HomeMy WebLinkAbout810552.tiff 7 .__ . . -. _.---- . .-----
•
� k t
t
... _ ^ "" z
` S•t"i "`rt "` a
t
4"
,-" _ s •9 x 'r- _ 'y
INTAKE/CLASSIFICATION GRANT
FINAL REPORT
.' . .•
ti r
r\
ti
' , ,
I T �
' - f 'may• ;- ..
•
•
.
t ' .r e . `c rP.y,� r. iru `.�'lyey
wT1.3 MINTY
981-- fti
�REELEIG CQ,LQ�
PART 1 - NARRATIVE REPORT
COLORADO DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SUBGRANT NARRATIVE REPORT
fubgrantee: Project Number: Date:
Weld County, Colorado 77-AGE-10C-(1)-Ce-119
Proje ct Title: Type of Report: Sequence Number:
Intake/Classification Unit Extension• (5th Quarter)
Progress Final X
Protect Duration: Report for Quarter Ending :
From 10/1/78 To 12/31/80 Mar June Sept[ 1 Dec X
NOTE: Prepare this report according to the instructions on the reverse side. Requests
for funds may be denied unless this report is complete and filed on time as
required by the Division of Criminal Justice Administrative Guide.
BEGIN REPORT HERE:
The Intake/Classification Grant has been in existence for two and a half years and
is now terminated. However, as a result of the patience and determination on the
part of all individuals and agencies involved intake/classification services will
continue to be provided in the Weld County Jail . The Programs Unit of which the
Intake/Classification section is a part, is now meeting nearly all of the objectives
set forth in the grant proposal . Despite the many changes and problems encountered
over the two and a half years , the Intake/Classification section has not only sur-
vived but has thrived becoming an essential asset to the jail 's functioning. Con-
tinued enthusiasm and support from the County and administration will be necessary
to keep the Unit functioning at the same high level we presently maintain.
This final report attempts to summarize the developments and changes of both years
of the grant. However, the initiators of the first year grant are no longer employed
by the Sheriff' s Department. This writer has worked under the second year grant,
and every attempt has been made to provide as complete a report as possible.
Continue on plain b y d pages ^.
Si ture or rot - t h rector >> •� 8ture .r . i g Urtica
typed iName `and Title Bill Hardgrave, Director of Correctional
Typ Na e d isle
Revised 'l2/i8. All previous editions are obsolete.
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
1. "Establish the Weld County Classification/Referral Project. " Not only is the
project operating smoothly in the Weld County Jail , but we are meeting the
standards of the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and
Goals for Classification of Offenders. Listed below are the applicable stand-
ards or goals set by the Commission followed by a commentary on our progress in
meeting these objectives.
A. "Recognizing that corrections is now characterized by a lack of knowledge
and deficient resources, and that classification systems therefore are more
useful for assessing risk and facilitating the efficient management of
offenders than for diagnosis of causation and prescriptions for remedial
treatment, classification should be designed to operate on a practical
level and for realistic purposes, guided by the principal that:
1. "No offender should be kept in a more secure condition or status than
his potential risk dictates. "
Generally, each arrestee is placed in G-Intake from the Holding area
the day after his court appearance. Exceptions are made if the arrest-
ee exhibits violent, abusive, psychotic, suicidal or abnormal sexual
behaviors. These problematic people are placed in G-Max (or sometimes
kept in Holding) where they can be easily observed for future evalua-
tion. G-Intake on the other hand is a temporary housing pod where the
inmate is placed until classification procedures are complete (inter-
- views , security observation , etc. ) . He is then moved to the second
floor with the general population (refer to Appendix I "Flowchart of
Inmate Movement").
Female arrestees are placed directly into the women' s pod, A Pod. A
woman displaying problematic behavior may be isolated in one of two
more secure cells , A-Max, should her behavior dictate the need to sep-
arate her from the other women.
2. "No offender should receive more surveillance or "help" than he requires. "
Groups , programs and counseling are offered to all inmates with partic-
ipation being strictly voluntary unless court ordered. Every inmate is
assigned to a "contact counselor" , the person to whom situational ques-
tions or problems should be addressed as the need arises. This counselor
is also available for individual counseling when it is requested. Coun-
seling is sometimes recommended and encouraged for certain individuals,
but never required.
B. "The classification system should be developed under the management concepts
discussed in Chapter 13 and issued in written form so that it can be made
public and shared. " It should specify:
1. "The objectives of the system based on a hypothesis for social re-inte-
gration of offenders , detailed methods for achieving the objectives ,
and a monitoring and evaluation mechanism to determine whether the
objectives are being met. "
-1-
As we will be seeing later (Objective III) , referrals to outside agenc-
ies are made to inmates in an attempt to re-integrate these individuals
socially. However, as of now, there is no monitoring or evaluation
mechanism to determine the level of participation in or effectiveness
of these agencies once the offender is released.
2. "The critical variables of the typology to be used. "
The basic variables used in the classification procedure have been out-
lined (refer to Appendix II "Intake/Classification Screen and Flowchart
for the SPSS Package") . These include homosexual , paranoid , emotionally
unstable, suicidal and psychotic tendencies as well as their incarcera-
tion history.
3. "Detailed indicators of the components of the classification categories. "
As may deduced from Appendix II , an inmate is assigned to a pod only
after the consideration of a number of variables concerning that indi-
vidual . Following is a specific breakdown of the classification categor-
ies.
A - Women
A-Max - Problematic women
g - Younger in age (25 years or less) , inexperienced in
jail settings (longest single period of incarceration
equals 0-30 days , the number of times incarcerated
equals 0-2 , and the total time spent in jail equals
0-90 days) , somewhat suicidal , paranoid, emotionally
• unstable or schizoid, likely to be victimized
C - Relatively nonproblematic, somewhat experienced in
jails (the longest single period of incarceration
equals 30-90 days, the number of times incarcerated
equals 2-4, the total time incarcerated equals 60
days to 1 year) , older than 25
p - Older in age (25 or older) , maturity, emotionally
stable, sentenced, experienced in jails (the longest
period of incarceration equals more than 90 days ,
the number of times incarcerated equals 4 or more,
and the total amount of time incarcerated equals a
year or more)
E - Work release pod
F - Trusty pod
G-Intake - Most arrestees are moved to Intake prior to permanent
placement in the general population (there are excep-
tions , of course) . Intake is used for observation
and evaluation.
G-Max - Special custody inmates (homosexual , extremely sui-
cidal , paranoid, emotionally unstable, psychotic or
schizoid, highly disruptive or protective custody for
the safety and security of himself or others)
4. "The structure (Committee, Unit, Team, etc. ) and the procedures for
balancing the decisions that must be made in programming, custody, per-
sonal security, and resource allocation. "
• -2-
Classification is a team effort. Although the screening interviews
are conducted on a one to one basis between the inmate and the counselor,
input from Security is solicited with regards to placement of certain
individuals. The classification counselor makes recommendations but
the final decision and approval comes from Security (either the Watch
Commander, Security Lieutenant, or the Lieutenant of Support Services) .
C. "The System should provide full coverage of the offender population , clearly
delineated categories, internally consistent groupings , simplicity, and a
common language. "
As stated previously, each inmate is assigned to a counselor once he is
moved to Intake. Ideally, the counselor makes contact with each inmate on
his/her case load once a week. This would provide "full coverage" , however,
this much contact with inmates is seldom possible given the counselors'
work loads . This problem is addressed in the "Problems Encountered" section
of this report. In general , though, inmates know where they stand. The Jail
Operations Manual , "Policies and Procedures" serves as a guide and "rule
book". Many of these policies are also stated in the Inmate Handbook which
is placed in each pod. It has also been suggested that the Inmate Handbook
be translated into Spanish for those inmates who do not speak English. We
are presently looking for a volunteer to take on this project.
D. "The system should be consistent with individual dignity and basic concepts
of fairness (based on objective judgments rather than personal prejudices) . "
Objectivity is strived for through the classification procedure. First, the
interview process itself involves two people. One counselor does the initial
intake interview, afterwards making evaluations and the pod recommendation
(see Appendix III "Intake Interview Form") . Four to five days later, having
been moved to Intake, the inmate is given a second interview by another coun-
selor who uses the same evaluation scale and also makes his/her recommenda-
tion for permanent placement (see Appendix IV "Second Interview Form") .
These two counselors then "compare notes" and together determine which pod
the inmate will best be suited. A single recommendation is made to Security,
who then makes the final decision.
E. "The system should provide for maximum involvement of the individual in
determining the nature and direction of his own goals , and mechanisms for
appealing administrative decisions affecting him. "
As stated in A.2, all inmates are invited to participate in the groups and
programs offered. Approximately 25-30% of the population attend groups and/
or individual counseling. With regard to classification, inmates often give
input as to their preference for placement. Their requests are considered
in conjunction with the standards and procedures of the classification
system. Inmates are also encouraged to use the Inmate Request/Complaint
Form (Appendix V) for voicing dissatisfaction. Each request/complaint is
dealt with on an individual basis and a response is given to the inmate.
The Inmate Council is another method for expressing concerns. Although in-
dividual personal needs are not generally discussed during an Inmate Council
meeting, there is an opportunity for group discussion regarding classifica-
tion. Inmates also have the right to appeal a disciplinary measure. Appeals
are handled by the Captain of the Jail .
-3-
F. "The system should be adequately staffed, and the agency staff should be
trained in its use. "
This has been an ongoing problem which is explained in more detail under
"Problems Encountered". Only one counselor is currently employed in the
Intake/Classification section (although the other counselors in the Pro-
grams Unit have been trained in classification procedures) , thus the basic
responsibility and work load fall on one person. Also, there has been no
formal training for the Security staff on the use of the classification
system. Both of these problems are addressed later.
G. "The system should be sufficiently objective and quantifiable to facilitate
research, demonstration, model building, intra-system comparisons , and
administrative decision-making. "
The SPSS analysis package will provide these services, however, it is not
functional for the Programs Unit yet. This too will be discussed in the
"Problems Encountered" section.
H. "The Correctional Agency should participate in or be receptive to cross-
classification research toward the development of a classification system
that can be used commonly by all correctional agencies. "
Visits have been made by past Project Directors to other correctional agen-
cies with the hope of sharing as well as learning. The present Project
Director (the Director of Correctional Programs) is also interested in this
exchange of information. He is planning to visit other correctional agen-
cies with the Lieutenant of Support Services.
In summary, Objective One has 'been achieved quite satisfactorily. Problems have
been encountered and they are being dealt with accordingly. The project is
operating smoothly and the needs of the inmates and the community are being met.
The following is a summary of the remaining objectives as numbered in the second
year grant. When necessary, and for clarification, objectives of both years of
the grants will be listed together. The following symbols indicate:
* - First year grant
** - Second year grant
*** - Both first and second year grant
OBJECTIVES
1. *"Classify on an ongoing basis an average daily inmate population of 75. "
**"Classify on an ongoing basis an average daily population of approximately
90-100 inmates. "
In reviewing the data, one is immediately aware of the increase the Weld County
Jail is experiencing in its average daily population.
-4-
CHARTS I
First Year Grant
Oct. '78 - Jan. '79 - Apr. X79 - July 779 - Total
Dec. ' 78 Mar. '79 June ' 79 Sept '79
Number of 825 1014 1050 1209 4098
Bookings
Avg. Daily
Population 75.67 88.3 78 73.3 78.8
by Quarter
Second Year Grant
Oct. ' 79 - Jan. '80 - Apr. '80 - July '80 - Oct. '80 - Cum.
Dec. ' 79 Mar. '80 June '80 Sept '80 Dec. '80 Totals
(Extension)
Number of 1156 1240 1352 1523 1346 6617
Bookings
Avg. Daily
Population 84.4 90.65 84.87 90. 22 98. 14 91.65
by Quarter
This growth, together with the reduction of Programs staff, has made it increas-
ingly difficult to keep up with the complete classification system (accomplishing
first and second interviews on all arrestees who remain longer than five days) .
However, the majority of arrestees are being classified through the system which
is as follows (refer to Appendix I ) .
A new arrestee is interviewed on the first working day after being booked. The
first interview serves two basic functions. One is to assess the needs of the
individual . When appropriate, referrals are made and counseling is done, part-
icularly if the arrestee plans on bonding out shortly. Another function of
the interview is to begin the evaluation process on the individual . Specifically,
we try to identify the special custody problems as soon as possible (suicidal ,
psychotic, violent, homosexual , etc. ) . Evaluations are reocrded (see Appendix
III) and a preliminary pod recommendation is made. If necessary, the individual
is placed in Max and/or administrative segregation for his own protection and/
or the safety and security of others. The arrestee usually goes to court that
afternoon for advisement and bond setting. If he makes bond we have no further
business with him unless community referrals are appropriate. If he does not
bond out by the following morning of his court appearance, he is moved to G-
Intake where he remains for four to five days. During that time a second inter-
view is completed by a counselor other than the one who did the first. The
second interview is more detailed and extensive than the first (Appendix IV) .
-5-
Specific questions are asked in order to collect useful data , and the groups
and programs offered in the Jail are explained. Again, an assessment is made.
Data received from the first and second interview is pooled, together with
information received from Security regarding the individual . These evaluations
are all used to determine pod placement. After receiving approval from the
Watch Commander, Lieutenant of Security, or the Support Services Lieutenant,
the inmate is moved to his assigned pod. Chart II illustrates the number of
second interviews completed during the second year of the grant. No statistics
concerning the number of second interviews done during the first year of the grant
are available. A short term study revealed that 85% of the people arrested
bond out within five days , thus , second interviews are not done until the inmate
has been in the jail for five days. Psychological testing also has been used
as an objective measure for classification, however, at this time few people
on the Programs staff feel qualified enough to interpret the test data reliably.
More training is needed in this area. As necessarily must be the case, the
classification system is flexible. Extenuating circumstances sometimes arise,
making the strict adherence to this procedure impossible. Therefore, each
inmate is considered on an individual basis and exceptions may be made. For
example, one circumstance encountered frequently is the lack of space in the
jail . Overcrowding is a problem that makes classification difficult from time
to time.
CHART II
Second Year Grant - (Oct._ '79 - Dec. '801
First Second Third Fourth Extended Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
Inmates re-
maining ng 173 175 177 197 183 905
longer than
5 days
Second 57 77 90 102 98 424
Interviews
Percentage
lbjective 33% 44% 51% 52% 53% 47%
ompleted
2. ***"Complete 1,200 initial intake interviews. "
The first interview is a relatively brief interview between the counselor and
the new arrestee before he goes to court. During the first year of the grant,
the classification team took on the responsibility of the interview. The team
consisted of a representative from Security, Medical and Classification. This
created problems. First, both Security and Medical found it difficult to spend
that much time of their morning in interviews. Second, arrestees were reluctant
to "open-up" with personal concerns when three people were present, one of
-6-
which being a uniformed officer. During the second year grant, it was decided
that a counselor conduct the interview himself/herself. This has proven to be
effective. As can be seen in Chart III , this objective has been completed
easily during the second year grant, once a clearly defined and accepted system
was established.
CHART III
First Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Total
Quarter Quarter - Quarter Quarter
Number of
Initial 81 159 228 369 837
Intake
Interviews
Percentage
Objective 7% 13% 19% 31% 70%
Completed
(of 1200)
Second Year Grant
T First Second Third Fourth Extended Total - Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
Initial
Intake 349 297 340 201 241 1428 2265
Interviews
Percentage
Objective 29% 25% 28% 17% 20% 119% 94%
Completed
(of 1200)
3. *"Provide 120 referrals to agencies other than Probation, Public Defender and
State Hospital ." **"Provide 200 referrals to community agencies providing post-
release services."
Referrals are made as the need presents itself, whether it be during an interview,
counseling session, or general pod contact. Agencies providing post-release
services include Job Corps, Human Resources , the Alcohol Rehabilitation and Re-
covery Center, Aims Community College, and the like. The first year grant assessed
the number of referrals to agencies both in-house and in the community "other
than probation, public defender and state hospital . " Referrals were abundant, so
-7-
the definitions were changed to exclude in-house services. Chart IV illus-
trates the fact that this objective has been met easily during both years of
the grant. One aspect of the objective has not been met however, and this is
the follow-up process. This problem is addressed later.
CHART IV
First Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Total
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter _
Number ofT--
Referrals
to Agencies
other than 168 141 265 238 812
Probation,
Pub. Def. ,
& St. Hos.
Percentage
Objective 140% 117% 220% 198% 675%
Completed
(of 120)
Second Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Extended Total Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
umber of
Referrals 39 82 89 89 17 316 1128
o Comm.
gencies
ercentage
bjective 20% 41% 45% 44% 8% 158% 352%
ompleted
(of 200) ]
4. Objective number four was deleted prior to the approval of the grant.
5. *"Provide pre-release planning to 100 inmates. " **"To provide pre-release planning
to 130 inmates. "
Problems with documentation of these statistics have occurred because of the various
-8-
interpretations of the counselors ' definitions of pre-release. During the
first year, a Life Skills program was initiated with great success. Instruc-
tion was provided in the areas of money management, job hunting skills , health
and other survival skills. Also, pre-release counseling was determined by
categories, depending on how long the session lasted. We have now divided
Life Skills into two separate categories , vocational counseling and health. A
public health nurse from the Weld County Health Department conducts a group
dealing with nutrition , human sexuality, stress reduction , and exercise. One
of our own counselors teaches vocational skills , such as resume writing , bal-
ancing a check book, job hunting, etc. with individuals who request it. Other
groups that deal with pre-release planning are:
AA - Alcoholics Anonymous is a very popular group. Counselors from that
organization initially came to the jail once a week to conduct a
meeting. The group became too large and a second meeting time was
established. The counselors now come to the jail twice a week.
ARRC (Alcoholic Rehabilitation and Recovery Center) - Located in Greeley,
the ARRC is a comprehensive alcoholic treatment center which provides
all services from detoxification through and including halfway house
treatment and outpatient care. Because our classification interviews
are designed to identify inmates experiencing difficulties with sub-
stance abuse, we become aware of the needs of alcoholics. A counselor
from ARRC conducts weekly meetings here in the jail . These groups
deal with education on alcoholism as well as the therapeutic issues of
changing abusive behavior. In return , we provide standard interviews
using forms established and provided by the state and federal agencies
governing ARRC. Occasionally the courts are cooperative in allowing
certain individuals to be released on specific nights to attend in-
dividual or group counseling zlt the center.
New Horizons - This program is an extension of the outpatient drug treatment
group located at the Weld County Community Mental Health Center. The
group is held in the jail every other week and conducted by a counselor
from the Mental Health Center.
GED (General Equivalency Diploma) - Aims Community College provides a Masters
level adult education specialist to work with inmates who desire their
GED. The instructor is here Monday through Thursday, 9:00 - 11 :00 a.m.
and works with the inmates individually preparing them to take the GED
test. Since June of 1978, when she first began coming to the jail ,
twenty-one inmates have taken the test with sixteen of them passing , or
approximately 76%.
Support Group - This group came about largely through the interest and efforts
of inmates. They requested that a group conducted by inmates be formed
in order to address personal issues. The following agreements have been
established by the "founders" of the group. 1) confidentiality is
essential in order to provide the needed trust and support from one
another, 2) consistent attendance is expected (committment) , 3) group
members are encouraged to deal with personal issues , 4) enrollment will
be limited to twelve. This group has been highly successful . In fact,
interest was high enough to form two support groups in order to accom-
modate everyone who desired to participate. Appendix I is a newspaper
-9-
article written about two inmates who were instrumental in the organ-
ization of the support group.
Between counseling sessions and groups that deal with pre-release concerns ,
Objective Number Five is increasingly easier to meet because of the arbitrary
number of 130 as stated in the grant.
•
CHART V
First Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Total
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter _
Number of
Pre-release 0 g 11 35 55
Planning
Sessions
Percentage
of 55%
Objective 0 9% 11% 35%
Completed
(of 100)
Second Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Extended Total Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter uarter Total
Pre-release
Planning 66 182 103 96 32 479 534
Sessions T Percentage
bjective 51% 140% 79% 73% 25% 368% 211%
Completed
(of 130)
6. *"Provide community referrals to the families of 50 inmates. " **"Provide community
referrals such as family counseling , child care, and employment assistance to the
families of 25 inmates. "
Referrals to families of inmates are made upon request and identification of the
need. Both the Security and the Programs staff are conscientious of and receptive
to the needs of the families. Referrals that are made include employment assist-
_ ance, social services , mental health, and WIRS (Weld Information and Referral
-10-
Service) . We have also, from time to time, conducted marriage and/or family
counseling sessions with inmates and their families. As shown in Chart VI this
objective was more easily met than anticipated.
CHART VI
First Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Total 1
Quarter Quarter Quarter _Quarter
Community
Referrals 8 15 11 8 42
of Families
Percentage
Objective 32% 60% 44% 32% 168%
Completed
(of 25)
Second Year Grant
First ' Second Third Fourth Extended-7 Total Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
Community
Referrals 20 16 8 5 4 53 95
of Families
Percentage J _
Objective 80% 64% 32% 20% 16% 212% 190%
Completed
(of 25)
7. *"Development of a comprehensive data base of all persons incarcerated. " **"To
maintain a comprehensive data base on all persons booked into and incarcerated
in the Weld County Jail . "
The Intake Data Sheet was designed during the first year of the grant in order
to obtain the demographic and psychological information on each arrestee. However,
the booking officers were not consistently completing them and gradually discon-
tinued their use. It was thought that the SPSS package would replace the IDS
and we are still hoping this will be true. The computer will store all necessary
information which will easily be "recalled" upon request. At present, however,
this objective is not being met and the problem is discussed in more detail in
the problem section.
8. **"To develop and implement a community volunteer program. "
-11-
The Programs Unit has excellent rapport with the Rehabilitation Department at
the University of Northern Colorado. Students who are seeking placements for
practicums or internships often request to work in the jail . This program
benefits both parties involved. Not only do the students gain valuable exper-
ience from the jail setting but their work eases the load of the counselors.
All interns and volunteers are screened by the In-House Counselor to assure the
maintenance of the high standards of the staff. A Volunteer Handbook has also
been developed to help train and orient the interns and volunteers coming into
the jail . Below is the number of hours the interns and volunteers have worked
in the jail during the second year.
CHART VII
Second Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Extended Cum.
quarter luarter luarter luarter - Total
Number of
ours Pro 666 485 1009 658 267 3085
ided by
Interns
umber of
ours Pro 192 237 34 29 24 516
vided by
olunteers
9. *"Provide counseling and preparation for 25 inmates who will be transferred to
a state correctional institution from the Weld County Jail (Objective Number Eight
in first year grant) . " **"Provide counseling and preparation to those inmates who
will be transferred to the Colorado Department of Corrections from the Weld County
Jail and who request such help. "
Being aware of when an individual is sentenced is relatively easy as long as the
"contact counselor" is maintaining communication with his/her case load. Coun-
seling, referrals , and immediate problem solving are offered to the inmate with
the opportunity for subsequent sessions as well . Not all inmates are interested
in this service, therefore the data is not necessarily consistent from quarter to
quarter. Also, there is often a very short amount of time between when an inmate
is sentenced and the time that he is taken to the State Penitentiary. Neverthe-
less , Chart VIII indicates the achievement of this objective.
-12-
CHART VIII
First Year Grant
First Second Third ' Fourth T Total ---
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter _
Number of
Inmates Re-
questing & 0 4 8 11 23
Receiving
Counseling
Second Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Extended Total Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
umber of
Inmates Re- Data
esting & not 23 9 8 7 47 70
Receiving Available
Counseling
�
ubsequent Datanot
- -
-- Sessions Available 14 37 5 6 62 62
10. ***"To establish and maintain contact and coordination with state and other County
correctional agencies having similar interest in the field of classification and/
or inmate services. "
This objective was a combination of Objectives Nine and Ten of the first year
grant. These objectives read as follows: 9) "Establish liaison with state
correctional agencies. " 10) "Improve coordination with local criminal justice
and public welfare agencies. "
The Programs Unit enjoys good rapport between many agencies concerned with cor-
rections. As more and more people become aware of the services we provide, our
contacts with them and coordination of services increase. The Larimer County
facilities are a major source of continuous contact. Referrals have been made
to their community corrections program, informational visits have been made to
the Larimer County Jail and workshops have been attended there. An informational
visit was made to the State Penitentiary in Canon City and other such trips to
correctional centers are now being planned by the Programs Director. Job Corps
and the Community Center Foundation are two other referral sources with which we
maintain contact. They provide alternative placements for eligible inmates. A
working relationship also exists between our staff and Human Resources and Social
Services. Weld Mental Health, on the other hand , is no longer operating under
contract with us. Although counselors from that agency do work with some inmates
-13-
on an individual basis as well as providing the New Horizons drug treatment
group, they are no longer called upon to perform psychological evaluations. If
that need is evident, the inmate is transported to the psychiatric wing of the
local hospital or to Puebelo State Hospital . Chart IX indicates the number of
contacts made per quarter.
CHART IX
First Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Total
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
Number of Data Data
Contacts Not Not 43 55 98
w/other Available Available
Agencies
Second Year Grant
First Second Third Fourth Extended Total Cum.
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
Number of
ontacts 127 126 136 89 98 576 674
/other
gencies
11. ***"To develop inmate involvement in the design and delivery of the services
offered or coordinated by the Programs Unit. " Objective Number Fourteen of the
first year grant stated "Develop inmate involvement in the classification referral
project. "
This objective has been met in several ways. During the first year the Inmate
Request/Complaint Form was established (see Appendix V) . This form is extremely
useful and easily accessible to the inmates. Inmates are encouraged to use these
forms not only for classification request or complaints , but for other needs and
concerns as well . The second interview is also an opportunity for the inmate
to express his desires. One of the questions asked is if the individual knows
anyone else in the jail . Precautions thus are taken to prevent "enemies" from
being placed together. The Inmate Countil is another avenue for expression and
involvement. Each pod chooses a representative from that pod to attend the meet-
ings which are held twice a month. The following staff members from the jail
also attend in order to answer the pods problems and concerns: A representative
from Security, the Support Services Lieutenant , a representative from the kitchen
and the commissary. The Programs Unit secretary also attends in order to take
minutes of the meeting. As of yet no formal questionnaire for an evaluative
-14-
measure of the programs offered in the jail has been developed to be used on a
regular basis. A survey was given to inmates during the first year of the grant,
however, and the results were used for consideration for changes.
12. ***"To develop security line staff involvement in the evaluation of the services
offered or coordinated by the Programs Unit. " This was Objective Number Fifteen
of the first year grant which stated "Develop security staff involvement in the
Classification/Referral Project. "
Security involvement is essential to the classification process. Although recom-
mendations are made by the classification counselor, it is a lieutenant or watch
commander who must approve the moves. The Security staff is also encouraged to
utilize the Security Behavior Logs. These are forms which allow for brief re-
counts of incidences with inmates which the counselors would not necessarily be
aware of. In addition, input and approval from a whole shift of Security is
always solicited when selecting individuals to be trustees. With regard to
evaluation of services offered by Programs there has been no questionnaire dis-
tributed as of yet. It is hoped that this will be forthcoming. We in the Pro-
grams Unit are interested in learning the level of familiarity the individuals
in Security have with our programs as well as suggestions for improvement and
refinement. A questionnaire that was given dealt with the officers ' attitudes
towards the administration in relation to their jobs and their needs. One of
the immediate actions taken in response to the survey results was the develop-
ment of an approved Colorado Law Enforcement Training Association Stress Man-
agement class which was conducted by our In-House Counselor. This class was
highly successful .
The following objectives are those written in the first year grant but which were
met and thus eliminated from the second year grant.
11. *"Develop material both qualitative and quantitative of the effect of other
agencies of the referral process of the Weld County Jail . "
As stated previously, many agencies are receptive to and supportive of the
services offered by the jail . They too see the improtance of providing inmates
with opportunities to help themselves. Proof of this fact is demonstrated by
the willingness of these agencies to conduct groups in the jail . Weld Mental
Health , Alcoholics Anonymous , Alcoholic Rehabilitation and Recovery Center,
the Greeley Christian Church, the County Health Department, Aims Community
College, and the University of Northern Colorado provide a number of services
already mentioned in this report, and we expect continued support. Qualitatively
there are other factors to be considered. The Project Directors have all been
a member of the Advisory Board for the Alcoholic Rehabilitation and Recovery
Center. In addition to this, the present Director is a board member of the
Volunteer Resources Bureau. The In-House Counselor is presently in the process
of organizing an impact group for juveniles. His idea is to provide counseling
for juveniles by adult inmates in the jail as an alternative to detention. This
would necessitate coordination and cooperation with the courts and Probation.
12. *"Develop a data base to substantiate the use of referrals by a community pro-
gram. "
This objective was eliminated from the second year grant due to repetition,
specifically from Ojbectives Number Three and Six.
-15-
13. *"Isolate behavior problems within certain pods of the Weld County Jail . "
This too is similar to Objective Number One in that a classification system has
been established which necessarily identifies behavioral problems within the
jail . The inmates who exhibit such problems are "isolated" from the general
population to insure the safety and security of the building. G-Max is utilized
for such individuals and a level system has been established (see Appendix VI ) .
The level system is part of the disciplinary procedure for inmates requiring such.
Level One allows virtually no extra privileges beyond legal rights and Level
Four has the same privileges as anyone in the general population. Levels Two
and Three allow varying degrees of privileges , thus , incentive is given to the
inmate to obtain Level Four. However, certain behaviors and accomplishments
are required in order to advance levels. A review board is held weekly, attend-
ed by the Lieutenant of Security, the inmate' s counselor and the inmate. To-
gether a determination is made as to whether or not the inmate is eligible for
advancement.
-16-
PROBLEMS
The following section is divided into three parts in order to more completely out-
line the problems faced during the entire grant period. These divisions are:
Problems Encountered and Resolved, Ongoing and Unresolved Problems, and Problems
that are Questionable.
Problems Encountered and Resolved
1. Lack of office space, equipment and phones.
There is now an office for each counselor as well as the secretary. Interns
are also provided an office of their own. Each office, except for the interns' ,
has a phone with its own extension and all the necessary equipment and supplies
ordered are available.
2. No intake pod.
A wall was constructed in G pod in order to "create" a pod for intake. G pod
originally housed nineteen inmates. The dividing wall made it possible to house
eleven inmates for the purpose of intake, separating them from G-Max, which is
used for problem behaviors or protective custody. G-Max thus holds a total of
eight individuals.
3. The development and understanding of the classification system.
Many approaches to classification have been experimented with during the two
years. The problems centered' around coming up with a system which met the
standards of the federal guidelines , the grant, and the Weld County Sheriff' s
Department. We believe the system we are now employing and which has been in
effect with no changes for nearly a year, is meeting the requirements and ex-
pectations of all concerned. In addition to its effectiveness in this jail ,
we believe it can be used as a model for other correctional institutions. It
is organized yet simple in its administration and provides a systematic method
of classification.
4. Communication within the Programs Staff.
The Staff had difficulties at times in dealing with the different approaches
used toward problem solving. These differences thwarted efforts made in
achieving our goals and objectives. This problem was faced and dealt with,
yet only two members of the original staff have remained with the Unit from
its conception. Many people have come and gone , which is addressed in the next
section of problems. However, the present staff is unified and supportive of
one another. Communication is kept open through weekly staff meetings and
staffings. In addition, a cross training program was initiated. This afforded
each counselor the opportunity to learn the job responsibilities of the others
in the unit. As a result, we will be able to fill in for and help one another
when the need arises.
-17-
Ongoing and Unresolved Problems
1. Turn over of personnel , under staffing.
The major problem during the first year of the grant was the difficulty of find-
ing qualified personnel for the Programs positions. Once a good solid staff
was found, the problem turned to retaining them. The present Project Director
is the fifth in the two and a half year existence of the grant. Although the
Chief of Intake/Classification was present for one and a half years, he was not
replaced after he left in October of 1980. The two classification counselors
positions also changed hands many times during the two and a half years. One
of these positions has been eliminated, leaving the remaining Classification
Counselor to do the work originally designed for three. We have also gone
without a secretary for extended periods of time, thus the high turnover of
personnel , resulting in understaffing, has been difficult to deal with. We are
presently operating with a Director of Correctional Programs , a Work Release
Supervisor (Counselor III) , an In-House Counselor (Counselor III) , a Programs
Counselor (formerly Work Release Counselor II) , an In-Take/Classification Coun-
selor (Counselor II) and a Secretary IV. This reduction in staff, down from
eight, together with the increase of the inmate population causes overloads of
responsibility for all of us. As a result, our contact with inmates decreases.
The cross training mentioned previously was necessary so that we can help one
another "get the job done" in the overcrowded situations. I personally see no
immediate solutions to this problem. We are bound by the administration who
will not hire replacements for the counselors we lost. It will also be in-
creasingly difficult to retain those who do stay on , due to the inequitable
salaries. This will be discussed in the next section of problems.
2. Fulfillment of Objective Number Seven.
During the first year of the grant an Intake Data Sheet was developed which
was used to gather demographic data on each person booked into the jail . The
booking officers were to fill out this sheet along with the other paperwork
involved in the booking procedure. This practice gradually declined , both
qualitatively and quantitatively. Only portions of the sheets were being com-
pleted if they were filled out at all . It was about this time that the SPSS
package (Standard Package for Social Services) was purchased and it was thought
that the data would be collected and stored in the computer. As is the case
with many new implementations , the process was slow moving. The computers
finally got on line in October, 1980. They are now being used for the booking
process , thus recording some of the data previously collected. The problem
facing us now is that there is no one to bring our unit' s computer programs on
line. Both individuals concerned with this area have left the Department, so
we are put on hold once again.
3. Lack of a follow-up program on referrals (Objective Number Three) .
Although not specifically stated in Objective Number Three, it was expected
that a questionnaire would be distributed to all agencies to whom we make
referrals. This questionnaire would assess the quality of the referral pro-
cess and the level of inmate follow-up on referrals. This would help determine
whether the agency or organization could add to services which would be valuable
to our clientele and provide a means of suggesting improvements for our program.
To my knowledge no such questionnaire was ever developed. Some counselors were
-18-
not aware of this "requirement" although it certainly would be helpful infor-
mation regardless of the grant' s objectives. Problems lie in the identifica-
tion of the Program Units' priorities as expected by both the administration
and the counselors. Our role is seen by the administration as more of trouble
shooters , go-fers and occasionally, resolvers of crises. Programs and referrals
are basically secondary in importance. The Programs Staff on the other hand,
prefer to work for the good of the inmates , offering them the services and coun-
seling needed in order to prevent them from returning to jail . This conflict in
objectives reduces the amount of follow-up contact that we are able to explore.
However, this may be a project that interns could undertake.
4. Community Corrections in Weld County.
The idea of a community corrections program is not new. This suggestion has
been considered since 1977 , but until recently no action had been taken. The
Director of Correctional Programs is currently developing a proposal for such
a program in Weld County. The need is evident, given the rapidly increasing
daily population of the jail . A Community Corrections facility would provide
for work release , half way house, inmates returning from state correctional
institutions and the like, thereby relieving the overcrowded conditions in the
jail . It is hoped that such a facility will be built soon.
Problems that are Questionable
1. Philosophical foundation of jail staff.
Although communication between Security and Programs has improved tremendously,
there still seems to be somewhat of an "us against them" attitude from time
to time. We are more respected and appreciated now than before. We are not
totally accepted, however, for who we are or what we are trying to do. As
mentioned in previous reports , one major step forward was made when the Programs
Unit began meeting with the Sheriff and the Undersheriff on a monthly basis.
These meetings were for the purpose of sharing information about the activities
of the Programs Unit in hopes of gaining support from the administration. We
no longer have these meetings , and it is not always clear where we stand with
Security and the administration.
2. Salaries/job descriptions.
There has been much dissatisfaction on the part of the counselors regarding
inequities in salaries. Comparisons are being made with salaries and job de-
scriptions for other community service counselors in the county as well as in
the state (Appendix VII contains the job descriptions for counselors in the
Weld County Sheriff's Office) . Again we feel an attitude of unacceptance due
to the lower pay, lower "standard of living increases" and the unwillingness
to replace counselorswho leave. Thus , we are looking into the possibilities
of upgrading our jobs as one solution. What can or will be done to remedy this
problem remains to be seen.
3. Lack of training for Security on classification procedures.
This problem, too, is questionable because improvements have been made in this
area. However, the Programs Staff has attempted to provide a formal training
-19-
session on the activities of the Unit and Classification in particular, but
to no avail . A memo was written recently (see Appendix IX) as a brief reminder
of the classification criteria , but more specific and detailed training is
necessary in order to provide full understanding. It is suspected that resist-
ance to this training is a result of the differences in philosophy and attitude
as discussed in problem number one.
4. Inconsistent or nonexistent data collection.
Many of the counselors have, from time to time, been remiss in the recording
of data. Perhaps the procedures for this documentation were unclear or unwork-
able. Perhaps the counselors were forgetful or just plain lazy, not realizing
the importance of data collection. I tend to believe all these factors played
a part in the inconsistent documentation of data. However, this problem can
be worked on and solved. For example , our case notes are now taped and the
secretary transcribes them in the appropriate file. This saves time for the
counselors and reduces the amount of paperwork with which we must contend. Other
record keeping can be done by the secretary and/or interns.
-20-
PROJECT CHANGES
1. Project Directors/Programs Staff.
There have been many personnel changes during the grant period. the following
is a summary of the changeovers. The first Project Director and co-author of
the grant was Capt. Steven J. Thomas. At that time, October of 1978, Linda
Plasters was the only Classification Counselor. Cody Wathen was hired in
February of 1979 as the other Classification Counselor. By then the Project
Director had gone from Capt. Thomas to Capt. Lewis Tydings and finally to Tom
Mannweiler, who was Director through September of 1979. Richard Wing , the
Intake/Classification Supervisor (whose title was later changed to Chief of
Intake/Classification) , was hired in March of 1979 and stayed on board until
October of 1980. While Linda Plasters was on maternity leave, (July through
October, 1979) the Classification position was temporarily filled by Barry
Erdman. Following Mr. Mannweiler' s resignation , Cody Wathen was promoted to
Director of Correctional Programs and, thus , the new Project Director. Upon
Mrs. Plasters ' return in November of 1979, she filled the In-House Counselor
position. Mr. Erdman left and the two Classification positions were filled
by Margie Meck and Doug Maurer in November, 1979. Mr. Maurer resigned in April
1980, but his position was not filled until September. During that time, in
October of 1980, rr. Wing also resigned. Mr. Wathen then resigned in September,
leaving Bill Hardgrave (who had been the In-House Counselor) as the Director of
Correctional Programs. Mr. Hardgrave is also the present Project Director.
Dave 7obeck filled the Classification position for two and a half months before
moving into the vacant In-House Counselor' s job. The classification section
was not the only group with personnel turnover. The two Work Release positions
have also changed hands many times , as well as the secretary. Despite all of
these changes , the Programs Unit, as it exists now, is enthusiastic and opti-
mistic for the future work to be done here in the Weld County Jail . (see
Chart X)
2. The Classification System.
There have been numerous classification systems experimented with over the
grant period in an attempt to determine which method seemed to be most effect-
ive for the jail , while still meeting Federal and grant requirements. The
initial system developed was one which used demographic data in a progressive/
regressive arrangement. The problem with this method was that moves were
made on "gut feelings", thus personal prejudices could be influential . Also,
once an inmate was placed in a pod , he often resisted moving again even if it
was meant to be a "progression". The next system suggested was through the use
of an extensive interview form. This form gathered a wealth of information
about each individual , but had no criteria for pod placement. It required two
hours to complete and , thus, was too time consuming. Another classification
system tried was one which separated people according to their participation
in groups and programs. Those who wanted to participate in groups and programs
were housed together, and those who did not were placed elsewhere. This failed
to meet the Federal guidelines and also did not make an allowance for behavioral
problems. Finally, a system which meets the needs of all concerned was develop-
ed. The system utilizes an intake pod for temporary placement, followed by a
move to a pod based on rather objective evaluations and other criteria. The
system we are presently operating under is described in detail under Objective
-21-
Number One and in Appendix I . As a result of the changes in classification
systems, many interview forms have also been employed. Again , we believe the
ones presently in use best obtain the information needed for classification
purposes (Appendix III and IV) . Likewise, a different Security Observation
Form is being used. Due to the impossibility of getting the Likert scale
forms filled out by officers on a regular basis , we now rely on Inmate Be-
havioral Forms. These are logs of noteworthy inmate behavior which the offi-
cers record.
3. G-Pod Division.
Due to the lack of an intake pod, it was decided that G Pod could be divided
by a cinder block wall , one side being used for intake and the other for maxi-
mum security. This addition was completed in September of 1979. G-Intake
houses eleven people and G-Max can accommodate eight.
4. G-Max Level System.
The level system for G-Max pod was implemented in June of 1980. It is a dis-
ciplinary system which requires certain behaviors and accomplishments from the
inmate before progression is allowed (see Appendix VI) . The system is explained
in detail under Objective Number Thirteen and has worked very well in providing
incentive to inmates with behavioral problems to follow jail rules and regula-
tions.
5. G-Max Dayroom.
A change in the structuring of the dayroom in Max will result in an additional
300 square feet of usable space (see Appendix VIII) . The room is presently
useless , but after this reconstruction we expect to house the library there,
hold group meetings there, use it as an arts and crafts room or for contact
visits and counseling sessions. This restructuring is being accomplished at
this time and is scheduled to be completed by the first week of February.
-22-
• - .1 ,1
• I I I G
.. 1 I c,
I 0 a ..:
u > 1 > p I 1 Y_
I;
C .• tt I I
eel I I
O .•.1 co I ! I
! x • m I 1
L ._ ' I ' I
u I A 1 I
O ' I U I >
-a�- r.,_•____ _
C A I ( co I I 4. __�_�___.r-
fn I I 1 A N '1 I 1 L. I I
---DD---t - - t -- ___.L.�-z . -_—_-_ 1
O { I I I 1 IPI i 1
Q 1 j I k • I
1 I 1
-+ 1 I I 1 A -4_--
I-4 1 ^
1 in I I ( i I
, 1_ I ; I I
t t
7 i I 1 . 1 j t 1 I I
I
" �! 1 - ( I I t 1
i
>+ I I •
I I L _ I
xetl 1 I
I I II
I I _ , 1 1
C. I I I { 1 iii ( ( 1
Li
1 1 I I I I I I I I
L4 1 1 I { 1 ' —�! T
' -
_: — �{ 1 1 ( 1 �I I 1 1
- - 1 - --L_ t L_S 1 1 I
A
d I I 1 I I pr__ t 1
,s.
I I 1 I I I I I a; C
or) G I I I l 1 1 s. 7
Q` rJ 1 m O
--+ '--) I 1 I l I I n co
--.. - L_ -�1_ -�- I I • I I 1
u ,____T_-
)▪ 1 1 1 1 U+ 1
v 1 N •.-I 1 c0 ♦-1 G
df 1•+ tom '0 fn I •.-1
O• O CI O N N W -,-1 .-•c 1. k
Z U I a .1---. �- 7: r•] ta•, cd 0
I •,-. u
--. _I_ L+ 1J
—7� I c„
u I
O I
r. _
_ I A\ 1
I
G. I I I _"____L_` _ fi'cu cn I I I I 1 cu 1
--- I I I 1 -4 1
Ro I e c,;
O I I I � I al u � --- I
Q I 0 p, Cr)
I I I >, co I I
I L G
X - I I ►+ O I A --f-----
'-) ` i.I I = ti [ --I 1 I
— i _ 1 I I
E.3 O I 1 I I 1 1 I
'7 1
I I I 1 I I •1 I
t
T. I I I 1 _r— r c
co E
z I I l 1 1 1 I 1
1
I 1 ! I 1 1 1 1 I
Ca, F4 1 I 1 1 1 1
E I
be 1 I 1 1 I t I
3 I E 1 - 6- ---1-—CO I X01 1 1 1 1 1
I t
— t l 1 —^ 1— — I___ t_ I
es
✓ 1 , 1 I [ I I
1 1 I I I i I
r- G 1 1 1 1 t
CT '-, E 1 1 1 I I
t
Lt I
41 i I 1 1 I I
i
Gl I `
1 I I 1 1__
O I 1 I 1 t
t !
Z S� 1 1 t I CIO
CO r-' L. I I I { ,--4
rn y a NA A u
- 1. '0 3 m ,
( I 1 � u
.
C Ix) E G G co I I I L. +-I
u N H % I .] a 1 I 1
O u X !I -
I I 1 44 G W ?, , ,---' GOO •
f•-• L+ la ! L+ QJ E C7 E -a
e-' •w �� •
P. <`'J
v ro U fn
a .. A A . O ] y r >
L. In u T ;n y II
3O a+ 4 . L. L L. r. L. r, L
. O C U — a V O :. r >.
O a. w v v z1 L 1! '5
�+ L J 6
4+ '••+ v 'n 4l 7 'n E" > x •n u •
r, . w 0 -x x
V L •^J VI m n j Q j L C . G h; 1.•
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
FLOWCHART OF INMATE MOVEMENT
Arrestee
1 .
Booked (placed in Holding)
Intake Interview (the first working day after being booked) —+ released
1
Court appearance (advisement, bond setting) —+ released
1
Moved to G-Intake Pod (day after court appearance) —► released
1
Second Interview/explanation of available groups and programs/
counselor assigned (4-5 days after being booked)
•
Moved to permanant housing —a released
B Pod C od D Pod G-Max
Young Somewhat jail ex- Older in age/ Protective Custody
New to Jail perienced maturity Escape risk
Victims Cooperative Sentenced Dangerous
Somewhat unstable Non-victims Stable Punitive
Serving short Victimizers
mittimus
May be moved to another pod (including Holding) because of: 1) Security problems
2) Disciplinary action
3) Specific request
4) Medical problems
APPENDIX II
CLASSIFICATION/INTAKE SCREEN
CASE NUMBER AGENCY SUBJECT NUMBER
NAME SEX DOB
TRACK NUMBER SPEAKS ENGLISH
EMPLOYMENT STATUS VOCATIONAL TRAINING STATUS
ACADEMIC TRAINING STATUS_ GENERAL PHYSICAL CONDITION
PHYSICAL CONDITION AT INTAKE MENTAL HEALTH HISTORY
MENTAL STATUS ON INTAKE LEGAL HISTORY
HOUSING _ ALCOHOL ABUSE
DRUG ABUSE .
CHARGES SEXUALITY LONGEST PERIOD INCARCERATED
NUMBER TIMES INCARCERATED TOTAL TIME INCARCERATED
OBSERVATION RATING:
Initial 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
EMOT. INSTABILITY
VICTIM _
MANIPULATIVE _
SUICIDAL
DEPRESSIVE
PARANOID
SCHIZOID
DISRUPTER
DATE
COUNSELOR
COMMENTS:
ASSIGNED STAFF MEMBER: POD/RM ASSIGNMENT
NOTES:
1 . These notes are to be added to as we perfect this program.
2. AGE = Date - DOB
3. G-MAX is FULL if Total beds available - 2 beds = ZERO.
4. COUNSELOR OVERRIDE = the interviewing counselor can override the
programs decision before it is finally entered .
5. COUNSELOR DISCREPANCY flag: On 2nd and subsequent interviews, if the POD
ASSIGNMENT is different than previous assignment, the screen will flash
with COUNSELOR DISCREPANCY. The counselor will then make the decision before
entering the change.
6. If the individual being processed has friends or enemies in the jail , the
counselor will have to override the programs POD/RM assignment.
CLASSIFICATION/INTAKE
• A POD E FOG C POD D POD G-INTAKE G-MAX •
1 J
APO
SEX
YES
INTERVIEW F? •
. • i NO •
G-MA
First (Initial )
Interview? YES HOMOSEXUAL? YES
(5)
1,NO G-MAX NO
HOMOSEXUAL? EXTREMELY
{5} /ES SUICIDAL? YES
(8-9)
'NO
\SELL1vIATE? V
ES yk,G INTAKE
K.___../(9) j
, •
NO
\ cHARES ®
iB
NO
LONGEST FEF_0D ': ''3ER TIMES `,
TOTAL TIME?
INCARCERATIJ7 'ES çCARCERATED? YES (1 ) /Es
. {l 4- 5)
(i )
f'r I N0 t N0
Y
LONGEST ='C=;D/1/ NUMBER TIMES - TOTAL TIME?
. -- _: _ ` . _: ); . CARCERAT ED? vrc (5) ES
1 _ : ; \ 1 + 5)
[r7D
B POD
A--
E'S;"I v'i=.L AGE? /5
I;STABILITY
YES
E 9? G-MAX
NO +25
VICTIM
YES
8-9?
G-MAX
I NO -71
SUICIDAL
YES
8-9?
I NO B POD
n
SUICIDAL AGE? /5
YES
6-7?
1+25 G-MMAX
A ROOM IN G-MAX? /YES
n
PARNOID YES
8-5?
I NO
NO B POD
1
PARANOID AGE? -25
ES
6-7?
NO _ +25 C POD
1:
i\
ci
__..
: .
. _ .
G-MAX •
v
DISRUPTER
YES
8-9?
1NO •
BPD
DISRUPTER AGE? -25
YFS
6-7?
G-MAX
NO +25 T
c
G-MAX
SCHIZOID
YES
8-9?
NO
-
(j)
l
LONGEST PERIOD NUMBER TIMES TOTAL TIME? POC
INCARCERATION? YES INCARCERATED? YES (1 ) /YES
11) (1 + 5)
I NO 'NO
NO
LONGEST PERIOD NUMBER TIMES TOTAL TIME? �-
INCARCERATION? YES INCARCERATED? YES
/ES
(1 + 5) (1 + 5) (5) C PO
NO 1 NO NO
v
G- M:Y.
•
in
.. 1 \: z
ETD YES •
8-9? .
two AGE? 25
G-MAX
— G MAX
+25 —7s—
SUICIDAL
ES
8-9?
NO
`✓ G—M{
\ --is
SUICIDAL ROOM IN
6-7? YES G-MAX? /YES
NO
y < NO
PARANOID
YES
8-9?
INO G-MAX
SCHIZOID
YES
8-9?
INO
• 6-MAX
v
DISRUPTER
YES
8-9?
ND -
I
v
B PJD
•
G-MAX
7 . . .
\ :EE
/ES
TY
I?i0 T
VICTIM
/ES
8-9?
‘t0
SUICIDAL
/S
8-9?
1N0 G MAX
SUICIDAL ROOM IN
` ES
6-7? YE
) G-MAX?
it@ NO
C •
1 G-"---
-MAX
PARANOID
/YES
8-9?
:MAX\ • SCHIZOID,
''ES
8-9?
t'0 • G-MAX
i
NDISRUPTER
'ES
8-9?
G-MAX
EMOTIONAL •
INSTABILITY /YES
Cli) •
8-9?• \I/NO
G-MAX
A
• VICTIM -
• -YES • -
8-9?
�NO G-MAX
SUICIDAL
YES
8-9?
TO G-MAX
- 7C
ROOM IN
SUICIDAL
/ YES G-MAX? • ES
6-7?
1NO NO
G-MAX
- PARANOID
YES
8-9?
INO
`IY G-MAX
SCHIZOID YES
8-9? •
,
NO G-MAX
NJ8_9?
YES
NO
v
D POD
POD .
Nit
FLAG COUNSELOR (Assigned POD FULL)
FULL? YES T
NO . •
- -
V .
\ -
Do all rooms ASSIGN TO NEXT
have at least YES
one occupant? AVAILABLE ROOM IN
OUEUE.
NU
ASSIGN TO EMPTY ROOM
AND PUT IN QUEUE FOR
FOR NEXT ROOM
ASSIGNMENT.
N,
Contact =1
SPEAKS ASSIGN TO NEXT •
YES Indiv. Coun =2
ENGLISH? ) AVAILABLE
COUNSELOR. Family/Conj =3
NO + - Staff Coun = 2
v
ASSIGN TO DAVE. .
I
AFPL4D;X III ID if
DATE (interview) DATE (arrest)
NAME: i DOB AGE HT WT
ADDRESS: •
ASPEAK ENGLISH YES NO
MEDICAL ISSUES:
SPECIFIC CHARGES:
•
OBSERVATION SCALE PREVIOUS CHARGES
(C) 1 . Emot. Unstable 1 3 5 7 9 Calm, stable
(E) 2. Conforming 1 3 5 7 9 Rebellious
(H) 3. Timid/restrained 1 3 5 7 9 Assaultive
(I) 4. Self-reliant 1 3 5 7 9 Victim
(N) 5. Sincere - 1 3 5 _.7 9 Manipulative
(D2)6. No death wish 1 3 5 7 9 Suicidal •
(D5)7. Positive 1 3 5 7 9 Depressive
(pa)8. Confident 1 3 5- 7 9 Paranoid
9.• Substance free 1 ' 3 5 7 9 Sub. abuser
(Sc)10.Clear thoughts 1 3 5 7 9 Schizoid
11 .Stabilizer 1 3 5 7 9 Disrupter •
12. Con wise 1 3 5 7 9 Naive
Homosexual? Yes Na Sex deviate? Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
•
- POD PLACEMENT: B C D MAX INTERVIEWER'S NAME:
•
APPENDIX IV
DATE
INMATE'S NAME IDA DOB
Sentenced? `1 N Pending charges? Y N Judge Attorney
t ..JGRAMS: GED _ LIFE SKILLS TRUSTY COUNSELING _
ARRC _ BIBLE STUDY _ TESTING _ MARRIAGE COUNSELING _
AA __ SUPPORT GROUP CHAPLAIN HANDBOOK
HORIZONS SPANISH SPEAKING _ CHURCH _ MEDICAL
LIBRARY
Do you know any inmates already here in jail? Y N Who?
Relationship? _
Who were you living with before you were brought to jail?
Is your family okay? Y N Problems
How far did you go in school?
What work do you do?
Do you drink? Y N What? How much?
How long? Would you like to change your drinking habits? Y N
P--you use drugs? Y N What? How much? •
How long? Would you like to change your drug habits? Y N
Have you ever been to a psychologist or counselor? Y N When?
Where? Who? How long?
Why? - Was it helpful? Y N Why/Why not?
Have you ever attempted suicide? Y N Number of times? When?
How? Why? .
.
What do you do when you are angry or frustrated?
What kinds of changes would you like to make in your life, character, personality?
What activities do you enjoy?
•
OBSERVATION SCALE
(C) Emotionally unstable 1 3 5 7 9 Calm, stable
(E) Conforming 1 3 5 7 9 Rebellious
(H) Timid/restrained 1 3 5 7 9 Assaultive
(I) Self-reliant 1 3 5 7 9 Victim
(N) Sincere 1 3 5 7 9 Manipulative
(02) No death wish 1 3 5 7 9 Suicidal
(05) Positive 1 3 5 7 9 Depressive
(Pa) Confident 1 3 5 7 9 Paranoid
(Sc) Clear thoughts 1 3 5 7 9 Schizoid
Substance free 1 3 5 7 9 Substance abuser
Stabilizer 1 3 5 7 9 Disrupter
Con wise 1 3 5 7 9 Naive
Homosexual? Y N Sex deviate? Y N
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
POD RECOMMENDATION: B C D MAX INTERVIEWER'S NAME
'r r,. i:c :‘,nt 6
APPENDIX V
JAIL DIVISION
INMATE RI nuLST/COAPLA)NT I ORM
TO: FROM: POD: DATE:
J W TS 1 ORM) ' -MUTE'S NAML)
PART A -- INMATE REQUEST/COMPLAINT
SIGNATURE OF INMATE:
PART E - ACTION TAKEN EY STAFF
(FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
•
SIGNATURE OF STAFF MEMBER TAKING ACTION
(DETACH ALONG THIS LINE)
PART C - WRITTEN RESPONSE TO INMATE
RETURN THIS FORM TO: POP: DATE:
STAFF'S SIGNATURE _
(DETACH ALONG THIS LINE)
PART D - RECEIPT FROM STAFF RECEIVING THIS FORM
INMATE: POD: DATE:
I ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT THIS DATE OF A REQUEST OR COMPLAINT FROM THE ABOVE NAMED INMATE,
--- STATIMAITUCITTs CTh7r'FTl!Pi
'J- .^-- APN.
APPENDIX •VI - .
LEVEL SYSTEM FOR MAX
I. a. Lockdown for all but one hour per day for showers
and/or exercise 0800 (8 a.m. )- to 0900 (9 a.m. )
b. No cigarettes or matches.
c. Legal phone calls daily during time out. 0800
(8 a.m. ) to 0900 (9 a.m. ) .
d. No visits. (Except for attorney or other court
ordered types of visits)
e. No commissary.
f. One religious book or tract if requested.
g. At least hourly security check.
h. No gym privileges.
TO ADVANCE:
a. Minimum of five days without infraction of any
kind. (including swearing at or bad mouthing
officers, etc. )
II. a. Lockdown 1900 (7 p.m. )to 0700 (7 a.m. ). 0900
( 9 a.m. )to 1100 (11 a.m. ), 1300 (1 p.m.)to1600
(4 p.m. ).
b. One cigarette after each meal .
c. Two personal phone calls per week in addition to
regular legal calls.
d. Two visits per week permitted.
e. Regular commissary up to $5.00 per week.
f. Regular limitations on literature. (4 paperbacks
and 4 magazines)
g. Regular face count security checks.
h. In room or out only according to specifics of
schedule. Room to be locked except when officer
accesses for entrance or exit.
TO ADVANCE:
a. Minimum one week (7 days) without infraction of any
kind. (CF jail rules)
b. Regular visits with assigned counselor (as sched-
uled) and completion of therapeutic assignments.
(Therapeutic assignments will be reviewed by
LEVEL SYSTEM FOR MAX
Programs Director and Security Lt. to assure
appropriateness. Careful record maintained of
corrective actions for reviews by attorney or
courts, if necessary.
III . a. Lockdown 2100 (9 p.m. ) to 0700 (7 a.m. ) .
b. Maximum of one full pack of cigarettes per day if
requested and purchased through commissary.
c. Regular phone call privileges for max (1 personal
daily if time permits).
d. Regular visitor (1 daily).
e. Regular commissary.
f. Regular literature (4 paperbacks and 4 magazines) .
g. Permission to attend classes , if desired.
h. No gym privileges.
i . Allowed to go in room on request from 0700 (7 a.m. )
to 2100(9 p.m. ), for private time.
TO ADVANCE:
a. Minimum one week (7 days) without infraction.
b. Same as level II.
IV. a. Same as level III except full cigarette privileges.
b. Lockdown 0030 (1230 a.m. ) to 0700 (7 a.m. ) every
night including weekends regardless of T.V. pro-
gramming.
c. Gym privileges with 2nd floor pods at least once
a week for familiarization and reintregration to
second floor.
d. Allowed to go in room at any time during day and
spend private time there.
e. P.C. will be allowed gym time separately.
TO ADVANCE: (return to general population)
a. Minimum of one week (7 days) without infraction.
b. Same as level II .
NOTE: PASSING OF CIGARETTES TO INMATES ON LOWER LEVEL WILL
BE CONSIDERED THE SAME AS "INTRODUCTION OF CONTRA-
BAND."
LEVEL SYSTEM FOR MAX
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
Reviews will be conducted on Tuesdays at 0900 (9 a.m. ).
Personnel to be present at review meetings include the
following:
1 . Security Lt. or other jail officer of
equal or higher rank.
2. Counselor for the inmate.
3. Medical representative.
4. Secretary.
5. Inmate in question.
At that time, it will be determined whether the inmate
should be advanced a level , remain the same, or be re-
gressed to a lower level .
The attached form should be completed at this meeting
and made available so that the 3rd floor officer will
know the level and dispensation/treatment to be accorded
each inmate in max.
P.C. 'S in Maximum
People in protective custody will come into Max at
level four. If there is any acting out on their part,
they can decline along the level system as seems appropri-
ate rather than necessarily being moved into the Intake
Pod. Disciplinary procedure takes over at this point.
(ie offense report or incident report) . The intake pod
will be used only for Intake personnel and those unusual
characters who have to be kept completely separate and
yet ought not be locked down.
Housing:
P.C. 's will be housed separately from those who are as-
signed to max by disciplinary procedure. Consideration
should be given to types and numbers of inmates being
housed by level or purpose (e.g. do not put one level I
max inmate in a 3 man room. ) Consolidate if appropriate.
MAX LEVEL SYSTEM
For Disciplinary Boards
Disciplinary review board have the perogative to place
individuals in G Max, should they deem the incident serious
enough. Placement will automatically be at level II
thereby, allowing for further regression if the individual
continues to act out,or for progress as desired.
At time of movement, level system should be explained
fully. Person doing move should explain. Level system
shall be posted in G Max window. Officer on duty at
time of move is responsible for verbal explanation of
system and explaining the possibility of regression.
MAX LEVEL AND REVIEW SHEET
..Name
Date Entered Max Level Projected Review Date
REVIEWER COMMENTS:
MAX LEVEL AND REVIEW SHEET
Name
Date Entered Max Level Projected Review Date
REVIEWER COMMENTS:
MAX LEVEL AND REVIEW SHEET
Name
Date Entered Max Level Projected Review Date
REVIEWER COMMENTS:
'1
APPENDIX VII
DIRECTOR, CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS
Description of Work:
I. General statement of duties:
Establish, manage and administer correctional counseling programs.
II . Supervision received:
Works under broad policy guidance and supervision of the Jail Administrator.
III . Supervision exercised:
Supervises correctional counseling personnel , interns/volunteers and
administrative assistant assigned to the programs section, including
scheduling, assigning duties , and employee evaluations.
IV. Consultation exercised:
Works as therapeutic counseling consultant to jail security personnel ,
the courts and administration concerning inmate related problems.
Consults with Directors of other counseling agencies to ensure a
coordination of effort and cooperation when programs overlap (i .e. ARRC,
A Woman's Place, Weld Mental Health, Neighboring Correctional Facilities,
Department of Human Resources, Volunteer Bureau) . Consultant to
judicial system concerning psychological health of inmates.
V. Example of duties :
A. Plan, establish and maintain correctional programs for the jail
with the assistance of the correctional counseling staff.
B. Supervise and provide professional growth opportunities for the
correctional counseling staff.
C. Plan , establish and assist in maintenance of counseling files for
inmate population with emphasis on maintaining confidentiality. Coordinate
the maintenance of files with other counseling staff and the programs
secretary.
D. Serve as therapeutic counselor to staff members of the Sheriff' s
Department and their families.
E. Serve as on-call counselor with other counseling staff during off-duty
hours, and as crisis call counselor at anytime these services are required.
F. Establish and maintain working relationships with Directors of community
agencies and heads of other sections within the Sheriff' s Department in
order to fully coordinate services.
G. Coordinates in-service training for counseling staff both in the Sheriff's
Department and in other counseling agencies to ensure professional growth of
counseling staff.
H. Performs in-house group and individual counseling as requested or required.
I . Prepares budgetary requests and administers allowed budget.
J. Processes furlough requests, provides psychological testing and
test interpretation for those clients requesting these services .
K. Formulates and recommends changes in the correctional programs
available in the jail facility.
L. Formulates and recommends improved methods for handling data within the
programs unit.
M. Transports inmates within the secure jail facility and assists jail security
staff when it is observed that a need exists.
N. Enters the general- population pods to pull and converse with inmates
concerning programs , problem solving and the maintenance of good order
and discipline.
0. Insures appropriate security precautions are taken by members of the
counseling staff when dealing with inmates.
P. Participates as needed on in-house disciplinary board to help determine
what disciplinary action will be taken in regards to an infraction by an inmate.
Q. Maintains liaison with judges, Probation Department, District Attorney's
Office and the inmates attorney on behalf of inmate client.
R. Assists inmate clients with problem solving and liaison with the outside.
S. Coordinates public relations activities for the program unit with appropriate
staff personnel .
VI . Minimum qualifications
A. Required knowledge, skills and abilities
Considerable knowledge and ability to manage and administer counseling
programs. Considerable knowledge and ability of individual and group
counseling techniques. Knowledge of referral procedures. Considerable
knowledge of training procedures and knowledge of local in-service
training available. Considerable ability to establish and maintain
effective working relationships with employees of the Sheriff' s
Department, community business people, law enforcement, judicial and
probationary personnel and the public. Ability to supervise subordinate
personnel . Considerable ability to communicate ideas and programs
to others.
B. Education
Master's degree in Rehabilitative Counseling , Guidance and Counseling,
or related field; plus two year's experience in counseling and
supervision.
VII . pecific assJgnments
A. Administer the Programs Unit.
B. Individual Counseling
C. Family Counseling
D. Group Counseling (Support Group I)
E. Group Coordination (ARRC)
F. On-call Counselor
G. Staff Counseling and Training
H. Back-up for other staff personnel
1 . In-House Program
2. Classification/Intake
WORK RELEASE COUNSELOR
Description of Work:
I . General statement of duties :
Performs professional , supervisory, and administrative correctional
counseling work.
II . Supervision received:
Works under broad policy guidance and supervision of Director,
Correctional Programs.
III . Supervision exercised:
Supervises any correctional counseling personnel and/or interns assigned
to the Work Release Section, including scheduling, assigning duties , and
assisting the Director in employee and intern evaluations. Supervises those
inmate clients in the Work Release program.
IV. Consultation exercised:
Works as therapeutic counseling consultant to jail security personnel
concerning inmate related problems. Consults with in-house counseling
staff, Dietician , Nursing Supervisor, and other Sheriff' s Department
personnel. Consultant to judicial system concerning potential Work Release
clients.
V. Example of duties:
Duties described serve as guidelines and may include additional duties
not listed.
A. Process applications and recommendations to the courts for Work Release,
Work Seeking Release and Educational Release on the behalf of an incarcerated
individual . Maintain liaison with judges , Probation Department, District
Attorney's Office, the inmate' s attorney and other concerned community agencies.
B. Collection and distribution of Work Release fees , and ordered restitution,
court costs and fines.
C. Coordinates job development with employers and with community agencies to
develop possible placements for Work Seeking inmates. Establishs and maintains
a working relationship with the employers of the Work Release inmates to include
resolution of job related problems.
D. Performs inspections of Work Release pod to insure safety, security and
cleanliness requirements are being satisfied.
E. Plan, establish and assist in maintenance of counseling files for inmates
in Work Release and assigned general case load. Corrdinate maintenance of files
with other counseling staff and the programs secretary.
F. Serves as on-call counselor with other counseling staff during off-duty hours
and as crisis call counselor at anytime these services are required as assigned
by Programs Director.
G. Establishes and maintains working relationships with those community agencies
and employers which can provide consultation , evaluation, therapy, employment or
other social services support to assigned clients.
H. Maintains statistical data concerning referrals to Work Release, action
initiated with clients, and follow-up data. Coordinates data collection and
evaluation with records section and other support services sections.
I . Coordinate work hours of Work Release inmates with their employers and
responsible for making up a weekly schedule of those hours.
J. Assists Training Coordinator through Programs Director with in-service staff
training.
K. Serves as a contact counselor performing in-house group, individual and
crisis inmate counseling as requested or assigned.
L. Coordinates referral and evaluation process of inmate clients to Work Release
with in-house counselors.
M. Follow-up contacts with post release inmates.
N. Initiates referral process for those clients in need of social services ;
vocational development and training , or other services as provided by community
agencies.
0. Prepares budgetary requests and helps administer allowed budget.
P. Provides , as needed, counseling services to family members of assigned clients.
Q. Process furlough requests and provide psychological testing and test inter-
pretation of those clients requesting these services.
R. Transports inmates within the secure jail facility and assist jail security
staff when it is observed that a need exists.
S. Enters the general population pods to pull and converse with inmates concern-
ing programs , problem solving and maintenance of good order and discipline.
T. Insures appropriate security precautions are followed when working with
inmates.
U. Participates as needed on in-house disciplinary boards to help determine
what disciplinary action will be taken in regards to an infraction by an inmate.
V. Other such duties as assigned by the Director, Correctional Programs.
VI . Minimum qualifications :
A. Required knowledge, skills and abilities:
Considerable knowledge and ability of individual and group counseling
techniques with a special emphasis on Vocational Counseling. Consider-
able knowledge of counseling in-take procedures. Knowledge of referral
processes. Ability to establish and maintain long-term data collection
concerning services provided. Working knowledge of in-service training
procedures for para-professional counseling techniques. Considerable
ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships
with employees of Weld County Sheriff' s Department; community business
people; law enforcement, judicial and probationary personnel ; and the
public. Ability to supervise subordinate personnel .
B. Education:
Master' s degree in Rehabilitative Counseling or Counselor Education;
or social work or related field; plus one years ' s internship or
traineeships or paid work experience in a clinical setting provideing
counseling or other social services.
VII . Specific assignments
A. Administer Work Release Program
B. Contact Counselor
1 . Handle request and referrals
2. Process furloughs
3. Administer and explain tests
4. Assist inmate in problem solving
5. Liaison with attorney
6. Interview and explain programs (after 2 weeks)
C. Individual Counseling
D. Group Counseling (Support Group II )
E. Group Coordination
1 . Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)
2. GED
F. E Pod Inspections
G. On-call counselor
H. Back-up for other staff personnel
1 . Trusty Program
2. Deputy Director
IN-HOUSE COUNSELING COORDINATOR
Descrtion of Work:
I. General statement of duties:
Performs professional , supervisory and administrative correctional counseling
work.
II . Supervision received:
Works under broad policy guidance and supervision of Director, Correctional
Programs.
III . Supervision exercised:
Supervises any correctional counseling personnel and/or interns in training
assigned to In-House Counseling section, including scheduling , assigning
duties , and assisting the Director in employee and intern evaluations.
IV. Consultation exercised:
Works as therapeutic counseling consultant to jail security personnel
concerning inmate related problems. Consults with other counselors ,
Dietician, Nursing Supervisor and other Sheriff' s Department personnel
as directed. Consultation provided to judicial system concerning inmate
participation and progress in programs.
V. Examples of duties :
Duties described serve as guidelines and may include additional duties
not listed.
A. Serves as counselor coordinator available to the general inmate
population. Provides counseling services to clients by management of
in-house and community counseling resources. Answers all crisis calls
and referrals for counseling not already assigned to another member of
counseling staff.
B. Plans, establishes and assists in maintenance of in-house counseling
files. Coordinates maintenance of files with other counseling staff and
the Programs secretary.
C. Conducts initial interviews with inmates referred for counseling services.
D. Assists Director, Correctional Programs, in coordination of community
agencies providing in-house services (e.g. AA groups , family therapy, crisis
intervention) .
E. Screens , accepts/rejects and supervises counseling interns and volunteers.
Provides scheduling, assigns and supervises all initial training of intern and
volunteer personnel .
F. Establishes and maintains working relationships with community agencies
which can provide consultation, evaluations, therapy or other social services
support.
G. Maintains statistical data concerning referrals for counseling, action
initiated with clients , and follow-up data. Coordinates data collection and
evaluation with records section and other support services sections.
H. Serves as a contact counselor providing in-house group, individual and crisis
inmate counseling as requested or required. Provides counseling to Sheriff
Department staff members as requested.
I . Participates as needed on in-house disciplinary boards to help determine
what disciplinary action will be taken in regards to an infraction by an inmate.
J. Provides , as needed, counseling services to family members of assigned
clients.
K. Maintains liaison with judges, Probation Department, District Attorney's
Office and the inmates attorney on behalf of inmate clients.
L. Provides counseling and consultation services to Juvenile unit.
M. Provides weekly up dated group lists to security personnel .
N. Initiates referral process for those clients in need of services provided
by community agencies.
0. Prepares budgetary requests and helps administer allowed budget.
P. Processes furlough requests and various tests for assigned clients.
Q. Transports inmates within the secure jail facility and assists jail security
staff when it is observed that a need exists.
R. Enters the general population pods to pull and converse with inmates concern-
ing programs, problem solving and the maintenance of good order and discipline.
S. Insures appropriate security precautiofts are followed when working with inmates.
T. Participates as needed on in-house disciplinary boards to help determine what
disciplinary action will be taken in regards to an infraction by an inmate.
U. Other such duties as assigned by the Director, Correctional Programs.
VI . Minimum qualifications :
A. Required knowledge, skills and abilities :
Considerable knowledge relating to individual and group counseling
techniques. Working knowledge of referral processes.
Ability to establish and maintain counseling files. Ability to
establish long-term data collection concerning services provided.
Working knowledge of In-Service training procedures for para-professional
counseling techniques. Considerable ability to establish and maintain
effective working relationships with employees of Weld County Sheriff' s
Department; community business people; law enforcement, judicial ,
probationary personnel and the public. Ability to effectively supervise
subordinates.
B. Education:
Master' s degree in Counselor Education or Rehabilitation Counseling;
Social Work or related field, plus one year' s internship, or trainee-
ship, or paid work experience in a clinical setting providing counseling
or other social services.
C. Necessary_ special requirements :
Eligible for membership in American Personnel & Guidance Association;
or National Rehabilitation Association; or National Association of
Social Workers ; or other similar nationally recognized professional
organizations.
D. Desire, but not required abilities :
Bi-lingual in English and Spanish.
VII . Specific assignments:
A. Coordinate in-house programs
B. Contact counselor
1 . Handle requests and referrals
2. Process furloughs
3. Administer and explain tests
4. Assist inmates in problem solving
5. Liaison with attorney
6. Interview and explain programs (after 2 weeks)
C. Conduct 2nd interviews
D. Individual Counseling
E. Group Counseling
1 . Shape-up
2. Impact
3. Grupo Hispano
4. Music Group
E. Group Coordinator
1 . Health Group
2. Art classes
G. On-call counselor
H. Intern/volunteer recruitment
I . Coordinate Juvenile counseling services
J. Back-up for other staff personnel (Classification/Intake)
1 . 1st interviews
2. Move lists
3. Counselor assignment
INTAKE/CLASSIFICATION COUNSELOR
Description of duties :
I . General statement of duties :
Performs professional , supervisory and administrative correctional
counseling work.
II . Supervision received:
Works under broad policy guidance and supervision of Director, Correctional
Programs.
III . Supervision exercised:
Supervises interns and volunteers assigned to the Intake/Classification
section, including scheduling , assigning duties , and evaluation preparation.
IV. Consultation exercised:
Works as therapeutic counseling consultant to jail security personnel
concerning inmate related problems. Consults with in-house counseling
staff, Dietician , Nursing Supervisor, and other Sheriff' s Department
personnel as directed.
V. Example of duties :
Duties described serve as guidelines and may include additional duties
not listed.
A. Conducts classification screening (first) interviews for pod placement
in the jail including background checks, immediate problem solving and
referrals.
B. Performs behavioral observations of intake pod and coordinates second
interview concerning program explanation. Consults with security
personnel regarding observations.
C. Generates and distributes daily move list based upon space available ,
placement decisions and security/safety needs of the individual inmate.
D. Maintains statistical data concerning Classification/Intake to include
number of initial interviews , number of second interviews and the number of
referrals made to in-house or community counselors.
E. Plans , establishes and assist in maintenance of counseling files. Coor-
dinates the maintenance of files with other counseling staff and the Programs
secretary.
F. Serves as on-call counselor with other counseling staff during off-duty
hours and as crisis call counselor at anytime these services are required
as assigned by Programs Director.
G. Serves as a contact counselor providing in-house group, individual and
crisis inmate counseling as requested or required. Provides counseling to
Sheriff Department staff members as requested.
H. Coordinates and produces Intake/Classification grant reports and revisions.
I . Establishes and maintains a working relationship with assigned community
agencies conducting groups in the jail .
J. Initiates referral process for those clients in need of services provided
by community agencies.
K. Participates as needed on in-house disciplinary boards to help determine
what disciplinary action will be taken in regards to an infraction by an inmate.
L. Prepares budgetary requests and helps administer allowed budget.
M. Provides, as needed, counseling services to family members of assigned clients.
N. Maintains liaison with judges , Probation Department, District Attorney' s
Office and the inmates attorney on behalf of inmate clients.
0. Process furlough and testing requests for assigned clients.
P. Coordinates assignment of contact counselor with other in-house counseling
personnel .
Q. Transports inmates within the secure jail facility and assists jail security
staff when it is observed that a need exists.
R. Enters the general population pods to pull and converse with inmates concern-
ing programs , problem solving and the maintenance of good order and discipline.
S. Insures appropriate security precautions are followed when working with
inmates.
T. Other such duties as assigned by the Director, Correctional Programs.
VI . Minimum Qualifications :
A. Required knowledge, skills and abilities:
Familiarity with psychological testing devices; thorough knowledge,
skill and ability to conduct interviews; skill and ability in
counseling techniques. Ability to write accurate reports and case
notes. Ability and skill in conducting behavioral observations , and
ability in coordinating with other jail personnel in the collection
of data. Ability to communicate effectively verbally and in writing,
especially in preparing accurate reports. Ability to maintain effective
working relationships with employees, other agencies , the public and
incarcerated persons.
B. Education:
Bachelor' s degree in Psychology, Counseling, Vocational Rehabilitation,
Social Work or related field, plus one year of responsible experience
either providing direct services to clients in a counseling relationship
or conducting initial interviews in a counseling or correctional setting.
OR
Any equivalent combination of education and experience.
VII . Specific Assignments :
A. Administer the Intake/Classification Program.
B. Contact Counselor
1 . Handle requests and referrals.
2. Process furloughs
3. Administer and explain tests
4. Assist inmate in problem solving
5. Liaison with attorney
6. Interview and explain programs
C. Individual Counseling
D. Group Counseling (Support Group II )
E. Group Coordination (Horizons)
F. Initial Counselor assignment
G. On-call counselor
H. Back-up for other staff personnel
1 . Work Release
2. Trusty Program
PROGRAMS COUNSELOR
Description of Work:
I . General statement of duties :
Performs professional, supervisory and administrative correctional counseling
work.
II . Supervision received:
Works under broad policy guidance and supervision of Director, Correctional
Programs.
III . Supervision exercised:
Administratively supervises Trusty inmates assigned to the Programs
section and coordinates their job assignments with other department
personnel . Supervises interns or volunteers assigned to the programs
section including scheduling, assigning duties and evaluation preparation.
IV. Consultation exercised:
Works as therapeutic counseling consultant to jail security personnel
concerning inmate related problems. Consults with in-house counseling
staff, Dietician , Nursing Supervisor and other Sheriff' s Department
personnel as directed. Consultant to judicial system concerning potential
Trusty candidates.
V. Example of duties:
Duties described serve as guidelines and may include additional duties
not listed.
A. Plan , establish and assist in maintenance of counseling files for
inmates in the Trusty program and assigned general case load. Coordinate
maintenance of files with other counseling staff and the programs secretary.
B. Serves as on-call counselor with other counseling staff during off-duty
hours and as crisis call counselor at anytime these services are required
as assigned by Programs Director.
C. Establishes and maintains a working relationship with community
agencies which can provide consultation, evaluation, therapy or groups
in the jail and other social service support to assigned clients. Also
maintains liaison with judges , Probation Department, District Attorney' s Office
and the inmates attorney on behalf of inmate clients.
D. Maintains statistical data concerning referrals to the Trusty Program,
action initiated with clients and follow-up data. Coordinates data collection
and evaluation with programs records section and other support services section.
Designs forms for use in programs unit.
E. Maintains roster and work schedules of Trusty inmates.
F. Maintains release date information for all trusties and relays to security
personnel .
G. Performs in-house group and individual counseling as assigned.
H. Acts as contact counselor for problem resolution for trusty and general
population inmates assigned.
I . Coordinates referral and selection process of inmate clients to the Trusty
program with in-house counselors and security staff.
J. Makes trusty job assignments and assigns good time and trusty time
through on going evaluations.
K. Initiates referral process for those clients in need of social services
or other services provided by community agencies.
L. Prepares budgetary requests and helps administer allowed budget.
M. Board member on both employee oral boards and inmate disciplinary
boards.
N. Provides , as needed, counseling services to family members of assigned
clients.
0. Provides follow-up contact with released inmates as required.
P. Performs inspections of Trusty Pod to insure safety, security and
cleanliness requirements are being satisfied.
Q. Process furlough requests and tests for assigned clients.
R. Maintain the inmate library and ensure compliance with current regulations
regarding issuing and turning in books.
S. Transports inmates within the secure jail facility and assists jail
security staff when it is observed that a need exists.
T. Enters the general population pods to pull and converse with inmates
concerning programs , problem solving, services and the maintenance of good
order and discipline.
U. Insures appropriate security precautions are followed when working with
inmates.
V. Provides staff counseling upon request or as need is observed.
W. Other such duties as assigned by the Director, Correctional Programs.
VI . Minimum qualifications:
A. Required knowledge, skills and abilities:
Thorough knowledge of counseling and guidance principles and practice;
working knowledge of available support services ; ability to relate to
and advise participants concerning available programs; ability to
communicate effectively orally and in writing; ability to coordinate
with other jail personnel and in maintaining an effective working
relationship with other employees , other agencies, the public and
incarcerated persons.
B. Education:
Bachelor' s degree in Psychology, Counseling, Vocational Rehabilitation,
Social Work or related field, plus one year of responsible experience
either providing direct services to clients in a counseling relationship
or conducting interviews in a counseling or correctional setting.
OR
Any equivalent combination of education and experience.
VII . Specific Assignments :
A. Administer Trusty program.
B. Contact Counselor
1 . Handle requests and referrals
2. Process furloughs
3. Administer and explain tests
4. Assistinmate in problem solving
5. Liaison with attorney
6. Interview and explain programs (after 2 weeks)
C. Individual Counseling
D. Group Counseling
1 . Support Group I
2. Vocational skills class
E. Librarian
F. F Pod Inspections
G. On-call counselor
H. Assistant Juvenile Coordinator for the Programs Unit.
I. Back-up for other staff personnel .
1 . Work Release Counselor
2. Intake/Classification
SL,.KL;AKY : J
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
General Statement of Duties: Performs a variety of complex secretarial
work requiring confidentiality and an extensive use of independent judg-
ment.
Supervision Received: Works under general guidance and direction of an
administrative superior.
Supervision Exercised: Serves as lead worker over clerical personnel as
assigned.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES (Any one position may not include all of the duties
listed nor do the listed examples include all duties which may be found
in positions of this class. )
Serves as personal assistant to one or more administrative staff
members of a county department; attends public meetings, takes and
transcribes notes, minutes and confidential dictation; examines
transcripts, reports and correspondence for accuracy and complet-
ness which requires an extensive exercise of independent judgment.
Composes routine correspondence; prepares financial reports as
directed and other material from general instructions or records.
Collects and accounts for fees; maintains departmental expense
accounts; prepares requisitions , invoices, budgetary accounts
and purchase orders as appropriate; makes up leave reports and
other personnel documents as required.
Screens incoming correspondence and responds when appropriate; re-
fers inquires to staff members with relevant attachments or notes.
meetings; keeps informed of new laws , ordinances, policies ,
and procedures and implements changes as directed.
Receives telephone and personal callers; handles questions and
complaints , refers callers requiring further information to appro-
priate staff members; sets up and confirms appointments, meetings
and other arrangements as required.
Establishes and maintains filing system, controls records and in-
dexes.
Relays complaints or other calls to personnel in the field, or
other locations using two-way radio or telephone.
Trains and reviews the work of lower level clerical staff as
assigned; recommends appropriate corrections to ensure accuracy
and completness of work.
- Operates a variety of office equipment.
Responsible in the interest of the county, utilizing independent judgment
to hire, dismiss, discipline, reward or adjust grievance of subordinate
employees or effectively recommend the same.
Performs related work as required.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Required Knowledges, Skills and Abilities: Thorough knowledge of spelling,
punctuation and grammar. Considerable knowledge of modern office practices,
procedures and equipment. Working knowledge of bookkeeping procedures and
filing techniques. Some knowledge of administrative practices and procedures.
Skill in taking and transcribing dictation as required. Skill in the opera-
SECRETARY IV Page 2
in their work. Ability to perform a variety of secretarial duties requiring
an extensive exercise of 'independent judgment. Ability to communicate effect-
"- ively verbally and in writing. Ability to establish and maintain effective
working relationships with employees, other departments, agencies and the
public.
Education: High school graduation or equivalent with course work in short-
hand, typing and office and business practices as required by the position.
Experience: One year increasingly responsible experience as or in a pos-
ition equivalent to Secretary III.
OR
Any equivalent combination of education and experience.
•
SECRETARY IV . Page 3
W H O
X H E
HC)z
H T
0
x z ea
u 0 0 -o
a) H a C)
El
GO L
cn
m
N 0 Z G
.n H ❑
CO W0 •.+H}. H V
N 0 C N a)
H � Z d 6
a G
o > X rn G
C • U L C)Vl C ,
CD d
w 3
v
a) W
G C Cl
0 ll
N Cr) a 7
•H UI _ L 41
0 H G
H C)
H a) u
t C ., A O
0 m L
r a u
fr., y a)
x an .H }+
I u Z o'
N ❑ O N •H
1CZ
I • Q 0 r- 0
1-1 4 1 r N • U O
Cr) L a) L
C1 X
H r —
I N• O W •q L W
L. I 0 i a, TN
z .G Hl m
I H L L
L u E
X I o • -+ m co
H 001 > N L,
on
a) I N V Ol a.> -c•r4 o> H Cr) ^ G 'C O
OD U O I I F .+
ca H
•D O V 3 r v
s, H I L
CU W E F I a) (/) L
.+ O
a Ia cC. I a a
, O w a m
x I 0 I - u v u,
O S+ }+
DD C H
0 0
G O >,H
L — _ _ _I_ - Cr) a) cn
t. UI
Z O •
>
.,+ j a)
L 0 -.1‘ L O
L 0 al to ro u
a) V 1p •,i }+
• Y -4
N G m .+
•Hi• 6 0 X • G N
4 C Cr) L •.1 y.
N O •.
X O r/1 •a H
O CO
z a x
CO 1.
C •H O
O 3
H T
0 sa E
Cr) co N
C L o
H O) W
• H u ar
O H H Cn a a H ri
W v a N ,-i
N Cr) .G •H
a 0 3
m
•.+ C co -Ix
.-+ v a x
Cl l- -X
N Cr)
cri N •
ti L
Cl
• Cr)
a w
a W
C
x
APPENDIX VIII
Inter Office Communication
F._
Date February 25 , 1980
TO: Lt rnlp And rpt Mat7gr-r'
FROM: Cody Wathen
RE: Remodeling 3rd Floor Chapel
It has come to my attention that there is a very large and valuable
space that is essentially unusable because of the access from G Max
into the 3rd floor chapel . With a minimal amount of expenditure, the
space could be used for various activities from counseling to group
work to contact visits and for the purpose of any crafts that might
be used in the facility. I would propose that the following alterations
be made in the structure of the facility to facilitate the use of that
space.
(1) The door between G Max and the chapel be removed.
(2) In the space where the door was, a threshold or
door sill be installed of some metal .
— (3) A piece of /4 inch fabricated boiler plate will be'
placed and tacked in the door jam.
• (4) Two pieces of reinforcing rod will be welded in an X
pattern on top of the boiler plate for reinforcement.
(5) A hole will be cut in the wall between the hall and chapel
on the west wall . A jam will be installed in the hole.
The door which was removed between G Max and the chapel
will be installed in that jam such that it swings to the
right when opened into the chapel . It will open against
the glass partition. _
(6) The windows will be painted black on the inside. This is
to prevent visability between G Max and the chapel .
(7) The monies for this will come from the Classification/Intake
grant and will be justified by Mr. Wathen. I would like to
recommend that I pursue this by establishing a bidding pro-
cedure with your permission.
(8) A food chute similar to the one added to the G intake side will
be constructed and added between the satellite add the G max.
It will replace one concrete block (aonrox: ]F"Xn"l, and have
a hinged door which will swing down into the guard's office.
Cody W then
Director of Correctional Programs
CW/db
cc: Cpt. (Metzger
•
1-- Third Floor Modification
•
3rd Floor Hallway
•
Doorway to be added
G Maximum
using door from
G max to room •
Door to be blocked
with metal plate 3rd Floor Chapel
Food Chute Added
windows
3rd Floor Guard's Rooth
•
APPENDIX IX
WELD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT '
Inter Office Communication
Date January S. 19R1
TO: SECURITY •
FROM: Classification/Intake
RE: Placement of inmates in the
overcrowded situation
Given the frequent occurence of an overflow of people in holding (particularly on
weekends) , I recognize the need for Security to relieve the overcrowdedness by making
some moves directly from holding to the pods prior to the screening done by classifi-
cation. I have no objection to this, however, I'd like to explain the classification
system under which we are operating, so that moves will not be made randomly.
I believe fewer problems will be encountered if a more selective pod assignment could
be established. If at all possible, then, please try to use the following criteria
-- when moving people into a pod:
B Pod - Younger in age and maturity; not experienced in jails; victim-type;
serving short mittimus (1-15 days)
C Pod - Somewhat experienced in jail system; not problematic; cooperative
D Pod - Con wise "old-timers"; sentenced for lengthy period of time; older
in age and maturity
G-Intake - Should be used for intake only. It is not to be a permanent
residence pod. For those inmates who cannot be placed in B, C,
or D for whatever reason, please move them to MAX.
I appreciate your help!
MM/dr
1/8/81
Reply Requested Yes ( ) No T74
•
830-79-045
—,'7,-„-7.1-7:-•,r'
i e,"^ p44.4.,.. 5,74 y/ i rte° `y
-III -ie vl ss� sY`
_ J d ¢y„ t.— r;. a ,"±P`a #:*w7 ram C 3 r C _ .. ._..
N
,..a `Cr�'+'le .w:x's3., sh ,a4*lit ,4".n.Vf bfit Nc9E n a .e.•, - .
yy��y�4 n,�Ly{.yi (, rJ
r t Shy.-jar. " -t hoc" t LeU`. F -4f--AW, , d Y „ -/-
�. x .s 'r?N 4$i § .t.... -a, x
11. . i4 4 y y,, 4t.y.ra. .L 1.r
r f 44 N, 5. ,- 'k• t , ' <14'. j TT
"' L. tt t i W s (x.?k7, 'rC'3 I a' -
I g -L.7 a ,..,. .. ,„,,.8& ,xx •q%+.� v� tae c 4 ,tIcli i-.en'4 � via
4`4 "fi s tk e 3 a r r m 0 e 2s 4 47,24:.'f4.1"' �k`" 7-."444: —:44 if,: �
4it t, ;4;i0lr- L .'slew .+ A}�
x it r 'Fx` ' t.
;t
• ' Jail wilt motto _�
i '' to several
Weld County Jail inmates Marrbeth Ikeda, left, and :chapel, and the women have sent, the poem
' Irene Acosta show the
motto they recently wrote 10 their publications. They have:founded an inmate self-help pro-
group program at the Rely Canty Jail Jail officials gave gram'inthe jail,and officials agree the program has helped
themperml trtthe amity slatanof the jall several inmates.(Tribune photo by Mike Peters),
'Who needs a deg r T
. ,; .- �program� helps -.
tnjmates sayR
By]I M PETERS problems of the group members would never had before. We think It's work-
TribeStafl titer be held in confidence."Anything that,
m s ig,'.
Irene has been in the Weld County said in this room, stays in this room' Acosta maintains her life has been
Jail two months, awailag extradition she said."We don't talk about others' more of an "education" than any
to Maryland to face charges of peg problems outside the chapel." degree in counseling could be:
bad checks " program, which the women "I have a degree in life," she said.
The For her,life has been a attain mix- describe as a self-help session,involves "I've had the experiences of a woman
ture of alcohol, drug ad barmy pro• the prisoners who want to work on their of 100 years Who the hell needs a
blems.This is herfn st time hi jail- problems with others,simply by"talk- degree to help someone MaribethRoorda s inthe bell jafl a - big them out"The women have devil Along with her experiences with life
t stemming hm an incident in ed a program,where a prisoner wwillen the street, Acosta also cites her re
heft
Latimer"County.She is a the Weld Jail start oounelevel—Level A-and then cent work in Washington,D.C.
on a hold imbiber trial'shad pied to tau other levels where the "Last year I was a director of a drug-
ab
Maribeth also said she has ex- s g and confidentiality becomes use program in D.C.and ran a home
perimented with drug and alcohol and r intense. When the member which had 46 offenders. We used the
comes from abr'okenhome. reaches the third level,he is ready to - same methods there that we're using
Two women with those backgrounds leave the jail and face his problems on here, so I know it works. Of the 60
would hardly be expected to bring a the outside,according to the women. graduates from that program In one
new kind of hope through a jail pro- year,we had only two repeaters."
gram. But, according to jail officials Acosta and Roorda are the only Both believe they will soon be rebels-
and counselors, Irene Acosta and women in the present group of eight. ed from custody. Acosta has several
Martbeth Roorda have combined their Other prisoners are interested int join- recommendations from local officials
experiences and talents a oommunica- lag the group but they will have to wait which she will take with her when she's
tions and have helped not only urtl there's an opening, or until the extradicted to Maryland this month.
themselves but several other jail in- present group moves on to the second She said those letters should help her to
mates. And, according to the women. level. receive a"quick release.Roorda was to
they plan to bring the program outside "We want the group to remain appear in court next week,and local of-
the jail soon and work to pre'vnt others small," Acosta said, because it's die- ficials said this week the will probably
from making the mistakes they have fruit for someone to share their pro- be released on probation.
made. Meals with a large number ot people." After they are released from jail,
The two women didn't know each If a prisoner is interested in the both women hope to return to Greeley
other a few months ago.They and in the group,be won't be allowed to join until and begin working with people in trou-
women's section of the jail. Since that be is screened by the jail counselors, ble.
time, they've developed a program le tbewomen said.They agreed that there "We want to get an old house to use
which prisoners are able to help are some prisoners who may not fit into for our program,"Roorda said. "We'll
themselves and others Stough soaring a sharing group.or would have difficul- get jobs to work so we can make a living
experiences and ideas in a private ty in keeping the confidentiality of the while we try to set up a program.If we
group. member's problems.However,none of can get the courts involved,maybe we
"We meet once each week."Acosta the applicants has been turned away. 'can open up a rehabilitation center. I
said, 'and here W the,al capel we s:: Neither of the women have a degree aunt to work with high school kids and
in a circle and _-are ,. Lot:g::ts anc in psycholog_. or counseling. and they Irene is interested in working with
problem:. It seers Lie there Isn't a berth agree the degree isn't needed. alcohol and drug abusers."
problem hrouzb: :hi: that semette else •Tr:s could be called a group therapy The women both hold as their
hasn't beenth.ro scarier. tut we don't try to work into "ultimate goal" the publication of a
While it ',4 as c'!:cti• a: firs: for .he ps:choioz:cal areas," Acosta said book about them,their experiences and
gr e .em.-..es :. ".c= has a oa i au n d theirprogram.
' :-:. - - ri::us. 'build a They already have a title selected
� '
PART 2 - FISCAL REPORT
Revised 9/77
COLORADO DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
LEAA PROJECT CASH REQUEST
FORM 14
Subgrantee Project Number Date
WELD COUNTY ,COLORADO 79-10C-(1)-C2-23 2/3/81
Project Title Make Warrant Payable To:
INTAKE CLASSIFICATION WELD COUNTY COLORADO
Duration Address
From 10/1/79 To 12/31/80 P.O, BOX 759
CEY COLORADO 80632
1. Federal Award $ 49 500 Subgrantee Match $ 13.750
2. Received To Date $ 31,000 Received to Date $ 12.592
3. Requested Not Yet Received $ -0- Subgrantee Balance $ 1.158
4. Amount of this Request $3
5. Total Lines 2, 3, 4 $ 5,760
6. Federal Balance (Line 1'
Less Line 5) $ 3,740
7. Estimated Expenditures Month of 2/81 $ 1 440
8. Less: Estimated Cash Beginning Month $(13,662)
II^ 9. Total Cash Needs for Month $ 15,062
10. Less: Estimated Cash--Subgrantee Match $ _ 302
11. Project Income $ -0-
12. Other $ -U-
13. Total Lines 10, 11, 12 $ 302
14. Federal Cash Requested (Line 9 Less:Line 13) $ 1A ,760
(1.%) D1i 4
Project Dir or
TWO SIGNED COPIES OF THIS FORM SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO DCJ BY THE 10TH. STATE AGENCIES
MUST ATTACH AN INTERAGENCY VOUCHER` IN THE AMOUNT OF THE REQUEST.
DCJ Approval $
Amount Finance Officer Date
Voucher Number _ Date
DCJ Denial Reason:
•
Signature
COLORADO DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE -.1
/
SUBGRANT FISCAL REPORT
•
FORM 8R
._.1 Subgrantee Project Number Date
WELD COUNTY COLORADO - • 79-10C-(1)-C2-23 2/3/81
Project Title Type of Report Report Sequence
INTAKE CLASSIFICATION Progress Ix 1 Final I I 5
'Project Duration Report Period •
From 1n/1/7g To 12/31./80 10/1/80 T'0 12/31/80
AWARD STATUS Federal Subgrantee Buy-In Other State TOTAL
Match Funds -
Award 49.500 13.750 2,750 66,000
Cash Received 31.000 X592 2,750 . 46,342
Balance 18,500 1,158 -0- 19,b.bo
•
FOR DIVISION 'OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE USE ONLY
J.E. # FY DATE FUND ACTION CODE AGENCY # ABL ORG. UNIT
K85 1001 32 - 00
..-EXPENDITURES
Expend. - Expend-
Begin- DCJ itures Expend- Unpaid
Approved ningrof Use This itures Oblig- ' CCU
Budget Category Budget Quarter • AC ' Quarter-1752 To-.Date , ;dtians(1753) Use
Personnel 59.569 46,213.13 13100 8,304.07 54,517.20 61
Supplies and ()per. 2.681 2,611.89 —13200 2,682.13 i 5,294.U2 • 61
Travel . 250 152.64 13300 -U- 152.64 :j61
Equipment 13400 - 6'i
Construction 3,500 -0- 13500 -U- -0- 1.44I. III 6
°
Consultants 13600
C 00000
TOTAL 66 000 48 977.66 19996 10,986.20 59,963.86 1,,440.00 .62
Federal Share 75 % 49,500 36 733. 2 00 , . • " 1,, ... .
Match Share 21 % 13.750 - 10,285.31 2 100 439.45 . 12,592.41 = 302.40 b2
Buy-In % 23100 62 '
Other State '
Funds 4 % 2,750 1,959.10 2,307.10 2,398.55 57.60
TOTAL 100% 66,000 48,977.66 C2gg96 000
10,986.20 59,963.86 61
1.44n nn
CASH BALANCE
Cash Balance Beginning of Quarter $ ( 4,942.36)
Receipts During Quarter $ 2,307 10 .
Expenditures During Quarter $ (10.986 20)
Cash Balance End of Quarter $ (11 621 46)
I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief this report is correct and complete
and that all expenditures and unpaid obligations are for the purposes set forth in the
grant award documents.
PAUL SWEARENGIN 356-4000 EXT 4/i4
Report Prepared By Phone Project i r: o is Signature
MAIL TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM TO DCJ AND ONE COPY TO YOUR REGIONAL PLANNER BY THE 15TH
AY OF THE MONTH AFTER THE CALENDAR QUARTER. DUE DATES ARE APRIL 15, JULY 15, OCTOBER 15,
AND -. ANUARY 15.
*****SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE*****
SIDE BEFORE FILLING OUT FORM
PART 3 - ABSTRACT
WELD COUNTY INTAKE/CLASSIFICATION PROJECT
GRANT NUMBER: 79-10C-(1)-C2-C3 (Continuation of Grant Number 77-AGE-
10C-C2-119
SPONSOR: Weld County Sheriff' s Department
TYPE OF PROJECT: Development of an Intake/Classification System in the
Weld County Jail
TARGET AREA/GROUP: Inmate population of the Weld County Jail
TOTAL FUNDING: First Year - $57 ,468.00 ($51 ,721 .00 Federal ; $5,747.00
Subgrantee Match)
Second Year - $66,000.23 ($49,500.00 Federal ; $13,750.23
Subgrantee Match; $2,750.00 other State funds)
YEAR OF FUNDING: Second Year
CONTINUATION STATUS: To be continued using State and County funds
COST RATIO: Not applicable
STAFF/CLIENT RATIO: Not applicable
REPORTING PERIOD: August 1 , 1978 through December 31 , 1980
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this project was to develop a model
intake/classification system. This included screening
inmates for placement based on criminal history, coun-
selor interviews , arrestee input, and Security observa-
tions. The project was also responsible for making
community referrals to inmates and their families, for
providing counseling services in specific areas of need,
and for establishing and maintaining contact with other
agencies concerned with classification and/or inmate
services. All of these tasks were to be undertaken by
the Programs Staff with the help of interns and volun-
teers. In addition, a data collection system was to be
instituted for the compilation of data concerning the
offender population.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS:
Objective 1: Classify on an ongoing basis an average daily population
of approximately 90-100 inmates.
Results : Of the 6,617 people arrested during the second year,
approximately 15%, or 905, remained in jail longer than
five days (which is the alloted time given for classif-
ication to a permanent pod) . Second interviews were
given to 424 of these 905, or 47%.
Objective 2: Complete 1,200 initial intake interviews.
Results: During the first year of the grant 837 initial interviews
were conducted (70%) . There were 1 ,428 interviews com-
pleted the second year ( 119%) . Averaging both years
together, we accomplished 94% of this objective.
Objective 3: Provide 200 referrals to community agencies providing
post release services.
Results: There were 316 referrals made in the second year (158%
of the objective) .
Objective 4: To utilize various instruments to measure the effects
of services provided by in-house staff and community
agencies to inmates incarcerated in the Weld County Jail .
Results: This objective was deleted prior to the approval of the
grant.
Objective 5: To provide pre-release planning to 130 inmates.
Results: Pre-release planning sessions were conducted with 479
inmates , an achievement of 368% of the objective.
Objective 6: To provide community referrals such as family counseling,
child care, and employment assistance to the families
of 25 inmates.
Results: During the first year 42 families received referrals
( 168%) . There were 53 (212%) referrals made in the
second year, thus , in two years a total of 95 referrals
were made for an average of 190% achievement of the
objective.
Objective 7: To maintain a comprehensive data base on all persons
booked into and incarcerated at the Weld County Jail .
Results : Demographic information is collected on all arrestees
through the use of the SPSS package. Some psychologi-
cal data is obtained during the second interview, but
we are reaching only 47% of the people who remain longer
than five days , thus , this objective has been partially
met.
Objective 8: To develop and implement a community volunteer program.
Results : Excellent rapport is maintained with the Rehabilitation
Department at the University of Northern Colorado. Many
interns and practicum students have worked at the jail
while earning college credit, totaling 3,085 hours of
time. In addition, volunteers donated 516 hours to the
jail .
Objective 9: To provide counseling and preparation to those inmates
who will be transferred to the Colorado Department of
Corrections from the Weld County Jail and who request
such help.
Results: Twenty-three counseling sessions were held during the
first year dealing pith inmates who were to be trans-
ferred to Canon City, Pueblo State Hospital , or Buena
Vista. There were 47 such sessions during the second
year, for a total of 70 for the life of the grant.
Objective 10: To establish and/or maintain contact and coordination
with state and other county correctional agencies having
similar interests in the field of classification and
inmate services.
Results: The Programs Unit is known and respected by many agencies
who provide services to inmates. During the first year
98 contacts were made with such agencies. There were
576 contacts in the second year, for a total of 674.
Objective 11: To develop inmate involvement in the design and the
delivery of services offered or coordinated by the
Programs Unit.
Results: Inmates have access to an Inmate Request/Complaint Form
for voicing problems , concerns or suggestions. Inmate
Council Meetings are held twice a month for the same
purpose. These are both instrumental in providing inmate
involvement and services.
Objective 12: To develop security line staff involvement in the evalua-
tion of services offered or coordinated by the Programs
Unit.
Results: The security staff is involved in the classification pro-
cess. In addition , a thorough training class has been
suggested to increase their understanding of the classif-
ication system, as well as the activities of the Programs
Unit in general . It is hoped this class will take place
and that an evaluative questionnaire will be distributed
at that time.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT: The new 4.5 million dollar Weld County Jail, which opened
in March of 1978, was in desperate need of a classification
system that would not only meet specific federal require-
ments but would also meet the needs of those incarcerated.
This system has been developed. We are separating maximum
security inmates from the general population, and we are
identifying and separating problematic behaviors through
the use of interviews and Security observations. Of the
10,715 people booked into the jail during the two and a
half year period of the grant, 2 ,265 first interviews and
424 second interviews were completed for a total of 2 ,689
interviews. This is approximately 25% of the total
number booked.
In addition, the needs and concerns of the individual
are also being dealt with. Referrals to outside agencies
are made both to inmates and their families (316 referrals
were made to inmates, which was 158% of the objective.
Families of inmates received 95 referrals , or 190% of
the objective) . Inmates are also receiving counseling
while incarcerated. There were 479 inmates participating
in some type of pre-release planning/counseling which was
368% of the objective. 70 inmates who were to be trans-
ferred to the penitentiary also received counseling in
preparation for the transition. Many groups and programs
are offered in the jail and approximately 25% of the
inmates participate in them.
All of these factors encourage a supportive and positive
environment for inmates. This stability is necessary
in order for intervention in criminal behavior to take
place.
Hello