HomeMy WebLinkAbout830715.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING
AMENDMENTS TO THE SITE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY
FOR A WASTEWATER FACILITY
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, a Site Application of the City of Greeley for a
wastewater facility was approved by Resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado on the 18th day of
January, 1982 , and
WHEREAS, the Board has now been informed by the City of
Greeley that they wish to make amendments to said Site Applica-
tion, and
WHEREAS, the Board, after reviewing the amendments to the
Site Application, deems it advisable to approve said amendments ,
and
WHEREAS , a copy of the Site Application, with the amendments
initialed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, is attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, and
WHEREAS, said Site Application, with the amendments, shall
be submitted to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission by
the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the amendments to the
Site Application of the City of Greeley for a wastewater facility
be, and hereby are, approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that a copy of the
amended application, initialed by the Chairman of the Board, be
submitted to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission.
870715
%OMR
Page 2
RE: AMENDMENTS TO SITE APPLICATION - CITY OF GREELEY
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 2nd day of
February, A.D. , 1983 .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board C ck Carlso , Chairman
(BY: tee, x.1.O/ \ i ,1,. ;- 11 �,1!`�
/Deputy C�Clerk JoYn . Martin, �ro-Tem
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ater ,l _,
, Gene R. Brantner
(/. ...,
/) a a -
Coun y Attorney Norman Carlson
\\*4-1\\NNANr-
J cque ine John
DATE PRESENTED: February 7 , 1983
DEPAP,T;i ;I T CZ' I::AL1li •
dfLer Quality Co. tru1 Livisiun �•
421!) East lltlti f• -n:
Denver, Colorado C...2:0
•
APPLIC'eTI!?'t 1'fit SITE i.^?P`)V L OF CONSTRUCTION Or EXPANSION OF:
Jt"^u is::AiJ;_!ii r'L . +i ,' O
B) LIFT STATIONS HAVING OVER 20,000 GPO CAPACITY
APPLICANT: City of Greeley, Colorado
ADDRESS: Civic Center Coi lex, 919 7th Stret, Greeley, CO 80631 i'l!.ONE: 353-6123
Consulting Engineer's ::call.'. and Address: Engineers , Inc. , 801 Corporate Drive,
Lexinoton, Kentucky 40503 PHONE: (605)223-399)
A. Information reci rdina naw sewage treatment plant:
1. Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treaccent plant on this particular site. This should include, but is not
necessarily Limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site locaticn and service area.
2. SizS and type of treatment facility proposed: Type Activat,A Slud7e
GP 1(1•,C`cu.eOO PE design 1 1 C,cC 2 Present PE
(gal/clay) capacity ..z100-,Ofit _ to be served 60,000
% Domestic: 85S % Industrial : 15,;
3. Location of facility:
Attach a nap of the area which includes the following:
(a) 10-mile radius: all sewage treatment plants and lift stations.
(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Effluent will be discharged: To Cache La Poudre River
.04atercourse)
Subsurface disposal : Land:
Evaporation: Other: _
State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : 12
5. will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any portion of this
project? No
6. What is the present toning for the proposed service area? tlunicinal
Present aening or site area?
Zoning within a l-nile radius of sitel Ali '.: ir111C1i''.Il :on1l:n (. !i.i'•ielrles
•
WQ-:3(i'ev. 1-73-4O) - 1 -
r �
7. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest domestic water
supply intake? frame
(name and address of suppl-y)
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest other point
of diversion Cailvy irrigation and Land Company
(name and address of user)
26002 Weld County Road 60, Greeley, CO. 80631
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? City of Greeley
-Water and Sewer Denartment
9. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed? City of Greeley
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility.
10. Estimated project cost: $7,600.000
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? City of Greeley
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. 1. North Weld County Water
District, P.O. Box 56, Lucerne, Colorado 80646
2. Central Weld County Water District, 105 18th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
•
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. )
12. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? Yes
If so, what precautions are being taken? Flood protection diking and flood stage
Pumping
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources? Yes
If so, what is that designation? 100 vr. flood plain, CWCB Resolution 41 , 2/76/75
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Commission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
See Attachment '-1
•
•
/Q-3(rev. 1-78-40) - 2 -
r
B. Information reoardinn lift stations:
1 . The proposed lift station when fully developed will generate the following
additional load:
Population Equivalent
Peak Hydraulic (MGD) N/A to be served: N/A
2. Is the site located in a 100 year flood plain? N/A
If yes, on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharged? N/A
4. Name and address of facility providing treatment: N/A
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to N/A % of hydraulic and N/A % of, organic capacity.
C. . If the facility will be located on or adiacent to a site that is owned or manaced by
a Federal or State acency, send the acency a copy of this aoplication.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities :
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Arc the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201, 208, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Recommend Recommend No
-te Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
Local Government (Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
Sewer 'District) •
-18-82 X < ..
Board of County Commissioners
•
Local Health Authority
City/County Planning Authority •
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
certify that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Procedural
. Regulations for Site Applications for Sewage Treatment Works"
ate: / ., . , >
Signature of Applicant `
istrict Engineer Action:
•
:omvnend Approval : Recommend Disapproval :
ate:
Signature
0•-1lrev, t/78-A0
ATTACHMENT #1
INTRODUCTION
The Greeley Wastewater Treatment System, especially the First Avenue Waste-
water Treatment Plant, has been studied numerous times in recent years. The
comprehensive master plan for the system was begun in 1974 by Wright-McLaughlin
Engineers and subsequently adopted as the City's ' 201' Facilities Plan, with
final approval in the Spring of 1977. This plan called for the construction of
a new mechanical treatment plant at a new site east of the City. This site was
selected in a Predesign Report prepared in 1978 by CH2M HILL, Inc. Subsequently,
public opposition and an increase in the estimated cost of the new plant resulted
in an Amendment to the '201' plan, prepared by ARIX Engineers , Inc. , which se-
lected a Land Treatment System. This Amendment was approved in early 1981. The
Land Treatment System was to be partially financed by a Federal Grant pursuant
to PL92-500.
The City of Greeley originally held 1st priority on the 1981 Colorado Water
Quality Control Commission's priority list for receiving federal funds for con-
struction of the new Land Treatment System. However, the Reagan Administration
has reduced the availability of Construction Grants Funds which has lowered
Greeley's priority' to number 28. Coupled with the reduction of grant funds and
the announcement that there will possibly be no funding in Fiscal Year '82, it
appears that construction of the new Land Treatment System will be delayed for a
minimum of 3 years. Assuming that design and construction of the new system
would take at least an additional 3 years , the treatment system would not be
on-line until the late 1980's.
In March, 1980, the City of Greeley received a "Cease and Desist" order
due to numerous violations at the First Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant. In
response to this order, the City of Greeley contracted with GRW Engineers , Inc. ,
to perform a Composite Correction Program (CCP) . The CCP is designed to evaluate
the operational capability of the First Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant and
provide operational assistance to enable the City to meet the existing NPDES
permit. The CCP has been very successful and has alleviated the immediate danger
of the Colorado Department of Health imposing a tap moratorium. However, economic
and industrial growth, demonstrated by the recent announcement of plans for a
new Hewlett-Packard plant and the possibility that a large wet industry will
locate in Greeley, will require the City to develop an interim solution for
handling the City's wastewater treatment needs until the new treatment system
is on line.
The purposes of this report are:
. . .to evaluate Greeley's interim wastewater treatment needs ;
. . .to make a cost-effectiveness analysis of improvement
alternatives; and
. . .to develop an implementation schedule for upgrade to meet
these needs.
The study has included the investigation and analysis of the following:
.. .The treatment capabilities of both the First Avenue Treatment
Plant. and the .Lone Tree Lagoons were investigated to determine
their condition and useful life.
. . .Previous studies and reports were utilized to develop the pro-
jected treatment requirements of the City.
.. .Several expansion alternatives to treat the projected wastewater
demands were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS
As a result of the investigation of the existing and projected wastewater
flows and a review of the existing treatment capabilities , the following
conclusions arc made:
-2-
. . .The existing First Avenue Treatment Plant is currently
operating at maximum capacity. The capacity of the North-
side activated sludge plant is 6 MGD and the Southside
trickling filter plant is 2 MGD for a total capacity at
First Avenue of 8 MGD. The average flow-to the First Avenue
Treatment Plant for 1980 was 8. 1 MGD.
. . .Reduction in the availability of Construction Grant Funds
will result in a delay in implementation of the Facilities
Plan. It is anticipated that Federal Funds for construction
of the new Land Treatment System may not be available for
several years.
. . .The indefinite delay in implementing the Land Treatment System
and the current status of the First Avenue Treatment Plant
being at design capacity require that an interim treatment
scheme be developed immediately.
. . .Expansion of First Avenue's Southside treatment facilities is
not advisable due to the condition and age of the existing
equipment and structures. The Southside plant was originally
constructed in 1936 and upgraded in 1955. With some modifica-
tions. and continued improvement in operation and maintenance,
•
the Southside plant can continue to adequately treat 2 MOD of
wastewater. However, the older equipment can he expected to
require extensive maintenance.
. . .The First Avenue's Northside plant can be readily expanded to
treat 12 MGD of wastewater. The Northside could be expanded to
10 MGD now and further expanded to 12 NCO, if required at a later
date. This plan would enable the City to meet the interim
-3-
r
wastewater treatment requirements and allows the City ample
time to assess the long-term effects of the Federal Budget
cuts on the Land Treatment System.
. . .Treatment of the wastewater for nitrification will not be
required at the present. In April 1931 , the Colorado Water
Quality Control Commission published new standards which ef-
fectively changed the ammonia-nitrite effluent requirements
so that no more than "good secondary treatment" is required at
the First Avenue Treatment Plant.
. . .The use of the Lone Tree Lagoons to treat industrial wastewater
and the large distance between the Lone Tree and First Avenue
plants precludes the use of Lone Tree treating the additional
projected wastewater flows.
-4-
C
RESOLUTION
RE: ACTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING
THE SITE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF GREELEY FOR A
WASTEWATER FACILITY
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the City of Greeley, Colorado, is presently in •
the process of developing an expansion of the wastewater treat-
ment system to meet the future needs of the community, and
WHEREAS, the regulations of the Colorado Water Quality
Control Commission require a hearing for a site application
•
approval before construction may be started and further, that •
various local and state agencies be given the opportunity to
review and comment on the Site Application, and
WHEREAS, said Site Application has been submitted to the
Board of County Commissipners of Weld County, Colorado, for
•
its review and comment, and
WHEREAS, state law does not provide for a hearing before •
the Board of County Commissioners on a land use matter such as
this one, which is presented by a public entity, and
WHEREAS, the Board feels it is in the best interests of
Weld County to approve said Site Application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Site Application
of the City of Greeley for a wastewater facility be, and hereby
is, approved.
• • The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly
made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 18th
day of January, A.D. , 1982.
fJ Pi 0 .-l1„, ,(,(u,,, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: WELD COUNTY, COLORADO k '
We1d. County Clerk and Recorder /. - - %� 'F (Aye)
and Cl brk to the '.oted.i John-T :Mart ;- Chanan •
+1 u± Cis k Carl,on, 1'ro-Tem
Deputy Coun tyK Clerk f. --:mss- >_ (Aye)
// Norman�arl:or)
A1'FR, VED AS TO FORM: l�/; � <-�-/ (Aye)
• Z..
r G': '9. Y rby, .
, _fLi'.C-c��1 '"�,�LJ.��L:i^'1'�i (Aye)
County Attorney /June K. Steinmark
__ '• 1 DATE PRESENTED: JANUAR! 20, 19A2
•
RESOLUTION OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Moved by Wilbur Wafel that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it therefore Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the following
be adopted:
SITE APPLICATION - City of Greeley
REQUEST: Expansion of Existing First Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant
LOCATION: First Avenue, City of Greeley
That the Planning Commission instruct the Chairman to sign the application from
the City of Greeley for expansion of the First Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant
recommending approval to the Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control
Division.
Motion seconded by Bob Halleran
VOTE: For Passage Abstain Against
Wilbur Wafel
Norman Peterson
Bob Halleran
Fri Reichert
Tack Holman
Terry Kiefer
The Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy of this
Resolution be placed in the file of this case for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Robbie Good , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy
of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado adopted on
February 1 1983 , and recorded in Book No. VIII of the proceedings
of the said Planning Commission.
Dated the 2 day of February , 19 83 .
�otsita good.
Secretary
•
. LOR, E0 l:!'r'%•c:1H"1iT OF HEALTH •
. rcur Quality Ce„trol Clvisiun
rr l'i E.:r i i :.i :;vent:!
,cnvc�r, C,ioroCo 3 220
•
APPLIC\TlC`J_FG2 SITE APPROVAL. OF CONSTRUCTION OR EXPANSION OF:
A) I RI A *.N PL:•••i I AND
B) LIFT STATION S HAVING OVER 20,000 GPD CAPACITY
AI`PLiC '1T: Ci ! v of (:r•€'r'loy , Colorado
ADDRESS: Civic. Center Cor7)lex, 919 7th Street, Greeley,, CO C0631 PHONE: 353-612.3
Consulting Engineer's Nara and Address: GRW Engineers , Inc . , 801 Cor^orate Drive.
PHONE: (br�5)223-'''�'39
Lexinoton, l:entuckv 40503 ---
A. inforr,:sticn renardina new sewage treztr-nt plant:
1 . Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the reason for locating the sewage
treatment plant on this particular site. This should include , but is not
necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible development
of the site location end service area.
2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed: Type Activated Sl!.rdne
li?,Ccv,ccC-
GPD:10,030:603-O,030:600' PE design 1?-O CC`C Present FE
gal/dayj capacity ...:,100-;-05T. to be served 60,000
e
% Dorgstic: 85 % Industrial : 15 '
3. Location of facility:
Attach a map of the area which includes the following:
(a) 10-mile radius : all sewage treatment plants and lift stations .
(h) 5-mile radius : domestic water supply intakes.
(c) 1-rile radius : habitable buildings, location of potable water wells , and
an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Effluent will be discharged: To Cache La Poudre River
(Watercourse)
Subsurface disposal : Land:
Evaporation: Other:
State water quality classification of receiving watercourse(s) : 1;2
5. Will a State or Federal grant be sought to finance any- porticn of this
project? No
6. '!hat is the present zoning for the proposed service area? Municipal
Present zoning of site area? l'rdiu't Industrial
Zoning within a I-nile radius or site? Ali ! '1n1Ciral zonind CJLc':1ur1CS
•
t Q-3(r-ev. 1-73- 3) - 1 -
•
•
. . isthe disr,nc.e d ,+nstrtar from the stic w7 t•�r
� �� discharce to the nearest o::r;r_
anc ,,: ess of su;Ply)
is the distance 4o,.nstrezm from the dis:-•ar_e to the nearest other mint
cf d: ;e. ., ion ,t. 'rr c io-.
tram`: an: r ss O7 L.ser)
Weld County Road 60, Gretplev, CO. ED631
8. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility? City of Greeley
*,, ter and Sewer D?part!r»ant
9. • Who owns the landupon which the facility will be construc_cd7 City of Greeley
c:pies of the d curent creating autrtority in toe _pplicant to
cc^struct the proposed facility.
•
10. Estimated project cost: $7.600,000 •
Who is financially responsible for the construction and operation of the
facility? City of fire 1pv
11 . Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles downstream
of proposed wastewater treatment facility site. 1 . North Weld County Water
District, P.O. Box 56, Lucerne, Colorado 80645
2. Central Weld County Water District, 105 18th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631
(Attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. )
12'. Is the facility in a 100 year flood plain? Yes
If so, what precautions are being taken? Flood protection dikino and flood state
purnoinn
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation Board,
Department of Natural Resources? Yes
if so, what is that designation? 100 vr. flood plain, CWCB Resolution 41 , 2/26/75
13. Please include all additional factors that might help the Water Quality Control
Comission make an informed decision on your application for site approval .
Sege Attache ent 221
•
1Q-3(rcv. 1-7S-10) - 2 -
E . Ir`orr.ati :n rdir lift stations
1 . ... . _cs_c' lift station ., en fully ceve :. ed will cep rate the following
ro : . o .al
. cp.ulation EJivaltnt
ta draulic (-:D) '• 'r to be served: N'r. _.
2. Is the site to:ated in a 1DD NIA
flood plain? �A _
If yes , on a separate sheet of paper describe the protective measures to be taken.
3. Where will the overflow be discharced? N/A
4. t,a;r and address of facility providing treatrent: N/A
5. The proposed lift station when fully developed will increase the loading of the
facility to NIA % of hydraulic and N/A of, organic capacity.
•
C. If the facility will be located on or ad lacnt to a site that is owned or mar.aced by
a F=ederal or State acency, send the acency a copy of this application.
D. Recommendation of governmental authorities :
Please address the following issues in your recommendation decision. Are the proposed
facilities consistent with the comprehensive planning for the area and with other plans
including the 201 , 2C8, 209 and 303(e) plans? If you have any further comments or
questions, please call 388-6111 , Extension 378.
Re co,r:_nd Recommend
nd No
Hate Approval Disapproval Comment Sinnature of Retire ntative
2/2/51
1/1
Lo Government Cities or Towns, if inside
municipal boundary or within 3 miles, and
Sewer District)
•
Board of County Commissioners
Loeb Ne 1 th Authority
i C t? ounn ty P i ann i g Authority
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
State Geologist
I certify that signs have been posted in accordance with regulations entitled "Prccdural
Regulations for Site Applications for- S:rrage Treatment Works"
Cate: !
Signature of Applicant
District Engineer Action:
•
:o :end Approval : Recomend Disapproval :
.ate:
Signature
•
'WQ-3(r^-v. 1/7S-401
Date: Fe,cuary 1, 1983
CASE NUMBER: Site application
NAME: City of Greeley
REQUEST: Expansion of existing First Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOCATION: First Avenue, City of Greeley
THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE'S STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE
approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The Water Quality Division of the State Health Department has requested a
recommendation on a site application from the city of Greeley. The facility
is located within the municipal boundaries of the city of Greeley. The
Department of Planning Services staff recommends approval of the site plan
application. The application is for an expansion of a previous system that
has been approved by the State Health Department.
RA:rg
Jo)
()tV
�1 0
oni__a1_.®1c
CASE SUMMARY SHEET
Case Number: Site Application - City of Greeley
Size of Parcel:
Request : The city of Greeley would like to upgrade its First Avenue
Wastewater Treatment Plant from a ten (10) million gallon
per day plant to a twelve (12) million gallon per day plant.
Staff Member to Contact: Rod Allison
Possible Issues Summarized from Application Materials:
none
. . . �y —
N � .ra
a )
1‘, 4c0Stz tisistzvi
1 f 1 1
• .. , tee F
�'' 7 me
so
GREELEY CIVIC CENTER
GREE_EY. COLORADO 60631 January 18, 1983 ''44 "S*-.e.iliiRf
PHONE ,303, 353-6123
YS
Board of County Commissioners r J�
915 10th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
RE: FIRST AVENUE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO
In reference to our letter to your office of January 10, 1983, further
discussions with the State Health Department representatives have indi-
cated their concern that your office may not be aware of the specific
changes to the previously approved Site Application submittal forms.
As indicated in our letter, the City of Greeley proposes to upgrade its
facility to a 12 million gallon per day plant which will serve a popula-
tion equivalent of 120,000 people, instead of the originally proposed
expansion to a 10 MGD facility. This decision was based on the fact
that the additional -2 MGD could be incorporated into the plant expansion
by simply modifying the plant's existing structures. I would like to add
that guidelines for plant expansion indicate that a design for a new faci-
lity or expansion to an existing facility should be started when actual
plant loading reaches 80% of its designed capacity. It is proposed that
when the plant expansion is completed in 1985 , wastewater flows from the
City of Greeley would be approximately 80% of the designed capacity of a
10 MGD facility. The City will enjoy a significant cost savings by de-
signing a 12 MGD plant at this point in time instead of adding the 2 MGD
to this facility in two years.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Site Application form as approved by
your office and as submitted to the State for their review. To verify
your understanding of the aforementioned change, and to satisfy the re-
quirements of the State, we ask that you review the changes and if you
"A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS"
Page Two
approve, please sign or initial the items crossed through and changed on
the first page of the form. We have enclosed the entire form as first
approved by your office to show that no additional changes have been made.
I will be more than happy to discuss this matter with you further should
you desire.
Thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
jiLS—
Peter A. Morrell
City Manager
PAM/ld
Enclosure
cc: C. William Hargett, Jr. , P.E.
Mark H. Rybus
Dan A. Hawkins , P.E.
Hello