The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20040510.tiff r- 7.7....e....,r--.-..........--...........----. e'''" USE SPECIAL REVIEW W12 SW/4,SECTION 26,T3N,R65W WELD COUNTY,COLORADO SOIL TYPE(SCS,19130) 69 VAUNT SAND,0.3 PERCENT SLOPES, 69 DEEP AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED, �yd BROWN SAND 70 f VALENT SAND,3-0 PERCENT SLOPES, 70 DEEP AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED, v.../ BROWN SAND REFERENCE:CRABS,JAMES A,1980 . SOIL SURVEY OF WELD COUNTY,COLO. SOUTHERN PART;USDA SOS I-" IIIW W am..�..•.... . moo....... /117 (21 WIN MOMISONO JOIN rodeo Y•.I.YYYtlmo1.0 I• li T lIM ITIem I NW I ILL IN:TIONIS N IV .momzr I • •O meets NNt �,rde,Iy -.rr ^'T rtt '.nr . .` SWIM OMNdeTr ��moyM..0 mom10IIIR GAS M ER RUN • ,. WW1 MOWN ISOMNM IMMII MIN INCHRIN le SKIM as +'www ---nom NooMo lo.. MOIIIM •w' MIMI!KIK MMw MWOmWIT.00laMIA •w.N' — *VS.Mq4 Pk TIN,I•• -.-, 89 •pp`• T' • • 70 nom,i.NIO.r.NrMM .•-.. —....• sr..rs...M...e_. t \\A M..W rM.....MW..m.owMMi.. '��-.°•�'�_�•••'-�~•• D ., PROPOSE1111.1. _. COMPOST FARM .u....,....«.• A .•- owwr..-r ..lIM I,.r.Iar.wM�. •.rmow.. I... % SW CDR. 1,000 FEET I ,I, 2,0iim=hiffy=fr STROMO,LLC. SEC.26 PLAT 4CAt F. 8800 WEST 20TH STREET II t • PARCEL PROPOSED FOR CONTOUR INTERVAL 2' GREELEY,COLORADO SOW USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW OM 330.3473 WQ SW/4,SECTION 28.T3N.R6SW 2004-0510 n r"‘ • NOTE: THIS IS A W/2 SW 4YSECTI0N 2s T3N Taw , PAGE 1 OF 2 FACSIMILE OF THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 24"x36" PLAT WHICH 20 SOIL TYPE (SCS, 1980) IS BEING DRAFTED FOR 69 VALENT SAND,0-3 PERCENT FORMAL SUBMITTAL AT SLOPES,DEEP AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED, A LATER DATE. BROWN SAND 70 VALENT SAND,3-9 PERCENT SLOPES,DEEP AND EXCESSIVELY DRAINED BROWN SAND 70 2 REFERENCE:CRABS,JAMES A,1 800 SOIL SURVEY OF WELD COUNTY,COLO. 6 SOUTHERN PART;USDA SCS 4 0 4830 F VICINITY MAP• 36 INCHES E SEE SECOND PAGE FOR 1 . � DETAILS TER U T 69 GAS NE PROPOSED COMPOST FARM PARCEL PROPOSED FOR I i THE USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW '••-----.-.: ._....-._................ JOHN MOSER W/4,SW/4,SEC.13 • 1, FEET 6600 WEST 20TH STREET#11 •• •• ••Y•••••^ ••••• GREELEY,COLORADO 9 634 PLAT SCALE:1'=100' $W Cof'�, 4•^• • . (970)330-3474 CONTOUR INTERVAL:2' - r GRAP-IC SCALE N FEET 24 INCHES JOHN MOSER USR APPLICATION STORM WATER CONTAINMENT SYSTEM PLAT W/2 SW/4, SECTION 26, T3N, R65W, 6TH P.M. WELD COUNTY COLORADO (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD NORTH SOIL BERM WALL DESIGN STORM WATER RETENTION SIDE VIEW AREA S00'X13OO' NORTH BERM WALL 45 DEGREES 6 FEET -C>- GL \\j%/ /\\ 1.5FE �L SURFACE OW TOP VIEW G TENT CI 8 FEET -- WEST <CF--- BERM WALL GRASAND SS CROWN SIDE WALLS W/2 SW/4 \ !� SECTION 26 • • SW SEC. COR. r n r WCR 30 R 65 W ( IRULTURELAND\ 7JRRJ :;:L:ED PAC 2OF NW/4 _ NE/4 SECTION 26 SECTION 27 il NORTH \ SyE: i SONSTOAD OCOEE=WSJ. / FL347 0= I WEST i + NERES IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE LAND i . CANAL JOHN i' T3N t91-., SE/4 MOSER SW/4 SECTION 27 SECTION 26 i i' JOHN MOSER WES MOSER& SONS [ I DRYLAND PASTURE SWAM ACCESS ROAD OL TAWS i O . !GATED AGRICULTURE a4, 1 1 SECTION CDR. `, STOCK i WES MOSER& CHARLES FOSTER SONS ; , NE/4 NW/4 ; DRYLAND SECTION 34 SECTION 3d PASTURE PARCEL PROPOSED FOR PLAT SCALE:T •=T,DOO' VICINITY MAP USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW N/2 SWl4 SECTION 2e,TYN,Re5W WELD COUNTY, COLORADO f1 .+ 72 V 44 ' 69 44 72 , 69 70 72 69 72 111 44 72 i \ 73 5-6 _E 21 �F - - 69 23 _ 49 69 iiiiib X70 • 72 7069 m , (g ; . t4'_ ,, r 72 S K a v. 114, 4 h <' I. 72° 9 70 69 ': '.Sw F' �. 49 X32 �. , } 70 .. I - xr:.. " ...ww.. 70 + ,. x �'1, yt • rte.°44 49 '� 8 °' y,' fi 6r q rb x rg 49 si4P* a.. J ^r.' s "' '4w;. �h4 35 -' t..,:xe, ‘k ,� >� Ah 14 ''''74;,;'. r, 6 c :A ° lY� ¢¢ � „ ttk 44 = ` 69 72 Iz 6 ' /1 � .r.. v770 fig 49 G 1]'�`y, — j �I a4.44.1-1, 41 fp { 4B �ty4+ :- e .z i 44 SOIL SURVEY to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is low. ^ too low to make beneficial use of fertilizer. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. The potential native vegetation is dominated by little Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. bluestem, sideoats grams, sand reedgrass, blue grama, The potential native vegetation is dominated by hairy grama, awitehgrass, and needleandthread. Potential western wheatgrass and blue grama. Buffalograss is also production ranges from 700 pounds per acre in favorable "' present. Potential production ranges from 1,000 pounds years to 200 pounds in unfavorable years. As range condi- per acre in favorable years to 600 pounds in unfavorable tion deteriorates, the tall and mid grasses decrease, blue ' years. As range condition deteriorates, a blue grama-buf- grams and hairy grama increase, and forage production , falograss sod forms. Undesirable weeds and annuals in- drops. vade the site as range condition becomes poorer. Management of vegetation should be based on taking Management of vegetation on this soil should be based half or less of the total annual production. Deferred graz- on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- ing is practical in improving range condition. Seeding and tion. Range pitting can reduce runoff. Seeding is desirable mechanical treatment are impractical. if the range is in poor condition. Western wheatgrass, Windbreaks and environmental plantings generally are 1 blue grama, sideoats grams, buffalograss, pubescent not suited to these soils. Onsite investigation is needed to determine if plantings are feasible. wheatgrass, and crested wheatgrass are suitable for seed- Wildlife populations are limited because the necessary 4 ing. The grass selected should meet the seasonal require- s ments of livestock. It can be seeded into a clean, firm habitat elements are lacking. Because most of the acreage is sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into a firm prepared rangeland, only rangeland wildlife, for example scaled seedbed. 4uail and antelope, are typical. Extreme care is needed in Seeding early in spring has proven most success- fill. managing livestock grazing in order to provide suitable Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and s1 habitat on these soils. Potential is poor for urban and recreational develop shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well ment. The chief limiting soil features are the loose, coarse suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing textured soil, steep slopes, and rapid permeability. Caps- vegetation should be continued for as many years as bility subclass Vila irrigated, VIIs nonirrigated; Gravel ;iJ possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and Breaks range site. rl 'eaN have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern 69—Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, t," redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and excessively drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,650 to €? hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, 5,100 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included m lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. mapping are small areas of soils that have lime within a Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The depth of 40 inches. cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked Typically the surface layer is brown sand about 8 pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60 `' be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape inches is brown sand. cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be low. attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, This soil is suited to limited cropping. Intensive managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. cropping is hazardous because of erosion. The cropping This soil has poor potential for urban and recreational system should be limited to such close grown crops as al- development. Slow permeability and high shrink swell falfa, wheat, and barley. The soil also is suited to ir- cause problems in dwelling and road construction. Caps- rigated pasture. A suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 bility subclass IIIe irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Clayey years of alfalfa followed by 2 years of corn and small Plains range site. grain and alfalfa seeded with a nurse crop. 68—Ustic Torriorthents, moderately steep. These are Closely spaced contour ditches or sprinkers can be used deep, excessively drained soils on terrace breaks and in irrigating close grown crops. Contour furrows or sprin- escarpments at elevations of 4,450 to 5,100 feet. They klers should be used for new crops. Applications of bar- formed in gravelly alluvium and have slopes of 9 to 25 nyard manure and commercial fertilizer help to maintain percent. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that good production. have pockets of sandy loam and loam in the underlying The potential vegetation is dominated by sand material. bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, n Typically the surface layer is pale brown gravelly sand needleandthread, little bluestem, and blue grama. Poten- about 10 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth tial production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre in of 60 inches is pale brown gravelly sand. favorable years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As n WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 45 range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, The potential vegetation is dominated by sand rgitchgrass, sand reedgrass, sideoats grams, and little bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass, sideoats grama, estem decrease, forage production drops, and sand needleandthread, little bluestem, and blue grama. Poten- sage increases. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade tial production ranges from 2,500 pounds per acre in and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition favorable years to 1,800 pounds in unfavorable years. As becomes poorer. range condition deteriorates, the sand bluestem, Management of vegetation on this soil should be based switchgrass, sand reedgrass, sideoats grams, and little on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- bluestem decrease, forage production drops, and sand tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. sage increases. Undesirable weeds and annuals invade Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, indiangrass, switchgrass, and "blowout" conditions can occur as range condition sideoats grama, little bluestem, and blue grama are suits- becomes poorer. ble for seeding. Because this soil is susceptible to soil Management of vegetation on this soil should be based blowing, it should be seeded using an interseeder, or the on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produc- seed should be drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Brush Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, indiangrass, switchgrass, management also can help in improving deteriorated side-oats grams, little bluestem, and blue grama are suita- range. ble for seeding. Because this soil is susceptible to soil Windbreaks and environmental plantings are fairly well blowing, it should be seeded using an interseeder or the suited to this soil. Blowing sand and the moderate avails- seed should be drilled into a firm, clean sorghum stubble. ble water capacity are the principal hazards in establish- Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. Brush ing trees and shrubs. The soil is so loose that trees should management can also help in improving deteriorated be planted in shallow furrows, maintaining vegetation range. between the rows. Supplemental irrigation is needed to Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally insure survival. Trees that are best suited and have good not suited to this soil. Onsite investigation is needed to survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, determine if plantings are feasible. ponderosa pine, and Siberian elm. The shrubs best suited Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. Ran- are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberian peashrub. geland wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The be attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. rTheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can This soil has fair potential for urban development. The e attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escape chief limiting soil features are the rapid permeability and cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- the susceptibility to soil blowing. Septic tank absorption tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- fields function properly, but in places the sandy sub- ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- stratum does not properly filter the leachate. Sewage land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be lagoons must be sealed. Once established, lawns, shrubs, attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, and trees grow well. Capability subclass VIe irrigated, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. VIe nonirrigated; Deep Sand range site. This soil has fair potential for urban development. The 71—Valent-Loup complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes. This primary limiting soil features are the rapid permeability level to moderately sloping map unit occupies hills, ridges, and the susceptibility to soil blowing. Septic tank absorp- and depression or pothole-like areas in the sandhills at tion fields function properly, but in places the sandy sub- elevations of 4,670 to 4,700 feet. The Valent soil makes up stratum does not properly filter the leachate. Sewage about 60 percent of the unit, the Loup soil about 35 per- lagoons must be sealed. Once established, the lawns, cent. About 5 percent is dune sand. The Valent soil occu- shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass IVe ir- pies the hills and ridges and the Loup soil the depressions rigated, VIe nonirrigated; Deep Sand range site. or potholes. 70—Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes. This is a deep, The Valent soil is deep and excessively drained. It excessively drained soil on plains at elevations of 4,650 to formed in eolian deposits. Typically the surface layer is 5,100 feet. It formed in eolian deposits. Included in brown sand about 8 inches thick. The underlying material mapping are small areas of soils that have lime within a to a depth of 60 inches is brown sand. depth of 40 inches. Also included are small areas of soils Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is that have sandstone between 40 and 60 inches. moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or Typically the surface layer of the Valent soil is brown more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is sand about 6 inches thick. The underlying material to a low. depth of 60 inches is brown sand. The Loup soil is deep and poorly drained. It formed in Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is sandy alluvium. Typically the surface layer is very dark moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or grayish brown, mottled loamy sand about 16 inches thick. more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is The underlying material to a depth of 60 inches is light mow. brownish gray, mottled loamy sand and sandy loam. #sue.... n ® NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP WELD COUNTY, COLORADO UNINCORPORATED AREA PANEL 900 OF 1075 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED' i• • COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 080266 0900 C MAP REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 1982 federal emergency management agency 1 r ' 3 I ' ' tat h�k4.:;}:1:- Y z5� i1v co co /� rx1'm rr «r Ird y7itL ,.}�,AI 3r AMcc A g C 13 v�w$i %;s e �} ' k µf ��r a r 14 �� 4:44I 5.2 r4 ATE fi rt 4 q�,f€ 11 ' // El PL�kF yfi 7*�;w� l:it, 37 f- 4"- ' t 4 is \\ . 22 23 24 ICI) W 30 p% #I. ) , 4 T.,. ,. y a 1 27 26 25 k 7 1 J _____ ___ .„„.., ......_,, S , .) . . , r. . Ikc Ji n 73 ..: .. 4;r: 35 U I 34 CD I eCJ I ° � a JLJL / - - - II , I /�� O �� U o /j ° oo° i' �� II I/% II i3 2 II (7/ i�� u y o: fill! Hello