The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About850118.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN - TWOMBLY RANCH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 26th day of June, 1985 , at the hour of 2 :00 p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the Final Planned Unit Development Plan submitted by Twombly Ranch, c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 , and WHEREAS, said Final Plan concerns the following described real estate , to-wit: Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioner heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this Final Plan shall be approved for the following reasons: 1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 28 .5 .3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The request is in conformance with Section 28 . 4 . 2 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. On November 21 , 1984 , the Board of County Commissioners approved the subject Planned Unit Development District because the application did meet the required criteria of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. b. The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms to the Planned Unit Development District in which it is proposed to be located. c. The uses, buildings , and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future d5011 8 Page 2 RE: FINAL PUD PLAN - TWOMBLY FARMS development as projected by the comprehensive plans of affected municipalities. The Town of Hudson reviewed this request and recommends approval in a letter dated April 24 , 1985 . d. The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms with the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35 . 3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, subject to conditions as listed below. e. The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms with Section 53 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the Flood Hazard Overlay District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Final Planned Unit Development Plan on the herinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, approved subject to the following condition: 1 . The Final Planned Unit Development plat shall be amended to show a fifteen foot (15 ' ) perimeter utility easement. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 26th day of June, A.D. , 1985 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ag(CQ/4 CNC WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder (NAY) and Clerk to the Board J riollit=tirman EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING (AYE) BY: Gene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem eputy County C erk (AYE) APPR VED "TO FORM: C.W.1Ktirb ��t('��,� (AYE) C ->c G41\61 ( L County Attorney CC'/,/7 "aril' (NAY) Frank am (uchi f/ HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 85-32 RE: FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN - TWOMBLY RANCH A public hearing was conducted on June 26, 1985, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Chairman Commissioner Gene Brantner, Pro-Tem Commissioner C.W. Kirby Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated May 20, 1985, and duly published May 23, 1985, in the Johnstown Breeze, a public hearing was conducted to consider the Final Planned Unit Development Plan submitted by Twombly Ranch. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Rod Allison, Planning Department representative, read the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Jim Erger came forward to represent Twombly Ranch and answer questions of the Board. Russell Hayes and Robert Swank, neighbors, came forward to express opposition to this Planned Unit Development Plan. Robert Bullard, president of the Hudson Fire Protection District, stated that the District has no problems with the proposal and feels they can adequately provide fire protection for this Planned Unit Development. Considerable discussion was held concerning the availability of water and the traffic impact. (Tape Change #85-53) Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the Final Planned Unit Tevelopment Plan submitted by Twombly Ranch, based upon the recommendations of the Planning Commission. He also stated that he felt this will not impact the County Road system since no additional roads will be involved and will not create a problem by converting this land to residential since this is not considered prime agricultural land. Commissioner Lacy also commented that the approval of this Final P.U.D. Plan will not increase the tax income for Weld County. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion and stated that he had concerns about the impact this will make on the County Road system. After further comments, the motion carried on a roll call vote with Commissioners Brantner, Lacy, and Kirby voting aye and Commissioner Yamaguchi and Chairman Johnson voting nay. APPROVED: nn t • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: \Pilaw l2/tnAA, "P.(.c/rtd t2[,v WELD COUNTY, COLORADO U • \ Weld County Clerk and Recorder _ and Clerk to the Boar J cque ne Joh s n, Chairman (-BY: EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING puty County Cle Gene R. Brantner, Pro-Tem —4,2426a_er --- C.W. Go Frank Yamag hi cer- ,TAPE #85-52 & 85-53 DOCKET #85-32 LHR 2217 ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY ' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : JUNE 26, 1985 -DOCKET #85-28 - APPORTIONMENT FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #84-1 DOCKET # 85-29L - TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, LEROY SATHER DBA STREAMERS DOCKET # 85-27 - COZ, A TO C-3, NORTHWEST LAND COMPANY -DOCKET # 85-40 - AMEND USR, EGG PRODUCTION COMPLEX, MORNING FRESH FARMS DOCKET # 85-32 - P.U.D. FINAL PLAN, TWOMBLY RANCH _'LEASE write or print legibly your name , address and the DOC # (as '__ tad above) or the aaolicants name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING /Nile47/ 1/ AZ, Vd s 6i/+aD 07OY Y,- .4,-',a d 040 F.S -vo 7% e _[ao-d 3rx'0 47 .5-7 4eAQ--$. b'S 3 -S - l la Lk "- c.--,t (N`�- itte7 1,32 u , 1. exI- Der1Udii `&'2C-( 5'5- 27 pit 4. 6 p _elut- Jr (nit] 7 4_7- Rd 2/ Xec-41,--S Ac i-49 _21")5 ' 7 (/k--y�� 1�lJ �L I eGti,.v1.S,c ��i l.Q n � 9J-- 3 'Z, 1 0 77 r� e � JcS"c ! ►ai CiC;T( /r 13v / %Y, � - 31_ 4 ti, 73,�Le4 76) A.a( n , 5--73 ? &I ,6 /f7,721 kV c,. 3 tie -- 5 R'.S---.51a /sitkil Pnikait ?S V O 1O 7 A of *301 R c- Li �?+.! K O/4, X30.; 60 c." --/,1/vt�'ik 1,.� iK -�� gJ -- 29/-- - i u-v . /d975,--) C S IN4/O/: c,iC q_kc7i r /(1.5( f 57r51"‘ NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Uolorado, Weld 0nunty Centenni-al Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, 0reeley, Colorado, -at the _time specified. All persons in any manner interested -in the following proposed Final Planned Unit Development Plan are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a certified court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the heating, the -Clerk to the Board's Office can be contacted for a list of certified court _reporters in the area. If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be -advised of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of -engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 85-32 Twombly Ranch c/o James Erger 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 DATE: June 26, 1985 TIME: 2:00 P.M. REQUEST: Final Planned Unit -Development Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN -COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO _T-HE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: May 20, 1985 PUBLISHED: May 23, 1985, in the Johnstown Breeze EXH/$/T C� NOTICE Pursuant to the_zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld Bounty, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th AFFIDAVIT_OF PLBLICATION Street, First Tloor, Greeley, Colorado,-at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Final Planned mt T-HE JOHNSTOWN BREEZ-E DevelopmentPlan are requested to attend and may be heard.* STATE OF COLORADO l SS Should the applicant or any interested _party desire the COUNTY OF WELD presence of a xertlfied court reporter to make a record of.the 1, Clyde Briggs, do solemnlyswear that I -proceedings, in addition to the am publisher of-The _Johnstown Breeze; taped record which will be kept during..the hearing, the Clerk,to that the same is a weekly newspaper the Board's Office can be con- tacted for a list of.certified court printed, in whole or in part, and published reporters in the area If a court in the County of Weld, -State of Colorado, reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be and has ageneral_circulation therein; that advised of such action at least er said newspaper has been published five days prior to the hearing.The P P cost of engaging a court reporter continuously and uninterruptedly in said shall be borne by the requesting party. County of Weld for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the BE IT-ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the first publication of the annexed legal notice Weld County Planning Con? oradvertisement; that said newspaper has mission may be examined in the office of the-Clerk to thel3oard of been-admitted to the United States mails as in the County Centennial te C nt Weldommios inon s, locnd second-class matter under the rovisions of P Center, 915 10th Street,Third. the Act of March 3, 1879, or any Floor, Greeley, Colorado. amendments thereof, and that said DOCKET NO. 85-32 newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly APPLICANT qualified for publishing legal notices and Twombly c/o Jame Ranch s Erger advertisements within the meaning of the 7290 Magnolia Street laws of the State of Colorado. Commerce City, Colorado 80022 That the annexed legal notice or advertise- DATE: June 26, 1985 ment was published in the regular and TIME: 2:00' P.M. entire issue of Every number of said weekly REQUEST: Final Planned Unitnewspaper for the period of ...1. consecu- Development Plan tive insertions; and that the first LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section publication of said notice was in the issue of 7, Township 1 North, Range 64 said newspaper datedS=Z3 A.D. 19...., West , the 6th P.M., Web and that the last publication of said notice County, Colorado was in the issue of said newspaper dated - BOARD OF-COUNTY , AD. 19 COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, In witness whereof I have hereunto set COLORADO my hand this _1.7 day of Oct BY: MARY ANN A.D. 192. FEUERSTEIN. -COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD... BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy , ,,, Publisher DATED: May 20,.,1985 the PUBLISHED: May S3Breeze 1856, in Subscribed and sworn to before me, a P1s ISHED: Notary Public in and for the C,ounty of War, to of Colorado, this ,/ ..... day of �//. a AD. 19.4f'- / l 2,4 l:,nitry yblic. c...., _.. . . My cdinif°iiisslbri-' xplres`1 DATE: May 20 , 19B5 TO: The -Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the -Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, -we -have tentatively set the following hearing for the 2-6th day of June, 1985 , at 2 : 0D P.M. Docket No. 85-32 - Twombly Ranch, Final Planned Unit Development Plan OFFICE OF THE LE TO THE BOARD BY: Z Win,,,/ Deputy J The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO / �� / / go a� " ,G SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 7, 19B5 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on May 7, 19B5, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld. County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The -meeting was called to order by the chairman, Bob Ehrlich, at 1:30 p.m. Tape 201 - Side 1 ROLL CALL Lydia Dunbar Present Doug Graff Absent - Called in Paulette Weaver Present Stephen Hamilton Absent - Called in Bill McMurray Absent - Called in Louis Rademacher Absent — Called ±n Jack Holman Present Sharon Z inhart Present Bnb Thrlich Present Also present: Rod Allison, -Current Planner II, Gloria -Dunn, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary. A quorum was -present. The summary of the last -regular meeting -of the Weld County Planning Commission held on April 19, 1985, were approved as distributed following a correction on -Page 7, paragraph 5, Line 14--Changing the word precident to pre edent. CASE NUMBER: S-243:85:2 APPLICANT: Twombly -Ranch REQUEST: Final Planned Unit Development Plan LEGAL DESC-RIPTION: Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.-M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2 -miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 & east of Weld County Road 49. APPEARANCE: James Erker -represented the applicants. This is a full section of land which -will be divided into thirteen lots. This will be a tanchette type subdivision. There is subirrigated pasture with each lot. The Utility Board requested -a fifteen foot _perimeter utility easement and this has been put on the plat. The easement will be in the name of the -Homeowner's Association. The blue shaded area, Lots one through eight, are in s flood plain area. EXNi B/T Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 1985 Page 2 Lee Morrison reported the Planning Commission will have to look at this as it is presented along with the applicant's ability to conform with the performance standards. Rod Allison read Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance relating to Performance Standards. Jerry McRae, P.E. , McRae and Short, Inc. , reported on the studies he had done on this Planned Unit Development and recommendations for building sites that will be within the flood plain. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. Neil Peters, Attorney, Amoco, reported it is there understanding oil and gas production will be allowed within this subdivision. Tape 201 - Side 2 Rod Allison reported that oil and gas production was a use by right in the subject Planned Unit Development area. The Chairman asked Mr. Erker if he had reviewed the recommendations and conditions as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff. He stated he had, and has no objections to anything outlined. The Chairman asked that reading of the recommendations and conditions, as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff, be dispensed with and that they be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings. Rod Allison agreed as long as everyone was aware that this request is for a final Planned Unit Development Plan for residential (R-1) and agricultural uses. This was not spelled out clearly on the request. MOTION: ,lack Holman moved Case Number S-245:85:2 for the Twombly Ranch be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the testimony heard by the Planning Commission and the recommendations and conditions as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 1985 Page 3 The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. 'The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Lydia Dunbar - yes; Paulette Weaver - No, her interpretation of the P.U.D. standards for open-space differ from Rod's interpretation of Section 35.3 of the Comprehensive Plan. She also sees a potential for future use in the area based on Section 28.3.2. 1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan. Jack Holman - yes; Sharon Linhart - yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes. Motion carried with four voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. CASE NUMBER: L'SR-674:85: 13 APPLICANT: John R. Reinholdt REQUEST: Use by Special Review Permit for an oil and gas pipeline business LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W' , Section 33, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 1 mile east of Erie; north of State Highway 7 and east of Weld County Road 5. APPEARANCE: Ray Mulholland represented the applicant. They want to established this piece of land as a base of operations for a pipeline construction business. They would have their corporate office, maintenance, storage and a workshop area on the Use by Special Review area. This would also include the storage of construction equipment on a temporary basis. They own eighty acres, but only sixteen acres will be used for the Use by Special Review area. There are some commercial uses in the area, but they are not asking for a change of zone. They will employ twenty to twenty-five people on a full-time basis. The Chairman asked if they had reviewed the recommendations, conditions, and operation standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff. He stated they have and there has been an access onto Highway 7 for many years for agricultural purposes. They would like to use this for a vehicle access, but would not use it for truck access. -They would also rather have a tree line than a wooden fence to screen the area. Rod Allison stated the staff is in agreement with the applicant that a six foot high wooden fence will not adequately screen the facility from Highway 7. The staff is in agreement that a tree line would be more attractive and screen the property better. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. B'E„J r 7Y "..,."r' .,..,e n;1 ` i ) I .1 � .- n{j MAY 1 01985 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMIS 5(Y-4— na - u OREELEY. COLO. RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CASE NUMBER: S-245:85:2 NAME: Twombly Ranch ADDRESS: c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 REQUEST: Final Planned Unit Development Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two (2) miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 28.5.3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.3.2 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. On November 21, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners approved the subject Planned Unit Development District because the application did meet the required criteria of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms to the Planned Unit Development District in which it is proposed to be located; - The uses, buildings, and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future development as projected by the comprehensive plans of affected municipalities. The town of Hudson reviewed this request and recommends approval in a letter dated April 24, 1985; - The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms with the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, subject to conditions as listed below; and C. Xff/B/T 1 S-245:85:2 Twombly Ranch Page 2 The Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms with Section 53 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the Flood Hazard Overlay District. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request and responses of referral entities which have reviewed the request. The Planning -Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to scheduling the Final Planned Unit Development Plan before the Board of County Commissioners, the Final Planned Unit pevelopment Tlat shall be amended to show a fifteen foot (15') perimeter utility easement. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar. vote: _For Passage Against Passage _Lydia Dunbar Paulette Weaver Jack Holman Sharon Linhart Bob Ehrlich The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, -Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on May 7, 1985, and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 8th day of May, 1985 Bobbie Good Secretary EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHY= Case 7;44/11.12 742 - ZO, 4 Exhibit Buhuitted By Exhibit Description A. 449Z7 g7--7711.4-94/ feJ- z l/ Ze B. /I�r✓/J 61771/J72zaa Lo-r ii�l my �f iyycao G//yl C. �.-1-97 D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. AM 4,0 N. O. ,.. ,.; INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Numher S- 2 93•tS' L Submitted nr Prepared Prior to Hearing At Hearing 1. Application 6C( Pages X 2. / Application plat(s) / Dage(s) ikr 3. DPS Deferral Summary Sheet 4. DPS Recommendation 5. DPS Surrounding Eropery Owner Mailing List r 6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List /f 7. 3 DPS Maps _Prepared by Planning Technician /4- 8. DRS Notice of Hearing X 9. DPS Case Summary Sheet A- 10. DPS field -Check 11. /e a. 6, s of Ile /') n,r t2e7 l?,Myr 12. /r4.A, . Lac +.-er.fLirdv t�t�i trd 2 5 1 S fr 13. ///�� 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. I hereby certify that the items identified herein wer-e submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or -prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items mere forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on 19 . Current Planner STATE OF COLORY,DO ) COUNTY OF WELD SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BE-FORE ME -THIS DAY OF 19 SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EY.PIRFS_ (()F't mktd(r),1' of co< `-s�11x)4 WE-85-0005 6 A �9 'yp H O' RICHARD D. LAMM * # \\\ JOHN W BOLD GOVERNOR ' * DIRECT OR 1876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY F ` ® ;: DEPARTMENT_OF X a 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611 April 29, 1985 Mr. Michael Mullen Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, _Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: RE: TW0MBL'EY RANCH We have received and reviewed the plat, engineering geologic report by Judith Hamilton and attendant information for the proposed subdivision. Ms. Hamilton's report indicates that swelling clay soils, locally shallow groundwater and bedrock and flooding may affect development of the site. Flooding can cause property damage, loss of life and malfunction of -sewage dispos-al systems. Building pads have been recommended for construction within the flood Mein. Potential lot purchasers and the county should be aware of the hazards and added expence of building homes and utilities in a flood hazard zone. We recommend that lot lines be altered to provide construction areas outside of the flood plain. The recommendations concerning foundation construction and septic system design should be closely observed. Sincerely, Julia E. Turney Engineering -Geologist f;? V( 011985 ca:JET-85-007 Weld Co. Planning Commission GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PA-ST.. . KEY TOTHE FUTURE si4T,OF Q'earte) We pc a Maa'''4.4. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY «y,N eite- .a 2 OMAHA DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS M S m ' ' '^ 6014 U.S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE E ;K I �F * 'T 11// � OMAHA. NEBRASKA 68102 L s P ea'j.+ ,..�' AN TO ATTETTE October 16 , 19 NTIOON OF 44 Planning Division D E 5 V* E OCT 2 21984 Mr. Michael B. Mullen Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Weld Co. Planning Commission Greeley, Colorado -80631 Dear Mr. Mullen : This letter is a follow—up to our telephone conversation in September 1984. In that conversation we responded to your request for information concerning the effect on the published Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) flood boundaries on Box Elder Creek downstream from Bootleg Reservoir due to eliminatiot of flood storage in Bootleg Reservoir. The specific site is in Section 7 , T. 1 N. , R. 64 W. , in Weld County, Colorado. Tte flood boundaries for this reach of Sox Elder Creek aredesignated on the FIRM as Zone A, indicating that they are based on approximate study methods. We made a very cursory examination of the effect of Bootleg Reservoir on downstream flood boundaries. This examination considered the flood -control storage that existed in Bootleg Reservoir and the _drainage are-a upstream from Bootleg Reservoir. We feel that the storage available in Bootleg leservoir for flood control would be consumed by the ascension side of the 100-year flood hydrograph of Box Elder Creek and would not decrease the peak discharge. This conclusion plus the approximate nature of the existing -FIRM flood boundaries downstsream from Bootleg Reservoir make us feel that the flood boundaries on the FIRM would not change. More change would probably result in the FIRM flood boundaries from a -detailed hydraulic study rather than from changes in the flood control characteristics of Bootleg Reservoir. We hope that these comments are useful to you. Please keep in mind, however, that they are based on a cursory examination of existing information, not detailed studies. If you have any questions, feel free to call on us. • Sin erely, ry S. B ss Chief, Fl od Plain Management Services Branch Planning _Division 41 Date: May 7, 1985 CASE NUMBER: S-245:85:2 NAME: Twombly Ranch ADDRESS: c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, Colorado 80022 REQUEST: Final Planned Unit Development Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two (2) miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR -THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 28.5.3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.-3.2 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. On November 21, 1984, the -Board of County Commissioner-s approved the subject Planned Unit Development District because the application did meet the required criteria of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - The -Final Planned Unit Development Plan conforms to the Planned Unit Development District in which it is proposed to be located; - The uses, buildings, and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future development as projected ty the comprehensive plans of affected municipalities. The town of Hudson reviewed this request and recommends approval in a letter dated April 24, 1985; The Final Planned _Unit Development Plan conforms with the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, subject to conditions as listed below; and The Final -Planned Unit Development Plan conforms with Section 53 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the Flood Hazard Overlay District. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request and -responses of referral entities which -have reviewed the request. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendatian for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to scheduling the Final Planned Unit Development Plan before the -Board of -County Commissioners, the Final Planned Unit Development Plat shall be amended to show a fifteen loot (15') uni:1.4) perimeter easement. LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: April 30, 1985 CASE NUMBER: S-243:85:2 NAME: Twombly Ranch ADDRESS: c/o James Erger, 7290 Magnolia Street, Commerce City, CO 80022 REQUEST: Final Planned Unit Development Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7, 1'lN, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Raod 49. SIZE OF PARCEL: 640 acres POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The -criteria for review are listed in Section 28.3. 2. 1 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordnance. Please find a copy of this zoning ordinance section in your case summary packet. The Weld Lounty Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee has _recommended that a fifteen (15) foot perimeter easement be shown on the Final PUD Plan. The applicant is complying with this request. The Department of Planning Services has _received several objections to this proposal from surrounding proparty owners. C- JE EL2-8,3. 1. 1.5 That STREET or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. In il the event that the STREET or highway facilities are not properly sized and are planned to be properly sized in the future, in conformance with • the Weld County Thoroughfare Plan or in11 conformance with the MASTER PLANS of affected -municipalities, the applicant may either wait to secure the rezoning until the improvements are11 made by the appropriate unit of government or the applicant may express a willingness to upgrade the STREET or highway facilities at his own expense in order to expedite approval of the requested change -of zone. In the latter _event, it will be necessary for the applicant to either construct She necessary improvements before the buildingli permits are issued, or submit suitable performance guarantees to Weld County to ensure construction of the required STREET or highway facility improvements. 28.3. 1. 1 .6 That there has been compliance with the applicable II requirements contained in Section 21 .5. 1.5 of this Ordinance. 28.3. 1 .2 The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall 11 forward the official recommendation of the Planning Commission and the information contained in the official record, which includes the II Department of Planning Services case file, to the Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) days after said recommendation has been made. 11 28.3. 1 .3 If the Planning Commission recommendation is conditional upon the applicant completing certain specified items prior to the publication of theII notice for the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, then the ten (10) day period shall commence upon submission of the items by the applicant to the Department of Planning Services. 11 X28.3.2 PUD Plan 11 28.3.2. 1 The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider a PUD Plan application. The Planning Commission may review a PUD Plan concurrently with applications for a change of zone to a PUD District; for any -Overlay District Permit; or for e Supplemental District Regulation. If a PUD Plan is applied for concurrently with a 11 -PUD District application in which the PUD Plan As ro be located, the Planning Commission shall review the PUD District application prior to the 20-39 I PUD Plan application. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners concerning the disposition of the requested PUD Plan. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty (60) days of the I initial hearing date. The Planning Commission shall recommend approval of the request for the PUD -Plan unless tt finds that the applicant has not met one or more of the applicable requirements or conditions -of Sections 28.3.2. 1 , 28.5 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of Sections 28.3.2, 28.5 and 28. 6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: 1 28.7.2. 1 . 1 That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 28.3.2. 1.2 That the proposed PUD Plan conforms to the PUD District in which it is proposed to to Thcated. 28.3.2. 1.3 That the USES, BUILDINGS, and STRUCTURES which I would be permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future DEVELOPMENT of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with 1 the future DEVELOPMENT -as _projected by the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN or MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities. 1 28.3.2. 1 .4 That there has been conformance with the Performance Standards outlined in _Section 35.3. 1 28.3.2. 1.3 That there has been compliance with She Weld County Zoning Ordinance, Section 30, Overlay Districts if the proposal is located within any Overlay District Area identified ty -maps officially adopted by Weld County. 28.3.2. 1.6 That there has been compliance with the submittal ' requirements of the PUD Plan, and that the PUD Plat and the Supporting Documents satisfy the legitimate concerns of the Planning Commission. I 28.3.2.2 The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall forward the official recommendation of the Planning Commission and the information contained in the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, to the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners _within ten (10) jays after said recommendation has been made. I28.3.2.3 If the Planning Commission recommendation is conditional upon the applicant completing certain I 20-60 -specified items prior to the -ublication of the notice for the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, then the ten (10) day -period shall commence upon submission of the items by the applicant to the Department of Planning Services. 28.4 Duties of the Office of the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing to _consider an application for a change of zone to a PUD District or an application for a PUD Plan. The Board shall not approve any HID application without written consent of the landowners whose properties are included within the proposed PUD District. 28.4. 1 Change of Zone to a PUD District 28.4. 1. 1 Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the Office of the Board of County Commissioners shall institute the procedures contained in Section 21.6. 1 of this Ordinance. 28.4. 1 .2 The Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing to consider the application and to lake final action thereon. The Board shall make a decision on the application within sixty (60) days of the initial hearing date. In making a decision on the proposed change of zone, the Board shall consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and from the facts presented at the publi-c hearing and the information contained in �a the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, the Board of County Commissioners shall approve the request for the change of zone to a :PUD District unless it finds that the applicant has not met one or more of the applicable requirements or conditions of Sections 28.4. 1.2, 28.5 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of Sections 28.4. 1 .2, 28.5 and 28.6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: 28.4. 1.2. 1 That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 28.4. 1.2.2 That the USES which would he allowed on the subject property will conform to the Performance Standards of the PUD District contained in Section 35.3 of this Ordinance. 28.4.1.2.3 Shat the USES which would be permitted shall be compatible with the existing cr future DEVELOPMENT of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future DEVELOPMENT as projected by the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ar MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities. ?0-61 41/0 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: S-245:85:2 DATE OF INSPECTION: August 24, 1984 NAME: Twombly Ranch REQUEST: Final Planned Unit Development Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 17, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two (2) miles east of Hudson; south of State Highway 52 and east of Weld County Road 49 LAND USE: N State Highway 52, Box Elder Creek, 4 residences, mobile home, irrigated cropland (pivot) . F. Weld County Road 51, residence, Denver Hudson Canal, cropland, farm residence and mobile home. S Weld County Road 10, residence, pasture, irrigated cropland, farm residence. W Weld County Road 49, irrigated cropland, 3 residences, dairy farm, 2 farm residences to the southwest. ZONING: N Agricultural E Agricultural S Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: The subject site is an entire section (640 acres) that is proposed for thirteen (13) residential lots. Currently, the site is dryland wheat cropland and flood plain pasture. No improvements are present on the property. Twenty (20) head of cattle were estimated to be grazing, and a cattle loading area was located in the northwestern corner of the property. The western half of the section is flat and within the 100 year flood plain of Box Elder Creek. Evidence of recent flooding was apparent; grass was caught in the fence line crossing Box Elder Creek. The majority of the _flood plain is fenced for pasture. The eastern half of the section is upland terrain with a western slope. Four roads provide access to the site: State Highway 52 (paved) , Weld County Road S1 (gravel) , Weld County Road 49 (gravel) , and Weld County Road 10 (gravel) . The bridge on Weld County Road 10 has been washed out. Trash and car bodies can be found adjacent to the -damaged bridge and Box Elder Creek. Two wet spots were noticed on Weld County Road 51, and they can be attributed to seep areas. By: � . (^AuQ0, Michael S. Mullen Current Planner tr.. •o: - �• ;—y- • _ _ -• �. z.:.a te_ •. . : 1 t ll7ti e• •. ,5 :5 • I \ .• . FP ts. — •I'• a•.I. OFLCREST•p,' 211 .`'3: , _` .. ao • : fl `k• ,. p • r n • • ...z32 ` •. MI I • • • • I 17,7 �, • • II • • o yr - ----- 71. . • > 1 2 5 • 5 I . 4.p •1/- i • /� • 'i I •� p%fir r o u n n I ill TIC •• 4 ,Q L<TreviLLE :t Lu' n xl 1 x. n .• ozi 4 F• v r. ��° II 'I , G ex x • l n20\ 17 I u => tt ` ` ; o 1 > I I / �� G \z e> �i • v >, sz as s >,• o o I f > • III L.is n i...44.111.) y U� 3 �>J F m I .• 'T n •�0•• s ,• *• 1130• •L '• •, L 1 s , I •r•�� I n e. • • — p� A is ••=j__—_____ • It * i ♦RISCOCTT „ � a •�• - — • •� e.ncncrrE _ _ _ _ • •_ J _ e d 17 • I 11 I R °°•• o .° • II tt. 30 Oi 'la r�� __ c-o • + • .•_gyp • .• w��•'•�' •— • °=I. >. I >• �°• > u , » ..>' »4 1IPTO1 • e • �� 7-i--F olL-.F . 0 2M, • g h•, • V l / i.i J �� I a A'� 1 • , I 9 NY �i , 6�I '• �� • Hupro o__ j sa • _ff • �.� i is i -1 \ �J 1, .. hJ J;? I .� • I •.• • I • .ACS 0ii ( w•�� \( i31�'rC I ~ tz / > •••= .n o� zB '• xz I . J 23 I I , ' , :1 B•j1� B I• • • • 1 ` 1 x xo\ yy ni• • �U, T. wni rEHeEiG 1 7• 'oI ('� I . x. .p• =o a /r41221 G° ax 4Q n • I. :. _ , .-1, nw._ llC17 „ :Vett. s 'I oo LEI {T r •_ _C _._-- • �� __ r � 'v\ •N• l\ • • 7 1k(2' ir7 I - I VI _ i II J I. • _. F • 727. S( l 1 4,930 ( \ V : \ ) �� 4• • P e'�{� F VA � A \ @M� • 4934 q,y,,,(,\ \\ i / l r � : V� 4939 Ireland j •, ��1' Res No Five/ , I , \ \ o V � p493e i� -. sao 4,9,90 od� �� ;J , 2 1 �" � 0 6, i � -,/, 5050 / \ 00 " I Jr • 57. �4�w.,'r Ewen • Gl II44^ 'n '�" i� • - o - N8 5036 -v 5034. - a959 --,4_ •Q i 1 5�V- 'c t-r. / K ` Well 496p- ter- ` -\ - � { i � i ' -- 1 / �weu Wo, ' cY\12 11 49]3a A l` � , � :— �r o t� :1 .._ _--- l 478 •., e. 496RP -i J A$0 1e 4982 V. • ' �..� ,r�� ,[d. (Q li d �� X23 \ { x'460 �� D � _..�.. L a 5050 ? !' I Well �� — N ////L � -j 3 Thc,____ K _ _,,,_..° _I , , , N , ... . , N„. , 14 \ weuol3 '� 18�i �& s y. , , \ �� \ Imo IV f �_ c\,) _I• N $ N , N�i\Ka _ X199 ,Well l , •17500< t— 1 — - 4998 �� \� ��c� �� - o s � sow ��( �� \„ well �; wdi 1 �� o �� o ; � - 0 Wei 23 So,� 4 006° ei }k�,' �.�S. AS .''.:‘`.14 .44 ' 00 1.O , ' '' .r.:fill.' .. . - 7,icgt:ix due f 5. .< ` 45" r� r ; t �� -A }'LL� ‘ T 4cT 5 < 'P 3 l 4...'' \ \ jet r p��$'g \ 0.2 tn t.,:;,,,I...v„,5,...4 \ 5 5 ..z.s,k7. , . ., ma, , . ro+ v Pa✓ .r t � d• .-'r.'v ..i: 1.. p,; ! �� . :. .—, .,....$ M , \ M ( rl fi'Yr,. ._. �fi. • . :^-*. . f- >l,-T 7- CERTIFICATE OF MAIL I N C I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of surrounding property owners in the case # S-245 for Twombly Ranch in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail , and addressed to the below stated persons , as per attached list This 18th day of April 1985 . / AME` OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WIT! Sri" FEET SPlease print or type NAME ADDRESS , TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTI-FICATION # 1 BETTY J. OTTENSEN, ET. AL. 466 S. 16th AVENUE 1475-05-00-00-016 BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 2. DAVID K. TROSTEL & 901 WELD COUNTY ROAD 11 1475-06-00-00-017 MARGARET C. TROSTEL ERIE, COLORADO 80516 4. ERVIN & JANE FRAFJORD 24020 WELD COUNTY ROAD 10 1475-18-00-00-001 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 6. ROBERT M. SWANK & 3581 WELD COUNTY ROAD 51 1475-18-00-00-019 MARY P. SWANK KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 8. RUSSELL J. & JOAN A. HAYES 24545 HIGHWAY 52 1475-06-00-00-018 16. STAR ROUTE, BOX 98 1475-06-00-00-005 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 9. CHARLES L. & 5198 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 1475-06-00-00-003 BARBARA J. PATTERSON HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 10. LORRAINE.M JONES P.O. BOX 413 1475-06-00-00-006 BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 12. FREDERIC L. & DARLA J. SYMAN 18669 WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 NO PARCEL NUMBER FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 ASSIGNED AS YET. 14. STANLEY J. & IRENE BOLLERS 3013 WELD COUNTY ROAD 47 1475-17-00-00-018 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of mineral owners in the case 11 S-245 for Twombly Ranch in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail , and addressed to the below stated persons , as per attached list This 19th day of April 1985 . `O1'-_S ",' PROPERTY WITHIN 50? -Fr t� Please print or type / T� • � l NAME ADDRESS , TOWN/CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ASSESSOR' S PARCEL IDENTIFICATION # 15 RAYMOND_R, R RRIICF E. KAUFFMAN 7532 WELD COUNTY ROAD 65 1475-08-00-00-022 KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 7. GEORGE, EMMA & WILLIE TAOKA 3127 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 1473-01-00-00-013 6 1473-13-00-00-021 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 Al. LLOYD LAND 14021 COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE 1473-12-00-00-011 BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 7-EDWARD & MARIE BERNHARDT 23571 WELD COUNTY ROAD 10 1473-12-00-00-010 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 ,/ FRANK H. RICKETSON,III 1515 VINE STREET 1475-18-00-00-016 DENVER, COLORADO 80206 -.ate Planned Unit Development Plan AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property SECTION 7. TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. , WFLD COUNTY. COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. Mineral interests in title of Union Pacific Railroad, 3350 Peoria, Denver, Colorado. See attached Title Committment. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this / day of <-7-eh-a.ie-sz7 , 19c9$ WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: �G04 6 /y-6 J latrat-e/A Notary Public. • f063, J r. is, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Amm (� PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT.4400 9O 5L 10th SO 80 3T 11 ��. GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 i- s' 1 ad t) t k . COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAPING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, May 7, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development Plan (Residential-One and Agricultural Uses) from Lloyd Land & Ronald Cook on a parcel of land described as Section 7, T1N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing 640 acres, more or less. The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Poom, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or obiections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631 , before the above date or presented at the public hearing on May 7, 1985. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400. Robert E. Ehrlich, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the La Salle Leader To be published one (1) time b April 25, 1985 Received b}'C, C/!/ �h/ et--w -<,/7 Date: `t'/ - / 2 J v°c . REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Twombly Ranch NUMBER: S-245:85:2 SENT REFERRALS OUT: April 10, 1985 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 26, 1985 NO SR NR NO SR NR X County Attorney / X Judith A. McGill Hudson Fire Protection District X Weld County Health Dept. P.O. Box 7 Hudson, CO 80642 / X Engineering Department X Bill McMurray / X County Extension Agent Weld County Planning Comm. V P.O. Box 161 X Office of Emergency Mngmt Brighton, CO 80601 v / X State Engineer X Julia Turney V Division of Water Resources Colorado Geological Survey 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Room 715 J Denver, CO 80203 X State Highway Department 1420 2nd Street J X Bob C. Gudka, Supt. Greeley, CO 80631 Weld County School Dist. RE-3(J) _ Colorado Department of Health P.O. Box 269 Water Quality Control Division Keenesburg, CO 80643 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, CO 80220 City of Greeley Planning Department 919 7th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Tri Area Planning Commission P.O. Box 363 Frederick, CO 80530 X Brighton Soil Conservation Service 60 S. 27th Avenue Brighton, CO 80601 X Dudley McGill Hudson Planning Commission P.O. Box 351 Hudson, CO 80642 536-9998 NO=No Objection SR-Specific Recommendations NR=No Response / . HUDSON PLANNING BOARD P. 0. Box 351 Hudson, Colorado 80642 April 24, 1985 Q laTIO APR 2C 1985 Weld Co. Planning Commission Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Att: Michael S. Mullen Current Planner Dear Mr. Mullen: We refer to Engineering Geologic Report by Consultant Judith L. Hamilton, Conclusions paragraph 3 and 4, pertaining to leach field site testing and elevating building sites above flood plain levels. Our Board feels these items should be of particular importance to further land owners. We have no problems with this proposal as long as the various advisory items are heeded. Thank you, Dudley McGill, Chairman Hudson Planning Board DM/ser r ( STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ENT .l P.O. Box 850 w�,8 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 ^ . (303) 353-1232 Cpl ;14--` co/apo April 17, 1985 Weld Co. , S.H. 52 Twombly Ranch P.U.D. 2 Mi. E. of Hudson on S. Side S.H. 52 Mr. Michael Mullen Department of Planning Services DOH File 45100 Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the Twombly Ranch Final P.U.D. application and have the following comments: The application material contains a copy of our May 4, 1984, review letter in which we commented on the need for additional right of way along State Highway 52, the status of our review of an application for access, and the location of new residences away from the highway to avoid potential adverse impacts due to traffic noise. We reaffirm our comments on the need for right of way and noise setbacks. Since that letter was written, an Access Permit was granted on June 29, 1984, for a single access to two single-family residences. These residences would be located on Lots 12 and 13 of this P.U.D. The access is in about the same location as a previously existing field driveway. Thank you for the opportunity to review this Final P.U.D. Please contact Wally Jacobson at this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, ALBERT CHOTVACS DISTRICT ENGINEER , 2 , 4 /---) / John K. Crier JKC:mbc District Planning/Environmental Manager cc: A. Chotvacs D. Yost Area Foreman File: Crier—Jacobson :ikV Weld Co. Planning Commission RICHARD D. LAMM ;4/ W r, Governor ,,, > O*) JERIS A. DANIELSON # � State Engineer F � ♦j /876-- OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 April 25, 1985 Mr. Michael Mullen Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Twombly Ranch PUll Sec. 7, T1N, R64W Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the above referenced Final Planned Unit Development. We do not have any new information which would alter our May 7, 1984 and Septem- ber 12, 1984 comments. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State Engineer HDS/JRH:ma/4650H cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. \ C ? Weld Co. CAMO I cnmrtussion of•co< O�9 RICHARD D. LAMM JERIS A. DANIELSON Governor h State Engineer /876 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 September 12, 1984 Mr. Michael S. Mullen Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CD 80631 Re: Twombly Ranch, #Z-407:84:8 Sec. 7, TIN, R64W Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to create three parcels from 606 acres. We previously reviewed this proposal on May 7, 1984. Our earlier comments still apply. The only additional comment we have is that a household use only well in the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer would be available on the 2.6-acre tract. How- ever, we feel this would be an expensive alternative. ahe existing well can be used for the 2.6-acre tract if it was constructed prior to 1972. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State Engineer HDS/JRH:ma/3398 cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. [ltl v 2rll 101.5 i „t Ii cP 1`r 1994 Weld Co. Planning i;ommissiau A".O? COzo RICHARD D. LA MM he JERIS A. DANIELSON Governor r State Engineer 2565H ** 4876 * OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 r� Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 _ / v 1, ,r y 11. 1984 May 7, 1984 Weld Co. Plaooin C Mr. Michael S. Mullen B ommission Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Twombly Ranch Section 7, T1N, R64W W. Div. 1 - W. Dist. 1 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have received the above referenced proposal to separate approximately 617 acres into 13 lots. Only one of the lots would be less than 35 acres. Our comments follow: 1. We presume the proposed 2.6-acre parcel already has a well. If this is not the case, we must ask that this proposal be referred back to us with information on how water would be supplied to the small lot. 2. Our review of lots over 35 acres is not required by statute and, therefore, we do not commit to permits on these larger lots. Also, we do not cite specifics of permits which might be sought. The application proposes Laramie-Fox Hills wells. Our information indi- cates it is about 1000 feet to the base of the Laramie-Fox Hills formation. We believe adequate water for domestic wells would be available from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. 3. The development lies on Box Elder Creek below Ireland No. 1 Reservoir and Ireland No. 4 Reservoir as shown on the topographic map. Infor- mation in our files indicates Ireland No. 1 Dam is eight feet high and has a capacity of 116 acre-feet. We believe Ireland No. 4 is somewhat smaller. 4. From the limited information in our files, it appears the floodway, should a dam break occur to the Ireland No. 1 and No. 4 Reservoirs, may be within the 100-year floodplain as identified on the plat. We recommend the county seek information delineating the dam break floodway, especially from Ireland No. 1, in order to make a determi- nation whether all lots would have an adequate building site above the dam break floodway. Where only a portion of a lot is above the floodway, the building site should be designated. Page 2 Mr. Michael S. Mullen May 7, 1984 5. We would also like to advise you that Bootleg Reservoir has been breached and no longer mitigates flood flows down Box Elder Creek. We recommend that a new 100-year floodplain be defined for planning purposes within this subdivision. 6. This office cannot recommend residential construction within the dam break floodway. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, D Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State Engineer HDS/KCK:ma cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Safety Branch Alan Pearson, Chief, Dam Steve Spann, Chief, Design Review Unit y I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION 1. !rc . Department of Planning Services, 915 — l0th Street. Greeley. Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 • FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. S f rS Z APPL. FEE 2 ZONING DISTRICT DATE -- �4 p RECORDING FEE jp RECEIPT NO, /9041.1 3- r—" APPL. CHECKED BY MG,— . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for requited signatures): I (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning proposed subdivision of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (If additional space Is required, attach an additional sheet of this same size.) NAME OF PROPOSED P.U.D. SUBDIVISION THE TWOMBLY RANCH EXISTING ZONING AGRICULTURAL PROPOSED ZONING P.U.D. TOTAL AREA (ACRES) 617.652 NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS J3 LOT SIZE: AVERAGE 47.51 MINIMUM UTILITIES: WATER: NAME WELLS - SEWER: NAME SEPTIC GAS: NAME NQ NF PHONE: NAME A.T. & T. DISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME HUDSON FIRE: NAME HIIOSON DESIGNERS' NAME McRAE & SHORT. INC. ADDRESS 1227 - 8th AVE_. GREELEY. CO. 80631 PHONE (303) 356-310I ENGINEERS' NAME AS ABOVE ADDRESS AS AROVF PHONE AS ABOVE FEE OWNER OF AREA PROPOSED FOR P.U.D. SUBDIVISION NAME LLOYD LAND ADDRESS 14021 COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE, BRIGHTON, CO. 80501 PHONE (303) 659-3153 NAME RONALD COOK _ ADDRESS P.O. BOX 273. HUDSON, CO. 80642 PHONE (303) Sib-9[41 NAME ADDRESS PRONE • I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements. proposals' and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Sign tire: Owner of uthorized Agent Subscribed'ard sworn to before me this 2S day of ,Z-7 -c(-�.,.-7 , 19c 5� -.1 . ' SEAL ... L1c,: . 2.(e—ye.c,/,/s7 . ' r•I c.-.0 NOTARY PUBLIC ' My commission expires: 0 /Y8G , . 5l F.04-79-026 WCDPS-IB-I niury LEEPER & CO. 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, Colorado 80022 (303) 288-5061 March 22, 1985 Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: P.U.D. For the TWotnbly Ranch Dear Sirs: The following is our statement as outlined in your packet for P.U.D. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: III APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Sub-paragraph No. 3 & 4) Public Service Co. and Telephone Co. along with the Hudson Fire Departureut has signed the subdivision plat. Water shall be from individual wells from the Foxhill-Laramie formation. (See attach- ed letter from Colorado Division of Water Resources May 7, 1984) . Sewer will be with septic tank and leach field. There will be no natural gas available. No. 5 ) N/a No. 6 ) No improvements shall be needed. No. 7 ) N/a No. 8 ) There will be no dedications. (See attached agree- nent dated September 12, 1984 between Keensburg School District #-3 and developers. No. 9 ) Attached No. 10) Attached • No. 11 & 12) Subdivision Plat and Protective Covenants shows a bridal path 20 feet wide which shall be by easement for use of lot owners. No. 13 ) There are no irrigation companies rights of ways on this property, except Ireland Reservoir #f4 as shown on the plat. No. 14 ) See attached letter frontivision of Highways, dated May 4, 1984. Each Office Is Independently Owned And Operated City LEEPER & CO. 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce Cily, Colr 10 80022 303) 288-5061 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES March 22, 1985 Page II No. 15) Attached No. 16) Attached No. 17) Attached No. 18) On preliminary plat No. 19) N/a No. 20) There shall be only one house together with garages, barns and corrals on each lots. This PUD subdivision shall have 13 single family dwellings. No. 21) This is rural P.U.D. subdivision that will allow people who want to be able to be part time farmers and ranchers, a Shane to do that. They will be able to work at their jobs and be within connuiting distance. Most of the lots have subirrigated pasture along with some farmland, ideal for those who want to own a few head of cattle or horses. No. 22) The common open space shall be used as a bridal path easement for benefit of each of the 13 lot owners. The lot owners shall own the land but there will be a bridal path easement reserved and given for the benefit of the Ttaombly Ranch Home Owners Association. This shall be done by a deed restriction. No. 23) N/a ., No. 24) Shall be done by the Protective Convenants. No. 25) Construction shall start as -soon as the county will issue a building permit. Lot 13 is scheduled to be the first lot to have a three bedroom ranch style house built. There will be a total of 13 single family houses built. It is anticipated that the subdivision will be finalized in five years. Yours truly, J"nnes Erger CENTURY 21 LEEPER & CO. JE/dw Each Office Is Independently Owned And Operated - k� r ! Q vJ ) i Public Service Public Service Company of Colorado Plane Valley Division -P.O. Box 158 33 righton,Colorado 8p911 March 25 , 1985 Weld County Depart- ment of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 To Whom It May Concern: The proposed planned unit development known as The Twombly Ranch is within electric service territory of Public Service Company of Colorado. Electric service is available in this area subject to the terms and conditions of Public Service Company ' s Electric Distribution Extension Policy and subject to the payment of any construction payments required. If you have any questions , or if I can be of further help., feel free to contact me. Eincerely , // `/taa/ Les A. Fraley , Engineer Marketing Department ZAF:gg MountainBell Greeley, Colorado March 15, 1985 Weld County Planning Commission 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attention: Michael S. Mullen Dear Sir: Mountain Bell will provide telephone facilities to the Twombly R-anch _Development in accordance with all applicable sates and tariffs presently on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission which includes the Land Developer Agreement. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, zf Sue Skaley Assistant Manager DSDC Hudson Fire Protection District Y.O. Box 7 Hudson, Colorado 80642 March 26, 1-985 Department of Planning -Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th, Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Tw.mbly Ranch (PUD) Dear Mike Mullen; The Hudson Fire Department will report to all emergencies located on the Twombly Ranch planned unit development. The response time would be 5 to 10 minutes, Sincerely, Ke =F L. l co y Robert Bullard President Hudson Fire Protection District RB/jm lRIC AFD D LAf,11,1 to � �� 9Q JERIS A. DANIELSON Governor State Engineer 2565H ar-u Na a 1876 * OFFICE OF TIiESTATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 0 I S1� —, (303) 866-3581 'rte, G ir�r� May 7, 1984 ( 1'" Y 1 19gq Weld Co. Planning Comndssio�, Mr. Michael S. Mullen Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, 80631 • • Re: Taombly -Ranch -Section 7, T1N, P64W W. Div. 1 - W. Dist. 1 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have received the above referenced proposal to separate approximately 617 acres into 13 lots. Only one of the lots would be less than 35 acres. Our concuents follow: 1. We presume the proposed 2.6-acre parcel already has a well. If this is not the case, we must ask that this proposal be referred back to us with information on how water would -be supplied to the small lot. 2. Our review of lots over 35 acres is not required by statute and, therefore, -we do not commit to hermits on these larger lots. -Also, we do not cite specifics of permits which might be sought. The application proposes Laramie-Fox Hills wells. Our information indi- cates it is about 1000 feet to the base of the Laramie-Fox Hills formation. We believe adequate -water for domestic wells would be available from the Laramie-Fox -Hills aquifer. 3. The development lies on Box Elder Creek below Ireland No. 1 Reservoir and Ireland No. 4 Reservoir as shown on the topographic map. Infor- mation in our files indicates Ireland No. 1 Dam is eight feet high and has a capacity of 116 acre-feet. We believe Ireland No. 4 is somewhat smaller. 4. From the limited information in our files, it appears the floodway, should a dam break occur to the Ireland No. 1 and No. 4 -Reservoirs, may be within the 100-year floodplain as identified on the plat. We recommend the county seek information delineating the dam break floodway, especially from Ireland No. 1, in order to make a determi- nation whether,, all lots would have an adequate building site above the dam break flocdway. Where only a portion of a lot is above the floodway, the building site should be designated. Page 2 Mr. Michael S. Mullen May 7, 1984 5. We would also like to advise you that Bootleg Reservoir has been breached and no longer -mitigates flood flows down -Box Elder Creek. We reconuiend that a new 100-year floodplain be defined for pia' -n9 purposes within this subdivision. 6. This office cannot reconuiend residential construction within the dam break floodway. Please let me know if you -have any questions. Sincerely, Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Assistant State _Engineer HDS/KCK:ma cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Alan Pearson, Chief, Dam Safety Branch Steve Spann, Chief, Design Review Unit • AGREEMENT This Agreement made this 12th day of September , 1984, between Ronald A. Cook and Lloyd L 1, Owners and James Erger, Developer, hereinafter the "Developer" and Keenesburg School District Re-3, hereinafter the 'District". WHEREAS, the Developer has embarked upon a proposed development described as, Twombly Ranch, Section 7, TIN, R64W of the 6th-P.M. , Weld County, Colorado and hereinafter referred to as the "Project", and WHEREAS, the Developer and the District have determined that carrying out the terms of this Agreement will-prove mutually beneficial to the Developer and the District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding and the mutual covenants herein it is agreed as follows: 1. Within ten (10) days after the sale of each parcel within the Project, the Developer shall pay to the District an amount equal to one-half of the District's authorized revenue base per pupil of attendance entitlement for the year in which the sale is completed, -as such term is determined and defined in the Public School Finance Act of 1973. In the event such Act is modified in a manner that renders the term "authorized revenue base per pupil of attendance entitlement" inappropriate for use in this Agreement, the parties shall negotiate a successor amount, but in no event shall such successor amount to less than that computed for the previous year. 2. The District shall not object to or oppose formally of_informally approval and completion of the Project as currently planned and projected and shall not bring any suit or action to enjoin or interfere with the Project as currently planned and projected. The_District shall allow the Developer to utilize accurate information regarding the District's educational programs in promotions and advertisements for the Project and shall cooperate to provide such information to the _Developer. 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, assigns and heirs to the parties hereto. 4. In the event either party heretoshall fail to-perform in accordance with the covenants of the Agreement, the other party may compel such performance in any court of competent jurisdiction and the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover, in addition to any damages and to any speci-fic performance ordered, • ' all costs and-reasonable attorney fees incurred in enforcing the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parites hereto have set their hands and seals Jan the date first above written. n [1 Owner `f�'l",.� Deve er Owner Boar President , l'3?4 Date 1 ,.j i L �. Doi t.fJI_rk, B d Secretary • COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY Transamerica Title Insuranc-e Company r AMOUNT PREMIUM , Century-21 Leper OWNER $ TBD $ TBD 729-0 Magnolia MORTGAGE $ $ Commerce City, Co 8002D ADDITIONAL CHARGES $ Attn: Jim -Ers3er COST OF-TAX CERTIFICATE $ J SURVEY COSTS $ TOTALS $ Your Reference CC's To: TA/Brighton No. 8018257 C Other County No. 3007_826 Sheet 1 of 6 COMMITMENT TO INSURE Transamerica Title_Insurance Company, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits-to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or-mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A,upon payment of the-Premiums and chargestherefor; all subject to the provisions-ofSchedulesA_andBandtothe:onditionsandstipula- tions attached. Customer Contact: Linda/wlc By Wanda L. Calhoon Phone: 659-8270 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE The effective date of this commitment is March 4 , 19 8 5 at 7 : 00 A M. At which time fee title was vested in: RONALD COOK, as to Parcel 1 LLOYD LAND, as to -Parcel 2 SCHEDULE A 1. Policies to be issued: (A) Owners': TO BE DETERMINED (B) Mortgagee's: jmb/5 Form No.C-111.1 -Rev.7-1-BI 8018257 Sheet 2 of 6 SCHEDULE A—Continued 2. Covering the Land in the State of Colorado, County of Weld Described as: PARCEL 1: The Eh and the Eh of the W' of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. PARCEL 2 : The W1 of the W1 of Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. Form No.C-142.2 P 8018257 Sheet 3 of 6 SCHEDULE A—Continued REQUIREMENTS 3. The following are the requirements to be complied with prior to the issuance of said policy or policies. Any other instrument recorded subsequent to the date hereof may appear as an exception under Schedule B of the policy to be issued. Unless otherwise noted,all documents must be recorded in the office of clerk and recorder of the county in which said property is located. A. Release by the Public Trustee of: Deed of Trust from RONALD COOK to the Public _Trust-ee of the County of Weld for the use of PHILIP T. _APEL, B. T. GRIFFITH, VELENA EGGLESTON and VIRGINIA STEELE to secur-e $215, 01)0 .00 dated December 1, 1983 recorded December 6, L983 in -Book 1014 as Reception No . 1949161 (Affects E' and E' of the W1) B. Release by t₹xe Public Trustee of : Deed of Trust from LLOYD LAND to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of PHILIP T. APEL, B. T. GRIFFITH, VELENA EGGLESTON and VIRGINIA -STEELE to secure $53 , 750 .00 dated December 1 , 1983 recorded Dec-ember 6, 13983 in Bock 1014 as Reception no . 1949157 (Affects W1 of the W1) C. Certificate of Satisfaction issued by the Clerk of the Court, of Judgment in favor of -PALOMBO FARMS OF COLORADO, INC. , a Colorado Corporation fka ANGELO PALOMBO and LINDA PALOMBO d/b/a PALOMBO FARMS against LLOYD LAND , RONALD COOK and PATRICK ERGER, in the amount of $6 , 000 .0-0 plus interest and court costs, -entered on October 23 , 198-4 in Adversary No. 84 C 759 , District Court, District of Colorado, transcript of which was recorded November 15, 1984 in Book 1049 as Reception No. 01988701 . OR Evidence satisfactory to _Transamerica Title Insurance Company that the debtor shown above is net the same person as LLOYD LAND and RONALD COOK, owners hereunder. D. Deed from RONALD COOK and LLOYD LAND to GRANTEE OR GRANTEES TO BE DETERMINED arm No.Cd12.3 8018257 Sheet 4 of 6 SCHEDULE B THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO_BE ISSUED HEREUNDER WILL NOT INSURE AGAINST: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not-shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the-public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, im- posed by lawand not shown by the public records. 5. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments,charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. 6. Rights of way for county roads 30 feet wide on each side of Section and Township lines, as established by order of the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County, recorded October 14 , 1889 in Book 86 at Page 273. 7. All _coal and other minerals within or underlying said land, the exclusive right to prospect in and upon said land for coal and other minerals therein, or which may be -supposed to he therein, and to mine for and -remove -from said land all coal and other minerals which may be found thereon by anyone, together with the right of ingres-s , egress and regress upon said land to prospect for mine, and remove any and all such coal or other minerals and the right to use so much of said land as may be convenient or necessary for the right of way to and from such prospect places or mines , and for the convenient and proper operation of such prospect Places, mines and for roads and approaches thereto or for removal therefrom of coal, mineral, machinery or other material; also to -maintain and operate its railroad in its present form of construction and -to mak-e any change in the farm of construction or method of operation of said Railroad, as reserved by _Union Pacific Railroad Company in the Deed to Benjamin F. Twombly, recorded May 4 , 190_0 in Book 178 at Page 322, and any interests therein or rights thereunder . 8. The Denver Hudson Canal, and any and -all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed June 22 , 1908 -as Reception ND. 130376 , insofar as the -same -nay affect subject property. (Affects NE3NE ) 9. Prosnect -Reservoir and sunnly system, and any and all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed April 21, 1914 as Reception No. 70042-0 , insofar a-s the same may affect -subject property. (Affects NE1N£;) 10. Ireland Reservoir No. 4 , and -any and -all ri-ghts of way therefore , a-s evidenced by Map and -Statement filed October 26 , 1920 a-s Reception No. 337414 , insofar a-s -the same may affect subject property. (Affects E1 of the W1 and W1/25E1) Form No.C-142.4 Rev.4-18-75 8018257 Sheet 5 of 6 SCHEDULE B—Continued 11 . Ireland Ditch, and any and all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed January 13 , 1916 as Reception No. 224014 insofar as the same -may affect subject property. (Affects SW; NW4 and W/ SW1. ) 12 . Right of way for public nignway, as granted to Weld County, Colorado by Mrs. B. F. -Twombly in the instrument recorded March 25, 1931 in Book -911 at Page 62, affecting the following described property : A strip of ground being 10 feet wide, it being all of the -South 10 feet of the North 4-0 feet of Section 7. 13 . Right of way for a public highway, as granted to Weld County, Colorado, by Margaret May Twombly in the instrument recorded June 19 , 1951, in Book 1305 at Page 459 , affecting the following described property: A tract or parcel of land in the N1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the £th P.M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows : Beginning as the Northwest corner of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West; 1. thence -along the West line of Secti-on 7 , SOO°05 'E, a distance of 39. 0 feet; 2. thence N89°36 'E, a distance of 1182. 1 feet; 3. thence 371°24 'E, a distance of 249. 0 feet; 4 . thence N6-6°16 'E, a distance of 50 . 7 feet; 5. thence N89°36 'E, a distance of 950. 0 feet; 6. thence N75°34 'E, a distance-of 206. 2 feet; 7 . thence N89°3T 'E, a distance of 3D0 . 0 feet; 8 . thence N83°19 '30'1E, a distance of 100. 6 feet; 9. thence N89°3b '£, a distance of 1100 .3 feet; 1D . thence $39'49 '30"E, a distance of 100. 0 feet; 11. thence N89°36 '-E, a distance of 715 . 1 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal. 12. thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal, N32°33 'W, a distance of 47 .3 feet, to the North line of Section 7 ; 13. thence along the West line of Section 7 , S89'36 'W, a distance of 4903 . 8 feet, more or less to the point of beginning 14 . Right of way to construct, operate, maintain, change or remove its electric transmission and/or distribution lines , with all poles , cross arms , cables , wires , guys , supports , fixtures and devices, used or useful in the operation of said line through and along a _course as said line may be hereafter constructed in, through, over and across the N1/2 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range b4 West of the 6th P.M. Together with the right to enter upon said premises , survey, construct, maintain, operate, control and use said transmission line and to remove objects inter- e .m No.C-141.5 8018257 Sheet 6 of 6 SCHEDULE B--Continued 14 . continued. . . . feting therewith, and the right to permit the attachment of wires of any other Company as conveyed to Colorado Central Power Company, by Margaret Twombly in the instrument _recorded February 20 , 1952 in Book 1324 at Page 174 , affecting the following described property: (1) One pole and one anchor approximately 1450 feet East and approximately 103 feet South of the Northwest corner of said -section. (This pole and anchor to be 6-8 feet South of State Highway 32 Right-of-Way.) (2) One anchor 135 feet South of the North ix corner -of said section. (This anchor to be approximately 35 feet South of Stag Highway 52 Right of :iay. ) 15 . Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Surface Owners Agreement between Margaret May Twombly, Della Louise Griffith, Lena Marie Twombly Apel and Union Pacific Railroad Company, recorded April 2, 1971 in Book 643 , as Reception No. 1565010 . NOTE: The following notices pursuant -to CRS 9-1 . 5-103 concerning under- ground facilities have been filed with the Clerk and Recorder. The-se statements are general and do not necessarily give notice of underground facilities within the subject property. (a) Mountain Bell Telephone Company recorded October 1 , 1981 in Book 949 , as Reception No. 1870705 . (b) Public Service Company recorded November 9 , 1981 in Book 952 as Recep- tion No. 1874084 . (c) Union Rural Electric Association, Inc . recorded Ocrober 5 , 1981 in Book 949 as Reception No. 1871004 . Form No.C-142.5 Transamerica Title Insurance Company Arapaho-Douglas Lorimer 2000 West Littleton Boulevard 151 West Mountain Avenue Littleton.Colorado 80120 Fort Collins.Colorado 80521 (303)705-4000 (303)493-6194 • • Denver-Adams Mesa 1800 Lawrence Street 531 Rood Avenue Denver Colorado 80202 Grand Junction.Colorado 81501 (303)291-4800 (303)234-8234 Boulder Tlikln 1317 Spruce Street 801 East Hopkins Street Boulder,Colorado 80302 Aspen,Colorado 81611 (303)443.7180 (303)025-1788 Eagle Pueblo 0020 Eagle Road 627 North Main Street Eagle-Mail.tolondo 81658 Pueblo,Colorado 81003 (303)049-5813 (303)543-0451 El Paw Rotrtt-Jackson 418 South Weber Street 501 Lincoln Street,Box 773588 Colorado Springs.Colorado 80003 Steamboat Springs.Colorado 80477 (303)034-3731 (303)879-1611 Jefferson -Vhld 1675 Carr Street 918 Tenth Street Lakewood,Colorado 80215 Greele9 Colorado 80631 (303)231-2800 (303)352-2283 Transamerica Title Services CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS Please read carefully 1. This is a Commitment to issue one or more policies of title insuranc-e in our Standard Form when the requirementsset forth in the Commitment have been satisfied- The policy is available and should be examined before this Commitment is used if there is any question about coverage. 2. Only the policies shown -are committed to. If there are any changes in the transaction, order an amendment from us. 3. The date on this Commitment is important. Nothing after that date has been considered by us. 4. This Commitment is good for-6 months only. Extensions should be ordered _from us if they -are needed. S TAT;= Of: CU Ll1 FiP S. S. CERTIFICAti )F TAXES DUE _COUNTY OF WELD I, the undersigned, County Treasurer in and for said County,do hereby certify that there are no unpaid taxes, or unredeemed tax sales, al appears of record in the office,on the following described property,to-wit: NO. 014164 £8239 E /E 2 W2 l 1 64 LEXC LIPPR R S ( 1 OR) .RCEL 147507000025 000 .ME C01)1< RONALD NDOR JAMES I:::Ri::f::R M/489 CEPT- 1984 TAXES -- $300 .90 INTEREST DUI::: $0.00 TOTAL_ AMOUNT DUE FOR THIS PAR( EL.. -- $300 .. 90 This does not include land-or improvements assessed separately or special District assessments unless specifically requested. In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and seal, this MARCH 08 , 1985 FRANCIS M. LOUSTALET TREASURER OF WELD COUNTY By /�.!`a +�/ !?-lie/it�-ri S. S. CEflTIFICA' JF TAXES DUE �� COUNTY OF WILD I, the undersigned, County Treasurer in and for said County,do hereby certify that there are no unpaid taxes,or unredeemed tax sates, a appears of record in the office,on the following described property,to-wit: NO. 037:40 8239--A W 2 W 2 7 1 64 r:xr UPRR RES (6R 10.04.`;\RCEL 147507000024 000 AME LAND LLOYD =ND0R JAMES ERGER M/488 WEPT- 1984 TAXES -- $119.68 INTEREST DUE $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE FOR THIS PARCEL.. -- $119. 60 This does not include land or improvements assessed separately or special District assessments unless specifically requested• In Witness Whereof, I have herewith set my hand and seal, this MARCH 08. 19£3:'.> FRANCIS M. LOUSTALET TREASURER OF WELD COUNTY By �)" .. - si iv�.��,� . PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR TWCAKBLY RANCH SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Janes Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook are the owners of all the following described property situated in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to-wit: TWCMBLY RANCH SUBDIVISION. WHEREAS, James Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook desire to place certain restrictions onthhe-plots shown on the plot of said subdivision for the use and benefit of the present owners and for their grantees, in order to establish and maintain as a carefully protected country residential subdivision and to preserve country atnusphere. NCM THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the -said parties for them- selves, their heirs, successors, grantees, and assigns do hereby acknowledge and declare and agree, with, to, and for the benefit of all parties who may hereafter purchase and from time to time hold and own any of said plots, that they own the sane subject to the following restrictions, convenants and conditions, all of which shall be deemed to run with the land and to inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the owners at any time of any of the said plots, their heirs, and personal representatives, successors, grantees and assigns, to-wit: 1. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL CUtff1'I'EE: A committee consisting of James Erger, Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook are hereby constituted to exercise certain functions as hereinafter provided. A majority of the committee may designate a representative or representatives to act for it. Any vacancies in said committee created by resignation, death or -any other cause shall be filled by the remaining members of the committee. The members of the committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered hereunder. At any time, after January the first, Ninteen Hundered and Ninety Three the record owners of a majority of the -plots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instunnient, to change the neobership of the committee. 2. APPROVAL OF PLANS: No buildings, fence, wall or structure shall be erected placed or altered on any plot in this subdivision until the building plans, speci- fications, and plot plans showing the location of such building, fence or wall stricLure: have been submitted in writing and approved by the Architectural Control Cannittee in writing as to general plan and external design and as to location. Should the committee fail to approve or disapprove such plan, design and location within 30 days after the same have been submitted to it, then such approval will not be required and the requirements of this covenant will be deemed to have been net if a written application for approval was in fact submitted to the Architectural Control Committee. All structures shall be completed within twelve months from the date construction is started. 3. DEFINITIONS: A "residence" as the word is used herein is intended to include any attached garage, but said attached garage shall not be decried included in the square footage required _for the dwelling. An "outbuilding" as the word is used herein is intended to mean a covered structure, wholly or partially enclosed and detached from the principal building or dwelling. 4. USE OF LAND: No more than one single family dwelling of not more than two (2) stories in height shall be erected on any plot and all outbuildings shall be not more than two (2) stories in height. No buildings of any kind whatsoever shall be erected or maintained except private dwelling houses and such outbuildings as are customarily appurtenant to such dwellings. No used buildings or used houses may be moved unto or placed upon property in the subdivision. 5. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF BUILDING: No residence or attached garage shall be built on said property wherein less than 15% of the outside surface of the walls are brick, stone, or other approved masonry accepted by the Architectural Control Committee. No unfinished concrete or unfinished cinder block buildings shall be erected or permitted on any lot or tract. No building shall be roofed with roll roofing. Metal buildings may be allowed, however they shall be factory engineered steel truss type, with factory baked paint or enamel, set on county approved concrete footing and foundation. All outbuildings shall correspond in style and architecture to the country residential atmosphere. A log house, modular or other all wood exterior designs may be allowed subject to the -approval of the Architectural Control Comittee. 6. SET BACK OF BUILDINGS FROM STREET LINES: No outbuilding or no residence or any part thereof, except the steps, piazza, or bay window, shall be erected on any plot and within 30 feet of the side yard lot line of each plot. For the purpose of this covenant, eaves, steps piazza and bay windows shall not be considered as a part of the building, provided however, that this provision shall not be construed to permit any portion of the building on a plot to encroach upon another plot. 7. D.,1FLING SIZE; No tri-level stucture shall have less than 1800 square feet of floor space on the first story and upper level combined. No bi-level shall have less than 900 square feet on the ground floor and not less than 100 squire feet on the up,' - level. No two story shall'have less than 1000 square feet on the ground floor and not less than 700 square feet on the upper level. No other residential structure shall be erected or placed on any plot in this subdivision unless it contains a minimum of 1500 square feet of floor area on the ground floor level. In addition, all buildings must conform to the country minimum square footage requirements. The square footage requirements referred to in this paragraph shall not include the garage, patio, or any other type of accessory use structure, whether connected in whole or in part with the residential unit. All residences shall be required to have a two car attached or detached garage. 8. NUISANCE: No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any plot, nor shall anything be done thereon whidh may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. 9. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: No basement dwelling, mobile home, nor any other structure of a temporary nature, may be used as a dwelling either temporarily or permanently, except that a trailer or mobile home may be used only during construction of a permanent home with the specific peunission of the Architectural Conti.ul Committee, and in accordance with the requirements and regulations of Weld County, but in no case, for longer than 12 months. 10. SIGNS: No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any plot except one professional sign of not more than two square feet, flat mounted, unanimated and nonflashing or one sign of not more than six square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used and erected by builder to advertise the property during the period when construction and sales of new dwellings occur within this subdivision. 11. MAINTENANCE OF TRENIISES: No plot shall be used for storage of house trailers or outdoor storage of cars, heavy equipment, goods, wares, merchandise, material, rock, gravel, sand, earth, ashes, junk, trash, or scrap materials, except for the storage of lumber or other building material during the construction of a dwelling. Each plot shall be kept in a sanitary and sightly condition at all tines. Weeds shall be kept unwed. A landowner may be granted a temporary exception to the requirements of this paragraph upon written application and approval by the Architectural Control Committee upon determination that such temporary exception shall not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of this subdivision. 12. LIVESTOCK AND ANIMALS: No more than 20 large animals such as horses, cattle or sheep shall be permitted on any plot. No goats or hogs shall be allowed on any plot. No more than two dogs and three cats shall be allowed on any plot. No more than 50 chickens and 50 rabbits shall be allowed on any plot. Hobbies which in no way create unhealthy or unpleasant conditions for the neighbors or which in no way damage the neighbors or the appearance of the neighborhood. In the event of a question as to whether any hobby is in violation of the covenants, application may be made by any party affected by such hobby to the Architectural Control Committee for final determination. In no event shall poultry be kept on any plot until an approved structure is erected for the housing of said poultry and until an area of sufficient size is enclosed with a fence as approved by the Architectural Control Committee for the containment of the said poultry. All animals mist always ,be kept under control on the premises where authorized. 13. HEALTH: All property in the subdivision shall be maintained and kept in a manner so as not to cause, allow or continue conditions on property in the sub- division which spread disease, bad odors, dust or effect the health, safety, or welfare of other residents of the subdivision. 14. MEMBERSHIP IN TWCMBLY RANCH HOME CWNERS ASSOCIATION: Each owner of any plot located within this subdivision shall be a member of Twombly Ranch Homeowners Association, a non profit association organized for the system care, maintenance and repair of Homeowner-Trail as shown on the platt of Ttaombly Ranch Subdivision, including fences, gates and any other structures. Furthermore, each owner herein shall as a member of said non-profit association comply with all By-Laws, regulations and decisions of the said non-profit association. Members of the association may vote to assess themselves from time to time as the need arises to make any necessary repairs. All members of the said association shall have the right to use the Hun owner Trail. 15. TERM: These covenants shall run with the land and shall bind all parties and all persons -claiming under them until January 1, 1993, at which time they shall automatically be extended for successive five year periods; unless, by a vote of the owners of 75 percent of the land area of the total subdivision said covenants are changed in whole or in part and such change duly recorded. 16. ENFORCEMENT: Any recorded property owner of this subdivision may initiate a proceeding at law or in equity against any party or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant, to restrain violations or to recover damages. Such violater or violators will be subject to a decree of specific performance and payment of attorney fees and costs of any legal action necessary to enforce these covenants. 17. SEVERABILTY: Invalidation of any one of these convenants by judgement of court shall in no ways affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect/ c ,DATED—: `' '1 "s-_C� day ofLJ2C c J , /17f5 State of Colorado,')% , County of Adams -.)\?u ss The-wit hui'an4 foregoing ins trunen as acknowledged before'me this.�1"day of j7n i,A, /`/Ls- by James L f 'ger/Lloyd Land and Ronald Cook - .7.---- .12-c---- C,77,--I _, Mar. 20,1JNbtary Public STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 !%: \:\ (303) 353-1232 , May 4, 1984 Weld County SH 52 Twombly Ranch PUD Mr. Michael Mullen 2 Mi . E. of Hudso Department of Planning Services on S. Side of 52 Weld County DOH FILE 45100 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Mullen: We have reviewed the Twombly Ranch P.U.D. and have the following comments. 1 . Projected traffic on State Highway 52 indicates the need for a 150-foot total right of way (75 feet each side of the highway centerline) . Addi- tional width to meet this need should be provided along this entire property's frontage on S.H. 52 by setback, reservation , or (preferably) dedication as permitted by local regulations. 2. This office is now considering an application for access to this property from S.H. 52 to serve proposed Lot 12. There is one existing farm access on S.H. 52 serving the Twombly Ranch; therefore, we will allow a single direct access to remain. This single access will be required to serve both Lots 12 and 13. No other direct access to the highway will be permitted between Weld County Roads 49 and 51 . The exact location of this access will be coordinated with the property owner. 3. Any new residences along S.N. 52 should be set as far as possible away from the highway to avoid adverse impacts due to traffic noise. Thank you for the opportunity to review this P.U.D. Very truly yours, ALBERT CH0TVACS DISTRICT ENGINEER W. F. Reisbeck .L District -Preconstruction Enline r WFR:da cc: A. Chotvacs D. Yost Area Foreman • File? Crier-Jacobson w/encl . jam. Planned Unit Development Plan AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. , WELD COUNTY , COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD THE UM)ERSICNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a 'title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. Joliet The _foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this c day r J 19erfS. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: lob l 56F 4 Notary Public •, 0 7 A / ' /727— cf. w : X9,6" n",,� , � Lic <" vAY; U, 0PERTY WITHIN 5r ' T Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION N 1. BITTY J. OTTENSEN, IT. AL. 466 S. 16th AVENUE 1475-05-00-00-016 BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 2. DAVID K. TROSTEL & 901 WELD COUNTY ROAD 11 1475-06-00-00-017 MARGARET C. TROSTEL ERIE, COLORADO 80516 4 ERVIN & JANE FRAFJORD 24020 WELD COUNTY ROAD 10 1475-18-00-00-001 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 6. ROBERT M. SWANK & 3581 WELD COUNTY ROAD 51 1475-18-00-00-019 MARY P. SWANK K£ENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 8. RUSSELL J. & JOAN A. HAYES 24545 HIGHWAY 52 1475-06-00-00-018 16. STAR ROUTE, BOX 98 1475-06-00-00-005 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 9. CHARLES L. & 5198 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 1475-06-00-00-003 BARBARA J. PATTERSON HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 10. LLR$ALNE.M. JONES P.O. BOX 413 1475-06-00-00-006 BRIGHTON, CO. 80601 12. FREDERIC L. & DARLA J. SYMAN 18669 WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 NO PARCEL NUMBER FORT LUPTON, COLORADO 80621 ASSIGNED AS YET. 14. STANLEY J. & IRENE BOLLERS 3013 WELD COUNTY ROAD 47 1475-17-00-00-018 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 Please print or type - - NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY , ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION # L4 5_ RAYMOND R. R RRIir.F E. KAUFFMAN 7532 WELD COUNTY ROAD 65 1475-08-00-00-022 KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 ✓l. GEORGE, EMMA & WILLIE TAOKA 3127 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 1473-01-00-00-013 5. HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 1473-13-O0-00-021 /11. LLOYD LAND 14021 COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE 1473-12-00-00-011 BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 • v -EDWARD & MARIE BERNHARDT 23571 WELD COUNTY ROAD 10 1473-12-00-00-010 HUDSON, COLORADO 80642 L,..,----FRANK H. RICKETSON,III 1515 VINE STREET 1475-18-00-00-016 DENVER, COLORADO 80206 Planned Unit Development Plan AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property SECTION 7 . TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. . WELD COUNTY. COIORADO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) • THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder 's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. Mineral interests in title of Union Pacific Railroad, 3350 Peoria, Denver, Colorado. See attached Title Committment, The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this /87 day of �M«i�r�j , 19e.� WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: log /5th Notary Publir. • /Z27 C I IfORM NO. C-5000-1 ,M a— 19 0 (AMENDED to-I i :o FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AM. .N LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLIC SCHEDULE Policy No.8014697 Amount of Insurance S 225,000 . 00 Date of Policy December 7 , 1983 Sheet 1 of _5. 7 : 00 A.M. 1. Name of Insured: RONALD COOK 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: RONALD COOK �LfFD FORM NO. C-6000-2 FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10-17.70) FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM B-1970 (AMENDED 10-17-701 SCHEDULE A—Continued The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of Colorado, County of Weld , and is described as follows: The E1/2, and the Ell of the W1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. .) FORM NO. C-6OOO-3B FOR USE WITH_COLORADO REGION AME. .LAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY- JRM t-1970 (AMENDED 10-17.70) SCHEDULE B This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: �- �•.,� I. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 40 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a cor• rect survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district.The 1982 General taxes paid, according to tax certificate dated October 17, 1983. 6 . Rights of way for county roads 30 feet wide on each side of Section and Township lines , as established by order of the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County , recorded October 14 , 1889 in Book 86 at Page 273 . 7 . All coal and other minerals within or underlying said land, the exclusive right to prospect in and upon said land for coal and other minerals therein, or which may be supposed to be therein, and to mine for and remove from said land all coal and other minerals which may be found thereon by anyone, together with the right of ingress , egress and regress upon said land to prospect for mine, and remove any and all such coal or other minerals and the right to use so much of said land as may be convenient or necessary for the right of way to and from such prospect places or mines , and for the convenient and proper operation of such prospect places , mines and for roads and approaches thereto or for removal therefrom of coal, mineral, machinery or other material ; also to maintain and operate its railroad in its present form of construction and to make any change in the form of construction or method of operation of said Railroad, as reserved by Union Pacific Railroad Company in the Deed to Benjamin F. Twombly, recorded May 4 , 1900 in Book 178 at Page 322 , and any interests therein or sights thereunder . 8 . The Denver Hudson Canal, and any and all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed June 22 , 1908 as Reception No. 130376 , insofar as the same may affect subject property. ( Affects NFNEa) 9 . Prospect Reservoir and suonly system, and any and all rights of way therefore , as evidenced by Map and Statement filed April 21, 1914 as Reception No. 200420 , insofar as the same may affect subject property. (Affects NE;NE,) p 10 . Ireland Reservoir No. 4 , and any and all rights of Ay therefore , as evidenced by Map and Statement filed October 26 , 1920 as Reception No. 337414 , insofar as the same may affect subject property. (Affects E1/2 of the W1 and WISE,) FORM NO. C.6000-3C FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION An1En.CAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 19/0 (AMENDED 10-17-701 • F-OR VSE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY—FORM B-1970 (AMENDED 10-17-70) SCHEDULE B—Continued op 1. Right of way for public nignway, as granted to Weld County, Colorado by Mrs . B. F. Twombly in the instrument recorded March 25, 1931 in Book 911 at Page 62 , affecting the following described property : A strip of ground being 10 feet wide, it being all of the South 10 feet of the North 40 feet of Section 7 . 2 . Right of way for a public highway, as granted to Weld County, Colorado, by Margaret May Twombly in the instrument recorded June 19 , 1951, in Book 1305 at Page 459 , affecting the following described property: A tract or parcel of land in the N1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North , Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows : Beginning as the Northwest corner of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West; 1. thence along the West line of Section 7 , S00°05 'E , a distance of 39 . 0 feet; 2. thence N89°36 ' E, a distance of 1182 . 1 feet; 3 . thence S71°24 'E , a distance of 249 . 0 feet; 4 . thence N66° 16 ' E , a distance of 50 . 7 feet; 5. thence N89°36 ' E, a distance of 950 . 0 feet; COO lir S . thence N75°34 ' E, a distance-of 206 . 2 feet; 7 . thence N89 °36 ' E , a distance of 300 . 0 feet; 8 . thence N83° 19 ' 30"E, a distance of 100 . 6 feet; 9 . thence N89° 36 'E, a distance of 1100 . 0 feet; 10 . thence S89°49 ' 30"E, a distance of 100 . 0 . feet; 11. thence N89°361E, a distance of 715 . 1 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal. 12 . thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal, N32°35 'W, a distance of 47 . 3 feet, to the North line of Section 7 ; 13 . thence along the West line of Section 7 , 589°36 'W, a distance of 4903 . 8 feet, more or less to the point of beginning Right of way to construct, operate, maintain, change or remove its electric transmission and/or distribution lines , with all poles , cross arms , cables , wires , guys , supports , fixtures and devices , used or useful in the operation of said line through and along a course as said line may be hereafter constructed in , through, over and across the N1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North , Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. Together with the right to enter upon said premises , survey, construct, maintain , operate, control and use said transmission line and to stove objects inter- fering therewith, and the right to permit the attachment of wires of any other Company as conveyed to Colorado Central Power Company , by Margaret Twombly in the instrument recorded February 20 , 1952 in Book 1324 at Page 174 , affecting the following described property : ( 1) One pole and one anchor approximately 1450 feet East and approximately 103 feet South of the Northwest corner of said section . (This pole and anchor to be 68 feet South of State Highway 52 Right-of-Way . ) ( 2) One anchor 135 feet South of the North i corner of said section . (This anchor to be approximately 35 feet South of State Highway 52 Right of 1'; - 1 FORM NO. C-6000-3C FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10-17-701 FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM S-1970 (AMENDED 10.17.70) SCHEDULE B—Continued 14 . Terms , agreements, provisions , conditions and obligations as contained in Surface Owners Agreement between Margaret May Twombly, Della Louise Griffith, Lena Marie Twombly Apel and Union Pacific Railroad Company, recorded April 2 , 1971 in Book 643 , as Reception No. 1565010 . 15. Deed of Trust from : Ronald Cook to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld fortheuseof Philip T. Apel, B.T. Griffith , Velena Eggleston and Virginia Steele to secure $215 , 000 . 00 dated December 1, 1983 recorded • December 6 , 1983 in Book 1014 as Reception No. 1949161 FORM NO. C-5000.1 FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM B- 1970 (AMENDED 10-17-70) SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance$ 75 , 000. 00 Policy No. 8014699 Date of Policy December 7 , 1983 Sheet 1 of 5_ 7 : 00 A.M. 1. Name of Insured: ti:_ f _ 1 LLOYD LAND 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: LLOYD LAND • ' FORM NO.06000.2 FOR USE WITH COLORADO1REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLIC,'1s.0 (AMENDED 10-17-70) FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY—FORM 8-1970 (AMENDED 10.17-70) SCHEDULE A—Continued The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of Colorado, County of Weld , and is described as follows: The W1 of the W1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. CO • • FORM NO. C-6000-3B .. rOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM- -I97O (AMENDED 10-17-70) SCHEDULE B This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a cor- rect survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water ^r sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. The 1982 General taxes paid, according to tax certificate dated October 17 , 1983. 6 . Rights of way for county roads 30 feet wide on each side of Section and Township lines , as established by order of the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County, recorded October 14 , 1889 in Book 86 at Page 273. 7. All coal and other minerals within or underlying said land , the exclusive right to prospect in and upon said land for coal and other minerals therein, or which may be supposed to be therein, and to mine for and remove from said land all coal and other minerals which may be found thereon by anyone, together with the right of ingress , egress and regress upon said land to prospect for mine , and remove any and all such coal or other minerals and the right to use so much of said land as may be convenient or necessary for the right of way to and from such prospect places or mines , and for the convenient and proper operation of such prospect places , mines and for roads and approaches thereto or for removal therefrom of coal, mineral, machinery or other material; also to maintain and operate its railroad in its present form of construction and to make any change in the form of construction or method of operation of said Railroad, as reserved by Union Pacific Railroad Company in the Deed to Benjamin F. Twombly, recorded May 4 , 1900 in Book 178 at Page 322 , and any interests therein or rights thereunder . B . Ireland Ditch , and any and all rights of way therefore , as evidenced by Map and Statement filed January 13 , 1916 as Reception No. 224014 insofar as the same may affect subject property. (Affects SWa NWq and W1 SW; . ) 9 . Ireland Reservoir No. 4 , and any and all rights of way therefore , as evidenced by Map and Statement filed October 26 , 1920 as Reception No. 337414 , insofar as the same may affect subject property. (Affects W1 of the W1) w ple FORM NO. C-6OOO-3C TOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10-17-70) FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM B-1970 (AMENDED 10-17.70) Cop y SCHEDULE B—Continued 10 . Right of way for public highway , as granted to Weld County , Colorado , by Mrs. B. F. Twombly in the instrument recorded March 25 , 1931, in Book 911 at Page 62 , affecting the following described property : A Strip of ground being 10 feet wide , it being all of the South 10 feet of the North 40 feet of Section 7 . 11. Right of way for a public highway, as granted to Weld County , Colorado, by Margaret May Twombly in the instrument recorded June 19 , 1951, in Book 1305 at Page 459 , affecting the following described property : A tract or parcel of land in the N1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P .M. , in Weld County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows : Beginning as the Northwest corner of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West; 1. thence along the West line of Section 7 , S00 °05 ' E , a distance of 39 . 0 feet; 2. thence N89°36 ' E, a distance of 1182. 1 feet; 3 . thence S71°24 ' E , a distance of 249 . 0 feet; 4 . thence N66 °16 ' E, a distance of 50 . 7 feet; 5. thence N89°36 ' E, a distance of 950 . 0 feet; 6. thence N75°34 ' E, a distance of 206 . 2 feet; 7 . thence N89 °36 ' E, a distance of 300 . 0 feet; �1fr. 8 . thence N83° 19 ' 30"E, a distance of 100 . 6 feet; 9 . thence N89 °36 ' E, a distance of 1100 . 0 feet; 10 . thence 589°49 ' 3011E , a distance of 100 . 0 feet; 11. thence N89°36 ' E, a distance of 715 . 1 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal. 12. thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of the Denver Hudson Canal, N32°35 'W, a distance of 47 . 3 feet, to the North line of Section 7 ; 13. thence along the West line of Section 7 , S89 °36 'W, a distance of 4903 . 8 feet, more or less to the point of beginning 12 . Right of way to construct, operate, maintain, change or remove its electric transmission and/or distribution lines , with all poles , cross arms , cables , wires , guys , supports , fixtures and devices , used or useful in the operation of said line through and along a course as said line may be hereafter constructed in, through, over and across the N1 of Section 7 , Township 1 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. Together with the right to enter upon said premises , survey, construct, maintain , operate, control and use said transmission line and to remove objects inter- fering therewith, and the right to permit the attachment of wires of any other Company as conveyed to Colorado Central Power Company , by Margaret Twombly in the instrument recorded February 20 , 1952 in Book 1324 at Page 174 , affecting the following described property : ( 1) One pole and one anchor approximately 1450 feet East and approximately 103 feet South of the Northwest corner of said section . (This pole and anchor to be 68 feet South of State Highway 52 Right-of-Way . ) ( 2) One anchor 135 feet South of the North ; corner of said section . (This anchor to be aoproximt,mly it feet South of State Hiclhmiay 52) - -FORM NO. C•6OOO-3C FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 (AMENDED 10-17-70) FOR USE WITH COLORADO REGION AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY-FORM E-1970 (AMENDED 10-17.70) SCHEDULE B—Continued 13. Terms , agreements , provisions , conditions and obligations as contained in Surface Owners Agreement between Margaret May Twombly, Della Louise Griffith, Lena Marie Twombly Apel and Union Pacific Railroad Company, recorded April 2, 1971 in Book 643 , as Reception No. 1565010 . 14 . Deed of Trust from ; Lloyd Land to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of Philip T. Apel, B . T. Griffith , Velena Eggleston and Virginia Steele to secure . $53, 750. 00 dated - December 1 , 1983 recorded December 6 , 1983 in Book 1014 as Reception No . 1949157 C.044)0, COp�, f JUDITH L . HAMILTON Consulting Geologist and Engineer G R O U N D - WATER AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 2951 Curtis Street • Denver, Colorado • 80205 • (303 ) 296_94G7 March 22, 1985 Mr. James Erger Leeper & Co. 7290 Magnolia Street Commerce City, CO 80022 Dear Mr, Erger : Enclosed is my report on the engineering geologic conditions for the Twombly Panch Subdivision in Section 7 , T1N, E64'W, Weld County, Colorado. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, � 1 � ,-2 / . fi ' Judith L. Hamilton Ir bkj JUDITH L . HAMILTON Consulting Geologist and Engineer GROUND - WATER AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 2951 Curtis Street • Denver, Colorado • 80205 • (303) 296_9467 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC REPORT SECTION 7, TIN, P64W WELD COUNTY, COLORADO March 22, 1985 INTRODUCTION At the request of Mr. James Erger, I studied engineering geologic conditions for the Twombly Panch property comprising all of Section 7, TlN, P64W, Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of my investiga- tions was to determine if any geologic conditions exist which would adversely affect the proposed development . my investigations inclu- ded a review of geologic and hydrologic literature on the site area, study of well records from the State Engineer ' s Office, review of records of oil and gas wells in the vicinity from the State Oil and Gas Commission files , and a field inspection of the site. I understand that 12 lots ranging in size from 40 to 73 acres in _size each , and 1 lot 2. 6 acres in size, are currently planned for the property, and that individual wells and sewage disposal systems are proposed. CONCLUSIONS 1. The site is suitable for the proposed development from an eng- ineering geologic standpoint provided the items enumerated below are taken into account. 2. Some of the soils , and any claystone bedrock encountered, are likely to be swelling. Also, the loessial soils may settle upon wetting. It is strongly recommeded that individual soils investiga- tions be made at the location of each proposed structure, and that the foundations be designed by a qualified soils engineer. 3. It is anticipated that ground water levels and bedrock on at least some location on each lot will be at or below a depth of 10 feet below ground surface to permit the installation of conventional leaching fields. Sn order to assure that this is the case at each proposed leaching field site , a test boring to a depth of at least 10 feet should be made at the location, in addition to the usual Percolation test holes. 4. No structures should be permitted within the confines of the 100- Year flood plain of Box Elder Creek unless facilities are installed to raise the base of the structure above this flood level . Although higher flood stages are unlikely, there is a possibility of flooding of land outside the 100-year boundary, and it is advisable to place any structures well outside these limits as a precautionary measure. In addition, structures on Lots 9 , 10 and 11 should he placed at least 100 feet away from the tributary stream channels on those lots . 5. No minerals which could be economically mined at present are known to exist on the property; however, there is a possibility that gas may exist in the J sands underlying the property. LESCRTPTION OF THE SITE The property is located about 2 miles east of the town of Hudson on the south side of State Highway 52 between Weld County Roads 49 and 51. Weld County Road No. 10 lies on the south boundary of the pro- Perty; however, this road is not passable at present at this loca- tion because the bridge over Pox Elder Creek is washed out. The land is flat to gently rolling, with the flatter lands being on the west side of the Creek and the rolling lands generally on the east side. iRox Elder Creek flows northward through the property, entering near the south quarter-corner and exiting about 1150 feet from the northwest corner of the property. -Ireland Reservoir No. 4 occupies the south half of the creek valley on the property, however, the dam has been washed out on the west side of the spillway and the reservoir 2 is no longer operative. An old canal line runs northward from the west end of the -dam. The Denver-Hudson Canal , which was flowing at the time of my inspection on March 19 , 1985, traverses the ex- treme northeast corner of the property. Elevation of the property ranges from approximately 4943 feet where Box Elder Creek exits the property to 5041' at the northeast corner of the site (see Figure 1 ) . The property is presently used for cropland in the eastern portion , and pasture or vacant land in the creek bottom and on the west side of the creek. The land is treeless except for some shrubs and bushes along the northern part of the creek bottom. No houses are presently located on the property, although a house formerly stood in the north- west corner, where the old hand-dug well still exists but has been partially filled in with trash. A few scattered farmhouses and related buildings are located in the vicinity. SOILS AND GEOLOGY Soils on the property have been mapped by Crabb of the Soil Conser- vation Service primarily as Colby-Adena loam, Shingle-Renohill com- plex, and Weld loam in the eastern part of the property, and Colby loam, Nunn loam and Weld loam , with small areas of other soils , in the western part. Locations of the soil groups are shown on Figure 1 , and characteristics of the soils are given on Table 1 . Engineer- ing properties and classifications are given on Table 2 and the phy- sical and chemical properties of the soils are given on Table 3. The information given in these tables is for general use only and should not be substituted for individual on-site foundation investi- gations. Smith , Schneider and Petri indicate that the depth to bedrock on the 3 property is about 20 feet in the extreme northeast corner and about 20 to 40 feet in the western quarter :of the property, but could be up to about 50 feet locally. The depth to bedrock in the southeastern portion is not known, but _could be considerably less. The western portion of the property is mapped by Smith, Schneider and Petri as Quaternary alluvium. They map the bedrock on the eastern half of the property as -Tertiary—Cretaceous undifferentiated (see Fig- ure 1) , but -Robson, Romero and Zawistowski show it as Arapahoe for- mation. This consists of a series of alternating claystones , silt- stones and sandstones. SWELLING SOILS Although some of the soils are non-swelling, the existence of numer- ous cracks in the surface soils and the existence of some clays of high plasticity indicate that swelling soils should be anticipated on the property. In addition, many of the soils are loessial in nature, and the loose soils structure may collapse when wetted and loaded. Because of the variability likely in soil conditions , it is strongly advised that individual foundation borings be made at the location of each structure, and that the foundations be designed by a qualified soils engineer on the basis of tests from these holes. If swelling soils are encountered , care should be taken in landscap- ing and maintenance to keep water away from the foundations to mini- mize damage potential. LEACHING FIELDS No percolation tests have been made to date on the site , but owing to the large size of the lots it is highly likely that a suitable location can be found on each lot . Even wher-e percolation test re- sults are satisfactory, however, shallow depth to bedrock or ground 4 water could make conventional leaching fields unsuitable. When test holes are drilled for foundation investigations , at least one test hold should be drilled at the proposed leaching _field site to a min- imum of 10 feet below ground surface. The water level should be measured several days after drilling. If bedrock or ground water do exist within 10 feet of the ground surface, either the leaching field should be relocated or an engineered disposal system should be installed. FLOODING Flooding of portions of the property has occurred in recent years. In the 1965 flood , water level was above road level on Hwy 52. The reservoir washed out in 1965 and 1978 and again several years ago ; however, I understand that even in the 1965 flood the water did not approach the 100-year flood line in the northwest corner of the pro- Perty. No aerial photographs of the 1965 flood in this area could be located to confirm this. The limits of the 100-year flood plain are shown on Figure 3. Highway 52 crosses Box Elder Creek on a concrete box culvert about 20 feet long, however, the Colorado Highway Dept. has no information on the design flood of this culvert. The culvert for the tributary stream crossing near the lot 10-lot 11 line has been partially filled in and should be repaired to permit water to flow through it more readily. -The danger of flooding on Lots 9 through 13 is very minimal provided no structures are placed within 100 feet of the tributary streams on lots 9, 10 and 11. Adequate land exists outside the boundaries of the 100-year floodplain on Lots 3 through 8 to permit building outside this limit ; however, on Lots 1 and 2 pads may need to be 2 built to raise the base of the structure above flood-plain elevation, or some other protective measures would need to be taken. Purchasers of the property should bear in mind that floods greater than the 100- year flood , although unlikely, may occur, and that additional protec- tive measures may be necessary. Flooding on the property in the past has probably been accentuated by washing out of the reservoir embankment. It the dam is reconstruc- ted , it must be properly engineered, designed, and constructed to minimize the potential for failure. MINE AL RESOURCES Coal Coal underlies the property in the -Laramie formation. A log from W25 reported in Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 78-8 shows coal from 425-432' , 471-479 ' , and 487-492' , with possible coal from 505-507' , 545-547' , and 592-594' . This is too deep for surface mining and it is unlikely that underground mining would be used be- cause of the expense. However, there is a possibility that in-situ gasification would be utilized. Oil and Gas. No oil or gas wells are located on the property. The Amoco #1 UPRR 52 hole was drilled in the SE4SE+ of the property, but it was dry and was plugged and abandoned. The nearest operating wells are the Berge #1 Ringsby gas well in the CNW+ of Section 12 and theRingsby #2 well in the SE4NE4 of Section 12, T1N , R65W. They produce from the J sand ; however , first production was in late 1984 and no data on production are currently on file in the Oil and Gas Commission. The Macey Mershon #1 Flanagan well in the NE4NE+ of Section 6, T1N, R64W began production in June 1981 from the J sand and through 1984 had produced 47, 645 MCF of gas and 442 bbls condensate. 6 It is not known at present whether economic amounts of oil or gas underlie the property. Sand and Gravel - Schwochow et al map an area near the north central part of the section as terrace deposits and the remaining area west of the creek as valley fill deposits , all with a potential but une- valueated resource (see Figure 1) . The log -from well 22120 in the NE+SE4 Section 12, T1N, R65W, indicates gravel from 2?-38 feet , and the log for well 13412F in the NW4NW4. Section 18, T1N, R64W shows red gravel 36-52' . The log for well 32642 in the SWSE4 of Section 6 T1N, R64W shows sand and gravel 0 to 43' . However, a study made by Woodward-Thorfinnson and Assoc , Inc . , on Box Elder Creek upstream (T3S , R65W) indicates that the material is primarily sand with too high a fine content to meet concrete fine-aggregate specifications . At the subject loction, the gravel appears to be deeply buried. In addition, mining of sand in the Box Elder Creek valley would serious- ly interrupt ground-water flow, and might result in increased evap- oration which would decrease downstream water rights. Abundant sand of better quality is found in numerous other -locations. It is there- fore my opinion that mining of sand and gravel on the property would be uneconomic. OTHER GEOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS Some of the soils have moderate to high corrosion risk for unpro- tected metal pipe (see Table 3) . Protection should be provided when buried iron or steel pipe is installed to minimize corrosion risk. Numerous alkali deposits are found along the drainageways , indicat- ing a high alkalinity of soils or surface water. In these areas , 7 growing of lawns end gardens may be difficult. The Agricultural Extension Service should be consulted regarding any difficulties with vegetation. The hand-dug well in the northwest corner of the property should be repaired and protected from contamination, or else should be filled in and abandoned. No other geologic conditions which would adversely affect the pro- posed development are known to exist on the Troperty. Respectfully submitted v• • • GGLGtiI. [ i Z C i . r (.;Judith L. Hamilton, P. 'r' 7.1 1. Engineering Geologist X4;9 a.'*A;, e. , � March 22, 1985 8 • REFERENCES Crabb , James A. , 1980. Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part. USDA Soil Conservation Service. Kirkham, R.M. 1978. Location Map of Drill Holes Used for Coal Evaluation in the Denver and Cheyenne Basins , Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Open—File Report 78-8. Robson , S.G. , Romero, John C. , and Zawistowski, Stanley, 1981. Geo- logic Structure , Hydrology, and Water Quality of the Arapahoe Aqui- fer in the Denver Basin, Colorado. US Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-647. Schwochow, S .D. , Shroba, R.R. and Wicklein, P. C. 1974. Atlas of Sand , Gravel and Quarry Aggregate Resources of the Colorado Front Range Counties , Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication 5-P. Smith , Rex 0. , Schneider, Paul A. Jr. , and Petri , Lester R. , 1964. Ground-Water Resources of the South Platte River Basin in Western Adams and Southwestern Weld Counties , Colorado. US Geological Sur- vey !Water Supply Paper 1658. US Army Corps of Engineers , 1967. Report on the Floods of June , 1965, South Platte River Basin, Colorado and Nebraska. US Government , Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1982. Flood Insurance Rate Map, Weld Countu, Colorado, Unincorporated Area , Panel 1025C. 7 . __ . .....-- s°s 7- i-R ,„ • , (---7: - is , ; . ( 1 r.Ct /�•� „.2 C P fdi o .� `� 1� " 8) (7 \\ .,o Fbbut twat /i . aye .�� _ _ Wdl se. 1 !� 1 n /`/:\� O 1016 tee0 Scale of feet EXPLANATION T4 Terrace deposits, unevaluated potential resource V4 Valley-fill deposits, unevaluated potential resource (From Schwochow et al, Colo. Geol. Survey Sp. Publ. *5-B, Keenesburg sheet) Qal Quaternary alluvium (interbedded clay, silt, sand and gravel) TKu Tertiary-Cretaceous bedrock, undifferentiated (From Smith, Schneider and Petri, USGS WSP 1658) LOCATION AND GEOLOGIC MAP TWOMBLY RANCH SECTION 7, TIN, R64W FIGURE 1 1174, ''.MV ) ' '' " 5 11I 1 3 �/� 1 M \ do) cJew r ,8. Ipt '� Al it> tole too EXPLANATION 4 Aquools and Aquepts, flooded Scale of feet 10 Bankard sandy loam 0-3% slopes 15 Colby loam 1-3% slopes 18 Colby-Adena loans 3-9% slopes 25 HHaverson loam 10-1% slopes 26 Haverson loam 1-3% slopes 36 Midway-Shingle Complex 5-20% slopes 40 Nunn loam 1-3% slopes 47 Olney fine sandy loam 1-3% slopes 53 Otero sandy loam 5-9% slopes 60 Shingle-Renohill Comples 3-9% slopes 69 Valent sand 0-3% slopes 78, Weld loam 0-1% slopes 79 Weld loam 1-3% slopes • Source: Crabb, Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part, USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1980 SOIL MAP TWONELY RANCH SECTION 7, T1N, R64W WELD COUNTY, COLORADO FIGURE 2 t, .e R f j + agent�Y n.;, 6 \ 34�i' 11-> as 1 ...1 e ar4„.., ',id' `� 5.N. 52 i r . s Al 'j' 's`;. ,, .j:_ Twon b/ , (� Way •,',(. Dan . pNn t Ik' et Sub omen ''I. Y J(iFgl t ��I�N/ ICI rat': •••• �JI O t •Y4.4 so tut;,I l� S! i Q1 qy +2 t-Wd- 4 ,1 V . .y't� V — i .1 tz .c am _ \\ ' q{ I.k1 s .,x,?-V-: j l ! ' i} yy 4 %r.gba.v A r i Ci, *von tipr ty �Y L ... LS- Y , 1a } Y ir'• 44i. 4 -. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Weld County, Colorado, Unincorporated Area 1025C EXTENT OF FLOOD-PLAIN (100-YEAR FLOOD) FIGURE 3 ] / • 3o LTLI 44 } }\ 3 3 ) } 3 3 3 33 3 )\ O , O § u 444 \ { \ j \HI 3 \ §\ •) )re sa ca LH \ O \ 3 3 3 rtf E � « , m m E § ± : 2 \ ] j ) \ \ \ . . • V ,3 \ H 0 • 0 V• • 3 a 3 3 tv / / . 7 ) ) j ) V Q ) • • / 7 2 ; . } ~ EV \ C I I = # ) I / c \ j j x § Ga ; w2 k re 0 / m ) § ] j w ` [ t 44 44 44 44 § 0.1 HI HI \ m 2 > ; V12 « 4 0. L.0 a a R L4 I LO e , a Q CO 4-1 4-1 | | ! * :O « ) { _ : ) \ _ ) [ = [{ � j \ 0CI ; / B q ! � e e . § « a ) ± O . ) ) ` ) � / ) � ) ° \ ) ) a 41) VO} O HI r OI eI inI . � , rI o CI \ cu Eo ori 5 ) ) 2 » r » » a itIC , » f >1 amen H . C) f 0 H V } 4,+1 ; f c m�}� ® j v /i a ■ 2 • e { , ® / » H C ^ O - ] A « f ) _ § C C XZC ; IX CMI- . A cn } g. V \ A \ _ ( /{ � g \ \ asp O o a j ] r ° Z 0 0 \ � \ } } U ` � , vi a EN a en _ _ VI m m CO N R \ TAPLE ,3.i: ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFIO; NS (The symbol ( means less than; > means greater than. Absence of an entry means data were not estimated] Classification F'raPercent--- e ss — 3oi1 name ani froth; USDA texture -- — _-- t a nmbei F— —r-- passing , ;ments sieve number-- r symbol UnifiedAA.51ITO > 3 r-- --- Liquid Plas- llmit ticity Index ; -- ---- .__- _ . _ ,inches 4 10 40 index In r __.._T 200 _ _ —_ - - , Pct �' —r_--r_— ----Pct --__ , , Ape 11s 0-60 Variable _ An inpt s "_rrn_ Variable 10 5-3 _ _ O 0 anka r�l 4-SO; in SP-5M, SM;A- , ;Sandy m sand, sand, A-41 0 195-100;90-100;60-70 30-4H0 --- NP Gravelly sand 0-5 ;70-100;60-100;40-70 5-25 --- NP . A1, A-1 Colby 0-7 ;Loam CL-ML ;A-4 0 100 ; 100 _ 7-60;Silt loam, loam, CL-M1. ;A_4 90-100; 85-100 25-30 ; 5-10 o oo " 100 ;go-loo 85-loo 25-30 5-10 very fine sandy loam. Adena 0-6 Loam - ' ML ;A-4 0 ; 100 100 6-9 Clay, clay loam, CFI, CL IA-6, A-7 0 100 100 90-100,70-90 20-30 NP-5 95-100;80-90 35-60 15-35 silty clay loam. 9-60 Loam, silt loam, ML A-4 0 ; 100 100 90-100;75-90 120-30 , NP-5 very fine sandy loam. • ' ;Loam ;ML, CL-ML,A-4 . 0 ' 95-100;80-100 75-90 150-60 f; 20-30 NP-10 Have' n ; 4-60;Stratified clay IML, CL-MI.;A-4 0 : 95-100175-100 75-90 ;50-60 ; 20-30 NP-10 __, loam to sand , . midway 0-111Clay 0 100 I0U 9 -- _, Weathert ' 13 . 7'1-100 ) 95 45. 60 20-35 ___ bedrock . • .>. . _ _n1,,,to 0-5 Loam ' - CL-ML ;A-V 0-18 Clay loam, loam CL ' 005 ;75-100 75-100 70-95 50-80 25-35 ; 0-10 18 ;Unweathered :A-6__ 0 :75-100 75-100 65-100 50-80 30-40 10-20 bedrock. • 40 9 ;Loam -__ Nunn - 0- 3 , 0- ;CL, SC ;A-6 , 0-5 " ;95-100;80-95 70-95 4 • 9-29;C1ay loam, clay ;CL, CH ;A-6; A-7; 0-5 ;95-1005-75 , 35-60 ; 10-20 29-60;Clay loam, loam, ;CL, ;A_4 , 9 100 85-95 65-75 135-60 ; 20-35 I sandy loam. CL-ML, ; A_ 0-5 ;80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 ; 75-40 5-20 6, SM-SC, 1 A-2 SC 46, 47, 48 0-10;Fine sandy loam ,'SM IA-2 Olney I1-20;Sandy clay loam ;SC, CL ;A_6 0 0 ,95-100 90-100 75-115;95-100 90-100 70-95 ;20-55 ; I0-20 N0-5 21-25:Sandy loam, ;SC, IA-4, A-6 '00;35-55 ; 20-35 10-20 1 :95-100 95-100 75-95 ;35-SS ; 20-35 5-15 I sandy clay ; SM-SC, ' loam, fine 1 CL, sandy loam. CL-ML 25-60;Fine sandy loam, ;SM ;A-2 0 70-95 ;20- 195-100 95-100 loamy fine35 --- NP sand. - r. ._. . I .,-r.-. . ., 50, '.I , 52, 53 0-12;Sand loam 10 Y ISM ;A-2 ; 0-I 195-100575-100 50-80 120-35 ; --- HP Otero 12-60:Sandy loam, finelSM ;A-2, A-1 , 0-1 )90-100 50-100 40-80 ;20-35 ; --- NP sandy loam, gravelly sandy loam. 1 ,•tngle 0-6 LLoam ;CL-ML lA_y is 1 0-68 Clay loam, loam ;CL 0-5 ,75-100 75-100;70-95 ;55-75 25-35 ; 5-10 18 ;Unweathered :A-6 0 ;75-100 75-100;65-100;50-80 30-40 10-20 , bedrock ___ __ 4 enohill - 0-9 ;Clay loam ,CL ,'A-6 - ' 0 ;85-100 80-100;80- 4-32:Clay, clay loam ;CL, CH ;A-7, A-6; 0 • ;95- 0-90 ;75-95 25-40 10-20 1.00 90-100; 100;75-95 35-65 20-35 32 •" ;Weathered _ 9 bedrock. TABLE a.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLA,SIFICATIONS--Continued C1assi fi c_n Lia i_ _; at, Percentage passing 7.,11�il name and Depth USDA texture me g- ___ sieve number-- _ Liquid Plan- _ map symbol , Unified AASHTO > 3 limit ticit inches, 4 10 ; 40 index In Pct r . _ 200 ,r___ -'-T- .... - __. Pct 1 y, 70 0-8 ;Fine sand ;SM A-7 0 100 100 ;80-95 10-30 --- NP Valent 8-60;Fine sand , sand ,SP-SM, SM A-2, A-3i 0 100 95-100:75-90 5-20 --- NP 78, 79, 80 0-8 ;Loam -- - - - - -- "— , eid :ML, A-4 0 100 95-100;85-100 60-85 120-30 NP-10 I CL-ML 8-15:Silty clay loam, ;CL A-6, A-71 0 100 100 '95-100 85-95 ; 15-50 15-30 I silt.y clay. 15-60;Si1t loam, loam ;CL-ML, CL A-4, A-6 ; 0 . 100 95-100;85-100 60-95 ; 20-35 5- i5• • See map unit description for the composition and behavior of t-he map unit. l • • Source: Crabb, Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Tart, USDA Soil _Conservation Service, 1980 Table 12 This information is of a general nature only and should not be substituted for individual, on-site foundation investigations TABLE ia,.-- .ICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS -he symbol < means less than; > means greater _.hen. The erosion tolerance factor (T) is for the entire profile. Absence of an entry means data were not available or were not estimated] , Risk__or _corrosion _-Erosion ejnd Soil name and Depth; Perinea- Available Soil Salinity; Shrink- - �-- -- - ; factors erodi- map symbol -bility water reaction ; swell ;Uncoated Concrete ; bility capacity _ _ ;potential ; steel 'in/nK ; T group In In/-hr In/in NI Mmhos/cm: _ ___ ___ . que{4 s' 10-60 ___ ___ ___ ___ ; C _ .. _ ` _ _ 0-Y 2.0-6.0 0.09-0. 12 7.4_8.4 <2 ;Low... --_ Lo_ _._. w Moderate ;Low ,0. 10 5 a 5nkard 4-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 7,4-8.4 ; <2 Lou Moderate ;Low ;0. 10 15, 16, 17----- 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0,24 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate ;Low ;0, 3r 5 yl ?lby 7-54 0.6-2.0 0. 17-0.22 7.4-8.4 '7 ' Low Mod PI'-It_e ;Low ;n. i7 alby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2 :L ow Moderate L ;0. 57 5 4L 7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Low Moderate ;Low ;0. 57 lena 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.18-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 ;Low ;Moderate ;Low ;0. 1-/ 5 6-9 0.06-0.2 0. 16-0. 18 6.6-7.8 <2 ;High ;High ;Low :O. ?4 ._ _..._ ._ 9-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 42 ;Low ;High ;I.ow ;O. i' 26 0-9 0,6-2.0 0. 14-0, 18 6.6-8.4 <8 ;Low ;014.h II ,,,, --- verson ; 4-60 0.6-2.0 0. 14-0.18 7.4-8.4 <9 ;Low ;high :10a idway 0-13 0.06-0.2 0. 12-0.17 7.9-9.0 2-8 ;High ; High H 13 -- --- P :Law 0.43 i single 0-6 0.6-2.0 ;0. 76-0. 18 7.4-9.0 <2 :Low High ;Low 0. 32; 2 4L 6-18 0.6-2.0 ;0: 16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2 ;Moderate ;High ;Low ,18 0. 19' 40, 41 , 112 0-9 : 0.2 2.0 ;0. 155-0.20; 6.6-7.8 ; <2 Moderate ;Moderate ;Low 0.24; 5 6 i am 19-29;0.06-0.6 ;0. 15-0. 18; 7.-4-8.4 ; <2 High ;High :Low 0.28; ;29-60' 0.2-2.0 ;0. 10-0. 18; 7.4-8.4 I <2 Moderate ;High ;Low 0.24; 47, 49 : 0-70; 0.6-6.0 ;0. 11-0.15, 6.6-7.8 I <2 Low ;Moderate ;Low 0. '" - i oey ; 10-20; 0.6-2.0 ;0. 13-0. 15; 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate ;high ;Low 0.?4 ; :20-25; 0.6-6.0 ;0. 11-0. 15; 7.9-B.4 <2 Low ;High ;Low ;0,24; ;25-60; 2.0-6.0 ;0.06-0. 13; 7.9-8.4 <2 Low ;High ;Low-----'0..'n; 51 , 52, 53 1 0-12; 6.0-20 ;0.09-0. 13; 7.4-8.4 <2 Low ;high ;Low ;0. 10; 5 2 ero ; 12-60; 6.0-20 ;0.08-0.12; .5.4-8.4 <4 Lou :High ;Low ;0. 70; single : 0-6 : 0.6-2.0 ;0. 16-0. 18 7.9-9.0 ; <2 Low ;High ;Low ;0.32; 2 ; 4L 6-18i 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 ; <2 Moderate ;High ;Low ;0.49; .18 , noh111 0-9 : 0.2-4,6 ;0. 17-0.21 , 6.6-7.8 <2 ;-Moderate !High :Low 0.37:; 9-32;0.06_0-,2 ;0. 14_0. 16; 6.6-8.4 <2 ;High ;High ;Low 0.32; 3 6 n,/ 0-8 6.0-20 ,0.07-0.12; 6.6-7.9 --- Low Low ;Lou 0.10; 5 1 51 'nt 8 60; 6.0=20 ;0.05-0. 10; 6.6-7.8 , (2 Low Low ;Low 0. 10; 8,'9, 80 I0-8 10.6-2.0 ;0. 16-0.21 6.6-7.3 <2 ;Low Low Low 0.32; 5 6 a4 ; 8-15;0.06-0.2 ;0. 19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 ;High Moderate Low 0.281 115-60; 0.6-2.0 .;0.16-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 ;Low High Low 0.28; • See map unit description for the composition and behavi:,r ;f the map unit . Source: Crabb, Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part, USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1980, Table 13 This information is of a general nature only and should not be substituted for individual, 'on site investigations McRAE & SHORT, INC. 1227 8th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Telephone (303) 356-3101 Engineering, Surveying, Planning & Land Development August 2, 1984 Department of Planning Services PROJECT NO. 84001 915 - 10th Street Greeley , Color-ado 80631 RE: TWOMBLY RANCH P.U.D. SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE -6th P.M, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Gentlemen: We have reviewed the Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey with regards to this area. Their analysis of the soils materials within the area is "poor to unsuited" for sand and gravel . The area is overlain with about 60 inches of loam, silty loam and sandy loam. The topsoil is rated "good". The "Resource Map" at the _County Planning Office indicates that the area West of Box Sider Creek is "Valley Fill " with the -gravel resource unevaluated. The area East of Box Elder Creak shows no gravel resource. An area of 35 to 40 Acres along the creek at the North end -of the Section has been classified as T4 - a Stream Terrace Deposit with a proba-ble gravel respurce. These sources , lack of previous mining, the limited area and location would indi - cate a minimal possibility -of an economically -mineable gravel resource on the tract. The Soil Conservati-on Service,Soil Survey indicates "slight to moderate" consider- ations for septic systems and leach fields. -Given the variety of soils in the area arid the size of the tracts , it would be my judgement that -suitable sanitary sewer systems can be designed for each lot. Department of Planning Services August 2, 1984 PROJECT NO. 84001 RE: TWOMBLY RANCH P.U.D. SECTION 7 , TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, -RANGE 64 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO A portion of the P.U.D. lies within the 100-Year Flood Plain according to flood Insurance Rate Map - Community Panel No. 08026-6-1025 C, dated September 28, 1982 and prepared by the Feder-al Emergency Management Agency (See P.U.D. Plan) . This area adjoins Box Elder -Creek and . is designated as Zone A - Base Flood Elevation not determined. All prnposed lots, except Lots 2 and 3, have en adequate building site outside of the -designated Flood Plain. A minimum 100' X 100' building pad will be constructed on Lots 2 and 3 to an -elevation one loot (1' ) above the antiripated flood level prior to sale. These pads will adjoin County Road 49 and be at the edge of the flood plain , causing negligible interference in the flow. The building permit process will verify compliance with the Flood Plain _Overlay regulations on these two lots . There are no other overlay districts affecting the P.U.D. Respectfully, eel 7FI......�1/4c McRae & Short, Inc. '*t• 661-6 c.12(7-z-eKS • Gerald B. McRae, ProT'essional Engineer and ��F.F (11.\- 'p°`o` Land Surveyor, _O-olorado Reg. No. 6616 'ZOF.p,0po` 2 SOIL SURVEY OF Vl _3 COUNTY, COLOR-AC ., SOUTHERN PART United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.z re, in cooperation with the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station 44 44 r� 10 � 4 \ t . :S fi • 60 v { 49 rl s __ �. • , • i 18 *8 16 tiph • 1 ;„�; 25 �,� y� r.i -,4 } ;,pat..;; .�. ;Y, €,' 6 . 49 ITtilic:i '..4...a 18 • ]8 ill . e �; 5 18 ;18 • ! r % is 79 la ' 4.44- 1! I ° w ` , r a aM�. C ah Y $ 75 r +_ j --!& 1 t •� II • '#1 P�:1 III 1 1 Y, y d. , 1 11 r II R 1 t ..... tq," ; rt:'* � 'f r l"4. " w� 44'lilt a�i '+' it . "q . 7D {{��,,r iPt. ^ p A6.� �v4. • ab� I �}}y•yll eZ { iy • " r r« '1fi C �b ,rr Kr A a s rk. :14/. ire c•i w •f fi �1146 "r5 �. b'`�r� Y, �I" �.. . f ll1 ,. cep ---, ^ . t• ` . e•I. etci ', 'V:.'� i`�' �17 4., .a' TW0MBLY RANCH 10 r M.; I � , l,, gy ° Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 4PJ : lit , 1 1 tl � 1t� I � �•. tr " f 64 West of the 6th P.M. ,, Held tv a9 .jf. a L' , v ` � 1 {' • County, Colorado. FI :5 1 £34001 3. Weld-Colby Deep, nearly level to moderately sloping, well drained foams formed in calcareous eolian deposits This nearly level to moderately sloping map unit is on * Soils with major ocrurance, plains mainly in the southeastern part of the survey area. detailed information included. One small area is in the west-central part. The unit makes up about 10 percent of the total acreage. About 50 per- cent is Weld soils, 35 percent is Colby soils, and 15 per- cent is soils of minor extent. 1 Soils with minor occurrence, Weld soils occupy the broad nearly level areas. Colby detailed information not soils occupy the steeper side -slopes. Weld soils have a included. loam surface layer and a clay and clay loam subsoil. Colby soils have a loam surface layer and silt loam underlying material. Minor in this unit are the well drained Adena and Kim soils. This map unit is used mainly for cropland. About 65 percent is nonirrigated. Winter wheat is the principal crop. If irrigated, the soils are well suited to all commonly grown crops. The potential is fair for development of openland wildlife habitat. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL LEGEND SYMBOL NAME SYMBOL NAME 1 Altvan loam.0 to I percent slopes 44 Olney loamy sand, I to 3 percent slopes 2 /Oven loam. 1 to 3 percent slopes 3 Aquolls and AOuents,gravelly substratum 46 Olney loamy sand,3 to 5 percentet slopes Olney tine sandy l• 4 Aquolls and A9uepts,Hooded oam.0 l0 3 percent slopes 5 Ascalon sandy loam, I to 3 percent slopes 47 Olney tine sandy loam. 1 la 3 percent slopes 6 Ascalon sandy loam,3 to 5 percent slopes 48 Olney sa sandy lo3 p 3c In 5l s slopes 7 Ascalon sandy loam, 49 Osgood sand.0 3 perc pen slopes 8 -Au aeon loam.0 to 1 percent slopes slopes SO Otero sandy loam.0 to I percent slopes 9 Ascalon loam. 1 to 3 percent slopes 51 Otero sandy loam. I to 3 percent slopes 52 Otero sandy loam.3 to 5 percent slopes • 10 Bankard sandy loans 0 t 3 percent slopes 53 Otero sandy loam.5 to 9 percent slopes 11 Presser sandy loam,0 to I percent slopes 54 0 12 Bresser sandy loam. I to 3 percent slopes 55 Paoh loam,Paoli loam. to I percent slopes I to 3 percent slopes 13 Castel()gravelly sandy loam,5 to_20 percent slopes 56 Renohlll clay loam.O to 3 pert ent slopes 14 Colby loam 0 to 1 percent slopes 57 Renohlll clay loam,3 to 9 percent slopes 14-15 Colby loam. 1 to 3 percent slopes 16 Colby loam,3 to 5 percent slopes 58 11 Colby loam.5 to 9_percent slopes 5Shingle loam, I to 3 percent slopes .%4-18 Colby Admix loamy,3 to 9 percent slopes • 60 Shingle-Ren06ill 0 Shingle loam,il to 9 percent lex. slopesPe 19 Colombo clay loam,0 to 1 percent slopes ompe. 3 to 9 percent Slopes 20 Colombo clay loam, I to 3 percent slopes 6I Tassel fine sandy loam 5 to 20 percent slopes 21 62 Terry tine sandy loam.0 to 3 percent slopes Dacono clay loam,0 to 1 percent slopes 63 Terry tine sandy loam .3 to 9 perrere slopes 21 Dacono clay loam.1 to 3 percent slopes 64 Thedalund loam. 1 to 3 pen wit Slopes 65 Thedalund loam.3 10 9 percent slopes 23 foil Collins loam,0 to I percent slopes 24 Fort Collins loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 66 Ulm clay loam.0 to 3 percent slopes 25 iiaverson loam,0 to I percent slope 67 Ulm clay loam,3 to 5 pen ent slopes 68 Ushc iornorthents.moderately sleep J 26 -Meyerson loam, 1 to 3 percent slopef 27 meld(silty clay. 1 to-3 percent slopes • 69 Valent sand,0 to 3 percent slooes 28 Melds silty clay.3 to 5 percent slopes 70 Valent sand.3 to 9 percent slopes 29 Julesburg sandy loam.0 to I percent slopes 71 ValentLoup complex.0 to 9 percent slopes Vona loamy Sand.0 to 3 percent slopes 30 Julesburg sandy loam. I to 3 percent slopes 73 Vona loamy sand.3 to 5 per(enl slopes J4 Vona loamy sand.5 to 9 percent slopes 31 Kim loam,0 to I percent slopes )5 Vona sandy loam.0 to 1 percent slopes 32 Kim loam. I to 3 percent slopes 76 Vona sandy loam. 1 to 3 percent slopes 33 Kim loam.3 to 5 percent slopes 77 34 Kim loam.5 to 9 percent slopes Vona sandy loam 3 N 5 pr+cent,lopes 35 X' 78 Weld loam.0 to I percent slopes Loup Bud loamy sands.0 to 3 percent slopes IF 19 Weld loam. I l0 1 per(ent slopes -• 36 Midway Shingle complex.5 to 20 percent slopes 80 1 Weld loam.3 to 5 pert emu slopeso 81 Wiley-Colby complex 0 to I yen ent slopes 37 Nelson tine sandy loam.0 to 3 percent slopes 82 Wiley Colby complex, l0 3 percent stapes 38 Nelson?Pile sandy loam.3 to 9 Wiley Colby complex,3 In 5 on,ens sours 39 Noon loan,0 to 1 percent slopes slopes •40 Nunn loam.1 to 3 percent slopes 41 Nunn clay loam.0 to I percent slopes 42 Nunn clay loam, I to 3_percent slopes 41 Nunn loamy sandy.0 to I percent slopes • 15—Colby loam, 1 to 3 percen. s. This is a deep, This soil has g ,..itential for urban and recreational well drained soil on uplands at elevations of 4,850 to 5,050 development. Road'design can be modified to compensate feet. It formed in calcareous eolian deposits. for the limited capacity of this soil to support a load. • Typically the surface layer is pale brown loam about 12 Capability subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; inches thick. The underlying material is very pale brown Loamy Plains range site. silt loam to a depth of 60 inches. 18—Colby-Adena loans, 3 to 9 Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is percent slopes. These p y gently sloping to moderately sloping soils are on plains, high. The effective rooting depth is GO inches or more. hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,750 to 4,900 feet. The Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is Colby soil, which makes up about 55 percent of the map moderate. unit, occupies the steeper, convex parts of the landscape. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- The Adena soil, about 30 percent of the unit, occupies the monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, less steep, slightly concave parts. About 15 percent is beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- Kim loam and Weld loam. ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa The Colby soil is deep and well drained. It formed in followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pale brown loam about 7 inches thick. The underlying pipelines may he needed for proper water application. material to a depth of 60 inches is very pale brown silt All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- loam. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. high. The effective rooting depth is GO inches or more. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is high. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to The Adena soil also is deep and well drained and winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels formed in calcareous eolian deposits. Typically the surface per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is brown and very pale brown slay loam about 3 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very pale too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- brown silt loam. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface Terracing may also be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass This unit is used for nonirrigated cropland and rang r•- and needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- land. It is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat and is tion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition summer fallowed in alternate years to allow moisture ac- deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease;-blue grama, buf- cumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for benefi- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase; cial use of fertilizer. and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- Stubble mulch fanning, striperopping, and minimum til- nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Management of vegetation on this soil should be based Terracing also may-be needed to-control water erosion. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produe- The potential native vegetation on this unit is tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition, dominated by blue grama. Sideoats grama, little bluestem, Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are Production ranges from 1,800 pounds per acre in favora- suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the ble years to 1,100 pounds in unfavorable years. As range seasonal-requirements of livestock. It-can be seeded into condition deteriorates, the sideoats grama and little a clean, finn sorghum stubble or it can be-drilled into a bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and blue firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has grama, buffalograss, and several perennial forbs and proven most-successful. shrubs increase. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and the site as range condition becomes poorer. shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Management should be based on taking half and leaving suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if vegetation should -be continued for as many years as the range is in poor condition. Sideoats grama, little possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and bluestem, western wheatgrass, bluegrama, pubescent have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- haekberry. The shrubs bestsuited are skunkbush sumac, ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, seedbed. Plowing and drilling should be on the contour to and cottontail, and rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, minimize runoff and soil losses. Seeding early in spring cottontail, and coyote, are best suited to this soil. Under has proven most successsful. Capability subclass I Ve irrigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, nonirrigated; Colby soil in Loamy Slopes range site, benefiting many kinds of openland wildlife. Forage Adena soil in Loamy Plains range site. production is typically low on rangeland, and grazing management is needed if livestockand wildlife share the range. Livestock watering facilities also -are utilized by various wildlife species. 47—Olney fine sandy loam, 1 , percent slopes. Wildlife is an ii,.pbrtant secondary use of this soil. The This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape dark surface layer. Some small leveled areas are also in- cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- cluded. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be is yellowish brown and very pale brown sandy clay loam attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 managing livestock grazing, inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. g 6 and reseeding where needed. Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area Permeability and available water capacity are has resulted in urbanization of much of the Olney soil. moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or This -soil has good potential for urban and recreational more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is development. The only limiting feature is the moderately low. rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- hazard of ground water contamination from sewage monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- subclass IIe irrigated, lVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa -range site. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar-beets, small grain, • . -. -,or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper water application. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow irrigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fer- tilizer are needed for top yields. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels per acre. The soil is summer (allowed in alternate years to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. The potential native vegetation on this range site is dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential production ranges from 2,200-pounds per acre in favora- ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem,-sand reedgrass, and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation on this soil-should be based on taking-half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, blue grama, and pubescent wheatgrass are suita- ble for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed at the time of planting and during dry periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, easternredcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac,and Siberi- an peashrub. 60—Shingle-Renohill complex, .3 to 9 percent slopes. stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. This gently sloping to moderately sloping map unit is on Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. plains, hills, and ridges at elevations of 4,600 to 4,750 feet. The potential native vegetation on the Renohill soil is The Shingle soil makes up about 65 percent of the unit, dominated by western wheatgrass and blue grana. Buf- and the Renohill soil about 25 percent. About 10 percent falograss is also presented. Potential production ranges is Tassel fine sandy loam. The Shingle soil occupies the from 1,000 pounds per acre in favorable years to GOO steeper, convex parts of the landscape, and the Renohill pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- soil occupies the less steep, slightly concave positions. orates, a blue grama-buffalograss sod forms. Undesirable The Shingle soil is shallow and well drained. It formed weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition in residuum from calcareous shale. Typically the surface becomes poorer. layer is grayish brown loam about 6 inches thick. The un- Management of vegetation on the Renohill soil should denying material is light yellowish brown clay loam. Cal- be based on taking half and leaving half of the total an- careous clayey shale is at a depth of about IS inches. nual production. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western low. The-effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Sur- wheatgrass, blue grama, sideoats grama, buffalograss, pu- face runoff is medium to rapid, and the erosion hazard is bescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable moderate. for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal The Renohill soil is moderately deep and well drained. requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, It formed in residuum from shale. Typically the surface firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm layer is grayish brown clay loam about 9 inches thick. The prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has proven subsoil is grayish brown and pale brown clay loam about most successful. 14 inches thic-k. The substratum is clay loam. Shale is at a Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and depth of about 32 inches. coyote, are best suited to this unit. Because forage Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is production is typically low, grazing management is needed moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. if livestock and wildlife share the range. Livestock water- Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is ing facilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. moderate. Capability subclass Vle irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Shin- This unit is used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. The • gle soil in Shaly Plains range site, Renohill soil in Clayey potential native vegetation on the Shingle soil is Plains-range site. dominated by alkali sacaton, western wheatgrass, and blue grama. Buffalograss, sideoats grama, needle- andthread, little bluestem, sedge, winterfat,and fourwing saltbrush are also present. Potential -production ranges from 800 pounds per acre in favorable years to 500 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition deteri- orates, the mid grasses decrease and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade the site as range condition becomes-poorer. Management of vegetation on the Shingle soil should be based on taking half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, blue grama, alkali sacaton, sideoats grama, little bluestem, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass -are suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum 78—Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent apes. This is a deep, All methods 0.--,Trig: Lion are suitable, but furrow ir- well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,850 to rigation is the most coin non. Barnyard manure and coin- 5,000 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in I mercial fertilizer :ore needed for Lop yields. mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of 'Phis soil is well suited to winter wheat, barley, and loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled I sorghum if it is sutnIner fallowed in alternate years. areas. Winter wheat is the principal crop. The predicted average Typically the surface layer of-this Weld soil is brown I yield is 33 bushels per acre. If the crop is winterkilled, loam about il) inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale spring wheat can lie seeded. Generally precipitation is ton brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 incites ' low for beneficial use of fertilizer. thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. 1 Stubble mulch ('arming, striperopping, and minimum tit- Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. t 'age are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It grama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass; is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area includ- and needleandthread, are also present. Potential proctor - ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, Lion ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf- sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Few conservation prac- falograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage incre:eo- tices are needed to maintain top yields. and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir_ meals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and core- Management of vegetation on this soil should be lamed l mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- tion. Seeding is desirable if the-range is in poor condition. Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are well suited to Ihis soil. Summer fallow a year before Sideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue planting anti continued cultivation for weed control are grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings, suitable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into Trees that are best suited and have good survival are a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian proven most successful. Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally peashnrb, and American plum. well suited to this soil. Summer fallow a year be fore Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat planting and continued cultivation for weed control are needed to insure establishment and survival of plantings development, including tree and shrub plantings and grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be suc_ Trees that an best suited and have good survival are cessful without irrigation in most years. Under irrigation, Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa good wildlife habitat can be established, benefiting many pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The kinds of openlnnd wildlife. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian This soil has good potential for urban and recreational peashrub, and American plum. development. The chief limiting soil features for urban Openland wildlife, such as pheasant, mourning dove, development :re the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil and cottontail, are best suited to this soil. Wildlife habitat. as it wets anti dries and the limited capacity of the soil to development, including tree and shrub plantings and support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Cana- grass plantings to serve as nesting areas, should be stilt- bility class I irrigated. cessful without irrigation during most years. Under ir- 79—Weld loam, I to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, . rigation, good wildlife habitat can be established, benefit well drained soil on smooth plains at elevations of 4,850 to ing many kinds of openland wildlife. 5,000 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in This-soil has good potential for urban and recreational mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of r development. The chief limiting soil features for urban loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled development are the shrink-swell potential of the subsoil areas' as it wets and dries and the limited capacity of the soil to Typically the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown support a load. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capa- loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale bility subclass Ile irrigated, Illc nonirrigated; Loamy brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches Plains range site. thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is silt loam. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is GO inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops corn- monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets (fig. 8), beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol- lowed by con), corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines are needed for proper water applications. MCRAE & SHORT, INC. CLIENT 4:14•1C4 COO):o€/yer PROJECT NO. 6400 Greeley, Colorado _PROJECT 44/OMSLy f/ E/'7NVC// /?/,/. D. Engineering, Surveying MADE BY DATES//$/CHECKED BY DATE._ SHEET / OF ,CC 000 lPLEI' / .Z'/r//c0. 'A1/ T,ll/1/1 4// /'// 'c c/0IL,_/�4a.r-c A 4c 'c-on,ru.�/r J c✓ieIs.de .air 7`/c. /49 !'sari f,%p i LPG r/ a-o -e'hctrtsr 4,n 771, ,E},>` 4(444(e/try z/ co7 //_r .-ice-o 74racA Ier+ "a /at 4,4 2' '3 % r terse r seo%.n diee ceS / ,[.� }b{�-J'itEoH.�7Z/UU/..f� �- �. !'!Y//7//ft ct s>.i � / a c it nic on [-OT z,__ ?' .C/n/slc.c/ 9/la _ /ceec�/c1 ac 49-63, ti off ,Lo/ 3 1%0, _ ;#t/s//rcJ y/.2I:10// 14.6;4 Al :. // 496x0 Tic lc /chat al(/a' S/f e O-I1- .. 1/�ad; , c4acaec4ce,/ . oi, 77c:. /�(G t/O cat-Jet I (( !4 c._lid :ed fGS/4,- C ,74 I I I I I Loan4 ,ai Qtt(I4� _ 1 i r iI goo ' ± I I C73a4)AmLq , P m '/4\/ -----T---1-r--tt-/-7-1--2, -" l/ 1 red t I,c9Qi 1„ 1 7-YP/C4Z- c/20SS-SeCT/ON , Fcoc GUTS Zit l iii ir Ii I i � 7*/ nao c1 /�s a tee if ra /e err/rr/ oh //� r ✓ flood 09 it `�{5 Q alt ! /lit I _ i4.e'' pct, do-.eo/ 77c '/acc f P /a L ti lG _z�GLou:< `�4�0 -f-f wag COL 7/�c .Coca7Ergs t '_e i 4c . . _.' /or. cu cheat l cccc�ev/,/ce a/ /S4e 0 _ __ '"ii I 000p0IBmnt% 35 ek#1-_ rt 4 , 1 I ° a I g � � 1 _ €*: Al661-6 T era7., , Hello