The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About830582.tiff RESOLUTION RE: DENIAL OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN ULTRALIGHT AIRPORT - ERNEST KITELEY, KITELEY FARMS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 6th day of April, 1983 , at the hour of 2 : 00 o'clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Ernest Kiteley, Kiteley Farms, 13844 Weld County Road 7 , Longmont, Colorado 80501 , for a Use by Special Review for an ultralight airport, on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the E'SW4, Section 21 , T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, Section 24 . 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant, all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter, and the recommendation of the Weld County Planning Commission for denial, and was fully informed, and WHEREAS, the Board desires to accept the recommendation for denial from the Weld County Planning Commission for the following reason: 1 . The uses which would be permitted will not be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. Existing uses are agricultural and this area is too congested to accom- modate an ultralight airport operation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the application of a Use by Special Review for an ultralight airport by Ernest Kiteley, Kiteley Farms, on the above described parcel of land, be, and hereby is, denied. 830582 PLoL9n Page 2 RE: DENIAL OF USR - KITELEY The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 6th day of April, A.D. , 1983 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to the Board Chuck Carlson, Chairman B Cl Deputy County lerk J nT. Mar in, Pro-Tem / 4.4.E APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Brant er ounty AtL rney Norman Carlson Ucque i ne (�o nson DAY FILE : April 11 , 1983 A public hearing was conducted on April 6 , 1983 at 2:00 P. M. , with the following present: Chuck Carlson Chairman John Martin Pro Tem Gene Brantner Commissioner Norman Carlson Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson Commissioner Also present: Acting Clerk to the Pnard, Jeannette Sears Assistant County Attorney, R. Russell Anson Planning Department Representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated March 21, 1983, duly published March 24, 1983, in the La Salle Leader, a public hearing was held on the request of Ernest Kiteley for a Use by Special Review for an ultralight aiiport. The Planning staff recommended that the request be approved. The Planning Commission recommended that the request be denied. J. Scott Hamilton, legal counsel for Mr. Kiteley, reviewed their request. He stated that this private airstrip has been in existence since 1965 and they are requesting an expansion to allow for ultralights to use this site. Mr. Hamilton stated that the applicant, Mr. Kiteley, is in agreement with the twenty-one standards as recommended by the Planning staff. Mr. Kiteley has redesigned the traffic pattern for the ultralight aircraft. The new pattern means that all the ulterlight aircraft will take off and land on the Kiteley property. Mr. Hamilton stated that ultralight aircraft fly ten to twelve thousand feet and they can carry no more than five gallons • of gasoline per trip. Therefore, the maximauu distance fran the airport should not exceed thirty miles. Mr. Hamilton stated that Mr. Kiteley does want to be a good neighbor and will do whatever necessary to keep the ultralights within the standards as recommended by the Planning staff. George Hunter, representing the Federal Aviation Administration, stated that his experience with ultralight aircraft to date has been very good and safety has not been a problem. Mr. Hamilton stated that the expansion requested is for the ultralights only not for regular aircraft. He added that their plan is to have an ultralight dealership on the property, an ultralight school and there will probably be twenty employees on the site. Mr. Hamilton stated that the application will meet with all the standards and it would be more attractive to have hangars at the site so the ultralights do not have to be disassembled each time they are moved. Jim Anderson, president of Feathaire, informed the Board of the requirements that must be met before a person can be issued a certificate from an ultralight school. It was determined that a person flying an ultralight craft is not required to be schuoled and does not need a certificate to fly this type of craft. Mr. Anderson stated that an ultralight costs approximately $5,000 and they have a two cylinder engine. He commented on the noise made by the ultralight and stated that it is 65 decibels at 500 feet in any distance. He stated that the recent manufactured ultralights are quieter than the models manufactured years ago. He stating that the ultralight cruising speed is from 35 to 40 miles per hour. Charles D. Saxton, legal counsel representing Dr. R. J. Brisbin and several adjacent landowners, contended that it will be impossible to enforce the operational standards even if they are adopted. Mr. Saxton commented on his problems with mixing regular aircraft with ultralights. He referred to the Federal Aviation Association rule #103 and listed several incidents which confirmed that regular planes and ultralights do not mix. He contented that if the ultralights can fly for 30 to 45 miles per flight they will not always be over the Kiteley property. Mr. Saxton used a map to illustrate the area and stated that 90% of the neighbors have signed a petition in opposition to this request. Mr. Saxton presented letters fran realtors who stated the the surrounding property will be devaluated if this request is approved. A letter was presented, which was signed by the Weld County Assessor, that stated that airports do not devalue surrounding properties. Mr. Hamilton stated this request is a solution for the County not a problem. The Chairman stated that Weld County does not allow any decibels above 55 during the day time and 50 at night. James Anderson said he stated the decibels in- correctly earlier and the decibels are less. Dr. Brisbin stated that he is a neighbor and he raises registered cattle. He totally opposed this request because of the noise. He is fearful that his cattle will be distrubed by the noise. Art Adler, a neighbor, commented on the use of, this aiq.ort over the years and contended that this use will not be compatible with the area. Tape change #83-23 Dean Olander, a neighbor, stated that today we are just talking about 100 ultralights and at the Planning Commission hearing the request was for 50 regular aircraft and 50 ultralights. He opposed the request. Commissioner N. Carlson said that he feels that there is a need for the ultralights but not in this location if the request was east of 1-25 rather than west of 1-25 he would have a different feeling. Commissioner N. Carlson roved to approve the Planning Commissions recommendation for denial. Commissioner Martin seconded the notion. Commissioner Johnson expressed her appreciation to both sides but agreed that she would have to support the motion for denial. Her concerns were regarding the enforcement area and the impact on the area. She was also con- cerned about the mixed use of both ultralights and fixed wing aircraft because both uses are permitted. Commissioner Brantner stated that he was pleased with the rules established by the Kiteley's, however, he does not believe that there is any way to control the ultralights. To him ultralights are a new industry and he believes there should be a universal licensing. Commissioner N. Carlson stated that this is a growth area and he cannot support the request because it is just too close to population. Commissioner Martin stated that he likes to see people have fun but this request has too many minuses and not enough pluses. The Chairman commented on livestock production and the effect noise has on livestock production. He contended that there are several places in the County where an airport of this type could be located but not here. The motion carried unanimously. Chairman - Board of County Commissioners AFJi.ST: �L t1dwv i �.:; d WELD COUNTY rrFRK AND RECORDER AND LERK TO THE BOARD/.--- / BY: -- D uty County Docket #83-16 Tape #83-22 & 83-23 LHR 2164 ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY ' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS : (,9/�' I '/ / /oL c •T 6z 1A .._ — /1 = - -w -'L 'l / PLEASE write or print legibly you)--(t name , address and the DOC 4 (as listed above) or the applicants name or the hearing you are attending. NAME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING MARGARET PAU N 5`I'f1u _FiR Ave E21,--, Cb �t ur _A 4' C/ -- a.c2 rear a.,e/_�.srte4 and CPZJln f I P/ ao ,t`-. ,del H0 7 7 ££s" , �y�h i' A.-;11AkJA A rQ I .e Qu " 9/97, ,,--„z 4 U,tironlT ji�r,c,5-0-k,/ 4// 3.5cal 1}nw.:iTtrin) F1nvvir1+erwtL4l(11Pc. / 3333 ¢eioec 5+. *3150, OA444,44€ 80257 (t+411 -1-Alymes r/ E, 4u ,je2,frri ,,ar. //1.1-41 ('w.,_ 7r Jr #rip ,4) 4hrr, l cforai ',d 4 g nePf- Wihity /3a4,4 nit,R7 Lwtin-,n {' 83`14, /�i '/P47- w / a,.. « }C .to 'S�e t` 131 ti LF \A1 C R. 7 L._o, 1,y.,,.ti.1- K. CA-(eit-c P . 9x Del 1O 5,k Ike Lane o- fr �./G0 opposed i2• k.Ai �2a S/ , N v��7�qJ� �444 au-,/�/ '�r a �_I4L zit _ e v K,G t• ,- 8-S--1 C, eased / Th.0.h 1 . 0/AhkeW ) 3 91 NQJd01e76 * C rob h70h� "ii-jL Of/n5Cd /;r�Jbv >� m� Cz. 4{ /s y 7 C6 10 .e id efy R 0 ad' c 10 zn,k-r k";.-j4 fr, e 1"iNV^(\A rbnks-M-rit a t-\ � ..1 f n i n 4478 crnr-�n A- 't?-)- 1 10 necescci YwereYVIac0o- lerJi Sox,zz7 Cm� X3 ✓� oo,as aL io 9.cr&- s_r$ /Jvc. t /Ebc /hc r�;Ez P44 0 s1v��nrt C?� tjoc1O i�rez7 /00, e�?r1.,F/f r ^1 !fri, :ScA720 S. 3/eel-died/fa, 7 /l! / ; r7/ NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center., 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Use By Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO. 83-16 APPLICANT Ernest Kiteley Kiteley Farms 13844 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: April 6 , 1983 TIME: 2 : 00 P.M. REQUEST: Use By Special Review - an ultralight airport LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the E'SW4, Section 21, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Bette M. Foose, Deputy DATED: March 21, 1983 PUBLISHED: March 24, 1983 in the La Salle Leader DATE: Marc'" 21, 1983 rO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado ROM: Clerk to the Board Office commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 6th day. of April, 1983 at 2 :00 P.M. Docket No. 83-16 - Ernest Kiteley, Kiteley Farms, USR, an ultralight airport OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD BY; , ,-)ere, ,w�C� .4_e Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO de-tP f NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center., 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Use By Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO. 83-16 APPLICANT Ernest Kiteley Kiteley Farms 13844 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, Colorado 80501 DATE: April 6 , 1983 TIME: 2 : 00 P.M. REQUEST: Use By Special Review - an ultralight airport LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the E2SWa, Section 21, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Bette M. Foose, Deputy DATED: March 21, 1983 PUBLISHED: March 24, 1983 in the La Salle Leader �v .,rti LEGAL NOTICE. . Affidavit of Publication HOIMilOw Purwant to tlN nub law,a •� STATE CF COLORADO. �.lite . ss. Stale et Calereds et the Weld Coon' 1 Weld. 1 County Zoning DrIRYigCa,a Public hearing will M IyM NIa Cha - aid Ilene of Me Mani29 P. ` -f.rj� at missiaMrs y ry /(/ Cale- rata,Weld gUNMWVnrtlil Coss said County of Webs being duly-s or say that .- .70,701;31i 1NN Street- ,Cele- am blisher reda. at 1M dine MIper 'LEI the se by -Review are I J - Q/O i / red to And may he the the same is a weekly new caper of genera. circulation rune r.and ublishd in the NE 4T A SO KNOIyztmt the tent town of ant sa cMiN the d{ley 1 Weld PlenitMg maY in said county and state; that the nonce cr adver es mined in thir el Me tisemem. of which the annexes .s a true ropy. b:roe el County C the Weld has been puhltshr in said weekly newspaper CwgtY.tries t13 Nth for / -ansen:nve Sired,Mid..Fleae df::1.4,Cila- raM. - weeks- that the notice was published in the DOCKET Ntn% •APPLICANTregular and enure issue at every number et said newspaper during the pentad and time of pubh- _ cation at said notice and in the newspaper ISgN Wa1RfOledy Rea/ T proper and not in a supple.nent thereof: that the LalymeatiOilerebwDt first publication of said notice was contained in DAT d.ratris6- the sue of s id n wspeper bearina date. the T s a:OO P.M. > �W RevIew T 1� day of .� A :9 LEGAL SCR and the last publication t-..ercaf, in the issue of Pert el dM iywsWlm UO0eN St, aid newspaper becrnr.q date the d:f day ct Tile.RMW of Me fl F.M..Weld e..,-)County,CNNade. -' n e..,-)14 b.=-4 c: the said EDARD'O.CODNtr / COMMISSIONERS ( 1/4...!�_ r ,J WELD cotoi Y.t:OLORADO YJ a eic J NT!MART OU$T units-ram waist ' OATH( has been published continuously and =interrupt- Recoott RANDCLERK ed!y during the ported of at least fifty-two con- TDTNlNOARD secuttve weeks next prior to the first Issue thereof WI:Nip M.PMse,Deputy DATED:.March 21,tip containing sand notice or aaven:semen, above `Published hi the Leptis Leader referred to: and that said newspaper was at the Thursday.March 2_°' time of each of the publications of said notice. - - duly qualified for that purpose within the mean- ins;of an act. entitled, "An Ac Concerning Legal Notices. Advertisements and P•ublicanors, and the Fees of Printers and Publishers thereof. and to Repeal all Ac:s and Parts of Acts in Conflict with the Provisions of this Act." approved April 7, 1921. and all amendments thereof, and pernex. long as amended by on at approved, March. 3C. 1923. and approved May I9, 19311. / _/7 elf..._=.J_�[.f,G!r�,.-� =snot Subscribed and sworn to before me this ._.Z2... coy of ........_.4C -lr°-._...___., AO.. l3c/g? My cam:mutton expires __L_7_.-ems__ Notary R.sbaia q ii,-- . t n EL.ai i.._, '..}:.:J! AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL State of Colorado ) SS County of Boulder ) I Roger L. Morris , do solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL is a daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in NOTICE the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, WcdmeuadwwmaoothatMe, and which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder orrnnaooa.I public,*lrini will be held in the~boreal the tidied of County and Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously Commissioners al"Weld County.Colora- do.Weld County Centennial Center.115 and uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months 10th Street.Greeley Colorado:el the time specified.Alt persons in any manner next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice interested in the Use By Special Review �r�e requested to attend and,may be of advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the BE.r`ALSO KNOWN mal the text and United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions maps so CMmted by me Weld Coamy PTInnt ComtpMwlon may be aa,F�ammed of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and Mmeo�rer:CMnro 1W8Rew.a;, CoOhry tchero touted in ma that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing weldor opnt,C rr o a t c"ns.oe 1gth legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws DOCKET NTD.N 16est6iteb; of the State of Colorado; that copies of each number of said KiteI3844 via mr Road? newspaper, in which said notice or advertisement was published, DnT� p do 80501 were transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the subscribers TIME T g COPateybBY$pe¢iMNW ew-,n' of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mode of business ultralrj1�Open,+ .. in this office. Pell of heEWSW1A.Secpon 21.t9N. .. Re8W 41tie 1m N.M.:Weld County. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY S,OLORADO; in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper;pgtcx)c Rokt SrMpRyANNFEMERSTEIN g WELD COUNTY CLERRAND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY Bede M.Fosse.Deputy week)CM>tbexsxwwwlavxobexcIaxveritlx for the period of 1 DATED.March 21,1001 Published in me Wily Tiro PCso.Long- mont Colo.March 90.1903 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated Ma•r•Lh..-2.6...., 19 83 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated .. .... rah 26 + 19 83 Assistant Business Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26 t h day of ...M.a.r.Lh 19 83. My Commission Expires /J Nootary P c FEE $tQ.F.35 ., : ' E y v MY c(,%, ,•,'nry ExPIREs ( t 1 ( a 1^s Prl . ' out Cl l r ,.: r.o-'oI 1.47 li 1-1300-02 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSIMN COUNT55YPett3 .,4145 RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO a"}rcos\ r !AR 171983 PL Date March 15. 1983 Case No. USR # 544:83;6 ri t c"} P ry1 GREMLEY. COLO. APPLICATION OF Ernest Kiteley, Kiteley Farms ADDRESS 13844 Weld County Road 7, Longmont, Colorado 80501 Moved by Jack Holman that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for an TTltr&Light airport located on the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: Part of the E1/2 SW1 , Section 21, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado be recommended (froamkfl) (unfavorably) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: The uses which would be permitted will not be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. Existing uses are agricultural and this area is too congested to accomodate an ultralight airport operation. Motion seconded by Bill Diehl Vote: For Passage Ed Reichert Against Passage wilh„r Wafal Bob Ehrlich Jack Holman Bill Diehl Terry Kiefer The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on March 15. 1983 and recorded in Book No. VTTT of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 16th day of February , 198.3_• Ovac tl, Secretary a 6 OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER DEPARTMENT OF CLERK TO BOARD PHONE 1303) 356-4000 EXT. 223 O P.O. BOX 459 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO March 21, 1983 Ernest Kiteley, Kiteley Farms 13844 Weld County Road 7 Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Docket No. 83-16 Dear Mr. Kiteley: Your Use by Special Review application for an ultralight airport facility has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is described as part of the E'SW', Section 21, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. This includes publishing a Notice of Hearing in the legal newspaper, an expense to be paid by you prior to the hearing date. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by March 31, 1983. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Chuck Carlson, Chairman I wish to have a hearing on this matter brought before the Board of County Commissioners.y I agree e / to pay for the legal advertising expense. L(N Mfr rott SI l�la : rl � Ua 17` i° ?,1 283 : ; Ernest Kiteley BREALEY. cola Date: Mc .h 15, 1983 CASE NUMBER: USR-544:83:7 NAME: Kiteley Farms REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for an Ultralight Airport LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ez SW1, Section 21, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. LOCATION: approximately two (2) miles south of Mead on Colorado State Highway 66 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE'S STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: • 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements - • .- -- of Section 24. 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1.1 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with comprehensive plan policies in that the use does not appear to infringe on the continued agricultural use in the vicinity or County. - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the agricultrual zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. - The activities and improvements proposed will be compatible with existing and future agricultural and rural residential uses in the neighborhood. - The town of Mead Planning Commission reviewed this proposal in a meeting and listed concerns about the proposal. These concerns are addressed in the Development Standards. - No Overlay Districts affect the site. - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare to the neighborhood and County. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation is based upon the following conditions. 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted; 2. The plat for the Use by Special Review Permit be placed of record by the Department of Planning Services staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site. RA:rg OPERATION STANDARDS Kiteley Farms USR-544:83:7 1. The permitted uses on the hereon described parcel shall be an airport operation to accomodate the following uses: - A maximum of one-hundred (100) aircraft; - A building to be used for aircraft maintenance, hangar space, lounge, office, ultralight aircraft dealership and classroom; - Two (2) hangar buildings as shown on the final plat to accomodate the aircraft; - A parking area with fifty (50) spaces, as shown on the final plat. 2. The operation shall comply with the Design Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.5 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The operation shall comply with the Operation Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 4. The applicant and/or owner shall obtain a "permit for access" for this proposal and submit a copy of the permit to the Department of Planning Services prior to commencing with said operation. The expansion of the existing use does warrant review and approval of the existing access road to Colorado State Highway 66 by the Colorado Department of Highways. 5. Prior to commencing with the operation, the applicant and/or owner shall submit a copy of the approved sewage system permit from the Weld County Health Department to the Department of Planning Services. 6. The proposed operation shall meet the noise emission regulations delineated in the Colorado Noise Abatement Act, 25-12-101 et seq. , C.R.S. , 1973, as amended. 7. The Use by Special Review Permit area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust, and the growth of noxious weeds. 8. Prior to commencing with said operation and prior to the issuance of building permits, the owner and/or operator shall submit evidence of review and approval of required fire protection measures from the Longmont Fire Protection District Office to the Department of Planning Services. 9. All aeronautical activities of ultralight aircraft operators associated with the Use by Special Review Area and all flying of ultralight aircraft arriving at or departing from the Use by Special Review Area, shall be conducted in conformity with the current pertinent provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration, Section 103, the Air Safety Foundation Regulations; and Regulations as defined by the airport and the Use by Special Review Standards. Further, no person shall operate an ultralight aircraft to or from the Use by Special Review Area until he/she has received certification from the Air Safety Foundation and, if required, the Federal Aviation Administration. Prior to commencing with this proposal, a copy of the Air Safety Foundation Certification Process shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. Operations Standards Kiteley Farms USR-544:83:7 March 15, 1983 Page 2 10. Arrival, departure, altitude and traffic pattern restrictions shall be observed by all ultralight aircraft in accordance to the submitted traffic pattern map on file with the Department of Planning Services. 11. The ultralight hours of operation shall be sunrise to sunset. 12. An airport employee shall be on duty during hours of operation. The employee shall be responsible for supervising the airport operation including the administration and interpretation of all regulations and standards associated with the Use by Special Review area. 13. Prior to any take-off, each pilot or operator shall notify the employee on duty at the Kiteley Airport office. 14. No person, firm, corporation or association shall operate an ultralight aircraft on the Use by Special Review area without first securing written permission from the airport employee. The airport shall maintain a record of all ultralight operators given permission to use the Use by Special Review area. 15. No person, firm, corporation or association shall operate ultralight aircraft on the Use by Special Review area without legal liability insurance as prescribed below: - The minimum limits of liability insurance shall be: - One-hundred-thousand dollars ($100,000.00) bodily injury; - Three-hundred-thousand dollars ($300,000.00) combined per accident; - One-hundred-thousand dollars ($100,000.00) property damage; A copy of each certificate of liability insurance shall be maintained by the airport. 17. No unusal concentration of ultralight activity, such as "fly-in", competitive event, display or demonstration that exceeds the maximum number of aircraft, shall be allowed in the Use by Special Review area. 18. Each ultralight aircraft operating on the Use by Special Review area shall be inspected and approved by the airport manager or designated association or individual and shall meet the following criteria: - All aircraft must pass a safety inspection as prescribed by the Air Safety Foundation; - All aircraft must be equiped with an approved muffler system; - All aircraft must be equiped with an altimeter; - All pilots must have and use approved safety equipment, i.e. , helmet, eye protection, etc. 19 Any pilot or operator who fails to comply with F.A.R. 103, Air Safety Foundation Regulations and Development Standards associated with the Use by Special Review area shall be refused the privilege of airport facility. Operation Standards Kiteley Farms USR-544:83:7 March 15, 1983 Page 3 20. The Use by Special Review Shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the standards stated above and all applic- able Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the planS and/or standards, as shown or stated above, shall require the approval of an amendment of the permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 21. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated standards may be reason for revocation of the permit by the Board of County Commissioners. RA:rg ADDITIONAL COMMENTS USR-544:83:7 Kiteley Farms The Department of Planning Services staff has received phone calls from surrounding property owners objecting to this request. Harold Handke of the F.A.A. was contacted for discussion in regard to ultralight altitude restrictions. Mr. Handke explained that altitude restrictions are imposed on take-offs and landings when different types of aircraft are using the same airport in order to safely separate the aircrafts. This request is for an airport that could accomodate fixed wing as well as ultralight aircraft. RA:rg CASE SUMMARY SHEET Case Number: USR-544:83:7 Size of Parcel: 23 acres, more or less Request: a Use by Special Review Permit for an Ultralight Airport Staff Member to Contact: Rod Allison z -. Possible Issues Summarized from Application Materials: This case was continued from the March 1, 1983, Planning Commission hearing. The concerns at the last hearing are addressed below. Harold Handke of the FAA presented testimony at the last hearing concern- ing FAA guidelines drafted for other ultralight airports. As of this date the staff has not received any information. Mr. Handke has been contacted and a copy of the policies used for other airports is in the mail. These policies may have to be modified for the subject site. I have received a copy of the policies suggested by the Air Safety Founda- tion. A copy of their policies is included in your packet. A development Standard will address the incorporation of these policies into this proposed operation. The applicant will present a proposed pattern of flight around the airport in order to identify noise sensitive areas. Minimum altitude for flight and flight over congested areas will bs regulated by the FAA. A Development Standard will be recommended addressing ultra- light identification from the air. RA•rg ditallitiar AOPA Air Safety Foundation 7315 Wisconsin Avenue B60 428(1a MD 20814 301'Fix i ,n: FEDERAL AVIATION REGULA"ION PART 103 RELEASED: The long awaited regulation governing ultralignts is out. This important ruling is reprinted in its entirety beginning un the reverse side of this page• We suggest that you read it carefully so that you are fully aware of your privileges and responsi'•rl: cies under the regulation. The lengthy preamble to Part 103 which gives the FAA' s rationale behind all aspects of the regulation is not included bocaure of its length. However, the following excerpt is quoted for esphanis cud background : "While this rule does not, of this time regntle a.i •.tran/aircraft certification er vehicle registration and is Itemised on the absolute minimum regulation nec_:c-c:y to ensure safety in the public interest, a continuation :;c burgeonin€ growth of the ultralight population could necessitate further regulation. The best practices and methods to preclude the need for further Federal regulation appear to ae least inzlude : self-regulation and self-policing, safety standards, membership In organi ations and associations equipped to function and operate programs approved by the FAA, marking:; ad ] identification of vehicles, programs including provisions sirllat to Federal Aviation Regulations relating to aircraft ; both operation ond air- worthiness) , etc. FAA will continue to monitor de, formance of tha ult:falight community in terms of safety ntc:tfstics , grmath trends , and maturity and, if indicated. w3J ` cake add.ittotal regulatory actions to preclude degradat. .or of safety to she general public while allowing maximum _ .:vaou for ultralignt operation. In summary, it shot)d be emphasized that the individual ultralight operator's support and curTfiance with national self-regulation programa is ess^nt:ia]. to the FAA's continued policy of al)r,win,; industry ,r,elt regulation in these areas. " The FAA' s intent in this mattrt. H clear: do it voluntarily or we ' ll do it for you: The Air Safety Foundat: un is th,. first organization to offer the ultralight pilot and owner a complete package of voluntary programs. Write and ask us about them• Foundedin19.50 • Dedicatedexclusiveiytogenerdiaviationsalely PART 103 - ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES Subpart A - General 103.1 Applicability. This part prescribes rules governing the operation of ultralight vehicles in the United States. For the purposes of this part, an ultralight vehicle is a vehicle that : (a) is used or intended to be used for manned operation in the air by a single occupant; (b) is used or intended to be used for recreation or sport pur- poses only; (c) does not have any U.S. or foreign airworthiness certificate; and, (d) if unpowered, weights less than 155 pounds; or (e) if powered : • (1) weighs less than 254 pounds empty weight , excluding floats and safety devices which are intended for deployment in a potentially catastrophic situation; (2) has a fuel capacity not exceeding 5 U.S. gallons; (3) is not capable of more than 55 knots calibrated air- speed at full power in level flight ; and (4) has a power-off stall speed which does not exceed 24 knots calibrated airspeed. 103.3 Inspection requirements. (a) Any person operating an ultralight vehicle under this part shall, upon request, allow the Administrator, or his designee, to inspect the vehicle to determine the applicability of this part. (b) The pilot or operator of an ultralight vehicle must, upon request of the Administrator, furnish satisfactory evidence that the vehicle is subject only to the provisions of this part. 103.5 Waivers. No person may conduct operations that require a deviation from this part except under a written waiver issued by the Administrator. 103.7 Certification and registration. (a) Notwithstanding any other section pertaining to certification of aircraft or their parts or equipment, ultralight vehicles and their component parts and equipment are not required to meet the airworthiness certification standards specified for aircraft or to have certificates of airworthiness. (b) Notwithstanding any other section pertaining to airman certification, operators of ultralight vehicles are not required to meet any aeronautical knowledge, age, or experience requirements to operate those vehicles or to have airman or medical certificates. (c) Notwithstanding any other section pertaining to registration and marking of aircraft, ultralight vehicles are not required to be registered or to bear markings of any type. Subpart B - Operating Rules 103.9 Hazardous operation. (a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that creates a hazard to other persons or property. (b) No person may allow an object to be dropped from an ultralight vehicle if such action creates a hazard to other persons or property. 103.11 Daylight operations. (a) No person may operate an ultralight vehicle except between the hours of sunrise and sunset. (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, ultralight vehicles may be operated during the twilight periods 30 minutes before official sunrise and 30 minutes after official sunset or, in Alaska, during the period of civil twilight as defined in the Air Almanac , if : (1) the vehicle is equipped with an operating anti- collision light visible for at least 3 statute miles; and (2) all operations are conducted in uncontrolled airspace. 103.13 Operation near aircraft; Right-of-way rules. (a) Each person operating an ultralight vehicle shall maintain vigilance so as to see and avoid aircraft and shall yield the right-of-way to all aircraft. (b) No person may operate an ultralight vehicle in a manner that creates a collision hazard with respect to any aircraft. (c) Powered ultralights shall yield the right-of-way to unpowered ultralights. 103.15 Operations over congested areas. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons. 103.17 Operations in certain airspace. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle within an airport traffic area, control zone, terminal control area, or positive control area unless that person has prior authorization from the air traffic control facility having jurisdiction over that airspace. ��ULTRAAL IIG�GHTT PROGRAMS 103.19 Operations in prohibited or restricted areas. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle in prohibited or restricted areas unless that person has permission from the using or controlling agency, as appropriate. 103.21 Visual reference with the surface. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle except by visual reference with the surface. 103.23 Flight visibility and cloud clearance requirements. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle when the flight visibility or distance from clouds is less than that in the following table , as appropriate : Flight Minimum Minimum Altitudes Flight Distance Visibility from Clouds 1,200 feet or less above the surface regardless of MSL altitude : (1) Within controlled 3 statute miles 500 feet below airspace-- 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal (2) Outside controlled 1 statute mile Clear of clouds More than 1,200 feet above the surface but less than 10,000 feet MSL: (1) Within controlled 3 statute miles 500 feet below airspace 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal • (2) Outside controlled 1 stature mile 500 feet below airspace 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal More than 1,200 feet 5 statute miles 1,000 feet below above the surface 1 ,000 feet above and at or above 1 statute mile 10,000 feet MSL: horizontal e'f AOPA Air Safety Foundation 7315 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda.MD 20814 (301)654-0500 August 30 , 1982 SUGGESTED STANDARDS FOR ULTRALIGHT FLIGHTPARKS Background The powered ultralight vehicle (ultralight) movement has grown rapidly since its inception to the point where it has become a significant factor in general aviation. While many ultralight operators have been successfully integrated into conventional airport operations , it is generally agreed that the ideal situation would be for them to have a dedicated flying site of their own. This will allow the ultralight movement to have the maximum oppor- tunity for unrestricted operations which will enhance enjoyment of the sport and accommodate their unique flight training requirements . The term "flightpark" is being used to distinguish these areas from conventional airports . Persons desiring to build flightparks and state aeronautical agencies have expressed an interest in establishing guidelines for these sites . In response to this need, the AOPA Air Safety Foundation, in conjunction with concerned state agencies , and ultralight manufacturers and operators , have formulated the guide- lines listed below. These guidelines are the first look at the subject and may not address all of the applicable issues . There- fore, all interested parties are encouraged to communicate their ideas on the subject to the Air Safety Foundation. The FAA has not yet issued an official policy on the subject. The Air Safety Foundation is maintaining liaison with them on the subject, however. GUIDELINES Definition: A flightpark is an area of land that is used or in- tended to be used for the landing and takeoff of powered ultra- light vehicles . Notification: Each person desiring to establish or deactivate a flightpark shall notify the appropriate state agency and the Federal Aviation Administration. It is recommended that FAA Form 7480-1 be used to notify both agencies . Flightpark Classifications : The following classifications are not meant to be mandatory, rather they are intended to assist both operators and controlling agencies in site selection and usage. Founded in 1950 • Dedicated exclusively to general aviation safety . -,. A. Class I - Unlimited class. Suitable for all training operations and competition. 1. A minimum level surface of 2 ,500 x 500 feet aligned within 40 degrees of the prevailing wind. 2 . Clear approaches to both ends of the primary runway. An obstruction clearance plane of 15 : 1 extending from either end of a minimum included landing surface of 1 ,000 feet long outward for a minimum of 2 ,000 feet and 150 feet wide is recommended for this application. 3. Nearest controlled airport a minimum of five miles away and the nearest uncontrolled airport a minimum of two miles away. 4 . Significant residential areas at least two miles away. 5. Favorable zoning rules . B. Class II - Suitable for most training activities . 1. A minimum level surface of 1,000 x 300 feet aligned within 40 degrees of the prevailing wind. 2. Approach/departure paths should be free of tall obstructions. 3. A minimum of one mile from residential areas. C. Class III - Limited use. Not suitable for training. Intended for private activity only. 1. A minimum surface of 300 x 100 feet aligned within 40 degrees of the prevailing wind. General Design Considerations A. Careful consideration must be given to obstacles of any nature that might cause significant wind-generated mechanical tur- bulence or wind shadow in the landing and takeoff area. B. A fence or other barrier must be used to segregate the aircraft operating area from other areas used for the general public, and aircraft maintenance and administrative purposes. C. A minimum of one wind direction and velocity indicator capable of indicating a wind velocity of a minimum of 5 mph should be installed adjacent to the runway. D. An ultralight operating area symbol (shown below) should be installed at the base of the wind indicator or other appropriate location. Ultrnlight Owning Area Symbol 10 fool Windsock/wind Wean polo dlu.tn Wimm 31i 4 >y4;'.•` BLACK IrdlnO dirncllon and',alums indicators E. That portion of the aircraft operating area protected by the obstruction clearance plane or at least a 200 x 100 foot rectangle designating the center of operating area should be clearly outlined by paint, powdered lime or markers. F. Hazardous areas on the landing surface and significant obstructions on or adjoining the flightpark should be clearly marked. Operations Each flightpark operator should specify traffic patterns for both ground and flight operations . Noise sensitive areas should be detailed and noise abatement procedures specified, if necessary. Accident Reporting Each flightpark operator shall be required to report to the AOPA Air Safety Foundation any reportable aircraft accident which occurs on the flightpark or for an aircraft which originates at the flightpark. (A reportable accident is one in which a death occurs or an individual must be treated at a hospital or other medical facility, or where an aircraft receives substantial damage. ) This report must be made within seven days of the occurrence. CASE SUMMARY SHEET • Case Number: USR 544:83:6 Size of Parcel: 23 acres Request : A Use By Special Review Permit for an ultra light airport Staff Member to Contact: Rod Allison Possible Issues Summarized from Application Materials: The Town of Mead reviewed this proposal and recommends that the use not be allowed on the subject site. Staff has not received a formal letter from the Town of Mead as of this date. In a telephone conversation on Feb. 22, 1983, the following concerns were expressed: (1) aircraft noise, (2) flying over town, (3) possible future expansion, (4) flying over school located a mile northeast of the proposed aircraft runway, (5) other local air strips available for use. The County Health Department recommends that a septic permit be obtained for the proposed building's sewage load and that the proposal meet all county and state noise emission regulations. The State Highway Department recommends that a "Permit For Access" be obtained from their office. The Longmont Fire District has not responded as of this date. c ''" 'i ^ .z_ 'r't,'.' t ky M ^s• }1} "? :^� t `' .✓._f,� 4,,„,,,,,,,.,r" ^ dart .:f.... t "^4.'it8t •x,4�u ..:tY^ita - 3•. 3 s } � �Y •�Ft � C.�. i •r�"1 rt t 4` I rlF 1. £.c $ #.r ,�. • Y_ • ,•,'`s ,x'^' f i«z _,.r r 4 ,.•}fitd ',$�,a` 4 axN- zP "rzSG' r�e >. _ to T� S3 y 4 r n x+•y 'd,b +' -Y' a ) .. ..+ • . a .y q ` ,y y fl _.e4t ¢..4,:t4 Y f -t.X 4 _`h1 } y� '�}. • ,�l 3�y • r t r.yr•' k i{L ih'} k s, vRLSu^f{S .a,. _r * 1 'e� "•" 5+. :: r_- 1 ',rx try,; -� r . t '& . .r 'ad a•cc * • e:; .s " i - ;a,, t� i -_.^ t ,liht I r '4 'tic,Y4 „�*S�.4 W Y a • ..{ PS+' -•h f'CyS•,�f"` Cr; ti . r�i J .w` t i v^ -, 4. ."6'� .C+s'fT' n1y- fj s tl4t'sh 4 : .. ,M i' .wfi�sY' .: k�yb ><.i3 v -, .y A + a �,..�„ ; �/ `" •e ri r.f K" 1 S ' •y' , Y ' �5fp�„�s ,.,Sy.r..�' ,, iY t Yr �y f� .-.nK" .se•6 ..A,....1,,,•. a-I•- 4 + w-x tr".y^<- • rl,.. v'F ^ }x'Jl"Siy ";x%'^•M 5 - 4 if $' .J7 3 r' '. to m ?- • R ' . a. i „y' r�s� ..Z .��' 'X` - t(iM $Yib'�Jypr�y'333`�tE -y�`fr•'{ a � '1G r .- • S .%'+y�} '{ I I,k i ex Jry. - y ... a : - eY r • y. 6 ;r l W •-•4. + r9' T ' x p ' N y�y""A�.gn� app,,��,<, to ggss},, - .,1"' ; Ti'‘ Ai,ij h` \ r i 1.t.".4.1/4‘., fi f- � �"' '{i rapt er' ''1.- ---:-.CL•w a1�frm 44- (a.1 ` -yr t''" 's . r : ; tR gr! lv ! *t - z _* s ."1.-. I ';VI r "L' f fir r•ktt. .ax se:, I•' ..,,,u+wJ• S x 'j6 c :^ 9� �..s t! a. 'K.c N`cr.•" t Y .4. � ,rf '••'x 4�. +5. j£'y« ,y.. h — s i ; r �... T. Att.,�' '^. .Ry' 1 V fT Y {� y • !' J1�te 4 ✓ +i�r T f.P-r�.'._p� r.`, . ':sex.tL �R"`S.r t`,�L{ -75.ey.�'. ��,�, sit tFYm` `I / S• �S.'l t •lit1I �:An lb ... A ' ,t.>r .1 yet` - ;+,V , _ "�' w x. rve. ,11i aloe _4 re{ t y • r� zwkk$7 y 'u r z�,t' ry - . IA— 'IY#.� +.� -' ?. 3«' e 'ems�S ? yy x^ \., t3s 'IFS[sttw�8. ,y y7ay. Y+. :.y �`... �l "ia4 - Lr •y`j1• �� 1 µ �5 e +' ` . 'k'- ,- x ¢. , O \ Y'` '• ,._ x. s t' ,•.S n ±$' Ij[:,` t ,� t . Y Y�IA4- y p'T , 4 7:..'t !• !rv'"``• 't d ti' i,✓,./y�. '-'c c w.'. ° " k 2 Y i �s 1 # ,max ,»„t`*r c iz• it �: /tyy¢¢ .2.,/.."i•: {t '" '�S " a. ' / ,w , tis r� •... ‘ ' yC •�.1 M.., �' ad •1 rte • ' x �.i a.lt - +* {� 44- _- 4 `-� yt ✓ h , 'i1�fq[N vgSzs4 l � t _..c 4 i, '-•r d` •. _ i }.l' ! 'A6 'r EEC. ^�-..' ! w' ,,, .y Y v �j ] n 1 Y T 9 ua:+ } ea} a e ?rt r •y. r - Ate,, • • r�A,_ f rti ,4 1 yip. y ., "ir - ''r I Sv •r<.. Ali. P ' , s' } ?-'ILk v.1! � Fx 4TH u ..- '6• y # xU 3r h, yt h • t .� >xTr .1 a . 4 tied } I T'4:w'4"� +s b } Y Cu�i T •t:' At41 .{I `Ge.. ' a k`�� S ..r'�tF ir ,a.:..-44 tea. -, • e �' •e• t �'yk` !t ,('•} i_^1 4 `"•'ye fi"y.<iS� . f 0.M ^F" „v cl f otAf t . S^ i , ,+'e'+� YY�E `a i t • 'CHI' •/ "''M'- � el •�J S y�...�,. t Y 14 x� 1 i A r7r y / et • 'l7"rtie'.-1TMn `' �ij 45 ,2p � ', •.. yn4,,, _it.. �& ° . /xh'' l! ar- 1 ` Y �'e '.i yr F _ M t 4 .\ .: t T - tl_ 'S4 i� Ias,•pr r .lP'.�i7f*Pr R 4v v t�W� .+k�•r lF •M1 2 ... 4 t .� }.yi 4 �•°� c. �' 5yT p 1 ,�''*�a i t. r .may ' y-+��'r-. �i' xh�4' ' _ y x "� 3 r4 4T rll, t � r" / -�.lt" 'y G�i- F Y rry ! r♦ 9i V Y ^"_a 1'1aY { ° �`r T ��.' } �t �� 1 -�ka : - � "'4 +V > }1$x+K+3 w .� • [a' ��tx4'F-rc - , f�F �' •R S 5 <. J ♦ ` 1'y ca. v ,s+`�rry Kts `i4S� } �'h:,�e r :r. •'g ysk,.ti _ c "+e<�✓ etw 4. -.•� 1'F+t"'.�t �"+ "yr 2.t-�, <.y 1 t x2 '' t hl �* Od YY• W.�. •, i ' °Ef g 4 • I V. . Ill P O O N a P m O N a t__ OD b N a tr. • s to •a : •e • ax N C O U :la N T Y , w I L A R I M ERA COU z z z P !. 1 �� . 1. ( l - - - �. : � • :- �' - y :X n ` - \ • � - • or . ) ✓. , .J ' , • ' ; �. y ' ,.' 'D� '• ` •Sti /'1 • ® i s - •' - • • d "!t-) . . 6. J] • • �i q II' . . • i " = • al• '•. r�•.y^-�I �' f T4/in' , S L'Io , ..1-,- " U• e,ro "r 1• , . -• • •o • ��. ••7- • .• •• ..° • I. • • • • ,. • To • - rj (Gil . •1 „ _i• .., i I U' • 2 ,tg: . ii: . •• i' '• • • " a . o.',d z , . • o _ •. • ..Ni. -, -�•; • • • . .ice 1 _,-,_, � , .�"11\a -mQ i •i•I..w.0,3%i, •g - •QV• •- - •• 1 • ' O ' .- • I'•O^.^ • \N •II • - / ;�: • , a f% I 1 Li• :w • • Yti I . ..\ I IT7: c e :.;t: •1 • - •, •• ".1. ' ._._IV• y • me se . ea • ��-4� i •s]. e• • �!� .:� wa rpwPi -_ � o.•oO" ••36 ••ru • ~�•• 17 '; --Inv: ..lumen/ :1 :-..:2 - 1• r• . I n a 7. • . : - f: . ,-, `lo'� 'fi• t y • la-.nu .- • . um� 0 :It a . • nn�� a - : I a • o•z• . y - .., - I . ��.� __. utir ... -,•d F`u r. —.-. • 1--- -----l4�r-� ust.•-r • LI-•r4•- rrr ;,•{"'yH •.• - YSu. •1••• 4 'lam - • ' /`.1 . I •• r �\ Y. I _/-\--).. .• O I I • - ', . ._ : A APPLICATION USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW Department of Planning Services, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 400 Case Number V c P_ gq ) Date Received -tG Sr (C1�-J Application Checked by / 2 Application Fee /�.o a Receipt Numbe Recording Fee 16.00 Receipt Number 37, D-8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (please print or type, except for necessary signature) I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the pro- posed Special Review Permit of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County Colorado: Part of E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: SW 41 Section 21 T 3 N, R P8W LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Review Permit is proposed: .,—: _Y Section 21 T 3 N, R65 W Property Address (if available) PRESENT ZONEA OVERLAY ZONES he TOTAL ACREAGE 93 PROPOSED LAND USE ri'ivate airport EXISTING LAND USE ^ivate airstrip and arriculture SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Name: Trit.eley Names Address: 13844 Weld Cty Rd 7 City LonLmont . Coln Zip F0501 Home Telephone # 535 4323 Business Telephone # Name: Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # Name Address: City Zip Home Telephone # Business Telephone # APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above) : Name, Ernest M Kiteley Address: 13544 ::°CR 7 City Lonrmont , Colo Zip 80501 Home Telephone # 535 4323 Business Telephone # Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: Kiteley Farms Address: 13844 WCR 7 City Longmont , Colo Zip 8C501 Name: List of lessees attached Address: City Zip Name: Address: City Zip I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) O 1 Signature: Owner or Authorized nt 19 1,111!"5-41--7., "' ' Subsrribed and sworn to before me this � S\ day of - p,,�,.,��.��, g3 . SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires n ,. , . /S 1 9 g'6 SUPPORTING STATEMENTS In compliance with the request for supporting documents set forth in Section 1 of the Procedural Guide for Use By Special Re- view, the applicant makes the following statements : 1. a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in that it does not infringe upon continued agricultural use in the area. It also does not allow uses that could be carried out in an urban setting to expand into a rural area. b. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the district in which the use is located. The district is agricultural, and as such offers not only the resource of crop produc- tion but also that of recreation for county residents . This use would not interfere with the agricultural use since the land to be used is already a private airport and is not in agricultural production. c . The use of this land as an ultralight airport will be compatible with surrounding land uses , ie. , farming and fertilizer production. Flying ultralight aircraft off the existing airport will have no impact upon the continued use of the surrounding land for agricultural purposes . d. The use of the current airport as an ultralight facility will be compatible with the future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zone and also with future development of the county as projucted by the Comprehensive Plan in that no more land is required for the airport than is currently in use for that purpose, and the airport will not detract from the continued agri- cultural use of the surrounding land. e. No overlay districts affect the site of the proposed use . f. The area of the proposed use is in an agricultural district. However, the land under consideration for use is already in use as a private airport; therefore, agricultural land will not be taken out of production. The additional reve- nue generated for the landowner by using the airport for ultralight activities will also help insure that other agricultural land will remain in production. g. There is adequate provision for the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and county. All health, building and fire codes will be com- plied with. There is the further advantage of removing a large portion of projected ultralight aircraft traffic from general aviation airports such as the Weld County Airport, a move that will enhance the safety of all airport users . '1 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATION In compliance with the request for a detailed description of the proposed operation and use, the following details are sup- plied by the applicant: 5 . a. The proposed use is the expansion of a private airport to accomodate an ultralight aircraft operation. There are an estimated 30,000 ultralight aircraft in use in the United States today, and conservative estimates indicate that that number will double in 1983 . The experience of airports , ultralight dealers , and ultralight pilots is that ultralights do not mix well with general aviation traffic . The position of the FAA is that ultralights should fly off separate air- ports dedicated to the use of ultralights . This proposal is for the addition of an ultralight operation to a small private airport. The operation would include a dealership which will provide sales of ultralight aircraft , complete professional services to maintain and repair the craft, a full training program for ultralight pilots and hangar and tie-down facilities for the craft . Ultralights would be flown from the existing dirt strip, and the area adjacent to the strip would be used for taxi and training. Adequate parking space for users would be provided near the buildings . b. The nearest residential structure is that of one of the landowners and is approximately 300 feet from the operations area. There is a trailer at the fertilizer plant approximately 500 feet from the area. The next dwelling is over 1000 feet from the area. c . One shift would be worked since the craft can operate only during daylight hours . The maximum number of employees is projected to be ten. d. The maximum number of craft we anticipate being based on the site is 100. e. There is no "e" on the application form. f. Not applicable. g. One large metal' building to be used as shop, hangar, office, pilot lounge and classroom area is proposed. There will also be a number of smaller metal structures to be used as I t individual aircraft hangars . (The exact number and arrange- ment of these structures is unknown at this time, but we project being able to hangar a maximum of 60 individually owned craft. ) h. The proposed site is located on Highway 66, a paved highway. The traffic to the site will be mainly personal automobiles , and adequate parking will be provided on the site so that highway congestion can be avoided. i. Sewage facilities will include installation of an adequate septic system for the main building and the use of portable sanitation units outside. j . Not applicable. k. Waste and trash will be removed by truck from the site to an acceptable disposal area as often as needed. 1. We propose to begin construction of the main building in April and to continue improvements throughout the year. Extra hangar space will be constructed on an as needed basis . m. The proposed landscaping includes planting of sod or tough native grasses on areas to be used. Fencing will be con- structed to separate the flight operations area from ob- servers . Some decorative plantings will be made around the building and use area. n. Not applicable. o. Fire protection measures will be taken according to the recommendations of the Longmont Fire Protection District office. Denver Airports District Office U.S.Department 10455 East25th Avenue of Transportation AurSabo 203ora,Colorado 80010 Federal Aviation Administration (303) 340-5553 JAN 2 ii ij Ms. Joanne C. Anderson Feathaire Aviation 11654 Community Center Drive, #110 Northglenn, Colorado 80233 Dear Ms. Anderson: Your proposed establishment of a commercial ultralight operation at the Cartwheel Airport near Longmont has been reviewed. If there are no violations of Federal Aviation Regulation Part 103, Ultralight Vehicles, we enthusiastically support this development. If we can be of any further assistance in this matter please call me. Sincerely, Harold N. Handke Environmental Planner X NOISE REPORT The noise report requirement has been waived. Testing by the Eipper Aircraft Company on the most popular ultralight model revealed a decibel level at 500 feet from the noisiest side of the engine of 60 - 65 . The engine and muffling systems have been improved since this testing to make them quieter. There is no objection to noise from the occupants of the two dwellings within 500 feet of the operations area. The next residence is over 1000 feet away, and noise there will be within the residential standards . REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Ernest M. Kitely CASE NUMBER: USR 544:83:6 SENT REFERRALS OUT: February 3, 1983 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY February 21, 1983 en ,n o cn o H H Z ZO' N W 0 6q y t a z O U U 2 O 2 Pi: 6 {enzq h W O U G w O U O V U 0 en W z - z co FL z County Attorney (plat only) Longmont Fire District X Weld County Health Department Capt.1 Emerson X P' 9119 County Line Road X Longmont, CO 80501 Engineering Department X Debra McDaniel County Extension Agent Town Clerk (y(\ Town of Mead Colorado Geological Survey P.O. Box 217 1313 Sherman Street Mead, CO 80542 Room 703 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone - 535-4477 Colorado Water Conservation Board Ed Reichert Centennial Building 19279 Weld County Road 17 1313 Sherman Street Johnstown, CO 80539 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Engineer Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Highway Department XX 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 MAILING LIST USR 544:83:6 Edward and Evelyn Kopitzke Patricia Ackard 14153 Weld County Road 5 c/o Ackard Land Co. Longmont, CO 80501 179 South Monroe Street Denver, CO 80209 Arthur and Charlene air Z),.04.x." ' _ Route 1 James S. Haley Longmont, CO 80501 Trustee of Maxine Haley Trust \J - 340 Crestridge Lane Glen and Katheryn Williams Longmont, CO 80501 Box 227 Longmont, CO 80501 Martha J. Harless Margaret L. Salberg Dean and Dorothy Olander Kathryn L. Hobbs 13799 Weld County Road 5 P.O. Box 457 Longmont, CO 80501 Johnstown, CO 80650 David Heil 13877 Weld County Road 5 Longmont, CO 80501 James and Karen MacDowell Rt. 111 Box 229 Longmont, CO 80501 R. T. and Penny Brisbin 2498 State Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Liberty Hall Grange No. 459, Inc. Harold Leonard, Secretary 11965 Wasatch Road Longmont, CO 80501 Tom Kitely 2343 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Colorado Chemical and Fertilizer Co. 2387 Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80501 Geraldine Highland Rt. 1, Box 254 Longmont, CO 80501 P . Reed Walker Real Estate Investments 2226 Grant St. Longmont, CO 80501 776-4806 April 6 , 1983 Mr. Ernest M. Kiteley 13844 Weld County Rd. 7 Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Kiteley; You requested an opinion regarding the effect of your proposed airport use on nearby real estate values. As you know I have specialized in appraising real estate in Longmont since 1966 and have also been active in promoting the Longmont Airport from 1955 , and presently serve on City of Longmont' s Airport Committee. Over 200 aircraft are based at our airport and activity over the years has been considerable. I have seen no evidence in the market that real estate values have been adversely affected. I include homes along Rogers Road , off the end of runway 11; in Schlegel Subdivision; land and homes on Florida or Nelson Road; homes in a new Subdivision, Solar Valley, which is under the down wind leg for runway 11 ; homes and the Waddle farm to the west off runway 29. The only exception I can think of would be two homes along Hygiene Road right under the climb out area and just off the end of Runway 29. They have not sold nor been offered for sale to my knowledge , so I can only assume that they may be depreciated. If asked to do an appraisal on any property near your proposed strip, I can not conceive of any adverse effect on values . Sinoergly, P. Reed Walker PRW/jw April 6 , 1983 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: My name is William C. Ackard and I reside at 7877 E. Mississippi , Denver , Colorado . Ackard Land Company has been our family business since 1890 . I've been associated with it since shortly after World War II. We were in the cattle business for many years raising purebred Angus cattle. That operation was located near Buckley Airfield. I can tell you that cattle , especially purebreds , are frequently frightened by aircraft and it ' s not uncommon for them to go through barb wire fences causing serious injury and damages . Ackard Land Company is currently in the farm and ranch brokerage business . I can tell you from many years of experience that any kind of aircraft operation in an agricultural area will cause the surrounding farms and ranches to decrease markedly in value. Also , from my own personal experience I know that things have a way of starting small and getting bigger and out of control . My wife owns property northwest of the proposed ultralight airport . The property is farmed by Art Adler and is managed by Ackard Land Company. We do not want that facility located there . Sincerely, /17 1 WILLIAM C. AKARD \ � \ ~ \ ` h II ! . h ull I ▪ ` � � ] ) ( / \ /J) , . .b` ~ DIO ) Hi re CD it w \ l• 81 p46I al ) ww \g3 \ % ) \ / }) j \ tH. -P \ ] % ] {\ /) / ] P HI! 1 cn ii \ 0t I LH ) & /§ \ \ >1 ! ] ) H ~\ \ r 4 ) \ e \ ; tt ) / ) § § ( \ / / \ \ %4 , - 1 Lh • ® r,Emoo 227 wig k� ` -km § �� \ i 2Co2 � aa - . ! ia / To u) ten—r--X 'W Lv ✓-C LJ SL- n vim-- .12-OnTh nn cy »t-k=tip el 1- �kC -`IC)\ C ,'S- .�- .c z 11)-1-1 *S2-1 rmsv IwUvi hssi-y W a ail"-, o-Q A-o .SL SC 7tc%V L) 5Z a ESL a,—tiv,b 1J3� _ ^ -j) U I . (.31-e t x c�,e-t, y, SZ SZa K�SLJ� � e_.<R,C �\) �ari. Q , o JQ» � -1 .��eQ {�NJ.i o-tA�J C.c+SL`Zp-o " �'"�._-o �L / 6"V-Q4t-J <9-tJ.l V t2,99 . T110-t.L : a i ho . R. liancLA-4.-) O--(‘ t�r� SZ yJ eu pS og ._.J-r-e R 13.�-9-r- �L-r-. .7( ti?,�,.,-ri.Y..s-L�r- cc =c . _E' y. cu. a , cxLw6 easus,,� � � _ on--; cw.J C-Q_ ¢ ca 4 s�() 7 SP u1, / r J J,."- o-M ..S A z - ) V-.c, R- i ci c"rv—LJ . C* c, 1.�, o e (9 , x -,,.2-e eQ cx-SL.> c-JL _t c-. a� ink4.� 1 7 11 4-....P C? u u,L. SAC t-,4=-yTh s `: '--40 Q t eF-Q-e-er-P tt- � y--l`A]aJ rf..:V--N--- 'Yt-4�i r`�'I d.3. XLIt f>�t q x ( 0 :�..-� �-�,,.,._.-ate �.-.-5:' +et� .✓ {J_u.,�1.R�LZ co TVs= oy-O-- fl Q O ooh., A-� Ax_ko c _J rnsThe- Y " ,cH OAt . — Ws- cS--a 3� c2L-crol 11)-) � — S S t 3 c 'r7 j-7"3.1& 1.„„6„/„„(1-- n (2d 5c l 64,62 / STATE OF COLORADO ) ss . COUNTY OF BOULDER ) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of April, 1983 by S Lippincott . r � c Via' •„b ( Yy T otary Public I ie C:.;: .; ;krcit 1, 188 Le ;grrs . _,.ora to C3:01 ro ) C I ri 1 SA O ♦ o � it oa) 'H30 •4 a N O N 4)) • N k O C a) N .H a) +) O rl aS a) -n >1 ›-I 4-1 .0 4 0 a) +) U +) %-1 C nI a • U 0 0 +) a) a JP a) Sa > ) 1 A O •rl C a) C 4) a 4J •rl N 0 ..i ca CO C •rl 0 •H b)-H +V -t) -F) b ra 7 0 0 N `*+ (1) 0 0a) S+ >+roa) .C 0 C -- 4-1 W -ii 4-4 Q', N a-I O C N C >-i 0 co •rl rl • U a) .N ri a) > r4 'ri a3 > 0 .r4 N Sa x .43 C •rl a) a) 4-1 •rl •rI rf) rl u3 •ri1 0 o 4 N in N 00 co aJ a) P+ C a) rd O A a) N -ri a) O A N -ri 01 Al rt C NH C + C a) C 0 M C 0 .0 O aS >14-1 U ' ...� =�., b co -rl H N C Sa Sa C r4 rt D x u 0 •rl C.0 M +) U rI Ma) w y, o N 0 a) +) E r-II ): C O • a >. U Sa E CM co • 0 E0 01 0 H U, Sa Sa 4) 1{ '-. �. U N X o � .3C b) O (a 0 b SA O al O CO % OC _.:._: -r \ .. Ski o b Sa •� 0 a) O Sa C +) b -,I O •,-1- ro N N 0 Z axa a >+ cal 01 NJ".. +) a m 0PIW (3 c 1( 1 lb gilt 1 •E o 35vcn • uc E oo c ■ v o «r� rn g,i x- -- .4S Eus ti. Ce � r OFFICE OF WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR PHONE(303) 3564000, EXT. 256 915 10TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 March 21, 1983 COLORADO TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that I believe an airport does not downgrade an area. In our past experience this has not reduced the value of the land surrounding an airport. Sincerely; t / / ,Cf Al it a/14444,C- H. H. Hansen Weld County Assessor d o 0 H v I 0 HI en H u U u ro H N pa.44 C 3 ITIH m ro -H 0 W kl al 0 0 0 ,C °I W000 O C CO TSa) H -H -H H H HJ >, C 3 >a N ro W H W rH ,) a a W JJ .C W C H al H H al .<X E+ •.CH • CU ID C O O W • a) alH (El . - U N H 0 O 0 W C 7:1H 'd � O a) N • H $4 0 ,C -H O A O Hi 1, -rH >, CO O N >, -rl C H HJ O W A° a 0 O N 11 C YAa • H4-' a) H a) W R Cr H H 'V ° W ° 04HC4J om -HaHaa, ro S' alu •U W >, o C C 3 -P -0 0 4-1 44 4-1 O H O Hro 34 Ra ° ° J 0 co ro > a) H o >1 0. >, wrHH W0 0 0 C CO W 21 alC a) 44 0 0. O N N 3 ° N ,C H N ro HI H U G H .C >, a) > W O A n roa H 0 W W a ° KC EH 0 a u3 CD a.1 C o a•H N U CO O O A a) • C > Uid H) > •rrH W 114 aN) 1°) 4-' FO W W rro1 HI 44 W 0 >, U ro • H a H 0 HJ W C al C Ca N +) r-I • O ro a) >1 •H -P-HA O a ro C co a) ida) 3 H Oa ad W X > H 4 4 HI O -H >, 144 a) -rH 7 Hi R J H I ba N O 0 H A 3 A H H as W JJ O P O ro a O a) W (0 a) U+ >, 3 a v a) W W I a) C W O C u W O O a) .C O H U) H O •H %4 H HJ CO C • 4) .C a) I4-1 al a O rH a) W • >u -H >, W I • C H �° o "I ro ° .C m al H O ° 0 CO U I aH) U C O O ro O a) 00 $-i H W Y a) a .C ro I W ro Hi A -4) $ W N m w a) 7 $4 a)aa)i 0 3 -H HO •Ai A I.C C in W W -H H a) H al .C a-H W H ro aJ a 3 (.3 0 o -H a) KC > a) +) b 34 N H a >, -H C C al >1 0.4 H -U0 W W 0.al ° Z U' o C a CO O w tr H HJ a1 o C a) a) a o O A U' >, oro C ar-H m H -H C •H C C a ° 4 N H +) -34 C H CO ro W C AO • O a) CU H HI -d O a) H u H .C O a) a HI C LO O 1yHy ° >'' E W -H W -H U N W S4' W C) a rH $ girl JJ O rH ro W -H ,C H HJ H >, U ro O W H W H {J -n O ro a) W A >10 ro J 04-30 (134-10. > k b >1 A y Rao O H \ lf1 W > UO C JJ HI 0. a H - W H -H H ,C •• (do$4 H 1°i a ?S .C > A $$4 >r A 3 (a0 3 C N >, CO Ca N • a) a) a/ a O U 4J ro -H a6 HI ro >,X X C -rH W b • -H O off 3 = 000 -P0410) -4-II)0a a) H O .C W E a) W HJ O -H O 3 a)\° \r° P. ,C ,C a N 0 ra co N -.Hi a) H ~ ro m N t W H CO y� ro E U +) C) m rH a W H '3 a .C .-i ri ro A • ba C atl O H H > ro 7 JJ b' al aJ VI a) C T •C \ \ W q N C) H W C W U r) a) O W C X L')4 H O -,H O O -H W [n a o ro rH H 3 o H 'al H a C 3 W 3 w n a a 1 ag O C E a ,in C B ? o2 o o `0 9vM$ egg! to I W . moo 3 0 March 9, 1953 'e S Proposed T;ltralight Airport/Kitely Farm To Planning and Zoning road and 'oa:^c: of 'fl o:"?':1 ss Eo-'or3 'Z o, the undersigned, landowners and tenants living, by or i close proximity to t'.o rropo:ed ultralight facility, do hereby give notice that: we oppose the establishment of such on the Kitoly farm. C1 // (I 3 2(:)117-)./4' )/7CIl� F !� / 1 //_ r /. r' :) -5- JCIY, .3 % /'O/a y /) I') 4 /121'.' ✓ `mil`= � ,� ��1�-z �..'�-- ' C .3 `.'/it, 77, , G K )7,, „L.)//7O o,L- • j/, /Zd/ij (c' iL /I (( ) ' / )/7 J `, -IX et7 y 11/.J - �-m,v „g.✓ efreAcAtz O2 i 0 o Lc .c f,. 2 5-2 Q., X�i Y 1'J 1 tC // _2g g- :'jibi4_ / 4 v n 75_ m//a A e ' , fri14, J. lb 5 CO .a U� (�{ . �� RItJ , 37t (11 E�d ao u nt..6 R.o� `mod'''`c� �'co p —le,0„ /a:4v- /3 7 97 We I? *IC l'-4)4(, 02034 1A)CK a5( dr ' L' c ?o57/ 'o : _ 1 0 O 'd- o ' io _ ,en r'o 1- - Co .1 r0,1P , ,Ii n , n -._ Dosed ' n._ --].L _ C 4 1t'?, do 092.7 - . , )0t2 --P c-'.. -O;;- ,'..3_.1 :".)-10(-. of ,UC o o Gel-- "I. l- � , jr r 3 70 CO( if L'cct ,i 11 Ho ‘t d ,S r l0 ti 7)/0 ill lc�C C< / v % / _ ;7'a Cc,_ CLK", it _ 7 ` 11( 7/a. ..,5/ /: / L./- \ /�- - l�`, ' (_t a.PC ,yIli�. , ,/` st� % f " - -v, l 7AZ r -)-1 ( cam. a ,, T) �.eiytiz e ,2 i .3 0 1,0 ,c ,1�, ? .a4'9 2-ii I 71 ak `1 --O7 ,A.A-t, rj L1 q t< Q 13 c tJ °L (- i S. -z�>c, / / ci 4 .¢/i-j(4 5 4 ed /tom J)72,t671 6_ ps0/ 191; /'ice. I. -.-.1�.-- � / I _ <(/-� z J 111^✓' /& ' 6,L2 13 .<te,.11. 1 K1' / ) C-x 3 E, . "-- r efu ( �1 . a zl,� , ! Wy a Ceak,e..e.e, cucg 5 Aznicri o d 8°3-r/ _iLt gZcr F60,47' A. D. Slater , M.D. VERNON L. CULVER, D.V.M. MILLISSA 1. CULVER, D.V.M. 14534 N.107th St. Longmont, Colo.80501 Telephone:772-3688 February l'-,, -ISU its : iota ti.1 __ay( ftooES of `Tltr -lir;'. t sdrcs-sift 0:1 iivestoc'. .. erajsions Jear .Lirs ; ?.e advefsD ofoffscts of u1t _-_, "ot aircraft ca-.. be classified as 50010 'ro s _ Ed some , %o- thetical, ri c _th case, if you ass - the si -.-Ts t1/2 rt �� ,r' cf eoLn > > sense, it �ce�les � does _ isiariimation to fic.u-r out t _ ct involved with t` operation „Ch.l cil :_i _rl be r , ;- sis beat a bonofi'L. devotsS, s sssestSILOS Sisie ] to SSe a C to, ;r 1 l .s ..JO i et rj 1 , iDJJ- (0 c lei ^ i3i;- creel 9 nEnLid, 1s nosdYssbla to o . .l ste ya ] .. _1 .1.Thcto:ss thtt could.. T.)70v0 a e SL e is-s financial 11 011.1'.. t,.. . •o the sistontissi :He csusisis. csttls to Us - o cer. . -r 0 1 Iii. .. U ].V � 'OLD 1 , ", .. �,�, ii i�� - '.l:,t .. _.jury o t, _ - . herd < _ , or asy 0fl. Uo:. •:.I. 10ec ' S , a a .,accur 0 1. r vs , so in u r _ ; icul', to t a.b S[1. S,. . 'ono- Hiss tbst Sae 3 ma 1_' top ill t.; i. d, VERNON L. CULVER, D.V.M. MILLISSA 1. CULVER, D.V.M. 14534 N.107th St. Longmont, Colo.80501 Telephone:772-3688 p.. c': 1'O O1, .- rl i, _ r] onr. of any , 'LU?© , O""1 1 ..5% „ nt ii il1 I 1d 0 SL, .. _7 ' Ji D 1O 'IO ODL lc Li l,il- ;O '.UZ D- 1 'n"'1 aG. , Vonann. 41 Hello