Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout851215.tiff D t • Volume 9, No. 7 April 5, 1985 NATIONAL WATER LINE® National Water Resources Association 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North Bldg., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20024 (202)488-0610 ***It has been almost a year since Wm Gianelli submitted his resignation as Assistant Secretary of Army (Civil Works) to President Reagan. Since that time , his deputy, Robert K . Dawson has served as Acting Assistant Secretary. On April 2, the White 10 House finally named Dawson to fill the post and 00 sent his nomination to the Senate for confirmation. The nomination will be considered by the Committee on Armed Services . Letters supporting Dawson ' s appointment should be sent to Sen Barry Goldwater, Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, US Senate, Washington, DC 20510 . No date has been set for the confirmation hearing . A native of Alabama, Dawson received his Juris Doctorate in 1971 from the Cumberland School of Law, Samford University, Birmingham, AL. Beginning in 1972 , he served as Legislative Assistant to Rep. Jack Edwards . From 1974 to 1981 he served as Administrator of the House Committee on Public Works and Transportation . During part of that time Rep Harold T . "Bizz" Johnson was Chairman of the Committee . From May 1981 to May 1984 he served as Principal Deputy to Assistant Secretary Gianelli . During his tenure at the Pentagon, Dawson has worked diligently with Gianelli to successfully streamline the cumbersom permit system under Sec 404 of the Clean Water Act. Through these efforts, the average time to obtain a 404 permit has been reduced from an average of 127 days down to 74 days . ***Rep Morris (Mo) Udall (AZ ) plans to introduce later today, the bill to increase the authorization of the Reclamation Small Projects Act. A number of members have agreed to co-sponsor this important legislation . We say important , because loan applications now in the pipeline exceed the current authorization. Details on the bill in the next issue of NWL. ***Negotiations between the Department of the Interior and officials of the Westlands Water District in California have concluded with an agreement to close Kesterson Reservoir expeditiously, to continue the planned delivery of irrigation water on lands within Westlands, and to take important steps toward a long-term solution to the drainage problems within the San Joaquin Valley. In the Department announcement, Secretary Hodel said, "This agreement will assure the closure of Kesterson Reservoir in a much shorter period of time than if the Department had attempted to use its unilateral power and authority under the law to resolve the issue . I have no doubt that any attempt to act unilaterally would have resulted in protracted, divisive and counter-productive litigation. This consensus approach is the best way for the Department to fulfill its missions both to protect the environment and to provide irrigation water which is so essential to the agricultural community. " The Secretary continued by saying, "I would like to summarize briefly the essential points of this agreement . Westlands will be required to eliminate the flow of drain waters into the San Luis Drain and Kesterson Reservoir. The reduction of drain water will begin on or before September 30, 1985, and the reduction will be phased to allow for development of alternative facilities , and Westlands is required to complete preparation of its preliminary plan for alternative means of disposal by June 1 , 1985 . Most importantly, under the agreement there will be a complete ter- mination of drain water from Westlands into Kesterson after June 30, 1986 . " Jerry Butchert , manager of the Westlands Water District said that the closing of Kesterson Reservoir by the Department of the Interior was finally "bringing this mess to an end . " While Westlands now inherits the problem, Butchert said the District would be working over the next fifteen months on a series of possible solutions to the problem including bird free ponds, salt tolerant crops , recycling and, as a last resort stop gap measure, to block the drains . During that same time period the District would be working with the Bureau on long term solutions to meet future conditions . At the present time, irrigation return flows are about 7 ,000 AF/year. Over the next 30 years, the return flows will average nearly 80,000 AF annually as more and more irrigated lands in the area require drainage systems . Butchert expressed his deep 1985 CONVENTION, SHERATON WAIKIKI, NOVEMBER 3-8 851215 bd m Ty +- 22 8-5 - throughout this difficult period . He said he was particularly grateful for the time and effort devoted to the problem by Secretary Hodel and Solicitor Richardson. It was two weeks that seemed like an eternity to the farmers and financial institutions in the San Joaquin Valley. When Secretary Hodel announced the water cut-off on March 15, land value in the area fell to zero . Both equity and security disappeared, but under the agreement now in place, the financial catastrophe has been avoided and the situation generally has returned to normal . ***We want to flag your attention to H.R. 1650 , which is a reintroduction of last year ' s House-passed Safe Drinking Water Act legislation with the controversial groundwater protection provisions , Sections 203 and 204 included. These sections authorize Federal intrusion into the rights of the states to protect and manage their groundwaters. While hearings were conducted last year on the Safe Drinking Water Act legislation, Sections 203 and 204 were added to the bill after the hearings were completed. As a result the Committee did not provide the State water resource agencies , which are the most affected by these provisions , an opportunity to comment . Nonetheless , the House approved the bill by an overwhelming 366 to 27 . Fortunately, the bill did not clear the Senate before the 98th Congress adjourned. No one wants to vote against clean water, nor to favor dirty water , but Rep Howard Nielson (UT ) expressed the following concerns about the bill : Both section 203 and 204 create broad new admin- istrative authority over ground water. Section 203 would require the State to "guarantee or provide for an alternative drinking water supply when an underground source of drinking water is contaminated. " Such a guarantee would require not only new regulatory programs at the State level but would force the States to guarantee quantities of waters which in some States would be extremely difficult and in other States , such as Utah , impossible to guarantee . In addition, section 204 would enable the EPA to require any person who contributed to the contamination of the ground water to pay the entire cost of providing alternative water and might even be able to order them to build an entire new public water system. Another area of concern is that of costs . Although the Federal expenditures appear modest several things must be noted. First, the combined authorization expenditure for the two sections are $85 million a year for the next 4 years , a significant first step. Second , it is possible and likely that section 203 funding will be continued after the initial 4 years and that section 204 funding will require large funding levels in order to complete all the projects and plans that will need funding . Third, no one has estimated the cost to the States as a result of these provisions . It seems irre- sponsible to mandate a State program without asking for their input and estimating the potential costs . Hearings on H.R. 1650 will be set sometime after the Easter Recess . ***We had thought the Stockman proposal to merge the BuRec and COE had been laid to rest because of the objections of Secs Clark and Weinberger, but the issue is still simmering and further conversations between officials of the two organizations on this subject are being scheduled. We hope that Sec Hodel can find ample justification to support the position of his predecessor -- if it ain' t broke, don' t fix it ! ***It has been a busy two weeks as delegation after delegation visited Washington to appear before the appropriations committee in support of appropriations for their respective projects. We cannot list all those who testified, but we warmly commend them for their dedication, and for the time and effort they contribute to help assure the conservation, development and wise use of our water resources . ***This is a final reminder of the upcoming Federal Water Seminar to be held April 22-23 at the Capitol Holiday Inn in Washington, DC. Seating for the breakfasts is limited so if you haven' t sent in your registration form to our office , DO IT NOW! (We do have to give the hotel a guarantee. ) Don' t be left out in the hall while everyone else is enjoying a first rate breakfast and first class speakers . See you there ! ! NATIONAL WATER LINE BULK RATE National Water Resources Association U.S. POSTAGE 955 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W. PAID Washington, D.C. 20024 PERMIT NO. 2316 WASHINGTON, D.C. NATIONAL WATER LINE is intended as an information service to the N.W.R.A. members. Quote it you like, but please credit the NATIONAL WATER LINE. /cc,outwit, 1 lee "°"1`"` $100 SUBSCRIPTION FEE PER YEAR Return Postage Guar....,...... Hello