The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About810514.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AGRIBUSINESS PERMIT FOR DOUGLAS HOWARD, 3226 EAST 18TH STREET, GREELEY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 14th day of October, 1981, at the hour of 2: 00 o'clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners for the purpose of hearing the application of Douglas Howard, 3226 East 18th Street, Greeley, Colorado, for a Use by Special Review for an agribusiness, livestock and implement trailers, on the following described real estate, to-wit: A parcel of land located in part of the Southeast quarter, Section 11, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. WHEREAS, Section 24. 4 . 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Use by Special Review, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the petitioner and the recom- mendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter, and having been fully informed, finds that: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24. 7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24. 4. 2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policies which promotes agribusiness uses. Further, it is within the City of Greeley Planning Area and the city has no objections to the use; The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agri- cultural Zone District in that the proposed use does not interfere with other agricultural activities in the area or the County; The activities proposed will be compatible with existing agricultural and rural residential uses in the neigh- borhood aswell as with projected development in the -)10 31 Page 2, USR, F \RD, DOUGLAS (future uses will be of a re- sidential nature -Ind the intended proposal will not have significant traffic or noise impacts, nor will it require significant improvements which might create incompatibility) ; No overlay Districts affect the site; The proposal to locate the site within existing improvements serves to negate any impacts on produc- tive agricultural land; and Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners that the application of the petitioner for a Use by Special Review for an agribusiness on the hereinabove described tract of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The following Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted: a. The use is for the sale and distribution of live- stock and implement trailers, additional activity may be parking of associated delivery vehicles used in transporting said trailers. b. Design Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24. 5 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. c. Operation Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24. 6 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. d. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regula- tions. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. e. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revo- cation of the Permit by the Board of County Commis- sioners. 2 . The plat for the Use Permit be placed of record by the Department of Planning Service' s staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; and 3. Pursuant to the City of Greeley recommendations the map be amended to show the following items: Additional right-of-way (be shown as "reserved for future right-of-way") be added for a total of 40 feet along the west side of the property. Page 3, USR, HUwtiRD, DOUGLAS Reference to limitation of use area to the western 400 feet of the property. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of October, A.D. , 1981. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Aye Chu Carlson, hairman Absent Norman Car_lson,, Pro Tem X ./i/ Aye C. W. Kirby Aye T. Martin c_ Aye e K. Steinmark ATTEST: Y-. - .r. WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE AR De uty County erk AP RO ED AS TO / ORM: c County Attorney DATE PRESENTED: OCTOBER 19, 1981 -' - E _ :7-1L ter: :;TY CL L.. .x.21' Date September 15, 1981 Case No. USR ^\ APPLICATION OF Douglas Howard ti ADDRESS 3226 East 18th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 �`. Jerry Keifer that 'h, _.' 17c, 177 _rtroduced Be it Resolved by the Wald County Flanninc Co-mission that the application for site approval of an agri-business covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: part of the SEA, Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado be recommended (favorably) (i 1 ) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies which promotes agribusiness uses. Further, it is within the city of Greeley Planning Area and the city has no objection to the use; - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District in that the proposed use does not interfere with other agricultural activities in the area or the County; - The activities proposed will be compatible with existing agricultural and rural residential uses in the neighborhood as well as with projected development in the'future (future uses will be of a residential nature, and the intended proposal will not have significant traffic or noise Motion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote: For Passage Jerry Keifer Against Passage Wilber Wafel Betty Kountz Don Billings Bob Ehrlich Fred Otis The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good , Recording Secretary of the Meld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on September 15, 1981 and recorded in Book No.VII of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 17 day of September , 19 81. Secretary \ Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners Douglas Howard USR-467:81:22 September 15, 1981 Page 2 and the intended proposal will not have significant traffic or noise impacts, nor will it require significant improvements which might create incompatibility) ; - No Overlay Districts affect the site; - The proposal to locate the site within existing improvements serves to negate any impacts on productive agricultural land; and - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The following conditions are recommended for the proposal: 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special REview be adopted; 2. The plat for the use permit be placed or record by the Department of Planning Service's staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; and 3. Pursuant to the city of Greeley recommendations the map be amended to show the following items: - Additional right-of-way (be shown as "reserved for future right-of- way") be added for a total of 40 feet along the west side of the property. - Reference to limitation of use area to the western 400 feet of the property. 1 DOUGLAS HOWARD SUP-476:81:22 STANDARDS FOR USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW 1. The use is for the sale and distribution of livestock and implement trailers additional activity may be parking of associated delivery vehicles used in transporting said trailers. 2. Design Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.5 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 3. Operations Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 4. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 5. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above stated Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. TEH:rjg B-22 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 15, 1981 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on September 15, 1981 at 1:30 p.m. in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, 915 10th Street, Centennial Building, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Fred Otis. Tape 69 - Side 2 Roll Call: Jack Holman Excused absence Jerry Kiefer Present Wilbur Wafel Present Bob Halleran Excused absence Fred Otis Present Bette Kountz Present Don Billings Present Bob Ehrlich Present Bill Diehl Excused absence Also present: Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney and Bobbie Good, Secretary. A quorum was present. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commis- sion held on September 1, 1981 was approved as distributed. CASE NUMBER - SUP-472:81:18 APPLICANT - Erie Water and Sanitation District SUBJECT - Wastewater Treatment Plant - Continued from August 18, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - NW4, Section 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION - 12 miles north of Erie APPEARANCE: Richard Lyons, Attorney for the District, reported the district wishes a new sewer system for the town. The current sewer system has received complaints from the State that they are not in compliance with the state standards. They are either going to upgrade the present sewer system, or put in a new sewer system. If upgraded it would only allow for approximately twenty-five new sewer taps, which the town feels is inadequate. There has been new growth and development in the town of Erie, and the old system is no longer adequate. They have not arranged for funding of any kind at this time, understanding that a special use permit is the first step to be taken in the process of putting in a new sewer. Keith Bell, Engineer for the Erie Water and Sanitation District appeared before the Planning Commission. Tape 70 - Side 1 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 2 Mr. Bell explained the various locations investigated for locating this site, the soils composition of each site and the location of each site. He explained the process of treatment, purification of liquid effluents and disposal of waste solids planned for the plant. Discussion from the members of the Weld County Planning Commission was directed to Mr. Bell and Mr. Lyons. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Service's staff and the Development Standards. The chairman, Fred Otis asked Mr. Lyons and Mr. Bell if they were aware of the recommenda- tions and if they felt they could live with these standards; to which they replied they had copies of these documents and felt they were reasonable. Discussion from the Audience: Bennie Bruntz, Westview Estates expressed the views of himself and other residents of this subdivision. He felt there were surely other areas a sewer could be located except right next to a subdivision. The residents are concerned that: 1. their water table would be lowered because of the dewatering process; 2. most of the properties have shallow wells for domestic use; 3. who would be responsible for odor control; and 4. who would be responsible for weed control, etc. While it has been stated a full-time employee would be provided to take care of the plant, the town of Erie sewer site is a "sad mess" now with weeds overgrowing the property. If they cannot afford to maintain this site properly, how can they afford to maintain the new site according to specifications? Many residents of Westview Subdivision are too low to be able to hook onto the sewer, therefore, they will not benefit from it. Also, this subdivision is extremely swampy and there is concern that the wells will be contaminated, or if it rains the sewer may overflow. Roelof Elting, a farmer, who lives on County Line Road stated County Line road was built up three or four feet and, therefore, acts as a dyke to hold any overflow of water from Coal Creek where it crosses County Line Road rather than letting it drain into Boulder Creek and run-off as a natural course of events. Because of this Coal Creek floods the area, including the Westview Subdivision. If the sewer were to drain into Coal Creek and flood this area, what would the consequences be? Tape 70 - Side 2 John Heffner of Westview Estates expressed his concern about the location of the sewer next to Westview Subdivision. He also wondered why other areas with a gravel base could not have be used for the sewer site. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 3 Ron Stow, Weld County Health Department reported he had spoken to Mr. Sam Cooper of the State Health Department, but did not receive a comment. Therefore, the Weld County Health Department is withholding their recommenda- tions pending the recommendations of the State Health Department and the State Board of Health. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney explained the process this applica- tion would have to go through and be approved by, following the Weld County Planning Commission recommendation. Even if the Planning Commission were to recommend denial, the State takes final action on this and could override their decision. The Planning Commission inquired about another expert opinion from some source, perhaps the Weld County Engineering Department, as to whether this is the best site in regard to soils tests, etc. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator stated the Department of Planning Service's staff does not have expertise in all areas, therefore, they rely on areas with that expertise to give them an opinion when referrals are made up on a particular case. In instances such as this, the staff relies on the Weld County Health Department and the State Health Department for expertise in their areas. Tape 71 - Side 1 George Montano appeared from the audience. He stated he had lived in the town of Erie all his life and has been watching it go backwards. Erie water is bad. A few years ago when a new water system was installed they were assured this would solve most of their problems, then it was discovered it was installed improperly. It was his feeling the Engineer, Mr. Bell, was much like a new car salesman. His primary interest is to sell the town of Erie this project. MOTION: Jerry Keifer moved that the Weld County Planning Commission continue the Erie Wastewater and Sanitation District application for a Special Use Permit until the next regular meeting, Tuesday, October 6, 1981, at 1:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Bette Kountz. Discussion was called for from the members of the Planning Commission. Don Billings felt a decision should be made today and not postponed until the next meeting. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their decision. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilber Wafel - no; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings - no; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried with four voting for continuance and two voting against. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 4 A recess was called by the Chairman. CASE NUMBER - CUP-7O:81:3 APPLICANT - Windsor Assembly of God SUBJECT - Sanctuary and Parsonage LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Part of the SW4, Section 17, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado APPEARANCE - The Reverand James Dunn, Pastor of the Windsor of God Church reported the church had made an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build a sanctuary and parsonage for the church. At a later date they also hope to build a church school, but these plans are not imminent. The town of Windsor has no objection to this request, except they have requested they be connected to the town of Windsor water supply. They would prefer using North Weld water, as it would be much more economical for them. Both water services are available to them. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator, read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Service's staff and reviewed the Development Standards. He wished to call to the Planning Commission's attention that three entities have requested soils reports and subsurface water tables be checked to determine special needs (if any) prior to any building foundation design being done. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. MOTION: Bob Ehrlich moved CUP-70:81:13 be recommended for approval to the Board of County Commissioners along with all conditions and standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Service's staff. Motion was seconded by Betty Kountz. Discussion by the Planning Commission. Jerry Keifer informed the applicant the Planning Commission tries to go along with the town's recommendation when an application for use is within their comprehensive plan, which this obviously is. Therefore, the recommenda- tion regarding use of Windsor water has not been changed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the member for a vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilbur Wafel - yes; Bette Kountz - yes; Don Billings - no; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried by majority vote with five voting for the motionand one against. CASE NUMBER - SUP-476:81:22 APPLICANT - Douglas Howard SUBJECT - Agri-Business (livestock trailers) LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Part of the SEA, Section 17, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 5 APPEARANCE - Douglas Howard appeared in his own behalf. He explained he and his wife can run this business from their home if their application for a Special Use Permit is accepted. There would probably never be more than ten or fifteen trailers on the lot at any one time. Much of their business is wholesale and done by telephone sales. They have a large lot, with adequate lighting already installed. There would be little increase in traffic. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Service's staff, along with the Development Standards and Comments. He asked the Planning Commission to be aware of ##3 of the staff's recommenda- tions concerning the recommendation of the city of Greeley regarding additional right-of-way. The Chairman asked Mr. Howard if he was aware of the contents of the recommendations and development standards. He stated he was. MOTION: Jerry Keifer moved the Planning Commission accept the recommendations and Development Standards for use by Special Review made by the Department of Planning Service's staff and that they be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with recommendation for approval. Motion seconded by Bette Kountz. The Chairman called for discussion from the Planning Commission. There was none. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilbur Wafel - yes; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings - yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER - SUP-475:81:21 APPLICANT - Colhalar Company, Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - SEA, Section 13, T3N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. SUBJECT - Alcohol Production Facility APPEARANCE - Ken Colgan who stated they want to build a small alcohol production plant to use in conjunction with their cattle feeding business. They are now in the process of obtaining the necessary permit for their water. This will be quite a small plant and will only produce about 500 gallons of alcohol a day. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 6 Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator reviewed the recommendations of the Depart- ment of Planning Service's staff along with the Development Standards. He asked the Planning Commission to be aware of #3 of the recommendations regarding soils tests and foundation investigation prior to a building permit being applied for. The Chairman asked the applicant if he was aware of the contents of these documents. He stated he was. MOTION: Bob Ehrlich moved SUP-475:81:21 along with the Department of Planning Service's staff recommendations and Development Standards be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the recommendation for approval. The Chairman called for discussion by the Planning Commission. There was none. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilber Wafel - yes; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried by unanimous decision. There was no further business. The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bobbie Good Secretary rjg/ A public hearing was conducted on October 14 , 1981 at 2 : 00 P.M. , with the following present: CHUCK CARLSON CHAIRMAN NORMAN CARLSON PRO TEM, Excused BILL KIRBY COMMISSIONER JOHN MARTIN COMMISSIONER JUNE STEINMARK COMMISSIONER Also present: ACTING CLERK TO THE BOARD, Jeannette Ordway AS�I-S•TMT COUNTY ATTORNEY, Thomas 0. David PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE, Tom Honn The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated on September 28, 1981, duly published on October 1, 1981 in the Johnstown Breeze, a public hearing was held on the request of Douglas Howard for a Use by Special Review for an agribusiness, livestock and implement trailer operation. Mr. Douglas Howard was present for the hearing and reviewed his plans. The Weld County Planning Commission recommended that this request be approved with conditions and development standards. No one in attendance at the hearing was opposed to the granting of said use by special review. After all the testimony was received, Commissioner Steinmark made a motion to approve this request, the conditions, and the development standards. Commissioner Kirby seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. IAN r: "i +':. o BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: /.�� vim- .�-- //‘ /4.^JC�t pilty County Clerk DO IT# 81-48 TAPE#` 81-71 LHR 2087 Date: Sei ter 15, 1981 CASE NUMBER: SUP-467:81:22 NAME: nouglas Howard REQUEST: Agribusiness (Livestock Trailers) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: part of the SE4j Section 11, T5N, R65W LOCATION: 2 miles east of Greeley. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Service's staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies which promotes agribusiness uses. Further, it is within the city of Greeley Planning Area and the city has no objection to the use; - The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District in that the proposed use does not interfere with other agricultural activities in the area or the County; - The activities proposed will be compatible with existing agricultural and rural residential uses in the neighborhood as well as with projected development in the future (future uses will be of a residential nature and the intended proposal will not have significant traffic or noise impacts, nor will it require significant improvements which might create incompatibi- lity) ; - No Overlay Districts affect the site; - The proposal to locate the site within existing improvements serves to negate any impacts on productive agricultural land; and - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provide adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The following conditions are recommended for the proposal: 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted; 2. The plat for the use permit be placed or record by the Department of Planning Service's staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; and 3. Pursuant to the city of Greeley recommendations the map be amended to shwo the following items: - Additional right-of-way(be shown as "reserved for future right-of-way")be added for a total of 40 feet.along the west side of the property. - Reference to limitation of use area to the western 400 feet of the property. 804-80-042 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3564000 EXT 404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 ... :., , t. ,,,, Yam, 4 August 10, 1981 ,,:t ,_ ::4 ti .,..;,,,. a COLORADO Mr. Douglas Howard 3226 East 18th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Request for a a special use permit for an Agri-Business on a parcel of land described as Lot A of Recorded Exemption 265, located in the SE', Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Howard Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, September 15, 1981 at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Greeley Plan- ning Commission for their review and comments. Please contact Ken McWilliams for further details regarding the date, time and place of this meeting. According to our records the Greeley Planning Commission will meet on September 8, 1981. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Greeley Planning Commission to answer any questions the members may have may have with respect to to your application. Please be aware that the Department of Planning Services staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Planning Services office a few days before the date of the hearing to obtain that recommendation. Mr. Douglas Howard September 10, 1981 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, o'r- a \-\--c,\�ti-, , Thomas E. Honn `.i el Zoning Administrator TEH:rjg cc: City of Greeley Planning Commission, c/o Ken McWilliams, City Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 r j ) y ,L V) •: ,,.LR: Cor.pleb_:' -as 1,2,al;!2 '1 A:.1yolra3:tcsinthe'e.c.a<.RNTO"spaceon c' re,,,Ise. RICE PT FOR CEIRT F !D [IJAUL -a - - I V. 1, 'hr fc,Co. ••g r_n.cc. ..ed(�'=-'s one,) NO INSURANCE COVERAGE MOVICED— r n Show to v 1:om and date dc' ,..7,2_..........._- ' NOT FOR I%TERNATIONA!L!L O show to whom,data and ads :Es of dehvery..._ (See Reverse) P 4 A SENT TO av O P.ESTRIETED E£L1V£RY Douglas Howard 8 Show tow l'om and date dclitd c:' --G O RESTR FED DELIVERY. STREET.Douglas NO Show to whom,date,and ad.1r_ss cf eivery.$_ 3226 East 18th St. P O,STATE AND ZIP CODE (CONSULT POSTE°ASTER FOR FEES) Greeley, Colo. 80631 - POSTAGE $ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: CERTIFIED FEE in Douglas Howard C c 3226 East 18th Street W SPECIAL DELIVERY e z Greeley, Colorado 80631 I RESTRICTED DELIVERY C' y _ n - - v u_ - - - lm9 3. ARTICLE LE_:.RIPT..'�:a: G•.J w w w DA-tSH0JT01NHE AND C n RLC!STEFICO1.O. C?.T1a:3:ED No. INSURED NO. DA'tDEL'IVERED ,J 71 W ,T, SHO'WT0e;HOt1 DATE - P26 0274181 c~ra A'•DAC0RESS0F C rt - - 2 ¢ u� DELIVERY 4) (A'6Y1y'i C�-LY3.fl s•b=�at'.ig3 of a.=La'r_.saB or 8 *1S) DELIVERED TO WHOM ANDRES DATE - 1 11ava tecc:.cd d.j artadc d_ccribed abe a, ti C Fl TH RESTRICED c` n « DEL:VERY C II S7G':.TUr ! Addres ee C7Auf1 arSze l agent ca SH::JT0WH0M DATER%D U AD0RtSS OF 0LLIVERY C.'w C �1A m RESTRICTED DELIVERY � 2�� <' �L $ � 4 POSTMARK a TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES a .�7c Or L tif`:C rY il POSTMARK OR DATE ?E o t.DD._a3S IGcr.-,Icte o:-'y if request • oo t / rr r• • E 8-10-81 z ''5` ,i u. L:1ALLE TO DELIVER Cl^_A.:SC. CLEF:, to l%:TLALS • a_, *GEO.is T9::_.4_J Date: August 3, 1981 To Weld County Planning Commission Subject: Special Use Permit Howard' s Trailer Sales is a small business comprised of Douglas Howard, a licensed Colorado dealer, and his wife, Sandra Howard, a licensed Colorado salesperson. This is the source of income for the Howard family. Horse, stock and implement trailers are the main items sold. Mr. Howard is both a dealer and a distributor. The trailers are presently purchased in Colorado and Oklahoma and the Howards have a pickup truck and a semi truck and trailer for use in bringing them in from the manufac- turing locations. A stock of approximately fifteen trailers would be average for inventory kept on hand. The business is not one to create traffic, congestion or noise. The trailer business has a quiet atmosphere with people shopping individually and in small numbers. The business is not only to support the Howard household but it is hoped the business is one which serves the agricultural community by making good safe economical trailers available in an area where livestock and farm commodoties are on the move. Your considerations are greatly appreciated. Thank you. ilat >74/'-'r-71 Doug as Howard San ra Howard _ _ _ , sup 476 ' b1 . ZZ P . C . HEL7fnz: Ea-: - can . : 4° DouL#6 uoutt ire" S_ ze of Parcel : Staff JeyoeT to Contact : 8s i- Le al Description : . , FV. SEq dco l l TEO aGs--1.,) zmats ea,c-J cr41 ‘re-e,e,ti - Co "?--cQ 5 O 9 . Existing Zoni-gig: A Request : . • Uv 424s 1 #c --k ..e.A.-- .1.(2._$ Possible Issues Summarized from Application la"te"rials:- NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Use By Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET NO. 81-48 APPLICANT Douglas Howard 3226 East 18th Street Greeley, CO 80631 DATE: October 14, 1981 TIME: 2: 00 P.M. REQUEST: Use By Special Review - agribusiness, livestock & implement trailers LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the Southeast quarter, Section 11, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado BY: Mary Ann Feuerstein County Clerk & Recorder and Clerk to the Board By: Keitha White, Deputy DATED: September 28, 1981 PUBLISHED: October 1, 1981 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE County Commissioners of Weld F.County, Colorado Weld County STATE OF COLORADO ) Centennial Center, 915 10th Street,Greeley,Colorado,at the ) SS time specified All persons in ) any maanner interested in the COUNTY OF WELD equ By Special ttn and may be I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I heard am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the that the same is a weekly newspaper e Weld and Planning s so certified yCommis- printed, in whole or in part, and published sion may be examined in the in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, and has a general circulation therein, that ' located in the Weld County published Centennial Center, 915 loth said newspaper has been Street,l Third Floor, Greeley, f continuously and uninterruptedly in said DOCKET NO.81-48 County of Weld for a period of more than APPLICANT fifty-two consecutive• weeks prior to the Douglas Howard first publication of the annexed legal notice 8Gr eley18CO806eet • or advertisement; that said newspaper has DATE: October 14, 1981 been admitted to the United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions of TIME: 2:00 P.M. the Act of March 3, 1879, or any REQUEST: Use By Special amendments thereof, and that said Review-agribusiness,livestock & implement trailer newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly LEGAL DESCRIPTION qualified for publishing legal notices and Part of the Southeast quarter, advertisements within the meaning of the Section 11 Township 5 North, laws of the State of Colorado Ranga 65 West of the 6th P M, Weld County, Colorado That the annexed legal notice or advertise- Board of County ment was published in the regular and Commissioners Weld County, entire issue of every number of said weekly Colorado newspaper for the period of .!. consecu- by:M AnnF eerrireln tive insertions; and that the first RecorderR andClerk publication of said notice w in the issue of to the Board said newspaper dated,..? .e..., A D 1 ./., By•Keitha White,Deputy and that the last publication of said notice DATED September 28, 1981 was in the issue of said newspaper dated PUBLISHED. October 1, 1981 Co Legal 811.187-Clerk to the - , A.D. 19 Board In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this ...2_ day of iC)c 7.- A.D. 19.67. .C-- .C,‘', Publisher • Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the County of Weld,S ite of Colorado, this, . rd day of L'it-i-c A.D. 19.x/ !,./,..,. .z. tary Public. '/,J-,., LeuXs 4 My commission expires /� :. ./,8/ .?r, el rirfidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Weld, I Paula A. Barton of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am an advertising derk of THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN that the same is a daily newspaper of general circulation and printed and published in the City of Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive (days) ( met); that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication of said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a lidt►ce PurwaM*prat 8OMnia l S of Me State supplement thereof; that the first publication of said of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,a public hearing will be held notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Col bearing date orado,Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street,Greeley,Colorado,at the time specified All persons in any Fifth manner interested in the Use By Special Review are requested to attend and may be heard day of October A.D. 19 81 • BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of newspaper bearing date the County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial Center,915 10th Street,Third Floor,Greeley,Colorado Fifth DOCKET NO 81 48 APPLICANT Douglas Howard day of October A.D. 19 3226 East 18th Street Greeley, CO 80631 19810631 that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley DATEOctober TIME 2 00 P M Republican, has been published continuously and REQUEST Use By Special Review — agribusiness, livestock & implement uninterruptedly during the period of at least six trailer LEGAL DESCRIPTION months next prior to the first issue thereof contained Part of the Southeast quarter,Section 11,Township 5 North,Range 65 West of said notice or advertisement above referred to;that said the 6th P M,Weld County,Colorado Board of County newspaper has been admitted to the United States Commissioners Weld County,Colorado mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the BY Mary Ann Feuerstein County Clerk&Recorder Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and and Clerk to the Board By Keitha White,Deputy that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified DATED.lSeptemberDailTribune for publishing legal notices and advertisements within The Greeley Daily Tribune Qcts,,911 the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. October 5 , 1981 Total charge: $12.47 Advertising Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of October A.D. 1981 My commission expires Notary Public �2Gff7 FLOW SHLET • # ,I,pg.7 ,ii/ la .1 _ Ne I— CAS):REQUEST: - i'(. . LEGAL: . SE4 ≤ -L --.-, 1 1 1 T5 (213's Ui bi. & C� Z(OS LOCATION: �y . 2 T°�.ILS eon ► DATE BY , Application Received 7 - 3( )</(i& Application Application Fee - Receipt # //g28 - /. i1 Recording Fee 3.57 // t/ Application Complete (I /( P.C. Hearing Date: gpl IS 8- / // Letter to Applicant Drafted Referrals Listed /1 4( Field Check by D.P.S . Staff q — I4 /1 File Assembled U- 1 6 - 73 1 -kli_c\ Referrals Mailed 73 - 16 - Rl - Chaindexed ?1 - 10 --% \ 0\ Notification of Applicant , S - 10 - k .xt Surrounding Property Owners Researched O\t- ' ,'(` l Airphoto/Vicinity Map Preapred '-\--t eA \\ SProperty Owners Notified by : S - i(1 ,W ►fil h \ ) Agendas Mailed by: Si JI . . Legal Approved by County Attorney ��//��, Referrals - Complete 9 (0`sl G�<Y-). Preliminary D.P.S. Staff Comments i— lO-$ ( // Staff Conference �j :::: e::::::tion : S. ' 1//21) P.C. Resolution q- n.%‘ '''''O r� Case Sent to Clerk to Board ' °1,-18--�$k -mil i C.C. Hearing 1C) -614 Action : _�� t 0 ` bt`r a cit , C.C. Resolution Received 10'"64 History Card Complete C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting Drafted on Mylar \-A%—(Ps ' Q5— Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder P.C. Minutes °I'1$ '(b1 .)...,0 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street . Greeley , Colorado 80631 PHONE : 356-4000 Ext . 400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : c Permit Fee : oo at Case Number : SIR -46:81 0-6 Recording Fee : _ 35'7 App . Checked by : Receipt No . : TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE- MENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures . I , (we ) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Special Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use Permit is proposed : LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 0961-11-4-RE265 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AREA : SAME STREET LOCATION : 3226 E. 18th St. , Greeley, CO 80631 ZONE : PROPOSED USE : HOWARD' S TRAILER SALES Sales of horse, livestock & implement trailers FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : NAME : Douglas Gene Howard ADDRESS : 3226 E. 18th St. TEL : 353-9618 NAME : Sandra Mae Howard ADDRESS : Same TEL : Same NAME : ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all state- ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge . COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) jaz,e,..-4 24`-i ignat�� wne��thorized Agent Subscri bed ans sworn to before me this 3rd day of AUGUST , 1 981 . • Y277 aSEAL Notary P ,.� 4C1./.1 ublic My commission expires : My Cam,-,issiaa f x;;irrs Ail 13, SA. REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Douglas Howard CASE NUMBER: SUP-476:81:22 SENT REFERRALS OUT: August 10, 1981 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY September 9, 1981 z z o z o cn 0 0 cn H H m ff 6 cc O U H Z 0 0 c) Z Z W H P+ p 6 H W h FTC C!) O W o R+ 0 0 O g al o Z n r4 Z 0 P4 W Z County Attorney (plat only) West Greeley Soil Conservation 4302 West 9th Street Road / Weld County Health Department Greeley, Colorado 80634 ✓ XX Engineering Department Betty Kountz 22708 Weld County Road 52 XX County Extension Agent Greeley, Colorado 80631 Z. Colorado Geological Survey XX 1313 Sherman Street Room 703 Denver, Colorado 80203 Colorado Water Conservation Board Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 State Engineer Division of Water Resources Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Highway Department 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 City of Greeley Planning Dept. c/o Ken McWilliams City Complex Greeley, Colorado 80631 E _ELEY,Cl'_r. -.... August 10, 1981 SUP:476:81:22 COLORADO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: • Enclosed is an application from Douglas Howard for an Agri-business Special Use Permit - The parcel of land is described as Lot A of RE 265 located in the SEA, Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 22 miles east of the city of Greeley This application is submitted to your office for review and recommendations. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be ap- preciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the pro- posal and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be interpsetbtish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to If lepond within 14 day that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address d may give esslisted above.ov . Please creply by September 9, 1981 so that on to your recommendation. does 1. We have reviewed that / does comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: not) 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan but we feel this request (is/ is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons : 3. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 4. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • sinned Agency Date Thank you very much for your help and co-operation in this matter. • Y?rto �torr Zoning Administrator - ^� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERV ICES PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT 4n( 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 7:1 [It August 10, 1981 I7 ,® CASE NUMBER SUP-476:81:22 • COLORADO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Douglas Howard for an Agri-business Special Use Permit The parcel of land is described as Lot A of RE 265 located in SE%, Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 21/2 miles east of the city of Greeley This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by September 9, 1981 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed Agency Date_ O QA b vn Y1 Zoning Administrators_ �H0 --- DEL-- -'- '=-",'E',1" v , J - PHONE (303 356-4000 EX- G, PiE `- --- G=EELEY,CO-2^:..,_ ir p: - ---7:, r: August 10, 1981 CASE NUMBER SUP-476:81:22 - - �•,•,y CO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from Douglas Howard for a n Agri-business Special Use Permit • The parcel of land is described as Lot A of RE 265 located in SEA, Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 21/2 miles east of the city of Greeley This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any couuuents or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by September 9, 1981 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed� w the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests . � A4,,, 2. A formal recommendation is under consider- Cion:) d will be submitted to you prior to f,�� `s 1' 3 , Please refer to the enclosed letter,'-2 AUKa` 2' ,T,f, SI Signed7gt,(0/ / Agency �J€ ,Co ts‘ • q Aate_ _.5-.2�'• (9f-. 1tn.o W.QA C R b v- Yl Zoning Administrator c\ - P-4ON6 (3: 356-400C. EY- Gf Cp+o GREELEv,CO_ 1 Y O5 f. 10, 1981 -._.. : CASE NUMBER SUP-476:81:22 y �._ s COLORADO REFERRAL • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Douglas Howard for a n Agri-business Special Use Permit The parcel of land is described as Lot A of RE 265 located in SE4j Section 11, T5N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 21/2 miles east of the city of Greeley This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions. Any confluents or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by September 9, 1981 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. f/ We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests . 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter. �5F7 c;y(2 Signed .r� 1�ca. mac, Agency . . GQ `.. s ,Date -6 gl Well C©anti 6, nov,.%n�i �b vnr, Zoning Administrator . .nom""`' • - 1 i AP' 117 *tglaWili' GREELEY CIVIC CENTER August 26, 1981 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 g PHONE (303) 353.6123 Mr. Thomas E. Honn Zoning Administrator Weld County Dept . of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Honn: The Greeley Planning Commission reviewed the request by Douglas Howard for a Special Use Permit for a horse, stock, and implement trailer sales facility. The Commission had no objections to the specific use proposed provided: 1 . The use is limited to the western 400 feet of the site, and; 2. The right-of-way needed (40' east of centerline) for the upgrading of Hemlock Avenue is reserved. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project . Sincerely, 4-e--1/:")10?C2?-&1246.../ Ken McWilliams City Planner KM:yip ��y�'zn?87��' • T- K "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" _.. 0414144192.11144 ()VC() o ul RICHARD D. LAMM * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR , . Director 2870 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303PORMA 86b-2611 August 25, 1981 Mr. Thomas Haun Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Haun: RE: SUP 476:81:22, HOWARD'S TRAILER SALES We have no objection to approval of this application. Sincerely, Julia E. Turney Engineering Geologist It cc: LUC i.f GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE CD �� `�4® /63JUN "9 1975 0 © Recorded at -� o'clock..if M., R 1'-; Lv • Reception No 1662344 Si VA PHEH ' "Recorder. sr) THIS DEED, Made this Sixth day of June RECORDER'S STAMP 19 75,between I DONALD H. McWILLIAMS and BETTE B. McWILLIAMS , en t �' of the County of Weld and State of State Documentary 7 - JUN " z, t--1 - Colorado,of the first part,and Date 6 ° _ _ 6 , O •o DOUGLAS G. HOWARD and SANDRA M. HOWARD o r1 of the County of Weld and State of Colorado,of the second part: • WITNESSETH,that the said parties of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of 0 a• Other good and valuable consideration and Ten ($10.00) DOLLARS, .o co to the said part ies of the first part in hand paid by the said parties of the second part,the receipt whereof is ;1.4 o hereby confessed and acknowledged,ha ye granted, bargained,sold and conveyed,and by these presents do O O grant,bargain,sell,convey and confirm unto the said parties of the second part,their heirs and assigns forever,not o in tenancy in common but in joint tenancy,all the following described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying and to being in the County of Weld and State of Colorado,to wit: r— A parcel of land located in the Southeast Qarter _(SE%) of Section 11, Township ,_ a` 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. Being more CN particularly described as follows: Beginning at the South Quarter Corner (S%Cor) 1 = of said Section 11 and considering the South line of the Southeast Quarter (S�Ea) gg --) of said Section 11 as bearing South 89°09'40" East, with all other bearings ---4 contained herein being relative thereto; Thence South 89°09'40" East along said South line 1317.66 feet to the Southeast Corner of the Southwest Quarter of the : Southeast Quarter (SECor SW4SE4) of said Section 11• Thence continuing South 89u09'40" ast along said South line, 22.60 feet; Thence North 01°51'24" East, 211.29 feet; Thence North 29°25'27" East, 1289.81 feet; Thence North 89°32'52" West, 1975.76 feet to a point on the West line of the Southeast Quarter SEa) of said Section 11; Thence South 00012'41" West along said West line, 1330.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with Four (4) shares of the capital stock of the Delta Irrigation Company; together with all grantor's interests and rights in and to all oil, gas, gravel and minerals on and under said lands. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders,rents,issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said parties of the first part,either in law or equity,of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the said parties of the second part,their heirs and assigns forever.And the said parties of the first part,for them eel yes ,theiTheirs,executors,and administrators do covenant,grant,bargain and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these pres- ents they are well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and have good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bar- gain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid,and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants bargains, saes liens, taxes, assessments d cn brance of wh er kind to soever. subject to the eneral faxes or he year ya 197s due and payaoie in.fr covenants, conditions, reservations, a ulations easements and rig ts'o oway of record or use; subject to the lien of a mortgage to the Federal Land Bank of Wichita in.the sum of $36,000.00 executed or to be executed by the grantees aniime above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns,against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said part ies of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said part ies of the first part have hereunto set theiVd and seal the day and year first above written. 4 �, .-1 Signed,Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of ©'�-��t li' i \ j..tm x?;t,ASEAL] Donald H. McWilliams [SEAL] LA" & /1� , Or'[SEAL] STATE OF COLORADO, Bette B. McWilliams ii,��,,,,� : ptyof Weld les. r� .s.fgYg4`iefra ineii_Was acknowledged before me this Sixth day of June }s�7.5' A� o FI r.'McWi lliams and Bette B. McWilliams ., ; _� jj,,} (‘‘_l.,"'-' 40 ,: espii ,19 .Witnes y hand and official seal. !'•'''r:•; ; •".re Gol:mlssbon e;i s,es.fur. d-Z /7 . • ��% F a Gi Q,L�� Notary Milo. 1�its" r.•,No.921. WARRANTY DEED—To Joint Tenants.—Bradford Publishing Co.,1824-46 Stout Street,Denver,Colorado —3-74 *If by natural person or persons here insert name and names; if by person acting in representative or official capacity or as attorney-in-fact, then insert name of person as executor, attorney-in-fact or other capacity or description; if by officer or cor- poration then insert name of such officer or officers as the president or other officers of such corporation, naming it.—statutory Acknowledgement, Sec. 118-6-1 Colorado Revised Statutes 1953. CERTTFTCATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that I have placed a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Hearing in case II SUP-476 for Douglas Howard in the United States Mail postage prepaid First Class Mail, and addressed to the above stated persons, as per attached list This 19 day of August , 19 81 Bobbie Good TO: SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS SUP-476 There will be a Public Hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday September 15. 1981, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Douglas Howard FOR: Agri-Business (Horse, stock & Implement Trailers) LEGAL: part of the SE', Section 11, T5N, R65W LOCATION: 21 miles east of Greeley Your property is within 500 feet of the property on which this request has been made. For additional information contact: WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 915 10th Street - Room 342 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone - 356-4000 - Ext. 400 '-:FTD VTT OF INTEFET O N7Rc SUF=ACE ESTATE _ _caz-or_ No. S - ec ?rcperty Lot A of recorded exemption no. 0961-11-4-RE265located in the southeast quarter of section 11, township 5 north, range 65 west of th_e _ith__P.M,,Weld county, Colorado. - --____-- - — STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn , states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all surface owners within 500 feet of the property of the subject application as their names appear upon the plats or records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder ' s Office and as their most recent addresses appear in a telephone or other directory of General use in the area 'of the subject property or on the tax records of Weld County. Gam`" The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of AUGUST , 19 81 by MELANIE L. HARVEY WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires : MI Calmissien Wes k113, 195 Notary Public NAMES OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 50( ET Please print or type NAME MAILING ADDRESS Mowery, Larry & Margaret S. 27648 Weld County Road 47 1/2 Greeley Hillmann, Henry & Herta D. Rt. 4 , Bx. 182, Greeley Sanderson, Robert W. & Viola F. 3237 E. 18th St. , Greeley Connell, Donna K. 1799 Holly Avenue, Greeley City of Greeley 919 7th Street, Greeley Marcy, Dewey R. 3430 13th St. #220 Greeley Branch, Bill 3180 E. 18th St. , Greeley MAILING LIST Douglas Howard SUP-476:81:22 Larry and Margaret S. Mowery 27648 Weld County Road 471 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Henry and Herta D. Hillman Route 4 Box 182 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Robert W. and Viola F. Sanderson 3237 East 18th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Donna K. Connell 1799 Holly Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 City of Greeley 919 7th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dewey R. Marcy 3430 13th Street #220 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Bill Branch 3180 East 18th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 - ---..- U - /f` \ k \ �/ /� ''L/''\- N\•-• ,\ ` 1�i V Y' / .-� /v - .--, �� / :7. : ' . 4E \ ("------ 50 r % �- 4 -/ / . �` i 39 4E I 1 \ c�z 50 ,� ` 30 r-2:—./. ‘' aP , r:::1/4.-.' .-\ --\1 / -116 . / 15 .-- 1" . 4e ° / E>_j F o 10 J, _ U i r �� - l l lr G E �� 1:I 1_____.4.. 3° �/ -10 - e 1 - '2....#**/'....--}7/----.'" :,, (F.2( 5: Vt..' -' --.... 7/7 eil.fc:)7.------- , ��N �2 21 1 7 5/.....___rc........2„) ' C / 21 bE, ` D.TCN _ 11 3 L1 -1 / 22 i 21 22 .,-,. -, 10 23 30 i 3 21 v water I / ._____}/ I 10 — lo r� 22 1 /�� ji-10 P L 1--p + ` G 1L • / 28 1 \53t. i 3° ? 277 ). — R 26 211 :c E / C. -- -- - —.t=-=------r-=_— -- ----.-------I 10 00 i-'oo'.grid LICKS td- C Or ,tote _.,OT Gc., CGL'C '.P 5.`tk La',....., SOIL SURVEY filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. 60 percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter Lawr.I, shrubs, and trees grow well. apability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 Hs irrigated. percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam. ?—Altvan loam, I to 3 percent opes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in weli drained soil on terraces at ele ations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- rivers. Included in mapping ar small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evidence of poor draina e. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel long and narrow areas of san and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in the Typically the surface lay of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brown loam about 10 inc es thick. The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water and light yellowish brow clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes about 14 inches thick. T e substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability an available water capacity are Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effe ive rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. Surface runoff is edium, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali This soil is us d almost entirely for irrigated cro . It sacaton, switchgrass, and western w•heatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all ops commonly grown in the area, ' dud- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. ing corn, suga beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, tatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in and onions. n example of a suitable cropping s tern is 3 favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar bee s, small grain, or beans. Land I eling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, lining, a installing pipelines may be nee ed for proper sedge, and rush increase. water plication. Management of vegetation should be based on taking All ethods of irrigation are suitab but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- rigat' n is the most common. Barnyar manure and corn- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- mer ial fertilizer are needed for top ields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. indbreaks and environmental lantins of trees and Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali sacaton, tall s rubs commonly grown in the rea are generally well uited to this soil. Cultivati to control competing wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They vegetation should be contin d for as many years as can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed possible following planting. ees that are best suited and preparation usually requires more than 1 year to have good survival are R ky Mountain juniper, eastern eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. redcedar, ponderosa pine iberian elm, Russian-olive, and Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. hackberry. The shrubs est suited are skunkbush sumac, Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. lilac, Siberian peash , and American plum. The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, This soil can pro ce habitat elements that are If hly as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, suitable for openl d wildlife including pheasant, tton- where wildlife obtain much of their food and find protec- tail, and mourn' g dove. Such crops as wheat, rn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and alfalfa provid suitable habitat for openlan wildlife, openland wildlife. especially easant. Tree and shrub p] tings and Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some dlife populations. areas. This Altvan soil has fair to good p ential for urban These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from and recreational development. The ch' f limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by tures for urban development are t shrink-swell poten- livestock. They should not be drained. tial of the subsoil as it wets an dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as a source of sand and permeability of the sand and vel substratum. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. tank absorption fields function roperly, but in places the 4—Aquol and Aquepts, flooded. This nearly level substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit i in depressions in smooth pl . s and along the filter the leachate. Sewag lagoons require sealing. bottoms natural drainageways thr ghout the survey Lawns, shrubs, and trees ow well. Capability subclass area. A uolls, which have a dark c tired surface layer, Ile irrigated. make p about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which }—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This hav a lighter colored surface 1 er, make up about 25 nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains pe ent. About 20 percent is s s that are well drained of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, an soils that have sandstone shale within 48 inches of , which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface. 2(; SOIL SURVEY deposits. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that Rapid expansion of Greeley and e surrounding area have sandstone and shale within a depth of 60 inches. has resulted in urbanization of m ch of this Otero soil. Typically the surface layer is brown sandy loam about This soil has excellent potenti for urban and recrea- 10 inches thick. The underlying material a depth of 60 tiona] development. The prim limiting feature is the inches is pale brown calcareous fine sa y loam. moderately rapid permeabi. y in the substratum, which Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is causes a hazard of gro d water contamination from moderate. The effective rooting pth is 60 inches or sewage lagoons. Ther are additional costs in site more. Surface runoff is medium t rapid. and the erosion preparation because o slope. Lawns, shrubs, and trees hazard is low. grow well. Capabilit_ subclass IVe irrigated, Vie nonir- This soil is suited to li ited cropping. Intensive ri ated; Sandy Plains range site. cropping is hazardous beca e of erosion. The cropping 54 Paoli loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep, system should be limited t such close grown crops as al- well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,700 to 5,250 falfa, wheat., and barley. This soil also is suited to ir- feet. It formed in alluvial deposits. Included in mapping rigated pasture. A sui ble cropping system is 3 t.O 4 are small areas of soils that have a loamy sand surface years of alfalfa folio ed by 2 years of corn and small layer. grain and alfalfa see d with a nurse crop. Typically the surface layer is grayish brown loam and Closely spaced ntour ditches or sprinklers can be fine sandy loam about 25 inches thick. The underlying used in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows o material to a depth of 60 inches is light brownish gray sprinklers shoul be used for new crops. Applications of fine sandy loam. nitrogen and p osphorus help in maintaining good produc- Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is tion. high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. The pote ial native vegetation on this range site is Surface runoff is very slow, and the erosion hazard is low. dominated y sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It grama. eedleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- and we ern wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential mg corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, produc ion ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favors and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 ble y ars to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As range to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, con tion deteriorates, the sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Such characteristics as an switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseed, the rapidly permeable substratum slightly restrict some an sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invade the site as range condition becomes poorer. crops. Management of vegetation on this soil shoul be based All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow it on taking half and leaving half of the total an al produc- rigation is the most common. Proper irrigation water tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in p or condition. management is essential. Barnyard manure and commer- Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switch ass, sideoats cial fertilizer are needed for top yields. grama, blue grama, pubescent wheatgra , and crested Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally wheatgrass are suitable for seeding. T grass selected suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in should meet the seasonal requirements f livestock. It can establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cul- be seeded into a clean, firm sorghum ubble, or it can be tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of drilled into a firm prepared seedb . Seeding early in vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation spring has proven most successful. may be needed at the time of planting and during dry Windbreaks and environmental lantings are generally periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard in are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa establishing trees and shrubs, an be controlled by cul- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip of shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- vegetation between the ro s. Supplemental irrigation an peashrub. may be needed at the tim of planting and during dry Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The periods. Trees that are bes suited and have good survival cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked are Rocky Mountain juni r, eastern redcedar, ponderosa pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can pine, Siberian elm, Ru sian-olive, and hackberry. The be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape shrubs best suited are unkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- an peashrub. tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- Wildlife is an im rtant secondary use of this soil. ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Ring-necked pheas t, mourning dove, and many non- In areas protected from flooding, this soil has good game species can e attracted by establishing areas for potential for urban and recreational development. The nesting and esca e cover. For pheasants, undisturbed chief limiting feature is the rapid permeability in the sub- nesting cover is ssential and should be included in plans stratum, which causes a hazard of ground water con- for habitat development, especially in areas of intensive tamination from sewage lagoons. Road designs should be agriculture. modified to compensate for the moderate frost potential. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN YAKT 3 Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well Capability subclass may be needed at the ime of planting and during dry IIs irri ated. periods. Trees that ar best suited and have good survival 55—Paoli loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep. are Rocky Mountain uniper, eastern redcedar, p,nderosa well drained soil o terraces at elevations of 4,700 to 5.250 pine, Siberian elm Russian-olive, and hackbe ry. The feet. It formed i alluvial deposits. Included ' mapping shrubs best suited re skunkbush sumac, lilac, d Siberi- are small areas of soils that have a loamy s nd surface ar peashrub. layer. Wildlife is an mportant secondary use of is soil. The Typically e surface layer is grayish bro •n loam about cropland areas rovide favorable habitat f ring-necked 22 inches tick. The underlying material t a depth of 60 pheasant and ourning dove. Many nong a species can inches is ght brownish gray fine sandy 1 am. be attracted y establishing areas for ne ting and escape Perm ability is moderate. Available •ater capacity is cover. For heasants, undisturbed nesti g cover is essen- high. he effective rooting depth is 0 inches or more. tial and s ould be included in plans f habitat develop- Surf ce runoff is slow, and the erosi hazard is low. ment, esp cially in areas of intensive 'culture. is soil is used almost entirely or irrigated crops. It This . it has good potential for ur an and recreational is suited to all crops commonly gr wn in the area, includ- develo ent. The primary limitin feature is the rapid ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfa a, small grain, potatoes, perm bility in the substratum, w ich causes a hazard of and onions. An example of a sue ble cropping system is 3 grow d water contamination fro sewage lagoons. Road to 4 years of alfalfa followe by corn, corn for silage, des' s should be modified compensate for the sugar beets, small grain, or eans. Land leveling, ditch m derate frost potential. Lawn , shrubs, and trees grow lining, and installing pipelin s may be needed for proper ell. Capability subclass Ile i 'gated, IIIe nonirrigated; water application. verf1ow range site. All methods of irrigat' n are suitable, but furrow ir- 56—Renohill clay loam, to 3 percent slopes. This is rigation is the most co on. Barnyard manure and com a moderately deep, well dr ined soil on plains at eleva- mercial fertilizer are n ded for top yields. tions of 4,850 to 5,200 fee . It formed in residuum from This soil is well s ted to winter wheat, barley, d shale. Included in mappi g are small areas of soils that sorghum if it is s mer fallowed in alternate y rs. have shale deeper than 4 inches. Winter wheat is th principal crop. The predicted av rage Typically the surface ayer is grayish brown clay loam yield is 33 bushel per acre. If the crop is winte il]ed, about 9 inches thick. he subsoil is grayish brown and spring wheat ca a seeded. Generally precipitate is too pale brown clay loa about 14 inches thick. The sub- low for benefice use of fertilizer. stratum is pale bro n clay loam. Shale is at a depth of Stubble mul fanning, striperopping, and m' imum til- about 32 inches. lage are need d to control soil blowing and w er erosion. Permeability i slow. Available water capacity is Terracing a o may be needed to control wat r erosion. moderate. The e ective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. The pot ntial native vegetation is ominated by Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is western heatgrass. Blue grama, sw' chgrass, sand moderate. reedgras , big bluestem, slender wheat ass, indiangrass, This soil is suited to most of the irrigated crops corn- and gre needlegrass are also present Potential produc- monly gro in the area, but the high clay content and tion ra ges from 3,000 pounds per acr in favorable years moderate pth of the soil slightly restrict some crops. A to 2,0 pounds in unfavorable year As range condition suitable c opping system is corn, corn for silage, barley, 3 dete orates, the tall grasses deer ase, blue grama and to 4 ye s of alfalfa, and wheat. This soil is also well buff lograss increase, and forage reduction drops. Un- suited irrigated pasture. desirable weeds and annuals inva a and erosion can occur Fu ows can be used in irrigating row crops. Flooding as range condition becomes poor . from contour ditches is suitable for close grown crops and Management of vegetation o this soil should be based pas e. Production can be maintained by applying bar- on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- ny rd manure and commercial fertilizer. Keeping tillage tion. Seeding is desirable if t e range is in poor condition. t a minimum and utilizing crop residue are important. Western wheatgrass, s ' chgrass, sand reedgrass, In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, sideoats grama, pubesce t wheatgrass, intermediate arley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to wheatgrass, and blue gra are suitable for seeding. The winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 25 bushels grass selected should me the seasonal requirements of per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years livestock. It can be seede into a firm, prepared seedbed/ to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is A grass drill should be sed. Seeding early in spring has too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. proven most successful. / Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- Windbreaks and env onmental plantings are genera 7y lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. suited to this soil. Soil' blowing, the principal hazard in The potential native vegetation is dominated by establishing trees and/shrubs, can be controlled by Cul- western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strij of present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds vegetation between %the rows. Supplemental irrigation per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable )O r ATTENDANCE RECORD TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DOUGLAS HOWARD - DOCKET NO. 81-48 PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOC # (as listed above) or the applicants name of the hearing you are attending. -AME ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING 41,„*d - - 3zaZ z~ /Sri 41---"-e-t- FILE CONTAINS OVERSIZED MAP PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE Hello