The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About891002.tiff IFIRCI ••=="°a• 1-25 SUBDIVISION P.U.D. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAT ;I.AMENDMENT I "•". III III -_--_— u� hi_ v sanr[W.o4.134 10E L x.®,i.. I \ :41..a...0 C...u:rxr:moir. .r ____z_____Ig ig :Illi . li—S1 Y ...m rr,rmo a.meo \ ii'I --., t:y li .rte �. ^\ M., .....,......0„,...2,..., v _ - ev51]r. 13.1 a%amp.00 i `1 m K I%nit ram Art.. CM Mee Mina v+we ui.s,o. ▪ C^. —•„:,=.:1„ _▪ —n1°" nm w Campo.m mae"..awn memn0e n mw,mw at MOM.410,40 nmwwwvawm.ym�.�[wraw a,•wr. 554 r n,rrw..ua ter. r nro g .v[m rearm.ern inmvr'gev —nt'L� a ▪ vu a v. 00 w�wm..awuu mama/¢ti amvu n weeta .--_.�... roa =3:2.."" Sa•• .w�-°—,, s • nw.rta [..a ur Vwrol xn -- •0T0mg /O V 1/4 rom 41,04 m mem" 'xrat nb., M 1 11O4mm em scum 350 Met OMP atty��run{'v..-,.z,`"i o ........Vwui t✓ - •mwm�mmortiuPMMm1410 Me fu Ma am Mm.0 eemna rt¢un r,& —G�u ..s`ee u� _-__ LIME OESGMP.NHoY4_PWL,ton m a n _ , �-,� x°.n arm c rp�w w m.m we u ,rye Swrun n. R CM /�{� . —_y_::—; . ..ma w rwam r nse,..m sump MC ruro MM.• °a'..0 sin.a uu°a .Pat-an,"°""'°".wr"".`a•e; D q,\ ...........n.................eam.non w mw.m. • •VjJ ~�u9~ rwr..rew.m.ewr varee...r.c rw:.a.ruer. 5"201°wW.maaa ro •° qua 4.,ro.anl 404 xeerac�vwo wrw. a .e ..J,�.."w Semen 4 a distance i,;x°W?I°r.,rive�ra.00 oo "- 'I— N er,';f r iar:rm.e.Pi enea.r •"'Z — 4 49 B el 2414 r . v .0 w1 m : r r/0/ MM.re 0000-sm �,rf .w.u ..,,;,.arw rmw. �.° DC le meNldnb el,u.eoem el 1274.04 Moe mover MCC �'n 590 i.I°Ie'.en n ma .o- aeems-'2 0343130.E i e.w Stance al 150.50 03E-0 A •Ma feFEBLI,0. I ',Ter-Milian �ampi am,am SC `p1M 7 t JtY ,m •i J. tae+{• `� '•A''t'. t". idi tY- l g. rYv 3• l t r. - f as '• .ra11s FLl�-d'x ''-t r .:.•01:427.'''317,1 ��y '} . . •^p vr; DUE put y"�. .t•x.a..,,. 5 Y. r. -,:Yd' .man,., F-a+r°Lr.. -' ii.,' }„ i:-: .0,-, Dtr � } .e �� .n,r 4 �` Y?*i-,'5,�v€Jd�r��^t4�}'i`2Sa � L t� �f�? .,hr•)• 1.'S-.��„t�..��Y:?•rr y .c.�. .. •j,�r,F. ,} .,q..l t �� gl � 4 . 12 •tan:se 0121/413 oDnPne Ilan .10.00 DYpOI '• - !'.: ty .' . .1.,44 ;: r- ly,_ .,1• -'''.1,,t .' ..,e,li;9„+T" .I*.c " ."4?.,a-" 't`'•?.l. x 1', ,r ,..-'k .rt7 •tg-... .+. t'w .yF. Nff13a0 r 00H WY AY Du6ERs0 CiYt a m00rDu MUD m.CO .•• - :'�,> i �.rd 1 `,� R t t,; ,s ✓ r ••E'S`A. ��y}.ALA a'[`i./7J FT�f:� 1 r4•� .('. 'vY`'' v1j yiy.;,a • . {Y, "rim '; +�• s a w A- •'Ina' -i a-t.,.f,:,,,- ` •• VICINITY' \I A , t r :-..3�,r'F .507',4,2.SAY 1 Y 1�Q. `,tat e„mtms -^A ,•,.. f,Y mama_s -,� r:.�2l?.w..',ar.1Mt_b "S r f I_ 4oTa7,Ge..al • _ 1. The Spni.t Marina permit is for opal-pit min ins and iP. tit ematavoi]en the •--tOre-anca7,33 ` "r • :.41!!:1 processing •{D and emerntn nil•eph.lt bent 11144 as u..re.vu.mnit of the snooty Cooney be!O acwtaar..1N .!, D•pertvet of 'Inning loco E�errle•arial. on 4.1..t 50 to the Solidi..code anion.far c'S' Dns.iopa•nt Etaheads tad heroin. R. as ]da TOe provost] cant or opreeor •Tall e. .21.5 • for o li CCST v�ta tie Beside Staniar.of!nation 24,1 of end '. 1. Too earn-cut erevel op...clot Nail.amply.1N section 4r,4, tale coney W1ny Ordinance. •� anoreticn Pollute.. any violation of then.regulation shall 21. She - Ir• be droved.ter.ntere•unt of Section 44.1, teeltetloh of paepertT or opmranr aeatt b. poot.5.• tae P•rall, cmdlCltg with U.operation Standard.of Smlion 24.6 of the. ,","p' M.1.coney zoning ordinate, (d0: 0. Mtnlnf La the se,yr•ln Rive,mall b*arohlellod. Dnputr t ad Veld I yt�\ —_—_..`.— ! too a 25. )acme el Frlb Say Weld Corner eta 1 • reavatIoe Cr prowaalog of mum am gravel or 1.ka Coma eep.stmbnt or Planning. Seen.., Nall De granted !"'- tear)after r•claaAtien atoll it p.ra:ttd...sr chat 400 access eon the prop.ty act , reasonable Una in odd...to .• • feet to the St_.rain steer. the activities carried out of epa eel£1 coyly vita the Danion�ent Standard, n1.fed n eons d all applicable c- S. Ali opera clam m said a.tribe! parcel on.il be in Weld County pp.uelo.m. rr. conformance with the wed sou leeludbog. ter nom eealaetpne 23. herein Reel..area stall be it Ctc. ct the piano saw • yv: governed try the foregoing restuard11 am CU ' • A. aD 41 U,bares,or. tplae NalI Sc',loeed Se en.on epplloehle weidvminty IAlaaa. Any...aerial eevr.Lio.s VS.' abodred 13001 year flood plain of the It. .rain Rivet [u•DD• plans idea Ou.odxent e[e tamands es �p.2 Cary Lly ea.t.ted �el¢ll tfeaot, which would entreat paage of bleed floral and y e 5414 Comity 1 tlarniny Carmlaaia mad the board e! // !. A11 Sal cant.. optic ants, eamponrya Dalidlnem, N Dnraw act chAo.av cam the plans SuoGrdg 11 ocher ales. ten lbw that ldne .h•a v acting Ic'.aolee.e. Any other 413113.1.shall be tlt�a,in ch.oerlee (/-.•1.� e• roofed oshell be securely anchored•hea end tant. ilY limed boa natal. An at Rrno n!..rshal.. N. 111411.._- croofnd n avoid creation !•11 Ga3N lmeAra. Delleving 11. Tb property Dana o epnr.br shall h ml•Cfen et sin/bog.nit awpsratT b.ild log.•all n tame veil tlS gp.ake red 1.d, 1ylnP with all o[Ne foregoing seanazd•. yam i 'aw I ERR y o em foregoing 6tandaaem nay be t n tor N.' _ E. viable led days fouerlog approval b y the Soars f County revacet1013 of u.. r.enie by th. Comm o2 Comity u 4, ca•iaalannrs. Air!minions roreit hall ne obtained from e�l..lwyr.. ! .. /1 the Air Dollatlen COetni Pin•lon. Coleudo xawrtnnnt of neat N. The applicant stall eonly with all noelrexnts of the Permit to control te4ltive most end adois. IvglOitt Oust VR.lN ...,,,- • atilt b•controlled of this cite. 5,:.. 4. --- I - o. •, a. no nserent disposal 1.F wanes 55.01 M permitted Cr 4CC — \ _ %?y _ Spacial eviw rate. l� ! „� 1�N� ��, 4. Trim CO tn.Olsehary•et any etflaane to Sau nears. the 3r_ I a DPieloo. Neu apply for and obtain .m eNDLa f me dlorado Department of stealth, vans dnelity control DlnlLLoe. V. Tar ®l o a N ou eat • and Leval alts Nell Apt n2 *d 1 `1S rrr777 / the 1eeuEteial tl limit of 60 dD IA), and N. a•yoy llelc t4LLtm at p.m., a N mot •2 alas. .11 t c3 !! from T 400•- to)4000,.m.m.,an nail m • a 30 m fr fromJ+00 n c•4. 7,00 lam. t• tin s pravldn by State line and Au • Gates Manored attordls to C.P.A.1S-L3-102- g Ysi Aunt Ana 10. No u traeu Be 113111 nllmwd rl Panhandle PAele Lantern • SITE e• Pip•l/nee, ht-of-way r the St. maim euicatlnn h 214 AC (/ Dlserles anemone on tr.Special Nvier alt.. IL. The operator sna11 maintain the approved do.t notemant ii Drearau. yi .--.._ 12. TD* Prep.ed a .slog the sVttala elver null W. 2 MILES ri l ' t .1..ated .11ov th.P•tsage Of c.a.a and 2.1.11 boats on -.4 JO one r1.rr. IIIr .rt p I 13. Std Tet•peasrry-Signs shall be petted tae rancor fence •^, 1II■IIIIIi11)t�1 I -DELOAMII40/1-Q.5 end rulntain.e a ci.arly "Godly the hcoacinlo oa en STATE ro1;MmAy 139 ( ]TI Spaelal eta w mitt. t�l r l it l!. A]3 attar C0 in rim mitring 02 enrll be Yrwltcnd or y'1 deenee lei emr•re1A1 1.r a0e11taal v :' IS. Prlo[ to areay.ties 1.b tM 9ravLL Plt.•tDe applicant.E • Obtelo • it permit from the dun raglan . • . pgroe '� ell Cooney end State Bea1N Standards and npulatia3 i' pertaining to err Quality, quality,viols.emission.sod a ..niter:disown!Aete.a. -1ss�t( ,e. ..indjvide.I sewage disposal system or A vault shall be e end 4,4 et he...age drspnal system yet the att.. The "re. vault shall be Intellad according the Wald Cocnty dyYS [netvl0al Swag*ciapasal snTlatiens.m ,:'ClE4DrfBIG .-•.ki I'.,9tT{71987 ' irto •• iS prkrr.� �l li USR - 8Q9 7�a aE.bBng pnaOCIAd PO.acs app,ECULDe.t cOLD.2_1.,N141-1911 -�''' SW . 7. JOHN NAMES L/1»CCOtiSayLiSIIO e•' pp BOA 423:LhF*0tm,C0iQ n SCALE:I'.Goo' FRONTJen/MAYY i;�, ViGNlTy r " •Srlft011, •11 �" ._._ --. `Syr _, _ r a rxlitle, y • 1477. A ' " T,r. to o- " � 4 F w I3gy y r......' )-1 ,_ "' Y '4+ "' ri t:v -.. . '� � 'tx b3 , � ° K'� ti- e rT .. ` FRONTIER/ HAMM PROPERTY '" II LEGEND d MT ,•'P'`' —_•- • . nc) -- °' x. a'Aar u °A °° rar'oi'rvrt COlOocito CMOs,. RA TO IanIEu.«vn m••i urn, - F ON 4,T.2N,R.BBW„AND •' ' m w SNAIL m AIM O oaanA°noa•Oar r"'° '.5I/2 IN SECTION 4,L2N R 6¢1Qr., . Quincy!. WI inwn.r , .,FACILITIES Ovrm a v wo"m' EAST OF COUNTY ROADWELD COUNTY,COLORADO y FEEDER i • 401,VC In MO Pa;,K,°n°.m,am PALL II m o,mwC IS SF°A . A�nEn wOlvn A,Pmmr K.rowwa m m ruK.r auvo w o. =.nvno TRIO:O rv°n(SNP nw MU°ICAO,IC+vv w°wan.K.Am wKAI It I CONVEYOR wvm,,«CC.Ju ao,w"warO IF Klmur.TOR r.I°Pro 0 in,T•.�. TT°aO 9r:°rzv 1Lh•.wa Karamnc wu ARO Praia. .anaTOlu.eA ran O Kass To TK wnar Pa A.°:.v OIL,.n ! "`I°Yo°Int Oar. MISIIKmvsa.Oiaoo TO..°rid:.war:. IM ° w... A TOPSOIL STOCKPILE BERM mpmvnnnnawanwe Ya anmoa 6°naL 1 0 SttTIDIC. yi« C. ILL ACCESS arm MT Sao Saoi°«miir°:u ai+m ovoerK`.nnc'ri+m r'e:n:vi “Cr'..."...". � � ' ° -- al OIr A=40000nt*to.v'IP li r.sag ran ILlEnom,m«rw AO maim n•.:°K-. ' _ P _ s DE WATERING TRENCH -b I , �L/� POINT • ALL ° Snail °I a o oIc I r. /1 r/7-1/ r ° i/ ��j liii _ i rt v. erwww o, I�e.�is,9 qI J �{/ \ 1, r I° o` ' Wenn.0 I r PROCESSING AREA ° , I I AO A"ao.rru•r Kr OR wvon:,I MOTO PM // _ —. cN hi ,wash rB51DckPile5 �{` Inr r,i.I°I,:'o',.e o,na.r�:.w•n a: r.or .wA+ £• :i / I OUIPMENT STORAGE Ae a ruAa.,au.•.e. .<:wni" ` '0�/� DOSING n E a II/ / L I m�` \ E� Roo . / f l * WEIGH SCALES . / /'`�° AI -* � "'- ////,/PHASE _ �', i MOBILE OFFICE ( ;,/,••2 �l ;. /.....--c".(7751 Ill \.�`1 1/ �< PlW5ES • PROJECTED FLOOD PLAIN ' �' ° ; I I° ,�F C .. 1 / _/I PHASE AREA l / : 0 C-1 1=4 ASPHALT PLANT ,� / ,.��, .•�� f // / . • � CONCRETE PLANT I �� 1��.° /� HAS•TE ,. / I� VItpII j� I s • OS WESTERLY BOUNDARY �� f II�11 / !IhL R Wl . FL YEAR / / l b TOPSOIL STOCKPILE FLOOD PLAIN 11 rr , _ '� , 1ryu! I © /�� la 'seal s �-�t �� PHASE SUMMARY i �'� / ` b, qr / `.i C 'I /,USTarturau•m,,r PHASE NO ACRES NO YEARS / / \�-, l 1 H�P �S II II 76 35 !YR /�fPHASE I 1 r/'EAR m ZIAl3ittoSCALE2d / % 7 /• `� 2 ) ppm/ n K' A"CC'i'�` �1� TOTAL Iw AC 9 STATE """"°' " U S R - 809 a w*..a* .Oa.Om.4 K..« r .. •.. ....... -L ---. .. TIEFELO ASSOCIATES m".. ,.W..,., .,.41—, ;• .,,..- ^.•...., ,.......,..,....,:�:3=S:,_';gyp _. Lend nark*ai Cmail ' •:`gam'"' ,; ” .... • ~LA II?no,LL, •• ^ Blu,u?' rnv*a num.mawarw ao TM*. , .___ l j•Lj"' JOHN FUMES LAWCOLADITM, fib n. "u R as Lamm.cow*�* .1.4X-02/0.6-s..____ .- FNOAITIER1RdCT1GN 7,?,ef..x ., I'� Lg�.,, , •■ON; Mr" G O4121&140;12.111" JJ7fft 09/11/90 11.21 • [�'VW -f •,•t`er..%s‘&1:'' F ��.1••.r �- - '_. y. - 'irao oa .-5'j( ' ' `r S t:S�• `r r„• 0;r;7 `+ wX,�f'.. -s4-yyy ,�.,,, ! notl alas f aae➢maai.�'•� r sass afar ftn � ,• �ry 'L•� J t't .... :+E.... -,,,„„1,-s4......,,,.....,,,l' aS••Ns W'•% •. Y ".'X "'S:W?s ls�-t •i, /• -—---,--7----,—,_�! • ." v C y-: , ;,,,..z-k:.. .• ,,,, .i.S`J'1 ,p 1'b ✓ ..P. • . 1.. r+ '9g•� }'",tr e. Js. 7 r `• --.mow _ lot. . _ r� 3 IS AC. S IS AC. • " , • 6 SAC. • 7 20 AC. • • B 12 AC. a • 9 1 AC. • .. 98 AC. • (46.7%) • f D:.. BUILDING awrra, [brr/Id,r6 - USE PAD A 4.65 AC. • /sccnow•.rzr.ala. ° p .� Sir now a•7•.,00 B 6.68 AC.• ,570..:1,3:.:.,,,,,.. C 429 AC.• -- . c D 14 AC.• .;�I.AXE N0.• — 34.62 AC.• 116'8%J • O ! }� t j la. OPEN SPACE 77.38 AC.• 136.5x1 r ro �,Ij v 1. TOTAL 210 AC• 1100%1 O O sae ' _� accr A $ / of •_':' I + EXISTING uKE NO.1 {I— ^o ° LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE yJx C/�,,,,,r➢-. /,•-;....-6• '. /� I e AL FOWL ma ad meows ll ma.49 roe 01E tr eni1Y71C9. SCALE:1M➢ZOO' . ae OMM,,..✓Y� ° V i p /U1 ,n t.v NM M unrto n aenw nE fo 7a.rouuue urzl a n ra Ic nL,r. H C: ° G 0 o / •Ex•nts[Of Danatr II N•Ii.C4.aFC1'.V[ln•lu we..cE a la*En FUSE OF m o L•� O , / 0 EQl•E71N 10101: �, - /" O s I 0 _07/1 (I — • au utn 01 u 0ru nu r atnicccmD Tat LarlaU E{iu14 i Nano am TOPSOIL /O' 0 1 nn LESS IW alr 1910.1(L 1 out. WYDOEa tr.JUf.lu f[kY E!L0 EmWRD•f It O p _ •T LIST U U I Ia1TICEA -� ' p , '6. 0 0 •� ) rRE WID115 an Fan nu an E(ifOm 00 r0LiAnt MU MUNI 9.114E Pm f+AD. / ILL 3•SS nu aF Itrlrp tl LIE I•e4rICT9PS etPPtFEEJ VTV OF seam In Fort maw. A 0 .2./..:# �i �\'° z1� p a (r-.. LAKE 110.5 / • 1 . m1u or xo TEEn•1 E r Flftr[,1a TIIE IIn lQelYrl•1- rI.1Durlr n rk nEu oo °p , ,'If fEo 4J p Off---=:__..-=. ( E�'��LSE aiuiii�U"r`n �ItLEirKEf!€4c F�°QYri�i(�`ua"II(u n ra won. o o p ' LAKE No.e / b' ...1••••-•'..'.-------------01 / p It 0.• D e is o (•• is MUM glum ° ` O Very,I I tll MU Elul IT r ME rat 3•IT ULIFE9 SITE. ° I a Y • e(-7 11f a O4. I o •. {I� ° Op / '1� ',ma a Otf [r TIC LAKE WU / 6 0 9 „or,o 1 c.1p aD , \° o° LAKE N0.7 ° o • O o O .LAKE N0.9 1r Anil.MO MUMS, �.EEa o[ I/ .Ian 100.E MR • , V , .c. 'II 141 \/ 3 1{ a O - - •~ �/, ° a a O - oC p O- r WIT. r •. T� f1 • o jrr O t;` $ i; LAKE N0.3. . I• » //r\\\o / f O/1 N .oI al, y° ,.f 1'17 a K fE ��.. g ''�]r� k . 000 , 8 l i 9 • 8 //{? LAKE No.: i;�1 I yo 7d r•t•u•D0, C o I 11r1I1 ��rAfr...050,0 or II IIIIIIIIIIIIII<IIIIIIIIIII �rf lllllilBllllllllllllll I� ��f � � 4 I IK ____21 Illlllilillllill�l ff ff ' I � �� III ��IIIillilllllllulllulll!!I!�IIIIIIIIIiullllllllll�lilllllfklill�� `° ! lil �`• I' Ii;;IIIIIiIIII� I�IIn'�'11 Ia I1I �I II I 1 IuU I r1.7T•7! • •-..---NIOM'IAT It •••. -- US 1 R 1 809 0 •• VW aM•EI. '. Id PA alM•DeL JICrypi.'7114.1081 F ttt steam Ir r➢m,Oslo I•tnto E•eO4,i 1ll / yt I i j TIEFEL a ASSOCIATES • "', 010001E.I010001m.On...a. ... -,;,:4, .I • KO nenc Ede.UEEL .001A-4Jeatr 1 mow maws LAND. _t t:h7e1✓; • • �r,� air: 74 1! , i J 8 a C "Iiii R•R/Cr• ,''. • n1y _ rY, .�,•.Eg�C+,'X�?,,y,3,�,�K'tit'Syry ,ylr, �,�^^ T• w '�lr .'t- ..yr,�• IaM r•„= .: ..-. , •a . ., ••C ,.+•f'�YyttA `��y � :�'�$7_•s•Tf:'�;.2Tw �v,> .. .. ...S. - w7A.yY :.['? *''qI•�,+G K,I�>il,:'Sr- -• ,".. ¢-z 3.+„•-. _. ._ nra.•�k a. .. ,�1 1- ` AR2227691 RESOLUTION RE: GRANT CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) AND C-3 (COMMERCIAL) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (C-1 , C-2, C-3, C-4, AND I-1) USES AS LISTED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR HAROLD REESE, JR. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 13th day of September, 1989, at 10 :00 a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Harold Reese, Jr. , 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, New York 11563 , requesting a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) 0 o and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1 , C-2, C-3, o C-4 , and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance r., p for a parcel of land located on the following described real estate, to-wit: A o w Part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the 0 3 NE} of Section 15 , all in Township 2 North, oz Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, p Colorado a4 U WHEREAS, the applicant was represented by Mike McDonough, of a, a Land Consultants, and o WHEREAS, Section 28 . 8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance a provides standards for review of such a Change of Zone, and rn WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the z testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request H of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County m F Planning Commission, and, having been fully informed, finds that c") this request shall be approved for the following reasons: rn w 1 . The applicant has complied with all the application w requirements listed in Section 28 .5 et seq. , of the Weld Nz County Zoning Ordinance. z r 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28 . 8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: ,ter a. The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) N CO District is located within the I-25 Mixed-Use .No Development (I-25 MUD) area. The uses associated with the proposed PUD District are consistent with 891002 PLO/35 Page 2 RE: COZ - REESE the uses described in the I-25 MUD section of the Comprehensive Plan. b. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD District will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. c. The Left Hand Water District will provide water c oU service to the PUD District. The St. Vrain o Sanitation District will provide sewer service to N O the proposed PUD District. U d. Access shall be from the south end of the PUD o w District to the existing West 1-25 Frontage Road. 0 3 The Colorado Division of Highways recommended o a approval of the proposed access in a letter dated q July 18, 1989. w e. No overlay districts affect the site. The PUD Q, a. District does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. .. ,n 0 ix NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County w Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of rn U Harold Reese, Jr. , for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and rn z C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1 , C-2, C-3, C-4 , -1H and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance on the m ei above referenced parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject 0 a to the following conditions: w w 1 . Prior to recording the PUD District plat: VD ELI z a. The road identified as Turner Boulevard shall be r:4 renamed South Turner Boulevard; 0 b. The plat shall be amended to show a 100 foot right-of-way for the north/south road identified as r•- (N) South Turner Boulevard and the east/west road o located between Sections 10 and 15 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County; a 44 c. Reference to future PUD District access to the west or south shall be removed from the PUD District plat; d. The site data table shall be removed from the PUD plat; and 891002 Page 3 RE: COZ - REESE e. The application materials shall be amended to comply with the memo about site security and O facility protection from Sheriff Jordan dated v October 14, 1988 . M o 2 . The following notes shall be placed on the PUD District o plat: a 0 3 a. All streets within the PUD District are private and shall be built to County Standards. All streets o w within the PUD District shall be maintained by the owners of the PUD District unless other o arrangements are approved by the Board of County o Commissioners; rna w b. Access shall be only from the existing I-25 o x Frontage Road, adjacent to the east PUD District property line located in Section 15, Township 2 o a North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado; 01 rnF c. Outdoor storage shall be effectively screened from y I-25 and adjoining properties , and permitted only on lots located west of South Turner Boulevard; 01 w d. The minimum lot size shall be one acre; e. All signage shall comply with the Weld County C‘141 Zoning Ordinance; N f. Maximum building height shall be 35 feet; M g. A minimum 15 percent of each lot shall be r- o landscaped in accordance with the PUD Plan; -4o w w h. Each PUD Plan application shall include a traffic analysis performed in conjunction with the study titled Preliminary Traffic Study of the I-25 SUBDIVISION AT DEL CAMINO prepared by Matt Delich, dated May 1, 1989. The traffic study shall identify road improvements for the PUD Plan. If applicable, an off-site Road Improvements Agreement or a local improvement district shall also be in place and capable of generating funds to construct the off-site road improvements needed to serve the PUD District and Plan. 891002 Page 4 RE: COZ - REESE i . The initial PUD Plan application shall include a storm water management plan and a detailed master o o drainage plan for the PUD District. All subsequent O PUD filings shall include a storm water management d o plan designed in accordance with the master drainage plan; A a a j . Each PUD Plan application shall include a orx management plan to control weeds before, during, h w and after development. This plan shall be approved % by the Longmont Soil Conservation District; O 0 k. The requirements of the Longmont Rural Fire al x Protection District, Flume Ditch Company, Colorado `.. 0 Geological Survey, and Army Corps of Engineers o shall be met as part of each PUD Plan application; 0 w and �� 1 . A site plan review is required in accordance with CM Z the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. r-1 H \ W CM o U) The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made x and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 13th day of -1 September, A.D. , 1989. O141 N w LJ � • _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS N Z ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO N 4 O '' Weld County erk and Recorder /ir n o and Clerk` tpthe Board C.W. Kir y, C irman N a ,,,{{{{{ EXCUSED N o �--By: �` r ,� x � Jac ine Johnso , Pro-Tem ' Deputy Cb y' C1 k t mw APPROVED S TO FORM:, Gene R. Brantner Li y George Ken 417 Q County Attorney Gord c a y / 891002 HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 89-37 RE: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) AND C-3 (COMMERCIAL) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, AND I-1) USES AS LISTED IN THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE - HAROLD REESE, JR. A public hearing was conducted on September 13, 1989, at 10:00 A.M. , with the following present: Commissioner C.W. Kirby, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem - Excused Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner George Kennedy Commissioner Gordon E. Lacy Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 7, 1989, and duly published August 10, 1989, in The New News, a public hearing was conducted to consider the application of Harold Reese, Jr. , for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this matter of record. Rod Allison, representing the Planning Department, entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Mike McDonough, of Land Consultants, came forward to represent the applicant. Mr. McDonough answered questions of the Board regarding traffic access, traffic flow, and drainage in the area. (Tape change #89-39) No public comment was offered concerning this request. Commissioner Lacy moved to approve the request of Harold Reese, Jr. , for a Change of Zone, subject to the Conditions contained in the Planning Commission's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brantner, and it carried unanimously. This Certification was approved on the 18th day of September, 1989. APPROVED: �,� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: tfil �ck/:d{P� �l WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Cl k and Recorder and Clerk to the Boar C.W. Kirby, Cha an eperllx--m-c-�-�' � EXCUSED uty County Cler Jacqu 1 e Johnson, Pro-Tem ene R. Brantner George Kenned r Gord'b S yj TAPE #89-38 & #89-39 DOCKET #89-37 PLO135 891002 ATTENDANCE• RECORD • TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 DOCKET #89-37 CHANGE OF ZONE ( A & C-3 to PUD) - HAROLD REESE, JR. DOCKET #89-41 USR-OPEN-PIT MINING OPERATION AND MATERIALS PROCESSING FACILITY - C & M COMPANIES ,PLEASE write or print legibly your- name, address and the DOC # (as listed ' ,above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING �}o il. _ 50S6 (.il, c? . Rd . 0 & 4n ' /L J7 rte j 50 �-.J fig;,,c-�— C' PI/rti,7 °, • • 891032 NOT I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Should the applicant or any interested party desire the presence of a court reporter to make a record of the proceedings, in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing, the Clerk to the Board's Office shall be advised in writing of such action at least five days prior to the hearing. The cost of engaging a court reporter shall be borne by the requesting party. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 89-37 Harold Reese, Jr. 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, New York 11563 DATE: September 13, 1989 TIME: 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately } mile south of Colorado Highway 119; west of I-25 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: August 7, 1989 PUBLISHED: August 10, 1989, in The New News 591002 Punnet * imam imps_of 1 State et eat me WticegqiibeZtrbe��NOTICE • d Cask Colorado dal w Fleor. } at tYa-time G"eley"tealle All !e 1r� aoy rammer Change in tEe one are requested to NOepepu a m Y b0 Should interested the PLM desire ¶N fllierecord et d a to Ina Pon to taVairt arra bravised In. 11:g d action at least five prior the nearing. The cart ca rPZo law ingeourto shall the Weld Count/tat and 0a Monk* the be to t1 ee Bed ard t peke GI he Come Commisdmers, located in the Weld Coal Th915 10th street ird Flow, Y Colorado: APPLICANT 147 Harold Roost,Jr.Sunrise ay Fyn Nenbu 1 lUW DATE:Sentamb. 18,1999 Time: 10: AEQU(A ) of Zone add from ep(aCva�lompow�reaitel))Cto SPlanned�Unit. the 1/4 10 I and1•A as rout'jet the a-+�., lConpApL -" p�Pgartnardt of the 4 /�/��J /� T ;North, lb West ' ... d- the Township P.M., W Coueb,Coloradomile south d�HHWIvay 1191 west of COUNTY CO WELD /2 BY: MARY ANN COUNTY CLERK AND �/�J y RECORDER AND CLERIC TO _ /G(J�<LC. t &L_. C t./f�`C.. �.t.�,/— DATED: �BuYsu�MTr NdB.DWutY { PUBNISHND: Au9uatMU. 19M, in The New News 891002 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA i ION .� - State of Colorado County of Boulder NOTICE Purses to the zoning laws of the State of Colo- rado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a I, Dean G. Lehman ,do public hearing will be held In the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado; Weld County Centennial Center, 915 solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES CALL is a 10111 Street First Floor,Greeley,Colorado;at the time specified.All persons in any manner Inter- daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in Bated In the following proposed Change of Zone are regtuestedto attend and may be heard.. the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, and Should the applicant or any Interested party de- sire the presence of a court reporter to make a which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder and record of the proceedings,in addition to the taped record which will be kept during the hearing,the Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously and Clerk to the Board's Office shat] be advised In writing of such action at least Nye days prior to uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months the hearbfle..Tne cost of engaging a court report- er shall Abe borne by the requesting party. next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice of BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commis- advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the moil may be examined In the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners,located in United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions the Wald County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street,Third Floor,Greeley,Colorado. of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that APPLICANT DOCKET NO.69-37 Harold Reese,Jr. said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for ass sunrise Highway publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning DATE: September 13,1989Lynbrook,New York n563 TIME: 10:00 A.M. of the laws of the State of Colorado; that a copy of each number of REQUEST: Change of Zone from A(Agricultural) and said newspaper, in which said notice of advertisement was C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Devel- opmentas published, was transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the te IIn the Weld County Zoning Ordinance ance LEGAL DESCRIPTION: subscribers of said newspaper, according to the accustomed Part of the SEY4 of Section 10 and part of the NEVa of Section 15,all in Township 2 North, mode of business in this office. Range 68 West of the 6th.P.M.,Weld Coun- ty,Colorado LOCATION.: That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published Approk mateiy a mile south of Colorado g Highway it9;west of U 925 ,BOARD OR COUNTY COMM{$0STONERS in the regular and entire edition of said daily newspaper once; Br Mria A N FEUERSTBINN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER and that one publication of said notice was in the issue of said AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY:Mary Reiff,Deputy Au 30 DATEa�;,�,�Auqust 7,117°9 ust newspaper dated g , 19 89. rnp n'$pally Times-Call, Longinoht. Celt ##Net 304 1HR., /a General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of August ,19 89 \tNC ^f� \ l ` .A l I'u 0V -\c\YYY\V•Pf\CYWN, Notary Public fS r, FEE$ 26.00 \rA MMY conk IS'51 N EXIIHES IE ) 1 APRIL ,yy2 it INIJNS >� 3(oNUMJN?5\NQCOLOHnJ( Sp50' ci,y4 891002 DATE: August 7, 1989 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners : If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 13th day of September, 1989 , at 10 : 00 A.M. Docket No. 89-37 - Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1 , C-2, C-3 , C-4 , and I-1 uses) - Harold Reese, Jr. OFFICE OF THE CL R THE BOARD BY: a 1 Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO �vw 891002 6k, !j MEMORAfDU • W I Rod Allison, Planning August 10, 1989 To Date Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From Harold Reese, Z-449 Subject: I have reviewed the most recently submitted materials and proposal by Micheal B. McDonough, of Land Consultants, in the letter dated July 12, 1989. Restricting this site with two accesses onto the existing Frontage Road will eliminate the traffic impact in the area of Turner Boulevard and State Highway 119. All the traffic must flow along the existing Frontage Road and access State Highway 52 to the south. Although this plan eliminates the immediate concern, it does not address long-term access to the site, or the future traffic flow in the immediate area. Therefore, I recommend no access be allowed into the I-25 Subdivision PUD, except the two proposed onto the existing Frontage Road. The possible future extensions shown on the plat should not be allowed unless a revised PUD is approved which addresses the cost to upgrade existing and proposed facilities that would serve the site. The road indicated as Turner Boulevard, and the east-west road, should have 100' rights-of-way because of the potential future use as an arterial. This is true particularly in light that Turner Boulevard to the north of this site could be extended and tied into this proposed industrial development. Since Turner Boulevard is not to be constructed through, the proposed name of Turner Boulevard, should be changed. DLS/mw:prhr xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Harold Reese, Z-449 ri3PFETH,1791_:1707,779-Th AUG 1 1 1989 891002 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 1, 1989 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on August 1, 1989, in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room (Room #101) , Weld County Centennial Building, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Bud Halldorson, at 1:33 p.m. Tape 348 - Side 1 Ann Garrison Present Jerry Burnett Present LeAun Reid Present Rick Iverson Present Jerry Kiefer Present Ernie Ross Present Bud Halldorson Present Also present: Rod Allison, Principal Planner, Keith Schuett, Current Planner, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary A quorum was present. The Chairman announced the Board of Equalization, previously scheduled for Room #101, has been moved to Room #316. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 18, 1989, was approved as distributed. ayCASE NUMBER: Z-449 (Continued from June 6, 1989) APPLICANT: Harold Reese, Jr. REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE! of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 miles south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of 1-25 APPEARANCE: Mike McDonough, AICP, Land Consultants, represented the applicants. This request is for a change of zone from agricultural and commercial-three to Planned Unit Development. This site contains approximately 132 acres. They have worked out an agreement with the State Highway Department and the Weld County Engineering Department for access on the first lot. 9910O Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting August 1, 1989 Page 2 Mr. McDonough reported they have reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff and have no objections. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the audience. There was none. The Chairman asked that the recommendation of the Department of Planning Services staff be filed with the summary as a permanent record of these proceedings. MOTION: Rick Iverson moved Case Number Z-449 for Harold Reese, Jr. , for a change of zone from agricultural and commercial to planned unit development be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recommendation and conditions presented by the Department of Planning Services' staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison - yes; Jerry Burnett - yes; LeAnn Reid - yes; Rick Iverson - yes; Jerry Kiefer - yes; Ernie Ross - No; Bud Halldorson - yes. Motion carried with six voting for the motion and one voting against the motion. The two applications for North Weld County Water District are both major facilities of a public utility. Therefore, the Planning Commission's decision for approval is final. If the planning commission's decision is for denial, the applicant may request a hearing with the Board of County Commissioners, and the Board may or may not reverse the decision of the Planning Commission. CASE NUMBER: USR-884 APPLICANT: North Weld County Water District PEQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review permit for a Major Facility of a Public Utility for a water storage tank located in the A (Agricultural) zone district LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW} of Section 19, TEN, R6JW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LCCATION: Approximately one mile north and nine miles west of the Town of Pierce; north of Weld County Road 90, east of Weld County Road 13 891002 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING f8NMLSSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Rick Iverson that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-449 NAME: Harold Reese, Jr. ADDRESS: 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, NY 11563 REQUEST: A change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1) uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mile south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25. The Weld County Planning Commission recommends this request be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 28.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The rezoning request is in conformance with Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is located within the 1-25 Mixed-Use Development (1-25 MUD) area. The uses associated with the proposed PUD district are consistent with the uses described in the I-25 MUD section of the Comprehensive Flan. - The uses allowed in the proposed PUD district will conform with the performance standards contained in Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. - The Left Hand Water District will provide water service to the PUD district. The St. Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer service to the proposed PUD district. - Access shall be from the south end of the PUD District to the existing west 1-25 frontage road. The Colorado Division of Highways recommended approval of the proposed access in a letter dated July 18, 1989. 8910 2 r B Z-449 Harold Reese, Jr. Page 2 - No overlay districts affect the site. The PUD district does not contain any known commercial mineral deposits. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the application submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the PUD district plat: - The road identified as Turner Boulevard shall be renamed South Turner Boulevard; - The plat shall be amended to show a 100 foot right-of-way for the north/south road identified as South Turner Boulevard and the east/west road located between Sections 10 and 15, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, of the 6th P.M. , Weld County; - Reference to future PUD district access to the west or south shall be removed from the PUD district plat; - The site data table shall be removed from the PUD plat; and - The application materials shall be amended to comply with the memo about site security and facility protection from Sheriff Jordan dated October 14, 1988. 2. The following notes shall be placed on the PUD district plat: - All streets within the PUD district are private and shall be built to County Standards. All streets within the PUD district shall be maintained by the owners of the PUD district unless other arrangements are approved by the Board of County Commissioners; - Access shall be only from the existing I-25 Frontage Road, adjacent to the east PUD district property line located in Section 15, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado; - Outdoor storage shall be effectively screened from I-25 and adjoining properties, and permitted only on lots located west of South Turner Boulevard; 891002 Z-449 Harold Reese, Jr. Page 3 - The minimum lot size shall be one acre; - All signage shall comply with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; - Maximum building height shall be 35 feet; - A minimum 15 percent of each lot shall be landscaped in accordance with the PUD plan; - Each PUD plan application shall include a traffic analysis performed in conjunction with the study titled Preliminary Traffic Study of the I-25 SUBDIVISION AT DEL CAMINO prepared by Matt Delich, dated May 1, 1989. The traffic study shall identify road improvements for the PUD Plan. If applicable, an off-site road improvements agreement or a local improvement district shall also be in place and capable of generating funds to construct the off-site road improvements needed to serve the PUD District and Plan. - The initial PUD plan application shall include a storm water management plan and a detailed master drainage plan for the PUD district. All subsequent PUD filings shall include a storm water management plan designed in accordance with the master drainage plan; - Each PUD plan application shall include a management plan to control weeds before, during, and after development. This plan shall be approved by the Longmont Soil Conservation District; - The requirements of the Longmont Rural Fire Protection District, Flume Ditch Company, Colorado Geological Survey, and Army Corps of Engineers shall be met as part of each PUD plan application; and - A site plan review is required in accordance with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Motion seconded by Ann Garrison. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ann Garrison Ernie Ross Jerry Burnett LeAnn Reid Rick Iverson Jerry Kiefer Bud Halldorson 891002 Z-449 Harold Reese, Jr. Page 4 The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case tc the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on August 1, 1989, and recorded in Book No. XII of the proceedings of the Planning Commission. Dated the 2nd day of August, 1989. Bobbie Good Secretary 891002 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Z-449 Harold Reese, Jr. 1. In a phone conversation on July 31, 1989, the County Engineer recommended approval with the following conditions: - Offeite access be limited to the two access points onto the existing frontage road as shown on plat; Extension of access to the north, south, and west be removed and considered only if a new or amended PUD plan application is submitted; - Turner Boulevard be changed to South Turner Boulevard; and - The north/south road and east/west road right-of-ways within the PUD district be increased to county arterial status of 100 feet. 8910e2 INVENTORY OF ITEMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION Case Number Z'!{wq Submitted or Prepared • Prior to Hearing at Hearing 1. Application Pages (50 2. Applicant plat(s)(a)pages) 3. DPS Referral Summary Sheet • 4. DPS Recommendation • v 5. DPS Surrounding Property Owner's Mailing List 6. DPS Mineral Owner' s Mailing List 7. DPS Maps Prepared by Planning Technician 8. DPS Notice of Hearing ✓ 9. DPS Case File Summary Sheet 10. DPS Field Check 11. Ore' taker- 51tideme.t - A,It2 12719ty-2 rc eo 7/ 12. New 'VD �Uf..�f �l ! ' lzr cn 1 ✓ 13. J.efkr Frain (Awe rcPoNO+ deta IVr. l261l`!1-17 v/- 14' Mee+. € +{,e Army ►4Pc. Y ryes_zP49ea r/ q f.l ✓ 15. /WI", Oa ii,d�',�� l� /5�. bleu �mfrc�iin- 16. jO Marti2q, Il�ol ; ( a./ocea/y,ir,• ,briny ; r ✓ 17.ft/6,0 htti /✓a24. 249 g'©e 19 6roi., Erb j i a/ 18.At, 44/ "r442-71 /4/1 {c Mar+ 3ro cc w 5 lead • o 1 'goy- 20. ✓ lg./flew >>) f✓larcl.2Dl t f4 Fra,- r". ErP'lo.— rc- Memo viq+� (V11t�rcht3ilg1,�1 �0(r QYU,II e c` f 0 21. /✓iPirn4 r IIMA9Awrcb Zd !y(� rrrn let I ( ,NrrKti- `7tr- I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. ' I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office on . //e- Current Planner STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCi!giAD6ANp SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS is day of C3.. �we''‘ 19 %'l • /A �� .. .. ,,:�Q�,; NOTAR PUBLIC n r,o yi. +rs is;% boom ha• • , lr"r;: 8910 2 ,. �. My Commission Expires � � -------�•' 22' F:4) Ott. /c fro)-- T✓a� Fj orrege Ara/ y-1-i- 17 , TraFF,'c S+,7 eteo' MR`/ cote,e, fro_ (4tt :Pel,LL v' ( par) 24 , Le. " hut' May ('I I'h Frog v filly retembfo„_; 2,4,0 Mtrno 2r, ` kV Mar 27 i4b``i Im ),-eu S'c1,e/fiv y i. ; I ps-y_. 2 4, Merv., eietti Pi"- 3I2yfi Ira-- Neu .6.1.(141,1c//Nf c J' j fofre AP,.'/ /3/9/3 a PAliy , - 64,,t1 F r i 'y, lie 13610 TNNe y l f)ecc yet . Mein o Attti Aer. l c Frew A , ill otn-aJeJ, leery_ L Feu--- &Jac T'AtieHlir filem\c, Jr-41 n/ I t if?, (cam—./ o , ;(SAATC: 8910C2 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case erz" - Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description A. 19 -rti.7 4,97 r"i &y �fzs, /aG?.��, 67B. /.4 /�,; e71- A 1 04 C. /�.G 2''�r�''.�'„y 2?L V2./s..a7L' D. L %I /,i' /G^` �/JZL-�-2. `� i` Zi_ l't ' (1 E. ( �%' /a67- �C _'Z,�,/ -' ci^�' " F. / �'�?.u�� C fi A i'/Gtll�2CN `i G. - H. I. J.. R. L. M. N. • 0. 8910°'.2 Date: April 11, 1989 CASE NUMBER: Z-449 NAME: Harold Reese, Jr. ADDRESS: 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, NY 11563 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and I-1 uses as listed in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately .5 mile south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25 Planning Commission Function: To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners consistent with the criteria listed in Section 28.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Land-Use Information Acres (approximately) Site Area 132 Commercial and Industrial Uses 113 Roads and Easements 19 Approximately 45 lots would be created. The minimum lot size is 1 acre. The maximum building height is 35 feet. Lot coverage by building, parking, and storage areas would not exceed 85%. Access: The existing frontage road in the northeast corner of the site, north to the intersection of Highway 119 and I-25 and the existing frontage road dead ending at Weld County Road 22 right-of-way south to Weld county Road 20-1/2. Water: Left Hand Water District Sewer: St. Vrain Sanitation District Fire Protection: Longmont Rural Fire Protection District Police Protection: Weld County Sheriff Custom lots are proposed to be created through the PUD plan application process. Building type and quality, covenants, stormwater management, landscaping, signage, utilities, and PUD circulation (streets and sidewalks) would be detailed in final form at the PUD plan stage. Referral agencies who have returned specific recommendations are included in this packet. 891002 Z-449 Harold Reese, Jr. Page 2 POSSIBLE ISSUE: Representatives of the Colorado Division of Highways have requested additional time to review the transportation study and drainage information. Highway Department comments will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. The applicant's transportation study does not appear to meet the requirements of Section 28.8.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. The transportation study does not sufficiently describe off-site road improvements or how installation of those improvements will be guaranteed. 891002 FIELD CHECK Filing Number: Z-449 Date of Inspection: March 17, 1989 Applicant's Name: Harold Reese, Jr. Request: A change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) . Legal Description: Part of the SE$ of Section 10 and part of the NEk of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: 2,400 feet south of Colorado Highway 119 and west of I-25. Land Use: N: River Valley Village Mobile Home Park, Del Camino Repair, Twin Peaks R.V. , New Vision Homes, Longmont Supplies, Dalton Truck Sales, Pigeon Products Mfg. , Truck Wash, 2 Motels, D.Q. , McDonald's, Burger King, and Texaco E: I-25, Flatiron Structures, agriculture S: Agriculture W: Agriculture, sand and gravel mining operation Zoning: N C-3 (Commercial) E PUD (Planned Unit Development) and A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A (Agricultural) COMMENTS: There are no improvements on the property. The property is covered with native grasses and could be used as pasture land. An agricultural type access exists in the northeast corner of the property to the west I-25 Frontage Road. The paved, two lane west I-25 Frontage Road dead-ends at the northeast corner of the property. There is no frontage road abutting the north 2,200 feet of the site, along the east property line. A paved, two lane west I-25 Frontage Road abuts the south 2,400 feet of the site, along the east property line. The north half of the site slopes gradually to the northeast. The south half of the site slopes gradually the east. Rod Allison Principal Planner 891002 < " - i III / ' __�_.'1 a 1 F; .3 oe) Lil• . I 40Q _; — LkJ: , . 7 4 ___—__ . ,r • ,' • — I as 1•••:: M 13)::11: •;h.::::ALIEN • -38 • , 36 • 1 ''•• • AT ' a L - - - - - -- 32 •7!rTi •• 2_34 • • • •iK, • ETSri. 111. . 'tl . ( /1 • Q �2 • • xx '- x, r- �°H. I . �. � .mks I • E. ( '!'....d• \ . \. e (rY F. ro xr °s a. °,Cis' .( -I. ^� 1 30 • o .y� Y C I [ .. • e. • i ry ,• ` _° a q ; 1 \ yanp�p qq Ft ste, IS s x> • von za t, �Gowen** x --G ! • • �a'`- ' • 11.. ] 0' ;MAO Safi„ • e]o1- _ ____' I pp' al 2 ..al G—' • 00a777\\\111 \° a i 28 _. • • , _I 3 _ R. o( 11. STATE REC I ) E• . ,-I I --- 2 °nOA 0 1 24 • ,":7:7„, • i°. °� O v • • I� ��: 111CX11 TL *.k,,,,,_(,.. ::::::11, :\--\: E �l x 22 ]s. i °° • `:INW ] a , 1 3+ i.::311. 20 •- caT2N. •• -•. I •- � - • J pi yg POR.S elf —xr x. ' xr x �II I'nlf I � 16 I L. h/ G I -- .G c : 1 • I\ . Y. • ] �: 3 ac, C..„2„5,)�•.] °t I. al ]r i\\I 22H •gym ]> e• l • M 14 .-- ro A0 us ash: ., °/3 -=• =°- f ••-�M I.0,, ,�� 1 . .` : 3x •bi , a-,I x • .i G12 � �y �IB: 1 �. �� . • .1 ®•�°1 ' ° {I r 1 ••x_ .1 I 1 o )" I A ' .^'0 l • fa •h 0 •' T a 4' i..-,,,,,,,,'1I S ./.r . •.. tiTh ' ]° x = ] p > 'y I o. / '•� • / t J s • io% rfveE&G .: 6 •O E __ •I��° I ' q flfl' L , l C. T' ri I. r -\ . ,.. \ I l�r: GA n5E ..IL \ .iG :. \ • 2 ,0 I A A W u ' A 1 , 0®2 .�o.s ,• F 1 s. R.68 ! 67•189 `. 1 i _/ f pe5_—i �iJ x az� �' -\ `,` °° - _�" '-•— -a--- 489 4823 CHANCE 1 vi - -4850,7„--/ Fm 51 _ ----.4826 '�,.� o �P _—. 14832 .1 )/1_j ec°\ i�i ''�. /d e 1 6 .a ` --- 448431 _ -: „,,,„ __H-_ , , , , , ,f ' _ , 0 1 Grevel Pit "'� .e O�tG rB= 1 �� 4840..1 / l___•7 , 119 _ r • . : ! 48431 a:aB°Well yy 1' 1 m° i� �P T �° 1 4850 DU I �i r o 4856 v. 1O * • 1-1� �.' 12 1 .1„.„ i _.... ii t ems° p560 6'�� %� `moo w' -�� _" -.,,� �(.___/-\---. ��)) sue �'' / y �- , � , I ,„( \ 'I _, \J �� I� �/' RI_nN ❑g.e 1 i rM � �.�s ��— '. 5, d . i 6, , 1 e / L 0 ird t A lame �� _ _ at, 1 f \ : / — llll o/ co co ,° 1 48 I Rinn / �� A �� _16,r: 15 il' '-''' ' IT_____" f l 1 v io � II `r 1/7:1,_, ,-/ ri--: ' )`BMI . 920 . - - -" i 49251 / o l\ \ 488?/ — ,4882 • ___ X920 / 1 I) / u 1 e� -----v) \ \ 2 / 0, ,_s Scho 1 ..-A\.!'\\:".\\ .. .t� , l , ;X. ,• . • •-y ,,,yj r Ssi{l.'�az• i • 'i-a::.:.y'. tit • -f•'� :`,:t i "',,,,.wi. •t is �,.. -��a;,•.'„:r.. f� i -�+}(' �`' "x`it „en• t :r O39 '•=r' 424(.2' r i. l 4• f• , r,:rY • 1 1,! 1 60709 -••.1.. 4%2G.f/) ':::: ° - • :- ' • • y .. ' !fix;.-- a * MINX �.J. .—.�... . `�` •I,p t ••• -' ) s T • ..._.,�•� �.�.• • C..) •. _ 'r, :' .. ''. ..• y :tiff • +:• .: ,•t.. •y' 4 a... R tii•...., . . . , , „ . . .. • ..! • , •-.fug t- -. )_ -,( .., �•' ^' } +•« ." '-' }', �'` ,' . t.; ' 891®' 1 \.: E REFERRAL LIST NAME: Harold Reese, Jr. CASE NUMBER: Z-449 REFERRALS SENT: March 20. 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: April 3, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault v X Health Department Brighton Extension Service _Dacono Emergency Management Office _Eaton • X Sheriff's Office _Erie • X Engineering _Evans _Housing Authority Firestone _Airport Authority _Fort Lupton _Building Inspection Frederick Garden City STATE Gilcrest Division of Water Resources _Greeley • A Geological Survey Grover Department of Health _Hudson X Highway Department Johnstown Historical Society Keenesburg Water Conservation Board _Kersey X Oil and Gas Conservation Commission La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS o X Longmont _Ault F-1 _Mead Berthoud F-2 _Milliken Brighton F-3 _New Raymer Dacono F-19 Nunn _Eaton F-4 _Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 _Severance Galeton F-6 _Windsor _Hudson F-7 _Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES _La Salle F-9 Adams , X Longmont F-10 _Boulder _Milliken F-11 Larimer _Nunn F-12 Pawnee Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 , X US Army Corp of Engineers Poudre Valley F-15 _USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 _Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER _Fort Collins Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Greeley Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. X Longmont , X Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER a X Geological Survey (Candace Jochim) • X Ivan Cosnell X Rural Ditch Company 891002 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS t�EMT OF P.O. Box 850 �ag�� 5', 1 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 t.. „� °/ (303) 353-1232 "{" a July 18, 1989 Weld Co. — I-25 I-25 Subdivision File: Reese P.U.D. z mi. S. of S.H. 119 on W. side I-25 r DOH File 45100 lk r. .1t\V� �IC Mr. Rod Allison, Principal Planner JUL 1 9 1989 Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Weld Cu. PlaluIRI ul3lunllSSmu Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: We have reviewed the amendment to the I-25 Subdivision P.U.D. and the July 12, 1989, Narrative Supplement submitted by Michael McDonough. Based on the amended plan and the narrative, our concerns with regard to adverse traffic impacts at Turner Boulevard and State Highway 119 have been resolved. Other issues which we have addressed in previous reviews of this project relate to the following; access to the I-25 frontage road, control of surface drainage, possible need for a Utility Permit, and wetland resource impacts. We reiterate the need for an Access Permit to connect the internal subdivision roads with the I-25 frontage road. Particular consideration should be given to the design of the north access connection to ensure that sufficient right of way will be available for the design speed of the radius curve at the north end of the frontage road. It is our understanding that a 100-foot right of way is required for this road according to the Weld County Comprehen- sive Plan. A 100-foot right of way width for the internal road with appropri- ate flairs at the connection to the I-25 frontage road should be adequate to serve the proposed design. It would also be desirable at this time to assess the north access design in relation to the possibility that the frontage road could eventually be extended to the north to eliminate the existing gap. If this extension is required based on future area traffic needs, it is likely that the north end of the present frontage road would have to be elevated to reduce the existing steep grade. This would require a similar elevation and reconfigura- tion of the access connection to achieve acceptable sight distance to the south. 891032 MR. ROD ALLISON Ci JUL 1 9 1989 July 18, 1989 l 4✓ Page Two Our comments regarding drainage, Utility Permit, and wetland impacts should be addressed as necessary during the P.U.D. review process. We would appre- ciate the opportunity to review any further referrals on this project in relation to our interests. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Please contact me at 350-2168 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS D. RAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER Wallace R. Jacob on Development Planning/Acce s Coordinator WRJ/smw cc: L.D. Yost Area Foreman File: Jacobson via Rames-Crier 891002 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ÷E"T �kk P.O. Box 850 f Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 * �' (303)353-1232 i^ -.° Weld Co. - I-25 1-25 Sub. File: Reese P.U.D. z mi. S. of SH 119 on W. side I-25 DOH FILE 1+5100 May 19, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: We have reviewed the memorandum of May 1, 1989, by Matt Delich regarding the traffic impact of the proposed I-25 Subdivision at Del Camino. The follow- ing comments incorporate a review of the traffic study by Mr. Bob Tenney of our Denver office and expand upon previous reviews of October 19, 1988, February 13, 1989, and April 17, 1989. The trip generation and distribution have been found to be reasonable, however, the westbound left-turn movement onto Turner Boulevard remains as a major issue. Based on existing roadway geometrics, the level of service at this location would be unacceptable since left-turning vehicles would block the inside westbound through-lane on State Highway 119. This condition would exist for the short range (1993) traffic and for the long range (2010) traffic even if the projected additional laneage were to be in place. The long range left-turn volumes are so high that it does not appear feasible to provide acceptable storage capacity, especially with the large number of multi-unit trucks in this area. The study recommends lengthening the existing left-turn lane between Turner Boulevard and the west ramps. Lengthening of this lane to 300 feet as proposed, including a minimum 120-foot taper for a 12-foot wide lane at 35 m.p.h. , would allow 180 feet of decel lane and storage. This is considerably less than the 275-foot decel lane plus approximately 250 feet of storage which would be required for 1993 traffic, according to the State Highway Access Code. Implementation of this solution would also involve closing the existing median break which would affect access to the Texaco and Road Runner facilities. 8910C2 MR. ROD ALLISON May 19, 1989 Page Two The above concerns emphasize the need for a long-range comprehensive analysis of traffic operations in the vicinity of I-25 along State Highway 119. Alterna- tives involving future access to State Highway 119 west of Turner Boulevard along with the necessary connecting road system need to be planned. Although we will be doing a study this fall to address the interchange area, it is premature to identify what solutions may be recommended at the Turner Boulevard intersection. No state funds are available at this time to do any improvements to State Highway 119 in this area. According to our previous discussion, the drainage impact of this subdivision may not be resolved at this stage of the review process. We refer you to the comments attached to our letter of April 17, 1989, on this subject. We ask that the issues raised in the "Speed Memo" from Mr. Mommandi be resolved at the appropriate time. In a related matter, we would like to add a comment regarding the potential impact of this subdivision on the wetland resource in order to avoid potential sanctions on the developer. Contact should be made with Mr. Jerry McKee with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at 979-4120 (Littleton) to determine potential requirements. Thank you for the opportunity to review this subdivision. Please contact me at 350-2168 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS RAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER ,%x 7-4.-2( /l ( 2n Wallace R. Ja9$bson Development Planning/AcEess Coordinator WRJ:smw cc: Drew Scheltinga, Weld County Engineer - Greeley Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , Traffic/Transportation/Civil Engineering 3413 Banyan Avenue, Loveland, Colorado 80537 File: Jacobson via Rames - Crier B7;7 L'1� L �� MAY 2 2 1989 �� + L1 891032 aid Cu. Pl;,,,aklt onMOM:m6 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS "Qy�ENt OF% P.O. Box 850 -cro? �* Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 ;; (303) 353-1232 0f April 17, 1989 Weld Co. - I-25 APR 1 7 1989 I-25 Sub. File: Reese P.U.D. z mi. S. of SH 119 WeId CO. Moog Gaouni iuti on W. 1-25 F.R. DOH File 45100 Mr. Rod Allison Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: We have reviewed the I-25 Subdivision P.U.D./Change of Zone (formerly Reese P.U.D. ) . This submittal includes a revised Traffic Study and a Drainage Report which have been reviewed by staff in Greeley and the Denver office. I am including copies of comments received from the Denver office on the traffic and drainage issues. In addition to Mr. Tenney's comments on the traffic study, I would add our concern with regard to the need for a further level of service analysis. Levels of service should be analyzed based on the existing 2-lanes of traffic between the east and west on/off ramps as well as the projected 5-lane section. A major concern which is not addressed in the traffic study involves the capacity of the existing westbound median left-turn lane at Turner Blvd. This lane has very limited storage or deceleration capability and cannot be lengthened without affecting the eastbound left-turn lane. We request that all traffic and drainage comments be addressed in revised reports. Please refer revisions to me for further review as they become available. Contact me at 350-2168 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS RAMES DISTRICT ENGINEER -712A Lie to Wallace R. acobson Development Planning/ ccess Coordinator WJ:cas Enclosures cc: File: Jacobson via Crier 891002 STATER ��'�J{/�) S f Ai �. r._COLOO-,.__s+�/ �/ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 4201 East Arkansas Ave. 1.e9-4(..) Denver.Colorado 80222 [J�� [\��/�'(J _ (303)757.9011 D R . 1 _.1.1 ? "'"� APR 17 1989 2764K DATE: April 14, 1989 Weld Co. Planning Commission TO: Wally Jacobson - District IV FROM: Bob Tenney, Traffic Supervisor SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Study for I-25 Subdivision I have reviewed the Traffic Study you sent and in general is very reasonable as far as trip generation, trip distribution and overall methodology are concerned. I did find a few mathematical errors in the actual numbers of the distribution of site-generated trips but they were minor. However, the turning movements associated with total peak hour traffic for Phase 1 and Phase 2 do not appear to balance across any of the intersections displayed. Whether I am misinterpreting the volumes or whether errors were made when combining this data with that of Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig, I cannot say for sure. Thus, it is hard to say which traffic movements are in error without a greater in-depth analysis than I was able to perform. Your concern with the level of service analysis is understandable because the information is presented for each intersection as a Whole and not by individual approach. I tried to reproduce the level of service analysis using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual software package but I was unable to do so. I cannot say for sure that the analysis was done using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. When attempting to verify the level of service analysis, I looked at the AM peak hour worksheets for the Turner Rd. intersection for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. For both cases I obtained levels of service of C or better on all approaches. However, I am concerned that the westbound left turn bay does not have adequate storage capacity. I recommend that the turning movements for the three intersections in the project area be corrected and a level of service analysis be done for each individual intersection and also as a group. Let me know if you wish me to do any more work on this project. cc: Greg Fulton Robert Tenney File 89/1425A 891002 • SPEED MEMO IF) C'S T. 4 "y, COLORADO DIVISION OF I ICHWAY `€ L-7 %' 1 WELD CO. -I-25 I-25 SUBDIVISION MP. 240+1- DATE : APRIL 6, 1989 TO: WALLY JACOBSON, D-4 (PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL) SUBJECT: I-25 SUBDIVISION DRAINAGE REPORT REVIEW THE HYDRAULIC' S UNIT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE REPORT FOR I-25 SUBDIVISION AT DEL CAMINO BY EDWARD LIND . JR. OUR COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOW: 1- THE RATIONAL METHOD IS APPLICABLE FOR URBAN AREAS WITH DRAINAGE BASIN SMALLER THAN 160 ACRES . 2- WHAT IS THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION FOR THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ? SHOW THE CALCULATIONS . 3- PER CDOH DESIGN MANUAL SECTION 802 . 4A THE DESIGN FREQUENCY FOR INTERSTATE IN RURAL AREA IS 50-YEAR AND FOR URBAN AREAS IS 100-YEAR. 4- FROM THE TOPOMAP OF THE BASIN IT LOOKS LIKE THE HISTORIC ` FLOW SHOULD FLOW TOWARD NORTH AND AWAY FROM INTERSTATE 25. THE TWO DITCHES , RURAL DITCH AT THE NORTH AND AN UNNAME 4DITCH AT THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE EXISTING BASIN HAS CHANGED THE NATURAL FLOW PATTERN AND SOMEHOW DIVERTED THE FLOW TOWARD I-25 . 5- THE DETENTION POND SHOWN IN FIGURE 1 SHOULD NOT USE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) FOR PRIVATE BENEFIT. 6- THE SKETCH IN FIGURE 3 IS SHOWN OUT OF PROPORTION , 30 INCH PIPE IS SHOWN SMALLER THAN 24 INCH HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BERM. 44 Y0? 7- THE DETENTION PONDS CALCULATIONS AND GRADING PLANS ARE NEEDED FOR THE FINAL REVIEW. RELEASE RATE FROM THESE PONDS k , SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN HISTORIC FLOW. FOR DETAIL ANALYSIS SITE INSPECTION OF THE BASIN IS NEEDED . ' PLEASE INCORPORATE THE ABOVE COMMENTS WITH YOURS WHEN SENDING 4; THEM TO THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL US AT (303) 757-9343 . FROM: A. MOMMANDI , HYDRAULICS 8910 -2 XC : File +<< MEMORAnDU �i Rod Allison, Planning May 23, 89 To Date Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer COLORADO From Harold Reese, Z-449 Subject: I have reviewed the preliminary traffic study for the I-25 Subdivision at Del Camino submitted by Matthew J. Delich. For the most part, I agree with Mr. Delich's report. He indicates Turner Boulevard must be extended to the south, and will provide 85% to 95% of the access to the proposed development. He also estimates that at build-out, the development will generate 13,500 vehicle trips on an average weekday. Currently, Turner Boulevard has approximately 7,000 vehicles per day, and there are major congestion problems at the intersection of State Highway 119 and Turner Boulevard. The additional traffic generated by the development will create a totally unacceptable situation. The report indicates that improvements are needed on State Highway 119. I do not agree that Turner Boulevard, in itself, is acceptable access to the proposed development. The same opinion is reflected by the Colorado Department of Highways in their letter dated May 19, 1989. Mr. Delich indicates, and I agree, the study to be performed by the Colorado Department of Highways is very important when considering traffic flow in the area. However, I do not agree that addressing long-range needs is not appropriate. If we do not address long-range needs, Weld County will end up with another bad traffic situation, similar to what we are looking at on Turner Boulevard today. Also, the applicant still has not indicated how improvements are to be financed. I do not think the applicant has met the requirement of Section 28.8.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance which requires demonstration that the highway facilities are adequate. DLS/mw:prr ! [1AY 2 4 1989 J Ll �xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Harold Reese, Z-449 *Id co. Nauucz litounuo 891002 / 6 mEm®RAnDum WilkTo Rod Allison. Planning oalarch /31, 1989 COLORADO From Drew Scheltinga, County Engineer 1 1t Subject. Harold Reese, Jr. , Z-449 We are all aware, access to the proposed development is a major problem. Section 28.8.8 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance requires that at the change of zone to a P.U.D. District, if the street or highway facilities are not adequate, the applicant is to supply information demonstrating willingness and financial capability to upgrade the streets or highways. Also, it is clear that the applicant may be responsible for off-site road improvements. In the application materials, the applicant has pointed out the problems with access, and indicated they would be willing to participate in reasonable improvements. The applicant must supply information showing what the improvements need to be. Also, they must indicate what the costs would be. Detailed plans and cost estimates are not necessary at the change of zone. However, knowing information such as where and how far roads need to be extended, the number of lanes, and need for turn lanes, are essential. Also, the applicant must address how these improvements are to be financed. As I have pointed out several times in the past, it is simply shortsided not to address the completion of the one-half mile of Frontage Road along I-25. That incompleted link is essential to transportation throughout the area. Simply saying alternate routes or the extension of Turner Boulevard will become the interstate access road, simply begs the problem. If the outer road extension is not constructed at this time, making a right-of-way dedication and planning for its eventual construction, is very important. The section on drainage in the applicant materials gives a schematic description of how drainage could be handled. I do not have any objection to the plan as proposed. However, a detailed Master Drainage Plan for the entire site should be required as a part of the approval for the first P.U.D. filing. All subsequent P.U.D. filings should be required to be designed in accordance with the Master Drainage Plan. DLS/mw:prr xc: Commissioner Lacy Planning Referral File - Harold Reese Jr. , USR-449 APR A 1989 . 891®02 Held Co. Plamails balUMi sjun ,�{• DEPAR ,�NT OF PLANNING SERVICES ( PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 1` 915 10th STREET !� t GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 D f 07 &Ij ,„ Mk 2 / 1989 1111111 J! L 9 COLORADO g,; ,rN VA0Z jF\G-(00. �HG110y� Longmont Rural Fire Protection District Mr. Bill Emerson 9119 County Line Road Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: Amendment to application materials for case number Z-449. Enclosed is an amendment to the application materials submitted by Harold Reese, Jr. , for a change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to a Planned Unit Development. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE4 of Section 10 and part of the YEa of Section 14 all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land is west of I-25 and approximately 1/2 mile south of Colorado Highway 119. This amendment to the application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by July 20, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. )(K We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. — 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prier to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 7 e n,o r Fina 7Fc Ti, p,sie,ci Signed: z/1'6)12..-92C0- Agency: o., p ?In,ry rNifA - r/ec ,PACAJMC �1.®f1�2 /7 o,.cy ilc97 8 �.14' Op 4"/ \\\111724"z DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OMAHA DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS ROCKY MOUNTAIN AREA tiz.Ic-<...Sl�e`° 2860 S. CIRCLE DRSUITE GL 10 a'Tafs os r�' COLORADO SPRINGS. COLORADO 80906-4188 REPLY TO ATTENTION of April 4, 1989 Platte River Resident Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 9307 State Highway 121 Littleton, Colorado 80123-6901 01-211. I Rod Allison ( Department of Planning Services APR 6 1989 915 Tenth Street, Room 342 Greeley, Colorado 80631 it rlfl L`U. l'f:rfi.]IYyy aLL41111t i`-'LLu Dear Mr. Allison: it Reference is made to proposed development I-25 Subdivision, Case Number Z-449, located at SEA, Section 10 and part of the NE1 of Section 15, all in T-2-N, R-68-W, Weld County, Colorado, adjacent to the west side of I-25. During an October 14, 1988 site inspection conducted by me, it was found that wetlands exist on this parcel of land. See attached copy of your map showing the approximate location of wetlands. As you know, the Corps of Engineers has Regulatory jurisdiction over waters of the United States which include adjacent and isolated Wetlands, pursuant to the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33USC1344). Under this act, prior authorization is required from the Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged or fill material riverward of the ordinary high water mark of waters of the United States and into wetlands. This Regulatory jurisdiction is administered under Federal Regulation 33 CFR 320-330. Please find the enclosed Department of the Army (DA) Permit application material. If an activity includes the filling or partial filling of the Wetlands located at the project site, please fill out and send to this office the application which shall include a mapped area of the existing wetland, and proposed acres of fill. Also find inclosed a list of Wetland Specialists who may assist in your wetland determination. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact this office or call Terry McKee at 303/979-4120 or 4121. Sincerely, Terry McKee Environmental Resource Specialist cf: Permit Files 891002 Omaha Permits Br I' n l ,i U �\. - - M \ \ \\ \ Q \\ y` \\\` \l '\ U 12. 3\ _A' \\ \\ o v \ Jo-- \�\\\\\\ — / ''''' -. \\\\ -.r---_� S o :\:\N \\ -- / 7 " \ I �I \ \ \• . \\ i ____..---kN\ \ \ VI 891002 In a a mEmoRAnDum Win Weld County Planning October 21, 1988 To Date COLORADO From Health Protection Services a, , J/7� Case Number S-292/ Name: Reese, Harold Subject: Health Protection Services has reviewed this proposal and recommends for 1 approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. All liquid and solid wastes, shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. - 2. Any required Emissions Permits are obtained from the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health. 3. Any food service facilities shall be constructed, licensed, and operated in compliance with the Rules and Regulations Governing the Sanitation of Food Service Establishments in the State of Colorado. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the commercial limit of 60db(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statues. - 6. The Division requires that this facility utilize the existing St. Vrain municipal sewer treatment system. HPS/dgc 891®C2 qt—hl�(�:C�7r��' �oF.co� ‘."7--.4411_09.) It"; N o`, WE-89-0009 ROY R. ROM ER * JOHN W. BOLD GOVERNOR r n, *. DIRECTOR X876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING- 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)866-2611 March 29, 1989 Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Gentlemen: RE: I-25 SUBDIVISION At your request and in accordance with S.B. 35 we have reviewed the materials submitted for and made a field inspection on March 28, 1989, of the site of the proposed subdivision referenced above. Most of our most serious concerns about this proposal are addressed in the accompanying reports. However, some geology-related conditions of the site are potentially very adverse if not addressed adequately and deserve additional emphasis. 1 ) Both in the proposed subdivision area and adjacent properties, including the developed area immediately to the north, drainage is very poor. A detailed drainage plan which includes effects of development of the subject property and in turn on adjacent properties should be made early in the development process. The proposal to construct a 5-acre pond (lake) to retain storm runoff near the northeast corner of the site appears to be sound, but its effects on seasonal water-table level in the immediate vicinity have not been adequately evaluated. The irrigation ditches in the immediate vicinity undoubtedly cause similar water-table changes. 2) A soils, and subsequently prior to construction, soils and foundation investigation (for each structure) should be undertaken to ensure that construction practices adequately address soil conditions. From field observations it is highly likely that specialized foundation designs will be necessary for many types of commercial buildings. Ground-moisture conditions indicated in (1 ) will have to be evaluated prior to foundation designs as well as for the reasons indicated above (Also see comments on p. 4 of the Lind drainage report accompanying the application. ). GEOLOGY 891002 STORY OF THE PAST... KEY TO THE FUTURE `Ipe Gentl emen Page two March 29, 1989 If these recommendations and those made in the drainage report accompanying the application are followed and made a condition of approval of it, we have no geology-related objection. Sincerely, James M. Soule `'Engineering Geologist vjr:JMS-89-037 4417/10 �� hi MAR 3 1 1989 Vf ugh-, „ 891002 WELD COUNTY` i-IERIFF 'S OFFICE SHERIFF GREELEY, CO 8O631. l00 � .ET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 O , , , ; , � _� UMBER Z-449 COLORADO n I % March 20, 1989 MAR 2 •, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: TiUld Cn. Plan;un umtntSStuu Enclosed is an application from Harold Reese, Jr. , c/o McCarty Engineering Consultants for a change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) . to Planned Unit Development. The parcel of land is described as part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, T2N,a R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of 1-25 and south of Colorado Highway 119. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 3, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. _ We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. S We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. /qc ?e a- y/9 /oiler 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. P ea a refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: g £ency: WELD ( cp, S efj%j Date: cR 891002 OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF MEMORANDUM TO Planning FROM FA .Tnrdan DATE 101488 RE Site Security and Facility Protection This proposal is focused on industrial and commercial development that does not lend itself to formation of a law enforcement authority as a means to address those costs. We are recommending that the covenants for the project be amended to include information to the effect that site security and facility protection will be provided through private security arranged and compensated by the property owners association. The Weld County Sheriff will respond to provide service only as required to investigate a crime. Random area patrol, general area and facility security are not the responsiblity of the Weld County Sheriff according to the Colorado Revised Statutes. We do not have the resources necessary to provide other than what I have described for facilities of this type. I realize that enforcement of covenants makes this requirement difficult to implement. However, having the role of the Sheriff's Office made clear in such a manner will hopefully inform property owners of their responsibilities at the time of purchase. 891002 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,y� / ,, ,g2, PLANNING DIVISION CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX ` Air LONGMONT, CO 80501 (303)651-8330 March 23, 1989 Mr. Rod Allison, Principal Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number Z-449 Dear Mr. Allison: Thank you for sending to the City of Longmont for our review the Change of Zone application for the I-25 Subdivision PUD. This 132 acre proposed development is located at Del Camino west of I-25 and south of SH119. The City of Longmont previously commented on the Sketch Plan for this project; a copy of our previous comments is attached. The City notes that the Change of Zone application addresses several of the City' s previous concerns. Landscaping along the perimeter of the site has been expanded, living ground cover will be planted between trees and shrubs, and there will be covenants specifying lot-by-lot landscaping. We look forward to seeing the detailing of this landscaping concept, intended "to tie the park together as a whole," at the next stage of Weld County' s PUD process. The application indicates that a property owner's association will maintain the 5 acre lake and any other on-site amenities for the enjoyment of employees/visitors to the development. The narrative also states that uses needing outside storage will be located along the western edge of the site, and it will be screened and landscaped. Both address issues which were ones raised in the City' s previous letter concerning this project. Transportation is the one issue which still remains a concern to the City of Longmont. The development and protection of a well-functioning transportation system in the vicinity of the I-25/SH119 interchange is a key component to our communities ' respective economic development efforts. We note that the Traffic Study does not recommend that any off-site improvements need to be constructed to handle the traffic from this project (which could have up to 1.5 million square feet of commercial and industrial space) . While the Traffic Study indicates that levels of service D and E are projected, it does not indicate what specific measures need to be taken to upgrade these levels of service and mitigate the traffic impacts from this development. 591002 -,7Aes✓✓ '-ay G �..t,:. .y,.,cn�-.x.-, .f,x.?�^,�' '. "". .. 1sr?".'. 2 "rnY?`�''' '"',t!c Z :: 'A The City of Longmont respectfully requests that during this review process, the Traffic Study be revised so it is clear (1) what street improvements (both on-site and off-site) need to be constructed to mitigate the traffic impacts from this development, (2) when they need to be in place relative to the phasing of actual development, (3) who is responsible for their financing, and (4) what mechanisms are required to ensure these improvements are constructed when needed to handle this development's traffic impacts. The City of Longmont supports the conversion of the I-25 southbound on-ramp from two-way traffic to one-way traffic, and the extension of Turner Boulevard south to WCR20§: two measures of many that will need to be made to handle the intensely urban development planned in Del Camino. The City would like to reiterate its previous comment that Turner Boulevard be a public street from the outset, and that curb, gutter, and sidewalk be installed for a project which estimates up to 5000 employees. Finally, the City would like to encourage Weld County to consider undertaking a Master Transportation Study for the entire I-25 Mixed Use Development Area. Such an overview may assist the County in evaluating the relative importance of ensuring the construction of various transportation links in the area relative to the timing of its development. Again thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions please call either Froda Greenberg of me at 651-8330. Sincerely, Marta Bromschwig, AICP Planning Director MB/cr xc: Phil Del Vecchio, Community Development Director Sue Reed, Transportation Planner #2050-10a cif l , APR 3 1989 1 weia C 891002 /t DEPARR NT OF PLANNING SERVICES Ced .the g PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 /yi 915 10th STREET frit GREELEY,COLORADO 80631, :11;:;;• O CASE NUMBER Z-449 COLORADO March 20, 1989 I'� APR d 1989 , TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: taut Cu. Pka:';i .;utcaiiSdo Enclosed is an application from Harold Reese, Jr. , c/o McCarty Engineering Consultants for a change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development. The parcel of land is described as part of the SEi of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, T2N,a R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of I-25 and south of Colorado Highway 119. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 3, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. XXX We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests., as regards zone change. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 891002 Signed: S}7 ,e4,L — Emn.e=.on/ Agency: LONC!i70NT nit PROTECTION swsr .1 9119 COUNTY WE ROAD Date: A A1AAI %E r/ LONG✓dOPR; COLORADO 80501 DEPAR, '\z NT OF PLANNING SERVICES o (` PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 Ott \\\ 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 i O CASE NUMBER Z-449 COLORADO March 20, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Harold Reese, Jr. , c/o McCarty Engineering Consultants for a change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to Planned Unit Development. The parcel of land is described as part of the SEi of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, T2N,a R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of I-25 and south of Colorado Highway 119. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 3, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 07 i 1 n �2 We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request ' ' `�- (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: :GI } r 1 X We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: Cfm,;iQ . Spdvi Agency: Longmont Soil Conservation District Date: March 23, 1989 891002 ¢ DEPARTK NT OF PLANNING SERVICES 6 PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET AIIPR GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 If CASE NUMBER Z-449 COLORADO uPR 1 0 1989 Li March 20, 1989 weld Cn. Plaa mttt uamtNSSiUh TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Harold Reese, Jr. , c/o McCarty Engineering Consultants for a change of zone from A (Agricultural) and C-S (commercial) to Planned Unit Development . The parcel of land is described as part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, T2N,a R68W of the 6th P .M. , Well County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is west of 1-25 and south of Colorado Highway 119 . This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by April 3, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Rod Allison, Principal Planner, if you have any questions about this referral. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1 . We have reviewed this request and find that the request (does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2 . 1e do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. XX We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed. ` _ e (7/7.121,1).___ Agency: Tri-Area Plan nine Comm;sc;on Secretary Date: 4/6/89 891092 FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: 2 - 44 9 DATE OF INSPECTION: 4— / - g� NAME: f) c2 r o L C, RE) e V V - REQUEST: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: sna\j e J' £ �fci� Let ≥ ftf� SccY o h . T E a�� e- ' cam' --t-L,€ t-+" • LAND USE: N ant-et vfl ret L E d ZONING: N LOCATION: IAJe—c — ,, —G5 C3, vtel E ` (2'� W Al1A c ut l—( QQ 4 ru ( _ COMMENTS: Gw' L. P 'We-3T; S ° ergr \ / T,77,7701 APR z, 1989 i� BY' L 't=ivrt 8910C2 HAROLD REESE, JR. Z-449 Page 1 Mountain Empire Dairymen's Assoc. A Colorado Corporation 12450 Washington Street Thornton, CO 80241 Mustard and Associates El Rancho P.O. Box 53 Golden, CO 80501 Helen Susuras P.O. Box 84 Dacono, CO 80514 Donald J. Sherwood 120 9th Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 C. Richard and Mary J. Dalton P.O. Box 36 Newark, MO 63458 River Valley Mobile Home Park 3294 Highway 119 Longmont, CO 80501 Phillip E. Camenisch 10504 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Harold Reese, Jr. Ronald L. & Christine R. McCulloch 855 Sunrise Highway Lynbrook, NY 11563 Grant Brothers Box 948 Longmont, CO 80501 Fifthcoff Company 436 Coffman Street Longmont, CO 80501 The Rawlins National Bank P.O. Box 100 Rawlins, WY 82301 891002 C HAROLD REESE, JR. Z-449 Page 2 Flatiron Structures Company 10090 I-25 Frontage Road Longmont, CO 80501 Azalea Farms, Limited c/o Edwin C. McDowell, Jr. 4862 Kellogg Circle Boulder, CO 80303 Carl R. Oswald-Trust 14707 North 95th Street Longmont, CO 80501 Frank S. Bigelow Del Camino Center Partnership Edwin S. Kanemoto Kenneth Kanemoto David G. Neenan James J. Heenan 203 South Main Street Longmont, CO 80501 James T. & Carolyn Sue Westervelt 9536 I-25 Access Road E Longmont, CO 80501 Herbert M. Olander 250 River Loop #1 Eugene, Ore 97404 Daryl E. and Donna G. Kuehn 3909 Weld County Road 20} Longmont, CO 80501 Sam and Jimmie Joan Angleo 3711 Weld County Road 20} Longmont, CO 80501 Marvin D. and Sharon K. Hopper Verner A. and Adelyn D. Johnson 3656 Weld County Road 20} Longmont, CO 80501 Rodney R. and M. Ernestine McDaniel 9762 I-25 Access Road E Longmont, CO 80501 891002 O HAROLD REESE, JR. Z-449 Page 3 Frederick H. & Lynda Tripp Griffin 9748 I-25 Access Road E Longmont, CO 80501 Larry L. & Regina K. McBrien 9518 I-25 Access Road Longmont, CO 80501 Herbert M. Olander 250 River Loop 4n Eugene, ORE 97404 891002 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO County of Weld ss. I A.Winkler Riesel of said County of Weld being duly sworn,say that I am publisher of PLATTEVILLE HERALD that, the same is a weekly newspaper of general circulation was printed and published in the town of PLATTEVILLE 989 . N-3 In said county and state that the notice of advertisement,of which ', the annexed is a true copy has been published in said weekly NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING newspaper for The Wald Count Planning Commission/}') was hold a WMk hearing on Tuesday, ( � consecutive weeks: April 18.1989,at 1:30 p.m.for the pur- that the notice was published In the regular and entire issue of every Development ok f cot considering aria a Ch Specific W number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication rage of said notice and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 thereof:that the first publication of said notice was contained in the (Commercial)M Planned Unit Develop- ment for the property described below. issue of said n per bearing the date of Approval of the request mar neater s 1/4.-------) vested property right pursuant to Col- ,/t A.D.,19 and the last publication evade Law. th�reofl in the Issue of d newspsAZ bracing date, APPLICANT:M.__ o._"_ k LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Part of the 5EM the � pL/ day f of Section 10 and part of the NEV.of //1/ Section IS,all In T2N,R68W of the 6th � 1 that the said P.M.,Weld County,Colorado j I) TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: A Change of Zone from A PLATTEVILLE HERALD (Agricultural)and C-3(Commercial)to Manned UM!Development. has been published continuously and uninterruptedly during the LOCATION:West of I-25 and south of period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first Colorado Highway 119. issue thereof containing said notice or advertisement above referred SIZE:132 acres,more or less to: and that said newspaper was at the time of each of the The public hearing will be held in the publicationsof said notice duly qualified for that purpose within the Weld County Commissioners, Hearing meaning of an act entitled. "An Act Concerning Legal Notices. Room,First Floor,Weld County Centers Advertisements and Publications and the Fees of Printers and nisi Canter,915 Tenth Street,Greeley. Publishers thereof, and to Repeal all Acts and Parts of Acts in Colorado. Comments or objections Conflict with the Provisions of th t"approved Ari 1921.and - related to the above request should be all ebdm to thereof, and p y 4 ended by an ac submitted in writing to the Weld County a and a y 13. 931. Department of Pinning Services,915 �7(��7'�, Tenth Street,Room 342,Greeley,Col- ///_,j /, oratlo pu the above date or '.... ///lll...11l�il/iC.-Y�C/ f Publisher 18,1989. at the public hearing on April OOO,,r Copies of the application are available glx” 1—/ day f for WMk Inspection in the Department SII se an sworn to before me this / Y o of Planning Services,Room 342,Weld if. ,L, `L,T1 19Y7 County Centennial Center,915 Tenth / Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 - C ,^��fff��,��r Phone lido son, Extension 4400. ,)7 _""-I Bud Nalldorwn,Chairman oNotary Public Weld County PlanningEat Commission 4 1 5 DENVER AVENUE Published in the Platteville Herald March 29,1989. FT. LUPTON, CO 80621 My commission expires June 1992 . n ot,ires vf.:' 30,1C92 r ( APR 3 1989 I Weld Cu. Plapoint .. Wilk i, 891002 \tit DEPARTN _�' OF PLANNING SERVICES ( PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET ot \ GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 wink COLORADO March 20, 1989 John McCarty McCarty Engineering Consultants 2229 Jewel Street Longmont, CO 80501 Re: Z-449 - Request for a Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) and C-3 (Commercial) to a Planned Unit Development on a parcel of land described as part of the SE} of Section 10 and part of the NE} of Section 15, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. McCarty: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 18, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. _ It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Tri-Area Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call Rebecca Marker at 833-2075 for further details regarding the date, time and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Tri-Area Planning Commission Meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. It is the responsibility of an applicant to see that a sign is posted on the property under consideration at least ten (10) days preceding the hearing date. Sometime prior to April 7, 1989, you or a representative should call me to obtain a sign to be posted on the site no later than April 8, 1989. 891002 John McCarty Z-449 Page 2 The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of an applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respect / Respectfully, Rod Allison Principal Planner RA:dn 891002 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET NAME: Eldred M. Johnson ADDRESS: 2313 8th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W§ of the NE} of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent to the City of Greeley; south of U.S. Highway 34, east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 SIZE OF PARCEL: 78 Acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The criteria for review of this proposal is listed in Section 21.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any specific recommendations from referral agencies. The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received any objections from surrounding property owners. 891002 • O jThHL.IIIIIPAMC .cua.°i; , p SOOr,,,fq !• x• Ixr .1 we L r, II\ rte` LL I ) 24 I WINE- .,,,,,,.. _..., . ,i .,P".Qn;tirpit at ,••Ill p I , • Per: MUI 11 z..f t 5..ti �� a� •,.1• &I ON „am riaralaff7A xii�� ,...,, 1. .. ,WAL AI-ILI11Mi1fr ,) uurf u l , - 1./ Si I I ai>ia �°aw -/ r I I ��: 'Correction CI ; P4 �iir „As _ ©�r / 1'-r.-+n--� Nortliall: �_ _ _ _ MI•_ • h�J� sd- tour •�p�_ ENN a iv5aLLELol" i Er � I ap re'•A FiCo _,;- ll M▪ L SAN i 0 3 1 • T II rig iThEl/RA‘ POP Tar • 4 -1. I Li el 3 [.. ni- - I • % 1"Ill C'• Wrir . 'I , II : • • ' •' •O.. i k, 1 x at a°, NM a .. � lliiII— No i _ ii • a r yes .. • • }f\ I . , ,•••{ i . .I.. i ,,m • n � u � I • i :Eli.,,... , ei .• •• • •• . _tit _ iik.:45:7 / .. ._• ., •, a• as r... vi •I ?1�.',x• nI I x• • 6' n zr•• ! .. )° I _ i I sasI 8 mum I. I ' Fa " ( •••. ‘ . • .PI il • ' i ..,,, al! , T-Illig i II . : : i._ ,....... .. a- , . ....., . , via, , • , , . , . . /, _ I • _ _ I ill ion__ _ _ _N_ _ _ �l • I n \ • xz T I -.O.- z• a zoC114SI, ` v r L.TTEVILLE _ Aron •u x, i ,�,�1•? xa • x•` I x. I IS M IIIx• I • ,ME11,,,,1 4 I i 52 13 I I o • s • a • • V • �l 1.3 \' 455 .1 I ° RING ,„ .-,---,------------\ ra es iG �eI P 464 _ _ _46431 I / ��i d. Ix� N mini}it I ill- �..` {.. ..1. 1 • o a . 4545. C =l ;�& -- 1 � � �iV tl A • 1 1 li °u c v1 �°II• 7 1 + - err l` %II. T „ A t ° q4i4/ i 46/9 ry r . . N rl .ti '.9 4844 :fFfi/f5 y of l—_)L rl _Sil I .q .3 1 ° I— r)C0 5chI - L Ik l y 5 4662_.—_`— _ _°• _ 16°• 464)1 , :� �`'rael P15 �/ \.... z5��= • f // 4690 It ) . in..,.. 1 LSq� \ t ti .. r � �• � O /4 u6 Era EIA4HIW M A II 1 ._ tc'_ a m P E p62o �- / �1I I "aM J T T ��- 1 ryx IL.i� is- 1 a = Er y6�--'_ ry �' s Ali Hm3 orc.r do p Garden I a`( .Wr, a a j I 341 _/� �. TTi I c I'•Il• C 1 / 1 \/ 46 % a / C / r� / r.+ `J�"j� I lv�t- % 0VP •SCR` _ y � V / 0 /7� /I / �� .•i ?� 630 22 4642 r 0 x465/ 1464/ 9p { 7;I ------ ,,, 0 Ii 4650 jjj / - �....',, 6� II 463] 44 • Talley ((�I SC ▪ ( '��/ I . 42 Park I� _T ..� -_ __� / Y _ _ - '4645 j ` K t. ,� I -i8c.� 4650 -i— - _ _ -- _. .yam •°' • ' r II I��p Il I .1 ' ° �so . o A n Eva.Evans sp 1 A 1 I S J_▪ � 29 - •X4662 ° 27 14649 1 I v4655N'.o° / -. /95 _., III I I A , p TCN _ _ /i.. 1 \v 4660 '..53 / U tINrON �1 x.555 UI /f C I ' RI ... . . 4649 LAT 4659 455 ' to , I 4662 i , 46-4 - 6p G 465 - - el Or 1 46 184prF 11 46J0 L JNrON / !I O�� 0 j 1 i BM .32 �- - j :064 33 - '1 _ r 34 i I i ,,„!----,,I... . -$2..--- l AI � I . ' • :I 'l.''''if : 1. .::.1 ._ : . , :rn,\‘'.:44.4:::t1;;raCkts.:;:-P::::;.:11;;;;t:;‘.1°' '' .:::::1;111,1(;:.::t1C1 /I::: l ;"_dam- •N F! �e�etr 1� A Setti, • d s.w :.- ."‘""— ‘• \ � �+1,xN\� ...)1"�\ /- ;PM , / �6eva a �G -L.•- g ry - 3411 Ar. \}1. • [ ppp r‘r,_ . 2.:,, , , ,, ..., , i . _ ., . /.; ,..„,.., , ,,, A .,-kg.4', 4g;*-.i . IS � � �n'r, r,;7. ,r.O. ,_11''''.: / ..:. ,.. . , ,e s -$i;1m.e'+ W`,'? .4;<:* It '3 a AI s L.` f-.. :::: a�'� � � • '�'.I.•^� ,1-k. F f r t .Y�+ \ moo )4,0M y�tact E stft ; ` f a \�-�� tee+r ( tact +�' j 4 Ye` 'Y .� f�.lr ry ,. • 1 �T F F f'^L h��l. TT ; - k .nr' .rT'i 'ir2 °d : r-`j4 v.< r "jilt rAir Y� a ` , Ir' y, v q w �� ,•4'. v.--.. K� L�{ /. • ' ,• .t i r"" 'Y ,xy,xr.{�, 5 .�`'t_,'?•it _ ,a. 1.. • `. , .,, w , r f : ,, _ w11 f r,.:4 '° +rk X1+2 9 I s �'t�'� * �' ' '�1 ...;--,Az:t. " ` '►a * ' Sit fit yF t,, ' ' y' _. �. \�1•.mss . "7 s�. wr �° ,, . .2,..i.'11. h2+"� �` k;, ..�. L L; FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Z-450 DATE OF INSPECTION: July 12, 1989 NAME: Eldred M. Johnson REQUEST: A Change of Zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W} NEi of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Adjacent to the City of Greeley; south of U.S. Highway 34 and east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 LAND USE: N U.S. Highway 34, recreational facility E Farmland S Farmland, river—bottom W Farmland ZONING: N R-1 (Single Family) E Agricultural S Agricultural W R-1 (Single Family) COMMENTS: Access to the property is from U.S. Highway 34, a paved road having a principal arterial classification. The property is being used for agricultural production (alfalfa and native grass) . Drainage is to the south, towards the South Platte River which is on the southern property boundary. An oil and gas production facility is located in the northeast quarter of this property. By: e C i(rtP1 nner �� 891002 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Eldred Johnson CASE NUMBER: Z-450 REFERRALS SENT: June 27, 1989 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: July 11, 1989 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault X Health Department Brighton Extension Service Dacono Emergency Management Office Eaton Sheriff's Office Erie X Engineering _X_Evans Housing Authority Firestone Airport Authority Fort Lupton Building Inspection Frederick X Garden City STATE _Gilcrest Division of Water Resources XGreeley _Geological Survey _Grover Department of Health Hudson X Highway Department Johnstown Historical Society Keenesburg Water Conservation Board Kersey Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _La Salle Lochbuie FIRE DISTRICTS Longmont Ault F-1 Mead _Berthoud F-2 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer Dacono F-19 Nunn _Eaton F-4 Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 __Windsor _Hudson F-7 _Johnstown F-8 COUNTIES La Salle F-9 Adams _Longmont F-10 Boulder _Milliken F-11 Larimer _Nunn F-12 Pawnee _Platteville F-13 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Platte Valley F-14 _US Army Corp of Engineers Poudre Valley F-15 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service _Raymer Federal Aviation Administration Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Communication Commission Windsor/Severance F-17 Wiggins F-18 X Western Hills F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS _Brighton OTHER Fort Collins _Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. X Greeley _Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Longmont Tri-Area Planning Commission West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Ann Garrison 891002 FIELD CHECK Filing Number: Z-450 Date of Inspection: t /c; 7 0 Applicant's Name: Eldred M. Johnson Request: Change cf Zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) zone district. Legal Description: Part of the W§ NE$ of Section 21 , T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Adjacent to the City of Greeley, south of State Highway 34 Bypass, and east of f1 First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 . // Land Use: N (iGlr,CCa/kU2R./ d s_! `4, _, Gc2_v W f / Zoning: N C-4 (Commercial) E I-1 (Industrial) and A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W R-1 (Residential) `2 // /St(20-6 a COMMENTS: / �,,�/v�e6 -SILL) "° -L �� S% is c _ A2.1 ,�' thL-GCJ /7:4-60 'S /J ,, r - _tz / l0yL. - <.vr,(,!°t ila .--tea- vzeiR hai 1/4--fi,d- _Y1,__ )-n l< e , - -,J G/1,';(' (./st,U ( P.I ZE , isidal ot.--? Soto_ ; A ✓ 1989 i awn iY /�/L/ZA Signature o Board Member .1 mitt, ,v.,,;,,.., ,,.,,mmssf°p 891002 DEPARfl "T OF PLANNING SERVICES 9 (7-- _ (� l FLI� HI LT 11JUf, p {��f"t� ` :.i WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING Ii Zhlllc: ;:[NB :OEf='T T c Jy 933 N. 11TH H AVENUE t c ,uN , `,� 1999 i..._t 'r „ :. • CASE NUMBER Z-450 ' 111r_„__, I Ny s�� COLORADO JUL 13 1989 1 June 27, 1989 U WEld Co. Pleuruut 'omnns:�w, TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Eldred M. Johnson for a change of zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the W? NE4 of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, south of State Highway 34 Bypass, and east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by July 11 , 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our CA) ` ,'�\` interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. �� Signed: ki y, Agency: al'�Lb1/�'91/M e-y Date: i 891002 UNITED STATES 4+302 West 9th Street Road DEPARTMENT OF Soil Conservation Service Greeley, Colorado 00634 AGRICULTURE Greeley Field Office (303) 356-6506 June 6, 1989 Milton Baumgartner, Pres. West Greeley Soil Conservation District P. O. Box ;6 Greeley, CO 0(,6x2 Weld County Case Number : :'_-450 RE: Eldred M. Johnson for a change of zone from I—i ( Industrial to A (Agricultural ) nonce district. Dear Mr. Baumgartner : e • e� ei the above request, and can find no conflicts have reviewed _I-��. with District interests. �;: ri' cerel�a, '''',.....„,e'r') ' f -I-zo-e/6(121--e/K Ronald D. Miller District Conservationist Greeley Field Office 891002 DEPART' 'T OF PLANNING SERVICES . I-- CFI V70 11 5,i'.. .,M.' , C;!,LICH WELD COUNTY HEALTH DLPAkTt4EPlrT t FE 'F 1"1"Fai ROAD n l fJ ' f_.. Y ( :O80631 Ot lc 101 JUN °81`i J 13 . i..1-1I. CASE N R74 1y y _., I r jr Lil l'-r.. .-7�, L COLORADO '�r` I JUL 1 3 1989 It June 27, 1989 Weld Co, Phnom ,uooizz1w TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Eldred M. Johnson for a change of zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the Wa NEI; of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, south of State Highway 34 Bypass, and east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by July 11, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate bo:zes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Ple fer to the enclosed le ter. Signed: Agency: /Je: , 0,411—- Dace: _ 891002 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET ITEM: Weld County Referral PROJECT: Rezoning from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) APPLICANT: Eldred M. Johnson LOCATION: South of State Highway 34 Bypass and east of 1st Avenue PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: July 11, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION FUNCTION: To recommend to the Weld County Planning Commission on development conformance with the City of Greeley's Comprehensive Plan PROJECT OVERVIEW: The area proposed for rezoning is 78 acres. PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. This property is located partially outside (approximately the southern one-third) of the City's Long Range Expected Growth Area and completely outside of the City's Mid Range Expected Service Area. 2 . It is the practice of the City Planning Commission to review County requests principally for their conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan policies. Specific design issues are addressed only to the degree necessary to ensure consistency with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the City's Zoning Code (in the event the proposal is within the City's Long Range Expected Growth Area. ) 3 . Common uses allowed by right in the Agricultural Zone include single family home, farming, ranching, gardening, cemetaries, oil and gas facilities, utility service facilities and animal boarding. 891002 7 Common uses allowed by right in the Industrial Zone include research, repair, manufacturing, assembly or storage within enclosed buildings. 4 . With the existing neighboring land uses being predominantly agricultural and industrial, there should not be any land use conflicts as a result of this request. 5. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan maps major costs are associated with providing access and water to this property. Considering the limited potential for the City to provide service to this area this rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6. This rezoning to agriculture is also consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that much of this area is within both the floodplain and within the area designated as important wildlife habitat. The uses allowed under the Agricultural Zone are generally more compatible with the floodplain and protection of wildlife habitat than are those uses allowed under the Industrial Zone. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend no objection to this Weld County Referral as proposed. 891002 1 DEPART`" 'T OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 915 10th STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 I CASE NUMBER Z- � COLORADO JUL989 June 27, 1989 tti, sot-4'O t'lt owillYI-' TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Eldred M. Johnson for a change of zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the W1 NEB of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, south of State Highway 34 Bypass, and east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by July 11 , 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. 2 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter.Signed: Agency:476n% disthAs._. 44- Date: �� 591002 DEPART'. ' T OF PLANNING SERVICES �t PHONE(303)356-4000 EXT.4400 \, 915 10th STREET tt to � GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 liDe 7Thc- CASE NUMBER Z-450 COLORADO j '` mil- 51989 June 27, 1989 trdo Co. Ptiuntn$ tn91inISsi0U TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Eldred M. Johnson for a change of zone from I-1 (Industrial) to A (Agricultural) zone district. The parcel of land is described as part of the W} NEl of Section 21, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is adjacent to the City of Greeley, south of State Highway 34 Bypass, and east of First Avenue or Weld County Road 41 . This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by July 11, 1989, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Brian J. Bingle, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. ✓ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed) uD LAgency :WESTERN HILLS FIRE PROTECGI�oNadQST■ T804 Cherry A �., Greeley, Date: 6ij9—&- 5 356-1424 891®(22 STATE OF COLORADO ) ;, ss. COUNTY OF WELD 1)av:r.d B. Reynolds, being duly sworn , says that he is publisher of the New News, ri weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County qtr;d has been c:ontirlously and uninterruptedly published therein , during tit period of at least fifty—two consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a newspaper within the meaning of the act of the General Assembly of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING State of Colorado, entitled "1-in Act The Weld County ylanning Commission will cona+ct a public of I re gulate et..ulate the printing t legal bearing on Tuesday, August 1, ' 1 1989, at 1:30 p.m. to review a notices and advertisements, " and request for approval of a change of wone from T-1 (1 1)district ft amendments thereto; that the notice Agricurom !and is�as t}The parcel of of which the annexed is a printed WK copy taken from said newspaper,-per, was NEv4 d 21 T5N,Row of p p N�4 8th pdo itiTeld County, Colorado, containing 75.016 acres published i n said newspapers and in more or less. The property is the regular Lt l a r and entire issue o f located adjacent to the City of a Greeley, south el State Hlghwa every number thereof , once a week 34 Bypass and east of list Avenue or Weld County Road 41. for 1 week ; that said notice was so The public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration published in said d newspape w s p p e proper of the above referenced request and not in p pe_me su any supplement thereof , will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioner's Hearing and that the first publication of Room, First Floor, Weld County r`3 o Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley. Colorado. s��i d n t7 t i C t a f r r e s a.i d , WJ as on the Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld 29th day of June, 1989, County Services, 915 Tenth Strreei Roos 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631 before the above date or presented and the last on the at the public hearing on August 1, Copies of the application are available for public inspec 2 ei day OA)l..U1 e, rvi Department of Planning I d`a', Room 342, Weld County I Centennial Center, 915 Tenth 1 Street,Greeley, Colorado,- Phone 1 356-4000,Extension 4400. Bud Halidorson Chairman Weld County Planning Commission t o be ublished in the New News __ Publyy1ed in The New News June 2),1989. Subscribed and swore to before me this d a y ot June, 1989. r. . . V((e2C4t-1 C.. 1-2/1- . — --- No ary Publ.ie 'f corrimi.ssit'•rl expires :-11-90 8910?2 ELDRED M. JOHNSON SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS SURROUNDING MINERAL OWNERS Z-450 Eldred M. Johnson 2313 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Amoco Production P.O. Box 39200 Denver, CO 80239 Basin Exploration Company 155 East Boardwalk Drive, Suite 300 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Pike Oil Company 410 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Norma L. , Norma J. , and Fred S. Grossaint 993 East 28th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Clifford G. Miller, et al. 3808 First Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Lorraine Annis, et al. P.O. Box 194 Firestone, CO 80520 State of Colorado Game, Fish, and Parks Commission 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Larry and Helen C. Magnuson 20909 Weld County Road 54 Greeley, CO 80631 Hugh W. and Ellen Luark 26581 Weld County Road 43 Greeley, CO 80631 Arthur L. and Frances D. Parker 26501 Weld County Road 43 Greeley, CO 80631 891002 LAND consultants Land use • Analysis • Negotiation • Development July 1'L , 1989 Mr . Rod Allison Principal Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley , CO 80631 RE : NARRATIVE SUPPLEMENT - I-25 Subdivision Planned Unit Development District Plat Dear Rod: We are pleased to submit this NARRATIVE SUPPLEMENT to the Planned Unit Development District Plat application for the I-25 Subdivision at Del Camino . ONE REMAINING CONCERN As you know, the initial submittal of March 17 , 1989 was reviewed by all appropriate Weld County staff agencies , outside referral agencies , and the Tri-Area Planning Commission . All of the concerns and comments made by these agencies were resolved with one exception - access to the State Highway system. We have now arrived at a solution to that one remaining concern. Please let us explain. The revised traffic study submitted with the I-25 Subdivision was reviewed by the Colorado Department of Highways (CDOH) . The result of that review was a finding that the westbound left-turn movement from Colorado Highway 119 southbound onto Turner Boulevard is currently at an unacceptable level of service due to inadequate storage capacity in the left turn lane. Additional traffic directed toward the intersection from the I-25 Subdivision or any other development would exacerbate the situation. For these reasons , the CDOH could not recommend approval of the I-25 Subdivision. According to CDOH, a long range comprehensive analysis of the traffic operations in the vicinity of I-25 and State Highway 119 is planned to begin sometime after July, 1989 . The CDOH also has approximately $200 ,000 for some level of construction in the area. Beyond that amount, any results of the analysis will be considered for funding in the State ' s 5-year plan and will be assigned a State priority after recommendations are received from the Weld County Commissioners on all State Highway projects in the County. Assuming a 6 month time frame for the study, it could be anywhere from 1991- 1995 before any substantial traffic solutions resulting from the analysis are implemented. SOLUTION We are interested in achieving approval for the PUD change of zone for the I-25 Subdivision. To resolve the traffic concern of the CDOH , therefore , we have revised the I-25 Subdivision to preclude any access to the north from the subdivision. All traffic will be 436 Pratt Street • Longmont, Colorado 80501 • 303-776-3147 8s1,oc,2 Mr . Rod Allison July 12 , 1989 Page 2 . directed to the south to the I-25 frontage road. No traffic will he generated into the Turner Boulevard/State Highway 119 intersection thus mitigating the concerns of the CDOH . The approach we have taken is a "win-win" solution for all parties . It will enable the owners to move forward in the planning process and to ultimately begin gradual development of the property while giving the CDOH all the time it needs to complete its traffic analysis and establish funding priorities for the recommended solutions of the analysis . Once the analysis is completed, the owners will work with CDOH to fit their future transportation needs into the recommendations of the analysis . Prior to any changes in the I-25 Subdivision, an amended PUD must be submitted, reviewed by appropriate staff and outside agencies ( including CDOH ) , and given approval by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Commissioners . Any changes we would propose to the I-25 Subdivision not in conformance with the recommendations of the CDOH analysis would clearly be denied. SUMMARY With the proposed revision of the I-25 Subdivision PUD District Plat to preclude any traffic from the subdivision from entering the problematic Turner Boulevard/State Highway 119 intersection, we have resolved each and every concern and comment which affects the PUD change of zone stage of the I-25 Subdivision. All other aspects of the plan remain the same . We respectfully submit this NARRATIVE SUPPLEMENT and copies of the amended District Plat as a supplement to our original submittal for your review and request your favorable recommendation for the I- 25 Subdivision. If questions arise or you desire further information , please don' t hesitate to contact Mike McDonough , AICP at 776-3147 . Very Truly Yours , LAND consultants { Michael B. McDonough , AICP Principal 891002 1-25 SUBDIVISION AT DEL CAMINO WELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAI\JlJ consultants 436 Pratt Street • Longmont, Colorado 80501 Submitted To Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado March 17 , 1989 Prepared For Harold Reese , Jr . Prepared By Land Consultants and McCarty Engineering Consultants 6513C 2 LAND consultants Land use • Analysis • Negotiation • Development March 17 , 1989 Mr . Rod Allison Principal Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE : I-25 Subdivision Planned Unit Development Change of Zone Submittal Dear Rod: We are pleased to submit this Planned Unit Development Change of Zone application for the I-25 Subdivision at Del Camino . The owner' s representative has given us all of the work , comments and studies prepared during the Sketch Plan stage of the process . We have thoroughly reviewed all this information and have incorporated portions of it in this submittal . We have augmented this information with our own research and have strived to address each and every one of the comments of the Weld County staff, the referral agencies , and the review criteria set forth in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. This Development Report contains : Section I . I-25 Subdivision Development Narrative Section II . Letters From Referral Agencies Section III . Storm Drainage Study _ Section IV. Traffic Study Section V. Title Company Documents Appendix PUD District Plat and the PUD Vicinity Map. We are excited about this opportunity to work with you to shape the development of a 132 acre high quality, fully integrated, mixed use park for the Del Camino area. Your guidance has proven invaluable in past land development efforts and we look forward to your assistance and advice in this project. If questions arise or you desire further information, please don ' t hesitate to contact Mike McDonough, AICP at 776-3147 . Very Truly Yours , LAND consultants Mc arty Engineering Consultants Michael B. McDonough , AICP ohn P. McCarty, P.E/ Principal Principal 436 Pratt Street • Longmont, Colorado 80501 • 303-776-3147 821002 .:,'ED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APP. ATIOt: .. _ Caae Dept. of Planning Services App. chid By: Date Rec'd: 915 10th Street App. Pee: Receipt V: Greeley, Colorado `0831 Record. Fee:_ Receipt R: Phone: 356-4000, E: r. '.:00 TO BE COMPLETED 01 A PL:CANT. Please print or type, except for neces,;ary signature. I (we), the undersigned. hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning _ Commission and the :feld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LLCAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): PRESENT ZONE A. Cl PROPOSED ZONE pilm TOTAL ACREAGE 137 OVERLAY ZONES I-25 Wired Use Development Area SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: Harold Reese, Jr. Home Telephone n: Address: 855 Sunrise Highway Bus. Telephone #: Lynbrook. NY 11563 Name: Home Telephone U: Address: Bus. Telephone U: Name: Home Telephone 0: Address: Bus. Telephone if: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above): Name: (rcCarty Fnrinrerin. Cnn,ultnntc Home Telephone U: Address: 2220 Jewel Street Bus. Telephone U: 772_7744 T ongr"ort co 80501 Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: Please See Section `/ of the Development Report Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Ct I(.('Cr COUNTY OF - ) STATE OF COLORADO ) (, ( Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this I I day of 17 Id() SEAL l/ `-' kU7/�1VIz1 NOTARYPUBLIC - My Cctnissitn erlres: 1 881' ''2 LAND consultants . . . 1 I . I-25 SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE REQUEST This is a request for approval by Weld County of the 2nd step of the 3-step planned unit development ( PUD ) application process - the change of Zone Application . The PUD Sketch Plan process has been _ successfully completed and each of the concerns noted by the Weld County staff and the referral agencies has been addressed. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The subject 132 acre property is located west of Interstate 25 and north of County Road 20 1/2 within the I-25 Mixed Use Development ( MUD ) area and is shown on the 1-25 MUD Conceptual Land Use Plan as I - Industrial . Although the land is currently zoned commercial and agricultural , the owners are requesting PUD zoning to allow for development of a first-class , integrated, mixed use park and to enable the project to be planned to conform with the requirements of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan . The land is currently used as pasture and has been held by the current owners for 19 years . The owners intend to make lots available for a variety of job- creating industries and commercial operations . The total floor area could be up to 1 . 5 million square feet with possible employment of up to 5 , 000 persons depending upon the type of users . APPLICATION FORM AND FEES Contained elsewhere within this submittal report is a reduced copy of the Planned Unit Development Plan Application. The original along with a check in the amount of $600 . 00 was submitted herewith to the Department of Planning Services . PUD CONCEPT, LAND USES AND ARCHITECTURAL STYLE The I-25 Subdivision is a Planned Unit Development of approximately 132 acres in Weld County, Colorado . The land is presently zoned Commercial (north 70 acres ) and Agriculture ( south 60 acres ) . Interstate Highway 25 is the eastern boundary of the property. The current use of the land is pasture and outdoor advertising signs . The overall concept for the property is the development of a high quality, integrated mixed use park making land available for a variety of users . In keeping with the underlying goal of a planned unit development , the development will possess : 1 . Functional integrity in terms of vehicular circulation and linkages and in terms of pedestrian circulation providing access to on-site amenities . 8910 J2 LAND consultants . . . 2 2 . Compatibility with adjacent uses through such impact mitigation techniques as landscaping , fencing , berming , and placement of uses . 3 . Internal compatibility of uses through both the PUD process and covenants specifying a set of guidelines for lot-by-lot landscaping , lighting , off street loading and parking , and screening specific use separation, etc . 4 . Advantageous view from the perspective of the traveling public due to the beautification of a major entrance to the Del Camino area . This is to be accomplished in phases ' through extensive landscaping , sign control and provision of a naturally-shaped lake on the eastern perimeter of the site . 5 . Advantageous view from the perspective of the tenants of the park regarding the view of the Rocky Mountains . This is to be accomplished through overlot grading which will balance the elevations on the site relative to Interstate 25 . The planned uses are intended to be those permitted in the C-1 through C-4 Commercial and I-1 Light Industrial zones . A limited amount of outdoor storage is intended but only on lots along the western boundary of the subdivision where substantial buffering techniques will be required. Approximately 45 lots are to be created as part of the Planned Unit Development Plan stage of the process . The minimum lot size will be 1 acre . All uses within the park will meet the requirements of the Longmont Fire Protection District . Although no residential units are planned for the park , some uses may require a caretaker or night watchman' s unit in the interest of security per the October 14 , 1988 Weld County Sheriff ' s memo contained in Section II of this report . Any such unit will not be a free-standing structure but will be integrated into the structure it serves . Restrictive covenants will be recorded controlling the architectural design of all buildings to be constructed or altered within the park . The covenants will also set forth use restrictions , maximum percentage of building and parking coverage , signage restrictions , and guidelines setting forth minimum standards for landscaping , off-street loading , off-street parking , lighting , signage , and maintenance responsibility. All on-site amenities are to be maintained through the creation of a property owners association. Building height will not exceed 35 feet and lot coverage by buildings and parking areas will not exceed 85%. 891002 LAND consultants . . . 3 The covenants , which will be recorded with the final plat , will restrict all outdoor storage to lots along the west boundary of the development and specify extensive buffering for such both from internal and external uses as well . CONSISTENCY WITH THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Weld County Comprehensive Plan ( WCCP ) sets forth a set of goals and policies intended to help guide the development of the I-25 MUD area. This section of the narrative provides a discussion as to how the I-25 Subdivision IS consistent with each policy by number in the order in which they occur in the WCCP. 1 . I-25 Subdivision property is shown on the I-25 MUD area Conceptual land Use Plan as I - Industrial uses . The uses requested in this application conform with that category of use . 2 . The WCCP anticipates eventual growth in the Del Camino area and creates an I-25 MUD area to provide for the orderly and desirable development of the area . All developments in this area must be approved through the PUD process . The process is designed to offer flexibility and creativity of design to developers while providing that plans are reviewed by the County and explained to surrounding land owners to ensure adequacy of support systems and to mitigate impacts . The owners , through this PUD process , intend to fully comply with the intent of the WCCP. 3 . All potential adverse impacts to surface and ground water will be mitigated through a carefully engineered storm drainage plan ( Section III of this report ) which will retain site-generated runoff and release it to existing drainage facilities at historical rates . In addition, sanitary sewer will be provided by the St . Vrain Sanitation District and water will be provided by Left Hand Water District per letters from same attached hereto ( Section II ) . 4 . No free-standing residential units are planned for this development . We do request that caretaker or night watchman ' s units integrated into the principal use which they serve be allowed. 5 . Compatibility with surrounding uses is demonstrated through the designation of the property on the I-25 MUD area Conceptual land Use Plan for I - Industrial uses . In addition , the final PUD development plan will include covenants which will restrict use , placement of uses , building height and coverage, and intensity. The scale will be restricted by building height and building coverage together with parking and landscaping requirements . Traffic is addressed in the traffic report included herein . Dust will be controlled through paving of all roads to Weld County standards . 8919'22 LAND consultants . . . 4 6 . The owners intend to take full advantage of the location of this property both in terms of views afforded tenants of the park and in terms views presented to the travelling public on Interstate 25 entering the area. Overlot grading and extensive landscaping will maximize the site potential in both instances . 7 . The commercial development intended for the park will be controlled by a set of minimum standards for lot-by-lot development as well as the overall landscape plan for the entire development . Traffic circulation has been carefully planned to concentrate access to County and State roadways . 8 . A campus-like environment is ensured through the standards and minimum guidelines to be established in the restrictive covenants . 9 . Through the PUD process and our proposed covenants , landscape treatments are proposed which both buffer the park from potentially incompatible surrounding uses and tie the park together as a whole through consistency where the park is exposed to the public . 10 . No residential units are planned in this development . 11 . Although no junkyards , salvage yards or landfills are planned, outdoor storage is intended. The only location which is to be set aside for uses needing outdoor storage is the western edge of the park where visibility screened from view through a combination of grade, landscaping , fencing and other buffering techniques . 12 . The PUD process is designed to ensure that the County staff is satisfied that our proposed landscaping , buffering and screening program will accomplish the desired separation. This proposal anticipates thorough review and is sensitive to the need for separation. 13 . The advertising signs currently on the site will be removed. In their stead , a signage plan promoting uniformity of design, size and scale relative to building size will be incorporated in the proposed covenants . 14 . All signs will conform to the ultimately approved PUD development plan and the proposed restrictive covenants for the park . In addition , all signs will conform with Weld County Sign regulations . 15 . This proposal complies with the public facilities and service sections of the WCCP. 891002 LAND consultants . . . 5 We have not done a fiscal impact study for this development since we are not sure exactly which uses will ultimately locate in the park . Such an exercise would be pure speculation at best . As has been shown in numerous studies , however , residential developments typically create a greater demand for services than the revenues they generate . On the other hand, commercial uses generate substantially more than the costs of services they require . Industrial developments typically break even by themselves but when one considers the employment multiplier for service jobs and the income multiplier for multiple iterations of spending payroll dollars, the indirect impact of industrial uses is positive . Given the mixed _ commercial/industrial nature of the proposed development , we can safely predict a positive revenue versus cost of service ratio. 16 . The owners are willing to participate in the costs of reasonable improvements which are directly attributable to demands placed on public facilities or public services by this development . Such attribution is to be determined during the 3rd stage of the PUD process - PUD Development Plan - when users , distribution of costs and timing can more accurately be identified. 17 . During the Sketch Plan step of this process , a traffic study was prepared to determine the traffic generation attributable to this development ( Section IV) . The PUD District Plat configuration is a result of that study after review by appropriate authorities . All roadways within the development will be designed to meet the requirements of the Weld County Engineering Department . The Colorado Division of Highways has expressed an interest in converting the southbound on ramp to I-25 to one-way southbound. This will necessitate reconfiguration of access for certain properties currently relying on the two-way on-ramp. We believe we may have a solution to this problem and intend to pursue same with the Division . 18 . It appears that no mineral resources are present on this site . 19 . This site is not within a flood plain district nor are geologic hazards present . 20 . No aquifer recharge areas are present on this site . 21 . Air quality impacts will be mitigated through the operation of state and federal regulations as well as through the provision of paved roadways within the park . 22 . Fugitive dust shall be controlled during the development process and in the construction process in accordance with all applicable Weld County and state laws . 891972 LAND consultant.- . . . 6 23 . In the past. , this property has been extensively farmed and irrigated . All vegetation on the site has come about as a result of the lack of farming activity over the past few years . The consultant is working with the Denver Office of the Corps of Engineers to resolve the designation of a portion of this site as a "wetland" . The matter will be resolved prior to the 3rd stage of the process . 24 . The Soil Conservation Service and the County Extension Service will be consulted and their recommendations shall be incorporated into a revegetation program for the site . 25 . Native species will be considered as an approach to revegetation of the site after construction activities in conjunction with the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service and the County Extension Service . 26 . No State Park or Recreation Area is included within or adjacent to the site . 27 . We welcome the referral of this project to any and all agencies whose assistance and coordination is desirable . 28 . We would gladly participate with the County to prepare a "Planning Area Profile" to the extent that the I-25 Subdivision is I - involved. COMPATIBILITY WITHIN THE PUD DISTRICT 35 . 3 . 1 Compatibility - Through the PUD process , the perimeter landscape plan will be reviewed for adequacy and the covenants regulating the internal relationship between uses will ensure compatibility. An overall buffering plan for the park and a lot-by- lot set of standards will be included in the landscape/buffering package for the development . 35 . 3 . 2 Common Open Space - a lake of approximately 5 surface acres is planned for use within the park for both multi-functional uses . Pedestrian access to the naturally-shaped lake will be provided for the enjoyment of the occupants of the development . The lake will function as a storm drainage retention facility to comply with State of Colorado law for runoff of improved property at an ! _ historical rate . The lake will be operated and maintained by the property owners association. 35 . 3 . 3 Water and Sewer Provision - Public water will be provided by the Left Hand Water District and sanitary Sewer will be provided by the St . Vrain Sanitation District per letters from same included in Section II of this report . r _ 891002 L\\t) consultants . . . 7 35 . 3 . 4 Circulation - Pedestrian and vehicular circulation has been provided for through site-specific planning as well as provision for ultimate linkages to external circulation systems . All streets shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Official Weld County Construction Standards and the Official Weld County Subdivision Regulations . 35 . 3 . 5 Buffering and Screening - As noted in prior sections of this report , compatibility within and adjacent to the park shall be achieved through the thoroughness of the PUD process and our proposed covenants which will strictly regulate use placement , landscaping on the overall development and lot-by-lot development . The functional integrity of the development is a mutual desire of both the County and the owners . 35 . 3 . 6 Performance Standards - This development will meet or exceed the development standards of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance . The details of how this will be accomplished will be set forth in the — PUD Development Plan step of the process . 35 . 3 . 7 Mining Uses - No mining activities are planned within the _ I-25 Subdivision. As a matter fact , these uses will be strictly prohibited. 35 . 3 .8 Subdivision Regulation Compliance - As mentioned above, the owners ar willing to participate in the costs of reasonable improvements which are directly attributable to demands placed on public facilities or public services by this development. Such — attribution is to be determined during the 3rd stage of the PUD process - PUD Development Plan - when users , distribution of costs and timing can more accurately be identified. 35 . 3 . 9 Enforcement of PUD - The owners will agree to name the Weld County Commissioners as a third party beneficiary in the PUD District and Plan intended to regulate the development of the I-25 Subdivision to ensure enforcement of the provisions thereof. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING USES The uses proposed within the PUD district are in accord with the WCCP and will be compatible with all surrounding land uses. Where the development is adjacent to a mobile home park , extensive landscaping and other mitigation techniques shall be used to mitigate any potential adverse impacts . All uses employing outdoor storage will be located on the extreme western edge of the park with grading , landscaping and buffering techniques to be utilized to visually separate these uses from view of the public and adjacent land users . 891022 LAND consultants . . . S USES PERMITTED WITHIN THE PUD The uses within the proposed PUD District will be those allowed in the C-1 , C-2 , C-3 , C-1 , and the I-1 districts except those requiring special review. Outdoor storage is being requested as a use in the western-most lots which , if approved, will require extensive buffering . Oil and gas extraction will not be a permitted use within the 1-25 Subdivision . OPEN SPACE DESCRIPTION As a functional element of this development , we intend to provide a naturally-shaped lake of approximately 5 acres with a paved pedestrian footpath as an amenity of the development . The lake will serve as a storm drainage collection point as well as a gathering point for occupants of the development during good weather . During inclement weather as well as during good weather , the lake will serve as a visual separation or setback for observers travelling on Interstate 25 enhancing the beauty of a major entrance to the Del Camino Area . Pedestrians will be able to gain access to the lake and several landscaped areas from the streets of the subdivision. Maintenance of the lake will be the responsibility of a legally created property owners association . In addition , each separate site within the development will contain at least 15% of the total area in landscaped area designed to enhance the site itself as well as tie the site into the overall open space access plan for the development . WATER SERVICE Water service for the 1-25 Subdivision will be provided by the Left Hand Water Company.The existing main water line in Colorado Highway 119 just to the north of the site . Plans are being studied which will enable the 4 water providers in the area to significantly increase the available water service capacity. A letter from the Company is incorporated in Section II of this report . SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the St . Vrain Sanitation District as evidenced by the letter included in this development report in Section II . The existing 15" main service line in Turner Boulevard is within 250 ' of the property. The District is in the process of acquiring an easement across property separating this development from Turner Boulevard to enable installation of an extension of said line to serve this development . 891022 LAND consultants . . . 9 PUD DISTRICT VEHICULAR ACCESS Vehicular access will be provided from the existing frontage road connecting the I-25 Subdivision to the north to the intersection of Colorado Highway 119 and Interstate 25 and to the south to County Roads 20 1 /2 and 22 . The owners are willing to participate in reasonable improvements to the frontage road as determined by the Colorado Division of Highways . The owners will be responsible for — paving of all on-site roadways . As development in the Del Camino area progresses , a major transportation linkage in the southwestern quadrant will be Turner Boulevard . The I-25 Subdivision has anticipated this and has provided an extension of Turner Boulevard through the park to the Interstate 25 frontage road . The southern terminus of the existing Turner Boulevard, however , is approximately 250 feet from the northern boundary of the I-25 Subdivision creating a gap in continuity. The owners of the I-25 Subdivision have approached the owners of the property separating existing Turner Boulevard and the I-25 Subdivision but have not been able to come to a resolution of the problem. Two potential solutions are in the offing . First , the owners are working to form an improvement district to provide funds for acquisition and improvement of the existing gap in continuity of Turner Boulevard . Second, the Colorado Division of Highways is about to embark upon a study to determine the most feasible method of converting the southbound on-ramp to Interstate 25 into a one-way south roadway . In order to provide vehicular access to properties currently depending on the two-way on-ramp, an alternative means of access will have to be provided. One approach may be to extend the south terminus of Turner Boulevard easterly to connect to the frontage road just north of the I-25 Subdivision . Another approach would be to connect the existing Turner Boulevard to the continuation of Turner Boulevard in the I-25 Subdivision thereby eliminating the need for the frontage road access to the other properties . These properties could then access Turner Boulevard to their west. Interior streets will include an 80 foot right-of-way running north to south through the center of the I-25 Subdivision with 60 foot right-of-way cul-de-sacs approximately as shown on the plan . All roads will be constructed in accordance with Weld County recommendations and regulations but will remain private until connected to Turner Boulevard. No determination has been made as to whether curb and gutter will be installed. 891®"'2 LAND consuitants . . . 10 a traffic study , included herein as Section IV , has been prepared for the owners which concludes that existing and proposed improvements to State Highway 119 and the frontage roads should be adequate to serve this project for at least the next 5 years . Provisions have been made to connect Turner Boulevard to County Road 22 and County Road 20 1/2 in the future if required to provide additional access to the site . SOILS Soils on the site as determined from Soil Conservation Service maps are as follows : Number Name 4 Wily-Colby-Weld Silt Loam 27 Heldt Silty Clay 38 Nelson Fine Sandy Loam 47 Olney Fine Sand Loam 76 , 77 Vona Sandy Loam Wily-Colby-Weld Silt Loam occurs in a narrow band near the center of the site . The potential is fair for urban development, with moderately slow permeability as the main limitation. Heldt Silty Clay makes up the northerly third of the site . SCS rates this soil poor for urban development , with low permeability and high shrink swell being the main concerns . Foundation and road design in this area of the site will be based upon the recommendations of a qualified soils engineer. A test pit dug in the Fall of 1988 revealed ground water at a depth of approximately 4 feet . Nelson Fine Sandy Loam occurs in the south part of the property at the top of the hill . Shallow sandstone is the only potential problem for development on this soil . A test pit was dug in this area in the Fall of 1988 and a tractor-mounted back hoe had no difficulty digging to a depth of approximately 18 feet . Olney Fine Sand Loam occurs in a small area at the southwest corner of the site . This soil has an excellent potential for development , with the only limitation being contamination of groundwater by septic systems . Since this project will be served by public sanitary sewer, ground water contamination is not a concern. Vona Sandy Loam occurs on the remainder of the south portion of the property. It is a deep-drained soil well suited to urban development . 89100.2 LAND consultants . . . It COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSIT The Weld County Sand, Gravel Resources map does not appear to depict this site as having any commercially usable mineral resource . FLOOD HAZARD AREA There are no flood plains affecting the site . The north half of the site, however, is extremely flat and subject to a periodic high water table . Overlot grading , construction of the proposed lake and drainage control will alleviate this condition. There is an irrigation ditch running through the south half of the property. Lot layout has been arranged in such a way that this ditch can remain in its present location and will be crossed by a road in only one location . The type of crossing will be designed in accordance with ditch company specifications . There are no other watercourses or bodies of water on the site . GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA This site is not in any known geologic hazard area. REQUIRED SIGN POSTING The required sign will be posted on the site a minimum of 10 days prior to the hearing date . ADJACENT SURFACE OWNERS Section V of this development report contains a list of surface property owners within 500 feet of the site prepared by Weld County Title Company in accordance with Weld County requirements . ADJACENT MINERAL OWNERS Section V of this development report contains a list of mineral rights owners with rights on or under this site prepared by Weld County Title Company in accordance with Weld County requirements . ADDITIONAL, INFORMATION The approval of this request may involve additional review of the application in terms of Section 40 Supplementary District Regulations and Section 50 Overlay Districts . Having thoroughly studied these sections of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance , we feel that the discussion supplied in this report demonstrates that the proposal will meet or exceed the requirements set forth in those sections. 891002 LAND consultants . . . 12 There are no existing habitable structures on the property. The _ 4 illuminated billboards will be removed . There are several easements which are shown on the plan . No unique natural features are apparent on the site . There is an existing mobile home park directly north of the site . The land along Colorado Highway 119 is being used for commercial purposes . All other land within one half mile of the site is agricultural . Landscaping for each lot will conform to the restrictive _ covenants and the PUD plan application. These standards will be written and drafted to show a typical lot development in terms of building coverage and location, parking requirements , off-street loading requirements , lighting , signage , and minimum landscaping conforming to Weld County standards for such . Perimeter landscaping will consist of the lake with landscaping and a minimum 20 foot strip along the remainder of the east boundary and along the north boundary to be planted with a wide variety of disease resistant , drought tolerant evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs in clusters. The area between the trees and shrubs will be mulched with gravel , bark , or wood chips . Sufficient ground-covering shrubs will be planted to ensure that at maturity, the non-living mulch will be completely covered . Storm drainage from both off-site and the developed site will be retained in the lake shown on the plan. If necessary, additional ponding areas may be designated as the design progresses . Open channels will be used to convey storm water to the ponding area. Discharge will be via the existing culverts under Interstate 25 . Ponding volumes will be calculated and release controlled to prevent the rate of discharge from exceeding the historic rate . DISTRICT PLAT A Planned Unit Development District Plat prepared to Weld County specifications is incorporated in this report inside the back cover . VICINITY MAP A Planned Unit Development District Vicinity Map prepared to Weld County specifications is incorporated in this report inside the back cover . 891902 at. (Maltz cSanitatlon L)LSt2CCt fcSaint cSan) boo JKan1'a,k :Shut Cult£ l 7L�Crl r�,n£ bro /'/b-y9'/U lionyrnun t, C1. Solos March 2, 1989 Mr. Colin D. Bills Shawnee Systems ' P. 0. Box 221 Shawnee, Colorado 80475 Dear Mr. Bills: Reference is made to your letter of February 22, 1989 applying for sanitary sewer service to Del Camino Industrial Park (a.k.a. I-25 Subdivision). This property is within St. ' Vrain Sanitation District and can be served. Capacity is available, on a first come first serve basis, and should continue to be available for the build-out of this property. In order to be served, you will have to construct the on-site collection system and approximately 240 feet of off-site trunk line, both to District standards. The District will review and approve all engineering drawings and construction. Installation can be done in phases to meet your development needs. Upon completion and acceptance of each phase, the trunk and collector lines must be dedicated (i.e. donated) to the District who will then maintain and operate them as part of the overall collection system. The 240 feet of off-site construction requires a sewer line extension agreement. This agreement will require that you pay the total cost of the off-site extension, but that you will be reimbursed on an equitable, pro-rata basis by adjoining properties upon their connection. The District will obtain the easement required for this construction, but the cost will be included in the total cost for which you are responsible. You will need to deposit 51,500 with the District to cover the legal and administrative cost of the agreement and the easement acquisition. This amount must be deposited before further effort can be expended. Any unused amounts will be returned or credited to other obligations, as you so choose. 891002 Mr. Colin D. Bills Shawnee Systems March 2, 1989 Page 2 for both the on and off-site construction, you will be responsible for the cost of an eight-inch line, which is the minimum size permitted. The District will pay for the additional cost of installing larger diameter lines as required. This additional cost will be refunded to you out of connection fees as the District is financially able to do so. Each lot will then be required to pay a Plant Investment Fee of $3,000 (or the then current charge) for each single family equivalent represented by its projected wastewater load plus a $40 inspection fee upon construction of a building. The service to said building must also be to District standards and will be inspected. I hope this letter answers most of your questions. District Rules and Regulations govern. Please call me if you need additional information. Once you have a firm site plan, I will need to meet with your engineer. We are ready to proceed upon receipt of the $1,500 deposit. • Very truly yours, ST. VRA S TATION DISTRICT tie. . Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:js 891902 ERIFF ME?iiCRANDUNP TO ._Planning FROM _ Fri .Tnrda _fr .. DATE 101488 / RE Site Security and Facility Protection This proposal is focused on industrial and commercial development that does not lend itself to formation of a law enforcement authority as a means to address those costs. We are recommending that the covenants for the project be amended to include information to the effect that site security and facility protection will be provided through private security arranged and compensated by the property owners association. The Weld County Sheriff will respond to provide service only as required to investigate a crime. Random area patrol, general area and facility security are not the responsiblity of the Weld County Sheriff according to the Colorado Revised Statutes. We do not have the resources necessary to provide other than what I have described for facilities of this type. I realize that enforcement of covenants makes this requirement difficult to implement. However, having the role of the Sheriff's Office made clear in such a manner will hopefully inform property owners of their responsibilities at the time of purchase. • 891002 HEANO Post Office Box 210, Niwot, CO 80544-0210 WATE- • SUPPLY c-Mvs►rovI (303) 632-2188, Metro (303) 443-2036 February 15, 1989 RECEIVED FEB 1 6 1989 :r. Charles R. Johnson, P. E. Sutherland, Inc. Building No. 5, Suite 26 6458 So. Quebec Street Englewood, CO 80111 Dear Mr. Johnson: We are in receipt of your letter of January 23, 1989 concerning taps for the proposed I-23 Subdivision P. U. D. It is our understanding that over the next ten (10) to twenty (20) years this subdivision will require forty-five (45) three-quarter (3/4) inch taps, but it will only require approximately seven (7) over the next three (3) years. Our recently installed cross-tie with the Central Weld County Water District allows us to add an additional forty (40) taps in the Del Camino area. These taps are available on a first-come first-served basis and can only be reserved if paid for. Once a tap is paid for, the Owner has One (1) year to have his/her meter installed. Once the meter is installed the Owner starts paying the monthly minimum whether he/she uses any water or not. If the meter is not installed with- in one (1) year, the Owner will be billed the monthly minimum from that point on until the meter is installed and put into use. If an individual has a tap approved he/she has sixty (60) days to pay for the tap, which starts the one (1) year period mentioned :above. _ The individual may apply for an extension of the sixty (60) day time period. If no one else has applied for a tap that affects the previously approved tap, the extension may be granted. However, if thereare applications in for taps in the same area as the previously approved tap, and the mainline capacity is limited, the extension will not be granted and the individual must pay for his/her tap or risk losing it. There are plans underway to further improve service to the area, but they are months, if not years, down the road. In order for us to pursue this matter further, the Owner or his/her representative must submit a tap request application. If you have any questions, please contact us at 443-2036. 'ncerely, James M. Dickey General Manager EWW/rr enclosure 891302 DRAINAGE REPORT I-25 SUBDIVISION Part of SE)* Sec. 10 6 NEk Sec. 15, T. 2 N, R 68 W. Weld County, Colorado INDEX Descriptive Narrative Location 1 Scope and Purpose 1 Design Criteria 1 Relationship of Interstate 25 1 Detention 2 Street Pattern 3 Building Sites 3 Conclusion 3 Storm Drainage Calculations - Typical for 2+ Acre Lots 5 Storm Drainage Calculations - Typical for 3+ Acre Lots 6 Drainage Basin Map 7 Drainage Plan 8 ,,,,,,„•,,,, ,`,,,pPO LINp''•% :D 27i y •L aEvict i$ 0?:' r• ENO •,,• Q.,� 8910(22 ,,,,,oF,co,,,, DESCRIPTIVE NARRATIVE Location: This drainage report is prepared for a parcel; approximately 73 Acres in area, situated in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West and in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 15 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West , Weld County, Colorado. The developers propose to create 25 lots , varying between 2 and 4 acres , for commercial and light industrial sites. The property is bordered by 1-25 along the East property line , by undeveloped, grassy land to the South and West, and on the North by the Del Camino development of commercial and light industrial uses and the Del Camino Village. Scope and Purpose: Field investigations , a Soils Investigation Report and study of topographic maps of the area substantiate neighbors' claims that this is a flat , wet area that has been an historical drainage problem. This poor situation is compounded by a very high water table through- out the area. This report will attempt to define the several problems and deal with them with regard to the proposed development of the property. Design Criteria: The subject parcel lies within a larger drainage basin which flows in a northerly direction. The sub-basin considered in this report and as shown on the Drainage Basin Map consists of approxi- mately 400 Acres and is defined by ditches on all sides but the Ncrtheast corner, at which point the flow continues across the subject property. The natural (undeveloped ) 100 yr . flood is calculated to be 95 cfs : Using the Rational Method, Qh = C.I .A. where : C = . 26 (runoff coefficient) I = .91 inches (rainfall intensity) A = 400 Acres (basin area) Q = .26 x .91 x 400 = 95 cfs Relationship of Interstate 25 : The Colorado Department of Highways designed and constructed the adjacent section of I-25 within the past 20 years . Their design incorporated the inclusion or enlargement of four culverts under the highway along this section . According to the Highway Department plans , there are : a ) a 24" CMP at the Northeast corner of this property (which with about 1 .0 foot of head passes 15 . 1 cfs ) ; b) a 30" CMP approximately 425 feet South of the first pipe (which with about .75 feet of head passea 20 . 5 cfs ) ; c ) a 24" CMP approximately 665 feet further South ( which with about 1 .0 foot of head , passes 15 . 1 cfs ) ; and d ) a 24" CMP about SSO feet further South (which with about 1 .0. foot of head passes 15 . 1 cfs ) . These 4 pipes can accommodate 65 .8 cfs . of the historical flow. The head used is based on the proposed bernint; ! as later discussed ) required to detain the excess storm runoff without flooding developable parcels . 891902 1 . . By these calculations the highway culverts fall 29 cfs short ( with water about 2 feet deep ) of being able to handle the historical runoff of 95 cfs . Previous to the construction of I-25 , runoff flowed naturally to the East . Now, the highway blocks this flow, damming storm drainage onto the subject property . Therefore , some ponding will need to be provided to create a head for the culverts and to store the remainder of the flow in order to help alleviate this flood hazard situation. Detention : To accommodate a large portion of this water to be detained , a 75 foot wide easement along the East property line is indicated on the plat . Within this easement a low area will be created when the lots are filled such that a long, wide ditch will provide on-site detention for some of the excess storm runoff. (See Figure 1 . ) Additionally , the 75 feet easement can be used in satisfaction of the landscaping requirement , for parking area, and for the required utility easement . BO R.O.W J „gam.— (Os/Comho Awr. Ot1471/79 Sik I 1e' Easement _ 25 ��' .1_ elcr c i ROW �� FM twangng A,w,_ &im 7 Erl.Nny Grocr� T— ..� __ Dien/ien Aren—Y� ProMase Sank bt/wroth L,4 Exsa y CMo Fig. 1 : Typical Section of Lot with Detention Area. (No Scale) Within this 75 foot easement , berms will be built in order to divert runoff toward the nearest culvert crossing under 1-25. Figures 2 63 illustrate this plan. Permission from the Colorado Department of Highways will need to be obtained to perform this construc-. tion. u it )� ` li II le-2440r V-Zr Cyr u u II \\ so' : \` Seem • • �70' n Easel& term --T- • pp. eieM - • Block / E4 N Fig. 2 : Plan of Berm Construction (No Scale) 89100'2 2. I-25 -1 .vest Te Slope Bath0 • , •' r va.n HMV rc Berm Berm Bum Fig . 3 : Section of Berm Construction Additional detention will be provided on each lot to accommodate the developed runoff created by new construction. Attached are the calculations for this requirement. Street Pattern: ' On-site , the street layout has been designed so that drainage will flow in the borrow ditches in a northerly direction. Some of this will flow East in the Hopi Court ditch and, via a swale in the 20 ' easementtetween Lots 7 and 9 , Block 1 , through the 24 " CMP crossing under I-25 . The rest of the street drainage will follow similar routes eventually flowing East under I-25 or to the North along the frontage road . The entire street system will be raised from the existing ground by an average of 3 feet, thus raising it out of the problem wet area . (See streetplan/profile sheets) . Building Sites : The building sites will also need to be raised to avoid the same potential for flood damage and to conform to the proposed street elevations . (See Fig. 1 ) The minimum elevation of the finished grade at the building will be 89 for lots at the North end of the subject property. This mini- mum elevation will increase for the South lots relative to the street elevations . Conclusion: In conclusion, the .natural drainage problem in this area has been aggravated by the construction of I-25 and the culverts now existing constitute o limiting factor to passing the 100 year flood . The developers of the subject property will need to provide a raised street system with culverts, raised building sites, detention on each lot ibr the extra storm water caused by parcel development , detention of part or the "historical" runoff in a 75 foot easement , and berming in this easement . 891902 3. Compliance with these design criteria not only will be in accord with minimum provisions for development-created drainage runoff , but also will help to alleviate the previously discussed existing problems. It is also recommended that, at the time of application for a building permit , an additional drainage study be prepared for the particular building and site conditions of each lot . To be consistent with the intent of this report and Weld County requirements, it is strongly recommended to the governing body that all future construc- tion projects within this drainage basin provide something more than the minimum required detention facilities . • 4. 891002 DRAINAGE REPORT bate July 17 , 1979 - Report Prc,.ared For : "I-25 Subdivision" Harold 6 Fred Reese • - Legal Description of lands included in study Part SE: Sec. 10 & NE% Sec. 15,, T. 2 N, R. 68 W, Weld County, Colorado T,:e following formulas are used to determine rainfall runoff intensities and detention volumes required. Typical for based on 100 year storm intensity. 2+ Acre Lots -. This Study u., = CIA C = Runoff Coefficient - ,20 t I = Rainfall Intensity 3 . 85 inches A - Area of Basin ' 2 . 5 acres Qh = Total Runoff 1 .93 cfs Q = CIA C = Runoff Coefficient = . 50 t d I = Rainfall intensity - 3 . 85 inches A = Area of Basin — a• cres — Qd - Total Runoff - 4.81 c• fs Tc- 1 . 8 (1 . 1-c) rir T3— - c = Runoff Coefficient = . 50 8 D = Basin length = 330 ft. S = Slope of Basin = . 30 8 Ni - T (0 .-Q ) 2 60 Tee Time of concentration (Bev. Area) 29 .29 min. ,J 44 __ a Volume detained = .070 ac. ft d Q Developed runoff rate = 4 . 81 cfs Oh= Historic runoff rate = .7. .113— cfs commutations for this study: in _ .20 x 3 . 85 x 2 .5 1 _93 cfs �� _ . 50 x 3 . 85 x 2. 5 = 4. 81 cfs fe - 1 . 8 (1 . 1- . 50 ) r-3-5-0 ' 29. 29 min V 30 _ V = 29 .291 4 . 81-1. 93 ) 2 60 4 . 81 x435T0 = 070 ac. ft. .:uf . : The . 070 acre ft . of developed runoff will be directed to flow toward and will be detained in the Northeast corner of each lot and will be re- - leased at the historical rate of 1 . 93 cfs through an 8" CMP. No vehicular traffic will cross the berm over the pipe. The berm will be 80 ' x 86' x 1 ' deep with one foot of cover directly over the pipe. 891002 5. DRAINAGE REPORT Date July 17 , 1979 Hcl.urt Preearcd For: "T-25 Subdivision" Harold & Fred Reese Legal Description of lands included in study Part SE: Sec. 10 & NE: ' Sec. 15 , T. 2 N. , R. 68 W. , Weld County, Colorado. The following formulas are used to determine rainfall runoff intensities and detention volumes required. _ Typical for based en 100 year storm intensity. 3+ Acre Lots This Study u = CIA C = Runoff Coefficient = .20 % _ ' I = Rainfall Intensity = -3.85 inches A = Area of Basin - 3 . 5 acres Qh = Total Runoff = _L, 70 cfs V = CIA C = Runoff Coefficient = . 50 % d I = Rainfall Intensity = 3 . 85 inche≤ A - Area of Basin = 3, 5 acres Qd = Total Runoff - 6 ,74 _ cfs T,:- 1 . 8 (1 . 1-c) Fr � - C = Runoff Coefficient = . 50 % VV '� U = Basin length = 600 ft. S = Slope of Basin = 30 % V = .ic (Qd-Q1) 2 60 Tee Time of concentration (Dev. Ares) - 39. 49 min. x V = Volume detained - .132 ac. ft `'d 4 t�0d= Developed runoff rate = 6. 74 cfs Oh. Historic runoff rate 2 .70 cfs Lum, utations for this study : !., _ . 20 x 3 . 85 x 3 . 5 2 . 70 cfs ,,u - . 50 x 3 . 85 A 3 . 5 6. 74 cfs i = 1 . 8 (1. 1- . 50 ) f600 = 39 .49 min e V . 30 V = 39. 49( 6. 74-2 . 70 ) 2 60 6 . 74 x ITST0 - .132 ac . ft. ,.0 l. : The .132 acre ft . of developed runoff will be directed to flow toward and will be detained in the Northeast corner of each lot and will be released at the historical rate of 2. 70 cfs through a 10" CMP. No vehicular traffic will cross the berm over the pipe. The berm will be 100 ' x 100 ' x 1 ' deep with one foot of cover directly over the pipe. 891002 ri. r 4 S soak 4 1X4NJv i �� I' / e 9 ::NH 1O r / 11 �r. 9 Y� O r K �� i # G • �. N.In ( 4 c j s. a , IN II 1 � „....i _ 1 _ �., IIaM' Co_Rd.2S. `i' aen \' I mt / 16,91 All 15 `` .II,Y l,l `.i' ,0 / 1 .(3,.; '"' \ •44.,.. F4 • P 4881 'r• I;20 i1 :/ )1 \ : � Ifl I • s 216• --• / /;.. oiz: it 23 - - JI ..3 / II 1'1'IM1k, •/ 1• ti - Je Drainage Flow Arrow . • I j r • DRAINAGE I!BASIN MAP JI `�/ 1 . 8919' Z N 7, ryry jar N.W. Ccr.-+I p qo°51'• -. ...h Z 04 I -. __�_ His 4 ✓ YG® E.-2 SE 3r'L' ,_,71.:-...:2.--_- - I ,^.. I �rNnrtn �.� �.B' REESE-o-STREET=7,e� 4 0' Acwss Easement io Orainaa B i� 3.977 Ae.: ''i2e91stT " S,Bd•51 '�7",E. re 333.40 II2,286 Ac: ' �� P sot.72• 4 m �44"� ! .,k {:{ I • O N co I I =341.18'- _J L J _341.46'— " 2 989 Ac.: I I rS.8Bt!.5I,57°E ^— — N Y _ t d �i N rl) 12`14 €. sro,� ,2.361 Ac:1 •�• 4 N n y�' 4 N�,.• n n•'� Ili— — S.P. °�I i E.— P N4jkf ' � . I R 1f-e'' `; I n v 2.984 Ac.t ;h,,.;a I 1-22 :8.98:-"f/ 1r O ...W72;' . NAVAJO COURT ;� L—?61.81( N ..an • • .(NA —2..03.3 is f- 595.7z' ''I I•. .:. , is „w L _ ,6!°',r.r7 -.— .. ..J I % .2. 7I •AS�t _ .71 '2.243Ac./ - _, 2.969 Ac . ., I >• /...; i qFp !'511 '; 1l i�1F.O« 09.+1,1 N 5, 1 • r O .! 'ij4 we v i F,! tts�..�°4,, ' ' 1 •W..N p ,.312�t141 ,f at'.31{?9 J • I `05.72 M r$.139°_ dt Sos. r kr r- - - -•— .. .� T'. I i 2.f?�q,S ,A 4.:1I 2.177 Ac.t' v -40 I �� c Ir :4x7":1'Ym I ;p 1°\• 2.989 Ac.: • :C..' + eli; �f�� C�( ) y! rnf.• , I•.,..‘ 4'1 P pi 1,�1;• Ji ! It' I.v ry O ar in O •;4 1i: 01 \v. •:c." ...-14..,.,I I . N`, I v E I :, ^ I.-�239,73'J Iv, M _ 505.12' ^ 1 �—$, 89551 ' 57"8.—�-x.1.1 I' Z '0• N P ''a s.23?.56 N '" _ W —30, HOPI I C C JR T�a: _ r• 3 — - - - --i 337.56' /— co > I—-- 240.07\ I N I1. I 2.989 Ac. : 14 I K J 4 z in Ir. P P .N/ 1 2.000 Ac:j ; 2.157 AC!l N N. , � • � Y � z �m O I _N ' u o i`! 505.7 U I - ' oV I Q I2 ' / :a l 7; — • �J I N r 5.84 7.. F =_ M r ° '^ - -Q~ Q I _J I, J Al 2.981 Ac.: ,_it U f •_ 282.16•.) �28'c.li,� /'� 504.32 — tV MM —I A W e 2.511 Ac.: I I m N� 0572' I c L I. L..__ 89• sl' 57"1:- -- I o IS`e9_'-_7• — - -. 1 �7 N Q ,r, I 2.989 Ac.: I - = I L' I -f 4r vSo 2.4E6 Ac.: 2 - 1-- r ® I,4 QN / 2 `+ / N .:N I O \' N 505.72' 'rnl' — L— _5?7.9 '_-- I s� - 0 2.382 Ac! : ,•� 1 p W an 1 2.9`89�Ac.• -,,,g jy �=1 .: n A c N 529, , I N -. N r , 0I _ 55.64 1F 253.97 1 I —— . F.509,72i 7. E — —_ a I ._ 2.000 Ac.: 12000 Ac'f n r-- - - - - - - ---`R1 o (it " Ia N w 2943 Ac.: r� f —, 1 ... n. a� �I_ c COI tel.: Q 'O' ( to M1 N kri I -• \ tt O I aQQ• N .61 ' �L,s 1 H 6 hm M�—c. 89 .,'03" E, 9s�giz0-UI L234.e 4' =r ,-, C_2URTY floen Sin __rl_ .� _. _ 1 . t p •.. .YJ; `�._ w..d.. I . 1 I v I - VI I ` I• P1 h, h )i . I) I . 4 • \, .1 \' Iv 1b la t ..o -•'6: 6 { ) ` .1 t NI 0 41.., V I�� ^ ; J ?.I. y. Qv I fait, I•. J. t • y .2,I A F ri .i ' .... ....^/_f.o.9P,.SYS t u1 I •Si. y --- ---- -... ---- ' ;r ,,:y 91l' 0 1 + � 4@Y 3 • t 9\ •1 I . , 0 ` ' -1. t1 T . + I Is b ' '. 8 • e CW M, ,ri 1i I - S \ iI' .�( • J I ,.. .. .,p :. V IN c. I; roll '<LL' ) a C • I n IY -^___.N/-1_, ,. :__.�I 4.t. ,,r .. 1 4-,\..nyb„ • " L• —11 '•�; H . P I\; 44,L t A . -1 I 'I. ., 1\ 1 `I I�' a1 C• �,•. I 1.1 I • 'I ti v 4\Iji), • I • 3AO I �/� `.101 ., 4T 1�.-!_y+_,y,. 1.�- ';III I r.V 1 I.. ji_ /c 1� • 1 Crl '. / .bd I' 1 V% I-` • �Yi ,i•-S;P 1 - '•� flit .0 •O,.. ��M i,....-1- A ^ • .1 1 1� '1 • atr ✓na.-.uis.^ . _. ._. ..—.__._. _ . . . '"'-'d�.v;''.wry. I'•1. ✓'FGdr 3.C' .i3\G- /. 11 - I � .'11 C Ic ..C 'Its 1 : L _J1`v V- St,ti1S 1 y • 831902 • r--7,.;.7.1amr>�e" �W�, IMF Cn i��iii or y:s.,: f- 1 r� F Nr , 'r f� 111 1 4',...j1...... y�y• 4".1,11: ,i�� [_. 1i �'Q tr. Vy�1 �•;F s ' IV /14,. .-f• F •♦ .']r ii ♦j,•. !p. viL r. 7 ,i+3yR I: 1 L _,ill! :) ,.1 , �t^ -� Ii I+ y ".-;4 • r ;v. S11. , �•la•�N s ` TI4?F ° . •1•L::;.: i .,L.1.3., . ;,"..It;f.: A':2.'•1‘... '‘.' ''''.. Ili' ‘:1 t_ 3Y w"�p Tt1i 4_•t \'. —4,441....—• n,.ti` .. 4 r t ` 5 , )�•a Aw •:4'-;// i Ii t♦ ft IMr „:1/4,:t—,,..,.,.. ...t..•. 4a, y;°� il .,. i t vk17 c �^",.y.' r s i k "�AA • 4 '' LL 1\ 1:•! 7!, L'i;',11., Atr‘,C•f•s,'"k.E1,:-:-.-IsiVt'4,:'• �� I t ,t -, ♦ Yom.• t(';'r •- ! 'tlJ �'� {q r ! .r. }. •v �yi CC ... Ill fir. , , rr u xi 4 „ rr- i t '!•••$. dal ,'.I 1ti ♦ ,."ti.4i + d y.� ,�,ri 1 _ l t R an�i , ( ° I �r �s.. S z c it . •• 1j..w °rr_ 1pe,i a_J .) F. 1 a j {,iii 1�° 1 1 i i. L t't ir. ♦ :_?�ier'e� . 'fr �� . i P,`F7 ;r/l s'riiicr- .{ 11 II. •i 1 11 r .�,°• it 2J/` !))rv7(}Giff�!j1 Y,r�ri wiF F;' it .....t. T �� tyr 1-' • l'- • ' tt Y.' •`ye 'f J '' i1+ rt=' i�.• `�.' .y.5{. x i ..14 �f..�'C i'V EE .rF - . 4 ;p l Y �!"r�vl o� J I '1 . b Tt ::110g: • 71 ; IC ' '. :: 0F L r x ', 1 �' E• ' {y n r It yj � .�!a�• e t J ial �., y r < ' iL 'b. ♦ A. $L7Mirar Jf.V'LP x vs�' I • ,vk , r �• el •}yWi t• a$+ { tif FT* i I Jy rt4 7 1",�s•cifi,??vir lit i ''.4•';'.< .L.,4--;,:q:-' /{ y-' i♦_• ' " 5 may. ! _f� ` '.\ 8913 2 TRAFFIC STUDY I-25 SUBDIVISION AT DEL CAMINO PREPARED FOR: HAROLD REESE 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNEBROOK, N. Y. 11563 January 9, 1989 Rev. Feb. 21, 1989 JOB # A880311 89102 CONTENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS - ROADS 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS - TRAFFIC 3 SURROUNDING LAND USES 3 FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 3 ROLE OF THIS PROJECT 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 8910?2 INTRODUCTION 1-25 Subdivision is a proposed development of approximately 132 acres located west of I-25 and south of Colorado Highway 119 . The site is presently undeveloped. The property to the north is developed as mobile home park to the northwest and commercial to the northeast. Access is presently by way of the frontage road which also serves as the on-ramp to south bound I-25. Proposed development is mostly industrial, with some commercial uses. EXISTING CONDITIONS - ROADS Interstate 25 is a four lane highway running North-South and is east of the site. There is an existing paved 2 lane frontage road along the east side of the site which starts about 1/2 mile from the north boundary of the property and runs south. Colorado State Highway 119 (SH 119) is about 1/4 mile to the north. It presently intersects with I-25 with a diamond interchange. Traffic control is signalized. SH 119 is a paved 4 lane road with a 16 foot median except within the interchange, where it is 2 lanes. To the east of I-25, this road becomes County Road No. 24 (CR 24) , a paved 24 ' wide highway running east to US Highway 85. To the south about 300 feet is County Road 20 1/2 , a two lane unpaved road which runs west to County Road 7, a paved 2 lane road. CR 20 1/2 does not extend to the east. EXISTING CONDITIONS - TRAFFIC Current daily traffic volumes on SH 119 are approximately 16, 000 vehicles per day west of the easterly I-25 frontage road. SURROUNDING LAND USES The land to the South and West is being farmed. The land to the North is commercial, retail, and mobile home park. To the East on the other side of I-25 the present use is agricultural, but is in the process of being rezoned for commercial, business park, single family and modular home uses. FUTURE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 3 891002 Future trip generation rates were calculated for Phase 1 (1993) and Phase 2 (2010) . By the year 1993 , it was assumed that 25% of the project would be developed for commercial, manufacturing, light industrial, warehouse and truck terminal, and that by 2010 the project would be 100% complete. Trip generation rates per acre of use are shown on table I, along with the anticipated percentage of land for each use and the total daily trips and AM and PM peak hour trips. The attached diagrams show the site generated peak hour trips for each design point, and the total trips. The assumption was made that the vast majority of trips would be to SH 119 since this site is at the southern edge of the Weld County Mixed Use Development area and Activity Centers designated in — the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Trips generated by this project were added to the trips projected in the traffic study prepared by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig in October, 1988 for The Crossroads at Del Camino project which is being developed by Grant Brothers, Inc. on the East side of I-25. For the intersection of SH 119 and Turner Boulevard, traffic counts were obtained from the Colorado Highway department, and these numbers were added to site generated trips. Since the land is almost fully developed, it was assumed for the 2010 projection that the existing traffic would increase 25% to the existing businesses. According to the 1986 North Front Range Corridor Study prepared by the Colorado Highway Department, the I-25/SH 119 interchange should be reconstructed between 1991 and 1995. This would include relocating the east frontage roads and widening the I-25 bridges so that SH 119 would be a five lane road under the interstate. However, funding for bridge widening is not presently allocated. The study also recommends that the two-way traffic on the westerly south bound frontage road be eliminated. Based on these improvements, the maps Total Peak Hour Traffic and Service Levels were prepared. Phase 2 service levels at the PM peak hour drop to level E, or 100% of capacity under this scenario, however if the South bound West on-ramp to I-25 is reconfigured to two south bound lanes the level of service would rise. In the event that traffic volumes were still too heavy, the connection of Turner Boulevard to CR 20 1/2 could be completed, and much of the West bound traffic, especially from the South end of the project would then travel West to CR 7 or beyond while much of the south bound traffic would 4 89100'2 travel along the existing frontage road to the next interchange at SH 52 . ROLE OF THIS PROJECT _ The development of this project coincides with the plans to relocate the frontage road and eliminate the two-way traffic on the Westerly South-bound on ramp. Primary access will be via the relocated frontage road until Turner Boulevard is extended. Future improvements should include: Extend Turner Boulevard to the North boundary of the property and make it a public right-of-way. Extend Turner Boulevard South through the site, and connect to the existing frontage road which runs along the West side of I-25. Connection to the existing southerly frontage road would occur when the project is approximately 50% developed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Construction of I-25 Subdivision is scheduled to begin in the spring of 1989, when the entire site will be over lot graded. Streets and utilities for Phase 1, approximately 20 acres should be in place by fall 1989 . Actual absorption rates of space in this project will probably vary from the assumptions in this study, so flexibility in construction scheduling for street and highway improvements should be allowed to maximize the use of resources. An effort should be made to connect Turner Boulevard through to the project site. This, along with the proposed relocation of the frontage road as proposed by the highway department would help mitigate traffic impact on the area from this development. 5 8919"'2 APPENDIX 1LEVEL OF SERVICE: DEFINITIONS A: This is a condition of free flow, accompanied by low volumes and high speeds. Traffic density will be low, with uninterrupted flow speeds controlled by driver desires, speed limits, and physical roadway conditions. There is little or no restriction in maneuverability due to the presence of other vehicles, and drivers can maintain their desired speeds with little or no delay. B: This occurs in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation. Reductions in speed are not unreasonable, with a low probability of traffic flow being restricted. C: This is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. Most of the drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed, change lanes, or pass. A relatively satisfactory operating speed is still obtained, with service volumes suitable for urban design practice. D: This level of service approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained, though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. These conditions can be tolerated, however, for short periods of time. E: This cannot be described by speed alone, but represents operations at lower operating speeds, typically, but not always, in the neighborhood of 30 miles per hour, with volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of momentary duration. This level of service is associated with operation of a facility at capacity flows. F: This describes a forced flow operation at low speeds, where volumes are below capacity. In the extreme, both 1 Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice Louis J. Pignataro Prentice-Hall 1973 6 8910 2 speed and volume can drop to zero. These conditions usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from a restriction downstream. The section under study will be serving as a storage area during parts or all of the peak hour. Speeds are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion. 7 891002 O U) N O 10 O N 0 E u1 V' Os N in Ui H41 .'7. N UIMN V' CO am MMmMM N 0 r-I ulN 01 N U HHMMM HI M 4 H a 4M U) MelMMM 0 Z U7 V' MN O V' W M W H NO FN V' H__ ai 01 pj M0) 01 O) M en HNN N < H U t 1 4 � 01r10 (� V' a E M V' rHNH 0 rH .'l. U1 M N 1/40 r- 0 H 414 VD 0 0 HI to i - HH N O 4 M Z O1n 01ro 4 Z V• V' HNH N • H H H u1NN V' cr 4 Hv 101OM HI NN H H W H a .. a WP4 El N NM r- to E 1001 tf110rH W o p MM Lin H-H V' -. 4 0 O V' M IO d' 0 '"H N wo a X v x Z MIEN NH M Z tO01 0) 100 01 g H • 01 H M1 III r-I N rS 0 V' 0) tOM 01 H W H H a cn £ 01 H a' V O01 ' H O1 E rH01Mw to M .7 en en tf1 r1 V' E • . . . . t0 CON 10 r-I 0 H >1 V M ul In CO ,.a to H 4 Z A OIA ONO 0 Z H01O1OO u1 [a] rHNMNH 0 H MOO N ICI HI CO O H 4 0) O de, a a H a H a H U) H H U) H alto Z ax0 Z '000O) % 00 W 0 _ HEzmw HEz (nw a Et 4 E C.) OH 0 0) (n w w4 EA M g a flEMZ a - 0 z H 4 a 0 0 z H 4 Pa'. 0 U ZI-13E E UZi-73E E 8910. 2 I -_5 3LJhDIV.LS.[C1N F'HA aE 1 1 01 AL_ I I;-FF I C AM F-7..A1 HOUR VOLUMES LFJCAF.[ON: TURNER E L.VD °< 9H1 .19 . ' I . \ : .----- 492 -...- 4' ----- 81 •+ r i ? : 1 :1 144 : / AF F'RI LH LANE 1# .'OL i CR I T A... C,ROUF' L ME5 LANE VOL LEVEL F'H. PH. F'H. EASTBOUND i HRIJ 2 r2) o2il A 1 1 c:�i EcY B 1050 1000 9b`5 :::I. I — C 1'2(.31 i 1149 i 1100 SOUTHBOUND E=:1_ 1 ) 0 D 1.750 50 1275 1-1-'5 E:XR 1 0,) E 1.590 1425 17-5 THRU 1 0 F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL 1 171 :I.7.1 EXR 1 :144 3 WESTDOUND TI-vu 2 497 EXL 1 . 1 81 87.2 _ LEVEL OF EFRV I CLE A VOLUME/CAPACIT f 0. 58 - PHASE 1 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ' LDC;ATION: TURNER BLVD & SI-I119 ----. 754.. ' . 1 `, / : ,,--- -521 . l \ : 1 I 1 : ---- 177 () Cl O : 120 188 : / APPROACH LANE #i VOL/ CRIT T SVC. 2 7 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL F'H. PH. PH. _ EASTBOUND THRU 2 754. 754. A 900 855 025 EXR 1 1.70 B 1050 1090 9665 C 1200 1 140 1100 SOUTHE+OUND EXL 0 0 0 D 1350 1275 1225 EXR r) 0 E 1500 1425 1.75 THRU 0 0 F NA NA NA - NORTHBOUND EXL 1 120 120 EXR 1 188 WESTBOUND THRU 2 521 . EXL 1 177 1.77 I51 . LEVEL OF SERVICE A VOLUME/CAAF'r1C:r I Y 0. 45 _ 1 -25 ULLL ! L 1.LN F Hp SE 2 1 01 AL TRAFFIC , F'EAK I-IUUR VO1_lI"ILi LOCATION: TURNER BLVD Q, SH i 19 \ / ----- 2E3 -- 142 . / V \ . 1 i ____ 211 . (l a 0 : 174 • t5 tAF PROACH ' LANE # VOL/ CR I T SVC. 2 - 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. PH. EASTBOUND THRU 2 565. 565. A X700 855 825 EXR 1 142 B 1 050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 1100 ' - SOUTHBOUND EXL 1 0 0 D 1750 1 275 1 225 E: R 1 0 E 1500 1425 12;75 TH..;I_I 1 0 F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND LXL L 174 EXR 1 455 455 - WEOT'L,OL!ND THRU 2 2(:.,8 EXL 1 11 211 1211 LEVEL OF SERVICE U VOLUME/CAPACITY 0. 86 -- PHASE 2 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK: HOUR VOLUMES LOCATION: TURNER BLVD & SH119 ----, 522 : , 9 I 1 \ J / ---- .L.7f) 522 1 I . .---- 67.,E ----.- --- 142 : / V \ : ' , 211 . 0 0 0 : 204 602 : / -. APPROACH LANE # VOL/ CENT 'INC. 2 - Li GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. PH. EASTBOUND THRU 2 522 522 A 700 855 825 - EXR 1 142 B 1050 1000 Q65 r 1200 1140 11'?o SOUTHBOUND EXL 1 0 0 D 17.50 1275 1225 — EXR 1 0 E 15n0 1425 11:75 THRU 1 0 F NA NA NA _ NORTHBOUND EXL 1 DO- 2(14 EXR 1 6a WESTBOUND THRU 2 670 EXL 1 211 211 97 JJ1V2 LEVEL OF a;ERVILL- B VOLI-JME/CAPACITY 0 . 66 I: ..3 c LJ 1I?IV.LS [ON PHASE 1 1 LJ IIr1L_ T R FF :[C. OM FEAF:: F-IOLJR VULUME_=`3 L_OD: T IUN: WE+S ( RAMPS y, 1 -15 — 469 / V \ i i i ---- 140 0 / SVC. 2 �' 1I. APPROACH L.''iNE I0 VOL/ GRIT LEVEL F' . F'3 F'4 EVOL GROUP LANES LANE H. --__--_ ._. --_- EAETBtOUND THRIJ 2 450 450 A 900 855 225 EXF•: 1 469 B 1050 1000 965 C 1'2.'O 1140 1100 SOUTHBOUND EXL_ 1 140 140 D 1350 1275 1225 -X F-: 1 79 E 1 500 1425 1375 THRU 1 r_, F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL 0 0 `1 EXR 0 r^1 2 ,y-r WESTBOUND D TI-JRU - EXL 1 1.40 140 7 y;�. LEVEL OF 5 EFV I CE A - VOLUME!CAF'A+CITY 0. 51 - PHASE 1 TOTAL. TRAFFIC FM PEA:<:. HOUR VOLUMES LOCATION: I,JEST RAMPS ?, I-25 1 I 1 / ---- 527 , --- 6'7 / L,/ ---- ;0U 219 0 700 : i t 0 : / APPROACH LANE 14 VOL/ CF:IT SVC. 2 7 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. PH. - - EASTBOUND TH U 2 iL 4 474 A E 900 855 825 EXR 1 176 Es 1050 1000) 965 C 1 200 11403 1 100 SOUTHBOUND E:XL. 1 00 =:00 D 1:50 1275 1225 EXR 1 219 E 1500 1425 1:75 THRU 1 0 F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL 0 0 0 __ E::XR 0 0 WESTBOUND THRU 2 6'27 — EXL I. .:08 08 1042 891932 - LEVEL OF BERV I CE C VOLUME/C!'iF=ACI TV 0. 1-2::, AIL.,1)IEc.)II?N FN•i_:;E. 1 C.1 N_ TRAFFIC FE. )1, HOUR �.'OLL_htc_S LOL A F I ON: WE_S I RAMPS 1-25 :98 , \ / : , ----471 . ..fir-� v . . . ------ 1 9!) -- C T / y:J 0 295 0 0 . ' i-1FFRU(-.01 LANE # VOL_/ CR1 T SVC. 2 4 3ROUF' L r,NES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. F'H. E-.S BOUh1L 1 I'{F:U ._ __.--2 578 599- A 900 355 825 EXR 1 679 B 1050 1000 965 C 12f:)0 1140 1100 - SOUTHBOUND E\L 1 295 295 D 1750 1275 1225 EXF: 1 2.96 E 1500 1425 1775 -r HRU 1 !) F NA NA NA NOrTHFQUND EXL 0 Ci Ci EXR 0 0 WESTBOUND THRLI 2 471 . EXL 1 190 190 108= LEVEL OF SERVICE B VOLUME/CAPACITY 0. 76 PHASE 2 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM F'EAE: HOUR VOLUMES -- L!-=:AT I ON: WEST RAMPS °< 1-25 . 1 . • / ---- 7'._' -----. 677 . 7 . . . ----- 7-'7, -- 259 / v \ . . . . ----- 440 \ . 477 0 0 0 : / APPROACH LANE: # VOL/ GRIT SVC. 2 7 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. F'H. F'H. EASTBOUND THRU 2 677 677 A 9Q0 855 225 EXR 1 259 8 1050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 1100 SOUTHBOUND EXL 1 "55 55 D 1750 1275 1225 EXR 1 477 E 1500 1425 1775 THRIJ 1 0 F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL r.0 0 0 EXR 0 0 WESTBOUND THRU 2 727 EXL 1 440 44(1) 1772 - LEVEL OF SERVICE E • VOLUME/CAPACITY 0. 9' 83 .3' ;2 ._ I I-:..t )i- i. WI.—_ "..ii ;:: .E I_ r-ii I . ';...�-ll'. I` t_JI.II-.. VU,._'_ ._,. ;Cr=1I1OVI Li15T RIME-3 ? 25 __ / : \ ,u ,. 1 r : \ / : --- 115 4n0 r r r • 1 r r -_---- 169 i t_,:I V \ . I I I ---108. 7Q 0 E:1,.1 0 0 ,W:FOACI-I Lt,ra # VOL/ Cr:II T SVC. 2 = 4 C!kOLIF' LAHEIn LANE VOL LEVEL F.H. PH. PH. ,_========.,..====_,—..,===,.===,..-... EASTBOUNDTHRLI ._.. 2449. A 900 855 825 E; L 1 297 297 B 1050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 11000 SOUTHBOUND EXL 1 140 140 D 1750 1275 1225 L\R 1 79 E 1500 1425 1775 T T!HF'LI 1 0 F NP NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL 0 0 0 EAR 0 0 WESTBOUND THRU 2 115 — E);R 1 168. 1t8. 601 . LEVEL OF SERVICE A VOLUME/CAPACTTf 0. A2 F'!-?ASE 1 TO1 AL TRAFFIC PM PE Ab HOUR VOLUMES LOCATION: S/ST AMP': .. 1-27 ,__'1 . \ 1.)3 • 1' 1 ' \\ / : \---- 250 1 1 ---.• a 4 I I . I ; . .-- -- 767----. 4 V 1. 1 1 I 1 r . .---- -.74n7 1 1 : 709 705 . APPROACH LANE # VOL/ CRIT SVC. 2 - 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. F'H. PH. EASTBOUND THRU 2 4.74 A 900 855 825 EXL 1 108 108 B 1050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 1 100 — SOUTHBOUND EXL 0 D 1.50 1275 1225 EXR 0 E 1500 1425 1775 THRU 0 F NA NA NA NORTHBOUND EXL 2 709 709 E_:X R 1 250 WESTBOUND THF:U 2 767 767 784 LEVEL OF SERVICE A VOLUME/CAPACITY o.55 391Y2 _ l HO',3E:, 2 T01 AL i R-4-F'I C AM I-`EAF HOUR ':OLUMEL LOCATION: EAST RAMPS F --'2.`. / : \ ----/ 598 : 1 1 I : \•\ / : \---- 146 1 I 1 '1-e . , 1 1 11 1 i : ,---- 1613 ----. 4•.�•�I . 1 1 I . 11 1 ....-.�-. 427 : / V \ : 1i I 1 I I . --- '268 1 1 c 0 ,_) : 1:J2. 50 . _ APPROACHLANE # VOL/ CF I T EE. 2 3 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. PH. EASTBOUND EIDLIND THRU 2 427 A 900 855 825 EXL 1 598 598 E 1 050 1 000 965 C 1200 1140 1100 SOUTHBOUND EXL 0 0 ,) D 1;50 1275 1225 - EXR 0 0 E 154.10 1425 1375 THRU 0 0 F NA NA NA NIOR-f HI3OUND EXL 15 ' '6 EXR 1 75,J WE'ST1:'OLJND THRU 2 146 EXL I 2b8 26U 942 LEVEL OF SERVICE > VOLUME/CAPACITY 0?. `6 PHASE 2 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM F'EAF: HOUR VOLUMES LOCATION: EAST RAMPS 8< 1-25 • / . ice. j., I 1 1 1 ---- �}�4 --- V r16. . I 1 I . I I I 1` V ' 2 C) 0 0 . 4. _ 55 . APPROACH LANE # VOL/ GRIT s-c. 2 3 4 GROUP LANES LANE VOL LEVEL PH. PH. PH. EASTBOUND THRU 2 676. A 900 855 825 EXL 1 282 282 El 1050 1000 965 C 1200 1140 1100 5OU 11-1bOUND EXL 0 0 0 0 1350 1275 1225 EX. 0 0 E. 1 500 1425 1375 1 HF,U 0 0 F NA NA NA NORTHI OUNU EXL 2 4'2.3 211 . EXR 1 55 WESTBOUND THRU 2 342 342 EXR 1 765 875. LEVEL OF SERVICE El 891.0"2 - VOLUME/CAPACITY 0. 50 VICINITY MAP 0 0 w Z MEAD J J r � � CR 34 La z L D 0 {7 0 ? N UTE RD. m w O SH 66 :::.:. '• .• .• .....• .• . ... : '' : .:.. ::::. :.y::•:.: :•:.::: . • . .. . • • .• . . : H.:.::.::::::::::: - �• SH 119 CR 24 e f 0o z C) p CC w � SITE Z D fr- o o . FIRESTONE 0 O 3 = CO SH 22 : FREDERICK MINERAL RD. e ' :•j DACONO in JASPER RD. a vvi O CR8 1 V-- ERIE 0 PREPARED BY: SUTHERLAND, INC. 6456 SOUTH QUEBEC STREET BUILDING 5, SUITE 26 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 TEL. (303) 220-1533 83100.2 z O I D CO NI CL A U) U C O. H. N H. 0 00 r0 0 c O t N N 0 N II _ 25~ yN N ~ SITE I LJ rr) N \ \ Va in 0 Jrro cp cf) LJ L5o _ taN " O2 0 Y: UH � CL _ m w � 2o C O Q m N O N < cc U �= M b\ as moJO t0 CO .wF- in _Ito 2 W 831.0e2 LL Q ce O) O �- N Li., U Lva CP W Z Q W r n r, In co 3154 ...---- 91/24 — 25 /- ae n 3966 \L�-----g,6 -CS 1/66--6CZ/6£l SIT E co co I ft-) \\ 0 to L W O LI ct Qc. in to > W O to > Ob ° I Qrn ON\ Q � �M// nna = C9 O ( / d p J v U) Ds Lai t0 COW 1-- tO O \ cl Z W 0313' 2 . Ni I rn0 d ix - c c o IL c o J S U LlJ a 0 U) W 5 cc Q a W uj ~ z n o Q P f C r. ,^.I R a 1 000i J L a eiv4a. — 25 i- oo °� �c d \ ILmini-- isa SITE a ozvic, uc/cer—, od f s�r \\ gn C' €.!I 1 w o G v) N N 2 Wo m ~ w ~ oI • x--- 0— o g m N 20 N a 4,1 fro V) En Q i iSoo" ata0Lao Cs LLI 1— i CO J CD Z W 89130 2 U L� u- Q O o - d N N a I w N p 0 w (n w Z Q Le,' Nr c N N fD _ 1t, to ti Leven/ - 25 ,, -LOL/LLl 82`/902 51 # �\ a*\/ss--- i BSS/98£-C£B/484 SIT E L09/1L6�\ \o �\ 10 L W O d' <D Xn V NCD I-41 0 r G m O O fn N d N 2 0 U M Q p p o t N D 3 J IA j CO ifiiii i- m O Z 831Y 2 r. O O E 7 N `` a N ..._., H. in N 0 U W YQ 0 w 5 Qw J N I = 0 _ n N m a n o a _ e Inc O 03 g1r rte°, _,..i. c. 2 ood r } S m n IG — 25 0 01i�h m mn --Sit t ss2 m N. "" I 09 lg9 tri rel. z09/gar S I I E co \��oz/ruz96/Isis m� �+,,r \ \ \ o0 ti - r Y 0 C. W 0 N N UU n LO o 5 ;.: ° w as r— > m m D x O n 1 N N r- LL W D -I N \ X 0100,-, d a l C9 U rn 0 J Ci) li co m W H ill J \ (O 0 co Z * W I 891302 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. • COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within -- five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been -- assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date. WELD COTyV MP{�N LE COY' l p BY: /y_'�`/ /' The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 10th day of March . 1989 WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 9� t41 plc) (K. / / / Notary Public 8910'_2 Planned Unit Development Change of Zone NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER MOUNTAIN EMPIRE DAIRYMEN'S 12450 Washington Street ASSOCIATION, INC. , A COLORADO Thornton, CO 80241 CORPORATION 1313-10-1-00-001 MUSTARD & ASSOCIATES P. 0. BOX 53 EL RANCHO GOLDEN, CO 80501 1313-10-0-00-006 SUSURAS, HELEN P. 0. BOX 84 DACONO, CO 80514 1313-10-1-00-018 SHERWOOD, DONALD J. 120 9TH AVENUE LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-10-1-00-019 DALTON, C. RICHARD & P. 0. BOX 36 MARY J. NEWARK, MO. 63458 1313-10-1-00-020 RIVER VALLEY MOBILE HOME 3294 HIGHWAY 119 PARK LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-10-1-00-037 - CAMENISCH, PHILLIP E. 10504 WELD COUNTY ROAD 7 LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-10-1-00-039 SAME SAME 1313-10-1-00-040 REESE, HAROLD, JR. & RONALD LANE & 855 SUNRISE HIGHWAY MCCULLOCH, CHRISTINE REESE LYNBROOK, NY 11563 1313-10-1-00-041 SAME SAME 1313-10-1-00-042 - GRANT BROTHERS BOX 948 LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-11-0-00-001 (pt) FIFTHCOFF COMPANY 436 COFFMAN STREET LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-11-0-00-001 (pt) THE RAWLINS NATIONAL BANK P. 0. BOX 100 RAWLINS, WYO 82301 1313-11-0-00-022 FLATIRON STRUCTURES 10090 1-25 FRONTAGE ROAD COMPANY LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-11-0-00-023 AZALEA FARMS, LTD. 4862 KELLOGG CIRCLE c/o EDWIN C. MCDOWELL, JR BOULDER, CO 80303 1313-11-0-00-050 - TRUST UNDER WILL OF CARL R. 14707 N. 95TH STREET OSWALD LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-11-0-00-057 BIGELOW, FRANK S 33.333% DEL CAMINO CENTER PARTNERSHIP 33.333% KANEMOTO, EDWIN S. 16.667% KANEM0TO, KENNETH 8.667% NEENAN,-DAVID G. 4% 203 S. MAIN STREET NEENAN, JAMES J. 4% LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-14-0-00-005 (pt) WESTERVELT, JAMES T. , JR 9536 1-25 ACCESS ROAD E & CAROLYN SUE LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-14-0-00-005 (pt) 89142 iii HI 50 N _ •uCc r.C r';'�=FS OF ^r .,?ter.T Y i . _. Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION - OLANDER, HERBERT M. 250 RIVER LOOP #1 1313-14-0-00-054 EUGENE ORE 97404 KUEHN, DARYL E. 3909 WCR 201 1313-15-0-00-022 _ & DONNA G. LO G C 8 0 ANGLEO, SAM & 3711 WCR 201 1313-15-0-00-024 JIMMIE JOAN LONGMONT CO 80501 10505 WCR 117 1313-15-0-00-025 -- CAMENISCH PHILLIP E. LONGMONT CO 80501 HOPPER, MARVIN D. & SHARON K. 1 in -- JOHNSON, VERNER A. & 3656 WCR 20' 8 5 1 1313-15-0-00-073 A Y HOPPER, MARVIN D. & 1313-15-0-00-074 _ S S REESE, HAROLD, JR. & 855 SUNRISE HWY 1313-15-0-00-094 YNBROOK NY 11563 MCCULLOCH, CHRISTINE REESE 1313-15-0-00-095 MCDANIEL, RODNEY R. 9762 I-25 Access Road E 1111_1a_n-nn-onr • N. ERNESTINE Lon mon GRIFFIN, FREDERICK H. 9748 I-25 ACCESS ROAD E & LYNDA TRIPP 9518 1-25 ACCESS ROAD McBriRe Larry L &i a LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-14-0-00-008 • • 891CC 2 AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property STATE OF COLORADO ) • ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lesses of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. WIELD CO TITLE C,f ,, 2/11 ji f " W(. Y/ The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this loth day of March 1989 . WITNESS my hand and official seal. 7c)_ - My Commission expires: KC/otary/Public (� 8910`;-2 r.r r•r; PS OF DPnPERTY WITHIN 501 . "_- Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION OLANDER, HERBERT M. 250 RIVER LOOP #1 1313-14-0-00-054 EUGENE, ORE 97404 KUEHN, DARYL E. 3909 WCR 201/21313-15-0-00-022 & DONNA G. LONGMONT, CO 80501 ANGLEO, SAM & 3711 WCR 201/2 1313-15-0-00-024 JIMMIE JOAN LONGMONT, CO 80501 10505 WCR #7 - CAMENISCH, PHILLIP E. LONGMONT, CO 80501 1313-15-0-00-025 HOPPER, MARVIN D. & SHARON K. (z int) - _ JOHNSON, VERNER A. & 3656 WCR 201/21313-15-0-00-073 ADELYN D. (3 int) LONGMONT. CO 80501 HOPPER, MARVIN D. & 1313-15-0-00-074 SHARON K. SANE - REESE, HAROLD, JR. & 855 SUNRISE HWY 1313-15-0 00-094 RONALD JANE. & LYNBROOK, NY 11563 MCCULLOCH, CHRISTINE REESE SAME SAME 1313-15-0-00-095 8910'9'2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO P. O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 9/7/89 NOTICE MAILED FIRST CLASS TO: HERBERT M. OLANDER 1800 LAKEWOOD COURT, #63 EUGENE, OR 97402 891002 • 8/25/83 COPY OF-NOTICE SENT FIRST -CLASS TO:-= BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO P. O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 MARVIN D. 5 SHARON K. HOPPER - - 3656 WELD COUNTY ROAD 201 LONGMONT, CO 80501 891002 • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO P. 0. BOX 758 GREY, COLORADO 80632 McCARTY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2229 JEWEL STREET LONGMONT, C0 80501 G. ,3C2 Hello