The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About890224.tiff RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD CONCERNING SHOW CAUSE HEARING - MANUEI: BALDERAS WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 1st day of March, 1989 , at the hour of 9 : 00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the revocation of Use by Special Review Permit #713 which was granted to Manuel Balderas for the following described parcel of land: Part of the SE$ of Section 22 , Township 2 North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said Hearing was continued from November 21 , 1988 , to allow Mr. Balderas to submit an application for an Amended Use by Special Review, and WHEREAS, the Board was informed by Keith Schuett, representing the Department of Planning Services , that on February 8 , 1989 , an Amended Use by Special Review Permit was approved for Mr. Balderas , and WHEREAS , the Board deemed it advisable to dismiss said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Show Cause Hearing to consider revocation of Use by Special Review Permit #713 , granted to Manuel Balderas , be , and hereby is , dismissed. 890224 /7, �7.i Rage 2 RE : DISMISS SHOW CAUSE HEARING - BALDERAS -The above and foregoing -Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of March, A.D. , 1989 . �///1i y f Lvn�P� � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County C erk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board C.W. Kir y, C airman $ n? hsonProTem ' J , eputy County lerk ilgraiStr APPR VED AS TO FORM: Brantner George ep edy / (County Attorney /d Goa 890224 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 88-70 RE: HEARING TO -SHOW CAUSE FOR -REVOCATION OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW #713 - MANUEL BALDERAS A public hearing was conducted on March 1, 1989, at 9:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro—Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon £. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Tommie -Antuna Assistant -County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison planning Department representative, Keith Schuett The following business -was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 19, 1988, and duly published November 2, 1988, in the Platteville Herald, a public hearing was conducted to consider the revocation of Use by Special Review #713, issued to Manuel Balderas. Keith Schuett, representing the Department of Planning Services, said that Mr. Balderas was granted approval of Amended Use ihy Special Review #713; therefore, the property is -now _in compliance. Mr. Schuett requested that the Board close this matter. Commissioner Lacy moved to dismiss this matter against Manuel Balderas. Seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, the motion carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 6th day of March, 1989. APPROVED: Lfih^'"��,'`(�/'�Yw:`I_& :r) BOARD _OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: U WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Mark and Recorder / 1/ and Clerk to the Boar \ C.W. Kirby, Chai an fly puty L-ounty C e Q. cq e Jo ns n, Pro-Tem �✓; Z 'Er Gene R. 13rantner -71 George ne y _ Go TAPE #89-8 DOCKET 1188-70 PL0006 (?t .f/. DATE: March 1, 1989 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 USR/SUP: USR-713 OPERATOR PROPERTY OWNER Manuel Balderas, Jr. Manuel & Anita Balderas 20767 Weld County Road 18 27867 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Keenesburg, CO 80643 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE$ of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately one mile north of the Town of Keensburg; north of Weld County Road 57. The Department of Planning Services' staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners close this zoning compliance hearing case. Mr. Bald-eras has brought his property into compliance with the approval of Amended USR-713 on February 8, 1'989. 890224 To Whom It May Concern: This is to conform that on September 20th, 1985, we sold Manuel M. Balderas, Jr and Anita M. Balderas, property located at 27867 WCR 18, Keenesburg, Colorado. On this property was located a mobile home and a box car that we used for storage . (11 CARLOS A. GRAY Gn,r3 1-17 DONNA M. GRAY SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS o2 7 DAY OF frpiu- , 1988. SEAL /�//L NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: d-7c- ya EXHIBIT 10/i9/a5- N 890224 • / • VL October 19, 1988 4~y CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 t ,y USR/SUP: USR-713 OPERATOR PROPERTY OWNER Manuel Balderas, Sr. Manuel & Anita Balderas 20767 Weld County Road 18 27867 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Keenesburg, CO 80643 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEk of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately one mile north of the Town of Keenesburg; of Weld County Road 57. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the following standards as approved for USR-713 are not in compliance: Development Standard #2 required a six foot high chain-link fence shall surround the use by special review area on the north and west sides. A six foot high privacy or solid type fence shall be located on the south and east property lines. Plans for the fence on the south and east property lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Engineering Department. Field inspection finds that the privacy or solid wood fence to be constructed on the eastern and southern property lines not erected. Based upon this information, the Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners schedule a Show Cause public hearing on November 7, 1988, to consider revocation of USR-713. 890224 88 I'C ti WARRANTS: Don Warden presented the following warrants for approval by the Board: General fund $358,357.66 Handwritten warr-ants: Payroll 6,208.22 Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion which carried unanimously. BIDS: PRESENT LIGHTING SUPPLIES - BUILDINGS & GROUNDS: Bette Rhoden, Director of Purchasing, made of record the names of the bidders and the amount bid by each, and said this is to be considered for approval on October 5. BUSINESS: NEW: CONSIDER REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AT INTERSECTION OF WCR 4 AND 47: Commissioner Lacy moved to refer this matter to the Engineering Department for its recommendation. Commissioner Kirby -seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF FRAN CHRISTENSEN TO WELD LIBRARY DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this Resolution concerning the ratification of the appointiment of Fran Christensen to the Weld Library District Board of Trustees, with her term to expire October 31 , 1993. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson, the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON WCR 4: Commissioner Lacy moved to refer this matter to the Engineering Department for recommendation. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Kirby, carried unanimously. CONSIDER JTPA DISLOCATED WORKER GRANT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN: Tedi Guerrero, representing the Department of Human Resources, said this Grant concerns classroom training, on-the-job training and job search activities of dislocated worker participants. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve said JTPA Grant and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Lacy seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. PLANNING: CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: ZONING VIOLATIONS - CLEVELAND & BRACKNEY; SIMS; MAY; AND HODGES & HOGARTH: Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Resolution authorizing the County Attorney to proceed with legal action against Gary and Karen Cleveland & Michael Brackney; Robert and Noreen Sims; Ralph and Barbara May; and Elmo and Hazel Hodges & John and Norma Hogarth for violations of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Lacy, carried unanimously. CONSIDER PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING - BALDERAS: Brian Bingle, representing the Department of Planning Services, said Manuel Balderas, Jr. , was granted a permit for Use by Special Review on February 5, 1986. Mr. Bingle said that in the opinion of the Planning staff, Mr. Balderas is not in compliance with Development Standards I/2, fence requirement; and #10, location of two additional mobile homes on the property. He said the staff recommends that the Board schedule a Show Cause hearing to consider revocation of the USR. Anita and Manuel Balderas came forward to answer questions of the Board. Ms. Balderas testified that there are not two mobile homes on the property. She said one of the vehicles is a recreational vehicle and the mobile home was there when they purchased the property and is Minutes — September 21, 1988 Page 2 890224 only used for storage. Commissioner Lacy requested that an affidavit be obtained from the previous owner stating that the trailer was on the property when sold to Mr. and Mrs. Balderas. Discussion followed concerning the fencing, and Mr. Bingle said the staff would not object if the Board waives Development Standard #2 if the neighbors are contacted and they agree in writing that the fence is not necessary. Commissioner Lacy moved to continue this matter to October 19 at 9:00 A.M. allowing time to contact the previous owner requesting an affidavit stating that the mobile home was on the property when purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Balderas; and also allowing the Planning staff time to contact the neighbors to obtain written opinions concerning the fence as required by Standard #2. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. CONSIDER PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING — TATUM: Mr. Bingle presented this matter, saying that Jack and Shirlene Tatum were granted a Use by Special Review _Permit on August 20, 1986. He said the staff feels that the Tatums are in violation of Development Standards #3, concerning implementation and maintenance of trees; #7, which concerns construction on the property; and #11, any material deviation requires prior approval by the Board. Mr. Bingle recommended that the Board schedule a Show Cause hearing on October 12. Neither Jack nor Shirlene Tatum was present or represented. Commissioner Lacy moved to schedule a Show Cause hearing concerning this matter for October 12, 1988, at 9:00 A.M. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson, the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The Resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent agenda. There were no Ordinances. Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by the Acting Clerk to the Board. There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:40 A.M. APPROVED: ATTEST: ‘71112 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD UNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder g 'v .a%_ .J and Clerk to By: �Deput�unty Cto the Bpar Gene R. Brantner, Chairman �/G G C.W. Kirby, Pro-TA Jac.ueli ,J.h, so . ✓ Gord '�//.�/t/ -. '�/aa t� ///) Frank Yamaguchi Minutes — September 21, 1988 Page 3 890224 PROBABLE CAUSE \A�1 DATE: September 21, 1988 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 (� USR/SUP: USR-713 OPERATOR PROPERTY OWNER Manuel Balderas, Jr. Manuel and Anita Balderas 20767 Weld County Road 18 27867 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Keenesbure, CO 80643 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SEA of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately one mile north of Keenesburg; north of Weld County Road 18 and west of Weld County Road 57. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff, that the following Standards as approved for USR-713 are not in compliance: Development Standard #2 requires a six foot high privacy fence or other solid type fence to be installed on the south and east property lines. Development Standard #10 stated that the area shall be limited to the plans shown herein. Any material deviations from the plans or standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant has located 2 additional mobile homes onto the property for the purpose of providing a residency and for storage. Based upon the information, the Department of Planning Services' staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners schedule a "Show Cause" public hearing on October 6, 1988, to consider revocation of USR-713. 890224 INSPECTOR'S REPORT NAME: Manual Balderas LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Part of the SE} of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. DATE: June 3, 1988 TIME: a.m. CASE NUMBER: USR-713 An on-site inspection was conducted to determine operational compliance with the approved conditions and Development Standards. The following items were found to be in violation: Development Standard #2 requires a six-foot high privacy or other solid type fence to be installed on the south and east property lines. This standard has not been satisfied. There are two mobile homes located on the property without the proper zoning permits which is in direct violation of Development Standard #10 r t nner 890224 ap .�" . '.F tiJ '�fi° . 'f $ t SC-ni tAt .1� ir iiii . }fit :- 3� , - C�/. i �� w! YA y■ �'51,• � la � i yr . < r--- . I z. � ;r ..,4,7,-14 1 w + rase a f Pil I I Aril.. .. a' ry,^e4�wt, 'a + i.. �E p- iT T M ; :, 890224 • DEPARTN( 1T OF PLANNING SERVICES cl(r:ii 0; PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 i IID e. s COLORADO June 7, 1988 Mr. Manuel Balderas, Jr. 27867 Weld County Road 18 Reenesburg, CO 80643 Re: USR-713 located in part of the SE} of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Balderas: Personnel from the Department of Planning Services conducted an on-site inspection of your property on June 3, 1988, to determine whether you were in compliance with the Development Standards placed on your property at the time USR-713 was approved. The inspection revealed violations of Development Standards 2 and 10. I have enclosed a summary of the items that appear to be in violation of the foregoing Development Standards. You are hereby requested to comply with the requirements of the Development Standards within thirty (30) days from the date of this letter. Failure to comply will result in our office scheduling a Probable Cause Hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. If the Board determines that there is sufficient probable cause to warrant further action, a Show Cause Hearing will be scheduled to consider revocation of the Use by Special Review Permit. If you have information that may clear up this matter, please telephone or write. If you have no additional information, please let me know and I will schedule an appointment with you to discuss the procedures and requirements necessary to resolve this matter. I would recommend you call and schedule an appointment so that I may reserve a sufficient amount to time to discuss this matter with you. Respectfully, $Y e ent Panner L. BiB:rjg 24 Enclosures I C., 1 Manual Balderas, Jr. 28767 W. C. R. #18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 June 21 , 1988 1-732-4451 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 RE: USR-713 located in Part of the SE1/4 of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M, Weld County , Colorado - M.B. AUTO SALVAGE Dear Sirs: This is in compliance with your letter dated June 7, 1988. Development Standard #2 (Six-foot high privacy fence> :: Due to the economic conditions, we have not been able to accomplish this requirement. We agreed to this condition to satisfy the neighbors. Maybe a new survey could be under taken to see if the neighbors still think a privacy fence is needed, or have the Lime extended. Some of our customers have indicated that we keep our place very neat and that a privacy fence is a barrier and would not be a ,justification to our business. We may be able to conduct our own survey if you permit it. Development Standard #10 (Mobile homes> : When we purchased the property there was a mobile home on the property that was used as storage. That same mobile home was re—located for better use . The second mobile home is a small 4 person recreational mobile home that we have for personal use. If this home is not allowed to be stored on our property , we were not aware of the requirement, and did not mean to violate any ordinances. If this does not meet with the requirements of your letter, please set up an appointment for a personal interview l:o resolve this matter . ee-t-e-/-4-4,17:2-0---z---1(6 A UEL BALDERAS, J R. Owner a 1117 JUN 2 7 1988 890224 W i Cu. Planning a;U@talSsia INSPECTIONS REPORT NAME: Manual Balderas LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Part of the SE' of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado DATE: September 9, 1988 TIME: a.m. CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 Field check showed that the property has not been brought into compliance with Development Standards #2 and 10 as approved with USR-713. The applicant was required to construct a solid wood fence on the south and east property lines. This fence has yet to be constructed. The mobile homes still located on the property have not yet been properly zoned. _-� , 7 Cuter Planner 890224 �l DEPARTME i OF PLANNING SERVICES ririt \ PHONE(303)35640 10 T. 4400 5 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 1 -, e• COLORADO September 13, 1988 Mr. Manual Balderas, Jr. 20767 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Re: ZCH-38 Dear Mr. Balderas: Notice is hereby given that on September 21, 1988, at 9:00, or as soon thereafter as the agenda of the Board of County Commissioners permits, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County will hold a Probable Cause public hearing pursuant to Section 81 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. This meeting will take place in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of this public hearing will be to review case number USR-713 for compliance with the Development Standards as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 5, 1986, to determine if probable cause exists to hold a hearing on revocation of USR-713 . Inspection by representatives of this office have identified that you are not in compliance with Development Standards #2 and 10 of USR-713. If it is determined at the public hearing that there is probable cause that you are not in compliance with Development Standards, the Board of County Commissioners will schedule a Show Cause public hearing to consider revocation of the Special Review permit. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please telephone. Respectfully, B 1/ n / ent Penner BJB:rjg 890224 ham' ,./(4,-/ "/-`'�--�` DATE: November 7, 1988 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 USR/SUP: USR-713 OPERATOR PROPERTY OWNER Manuel Balderas, Jr. Manuel & Anita Balderas 20767 Weld County Road 18 27867 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Keenesburg, CO 80643 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately one mile north of the Town of Keenesburg; north of Weld County Road 57. se z, The Department of Planning Services' staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners continue this Show Cause public hearing to November 2X, 1988, to consider revocation of USR-713. Mr. Balderas has requested this extension to allow him time to meet with the Keenesburg Town Council. 890224 CASE SUMMARY ZCH-38 Mr. Manuel Balderas 6-3-88 The property was inspected. It was determined that the property was not in compliance with approved Development Standards # 2 and 10. 6-7-88 Letter mailed to Mr. Balderas identifying the Development Standards in error. 6-22-88 Letter received from Mr. Balderas. 9-9-88 Inspection identifying property not in compliance with Development Standards. 9-13-88 Letter notifying Mr. Balderas of Probable Cause Hearing. 390224 INSPECTIONS REPORT NAME: Manuel Balderas, Jr. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Part of the SE3 of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado DATE: October 17, 1988 TIME: a.m. CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 A field inspection conducted with Mr. Balderas showed that the mobile home and travel trailer are in compliance with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the development standards. A review by staff of the County Commissioners file on this case shows what appears to be a mobile home located on the property. The applicant has gone on to state that a certified letter will be made available at the hearing. This letter will verify that the mobile home and box car were on the property at the time of purchase. The special review site is not in compliance with Development Standard #2. A six foot high privacy or solid type fence shall be located on the southern and eastern property lines. this fence has not been constructed. ,lBr a u e t Pla nor 890224 Town of Keenesburg INCORPORATED JULY, 1919 ZIP CODE 80649 WELD COUNTY. COLORADO October 3, 1988 Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO. 80632 RE: Balderas probable cause hearing concerning USR permit waiving the development standard #2 fence requirement. Dear Mr. Bingle, We have noted in the minutes of the County Commissioners meeting held September 21, 1988 there was consideration to waive development standard #2, fence requirement. Mr. Balderas assured the Town of Keenesburg he would put'up a privacy fence on the east and south side of his property. (see attachment) . The reason this request was made by the Town of Keenesburg is the residential zoning to the south and east of the Balderas property. We feel to waive this requirement would be detrimental to the future development of the adjoining property and therefore request this fence requirement not be waived. Sincerely, Ron Linnebur, Mayor Enc1: (1) cc: Weld County Commissioners GUI 5 1988 ItoCn. VIj I'[t ;,Ilmnu "w 890224 MB Auto Salvage 27867 Weld Co . Rd . 18 Keenesburg , CO 80643 Mayor of Keenesburg July 2, 1987 City Hall Keenesburg , CO 80643 Dear Mayor: We are writing regarding your request and city requirements to build a solid fence on the south and east sides of our salvage yard . Although we are willing to comply with the regulations , we are not able to do so at this time due to the large expense such a fence would cost and our current financial situation . We ask for your patience regarding this matter . Hopefully we will accomplish this requirement within a reasonable time frame . Sincerely , tee n3' ue I Ba I d eras Owner, MB Auto Salvage 0CT 5 1988 _ 890224Weld Co. 71rou;ur�Y Lnmous'un Town of Keenesbw'g INCORPORATED JULY.' 1919 Zip CODE 80843 WELD COUNTY. COLORADO October 3, 1988 0CT 6 1988 GREELfl. COLO. Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley; CO. 80632 RE: Balderas probable cause hearing concerning USR permit waiving the development standard #2 fence requirement. • Dear Mr. Bingle, We have noted in the minutes of the County Commissioners meeting held September 21, 1988 there was consideration to waive development standard #2, fence requirement. Mr. Balderas assured the Town of Keenesburg he would putup a privacy fence on the east and south side of his property. (see attachment). The reason this request was made by the Town of Keenesburg is the residential zoning to the south and east of the Balderas property. We feel to waive this requirement would be detrimental to the future development of the adjoining property and therefore request this fence requirement not be waived. Sincerely, / /inn- Y�. Ron Linn Mayor Encl: (1) cc: Weld County Commissioners • 890224 DATE: November 21, 1988 CASE NUMBER: ZCH-38 USR/SUP: USR-713 OPERATOR PROPERTY OWNER Manuel Balderas, Jr. Manuel & Anita Balderas 20767 Weld County Road 18 27867 Weld County Road 18 Keenesburg, CO 80643 Keenesburg, CO 80643 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE4} of Section 22, T2N, R64W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately one mile north of the Town of Keenesburg; north of Weld County Road 18. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the following standard as approved for USR-713 is not in compliance: Development Standard G`2 required a six foot high chain-link fence shall surround the use by special review area on the north and west sides. A six foot high privacy or solid type fence shall be located on the south and east property lines. Plans for the fence on the south and east property lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Engineering Department. Attached is a copy of the Town of Keenesburg's response following a regular Board meeting held November 14th 1988. Based upon all information gathered, the Department of Planning Services' staff recommends the following options to the Board of County Commissioners: 1 . Require the applicant to construct the six foot high privacy or solid type fence to be located on the east and south property lines. This plan for the fence on the south and east property lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Weld County Engineering Department; 2. If the applicant wishes to amend development standard #2, an amended use by special review permit shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services and obtain approval by the Board of County Commissioners no latter than June of 1989; or 3. The revocation of use by special review permit number USR-713. 890224 Town of Keenesburg INCORPORATED JULY, 1919 ZIP CODE Bone WELD COUNTY, COLORADO November 15, 1988 Department of Planning Brian Bingel , Planner 915 10th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 RE: Privacy fence on Manuel Balderas property located North West of Keenesburg. Dear Mr. Bingel : The Town Board of Keenesburg at their regular Board meeting November 14th 1988 offered and passed the following motion: Marc Sirios made a motion to rescind the privacy fence requirement that had been agreed on earlier by Balderas and the Town of Keenesburg, with the stipulation if this adjacent property is ever developed into residential hous- ing it would not prevent future Boards or developers from requesting this privacy fence requirement. Stan Gingerich seconded the motion. All voted aye. If there are any questions please feel free to call me. Town of Keenesburg Virginia Gray, Town Clerk CC: Manuel Balderas D E pnr-'7,1 p N0V 1 7 '?98 Halo co Pitolit ,t uNIYI,V::�IIN 890224 J co S O o C M 0 fU W ¢E O d ILo 1XO E m r9 O 0 rn it 6 H a 3d ¢ s� a fU cc 355 R PK En 0 O m o.≥ ©O a a- ¢ ¢ a W OU O v 3 3 0 0 S O ?ov Ll a .. N_ °u, % a `°\ LL , 4-4 C1 0 > i° ": m m an C. Tv O - a 0� {q W PO N C a"O NQ co 0 [l W 3N LL a w1' a° ° O i-7 m n o m ¢ E a IL WOW v m _ _ E2 E 't a E ¢ •� `O Z ii a a. an' 230 2 d CO W D a a cr Q.- 2n O a N Y — S861 auni"008c wiod Sd q SENDER:. Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services ere desired, and complete Items 3 and 41 °,Wit+Youlagdress in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this •catd.47oQa•being returned to you. The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the oersolt dgllvePodRo-and•ihe date of deliv♦erv. For additional fees the following services are available.Consult ',postmaster for fees and check box for additional service(s) requested. 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Re Restricted tra charge)1 -' t(Extra charge)? " - 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number MANUEL BALDERAS Type of Service: 27867 WELD COUNTY ROAD 18 0 Registered 0 Insured KEENESBURG, CO 80643 g Certified 0 COD 0 Express Mail Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Si n lure—Addr q� , ./ B. rAddressee's equested a Address(Oi ) If X //L,dLrYGJ�,o�t requested and fee paid) 6. ig 'lure—A ( —' x 7. Date of Delivery /© af- Y1 ke3 PS Form 3811, Mat.1987 * U.S.G.P.O.1887.178.288 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT 830224 Hello