Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout881046.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE REQUEST FOR ZONING VARIANCE FOR CITY OF GREELEY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, as a surrounding property owner, the Board has been presented with a request from the City of Greeley for a variance from the Zoning Code of the City concerning the installation of a sign, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said request, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the request of the City of Greeley for a variance for the installation of a sign be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chairman be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said request for variance. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 2nd day of November, A.D. , 1988 . y 0 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ^ WEL OUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder in/t 4/ . and Clerk to the Board Gene �i R. Brant e r, airman i / l tl,, BY: ):77,_,1, , C.W. Kirby, P o-Tem Deputy County erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ja que ne .e�F son C---S>74-= Go County Attorney /4%://4'4- Frank Yamaguchi f 881046 CITY OF GREELEY LUNING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION THIS FORM MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED DATE: FEE: RECEIPT NO: ADDRESS FOR VARIANCE REQUEST: 1000 10th Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1-8 BLOCK 75 SUBDIVISION Union Colony APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY Owner APPLICANT'S NAME: City of Greeley APPLICANT' S ADDRESS : 1000 10th Street, Greeley CO PHONE OWNER'S NAME: City of Greeley OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1000 10th Street, Greeley CO PHONE APPLICANT REPRESENTED BY: Sam Sasaki, City Manager ADDRESS: 1000 10th Street, Greeley CO PHONE 350-9775 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - OFFICE USE ONLY HEARING SCHEDULED HEARING HELD NOTICE PUBLISHED NEWSPAPER NAME PROPERTY POSTED REVIEWED AT A.R.T. A.R.T. MINUTES INCLUDED ACTION BY BOARD OF APPEALS: ZONE: PRESENT USE OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION Page 1. 8S1A+46 Action By Applicant Regarding Property Building Permit applied for and denied Yes (yes or no Has appeal previously been made and denied (yes or no • ACTION REQUESTED Ruling on interpretation by Administrative Official Section in question if applicable. 'x Variance to code as it applies to requirements for: Minimum Front Yard Minimum Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard Minimum Lot Area x Limitation on Freestanding Signs x Limitation on Illuminated Signs x Minimum Sign Area Describe item checked giving dimensions where appropriate: See Attachment A State conditions substantiating request: (ATTACH SURVEYS, PLANS, AND OTHER DATA THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THE BOARD'S EVALUATION) . See Attachment Al PAGE 2 . 881046 SIGNATURE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS The undersigned have reviewed the attached request for a variance from the requirement of the Zoning Code. Those objecting to the granting of this variance have indicated so by placing a mark in the right hand column . NAME (PLEASE TYPE SIGNATURE ADRESS PLEASE CHECK OR PRINT) FOR AGAINST First United Methodist Church Weld County k1�0nn/ 9is /6 ST ✓.. U.S. West United Bank Johnson Building • Osco Drug 352-2536 1014 11th Ave. 352-4740 1015 11th Ave. United Bank Plaza Norman Dean U.S. Postal Service 930 11th Avenue I/We certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. :PPL:ANT' S SIGN TUBE DATE c c.c."/ / / O ER'S SI URE D TE Page 3 . 881046 Attachment A 1 . The Sign Code states that for the traffic zones within the Improvement District # 1 (Chapter 18 . 29 . 110) the maximum size of a sign should not exceed 20 square feet . Both signs on Attachment B are existing two-sided signs with each face covering 28 square feet , for a total of 56 square feet . 2. The City 's Sign Code also prohibits freestanding signs (Chapter 18. 29 . 080) . Both signs shown on Attachment B are freestanding pedestal signs. 3 . The Sign Code prohibits internally illuminated signs (Chapter 18. 29 . 070) . The existing signs in question are internally illuminated. 381046 Attachment Al The argument substantiating the request is the fact the signs were existing prior to the adoption of the Improvement District #1 Sign Code, adopted in 1984 . The requested variance would not adversely affect the surrounding area , the future development of the area, or the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the area. The need for this request is not self-imposed in that the sign was constructed legally . To remove the signs and install a new one would cost more than to use the existing signs . For these reasons the Zoning Board is requested to grant the three specific variances to the Greeley Municipal Code as outline above. 881046 9t0199 enuany y}L l 1 ( L 1 AI v O m ...I I y O o 0 I m co co c - u. o 47.; in v o o �' v cv C IE co to T 6 1 I ca N co I " C m " cio m a 0 d T 1 (n N r.. r co anuand 410 L c0 0 4.: IN CONSIDERING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: 1. shall consider the effect which the variance would have on the surrounding area, its effect on future development in the area, its conformity to the comprehensive plan, and in general the effect which the variance would have on the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area; 2. shall not grant the variance if the need for it is self-imposed in the sense that development or construction was begun without full compliance with all applicable la"+s, ordinances, rules and regulations; 3. shall grant a variance onl,, if the need for it arises from some exceptional condition of the lot or buildir.r involved, such as a unique lot shape; 4. shall not grant a variance unless to fail to do so would seriously and substantially impair the usability of the lot in question, to an extent not contemplated by this code. The Zoning Board of Appeals will consider the items below before granting a variance located in the General Improvement District #1: If the variance is located within Greeley General Improvement District #1, applicant must submit two (2) copies of the application, in order that a recommendation can be obtained from the Greeley Downtown Development Corporation. COMMENTS FROM THE GREELEY DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: 08-14-85 CA:ja 881046 Hello