The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20052143.tiff MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE A regular meeting of the Weld County Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee was held on Thursday, June 9, 2005 10:00 a.m., in the Conference Room of the Weld County Planning Department at 918 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Members Present: Joe Boshinski, ATMOS, Don Somer, Qwest, Robert Fleck, St. Vrain, Don Posselt Also Present: Sheri Lockman, Kim Ogle CASE NUMBER: MF-1056 APPLICANT: Francisco Granados PLANNER: Sheri Lockman LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-2916; being part of the W2NW4 of Section 3, T5N, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. REQUEST: A Minor Subdivision final Plan for four(4) residential Lots. (Pheasant Meadow) LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 60.5 and east of and adjacent to Hwy 37 Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services presented case MF-1056. The utilities will be provided by Atmos, Excel and Qwest. Sean Phipps, Pickett Engineering, representative for Clayton Harrison indicated he was available for questions. Don Carroll, Public Works asked if all utility agencies had been contacted. Mr. Phipps stated they have letters and everyone has been contacted. Ms. Lockman added the signature block will need to be added to the plats. There is no will serve letter from Atmos. There was additional discussion as to who the utility providers were for the site. Mr. Phipps indicated propane will be utilized in the area and the contact sheet he has is out of date and will need updated. Mr. Phipps added he is certain that the concerned utilities have been contacted. Don Carroll, Public Works, stated there should be a 15 foot easement not 10 foot on the north property line and east property line of Lot 1. Don Somer moved to approve with the understanding that the north and east property line will reflect a 15 foot easement. Don Posselt seconded. Motion carried. CASE NUMBER: MF-547 APPLICANT: Olando Ltd. Liability PLANNER: Sheri Lockman LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of RE-2016; being part of the SE4 of Section 16, T6N, R64W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. REQUEST: A Minor Subdivision Final Plan for nine (9) residential Lots. (Owl Creek Estates) LOCATION: North of and adjacent to State Highway 392; ' mile east of CR 53 Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services presented case MF-547. The utilities will be provided by Atmos, Qwest, and propane. Don Carroll asked about the different easements that are called out as a 25 foot Oil & Gas easement and a 20 foot utility and drainage easement that seem to be located on top of each other. This is located in Lot one. Mr. Posselt stated it looks like an exclusive oil &gas and then a 12 '/z foot utility/drainage separate to the west. Mr. Somer indicated there can be an easement on top of another easement; it depends on the room needed for the utilities. Mr. Somer stated an easement can be purchased from the land owner but that utility cannot go into another easement because it is exclusive. Discussion on the easements, including exclusive easements and the functions of them, where it would be noted on the plat and how it would be recorded. The discussion included several different Lots on this proposal and those Lots do not have adequate easements including the entrance. 2005-2143 • Sheri Lockman added there are future drill sites that will require additional easements. Don Posselt asked how the easements were to be recorded. Ms. Lockman stated it would be dedicated on the plat. Ms. Lockman added there was no information included in the title work for the 25 foot oil and gas easements. Ms. Lockman added that the 20 foot easement would be located on the top of another easement once this plat was recorded. Don Carroll stated that the 12 '/z feet is a dimension. Mr. Somer added that the easements are called out as easements. Mr. Carroll stated there are easements adjacent to Owl Creek Lane that can be utilized. Don Carroll asked if there were adjacent property owners to outLot A. Ms. Lockman stated they were different owners. Mr. Carroll asked for clarification on OutLot A rather it is open space. Ms. Lockman stated it will be open space with the mailboxes, bus pickup and sign. Mr. Carroll added that an option could be to go around OutLot A and box around it with easements. Robert Fleck stated there is only one entrance with no secondary access. Mr. Carroll stated the fire departments may ask for a secondary access but there is no location to access too. Mr. Carroll added that if it is paved it could be a problem for utilities, it is suggested that an additional 15 foot be asked for around L15 & L16 to gain access to Hwy 392. Mr. Somer stated he would like to see the east Lot line on Lot one that abuts Owl Creek Lane be a 20 foot easement since this is the only access. Don Carroll asked if a portion of OutLot A will be paved. Ms. Lockman stated they will be required to pave the pullout. This plat does not show what was approved for at change of zone. Don Carroll clarified the options as being either a 15 foot wide utility easement along the east side of Lot one or going around OutLot A since it will eventually be paved. Don Somer moved to have a 20 foot easement on the east side of Lot one and box around outLot A with the 20 foot. Mr. Somer also moved to have the back Lot lines of Lots 1-4 be a 30 foot easement due to the existing gas line. Joe Boshinski seconded. Motion passed. Kim Ogle asked about the utility and drainage next to Owl Creek since the area is prone to flooding. Mr. Carroll stated that the applicant needs to be aware of this. Mr. Posselt added that there is drainage from Howard Lake that could affect the back portion of these Lots. Mr. Carroll stated there are double easements in Lots 6-8 and this needs to be called out. Ms. Lockman stated that it will be clarified. CASE NUMBER: PF-555 APPLICANT: John Davis, Lyons 66 Pacific, LLC PLANNER: Kim Ogle LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt NW4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado REQUEST: Final Plat for a 15 Lot Commercial/Industrial PUD in the MUD LOCATION: East of and adjacent to 1-25 Frontage Road, and south of and adjacent to State Highway 66 Kim Ogle Department of Planning Services presented PF-555. Services will be provided by Little Thompson, St. Vrain, Public Service, United Power and Mountain View Fire District. Mr. Ogle added that there is a 30 foot easement area on Lot 12 which will accommodate the relocation of the CDOT drainage that comes from the highway along the frontage road to the back of the property to drop into the retention basin which is outLot A. Mr. Ogle added that the frontage road will eventually go away and become a cul de sac which ends on the Rademaker property. Robert Fleck asked if sanitary sewer was on the east side. Mr. Ogle stated that it was located along CR 9 '/z which is a trunk line main. Don Carroll asked if St. Vrain was close to Hwy 66 and the 1-25 Frontage Road. Mr. Fleck stated that they are close and there has been talk about moving the existing line south to get it out of the road. Mr. Davis indicated the sewer is west of the east property line along entire property. Mr. Fleck suggested the non exclusive exclusive easement of 20 foot be called out and what ever additional easements the utility companies will need. Mr. Carroll asked this easement was on the plat. Mr. Fleck stated it needs to be added. Mr. Davis stated it follows the Lot line. Discussion continued on location of existing St Vrain easement on the east side and any additional easements that may be needed for other utility companies. Mr. Carroll asked if the entire area would be served by St. Vrain. Mr. Davis indicated they would. Mr. Davis asked where the easement was located for St. Vrain. Mr. Fleck stated it was along the east side but he is not sure of the exact location. Mr. Davis stated the tie in is on the 1-25 frontage road. Don Carroll added that there needs to be additional easements paralleling St. Vrains existing easement for other utility services. Mr. Fleck stated they would prefer that no other easement be within 10 foot of theirs when they are running parallel. Mr. Ogle indicated that there is existing easements of 20-25 feet along the east boundary. It seems as though the intent was accomplished. Don Carroll stated the sewer line from St. Vrain needs to be called out if it is exclusive. Mr. Carroll asked for clarification on the lines called out in Lot one. Mr. Ogle stated there is a 15 foot utility easement and a 5 foot landscape easement for a total of 20 feet. Mr. Carroll stated that on Lot one there is a 15 foot utility easement but within the 15 feet there is a sewer line. Mr. Carroll stated there is a 20 foot easement from property line for the St. Vrain easement. Mr. Carroll stated that distance from property line to Lot 17 is 13 /,feet. Thus adequate easement area may already be in place. Mr. Ogle asked if there is no need for utilities along the east side of Lot 15 what the reasoning would be for additional easements. Mr. Carroll stated that the property to the east is not developed and it may be needed at that time. Mr. Carroll added there is no perimeter easements for outLot A. Mr. Ogle stated outLot a is a retention basin. Don Somer suggested making the change to Lot 15 and show the St. Vrain easement. Robert Fleck moved to change easement in Lot 15 to make it a 25 foot utility easement and show the existing St. Vrain easement. Don Somer seconded. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Voneen Macklin Secretary MAR-23-05 11:11 FROM-DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 3036662223 T-366 P.01/01 F-1'60 „1. L. r" 7w . . . -, _ . . BOARD OF DIRECTORS NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . GARY SIMPSON pal33247 HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE,CO 8O646 ROBERT ARNBRECHT °"-o CHARLES ACHZIGER . _ _ _ DON POSSELT,DISTRICT MANAGER ea- RALPH PRIOR -__ JOHN JOHNSON P.O.BOX 56 • PHONE(97O) 356-3O2O • FAX(970)395-O997 e-main water@nwcwd.org Office of the State Engineer Attn: Jeff Deatherage ' C;�`` ri Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Roam 818 MAY 1 0 2004 Denver,CO 80203 Re: Water Supply Report for North Weld County Water District ,:cam North Weld County Water District Water Rights Ownership Colorado Sig Thompson -.-— --... . a or t1n,ts 13704 I Avd.A-F I Share 0.7 J I Mini A-F i Snare 0.5 Omer Waters Norm Pouore Irrigation Company M of Snares 871 1 1 Avg.A-F r Snare 3.5 I 1 Firm A-F/Snare 2.5 Divide Canal it Reservoir Company a of Snares(47 I I Avg.A•F/Sharel1.O2 I 1 Firm A-F/Sharel0.65 Water Supply 8 Storage if of Shares17.5 I I Avg.A-F r Sharel84 I I Firm A-F r Snarel58 Demand Vs. Supply A$units in 1,000 gallons DEMAND Average Water Available Firm Yield(Drought)Water Available • District Current Delivery Requirements 935,654 CBI 865.400 COT 618.143 Aaoikonai Satiny ' Factor of 1.9 280.656 NPIC 7652C5 NPIC 546.616 Commined Additional Taps 1Approx.25O) 57,000 Divide Canal 15.621 Divide Canal 9,955 WS&S 205287 WSUS 135858 Total Demand 1,273.351 Average Supply 1,851,575 Drought Supply 1.311.575 Excise Supply 578,224 Excess Supply 38,224 Equivalent If of Additional Taps that water could provide: 2.536 168 L..cr..' .; , L a , • _ >'hiwJc.v '";(46. , - )1-", -- WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT (DEVELOPMENT/SUBDIVISION - SINGLE SYSTEM) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 2B° day of „in¢_ , 2004, by and between the North Weld County Water District, acting by and through the North Weld County Water District Enterprise (hereinafter "District") and Arm:cr'scQ aret.,nu[as (hereinafter "Developer"), of Pheasant Meadows Minor Subdivision, (hereinafter "Development"). RECITALS WHEREAS, District is a statutory special district formed under the laws of the State of Colorado and is a quasi municipal corporation; and WHEREAS, the District Enterprise was created by the District, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 20, Article X of the Colorado Constitution and Article 45.1 of Title 37 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the District owns, maintains and operates a system for the storage of and distribution of potable water within Weld County and Larimer County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to contract with the District for certain potable water supplies and services for the Development known as Pheasant Meadows Minor Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Developer intends to plat and/or develop more than three residential lots which will require dedication of raw water and/or payment of cash in lieu of raw water dedication in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, it is agreed by and between the District and Developer as follows: ARTICLE 1 WATER SUPPLY/FACILITIES 1.1 The District shall furnish a customary supply of water for a total of four (4) individual residential water taps ("Taps"). The District shall furnish 70% of an acre foot (228,000 gallons) of water per tap per annual water year, if the allotment for Colorado- Big Thompson (CBT) project water, which is determined by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, is 50% or greater. North Weld County Water District will restrict the delivery as necessary when the CBT allotment is less than 50%. 1.2 The water to be furnished by the District shall be potable water, which complies with the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and any other applicable drinking water regulations. No promise or guarantee of pressure is made by the District or is to be implied from anything contained herein. 1.3 The District shall use reasonable diligence to provide a constant and uninterrupted supply of water, except for interruptions due to: (1) Uncontrollable forces; (2) Operations or devices installed for water system protection; (3) Maintenance, repair, replacement, installation of equipment, or investigation and inspection of the water system, which interruption or reductions are temporary, and in the sole opinion of the District, necessary. 1.4 The District shall install and own a meter vault at each individual lot. PASubdivisions\PLeasantMeadows\W alerServiceAgreemeut(02-I I-04).doc ARTICLE 2 RESIDENTIAL TAP COSTS AND EXPENSES 2.1 The Developer shall pay the full portion of the construction for water lines within the Development (or that exclusively serve the Development) that will serve the individual taps. The District must ap""prove engineering and construction plans of all water lines before construction. Once the District has approved the final water line construction and installation, in accordance with all District policies and engineering requirements, the District will conditionally accept the water lines by issuance of a conditional acceptance letter (see Exhibit "A"). Two years after conditional acceptance of the water lines, subject to final approval by the District, Developer shall dedicate ownership of the water lines to the District. The Developer may use the District's existing water lines to serve the individual taps, if the District determines in its sole discretion, that the water line may be accessed and has available capacity and pressure to serve the Development. 2.2 No residential water service will be provided to any water tap within the Development until all fees, expenses and charges as determined by the District have been paid and/or water dedicated. The fees, charges and expenses, and/or water dedication shall be as determined and defined by the District and based upon such fees, charges and expenses, and water dedication requirements then in effect. Developer understands that the amount due for such fees, charges and expenses, and/or water dedication are subject to change or modification at the sole discretion of District. 2.3 Pursuant to this Agreement, the fees, expenses and charges for a water tap consist of (1) Infrastructure Enhancement Fee as determined in Paragraph 2.4; (2) raw water or cash in lieu as provided in Paragraph 2.7; (3) Plant Investment Fee as provided in Paragraph 2.5; (4) Mileage Charge pursuant to Paragraph 2.6; and (5) Meter Fee as provided pursuant to Paragraph 2.10. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, payment of all fees, expenses and charges as established pursuant to this Agreement shall be a condition precedent to the District being required to provide water service to any tap within the Development. If the total fees, expenses and charges are not paid, all prior fees, expenses and charges paid by the Developer or any improvements made by the Developer shall be considered as forfeited to the District as liquidated damages as accurate calculation and determination of damages would not be possible. 2.4 The District may be constructing substantial offsite infrastructure enhancements. A portion of these enhancements will be attributable to the Development and an Infrastructure Enhancement Fee will be charged to the Developer. The Infrastructure Enhancement Fee shall be solely determined by the District, and for this development said fee shall be the sum of$4,00000. A portion of this payment determined to be $200.00 of said Fee shall be paid by the Developer and payment shall be made upon execution of this agreement and the remainder ($3,800.00) of said Fee be made prior to commencement of construction of water lines that will serve the Development, or the issuance of any residential building permit, whichever occurs earliest. The Infrastructure Enhancement Fee, as established in this paragraph 2.4, is non-refundable. 2.5 The Plant Investment Fee for one (1) tap shall be initially paid to the District in a single lump sum on or before the 1s) day of March, 2005. If the Plant Investment Fee for the initial one (1) tap has not been paid by this last mentioned date, this Water Service Agreement shall be deemed null and void and the District shall be entitled to keep, as liquidated damages, any sums or fees previously paid by Developer. The Developer will be responsible for making payments of the Plant Investment Fee in groups of one (1). Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any residential building permit or the installation of the water service, whichever occurs earliest. All Plant Investment Fees paid, shall be in accordance with the Plant Investment Fee as PASubdwisioaskfla;asaatMeadows\W alerServiceAgreeuuN(02-I 1-04).doc established by the District and in effect at the time of the lump sum payment. No portion of the Plant Investment Fee shall be returned or refunded once established pursuant to this Agreement and the Development is approved by Weld County, even if the number of lots and/or taps in the Development is later decreased or unsold. However, if the number of lots and/or taps increases beyond the number established in this Paragraph 2.5, Developer will pay the Plant Investment Fee for each new tap within the Development at the rate for Plant Investment Fees then in effect. 2.6 Also, the Developer shall initially make payment for the Mileage Charge for one (1) tap to the District in a single lump sum on or before the 1st day of March, 2005. If the Mileage Charge for the initial one (1) tap has not been paid by this last mentioned date, this Water Service Agreement shall be deemed null and void and the District shall be entitled to keep, as liquidated damages, any sums or fees previously paid by Developer. The Developer will be responsible for making payments of the Mileage Charge in groups of one (1). Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any residential building permit or the installation of the water service, whichever occurs earliest. All Mileage Charges paid, shall be in accordance with the Mileage Charge as established by the District and in effect at the time of the lump sum payment. No portion of the Mileage Charge shall be returned or refunded once established pursuant to this Agreement and the Development is approved by Weld County, even if the number of lots and/or taps in the Development is later decreased or unsold. However, if the number of lots and/or taps increases beyond the number established in this Paragraph 2.6, Developer will pay the Mileage Charge for each new tap within the Development at the rate for Mileage Charge then in effect. 2.7 The raw water requirement shall be met by payment of cash in lieu of the dedication of raw water. The initial cash in lieu fee shall be a single lump sum payment for one (1) tap and is to be paid on or before the 1st day of March, 2005. If the Cash in Lieu Fee for the initial one (1) taps has not been paid by this last mentioned date, this Water Service Agreement shall be deemed null and void and the District shall be entitled to keep, as liquidated damages, any sums or fees previously paid by Developer. The Developer will be responsible for making payments of the cash in lieu fee in groups of one (1). Said payment shall be made prior to the issuance of any residential building permit or the installation of the water service, whichever occurs earliest. All Cash in Lieu Fees paid, shall be in accordance with the Cash in Lieu Fee as established by the District and in effect at the time of the lump sum payment. If the number of lots and/or taps increases beyond the number established in this Paragraph 2.7, Developer will pay the Cash in Lieu Fee for each new tap within the Development at the rate for Cash in Lieu Fee then in effect. 2.8 The Developer shall provide the District with security to secure the installation and warranty of water lines within the Development during the two-year conditional acceptance period. Said security shall cover 25% of all costs for construction of said water lines, which shall be released at the expiration of the one- year warranty period and upon full acceptance of the water lines by the District. The type of security to be accepted shall be at the sole discretion of the District, which will normally be a letter of credit, certificate of deposit, or bond. 2.9 During the two-year conditional acceptance period the Developer will be responsible for any repairs or maintenance of the Development water line improvements. All such repairs and/or maintenance shall be in accordance with the District policies and engineering requirements, and shall be reviewed and approved by the District prior to any repairs or maintenance being effected except in emergency situations. 2.10 Prior to a meter being set and water service being provided at or for any tap, the Developer or parcel owner shall be required to complete the District's tap application form, pay the Meter Fee, and pay any remaining fees, expenses and charges, if any, in accordance with the policies and procedures of the District at the time P:\Subdivisions\PLeasanNeadows\W aferServiccAgreemenl(02-I 1-04).doc of any tap application, or any other expenses or costs that may be incurred by the District in relation to the Development. ARTICLE 3 FIRE PROTECTION 3.1 Fire protection is a basic provision generally required for development activities in the County for which this Development is to be constructed. The Development may be located within an established fire protection district ("FPD") which has its own policies, procedures and requirements concerning fire protection which may be in addition to or supplement any requirements imposed by the County. Developer understands that District is not responsible for compliance with any such FPD or County requirements and such requirements are the sole responsibility of Developer, FPD and/or County. Developer further understands that District is not required to provide fire flows or even allow fire protection devices, including but not limited to hydrants, water lines, sprinklers, and valves, to be installed, inspected, serviced or provided by District. 3.2 However, as a courtesy and public service, District will permit Developer to install certain fire protection infrastructure pursuant to the provisions of this Article 3 and any other provisions or requirement deemed necessary by District, in its sole discretion. 3.3 Developer shall provide to the District, FPD and County plans and specifications for fire protection infrastructure, including but not limited to location and size of water lines to serve fire hydrants ("Fire Facilities"). Said plans shall be in accordance with any specifications and requirements established by District, County and/or FPD. Based upon the plans, the District has-determined that-Developer-shall-be rate and-dedicated-Fire Facilities which are water lines-and hydrants separate and-apart from the water service lines-that-provide-potable-water--to the residential-taps within the Development. If Developer is unable to provide adequate or completed plans at this time, the District, in its sole discretion, may subsequently require the Developer to install such separate and dedicated Fire Facilities prior to final approval and submission and/or recording of any final development plan. 3.4 Upon final approval of the plans and designs by District, County and FPD, Developer shall be responsible for installation of the same including all costs incurred by District to review plans, installation, and inspection of the same by District. Upon approval of the installation of all such fire facilities by District, County and FPD, District will thereafter assume the responsibility for effecting maintenance and repairs of such facilities but District will be compensated for such maintenance and repairs, in perpetuity, by Developer or Homeowners Association in the Pheasant Meadows Minor Subdivision Development. Additionally, responsibility for all costs of maintenance and repairs shall become a part of Covenants that run with the title to all lots and property within the Pheasant Meadows Minor Subdivision Development, and which shall constitute a first and prior lien upon all lots and property in said Pheasant Meadows Minor Subdivision Development. 3.5 As a consideration forthis Agreement, Developer releases District from any and all liability or claims that may be made against the District concerning lack of water, pressure, maintenance, etc. 3.6 Any final approval of this Development must make reference to the responsibility of the property and owners concerning expenses of maintenance and repairs for the fire facilities pursuant to Paragraph 3.4 P:\Subdivisions\PLeasant Meadows\WaterServiceAgreemeng02-1I-04).doc ARTICLE 4 EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 4.1 As additional consideration for this Water Service Agreement, Developer agrees to sign and execute the attached form Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement (Exhibit "B") with the specific locations, widths, size of pipeline(s) and descriptions to be determined all of which shall be satisfactory to the District, at its sole discretion. This Agreement is conditional upon execution and recording of the Easement and Right-of- Way Agreement, and until such Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement is finalized to the satisfaction of the District and recorded, District shall not be required to provide any services of any type. • 4.2 In addition to execution of the attached Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement, any plats submitted for approval to any governmental authority shall provide and indicate the location of the easements and rights-of-way as provided in this Agreement. Said plans and plats must be approved by the District prior to any final approval by any governmental authority. ARTICLE 5 MISCELLANEOUS 5.1 This Agreement is conditional as the final plat of the Development has not yet been approved by Weld County. If the final plat is not approved on or before the 1st day of September, 2005, this Agreement can then be terminated by Developer and the same shall be considered null and void. Notwithstanding any language to the contrary, Developer shall be entitled to a refund of 98% of costs and expenses paid pursuant to Article 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7. The 2% retention by the District shall be considered as administrative expenses. Any costs or expenses the Developer occurred pursuant to Articles 2.1 and 2.4 shall not be entitled to a refund of any amount. 5.2 This Agreement cannot be assigned by Developer without the express written approval of District. 5.3 This Agreement shall inure to and be binding upon the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns. PaSubdivisionsTheasantMeadowsMalerServiceAgreemenl(02-11-O)aloe IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER: �-anr(At <.- By: DISTRICT: ATTEST: - NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By:a •- ry Secr President 4/ a STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF 1 ` ( i ) ss. ,J The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 day of �.„r)..-3 . , a,e c4k, by `-.-a,o.v\c',sc.r� Cr(3..., C Dev;.• :EEN 4p!\` " ' • G s1/ d and official seal.•lit 9.. Pinissit expires: ot-) e,°\ - LO y IIIS.'. OiL COLOF‘P�r n....� Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF WELD ) ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged^n before me this a.`b day of 3` .J..-..,__, , a- O •,t‘ , by ChuJ \•5, ;\c1/4,"i- ,icr as President and .30,h., v Sra4.,,,: e.;\ as Secretary of North Weld County Water District. Witness my hand and official seal. My commi, ys, sires: F• - ',,`i --o t,- 'tj.EN M4C 11") i : NOTARYym�, Qafn.,N, f`NC,--LLL.:_ j ' '•-•-. '" Notary Public iitl. oU%BLIC l �P tk'\`co``4, P;\SubdivisionsTheasanlMeadows\W aterServiceAgreemen((02-11-04).doc -- ..-a..- 0..-1. 3 . Saar - - . .a-a..:+Sla'if;J:::;t3;,'�m'A &s a;.,,' "ery�-ig-T.+. ,x`.f_ !set. ,*$ i L T\1UC%WC tAt'tOMj.1W"t ,S`t 2507 FRANCISCO GRANADOS 3434 CODY AVENUE q 82-639/1070 EVANS, CO 50620/. 0/ \ DATE 6 - Z > 8272571021 ifAIORDER OFE Ai W ` CQ V e O� I $ 2©a� / / or', o I Jw0 E * Fe <•/ C DOLLARS Bi tiBA FIRST LINE OF CREDIT GPEEIE OPEB 337117 24 HOOF,BANKING(600)964-3444 MEMO c' )( M, 1: L0700639 21:827`25 ? LO21(I• 2 4553 NOTES RECEIPT DATE//� :Q&/7R�Ol Na 455-) b RECEIVED FROM Il�� ra,n6 sfit) raan(415 �J W ADDRESS ThOaSnnk k nAG2n:� Imo`:^or ScsiocUJ.S:a-` in ton 1Aa)iV�Y.� c SLV5 G iota $ '.�-OO no i .r x O V („) FOR Off a13cc. -C.r[zs_ski-AA4- ( l'�Attiac ..,4_,,A,-,5 O C ACCOUNT HOW PAID ht—QVS\t` I)¢T \I.1rSIN-- "O IJ-• W AMT.OF CASH 11 5 ACCOUNT ) AMT. I, PAID p-OC3 00 CHECK 2507 CI BALANCE MONEY BY (�Mj`S Z DUE ORDER ©2001 REDIFORM®BLB70 \\�J/ 0 . L-Lo 1 ...--c-,:. ) ) ) I PHEASANT MEADOW MINOR SUBDIVISION DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Weld County, Colorado Septic systems will be designed in accordance with Chapter 30 of the Weld County Code. For a four-bedroom, single-family, 2,000 sf home (such as those proposed for Pheasant Meadow), Appendix 30-C of the Weld County Code requires an absorption area between 271-325 sf per bedroom. This equates to septic field sizes ranging from 1,084 sf to 1,300 sf. Given the large lot sizes of those proposed for this subdivision, adequate space is available for this size leach field. Additionally, according to Appendix 30-A of the Weld County Code, a single-family dwelling will produce 75 gallons/person/day. Finally, RE050066, issued by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners, states in Section 2C in the "Reasons for Approval" that "The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has reviewed this proposal and has indicated the applicant has satisfied Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. Sewer will be provided by Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (I.S.D.S.) and the overall density meets the current Department policy. Each lot for the proposed Minor Subdivision shall have an I.S.D.S. installed per the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment requirements and specifications." Pickett Engineering, Inc. Page 1 of 1 April 26,2005 PEI No.03-033 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 601/2 Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil and Bedrock Conditions Soils at the site generally consisted of silty sand and sandy lean clay to depths of approximately 8 feet. Summary boring logs are attached with this report. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was encountered at approximate depths of 4 to 6'14 feet in the test borings at the time of field exploration and when checked on August 4, 2003. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Field Test Results « Field test results indicate that the clay soils vary from soft to medium in consistency. The sand soils vary from very loose to loose in relative density. Preliminary percolation testing conducted in the area of the proposed soil absorption bed is summarized as follows: y r Percolation Test Results Test Hole Depth Soil Percolation Rate (inches) Classification (minutes/inch) 1 36 SM 17 2 36 SC-SM 20 3 36 SM 30 The soils in the area of the proposed leach field have fair percolation rates. Septic System Construction Preliminary percolation rates of 17 to 30 minutes per inch were obtained for the site. These values are acceptable for standard leach field construction as outlined by Weld County regulations. The groundwater at the site varied from 4 feet on the southem part of the site to 6% feet near the northern end of the property. Standard septic systems appear to be feasible on the northern portion of the site. Due to the relatively shallow groundwater, engineered septic systems may be 3 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 601/2 Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 necessary on the central and southern portions of the property. Prior to the start of construction complete soil percolation tests must be performed for each residence once lot and building locations are sited. GENERAL COMMENTS The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from borings performed to obtain representative subsurface conditions at the site. Variations in the soil between borings will occur. Northern Colorado Geotech should be present during construction to observe the excavation and construction procedures and confirm or modify our recommendations. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental assessment of the site. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices,in this area at this time. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. • 4 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 60'/i Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil and Bedrock Conditions Soils at the site generally consisted of silty sand and sandy lean clay to depths of approximately 8 feet. Summary boring logs are attached with this report. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was encountered at approximate depths of 4 to 6'14 feet in the test borings at the time of field exploration and when checked on August 4, 2003. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Field Test Results. Field test results indicate that the clay soils vary from soft to medium in consistency. The sand soils vary from very loose to loose in relative density. Preliminary percolation testing conducted in the area of the proposed soil absorption bed is summarized as follows: Percolation Test Results Test Hole Depth Soil Percolation Rate (inches) Classification (minutes/inch) 1 36 SM 17 2 36 SC-SM 20 3 36 SM 30 The soils in the area of the proposed leach field have fair percolation rates. Septic System Construction Preliminary percolation rates of 17 to 30 minutes per inch were obtained for the site. These values are acceptable for standard leach field construction as outlined by Weld County regulations. The groundwater at the site varied from 4 feet on the southem part of the site to 6% feet near the northern end of the property. Standard septic systems appear to be feasible on the northem portion of the site. Due to the relatively shallow groundwater, engineered septic systems may be 3 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 6014 Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 necessary on the central and southern portions of the property. Prior to the start of construction complete soil percolation tests must be performed for each residence once lot and building locations are sited. GENERAL COMMENTS The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from borings performed to obtain representative subsurface conditions at the site. Variations in the soil between borings will occur. Northern Colorado Geotech should be present during construction to observe the excavation and construction procedures and confirm or modify our recommendations. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental assessment of the site. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering " practices in this area at this time. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made 1 ? 1 4 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 60% Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil and Bedrock Conditions Soils at the site generally consisted of silty sand and sandy lean clay to depths of approximately 8 feet. Summary boring logs are attached with this report. Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was encountered at approximate depths of 4 to 6%feet in the test borings at the time of field exploration and when checked on August 4, 2003. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. 4 Field Test Results a Field test results indicate that the clay soils vary from soft to medium in consistency. The sand soils vary from very loose to loose in relative density. Preliminary percolation testing conducted in the area of the proposed soil absorption bed is summarized a;follows: Percolation Test Results Test Hole Depth Soil Percolation Rate (inches) Classification (minutes/inch) 1 36 SM 17 2 36 SC-SM 20 3 36 SM 30 • The soils in the area of the proposed leach field have fair percolation rates. Septic System Construction Preliminary percolation rates of 17 to 30 minutes per inch were obtained for the site. These values are acceptable for standard leach field construction as outlined by Weld County regulations. The groundwater at the site varied from 4 feet on the southern part of the site to 6% feet near the northern end of the property. Standard septic systems appear to be feasible on the northern portion of the site. Due to the relatively shallow groundwater, engineered septic systems may be 3 Pickett Engineering Preliminary Soil Percolation Test Highway 37 and Weld County Road 60'/: Northern Colorado Geotech Project No. 132-03 necessary on the central and southern portions of the property. Prior to the start of construction complete soil percolation tests must be performed for each residence once lot and building locations are sited. GENERAL COMMENTS The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from borings performed to obtain representative subsurface conditions at the site. Variations in the soil between borings will occur. Northern Colorado Geotech should be present during construction to observe the excavation and construction procedures and confirm or modify our recommendations. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental assessment of the site. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this area at this time. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. 4 APPENDIX 30-A AVERAGE FLOW GUIDE TABLE Lbs5days Gallons/person/day BOD/person/day Type of Establishment *Gallons/unit/day *BOD/unidday Residential Hotels&motels without private baths 50 .15 Hotels&motels with private baths 60 .15 Multiple-family dwellings or apartments 75 .20 Rooming houses 50 .15 Single-family dwellings - 75 .20 Commercial Airline catering per meal served 3 .03 Airports(per passenger),not incl. food 5 02 Airports(per employee) 10 .06 Bus service areas,not incl. food 5 .02 Country clubs,not incl. food 30 .02 Day workers at offices 15 .06 Drive-in theaters,not incl. food(per space per day) 10 .06 Factories and plants(exclusive of industrial wastes) 35 .08 Laundries,self-service(gal./washer) 400 2.00 Movie theaters,not incl. food(per audience seat) — 5 .03 Restaurants(toilet,kitchen wastes/patron) 10 .06 (additional for bars,cocktail lounges) 2 .02 Restaurants(kitchen waste/meal served) 3 .03 Restaurants(with paper service/meal served) 1.5 .01 Stores(per public toilet) $ 400 2.00 _ Work/construction camps(semi-permanent)(with flush toilets) 50 .17 Work/construction camps(semi-permanent)(without flush toilets) 35 .02 Travel trailer parks/individual water&sewage hookup *100 *.50 Travel trailer parks/without individual water/sewage hookups *50 *.17 Institutional Hospitals(per bed space) 250 .20 Institutions other than hospitals(per bed space) 125 .17 Mobile home parks, independent 75 .20 Schools,boarding 100 — .17 Schools,day(without cafeterias,gym&shower) 15 .04 Schools,day(with cafeterias but not gym or shower) 20 .08 Schools,day(with cafeterias,guy and shower) 25 .10 Appx 30-1 APPENDIX 30-C SUBSURFACE ABSORPTION AREA FOR DWELLING USE Percolation Rate Min/Inch Trench Absorption Area Bed Absorption Area per bedroom in Sq. Ft. per bedroom in Sq. Ft. 5.0 125 165 7.5 145 190 10.0 165 215 12.5 183 237 15.0 200 260 17.5 209 271 20.0 217 282 22.5 225 293 25.0 234 303 27.5 243 313 30.0 250 325 32.5 258 340 35.0 267 348 37.5 275 357 40.0 284 368 42.5 293 377 45.0 300 388 47.5 I 308 397 ►- 50.0 316 410 52.5 325 422 55.0 333 435 57.5 342 447 60.0 350 i 460 Appx 30-4 MAR 05 2004 15 : 46 FR XCEL ENERGY 970 395 1224 TO 93566486 P . 01 /01 D3-o3 ` au Xcel Energy I o PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY 15006th AvenueGreeley,Colorado 80631 05MAR03 • Pickett Engineering,Inc. 808 8t°St. Greeley, CO 80631 Atten; Chico Quintana RE: Pheasant Meadow subdivision Dear Mr. Quintana; Xcel Energy is the electrical provider for the area in which Pheasant Meadow is located and will serve the requested lots as detailed in the rates and tariffs on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Sincerely, Larry E. Homan Planner Electric Distribution Design Dept. Greeley Operations 970-395-1238 ** TOTAL PAGE .0I ** • O3-o33/ ;970 35O 2883 C I/ D3-o3r 12680 Weld County Road 58 Greeley.CO 80634 l0' �'. /71 Qwesc C 12860 WCR 58 Greeley, CO 80634 06/21/04 Chico Quintana 970-356-6362 970-356-6486 Fax Pickett Engineering 808 8th St Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Will Serve for Pheasant Meadow Subdivision Thank you very much for your request for telecommunications services from Qwest Communications. Qwest will provide service to your planned site within the City of Greeley, located at 29764 Hwy 37, in Sec 3 Township 5N Range 64W, in the 61° Meridian. As you may know, many of the telecommunications services provided by Qwest are regulated and the service you requested will be provided under rates and tariffs on file at the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Qwest appreciates your business and looks forward to working with you to meet your needs. If there are any further questions, or if I can provide any assistance, please feel free to contact me on 970-350-2941 Sincrely,i(61 Mel Huston Field Engineer Network Services cc file USA span,., Hello