The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20260533 INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Scott and Marianne Purcell Case Number USR25-0022 Submitted or Prepared Prior to At Hearing Hearing 1 Terrell Clarence Washington, email submitted March 3, 2026 X I hereby certify that the four items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing. Angela Snyder March 3, 2026 EXHIBIT Angela Snyder a � 1 From: Kris Ranslem Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2026 7:23 AM To: Angela Snyder Subject: FW: Notice of Public Hearing: USR25-0022 Attachments: CHARACTER STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION .pdf; BBB- Bed n Biscuit.pdf Importance: High Good morning, Received this at the last moment for USR25-0022. From:Terrell Washington <terrellwashington555@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 3, 2026 1:30 AM To: Karla Ford <kford@weld.gov> Cc: Esther Gesick<egesick@weld.gov>; PCTechs<PCTechs@co.weld.co.us> Subject: Notice of Public Hearing: USR25-0022 This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information,clicking links,or downloading attachments until their identify is verified. CHARACTER STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION Public Hearing Docket No. USR 25-0022 Re: Special Use Review — Bed and Biscuit Inn Applicants: Scott and Marianne Purcell I Keenesburg, Colorado Submitted by: Terrell Clarence Washington San Antonio, Texas United States Army Veteran Former NSA Colorado Analyst, Buckley Air Force Base Date: 03/03/2026 I. BASIS FOR TESTIMONY I am submitting this statement as a matter of public record in opposition to the character and fitness of Scott and Marianne Purcell to operate a commercial animal care facility serving the public. i I am a United States Army veteran with a background in intelligence analysis, having served at the National Security Agency, Colorado, stationed at Buckley Air Force Base. My professional training required me to observe, assess, and document behavioral patterns with precision and objectivity. I do not make this statement lightly, nor do I make it without a sustained basis of personal observation spanning several years. I have had direct, repeated, and prolonged personal dealings with Scott and Marianne Purcell. That relationship has afforded me an unobstructed view of their private conduct, their communication patterns, and the gap that exists between the public image they project and the character they demonstrate in private. II. PATTERN OF DECEPTIVE CONDUCT It is my considered testimony that Scott and Marianne Purcell present a carefully maintained public image of respectability, warmth, and community standing. However, my sustained personal experience with this family reveals a consistent and deliberate pattern of evasion, selective dishonesty, and manipulation when their personal interests are at stake. Specifically, I have observed and experienced the following: 1. Deliberate evasion of direct communication.* On multiple occasions spanning several years, the Purcells have employed indirect, anonymous, or obstructed means of communication rather than engaging transparently and in good faith. This is not an isolated occurrence but a practiced pattern. 1. Selective presentation of facts. The Purcells demonstrate a capacity to present themselves publicly as cooperative, reasonable, and forthcoming while simultaneously withholding material information from parties who have a legitimate interest in receiving it. This selective honesty is, in my assessment, more calculated than accidental. 1. Use of social standing to deflect accountability. Their standing in the community appears to function not merely as a reflection of genuine character, but as a shield against scrutiny. Reputable appearance has, in my direct experience, been leveraged to avoid accountability rather than to demonstrate it. III. RELEVANCE TO THIS APPLICATION A commercial kennel housing sixty animals is not simply a business — it is a public trust. Families will leave animals they love in the care of these operators, trusting them to be transparent about conditions, incidents, and the wellbeing of animals in their custody. The fitness to hold that public trust requires more than a pleasant public demeanor. It requires integrity in private conduct, honest communication under pressure, and accountability when things go wrong. Based on my direct personal knowledge of Scott and Marianne Purcell over an extended period, I do not believe their private conduct reflects the integrity required to responsibly operate a facility of this nature and scale. The same patterns of evasion and selective accountability I have personally witnessed are precisely the traits that become consequential when an animal is injured, when a customer is misled, or when a regulatory inquiry arises. 2 IV. REQUEST I respectfully request that this statement be entered into the official public record in its entirety and that the reviewing Board give appropriate weight to the testimony of a private citizen with direct, sustained personal knowledge of the applicants' character. The public deserves operators whose private conduct matches their public presentation. Based on everything I have personally witnessed, I do not believe the Purcells meet that standard. I have included a pdf copy for convenience and thank you for your consideration. May God Bless You All and Peace be with You. Thank You. Respectfully submitted, Terrell Clarence Washington San Antonio, Texas 571-551-1158 Terrellwashington555©gmail.com Please see attached: 1. PDF Copy 2. copy BBB Complaint 3 CHARACTER STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION Public Hearing Docket No. USR 25-0022 Re: Special Use Review— Bed and Biscuit Inn Applicants: Scott and Marianne Purcell I Keenesburg, Colorado Submitted by: Terrell Clarence Washington San Antonio, Texas United States Army Veteran Former NSA Colorado Analyst, Buckley Air Force Base Date: 03/03/2026 I. BASIS FOR TESTIMONY I am submitting this statement as a matter of public record in opposition to the character and fitness of Scott and Marianne Purcell to operate a commercial animal care facility serving the public. I am a United States Army veteran with a background in intelligence analysis, having served at the National Security Agency, Colorado, stationed at Buckley Air Force Base. My professional training required me to observe, assess, and document behavioral patterns with precision and objectivity. I do not make this statement lightly, nor do I make it without a sustained basis of personal observation spanning several years. I have had direct, repeated, and prolonged personal dealings with Scott and Marianne Purcell. That relationship has afforded me an unobstructed view of their private conduct, their communication patterns, and the gap that exists between the public image they project and the character they demonstrate in private. II. PATTERN OF DECEPTIVE CONDUCT It is my considered testimony that Scott and Marianne Purcell present a carefully maintained public image of respectability, warmth, and community standing. However, my sustained personal experience with this family reveals a consistent and deliberate pattern of evasion, selective dishonesty, and manipulation when their personal interests are at stake. Specifically, I have observed and experienced the following: 1. Deliberate evasion of direct communication.* On multiple occasions spanning several years, the Purcells have employed indirect, anonymous, or obstructed means of communication rather than engaging transparently and in good faith. This is not an isolated occurrence but a practiced pattern. 1. Selective presentation of facts. The Purcells demonstrate a capacity to present themselves publicly as cooperative, reasonable, and forthcoming while simultaneously withholding material information from parties who have a legitimate interest in receiving it. This selective honesty is, in my assessment, more calculated than accidental. 1. Use of social standing to deflect accountability. Their standing in the community appears to function not merely as a reflection of genuine character, but as a shield against scrutiny. Reputable appearance has, in my direct experience, been leveraged to avoid accountability rather than to demonstrate it. III. RELEVANCE TO THIS APPLICATION A commercial kennel housing sixty animals is not simply a business — it is a public trust. Families will leave animals they love in the care of these operators, trusting them to be transparent about conditions, incidents, and the wellbeing of animals in their custody. The fitness to hold that public trust requires more than a pleasant public demeanor. It requires integrity in private conduct, honest communication under pressure, and accountability when things go wrong. Based on my direct personal knowledge of Scott and Marianne Purcell over an extended period, I do not believe their private conduct reflects the integrity required to responsibly operate a facility of this nature and scale. The same patterns of evasion and selective accountability I have personally witnessed are precisely the traits that become consequential when an animal is injured, when a customer is misled, or when a regulatory inquiry arises. IV. REQUEST I respectfully request that this statement be entered into the official public record in its entirety and that the reviewing Board give appropriate weight to the testimony of a private citizen with direct, sustained personal knowledge of the applicants' character. The public deserves operators whose private conduct matches their public presentation. Based on everything I have personally witnessed, I do not believe the Purcells meet that standard. I have included a pdf copy for convenience and thank you for your consideration. May God Bless You All and Peace be with You. Thank You. Respectfully submitted, Terrell Clarence Washington San Antonio, Texas 571-551-1158 Terrellwashington555@gmail.com BBB, Powered by data. Driven by trust. File a Complaint Feedback from consumers is vital to BBB. We appreciate your willingness to report this information to us. We look forward to helping you and the business work toward a resolution. Your complaint details: Business Headquarters First name: Terrell Location 9 4158 County Rd 59, Last name: Washington Keenesburg, CO 80643 Email: Terrellwashington555©gmail.com to (720) 336-5305 Phone: 2105406829 Street address: If you have any questions or State: concerns, please contact the BBB assigned to your City: complaint: BBB serving Northern Zip: 78108 Colorado and Wyoming Country: USA 9 8020 S. County Road 5, Suite 100 Description of complaint: Fort Collins, CO 80528 I am submitting this statement as a matter of public record in opposition to the character and fitness of Scott and tio (970) 484-1348 We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking "Accept All Cookies", you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more. I.U11111IUI11C.al101I pa nut Ilb, dl IU LIIC yap LI!di CAIJIJ UULVVCCII the public image they project and the character they demonstrate in private. PATTERN OF DECEPTIVE CONDUCT It is my considered testimony that Scott and Marianne Purcell present a carefully maintained public image of respectability, warmth, and community standing. However, my sustained personal experience with this family reveals a consistent and deliberate pattern of evasion, selective dishonesty, and manipulation when their personal interests are On multiple occasions spanning several years, the Purcells have employed indirect, anonymous, or obstructed means of communication rather than engaging transparently and in good faith. This is not an isolated occurrence but a practiced pattern. 2. Selective presentation of facts. The Purcells demonstrate a capacity to present themselves publicly as cooperative, reasonable, and forthcoming while simultaneously withholding material information from parties who have a legitimate interest in receiving it. This selective honesty is, in my assessment, more calculated than accidental. 3. Use of social standing to deflect accountability. Their standing in the community appears to function not merely as a reflection of genuine character, but as a shield against scrutiny. Reputable appearance has, in my direct experience, been leveraged to avoid accountability rather than to demonstrate it. Desired settlement: No settlement requested - for BBB information only Does your complaint involve a health issue?: No • I have read and agree to the Complaint Submission Terms. • I authorize the business to communicate with BBB about my complaint and disclose to BBB any personal information related to the complaint including the following if applicable: (a) information about a transaction or payment, (b) student records, and (c) information about an alleged debt • I consent to the collection, use, and disclosure of my personal information in accordance with the BBB Privacy Policy, which I have read and understand. Signature: Date: © 2026. All Rights Reserved. Continued on next Page Hello