The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About800039.tiff RESOLUTION RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE SITE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY FOR A WASTEWATER FACILITY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of .administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the City of Greeley, Colorado is presently in the process of developing a new wastewater treatment system to meet the future needs of the community, and WHEREAS, the regulations of the Colorado Water Quality Con- trol Commission require a hearing for a site approval before construction may be started and further, that various local and state agencies be given the opportunity to review and com- ment on the Site Application, and WHEREAS, said Site Application has been submitted to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado for its review and comment, and WHEREAS, state law does not provide for a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on a land use matter such as this one, which is presented by a public entity, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado desires to issue a "no comment" concerning said Site Application for the reason that no Special Use Permit hearing was held before the Board of County Commissioners and therefore, the Board has no basis for a determination in this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Com- missioners does hereby issue a "no comment" , for the reason stated herein, concerning the Site Application of the City of Greeley for a wastewater facility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that the Chairman of the Board be, and hereby is , authorized to sign said Site Application. PL0079 800039 The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of November, A.D. , 1980 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ;,‘,4,14 4- ,. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder 7 fiii-( / (Aye) and Clerk to the Board— C. W. Kirby, airman BY:,.1- .`, .1<4 t /1/'e� - (ABSENT) Deputy County Clerk Leonard L. Roe, Pro-Tem APPROVED-7A�TO FORM: . (Aye) gNorman Carlson County Attorney 4n4/, (Aye) L" a unbar l�'4!' '�;1 (Aye) Jt}he K. Steinmark DATE PRESENTED: NOVEMBER 17 , 1980 REE0L. T''T VELD COUNTY PLANNING C0VIESI0N Date November 5, 1980 Case No. SUP ri 445:80:35 APPLICATION OF City of Greeley ADDRESS Civic Center Complex Moved by Don Billings that the following resolution be introduced for passaoe by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of Wastewater Treatment Facilli th@nd Application the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: Treatment (see attached) be (granted) ( for the following reasons: 1. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the request is consistent with the basic goals and policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Within the Plan, it is stated that the Plan is: ". . .a direction for development based upon two fundamental determinations: (1) that agriculture has historically been and should remain as the basis for Weld County's economic and ecological well being, and (2) that urbaniza- tion can best be served by existing municipalities." In setting forth the second fundamental determination - "that urbanization can best be served by existing municipalities" - the Plan, in various instances, recognizes the need for municipalities to develop service capabilities to mcct the demands of expanded populations. For example, the Plan states: A. Page 10 - "The rapid population growth of the County can be expected to continue and even accelerate with increasing pressures for residential, commercial and industrial development. This increased population will require a corresponding increase in public facilities and services. These facilities and services can be most economically and efficiently provided • by existing municipalities which have facilities that can be readily expanded Motion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote: Abstaining For Passage Jerry Kiefer AgebootoDossegye Chuck Carlson Wilbur Wafel Bob Halleran Bette Kountz Bob Ehrlich Don Billings The Chairman declared the Resolution passed. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Dianne J. Reed , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true .. copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on November 5, 1980 and recorded in Book No. VII of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. • Dated the 7th day of November , 19 80 • Secretary Planning Commission Rec_____iendation City of Greeley - SUP-445:80:35 Page 2 for future growth." B. Page 11 - "Development around existing towns should be accompanied by corresponding development of the towns utilities and facilities." C. Page 60 - "Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality." D. Page 91 - "Since the capacity for sewage treatment is an important determinant on the growth a community can acconodate, treatment plants should be expanded and improved to accommodate the growth desired by the individual community." Finally, the Plan sets forth two basic policies which speak to the establish- ment and provision of utilities, public goods and services: A. Page 91 - Proliferation of service districts shall be opposed while consolidation of existing service districts shall be encouraged when it tends to improve the efficiency and economy of the service. B. Page 92 - Regionalization of services and facilities shall be opposed if it will lead to growth which is not compatible with the desires of of the towns involved. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the regional sewage treatment facility proposed by the City of Greeley in the current application is consistent with the basic determinations and policies set forth above as set forth by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This opinion is based on: A. The proposal sets forth a means by which the City of Greeley can meet the demands of increased populations which if located consistent with Weld County's Plan, will be located within or adjacent to Greeley's exisiting urban area; B. It appears that the proposal will not encourage the proliferation of service districts; and C. It appears that the regional nature of the facility will not lead to growth which is incompatible with the desires of the City of Greeley. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the proposed operation is in compliance with the provisions of Sections 3.3.E.2. and 3.3.E.3. of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the location, operation and maintenance of the proposed wastewater treatment facility as set forth in the Special Use Permit application and as controlled by the Development Standards attached hereto will minimize adverse impacts on surrounding uses and the area in question to the greatest extent possible. Further, it is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the current proposal provides adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, oral statements made by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. Specific concerns and/or recommendations of the Planning Commission and referral entities are addressed in the conditions for approval or the proposed Development Standards. The Planning Commissions recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: Planning Commission R emendation City of Greeley - SUP z-.5:80:35 Page 3 1. The adoption of the attached Development Standards which are designed to set certain standards for the location, operation and maintenance of the proposed wastewater treatment facility. 2. No building or electrical permits being issued on the Special Use Permit area unti the approved Development Standards have been placed on the Special Use Permit plat and said plat has been delivered to the office of the Depart- ment of Planning Services. 3. Submittal of a program which details measures to identify, monitor and mitigate potential problems with underground seepage from the facility which could result in contamination of ground water resources. This monitoring program shall be submitted for acceptance with the site plan review. 4. The natural flow capacity of Crow Creek shall be determined by the applicant prior to recordation of the Special Use Permit plat. 5. An assurance agreement as presented at the November 5, 1980 meeting be offered to all adjacent property owners. CAC/dr 11/7/80 City of Greeley • SUP-445:80:35 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1. Permitted uses on the hereon described Special Use Permit area shall be a land application wastewater treatment facility. The facilities may include a storage reservoir, aerated lagoons, center pivot sprinklers, and associated maintenance and administrative facilities. Treatment processes, structures, and facilities shall be of the type and nature described in the Special Use Permit application document titled City of Greeley, Colorado Wastewater Facilities Plan, Weld County, Colorado, Special Use Permit Application, Land Application Treatment Facility prepared by ARIX and as outlined by the application in the Plan- ning Commission hearings of October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. 2. Specific site plans showing the type, nature and location of structures for the aforementioned land application wastewater treatment facility shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits for construction of the facility to determine compliance with the hereon described standards and design concepts. 3. The facility shall be designed, maintained and operated to comply with State Health Department regulations regarding odor. 4. Landscaping plans as recommended by the Colorado Division of Wildlife shall be reviewed and approved at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 5. The Special Use Permit area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust and growth of noxious weeds. The site shall be maintained in such a manner as to present a neat and well kept appearance. 6. Lighting provided for security and night operation on the site shall be designed so that the lighting will not adversely affect surrounding property owners. Lighting shall be reviewed and approved at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 7. All phases of the wastewater treatment plant facilities and operations shall con- form with all applicable County, State and Federal Health Standards and Regulations and any other applicable rules and regulations of governmental bodies having jurisdiction on the premises. 8. Additional design criteria of the dam and reservoir shall be submitted at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 9. The applicant shall insure that the flow capacity of Crow Creek shall not be increased beyond the natural flow limits due to discharge from the wastewater treatment facility. During periods of high natural flows of Crow Creek, releases from the wastewater treatment facility shall be terminated to prevent damage to Crow Creek and downstream properties or users. 10. All design and construction shall conform to applicable local, state and national building codes. 11. All structures shall comply with the minimum setback requirements as defined in the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 12. Signs warning the public that the site is a wastewater treatment facility shall be placed on all sides of the facility where a County Road exists. All warning signs shall be of sufficient size to be read at a distance of 200 feet. 13. All accesses shall have the approval of the Weld County Engineering Department. All accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the recammendations and/or requirements of the Weld County Engineering Department. 14. The Special Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment to the Special Use Permit by the Planning Commission before such changes fran the plans and/or Development Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the Office of the Department of Planning Services, Development Standards City of Greeley - SUP-445:80:35 Page 2 15. A minimum setback of a single pivot sprinkler diameter (approximately one- half mile) shall be provided from the east side of the reservoir and treat- ment lagoons or western boundary of the Special Use Permit boundary, whichever is greatest, to the closest sprinkler. This setback shall be required, at least, during the initial phase of the land application construction which will include placement of approximately six sprinklers. Placement of the sprinklers shall be reviewed and approved at the time of specific site plan approvals as required in Development Standard #2. CAC/dr 11/7/80 City of Greeley SUP-445:80:35 COMMENTS: 1. The Colorado Division of Water Resources has, in a letter dated October 28, 1980, stated that: "it is our opinion that if the City changed its wastewater treatment facility to land application on crop land, that court approval will be necessary and that a plan for augmentation may be required. Therefore, we cannot recommend approval until the court rules on the City's application." Colorado Statute places jurisdiction over the matter in the Division of Water Resources, State Engineer's Office and Division Water Court. It is felt that consideration of factors relating to a water augmentation plan would be inappropriate in the current application. 2. To date, our office has received letters and petitions in opposition to the proposed wastewater treatment system. Copies of those items were distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the November 5, 1980 Planning Commission hearing. 3. The issues raised by the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, in its letter of October 29, 1980 are issues which, in the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff, will be dealt with by the State Health Department at the design phase and encompassed in Development Standard #7. CAC/dr 11/5/80 Date : ",...*ember 5 , 1980 CALI NU=R : SUP-445 : 80 : 35 NAME: City of Greeley REQUEST: Wastewater Treatment Facility/Land Application Treatment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All Section 5 & 6 , T5N, R63W and All Sections 15 , 21, 22 , 27 , 28 , 29, 31, 32 & 33 , R6N, R63W • LOCATION: 3 miles east of Gill, Colorado THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the request is consistent with the basic goals and policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Within the Plan . it is stated that the Plan is : " . . .a direction for development based upon two fundamental determinations : (1) that agriculture has historically been and should remain as the basis for Weld County's economic and ecological well being, and (2) that urbanization can best be served by existing municipalities. " In setting forth the second fundamental determination - "that urbanization can best be served by existing municipalities" - the Plan, in various instances, recognizes the need for municipalities to develop service capabilities to meet the demands of expanded populations. For example, the Plan states: A. Page 10 - "The rapid population growth of the county can be expected to continue and even accelerate with increasing pressures for residential , commercial and industrial development. This increased population will require a corresponding increase in public facilities and services . These facilities and services can be most economically and efficiently provided by existing municipalities which have facilities that can be readily expanded for future growth. " B. Page 11 - "Development around existing towns should be accompanied by corresponding development of the towns utilities and facilities. " C. Page 60 - "Existing municipalities are the best and most efficient sources of public goods and services which are Dept. of Planniny cervices Recommendation City of Greeley - SUP-445 : 80 : 35 Page 2 necessary to serve new residential developments. These municipalities will be encouraged to improve their ability to serve new developments within their corporate areas, in annexable areas immediately adjacent to the town and even those areas not immediately available for annexation, but within a reasonable service distance from the municipality. " D. Page 91 - "Since the capacity for sewage treatment is an important determinant on the growth a community can accommodate, treatment plants should be expanded and improved to accommodate the growth desired by the individual community. Finally, the Plan sets forth two basic policies which speak to the establishment and provision of utilities, public goods and services : A. Page 91 - Proliferation of service districts shall be opposed while consolidation of existing service districts shall be encouraged when it tends to improve the efficiency and economy of the service. B. Page 92 - Regionalization of services and facilities shall be opposed if it will lead to growth which is not compatible with the desires of the towns involved. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the regional sewage treatment facility proposed by the City of Greeley in the current application is consistent with the basic determinations and policies set forth above as set forth by the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This opinion is based on : A. The proposal sets forth a means by which the City of Greeley can meet the demands of increased populations which if located consistent with Weld County' s Plan, will be located within or adjacent to Greeley' s existing urban area; B. It appears that the proposal will not encourage the proliferation of service districts; and C. It appears that the regional nature of the facility will not lead to growth which is incompatible with the desires of the City of Greeley. Dept. of Planning Services Recommendation City of Greeley - SUP-445 : 80 : 35 Page 3 2 . It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that the proposed operation is in compliance with the provisions of Sections 3. 3 .E. 2 . and 3. 3.E. 3 . of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that the location, operation and maintenance of the proposed wastewater treatment facility as set forth in the Special Use Permit application and as controlled by the Development Standards attached hereto will minimize adverse impacts on surround- ing uses and the area in question to the greatest extent possible. Further, it is the opinion of the Staff that the current proposal provides adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, oral statements made by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. Specific concerns and/or recommendations of the Staff and referral entities are addressed in the conditions for approval or the proposed Development Standards . The Department of Planning Services Staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The adoption of the attached Development Standards which are designed to set certain standards for the location, operation and maintenance of the proposed wastewater treatment facility. 2 . No building or electrical permits being issued on the Special Use Permit area until the approved Development Standards have been placed on the Special Use Permit plat and said plat has been deliv- ered to the office of the Department of Planning Services . 3. Submittal of a program which details measures to identify, monitor and mitigate potential problems with underground seepage from the facility which could result in contamination of ground water resources. This monitoring program shall be submitted for accept- ance with the site plan review. 4. The natural flow capacity of Crow Creek shall be determined by the applicant prior to recordation of the Special Use Permit plat. 5 . The Department of Planning Services Staff feels that certain parts of the proposal must be more clearly described to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. The Staff feels those issues requiring more description are as follows: A. Underlying bedrock formations not permitting infiltration of any significant quantities of treated wastewater into lower formations which would adversely affect the surrounding areas; B. Overburden materials capability of accepting application at estimated rates; C. The proposed sprinkler application system not adversely affect- ing farm lands adjacent to the site by raising the existing and/or historical groundwater table; Dept. of Planning Services Recommendation City of Greeley - SUP-445: 80: 35 Page 4 D. Water passing through the crop root zone and not consumed by the corps being adequately recaptured by the use of interceptor drains, ditches, and wells; and E. No effect on existing legal liability of the City in the Ogilvy Ditch. In regard to A through D above, if geologic conditions are felt to have limitations or irregularities, conditions or development stan- dards should be established to define methods which may be employed to avoid such limitations or irregularities. Additional detailed investigations can be made prior to final design and recommendations derived there from can be incorporated into the "Site Plan" review. CAC/dr 11/5/80 City of Greeley SUP-445:80:35 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1. Permitted uses on the hereon described Special Use Permit area shall be a land application wastewater treatment facility. The facilities may include a storage reservoir, aerated lagoons, center pivot sprinklers, and associated maintenance and administrative facilities. Treatment processes, structures, and facilities shall be of the type and nature described in the Special Use Permit application document titled City of Greeley, Colorado Wastewater Facilities Plan, Weld County, Colorado, Special Use Permit Application, Land Application Treatment Facility prepared by ARIX and as outlined by the application ih the Plan- ning Commission hearings of October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. 2. Specific site plans showing the type, nature and location of structures for the aforementioned land application wastewater treatment facility shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits for construction of the facility to determine compliance with the hereon described standards and design concepts. 3. The facility shall be designed, maintained and operated to comply with State Health Department regulations regarding odor. 4. Landscaping plans as recomwended by the Colorado Division of Wildlife shall be reviewed and approved at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 5. The Special Use Permit area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust and growth of noxious weeds. The site shall be maintained in such a manner as to present a neat and well kept appearance. 6. Lighting provided for security and night operation on the site shall be designed so that the lighting will not adversely affect surrounding property owners. Lighting shall be reviewed and approved at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 7. All phases of the wastewater treatment plant facilities and operations shall con- form with all applicable County, State and Federal Health Standards and Regulations and any other applicable rules and regulations of governmental bodies having jurisdiction on the premises. 8. Additional design criteria of the dam and reservoir shall be submitted at the time of specific site plan approvals as set forth in Development Standard #2. 9. The applicant shall insure that the flow capacity of Crow Creek shall not be increased beyond the natural flow limits due to discharge from the wastewater treatment facility. During periods of high natural flows of Crow Creek, releases from the wastewater treatment facility shall be terminated to prevent damage to Crow Creek and downstream properties or users. 10. All design and construction shall conform to applicable local, state and national building codes. 11. All structures shall comply with the minimum setback requirements as defined in the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 12. Signs warning the public that the site is a wastewater treatment facility shall be placed on all sides of the facility where a County Road exists. All warning signs shall be of sufficient size to be read at a distance of 200 feet. 13. All accesses shall have the approval of the Weld County Engineering Department. All accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations and/or requirements of the Weld County Engineering Department. 14. The Special Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment to the Special Use Permit by the Planning Commission before such changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the Office of the Department of Planning Services. City of Greeley SUP-445:80::35 COMMENTS: 1. The Colorado Division of Water Resources has, in a letter dated October 28, 1980, stated that: "it is our opinion that if the City changed its wastewater treatment facility to land application on crop land, that court approval will be necessary and that a plan for augmentation may be required. Therefore, we cannot recommend approval until the court rules on the City's application." Colorado Statute places jurisdiction over the matter in the Division of Water Resources, State Engineer's Office and Division Water Court. It is felt that consideration of factors relating to a water augmentation plan would be inappropriate in the current application. 2. To date, our office has received letters and petitions in opposition to the proposed wastewater treatment system. Copies of those items were distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the November 5, 1980 Planning Commission hearing. 3. The issues raised by the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, in its letter of October 29, 1980 are issues which, in the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff, will be dealt with by the State Health Department at the design phase and encompassed in Development Standard #7. CAC/dr 11/5/80 " A -. - v - saIA I tor • jai •s ;fit ,�.,oa" '. `vim ,,;� " a, •.�.* F .�n.. . ,. • ..% . 1,r-*`•. _ ., •Sty GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 November 24, 1980 PHONE )303) 353-6123 Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 SUBJECT: CITY OF GREELEY WASTEWATER FACILITIES OUTFALL SEWERS SITE APPLICATION Enclosed please find an application for site approval for sewage collec- tion facilities for the City of Greeley, Colorado. Attached to the application is a location map for the proposed facilities. Please review this information and return any comments to the City of Greeley or the Water Quality Control Division no later than December 12, 1980. Please note that your signature and recommendation is required on the application form. If you have any questions or require additional information, please con- tact the City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department at 353-6123, ext. 320. Very truly yours , n C ?á . ) 7& Peter A. Morrell City Manager PAM/ld Enclosures .• r : • ' A CSNCI \�NI ` Govt "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" T t .+ _ ,.rte r 1 ttr t •;i Y iltrIllgir 4111 ofil)°A JP LIM It! it ^di 1f GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 November 24, 1980 PHONE (303) 353-6123 Weld County Planning Commission P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80631 SUBJECT: CITY OF GREELEY WASTEWATER FACILITIES OUTFALL SEWERS SITE APPLICATION Enclosed' please find an application for site approval for sewage collec- tion facilities for the City of Greeley, Colorado. Attached to the application is a location map for the proposed facilities. Please review this information and return any comments to the City of Greeley or the Water Quality Control Division no later than December 12, 1980. If you have any questions or require additional information, please con- tact the City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department at 353-6123, ext. 320. Very truly yours, - • /Z-67-e/ Peter A. Morrell City Manager PAM/ld Enclosures "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 November 11, 1980 • fiY COLORADO Mr. Peter A. Morrell City Manager Greeley Civic Center Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Site application for sewer lines and land application treatment system Dear Mr. Morrell: This letter is intended to transmit the Planning Commission's posture on the above referenced matter. On November 5, 1980 the Weld County Planning Commission granted a Special Use Permit for the Land Application Treatment System located in Sections-5 and 6, T5N, R63W and in Sections 15, 21, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 33 all in T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The Planning Commission's approval was made with certain conditions and development (performance) standards. These same conditions and standards were to be forwarded to the Water Quality Control Commission as a part of the Commission's action on the site application. These items are attached hereto and intended to be a part of the submittal to the State. If you have further questions please feel free to contact me. V- y tr ly yours, Th•mas E. Honn Zoning Administrator TEH:rjg Enclosures : :ENT C PLANN N-- PHONE 1303,355-4000 EXT :,.It 915 10Th E GREELEY,C;_DR -J:\L:_ f 5CE October 8, 1980 • COLORADO Mr. Peter A. Morrell, City Manager City of Greeley Civic Center Complex Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Request for a Special Use Permit for aLand Application Wastewater Treatment Facility on a parcel of land described as all of Sections 5 and 6, T5N, R63W and all of Sections 15, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31 32 and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Morrell: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled meetings with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980 at 1:30 p.m. These meetings will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. The October 21, 1980 meeting is provided for the City to make a presentation to the Planning Commission, to receive public comments from interested persons, and to answer any questions the Planning Commission or the public might have with respect to the City's application for the Special Use Permit. On November 5, 1980 the Planning Commission will receive the Department of Planning Services Staff's recommendation and comments on the Special Use Permit. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, 0-9MftS)2s C Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator CC:rg cc: Mr. Dick Huwa, ARIX, P.O. Box 2021, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Mr. Bill Hargett, City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department, Civic Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 i a c. egi 5 L LR: c:•,1a:e::ess S,2,and 3. n E(1a gcJ a.11:=„La th... 71 TURN TO"t2ace cn - Iel case. 1. TI._e foI'oa._E;,:Write is r:quested(:1_;,,:;one.) . ' EX 5ho 1 to 1.=:_om an!;.te de?:,-::_' a O 51:;,to c Lom,date mid cddr. :of c'_':cer,: _G Peter A. Morrell O r.E xt,L:EDEI .'•,'E.Y City u Sho7 to�l^ant:�.1 d�«_)--:. -G Complex O RES:alcn.D:':'",VERY. Greeley, Colo. _80631_80631 she:'to whom, -, --1 r_...:._i of d:'h:;.ry.S__ 2 L.iT€Ls'‘....:33EZ.7. TO s , I • '.3H ' - 1 Peter A. Morrell, City Manager c City Comples z Greeley, Colorado 80631 cn I: C= ' : to t.0. �s:-:O r-- 1 - tl _- C r - 3. 1835992 ! vim, Ft I -i - e I 1.....a ter `' '' :d" ^3cd a ...3. C S'a 4 _ L':P -70, 71c•'.1_lzz3 a rt TOTAL FIIdTAC_Aka FC=C co ` - /, • ' IS �_'�71. ` yr-1'ca .,t FOiTi"A':Y OA DATE 0.;:l.._//.,r—�"_L; :-! FC`.T"•d.A.ca.K Q _ ca " G. L�aL;::1.J;:c.Ipie±e c..- y.f requested) oo 10/8/80 r, cn L.. I�; r16. l€555A£LC TO Cr LEVE€5 C:La:.;JSE: CiE.t:R., 999 p tr:IT€AL^a 0.1 *CPO:1379-3:.:,4:,3 a e s C Neal Carpenter, A Professional Corporation President N Kent Baker 9 Eugene R Brauer Engineers Architects Planners Gordon W Bruchner Patrick C Dwyer ARIX Robert J Shreve Dale J Steichen 2021 Clubhouse Drive Robert D Thomas Post Office Box 2021 Gary R Windolph Greeley,Colorado 80631 303 330 2749 Date: October 3, 1980 Project No. 80140.00 To: Mr. Chuck Cunl i ffe Project: City of Greeley Weld County Planning Dept. Wastewater Facilities 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: We are transmitting Herewith X Under Separate Cover No. of Copies Description or Remarks 24 City of Greeley Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility Special Use Permit Application 5 City of Greeley Wastewater Facilities Plan Volume III City of Greeley Wastewater Facilities Plan Volumes I and II riNo Exceptions Taken As Requested Make Corrections Noted For Approval riAmend & Resubmit n For Your Records Special Use Permit nRejected Resubmit © Appl i cation Submittal As Indicated on Each Submittal Respectfully, 12345x. �\ na® AR IX, A Professional Corporation oo 0CT 1980 0 LSD r4j R 'CgI<VE® C62 ��, aid County By: Naming Ca tsisslr3 Dick Huwa A NA- (sr(„ " sue, ►1 W.' 11`4 ,� .. 114 I r} �. '-111 itialn" ,J �V i ti om, 14,00140, 44,0(- a 14,007— (4 Ilk err _ GREELEY CIVIC CENTER September 22, 1980 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (303) 353-6123 Board of County Commissioners Weld County P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Gentlemen: The City of Greeley is presently in the process of developing a new wastewater treatment system to meet the future needs of the community. The regulations of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission require that a Site Application be submitted to the Commission before construction can be started. The Commis- sion further requires that various local and State agencies be given the oppor- tunity to review and comment on the Site Application before they approve the request. The enclosed materials provide information relating to the entire project as well as the Site Application(s) for those parts of the system which your agency must be given the opportunity to review. The City of Greeley requests that you review this information, sign and return the Site Application(s) as soon as possible. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact me or Bill Hargett at 353-6123 as soon as possible. It is extremely important that the Site Application approval be obtained promptly in order to meet the implementa- tion schedule established for the project. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Again, if you have any questions or desire additional information, please advise us right away. Sincerely, G-4/tAlti7" Peter A. Morrell City Manager PAM/ld d "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" 1. Ogilvy Ditch - water rights 2. Crow creek - increased volume of water? effects? 3. Trapper's Trail 4. odor 5. Airborn pathogens - example of buffer zones 6. Water quality - groundwater 7. More information: a. interception ditch/reservoir b. geological conditions at site ,,, c. partially lined reservoir/reduce seepage d. underdrain system/sprinklers AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I PUBLIC NOTICE am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; that the same is a weekly newspaper NOTICE OF PUBLIC printed, in whole or in part, and published HEARING in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct public and has a general circulation therein; that hearings on October 21 1980 and said newspaper has been published November 6,1980 at 1.30 p.m. to review a request for approval of continuously and uninterruptedly in said a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility from the County of Weld for a period of more than City of Greeley on a laarcel of land described as all of Sections fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the 5 and 8, T5N, R63W and all of first publication of the annexed legal notice Se ctions 16 21 22, 27 28 29 31 32 and 33 t6N' R83V1)of the 8th or advertisement; that said newspaper has P.M. Weld County, Colorado. These public hearings to be held been admitted to the United States mails as by the Weld County Planning second-class matter under the provisions of Lion Commission for referenced the Act of March 3, 1879, or any - request will be conducted in the amendments thereof, and that said earinguRoom,First 1Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly 915 10th Street Greeley, Colo- qualified for publishing legal notices and rado. t tlhaboveb request advertisements within the meaning of the the Weshould ld County Department o laws of the State of Colorado. Planning Services, 915 10th That the annexed legal notice or advertise- Street - Room 310, Greeley, Colorado,80631 before the above ment was published in the regular and dates or presented at the public entire issue of every number of said weekly hearings on October 21,1980 and November 5, 1980. newspaper for the period of / consecu- The October 21, 1980 meeting is tive insertions; and that the first provided xpr,the City to make a presentation to the Planning publication of said notice was in the issue of Commission, to receive public said newspaper dated Dct(4, A.D. 199.., comments from interested persons, and to answer any and that the last publication of said notice questions the Planning Commis- sion or the public might have was in the issue of said newspaper dated with respect to the City's application for the Special Use , A.D. 19 Permit.On November 5,1980 the In witness whereof I have hereunto set Plan ning Commission will re- ceive the Department of Plan- my hand h1S 3) day of . ..� ning Services Staff's recom- gs�y mendations and comments on A.D. 1 the Special Use Permit Copies of the application are ava ilable ble for public inspection in Counthe Department of Planning, Wel tyCe Centennial Center�e915 Publisher 10th Street Greeley, Colorado (368.4000 - Extension,400) Chuck Carlson, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Tn he nuhlished in the .mhnA Notary Public in and for th C lnty of town Bro eezeBreezereeze Weld State of Colorado, this / day of October181i1 80 one ublication r A.D. 19.40... date ��//J,,��,, Co �gal 80-269-Planning and ��1-�`-d"` Zoning .1,23_,e),A.....x J Notary Public. My commission expires //" /DZ — PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUB=.IC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct public hearings on October 21 1980 and November 5,1980 at 1:33 p.m to review a request fora aroval of a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility from the City of Greeley on a parcel of land described as all of Sections 5 and 6, T5N, R63W aad all of Sections 18 22, 32 and '1'6N',R63W of the 6th P M Weld County, Colorado These public hearings to be held by the Weld County ?lamingCommission for the considera- tion of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, Firs' Floor, Weld County Centennia.Center, 915 10th Street Greeley, Colo- rado Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, f15 10th Street - Room 310, Greeley, Colorado 80631 before the above dates or presented at the public hearings on October 21,1980 and November 5, 1980 The October 21, 1980 meeting is provided for the City tc make a of esentatfon to the Planning Commission, to receive public comments from in'erested persons, and to answer any questions the Planning Commis- sion or the public might have with respect to the City's application for the Special Use Permit.On November 5 1980 the Planning Commission will re- ceive the Department of Plan- ning Services Staff's recom- mendations and comments on the Special Use Permit. Copies of the a plicalon are available for public inspection in the repartment of Planni"e set-,ices Room 31C, Weis, wn' Centennial Certer N.5 Street Greeley, Co: a Ito °i58 4000 - Extension 400) rnt� Ylanr�+n To ho nnhlished in the inh tov•' Breeze bo published one time +‘'er 16, 1980 Pu-licat ,egal 80 269-Planring a.,,1 .e Vl JJ\/14SJJ Li,.'' l l„S. + FLOW SHEET �1 APPLICANT: �.i\ etc y1Cse.\'!.Y CASE # ShPA4t5:b0110, REQUEST: VSlike.je wpAce Tyetx- Al ►fie1ir ;tat t / &Y4 Ne iteN...+ C�� W 1 LEGAL: * .e k. ,10 invovtveyst. LOCATION: 3 vv,.‘ `e.,S €A 1O G.\\\ � i ,rf'eta c. DATE I BY Application Received OCT 3 1980 CO‘e Application Fee - Receipt # At (ACT 3 1980 Co. Co Recording Fee ^ Application Complete 'OCT 3 �flD �1�0" _ P.C. Hearing Date : OCT 21 1990/ NOV 5 MO 0CT 8 .':0 Colk C.• • Letter to Applicant Drafted OCT ��® Referrals Listed OCT 8 1980 C..0..0i Field Check by D.P. S . Staff File Assembled I0-S -So Referrals Mailed 10 -S-BO eT Chaindexed I6-ID-Da 1 Notification of Applicant , t0 -S -$d I Surrounding Property Owners Researched 10 - \C `4-S Airphoto/Vicinity Map Preapred ,y Property Owners Notified by : ®C"T 10 1980 Agendas Mailed by: ®6T 14 1900 1c ®CT 28 1900 Legal Approved by County Attorney Referrals - Complete , MN (...i Preliminary D.P.S. Staff Comments ®V 5 Staff Conference Nflu S MO a,`''/ . D.P.S . Comments NOV 5 1980 e/6ill P.C. Hearing Action ; n 7/ - s -P P.C. Resolution (/'-7- ' D - Case Sent to Clerk to Board L C.C. Hearing _ Action : _ + 1Ch� C.C. Resolution Received 1` lD �O l�a� History Card Complete C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting Drafted on Mylar 1 — 13JU KS • Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder P.C. Minutes + l lit MI $ec G:...o ^i 5 Ix (O ,'T5� ,Qr�03W `I too atc.A is, Z41VC, 11, ZS j Zak, 31 ,3 ?lr '5%- •r.w.‘ _ Q 1.3"v 1 .iSE .� _. Svc End lb 5 - T C °to fle\.e A';N_..G :ECr_NICIAN DUTIES Map Making Process Assessor ' s Office Treasurer ' s Office for Detailed Maps Stewart Title Clerk & Recorder ' s for Special Deeds and Plats Mailing List Occasional Typing Plot Plans Leroying Soil Research Map Drafting (location, property owners) Signs Final Inking on Mylars I ( I O Filing Return Mail Other SECRETARIAL DUTIES Receipting Application & Recording Fees Assemble File o Xerox Packets for Referral Agencies Chaindex i S wwvr Type Legal Notice S vwu•-0 Type Surrounding Property Owners List and Envelopes vm-A,s,a Mail Notices 5 ytieM J Type DPS Recommendation Xerox Packets for Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners Attend Hearing Tra cribe & Type Minutes Record Plat. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION • Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 PHONE : 356-4000 Ext . 400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : Permit Fee : NA Case Number : STJP-445:80:35 Recording Fee : App . Checked by : CAC Receipt No . : TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE- MENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures . I , (we ) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Special Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use • Permit is proposed : All of Sections 5 and 6 in T5N, R63W, and all of Sections 15, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, and 33 in T6N, R63W 11 Sections x 640 = 7,040 Acres • LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AREA : e• Sim aid Same as above ' %1 A '' \ .5 V1 •_9 C_T STREET LOCATION : Weld Co. Rds. 62 and 61 (3 miles Z. of Gill) ZONE : Agricultural PROPOSED USE : Wastewater Treatment Facility • FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : NAME : See attached sheet ADDRESS : TEL : _ NAME : ADDRESS: TEL : NAME : ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all state- ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge . COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF ,COLORADO ) Signature : Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed ans sworn to before me this day of , 19_ SEAL Notary Public My commission expires : REFERRAL LIST • O APPLICANT City of Greeley - N E-+ CASE # SUP-445:80:35 REFERRALS SENT OUT ON: October 8, 1980 z U REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 24, 1980 C t-7 Pq E1 Z U U O w H Pi Cn H O U c REFERRALS RECEIVED XIMDMIDSTACtXXXiiiIWX x County Health County Engineer _ GreeleySoil Conservation Service 4302 West 9th Street Road Greeley, Colorado 80631 * Colorado Geological Survey x 1313 Sherman Street P Room 703 Denver, Colorado 80203 • * Mr. Ken Webb Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Colorado Division of Wildlife P.O, Box 2287 317 West Prospect Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 * State Engineer Division of Water Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Cache La Poudre Irrigation and Reservoir Co. No, 2 Ditch North Side Extension c/o Mr, Zack B. Wells Gill, Colorado 80624 Phillips Petroleum Company c/o Mr. Phil Hirsch P.O, Box 472 La Junta, Colorado 81050 * Volume 3 REFERRAL LI ST • v O APPLI CANT City of Greeley H CASE n SUP-445:80:35 w 'REFERRALS SENT OUT ON: October 8, 1980 CU REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: October 24, 1980 H ai tc Fi Z C) 0 0 w a 0 0 PG O F. c REFERRALS RECEIVED etnagtsratlxIMIEW Platte Valley Fire Protection District c/o Alvin Dusin P.O. Box 281 Kersey, Colorado 80644 Glaeton Area Fire Protection District P.O. Box 369 Galeton, Colorado 80622 r : ._ _ :EE ..: _, - I October 8, 1980 i �-7, QCT 9 RED© k.® CASE miN ER SUP-445:80:35 COLORADO REFERRAL TO WBOM IT MAY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from _The City of Greeley _- for a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility - The parcel of land is described as All Sections 5 & 6, T5N, R63W and all Section 15, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 3 miles east of Gill, Colorado This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any couu,nents or recouwiendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recouwiendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by October 24, 1980 so that we may give full consideration to your recouu.uendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in -this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and - find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under considerionyn be submitted to you prior to • 3. Please refer to the enclosed letter. c`�� z32 ,,3��,s g � �" Pio a I -�oSi ned �, Agency �-y N.ue.�t r' �V / riej ,w ED ; C.. . ,C-k/j Assistant oning Ainistrat ' qtr,'" -- CC:rg 10/4/80 * PHONE (3D3 25E-:DDD E,- Lr GRREELEY,COLO^-O:. E:1EE' ' j ., October 8, 1980 t�___I ; 'I ts3 . - • CASE TIBER SUP-445:80:35 COLORADO REFERRAL TO W1-10NI IT I4AY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from The City of Greeley for a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility - The parcel of land is described as All Sections 5 & 6, T5N, R63W and all Section 15, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado - The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 3 miles east of Gill, Colorado This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any couithents or recouwendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable eoe respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by October 24, 1980 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in -this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal reco.uuiendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 1``�7cU / 3. Please refer to the enclosed letter. .,�� ham- ©�A�1 Signed Agency 0)410 P � ��l �e OC 6 C.,.\ per_ 1L0'� °441.91S014*'' Assistant oning A inistrat CC:rg 10/4/80 BOARD OF HEALTH. Wed County ll eaIth Department David erking, DOS, Greeley William Slick, Roggen 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD Fran Christensen, Eaton Charles W. Juels, MD, MPH Director GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 A.M. Dominguez, Jr., JD, Greeley Annette M. Lopez, Greeley (303)353-O540 Herschel Phelps, Jr. MD, Greeley Kathleen Shaughnessy, PHN, Ault October 28, 1980 Arthur G. Watson, Platteville John M. Wheeler, Greeley TO: Chuck Cunliffe FROM: John G. Hall R- SUBJECT: City of Greeley Wastewater Treatment Facility 1. The Weld County Board of Health at its regular meeting on October 13, 1980 approved the site application for the above facility. 2. The Environmental Health Division requests a provision be made to allow the disposal of septic wastes from licensed septic tank cleaners. Tlatte Valley Sclzools WELD COUNTY, DISTRICT RE-7 GLEN M. HANSON, SUPERINTENDENT PHONE 352-6168 Kehuey, Colonado 80644 October 21, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Centennial Center Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Members of Weld County Planning Commission, The concerns stated in this letter are from the members of the Board of Education of Platte Valley School District RE-#7, Kersey, Colorado. Glen M. Hanson, Superintendent, has been approved by official board action as spokesman for our group. The concerns are expressed from our collective interests in the welfare of the school district in which we serve. Our concerns about the location of the proposed Greeley Wastewater Treatment Facility focus on several issues, namely, the effect its lo- cation at Site # 1 will have on the quality of life in the surrounding area, the effect the facility location will have on our tax base now and in the future, the concern about using highly productive agricultural land when non-productive land is available, and the fact that there is a reasonable alternative. Our concern about the quality of life in the area surrounding Site # 1 has implications with air quality, land value, and the productivity of some of the surrounding land. Past history of air quality problems of Greeley's Sewage Treatment Fa- cilities, namely the First Avenue Site and the Lone Tree Site, should be all that one would need to bring your attention to realize why the people are concerned about Site # 1 which places the facility in an area where farm homes and small rural communities would be in close proximity. The past history argument is usually countered by proponents of Site 1/ 1 who cite the tremendous capability, superiority, and national recognition of this aerobic process combined with land application. We are only reminded of a few short years ago when we heard in hearings how the anaerobic process proposed at Weld County Planning Commission Page 2 October 21, 1980 the Lone Tree Site was internationally recognized as the Cadillac of sewage treatment. We do not disagree with the capability of either system if properly operated and maintained. Our concerns are more on how the system is operated and maintained than in the type of treatment facility. We feel the location of the facility will have a negative impact on surrounding land values and the quality of life in the area. The affected area to the west and north of Site # 1 is presently highly productive farmland with higher sale value. Many farmers find it necessary to borrow operating money against the increased value of their land, that will no longer increase, but in fact, will decrease. The third concern under quality of life is the affect the excessive amounts of water applied by the sprinklers will have on the water table and the affect the sewage water will have on the quality of the underground water. Many acres of land adjacent to the proposed sprinkler site has a delicate balance in the water table. So delicate, in fact, that years of experience and dollars spent for seep tile are all that keep it in good production. If the water table problem is com- pounded by the excessive application of water and the seepage from the lagoons and reservoirs, it is almost a certainty that many acres will be declared non- productive. The water seepage and purification problem also is a great concern for the home sites in the area since underground water• is used for domestic purposes and no assurances are given that it will be fit for human consumption . It should also be noted that homes in the area with basements will have to declare their basements unusable. In a predominately agricultural county it is ironic to note the lack of concern for those valuable productive acres. The Site # 1 proposal takes 320 acres, of which 240 acres are highly productive land, out of production for the location of the treatment ponds and holding ponds as well as destroying the productive capability of numerous addtional acres because of the water table level. In addition to these items we are concerned with the future growth of the facility. We are concerned about the expansion of the facility in future years as large and small population centers tie into this regional facility. (Our concern is based on the fact that expansion would logically be to the west and north, areas high in agriculturally productive acres, since it is presently unfeasible to go to a dryland location to the east or south as proposed in Site /I 4. ) Our concern about the tax base for our s6hool district relates to the concerns expressed, that the numerous acres of presently productive land will be deemed non-productive as the water table rises. Looking into the future we are concerned about the future expansion of the facility, potentially destroying the productivity of an unknown number of acres, and taking those acres purchased by the City of Greeley off the tax roles. We realize the potential increase in value on the dryland Weld County Planning Commission Page 3 October 21, 1980 placed under the sprinklers, but we have no assurance that now or in the future that land will remain in private ownership, which it must if our school district is to benefit. The last point we would like to focus your attention on is that the City of Greeley does have a feasible alternative. That alternative is Site # 4. Site # 4 would solve concerns about the destruction of presently productive acres, would solve the concerns about water table problems and water quality problems for domestic use, would greatly reduce the air quality impact because of the remoteness of the location, would not be taking highly productive acres out of production, and would have a positive impact on the tax structure of Weld County School District RE-#7, as well as, the economy of Weld County in general. Furthermore, the impact of future growth of the facility to accomodate Greeley's growth or to provide ac- comodations as a regional facility are present, without concern for the devastating effects of Lhat growth. We realize that money is an issue of concern when considering Site # 4. It is a short range view on an issue that has long range impact. If the money concern is viewed relative to the impact not only on Greeley, but on the economy of Weld County, then the Greeley Planning Commission, The Greeley City Council, the Weld County Planning Commission, and the Weld County Commissioners, will find it necessary to select Site # 4. We want to thank you for the opportunity to express our concerns on this issue that is of great concern to the welfare of our area. In behalf of the Board of Education, Glen M. Hanson Superintendent 2Z4, GMI I/vb ,c) st5' cc: Weld County Planning Commission ©OIv�DCO Greeley Planning Commission RE.C CC) Greeley City Council Wmssine Weld County Commissioners c-.?' p►senl08 Greeley Sewer and Water Board ��O`58 L 9 91c° CITY Op Iris 3700 GOLDEN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 59 EVANS, COLORADO 80620 EVANS FOUNDED 1969 HOME RULE 1973 ,' November 4, 1980 CpLORp90 Mr. Chuck Carlson, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Application Request Wastewater Treatment Plant - City of Greeley Dear Mr. Carlson: As you are aware, the City of Greeley is presently seeking approval from the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission and the Environmental Pro- tection Agency for the construction and operation of a new wastewater treatment plant to be located approximately three (3) miles east of Gill . In reviewing the proposal , including certain assurances from the City of Greeley concerning the environmental impact that the proposed facility may have on adjacent properties, the crop-application system appears to be both economically and environmentally feasible. The City of Evans, therefore, wishes to recommend that Weld County, as well as other agencies involved in the application process, grant approval of Greeley's crop-application wastewater treatment system proposal. THE CITY OF EVANS Gerald D. Hettinger MayorA4 2 2/ 4/___ ' /Ver/ GDH:km cc: Weld County Planning Commissioners �� (2,),\ Weld County Commissioners O 1080 s,tot \k office of the city manager 356-6313 police department 352 2441 office of the city clerk 356-6770 s `�• .�' v -�aHw:.r ?."tea:- 14'��. $ • 4 1 1 ► '�. „ "�"� i ' ►iii;, t « . r ;x., Ft , ' 1M-,, •-. • v \••• _•. "its' �' r � � 163 GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 October 30, 1980 PHONE (303) 353-6123 Mr. Tom Honn Zoning Administrator Weld County Planning Department P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Tom: During our meeting on Monday, October 27, several items were discussed con- cerning the Greeley Wastewater Project. We are providing the following additional information regarding these questions for your use in developing the staff recommendation to the Planning Commission on November 5. Effect of Discharges to Crow Creek We have conducted field inspections and surveys along those portions of Crow Creek for which we could obtain permission to enter. Based upon our analysis , it appears that Crow Creek can adequately carry additional flows of at least 30 CFS without causing any problems. In discussing the flow conditions of Crow Creek with long-time area residents , we have learned that up to 50 CFS of ditch water is sometimes wasted into Crow Creek from the North Side extension ditch at a point on the east edge of Section 17, T6N, R63W. Apparently, no damage is caused by such releases. Av- erage releases from the wastewater facility would be significantly less than 50 CFS, more in the range of 15-20 CFS. During periods of high natural flows , releases from the wastewater facility can be terminated to prevent damage from occurring. Trappers Trail Cultural Resource Inventories have been undertaken by Gordon and Kranzush, Inc. in accordance with the requirements set forth by EPA and the CHS. Phase II work conducted by this firm and as reported in Volume II of the Wastewater Facility Plan, Appendix I , pp 10-11, identifies Trappers Trail (Cherokee Trail ) "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" Mr. Tom Honn October 30, 1980 Page Two as being located within the project area. Quoting from this report, "Though historically significant in terms of exploration and settlement of Colorado, the CHS-DHP considers development in this corridor to have adverse impact to these sites only if construction affects physical remains of the routes (stage stations , campsites , etc. ) . " As of this time, no such remains have been iden- tified. Any cultural resources which are discovered during design and con- struction of the project will be preserved in accordance with the regulations established by both State and Federal agencies. Odor Comparisons have been repeatedly made between the proposed facility and the Lone Tree Plant. The Lone Tree facility is an anaerobic treatment process (without air) whereas the proposed facility is an aerobic facility. Anaerobic facilities are odor producing and when operated without enclosures will produce strong odors. Aerobic systems operate with very little odor and are not offensive. Numerous people have visited the Muskegon facility to assess odor and other aesthetic factors. While it is not possible from a scientific point of view to quantify such conditions, most individuals visiting this project have not found it to be offensive to the senses in any way. Airborne Pathogens Numerous studies have been completed analyzing the health effects resulting from aerosol dispersal from waste treatment facilities . No scientific evidence has been discovered from previous studies which identifies any adverse health effects in areas adjacent to wastewater treatment facilities . Water Quality - Groundwater The major concern regarding groundwater quality is for the concentration of nitrates. The U. S. Public Health Service recommends that the nitrate concen- tration should not exceed 10 mg/1 in public water supplies. Calculations indi- cate that the average concentration of nitrate in leaching water will be approx- imately 7 mg/1 , which is below the maximum recommended allowable amount. Further, it is planned to recover this water and not allow it to permanently enter any existing aquifier. A complete discussion of water quality issues can be found in Volume I of the Facility Plan. Interception Ditch/Reservoir Concern has been expressed that the proposed interceptor ditch will take water from the North Lateral Irrigation Ditch. The entire area proposed for irriga- tion lies at a much higher elevation than the North Lateral Ditch, making it physically impossible to capture any water from this facility. Mr. Tom Honn October 30, 1980 Page Three Final design of the reservoir has not been completed; consequently, the selec- tion of the ultimate method of seepage control has not been made. Several engineering methods are available for seepage loss control , including reservoir lining, physical barriers , and hydraulic barriers created by interceptor wells or ditches. The final decision regarding the method of control will be made during the design phase and will be based upon cost and reliability factors. Geological Conditions at Site All existing geological information has been included within the Facility Plan. Should you have specific questions not covered by this material , feel free to contact Barbara Turner (825-8464) for additional information. Partially Lined Reservoir/Reduce Seepage As previously stated, final design of the reservoir facility has not been com- pleted. Consideration will be given to all available methods of control with the final selection based upon cost and reliability. Underdrain System/Sprinklers The underdrain system will consist of an underground network of perforated pipes designed to capture most all of the water percolating below the crop root zone. It has been suggested that systems of this type do not function success- fully in many cases. Normally, systems of this type are installed to alleviate severe natural drainage problems caused by high groundwater, tight soils , etc.-- conditions which are not well suited to drainage by any method. Site 1 was selected because soil conditions are uniform and well suited for recapture of the treated wastewater by the method proposed. Any comparison of what is being proposed to performance reliability of systems constructed to alleviate naturally occurring poor drainage conditions is not a valid comparison. Should you desire any additional information before the November 5 meeting, please feel free to call . Very truly yours, C. William Hargett, Jr. , P.E. Di rector Water and Sewer Department CWH/l d . 2g293f13 7 NV l 70 al �' 1VEZ) ono o;) �� Ito, 6��119`5ttiti,sg'�� Al2 _ - , i PM - ilia -4i err' -•= ; I 11548.4. .r V SO > �" �� m Illiti # 4 y �II— Imo„ ��i. .;�♦ �f." ".�;' *U °` `s - ,: --' «�G' �• a, �� ,i//��` ..+C ';ate. . i t /a. •, ♦ R ,;� GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 PHONE (303) 353-6123 October 2 , 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Court House 919 - 10th Street Greeley, Colorado Dear Commission Members : Pursuant to discussions between the Weld County Attorney ' s Office, the Law Department of the City of Greeley, and the 201 Project team, the City of Greeley submits the attached application for a Special Use Permit . As you will note from the information contained therein, the City does not currently own the property required for the construction of this treat- ment facility. Therefore, we are requesting that this applica- tion be approved conditioned upon the acquisition of that property, through purchase or condemnation, prior to construction of the project . This type of request is necessitated by conflicts in local regulations and federal funding requirements . The Environmental Protection Agency will not approve and release any funds for the purchase of land to be used in this project until all local requirements are met . One of those requirements for the Step III Grant is the Special Use Permit for which we are now applying . If we must acquire the subject property to obtain the Permit , the Federal Government will not reimburse the City for any of those expenditures . Therefore, we request the issuance of a Special Use Permit with the condition that we obtain a legal interest in the property prior to commencing work on the project . This will enable us to obtain necessary funds for purchase from the E. P .A. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter . Very my yo s , LO czy 00 ®CT 19 0 ti p�y � City Attor ey �' �,yY� O® N 6D j k c� wstt��A let `c-'_> -' 'l��% "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" C Neal Carpenter,President A Professional Corporation N Kent Baker Eugene R Brauer - Engineers Architects Planners Gordon W Bruchner ARIX Patrick C Dwyer Robert J Shreve Dale J Steichen - 2021 Clubhouse Drive Robert D Thomas Gary R.W ndolph Post Office Box 2021 Greeley,Co'orado 80631 303 330 2749 October 3, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Chuck: SUBJECT: CITY OF GREELEY LAND APPLICATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY PROJECT NO. 80140.00 The two contact names for referral agencies as requested are as follows: Cache La Poudre Irrigation & Reservoir Co. No. 2 Ditch North Side Extension Mr. Jack B. Wells Gill , Colorado 80624 Phillips Petroleum Company Mr. Phil Hirsch Post Office Box 472 LaJunta, Colorado 81050 Please contact us if you need any other information. Respectfully, ARIX, A Professional Corporation Dick Huwa DH/pt � LO „ ®cr1980 ��'1Ve® 8 c•-.1 81C1c-> s cV I I BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO,DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS • Planning Commission Page 4 October 14, 1980 I ka After further discussion, Commissioner Miller made a motion to amend the previous motion to indicate that improving the streets `' should be done with an Improvement District instead of through the development process. Commissioner Cummins seconded the motion. Vote i K was taken and the amendment to the original motion was carried unanimously. A roll call vote was then taken on the entire motion. Commissioner Cummins - Nay; Commissioner Roeth - Aye; Commissioner Miller - Aye; Commissioner Dietz - Nay; Commissioner Keirnes - Aye. The motion carried 3 to 2. V. WELD COUNTY REFERRAL: LAND APPLICATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY LOCATION: Three miles east of Gill Ken McWilliams indicated that the Planning staff is supporting the proposed Site 1, three miles east of Gill. He then turned the meeting over to Bill Hargett, the City's Public Works Director, for a more detailed explanation of the proposal. Gary Windolph, Vice-President of ARIX (the firm retained to design the plant) gave some background on the project. He explained that the planning for the project started in 1972 with the initial selection of sites. It was decided in 1976 to build a mechanical treatment plant in the Delta. This was approved by the State Health Department and-the EPA. The City then moved into the design of the facilities at the Delta site and found the cost had increased to about three times the original estimates due to time delays in obtaining all the required approvals. The City then decided to analyze alternative sites and treatment methods. After evaluating everything, the City reached the decision that a land application system should be constructed at Site 1. Mr. Windolph illustrated Site 1 chosen by the City for the plant and explained that the second alternative was to collect all the sewage and bring it to the Delta site for treatment. The County did approve a Special Use Permit for a complete sewage treatment plant at this site should that be the City's decision. However, the plans now call for only a pump facility at this site. The County "g would now like for the City to amend the Special Use Permit to show 1 what will be done at the Delta site. It is now proposed that through the use of pressure lines, the sewage will be brought from the Delta out to the Gill location (Site 1) for further treatment. Bill Hargett presented slides of the proposed Gill site showing the I i natural rise of the land and explained why the site was superior to the others studied. The slide presentation included shots of the Muskegon, Michigan, sewage treatment facility which is the same type being proposed for Greeley. After the slide presentation, the Commission entered into a lengthy discussion regarding the pros and cons of Site 1 versus the other sites studied. Bill Hargett indicated that the Water Rights Manage- ment is greatly simplified at Site 1. He also indicated that should ' Site 1 not be chosen, then the Delta site would be the alternative I location. Commissioner Miller questioned why Site 4 had been dropped ' as an alternative. Mr. Hargett indicated that it was because of the Water Management costs. Gary Windolph explained that Water Rights I Management does not simply relate to the physical aspects but also to ' the concept of change in use and whether or not the City is selecting I I the reasonable method for treating their wastewater. At Site 1, the water can go almost directly back into Crow Creek. However, in order I I' A • I BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO.DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS , Planning Commission Page 5 October 14, 1980 I q ++I to return the water flow above the headgates at Site 4, it will cost I about 2.5 or 3 million dollars more than at Site 1. In addition, there is the problem of the Ogilvy ditch and the fact that the City might have some contractural liability to continue to provide water to that • j ditch which could be as much as 3,000 acre feet per year. To provide this water to the ditch, it would be somewhat expensive from Site 1, but it would be almost impossible from Site 4. The cost for this could be between 9 and 11 million dollars. Another reason for the elimination of Site 4 is that the Federal Government's laws and regulations require that the most cost efficient system be selected. In this case, the land application system and Site 1 meet this criteria and Site 4 does not. The issue boils down to whether Site 1 is environmentally acceptable and there are no conditions that make it unacceptable. 0 Commissioner Cummins asked what the depth of the overburden is. Mr. Windolph indicated that it varies in places from 30 to 40 feet with most of the site being 10 to 20 feet, Chairman Dietz asked if there was only one farm that must be removed for the storage reservoir. Mr. Windolph indicated that there was only one, Chairman Dietz then asked for any comments from the audience. Mr. Jack Larson, a farmer in the area and president of the Concerned Citizen's Committee, spoke on behalf of the residents in the vicinity of Site 1. Mr. Larson explained that the citizens were not opposed to the Land Application theory, but were opposed to the site. He indicated that some of the main concerns are the damage to underground water in quali y and quantity, effect of the sewage treatment facility on surrounding land values, and air quality and odor control. Mr. Larson explained each of these concerns in great detail. He indicated that 1/2 section of good irrigated land was going to be totally covered by the reservoir. He also noted that some of the surrounding farmers are at a slightly lower elevation than the proposed site for the resevoir. The citizens are especially concerned about their farms being flooded out with seepage from the reservoir or that the wastewater application system will raise the ground water level substantially and damage their crops with too much moisture. Or, there is the possibility that the plant will be pumping so much water that it will lower the level of water in their ditch. He further indicated that the farmers in the area did not have much confidence in the collection ditches for the run-off water. He explained that this method had been tried in the past and it has never been able to capture 700% of the run-off. The residents are concerned about the portion of the run-off water that escapes and that it might contaminate their water should it come out onto their land. Mr. Larson then restated the four major concerns of the residents of the Site 1 area: 1) Too much water or taking away water; 2) Con- taminating water; 3) Air quality and odor control; and 4) Effect on property values. I Mr. Larson then explained why the citizens felt that Site 4 would be better for the plant. Some of those reasons included: 1) nearest neighbor is three miles away; 2) only need 3x miles more of pipe II to reach the Ogilvy ditch than is needed from Site 1; and 3) the ' cost to the City to purchase dryland at Site 4 versus irrigated land ;I at Site 1. He stated that the citizens felt that the additional 9 I to 11 million dollars to build the plant at Site 4 is minimal in Ii comparison to the dollars that would be lost if the irrigated land i is damaged. • It II i (I I I • i � D BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO DENVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I ` 1 y Planning Commission Page 6 October 14, 1980 Mr. Vic Wolfe of the Concerned Citizen's Committee also spoke on I a behalf of the residents. He reiterated the arguments of Mr. Larson, I E commenting that he lived only 1/2 mile from the proposed site and was concerned with the fact that some of the land proposed for the • i �► reservoir rises 30 feet higher than the flat valley surrounding it. Commissioner Keirnes asked if their Committee had not been working up some guidelines to present to the City that would be acceptable to the land owners and if they would continue to oppose the site selection if they were given certain assurances that were reasonable in providing protection to them in regard to any possible damage to their property. Mr. Larson indicated that the Witwer Ranch had drawn up some assurances that- apparently were not agreeable to the City. He personally was not in favor of any type of contractural agreements because once the damage was done, it could not be reversed; once the money was spent and the sewage plant installed, it cannot be taken out; what the farmer defines as damage may not be what the City describes as damage; and finally, why take the chance when there is another site available? Commissioner Keirnes indicated that he and the Commission could sympathize with the feelings of the farmers, but they had to rely on what the engineers had presented to them and take their assurances that no damage would result to the surrounding land. What the whole argument comes down to is an emotional issue and the Planning Commission must be concerned with the long range planning of the City. Bill Hargett indicated that an additional $173,000 of State assistance was spent to check into the concerns of the farmers as Mr, Larson had outlined. From this addditional study, the engineers were confident that Site 1 was the best possible site and no damage would occur to the surrounding land. He further indicated that Site 4 was not even the second alternative so the arguments in favor of this site were really not necessary. Should the City decide against Site 1, the complete plant will be built at the Delta site. Commissioner Keirnes asked the engineers to give an estimate of how much this delay was costing per day. Mr. Hargett estimated the delay is costing a total of 8100,000 per week. Commissioner Miller questioned how long the proposed system would satisfy the sewage treatment needs of Greeley. Mr. Windolph indicated that it depends on future growth. The plant is designed to handle sewage for 120 to 140 thousand residents. He further indicated that the projected time frame for the City to reach this size is about 20 years from now. Mr. Bill Crosier, representing the Greeley Board of Realtors, asked if anyone knew what the difference was to purchase the irrigated land at Site 1 versus the dryland at Site 4. Mr. Windolph indicated that Site 1 land acquisition-costs would be about 1.35 million dollars as compared to $850,000 for Site 4. However, Site 4 would be the more expensive of the two sites for the completed plant because of the additional preparation the land would require. After some additional discussion regarding the two sites, Chairman Dietz called for a motion. Commissioner Keirnes indicated that he could understand the concerns of the citizens and he would hope that they could work something out with the City through some type of contractural agreement. He then made a motion to recommend to the Weld County Planning Commission that they have no objections to Site 1, three miles east of Gill, for the Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility. Commissioner Cummins seconded the motion. Vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously with Commissioner Roeth abstaining. 1 A of co<o ti RICHARD D. LAMM H� J.A. DANIELSON Governor State Engineer - T N. * */876 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver,Colorado 80203 Administration(303)839-3581 Ground Water(303)839-3587 October 28, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: City of Greeley Special Use Permit Case No. SUP-445:80:35 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: We have reviewed the City's application for special use. It is our opinion that if the City changed its wastewater treatment facility to land application on crop land, that court approval will be necessary and that a plan for augmentation may be required. Therefore, we cannot recommend approval until the court rules on the City's application. Very truly yours , itz . Hal D. Simpson, P.E. Chief, Water Management Branch HDS/GDV:mvf cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. Reiner Haubold Land Use Comm. 74,0 Rsc tVEO tcv� inning • •or C°lo COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Richard D.Lamm Ne Nvr YS Frank A.Traylor, M.D Governor 1876 Executive Director October 29, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: The Water Quality Control Division, General Services Section has completed a review of the Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility proposed for the City of Greeley. The Section has no objection to the issuance of a special use permit. The following comments should be addressed during the design phase: 1.) The pond and lagoons may require lining to prevent any impact on the surrounding ground water. Drawings of the proposed interceptor trench are necessary to ascertain whether the trench would be able to fully contain the see- page from the pond and/or lagoons. 2.) No monitoring wells were indicated on any of the drawings enclosed. It is necessary to know where these wells are to be located and their depths before any recommendations can be made as to their adequacy. 3.) From a containment stand point, it appears that the under- drains are inadequate. It would seem that the underdrains or interceptor trenchs, used to contain seepage, should be placed around the outside edge of the entire area instead of being located as indicated on the enclosed drawings. The thinking on this is that when the land application system is operated, it will cause ground water mounding to occur around the system, particularly around the southern edges of sections 10 and 11. When this happens, the ground water flow regime will be reversed for a short distance, and spreading will occur. Because of this potential for spreading, the placement of the catchment system is all importment. This is especially true because of the proposed rate of application in conjunction with the evaporation rate experienced in this area. Also, the potentiometric map (Figure 4, page III-6, Volume III) indicates flow to the southwest. 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE DENVER,COLORADO 80220 PHONE (303) 320-8333 ) J It will be necessary to have a detailed crossection of the underdrains or interceptor trenches, indicating their exact dimensions. Also, it would be necessary to know the effluent amount and discharge location. 4.) Another concern is that this system not be used in conjunc- tion with any industry that might discharge heavy metals or exotic organics/inorganics. If this is to be the case, then possibly a pretreatment may be needed at the industrial site. 5. ) An additional suggestion is that a geologic soil description, similar to ones found on drilling logs, instead of the engi- neering soil classification be utilized when discussing soil strata at the site. Further analysis of the soil characteris- tics for prolonged irrigation should include the following: (1) Cation exchange capacity (2) pH (3) Calcium Carbonate (4) Particle size distribution (5) Total organic carbon (6) Total organic nitrogen (7) Exchangeable Ca, Mg, K and Na (8) Total soluble salts and Chloride - of interest to irrigator (9) Bulk Density 6.) Proper operation of a land application system requires a mandatory maintenance schedule. This schedule should be addressed to avoid serious problem. It is hoped that these comments will be of assistance to you in your review of the proposed wastewater treatment facility. Since ly, 4WW:5?-i-<%;ir"/". Thomas L. Bennett Planner General Services Section WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION .`L'.�� '2-34 Sea° TLB/dkg bti� �O APP m O RICHARD D LAMM * rv� * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR **�u�1n,r * Director 1870 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303)839.2611 October 23, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Cunliffe: RE: SUP444:00:34 SUP445:80:35 GREELEY WASTE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY PLAN WELD COUNTY We have reviewed the applications for the above referenced project. The Bedrock Geology Investigation by ESA Geotechnical Consultants and the Geotechnical Investigation by Empire Laboratories , Inc. (for the Waste Water Land Application) provide very adequate information on the geo- technical considerations of this project. If their recommendations for additional definition of conditions for design of the dam and reservoir are followed, we have no objection to approval of Application SUP-445:80:35. We have reviewed the Primary Geotechnical Investigation for the Delta site plant. As the CH2M Hill report indicates, additional investigation is needed to determine the behavior of the subsurface when loaded by a foundation. The seasonally high groundwater table may also make construction difficult. These conditions, among others, should be taken into account in a more detailed soils and foundation investigation. If these recommendations and those in the above referenced reports are followed, we have no objection to approval of these applications. Sincerely, ulia E. Turney Engineering Geologist JET/gp •z'i4b7.62'/ _ C" cc: LUCtle co Rapp. Ca°un�„ r C GEOLOGY ��. \,� STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE 4:‘el1101,6� STATE OF COLORADO Richard D.Lamm,Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES `°VOL'lb pig,-.0O. DIVISION OF WILDLIFE o , Jack R. Grleb, Director Northeast Regional Office 3'' ,j1�44 6060 Broadway 317 West Prospect -4'0F`� Denver, Colorado 80216 (825-1192) Fort Collins, CO 80526 October 21, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe e Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Chuck: The Wastewater Facilities Plan has been reviewed and appears to be a reasonably conceived plan. It is suggested that shrub and tree plantings be made above the high water line on the proposed impoundment. This should enhance both the aesthetic and wildlife values. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Sincerely, Dona Bogart Env onmental Biologist DB/jsk 5i -3 oc'j r Li-i •�4, CS- 11:9. i`•; , i O1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Monte Pascoe,Executive Director •WILDLIFE COMMISSION,Wilbur Redden,Chairman Donald Fernandez,Vice Chairman •James Smith,Secretary •Jean K.Tool,Member •Vernon C.Williams,Member Michael Higbee,Member • Sam Caudill,Member • Richard Divelbiss,Member - "----- n 1221 eighth avenue greeley, colorado 80631 303-356-7700 II.5O cik) c'ri,° '1fl°°fl„ \ Realtors November 3, 1980 Mr. Peter Morrell, Manager City of Greeley 919 7th Street Greeley, Co. 80631 Subject: Proposed Greeley Sewage Treatment Plant, Site 1 Dear Mr. Morrell: In 1979 I was appointed to the Citizens Advisory Commission for Greeley's 201 Project to review, along with other Weld County residents, alternative sites to the previously proposed Delta Site. For many reasons it had been determined that the Delta Site proposal was no longer workable. Our Commission heard numerous presentations from consultants retained by the City of Greeley as to the merits and demerits of the various site and treatment options. It is my opinion that the site identified simply as Site Number 1, located in near proximity to Gill, Colorado, offers the best opportunity for the proposed treatment facility when all factors are considered. This opinion becomes especially valid if Greeley can, as proposed by Mayor Hall, provide fair and binding indemnification to adjacent land owners whose property may be adversely impacted by construction and operation on the subject site. Sincerely, ff .C ars RDS:v 7(cir5e) ti NOV 1980 ( RECEIVED N Wl County cam---' PistAsg Go(7ID9asio (.5% 4 residential, investment & commercial sales, property management, and development %,, k * 11:6461411 fgo'A $40 Pi • -ar ---,es;o 1r .t 1,_ # i� .. � mgr __._. } �..d .-. •ti 1 �Ja�_ w� r �••� l�d „'w : 4 i'T %'�,.,.w.te�".,' - t GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 PHONE (303) 353-6123 November 5, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Honorable Members of the Planning Commission : As a member of the Citizens' Advisory Board for the 201 Plan for the City of Greeley, I have reviewed all of the technical data as to the various alternatives for sewage treatment as well as site location. There was a tremendous amount of technical data supplied that supported that the land application treatment long term would be the most cost effective process and that Site 1 would be the most efficient location for such a treatment facility . There were many questions raised by the members of the Advisory Board similar to the questions that are being raised for the Planning Commission . I feel that all of these questions have been answered through additional technical studies, and I strongly recommend that the County Planning Commission approve Site 1 as the site for the wastewater treatment facility. Sincerely, �S m Sasaki Community Development Director ,_ SS: yip (1,0-)6;5: 7_8,970 �� 78970 � 01980 � lomuti .9c ,��main "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" G C2ee IZO2k�� November 5, 1980 Water Quality Control Commission: I am writing this letter to express my opinion on the proposed sewer site #4. If this site is not chosen, I am worried that the City will be forced into creating a sewer moratorium on sewer taps. As a Realtor in Greeley, I can forsee a very serious problem in the housing industry if this should happen. I feel that with a moratorium on sewer taps the price of homes will be falsly inflated and therefore damage the real estate indust- ry along with all the support business directly or indirectly connected. We cannot afford to spend more time and money to locate another site. We must choose this site now. Thank you, /6 Donald R. Moll, G.R.I. Broker Associate DRM/sh cal�� 1 ( GYl ,y slt] C� Cam, �1,� tl }, B� �1 Via, �r's . \V DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3564000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 O • COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct public hearings on October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility from the City of Greeley on a parcel of land described as all of Sections 5 and 6, T5N, R63W and all of Sections15., 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado. These public hearings to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Cen- tennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street - Room 310, Greeley, Colorado 80631 before the above dates or presented at the public hearings on October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. The October 21, 1980 meeting is provided for the City to make a presentation to the Planning Commission, to receive public comments from interested persons, and to answer any questions the Planning Commission or the public might have with respect to the City's application for the Special Use Permit. On November 5, 1980 the Planning Commission will receive the Department of Planning Services Staff's recommendations and comments on the Special Use Permit. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Depart- ment of Planning Services, Room 310, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado (356-4000 - Extension 400) . Chuck Carlson, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Johnstown Breeze To be published one time by October 16, 1980 - Publication date Received by: Date: CC:rg - r: r = l 1 _ 4 EE , F i C*4.21 _ E _ rte COLORADO The Weld County Planning Commis=ion will conduct public hearings on October 21 , 1980 and November 5, 1980 at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Land Application Wastewater Treat^ent Facility from the City of Greeley on a parcel of land described as all of Sections 5 and 6, T5N, R63W and all of Sections 15., 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado. These public hearings to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Cen- tennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Dcpartr;ent of Planning Services, 915 10th Street - Room 310, Greeley, Colorado 80631 before the above dates or presented at the public hearings on October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. The October 21, 1980 meeting is provided for the City to make a presentation to the Planning Commission, to receive public comments from interested persons, and to answer any questions the Planning Commission or the public might have with respect to the City's application for the Special Use Permit . On November 5, 1980 the Planning Commission will receive the Department of Planning Services Staff's recommendations and comments on the Special Use Permit. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Depart- ment of Planning Services, Room 310, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado (356-4000 - Extension 400) . Chuck Carlson, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the Johnstown Breeze To be published one time by October 16, 1980 - Publication date Received by: Date: /O /b_ CC:rg DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3564000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 October 9, 1980 • SUP-445:80:35 COLORADO To Whom it May Concern: You are receiving a copy of this notification because your name appears as a surrounding property owner owning surface property within 500 feet of the property under consideration. The Weld County Planning Commission will review a request from the City of Greeley for a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility on property described as follows: All of Sections 5 and 6, T5N, R63W and All of Sections 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, and 33, T6N, R63W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this applica- tion has been submitted is: Approximately 3 miles east of Gill, Colorado. The meetings of the Weld County Planning Commission are scheduled for October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. These meetings will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado at 1:30 p.m. The October 21, 1980 meeting is provided for the City to make a pre- sentation to the Planning Commission, to receive public comments from interested persons, and to answer any questions the Planning Commission or the public might have with respect to the City's application for the Special Use Permit. On November 5, 1980 the Planning Commission will receive the Department of Planning Services Staff's recommendations and comments on the Special Use Permit. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above dates or presented at the Public hearings on October 21, 1980 and November 5, 1980. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 310, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the Department of Planning Services at 356-4000 - Extention 400. Respectfully, C9NV.C91.4wC kiN0QAE.0. Chuck Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator CC;rg 4h s� OCT 1980 �, RECEIVED t„..+ wall two • _ e l • s 1 e - • �_CJ�• / ,0X i:!3 ,^ t;'), - i -i , 1 ;}n .J) " OJ ', I. i-, ')" - - -- i- `°k i ' f- - 1 . ,, :�,) • - 1 L -• , l'. - - _L - PS 7 -,'. - ,, _ -) , , , ' I ')l, 1C 1 . l J '- i ,ll ' i , z, -, , r r o, l _ ( r' 1 -) ' 1 / _ )' ( - ' - 1 (. , c '1-) 1 ), -' -1 - , 1 -_ 'r - , I,_ - i y �I• :I i _l T I' 1 1" )I ''''''H r. r. , 'Lc, - i , ° 1 1 - 1-` _ , ) J ,/' ' .• '' illl _ ' -' ) '-.7F4 r . J. - 'J' , ' 1 - ' ,1' - 'fJ • . . - L ', a ' -a,a I o f_ '... j r5 • ')'_ 1 ''t•',( .025 .': e 77,e'--- co ray, OCT 1980 `v? RECEIVED �k, wee Count? 5,,' �, Pinning Cc>e>R ,v X16,9Z9.9Vc„I OCTlbaa ,�. 3g 74 f)?/1 / 4 RecE1V ED rial,ag tnmmissioh g e, 6 ( � ti 68L951V C,_-1 # O /9E0 'Veld e&-t6-11-1i- -.- :- )ee-e-11:1-7--- e-e1-71- -i-C-Z--14--d.- -y-u — ® 4' L7� . - e__Q_ J ee)--g-e-. 8d 6 .r / pcb-,-- / (!--t -i- z_0')--<._) ; 4 Z- ,... Cc, . 7- _V--,A- 2,- ._,›..e4)__ ,y,', . d-e-i-e,'-2,7e, ! i(i?.---&,e__e-- .. ,. . cer'.1,=. .. , i/M--e:,- z. , /z -- ' ---() ---,6 ----- 2--z-,L-. - 4--Y-- ��e _),,,,ie..,, ,,.., , / :i- ._... ._-.<2_. _,, .... _ ."--cf - ----1-vc- ---e2 e. r.S2 i --ee- 2-1-es.-7-z-/ --e_,- --; ---4---4-ez-Ze___- ---/- 2--W , _ /--/--i}-sit2 ---a., /, _ - *--7-"" jriffiZo__ f zte A3-i�21 c`2et-e -L- /q5? v Corn Pf) N 15o ,S ► -rE s / TE IV rOpograpi : Sprink/efS ,o ,6e oi-r S 'lamrirrkLems pir.airie ,6i//s ,3o/ciAov� i` /a9ooh c i fkaitie of , ed9;1 5 .6rmS /77 &?ryl62,5 - 2 a y oars n S c y-�A:7 c I/93 v;//e F/6,-/s " (vaiiey) ,/;//S vahia /eti . dra//I 4e5 eek %`a (A fa/IC-he 1 `.epor7Ls Mere 7Lh is YC.'deG , Za5ooh "210 /S oT C31//sib/ac E? ��je Ali/lei- c<m //- &-E' 4 uJS e ge acres . G e o ) o9 /51-s 6Oi'e z-eii 71h Sha/e 140;745 40; A .shy/& 4I 7L1%J�J /Lt /y2� e 5 //v zz) 71/)/,‘ /g /1)Che5 ®/ie p/Gees, agooh //y ' i SQ 11.! CS C';/, - !'?, )n 46)q 1-e-/_,5 C /"e'io Or'eek (.7c-retSS .74 17‘) z e/15 D-F li oii ,/Oens;71l•J on fY'l/YIe- �?Kin land Jac k �'G/ � i�S c e. e J 40/772i r 2 n7;. tae//vs On -le/op JaC'c7 2S1 � � (c D� .S l2'i�C�GI c°'_ ,Di,$yc�QSC!� S/�'u Yl kS J �� ' K'G? f / e. - e sides s ob , ) P6141-l': OJ orovs* _ 4o r o�� r, u .sue yr - y3 people. , Q_A0 DV e /n -I-h e- Va• /ley L.v er e G�,� — L �� • te r 'i�.lZ -ems-�' % �3Cz'_ (e -i/d-'2.) �/ 4 L7U ,4& 1-- .-Ate-Iii IL (Pek.&- 44 ;,'&d; �d' .(/'-e'6 ,-2 <--- /./Ltd - ,,LtA-,-- - 6t-g-ee,i_ ( 1/-ex,e.r/t--ez/(--e/z- / ��v Cu 4/ 1 1 . d°a( lc.2 ' a,,c-e- "12,1„? ,,,,,,A-c-4--p---z, 4:-.6-d-- .7i-i ,;/L J-eL,,__ ' G-'z /4-/-COQ -1-e:/-t- z. G'- ,e — ra4;741_e_."• A� i,i�,, gr� c 0c1198° won cr, Wai um c3' �' .vc� :::::: , ti NATIONAL A55OCIATION OF REALTORS® ,sh Greeley Board of Realtors, Inc. 1024 9th Avenue,Suite 1,Greeley,Colorado 80631 REALTOR ® Telephone 303 353-8884 November 5, 1980 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Planning Commission Centennial Center Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: The Directors of the Greeley Board of Realtors wish to urge all local , state and federal agencies to give favorable consideration to the application of the City of Greeley to construct a waste- water treatment land application system at Site #1 , located ap- proximately three miles east of Gill , Colorado. Although we earlier were in favor of Site #4, our over-riding preference now is Site #1 because we know that something must be done as soon as possible! Sincerely, ( `) Carol J. Campbell , President GREELEY BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. CJC:esw 7.`i �" NOV 1980 j RECEIVED w V!c'd Gou tJ Z REALTOR®—is a registered mark which identifies a professional in real estate who subscribes to a strict Code of Ethics as a member of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS. NELSON ENGINEERS GREELEY NATIONAL PLAZA 822 7TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 (303)356-6362 November 5 , 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Complex Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: This letter is submitted as an endorsement of the waste water treatment system as proposed by the City of Greeley, Colorado to be constructed at the Site #1 east of the City. I have been briefed on the specific plans as developed to this time . After careful consideration of those plans and weighing the many factors which have been discussed in meetings regarding this subject , I believe that the proposed system constructed at Site #1 is the most logical solution to development of a sound waste water treatment program to meet our needs . It is indeed unfortunate that our City has been unable to arrive at a satisfactory solution for this much needed facility in over eight years of study. However, further study is absolutely no longer necessary. The entire community must now support and insist upon development of this prudent plan. Respectfully, (20 ,1A44C:. 17C) LaVern C. Nelson Registered Professional Engineer LCN: jlp j 1p "o 0 Q., NOV 1980 SS RECEIVED KW County �cI Ram*� IBS"� Warren E. fitchell 1943 26th Avenue Court Greeley, CO 80631 November 4, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Dear Sirs : I strongly urge your affirmative vote in favor of the waste water treatment land application at Site 1 for the city of Greeley. Excuse the pun, but "stagnation" is the negative vote. Stagnation of Greeley, Weld County, taxes, etc. We need Site 1 for practicality, economics and the future. Please have foresight like the founders of Greeley did over 100 years ago. Water made this county a great place to live. An affirmative vote for Site 1 will cause our future to be as great as the present. Sincerely, > , / I - , /. NOV 1980 • ry ,(I RECEIVED will gum A '. �}��ninr Cotmissiol J> NORTON, UNDERWOOD AND LAMB ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 1020 28TH AVENUE SUITE 205 GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 303 -351-0550 November 3 , 1980 Weld County Planning Commission P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: RE: CITY OF GREELEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROGRAM We wish to offer our wholehearted support for approval of the proposed land disposal treatment program of the City of Greeley, Colorado. We have reviewed the various reports and exhibits prepared by the City consultants . Based on that review, it is our opinion that the combined works represents one of the most thorough studies ever done in the State of Colorado . Expert input has been obtained from environmentalists , agronomists , geologists , facilities engineers, lawyers , water rights engineers , hydrologists, and others . Obviously, no expense has been spared in soliciting involvement from all needed experts . It appears that all conceivable problem areas have been adequately addressed. If any further delays are encountered before proceeding with the proposed improvements , it is quite likely that the enforcement division of the Health Department would impose very rigid tap restrictions , or conceivably a total moratorium on the Greeley system. Such action would be devastating in terms of impact on the already poor condition of the area' s economy. Weld County Commissioners Page 2 November 3, 1980 We have, of course, been appraised of objections by local property owners . It is our opinion that these objections are based primarily on the natural resistance to being located near a treatment facility. There appears to be no valid reason to believe that adjoining landowners will be negatively impacted. Sincerely, NORTON, UNDERWOOD AND LAMB Yjl',C(L THOMAS E. NORTON, P.E. GEORC M" DN ERWOO P .E . ICHARD D. B, P .E. GMU:jc j c � ,Js�o 7p /<\`?.- ,S) . NOV 1980 a " EcErVED R ��zzoz 910 27TH AVENUE P.O. BOX 548 MIMI GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 303-352-3706 November 5, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Greeley CO 80631 Subject: City of Greeley Waste-Water Treatment Program Gentlemen: I am writing to express my support of the current City of Greeley waste-water treatment program. I have read various newspaper articles, reviewed written data prepared by the City and their consultants, attended a public presentation and talked to various City officials about the program. Based on this information, it is my opinion that the Site No. 1 recommended by the consultants and by the City officials should be approved by all entities involved as soon as possible. It is my understanding that any further delays on this very important project could result in severe restrictions being placed on the City by the Health Department. Such restrictions would be detrimental to the normal growth of the City and cause considerable hardship on many citizens. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MINER AND MINER, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 v Charles W. Meyers, P.E. �23 5 67,Q President /_v G, ' N 0V 1980 CWM:bc = � RECEIVED .is z, C'L i�oG!i1 MINER AND MINER, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Branc ' , c. ,;r',,• �,�; Mlf -rj o r 8 WELDING SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT CO. P.O. BOX 1705 1700 1ST AVE. GREELEY, CO.80632 PH. (303) 353-5224 DENVER,CO. PH. (303) 825-7386 November 3, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Commission Members: The City of Greeley has spent countless hours and dollars in preparing for a new wastewater treatment plant. The time has come for someone to make the difficult decision of accepting their recommendation. No one wants to live near a wastewater facility, however I believe the City has selected the proper site. Site No. 1 meets the planning for environmental, social and economical acceptance. I'm asking that this commission not let this matter drag on any longer. We need action and we need it now. Please make a favorable decision for the City of Greeley and all it's residents. Sincerely yours, Dale L. Majors DIM/1p ,\G 1}':i O,)_ NOV is8o f �, RECEIVED ' 7 c ) 'e2Lrleg eO�.a!'�:s3i,3 vp' C November 5, 1980 Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box CC Greeley, Colorado 80632 I ' ve taken some time to get informed concerning our wastewater treatment controversy. Through the attend- ing of meetings, reading reports and material written and direct conversation with some of those people close to the project, it seems to me that site 1 as proposed by the City of Greeley is the most cost ef- fective and appropriate alternative . I support this project and I would like for the citizens of Greeley to make this commitment so that our area can conti e to prosper and be a viable community. . ewayne Krause ,z-o?/\,5 6,c) IOU 1980 ;'c= RE��,IVED `� Clad Csrni� Eaceins eoILy:ES.Z1 2111 21 Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 November 5 , 1980 County Planning Commission Room 310 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Members : I have attended the City ' s presentation of their pro- posal for solving the potential crisis in Greeley surround- ing the disposal of sewer in an acceptable manner. I was not , as I 'm sure many others are not , aware of the gravity of the present treatment plant controversy. As a property owner and a person very concerned about Greeley ' s future, I join my neighbors and colleagues in the community in urging you to approve Site One as the location for Greeley' s new sewer treatment plant . Sincerely, R. Bruce Garrison RBG/cmn 3t�507r N0V 1980 ocJ RECEIVE® Z, c— Yield Co¢M ti Planning Commlzs �-', ceelegZO I r-7 REMY CO. r COLORADO, WYOMING, MONTANA, and NEBRASKA TELEPHONE (303) 352-1212 1212 8th AVENUE GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 1, November 5, 1980 County Planning Commission Weld County Centennial Complex Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: This letter is to express my concern and wholehearted support of Site #1 being selected for the construction of our waste water treatment facility. I have attended several meetings and in considering the problems and the consequences of Site #1 not being selected, it appears that for the benefit of both the City and County, Site ##1 should be approved by all governing bodies. I, and tne 22 associates at Scott Realty Co. respectfully request your recommendation to tne Commissioners of approval of Site #1 for Greeley's waste water facility. Therefore, I respectfully request that you gave your immediate approval to Site #1 for the Greeley waste water treatment facility. Sincerely, SCOTT REALTY CO. Ernest B. Scott Broker EBS/bb �� 76 � '9j rt.' NOV 1980 C, RECEIVE "el �� ;�!�Ceuat1 I I REALTY CO. p r s COLORADO, WYOMING, M IsNTANA, and NEBRASKA ,, ,;1;,f•. ,. TELEPHONE (303) 352-1212 v ' qv , 1212 8th AVENUE GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 November 4 , 1980 Dear Mayor Hall and City Council Members, Please accept this letter as an expression of my concern and wholehearted support relating to Site # 1 being selected for the construction of our waste water treatment facility. As a member of the Real Estate profession , implications re- garding the consequences of Site #1 not being selected are over- whelming not only to me but to the entire business community. All phases of quality economic development throughout the area stand to be significantly devastated if there is a delay in the selection of the site and construction of the new facility. We must continue to provide our citizens with new, viable employ- ment opportunities and residences in which to raise our families . Placing into service the facility at Site #1 contributes to attaining the afore-mentioned goals. Your deepest concern regarding my comments is most appreciated . Rspe 't/#// ly J% ✓0 Doug Mitchell Scott Realty. (4-3.r-67. -76. � . `�` NOV 1y8O j f� ' RECEIVED c @dR'. Gount� z �� n Pi ing CONI jean 1. schober &2-eae - ' 6,,,,,.7j,,,,n;;LZ )4e-A-t-e"-Pe, £v d 1 Yi O'''.-- --.--'- y TA _ ` Q -,./Z1 /�.1?7, -,-_r --,--,-, ✓ -c C' _,j ` - 2 1.-c--" -- C,+ 'C-re< _ x_ a ,ICi k.,;-• k C.t.'Gr_,�L 4:.=�ij �= "---� �-��'--cN____/; i ;,,z..,-„,,, ,£' /-..:"-e �C.-'-.. , C.G2!---..-',..e -X-{--LC-.`'!'r' ---1.'1i--Y` , -„e":! ---e ✓.'_ ,-e'-2%C__e r e/ C c'' ,1-4,-'7 ./ ''-' fie= ‘.„../..,:_e__ je!_,c,e---,-,,L.,e;--7-x e<1_, ":1_,-,-- <,._--e--,<:-.- _.„--,;,,,---- _, 2_, `6/764 -- -+�,'z---. .G. `.=-~e-- ;,' '�- '''- ,X-, t ,e` 3,,i 9�`� s e'` 7e:'—_lei,/ (-- j"e- < !!--‹c--e.rlf Gc:_..ZZ'C`J y-, _J �'4 51 ,$ '� g NOV 1980 i RECEIVE® / / c_� �l C_ �C��`fj VW County z ,y ' + Eni Caissine c lien v C7 & C, November 4, 1980 Weld County Commissioners Weld County Planning Commission Centennial Complex Greeley, Colorado Dear Weld County Officials: As an interested Weld County resident, and member of the Greeley City Council formed Wastewater Treatment Advisory Council I encourage you to support Site #1 for the Land Application Treatment Facility. I understand the concern of residents of the proposed site. This issue however touches the lives of all Weld County residents and your decision must be made based on the facts, and the determination of what is the best quality of life for the greatest number of people. In weighing the facts and evaluating the differences between Site #1, and Site #4, I feel that you must choose the better alternative which is Site #1. If Site #4 were selected the financial expenditure and loss of 8,000 acre feet of water from the Ogilvy ditch would have the greatest impact on the citizens of Weld County. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, - - C- Vicki J. Ericson Member Wastewater Treatment Advisory Council g567� Nov 1980 RECEW Et. (73 f"" Vita COM ?ate$Eoe�isa� ti T. C STANDER. JR , D.D.S SUITE 301 HESTED BUILDING 724 8TH STREET GREELEY COLORADO 80631 303-353-2340 /Vv v. 4, /980 L)earz S2aii; have .J,tudl.ec� .the i.J.Jzce4 concerzni ng ,the p zopo,Jed .&zea,Lmen,E 4L,Ee.J, and £mmedi.a to nece.J.JL4 o C,ee.Lecf i, 4Jewerc need4J. ?eel f/La t .JLfe #1 Li ,the mo.J.t .logical. and eitilLcLen.t, and ,that L f can handle owl_ 1zaturze g,zow.th Piz a veaj .Long 3 aam ae -the dedica-tion .fhaf OWL ,Leadeic,J have .Jhvun in. .thebz. exhau4,ti.ve ae4earzch on ,Eh i4 L.J.Jue. %hef .Jhvwtd be commended on ,Ehe.i.rz egorz t4 and .Jhown grza Ee zcL a��rceci uvnvrz /zei rc Mme. Si-te #1 i Ln content w i. oua common 4, and .9 lorz one gave i..E m} ?tail .Juppv2t. %. C. s-tanderz, /VS 234567 4. 8 c® NOV 1980 co RECEIVED W c Weld County Manning Commission ceeeteoZb\p' Weld County Planning Commission: I wish to express a deep sincere concern of the effects that I feel will be caused if land application on Site #1 is your de- cision. Not knowing how much information you have received, I will attempt to touch lightly on some of the major issues that are very important to us. We are very concerned with odor which we have been assured would not be a problem but with the human error and malfunction of equipment, which we all know is bound to happen, we feel sure there will be odor at least intermittently. To enforce this con- cern one of the first questions asked at our first advisory com- mittee meeting on October 30, 1979 was how the land treatment site was chosen and the reply was, "remoteness tor odor control, uniform soils, cost of land, and water rights." This reply indeed falsi- fies their assurance that there will not be any odor. Next consideration is the devaluation ot properties around the lagoon. While fully appreciating the problem of waste disposal that the city of Greeley is facing and not being opposed to new inovations ot sewage treatment or new iuethodo ot any kind I do not believe it is fair to expect property owners in the area to suffer a financial loss of any kind. Although being assured once again that this will not happen, one onLy needs to ask himself his choice in purchasing property close to a sewage treatment facility or property that is not and the answer is self explana- tory as to the drop in value. Next point ot concern is the underground water table. The seepage from the lagoon and reservoirs and the water perculated through the soil through crop application will indeed change the Page 2 quality and quantity of the underground water. The engineers call the layer of rock "bedrock" but in layman's terms we know it is shale and that it is not solid but has millions of tiny cracks which would prevent their recapturing 100% of the water that perculates through the soil. We happen to v talking about an area that has a very intri- cate balance in the water table. Much more so than in any area I know of. There used to be bogg holes, swampy areas and small ponds until irrigation wells lowered the water table enough that crop growth is possible on 100% of available land. Any adding to or taking from this underground water table would be most critical for we have experienced years when the irrigation wells will surgelonce again reminding us of the intricacy of our under- ground water. Many of the homes use this water for household and livestock use. The high nitrate count present in the water they will be applying to crops, I 'm sure, will make this no longer possible. The engineers have told us that if this becomes a pro- blem they can drill test holes to monitor the water level and in- stall pumps to control it. Considering this remedy, we are once again faced with the problem of malfunction of equipment and dedi- cation of employees that plagues us all today. However, I do not believe that this can be done with any great degree of success. If Site #4 and land application would be your choice, all of the above mentioned problems would no longerna problem. There is no one living close to this area. There is not any irrigated land to damage by a raise in the water table, as a matter of fact rage 3 I believe escaping water from the system in this area would indeed be an asset to the extremely dry grasslands. There would be added costs for the extra distance and earth work. This would be off- set somewhat by the purchase of expensive irrigated land, pumping stations, extra pipe for recapturing the uncierdrain which are necessary for Site #1. Now, these items will not cover the aaded cost that Sitt #4 demands but if you consider the problems of the Lone Tree site, t'ae fact that you are putting city wastes in rural people ' s back yard, the per capita cost over the years the system will be operating, the added cost of Site #4 becomes quite insig- nificant which, indeed, makes this the wisest choice for waste disposal. 1 \L-4-7/' LA 9 /ZAS2_,, af,c4le-)•-kj OCT 998® , RECEIVED 6' rJ Wild Conti Phialgtostssin 'Z991' • r./d ' d '!'A a,. w /. t.".;e:''. ,L-1--,-;--,e-/ .../, . , ,„ a ! _ _L '' /' /! i Y L e, OCT 19B0 - ReCE1VED Cr) Vail tout) &Wi!Coasisslai - - 649E9911'' -- `- --Jalig,L4 , 9 gt3-? yrz-Lsmdr-e--• ' 4.) - / 4Lti,xY ?'45---- 24)4. ZU--4--11 e-,L-6, 12 -: 4:-/G. ee_g..) &A-LAIL, ,67,,,., rf,__.L7b, ,)1 :}41. :7j-a) 6z-fx_ge_. s0e -y 6-L) C A_e ae__) Oft-e-e-ei' /64.,2- ,d_a_1. 12, -,n6-e16.4._. }6—ac-te_iti.L., _e_at_44- 7t . � 61_4& - a e,,,,,,,,z C • I...,i,„„)., .:„ 21' ;fit v - „Z ,c.C) , _ e cfA, al,,,, a.),,.. 7 ,6 , ai.....,( ..&:,,,, ,C...r,, aiL. Gem - Lw>, t+yL Le.A.4,,„( 2 c?0,-e-it-L _A-e--C--4-4,O Ch_./ 614-a-,/61-4t-t_. S4 OCT 1980 ' RECEIVED e- N ��li 6oariy ! i�oa�{ssfn c 417:4g--f", �" � '� e • 49 15 - dede ‘tY-el (--eC)2-77-L) ,e;e c,„ / gi-7-4-cA0 e- 1 , ' a-va_ 6.,4(A) r � 7.)atuz, el/ 02--tz,l) v6/ 12._ eis OCT 1980 r; RECEIVED coati Piantag Od \ 61eZ95'�C'Z f/ ,•Z) 4/-a42CLe2 '13 7-?-"Ce^-,1 -Z-H3 6')C') e-ri -i j)-. C?,',,Y2.-- -e,41./..4--0 Vii'• 1' ,,e"/"Z• ..d-- G-L� _257�`! -.__ - ?4,,?-45-vx-A -v.lo � - G- -2 -,1 ?1-S-v 2.--171,,j.L1-4-• / ��- -,- - -dd. &-a-'" .‘.") ,-2'1:-:,_,--,- _-, .. ::,,e-a- ept.. —4/....._ �GY�J / CV Ci-'Y1.,.,,i-,-.4-L 64--) ....,.„.__.d) cit7t--7I--7-2-0-.2 ,•‘.-• €.--1--,- - --, I cZ. .,c,•-.141,-1 -"licj2-• ‘. :5 673"- -"--el"\I '''-' 47-7 ---- --. /,-L,‘/-R-- ///t-- e„4,4,. ,.._ 64J-J_Looerl,7_,,,,),_.,. CO-`. /77 7 , # :Ylle."* ��Va-7 y> /Z"Ll C-.. �/isK...c»,^s.-4- Cam jp'l./ -• his+ �iQ ..2 (211-.. .-- J 1,.." -e-tila---21 ...,.e .C"-1-.47,_, d)„.cAi-e.-7-r 019+' ex,_,...___, ..e_i_o_ �Q/.�2� --6,--.--4,-1 ,,-.ci e-e Ca ./J il.-� �VJ-e� ./ ••,-r, c74/1.-p-.--6-',1 rte+ -.ti.--e® e)/[9.-, ji (2 _.._.. r ,,(V,-4-e .,-1-_-_,,. .7-1,..a,.,,- __7_,_.,,:_„ e. ...aL„,_,,.., .;?" ---e--; v c7..a ,ii/ 2.Y;,ey-.....,-...---_, .O ._.. -,-.7, e,-‘2 A.--,,,--u., , illy .•4/ ..," - am C% ! , C.? :...40 ,,a,._,..,,,,.:,-,..,_,_._ . ,,,10 ,fe- e__•:11 /� eln i L-1 i-rte?. ./c•..,,,z4 ,�-J //,�//iC� ..�^^ r,�i /� re-A-- --t,--1..."2 67-2.2-,:y -iv- -ex-- c-**1--:,..oce. (.,--O4a ..,-, .— (,/z/l^!.lam _4 , ,:x..Q_1 /n/__ 1..-._, ..t/J'C_, / 7°'i/.1 ._,GX,_‹-.— ._4.....-,....A... ..i.....)......Z.,--,,07., -g..- ..,,, -. 4)-.), --"Xe-- .-ert.-4., .-_, .,./-,L-c2.-21-.cA-e _a- .--°eL;-t- ca --.---1/v../ -v%-# ,.... .I'L.d.-....,. c.12 ,4 1 4*-'7-w--c__, _,..c:*,w,s ca- e_-4--ert°-1 .<,‹.-1-.W.--s,.---12 / - 14 D rte*/J/.1 o J jg).,,, _il,„ ,_1.4./4..,'.'1 ...-/L. e,e ,,,g212-- -4.,,--,-c-, •-•- -i<-4-A-- 1 6 /1 cj-t-1- 1--) / 1j -�'�-L- --I:7-7- _.(2. Ce✓u�c^ CD E-3-'✓,-7, .G'�-- -,.. ,,arms-,-c.,-"D--v—r___ �d%�f KsVr lld 4'YfJ�vC/. ��+�J�7 ��''E:�.l ^.�*--c✓ �9+ r G'L' C�tr.� G..� C' .-y �Z G CL- - • cam` j )4J-4L-1 0-0,/ OCT 1980 c RECEIVED October 2.9, 1980 '_7eld County Planning Comm: Greeley, Colo. Dear Sirs: Platte Valley Grange No. 455, situated in the town of Kersey, Colorado , and with a membership of approximately 75 persons, wishes to go on record as being opposed to the number one sight for the waste water treatment plant east of Gill, Colo. and would favor the number four sight. The Grange , being an agricultural organization, feels that land which will produce food should be preserved for that use. Grange Paster : _- ,C.-E_ Z.--/ Zi:1,,,tilj;l, Joe Brantner t, Nov 1980 .,, R CEivED v mod 42, viloommida • November 5 , 1980 Route 1, Box 24 Gill, Colorado Weld County Planning Commision Department of Planning Services Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: In regard to a request from the City of Greeley for a Land Application Wastewater Treatment Facility on our property, we feel this request should be denied . Our plans on this farm cannot be carried out if this request is approved. Sincerley, Shirley L. Xiller �7a co'b� Py ,er. v41O1- c&, November 3,1980 Weld County Planning Commission Box 758 Greeley, Colo 80631 I am writing to you to voice my strong support of the City of Greeley Water Treatment Facility, at Site 7 1. I am thoroughly convinced that Site tiL-1 should be approved as the most desireable alternative both for the future growth of the City of Greeley and Weld County, and as the most cost efficient choice. E.L. ,14 ar Store Nana, r Montgomery Ward & Co. Greeley Mall 4 6 Greeley, Colo. %`'3 8 4460 NOV 1980 a RECEIVED 2-7, wa+ead�ri plaest r#11atrilet RICHARD A. BOETTCHER Box 1728 Greeley, Colorado 80631 November 5, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Service Center Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: It is very important to the residents of Weld County and in particular those Weld County residents living in and near the Greeley area, that a new waste water disposal system be constructed. The Greeley City Council and Greeley Water Board have approved an area East of Greeley known as Site 1. This site has been studied and is the best possible site due to cost effectiveness and numerous water augumentation problems. I urge you to support the City of Greeley in approving Site I. Sincerely, g;20.,,,„.0‘.0" Richard A. Boettcher RAB/ada 2� �$� 1 RECEIVED Wald County Penning Cocsmissioa HOME SC`� �� BUSINESS 1922 26th Avenue �,��++ � 1428 7th Avenue 352 7944 ceeeie06% 352 5000 1007 9th AVENUE-P.O.BOX 627 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 303/356-1401 November 5, 1980 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Greeley, CO Dear Members of the Commission: I want to express my support for Site Number 1 for Greeley► s proposed sewage treatment facility. I have attended the majority of the meetings and briefings on the sewage facility and based on the information presented I believe Site Number 1 is the sensible and logical choice. In all of the meetings I have not heard any testimony from the opposition that was based on fact. Please base your decision on the scientific facts presented for Site Number 1 and not on the unsupported and unwarranted fears of the opposition. The city believes that their facts are sound and are backed up with written assurances that the farms will not be harmed or devalued. I believe this is reasonable and all that the opposition can expect. For the continued growth and prosperity of Greeley and Weld County please approve Site Number 1 . Sincerel Ys Z .. v. John Yer ng, D.V.M. \23456) Nov 1980 o Jo Lc) Well Coati FlarcimP 1E! AGRI TECH ASSOCIATES Consultants in Agriculture Technical Services 5800 West 24th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Wednesday, November 5, 1980 Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce 1407 8th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Gentlemen: I am writing as an individual representing my own opinion only. The subject of this epistle concerns the selection of a site for the new City of Greeley wastewater treatment facility. Having personally reviewed information made available to me through the media, by the mayor's office and at public meetings, I am persuaded that one site is most logically suited for this vitally needed facility. The location I endorse and support is Site #1. Y rs very tr , r. Geor e R. Co ger GRC:dm 234561 NOV 1980 N � co RECEIVED —,, Weil County Fiaooieg Commissin® c"eele06 - Please pr) nt or ype NAME ilA1L ; NG ADDRESS Jackson B. Well s A, Bruce & Jackson B. l!e 1 1 s Gill , Colorado 80624 1313 Sherman Ste. 620 State Board of Land Commissioners Denver, Colorado 80203 Rt. 1 box 152 S.L.W. Ranch Greeley,Colorado 80631 Vera Peterson Rt. 1 Box 39 Kersey, Colorado 80644 William & Dorothy Walker 34380 Weld .C.e, fld. 67 Rt. l Box 51A Colorado 80624 72 Broad Street Elizabeth Armstrong c/o Mrs. Hu h Dunn Guilford, Conn. 06437 — C. Millard Bashor t. 1 Box +3 Gill , Colorado 80621+ NE of Gill Duane G. Bashor Gill , Colorado 80624 Jackson B. Wells A. Bruce Wells c/o Jackson B. Wells Gill , Colorado 80624 P.O. Box 2143 Ethyl Margaret Nesbitt Bullhead City, Arizona 86430 • Julia M. Cook Rt. 1 Gill , Colorado 80624 Altena & Julia M. Cook Rt. 1 Gil l , Colorado 806-'2! Carroll & Arlene Bishop 32138 Weld Co. Rd. 68 Gill , Colorado 80624 602 S. 2nd Street Frank J. & Maria B. Granado • • Kersey, Colorado 80641 Theodore L. Nieman 222!, S. Ogden Street — Denver, Colorado 80210 Jackson B. & 'Lillian M. Wells • Gill , Colorado 80621+ Fairmeadows Land Co. Box 836 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Lee A. &�lorma J. Miller Rt. 1 Box 21 —— Gill , Colorado 806211 Rt. 1 Box 24 Jacob, Jr. & Shirley L. Miller I Gill , Colorado 80624 David E. Bates c/o C. Millard Bashor Rt. 1 Box 43 Gill , Colorado 80631 I „ ..I .1_' I , , ' f, • 'I- 1, .. ' ti,(; i . 1 ; . 11 . , l'.. ) 4J „ t; I , 0 1 ,, 1 " ' .. ' _I, , „ , :-1,t- C; •C1' U. . J.11 • ' . VU 1-'' I 1 ;1, , ,toi, t,,, ' 'ii ' t I' L ' r L'” II ,' „ (I1 t t ' f' - 1.1' yIVI i I L. , 11', ' r , .,,' `1 I r t' I'Il1,r-'t' ro " ,I ti. .I_i L, ., ,i',11rtLlL •_ _l.i (; , 7-It)' I1. 5"l; „ I ' ' 1. _L r .1r'C,1r• ,' •r1'n',,1r'.1: -r'II 0, ,: 1(' _I.:1!' , _ ' Ltl_ I t" •)C]1' I' t'I, 1'I. -,, :11• U . 411. cam!6 ,..:.5)6" :.-.219- 2. , ,. - ..../2(..?�l t/, �C.C. !' .�:r...--cci....,-<" \,(,,, ✓,` 77 , />o8. J a r_--2,21.-: j '74:‘,/, _) ,2//‘ - 4 a.„ se - 9_,,,g... / i1 , � IC' ;1 "2 a ' t1 (2, trJ, s4. k,;--,z.c_ , ' ,s(,' 6( (7` / /,) J'11r12t_. fit- '"?''u--- �J i ,7 �i.l%� Ca'r2er., ; X57 1 C/ �i j ./�o- ,.5-7 GI; L. r.)/. r�L .LAim/y • elatgi...) v1 .J/77 l� GCE 56' f )`'� <(. ��"� 1 1 :.-4)rid r-4.- _-1c-..G1,-;;;,..e._ . 1;7 f75-'7/ Al, ,,, 3 3 l/ (" '/1 l'/ /� 0 , .PLI,Ul/ ;, ''‘. AZ-4'6- _et" _, `---C,211-5 /i/f ez-vcyt--,ez., /ce•-0,,e. , , a ,„,,,._) 4 ,-c-1�E— YZA-7-7,_ C , CO \L012 t,c- f G rwclz a �? S W C �t�1�,_ ! _,D,C'. rY I OCT 1980 M RECEIVED co Ile hl Cnar;¢ Flannis;Weak" 95ti ,ray tJ I , i ' .i i' - ' i_"( 1 I•, ' . I .)' C.L 1 1 1 •, ; I •, , I , -. Ili' I_ I }'I' 1_ , 1 , ' I ;rl , i c)1'•, - , i, I , ' :i ,r,c_,'r, -1:'n I ip'I. V%11.1" '( I_:I .I , I1.1 t: L. ' ' 11 )' , t]'. l ' ' ; - ,i +1'1 I Lt l•, da-an '' .11.' ti-,_11L, , (1:1 '1 , y a'` , .[1Lr->i .1 .`1' 2"'' 'I:' -, Ii. , l' ' .11.1 -7 all ' 'Inn rild t,', H ! ')'L]. ' . :3L;t[1L.1• J_ I -I ' I.,, , t,.1-; pro-+ [ I (:, ' r I„i(' land L- ,r)r i' Lii" tt1:c:. . LOA al, '1'/,i7L''''lje--- /g)V ‘ 741. 4611 Kr(41/ 0) ..cr. - /.5 3 - 5 ;G—if Z (JPs _6/2, , ,, ,Q6i-6, E 27 'C' /1//}7 Ci i:cr. �,l'� � 1 , ��- 77'----c�,� „ ,/�ZP r_�•�/' 6_47- _.) ________ , to, , . (----- cid 6 _ - 3,,7 ii'Co-S „.e..e,ije--, a , ---iii,E6, c zcA <3 q Ace- K O c-A- (--) c, spe__, , • - rs V ill o / d ? Cho t- -�- `-- Cain - / _/1A-'‘.7/ . ,,,___ _.. "N,4(irj-' --"SQ----------'- - - --- /• I r) (A ) 6, IL.- 71-0- - (12 4- e_LyG 9 p , /1/61-------7' /� /(, (!(1-/ `A • ei.V-ie1-2< /- // ,...7"- / ----/ 5 ..,- g r1,762 ( ) ,; , i , - 4? ulcui / CL7,0 .. p .. () / /,�� , %I) , _122? - ,---:7-7-,C 7 t,-, T 980 A401- `� c�,u . � /0./g1X / �" i// ',RAe,‘,-,---, ,,.,.4 dilIPP-'3, ea ., - �'�� / ^vim. FlatInita !g .u' / ,-, 1, / /. /. C-1- - �() 0 o„a t' I l '1' 1 'I' I c ) N We, the undersirnied, do protest .ind object fo the location of the sewer treatment and Lind application plan prnponed for ;site No. 1 on Section ;i1, u. (i;3 W. , T. fi N. , u'hi.c'lr would Lake good irrigated land out of . production, cau,,c' clecreahe in the value of land not to be under the proposed sprinlcle'r•, damage air quality, damage and alter underground water quality and quanfi ty which would subrsIantially decrease the production of the land in the major part of the area. NAND; AI)1)HESS -_L toi,J,31--& -0 `3i 7 1 r/r . // r,LC4 '- ( -- � ----. 39 ill' r) /4 C X-2/4 3 1141 e I) - ( .?- /1-) ').g 4'0 i, lel:/11.1 til —�/ '` 1/,-;.7, 7-,/ % 1, / Az- L .7 v. ni,__ it/t4,4_,y7-1.,_ ,/ "‘ 7/ o (Wc., ,,(2-e `--- _,,r1J2 ---.) 77- :j22,,j_elf,,l'- c:C CS-Z4-- I -: c x 117 (?,-�/ (',rte, /% , _.r te, (j, 7>> --- _./__,L 1- 1__ '1 t__ _c ' ( ik yikr1- 02,s7/,;17 ik,,,c /2, e.,O%._ -,:e4,1,7.6 'it J „L t6:-.---46:>frptl- on45 3793 6 PI 50 1 .,-,1 ., (e- fr/cc: 17' , - ) C .-al , - i) 12Qd. ___--:-. ' - • ..Cea00.-‘----d _&_,,21/'__.,_.-•- .-___C- .. • c5•1 N Weld RV w a.... / t ice '; _!c v�n� / yL�h_T- 2 'cl'- ; 1 ' I ; 'f' 1 'I' IOI \'Ve, the undersigned, do protest. and „l'. oel to the location or Ihe sewer treatment and land npplic;ltii,n plan proposed for rile No. l on Section :il, IZ. WI VV. , 'I'. Cl N. , ,vhi, It would 1.;11,e I.,,r„► tLJ•ilr;W d I;Iu'l -)tit ,,f , production, cause decrease ill Ih, value of land not In tae uttd •r the proposed sprinkler, damage air iIu;'lity, da.inaf;e and alter underground water quality and quantity which would ,ubsianlLily decrease the production of the land in the major part of the area. NA M I.] ADliti 1,SS e-,--,-' ,. 7 O_:„...._;,_ c--L2,- i c L42 6-- i2_ 4 1 6�_( j/., / - -�',;/, 6 �` A, id-1,/ - a',/, te2}2_ / _Z)•/' / Uzy4.3 ,Z .,e_ 6 Jr ,,-.Y- Xi/ ' :- ____(/) , P--( .f•/., 7 , (7).. - 7, ' , / k /-. / ''4',/ l' ( / !„.1j. /71,e.,..,„ --, __))., (,, 6, ,..„,_,-- ,..„, )....„ ....,,__/,..,,, , - 1 ` 'C z/ _et_. c -,1&C- . _i,' -__ =� `- ,...2 , ' =�= C,.� (' (2 -ti) > , e', cap.-._1.-V,/j_GA-zlzi-e...2.4.1--r-i64-.-14.11-ri-4---1^ f .i d 1 1 -L1, - - -- ==)-l c r-=-mac''2ct&w _.. 'IL..(./(-/_C`_,`, g(- :�31 _ Y,_ .-le _�vr.. _ / .�- - './_ 41 -1vv.- 2 /1.-a_j-ljf ___. ..di....z...z z....,_ _ji::::77_)c...._...,..2_7_.,____ _, (----- y_.4=4:#- __//4-_,. .„..s:/4,_.‘2„.) .gzziii 4,...,7/7_6--8.__--- l --��)2 . 4,4 / x'.. _ )� = /-? ifa r,-e c t 6-e-z--�_ r eV Ar- -- Q1, _� ' t'�_� C _Jf'P�' i-d. ,/ , - 6 , .1 7/ " / - .. ,_' i 1 V 7, 21q_eX,Iii e i'i' g j ' r ' ' 1 4 OCT 19a® �c� i. t .- . -.-t•�,,z�-t-l.. -s- -) ...�1,� _)/4_4=7 9 -- -7--- ------ -ff_ p --t A/ tJ Weld Ctiedi �� pla�nlag Ceram slat et), gL9 I' I ; '1• I 'I' Ic1 •N 1\ e, t}1c' undersr rt11ed, do 1,1 ul c':.l (1O1 uh l(Y(•t 'O thr lo(•:cc ion of I lie ';e«cr• Irr:ctment :ulcl 1:10(1 ,11)p1ir.lirun P1:1n propo;;P(1 for nile No. 1 on Scolion 31, It. 63 'N. , T. G N. , -which would take good irr•ij!•:riud 1:111(1 out of production, caune decrease in the value of land not to be under the proposed sprinkler, damage air qualify, damage and alter underground water quality and quantity which would substantially decrease the production of the land in the major part of the area. NAM.; AL)ll121?SS ( ,� • tA-2_LC� 1 L. 4. "VL(1/ _-___3 Li_ _ r? / 6-/ 1 ( r..,/�9, ia4,, ,2 6 _,..,,f. 1.1,t,c /3 w....„J (0 , ‘,1? o)(/ Y7____G,-,4 c _c-/ / i ( /( 1� ,-/i yam j,�iJ-<Z"_ /,) /__/ ..) ' ./7 i ,!�/:/1-IC --- :_.,41:-.2" ..g.,. X_,?—_/7"---12-.20:-,!--)___ _ _. _,:; ( 2./.7 -5.iefiLtr, 17 __A,_--64_6f- X7 _.:21/ lit/---4/16.11143-A._ - '-O-C- YititOrtM, ),. e4-1,(7-- '.ei...1 . ( e .-,-. :3120.3 .(2614, '3 2 ,"' trY2;21,___ ,:U.saec� Lda-4/ <<3J �/ 0x$/9 2-i-,('P'1'(Zy _ , ,, , , . ,---, . - , ,,,, , ,_,L..t,, _ ir--„_4-_,A,..,) v,--1_, ,) .g, ._-,/,_ze __el -e_f) 4„,,,,. 6-7- 4,,,7A,___ „c/ / 47,-,,,,,r_f_ ,,,,,,,, Kii i , .j. 6,,,_7_, 22-id_u _ce,.;,&____ �/�t-4 -a✓14�, (I- l', 'O,-1- //g ,_..Z:_Ci ' =L '� kg-- `'`fir e. --id„..2). • • C/3_-_-a__,,-____ 8/0 O 2 7 80 �� `n E D Vic.! 4.:, / TJr'�J I/V 3— /7_f -e i ti � ' _ S e, �,_aa4ing enmm[ss'to0/..Valt19 N I' I ; 'I' I I I ( I N We, the under ::igncuc-I, (k) I0 HIc•.'t 111(1 :1!) II c I I•, Ilya I(cc•,rIiuo Ili 111(.! :-a.wc•r treatment and land application plan pr•opn:red for ';if.e No. 1 on Seclion t' :11 , N. 1 I W. , `I'. ti N. , which would Lake roue J I ir1•iJ;;rlr;rl land out of production, cau:;c decrease in lire value of land not to he under the proposed sprinkler, damage air quality, damage and alter underground water quality and qu.rnlity which would subslantially decrease the production of the land in the major part of the area. oi NAME!; AUl7RESS 1. 1 -i f ./c4/.- --ii...,--yc,1 . f z -....2/21-3-.lJ-tlie' .N.-/..,,,,..6„_4.2. r C- C/' ____A,1 .ge.............7.27, -3--- , , , ________ RI_ ,t 2.."1.4,_ _.i_Lt_l_i____ . _—_7 -� " -- -- - z:� ins , ( / /f E.L..per-,1 tst J _e__ ic4�_ .177/ ' jer /1:5-b ,.=Z‘ 1,,,..._c __- 4_JLam- — r.. /,.1 Gy-LL .'.' --/-1. ,�„/^ _/ L 1.--V_ ..�/ _L f 6(_ ---___ ....a.,\ 14‘..oicy," :1, —f)., a. Y'l_I tkdi C.:\--P.... ')---5 4:42 t -C 1_ ( -:)----4-1.1 C ,>ret...4,X,A----- 1''' -I ‘- . 4( -"L'2,“ ).../c.c...,4/H- - ac.:10 Q /...,.._z—ca-k.. ....- //_---- _--,��_`./�__---�� ,h^`4 .may �~ I\��1 t • �--.rte -��+1L�{.. .1�' "\ .k_t_ ,a, - 1e3121.14._. "Ii 2 LA---:zt-.5-.--ii---24.A --(-9SZI/-;) Ce A.-` ,- /, 3,1 5 ( ,•,e, d r'-cof .1-- 14-- ..3,41, / 71E 57 .1 ' � 1 - 3i_ / abk 6-', I I. (00 /0 , - .-z a ..4211___,/ //c*k_, z�/4 (- e L.! '% c `� __.c--,L _„4,_:;2_12__&____k_ D"-A, < .?--....)...46_ ti: ::L. O !....::)\ ' 4 1^_ii 6.0<-,,LCI-L-_-,_ ,7."*",, e;tr_l. ?lVefd Caunt(jCO CV ,yoloc),yr,_) _ a../_,_6,ai . . ..0_ *. 1 in ua I' I.; '1' I '1' l () iJ We, the undersign:-.d, do protest and object to the location of the sewer treat111ent and land application plan lrr'clpo;;I'rl for ;;ilr` Nr). 1 On Sr'C'l11)11 'il, R. ('3 4V. , 'I'. li N. , which would lake good irrigated land out of ' production, caor,i: clecrca;,e in the value of land not to be Hilda r the 11ropo:,erl sprinkler, damage ;fir quality, damage and alter underground water quality and quantity which would substantially decrease the production of the land in the major part of the area. NAMl'; ADDRESS / f' - 1 / , , .0._____.u., )./1/ (2_ _CZ , ) -;77 . . / -.- )..t. r -, / . (LILA (-) „6) , ) .4'1:2:,-(/y ( (IL") - _,._r____.11,_ . :?--/ t ( Ifd_ , 1 1 C Lib _CLW__c-:' (_ (x4,1Ct -E -/'I 'd/ '}t ' "---' C.) Lk./ail/ • T / - � C - ______4z.V,__L-7,.4,_______ _, _ ______, ),_a.,_ c--_,-e---,_....._ ._ _ ( -71,, ._ r„ -) 2 (.2/ _ __,.... (4z,_, e k4,14/ ./14- IZ__'_....!,-to-,`: _,---- _„_.24 r it a 4 6, , .._._ ______ _____. _ . ._ . ._ „____ - --- 4-11e�-C'-D - - 1 c.c. .A../-1. 2 12_.0 -6- c-ki--0---....----. s__ __L_0(.__IfP__.0-k'--kp , 0,2021?4 c.S — - -- ;c5:-'2-3°° cn RECEIVED- - --- - - -- — ----- - - Plannin misslQa . 19Z9SVC, ' 1 -2 )EA/CIPYIttlf4UF 1&4fraStAd„) C'‘j'ak 3 g.3 e);2) 3 v N \ ,.,,,,,,,,, ,e, ,,,47 , .,6- a r-/ ., clo , ?s--,2-,2 —0.22 <- (-)tc ,,X. , ( ,x____, ,-1.. X LI (I. ��.�. 1 1itio /._../09)t4,...e.., Ail 1 3 a- 9'7�J1 / 0 » Sv c. 1, , : „s3,,, ) _... \. Ju .,-_ , ,,__ _ ‘ . _ - :1 - , ., _, . ) --x,-_, ii.iii\ . \3k_\0__ L ci ,L_12,(-\ A/..) ,0 v.f ( bi-, _c___\ _ 1 1,. I -7 fri )11.-A_A K \ 1 Lam- X1.11,,,�`'�l L Jk s„,__,,,—, �+— c �� " b- (y , 5 �J '7) — 1 -Z—3 .f / - % - -,911111;t4 ?)/i1A4Wts-7i1 •)&jL,Lt Te .%.3 74.8) ra r �. C`Ad-kt l,. ,,,,,,,,311. Ot C0. 35-6 — 37 g,, ,,,,,,, ti.„,,,,,,,3„,,,, t. cp k ‘54 Te_s- . /0) 7., W.0 Cot ss�o% 1 X 'L 0/5 L 9 5'�� 'ONCERNED CITIZENS COMMITTEE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF SITE # 4 ON THE SEWAGE EAST OF GREELEY NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 :s. •--1-7--) a-6e)vk. /o 3- 44 CtL - qt€A--/ 3 -6, -i.�a 11.44/ILI Igloo - iA. dat - 4g 0353 - �o88 / / i t �_ 6 J i ;1 ( f y , ,') .--r, 1 /_ ,--.,, / Cif)/ -g '? cIL ,c__ L --JvLy .\ 3-5- - -`-)e -/ a- 6, 'Y `vt lx.t. ' f,(1,4 16 - J g'3 S - ,O 6. - / y, , 3 5.:2 - C) 77 1"1-- leA-culYtuv 560 cv ^ CIA Si . Gvti,i 3 5a - a3 c(3 ' sz?V/,[. ..t. )A.U.l,,,i,.) 4k \- Nr --. ..Z - -.@_ z_____ 016 &)i-. Vek26,200 /(:)05 r09/X act. F; OCT 9s'8° ; d- RECEIVE M rkLP!rg enr-.:a_ ) O! / V 04 • PETITION CONCERNED CITIZENS COMMITTEE I APPROVE ON SITE NO. 4 [TAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. �° C/t /¢/J OQ Q 7 ee G ,ems. KY 4-7a� 35-.) -7 QS 2— L, "7if�l Y�C,� �iC.-�Ks'l�C-^_'r �� 'l�.iz'-SCI L��J�-'i • .2(7/ 76/-‘7 , ,--/Z) /C &(--e-../ , =3-5-t- V`=-3 ‘ X1,0 0-4-t01-(6 - 3-- c, -(‘-d-1-. 0,,co , ,ss-3 -4 Cg -e-13-5 ( ---) r` - �;,it� (, `Ida 1.--e_ ___ e e /„ C _3(/ P cis ,,A:,--v----71-rze7 --4.----p-c--2-0. i / e/ z 7 ,2_4/ St(gie ,.,"--1Z--/ /%1 / I / �f�f/y Lz,< 733 / 1 -r 9 /� f, -; ) ) ,v„ 5G I 3?— (-t c'¢_ ALe_P -3A 5-3 ` '- l Q 9:_a--7_ 2-i-c-Q-,-11- d-!2--ta-t-e,---x__, /9 ' Y , le. . e_e-g os‘ /7422 ,) . , ( , )__ /, >: (., c / C" G', C ---i• <• r - Z.3 i 6 -, (,-,-„t XL LB-/a ?7 ,2__.6.',._- .4- - `(" // 9(.2:- /,,-.„) .2.),-24)-1-e-Z4-&-5 ,-- 1-,7?e, ,4,-'7"i) ai-r 'dezLAC -45e-,(,C. cici aCSC j,,1,-e. _ e-i-�� 3 --/:721 SAC! ),o I< c_, P o. f c--k/ ;7)-73 , 1. a tt0 `I"C/ r r P7 :61 (0,11 Lv:- ',-, 31 p d-?,,zrJ ji %,), / ;)%. - 9,-;',Y ailikt,,,,_ 9;7, 6&,--O /3 j (4) ,.2_ ,-;_s/' ,:,./__ e(1/,feh, _ _5 -_9 -77-?-2- ---022324 (' _e.A-zr f ...t.,' 4.o.7 s AI p _ /3-74":44 ,4'-ea>4-e/ c- ,56 ---;77z9 1.� 00 V..,50 O� v� /./Q`6gL9�� . (Y-ze?_-4- i IT lo ii , . 7 --) 2e e/"/7 elcl C X„z' e4 Z5. (_ 102.-)7/>1./e' 44/0 c_.Dt 0 ec_./ 0/2 - - . Q/17 ,94/,/,7e/. ?Li/ 5;i 6e-- Q y5 le re)Sy Alci/erie__ adeht.a.& #44,-,e, dtt,o )b / Yc-99060,6,,z ,3 5 3-‘,4 Z_ YeA1-4-) 9 P9 / - -7 3_ 1 Cfeti 1 Al 4Sta ,,,, , „43 �� - ,a--3-, 5 L ' e 330-(./4 , -4_&, le:e.gi-ii->z:P ;74,25' :Ritz/A;E„ ,;;. ,.T - )) 71 a, - . )-7 'fr--t, _ ,.,,t., Ltic... J.Gc--,,. _ 77-Tersite , i cf-17 I- 3 ell> -5'-Y)91t,u, I ) . )214,e1.4.Li :2 es .? -5-0(2/2-40 ' Z 3-• 0_,L.yl clA Q_5l_b c./i) X(n (R I £/b c)S1-(1---- 7)-) �\C �� i �` ;'Gt zed c��-3� C`c��-�-Q-Q- :;s. ---)__ ��- V(6 ,4. j -2-447-1- � - >�-c�a //r4 73 '/I-'/,T7 la-,17, C.� .O -/i 7( e�.�, - c_.<_t , 61 0.4(7tti.c_ .5' Y- 695.53 /3 0-6/ //,' Z% ec? :ki/6 ,v 5-1-4-4'7,' (6-X70 4 3 5_.3 -C f cc' 6,� ..7)—z,,e,- -- W97 ` (6ife- ' aN .7 - z s-,7 r-•; ;;;fe l .) _ OCT--.7145' -4,,,,(---L--›- ) , ti.,7,-4-1- 4_i_ ck> - /2/5,-- 1980 RECEIVED 7,..c.-3._ Weld County o' Planning Cora©iss,nn O`6�Z95��2�� -,,,. -2,- 6,/..cet...,? . , . J , .:. ,,-'44, ,z --/ . I "---/:. -(....4,,,_.<_7 Lr`� i /6/,...„,...,) -- ') // / ,[/ /� ..„,/�J�cn J 0970/ S 'i/a .. c:'�.c.LGc/ „2f'/-5 Va ' .(y5,-,/,:,. /:r e c 2.j77CC vim-(C' , 7 4 o a /.."--67Z7Z 4t.'', .P c-Plc..-, . ..c",2 -,S y Al-- -\ C- . C \ ... 1h�CL- - r- ‘-F-i,C Cl `r) . != .-t_ \ J 1 - (,- 'I -- 49-/ ;1 )"/ ,J /<'-'/ (:5'- e:2(I l)')/?-‘''' / _S:J ,( ',?:,:•\,, [ 1- C'YZ--14.e_., 2 C,y/j,L G i L.6._{ c>7/-2,5d/e-LC Ge% t( C c r % '?'I / / ,14,--,,..„.., .., ctr, (. d 41ai )7).,m 3S. /e,c / <<�� ed 22/ cell /iii--/ /g "Le 3.3 ; -- V> r, 5— -, -t/ ''-,-7,- /17. ;'- �I---7 .L-5?/- 0 --�f/7i -x2/ K',',-c �- :7-_, ..) <. ,,`OO t; / f��Zc�it,/�� 2�TL't/ �/D ��/r' cD,` - F!�7' .!�jt-.717 _:() ) 2/7 Pr;/ c35iz a/Li. ,g, C,,e _ 3=� -s 77y -4,atiii 4:6-.I (6- 3— e/ckAkAl(---Yon.o ._ 6o 6/`w' _,,,ii Y. e..� ' .36--/- .„)/,_27 (/ r al p° c h- .cam. va��( QQ. 3a0 -04-10 4. OCT 1980 `��, .M RECEIVED Wald County c� Planning Co�aissia® o �16el 9.s-v c:L\ i ,1 M, _ Petition Citizen Concerned Committee • We approve on Site Four (4) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant Name • Address s • Phone i.1 • PV -e-11,17A--P 0), 2 t..t 3- Li - 1 I i i 3 ..1,7:2. • HZ ,,_t) _--- � ... --- __ -9,43O_ l!r_/C.��' +C QJ ":)_____6'_ 3 • is r46, �� o/� h" 1'5 / `' 3 '�y�- ,:_.� �a� ; ` cJr 5''r 36.-3 - 49'a vt k-2,-.1,O-77.1Y)--- -------- oa.7 _ cucl .SI - - _ 3 ;'—C1d 6______R,ke,..,,„...2.___.____.. ._a.-7,, Fir 2.ic...A, -_e-,... ..-eie‘ , _k-- T1=- - -- -rte --------- •_— -____ `t 4 e. - - Meld Waal r''' o - - -t • - -_-- . 4.9 0 ev Petition COI ,W . R�G �0 8 Citizen Concerned Committee ��iQ�6$ `gdeel prove on Site Four - (4) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant Name Address Phone#- n „I') / / _ o9.'1" n 7 77;.-,�{�I � ,� t ' -0 r7A O 4� g Ot zero 4_} ..._ - a_ _ ,_02. --7--=.4-1_4..._ , . ;-/-y- _4.:,i , , : . &taw&,e, Ofr,44„, --g--7&2L.Ehp_.,.gere -, (-??,53_."6.4edf �( 1-'�/Vic,. . , ____________„________L_, C.,(__ ,-____-"-WC-- l? - •_, -.)--F - my _az.' ,.deftL -,ee,4 --•_____.__ ________,Lf7jt:_z,e_qr =O4 ---- 2013 . . s g/ _ a _________„...,,,„..„ • , ... , _ _ ,,x,,-.0,,,....,__- ti...) --- -,.:5,„_,,,Z,,,, -.7P ____,__ ____ ___ Zr„..vT.E. r,tatz,t- --/ 1--, - 0Z_5(__Le_el-- - -7 t...---,6,- ,-...r.2sed„ CSI r7 ii _ 7. el.C ,t 4. — ._ it .e..."....." , , _____________ ....40 .-) _a•,. (..:,•7 - AL-/ 1 ..7 . aff;) -;e8e6/6, ...) :..__ f_...._,K.. , _,. ate./ _ _ ////-1.-! __&_- i � Ife^� -,F7- 605L3 v - NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE A. Bruce & Jackson B. Wells Jackson B. Wells 352-2952 Gill , Colorado 80624 State Board of Land 1313 Sherman Suite 620 Commissioners Denver, Colorado 80203 839-3454 Carroll & Arlene Bishop 32138 Weld Co. Rd. 68 352-8048 Gill , Colorado 80624 Theodore L. Nieman 2224 S. Ogden Street Denver, Colorado 80210 Jackson B. & Lillian M. Wells Gill , Colorado 80624 352-2952 Jacob, Jr. & Shirley L. Rt. 1 Box 24 Miller Gill , Colorado 80624 352-1749 (Ri ®[vv 1980 �O P^.l ition Citizen Concerned Committee • We approve on Site Four (4 ) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant /' NameAd<dre_s;• / I'hc�nc'F. ) ilelvtC,,,!/ )1.'4z�r:-, _ 3�/� % o�IY�'csr<yl ;��s's s 3 �)5.7 '/_ S), 2'/ 6,77P V `; ;- �. i‘ , tiaiLy kza. c:21,45,0tt,), ci, t.c.:.....,,. ILL) , et./L___..4eio ��i YI.o -_��f_ _ /� /� ,�--/"— —_ _ r ' `, y `4_4' 'nom___/(j_ - _ 1L _ �1 ,) 6 .2 Y 4 ,, 7 /_5"- €.' ,.• e �3Ar5 6 7c, __ ((........-c,: ?..c. -c_._elzec _ , ---, ----- ---- - —_ NOV 19$p -� ---- --------- 00 J — — — --- __ "' Weld Cone' m p, — — pl?nni� _ - --- --- -------- -- - -_____-- - v • Petition a 5 Of� 7 9J� Citizen Concerned Committee /....(1/` �"...,L1°)Np c`= � ' ppr ve on Site Four (4 ) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant r' litA c-: e%MT1't t;a m c •' `9r', t_ __. _ _ Phone-` -.—-5k '' \�4 ---------- - 7.7i_7(,-dt.„1..,,Ii441,0.41 -1-ct' :21,,P20_F-______I_CL— _ 30-8 3/y di _!._. _ ___ _ ______________g_ik2 .. __.,, - -_. --)....._ iz,,i, - t,./ ---7-7v /I--- /f1"---4- f/ I -'0L e_Pitt"vtL, ..:5S 2 - . .j37 2-J Jr_ --- - - '-L -iZ _st ��--,,l rriG- v)7'5,_\22 /i" ..t�1,� 3 d' 3,5-:_,:.< L` l 9 1 )4,_rr -- - d - ).`-'6__ 4_2_,-" 'c a 5-s J `, ' - 6) 77 / , ____, 1_,e,71.5-yy\_(3.-,,..q --'''72(-\-tig q /3 0 '), A kJ V ,-)7 6 '3 • --- ? tip, - _, . --- h 6.; _ x4.,_ - L - -,#4,./ // -(_ ._._;-_-, -0 _ ‘.35_,1 _ 6., go AIL --- -----,------ - - -, " --- e -r--- _r__ _-_z_-_-_ l_kc-6, (Ai ,P g 4 .:--,) .- % -‘- ----- --------- --- ' ______,_, _e_r__ . . ____ ,_3_,s,y --6,752Y _02s7/ 7 : i 7 --- — ----- - -______ .13.7.0__.& . • c z v,J 7 L_/ c ,J ems. G� ^— _ - 0 _3 i ---04—ZO_ - ____ ... .__ - -. --`1))/7///c2/?.. ....v5/,.7:f_.7c., ._ _ _ ._ .._:1)/.-r •-•'-‘ ,4-L-_O2 z(,..t,Ly;2_„a„,:b _ __________2_5:j..7.__,-3/07._. . 1 ,4/1 eA) . .."Ii.I-. ,=.(1..5 -1;4 75 -711 A)7 CO P CI tfr i `S---...:1-- XI 1/ : . ei/c'di,„ 4 ,/ ,,,i__ , . - _,,, _c__ ._ __ _______,,,_)„,,__fd--,/ . , .47_ _ ,,,,,,,.. ,w i, -- • <` ! L -,_(—_,r{—„., 1, e c- 6 I r t `l_ C L-. l �f I �( (.�- Jjl ---- 4 l - - ---- - �.5,4- (� ;L LB e-/. ---._i__-___ Atini,i-IL .;Lic 1, ti- ( 1,6e-Cre(it, a. (r3 6--,2__ z. ,v. ii_ -,., ,r 07., _ ,_ , .,, .. ,.„:„._ _ _ l i ' 3c3-640g C I PETITION CONCERNED CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE APPROVED ON AMENDMENT, SITE 4, SEWAGE SYSTEM: NAME ADDRESS PHONE' ..,>jef '2Iffrie_d_i &(2,14-67 f7 & 3 -a 997 jimitdet, (223 6 i -f-4S f - //p- ism -/9 C'3 di- 0 CA ///7 Wee � u �6.Z-Ooa � / ,� ,_ /t/�2 ,, //.2 /. _ *>/-/--_/ "-(4 2S----? -2o V M O 7- /fae."i-e-AZed.--ir J1sz_.z 5 y/ / X a4-,,/-/-r-e-„,./ )4.474e/ . ,7:-.14t-Z4 & , ,'c r 54 -C-.7 2_ XI:Lt. hL. H©24?-1- //v71 -3o `` it4, 41 y, g,C3- !t// )(d(z4 "..1,%) ;7 .2-) 2-x- ,›W, /,.(4 i-tib7,41-") _, , 3311 u1.f4 JA At. 35-2-1,43 --_,<,,- -,.." .-- 44.7.1z-,--- /31,:,-/- `.- ?'////'A-P'97) /%;,,-,. ,7 `5'-' -ig.-/d 2 g _ i_d_ Pb f- ,2o3 CUB(Iv, 6 �A d Pc) 2 - sI('( - & 35'O-K-2-girt-4- Y1Cl ck I<<z I I 1t Ok— k4 'J___ (' c c7,s-k� 3 S , — �� 3,2_,....„.i c /zia (7g tea - / J 0S3--r97? '21,,,27,41_,54 ez. ,•'.1c_a____ le.-''; (C_-1 • (r it' l_ -; C"--(41Q ' C 6 -q el- .--5.--so cf3 7 -,t6(, "// / ,A,4 4 cee 320-y3yy (,..? ,c-v-?ii,t,,e,,...__ /8-/<_ .2,6—S-'6--- .Wee-,-* & .. c-5-:-.217,2 av, nrI.C ag- 1(-- ,c),,,_ 4 3g , Cep Co 3S3 -Ssa'z 19 . , 6)/ . . 4iQfl . ' -� 26'/'/9 ec,(-)it z... e4.5 ( �/>_ e.-- '' 4/4°c.,,-76P eCi 6/2 .7 (?,/, g/6X/,07.eel., 7D'CLAJC? . S pie rn ; M2477._(;_, Ch'le/71L,Q,6, ��'®/;e, az A, / Y(59 C 358-t,4 P.c.< y 7 cry o�f� .2/z/• J �`� ((- a'?S 6- 4/ ce 330-yam' e,m, J 7/?5 ga % kz„.- 2.Sd - 9 7i2 l7� z- - IThz .94,-z -3 ?87 C Z U' �� / �" ,U . �1z1 � - 35 b- Z/ ff r � 7 r L t�c k/ SCA.,"er.--r-ea-c-^1,-- /) . 9 -1 d ic�-f ` , z,.5":.> _.5�i- .)- 7 9 '2-- ' I 5 . biLted„ -2 ),s• 35 so 0,,,., 33c)- yo 77 L�L-n ciA c_2.3 �.�1 D�(� 1201 �/� �a"y' .-) 1 l��` . 'O-2- \koi,,L( / , ,C 9 , / ) y /777 t"."-- , ii- 7;_t_4-- '27" ." //e'7.--7Z ei.,,,/ , ,_ ..e..., tt y, c_;23- ,-.2 1/ 7/ j f-') - - / / )` Yt-c-k:-,( ci otOctgitc_ ,j1 r-6-553 So? // ' /'ice (e ..,? v G , g'r (/ , —A j 3 - ¢'occ ( 'L?6,(/,-~' ' J 4-6J.-- ,9'97 .5-14/P- O),/-kaz4----, 0 ; 7---z s-1 . 97_e?" ,(Z Z4f ,--i j;/7 i.;1E-' 6. -7 Idz--:-- 15-3 4.g-v-y .724w-=',//1/,(,- ) 4--z /1/7,-/.4 _j- ce, -c42/5 N. /7 y a 3_,2/1<('CI-44,- ,,Z4W , V6 -5/ 7 6' Y Gl rA,l��L `-0' - '7o2.-*3 j Y c _ °' "ti'``p ' `� a ✓ l 3 G o l7 ..-4,eivi - „4--/, 3 e s 0d.,-n."„)„ ,h_42)54/1.2.1.- 3'..5"J- . _!,:> 7 ,., -"sic. — 1 /- e.t) 4 c./ -?..-e/ f-- ---S7'1, ._;'�= '('. _tea //6: GC). 4�d): '' - �-' 1 6' e_ 21_,,,,e-a-r-- /' / i / / // - / - --- . - 0/5-crl-L-q/' /z .y— 3.4)4'-a / t .3S3 / 37y .-c-,_ (Ai 5 L 5 1E�,�., y 0),2-02- .5 .-c-,_ _'/4 ' - cl-ii .2, ‘ 2)7' -_e -,., . _ -, -7' . :14,;‘, 6`..j. .._1, ,ie.z.e-L. :.2 3 a/3 -,1 PE+ ,-3- . 14,f s', .1?1f-%,.) - de 9/. . - y / ;6 e" • (e.)) keeV,7" (Y-1.-ii • (V _3i-:_:7 -7e P q011, 2- • Ali��c• .. L...„ �s� • 311 A 61- -,I G,ec, d l' . ti /e Pelitiun Citizen Concerned Committee tic approve on Site Tour (4 ) [or the Greeley Water Treatment Plant. r. am Address I'honr,f______ _ Z.-7Z3-&—‘Z-6)-C-e- ga-C-ff 3 5133-I V.) (7j.L.„ 4 , (-___ -- C--1., k-t3V,A17X) _,g_27_,2Y_g__ _Cz_e___ __ZA-_- ,1 < M� - g� X36`-? 6 q62/- . __1_72___4Zczil_'__4'r ._____3.673 -_-__C_Lo _let_...___ _4(i,i__ r_47.4,‘ ,_.z,_ __z... ._-_1_2____,______________ ___q-ci ____c3'y ______Zn--___—_19_2_____Z'7 fc,,,11-0.? ry) ____R,„.../a _.". , _ ,,___,L...„) ,---) -,,, _Ft!.___zc-'-cy-7; c___L/ .;:__-) ...› -> -- c?..,(1) ,_- c .. -- �� 4,, _ ___.4...215-31.;?4,,/,__ ._,_.:)_0:1,c,.,._.___,__. i . —.7-, -7:- 2.2%-/Z----6 ----_-- ALL LoC -- erl • vz/4_ - ____ ______4(._2_,. . ._?---4.4t )64,4, CIL_ I Le Lr- ___i*-3o.s-rp.(- - -i__________:___ a____-_?<)-s--c) I ic i 9 • . Petition Citizen Concerned Committee We approve on Site Four (4) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant Name Address Phone _F Jl J -3 IC1-4?-71- 1L—Z1- t-')th-L-----________2q_q_59____ILLZ-a rt.)01(11 _10.kbKei Ix' o_______3../..60.76?eo. Q_ _____-' ____ --, __ZIL , e:.): —_17_S_'�-� 7 e yc Lf/-____,4-4/ �G' 'j^ IOW ___4,-. ..--7s -----5;"•17c f ,. . _��rLl�_•�- % i�,-- i •, _ D / - •-?' s -1--e- `;'. - ------e: ..,____-:1:_-_-_________ c 7-.22 - _A-- ' _6 -I—LCIAIZL--1------t-4PD2-6-614A4____,-2.6.3_.I '2--2-(21)�� J ____ET Gy --�U X71 , ( ---.. -__,9,, '_ __4_( 11 1,;r__/) __I/7i) 0 <-{W - -‘___,4_,,/:-___,___L-S__-'7_74 - __ )g-_-___e,. -t,. --' •_5:' --__W -_ _____ _ •„,-. _ ___)____ _ / --4---.1--7-I----11-c LIS__ --__si%Le-.., X- " —01"--- - - __'_________41 --e :///_/,.p ' A7.1.....„2:25,7. ----------: —c__...______:___,_,___ J-_______?_ ,",..,.. � ��k at _ -lam _ ----V- ' -7-A111113--2--- Pew . CZ__/_k.2_ / - 7 2 t2ia iclAir,/^.., 2 /)(1 t, IV / av,A,r,( Le., -) O\f/ ______. _____ ,7), „ .'?)_..cs -,... „ .i.'- i, c _"/ 1.11.6 1---!_l_l_ fr_1 -_ :-7 - ________,: fl_d_ -_ -_i_3_______ , 4/___ _ ' -,2- 7_7_4______R_4_5-c (b ' 4c-/-4-1 AEl.____________Dsz7 U, _ , 3" 63)3 = - -L-771.,,,L,__2:v.e,:e4 - - cm .. __________ze_2vy______23,,a___ _a___ _______ „..i, _ riz___ —GP-,---1-'L.y\‘‘-, ,__i_a.-,1-a,,2_____ ..c."Va,-. 1 `_. ____ace)c-?,---) - -)___o_______ ___ZP>1_,______A_33:-- ' _,00-. . -___a_4 _,i/__ __,____gZa<Zith,'/V,;? _,eee,' „c2(.1 e---- > - . ? / Zit--,__I-- -(9.et , (,,•r- /A,2/ et,e at,'„ •)Lc e'c eve 3'5' -3/'`'1.;41— X..-e-_ /7j/ 6, / //z_e_ Lit.l 6 _._5, 0 -a) ' '-/ (7niti 74.,ticivi,D fo r )9/9601e,i4altife,, ,a 4 7616-- iL2z4,ie c Z&;5,..- -Seteti, 6Z- 5c.5.0-3 797 --LSkli,L, ✓/ v > S 7- ,D ca C(J• ,; t,u_ (V 0 h- /9 G -6(,t_e__L-P 64 :3 _')` o /Lf-. ) _AQ ;-%�ji C C)C-R LEAS / 6:i-r e �e Co . - Y ; ll i ,- - t-(-j , - ‘--'r?.-, -l.— / 32( Zu--h*IleQomf3on 1671 18, - u3. a\-) oc,/it,- // . '17 ) z-) - /1247/, i 2 %,'51/_ej),i1 , Aj 35 3- b 6 aJ \ JO 0 Petition Citizen Concerned Committee I . We approve on Site Four ( 1 ) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant J NameAddres , Phone':--____Ida'i i''' 1-74 ''' (, ,eZZ-- Z-1: ir2,K__ V-__'_ _ z4 _4',, „g,-5----?-7Z/8 ''. •_. ',f�--c,�? 4i' `'-� ,-C 4}-7-� -i- - 3 ?7 .4s�l �� 3�_4 3"74."1 -- . /41-6., 7),.__ /V.PA-1,4427 ____ 3 i y_z E: _/( - cw-s, d-3. --A--7. 7. 1 : --�-� ,--- _ � ti lVI - / '7 2) A� �Zrz)y- re," .-1-f i ._-_?1,(4__._ }_.(9, tt�1 'i-d_ 0. 3 ki�� (c g J _____ // ,,_.z.itprx„ ,?-3,/,-,_ jey'6_,-. c._ .s- 'r j. 1,,,,,./,,,/ 5 2 25-7 (7- .21 ‘rt,.) el L‘,..7\/ /(7-) i •-r/P( L-C4 --- -- -__ _ _24.1 C7-__A1. .C_f_ii.ot--61 23.4 - , _____ _0, ,__,1,7 , 3.).2.- ,5-i-90 ..,i,eit,b,,..<6.4e,i24:4::i17._ (,L_____ _c.c.-,1_ .1__ __,z, ..., .(..-- ..-K. (3, c? ' — Ji...r4,:a .C4ji.2 Z_Z-e.// `�- • I/(/ / / �1 , 0--L-y-Lz-i..1, .__,j J�-�D {.C,,c4_,,,/ ___ 9_._Ls.L__L__-_:__z_,__6__ e_ .e.d e-i) - 4------------_________Th._„743‘_±t_,ZCZ(ZiC___ _ ..6_L-Lk__ ___Q_ZI CD-f:3-- -3-0'-, dW�« 0 . _ - -3 7?/E, / > ,� > i :,_3 . Cikzec_..4.212c i 1).0 , , , 1 , . (r.:71 .L',. Cc 4 ' / L ;y '-' C r G'',-,3 \22,/ , (Z_ie2 8447-7 _ _ ..1 ___._. _ ._ _______A '7____q_e_i__ 2 ''i ,-5.'_-f.i_i__,5:_t_f);_.._ C,-/______)--_ _-d_ (die P._ 6te i ( , X;',TTledeeel-_-_)_QLL_WL I II 0\ ? 6 ,3 7 igi.1-clA -CQ L221 .,_:?,_ ___2,..elSeV,.4.-. _ go63i P- '9----=-4-eil- . 1- 4 p_ 43' ' ,,--Zr.,-4 k__aPe-'41.______ x,:47 Y-7 Z:)- .4._ ___.2 )) ' 1 k ----___3_,-,_.3.-01.x.. zI PETITION • CONCERNED CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE APPROVED ON AMENDMENT, SITE 4, SEWAGE SYSTEM: NAME ADDRESSp. PHONE C(' . qefr'd J z/1� .2 a/V- /a Xi ��. - a� -'ePo1 27 'Twit- -�r-( . -?-? ve _ /__2,S7 7 g),4 , ,55-- - -,,?v,‘ u� t___3 ,-,____ �a ( 3,,e &�„ h:u.._G`Q 3,5'), - S G g . eA � ea__,„,_ . ,2q 1 w, c Q�� ., �� - ri _ 2;11E-1 v7 ) ? - J/ "7-- .b--, )1 t__ru z _s2L.c 3 s--J..—O 5z,?___ f 7 c . 7 G zvie____ , _))/(5--- .2": ,-77l k)(-. 6-_,-/-6c4 (z - Y..5-, - /mot 7f7. I2 AL.,%-e -Lz .LIC.4 —a2,. ( ,-;5_5%,-/_ ,7/ c _5' '---n4-)- t-c---;:f/Ccl � •2/�ci - c.,2/ /-Z 6y 3 .5-2 - 2/-1/� WI-6„._ S cL J yip- 3. . , �� 35 3 - 6 Yd() �-7 cr7/zV A76-/ 7, _fi r'c'eg 4 . o3cS - as -G, ebVV7- 1, c ?C, 4,744-0-n,-- .. j-? ? ? 1-eW ‘ 4,9,,z4 ..I 6--- - O"8174 -,% y 7 q 7 fit/ t. a s2 li -ei, 3S'2—Ex),54/ 1 s1 r I'" liLi.rn b ! Citizen Concerned Committee We approve on Site Four (/i ) fnr Lhc Greeley Water Treatment_ I' l ,int Name A(Iclres:: Mionr . -4-_tig,(49 :::-7-1,,e..cdAex‘e___(<:_________________790 . .,2 f''2/-� c f,.1 r t ')__^-----. _.----•— - _-,,C('Ce- /i 11/4i/Yr CC �C --. ..E3 g.g ci-&-e--' 4L, 171- L l _ / ' i -_ .G�,0 %lam _n_-G it, ' __c_-;_7_0•fill_p__:_ee2 ai ‘O..1 ,5),.4---z" -Zer.f2.,.--.1 )1 :-1 / u_.) C'—. r),_ (00 i 7 , .. (-4,-,__A-- -/J. .6___L-1_,L,b1--1` 4ij.e. .,A = g3(;C�...'-a"� 4`16 6 `, v ,---yy . ___ _ ( ))/ :_-_, , aic.:eaLcici _) ___6-;? -__,74.;-3‘7/ I i r__________ _ ________ c.51 7 v66 z i _ '''' lec_5(Ja/ C- , >0 L [ � ...:-.,,-/) /1 - - - .-- .-- -�?-l' .�-------�`•� " '1 ,fit lei s '7 'L-___,"4 --�!� — -7"j /<-4 "LI _9_5, l 1 ' _St,t/d4Pte.- e, C. (2 ) (1 Z ..j/ t --- -----• - -- �(O-o I _ U,5 /,l 3 /I ' ; ,'/ colAL.,t,,_i - -- -- - - - -- - .` -_30____. - - . Vey-s C _ 17S - ----f-Oceil I---3-1-- -Li ' —tth /-.-..7 . . 7-_.‹..e&e.--_-..',-til- _ .__ 3JZ41/_ ---.g..., 1 . . _ . , _ „ Cd_o 9 ' /-- Petition Citizen Concerned Committee We approve on Site Four (4) for the Greeley Water Treatment Plant. Name Address _Phone,? yjil Li C _.,-"<(- ..' eel r., z4 .".,___-:7,2)---5-79,...5y 1^ . X- e'',...4-?:::....<-::-9--.'"-- si , =� , t l\ -it 1 l .ar t.O fff� - yU7.1_ __j ///f�} i „,14.441 . ..3 o ,t( . y"t4_ -Lt ,i'____, .., 4./t.✓/ ��,� _J `.`,-(t, ( 4-t ,/� .? 4` v✓ y r1 A — -----� ,l 1 .f 1 / 4 ,, Petition ' Citizen Concerned Committee • We approve on Site Four (4) for the Greeley [dater Treatment Plant I I Name Address Phonei ti ar,pcsikt . (5-am.&2_,Age„ , , 77 :-8. 1.c.ie 2 ,e,7,,,s_ , . _FS'S-90/ 1 'j1;'.1) f' ,-r , f r, , I /r , 1 16 "„,- � . 7 /- (2.s L/ / ,-, _ ;.=rte -: , .,, ---2Z-4-ff.f.74;9________^_______________________—.5.,c,e__ ____-7 . /2 _:./ - ✓ff7 `/ i ,_ f v i / J --------- ,_.6.,___÷._4_ ,--32..._ >/<��-c- - J' / f - , ,I _ ' v l 1 _;),,,/:../ f ' o � I a 1 lutt ' 3 .0411.1 PETITION 6' WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS lii;.%"✓L�> ' .fee /7�Y�,5 4 21. -k,, --)."•)tc (: \ 'D 2. ../ e - x/3-5" tc' .0 /41-5-� 7 ' ;z 1 � t%5 /3 ./ r e co/ At' / O<`( 3. ' i'-- . • t . )2 ( I' - )/ , - ..-e / 23. -7/c 4 -' 2i ) q53% 1v�s, 24.G , �'- 4 td),,.._ 7 ;( .1:4-1 ._ (?, Zi ii 5._��t �er_,�.i^ .-71-"�yt -;?c1/-G/ 7 ,,,,, 5. 6. _- - w ,/' _ -..-:%2Z7: .�‘,-_,u,,,4/. 26. 7 ./ 7. � - i4 J-27/6 /.S 5 IIVI-i; 27. 8. }{(...c.?.�I' (� L; j.,-;_'((j.,-;_'((". -jt{' - 'r,//., j Lt - -28. ( , 9. // f -2/-2-5; - /S-S-1, 29. 10. ke 1 J 11a tL4'.i._,_ Ago r 4) 'of� 0 11. 1..-/'`d�.,'G2 f/ ',--�J97e,. 3 g-- -- 12. / �" 32,. 13 --/ni /` e\ .417& ' ,, I 1: 3. ---17,567 /, 14. -- o' - j 0�� c,IC )In `�,�� NOV 1980 -7,e,„ yidfienitl 75 15. faLly,J / 2 &,t . -q)/ 36 /964g, 1 LP, Mtrti gall" 4) 16. ey -2-- - -e•✓!��C -/j /26- esseZ2z025\�� /� 17'. (/'/ Y�% -c 'r;,%i.f, � 9 /3 !"-,'(/ 'r,37. 18. �''l ,',/, :=,'.. f-//;'A'1.- --i =i'-'!• -. -s A_ 38. 19. Q--1,--ct k/'-'2ite)-> //• r'• "6 39. (iY /7/ 20. '-z- --2,-5:7-r- ---4F9 ; 41.,5 .i ->1,-/--c7.-{,-,140. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. � \ (. 4.-).,_(- \�? tic-cc),..L 21. 2.t. �/G �'�--.�-e) /,K,/ J l 4=-1-, 22. 3. t t ',,,t) ', ' ' i', ,, ;,k ` C" 23. 4. /1O?-4*Z c 24. c 1.2 .H--pus:, 25. 6 cti LtJ f.ZW,2 4 - /`f c-G`rc. of 26. 7. ti6 ivlo L-v• V • 27. 8,,/ _Dif/ 101'..e..L D/- 71-7 (4 28. 9.&./.g.-"& Zi 2.,.6 /6'/ .,7 ,&9. / 10. y �-23-2 --�-_= -_ 7/<.z.cl6;, 11. , '" ? J ' //.f, ` ..(///(:.1 l//- , 32. U 3 -ti C-ez.-c� /) 1..�-/: r 1 -6 ---:'(--/---5- -.:(r, 277-6 ix) 33. ;%nnQ0 4 G / /8-.2oIAy df 34. 15. �ij-.�,' ',2,--)--77-Z -, //.C�/f , 35. 16. e' r / , (1.-- _,--,,,2/' V.36. Y 1 2f . c d /We / /(6 37. 18. 38. "'�,1;, . /�9 Jl r, � ao 19. 39. �� O� '�y 20. 40. r' c,;ftr� - 3,5.' PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY • OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. 3/ZQ-17 e iV 3 21. - /i' ( _i ! ,/,,,2—/J'44}16 — . 2. .. e2�� 2• ''' �'`�.C' it..:LPL` 4") —(-3,A''' f,, 3. /63C 31 Oka . 23. _,'i '" (.2 eLL , - /if/ ? /- 4. 7: -e /8 0-a, 11_,:,, 24. ,i� /.', '‘ 5.. th-f' , -''' -L L /1C r,.�._ �\. .). , '� __ /C,25. ' f q11 D t1101(it'G' / Z?/"1)2 ,/7 / -41140-6 6. a/O-o /2,397L— 26. ' or 7- 37 7. R % i 3!O f 7 4 . 27. a6 t3 .- /a6 — 8. ,03 ?IS"S+, 0 28. d ,_btu4tit." /0(0 s-1qU. 0,64- 9. 1. (1' I,1, I ) 29. pvvk \m.,012,7/ Lt.4 S'...- Q,— •J e,9- 10. --en� v 1,,s.--t. ., ' d-1-57),— "ti•. -37(30. 67.,,,, , ,:i 4.y7;:)74, -4,7 /L .- K1/1' ' ' ? Z'' '' ''' ,,---_, /- /1/ 'r zu/ � .� 12. 7 ,�� L . /G /t A4r1ier:3// 32. a /z" ,,-,.__ 1 ) ✓ /,L, 13. 33. ts '- !'r4%7�li ' /- ;;,/ r t� ) 14. g_____ligi______AP / 1/ 7-7-5.rA ve sr 34. :.. 7,4./S- ;2/ _P". 15. c j/ 4,1 -81- t-,,,2%, -1L zi4, 4.4e.„ 35 / ; /��.,) °��o s�i'� 16. a `) i g-aZISIA-Oe- (. 17. D - 37.n ,, 43/6 ,� -//l 346 18.E 38. 2 �5�, a // ,�t.,') NOV 1980 19. I V /f/ 6 "/, 39. p� -- 20. L ! 3rY - 7/ ✓ a 40. `:r W&ir��We PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. rG.s a 4 AL q -.1.4_ %.."L 'c-. 21. •S‘(.( r•,//•'4,-t, /ct 1.t,04)-\ /-'// iSJ J /c/, 7 2. • 5 , ,,-,.,,t,_ c...0 22. (, ,_;//) ',L./ c- ..____,.., ,,,:7(;',12/ -47//vi 6- , -7 e-d , _ , IUV , ei,r'')/_,..-2 ??6,-;'fit 41,!i 3. t, (•iz ' . f 2ez,",1 L.'d2z•e_% 23. ii_e —26/9 }'a /# / ,- g Q..-. 4. nl&4 ��1zJ .. /.44//z,, _.732, 24. ) ,-.--1 /3?2- y9Z' 5!" �( r /& ,2/-., -,.i.#.j 5. . /- ;i' - I . -- 25• 6irz.-. .1/ c.6'v >44.v P-Z.L, , o 9a,4- / 3 sue- 1� %�lz ate, ci; 6. ,,✓ Z.Adef %ice/1,y_ �e`a6.�/ 26. .C/lr � ,C , ,.z �_6, 5641(` aJ/ ot7.�. a. ,ItoiS`-- tgAJ 7. ,� '�'� �,X �' , 27. G , --��t �� ,,1�:.__� ez �6. 1 //' 1Y83 2 Id. 12.w/ -7 / 8. -i 28. �4ln,j ,� 4,..S .../4, C e If'f'y 9*112 4 A 4R-1 Sritwry,4,,i- 5 t 7.14.4e.,331/ell 5, 29. . • . c, W 61. _ y:ei.... 4. g 2 10. (gip. 30. 7.50 e' w /� 11. , ,, - ke ‘:1/7 x . .//, �� &D, 31. r aced l61-3i �/ .2038 -4 IP ,4IL 12. Yl7 aA.te a 7nahtayc a4ederf, Co. 32 /973 -Wog e"' 13. / g 33. Of �C.12 BAS si.es... auk-. ' (- / _ , 34. /?/S- 6 .3 ,in 1� _-t k 41 #t r c+s 2•17/_? /yY.JY 15. t Y�L��.�.@t/' asjt.(,71, }t"4-LC([c�3 CC' 35 �r� , Co �rbG ( _ 1820 Akwro/Ew �; /f.,r-ozi •{ c�16. /,I �Gp� �s �. W � �42kez yj C . 36. '49 -- � ��' �,.',-:_,.=«- c., . T :, ‘'" 029 =Zl '' 40,_ L. 17._____ /e;•,..—__ (.`-_-«,_y c 37. 6te.1. C . s. 18. -i1�_�e C�a,.-.,Z�,: A,/n/..,,�-,,/_.„,_ '�-,,�CM% 38. / v ,,c 'J - �,.I t% ,/e, r 1421 4th 'b* . a Q 7 r i 19. d.(D. �e Ghee tzx �• 39. c,.- ' ;--, '.c..7` ' ,i J:4,;� i C 6 . 2 A'20. 'l� I I ,',z, „ - ��1,1 40. � e p �..-- • E'l fitaGetiE° -ci'a. c-Sc, flanninu Commisstot PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. % v. SAD 7 vL J • 21. 2. ,� �r/� /92.r2gAibe 22. 3. dsete,,e- 23. 4. e l'b' L 172,E ViZda,ft 24. /kci /25.5. / �� -u '( // �G /` 6. y Ya7/ta / 26. - 7/,/ 7. A p l' , 27. 8. O,Z A. 28. 9. 29. 10. 30. 7 11. 4 Ar 3100 12. �, ` 32. 13. - ; cti� 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. • 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. Bann R l9oq C9Lmna9na_ bloc'. 21. 2. (.m4eA-„tka,toet-- ,174' I2`gS,4- Os 22. 3. g , /j2 /. /_3G� � 23. 4. fall- _,W1 4;-/�.�e24. 5. 25. 6. e9 26. � �s ,r g80 7. _ 27. i Y 8. �> 28. cs��cc 16�+ 9. 29. ' 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. • 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. dN.44_6&)Q&-c_4‘..6_,.-_,-;/ 7,.,z -44/C4,641,---'2-21. 2. 22. 3. a 23. Nov 1 Ja® c_zs 4. cy, a, 1 24. total 5. Vc_oing Dstim 25. 6. 26. • • 7. 27. • 8. 28. 9. ' 29. 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. • 15. 35. 16. • 36. 17. ' 37: • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . _ t7 ' ''------‘ 4 21. 2. ,72,17; L,,1.s. '/ vt 1,._'12A. •;L/r7 , .�,,,� - 22. Gl ) Y 3. �i/ Lv, r i,L,�.t:,,,!,- /L_ e''-. . ,,--c-%• 23. • 4. c4w //20 .--.27 24. 5. At4-PI-41 S ; • 5 • a - 2- 4 'SI- 25. 6. ‘-:--;e:'.,_ /„ .!A / it,,e5, , 1, ad c-3/, 26. `LEY i 7. ,,,,c -„6.111, =.•?---7 7 ' 1,e-7L-k-r-47L <-2 . C // 8_�/ �� /_..1--'7 -7 j 4 28. /lam ' 9. ' 29. - ; 67 10. .,`� ' 897 30. �, 03 11. ”' Qf1 lli 31. c �� {a� 12. ' fa:_:t.� 32. _>,, ,:\ 13. 33. • 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37: • 18. 38. • 19. 39. 20. 40. • PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. (.v. • l 2277 c "IN . 21. 2. �1�►��; � ,t.11-, 11(611 ( 213v :As/ di, (= 22. 3. ">>c',Z Pi- % r, J1. /4/23. Cj/ 017 24. `J 7 5. •j%/�� r _) 226 c r22 &L L 25. 6 A'y// / /%. /f J . f !1 i J /V26. . 1. �� `�l' `�- g is 27. 8. 28. 9. . -i00 / 89 - 29. g'? mo\l 'g8® 10. -O 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37: • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . '1. (/-2: 2: - - . • ,%' � ''' , 1<S/ ' • ' 21. �L 2. / .). 422. • 3. , -1.-.,r' .,/ g LO416 r4 7 ; I -1%A 41 C 23. 4,(J7-.45{- ,.A--- ;;-Al? -2/);:;r!'",'`' • 24. /• 5. , l i/,,l/%✓!%.�-- ii..i7 i -' 44_,II,�4r-e-.c,,_25. 6. ,z ado,Y mil , 26. • 7. 22/7 1219.2 ,Sr.QP. 27. • 8. 28. % ? ~ -vim - 9. 29. �, 10. i;r:_r3 30. -\ _ S. \L?) S"��- 11. !:, ��° 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. . 15. 35. 16. - 36. 17. 37: • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. CIS2 l%�,y /j'-)5 :, M(Ik?n3/21. 2. /iro ,Je4dile o�� .21fil'lgve (194(122. 3. 23. 4. 24. 5. 25. NO141980 6. (t,_ RECEIVED 26. 7. 27. 8. 28. 9. ' , 29. 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. • 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. • 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. e_n✓1e I-1, Y�cc�`�f ,�z � / r 21. 2. �� 1�.- � � -�. � �s � l 22. 3. m 3"?3 /9rry .Prii>a 23. 4. ffZei74,./ v ./ .14S5 ?64 C ,t.e., 24. 5. /iv E Sg3o v✓ -Z 'hs 25. 6 c!-V,,-(9O12)/,,/, f> `71e-2-_YL6c ayr� 4.26. 7. 0 / .A1. ? - 1i27. 8. 28. 9. ' ��' 0 - �' �y 29. M � �i•7 10. n r r'v, sa 30. 4>> ' - _• V1,1--- 11. � • ��' 31. 12. 32. • 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37: • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. C.R.c`6qui - z183 • 44 21. 2. iri7 --"2,/,%.0.-1-4/4.0 22. 3. ".4%5S/ 23. 4. 24. (j1,56789 1080 5. 25. h yvU� Recsvv5) 6. 11x01 Va:a 26. 7. s� Z��. -\;16° 27. • 8. 28. 9. ' 29. 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. • 36. 17. 37; • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. A Let :'. t,C' (7Le SC{ 6) . 21. 2. / f °247/�i�'/// C 22. 3. a e -�../U.4 23. t t, 24. 5. 25. 6. 26. V.OV1 ,��1'�1 ED w 7. I 27. �l ) _nr(flfk4t�ca [ 8. c42-' • ' 28. G^ 9. ' 29. - 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. • 37. • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. %3- � ' -/Z/ i ' 21. �ti /�r.� /''o� �5-`446" 2. �J%� f' fkk-- 22. rz'zda /.'' VVo6 - 4'S tic/ _ 3. _ . / s '_ /S/ /� __s�.!` 23. L1-1-1 I :�C ft �� 24. 5. 25. 6. e L 26. 7. • I(os, 33 `c\ Ave. 27. 8. � -13-/t s a 7-'f v c.....2)3. 9. fa"`?IIE 29. 10. ., � � s c � �► 30. 11. ta4A4. '/7, 4 31- 12. 32. "��23 4 ?es, 13. ro J 33. 4 1P RECEIVEDW 14. fez c!c'd Colin 34. `te , Finning Corn ��oissIon c 15. `��'C �� 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. • 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. fea G.'711 ' -/21. 2.Amt ie V`6-a Ed.4_ 22. 3. -e--2 /�Gi 4.i / 62'4\ 5. - ct V/e 25. 6. 3305 334tgi.e•4 26. • O,2/y ' ' GJ� t 27. 8.1" 9. O"`,''( ?l YLt„., 31 3-2 i4/1 &429. - r 10. •'.�,.. 'C� kk 11. o.f,r/1" o2‘j Qu e- 31. 12. C0MM F/Arja Ic. /0,4 (T5(iAil e6 32. 13. /82i g--/7 7L, 33. 14. c c7// 1-.22 2034. 15.91---4gl'airite30107 ,,/(,,d,17,,,,,35. 16. r 36. 17. Ov 980 ' 37: fe 18. '_ C1c��t'-°14 e� `v''s' 38. 19. :()c->4 ��7 ��' 39. 20. 40. V PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS I // I 2. /12oLs,-41(,tjkt.:—tL' / 2 / �c�t�5,L A— 22. 3. (1(4_ _ _... / / - `r :i-3' rr:# e 23. 4. ), /0 lAer..00 1)R- 24. //-11, _ /}1 1 ! 25. 6. 1-` C7 I ?j 8 5°s 26. // 7C7 trs i IS:2) z/1/4 -- 27. 9. 29. 10. 8a � 30. LI Re 11. N Cleld CaanCi 31. vla12. • c;:??r- 2 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY • OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. / 2. k._;/L /n4,y, 22. Gr � . /r 3. !� � 57/‘1 /G'. 23. 4. ?-1/4 24. ' I 5. (( , 25. 6. 4 2z A rV/ 7 - Y/�s 1 fG 26. 7. 07 27. r 8.9. ,�, 4 C c,113/-4f �C .c-es1{ % 29. 1�0 /uT , 57/9 zrJ 30. 11. 0wkA 2700 31. 12. 46_ ci-Olvitorri, 50. 4-1 26 pa st 32. 13, - • / 1 / ' G4- 34. 15. 2,0 '% / ,4é1 /k .3 .307`7/*i' 'O%35. 16. nAAAAN \M41n,\ W0( 3T36. 17. er."--dleacrifite-dd-e-.....o2,3C,30 az3 37. 18. 38. O� 19. L �j� 39. 20. 40. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS .23o, S'wr..t 1. vw4j d'e6J. 21. 2. �L'rt ( l-6/ C 9Cr3 ) 22. 3. • 4(t.`..:/ _, �;l� ;�� o `� Cc ! .l 23. 4. '//Z/Z )47/17( a7teg*)°(/‘71t00-/k24. 5. _MADIA,1/ Se64(31 25. ;cr ,‘;.7z '(c t/ , /lc c<'�u CO 1961 .J'/ 26. `/ 3V1/ Sfr, 7. ?jvvtA 4..��1-�.� calm . 27. 2-4 2- 7 Z 7 +& (9E431, 8. crzE LE y, 04- 28. zi e, !Co a«'E- 9. Gota � Gce_eke,,l Co6%� Sob's\ 29. - 10. / 2 1,44/L aegif GAO 7063/ 30. 4307- yof�� CC 11 OT a ��,C� fi=r 1�., « e6 3/ 31. r3d 4,41 12 J 3 041;2. `©ol to /bit` (S1 13. 9raP3 C° . 33. 14. 34. • 15. /�� 35. M 5,1\13 16. 7"-v,,,,,52:7:20 36. 17. b • 37. • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. 0 L(-'`' la;6,- A-6Si Q '1--/4(7 , 21. 2. l ef_._._ .-4 /5-6 a J eC.-�.� 22. w r'..�,e--..--(A,23. 4• -- V( • / 4 /lam/.5 ,ter 24. 5. aeldL.i4 (WS/ .2.34/0 JO '1--h ate__ 25. 4 6. 7. 27. 7 8. V `9,0 i8. " ,c' ‘4OV1c30 , 9. r. EVES) 29. 10. `3o', �iauCEr 0 Coy t �"< 30. �o��ZG��QZr�� 11. 31. 12. • 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. c PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS , r 1. / /,S'z Z l7`— /I ,e___ 21. c.,••!--. -',!,,,,,,,,„„ -191c; 641,1,1k1-1/4-14-.' ',,t,--,A_ . 2. I ,:' c-�L : t:z t L 'r (% < ' ' d(, (4 22. 1-,._, -ri. — /, ,',2.0 /t` ��(, 3 /. G J`,/,�t1%� Z2-•Fr - /7771 3.c--- ' (o 4,,i_944A/0 5.-:?I4 . ,,t,„.4, 4. ' '._P' /. 2 0 " ei,4- 24. /,,.,�,7 ,1(-'-',t4 _ '=.' 2 j >',i`'{ �r.,:�� 5. /.4..„) lc. /3 2-7 sr 25. . .h.. LztIo ,3 ST r. .c 7 -----.-. 6. 26- $•✓,,t'' -/j '..�/b S-O / e 7. �� r J 10 �'CL ,1•7,2_„,2 <,7•7..). - 8. // ,'�' d--//g(1/-1z;<� J.'� 28. - cb7 9- /1 J,i ��' :TY,� , t 6�,7/- �z -4// 29. N - Nov a 10. J /.- ' -',2 30. r- 11. ./) -3 771/AK 4lne•Qq y 31. .,r 12. _ ;; .( ii1' ,r ,, ;'% • / / Y or '(/' � - 2. 13. -,Z v Af.J/�jC._ 33. 14. i _ ,_/' 1 /, ,l 4. 15./ a',1c.,:,I..;�-1,2.L r, n, /12 L' -:.)' 7 J` i%,: 35. 16. bX64' 36. 17. ..L, . / - /3 37. l VI2 18. '� (,-3 XA4 9 ( O3��,.._ 8. (I/,, ' 19.( r;( Jzyd1 ,,e,:,J -54/,_6-7/. .„-7,,z.„-.1/.4,/.C 39. Xi 26.- - 4cZ,�,C � 667 vci 4v 40. ,..y...4...,c.....1,6,1 PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. ? -3o Pi; oh, 21. 2. Jo L 4 . 2"A4- 5)3 1 CP..,w 22. nrr�3. c. ✓ �� —S �� // ' 23. 1/ /600 4 i� c ,3 •'4ee- � �� • 5. ��/® r.�, 25. 6. 26. 56764 7. N(' A °1'. 27. Nov ' 980 8. o RECEIvaD 28. c— ed 9. .;��4 1O \\' 29. - 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. 4-- 3`117 z 3 Sf &raft, 21. .�- 2. - dx, /04. 7 7z-1,7'7 22. 3. GJitA" - rQ/o'L5Q"J V2 3. 4. �� ,r�r� ,5/a/z, �d Qp 24. 5. 6,567 25. 6. o NOV 1980 26. c8 RE C1c",1 -Z 7. <12. 1 ar41rt kL''reSeo' 27. _dbG 8. 28. 9. 29. 10. _ 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. 14. 34. • 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37: • 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY ' OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS . 1. O71- - , 21. • 2. � �4(� l �/ ` . 22. y ij 3. it .s/ :�..;'�;�,r�: 1j ��a 1� tit l" ,/ 23. 4. r -� 24. 5. >' f�'OV 1E80 25. RECEIVED 6. ‘1,."4 CEu 1l 26. c.)'8)^, 7. l ceOZ0 27. 8. 28. 9. 29. 10. 30. 11. 31. 12. 32. 13. 33. • 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. • 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. . PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. _/��:(-rei /?,/3 2G- 7"/IV' CT 21. r` 2. A. L. ( 22.'15/11-4. �<�L�-�✓�t /.Z _ 24. 5. /�-/ l _�. �� 25. I 6. ( __*-__ / 26. 7._ ! itz.,' 27. 8. , / < �//�� j1=!`<' �, 28. , brie-- z4. sr. ,: - 9. ��J.. 29.•///7./. 10. /; S, r , 30. 11. 31. 12. te_;: 3,O\I g80 \ 32. fz.SCSINLIS) .11' 13. 33. 14. dc-e.'2? "- �� 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. • 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. r <,sai((>,c 7�`�tir- rv-ly21 2.C tt,04 LKFri,"8 I &I J(17) ,-t4.1.• 22. 3. C; t �- I7:31&' 3 CYtL 6\,,,T)),(23. 4. , �` � 1 W�. -� ,, '72.5 10:= � 24. .4O7 25. 6. / >>i� al ! r.- /.�:� ✓rte/t�. = ' 26. 7.* _ Jg/ec OL' E/J/>Y 11c&- 27. 8. l-'>/ • /7/1 efi ,(26'oi 8• 9. 29. 10. 30.6 78 11. � A a0'j ` �1 31. ilA� CS.7 R��p`°L.tQ11°� ..y 12. 6b�y- '2". ‘ 32. ,ate 13. • • - - 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. • 19. 39. 20. 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. , L�.f'� /7,2,4.3&Lc, 21. j ,C) &o 3i 2. i.'1. 6?-6r ,3%5() _ 22. �� L.L t'Lt c/ L Fi 3. /(/ , /y,2 JVV o/ 23. 4 5. L� ,��, f�� "7 �� - (,� 25. /V/ , 7 6. / � =�- :? : / -5,`, 26. 1J26 2( --(;))/e: /4' /SO/ // 27. 8. /- ,1 i, __,/'Y��6.,) 7 28. 9. 29. 10. 30. ,) 780 11. ,O`L 7e 31. 10195 12. • •>. 32. 71, �j Viatia 13. l� , �, 33. 14. 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. _✓9j ,( S yt 1 i C.Pir�tt j ,4e< 1) PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL.AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. 4./.117064.? L, gig.7 -2 Z'=ejS r 21. 2. ii -,8L u,-6 1/ /r1 - 2_2 25•4- 22. 3. iU 1CtAtA. '-1-4 fz1R .2l.';,- 120C g 23. 4. r'1! A /93e7 2-,-- "iv,.. 24./ ,_ft ' 25. 6. /, 1 lgO'J/71-A 47 26. 70: .) ) i (,, '(, ii( i, t, ) ((r.i, -__Y 'i-1)_l) ',/ 27. 8.��.e:/�e= . .A4,( IrC�.� 28. 9. (7_,646.-, a-, ,7/46.1 LC��;Z�� 29. \ 1 1O r/0 30. L 11/. �4�, i ' .§/'1 413 U . 31. 9UL#J7 /1 12./ ��l -Z o/E C4icnve --4g, 32. r /7/ 7 /r q ✓IZL(l 13. X &'. -jr i 33. - dbbi30j.., 14. 3/1 3E / )e i, 4. 4. ; r� 15. //C 35. 0 s `,cam ts' L 1O ` O : 2529 0 • /5 � �,'�'7�`�C��A�16.)1 / C STY Orr 36. 7'/ d - - ( Nv-, 17. / ) 37. J( /6 a /'/e2u e.J 18: ✓ 38. /76C c_? 'c Cc_5/• #tea 19. al_z_;- 7. //0e-( '�l ft.J,LJ=y (70 Mcs,3)39. 20. `i.,.a r G v I (�� (/ rQ 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. G `/,�� ,�5I 21. , 33 kb . 2 /(i2rotic____ 35)/5(14,p,,,,,,a6) 22. ' . i b Le_- -3-33 3 L I`Tv c 7 r 3. r�� .� ,,,.0 Vii/ - '7a 23. co 3 :37-'''--61,-04. , } c�7 f%/`e ,92 24. / (((3 c.,2 3zJGt 5. �� 7�.. 4w5 ( - 25. /�,•i\r' &/5-6,�9 / J L7------- /(/'2/ �/tr�'✓v Crl , NO�I1980 G�1 26. `� 1-3 !l�® Gt„ N Ylcl�CcGo� _„Y'.�-6- & a cc'ezlQ 02 �g� 8. ii�(11.2W-P L d6w7e>,-, J/,-rd,.G KGs 28. 10 - �r �h g1- '/ 3O.11. ��/.3-". f_ _ 31.01"12.' i //% - ya-d 4.,,(,„4 6 32. 13._‘'( (-6/ a u . -9)1G. �C' ,.5--V /(1/733. 14. (--et Z' ,2-3/7-z-1 --24,11-,g4_4. 15. rP5// 31a 35. _ J r) 16. ` / ' . ..3/-.�7/ J t'<?-/A.,.� ``2 36. 17. ,t64 2/e• 2333 "AliAg.c444(} . 18. A44 39/5' ,140`L-,O/. 19. 44 C `(.c G t, .41§ef e `C 20 ST =-�.�C�.i..4� �iL 9i -A ve 40. PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY, HEREBY PETITION ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL_AGENCIES TO GIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY TO CONSTRUCT A WASTEWATER TREATMENT LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM AT SITE 1 LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 3 MILES EAST OF GILL, COLORADO. NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS 1. 9 • -7 V-.2 &A/S2 g2,9+ 21. ',i 1 - - /1-1//a'( - 7- •, - (b);,e i ', i, ( 1 35 U cifG tgd _ 3. /V �.e/ --- 9 0,d7/. /L:a* 3. f 2 g 2 - z 2 ST,2'7r 4. ' '7 1;•4.�� 4. ; �` V .5'i/ 9 1 5./ 7 / 4I3L )2, 1 • br7 5. f .V 20 '/c) 6. _ 26. , J G 0 ' ), , Co// Yet { 4A. C f 7. /akdd P, .eti /J r8 33 61,4._/e* 27. 7T-e-ia .l 6f-vL/ 706-27 ,4_e_ 6%.t., 8. `.c -h/ '. ,c2 / 7 ? zie ,/'t ✓-,_-=%/ -�� /-A-,4 -?2 , 2? • i / & c/ ( 37J`v�D• /' 4/1 /7/53 n�&`'L AiiUVi I1f. (,L` Wt/, -JCL/J act, C C4 31.c1--t- ,65-029 iktdg• • O��12. CAM . _'� - I /l /"L-Y6 E1��/32. a s. . 13. moo`;)••' `� /.4 e--?-, 1/7 /7 F 2' 33. c�/ /�- --1 �-0-2-ri 14. 31(c) ----7 ,v-7 34. , f� ,_ 2 -Z 2lG e' G`\7 I 15. / >y, x-3-0 _7: / ' 33. /4S 15'677c.' 16. ,Oz,/�^-Le a,7�,_., �°s-'�'7 e.,._ -/-222,p36. ��' �� • ik NOV1980 ',� 17. Zz t-flit� ,/,47 lC,(37. PO REGEIV D ��' �/ coin toms— i-g/38. : , Ek?i2,t2132,' 19. , ___ 1 /l/ �l/ / IP 39. 20. N rti7 `,.1.4c, l l lc) `1(v - J` -1{., R1l e 40. PROJECT TEAM MEETING NO. 19 September 19, 1980 IN ATTENDANCE: Ga t- ry Fortner, Weld County Planning Department Tom Honn, Weld County Planning Department Bill Hargett, City of Greeley John DiFalco, City of Greeley Mark Rybus , City of Greeley John Gauthiere, City of Greeley Dave Winger, City of Greeley Bill Kolly, ARIX Dick Huwa, ARIX • Gary Fortner and Tom Honn of the Weld County Planning Department were present to coordinate the Site Application and Special Use Permit procedures with the City staff and consultants. Mr. Fortner said that basically the Site Applica- tion is processed under the County's Special Use Permit procedure. The County Planning Commission reviews the Application to see if it is in conformity with the County Plan and makes comments which are then submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. It is anticipated that the Board of County Commissioners will probably sign off on the Application in conformity with the Planning Com- mission's recommendation. Should the Planning Commission make a negative recom- mendation, the City Council would need to overrule the decision. The review process requires a minimum of 30 days. As part of the review process, the County Planning staff seeks input from various referral agencies. Mr. Fortner and Mr. Honn said they would supply the City with a list of these agencies so that the City could contact them directly and any questions that might arise could be answered more quickly. John Gauthiere noted that delays can be encountered if there is no intergovern- mental agreement and Mr. Fortner suggested that the City start looking into the matter as it can be a very involved and lengthy process. It was decided that ARIX should meet with Chuck Cunliffe of the Weld County Planning Department so that he could review the draft of the Special Use Permit and point out what further information might be needed. Mr. Cunliffe also could outline the timetables to shorten the process as much as possible. The following schedule was decided on: September 22 Site Application completed and mailed to all reviewing agencies September 26 Special Use Permit completed and submitted to County October 7 Weld County Planning Commission receives a copy of Special Use Permit Application Project Team Meeting No. 19 September 19, 1980 Page Two October 21 Project Team makes presentation to Weld County Planning Commission November 4 or 5 Weld County Planning Commission acts on _Special Use Permit November 10 Weld County Commissioners act on Site Application Mr. Fortner noted that it might be very helpful to include a summary of the proposal with the Special Use Permit application which would aid the Planning Commission in understanding the project. The Special Use Permit will be reviewed at the September 26th Project Team meeting. Any necessary corrections will then be made and it should be submitted to the County that day. Mr. Fortner said that if any questions arise at the October 21st meeting of the Planning Commission, the City and consultants should be ready to move quickly to answer them so that they can be answered satisfactorily by the November 4th meeting. Bill Hargett asked if the City needed to submit a letter to the County requesting to be placed on the agenda for the October 21st meeting. Mr. Honn said they could set it up on the basis of the verbal request as long as all requirements of the County Attorney are met. The City staff then reviewed the Special Use Permit and Site Application mate- rials with Bill Kelly and Dick Huwa. John DiFalco pointed out that a letter is needed from the State which says that they will enter into a ground lease with the City because the City cannot condemn the portion of land controlled by the State. Mr. Rybus and Mr. DiFalco felt that the City should move as quickly as possible in obtaining options on the land. ARIX was asked to check with the County and find out what is the minimum legal document needed. They were also to check on a possible waiver of the application fees. �q-�2�2Q,��/� 7 1°80 ti SEP �� RECEIVE® Cosasstu® RESOLUTION WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Moved by Bette Kountz that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it therfore resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the following be adopted: Authorize the Department of Planning Services Staff to sign the City of Greeley Site Application for Outfall Sewer Lines for approval. Notion seconded by Jerry Kiefer. Vote: For Passage Against Bette Kountz Jerry Kiefer Wilbur Wafel Don Billings Bob Halleran Bob Ehrlich Fred Otis Irma White Chuck Carlson The Chairman declared the Resolution passed. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Dianne J. Reed , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 2, 1980 and recorded in Book No. VII of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 3rd day of December , 19 80 . /d1O/YVYI Q 1p • Secretary 'COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTE (Submit One Set W WQ-3-A ' Water Quality Control Division All Copies Attac...._) 4210 East 11th Ave. ; Denver, Colo. 80220 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES AND SMALL LIFT STATIONS Required if: A) Serving MORE than Twenty Persons and MORE than 2,000 GPD of flow and/or B) Lift station having less than 20,000 GPD capacity. Applicant: City of Greeley, Colorado Address: Civic Center Complex Phone: 353-6123 Name and Address of Consulting Engineer: ARIX, A Professional Corporation, 2021 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone: 330-2749 A. Size of Lift Station: gpm B. Sizes and approx. lengths of Sewer Lines: Two 30" inch each 44,500 ft. Inch ft. inch ft. inch ft. C. Average flow when fully developed: 12.0 mgd. D. Will any structure serviced by the collection facilities be located in a 100 year flood plain? N/A Pressure Line E. Connection: accept flow from proposed This sewer system will RJaRsmaxIm a 66 inch nch JuoistAnN sewer owned by City of Greeley and discharge to a new proposed treatment facility Munic. or District which has/IiagxRatt approved this connection RR Approved up co le ion of the project Date Disapproved ignature and Title F. Treatment: . Treatment Entity City of Greeley, Colorado has the capacity and agrees to treat this sewa ) Yes No (Subject to construction of new Date treatment facilities-Site C4y r• Signature and Title application in process) G. Comments of Governmental Authority (City or County) : This o ct (meet (dos not meet) our planning requirements for the serve area. P j q • Reco A r al \v4 Disapproval No Comment `7/t0,/t 5 '� p ,�In' (Qjl l!1.0 1 S'�(� O,„te ea- c k�ri dL V � !!�/ /� }�7rtu� ppp, Signature and Titl �,_C Applicant's Signatur(- "4�e" 9/22/80 s Date Mailed to Commenting Authority Copies must be sent to local health department and Council of Governments. If over 50,000 gpd, also send to local and regional planning agency and to any other city or town within three miles of the proposed facilities. (Enclose copies of postal receipt showing copies were sent by Certified Mail .) I . District Engineer comments and recommendation: Date Signature J. Commission Action: The Water Quality Control Commission (Approved) (Disapproved) this application on . Chief, Field Services Section Date Date Interested persons may comment to the Water Quality Control Commission. The application will be considered in not less than 30 days from the date mailed to comrnntinq authority. • COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water Quality Control Division 421U East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD. CAPACITY APPLICANT: - City of Greeley, Colorado ADDRESS: Civic Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 PHONE: 353-6123 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ARIX A Professional Corporation, 2021 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80631 PHONE: 330-2749 A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage treatment plant 'on this particular site. This should include, but is not necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development of the site location and service area. Aerated lagoon, land application 2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: (Includes storage res. & center Type pivot sprinklers) GPD: 12,000,000 PE design Present PE (gal/day) capacity 120,000 to be served 66,000 ? Domestic: 86% % Industrial : 14% 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 10-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations. (b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes. None (c) 1-mile radius : habitable buildings , location of potable water wells , and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent will be discharged: To Crow Creek 3.5 miles above confluence with South • - (Watercourse) Platte River Subsurface disposal : • Land: Land application .prior to discharg( to Crow Creek Evaporation: Other: Crow Creek unclassifif " State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) :- South Platte-B, water, - - 7`'5: Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this t- project? Yes • • The proposed service area • - • includes the present City 6'. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? growth areas which are zon, Present zoning of site area? Agricultural - " - • - • - ' agricultural Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Agricultural 1Q-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 1 - 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? None (name and address of supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion Empire res. intake canal 4 miles from discharge into Crow Creek (name and address of user) Bijou Irrigation Co. , 35941 U.S. Highway 34, Kersey, Colorado 80644 8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? See the attached site map for property ownership Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility. 10. Estimated project cost: $20,164,000 (1979 Costs-Lagoon, storage and land application) Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility? City of Greeley 11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. None (Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? No If so, what precautions are being taken? Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources? Yes - outside 100 yr. flood plain If so, what is that designation? Zone C (Areas of minimal flooding) Insurance flood study community panel #080266 0675 A 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval . - The treatment system will provide an advanced level of treatment, whereas the present system provides only minimal secofldary, with limited growth potential . The Greeley system will ultimately be a regional system treating wastewater from the Evans Sanitation District and Hill-N-Park Mobile Home development, in addition to the City of Greeley system. (Other information given on Sheet No. 1 of the drawings.) The project is in harmony with national goals to maximize resource utiliztion. WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 - Information regarding lift stations : 1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following sxbribbi accei load: Population Equivalent Peak Hydraulic (MGD) 22.0 to be served: 120,000 2. Is the site located in a 100.year flood plain? No If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3. Where will the overflow be discharged? Standby power and pumping will be provided, if overflow still occurred it would flow to the Poudre River. 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: City of Greeley, Civic Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 (Proposed Facility at Weld Co. Rds. 61 and 62, 3 miles east of Gill , Colorado) 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the facility to 100 % of hydraulic and 100 % of organic capacity. (to pump flow from entire City) C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or questions, please call X388c myc cmAxxxX Bc 320-8333, Extension 3459 Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and Sewer District) Board o County Commissioners // 5_(17 \/ Chicle ,l'• Loca ea 1 th�A i ty (1 /County Planning Authority Regional Planning Agency Council of Government State Geologist Date: 9lYko Signature of Applicant District Engineer Action: Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : • Date: Signature w11-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 - COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (Submit One Set Wi WQ-3-A Water quality Control Division All Copies Attach=u, ' 4210 East 11th Ave. ; Denver, Colo. 80220 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES AND SMALL LIFT STATIONS Required if: A) Serving MORE than Twenty Persons and MORE than 2,000 GPD of flow and/or B) Lift station having less than 20,000 GPD capacity. Applicant: City of Greeley, Colorado Address: Civic Center Complex Phone: 353-6123 Name and Address of Consulting Engineer: ARIX, A Professional Corporation, 2021 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone: 330-2749 A. Size of Lift Station: gpm B. Sizes and approx. lengths of Sewer Lines: Two 30" inch each 44,500 ft. inch ft. inch ft. inch ft. C. Average flow when fully developed: 12.0 mgd. D. Will any structure serviced by the collection facilities be located in a 100 year flood plain? N/A Pressure Line E. Connection: accept flow from proposed This sewer system will RoRRggXxXm a 66inch motatAms sewer owned by City of Greeley and discharge to a new proposed treatment facility Munic. or District which has/kaxxRRk approved this connection OR Approved upon completion of the project. Date Disapproved Signature and Title F. Treatment: Treatment Entity City of Greeley, Colorado has the capacity and agrees to treat this sewage X Yes No (Subject to construction of new Date treatment facilities-Site Signature and le application in process) G. Comments of Governmental Authority (City or County) : This project (meets) (does not meet) our planning requirements for the service area. Recommend: Approval Disapproval No Comment 11 '/1.•" Date Xt.*Sig ature an ' 1 H. Applicant's Signatu 9/22/80 Date Mailed to Commenting Authority Copies must be sent to local health department and Council of Governments. If over 50,000 gpd, also send to local and regional planning agency and to any other city or town within three miles of the proposed facilities. (Enclose copies of postal receipt showing copies were sent by Certified Mail .) I . District Engineer comments and recommendation: Date Signature J. Commission Action: The Water Quality Control Commission (Approved) (Disapproved) this application on . Chief, Field Services Section Date Date Interested persons may comment to the Water Quality Control Commission. The application will be considered in not less than 30 days from the date mailed to commenting authority. PP I'-gm H ' COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEAL1 Water ,Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF: A) SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD. CAPACITY • APPLICANT: City of Greeley, Colorado ADDRESS: Civic Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 PHONE: 353-6123 Consulting Engineer's Name and Address: ARIX A Professional Corporation, 2021 Clubhouse Drive, Greeley, Colorado 80631 PHONE: 330-2749 A. Information regarding new sewage treatment plant: 1 . Briefly. describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage treatment plant -on this particular site. This 'should include, but is not necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development of the site location and service area. Aerated lagoon, land application 2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: (Includes storage res. & center Type pivot sprinklers) GPD: 12,000,000 PE design Present PE lgal/day) capacity 120,000 to be served 66,000 % Domestic: 86% % Industrial : 14% 3. Location of facility: Attach a map of the area which includes the following: (a) 10-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations. (b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes. None (c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells, and an approximate indication of the topography. 4. Effluent will be discharged: To Crow Creek 3.5 miles above confluence with South (Watercourse) Platte River - . - Subsurface disposal : Land: Land application :prior to discharge to Crow Creek Evaporation: Other: Crow Creek unclassifie State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : South Platte-B? waters 5. Will a State'or-'-Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this • project? Yes - - - . The proposed service area I - - includes the present City p 6'. What is the present zoning for the proposed service area? growth areas which are zone Present zoning of site area? Agricultural ' - - ---agricultural Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Agricultural WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 1 - 7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water supply intake? None (name and address of supply) What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point of diversion Empire res. Intake canal 4 miles from discharge into Crow Creek (name and address of user) Bijou Irrigation Co. , 35941 U.S. Highway 34, Kersey, Colorado 80644 8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department 9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? See the attached site map for property ownership Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to construct the proposed facility. 10. Estimated project cost: $20.164.000 (1979 Costs-Lagoon, storage and land application) Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the facility? City of Greeley 11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. None . c ` (Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? No' If so, what precautions are being taken? Has the flood plain been •designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Department of Natural Resources? Yes - outside 100 yr. flood plain If so, what is that designation? Zone C (Areas of minimal flooding) Insurance flood study community panel #080266 0675 A 13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval . The treatment system will provide an advanced level of treatment, whereas the present system provides only minimal secondary, with limited growth potential . The Greeley system will ultimately be a regional system treating wastewater from the Evans Sanitation District and Hill-N-Park Mobile Home development, in addition to the City of Greeley system. (Other information given on Sheet No. 1 of the drawings.) The project is in harmony with national goals to maximize resource utilization. • • WQ-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 - -— w �� -- -- --- ®„ Information regarding lift stations: 1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following xbcbbbix1 Population Equivalent Peak Hydraulic (MGD) 22.0 to be served: 120,000 2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? No If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken. 3. Where will the overflow be discharged? Standby power and pumping will be provided, if overflow still occurred it would flow to the Poudre River. 4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: City of Greeley, Civic Center Complex, Greeley, Colorado 80631 (Proposed Facility at Weld Co. Rds. 61 and 62, 3 miles east of Gill , Colorado) 5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the facility to 100 % of hydraulic and 100 ? of organic capacity. (to pump flow from entire City) C. If the facility will be located on or adjacent to a site that is owned or managed by a Federal or State agency, send the agency a copy of this application. D. Recommendation of governmental authorities: Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans including the 201 , 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or questions, please call X3884,0myc arc 4 o o(Mk 320-8333, Extension 3459 Recommend Recommend No Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and Sewer Dist•ic )/irBoar1-E-1210 i< d of County C:mmissioners Local Health Authority City/County Planning Authority Regional Planning Agency Council of Government State Geologist Date: Signature o App icant District Engineer Action: / Recommend Approval : Recommend Disapproval : • Date: Signature WQ-3(rev. 1/78-40) - 3 - THE CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO . , 1980 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN ASSURANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GREELEY AND THE WITWER FAMILY RELATIVE TO THE GREELEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT RESERVOIR AND LAGOON TO BE CONSTRUCTED EAST OF THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF GREELEY. WHEREAS , it is the intention of the City of Greeley to construct, maintain, and operate a Wastewater Treatment Facility, including a reservoir and lagoon, to be located in Section 31, Township 6 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P .M. and in Section 6 , Township 5 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M. ; and WHEREAS, the Witwer family, owners and operators of the S.L.W. Ranch located near the proposed reservoir and lagoon, have asked the City for assurances that said Wastewater Treatment Facility will not violate applicable air quality and water quality standards nor materially increase nor materially decrease the subsurface water in, on, or under any adjacent or nearby land, specifically lands owned or leased by the Witwer family; and WHEREAS, the Witwer family has indicated that if given such assurances, they will not actively oppose the construction of said Wastewater Treatment Facility; and WHEREAS, it is considered to be in the best interest of the people of the City of Greeley to grant assurances to the Witwer family. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO: 51/ Section 1 . The Mayor of the City of Greeley is hereby authorized to execute Assurance Agreement designated attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference . Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Greeley is hereby authorized to obligate the City to all terms and conditions of said Assurance Agreement and to receive the Assurances from the Witwer family contained therein. PASSED AND ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1980. ATTEST: THE CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO By City Clerk Mayor APPROVED: City Manager City Attorney re 6 7 8,9,7 , 4(‘• frz, Gov 1ga v13 w scsx ft �t1a�;p`,9C�Oos ,57 I: FORM A ASS'_'.:ANCES The City of Greeley (herein the City) and the family of Clara and Stow L. Witwer (herein referrred to as the Witwer family) hereby enter the following Assurances Agreement regarding a waste water treatment reservoir and lagoon (herein the facility) to be located in Section 31, Township 6 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M. and in the North Half of the North Half of Section 6, Township 5 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M. I. SPECIFIC ASSURANCES A. Air Quality. The City assures that neither the facility nor its operations connected therewith shall cause pollution of the air that exceeds the allowable state and federal air quality standards. E. Water Quality. The City assures that the facility and its operations connected therewith shall not lower the quality of any stream, subsurface water, ditch or surface water below the allowable state and federal water quality standards. C. Underground Water Quantity. The City assures that the facility and its operations connected therewith shall neither materially increase, nor materially decrease the subsurface water in, on, or under any adjacent or nearby land. II. ENFORCEMENT A. The assurances given by the City shall inure to the benefit of and may be enforced only by Clara and Stow L. Witwer, their lineal descendants and their spouses, or the S.L.W. Ranch Company, a Colorado Corporation, so long as one hundred percent (100%) of the stock of said • corporation is owned by one or more of the above-referenced members of the Witwer family. �' /j B. Not cI- to the City. Prior to conmencet.ent of any liti- u_ticn alleging a violation of the within Assurances, reasonable notice will be provided to the City by written notice to the City Manager or Mayor. III. WITWER FAMILY ASSURANCES The Witwer family (as defined in II A hereof) prefer another site for the facility, but in order to provide consideration for the within agreement, assure the City that they will not exercise any administrative remedy or commence any civil action to prevent the granting of all necessary local, state and federal permits for the design, construction and initial operation of the facility at the above location. This Agreement is binding when executed by both parties hereto. Dated: WITWER FAMILY By Stow L. Witwer CITY OF GREELEY By George W. Hall, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Stow L. Witwer, Jr. n1,.‘,10 789 Attorney for Witwer Family ►\`L !_ I V 103 w � vVo N Weld Cou��9 John P. DiFalco r-`'O ssuit.b WOOS City Attorney 'C'442e2�Z02��Q�+ -2- .� r- . _ S -r + s. 6 s t (_-,, • \)`,CL'-r.\- i (. r . , \'• Id J l; i 1;•,:,„-1.-„4, k fri ty i_________ ),..J' Z- J CO �;�7� °T' ``N. `-' �1 • t).:?/1 J V ` ,.. ./- ->-9-a ?- � ) ,,..- ', ,..-.-pc., oadao1o:) A iH 3ti', 41 , _:„.., .. \ , CU ,- •—1 Cd 0 bb CO 4-1 O O >.1 b O A I O 0 N ,C O c •rI r-I CD r-I GA ri • N •r1 J-1 4J P4 ' 5 a/ . • . -,,4u,,, j I"I 1 II /fill z IO cc , :fi' ,? ; , .- y.� J��`Q' 1 , �/? ��@� O��P X04\ ,6,1 Hello