HomeMy WebLinkAbout880320.tiff AH2170554
RESOLUTION
RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO P.U.D. (C-1 ,
C-2 , C-3 , I-1 , I-2, AND OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITIES) -
EDWIN S. KANEMOTO, ET AL.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and H
iA
O N
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 4th day of May, O1'
1988 , at 2 : 00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of
Edwin S . Kanemoto, et al. , 203 South Main Street, Longmont, m
Colorado 80501-6497 , requesting a Change of Zone from A K o
(Agricultural) to P.U.D. (C-1 , C-2 , C-3 , I-1 , I-2 , and oil and
gas production facilities) for a parcel of land located on the z ~
following described real estate, to-wit: o
0 to
Part of the W} NW} , Section 14, Township 2
North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld o
County, Colorado S N
H F'
WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by Vern Nelson, of z o
Nelson Engineers, and nccoo
WHEREAS, Section 28 . 8 of the Weld County Zoning OrdinanceF,
provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the 7
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request n
of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County
Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that 6
this request shall be approved for the following reasons : xi
1 . The applicant has complied with all the application m
requirements listed in Section 28 .5 et seq. , of the Weld CJ
County Zoning Ordinance.
o
2 . The request is in conformance with Section 28 . 8 of theno
Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: p a
a. The proposed PUD District is located within the
1-25 Mixed-Use Development Area . The uses
associated within the PUD are consistent with the
uses shown on the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area
Conceptual Land Use Plan map in the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan.
PL 04/as
880320
Page 2
RE: COZ - KANEMOTO
b. Uses allowed in the PUD District will conform with
the performance standards of the PUD District
contained in Section 35 .3 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
c. Central Weld County Water District will provide mm
water service to the proposed PUD district. The o
St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer ,p N
service to the proposed PUD District.
oa
d. I-25 East Frontage Road will provide two accesses
tg
to the proposed PUD District. The Colorado n
Division of Highways has recommended conditional o
approval in its letter of April 4 . The conditions z
of approval include relocating the northern access, z o
access turn lane improvements , and the dedication cn
of additional right-of-way along the east side of Oa
the frontage road.
[n o
e. The subject site is not located in an overlay ern --
district and does not contain any known commercial z o
mineral deposits. Geological conditions may affect
n co
development of the site . A soil and foundation r
investigation and a drainage study to identify
specific geologic conditions is a requirement of
the PUD Plan application.
Pi NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County o
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of o
Edwin S . Kanemoto, et al. for a Change of Zone from A
(Agricultural) to P.U.D. (C-1 , C-2 , C-3 , I-1 , I-2 , and oil and gas ni• -rn
production facilities) on the above referenced parcel of land be, • o
and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: m 0
r
1 . Prior to recording the PUD District Plat: t7
n
a. The applicant shall submit a signed agreement with v.
Ms . Rose Hafferber. Ms. Hafferber represents Ms.
Mary Befus or the devisees of her interest in the 0 a
oil and gas mineral rights on the proposed PUD
District. In the event an agreement is not
reached, the applicant may submit application
materials coordinating oil and gas production
facilities within the PUD District. The agreement
or supplemental application materials shall be
approved by the Department of Planning Services
staff.
880320
Page 3
RE: COZ - KANEMOTO
b. The northern access shown on the PUD District plat
shall be relocated 100 feet to the south to achieve
better separation from Weld County Road 22 .
mw
c. A 60-foot-wide access easement across the east o
property line of Lot 14 shall be shown on the PUD .a n,
District plat.
t
2 . Access turn lane improvements and the dedication of n
additional right-of-way along the east side of the o
frontage road shall be addressed as a PUD Plan
z -,
requirement. ui
C .a
3 . The plan to detain stormwater on each individual lot is
acceptable . However, an overall drainage plan for the y o
PUD District must be completed as a PUD Plan hy �
requirement. Hz o
CO
CO
4 . As part of the PUD Plan application, a site specific
soil test shall be conducted to determine if any x H
possible problem exists from radon gas. If a survey R, :'
identifies a radon gas problem, all structures and x o
facilities shall be designed and constructed utilizing n
radon gas reduction techniques . o
d
t� to
5 . The following notes shall be placed on the PUD District o
plat prior to recording: o0
d
a. A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with p
Section 33 .4 . 5 and 34 . 3 . 5 of the Weld County Zoning •
0
Ordinance. n o
o
b. All streets within the PUD District are private and
shall be maintained by the PUD District property
owner.
880320
Page 4
RE: COZ - KANEMOTO
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 4th day of May,
A.D. , 1988 .
/7 :' �,, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS m W
ATTEST: • r�� , . WE COUNTY, COLORADO o r
• ;NJ k ..k a N
Weld Co Iy Ali ~ N
qt G1eYk a� 'Recorder ^ a'
and Clef.,s o the `Board ne R. Bran ner, Chairman
• o
BY. ry /( . . ..�e a C.W. K Pr Tem z
eputy dint Clerk z
EXCUSED mo
im
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jacgue7 ' e J nso m c+
7
Ca
/ [� cn• o
Go d Za CI n>
County Attorney 9., - „ " '-l/ z o
Frank "Yamaguchi n m
✓ w
m
W
xr
w
F-,
X10
LI
n
0
z
a
til En
;d o
• o
VI a
a
n
O a
p
n• o
880320
HEARING CERTIFICATION
DOCKET NO. 88-13
IRE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO PUD (C-1, C-2, C-3, I-1,
AND I-2 USES) - EDWIN S. KANEMOTO, ET AL.
A public hearing was conducted on May 4, 1988, at 2:00 P.M. , with the
following present:
Commissioner Gene Brantner, Chairman
Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Pro-Tem
Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson - -Excused
Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy
Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi
Also present:
-Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff
Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison
Planning Department representative, Rod Allison
The following business was transacted:
2 hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated March 28, 1988, and
duly published March 31, 1988, in the Johnstown Breeze, a public
-hearing was conducted to consider the request of Edwin S. Kanemoto, et
al. for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD with C-1, C-2,
C-3, I-1, and I-2 uses. Chairman Brantner informed those present that,
only four Commissioners being present, if this hearing should result in
-a tie, the absent Commissioner would review the record and listen to
the tape prior to casting the deciding vote. Lee Morrison, Assistant
County Attorney, made this matter of record. Rod Allison, representing
the Planning Department, entered the favorable recommendation of the
Planning Commission into the record and said the Planning staff has
recommended a change in Condition #1(a) . Vern Nelson, of Nelson
Engineers, represented the applicants. Mr. Nelson requested that
Condition #1(c) be amended by deleting reference to Lot 14 and
substituting different terminology, and requested that Condition #1(a)
be changed to allow the development of oil and gas within the PUD
District. Larry Jacobs, speaking on behalf of the mineral owners, said
they concurred with the Planning staff on the proposed wording of
Condition #1(a) . Mr. Allison said it would not be necessary to change
Condition #1(c) , although the lot number could be changed on the Final
Plat. Discussion was held concerning the inclusion of oil and gas as a
right. Mr. Allison suggested that the Change of Zone include oil and
gas production facilities among the uses in the event the agreement
referred to in Condition #1(a) cannot be reached. Following this
discussion, Commissioner Lacy moved to approve this request for a
Change of Zone, subject to the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the changes recommended by the Planning staff. Seconded
by Commissioner Kirby, the motion carried unanimously.
880320
Page 2
CERTIFICATION: COZ - KANEMOTO
This Certification was approved on the 9th day of May, 1988.
APPROVED:
2r ,/.7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: WEL UNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder M
and Clerk to the Board Gene R. Brantne , C airman
�By• 1 1771/�nt-c e 4C-2
/ eZilf/ (2/
J Deputy County C re-
C.W. Kirby, Pro-Tedc
EXCUSED
Jacque nso
• Y
Frank Yamaguchi
TAPE #88-21
DOCKET #88-13
PLO425
88O320
A S T E N D A N C E R E C O it D
PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name 9f the applicant
or Docket # for the hearing vnu are attending.
TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: MAY 4, 1988
DOCKET #88-13 COZ, A to PUD, EDWIN S. KANEMOTO, ET AL.
DOCKET 488-16 USR-EXOTIC BIRDS & ADDITIONAL RESIDENCE FOR ANIMAL TRAINING & BOARDING
FACILITY, DAVID & -ANNE CALVIN
DOCKET #88-17 AMEND USR TO INCLUDE -STORAGE AND AN ADDITIONAL DWELLING, DALE BARR
DOCKET #88-15 USR-LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION, GRAND MESA EGGS, INC.
NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING
` t ) 371 S Stn i / e 3oO (yrea/:.7 A/474 fl/)?A ,S7k7--is—
dtivy Pre f.-, T 93/ so-, - 2,7A ••77--, z&- /,
Alf"/V hl/_FF 63S Al ] t`4fr /i«7a-,q7q"/ 19...,.P C`��,.--...c- ,„_,7‘2,-.-e
CZpn Mn� d�\` `\ �J�P�.��/L q 9 jv�� 1 c< �c1� i..6,...t a (Li c3
Aga..% ICP, ,a '7o 9c Al./EIp c 107,`2t7? 2-nAt ia-e T a lo,
a �� c M Ja-�{�C ielo 4,26.--em 45,11, IS.1)07 (g( nktlad et- 4) &)c,d3
Lar/'7 r lbk�siS- df)U c... Ail-tree/ S L! 2p O-„ r So_irr a
cr ', 1 ;zb✓,c. CO owe ?444 At-
Logia li //Mogi roe, MO /2X z.4 4a 6g.is-
T? ,-_---,-„,4,-... )3 : 7 r6L4 - c,<), r )J.4,75 , 9 a-8 .'
al ,e,'4 4e-7740-to Gds S /.I14/A! 3 Z tove,,srav'r aji, (.T
✓b a J. ,) IiG Ci11n4 .u ✓' 1k,,DILI::ro C4-9 eti� te4l �'1 .7> -'.- )
tf-� ' t,�r ,.De ii 7;? 0), C, f 21// r 2 : s l
i2 ?��rr' l/LA way ' lr� ,a at 6�
\t it()
aof� 73 (►�0 ec�,L ,f Hc�/c1�, .PL �, ('C.. -23 -i-5, 28-is
'
r l +✓/�4 J11✓/'7�./4.,,--7-
/I % �.;� �i..�� ,�' ✓T�l'ur�Z Co 73 ; s 1
o •
rs 1
23Z[ , li,�d/4%1. In � /°! 0ri'<J`C IS" BUJ
f �j i C9 XU 66 - /
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
April 19, 1-988
Page 2
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. No further -discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to Toll the members of the Planning
Commission for their _decision. Ivan Gosnell - yes; Bud Halldorson - yes;
LeAnn Reid - yes; Louis (Rademacher - yes; Paulette Weaver - yes; Lynn
Brown - yes; Ann Garrison - yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: S-290 (Continued from the March 1 , 1988, -Planning Commission
Meeting.)
APPLICANT: Don Baldridge
REQUEST: To -create a 4.5 acre, more or less, lot with a PUD District Using
the Final Planned Unit Development Plan application process.
LEGAL _DESCRIPTION: Tart of the Si of Section 5, and part of the Ni of
Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th T.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
ICCATION: Approximat-ely 2.75 miles -east -of Longmont; south of and adjacent
to Colorado Highway 119.
Rod -Allison stated this case was continued to -allow the applicant to submit
materials re-quested by the Planning -Commission at the March 21 , 1988,
meeting.
APPEARANCE:
Neither the applicant nor the applicant's representative -were present.
Therefore, this request will be moved further down on the agenda.
CASE NUMBER: Z-445
APPLICANT: Edwin S. Eanemoto, et al _
REQUEST: -A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (C-1, C-2, E-3, I-1,
and I-2) uses.
-LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} of the NW of Section 14, T2N, R68W of
the -6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and east of and
adjacent to the East 7-25 Trontage Road.
APPEARANCE:
LaVerne Nelson, T.E. , Nelson Engineers, -represented the applicant . _This
request is for a change of zone for a -Planned Unit Development which would
allow commercial and industrial uses. _The Letter from the Gadding Ditch
Company was reviewed.
The Chairman asked Mr. Nelson if the recommendation and conditions as
presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff had been reviewed?
Mr. Nelson stated they have and they have no real problems with them.
XH/B/I 880'320
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission
April 19, 1988
Tage 3
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked that the recommendations and conditions be filed with the
summary as a permanent record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Iouis Rademacher moved Case Number Z-455 for Edwin S. Ranemoto, et al, for a
change of zone from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development for commercial
and industrial uses be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with
the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the
recommendation and conditions as presented by the staff and the testimony
heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ivan
Cosnell.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission fcr their decision. Ivan Gosnell — yes; Bud Halldorson — yes;
LeAnn Reid — yes; Louis Rademacher — yes; Paulette Weaver — No, because she
does not believe this is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and would
not he compatible with the Interstate Highway uses . Lynn Brown - yes; Ann
Garrison - yes. Motion carried with six voting for the motion and one
voting against the motion.
LASE NUMBER: S-290 (Continued from the March 1 , 1988, Planning
Commission Meeting.)
APPLICANT: Don Beldridge
REQUEST: To create a 4.5 acre, more or less, lot with a PUD District Using
the Final Planned Unit Development Plan application process .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the S§ of Section 5, and part of the N} of
Section 8, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
LOCATION: Approximately 2.75 miles east of Longmont ; south of and adjacent
to Colorado Highway 119.
APPEARANCE:
John McCarty, P.F. , McCarty Engineering Associates, represented the
applicant . The applicant has resubmitted the application to conform with
the recomnendetiois of the staff and the Planning Commission. The only
deviation from the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations at this time
is connecting to a public sewer system ar:d putting the final notes on the
subdivision plat.
880320
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Louis Rademacher that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be '` 3,Res4,1 erd.-b5icg$im Weld
County Planning Commission that the application for: `� -
•
CASE NUMBER: Z-442
�(
APR 2 2 1988
NAME: Edwin S. Kanemoto, et, al.
ADDRESS: 203 South Main Street, Longmont, CO 80501 �s•`- o °
REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) for C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) , C-2 (General
Commercial) , C-3 (Commercial) , I-1 (Industrial), and I-2
(Industrial) uses.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} of the NW} of Section 14, T2N, R68W of
the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and east of and
adjacent to the East 1-25 Frontage Road.
The Weld County Planning Commission recommends that this request be approved
for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the application
requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
— The proposed PUD District is located within the I-25
Mixed-Use Development area. The uses associated within the
PUD are consistent with the uses shown on the I-25 Mixed Use
Development Area Conceptual Land Use Plan map in the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan.
- Uses allowed in the PUD District will conform with the
performance standards of the PUD District contained in
Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
- Central Weld County Water District will provide water service
to the proposed PUD district. The St. Vrain Sanitation
District will provide sewer service to the proposed PUD
District.
— I-25 East Frontage Road will provide 2 accesses to the
proposed PUD District. The Colorado Division of Highways has
recommended conditional approval in its letter of April 4.
The conditions of approval include relocating the northern
access, access turn lane improvements, and the dedication of
additional right-of-way along the east side of the the
frontage road. {
80ri
-Edwin S. Kanemoto, et, al.
Z-442
Page 2
- The subject site is not located in an overlay district and
does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits.
Geological conditions may affect development of the site. A
soil and foundation investigation and a drainage study to
identify specific geologic conditions is a requirement of the
PUD Plan application.
These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this
request, and the responses of referral entities which have reviewed this
request.
The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon
the following:
1. Prior to recording the PUD District Plat:
- The applicant shall submit a signed agreement with Ms. Rose
Hafferber. Ms. Hafferber represents Ms. Mary Befus, who has
an interest in the oil and gas mineral rights on the proposed
PUD District. The agreement shall terminate the right to
drill for oil and gas on the surface of the proposed PUD
District. The agreement shall be approved by the Department
of Planning Services' staff.
- The northern access shown on the PUD District plat shall be
relocated 100 feet to the south to achieve better separation
from Weld County Road 22.
- A 60 foot wide access easement across the east property line
of Lot 14, shall be shown on the PUD District plat.
2. Access turn lane improvements and the dedication of additional
right-of-way along the east side of the frontage road shall be
addressed as a PUD Plan requirement.
3. The plan to detain stormwater on each individual lot is acceptable.
However, an overall drainage plan for the PUD District must be
completed as a PUD Plan requirement.
4. As part of the PUD Plan application, a site specific soil test shall be
conducted to determine if any possible problem exists from radon gas.
If a survey identifies a radon gas problem, all structures and
facilities shall be designed and constructed utilizing radon gas
reduction techniques.
880320
Edwin S. Kanemoto, et, al.
Z-442
Page 3
5. The following notes shall be placed on the PUD District Plat prior to
recording:
- A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with Section
33.4.5 and 34.3.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
- All streets within the PUD District are private and shall be
maintained by the PUD District property owner.
Motion seconded by Ivan Gosnell.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Ivan Gosnell Paulette Weaver
Bud Halldorson
LeAnn Reid
Louis Rademacher
Lynn Brown
Ann Garrison
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
-do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on April 19, 1988, and recorded in Book No. XI of the proceedings of the
said Planning Commission.
Dated the 20th day of April, 1988.
1,c,
Bobbie Good
Secretary
880-12'0
IYVENTCRY OF ITFY.S -SUBMITTED FOR CONS:DEPATION
Case Number t— L-145 5 Tnbmitred or Pren.i.red
Prior
to Hearing At Henririg
1. AppJitation .7 Pages /�
v
2. _Application plat(s) / -page(s)
. 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet
4. DPS Recommendation
5. DPS Surrounding Propery Ormer `:ailing List
6. DPS Mineral Owners Mailing List v/
7. DPS ;taps Prepared by Planning technician ,/
8. DPS Notice of -Hearing w/
9. DPS Case Summary Sheet v
10. DPS Field -Check V
11. fhe r,LF/ ✓rete�ki i 3/J21t
12. S f1uhtt,+d;& TP t4 ovr �•r la, 1 , /e4 t 34970-
, t�
i/
13. eT ^z1-� e. / M Z3
C,14. ,D,V. S' !r'`7^ti`' �, .�e �^-/ fir, /
15.G7 :kLCo ., e- //r i23/ ✓
16.LcrOnn I &rde ti f rt / P t/
N
� ��rJcct f4pr. ? f V
18.1k4 1" tG t4evG's fl1.vt11 j) V
19.arn�," fir P.ctr et intact 2,/ V
20. It 11 t t t /11441. 25- d/
`
I hereby certify that the 2.3 items identified herein were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission
hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the
Board's office on 19 7Cu r /ent Planner
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF VELD )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE NE THIS p' DAY OF alox.LA
19818
SEAL
• NO ARY PUBLIC �PA�2�
My Commission Expires Feb. 13, 1989 8QC;.'90
EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
Case 6425/19- /�c�/y� B"
Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Descripti-on
12,A
B. - ' iyv�Y��fC1 5/ /)./t�/YiJ'+/� O�2QC.ai
.5/
✓ Y
D.
E. ? jr2 rz7 071�7XecuSe si i Jx /2."-CeyJ y/te.-S4Cal,
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
880320
Date: April 19, 1988
CASE NUMBER: Z-442
NAME: Edwin S. F.anemoto, et, al.
ADDRESS: 203 South Main Street, Longmont, CO 80501
REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUP (Planned Unit
Development) for C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) , G-2 (General
Commercial) , C-3 (Commercial) , I-1 (Industrial) , and I-2
(Industrial) uses.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tart of the W} of the NWI of Section 14, -T2N, R68W tf
the 6th P.M. , Weld _County, Color-ado
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and east of and
adjacent to the East 1'25 Frontage Road.
The Department of Planning Services ' staff recommends that this request be
approved for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the -application
requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
The proposed PUP District is located within the I-25
Mixed-Use Development area. She uses associated within the
PUP are consistent with the uses -shown on the I-25 Nixed Use
Development Area Conceptual land Use Plan map in the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan .
Uses allowed in the PUP District will conform with the
performance standards of the PUP District contained in
Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
- Central Weld County Water fitrict will provide water service
to the proposed -PUP district: The St. Vrain Sanitation
District will provide sewer service to the -proposed FIT
District.
- I-25 East Frontage Road will -provide 2 acme-sses to the
proposed PUP District . The Colorado Division of Highways has
recommended conditional approval in its letter of April 4 .
The coimitions of approval include relocating the northern
access, access turn lane improvements, and the dedication of
additional right-of-way along the east -side of the the
frontage road.
88C-720
-Edwin S. Kanemoto, et, al.
2-442
-Page 2
— The subject site is not located in an overlay district and
does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits.
Geological conditions may affect development of the site. A
soil and foundation investigation and a drainage study to
identify specific geologic conditions is a requirement of the
PUD Plan application.
These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this
request, and the responses of referral entities which have reviewed this
request.
The Department of Planning Services' staff recommendation for approval is
conditional upon the following:
1 . Prior to recording the PUD District Flat:
- The applicant shall submit a signed agreement with Ms. Rose
Hafferber. Ms. Hafferber represents Ms. Mary Befus, who has
an interest in the oil and gas mineral rights on the proposed
FIT, District . The agreement shall terminate the right to
drill for oil and gas on the surface of the proposed PUD
District . The agreement shall be approved by the Department
of Planning Services ' staff.
- She northern access shown on the PUTT District plat shall be
relocated 100 feet to the south to achieve better separation
from Weld County Road 22. ,
- A 60 foot wide access easement across the east property line
of Lot 14 , shall be shown on the PUP District plat.
2. Access turn lane improvements and the dedication of additional
right-of-way along the east side of the frontage road shall be
addressed as a PUD Plan requirement .
1 . The plan to detain. stermwater on each individual lot is acceptable.
However, an overall drainage plan for the PUD District must be
completed as a PIT Plan requirement.
4 . As part of the FLT Plan application, a site specific soil test shall be
conducted tc• determine if any possible problem exists from radon gas.
If a survey identifies a radon gas problem, all structures and
facilities shall he designed and constructed utilizing radon gas
reduction techniques.
Edwin S. T:anemoto, et, al.
Z-442
Page 3
5. The fciiowirg rotes shall he placed on the PUP District Flat prior to
recording:
- A Site Plan Review is required in accordance with Section
,3.4 .5 and 34.3.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
- All streets within the PUD District are private and shall be
maintained by the PUP District property owner.
•
880320
rep,- `�')�' cote
ccato ��`11)()
sti
ROY R.ROMER Q� `� ? (Ei
C WE-88-0021)
GOVERNOR *� �,� *i JOHN W ROLD
}/ DIRECTOR
\''../876_x/
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
-15 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING- 1313 SHERMAN STREET
DENVER. COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611
April 7, 1988
Mr. Rod Allison
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Mr. Allison:
RE: Z-445, DEL CAMINO CENTER
We have reviewed the plat and attendant information for the proposed
subdivision. Geologic conditions that may affect development of the site
include potentially collapsing soils, shallow bedrock, potential perched
ground water, erosion, and potential radon gas hazard.
The main concern on the site is the potential for damage to buildings and
roads as a result of the interaction of adverse soil conditions and surface
and subsurface water. Because of the shallow bedrock, landscape watering and
leakage from the Flume Ditch will add to percolation from precipitation to
create a perched water table. If the water table rises high enough to affect
the soils on which buildings are founded, settlement will probably occur.
Consideration should be given to subsurface drainage along sewer lines, the
use of sumps, and lining of the Flume Ditch where it crosses the property
(assuming it is not already lined) . Also, a surface drainage management plan
should be designed and implemented to minimize soil collapse and erosion.
Bedrock on the site appears to be the Fox Hills Sandstone (covered by a thin
layer of eolian sands) . This formation is documented as containing
radioactive deposits in other areas of Weld County. Although we have no
record of any radioactive deposits on this property, there is the potential
for radon gas emanating from unmapped deposits. We, therefore, recommend that
structures be built utilizing radon gas reduction techniques or be tested
after construction, but prior to occupancy, and any necessary remedial
measures undertaken.
In conclusion, if site-specific soils tests are conducted, a surface drainage
plan is designed and implemented, and the radon gas hazard is addressed, we
have no objection to the approval of this application.
Sincerely,
/ / 880320
UITrli =I , 1;.7717 1h pj
Candace L. Jochim L
Engineering Geologist �.
bcr:CLJ-88-057 GEOLOGY
3756/2 STORY OF THE PAST KEY TO THE FUTURE t6i11
ti
" '
o-r , ; Ot LONG
iki rte— lP a .� •A .
Vy wry i
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Civic Center Complex / Longmont, CO 80501
(303) 651-8330 O`14 R A9O
April 5, 1988
Mr. Rod Allison, Principal Planner n/2iI 5Y1[ W,1
17
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street 13 APR 14 1988 I
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: CASE NUMBER Z-445
't161 tu. �'lAOdoie aeema+A"im
Dear Mr. Allison:
Thank you for sending the change of zone from A (Agricultural ) to PUD
(Planned Unit Development) for Del Camino Center to the City of Longmont for
our review and comment. Please refer to the City's previous comments on the
PUD Sketch Plan for this development (dated February 11, 1988) . I note that
the applicant has addressed several of our previous comments in this
application.
There are some comments we would like to reiterate at this time, although
I understand that they are issues which will be detailed at a later stage of
Weld County's development review process . First, as mentioned in our earlier
comments, the City supports quality landscaping along the I-25 corridor, and
we look forward to the detailing of such a plan which this application
indicates will occur in the future. Second, the City appreciates the fact
that access to the lots will be from the private local roadway system rather
than from the frontage road. The City respectfully suggests that this concept
be expanded to include the excluded parcel which abuts Lots 14, 16, and 20.
If an access easement were provided between this parcel and the private local
roadway system, this parcel could be "integrated" into the PUD. Of course, if
this were to occur, this property ownerwould need to participate in whatever
mechanism is used to ensure maintenance of the private local roadways .
Again, the City of Longmont appreciates the opportunity to comment. If
you have any questions , please call either Froda Greenberg or me at 651-8330.
Sincerely,
t4(4:11:P(AVIA(t\ Llir-6 -
Marta Bromschwig, AICP `
Planning Director 1
FG/gp
File: #2050-32a
880a 20
Date: April 11, 1988
CASE NUMBER: Z-442
NAME: Edwin s. Kanemoto, et al
ADDRESS: 203 South Main Street, Longmont, CO 80501
REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUD (C-I , C-2, C-3, I-1,
and I-2 uses) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} of the NW} of Section 14, T2N, R68W of
the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and east of and
adjacent to the East I-25 Frontage Road.
Planning Commission Function
To Make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners based on the
information in Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
Project Overview
-Proposed Zone District: PUD for C-1, Neighborhood Commercial; C-2, General
Commercial; C-3, Commercial; I-1 , Industrial; and I-2, Industrial.
_Size of parcel: 72 acres, more or less
Number of proposed lots: 20
Average lot size: 3.6 acres, more or less
Water: Central Weld County Water District
Sewer: Saint Vrain Sanitation District
Access: 2 accesses from I-25 East Frontage Road
Streets: Private local Streets. The private street will be
paved, 40 feet in width, with a 60 foot
right-of-way.
Parking: Each lot will provide private parking areas. No
on-street parking.
Fire Protection: Longmont Fire Protection District
Police Protection: Weld County Sheriff's Department
Landscaping: Each lot will meet the requirement in the Weld
County zoning Ordinance for landscaped areas.
Possible Issues: Mary Befus, c/o Rose Eafferber, holds 1/2 interest
in the oil and gas mineral rights.
Referral agencies who have returned specific recommendations are included in
this case summary.
The Department of Planning Services has not received any objections to this
request.
88C320
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: Z-445 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 8, 1988
NAME: Edwin Kanetmoto
REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to PUT (Planned Unit
Development) .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} NWi of Section 14, T2N, R68W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: South and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and east and adjacent to
I-25 East Frontage Road.
LAND USE: N Weld County Road 22, Flatiron
F, A residence, oil and gas production, and agricultural
production.
S Two residences, a large metal building, and agricultural
production.
W Two residences, I-25 East Frontage Road, and I-25.
ZONING: N C-3 (Commercial) , A (Agricultural)
E A (Agricultural)
S A (Agricultural)
W A (Agricultural)
COMMENTS:
Two accesses to the property are planned from 1-25 East Frontage Road. The
Flume Ditch runs east and west across the northern portion of the property.
The balance of the property is used from agricultural production. There are
no improvements on the property. The north half of the property drains to
the north (Weld County Road 22, Flume Ditch) . The south part of the
property drains to the south and east.
.....
By: ...
Rod Allison
Principal Planner
_- ., _... 25 I __. -- -
•• a tea_•y t •` • REAF a _ •
Z
34 1 •`
I ,: , ell
. I* •32 rT`3N pp .� 3 1,.
30 • q��•l, I, �•.� I �' �:� •71.)••
. • E ' 4ji'"
�OJCr u5 an raa x_.- . As •°L• •42 •• a L A•• \I I.a ' •••• I q Ei4cte, 11 I• • , • of-::o.: ` l o :.w . .°•0 .r. , •
>4 ff
bin an eSo x• I z' • " zv x� x. xa
• .h 1 S\- p l o
28 _ �= i • • a.. • •O� ei�r•°
} • , ) )) )° ° • )a ) ° )x '4 ' /J n
�' �BARBOUR �ONOS !r:32)
I 32
V ' 4.3" �1'
26 • V • 1 % • R . . -RECD ° •j A �.
24 ro aosoa.ok/z • 'u^� 91.\°I _•° 11tl^p As c� �YI{r�y 1 • ) • \l 1 \/°.
IJCT u5}/r fa, •°40 •i..e. \ •°i. r *Claw I eat. •° • •
°� • • • , .o .ate • •°
12 0 r/t • _ of \
I
o
.1
{1 xr L
18 ._ i I 0o' ,Coco l':iz. •lti • Il p° aTeT;-'8.
•
' •
'I od. 1 :VA N51:0,,•1 1 xe i 27 II
•
16 8 6 "'San I IPO
� . 4 1 I of Y • • •I Gar '3. C °k-
•
'�14 -- xls.L.r- sJr, , , i S 22E) ! ,i1 : � '
• !/ • � •
!a TX. e oocoi8 VI 1/J/'lc • )t • ! o • r Iil.•l
°a /. i ,x . IYY ) 53 1:�.'.CI 4 s.Cr .
12 `,) r JJJ . ' - ' a ° . •
W — � •• j•• #ACgTEtt$ n5I0°,1 i ; I 1 . •
. , I�• 1
f x I 9 zi. ICI r i I ,r•' f)
J % a qE. � I ° '•�� z • 1 Ar o°a .�� n n • 1 to • . ;.
8 ,, Toro 1 .\ + , 1 •: •�
t it N �j- •.._. NNaar .., Y-. y'I — , •I ./,.' •
.ii� 20 xl 4M� . )I / 'n ex ' t z �i i ° • ) . , •• i iiP
rk i xz /I x) , .•••) 24 to F° 3, /• • ° °
6 _ — / ^I •-, yl Cone/ �io • 4 •
/ N• / -. L.-• 04l TFNEIE✓IIG .I
v =a Ijz. '. )o Gn I z4 t'L• ° •.:.' 1 aii
CI il
•
•
• • •r' ,i at )) a ). I N
2 . .c•oo h•�}! - '^ •• \. C1 (> `r. V. cease •°1 )1 iu .,▪ •I . .
l• t 4 i Nih) W >✓ P 1) ' N I N --c 1 k ,../
'R.66� +°' ; 67
,a Y. A D A M S.a.e.4: . ""�
4ai 2
Gravel Pit Cr'
1 0j1
/
4849 @ /,,---1� V
1
1c9Y7
rt + c
P A
_ CD1 cc F @O 1 \ 4850
4856 •
al
--_= 10 _ �`z� �
� 1
b � vs, eon - �� �
i 1 / 9
� i RI nVzlle �
•_ z,..,. — V • _
-- — �e ,— mange— 1
L 'a92 -_ �aB?
\ i1 - i v
__ "� Flu•ne _ -
at/ ro+r / �_1 DR^h I
I
b Wrw f °wem iT _ A o
�� y (. .,
�—.
_
6� _ o
16� : 4 14
1• // M \ I
O O 0
t7 —� 1 (�
1 — _
488 _ A• 1
BMI / " Via. � s y x.�+. ,^µy
4892 - f —_ ��— f — 't w i ...w�.a„',�. �, > __
1 o 4420 - -'- 1
° 4925 ..N -
1 i / — ° cam" �AId N�aims v �.
1
1 / / / 0 22_ b ,1 2 __-hDail Sch 1 -
� �s9so 1 • — 24
21/ ?/•• 22/7 . • / 1 t % ��-
j� o9O v-s' / r----/ 24 Firestone...
_ er 1 I _ - N,Lake
o
p9�
i Dum b C� co
° d40 .,..—____...,..___ .H....._____________� 949 �._-- I \. `
i
1I v , cz — —�9 — Ao_
I
a9A
11 ! /J a ri�
1
ar +Vak i_,tY Sr t _ t Mme"
Tie ♦oat I* . • 1®®P- 1 `
Qatar
rF' tt ` r .,.:
. .rte -/ � ett :.. ~
y,, - ki:a".,";+ 4 A....r tom
^.. .1J — -..T a^h :' a i.) i . ,n. 7' -
tk f
/ ,, a Y `,• aia3
t
tl
i 'b ri 5 ai CI y
//C N41{,$:„
�'" !,t'' x ate.- .• ':. t ....t;` . 1, I, '' i�h� ' :
T . . a $ $ to 4 S" '1' .�f *,i
¢� � � r rd ?`x aa, DJ*,
., -z6 ♦ +; s �:! ,�^,qh.„+ x'67 • ,Y...12412..“7.7±,Wat? ;1, ? 1.;;;;7
.a y4a�t'° f i.-a ill:*
tl r A as
� .
II.
Fgu • xi as rc .r►) altt 4 .‘t''.y Sws ,
t r &{k' �§ -
3 "'tMn -_a.ht . ,xz ₹ _ ;r 't�q �y. ta i'4k' -e$i a +. . .. • . .}
C ly
*' J"t' ?� t '..'� ' y}. ✓Wy +1 7 "C1 wyxv�y b o� ut "..' �
00
x.:. ,.*e..6i..i `' .M
' 1
. J h.i.i...tf"4 d' K .J s.} `G+ ° ek v '{ :IVADiii' r J AG i 7.
rt.), :t I1 r. I'Flt ...,..i.,4‘..11.;0 14 r... Me , si, J } ♦
•
y
tt �l, 4 i.i.,y,l wit•
�",; ...•..�.a- 'to. , 214'
* 4:'
• 4.{- + , T"' ., i ,...44.4t,“:.‘ -1 ,. 'Fie+ ,. '.,./. .�i i
7 / 1t b / f r
t.CO/e ' /a-G2�7 t
-- ice ji{•
.. ». ,,rwa++•' r •TF"iPI—
zrt
yy/. )�+ .774.".;-;;;;;kill +'�iF, jam,. a
(
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: Edwin S. Kanemoto, et al CASE NUMBER: Z-445
SENT REFERRALS OUT: March 21, 1988 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 5, 1988
NO SR MR NO S j a
XI X County Attorney (plat only) ® X Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co
X X Weld County Health Dept. c/o Mr. Ken Neff
635 North 7th Avenue
rf X Engineering Department P.O. Box 1C7
Brighton, CO 80601
i o X Weld County Sheriff's Department 0 _ X Colorado Geological Survey
c/o Mr. Rick Dill, Undersheriff c/o Ms. Candace Jochim
Mineral Fuels Section
! o X Tri-Area Planning Commission 1313 Sherman Street
Attention: Ms. Rebecca Marker 1 Denver, CO 80203
P.O. Box 363
Frederick, CO 80530
XXX Army Corps of Engineers
4 c/o Mr. Terry McKee Ye+bt\
/7/K�
y X State Highway Department 9307 State Highway 121
x j 1420 2nd Street Littleton, CO 80123-6901
Greeley, CO 80631
•
A X Mr. Louis J. Rademacher
O X Colorado Division of Wildlife
Planning Commission Member c/o Mr. Larry RoAvenue Court
d
152813184 Weld County Road 13 28th
Greeley, CO 80631
Roggen, CO 80652
X City of Longmont
I � Office of Planning and Development
c/o Ms. Erode Greenberg
Civic Center Complex
Longmont, CO 80501
y o X Mr. George Johnson, Jr.
1n ? Writers' Tower, Suite 1100
{ 1660 South Albion Street
Denver, CO 80222
I'
X Longmont Fire Protection District
Xc/o Mr. Bill Emerson
9119 County Line Road 1/z bnl
Longmont, CO 80501 710(tr
V X Longmont Soil Conservation Service
/ 9595 Nelson Road
Box D
Longmont, CO 80501
SR—Specific Recommendations
NR=No Response
880;320
I
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. Box 850
Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850
(303) 353-1232
lo,
�F Fcow
eg
April 4, 1988 Weld Co. , 1-25
Kanemoto Zone Change
Mr. Rod Allison 1 Mi. S. of SH 119 Int.
Department of Planning Services on E. I-25 F.R.
Weld County
915 — 10th Street DOH File 45100
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Mr. Allison:
We have reviewed the Kanemoto Zone Change and Del Camino Center Access
Analysis. This property was previously reviewed as a sketch plan, and
comments were provided to you in our February 9, 1988, letter. We would
like to add the following to our previous comments:
1. We are in agreement with the two access points on the I-25 frontage
road, but we ask that consideration be given to the future traffic
circulation requirements in this area. This property is included
in the I-25 Mixed-Use Development Area. Due to the urban level of
development which is anticipated by this designation, access through
this development to adjacent properties, including the small residential
enclave, should be considered. Rights of way or easements could be
provided through lots in this development so that traffic could circulate
between abutting properties and, thereby, reduce the demand for direct
access to the I-25 frontage road and Weld County Road 22.
2. The traffic impacts of this development have been analyzed in the
3/15/88 Del Camino Center Access Analysis by Matt Delich, P.E. We
agree with the conclusions in this analysis regarding the "Lane/Geometric
Requirements" for the two proposed I-25 F.R. access points. We also
support moving the northern access 100 feet to the south to achieve
better separation from W.C.R. 22. It is required that both access
points meet the sight distance requirements of the State Highway Access
Code for an Access Permit to be approved.
As indicated in the access analysis, the developer desires to build
the required turn lanes at the frontage road access points when necessary,
based upon traffic generated from this site. In general, we require
that all access turn lanes be constructed as part of the initial access
construction. However, we would accept the phased construction of
access improvements on the I-25 F.R. Phase One for each access would
consist of the access construction along with a right-turn deceleration
lane. Phase Two would involve completion of all turn lanes, including
a median left-turn deceleration lane and a right-turn acceleration
lane. The completion of Phase Two improvements would be required
8191n2
C
r
ROD ALLISON
April 4, 1988 Kanemoto Zone Change
Page Two
upon the development of lots totalling 8 or more acres per access,
and should be documented by the County through the offsite road improvement
agreement.
The construction of these improvements will require the dedication
of additional right of way along the east side of I-25. Since all
widening will take place east of the existing frontage road centerline,
the necessary additional right of way must be provided according to
the Phase Two design. The design should be coordinated with this
office to ensure that adequate right of way is dedicated.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this zone change. Please contact
Wally Jacobson at 350-2168 if you need further information.
Very truly yours,
DOUGLAS RAMES
DISTRICT ENGINEER j
�'//a /l C�J✓'G—f
John K. Crier
District Planning/Environmental Manager
JKC:mbc(WJ)
cc: D. Yost
Area Foreman
File: Crier-Jacobson via Rames
APR 71988
$1113 CG. 9bii.nn .r,.dt,uIi lWr
GEORGE G. JOHNSON, JR.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WRITERS' TOWER. SUITE 1100
1660 SOUTH ALBION STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80222
ADMITTED Ih
COLORADO AND TEXAS AREA CODE 303
758-5003
March 31 , 1988
Department of Planning Services 7 F' E�1� TY L„�
Weld County pp ��� ��
915 10th Street ill !APR 1 1988
Greeley , Colorado 80631
RE : Case No . Z-445
Proposed PUD Del Camino Center laid DJ,
19af.!f.x w5ir19llar lrl,
Gentlemen :
I have been authorized on behalf of my client , the Godding
Ditch Company , to comment upon the March, 1988 PUD CHANGE OF ZONE
DEL CAMINO CENTER WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. It is the position of
the Gadding Ditch Company that since it holds a right-of-way for
a ditch across a portion of the above property which ditch has
and is being used for the transmission of agricultural irrigation
water , that it must be guaranteed that there would be no change
or interruption of flow of water ; that its right-of-way would be
maintained ; that no improvements would be constructed on or over
the right-of-way ; and that if any culvert(s) were installed , the
t ditch company would have the right to select , supervise and
determine the timing of such installation . It is also the
position of the Godding Ditch Company that it should review,
participate in and ultimately approve either the covenants and/or
architectual controls that are to insure the integrity of the
ditch, the easement for transmission of water , the maintenance of
the ditch , the prohibition of any structure on or over the said
ditch ; the installation of adequate culverts and/or structures to
carry water through the ditch accompanied by the agreement by the
developer that there will no interruption of water through the
ditch during the irrigation season . Also , the ditch company must
have a perpetual right-of-way to perform maintenance of the
ditch.
Obviously , my client , the Godding Ditch Company, is vitally
concerned that its easements , rights-of-way , historical flows of
water , etc . will be protected . As the Department of Planning
Services knows , water is the life blood of Weld County
agriculture . For nearly a century the Godding Ditch Company has
used the ditch in question for the transmission of water to farms
located to the east and northeast of the proposed
683_ ; -
Department of Planning Services
March 31 , 1988
Page Two
development . We must protect the interest of the ditch company
and the farmers relying upon it for the transmission of water . I
thank you on behalf of my client for your attention , cooperation
and sensitivity to the situation . If you have any questions ,
comments of suggestions please address them to the undersigned at
the letterhead address .
Respectfully ,
G rge' G . Johnson , Jr
GGJ/sh
cc : Francis Gregerson , President
Godding Ditch Company
88(3 729 W 9
a
\,....
Longmont Soil Conservation District
9595 Nelson Road, Box D - Longmont, Colorado 80501
April 1, 1988
Weld County Department of Planning Services
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Case Number Z-445 - Edwin S. Kanemoto
Gentlemen:
The Flume Ditch, an appendage of the Godding Ditch, runs east-west
through this area. The Longmont Soil Conservation District has
noticed that whenever urbanization occurs around an irrigation ditch,
agriculture suffers. We would like a more detailed study of the affects
of construction and the impact this PUD change will have on the irrigation
ditch. Trash and other negative impacts on the ditch make farming in the
area difficult, so please make sure that adequate steps are being taken
to protect the irrigation ditch and quality of water, both during con-
struction and into the future.
Sincerely,
f , r-`
Luther Stromquist
President
LS:rah
/pi cp
r�l`, 1 q88 •
Gehl Co. Air
/I
,Nle c4airrmIggioi.
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 880-2
C7...�4Y i.J rti,
4"A,
Pod Allison
To Planning Department pate April 8, 1988
COLORADO From Drew J,. Scheitinga, County Engineer
sublec,: Kanemoto - Change of Zone Z-4451 i<7 \
I have no objection to the change-of-zone application. However,
there are some comments regarding the application materials I would
like to make prior to the PUD Application.
There should be no access to the subdivision from Weld County
Road 22.
There should be no access from any lot onto the I-25 Frontage
Road. Also, there should an access easement identified across the
east line of Lot 14, so the residential property can be served if the
Colorado Department of Highways limits access in the future.
The plan to detain stormwater on each individual site will be
acceptable because the lots are relatively large. However, an overall
drainage plan addressing how stormwater will be collected and where it
will be discharged should be submitted.
DLS/rs:mk
xc: Planning Referral File - Kanemoto Change-of-Zone Z-445
fil APR 8 1988 �, L
•
*e!I Ltl. Phi"li l:t 41!f{tUll.\.'.:•fin
88G
:n
rChtril VIVID
To WIWeld County Planning de March 31, 1980
i ervces
COLORADO FromHealth Protection S (- 1
Subject- Case Number: Z-445 Name: Kanemoto, Edwin S.
Health Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. Waste oil, waste paints, stains, treatments, spent drug containers,
anti-freeze, and other associated liquid and solid wastes, shall be
stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects
against surface and groundwater contamination.
2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site.
3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, disposed, in a manner
that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential
nuisance conditions.
4. Fugitive dust must be confined on this site.
5. Maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the industrial
limit of 80db(A) , as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado
Revised Statues.
6. The Division requires that this facility utilize the existing
municipal sewer treatment system. Adequate water supply must be
provided to the development by the Central Weld County Water
District
153115V/1?L
lI APR 61988
DLL__
hid Co. 9lasal6u .',Duos^inn
88t32()
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE
STATE OF COLORADO 1
) ss •
COUNTY OF WELD 1
I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I• - am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze;
that the same is a weekly newspaper
printed, in whole or in part, and published
in the County of Weld, State of Colorado,
and has a general circulation therein; that
said newspaper has been published
continuously and uninterruptedly in said
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING! County of Weld for a period of more than
The Weld County Planning Corn-' fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the
mission will conduct a public .',
hearing on Tuesday, April 19. first publication of the annexed legal notice
1988, at 1:30 p.m, to review ea
or advertisement; that said newspaper has
request for (Al rhann
N,..moo fromm A A (Agricultural) to been admitted to the United States mails as
PUP C-1. C-2,.C-3, 1-1, and 1-2) second-class matter under the provisions of
uses from EdwmxKanemot0,et
al,the parcel of land is described the Act of March 9, 1679, Or ally
• as part of the w•a of the Nor amendments thereof, and that said
Section 14, T2N, R6BW of of the •
6th P.M., Weld County,Colorado,containi I newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly
less he p property
operrtyty more or acres,
The is located qualified for publishing legal notices and
approximately south of and i advertisements within the meaning of the
adjacent to Weld County Road
22: east of and adjacent to the laws of the State of Colorado.
East 1-2s Frontage Read. That the annexed legal notice or advertise-
The public hearing to be held by ment was published In the regular and
the Weld County Planning Corn-
mission for the consideration of entire issue of every number of said weekly
be conducted the abovereferenced ed in the Weld County newspaper for the period of consecu-
Commissioners'ers' request will Hearing Room, tive insertions; and that the first
First Floor, Weld County Cente
nial Center, 915 Tenth Street, publication of said notice was in the issue n
Greeley, Colorado. Comments or I said newspaperdatrtf/1"«'• A.U. 16:e1�
reestobjections related to the above i and that th last publication of said notice
request should be Weld dmlotl in
writing to the in County was in the issue of said newspaper dated
9Department of PlanningServices, G�,t,�
Greeley,C Street,ado 80631, Sore2, ma--• A.D. 19
Colorado t o prese before
the above date or presented at - In witness R'l1C[Cpf I have hereunto set
the public hearing on April 19, my hand this -....( day of .tit"
1 she. A.D. 19aoh'
Copies of the application are
available rt public inspection in A
the cepartRont of2,Planning ✓{/,/��
Services Room Cen, Weld YJ
County Centennial Center, 915 Publisher
Tenth Street,Greeley,Colorado,-
Phone - 356-4000, Extension
4400.
Ann Garrison, Chairman
Weld County Planning Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Commission of
to be published in the Johnstown Notary Public in and f0[ the County
Breeze Weld,State of Color t,,this -,.7/.--- day of
To e published one (1) time by •%711�•r" A.D. 19 .r...47
• April 8, 1988 I y7,"��� ///9 /,,e
Notary Public.
My commission expires
•
-.
883' t
� l
EDWIN S KANEMOTO, ET AL
Z-445
SURROUNDING MINERAL OWNERS
Edwin S. Kanemoto, et al
302 South Main Street
Longmont, CO 80501-6497
Mary Befus
c/o Rose Hafferber
6490 Salisbury Court
Arvada, CO 80002
8s..os,rry
EDWIN S KANEMOTO, ET AL
Z-445
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Harold and Fred Reese
855 Sunrise Highway
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Daryl E. and Donna G. Kuehn
3909 Weld County Road 20-1/2
Longmont, CO 80501
Marvin D. and Sharon K. Hopper
Verner A. and Adelyn C. Johnson
3656 Weld County Road 20-1/2
Longmont, CO 80501
Olson Land and Cattle Company
43C6 Weld County Road 22
Longmont, CO 80501
Horses Unlimited
c/o Geroge Salisburg
Slater, CO 81653
Flatiron Paving Company
P.O. Box 229
Boulder, CO 80306
Azalea Farms Ltd.
c/o Edwin C. McDowell, Jr.
4862 Kellogg Circle
Boulder, CO 80303
Rodney R. and M. Ernestine McDaniel
9762 I-25 Access Road East
Longmont, CO 80501
Frederick H. Griffin
Linda Tripp
9748 I-25 Access Road East
Lonmgont, CO 80501
Larry L. and Regina K. McBrien
9518 I-25 Access Road East
Longmont, CO 80501
Herbert M. Olander
250 River Loop No. 1
Eugene, OR 97404
69.f0320
s
James T. Jr. , and Carolyn Sue Westervelt
9762 I-25 Access Road East
Longmont, CO 80501
4/13/88 COPY OF NOTICE MAILED FIRST CLASS TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY COLORADO
P. 0. BOX 758
GAY, COLORADO 80632
JEFF LeDOUX
NELSON ENGINEERS
GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA
822 7TH STREET
GREELEY, CO 80631
88020
DEL CAMINO CENTER
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PUD CHANGE OF ZONE
MARCH, 1988
PUD CHANGE OF ZONE
FOR
DEL CAMINO CENTER
MARCH, 1988
PCD ( ::NED PNIT DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APPLICATION
Case 5:
Dept. of Planning Services App. Chid By: _Date Rec'd:
915 loch Street App. Fee: Receipt
Greeley, Colorado '0631 Record. Fee: Receipt U:
-Phone: 356-4000, Ext. 4400
'1'O BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, _except for necessary signature.
I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning
Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed
rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Veld County, Colorado: LEGAL
DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A"
(If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet)
Property Address (if available):
PRESENT ZONE Agricultural PROPOSED ZONE POD TOTAL ACREAGE72,233
OVERLAY ZONES None
SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING:
Name: ldwin S. Kanemoto, etal Home Telephone #:
Address: 203 South Main Street Bus. Telephone #:
Longmont, Colorado 80501-6497
Name: See Exhibit "B" Home Telephone it:
Address: Bus. Telephone II:
Name: Home Telephone It:
Address: Bus. Telephone 8:
Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above):
Name: Home Telephone 11:
Address: Bus. Telephone It:
Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record
in the Weld County Assessor's Office:
Name: Edwin S. Kanemoto, etal (1/2 interest)
Address: 203 South Main Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501-6497
Name: Teary Befuq c/n Rnge Hafferhpr (1/9 interest)
Address: 6590 Salisbury Court, Arvada, Cnlnradn 80009
Name:
Address:
I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals
and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to
the best of my knowledge.
_COUNTY OF WELD
STATE OF COLORADO ) et:Z.
Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to before me this /7- day of /LfC1/— , 19 £'/.
SEAL
�i_s0/%4+4/q NOTA PUBLIC C
My Ccsiin expires: f 1 /9, jpp
EXHIBIT "A"
DEL CAMINO CENTER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND IN THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14 , TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, -RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL
ME-RIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SAID TRACT -BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, SAID
POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND CONSIDERING THE
NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 TO BEAR
NORTH 90°00 ' 00" £AST, WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
BEING RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 90°00 ' 00" EAST, 1310 . 4-9 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, SOUTH 00°12 ' 30" EAST, 2658 .81 FEET TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
-SAID SECTION 14 ;
-THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14 , SOUTH 89-°55 ' 47" WEST, 401. 36 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14 , NORTH 00°04 '13" WEST, 73 .79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50°24 ' l-G" WEST, 444. 96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89-°46 ' 35" WEST, 559. 70 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14, NORTH 00°24 ' 08" WEST, 831 .11 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14 , NORTH 89°35 ' 52" EAST, 299. 00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°24 ' 08" WEST, 175 . 00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°35 ' 52" WEST, 299 . 00 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14, NORTH 00°24 ' 08" WEST, 1293.66 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 72 . 233 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND
IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER EASEMENTS AS GRANTED OR
T ESERVED BY INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD OR AS NOW EXISTING ON SAID
TRACT OF LAND.
EXHIBIT "B"
SURFAC-E -OWNERS OF DEL CAMINO CENTER
1. Edwin S. Kanemoto
Title Realty
203 South Main Street
Longmont, Colorado -80501-6497
( 303 ) 772-2222
2. Frank S . Bigelow
Specialty Products
204 South Bowen Street
Longmont, Colorado 80301
(303 ) 772-2103
3 . James S. Cobb
Cornerstone Homes , Inc.
P. D. Box 1101
Longmont, Colorado 20501
( 303 ) 772-2198
4 . Kenneth Kanemoto
Title Realty
203 South Main Street
Longmont, Colorado 80501-6497
(303 ) 772-2222
5. David G. Neenan
Neenan & Company
P. D. Box 2127
Fort Collins, Colorado B0522
(303 ) 825-6113
Planned Unit Development Change of Zone
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
SURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject Property Del Camino Center - Tart of the -West Half, Section 14-2-68
STATE OF COLORADO )
1 ) ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,
addresses and the corresponding Parcel identification Number assigned by the
Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within
five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the applii-tion. This list
was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership
update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such
records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list
compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been
assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission -date.
2/7 //7
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before .me this 7/ —�
day 19�� by y2u� 7c ,
WITNESS mly hand and official seal. JJ
My Commission expires: (2/0/0//3 /%1/l'
��� 444)
Note ry Public J
Planned Unit Development Change of Zone
NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET
Please print or type
NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
STATE AND ZIP CODE -IDENTIFICATION 1/
1. Reese, Harald • 855 Sunrise Hwy 131310000041
and Fred__ Lynbrook, N.Y. 11563 131315000094, 131315000095
2. Kuehn, Daryl E. 3909 WCR 20 1/2
and Donna G. Longmont, CO. 80501 131315009022
3. Hopper, Marvin D. 3656 WCR 20 1/2
and Sharon K. and Longmont, CO.. 80501 131315000073
Johnson, Verner A.
and Adelyn C.
4: Olson land and 4306 WCR 22 131311000003
Cattle Co. Longmont, Colorado 80501 131314000004
5. Horses Unlimited
c/a George Salisburg Slater, CO. 81653 131311000022
6. Flatiron Paving Co. 1'. 0. Box 229
Boulder, CO. 80305 131311000023
7. Azalea Farms Limited 4862 Kellogg -Circle
c/o -Edwin C. McDowell, Jr. Boulder, CO. 80303 131311000050
8. McDaniel, Rodney R. 9/b2 1-2S Access Road East
and M. Ernestine Longmont, CO. 80501 131314000006
9. Griffin, Frederick H. 9748 I-25 Access Road East
and Linda Tripp Longmont, CO.. 80501 131314000007
10. McBri-en, Larry L. 9518 I-25 Access Road East
and Regina K. Longmont, _CO. 80501 131314000008
11. Olander, -Herbert M. 250 -River Loop No. 1
Eugene, OR. 97404 131314000054
12. Westervelt, James T. Jr. 9762 I-25 -Access Road East
4
and Carolyn Sue Longmont, CO. 80501 131314000046
Planned Unit Development Change of Zone
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE
Application No.
Subject Property Del Camino Center - Part of the West Half, Northwest Quarter,
Section 14-2-68. Weld County. Colorado
STATE _OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD
THE UNDERSIGNED, hPing first duly -sworn, states that to the best of his
or het knowledge the attached list is a true an-d accurate list of the names
an-d addresses of all minral owners and lesses of mineral -owners on or under
the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names
appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, _or
from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney.
214 AC9 4'
The foregoing instrument was subscrib
ped and sworn to -before me this /PS-
day
(day _of 221,,i-eL , 19%4
WITNESS -my hand and official seal.
Hy Commission expires: (12,1" D74 /9/f
iyNo Public
OWNERS AND/OR LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS
1 . Edwin S. Kanemoto, etal ( 1/2 interest)
203 South Main Street
Longmont, Colorado 80501-6497
2. Mary Befus ( 1/2 interest )
c/o Rose Hafferber
6490 Salisbury Court
Arvada, Colorado 80002
ATTACHMENT TO P.U.D. CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION
DEL CAMINO CENTER
In Section 14, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.
Weld County, Colorado
March, 1988
Prepared By:
Nelson Engineers
520 Greeley National Plaza
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Proposed Planned Unit Development Plan
The proposed Del Camino Center development will be a high
quality industrial park providing a maximum of 20 lots. The
72.233 acre site is located on the Interstate 25 east frontage
road and one mile south of State Highway 119 along Weld County
Road 22. The industrial park is organized into 20 large lot
sites with orderly traffic circulation. The park will allow uses
in the C-1, C-2, C-3, I-1, and I-2 districts as defined in the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance. As required in the ordinance, if
any outdoor storage of vehicles, equipment or materials, or if
outdoor operations occur in the park, the uses will be screened
with a -fence and/or vegetation to reduce the visual impact on the
surrounding uses and areas. Materials used for screening will be
established and submitted with the "IUD -Final Plan application.
It is the developers concept of the park for the buildings
to be standard masonry structures, with possible exceptions of
quality metal structures. The buildings are intended to be
neutral or earthtone in color, a maximum of 35 feet in height,
and with a 12: 1 roof pitch. A 25 foot setback will be required
along the perimeter property line and along the internal roadway
right-of-way line. An offset of 10 feet or 1 foot for every 2
feet of building height will be -enforced within the park. The
owners plan to enforce the above mentioned site development
requirements and other development standards by convenants and
architectual controls to be submitted at the TUD Final Plan stage.
The proposed Del Camino Center will have an average density
of 3. 6 acres/lot. The proposed development is consistent with
the intent of the conceptual use of the property as shown in the
1986 Weld County Comprehensive Plan for the Interstate 25 mixed-
use development and activity center area. The Comprehensive
Plan's conceptual use for this property is industrial. The
Comprehensive Plan states "It is the County' s intent to accom-
modate industrial development proposals in accordance within the
urban growth boundary and Interstate 25 mixed-use development and
activity center goals and policies. "
Open space will be provided and accomplished by the individual
lot owners or renters. The open space and landscaping is intended
to compliment the natural environment. A minimum of 15% of the
lot area will be provided for open space/l-andscaping. Lots
adjacent to public rights-of-way or private lands will provide a
minimum 20 foot wide open space/landscape area as shown on the
PUD District Plat. In addition, the property owners to the south-
west of the development, who were once the owners of the Del
C-amino Center property, have agreed to provide a 50. foot wide ( ± )
landscape buffer area along their property line, as shown on the
PUD District Plat. Open space/landscape areas will consist of
grass, shrubs, trees, plants, flowers, decorative gravel, or
woodchips. A detailed landscaping plan will be submitted at a
later stage of the PUD process. Again, the owners plan to
-enforce the open space/landscape requirements by the convenants
of the industrial park.
Public Water and Sewer - Domestic water service will be pro-
vided by Central Weld County Water District. The property is
within its service area. The existing waterlines are not
adequate to serve the needs of the project, but improvements are
underway to provide adequately sized lines to serve the water
needs of the industrial park. Central Weld County Water District
has indicated a willingness to serve the Del Camino Center. See
Exhibit "C" .
Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the St. Vrain
Sanitation District. The proposed PUD site lays within the
District ' s boundary and was incorporated into the design of the
District's facilities. The St. Vrain Sanitation District has
indicated a willingness to serve the Del Camino Center. See
Exhibit "D" .
Storm Water Management Drainage Plan - The storm water
management plan for the Del Camino Center will consist of a
system of detention ponds on the proposed lots sized in accordance
with Weld County requirements to -detain runoff flows in excess of
the historic rate. Where possible, the detention ponds will be
integrated into open space areas. All existing and future storm
runoff will be routed through these detention ponds and discharged
at the historic rate into the existing historic drainage pattern.
A storm - water drainage report and plan that meets the requirements
of Weld County will be submitted at the PUD Final Flan stage.
Roadway and Utility System - The proposed vehicular system
will consist of private local roadways throughout the industrial
development. The local roadways will be paved, 40 feet wide, and
with a 60 foot wide right-of-way. The internal roadway widths and
water utility design meet or will meet the requirements of the
Longmont Fire Protection District and the Uniform Fire Code.
Access will be provided from the Interstate 25 east frontage road.
-Access to the lots will be from the private local roadway system.
If necessary, the Interstate 25 east frontage road intersections
with the private roadways will be upgraded in accordance with the
Colorado Department of -Highway regulations. -A traffic analysis
was performed by Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , to determine the
impact on the Interstate 25 east frontage road intersection by
the development' s two points of access. A copy of that report
has been fowarded to the Colorado State Highway _Department and
the Weld _County Planning Department. An offsite road improvement
agreement that is consistent with the traffic analysis will be
submitted at the PUD -Final Plan stage.
Only off-street parking will be permitted within the BUDS
Each individual lot will provide parking for its facility. The
number of off-street parking spaces provided will meet or exceed
the requirements of the Weld County zoning ordinances.
The actual design and specifications of the pavement for the
internal roadways will be determined after an extensive soil study
and tests of the specific materials have been accomplished at the
PUD Final P1-an stage.
Soils - This -application is being accompanied by guideline
excerpts from the published "Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado,
Southern Part" developed by the United States Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservati-on Service (SCS) . The information
from that report indicates that there may be some limitations on
development by the soils in the area. The SCS has classi₹ie-d the
soils from slight to moderate difficulties for dwelling and road
construction for one or more reasons. The soils on the site are
fine sandy loam and have a low shrink/swell potential. As stated
above, the SCS information is a -guide. any actual construction
of dwellings or roads must be preceded by extensive soil surveys
and tests of the specific material which will result in develop-
ment of exacting specifications for foundation and roadway designs.
The Applicant, on the advice of his professional -engineer, believes
that he tan develop a sound, feasible project using these soils.
Should detailed testing reveal that such construction is
positively infeasible, which is highly unlikely, the project
plans would be altered accordingly.
Generally, the soils are predicted to be adequate, with
proper precautions and design. The soil conditions in the area
east of Longmont are generally acceptable for construction as
evidenced by existing dwellings and other structures in the area.
Mineral Resources - Empire Laboratories has performed a
soils investigation to determine the availibility of economically
removing mineral resources under the subject property. A copy of
hat analysis and report when completed will be sent to the Colorado
Geological Survey and the Weld County Planning Department for
review.
-Hazard Areas - There are no apparent hazards or restrictions
that would conflict with this change of zone application. The
site is well above the St. Vrain Creek floodplain hazard area.
There are no geological hazards evident on maps provided by Weld
County. The airport overlay district -does not affect this site.
Surrounding Land Uses - The immediate Del Camino Center
environs consist of existing commercial/industrial development
adjacent to the proposed site along with agricultural lands. The
entire area is _rapidly growing and changing. Properties north
and northwest are presently zoned C-3. The Del Camino area,
approximately one mile north, has added numerous developments to
its area in the past few years. The limited number of -available
industrial sites in the area demonstrate a need for this type of
development. The Del Camino Center development can -meet the
continued growth needs of the area.
Existing Unique features - As shown on the PUD -District
Plat, an existing Panhandle Eastern gas line and a Wyco gas lire
run through the proposed site. The developer has been in contact
with Wyco Gas Line, and it is the intent of the developer to
relocate that gas line adjacent to the -Panhandle Eastern gas line
easement as shown on the PUD District Plat. It is the intent of
the developer to comply with the easement or right-of-way restric-
tions and requirements of the gas companies. The proposed
relocated gas line has been incorporated into the design of the
PUD and no conflict is anticipated.
The Flume Ditch, an appendage of the Godding Ditch, runs
east-west through the north half of the proposed Del Camino
Center, as shown on the -PUD District Plat. It is the intent of
the -developer to cross the ditch with a -roadway and necessary
local service utilities. The improvements will not restrict the
Gadding Ditch Company's right to maintain the ditch or related
structures, nor will the improvements disturb the water flow
through the -ditch.
There are no unique natural features existing on the pro-
posed -site, such as wildlife areas or unique vegetative cover.
EXHIBIT "C"
OWe
CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
February 10, 1988
Jeff Ledoux
Nelson Engineering
822 7th St. , Suite 520
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Water Service to Frank S. Gigelow, James S. Cobb, David G. Neenan,
Edwin S. Kanemoto and Kenneth Kanemoto Property
Dear Mr. Ledoux:
This letter is in response to your request for water service
to serve the following described property:
SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Water service can be made available to the above
described property provided all requirements of the District
are satisfied, including easements where required for District
facilities .
Central Weld County Wa#er Di-strict requires that contracts
be consumated within one ( 1 ) year from the date of this
letter . or this letter shall become null and void unless
extended in writing by the District .
Very truly yours ,
CENTRAL MELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
hn Zac�€ 17
Manager
JZ/ca
2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • (303) 352.1284 • John W. Zadel, General Manager
EXHIBIT "C"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND IN THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SAID TRACT BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, SAID
POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND CONSIDERING THE
NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 TO BEAR
NORTH 90°00' 00" EAST, WITH ALL OTHER BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
BEING RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE NORTH 90°00 ' 00" EAST, 1310.49 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, SOUTH 00°12' 30" EAST, 2658 .81 FEET TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14, SOUTH 89°55' 47" WEST, 401.36 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14, NORTH 00°04' 13" WEST, 13.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50°24 '16" WEST, 444.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°46 '35" WEST, 559.70 -FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST -LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14, NORTH 00°24 ' 08" WEST, 831.17 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14, NORTH 8-9°35 ' 52" EAST, 299.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°211'-08" WEST, 175.00 BEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°33 '32" WEST, 299.00 -FEET;
THENCE ALONG SHE WEST SINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14, NORTH 00°24 ' 08' WEST, 1293.6E FEET TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 72. 233 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND
IS SUBJECT SO ANY RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR OTHER EASEMENTS AS GRANTED OR
RESERVED BY INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD OR AS NOW EXISTING ON SAID
TRACT OF LAND.
EXHIBIT "D"
RECEIVE:. , 2 -' :2: 3
cSf. q¢ain cSanitation (Thistticf
(cSaint cSan j
February 19, 1988 600 9(tmBa2& cStvcct
cunt S
1303) 776-9570 llonymont, CO 80501
Mr. Vern Nelson
Nelson Engineers
Greeley National Plaza
822 Seventh Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Re: Saint Vrain Sanitation District - Commitment to Serve
Dear Vern:
This letter is in reference to the following-described real property:
Del Camino Center located in the W-1/2 of the NW-1/4, Section
14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal
Meridian.
Saint Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SFE (single family equivalent)
taps, of which 47.7 -have been purchased, resulting in 1804.3 available
for purchase. These taps are available to you and other eligible
landowners on a first-come, first-served basis, with a single exception.
Prior to the adoption of its present policy, the District committed
itself to reserve 269 SFE taps for a period of time. These commitments
expire June 30 and December 31, 1988; they will then be converted to this
same first-come, first-served basis. This results in 1535.3 SFE taps
presently available.
As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase
the size of Fts treatment plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional
taps will also be made available on a first-come, first-served basis.
The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply
of taps on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to the following:
a. Installation of on-site collection system -and connection to the
District's system by the applicant;
b. execution of a Service Agreement;
c. Purchase and payment of the required number of taps ; and
d. Compliance with the District's Rules and Regulations.
EXHIBIT "D"
Mr. Vern Nelson
Nelson Engineers
February 19, 1988
Should you wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be
pre-purchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be
assessed upon completion of construction or twelve months, whichever comes
first.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
SAINT VRAIN SAN TATI0N DISTRICT
By /O
SAINTINC2 L. D. Lawson, P.E.
cc: Nelson Engineers
Mr. Edward Kanamoto
Title Executive Realty
SOIL SURVEY
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
United State Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
In Cooperatrion With
Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station
t*
rt 11,'') 4, ,
rj�]{°�yss-r/_ f1 --- ---- / y. 3
.,l / I S i.ZT k A. p
f
5 'hr
65 x "RAIN ri r 1
3 >-kr t {y d
� }5 C'NP CE_'._ '
.J1'.
7J 999333 l. .� y_ y'
10 ' 10 . - *3_ usr 3 't 1 2]
\ ._ t,/ 3 wale, `;i.
Lam' 3'^a ;.
.pL « -
t.
\..• 10 X l 27 , , r74
a '76
el* '� s yt4 li
a
J z
x 7
U EPA 43� +d - e ! eF t
•T.'
i c� 4 l z7 cALEt -
10 38
i ac 76 77 /..".5 //O 13 .. 73
1 a8 N ti7
10 52 # tst
1
A` ,. pp z 48
i 76
vo 2] ,b 1 li
�.�. 4. Pie' , ( 1 , ` • , 47 ai. t, dL
10 a � to I 47 13 � , 76 73
1 rtt. x Aoa
]2 7 in� � li GGGG���Xii'� � \ a48 76 q]77 r 1 ]] 38 - ri '44* - a1 _ f
Q" P 5 , �♦ aO .rLfita !'-',Sh' ♦� ' :_
�: 38 7J ® 77- 14� 1xS ' _8 .�' . 38 - 13--
44 72
1' r „ 76 s $ 1,♦
.4„x76 - r 33 w+ u
?� it
3
.. a7 ' \
3J 40 - 76 y % r�.
a7
26 i
38 yi
� ' t. 4J 31//!1 2fl 4� i,, "I. }
73
76 '1w« t t:, �5 : 57 _ 4 YTi .Y`�iL ; ♦> •.
Z . 38 ,.p.� '.` fi �Ar ' 0
38 r 57 ♦''.X46 // 1 {/�,(�'it 6 6�., ..I 17- :> y✓
22 v
1.
f-„_3,/-5 3
'S 65 48 d \\ 47 47 37:. i'nJ 73 24 rz f
,+r•E'••..!Gf."" 1 J.i . iii?‘" '1r f! :id(
26
SOIL SURVEY
shale is about 18 inches. Permeability is moderate. Availa- plication of barnyard manure and commercial fertilizer.
ble water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is Keeping tillage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue
10 to 20 inches. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and are important.
the erosion hazard is moderate. In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat,
This unit is used as rangeland and wildlife habitat. The barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to
potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali sacaton, winter wheat and is summer fallowed in alternate years
western wheatgrass, and blue grams. Buffalograss, to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is
sideoats grama, needleandthread, little bluestem, sedge, too low for beneficial use of fertilizer.
winterfat, and fourwing saltbush are also present. Poten- Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til-
tial production ranges from 800 pounds per acre in lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion.
favorable years to 500 pounds in unfavorable years. As The potential native vegetation on this range site is
range condition deteriorates, the mid grasses decrease dominated by_sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue
and forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an- grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grams,
nuals invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential
Management of vegetation on this unit should be based production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora-
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range
tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass,
Western wheatgrass, blue grams, alkali sacaton, sideoats and switchgrass decrease and blue grams, sand dropseed,
grams, little bluestem, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade
wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected the site as range condition becomes poorer.
should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be on taking half and leaving half of the totalannual produc-
drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition.
spring has proven most successful. Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass,
Rangeland wildlife, such as. antelope, cottontail, and switchgrass, sideoats
_coyote, are best suited to this unit. Because forage wheatgrassblue gram;are suitable for pubescent ding. The and crested
lected
production is typically low,grazing management is needed should t theme asonal requirements of livestocks eIt can
if livestock-and-wildlife share the-range. Livestock water- be seeded into a dean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be
ing facilities also-are utilized by various wildlife species. drilled into a firm -prepared seedbed. Seeding early in
The nearby cropland-makes areas-of this unit valuable as spring has proven most successful.
escape cover for apenland wildlife, especially pheasants. Windbreak and environmental plantings are generally
Capability subclass VIe irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Shaly not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to
Plains range site. determine if plantings are feasible.
37—Nelson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
This is a moderately deep, well drained soil on plains at cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked
elevations of 4,800 to 5,050 feet. It formed in residuum pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can
from soft sandstone. Included in-mapping are small areas be developed by establishing areas for nesting and escape
of soils that have sandstone at a depth of-more than 40 cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen-
inches.
tial and should-be included in plans for habitat develop-
Typically the surface layer is light brownish ray fme t
, especially in areas sandy loam about 9 inches thick The underlying gmate al land wildlife, for example of he pronghorn antelo culture Range-
e, can be
is light olive brown fine sandy loam. Soft sandstone is at attracted by developing livestock watering pfacilities,
a depth of about 30 inches.
managing
Permeability is moderately rapid. Available waterTe un erlying stockgrazing, and reseedin where needed.
capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to of this soil. Nei her dseptic stone is
absorption fields the most limiting feature nor
40 inches. Surface runoff is slow to medium, and the ero- sewage lagoons operate properly. Site preparation for
sion hazard is low. dwellings is more costly. Environmental and beautifica-
This soil is suited to most of the irrigated crops com- tion plantings of trees and shrubs may be difficult to
monly grown in the area, but it is somewhat restricted establish. This soil, however, does have.good potential for
because it is only moderately -deep. A suitable cropping such recreational development as camp and picnic areas
system is corn, corn for silage, barley, 3 to 4 years of al- and playgrounds. Capability subclass Ills irrigated, IVe
falfa, and wheat. This soil is also well suited to irrigated nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site.
pasture.
38—N son fine sandy cent sloes.
Row crops can be irrigated -by furrows or sprinklers. This el is a moderately deep,lwell drained soil ron plains at
Flooding from contour ditches and sprinkling are suitable elevations of 4,800 to 5,050 feet. It formed in residuum
in irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Small heads derived from soft sandstone. Included in mapping are
of water and short runs help to reduce erosion. Produc- small areas of soils that have sandstone at a depth of
tion can be maintained with frequent irrigations and ap- more than 40 inches.
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 27
Typically the surface layer is light brownish gray fine establish. This soil, however, does have good potential for
sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The underlying material such recreational development as camp and picnic areas
is light olive brown fine sandy loam. Soft sandstone is at and playgrounds. Capability subclass IVe irrigated, Vie
a depth of about 28 inches. nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site.
Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water 39—Nunn loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep,
capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,550 to 5,000
40 inches. Surface runoff is medium to rapid, and the ero- feet. It formed in mixed alluvium. Included in mapping
sion hazard is moderate. are small, long and narrow areas of sand and This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive occa-
cropping g is hazardous. because of erosion. The cropping deposits and small areas af soil elet are subject toalso i eluded.
flooding. Some small leveled areas are in-
system should be limited to such close grown crops as al- eluded.
falfa, wheat, and barley. This soil is also suited to ir- Typically the surface layer of this Nunn soil is grayish
rigated years of alfalfa pasture. f suitable
owed topping system is 3 to 4 brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is light
and alfalfa seeded with a nurse years of corn and small brownish gray clay loam about 12 inches thick. The upper
grain crop.
Close grown crops can be irrigated from closely spaced part of the substratum is light brownish gray clay loam.
The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is brown sandy
contour ditches or sprinklers. Contour furrows or sprin-
klers should be used for new crops. Applications of loam.
nitrogen and phosphorus help in maintaining good produc- Permeability is moderately slow. Available water
tion. capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches
The potential native vegetation on this range site is or more. Surfacesunoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is
dominated by sand bluestem, sand reed low.
grass, and blue This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grams is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ-
and western wheatgrass are also prominent. _Potential •
ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa,_small grain, potatoes,
production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora-
ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3
to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage,
condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass,
and switch
u s ar beets, small
grass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, g grain, or beans. Few conservation prac-
tires are needed to maintain top yields.
and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade
All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
the site as range condition becomes poorer.
ligation is the most common. Barnyard manure and com-
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and
grass, sideoats shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switch
grama, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested suited to -this soil. Cultivation to control competing
grass selected vegetation should be continued for as many years as
wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The
Possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can
be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can-be have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern
drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and
spring has proven most successful. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush, lilac,
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally Siberian peashrub, and American plum.
not suited. Onsite investigation is needed to determine if Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
plantings are feasible. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The pheasant and-mourning dove. Many nongame species can
cropland areas provide wildlife habitat for ring-necked be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen-
be attracted-by establishing areas for nesting and escape tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop-
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- ment, especially in areas of intensive-agriculture.
tial and-should be included in plans for habitat develop- This soil has fair to poor potential for urban develop-
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- ment. It has moderate to high shrink swell, low strength,
land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be and moderately slow permeability. These features create
attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, problems in dwelling and road construction. Those areas
managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed. that have loam or sandy loam in the lower part of the
The_underlying sandstone is the most limiting feature substratum are suitable for septic tank absorption fields
of this soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor and foundations. Someareas areadjacent to streams and
sewage lagoons operate properly. Site preparation for are subject to occasional flooding. This soil has fair poten-
dwellings is more costly. Environmental and beautifica- tial for such recreational development as ramp and picnic
tion plantings of trees and shrubs may be difficult to areas and playgrounds. Capability class I irrigated.
48 SOIL SURVEY
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally
on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in
tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul-
Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of
grama, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation
wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected may be necessary at the time of planting and during the
should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can dry periods. Trees that are best suited and have good
be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar,
drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in Ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackber-
spring has proven most successful. ry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well Siberian peashrub.
suited to this soil. Blowing sand and low available water Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil.
capacity are the principal hazards in establishing trees Ring-necked pheasant, mourning dove, and many non-
and shrubs. This soil is so loose that trees should be game species can be attracted by establishing areas for
planted in shallow furrows and vegetation maintained nesting and escape cover. For pheasants, undisturbed
nesting cover is essential and should be included in plans
between the rows. Supplemental irrigation may be needed
for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive
to insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have
good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern agriculture.
redcedar, ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian development. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. The
peas}Irub, only limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the sub-
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Ran- stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con-
geland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can tamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass Its
be attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, lmgated'
managing livestock-grazing,and reseeding where needed. 76—Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a
This soil has good potential for urban and recreational deep, well drained soil on plains and high terraces at
elevations of 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It_formed in eolian and
development. Once established, the lawns, shrubs, and
trees grow well. The primary limiting soil feature is the alluvial deposits. Included in mapping are some leveled
areas. Also included are small areas oT soils that have a
rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a
hazard of ground water contamination from sewage loamy substratum and areas of soils that are noncalcare-
lagoons. In places recreational development is limited by ous to a depth of 60 inches.
Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish
the susceptibility to soil blowing. Capability subclass VIe brown sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is
irrigated, VIe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. brown fine sandy loam about 18 inches thick. The sub-
75—Vona sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a stratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam.
deep, well drained soil on high terraces at elevations of Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water
4,650 to 4,950 feet. It formed in alluvial deposits. Included capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60
in mapping are some leveled areas and small areas of inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion
soils that have a loamy substratum. hazard is low.
Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com-
brown sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets,
brown fine sandy loam about 20 inches thick. The sub- beans, alfalfa, small grain, and onions. An example of a
stratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam. suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa fol-
Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water lowed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, or
capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing pipelines
inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion are needed for proper water applications.
hazard is low. All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir-
This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It rigation is the most_common. Barnyard manure and com-
is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields.
ing corn, sugar beets, beans,alfalfa (fig. 7), small grain, Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally
potatoes, and onions. An example of a suitable cropping suited to this-soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in
system is2 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul-
silage, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. The rapidly tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of
permeable substratum slightly restricts some crops. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation
All methods-of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- may be necessary at the time of planting and during dry
rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation manage- periods. Trees that arebest suited and have good survival
ment is essential. Barnyard manure and commercial fertil- are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa
izer are needed for top yields. pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 49
shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- and switchgrass decrease and blue grams, sand dropseed,
an peashrub. and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade
Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer.
cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc-
be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape tion. Seeding is desirable if range is in poor condition.
cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats
tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- grams, blue grama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested
ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. The grass selected
land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be should meet the seasonal requirements of livestock. It can
attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be
managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. drilled into a firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in
This soil has good potential for urban and recreational spring has proven most successful.
development. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. The Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are
only limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the sub- suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in
stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con- establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by ail-
tamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass IIe tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of
irrigated; IVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains range site. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation
77—Vona sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. This is a may be needed at the time of planting and during dry
deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,600 to periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival
5,200 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar,ponderosa
mapping are small areas of soils that have a loamy sub- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The
stratum and areas of soils that are noncalcareous to a shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac and Siberi-
depth of 60 inches. an peashrub.
Typically the surface layer of this Vona soil is grayish Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The
brown sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked
brown fine sandy loam about 15 inches thick. The sub- pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can
stratum to a depth of 60 inches is sandy loam. be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape
Permeability is moderately rapid. Available water cover. For pheasants, undisturbedtesting cover is essen-
capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop-
inches or more. Surface runoff is medium,and the erosion ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range-
hazard is low. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be
In irrigated areas this soil is suited to the crops-00111- attracted by developing livestock watering facilities,
monly grown in-the area. Perennial grasses and alfalfa or managing livestock grazing,and reseeding where needed.
close grown crops should be grown at least 50 percent of This soil has good potential for urban and recreational
the time. Contour ditches and corrugations can be used in development. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. The
irrigating close grown crops and pasture. Furrows, con- only limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the sub-
tour furrows, and cross slope_furrows are suitable for row stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con-
crops. Sprinkler irrigation is also desirable. Keeping til- tamination from sewage lagoons. Capability subclass IIIe
lage to a minimum and utilizing crop residue help to con- irrigated, VTe nonirrigated; Sandyflains range site.
trol erosion. Maintaining fertility is important. Crops 78—Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent-slopes. This is a deep,
respond to applications ofphosphorus and nitrogen. well drained soil on smooth plains at-elevations of 4,850 to
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, 5,000 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in
barley, and sorghum. Most'of the acreage is planted to mapping are small areas of soils that have a subsoil of
winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels loam and light clay loam. Also included are some leveled
per acre. The soil is summer followed in alternate years areas.
to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Typically-the surface layer of this Weld soil is brown
too low to make beneficial use of fertilizer. loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown and pale
Mulch farming, striperopping,and minimum tillage are brown heavy clay loam and light clay about 20 inches
needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Terrac- thick. The substratum to-a depth of 60 inches is silt loam.
ing also may be needed to control water erosion. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is high.
The potential native vegetation on this range site is The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface
dominated by sand bluestem, and reedgrass, and blue runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low.
grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It
and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area includ-
production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes,
ble years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3
condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem,sand reedgrass, to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage,
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 101
TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued
Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads
map symbol excavations without with commercial and streets
basements basements buildings ___
19 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Colombo floods. floods. floods. floods. floods.
20 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Colombo low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength,
frost action.
21, 22 Severe: Moderate: Slight Moderate: Severe:
Dacono cutbanks cave. low strength, - low strength, shrink-swell,
shrink-swell. shrink-swell. low strength.
23, 24 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Fort Collins low strength. low strength, low strength. low strength.
shrink-swell.
25, 26 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Haverson floods. floods. floods. floods. floods.
27, 28 Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Heldt too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell,
low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength.
29, 30 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Julesburg low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength,
frost action.
31 , 32 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Kim low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength.
33, 34 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Kim low strength. low strength. low strength, low strength.
slope.
35':
Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Loup wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness.
cutbanks cave. floods. floods. floods.
Boel Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness,
floods, floods. floods. floods. floods.
cutbanks cave.
36•:
Midway Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, slope, shrink-swell,
low strength. low strength. shrink-swell, low strength.
low strength.
Shingle Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock.
slope.
37— Severe: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate:
Nelson depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock,
low strength. low strength. low strength.
• 38 Severe: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: Moderate:
Nelson depth to rock. depth to rock, depth to rock. slope, depth to rock,
low strength. depth to rock, low strength.
low strength.
39, 40, 41 , 42,
43 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Severe:
Nunn too clayey. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell,
low strength. low strength. low strength. low strength.
See footnote at end of table.
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 103
TABLE 6.--BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued
Soil name and Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small , Local roads
map symbol excavations without with commercial and streets
basements basements buildings
66, 67 Moderate: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Ulm too clayey. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. low strength,
shrink-swell.
68" Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Ustic small stones, slope, slope, slope. slope.
Torriorthents cutbanks cave.
69 Severe: Slight Slight Slight Slight.
Valent cutbanks cave.
70 Severe: Slight Slight Moderate: Slight.
Valent cutbanks cave, slope.
71*:
Valent Severe: Slight Slight Moderate: Slight.
cutbanks cave. slope.
Loup Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness, wetness.
cutbanks cave. floods, floods. floods.
72 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate:
Vona
low strength.
73, 74 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate:
Vona - slope. low strength.
75, 76 Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate:
Vona
low strength.
77 Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate:
Vona slope. low strength.
78, 79 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Weld low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength,
shrink-swell. shrink-swell, shrink-swell, shrink-swell,
frost action.
80 Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
Weld low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength,
shrink-swell. shrink-swell. slope, shrink-swell,
shrink-swell, frost action.
81*, 82*:
Wiley Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength,
shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell. shrink-swell.
Colby Slight Slight Slight Slight Moderate:
low strength.
83*:
Wiley Slight Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate:
low strength, low strength, low strength, low strength,
shrink-swell. shrink-swell. slope, shrink-swell.
shrink-swell.
Colby Slight Slight Slight Moderate: Moderate:
slope. low strength.
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit.
126 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 12.--ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued
Classification Frag- Percentage passing
Soil name and Depth USDA texture
map symbol ments sieve number-- Liquid Plas—
Unified AASHTO > 3
In limit ticity
inches 4 10 40
Pct 200 index
36*: — Pct
Shingle 0-6 Loam CL-ML A-4 0-5 75-100 75-100 70-95 55-75 25-35 5-10
6-18 Clay loam, loam CL 75-10075-100 65-100 50-
18 Unweathered --- A-6_ 0 - 30-40- 10-20
-
--- --- ___
bedrock. --- --- ---
37, 38 0-9 Fine sandy loam ML, SM
Nelson A-4 0-5 75-100 75-100 70-90 45-60 --- NP
9-30 Fine sandy loam, SM, ML A-4, A-2 0 75-100 75-100 60-85 30-55 --- NP .
sandy loam.
30 Weathered --- ---
--- --- ___ ___
--- --- -__bedrock.
39, 40 0-9 Loam CL, SC A-6 0-5 95-100 80- 70-95 45-75 25-40 10-20
Nunn 9-29 Clay loam, clay CL, CH A-6, A-7 29-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, 8
0-5 95-100 10-100 85-95 25-75 35-60 20-35
AA4, 0-5 80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20
sandy loam. CL-ML,
A-6,
SM-SC, A-2
SC
41, 42 0-9 Clay loam CL, SC A-
Nunn - 9-29 Clay loam, clay ,' CH A-6, A-7 0-5 95-100 90-100 85-95 65-75 35-60 20-35
29-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, A-4, 0-5 80-100 80-100
sandy loam. CL-ML, A-6, 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20
SM-SC, A-2
SC
43 0-9 Loamy sand SM
Nunn 9-30 Clay loam, clay CL, CH A-6 A- 0-5 95-100 80-95 85-95 20-30 --- NP
, 7 0-5 95-100 90-100 85-95 65-75 35-60 25-20
30-60 Clay loam, loam, CL, A-4
0-5 80-100 80-100 60-90 25-75 15-40 5-20
sandy loam. CL-ML, A-6,
. SM-SC, . A-2
SC
44, 45 0-10 Loamy sand SM A-2 0 95-100 90-100 60-90 15-25 NP
Olney 10-20 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 ---
20-25 Sandy loam, SC, A-4 A-6 95-100 95-100 80-100 40-55 20-40 15-
sandy clay SM-SC, 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-55 20-35 5-15
5
loam, fine CL,
sandy loam. CL-ML
25-60 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2 0 95-100 95-100 70-95 20-35 --- NP
loamy fine
sand.
46, 47, 48 0-10 Fine sandy loam SM A_
Olney 10-20 Sandy clay loam SC, CL A-6 0 95-100 90-100 75-95 95-100 90-100 80-10 0 40-55 2 20-35 20-35 10-40 10-5
' 20-25 Sandy loam, SC, 5-A-4, A-6 0 95-100 95-100 75-95 35-55 20-35 5-115
5
sandy clay SM-SC,
loam, fine CL,
sandy,loam. CL-ML
25-60 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2 0 95-100 95-100 70-95 20-35 --- NP
loamy fine
• sand.
49 0-22 Sand SM A-2 0
Osgood 22-34 Sandy loam SM 100 100 65-80 15-30 --- NP
A-2, A-4 0 100 100 60-80 30-40 NP
1
34-60 Loamy sand, sand SM A-2 0 100 95-100 50-75 10-25 --- NP
50, 51 , 52, 53 0-12 Sandy loam SM A-2 0-1 95-100 75-100 50-
Otero - 12-60 Sandy loam, fine SM 80 20-35 --- NP
A-2, A-1 0-1 90-100 50-100 40-80 20-35 --- NP
sandy loam,
gravelly sandy
loam.
54, 55 0-20 Loam ML A-4
Paoli 20-25 Fine sandy loam, SM A_4 0 95-100 90-100 75-95 55-75 25-35 . NP-5
0 80-100 80-100 60-85 35-50NP
sandy-loam.
---25-60 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2, A-4 0 75-100 75-100 55-85 30-50
sandy loam. --- NP
See footnote at end of table.
128
SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 12._-ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS--Continued
Soil name and Depth USDA texture Classification Frag- Percentage -g passing
Plas-
map symbol - Unified AASHTO m>n 3s si— ei— ve number-- L limit ticity inches 4 limit ticity
Pct 10 r u_--z00 _index
72, 73, 74 0-6 Loamy sand Pct -
Vona 6-28 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2 0 100 90-100 60-90 30-40
sandy loam. A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100 60-90 --- NP
28-60 Sandy loam, SM 30-45 --
- NP
loamy sand. A-215 0 100 90-100 50-85 75-30
--- NP
"5, 76, 77 0-6 Sandy loam SM Vona 6-28 Fine sandy loam, SM A-2, A-4 0 100 90-100 60-
A-2, A-4 0 100 90 30-45 --- NP
sandy loam. 90-100 60-90 30-45 NP
28-60:Sandy loam, SM
I loamy sand. A-2 0 100 90-100 50-85 15-30 ---
8, 79, 80 NP
Weld 0-8 (Loam ML, A-4
CL-ML 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 20-30 NP-10
8-15:Silty clay loam, CL A-6, A_7 0
silty clay. 100 100 95-100 85-95 35-50 15-30
15-60:Silt loam, loam CL-ML, CL A-4, A-6 0 100 95-100 85-100 60-85 20-35 5-15
1* 82*, 83*:
Wiley : 0-11 :Silt loam CL-ML, CL A-
:11-60:Silty clay loam, CL 0-
6, A-6 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 25-35 5-15
silt loam. A_6 0 100 100 90-100
70-95 25-35 10-20 Colby
0-7 :Loam CL-ML A-4
7-60:Silt loam, loam CL-ML 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30 5-10
A-4 0 100 100 90-100 85-100 25-30
5-10
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit.
•
•
•
•
•
•
130 SOIL SURVEY
TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued
Risk of corrosion_ Erosion Wind
Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Soil Salinity Shrink- - factors erodi-
map symbol bility water reaction swell Uncoated Concrete 1 bility
capacity potential steel K i T group
In In/hr In/in 1'" Mmhos/em ----
29, 30 : 0-12 2.0-20 0.11-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.24 1 5 3
Julesburg 112-27 2.0-20 0.11-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 Low - Moderate Low 0.24
127-60 >6.0 0.05-0.13 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.20
31 , 32, 33, 34 1 0-12 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.9-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.32 5 4L
Kim :12-60 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.17 7.9-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.32
:
3511:
Loup 1 0-16 6.0-20 0.10-0.14 6.6-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0. 17 5 2
:16-60 6.0-20 0.06-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0. 17
Boel 1 0-14 6.0-20 0.10-0.12 6.6-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.17 5 2
114-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.07 6.6-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0. 17
:
36•: :
Midway 1 0-13 0.06-0.2 0.12-0.17 7.9-9.0 2-8 High High Low 0.43 1 4
13 --- --- --- ---
•
Shingle 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L
6-18 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2 Moderate High Low 0.49
18 --- --- ---
37, 38 0-9 2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20 2 3
Nelson 9-30 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.13 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20
30 --- --- ---
39, 40, 41, 42 0-9 0.2-2.0 0.15-0.20 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate Moderate Low 0.24 5 6
Nunn 9-29 0.06-0.6 0.15-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.28
29-60 0.2-2.0 0.10-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24
43 , 0-9 , 2.0-6.0 0.10-0.14 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low 0. 15 5 3
Nunn 1 9-2910.06-0.6 0.15-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.28
129-601 0.2-2.0 0.10-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24
I
44, 45 0-10 6.0-20 0.06-0.10 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0. 17 5 2
Olney 10-20 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24
20-25 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.24
25-60, 2.0-6.0 0.06-0.13 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20
46, 47, 48 0-10 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 - Low Moderate Low 0.20 5 3
Olney 10-20 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.24
20-25 0.6-6.0 0.11-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.24
25-60 2.0-6.0 0.06-0.13 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20
49 0-22 6.0-20 0.05-0.08 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.10 5 7
Osgood 22-34 2.0-6.0 0.10-0.13 6.6-7.3 --- Low Low Low 0.17
34-60 6.0-20 0.06-0.08 6.6-8.4 <2 Low Moderate Low 0.10
50, 51, 52, 53 0-12 6.0-20 0.09-0.13 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.10 5 2
Otero 12-60 6.0-20 0.08-0.12 7.4-8.4 <4 Low High Low 0.10
54, -55 0-20 0.6-2.0t ,0.16-0.18 6.6-7.3 --- Low Moderate Low ' 0.20 5 5
Paoli 20-25 >6.0 0.14-0.17 7.4-7.8 <2 Low High Low 0.20
25-60 ->6.0 0.12-0.14 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.20
56, -57 0-9 0.2-0.6 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37 3 6
Renohill 9-32 0.06-0.2 0.14-0.16 6.6-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.32
32 --- --- ---
58, 39 0-6 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L
Shingle 6-18 0.6-2.0 0. 16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2 Moderate High Low 0.49,
18 --- ___ _-_
6011: :Shingle 0-6 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.18 7.4-9.0 <2 Low High Low 0.32 2 4L
6-18 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.21 7.9-9.0 <2 Moderate High Low 0.49
See footnote at end of table.
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 131
TABLE 13.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued
Soil name and Depth Permea- Available Soil Salinity Shrink- Risk of corrosion Erosion Wind
map symbol bility water reaction swell Uncoated Concrete bility
factors bility
capacity
In In/hr In/in potential steel K T group
Et Mm ho s/em
60*:
Renohill 0-9 0.2-0.6 0.17-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37- 3 6
9-32 0.06-0.2 0.14_0. 16 6.6-8.4_ <2 High High Low 0.32
32 --
61 0-11 2.0-6.0 0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 <2
Tassel 11 --- - Low High Low _ 0.24 1 3
62, 63 0-6 2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 7.0-7.8 <2 Low Moderate Low
Terry 6-18 2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 7.0-7.8 <2 Low 0.20 2 3
18-37 2.0-6.0 0.13-0.15 7.9-8.4 <2 Low Hoghrate Low 0.20
37 --- --- -- High Lou 0.20
64, 65 0-8 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 7.9-8.4 <2
Low High Low 0.32 2 4L
Thedalund 8-25 0.6-2.0 0. 16-0.18
25 ___ 7.9-8.4 <2 Low High Lou 0.32
66, 67 0-5 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.18 6.6-7.8
Ulm 5-19 0.06-0.2 0.19-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 High High Low 0.32 5 6
High High Low 0.37
19-60 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.21 7.9-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37
68* 0-60
Ustic --- --- ---
Torriorthents r
69, 70 0-8 6.0-20 0.07-0.12 6.6-7.3
Valent 8-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.10 6.6-7.8 <2 Low Low Low 0.10 5 1
71*: Low Low 0.10
Valent 0-8 6.0-20 0.07-0.12 6.6-7.3 'Low 'Low Low 0.10 5 1
8-60 6.0-20 0.05-0.10 6.6-7.8 <2
Low iLow Low 0.10
Loup 0-16 6.0-20 0.10-0.14 6.6-8.4 <2 Low
16-60 6.0-20 0.06-0.08 7.4-8.4 <2 Low :High Low 0.17 5 2
;High Lou 0.17
72, 73, 74 0-6 6.0-20 0.09-0.11 6.6-7.3 - Low
Vona 6-28 2.0-6.0 0.12-0.14 6.6-8.4 :Low Low 0.10 5 2
<4 Low :High Low 0.10'
28-60 6.0-20 0.08-0.11 7.4-8.4 <4 Low
High Low 0.10'
75, 76, 77 0-6 2.0-6.0 0.11-0.13 6.6-7.3 Lou
Vona 6-28 2.0-6.0 0.12-0.14 6.6-8.4 <4 Hiw Low 0.10 5 3
L
28-60 6.0-20 0.08-0.11 7.4-8.4 <4 ow High Low 0.10
Lou '-High Lou 0.10
78, 79, 80 0-8 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 6.6-7.3 <2 Lou
Low Low Weld 8-15 0.06-0.2 0.19-0.21 6.6-7.8 <2 High Moderate Low 00.28 5 6
15-60 0.6-2.0 0.16-0.21 7.4-8.4 <2 Low High Low 0.28
81*, 82*, 83*:
Wiley 0-11 0.6-2.0 0. 19-0.21 7.4-7.8 <2 Low
High Low11-60 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.21 7.9-8.4 <2 Moderate High Low 0.37 0.37 5 4L
Colby 0-7 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.24 6.6-8.4 <2
7-60 0.6-2.0 0.17-0.22 Low Moderate Low 0.37 5 4L
7.4-8.4 <2 Lou Moderate Low 0.37
* See map unit description for the composition and behavior of the map unit.
Hello