HomeMy WebLinkAbout830390.tiff AR-1931623ORDINANCE NO. 108
PERMIT NO . 83-23
PERMIT FOR PLOWING GRASSLAND
APPLICANT NAME: Kenneth Heimann Larry L. & Joann E. Skaggs
(renter) (owners) " a
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 220 15325 W. 48th Avenue
Pierce, CO 80650 Golden, CO 80401
and v
Gary Hoerner a 747
8113 Ammons Way m n
Arvada, CO 80005 -41
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CULTIVATED (Map delineating z k
the proposed land use change attached) : zr..
m
Part of Eh NE4 Section 19 , T8N, R66W (60 acres) rnw
c-; c
z
n ,
— w
APPROVED SOIL CONSERVATION PLAN ATTACHED. Yes
Z C
PERMIT ISSUED BY THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
'ii
Larry & Joann Skaggs - per attached letter r a
Landos(n_erh. permission granted * .
, ,c � f `?Y; { �; TO
(_, ,
s z\2�J, 3 Weld Cour t' Clerk & Recorder
\ and Clerk to the Board oril �)y , it, y III 1^ Y7
ys )� By adetz‘z, W?"
Deputy CTounty k 4.
Renter
This permit is issued pursuant to Weld County Ordinance No . 108
adopted by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners
on May 19, 1982 , and requiring the issuance of permits for
the plowout and cultivation of grassland. Pursuant to Ordi-
nance No. 108 , the landowner is required to follow a conserva-
tion plan approved by the local Conservation District Board.
The landowner is advised to contact the local Soil Conserva-
tion District Board for any amendments or updates to the
Conservation Plan .
830390
/71
Township _ _g e rt.L. , Range to (t J e 5 L , County l...4.)-'-'LC1-____ ____ ,State C10 Cel O . ,
ORDINANCE NO. 108
PERMIT NO. 83-23
1 i
Ii 1 1
I 1
I1I_ J4
T___,________ I._
I i
_
I f
I I
_ _.. ___. _.__E t t I____,...__/
I L I
. r
I
J i
•
---6----72---S--- - n .. ... _ -....I ,I .--1
I
-I. ! _ I I........ .. ..... ...._.... -r
1 E
#
ei�I 1
I i
I
_ r _ -- — =s . . -r =o_--_-. =s�
I
i I
I
'
I , I
I I
II I
I
I I l i
FORM SOF
.(-a 1000 I E:(l 01931623 06/27/03 16 : 16 $0..00 2/025
F / 220 MARY i>iNt F•I:::I.II:=:I ;Y1••f":::NJ CLERK Yt RECORDER WELD CO, CO
NMI
West Greeley Soil Conservation District
P.O. Box 86 - Greeley, Colorado 80632
RESOURCE OR LAND USE PLAN REVIEW
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER '
Name: Kenneth Heimann Name: Larry L. & Joann E. Skaggs _.
Address: P.O. Box 220 Address: 15325 W. 48th Ave. --
Pierce, CO 80650 Golden, CO 80401 Fri
AND �.
c-..
DATE OF REVIEW: June 13, 1983 Gary Hoerner
8113 Ammons Way
ACREAGE BY LAND USE IN CONSERVATION PLAN: Arvada, CO 80005
s
721
60 ac. of grassland to be converted to Non-Irrigated Cropland
m
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CULTIVATED: (Map delineating the proposed land use
change attached)
M 4
60 ac. in Ez NE4 Section 19, T8N, R66W
PLAN DISPOSITION: Conservation plan approved as presented.
COMMENTS:
$ . L ;S. WEST GREELEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD
% O
.*
ff,' 13 y:
�p4 R 1. 4 p�-.
pisvaiy
• • CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF.(;OVERNMENT (ReV. 4/83)
mi
March 3, 1983
o
We agree to let Kenneth Heiman farm the 40 acres described below:
(The NZ of the NZ of the NE3 of section 19, in Township 8 North, m
Range 66 Westoof the 6th P. M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. )
If at any time Kenneth Heiman decides not to farm the land, we
want it returned to its original state of grass . The crop is
to be devided 3/4 to Kenneth Heiman and 1/4 to Larry and Joann — ''
Skaggs.
C
z -J
C7. OD
Larr L. SkagOwner
7-,
o
?t.
Skaggs-Q*0er C2 d90..A.t.A..," o
Witnes
m
£ 0
Kenneth Heiman--Renter
o0
C UI
March 5,1983
Larry Skaggs
15325 W. 48th Ave.
Golden, Colorado 80401
Dear Mr. Skaggs,
I've gone over your property here in Weld County, Section 19-Township 8N,
Range 66 in regards to wheat farming, Upon checking with the ASCS Office,
it will have to be strip farmed. Due to heavy foliage and rough terrain,
it would make good pasture land on strips that cannot be farmed into wheat.
As pasture land, the County Agent has informed me that due to my expense
of having to fence and provide water, the pasture land charge for cattle
would be $5.00 per head per month. My land that I pasture I use in the
wintertime along with the wheat land. This is the best way to utilize
this land. The County Agent also informed me that the proper way to
share/rent wheat crop is 1/4 owner & 3/4 renter, due to the renter having
to break up and work this land to prepare for planting wheat.. If this is
all agreeable to you, would you please sign one copy and send it back to
me along with any added remarks you may want to add.
Sincerely yours ,
Kenneth Heimann
�, •
•
Larry Skaggs
B 1 000 REC 01931623 06/27/03 16 : 16
30 i)(7 1 1 /t)NARY FiNN IF..:UI:::RSTI_::I:N CLERK & RI:::CORDI:EK UJH I) i:;U, LU
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-CPA-68
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
1 -82
RECORD OF COOPERATORS DECISIONS
AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION
PLANNED APPLIED
FIELD MONTH LAND USE AND TREATMENT
NO. AMOUNT YEAR AND -
YEAR CTU #1 Non-Irrigated Cropland Field 2 (60 ac., — _
2 60 ac. 1983 CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEM: A cropping system of - --
winter wheat - fallow will be instituted in alter- 3 r.
nating strips across field.
r
2 60 ac. 1983 FIELD STRIPCROPPING: 180 foot wide strips will be D. �
established with strips running in north to south z
direction. This will provide a 260 foot wind
distance. _
2 60 ac. 1983 CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT: Crop residues will be 7.1
maintained on or near soil surface with subsurface -: a
tillage implements to maintain residue amount of '
750 pounds per acre flat small grain stubble. z
2 60 ac. 1983 CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM: Minimum tillage will
be utilized. Tillage operations will be limited to 22
only those essential for weed control and seedbed ~ v
preparation and limited to 3-4 operations prior
to planting. T C.
77 C
CTU #2 Rangeland Field 1 (90 ac.)
1 90 ac. 1983 PROPER GRAZING USE: Pasture will be grazed during
summer months and Blue grama will be utilized by
grazing 50% of current years growth leaving 50%. ^ b
COOPERATORKenny Heimann, et al. ASSISTED BY Ronald D. Miller DATE 6/83
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado All Field Offices
March 1983
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEM (acre) 328
Definition - w Specifications
Growing crops by using a 1. Dry CroplandNi 0
combination of needed cultural and ..
management measures. Cropping a. A cropping sequence such r
systems include rotations that
as wheat-fallow, wheat-
contain grasses and legumes, as sorghum-fallow or other
well as rotations in which the systems will be applied
desired benefits are achieved that will provide adequate z r
without the use of such crops, residue for protection
from wind and water �?
Purpose erosion. m "`
^, v
To improve or maintain good b. Crop residues will be
physical condition of the soil; managed in such a way that
protect the soil during periods soil loss is held to an _z
when erosion occurs; help control acceptable amount.
weeds, insects, and diseases; and
meet the need and desire of c. The Universal Soil-Loss
farmers for an economic return. Equation and Wind Erosion
Formula will be used to
Conditions where practice applies determine adequacy of the cropping system.
On all cropland and on certain recreation and wildlife areas. 2. Irrigated Cropland m
z0
Planning Considerations a. The Soil Condition Rating £ v
MO
Indices for Irrigated Crops , —_
An application of nitrogen should Agronomy Technical Note 1 .52,
be considered in the early stages will be used to determine
O Chi
of a high residue management the adequacy of the cropping
program to replace that tied up in sequence and soil fertility
the decomposition process. management. 4) :J
TGN f; .L®`
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
n "s'- Colorado All Field Offices
February 1982
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION -
CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM (Acre) 329 ,., ^
h u
Standard
T r
v 171
Definition n
A form of noniversion tillage that 1 . Zero tillage, slot planting or z 'Y%
retains protective amounts of residue no-till. z -
mulch on the surface throughout the mflN
TIM
year. These include no-tillage, strip This is a method planting into =
tillage, minimum tillage and other prior crop residue by disturb- N
types of noninversion tillage. in only the immediate area of `o.-
g o.-
the row. Crop residue is left N.
Purpose on the surface for erosion z
control. M`
To protect the soil from erosion and _= rA
help maintain or develop good soil 2. Strip tillage. i
tilth, and desirable water infiltra-
tion rates and water storage. Tillage operations for seedbed J
preparation are limited to a -: A.
Conditions where practice applies strip not to exceed one-third
or
of the distance between rows.
::. On cropland and on certain other A protective cover of crop
lands where annual vegetation is residue remains on the z.
grown. balance. Tillage and planting z
are accomplished in the same
Planning considerations operation.
Conservation tillage provides a pro- 3. Minimum Tillage ^ .a
duction system that leaves crop resi-
dues on the surface after planting. Limiting the number of tillage o
Crop residues are left standing as operations to those essential
long as possible prior to the succeed- to control weeds, improve soil
ing crop to trap blowing snow. Herbi- aeration, permeability and
cides are used immediately following tilth. Sweeps, rod weeders or
harvest, prior to and during planting, straight shank chisel imple-
to control volunteer grain and other ments will be used.
vegetation.
Specifications
This practice is most effective when
carried out in conjunction with other A. The primary objective is to
practices such as strip cropping, accomplish weed control with
terracing and contour farming. no tillage or with a limited
number of conservation tillage
One of the following conservation operations, so that adequate
tillage systems should be used: amounts of crop residue can be
maintained for protection from
erosion.
TGN #182 2/82
329-2-Conservation Tillage System
B. The minimum amount of crop residue left on the soil surface after
planting shall be 1 ,500 pounds per acre of corn or sorghum residue, or
500 pounds per acre of flat small grain residue or its equivalent.
C. Soil loss by water and wind shall be reduced to the loss tolerance
established for that soil. The Universal Soil Loss Equation and the
Wind Erosion formula can be used to arrive at the amount of residue
necessary to keep the soil loss within limits.
Table 1 — A Guide for Estimating Residue Reduction from Tillage Operations x ^
Approximate Percent of T
Residue Reduction After
Tillage Operation One Trip or Pass Over
the Field z
Rod W z w
eeder
10 rri
Sweeps (30" or more) - u
Rod Weeder and Semichisel 10
Field Cultivator 15
(16-18 inch sweeps)
Till Planter 25
Chisel Plow (straight shanks) 20
20
Chisel Plow (twisted shank)
50
One—Way or Tandem Disc
Z
Moldboard Plow 50
---- ------ 75 100
D. On systems where tillage operations are permitted:
44`
1. Subsurface tillage equipment should be used to keep the residue on 0
the soil surface.
2. On soils that tend to crust, or with some slope to them, a chisel
type implement may need to be used after harvest to increase water
infiltration and reduce soil loss due to runoff.
3. Chemicals may be used to aid in reducing or eliminating tillage
operations. Use manufacturers labels or Colorado Weed Control
Handbook for specific rate recommendations. The following options V
are recommended. ci
a. Fall sweep (4 inches deep) plus Atrazine. Fall sweep
immediately (within two weeks) after wheat harvest to kill
existing vegetation. Atrazine applied immediately following
fall sweep will kill volunteer wheat and weeds until the next
summer. Limit summer tillage operations prior to planting.
b. Apply a combination of non—selective contact or non—residual
herbicides (such as Paraquat or Roundup) plus Atrazine to kill
existing weeds and for long—term weed control. Limit summer
tillage operations.
Nowti
TGN #182 2/82
Conservation Tillage System 329-3
c. Contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short residual
(45-60 days) may be used for spring application to eliminate
early spring and early summer tillage. Limit summer tillage
operations.
d. 2-4D Butyl Ester plus atrazine or a short residual triazine is
an economical alternative if approximately 90% of the fall weeds —
are broadleaf. Limit summer tillage operations.
ra
E. For no-till systems: ca
37-7
1 . Conventional tillage operations will not be used to control volun- r
teer crop growth or annual forbs and grasses. On soils with a heavy n
clay or silty surface that tend to seal, a light crust breaking may 0
be needed using sweeps or a chisel using straight shanks. Z
zc
a. Wheat-fallow (chemical only) - Use of chemicals to eliminate 71 c.
r ;.y
tillage operations. The following is required: C c�
(1) Contact herbicides, such as Paraquat or Roundup, plus o-
atrazine or residual and tank mixes such as atrazine-Bladex m `•
and atrazine-Igran shall be applied immediately following z
harvest to kill existing weeds and give long-term weed
control.
(2) A short residual herbicide may be used for spring applica-
tion C,
if necessary to control weeds to substitute for
tillage operations normally used. T
(3) A slot or no-till planter or grain drill shall be used that
will disturb not more than 25% of the soil surface.
z
b. Corn, sorghum, and small grains (chemical only) . Use of chemi-
cals to eliminate tillage operations in irrigated cropland or
annual cropping systems. The following is required: c
(1) A contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short o o•
residual (45-60 days) may be used for spring application if
needed to control weeds to eliminate early spring and early „ .
summer tillage.
(2) A slot or no-till planter or adequate grain drill shall be
used that will disturb not more than 25% of the soil
surface.
(3) Atrazine may he used in a wheat-sorghum-fallow or a wheat-
corn-fallow sequence.
F. Farmers must be made aware of the hazards involved in using residual
herbicides.
TGN #182 2/82
• w
.
329-4-Conservation Tillage System
1 . Caution must be exercised in use of atrazine on soils with a pH of
7.5 or higher.
2 . Caution should be taken when applying long residual herbicides
annually so no overlap or carry-over effect of chemical occurs.
3 . A minimum of 20 gallons of water, preferably 30, will he needed to
get adequate coverage of chemical.
4 . For more uniform application, large volume sprayers with wide stable
boom coverage are preferred over small units with narrow coverage.
The wider swath should result in fewer overlaps or skips. Dust
should be held to a minimum as it deactivates some herbicides.
Nozzle spacing should not be greater than 40 inches for uniform
distribution.
G. Specific chemical recommendations shall be in accordance with container
labels and/or Colorado Weed Control Handbook.
Trade names were used in this standard only to make the information more
understandable. This does not imply endorsement of certain products or
criticism of products not named or mentioned.
B 1000 Iz:F:C 01931623 31623 06/27/83 16 : 16
F.. i ?3`i MARY FINN F•I_:IJI::R T'f::::I N CLERK 2N RECORDERWELD CO, CO fi�
j
TGN #182 2/82
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado All Field Offices
April 1983
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
STRIPCROPPING, FIELD (acre) (Code 586)
Standard Planning Considerations
0
Definition Steepness of slope, soil factor , o..
the normal amount and intensity
r:
Growing crops in a systematic of rainfall and the width of the
arrangement of strips or bands farm equipment are factors to
across the general slope (not on consider in determining width of
the contour) to reduce water strips. z c:
erosion. The crops are arranged
r.
so that a strip of grass or a Generally. this practice must be T
close-growing crop is alternated supplemented with other practices
with a clean-tilled crop or such as crop residue management or
fallow. conservation tillage. z, ,T
T N.
Purpose Grassed waterways may be essential -.;
to control water erosion in areas u;
To help control water erosion and of concentrated flow. r-- h
runoff on sloping cropland where
contour striperopping is not Grass buffer strips can be used in
practical. conjunction with the striperop- 2°
ping system. The advantage of a: a
Conditions where practice applies using grass buffer strips can be r
reflected in the cropping system '=
7.1
On sloping cropland and on by using the "P" valves listed
ri7 u--
certain recreation and wildlife below:
land.
Land Slope Percent of Field in Grass Buffer Strips (-) -
Percent 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% u
-
1 to 2 .55 .50 .40 .35 .30 r"v
3 to 8 .45 .40 .35 .30 .25
9 to 12 .55 .50 .40 .35 .30
13 to 16 .65 .55 .50 .40 .35
17 to 20 .70 .65 .55 .50 .40
21 to 25 .80 .70 .65 .55 .45
TGN 202
Striperopping, Fie" #586-2
-2-
Specifications
Field strip cropping using alternating strips of crops and residue in a
rotation.
1. The Universal Soil Loss Equation as presented in Agronomy Technical Note
#50 (revised) will be used to determine strip widths. Striperopping alone
or in combination with other tillage or management practices is an _
acceptable alternative for reducing soil erosion to tolerable limits.
2. Maximum strip widths will not exceed 330 feet (20 rods) for slopes of 5%
or less or 198 feet (12 rods) for slopes exceeding 5%.
3. Strips should be of equal width and the general pattern should be across
the slope of the field.
4. Strips shall not deviate from the true contour by more than one half the z u
land slope. -a 4.
;145. When grass buffer strips are used they will be planted according to the -
Standards and Specifications for Pasture and Hayland Plantings — Code
OC
512. -
rn
xi
rn
:T:
fl
M
73
:T.: 0
C w
i l M.v
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
on Soil Conservation Service Technical Guide
Colorado Section IV
All Field Offices
October 1981
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CROP RESIDUE USE - (ac.) 344
Definition B. Each field will be evaluated for _-
potential wind and water erosion Using plant residues to protect using the Wind Erosion Curves and x m
cultivated fields during critical the Universal Soil Loss Equation. T "'
erosion periods.
o
C. If only one of the erosion D.
Purpose hazards z
(wind or water) is signifi-
cant, the land treatment will be To conserve soil moisture, increase planned so that erosion from neither soil infiltration, reduce soil loss, wind nor water will exceed the
ifi
and improve soil tilth. designated "T" value for that soil.
r.-- ..7'
Condition where practice applies D. If both wind and water erosion m
are significant in a given field, z Ni
On land where crop residues are land treatment shall be planned so _^ w
produced. that the total soil loss from wind 1,'4
vi
and water does not exceed the desig—
Specifications nated "T" value. -
I. Non-Irrigated Small Grain - Use E. If the treatment is planned to the "Guide for Wind Erosion Control control wind erosion the technician on Cropland" or Agronomy Note #53 will record (1) the amount of for guidance on amounts of residue ^
residue required on the soil surface _required on the soil surface during at planting time, (2) the unshel-
e
the critical wind erosion season. tered distance usually described as
- .v
This will normally be considered as field width perpendicular to the
o
the amount of flat small grain prevailing winds, (3) rough-
stubble equivalent residue after the ness factor, i.e. , unridged,
planting operation.
`
v
A. To calculate residue require- F. If the treatment is planned
,.v
primarily control erosion,
meats, average the annual soil loss the technician will develop alterna-for the entire rotation or wheat- tives in accordance with the
fallow cropping system. This method Universal Soil Loss Equation for (1)
will show the benefits of residue length of slope (2) cropping
management for the entire cropping management factor and (3) erosion
system. If this method is used the control practice factor.
wind erosion curves will determine
the amount of residue needed but in
no case will the minimum requirement
be less than 500 lbs. per acre of
flat small grain stubble equivalent
oeTh-- at planting time.
it
TGN #178
344-2 Crop Residue Use
C. Planning Considerations
1 . Subsurface tillage equipment such as sweeps, blades and
rodweeders should be used for most tillage operations.
2. Chemical weed control to reduce the number of tillage operations
is beneficial in managing the residue.
3. Reducing field widths is an effective way to reduce the need for
large amounts of crop residue.
4. When inadequate residue is produced the soil surface will be
ridged by chiseling or listing.
II. Non-Irrigated Sorghums
A. Pounds of residue required through the critical wind erosion period
(November-May).
Minimun Required
Crop and Spacing Residue
1. Drilled sorghums on row 750#
spacing of 20" or less
2. Forage sorghum on 1000#
20" - 40" rows
3. Grain sorghum on 150011
20" - 40" rows
When the above residue requirements are met, the practice will be considered
adequate to hold the soil loss to the acceptable "T" level.
B. Planning Considerations
1 . The above amounts of residue will be left on the soil surface
through May or until spring seedbed preparation which usually
occurs in early April. Spring seedbed preparation should result
in a ridged surface for wind erosion protection.
2. When inadequate residue is produced the soil surface will be
ridged by chiseling or listing. Soils coarser than sandy loam
usually require listing to provide satisfactory surface
roughness.
3. Grazing will be restricted on machine harvested crops when
marginal amounts of residue are produced.
USDA/SCS/Colorado/ 10/81 TGN /1178
13 1000 RE C 01 9:31 62 06/:.:?7/H::i 16 : 16 *O..00 '1 /02
F 1239 NARY ANN FE:1.11:::ERST :IN CLERK K & RECORDER WELD CO, Co
Crop Residue Use 344-3
III. Irrigated Crops
Ar mo,
A. The pounds of residue required on the soil surface during the
critical erosion period are as follows.
Wind Erodibility Drilled Crops
Groups 20" rows or less Row Crops
1 & 2 1500
3 & 4 2500
1000 1750
5, 6 & 7 750 1000
B. Critical Erosion Periods (Modified for Necessary tillage)
1. W.E.G. 's 1&2 Sprinkler Irrigated - Maintain the required amounts z j T,
of residue until the planted crop has enough }
the soil. g growth to protect
2. Gravity Irrigated Row Crops - Maintain the required amounts of
residue as long as feasible after harvest. The cropping system >u
and method of irrigation are to be considered. If fall plowing
destroys the residue, the field will be left rough and cloddy
until spring seedbed preparation, (about March 1st as a
rn
minimum).
� >v
z
ow
z
4
270,
J
trI
7.1
1 �₹
£rri
O I.y
CM
4 1 M
C U.
TGN 1/178 USDA/SCS/COLORADO/ 10/81
- er+ ,1
--1-1-7,---M-F-1-
I [ , f..ke.i₹ � , A \.'4\i V I I . ;-'. ! 4,I ry 4i
Aa SCS-CONS-I6 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE '
JJ OCTOBER 1974 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICEfl
Larry L. & Joann E. Skaggs A
Gary doerner CONSERVATION PLAN MAP '?'s
Munon & Rosalind Chang D c
Owner Operator Kenneth Heimann e
County Weld State Colorado Date 6/1983
Approximate acres. 160 ac. Approximate scale 8" = 1 mi.
Cooperating with West Greeley Conservation District
Plan identification Section 10, TSN, RG6W Photo number ASCS Photo G-13
Assisted by Ronald P. P•Hller USDA Soil Conservation Service
III
lA
rn
1 Silt
_ liLLI
G 95
Q 90 4c- I t" I -Z U`
a RINNGtI_RND, , :. J. ? ,(cis` RcA �
o = ,I isIk
i ' ,'
. J �f u /j4►9SL�f{M ,
r yY } 0 'v' . 1 e
`lll
a .ai Ir I ,t,, t 1'',I .
'1. y I w,e d Y
�.93 �;• °IA
� t ' &95U h. 1
�e p.' ss:' y.). , F
11-1p 1 , A, ? r �u 4`�H,
..-1 W 7 I ri JJ,1.,
ss c \ R P P .I i •P 1P P I a
X99 �1� " ,y,7 N��y,s 9.9 go, �: p ,
March 5,1983
Munon & .Rosalind Chang
Hawaiian Mission of SDA
P.O. box 4037
Honolulu, Hawaii 96795
Dear Mr. & Mrs . Chang,
I've gone over your property here is Weld County Section 19-Range 66-
Township 8 N. in regards to wheat farming. Upon checking with the ASCS
Office it will have to be stripped farmed. Due to heavy foliage and
rough terrain, it would make good pasture land on strips that cannot be
farmed into wheat. As pasture land, the County Agent has informed me
that due to my expense of having to fence and provide water, the pasture
land charge for cattle would be $5.00 per head per month. My land that
I pasture I use in the wintertime along with the wheat land. This is
the best way to utilize this land. The County Agent also informed me
that the proper way to share/rent wheat crop is } owner & 3/4 renter,
due to the renter having to break up and work this land to prepare for
planting wheat. If this is all agreeable to you, would you please sign
original copy and send back to me along with any added remarks you may
have.
Sincerely yours,
Kenneth Heimann
PC. jdtc ),-.2,0
��r,✓tear - [! / /L1 -2t )ztt io
�/ �ea�tJ U o
FAZ¢ eSo_3- /341 -/s7
711SePtCrl'iN
ROsa/,;,iiecEe le-.c-;,,. �.Zrs
&h . &vat ezr... .
X3 4 {i()<) fiE::(v 4)i ' :iiF ': () ,/ ''71k:3; 1 / 16 $0, 00 �.'.4/{'?:'5
rI HEC 1NN 2Ei:Ii0rf:::.T.P.� f:;L..ERK & RECORDER WELD CO , CO
Hello