HomeMy WebLinkAbout870394.tiff n5
RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE AMENDMENT OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR LIVESTOCK
CONFINEMENT OPERATION TO ALLOW 3 ,000 HEAD - DOUBLE EIGHT LAND
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public
hearing on the 20th day of May, 1987 , at the hour of 2: 00 p.m. in
the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the
application of Double Eight Land Corporation, 39644 Weld County
Road 39 , Ault, Colorado 80610 , to amend a Use by Special Review
for a livestock confinement operation to allow 3,000 head on the
following described real estate, to-wit:
Part of the NWa, Section 17 , Township 7 North,
Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado
WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by G. Preston
Williams, and
WHEREAS, Section 24 .4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance
provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the
testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request
of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County
Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented
in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this
request shall be approved for the following reasons:
1 . The submitted materials are in compliance with the
application requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld
County Zoning. Ordinance.
2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section
24 .4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
a . The proposed use is consistent with the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Goals and Policies
in that:
(1) The proposed use is located within the Urban
Growth Boundary of ean existing municipality.
PLOgr eC: 4,- 2 rilsu 870394
-'v
Page 2
RE: AMEND USR - DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
(2) The adjacent municipality does not consent to
annex the property.
(3) The proposal does not constitute leapfrog
development.
(4) This proposal is compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan' s transportation and public
facilities and service goals and policies
because it will not impact or require
additional public facilities and services .
b. The proposed use as a livestock confinement
operation is provided for as a Use by Special
Review in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
c. The uses permitted will be compatible with the
existing surrounding land uses and with the future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by
the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, and the Town of
Ault' s Comprehensive Plan. The Town of Eaton has
no objection to this request.
d. No overlay districts affect the site.
e. Use by Special Review Development Standards will
provide adequate protection of the health, safety,
and welfare of the neighborhood and County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado , that the application to
amend a Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement
operation to allow 3 , 000 head on the hereinabove described parcel
of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following
conditions:
1 . The attached Development Standards for the Use by
Special Review permit be adopted and placed on the Use
by Special Review plat prior to recording the plat.
2. The Use by Special Review plat shall be delivered to the
Department of Planning Services Office and be ready to
be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and
Recorder within 30 days after approval by the Board of
County Commissioners.
870394
Page 3
RE: AMEND USR - DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 20th day of
May, A.D. , 1987.
' . 44UAIZ/t4�2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: WELD COU RA
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board Gor o a , a ' man
BY: �� C. IIrby, Pro em
Dep�o(unty Clerk
O.�
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. B ntner
Ofe-o0 J ue • e J h n
County Attorney
Frank Yamaguchi
870394
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199: 73: 14
1. The Use by Special Review permit is for an amendment to an
existing Use by Special Review for a livestock confinement
operation increasing the capacity from 2, 100 head to 3 ,000
head of cattle as submitted in the application materials on
file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to
the Development Standards stated herein . The maximum number
of cattle permitted shall be 3 , 000 . The livestock
confinement operation shall be used for cattle only. The
confinement of other animals shall require an amendment to
the Use by Special Review permit.
2. No structures shall be allowed within 20 feet from the top
edge of the bank of the Larimer and Weld Canal.
3. Liquid waste from the retention pond shall be pumped to farm
ground for use as irrigation water and soil conditioner, and
shall not be discharged to State waters.
4. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing and
maintaining the runoff retention and containment facilities
in accordance with the engineered report as approved by the
Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control
Division. All runoff retention and containment facilities
shall meet and be maintained in accordance with the State
Health Department' s Guidelines of Feedlot Runoff Containment
Facilities and standards stated herein. The applicant shall
be responsible for any additional requirements issued by the
Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control
Division.
5. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with
the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with the Design Standards of Section 24. 5 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
7. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24 . 6 of the
Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
870394
1 � J
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
8. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, Weld County
Department of Planning Services, and the Colorado Department
of Health shall be granted access onto the property at any
reasonable time in order to insure the activities carried out
on the property comply with the Development Standards stated
herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations.
9. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans
shown herein and governed by the foregoing Standards and all
applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations
from the plans or Standards as shown or stated shall require
the approval of an amendment of the permit by the Weld County
Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners
before such changes from the plans or Standards are
permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of
the Department of Planning Services.
10. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for
complying with all of the foregoing Standards. Noncompliance
with any of the foregoing Standards may be reason for
revocation of the permit by the Board of County
Commissioners.
870394
r
HEARING CERTIFICATION
DOCKET NO. 87-16
RE: AMEND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION
TO ALLOW 3,000 HEAD - DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
A public hearing was conducted on May 20, 1987, at 2:00 P.M. , with the
following present:
Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy, Chairman
Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Pro-Tem
Commissioner Gene Brantner
Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson
Commissioner Frank Yamaguchi
Also present:
Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff
Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison
Planning Department representative, Lanell Swanson
The following business was transacted:
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated April 13, 1987, and
duly published April 30, 1987, in the Johnstown Breeze, a -public
hearing was conducted to consider the request of Double Eight Land
Corporation to amend a Use by Special Review for a livestock
confinement operation to allow 3,000 head. Lee Morrison, Assistant
County Attorney, made this matter of record. Lanell Swanson, Planning
Department representative, read the favorable recommendation of the
Planning Commission, which is subject to two Conditions and ten
Development Standards, into the record. G. Preston Williams, vice
president of Double Eight Land Corporation, came forward to answer
questions of the Board. He stated that he has no problem with the
proposed Development Standards. No public comment was made concerning
this request. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the request to
amend the Use by Special Review, subject to the Conditions and
Development Standards as recommended. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Brantner and carried unanimously.
This Certification was approved on the 27th day of May, 1987.
APPROVED:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: V1.10,/~.4444.0.4421tarti WELD COUN 0
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and C erk to.the Board Gor . ac , a an
By: & PFate—L
Deputy County Clerk C.W. rby, ro-Te
Gene R. Brantner
J:• ue Jo so' 4/
Frank Yamaguchi
TAPE #87-36
DOCKET #87-16
PLO115
CC54/. Jt
1
ATTENDANCE RECORD
PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the name of the applicant
or Docket # for the hearing you are attending.
TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: MAY 20, 1987
DOCKET # 87-16 AMEND USR-LIVESTOCK CONFINEMENT OPERATION, DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
DOCKET # 87-12 TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION, CIRCLE"M"/McMILL, INC.
DOCKET #
NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING
/-c), 64:"6- 54:-/---- gab' ? 9 11/4/1
�`2 1 �/; •
I7/:L�. c1r z6,.
• tig41 '2�<J ,
ri/it 6-77
I !zaCS _ -Y,2cc5c_ t c NA\ c 1\e'S IL.L
04/3 5 o,06`l . z,vA RI IA) , Jc-iik 1,i�G- `° • K
���-� Z 6C
^�G 2 1/�r
�✓�G-P/f ai t y.e-
Ve-GI,L / . 0 //L— ( `it1 e,e92. @o .
pvUUtKht t ( Amu // ii ii
it //
„,
-149 4'r 7. Or- 7,L1b' 618. G1/C1404.41/4 f 6" ,/k A%l/ ii (.
1/�J CS Yo i4e r WC LCX Cot, l c? (� in C 1t1 i i( c
✓4
8'70394
4
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
May 5, 1987
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on May 5,
1987, in the Weld County Commissioner's Hearing Room, Weld County Centennial
Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to
order by the chairman, Jack Holman, at 1:30 p.m.
Tape 278 - Side 2
ROLL CALL
Lydia Dunbar Present
Ivan Gosnell Absent - Called in
LeAnn Reid Present
Louis Rademacher Present
Lynn Brown Present
Paulette Weaver Present
Ann Garrison Present
Jack Holman Present
Also present: Lanell Swanson, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant
County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary.
A quorum was present.
The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning
Commission held on April 21, 1987, was approved as distributed.
The Chairman announced Shawn Elworthy is requesting his case be postponed.
Therefore, this request will be heard first in case the proposal is
postponed and there are people in the audience who have come to hear this
presentation.
CASE NUMBER: USR-789:87:14
APPLICANT: Shawn Elworthy
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a commercial welding shop in the
A (Agricultural) Zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M.,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Adjacent to an annexed portion of the Town of Windsor, east of
Weld County Road 15, and south of Weld County Road 76.
APPEARANCE:
Shawn Elworthy, property owner and applicant, asked that this case be
continued until the May 19, 1987, meeting of the Planning Commission because
one of his key witnesses is out of town, and he just discovered yesterday
that the Planning Staff's recommendation is for denial. He would like
additional time to respond to this recommendation.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 2
The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience for whom continuance
would pose a hardship.
Denise Hamernick, surrounding property owner, reported both she and her
husband work in Fort Collins. They moved here because they did not want
anything industrial or commercial in the area. The Elworthy's work in the
building until late at night and disturb the neighborhood.
The Chairman stated the Planning Commission does not want to hear any
testimony at this time. The question is: should this case be continued.
Jim Seifken, surrounding property owner, stated he did not want to see this
case continued because Mr. Elworthy should have had ample time to prepare
for this request.
Andi McCoy, surrounding property owner, reported she had taken off work to
come to this hearing. She asked that the request not be continued.
MOTION:
Lynn Brown moved Case Number USR-789:87:14 for Shawn Elworthy for a Use by
Special Review permit for a commercial welding shop in the Agricultural zone
district be heard today because of the imposition it would cause the
surrounding property owners to continue the case to May 19. That testimony
not be heard from the surrounding property owners and then the request be
continued because of the difficulty in maintaining continuity that this
presents, and that this request be moved back to its original position on
the agenda. Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. No further discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes; Louis
Rademacher - No; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Ann
Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes. Motion carried with six voting for the
motion and one voting against the motion.
CASE NUMBER: USR-780:87:4
APPLICANT: Thomas McCauley (Continued from April 7, 1987)
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on
a parcel of land under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni SW} of Section 18, TBN, R67W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: 9 miles west and 1 mile north of Pierce.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 3
APPEARANCE:
Gerry McRae, P.E., McRae and Short, Inc. , represented the applicants. He
asked that testimony apply to both of this case and the following case.
Information on these two cases was presented on April 7, 1987. The Planning
Commission continued these cases to allow more information from the Soil
Conservation Service to be obtained.
The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who represented the
Soil Conservation District.
Milton Baumgartner, Chairman, West Greeley Soil Conservation, the Soil
Conservation Authority for this area. They do not have any detailed
information on land divisions. This would take a case by case review. Most
housing areas do follow their recommendations. There is not an erosion
problem in this area because most of the land has not been broken out of
native grasses. He suggested covenants or standards which contain the Soil
Conservation Services' recommendations be filed with the deed. The Soil
Conservation Service is a referral agency; not an enforcement agency.
Tom Varra, owns property in the area and is on the Soil Conservation Board.
This area is going to have a lot of pressure for development. It lays along
a ridge with a beautiful view and is close to Fort Collins. Development in
Larimer County and the Budweiser plant, which is about one mile away, have
• already changed this area considerably.
Lee Morrison explained when the Board of County Commissioners cannot be
enforcement officers.
Tape 279 - Side 1
Unbroken land requires a plowing permit.
Jerry McRae reported this 160 acre site is presently farmed in dryland
wheat. He asked that Development Standard #2 be rewritten to protect this
land when the farming operation is discontinued.
AMENDMENT:
Lynn Brown moved a new Condition 4 be added to read as follows:
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil
conservation plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning Services.
Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 4
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
AMENDMENT:
Lynn Brown moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to read as
follows:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property.
Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Milton Baumgartner stated he felt a soil conservation plan should be
required continuous to subsequent owners because in this area twenty acres
of land is required for a cow and a calf.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to include
the following:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property, and the property shall remain within the
boundaries of the West Greeley Soil Conservation District or
its successors.
Motion seconded by Lynn Brown
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 5
Clyde Abbott, Chairman, Platte Valley Soil Conservation Service, asked if
these rules were going to be just for this development or will they be
County wide? He asked the Planning Commission to realize they are dealing
with nine separate soil conservation districts within the County and he
feels there should be something County wide. Now is the time to work out a
plan, County wide, that all districts could participate in.
Chad Noland, surrounding property owner, reported he owns property within
one—half mile of this request. He also has three cases coming before the
Planning Commission today. They are not talking about a large development.
He is concerned that the land should not be disturbed as this is marginal
agricultural land, and rules should be set and enforced to preserve it.
The Chairman asked the applicant if he had reviewed the recommendations,
conditions, and development standards as outlined by the Department of
Planning Services staff. He stated they have and have no objections to
these as amended.
•
MOTION:
Ann Garrison moved Case Number USR-780:87:4 for Thomas McCauley for a Use by
Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a parcel of land
under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners
with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based on the fact
• that the County cannot, with the current resources it has available, enforce
any regulations we setdown to protect the environment. Also, she would like
to tie her recommendation to the new Comprehensive Plan, page 26, #4 within
the Agricultural Policies and also on page 41, conditions 4, 5, and 7.
Condition #5 says that new residential development shall demonstrate
compatibility with existing surrounding land-use in terms of general use,
building heights, scale, density, traffic, dust, and noise. Condition #7
says that there should be conservation of natural site features such as
topography, vegetation, and water courses should be considered in project
design. She does not believe that at this time we are able to fulfill
conditions either 4, 5, or 7 given this residential development . Motion
seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes, she agrees with
everything Ann stated. Unfortunately we don't have the staff to design or
enforce plans. If people would act responsibly we would not have to worry,
but unfortunately we have too many cases where they don't. At this time
more breakup of these- lands is not in
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 6
the best interests of the County or the people in the area. Louis
Rademacher - No, because they say Greeley should be up there and prime
agricultural land would then still be intact, but they don't want to develop
up there when this land is not suitable for farming and doesn't bring in
revenue for the County. He feels this development would bring in some
•
revenue for the County. LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - No; Lydia
Dunbar - No, because we do have to have some people for our land too. Ann
Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes, because once we begin a project like this
there is no stopping it. Therefore it is better to stop it here than to
allow it to continue. He realizes that we have have approved a couple of
land splits such as this in this area, but he is afraid that if we don't
stop it now it will be a continuous thing for all of the property in this
area, and dividing the property is probably not the best thing to do with
the property in this particular area. Motion carried with four voting for
the motion and three voting against the motion.
Tape 279 - Side 2
CASE NUMBER: USR-781:87:5
APPLICANT: Thomas McCauley (Continued from April 7, 1987)
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on
a parcel of land under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Si SW} of Section 18, TON, R67W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: 9 miles west and 1 mile north of Pierce.
APPEARANCE:
Jerry McRae, P.E., McRae and Short, Inc., represented the applicant. He
asked that comments from the previous testimony be entered into the record
and applicable to this request.
Lee Morrison explained that even though the comments from the previous case
are applied to this request, the Planning Commission should amend the
conditions and development standards to correspond to the previous
amendments.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Condition 114 be added to read as follows:
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil
conservation plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning Services.
Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 7
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to read as
follows:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property, and the property shall remain within the
boundaries of the West Greeley Soil Conservation District or
its successors.
Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
. decision. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Ann Garrison moved Case Number USR-781:87:5 for Thomas McCauley for a Use by
Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a parcel of land
under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners
with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial based upon the
reasons outlined in USR-780:87:5. Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes, for the reasons
stated in USR-780. Louis Rademacher - No, for the same reasons stated in
USR-780; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - No, because clearly we have heard
evidence that this is marginal land for agricultural purposes. It is
adjacent to a lot of rapid development within Larimer County, and we have
not heard clear-cut evidence that reducing the plots to 80 acres is going to
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 8
either enhance or worsen the state of the soil conservation. Lydia
Dunbar - No, for the reasons stated in USR-780; Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack
Holman - Yes, for the same reasons stated in USR-780. Motion carried with
four voting for the motion and three voting against the motion.
CASE NUMBER: USR-782:87:6 (Continued from April 7, 1987)
APPLICANT: Chad and Jaymie Noland
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on
a parcel of land under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni SW} of Section 7, T8N, R67W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: 9.5 miles west of Pierce and 2.5 miles north of Pierce.
APPEARANCE:
Chad Noland, property owner and applicant, passed around pictures of this
area. These were retained as evidence. He asked that testimony be applied
to all three cases. This land is different from the previous two cases
because this is grassland and has never been broken out of native grasses.
These proposed tacts are one—half mile wide by one—fourth mile long. Taxes
on twenty acres of dryland are twenty dollars per year, but taxes on the
eighty acres his house is on are $1,200 per year. They will require no new
utilities that have not been run into the area. The County road is already
maintained by the County.
Lee Morrison reminded the Planning Commission that eighty acres of irrigated
or 160 acres of dryland are required for a single family residence in rural
Weld County.
The Chairman called for discussion from the audience.
John Byrns, Fort Collins, stated if this request is granted he wants to
build him home on one of these parcels. He would intend to be a guardian of
the land. It is unsuitable for farming and grazing in parcels of this size.
He would be willing to comply with the soil conservation recommendations.
It is unfair to punish those who intend build homes and live in this area as
the size of the parcel is no indication of soil erosion.
Dwight Morgan, KCOL Corporation, reported they have a four hundred foot high
radio tower on this site and they expect to install a new nine hundred and
twenty-one foot tower. They have obtained approval from the FCC to install
this new tower and it would have no environmental hazards. They are
requesting easements for these anchor points. Personally, he feels Chad
Noland is doing the right thing with this land.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 9
Lanell Swanson reported the KCOL radio tower site is described under
Conditional Use Permit #1 and if they install a new tower they will need to
apply to amend their Conditional Use Permit.
Tom Varra, surrounding property owner, stated he is not speaking for the
Soil Conservation Service now, but for himself. He wants the Planning
Commission to know Mr. Noland has 320 acres and he feels it should not be
broken down any smaller than 80 acres parcels because in the future it may
bring congestion to the area and the land should remain in compliance with
the Comprehensive Plan.
Lanell Swanson reminded the Planning Commission members Condition #4 and
Development Standard #2 should be amended to comply with those in USR-780
and 781 to insure the land will remain in native grasses.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Condition 1/4 be added to read as follows:
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil
conservation plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning Services.
Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to read as
follows:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property, and the property shall remain within the
boundaries of the West Greeley Soil Conservation District or
its successors.
Motion seconded by Lynn Brown.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 10
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
The Chairman asked the applicant if he had reviewed the recommendations,
conditions, and development standards as outlined by the Department of
Planning Services' staff. He stated he has and has no objections to them as
amended.
The Chairman asked that the recommendations, conditions and development
standards be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these
proceedings.
MOTION:
Lydia Dunbar moved Case Number USR-782:87:6 for Chad and Jaymie Noland for a
Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a parcel
of land under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval
based upon the recommendations as outlined by the Department of Planning
Services staff and the conditions and Development as recommended by the
staff and amended by the Planning Commission and the testimony heard by the
members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Louis Rademacher.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - No; Louis
Rademacher - Yes; LeAnn Reid - No; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Ann
Garrison - No; Jack Holman - No. Motion denied with three voting for the
motion and four voting against the motion.
MOTION:
Ann Garrison moved Case Number USR-783:87:6 for Chad and Jaymie Noland for a
Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a parcel
of land under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial for
the same reasons outlined in USR-780. Motion seconded by Paulette Weaver.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver — Yes, for the same reasons
given for USR-780. Louis Rademacher — No, for the same reasons given for
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 11
USR-780; LeAnn Reid - Yes, because they own six thousand acres of dryland
farmland. There is an adjacent piece of property which is forty acres. The
third property owner from the city is now living on this parcel and they
have not taken care of it properly. Lynn Brown - No, for reasons previously
stated. Lydia Dunbar - No, for reasons given earlier. Ann Garrison - No;
Jack Holman - No, for reasons stated earlier. Motion carried with four
voting for the motion and three voting against the motion.
CASE NUMBER: USR-783:87:7
APPLICANT: Chad and Jaymie Noland
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on
a parcel of land under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Si NW} of Section 7, T8N, R67W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: 9.5 miles west of Pierce and 2.5 miles north of Pierce.
APPEARANCE:
Chad Noland, property owner and applicant, asked that previous testimony
apply to this request.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience.
Tape 280 - Side 1• —
Ernie Austin, member of the audience, stated the Planning Commission has
been trying for two hours to decide if the cow will eat the grass or will it
blow away. He has heard no objections from the audience, but some of the
board act like they are experts. Still, it would take forty acres to graze
a cow for two months. He lives just west of the Country Club and when the
wind blows the dust is terrible and this is certainly contiguous to a
municipality and a well planned development. The only negative comments he
has heard today have come from the Planning Commission.
Lanell Swanson reminded the members of the Planning Commission the same
changes should be made to the staff's recommendations as on the previous
cases.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Condition_¢4 be added to read as follows:
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil
conservation plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning Services.
Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 12
The Chairman called for discussion from the Planning Commission. There was
no further discussion.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to read as
follows:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property, and the property shall remain within the
boundaries of the West Greeley Soil Conservation District or
its successors.
Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. No further discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Lynn Brown wished to go on record that the amendments to the conditions and
development standards of these requests are being made because the
Department of Planning Services' staff recommendations are for approval.
MOTION:
Paulette Weaver moved Case Number USR-783:87:6 for Chad and Jaymie Noland
for a Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a
parcel of land under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for
denial for the same reasons outlined in USR-780. Motion seconded by Ann
Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver — Yes, for the same reasons
given for USR-780. Louis Rademacher — No, for the same reasons given for
USR-780; LeAnn Reid — Yes, for reasons previously stated. Lynn Brown — No,
for reasons prevously stated. Lydia Dunbar — No, for reasons given earlier.
Ann Garrison — No; Jack Holman — No, for reasons stated earlier. Motion
carried with four voting for the motion and three voting against the motion.
•
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 13
CASE NUMBER: USR-784:87:8
APPLICANT: Chad and Jaymie Noland
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on
a parcel of land under the minimum lot size.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni NWg of Section 7, T8N, R67W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: 9.5 miles west of Pierce and 2.5 miles north of Pierce.
APPEARANCE:
Chad Noland, property owner and applicant, asked that the testimony heard on
the previous two cases be applicable to this request.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was no further discussion.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Condition #4 be added to read as follows:
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil
conservation plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be submitted to the Department of
Planning Services.
Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
AMENDMENT:
Paulette Weaver moved Development Standard Number 2 be amended to read as
follows:
2. The Soil Conservation Plan approved by the West Greeley Soil
Conservation District shall be maintained and complied with
on the property, and the property shall remain within the
boundaries of the West Greeley Soil Conservation District or
its successors.
Motion seconded by Ann Garrison
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. No further discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the members of the Planning Commission for their
decision. Motion carried unanimously.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 14
MOTION:
Paulette Weaver moved Case Number USR-783:87:6 for Chad and Jaymie Noland
for a Use by Special Review permit for a single family dwelling unit on a
parcel of land under the minimum lot size be forwarded to the Board of
County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for
denial for the same reasons outlined in USR-780. Motion seconded by Ann
Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. No further discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes, for the same reasons
given for USR-780. Louis Rademacher - No, for the same reasons given for
USR-780; LeAnn Reid - Yes, for reasons previously stated. Lynn Brown - No,
for reasons previously stated. Lydia Dunbar - No, for reasons given
earlier. Ann Garrison - No; Jack Holman - No, because he has been on the
Planning Commission for seven years and has seen what rural housing
developments can become. Especially after they have changed hands a few
times. Some of these are definitely not an asset to the County. Motion
carried with four voting for the motion and three voting against the motion.
The chairman called a break at 3:40 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 3:50
p.m.
CASE NUMBER: USR-789:87:14
APPLICANT: Shawn Elworthy
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a commercial welding shop in the
A (Agricultural) Zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Wi of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M.,
Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Adjacent to an annexed portion of the Town of Windsor, east of
Weld County Road 15, and south of Weld County Road 76.
APPEARANCE:
Shawn Elworthy, property owner and applicant, reported they put up a
building on this property and they intend to build a house here. The
building erected on the property is a large garage and he does some welding
here which he considers a hobby because he has a good job. He was not aware
that he needed a Use by Special Review permit. He was also not aware he
needed a building permit because the property is in the agricultural zone
and is not in a subdivision. He did obtain an electrical permit and when
the inspection was done, nothing was said about needing a building permit.
After he saw the staff's recommendation was for denial yesterday he wanted
his lawyer at the hearing, but now that the Planning Commission has not
granted him a continuance he will not be able to have legal counsel present.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 15
The building was put up in November. He makes cattle guards and truck
bumpers which he feels can be considered agricultural.
Mrs. Elworthy stated when they purchased the property it had been cited by
the Health Department because there was a dump on the property. They have
cleaned the this up and the property is now neat and clean.
Lee Morrison explained an accessory use has to be an accessory to a use that
is allowed and must be related to the principal use.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience.
Jerry Offenback, surrounding property owner, presented petitions signed in
opposition to this request. These were also presented at the Windsor
Planning Commission Meeting. These were retained as evidence.
Jim Seifken, surrounding property owner, stated the building was put up
without a permit and he has been doing commercial welding. He is against
approving this request.
Tape 280 — Side 2
Jim Rutz, surrounding property owner, spoke against this request.
Andi McCoy, area resident, spoke against this request.
Jane Paul, area resident, was not against this request being granted.
Lisa Hamernick, surrounding property owner, reported Mr. Elworthy has
installed a dirt bike track.
Scott Paul, area property owner, stated the building is a nice looking
building. It is his feeling Mr. Elworthy has tried to work with the people
in the area.
The Chairman asked Lanell Swanson to read the recommendation of the
Department of Planning Services' staff into the record. The recommendation
is for denial.
Shawn Elworthy stated the dirt bike track is only used by himself and his
sons.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 16
MOTION:
Lynn Brown moved Case Number USR-789:87:14 for Shawn Elworthy for a Use by
Special Review permit for a commercial welding shop in the agricultural zone
district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning
Commission's recommendation for denial based upon the recommendations of the
Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the members
of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes, based on the staff's
extended comments; Louis Rademacher - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn
Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes,
based on the staff's comments. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: USR-788:87:13
APPLICANT: Eva Jean Sheets
REQUEST: Use by Special Review permit for a Home Business (Beauty Shop) in
the A (Agricultural) Zone district.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Sandy Knoll Estates, Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Adjacent to the Town of Kersey, west of Weld County Road 53, and
north of Sandy Knoll Boulevard.
APPEARANCE:
Eva Jean Sheets, property owner and applicant. The work pertaining to this
request is already done. Everything was installed according to the Building
Code Ordinance. The state has also approved this request. There will be
just one operator and one chair. She will be leasing this business to a
qualified operator. She has contacted most of the neighbors personally and
they have no objection.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked Mrs. Sheets if she had reviewed the recommendations,
conditions, and development standards set forth by the Department of
Planning Services staff. She stated she has no objections to any of these
items.
The Chairman asked the recommendation, conditions, and development standards
be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 17
MOTION:
Lydia Dunbar moved Case Number USR-788:87:13 for Eva Jean Sheets for a Use
by Special Review permit for a home business (beauty shop) in the
agricultural zone district be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners
with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based on the
recommendation, conditions, and development standards as outlined by the
Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the
members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by LeAnn Reid.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Discussion followed.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes; Louis
Rademacher - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes;
Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73: 14
APPLICANT: Double Eight Land Corporation c/o John R. Sundin
REQUEST: Amend Use by Special Review permit to increase capacity of
Livestock Confinement Operation from 2,100 head to 3,000 head of
cattle.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW$ of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault and approximately 1.5 miles
north of Eaton.
APPEARANCE:
G. Preston Williams, part owner and manager, Double Eight Land Corporation.
In their marketing plans they felt they needed to have the additional
capabilities as outlined in the Department of Planning Services' staff
recommendations. They had one pen on the property that did not comply with
Use by Special Review permit #199. They updated their waste disposal site
recently. The feed lot operation takes up about eight acres of the total
thirty acres.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked the applicant if he had reviewed the recommendations,
conditions, and development standards as outlined by the staff. He stated
they have and have no problems with them.
The Chairman asked that reading these items into the record be dispensed
with and that they be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these
proceedings.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 18
MOTION:
Louis Rademacher moved Case Number Amended USR-199:73: 14 for Double Eight
Land Corporation for an amended Use by Special Review permit to increase the
capacity of a Livestock Confinement Operation from 2,100 head to 3,000 head
of cattle. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. There was no further discussion.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes; Louis
Rademacher - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes;
Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE NUMBER: SCH-3:87:2
APPLICANT: Barbara Johnson _
REQUEST: Substantial change hearing.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E} SW} of Section 5, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado.
LOCATION: North side of State Highway 119 and west side of Weld County Road
3-1/2.
APPEARANCE:
LaVern Nelson, P.E. , Nelson Engineers, represented the applicant. This is a
request for a Substantial Change Hearing. In 1983 this property was rezoned
from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development. The District Court reversed
this decision to return the property to agricultural primarily because there
were no adequate sanitary facilities. Since that time the County has
adopted a new Comprehensive Plan with allows an I-25 Mixed Use Development
area and the property will be within the St. Vrain Sanitation District.
Tape 281 — Side 1
He discussed changes in the area. These changes have created a lot of new
jobs and these workers now need convenient living quarters.
Lee Morrison asked the members of the Planning Commission to confine their
discussion the merits of whether there have been substantial changes in the
facts or the law to warrant a new hearing. The Johnsons will need to put
into the record what they feel their changes are. Not everything has to
change in order to hear this request again. It appears changes to correct
what the judge found lacking would be reason for a rehearing. This is not
actually a rehearing, but an opportunity to resubmit the application.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 19
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked Lanell Swanson to read the recommendation of the
Department of Planning Services' staff into the record.
MOTION:
Louis Rademacher moved Case Number SCH-3:87:2 for Barbara Johnson for a
Substantial Change hearing be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners
with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the
recommendation of the Department of Planning Services' staff and the
testimony heard by the members of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded
by Lynn Brown.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience.
Discussion followed concerning what constituted a substantial change.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - No, the only significant
change she sees is the future availability of the St. Vrain Sanitation
District and she is making the judgement that this is not a substantial
change and does not warrant a new application. Louis Rademacher - Yes;
LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes; Ann Garrison - Yes;
Jack Holman - Yes, primarily to hear the change. He realizes there are some
things here that really don't change at all as far as some of the facts, and
some of the Planning Commission's recommendations for denial at the time of
the first hearing, but he does want to allow the applicants a new hearing.
Motion carried with six voting for the motion and one voting against the
motion.
CASE NUMBER: USR-790:87:15
APPLICANT: Roggen Telephone Cooperative
REQUEST: A Use by Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a Public
Utility.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} NW} of Section 6, T2N, R67W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block
1, Roggen, Colorado.
LOCATION: 519 Front Street, Roggen, Colorado.
APPEARANCE:
Elizabeth Hyde represented the Roggen Telephone Company. They want to add
on an office area to the building that has been used by the phone company
since 1959. This will be a thirty-four by twenty-four addition. The phone
company currently employees three people and they do not anticipate any
changes.
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
May 5, 1987
Page 20
The Chairman asked the representative if they had reviewed the
recommendations, conditions, and development standards as defined by the
Department of Planning Services' staff. She stated they have no objections
to these.
t The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There
was none.
The Chairman asked that reading the recommendations, conditions, and
development standards into the record be dispensed with and that they be
filed with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings.
MOTION:
Lynn Brown moved Case Number USR-790:87:15 for the Roggen Telephone
Cooperative for a Use by Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a
Public Utility be approved by the Planning Commission based upon the
recommendations, conditions, and development standards as outlined by the
Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the members
of the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar.
The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning
Commission. Since this request is for a Major Fof a Public Utility the
Planning Commission has the authority to approve it and does not make a
recommendation to the Board. However, if the Planning Commission's
recommendation is for denial the applicant may request a hearing with the
Board of County Commissioners.
The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning
Commission for their decision. Paulette Weaver - Yes; Louis
Rademacher - Yes; LeAnn Reid - Yes; Lynn Brown - Yes; Lydia Dunbar - Yes;
Ann Garrison - Yes; Jack Holman - Yes. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
f 5c5 U+-L Q-1`GOO
Bobbie Good
Secretary
Drf
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSIO MAY ' 1987 ;'
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO L�
,
coLo.
Moved by Louis Rademacher that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld
County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
NAME: Double Eight Land Corporation c/o John R. Sundin
ADDRESS: 39644 Weld County Road 39, Ault, CO 80610
REQUEST: Amendment to Use by Special Review Permit for Livestock
Confinement Operation - Increasing capacity from 2, 100 head to
3,000 head of cattle.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
LOCATION: On the east side of Weld County Road 39, approximately .25 miles
south of State Highway 14.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the
following reasons:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application
requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the
applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld
County Zoning Ordinance as follows:
- The proposed use is consistent with the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Goals and Policies in
that:
a. The proposed use is located within the Urban
Growth Boundary of an existing municipality.
b. The adjacent municipality does not consent to
annex the property.
c. The proposal does not constitute leapfrog
development.
d. This proposal is compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan's transportation and public
facilities and service goals and policies
because it will not impact or require
additional public facilities and services.
870394
terH/ff/7
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199:73:14
Page 2
- The proposed use as a livestock confinement operation is
provided for as a Use by Special Review in the A
(Agricultural) Zone District.
- The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing
surrounding land uses and with the future development of
the surrounding area as permitted by the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan, and the Town of Ault's Comprehensive
Plan. The Town of Eaton has no objection to this
request.
- No overlay districts affect the site.
- Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide
adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare
of the neighborhood and County.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request
and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon
the following:
1. The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special
Review permit be adopted and placed on the Use by Special
Review plat prior to recording the plat.
2. The Use by Special Review plat shall be delivered to the
Department of Planning Services office and be ready to be
recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder
within 30 days after approval by the Board of County
Commissioners.
Motion seconded by Lydia Dunbar.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage
Paulette Weaver
Louis Rademacher
LeAnn Reid
Lynn Brown
Lydia Dunbar
Ann Garrison
Jack Holman
870394
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199:73:14
Page 3
The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified
copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board, of County
Commissioners for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of
the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted
on May 5, 1987, and recorded in Book No. XI of the proceedings of the said
Planning Commission.
Dated the 6th day of May, 1987.
(:)\m t A
Bobbie Good
Secretary
870394
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Amended Double Eight Land Corporation
USR- 199:73:14
1. The Use by Special Review permit is for an amendment to an existing Use
by Special Review for a Livestock Confinement Operation increasing the
capacity from 2,100 head to 3,000 head of cattle as submitted in the
application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services
and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. The maximum
number of cattle permitted shall be 3,000. The Livestock Confinement
Operation shall be used for cattle only. The confinement of other
animals shall require an amendment to the Use by Special Review permit.
2. No structures shall be allowed within 20 feet from the top edge of the
bank of the Larimer and Weld Canal.
3. Liquid waste from the retention pond shall be pumped to farm ground for
use as irrigation water and soil conditioner, and shall not be
discharged to State waters.
4. The applicant shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining the
runoff retention and containment facilities in accordance with the
engineered report as approved by the Colorado Department of Health,
Water Quality Control Division. All runoff retention and containment
facilities shall meet and be maintained in accordance with the State
Health Department's Guidelines of Feedlot Runoff Containment
Facilities and standards stated hereon. The applicant shall be
responsible for any additional requirements issued by the Colorado
Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division.
5. All Construction on the property shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance.
6. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with
the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
7. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with
the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
8. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department, Weld County
Department of Planning Services, and the Colorado Department of Health
shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in
order to insure the activities carried out on the property comply with
the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County
Regulations.
870394
•
Development Standards
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199:73:14
Page 2
9. The Use by Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown
hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld
County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans or
Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment
of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of
County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Standards
are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the
Department of Planning Services.
10. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with
all of the foregoing Standards. Noncompliance with any of the
foregoing Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the
Board of County Commissioners.
870394
•
•
INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION
•
• Qw^P d-
Case Number Submitted or Prepared
' Prior'
• - to Hearing At Hearing
•
1:. Application" /, Pages •
2. / Application,plat(s) off., page(s) •
3. PPS Referral Summary Sheet
✓• 4. BPS Recommendation
. 5. DPS. Surrounding Propery Owner Mailing List ✓'
6. DPS Mineral. Owners Mailing List .. ,
7. DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician ✓
• 8. DPS Notice of Hearing ✓
. 9. DPS Case .Summary Sheet ✓
10. DPS: Field Check
11.
•
12.
13. • •
14 •
15.
16. •.
17. . •
.•18. . •
. 19..
•
20. - • . . .
I hereby certify that the /O items identified herein were submitted to the
Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission
•
hearing. I further certify . that these' items were- forwarded to the Clerk to the
Board's office on , 194z.
•
rr ent Pl er
•
•
STATE OF COLORADO ) •
•
COUNTY OF WELD ' )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE, ME THIS 11.1 "' DAY OF \Ma.\ 19Vt ,
• SEAL
1v,1.=
':. - _ te.` \t5 CAN !(1...
• 4e\-.' N TARY PUBLIC I.
My CommissignEi Tres Feb. 13, 1989 .. •
8�.y®394
`MY .r.0MMTSSI0N EXPIRPS S
///� EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
S€%1y
Case �2;7r a e Jr JCod 41 S
Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description
6%. johitthifri;
B.• . eia el. /2.eZ L'itola7;ie . •
A C. W21,4;zi Sewee_1002.4
%37 .WX
15 D. /"Ah /1v�2/1UI1_- 71/77-e2,7 Jaatry 2274);21.1 eicu�T ei
E. 41,464 4z7/2e7 2/-4;fliSe4
2214:102jarese
G. /i(././/17/YU/J� C ✓YJ1./.4.O.GtrJ'�/ _��2A9:�iC -�/c A22G'07?/I7'P/1
H. -an-4 L�ourn �iz .m�/li� 1//222/4
/ I• e�.'.UC.�G i aitZ 726=
s: J.
R.
L.
M.
N.
0.
8700 94
r
•
•
Date: May 5, 1987
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14 -
NAME: Double Eight Land Corporation c/o John R. Sundin
ADDRESS: 39644 Weld' County Road 39; Ault, CO. 80610
REQUEST: Amendment to Use by Special Review Permit. for Livestock
Confinement Operation - Increasing capacity. from 2,100 head to
•
3,000 head of cattle.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 17, T 7N, R65W of the 6th
•
P.M. , Weld County, Colorado
• LOCATION: On the east side of Weld County- Road '39, approximately :25 miles '
•
south of State Highway, 14.
•
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT -THIS REQUEST BE
APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The 'submitted materials are in compliance with application
requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,
•
2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff
that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the •
' Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: '
— The proposed use is consistent with .the . Weld 'County
• Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth. Goals: and Policies in
that:
a. The proposed use is 'located within the Urban
' Growth. Boundary of an existing. municipality.
. b. The adjacent municipality does not consent to
• annex the property. •
-
. c. The proposal does not constitute leapfrog
development.
d. This proposal is compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan's transportation and public
facilities 'and service goals and policies '
. because it will not impact or require
additional public facilities and services.
— _ The proposed use as a livestock confinement operation is
provided for as a Use by Special Review in the A
• (Agricultural) Zone District. -
870394
•
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199:73:14
Page 2
— The uses permitted will be compatible with the existing •
surrounding laud. uses .and with the future development of
•
the surrounding area as permitted by the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan, and the. Town of Ault's Comprehensive
Plan. The Town of Eaton has no objection to this
• request.
• - 'No overlay districts affect the site.
- Use by Special Review Development Standards will provide
• adequate protection of. the health, safety, and welfare
of the neighborhood and County: .
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of .the application
submitted by the applicant, other relevant.information regarding the request
and the responses of .the referral entities which have reviewed this request.
' The Department' of Planning Services staff- recommendation for approval is
conditional upon the following:
•
1. The attached Development Standards for the Use by Special
Review permit be. adopted and placed on the Use by Special
Review plat prior to recording the plat..
2. The Use by Special Review plat shall be delivered to .the
• Department of Planning Services. office and be ready to be
recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder
within 30, days after approval by the Board of County
Commissioners.
•
•
•
870394 •
April 4 , 1987
Weld County Board of Commissioners
Greeley Colorado
With reference to our request for pre-advertisment of our
Use by Special Review permit we will pay for the cost of
the ads to be run in .the Johnstown Breeze as, required by
the County . Please let us know as to the dollar amount
and to whom the funds are payable. Thank-you for your
cooperation in this matter .
Respectf
ouble Eight Land
by John Sundin
•
•
APR 61987
Weld Co. Planning Commission
39644 Weld County Rd . 39
Ault , CO 80610
March 30, "1987
Weld County Commissioners
915 10th St.
Greeley , CO 80631
Dear Sirs :
We are requesting preadvertisement for a land use application
hearing on the Double Eight Land Corp. feedlot . We have a purchase
contract on this parcel and need to save as much time in processing
as we can . Our contract date for closing is May 15 , 1987 . We
appreciate your cooperation in this matter .
S'
VAIIE<ft
John R . Sundin
Double Eight Land .Corrp.Aft,
cc
n aVI
nom_
;�i71
f *IQ
is ,
21987
'•?EELEy.
APR 21987
VA 4 -
Weld Co. Planning Commission
r. '
DEPART''rNT OF PLANNING SERVICES
I$t 6
-- _ - PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
'�� 915 10th STREET
• , tt, x
„t rY GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
xseta, JJJJ I5� ®
7 .hp 4 {' . _.4,......,-,
Y �
R
COLORADO
March 30, 1987
Mr. John R. Sundin -
Double Eight Land Corporation
39644 Weld County Road 39 -
Ault, CO 80610
Re: Amended USR-199:73:14 - Request to amend a Use by Special Review permit
on a parcel of land described part of theN1fl of Section 17, T7N, R65W
of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Sundin:
Your application and related materials for the request described above are
complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with
the Weld County Planning Commission on May 5, 1987, at 1:30 p.m. This
meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing.. Room, first
floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado._.
It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to
answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect
to your application.
It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to
any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in
question or if the property under consideration is located within the
comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our
office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to both the Eaton and
Ault Planning Commissions for their review and comments. It is recommended
that you or a representative be in attendance at both the Eaton and Ault .
Planning Commission Meetings to answer any questions the Commission members
may have with respect to your application.
It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the
property under consideration at least ten (10) days preceding the hearing
date. Sometime prior to April 17, 1987 you or a representative should call
me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than April 24, 1987.
The Department of Planning Services staff will make a recommendation
concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is
the responsibility of an applicant to call the Department of Planning
Services office a few days before the date of the hearing to obtain that
recommendation.
Mr. John R. Sundine
March 30, 1987
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call
me.
Respectfully,
Lanell J. Siianson
Current Planner
LJS:dy
i
FIELD CHECK
FILING NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14 DATE OF INSPECTION: April 21, 1987
NAME: Double Eight Land Corporation
REQUEST: Amended Use by Special Review permit - Livestock confinement
operation.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, RE-968; part of the NWi of Section 17, T7N, R65W
of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately .25 miles south of State Highway 14, on the east
side of Weld County Road 39.
LAND USE: N Agricultural
E Agricultural
S Agricultural
W Agricultural
ZONING: N Eaton Ditch, Pasture, and 1 residence. •
E Irrigated crops
S Irrigated crops
W Irrigated crops
COMMENTS:
Access to this parcel is from Weld County Road 39, which is a paved road.
The terrain slopes gently to the south on the south side of this parcel.
By Q.,n 1 J. sonn Current Pl ner
NOTICE
Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board
of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time
specified. All persons in any manner interested in the amendment to the Use
by Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard.
Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court
reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped
record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's
Office can be contacted for a list of certified court reporters in the area.
If a court reporter is obtained, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be
advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing.
The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting
party.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County
Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board
of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915
10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado.
APPLICANT
DOCKET NO. 87-16 Double Eight Land Corporation
39644 Weld County Road 39
Ault, Colorado 80610
DATE: May 13, 1987
TIME: 2:00 P.M.
REQUEST: Amend Use by Special Review - Livestock confinement -operation
(3,000 head)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NWj , Section 17, Township 7 North, Range 65
West of the 6th P.M.
LOCATION: South of Weld County Road 82 and east of Weld County Road 39;
approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
BY: Mary Reiff, De PR-Mr
DATED: April 13, 1987 1�,///�
APR 131987
PUBLISHED: April 30, 1987, in the Johnstown Breeze
Weld Co. Planning CnmmiSSiea
J
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE.
STATE OF COLORADO I
155
COUNTY OF WELD I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING 1, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I
i The Weld County Planning.Com- am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze;
mission will conduct a ppublic that the same is a weekly newspaper
•
peering o -1;re ust'.1'.30' printed, in whole or inpart, and published
i ._ hearing
to review' a request'• a
i approval of an amendment to a . in the County of Weld, State of Colorado,
Special Review Permit increasing
the capacity of a Livestock and has a general circulation therein; that
Confinment uble Operation trom . said newspaper has been published
Double Eight Land Corporation.
i the parcel or land is n continuously and uninterruptedly in said
-'c''';- as part of the NWy of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M., County of Weld for a period of more than
j - _ Weld County, Colorado, contain- fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the
- i e Pop_erty.30.82 s
Th is located'approxi first publication of the annexed legal notice
mately 1.5 miles east of Ault or advertisement; that said newspaper has
south of Weld CountyRoad 82,
t east of Weld CountyRoad 39, been admitted to the United States mails as
t and approximately' 1.5 miles
r north of Eaton. -, _ second-class matter under the provisions of
The public hearing to be held by • the Act of March 3, 11179, or atiy•
The
Weld County.Planning.Com- amendments 111ereof, slid that said
I mission for the consideration of nCWS a er 15 at
weckl news a Cf riot\'
11 thaepove referenced request will p P y p
p
be conducted in the Weld Count' qualified for publishing legal notices: and
1 Commissioners' Hearing Room,
Fires Floor,Weld County Centers• advertisements within the meaning of 111L•,
nisi- Center, 915 Tenth Street,
Greeley, Colorado. Comments or - laws of the State of Colorado. -
1 request should ruldtetl to the above
'That the annexed legal notice or advertise-
rbjecti sr be outhe de
t - writing to the. Weld County meet was published in the regular and
Department of Planning Services,
915 Tenth Street, Room 342, entire issue of every number of slid weekly ,
J Greeley,Colorado 80631 before newspaper for the period of --�-., consecu-
4 theabove date or presented et
I ' the public hearing on May 5,
1987: live insertions; and that the first
• 1 ;
publication of said notice,was in the issue of
Copies of the :application are said newspaper dturd 7-2..., A.U. Big.;
thavailable for public,inspectionrin
e„':Department of Planning and that the last publication of said notice
3 Services, Room 342;:•:.Weld was in the issue of said newspaper dated
I.f • County Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street,Greeley,Colorado,: • , A.D. 19
- Phone - 358-4000, Extension
t
4400. • In witness whereof I have here7unto set
Jack Holman, chairman my hand this .../..b clay of .
Weld County Planning A.D. 19.67
{ Commission
I To be- published In the Johns-
„ 1 - town Breeze -
1 To be published one(1) time by - Publisher Y April,9, 1987, .L -LJ . CPII615• Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public in and for the jpunty of
We , State of Color /.fr this -- . day of
11A�r .. A.11. 19 ....
•
'_ r —Notary public.
":r; 1.-..;
My commission expires -•'- -
....ss:on Expirm's.June 14, 1987
• ,- south Parish Avenue -: 1, •
Johnstown, CO 80538' -
FLOW SHEET v
n y r) CAr"R Qinindad os,r 99:7,vi5t
APPLICANT: �l j G /7�p�,of �OO-2iQ 3
REQUEST: 1 iu-ek, U 5 2
LEGAL: P(p,,/- ,�YtPj &Lull / 7 - 7- lo Jr iawt(J [JC/2ea
LOCATION: An. J. 5 _- m. etc, p Q-a'& do.. �E,-,�� "f�„¢� or W r R 3,
/. S mu2� a� -714045V 07 DATE BY
Application Received 2 -a) 7-f 7
Application Complete 3--)7-R7
Hearing Date:
‘79 5, 1 '7
Utility Board Hearing D te: IJ f/� 3- 0 7-4'7 ._
PC Sign given to Applicant / 9-8 -8 7 „ L' ,
PC Sign posted By: 072/, 9 7 ,3.-a 7-r'Q 7
Letter to Applicant Drafted 3-g7- 87 /J
ai
Referrals Listed 3 -O .7 - 87 -1�-)
Public Notice Drafted 3—a7- (97
File Assembled
3 c.?D 7
Referrals Mailed 3- qn-137 /
Chaindexed ,nn R 7
Letter to Applicant Mailed 7 c9`J 87 A ,
Public Notice Sent Out By: arm e, ep ) / 987 3-,96-P7(l
Prop. & Mineral Owners Notified By: LE x031987 {
5 -30-8-1 cke
Maps Prepared
Field Check By DPS Staff
S°• .2/- F7 may . .
Field Check-Board Member: -
DPS Recommendation Drafted d _
i1-so- 17 .y1/
DPS Recommendation Typed
at So- 2 7 .�J
Packets Xeroxed
PC/BBA Hearing Action: 11,QA,r,teQ
PC/BOA Resolution
BOA Resolution Sent To Applicant
Meeting Summary or Minutes Filed in Case
Case Sent To Clerk to Board S- e- 1 7 �) ,
CC Sign Given to Applicant
J
CC Sign Posted By: _s t 7 s—e-p 2 Jo.)
CC Hearing: 740,4 1.3 /9j)7Action: Q- ./2AMIvtA C aD-172 _)e.-2.,)o7:60UP_vn. / J
CC Resolution Received -42.e. Tito}
6----19.-g37
a
Plat and/or Resolution Recorded o\
History Card Completed-.
Recorded on Maps and Filed (OM /p')
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 4400
Case Number U.5/ 73:J./ Date Received ....3 -02;7- F1 7
Application Checked by Mylar plat submitted
Application Fee ?nO.QO Receipt Number /-53/5-9
Recording Fee _ ,! 40. oo Receipt Number 341341
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary
signature)
I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County
Planning Commission and Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning
the proposed Use by Special Review Permit on the following described
unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: Pt. NW.* Section 17
T 7 N, R 65 W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review
Permit is proposed:Pt. NW 'r; Section 17 T 7 N, R 65 w
Property Address (if available) 39644 Weld County Rd. 39, Ault, CO 80610
PRESENT ZONE Agriculture OVERLAY ZONES
TOTAL ACREAGE 30.82 +/-
PROPOSED LAND USE 3000 Head Cattle Feedlot
EXISTING LAND USE Cattle Feedlot
SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT:
Name: Double Eight Land Corporation
Address: 39644 Weld County Hd. 39 City Ault Zip 80610 •
Home Telephone # 834-2085 Business Telephone # 834-2085 •
Name: •
Address: City Zip
Home Telephone # Business Telephone #
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : •
Name: Double Eight Land Corporation John R. Sundin
Address: 39644 Weld County Rd. 39 City Ault Zip 80610 _
Home Telephone # 834-2085 Business Telephone # 834-2085
List the owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject
properties of record.
Name: Double Eight Land Corporation
Address: 39644 Weld County Rd. 39 City Ault Zip 50610
Name:
Address: City Zip
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all
statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within the -
application are true and correct to the //best of my knowledge.
�
OF O
COUNTY OF WELD ) „ I
�OUKJ/e Sitter `oLr17 �/
STATE Sig} ure: Owner or Authorized Agent
MAR 27 1987 •
Subscribed s,a _n to befotryt hi's-, day of )12(t//j;' 19n.
r NOTARY_ UBLIC
A°'f Ca�misstcr:Fxprres
1115'48iisAve: •
My commission expires £reele+%,C:0;Irvin
LAND-USE APPLICATION
SUMMARY SHEET
Date: April 28, 1987
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
NAME: Double Eight Land Corporation
ADDRESS: 39644 Weld County Road 39
REQUEST: Amended Use by Special Review permit to increase capacity of
livestock confinement operation.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: Approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault and approximately 1.5 miles
north of Eaton.
SIZE OF PARCEL: 30.82 Acres more or less.
POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS:
The criteria for review of this Use by Special Review permit proposal is
listed in Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
This application proposes to amend a Special Review Permit by increasing the
legal capacity of the livestock confinement operation from 2,100 to 3,000
head of cattle, using the existing improvements.
The Department of Planning Services staff has received specific
recommendations from the following referral entities:
- Weld County Health Department
- Greeley Soil Conservation Service
Copies of these referral responses are included in this summary packet.
Weld County Engineering Department, Town of Eaton, Ault-Pierce Fire
Protection District, and the Weld County Extension Agent, have responded
that they have no objections to this proposal.
Referral responses have not been received from the following:
- Town of Ault Planning Commission
r
REFERRAL LIST
APPLICANT: Double Eight Land Corporation CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
SENT REFERRALS OUT: REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 13, 1987
NO SR NR NO SR NR
t� X County .Attorney •
r X Weld County Health Dept:
X Engineering Department-
X County Extension Agent '
X Town of Ault Planning Commission'
c/o Betty Loewen
P.O. Box 98
Ault, CO 80610 i
X Town of Eaton '
c/o Gary Carsten
Town Administrator J V Rda-ro
P.O. Box 946
Eaton, CO 80615
X Ault Pierce Fire District , - N-
c/o Kenny Dahlgren 44O p6J1-c-t'";^-) I t-c.A) '') 'Lo
Box 36
y-.2a-87 .C -�
Ault, CO 80610 � y�%,��a
t ) opt)
_ aD
X Greeley Soil Conservation Service a-cdA .
4302 9th Street Road I (/
Greeley, CO 80631
a")--8� 666
X Lydia Dunbar
Box 8, Road 89
Grover, CO 80729
NO-No Objection
SR=Specific Recommendations
NR-No Response
. &7q2 2zc 7
D PAF` EN OF PLANNING SERVICES
it i1 _ ,
- x _ �� ._^r� 7.,^r PHONE(303)356.4000 EXT.4400
�1 ... J
�'- 't ; 915 10th STREET
- x,... � - GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
N
01987
, 4 :µ re, i—, .
kib
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
COLORADO
March 30, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
• Enclosed is an application from Double Eight Land Corporation for an Amended
Use by Special Review permit. The parcel of land is described as part--of '
the NW} -of- Section 1'7, T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. -
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault, south of Weld County Road
82, east of Weld County Road 39, and approximately 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. •
Any comments or recommendations you -consider relevant to this request would
. be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure_ prompt consideration of your recommendations.
Please reply by April 13, 1987,! so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation.. Please call Lanell J.. Swanson if you - have any.
questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in
this matter. -
•
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request
. (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons.
0
c ]> .
c •
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
V
Ia request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
A -� of our town for the following reasons:
C
a Co
E
® J 3. X We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our -
i interests:
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
e refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed: %,‘ se Agency: E.,c,(--, e .P r-; .-- .
Date: tr -6, - Len
DEPAU "1ENT OF PLA NING SERVICES
r'r�T _ PHONE(303)356-4000 E .4400
:�.. j ,
915 10th STREET
.._...t GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
r 41 4 ifft
itioaY•j tie
tf% -"4,,rO CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
COLORADO
March 30, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Double Eight Land Corporation for an Amended
Use by Special Review permit. The parcel of land is described as part of
the NW} of Section 17, T7N,. R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault, south of Weld County Road
82, east of Weld County Road 3.9, and approximately 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
. Please reply by April 13, 1987, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson if you: have any
questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in
this matter. .
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request
(does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons.
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons:
3. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Ter
Signed: // Agency: L.,�,2987
Date: T—/0 —f, U
Weld Ca. Planning Commission
DEPAR-{� �NT OF PLANNING SERVICES
r _ PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
,YYX 915 10th STREET
Ii$1
•�: �., GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
h�
i •eetTder 4 t' . CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
COLORADO
March 30, 198.7 •
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from DoublerEight:LandrCorporation for an Amended
Use by Special Review permit. The parcel of land is described as part of
the NW} of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
• - The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault, south of Weld County Road
82, east of Weld County Road 39, and approximately 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
- This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
- Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
Please reply by April 13, 1987, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson if you- have any
questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. •
1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request
(does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
a for the following reasons.
m. D •
pi
mI.
g F-12. kWe do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
f request - (is/is not) compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons: 7l4r/ OF E#A7aii
I yi--.1
3. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
• interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5 P1 se refer enclosed letter.
&!OFEms/S gned: Agency: %d
Date: <="4,
.�ir.anot4 /kewe4 2 1 for
DEPAI' -IENT OF PLANWNG SERVICES
_ PHONE(303)3564000 EXT.4400
975 10th STREET
4.1.tt, GREELEY,COLORADO 80637
\ t
4 '�
•
X-4141 _A 4O
CASE NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
COLORADO
March 30, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from Double Eight Land Corporation for an Amended
Use by Special Review permit.. The parcel of land is described as part of
the NW} of Section 17; T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
submitted is approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault, south of Weld County Road .
82, east of Weld County Road 39, and approximately 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
• Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
. be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
Please reply by April 13, 1987, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson if you- have any
questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in
this matter.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. 7( _ We have r ewed this request and find that the request
(does does not) comply with .our Comprehensive Plan
for the wing reasons. /4gr�au.«wo /
a.;-\M
•
'< r 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this
request (is/is not) compatible with the interests
,-J of our town for the following reasons:
cn -
m
Su2l) n
'J 3. >( We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
l interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
submitted to you prior to:
5. P1 se refer to the enclosed letter.
Signed. Agency:
Date:
r . ,
MEMORAnDU
To -Weld County Planning oat 5 1987
COLORADO From Wes Potter, Director (4,4,4 5�
subject: Feedlot Runoff Facility - Double 8 Land Corporation
I have inspected the construction of the runoff containment pond and associated dikes,
ditches, berms, checks and spillway at ,the Double 8 Land Corporation facility on
39644 WCR 39.
- The facility is complete and acceptable as designed and constructed.
I MAY 6 1987
•
Weld Co. Planting Commission
•
t•G mEmoRAnDu
Wok To Weld County Planning
Date April 2, 1987
�
- COLORADO From Health Protection Services 1' n ,
Case Number: USR-199:73:14 Name: Double Eight Land Corp
Subject:
Health Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. The storm water retention pond shall be maintained in
compliance with the Colorado State Guidelines for Feedlot
Runoff.
2. Liquid waste from the retention pond shall be pumped to farm
ground for use as irrigation water and soil conditioner, and
shall not be discharged to State waters without a discharge
permit. -
By Direction of Ralph R. Wooley, M.D.
o VE
APR 21987
Weld Co. Planing CoomilsSlaa
•
'lV' �{il I\/..,...
9t�YYp� lfir ® Department of Planning Le December 3, 1986 il
Da COLORADO F Health Protection Services — Wes `/J.4,0
Potter _)
Subject: I.S.D.S. Evaluation -- Double 8 Land Corporation
OWNER: Double 8 Land Corporation
ADDRESS: 39644 WCR 39 — Ault
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NW4, 17-7-65
The septic system identified above X is, is not of sufficient size to
accomodate the proposed alteration(s indicated below to the structure(s) served
by this system.
CURRENT FLOW: , ADDITIONS: PROPOSED TOTAL:
Persons 5 5
Bedrooms 3 3
Bathrooms 3 - 3
• Est. GPD
Permit on Record: NAME Double 8 Land Corporation NO. 820036-G
' System Size: TANK 1250 gal . FIELD 900 ` sq. ft.
However, we cannot certify that the system will function as intended in the '
future. If loading changes or malfunctions occur to the system, we require that
our office be notified so that a review of the system' s adequacy be made.
The existing septic system requires the following to accomodate the proposed
alterations to the structure(s) served:
( } Obi -�1�1Q{���%c��%� �� [d
DEPAR, ENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
- s PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
'� f/ 91510th STREET
I •'•
�� , ,,..„ GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
II
{ Y
q 3
S tp, ,yam. ,
44 1 kfirge •
1 �, RECEIVED ,
COLORADO � NUMBER: Amended USR-199:73:14
March 30, 1987 'c1ZO7"'
•
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed is an application from 'Double Eight Land Corporation` for an Amended
Use by Special Review permit. The parcel of land is described as part of
the NW} of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been
- submitted is approximately 1.5 miles east of Ault, south of Weld County Road
82, east of Weld County Road 39, and approximately 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
This application is .submitted to your office for review and recommendations.
Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would
be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of
the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations.
Please reply by: Ap=i1 13, _1987, so that we may give full consideration to
your recommendation. Please call Lanell J. Swanson if you have any
questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in
this. matter.
Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above.
1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request
(does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan
for the following reasons.
2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this '
request (is/is not). compatible with the interests
of our town for the following reasons:.
3. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our
interests.
4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be
- submitted to you prior to:
`.-- , -,Please refer to the enclosed letter.
S1gn'd:LMf ltr/fldw...7,4 cu,Agency:lt, -it,11„,e �`g p C 'N
natal, 9- 7 ?7 (/ d
O_wAa � c m- ‘R
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
SURFACE ESTATE
Application No.
Subject !Property nel,497-1,72.4„,..fr/2,720
d ��ri K ,c
4 /d !,P&7Vo 07o5?/izPE968 //
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,
addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the
Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within
five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to. the application. This list
was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership
update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such
records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list
compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been
assembled within thirty (30) days of the aappplicatio, - • •m -ion date.
�Ou6/ .C/;9ti/{ /a.frld o
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this a
zit
' day of ?a,a/L.fAj , 1917
WITNESS my- hand and official seal.
My-=Commission expires:
'vetrri11is-ic-
- Siantrirse
FY.aires
4,-;;;;A:,-;
Notarub q
AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS
MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE
Application No.
Subject Property agj/ /51/71,L-le://71-72-0
A/ /71 , OF M (37)9 -/72 -fp945
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his
or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names
and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under
the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names
appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or
from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney.
The .fo�regoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 02.4day`of d 3/17Pc' , 19n
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Jarn,My' CommissioniexpilbySe omlt`r
evealey,
C):;ri
n I
Notary ubli'c� '✓/
••
, 03\ • la
� I e` - ••o • a •• Ollie -+ l • •URC L. - — , • ,.
�° 23 JO 1 2e F�1° 26 O° •• 27 • 26 N 1 25 30 21 I 2• 1 2i 25 30I Z•
4 •1813 tal":31:1r. "30\1134.calo a • • • Ow/Creek IL a
! •• \ •!
1..0o •a - ---- ' ono • reo•0 R;. /rfN•0Vr r • _
ft
1 I l aia • . '- Ik I
,' 36 !I , x/32 a 33 )• S 33 • � . ti/I a 31 • 32
♦ 1 •
• 4 34 35 3i 3i I S[ i 33
SO !• a0 0 • a • • r •
IF !
•• • • One a ••O•a • ._• 00 - ._ . - .- _ -•• .- 1 e::t ii•1'••rle ei:w no • 'v- '•or ia75iL4s1Y•-
° i 2 i e 4
3BO i
MI
•
I
I a °... Ill •as / 1 • •
• I
1 i 17.••• 2 7 Ia• • •5 • • I \ '� 1 ,2 r ! • i 10 II • 5
ils
• el ( / "L. I A
w .
&A:3 caw • &rte ••e I:•�`°a • . . I . . I - - U
ti cok. 1 I
•
,raj .
1 ■ • - , , IS , 14 :! I• 7 li 15 a li I li
Mir •-.i.- UCIA - - -- • - - - - -
t. 0 JIt • 11• 1... .. . _••
PockrD a 22 24 [O , 2, 22 , 21• R.s.rw, rrT I_ _ •_oor , 1•Lori p •�o/• •11
•„ NJ . .• a • ` e :.�.:, °• ° • I •Res • 1 t • � ' i • ! • , `LONG • ! • I 1
° 30 • 2e ° • 2• • 7 It 24 • $ 23 ,• 0 30 ' 2/ • ! ••` 25 ° � c 26 i 25' I 301 [e I Se •••r1
I °o1i, 1 .- •0 • • • 0 •• 1 a• 1° •• iO • 1 •0l;■ •O° i • � °' 1 1 ! • ,• C1� ' _ ,•
sa iiir i aim4 Is
•IV �, ,- - - ---- ----
• /32 a 33 ,� 3• 3S v ;i , 31 0,• ! 32 •, 33 l:a 15• ' is
,• 3• ' 31 32 , 33 c
I'Mr �— '-'1''��re;
• •• • 1 - • • °•• ale• -� - •ol�� I ° • l I • I�.
• •TTT : 1 ! ;
• Da MRMETT$ . •; • e r 5 ; • , 3 I 2 1 1 ! i113' •o i • • AIR►ORT• •I •• ! • •
I ! • • • 1 • 1 !lea1 ° 12 T! !At !L!.
• p• to •I " i2 1 1 I 7 . • • 1 1 H01 ARp 10 I ..� I '
lita 1 • �N • gg
LOW' ID I l • 1 .II i �1� �it
•®q i• •. •
1 majrriwi � • � e • \ w •IIu �`'._ e• , 7, o • FA3 V i• • �� •• •• • ••S 311! 352 27 ! ' • rAe 11 3S ® A. ; m. '4" -
BARNFSVILL '
saw Iat 1a ••• T • •• an 5.4 u• ! ••• t• • 1 . ! • I ,? - , - - - - - - - -- -- --
• • t1 LUCERNE • • 1 •. ��\ll i•• • V 1/4-7 I • • •
3 t1 • ./EST.11QP • • 1 ! • , CORNELL a ° . ;® 1 �� �. 1 •YATTME�5 , ® 1 1
SSLO41 i • •24 NI -ia kilo 20 • 21 •.1I 2f • 1 23 1 St j 1 1 30 • I 21 N J7 2 ' •.ry.t 24 I • • • , ' �? R• ,1 1 ' • Y • a
Y I ; 1 I •
! ! !I . • Irk 'viola• a • , • ,��I.
•• • ! Q ! • !
Millitill9-illaliet!'
i
ORffl[rNiav dir
1 • CLOV[Rr 1 1 � .Ilia er r�1._ '1 -- •- --1 25 MI silt . - 6 . a :aw
•kliksillY.1
11 �' , r. H 35 xi IA tl :W;�:• • - • • -!' '` 1 35 '1A ' 3i ! )1
a 1 33 - - - - - -
10 illiMIEN In 41 0 I
.1� r WILD COt1NTr �•• • .� Pg..
— N p �;_ _ i
Mil 1 AA; TIN -.•• ! `ll. x •I• 2i) r �1TS 1� J7 I�I
BIS�lI Ga. ¢! S.p s ,I i e/ars- --liall .131M III gr.
4."-NIMMICI la.it-- 4 •Ille- `40r14 IMAM
o It Lla34uptiki
I.
A1111"1. a VW II
, •IFIll ii allIMIIIIII0 Ient.IFI / 1
L ISIIN ,.....,_ .,, .. „,. "Ill, '1-"-.. : Ill
r givii .ig-thm, _ jj$)
I •
• IIf:
___ )7
A. RO5EDALE �'' I':•Q4.'�• ' al•r !
. ... MI
Ior •�� C� r . ..R%Pd CITY sAP i �AIS gi4 •r 3•
.
, _ 1,.. :7 . 6 • • KERSErPOP 174 . •
111P ' ' . IlliWal
2• 1enil
.� _• �
Ay
a • C I' gri '!!SF4J!S!S '
sin • • I • •• •
• ;:_ ::
1 y I— i ' • i• I
• • , •� � - - �•!- x•! 1 1,•• • il ...P. 4 err . • I %N...
• •• • • I 31 �, • 33 I: ill1 35 • 34 �•r 1 11 >Z !
•� ---
S'�►'1/ ' ' • `• '..° • NOTt 11 I• O� �' ■ • , /First • • 1 1•,.• I I.L/ N.. ! NARDIN I'`/`•
• r•' &/j ' � • • • • ■ flor.� •
le - • - - •- - - - - - - •o • ;eo off . �! - - �. - _� :, �• , .
,e •:-•Poptr iLE • •lie • e `•
` a - • �yJ; - . r ._
n - I!> ;r! r 1• I L ..I
3 . 1,...-
•Si • i �
llik
: 4 -- - — - - -- - -
PI
•
\ "ow
j'
AEI It • ,. i/ l
Vie. ..•� .rrr Nj____ /.j•
c..,.• • as
— =..•
_�-- _ �_ 49/7! l
•••• • °• ° x928 l+'J (<a ;;( - :_:__
I'h1 lb
• n • ei
ern
Or
k.
1111 • _ I —"?O� `i / \\\)
•a _ wO'O
•
Clark Y�+
a : \-.,
Lake• 18 9313 4909V‘411,t•
•
\ ONic
v
•4 \
• oWel '
•
d .a j •
r rm rn r•l'�sia i` ,: ,,, ,It 4893 ---N\
!4 9 ` 488
EtM /1`x/1 . •° \ \0
• a 11 4
ri)::\\
u•
100,11.1;; .,. \f
III
/ o
/ allr a m
4872 ,
•
i
•° •
\ / 77 1
- 2 a
2
Lx .. . J
o �.
\isN ) 1-1--4.9°Q :
\ , TIC. /• 4839 •
4863 ° •
\ k ___,c),. ,.. 4B6c 4913 �C8\\\) . 8
I'acllnrd / . Ill Es M Resc►-t o r _ ____
N.
�J1
0 iL 1-•
h
.-v..\ .11/ .
\ O
Pr-----) (
____
0 Golf C rse•
/ -- \ c •
_ 2 4835
1 I • • \ k. LTh f .)°d
1/
•
ft
.0 Il
1 \ 1
0 + ------------"---%--%\.
(�
M // \\... .�
1 48 9 it 1
n
_e__S \R-j.. i,
4856 .. Ors •. .
•
4873f-
. ° (7-
ii °° o ';• 462/
,1 • 1 11 I n
11 °
• d
°" II
• 1 '. \ II
st re IS C.\\,,
•
�yo . _: \ \ +1.� ;;
I
/ .. • L_ •
°
d
.� . Eato a I —� ESS es
G II
STERN 6 �I' •� . •.• Ii�1��•.. • _ 4846 2
' � C : . • l 480
•
/ oil I - or i• le s • ,
ie V,..• . 1
I Waste• _ 1 Pit
1 -- I -......._,J.L\
\ .0
eso
I 0 i
High Sch I it
• 1\ (
•` l '� - . f
,'N • � �' \ ,' : . L ''. i
_. - ,ate..•-v,c-•
---
.. .H: . ri A a a I l� • i
...art= . — I -- -
II 1 p):11 . ..�; iii �r44440 , .
.. .. . . ., .. . v. . .
.r . , . . .
..._ . . _,• • �,
Y .yp
1h4 i
^� 1
._ � tsr e ` � Lam .0 * A
( Sa w
,•' - _rte J ! J • \ , ',/.
r--,-...wsarz=raogPlk . 2, l . .. ,, . 11 C ... _"1 .,..•
W.` ler... ,`city
N.
is
•
' � iL _ ..::L.s"'_ 'ti-til •:46 .1. , 11 ;Viirk 4 4 .
1 \
/ i i \-
ti
•
; Ak
) _ \ is
w
,
i-
\ .
. 1 / f
•
r et • Z - • -
). • -
1' ; • 1
•
t •
, -
•
Itir,I ,
•
.. NUJ'./ # .-.4 �- ' •t •
y.
4.' _ _ - _ - l - -.
- r \1
\ .. . .
•
•
•
. .• . de -41-ilsik
r i : IM
i
_ \
•
t —
'\ . -
. , ,.
, .. . ,,
. , j � '�1 ,, . . ,...,,,,,. .
..*,,
. .,
. X11 "— lraO" et s.w e�� _��_. - '_T
;1:* t �. �
• _ .� I '' .:.r , -. a...11%4
^ �, '. It .l :• ,�11F, '_.C,,: . 1. �._ .
a.
T
■
•
• :f •�i�'�`f.� Al
t- .t . ''' . s.1 ` ( r.6.
;,.4
,, • I . ',f ,,. • i . ,,
`� ■ �'Y i f- •
..- 1111 1 'fit f 1 I �1
v x
Cn
v (N.
It
S? '
N) irrl
W I v
art
;.N N co
re" N W
•- (t. \ N
Cr.: , _
O •
61
st
411 W
19
Wilk
NLI
..viiiii _. .
•
W
1
roa
..,__sa ,
/' ) N
..
N.). . A. 't.
a N ..
(i , ,4-,,,,_ 4i- • . -
01 W
/ .t..1. N
CFI
I co
• \` ' a i►
H '' - pa
ti
. i SI W
it i W N
Z;
•
\\S. . ' ' •
s.
4 N
.
ID A
PO4:
Ugi
•
A t1
'� . .:
` }� i.
.. rte.. • �^ '� -* 1.,•� - •li 4•••4.
N ke.
u
ii JI
' . • % N a
.*t ` O
N 5+'
I .
....,
,...
co
41144.e I
A + Ugl
iii
0
P.
..........XTT:
1
I
•
ri
sim 0 fsais N , -r , A•
.r ks N
N
,
r 0o I s. s` v
CO
Mkth
l yr dl. Y- .a I 1
} •I, '
1. ^.n 'l •r.1. T' ) .J . - . iiilll
f ,
. � { I
J t N 1 '1 ' e.
404 4'���,-�-���""'��'`�YC 1 Yt
a
_.? _ ..
//-1r Oa
Nei
1` P N N /
I
` ' J r1 CK. • y' Y /Jr' A4 •
V.:
at t /
1/4.0 43I
' • ' 1. - . .----C-...\...?.... _
• j �' N �.� `� ..tee` t 1� :,- 11�••-.
M 'a + r _r1t� y�NV '
W •
00
1 ,
CP Are
Y 1 i / 1 • / • r
1.. 1J .A
I le
•
DI
0 C • G tn i.
1,
la Ihr
,,
.6.1, ,..,.. . t
1/4„. .„ ,fr r .1 , , ,
511 sic t
ll I • '
41
.41.1 y . l ` �a\J•a
•
I .
7 CORDED `�'' EX�'MPTION No. ®� � -17-2- RE 968 ,gym_
Found PK nail . 0
Northwest Corner.' S.53°47'16'; E. F'
Section 17 et opd . A�26 5920 _ Ch.: 195.38 w
Delta: 24°41 26
i \0 �o� h 5Z Arc: 196.90' Nj
. �.. . Go t, 6• ig" p3 Rod.: 456.91' k n
131Cie , A9 h S. A69 •• N
'0 C.
0 ; \9 g9 MZ 03
la �' g2. `g A02 . C. J
5. 6 0 co
66 to 5• ya A3 : H 0
t� m q, 20 2 S. 56°45'96"E. ' z\
in n \ C y 6 Ch: 161.1a SCALE: In= 800 r co
25 O • Delta: 11°18'52" 250250 500 f t1
Arc: . 161.40' ' � 1 ' ' xr
S.88°22'21"W 2114.00' Rod.: 817.31' 1000 RI ..
0
I Set PK nail ' P I-1
MO ...,, te5 o
• �6 nQ North Lire of Southeast!/4 W va
30' SO. -?30' o
tri O
' n .• Gte5 a16 o\.
P 55 n o
o, 'i 32 �?9' O w
# . 3�8 o OA 6 E, 32A�p •
5.O a�62 •E. I ,
U
� ;.,: ;.-. ,�w. . 5.23 ,21-r 62�g1 v
�0'� 5.45 `a, • #
a5o p8 U
• N.01°35'15"W, S.
843.70' •
•
' 79897'
•
N.90vdod . 30'
Found PK nail Found 3/4" WCR # 80
— Southwest Corner 16. pipe r_.. .
Section 17 .,l,R,,..;, 0. S 1/4 Corner
° .
Section 17,;
--`H •—:z `',. -� s: �,,9, �__- OWNERS:. . .
h
�''''' r� I N DOUBLE ,EIGHT ` LAND
', t i : ; CORPORATION
"4“. 1":-.1% Omaha National-'‘,Bank
Z ..h � I •
°l' •: CIO Omaha 'National Bank
ii. i �,� :: 17th a Farnam , .
-Ail <Oj' Omaha,. N9braska 68102
4 .t �. . ,
!.869 11; 4861 . .1,
•G
... • la.' .'.', . •
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: I" = 2000' •
PROJECT NO.: 1986-116 DATE: NOVEMBER, 1986
Jones-Wininger & Associates:i Greeley, Colorado 8063O •
Professional Surveyors •i.(;:.: 217 13th Street 303-351-4700
__ __. _ SHFFT 1 nF 3 •
Lj)` ��
DEPAR-7 NT OF PLANNING SERVICES
is
cat � " PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
915 STREET= GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
`\ s$
in
git
_'r c f4 w'- � -
COLORADO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on May 5,
1987, at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of an amendment to a
Special Review Permit increasing the capacity of a Livestock Confinment
Operation from Double Eight Land Corporation. The parcel of land is
described as part of the NW} of Section 17, T7N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado, containing 30.82 acres, more or less. The property is
located approximately 1.5 miles east of-Ault, south of Weld County Road 82,
east of Weld County Road 39, and 'approximately . 1.5 miles north of Eaton.
The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the
consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld
County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial
Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related
to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County
Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Room 342, Greeley,
Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing
on May 5, 1987. -
Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the
Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center,
915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado, - Phone - 356-4000, Extension 4400.
Jack Holman, Chairman
Weld County Planning Commission
To be published in the Johnstown Breeze
To be publish one (1) time by April 9, 1987
Received by: JJJ
Date: /�/ ]
J _
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the
surrounding property owners in the case #Amended USR-199:73:14 for Double
Eight Land Corporation in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class
Mail, and addressed as per attached list.
This 30th day of March, 1987.
2
/ r
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
/
I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN
(10) DAYS PRECEDING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASE
arv1 u5Q 99•:73:iq. THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY:
-s.19- vn.\,a-\-edl S -87 RockkvLED CA
NAME OF` PERSON POSTING SIGN (�
�oJro e .\1�t e C0V' [D bX
SIGNAT OF A PLICANT
STATE OF COLORADO )
)
COUNTY OF WELD )
- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ),...2 4� DAY OF
19�: I
rN,,v;•-c OTARY PUBLIC
P
'
` My Commission Expires
l'IY'(OISSIOIS (gfIRES April 9,1991
LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: -�72en 19R7
( MAv121987 .
r l r.�
yield Co. Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN PROVIDED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN
(10) DAYS PRECEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING FOR CASE
052 194% 73: 11 . THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY:
•
nliJ
NAME OF
WaON POSTING
C
SIGNA APPLICANT
STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF WELD )
SUBSCRIBED AND_ SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /y - DAY OF
19 p
tiptZ ?\-Vt• (\V/U//�C�I/�Q i (y Q�jf
a NOTARY PUBLIC
b'1"-\_.\ My Commission Expires
MYY,COMMMISION:ERPRES April 9,1991
LAST DAY TO POST SIGN IS: 4 -'4 19 8 7
•
MAY 121987
Weld Co. Planning Commississ
• - DEPART'c---'V G-1 OF PLANNING SERVICES .
• l1 ,
• . , c , PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400
915 10th STREET
_ - a , GREELEY COLORADO 80631
i
COLORADO .-.
March 30, 1987 - . - -
TO: :.SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS - '
- . - Case Number:. Amended USR-199:73:14
There will be. a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on
Tuesday,- May 5,:_1987, at- 1:30_ p.m. -in the County, Commissioners' .Hearing .
Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center,::915 10th-Street,-Greeley,
Colorado- concerning the request of: - - -
.NAME: - Double`Ei ht Land_Corp oration. _ " ' _
g
FOR: Amended User-by Special Review = -. -
'LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the .NWi of Section- 17, T_ 7N, R65W of- .the 6th -
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
- . . LOCATION:. Approximately 1.,5 miles east of Ault, -south of Weld -County Road' -_
82, East of -Weld County Road 39, and approximately-1.5 miles north .- - --
of Eaton.- - - - -
Your property is within five-hundred (500) feet of the property"_on which
"-' this request. has been made. For additional information write or telephone :.
Lanell J. Swanson, Current Planner._ •
_ - '
- - - - WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES -' _ - - -- - _
915 10th Street`-Room 342 - -
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone: 356-4000 - Extension 4400 - - t
March 24•, 1987
Weld County Department of
Planning Services
915 10th St.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Proposed amendment of USR Permit #199
Dear Sirs:
Double Eight Land Corporation of 39644 Weld County Rd. 39, Ault, CO
requests an amended permit to update the feedlot operation located at the
above address.
The proposed use of the property would be a continuation of a cattle
feedlot operation, with the exception of an increased capacity from 2100
head to 3000 head. There is a total of 15 feedlot pens existing on 10.58
acres. 3690 linear feet of concrete feedbunk with apron and headrail is
also part of the improvements.
Double 8 is requesting an amended permit to allow an increased legal
capacity of the. feedlot. Supporting data proves that 3000 head of cattle can
easily be fed with the existing improvements. The amended permit would
allow this feedlot to operate at it's utmost: efficiency.
Adjacent property owners listed on permit application are involved
in three types of agriculture activities. These uses are row-crop farming,
sheep feeding, and cattle feeding. The location and ownership of residential
structures within a mile of the property is shown on the attached map.
The number of employees would be approximately two full-time individuals
with occasional part-time help.
The source of water will continue to be a 3/4" tap serviced by North
Weld County Water District. See attached letter of certification,
Access to the feedlot is available by Colorado State Highway 14 and
Weld County Road 39, which is paved.
Vehicular traffic will continue to exist as it has previously with
the normal activity of the feedlot. This involves the use of a feed mixer
truck and occasional grain and livestock deliveries by semi-truck.
Sewage favilities existing on the property are septic systems approved
by Weld County Health Department. An evaluation was made on December 18,
1986. Please see attached letter.
• l
Page two
The property is located in the Ault Fire- Protection District with
support available from the Eaton and Pierce Volunteer Fire Departments.
3000 head of yearling cattle or calves would be the number of cattle
to be concentrated on the property at one time.
An 80 by 200' silage bunker exists for silage storage. Approximately 10 plus
additional acres are available for feed storage and equipment.
A storm water retention facility and animal waste system does exist
and is approved by Weld County Health Department. Please see attached letter.
Disposal-of dead-animal carcasses_is_contracted by rendering. dompániea
located in Greeley. Manure is hauled and spread on neighboring farms for
fertilizer. Local trash services provide an on site dumpster with regular
removal schedules.
Mature landscaping exists and is well maintained. Erosion control -
measures have and will be practiced. Should this property cease to be used
as a feedlot, reclamation plans are to return the area to pasture.
Since this is an existing operation no construction or start-up dates
are applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR APPLICATION:
The existing feedlot was and will remain consisted with the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan in an agricultural zone district.
A feedlot operating in this area is compatable since the district
contains -several other sheep and cattle feeding operations. The location
of the feedlot was chosen based on the lack of productivity as farmground.
The feedlot concerned has operated for the past 15 years with no
negative impact on the health, safety, and welfare of its neighbors.
Surrounding land is used for row crop farming, cattle and sheep
feeding. Owners and operators are shown on attached map.
The feedlot being located in an agriculturaly zoned area, and being
surrounded by cattle and sheep feeders as well as farming operations proves
that it is and will be compatible with future development.
The area involved is zoned agricultural and is not located in a flood
plain, geologic hazard or airport overlay district and complies with Section
Fifty overlay district regulations as outlined in the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
Attached is a letter from North Weld County Water District showing
quantity, quality and dependability of the water source.
r
Page three
A copy of the recorded exemption plat showing ownership is attached.
Also, a copy of USDA Soil Survey is attached.
Since the property is rural and zoned. agriculture a noise report
is not provided.
NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET
Please print or type
•
NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION 11
Frank C. & Lois E. Booth Box 386, Ault, CO 80610 1.
I. R. Booth & Son, Inc. P. 0. Box 386, Eaton, CO 80615 2.
I. R. Booth & Sons, Inc. P. 0. Box 386, Eaton, CO 80615 3.
I. R. Booth & Sons, Inc. P. O. Box 386, Eaton, CO 80615 4.
BROWN, William James, Jr. & Marcelyn M.
& BROWN, Nancy Lou 17960 WCR 74, Eaton, CO 80615 5 & 6
Harold M. Deane 1849 Michael Lane, Ft. Collins, Co 80526 7
J. Gale & Valerie A. Moody P. 0. Box 9078, Ft. Collins, CO 80525 8
Spencer Feedlots, Inc. Rt. 1, Box 153, Ault, CO 80610 9
Roland Mapelli Rt. 2, Box 206A, Eaton, CO 80615 10
* Please see attached plat
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Double Eight Land Corporation
Amended USR-199:73:14
Frank C. and Lois E. Booth
Box 386
Ault, CO 80610
I.R. Booth and Son, Incorporated
P.O. Box 386
Eaton, CO 80615
William James, Jr. , and Marcelyn M. Brown
Nancy Lou Brown
17960 Weld County Road 74
Eaton, CO 80615
Harold M. Deane
1849 Michael Lane
Fort Collins, CO 80526
J. Gale and Valerie A. Moody
P.O. Box 9078
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Spencer Feedlots, Incorporated
Route 1, Box 153
Ault, CO 80610
Roland Mapelli
Route 2, Box 206A
Eaton, CO 80615
,. ' P
•
BOdRD OF DIRECTORS � • "1` �
' ERNESTT10GE9 ` NORTH MELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
ALEX HEIDENREICH ,M°` 4SFg, r` _ .,
ROBERT ALKIRE T� lM•", gill
GARY SIMPSON , cigiNil j; HIGHWAY 85 •LUCERNE,COLORADO 80848 •
W.M.McKAY •
,itiT„�µY LYLE NELSON,MGR.
±:' „ P.O. BOX 56 • PHONE 356.•3020
•
December 1 , 1.986 .'.
RE: Water Service - Double Eight Land Corporation
Dear Sirs,
This letter is in response to your inquiry rogardingwater s'er.v:i:ce,,;.:
to .the following described property :
NWl Sec 17.7-65 Meter # 67
a..
1 . X Water service is presently being p,tvvYile4 tti tlte tl }y
• • described property.
2 • X Water service can be made available to the above„ .,.„;rj;.,`j •;,'+'.
described property provided all requr•romen'4s: `o;G t ::
District are satisfied ;
If contracts have not bee-h. consumated with North. Wild :County t9 L{e i..
• District within one year from date of this letter , Lh,i:s Ile t':t i ,er S:hswjj. `,become null and void .
Additional comments :
•
Sincerely,
a::::,‘: if
NORTH WELD �COUNTY WATER D-7STRTCT' sr
ti
Lyle Nelson , Manager
LDN/wb j
i-.
1,,. r ' :
'.:f�Yn
.lt9 4.
' .I'.c
UNITED STATES Soil 4302 W. 9th St. Rd.
DEPARTMENT OF Conservation Greeley, CO 80634
AGRICULTURE Service (303)356--6506
•
April 23, 1987
Board of Supervisors
West Greeley ylI�� Soil Conservation District
Bo
x cix 86
Greeley, CO 80632
Weld County Case Number: Amended USR-199:73: 14
bent I ernen:
I have reviewed the application from Double Eight Land Corporation for an
..,:mended Use by Special Review permit to increase their cattle feedlot from
2100 head to 3000 head in part of the NW 1/4 of Section 17, T7N, R65W.
Ibis location is approximately 1 .5 Miles east of Ault , south of Weld County
Road 82, east of Weld County Road 39, and 1 .5 miles north of Eaton.
The following are the four areas of concern that I have :
1 . The flow into the retention pond should be routed through a pipe drop
+.i:r iicture rather than rising over the wall flow with rip-rap. With a
continual flow situation , rip-rap will unravel and not provide the
n'•cessary stabi l ity required.
2. . Storage vo I urnn was computed using 100% runoff from 16.9 ac . with a
10 yr./24 hr . storm frequency of 2.8" when in actually it should have been
calculated using' 25 yr./24 hr. frequency of 3.2" with 95% runoff which
provides less required storage than actually calculated.
Pit volurnn calculation isn ' t accurate as the volurnn wasn ' t calculated
using the following formula:
V = d E (Top W x Top L) + (Sot W x Sot L) + 4(Middle W x Middle L) J=ac . ft .
6 C • 43,560
No allowance was given for sediment which should account for a
allowance. Required pit volurnn = :37:3 ac . ft. + 25% sediment volumn =
4.66 ac . ft. total retention vo l urnn .
Design pit volurnn = 4.4.4 ac . ft .
Channel volurnn = 0.30 ac . ft . •
Total design voiumn = 4. 34 ac . ft. or 104% of required
Even though calculations were incorrect, design size is adequate to
ccornpl ish job.
33: Retention pond spillway design isn ' t adequate , release extra storm
_ PFows in excess of 25 yr . /24 hr . storms . A pipe outlet should be set with
top of pipe at 79. 1 ft . elevation to provide the proper 2 ft . freeboard and
nr.cessary relief of pit .
4. Design doesn ' t indicate where s1_p i l I way discharge is to be disposed of .
ft only indicates being dischared outside of review area. Duo the
applicants have the rights to discharge as design indicates?
[ would r=ec omrnend a copy of this letter be submitted for Planning Cornrn i s i on
approval .
Sincerely,
Ronald D. Mill er-
1_) i r i ct Conservationist
SGS Greeley Field , Ctffice
kl.)M/kep
( . .u,' �" :
'aiAi4SIFT "4t_ ridiattonmaritingpsjs, Phis is a
noderatel4 deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations
If.4;900 to 5,250 feet. It formed in resit, , from shale.
.ncluded in mapping are small areas o±__is that have
;hale and sandstone deeper than 40 inches.
Typically the surface layer is brown loam about 8
aches thick. The underlying material is pale brown and
•ery pale brown loam. Shale is at a depth of about 28
fiches.
Permeability and available water capacity are
aoderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches.
urface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low.
This soil is suited to limited cropping. A suitable
copping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa followed by 2
ears of corn and small grain and alfalfa seeded with a
urse crop. Incorporating plant residue and manure im-
roves tilth and provides organic matter and plant
utrients.
Most irrigation methods are suitable, but the length of
ins should be short to prevent overinigation. Light,
-equent irrigations are best. Sprinkler irrigation is
osirable. Commercial fertilizers increase yields and add
the value of the forage produced.
In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, _
arley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to -al3-Soils having a slow infiltration rate when•
inter wheat. The predicted average yield is 25 bushels thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils that have a •
or acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is soils that have moderately fine texture or fine texture.
io low for beneficial use of fertilizer. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Stubble mulch fanning, striperopping, and minimum til- -itlf:roupTP Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high -
age are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist
erracing also may be needed to control water erosion. chiefly of clay soils that have a high shrink-swell poten-
The potential native vegetation is dominated by blue tial, soils that have a permanent high water table, soils
rama. Several mid grasses, such as western wheatgrass that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface,
nd needleandthread, are also present. Potential produc- and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious materi-
on ranges from 1,600 pounds per acre in favorable years al. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmis- -
1,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condition sion.
ele•iorates, the mid grasses decrease; blue grama, buf-
dograss, snakeweed, yucca, and fringed sage increase;
ad forage production drops. Undesirable weeds and an-
❑ads invade the site as range condition becomes poorer.
Management of vegetation on this soil should be based
a taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc-
on. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. •
ideoats grama, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue
rama, pubescent wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are
citable for seeding. The grass selected should meet the •
,asonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded into '
clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a •
czn prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring has •
tven most successful.
Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally
)t suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to
:termine if plantings are feasible.
Rangeland wildlife, such as antelope, cottontail, and
vote, are best suited to this soil. Because forage produc-
m is typically low, grazing management is needed if
'estock and wildlife share the range. Livestock watering
cilities also are utilized by various wildlife species. The
-opland areas provide favorable habitat for pheasant and
owning dove. Many nongame species can be attracted
establishing areas for nesting and escape cover.
Me underlying shale is the most limiting feature of
s soil. Neither septic tank absorption fields nor sewage
oons function properly. In places the underlying shale
high shrink-swell potential. Environmental and beau-
-cation plantings of trees and shrubs can be difficult to
.ablish. Capability subclass IVs irrigated; IVe nonir-
ated; Loamy Plains range site.
f
i% c .00217
•SENDER:Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired,and complete items 3 and 4.
z0 Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
r-I card from being returned to you:The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person
i H6 delivered to and the date of.delivery.For additional fees the following services are available.Consult
m- Q
a rn postmaster for fees and check boxles)for additional service(s)requested.
Er g o ,0 Q q 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery.
ml O o J r4. 3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article Number fi}
ru LL , I JOHN R. -SUNDIN ' ' r•
0 H w z E q Type of Service:
o W 8 z ? _z.o , DOUBLE EIGHT LAND CORPORATION
g z a o 39644 'WELD COUNTY ROAD 39 ❑ Istered ❑ Insured
U 8 w Q,. H ,.O mp Certified ❑ COD
✓q ¢<s a zca x..o co- AULT, ..CO 80610 - Express Mall
Ri OLL g LL$.. p'O.Fa ` { , Always obtain signature of addressee.or
' 41'co H W o - agent and DATE DELIVERED.
a a4 3 y • . 5.Signature—Addressee 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
• 0 cd a-t; v x requested and fee paid)
• w Z PO 7 H.
¢ 0 0 MN.. 3 d 6.Signatuure/� Agent
H.Fa M. '6.,.: I " x Ta,(M,,,!'
- _ _..'S'n< 7.Date of Delivery
4727 / 2
PS Form 3811,Feb.1 86 //e /d1 , '(-?epte
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
' - upbtNutH:complete items 1 and 22wwhen additional services are desired,and complete items 3,end 4. `
Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person
x delivered to and the date of delivery.For additional fees the folloWing services are available.Consult
H postmaster for fees and check boxles)for additional service(s) requested.
Uri 2 o 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery.
�+t7 W o_, PO _ 3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article laumber
s �)
< m W
11.1 o cc 2 co- o FRANK C. -& LOIS E. BOOTH• Type of Service:
gr v ¢ oHi' PO BOX ,386' . ❑ egistered 0 Insured
p ¢ �= m . CO d AULT, CO- •
.Certified ❑ COD.
A
o �= h w o a 80610 P
LL o • Express Mall
m . 8 • M O" t r. Always obtain signature of addressee or
a o U % U, a - - ` agent and DATE DELIVERED.
0. Uz ;OW H v -i 5.Signature—Addressee 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
¢ ,0 c a) X requested-and fee paid) _ `
Ps.:`P.4 cg` U `5' 6.Si ur —Agent
YilCIJOV30e 1 U CI V S'fl x ' yer
' rfi 7.Date of Delivery ` '�
' •SENDER:Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired,and complete items 3 and 4. 1
Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on the reverse side.Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide.you the nameof the person
delivered to and the date of delivery.For additional fees the following services are evellable.Consult
Q ci postmaster for fees end cheek bbxWs)for additional service(s)requested.
.A oa Hi r 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery.
¢' w - . 4.Article Number
IW
o I. R. BOOTH & SONS, INC.•
o PO BOX .386', 0�6/�
m a'E 2 0 0 en 0 i Always obtain signature of addressee or
is
—e W ,0 agent and_DATE DELIVERED.
[1 W a, pa H 5.Signature—Addressee 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
¢ . 0 6 X requested and fee paid)
H-P+ W 6.S' a —Agent
• _x 0._,_,...„ � ,,
7.Date of Delivery��
may/ 2
II PS Form 3811,Fe . ^- ` �Z DOMESTIC RETURN,RECEIPT
J.
3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article-Number
a n
N
o y WILLIAM JAMES BROWN, JR': Type of Service:
o ,NARCELYN M[ BROWN
In ❑ gicleied 9 Insured
ui o r4 . NANCY LOU. BROWN t , Certified COD
Fld U¢o¢
O r ': g`z '17960 WELD COUNTY ROAD 74 Express Mau
¢ wg.- m p+ 3 H vi _ •
D°• W,cd y 3 80615 • Always obtain signature of addressee or
m�� 3 EATON, C ,
5.Signature—Add agent DATE DELIVERED.
o ¢0= m ;,FgMo
rS 0 g s i Z rn L7 Addressee u 00 A Addressee's Address(ONLY if
m is.=o ` • O _ requested and fee paid)
l— z H z':0.W 0 X }
D. a o �' ,a 3 0 6.Signature—Agent
z v x 870394
w :ra.0ozso
¢ . Fa-i. C �' d U 7.Date of DV
r
.z z —I td `l71' p I
'<' i Vi - PS Form 3811,Fab.1986�'6_ /�/ DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT i
i , r
1
.
ji •SENDER:Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired,and complete.items 3 and 4.
Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
Q card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the persoq
ca " . N delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fees the folloWing services ere available.Consult
r O Lei,
J
W o .o postmaster for fees and check boxes)for additional services) requested.
in g tb 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery.
0 H . --
al zw o 3 ide Addressed to: 4.Article Number
ti v a HAROLD M.=5DEANE Type of Service:
tie
as o ,o � az. . '
1849 MICHAEL LANE ❑ istered ❑ Insured'
Pt LL =" it
u. Certified ❑ COD
H K 2 Z'U a ' d , FORT COLLINS, CO,. 80526 T7 Express Mail
CL W = A U u_ 0 _ Always obtain signature of addressee or
.. W O CV H d A agent and DATE DELIVERED.
- co.o v a 5.Signature ddre 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
x -+.: W w X /, /,pJr requested and fee paid)
--- --- ---�C° 6.Signature—A ant '6
X
7.Date of Delivery
ADO inn
, ` PS Form'ikal,Pitt P986r //J 44e Z/ DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
rut your aoaress In toe"rst I mum ii i space an we reverse me.I-enure to ao ems tom prevent tnIs
A ; card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the pergop
D' Q o i delivered to and the date of deliver'.For additional fees the olloWing services are availab e.Consult
u` g a Z N postmaster for fees and check box(es)for additional service(s)requested.
C00., in 0 Show to whom delivered,date,and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery. '
W>< o
•
ti] LL EP. 6 a), 3.Article Addressed to: 4.AArrttiic(e,Number
o r. (;_` h w '7007 tJ97
Er 0
CC i Hy - J. GALE & VALERIE A. MOODY Type of Service:
ci vw w IParBOX 9078 • t.
N Mid? y '�. rn" ' v ❑ egistered 9 Insured
m O,s ro > rozfr+ co FO$T' COLLINS e CO 80525`' Certified COD
=o d I Express Mall
a -
W == w o LL Always obtain signature of addressee or
W U a - - agent and DATE DELIVERED. _
( 111
W opa H ,aI c u , ign —Addressee C, 8.Addressee's Address(ONLY if
• o o , ca X requested and fee pard)
—‘ F-) w w - lk
6 .. ' . 'Ns 7 6 tgnature— gent
"
7171
r7
• 7.Date f Oahu.= _ i •
, .1PS Form 3811,Feb.1986 ( /N9 _ �//t . DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
n DIY urrw
card from being returned to you.-The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person
delivered to end the date of delivey.Pdr additional fees the folloWing services are&affable.Consult
Q postmaster for fees and check boxes)for additional service(s) requested.
o * o 1. 0 Show to whom delivered,date,end addressee's address. 2. O Restricted Delivery.
CIO o_. 0 > 3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article Number
W a Z
LL,..0_ H
90 ®a
o re g o `i rn r^ SPENCER FEEDLOTS, INC.'°"`j Type of Service:
U R W tC o CI ROUTE,%Jai. BOX 153 F... i,'.r egistered 0 Insured
P rc _E % A X o AULT, CO " 80610 Certified ❑ COD
,-R
O g IL g, to W oo oo Express Mail
I-0. = W c.o a Always obtain signature of addressee or
d W= a, H U, I i 3 - - agent and DATE DELIVERED.
__ f w U w '„ v _4 5.Sig tore-Addressee 8.Addressee's Address ONLY if
'z H F // requested and fee paid) j-
� od 6.Signature-I/Agent
m4 X
7.Date of Delivery
z.-71PS Form 3811, eb.198 e DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
/�
I. u snow to venom uouvereu,unto,MICA numeaaaa a evuraaa. a. u nom naval,vm, a,y. -,
—
3.Article Addressed to: 4.Article Number
• a
I 9:00?-6o
o —
ROLAND MAPELLI ''' Type of Service:
o w ROUTE ,?; BOX 206ARegislered Insured
—0 it E.!.a -, d EATON„"CO 8061'5 6F J7 Certified 9 COD
f. ;_ 1/40 in Express Mall
p u. >i 2 H oN `43 - - Always obtain signature of addressee or
a- () BEE, o -p o agent and DATE DELIVERED.
® OE LL EC a t woo _
a 5.&o2u1r& J
a—Adsee El.Addressee's Address(ONLY If ,
N p IL X reuesteand feeard)
- d6. 870
394
it o o H o d 7.Date of De v
x rxw ,
' u-- - 7
' •SR* a PS Form 3811,Feb.1986 ifJr6 yew DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT !f
r _ /If/ Cv 1
Hello