 5W 3 00-00-10 15.0 700 1 7.-62-0106301 NORTM.NLIICN..VA1ER COMPANY I. .. .. RT..l.pox.El .. .. ERIE CO - 02 99 09 S 068 Ow'•01 ON 34 sC NJ 8 01-02-66 .0.0 1002 205 .0 c 1-62-011865F NORTH NP.CN WATER COMPANY 1 RT 1 BOX 81 ERIE CO n2 9) 00 ♦ ncc Oct 01 ON 14 NE11i R 06-31-57 4Q"Q q9Q_ ,224_„_.0____D_________; - 1-62-012428 CALVERE. RCK1(RI 5 5)50 t )4140 .1reNJf C:••KRCE L3«022 CO 02 91 99 S 068 OW 01 ON 34 SE SE 1 08-11-62 15.0 800 200 .0 0 .J-62-025077.__.K..It R..LIVESTOCK_.. 41 100X..204. BROOM'IELD 80020 Co 0? 99 09 5 068 OW 01 ON 14 5E SE v3-25-65 5.0 40 8 .0 0 1-62-037022' NORYN HURON WATER CO. 3348 ROAD I. ERIE 80-16 CC 99 00 S OAR 0.4 Si ON 14 SF AV P 00-00-On -0 4 Q�_O • 1-62-035017 SLIMS co5St;fl 4TH L MAIN 51 LL0.J0TA- -0 02 99 90 5 068 Ow 01 ON 3- 15505,03500 NW SW 1 08-19-68 4525.9 325 uNK .0 0 .?-02.908011 NELSCi„LAWRENCE .. LOW:M AT CO . 02 99 00"5 _.'IS of.01 ON"-35 SF SE 2 OS-13-61 10:0 54 6 .0 0 . 1-62-017007F WILCOX. NMOLD E RT 1 BOX 107 ERIE 80516 CO ' :7 v9 99 5 068 OW 01 ON 15 950A 1J ' cW_ V� 4_71_ZCL 915 3},7 15.9_ 14.0 : T T,aC arni.LMD ��+rZ BOSC793 -3afG7!ON'---- CO 02 99 99 5 068 Ow 01 ON 3$ SE SE 1 07-1r-71 12.0 30 10 .0 0 ,,..,^009 22.....,CONCELBAN,,,CLAUO 775 u-4D.c0. RD. 11 ERIE.. 80516 LC rn 5oU J+ " 1 F . OS 999 .99.'..5....068.'OV....d1..ON..._35....1252N:0787' NENE 0 100S-72.......9:0 1310 1.0 1 1-6-069637 JACCOuCCI. VICTOR L RT 2 BOX 192 BRIGHTON 80601 CO NO S9V L 02 99 99 S 068 OW 01 ON 36 03005.0600E SE SE 0 11-91-73 7.0 .1)1 295 _1,0yutf. 1-d(-4V[8U6F LL'" VV AIrn LVp W" —_ LV I - OS 99 99 S O68 Ov 02 ON Ot 51' SV 4 02- -55 400.0 0 0 .0 0 r - 1-62-^"v950,3R eakco!NN.AUOJ5T F RT 4.6X 142 LONVONT CO • 05"..99....99.. 5....066 CV 02ON"•01 NV SE 6._.ea-12-37_..600.0 50 24 :0 0 ( .. 1-62-010506' C0045 ADOLPH C- GOLDEN CO oS 91 99 5 068 Ow 02 ON 01 SW NE 2 02-03-66 140.0 36 r8 - r-cz-v.J74)I MAN VLN —CON,'0/.T-T-----00---------- 05 09 09 5 068 OW 02 ON 01 SE N; 6 04-15-66 125.0 39 18 .0 0 1-62-014835,.. 1URNEY HAROLD R1 4 LOICIi3NI CO + - OS' 99 99' S 068 012'02ON-01 SE NE '1. 05-05-63- 14,0 31 7 .0 0 1-62-020441 SNELEY A C RFD ••ONC43N1 CO 05 09 49 S 068 Ow 07 ON 01 NC NE 1 07-25-64 '4.0 18 6- ,0 0 ,___, I-6[-1)[044: SHEI.LT A 4 10 L'. ' II -CO- -- 05 99 99 5 068 Ow 02 ON 01 SE NE 1 07-20-64 14.0 12 N 6 .0 0 1-A)-$VILLA Kid, Ty nNANr R F n 1 I1',V•Mnt'1 45 • 4 \ I SLUDGE SCREENING ANALYSIS CITY OF WESTMINSTER DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONAL SERVICES PLANTS DIVISION REPORT LABORATORY SECTION TITLE $ SC.rp,fanc. 1 515 YEAR 3186 SA.mp4 3! '4 88 o H i Co.85 °1O15. 1 5.842 °10 T'Js. 6(alit • `'4 7O Tt5 {Zest . 044 Diooax M 5 no to TilljA .38 - P 4 - 103 Tcstal K X30(0_ At ....fslig- 99ne) Fl uo/a i s/ _S d SW! C` u 3,396 - ___P_h o28%Q. __.. __ _ • 1-[0},. ii.pl..c an rflt-u 79 . ., rv. rr aiiiicd� I . a . PG t f_ 4 LI TY OF WESTMINSTER , DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONAL SERVICES PLANTS DIVISION REPORT LABORATORY SECTION TITLE Sin - clrreep. .-'c A »nlcam; S YEAt" ( 0 SP . qtr/f: l /0. 0 - 6 'U h(i:j Pao? fl I. &903 S ' lei LI.0.1Li _ II_ _ • I . of o eg`3/n/6G + • • AERIAL PHOTO OF SITE LOCATION AND FIELD ACREAGE 1 ,;�Ns,1"'r T`' ' Y^ try': 747430-4,,b{ +c Aarnen I 9. is.1 I r/41,3 • u ' P , , p c• .. p(�"r :. 5 I •i- { a • - "t" t r5 t 3y. a • I.t 1 .fpr,, ,t `'1 M F '` ' :��. '�., l r� rJf ,tom I io r , r•,..4�r,t?-L. '11- _ 1 r 34 !'rIAJe IC ID, IF. !6 'f t I7 , I . 1 Intoj.T I•j� ' ' r x9 • 7.1 RG' �t �, y;I, t° y.t 24 iv?? I z•i i • Y F•t. �'I' Ir -1 c f. I'' x9 gDfi ''I . - , :1 •% •..:. I•1••,a' •• FiKl.o 5-2(.4. • , P. . . it , ,. ) It 61'r.nus'10'i • ,,, fit• • t.' ;4 IF w a. ,II., r CL. I' . .,��y I r ,4 , I. - F'CLD S-35-2 1 r ' t1 '. ' 89.9 Aa :M:'i • t aw S-35-4-t • - ♦�s 57?SAh ''' 3.____• . ,- :~ )ret.0S-35-S :F.cbo . -a "414 v r.•y r� wily, »>s0 I\ .� 3q 6.,cr. 'v -t .I . i f , t .r i ly )�.� / •I , a ,IItmL .4 -, .....1 )1.14 qtr. .•o • •If;• IIj� ' it..- •� -Yajl ' ' ;r • „-Sts \,�,r!,vl.L • M,r,• �. d't ,�.�' ;�‘7.':: '. 1 �, tfr 1. .n��V/1N1' • i+lYV1'•' 1' r .1�' I_ • `yrr< _ i: ''�_. rte. ,,�J• ..• . �,,} .. , •V.\_. G .rsk"9... Cvr nJn STATE OF COLORADO :OFFICE OF LOCAL AFFAIRS CI,, \ OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT0R •,� I C TEE tC c t3TSQherman Street,Rm,518 +,(�+P�' .�f\ Denver,Colorado 80203 \.�BTs�b/, Phone(303) 866.2771 \V an,. Romer Covernar April 20, 1989 Timothy W.Schultz Executive Director The Honorable C.W. Kirby, Chairman Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Enterprise Zone Amendment Request Dear Commissioner Kirby: I have review the request that the Greeley/Weld County Enterprise Zone's boundaries be amended to include smaller communities in Weld County, as well as a minor adjustment in the City of Greeley, as detailed in the maps and supporting materials submitted by Cathy Schulte, zone administrator, dated March 8, 1989. The State Demographer has certified that the proposed combined enterprise zone area has an average unemployment rate which meets the minimum statutory threshold, and that the population within the proposed zone boundaries is less than 50, 000. While the statistical evidence of economic distress in the proposed new zone areas just meets the minimum requirements, I have given much weight to the strong local support for a cooperative county-wide economic development effort, and to the effective track record of the Greeley/Weld EDAP in implementing the existing enterprise zone program. Accordingly, I hereby approve the requested amendment to the Greeley/Weld County Enterprise Zone boundaries. In order to simplify taxpayer application of the zone benefits, I am making this amendment effective January 1, 1989. Furthermore, in response to an earlier query, I am making the previous amendment which added the City of Evans effective January 1, 1988. 7/ 04 �� Weld County Commissioners April 20, 1989 Page 2 Sincere , Tip c ultz Executive Di ector cc: Senator Wayne Allard Senator James Brandon Senator Tom Norton Representative Richard Bond Represen*tative Faye Fleming Representative William Jerke Representative David Owen Mayor Edgar Gieck, Ault Mayor James Hodge, Sr. , Dacono Mayor Dale Mosness, Eaton Mayor Charles Dolphin, Erie Mayor Paul Hurtado, Firestone Mayor Gale Custer, Fort Lupton Mayor Mary Jane Hall, Frederick Rindy Smith, Board of Trustees, Gilcrest Mayor Robert Madsen, Hudson Mayor James C. Noah, Johnstown Mayor Ron Linnebur, Keenesburg Mayor Eugene Russell, Kersey Mayor Doyle Karst, La Salle Mayor Harvey O. Potts, Mead Mayor Steve! Mullally, Milliken Mayor Earl Reiter, Platteville Mayor Wayne Miller, Windsor Bill Meier, Southwest Weld Economic Development Group Rebecca Safarik, Greeley Tom Pringle, Evans James Kadlacak, EDAP Slatte 9)alley @tchaali P.O. Box 487 - KERSEY. COLORADO 80644 - 303/352-6168 WELD COUNTY DISTRICT RE-7 GLEN M. HANSON. SUPERINTENOENT G .y v, 0 c'1 _7 Pt' -<*) GjJr' 4 '' CC :,3 0 April 26, 1989 [Rs: v c9 -:ice CN Weld County Commissioners Weld County Courthouse Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County Commissioners: The Board of Education initially reviewed the issues involved in the closing of Weld Road 380, just east of Hardin, as per the petition presented to your group signed by many of the residents of that area. At the initial review the Board of Education was concerned about the safety of busses entering and exiting more frequently at the intersection of Highway 34 and Weld Road 69 and therefore directed me to gather information as to construction plans for that intersection. The information gathered indicates that the safety concerns presently encountered at that intersection will be greatly improved with the planned improvements. The Platte Valley Board of Education is taking a neutral position on the petition to close Weld Road 380 just east of Hardin. In Behalf of the Board of Education, qq Glen M. Hanson er // j 67;4 Sdecationi . . . azia, %out On' 3 /7/7 . PILED CLiU. STATE OF COLORADO „t M^^ r^ 0 r :f" Roy Romer, Governor , .476 C't\4A r THE CO3',RD �y TO Gv� „Ra DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION FRED R. BANTA, Director April 21 , 1989 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear County Commissioners: Attached is a list of sand and gravel operations which have had the mining and reclamation permit revoked and financial warranty forfeited to the State of Colorado. These projects will be reclaimed by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division. However, some of these projects may still have a useful life. The Mined Land Reclamation Division would prefer to see such sites repermitted, utilized and reclaimed by a responsible operator. If you have knowledge of anyone willing to assume responsibility for one of the listed sand and gravel sites, please have them contact the Mined Land Reclamation Division, Minerals Section. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, H. Bruce Humphries Minerals Program Supervisor HBH/scg Enclosures) 5355F 215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80203-2273 Tel.(303)866.3567 I J_ utF.ORT DATE 04/13/89 REVOKED PERMITS - MINERALS PROGRAM PAGE APRIL 5, 1909 1'LRMIT NUMBER OPERATION NAME COUNTY TYPE COMMODITY SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE M79167 Nichols Pit HINSDAIE------ 10--------SOG 37.0 - N -_ 3.0 -- W 1-179217 Latuda Gravel Pit LAS ANIMAS 10 SOO 34.0 32.0 S 63.0 W M00177 Cole Pit MESA 10 SOO 35.0 01 .0 N 2.0 W M80232 River Pit No 1 MOFFAT - 10 — SRG 08.0 06.0 N 90.0 W N00242 River Pit Mo 2 MOFFAT 10 sno OB.O 06.0 N 90.0 W MO2074 • Wyatt Pit EL PASO 11 SDG 12.0 14.0 S 63.0 W M02137 ; Dawn Sand And Gravel WELD - - ---12--------SDG - -------- --26.0 02.0 N - 67.0 - W M82196 McCasland Gravel Pit Y11MA 10 SDG 02.0 04.0 N 42.0 W 1103049' Hawkins-valante Pit ARCHULE_TA 10 SOG 13.0 34.0 N 1 .0 W M85004 Garrison Lakes II - JEFFERSON ------12- SOG - 15.0- - - 03.0 S ------ 69.0 --W - I I i I I I I I 1 . III I I • WELD CCU..le-‘, } "'` . -Cie '-?S (Decision No. 1189-514-I) t9€9 /pp 2,2 BEFORE' THE 4 BEIQ pTILITIES COMMISSION CQF THE STATE OF COLORADO 70 THE 30,7,o * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) UNION•PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FOR ) APPLICATION NO. 39050 AUTHORITY TO ABANDON AND REMOVE ) SIDINGS AND SPUR TRACKS AT BOYERO, ) INTERIM ORDER OF SEDGEWICK, HARDIN, WELBY, AND ERIE, ) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ALL IN COLORADO. ) MICHAEL R. HOMYAK April 17, 1989 - STATEMENT AND FINDINGS Application No. 39050 was filed on June 14, 1988, by Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific). By this application Union Pacific seeks Commission authority to abandon and remove Union Pacific — trackage at the following locations: Siding track, 3,000 feet long, at Boyero, Denver subdivision: Siding.track, 4,002 feet long, at Sedgewick, Julesberg subdivision; Siding track, 2,082 feet long, at Itiff, Julesberg Subdivision; Spur track, 1 ,400 feet long, at Merino, Julesberg Subdivision; Siding track, 4,999 feet long, at Snyder, Julesberg subdivision; Siding track, 3,131 feet long, at Goodrich, Juiesberg Subdivision; Siding track, 4,200 feet long, at Hardin, Juiesberg Subdivision; Spur track, 978 feet long, at Welby, Dent Branch; and !E eG 2 %4 Spur track, 600 feet long, at Erie, Boulder Branch. On July 21 , 1988, Staff of the Public Utilities Commission (Staff) intervened to the extent that it will participate in any hearing which results from another intervention in this proceeding. Staff also states in its intervention, that if this application is noncontested, Staff will participate to the extent necessary to complete the Commission file in this matter. The County of Morgan, State of Colorado (Morgan County), entered its appearance on August 25, 1988. On February 3, 1989, Arthur Allen Lohmann entered his intervention. Application No. 39050 was ultimately set for hearing on April 4, 1989, in Fort Morgan, Colorado. However, on April 3, 1989, Morgan County and Arthur Allen Lohmann filed a joint abandonment, relinquishment, and withdraw) of their interventions and objections to Union Pacific's application for abandonment and removal of sidings and spur tracks at Snyder, Colorado. Accordingly, the scheduled hearing of April 4, 1989, was vacated. This matter now being noncontested, it will be referred to modified procedure. ORDER THE EXAMINER ORDERS THAT: Application No. 39050, now being noncontested, is referred to modified procedure. This Order is effective forthwith. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (S E. A L) OF THE STATE OF COLORADO MICHAEL R. HOMYAK AQminlssrative Law Judge MRH:emn:nrg:1038N 2 MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT March 23, 1989 A regular meeting of the Weld County Board of Adjustment was held on Thursday, March 23, 1989, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (#101) , 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order at 3:40 p.m. by the chairman, Paul Allen. Tape 60 — Side 1 ROLL CALL James Adams Present Raymond Mora Present Dennis Gesterling Present Ed Dolan Present Donald Mason Present Bob Sorensen Present Kirk Schweitzer Present Barry Sullivan Present Paul Allen Present ASSOCIATE MEMBERS: Sidney Walker Present - Full board present Dianne Hajec Present - Pull board present David Woronoff Absent - Telephoned A quorum and a full board was present. Also present: Chuck Cunliffe, Direccc:, Department of Planning Services, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary. The minutes of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Board of Adjustment held on July 28, 1988, were approved as distributed. The Chairman asked those in the audience wishing to present testimony to fill out a card with their name and address. According to his calculations, this meeting will last between two and three hours. He called a ten minutes recess to allow the audience to sign up for testimony and to allow members of the Board of Adjustment to make arrangements to allow for the length of the meeting. The meeting was reconvened at 3:55 p.m. Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment Minutes March 23, 1989 Page 2 CASE NUMBER: BOA-946 APPLICANT: Thomas L. Strickland, Esquire REQUEST: Appeal of an Administrative Decision LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 3, part of Section 4, all of Sections 5. 6, 7, and 8, part of Section 17, part of Section 18 all in T4N, R62W; all of Section 1, part of Section 2. all of Sections 3, 10, and 11, part of Section 12, part of Section 13, part of Section 14. all of Section 15 all in T4N, R63W; all of Sections 13, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, part of Section 27, part of Section 34, all of Sections 35 and 36, all in T5N, R63W; part of Section 15, all of Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 all in T5N, R62W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The property is 22,738 acres, more or less, in size. LOCATION: East of Hardin, Colorado The Chairman asked Chuck Cunliffe to introduce the case. APPEARANCE: Andy Loewi, Attorney, Brownstein, Hyatt, Farber & Madden, P.C. , Denver. Colorado, represented the applicant. Their firm has been hired to appeal the decision made by the Department of Planning Services' staff. They have no objections to National Farms, inc. , being located at this site, or even the number of animals they intend to have. What they are asking to be repealed is the decision that' this is -a use by right and that no land-use permits are needed. In an operation of this size, certain restrictions and regulations should govern the operation to prevent dust, odor, pests, and contamination of underground water tables. Several articles were submitted as evidence. These have been labeled and retained by the staff. Tape 60 - Side 2 They are asking that the same rules and stringent controls apply to this facility as are applicable to a dog or cat kennel, a dairy, or a feedlot. The Chairman asked Chuck Cunliffe to read the Department of Planning Services' comments into the record. Stow Witwer, Jr. , Attorney, Karowsy, Witwer, and Oldenburg, represented National Farms, Inc. Tape 61 - Side 1 Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment Minutes March 23, 1989 Page 3 Obtaining a Special Review permit does not guarantee compliance with environmental issues. National Farms will still have to comply with all county and state health department regualtions. He feels the staff's decision is correct; this should be a use by right in this area. The number of animals proposed is not excessive for the amount of land purchased or acquired through long-term lease. The Town of Kersey is supporting National Farms' decision to locate in this area. The Chairman called for testimony from the audience. He asked that each speaker limit their presentation to three minutes or less. Myrtle Thompson spoke in opposition to this request because of odors, an increase in flies, and contamination of the underground water table. Tom Schemp represented Bill Jerke, State Representative, who is in favor of National Farms locating in this area. Brett Beldin stated he is neither for or against this proposal, but he feels National Farms should have the same standards as anyone else. Robert Swank feels they should go through the same process as anyone else. Tape 62 - Side 1 Kay McElroy spoke against development without permits and regulatory controls. Bob Stovell, Preco, and Manager Eagle's Nest Ranch, felt permits shculd be obtained. Art Cutterson is neither for nor against this operation, but is concerned about the quality of life for area residents and possible nitrate contamination of the underground water in the area. Mike Cutterson - National Farms should obtain permits so its operation can be regulated. James Hookum felt this operation should be regulated. Frank Bowles is interested in maintaining clean air and water. This operation should obtain permits. Bill Clover, Colorado Coalition to Save Rural America, stated he is against bigness and this operation should be regulated and reviewed. Mary Maxfield, Secretary, Preco, felt the position taken by Preco is correct and National Farms should obtain a Special Review permit. Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment Minutes March 23, 1989 Page 4 Paul Ansley, adjacent resident, is concerned about contamination of the underground water table. Tom Schemp, Kersey Town Board and chairman of the Economic Development Committee, reported they are in Favor of National Farms locating in this area. It will provide employment for people in the area and perhaps help their town's slumping economy. Carol Miller, Realtor, has mixed emotions about a hog farms this size, but we need them because of the tax and employment bases. Cecil Howard has not heard any arguments that the hog farm will not be beneficial to the Kersey area. Linda Brunz felt National Farms should obtain the necessary permits to ensure underground water in the area remains clean. Jim Brophy - National Farms should obtain the necessary permits. Martin Fohlmeyer - He had to obtain a Special Review permit for his goat dairy and he feels National Farms should also operate under a special review permit. D. C. Jennings was concerned about disposition of the effluent when the weather is cold. Richard Fergert, Professional Animal Nutritionist and water scientist, briefly explained prevention of nitrate problems. He welcomes National Farms here whether they have a special review permit or not. Tim Erickson, Preco Spokesman, feels National Farms should obtain a special review permit and follow permit procedures. Tape 62 - Side 2 Bill Haw, Chief Executive Officer, National Farms, reported they are working closely with Wes Potter and the Weld County Health Department. He also explained disposal of effluent in the winter. Stow Witwer, Jr. , and Andy Loewi summarized their views and interpretations of the zoning ordinance. Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment Minutes March 23, 1989 Page 5 The Chairman asked for a motion in favor of the appellants. MOTION: Kirk Schweitzer moved the decision of the Weld County Planning Department be reversed. As grounds Mr. Schweitzer indicated that the decision of the Weld County Planning Department should be reversed, not because of a lack of confidence in the staff, economic issues, or environmental issues, but strictly on an interpretation of the Ordinance. Literal reading of the Ordinance, the definition of livestock confinement operation, requires a Special Review permit for National Farms, Inc. Motion. seconded by Raymond Mora. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Board of Adjustment. No further discussed was held. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Board of Adjustment for their decision. Kirk Schweitzer - yes; Don Mason - no - Barry Sullivan - no; Dennis Gesterling - yes; Ray Mora - yes; Ed Dolan - yes; Robert Sorensen - yes; Jim Adams - no; Paul Allen - no. Motion was denied with five voting for the motion and four voting against the motion. The Chairman declared that the motion failed because of the failure to obtain six concurring votes in favor of the appellants. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Election of officers for 1989 with terms expiring December 31, or the first meeting of the Board of Adjustment in 1990. MOTION: Dennis Gesterling moved Paul Allen be retained as Chairman. Motion seconded by Bob Sorensen. The Chairman called for additional nominations. There were none. Paul Allen was elected chairman by acclamation. The Chairman called for nominations for vice-chairman. Ed Dolan nominated Bob Sorensen. Motion seconded by Don Mason. The Chairman called for additional nominations. There were none. Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment Minutes • March 23, 1989 Page 5 Bob Sorensen was elected vice-chairman by acclamation. The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bobbie Good Secretary BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION REGARDING MOTION TO GRANT APPEAL Case No. BOA-946 March 23. 1989 APPEAL OF Thomas L. Strickland, Esquire, et al. Address: Brownstein Hyatt Farber & Madden P.C. 410 17th Street Denver, CO 80202-4464 Moved by Kirk Schweitzer that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Board of Adjustment: Be it resolved by the Weld County Board of Adjustment that the appeal of Thomas L. Strickland, Esquire, et al. to appeal an Administrative decision made in the course of the administration and enforcement of the provisions of Sections 10.1 A. , 24.1.1, 31.2.8, 31.2.20, 31.4.2, 31.5.4, and 45.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance be granted. The property on which this appeal has been requested is described as Part of Section 3, part of Section 4, all of Sections 5, 6, 7, and 8, part of Section 17, part of Section 18 all in T4N, R62W; all of Section 1, part of Section 2, all of Sections 3, 10, and 11, part of Section 12, part of Section 13, part of Section 14, all of Section 15 all in T4N, R63W; all of Sections 13, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, part of Section 27, part of Section 34, all of Sections 35 and 36, all in T5N, R63W; part of Section 15, all of Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 all in T5N, R62W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 22,738 acres, more or less and is located east of Hardin, Colorado. The property is located in the Agricultural zone district. As grounds Mr. Schweitzer indicated that the decision of the Weld County Planning Department should be reversed, not because of a lack of confidence in the staff, economic issues, or environmental issues, but strictly on an interpretation of the Ordinance. Literal reading of the Ordinance, the definition of livestock confinement operation, requires a Special Review permit for National Farms, Inc. Motion seconded by Raymond Mora. Vote: For Granting of Appeal . •r Den 1.1 of Ap eal �I., 2 ' /___ /. ' _ 3 t v i /Z'eart2 /Kirk Schweitzer /1 �lonald Mas n I Li �7 u Dennis Gesterling Bar Su ivan EaAA !‘(ylaymond ora James Ada eft . ", , Ed Dolai Pau kt, 6,4Ao.vtov---- Ro t Sorensen The Chairman declared that the motion failed because of the failure to _ obtain six concurring votes in favor of the appellants. , WELD CCU i' Bees CO.••: .'•_.. .�„_, � 43474 Weld County Road 13 SAS APR 27 2: 24 Fort Collins, CO 80524 , , _G.rn�i April 24, 1989 „r ra Weld County C�i{�ni�ione"S'50 915 10 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: We seek your support in our request that the Anheuser-Busch Company remove the lagoons located on the Nutri-Turf site in our neighborhood. The stench from these lagoons under unfavorable atmospheric conditions, which occur at least part of most days, has been unbearable since February. The past three nights we have retired with our bedroom window open only to be awakened by the horrible smell at approximate respective times, 3 a.m. , 2 a.m. , and mid— night. We have privately complained to local Anheuser—Busch personnel and they have admitted that there is a problem and have offered to do something. For in— stance, they did offer to put some chemicals in the rancid lagoons to neutra— lize the smell, but we were willing to live with the smell this season for fear that the addition of chemicals may contaminate the area. Anheuser—Busch, however, has not agreed to remove the lagoons as we requested. It is evi- dent to us that the only acceptable solution is their complete removal. These lagoons obviously were designed to temporarily store excess liquid waste from the brewery. It is now clear that such storage of waste creates an unaccept- able odor pollution. Anheuser-Busch was able to build these lagoons in one summer so they should be able to remove them this coming summer. Anheuser- Busch has argued that the weather conditions of early February were rare, how- ever, Colorado natives recognize that similar conditions occur sometime during most Colorado winters. We cannot risk a repeat of the stench that we have en- dured the past months. As a secondary issue, we would like to point out that these lagoons were con- structed next to our property without any prior notification. If we had been notified we certainly would have objected to their construction within a quar- ter mile of our house. We are not sure why we were not notified of the lagoons since we were notified of a proposed pig farm on a property approximately one mile south of us several years ago. That notification did enable the neigh- borhood to organize and prevent its construction. We are not asking at this time that the Nutri-Turf operation be completely closed down, even though there is a noticeable odor when the pivot sprinkling is done. Our request is that all lagoons be removed, not just those located near our house. If we cannot get support for this request we will take our complaint public and seek legal recourse. It is unfortunate that a multi- billion dollar corporation can so detrimentally affect a private party. Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to your favorable response. Sincerely , WuAAAt C � cee cc Duane Sellmer, Nutri-Turf Fred Weaver, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. August Busch III, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. , St. Louis, Missouri e % u%--' - 4 4 -1/yp WELD CCU rf'; Bees CC ',;:: ;( ';_?3 43474 Weld County Road 13 Fort Collins, CO 80524 I7> LrR 27 M S: 24 April 24, 1989 CLEnC Weld County CagnikESEeri) 915 10 Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Commissioners: We seek your support in our request that the Anheuser-Busch Company remove the lagoons located on the Nutri-Turf site in our neighborhood. The stench from these lagoons under unfavorable atmospheric conditions, which occur at least part of most days, has been unbearable since February. The past three nights we have retired with our bedroom window open only to be awakened by the horrible smell at approximate respective times, 3 a.m. , 2 a.m. , and mid- night. We have privately complained to local Anheuser-Busch personnel and they have admitted that there is a problem and have offered to do something. For in- stance, they did offer to put some chemicals in the rancid lagoons to neutra- lize the smell, but we were willing to live with the smell this season for fear that the addition of chemicals may contaminate the area. Anheuser-Busch, however, has not agreed to remove the lagoons as we requested. It is evi- dent to us that the only acceptable solution is their complete removal. These lagoons obviously were designed to temporarily store excess liquid waste from the brewery. It is now clear that such storage of waste creates an unaccept- able odor pollution. Anheuser-Busch was able to build these lagoons in one summer so they should be able to remove them this coming summer. Anheuser- Busch has argued that the weather conditions of early February were rare, how- ever, Colorado natives recognize that similar conditions occur sometime during most Colorado winters. We cannot risk a repeat of the stench that we have en- dured the past months. As a secondary issue, we would like to point out that these lagoons were con- structed next to our property without any prior notification. If we had been notified we certainly would have objected to their construction within a quar- ter mile of our house. We are not sure why we were not notified of the lagoons since we were notified of a proposed pig farm on a property approximately one mile south of us several years ago. That notification did enable the neigh- borhood to organize and prevent its construction. We are not asking at this time that the Nutri-Turf operation be completely closed down, even though there is a noticeable odor when the pivot sprinkling is done. Our request is that all lagoons be removed, not just those located near our house. If we cannot get support for this request we will take our complaint public and seek legal recourse. It is unfortunate that a multi- billion dollar corporation can so detrimentally affect a private party. • Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to your favorable response. Sincerely, ' u AA 4-eC Q ced cc Duane Sellmer, Nutri—Turf Fred Weaver, Anheuser—Busch, Inc. August Busch III, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. , St. Louis, Missouri ee: # • `-Set 247 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-16L RE: APPLICATION FOR 3.2% BEER LICENSE - THE FURROW CORPORATION, DBA CONVENIENCE PLUS A public hearing was conducted on April 26, 1989, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Certified Shorthand Reporter, Jolene Gaffey The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated March 13, 1989, and duly published March 22, 1989, in the Platteville Herald, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus, for a 3.2% Beer License, for consumption off the premises only. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. George Ottenhoff, Attorney, came forward to represent the applicant. Mr. Ottenhoff presented petitions favoring this request and questioned Conrad Hopp, president of The Furrow Corporation, concerning this application. Mr. Hopp explained the training which the employees have received and submitted a copy of their written policy concerning the sale of alcoholic beverages. No public testimony was offered concerning this request. Mr. Morrison asked Mr. Ottenhoff to comment on a letter of protest which the Board received. Mr. Ottenhoff said the letter did not appear to have any bearing on the hearing, since it did not address any issues to be considered in this hearing. Commissioner Lacy moved to Find that the applicant is of good moral character and that this request meets the need and requirements of the inhabitants of the neighborhood; and to approve the request of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus, for a 3.2% Beer License for consumption off the premises only. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 1st day of May, 1989. APPROVED: y�_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ' ^T WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman . I/ BY: \r, t-74.10, 1J i \ . . . • * .. �. ►•�•..' peputy County C e k •c i John o' , Pro—Tem Gene Brantner TAPE #89-16 EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL George Kenne /� DOCKET #89-16L yG� L00038 Gord n a 890371 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-18 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT FOR AN OPEN-CUT MINING OPERATION, MATERIALS PROCESSING, AND AN ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANT - PHILLIP CAMENZSCH A public hearing was conducted on April 26, 1989, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Cordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Brian Single Certified Shorthand Reporter, Jolene Gaffey The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated April 5, 1989, and duly published April 12, 1989, in the Platteville Herald, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Phillip Camenisch for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an open-cut mining operation, materials processing, and an asphalt and concrete batch plant. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Brian Bingle, Planning Department representative, presented the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial of this request. Larry Brown, of Brown S Associates, came forward to represent the applicant. He distributed marked maps of the area and read a letter from Shirley Camenisch, the applicant's wife. Mr. Brown also gave a slide presentation showing the general area, other gravel pits in the area, and the Barbour Ponds recreation area • which has been developed around old gravel pits. Mr. Brown explained the proposed operation, and stated the Planning staff recommended approval of the request. (Tape Change 1189-17) Public testimony in opposition to this request was presented by John Copper, who submitted a number of exhibits for the record; Dawn Hallenbeck; Marvin Hopper; Edward E. Hodges; Jim Lionberger, attorney representing Jack Edsor; and Marlys Gosnell. At this time the hearing recessed until 1: 15 P.M. Upon reconvening the hearing, Charlene Malecka testified in opposition to the request. The Board requested Wes Potter, of the Weld County Health Department, to speak concerning issues which had been raised by those opposing this request. Jeff Stoll, of the Health Department, made comments concerning emissions. Mr. Morrison explained the State law and the provisions of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance concerning the extraction of sand and gravel. (Tape Change 1189-18) Mr. Bingle explained the mineral maps which are used by the Planning staff to determine whether there is commercially developable sand and gravel in an area. Mr. Brown came forward to make further explanations and answer questions from those who spoke in opposition to the request. He stated that the Conditions and Development Standards contained in the Planning staff's recommendation for approval of this request are acceptable, except that the applicant would like to have the option of hauling south, as well as north, on Weld County Road 7. Commissioner Lacy said the Engineering Department had requested that all hauling be to the north because of already heavy truck traffic to the south, and he felt that the north haul route should be retained. Commissioner 890372 T , `/ . j/-.ver. et- Page 2 RE: USR - CAMENISCR Lacy moved to approve the request of Phillip Camenisch for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit, subject to the Conditions and Development Standards recommended by the Planning staff. After Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, Commissioner Lacy reviewed the criteria to be used in considering a request for a Special Review Permit. On a roll call vote, the motion carried 4-1, with Commissioner Kennedy voting nay. This Certification was approved on the 1st day of May, 1989. APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: av� +'� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County 1.-7297/244. rk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL and Clerk to the Boar - C.W. Kirby, Chairman Deputy County x k e John &U, Pro-Tem ene R. Brantner EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL George Kennedy _ c GordbTAPES #89-16. #89-17, & #89-18 DOCKET #89-18 PL0466 890372 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MAY 1, 1989 TAPE #89-18 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, May 1 , 1989, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman Pro-Tem and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman - Excused Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene R. Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy - Excused Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Weld County Attorney, Thomas 0, David Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of April 26, 1989, as printed. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the Certifications for the hearings conducted on April 26, 1989, as follows: 1) 3.2% Beer License, The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus; and 2) Special Review Permit, Camenisch. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Brantner moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: There were no reports at today's meeting. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $401,404.28 Social Services 128,137.60 Handwritten warrants: General fund 3,979.16 Social Services 100.00 Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion which carried unanimously. e 009 BIDS: PRESENT AND APPROVE 4-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE — AMBULANCE DEPT: Mr. Warden said the low bid for this vehicle, which was submitted by Weld County Garage, Inc. . did not meet specifications. He said the recommendation is to consider this on an emergency basis, and accept the low bid meeting specifications which was submitted by Ghent Chevrolet, of Greeley, in the amount of $17,347.56. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this item on an emergency basis and accept the bid from Ghent Chevrolet. Seconded by Commissioner Brantner, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVE TRAFFIC PAINT - ROAD d BRIDGE DEPT: Mr. Warden said this was to have been considered for approval on May 5, but due to the need to order the paint immediately, it is being brought to the Board for consideration at today's meeting. He said the recommendation from the Road and Bridge Department is to accept the following low bids: Colorado Paint Company for the yellow traffic paint at $36,465.00, the white traffic paint for $31,460.00, and the reflective glass beads in the amount of $5,780.00; and Sherwin Williams Paint Company be awarded the bid for the naptha paint thinner for $292.60. Commissioner Lacy moved to accept the recommendation in total. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brantner, and it carried unanimously. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER TWO PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH PLAN DE SALUD DEL VALLE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Agreements with Plan de Salud del Valle and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Brantner, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER 1989 COMMUNITY FOOD AND NUTRITION PROGRAM APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: The motion to approve said Program Application was made by Commissioner Lacy, seconded by Commissioner Brantner, and carried unanimously. CONSIDER PETITION FOR TAX ABATEMENT FROM JAMES L. HUFF: Dick Keirnes said that he recommended approval of this request for tax abatement due to an error in his office. Tom David, County Attorney, agreed with this recommendation, saying it is considered a double assessment. Commissioner Brantner moved to approve the tax abatement as requested by James L. Huff. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER VETERANS SERVICE MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, I989, AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Report for March from the Veterans Service and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Brantner, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER AGREEMENT FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Brantner moved to approve this Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Lacy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 57 BETWEEN WCR 46 AND 48: Commissioner Brantner moved to approve this Resolution concerning the temporary closure of Weld County Road 57 between Weld County Roads 46 and 48. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lacy, and it carried unanimously. Minutes - May 1, 1989 Page 2 md PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: ZONING VIOLATIONS — ARCHER: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Lee and Judith Archer for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:15 A.M. tit/1"4/1/47- 1 APPROVED: ATTEST: : F��nJ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED and Clerk to the Boar C.W. Kirby, Chairman By: yii it nu» , a ;,cir/ • Deputy County erk c i John o , Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner EXCUSED George Kennedy ^ Gor G/�y 7 Minutes - May 1, 1989 Page 3 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Wednesday, May 3, 1989 Tape #89-18 ROLL CALL: C.W. Kirby, Chairman Jacqueline Johnson. Pro—Tem Gene R. Brantner George Kennedy Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of May 1, 1989 (Commissioners Kirby and Kennedy excused) ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None PRESENTATIONS: 1) Recognition of Services - Donald E. King 2) Recognition of Services - Ivan Rosenberg APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: DEPARTMENT HEADS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS: 1) Paul Stoddard, Coroner COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Present removal and stumping of trees - Road and Bridge Dept. 2) Present 3/4 ton pickup. - Health Dept. 3) Approve janitorial s'm-.lies - Buildings and Grounds Dept. 4) Approve mowing/herbicidal - Extension 5) Approve acoustical panels/bookshelves - Human Resources Dept. BUSINESS: OLD: 1) Consider Collateral and Plowing Permit #89-2 for Delwin Northup and authorize Chairman to sign (cont. from 4/19/89) NEW: 1) Consider renewal request for 3.2% Beer License from Carl F. Sealey, dba Superior Superette 2) Consider '89-90 JTPA Master Contract and authorize Chairman to sign 3) Consider PY '89 Job Service Contract and authorize Chairman to sign 4) Consider Authorization of Legal Action to Collect Costs of Weed Spraying - Lloyd Libsack PLANNING: 1) ZPMH #1543 - Cactus Hill Ranch 2) Consider Resolution re: Building Code Violations - O.F.T. Incorporated; Cabrera; and Lomela r CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: May 3 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 4 - Local Emergency Planning Committee 2:00 PM May 4 - Island Grove Park Advisory Board 3:30 PM May 6 - Road & Bridge Advisory Board Road Tour 8:00 AM May 8 - Work Session 10:30 AM May 8 - Mental Health Board 7:30 PM May 9 - Juvenile Community Review Board 12:00 NOON May 10 - EDAP 7:00 AM May 10 - Work Session 1:30 PM May 11 - Area Agency on Aging 9:00 AM May 11 - Budget Work Session 9:00 AN May 11 - Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee 10:00 AM May 12 - Community Corrections Board 12:00 NOON HEARINGS: May 10 - Show Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. (cont. from 3/22/89) 10:00 AM May 10 - Tavern Liquor License, Henry L. Walker, dba Bears Sports Saloon 10:00 AM May 17 - Special Review Permit, Open-pit mine and materials processing facility, C & M Companies (piste' Farm Resources) 10:00 AM May 24 - Preliminary Hearing, Casa Grande/Enchanted Hills Local Improvement District 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 10:00 AM Jun 5 - Show Cause Hearing, Tatum (Cont. from 11/7/88) 9:00 AN COMMUNICATIONS: 1) State Dept. of Health re: Public Drinking Water System 2) Hopp, Beckmann & Lionberger. P,C, re: Notice of Proposed Annexation to the Town of Frederick 3) State Dept. of Local Affairs re: Notice No. 88-34 4) County Council agenda for May 3, 1989 5) State Dept. of Highways Newsletter #89-16 PLANNING STAFF 1) ZPMH 1/1542 - Shaw APPROVALS: 2) ZPMH 1/1546 - Hoard 3) RE #1168 - McCarty Weld Farms RESOLUTIONS: * 1) Approve Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License for DPB, Inc. . dba Peter Angelo's Restaurant * 2) Approve authorization for County Attorney to proceed with legal action — Building Code Violations PRESENTATION: * 1) Recognition of Services - Donald E. King * 2) Recognition of Services - Ivan Rosenberg * Signed at this meeting Wednesday, May 3. 1989 FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION RE: FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION CONCERNING APPLICATION OF DBP, INC. , DBA PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT, FOR HOTEL/RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE The application of DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo's Restauraunt, 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501-9633, for a Hotel/ Restaurant Liquor License, with extended hours, came on for hearing on the 12th day April, 1989, at 10: 00 a.m. , and the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, having heard the testimony and evidence adduced upon said hearing, and having considered the testimony, evidence and remonstrances filed with said Board, and having carefully weighed the same, now makes the A following findings: 1 . The evidence discloses that the applicant has sustained the burden of proof as to the desires of the inhabitants. 2 . That the applicant is of good character and reputation. 3 . The applicant has proven the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. RESOLUTION WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered the application of DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo' s Restaurant, 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501-9633 , for a Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License for the sale of malt, vinous and spirituous liquors by the drink for consumption on the premises only, and WHEREAS, said applicant has paid to the County of Weld the sum of $450. 00 for the hearing fee, in addition to the other required fees, and WHEREAS, due to the Findings of the Board of County Commissioners in this matter, as stated herein, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application for a Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License for DPP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo's Restaurant. r / J7-19 n D% � <-. - 'fig 890327 Page 2 RE: LIQUOR LICENSE - PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, having examined said application, the qualifications of the applicant, and the testimony of those present at the hearing, does hereby approve the application of DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo' s Restaurant, for a Rotel/Restaurant Liquor License for the sale of malt, vinous and spirituous liquors by the drink for consumption on the premises only, for the reasons stated herein. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of April, A.P. , 1989. /mF« BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: l "�1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Ch irman ,e-4-44) Jc Ci ne C h son, Pro-Tem Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ge e R. Iran ner teozge Kennedv st:County Attorney Gotdon*F7— La c 890327 z O D o . itstt d DOB n stn@itri illl e • 1. .2 0 h • ca© , Liquor Enforcement Division 1375 Sherman Street D) 1 Denver. Colorado 80261 D 8 P INC PETER ANGELOS Ai RESTAURANT S 4322 HWY 66 C LONGMONT CO 80501-9633 ), I li • H Alcoholic Beverage License AC000M RUMOR' I LICENSE EMUS AT NIDNCMT fMIMv fly I , Two ILiNiN MID 1 10-63465 103 206 581.3 3 442689 I APR 25. 1990 True Name w Deempton o<I.:woe F» G HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQUOR l iCrNSE $ 25.00 I I I COt1yTY 85 PFF( �Ni OAP FEF $ 276. 25 {I r : I I• TOTAL REM $ 301.25 r. i, This license is issued subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and especially under the I provisions of Title 12. Articles 46 or 47, CRS 1973. as amended. This license is non- d transferable and shall be conspicuously posted in the place above described. This license is r only valid through the expiration date shown above. Questions concerning this license should be addressed to the Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Divison, 1375 pl lirt Sherman Street.Denver,CO 80261. `� In testimony whereof,I have hereunto set my hand. ems // AP p 2 • -5--,--) J: Division Director ti 7 1989 Executive Director I OR 8402 (3•Be) 2'10327 r !i /C.}S,. ♦ ..� /' • a +c- air �[aa f ,r .♦. 6 QT r--1-5...: \ _ _. *fr LICENSE Fa rs. ----"1"7"" .7"r'` `` -1 antAtlr /{ a r �' :St/ . +r`'ti `:FYlei �_ 1' \ CI. '7 ♦ ac >'iff -3+.s-t9i'o... • C . f ti-.: y GO w ..�' attars- STATE OF •-- .,. + COLORADO d.1Ti.r ? ` - -r i, .:\J. t COUNTY OF WELD I� 4 h BY AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS \ RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSE fl a a L ,, T `C FO� SPECIFY:Retail Liquor tore.LL¢u�orNLfttnseE Drug Store. Hotel and Restaurant,Club.Tavern.Etc. `,1 . = r TO SELL AT RETAIL MALT, VINOUS, AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR ! `s -:e ; SPECIFY RINDS OF LIQUOR - `06 ' Zline fa to �ertifg, That DPB, INC., dba PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT ▪ 4 of the State of Colorado, having applied for a License to sell. Malt, Vinous, and Spirituous P' Liquors, and having paid to the County Treasurer the sum of. Forty-Eight and 75/100w,___ 4; �¢� 48. 75 ) Dollars therefor, the above applicant is hereby licensed to sell Malt, Vinous, and i. w r } spirituous Liquors containing more than 3.2% Alcohol by weight ---t . - r BY THE DRINK FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES > en7-- (Eoseri"Dy the drlak}or coosumPrloo on tLe premises"ar"In ualcd cootafnen NOT Eor eoosumP�o et place vscre Bold") 4, ▪ T' ti as a HOTEL/RESTAURANT at 4322 HWY 66, LONGMONT, CO in the County ? w of Weld, for a period beginning on the 26th day of April , 19 89 , and ending „.. e' . r v 25thr-1 on the day of April lg 90 ,unless this License is revoked sooner as provided by law y - r F This License is issued subject to the Laws of the State of Colorado and especially under the pro- : At. z f t—,c-: visions of Article 47 of Title 12, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended. u " o `� ' -211---:c.,:=:-4, vim, - __IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,The Board of County Commissioners has hereunto subscribed - 0 O a{ N -t-----"-----c---- "-' -' -,- .g a-re < ..- t-a^---.' ^a-cv .r o. -y-'.tr 1 -.-1::r1: 51..‘ ton�edthis 124hr day of Aszx l9 $4 tia r . ATTESTtGnJ s - t 3 of Co rss on w+.2 • �.."' -t+ -..1 V l {- '^t e,! f.sr '�4i—Pr \YvY_ Baird V4-A' _: t e 1.""t5 F _ a-sy - � �ztrtJ Clrl. ,: � � B3 a Bo A n mm m y � pfa w The ar t Co E --1:^•----S::::4;;'-e-..;:- h . ':v r -n:-.--ti4x n--w.v, r}s- ' O-.r - • -. 11 • Cho' Board 0 Commissioners- '� ` ` ♦, . '� %`-r\W�yi ' Z i r O �/ '4/ j . �. A .a i �!�` r r,'. J 4O/ �\ R: H • r . .A,r v. - �r wi. �r Gti.. . � r,r • - . r t. rr w +♦ �. . y o P.. / tik..tz a r a r' • tiw >> /,. ° •' ri > ✓�C„ / ti w , \a % ` �q-.. 4 ri . r l TO BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE. NON-TRANSFERABLE. lI I . . I i I I I I I iii I I TREASURER'S OFFICE,WELD COUNTY N° 4053 I �{ Greeley,Colorado, . X. . . . . , 19.61... RECEIVED OF, , 10,6./C) c✓rLC.. rS1 : /'4, x#445. .Seetccui FOR CREDIT County General Fund 101 0000 q<Z'.1./�1 c .ail, 447) /26 j f SICallit G matt ''JY�.,PJ An�.. t '2,.,.. 174 Tr C-12-7,/ln rte/1 13' /,�.(fi,. n_1 I /47/9/) v ' Social Services 1120000 j I I' He _ ' ', Rs is- • ;5: 100 • . A; ;,-k CY2 ? 5 . O C . I - Cc 5 3 • r. F 410 0803 Fee t=uns 900d912 f j School District Gen Fund School District C R F �} School District Bond Fund 69032!qry I FRANCIS M, LOUSTALET TOTAL AMOUNT county Treasurer Utark S7...9 1.5— N - 1 . . o - f �r . IMMIlla P 304 454 460 �J�J�� f RECEIPT FOR CERFtf. t) MAIL • t.MT: Catr+gletet'l and 2 when additional servkee ere desired. and complete ?teals Put addreaa in the"RETAIN TO"Space SW wens skit FaBFre to do this will percent tN COLORADO DEPT. OF REVENUE • from gbeing to c. LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION a btaddnrionstaerelosisl e 1375 SHERMAN STREET t. to whom date,and addressee a oddness. 2.. CI DawnEon date) (Ew/ a ) DENVER, CO 80261 3. AtNr3.Addressed to: 4. Anti) Number w/Letence: ,!J o COLORADO DEPT. OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION T Wound r.n c.J f°. 1375 SHERMAN STREET ❑COO DENVER, CO 80261 OtignaMa 0 re. ° `oc r"''"`''r``° R F rim". r 1/F fl AM'ey Wart sepultuot re eons,or agent and DATE DECVEREO. " jr . F,t 5• Signets* -' - 8.? rsage.Addrae(ONLY( i v...,t s 's floated ea*pat v) O. E4ri vde 44 ( iUtI - _ t ,- ifgd y 1p n'r - )I. _ _t U,, dAy ., .ip rer j 1D1Al t\Y.I3 . :'4 Fcc5 7. Werra MAIL ROC* - it 4 Comt4IiT3dTT.Se: p1-41 }�7.0. »88-212-866 DOMESTIC RETillal RECWT "' 0.. E y/��7 W LL & C N 6.4 •Ilk VELD wL ':TY CO? • CERTIFICATION OF CIRCULATOR t98$ W j z I i 1';: 0£ STATE OF COLORADO) CLERC ) ss. TO THE BOARD COUNTY OF BOULDER) The undersigned, being first duly sworn upon his/her oath, says: 1. That he/she is a resident of the State of Colorado and aged 18 years or older. 2. That he/she circulated- .one or more petition pages upon behalf of the following applicant and business: DBP, Inc. , a Colorado corporation, dba Peter Angelo's Restaurant 3. That all of the petition pages so circulated are attached to this Certification, and that the circulator signed the bottom of each petition page so circulated. 4. That the circulator received instructions for circulating the petition pages. The instructions included the initial question to an individual whether he/she would consider signing the petition, the specific questions to determine the citizenship, age, and residence or business involvement of such individual, and the requirement that each individual read or have read to him/her a petition. The instructions also stated the circulator must observe each person sign the petition, and that responses and reasons other than signing a petition must be noted by the petition circulator. 5. That the undersigned circulation certifies that all of the procedures provided as instructions for circulating a petition were followed, that the circulator as to each petition signature obtained determined that the signor was a citizen of the United States, aged twenty-one or over, a resident of the City of Longmont for the past thirty-two days, or the manager or owner of a business in the City of Longmont, and that the circulator personally observed each person sign the petition with his/her signature and present address. _O Yp.+v„ � Q diCilC�ra�� Subscribed and sworn to before me on dAR' W.Pc. , 19_. My commission expires: otary is ned .� 890327 raincen.,j / CERTIFICATION OF CIRCULATOR T' STATE OF COLORADO) ) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER) The undersigned, being first duly sworn upon his/her oath, says: • 1. That he/she is a resident of the State of Colorado and aged 18 years or older. ..y • 2. That he/she circulated. .one or more petition pages upon behalf of the following applicant and business: DBP, Inc. , a Colorado corporation, dba Peter Angelo's Restaurant 3. That all of the petition pages so circulated are attached to this Certification, and that the circulator signed the bottom of each petition page so circulated. 4. That the circulator received instructions for circulating the petition pages. The instructions included the initial question to an individual whether he/she would consider signing the petition, the specific questions to determine the citizenship, age, and residence or business involvement of such individual, and the requirement that each individual read or have read to him/her a petition. The instructions also stated the circulator must observe each person sign the petition, and that responses ,and reasons other than signing a petition must be noted by the petition circulator. . 5. That the undersigned circulation certifies that all of the procedures provided as instructions for circulating a petition were followed, that the circulator as to each petition signature obtained determined that the signor was a citizen of the United ' - States, aged twenty-one or over, a resident of the City of Longmont for the past thirty-two days, or the manage-7 or owner of a business in the City of Longmont, and that the circulator - personally observed each person sign the petition with his/her signature and present address. r Dii4.r �� /J,iha., iiRi . I Subscribed and sworn to before me on __its a/, •P9• , 19Ef. i My commission expires: • • M9 Comm'cs!oa Expires September 4, 1990 Notary Pub c 1 . 1 i I 890327 1 I 0 I ?ETITION TOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL {►ND RESTAURANT ttqusE We, the undersigned, being residents and inhabitants of, and/or businessmen within, the neighborhood to be served by a hotel and restaurant license to be located near 1-25 and Highway 66 at a location in Weld County known by mailing address as 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501, and being prospective customers of that establishment, respectfully petition the Board of Weld County Commissioners to graft a hotel and restaurant license to DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo's at said location. As reasons for issuing this license, the undersigned would state that the neighborhood of said location is not being adequately served by existing licenses of this type, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met, and we wish the license to be granted. TO SIGN THIS PETITION YOU MUST SATISFY THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. BE AT LEAST 21 YEARS OF AGE. 2 . BE A RESIDENT OF OR BE INVOLVED IN A BUSINESS, LOCATED WITHIN 2 MI. OF THE ABOVE LOCATION. 3. YOU MUST NOT HAVE SIGNED ANY OTHER PETITION CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. 4. YOU MUST SIGN YOUR NAME ONLY. 5. YOU MUST HAVE READ THIS PETITION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND UNDERSTAND ITS MEANING. NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 2. �// (ii--.ti(�\�./1G%�// ,,- / /f�yb13 0 ii,1,-//r� 1n.17 t�/ 3 - 27- 7''Y 3. ( &A . L f - `Y/../1 _,,,h l t.-. C s. l' D J o L{i' f �a', el 7i s/r 0- ... ,. T(,' / 4. �[{/'^I--pn6/�' 5-'. 1 < �{.<.IP 32 3461.99 5. 4Art-d- i,frc �l at.i4clur-/JJ9 3/3M ? 6. 1e-+ \& \L)CAMLtd m 1.11 ti tx ),IL `111,4, 3/36h9 7. il xh (-(1 a 3 I a a.- 3 �, .f tu_tA,(`. 11 / 8. / �/rr t�� \/1:4-?- ) Ste! /5'733 Mee/ Lr 7 3b d �/890327 • • PETITION yoR ISSUANCE OE MOTEL AND RESTAURANT LICENSE We, the undersigned, being residents and inhabitants ot, and/or businessmen within, the neighborhood to be served by a hotel and restaurant license to be located near I-25 and Highway 66 at a location in Weld County known by mailing address as 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501, and being prospective customers of that establishment, respectfully petition the Board of Weld County Commissioners to grant a hotel and restaurant license to DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo°s at said location. As reasons for issuing this license, the undersigned would state that the neighborhood of said location is not being adequately served by existing licenses of this type, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met, and we wish the license to be granted. TO SIGN THIS PETITION YOU MUST SATISFY THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. BE AT LEAST 21 YEARS OF AGE. 2. BE A RESIDENT OF OR BE INVOLVED IN A BUSINESS, LOCATED WITHIN 2 MI. OF THE ABOVE LOCATION. 3. YOU MUST NOT HAVE SIGNED ANY OTHER PETITION CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. 4. YOU MUST SIGN YOUR NAME ONLY. 5. YOU MUST HAVE READ THIS PETITION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND UNDERSTAND ITS MEANING. NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 1. �y riZta if 7 19733 Pe C 9 3/r 2. • jel,i a .v,z,o 2 Homy / (E: ti-/Cr-S7 • 3 . ,/t) i g 7,i57 F47 61/ /i�f o5 4. 11J4ry..i /5 . �d ��i ice/ /4z/o/ fir.../// 34Ff/" �. 5. 6'U(�/ /fld y� � L/rnyiMeat t?//Y/"/ 6. �47 , �G 7 '.S7- /!n 44) ,.�/,4 7. ,.rC( /.--) G.//lnjt��C� /' ) ]�Ai'„/�r./' /i /s. 890327 I I i I I I I I I • • _ . , / PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT 'LICENSE 4322 HIGHWAY 66 LONGMONT, CO 80501 NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 9. 1-4Th d. C 704.1 pw ritelq 8' A - J-e=1--7 .3//e/PT 10. 1/yriA f(t--'QGk Y9 q,c3 1 a 3 2. .3/i j ic-! 11. o-i� A�., ��u : �j :2J`e/9'/'i�oAlIa-S _3 / K r./ 12. ># a h , 777"if.n,�, C> o - � /��, 13. /�t ILA-)L% ) 17-1 -74, cir,z� 21--re' .' "? 1M � 15. ,- ,,c (t-c- 3 / S/drif 1V I? C z t._A° Cam/, _fir,/j/;o 16. �%. . .4.76.1 i/7{ ,Q-E/:J,,'>1 ire/e (571783-tsc,re 3 y Pii. f�rr/e, AJ./��d/ 17. /72 2. 4 f-ccr A n, 53-3- we�>_ ,39 P��/7'CIIi 1IU Q •—' 7 7/77 1��.,.,.._ 1.1-0-1&.-- ! `I4! gv coc✓Z ✓'J- L,ontp,orj , Coto 3 -IF-`l? 3 -18- 19. �4 - iSe U3 ) )- 1� I 1� LO�,gm�K �- 1 A 20. \ /,y... 'r O7 /3.0,0; hoc p i ,,.n ." �f, - 21. il3zz HwY 64 1 l7 Jn (C) (Cain 22. y-"'\. .,L l •-3(----r,4,__.\� 13,04-4-WC., 612,1,- L h,i c°�, kos-6 / 23. N� V (f efij/�J}Le6r. --/ItBG CO ..YCa_ ,doest 24. ;/J�,01�{,�4 �/./� ,��.11� ta._ l t' inniV (, N. 1 T 25. 14�(;-�` 1i'iP/7 f W -09 I £), e 1 r , /5 , - • 890327 , • PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL MD RESTAURANT'LICENSE 4322 HIGHWAY 66 LONGMONT, CO 80501 NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 9. A ,.. • , ". //7 9 u! ( ? e 3 -- /6'- 5- - I &' , I��'; /17 .5- /9-t9 11. 64;A- ( �l L _ n L/ ~ /1/<< / ( C.�u �/ l \ *�J 12. - (> , � sk /Jcll C a ;-R- -4E-e/. 13 ./ !vw n.viceti,"%l/ /'7"L o lutr7 i ', -2. 0 --, 1 14. c-tiz X_, 1,,....d • (c 7 (,.. 9 Coo_ 2 3 2_ 3 -20 —X I is. „ w l .4l,1) 4 7 P 4-/, G ‘ 3— -Z,z - P? t '� ' ,( 3lu61 1s. JC �v, _ f Z 5C i C � cam,... t. a f._ 33. t4/ / ./ Sep S' Lx,-,4.-z-4 el 3 .4 1a. / die -�-- /3g.55 ss a7r - RcJ. a2e`� 19. 'l,c 0 1, i \A W,. (I 3 ILlitel 9 20. Y� 7 - a1 eit 3i? -(` 66 k /i t i 21. U e • ? y3Z Z ilk 27 6 x% 22. i aim _ 903{ No on hi 3-a s ed 23. Il!. -i411- ,26 '/33 < /iw y 66 3 -c3 -77 1 24. cN?le¢/c,, k i/ `{ `j 6.., 1iocI CvG2 .5 3 -7_3 - f-PcJ 25. ��+...A-,.',AL . No yam( . . 4_. Li 3 .a-3 7 890327 • • • PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT'LICENSE 4322 HIGHWAY 66 LONGMONT, CO 80501 NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 9. !t - /(44 (1)(0 3 z?- to. . ? rilker igt-7+ 1/ ' �J ca Alt,00 V/ 12. Wysd4e 13. -T414»/n L�1 � 1.1,90 retry-Init. .ey .. f."a5-49 14. 11 �' ., ;, /�/- S“.1I �...s. rP_o. zs-. • 15. Fl . 2a f `fJ?7 l2U (C/e 3z- . 16. rig/ 1S76 LCL 3.z t 3 17. .1i _ r. 4 41// 4 -3 18. /7n3& GJ. C. R n 5 - JC- T�9 19. .,,2Aa; r r^ /7{Y /.1r r,0 /-7 20. /36r?14,age �,7, - - �j` 21. J i�..,I £!4A l31� .F- 7 /d�rwr4-G_ ar9< 3 - " '9 Y 22. /V deLl-----\� 7.3i Y /FS ,3- aa KM 23. Q ine...r . 73/ IrrA lei 3 c2e-e? 24. d'/VIAen�tarnrulnx 1- y hi at-Ca? ty "II 25. ritA-�1.,e9 ",1iJIUk-&A /3 C��rTr?F �_ 3 ^ a7 l D 9, • 890327 PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LICENSE 4322 HIGHWAY 66 LONGMONT, CO 80501 NAME AGE ADDRESS //ADDRESS ` tile: DA�7TE 9. (�� :✓,C_;��F-�till _3 /N��2 /��IZI^II�� l✓l 10. Kr.J�-r�,.4,� f D l win 3 aga3�� f-d3a aKU-.. ..v 3i3 \ 11. ta.-Pla.4144-S; y-9Y-3 W�C�(,</� 2,p . y 3�(`312. 49Yiri+.Lf l' ern l U�'e " '�,`". I�G� ,4i r �!' - 1 13. 4.a o , wGQ. .- /375// 7Y�r ,eu. to &I7/ 14. in ail Ali pi:9 a,Q-4 - / 7 -1ne /.)?t /7 / 'i-ty is. O `47. -c1,2„_ /.7; ,- /4 , .--. ri` ! 4 _ i 2 7 16. 70/3i) F, �7: /6-/ ✓ , l c;,c_',-, ., ,a''(l!') `1 - p �y 17. lir/ iefi r joked-- IS/Sa :i✓C1QE3 q C! /.P1G18. el-au,, i I S/S`a Lock r3 L-dn4nsg 1"'��o 9 19. J" i/ cry //6z./err;nk ,c4'/F 5/ /-YI 20. -)/DC. /� _.�..., Ca g ' -X , G S9 21. `� rN //,.0 $ q I1 ..M.p . S X + -q�` 22. J" ' r...r. „�.� / .3 7s"V v en /.7 . .�,..i L / 23. `. ,'f // !r, . ,�I)nr.: '1 i l4 //lei �. /.I�-y�� 'J:?i%�/ 24. -7�.f 709 L t Z i /-id]J�c_ .\'Y' i! Q 25. 1, A M Ctit ) 53i) 04114MOLL, r. y/ylt7 890327 . • • • PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT 'LICENSE 4322 HIGHWAY 66 LONGMONT, CO 80501 NAME AGE ADDRESS DATE 9. @huR &A aI(1 Iu(A ► Jr_e )I Li- 4 -X9 10. 2.--k_ if) a /_?7 � Y,d �f - S -� 11. �..//..A n �p�,y T�f�� f 12. K� r C Mc Dow <-Dci �Ft °Nn w- S�" r l_u D 8'1' 13. , I AYNES '4tZ 045n - Pt 1nN&v -r d/-c- 49x 14. la r us t r..) 5' GG /G ,,yL _� . 15. i' 72 ' 42�S 3/4.-/a /vicfrin 2LID/s+ 16. / �/�+.i".. ._. t_.. t/? D1 i4 (/ ✓ t / mm`/ 17. ki jlil{' g, [.-n‘ 772 Y .czi-7 G ,+�i�`��rrlll 4'-/l o/ 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. • 24. 25. 890327 a ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant - or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. • TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: APRIL 12, 1989 ' DOCKET it 89-13L HOTEL/RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE-DEP, INC. , DBA PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT ' DOCKET 4 89-9 71ST AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DOCKET it NA! 1 ADDRESS / HEARING ATTENDING 65 0�m.Q / /7b / 7ia` & -c �Gc/i �..1-er,U °�j l/e'/ 7 ele4 cZ_ 4 L 1-,/ Ycht .�. Nor 41/7 - ‘ -‘t ,.r-c g £&Ln . .-' 177'7- i t ,)- o& AHD, X M 7' /Z n G 72 av4 . f St - o, , m,.,_ , ,{ � � � r s /¢70 71 AV-c__ T j' r ,�-C o, .«<N 1 d,'si, / h . i�./c 9y ) d A Pi r. .92 a ` � . R.,.-4 V 1 _40/it j , /47 Ifia . // an; di. d'". I;JAI "ei: kerc,n1-27/17-"eas .riAl ..• YS r/ n.t � 73 / 1-/9 9jFa CQt 19mAr . r, Aram is .r�.#%JU '7 2 ( 7 It7%A' ,Je /J ))1 )1 1-7) Y .P./.saJ .7 <`* //,/1I',Gf'.fi'(m, II I /� it '/teak? // Atu ' . i) / / 7 J� q C} L / Aug-c/�2d.•. 0 /47/ 3 zr/c,Y / by [�z.: . Ce ". ��yy ` _ cYO.cwa, / �/R Srw . ,1Q ,/ 3 r.,etr,"-zt. --� ,.�- x 0/) Ain ,;4 43/46's-- r'.7/.al ,./. /,t LL/C'„ k 9- 9 - 7/�/ ,P . ,,.-e,A' I a iiic 2/ed oce ?Li g9-9- 7Q/ de . (frA ,,,,, . „r.,..,„,„, // /6- 7/ "tel., - r 99- / . 7/4„, Lacs,/ G L--\'l<t t a\s 1r CO3_1/4„AL /5' Vs- //l S'Xlt. e .1 t (/ c. ft ' £ ,'..el-ele,. 7/ /u ".p,,7 i/ sr lfr/ , , r /l/�1-+ �i ._.. f�-- //3 3 72 `�y Li- c 7/ '/r.<s:, . 2->. ( l,4a�/ ,,(A &a //03- 2..3='a , /J/ a./ D2O ^ 1140 4 C. AnzAit. , //ire - ��.hd - 890327 7/4` 17.l.. . • • • • ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: APRIL 12, 1989 DOCKET # 89-13L HOTEL/RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE-DEP, INC. , DEA PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT DOCKET # 89-9 71ST AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DOCKET # NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING DOA, L C&rap /1/9' 7 4li Sri- `/ 7/fl.7`,Aecni 5 G -93 _LS W 3 z2- / ! t- O O n. /rrr O a 1/4741cPte •t„�_� ) 3Cils- II 7 E v f3 -10 11-41�{,n. _ 1c� �, ,,-41 ,7, k%- 9 Biplon i / Qr', mnte /r(AD 7��-1ti �p _fr' C/> r . .,.<.a /A t '4 (\1I(1!.\O l77.. OM r``��.1 � 11 74 N. 041), • ��'x.( rIA/�!il•2 �S . ( ' , 1 +V./ 2)(ELyN. Mg 7?M) AVE dig 9 -c3 ' 157717,eMir(Vile 1 k f. 1/1/ !!s/�Q.1'v � �m �o rUrx�,� SA'e,/!, CIA ck_ , /1419 72"r-? 4cC P>9- 9 890327 v, , ,, , ,, i,.. r------- • Ill OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303)356.4000.EXT.4200 WI ' - - P.O.BOX 758 GREELEY.COLORADO 80632 COLORADO March 30, 1989 DBP, Inc. Peter Angelo's Restaurant 4322 Highway #66 Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Findings of the Investigation by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld Concerning Your Application for a Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License for "Peter Angelo's Restaurant." Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 12-47-137(1) , please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, Colorado, has made favorable findings - in its investigation concerning your application for the proposed - hotel/restaurant licensed premises to be known as "Peter Angelo's Restaurant." The on-site visit of March 21, 1989, revealed the following: a. The proposed licensed premises is not connected to a different licensed premises. b. The applicant's diagram of the proposed licensed premises is correct. c. There are no public or parochial schools, or principal campus of any college, university, or seminary within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed licensed premises. The investigation of your character has shown that it is good, in accordance with Sections 12-47-111(I) (a) (IIX) and 12-47-I1I(I) (a)(VIIX), C.R.S. As you already know, the public hearing will be scheduled for April 12, 1989, at 10:00 a.m. The public hearing will be held in the First Floor Meeting Room, Weld County Centennial Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado. Very truly yours, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — WELD CO , e G GS .a County Commissio r GEL:sa 890327 • • NOTICE DOCKET NO. 89-13L PURSUANT TO THE LIQUOR LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DPB,INC. , D/B/A PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT, 4322 HIGHWAY 66 , LONGMONT, COLORADO 80501 , HAS REQUESTED THE LICENSING OFFICIALS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, TO GRANT A HOTEL/RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES ONLY, WITH A LOCATION MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 4322 Highway 66 , Longmont, Weld County, Colorado DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 9, 1989 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HAS DECLARED THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO BE SERVED WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: All of Sections 13 , 14, 15, 16, 21 , 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado THE HEARING ON SAID LICENSE WILL BE HELD IN THE FIRST FLOOR ASSEMBLY ROOM, WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 12, AT 10 :00 A.M. PETITIONS AND REMONSTRANCES MAY BE FILED AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO. DATED AT GREELEY, COLORADO, THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: March 8 , 1989, in the Platteville Herald 890327 al • ICE 46 DOCKET NO. - 89-13L Affidavit of Publication Pursuant top* li:' quor laws*-of'.,.the . :The Hearing on said state of Colorado, Boone will be held STATE OF COLORADO DDB inc.,DI,BIS in the First Floor Cout of Weld ss. Peter Angelo-Ha Assembly Room,' Restaurant,__.4322•- Weld torlotf-_ t A.Wtakler Memel of said County of Weld being duly sworn.say H ay ��-l,Ong+ Centennial Center, watiam�b'w"`°f moot, Colorado ,915: 10th Street, PLATTEVILLE HERALD 80501, has re-- G►'eeleyr Colorado, that,the same is a weekly newspaper of general circulation was . _ printed and published in the town of quested ttle;.lioent- .. ;Op Wednesday, PLATTEVILLE ing officials of Weld . April 12, at 10:00 in said county and state that the notice of advertisement,of which Cou.a�,, Colorado. m - a .:. the annexed is a true copy has published week been in said weekly •'y, noomPaarmorRestaurant to ggr .,Liquor petitions and nn ` nsemat1ve weeks: remonstrances mat that the notice was published m the regular and attire issue of every License for cons' number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication sunlptfonl my:,-the be,filedat.thisC.ierk,.. of said notice and in the newspaper proper and not to a supplement tos. the.. Board-._of.. thereof that the first publicancn ofsatd notice was contained in the - Prboom emiaSte�s,."011ia-' with " beue of said,.vs roper hearted the date of a lor atj n.mere pars- vounty Commis-- 1,a—a r R A- ,.1v f/ and the tut publication *Wady described Office,Weld ihi r to the Issue of said newspaper.beating date. as follow:. ., , .County. Centennial iv day of Center, _915 10th n.?- __, 4322 Hay 66. Street, Greeley, f ) in, that the said Colorado. be j Longmont.: Weld' PLATTEVILLE HERALD County. Colorado has been published continuously and uninterruptedly during the Bated at Greeley. period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first DATE OF APPLICA- Colorado, this 21th issue thereorcontainbig said nonce or advertisement above related - der of February.to: and that said newspaper was at the time of each of the TION• February 9. y' ry publkatkna of said nonce duly qualified for that purpose within the 1989. meaning of an act entitled, An Act Concerning Legal Notices. 1989 M an vertisements an Publications d the oat - - and publishers thereof/ d to Nepw an . •err.. of tam The Board of COW- WI the this Acts .... .� , 19.1 .aq� The Board of Court' Wpant parts , ;- node• by -a ty Commissioners ty Commissioners %i/'" of Wald County, Weld , Colorado —� Punliaher Colorado, has ::Saba d sod .worn to re me thiiXday o f declared that .tile.. .41 „Q a T$neighborhood � to tie BY: Marl• Ann ' !.. served win be Berstein.erstein. Weld, follows r� Clerk. and ` i' Notary Public • Recorder and-Clew Clerk. T S/ D Eli V E R A ENu E All of Sections 13, to the»Board. 14, 1.5, 16.21x,22.•,.» FT. LUPTON, CO 80621 23, 24, 25,"26,x27, BY: Mary-Reiff. 28, 33. 34, 35, and • DSUP My commission expires June 1992 36 in Township 3 Published in the My c r . :.a oY, ,_,:_.^.e;0,iC92 North.. Range 66 Wad of the 6th` Platteville' Herald_ {P, ,;Wald=Counay. , . Marct4 .1 .. , • Colorado 890327 AFFIDATIT OF PUBLICA!ON ,` . State of Colorado County of Boulder I, Dean G. Lehman do Ti E . Omar NO.Sf1JLw solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a punsuA7YTO*ma uouORutYSOFTHE, daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in STATE.OP COLORADO,DP* INC.DNA PETER 'AMEDYS RESTAURANT. 4322 the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and H Ar M. LONGATONT. COLORADO which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and 110°tt1•"HAS mue rte THM Lamm - omuALs OP WELD Canal%COLORADO. Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and to'GRANT.A HOTEL I RESTAURANT U. uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months Es ONLYWt114 A LOCATION next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of 'MORE'.P*TCVLA*RY'DSclnuD-AR•. advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the POLtaY ' *taw HI. kern United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions CamN:Cdouerytde . Wild of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that DATE Of APPLICATION;FHNUMTYA 190 said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for ".PM BOARD OP COUNTY COMMIS publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning ,WNW Of WELD COUNTY•COtORAoo. HAS DECLARED THAT THE of the laws of the State of Colorado;that a copy of each number of -NEJQHSORN000TO BE SERVED WALL BE said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was AS L published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the a s i3mixaims subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed ,,iirtowrein wire Rn9eMwort d.tu DM'PAC'Wild'County mode of business in this office. Cabndo -. Ae nit ti tWat vuD(teat WM.BE That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published 'HEW U4 THB ARST°PLOOR'ASSMMBLY ',ROOM,:,WMIDI,COUNTY CENTENNIAL-, IAL in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; atm&11510214 oust GREELEC COI, 001002 ON)WWNESDAY,ARIL 12,AT _':100114.111,^I,", and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said 'PETITIONS'AHD REMONb7RANCEIMAY newspaper dated March 29 , 19 89 BERLEDATTHFCLERETOTNEBOARDOP ,CODNFYCOMMIEIONERSOFFICE.WMLD 'COUNTYCENYINNIAL CUM 916 10TH STI MET.OREEut:COLORADo• 'DATED AY GREELEY. COLORADO, TNt S-----/7". /J� / y/J 2TTNDAYDPFBM ARY,110, COLORADO v 1 Ganerol Manager BYMARY•ANN.FtUtStsrtme YARD CouNPYannANDacco DMR;. AND.t1FAR Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th THM°BO day of March ,19 89 BYMT�uln,Densy t'PUEtKHElit•Mrdit19g1ea1n PIsRM6s -tlereld. 1\\o\c‘.C, r \ %AN."v,tr•C\ri 1PuMrMoweroiYTrtwtillTemment..: Notary Public FEE�• 42.00 tgil /_ FEE R 2 MY COM IL'S ME�fMfa // 350t HHYr Mr,Awr'n 350 fCM O SiST 'I WWNruONr C } 890327 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL Longmont,Colorado 80501 IN THE MATTER OF • • II _ I J • • RESOLUTION RE: ESTABLISHING THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO BE SERVED, DESIGNATING A - COMMISSIONER TO MAKE ON-SITE INSPECTION AND SETTING THE HEARING DATE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF DPP, INC. , DBA PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT, FOR A HOTEL/RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the - affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, at a public meeting on the 27th day of February, 1989, - heard evidence to assist said Board in establishing the neighborhood to be served, designating the Commissioner to make - the on-site inspection, and setting the hearing date concerning - the application of DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo's Restaurant, 4322 Highway 66 , Longmont, Colorado 80501, for a Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License, and WHEREAS, the Board did determine that the following described - area should comprise the neighborhood to be served concerning said application, to-wit: All of Sections 13 , 14, 15, 16, 21 , 22 , 23, 24 , 25 , 26, 27 , 28, 33 , 34 , 35, and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board further determined that Commissioner Cordon Lacy be designated to make the on-site inspection - concerning said application, and WHEREAS, the Board further determined that the hearing to consider said application shall be scheduled for April 12, 1989, - at the hour of 10:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the above described - area be, and hereby is, declared to be the neighborhood to be served concerning the application of DBP, Inc. , dba Peter Angelo' s Restaurant, for a Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Commissioner Gordon Lacy be, and hereby is, designated to make the on-site inspection concerning said application. � ' 890327 1.1 ,'_ ). ,_ f" v _ C. 890202 • Page 2 RE: SET HEARING - PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the hearing date - concerning said application be, and hereby is, scheduled for April - 12 , 1989 , at the hour of 10 :00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 27th clay of February, A.D. , 1989 . /� ji ATTEST: 7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS iw WELD COUNTY, COLORADO - Weld County Clerk and Recorder /7j4, "."4-1 and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, ChOrman BY: Alf )e. / J, cc;i'�' ine o nson, Pro-Tem Deputy County Clerk - APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Brantner George Kc 2viy County Attorney 890327 890202 1 1F . . • - DATE: February 17 , 1989 WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT j WE HAVE RECEIVED AN APPLICATION FOR A Hotel/Restaurant Liquor License AT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: � i 4322 Hwy. 66, Longmont, CO Pt. of NEI NWI , Lot A RE 123, S26, T3N, R68N Weld County, Colorado WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SITE? CZ/ J IS THIS TYPE OF REQUEST PERMITTED IN THE ABOVE ZONING? Oa v.z�.N.. K -r 'o-".A) A"r`/ e-�NA ,7C1, // r- ea A rr�.Ki.A WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT &vY-.r ,w.li A1 nr71,.. iarr / ... cF c> a-".'r, 40•0,94.c. -Se /aC7t�•r'a./ a 'OO A., DATE�v�.�r.n�j, ,s0.29 PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WHEN COMPLETED TO CLERK TO THE BOARD'S OFFICE. DEf Y• 1 • 890327 DRL 1555 (Rev. 10/83) 3.^ZEER AND LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICWN : STATE OF COLORADO UMENTS C:1EC LIST AND NORKSHEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION . INSTRUCTIONS: This checklist MUST be completed by the applicant and the local licensing authority, and submitted with all necessary documents. ALL documents must be properly signed and correspond with the name of the applicant exactly. Copies (other than application) may be accepted if signatures are legible. ALL documents must be typed or legibly printed in BLACK INK. Upon final State approval , the license will be mailed to the local licensing authority. • TYPE OF APPLICANT (check one): Iii Individual . 1=1 Partnership I� Corporation • NAME OF APPLICANT: 324.412Z7 '? g<,/, 428/4' //!/- TRADE NAME: /) v r6e /i At er!—e CS /Q.. t-7` _ . d PLEASE CHECK ALL APPROPRIATE BOXES Applicant Local State Documents . I. APPLICATION OR ADDENDUM IZZI M I=i* A. Orisinal (green or yellow), not a copy 1—I • I—'1 Iii* 8. Complete all appropriate sections • ( tl Iii* C. Sign application - . I=I ! I 1`1* D. Attach appropriate fee II. PROOF OF PROPERTY POSSESSION : 1=1 f=) I—I* A. Deed (or) { I i—}6-1 I=1* 8. Lease (or) CI CI 1'I 1. Lease must cover entire license period (minimum one year) 1-1 1"`1 1—I* C. Lease Assignment I—'1 CI I—'I 1. Acceptance of applicant I`i 1"I I—I • 2. Consent by landlord • I=1 I_i !=1 D. All possession documents must be signed 1 1 t-- .-1 I_I* E. Floor diagram of premises to be licensed (maximum size 8 1/2" x 14") III. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS I'I II* A. Purchase agreement or stock transfer agreement ICI I' I`I B. Affidavit on source.of all funds invested ry.ry •i (Continued on Reverse Side) S903 •A olicant Local Stat Oocumet • Notas or loans (i.e. , assumed, banks, previous 1-1 11 1---' C. owner, etc.) 1---1r---; 1-1 1. Applicant may not have any unlawful financial interest in any other licensed establishment IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION • .I I si 1_1* A, Individual History Record(s) (form DRL 404-I) IZ1 CI B. Fingerprints taken and submitted • V. MANAGEMENT (if other than applicant) 1- 1g1 1-1* A. Manager Registration Form (form ORL 367) 11 . t7 DO fae _acuired on1�� if Motel ana 1'—i ` Restaurant `:i tense . 1-1 1----1 r---1 B. Written management agreement (or) 1-1 I4.2 1-1 C. Affidavit describing duties, limitations and compensation VI. CORPORATE DOCUMENTS (if applicable) 1 1-1* A. Certificate of Incorporation (or) 1—'1 1---1* B. Certificate of Good Standing if corporation is Cl _ — more than two years old (or) CI 1-1 I-1* C. Certificate of Authorization if foreign - corporation licl iC I-1 D. Articles of Incorporation IS1 1sr 1-1 E. Minutes of meeting electing current officers 1i,1 1-1 1---1 F. Stock certificates (100% of issued stock) 1-1 1,1 1--1 G. List parentfcorporations(ifkholders and applicable) directors of VII. PARTNERSHIP DOCUMENTS (if applicable) 1-1 1_1 CI* A. Partnership agreement (general or limited) _ 1^1 1-1 1. Not needed if husband and wife 11 -- licable) 1---1 1-1 r---1 B. Dissolutionment of partnership (if app VIII. ADDITIONAL LOCAL REQUIREMENTS r 3 A. L-� 171 ,�t/'a�.e. ,mod ,, J 1—'1 1-1 8. 890327 .-- DRL a0a(Rev,5/el) • •NOT WRITE IN THIS BLOCK STATE OF COLORADO Il+ SimIf rea 0, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE • t' `- DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT rN „ 0 1375 SHERMAN STREET - DENVER,COLORADO 80261 USE LICENSE ACCOUNT NO. LICENSE ISSUED THROUGH FOR ALL REFERENCE ( (EXPIRATION DATE) - • COLORADO LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION I LIABILITY INF9RMATION I • COUNTY CITY INDUSTRY TYPE LIABILITY DAT! KEY CODE I STATE FEE I CITY I COUNTY PAID 41.9 I 37-1 I 49.1 ,,, J• (03) TOTAL FEE i Instructions on Page 4 of Application. ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN 1.Name of Applicant(s): If partnership,list partners names(at least two);if corporation,name of corporation: Date fired with Local Authority: DBP, Inc. 2 _ I _s0/ State Sales Tax N4' 2,Trade Name of Establishment; (OBA) Business Telephone: "— Peter Angelo's Restaurant ti'tf -`1•/7Y 3.Address of Premises:(Exact location of premises must be given,Give street and number,when possible.If place to be licensed is located in a town or rural district where it is impossible to give street and number,the lot and block number or part of section where located must be given.) 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, CO 80501 City: County: State: Zip Code: unincorporated I Weld CO 80501 4.Mailing Address: (Number and Street) City or Town; State: Zip Code: see #3 5. If these premises are now licensed,answer the following: .R/a • Trade Name of Establishment(DBA): State License No.: Type of License: Expiration Date: • KEY STATE LOCAL I KEY STATE CODE COLUMN A PEES FEES CODE COLUMN a FEES 20 O RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE-City $177.50 $22.50 31 0 WHOLESALE LIQUOR LICENSE 1,000.00 20 ❑RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE-County 262.50 37.50 32 0 WHOLESALE BEER LICENSE 500.00 21 ❑LIQUOR LICENSED DRUGSTORE-City 177.60 22.50 38 0 IMPORTER'S LICENSE(Vinous&Spirituous Liquor)250.00 21 [Q LIQUOR LICENSED DRUGSTORE-County 262.50 37.50 qq ❑NONRESIDENT MANUFACTURER or 250.00 22 O BEER&WINE LICENSE-City 152.50 22.50 IMPORTER(Malt Liquor) 22 ❑BEER&WINE LICENSE-County 237.50 37.50 27 ❑BREWERY LICENSE 250,00 25 Q CLUB LICENSE ❑City ❑County 110.00 16.00 28 ❑WINERY LICENSE 250,00 23 ®HOTEL&RESTAURANT LICENSEQCity®County 301.25 48.75 43 0 LIMITED WINERY LICENSE 25.00 40 TAVERN LICENSE OCity ❑County 30125 48.75 26 ❑PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION LICENSE with 25.00 42 ❑RACE TRACK LICENSE ❑City ❑County 301.25 48.75 41 CARTS LICENSE Deity ©County 110.00 15.00 ❑OTHER(Specify) (Change of corporate structure,location,trade name,renewal,etc.) 88032'! Page 1 of 4- (continued) • ss YES NO 6. Is the applicant;or any of the partners:or officers.stockholders or directors of said applicant(if a corporation); or manager;under the age of twenty-one years? 7, (e)Has the applicant:or any of the partners:or officers,stockholders or directors of said applicant(if a corporation) ever been convicted o1 a crime?If answer is"yes,"explain in detail. C (b)Has persons lending assistance or financial support to the applicant;or the manager;or employees;ever been ❑ convicted of a crime?If answer is"yes,"explain in detail. fIC 8. Has the applicant:or any of the partners;or officer:,directors or stockholders of said applicant(if a corporation); or manager;ever: (a)been denied en alcoholic beverage license? 0 EZ (b)had en alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0 2 (C)had Interest In an entity that had en alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? if answer Is"yes."explain In detail(Attach separate sheet If necessary.) 9. Hes a liquor license for the premises TO be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? C 10. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school,or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary?If answer is"yes,"explain in detail. ❑ Q 11, Does or did the applicant;or any of the partners;or officers,directors or stockholders of said applicant(if a corporation),have a direct or indirect interest in any other Colorado Liquor license(include loans to or from any licensee,or interest in a loan to any licensee)? C E If answer is "yes,"explain in detail. 12, State whether the applicant has legal possession of the premises by virtue of ownership or under■lease.If leased,list name and address of landlord and term of lease: Lease. Landlord is Uniwest Equipment Co. , 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, CO 80501 13. Identify the persons,firms or corporations who now or will have,a financial interest,evidenced either by loans or equity ownership in the business for — which this license is requested.State the names and addresses,and the amount and source of such financial interest expressed in dollars or other items of value,such as inventory,furniture or eduipment:(i.e.,bank,relatives,friends,previous owners,etc.).Use separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS I INTEREST nno _ T,,- 4322 Highway 66 , Longmont I corporate owner David B. Pietrangelo 13801 Elmore Rd. , Longmont' shareholder $3000.00 I 14. LIR the names and addressal of all dquor businesses in which any of the OersOns in the previous question are materially interested. (Use separate sheet if necessary.) NAME BUSINESS ADDRESS n/a • • Attach copies of all notes end security instruments,end any written agreement or details of any oral agreement,by which any person(Including a corporation) will sham in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment,end any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or con- ditional in any way by volume,profit,sties,giving of advice or consultation. Paige 2 o14 (� a� ((ccomihued) • . I J — 15. Luluor Licensed Drug Store applicants,ans he following: YE$ NO (a) Ooes the applicant for a Liquor Licens g Store have a Drug Store License issued by the Col lo Board of Pharmacy? I1 answer is"no,"explain in detail. f""' (b)Is the applicant,or does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store employ a Pharmacist registered in the State of Colorado? M If"yes,"give License Number: n/a 16. Club Liquor License applicants,answer the following: (a) Complete items 20(a) through id)and (1). n/a (b) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national,social,fraternal,patriotic,political or athletic purpose and not for Q !Si pecuniary gain? (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises to be licensed as a club? (Three years required,) 17. Colorado Manufacturer or Wholesaler applicants,answer the following: n/a la)Does the applicant own,lease or operate any Colorado warehouse or storage plant in connection with this business? If answer is"yes,"give full address;if"no,"explain in detail. (b)Does the applicant have an active surety bond for the payment of liquor excise taxes? If answer is"yes,"give amount and name and address of insuror;if"no,"explain in detail. t✓ ❑ (c) If the applicant is a wholesaler,does or did any owner,part owner,shareholder,director or officer nave any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler,retailer,manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado u 77 to sell malt,vinous or spirituous liquor?If answer is"yes,"attach explanation in detail, (d)Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit?If"yes,"attach a copy of the permit:if"no,"explain in detail. 18. Nonresident Manufacturer(malt liquor) or importer(malt,vinous or spirituous liquor)applicants,answer the following; (a)To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? n/a (b) If the applicant is an importer or manufacturer,does or did any owner,part Owner,shareholder,director or officer have E ELI any direct or indirect financial interest in an importer,manufacturer,wholesaler or retailer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt,vinous or spirituous liquor?If answer is"yes,"attach explanation in detail. (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit?If"yes,"attach a copy of the permit:if"no,"explain in detail. I_-t (d)If the applicant is an importer or manufacturer,are you the primary source of supply in the U.S.? ❑ ,� If•'no,"explain in detail. 19. If the applicant is an individual or partnership,answer the following: (Attach separate sheet if necessary,) (a) Name of individual or name and class Home Address,City and State: Date of Birth: `Of each Partner: n/a (b)Name of Operating Manager: Home Address,City and State: Date of Birth: /lliir? /3c'i2a1!/i /in igkr? / Lynvi:e Zoi0-ynd.t7 Ze-/7 - ≥'� (c) When did said partnership commence doing business?(Attach a copy of the partnership agreement,except ai between husband and wife, and trade name affidavit.) 20,lithe appilcant is a corporation,answer the following: Date. (a)Corporation is organized under the laws of the State of: Col dill (b) Principal business is conducted at County of: State of: 4322 Highway 66. 7.onrmont. R05n1 weld I COloraAn (c) Date of filing last annual corporate report to the secretary of state: none d Name of each officer listed below: I Home Address,City and State: II Date of Birth: res Pident:.David B. Pietrangelo 13801 Elmore Rd. , Longmont, CO 80501 4-17-39 Vice•Presidenr Treasurer; u flatri4 R. Pir+hran aln tt Secretary: Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo::. �_- —Al Operating Manager: (e) Nlist ame of stockholders;stockholder: actual owner or pledge.(Use separate sheet if necessary) — Home Address,City end State: ! %of stock: Date of firth: DaviA P Pic+-rangpin 1i8Q1 Flmnre t).7 Tongrn•...4- ni_I 100 4-17-39 (f) Name of all Directors or Trustees -+ of Corporation: Home Address,City and State: Date of Birth: David B. Pietrangelo 13801 Elmore Rd. . Longmont. CO 4-17-39 -- Page 3w4 of a 890/327 4 INSTRUCTIONS S 1 1)Check the appropriate box for the type of license(s) being applied for on page 1. If you are applying for a retail license described in Column A, contact the Local Licensing Authority to obtain all local procedures and requirements. 2) You may attach separate sheets or additional documents if necessary to fully complete this application. Copies may be accepted (other than application) if signatures are evident. All documents must be type- written or legibly printed in BLACK ink. 3) IMPORTANT: For those retail licenses described in Column A on page 1, this application and all support- ing documents must FIRST BE FILED IN DUPLICATE WITH AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. Application will not be accepted unless all applicable questions are fully answered, all sup- porting documents correspond exactly with the name of the applicant(s) and proper fees are attached. 4) Form DRL 404-I, "Individual History Record" must be completed and filed in duplicate by the following: a. Each applicant b. All general partners c. Over 5% limited partners d. All officers and directors of a corporation e. All stockholders of a corporation not subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. f. Over 5%stockholders of a corporation subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. g. Operating managers h. Each person required to file form DRL 404.1 must submit fingerprints to Local Licensing Authority. 5) NOTE:License status will not be given over the telephone. License will be mailed to the Local Licensing Authority upon issuance. OATH OF APPLICANT This application is to be signed by individual,each general partner of partnership and by corporate applicants. I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that I know the contents thereof, and that all matters and information set forth therein are true,correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and information; and I agree to conform to all applicable statutes and all rules and regulations promulgated by the Colorado Department of Revenue in connection therewith, INDIVIDUALS AND ALL GENERAL PARTNERS OF CORPORATIONS SIGN HERE: PARTNERSHIPS MUST SIGN HERE: OA, Inc. /elate By dui / �N (Pre ident,Y' oaat,AsSac DATF• DATE: '2-- 9 f f REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (MANUFACTURERS, IMPORTERS,WHOLESALERS DISREGARD THIS SECTION) The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satis- factory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirement of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and complies with the provisions of Title 12, Article 47, CRS 1973 as amended, THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION IS HEREBY APPROVED. DATED AT this clay of ,A.D.19 AT (Name of Town,City an0 County) . EY: (Mayor,Chairman of Scam of county commissioners or other title of the licensing'authority) ATTEST: (Clerk,secretary of other officer having the official seal of the licensing authority) (If the premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk,if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If,by ordinance or otherwise,the local licensing authority is some other official,then such approval should be given by such official.) Local Licensing Authority report the following pertaining to each person required to file form DRL 4O4-I: FINGERPRINTED&SUBMITTED BACKGROUND N.C.I.C.&C.C.I.C.CHECKS Yes❑ No O Yes ❑ No ❑ Pearl of +^0034! _ _ • INSTRUCTIONS • 1) Check the appropriate box for the type of license(s) being applied for on page 1. If you are applying for a retail license described in Column A, contact the Local Licensing Authority to obtain all local procedures and requirements, 2) You may attach separate sheets or additional documents if necessary to fully complete this application. Copies may be accepted (other than application) if signatures are evident. All documents must be type- written or legibly printed in BLACK ink. 3) IMPORTANT: For those retail licenses described in Column A on page 1, this application and all support- ing documents must FIRST BE FILED IN DUPLICATE WITH AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. Application will not be accepted unless all applicable questions are fully answered, all sup- porting documents correspond exactly with the name of the applicant(s) and proper tees are attached. 4) Form DRL 404-I, "Individual History Record" must be completed and filed in duplicate by the following: a. Each applicant b, An general partners c. Over 5% limited partners d. All officers and directors of a corporation e. All stockholders of a corporation not subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. f. Over 5% stockholders of a corporation subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, g. Operating managers h, Each person required to file form DRL 404-I must submit fingerprints to Local Licensing Authority. 5) NOTE:License status will not be given over the telephone. License will be mailed to the Local Licensing Authority upon issuance. OATH OF APPLICANT This application is to be signed by individual,each general partner of partnership and by corporate applicants. I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that I know the contents thereof, and that all matters and information set forth therein are true,correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and information; and I agree to conform to all applicable statutes and all rules and regulations promulgated by the Colorado Department of Revenue in connection therewith, INDIVIDUALS AND ALL GENERAL PARTNERS OF CORPORATIONS SIGN HERE: PARTNERSHIPS MUST SIGN HERE: 0B3, Inc.Ety (Pre ident,.Y�'aa�•"';aa t,,os+rac DATE• DATF• '2-- 7 6' S REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (MANUFACTURERS,IMPORTERS,WHOLESALERS DISREGARD THIS SECTION) The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satis- factory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and complies with the provisions of Title 12, Article 47, CRS 1973 as amended. THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION IS HEREBY APPROVED, DATED AT Greeley this 12th day of April ,A.D. 79 89 f' — ;i_ t lL/'• AT Weis! County 2 /1/0 ! (Name 52 Tow ,City and County) — gy. 1Mayyyaaa harm o1y_6 of coup opmmmiftloneryS or oth�5inie of the li�bnnyt/�y� onty ATTEST: '�'�^"� .,y H �� (Clerk,sec 'lary of other officer having the onicia cal of he Ikens- g authority) / _ tJ (If the premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk,if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If,by ordinance or otherwise,the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official.) Local licensing Authority report the following pertaining to each person required to file form DRL 404.1: FINGERP INTED & SUBMITTED BACKGROUND N.C.LC.& C.C.I.C,Cf/� .�j Yes No ❑ Yes ,� No ❑ e 32 4 Pegs 4 of 4 - BUSINESS LEASE This lease is made this 09_ day of FESUARY__ 1989, between Un&West Equipment (the "Lessor" ) and DEP INC. DEA PETER ANGLOS__ (the "Lessee" ) . In consideration of the payment of the rent and the performance of covenants and agreements by the Lessee set forth below, the Lessor does hereby lease to the Lessee the following described premises situate in the County of Weld, in the State of Colorado; the address of which is 4322 Hwy. 66, Longmont, CO. The property address is 4322 Hwy 66, and the legal description is:_PT_NE4_NW4_LOT_A_RE_123_SEC_26_T3N_R68_NORTH_____ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all the appurtenances unto the said Lessee from twelve o' clock noon on the O1_ day of MAR , 1989 , at and for a rental . for the full term of $ 18000. 00_ payable in monthly installments of $ 1, 500. 00, said amount being due on the FIRST of each month. With 10% increase every year. The Lessee, in consideration of the leasing of the premises agrees as follows : 1. To pay the rent for the premises above- described. 2. To keep the improvements upon the premises, including sewer connection, plumbing, wiring and glass in good repair, all at Lessee's expense, and at the expiration of this lease to surrender the premises in as good a condition as when the Lessee entered the premises, loss by fire, inevitable accident, and ordinary wear excepted. To keep all entrances and/or sidewalks on and around the premises free and clear of ice and snow, and to keep the entire exterior premises free from litter, dirt, debris and obstructions; to keep the premises in a clean and sanitary condition as required by the ordinances of the state and county in which the property is situate. 3. To sublet no part of the premises, and not to assign the lease or any interest therein without the written consent of the Lessor. 4. To use the premises only as RESTAURANT and to use the premises for no purpose prohibited by the laws of the United States or the State of Colorado, or of the ordinances of Weld County in which said premises are located, and for no improper or questionable purposes whatsoever, and to neither permit nor suffer any disorderly conduct, noise or nuisance having a tendency to annoy or disturb any persons occupying adjacent premises. 890327 5. To Am either hold nor attema to hold the Lessor liabl for any injury or Sago, either proximate or remote, occuring through or caused by the repairs, alterations, injury or accident to the premises, or adjacent premises, or other parts of the above premises not herein demised, or by reason of the negligence or default of the owners of occupants thereof any other person, nor to hold the Lessor liable for any injury or damage occasioned by defective electric wiring, or the breakage or stoppage of plumbing or sewerage upon said premises or upon adjacent premises, whether breakage of stopping results from freezing or otherwise; to neither permit nor suffer said premises, or the walls or floors thereof, to be endangered by overloading, nor said premises to be used for any purpose which would render the insurance thereon void or the insurance risk more hazardous, nor make any alterations in or changes in, upon, or about said premises without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor thereof, but to permit the Lessor to place a "For Rent" card or sign upon the leased premises at any time after sixty days before the end of this lease. 6. To allow the Lessor to enter upon the premises at any reasonable hour. 7. To pay all charges for water and water rents ; heating; and lighting of the building in which said premises are located. 8. To hold harmless Lessor from any damage to contents of premises and if insurance is desired, to seek out separate renters insurance for contents of premises. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN LESSOR AND LESSEE AS FOLLOWS; 9. No assent, express or implied, to any breach of any one or more of the agreements hereof shall be deemed or taken to be a waiver of any succeeding or other breach. 10. If, after the expiration of this lease, the Lessee shall remain in possession of the premises and continue to pay rent without a written agreement as to such possession, then such tenancy shall be regarded as a month-to-month tenancy, at a monthly rental, payable in advance equivalent to the last months rent paid under this lease and subject to all the terms and conditions of this lease. 11 . If the premises are left vacant and any part of the rent reserved hereunder is not paid, then the Lessor may, without being obligated to do so, and without terminating this lease, retake possession of the said premises and rent the same for such rent, and upon such conditions as the Lessor may think best, making such change and repairs as may be required, giving credit for the amount of rent so received less all expenses of such changes and repairs, and the Le=ssees shall he liable for the balance of the rent h 'rr;'in reserve., until the expiration of the term of this le,,.. .. . 890327 12. Thilkossor acknowledges receillof a deposit in the amour of $ 462nD fW_ to be heir y the Lessor for the faithful performance of all the terms, conditions and covenants of this lease. The Lessor may apply the deposit to cure any default under the terms of this lease and shall account to the Lessee for the balance. The Lessee may not apply the deposit hereunder to the payment of the rent reserved hereunder or the performance of other obligations. 13. If any part of the rent provided to be paid herein is not paid when due, or if any default is made in any of the agreements by the Lessee contained herein, it shall be lawful for the Lessor to declare the term ended, and to enter into the premises, either with or without legal process, and to remove the Lessee or any other person occupying the premises, using such force as may be necessary, without being liable to prosecution, or in damages therefor, and to repossess the premises free and clear of any rights of the Lessee, 14. In the event of any dispute arising under the terms of this lease, or in the event of non-payment of any sums arising under this lease and in the event the matter is turned over to an attorney, the party prevailing in such dispute shall be entitled, in addition to other damages or costs, to receive reasonable attorney' s fees from the other party. 15. In the event any payment required hereunder is not made within ten ( 10) days after the payment is due, a late charge in the amount of five percent (56) of the payment will be paid by the Lessee. 16. In the event of a condemnation or other taking by any governmental agency, all proceeds shall be paid to the Lessor hereunder, the Lessee waiving all right to any such payments. 17. Lessee shall have the right to apply for a hotel and restaurant liquor licence under the colorado liquor code in connection with its use and possession of the permises as a restaurant. 18. Upon lessee's vacation of the premises after, the term of this lease, or any extention thereof, Leasor shall have the option to purchase the trade fixtures used by Leasee either from Leassee or David p. pieteranglo, either of whom may own such trade fixtures at the time of exercise of this right of first refusal, at the price paid by David P. Pieteranglo fot the aquisition of such trade fixtures at the inception of this lease. 890327 19. I -i^nfln shall contribute a sus of money up to the amoun Igif $ 2, 000. 00 to defrillexpences of remodl.ing currently being incurred by Lessor to prepare the promises for Lessee' s occupance. Leessee shall nquire an ownership intrest in that tertian 8' x20' walk in cooler to the extent he actually contributes such sums lot remodling, which cooler is to he considered one of the trade fixtures addressed in the immediately preceding paragraph. Yid - 4:27/22a UNIWEST Ec I/CO. I .,,;, INC BU: TREASURER BY: PRESIDENT DATE DATE This document was signed by Rick Sekich Treasurer for Uniwest Eq. Company 4322 Hwy. 66 Weld County, Colorado 890327 ARd0a7bd0 • • B 1126 RFC 02067620 09/02/86 14 : 03 $18. 00 1/006 F 0895 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST is made this, 29th day of August, 1986, by and between Nicholas J. Sckich„ Jr. and Karen S. Sekich, whose mailing address is 6769 Weld County Road 32, Longmont, Colorado 80501, and Frederick M. Sekich and Donna L. Sekich, whose mailing address is 1429 Alpine, Longmont, Colorado 80501, hereinafter collectively, jointly and severally referred to as the "Grantor" , and the Public Trustee of the County in which the real property hereinafter described is located ,^ [1 State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "Trustee" , WITNESSE H: THAT, WHEREAS Grantor has executed one certain promissory note, of even date herewith, made payable to the order of FIRST AMERICA SAVINGS BANK, F. S . B. , 400 Lashley, P.O. Box 820, Longmont, Colorado 80501, hereinafter referred to as the Beneficiary, at its office in Longmont , Colorado, or such other place as the holder thereof may designate in writing , for the principal sum of SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ( $750, 000 . 00) , with interest thereon and payable at the beginning rate of eleven and one-half percent ( 11 . 5% ) per annum and adjustable every third year on August 1 to 375 basis points (3. 75%) above the monthly average yield on U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of three years as made available by the Federal Reserve Board , and as provided in the promissory note . The entire balance of principal and all accrued interest is due and payable on August 1, 200G, subject to the attached Call Options Rider, incorporated herein by reference. AND WHEREAS Grantor is desirous of not only securing the prompt payment of the aforesaid indebtedness, but also of efLecti.voly securing the performance and observance of the terms, conditions , covenants and agreements therein and herein contained; NOW THEREFORE Grantor, in consideration of the premises and for the purposes aforesaid has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed and does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Trustee in trust forever the following described property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to wit: Lot A, recorded exemption no. 1207-26-2-RE123, situated in the northwest 1/4, Section 26 , Township 3 North, Range GS West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, located at S-25 . and Colorado Highway 66 , Longmont , Colorado, consisting of approximately 15 . 63 acres more or less. In addition , this deed of trust-, secures all water and water rights, including, but not limited Co, all shares of water stock, all minerals and mineral rights, and all oil, gas and gravel located upon or appurtenant to the above-described real property, and all bonuses , participations, however designated, delay rentals, royalties, proceeds of production and other amounts received by any one or more of the Grantors under each and every oil and gas lease now existing in connection with the above-described real property. This deed of trust includes all buildings , structures and improvements now or hereafter placed on the above-described real property, and all fixtures and equipment now or hereafter attached thereto, and all and singular the rights , hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appurtenant thereto, together with any and all property, real or personal, which may from time to time hereafter be delivered, or by writing of any kind for the purposes hereof be in any way subjected to the lien hereof or be expressly conveyed, mortgaged, assigned , transferred, deposited. and/or pledged by the Grantor to and with the Trustee. This deed of trust also includes any after acquired property interest in the above described real estate which Grantor may at any time hereafter have or acquire , and also all of the tents , issues , use and possession, profits and income of the above described real estate and mortgaged 890327 J B 1126 REC 02067620 09/02/86 14 : 03 $18.00 2/006 F 0896 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO property from new until the debt secured hereby is paid in full . A. Default. To have and to hold the same, together with all and singular the privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in trust nevertheless, in case of default in the payment of the indebtedness, or any part thereof as the same shall become due, or in the case default shall be made in, or in care of violation or breach of any of the terms , conditions , covenants or agreements herein contained, then upon notice and demand in writing filed with the Trustee as provided by law it shall and may be lawful for the Trustee to foreclose this deed of trust and to sell and dispose of the premises en masse or in separate parcels (as the Trustee may think best) and all of the right, title and interest of the Grantor, therein, at public auction at the premises or, at any door or entrance to, or room within any building temporarily or permanently used as a Court Pease, or at or within the building in which is located the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the county wherein the premises or any part thereof is located, for the highest and best price the same will bring in cash, four weeks 7 notice having been previously given of the time and place of such sale by advertisement, weekly, in some newspaper of general circulation, and to issue, execute and deliver Trustee ' s certificate of purchase, Trustee ' s deed or certificate of redemption all as then may be provided by law. The Trustee shall, out of the proceeds or avails of such sale , after first paying and retaining all fees, charges, the cost of making such sale, advertising the premises and attorney ' s fees as herein provided, pay to the beneficiary hereunder or the legal holder of the indebtedness the amount of such indebtedness , and all moneys advanced by the Beneficiary or legal bolder of the indebtedness for insurance, repairs , taxes and assessments , and for any other purpose elsewhere herein authorized, with default interest thereon as provided in the promissory note secured by this deed of trust , rendering any overplus , if any, unto Grantors and/or to any person claiming an interest in the premises by, through or under the Grantor . The sale or sales and such deed or deeds so made shall be a perpetual bar, both in law and equity, against the Grantor and any and all persons claiming the premises aforesaid, or any part thereof by, from, through or under the Grantor. The legal holder of the indebtedness may purchase the property or any part thereof; and it shall not be obligatory upon the purchaser or purchasers at any such sale to see the application of the purchase money. If a release deed is required, the Grantor hereby agrees to pay all the expenses thereof. B. Title. Grantor covenants and agrees to and with the Trustee, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents Grantor is well seized of the premises in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid; hereby fully and absolutely waiving and releasing all rights and claims he may have in or to said premises as a homestead exemption, under and by virtue of any act of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado now existing or which may hereafter be passed in relation thereto; that the same are free and clear of all liens and encumbrances whatever, and for the quiet and peaceable possession of the Trustee, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the Grantor shall and will warrant and forever defend. C. Covenants and Representations. Grantor hereby further covenants and agrees: 1 . Payment Obligations: To promptly pay the principal of and the interest on the indebtedness evidenced by the note secured hereby at the time and in the manner provided therein , in addition to all default interest, late charges and attorney's fees and costs; and 2 . Tax and Insurance $,;eras' Reserve: That together with and in addition to the payments of principal and interest payable under the terms of the note secured hereby, at nenefici.ary's option, Grantor. . 890327 • • • B 1126 REC 02067620 09/02/86 14: 03 $18.00 3/006 F 0897 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO will pay to the Beneficiary, until said note is fully paid, a sum equal to the ground rents next due , plus premiums that will next become due and payable on policies of fire and other hazard insurance, including any required flood insurance, plus the taxes and special assessments next due on the premises covered by this deed of trust (all as estimated by Beneficiary) less all sums already paid therefor divided by the number of months to elapse before one month prior to the date when such ground rents , insurance premiums , taxes and assessments will become clue, said sums to be held by the Beneficiary in trust to pay said ground rents , insurance premiums , taxes and assessments , when the same become due and payable. If the monthly payments made to the Beneficiary for ground rents, insurance premiums , taxes and assessments under this paragraph shall not be sufficient to pay same when due and payable, the Grantor shall after written notice thereof, promptly pay to the Beneficiary any amount necessary to make up the deficiency before the date when said ground rents , insurance premiums , taxes and assessments become delinquent. The aggregate of the sums payable for ground rents , insurance premiums , taxes and assessments in addition to those payable to principal and interest under the terms of the note secured hereby shall be paid in a single payment each month, said payments to be applied to the following items in the order stated: (1) to ground rents, insurance premiums , taxes and assessments ; (2) to interest on the indebtedness secured hereby; and ( 3 ) to payments on the principal of said indebtedness . Any deficiency in the amount of any such aggregate monthly payment shall, unless made good by the Grantor prior to due date of the next such payment constitute an event of default under this deed of trust. 3. Late Charge: The Grantor agrees to pay a late charge not to exceed 52 of the monthly payment not i.n beneficiary's office by the 10th of the month in which it is due, but not to exceed an amount allowed by law. 4 . Insurance: That Grantor will continuously maintain fire, flood and other hazard insurance, of not less than 90% of the replacement cost of the improvements , on the improvements now or hereafter on said premises, and except when payment for all such premiums has theretofore been made under Paragraph 2 hereof, he will pay promptly when due any premiums therefor. All insurance shall be carried in companies approved by the Beneficiary and the policies shall be held by the Beneficiary and have attached thereto loss payable clauses in favor of and in form acceptable to the Beneficiary. That at least fifteen 'days before expiration of each such policy, a renewal thereof or new and sufficient policy to take the place of the one so expiring shall be delivered to the Beneficiary. In event of loss Grantor will give immediate notice by mail to the Beneficiary, who may make proof of loss if not made promptly by the Grantor. Each insurance company concerned is hereby authorized and directed to make payment for such loss directly to the Beneficiary instead of to the Grantor and the Beneficiary jointly . Unless the Beneficiary and Grantor agree otherwise in writing, the insurance proceeds shall be applied first to restoration or repair of the damaged property, provided such restoration or repair is economically feasible and provided that the security of the deed of trust is not thereby impaired. If such restoration or repair is not, in Beneficiary ' s opinion , economically feasible, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to the reduction of the indebtedness secured hereby, with the balance, if any, paid to Grantor. If Grantor fails to respond to Beneficiary within 30 days after notice by Beneficiary to Grantor that the insurance carrier offers to settle a claim for insurance benefits, Beneficiary is authorized to collect and apply the insurance proceeds , at Beneficiary ' s option , either to restoration or repair of the property or to the indebtedness secured by this deed of trust. If the property is acquired by Beneficiary, ail right, title, and interest of Grantor in and to any insurance policies and in and to the proceeds thereof resulting from damage to the property prior to the sale or acquisition shall pass to the Beneficiary. The insurance proceeds, or any part thereof , may be applied by the Beneficiary at its option to the reduction of the indebtedness hereby secured , or to the restoration or repair of the property damaged, or released to Grantor to make the necessary repairs or restoration. In event of foreclosure of this decal of trust, or other transfer of title to the said premises in extinguishment of the indebtedness secured hereby , nil right , 89O327 I • B 1126 REC 02067620 09/02/86 14 : 03 $18. 00 4/006 - F 0898 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO title, and interest of the Grantor in and to any insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser or Grantee. - 5 . Waste: That Grantor shall not commit or permit waste on said property, or remove or destroy any portion thereof and shall _ maintain the property in good repair and condition. On any failure so to maintain, Beneficiary, at its option, may declare the indebtedness in default or may cause reasonable maintenance and repair work to be performed and any such amount so paid shall be added to the indebtedness and such disbursements shall be part of the secured indebtedness hereunder. 6. condemnation: That all judgments , decrees anu warrants for injury or damage to the mortgaged property and all awards pursuant to proceedings for condemnation or under power or eminent domain are hereby assigned by Grantor in their entirety and shall be paid to the - Beneficiary who, at its option, may apply the same to the reduction of the indebtedness secured hereby, or to the restoration or repair of the property damaged, or release said payment to the Grantor to make _ the necessary restoration or repairs . Beneficiary is hereby empowered, in the name of the Grantor, to receive and give acquittance for and to appeal from any such award, judgment or decree whether it be joint or several . It is agreed that when all or any part of the above-described property is condemned or taken under power of eminent - domain Beneficiary may collect from Grantor a reasonable replacement cost or prepayment fee on all condemnation payments or awards applied to reduce or pay in full the principal amount remaining due on the above-described Note ( in excess of amounts due and payable or of prepayments permitted to be paid without premium or penalty under the terms and conditions of said Note) and may also collect from 'Grantor. - all costs and expenses incurred by the Beneficiary in connection with _ such condemnation. 7 . Taxes : The Grantor will pay when due all taxes , assessments or any other indebtedness which may be secured by lien or charge on the premises superior to the lien hereof, and upon request exhibit satisfactory evidence of the discharge of any such prior lien to the Beneficiary. 8 . Entry and Inspection: That the Beneficiary is hereby given the right of entry on said mortgaged property at any reasonable time for the purpose of inspecting said property. 9. Legal Compliance: That the Grantor will comply with all - laws , acts , rules , regulations and orders of any federal , state , municipal, legislative, administrative or judicial body, commission or - officer exercising any power of regulation or supervision over the Grantor or the mortgaged property for the construction , use or operation thereof ; provided, however that the Grantor may contest any - such law, act, rule, regulation or, order in any reasonable manner which will not affect the interest of the Beneficiary to any part of the mortgaged property. 10. Attorney' s Fees and Costs : That Grantor agrees to and - will promptly pay all costs, charges and expenses incurred by the - Beneficiary, including attorney ' s fees , arising out cf or in connection with any action , proceeding , or hearing , legal or otherwise , in any way affecting or relating to the secured property, - this deed of trust, or t' e aforesaid note secured hereby, and agrees to hold Beneficiary harmless with regard to any such action , - proceeding or hearing. 11 . Advances and Non-Waiver of Default: That in the event the Beneficiary incurs any expense for the performance of any defaulted - covenant, agreement or act of the Grantor as provided herein, then any moneys advanced by the Beneficiary for such purpose shall bear interest at the rate of two percent over the applicable interest rate under the terms of the promissory note and shall become a part of the indebtedness secured by this inr;.r'mient_ ratably and on a parity with all other indebtedness secured hereby, and shall be immediately due and payable without notice . Inaction by the Beneficiary shall never. 890327 - • • B 1126 REC 02067620 09/02/86 14 : 03 $18. 00 5/006 F 0899 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO be considered as a waiver of any right accruing to said Beneficiary on account of any default hereunder on the part of the Grantor. Failure of the Beneficiary to exercise any option granted herein shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to exercise such option in the event of any subsequent default. 12. Acceleration: In the event of any one or more default(s) in the payment of the indebtedness or any part thereof, or of a breach or violation of any of the covenants or agreements herein, or of a breach of any one or more covenants in any other security document or agreement executed in connection with the loan secured by this deed of trust, then, in that event, the whole of the indebtedness and the accrued interest thereon shall bear interest at the default rate provided in the note to date of payment, and such indebtedness may at once, at the option of the Beneficiary or the legal holder of the indebtedness, be declared due and payable in full, and the premises may be sold in the manner and with the same effect as if the indebtedness had matured. Beneficiary shall also have all cumulative and non-exclusive rights and remedies provided by law. If foreclosure is made by the Trustee , such reasonable attorney ' s fee as the Beneficiary may he required to pay for services in the supervision of such foreclosure proceedings shall be allowed and added by the Public Trustee as a part of the cost of foreclosure . If foreclosure be by action in Court, a reasonable attorney ' s fee shall be taxed by the Court as a part of the cost of such foreclosure proceedings. 13. Due on Sale: Except as may be otherwise provided herein, Beneficiary shall have the right, at its option, to declare all sums secured hereby, including, but not limited to, the principal amount and accrued interest immediately due and payable in full, if Grantor or any successor in interest to Grantor, without Beneficiary ' s prior written consent, which may be withheld for any reason: (a) conveys, transfers or assigns the property or any part thereof, whether by deed, wrap around transaction, contract for deed, lease with option to buy, or otherwise; or (b) further encumbers or alienates the property, ,7 or any part thereof; or (c) leases the property or any part thereof for a term, together with all exercisable options, of /p years or more; !�J or (d ) suffers its title or any interest therein to be divested, 95 whether voluntarily or involuntarily; or (e) changes or permits to be chanced the character or use of the property; or (f) allows any one or more ownership interest(s) in Grantor to be assigned, transferred or conveyed , whether voluntarily or not. If any one or more of the events enumerated in the preceding subparagraphs ( a ) to ( f ) , inclusive , occur , and if Beneficiary consents to the same, such consent shall not be deemed or construed as a waiver, and the advance written consent of Beneficiary shall be required on all successive occurrences. Further, Beneficiary may condition its consent to the receipt of additional monetary consideration and other requirements acceptable to Beneficiary, in its sole dincreti.on. 14. Lien: The lien of this instrument shall remain in full force and effect during any postponement or extension of the time of payment of the indebtedness or any part thereof secured hereby. 15 . Possession: In the event of default hereunder , the Beneficiary, or the holder of the indebtedness or certificate of sale, shall at once become entitled to the possession, use, and enjoyment of the property aforesaid, and in such event the Grantor hereby assigns to the Beneficiary or holder of the indebtedness all the rents , issues and profits of said property, from the accruing of such right and during the period of the default, pendency of foreclosure proceedings and the period of redemption, if any there be. If there are any costs and expenses reasonably necessary to be incurred in connection with the subject real property and improvements thereon in order to successfully operate and maintain the subject real property and improvements , the Lender may pay such amounts, and such amounts shall be additional indebtedness under the Promissory Note secured by- this Deed of Trust. The delivery of such possession may be enforced by the party entitled thereto by any appropriate civil suit or proceedings , and such party shall be entitled to a receiver for such property, and of the rents, issues and profits thereof, after any such default , including the time covered by foreclosure proceedings and the period +ry 890321 o • . • B 1126 REC 02067620 09/02/86 14 : 03 $18.00 6/006 F 0900 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO of redemption, if any there be . Such entitlement shall exist as a matter of right without regard to the solvency or insolvency of the Grantor or of the then owner of said property and without regard to the value of the. property. Such receiver may be appointed by any court of competent jurisdiction upon ex parte application, notice thereof being hereby expressly waived, and the appointment of any such receiver, on any such application with or without notice, is hereby consented to. All rents, issues and profits, income and revenue of said property shall be applied by such receiver according. to law and the orders and directions of the court. 16 . Binding Effect: The covenants herein contained shall . bind, and the benefits and advantages shall inure to, the respective heirs , executors , administrators , successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Whenever used, the singular, number shall include the plural , the plural the singular and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders , and the term "Beneficiary" shall include any payee of the indebtedness hereby secured or any transferee thereof whether by operation of law or otherwise. 17 . Statutes : Should any provision of this Deed o£ Trust be found to violate the statutes or court decisions of the State of Colorado, or the United States at the time this document was signed, then such provision shall be deemed to be amended to comply with and conform to such statutes and decisions in force on the date of signing of this document. 18. Paragraph Captions: The captions of the paragraphs are set forth only for convenience and reference, and are not intended in any way to define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of this agreement. 19 . Exhibits: All exhibits, addendums and riders attached to this deed of trust or recorded in connection with this deed of trust shall be a part of this deed of trust as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument on August 29, 1936- Ni r /n 7144/ •4 fie/Nicholas JI Sekich, J . \, r f 1.� . A_JAI.., iC i n S. Sekich Frede .ick M. Sekich Donna L. Sekich " STATE OF COLORADO ) ss . COUNTY OF BOULDER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .27 claX,9fS,f, 7r .,P,./ , 1986, by Nicholas J. Sekich, Jr . , i:aren S. tSak.i.dri*Mr.tedeerick M. Sekich and Donna L. Sekich. N��¢ co':cimission expires: __I- , ,.. :57; 71 v••• A0d 0• i 4:fl s my hand and official seal. `. .:^ _ Notary Public sea327 7 �1 •410.6, -9t et, c7'rc �— "4<IS� "re, '.,�. �Li(/f' L____! ( T 11� `� �� v ? • Y ; - 7 813 Ili fret: ,cK-thevd-,.J -�°o w i11 J...$ Se.4riiv-�'' Cioj' ,1 . .Q ci_______/lc, rt.- 5/T. . yoe-/- "ft,/ e... e. . X • e_4-- \) ,., 4;/ cede. gilt .e . @.til :, , f J /Jn Dom` �f jet, g S('lvzc8h 6a wan/14.4( Sti , ,%, I" a -- - tI em/ - 1 s.i• I iM ft. P+ �f • /C/4 c. 4. wore sx '' v. __ —s tire'0 ._..Pr Ii#2a .` p/s ! i�, 4,�,� 7 � KIr _ _ • _ • y St'yT. • • AFFIDAVIT SOURCE OF FUNDING OF DBP, INC. All funds invested in DBP, Inc. , a Colorado corporation in good standing, are from the personal resources of David B. Pietrangelo. VERIFICATION STATE OF COLORADO) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER) I, DAVID B. PIETRANGELO, the President/Treasurer of DBP, Inc. referred to herein, first being duly sworn upon oath, depose and say: That I have read the above and foregoing Affidavit and that the facts contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. G6 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of February, 1989. r V4 Not1 IPubliC My commission expires: 11-1-92 V "` 1 89®32'7 - - • DR 0401.1(140) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Sorest Denver,Colorado 80281 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership.each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE; This Individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered In their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself oonstfutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant. 1, Name of Business: Date: soeS Deafly Number: Peter Angela' s Recta„rant I 7--9 —St I 273-32-8269 2, Your Full Name:(WVflreymiddte) 3, Mao Knomn As: (mean nenwnian.m.,sd.) David Barry Pietrangelo n/a 4.)Mailing Addresa: (if different from residence) I Home Teas:Mo n: 772-3961 5,Residence Address: (street and number,city,state.zip 79RQ1 rlmnra Dyad, tongm^„ pr1Cf)n 6. Is your reaaena: ft rented,horn whom? 9C OWNED ❑ RENTED 7, Date of Binh: Pla of Birth: a, U.S.Cinnen7 4-17-39 Lakewood.Ia Ohio ®YES 0 N H naturalized,state wh«e: wn.n: Mn of U.S.Dlatrla Court n/a NaturWixaoon Certificate No.: Daze of Certificate: if m Mon,Oa AVM's Registration Card No.:rermanam Resldena Card No.: O Height Weont Mak C Eye Go Sex: Ras: 10.Do You have a COlorsdo CAN,Worse a yes:glue number: 5' 10" 205 Iorr:Br Ilai Br I N I Cauc 2 YES 0 N 13168741 II, what Is your matronship to the eopiant7(sole crow,parrs,connate pillar,drew.srod uoldW or manic.'): corporate officer; director & stockholder 12. If Stockholder,Number of Snares Owned Beneficially Or of Record: Percent of Ousandino Stock Owned: 4500 100 13.11 Perbw,slate flaw: Proem of Paronry,lp Beneficially Carnet 0 GENERAL ❑ LIMITED n/a 14.Name of Present Emptyer: 15.Type of Burns of Employment self(Pietrangelo's Hay Service) agriculture (hay supply) 10,Address of Business Mere Employed:(street and nilnaer,ay,sate.zip) Business Telephone: 13801 Elmore Road, Longmont, CO 80501 772-3961 . 17.Present Position: owner 1t.Marital Status: 10.Name of Spouse:(Mdude moan inn d applicable) married I Gavnelle E. Pietranaelo (Rohr) 20.Spouse's Oka of Binh: Spouse's Pace of Binh: 3-4-41 I Dayton, Ohio 21.Spouse's residence address.If different dnn yours:(pia.beet and number.oy,sate.zip) n/a 22.Spouse's Present Employe: Occupation: Pietrangelo's Hay Service I opera«n>- r3.Address see #16 s°°g abov°ie«: 24,cast the name(*)of all relatives wonino in We Ipur Indusay,give rake none Name of Relative: I Relationship to You: Portion led: Nets of Employ*: Loosdan of Employe: I . CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE . 89032'7 25.DO you now,or have you ever held a dart or indirect Intern in a State of Cobrado Llqua Cr Beer License? It yes,'anent in detail. Beer and wine license held by La Tosca, Inc. 8000 W. Colfax, ®YES ONO Lakewood, CO, a Colorado corporation, in which appliqant had a 1/3 equity interest and was manager in 1969 -^-Lo≤wiry, /9e,q 28.Do you now,or haw you over had a dina of Indirect Interest in a liquor Or beer Nowise,or been employed in a liquor or bee related business outside Of the State of CObrado? If yea.'demob.in detail. Employed as cook by Caminati 's Restarant in Cleveland, OH ®YES ❑ o 1960-1965 27.Flaw you ewer been derwbsd of a alms,fried,imprisoned,placed on prbbaton.received a suspended sentence Or krtalted ball for any offense in criminal Or mfitary ooun7(Do not Inoluda traffic violation.,unless they resulted in sspenson or t.vocabon of your drawee license,a you were corMarid of driving under me influence of alcoholic bevaregee,) dyes:*spot in ant. ❑YES ®N0 26. Have you ever received a*Salon rode,suspension Or rwscatbn far a liquor law t+oladon,at been denied a liquor or bear Hone.anywhere In the US.? II'yea:explain In drat YES pN0 29.Haw you emir held a gambling or gaming von.or owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? ff yes;explain in detail b.Iow. YES ENO State/Federal: I Year: City: I State: StatarFederal: I.Year: City: I State: 30.Wits,Service:(branch) I Fr: To: Seal No.: Type Of Discharge: Coast Guard 1958 1964 2630=766 I Honorable 31.List all addresses where you have lived for the last five pen,(Attach upstate onset it necessary) Street and Number City,State,Zip From: To: 13801 Elmore Rd. , Longmont. Cf) 80501 ' 1973 row I I I I 32.List Wormer empown Or bwinaans ertpaged in Wtln 7w list five years.(Attach aspaate sheets if necessar,,) Name of ampover:. . Address:(sti t.number,city.sate,cep) Poston Held: From: To: self sane as #32 Ow=r 33.List tie names and attach letters of recommendation from three persons who cen vouch for your good character and nose In connection With this applcedon. Nano of reference: Address:(fleet,number,city,earn,xp) I M.or Yeas Knpwrr: Jack Eckert 13687 Elmore Rd. , Longmont, CO 80501 I 16 Larry Nelson 13761 Elmore Rd. , Longmont, CO 80501 I 16 John Boh 19714 West 77th Dr. , Arvada, CO 80005 I 21 OATH OF APPLICANT /declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto,and that all informatio"therein is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Singagha: /�/i ter U.: Os: 141//1 /i �� il Pres., Treas. ✓ce 89032'7 . A r • • 1 DR Not-I(ter) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIOUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 50261 To be completed by each Individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and I over 5N.stockholder of a oublic corporation, and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL • questions must be answered In their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness, A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application a such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant. I. Name Bueneee: PewSees Seeway Nue+aec Teter Angelo's Restaurant I 1283-38-9268 2. Your Full Name:(ISW svmddle) 3. Awan As: (maven wnwdaname.etc.) 1 Gaynelle Elizabeth Pietrangelo Ale Kr Gay Pietrangelo I 4,)M&Iing Addy...: (n VI MGM horn reMI MIC*) I IIOnw 772 L,tepww: —3961 5.Reedenoe Address: (meet and number.dy,eta.zip 1 • 13801 Elmore Road, Longmont, CO 80501 6, is your resideroe: I R rented.nom whom? ®OWNED 0 REM S 7. Date of Del: Plead Bier: S. US.CMzen? 3-4-41 Dayton, Ohio ®Yes ❑ND J It awaked.state where: When: None of U.S.Devdt Court n/a • Natwallzsddn Cerbeate No,: Date of Cytincaee: If en seen,give Alien's Regimen Card No.:IlfPwnWWIt Rwdence Card No.-. 0. Hecht WMoWhomleek Color: Eye Color: Sex: Race: t0.Do you nave a Colorado Drives License? ryes,"give number. 5 '3" 125 ' Br Br I F Cauc M yEs DND F102178 I i, Whit is your niatgMhip to re Kfolts at7(sole owns,penny,corporate clnoe,erector,storAnoio.r or managed: corporate officer 12. II Stockholder,Hunter of Shane Owned Benecialy or d Record: Avant of Outstanding Stock Owned; n/a none n.If Parve,sow vntede: Percent of PaysNb 6enedolalty Owned: 0 GENERAL ❑ LIMITED 14.Name of Present Employer: 15.Type of Siamese of Employment Pietrangelo's Hay Service agriculture (hav suo ly' I0.Address of Business Wore Employed:(street and number•dye eate.AO Qualities rotenone: I 13801 Elmore Road, Longmont, CO 80501 I 772-3961 17.Pendell Paloon:operator 'I it Math Starve: f0,Name of Spcu5:(Ndude maven new If en able) married I David B. Pietrangelo 20,Spouse'.Date or BUN: Spouses Place of Binh: 4-17-39 + Lakewood, Ohio 21.Spouse's reedence sarass,if deferent own yews:(e»some and number.oy.state.Zip) n/a 22 Spouses Present Employs: I OobWsdon: self - CO - woR/Ccae c H/ FARM owner/operator a Addend of Spouse's Present Employer: same as #16 . 24.List die name(.)of all relative working in the NM Industry.Ow their: inn,. Wane of Relay.: Relationship to You: Position herd: Nome of Employer: lemon of Employe: CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE , • ' p! �• ' .y 89032/ A • • w _ 26.00 you IS,Or Mn you ever rata a aroma indirect Inner In s State of Colorado Liquor a Seer Mans.? It yn;wawa let dotal. OYES ®NO 26.Do you now.or hint you eve,had a direct at InNrg nrarau In■aqua at beer Oconee,a been employed Ina Ifouor at beer raised buan.s wale of the Sam or Colorado? ('ye.;0.1010.In dotal. OYES ®►)O 27.Have you w.bean eonncf.d of a onm.,Anal,Imprisoned,placed on probEa,r.o.iwd a l,aOenood sentience a forfatad ball for ay ranee in criminal Or meipry Coon?(Co not Include vatic vckdons,taw they nwlud in suspenson Of revocation of your drivers Nana.Or you were convicted of rw.o under the Inituana of Scohgc berme..) If yea;axplaN In deed. ❑ YE5 ®so 26. Have you awe received a ylcdaclon nods,suspension Or nwcaeon for■liquor Is s olaoon,or bean&mod a liquor or beer borne anywhere N Ow U.S.? If ye.;.XpNln In Ong. OYES ®NO . 20,taw you ever had a gambNrq a earning Nana of owned■Fedoral Gambling guano? A yea,'stain In dnl below. ❑YEs ®No State/Federal: - Yawl; Ciy: Slate: Stau/Federal: Yew: City: Stara: 30.Musty Service:(branclO From: To: I Swill Na.: Type of pahag.: none at.LIE all addresses whw,you have lived for tin leaf five yaws.(Attach Mown..Iwi if nnnwy) Sveet wet Number City.State,Zip I From: To: 13801 Elmore Rd. Longmont, CO 80501 1971 now I 32.List aA forma employers or bu.waness anoaoed In will,'yie last Ave yews.(Amara separate sheets if neasMrs.f Nem*of employer:. )(Amor(arrest number,off.sat..zip) Position NMI: From: to: ` I 33.List ea names and attain Ienars of Mamrtwndation from wee arsons who an vouch for your 000d&arsftar and fitness M Connection wan Otk.ppliatlon. Nemo of r tere o.: I Address:(ant number,city,state,zip) I No.of Yeats known: Jack Eckert 113687 Elmore Rd. , Longmont, CO 80501 I 16 Larry Nelson 113761 Elmore Rd. , Longmont, CO 80501 1 16 John Boh 19714 West 77th Dr. , Arvada, CO 80005 I 21 • OATH OF APPLICANT t declare under penalty of pe4ury In the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto,and that all Informatioi therein is true,correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. �S payll�ra`s` TIM: ( n .� /�1t31 Secretary � 1 ��' i n 890327 • • ■ • • STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE CERTIFICATE T, NATALIE MEYER, Secretary of State of the State of Colorado hereby certify that the prerequisites for the issuance of this certificate have been fulfllied in Compli- ance with law and are found to conform to law. Accordingly, the undersigned, by virtue of the authority vested in me by law, hereby issues A CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO DBP, INC. State of Colorado) ) ss. County of Boulder) 1; Lynda Bryson, a Notary Public in and for said state. do certify that on February 8, 1989, 1 carefully compared with the originals, the attached facsimiles of the certificate and articles of incorporation for DBP, Inc. and the facsimiles .are comlete, full, true, and exact facsimiles of the documents they purport to reproduce. My commission expires: 11-1-92 Dated: JANUARY 29, 2989 • • • • ota Pub is SECRETARY OF STATE • • 890327 i • e ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF DBP, INC. I, the undersigned natural person of the age of twenty-one years of age or more, acting as incorporator of a corporation under the Colorado Corporation Code, adopt the following Articles of Incorporation for such Corporation. ARTICLE I The name of the Corporation is DBP, Inc. ARTICLE II The period of duration of the Corporation shall be perpetual. ARTICLE III The nature, objects, and purposes of the business to be conducted and transacted by such Corporation shall be to engage in any lawful business activities authorized or permitted by the Colorado Corporation Code. ARTICLE IV In furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article III of these Articles of Incorporation, the Corporation shall have and may exercise all of the rights, powers, and privileges now or hereafter conferred upon corporations organized under and pursuant to the laws of the State of Colorado, including but not limited to, the power to enter into general partnerships, limited partnerships, whether the Corporation be a limited or general partner, joint ventures, syndicates, pools, associations, and other arrangements for carrying on one or more of the purposes set forth in these Articles of Incorporation, jointly or in common with others. In addition, the Corporation may do everything necessary, suitable, or proper for the accomplishment of any of its corporate purposes. ARTICLE V 1. Authorized Shares. The aggregate number of shares which this Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 48,000 shares of common stock, each having no par value. All stock of the Corporation shall be of the same class, common, and shall have the same rights and preferences. Fully-paid stock of this Corporation shall not be liable to any further call or assessment. 893327 2. Transfer Restrictions. Stockholders of this Corporation shall and may not sell, encumber, pledge, or transfer any of their shares without the consent of shareholders owning a majority of the outstanding issued shares of the Corporation. By appropriate action, the Corporation shall have the right to impose additional restrictions upon the transfer of any shares of its capital stock which may be issued from time to time, or any interest therein, provided that the restriction imposed above, or those which may additionally be imposed, shall be set forth upon the face or back of the certificates representing such shares of common stock. The Corporation may become a party to agreements entered into by any of its shareholders re-restricting transfer or encumbrance of any of its shares, or subjecting any of its shares to re-purchase or re-sale obligations. 3 . Pre-emptive Riahts Denied. Shareholders shall have no pre-emptive rights to acquire additional or treasury shares of the Corporation or securities convertible into shares, or stock rights or options. 4 . No Cumulative Voting. Each shareholder or record shall have one vote for each share of stock standing in his name on the books of the Corporation and entitled to vote. Cumulative voting shall not be allowed in the election of Directors or for any other purposes. 5. Cuorun. At all meetings of shareholders, two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum. 6. Issuance an4 Sale of Shares. Shares of this Corporation not having a par value shall to issued for such consideration expressed in dollars as may be fixed from time to time by the vote of the Directors. 7 . pigtributians. The Board of Directors may from time to time distribute to the shareholders in partial liquidation, out of stated capital or capital surplus of the corporation, a portion of its assets, in cash or property, subject to the limitations contained in the statutes of Colorado. ARTICLE VI 1. Initial Board of DirQcto . The initial Board of Directors shall consist of one (1) member. The number of directors of this Corporation shall otherwise be fixed in accordance with the bylaws adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors. So long as the number of directors shall be less than three: a. No shares of this Corporation may be used and held of record by more shareholders than there are directors. 820327 ' • • b. Any shares issued in violation of this paragraph shall be null and void. c. This provision shall also constitute a restriction on the transfer of shares and the legend shall be conspicuously placed on each certificate respecting shares preventing transfers of the shares to more shareholders than there are directors. 2. Director. The name and address of the person who is to serve as Director until the first annual meeting of shareholders and until his successors are elected and shall qualify is: Name: Address: David 8. Pietrangelo 13801 Elmore Rd. Longmont, Colorado 80501 ARTICLE VII The address of the initial registered office of the Corporation is 713 - 3rd Avenue, Longmont, CO 80501. The name of its initial registered agent at such address is Philip Bryson, P.C. The Corporation may conduct part or all of its business in any other part of Colorado, of the United States, or of the World. It may hold, purchase, mortgage, lease, and convey real and personal property in any of such places. ARTICLE VIII The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and for the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and the same are in furtherance of and not in limitation or exclusion of the power conferred by law. 1. Contracts with Djrectors. etc. No contract or other transaction of this Corporation with any other person, firm, or corporation, or in which this Corporation is interested, shall be affected or invalidated by: (a) the fact that any one or more of the Directors or officers of this Corporation is interested in or is a Director or officer of another corporation; or (b) the fact that any Director or officer, individually or jointly with others, may be party to or may be interested in any such contract or transaction. Each person who may become a Director or officer of this Corporation is hereby relieved from any liability that might otherwise arise by reason of his contracting with his Corporation for the benefit of himself or any firm or corporation in which he may be in any way interested. 2. Negation oc Ecuitable Interests in Sharps or Rights,. This Corporation shall be entitled to treat the registered holder 890327 • a ♦ of any shares of the Corporation as the owner thereof for all purposes, including all rights deriving from such shares, and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to, or interest in, such shares or rights deriving from such shares, on the part of any other person, including, but not limiting the generality hereof, a purchaser, assignee, transferee, of such shares or rights deriving from such shares, unless and until such purchaser, assignee, or transferee, or other such person becomes the registered holder of such shares, whether or not the Corporation shall have either actual or constructive notice of the interest of such purchaser, assignee, or transferee or other person. The purchaser, assignee, or transferee of any of the shares of the Corporation shall not be entitled: to receive notice of the meetings of the shareholders; to be paid dividends or other sums payable to shareholders: or to own, enjoy, and exercise any other property or rights deriving from such shares against the Corporation, until such purchaser, assignee, or transferee has become the registered holder of such shares. ARTICLE IX The name and address of each incorporator is as follows: David B. Pietrangelo 13801 Elmore Rd. Longmont, Colorado 80501 VERIFICATION State of Colorado) County of Boulder) ss. I hereby certify that on the day of ?cna.., 1989, David B. Pietrangelo personally appeared before me and having been by me first duly sworn, declared that he is the person who signed the foregoing document as incorporator, and that the statements therein contained are true. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal . My commission expires: Notary Public 890327 ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING CONSENT OF DIRECTOR AND SHAREHOLDER OF DBP, INC. Pursuant to the Colorado Corporation Code the undersigned, being the initial director of DBP, Inc. , a Colorado corporation hereinafter called the Corporation, acting at the call of the incorporator, hereby consents to and takes the following actions, this .lc; day of , 1989. 1. INCORPORATION: The executon of Articles of Incorporation on January 18, 1989, and the issuance of a Certificate of Incorporation by the State of Colorado on January 19, 1989, is acknowledged, and the Certificate of Incorporation and Articles of Incorporation are to be placed in the Corporate Records Book. 2. DIRECTOR: The following person is elected a director of the Corporation, to serve until the annual meeting 15 days before the end of the fiscal year, commencing in 1989 and continuing in succeeding years, and until successor directors are elected and shall qualify: DAVID B. PIETRANGELO 3 . BY-LAWS: The by-laws, the originals of which are to be placed in the Corporate Records Book, and are dated this date and signed by the Secretary, are adopted as the by-laws of the Corporation. 4 . SEAL: The seal of the Corporation shall contain the name of the Corporation, and the words, "Corporate Seal, " and "Colorado, " in the form impressed on the margin of this page. 5. STOCK CERTIFICATES: The certificates representing common stock of the Corporation shall be substantially in the form of the specimen copy contained in the Corporate Records Book which is attached to this Consent. 6. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Each of the following persons is elected to the office set forth opposite his name, to serve until the annual meeting of directors, and until his or her successor is elected and has qualified: DAVID B. PIETRANGELO President/Treasurer GAYNELLE E. PIETRANGELO Secretary 890327 A . • • • 7 . OFFICERS AND AGENTS: The officers of the Corporation are authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to designate and change the location of all necessary Certificates, reports, powers of attorney, and other instruments as may be required by the laws of any State, territory, dependency or country, and to authorize the Corporation to transact business therein. Further, the officers are authorized to revoke any such appointment and to take such other action as they may deem necessary or advisable to terminate the authority of the Corporation to do business in any State, territory, dependency, or country. 8 . REGISTERED AGENT: PHILIP BRYSON, P.C. , 713 - 3rd Avenue, Longmont, Colorado 80501, is hereby appointed as attorney and registered agent of the Corporation. 9. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS: The Corporation shall conduct its business of operating a restaurant at 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, CO 80501 in Weld County. • 10. ACTS OF INCORPORATOR: The acts of the incorporator in incorporating and organizing the Corporation, in selecting legal counsel, accountants, in making bank arrangements, in securing trade fixtures and equipment for the operation of the restaurant, and in securing possession of the principal place of business by lease, are ratified, confirmed, and approved; and the incorporator shall hereafter be indemnified and held harmless by this Corporation from any liability arising out of the incorporation or organization of the Corporation. 11. TRADE NAME: The Corporation shall conduct its business using the trade name of Peter Angelo's Restaurant, and, in this regard, the officers of the Corporation are authorized and directed to file such trade name of record with the Department of Revenue or other governmental agency as may be necessary or advisable. 12. ISSUANCE OF STOCK: David B. Pietrangelo shall transfer to the Corporation by bill of sale in the form appended hereto the food inventory, equipment, and the trade fixtures to be used upon the premises known as 4322 Highway 66, Longmont, CO 80501. The board of directors assigns a value of $3,000. 00 to the property contributed to the Corporation by David B. Pietrangelo. The officers of the Corporation are hereby authorized to issue 3, 000 shares of no par common stock to be evidenced by Certificate No. 1 to David B. Pietrangelo. 13. COMPENSATION: Salaries shall be regularly paid to the persons designated as Officers of the Corporation as provided by the board of directors from time to time at regular or special meetings. 14 . OFFICER'S INCAPACITY AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY: In cases 890327 where one officer is incapacitated or is desirous of delegating his authority, he shall communicate this verbally or in writing to the other. Should an officer be incapacitated so that he is unable to communicate, this delegation of authority shall be automatic. 15. OPERATION OF BUSINESS: The proper officers of the Corporation are authorized and directed to proceed with the organization and operation of this Corporation for its intended purposes, and in that connection such officers are authorized and directed to apply for such licenses and obtain such permits, or other authorizations as may be required, for the Corporation to lawfully commence and carry on its business. The officers of the corporation are further authorized and directed to make application to the Weld County Commissioners for a hotel and restaurant license under the provisions of the Colorado Liquor Code. Acts previously performed by officers of the. Corporation in the foregoing regard are ratified. Consented to and executed this - -/ day of 1989. , i7 David B. Pietrangelo' ATTEST: ( • It 1 I� `(J t -secr�:"tary �j 890327 • • AFFIDAVIT STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DBP, INC. Pursuant to the organizational meeting of DBP, Inc. , a Colorado corporation, paragraph 12 thereof, dated January 20, 1989, directed that 3,000 shares of the common stock of DBP, Inc. be issued to David B. Pietrangelo. Pursuant to said paragraph 12 of the organizational meeting, this 3, 000 shares reflects 100% of the outstanding shares of stock of DBP, Inc. and is evidenced by Certificate No. 1 issued to David B. Pietrangelo. VERIFICATION STATE OF COLORADO) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER) I, DAVID 8. PIETRANGELO, the President/Treasurer of DBP, Inc. referred to herein, first being duly sworn upon oath, depose and say: That I have read the above and foregoing Affidavit and that the facts contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Lk /;✓tA /2 , 1A-�LF/ir:✓y/1 p4y, Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of February, 1989. iota blir/ My commission expires: 11-1-92 690327 • • February 9, 1989 Weld County Commissioners P. 0. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 re: David B. Pietrangelo Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo DBP, Inc. Dear Sirs: I have known David B. and Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo since 1973 when they moved with their family onto Elmore Road in Weld County. I have known them socially over that period of time, and have had business dealings with them, primarily purchasing hay that they grow, swath and bale. On the basis of my ongoing contact with them for these 15 years, X believe them to be of good moral and business character, and to be financially responsible people. I am looking forward to the opening of Peter Angelo's Restaurant and hope that I can get a beer with my meal. Sincerely, Larry Nelson 13761 Elmore Road Longmont, CO 80501 /3- / c:Vaer, Wso/ 89032'7' s • February 9, 1989 weld County Commissioners P. 0. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 re: David B. Pietrangelo Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo DBP, Inc. Dear Sirs: I have known David B. and Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo for 12 years. They have purchased farm implements from time to time from the family business, have entered into crop share arrangements with members of my family, and I have known them socially as well. On the basis of my ongoing contact with them for these 12 years, I believe them to be of good moral and business character, and to be financially responsible people. Sincerely, /VIII Rick Sekich 4322 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 8S0327 • I February 9, 1989 Weld County Commissioners P. 0. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 re: David B. Pietrangelo Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo DBP, Inc. Dear Sirs: I have known David B. and Gaynelle E. Pietrangelo since 1973 when they moved with their family onto Elmore Road in Weld County. I have known them socially over that period of time, and have had business dealings with them, primarily purchasing hay that they grow, swath and bale. On the basis of my ongoing contact with them for these 15 years, I believe them to be of good moral and business character, and to be financially responsible people. I am looking forward to the opening of Peter Angelo's Restaurant and hope that I can get a beer with my meal. Sincerely, Jack Eckert 13687 Elmore Road Longmont, CO 80501 /3L?7 R/ 890327 a 1 State of Colorado ;; Cepartmene of novenae Liouor Enforcement 04*/on • 7375 Putman Street Denver.Colorado 80251 3035664741 MANAGER'S REGISTRATION FORM • Form must be completed by all Hotel and Restaurant Licensees employing a separate and distinct manager. • Form must be submitted to and approved by Local Licensing Authority, • A state and local fee of$75 is required for Hotel and Restaurant applicants. DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE • Managers must complete and submit form DAL 404.1 (Individual History " Record). • Managers must submit fingerprints to local licensing authority. 1. ACCOUNT NO,OF LICENSEE: • Attach a copy of any written management contracts or agreements. 41 -24 P RINT IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITE. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. ANY FALSE FEE: STATEMENT OR ANSWER MAY RESULT IN THE REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE. (9) $75.00 2: NAME OF CURRENT LICENSEE; 2,GLASS OP LICENSE: r.,a P i4'& . /Ate L 4 rents . 4. RAGE NAME SP ESTABLISHMENT (OBA): '6, BUSINESS TELEPHONE: aT Ac a.o '5 R 4t sas- 9Y7y 6. ADORESS OF LICENSED ESTABLISHMENT: CITY/TOWN STATE ZIP #3.z2 ist .b G Ode nrovt Coto &aS o f �7, NA OP MANA�9.ER; B,DATE EMPLOYMENT BEGAN: 9. EXPIRATION DATE; R Cy- �4✓RE/4 „Frill-.P4 , 10. COMPENSATION/ OF MANAGER: I1, DID MANAGER E V6r/MANAGE LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT IN ANY OTHER S 71/011A1 Y' W,ar_; itz_O" STATE? g P40 ❑ YES If yes,glv a•r•Ila 12, ODES MANAGER HAVE A FI ANCIAL INTEREST IN ANY OTHER LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT? ❑ YES X NO IF YES,GIVE NAME AND LOCATION OF ESTABLISHMENT: 13, DOES MANAGER MANAGE ANOTHER 'HOTEL OR RESTAURANT" LICENSED LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT IN COLORADO? ❑ Yes X. NO IP YES,GIVE NAME AND LOCATION OP ESTABLISHMENT; OATH OF APPLICANT 1 declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing registration and all attachments thereto,and chat all information therein is true,correct,and complete to the best of my knowledge. sr TURF P LICENS TITLE: IJ0R{ I DATE: � � � 4 hen edh sl .-sue- €7 SIG URE OF MANAGER: 0 'DATE: CL)AYf4"."I r , 0,7 /71/4/71/40-1,..e?,. o - 7- 7,7-29 - v% • REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY The foregoing has been examined and the character of the registrant is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of Title 12. Article 47,C.R.S,as amended.THEREFORE THIS REGISTRATION IS HEREBY APPROVED. LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY I.0.NUMBER: I LOCAL.LtLtNwnq AUTHORITY (arty or L0untyl: 1 Weld County $F" REI / TITLE: DAT . �/f Chairman, Board of Commissioner 4/12/89 I ' RECOMMENDATION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATOR SIGNED: I GATE: ❑ APPROVED G DISAPPROVED ® ry 890327 Board of Weld Co. Commissioners April 13 1989 915 tO TH Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 To Whom It -May Concern, - This is a job description for the dining room and bar manager for D.B.P. Inc. (DBA) Peter Angelo's Restaurant. 1) Supervisor of the dining room operations and waitress'. 2) Supervisor of the service bar and the bartender. 3) Bookkeeper for the restaurant. 4) Cashier. Wages and compensation for the manager's position is $6.00 (six dollars) per hour. a id Pangelo Restaurant Own oti NoraRy Pvb) ;.....7, 1..? 3.'17 7 iv? 0 To Whom It May Concern, Feb. 23, 1989 As a former business client and a dear friend, I have known Terri Lawrence since 1975. During this friendship and business relationship, I have found Terri to be of unquestionable character and always honest throughout her business endeavors. Her unquestionable demeanor should with- out a doubt qualify her for anproval Cr the license application for which she seeks. If I can be of futher assistance , feel free to contact me at 678-0943. Sincerely, Christina Schultz in 820327 r • • To w of It May Concern, Feb. 23, 1989 have been an acquaintance of Teresa Lawrence for 2 years. To my knowledge throughout our acquaintance I have known Teresa to be honest and of unquestionable morale character. In my opinion she would be an excellent candidate for the license for whch she is appling. sincerel Mark Paulson a z 9 66),70/4 �d /3 p(4, 7t-te0/4, d s72) .5 3S 46 -e-76 7r wtr,�o P � e"S" S/ ,veS 4i t! Sill/A r", S �/�,AJ,J� �e 1 .v C /c/ /e CG /o DZ / 6 v'e 029 / 960 (peuve,e) 89032'7 To Whom It May Concern, Feb. 23, 1989 Throughout our 11 year acquaintance I have known Terri Lawrence to be of excellent character and unquestionable honesty. That honesty and sincerity was reflected during her tenure as a business woman of the Longmont community. To my knowledge her qualifications for the license for which she is appling are exceptable. Sincerely, n • Donna Sekich yoi /1/4&lf 6G °jc1 S55- -V9°1'2" 893327 • s To Whom It May Concern, Feb. 23, 1989 I have known Terri Lawrence since 198i . It is my personal opinion that her character and honesty are beyond reproach. As her employer I am confident that Terri 's exper- ience, knowledge, and ethical business standards will qualify her for approval of this application. S-incerely David Pietrangelo /sec i C1 na-r LtTYj,nit c cc- (CG 6° ? 314• 890327 .1 1. • DR 6401-1(1f9e) ID COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE UOUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by oath individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself constitutes evidence regarding the character end reputation of the applicant. 1. Nang of Business: UJHP lno.. (O(.. Oast Soar nun Number. "PrTff- R Aoe,c,Ln'S \c-stAu(,ac.S't n,1-??-79 i 2,2- 9,2- 2. You,Full Name:bar/fIrellfniddte_..„) 3. Also Known As: (Bean wrwnlciq, m•,eta) L2Lvre n o e 4.S.a.e.___ai n o o_ 1N,' e 4.)Mating Address: (It different from residents) Nome Telephone: y ..9.1S ...7.2/nQ 5.Residence Address: (street and number.city,aura,zip /67a 4)(2.R /1 &r-iv eD. 90.51in 6. Is your residence: 10!OWNED O RENTED I If rented,from whom? 7. Dan of Bret ry1� Place of Binh: ) / S. U.S.Citizen? .-1` /4—�/ I Levlgpnein e,nlorn-/n 'nS CND If nafutefled,state where. ' semen: NAM or us.Dien Court INaturalization Crodpe No.: I Date of Certificate: R n alien,give Men's ReoMfratcn Cad No.:Permanent Residence Card No.: e. weight Weight Hair Cad: Eye Color: Sex: Race: 10.Do you have a Colorado Diver's License? If yes;yes;give number. '5'9" /5/n °ror4fl 'PILL'? P Whitoi BYES ONO T 7I31nf 11. Whet Is your'elaflonsNp to the applicant?(sole owner,painter,wrporate officer,director.stockholder or manager): lan ia'- 12. If Stockholder,Numoev or Sn Beneficially or of Retard: I Percent of Outstanding Stock Owned: 13.If Parer.en when: I Percent or Partnership Beneficially Owned: 0 GENERAL 0 LIMITED 14.Name of Present Employer/: 5, of Business of Employment '1�n.Ii TS. Tt.arCt In I t tCFS7,41t1,41417 16.Address of Swine Where Employed:(r number,dry,stab,zip) Business Telephone: 4lrl /4 ai11y Irk Ley)& yc t Cfl, RO SOI ..]C - 4/4/74 y 17.Present Poston: I ,�y� tot nv tnel-R., rinnA 1 Insirrio '- i9.Marital Status: ((1� It Name of Spouse:(indude maiden nano if applicable) iron f•rfON I a...Rnn rietli S J (7,r,11`Ori('„D 20.Spouse's Date of Dirdto Spouses Place of Birth:IIIf C, Syra pse Meu ' rkt 21.Spouse's residence address,If afferent than yo%:(give ewer and number,My,sue,cep) 22.Spouse's Pr t Employer: pxupatlon: i _ NQw F,irr-rrtjn 23,Address of Spouse's Present @mployer: /4,ZM ilif7/ et/P _ (n Qn's/ln 24.List the mynahs)of all relative working In the liquor Industry,give their: Name of Relative: Releddehp w You: Position held: Name of Employe. lera9er.of Employer. A/nro . I I ICONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 890327 • • 25.Do you now. .00r(have you ewe held a direct or indirect interest in■Stem of Colorado U9uor or Bye Llonue7 If yes:sewer in detail. ❑ YES 2("D 26,Do you row,or have you ever had a dlrea or indirect merest in a liquor or beer license,or been employed In a liquor or beer related business outside of thei • Colorado? ryes,*describe In detail. ❑ YES l�lNO 27.Have you ever been convicted of a crime.fined.Imprisoned.plead on probation,received a suspended eentena or forfeited bail for any offense m alminal court?(Do not Include traffic violations,unless they resulted In suspension or revocation of your driver's license,or you were convicted of driving unbar the in of alcoholic beverages.) If yes;explain in detail, ❑ YES $NO 28. Haw you ever received a v aagan nobs.suspension or revocation for a liquor few violation,abeen denied a liquor or beer hoarse anywhere in the U.S.? If yes;explain/in decal. O YES N0429.Hew you ever held a gambling or gaming liana a arced s Federal Gambling Stamp? d Nee;explain In OEM below,❑YES ] (NO State/Federsl: Year: Ciy: State: StaterFederal: Year: Cty: State:30,Military Santa:(branch) From: To: I Serial No.: Type of DisdwOe:31.Ual M addresse►where you have INed for ten last five yews.(Attach aperw sheet d necessary) Street and Number Ciry.State.Zlp From: I To: 39H /-fray ll4 n�,. /Dd /rr» r,, & e61atada Ijco1 tb. 812 l 0741y v7 'peke 32.List all former employers or burntass engaged in width the last five yews.(Attach separate slats if necessary.) Name or employer:. Address:(beet,number,city,an.zip) f Position Held: From: To: fine .n+ no 5e o € io /5 amp-. �, ,.eh '(�D8�5f�1�'P�arfPrapr q-kin ! 149 • �" �osme'EOIo i t� a 7aO,4c,S.- e. l oo 4 S�QY'CYI nrnv,s PU mt, SfU9ol�y+s�ug, f IU- `SZ''S �9-`8 • 33.List the names and attach lean of recommendation from Owes persons who an vouch for your good dwsaer and fines in connection with this application. Name of reference: Address:(feet,number,dry,state,zip) No.of Years Known: 9 M / - S/6..oh)- 45&./ ABM; &J sal/i, .J ,sgAz._ /s6)/ i N n/ //ra z di n'%4.n eel.] $-/a?a?9 h !iPl arii4. 5n/ /5/(rsa 42_ OATH OF APPLICANT e I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments t thereto,and that all information therein is true,correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Singawre, nee: Date: alar(f01,20(0,',141 --- — 990327 S LEAVE BLANK he)OQ TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK FBI LEAVE LANK APPLICANT , LAST MANE NAM FIRST HAM! MIDDLE NAME \ I 7d r, - ?,CtgpN&Cto boAVED g SbVAT IFRSaEINyt RIB ICLIASES ANA R SO C00620000 890624627209 xCD �, HISIGENI_E. twsON ENGARNFINI ED = GREELEY CO J•EE EI•ln 0011 EITJCL RD D.. /58c/ I o y /7 31 LWI NGI\)AF•� I CI.T':f ENSNIF CT1 SE• NA E ETl1 A'X PLAIE VF RINiN POB Cu Faro IN4 W r o ,tar I,�,,,+ZAcG-E•O nu•'o DATE S .*FUREUF of ii.": NAING,NGEGER nn Iiulxn, OGA - LEAVE BLANK O;J`4vf •_ cNPLOi[v AN.AUU4f4 ft II N6 EHI CLASS `\, f 1 ANNED FORGESNe MNU J t v . I., '/ • ' T ' e A.JN..,NI ES c':nl lEP .. SOLI AL+ECUXfIT NO. SOC Nfv ,. A �F • a73- .267 1 wscf3L Ali IOU S NO. MNU a ----.---:,,t.," t,7dy, -pi/ rA „� �R5 ', ,YN ••'•k . .- 1 R T WEB }.. u.INOEA 1. N.MO0SEA R.RIn4 5. R.LITLLE ,r , r 7 OJ e '� e u 5. . . ‘,.. EL.THUS! /l/ ,r^-I'-I WINDEX I L.MIDDLE E,L,RING lo.. L.LITTLE V' G. 4-",-.7,-1,-- ' 4 frL L ' /i/rte h,i/„ T, �V ♦'5�( rt t \t? \��1 "" ,;•,,,r,,,...\.?„.,-,..,• ` ,;.rl off; 89032'7 LEFT POUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY E L.THYME I.THINE RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAIEN UMULTANIOUILY FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONIP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.G. 20537 1. LOOP APPLICANTNO RECORD �� 4�� I I CENTFP ' P / ' OF 1.001' TO PP;MN LAS.IMIAst E FINGERPRINTS ,■{/�', B. V Y/ W l AV A�\tai I `--_ • b4 n PH aS . q 1 F,S AAA ♦ \� •">D y .rI �\ \S Y DISTL pUTE INK EVENLY On INKING llnp. • /' VA�'V �A �.. HASH AND DRY F NOERS THOROUGHLY- ��`/'y,�' �-.Ep.�•F,Fpr CHECK ONLY 'I ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NA:'L, AND AYL.•V.iI�PN n•R`rTDM Lam!"�^� Ne'.�•• I HE ..RE,MC•aESS10N`.ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER. A _ ":F AM AMI'UTA ON CR DEFORMITY MA,.ES IT .MPOSS!RUE TO PRINT A RINLYv MAKE A NOTATION '7 THAT EFFEC IN THE INDIVIDUAL I1NOCN DLOCK --r im + DI I TA� • 11 SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MA ES IT IMPOSSIaLE 10 OBTAIN PERFCCT IMI', ESS1ONS,SUBMIT 'HE BEST THAI '..AN HE ODTAIN ED WITH A MEMO STAPLED 1.3 THE CARD FS.i'L AIMNG THE CIR_ {_„_,Y__ _ CU MST ANC E S. —..—_--___ E RAVINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IN 'HIT CAN BE CLASSIFIED, OEAKINC 'IN MIND THAT 'III I INF, HIT-WEIN COTE 14 OR MO•,T FroW.FR PRINTS FALL INTO THE PATT F FNS SHOWN ON TH.', CARD rDINER PATT I RN',OCCUR '1Ir AND nF LTA MLA SHOW iNrIEQUrN'LY AND ARE NOT SHOWN MERE'., 2. WHORL. THIS CARO FOR USE T3Y: LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK 1— A NF RCFMEN ..AEMC!FS NTT R: '. 'L AI -Li I ^ y�a ,- -T -.A1+1 ECU? AM I.Nf(-ROCNI-HT POST ��1C K // . / ',"0,(;:c'I DELTA rr C A S OF I'n F AND LOCAL yr r NF T ION F rR- _ / 11/HAT ' �I r.1 I M ICYME4 CFN 'N A t AS N TN R. �� 1 A AY i A ‘,� CJ o f TAT C AND APPROVE v TI.H ATTDHN v tat-- (44 • 1 I in RA Or INC UN,TED STATE'S COHA Al.'. nl N Y 0R 11 —i i_r 11NE LFS$,PECFCAI PAEJ RNAI ..FSAIF. _ �., L L NOT SAT F HISRgJPh t A c' , 1 . _• /. .OVER'MEN AGENCIES AND M•PP. II-IFS R. �T .Y eUIRf HTFEDERAL LAW' "- E r C�. - D� _ - �• •+'�' I. LI r ,r AO CIF rrnrvA LY CHAN f !1H INSJ FD•LAN,. _ .. l VN1 Tv HHHU E JN MAN AP, E„HIi! .. I . ..- ��.- .F THCSE INSrIIUT'',GNI, C - ._.. THESE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN I INSTRUCTIONS: FULL tAO MUST OE CLEAR PRINTS MUST FIF T CIE CHECKED F[1/4-CH THE APPRO. - - HRIATF- STATE IDENTIFICATION BUREAU. AND ONLY THOSE Wl i 3. ARCH %",NLFRPHIIITS FDR WHICH NO DISCLA.,E'VIND RECORD HAS Li. gFRN FOND LOCALLY IHGLLD $1 I;BRIT;ED FOR FDI L' • - AN t. �� 4 ZN- V I PRIVACY ACT CF /I P L 4T- 1? REQUIRES THAT BCD. 1 RAL STATE CH 1 CAL ADENC FINFORM INDIVIDUALS /-+� ' �i//�� A� .•>,.S. HOS OCIA SE.CD Y NUMBER I rr„.L'.TED WHETHER C C 75 '/�j 1/;;;;;C::,`„:\ \ ',RCN TI CLCIJHC I` MANDATORY OW Y I4iART BASIS OF z ` L� ':?//a'\\\�� AUTHORITY FOR SUCH C I TA,ION ANC. SFS WI 1 WILL I j144,e^��\ RE MADE CF T _ :OfY Y OF PR VA1L C UN1TlAC Gt 'MOULD It SIIQWN I /' i N SPACE "EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS". CLNTF•IMITGR S i I_• � , iHE NAME OF THE Ay 4CY ,URMI l Th: FI,3"e0RINT / , ///l_''��_��++++ - CARD TO THE FRI. - —j' C •II l .I EH yJ.,IjWOrN IF KNOWN, SHOULD AI WAYS FE FU7RNI SIIFG . �'" '` ,WF'4/,rte. MII CELL M1"'aV1i„�CS�„6 VACF- 6/� „V tioj 7 [' N SCE.ILANEOUS RECORD. OTHER ARMF 0 533 6,..64 a S DAs O�Fj (VP', ALIEN REGISTRATION I O. !A 1. PORT W. Ii��..yy��S SCAL .'J��1JJ Y"11MCN.� a$ SELECTIVE SFRS IC N_F.'(^t) vFTFR- ARCH[: f1n 1JV cw �yT _CnU FV3VVVV /N1.Ld WO{LJJ tSS„fI/1\1 1 AMk 114 CLAIM NO :VA FN JM REV I.I „ VN N -rv3 iG oove:o , .!S, ��y _ N Nl�N6 .,r.r l..e. yrI !.n .''"'w-�/W/1 • 890 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK - FBI LEAVE BLANK LAST SAME NAM FIRST SAM MIDDLE MANE APPUCA�FT i � '.nulrenet � riso- h 'np11-6,- SII;MAIUN�x A4M,N RM. D ALL1E5 AKA o C00620000 r/ K 30 89067458?504 �"` �Eb'l�.r lI L.rE 4E b�N)n DE 9?N GREEIEY CO M,nM De. ooPTAm �� //Q � co .-' CL l� 7 /.-.lf� -Ct/L/� f `s / Dsxl, CT! I N..E I I _er. I t�(.lJ . ,`']oiAE ro_o 1//_/ LNINULNNNINI5 4009 MrD OCA LEAVE BLANK /FMS YEN AND 4.IDRL11 D VP a.m.. „,.NJ Fill T .,, °05P22 a„ ` ncse r�S9aso� AVAIL) DMLL,NG MAU Opp .E. On 4.N9LIII ."" SUC'.AL TLL.J91TY N0. See .t` car, i l72 —Qt , 4 ' 11 Q. a.r&.&c ( M 5CELL.NED115 MO. MNu \ fi-s',F ATP. 1•.t if P/4 t.e) do Pi- ii ao el • I, N TNUMN ). M.INDEX 1. R.MIDDLE l R.RING 5. R.LITTLE ,' r° ,ii ec f3 /� N. L. Ma rND F. L.INDEX e. L.r u oo 9.L.MAD lD LITTLE L /51l1,� Ye , I L cs • •;N- 890327 LEFT IOUM FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY L.twin R.THUMB PONY FOUR PAGERS UFO SYMILTMICOUSLY FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537 I. LOOP APPLICANT r LY N � I i LLN Y'Lf / \\NC or 0 OP i MN CLA dF ABLE I INOE.RPRIN'S // L�� c',,.:�� —�_�____ � 1 "..',,;;, \`\ 'lY H,ACAP SNIP iNf. D S1 RI BUT[ NA FVCNLY ON INK NO SLAG. \� �S ��A .y �. RASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY, 4% 5S\ \' ��, ' 1 ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NA 1_, AND AVOID.ALLOWINO FINGERS TO SLIP. ! -1„- LIRE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECOPDID IH CORRECT ORDER. o ':F AN AMPUTATION OR OEFORNI'Y MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MARL A NOTATION TO THAT LF°ECT m THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK. '1 • I semt PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIOLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIIONS.SUBMIT i'41 BEST THAT (:.N Al OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAIN:No THE CIR. I CUMSTANCES, EXAM NE THE CCMPLETFD PFIN 0 ;EE IF THEY CAN III C ASSI RED, NEAP NG IN MIND THAT THI I Ilsdru II'TWFLN CENT FR OF MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO :Er PATTERNS SHOWN ON TH S CARD .O H R PAT'ERNS OCCUR 11( P AND DI I.TA MUST SHOW I INFREQUENTLY ANO ARC NOT SHOWN HERE. J 2. WHORL THIS CARD FOR USE BY: LEAVE TNIS SPACE BLANK 1 I f��f]. 'SrtY N1. PAW F N Fu( / II: I N FIN,I"PkINtN S APP.I. ! ^-y ��'; r AMY FOR A f. F. L M o f SITI is' DI IA ly 14 Cfl AL-.0,- .T ANO D Al GCYC4 N S CR 4 /ATE /// /� 1P l�� S`: F' E EL Mf CFI INCA FRMIT AS ALIH R 7��t l I, p 4 S S I Sy A F YL APPREV C R E Y - / SSI DIRA: 1 Tyr ,,N,TED SIA FS. :or I.Tv GRID I', J;4 \Y '' NA4rt I NL P'C I ICAt I Y EASED Y A0 F A F PST _ / A' FU TA Cl I ro NI • <IJ♦ � ..."-'"Om...,....21E,"lL C,,. �� I. l .0 FCVEPNMF ACFNtIF. AVE M R ENT N, NE ERI, CUIRE L FEDERAL LAM' �f .c 4. CFEI Al ALLY CHAR r 0 IAN,- F ;UP 40 1 S 5 11 MDIF OE Mn n nm FCCR Or 'NOSE INSTITUTION' THIS( LINES RUNNING t+CiwL[N INSTRUCTIONS: P i, p r ma..., DI I A. MUST OF CLEAR •I PPP,., mu,T F.R.. r.1 CIIFCAF, N_l. 1HE n . wA' G 9AVAT.DD ..t .'I1 t 'PATE ',TATE PIN F CAI u DUp A L ith'D2N1 T 1N05t. r�� 3. ARCH i1;5F4 RI T a C I N EESUI n I4 Y RFCGRD NA% An _. - FIN 1O.,NJ ,MALI 5 JLD tr 141 LI.T EON 18, NY r, 'ArJ i• CARL', 1 A��/lY��{�•,I 1^�F/F f• 1.P �(}yw,/yE�' 1•SE. Y�/ Y '1 \M ! ' FN♦,�1eCY A. T OF 1/] P L 11.5 IRE TI ZASZD Vhl k EC I EYV'1 C,ILY ::�� V S R' I�.- y,l RAir, ATE OR LOCAL ACENCIE NELN I'LIVI JAL 1 //� S ��. ‘...,:\r\} V MHLSF SG OAT F(UNI Y N0 BER S J FS :D H H 1. ��// IT \\ A�� 'r ' I. 1 SUER O IO VHF IS ANDATORY OR V(L TAR.. PASS OF f ' • Ef�-��V AA AUTHORITY POR UCH JLI fiATIOH A D L F -,HCN ILL 1 i��/�� _ MADA TOf TE �/ '� 1 PERT Y „F YCR PRIVATE CONTRA[ OR 0 iD H OWN - Aly T` IN :PA L EMPL DYE N AND N NTN HUT 4 A -•1 .11E 4A Or THE AGENCY SUTAJHMI'T NI, Th. FIAIk RNl ` e -y. ^ _AND C THE FBI. 'ti -`V '� 3c/�_ - l •F I 1 ( yNE, BFR IF 040 , .Y.ULD A A , BF F R 5 FC. ETN `N. NM,► .1� //,l/l. I "(�I,Y U�1 d ,e7IATF',PALE. "'_+- __•.•.,,_ '-Pr O k \/. 41SCELLANFIViU.. NO RECORD- OTHER APRIL: FORCES NO --`^A1.� N/'I ,L I. F•A)W NT PPP, AL EH RFGISTRA DN NO (AID, PORT SE &�eA h* ACe ARCHES HAVE NO 0ELTAS . n'R,u a yMy�!Mp�rvM NO. BPS ELECTIVE SFKVI 1 NG.TO VIlER ,,'SAP r't F�Nilly I�C•V LIMTICN CLA NNE.IPA. f_C� o. 0 q it2 •kfY-1-1,11. '�J Q V do.- 0O 'I/rl ;( U,? .OOVFUHNGN,-PNIhY1RG O,iICP.- In,3 ,_IA: \�Or J r _ LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK FBI LEAVE BLANK X0,1? LAST MANE NAM Pint xwE DOLFNAME APPLICANT r f -:-% q,jecc0, &IYN6 E , M AT EOFRERSONFoot. 4., '1 n ALIASES AMA O 000620000 M.,.. ..., / RQ S4r try 890624627307 EFfii('LE OF E W N MGEFYMInTEO , 1 W• .,.. 7 ,._ f GREECE 1 co U•,E 4E air. DOBD.! /38O/ 6/` o. c at ;vlr... ., .. .....J., �� \ a3 ow d{/ CIT¢EMSMI! CTZ MACE MG!, NGL Eames �AIIF Yui(0FBIBIM pOB N6-04-13)Ad 7 eaio . '°J I I I F. W I 5!.J I ISO 164PI I DM/)I7JL1/ ~ �NEO EWE N4NA.YNIOF OFFi CIAI NPNINTS uKMO, OCA ' LEAVE BLANK 'Pr • f EN.LOYEN AND ADnNes I F INO. 1r,'-_ �'•"`�� AS - C.ASS ,,TOFFEE,FORCES NO. mPV REF. REASON F'.NoENNNIN'EO SOCIAL SECURITY MO. 500 a93 -38 9269 .—244'67/-, b:C -, MISc.LLANE0w N0. mNV ifi;, ,4\...S x., .-, ,_: ,„r..n.M' : • • 1 R.'MUMF 2. P 1. P.nDOIE A,n,AING - 5 A LPITLf .,J p ' � L �rI 4: I rtSF e 174X':3f .." Y,. M. 11, r A L.YMVM! _. z yi L. L.MmOLE n.L.PING , 4;0/1/LITTLE - �,A +i r'L';TR° ; /3453.13%a#:1", - . 890327 • • LEIT POUR?MOM YAIIEN MMVLTAMIOOILT 1,TMOMI R.TRIMS PIGMY POUR PINCERS TAKEN 9WILIAMEOUSLY FEDEXAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED1'ATES DEPARTMENT OFSSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537 i LOOP APPLICANT As NO RECO�D 7., . /_,_.... \>„, ,r;,,,,-;;---,.-,1,,,,,,, ,\ \‘; --rrNTE, r 6- t�I , F LOOP F IN;YRiN LLASSIFlABLF FwGFRPw n• ISA v ��' - - nrA ru1N ��`C11 • i •r \t� V�A . Y. J1;14113;171 INK [VEN.Y N INR NC.SLAF AM 1 RASH AND DRY E NGFR. ON QFJ CHECK ONLY t\ ' \\^. I. I.DL_ FINGERS FUVM NAIL TO SAls AND AVOID ALLOWING FIRIGCRS TOiLIP. Re YU NE IMPRFS OW;AwE RECOFDED LN co Ec' nRDER. r \N AM'DTATI N rN DI-FONMITY MAKf`, I'I M OSSINI_e ?O I'RIN: A r1NC,Ei1 MAw:I A Mr-nr':ON O HAT ye'(Cr or N[ .NDI.VL.UAL NN';III, K. Ml •'I A'._ CON) 1,011 mar' I. soF.... . _ 1 'I N I'rrtf Fc ;RP- '...0N, • I!jM.. 's L F., ..'NA' .v .> OIITA M1L". R Try 4 M l TA^,.., 'D !NC CA ID LYOLA".NN, •N C L_. .. _ CIIMSTANCFS. r AY NI- .bL LI.. FO I' E s Hi CAN r'( CLA.',,FI ED RI AY nG IN m NL,THAI 11 INI ` 1 WflY IN"( i OF •1rV51 Li; , A MIRY; ' OW : M f FNI`1 4A.L.M1 M A:T II J'N.Y _� lii :.AMD : 11 Hln 'A iT C.. - ��.vn v r -• • Ih i [!J.Fry L'I AND AHC NOT MDR.rl.w;. V` Of T'4'S CARD cOR USE 3Y :EMI'THIS SIA° 4i4ANX d w� .•• l\ �\l_ FNM I 4 IN ! . AI't':'. NISI NYIN NI FN '. !NS RUCTIONS Iii ; I �✓�/ �/a9—'/ .1- _/.1/ � )I LTA', VI !.l _FAE _ _.__ __'__ _.__ �,.n n [fN AS 1l A AND OM1 HOSE 3 ARC!, tier N'S FOP dFsIs DI.) A NO RECORD HAS J. /' r'N I si"O. UCA.,1 t It TFD rOV FBI I n AC F i. 14F\ I IA A. �� u I bAL .IAl CS ,( AL A LAN[IS NF FM INO VIDUAS. �7// VA Y '. Gt t t F V J P H RF JESTED AHETHER /��/ / *1 S' ' - SUCH D J r• I', A l A H O Ar L AHY BASIS OF / /�� N\>\� ':.-� AJTHC IOR Su[ -.sir ATD AND ISES w ICn WILL 47411".:‘ ,-..°v* tlf MA F Cr v /�� .T 1 OF RN VA F )M1:NA GY SHOULD ! Y , /� ` Y SHA F (MOLO.;1 A l DRL i WTM !•,_�I h II!F IAMI F :I.I. A .Mr• r +,�:•' nr�'hC14 I r I lhl N N )J l.w �x_SFF A'FD C' f FRI `• —q[ �.% r I NrmilFC F ,NL`++ISI'01'6J P F� IF I WO('F, . >�/1//1,�4• N.,/ H AI PROM:A"• rim' i Co C:.•Y b 1��7 r. ((��1 6°y! }}ffu1, 2 1 O� Q A Ut N] I RD DI fR ANM fSFCc rSA4.. I O, V 1./J . A. T / A SVL1 IPi`) d FN NFLISTNAT ON Na AV! r'OH71f. l Af X1/15 .lVI A 11rlu+{, r�y�y)4i. /'CNN IVRA�,WF1VICE NO MI M YEET F'. ^ y.../ �) J I ANS•ADHIN 5 lh ,ini LLFAI Gdoin1 ',YVI1 ,j,lib z,,/t I `...4.4.22 / rJ.r FIN 1.'IS U.S. C.0V_ Nm EN r !v TINu. ,,.E P. !,/, . ...I...! 1 Jd ~,t^'1111'� `/\",N��^F /!��/yy 413 '• • vx {%r/) . r I P 949 231 410 �e'C/-G! 1er?ffneinr Q, — - RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL , np• Coffma * Items 1 n4 2 whin eddItIonsi ser lees w desired, end complete RMrte ro AS.eancE core xr,¢PR-Noto Rai your _' eke.fNure 4o do tlRk add ptMnt W{ r F,a n cRr a,once Mt! • card from resumed nsdMyEo �TO"rS�>f»!Clm(tlw pgyy� y��►y �pr� �} tSet R'ves __ _ _. . c�ya yi� I �1Qedt Fa . MO�Mnf vir ivaybTe.COM#t ladrtwfsr 1.ot tew v . dypulq_ }iOt atddate an G teed+eddre DBP, INC. 1. L]]] Shove to whom d wilts.end a• emd. 2. O RestrktW Delivery S Mons thane) i PETER ANGELA'S RESTAURANT 3. Ankle Addressed to: 4. `xn,Eeyt� , I 4322 HIGHWAY 66 �/2 9 LONGMONT, CO 80501 1 DBP, INC. Typo SeMos. I PETER ANGELO'S RESTAURANT L! Insured i 4322 HIGHWAY 66 ed Q �p� C�nn.aec.r j LONGMONT, CO 80501 - ----- Ahlteye Meer*Peters or eddrNeM rt¢ml 0rn„r r y F re I 04 pent and DATE Da NERW. _ t ` 1: Signature 1/4--Address G. Addressee's Address(ONLY♦ . S r.zs:nt ted Der*,ry Fee Toward and felt poW) —. __.____. —.__ X _ RrOdn I,cc -isti:+H�n.3- Dd POe)� co Lt w� ei t,,,v fw f Fj pt t *Vs ,Receipt snow :0. o a,nom.• Da'e a J M1Yess of Con.,c, 7. Oats od pointy 0 1_ Z I OtA �ost.ry,a,.T Fees S4111 PS Form 3811,Mu. I968 • utaP.o. se l-212-tea DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT j 8 o d , 1 el LL N a M W V I, I - , i I „ I I I i i I 1 RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance to the County Attorney' s Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance are O.F.T. Incorporated; Jose G. and Marie Cabrera; and Donfilo Lomela, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against O.F.T. Incorporated; Jose G. and Marie Cabrera; and Donfilo Lomela to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. / 890384 Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of May, A.D. , 1989 . r/ C 7 heLe^" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY,., COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder , y - and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, C irman RY: a;•; e e J.h son, Pro-Tem pepaty County Clerk 1 '/ frent"e APPROJGED AS TO FORM: � . Bran George Ken 7„.„ County Attorney - Got = ." *,act 890384 ■ • fst MEMORR 1DUM Tr Board of County Commissioners Dete May 1, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services subject Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1063 O.F.T. Incorporated Box 606 Boulder, CO 80530 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal actior against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 890384 Acif(7‘; mEmORAnDU 1111€ 10._Board of County Commissioners Div May 1, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services soptcr Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1048 BCV-1048 Jose C. & Marie Cabrera Donfilo Lomela 5310 South Nelson 12672 Weld County Road 6 Littleton, CO 80127 Space 320 Brighton, CO 80601 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 890384 _.^ /�\ �=\ter/\\� /\� / :,..1.:•,, �� / _ ' ,�i f� /I J,I , �'ya T"''1 ,dji7J °:. �.�} r' •` 1 'yJ !"Y-i r'a .,^ 1 a J�14's '+• T a , - 4 xrrQ:tQ \/\ ♦ m+`," V JJ;,'i ;4 `1 `t` iiir a 1 s,,y,.,��t. v. ffL^ {.yh,a,j 3'\ -4. ,q�y1 4 iMi '4 to s' r .41 kfi�< p + -. 3 )1 \, P 144t rr :,'�\� /, , e-- "` '1. r;), ,, ,,),,-,-,,----:-- r1 4.a 5` y/J,-'7 , . ��ta/ 'ff, lei / '✓•�• 3? �a .� tC' /�4 �) 1 I I{lllrllilr(f( r i� / t � Z��;� e �fy� \.� � �`�o- �p�� •' j � � �f:-_,,,,,-.:1--_---1-‘' �C:��.��. � 4 5''jr�si'�^ (� � (';•I I (� � I ) 111 ''. cr( �, '' ��` �� '�� 1 a � >s' (.,,3p 6 G •1 --. At. ✓ (� 1 tti, �.c 11 1 r�,T 1 1 (i.) r `�. �" \ C � i� .,� - I` '�' - � )1 7i 'Ir, r r J 1 t 1 ' t, .-.�{ J -' 1 � s' � ' 'f1� Il� r c! fir I R t Q�I ) (l !I' � ��1 nG tir/ 11�rl r 111 I Itfll ' il 'rlll t ) d 1 il( ( eat___Ai: dtre , ''''(,.rg ',il ph iiv e _ -- =f,�\�__ _ _.�r -,� `'l,. ,l�f r — _ _ i ..h.- ah. I; 11\1\I -1\t�111'11)1 �)II,,��lli)1 W — tI!.��,. I - ('r „111 tea..{'. `:-..::14;"111:e1::::::‘ .. ' 11�� 1�� )�t, r r1 r „ � kI 11 �) rI� I 1 �Ii1(' r - lil' ��Sj��• � ICI ltlll � P1�lT1 1 J ' r / �1 r Jn I r I I Ji <, r , � 1 " ICI' l r \ s \' II' WHEREAS, 'Donald' E King has served the Weld County ,Road,and Bridge Department for the 'sr �j 1pas , twnty-f ourYeas,' ans '� n' ,((I' : tI , . , �WHEREAS,1the 'Board of1Weld County Commissioners wishes to recognize Donald E. King for ',.4. , z _ . his many years ,of dedicated service to Weld County. . ; ` PNOW,? THEREFORE, LET. IT BE KNOWN,' that the ,Board of Weld County Commissioners wishes to a . ) ` `r- , express its gratitude to Donald E. King for his outstanding dedication to Weld County and v �`�� Y�G its citizens ' � , �r;, ‘� CjjS _ tom ? a�.f ` , j1` ' C. W. Kirby,:Chairman Q% j % I t ` s JJJ��., � r �b / ) ‘i %,i J c u ine il nson ti E. Lacy& s t��, w: r l` air ' Gene R. ntn , .- - . , George Kennedy / •'# � � '' C / i e. _ ` ATTEST: <;L l�•lJ ? t `` 2 'I ,)''I‘ ' i1 4 N. I T 4v (/ r -IN Weld Cou t/ Clerk Recorder' - r d .,1` r f r y 7 e., .-. • • r r-r-"rig"' -- 4^ ^.^' a/� i w! Sts.!' t6•SF,• ti�`y�Y't 's"a^ 4 �,t.^.,t`^a ^r^t` tNrw a 4 . .w.�h,•*.y„�^r^ ls^w�r^ I Y a"' s-r r-r•r x ^v r r s t^,h^i � c r^r^e^r^r r"a r itl s-rr,..*S ' e ezta an r*re, 1 1 e8k=s'? i�s�lSf1P t^r�ri Kct >d.,C,4.,I'^T'f'y^r%r's'� 1 e}' .mss a twb`.,r�we t Y' '^4r`^ ta.:^Y�h�t^ to , _• 1 t�.t+i-1t�r ✓r`r-r'y'r*. Y-r a^r�s'�r': t r^r^'. r ,� I� r^' S r r^r".r'•r"r�x r^. r''.,•1 .^rt•�t'•r".^ r •-� .-� mss!^.t"'s.!�'�y1,K',t"s u'�n'^t^t'"'^. .^r'�mss^ �Y�t^^�''^J"s^r^LL^'^w •xr^'�t'^'1 r^'�s •'ti'•"r�t'^F' t^t'�Y^:r s^r^�`^.^t`^s .�^N''+t , �r40, .4rb J •''th2t .-a' A, � .' 4 �e i k-t •�i..w. + 'Ct2:2 `ws�' er'A C n'�+ rf,Nyy:: ++,a r *Sr' Li ' nyr,. t,4.e. "; ',., .^'twr'v^4'A t^14rF^Y'�h yy4s'41 a 'h ^s^sA r4 ." y.^,r4rn' t'+r4e4r4:^t- A, rl'r4r4 yip tip'. �rA^r4+ ,C", ,C''l'!"^Y ^v •rerV1 t rt. t s e.evat r r -'*'t` r''aslo t I 1"r^Y4rt' 4 _ -7, ?aPeit 44.-0+rlaesa404%,•8e4a '' .i 0 iV}Ddf+�OGY'tON• } let. — V'a91"+t'++'4 fPStaa �4,r F,a� �te : ,, ,a,jr St ti 's/},4 1a, r t� • _ y4.5-4-4.-.-{�+ asY�, ,. Y )p � tt< y OF � � J IN,. � n � i` LrR--1.-Prj� i%Y t Vii: c� ri�� , Tfp.1 rN �)x 3. � .C �Rl a,7r\j' 1 :j �I1. n1I-If",- ' !G!.°,Ijtt.3 �1 lc-Arty` rk- -''1(✓ . • I i'j •- . ,.. �r�l, ". ---- !• w, Vi III. f. JTJ 1'i � \i '-h''�. • • . F''"rod' _ s„ • • Y r:. 890389 "r-r Acp[a50! ��-��1_/\_ . - `_/ _/� / ,e�l,' ( :• ~ ."r Whit:, :. ..et - s. i .�- `�yA xn • f -, �i.dil\e., ^cs 'k � i` ,orivi r ['`w:: �,, i. I--.- Asa., , i.P,k�"-.: -„:,-)p.:6 *-,:ii..‘, I,•,,--,:44-, Yr'r o 'L s 1``/�S. , 4.„ y$'•, ,9 .E :ti_ J , a.`1I r y�r �i V:.7 y\ .... r"r a, n S aryl . a u� €."K r '; rya ; ))) Ga th J v , 1 )l() )r P)1 if _`eL..._ t,^' 1 / �I 4y!> ,^ 5` {'Sy }s f.\,_ � •c� ' st. ?, / () , 'i\ \1 '`'I11)� r ' 11`( (' I1i1 ) ^)\ ectJs iI, 1.s:? el : .:*4-,' � + - r •,52 -., yi l ,, ti ) f. ., l �; (f l / I f X14 4� L� v- -' _ �—'e((. 1 \ ), ) i, 1 )lr , �Ijll 111 . , ,�> , a >r� \ 1'C4> i I 1 II I t.� r l?l t1(1 __ _ " 1 • ( Ic ) 11 ( • - 1, t I • II t �l I l I^ r ( rt {f ( (I ',) II .` III1� I 1f� � (� I ��t') rl� l �� it � 1Il1l)it 1r 1 t I .2-Pe. 1 1 � a• 1� l )I 1l ) )I ,•�1 = 1 - `T® �. kit �L£ a �!r --!� _9 _Mr-- - ,' = :71:7-_-= _ _ - - _ - - ! • to l' L.,..41:1 PI, :-------- _ -_-=—___- _ = ittL OSiHi88R0— _ ------- ---=— - "I ,s,Xr. 11 n•111ru \ ,1l1L\ ,/1'\ 1I t If( nI r, I - 1 • ) ) .i...--,L 1 lII1111\Ill � �lll 'l ll�``\`nilifl 1 �. � n1� ilr; }I1 1Il, J� . .-f, '�"II__ '^t 3,ir,a ) ��`;I WHEREAS, I AN,`R S NBERG I{SAS,S£R,VED THE WELD I COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE r DEPARTMENT I FOR''THE r '�w.� t tli PAST_�EN YEARS• D'I+q�� ,l�"?lt(�lll ial'i , '1' t nlli 1r. --ht \�:t w `: II 1S1 '.? �(,,Y., III, i1h))n 4' •`4•Nli/ ' f r , '1 r (1/j flu/ :1,� .;Il .• irl 1 11 . )"...,t)t) ,1 -, '',--i :.-,:-\\;::, WHEREAS,VTHE)BOARD OF )WELD :COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WISHES TO RECOGNIZE IVAN ROSENBERG FOR j' � }y ,_ I-R •, " , HIS-MANY YEARS IOF DEDICATED,SERVICE •TO WELD COUNTY. r`..:; I; 1 r, ' • ' *—° a " 4 '` NOW, THEREFOR£, LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE BOARD OF WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.WISHES TO •` .' ''' EXPRESS ITS' GRATITUDE TO IVAN ROSENBEERRG FO HIS �OUTSTANDING DEDICATION TO WELD COUNTY AND • ma y (/.. ..."--_44,--i' ITS CITIZENS. : I G, • if ,��"'r'^'" r ' l,'�il‘.;:\ �1 -A ti ,; 1 x � ' KIRBY, CHAIRMAN '�riS .,> ,l�t i t l A,3� , .T;:; j ` `1 J C INE J T: SON, PRO TEM ,- --4--f-'; ' �1t, .F 9rrjl �RJ � � b thel'� GENE R = GEORGE KENNEDY « `� 't ` (1-%••:' f r� ° 1 ATTEST ,,..,- ,]`� +�. x�";'. \ •. ))) � d _ WELD COU Y ' • s \c .. 1.-4-54--4-..-: .j. • x- i ≥Y 4'1 :s��\`x ie'i" r"'s^.R4-i • i ^i^:`^t^i^a�'Y`^i'A. w�^.:i^Y^Y^y frs^FWaAi^�s, �rMv^�A„at Y i S' A>t s'+s^a'ik*i^aat,,^^a zsa)^s'^:•t ' 'r^s+t a44 ^' _� s^."^r^s^o^.^a Ps�P""` ^.+�r^r^s^�F1'bMAJ�FS t^s^P. ,c oi` ,- :a'^trV^."`Y'^r^r^s^'s^M.w^AF a^Ws•r°^e N^:,'v'^s^s^. 1 `s^e' F.a••••ei^a•••eg.^Y'.�^,s''.-rre•-• r�r:^+`1•'As'1'"'"'� 'F% ar r > - a ^e>,° '4- :i.2:: r^.^.^w'.',^�,^.^.".w••e�r'�r^,�^v,^' - � ./ .1^'a^,,,v ;.^iYr�'�t^ r^Ar sNe•-•••r`•a^�40•e eri:e%tC — • - ( ! ,.. t^S^ .'$.a t''1-. "er.s'.'4^r'Y' ee ,�^e' -'r r�lY a.". .ti..^ w.w e .^• ^ ✓, Jj+C.��/ -tY^^.^�•^^j`^N'any'''s^r'^'tiC Yt^.r^h '-'es`tt^•t.'�>eti. s``aat"" s: (A ' ,jnyr^.wi.C ti^::: •••.tra..,^!'�.^" r ^ ^.^t^r'+.)41.- `'' 't t'r ?.• , ?at.: �`^r '^ ^u^'l^y"e^.e r"N^an^r^r^•..y..y1 e^r . r. L� _ /� r{ ww ..^ .ti r- a- a-�r^rfMtreiNa .^r^r^ 4M s^r^.+^ .^y^r1r^.s ^,`'. -e&' se s^ 's r'.+.e t e e y.,�,� a t �� ,�� nyw •�v�.atvaow� a+rse.,•.otw^.•s+�.• +ci ,. / +�1X1�t�1 ��Y�131" "s'' � . �. •z sits .� �, `7 �.��,y� x x `�wI^4 ta� k. 4,,,,,..-c-x...�{{{ y t Z s _ ��- s I'.% utw R` j-Jr- s'�b 'c',✓ (/ ' ---%- -,..,..-, t s ¢'� - f / 'S.I yA r v. ' A t 3. r r i� E r ,. '� l�j� �\ K't ! $""fig t< .a.,J 43 €1� t - 6� (a ;pit.. - i,f� �� R i ..• ^� i �1`^- V .gt /�iXtA`„r1_,',Ye-t ,.t�a.: ,, ;. r- 4 ks>r• F. ,� - r .-, '• 4"�C da^27N ��1:� .v_•-!,N • .-.t s--`�.��:._ 2, . "". v `ci s • \'"'�., 890390 / C.'-')4.5' SEMI-MONTHLY PAYROLL • HANDWRITE APPROVAL FORM WARRANT WARRANT NUMBER PAYEE AMOUNT 114288 I DOLORES M SIFUENTEZ 173.51 I 114290 GERALDINE CORONADO 14.71 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I . I I i I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I \1Th2E3 OF WARRANTS 2 TOTAL188.22 I E? AMOUNT OF THESE HANDWRITES WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE SEMI-MONTHLY PAYROLL TOTAL ON MAY 3, 19 89 . WELD COuNIY , COLORAD , A,), I PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS - WARRANT P.O. & NO. VO. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14291 082782 HARTFORD LIFE INS. CO. 12,2 8.,2 14292 082783 THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP 1,076.16 14293 082786 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RTMT ASN-STATE DIVISION 817.24 14294 082787 J PAT GREGORY & ASSOC., INC. 1,302.95 14295 082788 PEAK HEALTH PLAN b,458.7J. 14296 082789 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RTMT ASN-MUNICIPAL DIVISION 14,451.82 14297 ( 082790 UNITED WAY /D0.70 14298 082792 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE 7,241.22 State of Colorado ) TOTAL ) ss County of Weld ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated jay 3rd , 1929 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ . Dated this 3rd day of MAY , 1989 . G;etd e Pricer Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of MAY , 193 9 My commision expires: fl. s, _ ._. . _ s gia"-.4,, a. ..{, __.-, iry Public ,.( State of Colorado ) ) ss County of Weld ) _ We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL Fund totaling S . Chairperson . ems,��► Ait ;77EST: Ne : •er .,..nty C",eek and Recorder Member u `Lep Me,T,berr\ w ".wa . . J WELD COUNTY , COLORAD r "" 9 PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS WARRANT P.O. & NO. VO. NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT 14299 082796 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT 200.00 14300 082797 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT • 60.00 14301 082798 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT 245.00 14302 082799 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT 175.00 14303 082800 CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT £60.00 14304 082801 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 658.07 14305 082801 WELD COUNTY COURT 1,i V.U4 14306 082804 CLERK OF THE COUNTY COURT LARMI ER COUNTY 245.57 State of Colorado ) TOTAL ss County of Weld ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through 3 and dated MAY 3rd , 198_9 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ . Dated this 3rd day of NAY , t3 9.ixity, Weld C unty Fi4ia ice officer Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of NAY , 103 9 My corm ii Si on expires: My Commission Explres June 8, 1990 . Notary- Public State of Colorado ) ) ss County of Weld ) We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL Fund totaling S . Chairperson- ‘. \ - Mem, e 44 -_`ST �, Member y, � � /4 ;: . Ai- ...,nzy Clem and Recorder Member :' ��J �� i l �. ,cam .: // rte-- - e --puw � Member PL � �j' WELD COUNTY, COLORAD thW, PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS WARRANT P.O. & NO. VO. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14307 083639 WELD COUNTY REtLVING FUND 192.53 y l SMALL PAYROLL (67 cks) 11,031.53 State of Colorado ) TOTAL 57,721.14 ) ss County of Weld ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through 3 and dated ?M 3rd , 198 9 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 57,721.14 . Dated this 3rd day of mAY , 19 9 V/ Weld Coy iota e Officer Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of YAY ; 1939 My c0mmi S i an expires : My Commi.sdnn r.„0. 3 +v 1 q 7.4 Notary Publid State cf Colorado ) ) ss County of Weld ) We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL Fund totaling S 57,721.14 . Chairperson./.-4-t Me. COY'' ember ;.,r,cy C14k and Recorder lemoer L .c-_ i , tip, aJ ;. � Oepu y Membe4� I' - . or " l PAY104P MEDIA REPORT PAGE 1 ['lin RUk DATE: OS/02/89 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 04/30/89 .t,_. . RUN TIME: 07:47:26 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO • EMPLOYEE MAME JOU NAME WAGES O Alltml • ALANIZ, PAULINE LABORERS N.D. 268.00 '! 0 ALVAREZ, .TILLIE LABORERS M.D. 234.50 + AMENT, KATHERINE L LABORERS N.D. 30.15 ARISPE, EMMA YOUTH/LABORER ND 2.15274 i AVILA, JOSEPHINE LABORERS W.D. 268.00 * k11 BRADLEY , MARK LABORERS W.O . 26.80 II BUSHA1 BRENOA M LABORERS W.D. 23b.18 BYRNE, GLENDA L LABORERS W.D. 264.65 • CERVANTES, CHRISTINE N YOUTH/LABORER MO 110.55 CHAIREZ, ANNA LABORERS N.D. 237.01 • CHAUVEAU, UERONIQUE H LABORERS N.0. 204.35 _ CHAVEZ, TAMMY L YOUTH/LABORER NO 160 .60 . . . 1 • CHRISTIAN, MARJORY L LABORERS M.D . 53.60 • CHRISTMAN, GAIL R LABORERS W.O . 267 .16 . , CLUBB, DANA G LABORERS M.O. 184.25 CORONADO, GERALDINE LABORERS W.O. 173.36 ve ..I DE HERRCRA, NANCY J LABORERS N.U. 58.63 O DELACRUZ, CAROLINE YOUTH/LABORER MO 190.95 ESTRADA, 0£TTY M LABORERS W.O. 268.00 GARCIA, BARBARA J LABORERS W.D. 56.95 0 GARCIA, MARIA A LABORERS N.D. 254 .60 GARZA, MARTINA LABORERS M.D. 70.15 GRAFEL, LYNNETTE V LABORERS N.D. 268.00 _.,. 1i • 1 CRANIUMS' CAROLINE LABORERS N.D. 187260 0 GRIFFIN, MARGARET L LABORERS N.D. 241.20 0 GROVES, CASSANDRA M YOUTH/LABORER w0 212.73 GUTIERREZ, ANGELINA U LABORERS N.D. 179.23 HALSEY, APRIL L YOUTH/LABORER WD 110.55IIII ,. HANILTION, ANDREA M YOUTH/LABORER ND 188.44 ` e+ HERNANDEZ, MARTHA LABORERS W.D. 214.40 MUFF, PAMELA J LABORERS W.D. 268.00 AIL IBARRA, LINDA LABORERS N. D. 30. 15 JONES, LINDA LABORERS W.D. 56.95 • JORDAN, VICKI S LABORERS N.D. 164.15 GI KANATAS, BERTHA LABORERS N.D. 267.16 KOCER, NOLENE J LABORERS W.D. 121.44 + � � � • LANGLEY, GREGG LABORERS W.D . 6.70 • LOERA, HERMELINDA LABORERS W.O. 268.00 • LOPEZ, JOHN LABORERS W•G. 30.15 • LUJAN, NANNETTE M LABORERS N. 0. 33.50 Ij MAES, DONNA MIGRANT TEACHER AIDE 47.76 MAGALLANES, IRMA LABORERS W.O. 268.00 0 MALDONADO, MARIA I LABORERS W.Q . 241 .20 MARQUEZ, JENA' S YOUTH/LABORER MD 110.55 RATA, LYNDA LABORERS M.D. 180.90 ID MC CREERY, BOB LABORERS N.D. 13.40 ID MEDINA" DOLORES A LABORERS N.D. 214.40 • MEISNER, KRISTY M LABORERS M.O . 268.00 • • ID 4I - - - __ _ •(- llt PAYI04P MEDIA REPORT PAGE 2 H ' I RUN DATE: 05/02/89 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 04/30/89 IIP RUN TIME : 07:47: 26 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO • EMPLOYEE NAME JOB NAME WAGES :1 • 11.'. --- ---- MIER, FRANCINA M LABORERS M.B. 3.35 MOHCAOO . BEVERLY LABORERS M.D. 162.48 MONTIJOI, JENNIFER R LABORERS M.D. 244.55 MORENO, JUANITA LABORERS M.D. 253.76 41 NIETO. LEONOR LABORERS M.D. 241 .20 "1 : ji • ORTEGA' CAROL A YOUTH/LABORER MD 56.95 ORTIZ. KATHY L LABORERS M.D. 259.63 . PONCE, GLORIA LABORERS M.D. 268.00 • QUESAOA5 LORI A LABORERS M.O . - 56.95 REBERNIGG. KAROLINA K LABORERS M.D. 268.00 ID RECULE, RHONDA R LABORERS M.D. 17.59 REfFEL, TRACY B LABORERS M.D. 261 .30II • REYES. LILIA R LABORERS M.O. 83.75 - RIVERA, BRENDA L YOUTH/LABORER MD 117.25 . RIVERA, JUANITA L LABORERS M.D. 110.55 4I - RIVERA' MARIA A LABORERS H.D. 106.36 I ID ROBERTS' WILLIAM LABORERS M.D. ♦0.20 RODRIQUEZ" CYNTHIA N LABORERS M.D. 241 .20 .' ROGERS, SUZANNE M YOUTH/LABORER MD 80.40 . - ROSALES, LIZOETH A LABORERS M.D. 168.44 _ Ill SANCHEZ" BARBARA LABORERS M. D. 321 .60- SANTOS, IRENE R LABORERS M.D . 268.00 ID SEPEOA1 VICTORIA LABORERS M.D. 189.28 SIFUENTEZ. DOLORES M YOUTH/LABORER MD 187.60 . SMITH, ILENE D LABORERS M.D. 268.00 TEETS, STEVE LABORERS M.O. 16.75 WEEOMAN. MARGARET A LABORERS M.O. 268.00 • WHITE, ALLEN LABORERS M.D. 26.80 • i ZUMBRINK. KATHERINE E LABORERS M.O. 153.26 - ID s - • i I . I • • • • . • oh . • • I . IP .i IP ' / M. w. r ID • WAP200P MELD COUNTY BATE : 05/01/89 • MARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 05/01/89 • MARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER (ARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER EB DEPT 0BJ PROD AMOUNT • A1100J6 ADVANCED SYSTEMS SERVICE 58160 65-1191-b360 219.00 • • 219.00 • • Ai10037 ALTA HEALTH STRATEGIES 042889 83-9020-6350 5 ,835.59 I 11 5,835.59 I • • A110038 SOEHNER1 RALPH 7070M5 24-9034-6397-4715 215.00 • 215.00 • • Ai10039 BOTTLE HOUSE INC. 000597 01-1123-0599 20.00 • • 20.00 • 4 • AI10040 BRANTNER GENE ME0489 01-1011-6377-ALI 19.87 • MI0489 01-1011-6375-Alt 95.40 • 115 .27 • • A110041 CHESTNUT SQUARE APARTMENT 216104 24-9044-6397-4715 83.00 • 216105 24-9044-6397-4715 156.00 • 239.00 • • A110042 CITY Uf GREELEY 000588 01 -1123-6599 13 .00 • 13.00 • • A110043 COUNTY WORKER'S COMP POOL STM 66-9020-6510-WC 2 ,000.00 • 2,000.00 • • A110044 DUSIN, HiLA 231304 24-9044-6397-4715 106.00 • 231305 24-9044-6397-4715 244.00 • 350. 00 • • • I • • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/01/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 • AS OF : 05/01/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 41 NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PROJ AMOUNT • 4110045 FORT LUPTON G.I . FORUM 000594 01-1123-6599 25.00 • • 25 . 00 • • A110046 FT . LUPTUN PRESS 1257 01-1153-6437 3. 2041 1258 01-1153-6337 J. 20 • - 6.40 • • A110047 GORDON'S LIQUOR MART 000585 01-1123-6599 18.85 • 18.85 • ---- • A110048 GOUT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 459301 65-1191-6948 183.33 • 41 183.33 • • A110049 GREELEY GAILY TRIBUNE THE 042689 0I-1153-6337 15.04 • 15.04 • • 11110050 HARTFORD INSURANCE (THE) 042889 8J-9020-6350 7 .014.98 • 7.014. 98 • • A110051 HOLIDAY INN H14988 24-9043-6370-4150 56.00 • H14990 24-9043-6370-4150 56.00 • 112.00 • • A110054 HUGH M. WOODS 158294 25-9070-6210-GAL 7.98 • • 7.98 • • At10o54 ION 908601 65-1191-0360 252. 54 988604 65-1191-6300 207.65 • • 460. 19 41 • • • • 411 WAP200P WELD COUNTY OATS : 05/01/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • AS OF : 05/01/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUAUEH NUMBER FO UEPT UBJ PROJ AMOUNT • 4110054 I8M 9CQ460 65- 1191-6360 4 ,057.06 v 9CQ367 65-1191-6360 25.80 • 9CQ398 65-1191-6360 439. 40 ID 9R3654 65-1191-6360 4 ,057.06 9R3061 65-1191-6360 25.80 • 9R3694 65-1191-6360 439.40 • 91.1785 65-1191-6360 31861 . 93 911792 65- 1191-6360 26.80 • 911827 65-1191-6360 439.40 . 940399 65- 1191-6360 876.68 930412 65-1191-6360 ♦12.80 • 930413 65-1191-6360 99. 48 • 141760 . 61 IP • A110055 JOHNSON JACKIE ME0489 01-1011-6377-02 3.00 • MI0489 01-1011-6375-U2 21 .80 • 24.80 ID II A1100S6 K-MART 000590 01-1123-6599 11. 52 • 000591 01-1124-6599 12 .31 • 000598 01-1123-6599 11 .25 • 35.08_ • • • 4110057 KELRNES1 RICHARD M. 0428M1 01-1041-6470 33. 64 • 33.64 • • A11005d LUNG, UAL A. 1304V5 24-9044-6397-4715 50.00 • 50.00 • • 4110059 LUS ALEGRES ANCLMNUS 000595 01-1123-6599 20.25 • • 20. 25 • • A1100o0 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 309499 67-1192-6445-LD 520899 • 520.99 II • ID • ID ID I 1 WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/01/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 4 • AS OF 1 05/01/89 • WARRANT PAYE L= LNUDLCE ACCOUNT MUMMER WARRANT • NVMaLR NUMBER FO DEPT 081 PROJ AMOUNT • A1100b1 MILLER. WARY L. 000590 01-1123-6599 420.00 • • 420.0041 • A110062 NELSON. JOYCE b0IHV5 24-9044-b397-4715 321 .0041 321 . 00 • • A110063 NORTH W C HATER ULSTRLCT 321 25-9058-6397 1 ,091 .98 • 25-9071-6397-GAL 2 ,403.02 • 4,500.00 • • A11000♦ ULU HOME BREAD THRIFT 000593 01 -1123-6599 4.69 • 4. 69 • • • A1100b5 PETTY CASH-YOUTH SHELTER 050189 01-2330-6390 53.75 -_.._._ 51. 75 • • A1100ob SALOERG1 GILBERT 04276[ 01-1041-6370 78.40 • 78. 40 • • A110067 SELLE1 JAMES E . 0428111 01-1041-6370 139.20 • 139. 20 • • A110068 TODUY'S 000586 01-1123-6599 75.54 • 000587 01- 1123-6599 107.85 • 183. 19 • • A1100o9 U S SPRINT 172931 57-1192-6345-LD 11515. 11 • • 1 .515. 71_ • • • • • • • ID II WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/01/89 ` • WARRANT REGISTER PACE : 5 • AS OF : 05/01/89 • WARRANT PAYEL INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • AII0070 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 900691 67-1192-6345-LD 24. 13 67-1192-6345-LOLL 125.85 • 900973 67-1192-6345-LOCL 33. 13 • 902551 67-1192-6345-LO 17.00 67-1192-6345-LOLL 739. 28 • • 939.39 • • A110071 WAL-MARL DISCOUNT CITIES 000589 01-1123-6599 75.80 000592 01-1123-6599 71 .62 • • 147.42 • • FINAL TOTAL : 399598.95 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/01/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 6 • AS OF : 05/01/89 • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN UN PAGE I THROUGH 5 1 AND • DATED V5/Ol/H9, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD DE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES. WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT f 39,598.95 • • • DATED THIS 3r OF Mast/ t9 89__, • VINE TOR FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES ID • SUUSCRIBEU AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _4E,d___ DAY OF spy 1989_--• • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : A'lyCom'msson ExDresjtjre8, 1990 • • / / • . 44:..A. :L-mot C21-w sl;:_� rte'_-_- • NOTARY -PUBLIC • WE1 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY; COLORADO& HEREBY • {APPROVE) ( DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVEi AND WARRANTS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARC HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE General FUND - TOTALING S38,588'85 • DATED THIS 3rd DAY OF May 19 89 . • ID COUNTY ur LERK ADO RECORDER BY IP ates-'") • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • • _� 1 - -, MEMBER \ 1 MEMBER • • • ---- -- � -� MEMBER MEMBER /! • • • • • • • • ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 AS OF : 05102/89 • • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER Fl) DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT 41 0 A110072 AAA TRAVEL AGENCY 455104 21-6600-6373-9 452.00 • • 352.00 • • A110073 AGLAND INC 136976 01-2111-6361-SOPT 42.50 • 42.50 . • A110074 AGREN 6 BLANDO G ASOC INC 16765 01-1012-6350 275.00 • 275 . 00 Ill 0 A110075 AGUILAR. JUAN RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 10.00 • 10.00 • • A110076 AIMS COLLEGE 00M169 21-6510-6383-9 492.20 • 000159 21 -6380-6381-8 31144.00 21-6390-6381-8 821 .00 • 016558 21-6490-6382-8 39.93 • • _ 41497 . 13 • • A110077 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIV 042889 11-3146-6452 40 .00 . 40.00 • • A110078 ALCORN. THOMAS L . 81060 01-1012-6350 8 ,789. 88 • 8,789.86 • • • A110079 AMERICAN REO CROSS 003422 21-b620-6358^9 300.00 • 300.00 • • A110080 ANSON . ROSE 049260 79-4410-6143 11 .48 • 049270 79-4410-6143 67.50 • 78.98 • ID 0 ID • I i 1 I I I ID ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 105/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 AS Of 105/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OSJ PROD AMOUNT • • All0081 ARAGON ENTERPRISES, INC. 11936 60-2160-6599 202.00 • 202.00 • • A110082 BACHMAN, GOROON 1808 79-1041-6143 250.00 • • 250.00 s • A110083 BAILEY, HENRY F . JR. RF0489 01-2110-6599-CILL 10.00 • 10.00 • • A110084 BATTY PHYLLIS 042889 79-1031-6147 180.00 • 180.00 • • 4110085 BAXLEY) KATHY 042089 79-2160-6143 23.80 • • 23.80 ID • A110086 BLEUINS, RAYMOND RF0589 01 -2110-6599-CIVL 9.08 • 9. 08 • • A110087 BOWSHER, CHRIS RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIUL 9. 58 0 9. 58 • • A110088 BRAUN' ELISABETH Be M. 048740 79-4410-6143 4.97 • 067790 79-4410-6143 90.00 • 94. 97 0 • A1100d9 CARLSON• HELEN 3. RF05E9 01-2110-6599-CI.VL 10.00 • • 10. 00 • • • • • • . lI ID • • WAP200P MELD COUNTY GATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110090 GCS SUPPLY INC. RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 2.00 • 2. 00 • • A110091 CHAULK, SUE MG04t4 19-4130-6370-GHE 30,85 • 0415 19-4130-6370-1P 30.85 • 61 . 70 • • A110092 CHECKMATE, INC. 897732 01-1012-6350 12.00 • • _ 12. 00 • • A110093 COALOTION FOR A TOBACCO MEMBER 19-41106335 25.00 . 25.00 • • A110094 COLEY, ROBERT 08057 60-2160-6599 7. 13 • 7. 13 • 444 I • A110095 COLO DEPT OF HEALTH 081179 19-4140-6350-TB 536. 36 • • 536.36 • • A110096 COLORADO DEPT OF REVENUE FOODLI 19-4170-6599 80.00 • 80.00 • • A110097 COLORADO NAT'L BANK OF STM 01-9030-6530 135,000.00 • 01-9030-6620 41 ,214 . 11 • 176 ;214 . 11 • • A11OO98 COLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT REGFEE 21-6600-6373-9 780 .00 • • 780 . 00 • • • • • • I I I i III I i I I I I ..I i I • Ill • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 AS OF : 05/02/89 S 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OUJ PROJ AMOUNT 41 • A110099 COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN CO ST0489 21-6490-6356••8 21000.00 • 21000.00 • • A110100 COMPUTERWORLD O05C09 65-1191-6330 44. 00 • • 44.00 41 • A110101 COON, VIVIAN 03250 60-2160-6599 103. 24 • 103. 24 41 • A110102 COUGILLI PATRICK K. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIUL 10 .00 • 10.00 5 • A110103 CRAVEN KATHRYN MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 3.20 • • 3. 20 S • A110104 CREDITORS SERVICE BUREAU 042889 60-2160-6370 25.00 41 25.00 41 • A110105 CUNLIFFE CHUCK 045990 79-1014-6143 17 .00 41 17.00 • • 41 A1101O6 DAILY TIMES CALL 665428 21-6600-6337-9 370.50 • 370.50 . • A110107 DAILY TIMES CALL 017377 01-1021-6331 22 . 94 • C17376 01-1021-6331 36. 00 • 58.94 . 41 • 41 • • l i I 7 Il • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : S AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 41 4I A110108 DAVIS G RIEUMAtt, LTD. RFQ489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 5 .60 • 5.60 • i P110109 DELE01 LAURA U. RF0589 01-21 ►0-6599-CIVL 12. 14 • • 12. 14 • • A110110 DILL' RICK 045580 79-2110-6141 70. 00 MD 70.00 A110111 DUNBAR LYDIA MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 32 .40 • 32. 40 4 • A1101►2 ELLWOOD' HENRY V. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 1 . 90 e • 1 .90 . . A110114 ELTON, SUSAN 042789 79-1154-6143 7.00 • 043089 79-1154-6144 115.62 4596 79-► 154-6147 5.00 41 127. 62 • • 61110114 FAULKNER , PRISCILLA MG0414 194 ►30-6370GHE 91 .00 • 0415 19-4130-6370-INJ 119. 40 . 0416 19-4130-6370-TP . 40 . 0417 19-4130-6370-TOU 61 .20 . 272 . 00 . • A110115 FEUERSTEIN MARY ANN MARAPS 01-1025-6370 460. 10 • 460. 10 ID 41 A110116 FLIETHMAN , KIM 0642 79-2111-6147 125. 40 ID IP 41 ID IP ■ Ill ID O WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 . , WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • • A11O116 FLIETHMANI KIM 125.40 IP • A110117 FOX. MARY K . MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 8. 40 w 8. 40 • • AllOlld FRANZEN; DUANE GENE 042989 79-1191-6147 61 .00 • 61 .00 • • A110119 FRONTIER PRIVATE PROCESS RF0489 01-2110-6599-C1VL 24.60 • • 24.60 • _ • A110120 GAFFEY, JOLENE R. 042689 01-1021-6350 160. 00 . 160. 00 ID • A110121 GALICIA, RAMONA ML0489 21-6650-6372-9 3. 20 • 3.20 • • A110122 GARNSEY I. WHEELER CO 7725 OI-2111-6361-SOPT 500. 00 • 66-9020-6740-LIAR 759. 10 • 1 ,259. 10 • • A110123 GARZA; ANGCLLNA F00489 21-6600-6377-9 5. 58 • • _ 5. 58 • • A110124 GEESAMAII STERLING 544118 01-2110-6315-JAIL 11 . 98 • 11 . 98 ID • A110125 GLLBAUGH AGENCY RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 10 . 00 ID • il • • 41 ♦ • • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110125 GILBAUGH AGENCY 10.00 • • A110126 GINSBERG1 SHELDON K . RF0589 01 -2110-6599-CIVL. 9.06 • 9.06 • • A110127 GORDON1 RANDY M.D. MG0427 19-4110-6370 329.80 • 329 . 80 • • A110128 GRAHAM, CHARLES 11634 60-2160-6599 272.00 • • 272 .00 • • A110129 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 041589 01- 1153-6437 7. 36 • 7. 36 • • A110130 GREENBERG EDWARD S RF0489 01-2110-6599-GIVE 2. 12 • • 2. 12 • A110131 HAHA. CHARLES D. RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 7.92 • • 7. 92 • • A110132 HAMMERS, URN MI0427 01-2150-6370 24.60 • 24 .60 • • A110133 HAROGRAVE1 CHARLOTTE 5(0489 21-6510-6356-9 360.00 • 360.00 • • A110134 HARTMAN, JOHN P. RFO589 O/-2110-6599-CIVL 2. 02 • • 2.02 • • • • • i . • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 IP WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ♦ NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OUJ PROJ AMOUNT ID 4I A110135 HEALTHCARE UNITED 06546 60-2160-6599 244. 40 ♦ 244.40 41 • A110136 HIGH PLAINS LIVESTOCK RF0489 0t-2110-6599-CIUL 2.50 ID ♦ 2. 50 ♦ ♦ A110137 HIGH/SCOPE CONFER 21-6600-6373-9 115 . 00 115 .00 Iii ID A1t0138 HINDMAN. THOMAS RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 6.20 ♦ ID 6. 20 • A1 /0139 HOLLAND, HILARY RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 13. 80 4I ♦ 13.80 ♦ ♦ A110140 HOLMES. CLAYTON RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 6.64 • 6. 64 Ill ID A110141 HUMANA CLAIMS OFFICE 042589 60-2160-6599 168.30 ♦ 168 . 40 • • A110142 IOM 8GV116 65-1191-6360 1 .090.44 ID 8GV117 65-1191-6360 207 .20 ♦ 9GV120 65-1191-6360 207. 65 ID 1 .505.29 ID ID A110143 ION YC0854 65-1191-6360 4.057 . 06 ♦ 9C8861 65-t191-6360 25.80 9C1$892 65-1191-6360 439. 40 9H4471 65-1191-6160 19 . 51 Ill ID ID ID • 0 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A110144 IDM 9KFJ2b 65-1191-6360 828. 00 • 5369. 77 • ® A110144 IBM CORPORATION 983516 65-1191-6360 252.54 • 983517 65-1191-6360 207.65 • 90N914 65-1191-6360 264.58 • 9071917 65- 1191-6760 207.65 985813 65-1191-6360 453.27 • 985815 65-1191-6360 207 .65 • 1 ,593. 34 • • A110145 INTERNATIONAL HAZARDOUS MEMBER 19-4170-6335-P 36 . 00 • 36.00 • • A110146 JOHN DEERE INSURANCE UST 03986 60-2160-6599 25.00 • • 25.00 • • A110147 JOHN HANCOCK INSURANCE 03827 60-2160-6549 .80 • .80 • • A110148 JOHNSON, LINDA MG0420 19-4170-6370-M 51 . 20 • 0421 19-4170-6370-P 30.80 • 82.00 • • A110149 JUARE2, ANGELINA MG0419 19-4140-6370-TB 51 .20 • 51 . 20 • • A110150 KENNEDY, CRAIG A RF0489 01-2110-6599-CLVL 8.86 • • 8.86 • • • • • • • l • ID • • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110151 KNIGHT , KENNETH M RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIUL 10.00 • 10.00 • • A110152 %NUPE. BESS 12338 60-2160-6599 27.00 • • 27.00 • • AllO1S3 KOCH. CARMELITA M10489 21-6650-6372-9 ♦3. 80 • 43. 80 • • A110154 KRITZER. STUART A RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 5. 10 I . 5. 10 • • A110155 LACY, GORDON ME0489 01-1011-6377-01 56. 11 • MI0489 01-►011-6375-01 119.00 • 175. 11 • • A110156 LARIMER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 44529 11-3132-6371 48. 15 • • _ 48. 15 • • A110157 LAU, NOON XI RF0569 01 -2110-6599-CIVL 13.72 . 13.72 • • A110158 LEBSACK) ROSE 12036 60-2160-6599 243.06 • 243. 06 • S A110159 LEGAL SERVICES OF EAST RF0469 01-2110-6599-CIVL 10. 00 • • 10.00 • • • • • • • I . ID IP • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/02/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : I1 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCCUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT 4I ID AII0160 LEWIS, VINCENT 12043 60-2160-6599 249.00 • 249.00 • • A110161 LIBRARY CORPORATION ( THE) 936293 52-5530-6322 2 ,010. 00 • • 2 ,010.00 • AttOlb2 LIND. ELMER RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 20.00 20.00 A110163 LONGS DRUGS 011782 01-2111-6220-LAD 1 .31 011818 01-2111-6220-LAO 16. 50 • 011822 0t-211t-6220-LAO 2 . 57 • 011828 01-2111-6220-LAd 3.93 011834 01-2111-6220-LAB 1 .31 O 011843 O1-2111-6220-LAB 4. 71 • 011849 01-2111-6220-LAB 4. 19 • 34 .52 • • A110164 LOVELAND DAILY REPORTER- 037486 21-6600-6337-9 348.00 • • 348.00 • IP At10165 MAJORS WELDING 6 SUPPLY 11536 19-4170-6250-GNRL 9.00 • 9.00 41 ID A110166 MAURER. HAZEL MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 20.60 • 20.60 ID • P110167 MAY. AN0RE M.D. CHP424 19-4140-6350-C11P 124. 50 • • 124.50 • ID ID • • I I I Ii,� • I ■ a ammommiammi • • • MAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 12 AS OF : 05/02/89 • MARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • Al1Ol6d MCB£E BINDERS 270995 01-2111-6220-INVT 149.64 149 .64 • A110169 MCCLOSKEY, CHRIS 050189 79-1191-6147 80.00 S • 80.00 • • A110170 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES, INC. 213939 21-6600-6222-9 116.21 . 213979 21-6600-6222-9 77 .47 • 193,68 • • A110171 MEDICARE 42589 60-2160-6599 52 . 10 . 52. 10 • • A110172 METPATH/PIERCE MEDICAL 4841 19-4140-6350-MAT 24 .00 • 24 .00 • • 41 A110173 METRO WEST PUBLISHING INC 1247 01-1021-6331 13. 76 • 13.76 41 • A110►7♦ METZGER MICHAEL IC 3290 79-2110-6143 500.00 . 500.00 41 • A110175 MIDGLEY1 SCUTT A RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 8.00 • 8.00 • • A110176 MIKE'S CAMERA Q06921 19-4170-6250-GNRL 74. 85 • • 74 . 85 . • • • 41 ` • • ID ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1J AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INUOLCI ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT ODJ PROJ AMOUNT ID • A110177 MIRASAL1 VIVIAN L. 042889 79-4410-6147 210.25 ID II 210.25 • A110178 MLZNER1 SHARON 0. RF0589 01 -2110-6599-CLVL 7 . 52 • 7.52 • • A110179 MODULAIRE-OENVER 006039 21-6590-6358-9 18977.00 . 18977.00 4I IP A110180 MONFORT OF CO 12116 60-2160-6599 254.22 • 254.22 • • A110181 MOORE ' 0. PRESTON GYM RF0489 01-21106599C1VL 15.00 • • 15.00 • • A110182 MOTOROLA C 8. E INC 065570 60-2160-6940 396. 02 • 396.02 • • A1L0183 NELSON, HARVEY MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 12 .00 • 12. 00 • • A110184 NEUE' S UNIFORMS INC 803669 01-2110-6225-TRNG 134. 50 1 804132 01-2110-6225-TRNG 65.80 • 804175 01-2110-6225-TRNG 47. 80 . 804311 01-2110-6225-TRNG 32 .90 • 281 .00 II • AL10185 NICOLET INSTRUMENT CORP V91191 01-2118-6223 149.00 • 149.00 Il 4I ID . ID • NAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 14 ID AS OF : 05/02/49 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110186 NOLANI KEVIN J. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 1 .60 • 1 .60 • • ID AI10187 NOWAK, LYNDA MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 7.20 21-6700-6372-9 11 .28 • 21-6850-6372-9 1 .20 21-6950-6372 2 .40 • 22.08 • • A110188 ULER1 GAYLE E RF0489 01 -2110-6599-CIVL 8. 16 • 8. 16 • • AT10181 UNE HOUR PHOTO EXPRESS 14322 O1-2111-6220-50PT 9 .44 • 9.44 • • A110190 OSCO DRUG COMPANY 280686 21-6600-6224-9 79.68 • • 79.88 ID • A110191 PADILLA, LUCY CATHY RF0589 01 -2110-6599-CIVL 9. 78 • 9.78 • • A110192 PARRISH, GRACE 12208 60-21606599 421 .00 • 421 .00 • • A110193 PATTEN ELVIN D 045870 79-2310-6144 39.50 • 04999D 79-2310-6143 62. 50 II 102.00 • • A110194 PENNINGTON. ANNE ELIZADET 1294 79-2150-6143 19.50 • • 19.50 • • • • • i II l ii , I o • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 15 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ♦ II A110195 PERKINS . SCOTT MG0420 19-4170-6370-S 41 . 20 • 0421 19-4170-6370-W 24 .40 • 0422 19-4170-6370-F 22.00 0423 19-4170-6370-2 6 . 00 • 0424 19-4170-6370-P 11. 60 • 0425 19-4170-6370-A 23.60 0426 19-4170-6370- I 9.80 • 138.60 • • A110196 PETERSON, RUSSELL 12020 60-2160-6599 277 .55 • • _ 277.55 • I • A110197 PETTY CASH - H R 0 POST 21-6950-6311 25.00 ID 25.00 ID ID A110198 POOLE, CAROL 043089 79-1126-6143 106. 12 • 2854 79-1126-6147 239.00 • 345. 12 • ID A110199 PORTER SUPPLY 9442 01-1061-6250JANT 11602. 00 • • 1 ,602 .00 • A110200 POUDRE VALLEY REA 27120 01-1061-6340-ROAD 29.24 • 69464 01-5220-6340 112.50 • • 141 .14 • A110201 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTNS 5441 65-1191-6220 47.00 • • 47.00 • • A110202 PRIBILA. ROBERT F . RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 7.60 • 7.60 ID ID ID ID 0 • s • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 16 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110203 PRICHARD, BRENTON 12198 60-2160-6599 152, 14 • 152 . 14 • • A110204 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF CULO 24372 0I-106 /-6340-ROAD 7.6♦ • 4024 01-1061-6341-LIB 1 ,621 .87 • 41671 01-1061-6340-ROAD 11 . 16 • 4360 01-1061-6340-ROAD 46.68 i • 1 ,687. 35 • • A110205 RAYNER WATER DEPT 11489 01-1061-6340-ROAD 30.00 • 30.00 • • A110206 RINEHOLO , ALICE MG0421 19-4170-6370-F 115. 60 • 0422 19-4170-6370-P 34.60 • 0423 19-4170-6370-5 55.60 0424 19-4170-6370-W 5.80 • 0425 19-4170-6370-A 4.00 41, 0426 19-4170-6370-1 6. 10 • 221 .70 . • 4110207 RINGSIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 76447 01-2310-6220-ISOP 162. 15 ' 162.75 • • A110208 ROOBIO, LYNN MG0421 19-4170-6370-S 38. 40 • 0422 19-4170-6370-W 32. 40 • 0423 19-4170-6370-P 4.00 0424 19-4170-6370-F 1 . 70 • 0425 19-4170-6370- I 2.00 • 78. 50 • • A110209 ROCKY MOUNTAIN FOOD SAFTY REG AR 19-4170-6335-F 35.00 • 35.00 • • • • • • • 4I 0 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 17 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMDER WARRANT • NUMBER HUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PROD ANOINT • • A110210 ROCKY MTN HOME TRANSPORT RF0489 01-2110-6599-CLUL 1 .54 • 1 . 54 • • ID 4110211 ROSALES. CHRISTIhE MI0489 21-6600-6375-9 20.60 • 20. 60 • • 4110212 ROTO ROOTER SERVICE 20850 01-1061-6360-CC 125.00 . 125 .00 • 0 4110213 RUNDUS, CAROLYN J 1110428 01-1012-6370 35.00 • 046240 79-1012-614J - 407.08 • 442,08 • A110214 SAFEWAY STORES INC 152220 21-6600-6222-9 32. 73 32. 73 • • A110215 SARGENT. LEE A. RF0589 01 -2110-6599-CLVL 9.40 • 9. 40 • • 4110216 SCHMICT1 JUDY MG0421 19-4170-6370-W 1 .60 • 0422 19-4170-6370-P 23. 80 0423 19-4170-6370-E 28. 60 • 54 .00 • • 4110217 SCHNEIDER, TOM M.D. FP042♦ 19-4140-6350-FP 52 . 50 • • 52. 50 • A110218 SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-I ST0489 21-6490-6358-8Y 1 ,700.00 • 11700. 00 • • • • 0 • ;7 • WAP20OP MELO COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 18 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PRO.' AMOUNT • • A110219 SCHROEDER, MICHAEL K. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CLVL 9. 36 O 9. 36 • • A110220 SCHkART2, MARY 130391 O1-211O6315-CIVL 14 .21 • • 14 .21 • • 4110221 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 80H489 19-4110-6370 4. 00 • 890420 01-..21116220-50P1 170. 50 • 174. 50 . • A110222 SHAPIRO, KENNETH S RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 10. 00 • 10.00 • • A110223 SHAPIRO1 M. , M.O. FP0424 19-4140-6350-FP 87. 50 • 87. 50 • • A110224 SHEF ENTERPRISES, INC . A49233 01 -2111-6320-NOPT 1 , 102. 72 • A49392 OI-2110-6320-ADM 62.76 • A49393 01-2111-6320-NOPT 603.04 . A49394 01-2111-6420-NOPT 649.67 • 2 ,418. 19 • • A110225 SIEGRIST CUNSTRUCTION CO 3959 11-3190-6471 323.65 • 323.65 • • A110226 SMITH, PAM MG0421 19-4170-6370-2 34 .80 • 0422 19-4170-6370-S 26.80 • 0423 19-4170-6370-f 6.20 0424 19-4170-6370-4 1 . 40 • 0425 19-4170-6370-P . 20 • 0426 19-4170-6370-M 35.60 • 105.00 • • • • • 1 iii I i I I I I i I I I I ■ • • • WAP200P WELU COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 41WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 19 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO OEPT 06J PROJ AMOUNT • 41 A110227 STANG, UAUIO 062189 79-4410-6147 60.00 . 042689 79-4410-6147 60 .00 12611 79-4410-6143 293. 80 • 12791 79-4410-614J 310.04 . 230391 79-4410-6143 49. 92 230401 74-4410-6143 8. 40 • 230411 79-4410-6143 14.00 . 230421 79-4410-6143 5. 00 41328783 79-4410-6143 11 . 20 . 812.36 • 41A110226 STARKS WILLIAM 050189 79- 1123-6147 200 .00 • 200. 00 • 41 - A110229 STATE OF COLORADO RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 10. 00 • 10.00 • • A110230 ST£TTNER, KENNETH R. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL. 10.00 • . 10.00 - • . A110231 STEVENS AUTOMOTIVE INC 25854 01-2111-6361 -SOPT 7. 98 • 7 .98 41 41 A1102J2 STEVENSON. TERESA ROSE 050189 79-2110-6147 276 .00 • 276. 00 • • A110233 STIPECH1 JOHN A RF0489 01-2110-6599-CIVL 6. 88 • • 6.88 • . A110234 STOLL JEFFREY MG0421 19-4170-6370-S 49.00 41 0422 19-4170-6370-A 7.00 0423 19-4170-6370-F .80 • 41 41 • • 41 III i • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 20 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PR0J AMOUNT 1 • • 4110234 STOLL JEFFREY 0424 19-4170-6370-P 1 . 20 • 58.00 • • 4110235 STORAGE INN, THE 000529 21-6600-6346-9 100.00 • • 100. 00 • • A110236 STREET, CINDY ME0425 01-2150-6370 88. 96 • 88. 96 • s A110237 TACKER JEANNIE FD0489 21-6490-6377-8 25.05 • 21-6640-6377-8 14 .02 • MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 50.50 21-6600-6372d 8. 40 • 21-6640-6372-8 59 . 15 • 21-6950-6172 6. 16 • 163. 28 • • A110238 TEAL ELIZABETH MI0489 21-6650-6372-9 69.06 • 69, 06 • • A110239 THOMPSON, PETER k, 0,0.S ST0489 21-6600-6350-9 360.00 • 360.00 • • A110240 THREE M BUSINESS PRODUCTS XU3494 O1-211O-622O-RECD 79. 30 • • 79.30 • • A110241 TRI-TOWN MARKET 39 21-6600-6222-9 12 . 13 • 12 . 13 • • 4110242 TRINEN, DONALD T . RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 9, 36 • • 41 • • r • MAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 21 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110242 TRINEN, DONALD T. 9.36 • • A110243 TSUKAMOTO JUDITH A APR89 01-1021-6370 24.00 • 24.00 • • A110244 TURNER, MARIANNA MI0489 21-6830-6472-9 4.04 • 050489 21-6830-6220-9 2.35 • PP0489 21-6830-6372-9 10.30 • 16.69 • • A110245 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 040789 8S-2155-6345 190.20 • i 190.20 • • A110246 VANDENBERGE, KEITH J. RF0589 01-2110-6599-CIVL 11 .66 • 11 .66 • • A110247 WASTE SERVICES INC 48189 01-1061-6360-CC 7.00 • • 7.00 • • A110246 WEATHERLY, GORDON 85CV58 01-1012-6350 206.25 • 206.25 • • A110249 WELCH, JAN 045490 79-1153-6143 17. 19 • 047210 79-1154-6143 16. 41 • 049810 79- 1153-6143 100. 16 426071 79-1153-6147 165.00 • 298 . 76 • • A110250 WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT STPPD 21-6490-6356-b 21 . 00 • 89PPDS 21-6600-6390-9 12,00 • • I' • 41 • • 0 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 22 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE IhVOTCE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID 0 • A110250 WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 33.00 • • A110251 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 2948 88-2112-6220-POSE 105.00 2955 01-2150-6370 95.00 • 2956 65-1191-6312 8.87 • 208.87 • A110252 WHEATCRAFT , JERI ME0425 01 -2150-6370 29. 03 • • 29.03 . • A110253 WORD SYSTEMS OF COLO 19527 01-2111-6220-NOPT 125. 00 • 125. 00 A110254 WYCO L .P. GAS , INC 20402 01-1061-6340-ROAD 176.96 • 20411 01-1061-6340-ROAD 56. 88 . 233 .84 A110255 YAUCHZEE, BILLY ME428 01-3700-6310 39.05 • MI428 01-3700-6310 173. 20 05428 01-3700-6310 2. 86 PA428 01-3700-6310 2 .25 • 217 .36 • • AI10256 YOUNG, SUE 042889 79-1031-6143 62. 75 0 113332 79-1031-6143 5.00 • 87 .75 • • A110251 [RNIEL; ROBERT F . HF05B9 Ol -2110-6599-GIVE 2. 74 • • 2 .74 • • 0 0 0 ID • WAP200P WELO COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 23 AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT O$J PROJ AMOUNT 41 • 4110258 ZELLER OIL COMPANY 02888 61-9020-6245 629. 08 • 61-9020-6246 227. 43 • 02889 61-9020-6245 J45. 75 61-9020-6246 351 .89 • 02929 6L-9020-6246 555.07 • 02986 61-9020-6246 514.01 • 2 .623.23411 • FINAL TOTAL : 2J36994. 1♦ 41 • • 41 • 41 • • • 41 • • • 41 • • • 41 • 41 • 41 ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 24 AS OF : 05/02/89 ID ill THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 23 , AND • • DATED 05/02/89, ANO THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE - e AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 233,994.14 . • DATED THIS U Y 0n /y_; 2. 19 gg__• • • Cc e 41 DIREC OR F FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES S SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __3yd__ DAY OF _Pia -_ t9„02.........., • • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES :MY Commas+on Exp;reslur.e8, 1990 • • r7 . 1 / • a d.:ct�ti.. Ay _ YGi1S„fib?^ NOTARY-YZUL LC • • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY . (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON 0 41, THE General FUND - TOTALING i_ 233x994,14 . DATED THIS 3rd DAY OF __HSI 1989 . ! aA1h O • COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • r... /,( // .,G/ • _----_ ��15.?Z4<�2__ $._J-__ 1"' H R I RM A N • DEPUTY C MEMBER MEMBER • 7-1,-K _- • • ...a. tt ate MEMBER MEMBER i/ • ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : I AS OF : 05/02/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 'I s IP 5829756 URISIOL-ROBLNSON PROP 12-4499-6714-WCSS 220.00 220.00 • • 5829757 ROBERT CLEFT 12-4499-6714-MCS5 240.00 • • 240. 00 • • 5829758 COLONIAL ARKS APTS 12-4499-6714-WCSS 240. 00 240 , 00 • 5829759 GREENPOINT APARTMENTS 12-4499-6714-MCS5 240.00 • II 240 .00 • 5829760 NORMA KNUTSON 12-44:9-6714-MCS5 160.00 • • 160.00 • 5829761 HANS MEYER 12-4499-6714-MCS5 220.00 • 220.00 ID IP 5829762 DICK NOLAN 12-4499-6714-WCSS 220.00 ID 220.00 O • 5829763 KEYMEN AGENCY 12-4499-6714-MCS5 240.00 • • 240.00 • • 5829764 PUJLIC SERUICE CO 12-4499-6714-WCSS 47. 71 • 12-4499-6714-MCSS 91.00 • 140.71 • II IP ID 41 • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 105/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE I 2 AS OF : 05/02/89 ® WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 41 • 5829765 SOUTHMOOR TOWNHOUSE APTS ►2-4499-6714-WCSS 240 . 00 • 240.00 • • • 5829766 GEORGE VILLA 12-4499-6714-WCSS 175 .00 • 175. 00 • • 5829767 VILLA WEST MOBILE EST 12-4499-6714-WCSS 165.00 • 165.00 41 • 5829768 WOODLANDS EAST 12-4499-6714-SCSS 75.00 • • 75 .00 • 5 $829769 PUBLIC SERVICE CO I2-4463-6710-8788 52.52 12-4463-6710-8788 152.74 • 12-4463-67108788 114.77 • 12-4463-6710-8788 83.94 12-4463-6710-8788 170.60 0 • 574 .57 • • 5829770 OODOSUN SERVICES 12-4463-6710-8788 215.00 • 215. 00 • • 5829771 LAURA ALVARADO 12-4462-6710-8788 10.66 • 10. 86 • • 5829772 GREELEY GAS CO 12-4462-6710-8788 21 .99 • 41 21 .99 41 S829773 PUBLIC SERVICE CO 12-4462-6710-87d8 10. 00 • • 10.00 • ♦ • • • ID IP • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 AS OF : 05/02/39 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • • FINAL TOTAL : 3,408 . 13 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ID ' � • MAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/02/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 AS OF : 05/02/84 41 41 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 3 , AND • • DATED 05/02/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 4__3.408. 13 . 4, DATED THIS _ 7'd_ MY a r Ma;(// I989___.411 D DIRE TO NAN AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES S SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3rd _ DAY OF Ma'Y 1489 . • KY COMMISSION EXPIRES : My Coro is:Ior1 Expires Jure b,t9' . . • NOTARY-fUULLC • • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • (APPROVE) IDISAPPROUE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE ; AND WARRANTS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Social Services FUND - TOTALING $ 3;408. 13 411 DATED THIS 3rd 3r DAY OF Ma,2 1989 411 -aktits&J 41 CUUHT`,� ILLERR AND RECORDER BY • d...1-,./et 411 J DEPUTY CHAIRMAN I 4 eC4-44a‘42t j BER MEMBER Sze tat • MEMBER MEMBER • i • • • • • • \kran% / 87 V.C_D Cr, ry .r;cs STATE OF COLORADO , r-, C6?ok'iob IPARTMENT OF HEALTH e c '4�jv��r, 11th Avenue tat.. • TO 6hlfn '@p o$o 802x0 1E 0.8333 \�'�,.fj/ rya Rov Romer Governor Thomas M.Vernon. M.L. April 24, 1989 Executive Director To All Counties The Water Quality Control Division has recently received information about a number of public drinking water systems which have been built without plans being reviewed by our Drinking Water Unit. State law requires that final plans be reviewed and approved prior to construction. In addition, new central wastewater treatment systems are required to go through a site application process as well as having plans reviewed and approved by the Division. As requests for new subdivisions or other projects involving a change in land use which incorporate water and/or wastewater systems are submitted to you, we would greatly appreciate your making it known to the applicant that engineering plans must be reviewed by this Department. Questions can be addressed to this Department at 331-4545 for drinking water or 331-4563 for wastewater. Sincerely, • /.672 Ho Hfirector d Water Quality Control Division ri;*\(";5):1-t. 1 3 ,gq a' CT I70/ APT 27 V• Law Offices of rr BOPP, BECKMANN & LIONBERGER, P.C. C_C ,( 2130 Mountain View Avenue, Suite A TO THE B0A 7D Longmont, Colorado 80501 Waberl,Hopp Teleran Thetas L BooWtmn 303.7764045 (Local) Jams A.Lmberger 303449.2977(Mere) Jeffrey D.Lan John D.Riedodr Mar R Cadaon Pas Wunber Wayne M Keubnan 7(73-7)68709 Richard E.Snnaon,P.C. OfCowet Alan D.Carlson Marlin J.Joyce April 26, 1989 Clerk of Weld County Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Notice of Proposed Annexation to the Town of Frederick ,Colorado Dear Madam or Sir: Enclosed please find a copy of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING published in the Farmer&Miner on April 19, 1989 regarding a proposed annexation to the Town of Frederick. This notice is sent to you pursuant to Colo.Rev.Stat. 31-12-108(2). Very truly yours, Richard E. Samson Attorney for the Town of Frederick drb Enclosures Return receipt requested - P 996 922 435 5e V A I. • Pop 12 FARMER & MINER April 19, 1969 • C LEGAL NOTICES IMO**(1"' •"I./.lI Wan /• loll ' E•aa II001 .,,F. M.• a 1N11.e. Now • sow feel]Wince Man•1m,Ir tool *new•I EPIF'!E'r•ilw.M W EELEi ball lMIM1 Mefllr Set law l••th trill's iWestete •,rile E•. 163.0 /ore; //.a��.,... L 01.11 11.1)1 dislrw a//f.IR.. N,IIMe N1rw •1.4nta 1111 s,.wawWVfd,C113 1] Wes !sage" ., a 119'N' 1111,00 1!113 Manta 14.nk pg. West 1T.11 Ie•; ellewiM 0.51 Si.'..'M' 11.1 1]01.11 /oIl Feedtlki .•, hole • Pua11 M•.N•wen n,*M 161 ryes NN Not; Wen n110 E , 1aIE t•Mlwemina n was week M earic• r e a gnaw sant Ow4411.0. l 1400 Ml sit ane* •yl-I P,n.,11/1. WM al'. 11114 a ite ow wset n f, oowthrW, 1 M•••ryes Tee Man, 1/006.101, wow 1 owe an Mint lent • they theln E•sa title trot name*, MSA. wows,. Wa g01.I, MII • Mlen4 Na; Assets to•, TI. rM0.e. .1 Ws .uMle w•LtM• al VO.H WOW Mann .. ,'. f C. 'hones Worth •yaw ettrI- Wee• lei t. 119. 'li East 345.17 I•eq Mwl.t .IM N. IS tNetnas• INII than, 'warm win, IM MI•RN elver•M4 M el•wavy f. 0 .54%i I.nN. M1E.•M• n. twM M of SW WMMau pw• R+11.4 (0011.00 Mang t r1• .Ne%MM•.Rah MMIMe now M•N swear )0*wet 1.!)'N Ilrw M .00 Mw, • .Mold r •veer.a. M.1 1h* NPIklMt YNM 5411.14 Mint Oen'. 'wain ate 11 rant.. TM11•1 gold i n 0's•S.wany If M w144• or 00100'00` ,,- 2016 Owl I N•ban Non.RySN- (en "...Sae.1 Carer". "mg •W M. Set .'..M' Ees1 Of 1.01 Seel.01t•Mamma. •1 1p1.N pint tn.•t Tenn lo Wow ]..n Sen NtMe•Ma M,0sl n'M' E,1 MOW• y 1* an era M•e.rny •I s a s it 1h* M,1 mrs"nr0• iil.n O.ry Item,Mona S.M 11EM•M..1.•IO• , woes Cww• MM . 1440 E.011M O• e,ta. al•curve O IN.ells Ws Mw Road NuaO•• Ifs thane" Mwn. leIis w E.MW I we wNrM' MYME•10.450'•al Iarta.Mn,. 6.11*wean, •11.1.a an it w as by r•fwI'it% MtMn, tanked angle .I 45 tear, Own, IOr /wM.In, •,,4••51 1 ,1451"'ease ,a•y agrw n Mr•. .d 400 we Man Mnk I S11'1f MM0 4010'•' teal 41.11 Was PS1" Wawa• ins in note 1a. 510 Mi.i1 Mnl• mown, a Mama .hWoe.ih '0914- Eq1 nun.IM OeNn. wen Wm, 117.10 ' it mane. M•Iln 1H,Y Mn 1 .1 .MM lt•10 -ol.ngl•0. }09'01" Ew.l Rift 1••11 a•No M IM NIOM IeM twin ;,M4 if M Whew..OM M. Weer yang Gym We e•ale.•1a hwlsl•IMIIS M 00wa0' lee,• ta Oalnn M*.ldble Ina( IM NM• M IM slid.ef.Mwp t• t. emMMO tingle al 1040r 10', creed IIM.w•O*MtMMI.1 A.M.". an If 4511.66 1,0, • tantl•1 0•0d on lien Mork 10411) sate Mew M etPNbW loo O rite•1 IS'S', theta a wale Ewe YI•Id loll • India., 0 M WO* a Ceee on lea 1n M •11 ant• Maw 1004•'.1' Fns, 11600 len; Owns" 44•0 ft IM a,0.na lec a lba 1••••t" Of.01 Mal a Mean, a 514.34 2002WIr foe 111.6 /eel, • Ow In IM ally• 01 M to"n MM.010.1,WPM 0040,0 E•el 1MM.Woe IS w0 0 a aurae I. Cla.3 n Ow bur al h"Mdm,et •,,,,"'00' Mary Sauw Wu MM nM1 ewer W .,•w. n Ins s., C,ei H.n M•b, N•00'00 Foil COI Si! 1. I noel 1111.14 Wei, a tannin /ranted it IlNe •01]1. Polnl an IM Fool IIM •1 file mile el wipe; 0.14 of wee Oahe In• Ifw dtt a ••116 woo Cnunn Rare MUMMr r] are Si.. MwM IYII'Os- I1th • 1.•t. rn•IM•.INS,!.wing along 010 NI.Is MITI a IIMMt• 4.1.11 1MYM CF !WI In. Sint*Mn0'.1' Wye% 1h*la•pan,no IM Well MV at FRFOtbCM, CO(ORIOO s10.11 wow;te, wont*0•n1 1e• ee hale tNlww•a• Tinto. of Nti., al•Ms le M II.M 01(6 two• f•whence EM Wa NNM' eve• F 1 M1!Mw 6454 OelMl n••ht s wee a a1 010.0 Mei,a eve theme hen NamT 000110' I CITY C1FRE .1 aka snlb al N0).',1', tone East 4000.42 MITI Own" •Ilat l el ton of Mona Saul%5,5th.3 w11*we lbw St Nn oriel?0 Wwl 4,.. ITII • Melees a w"a11nim WI In•WPM a•is 1 Publish*/ In Inc Peony, end 11•si Ian le a MIm•n IM Wen WIIIwty Ile to told e,da., a ,,80'" it,it,4h* 7 and re. How se Ow sawh••a nun s. wl Sew In Weld Saintly.Rood H.• sale We.; 11: IMne•110114 4-1' MUTnw IS: (4.456. 111'••0 M wile We.1 lhrs Sn4rn 0012071' Woe., Ion. t1 , enn•wing Woe IOM 1I feta la I who an elt tewwg,Went,.45sel thew.of a l TIM41 I Fn,tny rtgla al bey lint o Wee .'e 01 Ore will(send owns a 1010 I3 IEOPI. Of1COlr110N CouTF 0.00 13 wane• III In• • lieu. 11 099.10 r•el. beau In r al Innen II .10.0 Gaels tl 11011113-. Men el rr.l r11,<1 nl (told •uuMN In 01.0. South 11011 " W0•1 et Wed Mt bens PlinthIdl 01y1Y" Iha Wert "Nl al ";4545. 11. 1.1t.iy 1t•1: Mimeo 91145 Ied fell 377.0 will • ea•M. sl easterly ROmabrft Ili el Pied 31114 laW; I M•lu ^5. I Won. III„•• r 1]an,Mnnt u we a•two,In 0alta'er Foal RN ale feel fa i W,w 1 o Seuww•• 1yw11t if w1 else(nal levee hale,a'el 01111 sews nl OIEM,aa isnaMng S""4" i1 M1.n,N• 2 a"1a. •s M 04114 10'0• tongs,en. 47,111 sews woe n.yen. a vela. '..88`81 h t gilt nl „ham there n on are Plall ,heel .IUMI, et a111nn .•. „hula 141611 West tvwlahe4 In I•,wn •old lseneoP I Nam.Ranw a Wa won lima • 1P,,,,, at 101E YM,A0" 0e !-Shy 1 ate/ M. IM •w M1nury al Mittin,. Inn ghetto,. Soul% 100]7 CC ."•" Wi le en,m1Y m tt g3.n. beg woy 45111 feel: hiliblit,I•1 .Inn, M1n.e ,I el."'" ..tl,h"d w Ws ate " nl•en o•In,l .dohwin h , e la .e ln . ivy" hinny • iN,Vi of 100101 Calame4,00 .1 non 74^41774^41710•00nl Intl,•town.w •1 70'07 n. k a• a"Si n"" 1. tInt1 1N ,,chard 0 weld ow hilly SHOP; , two Tenth!wee,IMeM Iwo,. 10.0'1)" wog 143 is area a ' IWIh -s w... 7015 11 M SVI a 140 loo: thence • Iryt. Mt .la"Wig" nnn0 1a Mmw"am 'matt 04144 a well 040.0f 01 the .4.0.0,4 ,aunt nl Mew.Sawn"1'111111 rest I . S"°""" 11 Mmw On•N,M 3 fen 47 71 Ivy Ina runt on qt Mum 101F feel la the . n r•Ing at 09,4,in,a •e Milano 1 6rahmM: 00 1.•, nl01 let win , 1f ins .,n01ns in , two, M.M00' 100 e01 Me, runic ...n n.^ old Muth •041.1 o war Von .a, It n•h•-•1. qe. ••• non, MM 00064545 bolo to, web, Cnun Mt of• r On.If in if 1h* orni l, • pan 110.104.7 II: lhene• 11ena h4•Ine • radius of 1 1 w,. Fla I1na %sums 00,4016 01]00 re va: I eenwl wow of Wra 2.44.Is 40'1: lhene• 110,10•In 00.0 aS rho/ or wan14 n 1 NbOM' Welt 101 Win.ilt (' bees, Me tell F+n)0'I I ' 611., 00.0"1 W.t1 •la 16 /.ilwr•0n^t.to Iei.; fns: 'Sof. .Into tilt •• It I Snuw 1111111s t foot Is 72 Intl twee S. 11.•, ,wnl a.,d 111. •pains nn 1h* •••• IM Wee h el 000.0 a 1•euI nI 00.40 Mn•• e• Seu.hw.r earl...O'region In (MOO wig* 61 34411'. Own! mania Snah 0'•,e.e' Weal of ewe Ni hone touts 1011,71" ,., .t feet In IN Sawhwll wo. . '1 Wool 17101 . i • M•MMI Of r •I e, Seolwn ]ry wen, 70 S" 4111' tan, St4111 10111MdM Swill.pa 0001 44" Wei l. 20.21'01' Welt ails• ,43 2.11 feel M a arm on way Seaw ' *owl 030011N e,al•twin M 11IM/•.LIry Ono al Still ' a Ihe jell lead.al to haying • 11 Mlahgt MgNI Si: Ih n •Iw a 011 11116 a fin MM sin.eon SmithClef 901; tl attle 'lI 1h* t IIy1• •11007701 third 0•ell 45933450 Clef9e1 7Mnfe Inlh , • Ire Wow 'owls 1040)7" Wool 4592'S Will 5277 fill t Ihwae , II)n tell I Ikon, el 11111 cog is„e 01•ow,.sIt•••••,, . , del: Owned. Rooh 4010•514- none nay, Mygen a 1.n41e 01 , WHI 31111 Iasi, 1Nnf• ii•.al 3440 feel. 1645(1O( Mee of I "Mg I.. "Gaol "^" el fh! 4. s11", eh••d of IW Mt Mon Soab•a gull.. 0l illI 3! Sons% •"•!Teti" Weal ]11.]5 • Mww 19Tia1' Waal 1111 DI M•0 a i.u,h If 7014, Ines; Men Sage Mtn%00100far Fn' thyme. tee,h .hMt01' W•1 , r1a61wr t•ton Saute eat-I. el;) tan, .Nat, Mae II, .tied• al It Sargon II; IFwe• ariaff' W1I1 134a la 11111 •M.nglng North 1145100" Ia•, • Scum, 44101'- wise 164• hum g•e1S 111,41 feel, *Penes Ni••••th ' 1 00.0100- ego M s 2474 10 "err Waal Weal 4100••••;;IMntI e• ' ww Oral." 1••• 44,• Wan.419);1' Woe 0112 In,: • t • nI M6"°"" a o n,own• l f 1MMMorn1 Mn P9 I,' WNI , .I•lwW M IM10•1-,10•1-, 145h Ilea 100"lull" 1401.00 g , 4• 91u11, ebng• i 451 '010 M( • 0.01W•••a 0' W • •41.30 loot •h0 i•ngl.M 0f 70.0411. thong Mann •OM'M" Weal 0 404 Mt ban Natw t.n.s '' $100 1614: I North ll .▪ 10.11 awl) • 6•..456" .e warier Well .66.11 Set, 11411 M•n OMao Mte1n 1 Snwn 514.00' Wl!M Frl'Ot" fool 0111 1.641 metre, INn .Mat. SG,,,,, lam.Moll 1h*we a•aura is 104e1I" Woo !Oil 42 Iel I PM loll(.11 1 Se"IV.", a m1 .MMI 4.41; 011'0' WSW Mw of 10011th1 ley I nitre .1104 Met: 4 Mar I •.r5 a Awl 12, these s1 end 40'4( 0' W 0ea11N iWl1 w t ao. "eta a01w 21 7111 Man; 1001121 W061 1011.4] N W III Intl•deer• if •'•a Mel M•palm 0••••••• • hap twee(myth 004044 th(10 en, MM5 eon/ M. let it•I 0 51014 Ma I.IN M1w' VON 0 , w 4h* O.M lams $.a 44•- fMIolNM 1000 atvl t woI!•••a aST000 Ma,s 1 MI5 a low, s1Mn4 ,Mm a Witter, enwe , 16016 0/tCw1b0• 01014 wt Mw" MMh Onkeaat Wol aa.N Oa m the 4 IN1n .aI . of• Ewa a long,4• IM1 gel a ION 1X41111 In , 1671 SF e•M 41 0 Wo1 I. II 1400454 11, .....dart Maw40 514211 al M 2 Ou111 WW1 County Mt•Nq wane. , • wool 1a Menh Pnt a Mr11Ma Malley(4Y swan•••4••7hI t I. I we 3 a mewl! I Sank sloe 4s'y M,n.M. 37 aloe ,.let. a thin. IN IM in"' Se 4Y••oi 1f ii11 Intl ;•g 61 Seaton" 1• 21 way It. M n11•N1a• Nwo,: ter; I •C 2 ON•••••aolt•11 Wet 049010' W4I 4)112 feet; , Weldi 415 Use "a.'" 1068•• IMM Now .19110_ Will WN Cowl,. C,4Omna brit 300,00 lea( IMne" Menu wow ostO•O ly eenlM/ I. 001•10" w MN" E•4 41.10 MM 11001, M.Mnwil tamer *MI 2045.• C•woeM1 0 we Manhww ....ameni. 3.a;6 716452 ,M w 4f ewe..W.'Anne* a,W. •won • eve 145 a5M..l..0y , wed Wei'I II."".net 4lla 1h*It Vow Menn,Mabee 12; Nave 00040 Cr Wes. 2N.I) Inn, owl, meows,' W011 0W••••M oat M 11!11,lbw 107.19 1011 10 • plhl an 1h• 11 Ma Itrn4•el "40,,10 0 .enh lino If Nld NnIM 34 IIH 1.34 NMS,"411000 Cal ..14 MO 1t4M11e1 40141 al !2h*1151„•4h*MM WNI 410 161451• Nit Meth IS.M• mad.q Mw lit W11 N•S1')e• Na 4"03.01 Ion; Cowry ROM M4411.r 0 aN is g North 000.'30' Men • 14191 0l tlelmdng• 000 en )O.0O••••le•wing ng an IM Muth Mira OP PWIK ofloll 1 Me W0000' 1•e 410.0 my One 5111 sing 12741'pro "nth tr.', IMne• Slush min.ng etja Mw.el 12: 1 MRe t M hovel' "WO 1101 w• WOO OE Son ,n ft fe 0 y(. •h*4u MM%Mun1.a..Iy NN IMwe M 1.41MN 0 M Town al row,Owyhee es turn le we ...Owen. /anew, 1 I:EV C JC :, jY 030289 15—DPT—EX [95s !AY - 1 t 2: 31 TELEPHONE FORM 906 STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 CLE;;,c DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION TO THE 8O&?9 DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING DENVER, CO 80203 .NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF EXEMPTION IN THE MATTER OF: First Christian Church NOTICE NO. 88-34 P.O. Box 542 FILE NO. 62_01_141_02 Windsor, CO 80550 COUNTY Weld PARCEL NO. 080721225013 CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: WIN 23129 L6 B1 22 / 609 Elm. A REVIEW OF THIS PROPERTY PURSUANT TO COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 39, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 117 (3) HAS REVEALED THAT THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR CONTINUED EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION*. THE LISTED OWNER AND THE ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE NAMED COUNTY ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT SUCH PROPERTY MUST BE PLACED ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL AS TAXABLE EFFECTIVE May_1?. 11tg *Reason for Revocation: Property is no longer used as a parsonage. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS 19th DAY OF fnril , 19 89 . .. . MARY ANNE MAURER PRO ERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR (SEE REVERSE FOR APPEAL RIGHTS) COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NOTter IF RtcWrt Awn REjPONSIB1tIT1t5 itica TO APPEAL Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, Title 39. Article 2, Sec 117 (5) provides. 'an appeal from any decision of the Property Tax Administrator may be taken by the Board of County Commissioners of the county wherein such property is rotated, or by any owner of taxable property in such county, or by the owner of the property for which exemption is claimed if exemption has been denied or revoked in full or in part. Any such appeal shall be taken to the Board of Assessment Appeals, and shall be taken no later than thirty days following the decision of the Property Tax Administrator.' Forms and instructions for making such appeal may be obtained from the Board of Assessment Appeals, Department of Local Affairs, 420 State Centennial Building, 13I3 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203. Telephone (303) 866.5880. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MENPT PROPERTY OWNER Owners of property granted exemption by this office must do the following to maintain their property's exemption from taxation: I. Notify this office yithin thirty dart of any change of mailing address. or status or usage of the exempted property (i.e., land has been sold and/or vacated and is no longer used). Property transferred by deed will be returned to the tax roils :y the county assessor. II. Etch year following the year in which exemption is granted. ownert of such exempt property must file an annual Exempt Property Report on or before April 15. These reports are supplied ty :-e Division of Property Taxation early each year. Thr ,liviiign If prop* v Taxation takety° resnpnsihllity fnr r.nnr7S nqr #47•.' el +n tr fnr Inv r !pn_ It is the responslbillty of t,e exempt property owner to see that these reports are received. completed and returned to the Division of Property Taxation annually by April 15, and with the appropriate filing fees. Contact this office if your reports are not received in time for completion by the April 1S deadline each year. On all future correspondence regarding this property, the owner shoulc r_%er to the file number shown on this determination. 0TNNTC WELD cor :iY 198; MAY -1 P71 't: 03 AGENDA TO THE Boiezio WELD COUNTY COUNCIL May 3, 1989 7:30 P.M. Centennial Center First Floor Assembly Room ROLL CALL: Norman Carlson, President Doris W. Williams, Vice President Marion Richter Frank Stewart Harold Fahrenbruch MINUTES: Approval of minutes of April 5, 1989 APPOINTMENTS: 5/6/89 (Tentative) Road & Bridge Tour 5/8/89 Elected Officials Meeting at 10:00 A.m. , Room 316 5/17/89 Board Meeting Appearance at 9:00 A.m. , 1st Floor ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: Correspondence (marked by *) CORRESPONDENCE: Memo: From Pat Persichino, Personnel Director regarding Education Benefits Memo: John Roccaforte, Information Services regarding Computer password changes Work Session Minutes of Commissioners: 4/10/89, 4/17/89 REPORTS: Elected Officials Meeting of 4/10/89 (Carlson, Stewart and (Williams) OLD BUSINESS: Continuation of Home Rule Charter Amendments - Articles VI through X Continuation of Elected Official Salary Discussion NEW BUSINESS: Payment of Bills: Mileage for Norman Carlson $ 32.00 Mileage for Marion Richter $ 13.20 Mileage for Doris Williams $ 44.00 Mileage for Frank Stewart $ 13.60 Mileage for Harold Fahrenbruch $ 21 .60 Loveland Reporter-Herald Newspaper $ 78.00 PUBLIC COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 P.M. 6, ,ate 5,3-gC 4 • • ��SS COr. HighvvaylobzRS , 2 U js Colorado Department of Highways :� LER 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, Co. 80222 0 ' THE BOARD For More Information: 757-9228 *89-16 APRIL 20. 1989 PUBLIC HEARING ADDRESSES MINORITY CONTRACTING PROGRAM State Highway Commissioners held a public hearing in Denver on April 19 to determine the effects, if any, of a recent U.S. t a Supreme Court decision on the Colorado Department of Highways iq Ys minority business enterprise program. The federal government sets a goal of 10 percent for awarding road and bridge construction contracts to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises . At question is the state package of goals, which for years has called for a 15 percent Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) goal and six percent Womens Business Enterprise (WBE) goal. In City of Richmond v J .A. Croson Company (Richmond) , the city was forced to scale back its own program. The Supreme Court set up specific criteria which a state or local government must meet in order to establish an MBE/DBE program. Colorado Highway Commissioners sought hard, personalized, specific evidence regarding current discrimination experienced by individuals in the Colorado highway construction industry. Commissioners heard more than four hours of oral testimony and accepted written testimony for the record . At the close of the hearing it was decided to extend the period for accepting written testimony ten days, based upon specific requests for details voiced by commissioners during oral testimony. A decision on Colorado' s program could be made at the June 15 State Highway Commission meeting held in Denver . The May 19 meeting is scheduled in Alamosa during the course of a weekend Spring Road Trip by chartered bus which will tour southwestern Colorado. (over) _ f Highway News Page 2 CONSTRUCTION BIDDING ACTIVITY FOR APRIL 20 IR 70-1(112 NEW REST AREA NEAR RIFLE Construction of a NEW REST AREA northeast of the Rifle/I-70 interchange , work elements include grading. aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, drainage, signing. striping, lighting. plant mix seal coat, landscaping. sprinkler system, curb and gutter, sidewalk and comfort station, in Garfield county. Number of bidders: Three (3) minority business enterprises Apparently successful bidder: $1, 273, 934 from K.E.C. I . Colorado, Inc. of Lakewood Calls for completion within: 100 working days Preconstruetion Project Manager: Shiu C. Chan Resident engineer : Jerry Jackson. Grand Junction MP 99-1000-19 I-79 ¢ S.H_ 71 TN ELBERTs_ LINCOLN & WASHINGTON COUNTIES Machine patching which includes hot bituminous pavement overlay, located on I-70 beginning about 8 miles southeast of Agate and extending eight miles southeasterly, also located about 2O miles south of Last Chance on S.H. 71 and extending about 19 miles north, in Elbert, Lincoln and Washington counties. Number of bidders: Ten (10) Apparently successful bidder: $305, 855 from Connell Resources. Inc. of Fort Collins Calls for completion within: 15 working days Resident engineer : John Goetzcke, Limon MP 11-0121-72 W SWORT} BLVD, ,IN JEFFERSON- COUNTY Resurfacing Wadsworth Blvd. starting at Colfax Ave. and extending about one and a half miles north to West 32nd Ave. in Jefferson county, work elements include planing, hot bituminous pavement overlay and striping. Number of bidders: Seven (7) Apparently successful bidder : $158, 666 from The Brannan Sand & Gravel Company, of Denver Calls for completion within: 10 working days Resident engineer : Gary Self, Denver (more) • Highway News Page 3 DIAS TO BE OPENED POSTPONED: The bid opening for a combined project to build bridges and approaches at the Interstate 76, Interstate 25 junction north of Denver was postponed April 13 . Project I 26- 1( 137) , 1 76-1(127 ) bids will instead be opened at 10 a .m. Thursday, May 4 . NEW: MAX 11, 9 : 30 A.M. , U.S. 550 realignment and bridge replacement in Ouray county which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, plant mix seal coat.,. drainage, bridge, striping, topsoil , seeding, mulching, And guardrail , beginning about seven miles north of Ridgway and extending half a mile north, BRF 550-2(17) . 2:45 A.M. Interstate 70 resurfacing for eight miles west of Cedar Point interchange in Elbert county, consisting of hot bituminous pavement overlay, plant mixed seal coat, signing, striping, seeding and mulching, CXIR 34-0070-03 . QQNTRACTS AWARDED Road/ Bid Contract Protect §irs Description Awarded to Opening, Awarded CX 12-0025-23 i-25 in Resurfacing Siegrist Const. 3/23/89 4/17/89 Thornton & Company Northglenn $1,263,223 Award Goals WBE 4% Committed WBE 4.38% MP 99-2000-20 S.H. 96 near Resurfacing HLM Construction 4/13/89 4/17/89 Eads & U.S. Inc. 160 near $120,810 Springfield Zero Coals (over) 4. Highway News �� Page a ILL JUST B '{ , CE . . MYSELF WITH THE STEERING WHEEL! r : Vii, / Ill • '�d•4 • "kk♦4. a �., 'i �Y. �,�^` ° . Ott'^. ` +Y • �.y 441 kg.t L ♦I { 'l I . ' P'• . • Who are you trying to fool?There's no way a steering wheel can stop you from slamming into a dashboard.Only a safety belt can. stop making excuses and start buckling your safety belt. YOU COULD LEARN A LOT FROM A DUMMY. BUCKLE YOUR SAFETY BELL A hMa Neva.Misr..ann aAmts./wet DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Cases Approved by Administrative Review 4/21/89 through 4/28/89 CASE NUMBER NAME ZPMH-1542 Shaw 2PMH-1546 Hoard RE-116E McCarty Weld Farms Chu unliffe, Director RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MAY 3, 1989 TAPE #89-18 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, May 3, 1989, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro—Tem Commissioner Gene R. Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Weld County Attorney, Thomas 0. David Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of May 1, 1989, as printed. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, and it carried with Commissioners Kirby and Kennedy abstaining because they were excused from said meeting. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. PRESENTATIONS: RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - DONALD E. KING: Chairman Kirby read the Certificate into the record and presented it to Don King, who is retiring after 24 years with the Road and Bridge Department. RECOGNITION OF SERVICES - IVAN ROSENBERG: After reading the Certificate into the record, Chairman Kirby presented it to Ivan Rosenberg. Mr. Rosenberg has worked for the• Road and Bridge Department for the past ten years. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS: Paul Stoddard, Coroner, was not present to give his scheduled report. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $273,593.09 Payroll 11,031.53 Social Services 3,408.13 Handwritten warrants: Payroll 46,689.61 Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. BIDS: PRESENT REMOVAL AND STUMPING OF TREES - ROAD & BRIDGE DEPT: Mr. Warden read the names of the bidders into the record and said this is to be considered for approval May 17. A short discussion followed concerning this bid item. PRESENT 3/4 TON PICKUP - HEALTH DEPT: Mr. Warden read the names of the bidders into the record for this item. He said that, due to the necessity of ordering this pickup, this may be considered for approval on May 10, rather than May 12, as listed. APPROVE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - BUILDINGS & GROUNDS DEPT: Tim Willoughby submitted a memo recommending that the bid items be awarded as follows: Century Papers, Inc. - Items 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 15, 22, 31, 32, 33 and 53 for $5,690.26; Nationwide Papers - Items 14 and 16 for $5,547. 16; Northern Colo. Papers - Items 3, • 4, 10, 20, 23, 25-A, 26-A, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57. 58, 59, 61 and 64 for $3,244.99; Zellerbach Papers - Items 8, 17, 18, 19, 24-A, 43 and 51 for $1,660.09: Columbine Paper and Maintenance Supply Co. - Items 5, 6 and 21 for $507.00; Huntington Labs, Inc. - Items 12, 36, 60, 65, 66, 67 and 68 for $402.00; Porter Supply Co. - Items 11 and 63 for 5329.47; and Colorado Chemical Co. — Item 62 for $60.00. (A list of all items is attached.) Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the recommendation in total. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVE MOWING/HERBICIDAL - EXTENSION: Ron Broda, County Pest Inspector, recommended that the herbicide spraying for Districts 1 and 2 be awarded to AAA Weed Control; and the spraying in District 3 to Vegetation Services. Mr. Brodaa recommended that the Board not accept either of the two spraying bids submitted for Districts 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 because he feels the amounts bid are too high. After discussion, Mr. Broda said he would amend his recommendation to state that the herbicide spraying for Districts 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 be awarded to Hutchison Pest Control • on an as-needed basis. Concerning the mowing, Mr. Broda recommended that the low bid from Peregoz & Sons be accepted for all 8 weed districts. Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the amended recommendation for the herbicide spraying and the recommendation for the mowing. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Minutes - Nay 3, 1989 Page 2 1 APPROVE ACOUSTICAL PANELS/BOOKSHELVES - HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT: Walt Speckman, Director of the Human Resources Department, submitted a memo recommending that the bid from Markley Office Concepts, Inc. , in the amount of $13,373.87, be accepted. Mr. Speckman's memo states that he did not recommend either of the two low bidders because their bids did not meet specifications. Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the bid from Markley Office Concepts, Inc. as recommended. Seconded by Commissioner Brantner, the motion carried unanimously. BUSINESS: OLD: CONSIDER COLLATERAL AND PLOWING PERMIT #89-2 FOR DELWYN NORTHUP AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN (CONT. FROM 4/19/89) : This item was considered after New Business. NEW: CONSIDER RENEWAL REQUEST FOR 3.2Z BEER LICENSE FROM CARL F. SEALEY, DEA SUPERIOR SUPERETTE: Lt. Steve McGuirk, representing the Sheriff's Department, said there have been no problems at this establishment during the past year. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the renewal of the 3.2Z Beer License for Carl F. Sealey, dba Superior Superette. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER '89-90 JTPA MASTER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Jeannie Tacker, representing the Department of Human Resources, said this Contract concerns the expending of funds and the operational activities under the Job Training Partnership Act. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve said Master Contract and authorize the Chairman to sign. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Brantner, carried unanimously. CONSIDER PY 'S9 JOB SERVICE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Ms. Tacker presented this item to the Board. Following discussion, Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this matter to the meeting of May 8. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION OF LEGAL ACTION TO COLLECT COSTS OF WEED SPRAYING - LLOYD LIBSACK: Tom David, County Attorney, explained that this is a contract collection against Mr. Libsack. Commissioner Lacy moved to authorize the County Attorney to proceed with legal action for the collection of the costs of weed spraying on Mr. Libsack's property. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, and it carried unanimously. OLD: CONSIDER COLLATERAL AND PLOWING PERMIT #89-2 FOR DELWYN NORTHUP AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN (CONT. FROM 4/19/89) : Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, said he advised the Sterling Production Credit Association that the form of the Letter of Credit, in the amount of $2,040.00, which it submitted for Delwyn Northup, was not acceptable. He said another Letter of Credit is to be submitted in the correct form. Mr. Barker recommended approval of the Plowing Permit, subject to the receipt of a correct Letter of Credit. Commissioner Lacy moved to accept the recommendation in total. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson, the motion carried unanimously. Minutes - May 3, 1989 Page 3 PLANNING: ZPMH #1543 - CACTUS HILL RANCH: Brian Bingle, representing the Department of Planning Services, said this request from Cactus Hill Ranch is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. Mr. Bingle said the Planning staff recommends approval, subject to four Conditions. Nels Nelson, representing the applicant, came forward to answer questions of the Board. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve ZPMH #1543, subject to the recommended Conditions. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Lacy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS - O.F.T. INCORPORATED; CABRERA; AND LOMELA: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against O.F.T. Incorporated; Jose G. and Marie Cabrera; and Donfilo Lomela for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:30 A.M. APPROVED: ATTEST: el727 e-tAtlt4t,nJ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder G, l , and Clerk to the Boar C.W. Kirby, Cha an ---)) . . Deputy County C erkqu 1 e John n, Pro-Tem ene R. Brantr T .2-sccr ir George Ken edy �., Gordo / " J �=AC4fL'ty �' /� Minutes - May 3, 1989 Page 4 mEm®RAf1DUm T, Pat Persichino 5-1-89 COLORADO From Tim Tim Willoughby, Custodial Foreman CO subject: 1989 Janitorial Supply Bid These are our recommendations for vendors to be awarded bids from the 1989 janitorial supply bid. Century Papers, Inc: Item no's. - 1,2, 7,9, 13, 15,22, 31,32,33,53. Total Bid Selections = $5,690.26 Nationwide Papers: Item no' s. - 14,16. Total Bid Selections = $5,547. 16 Northern Colo. Papers: Item no's. - 3.4 ,10 , 20,23,25-A,26-A,27,28,29,30, 34, 35,37,38., 39, 40,41,42,44 ,45,46,47,48 ,49,50,52, 54,55 .56,57,58 , 59,61,64. Total Bid Selections = $3,244. 99 Zellerbach Papers: Item no's. - 8,17 ,18,19,24-A,43,51. ' Total Bid Selections = $1, 660. 09 • Columbine Paper and Maintenance Supply Co: Item no' s. - 5,6,21. Total Bid Selections = $507.00 Huntington Labs Inc: Item no 's. - 12,36,60,65,66, 67,68. Total Bid Selections = $402.00 Porter Supply Co: Item no' s. 11,63. Total Bid Selections = $329.47 Colorado Chemical Co: Item no - 62. Total Bid Selection = $60.00 Total amount of awarded items = $17,440.97 1989 JANITORIAL BID SELECTIONS ITEM 41 . SCOURING CLEANSER : LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $.422/UNIT, `650.64 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 42. STAINLESS STEEL CLEANER : LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $1 .40/ UNIT,$;34. 12 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 43. CITRUS SOLVENT DEGREASER : LOW BID IS THE "A" BID FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $1 1 .96/UNIT, $23.92 TIL BID SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 04. DEODORANT BAR HAND SOAP : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.1390/UNIT, $94.50 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW DID. ITEM 45. PINI< PEARL HAND SOAP : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $2.31 /UNIT, /$471 ,24 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS FROM COLUMBINE PAPER AT $ '.35/UNIT,479.40 TTL BID BECAUSE COLUMBINE WILL SUPPLY DISP. FREE OF CHARGE WITH PURCHASE OF SOAP FROM THEM. ITEM 46. FROS'T:f LEMON DISINFECTANT HAND SOAP : LOW BID IS FROM COLUMBINE PAPER AT $2.30/UNIT, $27.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 47. AEROSOL FURNITURE POLISH: LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $1 .37/UN]:T, X6131 .52 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS LOW BID. ITEM ,r<'3. LIQUID OIL FURNITURE POLISH: LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $1 .976/EA, $23.64 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 09. CARPET SWEEPER : LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $26.04/UNIT, $260.40 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 410. CARPET SWEEPER REPLACEMENT BRUSHES: LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $7.15/UNIT,$85.80 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 411 . CLARKE 500 VACUUM LINERS: LOW BID IS FROM PORTER SUPPLY AT $4.90/UNIT, $313.60 TTL B.T.D. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 412. TUFF AND TIDY CARPET MATTING : LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $123.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM a$13. AEROSOL CHEWING GUM REMOVER: LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $2.06/UNIT, $24.72 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 414. TOILET PAPER: LOW BID IS THE "A" BID FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $28.21/CS, $5077.80 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SECOND LOW BID FROM NATIONWIDE PAPER AT $28.59/CS, $51 46.20 TTL BID BECAUSE THE SAMPLE WAS SO THIN YOU COULD SEE THROUGH IT AND IT FELL APART WITH JUST A FEW DROP'S OF WATER. ITEM 41 '3. MULTIFOLD PAPER TOWELS: LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $33.80/ CS, $4857.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 016. INDUSTRIAL WIPERS : LOW BID IS FROM NATIONWIDE PAPER AT $0358/ WIPE,400.96 TTL BID. SELECTED DID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 417. 04 SANITARY NAPKINS: LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $.085/ UNIT, $148.75 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 41;3, 43 SANITARY NAPKINS: LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $.09/ UNIT, $67.a0 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 419. TAMPONS : LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $.072/UNIT, - • $180 .00 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 020. TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER SPINDLE: LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $3.66/UNIT,$43.92 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 421 . GEORGIA PACIFIC CORMATIC SOAP DISPENSER: SELECTED BID IS COLUMBINE PAPER,THEY WILL PROVIDE DISPENSERS FREE BECAUSE WE ARE PURCHASING HAND SOAP FROM THEM. ITEM 422. 14"X10"X15" TRASH CONTAINER : LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT 92.57/UNIT,$2 .7O TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW - BID. - ITEM 423. 44 GALLON MOBILE CONTAINER CADDY BAG : THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $10.34/UNIT,941 .36 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW DID. ITEM 424. LARGE TRASH LINERS : THE LOW BID IS THE 'B' BID FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT #.03504/UNIT, X61 081 .20 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SECOND LOW BID OR THE "A' BID FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $.04034/ - UNIT, $1225.20 TTL BID BECAUSE THE LOW BID SAMPLE WAS A HIGH DENSITY LINER AND WE FOUND SEVERAL OF THE CASES OF THE HIGH DENSITY LINERS WE HAD ):N 1988 HAD ABOUT ONE-THIRD OF THE LINERS SPLIT DOWN ONE SIDE. ALSO THE CCMMENTS FROM THE CUSTODIANS ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HIGH DENSITY LINERS WERE MOSTLY NEGATIVE. - ITEM 425. MEDIUM TRASH LINERS:THE LOW BID IS THE 'A" BID FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.0337/UNIT, $10i1 .00 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 026. SMALL TRASH LINERS: THE LOW BID IS THE "A" BID FROM NORTHERN - COLO. PAPER AT $.013416/UNIT, 9402.4;3 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. - ITEM 427. FINE SCOURING PADS : THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT - $. 13/UNIT,$10.80 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 23. HEAVY DUTY SCOURING PADS: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER -_ AT $.25/UNIT , $15.00 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 027. SPONGE WITH SCOURING PAD BACK : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLD. PAPER AT ?x.32/UNIT, 951 .20 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. - ITEM 430. DOODLE SCRUB AND STRIP PAD: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.48/UNIT, $9.o0 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 431 . COUNTER BRUSH: THE LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $1 .£32/UNIT, - $32.76 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. - ITEM 0:32. CORN BROOMS: THE LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $2.40/UNIT, $43.20 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM t33. 24' MEDIUM PUSH BROOMS : THE LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $7.85/UNIT,$125.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. AMMOOMMEIMMMWMMIMMMMMEMM ITEM ::434. 24" MEDIUM PUSH BROOMS: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $8. 19/UNIT,$49. 14 TTL BID . SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 435. UTILITY BRUSHES : THE LOW DID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $1 .39/UNIT, $25.02 TTL.. BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS LOW BID. ITEM 036. DOODLE BUG PAD HOLDER : THE LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $1 .98/UNIT, $3.96 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 437. THREADED HANDLES: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLA. PAPERS AT $1 .55/UNIT, $37.20 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS LOW BID. ITEM 433. WETMOP HANDLES : THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT ?3.30/ UNIT,$91 .20 TTL BID. THE SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 439. KLEENRXTE ROLLOMATIC SPONGEMOFS: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $10.58/UNIT, $126.96 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 440. 24 OZ COITTON WETMOP HEADS : THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $1 .OS/UNIT,$22.55 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 441 . 20 OZ UNFLAYERED RAYON WETMOP HEADS: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $2.43/UNIT, $29.76 TT!_ BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 442. KLEENRITE ROLLOMATIC SPONGEMOP REFILL: THE LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $4.84/UNIT, 1;58.08 TTL BID'. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 443. 15" WHITE POLISH PADS : LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $.96/UNIT, $4.80 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 444. 17 ' WHITE POLISH PADS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO, PAPER AT $2.03/UNIT,$40.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 445. 17" RED BUFFING PADS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $?.03/UNIT, $?1 .05 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 446. 15" BLUE SCRUBBING PADS: LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $i .69/UNIT, $8.45 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 4847. 17" BLUE SCRUBBING FADS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $2.03/UNIT, $40.60 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM : 48. 17" BLACK STRIPPING PADS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $2.03/UNIT,430.4'5 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 4„49, RUBBER GLOVES SIZE 7 1 /2 - 3 1/2: LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.54/UNIT, $1 3.50 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 450. RUBBER GLOVES SIZE 9 - ii :: LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.S4/UNIT,$24.30 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 051 . NEOPRENE GLOVES : LOW BID IS FROM ZELLERBACH PAPERS AT $ .85/UNIT, $10 .20 TTL BID. SELECTED DID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 052. 1 QT.' SPRAY SPRAY BOTTLES : LOW BID IS THE "A' BID FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPERS AT $.19/UNIT, $50.35 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE "B" BID FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $.26/UNIT, $6£3.90 TTL BID BECAUSE THE "A" BID DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS. WE SPECIFIED A 32 Ox. BOTTLE AND THE "A" BID WAS FORA 22 OZ. BOTTLE. ITEM 45:3. TRIGGER SPRAYERS : LOW BID IS FROM CENTURY PAPERS AT $.36/UNIT, $'54.00 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 454. JR. FLIP UP DUSTERS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $5.59/UNIT,$67.03 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM =x'.55. SR. FLIP UP DUSTERS ; LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $8.43/UNIT,$101 .16 TTL BID, SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 456. DUSTPANS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLA. PAPER AT $1 .51 /UNIT, $36.24 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 457. 26 QT MOP BUCKET : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $18.06! UNIT,$10$.36 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 458. MOP WRINGERS : LOW BID IS PROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $35.85/UNIT, $236.80 TTL DID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 459. 10 QT. PAIL : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $2.10/UNIT, $16.80 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. - ITEM 460. TOILET BOWL MOPS : LOW BIDS WERE TIE BIDS FROM COLUMBINE PAPER AND HUNTINGTON LADS AT $.50/UNIT, $6.00 TTL BID. AWARD IS TO THE VENDOR WITH THE LOWEST TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT WHICH IS HUNTINGTON LABS. ITEM 461 . MOPWRINGEr SPRINGS : LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT X81 .95/UiNXT,$1 1 .70 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 062. TURKISH TOWELING : LOW BID IS FROM COLO. CHEMICAL AT $60.00 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM ;;63. PUMP SPRAYER; LOW BID IS FROM PORTER SUPPLY AT $15,87 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 064. BODILY FLUID CLEANUP KITS : THE LOW BID IS FROM NEW DAWN AT $4.57/UN:IT,$36.56 TTL BID. NEW DAWN WILL NOT ACCEPT BID OF ONE ITEM TOTALLING $36.56. SECOND LOW BID IS FROM NORTHERN COLO. PAPER AT $8.95/UNIT, $89.50 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS NORTHERN COLO. PAPER. ITEM 065. 4 ' X 6 ' U.S. FLAGS : THE LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $26. 17/UNIT,$52.34 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 466. 3' X 5' U.S. FLAGS : THE LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $17.54/UNIT,$87.70 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 467. 4 ' X 6' COLO. FLAG: THE LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $:35.83 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM 4:68. 3 ' X 5 ' COLO. FLAG : THE LOW BID IS FROM HUNTINGTON LABS AT $23. 13/UNIT, $92.52 TTL BID. SELECTED BID IS THE SAME AS THE LOW BID. ITEM m69. NO BIDDERS. ITEM WILL BE BID AT LATER DATE. 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Monday, May 8, 1989 Tape P89-18 & 89-19 ROLL CALL: C.W. Kirby, Chairman Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner George Kennedy Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of May 3, I989 ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR 1) Communication Services - Brantner REPORTS: 2) Engineering Services - Lacy 3) Health Services - Kennedy 4) Planning Services - Johnson 5) Purchasing & Personnel - Kirby COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Approve 3/4 ton pickup - Health Department BUSINESS: OLD: 1) Consider PY '89 Job Service Contract and authorize Chairman to sign (cont. from 5/3/89) NEW: 1) Consider renewal request for Retail Liquor Store License from Ronald Fahrenholtz, dba C J's Liquors 2) Consider I989 Purchase of Services Agreement between Migrant Head Start and San Luis Valley Board of Cooperative Services and authorize Chairman to sign 3) Consider Vacation of Right-of-Way in S34 and 535, T6N, R66W and two Deeds 4) Consider Purchase of Services Agreement with Jesse Vigil 5) Consider Computer Services Contract with City of Evans and authorize Chairman to sign 6) Consider Corrected Quit Claim Deed re: Ruth Place and authorize Chairman to sign 7) Consider Resolution re: Cancel Uncollectible Ambulance Accounts 8) Consider Resolution re: Temporary Closure of WCR 46 between WCR 55 and 57 9) Consider Resolution re: Appointments to Communications Advisory Board 10) First Reading of Ordinance Number 118-I, In Matter of Amending and Deleting Portions of Ordinances Numbers 118-G and 118-H, Weld County Personnel Policy Handbook, as Amended PLANNING: 1) Consider Resolution re: Building Code and Zoning Violations - O.F.T. , Inc.; Grimes; Golden Buckeye Petroleum; and Nunez • CONSENT AGENDA • APPOINTMENTS: Nay 8 - Work Session 10:30 AM May 8 - Mental Health Board 7:30 PM May 9 - Juvenile Community Review Board 12:00 NOON May 10 - EDAP 7:00 AM May 10 - Work Session 1:30 PM May 11 - Area Agency on Aging 9:00 AM May 11 - Budget Work Session 9:00 AM May II - Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee 10:00 AM May 12 - Community Corrections Board 12:00 NOON May 15 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 16 - E-911 Board 12:00 NOON May 16 - Planning Commission 1 :30 PM May 16 - Retirement Board 2: 15 PM May 16 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM May 18 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON May 29 - HOLIDAY - HEARINGS: May 10 - Show Cause Hearing. Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County _ Disposal, Inc. (cont. from 3/22/89) 10:00 AM May 10 - Tavern Liquor License, Henry L. Walker, dba Bears Sports Saloon 10:00 AM May 17 - Special Review Permit, Open-pit mine and materials processing facility, C & N Companies (Distel Farm Resources) 10:00 AM May 24 - Preliminary Hearing, Casa Grande/Enchanted Hills Local Improvement District 10:00 AM - May 31 - Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 10:00 AM - Jun 5 - Show Cause Hearing, Tatum (Cont. from 11/7/88) 9:00 AM REPORTS: I) George Goodell, Road and Bridge Director - Road Openings - COMMUNICATIONS: 1) City of Broomfield - Notice of Annexation 2) Board of Adjustment minutes of April 27, 1989 3) Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Notices of Hearings 4) Planning Commission minutes of May 2, 1989 5) Windsor Chamber of Commerce re: WCR 62 6) State Dept. of Highways Newsletter #89-17 7) State Dept. of Health — Letters of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage _ Sludge 8) County Council minutes of April 5, 1989 9) Board of Assessment Appeals re: Morning Fresh Farms, Inc. 10) Stephen V. Hill, Planning Adminstrator re: Monfort Annexation Revision 11) Nuclear Regulatory Commission re: Notification of NRC of Employee's Potential Safety Issues RESOLUTIONS: 1) Approve Collateral and Plowing Permit #89-2 for Delwyn Northup * 2) Approve Authorization of Legal Action to Collect Costs of Weed Spraying - Lloyd Libsack - * 3) Approve ZPMH #1543 - Cactus Hill Ranch - * 4) Approve authorization for County Attorney to proceed with legal action - - Building Code and Zoning Violations * 5) Approve temporary closure of WCR 46 between WCR 55 and 57 - * 6) Approve cancellation of uncollectible Ambulance accounts * 7) Approve appointments to Communications Advisory Board - * 8) Approve '89-90 JTPA Master Contract ORDINANCES: I) First Reading of Ordinance 118—I, In Matter of Amending and Deleting Portions of Ordinances Numbers 118-C and 118-H, Weld County Personnel Policy Handbook, as Amended * Signed at this meeting Monday, Nay 8, 1989 Ad RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION TO RECOVER COST OF CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL - LLOYD LIBSACK WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on or about June 18, 1988, Lloyd Libsack contracted with Weld County, through its Weed Control Office of the Cooperative Extension Service, to perform chemical weed control on certain property owned by him, and WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of the Board on May 3, 1989, the Board considered the matter of recovering the cost of said chemical weed control, and WHEREAS, Lloyd Libsack was neither present nor represented at the Board meeting of May 3 , 1989, and no objection was made in his behalf to the entry of this Resolution, and WHEREAS, the Board, at said meeting, determined that this matter be referred to the County Attorney to proceed with appropriate legal action against Lloyd Libsack to recover the cost of the chemical weed control in the amount of $694.77. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Weld County Attorney' s Office be, and hereby is, authorized to seek judgment against Lloyd Libsack to recover the cost of the above mentioned chemical weed control in the amount of $694. 77. 890396 / a Page 2 RE: RECOVERY OF COSTS - LLOYD LIBSACK The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: hu�+ll WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder A and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, C airman BY: ��yyrr��yr, y �' ., i e ' ne Joh on, Pro-Tem eputy County erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ene R. Br ntner .01 - ��/ . Gl-�- George e fr/ County Attorey 890396 COUNTY OF WELD NO. STATE OF COLORADO COMPLAINT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LLOYD LIBSACK, OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, vs. Plaintiff(%) Defendant%) 1. That Lloyd Libsack , Defendant , (is a) (aria) resident_ Ct Weld County, with Post Office addresses of 21601 Weld fnnnty RnAr1 40 , City of LA S„11A , State of Cntnradn- 2. That the amount claimed herein does not exceed $5, 000 .00, exclusive of interest and costs . 3. That the amount claimed from the above-named defendant , is $694.77 together with proper interest, costs and any other items allocable by statute or specific agreement. ftQRkx*Bktthtoexaxocxttx:gxxxi8xaFtxi£xioftcz*itomb:ixx)c:lithectcxecttxyteaSsuREt3cxpz292AU eckaicaedxfxmxoct.t ma.1,..4.w.:..-E...;dcx3.,,f....,5,..:.xxxicxxatix atetxxtx3cxexcafxaxxxxxxxx atxd>=ayxbiexibez= iC'lcxrocsaaaxboa sc 4. That such claim arises from the following event or transaction: (Set forth briefly the facts and circumstances giving rise to the action. Time and place are important and shall be sufficiently stated.) On or about June 18, 1988, the Defendant contracted with Weld County, through its Weed Control Office of the Cooperative Extension Service, to perform chemical weed control on property owned by Defendant in Weld County. On several occasions between June 28, 2988, and October 1, _ 1988, Weld County had the weeds treated with Banvel and 2, 4-D. (See Exhibi- = 5. That the defendant (is) 6tktcerlc not in the military service of the A. United States, and_insupport of this statement plaintiff sets forth the following facts: (State facts concerning military status of defendant(s) . If the military status of defendant(s) is not known, so state.) Defendant is present in Weld County and engaged in farming in Weld County 6 . That a jury trial is (not) demanded p 1-a t1/ Plaintiff' s Address: � �C / / 915 Tpnth S1-rPA* P n Rnx 75$ ‘,Plaintiff(sr or Atto . ey's Signature Greeley , ('nlnrpd.o -$n63? Attorney's Registration No. 8067 Telephone No.(303) 356-4000, Ext 4200 Address: 915 10th St - P. (1 Rnv 194$ Greelpv. Colorado 80632 Telephone No. 11011 1Sfi-4nnn ., Rvt 4191 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 My Commission expires: (Deputy Clerk) (Notary Public) (PLAINTIFF'S FILING FEE$16.00 plus $1.00 tax. IF JURY DEMAND IS MADE AN ADDITIONAL FEE OF $25.00 MUST BE PAID TO THE CLERK.) NOTE: In order to set a contested ease for trial fa case is not contested until a written answer has been filed),either party to this action may file a Notice for Trial Setting with the.Clerk of the Court,and must serve or mail a copy thereof to the opposing party at least six days before the date for trial setting, Such Notice shall state that the party wilt appear in open Court in Division "C" at 1:50 p.m.on a specified Tuesday or Thursday to set a time and datefor 7/82 trial. • Notice of Trial Setting forms may be obtained from the Clerk,if desired. 890396 KOOO'1 - - __.�. ./ • STATEMENT _ • . Date e,1?1!@° TO i 1rw/4 I ihea,.1, ADDRESS 91Fn1 id r a,+ nn CITY i acalln rr sync Payable to: WELD COUNTY WEED CONTROL 425 N. 15th Avenue • { : •, Greeley CO 80631 • 11 Ots Banvel @ $19.00/qt $ 209.00 . • 11 Qts 2,4-0 @ $2.85 ' 31.35 52.8 Oz Surfactant @ $.12 6.34 5.5 Acres Class I Laobr @ $30.00/acre 165.00 5.5 Acres Class III Labor @ $40.00/acre 220.00 Set up fee 30.00 5% Admin. fee 33.08, • i TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 694.77 EXHIBIT A 890396 RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1543 - CACTUS HILL RANCH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 3rd day of May, 1989 , considered the request of Cactus Hill Ranch for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A-Agricultural Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Part of the NWI , Section 16, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall apply for a building permit for the mobile home within thirty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; 2) A septic permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that North Weld County Water District is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use; and 4) The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with the above mentioned conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Cactus Hill Ranch for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. 7 Je j� Vin✓ 890392 Page 2 RE: ZPMH #1543 - CACTUS HILL RANCH The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of May, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder Gi//� and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kir y, airman J ine J nson, Pro-Tem eputy County C rk .ems APPR VED AS TO FORM: e e R. Brant er 9i-c .. `� George K County Attorney - 11 - Go ' , 890392 • To: Board of County Commissioners Date: May 3, 1989 LPYH-1543 Applicant: Cactus Pill Ranch This request is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling Legal Description of Parcel: Part of the NW} of Section 16, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor; south of State Highway 14 and east of State Highway 257 The Department of Planning Services staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the request be approved for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT X Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. ?: Be compatible with the surrounding area. X Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X Adversely affect the immediate arca. Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. COMMENTS: The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home within thirty (30) days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A septic permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that North Weld County Water District is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. • 890392 1 Board of County Commissioners May 3, 1989 Page 2 4. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with Conditions 1, 2, and 3 above. / / ert/��annex Date S90392 I 1.104.. T 9N. i ~�'• n `tS . . • ' I r \ �(� '.e . ."•.‘74,,,j\I rr r. ' \4-1.%4_, re r, I • C l �� mS a• g n p . t . t a• g 102.., s t r \ Aat.�. A 100. ; . . . - .- . .__, ._ ._ ._ _ :_ ._ _ .. . . _ z C. N ul v ny p V I a I w � A z•1'• F • a 1I , 1 3 "T I t •, p, .. .. . . 98... - scene I 1 •q•-••••• .. ' r C gr A C ; • p • h \ "? • 96... k p I\ rc t t. 0 •11 p �� p • p • e ti r q n• . `• +stI o r 94... _ — dr p��_ _9 J ` t \ r l t ,, / 111 • UUUppppU • r �/ UU.. r. II n 92.... T8N- �A Cr \ .'O \ p �1 . ` l' rC,F. o •. w � \ Ii • p g. r1 A tT.J r n w r u t.1n' a. C IS me, w •t 1• 1•• n r r. at p i1 G.. i !• t tl•i � y g 17au -b"r .cr ha `•A• n (•111• ' 88. ... _ 1 .• ••p ro.••e Y �� . of f y L: 1" zt, 11 4 Nil 0 CS 86.••. 7 I V' . L ••%I•—jo rIC `\-J'\ 'el•• .. 84.... ` r ...rt.. : rp •\ .. •..' to 1e • .� 5[D�} �5.tt—o' »• leer -/1AMr... \I ( k4 'T •\sib :�iviii; , . e ;C '• xBC .. ; ' •Q IW . ' • •./1 1 ` ' 5 • •L w� tw•• • al •� a• t re :e\ ... • ) • qYq so r (KC,. . .ti •s •• O 78.... :h... ' •� t c.e1 I Y' rj cJ.K• r rtLee a \ • FN`'w• ° qq G••• ('i" ,..aw: . • .rte -I::' „��:• — [^ ",• ' CS.-11 19 -,N a• n n \ I \ • • II ••. h _ •• Ap• it — -yl •—:: : S M1 t£[v[ n •.w •. 10 ' r3/4s,„,,,, .r a. ! �, a 74.... �-• 7 ..1 . _ 7.i.•. L,x ^, �: , :. -t-f.:1-r:t! ,�`1 i • ?4 di ! : 1JFr:T1} J mi Liw • 1? .' 1�• a^— :LC l. i-:•-•-0 \O.. . • w �p ti . • ,E-ore A • • ••••p•, o rr ' . . . 70. ay.Y�` 1. �` C. r.C . 1. •� .• :• •M.. � _ •• p -_ __rte �1, • • :. 5--- r ' • •68 p a d r 31 ^ �. i1� 'ate• . ti�i n •r u • w 7 • • u ,. 1 66.-. M ra r :• ''Fic•te... r n S.n.r C Y. • •` $� _ , ii >..) li ,v aks Q \it i% t "' }''. �_ V ��t. � " \ f_ ` r. JJ s'''• % -� P Imo) (J C (,/ 8 \ >` !/ '�`& �. 10 • /1 _� .�/ , / /�A 1 \\�� ) . , S. ----c\,\ a � \ • C � \'. `\' ..,,„ ) \ L. I , ',Vat 9 ---\\ ,c\\K-°;,:-4,577-' i o , , ( / ;' /K - -- '-- i- ,--,\,\ \ . 'N / c -4 r _ _II": CI, , \,\ A,-:,,, c.--c. i,..-- • JI) ii, C 7-1 , . ' �� 'I A 1) \ 4,—,-0/,' :r J : I 17 \\\l\ \'''\ r�16,,,o �e ,'' l U GQl2/tD - —N - �. r .� S t. 4 I rj,I• �\..--ma n . ..\ ._ n so II ` c c._I i✓ o 1 �� i: �� tBfevk 'allow.) 111 ry ` 1 ii �� x T - \1 •\� so4 \ ,1 bake i= .ory 7 7°,71 __.- 0 L. j--- LIt4i °° t v „, ,, ,, , \ . �� 1j �1'1— ' �� *�, -.+av , a9sC1� - -o ,Lv J• � [ fir / 1 t1M L��V N ,' ,`27 2 , ,:...,-:,..-"I';):-.-..--4,...-3.:,2"-• 1t '/• v i.1j t• 4,0A4. •-. t.�F yy'may_. t'/S• f'.^V+eYrr.lr h 'a hl ! + »r 2:'./' r `� 1 'b,.� ._ �1.�^P > .�s•R�"r•v,. v I ul ..r , r~' ,- I L reh w:-.� .I _ - r .*,�r� e i s� la • I-. 7'� A ..RIM. K{�1E i t w I • �I. I'\ X`a ,It 1, y ?w r wl �e��'y,t °w' '�9( 1♦ tote,� ' n a0 ...7' •, am r "l v.. '1-y^[^YI' .y '-•'ti ,f ' 4 ��V I. r .'. ! Jr " r•1 -�V'• '.- +err✓,♦ '+». rA 4,Sw• t y' K", • '«- w+ L ., `"• �rl\ n'/t-17 ••Vyt'rf w V t .t!r'.. .. 4( it S a'• ifr. .,.'— rat.- v f �3tpy4%41 h t. \" 5 44,'," ' ti' "1 ..IN'4 ��t'ti'\ - - t"!:-•i .a 2r".t' �'*2 +''... q.sl r " ♦.., .*A..,f iT-""`ly( .k 7`�t `--se--- /:,„,, n ) RR. ✓ J H r I ' -N IS...-. J d ♦ .� 1 t... -.it. \ _�„+ ,� 1WY yL•/ �[,,,a Yp � • �� • T N 1'MY �~.� y�¢� •- M•µrj , r { 9 `r'AW♦- • -1l. Y�(�... �4 X ,;,.,„,,,k. 1 (w 4.k,wwwr . rT � 'sfd •t ?y�C , M r� • F,. ,+..,r r '' `' A � �• 1J • Yd•+�y°y�f♦� •.' (" n t } r �,yy� p' 11'.., -Nar ✓ iw• •.• . / S . fl' • ‘'I:i'"{ 1 '.4R+lj f 'M. @t'4Ir K y, �R.w'�.«'rfl T",r'4• U/pi'4.••., .ley...^ 'y.�-• ' ' .. r Y9F•csy yynwx; � wt3r yK J r^a+1i(.. -•1 • • L`*tt ^ "*'; • a1r,\htf'wr v.w 'YN .en I4.arar 4,,t ',,is �• _ ... .- 71{y • rr1 h '`• J`;k :c• �•y; wl'�rpf,r r'" r. r 1 • I • ' _..:..s.- 1+�1 ♦l, IYw ],.�Y•' ., � rti= y ryG 1`1'e�Tri •e ~�. / S TI 1-.. . �� r� • � � ,� I'll +.w r } ' ' ' '' ° , ,„ r 1./,;.. ` , 44:,, \., 1It Ar II •n i Y \•I fr • •r... 4 r r/ SK -,, '/ �, .t ` f l.TL\� nv 4• R JM pctf. J ....tr. �fi /•:. ,ii\ .•'•^ . 14" .t I + •- ' • r►1r / .: �" r rt 4l TT J 'v \•1.-.•ji✓L • .. /�. ...c.•_•••-49.,.......'....-.- /t w� M �/,ter.. try r ut i f { _ \ M1lrz ,r . 'MZ �IL,.�.y • r„ a'NGi• .fir 7 1(\iu.'I�y.nV r �'.•'I� 1•"'. Y Jt\ y f/Ir•�1r1::,7"::„...... J %i • '� 1. •!...•••:' . .435,��,,�,,,.e #~ f ' 't/t"' • d ' �..p�r p .a,y.l r.. F.> y,;.1 f.• , el 'Si'.• 'IA.• k 1,``41 rI! _y\Y-•, •.�y�v• 94.E {{M''..TT .,� .;•,-i tCt \' r ) 7 } • n! n dl"""-��3-�.'I " 1. Sys a r •r..• ♦ 'i'•*40r ,r .S• r 4 d6] A, JF e ♦ 0. pppIII��5��;;;��., t' Y ';60 rr1t �(..•c ,.Y 4. .. � ,`+gl • ti "t.• �1;1 �w�` � J 4rYt '`_� - '4� fir. e. r` •yJ1 .. w•, r ; h t ,4' rr +:,9't .4 „..01. 't�,"'It �. '• ;, .I t`... M7'Q.'$ , • ` •c • 'Il. ____ ..v . ,, fr +rte I Jii • . r, ,C �p,�.``� i •'L'� . Y.I., I .., . 1 ''1p'F' .'r.-.e 4, 16111If I.F,1 'o /fy, itlS'':. • •y, •t•V �.d,r -{1`�'i I y �\ As 1[Rtr •'r.M1+s y, , Y '�'i!. J. `y • fr.: 3• V/(/ Y 1 1 '4 'Y' n•' !.•F. 890392 lSf ,, t 1: 7 � '` ..�.wq�J' r y '`c<t "{y'�n ‘,...... M2 _..�;. it.L*fR t,,, J•\ , Iz ...„e a .11 \ ' . I` �lX.i�l FIELD CHECK riling Number: ZPMH-1S43 Date of Inspection: April 13, 1989 Applicant's Name: Cactus Hill Ranch Request: Mobile home permit for a principal dwelling Legal Description: Part of the NW} of Section 16, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor, south of Highway 14, and east of Highway 257. Land Use: N Highway 14, farmland E Farmland S Farmland W FAA Tower, Highway 257 Zoning: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The property is approximately 160 Acres, more or less, used exclusively for agricultural production. Access to the property is off of Highway 14, a paved road having a minor arterial classification. The topography is a gentle incline to the south. ann 890392 u it I Y WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ZONING PERMIT 915 10th Street MOBILE HOME Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IMPORTANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT A LTLt 5 (4 ( LC- PHONE ��b fr." ca 2 2 fr ADDRESS 351cro (4 03 257 l t Loni-, s CO $O5zy OWNER PHONE ADDRESS CITY - STATE - ZIP 'LOT {BLOCK 'SUBDIVISION LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 p �W Section 14' , T 7 N, R G') W. Total Acreage /60 !_ Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board of County Commissioners Approval ❑ Temporary Use During Construction O Use Beyo d 18 months During Construction of a residence of a res ❑ Temporary Storage O Extensi jtj§� the for Temporary Storag 4/;;R `? �rtiy� Jr Accessory to Farm ❑ More an onA'mil fil9Accesa ) to Farm ❑ Accessory Use as an Office O More time one MH asce4 Use as ❑ Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Officg44, q4 4r " 0 Accessory Structure O More than one MH '8ft4.v essory Use in C or I Zone District ❑ Temporary Use during Medical Hardship O More than one accessory structure Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires an Application fee of $75.00 $125.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY ❑ Public or private company: 0 Public or private company: LkJav4'In I,de )c1 pf%Septic Tank - Permit # O Individual (well, cistern) Well Permit # Copy Attached: Yes ❑ No ❑ Cony Attached: Yes D No fl DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY ZONING DISTRICT 'ZONING PERMIT NUMBER a3 APPLICATION FEE PAID,,6OOIRECEIPT NUMBE 6 e/ar DATE gilt" rjC 1CHAINDERED // APPROVED BY: /1 O Staff O Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date LSSUEL BY: DATE MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED : . :... ... ., 890392 A sketch plan is required as part of the application review. Please attach a sketch plan of the site ac the scale on one inch represents fifty feet or other suitable scale to show the proposed location of the mobile home, including distances from the property lines and other structures on the property; access to the mobile home, indicating whether the access is existing or proposed; location and measurements of any easements or right-of-ways; and any existing structures on the property. Sketch Plan attached: Yes ' No O Deed or contract attached: Yes No What housing is available on the property and what is its present use? /UCLA How many mobile homes are on this property at the present time? TEMPORARY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENCE Building Permit Number Date Building Permit Issued Zoning Permit valid for 6 months from date of issue. Zoning Permit issued Valid from to RENEWALS: FIRST - From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved SECOND -From to Fee: Reviewed & Approved ACCESSORY FARM USE Type of farming operation on property: Number of Livestock ' Average number per year Acres Irrigated Acres Dryland Acres Pasture Number of employees now employed: Full time: Part time: ACCESSORY USE IN C OR I ZONE DISTRICT • Type of commercial or industrial activity on property: Number of employees: Full time Part time: Mobile home will be used for: rIGNATURE 0 APPLICANT l/� lt� / PLICATIO�I��Tk �l/C�'vS /tlll �/J /(1 1..7 C�' /fr PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL MOBILE HOMES IN ADDITION TO THE ZONING PERMIT FOR MOBILE HOMES. THE BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION, ROOM 342, CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915 10th STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO 80631, PHONE 356-4000 EXT. 4425, AFTER APPROVAL OF THE ZONING PERMIT. 890392 1.•l'h ir. ., • I NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION It 6 c.,..4-us 14111 tatlit 39970 N(CI y ZS7 Pr Lo Mkt Co S'tcay O7cc-/6-000-cta3 Cl+4 of •TGDef-to 4'jOC CtviL Ceder 17todn , Cc $0229 O7•09-1/6 - ace- D.SZ k S Ft� Le 3201 Sher€ ieca4 r#- ('o f Zinc (a gory) n9,a C- 11, - Ooo - oil l Jb - M11.e - c3“-0 14u1/4) 4 / 4e 1✓,‘ [.c/L„ls . (e) Jerzy ^ 70c- /&. - 000 - 0)2. Cuc..+us 2u,..c.1" 3tere fawy -S7 Fl- Cc 11 Ci &os-at ,,�� I / 07cc- 17-cco- 004 ) Joky, Kis n c '? k)h,sve P , Cewe, Grocvs�iel,9, Cc Scc VV O 'ns- O R-OoC -023 K a 1A Ce"pa,, ,, ztct SI.cre_ Ce4 Ft- Caglots, Co $°cty 07e F-Cer one-cot, • 8913392 u AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. 1/M —2AL The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /f day of * r.. l , 19e t. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: Notary Public 890392 0' e i •C j�yy t' f.�r�.3¢IG•'.roe ,M b.ASO-0d7'r', tca1557 rw, 4S9 r- —' ter . w.. r...w a. ..nc I j W 11.172207 r ' / LVAi1.SiAVtr MO A . THIs lKDtnvat,*.s.Or ha bed lay .U 60 .YN... CICTOS KILL RACK Carer, s •-peed ttwt D. Nal sad ASA K. SI I, • M a Cog l7x-ITL L. 1028$ aad DOIRi7A COW, Matta. • N `t of tM Colo)of Wi14 W.tor r Wand ,tw.rfrr gelled ..—..Ylr MY r w...,an.THC TlDCtAL LAND IAN 0r WICHITA.Wafts Ceara.M..f.iw tailed warea ., 9 VITNCMCTH ..n.Tat amid tw toatr.(n sod vorrai re et W Ow.f t l Ole avLna.TxOII8SRD IC x0/A00 (R100,000.DO) DOLLARS. 1 In hood MM by/aVYet.tarps of ord.r herby n%n..l.faS• as to edge wet .a.,nil r t e f.tewtt.r I .Ml nuts.arts I.the Coonly of told . lute.f Cacaos .trrtt M.Sal • • 1 _ r; , SL13terespt treat of *brat A aani b bf wI lass M Jae. • ' Lela Lsarfadr) of R.*tf*.211 SIVIorept Rr.t7eir old) at tattles 161 Mt of agi (Le to add WK at Water D.ytly tad t etpp C. —..,a Utah) of restla.16; rd 001 of dostlw 161 'i 1' all la?esaiiw 7 left. Rmmo bl Watt of t!s 64 e. x.; • 1 Cmtltlar h$ earn, .se•s age Ian. aeoaeellaw to t. II. E. ' ( Oowri sat barfly%Darnel T'epen tab 70btrae of stook of rot left Twain Irrigation — Cr wry h taros of Adak la tame Sete IkWlr ad Stamp daseay; al 230 tors fast af site la tie I atbor.CDlarade dater i Ceesawny District. • y . r, e t . , Taa.tM Mr Ml arltdror.Mearseera W.f ware..lrenwl.Wearer et lo my wit.sn.ri.W.rewire alt wan,'nitre W arrow Motto of every kir roe drntprn,hewer...teem/or aant.r tad.W.D nfttorf.wy, - masts ant ts. r fla a borrows tow ms.red in~worms then.it .whwhether.weed. .y CAM In Yam 4u.f this~Oa. — a.t►enah email. I Tats mine..Y ate..Mums.Or MTr+r of.pet...'w a ma Awe lmt.ttO marl by wormer to get. . • art..M the ember ed t1.00,00D.00 .rah Wont at W eatoof 6 nowt rot aura.eW.v1.lp4 NO - latw..i,rnrt palter Or ar n'Wige fen Is WDar s i. s..ler e briniesod MOW seller brinier s or fled IStx se _ rr•t has .1193 r sad floral!OMdS lled perwestoWOrrrrw.ratWn .t.Aa pa a" ,wear . �' 0 xwta.tr MITI erTants W Muse ntr r•tyer as havoc .. 1.To be owe rw.Wy wood of tam fn sank tnr so all of tots.teas 4rnrol roil err:to her rter to lnet ay the aW rOEMS&C.ma%W role'err w haanee ofil red nary Or raw that the sone la iron faad all w:W Y want and Oder eo O • • I.To YT no.age as pyrasts yonder 1r lo roe retort wand boron. 2.7o ny wan*w oD war Ire.raverµ of..ramarto MM soy M i..Ny ...aged r Lora • Meer W etgwy teases •InolAtM. . 1.To Wen n. e o Mrs m ra bedroom sot err t r rafrr row as et. o M M.tot way .am Weed be eed Ai • a oar modeler.earn ram or 4my.by Ire.Mew treed.to.'raMw W.rte amtrforrrl tie .taeefaaw%my"Sir, etr.rrf err .e.ntn to be ane.led rib..M'wr r.rene,Y M M1a1r I..As it. en Iatr say s.mr. Al tea errs et e M n. Y onf .r.e Orion fenn n el ferlrlr Sr the -geor r n Mnrletnllr.sums r rennet by reamer.wry M soon Y Mr In.wrtn.roo of Ow - MInMa'msleeoru.Y et.If flit am.Mfr ry.et ter.r...el.nta nn.be arytra to MTeeat of CO any rrMrn.a,rend r ours,terra by Ow menisci. , a To red lame presets In. Or Ions snot Way fry few.M moron on frla r mare.*Mb no for said hoes . a.NM te ,emit./IOM wilfully or by owelwt,an.rnhwhble Lperlation m the Value at ned renir or the laden..W.afrnwente moats thereon,but I.ref the red an feed Maw at all wows:on to moor.r anoint to h. rtod.cM Inn said pesos..any seed..s at r.tnernts more therm:art Y .re.II et miler waste te a enamelled Ohm TO fnla.n;M Y roe or none e.1 limier non/n.s•If errata say..r.rn.err n say he nmerrV!.r ono. a.ss. .tw rrM:W M to port oar reel raw• to demer.t le ra bras.*of ....me.insult w end art mere or fed iaedprts or torpor dna.ge or.noater of rid end. f L.,1 '.392 I I Lama r - _.._ th.. 1557fik500 A. T. T.._hate rryr.far a wain and mart IMwna aT•b rI 11 Y(wide UY wrew•� a- .- ay wee m ay all Wettest-flssY1r.w we be N4.I r weal w prelate lee Me Yee�r�Weer, . �. we aw.1.m.Mar M GMM.WWI(W*WWI la awe•Flt b rasp Ss 4n.we mar.w.�wt easy maw 1llw awe • The welted.le• 1 Y the Pane M W w 'SW ra 1• .e=la aaY w Iw w SIPS.wr amid alra T SIPS.Yak**Yak** *Li I.W w•w of 1M W4 a.MM...W rill w SP.I n•w•allaWW ) 4 wa1llOA Oaa haw W w.M 4 IS NI•.!v1 lmat1.r err laL •.I•l•oe1•ad W M.•i Yee et W Iy lid r•w�L wrwlM�wel� 1n no wan rrla•St nn a of raw Mw en u•a IM... ,/ •`• swan welly..w fell.Y=wawa meaner Y Jadaw.w w a'dW — Infer seas r I" • •Sam**w t W as** paid wavelet•MII Swan• w SM- wW.ew mar nW*....."...%.lhaww tea •b rid..wise al W•.Y 1 W re war A man ~l w W W+w waved awaT W Mao MYM/lee f f I t maid wrllyr boar M.a•I••R aerie...wY•nee wed mown,11 s—- M 1_•. W (hair• I 6Yf �., :1 wow.mad r1/ Wee Y OM•Moms 1. a.•ambit et oaf dl w/as w taw w4M Yrrl.l.f b W r w.u.or.r IM.we Nw lf•ewe w*,Moan,.,.wlnr W'Mn/tome/Stefan awed,.la..{M I°7_,___.°180."__,..°w ew pptle.w lee, It may Uwe la IM Mar rf Wawa cable be earlw•w.r mammas. w .•.r1 I waists*1 all Aar_.,able.W Weave of..molar wild,Wane w Meow.�rw�I IM W.wafts l►r la •. - I .war.ne IM••aloe.,e•rleri^yryne Iarr.uq et minim Ica adonis IwrMaw6 S.V Y.M./r ea r••On...ingots.M•w*M)a W a el Men ail t. rmar poplin awed. eewY*wins,era wbairn.aeawM.t \". r INi.lw•ulad.wyy.1MainlaellYMLLw11.•wana•ar rf11_waeewtl•,wit•yr l•la•MI fl U. IM rnY1M 1 of mid air.bolls'.Sawa.dewy ways,/lair..Woolen and 6wyra AO.M•y so wwlw/M Ye MM•r Stall t' he'wheel ..a Y Ilbeee roar..a.N•w1 stall tow. MOO W rl,lal'Sal step sawn is W essabe Yrrr et lid• • Mon el".tar SW.•.e W.W.I..w,IS et Y•it a w• ed,w.elwa et oil.*fin.Y*MS .1./l♦. .Weiler ! arnw.r wr•eeat. t.t pay the YWw,a may.woeW aMlrl wrwwr reef,at rM•wore.Mew•.r. .In Moto or lien tads swallowed arm".sl Y w•.a1MI"•as'NrMM Ir Wal w W/Mary wed,at lid W . I.tat can ea nll.r r W Ow OS,N W Imago rake la Wet newt,pet.an w all eta ; I eights l•Y\e sM•n.M•. tsar .4. e Y.1 M.MIS rant leaf I tatty ma e a k W MIMat .s sr Ono'sae"w 'e went•o•w.w stew Y the weyawe of is aaae'•wow alo.l•WWI..to r_er.M k M.pawls/r W panel t • 1 - la tenet rofWwrap•. kWe may.Yea ewarerb.Sa. "aa ewe i_s.-1 WMwa Ian no maai ail oo Won.arman Vim.ratn\.hid 1 the wwyy.y.W W Me•I tf W ewlay o(taree4 Dye r.gw..yi Mr.., aMMnlln W•f r I1111YI lIM W Moot.. • I.IS.owl of fewlma.,..f/air swelled,.~wee ea he waned Y Mw•Fenton,Helier M W taw to tam tar t...ead ewer...IM ew.lw NwI..1 wad.tad'Slat tS war.*w.ad arefat Ileneei the ewaa ea teNamed by teen aeon u M owed antler W Nona.el W Mort I.IM ay_.1.1 a.1JWMt beater sr ten Leal"or Vent lay wheys. ,•y In IM wait.wow,Maas Iola Y nay import ~no w,44,maxim hoof.Ike N W*pan 1 ewtw•w.ao .l. . •"flit"hare,.M Aw II fea ,f Wow dal sod p and able Yee Ylewt et a nu 44 an w tea maw aadw CS .e any Ike Mel/./e*Wa boom,wart t ho to f•no onto: t as lawn.toonno I ray ale ..90.0..90.0MaS . w t5.5 ••y seek rwMntr alit no a r M n•IMIM melt Art atop rob orlll Wawaa the newente and•olltalee MOW. • _ a Menne..Swot wives nwan at Winn a Helen .s so le non We Mon;swirled.ale ales IMewwed 1 all le hewed l r ..whole.swew5 ale ap n. t Mw, _ • tow non ..to and er1•.e.n.t w1.oama.na.MII floran.ad M Madly raw W MIT...anew.y.w.twte. . 1••••••••••NM Yams N IM Iwrwtw*In_here.. •. y.;•tllriltrni ea WNCXLO►.wewwlot Motlu M Il • te , e Mad and ail W r Wowm lay bad 1 find w Ir wa C. i4 1 1. ) I' IQ7L r_ :TT «• , • A.T.carrtutite-se4,._ _ ,'rr,1r1 07 cameo 6. Da1atfe -- - i IS • COUNTY or 14.14 I • _ Sews wa.W nannit d,a Nwary NUS'.Ia ale!n MM('anal.ad kale.all II" 10th 411 .... ..7tq .116O .par.oal*Prime" Enna D. Dolman and An K. 111ar.el his riff flyS.'p""�jawrth L. Islam and Dratta ..Lon, ML vita. fo�, has�.W ha...u e.^M the Wawa]wean * .M••wIM W.nYu ale(storms 1.•dwwnl • Ses t*so am tin nosy W w.o w their !moan/'Woman'err•ad"e"As Or wee*M o ant air`w1y6t tyl"1f4.I wIWday.M yw.w1•Wed.Ad ,l i 4 x1 Nitsz •C.I.p lw inn. 10, 1963 l .. b-✓el a runs or =eau= ) r l ) • • R'VdOralial ^ vas aadaad tefan an tali dq KN.. a ;Le h a. as inddant of the Qatari t1. ai Caaqutp„ a WryontfpM yia).fi(% 'tik4/sad KlJeLl hoar the day had ss% +r1C}ra, _-��`�+-'ra hae 10, 196) ,,•++t .f/u e r i Kr ...SZ t[reD}:ar.« • rr• � a fed•• I i ll S r 1- a I I(1 ( \ e . ..2.4:.} `i • l I)I r y • K ~ E �� a e Y a3 : 1 • • • C_ X392 . • a . 5 • . I 1 .ti ov tr J , OV eJ 890392 Cosa 25 7 . • r • • • 1^1 r,d/. 1Y) 4 !! • Y ':f ylr • •1 C •'94�ro -. SOf1 iAl kW! Jl1 t i.��". li i.., ! 1� .,iNMAPPOillgeirg� .7/ IAbIS • • RECEIPT WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley. Colorado�lo 80631 -'Y DATE ` '— /��J1 / L 19� R EIPT �/f�i L' 99 , .) ,.+ .\ �� RECEIVED FROM -, ,T\ �;r^o ' Tilr 1 ; IACC'Y no, l NO. I TYPE II FEE • \, Snh }t"nf. 0110143216 COZ L .^ 0110143216 USR I II i . �•M 0110143216`ZPMH HZP/ZPAD 0110143216 RE/SE ti 0110143216 SUB 0110143216 FHDP/CHOP II 10110143216 BOA .4 t5`'e�\ ; � " r" LS.i './hrt n° r ^/ 1 0110143216 INVEST. FEE ^o2 T .4 , ,}i1 +� .'p'��c 1 y 10110143215 MAPS/PUB. �✓*' 4.S1fG'rt•Cr..4Y^1d a,, r r..\ti bA� li:� !\r(n6. ,\` 1 0110143215 POST.&&HAND. I� II I I I CASH /L E M.O. / • .;.• �-,��'4°.,,/ �" " 1� ��, ., TOTAL BY wwe.-My�y .'ai.^r+�i ;.l.nU s� 590392 r CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the surrounding property owners and owners and lessees of minerals in accordance with the notification requirements of Weld County in the case 9ZPMH-1543 for Cactus Hill Ranch in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail by postal card as addressed on the attached list. This 17th day of April 1989. l^, T0: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS The Geld County Board of County Commissioners will hold a publ:lh hearing on Wednesday May 3, 1989, at 9:CO a..m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, concerning the request of: CASE NUMBER: ZPNR-1543 APPLICANT: Cactus Hill Ranch REQUEST: Zoning Permit for a Mobile for a Home to be used as a principal dwelling LEGAL: Parc cf the NW} of Section 16, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles north of the Town of Windsor, south of State Highway 14 ana east of State Highway 257 , For tore infcrm..ation call Brian J. Single, Current Planner. WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE?, 915 7Cth Street - Room 342 Greeley, CO 80631 Phone 356-4000, Ext. 4400 390392 MAILING LIST Cactus Hill Ranch 2PMH-1543 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Thornton, CO 80229 K & M Company 3201 Shore Road Fort Collins, CO 80524 Wilbur Miller 8850 Highway 14 Fort Collins, CO 80524 John May 1709 Whistle Pig Lane Broomfield, CO 80020 � : .- 890392 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE • I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE # 2111O4 I5C/3 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: N {(5 w tko n. NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS t.5 DAY OF /('n/./t�+ 19 c / SEAL 0TARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES / ZQLC /%, 1,l/ LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 4 'rjj 2 3i 19a APR 2 6 1989 Wald Co. Plamwm �muxn�T;w 890392 RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE AND THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of. the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney's Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance are Harold and Neva Grimes; Golden Buckeye Petroleum; Aurelio Nunez; and O.F.T. , Inc. , and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters , the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas O. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Harold and Neva Grimes; Golden Buckeye Petroleum; Aurelio Nunez; and O.F.T. , Inc. , to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. 890388 J Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS‘7111ATTEST: �� WELD COU_NTTY,/COL�OPADO Weld County erk and Recorder /�/f , �3/ and Clerk to the Board y C.W. Kirby, Chairman : nw-,,.4 e/ -.u-j'.e J 1 e Jo on, Pro-Tem County erk APPR2eputy ED AS TO FORM ,ene R. Brantner __x- le — - CrThCk--:;)ee-ed-efi George County Attorney Goad ' I 890388 ‘ t4w4 mEmoRAn®um To Board of County Commissioners May 3, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services Legal Action Authorization Subject The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: TCV-1061 BCV-1066 Harold & Neva Grimes Golden Buckeye Petroleum 17605 Weld County Road 10 165 S. Union Brighton, CO 80601 Suite 850 Denver, CO 80228 Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI-1332 Aurelio Nunez 233 North 10th Avenue Brighton, CO 80601 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. g90388 t(i MEMORAnDU(n WinosT. Board of County Commissioners title Nay 2, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services p c Legal Action Authorization sutt The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI-1332 0.F.T., Inc, P.O. Box 606 Boulder, CO 80530 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 890368 RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 46 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 55 AND 57 FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 WORKING DAYS FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . .local authorities , with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for p:•oject completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . . " , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 46 between Weld County Roads 55 and 57 be temporarily closed, with said closure being effective May 1 , 1989, for approximately 10 working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. /. / 890387 y Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 46 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, R.D. , 1989, nunc pro tune May 1 , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST; WELD COUNTY„ COLORADO Weld County Jerk and Recorder , Irb and Clerk to the Roard C.W. y, • airman fJo f Ja qu pine J �.nson, Pro-Tem eauty County C r r-� r APPR VED AS TO FORM: n- Brant /! n • �� !/ te,orge ems'' ti .�County Attorney 890387 • • - - . . • L'- Ty e bowel co � 1�-i �rrLo4 'sec( k' �� qa' • 1 Cl. 1N lip �I (A/Cg <A • ...p._ • ' Jr. .z1Yr)cot4-5 izi a w/ : P n T(os/ /r •.__.- A CA C &O cl l (C.� cl- -De/Our Pt e OW;"sue s; - & Q LOCO ( f7IIPC/c Oh IT `Y - • d C(osS s//S4 rev br,49e. rep/cc psis,' yG/ssA) F0 r- oppraw MalP &j /0 wok �rk .. .7,,,-------_ .:.�_ • CAy F ` :. TITLE P' J 9(nrt wce a& a/ u)c,e 85 W &cle 57 SURVEY BY DATE •• .- • DRAWN BY f lour DATE Sr' -. C-4ECKED BY DATE 1 '- � COUNTY ROAD NO. 7 APPROVED BY COUNTY EUCINEER - WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT 0= ENGINEERING I rORu ,6 8.90397 2/7: .--- -... —.. ...-.r- -- 7- nrr■ I mifr __ I fst‘D MEMORA(lDUM W I To Clerk to the Board Dete May 1, 1989 George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge COLORADO From Road Closure Subject: The following road was closed May 1, 1989 for a bridge replacement. It will be closed approximately 10 working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 46 between WCR 55 & WCR 57 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 46 WCR 55 WCR 57 890387 RESOLUTION RE: CANCELLATION OF OUTSTANDING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FOR THE WELD COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a list of ambulance accounts which have been deemed uncollectible in accordance with guidelines adopted by the City and County has been submitted to the Accounting Department of Weld County, Colorado, a copy of said list being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the Accounting Department has recommended to the Board of County Commmissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that said list of uncollectible debts due and owing the Weld County Ambulance Service in the amount of $8 ,818 .18 be cancelled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the aforementioned list of uncollectible accounts in the amount of $8,818. 18 be, and hereby is, approved for cancellation. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989. C2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: t3/477l1 �� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder //2" and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, C96airman Nwoct BY: U,14-4,.pJ e , Li J lièhnO , Pflm eputy County erk APPR VED AS TO FORM: ,e R. Bran er George Kenne l County Attorney Gord n acYYYVVV``�'� i ;� :� 890386 WELD BOUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE — UNCOLLECTAdLE ACCOUNTS PAGE 1 • ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT ACCOUNT AMOUNT NUMBER DUE NUMBER DUE NUMBER DUE 00007221 $21.60 00009897 *321.00 00010483 $342.00 00010851 $412.00 00010922 *287.00 00010980 6262.00 00011042 $392.00 00011055 *410.00 00011063 *444.00 00011077 147.21 0001/093 $376.00 00011101 163.34 00011100 $298.00 00011115 3607.99 00011119 $294.00 00011144 $290.00 00011165 *302.00 00011169 $272.00 00011181 $557.00 00011/85 170.80 00011197 $430.36 00311203 1302.00 00011218 $317.00 00011221 1382.00 00011275 $300.53 00011282 $359.31 00011285 *341.04 00011430 *310.00 TOTAL 18,818. 18 890386 I . III . i ii APRIL 2S, 1989 MR. DON WARDEN FINANCE DIRECTOR MELD COUNTY GREELeY, COLORADO SObil DEAk MR.RARDEN, ATTACHED IS A LISTING OF THOSE AMBULANCE ACCOUNTS WHICH HAVE BEEN DEEMED UNCOLLECTABLC. PLEASE PRESENT THESE TO THE BOARD FOR THEIR APPROVAL TO WRITE THEM OFF. CORDIALLY, RY M • AdE3 DIRECTOR WELD UNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE 890386 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF CAROL KOBEL AND STEVEN MODRELL TO THE COMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY BOARD WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, vacancies currently exist on the Communications Advisory Board, and WHEREAS, it has been recommended that Carol Kobel, be appointed to serve on said Board, representing the District Attorney's Office, with her term to expire December 31 , 1991 , and WHEREAS, it has been recommended that Steven Modrell be appointed to represent Police Zone 4 on said Board, with his term to expire December 31 , 1990, and WHEREAS, the Board desires to appoint the above mentioned individuals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Carol Kobel be, and hereby is, appointed to the Communications Advisory Board, with her term to expire December 31 , 1991 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Steven Modrell be, and hereby is, appointed to the Communications Advisory Board, with his term to expire December 31 , 1990. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989. 1.77117/"4"&) - _� • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: 1 ) WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Ch man J c u e J son, Pro-Tem Deputy County erk �`A�;7�/�� APPR VED AS TO FORM: -one R. Brantner 0 v;) George en y County Attorney Go7tdieStrr, 890391 Please add the following appointments to the Board's Monday, May 8, agenda: Communications Board Carol Kobel will replace Mel Leedom as the District Attorney's representative. Her term will expire 12-31-91. Steven Modrell will replace Jerry LaDoucer who represented Police Zone 4. His term will expire 12-31-90. 890391 r RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE 1989-1990 JTPA MASTER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with the 1989-1990 JTPA Master Contract to enable Weld County to operate and expend funds under the Job Training Partnership Act, and WHEREAS, the term of said Master Contract is from July 1, 1989, through June 30 , 1990 , with the further terms and conditions being as stated in said Contract, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the 1989-1990 JPTA Master Contract he, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Contract. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 3rd day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: '�^^ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder ! ' and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kir y"b , Q airman gY: nq,-a 1p, .7r-erJ _ J.cqu Tine o 1nns�o�nt,—Pro-Tem Deputy County Jerk APPR VED AS TO FORM: ene R. Br ntner 44 C—TheZ ��Jy2�� y, eG orge Re ne . cp County Attorney 7, Gor 890395 far! ; MEMORAnDUM C. W. Kirby, Chairman WIlD To Board of County Commissioners Oats May 3, 1989 COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources idatar suo;ec, JTPA Master Contract 1989 - 1990 Between Employment Services of Weld County and the Governor's Job Training Office Enclosed for Board approval is the Master Contract between the Governor's Job Training Office and Employment Services of Weld County through the Board of Weld County Commissioners, to enable Weld County to operate and expend funds under the Job Training Partnership Act. The Contract covers the period of July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990 with a deadline of June 30,1992, at which time all funds awarded through the Contract must expended. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3816. 141‘‘ 4 b ' s v clk "Y",plc;"` Y A ..7n,�5 a v] AZ - .., l7 y.Ayy,R(Fy�e knh ''t �4{ TO: Clerk to the Board b��• • FR: Judy Ortega.' 'RE: 1989 - 1990 JTPA Master Contract Between Employment Services 1;',. ." and the oovel^nor's:Job Training Office ...^ Enclosed for signature are six (6) copies. '-' Please return five (5) of them once they A, I have:been signed. If you have any questions, please telephone me at,353-3815. ' 7�n/ i• ;14j5;. 4 rG ; �.. M ._� 890395 Dept. or Agency # G/L Account # Contract Routing # Contract # Encumbrance # CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this Day of 1989, effective the 1st day of July 1989 by and between the State of Colorado, represented by the Governor's Job Training Office, hereinafter referred to as GJTO, or the State, and Weld County, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor. WHEREAS, authority exists in the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) of 1982, also known as P.L. 97-570, as amended, and the Governor has received a grant of federal funds thereunder; and WHEREAS, the JTPA (Section 101[a][II], requires the designation of Service Delivery Areas (SDAs) by the Governor; and WHEREAS, Executive Order 00010 83 of March 15, 1983, has designated this SDA in accord with JTPA; and WHEREAS, required approval , clearance, and coordination have been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies; and WHEREAS, contract authority for Weld County resides in the Weld County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, authority exists in the law and funds have been budgeted, appropriat- ed, and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 1001, G/L Account Number �, Contract Encumbrance Number ; and WHEREAS, the Contractor has selected the entity (or entities) which will be the SDA for funds from the state in accordance with Section 104(b)(1) of JTPA. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, the parties enter into the following agreement: I. DEFINITIONS A list of definitions to be used in the interpretation of this Contract is attached hereto as Attachment 1, and by this reference is incorporat- ed herein. II. STATEMENT OF WORK The Contractor agrees to perform, in a professional and workmanlike man- ner, the obligations and responsibilities set forth in the allowable "Allowable Program", Section II.A of the Contract, Page 1 of 17 890395 A. Allowable Programs A.1 The Contractor and its SDA has prepared a two-year Job Training Plan (JTP) in accordance with Section 104 of JTPA (Exhibit A). The JTP has been modified to reflect actual funding and program- - matic decisions prior to the beginning of the second year (Ex- hibit 8). Both the Program Year 1990-1991 (PY 90-91) JTP and the PY 88 modifications are attached and are hereby incorporated and made part of the Contract by this reference. A.2 GJTO shall provide funds to the SDA for activities pursuant to the approved JTP referenced in Section I.A.1. A.3 In addition to the funds provided for the basic grant activities identified in the approved JTP, GJTO may provide funds to the - Contractor for the following other activities: A.3.a Training programs for older individuals (those individuals - 55 years or older) , (Section 202[b][2] of JTPA); - A.3.b Technical assistance incentives for superior performance, - and serving hard-to-serve individuals (Section 202[b][3] of JTPA); A.3.c Auditing, administrative, and other activities (Section 164 of JTPA) ; A.3.d Training program for dislocated workers (Section 301[b] of JTPA) ; - A.3.e Services for small groups with special needs and exemp- lary models pursuant to joint agreements (Section 501[a] of JTPA); A.3.f Amendments and modifications of allocated funds provided to the Contractor pursuant to Section 202(a) of JTPA; and A.3.g Other funds for employment and training-related programs. A.4 GJTO shall provide funds for Summer Youth Employment and Training Programs in accorcdance with Section 251(b) of JTPA, if such ac- tivities are not originaly included in the JTP by the Contractor. B. Maximum Funding B.1 GJTO shall provide the Contractor an amount not to exceed Two _ Million, Eight Hundred Seventy-Eight Thousand, Twenty-Three Dol- lars ($2,878,023) of funds awarded to the State of Colorado for - activities identified in Section II.A for the period of July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1992. Page 2 of 17 $9Q395 6.2 Funds authorized to be expended by the Contractor will be limited to authorized funding received from the Department of Labor or other sources. The authorization to spend funds may be provided to GJTO in increments. Therefore, GJTO shall limit the amount requested by the Contractor for each Expenditure Authorization (EA) to the amount in the GJTO Notice of Fund Availability. C. Expenditure Authorization Procedures C.1 Prior to the expenditure of any funds identified in Section I.6 above, an EA must be submitted by the Contractor and approved by GJTO. C.2 An EA is a document prepared by the Contractor which shall in- clude the following: C.2.a Type of funds identified in Section I.A of this Contract which the Contractor is requesting; C.2.b The Scope of Work to be performed by the Contractor; C.2.c Period of Performance; C.2.d A budget or budgets submitted on forms provided by GJTO. A separate budget will be required for each type of funding re- ceived by the Contractor, such as, but not limited to, those pro- grams identified in Section II.A above. C.2.e Special Provisions; and C.2.f Signature page signed by the Private Industry Council (PIC) Chair, the SDA Director, and GJTO; if the total amount of the EA is One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or less. The PIC may authorize the SDA Director to sign in lieu of the PIC Chair for EAs under One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or less. If the EA is over One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) , the Local Elected Official must sign instead of the SDA Director. The Contractor must comply with its own internal signature process. Should the internal signature process be more restrictive than this provision, it will prevail. C.3 The Contractor may include EA provisions (C.1 and C.2) in its subcontracts, which are approved by GJTO, with a provision that GJTO shall be a third party beneficiary of such provisions. The Contractor shall be obligated to GJTO for the enforcement of such provisions. Page 3 of 17 890395 D. Modification Procedure for EA Budget The Contractor may modify the EA and its budget in accordance with GJTO policies and procedures with prior written approval of both PIC and GJTO. E. Equipment No equipment or property valued in excess of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) may be purchased without prior written approval of GJTO. In addition, this equipment or property must be incorporated in the Con- tractor inventory and submitted to GJTO pursuant to GJT0 policies and procedures. F. Duration The JTP shall remain in full force and effect for the entire Contract period, unless changes in labor market conditions, funding, or other factors require substantial modifications as provided in Section 104(c) of JTPA. Such a modification would require an amendment to this Contract. G. Annual Report The Contractor shall submit an annual report by September 30, each year as required by JTPA Letter #86-18 (December 16. 1986). The re- port shall include: G.1 A description of activities/services conducted during the program year for Title II-A, Title III, 8%, and 3% programs; G.2 A list of client characateristics and the number of each served; G.3 A list of occupations in which training took place and the number of participants in each. G.4 A summary of the SDA's performance in meeting federal/state standards; 6.5 Status of coordination agreements and description of innovative coordination taking place which would be of special interest to other SDAs, the Job Training Coordinating Council , and the Governor; G.6 An evaluation of service providers which include ability to meet performance goals, cost, quality of training, and characteristics of participants; and G.7 A summary of the Contractor's monitoring of subrecipient con- tracts, corrective actions taken, and the results of such cor- rective actions. Page 4 of 17 890395 N. Exhibits The terms and conditions contained in the PY 88-89 JTP are by this reference incorporated herein. Exhibit A, attached hereto, is incorporated and made a part hereof. I Exhibit A - PY 89 JTP Modification III. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The period of performance shall be from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1992. XV. GENERAL PROVISIONS The Contractor agrees to perform in accordance with, and to comply with, the General Provisions, attached to this Contract, and by this reference hereby incorporated into this Contract. V. SPECIAL PROVISIONS The Contractor agrees to perform in accordance with, and to comply with, the Special provisions attached to this Contract. VI. EOUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES!AFFIRMATIYE ACTION A. Equal Employment Opportunity Requirements The Contractor shall insure Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) to all individuals and shall take Affirmative Action (AA) to insure ade- quate utilization of members of protected classes of workers who have _ been victims of past discrimination. EEO shall mean that no individual shall be excluded from participa- tion in, denied the benefits of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in any program fund- ed under this section because of race, color, or national origin, age, handicap, or political affiliation or belief. Contractors shall be governed by the prohibitions against discrimina- tion on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, on the basis of handicap under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, on the basis of sex under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, or on the basis of race, color, or national origin under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1976. Programs and activities funded under this Act are considered to be programs receiving Federal financial assistance and are all subject to all provisions of EEO. Page 5 of 17 890395 a 3/24 GENERAL PROVISIONS I. LEGAL AUTHORITY The Contractor assures and guarantees that it possesses the legal auth- ority to enter into this Contract. Inc person or persons signing and executing this Contract on behalf of the Contractor co nereoy warrant and guarantee that they have peen fully authorized by tne Contractor to execute this Contra:: on behalf of tne Contractor. jI. PAYMENT CONTINGENCY Tne parties hereto expressly recognize that the Contractor is to be paid, reimpursed or otherwise compensated with funds provioed to GJTO by tne United States Department of Labor under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and/or the =Economic Dislocation and Worker Adjustment Assist- ance Act (EDWAA). Therefore, tne Contractor expressly understands and agrees that all its rights, :emends and claims to compensation arising under this Contract are contingent upon receipt of such funds and upon GJTD continuing to receive such funds. If any part cf the funds are not received by GJTD, for any reason, GJTD may unilaterally terminate this Contract, or, with the consent of the Contractor, modify tne terms here- of. Insofar as this contingency affects the Contractor, supredipients or suppliers, for mutual protection of the parties, tae Contractor agrees to include this contingency in all its subco,.,, ..__s. III. TERMINATION The performance of work under this Contract may be terminated by GJTD in accordance with this clause in whole or in part. A. GJTD may terminate this Contra:: when it has been determined that the Contractor has failed to provide any or all of tne services specified or failed to comply with any Federal reouiremen:s cr provisions con— tained within this Contract. GJTO will notify tne Contractor of such unsatisfactory performance in writing The Cont ten (10) 'Contra:tor has working days, unless otherwise specified in tne notice, after receipt in which to respond with a written plan a sole to GJTD for cor- rection of deficiencies. If the Contractor does not respond within tne appointed time with aoprooriate plans, GJTD snail serve a term- ination notice on the Contractor. E. GJTD may terminate this Contract if it is determined that the Federal Government has debarred or suspended the Contractor within a three year period preceding this Contract, or cedars the Contrac:or curing the tern cf this Contract. C. GJTD may request a termination of this Contract for convenience, giv- ing a thirty (30) calendar day advance notice in writing of the ef- fective date of such a termination.. The Contractor receiving notice shall be entitled to receive just and eoui:able compensation for any aliowaple services satisfactorily performed hereunder tnrough tne date of termination.. 890395 Page 6 of 17 D. GJTO may reouest in writing, a termination of this Contract when both parties agree that continuation of the services specified in Section I , Statement of Work, would not produce beneficial results commensur- ate with the further expenditure of funds. E. After receipt of a notice of termination, the Contractor shall : E.1 Stop work under the Contract on the date and to the extent speci- fied in the notice of termination. E.2 Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities, except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the work unoer tne Contract as is E.3 Terminate all orders and subcontracts to the extent that they re- late to the performance of tne work terminated by the notice of termination. E.4 Assign to GJT0 all of the rights, title and interest within the Contract. GJTO shall have the right, at its discretion, to set- tle or pay any or all claims arising out of the termination of this Contract. E.5 Settle all outstanding liabilities and all claims arising out of such termination of orders and subcontracts in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. E.6 Transfer title of all Contract property to GJTO (to the extent that title has not already been transferred) and deliver in the manner and at a time specified by GJTO. E.7 Take such action as may be necessary or as may be directed, for the protection and preservation of the property related to this Contract which is in the possession of the Contractor and in which GJTO has or may acquire an interest. F. After receipt of a notice of termination, the Contractor receiving notice shall submit to GJTO its completed and acceptable closeout package in the form and with the certification prescribed by GJTO. Such closeout package shall be submitted promptly, but in no event, later than two (2) months from the effective date of termination, un- less one or more extensions in writing are granted by GJTO. G. The Contractor shall have the right to appeal any unilateral deter- mination to terminate in accordance with the JTPA. In any case, where GJTO has made a determination of the amount due, GJTO shall pay to the Contractor the following: G.1 If there is no right of appeal hereunder or if no timely appeal has been submitted, the amount so determined by GJTO; or G.2 If an appeal has been submitted, the amount finally determined on such appeal . Page 7 of 17 890395 H. GJTO may, from time to time, under such terms and conditions as it may prescribe, make partial payments on account against costs incur- red by the Contractor in connection with the terminated portion of the Contract wnenever, in the opinion of GJTO, the aggregate of such payment shall oe within the amount to which the Contractor will be entitled hereunder. IV. MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND RECORD MAINTENANCE A. In addition to any requirements imposed elsewhere in this Contract, the Contractor shall ensure that sufficient, auditable and otherwise ape- ouate records that will provide accurate, current, separate and come plete disclosure of the status of the funds received under the Contract are maintained for three (3) years or the completion and resolution of an audit. Such records shall be sufficient to allow the U.S. Depart- _ ment of Labor, firms conducting audits of JTPA funds and GJTO to audit and monitor the Contractor. Accordingly, recipients/subrecipients shall maintain a copy of the Par- ticipant Record which records any participant's participation in the JTPA program, including dates of entry and termination and shall retain such records at least a minimum of tnree years. The time necessary to resolve any litigation, audit or claim involving the grant or agreement covered by the records, which was initiated prior to the end of the three-year retention period does extend the retention period.E. The Contractor shall ensure that it will comply with the provisions of GJTO's Audit Policy. C. GJTO's Monitoring Unit and the U.S. Department of Labor, GJTO's audi- tors, and other representatives of GJTO shall , during business hours, have access to inspect and copy books, records, memoranda, correspon- dence, personnel staffing records, and any other documents, and shall be allowed to monitor and review through on-site visits, all program activities, personnel staff, services and programmatic and administra- tive practices, supported with funds under this Contract to ensure corn- - pliance with the terms of this Contract, and provisions of any subcon- tracts funded in whole or in part through this Contract. D. The Contractor shall review the findings of said Monitoring Unit or re- - presentative and shall act promptly, as directed by GJTO, to remedy de- ficiencies noted in such findings. If corrective action is not taken and such deficiencies persist, GJTO may terminate this Contract. E. In the event that GJTO determines that the recordkeeping system of the Contractor does not comply with Federal guidelines, financial account- _ ing may be done by GJTO, or an accounting firm or bank approved by GJTO. The cost to GJTO of any work snall be deducted monthly from the funds allocated to the Contractor. Page 8 of 17 890395 II I' Y. SUBCONTRACTING The Contractor shall not subcontract the performance of any part of its cuties unoer this Contract except in accorcance with the terms of this Contract or with the prior written consent of GJTD approving the subcon- tractor. VI. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT A. The Contractor must submit a written recuest to GJTD prior to the Purchase of any eouipment with a unit cost of Five Hundred Dollars (5500) or more. Upon receipt of GJTC's written approval , the Con- tractor may proceed with the purchase, and submit a New Eouipmert Notification Form to GJTD. 5370 shall retain title to all eouipment, in excess of Five Hundred Dollars (S500) , purchased by the Contrac- tor, and, therefore, prior written approval is needed before disposi- tion of equipment purchased by the Contractor with funds from GJT^u. The Contractor small comply with 6370's property management proced- ures and all relevant JTPA letters. B. The Contractor ensures that it will maintain proper inventory control over all equipment purchased with JIM funcs. VII. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign this Contract to third parties without prior written consent of 5370 approving both the assignment and the assignee. - VIII. SEVERABILITY To the extent that this Contract may be executed and performance of the obligations of the parties may be accomplished within the intent of `ne Contract, the terms of this Contract are severable, and should any term _ or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative, such in— validity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or - provision hereof. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall no: be construed as a waiver of any other tern. IX. CHANGES IN STATEMENT OF WORK A. Modification by Operation of Law This Contract is subject to such modification as may be required by - chances in federal or state law or regulations. Any such recuired modification shall be incorporated into and be part of this Contract as if fully set forth herein. Page 9 of 17 590395 8. Proorammatic Modifications, The Contractor shall follow the revision procedures set forth by GJTO. B.1 The Contractor must submit a written request to GJTO and obtain prior written approval for changes to the Statement of work the objective of the Contract, or dollar amount cnanges in Line Items. E.2 In addition to the foregoing procedure, prior approval for such changes must be authorized by the State in an amendment to this Contract properly executed and approved in accordance with appli- cable law under the following circumstances: E.2.a When an increase or decrease of Contract total is desired: and E.2.b When the Statement of work or the objective of the Contract changes substantially, as determined by GJTO. Under such circumstances, GJTO's approval is not binding until the Contract amendment is executed. X. PROGRAM INCOME If program income is generated under this Contract, an agreement provid- ing for the use of such income subseouent to termination of this Con- tract is required, prior to the expenditure of such funds. XI. INTEGRATION OF UNDERSTANDINGS, This agreement is intended as the complete integration of all under- standings between the parties. No prior or current addition, deletion, or other amendment shall have any force or effect whatsoever, unless VII- bodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal , addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect un- less embodied in a writing that is executed and approved pursuant to the State r-iscal Rules and other applicable statutes and regulations. XII. ASSURANCES A. The Contractor assures that it will fully comply with the JTPA, regu- lations promulgated, and all other applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations. E. The Contractor assures that in operating programs funded under the Act, it agrees to comply with all GJTO issuances and directives, such as JTPA letters. Page 10 of 17 590395 C. The Contractor assures that it will acminister its programs uncer the JTPA in full compliance with safecuares against fraud and abuse as set forth in JTPA and the JTPA regulations. D. The Contractor agrees to abide by the provisions of Section 144 of tne JTPA which concerns grievance procedures. Further, the Contrac- tor agrees to follow Federal Regulations governing grievance resolu- tion of all complaints, including those oased on handicap, but ex- cluding complaints alleging discrimination. All discrimination com- plaints except those based on handicap must be filed initially at tne U.S. Directorate of Civil Rights. Finally, the Contractor also agrees to follow all pertinent Governor's policy issuances concerning grievance procedures. E. No funds may be used to assist in relocating establishments, or parts thereof, from one area to another unless the Secretary determines tnat such relocation will not result in an increase in unemployment in the area of original location or in any otner area [JTPA, Section 141(c)J• F. The Contractor assures and certifies that in administering programs under JTPA: F.1 It will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation As- sistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 (P.L- 91-645) which reouires fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and Federally-assisted programs. F.2 It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act, where appli- cable, which limit the political activity of certain State and local government employees. ` F.3 For grant, subgrants, contract, and subcontracts in excess of One Hundred Thousand Dollars (S100,000) , or where the grant officer has determined that orders under an indefinite quantity contract or subcontract in any year will exceed One Hundred Thousand Dol- lars (S100,000) , or if a facility to be used has been the subject of a conviction under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857-8) (c) (1) or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act r33 U.S.C. 1319 (C): and is listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or is not otherwise exempt, the grantee assures that: F.3.a No facility to be utilized in the performance of the pro- posed grant has been listed on the EPA list of Violating Facilities; /t will notify the Regional Administrator, prior to award, of the receipt of any communication from the Director, Of- fice of Federal Activities, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, indicating that a facility to be utilized for the grant is under consideration to be listed on the EPA list of Violating Facilities; and Page 11 of 17 890395 F.2.c It will include substantially this assurance, including this third part, in every non-exempt suogrant, contract or suocontract. F.4 It will comply with appropriate labor standards as set forth in Section 143 of the JTPA (20 CFR 629.22 and 629.33) ; F.5 All grievances concerning the conduct of the Contractor shall follow the grievance procedures set forth in 20 CFR 629.51 et seq; F.6 It will comply with the Child Labor laws; F.7 It will comply with the Safety Standards of Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) ; F.8 It will comply with the Davis Bacon Act; F_9 It will comply with the wagner—Peyser-Act; F.10 It will comply with Part C of Title IV of the Social Security Act; F.11 It will comply with the Military Selective Services Act; F.I2 It will comply with Section 665, Title 18, United States Code; F.I3 It will comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; F.14 It will comply with the Colorado Revised Statutes Section 18-6-301 C.R.S. , as amended (Bribery and Corrupt Influence) ; F.I5 It will comply with Colorado Revised Statutes Section 16-8-401-408 C.R.S, as amended (Abuse of Public Office) ; and F.16 It will comply with all state procurement regulations where ap- propriate. G. The Contractor assures that it will comply with bonding and insurance requirement as follow:: G_1 Upon written request to the Contractor being made by the State, the Contractor shall maintain during the life of the Contract Bodily Injury and Property Damage insurance, acceptable to the State covering the services hereunder and all operations in con- nection herewith, and whenever any of the services covered in the Contract is to be subcontracted, the Contractor shall optain in- surance coverage acceptable to the State, such as Contractor's Contingent or Protective Liability and Property Damage insurance, to protect its interest and those of the State, if any. Pogo 12 of 17 890395 G.2 Whenever the work covered by the Contract shall involve the use of vehicular ecuipment, the Contractor shall maintain curing tne life of the Contract, Automotive Bodily Injury and Property Dam- age Insurance for business use with limits not less than One Hun- cred and Fifty Thousand Dollars (5150,000) personal liability to any one person in any one accioent, Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (5400,000) for an injury to two or more persons in any single oc- currence, and Four Huncred Thousand Dollars (S400,000) for prop- erty carnage to protect tne Contractor from any and an claims arising from the use of the following in the execution of the services incluced in the Contract: G.2.a Contractor's own vehicles; G.2.b Hired vehicles; and, G.2.c Vehicles not Owned by the Contractor. 0.2.d The State shall not be in the policy as a named insured. G_3 Upon written recuest to the Contractor beinc made by the State, the Contractor shall maintain during the life of this Contract. Physical Damage or Loss Insurance protecting against loss caused by the perils of fire, smoke, theft, burglary, vandalism, and storm acceptable to the State, covering tne services hereunder and all operations, equipment and materials furnished or used in connection therewith. The cash bond in an amount to be deter- mined by the State may be given to meet this requirement as re- gards State property. G.4 Excepting the Insurance required by Paragraph G.2 above, one cer- tified copy of the foreeoing policies and three copies of a cer- tificate evidencing the existence thereof shall be delivered to the State within 20 days of such written recuest being made by the State. Certified copies of tne policies required by said Paragraph G.2 and three copies of the certificates evidencing the existence thereof shall be delivered to the State before use of vehicular equipment is undertaken, as described in said Paragraph G.2. Each copy and certificate must bear the following special endorsement by the agent of the proposed insurance carrier: "This policy shall not be altered, materially changed or cancel- led without giving 15 days prior written notice, by certified mall , to GJT0. G_5 A valid receipt showing payment or obligation for the payment of the premium for all such insurance, excepting the insurance re- ouired by said Paragraph G.2, snall be submitted to the State by tne Contractor when it provides the insurance documentation to the State for acknowledgement of receipt and aoeouacy by the proper State officials. Receipts showing payment or obligation, for the payment of the premium for the insurance required by said Paragraph C.2 shall be submitted to the State with the policies and certificates to which the receipts refer before use of tne vehicular equipment involved is undertaken by the Contractor. Page 13 of 17 890395 H. Tne Contra::or assures that It, and its subcontra_:Drs, shall comply with the Workmen's Combensat1on Act of Co o rao0 ant snail orovibe co:.Densa:ion insurance to protect the Contractor, Its subcontractors ant the State from and against any ant ail Worker's :omber.sa:ion claims arising from performance of services unoer the Contract. Tne State snail De furnished, Prior to taken by the Contractor, any service irate per certificates e ti iunoer- cates evioen:ing such insurance to co:,De es of certificate or certifi:z:es D Da i n effect. I. The Contractor assures that prior to the initial disbursement of s, un_^s to the Contractor it snail ensure that every officer, director spent, or employee authorize: to a:• on a,f of receiv Lctor in reiving or Depositing tunes into p opramtt:ounts�;6 or inaissuing ointments, ne:ks, or other instruments of oayment for pro- gram costs snail obtain a ficeli` y bond to provioe protection against loss. The Coverage shall be: • 1.1 One Hundred Thousand Dollars (3100,000) ; or 1.2 an amount ecual to the highest amour,` received from G3TO. which- ever is greater. :f the y • fidelity bond of any employee of the Contractor is cancelled or coverage is su_Stantially rebu:ed, the Contractor snail notify CM) and u"JTO shall not disburse any funds thereafter until GJTO"re- ceives and acknowledges assurance from the Contra:`or :net acecuate insurance coverage had been attained. Z1 . The Contractor assures that every reasonable course of action will be taken by the Contractor to maintain the integrity of this expenditure of public funds and to avoid any favoritism or Questionable or 17,- proper Conduct. The contract will be atministered in an it:Par:121 manner, free from personnel , financial , or poiitital gain. The Con- tractor, its executive staff and employee:, in acministering this Contract, will avoid Situations which give rise to t suggestion tnz` any Decision was influenced by e - personal gain. prejudice, bias, special interest. or K. The Contractor assures and certifies tha d it ant its principal:: K.1 Are not presently debarred, Suspended, Proposed for debarment, e__tared ineligible, or volute d nti1y excludefrom cover::: trans- actions by any federal department or ag-n:y; K.2 Have not, within a three-year period preceding this Contract, been convicted of or nad a civil Juogment rendered a;ainst :nem for ccnt;,issi0n of fraud or a criminal offense connection with asttaining,r ID„m msting to obtain, or per`:mint a-pupi:C (`eCe- cal) transaction or contract uncer a ~?:colicai , transac- tion; violation of federal or state anti:sion of embe:Zlement, theft, `order bribery, statutes or commis- sion c_Struction Of records, " Y' statements, s,or falsification or g . cs, m stolen property; skits false_ m:zcements, or receiving Page 14 of 17 890395 a K.3 Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charoed by a government entity (federal , state, or local ) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (K2) of this certification; and K.4 Have not within a three-year period preceding this Contract, had one or more public transactions (federal , state, or local ) ter- minated for cause or oefault. Where the Contractor is unable to certify to any of the state- ments in this certification, such Contractor shall attach an ex- planation to this proposal. 890395 Page 15 of 17 I Form 6-AC-02R SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL 1. This contract shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the State of Colorado or such assistant as he may designate.This provision is applicable to any contract involving the payment of money by the State. FUND AVAILABILITY 2. Financial obligations of the State payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated,budgeted and otherwise made available. BOND REQUIREMENT 3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction.erection,repair,maintenance,or improvement of any building, road,bridge,viaduct,tunnel,excavation or other public works for this State,the contractor shall,before entering the performance of any such work included in this contract,duly execute and deliver to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the State,agood and sufficient bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one-half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract.Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified corporate surety,conditioned for the due and faithful performance of the contract,and in addition,shall provide that if the contractor or his subcontractors fad to duly pay for any labor,materials,team hire,sustenance,provisions,provendor or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in performance of the work contracted to be done,the surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the bond,togetherwith interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum.Unless such bond,when so required,is executed,delivered and filed,no claim in favor of the contractor arising under this contract shall be audited,allowed or paid.A certified or cashier's check or a bank money order payable to the Treasurer of the State of Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond,This provision is in compliance with 38-26.106 CRS, as amended. INDEMNIFICATION 4, To the extent authorized by law,the contractor shall indemnify,save and hold harmless the State,its employees and agents,against any and all claims,damages,liability and court awards including costs,expenses,and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor,or its employees,agents,subcontractors,or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract.DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957,as amended,and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices(24-34-402.CRS 1982 Replacement Vol,),and as required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirma- tive Action,dated April 16, 1975.Pursuant!hereto, the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or sub-contracts, During the performance of this contract,the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,creed,color,national origin,sex,marital status, religion,ancestry,mental or physical handicap,or age.The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during employment,without regard to the above mentioned characteristics.Such action shall include,but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading.demotion,or transfer,recruitment orrecruitment advertising;lay-offs or terminations:rates of pay or other forms of compensation;and selection for training,including apprenticeship.The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places,available to employees and applicants for employment,notices to be pro- vided by the contracting officer setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause. (2) The contractor will,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor,state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,creed,color,national origin,sex,marital status,religion, ancestry,mental or physical handicap,or age. (3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understand- ing,notice to he provided by the contracting officer,advising the labor union or workers'representative of the contractor's commitment under the Executive Ordcr, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,dated April 16, 1975,and or the rules,regulations,and relevant Orders of the Governor. — (4) '7he contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 19?5,and by the rules,regulations and Orders of the Governor.or pursuant thereto,and will permit access to his books,records,and accounts by the contracting agency and the office or the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such ivies,regulations and orders. (5) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in such labor organization,or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or discriminate against any of its member.in the full enjoyment of work opportunity,because of race,treed,color, sex, national origin,or ancestry. (6) A labor organization,or the employees or members thereof will not aid,abet.incite,compel or coerce the doing of any act defined in this contract to be dis- criminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder;or attempt either directly or indirectly,to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory. 395.53.01-1022 Revised 1/S8 page 16_._of 17__pages a-taaren.-ss 890395 Form 6-AC-02C (7) In the event of the contractor's non-compliance with the non-discrimination clauses of this contractor or with any of such rules,regulations,or orders,this contract may be cancelled,terminated or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in accordance with procedures,authorized in Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16,1975 and the rules,regulations.or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,and such other sanctions as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975,or by rules,regulations,or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph(1)through(8)in every sub-contract and subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations,or orders issued pursuant to Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16,1975,so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor,The contractor will take such action with respect to any sub-contracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct.as a means of enforcing such provisions,including sanctions for non-compliance;provided,however,that in the event the contractor becomes involved in,or is threatened with,litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the contracting agency,the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado. COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE 6a. Provisions of 8-17-101&102.CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract if public works within the State are undertaken hereun- der and are financed in whole or in part by State funds. b. When construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder,a resident bidder shall be allowed a preference against a non-resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or required by the state or foreign country in which the non-resident bidder is a resident.If it is deter- mined by the officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection.06 may cause denial of federal funds which would otherwise be avail- able or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law,this subsection shall be suspended,but only to the extent necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the inconsistency with federal requirements(section 8-19-101 and 102,CRS). GENERAL 7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the interpretation,execution and enforcement of this contract.Any provision of this contract whether or not incorporated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extra-judicial body or person or which is otherwise in conflict with said laws,rules and regulations shall be considered null and void.Nothing contained in any provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint,defense or otherwise.Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of this contract to the extent that the contract is capable of execution. 8. At all times during the performance of this Contract,the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws,rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established. 9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 18-8-301,et.seq.,(Bribery and Corrupt Influences)and 18.8.401,et.seq.,(Abuse of Public Office). CRS 1978 Replacement Vol., and that no violation of such provisions is present. 10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest whatsoever in the service or property described herein: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first above written Contractor: " acto" Board of County Commissioners (Full Legal Name) WP1 rl rot,rity STATE‘L.Cr By, /Kjri� OY OR C. W. Kerby, Cha an •syexec DURcro Position(Title) Leslie S. Fra 1 i n Social Security Number or Paled ID.Number DEPARTMENT OF (If Corporate ) Governor's J0D Iralmng uriice Attest(Seal) /9 14 • t`$y • PL.2 Corporate Secretary,or Equlvele .Tpw,vCityy/County Clerk APPROVALS ATTORNEY GENERAL CONTROLLER D, By VERIFIED INFORMATION COPY i hi. ,di y;Gwi .;u two copies or this contract h.et :,ear sixned by all State officiale. required by lac;t ,, t torfacts. Pie 17 which is the I..1 d 1;etee 195.5)-01.1010(Revised 1/NN) *See instruction on reverse side, DC-10-1J05.-ea 890395 *INSTRUCTIONS (1) Insert official Department designations.e.g.,Administration. Local Affiars,etc, as appropriate, (2) Set forth company(ies)or individual(s)names) and address(es). (3) Insert a brief statement indicating reasons for contract,e.g.,"The contractor having special knowledge,expertise and skill in diagnosing and testing diseases affecting cattle:and."Use as many"Whereas's"as required.If additional space is required continue to above words"NOW,THEREFORE;"and state"con- tinued on page 2". On page 2. state"Whereas continued front page 1"if required. (4) Specify clearly the goods or services contracted for,the consideration moving from one party to the other,the time within the contract is to be executed. limitations on assignments,if any,and special provisions desired.or required.Seek legal assistance when in doubt.Separate each principal item and number con- secutively using as many pages as necessary. (5) If a delegee signs for the Executive Director place the words"FOR THE"before the word"EXECUTIVE" Autographic,as distinguished from stamped,signatures should,as a minimum,be affixed to the original,which will be filed by the Division of Accounts and Control,and two counterparts,ono of which shall be transmitted to the contractor.If there is more than one contractor a copy so signed will be sent to each,thus requiring additional autographic signatures, Attachment 1 DEFINITIONS 1. APPLICANT (AN INDIVIDUAL) - An individual who applies to a JTPA Service Delivery Area (SDA) Grant Recipient or subrecipient for employment, training and/or ser- vices provided under JTPA. An applicant found to be eligible for the program re- mains an applicant until the provisions for "participant" have been met. If the applicant becomes a participant, this information becomes part o' the Participant record and subject to Federal record retention requirements. (See Participant.) 2. CERTIFICATION - The signature of the applicant must be obtained from the appli- cant attesting that the information on the application is true to the best of the applicant's knowledge and there is no intent to commit fraud. The signature should acknowledge that the information on the application will be used to deter- mine eligibility, that the applicant may be required to document the accuracy of the information and that the information is subject to external verification and follow-up information and may be released for such purposes. The signature should also acknowledge that, if found ineligible subsequent to enrollment, the applicant will be terminated. If the applicant is terminated as a result of fal- sifying information on the application, he/she may also be prosecuted for fraud. In the case of a minor (except minors who are heads of households) , the signature of a parent, guardian, or other responsible adult is required. 3. CERTIFICATION - EDWAA - A document provided by an SDA to an eligible dislocated worker verifying their status and authorizing continuing eligibility for a period not to exceed 104 weeks. 4. CITIZENSHIP - Designation of an applicant as a citizen of the United States or a lawfully-admitted permanent resident alien, lawfully-admitted refugee or parolee, and other individuals authorized by the Attorney General to work in the United States. if the applicant indicates that he/she is not a citizen or an "eligible noncitizen," the applicant is ineligible for JTPA. 5. COMPLETION OF TRAINING - The participant has met or achieved the minimum pre- . scribed period of training, as described in the training agreement in accordance with the Scope of Work of this Contract, and has attained the minimum level of performance or skill associated with the training activity. Completion of training also includes the attainment of one or more youth compe- tencies. One reimbursement for "completion of training" for each participant is allowable. The maximum number of participants to be reimbursed for "completion of training" which appears in the Schedule of Reimbursement cannot be exceeded. 6. CONTRACT - A procurement instrument by which GJTO, an SDA grant recipient, or a subrecipient pays for property, services, supplies, materials or equipment. 7. CONTRACTOR - Any person, corporation, partnership, public agency, or other entity which enters into a contract with the Governor's Job Training Office, an SDA grant recipient or a subrecipient under the Act. 8. ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED - An applicant is considered to be economically dis- advantaged if he/she meets one of the following: Page 1 of 5 590395 A. Families Receivino Public Assistance/AFDC - The applicant or the applicant's family and household received income or payments were made on behalf of the individual or the individual 's household by the state pursuant to the State of Colorado approved Title IV SSA State Plan. B. Families Receiving General Assistance - The applicant or the applicant's family is receiving state or local government cash assistance. C. Families Receiving Refugee Assistance - The applicant or the applicant's family is receiving income or money payments under the Refugee Assistance Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-212). D. Families Receiving Public Assistance - SST - The applicant or the applicant's family is receiving supplemental income or money payments pursuant to the Social Security Income for the Aged, Blind and Disabled). E. Annual Family_ Income Does Not Exceed OMB Poverty Level or 70 Percent of the Lower Living Income Level - The applicant is a member of a family which had an annual family income, in relation to family size and location, that did not exceed either (1) the most recently established poverty levels determined in accordance with criteria established by the office of Management and Budget (OMB) or, (2) 70 percent of the lower living standard income level , whichever is greater. F. Food Stamp Recipient - The applicant is receiving food stamps pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of 1977. G. Foster Child - The applicant is a child on whose behalf state or local govern- ment payments are eligible to be made to foster homes or other agencies pro- viding 24-hour care. This term also includes children who are reviewed pur- suant to Senate Bill 26. H. Adult Handicapped Individual - The applicant is an adult handicapped individu- al whose own income would meet the requirements for inclusion in one of the above items. I. Youth Handicapped Individual - May be considered a nondependent individual if the applicant is 14 or older and living with his/her family and receiving assistance from a state funded (see definition of state-funded program) pro- gram, and not one of the parents of the family. 9. EMPLOYED - An individual who, during the 7 consecutive days prior to application to a JTPA program, did any work at all : o As a paid employee; o Has his or her own business, profession or farm; or o Worked 15 hours or more as an unpaid worker in an enterprise operated by a mem- ber of the family; and any individual who was not working, but has a job or business from which he or she was temporarily absent because of illness, bad weather, vacation, labor-management dispute where the position has not been re- filled by management, or personal reasons, whether or not paid by the employer for time off, and whether or not seeking another jot. (This term includes mem- bers of the Armed Forces on active duty, who have been discharged or separated; participants in registered apprenticeship programs; and self-employed individu- als). 10. ENTERED TRAINING - The point of time at which a participant enters into any training activity allowable under the terms of the contract. Page 2 of 5 890395 r 11. FAMILY INCOME - The amount and source of all reportable family income for the prior 6 months; this is the total annualized family income when multiplied by two. The income of a spouse and/or other family members shall only be counted for that portion of .the income determination period that the person was actually a part of the family unit of the applicant. NOTE: For applicants who report an absence of income or other means of support, for the income determination period, have the applicant describe his/her specific circumstances. This may be done directly on the application in the space pro- vided. INCLUSIONS IN FAMILY INCOME: Gross Wages and Salary - The total money earnings received from work performed as an employee. It represents the amount paid before deductions for income taxes, social security taxes, bond purchases, union dues, etc. Net Self-Employment Income - Net income (gross receipts minus operating expenses) from a business firm, farm, or other enterprise in which a person is engaged on his/her own account. Other Money Income - Money received from sources such as net rents, pensions, alimony, governmental retirement payments, Armed Forces retirement payments . (other than compensation for disability or death, per Title 38, U.S.C. , Chapter 11) , income from insurance policy annuities, and other sources of income not in- cluded here. If a family's only source of income was from wages and salary payments, family income would be equal to gross wages and salary received. EXCLUSIONS FROM FAMILY INCOME: A. Non-cash income, such as food stamps, or compensation received in the form of food or housing. • B. Rental value of owner-occupied property. C. Public assistance payments. D. Cash payments received pursuant to a state plan approved under Title II, IV, X, or XVI of the Social Security Act of disability insurance payments received under Title II, Section 423, of the Social Security Act or under Old Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI). E. Federal , State, or local unemployment benefits. F. Payments made to participants in employment and training programs. G. Capital gains and losses. H. One-time unearned income, such as, but not limited tc: o Payment received for a limited fixed term under income maintenance programs and supplemental (private) unemployment benefit plans. • One-time or fixed-term scholarship and fellowship grants. o Accident, health, and casualty insurance proceeds. • Disability and death payments, including fixed-term (but not lifetime) life insurance annuities and death benefits. o One-time awards and gifts. • Inheritances, including fixed-term annuities. • Fixed-term worker's compensations awards. • Terminal leave pay. o Soil bank payments. • Agriculture crop stabilization payments. Page 3 of 5 890395 • - I. Pay or allowances previously received by any veteran while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces (U.S.). Also, exclude payments received for partici- pation in National Guard or military, naval , or air force reserve activities and VISTA stipends. J. Educational assistance and compensation payments to veterans and other eligible persons under Title 38, United States Code, Chapters 11, Compensation for Service-Connected Disability or Death; 13, Dependence and Indemnity Com- pensation for Service-Connected Death; 31, vocational Rehabilitation; 34, Veterans' Education Assistance; 35, War Orphans' and Widows' Educational Assistance; and 36, Administration of Educational Benefits. K. Payments received under the Trade Act of 1974. L. Black Lung payments received under the Benefits Reform Act of 1977 (PL 5-239, 30 USC 901). M. Child support payments. 12. HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUAL - An individual who has a physical or mental disability which for such individual constitutes or results in a substantial handicap to employment, excluding substance abuse. Refer to Economically Disadvantaged section for eligibility guidelines. 13. OLDER WORKER - A person who is 55 years or older, and is economically disadvantaged, may be considered a family of one for purposes of eligibility determination. 14. PARTICIPANT - Any individual who has: A. Been determined eligible for participation upon intake; and B. Enrolled in an activity. 15. PLACEMENT - The act of securing unsubsidized employment for or by a participant, as a paid employee of any legally authorized business, industry or enterprise including non-profit organizations. Paid employee means one who is carried on the employer's payroll/personnel records, is self-employed, is entered into a registered apprenticeship program or the Armed Forces. 16. SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRANT - If the applicant is a male citizen of the U.S. or other male person residing in the U.S. , who was born on or after January 1, 1960, and is between the age of 18 and 26, he must register. An applicant who is not registered will be ineligible for JTPA funded services until he has done so. 17. TRAINING - Activities which enable a participant to acquire the skills, abili- ties, knowledge, work habits, and/or procedures needed to obtain or enhance his/ her employment. 18. DISLOCATED WORKER - To be eligible for service under JTPA Title III , an individual must meet all of 'the following general criteria and at least one of the specific criteria listed thereafter: A. General Criteria • Citizens or Nationals of the U.S. or otherwise permitted by the U.S. Attorney General to work in the U.S. ; o Males born after January 1, 1960, who are between the ages of 18 through 26 must be registered with Selective Service; o Have a verifiable address but not necessarily residing in the state or Service Delivery Area (SDA) to which he/she is applying. Page 4 of 5 890395 B. Specific Criteria The applicant must: o Have been terminated, laid off, or received notice of termination/layoff from employment; and be eligible for or have exhausted his/her entitlement to unemployment compensation or equivalent separation compensation; and be unlikely to return to previous/primary industry or occupation. o Be terminated or notified of termination as a result of any permanent clos- ure of a plant or facility, or enterprise; or o Are long-term unemployed (15 weeks or more) and have limited opportunities for employment or reemployment in the same or a similar occupation in the area in which such individuals reside, including older individuals who may have substantial barriers to employment by reason of age; a person in this category may have been involuntarily unemployed for 15 weeks or more, or have been employed in "stop-gap" employment (i.e. , substantially below pre- vious wage or skill level); and have limited opportunities for employment in the area in their primary occupation; or o Having been self-employed (including farmers and ranchers) and are unem- ployed as a result of general economic conditions in the community in which they reside or because of natural disasters, subject to regulations pre- scribed by the Secretary. o Are displaced homemakers who have not worked outside the home for a substan- tial number of years, who were supported by another family member and are no longer receiving that support. Displaced homemakers who are not JTPA, Title II eligible, may be served under EDWAA 10% funds. • 890395 Page 5of5 FIRST READING - 5/8/89 ORDINANCE 118-I IN THE MATTER OF AMENDING AND DELETING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCES NUMBERS 118-G AND 118-H, THE WELD COUNTY PERSONNEL POLICY HANDBOOX, AS AMENDED. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, THAT PORTIONS OF ORDINANCES NUMBERS 118-G AND 118-H ARE AMENDED OR DELETED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado Statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, it is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has the power and authority under the Weld County Home Rule Charter and the Colorado County Home Rule Powers Act, Article 35 of Title 30, C.R.S. , as amended, and in specific, under Section 30-35-201 (7) , C.R.S. , as amended, to adopt by Ordinance, personnel policy rules and regulations for the County of Weld, and WHEREAS, Weld County Ordinances Numbers 118-G and 118-H, the Weld County Personnel Policy Handbook, as amended, became effective on March 29 , 1988 , and on June 27 , 1988, respectively, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County hereby finds and determines that there is a need to amend and delete certain portions of Weld County Ordinances Numbers 118-O and 118-H, the Weld County Personnel Policy Handbook, as amended, and that such amendments to and deletions from said Ordinances are for the benefit of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Weld County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of the Weld County, Colorado, that the following portions of Weld County Ordinances Numbers 118-G and 118-H, the Weld County Personnel Policy Handbook, as amended, are amended or deleted as follows: Amend paragraphs "D. " and "E." in the Section entitled "Jobs Programs" and found on page 11 of said Handbook, to read as follows: "D. Employment Services of Weld County - The Weld County Department of Human Resources places peo e I ■ _ Page 2 ORDINANCE 113-1 in various programs including in-school and summer youth, diversion or welfare diversion, etc. " ' "E. Useful Public Service - This program is limited to individuals required to perform useful public service in lieu of some other penalty. " Add the following paragraph in the section entitled "Exempt Positions" and found on page 13 of said Handbook: "FI. The District Attorney for the Nineteenth Judicial District and any and all assistants, deputies, and other employees of said District Attorney. " Add the following paragraphs entitled "Drug-Free Workplace" on page 13 of said Handbook, after the section entitled "Sexual Harassment. " DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE In accordance with the DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 , Weld County as a federal grant recipient is required to certify to the granting agency that we will ensure a drug-free workplace. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in suspension of the grant payments or termination of the grant payments or both. This requirement presents both a necessity and an opportunity to take immediate action to eliminate drug abuse from the workplace. To that end, the following policy is effective immediately. STATEMENT OF POLICY: It is the policy of Weld County to prohibit the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance during duty hours or on County premises or other work sites where employees may be assigned. Further prohibited is the use, sale, possession, distribution, dispensation, manufacture, or transfer of controlled substances during non-working time to the extent such use impairs an employee' s ability to perform his/her job or where such use, sale, possession, distribution, manufacture, or transfer affects the reputation of Weld County to the general public or threatens its integrity. Page 3 ORDINANCE 118-T Any employee found in violation of the above-stated policy will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination for a first offense. Excluded are prescribed drugs when used in the manner, combination and quantity intended, unless job performance could be affected. Employees who must use an over-the-counter or prescription drug that causes adverse side effects or may affect ability to perform work in a safe and productive manner must notify his or her supervisor prior to starting work. The supervisor or manager, after proper inquiry, will decide if the employee can remain at work and what work restrictions, if any, are deemed necessary. Compliance with the above-stated policy is a condition of employment for all employees of Weld County. Further, any employee who is convicted under a criminal drug statute for a violation occurring in the workplace or who pleads guilty or nolo contendere to such charges must notify the County within five (5) days of such conviction or plea. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action, including termination from employment for a first offense. Employees convicted or who plead guilty or nolo contendere to such drug-related violations are subject to termination and/or mandatory attendance and successful completion of a drug abuse assistance or similar program as a condition of continued employment. Change paragraph "P. " in the Section entitled "Conduct" found on page 14 of said Handbook to paragraph "Q. " Amend paragraph "G. " in the Section entitled "Conduct" and found on page 14 to state as follows: "G. Using, possessing, or selling alcohol or other intoxicants, or controlled substances during duty hours or on County premises or other work sites where employees may be assigned, or using, possessing, or selling alcohol or other intoxicants, or controlled substances during non-working time in a manner and to an extent which impairs an employee' s ability to perform his/her job or which affects the reputation of Weld County to the general public or threatens its integrity. " Page 4 ORDINANCE 118-I Add the following new paragraph "P. " in the section entitled "Conduct" and found on page 14 of said handbook: "P. Loss or suspension of driving privileges in those positions that require a valid driver' s license. " Delete all of the third full paragraph found on page 22 of said Handbook and add the following: "In those positions requiring a driver' s license, an employee may be suspended without pay upon knowledge by Weld County of an incident in which the license may be revoked or suspended. If the employee's license is not revoked or suspended, the employee may receive back pay. If the license is suspended or revoked for any period upon administrative hearing or upon conviction of a traffic offense or if the employee is determined by the Board of County Commissioners to be uninsurable, the employee will he terminated. " Amend the second full paragraph in the section entitled "Reporting of Injuries" and found on page 34 of said Handbook to state the following: "To be eligible for worker's compensation benefits, an employee must be examined and treated initially by the established Weld County Worker's Compensation primary medical care facilities. These medical facilities will be designated under separate cover and posted in all work areas. An injured employee should inform the provider that the billing for the treatment should be submitted to Weld County Worker's Compensation Fund. The supervisor will complete an Accident Investigation Report and the injured employee will be required to sign it. The Employer' s First Report of Accident form must be submitted to Personnel within 24 hours of the accident. The Accident Investigation Report must be submitted to the Personnel Office within 48 hours of the accident. " Delete all of the section entitled "Alcohol and Drug Abuse" and found on page 35 of. said Handbook. Amend the first paragraph in the section entitled "Educational Assistance" and found on page 36 of said Handbook to state the following: • Page 5 ORDINANCE 118-I "Weld County will reimburse an employee for tuition expenses up to $90. 00 per term (quarter/semester) for job related courses that have been approved in advance. Funds for this program are limited to the amount budgeted each year by the County Commissioners. For this reason, reimbursement is on a first come, first serve basis, and must be approved in advance to commit funds to an employee. For an employee to receive such reimbursement, the following conditions must be met: " Delete all of the paragraphs under the section "Key Elements of the Pay for Performance System" and found on page 45 of said handbook, and add the following: "KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PAY FOR PERFORMANCE SYSTEM - Key elements of the step approach include: - Five performance levels for employees (entry, qualified, proficient, third-year proficient, and fifth-year proficient) . - Appraisals to be completed at predetermined time-frames. " Amend the section entitled "Grandfathering" on page 45 of said Handbook to state the following: "GRANDFATHERING - The basic assumption was that no County employee would receive a decrease in pay due to conversion to the Pay for Performance System. Therefore, upon conversion, any employee whose base salary was above the job rate was allowed to retain that base salary upon conversion December 16, 1982. The Board will address grandfathered employees pay adjustments annually. " Amend the section entitled "E. Special: " found on page 51 of said Handbook to state the following: "E. Special : Special evaluations can be done for praise or reprimand at the department heads' /elected officials ' discretion. " Delete the sections entitled "Pay for Performance, " "Bonus Award Elements, " "Procedural Steps for Bonus Award, " and "Bonus Awards for Small Departments" all found on pages 52 , 53, and 54 of said Handbook. Page 6 ORDINANCE 118-I Amend the first full sentence in the section entitled "Group Health Insurance" and found on page 56 of said Handbook to state the following: "Group Health Insurance: All full-time employees are offered comprehensive major medical health insurance at the current deduction rate for single or dependent coverage designated by the employee. " Amend paragraph "A. " in the Section entitled "Retirement" and found on page 64 of said Handbook to state the following: "A. The employee must call the Personnel Department to schedule an appointment to fill-out required forms for retirement. When the employee calls for the appointment, Personnel will request the following information: 1. Last work day 2. Beneficiary 3. Birth date of beneficiary 4 . Social Security number of beneficiary" Amend paragraph "E. " in the Section entitled "Retirement" and found on page 64 of said Handbook to state the following: "E. Retirements are effective on the first day of the month following the last day worked. " Amend the term "Hourly Employees" under the section "General Definitions" and found on page 65 of said Handbook to state the following: "Hourly Employees: Hourly employees do not receive, nor are they eligible for, all County benefits. They are paid for hours worked only. " BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that this Ordinance 118-I shall become effective 5 days after its final public notice, as provided by Section 3-14 (2) of the Weld County Home Rule Charter. Page 7 ORDINANCE 118-I The above and foregoing Ordinance No. 118-I was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the day of , A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chairman BY: Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Branter George Kennedy County Attorney Gordon E. Lacy First Reading: May 8, 1989 Published: May 11 , 1989, in The New News Second Reading: May 22, 1989 Published: May 25 , 1989 , in The New News Final Reading: June 5, 1989 Published: June 8, 1989, in The New News Effective: June 13 , 1989 fir'• ..• w. . ., ..x. ' 1..tar STATE OF COLORADO � ' >';Y.. �:. T71r COUNTY OF WELD ) „•ISertit-t • PIMet,w.,.. wDavid B. Reynolds, being duly sworn, ca.ater�c°�e a says that he is publisher of the New ' ~ -'� orat News, a weekly newspaper published ' mesaZ in Xeonenburg in said County and als jUlag State; that said newspaper has a ✓' general circulation in said County 'U•. , and has been continously and t. li,tFue:rig uninterruptedly published therein, during a period of at least "id ZS fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to aid C the first publication of the annexed ormraV notice; that said newspaper is a riF:.'Nspu.mer within the meaning of the `nrMir = act of the General Assembly of the id a to .od State of Colorado, entitled "An Act °°R N "'id W to regulate the printing of legal. .s notices and advertisements, " and b.r..rz C amendments thereto; that the notice iphe of which the annexed is a printed �d r ie .W copy taken from said newspaper, was + •,� . 1� published in said newspaper, and in •�� ;� i A•�� .l the regular and entire issue of , . every number thereof , once a week art or for week ; that said notice was so published in said newspape proper 1p m • e a and not in any supplement thereof, and that the first publication of D"mHilt notice as aforesaid. was on the .aa 4=2 ' diwrjrba Q wut+w J.;.th day of May, 1959, and the last on the �: d some otb ry n wiles red ae,page filth duty of iy, 193_. 6 --r-iza.ii.,rh„pme.“4„ Subscribed and sworn before :.c'r� .. r.. • me this I day of May, 1989. • Ifeld . . a AIM eRrn•to • p.m "iterdri, 't Aieseigc_. N tea r yPublic a= y commission expire..a i'--1. .0 .ee .eraPPotrotty to to. Q( W.id '7 iw• � m '�Ir c ncei4 ai °ueo.�°� paw EEE! . >arb 6.: teme eu we use tmparb .n Etr" a61llq atov_Pwv. - .. _I :me: rf,. .� the pEr,or it eitW pp, ee art: 1/4dided.eirettoresatel Crt p.. when awed, to thy.,termer, Waaai W S. "lie 111.1989 amens eta or Tony`°' '°'k ate, e pity or m•o•• 'pr. after pW"•�Y•�ry� s�'r,�x-.-,q W4.°N'"ANGti rwill�l•at'If the erd�wba wa .eoep w q�omenes wed tlba restrictions, U any, are deemed drive • w7th ctahoe0l awe- availed, stated policy •11 ulpea loya�es ,. In•roer r •t ee who le owwloteb wider time t pease 45 of violatito •, • criminal Mid whonstatute wlfor ar • mud= on pendi in the to gs the nolo_�watpl ace o fd such nay thievery sip �Ni re '�A''"� was raN� The woWdeiMAIM o Mme by .MY for Poo( • far °eepwloyee whose • or w rate wile ay wee_to retain aGw�� nae the a nolo vWe « (jMowed- m 2Le rill telded Clone snot wp•�r,.�per terminetlan •md/or bry •dd tlf mnploYee• aad wwoem(m y ..malty drug ebuse tied "E a conditioner Inmate/ " aveatled :ate ll co• eedlm itedi wCa�lrohP'` In the Mend `E faond onStale Wt. lwoR:« , Section a pap 1{ old N•ndbok to aIeLVQrand t the Wy Q • m Ameod s0 [rr�a ,•14 o _dote tm �H d It▪ d "Cftelnna Mond ce+te or •Rieeiiiirneedwemions .p ;tin- .QeMrime—rare e week Ohs moor ar mooraed b am airy public Mesa me log Barkervike Or �� drhlag prelimsmet e . MN ;a3ookbarrean• Ill to state the pago's" IneuranceL All bran a are aft offered a mmaaatte et m nDerlete pyy of the Mt full da �o vrea efle drd6a.te4 said !(e om & the waeO�C• • t l�Ild drlvd(..s�. a wyne �wapawCm�oDl�oyae PlAY ympaoleg a W aL Onme bnowbiirtl Iogootre en to weiee t8e ty a an BB�to p be mITC _ry 9lwo the nvekpd a 11 toe anuIred ''�eentanse a''to Eill�wtut tee fllonaeiww a B Drain lo0ewme i rmatlt open or rovco�eedk aar any Suit dayp yr��at iii determ pylt wsn�pmy yyevr 4. �il a®6er of County C- 1m.i ion rs to be "R" b eke mnhwnetemloaftqte,tee employee,MI b and In Ne eecldlart pert� � nil gao▪lof er° `°'� w` the � " ° r wae Y `" ty LO Oe eYgIOM boa an u andam inthe este LWO Lcwlu..�"e 'be stye... k d mrcanwet tienitterforthemer°mw.le ° dam ita that al CamaW I��' .. lissemeee vy eea tiOn L'lR b npdnd motlon MtNo. uaaed a rte If.'Sdbt m•�ePtlrpaet Ada, he MO vote Co 110Lin tin;wDmppdd o FwThe tlreweaCd int accident ttlan 45 boon of the ib Maud Recorder ed awd Abuse" faed ( k riew:•e;{1e �� 116%vit�sy w FORM: pAyy{ytyapcme° 9�� 600•i Cry GtP. _ rte." s:Zooe a {ems ;sometime d(sap= t Q(mamr r{yyt will nt an per(Bpwdiog (leap Remmedy employee.to p.pp "Der term i'uW1ebN: nq' 1Ga1!Yad1kOw The ( ) { a for lappepelatteedd. New r. y�, -.pnppmm•▪,M -.eta' •tae Hew Nave empm{M�tl[el°dl gwm:re�'Y°MX theIs iv�w 'wa;e 6'�pb S10 rCowtuemt)�CaNnttinted a ainbd reetllw;aa.I LM+s_•. te Wye 'fit"' the lg�jsbe:e met: 'following t t1IEI IORAnDUr l iw C. W. Kirby, Chairman 11111 Board of County Commissioners 00. May 8, 1989 COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources i,1Q,Qy sub;«,: 1989 Purchase of Services Agreement Between Migrant Head Start and San Luis Valley Board of Cooperative Services Enclosed for Board approval is the Purchase of Services Agreement between the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Migrant Head Start Program and the San Luis Valley Board of Cooperative Services. (ROCS) The Migrant Head Start Program will be subcontracting with the San Luis Valley BOCS to provide services to 50 migrant children in the San Luis Valley during the period June 1, 1989 through September 30, 1989. BOCS will be reimbursed a maximum of $78,580.00 under this agreement. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3816. b _ a f viskyokYin h vr rr°: .( .. -'r 1ft k t TO: Clerk to the Board FR: Jeannie Ticker z.M RE: 1989 Purchase'.of Services � Y Agreement between Migrant Head Start:and San Luis Valley r; Board of Cooperative Services Enclosed for signature are three (3) Purchase of Services Agreements. Please • return two (2) of them when they are signed. ") If you have any questions, telephone me-at 353-3816. V „ rN d9)399 / / �. : PURCHASE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26th day of Aoril 1989, by and between the Board of County Commissio ers, by and through the Weld County Division of Human Resources' Migrant Head Start Program, hereinafter referred to as "Department," and the San Luis Valley Board of Cooperative Services, hereinafter referred to as "Delegate," is for the purpose of conducting activities of the Migrant Head Start Program during the period June 1st , 1989 through Sept. 30 , 1989. Funding for the program is provided by the Federal Administration for Children, Youth, and Families (ACYF--Migrant Head Start), hereinafter referred to as "ACYF," and is contingent upon availability of funds. The parties hereto agree as follows: A. Maximum Reimbursable Amount (MRA) 1. For satisfactory performance of the service requirements, the Delegate shall be reimbursed a Maximum Reimbursable Amount (MRA) of $78,580.00 to be paid with ACYF funds from the Department. The Delegate will be required to provide $19,645.00 as non-federal share. This non-federal share may be evidenced as "In-Kind" match for donated services, items, or cash. All valuation of donated services or items shall be reasonable. Fair market value is usually the appropriate valuation method. 2. All dollar amounts in this Agreement are maximum amounts. They shall be reduced by Department, if necessary, to match approved budgets and/or program earnings. 3. The consideration paid to Delegate, as provided in this Agreement, shall be full compensation for all Delegate's expenses incurred in the performance of this Agreement. 4. All funds to be awarded under this Agreement must be requested by Delegate and approved by Department prior to the commitment of expenditures. Formats for budget and supporting narrative shall be supplied by Department. B. Service Requirements/Reimbursement Rates 1. Delegate is funded to serve 50 eligible Migrant Head Start children and to generate 50 Child Days of Classroom Attendance (CDA). Delegate will be required to maintain average daily attendance of 85% throughout the program period of performance. 2. Registration is restricted to current migrants only. Delegate shall maintain at least 10% of enrollment as handicapped children. C. Program Earnings 1. Delegate may earn all of its approved ACYF expenditures up to its approved ACYF budget if it generates at least 85% of said days of classroom attendance. Classroom attendance includes only those days that the child is present in the classroom. It excludes all absences. 2. Department reserves the right to waive any reduction in earnings when 890399 Page Two unusual circumstances exist that prohibit Delegate from serving the number of children required or generating the required number of Child Days of Classroom Attendance. The granting of such a waiver shall be at the sole discretion of Department and may also be contingent upon approval by ACYF. D. Compliance Department expects Delegate to conduct all phases of program operation in accordance with Department and ACYF guidance documents and consistent with program goals and objectives. Delegate assures that: 1. the child eligibility, recruitment, and registration process, includ- ing criteria for handicapping conditions, is proper and complete 2. that centers reflect optimum child development opportunities 3. all child care facilities have been approved and licensed by the State of Colorado 4. that a system of individualized instruction is implemented 5. that health, nutrition, and safety needs of the child are attended to 6. that staff is selected with parent concurrence and reflects ethnic factors consistent with center enrollments 7. that viable parent participation and parent education programs are maintained 8. that a Parent Policy Committee is formed and provided with orientation, resources, and in-service activities necessary for its effective functioning 9. that self-assessment activities are conducted 10. that community resources are generated to the fullest extent possible 11. that staff training needs, including CDA, have been addressed 12. all activities authorized by this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the approved work program, the approve budgets, the grant conditions, and all relevant Department and ACYF directives E. Child Care Food Program Delegate assures that: all children shall be enrolled in the Child Care Food Program; appropriate filing for reimbursement shall be made; and Child Care Food Program revenue shall be reported to Department as it is received by Delegate. F. Facility Licenses Delegate assures that: all children shall be located in licensed centers or Family Day Care Homes; copies of all licenses shall be displayed in 890399 Page Three Delegate's centers; and copies of all current center licenses shall be submitted to Department prior to opening centers each program year. G. Insurance/Incorporation Requirements 1. Delegate shall provide Department with evidence of: incorporation, if applicable; all pertinent insurance policies, as required by department; fidelity bonds; Social Security; and other coverages required by federal and state regulations, upon request. 2. Delegate verifies that liability insurance at a limit of not less than $ shall be kept in force during the entire term of this Agreement. failure to maintain liability insurance in the limits stated above is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement. Said liability insurance shall include property and casualty, and errors and omissions coverage, and shall include as an additional named insured: Weld County, Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County and its employees. H. Out-of-State Travel Delegate shall not be reimbursed for any out-of-state travel expense without prior written approval of Department. I . Required Reports/Documents Delegate agrees to submit to Department or have on file such reports and other program data as may be required by ACYF or Department, including, but not limited to, the following: Code: s = submit to Department f = Delegate have on file 1. Pre-Program Operation Due date is prior to opening of first child care center. a. Evidence that all vacant positions were appropriately advertised and the selection process documented (f) b. A current list of all employees, including job titles (f) c. Copies of all center licenses (s) d. Copies of all pertinent insurance policies (s) e. Criteria for enrollment. Children must meet Migrant Head Start guidelines and be registered on appropriate form(s) furnished by Department. (f) f. Training/in-service schedule (f) g. Copy of Delegate personnel policies (f) h. The most recent community needs assessment for Migrant Head Start services (f) i . List of the names of the "Authorized Delegate Representative" at each site (s) 2. During Program Operation a. List of current parent officers and representatives at Center and Delegate level (f) 890399 Page Four b. Copy of the bylaws of the Delegate Parent Policy Committee (f) c. Copies of all contracts (f) d. Notification of any Delegate personnel changes for the positions of Executive Director or Migrant Head Start Director (s) 3. Monthly Due date is the fifth working day of the month, except where otherwise indicated. a. Child and family registration and eligibility documentation (f) b. Daily Attendance Records and Monthly Enrollment/Attendance Summaries (s) c. Copies of Health History and Physical Evaluations (due 15 days after completion) (f) d. Quarterly Reports (due as indicated on Department form) (s) e. Summary of staff and parent training and in-service sessions, including sign-in sheets from each Parent Policy Committee meeting (f) f. Copy of Child Care Food Program reimbursement claims (f) g. Delegate Agency Claim (due 15th of month for prior month) (s) h. PIR Monthly Report (due 15th of month for prior month) (s) i. Documentation of Handicaps of Children in Head Start programs (due 15th of month for prior month) (f) j. IMPD Head Start Categorical Diagnostic Statement (due within two weeks of identification (f) 4. Annually a. Program Self-Assessment Instrument (due date as instructed by Department) (s) b. Final Delegate Agency Claim (due 30 days following closure of last attendance site (s) c. Equipment Inventory (due 30 days following closure of last attendance site) (s) Failure of Delegate to submit and/or have available on file any of the reports listed above in a complete, accurate, and timely manner shall be sufficient cause for Department to delay payment of any or all funds then due Delegate until such time as the required reports are submitted or available to and accepted by Department. J. Annual Program Review 1. Delegate shall annually conduct a Program Self-Assessment to assess compliance and quality. The documents to be used shall be the Department Program Self-Assessment Instrument, and such other formats as may be required. 2. Training shall be provided by Department to key Delegate staff and by Delegate to parents and staff who are to complete the format at each Center and Delegate level . 3. Delegate understands and agrees that Delegate shall he responsible for developing a written plan outlining strategies for corrective actions for each non-compliance item, as determined by Department, and that 890399 Page Five failure to develop and implement such a plan may result in Department not offering an Agreement to Delegate in ensuing years. K. Participation in Department Functions Delegate agrees to participate in Department coordination functions that are consistent with the goals of the program and necessary for the Department to discharge its responsibility to ACYF. L. Maintenance of Records 1 . Delegate shall prepare and maintain appropriate fiscal , programmatic, management, personnel , and property record. 2. Delegate shall permit Department and/or agents of ACYF to review, evaluate, and/or audit said records as deemed necessary for purposes of monitoring compliance with this Agreement. 3. All records shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years after completion of the Agreement period. M. Property Management 1. Title to equipment and/or supplies purchased with Department funds rests with the Delegate only so long as this Agreement is in effect. Upon termination of this Agreement, title to all equipment and remaining supplies shall revert to the Department, in trust for ACYF. 2. A perpetual property inventory of all equipment purchased with ACYF funds shall be maintained by Delegate containing the following minimum information: description, including intended use and estimated useful life; manufacturer's serial number or identification number; asset number, acquisition date; original cost; vendor name and address; location of item; percent of ACYF funds used to purchase item; condition; and ultimate disposition data. A physical inventory shall be completed not less than annually. Discrepancies between physical inventory and property records shall be noted and any differences shall be reconciled. 3. Any unit of equipment costing over $500.00 and having a useful life expectancy of two (2) years or more and purchased with ACYF funds shall have prior written authorization from the Department and ACYF. The ACYF definition of equipment purchased with ACYF funds shall apply to all property. 4. Written approval must be given by Department in order for Delegate to dispose of any item costing over $500.00 and having a life expectancy of more than two (2) years. N. Agency Reimbursement Funds shall be disbursed to Delegate according to the following schedule, subject to the receipt of funds by Department from ACYF: 1. Delegate shall file a monthly Agency Claim of actual expenditures with Department no later than the 15th of the following month. Ss399 Page Six 3. Department reserves the right to refuse payment of amount due Delegate until Department is satisfied Delegate has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement, including filing of all required reports and correction of audit deficiencies. 4. The final payment under this Agreement, based upon actual earnings and expenditures, shall be made by Department no later than thirty (30) days after the close of the program year. Any overpayment to Delegate shall be refunded to Department within thirty (30) days. 6. Delegate shall report all Child Care Food Program reimbursements received and shall reduce the actual expenditures reported on the Agency Claims by the amounts received from the Child Care Food Program. 7. Delegate agrees to submit all final Agency Claims no later than thirty (30) days following the date of closing of all centers operated by Delegate. 0. Savings Clause If any term or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such term or condition shall be deemed invalid, but all other terms and conditions shall continue in full force and effect. P. Termination of the Agreement 1. Breach of Contract If Delegate materially breaches any provision of this AGreement, the Department may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to the Delegate. Any one of the following specific actions by Delegate shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. They include, but are not limited to: a. Non-compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, or requirements b. Submission of false, misleading, or erroneous information to the Department c. Failure to maintain required records d. Administrative mismanagement e. Denial of access by authorized representatives of the Department to all program-related or fiscal records during normal work hours f. Failure to timely complete an audit for the previous year's Agreement g. Lack of fiscal accountability h. Unsatisfactory performance under terms and conditions of this Agreement 2. Immediate Termination The following documented actions of the Delegate shall result in immediate termination: a. Fraud or conspiracy to defraud 390399 Page Seven b. Misuse of ACYF funds in violation of the applicable regulations c. Embezzlement d. Maintenance of an unsafe or unhealthy physical environment for children e. Abuse or molestation of children f. Failure to report suspected child abuse or molestation g. Theft of supplies, equipment, or food h. Operating in violation of safety and health regulations, and therefore creating imminent danger to the health and welfare of children 3. Change in State or Federal Regulations or Laws If federal or state laws or regulations are changed to prohibit the performance of the Department's obligations under a federal or state grant by contracting with Delegate, Department may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) day's written notice to Delegate. Q. Hold Harmless Clause Each of the parties hereto shall be solely liable for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees occurring in the performance of this Agreement. If either party becomes liable for damages caused by its employees, it shall pay such damages without contribution by the other party. R. Subdeleqation 1. No portion of the program operation or of program funds shall be subdelegated or otherwise contracted by Delegate without prior written authorization of the Department. 2. All subcontracts are subject to audit as required by the Department. 3. The subcontractor and its agents and employees, in the performance of the subcontract, are acting in an independent capacity and not as officers, agents, or employees of the Department. 4. The Delegate and its agents and employees, in the performance of a subcontract, are acting in an independent capacity and not as officers, agents, or employees of the Department. S. Alterations No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral misunderstanding or agreement not incorporated in this Agreement shall be binding on either party. T. Nondiscrimination Requirements 1. During the performance of this Agreement, Delegate shall not deny the benefits specified under the terms of this Agreement to any eligible child or family on the basis of religion, color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, or physical or mental disability, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for 890399 Page Eight employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, age, or sex. 2. Delegate shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code, Section 12900 et seq.) , the regulations promulgated thereunder (California Administrative Code, Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.) , the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Government Code, Sections 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the awarding agency to implement such article. U. Nepotism Prohibition Delegate shall not employ, hire, or otherwise compensate, directly or through contract, any member of the board of directors or any immediate family member of any member of the board of directors. Nor shall any private Delegate employ, hire, or otherwise compensate, directly or through contract, any individual occupying control over the Delegate's fiscal affairs when such individual is an immediate family member of any supervisor, executive director, or board member. V. Audit Requirements 1. Delegate's financial and business activities, procedures, and records shall be audited annually by an outside audit firm approved by Department. Said audit shall be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state laws, regulations and audit guidelines. The cost shall be paid by Department. 2. Delegate agrees to correct all audit findings, if any, to the satisfaction of the Department and ACYF. Corrective procedures recommended in the audit report will be reviewed by Department with Delegate, and a deadline date for implementation shall be established by Department. 3. Delegate shall be responsible for any monetary losses as the result of any audit exception or disallowance caused by, or as a result of, Delegate's lack of performance as required by this Agreement. W. Annual Agreement Renewal The completion of an Agreement by Delegate does not grant vested rights to subsequent Agreements. Delegate shall be notified of renewal criteria during the annual contract review process. X. Open Meetings Delegate's governing board meetings shall be open to the public, except for meetings to: consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of an employee; or to hear complaints or charges brought against an employee, unless such employee requests an open meeting. Minutes of all board meetings shall be available to the public, except for minutes taken at meetings to: consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of an employee; or to 890399 Page Nine hear complaints or charges brought against an employee, unless such employee has requested an open meeting. Public agencies shall comply with Government Code Section 54959 et seq. and other applicable laws and regulations. Y. Amendment of Agreement The terms and conditions of this Agreement are subject to approval and possible amendment by state and/or federal agencies having jurisdiction over program and funding. DEPARTMENT: DELEGATE: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SAN LUIS VALLEY BOARD OF COOPERATIVE SERVICES "124-51- • • -----' C. W.r irby, h rman ,Gary Mix SLV BOCsp43:#72:__ A---$e WELD COUNTY VISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES k r P . ATTEST: Weld Ciounty Clerk and Oj Recorder and Clerk to a Board WaExec pel tivt Director r� IrFrxi,� ; , 4 aca� O puty County Ller 890399 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/03/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 AS OF : 05/03/89 • WARRANT PAYEE LNVULCE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110259 AGLANO INC A27539 61 -9020-6246 652. 10 • J0925 61-9020-6240 2,783.58` • 3;435.68 • A110260 BUREAU OF BUS PRACTICE 050289 01-1154-6330 74 .28 • 74.28 • • A110261 COLORADO DEPT OF REVENUE LiCFOO 19-4170-6599 60.00 • • 60.00 • • A110262 FUNKEN; PAUL N. D. FPO501 19-4140-6350-FP - 64.00 • 64.00 • e A110263 JEROME CO 1113124 86-2J11-6250-COMM 213.96 • 131248 86-2311-6220 9.94 • 223.90 • • _ A110264 K-MART 34350 52-5520-6220 34.78 • 34.78 • • A110265 KENNEDY. CHRIS K. D. FP0501 19-4140-6350-FP 61 . 25 • • 61.25 • • A110266 NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE BLRS 89/90 01-1021-6410 267.75 • 267. 75 • • A110267 PETTY CASH-AMBULANCE 5249 60-2160-6460 41 .90 • • 41 .90 • e • • • • • ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/03/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 AS OF : 05/03/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMDER FD DEPT ODJ PROJ AMOUNT • • AII0260 SCHELTINGA1 UREM 050189 01-3182-6370 94.49 • 94. 49 • • AT10269 STATE OF COLORADO KEGS 19-4170-6350-I 25.00 • • 25.00 • • A110270 THREE M XPW64J9 VAddbb 01-1021-6360 600.00 • 600.00 • • A110271 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 2945 01-1152-6370 340 .59 • 340.59 • • • FINAL TOTAL : 6 .323. 62 • • • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • O ■ s • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY UATE : 05/07/8941 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE ,: 3 AS OF : 05/0J/d9 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROOECURES HAVE BEEN • • COMPLETED UN THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 2 . AND • DATED 05/01/091 AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD DE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 5..323. 62 . • DATED TN 5 8th /DAY OF Mai 19 89 _- . •...a1L• • UIREC 0 OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED ANU SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 8th DAY OF May i9 89 . • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : My Commission Exp[rsLune8, 1990 • • NOTARY—P LIC • WEI THE DOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • (APPROVE; ( DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREUY ORDERED ORAWN UPON • THE General FUND - TOTALING $ 5023.82 • DATED THIS 8th DAY OF May 1989 . 41evankA) 4. • COUNTY LCRK A11D RECORDER BY • 41 "------,._.,. -O4..:O3.-AIL.4-- -11%-e-w4 -) C.Q1.25Lii( 41 DEPUTY CHAIRMAN MEMBER -6 MEMBER41 wev 41 -74/41 •�� iSfadd,., 41 MEMBER MEMBER41 • • • • • • ID e WAP2009 WELD COUNTY GATE 05/04/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS Of : 05/04/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ID DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110272 ALL-PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY 324663 01- 1061-6236-CC 109. 30 • 324701 O1- 1061-6236-CC 88.52 • 197.82 41 41 I A110273 ALLIED SURGICAL SUPPLY 186662 19-414.)-6212-CDP 86. 00 . 186689 19-4140-6212-MAT 135. 64 • 221 . 64 • • A110274 ART UGPARTMENT ( THE) 040481 19-4130-6229-GHE 35.00 • 35.00 • • A110275 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCT 3079SB 19-4170-6250-GNRL 497. 72 • 307931 19-4170-o250-MDIA 33.87 ' • 531 .59 • • A110276 ORATION' S ; INC 888246 21-b950-6940 2 ,637. 99 • 01527 01- 1127-6210 18. 54 01510 01-1123-6210 45.02 • 01591 21-6950-6210 26. 88 • 01592 21-6480-6220-79d 16. 36 01593 01-2310-6220- ISOP 143. 10 • 01594 Oi- 1123-6210 23.44 • 01595 01- 1123-6210 3. 11 • 01012 19-41106940 116.93 • 01613 01-1041-6210 19. 59 01614 11-3140-6229 174. 08 S 01615 01-1021-6210 606.06 . 01692 01- 1041-6210 18. 64 • 3 .849. 94 41 • A1102.77 BRODART 1hC P74230 52-5510-6220 33.54 • 33.54 • • A110273 BUCKEYE WLUNG SUPP CO INC 13333 01-2990-6210 18 . 11 41 41 41 41 1 i i I I I . I I I I I I I I • rommilmw ID ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 Ill WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 AS OF : 05/04/09 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCGUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID • • A110278 BUCKEYE WLDN41 SUPP CO INC 18. 11 • • A110279 BUTLER PAPER 007004 64-1155-6250-PAPR 31556.66 e 3 ,556. 66 • • A110200 CADOYLAK SYSTEMS INC 301812 01 -2110-6210-RECO 106.43 • 106 . 43 • A1102211 CANON) INC. 145960 21-6960-6367 816.00 • • 816.00 • • A110282 CIOOLO MFG. INC . 6422 Ot-2990-6360 52.60 . 52. 60 ill • A110264 COMMERCIAL MAINT G SUPPLY 207116 01-1061-6250-VAC 10.97 • 10. 97 • • A11O284 CONTECt1 COUSIN PRODUCTS 830400 11-7190-6471 4, 239.50 Al • 4 ,239 .50 . • A110205 CUPYWORLU 8403 11-3140-6229 168 . 57 • 0920 11-3140-6229 206. 03 • 374. 60 . • A110206 CORER PRINTING 12112 19-4140-6320-HIV 27 .00 • • 12110 19-4130-6320- IP 10.00 15235 01-2111-6220-NOPT 240.00 • 15284 21-6510-6320-9 21 . 00 41 152435 01-2420-6210 24 .00 17109 01-2420-6210 46. 00 • e • • • s . I i. e • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 AS OF : 05/04/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT ID ID A110286 CONCH PRINTING 6967 21-6950-6320 6.00 • 7164 21-6510-6320-9 32.00 ID 21-6640-b320-d 24.00 • 472.00 • • A110287 CURTIN MATHESON SCI INC 306627 I9-4170-6250-GNRL 84.91 • 307392 19-41706250-GNRL 9. 11 311517 19-4170-6250-GNRL 30.22 • 411 124.24 ID 4110288 CUSTOM COMPUTER INSTALLA- 1090 65- 1191-6220 55. 00 0 • 55. 00 • • A11O289 DATA DOCUMENTS E35165 65-1191-6220 44. 33 • 44.33 41 II A11O290 DINGO SUPPLY INC D469d1 65-1191-6212 47.09 • ID 47.09 I e AI10291 DENVER SURGICAL SUPPLY 53392 19-4140-6212-MAT 9.32 • 53947 19-4140-6212-WAP 83.20 • 54105 19-4140-6250-MED 245.25 ID 54215 19-4140-6212-MAT 110 . 28 • 448. 05 • • A110292 DESKS; INCURPORATE0 055079 21 -6950-6940 9 /040. 50 • 9 /680.50 ID ID A11O293 DOTY' S PEST CONTROL SERV 005d8O 01-1061-6360-CC 15. 00 • 005881 21-6700-6230-9 10.00 . 25.00 • • - ID IP • 0 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY OATS : 05/04/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 AS OF : 05/04/89 • ►'ARRANT PAVEL INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • 41 A110294 ECONOMY LUMBER 6 HARDWARE 341970 01-2310-6220- )SOP 33.92 • 342142 01-1061-6360-CC 54. 37 • 88. 29 • • A110295 rtsmER SCIENTIFIC CO 840776 19-4170-6250-GNRL 325. 71 • 852123 19-4170-6250-GNRL 78.49 41 853540 19-4170-6250MDIA 87. 50 863232 I9-4170-6250MDIA 84 .00 41 575.70 • • A110296 FOX SUPPLY 182797 01-1061-6235-CC 130. 10 O 182842 01-1061-6360-CC 59. 15 • 185704 01-IO6l-6233-CC 170.93 . 360. 18 • 41 A110297 FT. COLLiNS WINTRONIC CO 031110 01-1001-6236-CC 13.89 • 13.89 • A110298 GARRETSON' S SPORT CENTER 70219 01-2310-6220- ISDP 28.95 • • _ 28. 95 . • A110299 GAYLORD BROS INC 120196 52-5510-6220 31 .82 . 31 .82 • • A110300 CORDON'S LIQOUR MART 6629 19-4170-6250-GNRL 38.37 • • 38. 37 • • A110301 GRAYUAR ELECTRIC CO INC 602264 67-1192-6945 227 .90 • _-__ _ 227.90 • • • • 41 • 41 IP ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : S AS OF : 05/04/J9 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110402 GREELEY LUCK £ KEY 31229 60-2160-6360 29.70 • 29.70 • A110404 GREELEY PRINTING CO 3700 01-1011-6320 15. 00 • • 15. 00 • • A110404 MAROON SERVICE CORP. 178001 01-2310-6220-15CP 11304 .00 • 11304 .00 • • A1103J5 JOHNSON CONTROLS 401713 01-1061-6233-CC 86.00 • • 86 . 00 • A110306 K-HART 907023 19-4140-6221-FP 14. 73 • • 14. 73 41 • A11OJ07 KRAFT/WESTMAN 01147 21-6600-6229-9 1 ►6. 40 • 116.40 • • A11030d LARIHER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 6290 61-1945-6940 811195.00 • 8500 •1 , 19 . • A110409 LAW ENF EQUIP CO 218722 01-2111-6940INVT 2 ,945.65 • • 2 ,945. 65 • • A110310 LONGS DRUGS 011855 01 -2111-6220-LA8 10.04 • 011860 01-2111-6220-LAU 3. 00 011866 OI -2111 -6220-LA8 2.62 • 011878 01-2111-6220-LAB 5. 25 • 20.41 • • • • • • ID ID • WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 AS OF : 05/04/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID ID A110311 MACKENZIE MANUFACTURING 8649 60-2160-6940 11748. 48 • 11748. 48 • • A110412 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIESI INC. 179695 21-6600-6222-9 19.37 • 212640 01-2310-6222-KTFD 95. 76 el 213071 01-2310-6222-KTFD 82.99 213938 01-2310-6222-KTFD 44.69 • 21396♦ 01-2330-6222 17.50 214004 01-2310-6222-KTFD 102. 14 • 214003 01-2370-6222 17.59 • 214435 01-2310-6222-KTFD 89.38 . 215345 01-2310-6222-KTFD 51 .07 215346 21-6600-6222-9 143.29 • 215371 01-2330-6222 13.40 . 215386 21-6600-6222-9 77.47 215411 01 -2710-6222-KTFD 102. 14 • 215412 01-2330-6222 13. 12 . 215779 01-2310-6222-KTFD 70.22 216980 OI -2310-6222-KTfU 51 .07 • . 991 .20 . A110313 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES/ INC . 216981 21-6600-6222-9 116.21 • 217008 01-2330-6222 13. 12 • 217023 21 -6600-6222-9 77.47 217050 01-2310--6222-KTFD 108. 53 • 217051 01-2330-6222 11 . 59 • 217420 01-2310-6222-KTFD 38. 30 • 218805 01-2310-6222-KTFD 44 .69 218834 01-2730-6222 17.59 • 214877 01-2330-6222 17.59 • 451 .09 • • A110314 MIU:ILST SIGN i. SCREEN 441090 60-2160-6229 128 . 77 • . 128 . 77 . . A110315 MONARCH PLUMS SUPPLY CO 21732 01-1061-6233CC 116. 81 . 116.81 • • A 41 • • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/04/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 AS OF : 03/04/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110316 NATIONAL GRAPHICS COHPANY 093341 01-1041-6210 141 . 32 • 41 141 .32 • • A110117 NAIL SHERIFF 'S ASSOC 011605 01-2110-6220- TRNG 625.00 • 625 .00 . • AIIOJl8 NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY 43003 01-2420-6210 43.14 . ♦3. 1♦ • • 11110319 NEWCO INC 13483 01-1061-6236-CC 72. 00 • 22356 01-1061-6360-CC 243.00 • 22480 01-1061-6233-CC 1 ,010.94 22722 01-1061-6236-CC 865.30 • 2, 191 .24 • • A110320 NORTHERN COLD PAPER CO 062109 19-4140-6250-GEN 42. 10 • • 42. 10 • • A110321 OFFEN ACE HARDWARE O'i896 60-2.160-6229 37.66 • 09792 11-3140-6229 40.63 10695 01-9020-6760 39.58 • • 117.87 • • A110J22 USCU DRUG COMPANY 280698 19-4130-6220-GHE 39.80 • 39. 80 • • A110323 PARKS MEDICAL ELECTRONICS Ad9005 19-4140-6940-MAT 330.22 • 330 . 22 • • A110324 PIONEER PRESS OF GREELEY 009788 01-1123-6320 209. 45 • • • • • • w OM iMh 41 e • WAP200P WELO COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 AS Of : 05/04/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110J24 PIOBL'Ec PRESS Of GREELEY 209. 45 • I • A110323 PREFERRED CORRECTIONAL 042489 01-2310-6350-MONC 270. 00 • II 270 .00 • • A110326 ROCKY MOUNTAIN PHOTO 4110 01-2310-6236-SUEL 27 . 00 • 27 . 00 • • ATIOJ27 SAFEHAY STORES INC 152237 21-6850-6229-9 2 . 07 • • 2 . 07 • • A110J2d SENTRY FIRE- G SAFETY INC 20571 01-2111-6361-NOPT 6 . 25 • 6 . 25 • • A110J29 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 47075 01-2410-6398 3 ,603.95 • 47076 01-2310-6398 3 ,672. 59 • 47077 01-2310-6398 3 ,503.60 47078 01-2310-6398 3 ,568. 10 • 14 ,348. 24 • • A110140 SETUN NAME PLATE CORP 8o0460 01-1061-6360-CC 80.31 • • 80.31 • • A110311 SHEF ENTERPRISES, INC . 48276 19-4140-6212 175.00 • 175.00 • • AIlOJJ2 SHERIIIN-WILLIAMS CO 743514 01 -1061-6234-CC 32 . 18 • 32. 18 1 • • • • • ID ` • WAP200P MELO COUNTY GATE 05/04/89 IDNAARANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 AS OF : 05/04/69 • WARRANT PAYEL INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMUER MONSER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • AlI03JJ SIGMA CHEMICAL COMPANY 101945 19-4170-6250-MOIA 50.50 • 1433620 19-4170-6250-MUTA 96. 50 • 147 .00 • - • A110SJ4 SLIMS' SANITATION SERVICE 14843 11-3140-6229 900.00 • 900.00 • • • FINAL TOTAL : 135, 191,64 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • ID u _ 4 47 ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/89 • WARMANT REGISTER PAGE S 10 AS OF : 05/04/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • • CUMPLLTED ON THE 'WOOL LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE l THROUGH 9 i AND • DATE0 05/04/89) AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD dE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPJSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 135,197.64 • fi ID UATED THIS Y OF MAY 19 89 _. • _ _ • DIRECTOR FINANCE AND ADMIhISTRAILOh SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 8 DAY OF MAY 19 89 . • My Comm[ssion Excires June 8. 1490 • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES :I . • ID NOTARY4PUBL IC • WED IRV DO9RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY , COLORADO, HEREBY • ( APPROVEI (DLSAP?ROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH A80VEi AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • • THE GlS&1t. FUND - TOTALING S__JLm„jg1.&(____ • DAT =0 THIS _$____ DAY OF Sr 19 $,9 . • • COUNTY LERR AND RECORDER dY • • _ -..,-J/Azet--t-* DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • • Z. ! • I -�� a _�_� - -- BER MENDER---- - -e- - l Aria: • MEMBER MENDER • • • • • • • r I - ID . . • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT ODJ PROD AMOUNT • • 4110335 AAA TRAVEL AGENCY 355152 21-6800-6373-9 382 .00 • 382.00 O • A110336 AMER PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 16206 01-1061-6330 60. 00 • • 60.00 • A110337 ARELLANO} CONNIE MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 68.74 • 68.74 • • AII0338 ARMSTRONG} KRIS MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 13.28 • 13. 28 • • A110339 AT&T 000134 67-1192-6533 8. 10 • • 8. 10 • A110340 AVANT GARDE STUDIO 663392 01-2110-6320-ADM 196. 25 • 890424 01-2111-6220-SOPT 119. 66 • • 315. 91 • • A/ 10341 BAE2A. LEE ANN MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 14. 96 • 14.96 • • A110342 BATT} PHYLLIS 050589 79-1031-6143 56.07 • 56.07 • • A110343 DAUER RICHARD M TM1219 01-2111-6220-INVT 5. 12 • • 5. 12 . • • • • • • i i I I I I I I I I i I ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 1 2 • - AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT A110344 SEARS CAR WASH G STORAGE 03319 01-1123-6361 21 .00 • 21 .00 • • A110345 BRATTON'S, INC 889543 64-1155-6250-OFSU 563.30 0 01505 21-6980-6220 87.60 i • 650.90 • A110346 BRISTOL i ROBINSON PROP 2287114 24-9044-6397-4715 189.00 3830W5 24-9034-6397-4715 171 .00 • 360.00 O A110347 BRODA) RONALD J MI0489 01-2990-6370 190.92 • 190.92 • • A110348 BRUMLEY. SMARA 0420M1 01-1041-6370 305.00 • 305.00 A110349 BURCH. JILL MG0427 19-4130-6370-INJ .60 • 0422 19-4140-6370-CNP .60 • 0423 19-4140-6370-TB .80 0424 19-4140-6370-CNP 16.00 • 0425 19-4140-6370-WAP 7.60 • 0426 19-4130-6370-WELL 2.20 • 27.80 • • A110350 BUTLAND, GEORGE 23362 01-2420-6599 723.00 • 723.00 • A110351 CENTRAL WELD CNTY WATER 75 01-1061-6340-ROAD 22.50 • 22.50 • • • • • IP • • WAP2OOP MELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT 0 41 A110352 CENTURY PAPERS 450168 01-1061-6250-VAC 865.30 • 160382 01-1061-6250-VAC 132896 --- - . 998.26 41 41 A110353 CITY OF GREELEY 04945 64-1155-6320 431 . 21 • 431. 21 • • A11035♦ CJC/COLO JUVENILE OFFICE B6SQ89 01-2110-6370-TRNG 280.00 • 05039 01-1125-6330 75.00 • 355.00 • • A110355 CLARKE DIVISION RI0385 01-1061-6250-VAC 2.38 0 • 2.38 • • A110356 CMS ELECTRIC 26504 01-2420-6599 102.00 • 102.00 • == 41 A110357 COLORADO DISTRICT 15489 01-1123-6530 150.00 • 150.00 • • A110358 CONDON. BILL ST0489 21-6840-6372-9 332.50 • • 332. 50 • A► 10359 CONNECTING POINT N50888 24-9043-6360-4400 136.80 • 50888N 24-9043-6360-4400 121 .31 • 0 258. 11 . • A110360 COOKE, JOHN 541041 01-2111-6220-SOPT 5.00 • 5.00 41 0 41 0 ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05189 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 IP 41 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 4 NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT ODJ PROJ AMOUNT A110361 CRAWFORD SUPPLY COMPANY 161222 86-2311-6220 108.0♦ • 161223 86-2311-6250-COMM 260. 20 161476 86-2311-6250-COMM 67.56 • I61477 86-2311-6220 60.00 ID 495.80 • • A110362 DAHLGREN T.V. 000609 01-1123-6599 35.00 • • 35.00 • A110363 DEEP ROCK 04289 01-1125-6210 45.30 ID 45.30 A110364 DEJONN INVESTMENT CO. INC 490W05 24-9034-6397-4715 100 .00 • 100.00 • • A110365 DELOITTE HASKINS S SELLS 042589 01-9020-6350-AUDI 6 '000.00 • • 6.000.00_ IP A110366 DILL, RICK 050589 79-2110-6143 - 49.60 . 49.60 ID ID A110367 DIVINE, CHERYL M10489 21-6510-6372-9 62.42 62.42 • • A110368 DON'S MAINTENANCE SERVICE 1945 61-9020-6371 17. 75 • *952 6►-9020-6371 31 .96 • 49. 71 • • A110369 EASTMAN KODAK CO M31261 64-1155-6360 289 .16 • • 289. 16 ID ID Ill ID 0 • 41 • MAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 1 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110370 EASTMAN KODAK CO 11797 60-2160-6599 334.00 • 334.00 • • A110471 EASTSIDE LIQUOR 000604 0►-1123-6599 28.41 • • 28.41 • • A110372 ECONOMY LUMBER L HARDWARE 419702 01-2110-6220-ISOP 37. 19 • 37. 19 • 0 A110473 ELCAR FENCE COMPANY 27563 01-2420-6599 3.50 • _ _ -- 3.50 • 411037♦ ELDERGARDEN 5T0189 21-6810-6358-9 874.09 • ST0289 21-6810-6358-9 11008.09 • 11882. 18 • a • A110375 ELLSWORTH1 CAROL JEAN 050589 79-4410-6143 127. 11 • • 127. 11 • • 4110376 EVANS RANDY 050589 79-1191-6143 255.50 • 255.50 • • A110377 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE 65742 01-2110-6315-WARR 282.00 • 65743 01-2110-6315-MARR 282.00 • 65744 O1-2110-6315-WARA 282.00 65805 01-2110-6315-WARR 684.00 • 65806 01-2110-6315-WARR 684. 00 • 65807 O1-2L10-6315-MARR 340.00 • 2 ,554.00 • • • • 0 • • 41 • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • AI10378 FAHRENSRUCH1 HAROLD MI489 01-1110-6370 43.60 • ---------43.60 • • A110379 FAMILY PHYSICIANS CLINIC MAR 89 19-4140-6350-T8 264.00 • • 264.00 • A110380 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 148055 21-6650-6311-9 29.25 • 23528A OI-1151-6310 11 .00 • 235288 01-1123-6310 12.00 . 23528C 01-1151-6310 12.00 • 64.25 • A110381 FOSTER BARBARA MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 178.00 PP0489 21-6510-6345-9 1 .25 • 539207 21-6510-6377-9 29.75 • 209.00 • • A11O382 FREIDERICH1 MARY 05029 01-1127-6370 61 .36 • 61 .36 A110.383 FRITO LAY INC. 420666 86-2311-6250-COMM 94.94 • 94.94 • • A11O384 FRONT RANGE SECURITY 0489PS 21-6490-6380-8A 300.00 • • 300.00 O A110385 FT, LUPTON PRESS 001558 21-6510-6337-9 127.80 • 127.80 A110386 GALLEGOS MARIE MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 76.56 • • I I II I i I i II I 4D 41 II WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 AS OF : 05/05/89 411 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • A110386 GALLEGOS MARIE 76.56 4Is • A11O387 GFOA 261673 01-1152-6210 40.00 • 40.00 4I 4I A110388 GORDON'S LIQUOR MART 000600 01-1123-6599 10. 15 • 000605 01-1123-6599 25.00 • 35. 15 A110389 GRASHORN PAT 361607 01-2110-6370-TRNG 5.01 5.01 • • A110390 GREELEY GAS CO 1131 01-1061-6340-ROAD 51 . 18 • 1946 01-1061-6344-CA 19. 15 • 33747 01-106►-6340-ROAD 159.72 • 46914 01-10b1-6341-CA 199. 43 4846 01-1061-6340-ROAD 150. 67 • 570 01-1061-6340-ROAD 40. 99 e 5822 01-.10616344-.-CA15.00 59009 01-1061-6340-ROAD 161 .99 • 7080 01-1061-6340-ROAD 47.87 • 7354 01-1061-6344-CA 36. 12 7787 01-1061-6344-NRD 335. 23 • 8085 01-1061-6340-ROAD 130.00 . 92 01-1061-6341-MPSC 35.54 $6005 01-1061-6344-CA 174. 15 1 .557.04 • • A110391 GREELEY HOUSING AUTHORITY AUMNFE 24-9043-6495-4590 159.04 • HTH656 24-9043-6495-4190 45.00 • UA0797 24-9044-6397-4715 50.00 • 1102V5 24-9044-6397-4715 329.00 114505 24-9044-6397-4715 375.00 • 656V05 24-9044-6397-4715 668.00 • 751V05 24-9044-6397-4715 482.00 797V05 24-9044-6397-4715 700 .00 • i • 41 • Ii I I I I. I i ! i • ill • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 41 NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110391 GREELEY HOUSING AUTHORITY 2 ,808.04 • • A110392 GRIFFITH; DOUG PT5189 01-2180-6350 400 .00 • 400.00 0 41 A110393 GUEVREMONT DON 361608 01-2110-6370-TRNG 7. 31 e 7.31 ill • A110394 HANSELMANN THOMAS 03139 01-1123-6370 182 .40 • • 182. 40 • • A110395 HANSEN, DIXIE MI0489 21-6600-6375-9 48. 16 . REGFEE 21-6600-6373-9 44.00 494977 21-6600-6377-9 28.78 • 120.94 • • A110396 HERNANDEZ, PAULO MI0469 21-6600-6375-9 30.20 • • 30.20 • • A110397 HERRING, EDWIN J 612463 01-2910-6370 106.05 • 106.05 • • A110398 HINES, JANET S. 050589 79-2310-6143 191 .00 • 41 191 .00 • A110399 IOM 9GH309 65- 1191-6360 40. 79- • 930411 65-1191-6360 106.92 0 60. 13 • • • 0 4W • • • • • WAP2OOP MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 PAGE : 9 • • WARRANT REGISTER AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOLCE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110400 INLOES GENE M10489 01-3400-6370 272.40 • 272.40 • • A110401 J G S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 73945 11-3141-6229 185.59 • • 185. 59 OD • A110402 JAMES PUBLISHING INC 359144 01-1012-6229 35.98 • 35.98 • • A110403 JANTZ STANLEY 0428MI 01-1041-6370 194.60 • 194.60 • • A110404 JEWELL EVA M. MI0469 21-6840-6372-9 112.00 • 112.00 • • • A110405 JOHNSENb JOHN PT5189 01-2180-6350 - 400.00 • 400.00 • • A► 10406 JOHNSTOWN BREEZE JB89 01-1110-6229 14.00 • 14.00 • • A110407 JORDAN, EDWARD L. 4338 01-2110-6370-ADM 6.00 • • _ . 6.00 _ • • A110408 K-MART 000599 01-1123-6599 56.44 • 000602 01-1123-6599 30.36 000607 01-1123-6599 60. 76 • 147.56 • • • • • • 0 • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 41 NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110409 KALLASj JESSIE 1025W5 24-9034-6397-4715 669.00 41 669.00 • • At10410 KEEFE COFFE AND SUPPLY 105314 86-2311-6250-COMM 198.8♦ • I05660 86-2311-6250-COMM 381 .27 • 580. 11 • • 41 A110411 KENNEDY/ GEORGE MI0489 01-1011-6375^03 279.00 • 279.00 • le A110412 KFKA RADIO STATION ST0489 21-6510-6337-9 200.00 . 200.00 • • A110413 KINSON/ PATRICIA 04309 01-1123-6350 13.00 • 14. 00 • • 4110414 KNOX& CECIL 2010V5 24-9044-6397-4715 46.00 • • 46.00 • • A110415 KOBEL' CAROL 05039 01-1123-6370 35.00 . 35.00 • • A110416 LAROUCHE. SHELLY M10489 21-6510-6312-9 25.66 41 25.66 • • • A110417 LAWLEY3 DAVID LUTHER 050589 79-4410-6143 178.20 79-4410-6147 468.00 41 646.20 • • • • • • • I 41 ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 11 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A11O418 LECHMAN, COLLEEN MI0489 21-6600-6375-9 4.83 • 4.83 • • A110419 LLAMAS' LORETTA FD0489 21-6490-6377-8 5.00 • MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 26.00 • 31 .00 • • A110420 LOPEZ' OLGA MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 102.04 • • 102.04 . • 4110421 LUVELAND DAILY REPORTER- LRH89 01-1110-6229 78.00 • 78.00 • • A110422 LUNA' LINDA M10489 21-6950-6372 24.56 • 24. 56 • • A110423 MALCOM DAVID 4341 01-2111-6220-SOPT 6.00 • • 6.00 • • 4110424 MANAGED LOGISTICS SYSTEMS 680150 61-9020-6397 - 151379.98 • 15■379.98 • • 4110425 MARGHEIM. RICK MI5489 60-2160-6940 239.55 • 239.55 • • A110426 MARKLEY' BILL 1752V4 24-9044-6397-4715 118.00 • 1752V5 24-9044-6397-4715 253.00 • 371 .00 • • • • • • • I ■ ID IP • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 12 0 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • --- • A110427 MARTINEZ YSIDORA F00489 21 -6600-6222-9 6. 40 • MI0489 216600-6315-9 -- 9. 60- • £6.00 • A110428 MATT, GREGORY 04079 01-1123-6350 24. 50 0 24 .50 • A110429 MC CABS. GARY 050589 79-2160-6143 383.00 41 • 383.00 A110430 METRO WEST PUBLISHING INC MWP5l8 01-1014-6331 48.60 • S 48.60 • • A110431 METRO WEST PUBLISHING INC 1227 01-1152-6330 337 .92 1245 01-1152-6330 36.48 1246 01-1152-6330 53. 12 • 1259 01-1152-6330 43.84 0 471 .36 • • A110432 MILLERS MIKE 050589 79-2110-6143 12.00 0 79-2110-6147 245.00 • 257.00 i • A110433 MOLOCZNIK3 TONY 04119 011123-6370 4. 56 • • 4. 56 • A110434 MONDRAGON3 MARY ANN M10489 21-6510-6372-9 185.24 • 185.24 0 A110445 MOORE JtANtNE MI0469 21-6820-6372-9 132.40 0 • IP • ID II . WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 13 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110435 MOORE JEANENE 132.40 • • A110436 MORGAN CNTY Rum- ELEC ASN 3200 01-1061-6340-ROAD 26.51 • 3630 01-1061-6340-ROAO 29.89 62790 11-3140-6340 38.68 • 95.08 • • A110437 MORRISON LEE 0 050589 79-1012-6143 87. 50 • . 87.50 . 4 AI10438 NARANJO. ELIZABETH MI0489 21-66006J7S-9 45.32 . 421333 21-6600-6220-9 10. 15 • _ 55.47 • • A110439 NEVAREZ, CONRADA CC0414 21-6600-6398-9 22.61 • 22.61 41 O A110440 NICHOLS BUS. MACH. REPAIR 1403 01-9020-6360-ACCT 16.00 41 16.00 4, • A110441 NICKERSON. TED 4454 01-1061-6370 45.80 • • 45.80 • • A110442 NORTH W C WATER DISTRICT 41589 01-1061-6340-ROAD 17.55 • 42189 OI-1061-6340-ROAD 17.55 • 35. 10 • • A110443 NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE 040198 01-9020-6350 230.00 41043069 01-1031-6350 80.20 05019A 01-9020-6350 40.00 41 • 41 41 II • . 40 . WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 14 ID AS OF ; 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • A110443 NORTHERN ARMORED SERVICE 05019C 01-9020-6450 72.00 • 422.20 • • A1I0444 NURSE PLACEMENT SERVICE ST0428 21-6840-6358-9 166.00 • • 166.00 • • A110445 PARK SPANGLER AND 28331 01-1123-6350 108.45 • 108.45 Il • At10446 PARKER. GARY N10430 01-1031-6370 238.20 • 050589 79-1031-6143 91 .38 . 329.58 ID • A110447 PENNY SAVER MEDICAL SPLY 677360 19-4140-6220-WAP 161 . 20 • 19-4140-6221-CDP 16.76 • 177.96 ♦ • A110448 PETTY CASH BLDG G GRNOS 10486 01-1061-6360-CC 2.90 • 10500 01-1061-6233-CC 2. 13 • 14885 O1-1061-6235-CC 6.98 23620 01-1061-6360-CC 3.70 • 48 OL-1061-6360-CC 4. 15 Ill 01-1061-6233-00 2.02 • 21 .88 . . A110449 PIPER LINDA MI0469 21-6800-6372-9 28.10 • 28.10 • • A110450 PITNEY BOWES INC 256319 64-►155-6360 141.75 • 141 . 75 • ID • ID • • • tiii.. i i I I I a ,,.• • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/69 • MARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 15 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A110451 PONCELOW1 KENNETH 120KP 01-2110-6372-TANG 24.00 • 24. 00 • • A110452 PRICE LYNN MI0426 65-1191-6370 26.00 • • 26.00 • • A110453 PRICE. VIRGINIA MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 ---- 12.88 • 12.88 • • ' A110454 PROULXI RON 1993CL 24-9034-6397-4715 296.07 296.07 • • A110455 PUBLIC SERV COMPANY OF CO 890103 61-9020-6340 7.08 • 890203 61-9020-6340 118.64 • 890503 61-9020-6340 20.48 890603 61-9020-6340 32.37 • 890703 61-9020-6340 373.58 • 890803 61-9020-6340 --------267 35- • 819.50 • • A110456 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO PK430 01-1061-6341-S0CU 22.73 • 17427 01-1061-6341-CA 2.65 • 4456 01-1.061-6340-ROAD 82.81 4692 O1-1061-6341-CA 502.35 • 47595 01-1061-6341-COMT 97.09 4152416 O1-1061-6341-CA 36. 10 5895 01-1061-6340-ROAD 5.48 • 749.21 • • A110457 R 4 A UNIFORM CENTER 010292 21-6490-6220-8 29.95 • 010295 21-6490-6220-8 29.95 • 010298 21-6490-6220-8 29.95 • 010299 21-6440-6220-H 29.95 • 119.80 • • • • 41 ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 16 • AS OF : 05/05/89 ® WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 4110458 RADIO COMMUNICATIONS CORP TR0503 01-2150-6530 317.20 • 317 .20 • • A110459 RICHARDSON PATRICK A 388682 01-2110-6315-JAIL 11 . 72 • ' • 11.72 • • A110460 RICHTER, MARION MI489 01-1110-6370 13. 20 • 13.20 • • A110461 ROCCAFORTE JOHN 050389 79-1191-6143 45.00 • _ 45.00 • • A110462 ROGERS. TERI 050589 79-1191-6143 40. 58 • • 40.58 • • A► L046J ROMANSIK1 GLORIA 04289 01-1125-6370 9.00 • 9.00 • • A110464 ROOT. MARSHA MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 28.00 • 28.00 • • A110465 ROTHE ALVIE W M10489 01-3400-6470 122. 15 • • 122. 15 • • 4110466 ROTHMAN ELMER M[0489 01-3400-6370 257.18 • 257. 18 • 0 A110467 SAFEWAY STORES INC 000604 01-1123-6599 17 .96 • • • • ID i Ai I I I i I I I I I i i ...� R WINMAMWMINSINA A IP . NAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 17 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 411 NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • I 4, A110467 SAFEWAY STORES INC 17.96 • A110468 SAGE, CHARLES t 050389 79-2310-6143 200.00 41 200,00 A110469 SAMPSON, MICHAEL 0428MI 01-1041-6370 57. 60 • 57.60 41 • A110470 SCHAEFER REHAB CNTR 9679 01-9020-6310 110.65 41 9798 01-9020-6310 130.72 9807 01-9020-6310 - 129.44 • 370.81 411 41 A110471 SCHUETI, KEITH A 050589 19-1014-6147 450.00 • 450.00 • A110472 SCHWARTZ, MARY 438957 01-2110-6315-INCS 13. 18 • 44189 01-2110-6315-CIUL 4.41 • 17.59 41 • A110473 SCHNEERS, AMY MG0427 19-4140-6370-GEN 3.60 • 0422 19-4140-6370-NAP 1 .60 41 0423 19-4140-6370-FP 3.80 0424 19-4140-b370-CHP .60 • 0425 19-4140-6370-BNC 2.00 • 0426 19-4140-6370-HCP 1 .60 i 13. 20 4D 41 Al ►0474 SELLERS, DORIS M10489 21-6390-6372-8 12.80 • 72.80 • 41 41 41 ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : i8 0 AS OF : 05/05/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 41 w NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08.1 PROJ AMOUNT 41 • , A110475 SENTRY FIRE G SAFETY INC 20381 61-9020-6360 55.75 • 20452 61-9020^6360 18.75 20532 61-9020-6360 18.75 41 20541 61-9020-6360 30.50 123.75 x • A110476 SERVICE AMERICA CORP 04289 01-1126-6370 10.00 • • 10.00 41 • A110477 SHAROFF FOOD SERVICES 927134 21-6600-6310-9 6.93 • 6.93 41 • A110478 SHEEP DRAW VET. HOSPITAL 4218 01-2111-6350-K9 23.00 41 23.00 ' 41 A110479 SIEH. MICHAEL 04259 01-1123-6350 32.00 • 32.00 • A110480 SIMMERING. GERALD 130529 01-2310-6220-1SOP 13.44 • 305291 01-2110-6372-TRNG 5.00 • 18.44 41 • A110481 SPECKMAN WALTER J 050389 79-6950-6143 - 123.00 • 123.00 • • A110482 SPECTRA-TECH. INC CREDIT 01-2118-6220 70.03- • 040438 01-2118-6220 22.51 040463 01-2118-6220 62.51 • 14.99 A • • • • 41 41 - ID ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 IP WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 19 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID ID A110483 STEWART. FRANK C. MI489 01-1110-6370 13.60 • ID 1:1.60 • A110484 STODDARD FUNERAL HOME RT5189 01-2180-6531 300.00 • • 300.00 Ill • A110485 STODDARD PAUL M CC5J89 01-2180-6350 - 910.00 • 910.00 ID 4I A110486 STORAGE TECHNOLOGY 050688 65-1191-6360 1 .159.00 • 1 .159.00 S S A110487 SUBURBAN PROPANE 42089 01-5220-6340 82.40 • • 82.40 • • 0.110488 SUNRISE COMM HLTH CNTR 0389AA 21-6490-6380-8A 338.80 • 04890.A 21-6490-6380-8A 308. 00 • 646.80 ID • A110489 TATTERED COVER BOOK STORE 18898 01-1126-6330 26.43 • 26.43 I A110490 THOMAS SCIENTIFIC 891021 19-4170-6250-GNRL 17 .26 17 .26 41 • A110491 THOMPSON. SHARLEE MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 21 .30 • 21 .30 • • • ID 4I IP IP 4I ID IP WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 20 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110492 TIMM1 HENRY H. MI0489 21-6510-6372-9 33.84 • 33.84 • • A110493 TOWN OF J0HNSTOWN 414309 01-1061-6340-ROAD 26.00 • 26.00 • sa • • A110494 TOWN Of NUNN 5189 01-1061-6340-ROAD 13.00 • 13.00 • • A11O495 TRI-AREA RUB8ISH 1$5F4 01-1061-6J47-HSFI 25.34 • L[0F♦ 01-1061-6347-LIEF 12. 66 • 38.00 • ili A110496 U S POSTMASTER 050589 01-9020-6599 9,000.00 • 9.000.OD • • A110497 U.S. MARSHALL SERVICE JL0489 01-2110-6315-WARR 375.00 • • 375.00 • A110498 UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSN 7692 01-1061-6340-ROAD - 31 .02 • 31 .02 • • A110499 UNITED STATES MELDING INC 739452 21-6380-6381-8 138.43 • 138.43 • • A110500 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 90'3412 67-1192-6345^LD 7.29 • 67-1192-6345-LOCL 35.52 ID 903509 67-1192-6345-LOCL 35.52 903551 67-1192-6345-LOGE 36.3♦ • 9D3554 67-1192-6345-LOCL 960. 19 • • • • ID 41 • • Ill ill - • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 21 41 AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • 41 All0500 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 903700 67-1192-6345-L0 4 .57 • 67-1192-6345-LOCL - 94.03 • 903726 67-1192-6345-LOCL 37.58 903800 6T-1192-6345-L0 40.82 • 67-1192-6345-LOLL 517.09 • 903815 67-1192-6345-LO 6. 74 67-1192-6345-LOCL 182.29 • 903816 67-1192-6345-LOCL 183.57 41903853 67-11926345-LOCt 38. 16 903907 67-1192-6345-LOCL 37. 58 • 907626 67-1192-6345-LO --------- _ • _ 21339.40 41 • A11.0501 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 900085 67-1192-6345-LO 15.00 • 15.00 • A110502 VWR SCIENTIFIC 519062 19-4140-6250-LAB 611.81 • 519408 19-4170-6250-GNRL 83.30 • 148. 11 • • A110503 M M GRAINGER INC 253924 01-1061-6233-CC 148. 19 • 253935 01-1061-6233-CC 60.51 • 208. 70 • • A110504 WAL-MART DISCOUNT CITIES 000606 01-1123-6599 122.24 • 000608 01-1123-6599 20.00 • 142.24 41 • A11050S WALKER, JENNIFER 05019 01-1126-6370 76.41 O • 76.41 • • A110506 WALTON. KATHY J. MI0489 21-6600-6375-9 48.88 • 649878 21-6600-6377-9 6.93 • _ 55.81 • 41 • • d II I I I ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 3 22 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • I A110507 WASATCH PHOTOGRAPHIC ♦230 01-1014-6220 87.30 4231 19-4170-6250-GNRL 87.35 • 4309 01-1154-6210 411 .75 41 • 586.40 • • A110508 WE1BLE1 LINDA L. 050589 79-1191-6147 160.00 • 160.00 • • A110509 MELD COUNTY REVOLVING 04109 01-1123-6210 285.92 • 05019 01-1126-6370 92.00 412811 6[-9020-6360 2.20 2850 61-9020-6360 23.10 • 2930 61-9020-6360 2.20 2952 01-.10146370160.40 41 2954 01-2910-6370 65.00 2958 01-1041-6310 15.00 • 2959 01-2[ IO-6599-C[VL 15.00 41 • 660.82 • • A110510 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC SUPPLY 099355 01-1061-6236-CC 10.32 • 10.32 • • A110511 WILLIAMS' DORIS W MI489 01-1110-6370 80.20 41 80.20 • • A110512 WILLOUGHBY. TIMOTHY 050389 79-1061-6143 50.00 • 79-1061-6147 10.00 • 60.00 • • AIIOSIJ WINDSOR CONOCO 000501 01-1123-6599 8.44 0 • 8.44 . • • • • • • I IIIi I I i I I I i II ■ ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 23 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • HUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A110514 WORKMAN, ROBERT 042889 79-2110-6143 34.50 ' 359359 01-2111-6220-SOPT 25.00 . • 59.50 • • A110515 WORLOWIDE TOUR 6 TRAVEL REGFEE 21-6510-6373-9 100.00 • 100.00 • 2= • A110516 MORLEY1 MAYDEAN 050469 79-4411-6143 329.54 • . 329.5♦ S= • • AL10S17 WYCO L.P. GAS; INC 20607 01-1061-6340-ROAD 74 .48 ID 74.48 • • 4110518 XEROGRAPHIC COMPUTER- 531040 65-1191-6220 162.00 • 162.00 • • 4110519 XEROX CORPORATION 054348 01-9020-6360-ENG 15.00 • 409120 04-9020-6360-FLMV 100.00 527246 01-9020-6360-C6R 170.00 • 527247 Ot-9020-b360-ASES 170.00 • 585922 01-9020-6360-ENG 195.36 • 983237 01-9020-6360-PURC 152.15 . 983238 01-9020-6360-FIN 152.15 983249 01-9020-6360-C4R 152.15 • 1 ,106.81 • • A110520 YANT, KIMBERLY MG0331 19-4110-6370 12.00 • • • 12.00 • A110521 YARNELL, RAMONA 050289 79-4410-6143 100.00 • 100.00 • • • • • • ID • • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE i 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 24 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • 4110522 YOUNG' SUE 050589 79-1031-6143 115.00 • £ 15 .00 • li. • A110523 ZELLER OIL COMPANY 03043 61-9020-6246 523.08 • 0323 11-3140-6371 588.00 • __--_-1 $111 .08 • • ------------__ • FINAL TOTAL : 73.366.52 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l t ID41 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/05/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 25 • AS OF : 05/05/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE SEEN • COMPLETED OH THE ROGUE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 24 , AND • • DATED 05/05/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT I 73,366.62 • • DATED THIS 8 D,AY OF PRY I9 89 _. • • -� • DIRECT in Fl ANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AHD SWORN TO BEFORE Mt THIS 8 DAY OF MAY - 19- 89-_. • IDMY COMMISSION EXPIR'E/S:_L'IYS&mm-silxc:rplu+V&_ . • • • NOTARY PUHLIC • 4, WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HERESY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • GENERAL THE -FUND TOTALING t 73,366. 52 ® -_ • DATED THIS _B____ DAY OF ____ MAY I9-fig,_. • T2tvJfG(t`�, • • COUNTY ERK ANU RECD ER BY • • -- - AIV.s-e_d'_-- ---- DEPUTY CHAIRMAN ID i7 ici III _. 4....-.1 - 7""-- - iii3,t,geltt-e\stilir 4, tMSER MEMBER Sete+- • ill MEMBER MEMBER • • • • • ID • e WWP952PO WELD COUNTY DATE 05/05/89 • COIN !WARRANT REGISTER SUMMARY REPORT PAGE a I • PAYROLL DATE 05/05/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES NAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 12 , AND • • DATED 05/05/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR MARES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 3___249„DZC,,aa_______. • DATED TH __ D Y OF _Sly 19 _&,9„_. • • ____ ;14---- • DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ---49--- DAY OF A4, 19-61.--0 • • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES.__DtCofnrntssi:n Expitzs June 8, 1 41 •/ 1z-!sC�yl hs • • NOVA UBLIC • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELO COUNTY , COLORADO, HEREBY • (APPROVE ) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Social Services FUND - TOTALING $ 28,026.00 • • DATED THIS ___y4__ DAY OF ____L fax 19__82_. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER 81 • • _ $Ls21__ --- -c_440 • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN 41 MEMBER 61:1"4651:6:1\411:14Nr: MEMBER ::i • • • MEMBER MEMBER • • • • • • • 1 I , I Ii . . . i u A/a04 . aAna J181S7 r�r mEmoRAnDUm 0011 '1: 1, WIWDCClerk to the Board May 1, 1989 To Dee George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge COLORADO From Road Opening subjet The following road was opened May 1, 1989. It was closed April 25, 1989 for a bridge replacement. WCR 57 between WCR 46 & WCR 48 GG/mw:Ire xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 46 WCR 48 WCR 57 mEmoRAt1DUm Clerk to the Board May 2, 1989 To late COLORADO From George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge Road Opening Subject The following road was opened May 2, 1989. It was closed April 6, 1989 for a bridge replacement. WCR 3 between WCR 12 & State Hwy 52 GG/mw:frc 'cc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 3 WCR 12 WELD co .,17,E CDi✓' 'SSfD .:nr. 12851 PAY --7 r, 9= 34 City of Broomfield THE�� TO 7&E11�, I NUMBER SIX GARDEN OFFICE CENTER • BROOMFIELD,COLORADO 80020 • ,,Ffi�nnr--".ANA (303) 469-3301 April 28, 1989 REGISTERED MAIL Weld County Board of Commissioners 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Notice of Annexation The Weld County Line, Ltd. Property Enclosed please find the following items for the above property: 1. Copy of Notice of Hearing 2. Copy of Resolution 3. Copy of Petition, as filed 4. Copy of Annexation Impact Report Occk): at Vicki M rc City Clerk /de Enclosures pc: Kirk Oglesby, Planning Director Process File NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING (Annexation and Zoning) Notice is hereby given that the following public hearing will be held before the Broomfield City Council at the time, date, and place described below. All persons in any manner interested in the following described hearing are requested to attend such hearing and aid the City Council in its consideration of the matter. Following reports by staff and the applicant, an opportunity will be afforded those persons desiring to speak on this proposal. City Council DATE May 23, 1989 TIME 7:30 p.m. PLACE Council Chambers, No. 6 Garden Office Center The public hearing is scheduled to begin at 7:30 p.m. Depending upon the Council's agenda, the public hearing may begin after the scheduled time. It is suggested that interested parties be in attendance at 7:30 p.m. Property Location Southwest corner of W. 168th Avenue and 1-25 • No. of Acres 87.6 ± Applicant Weld County Line, Ltd. ACTIONS 1. Determining and finding whether the area proposed to be annexed meets the applicable requirements of sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105 C.R.S. and is considered eligible for annexation. 2. Zoning the area to PUD (Planned Unit Development) A copy of the resolution initiating annexation proceedings and legal description of property is attached. Questions concerning this proposal may be answered by contacting the Planning Department at 469-3301. Please publish in the Broomfield Enterprise on 4/20, 4/27, 5/4 and 5/11. Date billed : Invoice No: Amount: Charge -- City Delivered to newspaper by PNA&Z.DOC ■ RESOLUTION NO. 50-89 A RESOLUTION FINDING A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF A 87.6± ACRE PARCEL LOCATED IN SECTION 3, T1S, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M. , COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO, AND SECTIONS 34 AND 35, T1N, R68W OF THE 6TH P.M. , COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 31-12-107(1) C.R.S. , AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the owner of a 87.6± acre parcel located at the southwest corner of W. 168th Avenue and 1-25 has petitioned the city council for annexation of said parcel, said parcel being described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOMFIELD, COLORADO: Section 1. Finslines. The city council hereby finds that: A. The landowner of one hundred percent of the area, excluding public streets and alleys, meeting the requirements of sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105 has petitioned the city council for the annexation of the area. B. The petition was filed with the city clerk on April 11, 1989. C. The petition contains the following: (1) An allegation that it is desirable and necessary that such areas be annexed to the City of Broomfield, Colorado. (2) An allegation that the requirements of sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. , as amended, exist or have been met. (3) An allegation that the signer of the petition comprise the landowner of one hundred percent (100%) of the territory included in the area proposed to be annexed, exclusive of streets and alleys. (4) A request that the City approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. (5) The signature of the landowner. (6) The mailing address of each signer. (7) The legal description of land owned by each signer. (8) The date of signing of each signature. (9) The affidavit of the circulator of such petition, whether consisting of one or more sheets, that each signature thereon is the signature of the a person whose name it purports to be. D. Accompanying the petition are four copies of an annexa- tion map containing the following information: • Resolution No. 50-89 Page No. 2 (1) A written legal description of the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed. (2) A map showing the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed. (3) Within the annexation boundary map, a showing of the location of each ownership tract in unplatted land and, if part or all of the area is platted, the boundaries and the plat numbers of plots or of lots and blocks; (4) Next to the boundary of the area proposed to be annexed„ a drawing of the contiguous boundary of the City and the contiguous boundary of any other municipality abutting the area proposed to be annexed. E. No signature on the petition is dated more than one hundred and eighty days prior to the date of filing the petition for annexation with the clerk. F. The clerk has referred the petition to the governing body as a communication. G. Said petition is in substantial compliance with section 31-12-107 (1) , C.R.S. , as amended. Section 2. Hear,inq. As required by section 31-12-108, C.R.S. , the city council will hold a hearing to determine if the proposed annexation complies with sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, or such parts thereof' as may be required to establish eligibility under the terms of the municipal Annexation Act of 1965. Such hearing shall be combined and held concurrently with the public hearing on the ordinance annexing the area proposed for annexa- tion. The hearing shall be held on May 23, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , in the council chambers. ADOPTED this O day of _ ,0 , 389. • si hurtz, Mayor ATTEST: uLck•L Vicki Marc, i y Clerk APPROVED 'S Matthew Gla"s2 'C1ty Attorney 041289 EXHIBIT A Resolution No. 50-89 PAGE 1 OF 2 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, AND SECTIONS 34, 35, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE. CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3: THENCE EASTERLY AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 A DISTANCE OF 863.10 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 1-25, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNJNG; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1. N22042'00"E A DISTANCE OF 558.11 FEET; 2. N14°10'OO"E A DISTANCE OF 202.20 FEET; 3. N22°42'00"E A DISTANCE OF 281.35 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 709007, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 764934, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF STATE HIGHWAY 7; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARCEL LINE EXTENDED A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARCEL LINE EXTENDED A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 7, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF • A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 2126127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE, AS OF February 27, 1989, TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 AND THE NORTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 744127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF SAID INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEP- TION NO. 744127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, PAGE 2 OF 2 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 468197, WELD COUNTY RECORDS, SAID EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL ALSO BEING THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989,OF SAID INTER- STATE HIGHWAY 1-25; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF - WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF STATE HIGHWAY 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NUMBER 468197, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXTENDED, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF WEST 160TH AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXTENDED, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF WEST 160TH AVENUE FOR A DISTANCE OF 805.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27/ 1989, OF INTERSTATE .HIGHWAY 25; THENCE NORTH- EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 583468, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 583468, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING LOCATED ON THE NORTH- SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 3 AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTH CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 619408, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AND SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 87.6 ACRES (MORE OR LESS) TOTAL PERIMETER IS 4850.47 FEET ONE-SIXTH TOTAL PERIMETER IS 808.41 FEET TOTAL CONTIGUOUS PERIMETER IS 2151.73 FEET ATTACHMENT 2 Revision: 2/24/88 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY IN THE COUNTIES OF ADAMS AND WEILL STATE OF COLORADO TO THE CITY OF BROOMFIELD. COLORADO TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BROOMFIELD, COLORADO: The undersigned, in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, Part 1, Article 12, Title 31, Colorado Revised - Statutes, as amended, hereby petitions the City Council of the City of Broomfield, Colorado, for the annexation of the following described unincorporated territory located in the Counties of Adams and Weld, State of Colorado, to-wit: - For legal description see Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In support of said Petition, your Petitioner alleges: 1. It is desirable and necessary that the above-described unincorporated territory be annexed to the City of _ Broomfield, Colorado. 2. The requirements of Section 31-12-104, C.R.S. , as amended, exist or have been met, to-wit: a. Not less than one-sixth of the perimeter of the area proposed to be annexed is contiguous with the City of Broomfield: b. A community of interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the City of Broomfield; c. Said area is urban or will be urbanized in the near future: and d. Said area is integrated with or is capable of being integrated with the City of Broomfield. 3. The requirements of Section 31-12-105, C.R.S. , as amended, exist or have been met, to-wit: a. In establishing the boundaries of the territory to be annexed, no land held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels RECEIVED of real estate, has been divided into separate CITY CLERK'Sparts or parcels without the written consent of - ICE the landowners; and b. In establishing the boundaries of the area pro- posed to be annexed, no land held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of real estate or two or more contiguous - tracts or parcels of real estate comprising 20 - 4/6/89 Page No. 2 acres or more (which, together with the buildings and improvements situated thereon has a valuation for assessment in excess of two hundred thousand dollars for ad valorem tax purposes for the year next preceding the annexation) has been included without the written consent of the landowners; and c. That no annexation proceedings have been commenced for the annexation of part or all of the subject property to another municipality. d. The proposed annexation would not have the effect of extending a municipal boundary more than three miles in any direction from any point of such municipal boundary in any one year. e. If a portion of a platted street or alley is to be annexed, the entire width of said street or alley is included within the area proposed to be an- nexed. 4. The Weld County Line, Ltd. is the owner of the property - described in Exhibit B attached hereto, excluding public streets, highway rights-of-ways, and alleys. 5. The mailing address of the Petitioner is as follows: The Weld County Line, Ltd. c/o Kent L. Rickenbaugh - 777 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 6. That the undersigned is the owner of one hundred percent of the territory included in the area proposed to be annexed, excluding public streets, highway rights-of-ways, and alleys. - 7. The legal description of the property proposed to be - annexed is attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Your petitioner further requests that the City of Broomfield, Colorado, approve the annexation of the area proposed to be annexed. THE WELD • 1 LI. , LTD. - a Colora • L ' it •fPa ership �1 By Ke•' - •a gh General Partner Date d/-/e 7, 4/6/89 - Page No. 3 STATE OF COLORADO ) /;t a M" ) ss. COUNTY OF Xilie dA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 424.6 day of G4.00A-c.C , 1989, by Kent L. Rickenbaugh, as General - Partner o!The weld County Line, Ltd. , a Colorado Limited Part- nership. - My commission expires .3 - 1 - C i,9,4 PpBo 9 A•S �`S,,� Notary Public r G' .; t PATh\CiA WITNESS m n#?aiCbifei.Oial seal. S r+�`.' OF TE CCU 4/6/89 AFFIDAVIT OF CIRCULATOR STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF t.t1/r/ ) The undersigned,t t Pt 414402- , being duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and states: 1. That the Affiant circulated the Petition for Annexation to the City of Broomfield, Colorado, for the purpose of obtaining the signatures of the above-named Petitioners. 2. That each signature thereon is the signature of the person or party whose name it purports to be. •ate /D19 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4....a, day of C7.p.ye f , 1989. My commission expires , -, - 0/ . 1 lkz/'ue±,<; 1/22nnf/ni Y+!vf i PATRICIAG Notary Public ' 9 Tf Mh nd official seal. E` elf OF CO`�C� 4/6/89 r 041289 PAGE 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT A TO THE PETITION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, AND SECTIONS 34, 35, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE EASTERLY AND ALONG THE SOUTH' LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 A DISTANCE OF 863.10 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 1-25, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THR TRpE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1. N22°42'00"E A DISTANCE OF 558.11 FEET; 2. N14°10'00"E A DISTANCE OF 202.20 FEET; 3. N22°42'00"E A DISTANCE OF 281.35 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 709007, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 764934, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF STATE HIGHWAY 7; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARCEL LINE EXTENDED A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARCEL LINE EXTENDED A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 7, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 2126127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE, AS OF February 27, 1989, TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 35 AND THE NORTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 744127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF SAID INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEP- TION NO. 744127, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, PAGE 2 OF 2 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 468197, WELD COUNTY RECORDS, SAID EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL ALSO BEING THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989,OF SAID INTER- STATE HIGHWAY I-25; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF - WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF STATE HIGHWAY 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NUMBER 468197, WELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY I-25; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXTENDED, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF WEST 160TH AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE EXTENDED, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF WEST 160TH AVENUE FOR A DISTANCE OF 805.00 FEET (MORE OR LESS) TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 25: THENCE NORTH- EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 583468, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 583468, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING LOCATED ON THE NORTH- SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 3 AND ALSO BEING THE SOUTH CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 619408, ADAMS COUNTY RECORDS: THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND AND SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE PAINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 87.6 ACRES (MORE OR LESS) TOTAL PERIMETER IS 4850.47 FEET ONE-SIXTH TOTAL PERIMETER IS 808.41 FEET TOTAL CONTIGUOUS PERIMETER IS 2151.73 FEET s EXHIBIT B TO THE ANNEXATION PETITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY A parcel of land situated in the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Adams, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center Quarter Corner of said Section 3; thence South 89°27'47" East along the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 3 a distance of 863.10 feet; to the westerly right-of-way of State Highway 1-25; thence along said Westerly right-of-way the following six (6) courses: 1 . North 22°42'00" East a distance of 558.11 feet; 2. North 14°10'00" East a distance of 202.20 feet; 3. North 22°42'00" East a distance' of 281.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 4 . North 22°42 ' 00" East a distance of 618.65 feet; 5 . North 14°33'30" East a distance of 192.20 feet; 6. North 32°09'00" West a distance of 682.78 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of State Highway No. 7, said point also being 100.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; Thence along said Southerly right-of-way the following three (3) courses: 1 . South 89°48'00" West, parallel to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section, a distance of 563.41 feet; 2 . North 56°21' 30" West a distance of 44.89 feet to a point being 75.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; 3. South 89°48'00" West, parallel to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section a distance of 362 .35 feet; Thence South 00°00'00" East a distance of 1346.73 feet; thence South 89°27' 47" East a distance of 1039. 46 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 36.00 acres (more or less) . 4 88-45 ANNERATIO$ IMPACT REPORT 4/28/89 Completion Schedule: 2S days prior to Council hearing Distribution: Adams & weld County Commissioners, Process File PROJECT: The Weld County Line, Ltd. Property LOCATION: S.H. 7 at I-25 A. Attachments I. Map showing the present and proposed boundaries of the municipality in the vicinity of the proposed annexa- tion II. Map showing present streets, major trunk water lines, sewer interceptors and outfalls, other utility lines and ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets and utility lines in the vicinity of the proposed annexation. III. Map showing the existing and proposed land use pattern in the area to be annexed. Proposed land use pattern is in accordance with Annexa- tion Plan adopted by City Council. Final land uses will be based upon approved PUD zoning and PUD Plan. IV. Copy of pre-annexation agreement, attached. B. Statements I. Plans of the municipality for extending to or otherwise providing for, within the area to be annexed, municipal service performed by or on behalf of the municipality at the time of annexation: The City of Broomfield intends to extend public safety, governmental administration and other municipal services to the property immediately upon annexation. The City intends to provide water and sewer service to the property. II. The method under which the municipality plans to finance the extension of the municipal services into the area to be annexed: The extension of public safety, governmental administration and other municipal services to the property will be financed by general fund revenue sources. The extension of water and sewer servic- es to the property will be financed by the City utility funds. Annexation Impact Report 4/28/89 Page No. 2 III. Existing districts within the area to be annexed are as follows: St. Vrain Valley School District Dacono Fire District Adams County School District No. 12 West Adams County Fire Protection District Urban Drainage & Flood Control District Regional Transportation District IV. The effect of annexation upon local public school district systems including the estimated number of students generated and the capital construction re- quired to educate such students: The property is designated for employment and open space by the Annexation Plan. An application for approval of a PUD Plan, which specifies land uses, has not yet been received. It is not anticipated that the annexation will generate students or require capital consotruction. r 229 28 27 APRIL 28, 1989 25 • uo COUNTY RD. 4 __ _\ 175TH AVE. as h J �OHNSO N. w EXISTING LAND USE AGRICULTURAL c a PROPOSED LAND USE EMPLOYMENT, .N, CC w 35 z 36 AND OPEN SPACELA. Z i aJ oz 0 U , TIN W. 168TH IAVE.(S.H. 7) i I ,s II 3 E PROPOSED ANNEXATION EXISTING A-3 �' C) PROPOSED PUD 5 41 z •—•-3io 21 , ISTING Iiz BROOMFIELD CIT LIMITS---,61 = W, 160TH AVE. �y,� L E 160TH AVE. 7�1YOPOSED W-47 / r / \ N / 1p �. Z o I s.ro 71,....--1 .. = 0 1 1 } 12 -a Ix�ioNoiM� I 2ti It y < • 17 � il$ 147 13 SB - 45 ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT 1:2? PRESENT AND PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE 3000 MUNICIPALITY IN THE VICINITY OF THE �, PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS. 0 6000 PRESENT STREETS, AND THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SUCH STREETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE PATTERN IN THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED. 1 OF 3 7c' L '`��r �'��✓�=y ' ® I� APRIL 28, 19$9 \ , iI. /I n�`� �'�\✓' �\`, ;VP;.. s I 166 s.s /•,C-A7-‘4, " Lowe 2 r/1• 1 n. ; / ,- 33 33 ' 34 35 ' PROPOSED ANNEXATION .a.rt ...-.\rai f ,/ //Al fbltTk% (S:c�:..I) .-._ ( f I So r � n . . ten' EXISTING CITY LIMITS ) : — • \ "•. (� rat .: r'\ r— / _ ;, �� z i'� / I I r h°' f� / /h :s ref 7� Lr 11bA 1 ; j r ' N; EXISTING CITY LIMITS J I Iiz-- 7C\,I' 4k- ' / ,2• 7��./ vas?'' 9 1 ti SB - 45 ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT MAJOR TRUNK WATER LINES, AND THE PROPOSED It? EXTENSION OF SUCH UTILITY LINES IN THE �/ VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION. 4r, caw mina ... '•+. 'wry.h.1d_ ---.r-Si. • ' curse Ya- %NO. Aiwa lemelani CD -wan'es-11:6I - .. Y•O.OIm_tna Y(a1O.Q Wan —j— PROPOSED Y.A—.O.a.e.Om.w.o.. -- ,.aoROaa.wO • ^'RO.O.1L Y.[AYSt Run 00 0.00.1110 RANT • nda[O.lama YJw1 20F3 ;.,Nl :0`,.---._ •--1.-143 � • �,, APRIL 28, 1989 ' , ,-ICJ � ' » ' N0RTNGLENN . -, ., J ,' • ' TREATMENT PLANT , N. 33 33 34 35 • ? Z. LIFT STATION PROPOSED , r 0.05 MGD - • . ANNEXATION i • rr W 168TH AVENilt. 7) C ,.,. , / 4" FORCE f �. -47, -.4,---- ♦ O _._.� \\ _ I MAIN 'Y: \ r_ , n . , EXISTING CITY LIMITS -- '' 8.- I - t, 4 DIET-aT v, 1 `� - ,0.30 v: ti I MGD W / .. } ,: 3t v b Atic i Z, Y a. {7 • .& -- - - - I S z1 ` /` I .. "'� _ __. ..r�, • 1166TH AVEJ 0..it., i_ _, - . . A!N �_ /tea° �,� EXISTING CITY LIMITS— _ I • y / ✓ `b` ( 12" "1 1v. ,• 4.... ... . . , ' J / I . , / / 9 •, • FORCE _c � . I SB - 45 ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT PRESENT SEWER INTERCEPTORS AND OUTFALLS. /4I? AND THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SUCH 1...m) UTILITY LINES IN THE VICINITY OF THE ?ROPOSED ANNEXATION. 4 O ccwc ,.W r ARCH 10,•a•. • (.p7.0*ADTCWAren rgArwpr •I.., 1-... -__._a N.,,!,Alreli.'(/no4,SAWS.ntj,,01 in inCMf —o— IMIIIMP iM19TIDM M DAMN imp PIPE MASER ■a— SACS UP!ITS. MSS ANSI.NIS FO S,INM, D,S S w Sou (De wAAn1w.rq CALLU Mn MA NMe.ASA ww.AAn.NYM.^pw —•- 'MAvIwATR.AS Nosor• w.,uwAren M.AR°• JQM1. 3OF3 J EXHIBIT A lizlimoDUM OF AGREEMENT NES. 49-89 , THIS AGRED ENT is voluntarily made and entered into this L day of it„ , 1989, by and between the CITY OF BROOMFIELD, COLORA;T, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and The Weld County Line Ltd. , a Colorado Limited Partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "Property Owner") . WITNESS E T H : Whereas, the Property Owner is the owner of certain real property (the "Property") situated in the County of Adams, State of Colorado, which Property is described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner desires to have the Proper- ty annexed to the City; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to include in this Agree- ment certain provisions, understandings, and agreements regarding the Property and its annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, premises, mutual covenants, and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. Annexation. The annexation of the Property shall be in accordance with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, as amended. 2. Master Plan For Property. The City shall have a master land use plan (the "Master Plan") prepared for the Property at the City's expense. The Master Plan shall be prepared in a manner that satisfies the Broomfield Municipal Code's provisions for P.U.D. plans. 3. Coordination of Annexation. Master Plan. and 2onina. 3.1 Master Plan. 3 . 1(a) The City Council has received an annexation petition for the Property, has initiated annexation and zoning proceedings, and has authorized preparation of the Master Plan concurrently herewith. 3. 1(b) The planning consultant will work with the Property Owner and the City staff in preparing the Master Plan. 3. 1(c) After the Master Plan is approved by the Property Owner, the Master Plan will be submitted to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission and to the City Council as a RECEiViD 4689 -1- CITY.CLE E;'` ,' proposed P.U.D. Plan for the Property and as a proposed amendment to the City's 1988 Master Plan. The Property Owner shall notify the City when it is satisfied with the form of the Master Plan and desires to submit it for the City's formal review. The City shall then have ninety days to review the Master Plan. If the City does not approve the Master Plan in a form which satisfies the Property Owner within the ninety day period, the Property Owner may void the annexation by written notification to the City. Such notification must be received by the City within 30 days of Council action on the Master Plan, or within 30 days after the expiration of the ninety day review period, whichever is sooner. If the Property Owner gives notice that it is voiding the annexation, the annexation of the Property shall thereupon become null and void, and of no force or effect. 3. 1(d) The Property Owner desires a roadway along the west line of the property described in Exhibit A, to be constructed in conformance with the City of Broomfield develop- ment policies. If such a roadway is constructed as an arterial roadway, the City will participate in 1/3 of the cost of con- structing the arterial section of the road. The intersection of this roadway with Colorado Highway 7 is subject to the State Highway Department Access Code. The actual location and classi- fication of the road will be determined during the preparation of the Master Plan, subject to the Property Owner's approval. After determination of the road location and classification, the Property Owner will convey to the City, by good and sufficient warranty deed, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, up to one-half of the right-of-way along the west line of the Property. 3.2. zoning. The P.U.D. zoning shall be permanent and may be changed only upon application of the Property Owner or its successors. 4. Water and Sewer Service. 4.1 Installation of Mains. The City, at the time of devel- opment of the Property in whole or in any part, will at its own cost install and extend to the Property water and sewer mains sufficiently sized to serve the developing portion of the Proper- ty. The City's ultimate obligation to extend water and sewer mains shall be limited to what is necessary to serve the Property as it will ultimately develop, as shown on the Master Plan de- scribed in paragraph 3. 1 above. 4.2 Rights-of-Way. The Property Owner will dedicate rights-of-way within the Property to the City for said lines. 4.3 pines within the Property. Future developers of the Property will install water and sewer lines through the Property. -2- 4689 4.4 Water and sewer licenses. The City agrees that the fees for water and sewer licenses for the Property, for develop- ment as shown on the Master Plan referred to in paragraph 3.1 above, shall not exceed the current fees, escalated at the rate of 7% per annum, compounded annually. If the fees in effect when a license is purchased are more than this limit, the City shall waive the difference. Alternatively the Property Owner may, at its discretion, purchase water and sewer licenses at the then current fee. The arrangement described in this section shall expire ten years from the date the Property is fully annexed. 5. Wgter Riah_ts. The Property Owner hereby dedicates the non-tributary ground water underlying the Property to the City. Said dedication shall not affect, in any way, existing wells on the Property. 6. Reimbursemgnt. Prior to commencement of annexation proceed- ings with the City of Broomfield, the Property Owner had caused certain studies relative to the property to be completed. As these studies will be of value to the City in completing the work contemplated in Paragraph 3 above, the City hereby purchas- es all rights to the studies from the Property Owner for $7, 171. Such payment shall be made within 30 days after the second reading of the ordinance annexing the property. 7. Highway 7. The City administers the State Highway Access Code within its municipal boundaries. The City shall exercise its best efforts to provide the Property Owner the points of access shown on the approved Master Plan, and such other or further points of access as are consistent with the State Highway Access Code. 8. Aoolicability of City Policies. The Property, upon annexa- tion, and all subsequent development of the Property shall be subject to and bound by the applicable provisions of the Broomfield City Charter and the applicable provisions of the Broomfield Municipal Code, as amended, provided, however, that changes or amendments to the Charter or the Code after the date of this Agreement shall in no way limit or impair the City's obligations hereunder. 9. Termination. If the annexation of the Property is, for any reason, not completed or this Agreement is not approved by the City Council, then this Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect whatsoever. 10. Severability. The fact that any portion of this Agreement may be held to be unenforceable shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining portions hereof. -3- 4689 11. Binding Agreement. This Agreement, when executed, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on the successors in interest or the legal representatives of the parties hereto, including all purchasers and subsequent owners of any lots or parcels within the Property. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties and may be amended only in writ- ing, approved in substantially the same manner as the Agreement itself. 12. Recording of Agreement. This Agreement shall be recorded with the Adams County Clerk and Recorder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the date set forth above. The Weld ty ne td. a Color im P nership By Ke t L. lckenb ugh General Part STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. _ COUNTY OF4 ) The foregoing . instrument was acknowledged before me this //Wday of and , 1989 by Kent L. Rickenbaugh, as General . Partner of The W arid Line Ltd. a Limited Partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires 4- 8 ei/ . .,;.dam.-----..,!/`, rth i f 10 I �QM na.:VI ,1 r \\ t\ Notary Public x i PATTNC,h WM:NG T \o iketrrc•n*Cr -4- 4689 r CITY OF BROOMFIELD, a municipal corporation 7 $y: sl?><9hurtz, Mayor kTTEST: Mcuct, vicki Marc,aty Clerk -5- 4689 EXHIBIT A TO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY A parcel of land situated in the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Adams, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center Quarter Corner of said Section 3; thence South 89°27'47" East along the South line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 3 a distance of 863.10 feet; to the Westerly right-of-way of State Highway 1-25; thence along said Westerly right-of-way the following six (6) courses: 1 . North 22°42 '00" East a distance of 558.11 feet; 2. North 14°10'00" East a distance of 202.20 feet; 3 . North 22°42'00" East a distance' of 281.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 4 . North 22°42 ' 00" East a distance of 618.65 feet; 5. North 14°33' 30" East a distance of 192.20 feet; 6. North 32°09'00" West a distance of 682.78 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of State Highway No. 7, said point also being 100.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; Thence along said Southerly right-of-way the following three (3) courses: 1 . South 89°48'00" West, parallel to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section, a distance of 563. 41 feet; 2 . North 56°21 ' 30" West a distance of 44.89 feet to a point being 75.00 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; 3. South 89°48'00" West, parallel to the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section a distance of 362 . 35 feet; Thence South 00°00'00" East a distance of 1346 .73 feet; thence South 89°27 ' 47" East a distance of 1039 . 46 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 36.00 acres (more or less) . • MINUTES CF THE WELD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT April 27, 1989 A regular meeting of the Weld County Board of Adjustment was held on Thursday, April 27, 1989. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (#101) , 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order at 3:40 p.m. by the chairman, Paul Allen. Tape 59 - Side 1 ROLL CALL James Adams Present Raymond Mora Present Dennis Gesterling Present Ed Dolan Present Donald Mason Present Bob Sorensen Absent - telephoned Kirk Schweitzer Present Barry Sullivan Present Paul Allen Present ASSOCIATE MEMBERS: Sidney Walker Present Dianne Hajec Absent David Woronoff Absent - Telephoned A quorum and a full board was present. Also present: Brian Bingle, Current planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary. The minutes of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Board of Adjustment held on March 23, 1989, were approved as distributed. CASE NUMBER: BOA-947 APPLICANT: Frederick and Shirley Leis REQUEST: A variance to waive the public sewer requirement in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3 of the SE} SE} of Section 9, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1 ,575 feet east of the City of Greeley; north of East 20th Street and west of Bluebell Avenue The Chairman asked Brian Bingle to read the request of the applicant into the record. eft,Vit) Minutes of the Weld County Board of Adjustment April 27, 1989 Page 2 APPEARANCE: Fred Leis, property owner and applicant, stated the City of Greeley sewer is about 560 feet from their property. They would like the Board to waive the - requirement that they must be on public sewer in a Residential zone district so a septic tank can be installed on the property they wish to resubdivide. They have lived at this site for over twenty years. The soil is quite - gravelly, and they have not had any problems with their individual system. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. MOTION: Ed Dolan moved Case Number BOA-947 for Frederick and Shirley Leis for a variance to waive the public sewer system requirement in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zone district be approved based on the recommendation and conditions presented by the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the Board of Adjustment. Motion seconded by Dennis Gesterling. - The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Board. - Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Board of Adjustment for their decision. Ed Dolan - yes; James Adams - yes; Raymond Mora - yes; Dennis Gesterling - yes; Barry Sullivan - yes; Donald Mason - yes; Kirk Schweitzer - yes; Sidney Walker - yes; Paul Allen - yes. Motion carried unanimously. - The Chairman announced the variance granted. The meeting was adjourned at 3:50 p.m. - Respectfully submitted. libbca Bobbie Good - Secretary • I s U BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MOTION TO GRANT GR DENY APPEAL . Case No. BOA-947 April 27, 1989 APPEAL OF Frederick and Shirley Leis Address: 1017 East 20th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 Moved by _f,�,(, 71.ed Y. �l ger--- that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Board of Adjustment: Be it resolved by the Weld County Board of Adjustment that the appeal of Frederick and Shirley Leis for a variance to waive the public sewer system requirement in the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zone district on the following described property: Lot 3 of the SE{ of the SE} of Section 9, T5N, R6SW of the 6th P.M. , as platted by Union Colony of Colorado. be granted (7 a for the following reasons: Based upon the submitted application materials and other relevant information regarding this request, the Board of Adjustment approvals the request. It is the Board's opinion that this requested relief is not detrimental to the public good or contrary to the purpose and intent of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the R-1 (Low Density Residential) zone district. This determination is based, in part, upon the following: - The variance requested is the minimum variance possible for making reasonable use of the lot; - - The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, and will not be injurious to the public health, safety or welfare of the surrounding land uses; _ - The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received - any objections to this request; and - The Weld County Health Department has no objections to this request. Motion seconded by : . n C, .( .,. . Vote: For Granting o�f Appeal For Denial of Appeal 7 I / .I ,C. — .J 6.6,rae„._ Or-4 ,Jc-i ,p- "re.per��--Cr• y/ nil I, /ICE /lk.(rr': 71 tv ice; «(C.----,.0),0 c .rc•n., 77,-(42.174(' . 2 Frederick and Shirley Leis LOA-947 Page 2 The Board of Adjustment's approval is conditional upon the applicant obtaining: 1 . A Veld County Septic Permit for the proposed home. The septic system shall be installed a•.ccording to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. 2. An ISDS evaluation on the existing septic system. BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION ) CAUSE NO. 112 . • AND ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES ) TO GOVERN OPERATIONS IN THE IGNACIO ) "` r BLANCO FIELD, LA PLATA AND ARCHULETA ) N r .;;, �" ; COUNTIES, COLORADO ) 2j)2- 'a + i ,-' . I NOTICE OF HEARING � MAY 3 S,1, TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONC OR-tcLwv. couo = On June 17, 1988, the Commission authorized Order No. 112-60 to be entered which among other: things,' established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of methane gas from the Fruitland Coal Seams in the Ignacio Blanco Field in La Plata and Archuleta Counties, Colorado. The units consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or N1/2 and S1/2 of each section. On March 31, 1989, Meridian Oil, Inc. , by its attorney, filed with the Commission a verified application for an order pooling all interests in the unit consisting of the W1/2 Section 12, Township 32 North, Range 10 West, N.M.P.M. , for the development and operation of the Fruitland Coals Seams for production of gas and associated hydrocarbons underlying said unit, pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes 34-60-116, as amended. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, May 15, 1989 Tuesday, May 16, 1989 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Denver, Colorado Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statue. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than May 9, 1989, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION O THE STATE OF COLORADO By ' t a274��/' i ennis R. Bick elf, Secretary Dated at Denver, Colorado April 5, 1989 $q BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROMULGATION AND ) CAUSE NO. 139 ESTABLISHMENT OF FIELD RULES TO GOVERN ) TLil trv*Y i,mry-y,?73 OPERATIONS IN THE RULISON FIELD, ink n.fi GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ) I r� E NOTICE OF HEARING I , MAY 31989 s) TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERJ�+' ORLELEN. COLO, On December 10, 1959, the Commission authorized Order No. 139-1 to be issued, which among other things,`' ' established 640-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of gas from the Mesaverde formation underlying certain lands in Garfield County, Colorado On June 16, 1979 the Commission authorized Order No. 139-8 which amended Order No. 139-1 and established 320-acre drilling and spacing units for the production of gas from the Mesaverde formation. The drilling units consist of the E1/2 and W1/2 or N1/2 and S1/2 of a section with the permitted well to be located in the NE1/4 and SWl/4 of each section and no closer than 600 feet to the boundaries of the quarter section upon which it is located, and no closer than 1,200 feet from another producing or producible well in the same formation. Order No. 139-8 was adopted to include the below listed lands: Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6th P.M. Sections 5 thru 8: All Sections 17 thru 20: All Township 6 South, Range 94 West, 6th P.M. Section 1 thru 3: All Sections 8 thru 17: All Sections 19 Thru 24: All Section 27 thru 33: All On April 3, 1989, Barrett Energy Company, by its attorney, filed a verified application for an order allowing an exception location for a well to be drilled in the center of the SEX/4 of Section 27 and an exception location for a well to be drilled in the center of the SE1/4 of Section 28, both said Sections in Township 6 South, Range 94 West, 6th P.M. , Garfield County, Colorado. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, May 15, 1989 Tuesday, May 16, 1989 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Denver, Colorado Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statue. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than May 9, 1989, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE 0 COLORADO BY die Dennis R ICcne I, Secretary Dated at Denver, Colorado April 5, 1989 BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE MC ELMO DOME ) CAUSE NO: +3'89" (LEADVILLE) UNIT DOLORES AND MONTEZUMA ) COUNTIES, COLORADO rs ' MAY 31989 i J NOTICE OF HEARING ii7 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: - cnca 7 On October 19, 1982, the Commission 4tPorized Order No. ' 389-1 to be issued which approved a certain Unit Agreement and Unit Operating Agreement providing for involuntary unit operations of a reservoir consisting of the Leadville formation of Mississippian Age underlying the McElmo Dome Unit Area, which produces carbon dioxide. At the time of hearing 87% of the interests required to pay the costs of unit operation had approved the unit; subsequent to the hearing on March 29, 1983 the Commission was advised that in excess of 80% of owners of interests that will be free of costs had approved the Unit Agreement contains the below listed provisions: " [181 (e) Any Federal lease for a fixed term of twenty (20) years or any renewal thereof or any part of such lease which is made subject to this Agreement shall continue in force beyond the term provided therein until the termination thereof. Any other Federal lease [i.e. the Lease] committed hereto shall continue in force beyond the term so provided therein or by law as to the land committed so long as such lease remains subject hereto, provided that production is had in paying quantities under this Agreement prior to the expiration date of the term of such lease, or in the event actual drilling operations are commenced on Unitized Lands, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, prior to the end of the primary term of such lease and are being diligently prosecuted at that time such lease shall be extended for two years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities in accordance with the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1960. [18) (f) Each sublease or contract (i.e. the Letter Agreement) relating to the operation and development of unitized Substances from lands of the United States committed to this agreement, which by its terms would expire prior to the time at which the underlying lease, as extended by the immediately preceding paragraph, will expire, is hereby extended beyond any such terms so provided therein so that it shall continue in full force and effect for and during the term of the underlying lease as such term is herein extended. " On March 27, 1989, Lloyd Hayes, by his attorney, filed with the Commission an application for an amendment to the McElmo Dome Unit Agreement specifically deleting therefrom Paragraph [18] (f) , and such other and additional provisions as may appear to be appropriate from the evidence in the record, that are consistent with the request made in said application. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, May 15, 1989 Tuesday, May 16, 1989 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Denver, Colorado Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statue. • Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than May 9, 1989, briefly - stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee of forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO By ennis R.Ø42a' , Secretary Dated at Denver, Colorado April 6, 1989 - 2 - (389) BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OP THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF A GAS INJECTIVITY ) CAUSE NO. 468 c TEST IN THE BLEDSOE RANCH FIELD ) ;aT ',� CHEYENNE COUNTY, COLORADO ) r^ �„ � 1 r 3;3 - .. r1 NOTICE OF HEARING MAY 31989 $1. TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN ',� On October 18, 1988, Union Pacific Resources Company made application for a gas injectivity test into the Morrow Sand at the well Grays State 24-36 located in the SEX/4 SW1/4 Section 36, Township 12 South, Range 51 West, 6th P.M., Cheyenne County, Colorado. Administrative approval was given for a testing period to expire on March 21, 1989. Union Pacific Resources Company requested a 120-day extension on March 13, 1989. The extension was not granted pending a hearing before the Commission. On April 4, 1989 Union Pacific Resources Company, by its attorney, filed a verified application requesting the matter be heard by the Commission and that approval be given to extend the injectivity test at the above well until July 19, 1989. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of the State of Colorado, pursuant to the above, has scheduled the above-entitled matter for hearing on: Date: Monday, May 15, 1989 Tuesday, May 16, 1989 Time: 8:30 a.m. Place: Room 101, State Education Building 201 East Colfax Denver, Colorado Pursuant to said hearing in the above-entitled matter at the time and place aforesaid, or at any adjourned meeting, the Commission will enter such orders as it deems appropriate to prevent the waste of oil and gas, either or both, in the operations of said field, and to carry out the purposes of the statue. Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of ' the application or to intervene should file with the Commission a written protest or a notice to intervene no later than May 9, 1989, briefly stating the basis of the protest or intervention. Such interested party shall, at the time, serve a copy of the protest or notice to intervene to the person filing the application. A fee oil forty-five dollars ($45.00) shall accompany each document filed with the Commission. IN THE NAME OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE; STATE OF COLORADO By 44`le/ enriis R. is ne 1, Secretary Dated at Denver, Colorado April 5, 1989 A i o3,,, 3AthA,a SU"L*`.ARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 2, 1989 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on May 2, 1989, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor (#101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Bud Halldorson at 1 :30 p.m. Tape 344 - Side 2 Ann Garrison Absent - telephoned Jerry Burnett Absent - telephoned Ivan Gosnell Absent - telephoned Lynn Brown Present LeAnn Reid Present Rick Iverson Present Jerry Kiefer Present Ernie Ross Present Bud H.alldorson Present Also present: Brian Bingle, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary A quorum was present. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on April 18, 1989, was approved as distributed. CASE NUMBER: Z-449 APPLICANT: Harold Reese, Jr. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI of Section 10, and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25. Brian Bingle reported the applicant has requested that this case be continued to the May 16, 1989, meeting of the Planning Commission to allow the referral agencies an opportunity to review and respond to additional information submitted by the applicant. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. MOTION: Ernie Ross moved Case Number Z-449 for Harold Reese, Jr. , for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to a Planned Unit Development be continued to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on May 16, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. to allow the referral agencies time to review and respond to additional information. Motion seconded by Lynn Brown. Vr.01"-..-91e1\ h' I . - Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 1989 Page 2 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. No further discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Lynn — Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ernie Ross - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. - CASE NUMBER: Amend L'SR-726 APPLICANT: Ralph Nix Produce, Incorporated REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and an Amendment to a Special Review permit to vacate Development Standard #4 which required - screening on the south and east property lines. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEI of Section 14, T4N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1 .5 miles northeast of the Town of Gilcrest, -- approximately 3 miles southwest of the Town of LaSalle, north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 44, and east of Highway 85. APPEARANCE: Tom C. Hellerich, Attorney, Dinner, Hellerich, and Lazar, represented the applicant. They are only asking for one thing different from the original approved request, and that is that they not be required to screen the property on the south and east sides where Weld County Roads 35 and 44 - intersect. Screening would cause blind and dangerous conditions at this - intersection. He submitted a petition with the signature of area residents asking that this requirement be waived. This was retained as evidence. Tape 345 - Side 1 Bud Halldorson reported he had done an on-site inspection. The buildings and equipment on this site are nicely grouped on the property. In his opinion, this property does not lend itself to screening. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. - The Chairman asked the applicant if they had reviewed the recommendation, conditions, and development standards presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff. Mr. Hellerich stated they have and do not object to any of these. Since there has been no objections from the audience, the Chairman asked that these items be filed with the summary as a permanent - record of these proceedings. II � Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 1989 Page 3 MOTION: Lynn Brown moved Case Number Amended USR-726 for Ralph Nix Produce, Inc. , for a Site Specific Development Plan and an Amendment to a Special Review permit to vacate Development Standard #4, which required screening on the south and east property lines, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation for approval based on the recommendation, conditions, and development standards set forth by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer — yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ernie Ross - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-878 APPLICANT: Daniel Ochsner and Barry Payant REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility located in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 31, part of the SE; of Section 30, and part of the SW; of Section 29, all in T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 700 feet south of the Town of Evans, approximately 2,100 feet north of the Town of La Salle, west and east of Highway 85, and north of Veld County Road 394. Brian Bingle reported the applicant has not yet obtained an uncontested contract for the purchase of the property. This continuance would enable the applicant time to satisfy the purchase contract, which then would provide him with the ability to act upon the property. The satisfaction of this contract would also provide adequate access to the proposed site. Therefore, they are asking that this request be continued until May 16, 1989. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 1989 Page 4 MOTION: Jerry Kiefer moved Case Number USR-878 for Daniel 0chsner and Barry Payant for a Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility located in the Agricultural zone district be continued until to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on May 16, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. to allow the applicants time to satisfy the purchase contract on this property. Motion seconded by Ernie Ross. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. No further discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jerry Kiefer - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Lynn Brown - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Ernie Ross - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 1 :55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ZOLlia.ss Coda Bobbie Good Secretary CQ'C,,,� �,A T+r e I vl O1ttpher of Commerce, ti ` n `= e 0 \ • y . / THE HEART OE THE P0UDRE VALLEY H°'�^ay or conrr°`�" BOX 397,WINDSOR,COLORADO 80550 May 2, 1939 Mr. Kirby, Chairman Mid County Commissioners _ Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 30631 Dear BM. : ?laid County Road 62_, as you know, could connect Windsor' s ��corporate limits ith the 1-25 industrial corridor. The Chamber of Commerce adds its voice to those you have heard from, to ask for consideration of improvin; the cxistin; road and buildin:; about a mile of new road to make this connection, A now and rather recuin; consideration exists 7indoor has the possibility of an industry which would drive 100 trucks a day down. Main Street. 7e all can ima„ins the pandemonium this would create and the .strop;; op?osition thc school, could eneratc. The industry mi; ht be oer:5uaded to r o that much ,youth of town to „et to 1-25; they will not consider going as far as I:; 34. {bad 62 certainly would be a. boon at this time. _ ✓ ditionally, ma'I,in,5 this connection to the industrial corridor and airport would mean the likely choice of ','indoor aG home to many of the people working for 7almart, '..ioldco and other companies. There wouldseem to be come real economic benefit to COmpl it tl n� ;;C:2 J . ';:c do understand road money demand to exceed the supply. ;;o know you will do what you can, and we wont to assure you of the Chamber, :.. _.u_ port and trcn;' desire for thin road. .3inccrely yours, - amratedielor )avid L. Show:), ''resident indoor Chamber of Commerce dls/cjr ea �q • V1 �0 COG?�?Y Highway • 8 s ,, • (;,,f f 8 Colorado Department of Highways '• • CLERK 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO. 80222 TO TEE BOARD For More Information: 757-9228 #89-17 APRIL 27, 1989 CONSTRUCTION BIDDING ACTIVITY FOR APRIL 27 CAMP 61-0009-36 S.H. 9 NORTH OF SILVRRTHORNE Resurfacing and safety work on S.H. 9 seventeen miles north of Silverthorne. in Summit county, which includes hot bituminous pavement, striping and guardrail. Number of bidders: Five (5) Apparently successful bidder: $155,144 from Asphalt Paving Company of Golden Calls for completion within: 20 working days Resident engineer: Wes Goff, Frisco HES 0004(31), U.S. 287 NORTH OF S.H. 66 NEAR LONGMONT Median curb replacement near Longmont on U.S. 287 just north of S.H. 66 which includes hot bituminous pavement and curb, located in Boulder county. Number of bidders: Five (5). Apparently successful bidder: $41,506 from Colorado Construction & Concrete, Inc. of Longmont Calls for completion within: 15 working days Resident engineer: Hal Toland, Boulder 21-117_1(11 PECOS ST. AT 64th AVE. IN ADAMS COUNTY CC 12-1377-01 Intersection improvement near 64th Avenue on Pecos St. in Adams county north of Denver, including bridge replacement over Clear Creek near the new Interstate 76 route, combined project which begins three tenths of a mile north of 1-76 and extends three tenths of a mile north, consisting of channel improvements. Work elements include aggregate base course, drainage, waterline, clearing and grubbing, landscaping, plant mixed seal coat, hot bituminous pavement, channel attenuator, retaining wall, and striping. Number of bidders: Seven (7) Apparently successful bidder: $1,983,030 from Flatiron Structures Company of Longmont Calls for completion within: 160 calendar days Preconstruction Project Manager: David Stevenson Resident engineer: Skip Hlad, Denver (over) (5)./ww.,1-, (2,v II Highway News Page 2 ADS TO BE OPENED ADD: MAY 11. 20:00 a.m.. resurfacing 5 1/4 miles of S.H. 67 in Teller county south of U.S. 24 at Divide, consisting of heating and scarifying treatment, hot bituminous pavement overlay, plant mixed seal coat, guardrail, signing and striping, SR 0067(3) . 10:15 a.m. . phase I of Interstate 76 bridge rehabilitation which includes timber shoring, located on southbound 1-76 at U.S. 85 in Adams county, IR 76-1(148). NEW: MAY 18. 9:30 a.m. . resurfacing and minor widening of East Sixth Avenue in Aurora between West Del Mar Circle and Havana Street, for eight tenths of a mile, which includes drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, hot bituminous pavement, signalization, topsoil, seeding and mulching, in Arapahoe county, CX-•CX(GF) 10-0030-14. 9:45 a.m. . resurfacing and minor widening on South Road near Lombard Village southeast of Pueblo, for 1.4 mile between 27th Lane and 30th lane in Pueblo county, consisting of grading, hot bituminous pavement, plant mixed seal coat, striping, and curb and gutter, MR 3034(3) . NEW: JULY 6. 9:30 a.m. . Interstate 70 tunneling for the HANGING LAKE TUNNEL in Glenwood Canyon, which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous and concrete paving, plant mixed seal coat, Cinnamon Creek channel relocation, tunnel excavation and ventilation building, beginning about 6.6 miles east of Glenwood Springs and extending 2.8 miles east in Garfield county, ID 070-2(13e). NOTE: A pre-bid conference will be held at the Department of Highways Headquarters Building, 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. , Denver, beginning at 9:00 a.m. , on June 6. Potential bidders must attend the pre-bid conference and also visit the project site. OfRACTS AWARDED Road/ Bid Contract Pro ect Street Descriotion Awarded to O2Eening Awarded CXBRS 28-0131-16 S.H. 131 in Bridge Jalisco 4/13/89 4/21/89 Yampa replacement International, Inc. $192,330 Award Coals MBE 10.1% WBE 4.5% Committed MBE 10.3% WBE 27.69% FR 040-2(28) U.S. 40 east Minor widening Duran &Pearce 4/13/89 4/19/89 of Craig Contractors $215,613 SET-ASIDE PROJECT IR 25-2(201) 1-25 at Intersection Siegrist Const. 4/6/89 4/14/89 Lincoln Ave. improvements Company in Douglas $5,633,229 - county Award Goals DBE 6% Committed DBE 7.79% Iv -�} STATE OF COLORADO C95Q ADOCDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH owc nr- err - +�,•4210 Eacrrtals.Aven3e tit.s A Y 1 Denver, Colorado 80220Phone (303) 320-8333 • Roy Romer Governor May 1, 1989 Thomas M.Vernon, M.D. Executive Director Weld County Commissioners 915 10th St. Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Letters of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage Sludge in Weld County from Liquid Waste Management in Behalf of the City of Greeley Dear County Commissioners: The Permits and Enforcement Section of the Colorado Department of Health has received Letters of Intent to Apply Domestic Sewage Sludge from the above referenced entity for the following sites within your county. Site Name Legal Description Jack Wells Site LWM # 403 Section 15, Range 63 West, Township 6 North Jack Wells Site LWM # 407 North Half of Section 20, Range 63 West, Township 6 North If you would like any additional information as to the scope and nature of these beneficial use land application projects, do not hesitate to contact me at (303) 331-4555. Please direct any comments or concerns to this office within 15 days of receipt of this letter. Sincerely, David R. Rogers Engineering/Physical Sciences Technician Permits and Enforcement Section WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION xc: Weld County Health Department Soil Conservation District Victor Sainz, District Engineer Files (Site # 0316, 0317) APPLICATION FOR LETTER OF APPROVAL 10 UTILIZE SLUDGE ON LANG AND/OR 10 DIS- TRIBUTE SLUDGE FOR UTILIZATION ON LAND. (Application to be submitted to the Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, 4210 E. 11Ui Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80220. ) (Check One) Dried Stabilized Sludge Sat' Yyy Liquid Stabilized Sludge i'I03 i . Date: 2- 17-89 2. Producer: City of Greeley W. W. T. P. Address: 1000 10Th . St . Greeley Co. 3. Name of User: Liquid Waste Management/ Jack Wells • 4. Address of User: 900 Coffman Longmont Co . / 32010 Weld County Rd . 63 G111 . co. 5. Phone Number of User: S10-9811 / 152-2952 6. Location Where Sludge is to be Used: T6N , x63W, SEC 15 7. Distance (feet, yards, miles) to nearest: (a) Stream N/A ; (b) Pond N/A (c) Well N/A Other Water Supply (describe) N/A 8. Amount of Sludge Desired (Dry Tons): As per recommended in item 11 9. Actually Loaded (Dry Tons) : • 10. Number of Acres to Receive Sludge 640 11 . Application rate (Dry Tons per Acre) As ner recommended by C .D .H. 12. Describe Use(s) of Sludge (e.g., Soil Conditioning of Farmland, Garden, Yard, Reclamation of Nutrient Deficient Land, as Fertilizer, Other): Fertilizer 6 soil conditioner • 13i Manner in Which Sludge is to be Applied: Surface apply 14. Will Sludge be Stockpiled Cefore Application: Yes No (Circle One) 15. Estimated Length of Time Sludge is •to be Stockpiled: N/A 16. Type of Crops to be Grown on Sludge Conditioned Land: Grassland • • 17 ,• Grades of Sludge II The information set forth above is true andico;r4e e to the best of my knowledge. WOOD, PERMIT SECTION User's Signature Producer's Signature cc Scott Perkins , Weld County Health Dept . To be completed for each separate agreement with User. 7 IX Tit /1 liquid wastemanageement ir - — — p Date: 2-17-89 I Jack Wells give my permission to Liquid Waste Management, Inc. to dispose of digested sludge in accordance with all Federal, State, and EPA regulations on my property located at: Legal Discription: T6N. R63W. SEC 15 - Signed: 9.---2O ......, ---- (Land op) P. O. Box 888 • 900 Coffman Street, Suite U • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 6517LBU - laquid waste mrla gement any ST ?di • MEASURES TO PRECLUDE SUBJECT CROP FROM ENTERING DIREJCT MOD CHAIN - I Jack Wells verify that the crop which is harvested from T6N , R63W, SEC 15 in which sludge from the City of Greeley Waste Water Plant plant was applied is not going directly to the public food chain. Oopfl- ralvna--, Authorized Representative ov/irter/Fa - Liquid Waste Management, Inc. Date: 2— 7- 29 Date: „�-- � f9 P. O. Box 888 • 900 Coffman Street, Suite D • Longmont, CO 80501 • (303) 651-70'70 ___ _ ._. 7 . A.066 • 0 ••••qa.....,*je' l/lii• 1 • \ s,` , I r� e y/ 1 4 q n I ` I O I .. q I 1 l L /�,p� o I (_l11 . I �, 12 - ) 8 ‘1 is• 0 Io „' \ I 0 I. / i N " 13 !� ,- • I 'N) ! 1 i. "Poin I of Rocks `1 \ iY 17 p l 11� i�l 1 !� �4 , ' 1�3 1 18 I 1 h OKEr/ • ;17 we1D I /f, i6 �� \ 49)94 In N � OM II ` I y1 1 694 • \ a'fl il r l ¢ I 9 II ,r‘\\ n na III 20 • 1 C 220 a„It 21,.1 II 221 ',, ;I - 23 ) ,1 2a 19 ,I � /�� C / A !! `r—.mot.. seo' .J� (\r \ 1 ..1{ \M / i V i' ' .. I• !I 1 1` 4.I J 11 I il a\_ A n j - e l/ 1 •• a 29\ 29��/ >�i.7e 28', �2 �'d 26 )(/ j 25' / it 30 ! c `•,. 1 J*}! 1ii t �,. r l.. I a• \ 1 r3 1 se00Nsj I•a ii. ♦ „ ♦ lei i• r, I\ r• se pse/J " ' / 36 I j 31 �! 32 I) 133 of 35 32 fir 1 3a \ al Y M ! �l v Zi_ ,1 t(�� A 1� e �' r.es I T \� �� n.9 i �� 4 \psi e- �\ �♦ i r ' � .- Y •. _ N n .r '/ b4. i II eA .,� 1 Se __ �_•. .. Li •41.73 11 5 • o Z/ _ r rp. I I '''ytI • a x II „ }I �/ � 4j� R\ *a I.-. 1n •/ e a / A 3 • a V .T o/f,� . �. 0 6 I 9 �,; p Its n/ '\ / q \1�u10 • . . 1 as n (� 1 ic- ar I i � II / 1111 (� ♦ . I n U \ MY.,. i 1'1i“ V/ ,A\ ' a I,,�tl J I:.. I --pi \ ' - 4 1 I In ' I ° • •• •. / ,- x / t1iI, ',' •,+ ,$)- In r � ( I /. ‘::::1, ‘\ ' (\ i Ir 4 Ir _.t_ c.I 11,41 f..� ii, Isu\.�/ `-• +I t-": + -`-- I TI U 1({"�:�w11J ,) .,•VIA" , 1 • A cI�V __ �, Q` t • I„ i.•p > 1 i p Ip /17 O. s• '1116. Ila I 15 I / 14 I 131 _ S"67! • / ,1 y 0 11G. µ rI I� 6•`9 - /sz• IlL -•_ }Y� , /inii,:*--1. �; i0)7,...—. •n •••— _.. ____-_�I 1 '"•• ". I�-___ ". R / - e Trir' 1¢„.". • 411 I 1.— .S414 .. I' ..r* {� M .+.+Jib ' Ig.rig, ,.: 4 1• " H . , O /� ''�w5y''♦ ••Y� . 1 t h Ka � d .,,� 4. vi ' f !of "+' �". .. .1 • • _ti Nosrl Hi�ppp y �A . yA.4" ry...{, '\,+: '• �\ i...ft,.♦l, rv — co a. �+ v 04, N r .i . +.kg4; r5J♦� , .J .• • .� of \ 4.:-t: ♦ y+ttir Y i - r e. PfFtiv • •a � cif � , 9 9 4 R1 VX4 +•L A h . r ts+\ 4 i r-— �y� •: ., '.1' ! -ti , ti r •♦_ • u %• • t4 N • • _ • •‘ .'_ '' •N ' -. 4 N N - •w ' ., ,. -.\ u . \ a ) .' , .. I •.l 0 __ ♦ly+ S T -- :t 'AA\ /♦� n.. ... � • a. ♦'PM N',S�rti'ig41•r� v' r"' •ji�y. ' PO 4'7:.' � ` �l` • ' 3\ - Y r r Y t . ¢ . 3 •'►. •1 r r ..: 4 ,1 t .,,r ; , A ' . .. l •• 4+�' • f-t -,,.4-...4111::,,,, at,w4Q'/1... ,T• ro .. • n.SaT.e._i. ., r4: A.:.• • _ •.tom♦• `tMDYt'MMrui`•'`�".. i....r.u•M.y w Sumnary of Soil characteristics for Sludge Application Sites, Site !: Legal Description: 76N , ✓2 62W , SEC• rS Soil Series Soil Textures Slope Depth to Water Depth to Bedrock p r S b Hle tv 7o- VALENr. Seri grpriao 3Tot SEC ar7#'9ctie() - 2O 7Z- uNA Dro3 it LI 6.0 ^ 2O 79-VoN4 t` ti Ssn `l t • at 4.0 — 2O 76 _VONAt °' " Ir 2 ` " 2.0 - 6.o NAME JACK WELLS T6N R63W Analyzed by; TRIPLE "S" LAB, WC. SUBMITTED BY LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT P. 0. BOX 888 LONGMONT CO 80501 At Johnson's Corner On Interstate 25 LAB NO. 123128. 01 FILE NO. 14345. 01 Loveland, Colorado 80537 Box 678 Phone 303-667-5671 SAMPLE NO. 3 FIELD SE O 'ACRES UNIT SEC '13 FOUND IN SOIL (LBS/A 6 IN) : INFORMATION FROM DATA SHEET 7. 6 pH : GRASS INTENDED CROP NIL SOLUBLE SALTS (7.) : 4 TONS YIELD GOAL • 1 ALKALINITY INDEX NONE MANURE 1 . 1 ORGANIC MATTER (%) NONE RESIDUE VALUE 47 ORGANIC NITROGEN : SUGGESTED APPLICATION (LBS/ACRE) NIL NITRATE NITROGEN 100 TOTAL NITROGEN 104 med •AVAILABLE 'PHOSPHATE NONE ACTUAL PHOSPHATE 430 hi AVAILABLE POTASH NONE ACTUAL POTASH 1. 5 low SULFATE SULFUR : 30 ACTUAL SULFUR (SULFATE) 0. 02 low ZINC : 10 ACTUAL ZINC * ? � 12. 9 hi MANGANESE : NONE ACTUAL MANGANESE •• 1. 7 med COPPER : NCNE ACTUAL COPPER „l_.. 0. 8 low BORON -0. 5 ACTUAL BORON 7. 2 hi IRON NONE ACTUAL IRON 260 med MAGNESIUM NONE ACTUAL MAGNESIUM • 2300 med CALCIUM : NONE GYPSUM 40 low SODIUM : NONE ELEMENTAL SULFUR 20 CHLORINE * THESE RATES BASED ON THE MORE SOLUBLE INORGANIC FORMS SUCH AS SULFATES. SUGGESTED METHOD OF APPLICATION: TOPDRESS IF ESTABLISHED, PLOWDOWN IF SEEDING. COMMENTS; THE ABOVE AMOUNTS ARE FOR BROADCAST. FERTILIZER NOT IN THE ROOT ZONE IS OF NO-„VALUE TO,?.THE CROP CONSULT";4YOVR;:_FERTILIZER SUPPLIER,.OR LABORATORY •• • SOIL=TESTS ol,RE AHAlIS FOR OOOD JUDGEMENT. NOT:A SUBSTITUTE '' w.�a.e...rm.�.�n -..r4.. .�...•w._..o. A.•!_..at.1 ....+.-. �w.l.R.....,s. .w "tc•4, wi�f3.e N.. NAME JACK WELLS T6N R63W analyses by: j TRIPLE "S" LAB, INC. SUBMITTED BY LIOUID WASTE MANAGEMENT i"+ P. 0. BOX 889 LONGMONT CO 80301 At Johnson's Corner On Interstate 25 LAB NO. 125128. 01 PILE NO. 14543. 01 Loveland, Colorado 80537 Box 678 Phone 303-667-5671 SAMPLE NO, 3 SAMPLE: SE 0 SEC 15 GRASS TO VALUES AS PERCENT UNLESS NOTED AS IS DRY MATTER COPPER ppm 7, 7 ZINC ppm 9, 8 CADMIUM ppm " ._. _.." _....... _.. .0.17 LEAD ppm 11. 67 NICKEL ppm 3. 77 pH 7. 6 AMMONIA NITROGEN (ppm) 3 NITRATE NITROGEN (ppm) NIL TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (ppm) 210 CCNDVCTIVITY (ymhos/cm) 160 AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS (ppm) 23 • • .-. • • • . • ~ - .._ _ . .-....:,.•).morn L, +�.r>..e..+a.wn' e.cteLLN+u.eKr- • lb .e✓ a ..� n),AlY! giett. �§wlsW ,4. ..° a. ••,410:o, � 1 .�� ter. '4— ..zi Y' n4-�.tuiV7�41n.."4: J:3Wa ' YbML'QRL+a+�,al r..Rw > NAME JACK WELLS T6N R63W Analyzed by: TRIPLE "S" LAB, INC. SUBMITTED BY LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT + P. 0. BOX 888 LONGMONT CO 80501 At Johnson's Corner On Interstate 25 LAB NO. 125128. 01 FILE NO. 14545, 01 Loveland, Colorado 80637 Box 678 Phone 303-6674672 SAMPLE NO. 3 FIELD NO. SE Q " ACRES UNIT SOIL TEXTURE SAND . 87. 2 SILT Y. 4. 0 CLAY % 8. 8 CLASSIFICATION: SANDY LOAM ORGANIC MATTER 7. 1. 2 s� ,,,. ..},yr.'t, °y:g1 t p a� n, J1�`RtG,,%T i 'f it; Y ',«rte... ` . ESTIMATED CEC'+�"lt�: :. ,',"`7. 9 MEIi%2OO CM c thirtrjial r ,.... .:.w..;J,'_..=ti.....C:.��:J}+,.Y:.nc-..✓i;.+.tmA.�,..+vrU-.'..w....,.:.fn A e,...vi++...i .,.Yi. . ; at`+."4t71^E��.s ar`r'`� l 4 it 'lfr''n+ �C �` t** r.- +� a, ata4^' . .+..n w.a,. ..N:tM IUiL{w'rstC'w C4,;: .'�.m,6i.Yi S/Att., ...r t +.�M.t�.�.',v¢ �q�0il'e'�J'ia.'tc+tY_,+Awvh.:..w5.��'.4;rw++�a'Cc4. .tn'+at^,"""R,@4�+C+cF�`.�YMen �..y.,. . is JACK WELLST6N R63W A y4 byTRIPLE "S" LAB, INC. VAME UBMITTED BY LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT P. 0. BOX 888 LONGMONT CO 00501 At JoluDson's Corner On Interstate 25 LAB NO. 125128. 02 FILE NO. 14545. 01 Loveland, Colorado 80537 Box 678 Phone 303-667-5671 SAMPLE NC. FIELD NW 0 ACRES UNIT SEC 13 FOUND IN SOIL (LBS/A 6 IN) INFORMATION FROM DATA SHEET 7. 6 pH GRASS INTENDED CROP NIL SOLUBLE SALTS (Vs) 4 TONS YIELD GOAL 1 ALKALINITY INDEX : NONE MANURE 0. 9 ORGANIC MATTER (Y.) NONE RESIDUE VALUE 4.0 ORGANIC NITROGEN ; SUGGESTED APPLICATION (LDS/ACRE) NIL NITRATE NITROGEN : 110 TOTAL NITROGEN 11 ._. 'Y r-7 'l'1';° f T'ar- 77m r :r`r"- ,,,H_ h�p.f , 53 low AVAILABLE PHOSPHATE ' l r 40 ' .ACTUAL PHOSPHATE 350 mid AVAILABLE POTASH NONE ACTUAL POTASH , 23 mid SULFATE SULFUR i. , ; .50, _, , ACTUAL SULFUR (SULFATE) 4 0. 02 low ZINC ; 10 ACTUAL ZINC * 20. 6 hi MANGANESE NONE ACTUAL MANGANESE 1. 6 med COPPER ; 0. 5 ACTUAL COPPER * 0. 6 low BORON ; 0. 5 ACTUAL BORON S 6. 1 h'_ IRO1 NONE ACTUAL IRON 360 h3 MAGNESIUM : NONE ACTUAL MAGNESIUM 3100 med CALCIUM NONE GYPSUM. 60 1cu! SODIUM ; NONE ELEMENTAL SULFUR 20 CHLORINE . * THESE RATES BASED ON THE MORE SOLUBLE INORGANIC FORMS SUCH AS SULFATES. . SUGGESTED METHOD OF APPLICATION: TOPDRESS IF ESTABLISHED, PLOWDOWN ,'" IF SEEDING. \ COMMENTS: a - • .. •,•,?c.:'_ 7NE ABOVE AMOUNTS ARE FOR BROADCAST. FERTILIZER NOT IN THE ROOT ZONE IS OF ,'"'VALVE TO THE CROP: CONSULT:',YOUR' FERTILIZER SUPPLIER OR LABORATORY " ' IL' TESTS ARE A BASIS FOR GOOD .IUDGEMENT:- NOT A 'SUBSTITUTE. .ac, r Ar•E JACK WELLS T6N R63W Analyzed by: TRIPLE "S" LAB, INC. SUBMITTED SY LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT P• 0. BOX BES LONGMONT CO 80501 At Johnson's Corner On Interstate 25 ♦ LAD NO• 125128. 02 FILE NO. 14545. 01 Loveland, Colorado 80537 Box 678 Phone 303467-5671 SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE: SOIL NW 0-SEC 15 ♦ VALUES AS PERCENT UNLESS NOTED ; ..'•, AS IS .'DRY MATTER COPPER ppm 7. 3 ZINC ppm 0. 2 CADMIUM♦ fro 0. 1C LEAD ppm 13. 43 NICKEL ppm 4. 12 pH 7. 6 • AMMONIA NITROGEN (ppm) 4 NITRATE NITROGEN (ppm) NIL TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (ppm) 140 CONDUCTIVITY (oimhoa/cn) 180 AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS (ppm) 12 • • is '�'< < �i� 7 q 'h"fr•w s'V}.ehld:_p '".� f ^ •'A. ♦ • • • • • ......_ ... .1 • '.::. ... '�. .•J�.Ah•.t.�L�.�i�iL.�w +y•.J.. ... r••t.:¢�"w:r, F A .w ., • . }1S F • A„,a,sr �Y r 911 f I -Y�AI/Xh!` '.� n- _t xi(''a $. ,+, r 0�t•p . - v.YM..noM•+Jbw•vnwr..�-.e�rrw+� - .+.+.n V -S - r, .•. DATE APRIL 19. 2989 E JACK WELLS T6N R63W Analyzed by: P TRIPLE "8" LAB, INC. SUBMITTED BY LIGUID WASTE MANAGEMENT ,.o P. O. BOX 888 LONGMONT CO 8O5O1 At Johnson's Corner On Interstate 25 LAB NO. 125128. 02 FILE NO. 14545, O1 Loveland, Colorado 80537 .//...,r.( Box 678 Phone 303-667-5671 • SAMPLE NO. FIELD _NO. ”NW_G 2nd+ACRES --_UNIT • SOIL TEXTURE'_ _. �.. • SAND % 78. 0 SILT 7. 5. 6 • CLAY 7. 16. 4 • CLASSIFICATION: SANDY LOAM ORGANIC MATTER 'h 0. 9 n - r•v -dT:e GY^ r.,r.�.reew.gy��nru; .v T• '` �,y ,+• + w :.a ♦ ... ESTIMATED CEC _ 12. 0 MEG/1OO • . • _.. .,.. .v ..... ... . . ... . ..... ti.... . . +. .. . .. .Fvw4C M1. iu LJA:.ixw9�.a.a'Ga... s.J;.r.+...a-n l -.. ._ • • • • Selh44.x'?Va.Srin-* 1a1.Sri- .1 7a W crltM18.}:.r..l.:i:....x'sw.v..:.;......., iy+da..vi Fyl;...�.�r��..a+w.. • • • rre is .��` . �,_�.+,,' �hw ar� no ia.-+ ,,., ..^'�'wernvvn..+-.C-w'wwt r 4, fi.....�.• .....•r.n.ror r pLlR:it.wyrd..v..a-.. ..+ .1ar..wq r v..S.vt+`.. t ;yv.. ' 'Af9MgwcesMr.ri�ryp ,v1 Jk`:Kiii-CV,.�£t e{K4 r.tir ••.u•r." �7♦�i]!.Yc+r�, . +vtti,:a ■ i • i" MINUTES1739j;,7 _�, " 4:1 WELD COUNTY COUNCIL -• April 5, 1989 Tape 3/89 The Weld County Council met in regular session in full conformity with the Weld County Home Rule Charter at 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado on Wednesday, April 5, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL The following members were present in person: President Norman Carlson, Vice President Doris W. Williams, Councilman Marion Richter, Councilman Frank Stewart and Councilman Harold Fahrenbruch. Also present for the meeting was Tom David, Dr. Kurtz, two reporters, several students and the Council Secretary. MINUTES: Councilman Fahrenbruch moved to approve the minutes for the March 1 meeting. Councilwoman Williams seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE: President Carlson made note of the correspondence received. He specificially noted the memo from Don Warden regarding the salary impact on 5% limitation/mill levy. APPOINTMENTS: Council members Carlson, Stewart and Williams volunteered to attend the elected officials meeting of 4/10/89. REPORTS: President Carlson advised that he had attended the elected officials meeting on March 13. His report consisted of the current investigations and reviews of the Home Rule Charter and Elected Officials salary issue ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: Councilman Richter suggested reviewing the County's involvement in the furthering of education of county employees. Councilman Richter moved to invite Pat Persichino, Personnel Director, to attend the next council meeting, May 3, to clarify the education benefits for county employees. Councilman Stewart seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: President Carlson suggested the following sections be revised in reviewing Articles I through V. County Attorney Tom David was present to assist the Council. Section 3-7 (1 ): Clerk to the Board - Change supervision of Clerk to the Board from control under the Clerk and Recorder to the Commissioners. Mr. David: Advised that having supervision of the office under the control of the Clerk and Recorder was done primarily for smaller counties where Commissioners met only once a month. The Council discussed the feasibility and advantages/ disadvantages of switching the supervision. Section 3-8 (1)(R): Regarding municipal conferences called by Commissioners. Change from required three times each year to either once or not less than two times a year. Section 3-9 (3) ; Dealing with salary of Commissioners ($10,000 and $15,000). Eliminate the entire paragraph because the salaries pertain to the year 1986. There should have been an automatic repeal after that year. Mr. David advised the Council that usually items that have no controversy are placed in one package for the voters to vote on and not place it with other items that have substantive changes. Page 2 County Council Minutes April 5, 1989 OLD BUSINESS CONTINUED: Section 4-2 (B)(2)(f): Regarding employees seeking election to a partisan public office, take a leave of absense without pay. Delete the without pay. President Carlson suggested this change, because it presents a financial hardship for the employee for eight to nine months. The Council discussed how approval would be given to an employee and the time limits that would have to be employed. Section 4-5: Regarding the section on Engineering Services. Add a paragraph regarding the Road & Bridge Advisory committee. Section 5-2: Regarding the Qualifications. Change "for" the State of Colorado to "in" the State of Colorado. Mr. David adivsed that he felt the section was stating that the County Attorney had to have five years of experience, minimum and that the five years had to be through admission of the Colorado Bar's as opposed to other states. Councilwoman Williams had the following changes: Section 4-4 (B) : Regarding Board of Adjustment duties and functions as provided by law. She questioned what those duties and functions were. Councilman Stewart had the following changes: Section 4-4 (A)(2)(C): Regarding activities between Board of Adjustment and Planning Commission. Felt that clarification on role of staff in assisting the two boards was needed. Councilman Fahrenbruch had the following changes: Section 4-2 (B)(2)(f) : Elected officials exempt from taking leave of absense without pay while seeking re-election to public office. Conflict with Section 13-7(2) : County Council members have to resign from office if running for another elected public office. In one section the Council is an elected official and in another it is not. These two sections need clarification. Councilman Fahrenbruch moved that the Council review the next five articles, six through ten. Councilwoman Williams seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. SALARY DISCUSSION The Council discussed the form provided by Dick Keirnes regarding the salaries of Assessors, Clerks and Treasuers under HB 1021 as amended in the Senate. The Council also discussed the salaries being given for the Undersheriff and Chief Deputies. Councilman Fahrenbruch made a motion to set the salaries for Weld County elected officials at the same salary for the other four categories in category II of HS 1021 , once final decision is made by the state legislature. The motion died for a lack of a second. It was discussed that more figures were needed before making a decision. It was also suggested to wait until the legislature makes a final decision regarding HB 1021 before making a decision. NEW BUSINESS The Council secretary advised that supplies and print requisitions are now automated with the County's computer system. This presents a problem since the County Council office does not have a computer for direct use. Any requisitions for this office have to be done through the Purchasing Department. The benefits for having a computer system would be beneficial for the office. Councilwoman Williams moved to approach the Commissioners u I I Page 3 County Council Minutes April 5, 1989 NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED: for a computer system for the County Council office. Councilman Stewart seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. The discussion regarding outside meetings was tabled until the next Council meeting. PAYMENT OF BILLS: Councilman Stewart moved to approve payment of the March bills. Councilman Fahrenbruch seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS Dr. Dwaine Kurtz suggested asking other elected officials to comment on the Home Rule Charter, specifically the sections dealing with their office. Councilwoman Williams moved to send a memo to the elected officials that we would be reviewing at the next meeting, asking for suggestions or changes to the Home Rule Charter either in person or in writing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Richter and it passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. The time of adjournment was 8:55 p.m. , on April 5, 1989. Ltd' Norman Carlson, President 'Lo0 Ann Goodwin-Rossler, Secretary Date /proved • 1739 ti Y -g 1,1 g. 31 TO I1-2 ED1T,D BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 6191 and 10600 STIPULATION AND OkDER MORNING FRESH FARM, INC. , Petitioner, and WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Respondent. The parties hereto Stipulate that the hearing in the foregoing case is applicable to 1987 and 1988 tax years. The basis for this Stipulation is that the items of personal property and all legal issues are identical for the two tax years. Counsel for Petitioner and Respondent each understood that the hearing was for 1987 and 1988. Subsequent to the board's decision, counsel was advised that that hearing was for 1987 only. By stipulation of the parties and approval by the Board of Assessment Appeals, this proceeding is deemed to include both 1987 and 1988 tax years so as to allow the identical facts and issues to be appealed without duplicity. WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as stated above and request approval of this Stipulation by the Board of Assessment Appeals. Respectfully submitted this / Cif day of tt , 1989. STIENTJES AND SHADDOCK WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ATTORNEYS/ FOR PETITIONER By�'�S�\I \ ' grfBy---- fly Harlan C. Stient 'es, #25 Thomae 0. David, #4601 1025 9th Ave. , Suite 30 Weld County Attorney Greeley, CO 80631-404 915 10th Street (303 ) 353-9000 Greeley, CO 80631 (303) 356-4000, ext. 4391 Attorneys for Respondent vr1X, /' 0 ' BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLORADO Docket Number 6191 and 10600 STIPULATION AND ORDER PAGE 2 ORDER The foregoing Stipulation is hereby approved by the Board of Assessment Appeals. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS --------,. / c-d /amees T. McDowell; Chairman /On, rit_.... Don—Clifton I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the decision of The Board of Assessment Appeals. 7,7,/,if r ; 6a-/Pt U I I .:7 ‘, —_ 4 CIS li V ...si:„ ic _I 17Or _4._...„:,c‘pd, \„ . " iiirint.,.....)ha„ City'o 30 �.fy cam, vy O — n o ^ TO: Greeley City Council I" ,1 tJ7 _ Weld County Commissioners os; Gr FROM: Stephen V. Hill,"l'lanning Administrator �' Z,-/;•—•-• Li V SUBJECT: Monfort Annexation Revision CD DATE: May 2, 1989 . Please be advised that in the Annexation Impact Report for the Monfort Lamb Plant that Section C under Environmental Features should read as follows: Floodplain - Approximately 50% of the property annexed is included within the 100 year floodplain. SVH/cs UNITED STATES CC, .. S") g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON,D.C.20555 17E9 -S . , 17 moo, April 27, 1989 TO ICE 6;.T3 Docket No. 50-267 Mr. D. D. Hock President and Chief Executive Officer Public Service Company of Colorado P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Dear Mr. Hock: SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF THE NRC OF EMPLOYEES' POTENTIAL SAFETY ISSUES The purpose of this letter is to reemphasize to licensees their responsibilities to assure that they, and their contractors and subcontractors permit their employees to contact, without restrictions, the NRC with concerns about potential safety issues. In particular. this letter notifies licensees that it is not acceptable to include in settlement agreements for discrimination matters arising under Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, or in any labor agreements or other agreement affecting compensation terms, conditions and privileges of employment, any restrictions on employees or former employees providing information to any members of the NRC including the staff, inspectors, investigators, Administrative Law Judges, Boards, or the Commission. Information Notice 84-08 (February 14, 1984) reminded licensees that the public health and safety requires that employees be free tc raise safety issues to licensee management and to the NRC. Failure to permit employees to do so violates 10 CFR 50.7 regarding "Employee Protection" and may subject licensees to significant enforcement action by the NRC. In addition to NRC action, employees who have been discriminated against for raising safety issues have the right to file complaints with the Department of Labor pursuant to Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, for the purpose of remedying the harm caused by the discrimination. Following the filing of a complaint, the Department of Labor performs an investigation. If either the employee or the employer is not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation, a hearing can be held before an Administrative Law Judge with review by the Secretary of Labor. In many cases, the employee and the employer reach settlement of the issues raised in the DOL proceeding before completion of the formal process and a finding by the Secretary of Labor. NRC supports settlements as they provide remedies to employees without the need for litigation. Settlement agreements in Section 210 proceedings are matters within the jurisdiction of the Department of Labor. Licensees and their contractors must not include clauses in these settlements which in any way restrict the ability of employees to provide Mr. D. D. Hock - 2 - April 27, 1989 ir,farriation about potential safety issues to NRC. Examples of restrictive clauses include but are not limited to prohibiting or in any way limiting an employee, or an attorney for such employee, from coming to and providing safety information to an NRC staff member. Licensees should examine their current and previous agreements to assure that restrictive clauses are not present. If restrictive clauses are found, licensees should promptly inform the employee or former employee that the restriction should be disregarded, that he or she may freely come to NRC at any time without fear of any form of retribution, and that such a restriction will not be enforced. Please notify us no later than July 31, 1989 if any such restrictive clauses have been identified. Your response should be provided to your licensing contact in headquarters. This request for information was approved by the Office of Management and Budget under clearance number 3150-0011 which expires December 31, 1989. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Reports Managener,t Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503. Questions concerning this letter should be directed to the Director of the Office of Enforcement. Sincerely, V for St o, Jr Executive Director for Operations cc: See next page Mr. 0. D. Hock Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain cc: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Albert J. Hazle, Director Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Control Division Public Service Company Department of Health of Colorado 4210 East 11th Avenue P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80220 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Mr. David Alberstein, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Fort St. Vrain Services Manager, Nuclear Production GA International Services Corporation and Station Manager Post Office Box 85608 Public Service Company of Colorado San Diego, California 92138 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Resource Mr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Management Division Quality Assurance Division Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. 0. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. D. D. Hock U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission President and Chief Executive Officer P. 0. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Commitment Control Program Public Service Company Building Coordinator Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-0 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80211 Regional Administrator, Region IV Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Public Service Company of Colorado Arlington, Texas 76011 P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 ul:i , L - 1 PAYEOIL FUND CLAIMS WARRANT P.O. & ro. V0. NO. VENDOR ' AMOUNT 14311 083815 UNITED BANK OF GREELEY 2,756.16 14312 083817 UNrra, BANK OF GREELEY- 367,784.86 14313 083818 COLORADO DEPAKPMFNT OF REVENUE 50,287.48 I State of Colorado ) TOTAL 420,828.50 ss County of Weld ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through 1 and dated MAY 8th , 198 9 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 420,R2R_sn Dated this 8th day of MAY (1619, /Weld Su� an r� r Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th_ day of MAY , 198 9 My com li sion expires: m commission gv..1,-- I -.s loon . / /{Icf,-, a. -- - A /, Notary Public State of Colorado ) ) ss County of Weld ) - We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the PAYROLL Fund totaling S 420,828.50 . Chairperson f/ 109 /n� Member .. .,nty Ci rk and Record Member "sic :e u� L Member, 0v RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MAY 8, 1989 TAPE #89-18 & #89-19 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, May 8, 1989, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene R. Brantner - Arrived later Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Weld County Attorney, Thomas 0. David Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of May 3, 1989, as printed. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: There were no additions to today's agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: Commissioner Lacy, reporting on the Engineering Department, said that the roads which have been graveled this year total approximately 171 miles, and approximately 4,800 tons of gravel have been hauled. Commissioner Lacy also reported on the dozers and scrapers. He said repair work on three bridges has been completed, and the crews are working on four others. Commissioner Lacy said culvert installations have been completed on various County Roads. ■ WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $213,887.78 Social Services 28,026,00 Handwritten warrants: Payroll 420,828.50 Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. i F'U',090/ i I Let the record reflect that Commissioner Brantner is now present. BIDS: APPROVE 3/4 TON PICKUP - HEALTH DEPARTMENT: Mr. Warden said this item was presented on May 3, but in order to get the fleet price, it is requested that it be considered on an emergency basis today. He said the recommendation is to accept the low hid submitted by Trans-West, Inc., of Commerce City, in the total amount of $13,018.00. Commissioner Lacy moved to accept the recommendation in total and approve this purchase on an emergency basis. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. BUSINESS: OLD: CONSIDER PY '89 JOB SERVICE CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Commissioner Johnson moved to continue this matter to May 15. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. NEW: CONSIDER RENEWAL REQUEST FOR RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE FROM RONALD FAHRENHOLTZ, DBA C J'S LIQUORS: Lt. Kim Fliethman, representing the Sheriff's Department, said there have been no violations at this establishment during the past year. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the renewal of the Retail Liquor Store License for Ronald Fehrenholtz, dba C J's Liquors. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Johnson, carried unanimously. CONSIDER 1989 PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN MIGRANT HEAD START AND SAN LUIS VALLEY BOARD OF COOPERATIVE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Jeannie Tacker, representing the Department of Human Resources, said this Agreement will allow the San Luis Valley Board of Cooperative Services to provide services to 50 migrant children in the San Luis Valley. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve said Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IN S34 AND S35, T6N, R66W AND TWO DEEDS: Tom David, County Attorney, said this property is located west of 35th Avenue. He said the proposed deeds concern the vacation of an 80-foot strip of land and also the internal 1889 right-of-way roads which are contained in this tract of land. Mr. David said it is recommended by the Road and Bridge Department that this request be approved. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve said vacation of right-of-way and the two Deeds. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Brantner, carried unanimously. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JESSE VIGIL AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. David explained that this Agreement is for process services for the Department of Social Services. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Agreement with Jesse Vigil and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson, the motion carried unanimously. Minutes - May 8, 1989 Page 2 CONSIDER COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACT WITH CITY OF EVANS AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Donn Ruby, Director of Information Services, explained this Contract for consulting services. He said the City of Evans will designate a data processing coordinator and designate in which areas the County is to utilize the contracted time. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Contract and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER CORRECTED QUIT CLAIM DEED RE: RUTH PLACE AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Mr. David said this concerns certain property located in Wattenburg. He said when this property was originally vacated in 1980, this certain portion was inadvertently left off the Deed. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Corrected Quit Claim Deed and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CANCEL UNCOLLECTIBLE AMBULANCE ACCOUNTS: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve this Resolution concerning the uncollectible Ambulance accounts. Seconded by Commissioner Lacy, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 46 BETWEEN WCR 55 AND 57: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Resolution which concerns the temporary closure of Weld County Road 46 between Weld County Roads 55 and 57. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY BOARD: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve this Resolution concerning the appointment of Carol Kobel and Steven Modrell to the Communications Advisory Board. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 118-I, IN MATTER OF AMENDING AND DELETING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCES NUMBERS 118-G AND 118-H, WELD COUNTY PERSONNEL POLICY HANDBOOK, AS AMENDED: Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, read this Ordinance into the record. (Tape Change 1'89-19 during reading.) There was no public comment offered at this time. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 118-I and direct the Clerk to the Board to have published forthwith. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson, the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS - O.F.T. , INC.; GRIMES: GOLDEN BUCKEYE PETROLEUM; AND NUNEZ: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Harold and Neva Crimes; Golden Buckeye Petroleum; Aurelio Nunez; and O.F.T., Inc. , for Building Code and Zoning violations. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, and it carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. Ordinance No. 118-I was heard on first reading at today's meeting. Minutes - May 8, 1989 Page 3 I Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions - were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:35 A.M. `7270,3,0,„46.44,;‘) APPROVED: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COKMISSTONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder 4 and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Cha an EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL Deputy County C eiL Ja line Johnson, Pro-Tem dl S Gene R. Brantner George Kenne Gordbit tFly.. /' Lv r Minutes - May 8, 1989 Page 4 W . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Wednesday, May 10, 1989 Tape #89-19 ROLL CALL: C.W. Kirby, Chairman Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner George Kennedy Cordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of May 8, 1989 ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: New Business #6 - Consider authorization for Chairman to sign Economic Development Grant concerning Ft. Lupton Fish Canning Company APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: DEPARTMENT HEADS AND 1) Mike Loustalet. Treasurer ELECTED OFFICIALS: 2) Gary McCabe, Ambulance Director COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BIDS: 1) Approve mid-size copier - Print Shop (cont. to May 31) BUSINESS: NEW: 1) Consider Agreement with Cloverleaf Kennel Club and authorize Chairman to sign 2) Consider request for renewal of Tavern Liquor License, with changes. from Valley Hayloft, Inc. 3) Consider Petition for Tax Abatement from Mike Sage, Inc. 4) Consider Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Vacant Land for Rights-of-Way and/or Easements with William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham and authorize Chairman to sign 5) Consider Internal Improvements Agreement re: Beebe Draw PUD PLANNING: 1) ZPMH #1548 - Martinez 2) Probable Cause Hearing - Ralph Nix Produce, Inc. (cont. from 2/6/89) 3) Consider Authorization for Demolition of Dangerous Building - Gill Lion's Club (cont. from 3/1/89) 4) Consider Resolution re: Building Code and Zoning Violations - Monfort of Colorado; Reed; Trader, Incorporated: and Bunting CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: May 10 - Work Session 1 :30 PM May 11 - Area Agency on Aging 9:00 AM May 11 - Budget Work Session 9:00 AM May 11 - Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee 10:00 AM May 12 - Community Corrections Board 12:00 NOON May 15 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 16 - E-911 Board 12:00 NOON May 16 - Planning Commission 1 :30 PM May 16 - Retirement Board 2:15 PM May 16 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM May 18 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON May 29 - HOLIDAY HEARINGS: May 10 - Show Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal. Inc. (cont. from 3/22/89) I0:00 AM May 10 - Tavern Liquor License, Henry L. Walker, dba Bears Sports Saloon 10:00 AM May 17 - Special Review Permit, Open-pit mine and materials processing facility. C S M Companies (Distel Farm Resources) 10:00 AM May 24 - Preliminary Hearing, Casa Grande/Enchanted Hills Local Improvement District 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendment to USR #726, Vacate Development Standard #4, Ralph Nix Produce, Incorporated 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 10:00 AM Jun 5 - Show Cause Hearing, Tatum (Cont. from 11/7/88) 9:00 AM COMMUNICATIONS: 1) State Dept. of Natural Resources re: Colorado Mining Lease No. UR 3110 2) Henrylyn Irrigation District - Inclusion and Exclusion Orders 3) State Dept. of Health agenda for May 17, 1989. and Notices of Hearings 4) Town of Hudson re: Processing Services of Bluhill American Foods PLANNING STAFF 1) RE #1169 - Hamilton APPROVALS: 2) SE #364 - Conway, et al RESOLUTIONS: 1) Approve Collateral and Plowing Permit #89-2 for Delwyn Northup * 2) Approve Vacation of Right-of-Way in S34 and S35, T6N, R66W and two Deeds * 3) Approve Purchase of Services Agreement with Jesse Vigil * 4) Approve Computer Services Contract with City of Evans * 5) Approve Corrected Quit Claim Deed re: Ruth Place * 6) Approve authorization for County Attorney to proceed with legal action - Building Code and Zoning Violations * 7) Approve Petition for Tax Abatement from Mike Sage, Inc. * Signed at this meeting Wednesday, May 10, 1989 i i. A RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE VACATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN DEEDS FOR COWAN CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, Cowan Concrete Products , Inc. , has requested the Board to vacate certain rights-of-way located in Sections 34 and 35 , Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve the vacation of said rights-of-way and approve Bargain and Sale Deeds conveying such to Cowan Concrete Products, Inc. , and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the vacation of certain rights-of-way in Sections 34 and 35 , Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign the Bargain and Sale Deeds conveying said rights-of-way to Cowan Concrete Products, Inc. The above and foregoing Resolution was , on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989. ‘771B0ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Jerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C. . Kirby, C airman / EXCUS$D DATE OF SIGNING - AYE Y: Jac j ine Johnson, Pro-Tem D putt' County erk A APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Br ntner George Kv4T --74; 4_,. County Attorney Ffr . f l Gard 'L°'. -Lack `` 890402 k -_- ;') 7- BARGAIN AND SALE DEED ri O - o :)•N O THIS BARGAIN AND SALE DEED is issued this 8th day of - May , 1989. o Weld County, Colorado, whose address is P. O. Box 1948, 0 Greeley, Colorado 80632, for the consideration of Ten o x Dollars ($10) , in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to a Cowan Concrete Products, Inc. , a Colorado corporation, whose • address is 625 Third Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631, the following real property in the County of Weld and State of • Colorado, to wit: VD CC c A strip of land thirty (30) feet in width along the South side of the North line and thirty (30) feet m on each side of the West line of Section 35, _ co 0 Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. , situate within the following described boundaries, \w with all its appurtenances : 0 0 Commencing at the Northeast corner (NE Cor) of Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of said Section 35 and N considering the East line of said Northeast quarter a w (NE 1/4) to bear S 00°00'00" with all bearings r- z therein relative thereto: N a - r Thence S 00°00'00" E, 513.13/to the Southeast P, CC corner (SE Cor) of a parcel of land described in Book 847, Reception #1769344 of Weld County Records; N M N Thence along a South line of said parcel N 69°24' 50" W. 53.41 ' to a point on the West right- m w of-way line of Weld County Road 35 as recorded in - Book 852, Reception #1773926 also being the true - point of beginning; Thence along said West right-of-way line S 00°00 '00" W, 2387.68' ; Thence N 87°57 '44" E, 20.02/ to a point on the West right-of-way of Weld County Road 35: Thence along said West right-of-way $ 00°00 '04" W, 804.64' to a point on the North right-of-way of the - Colorado and Southern Railway; 890402 - PJ J eocED COPY Thence along said North right-of-way line N 73°53 '43" W, 7019.20' to a point on the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter (SE 1/4, NE 1/4) of said Section 34; Thence along said West line of Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter (SE 1/4, NE 1/4) of Section 34 N 00°22 '53" 'W, 293.28' to the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter (SE 1/4, NE 1/4) of said Section 34; Thence N 89°41 '53" E, 1323. 38' to the Northeast corner of said Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter (SE 1/4, NE 1/4) of Section 34; Thence along the West line of the Northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of said Section 35 N 00°20'14" W, 1113.20 ' to a point on the South line of a parcel of land described in Book 891, Reception #1813358 of the Weld County Records; Thence along the boundary of said parcel by the following nine (9) courses : 1 - S 86°15 '20" E, 156.61 ' 2 - S 70°50 '33" E, 76.10 ' 3 - S 60°53 '33" E, 159 .61 ' 4 - S 60°53 '33" E, 35.17 ' 5 - S 69°59 '33" E, 87.55 ' 6 - N 69°02 '07" E, 368.11 ' 7 - N 88°47 '27" E, 39.57 ' 8 - N 74°33 ' 27" E, 169.68' 9 - N 02°14'57" E, 232.07 ' to a point on the North line of said Section 35; Thence along said North line of Section 35 N 89°25 ' 27" E, 2458.79' to the Northwest corner (NW cor) of a parcel of land described in Book 847, Reception #1769344 of the Weld County Records; Thence along the boundary of said parcel by the following three (3) courses : 1 - S 73°37 '07" E, 431.59' 2 - S 86°27 '15" E, 672.24' 3 - S 69°24' 50" E, 885.39' to the true point of beginning. -2- 890402 r Sig ed this. 8th day of May , 1989. ATTEST: 2ti�t/ „J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County 7erk and Recorder and Clerk to ,,// the Board Q.,ifi�W , APPROVED AS TO FORM: r'// Y G County Attorney 7 -3- 890432 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED THIS BARGAIN AND SALE DEED is issued this 8th day of May , 1989. � o OU Weld County, Colorado, whose address is P.O. Box 1948. Greeley, O Colorado 80632, for the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10), in hand paid, • hereby sells and conveys to Cowan Concrete Products, Inc. , a Colorado • corporation, whose address is 625 Third Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631, o the following real property in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to wit: o yr e.4 A strip of land eighty (80) feet in width lying immediately o North parallel and adjacent to the right of way of Colorado and Southern Railway Company commencing at a point where `^ a said right of way intersects the East line of the Southeast quarter of Section Thirty-five (35) Township Six (6) North, of Range Sixty-six (66) West of the Sixth P.M., in Weld County, Colorado, running thence Northwesterly to the West o, line of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter co (SE1/4 NE1/4) of Section Thirty-four (34) Township Six (6) w North, of Range Sixty-six (66) West of the Sixth P.M. , tel in Weld County, Colorado, with all its appurtenances. 0 C CC Si ed this 8th day of May , 1989. M C.L. ATTEST: AA34.1 ,44 "" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS z WELD COUNTY, COLORADO N Weld County Clerk and o Recorder and Clerk to 1/12/4/ !� the Board 1� 1'`/ m x N N • _ M.O. By: • in H O CC W APPROVED TO FORM: County Attorney S90402 F PURPORTED COPY' V. P 104 454 761 it(LtPF F"OR CERTIFEED MAIL 512 Ak/ Shni4N i land 2 when asrvloes w desired, and eor tArA•ltann .. � Bd 4. Camara • RICHARD Q BUMP FPI Wrest to the'7tYou TOn Space on the reverse Fa2ure to do thh will prevent this CAPLAN AND EARNEST xri �Ior.ddidonelsoncIsinguptad an ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1: Stwwtowhom end addressee•address. 2. 0 RastictedDeaysq 2595 CANYON BLVD., SUITE 400 0°r 1 r ) BOULDER, CO 80302-V03 3� Article Ad*Masd to: 4. Article Number RICHARD B. BUMP 9s4.. 710iT ofSeMa. - �� CAPLAN AND EARNEST L Repaired n erred r 1,ei F Eue ATTORNEYS AT LAW ®cringe ❑COD 2595 CANYON BLVD., SUITE 400 U EPIISuMua ❑Littroo a u<`-• , F.+, BOULDER, CO 80302-6703 flag,,obtain r nature of addressee de F r. f4 r� FEP - . - et agent and DATE D61V91ED. S. oyneture .Address -.. 8. Addressee's Address 07ArLY Y - ' X meted afire poi. ] r - in 1 6. L v 'b Ui Al s� I 7. •ate U 0 TOI'1L I.,5 y Ml F ., 5 Q�'t , C;dep Fweoa .Of Da.• ►S Form 3811,Me. 198E a LttO.P.O. 1858-212-865 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT LL 5/aaZ.1 SI M 6 DD W C PI N a a MEMORAIDUM tip t Wilk Clerk to the Board May 2, 1989 To I h Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer X COLORADO Fmm Vacate Right-of-Way, Sec. 34 & 35, T6N, R66W Subject Cowan Concrete Products, Inc. ABA Mobile Premix of Greeley, through their attorney, Richard Bump, is requesting vacation of rights-of-way in Sections 34 and 35, TbN, R66W. I have reviewed this request with the Commissioners in work session. Please place this item on the agenda, along with the "Bargain and Sale Deeds" attached. Mr. David is familiar with this project. He would be likely to sign the approval as to form. DLS/mw:mmp xc: Commissioner Lacy Mobile Premix File 89044:2 i J RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WELD COUNTY AND JESSE VIGIL CONCERNING OBTAINING LEGAL SERVICE OF PROCESS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Child Support Enforcement Unit of the Weld County Department of Social Services, in order to perform its function, requires that it contract with process servers to obtain legal service of process, and WHEREAS, an Agreement for said process services between Weld County and Jesse Vigil has been presented to the Board, and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions are as stated in said Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the Board, after study and review, deems it advisable to approve said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement between Weld County and Jesse Vigil for legal service of process be, and hereby is, approved. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: CktU1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.w. Kir yb , iairman EXCUaQF SIGNING - AYR z3y` J (ikcalt Ja eline Johnson, Pro-Tem I')eputy County ierk �} APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Bran ner aft �L X/ George Re n _ ,4 County Attorney 4� Gorcli n- ."' Lac yyy // /� / �// 890398 • Contract Number • (State Use Only) T---I Renewal of Agreement (Form CSE-5) I---I Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement (Form CSE-1) 1`I Purchase of Legal Services' Agreement (Form CSE-2) TVI Purchase of Services Agreement (Form CSE-3) COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES This agreement is executed as of , 19_ by. and between ,rrgce vivid (hereinafter Contractor) and the Weld County Department of Social Services (hereinafter "Department"): • • This agreement shall be in effect from , 19_, through , 19_, but not to exceed twelve (12) months. -- - - • - The Deoartmen_, under Part D of Title IV of the Social Security Act, 45 CER 232, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305. and 26-13-101, et. sec. . C.2-S_, as amended, has been delegated responsibility for the development and implementation of a program to secure support and establish paternity for any person(s) eligible for IV-D services within the meaning of Federal regulations, and The Department desires to enter into an agreement with the Contractor to: 1) assist the Department in providing the services necessary to establis paternity, establish support obligations, and secure support for any person(s) eligible for IV-D services within the meaning of Federal regulations, and 2). assist in other child support enforcement matters of common concern to the Department and the Contractor, and The Contractor desires to enter into sue= an agreement with the Department; The Department and Contractor therefore agree as follows: 890398 1. Scope of Services Services shall be provided to any person(s) eligible for IV-D services by the Contractor in compliance with Exhibit I entitled, Scope of Services, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference. 2. Personnel The Contractor shall identify all personnel by title who shall provide services pursuant to this Agreement in Exhibit II, entitled "Computation of Personnel Costs for Services", a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. The addition or deletion of personnel listed in Exhibit II of this agreement will be accomplished by a memorandum with an updated Exhibit II submitted by the Contractor, within ten (10) days of any changes of positions, to the Department and subject to approval of the Executive Director, Colorado Department of Social Services, or designee. The new • Exhibit II will comply with the requirements of this paragraph two. 3. Payment a. Payment shall be made on the basis of Exhibit III, entitled "Agreement Budget", a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference, for services provided pursuant to Exhibit I. The Agreement Budget shall establish the maximum reimbursement which shall be paid from combined county, State and Federal funds during the duration of this agreement. - . b. The Contractor shall submit itemized monthly billings to the .- Department for costs incurred pursuant to Exhibit I. of this agreement .- - in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Colorado Department of Social Services.4.. Billings shalt be submitted -on .Form. . — 5310.211, Statement of. Monthly. Amounts.Due for .Child Support--- Enforcement and Paternity Determination_ The Contractor shall submit . 7 all itemized monthly bill iags andHForm 5310.211 to the Department no later than the last day of the month following the month the cost was - - incurred. Billings, including the 5310.211, shall be signed by the Contractor unless a designee is so- identified in Exhibit IV, Special Provisions. Failure to submit the monthly billings and Form 5310.211 in accordance with the terms of this agreement shall result in the Contractor's forfeiture of all rights to be reimbursed for such expenses. 890398 c. Payment to the Contractor shall be made monthly by the Department upon receipt of such itemized billings as follows: (1) Personal Services Costs (Check Appropriate Box) /1 Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement, Form CSE-1 (District Attorney or County Attorney) Actual costs (wages or salaries and employee benefits) determined by multiplying the number of hours worked by the Attorney and his/her employees to provide services under this agreement by their actual hourly rates including employee benefits. -- / / Purchase of Legal Services Agreement, Form CSE-2 (Private Attorney) Reasonable costs defined as the number of hours worked by the Attorney multiplied by the hourly rate specified in Exhibit II, Personal Services. This hourly rate shall include all overhead charges and charges for the ancillary services of typists, secretaries, paralegals, and other personnel. / Purchase of Services Agreement, Form CSE-3 (non-legal services) Services costs determined by multiplying the rate developed in Exhibit Ii by the estimated number of hours oz estimated number of services to be provided. (2) Operating expenses - / / Cooperative Reimbursement Agreement,. Form CSE-1 ' (District Attorney or County Attorney — Determined by an allocation method distributing costs equitably to all activities of the Attorney's Office. Operating expenses include stolies, materials, equipment, printing, reproduction, rent, normal telephone charges, utilities, repairs and maintenance- (3) Travel Actual charges for travel related to providing services under this agreement must receive prior written approval by the Department in order to be reimbursed. Reimbursement for Contractor and staff time spent in traveling shall be negotiated between the Contractor and the Department and specified in Exhibit IV. Special Provisions. • 890398 (4) Training Actual charges for travel for reasonable and essential short term training for the Contractor and staff providing services under this agreement must receive prior written approval by the Department in order to be reimbursed. In the event such training . is made mandatory by the Department, such charges shall be reimbursed. Reimbursement for Contractor and staff time spent in training shall be negotiated between the Contractor and the Department and specified in Exhibit IV, Special Provisions. (5) Specific actual charges for other costs related to providing services under the agreement including filing fees, long distance telephone calls, blood tests, polygraph tests, expert witness fees, transcripts, and services purchased from subcontractors. - (6) All other expenses must receive prior written approval by the Department. These may include, but are not limited to, capital outlay, automated data processing, lease or purchase of vehicles and purchase of services from subcontractors. - d. Reimbursement of costs incurred pursuant to this agreement is expressly contingent upon the availability of federal funds to the Colorado Department of Social Services and Department. e. The Department shall not be billed for and reimbursement shall not be made for time involved in activities outside of those defined in Exhibit I. unless prior-written approval of the Department is obtained. 4. Duties of the Department - The Department shall provide-the Contractor with all pertinent information available to the extent that such information is relevant to the services to be performed pursuant to-this-agreement. 5. Termination for Convenience or for Cause, ---••- - • - - . This agreement may be terminated with or without-cause by either parry upon written notice of at least thirty (30) days citing the reasons for termination- Upon such tr ^ation; the- Contractor shall fr.ms'sh to the - _ Department, as property of the Department, all property, records and pertinent information which the Department provided under this agreement. When the Contractor provides said property, records and information to the Department, the Department shall pay the Contractor for actual costs incurred through the last day of this agreement in accordance with paragraph 3 entitled, "Payment". 6. Amendment This agreement may be amended in whole or in part by mutual consent, provided that said amencment be reduced in writing on Form CSZ-4. properly executed and made a part of this agreement. All amendments are expressly made subject to the approval of the Executive Director. Colorado Department of Social Services, or designee; however, the State of Colorado, the Colorado Department of Social Services and the Emecutive Director, or designee, are no: parties to this agreement. S90398 • 7. Reports, Records, and Retention Periods The Contractor shall maintain such records as are deemed necessary pursuant to the Colorado Department of Social Services' rules to assure a proper accounting for all costs and funds collected. These records will be made available for audit purposes to the D.S. Department of Health and Human Services. the Colorado Department of Social Services. the Department, or any authorized representative of the State of Colorado. and will be retained for six (6) years after the expiration of this contract unless permission to destroy them is granted by the Colorado Department of Social Services. The Contractor shall make financial. program progress and other reports as requested by the -Department or Colorado Department of Social Services. S. Ecuitment Purchased with Federal,. State and County Money Title to all equipment acquired by the Contractor under this agreement at a cost of $500 or more for which the Contractor is reimbursed by the Department shall vest in the Department. Upon termination of this agreement, the Department may require the Contractor to deliver to the Department any such equipment acquired for the performance of this agreement. 9. Confidentiality Information provided by the Department for purposes of this agreement shall be used only for the purpose intended and in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations. • 10. Safeeuardinz Information. .., The Contractor shall provide_for the,security of information collected pursuant to this agreement and as provided•.in-the rules and regulations-- -- of the Colorado Department of Social Services. 11. Political Activities None of the fonds, materials, property, pe,so•^-%el or services contributed by the United States, the Colorado Department of Social Services or tae Department under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office in a manner which would constitute a violation of 5 U.S.C. Sections 1501 et. seq. • 890398 a • 12. Compliance with Applicable Laws The Contractor shall at all times during the execution of this Contract strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws and implementing regulations as they currently exist and may hereafter be admended. This includes protection of the confidentiality of all recipient/applicant records, papers, documents, tapes and any other materials that have been or may hereafter be established which relate to this Contract. The Contractor acknowledges that the laws include Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Education Amendments of 1972, and all regulations applicable to these laws prohibiting discrimination because of race, color, national origin, handicap; age, sex and religion. 13. Studies and Investigations All official reports of cases, recoveries, investigations, studies, etc., made as a result of this agreement shall acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Health and Human Services and Colorado Department of Social Services. 14. Subcontracts No subcontract shall be made by the Contractor with any other party for furnishing any services - -ratted for without the prior written consent, . .. . and approval, of the De, :. For services provided under any subcontract, the Ccnt_ac.;: . :all be responsible for contract performance--- and compliance with the term. and conditions of this agreement. The Contractor shall select-subcontractors on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of this agreement. — - 15. Special Provisions . The Contractor and Department agree to-the special provisions described in Exhibit IV, entitled, "Special Provisions", a cony of which is attached and incorporated by reference_ Special Provisions may imolude, but are not limited to, any performance standards negotiated by the Contractor and Department. 16. Responsibility for Conduct of Individuals The Contractor is solely responsible for the conduct of individuals employed by and under the direct supervision or control of the Contractor, identified in Exhibit II, "Computation of Personnel Costs for Services". Governmental functions provided in support of the child support enforcement program by individuals other than those identified in Exhibit Ii are not the responsibility of the Contractor except for acceptance or rejection of the work product of such individuals, 6 890395 i • 17. Special Attorney (Not'Applicable to Purchase of Services Agreement) The Contractor or the Department may determine that the Contractor has a conflict of interest which will prevent the Contractor from being able to fulfill and complete all the terms of this agreement. Upon such a determination, the Department is authorized to hire a special attorney to fulfill and complete such duties. The special attorney shall be given and act under the same powers as the Contractor hired under this agreement. The special attorney shall receive payment for services from the Contractor with the requirement that the Department reimburse the Contractor for the expense. 18. Attorney Aooearaace, (Not Applicable to Purchase of Services Agreement) To the extent reasonable and practicable. and consistent with applicable state regulations. the Contractor agrees to appear in proceedings before the courts of his county on behalf of other County Departments when authorized by the Department. • 7 • 890398 . The Department and Contractor have therefore caused this agreement to be executed by their respective officers duly authorized to do so. • This agreement is expressly made subject to the approval of the Executive Director, Colorado Department of Social Services, or his designee: however, the State of Colorado, the Colorado Department of Social Services, the Executive Director, or his designee, are not parties to this agreement. & 4—fa/ yA—/- l Cgty Director / Date E, ^ P Date • :tractor Date Member County oard of e Name, Address, and Phone No.) Social Services el, 5 aex i/ cif-N tjl cob.-4, e) 700 % Y ' 'k,,\ 9/7, Member County Board of • . hate----Social Services APPROVED: rA'2 OF COLORADO ROY ROMER, Governor _ * ��/01p -- ember County Board of Date Social Services �'"�'L--^'7^—, '7-/419 , Member County Board o£ / D&e for Executive Director Date ----Social Services Colorad Department Social Services ATTEST: 777 �/� J /j ny�t{p � � Membet �C' Boa Date e ut County Cllel4c Social Services �� Y t If the Board of Social Services resolves to ennower the+'* Chair= of the Board of Social Services to enter into and sign this agreement for the County Commissioners then a copy of the Board's resolution to do so must be attached. J • 890398 • • EXHIBIT I SCOPE OF SERVICES - -' Page 1 of 2 A. Mandatory Services For All tV-D Cases (check appropriate boxes) 1. [ 3 PARENTAGE DETERMINATION -- Activities related to determining the parentage of dependent children (19-4-101, et seq, 14-5-128, CRS). 2. >4( ESTABLISHMENT OF THE LEGAL OBLIGATION TO SUPPORT — Activities related to determining the amount of an absent parent's child support obligation including methods and terms of payment, modification of orders, and medical support (14-10-115, 19-4-116, 19-6-103, 14-5-125, CRS). 3. [ ] ESTABLISHMENT OF THE AMOUNT OF SUPPORT — Activities related to determining the amount of an absent parent's child support legal obligation (14-10-115, 19-4-116, 19-6-103, 14-5-125, CRS). 4. ' [ ] CHILD SUPPORT DEBT — Activities related to establishing and collecting child support debt owed to the Department of Social Services (14-14-104, 26-13-108, CRS). 5. [ ] URESA (Colorado Initiating) — Activities related to the - initiation of child support enforcement reciprocal support - ---- - actions (14-5-101, et seq, CRS). . 6. ) URESA (Colorado Responding) — Activities related to the . • - - processing of child support enforcement reciprocal support actions initiated by other jurisdictions (14-5-101,-CRS).- 7. pill ENFORCEMENT — Activities to enforce the collection of support including, but not limited -to obtaining wage assignments (14-14-107, CRS), obtaining judgments (CRC? Rule 54); executing post judgment remedies (such as continuing wage garnishment — 14-14-105 and 13-54-104 (3), CZ. CRC Rule 103, and property liens — 13-52-101, et_ seq, _CRS, CROP Rule 102, CRC? Rule 69). 8. ti-] REPORTING — Activities related to providing statistical, fiscal, and other records necessary for reporting and accountability as required by the State Department and the Department of Health and Human Services (HMS). 690398 • EXHIBIT I SCOPE OF SERVICES Page 2 of 2 B. Other services which may be performed (check appropriate boxes) 1. [ ] INTAKE -- Activities associated with initial child support .case opening and information collection. 2. LOCATE -- Activities associated with locating an absent parent and assets of the absent parent. 3. [ F FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT — Activities related to determining an absent parent's ability to provide support. 4. [ ] COLLECTION -- Activities related to monitoring support payments and processing cash flow pursuant to the Finance Staff Manual requirements. 5. PC INVESTIGATION .— Activities related to investigation necessary to accomplish child support enforcement functions. C. Address(s) and telephone number(s) where services will be provided by Contractor: • • • 890395 EXHIBIT II COMPUTATION OF PERSONNEL COSTS FOR SERVICES Purchase of Services Agreement (Form CSE-3) (Non—Legal Services) A. Supervisor Jesse Vigil List the title of the person who will set personnel policies, appoint new employees and will otherwise exercise supervisory authority for services to be provided under this agreement. Title Owner B. Indicate below the method of determining the cost for services provided. Costs may be an hourly rate or a specified dollar amount for each service provided. Costs are determined by multiplying the rate developed by the estimated number of hours or estimated number of services to be provided. COMPENSATION For documents requiring personal service, a fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) shall be paid for each succsessful service of process. In addition to the fee, round trip mileage will be paid at the rate of twenty cents per mile. For documents not requiring personal service, a fee of fifteen dollars ($15.00) shall be paid for each successful service. In addition to the fee, round trip mileage will be paid at the rate of twenty cents per mile. Payment of fees shall be made only if service of process is successful. No fee shall be paid if service is not successful. For the purpose of this contract, documents requiring personal service are Subpoenas, Contempt Citations, Summons with Subpoena, Wage Assignments and Garnishments. Round trip mileage will be considered travel from Service Providers Greeley Office to Respondent's location and return trip to Greeley Payment of mileage allowance shall be made whether is successful or unsuccessful. C. Total Services Cost $ 5,000.00 (Transfer the total to Exhibit III, line 1) 890398 EXHIBIT III • AGREEMENT BUDGET FOR PERIOD OF May '. 19 S9THROUGH Tlrrenber 1' , 19 9 1. Services or Personnel costs, including employee benefits. - (From Exhibit II C) $ 4 ,00n .nn - 2. Travel $ 1 nnn nn 3. Training Costs $ 4. Operating costs $ 5. Specific actual costs $ a. Auto=ated Data Processing:: _ $ _ . b. Office Space $ - c. Capital Outlay S d. Blood Tests - $ e. Other (specify) $ TOTAL COSTS $ 5 ,000 . 00 890398 r • EXHIBIT IV PURCHASE OF SERVICES SPECIAL PROVISIONS (1) QUALIFICATIONS OF EMPLOYEES The Process Serving Firm agrees to only employ individuals of good character and specifically agrees that it's employees shall be free of Criminal histories and agrees that it's employees shall not be individuals who are being prosecuted by the Child Support Enforcement Office. (2) CONFIDENTIALITY The Process Service Firm agrees that information provided by the Child Support Enforcement Unit to the Process Serving Firm for the purpose of obtaining service shall be considered confidential information and shall not be revealed to any third party. (3) Contractor agrees that it is an independent contractor and that it's officers and employees do not become employees of the County nor are they entitled to any employee benefits as County employees as the result of the execution of this agreement. (4) Contractor shall indemnify the County. it's officers and employees against liability for injury or damage caused by any negligent act or omission of any of it's employees or volunteers or agents in the performance of the approved agreement and shall hold the County harmless from any loss occasioned as a result of the performance of the contract by Contractor. The Contractor shall provide necessary Workman' Compensation Insurance at Contractor's own cost and expense. (5) Contractor assures that it will comply with Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964, and that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under the approved agreement. (6) County shall have access to contractor's financial records for purposes of audit. Such records shall be complete and available for audit ninety (90) days after final payment hereunder and shall be retained and available for audit purposes for five years after final payment hereunder. (7) Contractor may not assign or transfer the approved agreement, any interest herein or claim thereunder without the prior written approval County. (8) Time is of the essence in each and all the provisions of the approved agreement. 890398 EXHIBIT IV (CONTINUED) (9) No alteration or variation of the terms of the approved agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. (10) Contractor assures that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under the approved agreement. Rights Act of 1964 and that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under the approved agreement. —2— 890398 • /-94(pre-b-- STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES •P' 1575 Sherman Street 1989 JUl I Z Denver,Colorado 90203.1714 Lab Phone(303) 966.5700 a Roy Romer Governor Irene M. Ibarra Executive Director June 9, 1989 Mr. Eugene McKenna, Director Weld County Department of Social Services P.O. Box A Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. McKenna: This letter is to inform you that the Purchase of Services Agreement between the Weld County Department of Social Services and Jesse Vigil has been approved by this office. All claims for reimbursement under the terms of this agreement must be submitted to the State Accounting Office on form 5310.211 as specified in Volume 5.310.211 rules. If you have any questions, please call the State Division of Child Support Enforcement at 866-5994. Sincerely, /} �;OSA"-- + a. ShOndin Kathryn A. Sturm, Director Division of Chid Support Enforcement KAS/mz cc: John Daurio, Field Administration Dave Huffman, :V-D Administrator 330395 • u t I 4s''' MEMORAADUM Wilk T Tom David Date April 26, 1989 Weld County Attorney COLORADO F,omGene McKenna, Director, Social Services SubjectProcess Server - Jesse Vigil Tom, I am requesting your review and submittal to our Board of the attached Purchases of Services Agreement for Jesse Vigil. Mr. Vigil would serve as one of our process servers if approved by the Board. Thanks for your consideration. GM:jac ac cc: David Huffman Enclosure 39°398 a RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR COMPUTER SERVICES WITH CITY OF EVANS AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement for Computer Services between the City of Evans and Weld County, and WHEREAS, said Agreement shall be effective through December 31 , 1989 , with the terms and conditions being as stated in said Agreement, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement, a copy being attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement for Computer Services between the City of Evans and Weld County be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ) WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder r+ and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kir y�rman c2�L Ll JEac u Dl DATE OF SIGNING P - AYE . Jac u line Johnson, Pro-Tem D putt' County erk APPROl ED AS TO FORM: ,ene R. Brant r George Ken `ou ^` ,---. �/ / -�i.../ /44c -{-,County Attorney �" GordwilL L yJ t � ,.,...,., 890400 t,\)0003 K AGREEMENT FOR COMPUTER SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made this 8th day of May , 1989, by and between the CITY OF EVANS, COLORADO, with its principal place of business at 3700 Golden Street, Evans, Colorado 80620 hereinafter referred to as "Evans, " and the COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, a county government with its principal place of business being the Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Weld County," is subject to the following agreed statement of facts: A. This Agreement shall be effective immediately and shall continue through December 31, 1989, except as provided in paragraph 5 hereof. B, Evans has contracted for data processing consultation and training by Weld County. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing recitals and provisions, terms, and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1, Services Offered. a. Weld County agrees to perform the analysis necessary to: (1) . Identify areas of existing hardware incompatibility and make recommendations for correction. (2) . Identify areas of existing software incompatibility and make recommendations for correction. (3) . Coordinate training for Evans personnel on the functions of existing software. (4) . Identify long-range and short-term goals for computer functions for the City. (5) . Make recommendations for standardizing operating systems, computer software versions, computer hardware, and application procedures. (6) . Offer global recommendations for a computer network which would effectively utilize and share current resources and provide the necessary power and flexibility to meet both current and future needs. 2. Charges and Fees. a. Weld County shall provide Evans with a schedule of fees and charges for services and products which shall be the 890400 standard rates charged to all users of the Weld County Computer Center. Exhibit "A." Rates shall have a minimum revision of once annually, with this revision being effective January 1st of the new year. b. Evans agrees to pay on a monthly basis for all services at the rates established by Weld County as provided in paragraph "a." above, upon receipt of an itemized bill identifying such services, data, and rates. An estimate of these costs is included in Exhibit "B" , Section II . 3. Method of Delivery. a. Weld County agrees to provide Evans with onsite analysis and a written document outlining all recommendations. 4, Representations. a. Weld County represents that it will use its best efforts to provide accurate information to Evans pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. b. Weld County represents that it will follow all federal and state statutes, rules, and regulations for the installation, and distribution of copyrighted software products. c. Evans represents that it will provide/designate a "Data Processing Coordinator" who will be the sole conduit between Weld County and Evans in matters pertaining to data processing. d. Evans represents that it will provide Weld County with a memorandum outlining the manner in which Weld County is to divide its time between analysis, personnel training, and problem definition/resolution. 5. Miscellaneous. a. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of Weld County and Evans, b. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. c. Evans may not assign or transfer this Agreement, any interest therein, or claim thereunder without the prior written approval of Weld County. 890 400 d, Weld County or Evans may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving the other a ten-day written notice of termination and may terminate this Agreement at any time without notice upon a material breach of the terms of this Agreement by the other party. e. The relative liabilities of Evans and Weld County for any action brought as a result of an injury to a person or property shall be determined in accordance with C.R.S. , Section 13-21-111.5 (1987 Repl. Vol. ) . Evans and Weld County shall provide necessary workmen's compensation insurance at their own cost for their own personnel. f, No portion of this Contract shall be construed to confer a benefit or the right of a cause of action lying in tort, contract, or otherwise upon any person or entity not a party to this Contract, Furthermore, no portion of this Contract shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any governmental or personal immunities held by the parties or their officers, agents, or employees. g, All notices required to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be effective upon the dispatch of a copy of the notice, first class mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. Notice to Evans shall be given to the Mayor of the City of Evans, 3700 Golden Street, Evans, Colorado 80620. All notices to Weld County shall be sent to Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, P. 0. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632, with a courtesy copy to the Director of Information Services, P. 0. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers or representatives.'1/2711 - -a, . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: (' WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder • and Clerk to the Boa By: (/ 1I C. W. Kirby, C airman , Z ! eputy County C k ATTEST: City of Ev COLORADO 44` ..--44/ Town Clerk yor 890400 WELD COUNTY INFORMATION SERVICES RATES 1939 RATE • COMPUTER USAGE PROCESS TIME/HOUR PRIME TIME $633.3332 PROCESS TIME/HOUR NIGHT $319. 1666 DISK ACCESSES/1000 PRIME TIME $ 0.9078 DISK ACCESSES/1000 NICHT $ 0.4539 TAPE ACCESSES/1000 PRIME TIME $ 0.7431 TAPE ACCESSES/1000 NIGHT $ 0.3716 TEMP STORAGE/1000 PRIME TIME $ 0.7431 TEMP STORAGE/1000 NICHT $ 0.3716 TRANSIENT DATA/1000 PRIME TIME $ 0.9078 TRANSIENT DATA/1000 NIGHT $ 0.4539 DIALUP CONNECT TIME PER MINUTE $ 0.04 PRINT CHARGE PER PACE: 1 PART PAPER $ 0.0400 2 PART PAPER $ 0.0500 3 PART PAPER $ 0.0600 4 PART PAPER $ 0.0700 SPECIAL FORMS $ 0.0400 PRINTER SETUPS $ 0.5000 DATA STORAGE: DISK/1000 CHARACTERS PER YEAR $ 0.0400 TAPE REELS PER REEL $ 12.5000 TAPE MOUNTS PER MOUNT $ 0.0500 PROGRAMMER AND ANALYST (PER HOUR) : ANALYST/SYSTEMS PROGRAMMER I/II $ 26.244 PROGRAMMER $ 13.41 MICROFICHE/MICROFILM: MICROFICHE ORIGINAL $ 0.1500 MICROFICHE DUPLICATE $ 0,1200 MICROFICHE FRAME $ 0.0100 MICROFILM ORIGINAL '$ 0.1500 MICROFILM FRAME $ 0.0100 EXHIBIT "A" 890400 El I SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ps, Problem Definition The City of Evans is using a Data General Nova III mini computer for processing their General Ledger and Utility Billing applications. It does not produce any of the City's payroll at this time. This computer is budgeted for replacement in 1990. The City also has several IBM personal computers as well as some IBM clones, The PC systems are running several different versions of the DOS operating system. They are using Word Perfect for word processing but are running different versions of the application. From time to time individuals find it necessary to move document files and other files from PC to PC and are encountering application problems, hardware problems, and procedural problems. Several individuals are using the Symphony software for producing spreadsheets. Many functions of the software have not been used because of a lack of knowledge on how to use them. Problems are apparent in the areas of hardware/software compatibility, standardization of procedures, and general knowledge of - applications and personal computers. Obiectives of the Proiect To identify areas of existing hardware incompatibility and make recommendations for correction. To identify areas of existing software incompatibility and make recommendations for correction. To coordinate training for personnel. on functions of existing software applications. To identify long-range and short-term goals for computer functions for the City. To make recommendations for standardizing operating systems, - computer software versions, computer hardware, and application procedures. u To offer global recommendations for a computer network which - effectively utilizes and shares resources and provides the - necessary power and flexibility to meet both current and future needs. EXHIBIT "B" 890400 I i a System Narrative Weld County Information Services will provide technical staff to identify the current computer environment at the City of Evans and any existing compatibility problems. The study will address, personal computers, the mini computer, printers, modems, special adapters, displays and any other computer peripherals currently being used, The City of Evans employees will be interviewed to identify known problems which are impacting productivity. At the conclusion of the analysis a written recommendation will be provided to propose solutions to software and hardware issues. The document will include, a definition of each problem area, one or more solutions, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Personal computer software products such as Symphony which are currently owned by the City of Evans will be evaluated and recommendations will be made on their appropriateness. The recommendations will include, an overview of the functions each application provides, an evaluation of how well the product performs the function, and recommended situations specific to the City of Evans where the application can be used to increase productivity. Assistance will be provided in the development of long range and short-term goals for computer processing needs and requirements. User requirements for a general ledger system, utility billing, payroll system and other administrative applications will be determined with assistance from the City. User goals for word processing, spreadsheet, and other end-user applications will be defined. Based on this information a statement of direction will be created outlining the City of Evans' automation goals with suggested time frames. Using the statement of direction, computer options will he investigated. A proposal will be made with one or more configurations depicted for a future data processing network. The document will include an overview of the network with a suggested time table of implementation. Additionally it will include specific goals which can be realized with implementation of each phase and estimated costs. 890400 IL. ESTIMATED COSTS Development Costs 1. 15 Analyst Days @ $ 210 /day $ 3,150 Personnel Days for Software Subtotal $ 3,150 Cost Summary TOTAL COSTS FOR CONSULTING $ 3,150 890400 . . • copy CITY OF EVANS, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 731-89 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVANS AND WELD COUNTY FOR COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES PROVIDED BY WELD COUNTY, INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City of Evans has, over the past several years, purchased numerous personal computers and printers, and several versions of various software programs; and WHEREAS, problems have developed involving incompatibility of hardware and software, insufficient training, and tack of planning; and WHEREAS, due to these problems, efficiency and productivity are not being maximized; and WHEREAS, the City of Evans does not currently have the expertise within its staff to effectively address and resolve such problems; and WHEREAS, an emergency exists in that computer-related problems which have developed need to be addressed on a timely basis, and it is in the best interest of the City to proceed with the resolution of these problems as soon as possible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANS, COLORADO: 1 . The Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County, attached hereto, is approved and the Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute such Agreement. 2. This Ordinance is immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on first reading as an emergency ordinance on this 2nd day of May , 1989. CITY OF F NS, COLORAD By ..ei Mayor ATTEST: city �le� ,n, 890400 • RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CORRECTED QUIT CLAIM DEED CONCERNING VACATION OF RUTH PLACE IN WATTENBERG AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, in 1980 , the Board issued various Quit Claim Deeds concerning the vacation of Ruth Place in the unincorporated town of Wattenberg, located in the NE! of Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, and WHEREAS, a portion of the right-of-way was omitted from the Quit Claim Deed issued to Richard and Lena B. Hernandez at that time, and WHEREAS, the Board has now been presented with a Quit Claim Deed concerning the omitted portion of said right-of-way, and WHEREAS, Lena B. Hernandez is deceased and the corrected Deed shall be issued to Richard Hernandez, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it appropriate to approve said Quit Claim Deed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Quit Claim Deed for Richard Hernandez, concerning the omitted portion of Ruth Place in the unincorporated town of Wattenberg be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is , authorized to sign said Quit Claim Deed. G ?/2!i5' 9/2, . , / /%mind; 890401 N V/ 4 Page 2 RE: CORRECTED QUIT CLAIM DEED - HERNANDEZ The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 8th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . , � �� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: )4� „J WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County lerk and Recorder "fJ and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Cifairman EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE \SY: O2;421e/ a 1 Oa reline Johnson, Pro-Tem eputy County rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: e R. Bran ne r � ��/ _--_- I% � G rqe as,2,941r.z�-- . . ,� z_Y�, y} County Attorney CiC GOT ('"E'- La7 V 890401 . i (` P 1U4 454 485 � RECE IF T FOR CERTIFIED MAR.1k41+ Richard Hernandez 1926 Grace Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Posl ah !wn et. IL i.e. 0 S , r-rs) a Etfl�r� P<ce- I t Vp aeon. ['Jr. e C Acid.P 55 ss of of Deliver, C j 'OlA: Ptnl ig.:all Fees 5 LL 16 i Recorded at deloclr M. Reception Na Recorder, I ,I I t j THIS DEED, Made this 8th day of may ,i989, ! c 0 between Weld County, Colorado, a body corporate and politic 'I 0 Il .r I of the County of Weld and state of 'I :O Colorado,of the first part,and Richard Hernandez iI 1 ❑ a 0 .,a 0 whole legal address is 1926 Grace Avenue I o x Fort Lupton, Colorado ondetateof ! r? of of the County of Weld CII C !I YY Colorado,of the second part. (NO MONETAR CONSIAERATION)) '1 o WITNESSETH,That the said part of the first part.for and in consideration of ( road vacationl r... a I pursuant to 43-2-302(d) , C.R.S. ---X5'L7(Xfc !I .n xomtaxxixlp:axaxx»atcxodeficlua cYixxameploxatepmemxfmpoxsycxxxxxxxxxamtxracoutamx:mbaratclawtxxent !I en iextexabsamonatadonatsuanoadadmett. has remised. released, sold, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and by these II '•1 54 II presents do remise,release.sell,convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the said party of the second part, his heirs. i I a 4: i successors and assigns,forever.all the right,title,interest,claim and demand which the said party of the first part I co m U I has in and to the following described lot or parcel of land situate,lying and being in the County N z of Weld and State of Colorado,to wit: CO The South Half of the intersection of abandoned Ruth Place and abandoned Edward I in 0 m Street which is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 1, Block 7, which is the Point of Beginning. Thence Easterly 60 feet to the • p Northwest Corner of Lot 16, Block 6; Thence North 30 feet; Thence Westerly 60 ! CO w feet; Thence Southerly 30 feet to the Point of Beginning, all located in the al N 2 unincorporated town of Wattenberg located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 25, � a 4 Township 1 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. 0 1 Ua • 1 a N 01 • M MD N I N - l ."1 H 0:1 :L4 II I I I 11 • also known as street and number I II I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same,together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto I belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining,and all the estate,right,title,interest and claim whatsoever,of the said party of the first part,either in law or equity,to the only proper use,benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part. his heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,The said party of the first part has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IgEAL) t ed,Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of WELD COUNTY, COLORADO S jam_ :SEAL] I ii weicC ncy Clerk an ecorder By: �,2 !SEAL) C. W. Kirby,ihairman De uty County Cie !SEAL) TATE OF COLORADO, 1 } se. County of J The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this 8th day of May _ 1g 89,by C. W. Kirby, Chairman, on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County. Colorado. My commission expires August 7 . 989.Witness my hand and official seal. 21"4-ehtj 717 entn ot., yr ley, LA.) Notary Public. ' 1 • No.933.qulrctelfottO.—Bradford PubaaMnfCo.,1s24.t63tout Straot,D Colorado(573450111-9477 ''1:�j PURPORTED COPY 890401 r tommtimi I, ca e°�'911 w.+.+� OCT_ 13 BBD c •....time '�'N"'.3+taw.�Ti. le • v—ay.11'Z'+" I TMIJDiMR N.ot.N 10th a•fef October • i 80 l wt.... Weld County, Colorado, • body corporate and politic, efts Cstnt weld ad@Wed • o.war.eftsn.t..t.ad Richard and Lana B. Aernandsz. • Or • w...wal.Mn..r 1926 Grace Avenue Port Lupton, Colorado . eft►n anew or weld ad.wwef • aw.aaeftsa.d r•r. . P. wITNia.a714.Teel the au petty .Ow lint pert w.d w solanalm.efts ear et M... 0 r, loth@ add put)? eft..OS opt wsd.ldby the odd p.niae 4 One....S maths•••••• tat o a hereby..haw ad..s..w4.L..e r. t4..l.a.t.Mt sieved.d QUIT CL JWfl w by limes 0 P••••••4•6416 n.t....ln a.r.a.w..q ad QUITMAIN as.the meld p..tiaatttsroad p.a tlhtrst.S mama ad.ds.a a..•M the Oat,CS. madar..d.warts meld potty ell►.Mt we sa load•the M,..t deowthed iet Sr panel.1 laS Owes. .d IMP w tY• a..ts • ef wild adsta.dcwww•www en en All of Ruth Place from its intersection with the South Right-of- way of Edward Street to the extension of the South property line of Lot 2. Block 7, and the South Ralf of Edward Street from its Intersection with the Denver-Laramie, Northwestern' Railroad - Right-of-way, commonly known as Grace P1a-o, to its intersection with Ruth Place, all located in the unincorporftsd.town of • Wattenberg located in the Northeast Quarter:oL°wenkion 2S, Town- ' ship 1 North, Range 67 west of the 6th P.N.; Weld.County. Colorado. 9 - aelaws so Area WI labor • TO RATS 1,14010 MOLD is raw.Welber wit)..s ad en.w,ts. ..r----. 1,d L me tsar.... ..wetaa.r Is Walla ale Ina.MwtaMN.ea a the..S%MK t•we'SWIM tad tM...d.N...dta. - ri party 1 tins/i.Imo.,mewt..low the a.ir row@me%..wnad s..wt.ts aid pretest am meord'erg mid aping terms DfltyntlY nRrntor",The aW.sly a/s Arse wens smote at its bad ad..l the day.d rem tent flews..et.. Una'9:9tanma Spa O&M and Doted w the F...,.e1 CD CO[EIlY, COLCMmDO pxau by_ le 1, is 441 isaau C. w. Eli rf. Chabisa luau aunincowaasa . + W'� nrr•fi4a lama tiY /J atlMl...,, N // v is ,friggitsza • Nu j • r . • N.altw.waP' t ---,. fil a..11•terrfa.ar.rhehees .•— et 9 Tilt 890401 RESOLUTION RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL ACTION AGAINST CERTAIN PARTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE WELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE AND THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Department of Planning Services has referred certain violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance to the County Attorney's Office, and WHEREAS, those persons in violation of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance are Monfort of Colorado; Bruce D. Reed; Trader, Incorporated; and Londell and Byron Bunting, and WHEREAS, despite efforts by the Planning staff to resolve said matters, the violations have not been corrected, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it necessary to bring legal action against those individuals as hereinabove named to correct said violations. NOW, THEREFORE, PE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that Thomas 0. David, Weld County Attorney, be, and hereby is, authorized to proceed with legal action against Monfort of Colorado; Bruce D. Reed; Trader, Incorporated; and Londell and Byron Bunting to remedy the violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and any other persons occupying the properties , any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. 77 -71.� 890397 ? 35t7 Page 2 RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � WELD COUNTY; COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder 4'f and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, C irman EXCUSED • � J AS ie Johnson, Pro-Tem rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: / ' . . .--- __:"....,..... ,---7 ...Jan- George Ke ne -- County Attorney Gorda ^�: Lacy ✓✓✓ 890397 MEMORAIIDU WilkTo Board of County Commissioners ')at• May 5, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services sooliet. Legal Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following party for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-287 Bruce D. Reed 1850 Southern Brighton, CO 80601 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the property, any persons claiming an interest is the property, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. �890397 fEMORAnDU WIiIc. T, Board of County Commissioners nme May 8. 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services subject: Legal. Action Authorization The Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the 1'eld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance Building Code Ordinance Violations: BCV-1069 Monfort of Colorado 650 "0" Street P.O. Box G Greeley, CO 80632 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties, any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 590391 1EMORAI1DU 1111e. To Board of County Commissioners 10, May 5, 1989 COLORADO From Department of Planning Services Subject Legal Action Authorization the Department of Planning Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Weld County Attorney to proceed with legal action against the following parties for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance Violations: VI-1336 VI-J334 Trader, Incorporated Loncell and Byron Bunting 1826 First Avenue 21529 Weld County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 Greeley, CO 80631 The Department of Planning also recommends that the County Attorney be authorized to proceed with legal action against any other persons occupying the properties. any persons claiming an interest in the properties, and any persons acting in active concert with the identified parties. Copies of .the violation materials are available at the Department of Planning Services' office or the Weld County Attorney's office. 890397 I5-oar FORM PRESCRIBED DV THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR FORM 920 1/60-1/84 PETITION FOR AOATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES—Rorcet,. CO., °ERVE„ 33.03 Petitioners: Use this side only. d G ,rere.1e. , Colorado, AW4 I .„ 19S' City or To n / To The Honorable Board of County Commissioners of W Qa County Gentlemen: /� The petition of m f k2 SQ.9Q. DX-.c . whose mailing address is:. R.(07(O !y,�l ' i_ k— it G Co[swage c(_X,03I City orf Town State Zip Code SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL p CO c-i`J9 i2t r e5 , scre A Frost mucLiDs 3673 Atteut M4cktvvi s , Ca k k- Sins , Chalrs respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A. D. 19 07 19..2b.., 19 are erroneous or illegal for the following reasons, viz: (Explain completely why the assessment is erroneous or illegal) `I '.s.. gcSessfi�.tth ; sdc r' assdls g' *'c p;eoiais aWACIAr at tNC tw(s.ne9S SSCAS 0 'c. cApeal ittkiOect of\ our dlaaatakimi• Schad-. fk SO4- ins f ach(tSek Oss4+s 4tuv. (SOYY skikTs w. Avg- 68' $1' l 131,42-3 V %us, s-Lary 11(0Afsg 19.b7.. 19.2k. 19 .55 Value Tax Value Tax Value Tax Orig. 105) 653.44 610O 7a4-34 6E� 659'.ato Abate. ;570O 330,.% ....310 335.,:a .ao 3111. 3`{ Bal. +Ito 393. 33SD 313.$$• 3530 341a,3p That he has paid said taxes. Wherefore your petitioner prays that the taxes, as afo said erroneously or illegally assessed, may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 1CO.7..d I declare, under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. 1,14s_ Petiti er By r (— Agent Address a�J70 B k-L Gay , so(03/ ,./26-2 /5y. .U�ii6„ ✓n.(',','C.:^ /.try . 890412 I I a RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS. The County Commissioners of Weld County. State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the 10th day I of May A.D. 19 89 at which meeting there were present the following members. Chairman C.W. Kirby and Commissioners Gene R. Brantner, George Kennedy, and Gordon E. Lacy, with Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson being absent notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County and said Assessor Richard W. Keirnes and taxpayer Mike Sage being present; and (name) (name) WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within applica- tion, and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board concurs with the recommendation of (concurs or does not concur) the assessor and the petition be (papprove,d__..., and an abatement/refund be allowed 378I8pr'veQ Rtdenled) (be allowed or not be allowed) on an assessed valuation of$..3.477U0 - '8.6 for $ 1,007.64 total tax for the year(s) 1985, 86 & 87 3520 - '85 er.fl / Chairman of Board ppff County Commissioners. STATE OF COLORADO, Weld ss. County of 1 I Mary Ann Feuerstein County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld , State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Weld County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Greeley this 10th ,day of May , A. D. 19 89 2 c ute n! (/ - County Clerk. Deputy. ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR Denver, Colorado, 19 The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby O approved: O approved in part $ ❑ denied for the following reason(s) ATTEST: Secretary. Property Tax Administrator. 4 r `4„ ` FY. .2 g I"q Q..Illb 1I P v-. ' y + a . W V $ ..... a a ° c aC �, � I w o�_ wog o °, W O m 1 v V y Ey 2r v2• o 8 O O S. � 2 c -Cr" 3 W 0 N L� va W _ cr. I E To o {i .j V Z.L.7 r. o.r. 8L ,[ a > C (tly0 fn 1w W a, .aIL 0ye o a r `U f? c o _° a id 0. P ,', Ca � �Cr 2 In o r N'to ° :° East Z vc‘\,_ i`< C 412 ^g ° coua� a„ �r�� •• 3 8 a ryi '� �J��,y�� OTC �Q n it, F. o sec< &o,, MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER P.O. 8OX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80832 (303)3584000 EXT.4225 COLORADO April 28, 1989 Mike Sage, Inc. 2676 11th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Sage: This is to advise you that the Weld County Board of County Commissioners will hear your petition for tax abatement or refund on the property described as: Schedules P008479 and P002673. This meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 10, 1989, at 9:00 A.M. at which time you may be heard. The meeting will be held in the Chambers of the Board, Weld County Centennial Center, First Floor, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the above specified time. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Mary Ann Feuerstein Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board BY: C�Q9 . Deputy ount C rk XC: Assessor 890412 WELD COUNIY , COLORAD filial 1 0 PAYROLL FUND CLAIMS - WARRANT P.O. & NO . VO. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14316 082791 NNN, GEiNERAL INSURANCE O0. 6,604.13 - I I - State of Colorado ) TOTAL 6,604.13 ) ss County of Weld This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed _ on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through 1 and dated MAY 10th 198_2 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite - their names with the total amount $ 6,604.13 • - Dated this 10th day of MAY 9 It/Weld County nce fficer . Subscribed and sworn to before me this lO day of MAY , 196 9 My commision expires: My Commission ExpiresJu / kotary Public 'vvv ��" State of Colorado ) ) ss County of Weld ) - We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the ppyRDLT Fund totaling S §,604.13 Chairperson Meet r =" Aiem er ny Cleirk and Recorder . Member mil Cl/c�7,L- (-47( ,' /' .�/ .-payl Member tw-.. Id & r WELD c0U:iY , COLORAD rflu6 1 CaNERAL FUND CLAIMS ' ARRANT P.O. & NO . VO. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 902339 WILLIAM F WTCKERSHAM AND TONI M WIOCRSHP2.I 2,371.16 902340 WILLIAM F WIC[TRSHAM AND TONI M WICIMSHAM 1,350.00 I _ State of Colorado ) TOTAL 3,721.16 ) ss County of Weld ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pages 1 through and dated PAY 10th , 198 9 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 3,721.16 Dated this 10th day of MAY , ]�' 3 9 :1 I --- Weld County Fi a 0, 7 cer Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10th _ day of MAY , 1989 My comnision expires: ,lip .( im- /7 7L44 Notary Public State of Colorado ) ) s$ County of Weld ) We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the GENERAL Fund totaling S 3,721.16 e/A./4 Chairperson Memb :7—EST: Member y% , _ ,/,/...____..44 ....nty jerk and Recorder ;7 y . Member 1 / Member t Cl(lll kkkl c-,-- P - ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : I • AS OF : 05/08/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110524 AAMCO TRANSMISSION RM0489 21-6380-6380-8 300.00 SS0489 21-6380-6390-8 12564.45 • • 1 ,864.45 • • A110525 ANDERSEN' S SLS G SALVAGE 9154 01^2111-6361-SOPT 50.00 • 50.00 • • A110526 ORATION'S , INC 01644 01-2110-6220-RECD 17.83 • 01649 01-2110-6220-ADM 6. 40 • 24.23 • _ • A110527 BRICK, INC. 10295 01-1061-6360-CC 156.66 • 156.66 • • A110528 BUNTING TRASH SERVICE 9479 01-1061-6347-CC 19.00 • 9480 01-1061-6347-CC 88.00 • 9481 01-1061-6347-CC 42.00 9484 01-1061-6347-CC 63.00 • 9485 01-1061-6347-CC 147.00 • - 9486 01-1061-6347-CC 22.00 9487 01-1061-6347-CC 19.00 • 9488 01-1061-6347-CC 22.00 • 9490 01-1061-6347-CC 33. 50 9491 01-1061-6347-CC 19.69 • 9492 01-1061-6347-CC 33. 50 • 9493 01-1061-6347-CC 60.00 9499 01-1061-6347-CC 22.00 • 9513 01-1061-6347-CC 19.00 • 9520 01-1061-6347-CC 42.00 • 651 . 69 • • A110529 CARLSON NORMAN riI0489 01-1110-6370 46. 40 • 46.40 • • • • • • ID ID 1 I I I I , I I I I I I I. . . __ • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 ID AS OF : 05/08/89 ID WARRANT PAYEE INUOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID _ NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 4110530 CASES JEFFREY SS0389 21-6380-6390-8 92. 88 TUIT89 21-6380-6390-8 75.00 4I ID 167. 88 ID • A110531 CENTENNIAL HEALTH CARE PG0489 21-6490-6380-8A 132.33 ID 132. 33 Ik IP 111105.32 CLEMCO1 INC. CP0489 21-6490-6380-8A 353.82 A 353.82 • • AI10S33 COUNTRY GENERAL 407692 01-2111-6220-NOPT 19. 20IP . - 19. 20 ID • 4110534 DAVID, THOMAS O. MIO589 01-1012-6370 102.75 • 102. 75 e A110535 DEEP ROCK ST0589 21-6980-6533 17. 80 ID 17. 80 ID ID A11O536 ECONOMY LUMBER C HARDWARE 423764 01-1061-6360-CC 47.22 • . 47. 22 • A110537 FLATIRON PAVING CO 10843 11-3190-6471 292. 00 10843A 11-3190-6471 487. 60 41 10844 11-3190-6471 328.50 ID 10B44A 1I-3190-6471 414.00 ID 1 ,522. 10 A IP A110538 GREELEY LOCK E KEY 31507 01-1061-6360-CC 19.00 II 19.00 • ID • • • • ! ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • AS OF : 05/00/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT . NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • Al ►0539 HUGH M. WOODS 944210 01-2111-6220-NOPT 37.35 • 37.35 • • A110540 JERALD CONSTRUCTION 802320 3♦-1944-6920-SHOP 183.145.00 • 183.145.00 • • A110541 KAPLAN SCHOOL SUPPLY CORP 405022 21-6600-6224-9 2.605.20 • • 2,605.20 • • A110542 KOMAC PAINT G DECORATING 26247 34-1944-6920-SHOP 18535800 26270 01-1061-6234-CC 38.98 • • 1 .574.98 • • A110543 MAJORS WELUING 6 SUPPLY 11909 60-2160-6220 33.00 12227 60-2160-6220 4. 50 • 12365 60-2160-6220 13. 50 • 12416 60-2160-6220 6.53 12461 60-2160-6220 6.53 • 12525 60-2160-6220 6.53 • 12787 60-2160-6220 13. 50 12821 60-2160-6220 26.56 • • 110.65 • • A110544 MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR CO 682059 01-1061-6389-CC 18475. 12 • 1 ,475. 12 • • A110545 NELSON OFFICE SUPPLY 82394 11-3140-6229 66.08 • 66.08 • • A► 10546 NERCO INC 19511 01-106►-6236-CC 30. 60 • 23168 01-1061-6236-CC 14 .63 • 23453 01-1061-6236-CC 13.33 • • • • • • i 1 41 4 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 ID AS OF : 05/08/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 0 NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT UBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • • A110546 NEWCO INC 23469 O1-1061-6236-CC 23. 00 • 81. 56 ID • A110547 OFFEN ACE HARDWARE 09699 01-1061-6360-CC 7 . 19 4, 09923 01-1061-6360-CC 80.50 11113 01-1061-6360-CC 129.06 • 11143 01-1061-6360-CC 16.09 ID 232. 84 • A110548 RAINBOW CARPET DYEING 6 285013 01-1061-6349-CC 218.70 • 218.70 • Ill A110549 ROCKY MTN POISON S 40589 00-2160-6229 161 .00 • 161 . 00 • A110550 SCOFIELDS ARCHITECT METAL 39889 01-1061-6360 40.00 40.00 ID ID A110551 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO 106298 01-1061-6360-CC 140.25 • I . 140.25 ID • A110552 SPAULDING' DAN EDO 89TUIT 21-6380-6381-8 555.00 • 555.00 ID ID A110553 STANLEY COMMERCIAL RADIO 013268 01-2111-6346 323.24 i 323. 24 • ID A110554 TARGET STORES 901186 01-2310-6220-IS0P 59.94 • • 59.94 • 5 • II ID IP WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 • AS OF : 05/08/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A110555 TURF TEC DISTRIBUTORS INC 148766 01-1061-6235-CC 75. 76 • 75. 76 • • A110556 WE8ER'S REPAIR 3064 01-1061-6360-CC 143.98 • 3069 01-1061-6360-CC 42.28- 2081 01-1061-6360-CC 26.70- • 3082 01-1061-6360-CC 42.28 • 117 .28 • • A110557 WOODS CANVAS PRODUCTS 11456 01-2111-6361-SOFI 50.00 • • 50.00 • • FINAL TOTAL : 196.245. 48 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/08/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • + AS OF : 05/08/89 • 0 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED UN THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH S i AND • DATED 05/08/89p AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 196,245.48 . • DATED THI 10 OF h ,i 19 89__. • • a . • DIREC OR OF FI A CE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10 DAY OF _f4 1989 • • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Cunmissron Expires June 8, 1990 • /l /� �) 0 - :w7Nnm "^puLiC • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • • (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE General FUND - TOTALING $ 196 245.48 • • DATED THIS 10 DAY OF Mat, 19 89 . ID COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY )2_41:24,--4.1...is-L44,..,i4.--.4 e 2 4<2,42 -t-r • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • , • _ « !� • /. • 7 MEMUL MEMBER ' III ' C t'it-/- MENDER MEMBER • 7 • • • • 0 • • 1 I I I I I III _ I I . I. I i i S • WWP45IP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 05/08/89 • PAGE 10 DAY CARE REPORT 18:30: 10 • DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 05/10/89 FOR THE MONTH PAID MAY 1989 • WARRANT I.D. PROVIDER NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER AMOUNT • • NUMBER OF WARRANTS = 117 TOTAL = $5;'964. 65 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN • • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE. LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 9 . AND • DATED OS/08/89, AND THAI PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN ENE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT i_iSl alL. . • • DATED THIS 10 D F ___MIL 19 13,2__. • • DIRE T F IN NCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • • SUDSCRi8E0 AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __2Q___ OAY OF _a__ ___ 19 $1_. • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Convrssion ExpiresiureS. 1990 • •41 NOTARY p BLIC • WE , THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE ; AND WARRANTS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Social SF.ru ices FUND - TOTALING i 51,964. 65 • DATED THIS 10 DAY OF May 19 89 . • `/77��7 Y- ien,e te;J • • COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • • _ 41-zz�Le__( v,J614-2 E'1?� -,-.24.4* • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN 41 Ye MEMBER / /�////f///�� MEMBER41 r, /.1- 7 • MEMBER MEMBER • , • 0 ID ID • WAP20OP WELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 0BJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110558 AIMS COLLEGE 0014180 21-6490-6381-8 1 &190.00 • +----_1 &&90.00 • • A110559 ALVARADO, MARIA 2972 21-6490-6398-8YT0 75.00 • • 75.00 • A110560 ANDERSON& QUINTIN 0006V5 24-9044-6397-4715 235.00 • 2226V4 24-9044-6397-4715 125.00 • 360.00 • 11110561 ANSON& ROSE 04785D 79-4410-6143 22. 50 • 067930 79-4410-6143 54.60 • • 77. 10 • • A110562 CHANT& LORETTA MI0489 21-6600-6375-9 ---55.50- • 55.50 • -_--- • A110563 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT 07519 01-2340-6214 85. 35 • 85. 35 • • A110564 COLORADOAN (FT COLLINSJ 618566 21-6600-6337-9 394 .85 • • 394 .85 • z=. • A110565 CURTIS& MARY RUTH 030789 79-4410-6143 13.91 • 4/4/89 79-4410-6143 12 .15 • 26 .06- • -z-- • 11110566 DENVER POST 923265 21-6600-6337-9 774. 00 • 774.00 • • • • • • li ii 4, WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 AS OF : 05/09/89 II WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OSJ PRDJ AMOUNT ID • A110567 EDWAROS. STANLEY 0. 1MD 04279 01-1123-6599 34.84 0 34.84 • =z s=sz=II • A110568 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 096713 21-6640-6311-8 12.00 • 903132 21-6510-6311-9 12.00 903213 21-6600-6311-9 12.00 • 36.00 • • A110569 FOOD SERVICES STO489 21-6600-6222-9 546.25 • 546.25 • s- • A110570 FRANZEN. DUANE GENE 011644 79-1191-6143 63.84 • 050589 79-1191-6147 55,00 • _-------IL8.84ID • A110571 FRLTCHELL , NORMA FD0489 21-6600-6377-9 3.82 • MIO489 21-6600-6375-9 21.30 • 25. 12 • r• • A110572 GENEALOGICAL PBLSMNG CO 91209 52-5510-6322 326.00 • 126 .00 • • A110573 GORDONS BOOKS INC 01980 52-5510-6322 28.23 • 019800 52-5540-6229 76.03 04640 52-5510-6322 126. 86 • 0464OC 52-5520-6322 11 .31 S 04640D 52-5540-6229 16.95 05410 52-5510-6322 649.68 • 05410C 52-5520-6322 24.51 • 054100 52-5540-6229 800.65 05414 52-5510-6322 8. 16- • 06720 52-5510-6322 243.04 i 06720C 52-5540-6229 91 .11 09510 52-5510-6322 87.93 • • • IP • • 4 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 1 3 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OSJ PROD AMOUNT • 41 A110573 CORDONS BOOKS INC 09510C 52-5540-6229 18.84 • 13190 52-5510-6322 57. 18 • 21010 52-5510-6322 530.33 21O10C 52-5520-6322 38.96 • 41 21793. 45 ss • A110574 GORDONS BOOKS INC 210100 52-5540-6229 27.00 • 26450 52-5510-6J22 91 .66 • 26450C 52-5510-6337 20. 10 • 26451 52-5510-6322 146.67e 264510 52-5540-6229 19. 47- • 36180 52-5510-6322 118. 49 • 36180C 52-5540-6229 23.25 40210C 52-5540-6229 27.00 • 43440 52-5510-6322 106. 10 • 43440C 52-5540-6229 11 .31 48210 52-5510-6322 191 . 79 • 50490 52-5510-6322 74.07 • 504900 52-5540-6229 26.37 58900 52-5510-6322 850.81 • 58900C 52-5510-6337 47. 10 . 58900D 52-5520-6322 7.53 • 1 ,456.44 • • A110575 CORDONS BOOKS INC 58900F 52-5540-6229 65.62 • 64820 52-5510-6322 1 ,315.21 64820C 52-5520-6322 23.88 • 648200 52-5540-6229 120.03 • 64821 52-5510-6337 6.27- 69270 52-5510-6322 135.79 • 69270C 52-5540-6229 62.83 . 79170 52-5540-6229 60.93 80410 52-5510-6322 127.88 • 80410C 52-5520-6322 15.06 • 804100 52-5540-6229 130.56 83940 52-5510-6322 81 .86 • 83940C 52-5540-6229 40. 14 41 85410 52-5540-6229 57.18 90470 52-5510-6322 299.54 • 90470C 52-5520-6322 14. 18 S 2,544.42 • • • • • . ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 • AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110576 GORDONS 800KS INC 90470D 52-5540-6229 292.96 • 99770 52-5510-6322 20. 10 99770C 52-5520-6322 42.06 • 997700 52-5540-6229 115.64 • 470. 76 • • A110577 GRANDE BUTTE HOTEL H00589 01-1011-6373-ALI 62.00 • 01-1011-6373-AL2 62. 00 • 01-1011-6373-01 62.00 01-1011-6373-D2 62.00 • 01-1011-6373-03 62.00 • 310.00 • • A110578 GREELEY GAS CU '694 01-1061-6340-ROAD 50. 18 • 8:197 01-1061-6340-ROAD 75. 28 • 125.46 • • A110579 LUCAS, DUANE 069830 79-23!4-6143 19.00 • • 19.00_ • . A110580 MCCLOSKEY1 CHRIS 050889 79-1191-6147 80.00 • 80.00 A110581 MEDICARE 11981 60-2160-6599 163.01 • 163.01 • • A110582 ME2Ai PAUL 28187 01-2420-6599 89.60 • i • _ 89.60 • • A110583 NORMEOCO AL0389 21-6820-6358-9344880- • 34.80 • • • • • • • ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INUOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID ID A11058♦ NORTH W C WATER DISTRICT 0321 25-9071-6397-GAL 3,500.00 • 58 25-9071-6397-GAL 31500.00 • 7 ,000.00 • _________====== 41 A11058S PADRONI MARGARET 016 79-1152-6147 58.50 ill 58. 50 • • A110586 PENNINGTON, ANNE ELIZABET 1311 79-2150-6143 15.00 • • 15.00 ID • 4110587 PET CITY MR0489 21-6490-6380-8A 307.97 • 307.97 • A110588 PETTY CASH - H R U MAY9 21-6390-6372-8 5.98 • 21-6510-6372-9 12.44 • 21-6510-6377-9 1 .65 21-6510-6390-9 5.00 • 21-6570-6372-9 1.60 • 21-6600-6372-9 1 .20 21-6850-6390-9 6 .33 • 21-6950-6311 25.00 • 59. 20 • _ • A110589 PETTY CASH-YOUTH SHELTER 050889 01-2330-6220 3.27 • 01-2330-6390 _--31075 • 35.02 • --- • A110590 PROFESSIONAL FINANCE CO 42489 60-2160-6561 96. 90 • 96. 90 • • Al10591 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 6479 01-1061-6340 12.40 • 6931 01-1061-6340 7.68 • • • ID ID ID ID WAP209P WELD COUNTY DAZE 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 ID AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 0 NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • A110591 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLD 20.08 . • A110592 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLO 5T0489 21-6590-6340-9 41 .84 • 41 .84 • s--- A110593 RADISSON INN 000380 01-1014-6370 70.55 0 70.55 e • A110594 RITCHEYS CRAFT 6 HOBBY 6046 52-5510-6210 17.56 • • 17. 56 • .---- • A110595 ROCKY MTN NAT GAS CO INC 7964 01-1061-6340-ROAD 97.65- • 97.65 • • A110596 RODRIGUEZ. CHARLOTTE 0489ST 21-6510-6358-9 434.00 • 21-6650-6358-9 72.00 . 506.00 A110597 RUNDUS. CAR0LYN J 1537 79-1012-6143 162.00 • 162.00 • • A110598 RURAL WELD PRESS ST0489 21-6460-6337-8 160.00 0 • 160.00 • • A110599 SCHOOL DISTRICT RESJ ST0489 21-6600-6222-9 343. 50 • 21-6600-6531-9 170.00 • 513 . 50 • • • • ID 4I • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 IP AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110600 SELECTVIOEO 2595 52-5510-6337 177.20 • -----�-177.20 • • A110601 SENIOR VOICE ST0589 21-6390-6337-8 220.00 • • 220.00 • ss • A110602 STRONG* DOROTHY MI0430 01-3700-6310 11. 20 • 11 .20 • r Ai1060J TOWN OF GROVER 188305 01-1061-6340-ROAD 34.75 • 34.75 A • A110604 TOWN OF KEENESBURG 288190 01-1061-6340-ROAD 21 . 50 • • 21 .50 • ID A110605 U S POSTMASTER 050889 0►-1011-6311 14.48 01-1012-ball 39.73 ID 01-1014-6310 188.54 01-1021-6310 3,565.54 • 01-1025-6310 42. 15 • 01-1031-6310 624.01 • 01-1041-6310 257. 58 • 01-1061-6710 9.46 01-1110-6310 10.68 • 01-1123-6310 226.42 . 01-1125-6311 3.15 01-1126-6311 61.57 • 01-1127-6311 44.92 . 01-1151-6310 18.27 01-1152-6310 300.50 • 01-1153-6311 142. 24 . 01-1154-6310 57 .23 01-2110-6311-GILL 607.03 • 01-2150-6311 6.28 • 01-2340-6321 24.30 01-2420-6310 99.89 • ID • ID e 5 • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 AS OF 1 05/09/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT 41 41 A110605 U S POSTMASTER 050889 01-3182-6310 308.87 • 01-3700-6310 17. 13 • 19-4110-6311 400.50 21-6600-6311-7 90.85 • 21-6950-6311 738. 10 • 60-2160-6310 258.64 64-1155-6310 80.00 • 65-1191-6310 ---------3943- • 8 ,283.49 • - ___=____ • A1 (0606 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ST0489 21-6490-6356-8 375.40 • 42289 52-5510-6336 - 230.00 i 605.40 41 41 A110607 VILLA (THE) APRIL 01-2320-6350-NRDI 1 ,331 .50 • 01-2320-6350-RSDI 30 ,589.00 • 01-2320-6350-RSTR 22,620.00 01-2320-6350-TRAM 250.56 • 01-2320-6370 -----M 702.00- • 55,493.06 • c.z • A110608 WELD CHILD CARE NETWORK ST0489 21-6570-6356-9 2 ,500.00 • • 2 ,500.00 • 41 A110609 WELD COUNTY BUILDING INSP 411 25-9071-6397-GAL 112.00 • - 112.00 • • A110610 WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPT 55 25-9071-6397-GAL 125.00 . 125.00 • .- 41 A110611 WESTLAW PUBLISHING CO 69328 01-1012-6356 256. 16 • 01-1123-6530 ------- 795687- p 1 ,052.03 41 • 41 • • At l 41 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE S 05/09/09 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE S 9 • AS OF = 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER HUMBER FD DEPT O8J PAOJ AMOUNT • • A110612 WINS 001069 21-6760-6358-8 4,867.44 • 4'867.4♦ • • --- • FINAL TOTAL L 940676. 69 • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • I I I I I • I ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DACE I 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : l0 • i AS OF : 05/09/89 • o THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED UN THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 9 • AND • • DATED 05/09/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT I_ 94;676_69______. • DATED THIS 10 D Y O _ 9a2 19 _89_. It ID DIRECTOR F FIN CE AND [MINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10 OAT OF !2Y_ 19_ 89 _. • • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:My Cornmisson Expires June 8, 1990 • • • _1,~ l_4,. _ .,--,� -NOTARY POBL`1C • • WEy THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY. COLORADO, HEREBY • ( APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • • THE ___CJyrlL FUND - TOTALING $ 94.,676.69 • DATED THIS _ZQ___ DAY OF __ lity _- 19 _et. ID `f ,, • • COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • ID ) 1/ DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • ,,, - .."..-, ^_ _ 0 MEMBER MEMBER ID /Emq - - - -- -- ------ • ///// MEMBER MEMBER • • • o • • ID RI o ID ,i • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : l AS OF : 05/09/89 41 ID WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT ID • 5829774 TILLIE ALVAREZ 12-4449-6710-D15 6.00 • 6.00 ID • 5829775 MARIA ALEJANDRO 12-4449-6710-018 50.00 e • 50.00 • • 5829776 MARY F ALLEN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829777 TILLIE ALVAREZ 1244496710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 Ill s • 5829778 VIRGINIA ALVAREZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 III • 5829779 BERTHA ARCHULETA 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 ` 50.00 • =_ 5829780 MARY ARCHULETA 12-4449-6710-DIS 43.75 • 43.75 • • 5829781 JUDY ARGUELLO 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829782 LONNIE ARGUELLO 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 . 50.00 ill • 5829783 ROXANNE ARMENDARLZ 12-4449-6710-0I5 50.00 • • • • • • • e . WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : a • AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT Ill • • 5629783 ROXANNE ARMENDARII 50.00 • s- • S629784 DEBBIE J BAKER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 $829785 MARIA L BAKER 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5629786 VALINDA BALMER 12-4449-6710-D1S 50.00 • • 50.00 = • • 5829787 LISA A BARRIENTOS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829788 JULIE A BENAVIDEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829789 ROSALIE BENAVIDEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 0 • 50.00 • • 5829790 ALICE BLAIR 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50 .00 • • S629791 LYNDA L BLANCHARD 12-4449-6710-DIS 50 .00 ID 50.00 • • 5829792 DAWNELLE BLANDIN 12-.444967100015 50.00 • • 50.00 • • • • 41 I r nww� • s - • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/69 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE a 3 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • ID 582979) KAREN M BORLAND 12-4449-6710-0I5 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829794 BETTY J BREAKER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50 .00 • • 50.00 • s • 5829795 SHEREOA R BROWN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50 .00 ID 50.00 • _ --- • S829796 EVELYN BRYANT 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • ___ • 5829797 OOMITILA L CARRISALES 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 . • 5829798 AMADA CARRIZALES 12-4449-6710-DIS 40,00 • 40.00 • __ ID 5829799 WCDSS-RECOVERY 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829800 ANNA CHAIREZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829801 PATRICIA A CHICK 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 II Ill S629802 DEBRA S COLEMAN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • s • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 IP WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • s S829802 DEBRA S COLEMAN 50.00 _ : • • 5829804 MARIA E COLIN 12-4449-6710-OI5 40.00 • 40.00 • • $829804 EDNA CONTRERAZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50 .00 • 50. 00- • • S629805 LORRAINE L COX 124449-.-6710-.01S 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829806 VERA U CROOKS 12-4449-6710-DIS - 50.00 • 50.00 • -_--_ • ! 5829807 JOANN G CRUZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829808 THERESA E DOUGHERTY 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829809 JOAN E ESTREICH I2-4449-6710-DIS ---50 00- • 50.00 • • S829810 LESLIE A FARLEY 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829811 LOUISE J FOLKS 12-4449-6710-DI5 50.00 • • 50.00 • • • I • • ID s • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : S ID AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT II NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT O8J PROJ AMOUNT • • $829812 SHERRY FOUST 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829813 GLENDA S FOX 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 II • _ 50.00 • • 582981♦ CARLA J FRANCIS 12-4449-6710-DIS --------- 50_00- • 50.00 • ID S829815 BENITA FUENTES 12-4449-6710-0I5 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829816 MARY L GALLEGOS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829817 AURORA GARCIA 12-4449-6710-DIS ---------25.00- • 25. 00 • • $829818 LINDA R GARCIA 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829819 WANDA GARRETT 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • S829820 BETTY J GERBER 12-4449-67L0-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829821 MICHELE M GLANOT 12-4449-6710-DLS 50.00 • ID • II . 4I ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 AS OF : 05/09/89 S WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • • 5829821 MICHELE M GLANOT 50.00- . • 5829822 DEBORAH S GORGE 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829823 ANGLE A GRIEGO 12-4449-6710-DI5 50.00 • 50.00 II • 5829824 MARILYN R GUTIERREZ 12-4449-6710-015 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829825 SUSAN K HALEY 12-4449-6710-DI5 50.00 . 50.00 • • S829826 DIANA HART 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829821 WANDA L HARVEY 12-4449-6710-015 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829828 CHARLOTTE HENSON 12-4449-6710-DI5 50.00 • 50.00 • S . 5829829 JUANITA HERNANDEZ 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • • 50.00 • 5829830 OLIVIA HERNANDEZ 12-4449-6710-D1S 50.00 • • 50.00 • • • t ' ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 41 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OSJ PROJ AMOUNT • • S829831 REBECCA HERNANDEL 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 • 50.00 41 _z • 5829832 EVA A HERRMANN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • - 50. 00 • • 5829833 PEGGY S HUPP 12-4449-6710-0IS 50.00 • 50. 00 • • 5829834 DIANE B JARAMILLO 12-►4►9-6710-915 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829835 PAMELA J JAW 12-►449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 41 50.00 • . S829836 ROSALBA JIMENEZ I2-4449-6710-DTS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829837 YV0NNE L JONES 12-4449-6710-0IS 50 .00 • 50.00 • • S829838 BRENDA C KING 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 i • 50.00 • • 5829839 CYNTHIA G KINGSTON 12-4449-6710-0IS - 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829840 WCDSS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • • • ID • wan 41 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 . - WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 AS OF : 05/09/89 i • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 4I ID • 5829840 WCDSS 50.00ill • 5829841 TERRI L KINSEY I2-4449-6710-DIS - 50.00 ID 50.00 • __== e 5829842 SHELLEY KOHLERT 12-4449-6710-D1S 50.00 ID ID 50.00 s==c= • • 5829843 TERESA R LANDRY 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • =c • S829844 LORI LECHUGA 12-4449-6710-DIS -50.00_ • 50.00 ID ID 5829845 BARBARA LINK 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • O 4 5829846 DIANA LOBATO 12-4449-6710-OI5 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829847 MARSHA L LOOS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 . 50.00 • • 5829848 GENEVA LOPEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 30.00 • w 30.00 • • 5829849 MARY A LOPEZ 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • 50.00 • • O 41 41 , ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE ; 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT p • • 5829850 ROBERTA LOPEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 16.00 • • ---16.00 • S829851 GRACIELA LOYA 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • S829852 CAROL LUNA 12-4449-6710-013 50.00 • 50.00 • -.. • S829853 ANITA K LUTZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829854 THERESA MABRY 12-4449-671O-D1S 50.00 • • 50.00 • • S829855 NANCY J MACIAS 12-4449-6710-DIS ---50.00- • 50. 00 • • 5829856 JANICE MARTIN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829857 ALICE L MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829858 BEVERLY A MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • --- • 5829859 CELIA M MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-0IS 50.00 • • • • • • i 41 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • 0 • 5829859 CELIA M MARTINEZ 50.00 . • $829860 DARLENE K MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 ID 50. 00 • 0 5829861 GLENDA MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-015 50.00 50.00 • $829862 GUADALUPE MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • - 50.00 0 • 582986J MARIE 8 MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 . 50.00 • • 5829864 MARIA L MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 40.00 0 40.00 e • 5829865 DONITA J MAY 12-4449-6710-015 50.00 • 0 50.00 • • 5829866 DIANA L MEYER 12-4449-671O-DIS ---------5O.OO- • 50.00 5829867 BERNADINE MEZA 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829868 ROBERTA L MILLER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • ID • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : It AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • 5829869 SHIRLEY A MILLER I2-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50800 • • 5829870 BARBARA A MITCHELL 12-4449-6710-DIS 50800 • • 50.00 s= • • 5629871 DEBORAH MITCHELL 12-4449-6710--DIS 50.00 • 50800 41 • 5829872 RACHEL MORALEI I2-4449-6710-DIS 50800 • 50.00 • s • 5829873 SUZANNE A MULLER 12-4449-6710-D15 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829874 SHEILA G NICHOLS 12-4449-67L0-015 50.00- • 50800 • • 5829875 LINDA OCANAS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50. 00 • so.00 • • S829876 SALLY A ORR 12-4449^6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50. 00^ • • 5829877 ROSALIE ORTEGA 12-4449-6710-DIS ---------50-.00- • 50.00 • • 5829878 LEASA A OSORIO 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • • Si • 0 • WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 12 AS OF : 05/09/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 41 • • 5829878 LEASA A OSORIO 50.00 . • 5829879 DEBORAH K PAGE 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 • 50.00 41 • S829880 JUANITA PEREZ 12-4449-6710-0[S 30.00 41 -30.00 • • 41 $829881 MARLENE PEREZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829882 THERESA PEREZ 12-4449-6710-D15 50.00 . 50.00 • • S829883 LUPE C PINCH 12-44496710-DIS 50. 00 • 50.00 • • e SO29864 AMELIA POLVON 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • x. • $829885 PEARL POST 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 O 5829886 WCDSS 12-4449-6710-D[S 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829887 MARY J RAMOS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 w • 50.00 • 41 • IP • ID IIILI 41 WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 13 41 AS OF ; 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 41 • $629888 LORRAINE RECTO 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 41 • S829889 DEBRA A REITZ 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • 50.00 • x • S629890 FRANCES A RILEY 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829891 DOLORES RIZO 12-4449-6710-D15 50 .00 • 50.00 • • 5829892 DONNA A ROBBINS 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00 • • 50.00 • • 5829894 GENEVA M ROCCO 12-4449-6710-DIS 50. 00 • 50.00 • • 5829894 NORA RODRIGUEZ 12.-4449--65710-0IS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829895 NORA RODRIGUEZ 12-4449-6710-Di5 50.00 41 • 50.00 • • 5829890 GERALDINE 8 ROMERO 12-4449-6710-01S 50.00II 50.00 41 • 5829897 CARMEN RUBIO 12-4449-6710-0IS 50.00 Ilk • • • ID • ID IDy • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 14 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT ID ID • 5829897 CARMEN RUBIO 50.00 • ¢c=z • S829898 THERESA SALAZAR 12-4449-6710-015 48 .00 • 48.00 ill • 5829899 MARIA ELENA SANCHEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829900 JOYCE B SANDOVAL 12-4449-6710-D1S 50.00 • _ s 50.00 • • 5829901 NORA G SANTOS 12-4449-6710DIS 50.00 • 50.00 ID • S829902 VERONICA R SANTOS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • $829903 CHERYL L SCHAFFER 12-4449-6710-DI5 25.00 • • 25.00 • • 5829904 TERESA A SCHMIUT 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 III 50.00 • ID 5829905 ESEQUIEL SEPEDA 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • S829906 KATHERINE L SLACK 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • - IP 4I • • ID 4I 0 WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE 05/09/89 . WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 15 AS OF : 05/09/89 0 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT 0 NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT I0 • S829907 CAROL J SMITH 12-4449-6710-015 50.00 0 50.00 0 .=___ 0 5829908 BETTY A SOLIS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 0 50.00- 0 0 5829909 DIANE SPARKS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 0 0 5829910 JANICE SPEAKER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50 .00 0 50. 00 0 S829911 SANDRA L STAUFFER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 0 0 50.00 0 • $829912 VICKI L STEPHENS 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 . 50.00 0 S829913 JANICE K SWANSON 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 0 -------'-50.00 • 0 5829914 PATSY VARELA 12-4449-6710-Of5 50.00 0 0 50.00 0 0 5829915 SHARON J SHOSTROM 12-4449-6710-DIS ---------50 00- • 50.00 0 0 5829916 MARY S SILVA 12-4449-6710-DIS 25.00 0 • ' 0 0 S • ./ ID . WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : OS/09/80 40 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 16 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • • 5829916 MARY S SILVA 25.00 • • $829917 MARLENE VARGAS 12-4449-6710-DIS _ 50.00 . 50 .00 • • $829918 CATALINA VAS4UEZ 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50 .00 • • S829919 EOUBIJEN V VENEGAS 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 • • 50.00 ii • S829920 ROSE M VIALPANDO 12-4449-6710-015 40.00 • 40.00 ID • 5829921 LUCY f VIEYRA 12-4449-6710-D1S 50.00 • 50.00 • ' • • 5829922 ELIZABETH A VIGIL 12-4449-6710-OIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829923 ISABEL VILLEGAS 12-4449-6710-015 50 .00 • 50.00 • • 5829924 DOROTHY M WALKER 12-4449-6710-015 50 .00 • 50.00 • • S829925 LORELEI WAREHIME 12-4449-43710015 50 .00 • • 50.00 • • • IP 4, l . Ill 4, • WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 17 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • S829926 TAMMY K WAREHIME 12-4449-6710-0I5 50.00 • • 50.00 S • • 5829927 LEE A WEBER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829928 DONNA WEBSTER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829929 MARGARET A WEEDMAN 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • 5829930 SANDRA K WEIDENKELLER 12-4449-6710-DIS 50.00 • • 50.00 • • S829931 LAUREL S WILLIAMS 12-4449-6710-0I5 50.00 • 50.00 • • 5829932 AUANSON MORTUARY 12-4431-6396-BUR 750.00 • 750.00 • • 5829933 CITY OF GREELEY-FINANCE 12-4431-6710-GAKI 80.25 • • 80.2541 • 5829934 OEJOHN INC 12-443t-6710-GAKI 196.00 • 196.00 • • 5829935 EATON DRUG STORE 12-4431-6712-GADG 35.96 • • • • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/04/69 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 18 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 41 • • 5829935 EATON DRUG STORE 35.96 41 • 5829936 FRANCIE GALIGER 12-4431-b710-GAKI - 200.00_ 41 200.00 - $ • S829937 GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC 12-4431-6710-GAKI 69 .00 • 69.00 • • $829938 OSCO DRUG 12-4431-6712-GADG 12.89 411 . 12.89 • • 5829939 PUBLIC SERVICE CO 12-4431-6710-GAKI 111 56- • 111 .56 41 41 i S82994O H.C. SHANNON 12-4431-6710-GAKI 200.00 41 200.00 • -- __ • 5829941 STODDARD FUNERAL HOME 12-4431-6396-8UR 20016.00 • • 20016.00 41 • 5829942 SUPER SAVER DRUG 12-4431-6712-GADG ---------74 45- 41 74.45 5829943 TANAGER MANAGEMENT 12-4431-6710-GAKI 170 .00 • 170.00 • • 5829944 WELD CNTY DENTAL SOCIETY 12-4431-6351-GADN 680.00 • • 680.00 • 41 • - 0 • S WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 19 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT 41 41 $829945 A ROMANS PLACE 12-4431-6357-GAOV 2 ,910.00 ® 20910.00 • • $829946 WCUSS-IMPREST 12-4449-6710-CSOC 267.00 • • 267.00 • • $829947 RUDY SALAZAR 12-4449-6710-CSOC 269.16 • I 269. 16 41 41 $829948 LEDIA MARTINEZ ALANIZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 65.50 • 65. 50 • • S829949 REBECCA ATENCIO 12-4449-6710-CSOC 166.84 • • 166.84 • • 5829950 RAMONA BARCENAS 12-4449-6710-CSOC 18.00 • 18.00 • s 5829951 MCDSS-IMPREST I2-4449-6710-CSOC JOO.00 • • 300.00 • 5829952 JOLINDA KAY BREWER I2-4449-6710-CSOC 46. 15 • • 46. 15 • • $829953 BILLIE K DIGREGORID 12-4449-6710-CSUC 100.00 • 100.00 Ii • 5829954 DOROTHY JEAN EVIG 12-4449-6710-CSOC 63.50 41 41 41 41 1 I I I I I I .I I I - • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 20 AS OF : 05/09/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • • 5829954 DOROTHY JEAN EVIG 63. 50 • • S829955 WCDSS-IMPREST 12-4449-6710-CSOC 37 .50 • 37 .50 ID • 5829956 WCDSS-IMPREST 12-4449-6710-CSOC 250.00 • 250.00 • ____ • 5829957 WCDSS-IMPREST 12-4449-6710-CSOC 362.00 • • 362.00 . • 5829958 MARGARET MARTINEZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 65.00 • 65.00 • -- • 5829959 BERTHA MONTOYA 12-4449-6710-CSOC 200.00 S 200.00 • • 5829960 WCDSS-IMPREST 12-4449-6710-CSOC 250.00 ill • 250.00 ID • S829961 DEBORAH KAY PAGE 12-4449-6710-CSOC 80.00 . 80.00 • S829962 DIANA RIVERS 12-4449-6710-CSOC 75.00 ill 75.00 • ID 5829963 MILDRED E RUIZ 12-4449-6710-CSOC 106.25 ID • 106.25 . • S . • • • ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 21 AS OF : 05/09/89 • MARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER MARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER fD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • s $82996♦ EVELYN MARIE SMITH 12-4449-6710-CSOC 120.00 120.00 41 • 5829965 KIMBERLY LYNN VIA 12-4449-6710-CSOC 68.39 • • 68.39 • . 5829966 SUSAN ELLEN ZEN 12-4449-6710-CSOC 41 .84_ • 41 .84 • • S829967 ANITA CAROL BURROWS 12-4449-6710-CSOC 200.00 • 200.00 • • • FINAL TOTAL : 186316.99 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . i • 4, ill • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/09/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 22 AS OF : O5/09/d9 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 21 0 AND • • DATED 0$/09/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT 1 18,316.99 • • DATED THI 10 A OF _ hbzy 19 89 __. • • __ �_ • DIRE NCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10 DAY OF May t9_ 8°-• • • MY COMMISSION E%PIRESTS.L2yuum_En2i€,dy=c&,jQ94 . • ill CO NOTARY LIC • NEs THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • )APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • • THE __BQq _aauu.caz FUND - TOTALING 1___j 3u¢_Q9 • DATED THIS ___jjL_ DAY OF 4 19 —et. • kfitwia e.,i • • COUNT CLERTe K AND RECORDER BY • • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN • 6- • MEM ER MEMBER • � • • �4'EI C MEMBER MEMBER • • • • • • • 5 / / o /s ? r . r 1r` STATE OF COLORADO BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS .. •" '''•' 4 Department of Natural Resources 620 Centennial Building " ,\ OF cod 1313 Sherman St., Denver,Colorado 80203 • (303) 866-3454 -n -,\ • - i S' 'pq Sillkee'her May 4, 1989 4. * /876 Commissioners Board of County Commissioners Weld County ROWENA ROGERS P O Box 758 JO C. CARPENTER JOHN S. VOWS III Greeley, CO 80632 Re: Colorado Mining Lease No. UR 3110 weld County, Colorado Gentlemen: This Board has issued the captioned lease on the lands shown on the attached copy. The surface lessees of these lands are so notified by copy of this letter and the attached. Before the mineral lessee begins any mining operation, a bond must be furnished to protect the surface lessee or owner from personal property loss and from land damage. Lessee is subject to all state and federal laws, including the rules and regulations as set forth by the Colorado Division of Mines and the State Division of Mined Land Reclamation. The Board requests the full cooperation of all parties concerned, and also asks that this office be notified at your earliest convenience if any problems arise out of this or if you have any questions whatever. Thank you. Sincerreely, S L. R. Ladwig Minerals Director LRL/jc Att. cc: Mineral Lessee Surface Lessees: State Land Appraiser, Bud Clemons Crow Valley Livestock Coo Div. of Mined Land Reclamation A R & C L De Porter Division of Mines Prange Ranch Division of Wildlife James E Morrison Bureau of Land Management M J Diehl & Sons Inc. *N) U.S. Forest Service Meadow Springs Grazing ck >N7-10' 4� State Archaeologist Lazy u Grazing Assn ned ' Dennis DeVore \V ANTHONY SABATINI LR. LADWIG RUTH J. RARY Administrator Minerals Director Deputy Register SLB 256 Rev. 4/89 lA STATE OF COLORADO m.S L'.; !stlisktp2pr LAND COMMISSIONERS Department of Natural Resources CAL:-(1; Denver, Colorado TO nr 207.7) f nL URANIUM SOLUTION MINING IN-SITU LEASE NO. UR 3110 THIS MINING LEASE, Made in duplicate and entered into this 3rd day of April , 19 89 , by and between the State of Colorado, acting through its STATE BOARD OF LAND COMMISSIONERS, hereinafter referred to as Lessor, and Ferret Exploration Company. Inc. 1800 Glenarm P1. , Ste 300, Denver. CO 80202 hereinafter referred to as Lessee: WITNESSETH: Lessor, for and in consideration of the sum of two thousand five hundred fifty-four and 75/100 Dollars (S 2.554.75 ) , receipt of which is hereby acknowledged as payment of the filing fee in the amount of $ 57.75 , first year's rent in the amount of S 2,497.00 , and a bonus in the amount of S -0- , and in further consideration of Lessee's agreement to pay one and no/100 Dollar(s) ($ 1.00 ) per acre annually as rental in advance of the anniversary date of this lease so long as said lease shall remain in effect; and in further consideration of the terms, conditions and agreements herein and of the payments of annual rentals and royalties reserved herein, to be kept and performed by Lessee, its successors and assigns, does hereby lease to Lessee the right and privilege of exploring and prospecting for, and mining of and takire, of uranium and all other radioactive minerals by in-situ mining methods only from the lands herein described, situated in the County of Weld State of Colorado, to wit: ACRES SUBDIVISION SEC.TWP.RGE. PATENTS 320.00 SW/4; S/2NW/4; W/2SE/4 28- 9N-63W None 80.00 SE/4NE/4; NE/4SE/4 14- 9N-64W 7524 40.00 SW/4NE/4 32-I0N-66W 5783 600.00 N/2; N/2SW/4; SE/4SW/4; SE/4 16-.ON-67W 4379,4380, 4894 80.00 S/2SW/4 22-10N-67W 6686 520.00 E/2; SW/4NW/4; SW/4 28-10N-67W None 640.00 All 36-10N-67W 4554,4768, 4770 216.36 S/2 Lot 1; Lot 2; SE/4SW/4; 30-11N-67W None S/2SE/4 FUND: School containing 2.496.' acres, more ar less, together with the right to use as much of th. .,,rface as may be reasonably required in the exercise of the right to in-situ solution mine, including the right to reasonable ingress and egress; the right to construct buildings, roads, powerlines, pipelines, and other improvements as may be reasonably necessary in the mining and removal of said minerals; subject, however, to all existing easements and rights-of-way of third parties, and the rights of surface lessees and surface patentees, and further subject to the terms, conditions and agreements set out in this lease. The above-mentioned rights may be exercised in connection with mining on other or adjacent lands only when mining on such lands is carried on in conjunction with the actual mining on the land herein leased. The above right to use state lands without mining on the lands herein leased will be at the discretion of Lessor. RESERVING, however, to the State of Colorado: A. All rights and privileges of every kind and nature, except as are herein specifically granted. B. The right to use or lease said premises or any part thereof at any time for any purpose, including the right to explore and prospect said premises, which use and leasing of said premises shall be for purposes other than and not inconsistent with the rights and privileges herein specifically granted. n WELD CO:ITV 0S8S MI -5 P,y ;2: (9 CLER'; STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WELD ) EXCLUSION ORDER Daryl L. & Mary M. Arnold Parcel R, Recorded Exemption No. 1395-24-2-RE1144, recorded March 8, 1989, at Rock 1226, Reception #2172096, being part of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. Weld County , Colorado, 9 .517 acres. We, John R. Stevens, President, and Lawrence E . Gerkin, Secretary, d- hereby certify that we are respectively the President and Secretary of the ward of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District . We further certify that, at a regular meeting of said Board, held in the office of the District at Hudson, Wed County , Colorado, on Tuesday , May 2, 1989, there were present: John R. Stevens President. James L. Sirios Director . Bruce E. Kauffman Director _ LawrenceE . Gerkin Secretary . We further certify that at said meeting of said Board of Directors, there was duly and regularly adopted by the affirmative vote of all members of said Board, a resolution of which the following is a full , true, and correct copy, towit: Jam/ r ,47# 4 "WHEREAS the following described land, towit, Parcel B, Recorded Exemption No. 1305-24-2-RE1144, recorded March 8, 1989, at Book 1226, Reception #2172896, being part of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County , Colorado, 9 .517 acres, that has heretofore been deemed and considered to have been included in and a part of the Henrylyn Irrigation District and subject to irrigation district taxes for said District: and WHEREAS Daryl L. & Mary M. Arnold, owners of the above described land, have filed written petition, duly signed and verified by said petitioners, .setting forth, among other things, that said land by reasons of location, cannot be practically irrigated from the present works of the District, and therefore should be excluded, and that the owners of said land, prior to the filing of said petition, paid tc the County Treasurer of Weld County all taxes due, other than taxes for Irrigation District purposes of said District, together with such penalties or fees a5 were chargeable theron, or, that if such taxes have not already been paid, the said petitioner shall pay said taxes before this resolution shall take effect; and WHEREAS said petition has been duly set for hearing upon this day , and that the notice of the filing of said petition, and the time and place at which the said Board of Directors would hear the same, and take evidence in support thereof , and take action thereon, has been duly published and given as provided by law, and the proof therof filed with this Board, and that the said petition, having at the said time and place duly come to be heard before, and has been heard by, this Board; and WHEREAS the Board having found and decided, as a matter of fact, that the allegations of the petition were sustained by competent and material evidence, and that the said land ought to be excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the payment of any outstanding and unpaid assessments for taxes for irrigation district purposes of said District. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, by the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, that, for the reasons in said petition stated and proven as aforesaid, that the hereinabove land be, and it is, hereby excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the Payment of any unpaid assessments of tax levies for Irrigation District purposes of said District, and the same be in all things abated and discharged, and that the said land is not now subject to assessment or taxation for the purposes of said District, and that the inclusion of said land in said District be, and the same is, hereby rescinded and cancelled, and that a copy of this resolution, certified by the President and Secretary of this Board, be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Assessor, of Weld County , Colorado, notifying them of the action taken by this Board, and that said land has been excluded from said • District and it is not now subject to taxation for Irrigation District purposes of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, and that the County Assessor be directed to omit said land from any assessment made, or to be made by him for Irrigation District purposes of said District, and also that a certified copy of this resolution be filed for record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County, Colorado . " IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have hereunto subscribed our names and affixed the seal of the District, this the ___2nd-__ day of Mme' , 1589 A. D. / resident. • ATTEST: Secretary . STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WELD EXCLUSION ORDER Rob A. Pippin & Elizabeth V. Starks A parcel of land being part of Lot ' B' of Recorded Exemption Number 1305-26-1-RE776 as recorded August 13, 1985, in Book 1030 under Reception Number 02026612 of the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder , and being part of the NE1/4 of Section 26, Township 2 North, Range 64 West of the 6th F.M. , Weld County, Colorado, excluding a parcel of ground more oart.icular.ly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast Corner of said Section 26; Thence South along the East line of said Section 26, .5=.6. 6 feet; Thence West parallel to the North line of said NE1/4, .536.6 feet; Thence North parallel to the East line of said NE1/4, 586. 6 feet to a point on the North line of said NE1/4; Thence. East along said North line, 586.6 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land contains 7 .9 acres, more or less and is subject to any rights-of-way or other easements as granted or reserved by instruments of record as are now existing on said described parcel of land, 80.60 acres. We, John R. Stevens, President, and Lawrence E . Gerkin, Secretary , do hereby certify that we are respectively the President and Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District . We further certify that, at a regular meeting of said Board, held in the office of the District at Hudson, Weld County, Colorado, c'n Tuesday, May 2, 1989, ₹.here were present: John R. Stevens President. James L. Sirios Director . Bruce E. Kauffman Director . Lawrence E. Gerkin Secretary . We further certify that at said meeting of said Board of Directors, there was duly and regularly adopted by the affirmative vote of all members of said Board, a resolution of which the following is a full , true, and correct copy , tawit; "WHEREAS the following described land, towit, A parcel of land being part of Lot 'B' of Recorded Exemption Number 105-2h-1-RE776 as recorded August 13, 1985, in Book 1090 under Reception Number 02020612 of the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder, and being part of the NE1/4 of Section 26, Township 2 North, Range 64 West of the 6th F .M . , Weld County , Colorado, excluding a parcel of ground more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast Corner of said Section 26; Thence South along the East line of said Section 26, 596.6 feet; Thence West parallel to the North line of said NE1/4, 586. 6 feet, Thence North parallel to the East line of said NE1/4, 586.6 feet to a point on the North line of said NEI/4; Thence East along said North line, 586.6 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described Parcel of land contains 7 .9 acres, more or less and is subject to any rights-of-way or other easements as granted or reserved by instruments of record as are now existing on said described parcel of land, 30.60 acres. , that has heretofore been deemed and considered to have been included in and a part of the Henrylyn Irrigation District and subject to irrigation district taxes for said District; and WHEREAS Rob A. Pippin & Elizabeth V. Starks, owners of the above described land, have filed written petition, duly signed and verified by said Petitioners, setting forth, among other things, that said land by reasons of location, cannot be practically irrigated from the present works of the - District, and therefore should be excluded, and that the owners of said land, prior to the filing of said petition, paid to the County Treasurer of Weld County all taxes due, other than taxes for Irrigation District Purposes of said District, together with such penalties or fees as were chargeable theron, or, that if such taxes have not already been paid, the said petitioner shall pay said taxes before this resolution shall take effect; and WHEREAS said Petition has been duly set for hearing upon this day, and that the notice of the filing of said petition, and the time and place at which the said Board of Directors would hear the same, and take evidence in support thereof , and take action thereon, has been duly published and given as provided by law, and the proof therof filed with this Board, and that the said petition, having at the said time and place duly come to be heard before, and has been heard by, this Board; and WHEREAS the Board having found and decided, as a matter of fact, that the allegations of the petition were sustained by competent and material evidence, and that the said land ought to be excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the payment of any outstanding and unpaid assessments for taxes for irrigation district purposes of said District.. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, by the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, that, for the reasons in said petition stated and proven as aforesaid, that the hereinabove land be, and it is, hereby excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the payment of any unpaid assessments of tax levies for Irrigation District purposes of said District, and the same be in all things abated and discharged, and that the said land is not now subject to assessment or taxation for the purposes of said District, and that the inclusion of said land in said District be, and the same is, hereby rescinded and cancelled, and that a copy of this resolution, certified by the President and Secretary of this Board, be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Assessor , of Weld County , Colorado, notifying them of the action taken by this Board, and that said land has been excluded from said District and it is not now subject to taxation for Irrigation District purposes of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, and that the County Assessor be directed to omit said land from any assessment made, or to be made by him for Irrigation District purposes of said District, and also that a certified copy of this resolution be filed for record in the office of the • Clerk and Recorder of Weld County , Colorado. ,, • IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have hereunto subscribed Our names and affixed the seal of the District, this the 2nd day of May , 1989 A.D. /114;wedy F sident. ATTEST: Secretary . STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF WELD ) EXCLUSION ORDER Larry J. Mowery NE1/4NW1/4SE1/4:S1/2NW1/4SE1/4:SW1/4SE1/4 in Section 26, Township 2 North, Range 64 West in Weld County, Colorado, exc . beginning 660'S & 30'E of Cen. Section E140' S260' W140' N to Beginning, also exc . beginning 980'S & 30'E Cen. Section E140' 5200' W140' N200' to Beginning, also exc . S769' of SW1/4SE1/4 (TR12) exc . beginning at NE Corner of S1/2SW1/4SE1/4 Section 26 N300' W20' 5300' E20' to Beginning, 42.00 acres. We, John R. Stevens, President, and Lawrence E. Gerkin, Secretary, do hereby certify that we are respectively the President. and Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation. District . We further certify that, at a regular meeting of said Board, held in the office of the District at Hudson, Weld County , Colorado, on Tuesday , May 2, 195?, there were present: John R. Stevens President. James L. Sirios Director . Bruce E. Kauffman Director . Lawrence E. Gerkin Secretary . We further certify that at said meeting of said Board of Directors, there was duly and regularly adopted by the affirmative vote of all members of said Board, a resolution of which the following is a full , true, and correct copy , towit: l • "WHEREAS the following described land, towit, NE1/4NW1/43E1/4:Sl/2NW1/4 SE=1/4:SW1/43E1/4 in Section 25, Township 2 North, Range 64 West in Weld County , Colorado, exc . beginning ii60'S & 30'E. of Cen. Section E140' 3260'0' W140' N to Beginning, also exc . beginning 980'S & =,0'E C:en. Section E144' S200' N200''Ww L95 1 to Beginning, also r.'r;C . :a7F3:i of �:,W1/4SE1/4 (TR12) exc . beginning at NE Corner of S1/23W1/43E1/4 Section 26 N300' W20' 3300' E20' to Beginning, 43.0 , acres, that has heretofore been deemed and considered to have been included in and a part of the Henrylyn Irrigtion District and subject to irrigation district taxes for said District; and WHEREAS Larry J . Mowery , owner of the above described land, has filed written petition, duly signed and verified by said petitioner , setting forth, among other thins, that said land, by reasons of location, cannot be practically irrigated from the present works of the District, and therefore should be excluded, and that the owner of said land, prior to the filing of said petition, paid to the County Treasurer of Weld County all taxes due, other than taxes for Irrigation District purposes of said District., together with such penalties or fees as were chargeable theron, or , that if such taxes have not already been paid, the said petitioner shall pay said taxes before this resolution shall take effect; and ' I WHEREAS said petition has been duly set for hearing upon this day , and that the notice of the filing of said petition, and the time and place at which the said Board of Directors would hear the same, and take evidence in support thereof , and take action thereon, has been duly published and given as provided by law, and the proof therof filed with this Board, and that the said petition, having at the said time and place duly come to be heard before, and has been heard by , this Board; and WHEREAS the Board having found and decided, as a matter of fact, that the allegations of the petition were sustained by competent and material evidence, and that the said land ought to be excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the payment of any outstanding and unpaid assessments for taxes for irrigation district purposes of said District. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, by the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, that, for the reasons in said petition stated and proven as aforesaid, that the hereinabove land be, and it is, hereby excluded from the Henrylyn Irrigation District and relieved from the payment of any unpaid assessments of tax levies for Irrigation District purpo=,es of said District, and the same be in all things abated and discharged, and that the said land is not now subject to assessment or taxation for the purposes of said District, and that the inclusion of said land in said District be, and the same is, hereby rescinded and cancelled, and that a copy of this resolution, certified by the President and Secretary of this Board, be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Assessor , of Weld County , Colorado, notifying them of the action taken by this Board, and that said land has been excluded from said District and it is not now subject to taxation for Irrigation District purposes of the Henrylyn Irrigation District, and that the County Assessor be directed to omit said land from any assessment made, or to be made by him for Irrigation District purposes of said District, and also that a certified copy of this resolution be filed for record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County , Colorado. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have hereunto subscribed our names and affixed the seal of the District, this the ,.. ?ild.--,-- day of ___May_ _, 1989 A .D . 914) Pr .sident- ATTEST ; Secretary , • ■ STATE OF COLORADO) • SS . COUNTY OF WELD ) INCLUSION ORDER Marc D . & Sheri L . Sirius Beginning at the SE1/4 Corner of the NE1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 64 West, thence West along the South line of said NE1/4 to the point where the Interstate Highway 76 right-of-way intersects the South line of the NE1/4 which is the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence. East along the South line of the NE1/4 a distance of 910. 6 feet; thence North a distance of 910.6 feet to the Interstate Highway 76 right-cif-way; thence Southwest along the Interstate Highway 76 right-of-way to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; said parcel consisting of 9..517 acres, more or less. We, John R. Stevens, President, and Lawrence E. Gerkin, Secretary , do hereby certify that• we are respectively the President and Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District. We further certify that, at a regular meeting of said Board, held in the office of the District at Hudson, Weld County , Colorado, on Tuesday , May 2, 1989, there were present: John R. Stevens President. James L. Sirios Director . Bruce E . Kauffman Director . Lawrence E . Gerkin Secretary . We further certify that at said meeting of said Board of Directors, there was duly and regularly adopted by the affirmative vote of all members of said Board, a resolution of which the following is a full , true, and correct copy, tc.wit: "WHEREAS. Marc D. & Sheri L. Sirios, owners of a parcel of land beginning at the SE1/4 Corner of the NE1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 64 West, ₹.hence West along the South line of said NE1/4 to the point where the Interstate Highway 76 right-of-way intersects the South line of the NE1/4 which is the TRUE POINT of BEGINNING, thence East along the South line of the NE1/4 a distance of 910.6 feet; thence North a distance of 910.6 feet to the Interstate Highway 76 right--of-way ; thence Southwest along the Interstate Highway 76 right-of-way to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; said parcel consisting of 9. 817 acres, more or less, have filed with this Board, written petition containing all the allegations and avernments necessary by law to be contained therein, praying for the inclusion of the above described land in the Henrylyn Irrigation District; and WHEREAS said petition has been duly set for hearing upon this day , and the notice of the filing of said petition, and time and place at which the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District would hear the same and take evidence in support thereof , and take action thereon, has been duly published as provided by law, and the proof thereof filed with this Board, and the petition, having at said time and place duly come to be heard before, and has been heard by , this Board; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration of the evidence before it, the Board did then and there find and determine that it was for the best interest of the District to include said land in, and make same a part of , said District. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, by the Board of Directors of The Henrylyn Irrigation District, that for the reason in said petition stated and proven, as aforesaid, that the prayer of the petition for the inclusion of land of said Marc D. & Sheri L . Sirios, be, and the same is, hereby allowed and granted and that the said hereinabove described land be, and the same is, hereby included in and made a part of the Henrylyn Irrigation district, subject to the payment of all assessments or tax levies for the irrigation district purposes of said District, and that in case no protest in writing be filed within thirty days of date, signed by a majority of the legally qualified electors of said District, that a copy of this resolution certified by the President and the Secretary of this Board, shall be tiled for record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County , Colorado, and also there shall be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Assessor of Weld County , Colorado, each a copy of this order, notifying them of the action taken by this Board and that said land has been included in said District, and that the County Assessor be directed to include said land in any assessment to be made by him for irrigation district purposes of said District. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto subscribed our names and affixed the seal of the District, this __ 211d_____ day of _—.MAX,__,----___--, 1';;a_1 A. D. i "dr 4/7 ,- 4211/) _ r silent. ATTEST : Secretary . • STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF WELD ) INCLUSION ORDER Larry Mowery A Parcel of land being the SW1/4NE1/4 and part of the S1/2NW1/4 of Section 5, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P . M . , Weld County Colorado, consisting of 53 . 5 acres, more or less (See Attached Legal Description - East Parcel ) and a parcel of land being part of the SW1/4 and part of the S1/2NW1/4 of Section 5, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. , Weld County , Colorado, consisting of 70. 1 acres, more or less (See attached Legal Description - West Parcel ) for a total of 12_x.6 acres. We , John R . Stevens, President, and Lawrence E . Gerkin, Secretary, do hereby certify that we are respectively the President and Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District . We further certify that, at a regular meeting of said Board, held in the office of the District at Hudson, Weld County , Colorado, on Tuesday , May 2, 1929, t•heere were present. ; John R . Stevens President. James L . Sirios Director . Bruce E . Kauffman Director . Lawrence E . Gerkin Secretary . We further certify that at said meeting of said Board of Directors, there was duly and regularly adopted by the affirmative vote of all members of said Board, a resolution of which the following is a full , true, and correct copy , towit: a,, r 1-4 4 ... _ 7c14 123" & DAL DESCRIPTION West Parcel A parcel of land being part of the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) and part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter (51/2 NW1/4) of Section Five (5) , Township One (1) North, Range Sixty-four (64) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian <6th P.M. ) , Weld County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner (SW Cor) of said Section 5 and assuming the West line of said Section 5 as bearing North 00. 00'00" East with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto: The elevations as contained herein are relative to the following datum: The top of a concrete irrigation diversion box that bears North 00. 51.55" West a distance of 639.13 feet from the SW Cor of said Section S. The top West side of the box is an assumed elevation of 100.00. The flowline to the Northeast of said box is 96.77 feet; Thence North 02. 33'30" East, 672. 12 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of a thirty foot (30' ) Weld County Road, whose elevation is 96.72. Said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 50.45'14" East, 155.74 feet to a point whose elevation is 96.57 feet; Thence North 25. 35'17" East, 220.25 feet to a point whose elevation is 96.38 feet; Thence North 36.31 '49" East, 207.64 feet to a point whose elevation is 96. 17 feet; Thence North 43. 17'40" East, 207.41 feet to a point whose elevation is 95 .96 feet; Thence North 44. 21 ' 17" East, 201 .87 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.76 feet; Thence North 57. 14'42" East. 197.68 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.56 feet; Thence North 74.36'55" East, 205.51 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.35 feet; Thence North 72. 52'08" East, 193.99 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.16 feet; Thence North 18. 39'09" East, 192.21 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.94 feat; Thence North 12.58'51" East, 189.92 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.76 feet; Thence North 01.29'26" East, 183.27 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.56 feet; Thence North 11. 12.53" East, 193.95 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.37 feet; Thence North 24. 33'59" East, 179.18 feet to a point whose elevation is 94. 15 feet; 1 LL ry? C 0 0 A Thence North 21. 24'09" East, 197.80 feet to a point whose elevation is 93.96 feet; Thence North 13. 13'58" West, 201 .42 feet to a point whose elevation is 93.30 feet; Thence North 22. 51 '06" West, 199.02 feet to a point whose elevation is 92.80 feet; Thence North 23. 54' 11" West, 204.72 feet to a point whose elevation is 91.03 feet; Thence North 09. 32'27" West, 186. 95 feet to a point whose elevation is 90.40 feet; Thence North 40. 25'46" West, 183.13 feet to a point whose elevation is 89.51 feet; Thence North 88" 38'01" West, 187.83 feet to a point whose elevation is 89.19 feet; Thence North 88. 41 '45" West, 188.30 feet to a point whose elevation is 88.45 feet; Thence North 88.44'42• West, 187. 16 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.43 feet; Thence North 72. 17'33" West, 180.09 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.32 feet; Thence North 73.41 '30" West, 191.55 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.23 feet; Thence North 81. 04' 53" West. 193.47 feet to a point whose elevation is 84.09 feet. Said point being on the Easterly right-of-way line of a thirty foot (30' ) Weld County Road; Thence South 00.00'00" East along said Easterly right-of-way line, 3107. 52 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land contains 70. 16 acres, more or less. 2 r LEGAL DESCRIPTION East Parcel A parcel of land being the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SW1/4 NE1/4) and part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter (S1/2 NW1/4) of Section Five (5) , Township One (1) North, Range Sixty-four (64) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian (6th P.M. ) , Weld County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner (SW Cot) of said Section 5 and assuming the West line of said Section 5 as bearing North 00. 00'00" East with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto: The elevations as contained herein are relative to the following datum: The top of a concrete irrigation diversion box that bears North 00. 51 '55" West a distance of 639. 13 feet from the SW Cor of said Section 5. The top West side of the box is an assumed elevation of 100.00. Thence North 18. 34'32" East, 3962.65 feet to the centerline of a concrete lined irrigation ditch. The elevation of said centerline at this point is 88.48 feet; Thence North 40.05'21" East, 172.18 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.41 feet. Said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of said parcel description; Thence South 21. 03'07" East, 195.91 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.21 feet; Thence South 40.41 '40" East, 197.54 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.01 feet; Thence South 55. 40'51" East, 186.93 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.80 feet; Thence South 67. 16'29" East, 188.55 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.60 feet; Thence South 51. 42'01" East, 186. 13 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.41 feet; Thence South Sl" 24'04" East, 188.35 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.23 feet; Thence South 60. 38'28" East, 189.04 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.05 feet; Thence South 75. 40'04" East, 184.69 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.82 feet; Thence North 79.06'46" Eaat, 187.55 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.62 feet; Thence South 65. 29'26" East, 182.36 feet to a point whose elevation is 85,42 feet; Thence South 57. 32'09" East, 192.84 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.22 feet; 3 • Thence South 44. 13'20" East, 186.19 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.02 feet: Thence South 45.43.58" East, 208.11 feet more or less, to a point on the South line of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence South 89' 04'25" East, 636. 12 feet more or less, to the Southeast Corner (SE Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 00. 05'55 West, 1316.29 feet to the Northeast Corner (NE Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 89. 02'21 West, 1321 .22 feet to the Northwest Corner (NW Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 89. 02'06" West along the North line of the 51/2 NW1/4, 1286.48 feet; Thence South 21. 03'07" East, 48.52 feet more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land contains 53.52 acres, more or less. 4 • "WHEREAS, Larry Mowery , owner c.f a parcel of land being the SW1/4NE1/4 and part of the S1/2NW1/4 of Section 5, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P . M . , Weld County , Colorado., consisting of 53 . 5 acres, more or less (See attached Legal Description - East Parcel ) and a parcel of land being part of the SW1/4 and part of the S1/2NW1/4 of Section S, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th F. M. , Weld County , Colorado, consisting of 70 . 1 acres, more Cr less (See attached Legal Description - West Parcel ) for a total of 123.6 acres, has filed with this Board, written petition containing all the allegations and avernments necessary by law to be contained therein, praying for the inclusion of the above described land in the Henrylyn Irrigation District; and WHEREAS said petition has been duly set for hearing upon this day , and the notice of ₹.he filing of said petition, and time and place at which the Board of Directors of the Henrylyn Irrigation District would hear the same and take evidence in support thereof , and take action thereon, has been duly published as provided by law, and the proof thereof filed with this Board, and the petition, having at said time and place duly come to be heard before, and has been heard by , this Board; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration of the evidence before it, the Board did then and there find and determine that it was for the best interest of the District to include said land in, and make same a part of , said District . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, by the Board of Directors of The Henrylyn Irrigation District, that for the reason in said petition stated and proven, as aforesaid, that the prayer of the petition for the inclusion of land of said Larry Mowery be, and the same is, hereby allowed and granted and that the said hereinabove described land be, and the same is, hereby included in and made a part of the Henrylyn Irrigation district, subject to the payment of all assessments or tax levies for the irrigation district" purposes of said District, and that in case no protest in writing be filed within thirty days of date, signed by a majority of the legally qualified electors of said District, that a copy of this resolution, certified by the President and the Secretary of this Board, shall be filed for record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County , Colorado, and also there shall be delivered to the Board of County Commissioners and the County Assessor of Weld County , Colorado, each a copy c.f this order, notifying them of the action taken by this Board and that said land has been included in said District, and that the County Assessor be directed to include said land in any assessment to be made by him for irrigation district purposes of said District . " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto subscribed our names and affixed the seal of the District, this ._._._bid.._.-_ day of ._•__.NmX , 1'989 A. D. gde-feetelic) Pie ident. ATTEST ; Secretary . f4./ `, . '1 .� . • ']c^I4 ' /23 ' e LEGAL DESCRIPTION West Parcel A parcel of land being part of the Southwest Quarter (SW1/4) and part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter (S1/2 NW1/4) of Section Five (5) , Township One (1) North, Range Sixty-four (64) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian (6th P.M. ) , Weld County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner (SW Cor) of said Section 5 and assuming the West line of said Section 5 as bearing North 00. 00'00" East with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto: The elevations as contained herein are relative to the following datum: The top of a concrete irrigation diversion box that Dears North 00. 51 ' 55" West a distance of 639. 13 feet from the SW Cor of said Section S. The top West side of the box is an assumed elevation of 100.00. The flowline to the Northeast of said box is 96.77 feet; Thence North 02. 33'30" East, 672. 12 feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of a thirty foot (30' ) Weld County Road, whose elevation is 96.72. Said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 50. 45'14" East, 155.74 feet to a point whose elevation is 96.57 feet; Thence North 25.35'17" East, 220.25 feet to a point whose elevation is 96.38 feet; Thence North 36.31 '49" East, 207.64 feet to a point whose elevation is 96. 17 feet; Thence North 43. 17'40" East, 207.41 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.96 feet; Thence North 44"21 '17" East, 202 .87 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.76 feet; Thence North 57. 14'42" East, 197.68 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.56 feet; Thence North 74. 36'55" East, 205.51 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.35 feet; Thence North 72. 52'08" ' East, 193.99 feet to a point whose elevation is 95.16 feet; Thence North 18. 39'09" East, 192.21 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.94 feet; Thence North 12. 58'51" East, 189.92 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.76 feet; Thence North 01. 29'26" East, 183.27 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.56 feet; Thence North 11. 12'53" East, 193.95 feet to a point whose elevation is 94.37 feet; Thence North 24. 33'59" East, 179. 18 feet to a point whose elevation is 94. 15 feet; 1 I.(.'rst < u..( 4 Thence North 21. 24'09" East, 197.80 feet to a point whose elevation is 93.96 feet; Thence North 13. 13'58" West, 201 .42 feet to a point whose elevation is 93.30 feet; Thence North 22. 51 '06" West, 199.02 feet to a point whose elevation is 92.80 feet; Thence North 23. 54' 11" West, 204.72 feet to a point whose elevation is 91 .03 feet; Thence North 09. 32'27" West, 186.95 feet to a point whose elevation is 90.40 feet; Thence North 40. 25'46" West, 183. 13 feet to a point whose elevation is 89.51 feet; Thence North 88. 38'01" West, 187.83 feet to a point whose elevation is 89.19 feet; Thence North 88. 41 '45" West, 188.30 feet to a point whose elevation is 88.45 feet; Thence North 88.44'42" West, 187. 16 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.43 feet; Thence North 72. 17'33" West, 180.09 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.32 feet; Thence North 73" 41 '30" West, 191 .55 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.23 feet; Thence North 81.04'53" West, 193.47 feet to a point whose elevation is 84.09 feet. Said point being on the Easterly right-of-way line of a thirty foot (30' ) Weld County Road; Thence South 00. 00'00" East along said Easterly right-of-way line, 3107. 52 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land contains 70. 16 acres, more or less. • 2 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION East Parcel A parcel of land being the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SW1/4 NE1/4) and part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter (S1/2 NW1/4) of Section Five (5) , Township One ( 1) North, Range Sixty-four (64) Weat of the Sixth Principal Meridian (6th P.M. ) , Weld County, Colorado and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southwest Corner (SW Cor) of said Section 5 and assuming the West line of said Section 5 as bearing North 00. 00'00" East with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto: The elevations as contained herein are relative to the following datum: The top of a concrete irrigation diversion box that bears North 00. 51 '55" West a distance of 639. 13 feet from the SW Cor of said Section 5. The top West side of the box is an assumed elevation of 100.00. Thence North 18. 34'32" East, 3962.65 feet to the centerline of a concrete lined irrigation ditch. The elevation of said centerline at this point is 88.48 feet; Thence North 40.05'21" East, 172. 18 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.41 feet. Said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of said parcel description; Thence South 21. 03'07" East, 195. 91 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.21 feet; Thence South 40. 41 '40" East, 197.54 feet to a point whose elevation is 87.01 feet; Thence South 55. 40'51" East, 186.93 feet to a point whose elevation is. 86.80 feet; Thence South 67. 16'29" East, 188,55 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.60 feet; Thence South 51. 42'01" East, 186. 13 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.41 feet; Thence South 51. 24'04" East, 188.35 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.23 feet; Thence South 60. 38'28" East, 189.04 feet to a point whose elevation is 86.05 feet; Thence South 75. 40'04" East, 184.69 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.82 feet; Thence North 79. 06'46" East, 187.55 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.62 feet; Thence South 65. 29'26" East, 182.36 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.42 feet; Thence South 57. 32'09" East, 192 .84 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.22 feet; 3 4-O4,/ Lu. I Thence South 44. 13'20" East, 186. 19 feet to a point whose elevation is 85.02 feet; Thence South 45.43'58" East, 208. 11 feet more or less, to a point on the South line of said SW1/4 N£1/4; Thence South 89. 04'25" East, 636. 12 feet more or less, to the Southeast Corner (SE Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 00. 05'55 West, 1316 .29 feet to the Northeast Corner (NE Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 89. 02'21 West, 1321 .22 feet to the Northwest Corner (NW Cor) of said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence North 89. 02'06" West along the North line of the S1/2 NW1/4, 1286.48 feet; Thence South 21.03'07" East, 48.52 feet more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land contains 53.52 acres, more or less. 4 r.h,.- 7 rgnn ; ,, a STATE OF COLORADO �.uf 1" to COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH do ntlE��,y,t�,�wenue N�� 1� Cdt04Sfdo\60220 ce Phone (303) 320-6333 '1.-/JtUL:" Roy Romer Governor Thomas M.Vernon, M.D. COLORADO BOARD OP HEALTH Executive Director AGENDA May 17, 1989 • LOCATION TIME Colorado Department of Health 9:00 a.m. 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Room 412 Denver, Colorado 9:00 a.m.: 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes - April 19, 1989 3. Public Comment 4. Board Comment 9:15 a.m.: 5. Discussion: a. Proposed amendments to Regulations Pertaining to Solid Wastes-Disposal Sites and Facilities to add new section on Water Treatment Plant Sludge Disposal Facilities: Steve Orzynski, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division b. Proposed amendments to Domestic Sewage Sludge Regulations: Phil Hegeman, Water Quality Control Division 9:45 a.m.: 6. Adolescent Health Report - Update on Colorado adolescent health status; summary of findings of adolescent PATH grant; and discussion of actions being taken by various groups to improve adolescent health: Barbara Kitchen, director of CDH Adolescent Health Program, and Debra Sandau-Christopher, Department of Education 11:15 a.m.: 7. Report of the Executive Director Report on the Legislative session Legislation: Sue Ellen Quam Budget: Tom Messenger NOTE: Times stated are approximate. 41 1u•g bI-.. , STATE OF COLORADO cfr CLcr-COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 13'• TO re:�JA2ti1,04ast 77th Avenue x; `ien4er, Colorado 80220 �+ Phone (303) 320.8333 • &ea/ Roy Romer NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAKING HEARING Governor BEFORE THE Thomas M.Vernon, M.D. COLORADO BOARD OP HEALTH Executive Director NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Revised Statutes 1982, 24--4-.103, that the Colorado Board of Health will conduct n public rulemaking hearing on June 21, 1989, commencing in the morning in Room 412 of the Colorado Department of Health, 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado, to consider the adoption of the proposed changes to the Colorado Department of Health Rules and Regulations Governing Schools. The purpose of the hearing is to allow the public to discuss the proposed changes. The proposed regulation changes have been developed by the Consumer Protection Division with input from local health departments, school administrators .till! interested parties. The regulations will require radon testing of school buildings, written plans for handling, storage and use of hazardous substances, and new safety requirements for playgrounds, laboratories and vocational areas. Some changes were also made to clarify requirements for drinking water quality, sewage disposal, building construction, building occupancy and use, school food service and health care service. The proposed regulations are authorized under 25-1-107 (1 ) (m) , 25--1 . 107 1 (,;) , 25-1-107 (1) (t) , 25-1-108 (1) (c) (I) , and 25--5-508, C.R.S. , 197. ns :nnrrit d, Copies of the proposed redgulations may he obtained by contacting the C•olnrrnlo Department of Health, Consumer Protection Division, 4210 E. 11th .Avenue, • Denver, CO 80220. Any interested person shall have the opportunity to participate in the hearing by submitting written data, views or comments prior to the date of the hearing, or by presenting the same orally. Persons wishing to submit any written data or views should submit them to: Secretary, Colorado Board of Health Colorado Department of Health 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Room 413 Denver, CO 80220 Dated this 24th day of April, 1989 2s224 /61 it-a-anw-S • Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. Executive Director Colorado Department of Health • • • '' Y . it I J .1 cw., TsSTATE OF COLORADO „its/ OLO�IR'ADO'DEPT TMENT OF HEALTH 4210 o 1E5,tit Avenue 1^ 1,,, • 1818 Roy Romer COOP{MO/ Thomas M.Vernon, M.D. NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULEMAKING Executer.Director BEFORE TAB COLORADO BOARD OF HEALTH NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of Section 24-4-103, C.R.S. (Supp. 1988) that the Colorado Board of Health will conduct a public rulemaking hearing on June 21, 1989, commencing in the morning in Room 412 of the Colorado Department of Health, 4210 East 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado to consider the promulgation of proposed amendments to the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations. These amendments include: (1) land ban restrictions; (2) permit modifications; (3) Federal Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) required changes; (4) treatability studies; (5) permit review and issuance; (6) miscellaneous unit requirements. The proposed amendments to the regulations have been developed by the Committee on Hazardous Waste Regulation and the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division pursuant to Section 25-15-302, C.R.S. (Supp. 1988). The changes in the land ban restrictions, permit modifications, HSWA required changes, treatability studies and miscellaneous unit regulations are based upon the Federal regulations. These revisions are necessary for Colorado to maintain primary authority over the regulation of hazardous wastes within its borders. Amendments to the permit review and issuance regulations will streamline the process, but are not federally mandated. Copies may be obtained by contacting the Colorado Department of Health, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division, 4210 East 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80220. Any interested person shall have the opportunity to participate in the hearing by submitting written data, views or comments not later than seven days prior to the date of the hearing, or by presenting the same orally. Persons wishing to submit any written data or views should submit them to: Secretary, Colorado Board of Health Colorado Department of Health 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Color 80220 d................A.2w'+ow Thomas M. Vernon, M.D., Executive Director Dated this 28th day of April, 1989. 3459R/1 BB/jmp 1 . J +M - ` � PHONE: (303) 536.9311 a fl1 \L $��'J� 557 ASH STREET U �J �` ,a; .�.. �i�^ i,:v -� P.O. BOX 351 19 HUDSON. COLORADO 80642 ' x'41,";`.. , CLzpx 30ff TO THE a"On?D COLORADO May 2, 1989 Bluhill American Foods 5891 Nolan Arvada, Colorado 80002 RE: 742 Ash Street Hudson, Colorado Gentlemen: It has long been the understanding that every precaution would be taken to minimize the impact of your processing operation on surrounding, and once removed, properties by your company. Over the past few years the action taken by your company to mitigate the impact of processing has appeared not only to be diminishing, but seems in many instances to be a complete cessation reaction. I have already received complaints of the permeating odors being produced by your operational processes at the present time. Aerators which were installed to accomplish this mitigative process have not been observed in operation this year and very little last year. We also have been informed of discharges from your plant into the slew which ultimately runs behind and to the north of Fox's Trailer Court. we ask you take any and all necessary steps to drastically reduce, if not eliminate any negative impact on properties in the immediate and general vicinity of your processing facilities. We request acknowledgement of our concerns and the steps you plan to take to mitigate the negative impact of your operation in our community. If you would like to meet with representatives of our municipal government to discuss this further, please let me know at your leisure. 5 , J -2- Bluhill American Foods May 2, 1989 If you would like to meet with representatives of our municipal government to discuss this further, please let me know at your leisure. Sincerely, TOWN OF HUDS N, COLORADO Urag \\\*1---. Robert D. Masden, Mayor RDM/ser cc: Board of Trustees Green Bay Food Company, Greenbay, Wisconsin James S. Maloney, Attorney Edward L. Ericson, Administrator . Shirley E. Robertson, Town Clerk Wess Potter, Weld County Department of Health t---C. W. Kirby, Chairman, Weld County Board of Commissioners , Regional Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Cases Approved by Administrative Review 4/28/89 through 5/5/89 CASE NUMBER NAME RE-1169 Hamilton SE-364 Conway, et al c\---A4-12--- Chuck Cun i fe, Director I . DEPARTMENT OF PIANNIN'C. SERVICES SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW Applicant: Michael D. Conway and Emanuel & Evelyn H. Betz SE-364 Legal Description: NEi SW} and NW} SE; of Section 30, T5N, R67W of the Gth P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Criteria Checklist Meets Criteria Yes No NA X 1. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. X 2. The boundary change or temporary use location which would be allowed on the subject property by granting the request will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. X 3. In those instances when used pursuant to Section 9-3 B. (2) of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, the request is the best alternative to dispose of existing improvements in conjunction with the companion Recorded Exemption. APPROVED Subdivision Exemption is approved in accordance with information submitted in the application and the policies of the County. The Department of Planning Services has determined through its review that the standards of Section 9-3 E. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations have been met. by ��7 ,ntCF l.l.i 5n Date >2n, A ,(9 / i j'9 B 1232 REC 02179226 05/10/89 10:55 S . 0 1/002 F 0089 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER• WELD CO, CO —^ 890435 "ti J'!1 2 P,t1RPOraTF✓^,CRY • • MICHAEL D. CONWAY i EMANUEL AND EVELYN H. BETZ SE-364 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAT of SURVEY 989'46'49"E it /65-.C/S 89°46'49"E 00.22"34,Y f 904.47' ((( 41.00' West Line N NE is sW% -Y o Sr ` "s woe 9co/e / 91. 559 oc. total- b o Found Pin ',�`> - . 3322 DC. R.0.W in 0 0 Set Pin Ci ti 4 . 227t oe. net :' Q . `I ° q Southwest Corner NE Southeoat Corner SYY.t , Sec. SO of NE% SW 4 7. 'S'N, R.67W (South Line NE3 Sr 90- 5- 67.E Point of �1 hr J 482.00' — — _...2 Beginning v SB9'2/ ' 42 " W - /8/1.9C ' � ! E WCR No. 5'24. (CO'R.0.4!) I FGAI J)FSCRIPTIQN A TRACT OF LANG LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE $7 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND AND CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER SOUTHWEST QUARTER TO BEAR NORTH 00'22'34' WEST. WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE THERETO* THENCE NORTH 00'22'34' WEST. 406.00 FEET* THENCE SOUTH 89'46'49' EAST , 304.47 FEET) THENCE NORTH 00'22'34' WEST , 41 .00 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 89'46'49" EAST, 165.61 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 0I 'SS'SI" EAST, 440.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER SOUTHWEST QUARTER. THENCE SOUTH 89'21 .42' WEST, 492.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 4.559 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER EASEMENTS AS GRANTED OR RESERVED BY INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD OR AS NOW EXISTING ON SAID TRACT OF LAND. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION WERE PREPARED UNDER MY PERSONAL SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE CORNER MONUMENTS INDICATED HEREON WERE PROPERLY PLACED DURING AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY OF TH LAND COMPLETED ON APRI 14 , 1989. 711 GERALD B. McRAE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR. COLORADO REG. NO. 6616 6616 MC RAE% Sy SHORT, INC. MIKE' CONWAY : Survey of •"" 4./9.99 , 1231 601 AVOW! OREELNY, COLORADO 60631 Pt. NE* SW. ,Sec. 30, T. 5N rnoact Na �- Tdphcn, See-3101 R.C 7 W., ►Ye%d County,Ce/orodo 89044 ,..,.. PWtf,OKTs--U COPY RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MAY 10, 1989 TAPE #89-19 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity with the law and bylaws of said Board at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center, Greeley, Colorado, May 10, 1989, at the hour of 9:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and on roll call the following members were present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem - Excused Commissioner Gene R. Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Assistant County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie Antuna MINUTES: Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of May 8, 1989, as printed. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADDITIONS: Mr. Warden added as Item #6 under New Business — Consider authorization for Chairman to sign Economic Development Grant concerning Ft. Lupton Fish Canning Company. CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the consent agenda as printed. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS: Neither Mike Loustalet, Treasurer, nor Gary McCabe, Ambulance Director, was present to give his scheduled report. WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $290,922.17 Social Services 70,281.64 Handwritten warrants: General fund 3,721.16 Payroll 6,604.13 Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. c 000? I , BIDS: APPROVE MID-SIZE COPIER - PRINT SHOP: Mr. Warden said this item is to be continued to May 31. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER AGREEMENT WITH CLOVERLEAF KENNEL CLUB AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Lt. Kim Fliethman, representing the Sheriff's Office, said this Agreement is to lease part of the parking area at the Cloverleaf Kennel Club for pursuit driving training purposes. He said the Cloverleaf Kennel Club waived the fee for this year. Commissioner Brantner moved to approve said Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, WITH CHANGES, FROM VALLEY HAYLOFT, INC: Lt. Fliethman said there have been no liquor violations at this establishment during the past year. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the renewal of the Tavern Liquor License, with changes to the corporate structure, for Valley Hayloft. Inc. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER PETITION FOR TAX ABATEMENT FROM MIKE SAGE, INC: Cristi Foose, of the Assessor's Office, explained that there was a double assessment on this property for three consecutive years. Dick Keirnes, County Assessor, recommended approval of this Abatement. Commissioner Brantner moved to approve the Petition for Tax Abatement from Mike Sage, Inc. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF VACANT LAND FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS WITH WILLIAM F. WICKERSHAM AND TONI M. WICKERSHAM AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, said this concerns property located near Weld County Road 58 close to the bridge which is to be reconstructed over the South Platte River. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. Let the record reflect that Lee Morrison is now the attorney of record. CONSIDER INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT RE: BEEBE DRAW PUD: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve said Agreement for Beebe Draw PUD. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, said that Mr. Burk is willing to meet the two year provision in the Agreement, but once funding is achieved under the bond issue, he will ask the Board to consider that the two years begin from the date of acquiring the funding. The motion carried unanimously. Minutes — May 10, 1989 Page 2 CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION FOR CHAIRMAN TO SIGN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT CONCERNING FT. LUPTON FISH CANNING COMPANY: Mr. Warden said a grant application for the Ft. Lupton Fish Canning Company was authorized by the Board at an earlier date. He said the State has approved the application for this project which will be coordinated by Delbert Fast. Mr. Warden recommended that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the Grant and the Agreement with Delbert Fast. Commissioner Lacy moved to authorize the Chairman to sign the necessary documents concerning the Economic Development Grant for the Ft. Lupton Fish Canning Company. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING: ZPMH 1/1548 - MARTINEZ: Lanell Curry, representing the Planning Department, said this request from Vicente Martinez is for one mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. She said the Planning staff recommends approval, subject to four conditions. Vicente Martinez, the applicant, came forward to answer questions of the Board. There was no public comment concerning this matter. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve ZPMH #1548 for Vicente Martinez, subject to the recommended conditions. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Brantner, carried unanimously. PROBABLF. CAUSE HEARING - RALPH NIX PRODUCE, INC. (CONT. FROM 2/6/89) : Ms. Curry said an application for an Amended Use by Special Review for this property has been approved by the Planning Commission; therefore, it is requested that this be continued. Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this matter to June 7, after the Amended Use by Special Review is considered by the Board. Commissioner Brantner seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION FOR DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING - GILL LION'S CLUB (CONT. FROM 3/1/89) : This was heard as the last item of today's business. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: BUILDING CODE AND ZONING VIOLATIONS — MONFORT OF COLORADO; REED; TRADER, INCORPORATED; AND BUNTING: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Monfort of Colorado; Bruce D. Reed; Trader, Incorporated; and Londell and Byron Bunting for violations of the Building Code and Zoning Ordinance violations. Commissioner Kennedy seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION FOR DEMOLITION OF DANGEROUS BUILDING - GILL LION'S CLUB (CONT. FROM 3/1/89) : Chuck Cunliffe, Director of Planning Services, said the property is still in violation, but they are continuing to work to come into compliance. Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this matter to August 16. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, carried unanimously. Minutes - May 10, 1989 Page 3 RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:20 A.M. �� //n///�-,�'.�� APPROVED: ATTEST: `71)12 y"'"""' e BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS //JJII WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder et,f,1 and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby; Chair7fin By: A/ G`7/tvc ca ��•-rct</ EXCUSED 1 Deputy County Clerk Jac 1 ne Johnson, Pro-Tem J ,ene R. Brantner s .9„, i d� George Ken d !f Gordo cy ` 1 r Minutes - May 10, 1989 Page 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AGENDA Monday, May 15, 1989 Tape #89-20 ROLL CALL: C.W. Kirby, Chairman Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner George Kennedy Gordon E. Lacy MINUTES: Approval of minutes of May 10, 1989 (Commissioner Johnson excused) CERTIFICATIONS OF HEARINGS: Hearings conducted on May 10, 1989: 1) Show Cause Hearing, Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. ; and 2) Tavern Liquor License, Henry L. Walker, dba Bears Sports Saloon (Commissioner Johnson excused) ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR 1) Communication Services - Brantner REPORTS: 2) Engineering Services - Lacy 3) Health Services - Kennedy 4) Planning Services - Johnson 5) Purchasing & Personnel - Kirby COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER: 1) Warrants (Donald Warden) BUSINESS: OLD: 1) Consider PY '89 Job Service Contract and authorize Chairman to sign (cont. from 5/8/89) NEW: 1) Consider Change of Ownership for 3.2% Beer License to Metro Oil Company, dba Vicker's, from Ronald and Norita Hiatt, dba Road Runner #283 2) Consider renewal request for 3.2Z Beer License from Eugene Russell, dba The Little Store 3) Consider renewal request for 3.2% Beer License from C. Ray and Roberta Hinderliter, dba 1-76 Motel & Cafe 4) Consider renewal request for Tavern Liquor License from C. Ray and Roberta Hinderliter, dba 1-76 Motel & Cafe 5) Consider 1989 Migrant Head Start Supplemental Grant and authorize Chairman to sign 6) Consider Adjustments to Community Maternity Program Contract and Prenatal Program Contract with State Dept. of Health and authorize Chairman to sign 7) Consider Petition for Tax Abatement from Elmer E. Lundvall 8) Consider Amendment to FY 1989-90 Alternative Placement Plan and authorize Chairman to sign 9) Consider Veterans Service Monthly Report for April, 1989, and authorize Chairman to sign 10) Consider Amended Fire Code from Longmont Fire Protection District 11) Consider Resolution re: Temporary Closure of WCR 380 at WCR 67, and 50, and U.S. Highway 34 12) Consider Resolution re: Temporary Closure of WCR 31 between WCR 88.75 and 90 a CONSENT AGENDA APPOINTMENTS: May I5 - Work Session 10:00 AM May 15 - Work Session 1:30 PM May 16 - E-911 Board 12:00 NOON May 16 - Planning Commission 1:30 PM May 16 - Retirement Board 2:15 PM May 16 - Airport Authority 3:00 PM May 18 - Placement Alternatives Commission 12:00 NOON May 22 - NCMC Board of Trustees 12:00 NOON May 22 - Private Industry Council 3:00 PM May 23 - Health Board 9:00 AM May 23 - Housing Authority 11:30 AM May 23 - Communications Board 2:00 PM May 24 - EDAP 7:00 AM May 24 - Meeting with Larimer County Commissioners 12:00 NOON May 25 - Human Resources Council 8:30 AM May 26 - Centennial Developmental Services Board 9:00 AM May 26 - Extension Board 11:00 AM May 29 - HOLIDAY HEARINGS: May 17 - Special Review Permit, Open-pit mine and materials processing facility, C & M Companies (Distel Farm Resources) I0:00 AM May 17 - Show Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. (cont. from 5/10/89) 10:00 AM May 17 - Probable Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. 10:00 AM May 24 - Preliminary Hearing, Casa Grande/Enchanted Hills Local Improvement District 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendment to USR 1726, Vacate Development Standard #4, Ralph Nix Produce, Incorporated 10:00 AM May 31 - Amendments to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 10:00 AM Jun 5 - Show Cause Hearing, Tatum (Cont. from 11/7/88) 9:00 AM REPORTS: 1) Mary Ann Feuerstein, Clerk and Recorder - Collection of Clerk Fees 2) George Goodell. Road and Bridge Director - Road opening COMMUNICATIONS: 1) Planning Commission agenda for May 16, 1989 2) Diversified Operating Corporation re: Sooner Unit 3) State Dept. of Local Affairs re: Notice No. 89-SC-101; Application No. 87-008; and Energy Factors Cogeneration Plan 4) State Dept. of Highways Newsletter No. 89-18 5) Natural Energy Resources Company re: Metro Denver Water Supply Final - Environmental Impact Statement and Rocky Mountain Planning Guide 6) Nuclear Regulatory Commission re: Fort St. Vrain and Federal Register Vol. 54, No. 74 (available in Clerk to Board's Office) 7) State Division of Housing re: Contract for emergency shelter grant 8) Office of State Auditor re: 1987 audit reports RESOLUTIONS: 1) Approve Collateral and Plowing Permit #89-2 for Delwyn Northup * 2) Approve Agreement with Cloverleaf Kennel Club * 3) Approve Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Vacant Land for Rights-of-Way and/or Easements with William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham * 4) Approve Internal Improvements Agreement re: Beebe Draw PUD * 5) Approve ZPMH #1548 - Martinez * 6) Approve Board action concerning Show Cause Hearing, Howard Duckworth. - dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. - * 7) Approve Economic Development Grant concerning Ft. Lupton Fish Canning Company * 8) Approve 3.2% Beer Retail License for The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus No. 250 * 9) Approve temporary closure of WCR 380 at WCR 67, WCR 50, and U.S. Highway 34 * 10) Approve temporary closure of WCR 31 between WCR 88.75 and 90 * 11) Approve setting Probable Cause Hearing - Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Ire. * 12) Approve Petition for Tax Abatement from Elmer E. Lundvall VETERANS REPORT: * 1) Veterans Service Report for April * Signed at this meeting RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF VACANT LAND FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN NECESSARY DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement between Weld County and William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham, for the Purchase and Sale of Vacant Land for Rights-of-Way and/or Easements for construction on Weld County Bridge 58/478 and WHEREAS, said rights-of-way and temporary construction easements being granted by William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham are located in the SE} of the SWa of Section 12, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions are as stated in said Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Vacant Land for Rights-of-Way and/or Easements between Weld County and William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement and other necessary - documents. Z/1 /),") "('; 1 / y .« 890411 Page 2 RE: RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS - WICKERSPAM The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Tel WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. ehfirman EXCUSED BY: I (_.vt { c ! Jac eline Johnson, Pro-Tem ) Deputy County lark APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Bran .nerr George Anne, County Attorney id�GO Oh-cE" 01, • 890411 A AR2179748 AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF VACANT LAND FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this 10th day of May , 19 89 , by and between Weld County, Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "County, " and William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham, 23989 Weld County . Road 58 , Greeley, Colorado 80631, hereinafter referred to as "Owner. " WHEREAS, County wishes to purchase from Owner certain lands described below for the purpose of providing County with a right- of-way, and easements and WHEREAS, Owner wishes to sell to County the land for right- of-way and easements for the consideration below mentioned. WITNESSETH: on co That in consideration of the payment by County to Owner of the sum of Two-thousand, three-hundred, seventy-one and 16/100 a N Dollars ($2 , 371.16 ) , in cash, and other good and valuable aNJ consideration, Owner agrees to sell to County and County agrees to purchase from Owner the right-of-way and/or easements described in 5 r Exhibit (s) A, B, C, and D which is attached hereto and is incorporated herein by reference. Any right-of-way described y„" therein is hereinafter referred to as "right-of-way, " and any z easement described therein is hereinafter described as either "temporary easement" or "permanent easement. " m A C CO The agreement of sale and purchase of right-of-way and e easements is subject to the following conditions: a N 1 . Owner shall furnish to County a Special Warranty Deed x rn conveying only the surface rights of right-of-way andco a deed or other grant of temporary and permanent r easements. a Title for said right-of-way insurance for said 0 .. right-of-way need not be provided by Owner. m N 2 . Title shall be merchantable in Seller, except as stated in this paragraph and in paragraph 5 . Subject to payment or tender as above provided and compliance by z o County with the other terms and provisions hereof, Owner shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient Special r o Warranty Deed to County at a time and place agreed upon by both parties, conveying the parcel free and clear of all taxes, except general taxes for 1989 , payable O January 1, 1990 , free and clear of all liens for O " 599411 Page 1 of 5 Pages special improvements installed as of the date of the County's signature hereon, whether assessed or not; free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and except the recorded and/or apparent easements, and subject to building and zoning regulations and reserving all mineral rights to the Owner. 3. General taxes for the year 1989 shall be apportioned to the date of delivery of the Deed based on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment. 4. The date of closing shall be the date of delivery of said Deed(s) and the receipt of payment by Owner. 5. Except as stated in paragraph 2 and this paragraph, and if title is not merchantable and written notice of defect (s) is given by County or County's agent to Owner or Owner's agent on or before date of closing, Owner shall use reasonable effort to correct said defect(s) prior to date of closing. If Seller is unable to correct said defect (s) on or before date of closing, at Owner' s option and upon written notice to County or "am County's agent on or before date of closing, the date of closing shall be extended thirty (30) days for the a w purpose of correcting said defect (s) . Except as stated co N in paragraph 2, if title is not rendered merchantable as provided in this paragraph 5 , at County's option, this contract shall be void and of no effect and each party K hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder y N and all payments and things of value received hereunder, z if any, shall be returned to County, provided that in lieu of correcting such defect (s) , Owner may within said thirty (30) days, obtain a commitment for Owner' s title coo insurance policy in the amount of the purchase price reflecting title insurance protection in regard to such yLL„ defects, and the County shall have the option of accepting the then existing insured title in lieu of z a = such merchantable title. The Owner shall pay the fulln co premium for such Owner' s title insurance policy. r 1/40 6. The Owner agrees to release County from all x consequential damages, except as otherwise set forth herein in paragraph 8 and except damages caused by the z to negligent or willful misconduct of the County or its o employees, present or perspective, to the remainder of Owner' s property arising out of the construction, m operation, maintenance, or repair of the roadway to be70 constructed thereon. c a, o 7. Time is of the essence hereof. All notes or checks o received as earnest money hereunder, if any, or any r Q N Page 2 of 5 Pages 890411 0 I- II I other payment due hereunder, if any, is not paid, honored or tendered when due, or if any other obligation hereunder is not performed as herein provided, there _ shall be the following remedies: a. IF OWNER IS IN DEFAULT 1 . County may elect to treat this contract as terminated, in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder, if any, shall be returned to County and County may recover such damages as may be proper, or 2. County may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect, and County _ shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damages, or both. b. IF COUNTY IS IN DEFAULT 1 . Owner may elect to treat this contract as terminated, in which all payments and things "' G° of value received hereunder, if any, shall be forfeited and retained on behalf of Owner and au) Owner may recover such damages as may be `° ^' proper, or ms, - ao n 2. Owner may elect to treat this contract as K being in full force and effect and Owner shall z have the right to an action for specific x performance or damages, or both. M ., o-, c co c. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, in the event of any litigation or rising out of this m 0 contract, the Court may award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expenses, including z attorneys fees n rw 8 . Subject to the conditions as set forth in paragraph 13 below, possession of the parcel for right-of-way shall zqi-. be delivered to the County upon closing and shall not be ,,, :° subject to any leases or tenancies. Owner shall assume N all costs of compensating any tenants or lease holders n for any damages as a result of the taking of any 2 _ remainder. (+6 N 9. Owner represents and warrants as of the date hereof and • as of the date of the closing that neither the execution z c of this contract nor the consummation of the transaction 8411 0 Page 3 of 5 Pages or constitute a default under, any indenture, charter, I by-law, mortgage, loan agreement, lien, lease, license, judgment, decree, order, instrument or other verbal or written agreement to which Owner is a party of or is subject to or to which the property is subject, except as provided herein. 10. It is agreed that County has authority pursuant to State statute to condemn right-of-way and easements for the construction of a public road and this proposal is made in lieu of exercise of this power of condemnation. 11 . This agreement embodies all agreements between the parties hereto and there are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations referring to the subject matter whereof other than as contained herein. 12. This agreement shall be deemed a contract extending to and binding upon the parties hereto, and upon their representative heirs, devisees, executors, c administrators, legal representatives, successors and ,., ,., assigns, that only when the same has been approved by i* ^+ the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, on on behalf of Weld County, Colorado. ii: ' ry 13. Other: See the attached Exhibit "E. " to b N z .. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their names this 10th day of May , 1989 M a co, M z WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, by and y N ATTEST: L; ^ e4 through the BOARD OF COUNTY H‘727COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, x a% Weld County , ��`and Recorder COLORADO. nCO and Clerk t© ) .'e, Board m `° �1 � ChairmanCZ, N I:ieputy County' erk R N n O Z a m N z O O [. O r u n o a no 890411 o .. Page 4 of 5 Pages A (The following section to be completed by Owner.) Owner accepts the above proposal this day of , 19 . By: 40700f ,,� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ECh day of CM/1,..c ! , 19 L.V1 . 6 047Z 'hiFSS my hand and official seal. G: j otary Publt �/ r /C1-474 1/4..)f 72:x;.1 .44*fission expires: F/7/19 Greefei_ ea ,'"G(r �/ ro to a N u+ w N N cn Owner accepts the . above proposal this day of � � 19 • q B 1 ' r 2SL c ao do CA CO SUBSCRIBED AND SWOgLN to before me this &'t72 day of +_a: , 19 1 z0 O5 rn r o WITNESS my hand and official seal. / J_ rr Notary Public ,• 9/ a /off .21 . • ;,!1rcom s.iiion expires: g/' /0 q r/ 6iPele .( • CoCr.)la i o • ETC �R..C� cw�`'. D: o v n o cr o a _ 890411 Page 5 of 5 Pages EXHIBIT "A" A tract or parcel of land No. S Rev. of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 2.108 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 54°15'59" E. a distance of 730.81 feet; 1. Thence N. 49°37'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 73.01 feet; 2. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 31.14 feet; 3. Thence N. 8°55'30" W. a distance of 50.77 feet; 4. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 102.17 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 1046.45 feet, the length of arc is 624.43 feet, and the long chord of which bears N. 58°08'40" W. 't W a distance of 615.20 feet; - A U1 6. Thence N. 75°14'20" W. a distance of 192.39 feet to the N N west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. ; 7, 0 7. Thence S. 00°01'44" W. along the west line of the SE 1/4 x of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. , a x distance of 82.72 feet; .b -4 (q CO 8. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. along the south right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 66.79 feet; H V+ 9. Thence continuing along the south right-of-way line of the H county road (1988), S. 54°40'41" E., a distance of z 56.95 feet; n co 10. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. a distance of 51.25 feet; • ►• a 2, .. 11. Thence along the arc of a curve to the right, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 564.75 feet, and � �' the long chord of which bears S. 58°08'40" E. a distance of p 556.41 feet; • o • o ea o r 0 n o 0\ 890421 00 Exhibit "A" Page 2 12. Thence S. 41°03'00" E. a distance of 175.44 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above described parcel contains 2.108 acres, more or less, of which 0.423 acres are in the right-of-way of the present road. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W., of the 6th P.M. MW a iv v1 CO W N C n K O z Z r x � Ma C+S CO m mo H W C4 N z a' f CO %o Co 7Ca a N N O O C9•CA X 0 Di O C.. O r n o -4 O ' O - p 890411 EXHIBIT "B" A tract or parcel of land No. 5A of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/478 containing 0.104 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M., in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 51°19'47" E. a distance of 940.72 feet; 1. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 372.78 feet, and the chord of which arc bears N. 54°40'41" W. a distance of 370.37 feet to the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988); 2. Thence S. 54°40'41" E. along the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 370.37 feet, more "o or less, to the point of beginning. "' � 11 N (T CO A o Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. 9 rb s x0 The above-described parcel contains 0.104 acres, more or less. o z 2 •-+ Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. z -4 ko 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. C CO to CA H CPI H Z ON O CW xr N SAN O b 0to .bO z O 0 O C? :legals O c a O � 890411 J • FXR NT "C" A permanent easement No. PES of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/478 containing 0.033 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. of the 6th Y.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said easement being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 46026'42" E. a distance of 713.39 feet; 1. Thence N. 41003' W. a distance of 74.47 feet; 2. Thence S. 8055'30" E. a distance of 50.77 feet; 3. Thence S. 41003' E. a distance of 31.14 feet to the east line of the property. 4. Thence N. 49037'55" E. along the east line • of the property a distance of 27.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. ^7 to For the purpose of maintaining the county road. v ()� N The above described easement contains 0.033 acres, more or less. K Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing b ^' N. 89044.34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th x %o P.M. cao m Vi o Htn 2 O, 0 CO • b • a q .. N 70 N :ldpar5 �± O 0 +11 PV • o tto C. C, O � O• ~ 890411 I EXHIBT'[ "0' TEMPORARY EASEMENTS Temporary Easement No. TES A strip of land 40' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project's northerly right-of-way line from the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 12, and extending easterly to left of station 13+02.3, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/47B. Temporary Easement No. TE5A A strip of land 50' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 20+00.9, and extending easterly to A N the east line of the property, as part of Weld rn N County Project No. 58/47B. en pc: • k Temporary Easement No. TESB > N z zv t A strip of land 15' wide lying parallel to and t*. a adjacent the project right-of-way line from left °0 of station 13+02.3, and extending easterly to o left of station 20+00.9. as part of Weld County D-3\ Project No. 58/47B. z n co rn Temporary Easements No. TES, TE5A and TESS shall expire within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. a. X1N • O tt M N PC a • a tia r, O O :fma.1 890411 O o r EXHIBIT "E" 1 . County shall pay Owner the sum of One-thousand, three-hundred, fifty dollars ($1 ,350 .00) as liquidated damages for any damage Owner may have suffered as a result of the removal of Owners' irrigation ditch immediately north of the present right-of-way of Weld County Read 58, and subsequent replacement of said ditch immediately north of the right-of-way purchased by and through this Agreement. In consideration of this sum, Owner shall release County from any and all claims which Owner may have suffered or will suffer as a result of said removal and replacement of said ditch. 2. In the course of its work in reconstructing Weld County Road 58 , County shall construct a five wire, barbed wire fence with steel posts, two fourteen foot (14 ' ) gates and one sixteen foot (16 ' ) gate at the driveways, and replace Owners' irrigation structure, all in accordance with the plans and to specifications which are attached hereto. r •-• A N 3 . County shall install a permanent culvert/ditch which shall J N carry water from Owners ' pump house ditch to the new cement ditch which lies immediately north of and adjacent to et right-of-way. K O 4 . County agrees to refrain from constructing upon right-of-way z until after the 1989 irrigating crop year is completed. In z o any event, this date shall be no later than October 15 , 1989 . M -4 Owner shall have access to right-of-way during the 1989 c co irrigating crop year for the purpose of cultivating said right-of-way as part of Owners ' set-aside crop. y 5 . In the course of working on or maintaining its permanent and/or temporary easements, County shall not interfere with n co the operation of Owners irrigation well. r o ct xa a PJ t'i N [9 n 0 0 ca+4 700 o [to r 0 n .- 00- 0 890411 0F+ a AR2179751 GRANT OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that WILLIAM F. WICKERSHAM and TONI M. WICKERSHAM, 23989 Weld County Road 58, Greeley, Colorado 80631 , of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, - GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE-HUNDRED, EIGHTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($185. 00) and other valuable consideration, in hand paid by WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, GRANTEE, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have given and granted and by these presents do hereby give and grant unto the said Grantee, its heirs, successors, and assigns, a permanent easement, on, along, over and across the premises described in the attached Exhibit "A, " and temporary easements on, along, over and across the premises described in Exhibit "B, " for the purpose of improving - and reconstructing Weld County Road 58 in Weld County, Colorado. The permanent easement described in Exhibit "A" shall be subject to and shall not interfere with Grantors ' ability to operate their irrigation well located thereon. The Grantors hereby covenant with the Grantee that they have ropo good title to the afore-described premises; and that they have ... ,- good and lawful right to grant these easements. a N O1 lo.) a.iv Signed this day of /1/4k , 1989. ?% g - GRANTOR Kn o /C-lG a z zlliam F. Wickersham z ,a - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this etA day of Pys c - - /\\ � , 1989. m o -, Wt3-NES my hand and official seal. ( m cr � . . (• V•. .. / M a - I / I zN /t R�l' r .l �' . 4Q /J)1-1 n� \C C No' any Pub li V /5 /OO' �1 . rkn A *'fycbuimission expires: th/8r / V `�`�� / CE,1) 2OLZ1 3c:' ..,�•c Toni M. Wickersham 6 - o SUBSCRIPFD AND SWORN to before me this P Lk day of z - c - CM', i 6' , 1989. x O en a �,,) .A'I'D S my hand and official seal. (Tip' f r • ••. 4,L_i.a• U C �� '�^ p ••••. Notary Publi� o : `, my ,Cotimission expires: a/7/pr ^o a 9;E •,.. ....• ; 890411 EXHIBIT e 1 A A permanent easement No. PE5 of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.033 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said easement being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12. T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 46026'42" E. a distance of 713.39 feet; 1. Thence N. 41003' W. a distance of 74.47 feet; 2. Thence S. 8055'30" E. a distance of 50.77 feet; 3. Thence S. 41003' E. a distance of 31.14 feet to the east line of the property. 4. Thence N. 49037'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 27.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. For the purpose of maintaining the county road. Mto A N ON CAI The above described easement contains 0.033 acres, more or less. N N gi M Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing K n N. 89044'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.45W. , 6th o na P.M. z z 'O w PI -4 N C w co lA o t,3 N \ -I N • N .Z' c n o, ✓ .o m x a :Idpar5 ° N, d. n O z 0 to vi Poo xo c*, o r 0 n O N o 890411 0 0 EXHIBIT TEMPORARY EASEMENTS Temporary Easement No. TES . A strip of land 40' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project's northerly right-of-way line from the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 12, and extending easterly to left of station 13+02.3, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/473. Temporary Easement No. TE5A `*JW A strip of land 50' wide lying parallel to and a h+ adjacent the project right-of-way line from left cum of of station 20+00.9, and extending easterly to the east line of the property, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/473. .e O b tv z � Temporary Easement No. TESB - tr• u) c A strip of land 15' wide lying parallel to and o adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 13+02.3, and extending easterly to N' left of station 20+00.9, as part of Weld County Z cn Project No. 58/473. n °° r to tt z ye .. Temporary Easements No. TES, TESA and TESB shall expire within el .. thirty (30) days after completion of construction. • a m • a ta+n • a t9 o ow O w w:fma.3. 890411 .. w `ortled at o'clocic�__M AR ?179750 option No._ recorder. l RECORDER'S STAMP 1 THIS DEED,Made this 8th day of May 1 19 89 ,between William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham - of the County of Weld and State of Colo- rado,of the first part, and Weld County, Colorado, by and _ through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld xldro3od *nxhkg aisc County, whose legal address is - 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 , of the County of weld and State of Colorado,of the second part: - ' WITNESSETH,That the said part of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX AND SIXTEEN HUNDREDTHS Dollars, to the said parties of the first part,in hand paid by the said party of the second part,the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and con- veyed, '! and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said party of the second part, its heirs and assigns forever, all the following described lot or parcel of land,situate,lying and being in the County of Weld and State of Colorado,to wit: That property described in the attached Exhibits "A" and "B-" I abucknattazswt ,eeraant civn.w&me _ Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging,or in - anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof;and all the estate,right,title,interest,claim and demand whatsoever,of the said parties of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto �1 v the said party of the second part, its ,� 1., heirs and assigns forever. a N And the said °t°J O N parties of the first part,for xak the irselves, their heirs,executors and administrators,do covenant,grant,bargain and agree to and with the said party of the 5 Es second part, its heirs and assigns, the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable ,. n - possession of said part y of the second part, its heirs and assigns, against all and every , o person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, by, through or z l - under the said party of the first part to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. z - - IN WITNESS WHEREOF,The said parties of the first part have hereunto set their zg - ' hand s and seal s the day and year first above written. c o en co o Signed,Sealed and Delivered in the presence of [SEAL) es)-.. a WILLIAM F. WICKERSHAM 1-I I--• zoS - • rT [SEAL) n co u ,�' i,P)c, 1_A �. e ri ke.'s 0 ,—“SEALI — STATE OF COLORADO, TONI M. WICKERSHAM x ,w / 58. II, .. a County of N xw The C/ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8 Ch day of 'I 1 ?U," t* 19 l,c/ ,by YJiiiiaura r to,Ckcr-;/inrY) ei,,,-CTUn,Ad . (.L%,cC.crd-tCcr\,(, 0 v ,,`'Vtor/icblile expires a,.t (A:31 tf ,19 c-'j .Witnee� y hand/ and offi al ice �Q , / V Notary Publle. 0 0 c/CS /cC7-' &' 0 • 1 C ' Che'c'k et Stxoa./ O ^r..` l? o - O a - - No.16 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED.—Bradford Publishing Coo 1824-4e Stout Street,Denver.Colorado(673-15011)117759O �(/ a No. SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED TO STATE OF COLORADO, I ss. County of I hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record in my office at _ o'clock _M., ,19_ and is duly recorded in Book Page_ Film No. Reception No. Recorder, By __ Deputy. Fees,$ _ -- Mail to: (or return to) Send future tax statements to: tra ERA IFORU PUNEi911NG CO,OENVER EXHIBIT "A" A tract or parcel of land No. 5 Rev. of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 2.108 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 54°15'59" E. a distance of 730.81 feet; 1. Thence N. 49°37'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 73.01 feet; 2. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 31.14 feet; 3. Thence N. 8°55'30" W. a distance of 50.77 feet; 4. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 102.17 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius nncv of which is 1046.45 feet, the length of arc is 624.43 feet, and the long chord of which bears N. 58°08'40" W. a N ON w a distance of 615.20 feet; m 6. Thence N. 75°14'20" W. a distance of 192.39 feet to the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, he T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. ; y a z .- 7. Thence S. 00°01'44" W. along the west line of the SE 1/4 z of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. , a distance of 82.72 feet; a o rn 8. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. along the south right-of-way line r of the county road (1988) a distance of 66.79 feet; N1-• xrn 9. Thence continuing along the south right-of-way line of the n m county road (1988), S. 54°40'41" E. , a distance of '° 56.95 feet; .• 10. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. a distance of 51.25 feet; °' bw 11. Thence along the arc of a curve to the right, the radius of raj which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 564.75 feet, and O the long chord of which bears S. 58°08'40" E. a distance of M ti 556.41 feet; p o • eao r 0 O N • n o O a 890411 Exhibit "A" Page 2 12. Thence S. 41°03'00" E. a distance of 175.44 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above described parcel contains 2.108 acres, more or less, of which 0.423 acres are in the right-of-way of the present road. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.N. M � A C\ MW N > 'A CJ 1n .e 0 b N Z 4.4 VI tee, Co M co H o HU+ [O fr r Zrn no r � ca x A Z1 W C) n 0 x v PS-V> pi Eo tt r C7 n OW O Oa 8%411 EXHIBIT "B" A tract or parcel of land No. SA of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.104 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.SN. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 51°19'47" E. a distance of 940.72 feet; 1. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 372.78 feet, and the chord of which arc bears N. 54°40'41" W. a distance of 370.37 feet to the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988); 2. Thence S. 54°40'41" E. along the north right-of-way line Pt ea of the county road (1988) a distance of 370.37 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. as N rn � W Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. Z .e The above-described parcel contains 0.104 acres, more or less. y, Z �- Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. Z 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the M N 6th P.M. m o cn cno H N I- M -• xa n co r co 7C• I— a+ N Lo C4 xi• 0 Eo too n :legals O a 0 no O A 890411 the printed Mutton of this form .printed W tp. Colorado Weal 0. Commission ,55.604.711 STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT SELLER'S M PURCHASER'S O PROPERTY ADDRFSS William F. Wickersham SELLEP Toni N. Wickersham , PURCI1ASFT' Weld County, Colorado SETTLEMENT DATE . DATE OF PRORATION , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D." Debit Credit I! 2371 116 1, Sailing Price ! 2. Deposit,paid to None - 3. Trust Deed,payable to None 1 4, Trust Deed, payable to None 5, Trust Deed,payoff to None ti 6. Interest on Loan Assumed None II 7. Title ins.Premium None I it 8. Abstracting: Before Sale None 9. After Sale None 1 II 10. Title Exam.by 11. Recording: Warranty Deed Purchaser exempt 530-1-103, C.R.S. I 12. Trust Deed None 13. Release None 14. Other � I I 15. Documentary Fee Purchaser exempt §39-13-102, C.R.S. I i I , 16. Certificate of Taxes Due Received by Purchaser 17, Taxes for Preceding Year(s) Payable by Seller on July 31, 1989 ` I 18. Taxes for Current Year None 19. Tax Reserve None 20. Special Taxes None II 21. Personal Property Taxes None i II ii II 22. Hazard Ins.Prem.Assumed—Policy No. Co. $ Yr.Term Expires 1 Premium$ Days Unused at 0 per day i I 23. Premium for New Insurance None 24. Hazard Ins.Reserve None 25. FHA Mortgage Ins,Assumed None II 26. FHA Mortgage Ins.Reserve None 11 27. Loan Service Fee (Buyer) None �I 28. Loan Discount Fee (Seller) one 29. Interest on New Loan None 30. Survey and/or Credit Report None 31. Appraisal Fee None II 32. Water and/or Sewer None 33, Rents None 34. Security Deposits None 35. Loan Transfer Fee None I II 36. Loan Payment Due None • II 37. Broker's Fee None II I I II . II I 1 I ! I I II 2371 I16 Sub-Totals lI I utx Balance due ta/from Buyer 2371 p6 II TOTALS 2371 116 II 2371 116 Thu above figures do not include sales or use taxes on personal property APPROVED and ACCEPTED f F+ /Seller /A6l/% u4� a< — Brok^• iam F. W{�cker$ham gland It/Sclle'" t k ( x-:---4 .., Pc-ti^v._0 ,, , By Toni M. Wickersham From No.LASS 890411 I EXHIBIT "A" A tract or parcel of land No. 5 Rev. of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 2.108 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 54°15'59" E. a distance of 730.81 feet; 1. Thence N. 49°37'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 73.01 feet; 2. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 31.14 feet; 3. Thence N. 8°55'30" W. a distance of 50.77 feet; 4. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 102.17 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 1046.45 feet, the length of arc is 624.43 feet, and the long chord of which bears N. 58°08'40" W. a distance of 615.20 feet; 6. Thence N. 75°14'20" W. a distance of 192.39 feet to the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. ; 7. Thence S. 00°01'44" W. along the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. , a distance of 82.72 feet; 8. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. along the south right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 66.79 feet; 9. Thence continuing along the south right-of-way line of the county road (1988), S. 54°40'41" E. , a distance of 56.95 feet; 10. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. a distance of 51.25 feet; 11. Thence along the arc of a curve to the right, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 564.75 feet, and the long chord of which bears S. 58°08'40" E. a distance of 556.41 feet; 89041 Exhibit "A" Page 2 12. Thence S. 41°03'00" E. a distance of 175.44 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above described parcel contains 2.108 acres, more or less, of which 0.423 acres are in the right-of-way of the present road. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.6SW. , of the 6th P.M. 890411 EXHIBIT "B" A tract or parcel of land No. SA of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.104 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 51°19'47" E. a distance of 940.72 feet; 1. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 372.78 feet, and the chord of which arc bears N. 54°40'41" W. a distance of 370.37 feet to the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988); 2. Thence S. 54°40'41" E. along the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 370.37 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above-described parcel contains 0.104 acres, more or less. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. :legals 890411 • EXHIBIT "C" A permanent easement No. PES of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.033 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said easement being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 46026'42" E. a distance of 713.39 feet; 1. Thence N. 41003' W. a distance of 74.47 feet; 2. Thence S. 8055'30" E. a distance of 50.77 feet; 3. Thence S. 41003' E. a distance of 31.14 feet to the east line of the property. • 4. Thence N. 49037'55" E. along the east line • of the property a distance of 27.00 feet, more or less, to the point of:beginning. For the purpose of maintaining the county road. The above described easement contains 0.033 acres, more or less. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89044'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.6,SW. , 6th P.M. :ldpar5 890411 EXHIBIT "P" TEMPORARY EASEINTS Temporary Easement No. TES . A strip of land 40' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project's northerly right-of-way line from the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 12, and extending easterly to left of station 13+02.3, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/47B. Temporary Easement No. TE5A A strip of land 50' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 20+00.9, and extending easterly to the east line of the property, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/47B. • Temporary Easement No. TESB A strip of land 15' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 13+02.3, and extending easterly to left of station 20+00.9, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/47B. Temporary Easements No. TES, TE5A and TESS shall expire within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. • • :fma.1 890411 /a. 'rolled Mwnn a this Mn,. noo.e.cd In re. Colorado Kral a Con..nnuoe ,5S.6d.1.71t STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT SELLER'S O PURCHIASER'Sg PROPERTY William F. Wickersham 5EL1 Nip Toni M. Wickersham P WW1 L>,SFP Weld County, Colorado SETTLEMENT DA7P. , DATE OF PRORATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D." Debit Credit 1. Selling Price 2371 16 2. Deposit,paid to None 3. Trust Deed,payable to None ! 4. Trust Deed, payable to None I I 5. Trust Deed,payoff to None 6. Interest on Loan Assumed None 7. Title Ins.Premium None 8. Abstracting: Before Sale None 9. After Sale None 10. Title Exam.by 11. Recording: Warranty Deed Purchaser exempt §30-1-103, C.R.S. 12. Trust Deed None '' 13. Release None 14. Other 15. Documentary Fee Purchaser exempt §39-13-102, C.R.S. 16. Certificate of Taxes Due Received by Purchaser 17. Taxes for Preceding Year(s) Payable by. Seller on July 31, 1989 18. Taxes for Current Year None 19. Tax Reserve None 20. Special Taxes None 21. Personal Property Taxes None 22. Hazard Ins.Prem. Assumed—Policy No. Co. $ Yr.Term Expires Premium$ Days Unused at >' per day 23. Premium for New Insurance None 24. Hazard Ins.Reserve None 25. FHA Mortgage Ins.Assumed None 26. FHA Mortgage Ins.Reserve None 27. Loan Service Fee (Buyer) None I 23. Loan Discount Fee (Seller) None II 29. Interest on New Loan None 30. Survey and/or Credit Report None 31. Appraisal Fee None 32. Water and/or Sewer None 33. Rents None 34. Security Deposita None 35. Loan Transfer Fee None 36. Loan Payment Due None - 37. Broker's Fee None , 1 . Sub-Totals 2371 16 1 i 2371 16 Balance due to/ftsota Seller TOTALS . 2371 16 I 2371 16 Thu above figures do not include sales or use taxes on personal property I APPROVED and ACCEPTED Cl' ttt/ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, by an through ,,, the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF �" Purchaser/&bar WELD C0UNTY • jdvrAT'rFa'r• wFl4IiHYdr73 1M7f" By F " 'fr poly County rk �. w. a riy, TT airman Fran NO.COS 800wjj I EXHIBIT "A" A tract or parcel of land No. 5 Rev. of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 2.108 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W., of the 6th P.M., in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N., R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 54°15'59" E. a distance of 730.81 feet; 1. Thence N. 49°37'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 73.01 feet; . 2. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 31.14 feet; 3. Thence N. 8°55'30" W. a distance of 50.77 feet; 4. Thence N. 41°03'00" W. a distance of 102.17 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 1046.45 feet, the length of arc is 624.43 feet, and the long chord of which bears N. 58°08'40" W. a distance of 615.20 feet; 6. Thence N. 75°14'20" W. a distance of 192.39 feet to the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.SN. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. ; 7. Thence S. 00°01'44" W. along the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W., 6th P.M. , a distance of 82.72 feet; 8. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. along the south right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 66.79 feet; 9. Thence continuing along the south right-of-way line of the county road (1988), S. 54°40'41" E. , a distance of 56.95 feet; 10. Thence S. 75°14'20" E. a distance of 51.25 feet; 11. Thence along the arc of a curve to the right, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 564.75 feet, and the long chord of which bears S. 58°08'40" E. a distance of 556.41 feet; 89042.1 Exhibit "A" Page 2 12. Thence S. 41°03'00" E. a distance of 175.44 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above described parcel contains 2.108 acres, more or less, of which 0.423 acres are in the right-of-way of the present road. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W., of the 6th P.M. 890411 EXHIBIT "B" A tract or parcel of land No. 5A of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.104 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 51°19'47" E. a distance of 940.72 feet; 1. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, the radius of which is 946.45 feet, the length of arc is 372.78 feet, and the chord of which arc bears N. 54°40'41" W. a distance of 370.37 feet to the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988); 2. Thence S. 54°40'41" E. along the north right-of-way line of the county road (1988) a distance of 370.37 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting all mineral interests thereunder. The above-described parcel contains 0.104 acres, more or less. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89°44'34" W. from the S 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , of the 6th P.M. :legals 890411 • EXHIBIT "C" A permanent easement No. FES of Weld County, Colorado, Project No. 58/47B containing 0.033 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, T.SN. , R.65W. of the 6th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said easement being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at a point on the east line of the property from which the S 1/4 corner of Section 12. T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. bears S. 46026'42" E. a distance of 713.39 feet; 1. Thence N. 41003' W. a distance of 74.47 feet; 2. Thence S. 8055'30" E. a distance of 50.77 feet; 3. Thence S. 41003' E. a distance of 31.14 feet to the east line of the property. 4. Thence N. 49037'55" E. along the east line of the property a distance of 27.00 feet, more or less, to the point of:beginning. For the purpose of maintaining the county road. The above described easement contains 0.033 acres, more or less. Basis of Bearings: Assuming the south line of said SW 1/4 as bearing N. 89044'34" W. from the 5 1/4 corner of Section 12, T.5N. , R.65W. , 6th P.M. :ldpar5 890411 l I 11 I I TB T •D" TE TORARY EASEMENTS Temporary Easement No. TE5 . A strip of land 40' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project's northerly right-of-way line from the west line of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 12, and extending easterly to left of station 13+02.3, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/47$. Temporary Easement No. TESA A strip of land 50' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 20+00,9, and extending easterly to the east line of the property, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/478. Temporary Easement No. TE5B A strip of land 15' wide lying parallel to and adjacent the project right-of-way line from left of station 13+02.3, and extending easterly to left of station 20+00.9, as part of Weld County Project No. 58/478. Temporary Easements No. TES, TESA and TE5B shall expire within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. • :fma.1 fma.l 1 AR2179749 RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS THIS RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS, which is signed and entered into this `i lL. day of /MA., , 19ikek , by William F. Wickersham and Toni M. Wickersham, hereinaTrei referred to as "Releasor (s) . " WITNESSETH: That the Releasor (s) , being of lawful age, for the sole consideration of $1, 350 .00 to the Releasor (s) in hand paid, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do/does hereby and for my/our/its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, release, quit, and forever discharge Weld County, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, its CO employees, agents, and assigns from any and all claims, actions, - - causes of action, demands, rights , damages, costs, loss of a NJ service, expenses, and compensation whatsoever which the W N Releasor (s) now has/have or which may hereafter accrue on account ro of or in any way growing out of any and all known and unknown, x r, foreseen and unforeseen and property damage and the consequences K o thereof resulting or to result from the removal of Releasors ' D%. NJ irrigation ditch which was located immediately north of the z current location of Weld County Road 58 and on Lot "B" of Recorded Exemption No. 0961-12-4-RE1053, and subsequent replacement of said M ditch immediately to the north of the new proposed right-of-way of C `° WCR 58 which Releasee is purchasing from Releasors by way ofVI o Agreement dated M. !qt Cr`t , a copy of which is y` attached hereto. 1-4• CO • c' CO It is understood and agreed that this Release is a compromise of a doubtful and disputed claim, and that the payment made is not to be construed as an admission of liability on the part of the a parties hereby released, and that said Releasees deny liability o - therefor and intend merely to avoid litigation and buy their Mc.) peace. o z a The Releasor (s) further declare (s) and represent (s) that no M o promise, inducement, or agreements not herein expressed has been 0 made to the Releasor (s) and that this Release contains the entire r agreement between the parties hereto, and that the terms of this Release are contractual and not a mere recital. o - 0 Co o N Page 1 of 2 Pages 890411 The undersigned Releasor (s) has/have read the foregoing Release and fully understand (s) it. SIGNED THIS P day of /fi�t , 19 1` . WIL IAM F. WICKERSHAM SUBSCRIBED AND S 09.N , to before me this 5 ' day of \U\ 4,CII7E" S my hand and official seal. ! / ''� .' ,lam-�07c•� mazy Pub11 C/� /C tic ,f • My cbmmfssion expires: F/'f7�; �7rc-olc/ . ec ?Tjla3/ � N •'Y u, w �TFOF c in \ WAY To z M. WICKERSHAM p N z z .� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,, C-2' day of ^7 YY�/v . I , 19 /(9 . K K - WITNESS my hand and official seal. C y c ,U1 Ate i H to M V • t y•, Notary Publi� Z U 1//5 /vcx. S/ n VD Mt k commission expires: G,/7/g 7 6ree/c7 Co 8663/ z % 'o Q • "q CO'', „ Qe '" C4 0 O 6 O M 4,1 x • z O C4 o O (, oN O (` o p N Page 2 of 2 Pages S9041 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WELD COUNTY SHERIFF AND CLOVERLEAF k KENNEL CLUB AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld. County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Nome Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement between the Weld County Sheriff and Cloverleaf Kennel Club for the use of the paved parking lot area at the Club's greyhound racing facility for driver training, and WHEREAS, the term of said Agreement is from May 15 , 1989 , to December 31 , 1989, with the further terms and conditions being as stated in the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement between the Weld County Sheriff and Cloverleaf Kennel Club be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County lerk and Recorder det ,91 - and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Ch rman / s EXCUSED BY:CVO)?C.6C. r 2 ( -% , a2 Jac line Johnson, Pro-Tem /eputy Countyllerk APPyat ED AS TO FORM: Sene R. Bra ner CjL �r� George Ke ne County Attorney f, ✓ GordollO ."i.at$�'r/ ` CCOO � ge. CZ --(7,�n'-..•:_4/.;.--6,z - Yl/ 890408 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of May , 1989, by and between the County of Weld and the Weld County Sheriff, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the Cloverleaf Kennel Club, hereinafter referred to as the "Club": WHEREAS, the County is desirous of entering into a contract with the Club for the use of the paved parking lot area at the Club's greyhound racing facility at 2527 West Frontage Road, Loveland. Colorado for driver training, and, WHEREAS, the Club is agreeable to allowing the use of the paved parking lot area on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and, WHEREAS, such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of 30-11-406, Colorado Revised Statutes as amended, 1973. and so provided for by the Weld County Home Rule Charter, Section 3-8, NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statute and Weld County Home Rule Charter. it is agreed as follows: 1. That the County, by way of the Sheriff, may have access to the _ paved parking lot area of the Club upon prior arrangements of the Club hereinafter set forth: a. Access will be restricted to days that will not conflict with Club operations b. Prior permission will be obtained a minimum of two weeks in advance of each use for a specific period of time. 2. The County shall furnish and supply all supervision, equipment. agents and employees to conduct driver training. 3. The County agrees, at its own expense, to procure adequate insurance against and to indemnify, defend and hold the Club harmless against any and all of the following types of claims: a. Claims by any County employee for compensation. fringe benefits of any kind whatever (including, but without limitation, insurance of any kind or reimbursement of medical expenses) or indemnification for tort claim damages or similar claims for damages. b. Claims by any other party for damages for an alleged unlawful act or omission, negligent or willful, on the part of any County employee acting pursuant to this agreement. 4. In the event equipment or property belonging to the Club is damaged from the extraordinary driver training use, the Club may make a claim for the damage to the County. The County may reimburse for actual damages as determined by the County's insurance adjuster for damage incurred in connection with the extraordinary driver training use. The County, however, will not 890408 be responsible for normal wear and tear associated with maintenance required of the Club equipment or facilities. 5. This Agreement shall be effective from May 15, 1989 to December 31, 1989. 6. The County, by way of the Sheriff, agrees to pay $50 for the use c of the Club parking lot area for the term of this Agreement. The fee is due and payable in the first month of the contract term and is not refundable if the contract is sooner terminated. 7. This Agreement may be renewed for a 12 month period each calendar year beginning January 1 upon written concurrence by both parties of the terms and conditions of the renewed Agreement, including any revision of rates and charges agreed upon prior to December 31 of each calendar year. Otherwise, this Agreement will automatically terminate by its own terms. 8. This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time providing that the party seeking to terminate the agreement provide the other party 30 days written notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Club has caused this Agreement to be signed by a duly authorized representative of the Club and the County of Weld. by the County Board of Commissioners, has caused these present to be subscribed by the Weld County Sheriff and the Chairman of said Board and the seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the Clerk of said Board, all on the day and year first above written. CLOVERLEAF KENNEL CLUB BOARD 0 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ) erk, E and of Chairman ot!aty ommissioners WELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE She 890408 4 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT ACCORDING TO POLICY REGARDING COLLATERAL FOR INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN WELD COUNTY AND BEEBE DRAW FARMS, LTD. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, the Board has been presented with an Improvements Agreement according to the policy regarding collateral for internal improvements, said Improvements Agreement being between Weld County and Beebe Draw Farms, Ltd. , and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Improvements Agreement, with the terms and conditions being as stated in the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Improvements Agreement according to the policy regarding collateral for internal improvements between Weld County and Beebe Draw Farms, Ltd. , be , and hereby is, approved. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: l'^-11772"4447:411 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.h.Kirby, Ch irman r• i EXCUSED 0--1,* t,� 1 q caJ Jac eline Johnson, Pro-Tem De uty County Cl rk APPROVED 4S TO FORM: Gene R. Brrantner6�{ Geozge iCn-e CV 721 County Attorney _ / Gord a y jJ JJ25rig `/) (I We'd& 890410 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT ACCORDING POLICY REGARDING COLLATERAL FOR IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of May 1989, by and between the County of Weld, State of—Colorado, acting througn its Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter called "County" , BEEBE DRAW FARMS, LTD. , a Colorado limited partnership, hereinafter called "Applicant", and BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, hereinafter called "District". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Applicant is the owner of or has a controlling interest in the following described property in the County of Weld, Colorado: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL WHEREAS, there has been created by law the District for the purpose of providing certain services and facilities to the property owners within the District, including the installation of certain improvements; and WHEREAS, a final subdivision plat of said property, to be known as REPLAT OF FIRST FILING OF BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER has been submitted to the County for approval; and WHEREAS, Section 11-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations provides that no final plat shall be approved by the County until the Applicant has submitted a Subdivision Improvement Agreement guaranteeing the construction of the public improvements shown on plans, plats and supporting documents of the subdivision, which improvements, along with a time schedule for completion, are listed in Exhibit "A" and "B" of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the foregoing and of the acceptance and approval of said final plat, the parties hereto promise, covenant and agree as follows: A. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1.0 Engineering Services: District shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering services in connection with the design and construction of the subdivision improvements listed on Exhibit "A" , except telephone and electric, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 1.1 The required engineering services shall be performed by a Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor registered in the State of Colorado, and shall conform to the standards and criteria established by the County for public improvements. 1.2 The required engineering services shall consist of, but not be limited to, surveying, designs, plans and profiles, estimates, construction supervision, and the submission of necessary documents to the Cuun�y. 890314 2.0 Construction: District shall furnish and install , at its own expense, the subdivision improvements listed on Exhibit "A" , except telephone and electric, according to the construction schedule set out in Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 2.1 Said construction shall be in strict conformance to the plans and drawings approved by the County and the specifications adopted by the County for such improvements. 2.2 District shall employ, at its own expense, a qualified testing company previously approved by the County to perform all testing of materials or construction that is required by the County; and shall furnish copies of test results to the County. 2.3 At all times during said contruction, the County shall have the right to test and inspect or to require testing and inspection of material and work at District' s expense. Any material or work not conforming to the approved plans and specifications shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the County at the District' s expense. 2.4 The District shall furnish proof that proper arrangements have been made for the installation of interior roads, water, certain landscaping and and the amenity buildings. B. APPLICANT AND DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES: The Applicant shall furnish proof that proper arrangements have been made for the installation of underground electric and telephone service to each lot. 2.5 Said subdivision improvements listed on Exhibit "A" shall be completed, according to the terms of this Agreement, within the construction schedule appearing in Exhibit "B". The Board of County Commissioners, at its option, may grant an extension of the time of completion shown on Exhibit "B" upon application by the Applicant or District subject to the terms of Section 6 herein. The District responsibility to install the subdivision improvements shall however be subject to the availability of bond funds in amounts sufficient to pay the costs of installation of such improvements. In the event bond funds are insufficient to pay the cost of installation, applicant shall be liable for the completion of the improvements and shall provide collateral of the type and amount specified by this agreement. County, at its discretion, may withhold issuance of any residential building permits until District gives notice that funds are sufficient to pay the cost of installation of the improvements listed in Exhibit "A" or until collateral , in an amount and type consistent with the terms of this Agreement, is provided by the Applicant and accepted by the County. District agrees that the portion of the funds raised by the bond issue for the purpose of meeting its obligations hereunder shall be segregated and restricted and shall not be used for any other purpose until the construction of the improvements defined in Exhibit "A" has been -2- 89041,0 completed and the roads accepted for maintenance by the District and final inspections performed on any of the construction which requires building permits. 3.0 Release of Liability: Applicant and District shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any and all liability loss and damage County may suffer as a result of all suits, actions or claims of every nature and description caused by, arising from, or on account of said design and construction of improvements, and pay any and all judgements rendered against the County on account of any such suit, action or claim, together with all reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred by County in defending such suit, action or claim except for liability, loss or damage is caused by, or arises out of the negligence of County or its officers, agents, employees or otherwise while acting within the scope of their employment. Such indemnification shall be subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations of Article 10, Title 24, C.R.S. All contractors and other employees engaged in construction of the improvements shall maintain adequate workman' s compensation insurance and public liability insurance coverage, and shall operate in strict accordance with the Laws and regulations of the State of Colorado governing occupational safety and health. 4.0 County may, at its option, issue building permits for construction on lots for which street improvements detailed herein have been started but not completed as shown on Exhibit "B", and may continue to issue building permits so long as the progress of work on the subdivision improvements in that phase of the development is satisfactory to the County; and all terms of this Agreement have been faithfully kept by Applicant and District. 4.1 Upon completion of the construction of streets within a subdivision and the filing of a Statement of Substantial Compliance, the District may request in writing that the County Engineer inspect its streets for that portion of the work. Not sooner than nine months after the initial inspection the County Engineer shall, upon request by the District, inspect the subject streets, and notify the District of any deficiencies. The County Engineer shall reinspect the streets after notification from the District that any deficiencies have been corrected. If the County Engineer finds that the streets are constructed according to County standards, he shall so recommend and the District shall accept them from the contractors for maintenance by the District. 5.0 General Requirements for Collateral : a) Funds for the interior roads and water distribution system will be segregated and held in the bond proceeds Construction Fund and be disbursed as the work is completed. b) For the telephone and electric services, :advance cash payments will be made by the Applicant to the utility companies involved covering -3- 890410 the total cost of the first phase contracts with each for providing service. The standard utility company land development contracts of U.S. West and Union REA shall provide that the refunds or rebates due to the developer for each line that has been put in service will be paid into an escrow account to be used to pay for additional services as required until all of the platted lots in the Beebe Draw Farms PUD have had service lines extended to them. The Replat shall be recorded within six months of the Final Plat approval . The improvements shall be completed in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit "8" unless the Applicant or the District requests that this Agreement be renewed at least thirty (30) days prior to its expiration and further provides that cost estimates for the remaining improvements are updated and collateral is provided in the amount of 100% of the value of the improvements remaining to be completed. If improvements are not completed and the agreement not renewed within these time frames, the County, at its discretion, may make demand on all or a portion of the Bond Construction Fund and take steps to see that the improvements are made. 5.1 The Applicant may choose to provide for a phased development by means of designating portions of a Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, or Change of Zone, that the Applicant wishes to develop. For the telephone and electric services, the Applicant would need only to provide collateral for the improvements in each portion of the Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, or Change of Zone, and will submit documents which will prohibit the conveyance of the property or the issuance of building permits on said portions until collateral is provided for those portions or until improvements are in place and approved pursuant to the requirements of the County. This paragraph shall be interpreted to allow the tendering of contracts for deed which contain provisions that indicate that utilities and other improvements will not be available to service the lot until a date certain and providing that the actual deed conveying said lots is to be placed in escrow and building permits not be issued until the utilities and improvements are in place or the restrictions are lifted by the County upon a showing that another governmental entity, such as a Metropolitan District, is available to guarantee the construction of the utilities and improvements. 6.0 Improvements Guarantee: If collateral is needed in the future for any work not provided for by the Metropolitan District, the five types of collateral listed below are acceptable to Weld County subject to final approval by the Board of County commissioners. 6.1 An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a Federal or State licensed financial institution on a form approved by Weld County. The -4- 89O41O Letter of Credit shall state at least the following: ▪ The Letter of Credit shall be in an amount equivalent of 100% of the total value of the improvements as set forth in Section 6.0 and exhibits "A" and "8". ▪ The Letter of Credit shall provide for pat ":nt upon demand to Weld County if the developer has not performed the obligations specified in the Improvements Agreement and the issuer has been notified of such default. - The Applicant may draw from the Letter of Credit in accordance with the provisions of this policy. • The issuer of the Letter of Credit shall guarantee that at all times the unreleased portion of the Letter of Credit shall be equal to a minimum of 100% of the estimated costs of completing the uncompleted portions of the required improvements, based on inspections of the development by the issuer. In no case shall disbursement for a general improvement item exceed the cost estimate in the Improvements Agreement (i.e. , streets, sewers, water mains and landscaping, etc.) . The issuer of the Letter of Credit will sign the Improvements Agreement acknowledging the agreement and its cost estimates. - The Letter of Credit shall specify that 15% of the total Letter of Credit amount cannot be drawn upon and will remain available to Weld County until released by Weld County. ▪ The Letter of Credit shall specify that the date of proposed expiration of the Letter of Credit shall be either the date of release by Weld County of the final 15%, or two years from the date of Final Mat approval , whichever occurs first. Said letter shall stipulate that, in any event, the Letter of Credit shall remain in full force and effect until after the Board has received sixty (60) days written notice from the issuer of the Letter of Credit of the pending expiration. Said notice shall be sent by certified mail to the clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. 6.2 Trust Deed upon all or some of the proposed development or other property acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners provided that the following are submitted: In the event property within the proposed development is used as collateral , an appraisal is required of the property in the proposed development by a disinterested M.A.I. member of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers indicating that the value of the property encumbered in its current degree of development is sufficient to cover 100% of the cost of the improvements as set forth in the Improvements Agreement plus all costs of sale of the property. -5- 890410 « In the event property other than the property to be developed has been accepted as collateral by Weld County, then an appraisal is required of the property by a M.A.I. member of the Institute of Real Estate Appraisers indicating that the value of the property encumbered in its current state of development is sufficient to cover 100% of the cost of the improvements as set forth in the Improvements Agreement plus all costs of sale of the property. - A title insurance policy insuring that the Trust Deed creates a valid encumbrances which is senior to all other liens and encumbrances. A building permit hold shall be placed on the encumbered property. 6.3 Escrow Agreement that provides at least the following: - The cash in escrow is at least equal to 100% of the amount specified in the Improvements Agreement. - The escrow agent guarantees that the escrowed funds will be used for improvements as specified in the agreement and for no other purpose and will not release any portion of such funds without prior approval of the Board. - The escrow agent will be a Federal or State licensed bank or financial institution. - If the County of Weld County determines there is a default of the Improvements Agreement, the escrow agent, upon request by the County, shall release any remaining escrowed funds to the County. 6.4 A surety bond given by a corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of Colorado in an amount equivalent to 100% of the value of the improvements as specified in the Improvements Agreement. 6.5 A cash deposit made with the County equivalent to 100% of the value of the improvements. 7.0 County Inspection of Subdivision Improvements: Prior to final approval of the entire project or for a portion of the project by Weld County for maintenance by the District, the District must present a Statement of Substantial Compliance from an Engineer registered in Colorado that the project or a portion of the project has been completed in substantial compliance with approved plans and specifications documenting the following: 7.1 The Engineer or his representative has made regular on-site inspections during the course of construction and the construction plans utilized are the same as those approved by Weld County. -6- 8SO410 7.2 Test results must be submitted for all phases of this project as per Colorado Department of Highway Schedule for minimum materials sampling, testing and inspections found in COON Materials Manual . 7.3 "As built" plans shall be submitted at the time the letter requesting final approval is submitted. The Engineer shall certify that the project "as built" is in substantial compliance with the plans and specifications as approved or that any material deviations have received prior approval from the County Engineer. 7.4 The Statements of Substantial Compliance must be accompanied, if appropriate, by a letter of acceptance of maintenance and responsibility by the appropriate utility company or the District. 7.5 A letter must be submitted from the appropriate Fire Authority indicating the fire hydrants are in place in accordance with the approved plans. The letter shall indicate if the fire hydrants are operational and state the results of fire flow tests. 7.6 The requirements in 8.0 thru 8.5 shall be noted on the final construction plans. 8.0 The obligations of the Applicant and the District hereunder shall not be assigned without the prior written consent of the County, but such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 9.0 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the Applicant and the District, and upon recording by the County, shall be deemed a covenant running with the land herein described, and shall be binding upon the successors in ownership of said land. 10.0 This Agreement is not intended to bestow a third party benefit upon any person not a party to this Agreement with respect to the obligations of the parties hereto nor is it intended to create a standard which may affect third parties. Futhermore, this Agreement is not intended to constitute a waiver of any privileges or immunities held by the parties to this Agreement nor their agents, officers, or employees. -7.- 89041O • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: 1rY192,&v:14 /fit. Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board• SktiK 1 eputyounty � y' APPROVED AS TO FORM:• Are Cetele e-- / ( V/41K V ounty Attorney APPLICANT: BEEBE DIAW FA S, LTD. By: kittic Morris durK; -eneral Partner Subscribed and sworn to before me this fe"* day of 7, (Ng , 1989. My commission expires: 37 / /Q.- `p ary Pu 1 tc ELLIE MOVi I oCKK DISTRICT: BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT ATTEST: { ^f f B ais . ' e1i , P W t resiaent 51 Thomas�Hurk, Se^^^crte—tary 890410 a EXHIBIT "A" PHASE I Name of Subdivision: Beebe Draw Farms & Equestrian Center PUD Filing: Replat of First Location: See Attached Legal Intending to be legally bound, the undersigned Applicant hereby agrees to provide throughout this subdivision and as shown on the subdivision final plat dated , 19 , recorded on , 19 , in Book , vage No. iteception No. tie following improvements. Estimated Improvements Unit Cost Construction Cost Street grading $9 . $30 per linnear foot $509.000 Street base Street paving Culverts Retention ponds Ditch improvements On-site Sewer faci:ities by Home Owners On-site Water supply and storage Water mains 734.000 Fire hydrants Survey & street monuments & boxes Street name signs 64 x S25 1.499 Landscaping 20-040 Park improvements Amenity Buildings and Marina 410-000 Electric Z86.336 Telephone 112.000 SUB-TOTAL 2.17? 936 Engineering and Supervision Costs 90,000 (testing, inspection, as-bunt plans ano work in aaaition to preliminary and final plat; supervision of actual construction by contractors) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SUPERVISION $ 2,262.936 The above improvements shall be constructed in accordance with all County requirements and specifications, and conformance with this provision shall be determined solely by Weld County, or its duly authorized agent. Said improvements shall be completed according to the schedule set out in Exhibit "B". BE DRAW ARMS, LTD. yll 6144 MorP15 {iurK, beneral partner 88041O EXHIBIT "B" PHASE I Name of Subdivision: Beebe Draw Farms & Equestrian Center PUD Filing: Replat of First Location: See Attached Legal Intending to be legally bound, the undersigned Applicant hereby agrees to construct the improvements shown on the final subdivision plat of Replat of First Filing of Beebe Draw Farms Subdivision, dated 19 , Recorded on , 19 , in Book , Page No. , Reception No. , the following schedule. All improvements listed on Exhibit "A" shall be completed within 2 years from the date of the signing of this Agreement. The County, at its option, and upon the request by the Applicant, may grant an extension of time for completion for any particular improvements shown on Exhibit "A" , upon a showing by the Applicant that the above schedule cannot be met. BEEBE AW F RMS, LTD. orris ur , eneral Partner 890 410 RESOLUTION RE: GRANT MOBILE HOME PERMIT NO. 1548 - VICENTE C. MARTINEZ WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, on the 10th day of May, 1989, considered the request of Vicente G. Martinez for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling, and WHEREAS, said mobile home is to be occupied in an A-Agricultural Zone District on a parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: Lot 8 , Block 6 , Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners , having heard the testimony, finds that said request should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain a building permit for the mobile home within thirty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; 2) A septic permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that the Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity and dependability for the proposed use; and 4) The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with the above mentioned conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of Vicente G. Martinez for permission to place a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling on the above described parcel of land, which was found to be in compliance with Section 43 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, be, and hereby is, granted subject to the hereinabove listed conditions. n!/! `C ,In� 890402 Page 2 RE: ZPMR 1548 - MARTINEZ The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTESTAr WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder N( "te ans? Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Cha ' man EXCUSED af f,„,) Jac line Johnson, Pro-Tem }Deputy County Jerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Bran er 74( -4d - - George Ke ne _ County Attorney Gorcldxitiac 4/ `;I 890402. Vim• \ • h � To: Board of County Commissioners N Date: May 10, 1989 ZPMH-1548 Applicant: Vicente C. Martinez This request is for a zoning permit for a mobile home to be used as a principal dwelling. Legal Description of Parcel: Lot 8, Block 6, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately one mile north of the City of Fort Lupton. The Department of Planning Services staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the request be approved for the following reasons: WILL WILL NOT X Be compatible with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. X Be compatible with the surrounding area. X Be in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. X Adversely affect the immediate area. X Be adequately served by water and sewage disposal facilities. X Adversely affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. COMMENTS: The applicant did not submit a petition for this proposal. Water for the mobile home will be provided by Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project. A septic system is proposed for the sewage disposal system. The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant obtaining a building permit for the mobile home within thirty (30) days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A septic permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit. 890402 Board of County Commissioners ZPMH-1548 Page 2 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner shall submit evidence that Aristocrat Ranchettes Water Project is supplying water in such a manner as to be adequate in quality, quantity, and dependability for the proposed use. 4. The mobile home shall not be occupied until such time that the applicant has complied with Conditions 1, 2, and 3 above. f j 6 '' Curren P anner / ornate 890402 J �1. 2O g �1� N' . ( i 21 22 - '•,� 23 aiZ -- .66A n. • PI .--L \ - ) 1 ,t �L ^ � - \J $ • 1e ms 20 4900 ` s,_• l ., OC" ream '.�`� _ ._.� ._ _ \ • -�--.- - - Ni v=_- --" :i979• \+ \ .060 z7 i 'P0r[er Sch• _ •,yr1 _\ jA�� , 1 G� /, J,N]/�__ a960` Ogg? Ic l •{ I? 5 V/ l--•"--/fei.. I \ '' ol l\>28 1 27 i'1 / 4460 N a96 __ (4996 C - ,• :.. • • -'.1. �M 4892 - n- n' Y. w., - .n.al--- - . . , i ^'' ''~SOSC.-. a 1 - 1 • • i e • ' 0 , , . - / Obi / 1 - 1/ 41 "'°'• - �.. - O`33 34\ J 35 u • - �/ it • 4906 •II •90? . . C - e.99P _ _ ..__ }, ) 4 ▪7' ..\:7 , • :kV / I ' a •..... .:ii /�'• i �;Fort Lupton `, s • �•x :BF , :J : 4u.9. • ` . 3 -. 20 ,;5 \ ;1 v -95G CWmbm l _ ao I \ \ n9sa /.44-24 :I. mucks y 904 - / -n / S Sir ! fsf. Fline 1.�� O. 1 A MIK ---- --- Y a 3 t JIt4 a l 71. l i a J 2 I La 3 2 I { 3 2 1 z ` I -1 ° � k5 I.6f„.2 7. B L _ 2 I : C _ ` : I_. __ _ 11 eIl sk '' 7 r-5-0.5 _1 8 L 1 6 T f B ts T :l:B J L3_1' 1 I n a 2 or I { I.=8 z I 1 1. ]: x 1III.1__ I e 5 I no . '__� l 11 . . ._J LL...L DAL J. � IIrr._.qVE 1:32p.•3121 . -1B-Ri _ 1 �� S 6 7 B I I.6_ T B f 16 T 6 3 3 6 l \6 t T. I .B I -3 1. __ _ ft L • If I I LL. {I I . — I j I. _ _ IJU I4 I1 + � •J '' 2 .I—'� I + I J ,1-•2_1 � L-1.F.II Z � L'_ ?. l _I �I� _�� l__1 �-I f I I { 2 I i 2II it iii; j I _-N�. 6—L,�.8 I LS i 6_I 7 g� L_ (.6 7_�B l _NA CT. _ ._l B S—l��Q I B I l-3_ __ { S 2 '. I { 3 r t n raT31--2-17-1 a J 2 1 !`I 2 •r i-, 2 41 • • El I - I i __ 1 I-_ -14�_ �_ 1 5 I 6 7 S 5 r 6 7� 8 r S ff I • F I d 3 f 7 a T ! 4 1 L_ __L_ Pi15 T#1�RAif_1 RIANCI�ETTE65 1 7 �B�-�2! I _. � I 1 __.l I �_ 1 111I!} MI1yµE JI1I I — _3_ IIC _ JIII1T _ r�Scl 1 S 6� ' ��_s l_5_iii..ii.—_--- __2 61 T l B 1�.,- 62T 1 a 1 S 6 Te I 3 4 ��_ j 4oct 1pst q_s_4 2 1 4 I21 r 4427137.1 + s a a \ 1 -- -. 3rd Filinq RISffT0CRAT{7 RAiNCHE g _ _S '6 S - _B_� � S a �5 I_6 i42_11 _. _ � r_1 6 � I4 134211lI 4 74-2 1 I I i• 4 581 i. 2 1 1 i= - I - 3 , 1 z -1— 1 1 a O2 1 4_13: e1z 1 - _ `yf I{r '`I{r }I 1_3 itTIE -]+1_. 3 4L'_1 61 78�~ 56 17 1._8_ 56_ 7B_ S 6__ 7 6 ] 4 L3_ 6 78 5 6 T 6 1 �S ! I..�� ,_�I_ -1---I- .,_._ E£a ___._ — -- _ _.. - _ - .13 3 _ CAS_ER. At - -JJJ 11re r �� \ -2 1---I- a_ ._3 j11 4 �—Iir'1 _ 1 2I 1_114_I g73 1_2�I! r .._S. '_ N 4 3.7 _ Ili Js 67 1 I 49 X43 «! V y 1_ 3 4 S 5 6 T 8 3 6 7 6 5 Si 6 5 6 T 6 6 6 7 a S 6 7 ! 6 6 7 S 6 I 1 a -- I .__ __1U ___ — �__ -._..'l __ ___ .,FI A,1121tK I((- _—_ aM� �I 1 HI: 3 � 2 t , ¢ { J 2I > 1 ] 2 l { 2 1 1 2 1 ! 2 1 {_ x 54P5 -� J: - 5� - a/1 .5I I.8 & 5� 67T ` __.l ] s 6 II 4 5 1 6 r B 56 7B i 56 7 8 - r - IC 0 MAJ3 l _._ _� E__ __ r_I ;). __. _/ __. .._ _ _ c___ _— ___ _ r-�' I `1I '!r`T` I1}t 2 _ --'-- - I- 4 S 2 1 4 3 2 I Ic2 1 T 1X11..3 _6rJ�7 _I 6 I�S�_ t 65! T 1_e� � SEi65 r �_e� _6_ 87 _ 5_ 65 4 [ 3 132 � B1 6 6 27 } 6 � 6 67 T Dtii !J` 61�6/ * _ _•AvTrscl / S2 1 4 a 2 11 2 1 4 3 2 1 { 3 I IB�] I1I sTIf16 — 6 —N IIrF 4 +III6I2p17I Bi �J�V 16 L,B 5_�.6_ ,1—L ± -- � 6 . �Bil 5 16 _ k. , I . 1fl±flBST° L 661 7 6 1 2nd Filing 5 8 5//3 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: ZP.NH-1548 DATE OF INSPECTION: May 1, 1989 NAME: Vicente G. Martinez REQUEST: Zoning Permit for a Mobile Home to be used as a principal dwelling LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 6, Aristocrat Ranchettes Subdivision, Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: The northwest corner of Harold Street and Morris Avenue LAND USE: N Vacant land E Harold Street, mobile home S Morris Avenue W Vacant land ZONING: N A (Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: The property is in natural grass and has no improvements at this time. The property slopes from the north down to the south with the access being located on Morris Avenue. A public notice sign is posted on the property. By: 1,10C10070/4 K thuett Current Planner 890402 915 10th Street MOBILE HOME Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone 356-4000 Ext. 4400 IN2GICANT - Complete all items on both sides. Mark boxes where applicable. APPLICANT /" if /� e A! / E �, /BAR unee Z PHONE ,PSri- 7G9 / ADDRESS �� /5.23 �. N ,'�✓A �! S� �'d47 i Lut! a^ dG / OWNER A PHONE %/ A ADDRESS CITY - STATE - ZIP LOT LOCK UBDIVIS�J,ON I P I ,K �19�14r1 Del!fu %CAF/S} J'. tvd . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section 24_ , T 2 N, Rho W. Total Acreage Application for zoning permit is made for: Staff Approval Board of County Commissioners Approval O Temporary Use During Construction Use Beyond 18 months During Construction of a residence of a residence O Temporary Storage ❑ Extension Beyond 6 months for Temporary Storage ❑ Accessory to Farm ❑ More than one MB as Accessory to Farm © Accessory Use as an Office ❑ More than one MN as Accessory Use as Q Accessory Use in C or I Zone District an Office ❑ More than one ME as Accessory Use in 0 Accessory Structure C or I Zone District 0 Temporary Use during Medical Hardship ❑ More than one accessory structure ® Principal Dwelling The above requires an Application fee of The above requires at Application fee of $75.00 $125.00 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Public or private company: ® Public or private company: 17 (tilt P T!✓ . La Septic Tank - Permit 0(41OO,y O Individual (well, cistern) Well Permit 0 Copy Attached: Yes ® No ❑ Coin Attached: Yes O No Q DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY ZONING DISTRICT (ZONING PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FEE PAID (RECEIPT NUMBER (DATE ICHAINDEXED APPROVED BY: ED Staff E Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date ISSUED SY: DATE { MOBILE HOME BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER DATE ISSUED 890402 WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 TENTH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 SIR: REASON FOR APPLYING FOR A ZONING PERMIT FOR A MOBILE HOME ON LOT 8 BLOCK 6 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES INC. SUBDIVISION ALSO KNOWN BY STREET AND NUMBER AS 15203 MORRIS AVE. IS TO IMPROVE THE VACANT 'LAND A PRINCIPAL DWELLING. VICENTE G.MARTTNEZ 15236 HIWAY 52 FORT LUPTON CO. 80621 (303) 857-2091 890132 1 % W i { R 4 i s - .n- ^ \N M ? + t i c t • M SK) k Ze • o Z'A 6` Y b. -A � � M a' ' • I `, Q f?a /0/ f / /G/ 8904`:2 ; i , '1 •)r,l' APPLICATION -r INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL ;, ,.EM : ' ' '.111 .vdi7lr lL .,,"'%J.�I"11.. SYSTEM i_I iG(i.. &-2390&S; WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD . (:GRcELEY . CO EfO6:3i 35306:3 EX T.2225 ,-,1 •,;,R ,...,.NE_., ,IC ... : ..,r�!w...:� f`1r•Ih I .L Ivt:.[. • 4',.LL;,i�+�l L. ADDRESS i5236 r•IWY .):.. F'i-! C,,0. 1 85r-•r:Ci•;� TORT LUPTON CO 20621 ADDRESS O ... P,.,,..1.; :, 520 ° MORRIS AVENUE .LI�L..us 1..I• PROPOSED .>Y.i fi::M 1 .,�...,.a M n�ti..,S Av�NU,_. FORT LU['TON CO 20621 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE : SEC 26 TWP 2 RNG 66 SUBDIVISION : ARISTOCRAT RANO1-1i_TTIS$ LOT B BLOCI( 6 FILING 0 U 11 TYPE ! RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME �q :+:I:C:Iii:iS : PERSONS ;3 BATHROOMS 2.00 LOT SIZE 1 .00 ACRES BEDROOMS BASEMENT PLUMBING W ._.U.. I'' v 3 NO WATER SUPPLY.._ 1 r`l i^:.i..:; I I'La ..iliJ': ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE COMPLETENESS OL.. .. APPLICATION •S :.i TION^1 I (. I'! rr •f..i. nT:il]I� L ;iiX) L'1 .. .1 1. _. ':J'v FURTHER MANDATORY AND ADDITIONAL TEE..r' AND REPORTS As, '1A'`( 'I SE REQUIRED BY THE !.,-.(; COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO BE MADE AND FURNISHED BY THE A.^ L I Ci 11U I OR BY TH 1 - .. 1 HEALTH,•, .. . „,-S THE EVALUATION I . , I 1 L.J; .,11.)IV'!": L;1 ivl.. :•,l DEPARTMENT FOR PURPOSES OF : .. Gvill_lJr"II IiJP! OF „1:.. 1'ii ._ I (.,i=1 . ... 1 , v .. . ... T SUCH CONDITIONS .,, 1 ... ISSUANCE 1.11• 1111_, 'PERMIT IS SUBJECT f.7 1. . `.> r ..l� TERMS 111?V 1'I:, DEEMED . .. _., ,.. ,...,.. „ G 1 UNDER . . .,. ..:. ..l . ;'i(•+Itl TO INSURE COMPLIANCE iv 1. 131 r1 L11_i::,a. 6.11JCi REGULATIONS 1.,!_f"II a(JN) ADOPTED 4.I pi l/�'.•1, iir: � . .,-.-,- .. -. .. , 1 ' . TITLE ,E..Y 111,= r > rC� , AS AMENDED . 11'111 APPLICANT l,i_I ' � .. ,.1._S THAT THE I .'S�_...,., SIS : r WJ.'.'1_. Ni '",' X•.il. LOCATED WITHIN /ii,t. IA:.k.T OF a COMMUNITY ,alcwf-li. l.. ..>Y:. ...il. , :!!:. !:EilSllvNL..t) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE , INFORMATION AND , .. r-f,'JT;", ZJa5Pi:I I ED HEREWITH AND REQUIRED .f(1 BE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT ANT ARE .. GR BE , REPRESENTED 1 ' 1 BE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEET Or M`1 KNOWLEDGE AND :'c: . F AND .... . _E .. .. N - .. ._ ',;.. DESIGNED TO A,.[' RELIED 1_l/ U14 BY THE WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT IN ,...W hi_,1!A 1 .. THa SAE FOR PURPOSES OF ISSUING THE PERMIT APPLIED FOR HERE:N . I u I 1u'.iTl THAT ANY a, FALSIFICATION ORLi MISREPRESENTATION MAY RESULT .A,J .+G" DENIAL OF �' ,::. .1„IY� .,!id ORI,L:; .REVOCATION l.1N OF ANY PERMIT J. , GRANTED T) ..r1..,,._1) UPON N ..AID 'i I•L.,...A1 , IJ'.0 1, GA_. ACTION FOR I•'[iF .A 11 1' AS PROVIDED ::+Y LAW. , 1 q .t. FE: �r ...N A. Z 1 .....1 � '.(]V $150 .00 bJ.I I:VTi G . III\ ( IJ a.. p�' , O 1. AT: 04/26/39 OWNER/AGENT SIGNATURE 1J,A _. 890402 TMAI ....r.@c4 Tr'nu'r• . r•niv..,.cr'un hirWf-• H.. NAY _ 4984 _ _A Date /11 ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES WATER PROJECT Inc. 15841 Dale Ave. Ft. Lupton, Colorado 80621 Greetings; This is to confirm that there is a working water tap on BLOCK 6 LOT 21 If you have any questions, please call the bookkeeper at 857-4210. • Thank you, OPEIOU #5 Waa't 1141,46; ;�� SJT 7-87 V 89®4^'2 B 1186 REC 02131584 02/22/88 11:58 $3.00 1/001 AR2131584 F 0501 MARX ANN FEGERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO WARRANTY DEED • THIS DEED, Made this 19th day of FEBRUARY • State entory Fee ' ng8 , between PHYLLIS J. WILLIAMS De.:e Lys$ _.. e.GD of the `County of ylinD and State of Colorado.grantor,and VICDITE G. MARTINEZ GF.RALDENT C. MARTIt�'EZ whose legal address is 15236 HIWAY 52, FORT LUPTON,CO 80621 of the County of WELD and State of Colorado.grantees: WITNESS,that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of **($16,000.00)** **STXTEE'N THOUSAND DOLLARS AND No/l0oths*** DOLLARS. the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,has granted.bargained,sold and conveyed.and by these presents does grant.bargain,sell,convey and confirm unto the grantees,their heirs and assigns forever,not in tenancy in common but in joint tenancy, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of WELD and State of Colorado,described as follows: LOPS 1,2,7 and 8, BLOC( 6, ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES INC. SUBDIVISION �\ r A SUBDIVISION OF WELD COUNTY c(2) also known by street and number as VACANT LAND TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging,or in anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders,rents,issues and profits thereof,and all the estate,right,title.interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the grantees.their heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself,his heirs and personal representatives,does covenant,grant,bargain and agree to and with the grantees,their heirs and assigns,that at the time of the enscaling and delivery of these presents,he is well seized of the premises above conveyed.has good. sure,perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and has good right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid,and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants,bargains,sales, liens,taxes,assessments,encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except the general real estate taxes and assessments for 1988 and subsequent years;reservations, restrictions, easements and rights of way of record if any. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantees. their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof The singular number shall include the plural,the plural the singular.and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. PHSt�i.IS J/ LLIAMS STATE OF COLORADO s,. County of WELD 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19th day of FEBRUARY , 1989 , by PHYLLIS J. WILLIAMS Witness my hand and official seal. My Commisison expires 8/27/89 ,19 • i e •rr,'�4711 Le •i� A A A(A / ��j� t9 nr.n• Pobpr ✓// J1 1800 LAWRENCE ST., DdiKER, CO *If in DenV 1nVeielF1t�tQ. P Nof;9 :'Reiz3;01,erNMpb'9'FB r0,8taryfo po &.dfard Publishing.sets W.ern Ave,.! kewed.CO 80:14—OW.^434900 B-!e 89G40 2 NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # V,cEtdT /17PR1rr ,�?/f.Ni . ..rh re, Cn , =1On ' .(-U5_ G:.:/ TG/✓ ^ ?lcc.^ ,a3 F� reTN / � /'7•',.n./}JL 0_,/,_I 91-s- 73- 1 X307, .P ,Sac tz%w• '°=-•e'eri, ...b'i.,/✓ I',. /,54$?i,2-.7.5.4c2 U/+'rf'77./-736t L O /Cc 7 M/..z.R it, '' 'rr, rT l.• +, r , / G- -:^-'7-i/^-cr / ,r,e,^ PTA t ./ /r/ 13 i.-t::2niv11-r:te�/ .. -J, r � lJ _VI- 2-(D - ®'G.f • C.T/`�,& F/✓1AR,�1= / K^ Z/, b/. lay c-� 4n-.i:r ,/. . ✓ e .7 / j ,J1-r7- ."-. Oc re: C.Erf77,7 ,'n,f:2 , F/; Lay. Sn {te;ter/4/AI / 3.74 _ .x.7-. ^.JTG/G(p /rRi1 ;,./i CQ 0,729 A . ? tm n i /0,33- ,. 4 /Y '?-. .27- -,. / �t ,z ;i/ L/_.. ,✓ A ?,. „ '.. / F. 74/:,l r/OCr AL / ^.y-7 do �n/I///c[.,yr/ A. 7 o. /3vv ,.O /'!;-,✓„IA II 4--v. / 3a ' r<rs.// L6or../ A 17a. <sn., /Lr-7�//Ne/n/ r /".:. i3..^ 7-a7. "- ^/. '�- n../nr.,•/!? '27 /?, r a:X // S•/ 'Den/ l'. /''., / 7i G '7-.7- v -G/.,-c70 , ,/J/'7n 47014nr v✓. ,.T//. / ')A/ r pvr L.a p/ :✓ /.'.:•. /'•',79-7 %-.2-G'C,'U Q.,/ J�- I' A " !-'F,_rZ 7.r9c.4/Air; l//f Crate,rr�,., C • ^A-r7_.--0 G-ovr, ti nom. . r r/' T. / `J,F4�i./a•;r ,/r.*octrGu .-.i.. ,,, 1'.. / 4/47 42 7-.�.-lJ 4n'GG� //J/%/r Z .cc '.T / G��U/�✓�7'Ir-r nr �: / �ri -.n7 +- Gi'UV/ Att,,✓c r F2fi/ /6 ,P .r It' A ? . / ."s O47 7- .7 J J-c':, -7)A1;- i'�. .., alri2 , C3S !I:11/.1-2,4,7:r,e'., / .iG9_^- " •- Ir:r „f 1-7,..c-4,/ 'PVC/ /./A2,' %C1 r�i/U r. n/ rn ?Oq-27 :-v R.,.", le - hr a i c ! 917gGt AFit7e/N , ,Cd . ! ^ c9- 27 -a?-...Tv .3 G / )r/Cr f/ Z:4'VA !/ir nrl l/+ % �l LU•D !.-rN en , I. rp 7_09- ^_vG/V/ .3.N rAN ALA A0./Tan/. 7/',' 7i /. J/A^ ,. l.JtYit„p ". r. 11 !:4-27 -C„i-/i C,1Z vz //_ ,,, W, 70. .mac, v del , v✓r'.'lMirJ.r :7 C'. ! ' ,/'?_ r9- -UL- ut/ 7 4 //,-/- Ar Zr CE':7 :re . /5-313t/'V./C/dra'7d /.r"I .L .r/u.vC'., /i47-.2 .fA/v�;/ ," ✓a//S,,re 7?o ^,?a X '/ 7//i rT//,•,/- c a 7 ,22-4-^c/ n r. ,/ /a .,'�u!-� ,.C79 .'i /».-,TI/ e'\^/'=-1°/rLur-; C,, , =,u9-;7-'�- 8904: _ �-yc9 C'�'LN A//7/',Cy EI. 0. '73OX ySiu93 17f7a.7-12O:LA ra / 30rI- 0?. 4.2-4.9 .� /9//Q•e * 6 C..yR. /SJ3vh' I.dC.d .'zei /.7' rwt,,a/a/Jr:.- / 3u7-.;.7-..�_G�-Oc,(„ • • :,1./, • ,.+z c�J G G/ / %3/t/c,///u.,7.%/d �.:r)/�` --,, Ct % /jC 7.r'��`- � i r� z� rr ^ /ahE'f.:�f, /S��7risCg /J — 2 =— C AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) as. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn. states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (S00) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld Coutty Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. I �• • / J �•v vIlle-Ygesering instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this zrolt dAfofirAPt WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: My Crela<en Explrec Feb. 13. ?Q93 i\ \\c-':. . or•-•\ Notary Public 890402 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE CONTINUANCE OF SHOW CAUSE HEARING - HOWARD DUCKWORTH, DRA WELD COUNTY DISPOSAL, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 10th day of May, 1989, at the hour of 10:00 a .m. , in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the revocation of Special Use Permit #454 , granted to Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. , and WHEREAS, the Board was informed that the aerator system was not totally installed and operational; therefore the facility was still not in compliance, and WHEREAS, after hearing the testimony presented, the Board deemed it advisable to continue said hearing to May 17, 1989, at 10:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hearing to Show Cause concerning Special Use Permit #454, granted to Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. , be, and hereby is, continued to May 17 , 1989, at 10:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1959. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: &a WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Cha4iman EXCUSED BY.• �1vr4< c l xx��+, .�, 4,, line Johnson, Pro-Tem eputy County Clerk JJ . � r APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Bran nez George K n County Attorney Gond. /.i 7 j /2' �'.�"t �'�L' 890407 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH FT. LUPTON CANNING COMPANY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN NECESSARY DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Agreement with the Ft. Lupton Canning Company, and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions are as stated in said Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, after study and review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Agreement with the Ft. Lupton Canning Company be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said Agreement and other necessary documents. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989 . /� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: � � WELD COUNTY, COOLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder /�� and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, C irman ' N4 (--;7 EXCUSED $Y.• c'�.,�� ,. ,f;,,--, ,, / Ja line Johnson, Pro-Tem .erk �te Tuty County 1/ 4 .6c/ ` APPROVED AS TO FORM: Genteel R. Brantner George K County Attorney Co �1 irk✓Jr�w % �, . ��n ;;�y,�. i /r "�� 390409 COMM cr 3;Fir OF CJLO?&b3 STANDARD AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,• made and entered into this day of . , 19 , by and between the COUNTY OF WELD, State of Colorado, hereinafter called. the . County, and Ft. Lupton Canning Company hereina to called the Contractor. WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration Of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the County hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree' to. furnish to the County services and materials, as follows, and/or as described on exhibits attached to and incorporated herein. (Set forth service to be rendered by Contractor, County Department receiving service, Contractor's qualifications, and additional provisions incorporated. ) Ft. Lupton Canning Company shall direct the project grant attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. . Ft. Lupton Canning Company shall direct all parties providing in-kind services as part of this grant. Ft. Lupton Canning Company shall be responsible for filing all necessary reporting requirements for state compliance and reimbursement per the grant documents (Exhibit A) . • • • • • • CONTRACT PERIOD will be from May 10, 1989 - - — through . June 30, 1990 COMPENSATION: County agrees to pay Contractor for services performed hereunder at a rate of $ xXX ,^ per ...... XXX _._ and/or . $15,000.00 as reimbursed er state contract attached hereto as Exhibit A. The total amount paid by County to Contractor under this agreement shall not exceed the sum of $ 15,000.00 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS set forth on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF WELD CONTRACTOR By � _,__• _ Ft. L n_canni.na Company ha man , Board County Commissioners By • Title ze.,8 ✓!_— ?T 4d 4-# Z� A�prov-F1s Farmi - "� ddress Lr • urc n - • /1; • Di r of 1Rahce • ( Admi ni strati on 8904C9 • 5511 or E.I.N. • ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 1. Contractor agrees that it is an independent Contractor and that its officers and employees do not become employees of County nor are the entitled to any employees benefits as County employees as a result of the execution of this agreement. 2. Contractor shall indemnify County, its officers end employees against liability for injury or damage caused by any negligent act or omission of any of its employees or volunteers or agents in the performance of this agreement and shall hold County harmless from any loos occasioned as a result of the performance of this contract by Contractor. The Contractor shall provide necessary workman's compensation insurance at Contractor's own cost and expense. 3. No officer, member or employee of County and no member of their gcverning bodies shall have any pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, iu this agreement or the proceeds thereof. No employe of Contractor nor any member of an employee's family shall serve on a County board, committee or hold any such position which either by rule, practice or action nominates, recommends, supervises Contractor's operations, or authorizes funding to Contractor. 4. Contractor may not assign or transfer this agreement, any interest therein or claim thereunder without the prior written approval of - County. 5. Payment to Contractor will be made only upon presentation of n proper claim by Contractor subject to the approval of the County Department or Agency for which the services have been performed. 6. County shall have access to Centractor'u financial records for - purposes ofaudit. Such records shall he complete and available for audit 90 days after final payment hereunder and shall be retained and available for audit purposes for five years after final payment hereunder. 7. County may terminate this agreement nt any time by giving Contractor a ten day written notice of such sooner termination and may he terminated at any time without notice upon a material breach of the terms of this agreement by Contractor. 8. Time is of the essence in each and all the provisions of this agreement. 9. No alteration or variation of the terns of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 10. Contractor assures that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and that no person shall, un the groundn of race, creed, color. sex or national origin be excluded from partici.pttion in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to diucrimination under this agreement. • • 8904,'x`9 s IULM_AWIMtNI us A(a©cY NUMtlt$ E D.C. egg-049/Ag 00 \C ONTRAct ROUTING NUMBER I Rai -- in THIS CONTRACT, made this day of ` / ( Not 1989, by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Department of Local Affairs. 1313 Shermall Street. Perrier. CO -r102Q3 hereinafter referred to as the State, and Weld County Board of County Commissioners, 915 10th St. Greeley Colo, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor. WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number a, G/L Account Number f 3'j9Contract Encumbrance Number C bSYL2U; and WHEREAS,required approval,clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate agencies; and WHEREAS, the State desires to promote economic development in Colorado by assisting local communities in expanding their economic base: and WHEREAS,pursuant to 24-46-101 to 105,C.R.S. 1987,the Colorado Economic Development Fund is created, and is to be administered by the Department of Local Affairs: and WHEREAS,applications for distributions from the Colorado Economic Development Fund have been received by the Economic Development Commission; and WHEREAS,the Economic Development Commission has reviewed and recommended to the Governor that the project described in this contract be financed with a grant: and WHEREAS, the Governor has authorized expenditure of money from the Economic Development Fund to finance the project described in this contract; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is an eligible recipient of Colorado Economic Development funds: NOW THEREFORE it is hereby agreed that: 1. Area Covered. The Contractor shall perform and accomplish all the necessary work and services provided under this Contract,as described in the attached Exhibit A,which is incorporated herein and made part of this Contract by reference, in connection with and respecting the following area or areas: Weld County . 2. Scope of Services. In consideration for the monies to be received from the State,the Contractor shall do, perform, and carry out, in a satisfactory and proper manner, as determined by the State,all work elements as indicated in the"Scope of Services", set forth in the Attached Exhibit A, hereinafter referred to as the'Project". Work performed prior to the execution of this Contract shall not be considered part of this Project. 3. Responsible Administrator. The performance of the services required hereunder shall be under the direct supervision of Don Warden . an employee or agent of Contractor, who Is hereby designated as the admini- strator-in-charge of this Project. At any time the administrator-in-charge is not assigned to this Project.all work shall be suspended until the Contractor assigns a mutually acceptable replacement administrator-in-charge and the State receives notification of such replacement assignment, Page 1 of 7 Pages 890409 4, Time of Perfgrmgnpe. This Contract shall become effective upon proper execution of this Contract. The Project contemplated herein shall commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Contract and shall be undertaken and performed in the sequence set forth in the Time of Performance in the attached Exhibit A. No Economic Development Commission Funds provided under this contract will be expended prior to the full execution of this grant contract. The Contractor agrees that time is of the essence In the performance of its obligations under this Contract, and that completion of the Project shall occur no later than the termination date set forth in the Time of Performance.' 5, Compensation and Method of Payment, The State agrees to pay to the Contractor, in consideration for the work and services to be performed, a total amount not to exceed FIFTFFN THOIJSAdD AND NO/100 D0I I ARS j 15,LOCI The method and time of payment shall be made in accordance with the 'Payment Schedule' set forth in Exhibit A. 6. Accounting. At all times from the effective date of this Contract until completion of this Project. the Contractor shall maintain properly segregated books of State funds, matching funds. and other funds associated with this Project. All receipts and expenditures associated with said Project shall be documented in a detailed and specific manner,and shall accord with the'Budget"set forth in Exhibit A. Contractor may adjust budgeted expenditure amounts up to ten percent (10%)within said Budget without approval of the State. Adjustments of budget expenditure amounts in excess of ten percent(10%) must be authorized by the State in an amendment to this Contract properly executed and approved pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. In no event shall the State's total consideration exceed the amount shown in Paragraph 5 above. a. Unless otherwise provided in this Contract, if Exhibit A provides for more than one payment by the State,the initial payment set forth in the Payment Schedule shall be made as soon as practicable after proper execution of this Contract. The Contractor shall initiate all subsequent payment requests by submitting documented proof of proper expenditure of State funds thus far received to a contract monitor designated by the State. b. The Contractor shall request the final payment, which is the amount withheld by the State until the Project is complete,for the Project by submitting to the contract monitor a detailed cost accounting of all State funds received and expended towards completion of the Project. Upon determining to its satisfaction that all funds received by the Contractor have been properly spent towards accomplishment of the Project,the State shall promptly make final payment to the Contractor. c. Within ninety(90)days of completion of the Project.the Contractor shall submit to the Contract monitor a detailed cost accounting of expenditures of the final payment received from the State. Any State funds not expended in connection with the Project shall be remitted to the State at that time. 7. Audit. The State or its authorized representative shall have the right to inspect, examine, and audit Contractor's records, books and accounts, including the right to hire an independent Certified Public Accountant of the State's choosing and at the State's expense to do so. Such discretionary audit may be called for at any time and for any reason from the effective date of this Contract until five (5) years after the date final payment for this Project is received by the Contractor.provided that the audit Is performed at a time convenient to the Contractor and during regular business hours. Whether or not the State calls for a discretionary audit as provided for in this paragraph, if the Project is accomplished within a single fiscal year of the Contractor,the Contractor shall,at the con-elusion of the Project,and in addition to any other reports required.submit a report and auditor's statement of the Project account to the Economic Development Commission in the Department of Local Affairs. Such report shall be prepared in conjunction with Contractor's regular yearly audit, and must be submitted within six (6) months after the close of the then current Contractor's fiscal year. 8. Pelsonr gl. The Contractor represents that he has, or will secure at his own expense, unless otherwise stated in Exhibit A, all personnel,as employees of the Contractor, necessary to perform the work and services required to be performed by the Contractor under this Contract. Such personnel may not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the State. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Contractor or Page 2 of 7 Pages 890409 under his supervision,and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under State and local law to perform such services. 9. Termination of contract for Cam. If,through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this Contract, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants. agreements. or stipulations of this Contract, the State shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Contract (or cause by giving written notice to the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof,at least five(5)days before the effective date of such termination. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the State for any damages sustained by the State by virtue of any breach of the Contract by the Contractor, and the State may withhold any payments to the Contractor for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the State from the Contractor is determined. 10. Termination for Convenience of Starg, The State may terminate this Contract at any time the Stare determines that the purposes of the distribution of State monies under the Contract would no longer be served by completion of the Project. The State shall effect such termination by giving written notice of termination to the Contractor and specifying the effective date thereof, at least twenty(20)days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in Paragraph 9 above shall, at the option of the state, become its property. If the Contract is terminated by the State as provided herein, the Contractor will be paid an amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation as the services actually performed bear to the total services of the Contractor covered by this Contract,less payments of compensation previously made:Provided,however, that if less than sixty percent(60%)of the services covered by this Contract have been performed upon the effective date of such termination,the Contractor shall be reimbursed (in addition to the above payment)for that portion of the actual out-of-pocket expenses (not otherwise reimbursed under this Contract) incurred by the Contractor during the Contract period which are directly attributable to the uncompleted portion of the services covered by this Contract. If this Contract is terminated due to the fault of the Contractor, Paragraph 9 hereof relative to termination shall apply. 11. Chances. The State may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services of the Contract to be performed hereunder. However,this Contract is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties, at this time,and no prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect, whatsoever, unless embodied in a written contract amendment incorporating such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of monies to be paid to the Contractor, executed and approved pursuant to the State's Fiscal Rules. 12, Reports. At least two (2) copies of all reports prepared as a result of the Project will be submitted to the Economic Development Commission In the Department of Local Affairs within two (2) weeks of completion of such reports. 13. Conflict of Interest. a. No employee of the Contractor shall perform or provide part-time services for compensation. monetary or otherwise, to a consultant or consultant firm that has been retained by the Contractor under the authority of this Contract. b. The Contractor agrees that no person at any time exercising any function or responsibility, in connection with the elements of this project that are financed with State funds, on behalf of the Contractor shall have or acquire any personal financial or economic interest, direct or indirect, which will be materially affected by this Contract, except to the extent that he may receive compensation for his performance pursuant to this Contract. c. A personal financial or economic interest includes, but is not limited to: i) any business entity in which the person has a direct or indirect monetary Interest; any real property In which the person has a direct or indirect monetary interest: Page 3 of 7 Pages $904119 • • iii) any source of income,loans,or gifts received by or promised to the person within twelve (12) months prior to the execution date of this Contract; iv) any business entity in which the person is a director, officer, general or limited partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. For purposes of this subsection, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse, parent. brother,sister, son, daughter, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law. son-in-law, or daughter-In-law of the person by an agent on his/her behalf, by a general, limited, or silent partner of the person, by any business entity controlled by said person, or by a trust in which he/she has substantial interest. A business entity is controlled by a person if that person, his/her agent, or a relative as defined above possesses more than fifty percent (50%) of the ownership interest, Said person has a substantial economic interest in a trust when the person or an above-defined relative has a present or future interest worth more than One Thousand Dollars (51,000.00). d• In the event a conflict of interest,as described in this Paragraph 13,cannot be avoided without frustrating the purposes of this Contract,the person involved in such a conflict of interest shall submit to the Contractor and the State a full disclosure statement setting forth the details of such conflict of interest. In cases of extreme and unacceptable conflicts of interest, as determined by the State, the State reserves the right to terminate the Contract for cause, as provided in Paragraph 9 above. Failure to file a disclosure statement required by this Paragraph 13 shall constitute grounds for termination of this Contract for cause by the State. 14. Compliance with Applicable Laws. At all times during the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and State laws that have been or may hereafter be established. 15. Severabilitx, to the extent that this Contract may be executed and performance of the obligations of the parties may be accomplished within the Intent of the Contract,the terms of this Contract are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared Invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as waiver of any other term. 16. Binding on Successors. Except as herein otherwise provided, this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties, or any subcontractors hereto, and their respective successors and assigns. 17. Assignment. Neither party, nor any subcontractors hereto, may assign its rights or duties under this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party. 18, Limitation to Particular Fund@. The parties hereto expressly recognize that the Contractor is to be paid, reimbursed,or otherwise compensated with funds provided to the State for the purpose of contracting for the services provided for herein,and therefore,the Contractor expressly understands and agrees that all its rights,demands and claims to compensation arising under this Contract are contingent upon receipt of such funds by the State. In the event that such funds or any part thereof are not received by the State.the State may immediately terminate this Contract. 19. Minority Business Enterprise Participation. It is the policy of the State of Colorado that minority business enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of its construction grant contracts. The Contractor agrees to use its best efforts to carry out this policy to the fullest extent practicable and consistent with the efficient performance of this Contract. As used in this Contract, the term 'minority business enterprise' means a business,at least 50 percent (50%) of which Is owned by minority group members or, in the case of publicly owned businesses, at least 51 percent (51%) of the stock of which is owned by minority group members. For the purposes of this definition, minority group members are Negroes or Black Americans. Spanish-speaking Americans, Asian Americans,American Indians, American Eskimos and American Aleuts. The Contractor may rely on written representations by bidders, contractors, and subcontractors regarding their status as minority enterprises and need not conduct an independent investigation. Page 4 of 7 Pages 890409 i 20. Workmen's CpmoensatlQn Coveraa0. The Contractor is responsible for providing Workmen's Compensation Coverage for all of its employees to the extent required by law, and for providing such coverage or requiring its subcontractors to provide such coverage for the subcontractor's employees. In no case is the State responsible for providing Workmen's Compensation Coverage for any employees or subcontractors of Contractor pursuant to this Agreement,and Contractor agrees to indemnify the State for any costs for which the State may be found liable in this regard. 21, Parties' Pelationshin. If this contract is for the purpose of providing a loan.the parties Intend and agree that the relationship between them Is that of lender-borrower. Except with respect to its fiduciary obligations to the State set forth in Exhibit A, the Contractor shall not been deemed an employee or agent of the State. No agent or employee of Contractor shall be or shall be deemed to be an employee or agent of the State, other than for purposes of compliance with the fiduciary obligations to the State in Exhibit A. Contractor will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and the acts of its agents, employees and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. Page 5 of 7 Pages 890409 • sum.n.A(4.021t SPECIAL PROVISIONS CUNTItoz.LEIZ s. I'l'ROVAL 1. This contract shall not he deemed valid until n shall ha'a been approscj ny the Controller of the State of Colorado or such assistant as he may designate.This prosuron is applicable to any contract involving the payment of mane) by the State. FIND AVAILABILITY Financial obligations of the State payable sib r the current ticeal year art contingent upon funds tin that purpose being appropriated,budgeted and tithes rte made avail:ble. BOND REQUIREMENT 3. If contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction,erection.repair,maintenance,or improvement of any building road,bridge,viaduct.tunnel,excavation or other public works for this State,the contractor shall,before entering the performance of any such work included in this contract,duly execute and deli ser to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the State.a gad and suriclent bondorother acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one-half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract.Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified corporate surety,conditioned for the due and faithful performance of the contract,and in addition.shall provide that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail in duly pay for any labor,materials.team Mre,sustenance,provisions.pros endor or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in performance of the work contracted to be done,the surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the bond,together with interest at the rated eight per cent per annum,Unless such bond,when so required,is executed,delivered and filed,no claim in favor of the contractor arising under this contract shalt be audited,allowed or paid.A certified or cashier's check or a bank money order payable to the Treasurerof the State of Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond.This provision is in compliance with 38.26.106 CRS.as amended. XNDEMNIFICATION 4. To the extent authorized by law,the contractor shall indemnify,save and hold harmless the State,its employees and agents,against any and all claims, damages,liability and court awards including costs,expenses,and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor,or its employees. agents,subcontractors,or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract. DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957.as amended,and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices(24-34.402.CRS 1982 Replacement Vol.),and as required by Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirma- tive Action,dated April 16, 1973.Pursuant thereto, the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or subcontracts. During the performance of this contract,the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,creed.color,national origin,sex.marital status, religion.ancestry.mental or physical handicap,or age.The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during employment,without regard to the above mentioned characteristics.Such action shall include,but not be limited to the following:employment. upyadinb•demotion,or transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising:lay-offs or[emulations;rates of pay or other forms of compensation;and selection for ,mining including apprenticeship.The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places.available to employees and applicants for employment.notices to be pro- vided by the contracting officer setting forth provisions of this non-discrimination clause, (2) The contractor will,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by Cron behalf of the contractor.state that all qualified applicants will receive Crmsideration for employment without regard to race. creed.color,national origin,sex,marital status.religion.ancestry,mental or physical handicap,or age. (3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understand- thg.notice to be provided by the contracung officer,adsising the labor union or workers'representative of the contractor's commitment under the Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action-dated April 16. 1973.and of the rules,regulations,and relevant Orders of the Governor. (4) The rontrutor and labor unions will fumish all information and reports required by Executis e Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16. 1973.and by the rules.regulations and Orders of the Governor.or pursuant thereto,and will permit access to his books,records.and accounts by the contracting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules,regulations and orders. (5) Alabororganization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from All membership rights in such labor organization,or expel any such individual tram nentecship in su:h labor organization or discriminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportunity,because of race.creed,color. sex.;.ational origin.or zncesw. (Fr A labororganization,or the employees or members thereof will not aid,abet.incite.compel or coerce the doing of any act defined in this contract to be dis- criminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from complying with the pith isions of this contract or any order issued thereunder:or attempt either directly or indirectly.to commit any act defined in this contract to be discnminat-n, yc5 53.91.102? 'Revised i/SS page 6 a or pages t .ia4lJv xis 890409 • Form 6-AC.0:C (7i In the es en nl(hc contractor's nom compliance wish the nomdisanmmatien clauses of this contractor or with any of such rules.regulations.or orders.this contract may he cancelled,terminated or suspended in whole nr in part and the contractur may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in accordance with procedures.authortced in Executive Order,Equal Opportunity and Afflnmatls a Action of April 16,1975 and the rules,regulations.or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,and such other sanctions as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive Order.Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1973,or by rules,regulations,or orders promulgated in accordance therewith,or as otherwise provided by law, (8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph(I)through(K)in every sub-contract and subcontractor Purchase order unless exempted by rules. regulations.ororden Issuec pursuant as Executive Order.Equal Opportunity and A Ill nnatise Action of April 16,1975.so that such provisions will he binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.The contractor w iB take such action with respect to any subcontracting or purchase order as the contracting agents may direct,as a means of enforcing such provisions,including sanctions for non-compliance;provided,however,that in the event the contractor becomes involved in,or is threatened with,litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the contracting agency,the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado, COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE • 6a. Provisions of 8.17.101&102,CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract if public works within the State are undertaken hereun- der and ate financed in whole or in pan by State funds. b. When construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder,a resident bidder shall be allowed a preference against a non-resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or required by the state or foreign country in which the non-resident bidder is a resident.If it is deter- mined by the officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection.06 may cause denial of federal funds which would otherwise be mail- able or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law,this subsection shall be suspended,but only to the extent necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the inconsistency with federal requirements(section 8.29401 and 102, CRS). GENERAL 7, The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the interpretation,execution and enforcement of this contract Any provision of this contract whether or not incorporated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extrayudicial body or person or which is otherwise in conflict with said laws,Ma and regulations shall be considered null and void.Nothing contained in any provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or anyotha special provision in whole or in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint.defense or otherwise.My provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of this contract to the extent that the contract is capable of execution. 8. At all times during the performance of this Contract,the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws,rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established. 9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 184-301,et.seq„(Bribery and Corrupt Influences)and 18-8-401,et.seq..(Abuse of Public Office). CRS 1978 Replacement Vol.,and that no violation of such provisions is present. 10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest whatsoever in the service or property described herein: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first above written. Contractor. (Full Legal Name) lid 'lid County Board of Commissioners STAT COLORADO /E? t.fre' RO OD►IE , GOV C.. W-Kirhv I' irvegy 'rim gist-ill+,Z I EXCOPrt2 DIRECTOR Position(Tides Chairperson Sot]S.cvniy Number to Fong W.Number DEPARTMENT Local Affairs OF (If Corporate Atte:t(Seal) f%c (2 ._ CcZCaVaw.Santap,a Lwnalent,*eaoQn Comm..CRTs A R VALS ATTORNEY GENE WANE W/OO CON By_..-- AJ rs� By CLIFFORD -- Gw..c.t; �c3r 1 L'w::oa e 395.53Oi•1e)e iRtatd I,eal jr*hewnnww.an m �m meow tier :K t^••"e•a 89®4g9 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE, 890409 I EDC # 89-049 ExnielT A Colorado Economic Development Commission SCOPE OF SERVICES i. Scooe of Services The Project consists of conducting a study to determine the technical and economic feasibility of establishing a fish growing and processing operation in existing facilities owned by the Fort Lupton Canning Company in Fort Lupton, Colorado. The Contractor will be responsible for the administration of this Project. Contractor will enter into one or more subcontracts with qualified consultant(s), potential plant operators, and/or public agencies to perform this work, The Contractor will select subcontractors in accordance with applicable procurement procedures. Representatives of the Contractor and/or subcontractors will meet with representatives of the State Department of Agriculture prior to beginning work on this project,and at such other times as may be requested by the State to review work in process and findings of the project. Contractor will provide the State with written report(s) detailing the findings of the study and providing recommendations for future actions. The contribution from the Economic Development Fund under this Contract shall not exceed Fifteen Thqusgnd Dollars ($15.000.00). All project costs in excess of this amount will be the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor will provide at least$27.800,00 in in-kind and cash support for this Project. in the event that project costs are less than budgeted, costs shall be shared between the Contractor and the State on a pro-rata basis, and any unexpended funds shall be returned to the State. Copies of any and all subcontracts enters into by the Contractor to accomplish this Project will be submitted to the Department of Local Affairs, Financial Assistance Services section.upon execution. Any and all contracts entered into by the Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and Colorado state laws and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado notwithstanding provisions therein to the contrary. 2. Time of Performance The Project shall commence upon execution of this Contract. The Contract will expire on June 30 1990, except that the Contract may be extended a maximum of 6 months subject to the mutual agreement of the State and the Contractor. A request for extension by the Contractor shall be submitted to the State at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the Contract with a full justification for the extension request. If approved by the State,written notification will be provided to the offices of the State Controller and the State Attorney General. 3. Budget REVENVE eXPgNQIT!,1RES E.D.C. Funds $15,000 Travel, Equipment, Supplies, $10,300 Personnel Local Funds 27,800 Contractual Services 32,500 TOTAL: $42,800 TOTAL: $42,800 Exhibit A- EDC #89.049 Page 1 of 2 Pages 89©429 4. tgyrment Schedule 1, $7,500 Upon request for payment,following the initial meeting between Contractor and/or subcontractor representatives and the State referred into in Paragraph 1 of this Scope of Services. Ii. 6,000 Upon acceptance by the State of an Interim report detailing work accomplished and the results to-date of the feasibility study,and following an interim meeting with the State of contractor and/or subcontractor representatives If requested by the State, III. 1,500 Final payment to be made upon completion of the Project. The Contractor will submit a final financial report documenting the expenditure of all E.D.C. funds for which payment has been requested. The financial report and the report detailing the results of the feasibility study will be approved by the State before funds are released. $15,000 TOTAL Requests for payment will be initiated by the Contractor in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 6 of the main body of this contract. 5. Monitoring The Department of Local Affairs, Financial Assistance Services section, will monitor this Project on an as-needed basis. The Colorado Department of Agriculture will assist the Department of Local Affairs with project monitoring. 6. Reporting Schedule The Contractor will submit an interim financial and narrative report properly documenting all expenditures of E.D.C.funds and detailing work accomplished and results of the feasibility study Io- date at the time the interim payment Is request. The Contractor will submit a final financial status report properly documenting all expenditures of E.D.C. funds at the time the final payment is requested, in accordance with the payment schedule. Six(6) copies of the report describing the results and conclusions of the feasibility study will be provided to the Colorado Department of Agriculture, and one (1) copy shall be provided to the Department of Local Affairs. Page 2 of 2 Pages s 890409 EXHIBIT B 8904•C9 STATE OF COLORADO EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS 136 State Capitol Denver,Colorado 80203-1792 Phone(303) 866.2471 • C' QPYf Roy Romer Covemer May 12, 1989 Tim Schultz, Chairman Colorado Economic Development Commission 1313 Sherman Street, #518 Denver, CO 80203 Dear Tim: In accordance with CRS 24-45-105, I have authority' to review and approve recommendations by the Colorado Economic Development Commission for expenditures from the Economic Development Fund. I have reviewed the Fort Lupton Fish Growing and Processing agricultural feasibility study project, and hereby approve the expenditure of up to $15,000 from the Colorado Economic Development Fund for this project. Sincerel , T2 m Cara Governo S904(19 STATE OF COLORADO r DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS or OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 1313 Sherman Street, Rm.518 + Denver,Colorado 80203 + E7 • Phone(303}866.2771 Roy Romer Governor June 9, 1989 Timothy W.Schultz Executive Director C.W. Kirby, Chairperson Weld County Board of Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 RE: EDC #89.049/Ag - Ft. Lupton Fish Processing Dear Commissioner: Enclosed is your copy of a fully executed contract for the above referenced project. Please work with Evan Metcalf (866-4826) for continuing contract assistance. Thank you. Sincerely, Y^� • r _ Mindy R. Ge erz Financial Assistance Services Department of Local Affairs cc: Evan Metcalf 89(34 .9 en. Ag FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION RE: FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE FURROW CORPORATION, DBA CONVENIENCE PLUS NO. 250 , FOR 3 . 2% BEER RETAIL LICENSE The application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus No. 250, 4301 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501 , for a 3. 2% Beer Retail License, came on for hearing on the 24th day of April, 1989 , at 10:00 a.m. , and the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, having heard the testimony and evidence adduced upon said hearing, and having considered the testimony, evidence and remonstrances filed with said Board, and having carefully weighed the same, now makes the following findings! 1. The evidence discloses that the applicant has sustained the burden of proof as to the desires of the inhabitants. 2. That the applicant is of good character and reputation. 3. The applicant has proven the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood. p RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered the application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus No. 250 , 4301 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado 80501 , for a 3. 2% Beer Retail License, for the sale of fermented malt beverages, containing not more than 3. 2% of alcohol by weight, for consumption off the premises only, and WHEREAS, said applicant has paid to the County of Weld the sum of $450. 00 for the hearing fee, in addition to the other required fees, and WHEREAS, due to the Findings of the Board of County Commissioners in this matter, as stated herein, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application for a 3.2% Beer Retail License, for The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus No. 250. /,2 a Y 890371 Page 2 RE: 3. 2% BEER RETAIL LICENSE - CONVENIENCE PLUS NO. 250 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, having examined said application, the qualifications of the applicant, and the testimony of those present at the hearing, does hereby approve the application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus No. 250, for a 3.2% Beer Retail License, for the sale of fermented malt beverages , containing not more than 3.2% of alcohol by weight, for consumption off the premises only, for the reasons stated herein. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of April, A.D. , 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: �� ^ �`^r�� WELD ,COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County erk and Recorder r; and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Cha' rman a� �'.ne J son, Pro-Tem eputy Count"yLCler APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cane R. Brantner fi George n z V County Attorney // c, - 390371 C Et - ilia Off C oh . (ID P) D . D . rte t t aath off aa1a li 3 Liquor Enforcement Division 1375 Sherman Street .-. Denver, Colorado 80261 FURROW CORPORATION THE . CONV[ENGE PLUS N0250 r L1 6K4 523 T3N R68W LONGMONT CO 30501 p 1 ) Alcoholic Beverage License AeoouM Number us"es"Inau" Coin, CiN 4,6„t Y. ,ero IWi,iIN n.i.l LICENSE EXPIRES AT WNW L4-27115 ; 03 236 5411 3 050389 1 MAY 07. 1990 N ..Mwpwn 1.0.1.0. .m Oo M lwn.. I F.. J 3.C PCKLENI bkL,. KEIALL LICtNSc S C5.UU 1 1)) !), . LC•11 COUNTY 85 PERCENT OAP FEE S 42.50 TOTA4 FEE( Ib bl.7U ib This license is issued subject to the laws of the State of Colorado and especially under the provisions of Title 12. Articles 46 or 47, CRS 1973, as amended. This license is non- transferable and shall be conspicuously posted in the place above described. This license is only valid through the expiration date shown above. Questions concerning this license should be addressed to the Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Divison. 1375 Sherman Street.Denver,CO 80261. b.)) L, In testimony whereof.I have hereunto set my hand. l L r4.: U / 1� NAY 919 � 8g �. , Division Director Executive Director OR 0402 (348) DI 890371 _ , V 1 { L ■ -V•Ls/O ✓ 1. 1.. 1% J V L V I i 1... I% L 76 f.1. :kit. ,°`.i3, • � :'It.„-.0 't. v!i.�' „,4,.. !,k.`.,,..r.� 'Ji, ,...� , �ii j:::.1/4:!e:, �'. ; , �T � o5 i,.,f, . . �� l? y �� $F j , cz, ..w:e4 MA{l.0,..C 'vr ,r.,♦5> , . .y`', r:.. ` `.r Ur. 'v -x yr '•.a.• Y,� ".a - n i,i H x' rr r .. Jrr �,♦��x r/ccj-: K J � /r1,‘,.•' c',.; � r rr' � is ♦ � -`..T r ,.J, V♦ � ' ,,•Lr �♦\ G �U..A.,,., �� .4 r >Pi ti, ->i'Ur f4 'r* ✓'i.. �G d VSv\.'vr �' •.. t .hr h �. . 7�:. r ... � i ,u.t. .�- r \ irj ,�..� J i .�� ♦ '�.' r am. -• J .. .e'` r �♦�.-a rC�� ',,4. �S. 53i 'ili 1/4‘$X ; : f r !s .� d.a. ,t f0t vi. , Q4,L ,y. —„.re J anew ,, °' ;To ry=e , .? K1 s \\\\\ r�l 3, ♦ s-d '� ••.•=4-T-4;410;.•�a�: r � ♦c�sa .;•.� �r, � r.s, �Q'..c°�T @ r�W die ..� ass e£c. ��,z ."" 1 el �j1/frr 3 ✓ �' u 'A, ,e.+�. ® . r r,,,\ —_ „4,-..4.,-,7%— d a yr c ', lr — /. a,• s \ �1 �, .. - rl EN9[� r _ u4 't&'/d `► ` ♦It +. 7 lilts_ is c _ ,�` STATE OP i ' . COLOADO ! {F.€ .�` 1 af- r r. ''��., i� ei \;,•: • ' r', ' COUNTY OF WELD 1 ��f��'-tom ' .tilt Yom; �� BY AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS � ,1 Fermented Malt Beverage License I k �r ~7tt�yam• _.. � , �` ¢ <t�fU' ry RETAIL K x ! alga 16 to TCC11flf, That THE FURROW CORI'ORAT14�...P6A..CSlHX]:TixEHGE_Pl!!$..A'f?...2SA. .__.._.._. _. _. _. _. _. >4.1r Y�' ail 3'i rr ; 1411- , \ ----„trzr-♦, of the State of Colorado,having applied for License to sell FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGES at retail and having F. ' K' paid to the Treasurer of Weld County, the sum of SEVEN AND 50/100 -" �F. Dollars therefor, the above applicant % .,r` , Q l is hereby licensed to sell FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGES containing not more than 3.2%of Alcohol by weight atr} X; . ti -S• 4301 HIGHWAY 66t LONGMONTa COLORADO 80501 �.•,.,-� i" :`; _� a:,: * 8TH MAY 89 %` 4: in the County of Weld, Colorado, for one year from the day of , 19 , , efr, -. i. IS-4 to the 7TH day of MAY 19 90 , unless this License be sooner revoked %;-::..:. "' � '' -,4 ; r -'a., as provided by law. , ra' .'x. 4..♦-4, ] 4?jrr �. S1-itaS s`.� a�.#/ Q i >--, . y- Yea This License is issued subject to the Laws of the State of Colorado, and especially under the pro- , �., ,�. ¶ , u <` >& ��;;,visions of Article 46 of Title 12, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended. r >Y y '.. '71 H s`�• �'. faaa era 'r s%/ M I -u a 'a ', .rsat a -ay 1 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners has hereunto subscribed its n ar + w rr ��fy�� 'na1� by its officers Iuiy authorized, this 26TH day of APRIL ,19 89 i y . y t:jam- / 'i't4�R Waarsa. a ! .� v > .,„% .1. , A1`a4 ♦ . . !Y `.4. .:4 s. . :. a Fes '{ �.' vraN f1:>'/hYF�'°'.r ®Jirr �v"}wg aa' .,.^ ' 17, '.' .i sy♦� �i _ • . %� a s$ydk,g a > r,ti epn �IIIffi1B.WOIIe x1,17.---Co..:, ,.7 vs -ty'a.-. i 'ariravy :,. sa . - `tiaeaxa a-s.nra ,rsaa ,s } . si9:lm L.6J'yy�y`uS4ta-.a. s mm:k:: Y�' ,` ._. .a a j 1 `�a Or It, -:s1• .aa"S":> t lFar '6�yy�ri"Cs'Y Y�Yss'.. • •.a5�4 fi-..• •s a `as ar .: '.. s3 'x -a sa 'a -+T'aa r-3 � --,,,-,A,,,,„----- �,{ 'YH/= ~-r �aai s ,.< A;.� y Y t�^�Ar}'rs tie , aw>ii � �` ayaw ,.r ratty sS� �. .y.ai` "` H .. a; ..Z +`, _sia"y ..� __ y _ ,-- ¢ "r 'SlIA Qv a y� - <.-t+ Pft ` 06rcrof r ritk_ettringsslo �y— .• yPeer! ,- "a ! `VsJ'�C+- : 3/\ r - M C /\ 1 -:- ,- I. j4 �.L' t'fi . k£ _®.j the `q `' �I� s �.C � sir. ♦ '�Yir ♦w'�� e-�x.e ��$ ♦ •� i _ _ ♦ �.- s � 4A �'� �� -,--b- r � � �t y . �+ r•a - 'a.1 , i y .y .4$ a j.;, '2-4&‘. a sr 1 ki s. ':I .- C 4- ay f, ,"4"-W1:v Z,` i :�, rr G1-; t r _ t "1` - t J .tiv 151. s H F v .�, � :Ira' 3�t' - i f tv rt.- .,,,,,, —4!.., �� r� � '�`Cy .. 4,..-'!e. i , t^ a - ,,::c?. i� .� fk .��'. P/F'• / `Jar.. a*aa' . ��,�h�I '?i �.�.� �� ,,\,.r1J� �.,e ,�+�i /,�...� ^� ,r .�S j5� .. a ti.ETC." _ i:�`TJ'i r��, ."+.♦..tr r" •j _:�.� � ._ ?>,, a•.4/d.tr z::.�,. _' rrii.. ..,�,,, ,,....„----0:.„--,,,,,.-0 r`,�N.`�.,�b,.rrr .,,�"-- re..- 1 �/ .rC�•y„y.^. dFrr:r,�\,,„ arse ,,.�\��.M. .ey.✓ �r,ri/:. :�:: , 0 --•/ -..w•~• �r'k �•.•a.~ .r�`•r'"I x.,r,.. � r rr /r• 'c� '.`.s t+,. .`ar�v�rtrrt"Sr .,.4. r ``.k. r ::�` 'rr r \' 0 :. \ r r' fi ...,..-E...a•.„ r: ��4-..rte \_,_ � kc _\s �-3 . ..: rrS :::4 err ,a' ..g_ -,:>•(:„ >•(:„ •.� � 7 `r-Lr �' ...;;; l -:. sn -•:kw.3-..,..Sira } -1/2‘;`yam . - ' poi \�. r r. • iw_.,�� ...�,�., : .� _1: � �s� � ,� +�. z'v '`ij.�'♦ TO BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE Ttfe T Trnnycr rvnrnro MAY 7 a Gfl 1\7n1\t •t'ii A1♦rncrn An, I I I ■ TREASURER'S OFFICE,WELD COUNTY /_ N2 4128 J y// Greeley,Colorado. ¶t'22 . 14' , 19/.9./. ... / RECEIVED OFi) arfd!/�iL It ' • � '(� }/ . . . . . . $ 'Y� /, ' ,! i. h10t4).eteP. . r'!F tt l .( ti ta•C LLtne , !. biA.000/1/0..e. FOR CREDIT �j ,/ ounty General Fund 101 0000 „As'fin ,j,,�,,/,, „ _ .rifle— , s , _-L..•,— _ ,,. ,. ' I3908B d //7n i,( F Ill i I 2/61) O0 O Human Resources 121 000 Social Services 112 0000 Housing Authority Road& Bridge Fund 111 0000 Airport 1770000 I I I County Clerk Cash Escrow 810 0803 I Fee Fund 900 0912 School District Gen Fund School District C R F pQ 'I I School District Bond Fund 89037% FRANCIS M. LOUSTALET I TOTAL AMOUNT Ceunty Treasurer Clerk 46-7 5 II ,z S.w • t. ';Ni; .' Y ATTENDANCE RECORD PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name o£ the applicant or Docket # for the hearing you are attending. TODAY'S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: APRIL 26, 1989 DOCKET # 89-16L 3.2Z BEER LICENSE-THE FURROW CORPORATION, DBA CONVENIENCE PLUS DOCKET 4 89-18 USR-OPEN-CUT MINING OPERATION, MATERIALS PROCESSING, AND ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANT - PHILLIP CAMENISCH DOCKET NAME ADDRESS HEAP ATTENDING // , ' // f//�i'V A4 16ivmdm4,f � k% 9,41,,td6f3 . pi-J.4_, 314. , ,+e 42S u.0 iRn/ S4,f c. p 111,7 /y„d itti A ut(v. l d1p , ��.. . �,� • !/Sr/ �,) P /Zi3 U , ,;L . �`9,t<4.Rec) �� .r+ :� • S" /x„_ ,'1.� 1 d Sc, Y k' c i? "" _7" US/c?FXs/ P --,a �- 4 t\r �kv & � r_F:1. t 1 &wke.4.l•sc,L L �..` C v fl, le AMP 1I.k, 7n.7,• Pin e' r-2._ eee.vr...� Ise-4, !c (�,. t/77. le." ) , 7 ;/b _OroLleie /n 1.5 9 b, r /1/. 44:. X14.5'0/ vootn d r-/ c- /1613 0-1,/' Pei 7/ r Cp 452/ iff ti,/6 Grecto itortr ae 5 • bept c,t1 o Greeleyy• Tank Ste. trews 1tQF) In'�` 5M- arov v.. `61C% 31 A.ot? c,te Aenhettc Kd-�-A' /yeti ta-, w //33',,x,—W. C // Jbrj�•c/�/- .,,,,z7 C'a' ��'c 4r e /..L'2V' Lil/ lgp . 1 `FJ ( W. 1✓, U1 ,-. Uxo'>n•,,�0{? 1 -�/lissC✓— c,4, /5lsv�CS-O l3 At., .(ore ca� 14/1,• 41-19,4C'-p - .�e so ca A. 1 01$2:0Pf 2130 Alit htek \haal At, £O e yeiv , L k(/ el,./.. �G�I'7TG,,,A //Or )7 &Z/.L41c ≥ nC P1. L./71.71j�lIGX/ (CI"rkY Y• ..!'`^ \Y1D ti se. Il i EY 1 L(-li,S1]`6YC( `C-Alc`, (C1 t1 1 x(11\of r�3c L ,• / , I`i.InickLsdt,_ W),46'� .,.. Dite:47tL,:.e. tic,,-q . 1:•,,,...it.i.nc l e Chu_ck" .4- DA+ LARSsry !07oc, cz). e.2..7 C'B'''n.A.A4 rl 590371 /4{ /-i/rrGW " fl. POLICY MANUAL 5-01 Section 5: Controls • Effective: May 18, 1987 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES 1. All government laws and regulations which pertain to the sale of alcoholic beverages will be followed without exception. 2. Violation of these regulations or the allowing of such violations to occur will not be tolerated. 3. Store Supervisors, Store Managers, and employees must be aware of the alcoholic beverage laws in the state, county and city where our stores operate, and are charged with the responsibility of insuring our compliance with such laws. 4. Selling alcoholic beverages to anyone under the legal age is prohibited and will not be tolerated. 5. Do not allow consumption of alcoholic beverages on company premises. 6. Sales personnel must require I . D. which positively produces evidence of age if age is questionable. 7. Alcoholic beverages will not be sold if I . D. is questionable. 8 Store Managers are responsible for displaying signs and licenses pertaining to alcoholic beverage sales as required by law. 9. Sales personnel are not allowed to sell alcoholic beverages to visibly intoxicated or disorderly customers. • A-1 EXHIBIT 890371 a YENTA INC. 6-01 • OPERATING PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL Section 4: Controls Effective: June 18, 1987 Alcoholic Beverage Sales yO 1 . All customers who do not appear to be-??years old or older will be checked for proper 1 .0. prior to their purchase of alcoholic beverages. 2. Regular store meetings must be held and documented to discuss the sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the Store Managers responsibility to schedule and conduct these meetings. 3. The industry's "I I .D." program will be supported by the wearing of buttons and display of signage. 4. Military 1 .D., Drivers License, or State issued I .D. with picture are the only item of acceptable I:O. • 890371. J YENTA INC. POLICY MANUAL 5-02 • 5ectlon 5: Controls Effective: May 18, 1987 • PROOF OF AGE State of Colorado Liquor Enforcement Division PROOF OF ACE - Retailers Must Check Drinkers' Ares Carefully Determination of a young person's age Is undoubtedly one of the most difficult functions that a licensee or his employees are called upon to perform and usually this is more difficult in the case of young women than in the can of young men. Physical appearance is. of count, your initial impression of the persons' age and while most people look their age; then are, nevertheless, many exceptions. An experienced bartender or waitress will sort out the people of questionable age with little difficulty and will ask them for documents to establish their age. Sometimes a person an be taken off guard and induced to disclose his or her correct age by such a question as. "When were you eighteen?" Most people carry documents of identification on their person. some which set forth their age. • Licensees may refuse to sell fermented malt beverages to any person unable to produce adequate identification of age. The had and type of identification deemed adequate by law shall be limited to the following: 1. Colorado Operator's License. 2. Colorado Provisional Operator's License. 3. Colorado Chauffeur's License. 4. Identification Card issued in accordance with CRS '63, 13261. S. An operator's, chauffeur's or similar type of driver's license, containing a picture, issued by another state. 6. Identification card containing a picture issued by another state for the purpose of proof of age. 7. Military identification cards. 8. Valid passport. 9. Alien registration card. Since the driver's license has the photograph of the person licensed and the birt dace, it is one of our best means of identification. Ensures can be easily detected, but sometimes the figures in the bu•thdace are cut out with a razor or punch and others pasted in. This can be detected by bolding it up to a light or shining a flashlight through it from behind. Also there may be cases where the person has falsified his age when obtaining the license. There are many altered cards and convincing imitadoas in circulation, so if a person looks young refuse him or her service =less proof of age is established beyond question• When an altered driver's license or other identification is presented to you. or identi- fication other than that of the person presenting it. call a police officer or liquor enforcement officer as the mere attempt to purchase alcoholic liquors with false identification is a violation of the law. • 890371 _ J YENTA INC. (5Ø3"S``2 7171 1055 WAZEE ST.. SUITE 10n DENVER. COLORADO so2n4 I have attended the meeting on the sale of alcohol to the public. In this meeting I have been instructed on Venta policy and state laws pertaining to the sales of alcohol in my store• I have also viewed the film titled " Techniques Of Alcohol Management " . I fully understand the laws and policies surrounding the sales of alcohol . I will follow the laws and policies to the letter. I further understand that any violation of these laws and policies will be cause for my immediate dis- missal from the company. signed: date: 890371 II ExN)g)t� PETITION A AVIII t 047 5% t' We , the undersigned patrons of Convenience Plus a 01 Highway 66, Longmont, Colorado, hereby state that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for fermented malt beverages are not now adequately served by existing outlets, and we request that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County issue a license to The Furrow Corporation to sell fermented malt beverages at Convenience Plus. Date Name Address 311-4° g/tfr/✓6,,L, y32z_ /,270GG 7C}�a2 1 A-1 /5 t ft-ci cv,C�,i _1?-'�'�'�'r .,,.. ._ev / 7/ A her i -e l ,its /l _ tt 7!fS5wcr.,# I5 f o s ...,. / pf -7Ii/i�-x� tic 1j97c lc)CJ' /,fir /fn9"'°/�$ A' ./. /-7 —a,-4u.., g Sky L1A0. u/.i C ` *,y.-l az!/c_- R2 ,70 41-e-11/4 ./ 5-24_,___ . — 9/iC Jn .. 9 ..-4 �// J 4471-11--C-) �/ ,/9 ' 11 I. ? S'# \1. L� L l�ma-Inrt es) . )4-121 -4, - 66- ' /rte rn�.Y. `�4.-6� 0-1- r.cCl-_ Wee/ ' 41//u fit,h. if-Lran' 47'1/-S9 A aI P t S 14'Q,A# b Lo )) 1 o(y�+(/� . fo J co /.c Esti, )u1-ec C1-, /1--r, OL i 7 1 .t_ ..I/ L.1, `i`ttii'i�- d& (a. , r� 4-10-.. 4-'2i 70 3 / ,EI....-y t& -ea.?,,,.. `^�if-.c, ,�5,s ,e/JO./- 7. h / 9t<_4?.- E'•/T ,e1,22r , - 8' / _/// /961- tAir R / Tti1,h s:mdk, . /71-0 S 7 en n,cic .Je /0".1 rkezn/� Ca _/.C/ H3zt N/ 4t‘ 4,-,24 j 1 1I94-, 4,JCie 4 II' ,/1, r c & Co f,ofF .e 6a/0;., /720 S L M4AI #/F r to -,,--✓ (' Jl�/!�(%t v 2299 cv,_ -Ss ',1->--Cl 1--n fin 96i- /e..(� /zr7, ,— ,., -s cid•' �. �' J 1✓�"P 141S H,,,, 1‘ 1-019f, ()t. 3cCce At 'nnct \\,.\\\nmn 41, toaHK \\C\ x'22-- a` c,rti - '" 890371 PETITION We , the undersigned adult inhabitants of the following described neighborhood: All of Sections 13 , 14 , 15, 16 , 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 , 27 , 28 , 33 , 34 , 35 and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 west of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado hereby state that the reasonable requirements of said neighborhood for fermented malt beverages are not now adequately served by existing outlets, and we request that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County issue a license to sell fermented malt beverages to The Furrow Corporation. Date Name Address y A/ic/r5 91^ ' J`, , A37/.7244 Awl v . / f1 j . 4- /o - ii ./ en. //1./.,1 370/ 1-7e opAy (Jr L o fraJ ,/ /<< cl;+ rS"U�� / / L.'- :/r./-/ r-7 M41,- 2.. r..,'L•/.? /1 1sn,;✓. i -x/ Cam. ~/ - /G �Lca� v(� lr/CL• /53SUitii i1gJ sI A, lent-x. ( v, /6.'i//C� P7 //��i%/e �/1 i /0,4'7 , . n ///,,,,. ify, {-/D -R? teis 4 �� 6769 & kg .. . �ph9�// sy � ,~� 1,37G/ff, ��,4_//- 7? 434tH/-/6 . rei Co I/ - l9 - CI . 44, UQ4'"'-. .\ /0 at/y d4--(..6 Ve ,-e , - / 3 -.31-y• / - \ ( u.2 , &, &0/h,�3,cci N cf-• / .5 7 Ed/ 4,1,_./ rri /%2 7 % 4,-) C IC /7 41 --(21/- g 9 , aavtif dabitsaa: IL2442, 7 Le/V. /4 14W, i EXHIBIT -4 tW 9963'71 • PETITION We , the undersigned adult inhabitants of the following described neighborhood: All of Sections 13, 14, 15 , 16 , 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 , 27, 28 , 33, 34, 35 and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado hereby state that the reasonable requirements of said neighborhood for fermented malt beverages are not now adequately served by existing outlets, and we request that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County issue a license to sell fermented malt beverages to The Furrow Corporation. Date Name Address Zi/4.O9 I e/7/ ,ti/ay � _ V.:78 ♦:f/firy Cvet �/� t � • ` VATS 9 Xkii4 ,, !P 4017 ,P6. g 9/2 5/8 / „i /7 A A . ,% /II .O.I404 /XS.2 1 ,./ <1.2— ,.,- 4/..m-- Y 914x, e rte • yA;7/ 9 A 3 `� 4/3� 1 7 . p /,r /416711 OW WI? ,.�/il7 7 7; -1.,32,x? ✓�i 2 • t; 7 e.6 /-4- • EXHIBIT S 7 890371 777277` LETTER OF PROT , 26 All 9 27 • CLERK To: Local Licensing Authority TO iHEEO% ;D From: John 0. Collins Date: 4/18/89 Subject: Furrow Corporation dba Convenience Plus In reference to the application made by Furrow Corporation dba Convenience Plus; Conrad Hopp president, I hereby wish to lodge a formal remonstration against granting the above mentioned company a license by this board. The reason for this remonstration is; 1) On 3/27/89 the above mentioned company by order of the president Conrad Hopp, refused service by the Weld County Sheriff' s Office on orders from a Court of the United States. Document provided a. In accordance with sec. 12-46-105 of the Colorado Revised Statues it is the duty of the State Licensing Authority to enforce "compliance with enforcement cr violation of any law, rule or reaulation. . . and such activit es as become, necessary. " Additionally, sec. 12-46-116 states it is the duties of Inspectors and Police Officers; 1) . . .issue summons 2) It is the duty of all sheriffs and police officers to enforce the provisions of this article. . . To grant a licensing of this applicant under sec. 12- 46-105 and sec. 12-46-116 would constitute a violation of the law. I believe it is in the best interest of this board and the community to postpone such licensing until the above mentioned applicant surrenders to service by the District Court of the United States. In no way is it appropriate for a granting of a license to such an applicant, when the said applicant is pending default by a District Court of the United States . • I further ask under sec. 12-47-111 of the C.R.S. a complete listing of all partners, officers and associates who hold interest in the above mentioned Co. to include any associations who may hold indirect interest in the property of the said Co. whether leased or owned. Pending this disclosure and surrender to service I ask for a 120 day period for review of the said documents before such a license is granted. 9,/J /, john 0. Collins Eret 590371 ,STATE OF COLORADO ! • • ISS. CERTIFICATE OR AFFIDAVIT OF NOW SERVICE COUNTY OF MELD I DOCUMENT NUMBER: 89 087 iJ2930 DOCKETT NUMBER: 82CV00130 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM OVER THE AGE OF ID YEARS AND NOT A PARTY TO THIS ACTION, AND THAT THE DEFENDANT C-PLUS CONVENIENCE STORE NAMED IN THE WITHIN WRIT OF GARNISHMENT AFTLR DILIGENT SEARCH AND INQUIRY, CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE COUNTY OF MELD, COLORADO, AND RETURN Is MADE THIS THIRTY-FIRST DAY OF MARCH , 1989. REMARKS: REFUSED SERV PER ATTORNY ATTEMPTS: ED JORDAN :,HER IFF SERVICE $5.00 MILEAGE 50.00 TIME $0.00 TOTAL *5.00 AMOUNT BILLED $5.00 MARY SCHMART2 t ee2SiS DEPUTY SuascRXNLD AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 044 OF , 19 _ 5OTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : 890371 nictYrirt 0 RT Weld C . COLORADO CASE NO. -Q2 CV 1. 0 My/CI.Rm, Cpl — 1 WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT PLmnn(at John Oliver Collins va, Oetenoenl(s) Ronald Michael Sekich d.b.a. SeCo Safe Company • Ju0gmenl Captors name,Inl known leorn.,Oliver lOMulytng informetwn Ronald Michael Sekich 6500 WCR #32 Longmont. Colo. 80501 Soc. s, Sec. # 523-15-3184 Date of Birth 4/1x/41 1.O/Igoet Amount o1 Judgment Entered 1/7/v3 6.683.16 Klan 2. Plus any Intern! Due on Judgment ( %Gal annulnl •f 5.979.23 3. Taaaore Cal, (mcluding 'stun ela0 Cat 01 awwCe 01 the well, •S 127_01 - a.Less any Amount Paid .S 17'+ 1Q 5,Princical Belanes/TOfal AmOunl Owe and Owmg ,f 12.616.10 I alfrm inn l amaulfOnceotOect lot the Amoment scan RAE leaf ms genus and COMMCOn sla Mtn 1 2 24/89 /f�f,/t.sC./oMo Su�acnbed unity Oath Debate me onMAR 231989 ((( ! br.w,.wr..wnwr IM a,./..,ww pAnl�.l John Oliver Collins 17061 WCR #5 Platteville, Colo. 806,51 My Commission EFo"es: (303) 772-4353 WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO 10 the Shndl of ally Colorado Courtly:or to any weer person ovwlne edeol Ie yews wed n rot a any 10 1hel lemon. You ate duetted To sera Two Cowes of Inn wnl at eammumq Cavnnnmem voon C-Plus Conveince Store 4301 Hwv 66 Longmont, Colo. 80501 .1er"grtee.yam HOW return Ol swacelOOemaoelO mecoun TO THE GARNISHEE - YOU ARC HEREBY SUMMONEO AS CARNISNEE IN THIS ACTION AND ORDERED a. To answer l he lolldwmg Gun ton,under Olin Ina tohleyour amwen w.ln tee Cleft of the cowl no less than 5 Ade more 100aysrorlow.nq - �l,J „ ' me Wile YOu oev lnw lvogemnl debtor toe lee fay nate tollownq seenCeolmgNYn ofConur.u...q OMnlnmMf,GroOOay'follown.o,n. vl0e of true wrd upon you.wmenevw n lea,..YOUR FAILURE TO ANSWER THIS WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT WILL RESULT IN THE ENTRY OF A DEFAULT AGAINST YOU. b, To Day any nonesemol euning,to the clerk of mbaQun no lm man 5nor mom men SO days Id Caenmme •h. „ ' oe0wr femoloyeel Owned the elloth.e 0erloc Of this went and all( n af Thep ECYGn melends • c_ ge COCODy OI the GICYlauon OIlea AmdrmorEravnOf EJtmngs used — (the CalCulamOn unOM-OueSIIOns l0 Ot Anawere0 Oy Galmsl.ee'snould be vied TOY inc heal Day Pend.and One of In.mutual, CalculMwn Ions mcW0e0 w.m inn writ should be used for all,VOaeduent ay OeH.00SL — C. Todeliver acooyof MosWMof ConnmmngGerrnanmenUognner wan neCalculabOnOt IneA.Oumof Cannot Esm.ngs.at me brit lime you Oay the lu0gment debt&I lemoIOvrf. d. TO[Penwell a copy Of!ace suoseoutel Calcyuoen of few Amount of Eeemor Earenno,nen ninny*ay lneruogmeve Orme fM.oloyee) tot Inc temarnoev of me effective cried. a, MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE ANO MAIL TOTHE CLERK Of THED ntrio .COURT AT P.O. Box C _ PLEASE PUT THE CASE NUMBER(mown atwvet ON THE CHECK. (��C—fin Greeley ,cp. t5V411Z CLERK OF THE COURT Sr A .DA((1�K ? '`\A—AN—vh oat..i.. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) DATE: __Sri 97, 1QR4 - CF301 uPDAYE LEGAL FORM! e 0 eoa urn•wsgtt COsa.00 aeu: — IJW1 w6ey1 590371 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK DD FM LEAVE BLANK LAST NAM FIRST NAM! SADDLE IE•YE APPL`�CANT ''I''2 a P /-f O n/n ✓�7U r 114 7(2n 4MAt IO PEAS IIMcERPPMTrR ALIASES AKA/ 0 (VUbdUUUU ��r� i,/ R SO 890734651206 ✓ lQ- t"�(I'/f, %'' . . � GREELEY CO A,E Y.Enos. D�A^J� REN4f,CRoe PEN Sax riNLEYBYII.•FU D pi. � •,Y`' / ` UTILExn'P CT? sE. ArE xn. AYES PA•v LALE OF e,EI*x !T DAYS il "'Anna xf UEOEEILIAL r•EIYIVINL.Exv AIMYS TULIN xo. OCA LEAVE BLANKr CI C��//1S .. r 5 EMPLOY EN MID ADDRESS V FBI NO- FBI CLASS ARMED FORCES NO M - .� REP. '.�n _i REASON Y'.xvE4vNlx• M1 MIICEL ANECI S NO SAC ,. Sam o '-c /�R • wI SCE'IAx EDDl xD. 111I1B J I A Ali- +r, ' E / •.thumb•• ] N. ".M EI x J. .nOole E N v. ML" I s. R.LnRE •v + � F Y W^IEf': A t Sj Y ra r•ii �M �r " . I L.wIOOL! s.I.,RISC 10, L.LITTLE • • : • i I LNA ` A�1(2',..r • . r � Ma r t•\\i\4 • y • t 890371 .MN+AIM')T nGT mull AMMO TANRrI vAw,LTAx! V.Ca / ......,...E..L Mill slMUL uxeouLLr I t uM. __,_.n5,TII!'xP- Ill 1-17a(Rev 1.18.87) - U.S. Department of Justice J • Federal Bureau of Investigation • V, i ("1R 3 I r.q''a's Nhshington, D.C. 20537-9700 The finger impressions which have the number in individual finger blocks circled on the attached cards are not susceptible of accurate classification because of one or more of the various reasons listed below. Each fingerprint card Indicates by number or nota- tion on the back of the fingerprint card the particular reason or reasons for its return. (1) Ink was unevenly distributed (8) One or more fingers printed twice (2) Fingers not fully Inked or rolled (9) One or more impressions missing or partially missing. (3) Too much ink Please Indicate if there is an amputation. If no amputa- te) Insufficient ink none,obtain thesefirgerprints, In cases of bent Of (5) Some impressions smudged,possibly fingers slipped paralyzed fingers,it Is suggested that a spoon or similar while being rolled,or fingers not clean and dry instrument be used end the fingers be printed individually (B) Rldgecharacterlstics not distinct,possibly due to the (10) Fingerprints not in sequence in spaces Indicated nature of the Individual's employment or some other (11) Impressions not black on standard white fingerprint care cause. Legible prints may be obtained atter a few days stock (7) Hands have been reversed (12) Fingerprint ink not permanent. Oue to the volume of fingerprints contained In the fingerprint files of the FBI,and the use of super breakups and extensions in conjunction with the Henry Classification System,it is necessary to obtain exact ridge counts and tracings of all ten fingers in order to search our files property. In the event of serious injury to afinger precluding the taking of prints of the finger at this time,it is suggested that printing be done et a later date when a complete setof prints may be secured, It is suggested that reprints be obtained and forwarded to the FBI for appropriate action. When submitting the reprints it is not necessary to return the original fingerprint card,as only one copy of each set of fingerprints is necessary for retention in this Bureau's tiles. For your information,a check byname only has been made on the enclosed prints with negative results. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. IdsntIfcetlon Division FBI Note: Illegible fingerprint cards submitted In connection with licensing or employment for which you are paying a fee must be returned with your resubmission of prints In order to receive credit tor your original payment. Please Note Instructions on Reverse Side. Sa ?!3'71 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK FBI LEAVE BLANK APPI CANT ^ LA W NAM LEST MINE woOLE NUE P/ °If / ' the "AI. 514MA. InvpEWS NNDERIEIRI7 / L1A,E5 AKA,/ o COUbdUCUU 70. -x 4,-/ , , , A x i sO 890734651206 REGDENLv:]..Ekl.x..x4x..;,y;E, ' , GREFLEY CO DATE DEy,N,x DOB / \ D.x • v. Si 1• CI [E SMiV CT7 SIA .r' x4.. fE7 i I ALT. refs HAIR LACE OE n PQB 4 4xATur,.t OE Cff� 1'�/'.ALIANI AGENIMIN15 .uux xo AI IJ� CQ CA-"F..‘,20- A. r j . OCA LEAVE BLANK' ! ExvL0.Ew AND ADOwEss S KO ND, nil )r CAS o. . 41 1_SINED F0NLES ND. ',Oyu NEAWN E'.xyF yvyix• REF - 1�SDc AL 5Ecux Tv No. SOC (�jfedi say -� '3C? 4 A. MISCELLANE0JS NO MNU y` `. LrA1A Q^cit.-it. {'anAiwn' w 1..; ILL [yy — - I, R TMJNtl 1 R,'NDEL ]. R.MIDDLE A ,N RING 3 I CHYLE • Lk 1' A�11 "4.:,/,�; s ,..+..r�.F`r L W�lu� M1` e.y 9� r 'A. I. MMUNO ), 1. INDEX a L-m1D0LE v,I. RING 10, L LITTLE AfRs.A 4. 4 L .N-,, L l�,a' 1II D1"! 4 i M+ .�. „c °,✓Ai Sri Ø V11��i �, " 8903' 1 ' r ,‘• 5* :; FIddreWLEFT FOLIO FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY ,TALV4 x 1111VYe TlU46. EIGNT IWE PINCERS TAKEN LYULTAY[OVtVF• •A I FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537 LOOP APPLICANT \I / AA `F L ' TOOK A Y LASS AIAH I F N:CkA N $ 1� A AA - J IH CE IN V YLY ON La6. I\ ‘‘\ --‘.'.. - 1 14 AND )YY t A,THG 0J0O HL 1V 0 FI _(li UYNAIL /OW4 1. AN)All ) n 0%Ni N :kl Tn ,!,,I ,rrf ut'Wf ;PIP APE u!CONOFD Nrn t ^r+ .. _ r f -- A '.fl 4 !4D v DUAL FINGYt1 ')CY I ✓. s _.-_-1.Z! ' ,.L tLLT TWA LAN if 4 tr i w'H a Yam° Arl IJ 1 'HI Cq ) t, LAiN'N. Af uil!_ I !:JN',T AN C:F5. "— .-- APkPki HE `IF[nl 0 .LI .I CAN 1t A ,L Pit AN kr N malD HAT 1 1Y , I N IN C LN 'It (}E rl ♦I ry aAU. l`1 r Y r) 'NC vnT I Inc.. n•o G HATT + '.D-CU; III .1N^; )1C.4 ML$T ,NOW NI 1.i. I.kr_1 AND A ' N, ,HOWN ML'I(. ..-....._ 1 N) U L ".---_. __ .. '( SAK ) Ge L F ;1Y_ :F 4i ,C1i '_ :C:. u'!;!S-..._F l I iti 111lC C.'"4\ r IA A N( ; F F 'r lY a F ry l .ho / i 1 C,r9 / jam- � � Ni-% l . N I .Y T IU"T.oti MO RECORD_____ 1111 1 1 ; i ' 'Hc,r Aril 4 + IC Lu. AI NA, lOHAS •B• • I r. .r� f EAL r r 1 a RIwcHECK ONLY `n I� 1/##--".1- 4 v '-'t / % "A'''‘.„‘e 4A Ca LC AL ACt"Nrir4 A404PA V GALS 2il rte/ ,. "�v A V Nf. L AL :LCJH Y AL MBE F' N 'Cr f y, ��4 tlE AY A Av y r e Aar A ',✓/�j �� !. AV HOP', Y F'' S1. L ATI 4 ) Ir' M , 1 A - 'f _ 1 PVVAiE TF.'/( IIUI_J -+ 1‘: _ i 1 ...PA,I 1 mP,l1 AND ALP-pp. CUNT It i' /V I ( � Vr AAMI CF )IIt A HCV 5_BO Y F Al. N..T 5 :ii pp ,�N1 y71 1'wY,TH'E 11 II 1 ,1 (� ,l� b8 I.V• A rI r N '.NLV A1,,t+ F: '4 C - LPN Jt--.A ...%.. r. IN-PE AM •1�'�!1 'P AO- . Jitti, W.j 1 %,,r pY .II_, PYC0 0: OTHEN AFM12 FOaCF^NO.. I/'l ♦ ,�t1�I'`�^''P ALIT RFG'''IkATIC NC's,LNG `iefer9r-.aR i .7I AHCHCS HAVE NO DELTAS A ��"'�O -prf9 ''1 1F ( TIVr ',FR,/CI.LYCY.SQ GCI3k0ay oJQ� ANC 77.. INRiFATIG4 C A Y NO VA PF' '1 l)': ,I V.6. I.0 NNMt N FF NTINC. W rI, , I'An •,. . -I -.J P -^m0 d 2 -? MAR 141989 0 890371 1-17a(Rev,1.1647) . - U.S. Department of Justice ••` • Federal Bureau of Investigation "AR 3 I r892, Wishingtort,D.C. 20537.9700 The finger Impressions which have the number In individual finger blocks circled on the attached cards are not susceptible of accurate Classification because of one or more of the various reasons listed below, each fingerprint card indicates by number or nota- tion on the back of the fingerprint card the particular reason or reasons for its return. (1) Ink was unevenly distributed (8) One or more fingers printed twice (2) Fingers not fully inked or rolled (9) One or more impressions missing Or Partially missing. (3) Too much Ink Please indicate Itthere is an amputation. If no amputa- (4) insufficient ink tone,obtain these fingerprints. In cases of bent Or i (5) Some Impressions smudged,possibly lingers slipped paralyzed fingers,it is suggested that a spoon or similar while being rolled,or fingers not clean and dry Instrument be used and the fingers be printed individually (6) Ridge characteristics not distinct,possibly due to the (10) Fingerprints not In sequence in spaces indicated nature of the individuals employment or some other (11) impressions not black on standard white fingerprint card cause. Legible prints may be obtained after a few days stock (7) Hands have been reversed (12) Fingerprint ink not permanent. Due to the volume of fingerprints contained in the fingerprint files of the FFI1,and the use of super breakups and extensions in conjunction with the Henry Classification System.It is necessary to obtain exact ridge counts and tracings of all ten fingers in order to search our tiles properly. in the event of serious injury to a finger precluding the taking of prints of the finger at this time,it is suggested that printing be done at a later date when a complete set of prints may be secured, It is suggested that reprints be obtained and forwarded to the FBI for appropriate action. When submitting the reprints it is not necessary to return the original fingerprint Card,as only one copy of each set of fingerprints is necessary for retention in this Bureaus files. For your information,a check by name only has been made on theenciosed pants with negative results. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Identification Division FBI Note; illegible fingerprint cards submitted In connection with licensing or employment for which you are paying a fee must be returned with your resubmission of prints In order to receive credit for your original payment, Please Note Instructions on Reverse Side. • 40 gthc.)371 � Please Note Because of the vastness of our fingerprint records,it Is imperative that the complete classification formula be emplgyedfoe . searching and filing in each Instance. Accurate classifying depends primarily upon the beat possible rolled impressions that can be taken. Fully rolled,clear impressions allow for accurate pattern differentiation,ridge court%ieliosl aclng.end Interpretation of whorl types. It Is suggested that each newly completed fingerprint card be examined to ascertain If It can be fully classified,bearing in mind the following; (1)loop-type patterns cannot be classified unless the center of the loop,the delta,and the ridges between them are clear, (2)whorl-type patterns cannot be classified unless the deltas and the ridges connecting them are clear, (3)arch-type patterns can be classified as such only If a sufficiently clear Impression is obtained to permit identification of the pattern as belonging to the arch category. While a concerted effort is made to retain every fingerprint card forwarded'..us for processing,in some instances this is not pea. sible. The FBl tufty recognizes the occurrences of situations which challenge the ingenuity of the identification oMlcertc secure legible impressions. All returnedfngerprintcardsdonotnecessariyreflectupontheabiliyoftheoperaWetakingtheprintsandnoretume are made at any time with ouch thought in mind. Your earnest Cooperation is solicited in obtaining the best possible impressions in each block on each fingerprint Card for- warded us for search. By so doing you are rendering a valuable seMCe and maidrg a major contribution to all agendas partldpating in the fingerprint exchange program. •U.9,GOVCRNA[NT PRINTING Orrlcc -7a2_a44reros. • 'y1:71 ® I LEAVE BLANK I TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLAMIUOLECKNYE Ej LEAVE BLANK , APPLICANT LASY NME NAM N.L, NWE F /-Icp, n/� (.C%L'R3� A/c SIGMA KOF NRS P� EN INTL ALIASES AKA �AESF ']�Q0E1 i,, 1` I P 0060 li 890734651108 c/1,.r ,14, t 4,-/gaay, a. SO OLNCL OE AYSo•PINLEYP L, E I GREELEY CO/ "Milk BOB /'// , 4. n / $ N o.. LCIL N.1-' (d 10 p'USU/ tnInMSNI. CT! er. E I r.r. .r,r, 1 E>fs AIR rL EOP MAIN VOB ' GSA ��iI4 hIi:` ,ac�i�,� �.�.,,� I�IPo,J �o OATK i NbNAIUIe of Or IAL 4L1 NNOEN✓NI _ ' YUUlf NO. O C LEAVE BLANK �} �'/ ()(e. C 4 C....•{_.0..- 4cF�L) EMPLOYE E ANDAOOIESS j f ,Nv. FNI - CL 155 1_,51(n� . AINEOFORCESNO. MNJ1 - . "rc- -' ! If7FtrntJ' I Y Nf.[. NEASOn FIN4E YPN'.eI I w' L SEOUN'.15 E.G. SOc - i N'.t;1.;-co C Y.19' tCLLLLx EOm NO. MNV - ,:hi (/ I (� �� .�A}��,� k 'ti q5 � � /t +* ll ..cO�l ./1,111"11-- �' d ', L5 1�S�11� '''':4F' 4 P s',;,,41L�� r,1 t NrI �� 1>�y �� !�,�ti �.: 1'C, ._ C.,1:1 ` l‘g /, fir n fV,, L �.t?^5�_ Neu '. Y 1 10,-•• (. R.lYUfa P MIDDLE A N.RING 5. P.LITTLE \' 1 ntlil P! 1 '' � - PQ* I (% rte.. r I ., ._. rlE\ x I, i//,.�sus.: .4i..v ��1� lul,lY� . .�f�;;, .,� . a. N. L.Tnuxe j 1. L.mOEL LtJ' z_S P / e. L..MIOOLE j e5 �1F ',%%"5`NV P.�I S 15a \�� *,r r h/7:f . LEFT FOUR PINLEM TAKEN LMULTASEQ SLY ,'. L.MULIE I.TSUn - INUIT POUR PINCERS TAKEN ANOLTMEOUSLY I FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537 I LOOP .F•�' APPLICANT / -.' • lam-,.,\ ;ENT,'1 1 ctrn / i 1 •/MTA N CLA •ICIA(LF INr,ERFa •F �l1TILT .� r,� A OF LOG • �4 , , /1 X � \ �w- D t HUTF IHA EVENLY ON IH[ HG SLAF.. 1•J ,i)S�j rA c, \\�\ *ACM AND DRY F NGEI15 THOROUGHLY [[1( r� • .!.iE^ ' q0.„L EkOH MAIL TON AN)ARf(u(L !NG '�1,4-, • TO • ISLP nr, n,�,Y1-4.-1,9- "eta -1 el._ - `+.^ r „kE IMPRC 6:'ON:ARE RECORDS)IN CORRECT°FLAALNNNFN V jv7 1 I�rfr,m AN AMI'UTAT:ON OR DIFOFM.T! MALES I, MPOS51 III C TO P4:N1 A 1ING[F1 MAK1. A.HOITT.�IFI, I -, : � . rl:pp(T IN THE INDIVIDUAL O[M — HAT FIN uLOCIF. D! c[" ,0M[ 'NV,':.CA".. CONDIT'ON HAILE', IT MPOSS''":9LE '0 CB AIN PERFEC`. :'MPRC5510N:, :UIIMI; ,..„2------...";i1. 4 I 1EST 'RA' CAN LE OI} A'NCD W'TN A Mf Hl STAP_FO 7 NF CARD CXPLAINING INC CIM. ' I CO MST AN CE S • ,Xn•I NE THE CO PLITCDD PILNTS TO -,re II THEY CAN PC C R A 51FIED E,EA4C. IN HIND THAT Till ItiFti IIIWf'"N rENlf R OF 1 FINULHYh14 S I ALL INTO THE PA'TL N. .HORN ON 1N . LARD I0.HEW PAT l r RN5 OCCUR CIP AND DI I,TA MliRT SHOW 1 OLENT LY ANO ARE NOT SHOWN H-REI. 2- WHORL _ _—-____. ___ __ THIS CARO FOR USE BY: LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK I Lbw :LGEm( A FMEIE ^PPIN1 N ALF._- 416:"I SR.l`ti 4N-47;at`• r—_ V Dri.Tn n 2c'.. ( AND,OCA 1 II a rJ!r. /'FINA,�XAS• )L� L rtNl INSINI F A AV OH. i:// 1 \ � 11 (�i f IA-L r AND APP FA RNFY P,\‘''''.‘ -,-;,'1, F A Ht .H. Ir. A.Ei AI A I .� ORDI ≥/AI \ / F'"1 NF[ PFC F rA LY OAST A Y All Ai!' S':!iu'T lA THISFF-0 H W -{, J Y[I+NMEFT AEA-FACIE`, AND HTHcR :N Ili RE • 'UINE FEDERAL LAW F Al CF FFDFHAi t r fq Au EL'J I ARR. f_ INC V 10 M4 111 Uh' HA VFAN RI ,r F,HIIT IF ! ^11 JTI`H'. 1NI r.r L NES LUNNING HCTWLE. I ,NSTRUCTIONS HI (■/�'.©RD L'A!: Must 01'_ CLEAR II ut F.RS BE CIECKE IIRL PR�EV VIn i TFIDENTIFICATION !!U F A . A� THOLE 3 ARCH FINC.E.HR NTS FOR WHIG, NO DISJLAL F Inc RECORD I/!!► FN NO LOCAL T SHOULD RE `,JHRITTEO FOR FII _ . ��rr CHECK ONLY F' %ACV AC G 4 P L IBAsErt NAME " A A I AL A C OR LOCAL nGC T FS I - //// \\ .N� I CR LIAL FC1 h r L 1EN t RR()1 STED OASIH QR V�( R.' \\� ICH DI O l i ANDATORY CF C L4'ARY BAST Or �. ! i / //�i \\ �\\�� I nuTHUR r FOR ri M ,0\CITATION $1,1 G V p, W IrN WI 1. /A/�/ A A'VA__ .1' I Cr MADE VRAP Nn L . ONa / lOF coF Lr f Mfr/q i R, 5F,A I I E.,r. A 0 A:,,,,RFS1 01110 11 I IA /,,, I n Au Of IF AGI 'I ,1w11 r,,, 1HF 1 10,11,11114W ___• r - ARC IVf PW py • ' •N' ,C -'" i I ?f„l1FrC- ' W 68 l % I! `FNMHP'P IF,rJFNGw,7,�HOu4uAn S ftP Rt.I' _4N 'Mr APPLOPRIAII CF ANEOUS NO RECORD. OTHER ARMED FORE S NG. - I n SPOFF NDti(PFI,i4frM CV'rATIaFJ O.AKI PORT56 J.AI'I 40 • _ _. ARCNFti HAVE NO DELTAS j JwTY Q41PDfV�R /Vi4 1J,6;100 •.3fr� Il a aT,OQvaolo3 AN ,SDMINISfikkp llrl ed.hhe �(JY� L1 ,.,LA RC, 7'.71 , uS GOVN:NNMLNT Pw NTlN„ Lir ricat.. 11110 ..x-,1, 4.92 7MAR 1 4 1989 � 890371 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK FBI LEAVE BLANK „ ‘ Lk",NEME NAM NOT SAM! MIDDLE NAME \I APPLICANT = el) SSe l a l-/ din,r ,eye:, SIGN LAEorTip, INGE r INTE ALIASES AKA o C00 2CC00 890734650710 $6 DOB .. Lir ,��.. GREELEY CO -,E DE A.On x ,,Dena o1 PERSON r.IrcEunMX.eD SjUTGE�� + Month D.. v... �v 1J- Oz( bs y3 �'7G l (... En5X � sEn xnfE X4r, .pi E�CS XMA IULF Or BIxin POB e,O M r C . as--z:, ( .>. v ‘E iii � 0 .�avr eo O.f1ct�� cTueE Or Or naA As, anceevxi«T5 ♦AA:t OCA LEAVE BLANK 6N7 C _ EMPLOYER Amu,DDR ,1tip gM -0,s.b FBI NO. roi CLASS 4 219 Grle2 3 Ax.EO.owCE5AO MA./l�yC/JJ/J�LJ��/ �rA5 f�OS / e,14 Yx.ufEV uL AL if CJuiT,Xo. SOC urt. 2/quote ,Ue.-.EN;C I s2/-58 M '74 9_ msclu Enwus NO. MNu i!J 7 f /Y, , R.!«JNN 1, u_.doft 1/y� 1 R M!OOLE l R.I ION:. 5.. R.u!TLf 'y`lc V l a - b si.liume ... l.. L lion b. L.MIDDLE E.L.RING Io L.LITTLE ` 9®3'7i I •2 PL. Mr NZ \ f-76 i C, 5i5 •. 3 ~ LIFT IDUN IM4[R TAKE*LYYITLKIWSIT L TMDW I.THIN! !MKT POW[IIMGHS TAXIY YYIILTMIIWXI I (= FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON. D.C. 20537 :, LOOP - - f - APPLICANT //r'+ � \�\�\� N cN I / ! ��\ .UGH AN LA IP Atl C F' QFNF I(9, OF' LOOP rigAOA T�0. I T 1v*y A S t AAA T- TI a cure INK NGEWSV THONO INUGH ',LAB A n AND DNS ARCA%NA I.TO 1. A ��. 4U1. NLERS FNpM NA I.Tp NAIL ANO AVOID 4L UWM , •NGFR`. TO;LIP, _ :— r ,4E IMPRESSIONS ARE Hi CONDEo"N CONHFL' ONDFv - r`_ - + AN AMPUTATION DR DEFORMITY +AV,ES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A V NUE11 MiE C A 4J"/1.0,4 A,' A -----. 'O'R AT EFrFC' N THE ".NDIVIDUAL FINCI W RI.Occ 9!L TA • ,,ME +HY EA. CONCITION HANES '.T M S C. 'U U1 AIN LEArEC PRESSIONS SUBMIT NI AE:' 'HA '-AN ,t 'J TA NF 1!'N 4 MIMC .I ro'c'. '0 HE CARL !.IHLAIF!NG 'HE ._Id. f ~ CUMSTANCES. " IYAMINF 7H, COMPLL TIC RIN 'f_ '.r 'IIrY CAN KE .ASSIFIE 1 Ai:ING N MIND THAT Km r 'MI !rt TIVE EN CF:NrfY PI +„t; CINCFRPRINTI FALL N•U EHT PAI'TANS '.TOWN ON THIS CARD U'HER. I•A TTE.N5 OCCUR TOP AND I'F.L'A MU.T `HOW NEILQIIrN-LY AND ARE NOT SHOWN NE RE . 1_ WtiOFL THIS CARD FOR USE BY 1EAYE THIS ;PACE BLANK J ,E.t.T ' t _ _ NFIIPCF.4 NT ICJ 4!'IF' Yf Y G AP.,.I '4 + �r-i \^—\\• \ E.C_A J A f HIAW'F I 1 v0 l 1A /� k CAL -I 1 AN 'CA Vr EN Y V r' R. l J(ll/� AR\°l�1` y g I L Y eh E INO AN NM AJTHUR. 'q /�/ ! III ILL 1M/ 1� y /rr f S STA TF AND AP H Vf AI TURNS' - 0 0 /1l Sl; tr 1 1 i F THE 4..TKO STATES A D ^4) Y ON C' a A c/,1 ul‘' / •,n LESS',Pr('FICA On FULN AJJL,CAAL1 S 1 NN �1 /._ Ar 'CSATISFY HIikF U MFI.'_,• y hf -w - 1 OVERNMEY A t EIES AND TV HER ENTITIES RE- Cr)En 0 Y ,. i OUTAF)1 Y FEDERAL LAM - ry9 i '1f F f Al 'JF F'1 PALLY C_tlA Nr'JCR IN`I XF RAN(. ww ['! �. - en C• 1 I.INS IL) PNUMOTF M A'N IH ECi 11i A C) n /F -HOSE INSTITUTIONS y b 0 6 A THESE LINOS RUNNING DETWFCN I INSTRUCTIONS. ^ z X Fa 0 DELTAS MUST DC CLEAR .'uINTt MUST FIRST BE CHECKED THiUUGH T ^�'�A �'( z t, ?MATE STATE IDENTIFICATION 'IUNEAU AND 0 OS ! l��O"D ry Nyi 3. ARCH FINGERPRINTS FOR WHICH NO DI DUAL 1Y'.'NO RC• ! 'llff//��II 4 PEEN FOUND LOCALLY SHOULD PE LBFITI F(i FOR FBI /� I 'EAR H. !v Fy // se "1‘,,CA B• • 'f S\' \'.^' I'. NH RACY ACT C 'KU IP1. Vl lJq 4'OVIRF$ 'NAT FEp. • J �� _� V' S�•' SNAL TATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES NFpR ' 'A' p ME CHECK ,7 !1//774',:-...- \\\\ \\ *HOSE DISCLOSURE SECURITY NUMBER R OWN Or row 1//7W / 'uCI DDC CSVkF IS MANDATORY OR TOWN Nn BAWL Or /,,iO,--74,,,�\\�\ IUTNOR.7Y FOR SUCH SOLICITATION AND SE$ ARCH WILL OE MADE OF IT. / ' `\� 1' / -� IDENTITY or kIVATE CONTRACTOR' '.MOULD BC SHOWN /�/�� '—'�,4 ` N' SPACE "EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS". NF CONTRIBUTOR IS w - f '4F NAME OF THE ADENCY SUBMITT Nv THE F NGERPRINT �—.'..+ I CARD TO THE FBI. __ J J, FBI NUMOERI F KNOWN SHOULD A",LAYS BF FURp'I ''�j'''d c— am CC1 _/� H THE APPROPRIATE SPACE (� 1• 00 MISCELLANEOUS NO RECORD OTHER ARMFD FCRCES NO„ PASSPORT NO. (PP), ALIEN REGISTRATION NC.(AR), PORT SE- ` JANI -a0 • ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS CURITY CARD N0, IP5), SELECTIVE SERVICE NO (55), RfK�KR-` `r� �S�y.� P� ' ANS'ADMINISTRATION CLAIM NO 'VA). )51 nd3anp OQ�aV AOJ f01+e!SIP.1.I 7:: 1: V.S. OOV EwNIM E'NY PNINTING or-EEC?.' 19]n-- 17A-LW A�h• - 1 t ; "'"1/4) 2 7 MAR 14 1989 • • X3 3'71 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK ' Eel LEAVE BLANK APPLICANT 1 ' LASTNANE NAM FIRST SANE MIDDLE NAME ,. SF k//7.,U /do2.FnN /50C 5 LNAT11 -O ,0 E,NGERRRIN ' I ALIASESCOD 620000 nKA 0' 890734650808 MPMr.eti ‘ So — GREELEY CO I,,,,t4.t.. DOB D., 6▪ /769 Q 3 2 ! ,\.t\ o , /a tic/ l i,,L€SSN•v` 1 '\s- I II, e.CE ncc .t1 EVES AIM K s e Or wIN POB 1,e.-•l\ or.4 CC.-,.., . cEbSO1 I , ,\ { I r ( W.I Sb4, II</o 173, O -thebl)ergmcn7 do ,a ▪ur/ .r.A.uamcLint IF.'..46rINctsa4INI 'Qu CA LEAVE BLANK G1(-ha_ ,IL I— ILTN - r: EN✓LOTEM ANDADDtEEs TA C� - rul No. FRI 9.. TA /_/12! I P1CPt s j AnmED tutILL1 N0. MNu - L—jy�,.C MT-.n ` -.4 __ ( ,i S-61,-.7)) uN 4tASJN r'.NLF R'N.ED SLOAL StILNITN 6.4 S00 -- - A/91)°,-- //Cpnc.P 523 54 5323 MI SCELL ANKOUS No.. MNO 1) 08 0l C: o`t 4: a I. R.'NUNN I N.INut' 1. R.MIDDLE 4 R.RINs s. R LIT.LE c:r loZ r)102 3 o r = -, y: i t I "W1 6. L.M.46 T. L.INDEX R. I. 51001.1 ` 17 T V.L.RING 10 L.LITTLr - - ., :. r.., j4� E f„A:"... J' N. - Jti J -. En IC 5.•4 ,... 890371 ' i LEFT SOUR FINGERS TAKEN LAWL6ANmuSLV L.TNUYS R.THUMB INGOT POOR MGM TAKEN RM,ULTANEOUSL�ITT-t— u r FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION . UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, Q.C. 20537 E. LOOP 1 APPLICANT r a ' I GE L OOR I 100PI AIN CLASS,FIABL FINCEwr 1 TS fff\\\ V 5 .AUKE / K AND N4 EVENLY ON INKING:LA B. S}AS� V��_ I .YASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY • iC V�1� V\C ' v NOLL F INCEk5 FROM NAIL 10 NAIL AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS '0`411'_ / SQ= F IRI:'.MPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.. L N~ ' AN MAP,I'1 AT ON OR DEFORMITY RAF.FA II IMPOSSI HLE TO PRINT A FINL,{1, MAXI- A NOTATION '1 _ ---- `0 THAI ENE f CT IN THE INDIVID'JA'. INCrER BLOCK. . lea '''•r. __ OLLTA 1 F SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MACES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPR ESSIDNS, SUBMIT ,Ciy "^u 'Hi 'JEST THAT CAN RE OBTAINS': WITH A MEMO STAPLED "0 'HE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIR CUMST ANC F S. I FAMINE ;HE COMPLF TED PRINTA TO SEE '.F THLY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, FARING IN MIND THAT I I HI INIS 1! TWEIIN CFNTi II OF !,. MUST FING1RPR':NTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON TN'', CARD OTH.w PA':'"ERNS OCCUR I DOD AND O!',TA MUST SHOW I NII,EOUENSLY AND ARE HOT SHOW?!HERE. 2. WHORL THIS CARD FOR USE BY: LEAVE THIS SPACE BEANK A P FLOC(MI NT AGF NC./ F 'NI " .C7,4••••-_,- 3,---W,yl'1' r-- ANTS rG- AR,X H FFi NI POD 1 A S , AI J[.L1A [ PIA CF A F AND LO A V C F N R P //%�f} �15V>jV I PI I I nI mrn v _ Al In e_ hi�' 1Y //� qS�/ �^: S, ATE a S 6D TFT I 5L TC AND ESA L /I TN n 'CNN(4DI N Y Y •.t EF OF IC h ED TA -S FA RDI. d' ../04' I IV] ,P1 RCA,Li'MASFL 0,4 NFL i iriFp, I lC NH in Sl i,AI I UN„ SA SFr 'HS .1 [TIC.• Hr., _ yr NN ENT AGENCIE" AND 1 a 1X11 EL RF ?I II H I - UI)RED Err FEDERAL LAW ...d FCAI OF FNFRALLA T_HAk N 41N A_K 2 — n y1 N 1 II' 1l, MMI.M.i'[ Lw MA AAL.!! 00 !CO.!'Y ). AA �. I JrTHOS.( N. OT CNS. •J/ R a THEE LINES RUNNING OCTw[EN I INSTRUCTIONS: � C®{ ��,z, M �' 'JLLE AS MUST BE CLEAR I POI UST FIRST I CHFCnrD , ':UGr RD. A y PA,ATE STAFF ".DE TIFICA'IDN l HEAD AND ONLY THOS ~ - 3. ARCH 11 [[RRRINTS F OR FINCH NO c 'DIA PING PECORO HA • • ��}777 �� }r X FOUND .D ALLY SHOULD BI SU!MATTE., FOR FR, • ��/ 'EARC (� NAME CHECK ��F'Y YSNhN �97 PLVACY Ad, O /t P. 1S4 R van //%// \ N' ERAS A E OR RITY AGENCIES OUFS LEVY 5 I/f /� ;co�\\N ` \ WHOSE SOCIAL SEC,R Y NUMBER IS REDU;t r0 wHE,NCR //I S\\\ N\, SUCH D CLOSURE MANDATORY OR VC L TART BAST OF �1.1�4V�'A MAD ITT FOR SUCH SOL' RA'ON AN) :SF) WFI H WILL /ii/j.1C-\\�` r OFMADE CF IT V ,,,,01,1"1-1.11-,-1---\ 1, D TV GF HIV\ [ ADDRESS" OR `_,.1:0[UL !I O v �i — 'Al SPACE 'EARLO FM AND ADDRE 5 CGN IFI:pH::: I R S '.�./�• 'HF XAM[ DF iHF AGENCT SUBM F Gr RPR rv1 T CAd L THE FBI. i •//ff/ L FBI NUMBER IF kN GWN S.C LLD A AY. B1 Fukr�SrIFGZI kd £'s ��^((� 1�--.01I////-1.. IIII��II '8)/,F) '.N E APPROPRIA r PACE. 1 W:46 1 w'LEL ANECUS NC RECORD. OTHER RFD FOPCF,5LNO, rS J PAS5POW NO ',PP ALIEN REGISTRATIO NO. IA POI1O.EFSV N. ..•�.... J'ILT". l61r1+`I. 1 I��N 'LVIlY CARD NC. SELECTIV SFRV F NG. ,n: Ana oovaoioa ARCHES HAVE N '�W'1y �EnV�o] AN', ADMIN'.TRATCN CLA`A NO •VA y •-1 - J� 103 y rl .Y YCv./ . .. .l u.S. 4UVVNNMCNT oYITINI. J1.VICS. .I. r 4.1.x: .V ;.; . MAR 1 4 1989 890371 ILEAVE BLANK , I TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK - Ent LEAVE BLANK 1 SEkide APPLICANT -q�c '� LAST MAME NAM NOSY NAME WOKE NAME ' � — ft P017)742 Lem T!GN,TIU ;,.P!:NSOMFwaERrRI ALIASES AKA rt C0C62apC0 890734651010 GRE£LEY CO OAIEJF!en C: c I SO ES.DMA. .ERgNP / RM,E4 - NG DOB 'e/C)'/ �GU'� ‘"-C I t �‘ / 9 ' 7 C !ZENSMI• ,N CE Nnq MpC ETES MMR . EL ON a x1n pOP /r .E , IN NA GE �� 2/ ��c o. I7 pF fl wyyLryy CA LEAVE BLANK EM-Lore,,AND ADDILss - v 1I EQI mo. FBI) CUSS - - ' I ,PRED FORCES NO. MNU REF REASONPIN ENI'NINTED I SOCIIAALLL stCA `/ Ni Tn MO. so//70.+( �• �✓ ,Z-th.--,..•;..t2> 1 MISCELuNEODS NO MNU ?() 1 Gig I Oct O t I1 I = 4 . P,*sump I. R.Icon{ J, R,YIOOLF I I R.RIML 5 R-UTTLf . ft, iD oei I in at et, rA U ':.'‘:-.6 r • 0- Y" ;- / A. L.THUMP T. L INDEX P. L.M!DOLE 'it�1/.,. V.L.RONO !0 L.LITTLE • 1� �4 .4.11:1, .;.,.� • 8903, 1 4 �1 14-ccd r t 1/)i,L M' E i 1 „ .1 LEFT IOW.FINDERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY L.mass P MUMS MCAT POUR FINGERS TAKEN SYWLTAMEDUSLT I FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20537 .. LOOP I APPLICANT �•w A I GENICH /� , TO OBTAIN CLASS FIA ILE FINOERPH NTS �[,, DF LuOP 2”1/7/l'/,',)Y� �l �� I ,� 1 _ � r Ln Ark «N C � \ \ \\\�`_ pl h RU.L INK EVENLY ON OUG L iLAP. DSc' L - WASH AND DRY FINDERS THOROUGHLY. \\VS\••1 \ �� 5 ..OLL F GERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL. AND AVOID AI.OM,NG['NE,.. ES TO SLIP. ;IF DERE HoricEssiONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER_ . '',I AN AMP JTA'ON OR DEFORM TY MAKES IT IMPOSS RLE '0 {RINT A RNGER MARE A NOTATION TO`.HAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER ROCK Of 5'5A ' 5 c .OME PHI SIC AL CON'DI 5,0N MANES rT IMP BSSIBLL I,. VIITA'.N Or Fir IC, 'MPR ESSION!. SU Boot l' ,.G ilk HE ',EST 'HA CAN PPE DATA NED N'TN A m.,m0 N„PL ID TO THE CARD E/PLAIN''.NC, THE CR. CUMSTAN CE S. /,AMINL :HE CDKPL FEED PRINTS TO SET F THEY CAN PC CLAiSIE'ED .FARING iN MIND THAT THE LINES NETWEEN CENT1 V 01 L yOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PAT!_kM5 SHOWN ON TN Js CARD.'OTHER PAT'ER«S OCCUR i- L 00° AND Dr..TA MUST ^HOW "MFREOUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOMN HEFF ... WHORL TIE'S CARD FOR USE BY: LEAVE THIS SPFCE CLANK M Lt MEN I Ay N S' C MP41V1 N A`' �ee ^•�r5�A 'v ANI LR lA FNEyk i / C DELTAI G. AL S'ATE A D a V .iN NT /Y / /19,�� \1t l�v F LYMT 1 LICE K ', n R AA AL R. �� A STATUTES AND AFP4 'HE A UN A , S I N n( n THE JNI FD STATES A AND GLNTVPROP- \ /*� - F API'CI ICAL t TRAM L APP f.ANII TAL 4' 1LUNG'',A IN- IN"._Rf"y 4[MFNT,• t GOVERNMENT •GF CIIS AND 3TrirP EN Is RF. u BY FEDERAL LAN n F FO Nn r IAWT 6 ,k r.lu 1 n 'A }}.. .10 iS uMB II AN AN IHI /RII! `� I — .: :,r hl NS PUT 0ek SI '' THE v IN'S RVNNINC RETWI IN I INSTRUCTIONS. Rr. GOR '�y y DELTAS. ' lINT HIE. GI.,AR IA MUST FIR BE 1ICAE0 I.+JuGN O• 6.. WE Si R'A C D''AT E IDENTIFICATION BUYEAG, AND NU ,HOSE '$ hj 2Af 3. ARCH CFMpPIN S FOR WHICH NC 3".SD A F ING RECORD HA' N, O n BEEN FOLN LOCALLY SHOULD BE B .I'.TED FOR FBI �.�• • (��!y( �(�,4 .ARCH ^{1 �A�,1 NAME AUEIa* �� Y A- .. \\ PR VACV ACT OF t/a P L %)- / RFO YA` N �E`V.-i �, -Z\\ A 'N IROL STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES NF J,d. ,J M -1J i �//4( �\ N. -, MHOS SOCIAL .-CURiTY N IMn R EOue .FD nFTnfR ti. 'V r�</%�i \\\\�_, '.:CN ',CLOSURE ANDATGNI G VCLU TART BASIS OrCI I AUTHOR TY FOR DAN DL TAfIDN AND USE. MMCH WILL ��i 'N‘t,? MA O IT a � _ ( GENT Y V PR VA E CONTRACTORS HJLLD BE HEWN /N� �`� N SPACE "EMPLOYER AND ADDRESS", H CCNTR BUTGR R AWO' _ G"� HE NAM( OF 'HE AGENCY SU.IMII NG THE F,NyrRPR FIT �. CARD TO THEE ' K ' I. FB NUMBER, IF MOWN SHOULD ALWAYS 3D E I'RN' u:,D., 4r VR�u 68 ry•'�•• I =�/�i/. , IN THE APPROPRIATE PACE. G, 't O GGI� Q 1 I•j/ II IN MISCFLLANFO IS NO. RECORD OTHER ARMED FORCES NOI .. N Its rosd5JI S[POET NO (PP), ALIEN REG'STRA N NC '.AR), PORT W. A Nit ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS CORr4Y CARD NO.(PSI,SELECTIVE SERV 6E NO -�t{I:y vwf M: A-`�,�,-- �O/� ,(,+, -C AN'5'ADMINISTRATION CLAIM NO.WA.,'. nv3 '''ls QQyaw !, V9. GOVENW'sarti Tlnr N/ Arc r' Prot.... /I,..1'_..`. ILO 2 71MAR : 4 1939 • n� N y 89®371 LEAVE BLANK TYPE OR PRINT ALL INFORMATION IN BLACK FBI LEAVE BLANK LAST NAIIF NAM FIRST NAM[ NIDOLE SM.0 APPLICANT '• �. r ),.. . rrc . m ,{ GIRPMNTFD LASE, AKA IR C00620000 890734650906 AtuuEAL r i LR .� Sail so BOO RE J ��` GREELEY CO �'/ za ! � Gyc' 6 t l• ✓EN,r � I I ne, n DFAl" ROB L. O-n9 FFf c Yt c.°l M ' L1/4w• U S A pi W I b I .20G I a'rxl 9r. . .Lc�l raoErt.4°0 Y�/ n /Cf. l,,,m0)a` F,CA LEAVE BLANK Jp" ASS ARMED ADNUE5 ND. MNU - Rff. u. . N,INPou ,, S:JSIA'., r.1. '1) SOC AOCE,,ANLDD+mi. MNU LA I �_5— -[y,.. 4TH . / ' ya �/if x �f. ..r' ..C„.._ '- .. 1. N. •N UMII Fyn 1. R.(IDEA 1 N.MIVULE 4 U.RING { 5. R.LITTLE V o� � w �� Y • N ir Tw //i vqq / \4 re -..? ✓ 4. 1'Si I0NN /, L-INDRA S L MIDDLE I.L.RING I ID. L 4'TL[ Y.-� Sf i e»•_ 3f�T C . Y' I"' A v./4YIIs. w/ 890371 ",::;,::,-.-.L.',.:4. ;I :i LIFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN 51WLTANEOUSLT L.THUMB R.THUMB RIGHT FOUR nNG[Rf T1[[N YMVLTUI[OUfLT J i FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537 I. LOOP APPLICANT \ LEN lTER o Y/ \IT:R. C. ` OF LOOP T00(1TAN [LA SIhIAh F FNGC RPk,rygy , r: -- -� A YRII F+';III �\ ; dct* S SAT.t I - S RP.U.C INK EVENLY ON INKNO iLAq_ / SS" NASH AND DRY F'NGERS THOROUGHLY. S� ..i.-:.,,---=\ ROLL FINGERS IRON.NAIL TO NA AND AVOID CTALLOWINGW INGF,I'S TO 561P- --� _ PE SURF INPRFS5 DNS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER. 5. F AN AMPUTATION OR DEFORMITY MAKES MPOSS".SLE TO PY:NT A CµC.EW r,AAE A NO AT".GN 0 THAT EFFECT N THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER RLO('K 0ELT'T F ',OA< PHYi CAL CONDITION MAKES IT "..MPOS IRLF TOO TAIN PEREEC N.Pt:E S:'ON SLRMI NC LIFT THAI CAN HF DH TAINF,j WITH A mruo0 iT APL FD TO 'THf CARP PXPLAININC, -HE [',R• CUMSTAN('ES. ,IAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE it- ',ICY CAN RE CLASSIFIED HEARING N M'IID THAT I THr LINES RI TWEE\ crN'ER or '.. ,I' AND OE LtA M LS' F.NGFRPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS ',HORN ON THIS CARD(OTHER PAT':RN')OCCUR -- If':T SHOW N REh.JE4T'LY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE', 2. WHORL THIS CARD FOR USE BY: LEAVE ENISS SPACE BLANK N w �1 .. ,W AR ANTOWEimt AGENCIES IN '- ,,or RP APE.' AN FUR LA,.ENUERCEmEN1 .R / I .' ' GE, C LSOFST TF AND-O CAL VF, 1 '. I V •,r L MF CZ rvS r n AIINC? 1I S. 1 !FI n U C TAT AND nPl uS r E n T RN ', 41 ,Y/ !� 1 V � !NE UNI to STATES E I G r CO p Cx ,,� /� LAS r ° IN r Pir re,IY Ro J A P Cn E n.v bk Ip._ I All U, TA SFY TH 5 NF M �,•_ } r� (HORT H4,APIT A( NCI AND 7 4 N THFS FF- y CUIRED FIN FEDERAL LAW 01 y ✓ +�- IAL OF FEDERAL 1 Y _+^ 4 R M FI ZANY. ' y INC N IT ORE TJPNy I L' MqN AN {CuR.r. M --., LE M r S ILLTIGNS H . n•TH(.SE LIARS RUNNING OC.TWE.'.N INSTRUCTIONS: o b p DELTAS MUST RE CLEAR I FINN'S MUST ED V FIRST BF CHECK HROIstOPRE 0 D rD NY PRIA STATE "IDENTIFICATION D REAU A HO y 3. ARCH IEIc d INt FOR WHICH NO DI A!IFVI EC- NG + OCA Lt O1L0 !( JIMIYTFD FOP F Ia FAR+ H E .'O• •• 1 /� 'r N\\ L,�y� / /�Y l•Z 4 SAEY ACT OF Pi 7.1 P,L 'NC/Y R UIJIRF$ THAT 1--•..c CH � \-- RAF S A F OR LOCAL AGENCIES y.��1aA{.��p��w}�(111��JJy�,, 1'1,\•Fj1,^N{c` Y Pdi/// k\\\ , , HOSE l A SECURITY NUMBER RI�w:L.Y'H, R /// \\\\\ N� SUCH ',CLOSURE I$ MANDATORY OR VO' UNTARY DAS S OF �CS��V� AUTPCR TY FOR SUCH SOLICITATION, AND JECS NH YII WILL ti.j/R� \\� 1{MA D T. /1 /j - ' ; S! I FN Y CF PRIVATE CONTRACTORS NJCLB IRER I OwN {//� - I N SPA "EMPLOYERA AND AD RE'. THE :pTR R L R C / - `y��T IF NAME OF THE AGENCY THJTPAITI NO NC F NGHPPR:NT /�/+- L_ -Y CARD TO THE FBI �� I. F6 NVMRFN "..e KNOWN ;HOUND AI AY'.. PC F NNSW' :ZI wa c 1 UU 8 ��/��/ i F THE APPR0PRIAT SPACE — 04 68 I _ M''ISCELLANEOUS NO RECORD- OTHER ARMED FORCES NO. r _ „y C� f 1PASSPORT NO 'PPE, ALIEN REGISTRATION NO IARI PORT�LS�Eis ' 7 . 'A ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS ' •a itUR1�" ARDnp P I SELECTIVE SERVICE NO. '151, VF$ ,)1_V:.'x33!\NI JO 'N M NS's M�� 7CLAIMN0 IRA . �y3W 8 OOd�OtOO "m"" '''77 V. ii. r•OVERNMLNT*MINTING p' C! IYYY - . n-In. (Y �.`• s k ti' v 00'✓?1070�.. �.02 7 MAR 14 1989 R90371 .• OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE 303 356.4000.EXT.4200 ( 1 P.O.BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 "Ripe • COLORADO March 30, 1989 Conrad Dale Hopp, President The Furrow Corporation 4301 Highway #66 Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Findings of the Investigation Concerning Your Application for a 3.2% Beer License for "Convenience Plus" for Consumption Off Premises. Dear Mr. Hopp: Please be advised that the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld. Colorado. has made favorable findings in its investigation concerning your application for the proposed 3.2% beer license, with the licensed premises to be known as "Convenience Plus" with the sales to be for consumption off premises. The on-site visit which was conducted by Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy revealed the following: a. The proposed licensed premises is not connected to a different licensed premises. b. The applicant's diagram of the proposed licensed premises is correct. c. There are no public or parochial schools, or principal campus of any college. university, or seminary within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed licensed premises. d. The notice of hearing was properly posted. The investigation of your character has shown that it is good and in accordance with Section 12-46-108(1) (b), C.R.S. As you know, the hearing on said license will be held in the First Floor Assembly Room of the Weld County Centennial Center, at 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, on Wednesday, April 26, 1989. at 10:00 a.m. Very truly yours, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO : COL DO • d �a Tr County Commi oner ,EXN'AM 6 89O371 o • NOTICE DOCKET NO, 89-16L PURSUANT TO THE LIQUOR LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE FURROW CORPORATION, D/B/A CONVENIENCE PLUS, 4301 HIGHWAY 66, LONGMONT, COLORADO 80501 , FAS REQUESTED THE LICENSING OFFICIALS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, TO GRANT A 3.2% BEER LICENSE FOR CONSUMPTION OFF THE PREMISES ONLY, WITH A LOCATION MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 4301 Highway 66 , Longmont, Weld County, Colorado DATE OF APPLICATION: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HAS DECLARED THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO BE SERVED WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: All of Sections 13 , 14 , 15, 16 , 21 , 22, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27, 28 , 33, 34 , 35, and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado THE HEARING ON SAID LICENSE WILL BE HELD IN THE FIRST FLOOR ASSEMBLY ROOM, WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, AT 10 :00 A.M. PETITIONS AND REMONSTRANCES MAY BE FILED AT THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WELD COUNTY CENTENNIAL CENTER, 915 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO. DATED AT GREELEY, COLORADO, THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 1989 . THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy PUBLISHED: March 22 , 1989 , in the Platteville Herald 890371 iXMis/7 3 Page-6 14-3 Mamb 22.19� "If fidavit of Pubttcatwn NOTICE AND CLERKTO THE BOARD DOCKET NO.89-16L PURSUANT TO THE BY:Mary Reiff,Deputy STATE OF COLORADO LIQUOR LAWS OF. CountofWeld ss. THE "'STATE OF Published hs tha Mgt.'I A.Winkler Wesel of said County of Weld bang duly sworn.My COL OTtADO, THE 22; tha I am publisher of FURROW CORPORA- lit . - PLATTEVILLE HERALD TION, D/B/A CON- that the same is a weekly newspaper of general caculatSon was .Y£t$IENCE'PLUS,4301." printed and published In the town of HIGHWAY 66, LONG- PLATTEVILLE MONT, COLORADO in said county and state that the mace of sdverasement,of which 80501, HAS RE- newspaper annexed is a tare copy has been published in said weekly newspaper for QUESTED. THE LI- lY - consecutive weeks: CENSING;.<OFFICIALS- that the notice was published in are regular and end=issue of every ' OF, WELD COUNTY, number of add minelayer during the period mid rime orPublicallont CO;[O 0.0� '`:'T'Q`' of said notice and in the newspaper proper and not in•supple en thiaft that the flat pubimmn of said notice was contained In the 'GRANT A•32% BEER... of sad nerpaper beano`the date of CE !4A-4-42 19 F, and the last publication LIyIVSE-'fOR;.CON- thereof. the issue of said newspaper.bs•neg dam, $thMPTION' OFF THE � _ o PREMISES ONLY, e WITH a' LOCATION. ya} t ia that the said IYIOR E ,;;PARTICIt�s' PLATTEVILLE HERALD LARLY, `DESCRIBED" has been published continuously and unintenuptedly during the AS'J'OLLOWS:: period or at feast Nbe•two w+remnve weeks nett poor to the flat 43.01, Highway 66,,- tasue thereof containing sad notice or advertisement above refereed to: and that said newspaper was at the time of each of the -s Web Cal*, pubka&ns of said notice duly cr'-"d for that purpose within the Cobtado meaning of at act entailed. -An Mt Concerning Legal Notices, DATE OF APPI 1- Adve tisements and Publications and the Fees stele and Publishers r, and m what.n c.� l CATION: FEBRUARY' with of this A a d 1 1. / 28;.1989 -. tip and paA as � dad by an cc _. - •. • • .1 and an 13. 1' THE BOARD OF - COUNTY .. COMMIS-' —� F"b"'"er StONERS`.OF-WELD: and sworn to tore me this Wday of COUNTY, COL, 012,400;'•4FASe DE- CLARED•itt THAT THE l'` _ Notary PublicNEIGHBORHOOD—TO 415 DENVER VENUE BESERVED≥WILL BE- AS FOLLOWS: FT. LUPr0N, CO 80621 Allot sections 13,14, 15, 16, 21,':220,24,24,, -25,`26;x2"'28,:3.33 13344,, buy coennJeston expires June 1901 '35'w436 tit Township,.. lv:y Cc: :_:.n .rd:r,^;;:^c 30,1092 •3t4Orlh,Ranpe68 West. =ol,the; :M.,•Weld•- �wlntyt=Colorado THE.-HEARING Ott SAID', t",ICENSE"",WJLL- BE., HELD:..1N THE •FIRST,;FLOOR AS- SEMBLY ROOM, DATED AT_GREE- WELD COUNTY CBI- LEY, COLORADO, TENNIAL 'CENTER,. THIS 13TH DAY OF 915 1OOT&SBESr I MARCH,1989. BAEEt-EY, COLD - ° was .. . 13 A D O , ON THE BOARD OF WEDNESDAY,- APRIL' COUNTY 26,AT 1000 A.M. COMMISSIONERS I PETITIONS AND WELD-COUNTY- REMONSTRANCES%-,.• COLORADO MAY BE ED;pt AT THE'CLERK 40,114E BY:MARY ANN BOARD OF COUNTY FEUERSTEIN, COMMISSIONERS OF- 'WELD'COUNTY' FICE; WELD'COUNTY CLERK AND CENTENNIAL. CEN- RECORDER. TER, 915 10TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO.' • j 890371 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION t � State of Colorado County of Boulder - N ?TICE I, Dean G. Lehman ,do poesy rasa wfw4NT.'to'TNE uouos LAWS OF THE ATE F COLORADO.THE solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a F OW� CORPORATION.° nMA,__ AY daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in OS.CONVENIENCE cp oo outs REQUESTED THE uCEN&NO OP- the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and rICIALS-Or WELD COUNTY, COL„ which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and uceH a Oll CONSUMPTION,OPP THE PREMISES ONLY,W AOCH- L Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and _TION MORE PARTICULARLY uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months osscruesoanou-owsi. next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of cCowwy Wand* m. Wale' advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the DATIPOr'ArPtICAT1ON: N®auARY - 71,TEES United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions THE BOARD or COUNTY COMMI of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that -DRAW.W.HAS WELD COUNTY. THAT rNe is a daily newspaper duly Noonsosswoo.•to..se amino said newspaper p qualified for WILLITe AS FOLLOWS: publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning All Millesmnnt'IA IE:Ts]T;7L7]„ of the laws of the State of Colorado;that a copy of each number of Tw a � a MP* Mio ELL 33. na and 36In' the Em P.M.Weld Crony,CMmnde said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was THE NEARING ON SAID ucense published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the WILL SENELOPIN.TNE rststm.OOR AESEMSLY'ROOM,-WELD-COUNTY subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed comreNNul CENTER. MS ism enter, ornate, coLORADo. ON - mode of business in this office. WEDNESDAY,-APRIL 70.AtteAOAM,, sermon' AND REMONSTRANCES MAY q.FILED AT THE CIAR1 MTNE That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published soOso or -county comm. mom*: orrice,-war, county - CENTENNWL coots. E75 ,tarn - in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; assn.uncut COLORADO.- and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said - COLORADO.- DATED TJIAT. DAYOF MARCH THE SpOMARDasco0Nry . newspaper dated April 11 , 19 89. yyriorouc400 BY:MARYANN PEUERareIN, wnLO,COUNTYCLdx-AND AND CU I tOOSTNtSOARD.... .. r. aY:Mary RNR.Deputy ;wausMED, Mret $...alcin1SoUSLIS :M. Kr f�✓� THRIPC ll L Apra ii.t O W*$so r General Manager 'TI CsR L 1slno R co • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of Apr i ,19 89 ril ` Notary Public nnnn 1'F�A' 36.W My...CSOL9SSION 1 .•apyln 360 TERRY R. ST. Fw;`MVNe COLORORADOWW1 890371 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL Longmont,Colorado 80501 IN THE MATTER OF RESOLUTION RE: ESTABLISHING THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO BE SERVED, DESIGNATING A COMMISSIONER TO MAKE ON-SITE INSPECTION, AND SETTING THE HEARING DATE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE FURROW CORPORATION, DBA CONVENIENCE PLUS, FOR A 3.2% BEER LICENSE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Beard of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, at a public meeting on the 13th day of March, 1989, heard evidence to assist said Board in establishing the neighborhood to be served, designating the Commissioner to make the on-site inspection, and setting the hearing date concerning the application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus, 4301 Highway 66 , Longmont, Colorado 80501 , for a 3 .2% Beer License, for consumption off the premises only, and WHEREAS , the Board did determine that the following described area should comprise the neighborhood to be served concerning said application, to-wit: All of Sections 13, 14, 15 , 16 , 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 , 27, 28, 33 , 34, 35 , and 36 in Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board further determined that Commissioner Gordon Lacy be designated to make the on-site inspection concerning said application, and WHEREAS, the Board further determined that the hearing to consider said application shall be scheduled for April 26 , 1989 , at the hour of 10 :00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the above described area—be, and hereby is, declared to be the neighborhood to be served concerning the application of The Furrow Corporation, dba Convenience Plus, for a 3.2% Beer License, for consumption off the premises only. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Commissioner Gordon Lacy be, and hereby is, designated to make the on-site inspection concerning said application. /6) 890371 890250 msn4 Page 2 RE: SET HEARING DATE - CONVENIENCE PLUS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the hearing date concerning said application be, and hereby is, scheduled for April 26, 1989, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of March, A.D. , 1989. / / `?4,,�2,4A guat,1t.c �., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ( „ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder //.c-lei/ and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Chak man Spne (onsontProTem BY-. G'3?��.r_, eputy County C rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner - Q / z George Kne y J +,County Attorney / AL Gordon E. Lacy� 990371 . 890250 �% (/�/� EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case eO7/a .C�IPr�✓ iP�reQ avre /✓/Ws Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description +7' 'a. ��, .1.d am , "B. (�CF.�' A SZ(/ . iti',.y1.1O C. 4.102-1C74. 4' - ,' -)e, 4c.i-2. 00 D. cirr SiScia>e E. F. G. H. I. • • J.. R. L. M. N. 0. 890371 r t rJ • • 1/�n� _ ' } DATE: March 6, 1989 ii WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT it . WE HAVE RECEIVED AN APPLICATION FOR A 3.2% BEER LICENSE AT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Lot 1, Block 4 of Sekich Business Park, being a part of Section 23, Township , 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SITE? fianner/ VN,f v°uhr^ Mts+. it IS THIS TYPE OF REQUEST PERMITTED IN THE ABOVE ZONING? YeS r = j WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: //O/E1 PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WHEN COMPLETED TO CLERK TO THE BOARD'S , : OFFICE. ; DE UTY • • r f , 8903'71' — n. • RIOT WRITE IN THIS BLOCK DR L 403(Rey.0/83) r;,i,e'—"wr'pa STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENTOFREVENUE Ise 6 lea - DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT -4 'y..iii �h�`' 1375 SHERMAN STREET • DENVER,COLORADO 80251 USE LICENSE ACCOUNT NO. LICENSE ISSUED THROUGH FOR ALL REFERENCE (EXPIRATION DATE) • LIABILITY INFORMATION COLORADO FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE COUNTY CITY INDUSTRY TYPE LIABILITY DATF. (3.2% BEER) LICENSE APPLICATION KEY CODE STATE FEE I CITY I COUNTY PAID 459 37.1 I 49.1 (03) 1 TOTAL FEE Instructions on Page 3 of Application. ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN • 1.Name of AOpiicant(s): If pennersnip,bit partnen names lot least two);if corponBOn,name of OOr9OtatiOn: ' Data filed with LOW AuthOnty: The Furrow Corporation ,ZI2,71?r/ Stitt Sales Tax No.. I 14-27115 2.Trade Name of Enab)iahment: (08A1 Business Telephone: Convenience Plus I (303) 535-4606 3.Acores*of Premises: (Exact location of premises mutt be given.Give street and number.when possible.If piece to be licensed is located ina town or rural district where it is impossible to give street and number,the lot and block number Or part 01 section where located mutt be given.) Lot 1, Block 4 of Sekich Business Park beina a part of Section 23 . Township 3N Ranae 68W City: r County: States I ZiD Code; Longmont weld Colorado I 80501 4.Mailing Address: (Number and Street) City or Town: State: Zip Code: 4301 Hwy 66 Longmont . . Colorado 1 80501 S. If these premises are now licensed.answer the following: Trade Name of Establishment(0841. I State License No., Type or License: IExpneton One: KEY COLUMN A STATE LOCAL KEY COLUMN B STATE CODE FEES FEES_ _COOE PEES _ + 11^ — 0 Retail 3,2%Beer: rermented Malt $ 46,25 $ 3.75_ 12 0 Wholesale 3.2%Beer License $100.60 Beverage License•City 11 gg Retail 3.2%Beer: Fermented Malt $ 67.50 7.50 13 0 Manufacturer's 3.2%Beer Llcnese 100.00 ' Beverage License•County 76 0 Nonresident Manufacturer or • 100.00 O Other(Specify) Importer License(Fermented Malt (Change of Corporate structure,location,trade Beverage) name.renewal,etc.) Pegs 1 of 4 ,. •... ;.,C. 890371. (continued) I i i i I , .. - yEs NO' 6. Is the applicant;or any of the partners:or officers,stockholders or directors of said applicant(if a corporation); ^ ^ Or manager:under the age of eignteen years? L 7. (a) Has tne applicant;Or My of the prrtnen;or otfioers,stockholders or directors Of said applicant(if a Corporation) ever been Convicted of a crime?If answer is"yes,"explain in detail. (See attached) ran J (b)Hes persons lending assistance or financial support to the applicant;or the manager:or employees:ever been ,�„ convicted of a crime?'4 answer is"yes,"explain in detail, 8. Has the applicant;or any of the partners:or Off icers,directors or stockholders Of said epPaean'lit a corporation): Or manager;ever: la)been denied an alcoholic beverage license? J ^l (0)had en alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? J iG.J (c) had interest In Si'entity trial had en alcoholic Oareraoe aerie*suspended or revoked? 1.-i q-( It answer Is"yes."explain in detail (Attach wont.,sheet i! necessary.) ^' �J 9 Has a fermented malt beverage license for the premises to be licensee been refused within the Preceding one year? :?S.i O-1 10. Does or did the applicant;or any of the partners;Or Officers,directors Or stockholders Of said applicant(if a corporation),have a direct Or indirect interest in any other Colorado LIOUOr or Fermented Malt beverage license(Include loans to or from any licensee,or interest In a n. 'r loan to any licensee)? If answer is "yes,"explain In detail. II. State whether me applicant has legal possession of the premises oy virtue of ownership or under a lease.If leased,list name and address of landlord and term of lease. Property is leased, Landlord is Sekich Equipment Company, for a term of five years starting January 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1993. 12, Identify the persons,firms Of Corporations who now Or will have,a financial interest,evidenced either by loans Or equity Ownership in the business for Which this license is requested.State tne names and addresses,and the amount and source Of such financial interest expressed in dollars or other items of value,such as inventory,furniture or equipment;(l.e.,bank,relatives,friends,previous Owners,etc.).Use separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST (See attached) . List tne names and aggresses of all liquor Pusinesaas in which any Of the Persons In the previous Question are materially Interastad. (Use separate sheet if necessary.) NAME BUSINESS I ADDRESS None I` IAttach eepise of r1 notee end aaaurity inanumane,end any written apharnam a dame a any car Aga.......'by whiOil any pantos 41"of ing■ eorporetion) will Man in the profit a pros prppaada of the enablshment,and any agreement relating to she*ba.rras which a contingent or Con• ditions In rty way by volume,profit,area,giving of Surer isOnsultatton. None 14, Colorado Manufacturer Or Wholesaler app'iants,answer the following: YES NO (a)OOas the applicant own,lease or operate any Colorado warehouse or storage plant in connection with this business? If answer is"yes,"qwe full address:it"n0,"explain in detail. (0)Does the()Ohl'cant have en active surety bond for the Payment Of liquor excise taxes? .— If answer is"yes,"give amount and name and address of insuror;if"no,"explain in dated. — w (c) If the applicant is a wholesaler,does or did any owner,part Owner,shareholder,director or officer nave any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler,retailer,manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado — to sell fermented malt beverages,or malt,vinous or spirituous liquor?it answer is"yes,"attacn exllanatlOn In detail, Id)Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit?If"yes,"attach a copy of the permit;it"no,"explain in detail. Page 2 of 4 ^ 890371 (continued) I8,NonfatidMt MIMWlae mit(fermented malt bev )m Importer(fermented malt beverages)applicant r the fallowmg: IM To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intenC to ship your merchandise? YES NO W) If the sanicant is an importer or manufacturer,does or did any Owner,part owner,shareholder,director or Officer rem any direct of indirect financial interest in an importer,manufacturer,wholesaler or retailer Weedy licensed by the J State of Colorado to sell fermented malt beverages Or melt,vinous or spirituous Ilcuor7 If answer is"yes,"attach explanation In detail. (0)Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit?If"yes,"attach a cosy of the permit;if"no,"explain in detail. rmi_, (a)if the eppbeant is an importer Or Manufacturer,are you the primary source of supply in the VS.? If"n0,"explain in detail. IJ 18. If the auci cant it an individual or partnership,answer the following: (Attach separate snort it necMYry.) (a)Name of individual or name and class Home Address,City and State: One of Birth: '�of each partner: Ibl Name of Operating Manager: Home Address,City and State: Oats of Berth: (c)When did said partnership commence doing business?(Attach a copy of the partnership agreement,except es between husband and wile, and trade name affidavit.) 17. I t the applicant O a corporation,answer the following. Date: Cal COroOranbn it organized unoer the laws of the State of: Colorado N r n '9- 1 q9R (Dl Principal pvaint%is conducted at. I County at. State of: 4301 Hwy 66, Longmont, Co 80501 Weld I Colorado IC) Date of filing alt annual corporate report to the secretary of state; New corporation (less than two years old) Name of each officer lister below: I Home Address.City and State: I Pate of Ginn- Presioent: Conrad Dale HODP 111413 WCR 13, Longmont, CO 80501 17/23/37 Vice'President: gu' n's" Tnhn cekirh Tr Fi74fl wrp 47. TA-me:mon+. CO 20501 4/5/43 Treasurer: 7Lmn 4r+kir}' 67Fb '''rp 19 TnnrxIIlnnt- . rn R0S01 6/12/44 Secretary: Donna Sekich 6401 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 1/9/38 Operating Manager: Conrad Dale Ropo 11413 WCR 13, Longmont, CO 80501 7/23/37 (e) List ll wootholdeN;include actual owner or Hpledgee,(Use separate Sheet if ome Address.City end S necesaN • Name at stockhO del Address. tate: %of rca: I One of firth: (gen .nttar ,nril (el Name of all Director Of Trustees w e of Corporation: Home Address,City and State: I Date of Birth: (See attached) • I I INSTRUCTIONS 1) Check the appropriate box for the type of license(s) being applied for on page 1. If you are applying for a retail license described in Column A,contact the Local Licensing Authority to obtain all local procedures and requirements. — 2) You may attach separate sheets or additional documents if necessary to fully complete this application.Copies may be accepted(other than application) if signatures are evident.All documents must be typewritten or legibly printed in BLACK ink. 3) IMPORTANT: For those retail licenses described in Column A on page 1, this application and all supporting document must FIRST BE FILED IN DUPLICATE WITH AND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. Application will not be accepted unless all appli- cable questions are fully answered, all supporting document correspond exactly with the name of the applicant(s) and proper fees ate attached. 4) Form DRL 404-I,"Individual History Record"must be completed and filed in duplicate by the tollowing: a. Each applicant b. All general partners c. Over 5%limited partners d. All officers and directors of a corporation e. All stockholders of a corporation not subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, f. Over 5%stockholders of a corporation subject to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. g. Operating managers - h. Each person required to file form DRL 404-I must submit fingerprints to Local Licensing Authority. 5) NOTE: License status will not be given over the telephone, License will be mailed to the Local Licensing Authority upon issuance, Per 3of4 - 890371 • OATH OF APPLICANT This application is to be signed by individual,each general partner of partnership and by corporate applicant. 1 declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto. and that I know the contents thereof, and that all matters and information set forth therein are true,correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and information; and I agree to Conform to all applicable statutes and all rules and regulations promulgated by the Colorado Department of Revenue in connection therewith. INDIVIDUALS AND ALL GENERAL PARTNERS OF CORPORATIONS SIGN HERE: PARTNERSHIPS MUST SIGN HERE: r�/ /,.i /lsi..v.,.' /'n',n. (President,Vice Prevent,or Secmaryl-' DATE• DATE: ti REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY {MANUFACTURERS, IMPORTERS,WHOLESALERS DISREGARD THIS SECTION) The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and complies with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46, CRS 1973 as amended. CRS 1973,as amended, 12.46.117 Check One: (1) (a) The local licensing authority shall restrict the use of said license to: (I) Sales for consumption "off" the premises of the licensee;or (II) Sales for consumption "on" the premises of the licensee; or ❑ (III) Sales for consumption "both on and off" the premises of the licensee. ❑ (b) The provisions of paragraph (1) (a) shall not apply to any license issued or applied for under this article prior to July 1, 1967, nor to any renewal or reissuance thereof. THEREFORE THIS • APPLICATION IS HEREBY APPROVED. DATED AT this day of ,A.D.19 AT (Name of Town,City and County) eV: (Mayor.Chairman of Bosco of county commissioners or other title of the naming authority) ATTEST' IClerk,secretary of other officer having the official seer of the licensing authority) • (If the premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk,if in a county, then by the Chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board, If,by ordinance or otherwise,the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by suds official.) Local Licensing Authority report the following pertaining to each person required to file form DRL 404-I: FINGERPRINTED&SUBMITTED BACKGROUND N,C,I,C,&C.C.I.C.CHECKS Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 890371 Nov,of t.. • . OATH OF APPLICANT This application is to be signed by individual, each general partner of partnership and by corporate applicant. I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that I know the contents thereof, and that all matters and information set forth therein are true,correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and information: and I agree to conform to all applicable statutes and all rules and regulations promulgated by the Colorado Department of Revenue in connection therewith. INDIVIDUALS AND ALL GENERAL PARTNERS OF CORPORATIONS SIGN HERE: PARTNERSHIPS MUST SIGN HERE: / %L ii.,. scarf r ern. By r-r-CL_d .. L `tit' (Pmvice Pnsroent,or iv/starer-) DATE: DATE: el0—Or/—f39 REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (MANUFACTURERS. IMPORTERS,WHOLESALERS DISREGARD THIS SECTION) The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and complies with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46, CRS 1973 as amended. CRS 1973,as amended, 12-46-117 Check One: (1) (a) The local licensing authority shall restrict the use of said license to: (I) Sales for consumption "off"the premises of the licensee;or a (I1) Sales for consumption "on" the premises of the licensee; or ❑ (Ill) Sales for consumption "both on and off" the premises of the licensee. ❑ (b) The provisions of paragraph (1) (a) shall not apply to any license issued or applied for under this article prior to July 1, 1967, nor to any renewal or reissuance thereof. THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION IS HEREBY APPROVED, • DATED AT Greeley thin • 26th day Of April ,A.D.lg 89 AT Weld County � n,City and County) airma 'of county mionsn or or".774.(77 n�/► .,of the f authority) ATTEST: eo h) .rl4 ".774.( s (Clerk, ry a other Whose having the oxanyyal of the lC. erg iuth&ityl / (It the premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk,if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If,by ordinance or otherwise,the local licensing authority is some other official,then such approval should be given by such official.) local Licensing Authority report the following pertaining to each person required to file form DRL 404-I: FINGERPRINTED&SUBMITTED BACKGROUND N.C.I.C.&C.C.I.C.CHECKS Yes No ❑ Yes Sr. No 0 890371 Pegs 4 of 4 P 104 454 461 RECL PI FOR Ck WI IF tED MAIL 5�I te eaois T ad 2 when addidorw services ire ds4Wd. sad oanpwts items . yout to the RETURN TO"Spot on MIS 4104.Faun to do Ws will prevent this canew LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION suvr,4-w COLORADO DEPT. OF REVENUE foe eervkwW 1375 SHERMAN STREET { 1. aowMm Ch�+d4det+++44ywds4• 2. 0 strkbGW4ry DENVER, CO 80261 ]( I.LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION ? !a7 , COLORADO DEPT. OF REVENUE ! J t O ben, ,, •r ,� 1375 RJHERMAN STREET 26 RE,. " ►�: QO M t ., ' DENVER, CO 80261 r ... � , , n , r ATr ohbin rpnat. a 4 q.. dd>w RE S 1"11ya'"0 DATE DEMME . u en a. $IgneSe —wdaess 111 Rr' a. Addrestft Address lcNZr y ' X — �� 1, 1` Pt" q A J Dee 1 iY J z Signature Roane REVS %OLO�pp U 7..Date of Deliver : J UTAL l t,l ,t5 s Fort sail,Mu.,na * uaaa.o. +aa-212-sea DOMESTIC REIMS.RECEIPT y/�� LL N s S 7(a ) . Donna Sekich , a corporate officer, stockholder and director pled nolo contendre to a charge of conspiracy to commit theft and was was fined $7 , 500 . 00 by the District Court of Weld County in 1974. 890371 • • - 12. NAME AND ADDRESS INTEREST Frederick Michael Sekich Paid $5 ,000.00 for stock 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont , CO 80501 Donna Lea Sekich Paid $5,000.00 for stock 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont , CO 80501 Nicholas John Sekich, Jr. Paid $5,000.00 for stock 5769 WCR 32 Longmont , CO 80501 Karen Sue Sekich ?aid $5, 000.00 for stock 6769 WCR 32 Longmont, CO 80501 Conrad Dale Hopp Paid $5 , 000.00 for stock 11413 WCR 13 Longmont , CO 80501 Martha Ann Hopp Paid $5 ,000.00 for stock 11413 WCR 13 Longmont , CO 80501 Loan in the amount of $50 , 000 . 00 with First Bank North of Longmont . This loan is secured by a Deed of Trust upon the real property. 890371 17. (e) NAME AND ADDRESS % OF STOCK DATE OF BIRTH Frederick Michael Sekich 16.66% June 30, 1936 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Donna Lea Sekich 16.66% January 9, 1938 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont , CO 80501 Nicholas John Sekich, Jr. 16.66% April 5, 1943 5769 WCR 32 Longmont , CO 80501 Karen Sue Sekich 16.66% June 12, 1944 6769 WCR 32 Longmont, CO 80501 Conrad Dale Hopp 16.66% July 23, 1937 11413 WCR 13 Longmont , CO 80501 Martha Ann Hopp 16.66% February 2, 1938 11413 WCR 13 Longmont, CO 80501 - 890371 • • 17. (f) NAME AND ADDRESS DATE OF BIRTH Frederick Michael Sekich June 30 , 1936 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont , CO 80501 Donna Lea Sekich January 9, 1938 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Nicholas John Sekich, Jr. April 5 , 1943 6769 WCR 32 Longmont , CO 80501 Karen Sue Sekich June 12, 1944 6769 WCR 32 Longmont , CO 80501 Conrad Dale Hopp July 23 , 1937 11413 WCR 13 Longmont, CO 80501 Martha Ann Hopp February 2, 1938 11413 WCR 13 Longmont , CO 80501 • • LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this S/ day of "2,►DOPre , 19KF, by and between eel. /r'// .� !,.'ice ,,� , hereinafter referred to as LANDLORD, and 4Cr.terra' 7-4. r . , hereinafter referred to as'TENANT, - WITNESSETH: THAT, ' WHEREAS, LANDLORD owns a certain parcel of real property in • Weld County, Colorado (more particularly described in Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference) , which he wishes to lease upon the following terms and conditions, and, WHEREAS, TENANT desires to lease said real property from LANDLORD upon the following terms and conditions; NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and agreements contained hereafter, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Premier. LANDLORD hereby leases to TENANT the property described in EXHIBIT A. 2. Term. This Lease shall commence on the / day of �G Nino , 19=9, and continue for a term o£ years until the .Y • day of />e?"--n'. f--,P , 192. 3. Rental pmonnts,. In consideration for the lease of the premises, TENANT shall pay to LANDLORD the sum of $ .35, .—e° , hereinafter referred to as the base rental, as refj,.ected in the • • attached EXHIBIT A, commencing on the 1st day of -d a'l'4e, ta'r, 194 .' . All rental payments shall be due and payable on the 1st day of each month. Any payments not made by the / day of each month shall cause a penalty of $ <°'e to be imposed which shall be payable when the rent for that month in which the fr... ,::' penalty is imposed is paid. If the lease term should commence on t? a day other than the 1st day of the month, the first and last : ' ` months rent shall be prorated. A. Set Rent Provision. It is the intention of the LANDLORD and TENANT that the rent specified shall be net to the :1,-;.,,.;."LANDLORD in each year during the term of this lease, that all costs, expenses and obligations of every kind relating to the leased property (except as otherwise specifically provided in this lease) which may arise or become due during the term of this lease shall be paid by the TENANT, and that the LANDLORD shall be indemnified by the TENANT against such costs, expenses, and obligations. The TENANT shall, however, be under no obligation to pay interest on any mortgage on the fee of the leased property, and franchise or income tax payable by the LANDLORD, or t --�� 890371 • • any gift, inheritance, transfer, estate, or succession tax by reason of any present or future Saw which may be enacted during the term of this lease. B. Rant "Adjustment. For each year after the initial leas year, the rental amount snail be increased by 4. 7.Axnr,ORn'S, Obligations. A. Qyjet ynjoyment. For so long as TENANT pays the rent • required hereunder and fulfills the obligations hereunder, LANDLORD warrants that TENANT shall peaceably hold and quietly enjoy the leased property without interruption by the LANDLORD, the mortgagee(s) , or any other person, firm or corporation claiming under them, and LANDLORD agrees to save and hold TENANT harmless from any damages, losses, or costs incurred including reasonable attorney's fees, as a result of breach of this warranty. B. pelyyery !L£ PflqqAcei M. LANDLORD shall. deliver possession of the leased premises on the / day of I !"'1 •tee',', 19 , upon tender of the first month's rent. C. Taxes. LANDLORD agrees to pay the pro rata share of 192Z, real property taxes, based on the 19ZZ assessment, up to the date of this lease, and its prorated share for the period subsequent to the lease term. 5. TENANT's Obligations. A. Maintenance. TENANT agrees to maintain the entire premises in good repair during the term of the lease and to keep the condition of the property in conformance with the law. B. Twee. Except for the LANDLORD'S obligation for taxes as previously stated, TENANT 'shall pay all taxes assessed against leased property. C. Insurance. During the term of this Lease, TENANT shall have and maintain general ,liability insurance ' in the .. following amounts: -. 500,000/1,000 ,000 : . Bodily Injury 100 ,000 .. Property Damage Said policy or policies shall name LANDLORD and TENANT as co— " ' ' insureds. A copy shall be provided to LANDLORD on request. • .e._. D. Otilitiet. TENANT agrees to pay all utilities which may be furnished to the premises and to keep the premises free and clear of any lien for utilities arising from TENANT'S use of the premises. �. : _ 2 890371 • Zr:12Z2Y�m��• No alteration, addition, or ^oro� to the leased property shall be made cy the TENANT vithou'. . e written consent of the LANDLORD. Any alteration, additi•: , or improvement made by the TENANT after such consent shall c'e been given, and any fixtures installed as part thereon ; ;hall at the LANDLORD'S option become the property of the LAM; ,•;RD upon expiration cr other sooner termination of this Lease; avided, however, that the LANDLORD shall have the right to requ. . ;e the TENANT to remove such fixtures at the TENANT'S cost upc.0 such termination of this Lease. TENANT agrees to keep the premises free from any and all liens arising out of any work performed, materials furnished, or obligations incurred by TENANT. In the event TENANT fails to pay for materials furnished or labor performed when cue and a lien is placed against the property, LANDLORD may, at his option, pay said amounts which shall be due and payable by the TENANT on the first day of the month after payment by the LANDLORD. Failure by the TENANT to pay such sums to LANDLORD shall be treated as default in the payment of rent. F. pas. , n-Am+ g0q. TENANT agrees to use the premises for any lawful purpose and shall not use the premises for any purpose in violation of any law or ordinance. G. q„r,.p.,,4ar S«: o.omc cast At the expiration of the original lease term or any extension thereof, TENANT shall quit end surrender said premise in good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted; any fixtures and structural additions to the property shall be left in place and shall become the property of the LANDLORD, if LANDLORD elects. In the event the TENANT remains in possession of the • leased property after the expiration of either the original term of this lease or any extension term, if any, such possession shall be as a month-to-month tenant. During such month-to-month tenancy, rent shall be payable at the rate 150% as that in effect during the last month of the preceding term and all other provisions of this Lease shall be applicable. 6. E ig ' TENANT"-`' shall not assign this se. nmPnt �t'. .c1.h.�- -^a• t; Lease or any interest herein without obtaining the prior written consent of the LANDLORD. TENANT shall not have the right to • sublease portions of the premises to any sublessee without the prior written consent cf the LPNDLORD. • . 7. ppfnn1t. The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute an event of default: (1) Delinquency in the due and punctual payment of any rent or additional rent payable under - this lease when such rent shall become payable, for a period of three days after written notice. (2) Delinquency by the Tenant in the performance of or compliance with any of the conditions contained in this Lease other than those referred to in the foregoing subparagraph (1) , for a period of thirty days after written notice thereof from the LANDLORD to the TENANT, except for any default not susceptible of being cured within such thirty 3 890371 _ . • • • day period, in which event the time permitted to the TENANT to cure such default shall be extended for as long as shall be necessary to cure such default, provided the TENANT commences promptly and proceeds diligently to cure such default, and provided furtner that such period of time shall not be so extended as to jeopardize the interest of the LANDLORD in this lease or so as to subject the LANDLORD or the TENANT to any civil or criminal liabilities. (3) Filing by the TENANT in any court pursuant to any statute, either of the United States or any state, of a petition in bankruptcy or insolvency, or for reorganization, or for the appointment of a receiver or trustee • of all or a portion of the TENANT'S property, or an assignment by the TENANT for the benefit of creditors. (4) Filing against the TENANT in any court pursuant to any statute, either of the United States or of any state► of a petition in bankruptcy or insolvency, or for reorganization, or for appointment of a receiver or trustee of all or a portion of the TENANT'S property, if within ninety dhys after the commencement of any such proceeding against the TENANT such petition shall have not have been dismissed. • Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the LANDLORD at any time thereafter may give written notice to the TENANT specifying such event of default and stating that this lease shall expire on the date specified in such notice, which shall be at least three days after the giving of such notice, and upon the date specified in such notice this lease and all rights of the TENANT shall terminate. Upon the expiration of this Lease pursuant to this article, the TENANT shall peacefully surrender the leased property to the LANDLORD, and the LANDLORD, upon or at any time after any such expiration, may without further notice reenter the leased property and repossess it by force, summary proceedings, ejectment, or otherwise, and may dispossess the TENANT and remove the TENANT and all other persons and property from the leased property and may have, hold, and enjoy the leased property and the right to receive all rental income therefrom. At any time after any such expiration, the LANDLORD may relet the leased property or any party thereof, in the name of • the LANDLORD or otherwise, for such term (which may be greater or ~-• less than the period which would otherwise have constituted the balance of the term of this lease) and on such conditions (which • may include concessions or free rent) as the LANDLORD, in its "" uncontrolled discretion, may determine, and may collect and receive the rent therefor. The LANDLORD shall take reasonable • steps to release the property and to collect any rent due upon -,••••,..; any such reletting. . .; w_.. -- No such expiration of this lease shall relieve the TENANT of its liability and obligations under this lease, and • such liability and obligations shall survive any such expiration. • In the event of any such expiration, whether or not the leased property or any part thereof shall have been relet, the Tenant shall pay to the LANDLORD the rent and additional rent required to be paid by the TENANT up to the time of such expiration, and 4 890371 • • • thereafter the TENANT, until the end of which would have been the term of this lease in the absence of such expiration, shall be liable to the Landlord for, and shall pay to the LANDLORD, as and for liquidated and agreed current damages for the TENANT's default: (1) • The equivalent of the amount of the rent and additional rent which would be payable under this lease by the TENANT if this lease were still in effect, less (2) The net proceeds of any reletting effected pursuant to the provisions of paragraph B of this article, after deducting all the LANDLORD'S expenses in connection with such reletting, including, without limitation, all repossession costs, brokerage commissions, legal • expenses, reasonable attorney's fees, alteration costs, and expenses of preparation of such reletting. The TENANT shall pay such current damages, herein called deficiency, to the LANDLORD monthly on the days on which the rent and additional rent would have been payable under this lease if this lease were still in effect, and the LANDLORD shall be entitled to recover from the TENANT, and the TENANT shall pay to the LANDLORD, on demand, as and for liquidated and agreed final damages for the TENANT'S default, an amount equal to the difference between the rent and additional rent reserved hereunder for the unexpired portion of the lease term and the then fair and reasonable rental value of the leased property for the same period. In the computation of such damages the difference between any installment of rent becoming due hereunder after the date of termination and the fair and reasonable rental value of the leased property for the period for which such installment was payable shall be discounted to the date of termination at the rate of four percent per annum. If the leased property or any part thereof is relet by the LANDLORD for the unexpired term of this lease, or any part thereof, before presentation of proof of such liquidated damages to any court, commission, or tribunal , the amount of rent reserved upon such ' reletting shall be deemed prima facie to be the fair and reasonable rental value for the part or the whole of the lease property so relet curing the term of the reletting. Nothing herein contained shall limit or prejudice the right of the LANDLORD to prove for and obtain as liquidated damages by reason of such termination an amount equal to the maximum allowed by any statute or rule of law in effect at the time when, and governing ' the proceedings in which, such damages are to be proved, whether or not such amount be greater, equal to, or less than the amount of the difference referred to above. The TENANT hereby expressly waives,` so far as permitted by law, the service of any notice of intention to reenter provided for in any statute, • or of the institution of legal ' • proceedings to that end. The TENANT, for and on behalf of itself and all persons claiming through or under the TENANT, also waives any right of redemption or reentry or repossession or to restore the operation of this lease in case the TENANT shall be dispossessed by a judgment or by warrant of any court or judge or in case of reentry or repossession by the LANDLORD. In case of any litigation under this lease, the LANDLORD and the TENANT, so 5 890371 • • far as permitted by law, waive trial by jury in any action, proceeding, or counterclaim brought by either of the parties hereto against the other on any matter arising out of or in any way connected with this lease, the relationship of landlord and tenant, the TENANT'S use or occupancy of the leased property, or any claim of injury or damage; and further agree that the party not in default shall be entitled to recover, from the party in default, all costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the nondefaulting party in enforcing its rights under this lease agreement. _ • The terms "enter", 'reenter", "entry', or 'reentry", as used in this lease are not restricted to their technical legal meaning. Any amounts not paid by TENANT to LANDLORD when due shall draw interest at the rate of eighteen percent per annum from due date until paid. Payment of such interest shall not excuse or cure any default by Tenant under this lease. No assent, express or implied, to any breach of one or more of the covenants or terms of this lease shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any succeeding or other breach. As security for TENANT'S payment of all rent, damages, and all other payments required to be made by this lease agreement, TENANT hereby grants to LANDLORD a lien upon all property of TENANT on or subsequently located upon the leased premises. If TENANT abandons or vacates any substantial portion of the leased premises or is in default in the payment of any rentals, damage, or other payments required to be paid by this lease, LANDLORD may enter upon the leased premises, by force if necessary, and take possession of all or any part of the personal property, and may sell all or any part of the personal property at a public or private sale, in one or successive sales, with or without notice, to the highest bidder for cash and, on behalf of TENANT, sell and convey all or a part of the personal property to ' the highest bidder, all of TENANT'S title and interest in the personal property sold. The proceeds of any such sale of • personal property shall be applied by LANDLORD toward the cost of the sale and then toward the payment of all sum then due by ` TENANT to LANDLORD under the terms of this lease. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, LANDLORD'S liability under this lease agreement shall be limited to LANDLORD'S interest in the leased -premises. ` ' „"' 8. Nell-waiver of Default. The subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by the LANDLORD shall not be deemed a waiver of any preceding breach of any obligation hereunder by the TENANT other than the failure to pay the particular rental so accepted, and the waiver of any breach of any covenant or condition by the LANDLORD shall not constitute a waiver of any other breach regardless of knowledge thereof. 890371 6 9. Frj-ry mist T; pectioa. The TENANT shall permit LANDLORD and his agents to enter the demised premises at all reasonable times for any of the following purposes: To inspect the same; to make such repairs to the demised premises as the LANDLORD is obligated or. may elect to make ; to post notices of nonresponsibility for alterations or aoditions or repairs. 10. Condemnat+9r1. If the whole of the premises hereby demised shall be taken or condemned by any competent authority for any public use or purpose, then the term hereby granted shall cease on the day prior to the taking of possession by such authority, whichever first occurs, and rent hereunder shall be paid to and adjusted as of that day. If a portion of said demised premises shall be condemned or taken and, as a result thereof, there snail be such a major change in tne character of the premises as to prevent TENANT from using the same in substantially the same manner as theretofore used, then and in that event, the TENANT may either cancel and terminate this Lease, as of the date when the part of the premises so taken or condemned shall be required for such public purpose, or said TENANT may continue to occupy the remaining portion, provided, however, the TENANT shall give written notice to the LANDLORD, within fifteen (15) days after the date of any taking or vesting of title, of its election. In the event the TENANT remains in possession and occupation of the remaining portion, all the terms and conditions of this Lease shall remain in full force and effect with respect to such remaining portion, except that the rent reserved to be paid hereunder shall be equitably adjusted according to tne footage of such remaining space. The entire award of damages or compensation for the premises taken, or the amount paid pursuant to private purchase in lieu thereof, whether such condemnation or sale be total or partial, shall belong to and be the property of the LANDLORD and the TENANT hereby assigns to LANDLORD any and all such award or purchase price. Nothing herein contained stall be deemed or construed to prevent TENANT from interposing and prosecuting in any condemnation proceeding a claim for the value of any trade fixtures installed in the demised premises by the TENANT and in • the case of a partial condemnation of the demised premises, the cost, loss, or damages sustained by TENANT as the result of any alterations, moditications, or repairs which may be reasonably required by the TENANT in order to place the remaining portion of the demised premises not so condemned in a suitable condition for TENANT'S further occupancy. - .. .�.:.• .. .......nvrrv•. ..n.. ..,,.-u.. M•r;:>� _ .�.:.'. ..i.l- J +a;ro Y:rr"n ..F;. • 11. fl structioa Qf the Prer iec,. In the event of a total or partial destruction of the said premises during said term from any cause, the LANDLORD shall forthwith repair the same, provided such repairs can be made within 180 days under the laws and regulations of state, federal, county or municipal authorities, but such partial destruction shall in no way annul or void this Lease. However , if any laws or regulations prohibit _ 890371 . • reconstruction after partial destruction, this obligation of LANDLORD snail be void. Should the total or partial destruction result from causes covered by the. lire and extended coverage insurance furnished by the LANDLORD, the insurance proceeds shall be applied to effect the required repairs. If such repairs cannot be made within 180 days, this Lease may be terminated at the option of either party. • LANDLORD shall not be responsible for any losses or damages incurred by TENANT as a result of damage to or destruction of the premises by any hazard which results in termination of the lease. 12. At2xnsiomment. The TENANT agrees not to vacate or abandon the premises at any time during the demised term. Should the TENANT vacate or abandon said premises or be dispossessed by process of law or otherwise, such abandonment, vacation, or dispossession shall be a breach of this Lease and, in addition to any other rights which the LANDLORD may have, the LANDLORD may remove any personal property belonging to the TENANT which remains on the demised premises and store the same, such removal and storage to be for the account of the TENANT. Upon such abandonment, LANDLORD may, at his option, without terminating this lease take possession of the premises and relet the premises in whole or in part in LANDLORD'S name as agent for TENANT for all or any part of the remainder of the lease, to collect rents and to use any rents so collected first, to reimburse the LANDLORD for any expenses incurred in repossessing the premises and second to apply such sums on account for TENANT. TENANT shall remain liable for any deficiency which may result if the rents collected are not sufficient to pay the amounts owed by LANDLORD hereunder; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that LANDLORD shall be obligated to take reasonable steps to mitigate damages by attempting to relet the premises. 13 . Inan1Y.nn:z. If any proceedings in bankruptcy or insolvency be tiled against the TENANT or if any writ of attachment or writ of execution be levied upon the interest ...�.; herein of* the TENANT and such proceedings or levy shall not be released or dismissed within 60 days thereafter or if any sale of • • the leasehold interest hereby created or any part thereof should be made under any execution or other judicial process, or if the TENANT shall make any- assignment for benefit of creditors or .� , . shall voluntarily institute bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, the LANDLORD, at LANDLORD'S election, may re—enter and take possession of said premises and remove all persons therefrom and may, at LANDLORD'S option, terminate this lease. 14. Attorney's ,gigs. In the event of any litigation between the parties hereto arising out of this Lease, or the leased premises, the prevailing party therein shall be allowed all 890371 ) 8 o • real attorney's fees expended or incurred in such ----liti: ;:o be recovered as a part of the costs therein. 1'i. -*dilution. The TENANT agrees that this Lease shall be subord' a to any mortgages or trust deeds that may hereafter be placec 'on the premises by LANDLORD, to the interest and all oblige s secured by them, and to ail renewals, replacements and ex:: ions of them; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the mortgagee or • benefit :y named in any such mortgages or trust deeas shall recogni:. : '..he lease of the TENANT in the event of foreclosure if the TEN. , is not in default under the terms of •this Lease. If any mor:r •r;Tae or beneficiary elects to have this Lease superior in its mortgage or deed of trust and gives notice of its election to TENANT then this Lease shall be superior to the lien of any mortgage c trust deed whether tnis lease is dated or recorded before or A.rter the mortgage or trust deed. 16. Fits tionshiq Szf part4as. It is understood and agreed that the relationship of the parties hereto is strictly that of landlord and tenant and that tnis Lease shall not be construed as a joint venture or partnership. The TENANT is not and shall not be deemed to be agent or representative of the LANDLORD. 17. persona], property. The TENANT shall have the right to remove same at the termination of this lease provided it is not a fixture and may be removed without damage to the structure. Any property remaining on the premises after the termination of this lease shall be deemed abandoned as of the date of termination. LANDLORD shall have a landlord's lien upon all personal property of the TENANT as security for any default by TENANT subject to all of the rights, duties and obligations as provided by C.R.S. 38-20-101 et. seq. (1973) as amended. • 18. Iii sell aneons. • (a) . The paragraph captions in the lease are for convenience only and shall not in any way limit or be deemed to construe or interpret the terms and provisions hereof. • (b) . Time is of the essence of this lease and of all • provisions hereof, except in respect to the delivery of -• possession of the demised premises at the commencement of the term hereof. :__ ._. . • (c) . This lease shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. - •• 19. Notices. Ndtices required by this agreement shall be addressed and delivered to the LANDLORD at an address to be provided to the TENANT, and vice versa. • 20. peraLt v DDeoosi.t. The TENANT has deposited with the LANDLORD the sum of $ ,' as security for the full and • faithful performance by the TENANT of all of the terms of this 9 890371 • • lease required to be performed by the TENANT. Such sum shall be _. returned to the TENANT after the expiration of this lease, provided the TENANT has fully and faithfully carried out all of its terms. Otherwise, the LANDLORD may use, apply, or retain the whole or any part of such amount to the extent required for the payment of any rent or other obligation as to which the TENANT is in default under the terms of this lease. In such event TENANT shall upon written demand from LANDLORD, forthwith remit to LANDLORD a sufficient amount in cash to restore such deposit to its original amount. LANDLORD shall have the right to transfer such security to the purchaser to be held under the terms of this lease, and the LANDLORD shall thereupon be released from all liability for the return of such security to the TENANT, and the TENANT shall look solely to the new landlord for the return of such security. The TENANT shall not assign nor encumber the money deposited as security, and neither the LANDLORD nor its successors or assigns shall be bound by any such assignment or encumbrance. Upon the faithful performance of TENANT'S • obligations, the deposit shall be refunded within 60 days of the termination of this lease. 21. $nrOe sort. All the terms, covenants, and conditions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LANDLORp and TENANT have executed this lease this 31 day of r>/+,r h•cP , 19 OQ . LANDLORD: TENANT• ?.41-4 44 it, • :• 10 890371 ® • EXHIBIT "A" Property described as follows: The South 200.6 feet of Lot 1 , Block u of Replat "A" of Sekich Business Park, being a part of' the Southwest Quarter ( SWi ) of Section Twenty-three (23) , Township Three (3) North, Range Sixty-eight (68 ) West of the 6th P . M. , Weld County , Colorado , according to the Planned Unit Development Replat and approved Site Plan subject , however, to all easements , exits , entrances , display areas , landscaping, traffic control devices, highway reservations and public traffic and parking spaces as shown upon said Site Plan. • 890371 a .. • _ _ + r . ••rY, dRN2vbao B 0994 REC 01924600 04/26/03 10'2. $3.00 1,/001 i 1330 MARY ANN FEUERSTESN CLERK 6 RECORDER VEL..D CO. CO Kenya. • j; Mrs Dt:g0.Mode the* 20th Age April ,SaOJ ..-- --- - ' - 1 • d 6n...n SCKICN FARMS. • General Partnership ' MUM25Y11 I arm • at l NC • ', Genty.t Weld eM•IM.alCabed.,of the find part,and Store Docuaxnre F., 'i ate II SEXICM EQUIPMENT CO., a Colorado Corporation APR qL lyify m j eh...*hal sidles.. PO Box 500. i.Ongennt, Colorado 60501 et,. - N.XO '� S 13.01.17 1, -, . I, elk* Cenral,el Veld andrta*.f -- '' • - I. Calwi,etthe .r. and part. 1 2! I, .TTIEx4CTN.Thal In.said pall y .tint firs,pall,lei and Inpannd.r.tlen of Other good and valu.bl.4 el • , consideration and the aull of Yen and No/I00 (Sl0.00)-ea.-..-e.---------r'WILLA MN g o ti the laid part Y w1 the foal no In hand wed by and pan y .1 the moan part,the lefties.heralof,, A O heP.bprel frsN and r e n.rledrnd.no ranted,kw d Manr e.,n ,laid arryed,and by t new/t.wM.dales ee la , pawl,a.rpati,sell,rainy awl~fa, .M.the uId pan] d rM twewl pail,It.he,,.aM ar*nrnt In. m 7 • en,.all t he fdb•,we dernted lel .a panel .Ilan,ear.,. lying and Sing in the j. Ca,nt..t Weld and Mae al Cater.wn.•d N. e)04 , r u. • All of Blocks I. 2 and 1 and Late I, 2, 3 and 4, !^ Block 4, Sekich Brouwer Park. a portion of the ' >z SV11 of Section 23, Township I Marth, Range 68 Kest of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado o ��' ; Tn In w Au A$ TOCCTMLMwan au and•••••••••the lardn.benl..pad app heWnpne.e,In W.W.I*,nicer. O — 111110.1.end.k M tea..Mn anal..wander*,rent....,..end profite thermal,and all tn. O Q. .guns nett,mM.ut.r.acoat.and 41•,..M.na,r,...I IA..W pan y ..I the r.e.,p.n.nln.r.n)r..r Q "knit.a,..n an .b • ned r•.a•.e' span on lnr..Ll.t..nu aw.l ; no TO Nate. all YID lan1.0 en...xl r....... .... •.,.anal...a awn rawn raw 11.0 la-ante....In Ile • ▪aid party sat Inv send part, (Cc lama and swear 1, Ana IM.ad N. y al Oa n pant, r ltr M l f,St/ ,n,qwu .pad Mnnnll.l.la 0. es ...ninon,. m•rn.n1.dr. , In.end I..M ills Ins..,4 s.."7 mint wand p.rl. I t• hair*and.upn I hal.1 l he bw.er she enr.lne and iL,gy 'finnywant., 1C le eellsen lh e4ete evenings a e t ag ..,d mean.. areal.waft.M fe n.L.k..lute and I .wd.M1r,kl...ta.al in he M an nals. n la,•w re and he• rat nth..kill meet sad set Oman. - I.grant kersain,.all and entst•t the new,w...w*r and ler.as a4t..aN.oho that it..sane are free and titer II fret.11 Irrn.,end nt net anal,ka. 'a. fib liana,n.., la, 1.e* n enbn. L l MM •and. . a ..aOn ..r .1 '.setter....,., Excepting therefrom: I. 1901 t due and payable In 1964; 2. any and re.ervatlons liaftatione conditions and exceptions contained in tact it• of record M in n.any ray relate to or burden the above Described premisesrt; oil "t), ;and sae 1 record; A. any and•al,l reservation,, protect Ova 'u.enant., Il - .cations, condition, and exceptions cnntatnnd in instruments of retard which in any vat relate to or burden the above described premises; and S. protective covenants of record. and Inn s.,n nnl pie s...._,nik.pan.,and pen raak pesse..n.nulthe an,.pe t y oft he Won..part. •. its he„saun a.yP.YUM1.11 eMaea.,1a•um hrpan,.w.lap ,llt•leieet fir to claw l he.Ml.e.an,g.,. thermal,Da..,4 part y aln.l.•I peel.n.11and edl r'AMMAST Al'\ rt1MC\'YN Oki END ,. it.rIY\r%>rIEMI:.., see sand pan y oath.List pal ha, here tenth wrI its hand MA seal to clap and p...lue e•••••••.110. BY dreQ PI /,e./d..1 Int:AL. ,AEAl., .:,...„.•„ ••..„,....., 1. •-wwl al Weld TM la.r.ne n,l.P-mar...eskn..le.lrnl Irk.,,use in,, 26th dal,wf April Ise 63 .i. Fred M. Schick as a partner of Schick Yana, a general partnerahlp. - . Xl""..lay n'••Y•n • May 26 In 16 r.1....Nip band mot.dMol*al _ A, j.r % 1^f .ti 1gM. 46 r i1'�TL4Y••.:•'\, Addre.. 670 Greeley Natl. Plaza — _. a•• i ♦ rot Creel•,. CO eWtl _ _ _ . 1 N �` e ; Thu deed I. bete' recorded co verify that Fred M. Sekich .`. 1. 3 6 ,• �. / executed ease ale • partner in the general partnership y0!•p-;";c:,i Sekich Parma. ' Pan*,lea.a.s n DO XL—far np+esinev a. •+..rain.,•nout a. tan...akimbo. 'r..III r.... -4. - . 890371 �.O ' r Ira' I h - ro • v ♦ I , r, \ \ N /' / •� •� • / , Al rz • ./ I . li �..\7. {//////��J .�Jt• / <79t Y YYY I { � n ! ,/ I Li • yt , rnl. • • " / : Li. < / J: pi PI:. t1 / \y^ \Y /RE -JO)4/ ,. v N.\ .42 890371 • • EQUIPMENT LIST 1 . Tidel TACC - II SASE 2. Checkout Counter 3. Fast Food Counter 4. Cal Plastics Bakery Case 5. Star i115a 175 CB Hot Dogger 6 . Server 87620 Chili Dispenser 7. Server 81660 Nacho Cheese Dispenser 8. Nacho Chip Rack 9. Microwave Oven 10. Hussmann LBF-6 Lo-boy Freezer 11 . Masterbilt CC 6 Sandwich Display 12. Jet Spray Model PHC -1 Hot Chocolate Machine 13. Coffee Maker 14. Jet Spray J7-20 Beverage Dispenser 15. Servend K-23 Ice Dispenser 16 . Soda Fountain 17. Chilly-Willie Slush Machine 18. 3 Compartment Sink 19. Amro II Storage Shelving 20. Imperial VF-30L Storage Freezer 21 . Hussmann Condiment Bail 22. Display Shelving 23. Imperial Walk-in Cooler 24. Anthony Display Doors 301 x 73" 25. Video Display 26. Hussmann UML-2Bs Display Freezer 27. Ice Merchandise 28. Plymold Booths 890371 .29.- Ptyrtold Trash Container AFFIDAVIT OF FUNDS STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD // ) I , -at lfh/i nn �rn/� , an officer and shareholder of The Furrow o N,rporation (aoblicant ) state that the source of all funds invested are identified in Paragraph 12 of the application being $30,000.00 from shareholders for the purchase of stock and $50 , 000 . 00 from First Bank North of Longmont. There are no other loans or investors other than the shareholders and the loan from First Bank North. rhel i 79.•c i (� : • - JCL .p.C2/ /) Subscribed and sworn to before me this %t/VA day of February, 1989 by t/21 'h4 4nn Flnr' Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: MY CarnmirAort 5V(cas Auoust 22, 1991 Notary blic /% "slI" 890371 • • • PROMISSORY NOTE (Cfllercial Purpose—Fixed or Variable Rat* 0 Single advance 0 Installment 0 Installment with Balloon 0 Construction tJ line of Credit Primary Master Number I Loan Number Officer Loan Amount Note Dale Maluury Dale MRlrk 150.000-On 01/76(89 k11/26/90 Borrower(s):Name,Address,Zip Code FirstBankl Name.Address,Zip Code THE FURROW CORPORATION C+ FirstBank of North Longmont, N.A. 4301 Highway 66 1707 North Main Street Longmont, Colorado 80501 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Payment Schedule: 4m nr befara-01426J90-with Interest: --quaztarly—Sntersst-due-04/26184,—OZL26189, 0 Fixedgateol . —and-4046/89 ® Variable Raie—FestBank Commercial Base Rate plus 1•B x Collateral: --.?n4-DOT-Lot-1,--Block-4, REPEAT-1A!' I)metal VariatweRale is 17.0l4 oecSekich_DBBIther_a ck untyxdiinRRtt . 1<he • recorded plat thereof, Gounty ot Wild, _o,.-. ,. .. n,,,...a..- — _ ❑ [Aber 0 If chocked,this note is intended to provide for © If checked,this note is intended to provide a revolving tine of credit available to Borrower in sums up to the Loan future advances, PirstBank commits to loan Bpi- Amount shown above, The unpaid balance under this line of crodn may be reduced or repaid in lull at any time by rower up to the'Loan Amount shown above as long Borrower and may subsequently be readvanced at any time prior to maturity Borrower may obtain advances under this as Borrower is not in default under this note or any note upon notice to FirstBank,but the unpaid balance existing at any time may not exceed the Loan Amount shown other agreement between FirstBank and Borrower. above plus accrued interest.FirseBank commits to loan Borrower from time to time up to the Loan Amount shown above as tong as Borrower is not in default under this note or any other agreement between FirstBank and Borrower. PROMISE TO PAY For value received,the undersigned(referred to throughout as'Borrower)jointly and severally promises to pay to the order of FirstBank at its address shown above the Loan Amount in the manner described in the payment schedule along with interest at the rate described above on the unpaid balance from the note date until paid in lull.All payments shall be applied first to fees due,then accrued interest,and then to unpaid principal in the manner determined by Firsl3ank,The final payment due upon maturity shall be equal to the outstanding principal balance,accrued interest and any unpaid tees and other charges.Any unpaid balance may be paid in part or in lull at any time without penalty.Any prepayment shall not excuse any subsequent periodic payment which may be due as provided above.If this note is payable in Installments,a delinquency charge of 5 percent will be imposed on the amount of any installment more than 10 days past due.Alter default or maturity,whether by acceleration or otherwise.all sums due under this note shall be subject to post•maturrty interest at a fixed rate ot 36 percent per annum until paid in furl.No interest shall accrue hereunder in excess of the maximum rate permitted by law. INTEREST The interest rate on this loan is described above.Interest will be computed by dividing the stated interest rate by 360 and multiplying the quotient by the actual number of days elapsed during the term of the loan.II the variable rate bo i ch ed,interest will be imposed at a variable rate ol interest equal to the FirstBank Commercial Base Rate plus the percentage cat•.e .• ' " . k Commercial Base Rate is subject to change on the first business day of each month,The variable rate will change corms tSThr�g twit 1 ".d• nges in the FirstBank Commercial Base Rate.Interest shalt accrue from the date Of any advance under this note. fI(�pCC'.�aQQ.- SECURITY AGREEMENT As security for this note,Borrower Of Pi - -ink security interest in the Collateral described above.II some or alkaline Collateral consists of real estate,Borrower agrees to execute a separate deed of trust encumbering the real estate in favor of FirstBank.Borrower covenants and represents that Borrower:(a)owns and will continue to own tree Collateral free from any other encumbrances or claims;(b)will defend the Collateral against any claim or demand of any third party;(e)will promptly pay all taxes,assessments and other charges imposed against the Collateral;(d)will keep the Collateral insured against loss or damage (including collision and comprehensive coverage in the Case of motor vehicles)to the extent required by FirstBank;(0)will keep the Collateral in good repair and Condition:and(I)will not sell,transfer or encumber the Collateral without the written consent of FirstBank.If Borrower fads to comply with any of these covenants,FirstBank may make discretionary advances to perform such covenants.The amount of any advance shall be added to principal and bear interest at the applicable rate in this note. A default by Borrower under this note,under any document executed in connection with this note or under any other document evidencing an obligation of Borrower to any subsidiary bank of FirstBank Holding Company of Colorado(collectively the"Obligations")shall be deemed an event of default.Upon the occurrence 01 any event of default,First6ank may exercise its rights and remedies as a secured creditor under Colorado law to obtain possession of the Collateral and sell it at public or private sale.The net proceeds of the sale,alter payment of all expenses of sale,shall be applied against me Obligations in the manner chosen by FirstBank.Borrower will continue to be liable for any deficiency amounts which remain owing upon the Obligations. The Collateral shall secure all other present and future indebtedness of Borrower to any subsidiary bank of FirstBank Holding Company of Colorado.except that this provision shall not apply to Borrower's principal dwelling it it would otherwise create a rescindable transaction under stale or federal law.Collateral which secures any present or future indebtedness of Borrower to any subsidiary bank of FirseBank Holding Company of Colorado will also secure this note.As additional security for the Obligations,Borrower grants t0 FirstBank a security interest in all deposit and certificated accounts maintained by Borrower at any subsidiary bank of FirseBank Holding Company of Colorado.Borrower waives any homestead rights to which Borrower may be entitled under state or federal law. DEFAULT Unless FirstBank elects otherwise,the unpaid balance of principal and interest hereunder and all other indebtedness of Borrower to FirstBank, direct or indirect,absolute or Contingent, now existing or hereafter arising, shall become immediately due and payable without notice or demand upon occurrence of any of the following events ol default:(a)any payment required by this note is not made when due:(b)a delault or event of default occurs under any loan or security agreement or other instrument executed as security for or in connection with this note;(c)Borrower shall be in delault under any other indebtedness to or agreement with FirstBank;(d)any warranty,representation or statement made or furnished to FirstBank by or on behalf of Borrower in connection with this note proves to have been false in any material respect when made or furnished;(e)death,dissolution,termination of existence, merger,consolidation,insolvency,business failure,appointment of a receiver of any part of the property of,assignment for the benefit of creditors by,or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency law byor against Borrower;(I)FirstBank shall reasonably and in good faith determine and notify Borrower that any Collateral for this note is insufficient as to quality or quantity;(g)FirstBank shall be notified of the failure of Borrower or any guarantor to provide financial and other information promptly when reasonably requested by FirstBank;or(h)FirstBank at any time in good faith believes that the prospect of any payment required by this note is impaired,whether or not such belief is caused by any act or failure to act of Borrower,After default . or acceleration by FirstBank, the unpaid balance of this note shall accrue interest al the post-maturity rate described above. II this note is reduced to judgment,the judgment shall accrue interest at the same post-maturity rate. e COLLECTION COSTS If FirstBank enforces this Aote upon default,Borrower agrees to pay of reimburse FirstBank for reasonable expenses incurred in collecting the amount due and obtaining possession of and realizing on any Collateral securing this note.Borrower shall be Gable for the reasonable attorney's tees of FirstBank and costs of suit in the event collection proceedings are initiated upon this note or upon any agreement securing this note. MISCELLANEOUS The Loan Amount shown is the maximum amount which FirstBank has committed to loan Borrower.Additional sums will not be loaned to Borrower under any circumstances unless FirstBank commits to d0 so in writing.The responsibilities and duties of FirstBank to Borrower are limited to those described in this note and any related loan document.Any waiver or forbearance under this note by FirstBank must be in writing.FirseBank has made no representations concerning Borrower's objectives and use of the loan proceeds,nor has FirstBank given any assurances to Borrower as to future financing or the adequacy ol the loan proceeds for Borrower's business purposes.Borrower consents to the release of information to third parties from time to time concerning FirstBank's credit experience with Borrower,This note shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the Slate of Colorado.In the event litigation is commenced under this note,Borrower waives any jurisdictional defenses and consents to the tunsdectien of the appropriate court in the State of Colorado.Borrower represents and warrants that the purpose of this loan is primarily business,commercial or agricultural.No delay or omission on the part of FirstBank In exercising any right under this note or other related instrument shag operate as a waiver of such right or of any other right.A waiver on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to or waiver of any such right or remedy on any future occasion.Borrower waives presentment,protest,notice Of dishonor and any other condition precedent to the enforcement by FirstBank of any remedy.Borrower expressly consents to the release of any Collateral, the release of any party primarily or secondarily liable hereunder,any extension of time Or Indulgence Warned by FirstBank and agrees that the occurrence of any of these events shall have no effect upon the Borrower's liability for the Obligations.This note shall be binding upon Borrower and upon Borrower's personal representatives,heirs,successors and assigns,and shall benefit FirstBank and its successors and assigns. ' Borrower acknowledges the receipt,on the note date hereof,of a completely filled in copy of this note, TILE FURROW CORPORATION C+ BY: INDIVIDUALLY BY: , t.VILL8G Hupp, c,:easdenc tree m. aerciCn uuutta i.. aeklch Donna L. Sekich, Secretary Nick Sekich, Jr. Karen Sekich rLeo ix. aekiCu LrUlltn4 nupp castle nuyy • 890371 "'$IMrled at m else 11., RC:GOM on No. DEE!) OE TRUST THIS INDENTURE,Made this 26th day of January . 19 89 .between SEKICH EQUIPMENT CO. , A COLORADO CORPORATION whose address is P.O. Box 508. Longmont, Colorado 80501 hereinafter referred to as grantor,and the Public Tnistee of the "County of Weld , Slate of Colorado,hereinafter referred to as Public Trustee. WITNESSETH,THAT,WHEREAS. The Furrow Corporation C+ has executed a promissory note or notes.hereinafter referred to in the singular,dated January 26, 1989 ,fur the principal sum of Fifty Thousand 6 00/100 Dollars.payable to the order of FirstBank of North Longmont, N.A. whoseaddressis 1707 North Main Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501 Twelve (12) months alter the date hereof,with interest thereon from the date thereof at the rate of B+1.0 perecnt per annum,pa$hk on or before January 26. 1990 with quarterly ityterest due April 26, 1989, July 26, 1989. and October 26, 1989 AND WHEREAS,The grantor is desirous of securing payment of the principal and intctrstof said promissory note in whose hands soever the said note or any of them may be, NOW,THEREFORE,The grantor.in consideration of the premises and for the putpdre aforesaid.does hereby grant.bargain,sell and convey unto the said Public Trustee in trust forever.the following described properly,situate in the County of Weld ,State of Colorado,to wit: Lot 1, Block 4, REPLAT "A" of Sekich Business Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, • County of Weld, State of Colorado C ^ also known by street and number as • TO HAVE AND TOIIOLD the same,together with all and singular the privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging:In Trust nevertheless,that in case ofdelult in the payment of said note orany of them.orany part thereof.or in the payment of the interest thcrcon,accordmgtnthe tenor and effect of said note or any of them,or in the payment Many prior encumbrances.principal or interest.if any,or incase default shall be made in or in case of violation or bread,o1 any of the terns,conditions,canvenallts or:queen teats loci\m contained,the bench Weary hereunder or the legal holder of the indebtedness secured hereby may deelare a violation of any of the covenants herein contained and elect CO advmtlse said property fr sale and demand such sale,then, upon tiling nonce of such election and demand for sale with the Public Trustee,who shall upon receipt of such notice of election and demand for sale cause a copy of the same to be recorded in the recorder'soffice of the county in which said real estateissitu;ted.it shall and may be lawful for die Public Trustee to sell and dispose of the same(en masse or in separate parcels.as the said Public Trustee may Mini.best),and all the right,tide and interest of the granor, his heirs or assigns therein,at public auction at the main front door of the Court House,in the County of Weld - State of ColoratW.ur on said premises,or any part thereof as may be specMBed in the noticeof said sale,for the highest and best price the same will bring in cash,four weeks public notice having been previously given of the time and place of such sale,by advertisement.weekly,in some newspaper of general circulation at that time tsuhbshed in said County of Weld ,a copy of which trrk'e shall be nailed- within ten days from the date of the lint publication thereof to the grantor al the address herein given and to such person or persons appearing to have acquired a subsequent record interest in said real estate at the address given in the recorded instrument:where only the county and state is given as the address then such notice shall be ruled to the county seal,and to make and gist to the purchaser or purchasen of such property at such sate,a certificate - or certificates in writing describing such property purchased,and the suns or bunts paid therefor,and the time when the purchaser or purchasers for other person entitled theretut shall be entitled to a deed order ds therefor,unless the same shall be redeemed as is pnwided by law;and said Public Trustee shall, upon demand by the person or persons holding the said certificate or certificates of purchase,when said demand is made,or upon demand by the person entitled to a deed to and for the property purchased,at the tone such demand is made,the(how for redemption having expired.slake and execute to such person or persons a deed or deeds to the said property purchased,which said deed or deeds shall be in the ordinary firm of a conveyance,and shall be signed,uckmwledged and delivered by the said I'ohhc'trustee and shall convey and quitclaim to such parson or persuin entitled to such deed.the said pmpeny purchased as aluresaid and all the right,title,interest,henetii and equity of redemption of the grantor,his heirs and assigns thereto,and shall recite the sin or sums for which the said property was sold and shall refer to the power of sale therein contained,and to the sale or sales made by virtue - thereof;and in case of an assignment of such certificate or certificates of purchase,or in case of the redemption of such property.by a subsequent encumbrancer,such assign main or reile.nptl.n shall also be Is retied to hl such heed or deeds;but the notice of sale need not he set out In sods deed Of deeds and the Public Trustee stall,out of the proeccds ur avals of such sale,after first paying and retaining all lies,charges amt costs of Making said sale, pay to 1Iw beneficiary hereunder or the legal holder of said nine the principal and interest due on said note according to that tenor and effect thereof,and all _ moneys advanced by such beneficiary or legal holder of said note for insurance,taxes and assessments,with interest thereon at 36.0 per cent per annum,rendering the o verplus.if any,unto the grantor,his legal representatives or assigns:which sale or sales and said deedor deeds so made shalt be a perpetual bar.both in law and equity,against Ilw grantor,his heirs and assigns,and all other persons claiming the said property,or any part thereof.by. from,through or under the grantor,or any of then,.The holder or holden ul said note or notes may purchase said property or any part thereof;and it shah not be obligatory upon the purchaser or purchasers at any such sale to see to the application of the purchase money.If a release deed be required,it is agreed that the grantor,his heirs or assigns,will pay the expense thereof. 'If In Denver.based"City and." No.341A.Rev.244.DEED OP TRUST(Nnblk*vtte)With Doe en Sae Chwuro nrdrord PuMhMna,5525 W OJT Ave.,Lakewood,CO 80214—0:M y a* 747 Oa 890371 a • • Assguii ntt of i&nnts To further secure the prompt payment of all sums maturing under that certain Promissory Note and Deed of Trust of even date herewith, made, executed and delivered to the order of FirstBank of North Longmont, N.A., 1707 North Main Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501 encumbering: Lot 1, Block 4, REPLAT "A" of Sekich Business Park. according to the recorded plat thereof, County of Weld, c State of Colorado. The undersigned, for and in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other valuable considerations, th dge, assie ipt wor a is ssor holder the d�r7_ j�f r t ri gn and setpover s ly i said Association or any successor holder of the to e r t n d from said premises, expressly directing said Association or any successor holder, in case ofdefault in th a ment of said indebtedness, or any part thereof, or upon failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of said Note and Deed of Trust, to collect such rents, to take possession of said premises without having a receiver appointed therefor, and to manage the same and to apply the net receipts first upon the cost of collection and management and then upon the said indebtedness. A release of said Deed of Trust shall release this Assignment of Rents. Executed this 26th day of January , J989. SEKICH EQUIPMENT CO. , A COLORADO CORPORATION NEAL) kred Sexicn, President DEAL) NICK JeKicn, Jr. , Vice President STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF BOULDER la The foregoing assignment was acknowledged before me this 26th day of January • 1989 by Fred Sekich, President, and Nick Sekich, Jr. , Vice President of Sekich Equipment Co., A Colorado Corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires Notary Public 890371 I I • • • OR Mot•1(1/85) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Donver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manner of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A dellherate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself oonathutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant. 1. Nam*or Bilinear: I Dart SodW deafly Number The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Plus I 1/1?/89 522-90-9739 2. Your Full Name:(lastrlirst/middle) 3. Also Known As: (maiden narnwnckmme,ex.) Hopp, Martha Ann (Borgmann) 4.)Mailing Address: (if different from residence) Nome Telephone: (303) 776-0526 5,Reetdence Address: (street and number,city,state,zip 11413 WCR 13, Longmont, CO 80501 6. Is your residence: ❑OWNED RENTED 6 rented,from whom? August Borgmann Estate 7. Date or Binh: I Mace of Birth: a. U.S.Citizen? YES ElFebruary 2, 1938 Longmont. Colorado NO it natwSizad,stee where: When: Name of u.S.District Court: Natwalixaton Caryhate No.: Date of Cerorrate: If en alien.give Alien's Registration Cad NolPerma al Residence Card No.: 9. Height Weight Hsi Color: Eye C Sex: Race: ' 10.Do you have a Colorado Delvers License? If yes;give number. 5'6" I 150 I Brn Iolor.Blue F Anatn ©YE3 CND F-100238 11. What la your relationship to the eppbant?(sole owner,partner,corpora cabs,Gregor.stockholder or manager): Corporated.•opt% director and stockhoWer 12. If Stockholder,Numbs(of Shares Owned Beneficially or of Record: Percent of°vaunterq Stag Owned: 5,000 shares 16.66% 13.d Pairs,state whetter. Percent of PapwNip Beneficially Owned: 0 GENERAL 0 LMNTED 14.Noma of Present Employer: ! 15.Type of Business of Employment Self Bousewife 16.Address of Business Where Employed:(street end number,deb state,zip) Business Telephone: n/a 17.Present Position: n/a 18.Marital Status: 11L.Name of Spouse:(Include maiden name if applicable) Married rnnrsgl Dale HOnn 20.Spouse's Dore of Birth: Spouse's Place of Binh: July 23, 1937 I Mead. Colorado 21.Spouse's residence address.If different than yours:(give street and number,city.state,cep) Same 22.Spouse's Present Employer. Oaxgatlon: n/a I RP7 i rPfl 23,Address of Spouse's Present Employer: n/a • 24.List the flange)of all relelvsewenting in the liquor industry,give their: .. Name or Relative: • I Relsdcnehlp to You: Position held: Name of Employer, toawion of Employer None CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 890371 • • - 25.Co you row,or have you roar Mid a direct or indirect Infest in a State of Colorado Liaudr o Bee License? If'yes;answer in detail. YES ®NO 26.Do you now,or have you ever had a direct or indirect interest M■lquoe or beer license,or been employed in a liquor or beer related business outside of the State of Colorado? I'yes:desabe In detail. OYES xf :ND 27,Have you ever bean oonvlcted of■Dame,lined,Imprisoned,placed on probation,received a suspended sentence or forfeited bail for any offense in tximina or military court?(Do not include traffic violations,unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your drivers lion..or you were convicted of driving under the influence of aloolalb beverages,) If saes,'explain in dotal. O YES 0 NO 26, Have you ever reoeNed a vidaeon notice,suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation,or been denied a liquor or beer herniae anywhere in the U.S.? If yes.'explain in devil. ❑YES NO 20.Have you ever held a gambling or gaming license or owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? If yes;explain in dotal below. ID Yes fNO 1 StaterFederal: Yet City: State: 1 1 State/Federal: I Year: City: I State: 30.hfGtay Senior:(branch) From: To: i Serial No.: {Type of Discharge:tionm • __lI it 31.Um all addresses where you have lived for the lam fie yew.(Attach separate sheet if necessary) ( Street and Number City,State,Zip From: To: I` 6519 WCR 34 Platteville, Co 80651 1958 1987 i 32.List all tonne,macron or businesses reaped In within the Nat five yes.(Attach separate sheets if necessary.) I Name of employer:. I Address:(after,number,city,state,Zip) i Position Held: From: To: I None j � I 33.List the names end attach letters of teoenmendadon from three parson who con vouch ter your good character end flans in connection with this application. Name of referrer: Address:(sheet,number,airy,see,zip) No.of Years Knorm: 4322 Hwy 66 Diana Bassett Longmont, CO 80501 6 years 17303 WCR 13 Steve & Meryl Seewald Platteville, CO 80651 30 years 11525 WCR 13 Wynona M. Henn Lonomont, CO 80501 30 years OATH OF APPLICANT 1 declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all informatio'+therein is true,correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. SMgature;- Tide: Date: 177/1,51/14:11.-7 -- / re Director & Shareholder i/yen 9903'71, ��y_ . '3, 92 i 9 �"'/ 0.-N L"' ..:1.K%E-4J'�_-f 2.e*- f�l.f.. . e /, c2/ *4u' �� 2te 4:1-00-e,' a L�i2 a.-- . ev��t h�,.Le� R IJ 1(lur�c cc. -&cyJ/' L 4 _..-Ii a---cam ./()•c c-tu-.✓ '5717,-c4....1.4 a �aa', 2 -cie .✓G2 II ,L-1, r c/ ye+`1—rid-c,..cc _maim"--et,-.Imo/et -211-rc•c-, c r/ r _,-4-x.,t,r; .ha.oG./—/w Beech/ Gthe..4 lr..e%i,' Lam.lyrz c.f.-e-, �rrc u. '14-i2e`ZGP-Y� _s -r ln/"K.t-f r�'y�:�v,CL cc% Q-/ /� /-�.d ..-74.t.7 —, �f�/cf_—c;:O.4 .ilu-{-tic/„Zia. G`-hc�/leat,✓, -�L _A pr GC- /nL t c ✓).e_✓y,e7Cot- i-ec-< 7Lr- .t t et.--y (� .G G,/^n72-L4,d. -r,t! f:-f 0,-(-1---1.1 KLC --y Le-teC444 ti."/ a ��eL L.-, 7 ,t,,, he==� -zit c',1'' a--t L e.�• /(--/ ,--.2..44- A (1/t4-c..,,:t�Z.C1 '�l/a.-1.tdcre- ,e.,,:/ GL- 22'1 :,e-/ «,-,.tL- C''ec,,.....-.� l "4.r-cry' -e. rc74. .- t,G . .LJ .i/tei J�p•-et" z,L+er !* `'u-t� 6&-ne-'J'7' C�l .-I.fJ Lc-'/t/�l �p Q - E-1-- L�AC21L� Q/!/ L-1Lwf� /�L2_Lc,tt-e'w' d antic d -.2•12„,-,,e,/, / • 1 r /45--71x- — I _41, i9 .� �or�y-,-i , (1 . zes-e/ 890371 . a • • Steve & Meryl Lee Seewald 17303 WCR 13 Platteville, Co. 80651 Jan. 6, 1989 To Whom It May Concern, We have known Conrad and Martha Hopp for 15 years. We know them to be people of high moral character. They have both been active in activities which help and improve the community. Conrad and Martha have always been very fair in business matters and we give our full support to any and all of their endeavors. Sincerely, sGGG!{1 e� Steve Seewald Meryl Lee Seewald 890371 • • KISKYLAN SUBJECT: LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION CONRAD & MARTHA HOPP DATE: January 14, 1989 To Whom It May Concern: Conrad and Martha Hopp represent the type of valued residents every community needs and appreciates. I have had the opportunity as both a neighbor and businessowner to benefit from their sincere commitment to the community. Conrad and Martha have both contributed endless hours to the school system, community sponsored activities and in the development of youth sports programs. Conrad, in particular, has also volunteered and served on various boards and committees, to include; - the Longmont Fire Protection District as President for four years and Vice President for two; - the Local Beet Growers Association as President for two years, and Secretary-Treasurer for ten years; - the Mead Volunteer Fire Department as Chief for two years, and active volunteer for eight years; - the Northern Colorado AgriBusiness Association as Secretary for six years; - the Weld County AgiBusiness Stabilization & Conservation as Vice President for two years and active member for eight years; - the Mead Elementary and Jr. High Parant Advisory Council for many years; the YMCA Youth Sports Assn. as basketball coach and Mead Youth Sports Association as baseball coach. Conrad and Martha have farmed in the community for over 32 years, been actively involved in the schools and church with all their children and are highly thought of in the community. Their presence in the community has been exemplary and I feel we have been fortunate to have them as neighbors. Yours) ttruly._ Diana Bassett 890371 INSURANCE&RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES Risk Plan,Inc. 4322 Hwy 66 Longmont,Cobrado 80501 (303)5354782 • ! DA 6401•I(148) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation.ALL questions must bo answered In their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be chocked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Reef constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the apptlunt 1. Nana of Guinan: I One: Seen Sonny Number: The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Plus I 1/12/89 522-50-0928 12. Your Full Name:(teetfirsttlnlddls) 3, Also Known As: Oman nemrrlkleanle,etc.) 11 Nogg, Conrad Dale Connie 4.)Mailing Address: (If different from reslderlce) Noma Telephone: (303) 776-0526 5.Realdenoe Address: (street and numbr,city.state.zip 11413 WCR 13, Longmont, CO 80501 8. Is your residence: 0 OWNED RENTED I K rented.horn whom? August Borgmann Estate 17, Date of Birth: I Race of Binh: I S. U.S.Citizen? July 23, 1937 Mead. Colorado a yrs_ ❑No If naturalized,state what Men: I Name of U.S.Olseia Court Natural zaoon Castigate No.: Date of Catfloate: 11 an Lien,give Allen's Registration Card No.:IPsrmsrwt Residence Card Na.: 19. Height Weight Heir Color: I Eye Cola: Sex: Rev: 10.Do you have a Colorado Drives License? If yea,'give number. 6'3" 1258 Brn Brn M Anglo ®YES ❑ie E 174317 II I. What is your relationship to the applicant?(sole owner,partner,corporate officer,director,stecwclder or martens): Corporate officer, director, stockholder and manager 12. K stockhoier.Number of Shares Owned BaneMtlslly or of Record: I Percent of Outstanding Stock Owned: 5,000 shares 16.66% 13.a Partner.stets whetter: Percent of Pa trwshlp Beneficially Owned: ❑GENERAL ❑ LIMITED 14.Name of Present Employer: 15,Typo of Business of Employment Self I Retired 16.Address of Business Where Employed:(street and number,city,sus.zip) I Busktess Telephone: n/a n/a y 17,Present Position: n/a ie.Manta!Status: I 19.Name of Spouse:(inane maiden Male d applicable) Married Martha Ann (Borgmann) Hoop 20.Spouses Date of Birth: Spouse's Race of Binh: February 2. 1938 Lnnrtmnnr. rnlnrarp 21.Spouse's residence address,If different than yours:(des atrft sad number,caw.sate,zip) Same 22.Spouse's Present Employer: Odor: Self Housewife 23.Address of Spouse%Present Employer: n/a 24.List the name(e)of all relatives working in the liquor industry,give their: Anne of Relative: I inatlauNp to You: Position held: Name of Employer: Location of Employer. None • I I CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 890371 e • • 25.Co you now,or have you ever held■direct or indirect interest in a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License? It'yea;ammo in detail. ❑ YES ®No 26.O0 you now,or have you ever had a dlrea or Siva interest M■Iloum Or beer gcene.i,or been employed in a Ilqua or beer related business outside of the Stab of Colorado? M yes;describe in detail. ❑YES ®NO 27.Have you ever been convicted eta crime.fined,imp sorted,placed on probation,received a euepended sentence Or forfeited bell for any offense in ayn:na Or mllitery MA?(Do not Include traffic violations,unite.they resulted in suspension or revocation of yew Mimes Norse,or you were convicted of driving under the influence of sChoiio beverages.) If yes:explain in deWl. ❑ YES X❑NO 2S. Haw you ever received a violation notice,suspension or revocation for a Iquor its violation,or been denied a liquor Of beer license anywhere in the U.S.? It yes:explain in detail, ❑YES ®NO 29.Have you ear hold a gambling a gaming license or owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? P yes:moan in detail below, ❑YES ®NO SutelFederal: Yea: I Cry: I State: State/Federal: Year: City: Stew 30.Military Service:(branch) From: ' To: Sepal No.: Type of Discharge: None 3t.List all addresses when you have lived for the last five years.(Mach separate sheet It necessary) • Street aid Number City.State.Zip From: To: 6519 WCR 34 Platteville, CO 80651 1958 1987 32.List as forma,employers a burns engaged in within the last Ave years.(Attach separate sheets if necessary) Named employer:. Address:(street,number,city,state,zip) I Position Held: From: To: Self (Hopp Farms) 6519 WCR 34, Platteville, CO 80651 I Partner 1958 1987 • 33.List the names and attach letters of recommendation from three persona who con vouch for your good character and fitness in mmnecdon with this application. Name of reference: I Addrna:(street,number.city,.rate,zip) I No.of Yews Known: 401 Main Street Richard L. Salberg Longmont, CO 80502-0209 I 17 years 4322 Hwy 66 Diana Bassett Longmont, CO 80501 I 6 years 17303 WCR 13 Steve & Mervl Seewald Platteville, CO 80651 I 30 years OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that!have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all information therein is true,correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. s roag%7c Date: (/ F Director, Shareholder & 10/2-0 (� 890371 . I I e • I Richard L.Salberg Executive Vice President First National Longmont The First National Bank of Longmont 401 Main Street P.O.Box 209 Longmont.Colorado 80502-0209 303/776.5800 January 17, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAX CONCERN: It has been my privilege to have known Conrad D. Hopp since 1972. He vas a customer of the First National Bank of Johnstown and I was an Executive Officer of that bank until March of last year. During those years I worked with him in my capacity as a loan officer and I found him to not only be a very knowledgeable individual, but one that was very fair and honest in our business relationship. Even during the years that agriculture was experiencing difficulties, Mr. Hopp was always honest and above board and I did appreciate that very much. Whatever he said he would do, he did. I realize this letter is very general in matters, so if you need more specific information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly Qyouurs�,, �J Executive Vice President 890371 KISKYLAN SUBJECT: LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION CONRAD & MARTHA HOPP DATE: January 14, 1989 To Whom It May Concern: Conrad and Martha Hopp represent the type of valued residents every community needs and appreciates. I have had the opportunity as both a neighbor and businessowner to benefit from their sincere commitment to the community, Conrad and Martha have both contributed endless hours to the school system, community sponsored activities and in the development of youth sports programs . Conrad, in particular, has also volunteered and served on various boards and committees, to include; - the Longmont Fire Protection District as President for four years and Vice President for two; - the Local Beet Growers Association as President for two years, and Secretary-Treasurer for ten years; - the Mead Volunteer Fire Department as Chief for two years, and active volunteer for eight years; - the Northern Colorado AgriBusiness Association as Secretary for six years; - the Weld County AgiBusiness Stabilization & Conservation as Vice President for two years and active member for eight years; - the Mead Elementary and Jr. High Parant Advisory Council for many years; - the YMCA Youth Sports Assn. as basketball coach and Mead Youth Sports Association as baseball coach. Conrad and Martha have farmed in the community for over 32 years, been actively involved in the schools and church with all their children and are highly thought of in the community. Their presence in the community has been exemplary and I feel we have been fortunate to have them as neighbors. Your truly, Diana Bassett 890371 INSURANCE 8 RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES Risk Plan.Inc. 4322 Hwy.66 Longmont.Colo/act 80501 (303)5354782 • • Steve & Meryl Lee Seewald 17303 WCR 13 Platteville, Co. 80651 Jan. 6, 1989 To Whom It May Concern, We have known Conrad and Martha Hopp for 15 years. We know them to be people of high moral character. They have both been active in activities which help and improve the community. Conrad and Martha have always been very fair in business matters and we give our full support to any and all of their endeavors. Si� t F � � �tkerely, (2� � �/�+// Steve Seewald Meryl Lee Seewald 890371 • • DR 6401-I(118) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant. P I. Name of Business: Ds: Boas 5wrr eny Number: The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Ping I 1/12/89 1524-48-7215 2. Your Full Name;dast/Nstrrniddle) 13. Also Known As: (maiden nieneinicimeme.etc.) Frederick Michael Sekich I Fred 4.)Meiling Address: (if different from residence) Nome Telephony y (303) 535-4902 5.RenM.nCe Address: (street and number,otY.state,zip 6401 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 I e. Is your residence: If rented,from whom? ® OWNED 0 RENTED 7, Date of Barth: Place of arm: 16. U.S.°S an? June 30, 1936 i Longmont, Colorado )0 YEs ON IIf naturalized,an where: When Nome of U.S.Distria Court INaturalization Certitlam No.: Date of Certflcate: If an alien,give Allen's Regttrerbn CC No.:Pamanem Residence CC No.: Is+ Height I 90 I HairCColor: I Eye Colr: I Seen. I Race: glo IO.Do Coorsdo Dd TES ONO 8324bww7 lt'yest pin number: Iit Whet Is your nlatbnan:0 to the wn epplinant7(sole oer.plow coeporma Once,dlretior,stocellobder or manager): Corporate director and stockholder 112. If Stiokholdw.Number of Shame Owned BehescWN or O Record: Percent of ouatarbirp Stick Owned: 5,000 shares 16.663 113,If Palo*,stale whether, Percent of Partnership BoneAds$y Owned: 0 GENERAL 0 LINKED 14.Name of Present Employe•: ,5.Type of Business of Employment Self r Farming and Qeinging 16,Address of Business when Employ.d:(street and number.dry.sate,Opt Busker Telephone: 14010 Mead Street, Longmont, co ' 80501 _ (303) 535-4643 17,Present Position: Owner 18.Maier Stews: I ne It Na of Spw.a:(Muds maiden name if eppGoabl) Married Donna Lea ( Clark ) Sekich 20.Spouse's Date of Birth: I Spouse'.Race or Birth: January 9, 1938 Longmont, CO 80501 2'.Spouse's residage address,it Merl than yours:Wee street are number,dry,stet bp) 22.Spouse's Present Employer: I Oo upeecr: Not employed n/a 23,Address Of Spouse's Priem Employer. n/a 24,Us!the naM(s)Of eft nettles waking In die Moor InOusvy,pin their Name of Relative: I Relationshp to You: Position held: Name of Employer. Location of Employer: None i I CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE . 890371 • • • 25.Do you now•Of have you over held a direct or indirect rawest in a Stale of Colorado Liquor or Beer Liana? If yes;sewer In detail, ❑YES ®No 28.Do you now,or have you ever had a dome or Indirect Interest in a liquor or beer license.or been employed Ina liquor or beer related Cuteness outside of the State of Colorado? If yea;dwaa @ in detail. ❑YES ®NO 27.Have you ever been odnvb$d of a aim.,fined,Imprisoned,placed on probation.received a suspended sentence or forfeited bail for any offense in alminal or military court?(Do not Oda traffic Slstipu,unaw they faulted in suspension Of revocation of your drivel.license,or you were convicted of driving under the influence of alooialic beverages.) If yes;explain In detail, Q YES 28. Have you wow received a violation nonce,suspension or revocad8n for a liquor law violation,Or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? It yes;explain in detail, ❑ YES ❑X NO 29.Have you ever held a()ambling a gaming license or owned a Federal Garnblirq Stamp? If yea'explain in detail below. ❑TES ®NO State/Federe Year I City: I State: StaterFedera: Year: City: I State: 30.Military Silvia:(branch) From: I To: Serial No.: Type of Dleclwge: None 31.List all addresses where you have lived for the last five years.(Attach separate sheet if necessary)Street and Number City,State,Zip From: To: 6401 Hwy 66 Longmont, CO 80501 11985 Present 6500 WCR 32 Longmont, CO 80501 11955 1985 i I 32.List all former employers or bueanee.ea engeped In within the last five years.(Attach separate eheeta of necessary.) Name of employer:. Address:(street number,dry,state,zip) Position Held: I From: To: Manager/ Sekich Equipment I25 & Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 Owner 11973 1987 Owner/ . Sekich Business Park 14010 Mead Street, Longmont, CO 80504 Manager 1. 1987 Present 33.List doe names and attach letters of recommendation from three persons who ca n vouch for your pod character fitness want ess an connection this application. . Name of reference: I Address:(sent,number,city,stale,zip) I No.of Yeas Known: • 1 19279 WCR 17 Edward S. Reichert Johnstown, CO 80534 20 years 13807 Elmore Road David Pietrangelo Longmont, CO 80501 15 years 1713 Fleming Drive Harlan Glantz Longmont, CO 80501 30 years OATH OF APPLICANT 1 declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all information therein is true,correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. • Savour.: Tit*: Dam: V M. / L/ksr' QJter<ciar 890371 • • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Fred Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship . Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, Address: `J O 890371 To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Fred Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship . Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours , ter_ 6 ✓ • AC 4/wilts Address: /9.2^79 UJc2 / 7 890371 To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Fred Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours , v/GUf41.6k� 7 / Address: /, / gA?nt—c 890371 ! S OR idiot-I(146) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each ot1eer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing?.uthorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for Its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood w10 Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant. It. Name of Burnes: Oahe: Social Sea by r:Numbe The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Plus I 1/12/89 524-42-7(244 2. Yow Full Name:(lasmesvmlddle) 3. Also Known As: (mean neme'nCNtame,eta) Sekich, Donna Lea (Clark) 4.)Mailing Pares*: (If different from residence) Nome TMephaw (303) 535-4902 5.Rsetdeace Address: (street and number,city.state,zip 6401 HwV M. Tnnrrnnnt. rn Rncrt1 6. Is your residence; I if ranted,from wham? ®OWNED 0 RENTED 17. Dete of Binh: Place of Siam: 6. U.S.Citizen? January 9, 1938 Longront, Colorado a YES 0NO If naturMizea,state where: + When: Neme of U.S.District Court Naturalization Certificate No.: Oats of Corridor: II If an alien,give Allen's Registration Cad No.:Pannanrr Recdence Card No.: I I9, Height Weight iHair Color: Eye Color: Sox: Race: 110.Do you have a Colorado Divers License? ff yea;give number 5'5" 110 I Blond Brn F IAnglo [2 ws ONO F-43FV7 it. What is your relationship to to applicant?(sole owner.puma,corporate°MAost direr stoS,Mdr or mercer): Corporate officer, director and shareholder 12. If Stocahcider,Number of Share Owned Ben efclelly or of Record: Peram of Outstanding Stoat Owned: t3.If Paoter,state whether. Percent of Pan nhp Ben kisily Owned: 0 GENERAL 0 LIMITED 14.Name of Present Employer: ` 15.Type of Waimeaof Ernpbyment Not employed I I n/a • 16.Address of Burins Where Employed:(mast and number.dfy,start zit) I Business Telephone: n/a n/a t7.Present Position: n/a 1 18.Marital Status: 119.Name of Spouse:(include maiden neme d applicable) Married Frederick Michael Sekich 20.Spouses Date or Birth: I Soouss%rate of Birth: June 30, 1936 Longmont, Colorado 21.Spouse's residence address,It different than your:(der meat end number.WY.ern.zip) 22.Spouse's Present Employer: I Qodpetdn: Sekich Business Park Fanner/Developer 23,Address of Spouses Present Employer: 14010 Mead Street, Longmont, CO 80501 24.Vat the name(s)of all relatives wonting in the liquor Industry,give thee: Name of Relative: Relallonhl to You: Position heir Herne of Employer: Loafdn of Enptoyec None cownsueD ON REVERSE SIDE SS0371 ..... 25.00 yo,now,of have you aver held a direct or indirect invest in a State of Colorado Liquor or Bar License? If yes;answer in deWl. YES aNO 28.Do you now,or have you ever had a direct or Indirect Interest Ina liquor or beer license,or been employed In a liquor or bear related business slide of the Stab of . Colorado? tf yes;oesalbe In detail. ❑ YES ENO 27.Have you ever been convicted°f an.alma,fined,'Snorted,placed on probation,received a suspended sentence of forfeited ball for any offense In criminal or military li court?(Do not include traffic violations,unless they resulted In suepenson or revocation of your drivers license,of you ww convicted of driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages) It yes;explain In detail, ® YES 0 NO 28. Have you ever received a violation notice,suspension or revocation fora liquor In violation,or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes.explain in detail. 0YES zgNo 20.Have you ever Mid■gambling or gaming license Of owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? If yet'explain in detail below. 0 YES NO IState/Federal: Year. I City: State: IState/Federal: Year: I City: Sate: 30.Millwy Service:(branch) From: To: I Serial No.: I Type of Discharge: None 181.Uet ati addressee where you have lived for the last five yaws.(Attach separate sheet if necessary) Street and Number I City.State,Zip From: To: 6401 Hwy 66 (Longmont. CO 80501 1985 vrpsont 6500 WCR 32 Longmont. CO 80501 1455 14RC I 32.List all former employers or businesses engaged In within the la at eve years.(Attach separate antes if necessary.) Name of employe:- I Address:(str e,numbs,dry,state,zip) Position Held: I From: To: Norris Accounting I Mtn View. Longmont. CO 80501 .4 9/1984 . Poncet Chemical 1430 Sherman. LOnamonf. •Co 80501 Rer•r.+rsrr 19/1484 1 /1 go", Furrow Restaurant 1-25 & Hwy 66. Long " mont. CO 80501 M ^fir' (1 /3987 O/14Rp I 37.List the names and attach letters of recommendation from three persona who corn votrc,for your good character and Illness In connecter)with this application. Name of reference: Address:(street,number.dry,an,zip) I No.of Years Known: 1238 Fox Hill Drive Charles D. Spurr Longmont, CO 80501 I 25 years 39 South Parish Avenue Gerald r C^h1. 'ne1 Johnstown. CO 80534 20 years 1 2316 Emery Street How.rve aiv1nr Longmont, CO 80501 20 years OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all information therein is true.correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. gi°ro' I Td: Director, Shareholder'Date: li �/ e a?.. ,d; 4 _%_.., Ice- n 890371 S 27. In 1974 the applicant entered a plea of nolo contendre to a charge of conspiracy to commit theft . The applicant was fined $7,500 .00 by the District Court of Weld County. 890371 - • • To Whom It May Concern : I have been acquainted with Donna Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. it is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, C. ocw Address: ' 31 L. enr-6-'-4' • 7L 51. • • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Donna Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, Address: 3 ��i /YY'4 / G / 890371 To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Donna Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, drAL A(9. /23PY ��'� i, e- s Address: 890371 To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Donna Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, 4.0-44411-09- C. . t 3 �l S o . f � S b. p�.1 n�., ..S-%Cuwv. CA o • RoS3L Address: 890371, I ! DR 0401-!Wes) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver,Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,each general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood wilt Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant 1. Name or Business: I Data: 5eeW Security Number The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Plus 1/12/89 521-58-3769 2. Your Pull Name:(taaversVmlddle) 3. ANo Known As: (macen nanwniclaun».ex) Sekich, Nicholas John, Jr. Butch 4.)Mailing Address: Of dllfaent Imre rider) Mama Toleplrant (303) 535-4338 S.Resider«Address: (greet and number,dry.sr zW 6769 WCR 32, Longmont, CO 80501 e. Is your r«Idende: If rented,from whin? OWNED O RENTED 7. Dad of BIM: Place of Binh: a U.S.Gdzen? April 5, 1943 Longmont, CO ®YES Qt+3 If naturalized,irate where: I What: Nerve of U.S.Diaaa Court Naturslizaoon Cerrtcas No.: I Date of Certificate: It en alien,give Akn's Registration Cr No.:IPermenant Residence Card No.: 0 Height I Weight I Hair CobCabeEye Color: Sex: Race: 10.Do you haw■Colorado Drivers License? it-yes;give nuttier b 6'4" 225 Brn I Brn I M I Analo OYES ©NDwio *1779313043 11. What Is your relationship to the eppnrant?(sole Orr,partner,corporate Officer,directr,stockholder or mangle): Corporate officer, director and stoclrbr14Ar 12. If Stockholder,Number of Slum Owned Beneficially or of Record: Percent of ClUtst tang Stock Owned: 5,000 shares 1.6 6AI 13.If Pella,sate whetter: Prowler Psewr&)p Bn&&y Cared: Q GENERAL O LIMItED le,Nero of Present Employer: 15.Type of 6uslees of Employment Self Ruci nesq flalrp nmmp*Lr/Farms nn 1e.Address of Burs.rem Employed:(street and number.dry.rm.zp) Burr Telephone: 4301 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501' (303) 535-4643 17.Present Poaidon: 18.Marital Sins: 119.Name Spouse:of (ndude moan mars d squaw Married I Karen Sue Newman Sekich 20,Spouse's Dare of BiM: Spou«Y Place of Bill:June 12, 1944 Longmont, CO 21.Spouse's residence admit,If deferent than yours:(give street all number,dry,state,zip) 22.Spouse's Present Employer: I OoCu eclat: Quest R. & I. , Ltd. ( Collection Agency Owner 23,Address of Spouse's Present Employer: 4322 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 24.11a the naile(s)of at relater wring In to roe industry.give their: Name of Rear: Reseorstep so You: Position held: Nees of Employer. I radon of Employer. None I I CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 890371 s • 25,Do you now,or have you ever held•direct or indirect Interest in•Stan of Cared*liquor oe Beee License If yes,'chant In detail. ❑YES eNO 26.Do you now.or have you ever had•direct or indirect Interest in a liquor oe beer license,or been employed in•liquor of beer Sand business outside of the State of Colorado? If yes;describe in deal. ❑YES QNO 27.Have you ever been convicted Of a time.lined.Imprisoned,placed on probation.received•suspended sentence or forfeited ball for any offense in creel or military coon?(Do not include traffic violaeons,unless they resulted In suspension or rwocabun of your drivers license,or you were convicted of awing taper the influence of alcoholio bevereps; If yes;explain in deal. Q YES 3N0 28. Have you ever received•veladon notice,suspension or revocation for•liquor lee violation,or been dried a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes;expleln in detail. ❑VES NO 20.Haw you ever held•gambling or gaming liana or owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? If yes,'explain in detail below. ❑YES aNO State/Fed•rd I Yew: City: I State: State/Federal: Yew: City: State: 30.Mlitaty Sara:(branch) I From: To: I Serial No.: I Type of Discharge: None 31.List all addressee where you have livid for the last law years.(Attach separate sheet if necessary) Street end Number I City,Stan,AD From: To: 6769 WCR 32 I Longmont, CO 80501 1949 $ Present 32.List all former employers or businesses engaged In within the last live years.(Attach separate sheets d necessary.) Nye of employer.. Address:(strew,number,city,state,zip) r Petition Held: From: To: Sekich Farms 6769 WCR 32, Longmont, CO 80501 ( Partner All life: Sekich Business Park 4310 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 Partner 1972 Present Sekich Equipment ( 4310 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 Director 1972 1986 33.List the names and adach letters of recommendation from twee persons who an war for your good character aid fitness In connection with this application, Nara of reference: Address:(street number.city,an,zip) No.of Yews Known: • 1535 Vivian Street Joe Koldeway Longmont, CO 80501 20 years 1535 Vivian Street ' Vern Koldeway Longmont, CO 80501 20 years 1713 Fleming Drive Harlan Glantz Longmont, CO 80501 30 years OATH OF APPLICANT /declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto,and that all informatioi therein is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. • SilgaWre: ALLt ` seer, j Den:21• Vice-President,Director & Shareholder I 2/1/89 890371 • • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Nick Sekich, Jr. for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, Address: 890371 s • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Nick Sekich, Jr. for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, /,QJ.ut %L1 Address: ��/ / /ke_t--11 d/ . 5/ 65° ( 890371 • • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Nick Sekich, Jr. for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship . Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that he is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mr. Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, /2414- Address: X4 4r1 '7'1-7 fir! 890371 4 ! DR awl•IOISE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE UOUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD 1375 Sherman Street Denver.Colorado 80261 To be completed by each individual applicant,oath general and over 5%limited partner of a partnership,each officer,director,and over 5%stockholder of a public corporation,and the manager of the applicant. NOTICE: This individual History Record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities'investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will Jeopardize the application as such falsehood within Itself constitutes evidence regarding the character and reputation of the applicant 1. Name of Business: Dee: Redd Seaway Number: The Furrow Corporation d/b/a Convenience Plus 1/12/89 523-54-5323 2. Your Pull Nerve:pattAl avmlddle) 3. Also Known AE (maiden nsnwrtidvrw e,etc.) Sekichr Karen Sue (Newman) a,)Mailing Address: (if different from resdence) Nome Telephone; 4 (303) 535-4338 5.Residence Adds.; (avaet end number,city,tee,zip 6769 WCR 32, Longmont, CO 80501 6. Is your residence: If ranted.from whom? a OWNED 0 RENTED 7. Dee or BIM: Place or Birth: G a U.S.Citizen? June 12, 1944 I Longmont, CO 80501 ] v s ❑wo If naturalized,state where: I When: Name of U.S.District Court Naturalization Ceniflate No.: Date of Certifkate: If an alien,give Alien's Rog4trst on Cad No.:IPernerint assays Card No.: 9. Height wean Hap Cater: Eye Color Sea: Rea: 10.Do you have a Colorado Drivels Lie ne? tf yes?gel Note 5'6" 1145 I Brn Srn I F Ang1O BYES 0 N F-157288 11. what is your relatCn■nlp to the applicant?(sole owner,partner.ooroaae officer,director.etocsllordsr or manager): Corporate officer, director and stockholder 12. If Stakhoker,Number of Shares Owned BernfdWN or of Record: Percent of Outstanding Stock Owned: 5,000 shares 16.66% 13.ff Parmar,star whether. Percent of Partnership Beneficially Owned: 0 GENERAL ❑ UMREo 14.Name of Present Employer: 15.Type of Business of Employment Quest R. & I. Ltd. Collection Agency 1d.Address of Business Where Employed:(street and number.dry,state,zip) Business Telepho 4322 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 I ne: (303) 535-4401 17,Present Position: Owner/President 18.McItal Status: 119.Nwne or Spouse:(include mewen name If appNabla) Married Nicholas John Sekich, Jr. 20.Spouse's Ow of Birth: 1 Spouse's Pace of Birth: April 5, 1943 I Longmont, CO 80501 21.Spouse's residence address.If different than yours:(sue street end number,dry,sate.zip) 22.Spouses Present Employer: 1 Occupation: Self Business development and farming 23,Address of Spouse's Present Employer: Self • 24,Ust the named)of all redden working in the liquor industry,give their: Name of Rotative: - Relationship to You: i Position held: Pine of Employes Loosest of(Yodeler: None CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 001/445/.L • • • 25.Do you now,or haw you ever held■direct Or indirect interest in a State of Colorado Liquor Of Beer License? If Yes:answer in detail. ❑ YES ENO 28.Do you now,or have you ever had a direct or indirect Interest In a liquor or leer boense,or been employed in a liquor or beer related business outside of the State of Colorado? If yes,'describe In detail. ❑YES ®NO 27.Have you ever been oorwcted of a aims,fined,imprisoned,placed an probation,repived a suspended sentence or forfeited ball for any offense in criminal or military court?(Do not induce Paffc violadms.unless they resulted in suapeneiorl or revocation of yow drivers license,or you were convicted or driving under to influence of alcoholic Swagee,) II ya:expa n in detail. ❑ YES ®NO 28. Have you ever received a violation notice,suspender or revocwbn for a liquor has violation,or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? if yes:explain in detail. ❑YES ENO 29.Have you ever held a gambling or gaming license of owned a Federal Gambling Stamp? If yes,'explain in detail below, ❑ YES NO State/Federal: Year City: I State: Stale/Federal: Year: City: State: 30.Military Service:(branch) Fr: To: Serial No.: Type of Discharge: None 31.List all addresses whore you have lived for the feat five yews.(Attach separate sheet if necessary) Street and Number City,State,Lc. From: i To: 6769 WCR 32 Longmont, CO 80501 1962 Present] 72.Ludt all former employers or businesses engaged in within de last five years.(Attach separate sheets if repass .) Neme of employer:- Address:(street,number.deb state,zip) Poston Held: I From: I To: Quest R. & I. Ltd. , 4322 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 President I 1980 Present Seminar Sklar Financial Cant. ISan Mateo, CA - . I Leader 1987 Present Furrow Restaurant 4322 Hwy 66, Longmont, CO 80501 Manager 1985 1987 33.List the names eM attach letters of recommendation Nom three persons who awl vouch for your gaud character and fitness in connection with this application. Name of reference: I Address:(sweet,number,city,state,zip) No.of Years Known: 115428 WCR 19 Shirlee Davis otar_tooi11e. rO 20651 15 years 4531 WCR 32 Anita bones Longmont, CO 80501 5 years 13865 Hwy 66 Diana Bassett Longmont, CO 80501 4 years OATH OF APPLICANT /declare under penalty of pery'ury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all information therein is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Sinpawe: 'Taw Date: � Treasurer, Director U C, I and Shareholder —2—I 890371 • � To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Karen Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, Address: / s t' 2_ Y e u / fe n,,.mot p._ � o 890371 • • • To Whom It May Concern: I have been acquainted with Karen Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, Art4la. /atria., Address: y53 / - c. .1'a. 3 A L. cr;,e.fl& &- . c.4 Yo �`'d , 890371 To Whom It May Concern : I have been acquainted with Karen Sekich for not less than ten years on a personal as well as business relationship. Based upon that acquaintance it is my belief that she is of good moral character and will fairly and honestly deal with the public , business partners and all state and local regulatory authorities. It is also my opinion that Mrs . Sekich is qualified to own and operate this business and would recommend that you grant the requested license. Very truly yours, o\OI Address: 890371 (J. C�1 -M / O i \x, / ' GSA), . STATE . ,�� ! RAMC 187 DEPARTMENT OF STATE CERTIFICATE S. NATALIE MEYER. Secretary of State of the State of Colorado hereby certify that the prerequisites for the issuance of this certificate have been fulfilled in compli- ance with law and are found to Conform to law. Accordingly, the undersigned, by virtue of the authority vested in me by law, hereby Issues A CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO THE flRROw CORPORATION. Dated: NOVEMBER 29, 1988 (1:9A-LC-1 SECRETARY OF STATE • • 890371 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION - • OF THE FURROW CORPORATION THE: UNDERSIGNED, a natural person of the age of eighteen years; or more, , for the purpose of forming a corporation under the laws Of the State of Colorado, adopt the following Articles of Incorporation for such corporation: ARTICLE I NAME The name of the corporation is The Furrow Corporation. ARTICLE II PERIOD OF DURATION The duration of the corporation shall be perpetual. ARTICLE III PURPOSES The purpose for which the corporation is organized is to transact all lawful business for which corporations may be incorporated pursuant to the Colorado Corporation Code. ARTICLE IV POWERS The corporation shall have and may exercise any and all powers granted to corporations under the Colorado Corporation Code as the same may from' time to time be amended. ARTICLE V AUTHORIZED SHARES r of shares which erthe corporatOiont shall have authority to issue is fifty million (50, 000,000) shares of common stock, without par value. SECTION 2. Voting, Every holder of common stock of the corporation shall be entitled to one vote for each share of stock -standing in his name on the books of the corporation and entitled to vote. Cumulative voting shall not be allowed in the election of directors or for any other purpose. SECTION 3. Pre-emotive Rights. The shareholders shall have no pre-emptive rights to acquire additional or treasury shares of the corporation or securities convertible into shares or stock, purchase warrants or privileges. 1 590371 vrr 2 SECTION 4 . Transfer of Stock. The corporation may have ' the right by appropriate action to impose restrictions upon the transfer of any shares of its common stock, or any interest therein , from time to time issued , provided that such restrictions or notice thereof, shall be set forth upon the face of the certificates representing such shares of common stock. SECTION 5 . Liquidation . The Board of Directors may from time to time distribute to the shareholders in partial liquidation , out of stated capital , or capital surplus of the corporation , a portion of its assets , in cash or property , subject to the limitations contained in the statutes of the State of Colorado. ARTICLE VI REGULATION OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS SECTION 7 . General Management . The general management of the affairs of the corporation shall be exercised by a Board of Directors. SECTION 2. The Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall have the power to make, alter, amend or repeal the By-Laws , but any By-Law so made may be altered , amended or repealed by such vote as established in the By-Laws. SECTION 3. Contracts with Directors. No contract or other transaction of the corporation with any other person , firm or Corporation , or in which this corporation is interested, shall be affected or invalidated by: (a) The fact that any one or more of the directors or officers of this corporation is interested in or is a director or officer of another corporation ; or ( b) The fact that any director or officer , individually or jointly with others , may be a party to or may be interested in any such contract or transaction. Each person who may become a director or officer of the corporation is hereby relieved from any liability that might otherwise arise by reason of his contracting with the corporation for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of any firm or corporation in which he may be in any way interested. SECTION 4. Quorum. At all meetings of the shareholders, a majority of the shares entitled to vote at represented in person or by proxy shall constitute a q such meeting quorum, ARTICLE VII INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS Pursuant to Section 7-3- i01 . 5 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, each Director, Officer, Employee or Agent of the Corporation (and his heirs , executors and administrators) 2 890371 • • shall be indemnified by the Corporation against expenses reasonably incurred by or imposed upon him in connection with or arising out of any action, suit or proceeding in which he may be involved or to which he may be made a party by reason of his being or having been a Director, Officer , Employee or Agent of the Corporation, or at its request , of any other corporation of which it is a shareholder or creditor and from which he is not entitled to be indemnified (whether or not he continues to be a director or officer at the time of imposing or incurring such expenses ) , to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of Colorado, as they exist or may hereafter be amended, including in circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary under Colorado law, in accordance with and subject to the limitations which may be contained in the bylaws of the corporation from time to time in effect. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of other rights to which he may be entitled under applicable state statutes. ARTICLE LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY (DIRECTORS) Directors of the corporation shall have no personal liability to the corporation for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty as a Director. Nothing contained herein shall be construed , however, to eliminate or limit the liability of a Director to the corporation for monetary damages for a breach of the Director ' s duty of loyalty to the corporation ; acts or omissions not made in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; acts specified in C. R.S. 7-24-111 , as amended ; or from any transaction for which the Director derived an improper personal benefit. ARTICLE IX REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT SECTION 1 . Registered Office . The address of the initial registered office of the corporation is 1011 Eleventh Avenue , Greeley, CO 80631 . .._ . SECTION 2 . Registered Agent. The name of the initial registered agent of the corporation at such address is George H. Ottenhoff. ARTICLE X BOARD OF DIRECTORS SECTION 1 . Number. The number of Directors constituting the Board of Directors shall be fixed in the manner provided by the By-laws of the corporation , provided, that if the number of Shareholders of record is fewer than three the number of Directors will be the same as the number of Shareholders. 3 890371 • • SECTION 2. Initial Directors. The name and address of the initial directors are as follows: Fred Sekich 4322 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Nick Sekich, Jr. 4322 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Donna Sekich 4322 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Karen Sekich 4322 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 ARTICLE XI INCORPORATOR SECTION 1 . Name and Address. The name and address of the incorporator of the corporation is as follows : George H . Ottenhoff, 1011 Eleventh Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I , the undersigned , being a natural person over the age of eighteen years , being the incorporator designated in Article XI of the foregoing Articles of Incorporation, have executed said A les of I or ion as of this p,$ day of November, 1988. r enhoff STATE OF COLORADO ) / COUNTY OF WELD ) ss. I , Elaine Neisler, a notary public in and for the County of Weld and State of Colorado, - do hereby certify that George H. Ottenhoff, who is personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Articles of Incorporation , appeared before me this day in person and upon oath swore to the truth of the facts therein stated and acknowledged that he signed and delivered said instrument of writing as his freg and voluntary act. Witness my hand and official seal. +My_Commission Expires: , fUi4 Q5 / 99a, v -tra vni• is 0 1.4 Ob , Notary 330371 4 s • •, MINUTES OF FIRST MEETING OF THE FURROW CORPORATION The organization meeting of The Furrow Corporation was held at 10: 00 o'clock a.m. , on November 28, 1988 , at 4322 Highway 66 , Longmont , Colorado . pursuant to written Notice and Waiver of Notice of the meting signed by the initial Board of Directors , Fred Sekich , Nick Sekich, Jr. , Donna Sekich and Karen Sekich, who were present. Also present were Conrad Dale Hopp and Martha Ann Hopp. Nick Sekich , Jr. was elected chairman of the meeting and Donna Sekich , secretary . Said individuals accepted their respective offices and proceeded with the discharge of their duties. The secretary presented to the meeting a written Notice and Waiver of Notice of the meeting, signed by the initial Board of Directors of the corporation. On motion duly made and seconded, it was ordered that such Notice and Waiver be filed with these minutes. The chairman reported that the Articles of Incorporation were sent to the Secretary of State on November 18 , 1988 . The chairman ordered that a copy of the Articles of Incorporation be inserted in the corporate record book when they are returned by the Secretary of State. The secretary then presented to the meeting a proposed form of By-Laws for the regulation of the affairs of the corporation . The By-Laws were read and discussed, article by article, and upon motion duly made and seconded , they were unanimously adopted as the By-Laws of the corporation and that the secretary be authorized and directed to execute a certificate of adoption of these By-Laws , to insert them in the corporations' minute book and to see that a copy is kept at the corporation 's principal office for the transaction of its business. The chairman then stated that the next order of business was the election of a Board of Directors to hold office until the first annual meeting of shareholders . Nick Sekich, Jr. , Fred Sekich, Donna Sekich, Karen Sekich, Conrad Dale Hopp and Martha Ann Hopp were duly nominated . There were no other nominations and on motion duly made and seconded , said nominees were duly elected as Directors of the corporation until the first annual meeting of shareholders. The Board then proceeded to elect officers for the corporation and the following persons were elected to the offices indicated next to their names: President Conrad Dale Hopp Vice President Nick Sekich, Jr. Secretary Donna Sekich 89"3'71 Treasurer Karen Sekich 1 a ® o Each elected officer who was present accepted his office, and the President then presided at the meeting as Chairman and the Secretary acted as Secretary. The Secretary presented to the Board for its approval a proposed corporate seal , an impression of which is hereafter affixed , and the same was adopted as the corporate seal of the corporation. The Chairman next informed the Board that , to provide capital for incorporation, it would be necessary to offer , sell and issue stock . On motion duly made and seconded , it was ordered that 30, 000 shares of common stock be issued to the following: Nick Sekich, Jr. 5,000 shares Fred Sekich 5,000 shares Donna Sekich 5 ,000 shares Karen Sekich 5 ,000 shares Conrad Dale Hopp 5,000 shares Martha Ann Hopp 5,000 shares The next order of business was the selection of a depositary for the corporation 's funds and upon motion duly made and seconded , it was ordered that the President be authorized and empowered to select any bank of his choice as the depositary and that the President determine whether one or two names be authorized and empowered to draw checks on the above depositary, against the account of this corporation and to endorse in the name of this corporation and receive payment of all checks , drafts and commercial papers payable to this corporation, either as payee or endorsee , and that the President be empowered to enter into a corporate resolution with the depositary bank , a copy of said resolution shall then be attached to these minutes. Upon motion duly made and unanimously approved , the President and Secretary of the corporation were authorized to enter into a corporate resolution for borrowing on behalf of the corporation . The President and Secretary were authorized to select any institution of their choice for borrowing. The chairman reported on various actions undertaken in behalf of the corporation for the purpose of commencing the businesses of the corporation. On motion duly made, seconded and unanimously approved, all such actions of the officers , directors and organizers of the corporation were approved. 890371 2 • S The meeting then considered the payment of the expenses of incorporation and organization. The Treasurer was directed to pay all such fees and expenses incurred to date in connection with incorporation and organization. There being no further business to come before the meeting, on motion duly made and seconded, the same was adjourned. Donna Sekich, Secretary 890371 3 1:4,12 S'v'�r X.„,.6lr, JI 4i YyV." r�••' r 1,1 •4•S " .V4.„..r[r" 4,J''A M' U ',1./41:14:0;•.13,(4,16',..... a/^'<S U .I.. .' .:• {\/ �/ /4 ', .;cl" I i r ry ' ,:t l lrt l: a Jl,,IIrti Ni,/ ;+i.vl eM ti. :.4 S 144 te,`kt t 1rtH a {w L :;..j + ' \ fYl(Vi,s,4r'w n iri lil v �/�.1tR:ait 4iY�tL 'i I.1/ 5 W/�4Irwr' 'i::4•r.,v / � v`f �` J I.,I t r,- � 2...4 0,,,,....i.,„• •\� 1 4� 4 li• M1 + . ,C.'V �iM i1 P1. 4.i'A♦ At✓ W. I i f,A `' x � 5 gad ►i4, w o ._. " a. r i,ti.< . _l rt ' `F" I I°r 3 cr - S J f /I . '. •r s t Wirt(� _i„` ... �'. '� YIy l 1 ¢r ) C'Sjc;P� )ai 1 i 3)t: :>ti.Olpld qr.o 1.A> .,,_r, ,� fC'i�°G•Fy12JrriLrlJ•rf.)i,.f�119 >�)Y�:r)�iai'))8F?).y� lip• , . a wt r'/ / . Y 5'0.5,5 Yi r r r0. 1:) i , r . t • � . � of ..i. rif.) )�., Jr�inc+.),.it r ) rr)�!/fir ri)�'�i1�:�J •t+HifG>n> /i�•it 1.;4 . ., t i r 1 Y .. : i / i r.): riim. VT.'S r y \jre.4� 4'491 k l i�rl i J.ufi.nflLaru FG..'+.r'+ u_ a • ou lk ,-saxa w, iii i 2 r�QI� \ � L� \\� ,•� ` I C ` , iiit ' ' j i ! ,, errV r N zii i 1 N 4 13. '..r"i1•," r ''` � • •< 4}� Yr, ``�-'', i I. )ith lx '`� e st 3 H r i. > �4yi�11 iii ii4li I p ' ,+� n ? \`+` o V� d"i'r'Y N..,4;,,,.?k I� , / .h / �w r 3 J 3 \ \ ,1 a 14-, i,t fi n� r` /rr'tF 47:1;4 rr1 D N 1 ! N .A.. I'] Y .._ .�i_. T{. tY yr/ti :✓ Y:5,m;� 4'� \ �� '�\ \`' O - �{+^ v•CI. �4 `�.tirf�*as'L41-'/V-';•....;:.4i i •/ ' 21 \ "Z ,N.Z IN,� N s' Rk 3. „� M � 16 fl s .,W IhW )z. .ry-�I \\ ft V , TA ,, 1, ,--::;)..4,4„,,,.z_ "1 r1/' 4•r" ,ryV LI :A � P, V , Am 4 /i .X11` t'� �l �C � iM? `t �^�'♦A '� �- .� �, ? IIP �1...� �%I �n 4 <� e ... q, ,,,'F•1/4, :-';L ;•.4,,71-,;'^2 . : %` \ j� 14 . ,, , w ,�" ; ; y;JJff ,-...1. 2,,••:• w p �, t 7 V �'" u 1 E' r11/? ,I L S... L. As I I if14 ”,e4.14•1f /''''' eLV) • 1I ;\- '� 1"� I• " 11 DTI '2A' r,. • II IN. + ` lr ri 1 ti'J "% Rs ,,,nr4 ',R fit, 1 ,y�wr i iii \ \ ,R Ii• 1- . )%0%ti . A( nl r li ' ≥' i , l yys`y L• r f r , f I4 CIL cr\t\ J '; r 1 ' . .Ltr i7lb A b'1 ^7 k''' ,1 � . /.,�.i / y.Y' d1ar7 . 1YI '� ll, ti ,��' 1 ^ ILI. ^F' il 1 Y 11 iii D} Ct) a 1 '� \ r,: �, s �� /�� `,gi[�ti by. i)liil. . )l, `JS '�w _ �• r , n es-7\ i1-' ki/y�t)Aun t)fr iF t? \,M:.) tTfl l 14t''""e.' ''' `/ i �l 'mil\ll ^�c(ir� �if %1/4:'::‘,1 • 1�� n �♦� V 11 �I .,fin. u�. k•' 1/4:-..c.;41;yIv . �1 �� v• Y V 1 4.. tli 2/ �I .(/i /;L-rl! �°+;y ,GCnalw�i�y f NI:c '�.�' 7 �' k W"�y i:Y i i d dr?Id if tier:NI:VI"�)i rt l v ,)i 1 � 1 : >" / �•.�`+'��I�t�4 Vk 11:4.4.4. Yu "7 1?Sf?7 i'R7•r7' YZ Y i[i i:UJ ItYtfzlx C+i. ti� I �,••r-/ r •�r• ��' • I Cl.?/".1 44.i AA[4..>f) i )I [! t /4'4,4 i(.rjn •Yhst?+ l I '+..°�.r I r\ Is� r::Y .•) r ){r s. Y,i / Ia la0;1?rf )u i I s3 � , ra 7r r d A[i7> In,`} i(}(ir t�:9dp iA.( J S f iC \I t0/�.Ifi� :4t41.6 J:) IY•i ' i)a' i !✓'1 /[I 1;511 �yflt .r . t _>.......>....i.�: •« '>r '.�>'r��...vv >' 1"I a 4 l\ y 1' V y2'4 .f't M+4 Tr l•[�,. N 1 �`.` .(y '''' �1`�d 44(411Y 4l iv''44'V Y ♦ '` /� , -.` f, ` '.. '� \ vY ...7.,?,,,,li/yl rr, tl..., I .:, 4 Ir i ' $1 r ,x N 0* '�• V r•! t w f I _/yI[ r `, s 11 i`rr ♦ y .y 14 I , sS " r 1 P ♦ i o•I.ti/l,.r W Y .4r♦/ v ' I ti 4 , v1' ,1 M fo . J. ♦ ' •/ / ^'� :'1 • 890371 I I ii �I "�' i`�''\ I,�'�I LL- �' SI / 1 lVA�++ 1`�`�i I tH-v<\I %. �� Tr`,L. . /'r`.„ .... �! ,r _ ,'II , ,. ;� 1 u wit`WY/ P n i.. . ., Nr r,V ,✓'gyp w,a �' 1... > , i/f r. ! �, ,f''/ -. !>'i&r//Il '2+,3104,,• t L� ei 4-r • . rl \ 11 ar• r'L 1 1,t r /'",'W }f'f41::il, A",' r i y,,,, • ,, • �. . //q q.// V � '1;,;44., ✓' F , , r /• •S.." 't N $4 r L yr /I(. 1 1 4 r �. (` d.;',...;.,-...‘.;'{ ' , • \ r(L'� ..y.t b+'iiYro. /i "\' 1.{° f. •` N','„Ai /w r } , ,.1:,\�.�`ir c'; x i 1iIr �*�?yN • �i. 4t" ' ' 'tl )'A., ) .r •./:) , \y ' ., r ) 1 ,;� .._r\YM 5ry .,y.cd :::,....1,7t.,-;-:/T , \�i1 �,;� lr11 ) 11;iii { 1 f ) J ) L9 f ).1 7� iji • _j n \..I' 1 )J I iFl t ) a) I f';•,•:; . r !r f r f 7 1 �'{ itaC [l t. r + 1 /1 . .n . .If ). L. . • r..0. ' y ,r r ! .t� • O*'.}•;',11.l'1)vr14fb1 rr.v'L.-)r1',ih 1{ll t It).•L'. 1' .1" 1 _ i.Q/y tka. T 1 .� , Y7�hl�l I••,4 I.r 1 . > ) ) ) 2'• r44 /J 1 • . afazAj: �t1}��%��.tFK w�4 t)�}Yf )If '"sry".1.��H.eass.A 1:1_•,.a) rit-‘4) t r� 'r 8'/ ?( iY �� _ ,ar+ O aLnw� •Lrlt)ir.4 • I ' Y)Y• '.ti ri ` r .')•I '` "Y i � .''s s II.Z i<, '' �7 Yn A• j1 �.IJ t r,� r) L111 �))li ). O) . ' ti m Vet. 7 (, Aj • k +++((( s ' v L• . .a4 s 1 �1 .ri v I 1.�1 o-1 I \ 'Yai. . rz;Wsl P lY Lan 1, 1k - $, rl /,',l, }., II I r ti �. r1. 0:::;•,,) 1I L ) 21--f /M,r •R I.%:''' �' a Nkc• �'-n • it ri' t /�I ID• a � , `A p •sir:,' ;42,1'.'.��`�I�� ,,. ▪,��7 'fij r+pewl L r , 7 p. 2. '\y -t 'ice 4�`r bi •10. n l `W 1 'ail j , tni :ill R\4 w� C s1 (n 'w et,11;•i,,� t:.' .+-. 1.₹: R4lr fur•,• ,r 1 ;.;.^ h+ '\ -, k 01 .17 CN'� 'I`_ p "t4 ,' I It'll!'" ,, \,. ..::::!,t„.-."/„,,, 'Figf aw 4 4.4.•t• r' Gl l.. J \\ �` is -Nil . �'. r !I Svt(a,.r . i• ) . ?Y•! (:0 \ 1 \ \ �' r4 ad111 y ` .y, ?� ry' �°1L1+1.r 11 V ny ?Al /aL �. / ', \ ., • N n o, o k " ' 'k a . , � ,` L�r(I I�/)��zjyt/I ` !� , �y m �.'r IO o �. qv, w jr \y .F tr/�' "I,X'� \ 1 ni It �I a ^ ~ v♦ y.'•1. ry HI �� r f ,r,,,,:;°`"•-r,\ �� \� a' ��`' •. ., 1 F,. , '2 r".W bid f ( r'N.�,y.ww ( 1 i . • �'V 1 0 MI a a� N I S +' -:. , "y \y" ..� ,. cam\ \V ; ' @Q, 9 k �+a �.y lS� U "Weill ;(�( SX ' \4r.ti/ or,r,'lc l� i i r }pit �\ I � C k1 .7i n C▪ I '�AV n� Ali � I ' ^f '�'�.8 .P�` t �•• a Q�s ^) k a I o4 ft t4A''�.{srlYir t{t.\ �t2•, � I ^• �'� `�• % N. 1 �•',�we,{,, Irye ' k -` /i �j C\'r4$,. .4;11. \/ , `\ ti `\' 1 I w { 'r t1" / . , :;f..:11;:',4. '. r,,.r(ri{Jr11TLf11'. 'II ;L � V �L fN of ,I (lam /-��'�rY� / :R~f' -ac j I L. . qF t�..C� \,A" �� +,�r�I�,�MW+l S i'�fj ,j j+Y7!/,�4iiC/,Au• C,i..• T , ;�'1 ', 1 •, •\ y N.V "I"I14 / v"«�i III te ,..0,44.',0,-10.7,'M .'rI r i \ ; ^N \ , • I, I4, �a , ...sh.. . s,: i{°"+ .)f1 , I „III i aa,:4 s�x �'a... . . s I •V c 1 r' V • • ' icy a.�ryf t \ t ham i.. . �)� �. • V 1 �,y/ azJ �+,�'� ,"₹i VY4c )� brl j n'V• '� �. �' +d�r 7 I O�.n tMB�'+' - `'I/..tl.' i'..A. 11_ JJl ""h1 4,t. 4" ,yaVA 4�ti• � I I , 1•t\Pq+`aa .` ) �iri!^Illyir Virr ,ii`-.jf^`-.}IIe rr�4 .�f4a Lis _CP.. '/r•[ L \ M ,. SztS.,.i.,,WIP:$1.41L:ic;:tiliTcMg/it.ii?;;;•.tV:7.,A;.;;;iii lV'i / lifer ) rJJ )v9Crl >i 6.'▪ ` ,i-Y+'r'.w' • Fv) ) I,J } ruh . Yt) .PtI. St. . . ii( n4 , .� s �+IL r Ws . ) )..4,0,,-,no .1 r ) r .. ! C (L is FY �a • i'v'''''aY ♦ l . r . , 1 n a n . 1 \)tits . i' •\C / /+riN°s+,.x rd :s)• ) ) kt' /,r jhv L2 uif_a.a . : r w.a {,ILL\ -., ,Q y, + ��{ ,,,Lj N„g47r.9i/Lx `GTr ,tl•'.\ yi,dih Ai'''\▪' °w Jv rr�Wr`G v'�•C7,. VVr�r' :7'A.� �+�-w,.t +tVd �. +,N '�. IG'f� �iU\W', `•1',"(;:::::;,''')):4,N44 li�L j /..se Y ,.,^N�r1.%.' r4 .i.ir`"v•va"r N�+�'� s4�ixt•r ry 5� „ •'t' : ,w +• r/'' ti tl -�." y 7 f !✓ 4L dyy yy .. / / r' I r L. . t .. /! i•L .. 'Y'''''''''''',::4:1:r ,` a ♦ wu.:,:.ti'.; ': yJ\ 4' ,• ...., � . './' rte/ 1 1 \\2 ' 4✓4rli , u .. r \y. �t ys 4;:g4','" l" t - nM • / . u Y �r '4 / y aq r/ /y it'" r I I 1 i rJ v t1 + �t , V ! 4 t .W ` e 4 01 V ° '$ I\t., r v 4. dYf.y.A(l I F I , 4 1 r J r !k Y. i , '.�' \ !!'0:N:',9:`;'`;`;`. ) 1 it 4 l + J r4p -\ r.n 4 x!_:' , 1 t _'x L 1 l k .,,,,...54;„„.2,..,„,,,,, / h \• to i` Wfi ,� 1t +-01� rr ip Jj � I+�1vlt r. NII r"i�r �.\ty riW tt 1 �� _+ A ti • •4 t , v t ! x rf k n 1� 4 r+♦f. ., n .1116r lL ”. -a x f aJ \._` .`r !n\ � a\r`� i', H\iif r ° + :.`VN�° »t� ,t� rl�%:�' +tf�3`�Jlf�_ / '”:":`,,A,-.!2%* \_�• \t,U•1+>, Y\ )r 1 rl 11 r1•t 1 ilr •r11 11)1 111)1r i:1 i a , ,0 J �. . —. .... .. v� 5r, �. I w•••:;•:-,.,...F.: r )7 1;;,;••,•• ? )79 d .(/ /.. � / ,......0.,,.;e: -•, L(j A ri!•f 3 i r 7 i Y r z;i 5;•:.••;•,,,, ) irp i) •.r Y 1 s y ,( a r ) / 4t , : - . 1_ p1 ♦N`S ♦1J ) 11 + . 1 } .f iy)"f ti$4, .hC+ld { � 4 � 1 I 1 !n .. ) 1rN 1 r11 '1.'` 1�. 14 .. r ') r t:17 1 i 1 •-,a - r ll -R, N l Y )'i v i ''''''- -C4417`''''...y1 7 1 4214.1?.2_ILJ.a.at. .lL.fa L ic.isl'a IVAICINS) r.+ 'l.' ,11 - i`N 1 . /i�U6+�F 131(.6 11 vl1 II V •y 1 1 \•iw` i, A4 ,1 ` ,,1�l p I,V't f/� � i ,� ,�+a;sw , r �1� �'4, A ` a (�1 �I 1:0-7. t Aa't 4 ,,w p d y 2:1rt l t "1 .!I y_`-1c1 it 4Z I C `A N y:r WIr,II a P�l.7 I,• ,... n y ` \J.,, {Nl r { tr cy • it if.::; :,,,H I� ^` p\ ''/.J+ ixuftL ' 1:. 1 r?1iI \ �r % \ \ DM •—• Ik uflt" 1 I �iaal/..'.4 1, I i, 1 II 17 Q ; . \ N ;'?� r (D r• ` \ ^ '. WII hI� {6. rb- ",Jn�l h V 1 it ' 't 1r tln I h{ ` C •• `• I VI e�ri 2* 17.11 ,J�r.�. / ,✓ _\ o„ rl 1 'A /1'i N �,1• N. V N. � O��r �a�i� �. ' +'J it % ;I J J w lone . w \ 1 ff 1 9` l a i e I 1. 1r � j V key % s dip. D i A A, o (� i,� "° ; r'i \11 6) � \ ��\ S ,O °l:fr.r > •.S4 ii'i\•�� v Il �.. • �+ r y!, ''•' n4 \ rS 7 [ © , Y1 iL r' ,�,i. _ 1 p I(1!{t,, Cn✓kA...1 ? JJ1enr, w 1 . ..N.1 Nl .jV 'Iv fD iP s., Z 1 .�A, 4 a Ill; • a 0 V\� s`Ni J t,i /� N j 't.�. N`. m o f n w • ri�,r ^ k{� •� .1 eiill i. \ q�(` Nryi\ a� A• ��\> 'V � '7.` �b f+ "" ;;C:..^ Ir / ‘! �'tp�.. o :1 I �.� ti ;:;!..,-7•,/,../..5,, • ,C`;_ J ! • Ian" " A, ' 'lieu .1 f..� 1 ! • •SSecr4tvir�. '' ".'S1 * 1 `'j�A\ R IrI" '„ +r` ` 1 "'ys�r'1w',. � f\y� .`•"1, , LC; „1 ! 7 I fie, ',;¢ i w� yi O 677 0 .I .ii 1 F J lA 4.. 1l 1 -� �1 I rM, A #y `k 1i .ti+I {f1r11 �t 1� -t_'� •\V �j 1 W 1 ' ,U • • .4$1%r e7� i's I !( y d r r 1 :�`r a \�V It \ IC i� tl I -. r ".' Sp a,rt 1 1 h1 1. j ", s p 1, Y . • d1t \As il 1/ A r 1 '71 �/ (`" -, i'Cie▪ �4nk I I1,.:\% '.?�^ �y '� vim „ IIf ib�l, s/y` \h I 1`1,414:4,..: v I /•tl ) . ' a ` \ °`Fft/' .I !-gym w ,n` �54�"'% d M'H 1 �s1:� 4Kp\ I i%rt TJ�\� '�\ ` ^ �� 1 %)1,.. vJ •'O`A `'.•"d, j "..4:112:1!):11., s! $ a a+I ',, \'�• .r V '� '\ wy;�$,I�y} A 4. M1IWei 1• I '1 O � • Pi�4i1^ i in + 1 -,:„..- 1,,,,,7.7-0..n., ,.r ' .r. .J1',19ta*f•(t1ii ••q rrd r ) i vJ OKf) f'Y .. 4 1..�.� , '\h, .. 'i ;%';';',..i";•4 ;4 i•A )t1 { 1' r i �a Sf 1 , d.' 1 d ♦ 4,V ti r f r )b I i . S i N, § > y d 1, ?c11117 .iudr rnl / �M s ir7I •.% ;4:1',4-'4 rll + if rY y.L F/7 f t Lis s f . , 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 . ,,r / .N .. 111yr31 f 1 i'4 1k .4.;t r• '..S1 1 3 7 f y ) ) ) ) / .1 1 1 ) .)J' r 1(r f1 1 l( . / ,r 4 \. � u , u�.a-i. a>z i 3 ♦',111 t s r �/ t•C--'-.... 'VI.��/�/ }I`I� r 1/ ry\ 1y v tfi !'�R�\G. r, )fttlY Gtr '4•W'rn Yfe `'� 'fYwt(Y}�,w�A4."\ �y/++<`vjjy , .6.0-7-•;,f ,yi ll., ` r !'41 t I i , 0;1 ` 4' 4•7 11♦ r11r,r ! 1y'`44-retx r W Yr x I� Y t , i1)rbA 7 _ 0 1 T x" u xr.V u x n8 4 p+' l ,t i v ! 1r�w tl J% nr tl • /,/ 3 ♦ 4 ) ! C. 1 !u ,%; '\+ 1 r/ � \ 11111'!\I� wv r i�•4i(y S� w .M 1t1 � ';',.1:;/'...:or , r ! V � J / J 1. r• "i.;.. a 1 4 1 ,T rt",l, + ,4 J5 `<OY :: 1 4'IlVy�d.,r, w N'w/1 •i �/ 890371 Ilx.,—...,,,,,;„:,,,,,v„,;,,,.... .., t C ,4 f i 1� ♦1 .rd /0'.%.4.k l!h'• .4,:. ✓ rd e • �+i x (' , c i5 i '".. U+•Cn,i( r•,� a Nip�,�[r� rr d tiV'b ./ 9tia j ( t ,N .....,..{,. .,,!,:i„...,tI i s .„,.,A,,,,,::,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, W lz' i(' } 'P W wJo s ,,,, i „N 1. ��rf,,,,1;0,...,1.k.11/...• .. ! v 1 ! , .dal +,v;;;• r lSlAyaM { t0 Aer. er-'10rr lh uFyy'te` • �wi,` A I. 1, �7'el+n ,• x,.. , °� l r w 'ra, m•t f ! '[▪ ..I'',4'11/4:040i ,v&;i t' n +- 1 y r.,?„. ra f 4<iiS�: no rri,. 1;.?.;ta ,,. M1\%W+ L 4°f_ ,:',w. r� w'- a .,Ni ^ r'to,rtl ,- ,..4049 l '. \\s\µ3`a n„ !• ,LJ , ) i+ rrrrl',•, )C� IydVI.I , illet`R).0`� -._ I , °1 +, �a ` ))I ) It ,ja li ,si4 }) !'',‘,41:1;S .40 ) Ae „ >%1 'Y ; i� V ( .1�• I 'Y+ )ti•Y; 1Ce , rrr , ! ,q / 1?YYClU7:•/ ) r 7i)i lilt 1 ) r it q':, y f i r.• 7 t 1 • t , ,•1 rd , + rYy rJ � 1 1'1k1/44\1 .i•i i •••S ,JUlu r� .L4 1.�� .,, ,:,� h ' ' GT'� 7>anrp/ s!, ,r { fh • IL�SI ya l ' 7 .,;,,;,!„ , ;,,„,c, ..40.,,;(1,.,,z.„..te:::.., tV"r'+�tau Ir 1 / ,?v ,s;:_%,..,_ ns .... N• ..r,.� N r u Lodi ml] � �✓ ��_ 1 tY:: rq �I.ffIl•�i t,.�l V• .r , ,, '� I al �y�i y 5•(I' ; I 't ' .`;- i rr -,`+V l,4 '",.',:k•I`� Ir.( .. \ > '~ ' I vv. :4,,,,,,,,:„..'• hpY ,l lW �� Y ski sir,i.w+G&6 a t 1:14 rzzJ�1 � •-•=•:.; k.: � i 3 c"+✓ :107,: Ii 1 ✓ -it t I t tiY• � s cs ✓") `'. ,,, ! ,, * \ 'N I r sr fin: • +!� -•r ' gr,+`i•4 I• 'I r} )•,.I S'3 ` `V `^ I0, ^3 ""N" "+rr'nr (+t�,`'..�!i �•r r i I �� b' ,'",rZ. �V '+r � ,.,;.z N., i I • I .I t0 •♦ n •♦. ' Lti P ry s y� �_" "1 K • r g / /l✓. ...„1 Iltwlfl • �. ` `; • (��{!I �t....r. �'A,' dl I.,�s1,-. t. ,,, I s •` a• Or , r1,]l ‘4, �' 1 V `•,. O�.^e c+''N N r� {� ✓h � , `} , -, n : t l', N - zi \ L .-ti. 1„,,,..::.= L C /� ., ,I �, • p " /� '\ Iy/ s* II + • 1� � ♦ 1 1• ^ V 10 1v C19i � � y{'J%� 1 ' ,1, I .I W ♦., -� ti' ? , pt +'Y uM n 4, i i I t sI1: �3V'� l • co ! '� �\ j ID I o �.'n • �i �s.l' f r IAr .l f C ` ilt//dlin/'♦1.11 �� ry` • —gull ttz: � -,-...--.,•.7-� /�/;�^� \ .%1/4 • 1\ N` . , I " `L• C Pc. " 'r aye i::•', '�:A` -I IE;j V•'^..1 ti�� !✓'.� r l ,♦ `.NI. ]�I 1 i. 7 y,HJ!� r ` 'T• o ;I E;`�'. r ,` O t.""4"...::24!"�la.w)� ' ''''''''"•;:77 ,,. ; :j*i 1.: `` :� ; gf r •\ II .. ^ 1 6' �)It v'' wl.• 1 *ry:'IM " r ,'�I lit 1111�°r 5{� • R ! i -1 ,N,. \,, �, \' ra ' NI, 1 O.l"�r ( ) .fir ,.y,1 mis/ r1rVy/-' -. rr l.• ,1 • l*1 \�,v � I : }"')N ,}:tell 44.► 1,..r"� �'M4r;�".?cos"; +••••R 1,:; I I y�,. rV l rr 8'in aqy . + 11 I •kt•"h k 1A; � ''�4g}s,Y� 'r l{',� jf+;l 1 ^, 1/4., ,"Atljl " '' I1/4-._ ..,1/2) s Gsl•Axd I • ,+1 111. ♦ '♦ v • yr r' , L 1 j M'trN� 1 t J� V N. �R'1� LT$C ie!dry,i 'a+A '♦ :040,, •4.Wrol,•, I . , dd;'i.L4 P • .. .I Q , "V '♦ Nr^ rI .w'w .. t t 3! ag r pa, - �'\� v ,,,,,t0;,;,„..„2:::: ^ r vY.K rh r � Y�* , 1 f.1 • ♦ p 7 C w ..ems-1�� r .- e q P,� ,al '�• '�• �^c' '`� t. :::,1,;,":",1:1",4,,,,.:-. '�"AIM �!� • G,, r {n t se p.;;;, 0. ,•••N ••i •l t^.I •• \\ ' `\ •1,00, i II .' se,ic"','r Y • }� ,i;I ,,,,,,•..„.. itlik A 1 • I'Ir, a•1nllr�?s t�n•''1r�f)}'r •Yt fiat -try; w —C) �w.Y�w .� S / t , .! r(, r .,t ) ! y{s ♦ ry; Cey.,.� ,O r r r 1 X i , C ,l C.1 • • i ) ty • I - r , i +tR , rY \u.A�/ frr r,++ ✓'J ,i ylilrlraLul1+1 r , , I`� 3s .f.lf: •� i.[a\ /tenS\ r(' u ! rV�\ N��\ !`,y 4•°J! d �.r ,7.1ry `/1' aalN 'J j. 4 -.�'♦s iki elty}11i n i' ' S`yt\� rlry, r.• y ?y ✓Y� Ir el{1,i,rw l w r '"� Yi�-wY9f ,• 7+ °ti J.t .j !1r✓,�• '"I If l].:?10.41-7.7.; y11 +,.v , I! «L �1 dlI • II vY/.IilI r O _I 9r.4I w' / i� F Zrt7 ..i.rfwd !f I ! r .a' ly • i • �i ! 4• ,, otv V '. ✓ + O C V L ',I w 1 V u p I' ♦ • !/-: • r v! ,rr1• •} r 5 y i Y R f f- �' i�.t< r , l\I,. , I/•r �' •%•:::1).4:7.4''tY • , ` I W . 1 Y. N ,H✓ ol✓ '. 1 ! / � ✓ J P . ✓ Y'M '�' ! yY-WJ 1 , 1 \ •. ` 890371 'r.,r 11L, \ j(h r `�1L4 rfr r �� `•�� ■ 2;` 'R' �T'' /ytATlwc * �lfr �, � F. 1 ✓`� `%r, ,_� �r 'r j, % ''- ), ;MI,. al .y.i + s^.. r` J qtx� f4,„1,':1;,/,A ,Yly. ,�•.x :4 .rti_ ,1 0 a ♦, ' r ✓a y\� '�f,. li /1Y:yry t v F J'rr t iLr ; .WSy Z1W y i; 1. :wwtN ,../ z.:(;,,,,.. r r + f/ + `+ 1 1 � F l )1 f /rY1Jr r . 4 a r J / .r /{ f J f J v �, r , � ,r'41 S .14 4J ' , 4. h.i�` Ftr v, \ N4�ry�kvf\ ...;S-..)..,.. :4"..y ^ F{y r n4.44,V1/4-4''4,-2// { v rr C/4;!', ' r th L + lw . ,a �, iJl % kI. r.r.,14:'...,,'41,15,,' 1 ...y.\'S .+ f. Y r ,. vfr y { 4Qvi , n,Y r � ,Jn v e a Y r h" w p , r . V .r + ri RlP � 1t ra.r .v yva� nfv r My Q`lyr 1v , 'jw 'S v .Y-12'• � � ..i•n1: v. ,• .;„.„1 .'c'•'•'''$>,-.1.- . �.•.f h}Y`YA�w<, . M\./'TY al h f�M•YM 1�Y M h. t: 1J M P ,1�1�, r r iyv • inrrAt � + w d, 'F r>r -r W. \ L R, 'rLi...• w " j 3'�rr \ ;:a4:74^.1•14...:::‘: ,; - \i,P\"';^ ,-.1.-4. -rN')Ol Jttit) t:;31:ly);g1;cTll',121 ___._._-__ Qt 1/4 4 tv'l? r cs� x arr , 3 w,r 1:.t:Yem49,b•t•,,;•,..7`,11/4”N C�" �'4 s.�r/ Virrl �Y� �� P..t � ti ,7 y�S l II l r Jf l'11f .fV !.::a `Y !!v 1� •N 'Nib C - i :,Ii t5fj� l/Ik �l,lI y1 �L -r I9 F ��f, •� 1 Itr;\ te1atl ` , '�I Y II r "4t1t. x aft - �r 1 �� igitzN • / S4S"4Nyp I!lIW `I''r, it!!!{ O \� L \ \ y ri• t 'Ir. � ', �1r/� _�:,.�\ •\ 4v` • r ,iI (D >-\ "S. W V )II `J „ i\Yf r�r l ...� 1l4r V:4 \1 • M P �„ 's'v r I,r ' , (D '\ V ��3 Fr v -'rtr r , i l \ Sr 1 "J�' �y ' n it`J�i •rf /P I ' "r' F • ,v.�l ID \ n '� \ '`� �L11 1.'Lr �1+`il \ti /.I NisiF/T P� "fir Vn N 1 ,� y, 1 kl 1 n ', , 447 �L�... .fag 4 'rI P1/4J C '4 N CIO •ter.. PA', +...mr• ‘VrR'i \ y3 y,,,N .:*.v,;:: ;>�I N \CY' O X . i4,• }�y �n 'h"�' 'I • [ /::,;::::,..,.e.,...:;- :47,:!,,„:•4_40.; Ap rl ` ` •` ti ` iiru p `� rev Ij • .'4' 4-0,,,,, A. ..�v sa ra rr 11 (s \ 1 1 '� p.l �� a '^y et S�kC' I. 4 dc4wl , a b i : , a t yep l$:1 \\ �f .M•, o r 4 " s , >...''.,k"..-4\\ 4.11/4:V,"..41`. . \ w o o: a •aa>v \ IS^' 0 .1 /� ;` 41,'�,/Ps n ,.p • 11 \ -\ Yom. ` tD In VII 1 , .,,i: . `\'4�;{_. ` o i t t� W \ \• %-••• \ ! 11 olpy N / l\ 1 1 � c�i�' f�{ �V'��+ �`7 1 N �+A 7i'�I �r �,' �p �� 9. Itkl,ita.Niadarliiiiill Z., \V 4/ 4 1 s' 1 1 \ � I I li M � i l r 111 r`,� .� 1 '� } A1I I . _ vr.+'c'�W+Ip1i II�� tj �, 7 �\ \• .� "vr ,d'I ... .,1; / �:,,,,,,,,,/,‘„,„.,.^ r \ 1 .•1 a �. 1. .'� �'�+ F M �r I, 31 r. \ tA 1� Wa �j1i ♦'� �. 1 rY I . 4� Ay �yrlll 111 'S v 1411 � 8 II r ' •4•:.' . .vak 1Y^1 )f aY,) f1�. • ro�� 1 �4 °).AY ,`y1 w r 1 ...''' ...% ��`\ �, 't. r el F 0, l b y(;y,.. ' �?i� (�1?,yl ,y�'Y`4y 1/ r.,iµrv. t.,i L C,`��ti idlin>,.. ,1„ ' Y.1I .Q1`.ac �r f'1 ., y �' r, r° �y� + -0 x.11 ,• N ` � �� ‘ E. IlltA"cry ��:1 /j z '� yI /4.1;4,14g.) r I 1 ' •,../y.. fit° t:3}r,r 11 f1.{ �cc\ \� 111,141"IS r . .yr 00 !7 )y 1Y \5�V;" \'V. I,IFull 1 1,�1 f�.v-'�� V Nr`M '~C)rV '�w a \_ " '�4•4, 1w'f'�Iess .leti i vrN 1-4242?".4%‘;,tell �v,..v� w.' r ,� rTy., i� \ • -J h ,� 7 r'"7pA1F1V,u4I I '`ryS! �4/hr -t Fr. Ir C' \ f i74',:)AM0 i1 Nei r 3 . 1 '1` •1440,4:::, n �� v .a J1 f f+ • -ti \ { vy? �i 1�r ntl , �� tI,'I �II °fr �W .eV ,- II . vw •P. ^i'�a ��r)�1[f �S•�•. 1�lta�!`}�IY tP^,'Jr7i rw^.F9 !'i'l•9..P brU !tom �� , ;�4A I ' fn :\\ '5 '•+ r f r'..1 v 2 N ) t Atl.(T b�.ph i `j4 s r 11ti,a919NrrY) rrJryIi77A Y'1'[ \ L./ 1 aTurc+ rirt . - 1^ fri. ,- .t; 1JiT1�.) ' :6� + y •I }-)1.. ! 1 !J0, Y4a -? irr , y , r v.;YnrrTr. 4 lvr i t a'f7Q6af2ki �r tit. s:i)+/)'111t,r i i ni tv, vl 1YAy 1 1. ( \. rf M4 ' ,�✓ tit,•,a.�[ .2'." ♦.. '. ....�aJ.l �tllN i,rl .y1 1 re3 t ' LN L��f} �! ��rrr� t�+�� .�v1 F, w 'y �uvf �}" ' j� v•l , v; P, k,,,,,:L,A,V. .). %a x"11`ri NV' .y.:1140p o ��\ Tv•..r'�f 1+�J\ aaa� yrw_. yl .a-'4,cr/r• II V VHj' I .'• " •4,«' IIF�1/ Iyrlf- }l/ 'MYI y.+AN .4')1Z'4!% 4144 rrhe74 b $4.-1/4'414`4.4W4004$444f 'y , i"r _? ffyY ,„ �, Xti n , r r v i , Y Z. vv nil r�r.. ys. s 1yy.rr \" \'. N•� r � . ,� vV + :.J u C. W 'a.tl \ ,,.y✓�Wu c r V,1i/�W' yi Ywt of .„,;;;:;:.,„,....,,,,,,,:.:•:••4r f ` •s Lr yr ,,•.ii': f '{ +:. Y. ,51{I y / ,.: A�' ..',r \•. • 3 1 P68 .,. ! , ;.::::!::14;:.3:14; . I( ^` \ -"Z:;...../.. /'^� ti."" " 'AId« .k+ y�� v � �G r t"h « a, r .^ r, N M> P } M �" •r d,`' 1 ^r�A !^�� o� 1 wt'..r11n^"• � CR�(n i M5:.,41,44444..0/411.4▪-*.:« A � t,•.,';'1441.,./.!:41?l •4a ' J�"ei'S 4 �4s 41eh r /r r 4''� 4 r r Ir. 1 45. M //.. 1'H ,^(. r\ �h o'%.; w 4�'^d' rl P r 4\,� V ' '''0....54-1/4,*. bi.i 4 ,, ,+3 is ry v 4,-)1� uF flr r 2'_y.,,, "II 4:04v 4(1 1'vn O,A .] v 1 }n, .l': 4.4441*- .w ( �l eA' !. ,r,,. Lr ALy t'r w ♦ ry 444,,.nbF•) rh �tg , r iFrl,.S' - P t 'sn, �. . i\..'''°4 .. ^�y�''",1 M'�w y"a.A!r_ A' °'il?!` 1 "A� Ln ?4�{° y 1^ ..' r /I. M J t' (f!,tnl�fll� •\ .} .7. C c ....o.l h \ i 1 �iY t .r .K < ze.� •. �r44 • ncr r S Sr4C' . .rr {`r,a:4 ( 4rt sCSi} 4 ! 4 rsk1! 4yt.�'r7�,� `}l.' 4 rj 4 4 1.04 4 ♦ s r24 1 pr ii it,4,,,‘:4 r Ct ( IT, 4•y ?qt.• ' . 11,14 4h1 ( P41 .` I1 .. \ 4l ( II j .0.r.p+c� f f.4F 4414 .t r t�', /`' ' 4 '4t t'rre�C:,e,004#0.40.0-44:0.4:4014;�r - Qla.b 0,:I. rIC'C\ 1 : 9i4 w 4 n}}j! ^4 r gym.. i) ! i r V a.r .VVV4t.. 4/tr 1 9 f 3 f! rr r' v f V4H.4•.NVr t:tar / 1)H! ? L3 F• r tz t.. .__ .sue� L,'rL?r'4.J�l,Lw 4,.r c xr41- r 4'1°yt:'+< c ' ww 'W aili`" "•'`� �^ 1 ; • li„ '�i.4 �1,:i ' tr. w FI+1ride 4 r k. 1 C W L � 4 rre? !t/i{ • '� y.�u 1 C �' •(' •:410 r ex gart0ti 1:. '. 40.,1` �' °I'd W II ' 1/4:W' 1/4' 1,W it �, f1 4� ��C �� 44 �. •W ~ ti v 1 ' 1,• C��t�' y • �'r'til v.�'��. ,• `� s it ; 'A', 4.41.,'W. 44,, ..,.Z..., ' '‘.44... \ czt, c.,... 4.,“ :4411 .44,71,04.:;;:f<• ,. -�' n A' �Ii"` 1 I W % I'1 Nr.0 0� �qqo u II44-.147 . G4. r;•�. '.x�" ue , I I ♦ C. 1/4 ti vJ •• 4'�:'4; \%;�z' 'r u AI~ WW, •Z .4..K ,tt 14 1� •� I I I I I? !(v / � t +�yr I Ii: i 9.t; ` p' v„�, �M 'r I / • ▪Aii.4 j v" I•+ ��ilh!O i l§ ! `r'+�.,2•; !4�F., /✓X�,+/9 w S 1 Et I' , t ,, .e w; L a \j `ti I '� "fit)4yn — c '! O •w.x" . w sw I7Y v : "A / jr i+k ,,61,10.',.. I IF i w.. IL , �' r`��_ V 'fi r.' ' �iw � , � • / r ti c , e I � t \( •e,-...\:,0 ...'•\, IH , �t-. %\s . • .w p r 1,,-. d j i L \z- / r/l,.� �1' L' , 7'1 ,t1 rr w �� 4•ti; S;'';• < (411:4t i4 ! N`W ,t 14t.;.;10 � t. 1 1 r�rn{rrt�i.' s 4:,1: rkp, .li Sn h' M" P ••a C \ C W �' .[CyF�,I ri�'r� 'yap "'rirr �,) O � riLP ,.� 4' t 3 •••"I ti. OI C ti, '._ •k N eu I I 1tct f'14� ,1*4.,4 01. i ) `\il_ 7Ci L: . �Ir� HY r+ �`V`, � : 1 11 ywTTJ qti. W4;Sh g '. 'Mr `.. t `•' ' .E f,r til .ti 4.0,..0,,,,9t,;;;".,,4".;1 I ( . ..LLLII V"y'", 1v. . , 'VC 'v &. W S> r 77. I- 0-4 ,Tr '1 IP„&L. ,,,N . {I �In, Sr...r.. CI �� VvN. y.�� fit: Yiltl IAmrn ▪Y 1. IS f 4Stfor r n yy .1),::„) v +S't .�� t Lt II WI.. I h a :fj^�f; .4,-<I A55 14A^ •� ! 1h�n.� I, K+ 3! \ � •\ wN IIbil U4PI hw 4 Iwn}0 II,14::„.1.1I a ♦J+. �i ti \ i W lir; qr f` +`\ .. \ Rer 1 a+ 1 I y, AW 'y 9 .55 vl�4"rJ ( ' 4( a ,«« (� . „....."'"°‘ E" v, \ 1 c.,---.. C Irert r r A Iiag74 Nor .,r� ,te ea4`'!n �'°'" il !+' .1^L «J I �' }++ •� i' t rV 4.1 j %4�Ix'g4 RL yr !i ^ +q" f Ng. >1 �{ V :� ` i,i 4,CC.,1t;Or -dr.. 3 4 �e� .,� .21/2.. W ��;4 �h'C{{7 ��' � i �} r�rr �� M,� '� r ;I:7U; lV/� 1 l•� "1/4\ ,�� i NSik IL} ��4 titd p y v �f `g.f � 4 xPr 1)7);.::::,),:i...3_:.;••(.70,,,,:: ; �• +s ',z_4��3' '.� 4�T6s_i pb4r rf�rfsr yt,',lrjt4f\\ �' N:• 4 3�r ffi {r4N rf{idr'i itAi`t Vii' t�(iH(fulu s(�(1�I ;Jt{i` ! / i fa ��6 e y t �'4�.�Ggl frr�(sft4f( �}�fl�3}i 445G�,�.'t \`� ` e`? ltd r«r,. V.. - - (x+A + Q,.4tk rt{l(t{ 41( r ( •/ ti( p. 1 �wi M4t S a 4 •(“k:4A iT1 or 1 µL4., t;<"v :Lee/ Ayd�43 ^ rc v Sw Zi�y +• V "r +s \t" h r \ ." w« rn A � Y � I � .!t' Y rni' JCM Q1�N�Ap�kY p��'��q M1S Yr1(r •J�( �� 1� Y n'/�\ •lf{VM /Vr� .•:25>''-'‘t:7%. is� p`�i t n n rA M'yw h e��7,J•�4 n'Iin � 1 7(ia ylr ww„rT -C � + d" w. M ��S i,� /!i � I� '�' �, ro >N firer rr�. � / ,�\ m 1 V i rr Sat ✓ P t ' rQ . 'h' irt ,� , rS^ , a,RP 5' 9 « � J ♦ b �'. .. �P rMA'•+y4 E7vQ "kt • '3"U ry V(rrrNr • se ryW A y.f0 fl `'•-y✓r �� x7 Y •„ t �._^ � r...y�Y1 yy::�v ''V`" CS hu fit 4 � 1r'1 � ,:t.,.;;• ,. t • • - • 4/5/89 COPY OF NOTICE MAILED FIRST CLASS TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO P. 0. BOX 758 GREELEY, COIARADO 80632 KENNETH F. LIND, ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 326 GREELEY, CO 80632 890371 P 949 231 424 ( • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL ` 'te_Mw* Ol --/4' '.D %S'L:A%CE COVERAGE PAC Y�.DED • 8 DEIi• Comas hone I irrd 2"wen additional sen eo ltte ere desired. and mpivte 1Nma ....I FCA A•tiN' TwnAL MALL • 3 and 4. !See Reverse) Put yroaurr eddnN in tin"RETURN To"Spam on the morn etdi.FWre to do die AM prevent WS - • �t:erditanbeingrenanadtoirav 1LetGrIr iadde P!r THE FURROW CORPORATION i tot x �s �ars.dusarsevsiaor CONVENIENCE PLUS 1. to wham doc end addressee's.add nt 2. 0 RitStrktid De9viry Ovicharts) Man And 4301HIGHWAY 66 &. Artkie Addressed to: 4. � v LONGMONT, CO 80501 THE FURROW CORPORATION Type of Setvfoe: CONVENIENCE PLUS D worn 4301 HIGHWAY 66 Cerra ws 0 coo. 'Cer ei Fee 4 LONCMONT, CO 80501 Enron Mel O Wittlgre _ I ATr and watts.W eaddress5 r ree or art a and DATE DELNEREA. Restricted Dc very Fee 6;,9+vsaFe AddresseAddressesNedrs,a (Gary It�fJ eat* He ti?n R (t 5,-yew rag L why and Da e Dei Leadred 8. Signature — Agent a Re',rn Rec.M She k%ng ro whom. X Dare. and Adiress el Pe!ver, el "• Otte of DNIVeev '54--- / _ - ! . 1 TOTAL Posla a artl FLCS lill t0 PS Fonn 381i,Mat. 1988 * fAtELP.O. 1588-212-885 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 1 A Pos!ma'F co.Da'e u. y/5/�� N W y o. (�� (AF C LI RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 380 AT WELD COUNTY ROAD 67, WELD COUNTY ROAD 50 , AND U.S. HIGHWAY 34 FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 WORKING DAYS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the Board of. County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS , pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . . local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . . ", and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate , warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 380 be temporarily closed at Weld County Roads 67, Weld County Road 50 , and U.S. Highway 34, with said closure being effective May 10, 1989, for approximately 10 working days, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. 7-130,-7,70 CC 4'� 5D -t i � i 890413 r Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 380 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 15th day of May, A.D. , 1989, nunc pro tunc May 10, 1989. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder , and Clerk to the Board C. c Kirby, Ch irman BY:__--:\4 G79vMc- (1- ,LAL% e Join-on, Pro-Tem Deputy County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner George K"� a 4141 � G�� 0 County AttorneyGot.r 4Ar 3da i • 890413 f Road Crosed !i^ :. ;__. D AI Lead • .. :r: Defog 750 � -.- ' - ' - ��o Road erased - __-:yam4. *lead We so - Y.-- .• tararawerar;r are�: _ Type a barricade. • • •A_r�...__ w/N"kb,' ceast,tr ?-o a d C lose d 0e4ovr Arrow N4s4 Lo ca I 'fro Pf c -:-.:.-7,7-7_ _. fr-, 5-/. 4 y 39 - �a� - Wasec! s/ro fq for road Caasir�c ill„. `� . " ' To .be closed appraxasi• de ty IC cJOrkiny olcys n.4..-w�• `� •TITLE Wood e1QSvvt uuca i o of wc,e 41 c..crt co 0/ ,C,'. guy 39 - SJ YEY er DA cc . DRAWN BY al arr_ DATE c' - r, :a;- mac NM crzrzD BY DATE rH : }• 'r COUNTY ROAD Mgt/9' • A?pRovgo BY COUNTY ENGINEER - ( WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT 07 hi EAG1TrI ',. 3t Y raa.t Li. A • tc m€moRKI®um W I� Clerk to the Board May 10, 1989 �� • Tr. oete George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge � COLORADO Ftom Road Closure Subject: The following roads were closed May 10, 1989 for road construction. They will be closed approximately 10 working days. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 380 at WCR 67 WCR 50 at State Hwy 34 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR SO WCR 67 WCR 380 890413 RESOLUTION RE: REGULATING, WARNING AND GUIDING TRAFFIC DURING THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 31 BETWEEN WELD COUNTY ROADS 88. 75 AND 90 DUE TO AN UNSAFE BRIDGE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 42-4-410 (6) (a) , CRS: " . . .local authorities, with their respective jurisdiction, may for the purpose of road construction and maintenance, temporarily close to through traffic or to all vehicular traffic any highway or portion thereof for a period not to exceed a specified number of work days for project completion and shall, in conjunction with any such road closure establish appropriate detours or provide for an alternative routing of the traffic affected. . . " , and WHEREAS, the Board, pursuant to said statute and upon the basis of traffic and personal investigations, has determined that conditions exist which make it necessary to temporarily close to through traffic and to regulate, warn and guide vehicular traffic on said County roads by posting signs thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, deems it necessary to regulate , warn and guide vehicular traffic on County roads and any intersections thereof, and it hereby authorizes and orders the posting of such traffic control devices as shall be reasonably necessary to regulate, warn and/or guide traffic thereon for the safety of the general public and that said traffic control devices shall conform to the Federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, does declare and establish that Weld County Road 31 between Weld County Roads 88. 75 and 90 be closed, with said closure being effective May 10, 1989, for an indefinite period of time, and further, that standard official traffic control devices shall be erected at said closure giving notice of the restrictions. fDOQj/ ee y�� v0 890414 y Page 2 RE: TEMPORARY CLOSURE - WCR 31 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 15th day of May, A.D. , 1989, nunc pro tune May 10, 1989. tiyA4A^-1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder / and Clerk to the Board C.W. Ki i�\r \by, Ch irman 01� o�6rt� BY: (7216-✓r _n ( 41714t, & ) a dine 7.hnson, Pro-Tem Deputy County Clerk APPEIOVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner - /../Ar °n C _ / r^� George nn County Attorney Coi 890414 f --:: e - A/cg qo -••-.....)-,;:-.:-,...,...-• — /. Type 12 tarn tide -•: - `� bGirif4 ��1�isM- Flasher N - _.- Cal F1aSPer v!-�rM'• l ?' ad O CoSea( -" Del oor Arrow ��rte_".- {—i . sat; -J\ W •— -F.�r....-- FYI . 1• Iz. -- r , pOad e 'osed s/o/cq /2- on sole ' 9 (.3//s4 A) —. - . . �r d e -r:: • To be C!osed ' co h ?; I repairs o r �^P�Ic<P�P.. �— _ _ a Ca H be Pita de .TITLE • od .(14swe wee 3 / oft wet -rW V weft 9' y.' Er BY DAr; -- DRAWN BY MAP•erC- DATE r / 9 r . e.:?: '.+ems CHECKED BY =It � � -mss -'� • - __._L- -r .i-._ -: COJNTY ROAD ND. �' APPROVED BY COUNTY ENGIN?ER '`' -: ` WELD COUNTY DEPARTMINT Or ENGIt'JEER1N3 I '- . - roan 1E 890414 2/it . - iff mEmoRAI1DUm INC Clerk to the Board May 11, 1989 7o nee George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge j4 COLORADO From Road Closure Subloot' The following road was closed May 10, 1989 due to an unsafe bridge. It will be closed until repairs are made, or replacement can be made. Please place this on the Board's next agenda: WCR 31 between WCR 38.75 & WCR 90 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 31 WCR 88.75 WCR 90 690 414 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SETTING OF PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING - HOWARD DUCKWORTH, DBA WELD COUNTY DISPOSAL, INC. WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on the 10th day of May, 1989 , in the Chambers of the Board, the Board was advised of an additional violation of Special Use Permit #454 , granted to Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. , and WHEREAS, after hearing the testimony presented, the Board deems it advisable to set a Probable Cause Hearing to consider whether there is sufficient reason to hold a Show Cause Hearing on said violation, and WHEREAS, the Board deemed it advisable that said Probable Cause Hearing shall be set for May 17, 1989, at 10:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that a Probable Cause Hearing concerning Special Use Permit f454 , granted to Howard Duckworth, dba Weld County Disposal, Inc. , be, and hereby is, set for May 17, 1989, at 10: 00 a.m. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of May, A.D. , 1989. Lf BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ^ r� WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder /10, UN and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kirby, Ch irman - EXCUSED �Y V Ja ueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Deputy County C erk APPROVED TO FORM: Gene R. Brantner CCM Ge rge dy County Attorney 7 C /�� p A 6i 890415 r/ 4icc/�,..r..t.�_-�y��'�� -fit J t S,DPr FORM PRESCRIBED BY Tilt PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR FORM 920 I/oS-vas PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES—W0EC*EL do., ocnven asses • • Petitioners: Use this side only. GREELEY , Colorado MAY...1 , 19. .8.9. ' City or Town To The Honorable Board of County Commissioners of WELD County Gentlemen: The petition of EL14E.R...E.,....IIUNDV.ALI, whose mailing address is: P•Q.BOX 632 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 City or Town state Zip Code SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL 2636886 7673-D AN AIR STRIP 75 'X 1947 ' M/L LOCATED IN S2S2NW4 26-5-66 . respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A. D. 19..8.7..., 19....8.&., 19 are erroneous or illegal for the following reasons, viz: (Explain completely why the assessment is erroneous or illegal) VALUE TOO HIGH FOR UNUSABLE PARCEL OF LAND. PROPERTY WAS PROTESTED IN 1987 AND VALUE NOT CORRECTED. 19...$.7. 1988 19 Value Tax Value Tax Value Tax Orig. 4870 $348 .86 4870 $379 .50 Abate. 1920 $209 .18 2920 $227. 54 Bal. 1950 $139 .68 1950 $151 .96 That he has paid said taxes. Wherefore your petitioner prays that the taxes, as aforesaid erroneously or illegally assessed, may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 43E.,..72 I declare, unaer penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any _ accompanying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. boner / L/ Agent Address (� \ A5 CriO /,:,� %o,�,t. - '. ,r_�,...<Sr ' 890417 RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the.. 15th day of May A.D. 19...89..,at which meeting there were present the following members: Chairman C.W. Kirby, and Commissioners Gene R. Brantner, Jacqueline Johnson, George Kennedy, and Gordon E. Lacy notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County and said Assessor Richard W. Keirnes, present and taxpayer Elmer E. Lundvall not being present; and (name) (name) WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within applica- tion, and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED. That the Board concurs with the recommendation of (Concurs or does not Concur) the assessor and the petition be...approved,,. and an abatement/refund be allowed (a➢proved or denied) (be allowed or not be allowed) on an assessed valuation of$....2,920..............for $ 436.72 total tax for the year(s) 19 87 Si 1988 Chairman of Boar f County Commissioners. STATE OF COLORADO, )) Weld ss. County of 1) I Mary Ann Feuerstein . , County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Weld County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at.............Gxeekey this 15th day of May ,A. 0. 19 89 .- .-....... 40. ,fir 4 rJ County Clerk. -�-.., ,I By__. c. ?2htt_,. . . ,� Deputy. ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR _ Denver, Colorado, 19 The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby ❑ approved; 0 approved in part $ 0 denied for the following reason(s) ATTEST: Secretary. Property Tax Administrator. v, 4 ! T^ V w y t a III c l rTh: : 9 ' VNu, - � 0�3 oa + u.Ow L y al • :u N y ' V y Y•�• V•�ta. p 4 0-a gaited 0 Y >1% \ 4 y —>4 Ec o: 0 pa C u,, 1 7, .n j („) f.1 Q� V a s `' `�,l � �? 8 2 7 0 2 a`°t ° Z Y ft s \`� aE8 dT Sao 3 R�k 0 0 .c 'O '� td C r� v�� ' ' 4 € c .. ._ 7 e.. C _ N .. 2 I 2 ED, a q = Y 890417 r a 1 IB.DP'r FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE PROPERTY TAX AOMINIBTRATOR FORM 920 t/ee•vea PETITION FOR ABATEMENT OR REFUND OF TAXES—Hoccaet. CO.. CLOVER aaaos Petitioners: Use this side only. GREELEX , Colorado MAX...1 , 19....8.9. City or Town To The Honorable Board of County Commissioners of WELD County • • Gentlemen: • The petition of E.LM£.R...E.r....L.UNDVALL whose mailing address r.B4....6.3............. GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 • City or Town State Zlp Code SCHEDULE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS LISTED ON TAX ROLL 2636886 7673-D AN AIR STRIP 75'X 1947 ' M/L LOCATED IN S2S2NW4 26-5-66 respectfully requests that the taxes assessed against the above property for the years A. D. 19..8.7...., 19....8.8.., 19 are erroneous or illegal for the following reasons, viz: (Explain completely why the assessment is erroneous or illegal) VALUE TOO HIGH FOR UNUSABLE PARCEL OF LAND. PROPERTY WAS PROTESTED IN 1987 AND VALUE NOT CORRECTED. 198 8 19 Value Tax Value 'Fax Value Tax Orig. 4870 $348 .86 4870 $379. 50 Abate. 2.920 $2Q9. 18 2920 $227. 54 Bal. 1950 $139. 68 1950 $151 .96 That he has paid said taxes. Wherefore your petitioner prays that the taxes, as aforesaid erroneously or illegally assessed, may be abated or refunded in the sum of $ 4.36...7.2 1 declare, unaer penalty of perjury in the second degree that this petition, together with any accompanying exhibits or statements, has been examined by me and to the best of my knowledge, information and belief is true, correct and complete. dtioner Address . AL (L'1942i I .�_::_L. -•� J.nvr. �';�L; /✓:ri:.. - 89417 1 RESOLUTION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS, The County Commissioners of Weld County, State of Colorado, at a duly and lawfully called regular meeting held on the 15th day of May , A.D. 19 89 at which meeting there were present the following members. Chairman C.W. Kirby, and Commissioners Gene R. Brantner, Jacqueline Johnson, George Kennedy, and Gordon E. Lacy notice of such meeting and an opportunity to be present having been given to the taxpayer and the Assessor of said County and said Assessor Richard W. Keirnes, present and taxpayer Elmer E. Lundvall not being present; and (name) (name) WHEREAS, The said County Commissioners have carefully considered the within applica- tion, and are fully advised in relation thereto, NOW BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board concurs with the recommendation of (Concurs or does not concur) the assessor and the petition be approved and an abatement/refund be allowed (APO-roved or denied) (be allowed or not be allowed) on an assessed valuation of$ 2,920 for $ 436.72 total tax for the year(s) 19 87 & 1988 1.94,7:64-Chairman of Boar f County Commissioners. STATE OF COLORADO, i weld ss. County of I, Mary Ann Feuerstein , County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Weld State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing order is truly copied from the records of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Weld County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at QreeXcy this 15th .day of May A. D. 19 89 County Clerk. Deputy. ACTION OF THE PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR Denver,Colorado, , 19 The action of the Board of County Commissioners, relative to the within petition, is hereby ❑ approved: 0 approved in part $ 0 denied for the following reason(s) ATTEST: Secretary. Property Tax Administrator. a) �, � o,o �F+ �... v OyL OyL �' p) M ° C ,,, • \ Vi N Q 7f G61 L N i, p try '. .,-' • al . Vc 0 @ 0..5 sE H L c�"1'. 0 es •ti r � C < „, � cy a g 4 Is t X >i Z. (9 lL \ -4 «D.) ,,22 e = O t..) O 16 ., m L I ^ 111 (� 4 > a aoo 'a 07 W o l �� yc O ' tIEaovC .• �' y y N Fa Q � 'flu , E'2 8 ~ 'O 7 d tX v cc S 0 CD R. ` Y coPo Fes, o a a< 89 )417 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN' WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER Ift a D P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80632 igi (303)358•x000 EXT.4225 O • COLORADO May 3, 1989 Elmer E. Lundvall P.O. Box 632 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Mr. Lundval'_: This is to advise you that the Weld County Board of County Ccamissioners will hear your petition for tax abatement or refund on the property described as: 7673-D an Air Strip 75' x 1947' M/L located in SiS}NW}, Section 26, 'Tow-ship 5 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. This meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 15, 1989, at 9:00 A.M. at which time you may be heard. The meeting will be held in the Chambers of the Board, Weld County Centennial Center, First Floor, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the above specified time. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, • Mazy Ann Feuerstein Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board LL C CY XC: Assessor • 890417 • CVA-26 REV. 10/88 . COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES - DIVISION OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COUNTY VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER'S MONTHLY REPORT AND CERTIFICATION OF PAY Weld COUNTY MONTH April 19 89 BENEFITS AND SERVIES CLAIMED NO. BENEFITS AND SERVICES CLAIMED NO. Telephone Calls 251 Compensation 177 Personal Contacts (Office) 240 I DIC 41 Personal Contacts (Home) 77 I Pension 152 23-22 — Colo Veterans Affairs 5 ( Death Pension 137 23-22 — Other Organizations I 3 I Insurance I 1 Medicaid Cases Z7 Burial Allowance 6 Loan Applications 3 I Voc. Rehab & Education 3 Medical Benefits ' I 18 State Benefits I 1 I I I hereby certify that on this date May 11, 1989 . I have been paid a salary for the month of April 19 °' from Weld County in the amount of $1840.92 dollars for my services as county veterans service officer; and, in addition, that $1631.78 dollars have been disbursed by said county for expenses incurred in the operation of the county . veterans service office, in accordance with 26-10-108, 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes. I hereby certify the accuracy of this Report. 711 (Signed) e County Commis ' ner or their deli n camf!/r of WELD County Q This certification submitted monthly, properly signed and executed, will be considered as application for the monetary benefits payable to the County General Fund, in accordance with 26-10-108, 1973 Colorado Revised Statutes. This form should be submitted before the 15th of the following month. Mail to: Colorado Department of Social Services, Division of Veterans Affairs, 1575 Sherman Street, 1st Floor, Denver, CO 80203-1714. V 2 QOD! 890438 i!ft \\ mEm®RAnDUm C. W. Kirby, Chairman wiiieTo Board of County Commissioners Dare May 15, 1989 COLORADO From Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Resources ifiaf.f PY '89 Migrant Head Start Supplemental Grant Application subject: Enclosed for Board approval is the PY '89 Migrant Head Start Supplemental Grant Application. This grant application includes a 1% cost of living increase in the amount of $2,864 and $5,564 for salary enhancement for a total of $8,428. The period of the grant is from June 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990. •- 'V1 Mr. �x r s ' S' Y �.:,� v,,,sy k" f+,,,,:"',:;, 1.4,-, a"`n`J n,�' ??.. *'Ptjd, r°yy +' ;. °`AAyR w^.(" +,d,'t1. ry e�AG'". gg�q y"4,4:.t :Vol.. �kJ v ak dye y+u 45.71-, a"hN' 4 -t. ?w 4.R p'�*Ys'v'+WwtMiVO`+�?�. rt� a; *' ^qc'''`”-: 7 M r i 2 : .�;y t,'^.q ,P,,.,++, M41"1, a'l,, m.j. P•i,'c s` t r. r gb n a. w : OA* to the SWAM AtS, *toot WO Start ad Shvant Appl!oition • Encipsed;are three t opies. of this Grant licrtion. Please return e two of kiu 'When they are signed. titf you heere ,any questions, telephone `, , me at 353-3816. v' C Sc,., r„,;;:- t,4,,,‘„,, W'! 1 , ,...r. ._ 090419 ',r v.7 ff,. J_J ✓ OMB Appeal No.0746-0000 _ FEDERAL ASSISTANCE I2. APPL4 •.NUMBER 3. STATE la NUMBER CANTS APPLE. APPLI. CATION . I. TYPE CATION IOENTI- SUBMISSION FIER 0 NOTICE OF INTENT(OPTIONAL) FlER b.DATE Nets To BE b. DATE (Mark op 0 PREAPPLICATION Poo mantle day ,tea ASSIGNED Year month ray nein. ® APPLICATION 19 BY STATE 19 Laos Blank 4. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT 5. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(EIN) a.Applicant Name . Weld County Division of Human Resources I 8a=6Q00813 b.Organization Unit . Weld County Head Start Program 6 o.Street/P.0,00x P.O. Box 1805 PRO- A NUMBER4 13 V 16 ! 01 o I O.City Greeley „county Weld GRAM f.Slaw Colorado o.zIP Code. 80632 (From CFDM MULTIPLE 0 b.Contact Person(Name Mr. Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director b. TITLE Migrant Head Start 4. a TArpAole Nal (303) 353-3816, extension 3300 Daycare I- 7. TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT(Use section IV of this fpm to provide a summery description of the B. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT Prolect) _A-•� G-•,.r Awes O,n1 ass woman 1989 Migrant Head Start/Daycare Program o-4ougamos ` "wakee`W Supplemental Grant ;;,",,, o„a (COLA and Salary Enhancement) Boereyn,rNete knee f9. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT(Nome of cities earntle4 trolr4 NO 10.ESTIMATED NUMBER 1/. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE ,) OF PERSONS BENEFITING II-Oapplowmya.• Ear uoi,-, 200 �aa" st d iBt J 112. PROPOSED FUNDING 113. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: J 14. TYPE OF APPLICATION IIn-,4. c.a. E-wy,inwww I•.FEDERAL IS 8,428 00 I • APPLICANT b. PROJECT Imo•- b-C -MM Q lb.APPLICANT 2,107 .99 4 County-Wide I17. TYPEOF0w10EOFr/4r/k/ *-save an f-Gee(Spry,): Ic.STATE .001 15. PROJECT START 16. PROJECT 1-o••••••aw Id,LOCALATE Year wont, der DURATION Nesson Danisr. COOO I E.-Pam,ueu I i 10$9 06 01 12 Moneta E , , , )a.OTHER 'x'16. DATE DUE TO Year month day esSIsfriW Al ( If. Total I5 10,535 .90+ FEDERAL AGENCY. 19 • 19. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REOUESr I20 EXISTING FEDERAL GRANT _ Administration for Children, Youth and famil1 eS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Ia. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT(IF APPROPRIATE) Ib.ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT(IF KNOWN) I 90-CM-0136 C. ADORESS 2((1� I 21. REMARKS ADDED No To the best of my knowledge and belief. a. YES,THIS NOTICE OF INTENT/PHEAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE STATE fTHE data In Mil paaoOlkaboa/appicefron EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON: APPLICANT ate Inks sad came,the document has w CERTIFIES been duly authorized by tM 90 eNN DATE • Pc THAT. body of 01e applicant and tee appic•nt y� - kr MA comply MN the attecMwr d a •nces b. NO,PROGRAM IS NOY COVERED BY E.0.12372 it `( K the assistance 4 appraed, OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW O 27. a. TYPED NAME AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE CERTIFYING {pI K�(77 bhyy ��``yh� •aa7 dpp REPRE- &AlfG Viiik. SaPQmor Commissioners 4t I24. APPLICA• Year month do 25. FEDERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 26. FE RAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION TOON RECEIVED 19 I 27. ACTION TAKEN 126• FUNDING Year mark day j 30. lownam.k deer 37µ7WG O a, AWARDED I 29. ACTION DATE, 19 DATE 19 0 b. REJECTED I e. FEDERAL S 00 31. CONTACT FOR*OPTIONAL INFORM,. I22. Year month dale 0 C. RETURNED FOR TION(Nome and trlry$onr number) IENOtNG AMENDMENT I b. APPLICANT .00 DATE 19 a 0 d. RETURNED FOR • 0 E.O. 17372 SUBMISSION I C. STATE .00( 33. REMARKS ADDEO K BY APPLICANT TO I O. LOCAL .00 1. STATE 0 s. DEFERRED I s. OTHER I .00I _ 0I. WITHDRAWN 11. TOTAL 5 .001 El.(..(� En O No NSN 75.0-01-006-0102 424103 830419 STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 1(Rev.4-64) - PREVIOUS EDITION ywrnbed by OMB Candor A-707 IS NOT USABLE PART II O.648 NO 03414006 PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION Item I, - - Ooosdthis assistance request require Name of Governing Body State, local regional,or other priority rating? Priority Rating Yes X No Item 2. Ooes this assistance request require State,or local Name of Agency or advisory, educational or health Clearances? Board Yes No (Attach Documentation) Item 3:ail ----`—------ — — y )� s this assistance request require State, local, Name of Appr vin `Agency]U{chett�} J ,yel regional or other planning approval? Date �j0�y.; X Yes NO Item a. ISS Ins proposed project covered by an approved compre• Check one: Stale ❑ pensive plan? Local Lu Regional ❑ Yes X No Location of Plan Item 5. W1l the assistance requested serve a Federal Name of Federal Installation installation? Yes X No Federal Population benefiting from Project Item 6. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or Name of Federal Installation installation? Location of Federal Lan' :._Yes X No Percent of Project Item 7. Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect See instructions for additional information to be on the environment provided. Yes Xt No Item 8. Number of: iIW fine assistance requested cause the displacement Individuals of individuals,families,businesses, or farms? Families Businesses Yes No Farms Rem 9. Is there other related assistance on this project previous, See Instructions for additional information to be pending,or anticipated provided, • Yes X No 890419 oue b.0)* s PART III -OUDGET INFORMATION SECTION A-BUDGET SUMMARY Grant Program, Federal I Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget Function Catalog No. or ActivityFederal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total (al fb) (cl (d) (e) In (q� It PA 23 13.600 S s S 8,356 S 2,089 $ 10,445 12. PA 26 113.600 I 72 18 I 90 I3' I I I I I I a. I I 15. TOTALS IS IS Is 8,428 Is 2.10/ Is 10,535 ' SECTION B-BUDGET CATEGORIES 6. Object Class Categories I Grant Program, Function or Activity Total i) PA 23 lo PA 26 6) I(a) (51 a. Personnel $ 7,266 Is 66 S Is a 7,332 b. Fringe Benefits 1,090 6 I 1,096 c. Travel I d. Equipment e. Supplies I I f. Contractual I I g. Construction h. Other i, Total Direct Charges 8.428 72 I I 8,428 j. Indirect Charges I k. TOTALS $ 8.428 $ 72 S Is S 8,428 17. Program Income IS Is IS IS Ile S 890419 Leo. SECTION C-NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES I I (a)Grant Prooram J (b)APPLICANT I (c)STATE I(d)OTHER SOURCES (e)TOTALS III 1 8. PA 23 l$ 2,089 is l$ S 2,089 I s. PA 26 I 18 I 18 I to. I 111. I 112. TOTALS S 2,107 S IS 1S 2,107 SECTION O-FORECASTED CASH NEEDS I Total (or ist Year I 1st Quarter I 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter I 4th Quarter 1 13. Federal IS IS Is $ S I 114. Non-Federal I I I I 115. TOTAL Is IS Is IS S I SECTION E-BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS(YEARS) I (a)Grant Program {b)FIRST 1 (c)SECOND (d)THIRD I (e)FOURTH I 116. �$ Is S $ 117. lit I 119. I I Ito. TOTALS IS Is IS IS SECTION F-OTHER 8UC-3Ef INFORMATION (Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary) 21. Direct Charges: 22. Indirect Charges: 23. Remarks: PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach per instruction) 830419 L WEED COUNTY, COLORADO PAGE CrneraZ FUND CAlMS V.O. WARRANT NO. P.O. NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 9O2341 081852 COLORADO COUNTIES INC. 525.00 f i TOTAL $ 525.00 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF wan ) This is to certify that all accounting and budgeting procedures have been completed on the above listed claims as shown on Pace 1 through 1 and dated Mew 75 , 19 89 and that payments should be made to the respective vendors in the amounts set opposite their names with the total amount $ 525.00 DAT= THIS 15 DAY OF May , 1989 . WELD COLA k :cE OFFICE SUBSCRIBED AND MOM TO BEFORE NE THIS I5 DAY OF May 19 89 . MY COMMISSION E,'CPIRES• My Commission Fxpkn June 8, 1990 N tI STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) We, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby (approve) (disapprove) the claims as set forth above; and warrants in payment therefore are hereby ordered drawn upon the General ,FUND totaling $ ,525_pry G"� a . Chairperson ATTEST ‘77) e er y ii`,t County .erk & Recorder Member r4-4l.fp244 ,, . ttt .r Yom. A De ty Member Me WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/10/09 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 05/ 10/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER PD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT • • A110613 AAA PROCESS SERVERS. INC. RF8911 01-2110-6599-CIVL 7.50 _ • 7.5041 2 =-- • A110614 CANTRELL REX 051089 01-3182-6370 24.4041 24.40 • • A110615 CITY OF DACONA 377690 OI-1061-6340-ROAD 30.00 • ---------- • 30.00 41 A110616 CITY OF GREELEY 10040 34-1944-6920-NOCC 325. 16 • • 325. 16 • • A110617 CRAWFORD SUPPLY COMPANY 160338 86-2311-625000MM 106.83 • - 106.83 • ____ . A110618 CURRY, JUDY R. 042789 0I-2110-6372-AUXL 36.00 41 41 36.00 • • A110619 DEEP ROCK 890420 88-2112-6220-AUXL 9.20 • ---- 9.20 . • A110620 DILL1 RICK 4340 01-2110-6370-ADM 6.00 • • 6.00 • 4110621 FRAZIER f E (JIM! CONSUL- MAY 19-4140-6220 80.00 • • 80.00 • 41 4110622 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 5T0489 21-6510-6337-9 982.98 • • • . • 0 • • WAP200P WELD C00NTY DATE : 05/10/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 • AS OF : 03/10/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • S A110622 GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 5T0489 21-6600-6337-9 621 .03 21-6820-6337-9 285.75 • 574504 01-1lS4-6337 26.40 • 574506 01-1154-6337 50.40 574508 01-1154-6337 72.00 • 697880 21-6480-6337-8 179.70 • 89171 01-1021-6331 74.88 --....... • 2,293. 14 • • A110623 GREELEY GAS CO 005615 01-1061-6344-AN8 44.37 • 44.37 • • A110624 GREELEY LANDSCAPE 43089 52-5510-6366 130.00 • 41 130.00 • • A110625 GREELEY STORAGE, INC. ST0489 21-6600-6346-9 62.50 • 62.50 • c.cz • A110626 GUERRERO TED! N10489 21-6950-6372 45.40 • 45.40 A110627 HAMMERS, LAVERN £• M105OS 01-2150-6370 35.58 • • 35.58 a • • Al►0628 JEROME CO H13599 86-2311-6250-COMM 115.34 • 115.34 • _-_S • A110629 JOHNSTOWN BREEZE 50189 52-5510-6333 14.00 • 14.00 • 41 • 41 • • • • CID • ` WAP20OP WELD cOUNTY BATE ' S os/10/89 • NARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • AS OF : 05/10/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROD AMOUNT 4110630 KELLY, MAUREEN M10489 21-6620-6375-9 23.40 • 23.40 • ,========,===== • A110631 KIRBY C W "BILL" NE0489 01-1011-6375-AL2 163.20 O1-1011-6377-AL2 43. 12 • 206.32 ID mats • A110632 LARA, DORA E MI0489 21-6490-6372-8 49.20 49.20 • A110633 LAWSON. BILL OS09MI 01-1041-6370 398.20 • _-_----- • 398.20 la • 0 A110634 MATT. JULIE A. 04149 01-1123-6350 44.60 • 44.50 • • A1106JS METRO WEST PUBLISHING INC 126SIS 01-1021-6331 14.08 • 126089 01-1021-6331 26.88 • MM 40.96 • • A110636 MICRO COMPUTER WORLD INC 12270 52-5510-6212 5.00 0 5.00 • A110637 MINE SAFETY C HLTH ADMIN 032996 11-3i46-6452 20.00 20.00 ID 0 4110638 MODULAIRE-D£NUER 000878 21-6590-6531-9 1 .610.00 • _ 1 .610.00 • 0 v ID J IP ID WAP200P MELO COUNTY DATE t 05/10/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 1 ♦ • AS OF 1 05/10/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • A110639 MORENO PEDRO MI0489 21-6700-6372-9 52.00 • 52.00 • r • A110640 MSP RESOURCES. INC ER0489 21-6490-6380-8A 304.00 • 304.00 • _�--=_ • A110641 PEDERSON. LARRY 26I4LP 01-2118-6220 26.14 • • 26.14 • • *110642 TEMI( CORPORATION 89029 01-2110-6226-TRNG 234.50 • 234. 50 • • --------------- • FINAL TOTAL : 6,379.64 _ s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r► e NAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE I '05/10/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE I S ID AS OF : 05/10/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED OH THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS' AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 4 • AND • DATED 05/10/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE - AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT i_ 6.379`64- ....... • • DATED THIS % 15th 0 Y F f May 19 89 . • • __ - • DIRE 0 F I ANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 15th_ DAY OF ___kW _ 19 89__. • NY COMMISSION EXPIRES: sras 4.4*e A.A_L fl 41 ID _ ' _ • � �� NOTARY PC S WED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY' COLORADO_ HEREBY 41 Mr - (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE General FUND — TOTALING i _6_379.64 ___ ID • DATED THIS 15th DAY OF May 19 89 10 41 --- COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • . / DEPUTY ��_ ._CHAIRMAN • ME ID &÷.9.. 51\2aVion--- MEMBER • 0 SZ--igaffaac:- 0 MEMBER MEMBER 40 • • • • • • ID41 MWP251P SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER OS/10/89 • PAGE 4 FOSTER CARE AFDC-PC REPORT 18:40:24 • DATE OF MAILING WARRANTS 05/15/89 FOR THE MONTH PAID MAY 1989 • WARRANT I.0. FACILITY NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER AMOUNT • 0 NUMBER OF WARRANTS = 48 TOTAL = $45,528.37 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE SEEN • • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 THROUGH 3 • AND • DATED 05/10/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $__JJ_.5$&,,,12--____• • • DATED THI _-j1 O 1 „_ --- ----_____ 198 _--• • • DIR TOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRA SERVICES • • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ___15th DAY OF ---- — 19..0__—. • MY 1 Ccalatwn bans!un e8, i •C EXPIRES: +4r_ ______________ __ ____r • _ea- OMMISSION NOTARY LIC • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRA%TS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Social Services FUND — TOTALING $__4,5,528 iZ • DATED THIS _ 15th _ DAY OF _ Mly_ 19- 9 _. • • • COUNTY ERK AND RECORDER BY • • ''' Zaita-1.2tse..-/-rt F 4 7/ DEPUTY—__ CHAIRMAN MEMBER -.1 )1511414trisa4 .."-- MEMBER • ✓4J _ le d_.MEMBER MEMBER • „1" • 41 WWP25IP SOCIAL SERVICES WARRANT REGISTER 05/t0/89 • PAGE 5 FOSTER CARE C W - F C REPORT 18:40:2♦ • DATE OF HAILING WARRANTS OS/15/89 FOR THE MONTH PAID NAY 1989 • WARRANT I.D. FACILITY NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER AMOUNT • • NUMBER OF WARRANTS = 90 TOTAL = 185.699. 12 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN • • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE t THROUGH 4 • AND • OATED 05/)0/89• AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES• WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT I_Lida,a- . • • DATED THIS ' jab Y F h� _—_ _ 198$___. 41 DIRE d OF NA CE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __tub DAY OF -Sg_ ... 19-$, • • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: / My C°`mlub^ EvOtrellungs, IMO • • • -j �+--/�a9dziG'fis"A • NOTARY-1UBLIC • WE• THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. HEREBY • (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE: AND WARRANTS IN • • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE ____$Qaj zayja_____— FUND - TOTALING i--$y699.1?_-- • DATED THIS __.Zaa DAY OF -__E^ &_-_ - 19.63,_.--. • • `fik�TN y u d�RD[h ---- • COUNTY LERK AND RECORDER BY • ____Z_Z-_,..tf---t- DEPUTY CHAIRMAN 41 41 MEMBER MEMBER . - _/• MEMBER MEMBER • • • ID s NAP?.00P HELD COUNTY DATE : 05/11/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS OF : 05/11/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • • A11064J ALADDIN SYNERGETICS1 INC. 4091 0►-2310-6212-KTEN 223.62 • 223. 62 • • A110644 ANDERSEN' S STAR MARKET 000619 01-1123-6599 71 .64 • • 71 .64 • • 4110645 C.M. ELECTRONICS 000615 01 -1123-6599 90.64 • 90.6♦ • • A110646 CORER PRINTING 12112 19-4110-0326 27.00 12116 19-4140-6229-TP 10.00 • 12117 19-4110-6326 57. 00 • 19-4140-6229-INJ 21 .00 15105 01-3700-6410 24.00 • 7083 19-4140-6229-TP 6.00 • 145.00 • • -____ • A110641 COUNTY SEAT 000626 01-1123-6599 57.24 57124 • • A110648 CREATIVE STRUCTURES. INC 043089 11-3190-6397 7 .129.60 • 7,129.60 • • A110649 CURTIN MATHESON SC! INC 291299 19-4170-6250-GNRL 54.44 • 54.44 • • • A110650 EVANS U-PUMP-IT 000624 0►-1123-6599 16.00 • 16.00 • • A110651 GORDON'S LIQOUR MART 000610 01-1123-6599 12. 16 • • , • • • • ' • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/11/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 • AS OF : 05/11/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT 08J PROJ AMOUNT 0 Ill A11O651 cokauN*S LIQUOR MART 000611 01-1123-6599 22.96 000614 01-1123-6599 19. 16 • 000618 01-1123-6599 168656 000b25 01-1123-6599 11 .99 • 234685 S - 1 A110652 HALLORAN' PAUL ML510 25-9070-6370-GAL 113.20 0 113.20 0 .-.-3 2 0 i A110653 JACKSON* DALE IRWIN 050389 01-1123-6599 5.00 • 5.00 • 0 A110654 K.-MART 000617 01-1123-6599 56.01 000621 01-1123-6599 10600 ID 000622 01-1123-6599 4.48 0 000627 01-1123-6599 112670 00062d 01-1123-6599 --------130000- • 313. 19 A110655 MCCORKLE* CLARENCE OR 220905 24-9044-6397-4715 140.00 140.00 e • A110656 PIZZA OUT 000610 01-1123-6599 10. 30 0 t 10. 30 ID • A110657 SAFEWAY STORES INC 000623 01-1123-6599 29600 . 29.00 41 0 A110658 SCOTT* LINDA MLSS89 24-9073-6370-4150 59695 ML0995 24-9032-6370-4150 130.20 ID 8959 24-9043-6370-4150 12.75 202.90 • • • O • 41 WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY OATS : 05/11/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 AS OF : 05/11/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • 4110659 SILGRIST CONSTRUCTION CO 3981 11-3190-6397 102,498.79 • 102,498. 79 • • A110660 WAL-MART DISCOUNT CITIES 000612 01-1123-6599 23.81 • 000613 01-1123-6599 55.67 • 000620 01-1123-6599 13.36 • 92.84 • A110661 WELD CNTY CLERK G 59 25-9071-6397-GAL 91 .25 • 91 .25 • m= • 4110662 WINDSOR CONOCO 000629 01-1123-6599 40.00 • 40.00 • • - A110663 WINDSOR PIZZA HUT 000631 01-1123-6599 15.0041 • 15.00 • • A110664 WINDSOR SQUARE LIQUOR 000630 01-1123-6599 15.00 15.00 • • • FINAL TOTAL : 111 ,589. 50 • • • • • • • • • • • • 4. • WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/11/89 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 41 AS OF : 05/ 11/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PRODECURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED UN THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 3 , AND • DATED 05/11/893 AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE ® AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT f_111,589. 50 . • DATED THI __15 _ A F May 19 gg__. • • ____ - _ f ------- S DIRECTOR O F NANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 15th DAY OF May 19 89 . • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES : ExW+esJune8. 1990 • • • � 1,_42-...-4__ - . ld. sir NOTAR LEG • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY • • _ (APPROVE) (DISAPPROVE) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE ; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE General FUND - TOTALING S�111,589.50 • DATED THIS 15th DAY ofd 1989 ,_--_^--- • 41 Yeafitzfroni 41 • COUNTY ERK AND RECORDER BY r �� J 5 - • DEPUTY CHAIRMAN..;448.-Cr----.) ' Eacirrl # Cbst÷41.51,• MEMbE / MEMBER • _ /12:4,4,-- --) • MEMBER MEMBER S • • • • • • d. _ _ ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 1 • AS Of : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER ED DEPT OBJ PRUJ AMOUNT • • A110665 AGLANU INC A27499 11-1140-6371 275. 99 A27535 11 -3140-6371 207. 17 • C26096 11-3140-6371 611 .78 • 011900 11-3140-6371 116.56 P11018 11-3140-6371 625.75 • 017952 ► 1 -3140-6371 1 ,390.40 41 017954 11 -3140-6371 92 .52 • 3,320 . 17 • • A11Ob66 AGUERO1 JUAN 051589 21-6490-6398-85W 25.00 • - 25.00 • 41 A110667 MARE)RE. LOUIS 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 120. 00 I • 411 ?0.00 • • A110668 ALLMER, GERALD 051589 21-6540-6398-9 784. 00 • 784.00 41 • A110669 ARMSTRONG, AMANDA 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 25. 00 • • 25.00 41 • A110670 ATGT 40013 67-1192-6533 26. 35 • 26. 35 • • A110671 BACA. MARX 051589 21 -6490-6398-8YTO 100 .50 • 100. 50 • • A110672 BAKER 6 TAYLOR CO 01359 52-5510-6337 746.20 • 08146 52-5510-6337 275. 50 • 31841 52-5510-6337 88. 00 37675 52-5510-6337 150.60 • • 1 ,260. 30 41 41 • o I . 41 41 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 2 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110673 dUCKIUS, KELLY 051589 21-6490-6398-8Y10 112. 50 • 112. 50 41 • A11O674 BRAUN' ELISABETH 8. ri. 045970 79-4410^6143 99. 82 • 047690 79-4410-6143 2.73 • 06894U 79-4410-6143 63, 81 41 166.36 • • A110675 BRYANT, TODD 051589 21 -6490-6398-8YT0 114 . 00 • 114,00 • • A110676 BUCKNER , JANENC 051589 21-6490-6398-85W 18 . 75 • 18.75 41 41 A110677 BUREAU OF BUS PRACTICE 208698 01-1154-6330 38.94 41• 38 . 94 • ' -- • A11067d CICCONE, LUCIANA 051589 21-6490-6398-8P51 120 . 00 • 120.00 • • AI10679 COLO DEPT OF HEALTH AIRMTG 19-4170^6370-A 109. 25 • 109 . 25 41 41 A110680 COLORADO ASSESSORS' ASSOC 062089 01-1021.-6370 35.00 S 41 15.00 • 41 A110681 COLORADO DEPT OF REVENUE LIC509 19-4170-6599 160 .00 41 160.00 • • • • • 41 41 .. . 1 I .. I I i . 1.„ ID 0 WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 3 • - AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PRUJ AMOUNT • • A110682 COPY RIGHT, INC. 5103 52-5510-6320 145.00 • 145.00 • • 4110683 DATA PRO 37224A 65-1191-6330 1 ,168. 00 • 1 , 168.00 • - A110684 DENVER BUSINESS JOURNAL 13632 01-1153-6337 144 .00 • • 144. 00 • • A11068S DENVER POST 960796 01-2110-6320-ADM 87.04 19-4110-6320 95.60 Ill IP 132 .64 _ • _ • 4110686 DOTY' S PEST CONTROL SERV 05001 52-5510-6366 75. 00 • 75. 00 • • A110687 DRAWER, DON 223* 25-9060-6397-87 445.00 • 445.00 • ID A110688 ERUES1 MOLLIE K FU0489 21-6590-6377-9 5. 47 • 21-6600-6377-9 5,03 • 21-6640-6377-8 8.03 M10489 21-6590-6375-9 6.40 • • 21-6600-6375-9 36.40 21-66406375-8 30.00 • 91 . 33 • • A110689 FAUILKNER , PRISCILLA 050489 79-4140-6143 176. 00 • 176.00 • Ill • • • • • IP t ® o WAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 0 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 4 0 AS OF : 05/12/89 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER HARRANI ID NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT ID 0 Ai10690 FIRST NORTHERN SAVINGS 24489 77-5300-6610 548 . 12 77-5300-6620 69. 50 •ID *17.62 0 0 A110691 FRIAS . ROSITA 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 90.00 0 90. 00 0 OD A110692 GESICK , BRIAN 051589 21-6490-6398-8YTO 115.50 0 115. 50 • • A110693 GOLUO, ROGER M. D. FP0508 19-4140-6350-FP 52 .50 • . 52.50 0 0 A110694 GONZALES. VALERIE 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 90.00 ID 90.00 A110695 GORDON. RANDY M. D. 0328 19-4110-6370 28. 32 Ill - 28. 32 . 0 IDAtI0696 GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY 739601 65-1191-6948 346. 40 346.40 A110691 GRAFF; MARILYN 0512M1 01-1041-6370 30.00 30 . 00 0 A11069d GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE THE 574767 01 -1154-6337 31 .20 31 . 20 . _ 0 0 ID 41 41 ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 5 • AS OF : 05/ 12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110699 GREELEY GAS CO 723804 77-5300-6344 32. 13 724004 77-5300-6344 17. 49 • 731004 77-5310-6344 55.20 • 742604 77-5300-6444 8. 59 !, 743204 77-5300-6344 8. 44 • • 121 .75 • • A110700 GREELEY NATIONAL BANK 721503 77-5300-6610 152 . 2♦ 77-5300-6620 86. 14 41 • 238.38 • • A110701 GREELEY WELD CNTY AIRPORT ROd 77-5310-6366 37. 00 42389 77-5300-6220 19.05 • 3921 77-5310-6220 7.69 • 4025 77-5310-6220 .94 ♦2489 77-5310-6220 4. 51 • 44089 77-5310-6220 15 .05 • 5589 77-5310-6311 . 20 56150 77-5300-6365 3. 17 • 681026 77-5310-6311 6. 57 • 94. 1B • • A110702 GUERRERO1 DANIEL 051589 21 -6490-6398-8SW 12. 50 • • 12.50 • • A110703 HADDOCK JR.' GARY 051589 21-6490-6398-8YT0 58. 74 • 58. 74 • • A110704 HAGANSI ALIA M40417 I9-4140-6370-CMP 2.40 • 0416 19-4140-6370-CHP .80 0417 19-4140-6370-WAP 9.60 • • 12.80 • • A110701 HAMMERS; ANDREA MLOti03 65-1191-6370 43. 80 • • • 0 • • ID ID ' NAP200P MELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 6 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROD AMOUNT • --- • A110705 HAMMERS; ANDREA 43 . 80 • - . A110706 HARRIS, JANE A. 051089 79-4410-6147 160 .00 4. • 160.00 • • A110707 HEATON, EMILY 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 120.00 • 120.00 • • A110708 HEPNER. FREDERICK SR 27855 OI-2420-6599 27 . 00 • 27.00 • • A110709 HIGHLAND; ELAIN KAREN 051089 01-1153-6370 33.82 • • 33. 82 • • A110710 HINDA DISTRIBUTORS; INC. 080439 86-2311-6250-COMM 18. 58 • 18.58 • • A110711 IBM 56956A 65-1191-6397 180.01 • 180.01 • • Al ►O712 JACKSON , DALE IRWIN 05099 01-1123-6599 5.00 • • 5. 00 • • A110713 JANWAY. ULNA 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 120.00 • 120 .00 • • A1 ►0714 JIOINE2. GEORGINA 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 25. 00 • 25.00 ID • • • ' s • MEMBIONINIMMINMIP ill WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 Pria: WAP200P WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 7 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110715 JUNES, CHARLES B APR 89 01-1051-6350 135 ,00 • 135.00 • • All071b KELLEY) KIMBERLY 051589 21-6490-6398-8PSI 120.00 • • 120.00ID • A110717 KENNEDY, CHRIS M. D. FPOS08 19-4140-6350-FP 70.00 • 70.00 • 0 A110718 LILES, GORY 051589 21-6490-6398-85W 12 .50 • 12. 50 0 • A110719 LITTLE THOMPSON WATER 10-89 11-3190-6397-1544 700. 12 0 { i 700. 12ID • • A110720 LOMA, CAMELIA 051589 21-6490-6398-8PS' 120.00 • 120. 00 - __-ID • A110721 LOPEZ . NORA 051559 21-6490-6.398-..8PSI 120.00 • 120.00 • • A110722 LOPEZ, SHERRY 051589 21-6490-6398-85W 12. 50 • 4112. 50 or • A110723 LUUATO, MATT 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 6,25 ID 6 . 25 • - --- • A110724 LOYA GLORIA MG0427 19-4110-6370 40. 20 I • 41 • • • • d li II of i I I _ I I I 11 IP Ill WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 8 • AS OF : 05/ 12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT i 0 A11072♦ LOYA GLORIA 40. 20 • . AI10725 MARTINEZ, BENJIE 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 6. 25 • ID 6. 25 ID • A110726 MARTINEZ , CHRISTINA 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 25. 00 ID 25. 00 • A110727 MARTINEZ , PAULINE 051589 21-6690-6398-8PS1 60.00 • 60.00 O ID A110728 MASCARENAS, TONI 051589 21-6490-6398-8Y10 105.00 • ill 105. 00 s • A110729 MCOOWELL , SHERRY 050889 65-1191-6214 8. 50 11 8. 50 • ID A11073O MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 240334 77-5300-6345 15 . 96 • 77-5310-6345 15. 96 Ill 31 . 92 A ID A110731 MILLER, MIKE 048020 79-2110-6143 85.00 0 85 .00 • ill A110732 MOORE PRODUCE 12514 21-6600-6222-9 234 .32 ID 21-6600-6229-9 94.50 ID 12676 21-6600-6222-9 108.28 21-6600-6229-9 - 34 .00 • ID 471 . 10 • ID ill • • 1 • • WAP2OOP WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 9 IP AS OF : 05/12/49 ID WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OUJ PROD AMOUNT Ill IP 4110733 MURGAN SOIL CONSERVATION 89-2 01-9020-6599 100.00 100.00 IP ID A110734 NAGLE) JOHN TODPRE 19-4130-6350-TOB 150.00 ID 150. 00 • A110735 NATIONAL ASSOC, OF COUNTY CCSIIS 01-1014-6330 25.00 . • 25.00 • --- • A110736 NEVAREZ, AMA 051589 21-6490-6398-8P51 60 ,00 • 60.00 41 Ill Al ►0737 NORTH CULU MEDICAL CENTER 439457 19-4130-6350-TP 29.75 e 24. 75 • O 4110734 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER 16781A 11-3140-6340 23.6041 • 23 , 60 ID ID 4110739 UCHOA. NARY 051589 21-b490-6398-8PS1 120 . 00 • 120. 00 O • A110740 PALACIOSj JUAII 051589 21-6490-6398-8YTU 120.00 • 120 .00 • • Ill A110741 PANSUPHLC SYSTEMS INC . 003263 65-1191-6397 2 ,700. 00 • 2 ,700.00 • ---- • A110742 PEREZ LINDA MI0489 21-6480-6372-8 83. 15 ID 41 • A • • 41 ID WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 10 AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OOJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110742 PEREZ LINUA 085453 21-6480-6377-8 45.00 • 128. 15 • • A11074 $ PCRKINSI SCOTT M00505 19-4170-6J70-W 19.60 • 0505 19-4170-6370-F J3.80 0506 19-4170-6370-S 48.40 • • 0507 19-4170-6370-P 9 , 60 050d 19-41706370-2 5.00 • 116.40 • • A110744 PETTY CASH BLDG 6 GRND5 10715 01-1061-6235-CC 1 .44 • 10745 01-10b1-6360-CC 4.76 10984 01-1061-6360-CC 1 .02 • 11020 01-1061-6360-CC . 36 • 165489 01-1061-6360-CC 1 . 36 20579 01-1Ob1-6360-CC 1.00 • 20581 01 -1061-6360-CC 6. 25 • 2410 01-1061-6360-CC 1 .85 26318 01-1061-6234-CC 4. 75 • 5400 01-1061-6360-CC 2. 39 • 62A001 01-1061-6360-CC 4,76 90977 01-1061-62J5-CC 4.8b • 91113 01-1061-6235-CC 6.91 • ♦3. 73 • • A110745 PHILLIPS bb COMPANY 79d395 77-5310-6250-JEIA 5,305.02 • 77-5310-6250-100L OId16.03 • 77-5310-6599 2,892. 28 77-5310-6599-PHIL 71530.93- • • 9,482.40 • • 4110746 PISANAI FRANCISCO 051589 21-6540-6398-9 155.00 • 155.00 • • A110747 PISANOp UELURAS 051589 21 -64906398-8PSI 120. 00 • 120.00 . Ill • • • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 ID WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 11 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FU DEPT 083 PROJ AMOUNT ID • A110748 PITNEY DUKES 443578 01 -1031-6350 110.00 110,00 • • A110749 PLUCKER. ARTIE 051589 21-6490-6398-8YT0 61 .68 • • 61 .68 A110750 PONY EXPRESS COURIER 509473 19-4170-6350-A 10.00 19-4170-6350-LMS 10.00 • 19-4170-6350-W 10.00 30 ,00 • A110751 POTTER WESLEY M60428 19-4170-6370-E 575,21 • 0128 19-4170-6370-W 72.20 0228 19-4170-6370-P 187. 77 ID 0328 19-4170-6370-5 24.80 • 0429 19-4170-6370-2 248.80 0430 19-4170-6370-A 6, 20 • • 1 , 114 .98 • • A110752 PRICE LYNN 4113 79-1191-6147 50.00 4114 79-1191-6►47 50.00• 4115 79-1191-6147 50.00 . • I50.00 A110753 PUBLIC SERV COMPANY OF CO 051089 01-2330-6340 81 . 33 . 81 , 33 • • A110754 PUDLIC SERVICE CO OF COLD 0424 11-3140-6340 224.32 5655 01-1Ob1-6340-ROAD 4 ,51 • il 228.83 • A110755 PUBLIC SERVICE CO OF COLD 042589 11-3140-6340 2.74 • • • 41 • d I I i I I I I I .I I I Y I I i I I i I I I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r P N 11 II 11 II 11 I I 1 0r a II N 111 II 0 O 11 O O n 0 O II O 01 O Of Jf 0 I 0 000000 N. N N N II N N n 0 N II O O n 0 O II 0 01 0 O 1 N NI X) 0134000, N 2 Z • II • • II • • II • • 11 • • 11 • • I • • I • • I • • • • .• C J N II .0 a 11 N N II N 'A 11 a a 11 0 Of 0 0 1 a 01 0 IB 0 P r '•I n \ a O II II N U1 n 4 4 If 0 O II a ° I 0 .0 I I ♦ n a — r r N K C II II II II N N II I I I O a a 11 it II II II I I 1 I II II II 11 II I I I •. •. II II 11 II II I I 1 II II II II II I I 1 W W II II II II II I I 1 f 0 of II II II II I I I a s II II II II II I I 1 0 0. n II II II II I I I - 0 -. 1 3 r 0 N S a O In > 0. 0. rn W 0. m to P m 'A Q U. N 1 0. CC r a J 0. I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C m CO 0 m 9 m C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 7 P P O P P P P A 1. A . A . . Z m r1 In n n n n n n n n n n n n o '0 o 0 0 .0 a a 0 0 4 a 0 a .0 1- I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z h. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J0. 7. P r d P P P APP I• I• P f. U' W ♦ 4 'A y1 t d 4 U0 `0 a 1 •0I a I I a aI I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CO r N .• r .. - PP it. P PPP II. N N N N N N N r a P 1 WO N. 4 a Pa P a a a N > N N 0 W CO m 0 m C m m O N .• .• is m N to P N in A in N a A 00 P O •• ZGC \ Or .• O r .4 r r 00000 rr J J in J A A O 0 0 A ill lC 'A 41 06 O a 0 ZZ Z 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 Z000000 o 0 0 o O o O U 1- .. O X J J a Y. J W C O 0 U sa u a N J , a w 2 O `• LW o 3- 13 a W ❑ W w I.• a U U > C W Ja r •• r W S W r > J C C a a r Z 11 0 a w 1 7 U a a is co 1 C W 0 .. 3 J U M N 0 w a .. J 0 W .• S •J m N N ✓I JJ 11I J C a Z 7 O O t7 J r a w .. .. ; z z z - a o > J a a a a a •• 0. a C. 7 a a cc a a a C. I- a in a A a P 0 r N n 0 2 w 'A 0 N U1 N a a a a o a m f. A P. I. A N r r r N C L 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 C. a 0 w r r - r r r r a a Z r r r r r r w Z I a a a a a a a a a • • • • 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 13 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT UBJ PROJ AMOUNT • A110763 RINEOOLU, ALICE 185. 20 • • A11076♦ ROUBIQ, LYNN M40505 19-4170-6370-W 21 .80 • 0505 19-4170-6370-P 21 .80 • 0506 19-4170-6370-R 1 .20 OS07 19-4170-6370-F 14.00• 0508 19-4170-6370-S 8.00 4, 0509 19-4170-6370-A 1 . 40 • 68. 20 • • A110765 ROY8AL, RUTH 051589 21-6490-6398-8PS! 90.00 41 90, 00 41 --- • A110766 SALAZAR, VIRGINIA 051589 21 -6490-6398-85.1 6.25 Ill • 6. 25 • • A110767 SALSER, JOANNE 051589 21-6540-6398-9 186 .00 • 186. 00 • A110768 SANCHEL' OSCAR 051589 21 -6490-6398-8PS1 120 .00 • 120. 00 411 • A110769 SAPPINGTON, ROY 051589 21-6540-6398-9 40.00 41 • 40.00 • • A110770 SCHMIDT, JUDY NG0425 19-.4170.-63/0-E 29.58 • 29.58 • • A110771 SCH4ARTZ, :VARY 9596MS 01 -2110-6315-WARR 95. 96 • • 95. 96 • 41, • • 41 • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 41 WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 14 41 AS OF : 05/12/89 41 WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT i NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT UUJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110772 SEKICHI FRED M. 28197 01 -2420-6599 81 .00 41 81 .00 • 41 A110773 SHAMROCK FOOD SERVICE 581797 21-6600-6222-9 457 . 11 • 21-6600-6229-9 83.85 595761 2I-6600-6222-9 417. 14 41 21-6600-6229-9 124.60 • 602401 21-6600-6222-9 710. 74 21 -6600-6223-9 27. 30 a 21-6600-6229-9 20 . 64 41 1 .841 . 38 41 41 • At1077♦ SIERRA. SAMANTHA 051589 21-6490-6398-BPS1 120. 00 41 120. 00 41 • A110775 SIr1ON G SCHUSTER W670NB 52-5510-6322 15 . 62 670M8 52-5520-6322 15. 05 • 67ONBC 52-5520-6J22 15 .61 41 670PB 52-S510-6322 18.05 670Q8 52-5510-6322 16 .05 • 41 67ORB 52-5520-6422 15. 05 749F8 52-5510-6322 12.09 749GB 52-5510-6322 15.82 • • 749H8 52-5510-6422 16 . 95 864JB 52-5510-6422 15 . 82 949J8 52-5510-6322 15. 82 41 • 171 .93 41 41 A110776 SMITH. PAM MG0502 19-4170-6370-W 33. 80 0501 19-4170-6470-F 6,00 41 0502 19-4170-6370-P 1 .40 41 O5UJ 19-4170-6370-R .80 0504 19-4170-6370-A 6. 4041 410505 19-4170-6370-2 . 20 0506 19-4170-6370-5 11 . 60 41 60. 20 • • • 41 • • • I I I i I i i i I I i mw ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 15 • AS OF : 05/ 12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FO DEPT ObJ PROD AMOUNT • • AII0777 SPECKMAN WALTER J 049470 79-6950-6143 255.00 • 255.00 • • A110778 STJLL JEFFREY MG0504 19-4170-6370-S 5.80 • 0505 19-4170-6370-A 2.00 • 0506 19-4170-6370-W 3 .40 ID 11 .20 • • AI10779 STONEKING , CINDY 0510MI 01-1041-6370 121 .40 • 121 . 40 • • A110780 STJRCK KENNETH 195 79-1123-6143 75.00 • 75.00 • • A110781 TORRES' ARNALDO 051589 21-6490-6398-8P51 120 .00 • • 120.00 • • A110782 TOVARI 0EN 051589 21-6490-6398-8P51 60.00 • • 60.00 • A110783 TOWN OF FREURICK LIWT05 01-1061-6342-L10F 29.46 • WTMS1 01-1061-6342-HSFI 29.47 WTMSS 01-1061-6342-HSF2 29.47 • • 4170 01-1061-6341-LIBF 96.44 727 01-1061-6341-HSF2 86.25 9928 01-1061-6341-HSFI 48.62 • • 319.71 • • A110764 TROYER, LISA M.D. F00503 19-4140-6350-FP 82.00 • 82.00 • • • • • • • I • • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 16 • AS OF : 05/12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT • NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110785 UNION COLONY DANK 679159 77-5300-6610 1 ,363.28 77-5300-6620 2,236.72 • 679259 77-5300-6610 2 ,500 .00 • 679559 77-5300-6220 578.45 77-5300-6610 580. 55 • 77-53►0-6610 471 . 17 • 77-5310-6620 369. 83 • 8 ,000. 00 • • 4110786 UNITED BANK OF GREELEY 43089 77-5310-6599 J50. 94 • 350.94 • • A110787 UNITED DANK OF GREELEY 357259 77-5100-6610 528. 16 • 77-5300-6620 680.23 • • _ 1 ,208.39 . A110788 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 321249 77-5300-6345 42. 27 • 864649 77-5300-6345 43.68 • 901002 67-1192-6345-LGCL 78.00 901011 67-1192-634S-LUCL 18.00 • 901239 67-1192-6345-LOCL 47.25 II 901304 67-1192-6345-LUCL 39.75 901319 67-1192-6345-LGCL 29. 25 ID 901320 67-1192-6345-LOGE 29. 25 • 901327 67-II92-6345-LUCL 53.00 901358 67-1192-6345-LOCL 245. 55 • 901375 67-1192-6345-LGCL 87 .60 • 901376 67-1192-6345-LGCL 95. 40 901377 67-1192-6345-LOLL 95. 40 • 901407 67-1192-6345-LOCL 40.25 • 902194 67-1192-6345-LGCL 40.28 902240 67-1192-6345-LGCL 99.00 ID • 19083.93 • • 4110789 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 902324 67-1192-6345-LGCL 72. 25 902436 67-1192-6145-LGCL 95.40 • 902437 67-1192-6345-LOCL 95.40 • 902480 67-1192-6345-LGCL 193 .03 • • • I • • • ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 17 • AS OF : 05/ 12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMDER WARRANT ID NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • --- • A110789 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 902742 67-1192-6345-LOCL 195. 25 902800 67-1192-6345-LOCL 14. 00 • 90286S 67-1192-6345-LOLL 18.00 • 902866 67-1192-6345-LOCL 18.00 902966 67-1192-6345-LOCL 47.75 ID 702967 67-1192-6345-LOCL 47. 75 902968 67-1192-6345-LOCL 47 . 75 904168 67-•1192-6345-1.0 153. 54 ID 904322 67-1192-6345-LD 4 . 41 • 67-1192-6345-LOCL 34. 81 904960 07-1192-6345-LO 153. 54 • 904974 67-1192-6345-LD 153.54 • 907508 , 67-1192-6345-LO 14. 73 67-1192-6345-LOCL 34.27 • • 1 ,392. 42 • • A110790 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 907774 67-1192-6345-LO . 32 67-1192-6345-LOLL 34.81 • 907888 67-1192-6345-LO . 16 • 67-1192-6345-LOCL 39. 16 914149 77-5300-6345 100. 95 • 77-5310-6345 100. 95 • 960149 77-5310-6345 47 .08 971349 77-5300-6345 41 . 00 • 364. 43 • . A110791 VASQUEZ, JUAN 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 12.50 • 12. 50 • • A110792 VIALPANU0, MOLLY 051589 21-6490-6398-8YTO 99. 00 • 99.00 • • • A110793 VONFELUT , ANGELA 051589 21-6490-6398-8YTO 24.00 ID 24.00 • • A110794 WALTERS, MARCIA LEA 050989 79-1031-6147 150. 00 • ID • • • • A 7 ID A WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 i WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 16 i AS OF : 05/12/89 i WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT i NUMBER NUMBER Fl) DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • i 41A110794 WALTERS, MARCIA LEA 150.00 41 A110795 WASTE SERVICES INC 41572 22-9540-6395 18.00 i 47983 22-9540-6395 24.00 i 48089 22-9540-6395 24. 00 ♦8141 22-9540-6395 12.00 • 48243 22-9540-6395 7. 00 i 48281 22-9540-6395 9. 00 48370 22-9540-6395 7 ,00 i ♦6432 22-9540-6395 6. 00 i 48443 22-9540-6395 24. 00 48629 22-9540-6395 15. 00 i 48700 22-9540-6395 18.00 i 48772 22-95406395 12 .00 48831 22-9540-6395 12 .00 • 48849 22-9540-6395 15.00 i 48964 22-9540-6395 30 .00 48975 22-9540-6395 8.00 4.s 241 .00 i • A110796 WASTE SERVICES INC 48978 22-9540-6395 9 .00 49001 22-95406395 12 .00 i 49082 22-9540-6395 24 .00 i 45. 00 • i A110797 WELD COUNTY REVOLVING 2913 21-6490-6372-8 20 .80 i 21 -6490-6373-8 13 . 00 i 2►-6490-6377-8 68 .54 2972 21-6490-6398-8YTU 75. 00 i 2980 21-6920-6373-9 30.00 i 207 , 34 41 71110798 WIGGINS TELEPHONE ASSU 042889 ► t-3140-6340 369. 60 i 41 469.60 • • A110799 WRIGHT, CHERYL M60412 19-4110-6370 7.40 41 i l i S ID • 1 II _. I i - Paw ID • WAP200P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 19 • AS OF : 05/ 12/89 • WARRANT PAYEE INVOICE ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NUMBER NUMBER FD DEPT OBJ PROJ AMOUNT • • A110799 WRIGHT, CHERYL 7 . 40 •A110600 ZAMARRIPA . ZILSEN 051589 21-6490-6398-8SW 25.00 • - 25.00 • • A110801 ZAMORA. REBECCA 051589 21-6490-6398-8YTO 120,00 • 120.00 • • A110802 ZEHRBACH, DENISE 051589 21-6540-6398-9 71 .00 • • 71 . 00 • FINAL TOTAL : 47 ,247.08 • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • I • • I • • • • • • '. 4, 41 WAP2O0P WELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/$9 • WARRANT REGISTER PAGE : 20 41 AS OF ; 05/12/69 41 41 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAI ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROUECURES HAVE BEEN 41 COMPLETED UN THE ABUVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 19 , AND 41 DATED 05/ 12/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD 8E TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT s__QZjj lQK . 41 DATED THI _ th u /OF _ Macy 1989___. 41 • - -!�---_- 41 - DIR CT R OF INANCE AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES 41 SUBSCRIBED AND SHORN TO DEFAME ME THIS ___1Ut$ DAY OF __Sy l9 It_ 6 • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Mr Ca,vr,$4)AE Lk 1 950 . • NOTARY IC 0 — WE, THE UDARO OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY 41 41 ( APPROVE) ( OISAPPRUVE) THE CLAIMS AS SEE FORTH ABOVE; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFURE ARE HEREBY ORUEREU DRAWN UPON 41 THE General FUND — TOTALING $__47..24242.8 4, 41 DAT THIS 15 DAY OF Ha& 19_212__• e • COUNTY CLA=RK AM) RECQRUER UV• •• - 4911:-.22.c_t_C_‘_ ge_I-Leak_ ..etefreet-c-,/�! DEPUTY • _ CHAIRMAN'....224-11.°1-- 41 emjliCti'll'ME H /, *test- 41 MEMBER 41 4/7i egaL/C11A-- E- fi MEMBER MEMBER • • 0 41 41 41 • • w s WWP952PD HELD COUNTY DATE : 05/12/89 • COIN WARRANT REGISTER SUMMARY REPORT PAGE : i • PAYROLL DATE 0S/12/89 • • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ALL ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN • COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE LISTED CLAIMS AS SHOWN ON PAGE I THROUGH 7 1 AND • DATED 05/12/89, AND THAT PAYMENTS SHOULD BE TO THE RESPECTIVE VENDORS IN THE • • AMOUNTS SET OPPOSITE THEIR NAMES, WITH THE TOTAL AMOUNT $ 17,161.00 . • DATED THIS f 5th ' D Y p,.// May 1989 • DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINI RATION SERVICES • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 15th DAY OF Mat 19 89 . • MY GOMMI SS ION EXPIRES MY Commission Exoireslune_% 1990 , • • • NOTARY—PU IC • WE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, HEREBY ® • (APPROVE ) ( DISAPPROVE ) THE CLAIMS AS SET FORTH ABOVE ; AND WARRANTS IN • PAYMENT THEREFORE ARE HEREBY ORDERED DRAWN UPON • THE Social Services FUND - TOTALING 617,161. 00 • • DATED THIS 15th DAY OF _ May 19 89 ,COUNT CLERK AND RECORDER BY • 4. • �_ -444L-4.11-4-1- --L y.�,ij!�1LL1- __l. ac �-�DEPUTY --_- ze,z I CHAIRMAN •41 41 MEMBER - "�1tZFx3s.eXT�{�f/J`l 0 MEMBER 41 z6i/iizzi air-S-eatit- MEMBER MEMBER • • • • • • • • • 4w,a ,5//5/8 ? V203P COLLECTION OF CLERK FEES 05/04/89 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER MONTH: APRIL YEAR: 1989 ITEMS TOTAL STATE COUNTY CLERK FEES ' TOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT LICENSE FEES 11321 173216.39 120537.89 40977.50 11701.00 OWNERSHIP TAX 11321 441876.97 7255.00 427366.97 7255.00 SME RENTAL 0.T. 96 2298. 10 2250.10 48.00 VEH RENTAL 0.T. 0 1075.46 .00 1075.36 .00 PERMITS 2017 1746.50 578.05 1168.45 SALES TAX 0 163801.34 157197.60 6603.74 TITLES 4311 23390.50 10681 .00 12709.50 ID'S 57 199.50 114.00 85.50 CHATTELS 1386 10472. 00 10472.00 DUPLICATE REG 41 82.00 82.00 FICHE 0 .00 .00 CERTIF . G OTHER 39 73.25 73.25 PENALTIES 0 .00 .00 SME RENTAL TADS 12 60.00 36.00 24.00 DIESEL (COUNT) 0 EMISSION FEES 2934 2053.80 2053.80 SHORT CHECKS 10 150.00 150.00 . OTHER 0 .00 .00 SUB TOTAL 33545 820495.71 296399.54 471669.93 52426.24 'CORDING DEPARTMENT UCC INDEX 570 1910.00 1910.00 GEN INDEX 2891 16120.00 16120.00 DOC FEES 227 1870. 15 1870.15 SEARCH G CERT 172 1693.00 1693.00 MICROFILM 11 4465.00 4465.00 CERT COPIES 124 286.25 286.25 NON CERT COPIES 2393 11103.00 11103.00 MARRIAGE LIC 68 680.00 204.00 476.00 PHOTO COPIES 0 .00 .00 RECEIVABLES 0 .00 .00 OTHER 1 90.00 90.00 SW) TOTAL 6457 38217.40 204.00 38013.40 LERK TO THE BOARD MAPS 32 64.00 64.00 PHOTO COPIES 35 37.00 37.00 OTHER 1 1.00 1.00 SUB TOTAL 68 102.00 102.00 LECTION DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION 33 16.50 16.50 MAPS 9 18.00 18.00 LISTS 3 102.39 :02.39 OTHER 1 125.00 125.00 - SU8 TOTAL 46 261.89 261.89 PR GRAND TOTAL 40116 859077.00 296603.54 471669.93 90803.53 EAR-TODATE TOTAL COLLECTIONS MOTOR VEHICLE 130800 3319330.09 1162282.81 1952421.20 204626.08 RECORDING 21810 124106.25 678.00 123428.25 CLERK TO BOARD 193 370.25 370.25 - ELECTION 227 1006.42 1006.42 TO GRAND TOTAL 153030 3444813.01 1162960.81 1952421.20 X�32299431.00 RS 30-1-114 A ,��,,,qqq. A Y N FEUERSTEIN 'EVISED 7/84 "Wi('{ y0' 5 4) WELD MINTY CLERK AND RECORDER if , IMV203P COLLECTION OF CLERK FEES 05/04/89 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN - WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER YEAR-TO-DATE THRU APRIL FOR YEAR: 1989 ITEMS TOTAL STATE COUNTY CLERK FEES 0TUR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT LICENSE FEES 44238 713750.42 503904.42 163814.00 46032.00 OWNERSHIP TAX 44238 1831038.97 28070.50 1774897.97 28070.50 SME RENTAL 0•T. 283 7489.22 7347.72 141.50 BEM RENTAL O.T. 0 6361.51 .00 6361.51 .00 PERMITS 7735 6582.50 2205.25 4377.25 SALES TAX 0 611027.67 586845.64 24182.03 TITLES 16264 88272.00 40341.00 47931.00 ID'S 185 647.50 370.00 277.50 CHATTELS 5586 42850.00 42850.00 - DUPLICATE REG 148 296.00 296.00 FICHE 9 900.00 900.00 CERTIF. C OTHER 140 263.50 263.50 PENALTIES 0 .00 .00 - SHE RENTAL TABS 182 910.00 546.00 364.00 OIESEL (COUNT) 0 EMISSION FEES 11744 8220.80 8220.80 SHORT CHECKS 48 720.00 720.00 OTHER 0 .00 .00 SUS TOTAL 140800 3319430.09 1162282.81 1952421.20 204626.08 - ECORDING DEPARTMENT UCC INDEX 2251 7615.00 7615.00 GEN INDEX 11261 65851.00 65851.00 DOC FEES 832 6572.65 6572.65 SEARCH C CERT 779 7808.00 7808.00 MICROFILM 30 11457.60 11457.60 CERT COPIES 472 1287.00 1287.00 _ NON CERT COPIES 5946 20771.00 20771.00 MARRIAGE LIC 226 2260.00 678.00 1582.00 PHOTO COPIES 8 4.00 4.00 RECEIVABLES 0 .00 .00 - OTHER 5 480.00 480.00 - SUB TOTAL 21810 124106.25 678.00 123428.25 :LERK TO THE DOARU MAPS 101 205.00 205.00 PHOTO COPIES 90 109.25 109.25 OTHER 2 56.00 56.00 _ SUB TOTAL 193 370.25 370.25 ELECTION DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION 196 98.00 98.00 MAPS 15 30.00 30.00 LISTS 9 466.42 466.42 OTHER 7 412.00 412.00 - SUB TOTAL 227 1006.42 1006.42 fTD GRAND TOTAL 153030 3444813.01 1162960.81 1952421.20 329431.00 /EAR-TO-DATE TOTAL COLLECTIONS MOTOR VEHICLE 130800 3319330.09 1162282.81 1952421.20 204626.08 RECORDING 21810 124106.25 678.00 123428.25 CLERK TO BOARD 193 370.25 370.25 ELECTION 227 1006.42 1006.42 - (TO GRAND TOTAL 153030 3444813.01 1162960.81 1952421.20 329431.00 Zet° ,Sal L4Lct(._ - :RS 30-1-114 MARY A N FEUERSTEIN iEVISED 7/84 WELD LINTY CLERK AND RECORDER - mEm®RAnIDum 40. To one Clerk to the Board May 9, 1989 George Goodell, Director of Road and Bridge COLORADO From Road Opening subject The following road was opened May 9, 1989. It was closed May 1, 1989 for a bridge replacement. WCR 46 between WCR 55 & WCR 57 GG/mw:frc xc: Commissioner Lacy Weld County Dispatch Weld County Sheriff's Office WCR 46 WCR 55 WCR 57 • 94u l idtS 4' A G END A WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 16, 1989 Planning Commission Members are reminded that you are to call BOBBIE GOOD 356-4000, Extension 4400, if you cannot attend the luncheon and/or meeting. 12:00 noon - Weld County Planning Commission Luncheon - May 16, 1989, Raddison Inn, 701 8th Street, Greeley, Colorado * * * * * * * * * * is * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1:30 p.m. - Public Meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission, County Commissioners' Hearing Room (#101) , 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. ROLL CALL ' Bud Halldorson, Chairman Ernie Ross, Vice-Chairman Jerry Burnett Lynn Brown Rick Iversor. Jerry Kiefer LeAnn Reid Ivan Cosnell Ann Garrison 1. CASE NUMBER: Z-449 (continued from May 2, 1989 meeting) APPLICANT: Harold Reese, Jr. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10, and part of the NE; of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25. 2. CASE NUMBER: USR-878 (continued from May 2, 1989 meeting) APPLICANT: Daniel Ochsner and Barry Payant REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a recreational facility located in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE} of Section 31, part of the SE} of Section 30, and part of the SW? of Section 29, all in T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 700 feet south of the Town of Evans, approximately 2,100 feet north of the Town of La Salle, west and east of U.S. Highway 85, and north of Weld County Road 394. 3. CASE NUMBER: USR-879 APPLICANT: Brett Wayne Branch REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a heliport in the A (Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E} NE: of Section 3, T4N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado — LOCATION: Approximately 3 miles southeast of Kersey; south of Weld County Road 50, west of Weld County Road 57 II lr JJ Diversified Operating Corporation May 3, 1989 Mr. J.R. Kearns Production Manager Rocky Mountain Region Marathon Oil Company P.O. Box 2690 Cody, Wyoming 82414 RE: Sooner Unit Dear Sir: After repeated calls to your staff engineers, Joe Bata and Dave Malady we have received your letter of April 25, 1989, in response to my Plan of Operation letter, dated February 28, 1989. The Plan of Operation proposed implementation and construction of the flood unit. A vote, pursuant to the Unit Operating Agreement, Section 7.13 Article 7, which you and your staff took months of time to change, modify, and alter was required prior to construction. Your letter did not address the question. Does Marathon Oil Company agree or not agree, as a working interest owner, to proceed with the detail plan, engineering, and implementation of the Sooner Unit Plan of Operation? Diversified Operating Corporation, as unit operator, will not proceed with ordering equipment until your approval is received and the cash call for construction is made and received. Marathon Oil Company took from April 1988 to October 1988 to modify and change the original operating agreement. From November 1988 to January 1989 the Sooner Unit #1-20 was recompleted in the "J" Sand to determine if a sufficient water supply was present. From February 28th to present Marathon Oil Company has neither approved or disapproved Diversified Operating Corporation's Plan of Operation. We believe that it is in the best interest of all working interest and royalty owners to proceed with this waterflood project. Time is of the essence. When I personally met with you and your staff in Cody, Wyoming in April of 1988, I emphasized that the project was extremely time and cost sensitive. I believe that if we are going to waterflood we must begin as soon as possible. If Marathon does not want to proceed, several parties have expressed interest in buying Marathon's interest. Other parties want to terminate the unit if Marathon continues to delay any action. If Marathon Oil Company continues to do nothing, I will request an emergency hearing with the COGC, in order to resolve the issue. fl Vn ".ii Hudson's Day Centre•Suite 1900.1600 Stout Street•Denver,Colorado 80202.3031595-3957•FAX 303/595-0429 0 �N2A00/e9 4 Marathon Oil Company May 3, 1989 Page Two All operators, since first examining and evaluating the viability of waterflooding have agreed: 1 .) That water supply would be critical and a minimum of 1500 bwpd injection rate would be required. We believe that volume is available. 2.) Withdrawal rates would be minimal until fillup and gas resaturation are obtained and always subject to review. 3.) BHP and tracer surveys would be required to determine if the flood is operating as modelled. Diversified Operating Corporation openly welcomes your thoughts and opinions, if they move this project to fruition. If continued modelling and "what if-ing" is for the sole purpose of delaying action, we all have better things to do with our limited time and resources. Regarding accounting issues, I have been informed by our controller, Ted Drake, that Marathon Oil Company as a 38% working interest owner owes some $35,277.11 of past due JIB's. If there are questions on your billing we want to answer and rectify the disputed items. We also want to pay our vendors whom worked on the Sooner Unit (/1 -20. Your letters of February 13, 1989 and April 25, 1989 stated that you were not receiving monthly operating reports. Cheryl Cattau, our production secretary, has sent them to Joe Bato in Cody, and sent duplicate copies to Ms. Joan Butchart, also in Cody. Ms. Mollie Bee Dozier, operation's secretary, also facsimiles NCRA crude purchaser statements to Mr. Jay Waddell in Findley, Ohio. If such reports are being sent to the wrong personnel, please so advise. In closing, I thought that Marathon's purchase of P.E.C.'s interest would expedite and enhance the Sooner Unit waterflood project. Much to my dismay, your company has been the major obstacle in installing and operating the project. I look forward to a more willing and helpful attitude in seeing the project through. The Sooner Unit is of major importance to many participants, even though it may be nothing to Marathon Oil Company. Sincerely, DIVERSIFIED OPERATING CORPORATION r .y Terry . Cammon Mans; of Operations cc: Bill Smith, COGC All Working Interest Owners All Royalty Interest Owners T__ r,• �. �� -I_:PHONE 203)866-2371 \, _ SL`.Ri.DD TO 77 7.ROPERTv TA',,AT_ N Ta1RNT OF LOCAL -(7PAIP,S _HERMAN .S . . ROOM 4 •) vVEP. •CCCS M1'; ,Tt,N NOS .'- NS. %C. I22-01-)91-01 L:OUNTY WELD ^ARCEL ID NO, 29610530400 THE YATT7.7. CE: 77 ,AP"',,li„1NC nMMITT- _ D50661 -" .2"i"'C . EXEMPTION M 1XATTCN CF THE OLLCWING PROPERTY: P. 10, _ _ - ,C .CT •,IE. IN '_ mPPC\EMENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY ; ON THE BASIS OF THE REPORTS / 1D "P'IPICATICNS FILED BY THE NAMED OWNER, THE ADMINISTRATOR HAS DETERMINED, PURSUANT TO ??"^ "^S 39-3-101 (1 ) (g) ( 1) THAT 1,00,00% OF THE ACTUAL VALUE OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS E' :1.:?,.' 'C,R ExEMPTION AS BEING OCCUPIED BY PERSONS QUALIFIED UNDER ^ARACRAPH C. THE REMAINING SUCH VALUE IS SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENT AT THE APPLICABLE RATE AND SHOULD BE PLACED ON '`SESSMENT ROLL FOR 1989. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS 9th DAY OF may , 19 _ DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION /LW MARY ANNE MAtRER, PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR (SEE REVERSE FOR APPEAL RIGHTS) (COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR. TREASURER ANO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) NOTICE OF RIGHT TO A PUBLIC HEARIN¢ It is the right of the owner listed on the front side of this form, if he disagrees with the decisions referenced herein, to request a public hearing with the Property Tax Administrator or her representative. If you wish to request_ such a hearing, please call this office at (303) 866-2686. Or write the Division of Property Taxation, Exemptions Section, 1313 Sherman St. , Room 419, Denver, CO 80203. Hearings are scheduled during the third full week of each month, between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. You should schedule your hearing as soon as possible after receipt of this decision in order to protect your rights. At the end pf 60 days from the date of this decision, unless a hearing has been scheduled and/or evidence provided, the determination will automatically be considered final. If you schedule a hearing, please plan to submit documentation or otherwise demonstrate that the exempt/taxable percentages referenced in this decision are incorrect. APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS In, ,ddition to the right .to a public hearing within the Division of Property TaXation, '39-2-117 (5) (b), C.R.S. also provides that any decision of the administrator may be taken to the Board no later than 30 days following the FINAL decision of the administrator. After your public hearing, and once you have received the Division's FINAL decision, if you still disagree, you may appeal that decision, within 30 days, to the Board of Assessment Appeals at 1313 Sherman St. , Room 523, Denver, 80203. Phone Number: (303) 866-5880. 1 I 042589 7 I ?. TELEPHONE FORM 905 STATE OF COLORADO (303) 866-2371 CL,; ;DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION TO 1;; ';j DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS 419 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 80203 DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF: Faith Messianic Fellowship APPLICATION NO. 87008 International , Inc. FILE NO. 62,-01.-424 2418 19th Avenue COUNTY Weld Greeley, CO 80631 PARCEL NO. 62-0961-1.8-3-211909 FOR EXEMPTION FROM GENERAL TAXATION OF PROPERTY CLAIMED TO BE OWNED AND USED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR STRICTLY CHARITABLE PURPOSES. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Or Sr-1 L1 Ridge sub % 2418 19th Avenue. PERSONAL PROPERTY IS INCLUDED, AND IS GRANTED/DENIED EXEMPTION IN THE SAME PERCENTAGE AS THE REAL PROPERTY. LEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY IS NOT INCLUDED. THE ADMINISTRATOR, HAVING REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AS PROVIDED IN COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 39, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 117, HAS DETERMINED THAT SUCH EXEMPTION IS JUSTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW, AND EXEMPTION IS HEREBY GRANTED, THE SAME TO BE EFFECTIVE February 28, 1989. DATED AT DENVER, COLORADO THIS 5th DAY OF May , 19 89 MA-4_44 (Lla.i.131A444.41 PROMARY ANNE MAURER PERTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR (SEE REVERSE FOR APPEAL RIGHTS) (COPIES TO OWNER, ASSESSOR, TREASURER AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) NOTICE OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES RIGHT TO APPEAL Colorado Revised Statutes 1973, Title 39, Article 2, Sec 117 (5) provides, 'an appeal from any decision of the Property Tax Administrator may be taken by the Board of County Coemd ssioners of the county wherein such property is located. or by any owner of taxable property in such county, or by the owner of the property for which exemption is claimed if exemption has been denied or revoked in full or in part. Any such appeal shall be taken to the Board of Assessment Appeals, and shall be taken no later than thirty days following the decision of the Property Tax Administrator.' Forms and instructions for making such appeal may be obtained from the Board of Assessment Appeals, Department of Local Affairs, 420 State Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street, Denver, CO 80203. Telephone (303) 866-5880. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EXEMPT PROPERTY OWNER Owners of property granted exemption by this office must do the following :a maintain their property's exemption from taxation; I. Notify this office within tjlrty davl of any change of mailing address, or status or usage of the exempted property (i.e., land has been sold and/or vacated and is no longer used; . Property transferred by deed will be returned to the tax rods :y the county assessor. II. Each year following the year in which exemption is granted. owners of such exempt property must file an annual Exempt Property Report on or before April 15. These reports are supplied Py tae. Division of Property Taxation early each year. This nivilip, of Pronertv Taxation take no reyip^Q1h111fy fns re' rrl "PT 'ea.- +, a tlmeiv manner for aqv reason. It is the responsibility of :-e exempt property owner to see that these reports are received. completed and returned to the Division of Property Taxatton annually by April 15, and with the appropriate. filing fees. Contact this office if your reports are not received in time for completion by the April 15 deadline each year. On ail future correspondence regarding this property, the owner should ref', to the file number shown on this determination. DTNNTC C r. of cow Colorado Department of Local Affairs �e^:.fir$ ,y %DIVISION OF PROPERTY TAXATION Mary Anne Maurer * • Property Tax Administrator /876 Roy Romer May 9, 1989 Governor Mr. Robert J. Loew City Attorney City of Greeley 1000 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Loew: Since we have never dealt with a problem such as that posed by the taxability of Energy Factors Cogeneration Plan, we were in error to ever give you an estimate as to a tentative completion date. As you point out, when Richard Timberlake called you after your April 26 letter, he gave you no decisive answer. As soon as there is a decision, you will be the second to know. Energy Factors will receive the first communication. Sincerely, J ��✓I-vt-<—�,G MARY ANN MAURER Property Tax Administrator cc: Weld County Assessor Weld County Commissioners✓ Energy Factors MAM:vjn 1313 Sherman Street, Room 419, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303) 866-2371 rn 1282:7t7/192 • Highway Colorado Department of Highways . ` ��! 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO. 80222 For More Information: 157-9228 #89-18 MAY 4, 1989 COMMISSION SCHEDULES ALAMOSA MEETING, SPRING ROAD TRIP TO SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO State Highway Commissioners have scheduled a May 19 meeting at the Alamosa Holiday Inn, as part of a Spring Road Trip touring - southwestern Colorado. The meeting will begin at 8 a.m. in the Alamosa Room of the Inn, located at 333 Santa Fe Avenue. Each spring and autumn the Commission' s road inspection tour allows the 11-member policy board to review firsthand the road and - bridge needs, or construction projects. in a quadrant of the - state. For this trip a chartered bus tour will leave Denver Thursday. May 18 and end in Durango Sunday, May 21. Some of the Department of Highways top administrators, along with invited legislators, will accompany commissioners on a tour which includes Wolf Creek Pass on U.S. 160; a proposed future site for the Department's Durango district headquarters: Cortez and the Four Corners area: and a U.S. 666, S.H. 184. S.H. 145 loop near Arriola and Dolores. - At the Alamosa meeting commissioners will consider a resolution to reorganize the Department of Highways, and will consider changing the format for the commission' s county hearing process which in recent years has sought county officials' road and bridge priorities during sessions held in Grand Junction, - Pueblo and Denver. Legislation pending in the Colorado General Assembly regarding transportation issues will be discussed, as will matters of local interest to the San Luis Valley and southern Colorado. Following a half day session the meeting will adjourn for lunch and the continuation of the weekend tour by charter bus. (over) �,,�fir°' 0 Highway News Page 2 LITTLETON RAILROAD DEPRESSION WINS NATIONAL ENGINEERING AWARD The Littleton Railroad Depression, allowing auto traffic to go over trains which run through town about 30 times a day, won a Grand Award in the American Consulting Engineers Council 's 22nd annual Engineering Excellence Awards competition. The project, which relocated 9,000 feet of railroad track and resolved a long-standing conflict between auto and railroad traffic in downtown Littleton, was designed by Centennial Engineering of Arvada. The firm had already won contests at the state level and then competed in a field of 124 entrants to win nationally. This year the design competition recognized 21 winners - one Grand Conceptor, five Grand Awards and 15 Honor Awards. Collaborating with Centennial Engineering on innovative financial planning were the Denver and Rio Grande Western, and Atchison-Topeka and Santa Fe railroads; the Regional Transportation District: City of Littleton; and the Colorado Department of Highways. The project posed a number of complex challenges. For example, although 400 feet of shale has eroded from the current railroad site, the stress from its massive weight was locked in the underlying shale. Centennial designed a mechanically stabilized embankment (MSE) retaining wall along 5,000 feet of the cut to accommodate retaining wall soil movement and protect adjacent bridge abutments from the locked-in stress. Also, a creek had to be carried pver the depression. To handle this, a flume was built over it with a 25-foot stair step drop structure to dissipate some of the water energy. This year ' s project entries were judged by 23 of America 's leading government officials, federal agency executives, journalists and industry representatives. Criteria included outstanding engineering achievement, the unique application of technology, cost savings to clients and attention to environmental and social concerns. TRANSPORTATION WEEK ACTIVITIES PLANNED Governor Roy Romer has proclaimed May 12 to be Good Roads Day, and May 14-20 to be Transportation Week. Accordingly a number of events, tours and displays have been arranged by industry groups and public agencies in the Denver area to help celebrate transportation in Colorado. (more) Highway News Page 3 Good Roads Day began in the days when Coloradans were first building and paving roads by state action, replacing various toll roads and trails. A 1911 statute passed the legislature whereby the second Friday in May would be observed by the people of this state "in the discussion of public highways and in the construction and repair of the same for the benefit and advancement of good roads. . .and in such further efforts and undertakings as shall be in harmony with the general character of the day so established. " National Transportation Week, in recent decades, has promoted much the same cause for all modes of travel. While many activities involve schools, events open to the public in the Denver area include: Saturday Regional Transportation District Open House May 13 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. RTD's Platte River Facility for bus operations. 3333 Ringsby Court. Contact Connie Sesser, 573-2137. Various buses will be on display. Tuesday A-1 Aurora Relocation Services Open House May 16 4 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. 11701 East 33rd Ave. , Aurora Contact Kirby Henderson, 364-2684 Friday RTD East Metro Bus Garage May 19 9 a.m. until 1 p.m. I-225 at Colfax Avenue in Aurora Tours of the largest bus maintenance facility in America. Contact Connie Sesser. 573-2137 Saturday TRAIN EXPO '89 at Denver 's Union Station, 17th May 20 and Wynkoop. Railroad equipment and engines. . .model Sunday trains. . .trolleys. . .railroadiana. May 21 Saturday 10 a.m. til 5 p.m. , Sunday 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Contact Ed Henderson 455-3933. The governor 's proclamation appears on the back page of this Highway News issue. (over) Highway News Page 4 CONSTRUCTION BIDDING ACTIVIy FOR MAY 4 PR 014-2(17) S.H. 14 EAST OF FORT COLLINS Bridge replacement and reconstruction on S.H. 14 in Weld county, which includes grading. aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, plant mixed seal coat, concrete box culverts, signing, striping, topsoil, seeding and mulching, beginning about eight miles east of Fort Collins and extending 3.7 miles east. Number of bidders: Six (6) Apparently successful bidder: $1,938,837 from Sterling Paving Company of Fort Collins Calls for completion within: 140 working days Preconstruction Project Manager: George R. Rowe Resident engineer: Owen Leonard, Loveland MP 05-0025-06 I-25 NORTH OF RATON PASS Interstate 25 slide repair north of Raton Pass. which includes filter material , steel piling and placement of timber cribbing, located about eight tenths of a mile north of the Colorado/New Mexico state line Number of bidders: Ten (10) Apparently successful bidder: $50.438 from HLM Construction of Swink Calls for completion within: 15 working days Resident engineer: Bill Rizley, Pueblo 176-1(177) I-76 AT I-25 NORTH OF DENVER I 76-1(127) New bridge construction at Interstates 25 and 76 north of Denver, combined projects which consist of grading, bridges, hot bituminous pavement, lighting, storm sewer. guardrail, retaining wall, seeding and mulching, in Adams county. Number of bidders: Ten. one bid was rejected Apparently successful bidder: $5,099,369 from Centric/Jones Constructors of Denver Calls for completion within: 395 calendar days Preconstruction Project Manager: David Stevenson Resident engineer: Skip Hied. Denver (more) Highway News Page 5 RIDS TO RE OPENED NEW: MAX 25. 9:ZO a.m. t resurfacing and bridge replacement on S.H. 113 north of U.S. 138 in Logan county, combined project for 12. 9 miles of hot bituminous paving and striping north of U.S. 138 and bridge replacement nine miles north of the junction along a 2. 1 mile segment, which includes grading. hot bituminous pavement. plant mixed seal coat, drainage, bridge, concrete box culvert. seeding, mulching, striping, fencing and guardrail. CXBRF-CX(S)13-0113-05 and MP 13-0113-06. 9:45 a.m. , raised median and safety work on Garrison Street in Lakewood for a tenth of a mile north of West Alameda Avenue. consisting of curb and gutter. sidewalk, drainage, hot bituminous pavement, striping, and seeding, in Jefferson county, H05 0006(38) . 10:90 a.m. . channeling the U.S. 40, S.H. 14 junction near Muddy Pass for safety, in Jackson and Grand counties, a Set-Aside project for minority firms, which includes grading, aggregate base course, hot bituminous pavement, seeding, mulching, drainage, lighting and guardrail, PR 040-2(24) . Certified. preeualified minority bidders only. 1Q:15 a,m, t resurfacing Hampden Avenue and South Havana St. in Denver and Aurora, which is S.H. 30, which includes planing, hot bituminous pavement overlay, plant mixed seal coat and striping, beginning at Interstate 25 and extending about 3.9 miles easterly to S.H. 83 (Parker Rd. ) in Denver and Arapahoe counties. CX 01-0030-03. 10:30 4.m. . signalization at Arapahoe Road and South Yosemite St. in Arapahoe county, HOS 0006(37) . (over) Highway News Page 6 STATE OF COLORADO INICUOVi cmuuen t]e State C,p11M ' Owns,Colombo 101014 792 MOW(30$%i47e11 Ow) .W Nome Gassor HONORARY PROCLAMATION GOOD ROADS DAY May 12. 1989 and TRANSPORTATION WEEK May 14-20, 1989 WHEREAS, the economic well-being of Colorado depends on a sound and reliable transportation systm; and WHEREAS, Colorado statutes provide that the second Friday in May each year oe set aside for Good Roads Day; and WHEREAS, the workers of the transportation industry also should be recognized for their outstanding contributions to the daily needs of Coloradans; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Roy Romer, Governor of Colorado, proclaim GOOD ROADS DAY MAY 12, 1989 and TRANSPORTATION WEEK May 14-20, 1989 in the State of Colorado. GIVEN under my hand and the Executive Seal of the State of Colorado, this twenty-first day of March, 1989 „COVE 04D, OnneAs. s iss Roy Raver Governor 3Nw; 47 NATURAL ENERGY RESOURCES COMPANY - - - - ,-. P.O.Box 567 • Pelmet Lac Colorado 80133 • (719)481-2003 FAX(719)481.4013 May 5, 1989 Senator Bill Armstrong Representative Joel Hefley Washington, D. C. 20510 Washington, D. C. 20515 Senator Tim Wirth Representative Dan Schafer Washington, D. C. 20510 Washington, D. C. 20515 Representative Hank Brown Representative Pat Schroeder Washington, D. C. 20515 Washington, D. C. 20515 Representative Ben Campbell Representative David Skaggs Washington, D. C. 20515 Washington, D. C. 20515 Dear Senators and Representatives: Request an immediate Congressional investigation into the omission of several major ongoing alternatives in the Metro Denver Water Supply Final Environmental Impact Statement. This alternatives "oversight" is a gross violation of the Congressional mandated National Environmental Policy Act. The Union Park Reservoir and Siphon, City-Farm Recycling, and Green Mountain Pumpback alternatives were improperly screened by the Corps of Engineers from detailed EIS review, while being aggressively pursued by Arapahoe County, City of Thornton, and the Denver Water Department respectively. Valid engineering studies show that each of these overlooked water projects would be substantially more economical and less environmentally damaging than Denver ' s controversial 50 ' year Two Forks Dam proposal . Because of the national environmental significance of Two Forks, a Congressional investigation would serve as an important adjunct to EPA's pending veto of the project. Please advise . SincerelynA4 Allen D. (Dave) Miller President ADM/bm cc: U. S. Congressional Delegates, EPA, Governor Romer, Colorado Legislators. c/' v G 1� 5,10 is NAYWRAL �NERGY RESOURCES COMPANY P.O.sok;567 Palmer Lake.Colorado 60133 • (719)461.2003 • FAX(719)461.4013 0 May 5, 1989 Mr. Gary E. Cargill Regional Forester, U. S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region 11177 West 8th Avenue Lakewood, Colorado 8O225-0127 Dear Mr. Cargill : Thank you for your letter of April 27, 1989, requesting our input for the U. S. Forest Service's updating of its Rocky Mountain Planning Guide. We believe the most pressing Forest Service need is adoption - of a clear policy that requires balanced use of the region's renewable water resources. This policy would serve as a basic screening criteria for all water projects requiring Forest Service participation in the environmental review process. If Colorado and the Forest Service had a balanced water use policy, Denver' s proposed Two Forks Dam would not be considered a viable project. All of Colorado's nineteen transmountain diversion projects are already seriously dewatering the Upper Colorado Basin. Meanwhile, the untapped Gunnison Basin loses almost a million acre feet of Colorado entitled water to the down river states . This serious water development imbalance would only be worsened with Two Forks and its follow-on Upper Colorado . expansion projects planned by the Denver Water Department. Highly competent engineering studies show Arapahoe County's ongoing Union Park Reservoir and Siphon Project from the untapped Gunnison to the South Platte can economically meet Denver's future needs . This massive, high altitude, off-river reservoir will enhance the environment, because it will also provide needed drought protection for Colorado' s major rivers on both slopes . The Corps has confirmed that Union Park's unique multiplier effect can increase the safe annual yield of Denver ' s existing system 40% more than Two Forks for about 60% of the cost. Two Forks is the best case for a balanced water use policy for Colorado and the U. S. Forest Service. The Two Forks EIS is not a valid decision document, because the Gunnison and other superior alternatives were purposely ignored to protect an obsolete concept. Two Forks seriously violates the time honored principle requiring balanced use of our natural resources. Sincere a2- -S )j' Allen D. (Dave) Miller, President ADM/bm cc: Gov. Romer, Colorado Congressional Delegation, EPA, USFS. ,0 UNITED STATES i / •• ft NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' G e WASHINGTON,0,C.20555 C,L c-., TO pie ot May 1, 1989 $� • DOCKET NO(S). 50-267 Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations Public Service Company of Colorado Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 SUBJECT: FORT ST. YRAIN NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information. O Notice of Receipt of Application, dated O Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated ❑ Notice of Availability of Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement No. dated • Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, dated O Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License or Amendment to Facility Operating License, dated XQ Bi-Weekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Operating Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations, dated 4/19/89 (see pagels)] 15846 El Exemption, dated • Construction Permit No. CPPR- , Amendment No. dated El Facility Operating License No. , Amendment No. dated • Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated [] Monthly Operating Report for transmitted by letter dated (] Annual/Semi-Annual Report- transmitted by letter dated Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures: As stated cc: w/enclosure See next page I Ji Mr. R. 0. Williams, Jr. Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain CC: Mr. D. W. Warembourg, Manager Albert J. Hazle, Director Nuclear Engineering Division Radiation Control Division Public Service Company Department of Health of Colorado 4210 East 11th Avenue P. 0. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80220 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Mr. David Alberstein, Manager Mr. Charles H. Fuller Fort St. Vrain Services Manager, Nuclear Production GA International Services Corporation and Station Manager Post Office Box 85608 Public Service Company of Colorado San Diego, California 92138 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Resource Mr. P. F. Tomlinson, Manager Management Division Quality Assurance Division Public Service Company of Colorado Public Service Company of Colorado P. 0. Box 840 16805 Weld County Road 19-1/2 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Platteville, Colorado 80651 Senior Resident Inspector Mr. D. 0. Hock U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission President and Chief Executive Officer P. 0. Box 640 Public Service Company of Colorado Platteville, Colorado 80651 Post Office Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201-0840 Kelley, Standfield & O'Donnell ATTN: Mr. J. K. Tarpey Commitment Control Program Public Service Company Building Coordinator Room 900 Public Service Company of Colorado 550 15th Street 2420 W. 26th Ave. Suite 100-0 Denver, Colorado 80202 Denver, Colorado 80211 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Greeley, Colorado 80631 Regional Representative Radiation Programs Environmental Protection Agency 1 Denver Place 999 18th Street, Suite 1300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2413 I a nn, CC,' ]151130 Fein! Rs*** / Vol 54, No s4 / Wednesday, Apse 19r nee / Noires 7 the Commission's regrletloas in lOCaR C? fan.this means that operation of the TO j • facility in accordance with the proposed amendments would not(1)Involve e significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previooaty evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of a new or different kind of socfdent from any accident previously evaluated;or(3) involve a slgrdficant redaction in a margin of safety.The basis for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown below. The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination.Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination.The Commission will not normally make a final determination unless it receives a request for a hearing. NUCLEAR REGULATORY Written comments may be submitted N CLEAR COMMISSION by mall to the Regulatory Publications Branch,Division of Freedom of Si,eekly Notice ,yam and Information and Publications Services. Amendments to Operating Licenses Office of Administration and Resources Involving No Significant Hazards Management.US.Nuclear Regulatory Considerations Commission.Washington.DC 20555. and should cite the publication date and L Background page number of this Federal Register Pursuant to Public Lew(P.1497415, notice.Written comments may also be the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(the delivered to Room P-219.Phillips Commission)is publishing this regular Building.7920 Norfolk Avenue. biweekly notice.PL 97-425 revised Bethesda.Maryland from 7•.30 am.to section 189 of the Atomic Energy Act of 4:15 p.m.Copies of written comments 1954.as amended(the Act).to require received may be examined et the NRC the Commission to publish notice of any Public Document Room,the Gelman amendments issued,or proposed to be Building.2120 L Street,NW., issued,under a new provision of section Washington.DC.The filing of requests 189 of the Act.This provision grants the for hearing and petitions for leave to Commission the authority to issue and intervene is discussed below. make immediately effective any By May 29.1989 the licensee may file amendment to an operating license upon a request for a hearing with res,ect to a determination by the Commission that issuance of the amendment to the such amendment involves no significant subject facility operating license and hazards consideration.notwithstanding any person whose interest may be the pendency before the Commission of effected by this proceeding and who a request for a hearing from any person. wishes to participate as a party in the This biweekly notice includes all proceeding most me a written petition notices of amendments issued.or for leave to Intervene.Requests for a proposed to be issued from March 25, hearing and petitions for leave to 1989 through April 7.1989.The last intervene shall be filed in accordance biweekly notice was published on April with the Commission's"Rules of 5,1989(54 FR 13758). Practice for Domestic Licensing NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF Proceedings"In 20 CFR Part 2.1f a ISSUANCE OP AMENDMENT TO request for a hearing or petition for FACIISTY OPERATING LICENSE AND leave to intervene is filed by the above PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT date,the Commission or an Atomic HAZARDS CONSIDERATION Safety and Licensing BoardChair designated DETERMINATION AND by the Commission or by the Chairman OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING of the Atomic Safety and Lie Board Panel,will rule on the request The Commission has made a proposed and/or petition and the Secretary or the determination that the following designated Atomic Safety and licensing amendment requests involve no Board will issue a notice of hearing or significant hazards consideration.Under an appropriate order. Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 29. 1988 / Notices ___ As required by 10 CFR 2.714,a If the final determination is that the For further details with respect to this petition for leave to intervene shall set amendment involves a significant action.see the application for forth with particularity the interest of hazards consideration,any hearing held amendment which is available for public the petitioner in the proceeding.and would take place before the Issuance of inspection at the Commission's Public how that interest may be affected by the any amendment Document Room,the Gelman Building results of the proceeding.The petition Normally,the Commission will not 2120 L Street.NW..Washington.DC, should specifically explain the reasons issue the amendment until the and at the local public document room why intervention should be permitted expiration of the 30-day notice period. for the particular facility invo)ved. with particular reference to the However,should circumstances change Arkansas Power&Light Company. following factors:(1)the nature of the during the notice period such that failure Docket No.50-080.Arkansas Nuclear petitioner's right under the Act to be to act in a timely way would result.for One,Unit 2(ANO,2).Pope Comity. made a party to the proceeding;(2)the example,in denting or shutdown of the Arkansas nature and extent of the petitioner's facility.the Commission may issue the property.financial,or other interest in license amendment before the Dote of amendment request the proceeding;and(3)the possible expiration of the 30-day notice period. December 12.1988 effect of any order which may be provided that its final determination is Description of amendment request entered in the proceeding on the that the amendment involves no This amendment would change the petitioner's interest The petition should significant hazards consideration.The ANO-2 Technical Specifications(TS) also identify the specific espect(s)of the final determination will consider all which describe the design features of subject matter of the proceeding as to public and State comments received the Spent Fuel Storage Pool.These which petitioner wishes to intervene. before action is taken.Should the changes will update the TS to conform Any person who has filed a petition for Commission take this action.ft will with Amendment 43 April 15,1983) leave to intervene or who has been publish a notice of issuance and provide which increased the spent fuel storage admitted as a party may amend the for opportunity for a hearing after capacity for ANO-2.This amendment petition without requesting leave of the issuance,The Commission expects that also would make a number of editorial• Board up to fifteen(15)days prior to the the need to take this action will occur clarify ing and administrative corrections prehearing conference scheduled in very infrequently. to the Technical Specifications. the proceeding,but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity A request for a hearing or a petition Remaining issues In the amendment requirements described above. for leave to intervene must be filed with request have been addressed in previous Not later than fifteen(15)days prior to the Secretary of the Commission.U.S. notices. the first prehearlag conference Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Basis for proposed no significant scheduled in the proceeding,a petitioner Washington,DC 20555.Attention hazards consideration determination: shall file a supplement to the petition to Docketing and Service Branch,or may The Commission has provided guidance intervene which must include a list of be delivered to the Commission's Public concerning the application of the the contentions which are sought to be Document Room,the Gelman Building standards for determining whether a litigated in the matter,and the bases for 2120 L Street,NW..Washington.DC,by significant hazards consideration exists each contention set forth with the above date.Where petitions are by providing certain examples(51 FR reasonable specificity.Contentions shall filed during the last ten(10)days of the 7751).One of the examples iI)of actions be limited to matters within the scope of notice period,it is requested that the not likely to involve a significant the amendment under consideration.A Petitioner promptly so Inform the hazards relates to a purely petitioner who fails to We such a Commission by a toll•free telephone call administrative change to technical supplement which satisfies these to Western Union at 1-(800)325-0000(in specifications:for example,a change to requirements with respect to at least one Missouri 1-(800)3424700).The Western achieve consistency throughout contention will not be permitted to Union operator should be given technical specifications,correction of an participate as a party. Datagram Identification Number 3737 error.or a change in nomenclature. . Those permitted to intervene become and the following message addressed to This amendment would correct an parties to the proceeding,subject to any (Project Director):petitioner's name and administrative error in omission of spent limitations in the order granting leave to telephone number.date petition was fuel pool design feature information in Intervene,and have the opportunity to mailed:plant name:and publication the ANO-2 Technical Specifications. participate fully in the conduct of the date and page number of this Federal The new information should have been hearing.including the opportunity to- Register notice.A copy of the petition included in the February 17.1983 request present evidence and moss-examine should also be sent to the Office of the for TS change to reflect expansion of the witnesses. General Counsel.U.S.Nuclear spent fuel pool capacity for the plant If a hearing is requested.the Regulatory Commission.Washington. That requested change was approved in Commission will make a final DC 20555,and to the attorney for the Amendment 43 which expanded storage - determination on the Issue of no licensee. from 485 spaces to 988 spaces.In significant hazards consideration.The Nontimely filings of petitions for leave addition the negotiated sat of editorial final determination will serve to decide to intervene,amended petitions. changes a administrative in nature. • when the hearing Is held supplemental petitions and/or requests The current changes would correct these U the final determination is that the for hearing will not be entertained administrative oversights.end therefore amendment request involves no absent a determination by the appear to be similar to example(1). significant hazards consideration.the Commission,the presiding officer or the Since the application for amendment Commission may issue the amendment presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing involves proposed that are and make it immediately effective. Board that the petition and/or request similar to en example of an action that notwithstanding the request for a should be granted based upon a is considered not to involve significant hearing.Any hearing held would take balancing of factors specified In 10 CFR hazards considerations,the Commission place after issuance of the amendment. 2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v)and 2.714(d). has made a proposed determination that .. I. I i - 15822 Federal Register I Vol. 54, No. 74 / 1•{edne_day. April 19, 1989 / Notices the application for amendment Involves a new or different kind of accident from Cenenc Letter neap the proposed no significant hazards considerations. any accident previously evaluated:or(3) amendment is responsive to industry and Local Public Document Room involve a significant reduction in a NRC efforts on improvements in Technical location:Tomlinson Library,Arkansas margin of safety. Specifications,and will result in a reeowce Tech University,Russellville,Arkansas The Carolina Power&Light Company savings for the licensee and the NRC by 72801 (CP&L)has reviewed the proposed eliminating the majority of license Attorney for licensee:Nicholas S. changes to TS and has determined that amendment requests for change.in value.of Reynolds,Feq„Bishop,Cook.Purcell A the requested amendment does not cycle-specific parameters.in Technical Reynolds.7400 L Street,NW.. involve a significant hazards Specifications.Indirectly.this is a safety Reynolds. 0 20003-3502 improsewent because the released resources consideration as follow.: may now be utilized on more consequential ARC Project Director:Jose A.Calvo Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter tasks. Carolina Power& Limits: Light Compa ny et al" 1•The proposed amendment deep not Deletion of Docket No.50425 and 50.324, involve a significant Increase in probability 1.The Proposed seled amendment does not Bruoewlck Steam Electric Plant.Units or consequences of en accident previously involve a significant increase in the No.1 and 2.Brunswick County,North evaluated,The abnormal operational consequences of any accident previously evaCarolina transients analyzed in the LISP Updated for lAmendment 19 to GBSTAR Evaluation Report concluded LISP application for amendment:amendment: Final Safety Analysis Report will remain Dote of pp bounded.There will be no change In the that a change similar to the proposed change September 4.1987,as supplemented operation of the facility as a result of the "...will.in practice.result In the same April 5. 1988,superseded February 20, amendment,Nu asfety.related equipment or operating power distribution limits and safety 1589.and supplemented March 20,1989. function will be altered.The proposed margins as the current Technical Description of amendment request' amendment merely removes cycle-specific Specifications."The essential redundancy of Based on the guidance provided in NRC parameter limits from the Technical the Linear Heat Generation Rate and the Generic Letter 88-16,the proposed Specifications and references their inclusion Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate, change removes the values of cycle- In the CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. and the equivalence of the formulation of the specific parameter limits from the NRC approved analytical methodology will APRM flow-biased setpoint setdowa Brunswick Steam Electric (BSEP) continue to be used as the basis for the requirement,has been established and is Technical Specifications cns(1 Plant and results that will now be reported in the CORE documented in the NRC Safety Evaluation clhni them Spci the Core d OPERATING(NITS REPORT. Report for Amendment 19 of GPSTAR-I. 2.The proposed amendment dues not Since the same operating power distribution Limits Report(COLR).However,the create the possibility of a new or different limbs as current Technical Specifications COLR will be referenced in the I'S,and kind of accident from any accident previously will,in practice.be required.the proposed will be periodically submitted to the evaluated As stated above,no safely-related change does not involve a significant Commission. equipment safety function,or plant increase in the consequences of any accident In addition,and based on the operations will be altered as a result of this previously evaluated. guidance in the NRC Safety Evaluation amendment.The requested change does not The proposed change eliminates a thermal Report(SER)for Amendment 19 to ante any new accident mode,The proposed performance limit,modifies several General Electric Licensing Topical amendment is in accordance with the definitions and provides an equivalent basis , Report NEectric 11-RA theproposed guidance provided in Generic Letter 8846 for for adjusting APRM flow-biased setpoint changeED - 40 -P-A licensee*requesting removal of the values of letdown based on power distribution Specification eliminates n 3/e BSEP Linear-Heat cycle-specific parameters from Technical parameters.As such the change only affects Specifications.The establishment of these power disMbution parameters which do not Generation Rate(LHGR),and the limits in accordance with an NRC-approved influence the probability of any accident. associated Total Peaking Factor(TPF), methodology and the incorporation of these Therefore,the proposed change does not The use of 1W in the formulation of the limits into the CORE OPERATING lAdl'IS result in a significant increase in the Average Power Range Monitor(APRM) RT l ensure that Mlle steps" probability of any accident previously flow-biased scram and rod block been taken to stabore,the thesu valuemittal of the evaluated. - limitsetpoint letdown requirements of CORE OPERATING LAB1S REPORT to the 2.The proposed change does not alter the Specification 3/4.2.2 is being revised Commission will allow the Staff to continue function of any component or system and along with associated definitions that to trend the values of these limits without the therefore,does not agate the possibility of a are added,deleted,or revised.The need for prior Staff approval of these limits new or different kind of accident from any associated revision of Technical and without introduction of an;previewed accident previously evaluated. Specification 3/4.2.1 specifies that only safety question. 3.The margin of safety,as established by the most limiting lattice Average Planar 3.The proposed amendment does not alter current Technical Specification power Linear Heat Generation Rate(APLHGR) the requitement that the plant be operated distribution limits,are(SICI based on the limit for multiple lattice fuel types will within the limits for cycie•■pecifc parameters assumptions and analyses documented in the be specified. nor the required remedial actions that must OSEP Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. Basis for proposed no significant be taken if these limits am not met While it The proposed amendment will.in practice. _ is recognized that such limits are essential to result in the same power distribution limits as hazards consideration decerminotion: plant safety,the values of such limits can be contained in current Technical Specifications; The Commission hasprovideddoes of determined in accordance with IvRC• therefore.the proposed change not standards for determining whether a no approved methods without affecting nuclear involve a significant reduction in the margin significant hazards consideration exists safety.The removal of the values of these of safety. as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed limits from the MEP Technical Specifications The staff has reviewed the CP&L amendment to an operating license is coincident with their Incotponrion Into the determinations and is in basic involves no significant hazards CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT that is parametnter with them.C ele rencednc consideration if operation of the facility submitted appropriate the measures exist to Hence, parameter limits will be referenced In in accordance with the proposed exist to control the the TS.but will be located in a licensee amendment would not(1)involve a values of these limib.Therefore,the proposed changes are administrative in controlled document instead of located significant increase in the probability or nature and do not impact the operation of the in the TS.The linear heat generation consequences of an accident previously facility in a manner that involves a reduction rate limit is essentially redundant to the evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of in the margin of safety.Indeed,as stated in average planar linear heat generation • Federal Register / VoL 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. i9e0 / Notices ___ rate Limit and the latter limit will be Specification LCO ice vales of-40 pear F The NRC staff has made a preliminary retained. c atl� ender r at review of the licensee's no significant Local Public Document Room allowed insertion limiati ort oomi ing ion(sunb u r rods hazards consideration determination location:University of North Carolina at and agrees with the licensee's analysis. Wilmington.William Madison Randall presare and xenon end ardal offset Accordingly.the Commission y • Library,901 S.College Road, variations)that the acted MFC with notproposes Wilmington.North Carolina 25403.3297, exceed they detain a value.Henn.,here is no to detenain that the requested °� effect on any design basis accident and no amendment does not involve a Attorney for licensee:R.E.Jones, increases in the consequences of any detigtt significant hazards consideration. General Counsel,Carolina Power& basis accident associated with this Technical Local Public Document Room Iight Company,P.O.Box 1551,Raleigh. Specification change, North Carolina 27902. For LOCA analyses(large end smell location:Cameron Village Regional NRC Project Director. Elinor C, break),the only significance of a change to Library 1930 Clark Avenue.Raleigh. Adensam MTC would be to the extent that it may effect North Carolina 27805. generated decay heat.The reactivity Attorney for licensee:R.E.Jones. Caroline Power&Light Company, assumptions in the large break and small General Counsel.Carolina Power& Docket No.50.400,Shearon Heyde break LOCA accident analyses assume a Light Company.P.O.Box 1551,Raleigh. Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 1,wake and maximum decay heat generation according to North Carolina 27602 Chatham Counties,North Carolina the requirements of Appendix K. Dole of amendmentConsequently,any changes to the Sift NRC Project Director.Elinor C. request February would show no erect for the large end small Adensam 22.1989 break LOCA analyses. �a Power*Light Company. of amendment request: As stated above.the safety analysis The proposed amendment would change assumption remains conservative with Docket No.5000,Shearon Harris Technical Specification(TS)3/4,1.1.3, respect to the proposed LCO limit value of 40 Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 1,Wake end 'Moderator Temperature Coefficient," pcm/'F.Therefore•the proposed change In Chatham Cm itlaa.Nato Carolina to allow a more negative moderator the LCO limit from.42 pcm/e F to-40 pai/'F temperature coefficient(MTC)to the still assures that the accident analyses Date of amendment request February moderator temperature coefficient is not 22.1989 Limiting Condition for Operation.1$ exceeded.The proposed changes do not Description of amendment request 3.1.1.3b,and in the associated impact the eemem veoces of any design basis The proposed amendment would revise Surveillance Requirement,TS 4.1.1.3b. accident Also.there are no failure modes Surveillance Requirement 4.9.8.2 to Basis for proposed no significant therefore, associated�tt e in delete the residual heat removal(RF(t) hazards consideration determination. flow requirement whenever the water The Commission has provided probability or consequence.of any accident previously evaluated. level is below the reactor vessel flange. standards in 10 CFR 50.92(c)for 2.The proposed amendment does not Currently.Surveillance Requirement determining whether a dg hazards consideration exists.A create the possibility of a new or different 4.9.8.2 requires tbst at least one RHR kind of accident There la no change in the loop be verified in operation and proposed amendment t0 an Operating plant design or in operating preceding, circulating reactor coolant at a flow rate License for a facility involves no Additionally,there are no new failure modes of greeter than or equal to 2500 gpm at significant hazards consideration if introduced by the proposed changes operation of the facility in accordance therefore,there can be no impact on plant least once per 12 hours when the reactor with the proposed amendment would response to the point where a different is in Mode 8 with irradiated fuel in the accident is created vessel and the water level above the top not;(1)involve a significant increase in 3.The proposed amendment does not of the reactor vessel flange is lees then the probability of consequences of an involve a significant reduction in a mergin of 23 feet.The 2500 gpm flow requirement accident previously evaluated.or(2) safety.The proposed changes have no impact would be maintained when the water create the possibility of a new or on the consequences of an accident or on any level is at or above the reactor vessel different kind of accident from any of the protective boundaries.The bun to the flange.The associated gases section accident previously evaluated.or(3) MTC Technical Specification 3/4.1.1.3 states would also be revised to reflect this involve a significant Suction in a "The limitations on moderator temperance margin of safety. coefficient(MCC)are provided to ensure that change. As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a).the the value of this coefficient remains within Basis for proposed no significant licenser,has provided the following no the limiting condition assumed in the FSAR hazards consideration determination: licensee hazards ed the f adon accident and transient analyses."The The Commission has provided sIgproposed changes continue to satisfy this standards in 10 CPR c for determination: statement The deMitlon of the meet listing determining whether5a ) cant 1.The proposed amendment does not condition assorted la the safety analyses Issignificant involves significant Increase in the changing from an extremely conservative and hazards consideration exists.A probability or consequences of an accident unrealistic assumption of Hot Full power proposed amendment to an Operating previously analyzed.Accident analyses do (HFp),all rods in(ARp,to a Moat Negative License for a facility involves no not explicitly input an MTC.but rather a Feasible MTC approach.The Most Negative significant hazards consideration if constant moderator density coefficient Feasible MTC still provides a conservative operation Of the facility in accordance (MDC).Converting the MDC used in the estimate of the worst MTC and the revised with the proposed amendment would accident analyses to an MCC is a straight limits still provide aseursou that thermion not. 1 involve forward calculation which accounts for the used in Ibe safety etelyssa remain bousdkig ( ) a consequences cesofincrease in rate of change of moderator density with compared to those which may be experienced the dent fry of consequences of an temperature at the conditions of Interest under real accident conditions.Based on the accident previously evaluated,or(2) namely,Hot Full Power(HF7).For those non- above discussion,there is no aignillcent create the possibility of a new or — LOCA transients where analysis results are reduction in the margin of safety. different kind of accident from any made more severe by assuming maximum Based on the above,the licensee has accident previously evaluated.or(3) — delta K moderator feedback,a constant SOC of 0A3 concluded that the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction la a delta K/gm/oe has been assumed to exise throughout the transient Convmttn margin g this to a meets the three standards in 10 CFR of safety. limiting MTC at HFP conditions gives about• 50.92 and.therefore,involves no As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a).the 58 pcm/'F.The proposed Technical significant hazards consideratiaL licensee has provided the following no a 15824 Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 1989 / Notices significant hazards consideration RHR pump provides adequate flow to ensure Technical Specification Tables 3.3-1 and determination: mixing and prevent stretlfeatloa"No Mods 4.3-1.as requested in Generic fetter 83• 1.The proposed amendment does not 5 minimum flow rate ts established in 09 for Reactor Trip involve a significant Manse in the Specification 3/4,4.1.Therefore,as long aSystem Automatic Actuation using shunt trip coil probability or consequences of an accident the RCS water twills belowthe reactor previously evaluated vessel flange a minimum flow requirement is attachments. The existing requirement of Specification not necessary either In Mode 5 or Modes. Basis for proposed no significant 3/4.9.8.2 that at least one RHR loop be in Upon railing the water level above the hazards consideration determination: operation ensures that(1)sufficient cooling reactor vessel flange,the proposed The staff has evaluated this proposed capacity Is available to remove decay heat Surveillance Requirement 4.9.621 will be in amendment and determined that it and maintain the water in the reactor vessel effect and require s minimum flow rat.of involves no significant hazards below 14011 es required in Mode e.and(2) 7500gpm•Al nth'the MCI"amendment considerations.According to 10 CFR sufficient coolant circulation is maintained will not result in the plantt(pliq ppaced a a 92 G through the core to minimise the effect of a condition not currently alloweddwlutg Mods ( ).a proposed amendment to an boron dilution Incident and prevent boron a operation and therefore,dose not create operating license involves no significant stratification.The Mode 0 minimum flow the possibility of a new or different kind of hazards considerations if operation of limit of 2500 gpm was established to alleviate accident the facility in accordance with the fl the potential for boron stratification under 3•Eliminating theRIM minimum RIMow limit • tproposed amendment would not refueling conditions.However,achieving 2500 of 2500 Dm when the RCS water level le 1.involves a s cant increase!n gpm flow rate at the reduced water levels of below the reactor vessel flange does not fi mid-loop operation could cause cavitation involve a significant reduction in the margin probability or consequences of an and eventual damage of the RHR pumps, of safety.As stated above,the Mode 0 accident previously evaluated:or Boron stagflation Is only•concern with theminimum flow limit of 2300 gpm was 2.Create the possibility of a new or large volumes of water present when the established to alleviate the potential for different kind of accident from any refueling cavity Is filled.Sufficient mixteg boron stratification under refueling exists,even at low Rt02 flow rates.toconditions.Boron stratification is only a accident previously evaluated:or preclude boron stratification when the water concern with the 1 volumes of water 3.Involve a significant reduction in a lever is below the reactor vessel flange. present when the refueling cavity is filled margin of safety. Administrative controls to isolate potential Sufficient mixing exists,even at low RHR The proposed changes requested have sources of non•borated water from the flow rates,to preclude boron stratification been evaluated as presented below: reactor,established m Technical when the water level is below the reactor The automatic actuation of the Specification 9/4.9.1,prevent a boron dilution vessel flange.In addition,the proposed (i) event while in Mode 6 Since boron amendment does not result In the plant being shut trip coil attachment provides an stratification la note at reduced RCS placed in a condition not currently allowed alternate method to open the reactor trip water inventories and the concernpo at red fore by the existing Mode a Surveillance coil breakers.When a reactor trip signal Requirement 4.4.1.4.2 Therefore,the a generated there are diverse boron dilution event is precluded by ovide a reactor reTvision to elminiate the minimum flow ification 3/4.94.the plimitt sed s cant reduction in the margin of safety. break result in a er sms tO tripwhich would minimize the when the RCS water level is below the Based on the above,the licensee has possibility of an Anticipated Transient reactor vessel nAnge does not significantly concluded that the proposed amendment Without Scram(ATWS)occurring.The increase the probability or consequences of meets the three standards in 10 CFR proposed changes revise the an accident previously evaluated. 50.92 and.therefore,involves no surveillances t0 require independent 2.The proposed amendment does not significant hazards consideration. testing of the undervoltage and shunt create the possibility of a new or different The NRC staff has made a relimine kind of accident from any accident previously review of the licensee's no significant rY step coil attachment for the manual evaluated The proposed amendment splits hazards consideration determination reactor trip and the reactor trip the existing surveillance requirement into breakers. two separate surveillances,'The first. and agrees with the licensee's analysis. These surveillances provide ,621.Is Accordingly,the Commission proposes Surveillance Requirement 4.9 e assuranc of reactor trip breaker applicable when the RCS water level is at or to determine that the requestedoperab assure y when required there above the reactor vessel flange and amendment does not involves are now two diverse trip .Since ince isms.a maintains the 2500 gpm minimum flow limit. significant hazards consideration. Change is also proposed to allow forty- The second.Surveillance Requirement Local Public Document Room eight(48)hours to e one of the trip 4.9.8.2.2.1s applicable when the RCS water location:Cameron Village Regionalle features when it becomes inoperable. ga below�reaRHR vessel�flange and LibNor 1930 Clark 7 Avenue,Raleigh, before a reactor shutdown is required. re requires loop North Carolina f icens operation and circulating reactor coolant at This is conservative because It Attorney Jonas, least once per 12 hours.tThisis I new recognizes that there are two trip _ surveillance requirement la identical to the General Counsel.ang. Carolina Power& mechanisms instead of one and allows existing Mode 0 Surveillance erenc Requirement Light Company,P.O.Box 1551,Raleigh, forty-eight(481 hours to restore the 4,4.1.4.2.the only difference being the plant North Carolina 27002 inoperable trip feature.This change is mode.That Is,prior to de-tensioning the NRC Project Director.Elinor C. reactor vessel head closure bolts with water Adensam based on the allowable time referenced in the NRC Generic Letter 85-09. temperature less than 140'F the plant Is in Mode 3.Upon detensloning of the bolts,the Commonwealth Edison Company, Removal of note 14,for the Braidwood plant is in Mode O.There is no change M Docket Noe.50454 and 60.455,Byron Technical Specifications is reactor vessel water level,however,et ode Nuclear Station,Unit Nos.1 and 2.Ogle administrative in nature. - point the existing Surveillance Requirement County.Illinois:and Docltat•Noa.50•x58 (21 The proposed changes do not 4.9.0.2 establishes a minimum flow rate of and 30.457,Braidwood Station.Unit change the manner in which the reactor 2500 gpm.This minimum flow requirement is Nos.i and 2,Will County,Illinois protection system provides plant not necessary when the water level is below Date of application for amendments: protection.The addition of surveillance the reactor vessel flange as demonstrated M the Bases for Specification 3/4.4.1.Reactor December 2,3,1987,supplemented April test requirements provides assurance Coolant Loops and Coolant Circulation. 3.1989. that the Reactor functions will occur which states that.M Mode 5,"...the Description of amendments request: when required.Present plant equipment operation of one reactor coolant pump or one The proposed amendment would revise is not being altered to accommodate _- _ — a Federal Register / VoL 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1989 / Notices 1.582.5 them changes,hence.no new failure Amendment 32 for Unit 2-NPF-18),the NRC Project Director,Daniel R. mechanisms are introduced. MAPLHGR limit curves for fuel type Muller (3)The proposed changes are 8CRB290L were drawn to the same Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power expected to increase the overall margin exposures(30,000 MWD/STU)as the Plof safety because they provide periodic initial cycle fuel curves for NeckPlan �Haddam Plant, test requirements for the Reactor Trip simplification,The GE analyzed Breakers.These proposed surveillance exposure range of up to 44.500 MIND/ ��tkyuet a1 t NNuclearoo 50245,1my changes are designed to provide STU(49A GWD/MTU)was reviewedDocket assurance of operability of the reactor and approved in those submittals(GE 'Ind 10421.nix Not 1 Nurlrr trip and bypass breakers.Based on the "Supplemental Reload Licensing Power Station Unit Noe, .2.and,,New preceding assessment,the staff believes Submittal"documents 23A1843 and London County,Connecticut these proposed amendments involve no 23A4735 for Units 1 and Z respectively), Date of amendment request March 13. significant hazards consideration. Redrawing of these curves is an 1969 Local Public Document Room administrative change only.and will Description of amendment request By location:For Byron Station,the adequately reflect the analyzed an application dated Mash 13,1989. Rockford Public Library,215 N.Wyman exposure range of the 8CR$299L bundles Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Street,Rockford,Illinois 81101;for throughout their useable bundle lifetime. Company(CYAPCO)and Northeast Braidwood Station,the Wilmington Energy Company(NNECO) Township Public Library.201 S. Basis for consideration proposed nosignificant proposed ose Kankakee Street.Wilmington. The has provided deternoa'an: to ( S)d the the Haddam echal Illinois The Commission Specifications 80481. (15)of a Neck Attorney to licensee:Michael Miller. standardssignificant for ands consideration ration whether existso and amendment Millstone Units would 2 and 3 Figure Esquire:Sidley and Austin.National as stated in 10 CFR 50n A ipr The tio ."and Figure 0.2- as stated 10 CFA 50.92(c). proposed 1,"Offstta Organization."Plaza,Chicago,Illinois 60603. a �••and Figure a2 NRC Project Director.Daniel R. amendment tov an operating tlicense azfor a 2. ni Organization."scam the Muller facility involves no significant hazards Technical Specifications and would consideration if operation of the facility revise TS section a to require the Commonwealth Edison Company, in accordance with the proposed inclusion of these organizational charts Docket Not.50.373 and 50.374,LaSalle amendment would not:(1)involve a in the Quality Assurance Topical County Station,Unit Nos.1 and 2, significant increase in the probability or Report. LaSalle County,Illinois consequences of an accident previously Basis for proposed no significant Date of application for amendments: evaluated;or(2)create the possibility of hazards consideration determination: January 30,1ia$0 a new or different ldnd of accident from The Commission has provided Description of amendments request an accident previously evaluated:or(3) standards in 10 CFR 50,92(c)for The proposed amendments to Operating Involve a significant reduction in a determining whether a significant License No.NPF•il and Operating margin of safety. hazards consideration exists.A License No.NPF-18 would revise the The licensee has determined,and the proposed amendment to an Operating LaSalle Units 1 and 2 Technical NRC staff agrees,that the proposed License for a facility involves a no Specifications by revising the amendment will not significant hazards consideration if MAPLHGR Limits Curves to reflect the 1.Involve a significant increase in the operation of the facility in accordance higher nodal exposure values for probability or consequences of an with the proposed amendment would specific fuel types. accident previously evaluated because not(1)involve a significant increase in The MAPLHCR limit curves of these restrictions on power distribution the probability of consequences of an Technical Specification 3.2.1 for both are based on analysis performed with accident previously evaluated(2)create Units 1 and 2 are being redrawn to the NRC approved methods and are the passibility of a new or different kind reflect higher nodal exposure values for provided to ensure that these of accident from any accident previously fuel types SCRB178,8CRB219,and consequences of accidents remain evaluated,or(3)involve a significant BP8CRB299L.The purpose of the within the existing criteria for LaSalle. reduction in a margin of safety. revision is that the full analyzed range 2.Create the possibility of a new or CYAPCO/NNECO has reviewed the of nodal exposures was not previously different kind of accident from any proposed change and provided the reflected and operation during Cycle 3 accident previously evaluated because following analysis.The change would of each unit is expected to go beyond the proposed revisions place restrictions not the limits of the existing curves. on power distribution thus eliminating 1.Involve a significant increase in the The MAPLHGR limits of Technical new or different kinds of accidents from probability of aacwmce or consequences of Specification Figures 3.2.1.1 and 3.21.2 those previously analyzed. an accident Prevlot+ly analyzed.The depict the maximum allowable Average 3.Involve a scant reduction in pi°pos°d changes are strictly administrative Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate for the margin of safety because the In :aim''This adsdobtio occurrence will the the specific fuel types as a function of specification revisions provide increase the t of an de u or the nodal exposure.The exposure limitations on the power distribution aannallyzed tat of°°accident pml0cely dependent limits are analyzed by GE intended to ensure that the ECCS and 2.Create die poedbility of a new or and approved by the NRC through fuel thermal mechanical criteria different kind of accident from any reviews of General Electric Standard continue to be protected. previously analyzed.Since there we no Application for Reloads(GESTAR).The Local Public Document Room changes in the way the plant Is site Technical Specifications then location:Public Library of Anna Valley potential for an unanalyzed accident the Is not provide a controlling document to reflect Community College,Rural Route No.1, meated.No new failure modes are these analyzed limits. Ogeleby.Illinois 01348. ia�i t at ven haven chaaec■are During the Cycle 2 reload licensing Attorney to licensee:Michael!.Miller, administrative and have no affect on plant submittals for both LaSalle units Esquire;Sidley and Austin.One First operation,3.Involve a significant reduction in a (Amendment 40 for Unit 1-NPF-11. National Plaza,Chicago,Illinois 00803. margin of safety.The proposed changes MIS Federal Ratite' / Vol. 54. Nos 74 / Wednesday. April W. Mg I Notices remove ike atlas mad mute orenhaton inning no alimiflcant hazards clarifications end editalai 0eerections charts from the Technical Specifications end c0, S.stm.Under the Commission', to the Radiological Pf Event Technical are strictly administrative.Similar regulate:as to 10 CPR SOM.this mean Specification(MSS. oremna sa than ate manned to the QA the opent oa of the to Basis ropiestRgmrt.which u updated awully. ��f for proposed no significant Since the proposed*eases do sot affect the accordance with the proposed hatter&consideration deranninotion: consequences of any accident previously amendment world not(1]involve a The CotmdsNon has provided analysed.there is no reduction in the margin signScant Macaw n the probebilty or standards for detentning whether a of safety. coneegwooas of en accident previously significant beards eaosideration exists The Cammiaeion staff has reviewed evaluated a(2)attic the possibility of as stated in 10 CPR Part 30.9210)•A and egress with the CYAPCO/NNECO a new or different kind of accident from proposed amendment to an operating analysis and believes that the licensees any accident previously evaluated:or(3) license for a facility involves no have ma the three criteria for a no involve a significant redaction N■ significant hazards consideration if significant hazards consideration, margin of safety.The 90mmi s1on has operation of the facility in accordance Accordingly,the Commission ppropose@ evaluated the proposed changes against with the proposed amendment would to determine that this change does not the above mints as follows: not:(1)involve a significant increase it involve a significant hazards A.The changes do not involve■ the probability or consequences of an consideration. significant increase in the probability or accident previously evaluated;or(2) Local Public Document Room consequences or an acc)deat previously create the possibility of a new or location:Fussell Library,123 Broad evaluated because the Alternate different kind of accident from any Street Middletown.Connecticut 09457 Shutdown System design provides a accident previously evaluated:or(3) and Waterford Public Library,42 Rope means to control auxiliary feedwater in involve a significant reduction in a Ferry Road.Waterford Connecticut the event of a Ike in the control room margin of safety. 08385. which results in loss of control from the The licensee has evaluated the Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield, main control room of the earbine.ddven proposed changes against the above Esquire.Day.Berry&Howard auxiliary feedwater pump.A third standards as required by 10 CFR Counselors at Law,City Place,Hartford. auxiliary feedwater pump provides a 50.91(a).The Commission's staff has Connecticut 09173.3499, separate injection path to the steam reviewed the licensee's evaluation end NRC Project Director::John F.Stolz generators in the event of a fire at the agmn with it. Consumers Power Company,Docket No. Alternate Hot Shutdown panel which The licensee has concided that: - . Po Pandas Plant.Van Buren results in loss of control of the normal (1)The proposed flanges do not twelve s County.Michigan auxiliary feedwater pumps.Therefore. significant increase is the probability or since a postulated fire cannot disable consequences of an accident previously Date of amendment request: the auxiliary feedwater function.the evaluated.The changes ere administrative in November 21,1985 change does not involve a significant natwe in that they:(a)clarify the existing Description of amendment request: increase in the probability or requite vents for sampling service water The proposed amendment would revise consequences of an accident previously tiler-hens(or effluents):(b)remove the the provisions in the Palisades Plant, evaluated, surveillance requiteroetts for the quarterly Technical Specifications Ms)with the B.For the same reasons as cited in testing of the Iii Raga Noble Cu Monitor addition of new sections relating to the paragraph A above,the change does not a thha ipkat ci canec arab v editorial anon Alternate Shutdown System. create the possibility of a new or in Technical Specification(1S)Amaadment Specifically.the proposed amendment different kind of accident from any e5.Nona of these changes impact on plant would add Section 3.25,Alternate accident previously evaluated. design or operation and asasegeesdy the Shutdown System,which would require C.The change does not involve a previously evaluated accidents are not the operability of the Alternate significant redaction in a margin of altered Shutdown System whenever the reactor safety because the Alternate Shutdown (2)The proposed changes do rot create the coolant temperature reaches or exceeds System provides assurances of the poasibny of a new er different kind of 325'F.Tin section sped8cally auxiliary feedwater function in the accident from say accident prvetoesly identifies the minimum equipment to be event of a fire that disables normal evaluated dace.as stated to(1)above,rite operable,their locations and action to control of this fraction.Therefore,the changes are adonis weave and qui emaru be taken in the event of inoperability of clarify sw(u water asspliag requieemamta any specified equipment y margins of safety associated with and/or correct aaiMina TS ado c The proposed amendment would also operation of the plant are unchanged (3)The proposed chance do cot involve a add Section 4.20 which would require Local Public Document Room significant reduction in a margin of safety q location:Van Zoeren Library,Hope since.as stated in(1)and(2)above,the performance of periodic surveillance College.Holland,Michigan 49423, changes are adnrhd*Rettve and do not testing of certain Alternate Shutdown Attorney for licensee:(add 1.Bacon, involve a cheege In the weer m which the System equipment.This section Esq.,Consenter%Power Company,212 pleat I.operand specifically identifies the Alternate West Michigan Avenue.Jackson. In addln0a the proposed license Shutdown System components subject Michigan 49a1, amendment fits example(I)of the types to the surveillance requirements. NRC Project Director,Theodore R. of amendments that are considered not The amendment request also Quay.Acting. likely to involve significant hazards proposed other changes not described considerdt at published In the Federal above.Those proposed changes will be Consumes Power Company.Docket No. Register oats ige9(s1 FR 7751). discussed in a separate notice in the 50.255,Palisades Plant Van Buren in that it la eoaaldered to be a purely Federal when the Commission Cotmty. administtettve >�8� ranges to the T5;i.e.,a considers Issuance of those-changes. Dote of amendment recent March 10, change to achieve consistency Basis for proposed no significant 1987 throughout the TS.correct an error,or a hazards consideration determination: Description of amendment request change in nomenclature. The Commission has made a proposed The proposed amendment would change Based on the above review.the staff determination that the amendment the Technical Specifications to provide proposes to determine that the licensee's a Federal Register / Vol. 34. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 1988 / Notices 25827 request does not involve a significant modify plant design or operation and involve a significant reduction in a hazards consideration. The reducedtherefore °tes no new caps time test does nodnot margin of safety. Local Public Document Room Create reduced possibility The licensee has evaluated the location:Van Zoeren Library,Hope kind of accident since the remaining eat proposed change against the above College.Holland.Michigan 49423. functional test requfremanta ensure that any standards as required by 10 CFR 50.92. Attorney for licensee:Judd I.Bacon. credible failure of the circuitry no longer The licensee concluded that Esq..Consumers Power Company.212 response time tested is detected in a timely (1)The proposed change to delete the mass West Michigan Avenue,Jackson. manner flow rate and associated"from Items 3.a.1 Michigan 49201. •(3)Involves significant reduction to a and 4.4.1 of Table 3.32-2 don not involve a NRC Project Director Theodore R. margin of safety.As dimmed in(1)above. significant mcrease In the probability or Quay.Acting. the change acts to increase overall reliability consequences of an accident previously Detroit Edison of the HPCI system.As such the change acts evaluated.The mass flow rate value is not Company.Docket No.50- to increase the margin of safety.The margin produced by the installed in°tntmentatlon 342.Fermi-2,Monroe County,Michigan of safety te maintained since the WC system and it is not necessary nor required for the Date of amendment request:October is still conservatively response time tested Trip Setpoint to perform the function of 7.1986 and the circuitry which is no longer response Isolation of the RCIC or HPCI system.The time tested does not represent a credible mass flow rate value was used in the design Description of amendment request mechanism for degradation of the IIPCI calculations of steam flow across the steam The proposed change deletes the system response time line orifice and was used in developing the requirement to perform response time The staff has reviewed the licensee's differential pressure setpoints and allowable testing of the High Drywell Pressure evaluation and concurs with it On the values.The high dp Trip Serpoiot S not actuation of the High Pressure Coolant basis of the above consideration,the affected by the deletion of the mass flow rate Injection(HPCI)System.The change staff proposes to find that the changes value and".nor is it changed by the will eliminate unnecessary operation of do not involve a significant hazards proposed amendment Therefore.the change the HP°system and thus enhance consideration. will result in no change to the assumptions or overall HPCI system reliability. Local Public Document Ramscenarios used to evaluate the probability or Bolds for proposed no significant location:Monroe County Library consequences of evaluated accidents. hazards consideration determination: System.3700 South Custer Road. (2)w The proposed change to f delete m the mass ei The Commission has provided Monroe,Michigan 48181, and an rate of Table 3.3.24ciated does n Items a th standards for determining whether a Attorney licensee:John Flynn. l of Table or different not createthe f YM• possibility of a new Or kind of significant hazards consideration exists Esq..Detroit Edison Company.2000 accident from any accident previously [10 CFR 50.92(c))for a proposed Second Avenue.Detroit.Michigan 48220. evaluated.The proposed change does not amendment to a facility operating NRC Project Director.Theodore R. affect system operation,nor does it change license.A proposed amendment to an Quay,Acting. the Trip Setpolnts or Allowable Values based operating license lot a facility involves on dp and no safety-related equipment is nooperating significant hazards consideration i¢ Detroit Edison Company,Docket No.39• altered.The mass flow rate value is not operation on of the facility y in accordance ni 341,Fermi-2,Monroe County,Michigan required to prevent any accident Trip Set Data of amendments Points and Allowable Values,based on dp. with the proposed amendment would request are retained"as te"for the two Item& not 1 Involve a significant increase in November 14.1968 ( ) Description of amendments (3)The proposeds change to delete the mass the probability or consequences of an request flow rate and associated"from rams aa.2 accident previously evaluated:or(2) The proposed amendment would delete and 4.a.1 of Table 3.3.2.2 does not involve a Create the possibility of a new or the mass flow rate values associated significant reduction In a margin of safety. • different kind of accident from any with Steam Line Flow-High Trip The Trip signal generated by a high dp is not accident previously evaluated:or(3) Function of both the Reactor Core affected by ya this Whangelation sand therefore nction remains the involve a significant reduction in a Isolation Cooling(RCIC)system same.Therefore,the removal of the mass margin of safety. isolation and High Pressure Coolant flow rate numbers and associated"does not The licensee has evaluated the Injection(HPC1)system isolation as proposed change against the above listed in Table 3.3.2.1 items 3.a.2 and reduce any margin of salary. standards as required by 10 CPR 50.02 4.2.1.respectively.The change also The staff has reviewed the licensee's The licensee concluded that: finalizes the Trip Set Point and evaluation and concurs with it On the (1)The change does not involve a Allowable Values for these tip basis of the above consideration,the significant increase in the probability or functions staff proposes to find that the changes consequences of an accident previously Basis for proposed no significant do not involve a significant hazards evaluated The Penni-2 ECCS analysis takes hazards consideration determination: consideration no credit for the High Drywell Pressure The Commission has provided Local Public Document Room actuation of the*00 system and the High standards for determining whether a location:Monroe County library Drywell Pressure signal has been found to precede the Low Reactor Water Level signal sigrrificsnt hazards consideration existsSystem,3700 South Custer Road for all break sues,Thus.the time response (10 CPR 50.92(c))for a proposed Monroe.Michigan 46161. capability of the HPCI system can be amendment to a facility operating Attorney for licensee:john Flynn. conservatively verified by testing the system license.A proposed amendment to an Esq.,Detroit Edison Company.2000 time response to only the Low Reactor Water operating license for a facility involves Second Avenue.Detroit.Michigan 48226. Level actuation signal.The change reduces no significant hazards consideration if NRC Project Director.Theodore It the number of LOCI system starts required operation of the facility in accordance Quay.Acting. for surveillance testing and thus increases the with the proposed amendment would overall rehabtty of the HPCI system.This not:(1)involve a significant increase in Doke Power Company,et el"Decker increased probability or wtyacts to decease the the probability or consequences of an Nos. end 50414.Catawba evaluate consequences accide of previously accident previously evaluated:or(2) Nuclear Station.Units 2 and 2,York (2)Create the possibility of a new or create the possibility of a new or County.South Carolina different kind of accident from any accident different kind of accident from any Dote of amendment request April 8. previously evaluated.The change does not accident previously evaluated:or(3) 1989 ... ISOM Federal Register / Vol 54, No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19, 1999 / tttu'ra Description of amendment request The proposed revision world not(2) new or dlaarent kind of accident 5® • The proposed revision would allow the create the possibility as new ar any accident previasly seeleMed:or(3) conduct of a demonstration program. different kind of accident fray nay involve a sipiecsst redaction in a regarding tnterface compatibility accident previously evaluated because margin of safety, between three rod control cluster the demonehatlon RCCAs would The ptcpased chap dos not Evolve assemblies(RCCAs)supplied by function similarly to those designed by a significant basalt assideratke Babcock and Wilcox Fuel Company Westinghouse,and no new modes of became: (BWFC)and Westinghouse fuel operation are introduced. (1)The basis of the reactor trip system assemblies at Catawba Unit 2.11 would Finally,the proposed revision would and EFS actuation system alp setting* also allow the comparison of the wear not(3)mvatw a Maass reelection in are tie)bits In the safety analyses.The _ characteristics of various RCCA clad a margin of safety beans the BWFC proposed changes to the trip settings materials.This demonstration program RCCAJ should petces in accordance and allowable values ensure that these would Involve changing the description with Catawba TS limits before Unit 2 safety analysis limits are maintained of the Control Rod Assemblies in would commence Its operation following when the appropriate allowances for ' Section 5.32 of the Technical the current refueling outage. inetrtmrent channel inaccuracies,as Specifications(TS)for Catawba Unit 2 Accordingly,the Commission revised,are considered.Therefore,the only Unit l is included because the TSs proposes to determine that the proposed changes do not involve a for both units are combined in one amendments do not involve a significant significant increase in the probability or document, hazards consideration, consequences of an accident previously Two of the demonstration assemblies Local Public Document Room evaluated, consiAcmest od control rods fabricated with locator York County Library,138 East (2)The proposed amendment would y plated 304 stainless steed Black Street Rock Hill.South Carolina not cause any changes in plant cladding.The tided assembly consists of 29730 equipment or design.Therefore,it does control rods fabtinated with chromium Attorney for licensee:Mr.Albert Carr, not create the probability of an accident carbide coated inconel e25 cladding.In- Duke Power Company.422 South reactor experience with the chromium Church Street.Charlotte,North Carolina pr a malfunction evaluated.0 different from ones carbide coating has shown that the 28242 s he coating performs extremely well. NRC Project Director:David B. (3)These changes will not affect the The three RCCAa supplied by BWFC Matthews assumptions or consequences of any maintain the same design features as the safety analysis presented i the FSAR. Duquesne Westinghouse 17x17 RCCAa.All of the ht 50.334,Beaver Valley Power No. involve f�• amendment ion not on*iterydimeer aces have a been"rated by Unit No.1. Pennsylvania �o significant reduction in a puh9ppirtgpoR,Penns Ivania ma ty, inspections made at Metuire Units 1 Date of amendment request:March 2. Acrd°Y•the staff proposes to and 2.In addition.a dummy RCCA was 1999 determine that this amendment does not fabricated and shipped to Catawba Unit rive ipbon of olnettdmerrr request: involve a t on, cent hazards 2 for interface end handtbtg checkout. The proposal amendment would revise consideration, The licensees submittal provides a the reactor trip system and engineered Local Public Document Room summary of the design Information and safety feature(FSF)actuation system location:B.F,Jones Memorial Library, these!hydraulic compatibility analysis instrumentation trip setpoints and 883 Frenklia Avenue.Aliquippa. for the demonstration RCCAS. allowable values.based son the results Pennsylvania 15001. Bosh forpevposed ao significant of a re-analysis of the iatr ument Attorney for licenser Gerald hazards Consideration determination: channel inaccuracies.All the changes Charnot,Esquire,Jay E.Saberg, The Comminien has provided are located in Tables 22-1 and 3.3-4 of Esquire.Shaw.lettman.Potts& standards for determining whether a the Technical cpacciScatlms.The Trowbridge,2300 N Street NW.. sig ificant hazards consideration exists licensee submitted Westinghouse report Washington,DC 20037. (10 CFR 50.92(c)).A proposed WCAP-11419."Westinghouse Setpuiar NRC Project Director.John F.Stolz amendment to an operating license for a Methodology for Protection Systems. Cult States UMW Company.locket faconsideration cilves no significant hazards Beaver Valley Unit 1."to support this No,80.458,River Bend Station Unit 1 nsoo ance of the facility amendment request.The changes are West Felidss Pais.Laminas iamendment would not:proposed needed a actuation etpp the after r trip and ESP' Dote o amendment ( ) setpoints, factoring m the. 1989 f request March 21. significant increase in the probability or revisedailowaaca ofinaccuracy. consequences of an accident previously within limits assumed in the Final Description of request evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of Safety Analysis Report, The proposed amendment would - a new or different kind of accident from Basis for prvposed no ugruficant relocate the requirements for the any accident previously evaluated or(3) hazards consideration determ/ratr'me.• examination and tesrlsg of snubbers. involve a significant reduction in a The Commission bee provided The licensee's proposal would substitute margin of safety. standards far determining whether a Technical Specification(I'S)4.0.5 and The proposed rev*ion would not(1) significant bath caadderatiort exists the NRC approved Revision 2 to the involve a significant increase in the (10 CFR 30.94c)).A proposed River Bald Station Service Inspection probability or consequences of an amendment to an operating license for a (ISI)program for the current TS 3/47,4, - accident previously evaluated because facility involves no significant hazards "SS's".TS 404 states.to part the change in the shutdown margin for consideration if operation of the facility in4.05 s low malianep .end test A.Sla the three dtaeukration RCCAs is in accordance with the proposed code Class I.2.&3 negligible,and measurements would be amendment would not(1)involve a °°°°b shall be performed during eachapplicable o follows: Cycle initial significant increase la the probability or e.IDearvfoe impaction dA$la Code startup to verify the acceptability of the consequences of an accident previously liar 1.2.and 3 onapseets end Service rod worths, evaluated;(2)create the possibility of a testing of nee C.ede Clam 1.2 and 3 pcm,ps nasal legit I Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 2%P / Notes 2IM6 and valves shall W peeform°d ta accordance B.The proposed change will titled' Tire staff hes reviewed the Beeneee e with Ssctien XI of the ASME Boller and snubber load capacity a•an additional n0 significant hazards consideration Pressure Vessel Code and apphable criierion feu maple lips celestine.Snubber determination.Bend on the review and Addenda as required by 10 CFR SO.Section sample selection bawd on load capecity as a the above dke:esston.the staff propuaed 50,5Se(gt except where specl0c written relief criterion provides•an complete toss hes been premed by the Commission section of pleat t0 determine that the a snubber population.and proposed changes pursuant to 10 CPR SO,Section 5O.s5e(gi(el(i). therefore.ellen for more accurate test do not brvolve a significant homed" Snubber inspection requirements are results and fathom mode entwines Sinai consideration. inchtded in Article IWP,Section 11 of only accessiklbty determinant*scope of Local Public Document Ream the ASME Code and Revision 2 of the subsegeent visual lntNecttoe.this eddieloesel Locorion;Conrnment Documents River Bend'Station(ABS)IS1 program. criterion Mil ha.emimpact on the°cope of Department Louisiana State University. Thus,TS 4.0.5 and the ISI program subsequent sarvectioci .Baton Rogge,Louisiana 70003 would define the enubber requirements. C.The pap s epchama Attorney for licensee: 8.Conner, Because of the proposed relocation of The purposed change l leo snubber blaywomanr YTroy during ex°mltuntiasdlnsawsibisesbb°r )r..Eaq.,Conner and Wetterhahal7fJ the snubber examination and testing reactor shutdown follows the guidelines for Pennsylvania Avenue.NW., requirement&the licensee's proposal successive inspections as specified is ASME Washington,DC 2000n would delete TS 3147.4.Figure 47,4.1. Section XL the NRC approved Revbten 2 to NRC Project Director.Jose A.Calvo "Sample flan for Snubber Functional the ROSISI Pis and Rensian 2 be the Test".and Oases Section 3/4.7.4. Standard Technical Specifications Mower* Illinois Power Company,goyland Power Basis at a gij' these examinantstebe delayed until the • j p; paned oo ei i inane next reactor shutdown of a°tbclent dtsstian Cooperative, titan St Denims No.o.1. . hazanie consideration determination: Denton Porno Station.Udt NO.1. will en subsllowtantiallyedavwill decrease ms-rcn county.men standards for determining whether a exposures as■result of these otaminetions. Date of amendment request , significant hazards consideration exists Since these proposed changes Jo not remit December ye,mg as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed in a change to plant dense ce operettas Description of amendment request amendment to en operating license fora modes and do not result in a!edentate in the The proposed amendment would revise facility involves no significant hazards scope of required snubber examinations TechnicalSpecifications 3.6.2.7 to delete consideration if operation of the facility there Is se significant ma,...In the in accordance with the proposed probability or coeaquence°of any accident a limitation on the period of approval for amendment would not:(1)involve a previously evaluated. drywell purge and vent system 2.significant increase h1 the probability ee p �or different kind of ange will!tot agate the footnote which specific limitationtthe is e possibilitysyst m wLids tsap applicable l allowed consequences of an accident psevi0asly accident than any previously evaluated cyst®operation ta appBeabla for the evaluate*or(2)ante the possibility of because. period from initial foal lead to 3 months a new or different kind of accident from This proposal entails the twain of any accident previously evaluate*or(3) responsibility for snubber inaltectnoo.to after completion of the first refueling involve a significant reduction in a comparable programa,both of which comply outage.The submittal states that this limitation should have only been margin of safety.The licensee provided with the minimum requirements d ASt� an analysis that addressed the above Section XL The qustirative end qualitative included for the operation of the three standards in the amendment scope of se"e ar ewminadons'meant been containment purge system and was three tared reduced below the minimum requitement*of inappropriately included for the drywall appliI.No tionicaat increase in the probability ASME Section x1 Since the proposed change purge and vent system. does not molt in•cbenge to the plant deeds consequences of an accident previously or operating sods a reduce the scope al Both foe proposed no munificent evaluated results from the proposed change subsequent examl•stfota,the proposed hazards consideration drterminetim: because, change cannot iotmdaa the possibility of• The staff has evaluated this proposed The proposed change does not result fe a new or different kind of accident than amendment end determined that it change to the plant design or inspection and previously evaluated. involves no significant hazards - - testing, such the proposed not change the response of of the change doe°g,The reposed change does not involve a consideration.According to 10 the plant or equipment required for safety as described in significant reduction in the margin of safety 50.92(eJ,a proposed amendment to an Chapters a and 15 of the RB$Updated Safety because: operating license involves no significant Analysis Report.The NRC approved RBS IS1 The spores®to snubber end Mute hazard.consideration if operation of the Plan continues to exceed the minimum operate"proposed in Nis ammidmeae facility in accordance with the inspection requirements of ASME Section Xt request is more conservative them Net testa amendment would not: for snubbers,The scope of annul in the current Technical Speciftaittoes.Tas examination has not been redwood. added conservation waR act b increase,not (1)Involve a significant Massa in The requirements of the current Technical decrease,any suitesmargin of slaty. the probability or consequences,of an Specifications governing snubber inspecd ons Additionally,the proposed change does not accident previously evaluate*or . at MS ban beat incorporated into the NRC reduce the scope of subsequent (2)Create the possibility of a new or approved RBS 1St Plea with the thrifollowins examinsdons.Pettier,et beequent revisions different kind of endddsot from any . exceptions: to the RDS 151 Plan are required tribe 'aided previously evaluated;or A.Limiting Condition for Opaeatiro submitted for%RC review and approval riot A more conaewattve approach will be to Implementation.Therefore,the proposed (3)Involve•efgniEaei reder tivn is• utilized by tonside.Mg•system mopenble change will nor decrease the margin of safety. margin of safety. to which an operable snubber le eltacled. Based on the above constdewdan.the The proposed changes do not Involve without allowing fore 72 tour component proposed change doss not loase.a the a significant Saean In the probability eveluadac period prior to this determination. probability or the consequences of a or consequences of an accident This is in keeping with ASME Section Xi and previoualy evaluated accident does not previously evaluated beano the the current Tegbnkal Specification d&0radan create the possibility of a new at different proposed chimp would only allow or OPERASILftY.This change is intended to kind of accident from any previously conform the ABS Technical Specifications evaluated.end does not involve a redaction continued limited as of the et e•o with the NRC approved IDS 1SI Plan the in the margin of eery.Therein,Cuff grave purge and vent system Thera of the requirements al MICR Section la and the Utinds areaway reposes test no system foe presume ca•trol was current definition of OPF3tABELITY. significant hazards are involved, previously evaluated and approved by • Y I I I I. 15830 Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 1980 / Notices the NRC in Clinton's Supplemental (1)The proposed amendment does not capacity.The proposed amendment Safety Evaluation Report 5. Involve a significant Increase in the would raise the battery cell minimum The proposed changes do not create probability or consequences of an accident voltage from 2.0 Volt to 2.13 Volt and the possibility of a new or different kind previously evaluated because deletion of the change the minimum corrected specific of accident from any accident previously organization charts from the Technical Specifications does not affect plant gravity from 1.190 to 1.195 for the pilot evaluated because the proposed change Operation.As in the put Na NRC w 11 cells and to specify a minimum of 1.200 introduces no changes to plant design or continue to be informed of organization specific gravity for the average of all operation of the facility, changes through other regained controls.In connected cells,This is associated with The proposed changes do not involve accordance with 10 CPR n0.st(b)(e)(q the replacing the present lead acid plate cell a significant reduction in a margin of applicant's organizational structure is with lead-calcium cells. safety because the changes do not alter required to be included in the Final Safety Also,this requires a battery service or the criteria for system operation.It only Analysis Report.Chapter 23 of the Final performance Safety Analysis Report provides•■ f discharge test once each allows the system operation to continueoperating cycle depending on battery description of the organization and detailed past the original limited period. organization chests.As required by 10 CFR condition,time interval since the Fur the reasons stated above.the staff movie),the Indians Michigan power previous performance discharge test, - believes this proposed amendment Company submits annual updates to the and age of the battery. involves no significant hazards FSAR Appendix 8 to 20 CFI!Part 50 end 10 Basis for proposed no significant consideration. CPR 50.6e(a)(3)govern changes to hazards consideration determination:In Local Public Document Room organization described in the Quality accordance with the requirements of 10 location:Veapasian Warner Public Assurance Program.Some of these CFR 50.92.the licensee submitted the Library,120 West Johnson Street atlmnal changes regtdte prior NRC following significant hazards evaluation: approv Clinton.Illinois 01727. approval,Also.it is Indiana Michigan Power Company's practice to Inform the NRC of 1.Does the proposed license Attorney for licensee:Sheldon Zabel, organizational changes affecting the nuclear amendment involve a significant Esq.,Schiff,Hardin and Waite,>200 facilities prior to implementation. Increase in the probability or Sears Tower,233 Wacker Drive, (2)The proposed amendment doe.not consequences of any accident Chicago.Illinois 60600 create the possibility of a new or different previously evaluated? • NRC Project Director. Daniel R kind of accident than previously evaluated Evaluation: Muller because the proposed change is 1.The proposed amendment will replace administrative In nature,and no physical the exiting 250 Volt DC batteries with higher Indiana Michigan Powor Company. alterations of plant configuration or changes capacity bed-calcium calla that require a Dockets Nos 60415 and 30.318,Donald to set points or operating parameters are • C.Cook Nuclear Plant,Units Nos.1 and DroPosed higher floating voltage and different specific 2,Berrien County,Michigan (3)The proposed amendment does not in e d values, e andca operation iry to carry fh 250 5t the involve a significant reduction to a margin of intended function unaffet of the Date of amendments request: safety because Indiana Michigan Power Volt DC System will be unaffected and the September 6,1908 Company,through Its Quality Assurance system will continue to satisfy its safety Description of amendments request' Programs,its commitment to maintain design bases as stated in the Updated Safety The amendment would delete Figure 8,2- qualified personnel la positions of Analysis Report With the proposed minimum 1,"Organizational Relationships Within responsibility.and other required controls. cell batteryvoge have a ed specific gnvitlee. assures the safety functions will be adequate capacity to the American Electric Power System performed at a high level of competence, supply the required emergency loads Pertaining to QA a QC and Support of Therefore,removal of the organizational following a design basis accident.The system the Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant"and chart from the Technical Specifications will performance will he Improved e■the existing Figure 6.2.2."Facility Organization- not affect the margin of safety. batteries are nearing the end of their design Donald C.Cook-Unit No.1"and",.• Accordingly,the Contest= life.The proposed amendment will not Unit No.2",from the Technical proposes to determine that this change involve a algniilcant increase in the Specifications in response to Generic does not involve a significant hazards probability or consequences of any accident uated. Letter 88-00, consideration 2.previously Theeve present requirement Basis forproposed no significant The ry to a pert r is to subject the � LocolPubllc Document Room 250 VDC battery to a performance discharge hazards consideration determination: location:Maude Preston Palenske test once every operating cycle.The proposed The Commission has provided Memorial Library,300 Market Street.St. amendment will change the surveillance standards in 10 CFR 50.92(c)for Joseph,Michigan 49083. tasting on the 250 Volt battery to require a determining whether a significant Attorney for licensee:Gerald battery service or■performance discharge hazards consideration exists,A Charaoff:Eaq.,Shaw,Pittman.Potts and test once every operating cycle depending on • proposed amendment to an operating Trowbridge.2300 N Street,NW.. battery condition,time interval since the license for a facility involves no Washington.DC 20037. previous performance discharge test and age significant hazards consideration,if MC Project Dlnrctor.Theodore R of the battery.The new requirements are operation of the facility in accordance Creep consistent card d Technicalicry Working with the proposed amendment would Quay,Acting. Crecy draft s fo bun !Ions not 1 Involve a significant increase in Nebraska Publk Poutar -Docket ties. rid for W Wthe NR at BWR ( ) faciities accepted Additionally.the NRC has the probability or consequences of an No.slat Cooper Nuclear Station, previously these surveillance accident previously evaluated or(2) Nemahs County,Nebraska requirements for the 123 VDC batteries with Create the possibility of a new or Dote of amendment request:January the issuance of Amendment No.122 to the different kind of accident from any 27,19° CNS license.and the 250'DC battery cells accident previously evaluated;or{3) Description of amendment Argues:: are identical to those supplied for that= Involve a sigrlficant reduction Ina The existing 250 Volt batteries at VDC batteries.These assure the battery ace margin of safety.The Indiana Michigan Cooper Nuclear Station are be isadegmenG coup t ee ie 250 Volt Power Company reviewed the proposed replaced during the 1969 refueling is loads adequate the timeo supply the period following volt change and determined..and the NRC outage by new lead-calcium batteries design basisloads is the time The proposed staffthe staff concurs,that that have a greater ampere-hour amendment will not involves significant ee Fedsal Rapids / Vol. St4 No. 74 / Wednesday. April It IMP /. Pence 75531 brans la the ptohsbS ly srcoasegaaaaa involve•afptfamt ardente Is dm The opmeleit of?ItslePad Dalt1.It of any accident ptaviauly eval.Ned, required mart.of safety.The NitC staff analatkaawiik tkallnea dearadmit. L Does the proposed license has reviewed the licensee's no will red wear Ikepraib*7 eta are re amendment create the pos bility of a Manion hazards considerations different kind of scalded nem aay accideas new or different kind of accident from determination and saves with the previouaty.vakstad. any accident previously evaluated? licensees analysis.The sui f has. This change corrects as error so that the Evaluation: therefore.made• Technical Specifications conform to the the mttaimmn proposed wiiagesaand t will tp«change determination that the u licensee's request ceseetetual meneet� swam Sinot effthected try gravities to reflect the replacement of the does not Involve a significant haterds this chars°.A.such Sr themes is existing 250 Volt batteries web new bed- consideration. adNaleb.eve b Dense sad does not mate calcium calla The operstbo and function of Loral Public Document Room the pebsbWtyof a aft dtffawa,Nada the 230 Volt DC Sy.tem will be unaffected location:Auburn Public Library.116 accident from any anident pawosety and remain as described in the CNS USAir 15th Street Aubem.Nebraska 68306, evaluated.A table similar so 3.34 is the The proposed amendment will not aeate the Attorney for licensee:Mr.G.D. PSAR hse previaisly bean renested. potability of a aew ordifferent kind of Watson.Nebraska Public Power The%eratbn of Nine MA Point Uait L u accident from any pvvviutrhv evaleeted. District.Post Office Box 499.Columbus. accordance with the proposed amendment. 2.The proposed amendment would revise Nebraska 66601. will not involve a significant reductiun in a the ionveLLbnce tasting for the 230 Volt NRC Project Director.Jose A.Calvo margin The d ant station battens.win&would better manespray system operation is the operability of this system however,this Nurses 1Nokawk power Corporetioa not effected by dal cheers Any one of the proposed amendment will not change the Docket Na a-a Nine Mile Point lour canalise*spray bops(with it.raw operedoa or function of tha 250 Volt DC water pump)b capable at saintalaing the System.e.described in the USAir The Nuclear Staffers.Usk N. 1.Oe.ego containment temperature and Dreams within proposed amendment will not snow arty new County.New York the design bale.Automatic mstaratieo of a mode of plant operation or create the Date of amendment request:March lb, loop is tke Met=deism'naeesary to possibility of■new or different kind of 1988 maintain existing safety margin This change accident from nay accident previasty Description of amendment request does not involve any significant reduction an evaluated. The proposed amendment would revise margi°otasfeq'' 3.Does the proposed amendment The operation of Nine hCa Point Unit 1.in the Technicala) lecifica"Prone imary accordance involve a significant reduction in the an error in Table 3.34 accordance with the proposed amendment margin of safety? Lines will not involve a significant increase b the Evaluation: Containment feotatttm Valve probability or consequences or en accident 1,The new 250 Volt batteries will have Entering Flee Space of the previously evaluated, greater ampere-hour capacity to safeguard Containment."The change will clarify This change does not affect the capability the station in the event of a design beds that the containment spray Isolation of the containment spray system to most its accident until off rite AC power sources are valves do not receive automatic deetgn basis.Since die origins?system design restored.The proposed amendment doe,not initiation signals to open on reactor low-, heals it met the probability or consequences involve s significant seduction hi the margin low water level end high thyself of an accident previously evaluated ate not of safeeh 2.The Proposed amendment will revise the pressure.g The affected at valves are by Basedd on the above,the staff proposes during plant operation as required surveillance testing will the 250 Volt sty of station operating proeerhrree and to determine that the amendment will batteries and will not affect the ability of the receive no automatic closure signals not involve a significant hazards 230 Volt DC System to perform its intended function during normal or accident including the signal for containment consideration. conditions The proposed a'mlmsnt does isolation.The slaver may be cloned Local Public Document Room not involve a signl icaat reduction in the during system teethe,removal of water iotajfiora Reference and Documents margin of safety, from the suppression pool,maintenance Department Pen$etd Library.State B.Additional basis for proposed no or suppression pool cooing The Phial Umvedty Of New York.Oewega New significant hazards considerate* Safety Analysts Report wee previously York 13126. determination: revised to make this change.The Aternyfariiesessc Troy B.Cornet, The Commission ha provided guidance proposed amendment cards the Jr.,Esquire Corner a Weti rbehn Suite concerning the application of the atandarda Technical Speai$0atiom accordingly 1030.1747 Pennsylvania Avenue,NW.. for detsideratiotng whether rsignificantvion hazales Bair for proposed no slgnifican Washington DC 20008. consideration It i by chadingnge ge le examples(4s.FR 14670).The ofrnege it hazards eonslabmtlan determination- NRC Project Director.Robert A. considered to fit the mrspfet"fix)A met The Commission has provided Capri; or replacement of•maim component a standards for determining whether a Northeast Nuclear Faagy Comparv.et system important bse4y.Y the follow* significant hazards consideration white al..Dock"Na$50523.MAteteoe NucW[ condition.are met(I)The repair or as stated in 10 G 'R 50.9.A proposed Power Station.unit Na 3.New London replacement prone..involves practice which amendment to an opeceeng)tamet for e have been,uccesskdly implemented....and County.Connection (21 The repaired or replacement component fodtftryy involves no stgdfleaat hazards or system does not result Ina significant co dons If operation of the facility �of amwidraent request March Inv change in its safety fired=..."It is the in accordance with a proposed 1989 Mina's belief that thitcharm.request?alb amendment would not(I)Involve a Description of omens rent request within the guidance mended significant Increase in the probability or The proposed change to Paregtaph I A Based on the previous discussion.the coesequarces of an accident prevfoady of Facility Operating License NPF-at licensee do landed that the proposed emanate*or(2)create the possibility of would delete the retenate to the City of amendment request don not involve* anew or different kind of accident from Burlington as a*of the licensees for significant beaten in the probability or any accident pre ioerly evaluated;at(3) Millstone Unit 3. consequences of an accident prevfoualy involve a significant reduction in a Dasis for proposer no significant eve bedeck nor ovate the possibility of a margin of safety. hoesMsctnniderationd rterrainoriorr new or different kind of incident from In it.Mach a.1964suhni its),the By letter dated February IS.2989 the any accident previooaty evaluated;rem licensee provided the following analysts: NRC staff was informed of a transfer of 15832 Federal Attester / VOL 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April i9. 1969 / Notices a minor percentage ownership share licensee)submitted the Millstone Unit 3 With regard to the proposed between two of the existing licensees of Turbine Overspeed Protection inoperability of the Turbine Overspeed Millstone Unit No.3 effective as of Maintenance and Test Program Protection System during Modes 2 and 3 ' February 15,1969.Specifically,the (TOPMPp).The TOPMTP encompasses the probability of turbine failure would • change involves the transfer of the the surveillance requirements of Section not increase since the turbine cannot be 0.0435 percent joint ownership interest 4.3.4.2.In addition.the TOPMPT operated under the proposed of the City of Burlington,Vermont to the provides for other turbine overspeed restrictions. Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy system related tests and for high and 2.Create the possibility of a new or Cooperative(CMEEC).Both the City of low pressure turbine rotor inspections. different kind of accident from any Burlington and the CMEEC have been thereby assuring an acceptably low previously analyzed.Since there are no associate participants in Millstone Unit probability of a rotor burst at or near changes in the way the plant is No.9 as provided in the Sharing design overspeed.Avoiding destructive operated.the potential for an Agreement dated September 1.1973. overspeed and rotor failures is essential unanalyzed accident is not created.No The staff has made a determination in to minimizing the probability of the new failure modes are introduced. accordance with 10 CFR 50.92 that this generation of turbine missiles which 3.Involve a significant reduction in a by application for amendment is enveloped could impact and damage safety-related margin of safety.The proposed b example 0.110,51 FR components,structures.and equipment replacement of the Section 3/4.3.42 3e a change to a license to reflect a The more comprehensive TOPMPT turbine overspeed protection minor adjustment in ownership among provides the necessary assurance that surveillance requirements with a newly co-owners,and,as such,does not the probability of turbine generated developed comprehensive maintenance involve a significant hazards missiles will remain at or below the and testing consideration. criteria of 1 x 10'°peryear inprogram impacts.does not introduce Local Public Document Room any adverse Since the proposed location:Waterford Public Library,49 accordance with urbiStanner!Review Plan changes q also do not cci the nt Rope Ferry Road,Waterford Section 3.5.1.3.change to Se M1.8() "The consequences lofy any accident Connecticut 08385. proposed is a ive and technical wonk previously n the mar inth of 1s e Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield. oversight,by vide for administrative the reductionnin the margin of safety. Esquire.Day.Berry&Howard,One TOPMPT der n staff thathas made a Constitution Plaza.Hartford proposed determination the Connecticut 06103-3499 With regard to the proposed footnote application for amendment involves no NRC Project Director John F.Stolz to TS 3.3.4,the provision would allow significant hazards consideration. the inoperability of the Turbine Local Public Document Room Northeast Nuclear Energy Company,et Overspeed Protection System,during location:Waterford Public Library,49 aL,Docket No.50423,Millstone Nuclear operational Modes 2 and 3(hot standby Rope Ferry Road.Waterford. Power Station.Unit No.3,New London and low power generation)only under Connecticut 06383. County,Connecticut specified conditions which prevent the Attorney for licensee:Gerald Garfield Dote of amendment regreat March 14, turbine,itself,from operating. Esquire,Day,Berry&Howard.One 1989 Title 10 CFR Part 50,Section 50.92 Constitution Plaza,Hartford. Description of amendment request contains standards for determining Connecticut 081033499. The proposed amendment would change whether a proposed license amendment NRC Project Director.John F.Stolz the Millstone Unit 3 Technical involves significant hazards Northern States Power Company,Specifications(TS)to replace the considerations.In this regard.the Docket No. o 50263 Monticello NuclearSurveillance Requirements of TS 4.3.4, proposed changes to the TS does not: Generating Plant,Wright County. "Turbine Overspeed Protection,"as 1.Involve a significant increase in the Mtnnesots follows:(1)TS 4.3.4.2 would be deleted probability or consequences of an and replaced with a reference to the accident previously analyzed.The Date of amendment request March 7, requirements of the'Turbine Overspeed TOPMPT encompasses all of the 1989 Protection Maintenance and Testing surveillance requirements of Section Description of amendment request Program,"and(2)TS 6.5.1.8. 4.342 and also provides for additional The proposed license amendment would "Responsibilities,"would be turbine overspeed protection system revise the existing Technical supplemented by adding item(j)which related tests and high and low pressure Specification to permit the use of up to would require that the Plant Operations turbine rotor inspections.Since the two alternates in meeting the quorum Review Committee(PORC)provide for intent of this change Is to ensure the requirements for the plant Operations "Review of Unit Turbine Overspeed reliability of the overall Turbine Committee.The plant Operations Protection Maintenance and Testing Overspeed Protection System.(i.e., Committee consists of at least six Program and revisions thereto."In channel calibration and testing of members drawn from the key addition.a footnote would be added to related components),there is no adverse supervisors of the On-Site Supervisory the applicability for TS 3.3.4 to state that impact on any design basin accident. Staff whose responsibilities include the the Turbine Overspeed Protection This program would also provide the review of(1)modifications to plant System need not be operable,"...In necessary assurance that the probability systems or components described in the MODE 2 or 3 with all main steam line of turbine generated missiles will remain Updated Safety Analysis Report.(2) isolation valves and associated bypass at or below the NRC criteria.eliminating changes to normal and emergency valves in the closed position and all the need for considering turbine missiles operating procedures(3)proposed other steam flow paths to the turbine in design basis analysis.In addition,the Technical Specification changes,and(4) isolated." proposed change to TS 0.5.1.6(f), the results of Technical Specification Basis for proposed no significant requiring PORC oversight of the violation investigations. hazards consideration determination: TOPMPT provides reasonable Basis for proposed no significant By letter dated November 7.1988, assurance that changes to the TOPMPT hazards consideration determination: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company(the will not adversely affect the program. The Commission has provided Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1989 / Notices 159913 standards for determining whether a reactor trip system using shunt coil trip proposed changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration exists attachments.In its evaluation the staff significant hazards consideration.The (10 CFR$0.92(c)),and has also published concluded that independent testing of licensee's evaluation is as follows: certain examples for making such the undervoltage and shunt trip a.Does the change involve a significant determinations(51 FR 7751).One of the attachments during power operation and increase in the probability or consequences examples published is"(i)A purely independent testing of the control room of an accident previously evaluated? administrative change to the technical manual switch contacts during each Addition of the operability and specifications:for example,a change to refueling outage are necessary to insure surveillance requirements for the achieve consistency throughout the reliable trip breaker operation. Undervoltage Trip and Shunt Trip technical specifications,correction of an Specifically,the following TS changes Attachments constitute a set of requirements error,or a change in nomenclature." are proposed: more restrictive than presently included In The licensee has evaluated the 1.Action Statement 12 would be the technical specifications and will result in proposed Technical Specification added to TS Table 3.3.1 to provide fora an increase in the reliability of the reactor changes against the standards and 48 hour allowed outage time after one of trip breaker and the rector trip system. examples provided by the Commission the diverse reactor trip features 'therefore.the proposed amendment to add and has concluded that the changes are (Undervoltage or Shunt Trip operability and surveillance requirements for purely administrative.The Attachment)has been declared the Undervoltage Trip and Shunt Trip Commission's staff has reviewed the inoperable in either Mode 1 or 2.If the Attachments does not Involve a significant licensee's evaluation and agrees that the inoperable trip feature is not restored to tameaw in the probability of an accident changes are administrative in nature. operable status within 48 hours,Action previously evaluated. The changes will upgrade the existing Statement 10 would apply. b•Does the change create the possibility of Technical Specifications to make them 2.Table Notation 15 of TSTable 4.3-1 a new or different kind of accident from any consistent with the Standard Technical would be added to require that the trip accident previously evaluated? Specifications developed for General actuating device operational test on the Testing of the Undervoltage Trip and Shunt Electric boiling water reactors which(1) Manual Reactor Trip independently Dip Attachments will not result In any new allows the use of alternates for regular verify the operability of the or previously unevaluated plant Operations Committee members in Undervoltage Trip and Shunt Trip configurations Therefore,the proposed meeting committee quorum circuits. amendment does cot create the possibility of requirements.thereby,reducing the 3.Notation 11 of TS Table 4.3-1 would a new or different kind of accident from any heavy time demands placed on be revised to indicate that each trip accident previously evaluated. Operations Committee regular members. actuating device operational test of the °'Does inth the change involve a significant and(2)provides for a reasonable degree reactor trip breakers shall separately reduction m margin ofityfand of flexibility in the day-to-day business verify the operability of the survAddition of the operability for y are of plant operational activities which will Undervoltage Trip and Shunt Trip Uod once Trip a Shunt the P at A ac help and Trip not compromise safety. Ataehments. Attachments ensure the functioning of Local Public Document Room 4.The Reactor Trip Bypass Breaker the reactor trip system when needed and will location:Minneapolis Public Library. would be added to TS Table 4.3.1 result in an increase in the reliability of the Technology and Science Department, including the associated Notation 18, reactor trip breaker and the reactor trip 300 Nicollet Mall•Minneapolis, which requires a local manual shunt trip . system.Therefore.the proposed amendment Minnesota 55401. test prior to placing the breaker in does not involve a significant reduction in a Attorney for licensee:Gerald service,and Notation 17.which requires margin of safety. Charnoff.Esq.,Shaw,Pittman.Potts and testing of the automatic undervoltage The NRC staff has reviewed the Trowbridge,2300 N Street,NW., trip. licensee's no significant hazards Washington.DC 20037. Basis for proposed no significant consideration determination.The staff NRC Project Director:Theodore R. hazards consideration determination: has concluded that the proposed TS Quay,Acting. The Commission has provided changes constitute additional Pacific Gas and Electric Company, standards for determining whether a no ... restrictions on plant operation that will Docket Nos 50-275 and 80423.Diablo significant hazards consideration ex1eas stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed result in increased with Canyon Power Plant,Unit Nos.1 and 2, amendment to an operating license for a Therefore,the staffPlant agrees lity. with the . San Luis Obispo County.California facility involves no significant hazards determination..Accorconclusion of the dingly. Dates of amendmenta the request: consideration if operation of the facility Commission proposes to determine that December 19.1988 and March 23.1999 in accordance with the proposed these changes do not involve s (Reference LAR 88-10). amendment would not(1)involve a significant hazards consideration. Description of amendment request: significant increase in the probability or Local Public hazards Room The proposed amendments would revise consequences of an accident previously location:California Document c Polytechnic State the combined Technical Specifications evaluated:or(2)create the possibility of (TS)for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant a new or different kind of accident from University Library.Government (DCPP)Unit Nos.1 and 2 to incorporate any accident previously evaluated:or(3) Documents and Maps Department.Sari the undervoltage trip and shunt trip involve a significant reduction in a Luis Obispo.California 93407. attachments testing recommended by margin of safety. Attorneys for licensee:Richard R. WCAP-11312,"Reactor Trip Breaker The licensee,in its submittal of Locke,Esq.,Pacific Gas and Electric Maintenance/Surveillance Optimization December 19,1988,evaluated the Company.P.O.Box 7442.San Francisco. Program,"for compliance with the proposed changes against the significant California 94120 and Bruce Norton.Esq., guidance provided by Generic Letter 85- hazards criteria of 10 CFR 50.92 and- c/o Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 09.These operability and testing against the Commission guidance P.O.Box 7442,San Francisco,California requirements are based on the NRC concerning application ofithis standard. 94120. staffs evaluation of the Westinghouse Based on the evaluation given below. NRCPm/ect Director.George W. generic design modifications for the the licensee has concluded that the Knighton I I 15194 Federal Itagiater / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1*sS / Notices Pennsylvania Power and Light Dossibtk of a new ca different kind of driver a they force the control reds tato Company.Docket Na war, aootdeat hum anyprav1oaaly evaluated). the core. Susquehanna Steam Electric State, W.The proposed change,do not involve• A saw system Udt 1.Luzern@ County.Pennsylvania sigultiou t reduction m *WYSince the centalri setisokadonand a margin of a m AAA scutlan ge ►rd sore Duce amendment years 24, ate request February integrity en assured to the same relevant ego to ensure the adequacy of this Description of amendment criteria as dseunsd previously,the overall system and a post.instefation teat was P request safety taw*has not bean siaugh:tidy performed at that there which proved the The proposed amendment would change radward dal to the tawaed chasm adequacy of the design.Since no the SSES.Unit 1 Technical Based on the above considerations. unexpected changes can be expected Specifications to permit residual heat the Commission proposes to determine which affect this design,repeated teats removal(RHR)system modification that the proposed changes involve no of the adequacy of the system by • which eliminates the steam condensing significant hazards consideration. manual scram are not necessary,Other mode of RHR operation.The licensee Local Public Document Boom 7S requirements(namely.Specifications had previously requested and the location:Osterhout Free Library, 4,3,A.2,b.4.3A2f,4.3.0,Table 4.1-1. Commission approved a similar request Reference Department.71 South and Table 4.1-2)adequately ensure the for SSES,Unit 2 in Amendment No.49, Franklin Street,Wilkes-Bane, continued operability of the scram dated May 24,1988. Pennsylvania 18701 discharge system.Therefore,no Basis for proposed no significant Attorney for licensee:Jay Silbers, decrease in testing which is designed to hazards consideration determination: Esquire.Shaw.Pittman.Potts and ensure the availability and operability The Commission has provided Trowbridge,2500N Street NW„ of the scram discharge system results standards for determining whether a Washington.DC 20087 from deleting the 50%rod density scram significant hazards consideration exists AWtRrjectDfrector Walter R. test requirement Also,the proposed (10 CFR 50.92(c)).A proposed Butler change is consistent with the testing amendment to an operating license for a power Authority of the State of New requirements of most BWR plants and facconsiderationility involves f no significant hazards York Docket No.50.333,lase A. with the Standard Technical operation of the facility FitzPatdck Nuclear Power Plant, Specifications in accordance with the proposed Oswego,New York The proposed administrative changes amendment would not(1)involve a Would(1)relocate Specification 3.3.A.Ze significant increase in the probability or Date of amendment request October which is located on page 89a to the consequences of an accident previously 13.1987.as supplemented March 31. evaluated:(2)create the possibilityof a 1989• right-hand column of the page so that it new or different kind of accident from Description of amendment request becomes sentence(2)replace the colon any accident previously evaluated;or(3) The proposed amendment would delete in the second .z,e of the new involve a significant reduction in a a Technical Specification as) �C "a" 4 A 2e with a comma margin of safety. surveillance test of the scram discharge and add"a"after the comma,and(3) , remove the period from the end of The eta!has reviewed the licensee's system which requires that a manual request and concurs with the following scram of the reactor be performed from Specification 3.3A2.d.combine it with - basis and conclusion provided by the a control rod configuration of less than - its conbnuation.whiclr is on page 90.end licensee in its submittal. or equal to 50%rod density once each and, the entire specification onto page I.The proposed changes do not involve a operating cycle.This test was intended significant increase in the probability or to verify the operability of the scram Basis for proposed no significant consequences of an accident previously discharge system.However,it is felt that hazards consideration determination: evaluated....the containment isolate° other surveillance requirements which The Commission ha provided function la not adversely impacted by this are present in the TS which do not standards for determining whether a change.This conclusion is based upon(the involve a scram.are already significant fact that the)containment isolation and in effect Bra cant hazards consideration exists integrity are ensured by the FO31 A/B valves which adequately demonstrate this as stated in 10 CFR 50.92 A proposed meeting existing regulatory criteria and operability.Additionally.the licensee amendment to an operating license for e because no increase to the allowable leakage has committed to performing an facility involves no significant hazards limits le being proposed, evaluation of the operation of the scram consideration If operation of the facility The removal of the FO11 A/B and F020 Al discharge volume prior to restart should in accordance with a proposed B valves from Table 3,94.2.14 is doe to the a am=occur.This proposed change• amendment would not:(1)Involve a fact that they w no longer motor.opersted therefore will reduce the.number of significant increase in the probability or and therefore do cot have to have thermal consequences of an accident previously unnecessary challenges to the reactor overload protection. All pertinent sections of FSAR Chapter 15 protection system and the resulting evaluated or(2)Create the possibility of were reviewed in support of this evaluation. transient.Other proposed changes are a new or differed kind of accident from Based on the above.neither the probability made to correct typcgaphical errors any accident previously evaluated or(3) nor the consequences of any previous which exist on the same page. Involve a significant reduction in a analysis(are)affected by the proposed Specifically.the proposed change margin of safety. change, would delete Specification 4.3.A2.g so The licensee has evaluated the U.The proposed changes do not create the that a scram at 50%control rod density proposed amendment against the possibility of t a new or different kind of would no longer be required.When any standards in 10 CFR 50.92 and the aaccident fr any accident previously scram occurs.the scram discharge licensee's findings are summarized Since the power from the FOt1 A/B and piping and the instrument volume vent below: ' Foes A/B valves to removed and the leakage and drain valves automatically shut to Operation in accordance with the requirements for containment integrity and isolate the system from the reactor proposed Amendment would not involve isolation do not change,no new concerns are blinding MUMS The piping and a significant hatarda consideration as created by this proposal.(therefore.the instrument volume thin receive the stated in 10 CFR 50.92 since it would proposed changes do not create the water discharged from the control rod not: Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1989 / Notices 1535 1.Involve a significant increase in the, agreement with previous tent They were not included in an earlier probability or consequences of en changes which have been.,sued but revision to the page;(42)add a Less accident previously evaluated.The ' which can be better addressed by the Than or Equal To Symbol to Table 3.14 removal of this surveillance requirement changes shown herein.All changes are for the aetpolnt of the 10%valve closure does not affect any accident as analyzed administrative in nature and improve trip level setting and add"is less then" in the FSAR,Other surveillance the clarity of the TS, to Note 3 ahead of"1X&"These were requirements exist in the Technical Specificallly,the proposed changes omitted from an earlier revision(37) Specifications which ensure the (listed by TS page number)would:(i) correct five grammatical errors(replace operability of the scram discharge add"Specification 3.0"and its title "drop"with"drops"in the second system to perform as required during a "General"to the Table of Contents end paragraph,remove"°hie"from the reactor protection system actuation. change the page number for fourth paragraph,replace"or with"or" 2.Create the possibility of a new or Specification 3.1 to"30f."The actual TS in the fourth paragraph,replace different kind of accident from any changes were issued as Amendment No. "setting"with"settings"in the fifth accident previously evaluated.The 83:(vi)add Tables 4.62,3.12.1,3.124, paragraph,and replace"and"with"or" elimination of en unnecessary 3.12-3,4.124,4.12-2 and 4.12.3 and their in the fifth paragraph before the"40"). surveillance requirement and challenge tides to the Listof Tables.The first table and delete"flow"from the sixth to the reactor protection system cannot was added to the TS as Amendment No. paragraph to indicate that the reactor initiate or contribute to a new or 28 and the rest by Amendment No.34 water cleanup trip lnstromentation is different accident but were not added to the List of Tables independent of flow;(58)correct the 3.Involve a significant reduction in a at that time;(vii)update the List of margin of safety.This surveillance Figures by adding a symbol to the title paragrallingph: of"channel"3 )iinsert in the ninth after requirement was intended to for Figure 3.1.2 and adding the in seraph:( )tnsert a equationfor the"2" demonstrate operability of the scram specification number to the title for in the mathematicalilbetwn s: the discharge system which is assumed in Figure 3.5-1,deleting Figure 3.5-9(which optimum interval between rash:ILLY losert'R the FSAR accident analyses.Removal of was removed from the TS by INTENTIONALLY this surveillance has no effect on these Amendment No.109),and adding Figure BLANK"for Item 1 10 in Table 3.2-2.This analyses since the design of the 3.5.12(which was Incorporated into the should have been included in the modified system together with other TS by Amendment No.109);(1)correct submittal for Amendment No.84;(70e) Technical Specification surveillance the spelling of"explicitly"in the first replace"paid with"rip"in Item 28 of requirements assure the operability of sentence;(2)add"a"into the first Table 3.2-2 for the Level Setting to the scram discharge system.The sentence of the definition of instrument more correctly identify the expression. resulting elimination of an unnecessary Check to correct the grammatical error; Also.insert"LLY ITEM challenge to the reactorprotectionINTENTIONALLY BLANK"for Items 22, ng (4)insert Amendment No."83"at the 23 and 24.These should have been system is consistent with industry and bottom of the page to reflect that the included in the submittal for regulatory philosophy and goals. page was affected by the amendment Amendment No.48 (70b)insert"dp"in e staff hes reviewed the licensee's Also,replace"trips"with"trip"in the Item 31 to Table 3.22 for the trip level no significant hazards consideration rust sentence of the definition forsetti Item 3 for the turbine steam line determination.Based on the review and startup/hot standby mode;(5)correct h ,flow trip function:(lac)correct the the above discussion,the staff proposes the spelling of the abbreviation for spelling of"permissible"in Note 13 (77) to determine that the proposed changes "continued"at the top of the page and the for the reactor water do not involve a significant hazards delete"e"from the Refueling Outage correct rl he symbol by replacing the consideration. definition:(a)replace"a"with"n"in setting Local Public Document Room Specification 1.O.X.e before the word Greater Than Symbol with a Greeter location:State University of New York. "systems.•since n means number of Than Or Equal To symbol;(89e and 90) Penfield Library,Reference and systems.Also,place the n in the last line rearrange the information so that the Documents Department,Oswego,New of the specification inside quotation appropriate paragraphs fall under the York 13128. marks;(8)replace"less than"with"less appropriate specification(4.3.A.2.e will Attorney for licensee:Mr.Charles M. than or equal to"for core flow in reside in the right side column and Pratt,10 Columbus Circle,New York, Specification 1.1.8;(29)correct the 3,3.A.24 will continue with the text on New York 10019. spelling of"resulting"in Specification the next page);(91)replace"rods"with NRC Project Director.Robert A. 1,2 and 2.2 Baser;(30b)correct the "rod"in Specification 3.3.8,1;(101) Capra spelling of"inoperable"in Specification delete"feedwater from"In the fourth 3,0.E Bales (34)rewrite the top complete sentence of the first paragraph Power Authority of the State of Newpara in the right column since rod worth York,Docket No.56333,James A mote raph,right column(3.1 Base°),to ndniadrer automatic cutout is Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant, more clearly ocovdescribe the nuclear determined 0 Oswego,New York instrumentation coverage for the by steam flow only-not designated modes of operation;(38) feedwater flow:('108)insert"fin for the Dote of amendment request.May 27. Insert"44"into the Amendment Number Paragraph number to identify 1988 list to show that the page was changed Specification 3,4.8;(114)add the change Description of amendment request: by this amendment(41)indicate in bars which should have been indicated The proposed amendment would correct Table 3.2-1 with an"r that the manual from Amendment No.95:(115a)delete various minor Technical Specification scram trip function must be operable in "of 3700 gpm"from 4.5.8.1 which should (TS)problems which have been the Run mode.Amendment No.98 have been removed in the submittal for discovered as a result of various inadvertently deleted this indication Amendment No.71 since it pertained to reviews by correcting typographical and when the amendment request was the emergency service water pump _ grammatical errors and removing submitted and issued:(41b)add two surveillance requirement Also,the test - unnecessary pages.Also,other minor Less Than Symbols to Table 3,1-1,one criteria is given•in the referenced TS changes are incorporated for before and one after"P,"for the turbine Erection;(118)correct the Paragraph consistency of terminology and control valve fast closure trip setting, referenced from 3.5.C to 3.5.C.1 in y 15838 Federal Register / Vol 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 19* / Notices Specification SA.C.L1/4(119)replace reposition the Comma from before"(18)" consequences elan accident previously "relief/War with"safety/r lief in to after"(is')"in the same paregrep1i evaluated or(2)Create the possibility of four places for canaistency of (201)correct the drywall TIP purge a new or different kind of accident from terminology,(122)identify the penetration number from X.358 to X-35E any accident previously evalua e:h or(3) specification by Inserting"F"to in two places;(211,212 213)correct the involve a significant redaction in a designate Specification 3.5.17;(123)insert table number from"3,9-2"to"4.7.2," margin of safety. "at"to grammatically correct the fourth which was Incorrectly renumbered in The licensee has evaluated the sentence of Specification 3.52:(142.) the submittal for Amendment No.40.to proposed amendment against the delete the"effective"date note since it change it be&to its original number, standards in 10 OR 50.22 and the is no longs needed:(1425)delete the (214)change the third sentence of the licensees'findings are summarized text on the page since it is no longer first paragraph of Specification 34 to below; needed and insert"This page read"If the test reveals the presence of The proposed cLangae involve no intentionally blank"(143)change 0.005 microcurles or more of removable significant hazards cemsideratlons They Specification"teal"to"3.6.Ea"and contamination,the source shall be are all administrative or editorial in Specification"3.8.8.2"to"3.6.12"in decontaminated and repaired.or be nature and include typographical errors, Specification 3.8.13 to correct the disposed of in accordance with reference.Also,delete the"effective" Commission regulations."for grammatical snore end clarification of date note since it is no longer needed: clarification.Also.Inert"a"into the specifications.Operation In accordance with the proposed amendment would (143a&b)delete the text on the pages third sentence of Specification 4.82 since it is no longer needed and insert before"certificate"to correct a not Involve a significant hazard. consideration as stated ent in 10(TR$092 "This page la intentionally blank;"(144) grammatical error.(219)Insert"one" since it would cot replace"operable"with"inoperable"in into the first sentence of Specificatioe the second sentence under Specification 3.9.C.2,a.before the first"feel oil."It 1.Involve significant Increase in the 3.6C to correct a typo error and correct was inadvertently omitted In the probability or consequences of an the meaning of the specification:(152) submittal for Amendment No,8.1;(228) accident previously evaluated.The delete"coincident high drywell pressure correct the spelling of"tests"in the intent of the proposed changes are to and"from the second sentence of the Bases for Specification 4.9.1:(236) clarify and correct the TS.The changes second paragraph since a plant correct the spelling of"BASE$;"(239) are administrative and include: modification 1143-034 removed the high replace"3.5.0"with"9.5.9"in correction of misspelled words,deletion drywell preemie permissive for ADS Specification 3.113,1.Also,correct the of expired pages,and correction of actuation from the ADS logic.It was spelling of"ventilation"in Specification grammatical errors.There are no reflected in other TS pages in 4.11.C.1;(240)insert"both RSV/systems setpolnt changes.safety limit changes, Amendment No.84 but this page change shall be"in the first sentence of surveillance requirement changes that was Inadvertently omitted from the Specification 3.11,.21 for clarity and were not previously evaluated or submittal.Also.in the same paragraph. delete"the"from the first line to correct changes to any limiting conditions for replace"low-low"with"low-low-low" a grammatical error,(242)replace operation.These changes have no to correct an error which has existed "3.11.E.1"with"4121.1"in impact on plant safety or plant since the initial TS was issued.Also, Specification 4.12.E2 to correct the operations and will have no impact on replace"reset/safety"with"safety/ error.(244a)replace"once/week"with Previously evaluated accidents. relief'in five places for terminology "once/month"for the test frequency 2.Create the possibility of a new or consistency,(153)insert"less than or specified in Section 4.12.A.1.b to correct different kind of accident previously equal to"before 212'Fat the top of the an error introduced when the submittal evaluated.The proposed changes are page for clarification.Also,correct the for Amendment No.80 was produced. Purely administrative In nature and spelling of"will"in the fourth paragraph This change was mistakenly involve only the correction of of the Bares for Specification 3.5.P (171) incorporated into the Amendment but typographical and similar errors.These correct the referenced table from 3,7-1 to was never analyzed by the licensee or proposed changes are intended to clarify 4.7.2 in Specification 4.7.A,2c.(1);(172) the NRC and restores the frequency to and Improve the quality of the IS.This correct the referenced table from 3.7.2 to that existing prior to Amendment No.80: cannot create the possibility of a new or 4.7-2 in Specification 4,7.A2.c.(4k(194) (244!)replace table"3.12.t with"3.12.3" different kind of accident add"40"at the bottom of the page as an to correct Specification 3.12.D,1.a and b: 3.Involve a significant reduction hn Amendment Number since this (2441)replace table"3.122"with"3.123" the margin of safety.The proposed amendment affected this page.Also, to correct Specification 3.120 Bases: changes correct errors which curently correct a grammatical error by replacing and(248)replace"Coordinator"with exist in the TS.The changes are all "on"with"of'in the fourth sentence of "Superintendent"in the first paragraph administrative in nature and will clarify Specification 4.7.A21;(377)insert"leas of Section 64 to be consistent with the the specifications by el arinattng errors than or equal to"ahead of"0$'in organization chart such as typographical errors.These Specification 3,7.A,4,a;(178)replace Basis*proposed no significant changes do not change any aetpolnts or "The"with"When"in the first line of hazards consideration determination: safety limits regarding isolation or Specification 3.7.A.5.s to correct a The Commission has provided alarms.The proposed changes do not grammatical error,(179)replace standards for detenaining.whetber a • affect the environmental monitoring "chamberreactor building"with significant hazards consideration exists program.These changes do not affect "chamber/drywall"for terminology as stated in 10 CFR 50.02.A proposed the plant's safety systems and do not consistency;(186)move the comma after amendment to an operating license fora reduce any safety margin. "trip"end insert it after"level"to facility involves no significant hazards The staff bas reviewed the licensee's correct a grammatical error in consideration if operation of the facility no significant hazards consideration Specification 4i'.D1,c.(2):(194)replace in accordance with a proposed determination.Bayed on the review and "AEC"with"Commission"in two amendment would not(1)Involve a the above discussion,the staff proposes places in the forth full paragraph.Also, significant increase in the probability of to determine that the proposed changes Federal Register / Vol 54, No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. age / Motets Mr do not involve a sigalficant hazards cosawnwecaa et as accident ptevioushe recite:Am io Dow pSAeaveliable for consideration. evaluated.Fowls;the mitts we awl does AFW pump gaseg sod dandy Sr Local Public Document Room not create the possibility of.new or different reactor cosine agates avmage location State University of New York, kind d accident or result la a reduction m a temperature above which the AFW Penfield Gibmargin of safety. Library.Reference end Therefore,Rochesw Gee and Eleevie system is to be tested boapeaLt than Documents Department.Oswego,New submits that the Issues associated with Ihis or equal is 305 degrees Febreebeit to York 13126. amendment request an outside the criteria of greater than or email to 289 donee Attorney for licensee:Mr.Charles M. ioCFRbo s1 and a no significant hazards Fahrenheit. Pratt,10 Co=bus Circle.New York, finding la warranted The proposed amendment would also New York I0019, The Commission has provided revise the surveillance requirements and NRC Project Director.Robert A. guidance concerning the application of frequency of verifying the flow path of Capra the stauderd in 10 CFR 50.921br the AFW System. determining whether a sig»ificant Basis or d Rochester Gassed Electric Cohporetiom, hazards consideration exists by hazards consip consideration determined=ne Docket No.80..44.R.E.Clime Nuclear providing certain examples of County. amendments that will likely be found to The Commission has provided Power Plum Wayne New York February standards for determiningsidwhether a Dote of amendment request involve no significant hazards significant hazards consideration exists 24,1969 considerations,The changes to the as stated in 10 CFR 550.,92 A proposed Description of amendment request: Technical Specifications proposed in amendment to an operating license for a The proposed amendment would modify this amendment request to this Technical facility involves no algaitiemt hazards the rod insertion limits for the Cycle 19 Specifications proposed in this considerations if operation of the facility fuel reload to ensure that all criteria for amendment request are similar to NRc in accordance with a proposed the reload are met Since the change is example(iv).Example(iv)relates to the amendment would not(1)Involve a not applicable to future cycles.it is granting of a relief from an operating significant increase in the probability or presented as a change with a limited restriction upon demonstration of consequences of an accident previously period of applicability. acceptable means of operation.This evaluated (2)Crests the possibility of a Basis for proposed no significant aseumes that acceptable operating new or different kind of accident from bawds consideration determination: criteria have been established and that any occident nt previously evaluated;or(3) The Commission has provided it is satisfactorily shown that the criteria involve a e ant reduction in a standards for determining whether a have been met. margin of safety significant hazards determination exists Based on this guidance and the The proposed amendment does not as stated in 10 CFR 50.92(c).A proposed reasons discussed above,the licensee (1)involve•significant increase in the amend ment to an operating license has concluded that the proposed change probability or consequences of an involves no significant hazards does not involve a significant hazards accident consideration if operation of the facility consideration.The Commission agreesprevioualyevdasted because, in accordance with the proposed with this conclusicm. based on licensee a evaluation.the amendment would not(1)involve a Local Public Document Room proposed changes ate clarifications that significant increase in the probabiliO/or location:Rochester Public Library.115 should more clearly define the operating consequences of an accident previously South Avenue.Rochester,New York modes and additional limitations that evaluated or(2)create the possibility of 14610. increase the range in which the AFW a new or different kind of accident from Attorney for licensee:Harry Voigt,Le system is to be tester additionally,the any accident previously evaluated;(3) Boeuf,lamb.Leiby and McRae,Suite proposed dews"taTS 4a should involve a significant reduction in a 1100.1133 New Hampshire Avenue. continue to emus prOpet operation of margin of safety. NW.,Washington,DC 20036. the AFW system flow paths and existing The licensee's analyses contained in NRCProject Director.Richard H. administrative controls provide . the February 24,1989,letter states the Wessman additional asauranCe of proper flow paths opershoa(2)create the coin owinm accordance with 10(FR seal.these Sacramento Municipal Utility District, possibility of a new ae different kind of changes to the Technical Specifications have met No.80.712•Remo Seca Nuclear accident from any accident previously been evaluated to determine if the operation Generating Station,Sacramento County. evaluated because the function of the of the facility in accordance with the California AFW System will not be loured and proposed amendment would Date of amendment request.October thisoperabi lty of the oyster and its 1.involve a significant increase in the 7.1988 as supplemented November 1n. ability to perform ib intended function probability or consequences of an accident twig will be mslatala (''(3)involve a previously evalue sib or Description of amendment request significant rednctlon in a margin of 2.create the possibility of■new or different kind of accident from any accident The proposed amendment would revise safety because adequate admitistrative s previously evaluated:or Technical Specifications(TS)3.4 and controls will be maintained to ensure 3.involve a significant reduction in a 4.8.The changes proposed to TS 3.4 the proper operation of the MW System margin of safety, would clarify the operational mode flow paths. The proposed change would require the applicability of that specification and Based on the above discussion.the bank D control rods to be withdrawn s steps the definition of Auxiliary Feedwater staff proposes to determine that the further during full power operation. (AFW)train,The references to"SFW" proposed amendment does not involve a withdrawing the rods above the insertion (Startup Feedwater)would be changed significant hazards consideration. limit increases the shutdown t e , in Specification 3A to reflect the fact Local Public Document Room decreases the elected rod worth,h,reduces that the startup valves are power peeking,sad does not alter stuck rodpart of the location:Martin Gather King Regional worth.Therefore,withdrawing the rods Is Main Feedwater(MFW)System. Library.7340 24th Sheet Bypass. conservative and allures that the safety The proposed amendment would Sacramento.Califosla 93622 criteria for the Cycle 1e reload are met,there delete the words"to the condenser" Attorney for liosnsee David S. is no significant increase in the probability or from TS 48.1 to reflect alternate Kaplan.Sacramento Municipal Utility ■ • 23838 Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19, 1989 / Notices District.e201 S Street P.O.Box 15830. evaluated.(2)agate the possibility of a new proposed changes are to revise Sacramento,California 05813 or different kind of accident from an accident surveillance requirement(SR)4.0.5.6.a.1 NRC Prefect Director.George W. previously evaluated or(3)involve a by increasing the base current value Knighton significant reduction in a margin of safety. from 28 amperes to 32 amperes for the 1.The proposed amendment does not Tennessee Valley Authority.Docket No. involve a significant increase in the containment air return fan(CARE) 50280,Browns Ferry Nuclear plant Unit probability or consequences of en accident motors. 2,Limestone County,Alabama previously evaluated.The primary factor In Basis for proposed no significant *Meng the calibration intervals is the drift of hazards consideration determination: Date of amendment request:February anani here and trip units.TVA has TVA provided the following information 24.1980(TS 283) performed setpoint scaling calculations that in its application to support the Description of amendment request: support the proposed change using The proposed amendment corrects manufacturers recommended intervals and Reviproposed w ofc the tpes: Browns Ferry Unit 2(BFN2),Technical Industry standard practices.This change Surveillance° Instruction t oa(SBA data of Specifications Tables 4.1.8,4.2.8,and does not involve a design change or physical 4.2.F for calibration frequencies.The change to the plant The revised surveillance thatthe-Containment Air R�aP has amendment also includes administrative frequencies Will not affect the c nsequenaa amperes amperage changes to instrument numbers,and of an accident ous eaal pares have too low.Amperage values Dt'avt lY obtained haw consistently remained on the deletes instrument checks for four The ar high reof the FCC[/RCIC upper and of the allowed tolerance value and instrument channels. diobraup 6186 pressure.steam line flow and thereby indicate the need for an increase in steam supply pressure instruments cars the haw amperage value.This surveillance Setpolnt and scaling calculations for adequately assured by the performance of amperage valve should be increased to a various instrument loops that contain functional tests every 31 days. value of 32 2778 amperes to establish a new transmitters manufactured by Tobar. Clarifications or corrections of data baseline that will be used to verify the Inc.require changing the calibration typographical errors are administrative motor operability of the CARFa. frequency to once every a months.Three changes which improve technical The Commission has provided loops at BFN2 are affected.Two of the specification reliability and therefore can Standards for determining whether a loops have calibration frequencies of have no detrimental impact once every 18 months.One loop has a a.The proposed change does not create the significant hazards determination exists frequency of once 12 possibility of a new or different kind of as stated in 10 CPR 30.92(0).10 CFR months.calibration The change every we accident from any accident previously 50.91 requires that at the time a licensee calibration evaluated because changing the technical requests an amendment it must provide requirefrequencies of once specifications to reflect different calibration to the Commission its analyses.using every 8 months for each of the three frequencies does not affect or change design the standards in Section 50.92.on the loops. operating limits or protective setpoints.No issue of no significant hazards Changes to instrument numbers for new or different modes of opera tine are consideration.Therefore,in accordance ten instruments in Tables 3.2.B and 4.2.B allowed by these changes. with 10 CFR 30.91 and 10 CFR 50.92.the are proposed.These changes are 3.The proposed change does not involve a of safetylicensee has performed and provided the e fluent reduction in• administrative in nature and do not margin following change the function.setting or because in no instance will these changes analysis: calibration interval of any of the ten affect the technical sechanges specification safety TVA has evaluated the proposedthat technical calibration nets.The instrument numbers limits.Thew changes have no affect on the it does D specification change and has determined Nat instruInstrument setpoints.All parameters will represent ignificant hazards are included in the technical continue to be monitored as currently consideration based on criteria established in spet�cations for completeness. required. 10 CFR 3o92(c).Operation of SQN in Instrument checks for four instrument The staff has reviewed the licensee's accordance with the proposed amendment channels in Table 4.2.8 that have no no significant hazards consideration will not remote or local indications will also be determination and agrees with the (1)Involve a significant Wrens in the deleted by the proposed amendment licensee's analyses.Therefore,the staff probability previoy evaluated.or lua equmaas ted In accident N Basis orproposed no s'ni icantFSARwsection 80.1.the primary tspurpos the eQof f rag f proposes to determine that the hazards consideration determination: application for amendments involves no the CARFs is to enhance the ice condenser The Commission has provided significant hazards considerations. and containment spray heat removal Standards for determining whether a Local Public Document Room operation by circulating sir from the upper significant hazards determination exists location:Athens Public Library,South compartment to the lower compartment. as stated In 10 CPR 50.92(c).10 CFR Street.Athens,Alabama 35811. through the ice condenser,and then back to 5291 requires that at the time a licensee Attorney for licensee:General . the upper compartment.The secondary requests an amendment,it must provide Counsel.Tennessee Valley Authority, purpose of the system le to limit hydrogen to the Commission its analyses,using 400 West Summit Hill Drive,Ell H33, concentration in potentially stagnant regions regions. the standards in Section 50.92,on the Knoxville.Tennessee 37902. by Therefore,increasing•flow f air bo s ea°perage issue of no a cant hazards . NRCAssistant Director.Suzanne as to saae, the base amperage from significant Za to 32 amperes will not affect the system's consideration.Therefore.in accordance Black function as previously evaluated This change with 10 CFR 50.91 and 10 CFR 50.92,the Tennessee Valley Authority,Docket. licensee has performed and providedwill enhance the ability to verify the CARP the motor operability by establishing a more following Noe.50427 and 50428,Sequoyah analysis: Nuclear Units 1 and 2, ton realistic data baseline as a result of actual udesr Plant NRC has provided standards forHamil plant test data.Therefore,the propoed determining whether a significant hazards County,Tennessee change does not involve an increase in the consideration exists as stated in 10 CFR Date of amendment requests:March probability or consequence°fan accident 50.92(c).A proposed amendment to an previously evaluated because the system's operating kenos involves nov'1989 rag significant Description of amendment requests: operation and a possib are not affected hazards considerations If operation of the The Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA) (2)Create the ty of a new or facility in accordance with the proposed different kind of accident from any amendment would not(1)involve a proposes to modify the Sequoyah previously analyzed.Increasing the base leg ificent increase in the probability or Nuclear Plant(SQN)Units 1 and 2 amperage In the amperage window of the consequences of an accident previously Technical Specifications(TS).The CARP motors will not create the possibility of I i i i I. I i decal Rargfater / Vol. 54, No. 74 f Wednesday. April is 19M / NODezea 75819 a new ordl9resa had of amidst then The second type of specifications does not involve asigatfcarbeaasde previously aaly>nd Distant Wet and originally contained in Appendix B consionatlae► function are not affected by this cheap.Al involve mown*and reporting Local Public Document Room previously sbitub fame DM chanlls*ed k being made regtdcamenas aseedated wi h locatica lfaivently drubsdo Linty. to tr esrn a mereeei here or ,th baseline for nomradb al eavironaaental matters Domments [utrne erevat0ance testing.Therefore,the � Dspaedemt,2ont Bancroft proposed change does not cream the such as aquatic and land mannerism. Avenue.Toedo,Ohio 4.7x00. possibility of a new or dfffetent and of Agmtie monitoring requirements were Morey forth:meeet Gerald accident hem any penny analyzed previously deleted from Appendix B by Charnoff.Bageln.Shaw.Pinatas.Potts a because the system's operetta and function License Amendment fti(March 11.1993). and Trowbridge.2300 N Street,NW.. are not affected by the change. Bogie for proposed no significant Washington.DC 20037. (3)Involve a significant reduction in a bozrap'a consideration determination: NRC Pro• , inscgpr margin of safety.This change will not involve The�yeion has provided >�+ N.Hannon a significant reduction in a safety margin of standards for determining whether a Waabiegton Public Power Supply the CARP eystem.The amperage window le signimmat hazards consideration exists System,Docket No.SO4,7.bladder solely used to rarity CARP motor nerahility to 10 CPA mot.A proposed amendment Project No.2,Beaton County. and to allow for variations inboard voltage due to changes in board lading,Neither to an operating license involves no Washington system operation nor function will be significant hazards consideration if Dote of amendment request February affected by this&sass because It only operation of the facility in accordance 10.2987 and March 31.199S. establishes a more realistic data baseline for with the proposed amendment would Description of amendment request motor reliability,Therefore,no reduction in a not(I)involve a significant humane in License Condition Z.G(14)pertaining to margin of safety is involved by the proposed the probability or consequences of an the WNP-2 fire protection requirements change because the system's operation and accident previously evaluated:(2)create would be modified to Incorporate• function are not affected by the change, the possibility of a new or different kind standard fire protection license The staff has reviewed the licensee's of accident from any accident previously condition recommended by the staff in no significant hazard.consideration evaluated:or(3)involve a significant Generic Ietter 81.10.The following determination and agrees with the oning licensee's analysis.Therefore,the staff reduction respect n a to each of safety. Technical Sue proposed to be removed: lire proposes to determine that the With licensee eah haso these three protection are re Detection obe application for amendments involves no criteria.analysistheno ignisignificant hazardsprovided an 3 rumen "Fin Detection significant hazards considerations. f in tstfora Instrumentation" Local Public Document Room consideration in its request for a license 3/4x 0 "Fire Suppression Systems location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County amendment as follows: 3/4.7.7,"Fire Related Aswan" Libra Wee Broad Street Chattanooga- (1)[evolve a significant increaseare m the 0.2.2,e(Fire Brigade staffing ry' g probability v lua fed.consequences of an accident Tennessee 37402. requirements) Attorney for licensee:General previously,f osed char Related bases sections would be proposed change is administntiw and modified and the index would be Counsel,Tennessee Valley Authority, will not affect the probability or 400 West Summit Hill Drive,Eli 533, consequences of an accident previcve:y revised to delete the sections removed.Knoxville,Tennessee Tennessee 37902. evaluated.ih rther.since the radiological Generic Ian 8040.dated April 24, NRC Assistant Director. Suzanne efnnent monitoring requirements have been 1908,and 99.71 dated August 2,7990. Bieck incorporated Into Appendix A.the ability to from the NRC provided guidance to monitor,detect and control radioactive licensees contenting removal of the fire Toledo Edison Company and The discharge from the plant remains Cleveland Electric fituminatfng unchanged. protection proposed specification.nt The licensee's Create the amendment follows CompReeseamy,Docket No.90.340.Davis- different kind d eoeidant G®an or these Generic. Besse Nuclear Power Station.Unit No.7, previously evaluated r Bores for proposed No Significant Ottawa County,Ohio The proposed change does not affect any of Hazards Conafderatlon Determination: Dote of application for tmendmens' the assumptions used in previous accident The Commission has provided August G.1987 evaluations:all accidents continue to be standards for determining whether a Description of amendment request bounded by previous ambits.Accoedingty, eignifmnt banrde consideration exists The amendment would delete in its deletion of thew environmental technical as stated S 10 CPR S0M.A proposed entirety Appendix B m the Operating specifications which have been previoesiy amendment to an operating license for a satisfied License,"Environmental Technical any new or ddiill fferentt kind of ac the cidentWry ol facility involves no significant hazards Specifications."The amendment would Further,the plant will continue to operate in considerations if operation of the facility Mao delete that portion of the License the same reamer as prevlotrly,hereby in accordance with a proposed Condition 21(1)which referred to the ensuring tbat no new or different End of amendment would not(2)Involve a Environmental Technical Specifications. accident can occur. significant increase in the probability or Appendix B originally consisted of two (3)involve a significant reduction in a consequences of an aeddent previously typos of specifications when issued,one margin of safety. evaluated;(2)Create the possibility of a related to radiological effluents and the The proposed deletion of Appendix 3 andof& the deletion of that portion of License new different ptviol previously accident :ore other environmental related to r Prior Condition 2,F(1)Mum refer'to Appendix B any accident peavtarfy evaluated or(3) environmental matters.Prior to thin involves no newt In i margin et safety Involve a significant reduction in a request the NRC staff issued since the nqu ewes for manimdng, margin of safety. Amendment 80(July 2.1985)which detection and control of radiologlcd aifluen s The proposed revisions to the license incorporated more comprehensive con bean unchanged Is Appendix A. condition and to the technlral Technical Specifications on radiological Based on the above considerations, specification are in accordance with effluents into Appendix A of the the staff proposes to determine that the the guidance provided in Generic letter Operating License and deleted these proposed deletion of Appendix B from 8610 for licensees requesting removal of requirements from Appendix B of the the Operating License and the deletion fire protection technical specifications. Operating License. of a portion of License Condition 2.P.(1), The incorporation of the NRC-approved 1584O Federal Register / Vo1 M. Na 74 / Wednesday. April 19, 1989 / Notices fire protection program.and the former involves significant hazards • surveillance.Currently the plant must be technical specification requirements by considerations, shutdown if a surveillance interval I. reference to the procedures The proposed amendment includes inadvertently surpassed. implementing these requirements,Into the removal of fire protection technical Technical Specification 4. ,4 would be the Final Safety Analysis Report(TSAR) specifications in four areas:(1)fire changed to allow the plant to proceed and the use of the standard license detection systems,(2)fire suppression through or to required operational condition on fire protection will ensure systems,(3)fire-rated assemblies(fire modes to comply with Action that the fire protection program, barriers),and(4)fire brigade staffing requirements even though applicable including the system.,the requirements.While it is recognized that surveillance requirements may not have administrative and technical controls, a comprehensive fire protection Program been performed.Currently Technical the organization.and the other plant is essential to plant safety,many details Specifications 3.0.4 and 4.0.3 are in features associated with fire protection of this program that are currently conflict whon such a procession is will be on a consistent status with other addressed in technical specifications necessary to come out of an Action plant features described in the PSAR. can be modified without affecting statement The proposed revision would The provisions of 10 CPR 50.59 would nuclear safety These requirements address the meting conflict then apply to changes the licensee being removed from the technical The amendment would remove the considers making in the fire protection specifications have been incorporatedprovisions of program.In thh ontext the into the pre protection implementing statement,",.the determination of the involvement of an procedures.The administrative controls from 3.0,4 are not applicable," ing unreviewed safety question defined in section of the technical specifications from the f Chapter 3 which Li 10 CFR 50.59(®)(2)would be made based ensure that licensee initiated changes to Conditions e for Operation c do not these re uirement.will receive careful require the shutdown since the proposed on the"acddant..,Qrevlouslyavaluated" 9 revision 3.0.4 makes such wording being the postulated fire in the fire review by qualified individual& superfluous.The licensee would retain hazards analysis for the area affected The transfer of these items from the the existing exceptions to 3.0.4 in those by the change.Hence the proposed technical specifications toe separate specifications that do fire protectionrequire a plant license condition would establish anprogram is believed to be shutdown. adequate basis for defining the scope of an administrative action which does not Bases associated with these changes to the fire protection program impact the operation of the facility in a specifications would also be revised. which can be made without orior manner that involves significant hazards Basis for Proposed No Significant Commission approval.4.0.,without considerations. Baron's Consideration Determination: unnviewed safety Based on the above considerations the introduction of an The Commission hasprovided question. Commission proposes to determine that standards for determ whether a Neither the proposed license condition therase requested changes to the WNP-2 significant hazards consideration exists nor the removal of the existing technical License andicant azSpacifieatlone as statedin 10 CPR 50.92.A proposed specification requirements on fire co involve no eigirificant hazards q considerations. amendment to an operating license for a protection creates the possibility of a Local Public Document Roam facility involves no significant hazards new or different kind of accident from location:Richland City library,Swift considerations if operation of the facility those previously evaluated,They also and Northgate Streets,Richland, in accordance with a proposed do not involve a significant reduction in Washington 99352 amendment would not(I)Involve a the margin of safety since the license Attorney.for licensees:Nicholas S. significant increase in the probability or condition does not alter the requirement Reynolds,Esq.,Bishop.Cook,Purcell consequences of an accident previously that an evaluation be performed for the and Reynolds,1400 L Street.NW„ evaluated(2)Create the possibility of a identification of an unreviewed safety Washington.DC 20005-3502 and C.E. new or different kind of accident from question for each proposed change in Doupe.Esq.,Washington Public Power any accident previously evaluated:or(3) the fire protection protection program. Supply System,P.O.Box gee,3000 Involve a significant reduction in a Consequently,the proposed license George Washington Way,Richland. margin of safety. condition for the removal of the fire Washington 99352 The changes requested are to protection requirements do not involve a NEC Project Director,George W. specifications 3.0.4.4.0.3 and 4AA and significant increase in the probability or Knighton are as recommended by the staff in consequences of an accident previously Generic Letter 8740. evaluated. Washington Public Power Supply The Supply System has evaluated this The Administrative Controls section System.Docket No.60597.Nuclear amendment request per 10 CFR 50.59 of the technical specifications(Section Project No.2,Banton County, and 50.92 and determined that it does 6)includes a requirement for fire Washington not represent an unreviewed safety protection program implementation Date of amendment request:February question or a significant hazard.The procedures.This section will also be 2,1989 proposed amendment does not modified as necessary to define the Description of amendment request (1)Involve a significant increase in roles of the Plant Operations Committee Technical Specification Section 3.0.4. the probability or consequences of an and the Corporate Nuclear Safety "Limiting Condition for Operation." accident previously evaluated because: Review Board in reviewing the fire would be revised to allow mode changes The change to Specification 3.0.4 will protection program and implementing when in an action statement that allows allow mode change.while the plant is in procedures.The fire protection program continued operation for an unlimited an Action statement that does not will be subject to administrative period of time.Currently such mode prohibit power operation.Exception to • controls consistent with other programs changes are prohibited 3.04 has already been taken in many of addressed by license conditions.These Technical Specification 4.0.3 would be the individual Action statements, changes are themselves administrative changed to delay compliance with an Incorporating the proposed change into in nature and do not impact the action statement for up to 24 hours in 3.0.4 will ensure that exceptions will be operation of the facility in a manner that order to allow performance of a missed consistently applied when justified. . Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1989 / Notices 15641 Deletion of the individual exceptions exceptions within 3.0.4 will ensure their the fourth outage.The fourth refueling will have no impact upon the consistent application. outage is now scheduled to begin on requirements in the Specifications since The change to 4.0.3 will allow up to 24 April 29,1900.This amendment the exception to 3,0.4 will now be hours to perform a missed surveillance. application has been submitted to allow contained within 3.04. In most cases this will eliminate the restart in the event that requirements of The change to Specification 4.0.3 will need fora plant shutdown.The overall the Regulatory Guide are not met by the allow delay in the application of Action effect is a net gain in plant safety due to end of the outage. requirements for up to 24 hours when a avoidance of unnecessary shutdowns The Supply System has reviewed the surveillance has been missed.Because due to mined surveillances. requested amendment per 10 OR 50.59 surveillances normally verify system or The change to 4.0.4 is administrative and 50.92 and has determined that no component operability,as opposed to in nature and therefore does not affect unrevlewed safety questions or discovering inoperability,the allowance any margin of safety. significant hazards will result Further, of an additional 24 hours to demonstrate Based on the above considerations the the licensee stated that the proposed operability is not significant.Without Commission proposes to determine that change will not(1)Involve a significant the 24 hour delay it is likely that a the requested changes to the WNP-2 increase in the probability or mined surveillance would force a plant License and Technical Specifications consequences of an accident previously shutdown. Involve no significant hazards evaluated because the existing Avoidance of this transient state and consideration. instrumentation consists of four associated thermal cycling is beneficial Local Public Document Room redundant safety-related channels. and far outweighs any Incremental location:Richland City Library.Swift Additionally.there are unrelated uncertainties regarding system and Northgate Streets,Richland. systems in place to provide operators operability associated with the Washington 99352. with sufficient data to assess reactor additional 24 hours in which to perform Attorneys forlicensees:Nicholas S. conditions(e.g..control rod position a missed surveillance, Reynolds.Esq.,Bishop,Cook.Purcell monitors,reactor vessel level and The change to Specification 4.04 will and Reynolds.1400 L Street.NW.. pressure r is the unlikely event not result in a change to the design or Washington.DC 200053502 and G.E. of an accident condition to prior - operation of the facility and is Dope,Esq.,Washington Public Power replacement.(2)Create the possibility of administrative in nature.For the reasons Supply System.P.O.Box 989.3000 a new or different kind of accident cited above,this change will not result George Washington Way,Richland because no function of the flux monitor in an increase in the probability or Washing=99352. consequences of an accident. NRC Project Director.George W. system is being changed;therefore,no new or different kind of accident is (2)Create the possiblllty of a new or Knighton conceivable.(3)Involve a significant different kind of accident from any Washington Public Power Supply reduction in a safety margin as adequate accident previously evaluated because: System.Docket No.50,797,Nuclear instrumentation is provided to allow the The change to 3.0.4 will allow the Project No 2,Benton County, operator to assess reactor conditions plant to continue operation in an Action Washington without this monitor in the unlikely statement that already allows continued event of an accident condition that operation.As such,no new modes of Date of amendment request:March 24. operation are being introduced by this 1989 could cause the monitor currently in change. Description of amendment request: place to fall prior to replacement , The change to 4.0.3 would allow the License condition 2.C.(1b).Attachment?. Based on the above considerations the plant to continue operation for an Item 3(b).Wide Range Neutron Flux Commission proposes to determine that additional 24 hours after discovery of a Monitor.requires the licensee to the requested changes to the WNP-2 mined surveillance,Missing a implement the requirements of Technical Specifications involve no surveillance does not mean that a Regulatory Guide 127.Rev.2 for flux significant hazards considerations. component or system is inoperable.In monitoring prior to startup following the Local Public Document Room most cases surveillances demonstrate fourth refueling outage. location:Richland City Library.Swift the continued operability of the Basin for Proposed No Significant and Northgate Streets.Richland components and systems,All systems Hazards Consideration Determination: Washington 99362. and components currently required to be The Commission has provided Attorneys for licensees.Nicholas S. verified operable by Technical standards for determining whether a Reynolds,Esq..Bishop,Cook.Purcell Specification requirements will continue significant hazards consideration exists and Reynolds.1400 L Street.NW.. to be maintained operable.This change as stated in 10 OR 5022 A proposed Washington,DC 200063502 and G.E. w ill not affect the design of the plant amendment to an operating license for a Doupe.Esq.,Washington Public Power and will not allow the plant to be facility involves no significant hazards Supply System.P.O.Box 988.3000 operated outside the currently allowed considerations if operation of the facility George Washington Way,Richland modes of operation. in accordance with a proposed Washington 99352. The change to 4.0.4 will alleviate a amendment would not(1)Involve a NRC Project Director.George W. contradiction within the specifications. significant increase in the probability or Knighton This change is administrative and does consequences of an accident previously PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED NOTICES not affect any of the accident analyses. evaluated;(2)Create the possibility of a OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE (3)Involve a significant reduction in a new or different kind of accident from OF AMENDMENTS TO OPERATING margin of safety because: any accident previously evaluated;or(3) The change to Specification 3.0.4 will Involve a significant reduction in a SIGNIFLICENSES AND PROPOSE NO allow mode changes in Action statement margin of safety. CONSIDERATION HAZARDS ONDE that do not require plant shutdown. In making this request the licensee CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION Exceptions to 3,0.4 are already has noted that significant progress has AND OPPORTUNITY FOR IDIAARBNG contained within many of the applicable been made toward meeting the The following notices were previously Action statements.Incorporating the requirement prior to startup following published as separate individual 15812 F decd Register J Vol. 54. Na 74 / Wednesday. ARA In., lie / Notices notice&The notice content was the Education Betiding.Comonwaslt and made a determination hoed on that same as above.They were published as Walnut Streets.Haatsborg. assessment,flea ea Skated individual notices either because time Pennsylvania 17126. For farther detn&with respect to the did not allow the Commission to wattWisconsin Frticisic Power Company& action caw(1)the atghest(oes for for this biweekly notice or because the Docket Ni,..60-206 and 60-361 Point amendments.(2)the amendmems,and action involved exigent circumstances. Beach Nuclear Plant,Unit Now 1 and; (3)the Comletssiee's related letters', They are repeated here because the Town of Creels.Manitowoc Sefety Evaluations and/or biweekly notice lists all amendments Envirronment&Asreeamenta as issued or proposed to be issued County,Wisconsin indicated.All of these Items me Involving no significant hazards Dote of application for amendments: available for public Inspection at the consideration. March 23.1069 Commission's Public Document Room. For details.see the individual notice Brief description of amendments the Colman Building,2120I.Street NW., in the Federal Register on the day and request The amendments would revise Washington,DC,and at the local public page cited.This notice does not extend provisions of the Point Beau Nuclear document rooms for the particular the notice period of the original notice. Plant,Unit Na.1 and 2.Technical facilities involved.A copy of items(2) Philadelphia tattle Company,Doekat Specifications relating to the pertinence', and(3)may be obtained upon request enrichments for storage of fuel addressed to the U.S.Nuclear No.SO4*Umedck Generatlmg Station. assemblies in the new fuel storage vault Regulatory Commission.Washington. Unit 1,Montgomery County, and spent fuel storage pooL IX 20535,Attention:Director,Division Pennsylvania Dote of individtrol notice In Pederd Dote of amendment request March 23. Register.March 31,108g(54 FR 13261) of Reactor Protects. 1089 Expiration dote of individual notion Arkansas Pewee JZ Light Camps,. Brief description of amendment Comment period expires April 11,19019. Docks No.58 31.7.Arisen Nudear request This amendment modifies the Notice period axons May 2.2984 One,Unit 1.Pops Canty.Arenas Technical Spetiticatlous to conform to Local Public Document Room Dote amendment request rune 30. the staffs technical position PS&1. location:Joseph P.Mann Library.1516 1988 "Adequacy of Station Electric Sixteenth Sheet.Two Riven. Brief description of amendment The Distribution System voltages" Wiseamia amendment modified the Technical Dote of publication of individual NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF Spedfiatlone by adding surveillance notice in Federal Register.March 29, AMENDMENT TO FACILITY requirements for the automatic 1989(54 FR 12998) OPERATING LICENSE actuation of the Aunt trip attachments Expiration dote of individual notice Dud the of the reactor trip braaken and for the Comment period expired April 13.ice& n6 period since publication of controlled breakrectifier .endSCR)trip Notice period expires April 28.1909. the last biweekly notice.Me Local Public Document Room Commission has Issued the following relays used to interrupt power to the location:Pottstown Public Library.500 amendments.The Commission has control rods.as required by Generic High Street.Pottstown,Pennsylvania determined for each of these Letter(GL)83-28.Items 4.3 and 4.4.and 19464. amendments that the application CL 8640. Philadelphia Electric Company,Public complies with the standards and Dote of issuance March 10.1989 Service Electric i and Gas ,Company, requirements of the Atomic Energy Act Effective dote:March 10.1989 Delmarva and Light Coogan, of 1954,as amended(tbe Act).and the Amendment No.:117 end arva Power r Light tCongaCommission's rules and regulations.The Facility OperatingLicenseAo.DAR- and At Nos.50t2T1 Electric Company.Peac Commission has made appropriate 51.Amendment revised the Technical Docfindings as required by the Act end the Specifications. Bottom Atomic Power Station.Unit Noe. Commission's roles and regulations into Date of initial notice ha Pectoral 2 and 3.York County.Pennsylvania CFR Chapter L which are set forth to the Register September 21.nee(53 FR Date of amendment request March t0. license amendment. 36988)The Cosmetic's rested 2989 Notice of Consideration of Issuance of evaluation ot the amendment is Brief description of amendment Amendment to Facility Operating contained in a Safety Evaluation dared request This amendment would modify License and Proposed No SigAfficant Match 10.MIL the Technical Spxifications to reflect Hazards Consideration Determination No significant hasonis consideration removal of the requirement for and Opportunity for Hearing in commeate recent Na calibration of the Source Range Monitor connection with these actions was Local Public Document Room (SRM)and intermediate Range Monitor published in the Pedant Regime a location:Tomlinson library.Arkansas (IRM)Detectors Not in Startup Position indicated No request for a hearing or Tech University,Russellville.Arkansas within 24 hours before each startup or petition fee leave to intervene was filed 72801 controlled shutdown on the basis that following this notice. Baltimore Cr and Hectic any, the currently existing functional test and Unless otherwise indicated.the Docket Na 30.316.Calvert Cliffs preventive maintenance program Commission hes determined that these Nuclear Power Pleat,Iidt Na 2 calibration test is adequate for this amendments satisfy the criteria for Calvert Conte, arylend Instrumentation. categorical exclusion in accordance Date of publication of individual with 10 CFR 51.22.Therefore vacant Dote ofapplication for amendment; notice in Federal Register.March 21, to 10 CFR 52.z2(b),no environmental October 14.1988 as supplemented 1989(S4 FR 11590) impact statement or environmental February 17.19% Expiration dote of individual notice: assessment need be prepared for these Brief drsccnption of amendment.This April 20.1989 amendments,If the Commission has amendment provides a temporary.one- Loco/Pub&Document Room prepared an environmental assessment time extension,of up to 54 drys.to the location:Government Publications under the special circumstances surveillance interval.required by TS Section.State Library of Pennsylvania. provision in 10 CFR 51.22(b)and has Surveillance(75)Requirement 4.7.8.1.c. Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19, 2989 / Notices 25841 for the performance of functional tests action noticed and did not effect the Date of initial notice in Federal on a representative sample of 20%of staffs proposed no significant hazards Register.February 22.1989(54 FR 7832) each individual type of snubber, consideration determination.The The Commission's related evaluation of This temporary change shall expire at Commission's related evaluation of the the amendment is contained in a Safety 22:39 p.m.on May 17.1989 or upon amendments is contained in a Safety Evaluation dated March 28.1909. reaching 199.9'F average reactor Evaluation dated March 14,1989. No significant hazards consideration coolant system(RCS)temperature No significant hazards consideration comments received'No. during initial RCS heatup following the comments received,No. Local Public Document Room Unit 2 Cycle 9 refueling outage. Local Public Document Room location:Atkins Library.University of whichever conies first.At that point.the location:University of North Carolina at North Carolina,Charlotte(UNCC specified maximum surveillance interval Wilmington.William Madison Randall Station),North Carolina 28223 shall revert to the normally required 18- Library,801 S.College Road, month period. Wilmington.North Carolina 28403.1297. Florida Power and Light Company, In addition,this amendment corrects Commonwealth CompaaY, Po It Plant UMtset Nos. 9and 4 and Dade Coup nomenclature nubbs."aend rs t TS 3obsol Docket Nos.50-54 and 50435 Byron Florida County, note in TS 4.7.8.1 8.1 deletes Ian obsolete Station,Units I and 2 Count',note in en Concerning the date Illinois:Docket Nos.50458 and 50.457. pie of application for amertdmenta: steam generator snubbers were first September 12.1988 required to be tested. Braidwood Station,Unit Nos. and 2. D issuance:March 24,1989 Will County,Illinois Brief description of amendments ate oThese amendments modify the I f Effective date March 24,1889 Date of application for amendments: Technical Specifications to permit the Amendment No.:119 December 12,1988 holding of a Senior Reactor Operator's Facility Operating License No.DPI?. Brief description of amendments: license on a pressurized water reactor 69.Amendment revised the Technical These amendments modify Technical other than Turkey Point.by the Specifications. Specifications having cycle-specific Fxy Operations Superintendent to serve as Date of initial notice in Federal limits by replacing the values of those an acceptable qualification for that Register.February 27.1989(54 FR 7309) !'amts with a reference to the Operating position. The Commission's related evaluation of Limits Report for the value of those Date of issuance:March 27,1989 the amendment is contained In a Safety limits. Effective date:March 27,1989 Evaluation dated March 24.2989 Date of issuance:March 28.2989 Amendment Nos.135 and 129 No significant hazards consideration Effective dote:March 28,1989 Facility Operating Licenses Nos. comments received:No P i1: Local Public Document Room Amendment Nos.:28 for Byron 15 for DPRJS and Technical Amendments location:Calvert County Library,Prince BrF dwood revised Do the Tealn t/ in Federions. al Frederick,Maryland Facility,NPFa7ng License Nos.NPF- Dote of initial notice in (53 FR NRC Project Director Robert A 37,NPF 65 NPF 72,and NPF-75 The Register November 2.198t1(la ed Capra amendments revised the Technical 44250).The Commission's related Specification. evaluation of the amendments is Carolina Power a Light Company.et a1, Date of initial notice in Federal contained in a Safety Evaluation dated Docket Nos.30-325 and 50-324, Register.February 22,1989(54 FR 7628) March 27.1989. Brunswick Steam Electric Pleat,Units 1 The Commission's related evaluation of No significant hazards consideration and 2,Brunswick County,North the amendments is contained in a Safety comments received:No Carolina Evaluation dated March 28,1989. Local Public Document Room Dote of application for amendments: No significant hazards consideration location:Environmental and Urban October 28,1988.as supplemented comments received:No. Affairs Library.Florida International March 8.1989 Local Public Document Room UMvereity.Miami,Florida 33199. 4. Description of amendments:The location:For Byron Station,Rockford Georgia Power Company,Oglethorpe amendment revises the Technical Public Library,215 N.Wyman Street, Power Corporation.Municipal Electric Specifications by modifying footnote Rockford Illinois 62101;for Braidwood ••',in Table 1.2,"Operational Station.the Wilmington Township Authority of Georgia.City of Dalton Conditions."The revised footnote Public Library.201 S.Kankakee Street, Georgia. et No. 50,7x1 and b6360. allows the reactor mode switch to be Wilmington,Illinois 80481. Edwin I.Hatch Nuclear Plane Units 1 Georgia placed in the Refuel position while aand 2,Applinl County,for single control rod is being moved,as e l Power Company,Docket Unito.50• Date of application for amendments: 370.McGuire Nuclear Station. 2, opposed to only when being recoupled, Meeklenburs County North Carolina December 2 and 22,1988.May al, provided the one-rod-out Interlock is August 8.and December 14.1988 operable. Dote of application for amendment: Brief description of amendments:The Date of issuance:March 14.1989 December 7.1985 amendments modified paragraphs 2.C.4 Effective dote:March 14.1969 Brief description of amendment The of the Unit I license and 2.11,of the Unit Amendment Nos.:125 and 155 amendment deleted license condition 2 license to require compliance with the Facility Operating License Nos.DPR• 2.C(12)and its related Table 2 and amended Physical Security Plan.This 72 and DPR•82.Amendments revise the replaced it with a condition which was a Plan was amended to conform to the Technical Specifications, part of Table 2. requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.Consistent Date of initial notice in Federal Dote of issuance:March 28.1989 with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.55 Register.January 11,1989(54 PR 1019) Effective date:March 28.1989 search requirements must be Additional information of a clarifying Amendment No.:75 implemented within 60 days and nature was submitted by the licensee by Facility Operating License No.NPF- miscellaneous amendments within 280 letter dated March 6,1989.The ST.Amendment revised the Operating days from the effective date of these additional Information did not alter the License amendments. r 15841 Federal RegWnr / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 1916 / Notices Dote of issuance.March 28.19x9 building exhaust air subsystem electric Date of iasuarrx•March 23,1919 Effective date::March 28.1989 heaters to reference operation at 38 kW Effective direr:March 23.1919 Amendment Not:181 and 91 instead of 50 kW.The other requests are Amendment Na:52 Facility Operating License Not.DPR- under staff review. Facility Operating,License No.APR 37 and NPF-5.Amendments revised the Dote of issuance:March 2a,1989 3&Amendment revised the Technical Operating Licenses. Effective dote:March 28,;989.The Specifications. Dote , initial notice in Federal amendment will be fully implemented Dote of initial notice in Federal Resister.February 22,1989(54 FR 7635) six weeks after date of issuance. Refasten February 11989(54 FR 6195). The Commission's related evaluation of Amendment No.:a The Commission's related evaluation of the amendments is contained in a letter Facility Operating Uterus's No.APR the amendment is contained in a Safety to Georgia Power Company dated 7&Amendment revised the Technical Evaluation dated March 23,19r0. March 28.1989 and a Safeguards Specifications. Evaluation report dated Match 28,1988. Dote of initial notice in Federal No spifleant/retards consideration No significant hazards consideration Register.February 14,1989(54 FR 1789) comments received:No. comments received:No. The Commission's related evaluation of Local Public Document Room Local Public Document Room the amendment is contained in a Safety location:University of New Orleans location:Appling County Public Library. Evaluation dated March 2&1969, Library,Louisiana Collection.Lakefront. 301 City Hall Drive.Baxley.Georgia No significant hazards consideration New Orleans,Louisiana 70122. 31513, comments received:No. Louisiana Power and Light Company. Local Public Document Rooms Docket No.$0462.Waterford Steam Houston Lighting&Power Company. City Public Service Hoard of Sao Locotion:Wharton County Junior Electric Station Unit 3,St.Charles Antonio Central Power and LightCollege.J.M.Hodges Learning Center. Parish,Louisiana Company,City of Aunt 6 and Austin Public Libr .Texas,Docket 911 Boling Highway,Wharton.Teas Dote of amendment request. No.30-498.South Texas Project.Unit 1. 774ary.810 December 23,1988 Matagorda County.Texas Guadalupe Street.Austin,Texas 78701 Brief description of amendment The Date of amendment request:January Louisiana Power and Light Company, amendment revised the Technical 17,1989 Docket No.563 Waterford Steam Specifications to correct the terminology Brief description of amendment:The Electric Station,Unit 3,St Charles of control room isolation for toxic gas amendment modified the Technical Pariah,Louisiana protection action. Specifications(TS)by incorporating the Date of amendment request-October Date of issuance::March 23.1919 combined TS for Units 1 and 2 issued 31.1988 Effective date:March 23.1989 with the full power license for Unit 2 Brief description of amendment The Amendment No.:53 into the Unit 1 license.The changes amendment revised the Technical Focility Operating License No.NPR were administrative in nature only since Specifications for containment 3&Amendment revised the Technical the two units are identical, penetration circuit breaker testing by Specifications. Dote of issuance:March V%1989 clarifying the test requirements for Dote of initial notice in Federal Effective date:March 28.1989 integrated functional testing and by Register.February 1.1989(54 FR 5183). Amendment No.:5 adding the surveillance requirements to The Commission's related evaluation of Facility Operating License No.NPR Table 3.84. the amendment is contained ins Safety 7&Amendment revised the Technical Date of issuance:March 23.1969 • Evaluation dated March 23.1989. Specifications, Effective date:March 23,1989 No significant hazards consideration Dote of initial notice in Federal Amendment No:51 comments received:No. Register.February 2.1989(54 FR 5292) Facility Operating License No.NPR Local Public Document Room The Commlaeion's related evaluation of 38,Amendment revised the Technical location:University of New Orleans the amendment is contained in a Safety Specifications. Library,Louisiana Cllction•lakefront.dated March 28,i989, Dote of initial notice in Federal New Orleans.Lou Collection. 70122. No significant hazards consideration Register.November 30.1906(53 FR comments received:No. 48332).The Commission's related Louisiana Paine and Light Company. Local Public Document Rooms evaluation of the amendment is Docket No.50-082.Waterford Steam Location:Wharton County Junior contained in a Safety Evaluation dated Electric Station.Unit 3.St.Charles College,J.M.Hodges Learning Center. March 23.1989. Parish•lauisuoa an Baling Highway.Wharton.Texas No significant hazards consideration 77488 and Austin Public library.610 comments received.No. Dote of amendment request. Guadalupe Street.Austin,Texas 78701 Local Public Document Room December i 1981 as supplemented location:University of New Orleans January 5989 Houston Lighting&Power Company, Library,Louisiana Collection.Lakefront. Brief description of amendment The City Public Service Board ofSan New Orleans,Louisiana 70172 amendment revised the Technical Antonio.Central Power and light Specifications by deleting requirements Company.City of Austin.Texas.Docket Louisiana Power and Light Company, for overcurrent protection on No.50.49x,South Texas Project.Unit 1, Docket No.50382.Waterford Steam disconnected motor•operated.valve Matagorda County.Texas Electric Station Unit 3,St Charles actuator compartment heater breaker Date of amendment request:January Parish,Louisiana from Table 3.8-1. 25.1989 Date of amendment request: Date of issuance:March 27.1089 Brief description of amendment The December 23.1988 Effective dote:March 27.1919 amendment addressed one of the Brief description of amendment The Amendment No.:54 requests of the amendment application amendment revised the Technical Facility Operating)cane No.NP"- by modifying the Technical Specifications to show the new location 3R Amendment revised the Technical Specification value of the fuel handling for one of the backup seismic monitors. Specifications. I Federal Register / VoL 54, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 30. 1989 / Notices lfii6 Late of initial notice in Federal Instrumentation,"and by adding two Norther States Power Compaq, Regan:January 11,1059(54 FR 1022) valves in TS 314442.'Mont Operated Docket Sella Merisl0 Nude The January 5.!ties euubarhta'provided Valves Thermal Overload Protection" Generating Plant,We Cattily, additional clarifying information and did These TS changes are made to allow the Mlnne.ota not change the(hiding of the initial use,during cold shutdown and rduelibg, notice. of an alternate decay heat removal Lass 1.end October rion ie.19 rafm°ne The Commission's related evaluation system(ADHRS)to be installed during Match ss.and October 10.1600 of the amendment is contained in a the third refueling outage.In addition. Brief description of amendment:This Safety Evaluation dated March 27.1989. footnotes are added tom 7.4.0.2 75 amendment melees the plant Technical No significant hands consideration anal and TS 3 .112 to limn the use of SpeCiflcations to reflect Ere protection comments received:No. the ADHRS to the third refueling outage. eyatem change.made during the 1900 Local PublicDocument Room refueling outage.and to reduce the location:University of New Orleans Data of dote:M March 27,l989 number of operating shift members library.Louisiana Collection.Lakefront. Effective date:Much 27.19811 required for safe shutdown of the New Orleans,Louisiana 70122. Amendment Na 59 reactor from outside the control room Mlsslsrtppl Power h Light Company, Facility Operating License No.NPF- for fire protection purposes.The System Energy Inc,South 29.This amendment revises the changes related to fin protection system Mississippi�Electric Power Association. Technical Specifications modification and/or addition involve Docket No.50-rt6,Grand Gulf Nuclear Date of initial notice in Federal (1)the installation of an Alternate Station.Unit 1,Claiborne County, Register:February 1.1989(54 FR 5160) Shutdown Panel outside the control Mississippi The licensee's losers dated February 8 room:(2)the addition of a feedwater and 23,and Marcy 8 and 6,199 pump hatch sprinkler curtain to the fire Date of application for amendment December 0.ilca,as supplemented provided supplemental information protection sprinkler system(3)changes December 30.1980 and January 31.1989. which did not affect the initial in requirements for penetration fire Brief description of amendment:The determination of no significant hazards barrier operability for protecting safe changes the Technical considerations The Commission's shutdown mitipment daring refueling amendment Specifications(IS)as required to related evaluation of the amendment is outages and(4)installation of support the fuel reload for Cycle 4. contained it a Safety Evaluation dated additional fire detection and protection Changes are made to the Bases for No significant hazards consideration equipment in the reactor building. Section 2.1."Safety Limits."the TS and comments received:No Dote of issuance:March 20.1989 Bases for Section 3/4.2,"Power Local Public Document Room Effective date:March 29.1989 Distribution Limits,"and TS for Section location:Herds Junior College, Amendment No.:01 5.3.1."Fuel Assemblies." McLendon Library,Raymond, Facility Operating License No.DPR- Dote of issuance::March 13.1989 Mississippi 39154 22 Amendment revises the Tednical Effective date:March 13,1989 Northeast NmdestCompany,et Speci cations. Amendment No.57 Energy e Nu Darts lnitkl notion in Faders] Facility Operating License No.NPF- al"Docket No.5�4Z1,M ll tons Nueleav °f 29.This amendment revises the Power Station,Unit No.3,New London Register May 21.1966(51 FR 16000)The County,Connecticut Commission's related mention sot the Technical Specifications. Date of initial notice in Federal Date of application for amendment amendment a contained in a Safety Register:The Commission's related PP pEvaluation dated march . January 6,1989 as supplemented by No tank hazards consideration evaluation of the Evaluation is significant contained in a Safety Evaluation dated letter dated January 20,1809' Comments received No. March 13.1989 Briefdeccripti ofometrdnrentThe Local Public_ocuavntRoom No significant hazards consideration amendment - m es Technical location:bannemcYs Public Library. comments received:Na Specifiatlan 47.10b "Snutrbera".to Technology and Science Department. Local Public Document Room allow en approximate two month 300hnolo et Mod,Minneapolis. location:Hinds Junior College, extension in the rubber Maud Minnesota 55401. Mcandon Library.Raymond. inspection interval to pent!tnnrsned Mississippi 39154 operation natal the owd refueling outage. Noithrn Stases Poser Company. Dab of issoan e:March 27.1909 Doekeb Nae.!W end 86,100,Prairie Miwlsslppi Power a Light Company' ate dater March 27.1909 Island NumberGaremg Plant Mb System Enemy Resources,Inc.,South Amendment No.:32 Hoe.1 zed 2.Goodies Canny. Mississippi Grand Plectrk PowerC � Facility Opeunting License Na NPF- Minnesota Station.Unit 1.Claiborne County, 49.Amendment revised the Technical Date of application for amendments: Mississippi Specifications July 184088 as supplemented Date of application for amendment: Date of initial notice/n Federal September 15,nee and March 10.1989. September 23.1988,as revised Register:February 41900(54 FR 6201) Brief dascrr*tion of catendmenter The November 30,December 10 and The Commission's related evaluation of acneerdmente delete the epedOcatione December 21,1986 and,as supplemented the amendment la contained in a Wet/ 2.3A.3(c)and table 18 34-2 item Za February 6.February 23,March 6 and Evaluation dated March 27,1980 dealing with the reactor trip setpoint March II 198k No significant hazards consideration tit 10 v steam for sale Brief description of amendment:The comments receive&No. level a ecluaion c seem/feedwatet amendment changes the Technical Lora!Pablle Document Room mismatch Row and low 4eedav°ese flow. Specifications by adding•plant lacotiore Waterford Public Library.49 Dote of issuance:April 3,1909 service water radiation monitor in TS 3/ Rope Perry Road.Waterford. Effective doer April 3,190 4.3.7.1,"Radiation Monitartng Connecticut 00365. Amendment Nos.:e7 and IV I • El 15848 Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19, 1989 / Notices Facility Operating Licenses Na Date of initial notice in Federal The Commission's related evaluation of DPR-t2 and DPR-eR Amendment Register:December 30,1988(53 FR the amendment is contained in a Safety revised the Technical Specifications. 53097).The Commission's related Evaluation dated April 4.1989. Dote of initial notice in Federal evaluation of the amendment is No significant hazards consideration Register February 8.1999(54 FR 6201) contained it a Safety Evaluation dated comments received-No. Since the date of the initial notice,the March 24,1989 Local Public Document Room • licensee provided supplemental No significant hazards consideration location:Rochester Public Library.115 information.This information clarified comments received••No South Avenue.Rochester.New'York the original submittal and had no impact Local Public Document Room 14810. on the original no significant hazards location:Pennsville Public Library.190 consideration determination,and S.Broadway Pennsvll Sacramento Munidpal le,New jerseyUtility District. therefore did not warrant renoticing. 3'3070 Docket No.80.332,Rancho Seco Nuclear nerating The Commission's related evaluation Public Service tactic 8+Gee Company. Ccalare s Station,Sacramento County. of the amendment is contained in a Docket No.50,354,Hope Cheek Safety Evaluation dated April 3.1989. Generating Station.Salem County.New Date of application for amendment No significant hozords consideration Jay December 30.1968.as supplemented comments received:No. March 8,1960 Local Public Document Room Date of application for amendment, Brief description of amendment The location:Minneapolis Public Library, September 23.1988 amendment authorized a one-time Technology and Science Department Brief description of amendment extension for certain local leakage rate 300 Nicollet Mall.Minneapolis, Increased the setpoints of the main p steam line radiation monitors in the tests(I lion of containmentCycle Minnesota 55aoi. Technical Specifications, penetrations until the Cycle 8 refueling NRCprajact Director:Theodore R. Dote of issuance:April 3.1868 outage.This amendment also changed Quay.Acting Effective dote:April 3.1989 the surveillance period for the LLRT on Public Sent*Company of Colorado, Amendment No.23 the Decay Heat Removal suction piping. Docket No.60.267,Fort St.Wain Facility Operating License No.NPF- Dote of/adorn%March 29.1969 Nuclear Generating Station,Platteville, 57.This amendment revised the Effective dote:March 29.1989 Colorado Technical Specifications. Amendment No:102 Date of amendment request October Dote of initial notice in Federal FacilityOperatutg License No.DPR. 14,1986 Register.November 18,1988(53 FR 54:Amendment revised the Technical Brief description of amendment' 48158).The Commission's related Specifications. evaluation of the amendment is Date of initial notice in Federal Changes certain portions of Section 7, Administrative controls. contained in a Safety Evaluation dated Register. 8 3980(54 FR 6209). Date of issuance:March 31,4969 April 3.1989. The Commission's related evaluation of date:March 31.1989 No significant hazards consideration the amendment is contained in a Safety Amendment EffectiveNo,:89 comments received:No Evaluation dated March 29,toes FacilityOperating.:6 License No.DPR- Local Public Document Room No significant hazards consideration 34.Amendment n i th Technical location:Penasville Public Library,190 comments received.•No Specifications. S.Broadway.Petmaville.New jersey Local Public Document Room Dote of initial notice in Federal OBOJO IocnUon:Martin Luther King Regional Register.November 16..1988(53 FR Rochester Gas acid Electric Corporation, Library.7340 24th Street Bypass 48155).The Commission's related Docket No.30.244,R.E.Ginna Nuclear Sacramento,California 95872 evaluation of the amendment is Fewer Plant Wayne County,New York Tennessee Valley Autbodty,Docket contained in a Safety Evaluation dated Date of application for amendment Nos.98,92'1 and 50.928,Sequoyeh March 31,1989. March 10,1967 as supplemented on Nuclear Plant Units 3 and 2,Hamilton No significant hazards consideration January 28,3988,August 26.1988 and County.Tennessee comments received.:No. January 17.1969.The licensee submittals Date of application Local Public Document Room of August 26,1988 and January 17,1989 6 (T for 8&amendments: 9) location:Greeley Public Library.City contained only minor corrections to the DecemberBrief de c ipt 8�ofS amendments: m n Complex Building,Greeley.Colorado original submittal.It was,therefore description he Seq ah The Generating Station,Salem County,New determined unnecessary to renotice the came ants m Jersey application. Nuclear Punt.Units 1 and 2 Technical Brief description of amendment:This Specifications.The changes delete surveillance requirement(SR)44.3.2.3 Dote of application for amendment amendment changes Technical November 28.1968 Specifications to comply with for the pressurizer power-operated relief Vs) ass tedBrief description of amendment requirements of Generic Letter 65-09 for valves( is SR and not required block Revised Technical Specifications operation and testing of the reactor trip valves.This SR was not required and it Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.12.E by breakers. duplicated other SR on these valves. updating the ASTM standard referenced Dote of Issuance:April 4.1989 Date of issuance:March 9.1960 in the specification for diesel fuel oil Effective date:30 days hem date of Effective dote.:March 9.1980 sampling. issuance Amendment Nos.:105,94 Date of issuance:March 24,2989 Amendment No:34 ' Facility,Operating Licensee Nos. Effective date:March 24,1989 Facility Operating License No.DPR- DPR-77 and DPR-7a Amendments Amendment No.22 18:Amendment revised the Technical revised the Technical Specifications. Facility Operating License No.NPF- Specifications. Dote of initial notice In Federal 57.This amendment revised the Date of initial notice in Federal Register.January 11,1980(54 FR 2025). Technical Specifications, Register.March 23.1988(53 FR 9513). The Commission's related evaluation of • r Federal Register / VoL 54, No. 74 / Wednesday. April 19. 1989 / Notices 15147 the amendment Is contained in a Safety test of the containment ventilation Tennessee Valley AdFniq.Docket Evaluation dated March 0.1989, isolation function when initialed bye Nos.50427 and 0a Sec myeb No significant hazards consideration high containment pressure s'tgtral or a Nudism Pleat,Una 1 and 2,Hamilton comments received:No low pressurizer pressure sigmal. County.Teases • Local Public Document Room Date of lawonca•March 13.1989 location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County visors dote:March 13.1989 Ante of application forameadmenta Library.1002 Broad Street Chattanooga. January J1.19s617$8913)as Clarified Tennessee 37402 Amendment Noe.:108 90 by letter dated Markle! 19,9 Tennessee Valley Authority,Docket No. Facility Operating Licenses Nos. Brief description of amendments:The Tennessee sSequoyah Nudes:Plant Uett 5, DPR-77 and DPR-7R Amendments amendments modify Section 3.13. 5048. n County,Tennessee lles: revised the Technical Specifications. Movable Control Assemblies.of the Date of application for amendment Date of initial notice in Federal SpSeecifications ab.Units 1 and Technical l December 2.1989(TS 88.33) Aare O.190a(53 FR 30145)• the limiting changes revise r*Pennon Brief description of amendment This The Commission's contained i in evaluation Safety (LCO)313.4 and 3.9.5 end the Figure amendment modifies the the amendment is , in a Safety Sequoyah Evaluation dated March 13,29891 3.1-1 to define the fully withdrawn Nuclear Plant.Technical Specifladon, condition for shutdown and control rod No significant hazards consideration (TS).The changes(1)revise the upper received Na banks as a position within l comments steps steps switch setpo(nt and tolerances of Local Public Document Room withdrawn and of equal to or less than surveillance requirement(SR)4.5.12.c.1 locotiorc Chattanooga-Hamilton County 231 steps withdrawn.A section is added and(2)reduce the heat flux hot channel Library,1001 Broad Street Chattanooga, to the Bases of the TS to defloe the fully factor(FQ(z))of limiting condition for Tennessee 37402. withdrawn aae,:ition for the shutdown operation(LCO)32.2 and SR 4.2.22 Tennessee Valley Authority,Docket and control rod banks.The from 2,97 to 2.15.The limit shall be 2.13 Noe,d6327 and 50.34 gequoyah supplemental information supplied in instead of 2237 until an analysis in Nuclear Plant Units]and 2,Hemline the March 0.1989 letter did not change conformance with 10 CFR 50.44 using county,Teeeee the substance of the Notice of Plant operating conditions and showing nao Consideration of an amendment the that a limit of 2.237 satisfies the Dote of application for amendments: staff issued In the Federal Register on requirements of 10 CFR 50.48(b),has Apri1]7,1987(TS 87.06) January 2O.1900 on TVA's application been completed and submitted to NRC. Brief description of amendments: for TS 89.15. This reduction in PQ(z)is a requirement These amendments amend the Date of issuance:March 2&1989 of the Exemption from 10 CFR 511.48(,)(1) Sequoyeh Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Effective dote:Match 28.1989 for operating Cycle 4 which was Issued Technical Specifications(TS)to revise Amendment Nos.:.108.98 for Unit 2 on January 20,1989.Similar parts of Section 5.0,Administrative Facility Operating Licenses Noe. amendments were approved for Unit]. Controls,of the Appendix B DPR-77 and DPR-79.Amendments in the staff letters dated October M. Environmental Technical Specifications. revised the Technical Specifications. 1968 and January 23.109. The changes(1)reflect the new title for Date of initial notice in Federal Dote of issuance.March 10.1988 the station superintendent and assign Register.February 22.1999(54 FR 7845). Effective dote:Much 10.1988 the responsibility for review and audit The Commission's related evaluation of Amendment No.:95 to the'licensee",instead of a specific the amendment is contained in a Safety Facility Operating Licenses No.DPR- WA organization,(2)extend the audit Evaluation dated Match ZS,1989 79,Amendments revised the Technical time interval on the environmental No s' l Specifications. rntsfecei hazards consideration Date of initial notice m Federal monitoring program from annual to once comments received me Register:December 30.1988(53 FR Per 18 months.(3)add additional Local:ChattAxvment Room 53102).The Commission's related requirements on the conduct of the audit location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County evaluation of the amendment is and maintaining the results of the audit. Library.1001 Broad Steel,Chattanooga. and(4)delete the reference to a defunct Tenant.*37402.contained in•Safety Evaluation dated March 10,1gse, section of the Code of Federal No signiJlrant hazards consideration Regulations(CFR). Teepees.*Valley Aatbortty.Docket comments received:No Date of issuance:March 15.1989 N°s end se Sequoyah Local Public Document Room Effective date:March 15,1989 Nuclear Plant.Units 1 and 2.Hamilton location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County Amendment Nat:107,97 � 'Tennessee Library,1001 Broad Street,Chattanooga. Facility Na,. Date of application for amendments: Tennessee 37402. DPR-77 and DPR-79.Amendments � M 287 as 87 9) Tennessee Valley Authority.Docket revised the Technical Specifications, Brief dasrzrpttaat of amend ienu The Nos.50427 and 50+378.Sequoyeh Dote of Initial notice in Federal discrepanciesame drmnb area eq minor Nuclear Plant Units 1 end 2,Hamilton Register.April 33.1986(53 FR 13020). in the ethnical Nuclear County.Tennessee The Commissions related evaluation of %%"M'Units i and),The sago the amendment is contained in a Safe (1). c ti ow(TS}The fha b es correct Dorme ber application for. eeledoents; Evaluation dated March 25,1909. ty (1)an action splealent of Table 351. September]4 1967(2.S 87.38) Reactce'}ip System Instatmentation. Brief description of amendments:The No significant hazards consideration for Unit 2 only;(2)the tun emeatallon amendments revise Table 3.34 comments received:No listed in Table 32-IL Fire Detection Engineered Safety Features Response Local Public Document Room instruments.for Unit 1 eel]:(3)the table Times,of the Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 locations Chattanooga-Hamilton County notation of Tableau-2.Radioactive Technical Specifications.The changes Library.1001 Broad Street,Chattanooga. Gaseous Waste fseteittoring,Sampling add requirements to the response time Tennessee 37402, and Analysis Program.foe both write • 15848 Federal Register / Vol. $4, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1989 / Notices and(4)the surveillance requirements interpretations.hi its letter dated Vermont Yankee Nuclear Pon 4.&1.1,2.x.4(both units)and 4.8.1.1.24.7 October 18,1988,the licensee stated that Corporation,Docket No.tp137a, (Unit I only)for diesel generators.These it would not pursue this issue further. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, changes are for both units or for only Date of issuance:April 3.1988 Vernon,Vermont Unit 1 or Unit 2 as described above. These TS changes are to correct Effective date:April 3.1980 Date of application for amendment: inconsistencies between TS Amendment Nos.:110,100 August 28;1988 requirements and to provide Facility Operating Licenses Not, Brief Description of amendment The clarification of the intent of various TS DPR•77 and DAR-7&Amendments amendment changes Technical specifications.None of the changes revised the Technical Specifications. Specifications to reflect analog diminishes safety or increases the Date of inidol notice in Federal equipment replacement probability of an accident in any area of Register:August 27.1988(51 FR 30582)• Date of issuance:March 29.1989. the plant. The Commission's related evaluation of Effective date:30 days from date of Date of issuance:April 3.1989 the amendment is contained in a Safety issuance. Effective date:April 3.1989 Evaluation dated April 3.1989 Amendment No.:110 Amendment Nos,:109.99 No significant hazards consideration Facility Operating License No.DPR- Facility Operating Licenses Nos. comments�i�,No 2&Amendment revised the Technical DPR•n and DER-79.Amendments Local Public Document Room Specifications. revised the hi Technical echnotice o Specifications.Federal location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County Date of initial notice in Federal RegisR ary.1001 Broad Street.Chattanooga. 41870).TNhe Commission's ommis io9, '1s related e FR Register December 18,1987(52 FR Tennessee 37402 0Og 41870).The Cmnmfs end 47791),The Commission's related evaluation of the amendment is evaluation of the amendment is Tennessee Valley Authority,Docket contained in a Safety Evaluation dated contained in a Safety Evaluation dated Not 69327 and 50328,Sequoyab March 29.1989. April 3,2989 Nuclear Plant,Units 1 and 2.Hamilton No significant hazards consideration No significant hazards consideration County,Tennessee comments received.•No. comments received.No Local Public Document Room location:l?Lelia C.hatta og Document RoomHamilton County Date of application for r amendments: location:Brooks memorial Library.224 �, December 2.1988 Main Street.Brattleboro,Vermont 05301• Library,1001 Broad Street.Chattanooga. Brief description of amendments:The Tennessee 37402. amendments modify the Sequoyah Virginia Electric and Power Company, Tennessee Valley Authority. Nuclear Plant,Units 1 and 2 Technical Docket Ness 30490 end 60.281,Surry Not essee and 50Aut Sequoyah Docket h Specification.The changes revise the Power Station,Unit Noe.1 and 2,Seery Nuclear t5027 5 Units i and 2,Hamilton action statements of limiting condition County.Virginia. County,Tennessee for operation 3.4.32 2 for the pressurizer Date of application for amendments: powenoperated relief valves(PORVe) June 10.1988 Date of application for amendments: and their associated block valves.The Brief description of amendments:The August 8,1980(TS 72) changes will require different actions amendments deleted the requirements Brief description of amendments: based oa the cause of valve for and references to the Control Room These amendments revise the inoperability.With one or more PORVs Chlorine Monitoring System to reflect surveillance requirements(SR)for the inoperable but capable of reactor the removal from the site of all chlorine electrical equipment protective devices coolant system(RCS)pressure control, gas storage bottles. in the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant,Units 1 power operation may continue,provided Dote of issuance:April 7,1989 and 2 Technical Specification('15).The the associated block valve is closed Effective dote:April 7,1989 changes specific pr)ocedurte the references es res in SR .8,3.1.ato (Power does not have to be removed 1. from the closed block valve). ith one Amendment ity0peNos.:tin and 124 4.8.3,1.a.2,4.8.3.1.a.3,and 4.8.3.1.b.(2) or more PORVs or block vaves Facility -3Z'Amendments License Nan.DPR- incorporate a footnote into SR 4.8.3.1.a.3 inoperable and incapable of RCS Technical DPRpec revised the which allowed this SR to be suspended pressure control,reactor shutdown will T Dote of Spial notice i and(3)delete a resistance measurement be requi ed. Date oJul y 1 .18(in R 253 test for fuses from SR 443.1.8.3.TheReCogister July 1 related aed evaluationti of.The other proposed changes in the fe of esso April April 3. 1989 amendment is containediaSafety tythe application for SR 4.8.3.1.a2 and Effective dote: 3,1989 Evaluation menamends in a Safety 4.8.3.1.a.3 to delete testing of the Amendment Nes.:211.101 dated April 7,1909. No significant Instantaneouselementaof the molded Facility Operating Licenses Nos, Jrcon!hazardsconsidorotion case circuit breakers were denied in the CPR-nand DPR-79.Amendments comments received No etaffia letter dated November 7.1986. revised the Technical Specifications, Local Public Document Room In the licensee's responses dated Date of initial notice in Federal Willocaliam Swam Library,College of December 5 and 29.1988,to the staff's tester December 30.1988(53 FR Wrginia and Katy,Witlfamebtug denial of proposed changes to the TS on 53099).The Commission's related Virginia 23185 molded case circuit breakers,it evaluation of the amendment is Washington Public Power Supply discussed possible TS Interpretations of contained in a Safety Evaluation dated System.Docket No,30497,Nuclear the trip function testing of these to April 3.1989 Proles No.2.Bentae County. reduce the number of these breakers No significant hazards consideration Washhzitton • exposed to a potentially degrading test comments received'No Date of application for amendment: current.The licensee etated that within Loco/Public Document Room December 2,1908.as supplemented e months after restart of Sequoyah Unit location:Chattanooga-Hamilton County February 1.1989. 2,it would advise the staff of any intent Library.1001 Broad Street,Chattanooga, Brief description of amendment This to pursue this issue of TS Tennessee 37401 amendment revises technical At pw.0 Federal Register / Vol. 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19. 1903 / Notices 1SS40 specification surveillance requirement 88801 and Washburn University School not time for the Commission to publish. 4.8.1.128.7 regarding verification that of Law Library,Topeka,Kansan 88021 for public comment before issuance,its automatic diesel generator trips ate Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating usual 30-day Notice of Consideration of bypassed upon an accident signal.The Corporedon,Docket No 50-482,Wolf Issuance of Amendment and Proposed amendment precludes the need for the Creek Generating Station,Coffey No Significant Hazards Consideration Count temporary waiver of compliance with Determination and Opportunity for a the technical specifications,issued y,Kansas Hearing.For exigent circumstances,the February 2,1989. Dote of amendment request:July 6. Commission has either issued a Federal Date of issuance:March 30.1989 1998 Register notice providing opportunity for Effective dote:March 30.1989 Brief description of amendment This public comment or has used local media Amendment Na.:es amendment revised Wolf Creek to provide notice to the public in the Facility Operating License No.NPF- Generating Station(WCCS).Unit No.1. area surrounding a licensee's facility of 22:Amendment changed the Technical Technical Specification Tables 313 and the licensee's application and of the Specifications. 4.3.2.which address the Engineered Commission's proposed determination Safety Features Actuation System Date of initial notice in Federal Instrumentation.The amendment of no significant hazards consideration. Register February relate 9(54 FR 8041). removed the Mode 2 applicability The Commission has provided a The Commission's related evaluation of reasonable opportunity for the public to the amendment is contained in a Safety requirements from Table 3.3.3 comment using its best efforts to make Evaluation dated March 30.1989. Functional Unit 6.g and Table 4.3 2 available to the public means of No significant hazards consideration Functional Unit e.g "Trip of All Main communication for the public to respond comments received:No, Feedweter Pumps-Start Motor Driven quickly.and in the case of telephone Pumps". Local Public Document Room Date o Issuance:April 3.1989 comments,the comments have been location:Richland City Library.Swift Effective dote.•April 3.19 recorded or transcribed as appropriate and Northgate Streets.Richland, Amendment No.:29 and the licensee has has been informed of Washington 99352 Facility Operating License No.NPF- the public In circumstanceswhere failure to act Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating 42.Amendment revised the Technical in a timely way would have resulted for Corporation Docket No.50-462,Wolf Specifications. In ample.In or resulted. a Creek Generating Station.Coffey Date of initial notice in Federal example. r .in denting e nt or shutdown prevention of of County.Kansas Register.February 22 1989(54 FR 7648). neither resumption of operation or of The Commissions related evaluation of Dote of amendment request August increase in power output up to the 25.1988 and supplemented on July 6. the amendment 1s contained in a Safety plant's licensed power leveL the Evaluation dated April 3,1980. 1987 No significant hazards consideration Commission may not have had an Brief description of amendment The opportunity to provide for public amendment eh co eats re ived:No. anged Technical Lo Local Public Document Room comment on its no significant hazards Specification paragraphs 3,8,4.1.4.8,4.1 Location:Emporia State University. determination.In such case.the license and deleted Table 3,8.1."Containment William Allen White Library.1200 amendment has been issued without Penetration Conductor Overcurrent Commercial Street Emporia,Kansas opportunity for comment If there has Protective Devices."These changes 80801 and Washburn University School been some time for public comment but were originally requested in the August of Law Library,Topeka,Kendal 88821. lees than 30 day'.the Commission may 25,1988 submittal,However,the NRC provide an opportunity for public deferred plant specific consideration NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF comment.If comments have been pending the NRC's staff resolution of the AMENDMENT TO iIFACILITY requested,it is so stated.In either event. A issue on a genetic basis.The generic LICENSE FINAL the State has been consulted by resolution has subsequently been DETERMINATION OF NO telephone whenever possible. accomplished and was discussed in the SSIGNIFICANT HAEAJtDS IANTIO AND Under its regulations,the Commission safety evaluation of this amendment. may issue and make an amendment Date of Issuance:March n ieee OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING immediately effective.notwithstanding ' Effective dote:March 23,1989 (EXIGENT OR EMERGENCY the pendency before It of a request for a Amendment No,:28 CIRCUMSTANCES) hearing from any person.in advance of Facility Operating License No.NPF. During the period since publication of the holding and completion of any C Amendment revised the Technical the last biweekly notice,the required hearing,where it has Specifications. Commission has issued the following determined that no significant hazards Dote of initial notice in Federal amendments.The Commission has consideration is involved Register.September 24.1980(51 FR determined for each of these The Commission has applied the 33951).The July 8,1987 submittal amendments that the application for the standards of 10 CRR 50.92 and has made provided additional clarifying amendment complies with the standards a final determination that the information and did not change the and requirements of the Atomic Energy amendment involves no significant finding of the initial notice.The Act of 1954,as amended(the Act)•and hazards consideration.The basis for this Commission's related evaluation of the the Commission's riles and regulations. determination is contained in the amendment is contained in a Safety The Commission has made appropriate documents related to this action. Evaluation dated March 23,19611, findings as required by the Act and the Accordingly.the amendments have been No significant hazards consideration Commission's rules and regulations in 10 issued and made effective as indicated - comments received:No. CFR Chapter L which are set forth in the Unless otherwise indicated.the Local Public Document Room license amendment Commission has determined that these Location:Emporia State University. Because of exigent or emergency amendments satisfy the criteria for William Allen White Library,1200 circumstances associated with the date categorical exclusion in accordance Commercial Street Emporia.Kansas the amendment was needed,there was with 10 CFR 51.22.Therefore.pursuant adIMINNIMIn 15850 Federal Register / VoL 54. No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 1909 / Notices to 10 CFR u1.22(b).no environmental the proceeding and(3)the possible nailed;plant tame:and pnblketlon impact statement or environmental effect of any order which may be date and ma number of this Federal assessment need be prepared for these entered in the proceeding on the Restate notice.A copy of the petition amendments.If the Commission has petitioner's interest.The petition should should also be sent to the Cake of the prepared an environmental assessment also Identify the specific aspects)of the General Counsel,US.Nodes under the special circumstances subject matter of the proceeding as to Regulatory Commission.Washington. provision in 10 CFR 51.12(b)and has which petitioner wishes to intervene. DC 20656,and to the attorney for the made a determination based on that Any person who has filed a petition for licensee. assessment it is so indicated. leave to intervene or who has been Nontimely filings For further details with respect to the admitted as a party may amend the Burgs of petitions s for leave to inlementa amended action see(1)the application for petition without requesting leave of the Petitions supplemental not e and/or tai requests amendment,(2)the amendment to Board up to fifteen(15)days prior to the for hearing will not be entertained Facility Operating license.and(3)the first prehearing conference scheduled in absent a determination by the Commission's related letter,Safety the proceeding,but such an amended Commission.the presiding officer or the Evaluation and/or Environmental petition must satisfy the specificity Atomic Safety and Licensing Board,that Assessment,as indicated.Al!of these requirements described above. the petition and/or items are available for public inspection Not later than fifteen(15)days prior to request should be at the Commission's Public Document the first prehearing conference factors tct based upon a balancing of the Room,the Colman Building,2120 L scheduled in the ( rs 2pecified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(iJ(i} Street NW..Washington. pront to the petition peti to (y)and 2714(d). DC,and at the shall file a supplement to to local public document room for the intervene which must include a list of Arkansas Power A Light Company, particular facility involved. the contentions which are sought to be Docket No.50713,Arkansas Nuclear A copy of items(2)and(3)may be litigated in the matter,and the bases for One,Unit 1(ANO-1).Pope County. obtained upon request addressed to the each contention set forth with Arkansas U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission, reasonable specificity.Contentions shall Washington,DC 20555.Attention; be limited to matters within the scope of Dote of amendment request March 23. Director.Division of Reactor Projects. the amendment under consideration.A 1969 The Commission is also offering an petitioner who fails to file such a Brief description of amendment This opportunity for a hearing with respect to supplement which satisfies these amendment authorized the steady state the issuance of the amendments.By requirements with respect to at tenet one power level for ANO-i not to exceed May 19.1969,the licensee may file a contention will not be permitted to 1284 megawatts thermal for a period not request for a hearing with respect to participate as a party. to exceed 50 effective full power days. issuance of the amendment to the Those permitted to intervene become This limitation in power level was subject facility operating license and parties to the proceeding,subject to any required due to identification of a any person whose interest may be limitations in the order granting leave to previously unanalyzed loss of coolant affected by this proceeding and who intervene,and have the opporhmity to accident(COCA). wishes to participate as a party in the participate fully in the conduct of the Date of issuance:March 29.1989 proceeding must file a written petition hearing,including the opportunity to Effective dote:March 29.1989 for leave to intervene.Requests for a present evidence and cross-examine Amendment No.:119 hearing and petitions for leave to witnesses, Facility Operating License No.DPR- intervene shall be filed in accordance Since the Commission has made a 51.Amendment revised the operating with the Commission's"Rules of final determination that the amendment license. Practice for Domestic Licensing involves no significant hazards Proceedings"in 10 CFR Part 2.1f a consideration,if a hearing is requested o pore comments requested on,to request for a hearing or petition for it will not stay the effectiveness of the cropose tro NO. rt o mis leave to intervene is filed by the above amendment Any hearing held would consideration:—evevaluation Nn,The the Commission's n t, date.the Commission or an Atomic take place while the amendment is in related ofeme g n cofy amendment. Safety and Licensing Board,designated effect, finding nald emergency no si circumstances and by the Commission or by the Chairman A request for a hearing or a petition final determlrratiao of no gnificant of the Atomic Safety and Licensing for leave to intervene must be filed with hazards Safety Evaluation dated are Marchma. in Board Panel.will rule on the request the Secretary of the Commission,U.S. a Safety Evaluation March 29. and/or petition and the Secretary or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1950. designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington,DC 20655,Attention: Attorney for licensee:Nicholas S. Board will testae a notice of hearing or Docketing and Service Breech or may Reynolds,Esq.Bishop.Cook.Purcell and an appropriate order, be delivered to the Commission's Public Reynolds,1400 L Street'NW., A,required by 10 GFR 2,724,a Document Room,the Gelman Building. Washfngtoa.DC 20006-33o2 nt Room petition with particularity the interest of the above date.Where tpetitions are by location:. omlinson LiLocal Public ebrary,Arkansas i the petitioner in the proceeding and how filed during the last ten(10)days of the Tech University.Russellville.Arkansas 'i that interest may be affected by the notice period,it is requested that the 72801 resul's of the proceeding.The petition petitioner promptly so inform the MMCProject Director.Jose A.Calve should specifically explain the reasons Commission by a toll-free telephone call Dated at Rockvlle.Maryland.this 13th day why i'r rvention should be permitted to Western Union at 14800)3230000(in of April.19M with;articular reference to the Missouri 1-(500)3424700).The Western For the Nuclear Regulatory Cammhsioa following factors:(1)the nature of the Union operator should be given Stevan A.Varga, petidoner's right under the Act to be Dategam Identification Number 3737 Director.Division ofReacterPhr/ectn-ell. mate a party to the proceeding:(2)the and the following message addressed to O11'/ceonsticiserxeocw,Regubo'o r nature and extent of the petitioner's (Project Director):petitioner's name and (Dec.8P9R09 plied 418489 4:45 am) properly,financial.or other interest in telephone number,date petition was sauasOne rnse,e a ., , r, . STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS - DIVISION OF HOUSING ��* 1 John T. Maldonado, Director / y0 , '\,:d' Roy Romer Governor May 5, 1989 The Honorable C. W. Kirby Chairman Weld County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 1805 Greeley, 00 80632 Dear Commissioner Kirby: It is my pleasure to offer a Contract for a grant in the amount of $20,000.00 to Weld County for emergency shelter operations through the Greeley Transitional House and the Guadalupe Center To initiate contracting procedures, please contact Daniel Lopez at 866-2033. As you know, no funds are obligated by the State until a Grant Contract has been executed. No expenses incurred before the Contract is fully executed by all parties will be reimbursed by the State. We wish you every success in the continuation of your program. Please let us know if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, `'^'' / '4" ,1,�e m T. Maldo o Director cc: Walter Speckman Bonnie Kugler Pile /mr/1-001 - �j` �,, ' ``x '1313 Sherman Street, 623 Centennial Building, Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-2033 OF'co<o Cyy TIMOTHY M.01 BRIEN.C.P.A. _ take STATE OF COLORADO State Auditor iite„deOFFICE OF STATE AUDITOR 200 21 East 14th Services(303)888.2057 Denver, COI0radd 80203 '876 r April 24, 1989 Board of County Commissioners - Weld County P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Due to time and personnel constraints, we have found it necessary to cut short our reviews of the 1987 audit reports. Since we were not able to get to your 1987 report, we will review it in conjunction with your report for the year ended December 31, 1988. If you or your auditor have any questions regarding your 1987 report, please feel free to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Holly Bostick, CPA Director of Local Government Audits HB:on • i I I r I Hello