HomeMy WebLinkAbout840499.tiff ORDINANCE NO. 108
ARb9db798 PERMIT NO. 84-19
PERMIT FOR PLOWING GRASSLAND
APPLICANT NAME: Lillian C. Allmer
76
ADDRESS: 51294 In
Briggsdale, CO 80611
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CULTIVATED (Map delineating
' the proposed land use change attached) :
Wz Section 36, alcwmship 7 North, Range 60 West
APPROVED SOIL CONSERVATION PLAN ATTACHED. Yes
PERMIT ISSUED BY THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF WELD COUNTY, COLORADO.
177110.4)..At atwt444,,t,444Y.,-41,eirrif:/\'
ettc c . a",„/„.../ Weld Cithnty Clerk & Ate o rH
eli
5/9/,84 and Clerk to the Board F +lh
S. L
r �� ; By :,j ,,,t V/'A:'4Q ( �C4LL"7✓ o
t ,� Deputy Coun Clerk
t
1 ,
'Ps ermit is issued pursuant to Weld County Ordinance No . 108 iron
by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners vat,„,
on ay ,;. 9, 1982 , and requiring the issuance of permits for 2a°oo
the1plq rout and cultivation of grassland. Pursuant to Ordi- $zzlz
nance No. 108 , the landowner is required to follow a conserva- roil d
Lion plan approved by the local Conservation District Board. ipga6W
The landowner is advised to contact the local Soil Conserva-
ti.on District Board for any amendments or updates to the »“»
W LL1 :)m
Conservation Plan . to , roo
rc a 0
ow O
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 1/031 isr
h MO
wzw -
F 0900 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO h«Da
D a>
rgsr
(A/ ',k 84049S �d �_ /y/GfL
Township 7 N , Range.____6 D. (_,) ______, County C1_/�/, ,State C 'io i-Q ek/.n ,
ORDINANCE NO. 108
PERMIT NO. 84-19
-1--- I t r I
. i 1 I i I I I
I i I I ;
, 1 I 1 l-
I I
i ._...-j 1—» — i
--_-fi_ , 1III I I
i
I
I
' 1
i
t I
i 1 I ' i i
i i i I 1a__ i
10-----1---�_ 17 ..--__.��_I�..._— 16_ I N
1 I
I i 1
I 1 i — --` —1 -- - -
----+— --e— _ �— .... I
i i I !
s I
i i {
i i {
I i I
.•y-----•-- 1 i i i i i f {
1 11 20 ! I at ^--i--a=-₹-- i u ! -4---24
u I
I L i
i i
•
I
I
i I I f
1
_ 1--- 1 — -t..._.... _ _...._
i I ! is
i 3° i
a, —za I
I I
I ' I
! I -- _
s _..... — — .._........._..._.._.._. .._ .... _....•___
I 1
•
I i i 4 i is I as •
al IITT------- ----- i_i _
i iI Ii
I �
FORM 50F
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 2/031
F 0901 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
04
West Greeley Soil Conservation District
P.O. Box 36 - Greeley, Colorado 80632
RESOURCE OR LAND USE PLAN REVIEW
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
Name: Lillian C. Allmer Name: SAME
Address: 51294 WCR 76 Address:
Briggsdale, CO 80611
DATE Oh' REVIEW:
ACREAGE BY LAND USE IN CONSERVATION PLAN:
333 ac. to be converted to Non-Irrigated Cropland
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CULTIVATED: (Map delineating the proposed land use
change attached)
333 ac. in the WW of Section 36-T7N-R6OW
PLAN DISPOSITION:
at- dc/r---a."" , a-e-",Gc%aA/Szt.
e y iK
COMMENTS:
/'s4rcl�r9
_//.7d o /
.6p�0R4Ov /
0v: 49/37R 1 tA: WEST GREELEY SOIL
CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD
4. Aa.,• wNo\ By: y(tG�t��. Alload^e`
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0. 00 3/031
F 0902 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
CorrSERvm ION - DEVLLOPMENT SELF INOVERNMENf lNev. 4/83)
CONSERVATION PLAN NAP
Owner A.//. `>n C. f�//m a r- Operator S-YriE
µ I County i-2-/n/ State C o/o r a air) Date .r/i 9fr'44
Approximate acres 33 0 c . Approximate scale 67. " = / me/c.
Cooperating with /--l�-le......S �r.....4./a y Conservation District
N Plan identification SC' 'is r. #a000 Photo number as-7'S AA0d0 "VA?-/7
tAssisted by ..i.e,'n0/� AO /77'//`"` USDA Soil Conservation Service
ek
u'i - 333Ac- /N / . et / \ ,7,QN6ELANO
® h
/i/O#-_Ze t'1 GAT Eb. N/ y/
6RDPLAMD N. //�
/ / \
/ / ( ///1.1. S PLA)fir � ./7//; 4'
.4-
/ ///)
•
,/ //// / e y ,\ i....,0 _ ,,3
/ // 1 Pt rat
F.C..
// / 1.-
' 4
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 4/031
'� F 0903 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
z
isISTED BY Ronald D. Miller, DC DATE 5/1/84
Cooperator: Lillian C. Allmer
&% Sec. 36, T7N, R60W
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SCS-CPA-68
1 -82
RECORD OF COOPERATOR'S DECISIONS
AND PROGRESS IN APPLICATION
PLANNED APPLIED
FIELD LAND USE AND TREATMENT
NO. AMOUNT YEAR MONTH
AND
YEAR
CONSERVATION TREATMENT #1
NON-IRRIGATED CROPLAND
FIELD 20, 333 ac.
20 333 ac. 1984 CONSERVATION CROPPING SYSTEM: winter wheat-fallow
rotation will be established. First year strip-
cropping will be established with german golden
millet alternating with spring barley.
20 333 ac. 1985 CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM: All tillage operations
will be performed with subsurface tillage implements
such as chisels, sweeps with treader. Tillage
operations will be limited to 3-4 per year. Crop
residues will be maintained on or near soil sur-
face so that a minimum of 950# residue will be
left on soil surface after planting. (See SCS-CON-7
form.)
20 333 ac. 1984 WIND STRIPCROPPING: Striperopping will be estab-
lished with northeast/southwest strips of 408 ft.
wide or narrower. Strips are to be in multiples
of seeding equipment except for 40 ac. in northeast
corner of field which will be stripped at 308 ft.
widths.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 6/031
F 0905 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
Cooperator: Lillian C. Allmer 1SISTED BY Ronald D. Miller, DC DATE 5/1/84
et./7. Sec. 36, T7N, R60W
-42 SCS-CONS-15 SCC. ` l T 74/ / G O cc) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
OCTOBER 1974 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
45 SOIL MAP
Owner 2 7'//,Q , C. ,Q//m e-r Operator__ Mt)'£
County L,-e/� State �o%. �,./r Soil survey sheet(s) or code nos. N. &Jr/d CAn t' 'r5'oApproximate scale 2. X0 4' / 17i,. 20\
* N Prepared by U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service cooperating
Twith (s/es'4 (-2,ree ,� Conservation District N.
49 )- __.-. --- »- \----.„\
aR
\\IH:
) 4- \ 45
-
44 44 --�
74
44
44
45 74
44\ 45
44 ) 44 45
J,
44
126 25 74 30 44
45 44 29
44
74 45
44
44
-C____\\ 45
J 40 r\� 74
� - ..
44 55 44 44
]4
45
V5\:\
1M 95 5 44
� tiG 44
44 36 a 31 2
44
44 \ 44
44
i
57
/ as
44 / 4:
44
\ 45
a Ja
4 — 44 74 44 . • i4 \\ 44
55 4 44
44 y4
45
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0 . 00 5/031
F 0904 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
CO-CPA-1
4/82
(180-12-11)
CAPABILITY GROUPS OF SOILS
Capability classification is the grouping of soils to show, in a general way,
their suitability for most kinds of farming. It is a practical classification
based on limitations of the soils , the rink of damage when they are used, and
the way they respond to treatment. The soils are classified according to
degree and kind of permanent limitation, but without consideration of major
and generally expensive landforming that would change the slope , depth, or
other characteristics of the soils ; and without consideration of possible but
unlikely major reclamation projects.
Roman numerals are used to show the 0 broad Capability Classes and letters
follow the class numeral to indicate the principal problem or hazard. Classes
and sub-classes used are as follows :
Class I - Few or no limitations that restrict choice of crops or require
conservation measures.
Class II •- ;Some limitations that reduce the choice of crops or require
moderate conservation measures.
Class III - Severe limitations that reduce choice of crops or require
special conservation practices or both.
Class IV - Very severe limitations that restrict the choice of crops , require
very careful management , or both.
Class V - Not suited for cultivation but has few or no hazards when used for
pasture, range, woodland or wildlife.
Class VI - Not suited for cultivation. Severe limitations . Suited for range ,
pasture , woodland or wildlife with careful management and needed conservation
practices.
Clans VII - Not suited for cultivation. Very severe limitations . Suited for
range, woodland or wildlife uses if carefully managed. Usually cannot apply
physical practices such as pitting, furrowing , seeding, etc.
Class VIII - Not suited for cultivation, range, pasture or woodland. Suited
only for recreation, wildlife, eater supply or esthetic purposes .
e - Erosion by wind or water is the major problem.
w - Excessive water such as wetness , overflow, or high water table.
s - Major problem is in the soil . It nay be too shallow, too heavy, stony ,
low in fertility , salty, alkaline or have low moisture capacity.
c - Climate is the major hazard. Crowing season may be very short, there is
a shortage of rainfall or both.
Examples
Tile - Class III lend where erosion is the major hazard.
IVs - Class IV land where the climate is the major problem.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 8/031
F 0907 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
CO-CPA-1 U. S . Dept. of Agriculture
4/82 Soil Conservation Service
(180-12-11)
C(NSERVATICK PLAN MAP AND
SOIL AND CAPABILITY KAP T,F7',UND SHEET
Different kinds of soi.1, range sites, or woodland sites are separated on the
map by solid black lines. Within each area is an identifying symbol or
name. The following symbols are shown on your map:
Symbol or Site Name Generalized Descriptions
(Detailed descriptions are available it
your Soil Conservation Service office.)
Please Note:
SOIL DESCRIPTIONS CAN BE FOUND IN YOUR COPY
OF "Soil Survey of Weld Co. , Colorado -
Northern Part".
B 1030 AEC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0. 00 7/031
F 0906 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado All Field Offices
March 1983
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
STRIPCROPPING, WIND (Code 589)
B. Strips will run approxi-
Standard mately perpendicular to
the prevailing wind
Definition direction.
Growing wind-resisting crops in C. Maximum Strip Widths
strips alternating with row crops (narrower strips provide
or fallow and arranged at angles better protection and
to offset adverse wind effects. require less protective
cover) .
Purpose
1 . 0-2% slope, 660 feet
To reduce wind velocity at the widths (40 rods) .
soil surface, thereby reducing
soil blowing and damage to crops. 2. 2-5% slope, 330 feet
To trap snow and increase stored widths (20 rods) .
soil moisture.
3. 5% or greater slope , 165
Where applicable feet widths ( 10 rods) .
On cropland subject to soil D. Wheat stubble in the
blowing and where needed as part protective strips will be
of a cropping system for snow left standing through the
catchment and moisture critical erosion period.
conservation. (Nov. through May).
Specifications E. A minimum of 500# of
residue will be left on
Follow guidance set forth in the soil surface after
"Guide for Wind Erosion Control planting for soils in
on Cropland in Great Plains WEG' s 1 , 2 , 3 & 4. If the
States" (Revised 1976) , or Guide for Wind Erosion
Agronomy Technical Note 1153, to Control or Technical Note
calculate widths of wind strips. #53 indicate larger
amounts are needed, then
I. Wheat-Fallow Systems those amounts should be
left on the surface after
A. Strips of wheat will he planting.
planted alternately with
the stubble from the
previous crop; in
approximately equal
widths to facilitate
rotation.
TGN #200
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 9/031
F 0908 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
Striperopping, Wind SEL 2
3/83 TGN #200
-2-
II. Annual Row Crop Systems
A. Strips of high residue producing crops will is • grown in alternate
strips with erosion susceptible crops. Strips will he approximately
perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction.
B. Width and spacing of protective strips:
1 . Row Crop Plants — Minimum width of protective strips will be the
equivalent width of 4 rows spaced 40 inches apart . Spacing
between strips will not exceed 30 feet .
2. Drilled Plants — Minimum width of protective strips will be two
rows (12" — 20" spacing) and the spacing between strips will not
exceed 30 feet .
C. The protective crop will be harvested with a combine or mowed leaving
the stubble 12 to 18 inches tall . The protective residue will be
left on the soil surface through the critical wind erosion seaso❑
(Nov—May) or until the seedbed is prepared for the following crop
which is expected to occur in early April. Spring seedbed
preparation should result in a ridged surface for wind erosion
protection.
III. Perennial Tall Grass Barriers
A. Only tall growing species such as tall wheatgrass , switchgrass , big
bluestem, sand bluestem, Basin vildrye and Indi angrass will be
planted . Range site descriptions and Critical Area Planting
specifications will be used to determine specie adaptation.
B . Seedbed preparation will consist of only those operations necessary
to assure a firm soil condition relatively free of weeds. Planting
in residue from a previous crop is acceptable.
C. Colorado Agronomy Note No. 61 will be used to determine amounts of
seed to plant .
D . Barriers shall consist of at least two rows of grass spaced .10-40
inches apart as a minimum.
E . Optimum barrier spacing will be determined using the Guide for Wind
Erosion Control and will be designed as close to this optimum as
possible considering equipment widths .
E. Weed control will be practiced as needed to control competition until
grass is well established.
G. Barriers will be periodically mowed or clipped to a minimum height of
8-10 inches to encourage regrowth and prevent decadent stands from
developing.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 10/031
F 0909 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Technical Guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado All Field Offices
February 1982
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION
CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEM (Acre) 329
Standard
Definition
A form of noniversion tillage that 1 . Zero tillage, slot planting or
retains protective amounts of residue no-till.
mulch on the surface throughout the
year. These include no-tillage, strip This is a method planting into
tillage, minimum tillage and other prior crop residue by disturb-
types of noninversion tillage. ing only the immediate area of
the row. Crop residue is left
Purpose on the surface for erosion
control.
To protect the soil from erosion and
help maintain or develop good soil 2. Strip tillage.
tilth, and desirable water infiltra-
tion rates and water storage. Tillage operations for seedbed
preparation are limited to a
Conditions where practice applies strip not to exceed one-third
of the distance between rows .
On cropland and on certain other A protective cover of crop
lands where annual vegetation is residue remains on the
grown. balance. Tillage and planting
are accomplished in the same
Planning considerations operation.
Conservation tillage provides a pro- 3. Minimum Tillage
duction system that leaves crop resi-
dues on the surface after planting. Limiting the number of tillage
Crop residues are left standing as operations to those essential
long as possible prior to the succeed- to control weeds , improve soil
ing crop to trap blowing snow. Flerbi- aeration, permeability and
cides are used immediately following tilth. Sweeps, rod weeders or
harvest, prior to and during planting, straight shank chisel imple-
to control volunteer grain and other ments will be used.
vegetation.
Specifications
This practice is most effective when
carried out in conjunction with other A. The primary objective is to
practices such as strip cropping, accomplish weed control with
terracing and contour farming. no tillage or with a limited
number of conservation tillage
One of the following conservation operations, so that adequate
tillage systems should be used : amounts of crop residue can be
maintained for protection from
erosion.
TGN 11182 2/82
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 11/031
F 0910 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
329-2-Conservation Tillage System
B. The minimum amount of crop residue left on the soil surface after
planting shall be 1 ,500 pounds per acre of corn or sorghum residue, or
500 pounds per acre of flat small grain residue or its equivalent .
C. Soil loss by water and wind shall be reduced to the loss tolerance
established for that soil . The Universal Soil Loss Equation and the
Wind Erosion formula can be used to arrive at the amount of residue
necessary to keep the soil loss within limits.
Table 1 - A Guide for Estimating Residue Reduction from Tillage Operations
Approximate Percent of
Residue Reduction After
One Trip or Pass Over
Tillage Operation the Field
Rod Weeder 10
Sweeps (30" or more) 10
Rod Weeder and Semichisel 15
Field Cultivator - (16-18 inch sweeps) 25
Till Planter 20
Chisel Plow (straight shanks) 20
Chisel Plow ( twisted shank) 50
One-Way or Tandem Disc 50
Moldboard Plow 75-100 - ,
D. On systems where tillage operations are permitted:
1 . Subsurface tillage equipment should be used to keep the residue on
the soil surface.
2 . On soils that tend to crust , or with some slope to them, a chisel
type implement may need to be used after harvest to increase water
infiltration and reduce soil loss due to runoff.
3. Chemicals may be used to aid in reducing or eliminating tillage
operations. Use manufacturers labels or Colorado Weed Control
Handbook for specific rate recommendations. The following options
are recommended.
a. Fall sweep (4 inches deep) plus Atrazine. Fall sweep
immediately (within two weeks) after wheat harvest to kill
existing vegetation. Atrazine applied immediately following
fall sweep will kill volunteer wheat and weeds until the next
summer. Limit summer tillage operations prior to planting.
b. Apply a combination of non-selective contact or non-residual
herbicides (such as Paraquat or Roundup) plus Atrazine to kill
existing weeds and for long-term weed control. Limit summer
tillage operations.
/c7N
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 12/031 F 0911 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD Co, CO
TGN #182 2/82
Conservation Tillage System 329-3
c. Contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short residual
(45-60 days) may be used for spring application to eliminate
early spring and early summer tillage. Limit summer tillage
operations.
d. 2-40 Butyl Ester plus atrazine or a short residual triazine is
an economical alternative if approximately 90% of the fall weeds
are broadleaf. Limit summer tillage operations.
E. For no-till systems:
1. Conventional tillage operations will not be used to control volun-
teer crop growth or annual fortis and grasses. On soils with a heavy
clay or silty surface that tend to seal, a light crust breaking may
be needed using sweeps or a chisel using straight shanks.
a. Wheat-fallow (chemical only) - Use of chemicals to eliminate
tillage operations. The following is required:
( 1) Contact herbicides , such as Paraquat or Roundup, plus
atrazine or residual and tank mixes such as atrazine-Bladex
and atrazine-Igran shall be applied immediately following
harvest to kill existing weeds and give long-term weed
control.
(2) A short residual herbicide may be used for spring applica-
tion if necessary to control weeds to substitute for
tillage operations normally used .
(3) A slot or no-till planter or grain drill shall be used that
will disturb not more than 25% of the soil surface.
b. Corn, sorghum, and small grains (chemical only) . Use of chemi-
cals to eliminate tillage operations in irrigated cropland or
annual cropping systems. The following is required:
(1) A contact herbicide plus Bladex, Igran or other short
residual (45-60 days) may he used for spring application if
needed to control weeds to eliminate early spring and early
summer tillage.
(2) A slot or no-till planter or adequate grain drill shalt he
used that will disturb not more than 25% of the soil
surface.
(3) Atrazine may be used in a wheat-sorghum-fallow or a wheat-
corn-fallow sequence.
F. Farmers must be made aware of the hazards involved in using residual
herbicides.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0. 00 13/031
F 0912 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
TCN 11182 2/82
•
329-4—Conservation Tillage System
1 . Caution must be exercised in use of atrazine on soils with a pH of
7 .5 or higher.
2 . Caution should be taken when applying long residual herbicides
annually so no overlap or carry—over effect of chemical occurs.
3 . A minimum of 20 gallons of water, preferably 30, will he needed to
get adequate coverage of chemical.
4 . For more uniform application, large volume sprayers with wide stable
boom coverage are preferred over small units with narrow coverage.
The wider swath should result in fewer overlaps or skips. Dust
should be held to a minimum as it deactivates some herbicides .
Nozzle spacing should not be greater than 40 inches for uniform
distribution.
C . Specific chemical recommendations shaLl he in accordance with container
labels and/or Colorado Weed Control Handbook.
Trade names were used in this standard only to make the information more
understandable. This does not imply endorsement of certain products or
criticism of products not named or mentioned.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 14/031
F 0913 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
TUN #182 2/82
. &OIL EROSION FACTOR TA:
ALLMER PLOW PLAN #2
SERIES • SURFACE SLOPE . CAPA2 . OGLE FACTORS WIND ERO. 'SOILS5
NAME TEXTURE RANGE COHE NIR IR K T R C NEB NUMBER
WCN4 ASCALON FINE SADLY LOAM, 0 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
ASCALON FSE 9- 6 22 43 3E . .7 S 60 50 3 000003
RCN44 OLNEY FINE TANSY LOAM , 0 TD 6 PERCENT SLOPES
OLNEY FSL 0- . SS 43 3E .20 5 60 S0 3 000072
S) WCN34 PLATNER LOAM, 0 TO 3 PERC NT SLOPES
PLATNER L 0- S SO JZ :24 5 60 5O 4' rf0212
WCNSS RENOHILL FI: SANDY LOAM, . TO 6 PERCENT SLO?ER
RENOHILL FSL 6 35 4E .2S . 60 50 3 GY0106
2 ) WCN74 VONA SANDY LOAM , 3 TO 9 PERCENT SLOPES
VONA 52 . 2- 9 . 55 5E .20 S 60 5O 2 CO0O52
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 15/O31
F 0914 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
. 4/27/84 :C : _JSS TABLE PARE 1
._LMER PLOW PLAN 42_
.__AGE PRACTICES
MAPPING UNIT UP & DOWN CRCS3 SLOPE CONTOUR CROSS SLOPE CONTOUR
SUMMARY HILL . /D. STR ,=ARMING WIT ! STRIPS STRIPS
.n. Y FI. E SANDY
Or -- 1
_t+f44 OLNEY ,.. .:d;= ._�.;iW. 0 TO t7 _ 2�:•t�' SLOPES
K_ .20 R= 60 L ;.tip►' :1# SEt. _
: 5 C . q S- i ,5 I.
F) SOIL LOSS . 7 ... .'f 1. .7 .2
0) £f IFF FROM T A . 3 •- . .:3 - 4.3 / - 4.E — 4. 3
.' , MAX C VALUE 69 6.-4 6 .74 6.74 6.74
A;: SLOPE LENGTH •,i : k - r:s..,; * §.** * 4,
P FACTOR 1 .00 ..:':ti . .»_ 1 . .5 ,—
...:K44 OLNEY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 6 FERCENT SLOPES
K= .20 R= 60 L 500 if 3E —
T= 5 r. .3'1 3= 1 . 5
OIL LOSS .•7 .2 .y
L IFF FROM T .4.3 . ti .,3 =t .rS r.,..S 4,3
. --
MAX C VALUE t .';0 ,. .9� _ .?' :3.99 ,. .
_? } i i A X SLOPE LENGTH i-f ....*4** 3; *�.- ,r* 'f-xL.¢ .:*.}t•t::F
P FACTOR 1 ,00 .27 ."5 .25 .25
t r r , F - S +, LOAN, 6, Pis 2C
..._;:; �'EPf,JF,ILA �• INE :=,�tirr ; c_u;-, ,,s To i �� _._.. . .._DPE S
.28 P= 60 L •- 200 ;E= i
. - 3 C= .23 S
=OIL LOSS 1 . 1 1 . .7 . 5 i .3
_. . 01FC� FROM T 1 , _ . . :2 - 2.5 1 - 2. 7
MAX C VALUE .. $1 . .'T9 L .01 1 .37 r 2.02
MA l SLOPE LENGTH 764 -3i 2 7Cc0 76)1— :r.xsv �t•
i
P FACTOR :. ,00 :O5 .'._iiJ .37 .23
i
I
/...
/
r'
VI'
J �,;:.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0. 00 16/031
F 0915 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
• 4/27/S4 S1OIL. DOSS TABLE PAGE 2
ALLNEP FLOA PLAN A2
TILLAGE PRACTICES
MAPPING UNIT UP & DONN CROSS SLOPE CONTOUR CROSS SLOPE CONTOUR
SUMMARY HILL W/0 STRIPS FARMING WITH STRIPS STRIPS
..CN55 RENOHILL FINE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES
= .28 R= 60 ; = 400 4 SEGO
3 C= .23 3= 2._S
BOIL LOSE 1 .7 1 .4 .S .6 .4
Y .. 0IFF FROM . "- 1 . 3 —. 1 .6 2.2 -- 2.4 — 2 .6
MAX C VALUE .42 .63 1 . 13 0 i .67
MAX LENGTH 29 3 293 8 :12 7 *;i*
11 �. SLOPE I_E�� .t �, 1•.s 5008 ;- u'7 t #:. F
.. 1 .00 .85 L .37 75
...'TES
SOIL %OBS IN TONS/ACRE FOR EACH P %)ALOE,
._ . DIFFERENCE IN EROSION RATE FROM T VALUE . A 1 INDICATES THAT EROSION
EXCEEDS T; A INDICATES THAT EROSION IS LESS THAN T.
THE MAXIMUM C VALUE THAT '°i0LILD KEEP SOIL LOSS UNDER T. FO THE GIVEN SLOPE.
THE \J I T THAT
O D KEE?
SOIL
LOSS
E R -" T
... . MAXIMUM IUAi SLOPE LENGTH H T,-r WL•GL�. `� _ _Ci ,� UNDER `e, ��I� THE
GIVEN ,C YALUE.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 1701
F 0916 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ACRICULTUFE Technical guide
Soil Conservation Service Section IV
Colorado All Field Dittoes
flinch ]983
STANDA FS AND SPFti.C'7t:A'1'lcltf
CONSESVATT CJD i,-i;;7PON'PE: SYS'L1{N NIcre) 323
Definition Specifications
Growing crops by using a i . Dry Cropland
combination of needed raltaral ant
management measures. C.roppin- R. `. cropping sequel such
systems include rotations that as idinat- rallow, wheat-
contain grasses and 1-gum, :; , es ; :whom--ral lew orother
well as rotations I :. ohich they :v ; '-nn; sail l he Rpplied
desired benefits are c- i—vet
without the use ot. -Tii r..,p i.1ILP
iron wtaJ a,,!
Vurouc rl ;ion.
To improve or memo Tin good n. Cron rest iu s ,:ill be
physical condition of the s<'ii. i managed in critic a way that
protect the soil dorm; peric.i-: roil loss is held to an
when erosion occurs ; help conirn1 acceptable amount.
weed:;, insects , and diseases ; ani
meet the need and desire of c. The Universal Soil-Loss
farmers for an economic return. b,qudtion and Wind Erosion
Formula will be used to
Conditions where practice applirs determine adequacy of the
----- ---------.----_._.__ cropping system.
On' all cropland and on certain
recreation and wildlife aroma . 2. irrigated Cropland
Planning Considerations a. The Soil Condition Rating
------------ ----------
Indices for irrigated Crops ,
An application of nitrogen should Agronomy Technical Note i'52,
he considered in the early stages will be used to determine
of a high residue management the adegsrcy of the cropping
program to replace that tied up in - sequence and soil fertility
the decomposition process. management.
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 18/031
F 0917 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
Soil ETe: n Fa:toe TabiE
Cooperat• : L.2. Alime2
Planer: R. Killer
Date : 05/0I/8}
Series Surface Slope Gapab . USLE Factor i.nd Etosioo
Name Texture Range 2omt E\R IR K T R C WEO I
. WCN44 OLNEY FINE SA25Y SOAA 0 TO 2 JEREENT SLOPES
OLNEY FSL . .. ,E 3= .20 60 7 _ S 86
. WCN74 YONA SANDY LOA , 2 TO 9 RZRCEMT -SLOPES
SOMA SL 2®9 G3 &E .20 5 60 50 3 @6
B 1030 EEC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0 . 00 19/031
F 0918 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
#i%#'rit1E• Wind E:'u i.',n `"oil Loss , L1 .!'1£' Number i **
Cooperator : L.C. A_ ..:ilc`
Planner : R . Miller
Planning unit ; Plowing Plan #2
Date : 0'5/0 /04
•
WCN44
OLNEY FINE SANDY LOAM, ') TO ff u PERCENT SLOPES
fa
ctor ;actof : 5.0L F ti'_' G J.' .
IE.. tim ted Soil Loss : _.. 9 tons/acre/fear
Difference fr'`oi.. T: _. . _ns/ticrelye. , or
*****#•*#•if* *********4 E***** : put 1r_t'v ''"pis.,-##*•? = :•f=. #ii'#•H=#• i:?:•2 **—r.•7E"s **
Soil Acq're Oates Greater Than 0.S4:i:rr: : 25.(_17
The Field is Ridged , With
Ridge Hr ightL 3.0 in:hes
F!..lrt`ow SS- pacing: 14.0 inch=
Climatic Factor : 50.0%
:fie ,Gyti.
i-3 r i 1�? of Deviation of Wind : »� g'C �
Preponderance Yulue : 1 .7
No Wind Barrier Exts .
Field Width : :.00 .0 feet
Ground Cover `o! p3 !e;-• . _ (I :.'.1 :' _ er Ace )
Sfnaii Grain Stubble r•• 'a .
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 1'4: 25 $0. 00 20/031
F 0919 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
*,. .., * Wind Erola_ _.. =11i L25 _ , Cale Number 2 * si**
Cooper c:: —: c . .'.x '.iT:er
Pic{7 i i.t y.rte. R •
P 14tt"sn i'i'i t:'t . . Plowing Plan #
Date: 05/01/S4
WCN44
O!NE'i F7'NF SANDY LOAM, 0 T C 6 PE7tEEN t BLOPES
T factor: :5.0 I Factor: $6. .
Estimated Soil Lo � . 5 . 8 tons/ace/year
Difference from T : i-.'S tuns/acre/year, of
#it•***####***##*•}t•ii•!: 1;;.**4*•`t?a•* r.t: ;+_it 13t:=1 *'.t'3₹•#it•#**vv.u?r•f # • #u•,•f',i#•x?t•+r•i #
er Thai,Soil t-1gg�•��cg�,tcfs. `,re�tt air . .S-mm: 25.0%
The Fiei'J Ridged ,_jed , ;slit:,
Ride Hei htL 3.0 inche
Furrow Spacing s _4.0 inch!,
Climatic Fact'o'r: 70.0
Angle of Deviation of Wii:'J ; .0 degt'e_c
Preponderance :a_ue: .. .E
No Wind Barrier Gtii :J•4:, .
Field Width : 400. fi:,t
Ground Covet- Ot3r11j'aoner: ':. a :Po .;.nd per Acre )
Small Or-•_.._.. St. _: ?pit; i_i}: . . 7'00,0
•
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0. 00 21/031
F 0920 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
***** Wind Erosion Soil Los , Case Number 3 ** H
Cooperator: G. G. Allmer
Planner: R. Miller
• Planning unie : Plowing Plan #2
Date : OJ/O:/S4
WCN44
OLNEY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0 TC 6 PERCENT SLOPES
T Factor: 5.0 I Factor : 86.2
Estimated Soil Los : 4.9 tons/acre/year
Difference From T: -. 1 tons/acre/year, or
—i . i%
r , . :
###+#+###4###++#*a4,i#,m�## =2Ra� =a .a ,e4#,####&4#44 *#*4#####***
Soil Aggregates Greater Than 0 .04mm: 25.07
The Field is Ridged , With
Ridge Height : 3.0 inches
Furrow Spacing_ : 14 .0 inches
Climatic Factor: 70.0%
Angle of Deeiatiea of Kind : .0 degrees
Preponde ano.e value : 1 .2
No Wind Barrier Ex : 2t .
Field Width . 400.0 feet
- -----------------------
Ground Cover Lemponent (22.u• per Acne )
"—'—Small G Grain Gtu ble (Flat ) ; 550.0
•
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 22/031
F 0921 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
**3*** Wind Er,•sion Soil Loss , Case Number 4 *****
Cooperator: L.L.. A111riu•r
Planner: R. Miller
Planning unit : P1ot•)irr,:3 Plan #
Date : 07731/E4
WCN44 DLNEY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO6 PERCENT SLOPES
T :`actor : O.t.) I Factor : 86. 0
'
Estimated Soil Loss : 7 ,0 tons/ware/year
Difference frci T: +2.0 .yetis/aQre/feat', 01,
:x##***#*#.y.*##3c.u..c:3'a•4i.* * : ;;..i1.1 31• 1?•;p:>' t Data *. . #Y•*#* #i?• *#*******•1,.i4..);.4;#**
Soil A 2 .
_ty'��e�at � Greater Than +"'.c^=►snit,°. );;.
The Field is Sit;Uot ' .
Climatic Factor: 70.:11
1e5'ree s;
=�Yi S 1�.� of Deviation of l•M i �:i : - .0
Preponderance Value : 1
No Wind Barrier Exists .
Field Width : 400.0 ;= et
rout-td Cover CDmpnen li u'_t)"t pe'1' Acre )
Small :.iratlr: Stueble aC .' 1
20.0
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0 . 00 23/031
F 0922 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
**** .ied Erosion Soil L- . _ , Case Num[er S *****
Cooperates: L.C . Alimer
Planner: R. Miller
Planning unit : Plowing Plan #2
Date : 05/01/S4
WCN74
V0NA SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 9 PERCENT SLOPES
T factor: 5.0 I Factor: 86,0
Estimated Soil Loss : _ .S tons/acre/yeah
Difference From T: + .5 Logs/Gore/year, or
+10.7%
**************** ********* Seput Data # if###>**f###+## ### #####
Soil : t=» Greater Than 0 .24mm:
Aggte�5,
The Field is Ridged , With
Ridge Height : 3.0 iaces
Furrow Spacing: 14.0 inches
Climatic Factor:
70.02
Angle of Deviation of Wind: .0 6ejrees
Preponderance Quite : 1 .2
No Wind Sarrier Exit .
Field Width : 300.0 Feet
Ground Cover Components (Pounds per Acre )
Small Grain Stub le e {Flat ) : 750.0
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14 : 25 $0 . 00 24/031
F 0923 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
***** Wind Erosion Soil Loss , Case Number 6 ####_
Cooperates: L.E. Allmer
Planner: R. Mlien
Planning unit . Plowing F1in #2
Date : O /O:/e4
GCR74
)ONA SANDY LOAM , 3 TO 9 PERCENT SLOPES
T factor: 5.0 I Factor: 86.0
Estimated Soil EQ,s ; 3.3 tows/acre/year
Dif{erenoe from T. —1 .7 tons/acre/year, • r
—34 .3%
+#+»####f#+#####»4##*#4#+#k input Dana
» ###*»##*k##+##+#i#4#»##4#
Soil A§gregates Greater Than O .G4mm;
25.0%
The Field is Smooth .
Climatic Factor: 70.0%
Angle of Devillen of Wind : .O aegfees
Preponderance (clue : 1 .2
No Wind Barrier Exits .
/\f\\—\\/\\- . _---_._._—_ .—___—._---.._—_— 300 .0 feet
Ground Cover Components (Round= per Acre )
Small Crain Stubble (Flat ) i4OO.O
•
B 1030 REC 01966798 05/14/84 14: 25 $0. 00 25/031
F 0924 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK & RECORDER WELD CO, CO
Hello