The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About850778.tiff r,♦ 'qate• To Planning Commission D tQJune 4, 1985 CLOFADO From Department of Planning Services Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Subject The Following summarizes the proposed amendments to the Weld County Zoning Ordinance: SECTION 10 Amends Animal Unit definition by changing the maximum number of animals per lot to per acre in the agricultural zoned subdivisions and unincorporated communities. Amends Commercial Mineral Deposit definition to be consistent with Colorado Revised Statutes. Adds a new definition for extractor. This definition is consistent with Colorado Revised Statutes. Corrects a typographical error in the Livestock Confinement Operation definition. Amends the Mobile Home definition by rearranging the existing wording to clarify the definition. SECTION 29.4 Adds a new section to establish an investigation fee for land-use permits when an application is submitted to remedy an existing zoning violation. SECTION 31.2. 19 Identifies manufactured homes as a use by right in the agricultural zone district subject to additional requirements. SECTION 31.4.9 Amends the text to be consistent with Colorado Revised Statutes. SECTION 31.4. 15 Deletes the ten acre lot requirement for a home business. 850778 Page 2 SECTION 31.5.5 Adds a new section to clarify the animal unit bulk requirements in the agricultural zoned subdivisions and unincorporated communities. SECTION 32.6.2. 1 Amends the existing text to add manufactured homes and single family dwellings as a use by right in the R-5 (Mobile Home Residential) Zone Pistrict. SECTION 43.2.7 Amends the Accessory Structure Mobile Home text to allow mobile homes used as accessory structures to be reviewed by the Department of Planning Services and to issue zoning permits for them. SECTION 43.4 Adds a new section which delegates the authority to approve zoning permits for mobile homes without a public hearing to the Department of Planning Services if certain requirements are met. SECTION 45.4 Amends the text to be consistent with Colorado Revised Statutes. SECTION 46.4 Adds a new section which delegates the authority to approve zoning permits for manufactured homes without a public hearing to the Department of Planning Services if certain requirements are met. Amend the ANIMAL UNIT definition to read: ANIMAL UNIT: A term and number used to establish an equivalency for various species of LIVESTOCK (e.g. , one (1) cow is equivalent to two hundred (200) rabbits) . The number of LIVESTOCK allowed by right is dependent upon bulk requirements of the Agricultural or Residential Zone Districts. LIVESTOCK in excess of the bulk requirements for the Agricultural Zone District shall require a Use by Special Review Permit for a LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION. All LIVESTOCK shall have the following ANIMAL UNIT equivalents and bulk requirements: IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT Maximum Animal Unit Number of Number Equivalents Animals Per Acre Cow 1 1 4 Horse 1 1 4 Swine .2 5 20 Sheep . 1 10 40 Goat . 1 10 40 Poultry .02 50 200 Rabbit .02 50 200 IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONED SUBDIVISIONS, RESIDENTIAL ZONED DISTRICTS, AND UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES. Maximum Animal Unit Number of Number Equivalents Animals Per Acre Cow 1 1 2 Horse 1 1 2 Swine .5 2 4 Sheep .2 5 10 Goat .2 5 10 Poultry .02 50 100 Rabbit .02 50 100 PLATTED SUBDIVISIONS ZONED RESIDENTIAL Maximum Animal Unit Number of Number Equivalents Animals Per Lot Cow 1 1 2 Horse 1 1 2 Swine .5 2 4 Sheep .2 5 10 Goat .2 5 10 Poultry .02 50 100 Rabbit .02 50 100 Any combination of the above LIVESTOCK and their equivalents as a use by right shall not exceed the maximum of four (4) ANIMAL UNITS per acre in the Agricultural Zone District, two (2) ANIMAL UNITS per acre in an approved or recorded subdivision plat or on a LOT which is part of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions in the A District, Residential Zone Districts, or in an unincorporated community in the A District, or two (2) ANIMAL UNITS per LOT in Platted Subdivisions in Residential Zone Districts. Amend the COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT definition to read: COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT: A natural mineral deposit of limestone used for construction purposes, coal, sand, gravel, and quarry aggregate, for which extraction by an EXTRACTOR is or will be commercially feasible and regarding which it can he demonstrated by geologic, mineralogic, or other scientific data that such deposit has significant economic or strategic value to the area, state, or nation. Add new definition for EXTRACTOR to read: EXTRACTOR: Any individual, partnership, association, or corporation which extracts COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS for use in the business of selling such deposits or for use in another business owned by the extractor or any department or division of federal, state, county, or municipal government which extracts such deposits. Amend the LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION (L.C.O.) definition to read: LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION (L.C.O.) : A place of confinement for LIVESTOCK, corralled, penned or otherwise caused to remain in pens or corrals where feeding is other than grazing, or where the capacity at any one time is greater than permitted in the Bulk Requirements for the zoning district in which it is located. For example, an L.C.O. may include DAIRIES, feedlots, poultry and swine production facilities. Amend the MOBILE HOME definition to read: MOBILE HOME: A transportable STRUCTURE which exceeds either 8 feet in width or 32 feet in length, is built on a chassis and is designed, when connected to the required utilities, to be used as a year round DWELLING UNIT with or without a permanent foundation. Add new Section 29.4 to read: 29.4 Investigation Fee. An additional investigation fee shall be added to the cost of the permit application when specific land, USES, BUILDINGS, MOBILE HOMES, MANUFACTURED HOMES, and STRUCTURES that require a permit by this Ordinance are located, moved, operated, or constructed prior to obtaining a permit, The investigation fee shall be 50% of the fee established by separate action by the Board of County Commissioners for land-use applications. In no event shall the investigation fee exceed an amount set by separate action by the Board of County Commissioners. The payment of such investigation fee shall not relieve any persons from fully complying with the requirements of this Ordinance, nor from any other penalties prescribed herein. Amend Section 31.4. 15 to read: 31.4.15 HOME BUSINESS; Add new Section 31.2. 19 to read: 31.2. 19 MANUFACTURED HOME subject to the additional requirements of Section 46. Add new Section 31.5.5 to read: 31.5.5 Maximum number of ANIMAL UNITS permitted in the agricultural zoned subdivisions, residential zone districts, and incorporated communities. Two per acre. Amend Section 31.4.9 to read: 31.4.9 Solid Waste Disposal sites and facilities, subject to the additional requirements of Section 45.4; Amend Section 32.6.2. 1 to read: 32.6.2.1 One (1) MOBILE HOME, MANUFACTURED HOME, or SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING per LEGAL LOT. The MOBILE HOME, MANUFACTURED HOME, or SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING shall be connected to an served by a PUBLIC WATER system and a PUBLIC SEWER system. Evidence that PUBLIC WATER and PUBLIC SEWER are available to the LEGAL LOT shall be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. This requirement does not apply to any LEGAL LOT created prior to the enactment date of this Ordinance. This requirement also does not apply to any LOT included in a proposed subdivision which has preliminary subdivision plat or final subdivision plat approval by the Planning Commission or the Board of County Commissioners prior to the enactment date of this Ordinance. Amend Section 43.2.7 to read: 43.2.7 Accessory STRUCTURE. A zoning permit for a MOBILE HOME used as an accessory STRUCTURE on a lot in the A District may be issued by the Department of Planning Services subject to the following provisions: 43.2.7. 1 The applicant must obtain a building permit for a MOBILE HOME and must comply with all installation standards of the Weld County Building Code applicable to MOBILE HOMES. Electricity is the only utility which is permitted to be connected to the MOBILE HOME. 43.2.7.2 The MOBILE HOME may not be used on any basis as a DWELLING or as overnight or TEMPORARY housing for any person. 43.2.7.3 The applicant must demonstrate that no reasonable alternative exists to using the MOBILE HOME as an accessory STRUCTURE. 43.2.7.4 Only one zoning permit for a MOBILE HOME used as an accessory STRUCTURE may be issued per LEGAL LOT at any one time by the Department of Planning Services. 43.2.7.5 The Department of Planning Services shall make its determination on the issuance of a zoning permit for a MOBILE HOME used as an accessory STRUCTURE on the basis of a signed statement by the applicant that the conditions of Sections 43.2.7. 1 through 43.2.7.4 are met, upon information contained in the permit application, and upon such independent evidence as may be available or which the staff may reasonable require. 43.2.7.6 A zoning permit for more than one MOBILE HOME in the A District used as an Accessory STRUCTURE may be issued only upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners shall review the application for compliance with the criteria set out in Section 43.2.7. 1 through 43.2.7.4 at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The Board of County Commissioners shall give notice of the application for a zoning permit and the meeting date to those persons listed in the application as owners of property located within five hundred (500) feet of the parcel under consideration. Such notification shall be mailed, first class, not less than ten (10) days before the scheduled meeting. Such notice is not required by Colorado State Statute and is provided as a courtesy to surrounding property owners (the surface estate) . Inadvertent errors by the applicant in supplying such list or the Department of Planning Services in sending such notice shall not create a jurisdictional defect in the permit process even if such error results in the failure of a surrounding property owner to receive such notification. The Department of Planning Services shall provide a sign for the applicant to post on the property in question indicating that more than one MOBILE HOME to be used as an accessory STRUCTURE has been requested for the property, the meeting date and the Department of Planning Services telephone number at which further information may be obtained. The sign shall be posted by the applicant, who shall certify that it has been posted at least ten (10) days before the meeting date. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider any testimony of surrounding property owners concerning the effects of the accessory STRUCTURE MOBILE HOME on the surrounding properties. In addition, the Board shall consider compatibility of the accessory STRUCTURE MOBILE HOME with the surrounding area, harmony with the character of the NEIGHBORHOOD, its effects upon the immediate area, and the general health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the COUNTY. 43.2.7.7 All zoning permits for MOBILE HOMES used as accessory STRUCTURES are temporary. The permit shall automatically expire upon the cessation of the USE of the MOBILE HOME as an accessory STRUCTURE. The MOBILE HOME shall be removed from the property. Add New Section 43.4 to read: 43.4. The Board of County Commissioners delegates the authority to issue a zoning permit for a MOBILE HOME which otherwise requires the approval of the Board of County Commissioners through a public hearing process to the Department of Planning Services upon the determination by the Department that: 43.4.1 The applicant is in compliance with the criteria identified in the Ordinance for the specific category of zoning permit that is being applied for. 43.4.2 The applicant has submitted a petition containing the signatures of at least 707 of the people owning property within 500 feet of the property that the MOBILE HOME is proposed to be located on. The petition shall. indicate that the surrounding property owners who have signed the petition have no objections to the issuance of the zoning permit for the MOBILE HOME. 43.4.3 If the applicant is unable to obtain a petition in favor of the issuance of a zoning permit for a MOBILE HOME with at least 70% of the people's signatures owning property within 500 feet of the property that the MOBILE HOME is proposed to be located on, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider the zoning permit for the MOBILE HOME in a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Ordinance. Amend Section 45.4 to read: 45.4 Solid Waste Sites and Facilities or Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites 45.4.1 Certificates of Designation for solid or hazardous waste disposal sites and facilities as required by Colorado Revised Statutes and Code of Colorado Regulations shall not be deemed approved until or unless a Use by Special Review Permit has been approved by the Planning Commission or the Board of County Commissioners where required by this Ordinance. The Board shall be guided in its review of a Certificate of Designation by state statute and regulations contained in Colorado Revised Statutes and Code of Colorado Regulations. 45.4.2 Applicants for activities reviewed pursuant to Section 24 for any Solid Waste sites and facilities or Hazardous Waste disposal sites shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that there is a need for the facility within the proposed area of service, and the Planning Commission and Board shall be satisfied that a need exists as part of the determinations for any such permit. Add New Section 46.4 to read: 46.4. The Board of County Commissioners delegates the authority to issue a zoning permit for a MANUFACTURED HOME, which otherwise requires the approval of the Board of County Commissioners through a public hearing process, to the Department of Planning Services upon the determination by the Department that: 46.4.1 The applicant is in compliance with the criteria identified in the Ordinance for the specific category of zoning permit that is being applied for. 46.4.2 The applicant has submitted a petition containing the signatures of at least 707 of the people owning property within 500 feet of the property that the MANUFACTURED HOME is proposed to be located on. The petition shall indicate that the surrounding property owners who have signed the petition have no objections to the issuance of the zoning permit for the MANUFACTURED HOME. 46.4.3 If the applicant is unable to obtain a petition in favor of the issuance of a zoning permit for a MANUFACTURED HOME with at least 70% of the people's signatures owning property within 500 feet of the property that the MANUFACTURED HOME is proposed to be located on, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider the zoning permit for the MANUFACTURED HOME in a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Ordinance. V niux , 1! I n , , r PLATTE VALLEY REALTY. INC. 677 Bridge Street (P.O. Box 808) Brighton, Colorado 80601 (303) 659-4922 if // j / _ Vj�L -77- h �.�;.0 /J /J �Ld'L✓/ L-<- A / /Lc .<L GII,L-7-cr-L - i 7�2e� Y,�� ,� �e+�� +� - ''-`LLB° W:--#-It tedL-C,-rergtb L, ,-ZJ i . ---i-12-eft--; . l i- 7 ', . 0 . :t".7r #/ / te-LAC.--, " _--'n /12-1---frn_12---)"-PZ----)---Z476-' / , 17 1 ° a1,0i,icWr I I,',?( 17 1985 `iy L, C' Weld Co. Planning Commission Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated On PLATTE VALLEY REALTY, INC. 677 Bridge Street (P.O. Box 808) Brighton, Colorado 80601 (303) 659-4922 May 15, 1985 Mr . Chuck Cunliffe Yield County Planning and Zoning 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe : I am a realtor and a horse owner so I have twice the reason for writing this letter . Ordinance 89-H is having a terrible effect on property value . I understand the purpose behind the law but there must be a better way to deal with this. Two animal units per acre would be a great improvement . In the meantime, we have properties listed that people just won't even look at because of this law. Hopefully we can change this soon. Sincerely, Sandy D. Fitzgerar Sales Associate L 17 1986 Weld Co. Planning Commission Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated Qn1111 1s PLATTE VALLEY REALTY, INC. 677 Bridge Street May 15, 1985 (P.O. Box 808) Brighton, Colorado 80601 (303) 659-4922 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Planning and Zoning 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re : Ordinance 89-H Dear Mr. Cunliffe : The above referenced ordinance has had an adverse effect on the sale of properties that we currently have listed for sale and also on the properties that we have sold and closed. The two animals per lot would decrease these properties to a lesser value than what people paid for them. We have already lost three sales in the last two months because of this ordinance. I think this should be changed to at least two animals per acre. I am requesting notification of the date and time of hearing for review of changing this ordinance. Thank you. Sincerely ? Norma r- Tanning/ /n o �1� ��YE tat 17 1985 Weld Co. Planning Commission Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated ieMEMORAnDUM� hiDeTo Chuck Cunliffe Dale February 11 , 1985 COLORADO From Lee D. Morrison, Assistant County Attorney Subject: Oil and Gas Regulations Current state law, with respect to oil and gas, does not require that they be considered in the same context as coal, sand and gravel or limestone under CRS e34-1-305 . This is the provision which prohibits the Commissioners from taking zoning actions which would interfere with the present or future extraction of deposits by an extractor. However, the current Zoning Ordinance contains a definition of commercial mineral deposit which is broader than that included in the statute at 34-1-302 , and would appear, by use of the term "pool or fields, " to include oil and gas development. Further, the restriction imposed in the rezoning (but not the P.U.D. ) process prohibit a zoning if there are any greater restrictions placed on the extraction of mineral deposits under the proposed zoning than under the current zoning. State law only prohibits zoning actions in a manner which would interfere with the present or future extraction of the deposit by the extractor. It further provides that if there are no permanent structures that would interfere with the extraction, the zoning is not prohibited. Based on these considerations, I suggest that any amendments to the Zoning Ordinance or Building Code include a consideration of changes in the commercial mineral deposit protections now included in the Zoning Ordinance. I do recognize that some of these policies may go back to the Mineral Extraction Plan, which I have not recently reviewed and may need to be further considered in light of revisions to the Comprehensive Plan.-- Lee D. for ' n Assistant County Attorney u 121985 Weld Co. Planning Commission Alternatives for Animal Units for platted subdivisions zoned agricultural, unincorporated communities, and unplatted property zoned residential. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres i �ti ( To__ Planning Commission DateJune 4, 1985 COLORADO From _ Department of Planning Services Subject: Proposed Amendments to Sections 10, 29, 31, 32, 43, 45, and-46-Of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services recommends that the proposed amendments be approved for the following reasons: 1. The existing Zoning Ordinance is in need of revision and clarification with regard to procedures, terms, and requirements. The proposed amendments will better facilitate the administration of the ordinance. 2. The proposed amendments will be consistent with the future goals and needs of the County as set out in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendments will be consistent with the overall intent of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. June 15, 1985 Commissioners of Weld County To Whom It May Concern: We as Property Owners object to such changes, 1. First it reduces the value of these parcels of land for sale to people who want to live out and have animals such as horses and a calf or two . Most parcels have enough graze for more than two animals . 2 . Secondly this change of Rule is being approached with out notice being given to all land owners who are concerned. We found out about the change of 'Rule quite by accident. We hope our words of concern will be heard and consider- ation will be given . Robert N. Eaton, owner 2825 Arabian Brighton, Colorado JUN 1.2 1985 \\ Weld to.?wont taia�issioa • ✓✓✓ ca Y 5 a',icci-t'azc (-2 z�� ,_r •CL • 1--- , ( 0) L D EW- J yy TN�� alig{/ 6tte /ee JUN 131985 Weld Co. Planning Commission � /✓h�' J O /0 t",a -c/ /, � /lit JL f�!Z � th(4 C —€-;)? f" 7(,4 L git)72t Cp ((t t 11 %tom (/g,y /Acrd? gt) ��f /t,(' tt' tt t, t� �[��( < < ("et �Lc- GC12LY':-21 2/1-C- C7r^ et/t�yf L ' /Z i.ze�ltJ �L!'�IL/�`�L�iL to 1911 11/51 r� ��t c � LT' ��ZCJt!' �/ ^i l 4 eet Ai'i ) (l 1 tr, • ;'iLC.L,� ---1 1 c, IL CC le/ CZ'f�6 /19 V� 1 3 '� 1.(fr - (eZ ccl" �l�>t�f71 e /cam 0 IcE��ZC`e� 7�q CIc��e�c z<�j1�� ' ir, /� Lt/�/ l JU /�C u'� ��e CC's ' �l I' � genL�eaJL«� CJaAge �c. tc J7u �LLLr ll �('ne Z er7/.L'�it'z'7 " LC (1 net ll1[ . 1t' CL G��3e> JZ CoeCz / J l aee�rZlc /7v . .Q/ &llit[f aE'C1JVL � t� ZfZc, a.(. L&t i /tcieKlc,r] (17cc� lttr�7u4 .�CGIr.""�.� l �� L`�Ll�� p,i�,IlL� ��1t1 iclf � �� t;L��/�. U 6 /I- E ��Gi �C°f(t-� u !1 � /1ittl) Q�tL IC 1 it) Kt!.LC'c (0-el€C'(a? Y�IIt`ZGti��ILZ` 67-1. `� � � 11:7 �C�"��y�;�`t %t U Ott ,6 e�� 4,v-cep cep i u 'I oel;l i.e/ef, (--17111 >1/ bCllr: glint' :-j, _ 2 J Lt.:121.46/2 L4C2 .f-G171. _el-,ti,uvu are -- --I t1 r_ _ vW _ y') hf"<y„ res / i-necoj 41O Co.?lama Commission -- F7 ye ,z<///> S/" c/ l ift e /ex , a /d cyan ix, ea /1,�/j Z [4.-Z;‘ , e /3, /79r /4. � eictG✓/nan GC:2/al L acc i /t 4i, (Lt. LtI'7 Coati(7 ,�cu ld -1) V7 C4ee/ey CO' .i!Jil 1C 1965 /Jga.4 716. EA-.�Lrc7 .. Weld Co. Planning Commission �r if a CO6 �y 4O( /e, / X GI-4;i4 o4..),-/2.4.4.2,i .ek`q I/74017411 -fcl%° azi en. c /a„plxy /C' Cva.474 7 y CCc(c;-, a-'Ace /o JL / G/ a44 C" as i/Cicduz i/r;" -1G-i- rrrw. o'4 Aid `/4-24 Vi tzar fc, 447,7- L E ay, a //a - 7d/ `�/4tQ t . T4 G Cot c yi./ .low?L/t a-n t l�� ilo ,t4, U et/J./(aj aKC a-i 4; ✓G✓Jcc a ,s'id cc/car/ Vd cJ yJ.GGIe On cc ,4 ct o n' a4j2 w ccsn.,z t4 .. gar �i /t(/f(�anif Lcc r(N on 6'cx-+li7,' a-gn- -c_ /�Gvw. 744.6. G of cl a?i ac.c n caa.,& /`y �� Ak_ , /✓rte ari Glint.4 an r7 a 4 a,vre %,v ,, / 7u.&cn d.tt ?d1 :kty cc-41 L cie`l et o to / %'ateyei 12 Vcicwt 21 /elAti),/ �t . / uyI/Gl c,-14.-164-4.t. //. c A Cr.( ct�'� v/ 0 /- X/ caviAr O4 " U/1 t e --YCQec�-�,La-K d `-44,i/c/ c �a ✓ r �/f UL/1 cif i� /GNN9-e.46. awn ,[`-P�l�J` / "p: 1�1j/- -L 4tra'44:411VGN /(441:64 /ell/� � cc„� J/Owa� AAA l Gat/Lei., ce/L� ��C t/nvJcc/.e�yee! Ca A4.4.4 v t a G/evtL a uaL 7%C4 ire /fie a zc �C c f' ✓C�j/ ae .Teve cHam/ !-Ii iGCcurd ` .4-LIJceecc..<2. ". f, -• t, AIN 181988 1 June 13, 1985 -4'104. y. cOLO. Weld County Commissioner Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sir, I am writting concerning the legislation that was passed last December 14, 1984, which limits the number of large animals to two per lot, instead of two per acre as it has been. I believe this is unfair to existing property owners that already have animals, or planned to have them in the future. Two large animals per acre seems fair to me. If you have ten acres, you can support more animals then someone with two acres. The reason for the change escapes me. I don't understand how such an important issue can go before the commission and not be publicized. Not one person that I spoke with knew of such a meeting. If this issue had come to my attention, I would have been present at the meeting. Please reconsider this legislation. Sincerely, Linda D. Fritz 7). _ • .471— cj: Richard A. Fritz 2717 Arabian Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 Weld County 1. V� - Uc-VitatA,\\ we_ 03-0_ mEc. c4Rtu4 \At 4,2 rntur Judi" Su-z_ 30\0\ erwinul ,"(N O. t) euren Cat UXIC arniSt KA WW1 U-6 m 3711:1110, u+51 A WC \\,u* nytov itAt) UN-UN ad, ..)\N\ elAPAONDW-0013) OalPeIyjfx . 1 \\I1. )-0,Almja k Ut 'MAl,B \Th- [t. AQIA Jee , u\s\R J)-Qq_ -\\ .(51 atm_p_ s:„,„ rnfol(t),\Q -i-40) aminalzh cs, ca., ciurc\ J-m-kka A-za- r(v3t , ta-C4 \13-L‘i\a- `A,J v4)4Vil \IOU LINAtuL O,PciSv(a. ALQk 3.53. \C \ *C6S? C)--5\1A1, at LI\C\-9-J1-5) f3mix-3 L am : wtya Vott co\)4_, ,‘" 0.,ThR ( i- Wo- \: ,-e. •Rk) ice, p 1/45 -Gr(1 4 \, nnAlzytnia \.' vjui� \ALVD -IQ \ . O1/4,1 si`(\U\ \i`-'\ 3)\9,_ CA in (ThiTIQA -9-\- \_%, , p 'c„, c ��°� S �.\--c- �X., f Mac ks ck l •\� „�o i ( fi I. JUN 1 8695 GREELEY. coca 6037 24th Street Greeley, Co 80634 June 24, 1985 Weld County Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, Co 80631 Dear Commissioners: We wish to object to the proposed change in Weld County zoning for the number of animal units permitted in residential sub- divisions zoned agriculture being recommended by the Weld County Planning Commission. We appreciate the fact that the current law may not be fair to owners of larger lots e .g. ten or twenty acres. However, the proposed recommendation by the Planning Commission would be just as unfair as the present law by going too far in the opposite direction. Not all residential areas in the County, currently zoned agri- culture , have the same characteristics or circumstances by their proximity to urban areas, type of housing, density, size of lots, and a host of other factors. Therefore , we need zoning provisions which will address this wide diversity of needs and desires of the many homeowners in these areas. We live in an area that has numerous three acre lots. The proposed change will permit four animal units on these lots. But we will not have four animal units on three acres. Instead, we will have four animal units on 1 to 12 acres for the simple reason that on these three acre lots at least 1 to 2 acres are generally devoted to the house , landscaping, driveway, an area for children to play, parking, etc. We believe a better and more reasonable solution to this zoning question is to leave the current zoning provisions in effect for those lots which are less than five acres. For lots, five acres or larger, it does make sense to expand the permitted number of animal units to perhaps as many as those being suggested by the Planning Commission recommendation. We respectfully ask that you consider our point of view and not correct the current problem by creating another one . Yo s ry tr .<� NECK MITT teittilrfi9t D. Ger / E �-�1�-', D ti /// � (t1 Joan A. Gergens JUN 251985 , � nde PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot 1 B. 2 per acre as currently proposed t C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. LY LS lGo�c r <�c �GL- C L a� 6--:-,/-7.411n.-t, -3.3`J/ G Mi? atr O/( K a 05ckt 5 3F I/ 7S' 7 , Ai (: /, ) \"1 / 73-et O -I%J ��k-c ILA:3c J-..�6''- J .:;LLI , . <J2-y7 . 0-,..-__C /9533 - /? 71-dW y �b5or✓ o-y6 VL 7 tic „,,Wecv '.-26#0,-": /9,Y '. /1/7"t4.12,84— S3G 7)'4 i� /7373 Jar tc.: 31 -?2"--I f ; 79y/ 3 /97'i// ca“)).so,� o•1. 1-5-5.71VV/ /ix,-5-s,) F. /9/22k2 v44_4)6 -561/3 c.tine lztek-47 [✓'( i l a`73 E--� /7 77/t6-49)/ A/ i s i et IV i2e ft ' ,(115 / /947/7 7i-AS t un- ec- 5-94, t.14.-fr - Y` (C)45- ( (g,54-___ Eck-Ise-, Ce g,L -426 C, C ...E 1 -o,9.a, (4(4, 1 to s M e f�alo-Li76C) c .3 - fh N4L,Gtas, Cu `3G tf 7 /3 (. 5 9-r-,,) 334 l '73.attiOnlicc b 36, -/ 31 r` `31(7(2 ,,u.) , ,'57 C' ti3 7 ? eG4CL..L!C!c'd ,,,,..�, be I tac.,...6 i,-` 4c - ti,,L, 1 5 56 y�/— ,,z �� 6YZ .ci / I at ( /I S 8 , wie e 2"b'f i-7,O%,,,,, 5 <iS/Z. 1( 11 11 f1 kiH79- Il „Aizi.1'/ t SA ,,1\y",/1/4..e,--ye:2,cc ass\ \,_4(K 111 \- ,Jos ., Cal, s t, c,z;._J /l/ �..�-..--ce j l--t-7/ w' a,12 Gt( 7/(44.,-, e-0 ( > ≥c zt i ce-t e 332( we/c- 4// ti! i4vec .36-9:4, (O e 3 37/ 1QC< L// MMlil1sa-(--c e 63e `/3.3'i c. ViA%C ,% v— 352 —c23 75 lip e9 3 44 7/ f T ' laDa -, IL75� 11/e_ Is36- Ve03 4 /7750 /ig5- i s-3� -7379 �� 7/ ��a.� / 3 / / it P O o /Ot S 4/118 19l3d /9-77- WAY Ati-x-f� X36-17‘ z7 / 1111 ' 0 / `/ ; l(71 AV �-, "G, /C// G , >l, nom C4�eY(�O, . �'.ri.� ICLTh c---.X '. A9 ' RT4 Sox 1209 8ict(ONtcP Cc ; 6S9 - 636 .x' ' 1.,2,-,4 4E, 30/5 kje ea,{1 ac's,--.J eo ! 536-463 '` /26)0 ' (a (/ 3c)/6- Ce`eA? t/ //exl 7 C/ �7%, -5 -82 1 ti / i R- 1 Vcu2 'r / `- ,1 -53(r LPG.33 _Cc 13/0 z i, ' C 0- /5/,4..41-a-j Cj ;Lewd / 0�m f2�In`I11 5/C), G'i,i ^ /744,), 'e - 53-Y£tc U �e / 5_76 </t t /lr e .,'- ',<7,,,/t, 1„1-,./ ! /i�/o (c'C-4' -4 /44,—, jo 5<. ,f /" .a i /1 e:gx,� /972c4 U/6Z �3' //vn:z,c) 10 36 Vs-3C riA`,�r.l',,de /5/a Glc, 1 <'so,� h>�-ys�o 0 ,6.t,Qtt w' _ jSo 1 Wet 'f l kl tliC j� j' 9/5 i �j fit' 6-t.„01_,-2_} '7/> /�;Cf° // ;4 5' 36 �. :2 %i 2��Y /t 77:2 92( C C '`7// ii, ` 'i;v 3� - 912 ic4- C 3c5 GI/� Dti' Ati \ � f w l -''/ �%G j,_ d ",-,/� - �w E � tlt (/ » 6th- C te(11 �6 ' r0cr_r( 14 P4- Cuacw-k J--6 -Yae �� / � '1-C /(JLA_chf'/ '/ /2745-1 /0::3-'44,/0::3-'44,GG,Ch - t/ W''��./>'L <.) � 6- -/�.�1y K � z,u, f0luddre ,(gt 7,C-4,-, 53i 972 .X' e 7mot' /V__6 7/ -- / 95- lAite 3`3G 714.3 —_c.-et, zce Lam , /75 7/- /75z4 �.�. , �e�-4/L'a° ` � r �v l T.4 d'0 GUc /O /A 4:-. O7?-11 :- h 1 LS- - Voss {4, A.A... r r r r Zzl izt�vc-c- 77 ' /966;e) 4s €S4/D,--A 3G-Y‘s J- 6 -tefj ;Du 9, 31 ' Ceti, -kilt 5Jec - x7i 4.1 �� ,��, / �:-2c, (e ��!h/fir �:3�76.1(0�a /a; �a, — , j' f�) : ee,Q61,/ ,/c / 4 S E ' y,, :v ebt-n2c. . Yu.,k.;DG,-ScN2- ✓ , P', N l 3,, /', 1L> £Lc9C)- i-4-Le_ 66 `/ - ‘ `I& '7 dE-0— ' 'A--A-al-o---, /S-S3 ‘ ei,,IVco 6?y ST { 6S `;- 3yos- i Al44, v,., 119i3(CO LC.( Rd, L;51 Is<'' a 3- ' /SS1 6 /ea _'l' h ! 6s-1 Gss , 1 / �/ / � 0 �f7 .i hi 1j j / ; ; /yes? X64 8 �4� i,. /f 526- Gc%c/Tt co, 536 -9226 61i/) - ,>y v/ //'etc// / A4cp i< -SJC-% c-z-t 21,4>, C :el ,e-r,/4'Q-- / V- X3,.2 ' -4, , r-i'ud'u�e l>`J o ;f7 1/. A 3/La L4,, ,,dat� DAfltdso, ss6 %is' a& �. fit . A� 2642 WCE I/ sib- i.30 /17--; 17 -9--- ( / '/ /,//7 � H .'- 7,267 � , )6e.i.i l-A Ct' ,/ ,- 4 l� L—,\-, �/ //n/ / 'r,/C < . 1,i t _ -'� //..7(f (_ 'Y' � � / 2 'L° t)�C //( c) , l�i i ' ' ` ' 7 �LL i�—l � C Z �C a. :! i ,/ d I ii I I I i PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed t C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B"._j Thank you. '711----- l.%7i:(11 "lam C�GC � /Zee2-.0z�_ ! to%4eq wQR 39 6-9(90a`n --� `./403 w4/'N 6 o“-Ea/3 7 Nati 4- el 4c.-7‘41/ A A%5 /17e k r;lG' r5 l--41,/r o/ 222'6 u)eR . ID . (069 64-64 ap�c'e Oa C, a allo 5 cf 8 4s*g cs- ��'�la/2"6-,J :L 07/ 4,4a GJc ' `-{ , /-90asa S 3l -92c PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. /1 �4,7‘ d ,,,/ / i, / 1, r, g4-4-12_,( 2w-tit� ul p i 7 2 , ---- t (?/1c e- / / litc- , L_72-Pe A, dfi-ezi I —. / ' e.„4:, ,/e � �2, „ r „ , , - �,�� v ( I1 / 7 77 7-2-Zce 37 Z. f t/2,.2 L.s:_Fc ---42//,-,._,L,./-(,,t� 5O/2 _+ Gi 2t«t r mac.- /c2,._/..C. .. e 6e ,/ z' cif a(L' 6, -vect.t,��,�S',�ott (#.,24/.,(A(O0-L-)-z - ,actt. 36 ,s-y ti2eacetw,ti O.e._,„c Zeta - L \ , ) / it.:L.- 39:22':, Co4rncccrA isk) r Li A‘" a6-(It 777677-iitic. 3 6 c/,i Scvn w e r�i�� ' �/ �f 1 ; � 1 (Thal 36 // .�7 C -.Q,2 c Le � 1 1/41;'121 owk Q. /7K5y /1T4;ti)4 ki , witid i74: 9_, lair /aka et, be Ce-, ,,, , 7,, / , Qiii / U s id £a cccc� ��i s2eti / �9a3/ u��z� pti� e a Lie �c�43\hraf A/661 9a7r, -42-<-1 r/.2/ .--/-atAc.;-e,""4-7,- aic-ge. +c0 9l pZ oxu.e... „, G4J-c cc - O°ste we.-- 9/ .zittnu- .� /d.loe elv 67 4' A, 4. c,, I7k7c 41C-le /v z A9247e/c& --1 C , 1..___%..,nza 1 L783H Lt.FL i b g rt.t_ r4T 0,... W CC-4-.N eani 'nl /e Al% 39 y 3 w c,( 3 7 Veld 9 3143 IA/ '37 v�klee 4 ' n275 lav7 J . ce /L! - (e, oil,/ ' 1Q lc FA-1a st.i urr., ..D / tL e n -%-j-1644-44 .1{490 a- c-SmAA tA.2� 1.�, �,c�.eQ,O,,. }VAA''"" 851 Ad ith.QDC6. 087 Oca 5 7" 2 -" Yee..-u,`Y _2S0 y 4>cr2. 3 7 (eJo / ..tat�u lc6`E rc2 23-2y' 616/137 CF-60 G'33 w•ee 37 ZW - -(2-_7-21 � z�, - 2 5 217 2. c)r 37 Z-u=-P > � -/" i ,514s kf1c% /P O7 44,,a )4) - II I. I t , if IAL S 99'6-. icicle ( / 3-7 V ,O44 Wee .; 7 4 PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. ,�%ut 7---7 PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as rnrrontlyF 'red C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. 1 S" is AJj- Ng-'1E) _avant- a 163ci3 Lie 237 `'� !- (t.,ip _ cv,).Q "C r2 "\S `l5 -‘-cicck Wit. l.vpt©h I) 1,,(,t, 4cc/ ,1 PIA' / 3 /5c&1cf' F It ZA- ,r ji-J r7 a420-n /3 75 7 A-I C'. R 8 . O194 `-' do. ri,e— 7i' i 7of7y7 �U, C, �.. r /44,, , G - ref71 n V2Q i 7-2} 7 Gu, C, /edit& a, C Bab �1 ,f 4 ,4 , 60.azt, .247q4,-- w-C .4 a / c l'i ia''"^_ (� e &/ 7 . `193 1!/- e/e- c'l- f% zee/.-a,<7 nit° . yd 6 a/I , /DON I'V IA107: /fir -X- 2 qL G(/O, , Z/ A-7 /i' CO/fl, L'z / PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. 9 ,d-e AL) Sat 77 :S (C2/ �.�� PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. / . / ( J , 1..��L f /F �a J,�r �J . 7-2e"7"--0-1/— / 7 C' !y 7 'Fne7tGC,j'Y 1_A..77 :v 7/6/ J,/ c / ? j'u klrlit �Jme, � c) L L, , PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. Xict,La 4cLu4-L, /7757 L Ohre ZlO si_ 342-6/no Ai G,s1 stove Aahr 1 77/10 W d° Ce• ' J 4'6 tyt .,.., La. 6r'9- 8786 028.S /�✓ e'w`e 7- �J16ei-cti /7c- 76 /14.97/1/7u S7 7-1/6yJTGaz w S� G-c tp 9 �L -, ,, /7G 7 k o >-y-o 2,42 41/4\3v\1-ton 657--6 317 ag67 sous" \ t q��_S4,�4a(4) �sq - 6677 4.- 2 7 o^e. avttidetet, • 6,5-7- 64,9 2 tee e i.� /7716 6144/C .,.z� 474041Gs9 49,4%'‘.„vrxop o �a- 197- i9, 3a 53G M' 17-U30 /ys• AU_e1 -0-! (v - `fd'� � �/i 114tae-Lt Or /YScc fit... 5 �9�'D PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. 67:4--4/(7' 27"4/1A-Arnr( t 0 13o , r'3 /- C S p - ��,rs PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. /; Lem 9&, 3 /9 pp c' �ac�s cZ �LJ en C? r � � ah Co (o, c6O / . `/ - /69S— PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. a 6y 1(20EXEL 2766- APPAAwsA .fve Seicuirtiv Cc 10601 V lil e 1-e ✓ (i O a .,e) i�l . ,_�i� L i/ f, gin �'/-��L �-/L- 6 / J / / ?tad cr;.. (/L¢y(/�. 14,-" *) PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. / o3- / 671 0' 63 / bare 4J l OutAla 0203( 17:12-t IT 4f-tr. 0091 ln�� \--•-•*---- C 3Ob2 1 IT 11:1L, C' Uc, thc undersigned, feel_ that s. . , ur.ty -ilnnisLLL Lttel, cluns di : not fulri repro ent she ,ajcrY uy of ?its d ::cu.r.y in th,til decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages . We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in regard to published notices. Cf the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less '„han 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 „er lot Lotsiargs "Than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres pint 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B': Thank you. S % - X6QiSC ,Q2 `�/ �, <1' c `�^,. ✓ / Zin W C I l;Y i spa< :' ,'- "� � 4,-4 P.r. . , 65 ( 3 3 wit.„ 2./ C,Cyv V r r.-Lim eve- 6/704 . .--Gt 4; / 24(24- 1C1- 4, G L ®VG�w V4,\& ;v S2 5S —c- k)c,e i� Luc) u n t, cS - iMu i° :7 Fl i 7 / 7 .0 St :fie/ 04107 '/A AV if/Wray 6 S -?7 -Ile OW/kV-5 FT,4/kv o≤Y/2s-$ a Cli am ' � z ¢w z ; `, /71 auirti-v ax-c. --1- L t, I: A �� i�o iii`° , . R 6 4 „4.6,, C2s9, ? 70, f / ) , -S3-14 /6/63 &c PrrsTzgfijitil Coy-7- 0 C L-Gyuc O T L t,Gt.� �jY ktiell4IX, eat( 11,405 4--- lEirre- Aft HI. At erg BC�t,1 7 ,i7O4C-irCDC) Cv�i6R 1-A%c �oc� - N�cV:�OS)( CO a =1 ii,.a hi cg. `7/ f� aw, &25'Y2 -a Cdf c ( il a z- //pz2 Id C?. .6 4" / (Ci4 a/o c 9i4L /� fo gE 3 02-17 ate¢ e ie2-Yoet4g;,./ do PO 62/ �' Cer-' 74)61,- 7,7 Gam, �i�1 , e'106/I PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. / <, D, acA \c\1G -Lk eu 0O �n 'cG� `772a /.�fl% (icyenv �zzne� � �rzti ,6 7 «- � . X99 ye", cam �6. 9"0�� z �� 4 / nie 1.2 �"""\. ,a,71-- am....--n,tec _d-44,14, 0let-te - t L 7 ii '1) 'a 23&7 "Vailtztoo et.er-4._ 659- yy*f2 F'- Gyy c:-- LL /ti\&-C L c„,, . y5 0 77 a±/i:u zu2 C,L[ e 4 C5 q-A /1 .'/ YC c3 r a 9/ X71,/57-we 1s_ >2s'i - aa1 � �;C' N h f4-1--." te- ifit-Lroc„-- /i6d, --_ai.ce." (,,, 5'7- 72 6--,c oe, 2221.'c.O w C7 L 3 v ---YYj c2.c cn G s 9 7 3 hi b ---+r-re-g-' l/ux .c-4'3 o'c 7 9 6 reActi-� ZS- 7 -Ca 3 (cd 13 - c0 Po /ZietA2L C, 5'- - 0 y z / cl h 2 A s.3 l e } .'� ,�i ,-ft ) gypsy-x3a2 (oS9 t .�,��vs ' 330 ,� ./E,445-7& 6S- 4j1 ?sa 77,,Z17 hA- Esc _ 7 fro 7 G% C (, ,A L . l% �/ ci -//,-,- 7;:� Y,.'E,.r/ /P '�l vi ofC'C/t /-/ , i. =J ,0:72. /Z,C) / J�. '/--At.: J`/ 4 `7'i(2,e„ 6 3 `/ si7)- t PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. (Alt)"1_. / l 7 S bJ C /2d /t4 f4 ecic goc.ci /»f( u, r/rn 8 .044,-e61 a /7/1471 47 a � i ill r /770 3 a)C P(6 yf e� /�/ v (C/ /7403 1c1 a ' (' � ee ore, e/ ?40 3 ��- 3nJGi ,Lo go6o L pazfa,,,) ttt O 6Eo [taw �,�z,.o-4'y4JCt ��k.- �L". s"3 Gc�x-L C��<�� ,�t�L �'7 �'',<� , " Wk -- / Ii-2.•- /60'6 getiadve ab.A. Ai'd-rn -e,- , GLal .."- -S S ".--d- p p 1.d..e '',e.„ . . . r---)_ - _- ''-'c d z.-_,--��..,._,, -e ) _ 3 U.,2/ Vim, /.4 ' . --et -.2..., 5.g4'7 ./ �, 2.f Vc Qom. . 4c c r,-�.f� °, po,„}_e_A_42., 3 , , ,, s/ t -4.7-a, X a `7 Z_._ _ 53 --`-/C G.1_.. iD ,..,..).,_/(4 a. ' d. Y. l,Coo l_..ciQ_c1_._—._ ≤517G4. -R-7__-7 / 9 ,�� , ._ ��_L____._.___.. -_�?,1-Soto 104A--1, --_-L2.1,s-2-- " " _9 1 Ck la--ru-e-e. /.. ,-_ f3 Co-L- e6 66/ , 8-6661 7�r8 61_. . 1 �: 17 --,,x7it14 � FD‘a/ .5`7� J?At' 7 . ." Tr71(1) c 44,...ft-73- - • ,, _.-- -vv‘ 1_.A-esi/Y1 8 }-,/7-ii Lo 20(a0 k L ›'CDGO I. 4_ 536 (1,Sd. ??. _., l/.. y (2- /ie9:5-re ii-k-tecw / - & / :5343S_ 2 . tilt i) 1 5.L0 (c) .C . 1 c1 3 tii;prrNiCo, $moo i 15,.:150.E i___).44..r, -- cDBs-lac, w c le -›___ L _� � 1 • s3Co- yGss� : ..►� __,..._a21,:� Q Iii c..R.___l6_ _ _ - _.. r_ .?d_Lo yJ.. ... ' g te- 4 .1 _g_01c A j_ j -y6 3',z- 1 44111 e- dobicesS C3 / QcFi2 �/ L. IC,&: '1>c, le la`31'f 0'�(:t_i e,i, ' I n, �7 icitiGrYl c (C.K!„,'_j r� 7 /a NY' 8AI YA Qd c' ��.y�;, � J,Y y.., ��as� �l� COLti ��-r s.4y'2/n ;4- 325(6/7-: � Iooc// n rrF-j, z6) /J /24,4 l of ._„3 5 ed " ('c/Z/4e.-,t.,v �,6'Zy -rf / Ltd II 1Z/u. yd 356 -5 Co/1O4 itt;id 2z' �1r,sit ion a.,)2 Al (44O,4 ` 3 779 44 3 7 8t), � / �f wsits ,c/32 74.. 74--z_ _s>.- 4Je // �i�ad' -325/3-325/3 e0i3 7 ,e,` ' `r ' 8v/o/ [c t/c1p (`.1110,A1,;(, ((377qu 'r fcpds-7 3 h#0/) r° y )(IeJC "44161 39/a le,g7 U c Lo Y 6O/ c/O/ 'Lr�s7 11i V1/(2 dt,c62r7 .`,Lit, Cu 404,01 LL;t'"tV ,.:c 104 V ,t-, 4: f, ,:,') 1 -I) I Oj, .1:(A ' ,) (p. PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County id regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. ileete /79Ze 4 121.144, h, "��2/cam l/ /h 3z/ �� a47 3 3e 95-51' /4 PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. GyLOligs ;km/ IL" // `\ G �� J '. a l.,.C/`-'I L.aLNI. K/Cu (J�/.-E..X Q %Jr : ci4 // w Pl;I 10., 'am, oho undersigned, feel that the ::eld County Planning Cen.russion did not fairly represent one majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning commission. A. Jo change to, existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently .proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot r Let:_ larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". m . : you. p eg d `1 BiP 7 3i t ( " - K c' . 7 C/,3c; Acric d . PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. \c /fr:741/1' , ` /7/3771 79 A444, go env ,7(7 T 't " 16eviLs zw,t a° 6 >� ( icy th4Ce se6g, mate J L e V cc/<<2 a i 7` e39li,c6 I Co-Cc - Y3 "?3.7-vs-tF�� 45 00 2- 5(4 sz 1,> i eL y ylaj r,4 6.?G - 6 ��6 7sa - 4 .6- PETITION We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages. We further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices. Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C. Lots less than 3 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B". Thank you. ‘e_, de //7 .7 .2 u- C /tot / Z it f I go A900-77 7% 76,o l4 v/rot ryvcd7ofra-- a 6 01,4-4.7 4 ,r , , c is0,z eirktv, (co 6. X06 $e ( w (70� 57g C14, a l) d() oC 9 f // '°"o Co. c•/// F-4€.- .ero492 / /2_ 1C .4": 7 O� ..7oa7s cc) Cl2q rU651a-- a/ % . /sr eVS A/c/A \\\'\Cp ^p6 bast,-f r1 B ix 1 PS \C�e Yak-1CA -2_OyNect - S rJfl1U or-4..S ��eo,c'1_r J �.�� ( . 3D k-1\ Petition We, the undersigned, feel that the Weld County Planning Commission did not fairly represent the majority of the citizens of Weld County in their decision concerning the number of animal units per acre on subdivided acreages Ws further feel that advertising only in the Johnstown newspaper does not reach the majority of citizens in Weld County in regard to published notices . Of the proposals listed below, we feel that "B" is far superior to the other three and the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. A. No change to existing ordinance 2 per lot B. 2 per acre as currently proposed C'. Lots less thatn 3 acres 2 for the first 3 acres plus 1 per acre above 3 acres D. Lots less than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 per lot Lots larger than 5 acres 2 for the first 5 acres plus 1 per acre above 5 acres We strongly urge you to vote for proposal "B" Thank You chfri 90 10 / 'S jVE' £090 `1Yla YQD A a /G /03 42 c . A9 rya, 1, a /42103 A�#6 .24-4 ` /6903 w,ed , Rd /e 9 4 7 It/. C. 2d ?, 'A seit r 14/ C A Ftkitcy2x,„ Hello