The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About991696.tiff I W' " OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 61/113 010 Coolewd&bldg., 1313 Slrormnn St, Denver,Colorado 00203 (303) 6663501 PRIOR 1O COMPLETING FORM, SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE ' CHANGE IN OWNERSI-IIP/ADDRESS / LOCATION WELL PERMIT, LVESTOCK TANK OR EROSION CONTROL DAM I. NEW OWNER . NAME(S) Jerry T. Bess and Jeannie Bess Mailing Addrbss y,/ cl cL //ti 2)/Z City, SI. Zip f.0' Qv/mi ., 6> cYo A) s Phone ( 770 ) .S,4.. 2. THIS CHANGE IS FOR ONE OF TI IE FOLLOWING: WELLPEnM17NUMBER. 1-11545, 4-11546, 5-11547,6-11548, 7-11549, s-TTSSo, 9=1'1551 ❑ LIVESTOCK WATER TANK NUMBER ❑ EROSION CONTROL DAM NUMBER 3. WELL LOCATION: COUNTY Weld OWNER'S WELL DESIGNATION (Address) (City)EM (Slain) (ilp)•1/AI/o/1/,I//////T%r(,/Sec 8 Twp 7 O N. or ❑S., Range 65 ❑ E. or El W. 6th P.M. Distances from Section Lines FL from❑ N. or ❑S. Line, Ft. train❑ E. or ❑W. Line. Subdivision Lot Block Filing (Unit) 4. LIVESTOCK TANK OR EROSION CONTROL DAM LOCATION; COUNTY 1/4, Soc. Twp, ❑N. or❑S., Range ❑ E. or ❑W. P.M. 5. The above listed owner(s) say(s) Thal he (they) own rho structure described herein. The existing record Is being amended for the (allowing reason(s): ❑ Change in name of owner. ❑ Change In mailing address. ❑ Correction of location. G. I (we) have read the statements made herein, know the contents thereof, and state that they are true to my (our) knowledge. (Pursuant to Section 24-4-104 (13)(a) c.n.s., the making of false statements hprain constitutes perjury in the second degree and is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.] Name/Tllle (Please type or print) ' Signature Dale Jerry T. Bess Jeannie Bess , r _ Fon OFFICE USE ONLY EXHIBIT • Stole Engineer 0y Dels Court Case No. Div. Co. • WD _ Basin MD I' 991696 11&-STOCK TRANSFER ORDER February 9 , 1999_ For value received we hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Jerry T. Bliss and Jeannie Bliss In Joint Tenancy all.---9Ar right, title and interest in and to one ( 1) _-_--_-_-_..shares of the capital stock of The Larimer & wlild Irrigation C npany_._____________-._----_-__---_._-_.._as evidenced by certificate No.--_5-4.4 a _-of said company. And we _--_...hereby authorize and empower the secretary of said company to cancel said certificate and issue a new certificate or certificates to effectuate this transfer on the books of the company. Harold Tateyama rst--3ons , .g Color G neral Partenersh In presencs f b ----./ ‘ �p � � � � p Harold Tateyama \ fc /v-ix x (__ __J‘-_ -.___. by DaYyl Tateyama 11&—STOCK TRANSFER ORDER .,-_... .,.i .i. February 9_, , 19.9-3 For value received...-We-. hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Jerry T. Bess and Jeannie Be$ r In Joint Tenancy all our right, title and interest in and to one__ .1_)____-_____.___--_________-__-___..-shares of the capital stock of The Latimer__- &_ _Weld_Rase _ as evidenced by certificate No..7018 of said company. And we hereby aul orize and empower the secretary of said company to cancel said certificate and Issue a new certificatE or certi ales to effepittace this transfer on the books of the company. Harold Tateyama an �S ns a Colora(do 1.. eral Partenershi In presence o (� ^I n b\./ a`oTd�Tateya 7 Q. (li�. • �/c by - -- ......7:4__C... Dar, re_. at ama 10/20/98 TUE 09:23 FAX 9706 .024 CDS ENGINEERING 2002 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS AND SEPTIC SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS PART OF THE NE% OF SECTION 8, T.7 N. , R. 65 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR SHANNON SKELTON • • • CDS ENGINEERING CORPORATION LOVELAND, COLORADO PROJECT NUMBER • 98-9699 OCTOBER 19, 1.998 EXHIBIT .4'3 10/20/98 TUE 09:23 FAX 9706' 4024 CDS ENGINEERING 003 CDSEngineering Corporation • October 19, 1998 Project No. 98-9699 Mr. Shannon Skelton 412 Idalia Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525. Dear Shannon, Enclosed is the report you requested of the percolation test results and septic system recommendations for the proposed. residential buildings to be located on part of the NE% of Section. 8, T.7 N. , R. 65 W. of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. The site is suitable for the construction of the proposed septic systems, provided the design criteria and recommendations given in this report are met . If you should have any questions concerning the information in. the report, plee.se feel free to contact this office . Respectfully, CDs ENGINEER 'fir -.� _�. k::o An . Wernsmah., , P:E.. .,.,F AJW/pkw Enclosures 165 2nd Street S.W. • Loveland, CO 80537 • (970)667-8010 • Fax: (970) 667-8024 10/20/98 TUE 09:24 FAX 9706' -4024 CDS ENGINEERING II004 TABLE OF CONTENTS nag Letter of Transmittal 1 Table of Contents ii Scope 1 Site Investigation - 1 Site Location and Description 1 Subsoil and Groundwater Conditions 1, 2 Percolation Test Results 2, 3 Combination Absorption and Evapotranspiration Area - Hatchery Site 3 , 4 Standard Design - Hatchery Site 3 .4 Water Balance Design - Hatchery Site 4 Combination Absorption and Evapotranspiration Area — House Site 5, 6 Standard Design - House Site 5 Water Balance Design - House Site 6 Required Septic Tank Size 6 Septic System Recommendations 6 Conclusions 7 Location of Test Borings Drawing No. 1 Symbols and Soil Properties Diagram No. 1 Log of Borings Drawing Nos . 2-1 and 2-2 Combination Absorption and Evapotranspiration System Drawing Nos . 3-1 and 3-2 General Maintenance Recommendations Appendix I Water Balance Table Appendix II ii 10/20/98 TUE 09:24 FAX 9706°'S024 CDS ENGINEERING flf005 1 SCOPe This report provides percolation test results and septic system recommendations for a proposed residential home and hatchery site to be located on part of the NE% of Section 8, T.7 N. , R. 65 W. of the 6C° P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. SITE INVESTIGATION A field investigation, performed on October 15, 1998, consisted of drilling two (2) test holes to a depth of eight feet (8 ' ) and twelve (12) percolation holes to an average depth of twenty inches (20" ) . Percolation tests were performed on October 16 , 1998 . Two (2) field sites were drilled. One (1) is for the house site, and one is for the hatchery site. The Location of the. Test Holes is shown on Drawing No. 1 . A Log of Borings are shown. on Drawing Nos . 2-1 and 2-2 . SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located east of the Town of Ault, Weld County, Colorado, north of Highway 14. The site slopes slightly to the northeast, and vegetation consists of small brush. SUBSOILS AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Topsoil - Approximately six inches (6' ) of topsoil overlies the site. The topsoil should be stockpiled and used as backfill over the absorption field. ,San. Silty Clay - Brown to tan, damp to wet, stiff to soft, sandy silty clay was encountered beneath the topsoil to a depth of approximately four feet (4 't) . 10/20/98 TUE 09:25 FAX 9706°"4024 CDS ENGINEERING Q006 2 Sand and Gravel - Moist to wet, sand and gravel was encountered beneath the sandy silty clay to depths varying from six to eight feet (6 ' -8 ' ) . Bedrock - Tan and gray, wet to moist, weathered claystone/siltstone bedrock was encountered beneath the sand and gravel to a depth of eight feet (8 ' ) , where drilling operations ceased (TPH 1 only) . Groundwater was encountered in the test holes twenty-four (24) hours after drilling at a depth of 40" in TPH 1 and 6 . 5 ' in TPH 2 . PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS A total of six (6) percolation tests were run on each site, using the Standard Test Method, as described by the Weld County Health Department . Percolation test holes were presoaked on October 15, 1998, and the test was performed on October 16, 1998 . Test results varied between 80 and 120 minutes per inch with an average of 107 minutes per inch for the hatchery site. Percolation Holes Percolation Rate (moi) PH 1 80 PH 2 80 PH 3 120 PH 4 120 PH 5 120 PH 6 120 Avg. 107 10/20/98 TUE 09:25 FAX 9706° 4024 CCD S ENG TWEE ING (x007 3 Test results did not vary with an average of 120 minutes per inch for the house site. Percolation Holes percolation Rate (mai) PH 1 120 PH 2 120 PH 3 120 PH 4 120 PH 5 120 PH 6 120 Avg. 120 COMBINATION ABSORPTION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AREA STANDARD DESIGN - HATCHERY SITE • From Pages 28 and 35 from the I .S.D. S.R. for Weld County: Absorption Area • (Aa) = n IT x 1 .3, and 3 .5 Evapotranspirations Area (Ae) = $ x 586 Lake Evap rate (in/yr) Q = Estimated maximum quantity of sewage flow in gallons per day = ADF x 150% T = Percolation Rate in minutes per inch = 107 min/in Lake Evaporation rate at the site = 45 in/yr. Since the percolation rate is 107 min/inch and only 60 min/in can be used for absorption, 60 min/inch 107 min/inch = . 56 = 56% of the flow can be used for absorption. Therefore, 44% must be used for evaporation. 10/20/98 TUE 09:25 FAX 9706r-4024 CDS ENGINEERING Q008 4 Therefore, Aa = ( .56) O IT x 1 .3, and Ae = ( .44) O x 5$¢ 3 .5 45 No. of Bedrooms 0 Area (Aa) Area (Ae1 1 393 .8 847 2256 2 450 . 0 968 2578 3 675 . 0 1452 3868 Each Additional 225 . 0 484 1289 Therefore, the recommended septic field size is : Number of Bedrooms Ot Absorption Area (5a. Ft . ) 1 393 .8 3103 2 450 . 0 3546 3 675 . 0 5320 Each Additional 225. 0 Add 1773 WATER BALANCE DESIGN - HATCHERY SITE Using the water balance method (from Boulder County) (see Appendix III) : Number of Bedrooms Combination Bed Area (5a. Ft . ) 3 2400 10/20/98 TUE 09:26 FAX 9706""4024 COS ENGINEERING 2 009 5 COMBINATION ABSORPTION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AR$A STANDARD DESIGN - HOUSE SITE From Pages 28 and 35 from the I .S.D.S.R. for Weld County: Absorption Area (Aa) = n IT x 1 . 3, and 3 .5 Evapotranspirations Area (Ae) = O x 586 Lake Evap rate (in/yr) Q = Estimated maximum quantity of sewage flow in gallons per day = ADF x 150% T = Percolation Rate in minutes per inch = 120 min/in Lake Evaporation rate at the site = 45 in/yr. Since the percolation rate is 120 min/inch and only 60 min/in. can be used for absorption, 60 min/inch 120 min/inch = . 50 = 50% of the flow can be used for absorption. Therefore, 50% must be used for evaporation. Therefore, Aa = ( . 50) O IT x 1 .3, and Ae = ( . 50) O x 586 3 .5 45 No . of Bedrooms O Area (Aa) Area (Ae) 1 393 .8 801 2564 2 450 . 0 915. 2930 3 675.0 1373 4395 Each Additional 225 . 0 458 1465 Therefore, the recommended septic field size is : Number of Bedrooms Ot Absorption Area (Sc. Ft . ). 1 393 . 8 3365 2 450 .0 3845 3 675 .0 5768 Each. Additional 225 . 0 Add 1923 10/20/98 TUE 09:26 FAX 9706°'4024 CDS ENGINEERING 2010 6 WATER BALANCE DESIGN - HOUSE SITE Using the water balance method (from Boulder County) (see Appendix III) : Number of Bedrooms Combination Bed Area (Sa. Ft . ). 3 2400 REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK SIZE Number of Bedrooms Minimum Tank Capacity (gals . ) Three (3) or less 1, 000 Four (4) 1, 250 Each Additional Add 250 SEPTIC SYSTEM RECDMMRNDATTCNS. Recommended is a compartmented septic tank of the. required size to be followed by a combination absorption and evapo- transpiration field with a bottom area of 1773 square feet and 1923 square feet for each bedroom, to be located in the residence, except for one (1) bedroom, for the hatchery and house sites, respectively. The water balance method and field could also be used. Because a minimum four feet (4 ' ) of suitable soil is required beneath the bed to any limiting zone (groundwater) , the field at the hatchery site will need to be mounded approximately three feet (3 ' ±) , or the bottom of the bed placed a minimum one foot (1 ' ) above existing grade. The beds should be constructed in accordance with Section 9 .3 .3, 9 .3 . 6, and 9 .3 . 8 of the I . S .D.S .R. for Weld County (see Drawing Nos . 3-1 and 3-2) . The bed should lie a minimum of ten feet (10 ' ) from property lines and twenty feet (20 ' ) from the proposed residence. This system is to meet all rules and regulations set forth by the Weld County Health Department . The system is to be inspected by a representative of the Weld County Health Department prior to backfilling. 10/20/98 TUE 09:27 FAX 9706R'8024 CDS ENGINEERING Z011 7 CONCLUSIONS All future owners are to be directed to information in Appendix I (General Maintenance Recommendations) of this report . The findings and recommendations of this report have been obtained in accordance with accepted engineering practices in the field of Geotechnical Engineering. There is no other warranty, either expressed or implied. 10/20/98 TUE 09:27 FAX 9706P-8024 CDS ENGINEERING IIO12 • . i I{ouSE SITE rats \ Pitt Pw$ Pk'* B Z'DN B192. i owa Palo PIFtt - Int P1. sPk, Prr6 9 :i--- 9 RATC&keRY P444 5ITE i LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS DRAWING DRAWN en 43 W ®, LOCATION OF TEST ht LE ari: I WO • LOCATION OF PERCOLATION IIOLF 1 10-I9-90 7------ _ PNOJECT �,Cb3_ENfINlriiTNG,CARP: NO. 98' 9699 10/20/98 TUE 09:27 FAX 9706--4024 8s -IBOLS AND SOIL ENGINEERING TIES C�ois DIAGRAM NO. 1 SOIL AND ROCK SAMPLERS CLAY (CL,OL,1.41.CH,OH) : CALIFORNIA 1 ‘,fr SILT (ML.OL) THIN-WALLED SAND (SW,SP,SM,SC) - II SPLIT BARREL s:5 GRAVEL (GW,GP,GM,GC). SAG SAMPLE WO WEATHERED ROCK PITCHER • < E+ SHALE & CLAYSTONE JAR SAMPLE SANDSTONE ' PENETRATION RESISTANCE FOR COMESIONLESS SOILS ON STRENGTH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COHESIVE SOIL BASIS OF THE STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NUMBER OF BLOWS PER. FT. , N * RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY COHESION, KSF** 0 - 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT _ LESS THAN 0 .5 • 4 . 10 LOOSE FIRM 0 . 5 - 1 . 0 10 - 30 MEDIUM STIFF 1 . 0 - 2.0 30 • 50 DENSE VERY STIFF 2.0 . 4 . 0 OVER 50 VERY DENSE HARD GREATER THAN 4 ,0 °} BLOWS PER FOOT • BLOW OF 140 LB. . ** EQUIVALENT TO PP/2 AND OU/2 HAMMER DROPPED 30 IN. TO DRIVE 2• INC. SPLIT-BARREL SAMPLER ONE • FOOT (ASTM DL586-67 ) . 10/20/98 TUE 09:28 FAX 9706" "9024 CDS ENGINEERING 141014 LOG OF BORINGS - 4ATU+ERY 51TE - TPA I PR I P141 PHA Nit PUS P44 6 0 rane. 17 Tnaps;ik;:cifitiy a _ �•F bow /*. ita, damp* wmo7s4 •� wog./ 4 to , aw1 awl Gravel --- Nortek- io Jr px_re2`•s We+ s.j"'nat -- Taw iaJ Stitt kae4 4f 1? Well i W I+era. Glay#t%wr i lks•4dl.e_ Ia • Driller .: 10- 15 -98 \� DRAWING NO. Drp+L 'Iv &vou„aw.+ems uw I0-16- 9$ 2 - I PROCDS ENGINEERING CORPORATION 14°' 8- 9699 10/20/98 TUE 09:28 FAX 9706'"4024 CDS ENGINEERING O015 UI II LOG OF BORINGS HOUSE CITE TPA 1 PH'[ PH8 PH 9 Pith Pµ It P811 ”o. rim Fir.7 irtA tird Trail Cr* A VO 2" Iny mn►a% 5 j Solid awl Cwuet -- Maisie it Ia • • Dr;Ilerl: IU- is -98 DRAWING NO. -� Drp+L - GrouJwa4er ow 10-16- 90 2 _2 CDS ENGINEERING CORPORATION NO. §8- 96 53 I-^ 0 N 0 CCI MOUNDED -- HATCHERY 5JTE -- 'COMBINATION ABSORPTION `AND f EVAPOTRANSPIRATION SYSTENf ,. Bottom surface of bed should be roughened before 1 construction of bed and trenches to avoid laving SEEPAGE BED DETAIL a penet_atian resistant interface between natural 0• soil and fill. .• N 2. Distribution pipes should be laid level. The m MOUND SYSTEM WITH PVC LINED BERM pipes should be interconnected far bade. I 'L7 Y PVC P[RFCMA-t: STIP)/ ALL EPICS IMTIM:MN F:TrOyeros ' 9 to MIL PVC IAMB ER EITEMEEO FROM TOP OF EEO TO IV SE'?M [ATe OF 1E3 ]. A the gravel end or ill.pape shall be 1LSBd between // \ L and yesub. Four inches (4") of "pea" gravel may be substituted for the straw or i 0 COMPACTED eIQFILL 'r ^^ Parer. O EASING mecum SLMPLC! .\5- moms IEI t 4. Hackflll shall consist of natural on-site notarial. � ' 'i Heavy elan should not be used as beckfill. Site -e MiM.uy aMO MINE ON IOTIOIM uuFar fns inches (4") shall be suitable soil for na ALL Lillis supporting vegetation. a MINIMUM 4'0$1114 OF EATABLE SOIL MEOW SEEPAGE EEO TO LAY 5. Map of bed shall be aidesloped about twopercent (2%) LEVI,. and aid pants positive drainage away from bed. The S nexinm slope for any septic systaa is thirty pecent (30%). • A A ! 6. Surface of bad net usable under traffic areas, either animal or machinery. Vegetation over bed should be durable and tolerate both wet and dry periods. MOUND SYSTEM WITH IMPERVIOUS CLAY BERM i II . r n DISTRIBUTION ■oz 7. Surface of bed and ttend+es should receive sunlight. En INLET--- 1'-a I' Shade trees near system not recommorded. pr, I • COMPAGTEG MPtWgUS CLAY SERM I.MAX. 8. This system to meet all applicable WTI, Candy Health C SEE?AGE KO Al Stop Department Rules and Regulations set forth in the Individual z ,.--L �Y' - E 2% slot SLOP[ I I Savage Disposal System Regulations. [vy T.M.tl' M M LINIa a. r. , 'i4. 6 9. A tq.4.e ntative of COS CORPORATIQI and the EXISTING SOIL -- t t—r----- r Weed County Health Daparbt of should be contacted far I z sarinas& S2' will.mralMa inspection prior to placement of backfill. Inspections 'n MNMUM L'DEPTH OF SUTAILI SOIL SLOW SEEPAGE BED . Si! MOTE a SAND I I SANG by the Engineer are an additional charge. 1' MIM T �- ;w� . ^` -. :z. MIN. I 'NO. BEDROOMS .BED-TRENCH AREA(S.P.). 5t' —9 I Lx' MIN. Y,AN$APD WATER-MM • a:a• _C•w�'••2' WASH!. �A ,.PO AA lit ACAS I BIOS ROCK CR I UI,ALI Xt PACING ao'NSWA;: a 3S4G 3 Salo MOO SECTION A-A. each addlt!onal ADD: 1773 ,1 REM11ARKS : q' t//11 SIa(4a oe et Y-etut� 6eksat CMtt a ., n en a tall✓ Lit.. Lr)_ t.ewe ear.•. {MNM_.w et F_i L it NOTE 1Id`riL I Kft 'UK L ITn( Ro�io gINCI jI above aets44.5 erns (al ,oppren(a.4t a, ~saw ij BE 5UBSl1TU7ED 5liL`1POR r$-E �q GRAVEL BERMS 0wM. CLIENT: nuke. .S614n. PROJECT NC.: '5s—9655 DRAWING NC.: .3-L COS E.NGNEESNG CORPORATON Ial Ti rn • • i.. 0 ra 0 COMBINATION ABSORPTION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 'SYSTEM€ HOUSE SITE -- z: .._._.. to - ,'.1:'- Bottom surface of bed should be roughened before con- c .4' PVC PERFORATED (TYP) 7 struction of bed-and-trenches to avoid having a pene-- co �f ALL ENDS INTERCONNECTED tration resistant interface between natural soil and •• 1 cm fill 2. Distribution pipes should be laid level. The pipes ,O should be interconnected for beds. - k a 3. A layer of straw or piper shall be used between the gravel and backfill. Four inches (4') of 'pee' gray 4.51 - ' el may be substituted for the straw or paper. o • 1. 4. Backfill shall consist of natural on-site material. - cm Heavy clays should not be used as backfill. The up- I - - per four inches (4') shall be suitable soil for sup- o ALL LINES - • - • porting vegetation. - ma a S. Top of bed shall be side-sloped about two percent TO LAY (2%) and promote positive drainage away from bed. LEVEL The maximum slope for any septic system is thirty .. . X percent (30%). y 4 f 6. Surface of bed not usable under traffic areas, eith- V ` •1' er animal or machinery. Vegetation over bed should . a be durable and tolerate both wet and dry periods. . A A 7. Surface of bed and trenches should receive sunlight. c] — • Shade trees near system not recommended. CI _ - 8. This system to meet all applicable Weld .County ; - i - - Health Department Rules and Regulations set forth in m the Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. 6i DISTRIBUTION BOX / :( ww i g. A representative of CDS MISCUING CORPORATION '�• OM INLET�i 18'-38' and the Weld County health Department should CM be contacted for inspection prior to placement of 22 6' MAX. backfill. Inspections by the Engineer are an addi- - Lionel charge. L] 2% SIDE SLOPE. - ' INO. BEDROOMS .BED-TRENCH AREA(S.F.) . .} _ 3T NMRe NATER & AaKE � I I 1 2 3842 ` - -1.-ar-.WIctINR I 12' MIN. o SEE NOTE 3 i SAND I -WICMIN6 0 3 2768 2100 SAND 2' MIN. - a each addltlondi ADD' 144$ a r t, r m 8 T e ray 6- MIN- `o REMARKS: . d -s,.4: j 12' WILT NOTE: INFILTRATOR CMNBE% - 3/4' TO 2 1/2' WASHED\\- PERFORA IONS MAN BE SuR5TiTUTED FOR ... POCK OR EQUIVALENT FACING DOWNWARD li-E GRAVEL HOUNDS 5s1ww1• CLIENT: 5Lai,amn 'Sk ko.a PROJECT NO.: tK_9G99 • SECTION A-A DRAWING NO.: 3 _Z ' CDS ENGINEERNG CORPORATION S ,e 4D iAracar- .n.0-w.. . .. . ' . ... gl v 10/20/98 TUE 09:30 FAX 9706 " 1024 CDS ENGINEERING 2018 APPENDIX I GENFRAL MAIN ENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS The following ,recommendations, if followed, should help increase the lifetime of the system: 1 . Septic tanks should be pumped a minimum of once every four years . 2 . Septic tanks and distribution boxes should be checked at least once a year for sludge accumulation which may clog the leach area if overflow occurs . 3 . The leach area should not be used for grazing, sports activities, traffic, or other activity which may compact the soils. 4 . Schedule 80 pipe should be used if lines are to be placed under driveways . • 5 . Trees should not be planted near the leach area so as to prevent roots from clogging the system. 6 . If trees are to be planted nearby, they should be located so that the leach area is not shaded. 7 . Overuse of strong chemicals, which may kill the bacteria in the system and inhibit decomposition of the sewage, should be avoided. 8 . Positive drainage should be maintained over and around the absorption field area to prevent pooling of water. 9 . Lines to the tank or leach area should have sufficient ground cover to prevent freezing. REV 07/10/96 WATER BALANCE TABLE ' 3 BEDROOMS PERC 60-120 0 • N, Pa. • 2400 Co 1 2 - 3 4 _ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 °o PRECIP _ PRECIP AVERAGE FLOW AVERAGE FLOW BED -EFFLUENT ET RATE ET RATE ABSORP ABSORP WATER BALANCE RATE RATE 3 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM ARM LOADING RATE RATE RATE PRECIP.LOAD.ET.MS MONTH DAYS/M IN GPMO/SOFT GPO GPMO SOFT GPMO/SOFT IN/MONTH GPMO/SOFT GPD/SOFT GPMO/SOFT GPMO/SOFT til . o 0 AUG 31 1.31 0.62 450 13950 2400 5.81 6.65 4.15 0.15 4.65 -217;', SEPT 30 1.06 t16 450 13500 2400 5.63 4.81 3.00 0.15 4.50 4.710 OCT 31 127 0.79 450 13950 2400 5.81 3.49 2.18 0.15 4.65 -0.23T NOV '30 . 1.07 0.67 •450 • 13500 2400 5.63 1.90 1.22 0.15 4.50 0.58 DEC 31 0.78 •0A9 450 13950 2400 . 5.81 1.61 1.00 0.15 4.65 0.65'4 JAN 31 0.5 0.37 450 13950 2400 5.61 1.61 1.03 0.15 4.65 0.538 FEB 28 0.72 0.45 450 12600 2400 525 1.70 1.00 0.15 4.20 0.50 'AR 31 .1.63 1.02 450 13950 2400 5.61 2.60 1.75 0.15 4.65 0.450 ..PR '30 ' 2.16 1.35 450 13500 2400 5.63 4.18 2.59 0.15 4.50 4.11 a MAY 31 3.00 1.87 450 13950 2400 5.61 5.42 3.38 0.15 4.65 -0.35 JUN 30 2.22 1.38 450 1350D 2400 5.63 6.54 4.06 0.15 4.50 -1.57 JUL 31_ 1.02 1.23 450 13950 2400 5.81 7.15 4.46 0.15 4.65 -2.07 -4.50 EFFLUENT VOLUME 6504 a BED VOLUME 11,689' b'1 IF BED VOLUME IS LESS 0 THAN EFFLUENT VOLUME z INCREASE BED AREA z .. tiD cm 4r. VI • . .. ,.. . I1 0 f- 0 � z mttleApplegate,lnc. Consultants for Land,Mineral and Water Development March 11, 1999 Mr. Bill McIntyre State Engineer's Office 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: Application for a Substitute Water Supply Plan for a Fish Hatchery Operation at the Tateyama Property Dear Bill- Enclosed is the substitute supply plan submitted on behalf of Colorado Fisheries. It is proposed that five wells on the Tateyama farm be used for the subject operation. Five well permit applications are being submitted concurrent with this plan. If you have any questions or need additional information,please call me at(303) 452- 6611. Cordially, TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC. Steve Nguyen encs. cc: File#98-238 May Cunning, Water Commissioner District 1 Shawn Hoff, Water Commissioner District 3 Dave Nettles,Assistant Division 1 Engineer Shannon Skelton, Colorado Fisheries Gene Fischer, Fischer&Fischer,LLP EXHIBIT 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304• Denver, Colorado 80233 • (303) 452-6611 • Fax (303) 452-2759 COLORADO FISHERIES SUBSTITUTE WATER SUPPLY PLAN Prepared By: a ttleApplegate,Mc. TA#98-238RS March 11, 1999 INTRODUCTION The proposed operation is located in Weld County, approximately 2 miles east of the Town of Ault. The site is located in the E %3 of Section 8, Township 7 N, Range 65 W, 6th P.M. Figure No. 1 is a vicinity map of the subject site. The operation will impact Lone Tree Creek in the form of depletions due to evaporation. The Tateyama farm is 200 acres. Colorado Fisheries has purchased the north 80 acres along with 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company and 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company. Figure No. 2 shows the 80 acres and the subject operation. There are 7 wells on the property that are augmented under the Cache la Poudre Water Users Association. Five wells are used to supplement the surface water rights by providing additional water for irrigation. Two wells currently do not have pumps. Both surface water and groundwater was placed in the concrete ditch and syphoned out for irrigation. Groundwater will be pumped from the wells through an underground pipeline to 6 rearing ponds. The water will pass through the ponds and collect in the tailwater pond. This water will then be piped back to the concrete ditch and used for irrigation as historically. During the winter months, water will be routed through the ponds into the proposed recharge pond. The only new consumptive use due to this subject operation is evaporation. Excavation of the rearing ponds and tailwater pond will not intercept the groundwater table. The proposed recharge pond will be excavated below the water table. The five wells will be used for this operation and 5 well permit applications, along with the fee, are being submitted concurrent with this plan. The five well permit applications are to include the evaporation component from the ponds prior to the water being used for irrigation as historically. Appendix A contains a copy of the well permit applications. PROJECTED CONSUMPTIVE USE Water use at the site will consist of evaporation from the rearing ponds, tailwater pond, and recharge pond. There will not be any other consumptive uses associated with this operation. Evaporative Losses The total water to be exposed in this operation is approximately 2.0 acres. The 6 rearing ponds will be 24 feet wide by 150 feet long, which is approximately 0.5 acres. The tailwater pond will be approximately 1.0 acre and the recharge pond will expose approximately 0.5 acres. Consequently, the total exposed surface area is 2.0 acres. The gross annual evaporation is 45 inches at the subject location, taken from NOAA Technical Report NWS 33, Evaporation Atlas for the Contiguous 48 United States. The annual mean precipitation is 14.2 inches. The precipitation was taken from the Colorado Climate Center for the Greeley UNC station and a copy is enclosed for your reference in Appendix B. The values used for evaporation and precipitation were approved by your Page 1 office in the Firestien substitute supply plan, M96060, for the Greeley UNC station. The effective precipitation is computed to determine the net evaporation from the exposed groundwater. The effective precipitation is calculated as 70 percent of the total precipitation. The net evaporation is then determined by subtracting the effective precipitation from the gross evaporation. The net annual lake evaporation at the site is 2.9 feet. Thus, the resulting net annual evaporative consumptive use from the 2.0 exposed acres is 5.8 acre-feet. These results can be seen on Table No. 1. The evaporation is lagged approximately 3000 feet from Lone Tree Creek. The timing of the evaporation was found by using a stream depletion model based on Glover techniques. A pump test was performed for this location. The transmissivity for this site is 80,000 gpd/ft. Also enclosed in Appendix B is a copy of the page from the USGS publication, Colorado Groundwater Circular No. 11, "Pumping Tests in Colorado," showing this information. A value of 0.2 was used for the specific yield,which is typical of an alluvial aquifer. The impermeable boundary was estimated using the USGS miscellaneous investigation series map, "Well Yields and Chemical Quality of Water, Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area." The boundary was found to be at approximately 6700 feet from the river. The last column in Table No. 1 shows the lagged evaporation realized at the stream. The evaporation stream depletion model can be seen in Appendix C. BACKGROUND ON IRRIGATION AND RESERVOIR COMPANY Shares in the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company are not very senior and typically only yield between mid-May and mid-June of each year. The Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company was constructed to provide additional water to the irrigation shareholders when the ditch shares were no longer yielding. The companies are separate entities and farmers under the ditch own shares in each. The way the companies work together is that the irrigation shares will deliver first each year. This is called the "river run." Once the river stops delivering, a clean break is made and reservoir water is ordered. This is the "reservoir run." The companies do not like to mix river water with reservoir water. The irrigation and reservoir shares combined supply water to the farmer for the entire irrigation season. HISTORIC USE OF WATER RIGHTS ON FARM The water rights associated with the farm are 4 shares of Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company, 4 shares of Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company, and 2 shares of Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company. Again, there are 7 irrigation wells on the property augmented under the Cache la Poudre Water Users Association(Poudre Plan). The wells were historically used to provide supplemental water to the surface water rights. According to the landowner,the wells have always been used to supplement the surface Page 2 ,� � ' , Ida k 7' (4 i II {' �' `'t . NE CORNER site 6, ' T7N, R65W� a-*� xn I f -\220 f , e Q t z ,r. { h { l8 'fc. ' % v i' v t/Orfq y9+ -'§�yt IP p o- ; 4: .ea ,t1 s Ik e 1,t d n ✓*` ,1 1444 � ',3' fit +' a awr,wn ^ q�#,e„m+w;mN.t;x a y °iw_y-x o t t, gg '€5A 4 tip r., 3ii> t t, r 3`a Y'�� - 4 rrr E2 ;2'4 5 w ,.�' , a a r : 'yA `' if."' si.t;F -p 2 w s T'W pry ma+' 4 mR ' € €�2 p *x e, i'12,,,Atetllip4 x z /4 r"..,:—.--22*-222.-;"*.114-"*.'..- - I II i /1 a ht > 'x Y t',t b y s,',,L E,rt H i fr, b 3 did , rN c M '$k b�1t Tai _ _ y • 5 b : r 27. Aa a '° It e. y n' Atitialir Ai AERIAL PHOTO TAKEN 10/15/75 ® LEGEND: PROPERTY BOY NOARr HISTORICALLY RRIGAfED ACREAGC 800 400 0 800 IP A (25% CORN, 25% ALFALFA. 253 PINTO BEANS. 257. AI CAR BEE 5) ISMIIIMMI SCALE IN FEET HISTOWCALLY IRRIGATED LANDS Dare: 03/09/99 M I�O�AII 'p �! � ,�� Job No: 90-239 COLYAwvv F1SNEIUES TY�\� Ieg ,1A�i. WIN : = C.W.m1�41Id4 rn1Y ',g Demon istIB ' TATEYAGAA PRDPERTY r , ,rew cnecl.ea: sm. t)•Rh (!05µ11461Y Fa nits wrr 46!05: R.nen.a DWc !•u90Y�� m M� +w. x11105: I'-900' rights. The surface water was delivered and used to extinction each season, and the wells were needed to provide additional water to meet the crop demand. Early season irrigation would be supplied by the irrigation wells. During the river run, the wells would still be pumped to fully meet the crop requirements. When the river run ended, the landowner ordered reservoir water. The Tateyamas utilized their reservoir shares in such a way that the supply was distributed evenly throughout the remainder of the irrigation season. Again, the wells continued to supply additional water as a supplement to the reservoir water. Late season irrigation water would come from the wells and/or additional reservoir water that was rented. The surface water rights were never sufficient, which is typical for farms with supplemental Poudre Plan wells. Attached in Appendix D is an affidavit signed by the Tateyamas verifying the above information. Because the surface water was used to extinction each season, it is assumed that the farm was water short. To support this claim, the water supply from the surface water rights in an average year and wet year are compared to the crop demand. AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY FROM SURFACE RIGHTS VS CROP DEMAND - Average Year The Tateyamas have owned and farmed the property since 1941. Historically,the farm irrigated approximately 163 of the 200 acres. The four crops grown were alfalfa, sugar beets, corn, and pinto beans. According to the landowner, the crops were rotated evenly on the farm. There were always approximately 40.75 acres of each of the four crops, which makes up the 163 irrigated acres. Figure No. 3 shows the historic acreage. A modified Blaney-Criddle analysis was performed for the farm to determine the potential crop consumptive use. Average temperature and precipitation data was taken from the Greeley UNC station and used as input for this model. Table No. 2 lists the total irrigation requirement of the crops on this farm. The total irrigation requirement is 255.9 acre-feet per year. The average year Blaney-Criddle model can be seen in Appendix E. Table No. 3 and Table No. 4 are the diversion records for the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Canal and Terry Lake (Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company), respectively. The period of record used is 1974-1997. This information was obtained from the Division 1 Office. From this information, the average pro-rated diversions were determined for 4 shares of the Irrigation Company and 4 shares of the Reservoir Company. The 4 shares of Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company yield approximately 68.4 acre-feet annually. The Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company owns Terry Lake and also owns 60 percent of Worster Lake. As can be seen on Table No. 4, Terry Lake delivers approximately 14.3 acre-feet per share. According to the water commissioner, Worster Lake delivers approximately 3.0 acre-feet per share. Consequently, 1 share of Larimer and Weld Reservoir yields 17.3 acre-feet annually and the 4 shares in the Reservoir Company used Page 3 on the Tateyama farm yield a total of approximately 69.2 acre-feet annually(includes Terry and Worster Lake water). Records were not obtained for the Windsor Reservoir and Canal Company even though 2 shares were historically used to irrigate the farm. Based on conversations with the Mr. Shawn Hoff, it is estimated that the 2 shares of Windsor Reservoir and Canal yield approximately the same as the 4 shares of Larimer and Weld Reservoir, approximately 69.0 acre-feet per year. This estimate is high and should be conservative for the purpose of this analysis. Therefore, the total annual water supply from the surface water rights is approximately 206.6 acre-feet. It has been assumed that the ditch seepage and evaporation losses are 10 percent of the total diversions. It has also been assumed that the farm efficiency is 55 percent, resulting in a total overall efficiency of 50 percent. The average annual water supply available to meet the crop consumption is 102.3 acre-feet. Table No. 5 compares the total average water available for crop consumption from the surface water rights to the total crop demand. As can be seen,the water supply available for crop consumption is considerably less than the crop demand. This supports the claim that the farm was always water short, and the Poudre Plan wells were used as a supplemental supply to the surface water rights. AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY FROM SURFACE RIGHTS VS CROP DEMAND - Wet Year The above analysis was performed for a wet year to demonstrate that even in a wet year, the water supply from the surface rights was still insufficient. Using 1983 temperature and precipitation, a new crop demand was determined to be 239.3 acre-feet for the year. Table No. 6 shows this information. In addition, the year 1983 was used to determine the yield of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation shares and the Larimer and Weld Reservoir shares. Again, 3.0 acre-feet was added to the yield of the Larimer and Weld Reservoir share to account for Worster Lake. The 4 shares of the Irrigation Company yielded approximately 103.3 acre-feet in 1983 and the 4 shares in the Reservoir Company'yielded approximately 65.7 acre-feet in 1983. The yield of the 2 shares of Windsor Reservoir and Canal was estimated at 66.0 acre-feet annually, which is equal to the Larimer and Weld Reservoir shares. Assuming a 50 percent overall efficiency as before, the total water available for crop consumption is 116.3 acre-feet annually. Again, the surface water rights were not enough to meet the crop irrigation requirements. This comparison is made on Table No. 7. The 1983 information and the wet year Blaney-Criddle information can be seen in Appendix F. REPLACEMENTS Source of Replacement Because the farm is water short, the consumptive use credit is dependent on the average delivery of the surface water rights and the farm efficiency. Colorado Fisheries acquired Page 4 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company and 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company. The average annual diversions for each company were pro- rated for 1 share. Again, a 10 %ditch loss and a 55 % farm efficiency was used to determine the consumptive use credit from the 2 shares (1 share from each company). The estimated annual consumptive use credit from the 2 shares is 17.0 acre-feet. This information can be seen in Table No. 8. Method of Replacements The 2 shares will be committed to the augmentation of the subject operation and will not be used for irrigation or any other use. The 2 shares will be ordered to the property as historically and diverted at the original farm headgate on the south end of the property. The 2 shares will be pulled from the concrete ditch, measured, and either put in a ditch that flows water back to Lone Tree Creek or into the recharge pond. Figure No. 4 shows the methods of replacement. This project has been presented before the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company Board and they had no problems with the operation. Mr. Dave Nettles has also been to the site and is aware of the subject operation. He also did not see any problems. DRY-UP ACREAGE The total irrigation requirement is 255.9 acre-feet. The irrigated acreage is 163 acres, resulting in an irrigation requirement of 1.57 acre-feet per acre. Since a consumptive use credit of 17.0 acre-feet is claimed, the proportionate dry-up is 10.8 acres. This proposed dry-up will ensure that there is not an expansion of use. RECHARGE SUFFICIENCY A 10-year spreadsheet model was developed to determine if the recharge would be sufficient to offset depletions associated with this operation. Two different scenarios were analyzed to demonstrate the adequacy of recharge for the subject operation: 1) a series of average years and, 2) a series of average years followed by three dry years. Table No. 9 shows recharge for average years of delivery. Column 1 in this table is the average Larimer and Weld diversion for 1 irrigation share and 1 reservoir share. It is still assumed that there is a 10% ditch loss to the farm headgate and the irrigation efficiency is 55%. Consequently, the return flow component is 45% of the farm headgate delivery. Of the return flows, it is assumed that 50%occurs as surface and 50% occurs as subsurface. Column 3 shows the surface return flow requirement, which is 22.5% (0.45*0.50) of the farm headgate delivery. This portion of the farm headgate delivery will be routed immediately back to the river to satisfy the surface return obligation. Thus, 77.5% of the farm headgate delivery will be available for recharge. Due to the fact that the recharge pond is on the property, the subsurface return flows will be maintained. Of the 77.5% being recharged, 22.5%is maintaining subsurface return flow obligations Page 5 and 55% is consumptive use. Column 4 shows the consumptive use portion of the total water recharged. This value is the 55% of the farm headgate delivery. The recharge pond is approximately 3000 feet from Lone Tree Creek. Using the same parameters as in the lagged evaporation model, the timing of the consumptive use portion of the recharge was found. Column 5 in Table No. 9 shows the accretions realized at the stream from the consumptive use recharge at the site. The recharge credits available were compared to the lagged evaporation (from Table No. 1) and an excess/deficit was calculated. This table shows that in a series of average years, the consumptive use portion of the recharge from the 2 shares is sufficient to cover the lagged depletions associated with evaporation. Table No. 10 analyzes the plan if a series of average years was followed by three dry years. For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that the diversions in Years 8, 9, and 10 are 50%of the average annual delivery. In this extreme case, the consumptive use portion of the recharge from the 2 shares was still sufficient to meet the evaporation replacement requirement(from Table No. 1) OPERATION OF PLAN A daily accounting form has been developed to record the actual deliveries from the Eaton Ditch, actual diversions into the recharge pond, and actual returns back to the river to meet surface return flow obligations. This daily accounting form can be seen in Appendix G. The daily measurements will be summed for each month and entered into a monthly accounting spreadsheet. This monthly spreadsheet model can be seen in Appendix H. The consumptive use portion(55%) of the "Actual Colorado Fisheries Headgate Deliveries"will be lagged to determine the recharge credit realized at the stream. This credit will be compared to the lagged evaporation replacement requirement (from Table No. 1) to assure that there is not a deficit in that month. The model currently shows a deficit because no recharge has been done yet. ADJACENT WELLS There are no other wells within 600 feet of the wells and proposed recharge pond. CONCLUSIONS • The wells on the property were constructed to supplement the surface water rights for irrigation and are augmented under the Poudre Plan. • The well water will be routed through the rearing ponds and tailwater pond before being used for irrigation as historically. The only new use will be associated with evaporation. Page 6 • The surface water rights were used to extinction each year. Because the farm is water short, the irrigation efficiency controls the crop consumptive use. A 10% ditch loss and 55% farm efficiency is assumed. • Colorado Fisheries acquired 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company and 1 share of the Larimer and Weld Reservoir Company. Both are being dedicated for augmentation. • A dry-up of approximately 27.2 acres will be included in this plan. • There are no other wells within 600 feet of the wells and proposed recharge pond. Page 7 rnaunt NU.1 Reis W k ,R 4/ I �f 1 N ! 5 ., 4 ellfeo *V f k �''' y k / / \ _ 1 1 a • a i+l . \` WRY/W�'\ svr M v.um..cw ri .v.,n }�A( W : U t 6 / ! tl v0 I rn rn 6! N /j j 1T11 /.1.//' / t• T 7 N �7 =.1 t f4 O��% %i/ q • V '�/ It " /jv ,/ / t \N\N. )///,/ v A.' i �r Js-oat •__ r FIIQHWAYI4\ i • n �.� _sago s Fri l r ,,' —' r j ,. \ `` � r , , 1 2000 1000 0 2000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP Date: 02/08/99 ��A�/� � yl_ AID Job Na: 98-238 COLORADO I� ■u� P'egate,Inc. Drown-. wN Q . pyre a— le rkl! Deei9n: SPN TATUYAMA PROPERTY = eefil,Ow,,lime-,,,,,., Checked'. SPN Ow.6 itI 011)M121 Fa(1111)19-2719 Fie Matey.DWC 41Yq/ete1met Trot SaleYlemallelmp. Scale: I'=2000 riuuht IVu.y IA {a' a�riE. 4- 2‘ 1"2 .f £Pr y 6- -1- �A _ y F P •'LI:tt ,i3[ ,f . ENE CORNER *EC 8, T 7 N, R 65 W � t ,. d . ,' ,lae re b Mx ,6 yyyy** ✓ FC 4 T l • 1/, C U , Ty' vl" r t d ,c bI `X' tl ni gkY y SE dY. x' 'IT 9 'it. yya, 11 b . t yi q"x'`"3 krf c..4,„- u - P ., tw 1 11 Er ' 3 Mir„�y 6 yb ,,p , , .) x5µ.% d ! AA E A . frEl f E' �r i ki• a' �" Yr q, ait y v ¢jr�1"`s"t ° h } g y �w p-tEt vPyy, 4" = " P '; .u^... m �i�ma..eo, c`^M.-k.aen caws...; �,'sy 3 ps# N',¢ ,e-.eSA' �a P m ,`,1",A;,',44,41/2 c l°' YP /4.•,-.;:•';' .t fr I�c7nI 2 , f.l v t E. h � d V' %e EAP. EPEfi A 1 u a x f' s ' k F Y a w ; e`s I, �y } m k e . µ x,us xpY�a> I .rq) k x'•in? )9T'-' '8,1•Y, �Yr i AI 4331.1":1smi G T. �4 yl y X ,h p�F J .Vw, H' {4^ qv� ..yp t wlr�: S 2S A .� F bd��x$ ! N �tR* y T e M3 s -,1„.,"y k,.2, 9 ails a - . �zz44 g 'Et ' A l i sy y Y F y,,q�. 5 r 1 k fLIk&LP ,,a' '"£ i, `y� ' c$ x +T /'f ^yet ' j ° '3 �-;:a-l!"s'd' I, Sib. w AERIAL PHOTO TAKEN 10/15/75 2 LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY HISTORICALLY IRRIGATED ACREAGE 800 400 0 800 V////f� (257 CORN. 23% ALFALFA. 25 PINTO BEANS, 259. SUGAR BEETS) SCALE IN FEET HISTORICALLY IRRNIATCD LANDS Date: 03/08/99 COLORADO FISHERIES ma / O`w Jon Mc 98-439 r wwE TYtf� pp'egate,'� 1414 — ear r9.rtrdarw� D,9 SPN TATVYAMA PROPSRIY i 111•00•0110•••-rs Checked SPN " dwRO nee eehen...Dwc .yee.Y.i 4i .+�.�ws Scaler 1'=B0DE rluunn rms.4 1 ',,_ �s pp=- f`L b t pg. . -I-- 4 NR CORNER SRC 8, sy +.' T7 N, R13SW -� q' ' i'`scV Jkna t :-..�` r ^ N ��Sp�a 9 1 � Sa a `Tk. ;oori YnaIftrirge' r: IRi "*-a s a ..* R YtiY;eiSEr '�. d,... - rte. • 1 rl tPr c. 8r �k� Y f�r i s wit" .Fs4 3„k4. �rnr s.r. x y rs i? ^ 4gI ''''''''''''''''''''''4'''''- ,a�.tf .pr s 3 Yr v '' iiiµ S C�`1.- J y^ ryN i ry4� M'' NdF fi F DV, r iT�Yb r�� M ' ' � �� tad .9—t 224 2"4 1 A 'tx s4;':. ', -.., , , )- 4 ... .." " ' "4.'" 1: '. .:',.1 t 4 c y, s a of i lt� t �r�y d � } Y i t� e: 5t It.� - fi,�Y , I 4 .�+. 1 ys 3 r' .w Y Yr t i ". Yid Irv, .-c' - e°O.: ` , k 'li F31 t !- 3 F11 t R'L a. Aii h y 3. AERIAL F'HCTO TAKEN 6/25/98 - Qi LEGEND: REPLACEMENT DITCHES 800 400 0 800 lill SCALE IN FEET METHOD OF REPLACEMENT Date: 03/08/99 MN No 98-238COLORADO FEMME= TuttlSApplegate,lnc. Omrn: NJH _JsW,��yr�I� N493 SPN TATEYAMA PROPERTY - 'imamsr-rz. clrocMJ'. srN Omar Cs File F.neees Dwc ' I 1•S(31101334119 �yirw`F+++ 4r.+�r1w3. wic I'=9� Table No.-1 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Evaporative Losses Percent of Gross Lake Effective Net Lake Total Lake Lagged Evaporation Month Annual Evaportation Precipitation Precipitation Evaporation Evaporation at Stream Evaporation (ft) (in) (ft) (ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) Jan 3.0% 0.11 0.49 0.03 0.08 0.17 0.44 Feb 3.5% 0.13 0.37 0.02 0.11 0.22 0.41 Mar 5.5% 0.21 1.14 0.07 0.14 0.28 0.39 - Apr 9.0% 0.34 1.68 0.10 0.24 0.48 _ 0.39 May 12.0% 0.45 2.55 0.15 0.30 0.60 0.42 - June 14.5% 0.54 1.94 0.11 0.43 0.86 0.46 - July 15.0% 0.56 1.45 0.08 0.48 0.96 0.52 Aug 13.5% 0.51 1.15 0.07 0.44 0.88 0.58 Sept 10.0% 0.38 1.14 0.07 0.31 0.62 0.61 Oct 7.0% 0.26 0.99 0.06 0.20 0.41 0.59 Nov 4.0% 0.15 0.85 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.54 Dec 3.0% 0.11 0.45 0.03 0.09 0.17 0.49 Total 100% 3.75 14.20 0.83 2.92 5.84 5.84 Exposed Water Surface = 2 acres Annual Preciptiation = 14.20 inches -Taken from Greeley UNC Weather Station Gross Annual Evaporation = I 45 inches -Taken from NOAA Technical Report NWS 33 Table No. -2 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Water Demand Analysis -Average Year Potential Crop Total Consumptive Use in) Effective Precipitation 9n)* Irrigtion Requirement(in) Irrigation Requirement(ac-ft)" Irrigation Req. Month Beans Malta Corn Beets Beans Alfalfa Corn Beets Beans Alfalfa 11 Corn Beets Beans Alfalfa Cam Beets (ac-ft) Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ Apr 0.00 1.17 0.00 1.67 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.43 0.00 2.02 2.44 May 0.97 4.39 1.91 4.06 0.97 1.83 1.60 1.80 0.00 2.55 0.32 2.26 0.00 8.67 1.08 7.66 17.41 Jun 6.21 6.69 4.74 7.11 1.56 1.61 1.44 1.64 4.65 5.09 3.30 5.47 - 15.77 17.28 11.20 18.56 62.82 Jul 7.08 7.89 7.56 8.76 _ 1.24 1.29 1.27 1.36 5.85 6.60 6.30 7.40 19.85 22.41 21.38 25.14 88.77 Aug 3.40 6.64 6.52 6.89 _ 0.78 0.94 0.93 0.95 2.62 5.70 5.59 5.94 8.90 19.37 18.97 20.18 67.41 Sep 0.00 2.97 2.84 1.55 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.74 0.00 2.16 2.05 0.81 _ 0.00 7.35 6.95 2.74 17.03 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 17.66 29.75 23.58 30.43 4.55 7.51 6.03 7.96 13.11 22.23 17.55 22.46 44.52 75.50 59.58 76.29 255.89 Note: * - Based on equation from SCS TR21 "- Irrigation Req. = (Potential Crop C.U. - Effective Precip.)*(Acreage) No. of acres irrigated: Beans = 40.75 acres Alfalfa = 40.75 acres Assumptions: Corn = 40.75 acres Application Depth =3 in Sugar Beets = 40.75 acres Effective precipitation cannot exceed potential crop consumptive use or average monthly rainfall Table No.-3 ilorado Fisheries ateyama Property Larimer Weld Irrigation Canal Div 1 Total Number of Shares= 1419 Dist 3 All diversions in acre-feet Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 1974 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12048.00 17026.00 2475.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31549.00 1975 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12793.00 14769.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27562.00 1976 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14182.00 1307.00 873.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16362.00 1977 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1886.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1886.00 1978 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 167.00 23766.00 6380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30313.00 1979 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11858.00 10416.00 336.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22610.00 1980 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25446.00 3974.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29420.00 1981 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 518.00 7943.00 0.00 302.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8763.00 1982 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3234.00 8795.00 10294.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22323.00 1983 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5390.00 20873.00 9477.00 896.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36636.00 ' 1984 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4907.00 8611.00 3974.00 1087.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18579.00 1985 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10321.00 8120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18441.00 1986 0.00 0.00 0.00 k 0.00 6243.00 16017.00 14215.00 725.00 397.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37 5 1987 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4508.00 4610.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9118.00 1988 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2307.00 24292.00 1898.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28497.00 1989 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3300.00 6617.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9917.00 1990 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4175.00 19206.00 4075.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27456.00 1991 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7956.00 10567.00 527.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19050.00 1992 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11240.00 10034.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21380.00 1993 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10171.00 13664.00 7145.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30980.00 1994 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17931.00 3190.00 353.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21474.00 1995 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2090.00 28035.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30125.00 1996 0.00 0.00 0.00 5534.00 16706.00 16181.00 7692.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46113.00 1997 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18958.00 1156.00 3448.00 6349.00 6692.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36603.00 Avg. 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.58 5612.08 11393.33 5914.83 797.88 332.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 24281.42 irorata 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 3.95 8.03 4.17 0.56 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.11 Table No.-4 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Terry Lake (Water Released to Larimer& Weld Canal) Div 1 Total Number of Shares= 744.0 Dist 3 All diversions in acre-feet Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 1974 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5100.00 4532.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10332.00 1975 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3144.00 3426.00 2388.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8958.00 1976 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2608.00 5308.00 1997.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9913.00 1977 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3429.00 3178.00 1521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8128.00 1978 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3896.00 7630.00 1357.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12883.00 1979 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5709.00 3571.00 2626.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11906.00 1980 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6667.00 5084.00 2065.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13816.00 1981 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3217.00 3730.00 109.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7056.00 1982 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4379.00 6868.00 1990.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13237.00 1983 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2432.00 5177.00 2382.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9991.00 1984 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3308.00 5620.00 2279.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11207.00 1985 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3924.00 5373.00 681.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9978.00 1986 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4238.00 6449.00 831.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11518.00 1987 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4940.00 2245.00 334.00 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 7519.00 1988 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4862.00 4172.00 423.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9457.00 1989 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5438.00 3890.00, 755.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10083.00 1990 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4115.00 5860.00 1306.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11281.00 1991 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4855.00 6433.00 2054.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13342.00 1992 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4245.00 4430.00 2552.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11227.00 1993 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4640.00 5692.00 1447.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11779.00 1994 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4584.00 3688.00 1506.00, 0.00 0.00 0.00 9778.00 1995 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3124.00 7069.00 1837.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12030.00 1996 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3097.00 4724.00 2067.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9888.00 1997 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4241.00 3349.00 2690.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10280.00 Avg. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4174.67 4895.75 1579.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 10649.46 Prorata 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.61 6.58 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.31 Table No. -5 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Water Supply vs Crop Demand -Average Year Average Annual Headgate Average Annual Headgate Average Annual Headgate Diversions Pro-rated Diversions Pro-rated Diversions Pro-rated Total Supply Farm Headgate Water Supply Total Irrigation for 4 Shares of for 4 Shares of for 2 Shares of from All Shares Delivery' Available for Crop Requirement Larimer&Weld Irrigation Larimer&Weld Reservoir Windsor Res. &Canal Consumption" (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) 68.44 69.20 69.00 206.64 185.98 102.29 255.88 ' No diversion records were obtained for the Windsor Reservoir& Canal Company. This value is estimated based on conversations with Mr. Shawn Hoff.. **Assumes a 10% ditch loss to farm headgate ***Assumes a farm efficiency of 55% Table No. -6 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Water Demand Analysis -Wet Year (1983) Potential Crop Total Consumptive Use in) Effective Precipitation Jin)* Imgption Requirement(in) Irrigation Requirement(ac-ft)** Irrigation Month Beans Alfalfa Corn Beets Beans Alfalfa I{ Com Beets Beans Alfalfa Corn Beets Beans Alfalfa Corn Beets (Req' Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Apr 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 May 0.00 2.98 0.59 3.24 0.00 2.98 0.59 3.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Jun 3.90 5.75 3.17 6.11 2.44 2.70 2.34 2.76 1.46 3.05 0.83 3.35 4.96 10.36 2.82 11.37 29.51 Jul 7.87 7.84 6.94 8.70 1.62 1.61 1.53 1.69 6.25 6.23 5.41 7.01 21.23 21.16 18.37 23.80 84.56 Aug 5.33 7.47 7.57 7.75 0.38 0.43 0.44 0.44 4.94 7.04 7.13 7.31 16.79 23.91 24.21 24.84 89.75 Sep 1.07 3.20 4.28 1.68 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.94 3.06 4.13 1.55 3.20 10.39 14.02 5.27 32.89 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 2.07 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 18.17 27.24 23.20 28.95 4.56 7.86 5.09 9.57 13.60 19.38 18.11 19.37 46.19 65.81 61.50 65.79 239.29 Note: * - Based on equation from SCS TR21 **- lrriaation Req. = (Potential Crop C.U. - Effective Precip.)`(Acreage) No. of acres irrigated: Beans = 40.75 acres Alfalfa = 40.75 acres Assumptions: Corn = 40.75 acres Application Depth =3 in Sugar Beets = 40.75 acres Effective precipitation cannot exceed potential crop consumptive use or average monthly rainfall Table No. -7 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Water Supply vs Crop Demand -Wet Year (1983) Wet Year Headgate Wet Year Headgate Wet Year Headgate Diversions Pro-rated Diversions Pro-rated Diversions Pro-rated Total Supply Farm Headgate Water Supply Total Irrigation for 4 Shares of for 4 Shares of for 2 Shares of from Al Shares Delivery** Available for Crop Requirement Larimer&Weld Irrigation Larimer&Weld Reservoir Windsor Res.&Canal Consumption "" (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ao-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) 103.27 65.71 I 66.00 234.98 211.48 116.32 239.20 No diversion records were obtained for the Windsor Reservoir&Canal Company. This wet year value is estimated. **Assumes a 10% ditch loss to farm headgate ***Assumes a farm efficiency of 55% Table No. -8 Colorado Fisheries Tateyama Property Consumptive Use Credit Average Headgate Average Headgate Total Average Consumptive Diversions Pro-rated Diversions Pro-rated Headgate Diversion Farm Use Month for 1 Share of for 1 Share of Pro-rated for Headgate Credit for Larimer&Weld Irrigation Larimer&Weld Reservoir 2 Shares* Delivery*k 2 Shares*** (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Apr 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.14 0.08 May 3.95 0.00 3.95 3.56 1.96_ Jun 8.03 0.00 8.03 7.23 3.97 Jul 4.17 6.61 10.78 9.70 5.34 Aug 0.56 7.58 8.14 7.33 4.03 Sep 0.23 3.12 3.35 3.02 1.66 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 17.10 17.31 34.41 30.97 17.03_ Note: *2 Shares = 1 share in Larimer&Weld Irrigation and 1 share in Larimer&Weld Reservoir **Assumes a 10%ditch loss to farm headgate ***Assumes a farm efficiency of 55% Table No.9 Colorado Fisheries Ditch loss to farm headgate= 10% Tateyama Property %of Average Year Diversion for Year e= 100% %of Average Year Diversion for Year 9= 100% Operating Plan %of Average Year Diversion for Year 10= 100% Farm Volume of Consumptive Use Lagged River Headgate Surface Return Consumptive Use Recharge Evaporation .Excess/ Month Diversions Deliveries Flow Obligation Recharge at Stream Requirement Deficit (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feat) (acre-feat) (acre-feet) (9. (2) (3) (4) , _. ..G .. _'61,-_ . (6) (7) Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0O0 1.18 0.44 0.74 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.39 0.55 __ Apr 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.86 0.39 0.47 _ May 3.95 3.56 0.80 1.96 0.85 0.42 0.43 Year 7 Jun 8.03 7.23 1.63 3.97 1.12 0.46 0.66 _ Jul 10.78 9.70 2.18 5.34 1.62 0.52 1.09 Aug 8.14 7.33 1.65 4O3 2.12 0.58 1.54 _ Sep 3.35 3.02 0.68 1.86 2.27 0.61 1.66 _ Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.59 1.43 _ Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.54 1.09 _ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.49 0.87 _ Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.44 0.74 _ Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,95 0.39 0.55 Apr 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.86 0.39 0.47 _ May 3.95 3.56 0.80 1.96 0.85 0.42 0.43 Year 8 Jun 8.03 7.23 1.63 3.97 1.12 0.46 0.66 _ Jul 10.78 9.70 2.18 5.34 1.62 0.52 1.09 Aug 8.14 7.33 1.65 4.03 2.12 0.58 1.54 Sep 3.35 3.02 0.68 1.66 2.27 0.61 1.66 _ Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.59 1.43 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.54 1.09 _ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.49 0.87 _ Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.44 0.74 _ Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.39 0.55 _ Apr 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.86 0.39 0.47 _ May 3.95 3.56 0.80 1.96 0.65 0.42 0.43 _ Year 9 Jun 8.03 7.23 1.63 3.97 1.12 0.46 0.66 _ Jul 10.78 9.70 2.18 5.34 1.62 0.52 1.09 _ Aug 8.14 7.33 1.65 4.03 2.12 0.58 1.54 _ Sep 3.35 3.02 0.68 1.66 2.27 0.61 1.66 _ Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.59 1.43 _ Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.54 1.09 _ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.49 0.87 _ Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.44 0.74 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64 _ Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.39 0.55 Apr 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.86 0.39 0.47 _ May 3.95 3.56 0.80 1.96 0.85 0.42 0.43 Year 10 Jun 8.03 7.23 1.63 3.97 1.12 0.46 0.66 Jul 10.78 9.70 2.18 5.34 1.62 0.52 1.09 Aug 8.14 7.33 1.65 4.03 2.12 0.58 1.54 Sep 3.35 3.02 0.68 1.66 2.27 0.61 1.66 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.59 1.43 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.54 1.09 Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.49 0.87 _. Column Legend (1)Average Ladner and Weld diversion;1 share irrigation and 1 share reservoir,Year 8,9,and 10 are percent of average diversion (2)Assumes a 10%ditch loss to farm headgate (3)Surface Return Flow Obligations are 22.5%of farm headgate delivery[Column(2)*45%'50%] (4)55%of farm headgate delivery (5)Recharge credit at stream;lagged consumptive use portion of the recharge (6)Taken from Table No.1 (7)Column 5-Column 6 Table No.10 Colorado Fisheries Ditch loss to farm headgate= 10% Tateyama Property %of Average Year Diversion for Year 8= 50% %of Average Year Diversion for Year 9= 50% Operating Plan %of Average Year Diversion for Year 10= 50% Farm Volume of Consumptive Use Lagged River Headgete Surface Return Consumptive Use Recharge Evaporation Excess/ Month Diversions Deliveries Flow Obligation Recharge at Stream Requirement Deficit (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 41) (2) (3) (4) (5) (8i (7) Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.44 0.74 .m Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.39 0,55_ Apr 0.16 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.86 0.39 0.47 May 3.95 3.56 0.80 1.96 0.85 0.42 0.43 Year 7 Jun 8.03 7.23 1.63 3.97 1.12 0.46 0.66 Jul 10.78 9.70 2.18 5.34 1.62 0.52 1.09_ Aug 8.14 7.33 1.65 4.03 2.12 0.58 1.54_ Sep 3.35 3.02 0.68 1.66 2.27 0.61 1.66 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.59 1.43 Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.54 1.09_ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.49 0.87 Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.44 0.74 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.41 0.64_ Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.39 0.55_ Apr 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.86 0.39 0.47 May 1.98 1.78 0.40 0.98 0.82 0.42 0.40_ Year 8 Jun 4.02 3.61 0.81 1.99 0.92 0.46 0.46 Jul 5.39 4.85 1.09 2.67 1.14 0.52 0.61 Aug 4.07 3.66 0.82 2.01 1.36 0.58 0.78 _ Sep 1.68 1.51 0.34 0.83 1.41 0.61 0.80 Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.59 0.67 _ Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.54 0.50 _ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.49 0.40 Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.44 0.34 Feb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.41 0.29 _ Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.39 0.24 Apr 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.58 0.39 I 0.18 May 1.98 1.78 0.40 0.98 0.56 0.42 0.14 _ Year CI Jun 4.02 3.61 0.81 1.99 0.68 0.46 0.22 _ Jul 5.39 4.85 1.09 2.67 0.92 t 0.52 0.40 Aug 4.07 3.66 0.82 2.01 1.16 0.58 0.58 _ Sep 1.68 1.51 0.34 0.83 1.23 0.61 0.62 _ Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.59 0.51 _ Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.54 0.35 _ Dec 0.00 j 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.49 0.26 Jan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.44 ~0.22 Feb 0.00 0.00 f 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.41 0.18 Mar 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.39 0.14 Apr 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.04 0,48 0.39 0.09 May 1.98 1.78 0.40 0.98 0.47 0.42 0.05 Year 10 Jun 4.02 3.61 0.81 1.99 0.60 0.46 0.14 _ Jul 5.39 4.85 1.09 2.67 0.85 0.52 0.32 _ Aug 4.07 3.66 0.82 2.01 1.10 0.58 0.51 _ Sep 1.68 1.51 0.34 0.83 1.17 0.61 0.56 _ Oct 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.59 0.45 _ Nov 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.54 0.30 _ Dec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.49 0.22 Column Legend (1)Average Larimer and Weld diversion;1 share irrigation and 1 share reservoir;Year 8.9.and 10 are percent of average diversion (2)Assumes a 10%ditch loss to farm headgate (3)Surface Return Flow Obligations are 22.5%of farm headgate delivery(Column(2)'45%*50%) (4)55%of farm headgate delivery (5)Recharge credit at stream;lagged consumptive use portion of the recharge (8)Taken from Table No.1 (7)Column 5-Column 6 APPENDIX A Copy of Well Permit Applications COLORADO DIVISION OF V 'ER RESOURCES See Attached SSP DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST.,RM.818,DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Please note:other forms are available for specific uses including-residential,livestock,monitoring/obaerv., gravel pits,registration of old wells) Review instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black ink or typed 1. APPUCANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed description) Theme et aadaad 0 INDUSTRIAL OTHER: Evaporation associates Jerry & Jeannie Bess 0 COMMERCIAL w/ fish hatchery ponds c/o Tuttle Applegate, Inc. 0 MUNICIPAL Weir,Address 0 IRRIGATION 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 ❑ FEED LOT-number of head: 7.WELL DATA City Mute DP Code Neiman pinging rote Menu aaomt 150 gpm 242 acre-feet Denver, CO 80233-1136 Tad eapte Aquifer Tabphan comber Endues am coon 16 feet Alluvium (303)452-6611 , 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2. TYPE OF APPUCATION (check applicable box(es)) A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided w an attachment): Portions of the Eh of Sec. 8, T 7N, O Construct new well IN Use existing well R 65W, 6th P.M. O Replace existing well 6 Change or Increase Use ❑ Change (source) Aquifer 0 Reapplication le Aired permit) (See attached map) O Other: (If used for crop irrigation,attach fried map that shows litigated area.) 3. REFER TO (if applicable): B. A sores C. Owns' Water court cast Permit 200 Tateyama/.Bess 11550-R D. LMt any other wale or water rights used on thle land: Emergency Verbal i Monitoring hole acknowledgment t See attached SWSP -VE- MH- - WO name or t 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER(optional) raw Done number 4. LOCATION OF WELL County Quarter/quarter Quarter 10. SIGNATURE of applicantls) or authorized agent Weld NW 34 SE 34 The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury Section TowMip Nor a Ranpa E or W PrrwI-I'MSS in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis- 8 7 B ❑ 65 ❑ al 6th demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13HW. I have read Distance of well from section mss the statements herein, know the contents thereof, and state 1953 ft from❑ N® a 2097 ft from Si E❑ w that they are true to my knowledge. wee baton chow.le Mene t from aflame anon M wt' ) are!signature '/�) \�C L � l 1C, Title Data Per rpl.am ent era only-cane.o and d,eoden from ale wd III now w+ VOwner 3/11/99 feet direction OPTIONAL INFORMATION 5.TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED WOO map name MWR map no. Surface rev. A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided ea an attacMwntl: Office Use Only See Attached Map DIV CO B. STATE PARCEL IDS lopdondl: WI) c.a awes In no D. Owner 200 Tateyama/ Bess BA E. Will this be the only well on this tract? 0 YES 0 NO (if other wells are on this tract, re detailed inst.) USE(S) _ _ MD Form GWS-45 (12/95) COLORADO DIVISION OF W0 TER RESOURCES See Attached SSP DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL_ .ESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST.,RM. 818,DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (303) 866-3687 main: (303)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Please note:other fortes are available for specific uses including-residential,livestock,monitoring/obeerv.,gravel pits,rsyistrasion of old walls) Review instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black irk or typed 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed description) Name el SUS 0 INDUSTRIAL (J OTHER:Evaporation associated Jerry E, Jeannie Bess O COMMERCIAL w/ fish hatchery ponds c/o Tuttle Applegate, Inc. ❑ MUNICIPAL Yana MSG G 0 IRRIGATION 0 FEED LOT-number of had : 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 7.WELL DATA on State W Coda Meals WPM'we I Mar anous 150 gpm 242 acre-feet Denver, CO 80233-1136 Tas Spa Mdfe Telephone sew PISS arm ea 17 feet Alluvium (303) 452-6611 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable hoxles)) A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be Provided w an emedenentl: Portions of the Eli of Sec. 8, T 7N, O Construct new well W Use existing well R 65W, 6th P.M. ❑ Replace existing well 0 Change or Increase Use (See attched map) O Change (source) Aquifer D Reapplication iwoksd permit) O Other: lit used for crop irrigation, attach scaled map that shows inlesed ama.) 3. REFER TO (if applicable): S. a scree 'rem 200 Tateyama/ Bess Wow court caw a Ramat a 11551-R D. List say other web or weer rights used en thin land: Emergency verbal s Monitodno hole acknowledgments See attached SWSP -VE- MH- - Wd nen ors 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER(optional) Ns Uwe mamba 4. LOCATION OF WELL County Quarter/wooer Quarter 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent Weld NW y, SE y, The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury section Township N or s Range E er W PrMpe Mnham In the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis- 8 7 El D 65 D ® 6th demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13)1a). I have read Distance of well hem action Ines the statements herein, know the contents thereof,and state 1868Fthsm 0 N EI $ 2150 ft ton O E D w they are)rue to my knowledge. WM Seen ebbs.If Mere few apple.arias N aeabwel Met atrue Sa s '1- Tau Oa. For aeletel eve eau rep-sarr ad Nolan trwm w wales w Owner 3/11/99 feet direction OPTIONAL INFORMATION 5.TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED uses ft..num DWI map n Suds S. A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided es an attachment): See attached map Office Use Only DIV CO B. STATE PARCEL IDs Iopueasll: WD c.a sass b user D. Oar 200 Tateyama/ Bess BA E. Will this be the only wall on this tract? MD 0 YES 13 NO (if other wells are on this tract,see detailed inst.) USE(S) Form GWS-45 (12/95) COLORADO DIVISION OF W'—ER RESOURCES See attached SSP DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL ..LSOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST.,RM. 818,DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Plane note:other forms ere available for specific uses including-residential,livestock, monitoring/observ., gravel pits,yegisoedwr of old wells) Review instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black Mk or typed 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL (please attach Steed description) Nnrser seldleent 0 INDUSTRIAL b OTHER:Evaporation associated Jerry $ Jeannie Bess 0 COMMERCIAL w/ fish hatchery ponds c/o Tuttle Applegate, Inc. ❑ MUNICIPAL ua,Address 0 IRRIGATION 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 CI FEED LOT—slurring at hod r hs 7.WELL DATA city eve. np Cod. Menss a..ebrs as. 1 Amid en.nn Denver, CO 80233-1136 150 sem 242 sore-feet two depth Mures Tolopher,number 5nySs ores cede) 24 feet Alluvium (303) 452-6611 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2.TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable box(esll A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided as an attachment): Portions of the Ede of Sec. 8, T 7N, ❑ Construct new well 0 Use existing well R 65 IV, 6th P.M. ❑ Replace existing well l@ Change or Increase Use ❑ Change (source) Aquifer 0 Reapplication (embed permit) (See attached p ❑ Other: Of used for crop inisatlnn, attach scald mats that shows Mesta eras., -~ 3. REFER TO Of applicable): B. florae C. Owner water court n..If Permit I 200 Tateyama/ Bess 11546-R D. Lost any other wale or water debts used on Ilia lead: Eminency verbal it Monitoring hole eeknowldgment I See attached SWSP -VE- MH- - Wed m" i r 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER(optional) w„a twit.rwrrr 4. LOCATION OF WELL Cowry on.rtstIwater overt ' 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent Weld NW 4 SE yt The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury leaden Twrrdrlp N or s Range Ear W Abt*.Median in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 nits- 8 7 ® ❑ 65 ❑ ® 6th demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(131(a). I have read Distance of well from motion rots the statements herein, know the contents thereof,and state 1707 ft from❑N 0 a 2238 t from cc E 4y w that y are true to my knowledge. wet leoaden seal.It rat from.Moan ands if*Sol Mott be signature t., . .� J o >� _, The Den for r.ah.mr.t lads war-aabn enal daoem anrn de wd in dew we Owner 3/11/99 feet direction OPTIONAL INFORMATION 5.TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED mama maw aAnnrwne. Sudan Nev. A. LEGAL DESORPTION(may be provided as an art dune nt): Office Use Only DI'V See attached map CO B. STATE PARCEL IDS aptiowi: WC) c..ass in neat D. Ova 200 Tateyama/ Bess BA E. Will this be the only well on this tract? 0 YES a NO (if other wells are on this tract, see detailed inst.) USE(S) MD Form GWS-45(12/95) COLORADO DIVISION OF V 'ER RESOURCES See attached SSP DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST.,RM. 818,DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (3O3) 866-3587 main: (3O3)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Please note:outer forms are eveiiebie for spewing uses including-re'sid'ential,(ive ruskk, alum n^y/.,.e. L,gravel pits,'wants,a sidIi) Review instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black ink or typed 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed description) Name of aFplerrt 0 INDUSTRIAL ® OTHER: Evaporation associatec. Jerry F, Jeannie Bess 0 COMMERCIAL with fish hatchery ponds c/o Tuttle Applegate, Inc. 0 MUNICIPAL Melling Address ❑ IRRIGATION 0 FEED LOT—number of head 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 7.WELL DATA CM sue 9p Code Madmen primping vets Annual emotes Denver, CO 80233-1136 150 gpm 242 acre-feet Tout death nn Aquifer Telephone number(include wee eadel 24 feet Alluvium (303)452-6611 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable bodes)) A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided as an attachment): CI Construct new well ® Use existing well Portions of the E? of Sec. 8, T 7N, R 65W, 6th P.M. ❑ Replace existing well ® Change or Increase Use ❑ Change (source) Aquifer O Reapplication (expired permit) (See attached map) ❑ Other: Id used for crop irrigation, attach scaled map that thews irrigated area.) 3. REFER TO (if applicable): s it Barn c. Owner Weser court ease f Permit f 200 Tateyama/ Bess 11548-R D. List any other wags or water tights awed en Seised: Emergency Verbal S Monitoring hole acknowledgment f -VE- MH- See attached SWSP Well name or f 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER(optional) Name lbaee,umber 4. LOCATION OF WELL County Quarter/quarter Quarter 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent Weld NW % SE % The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury Section TowreNp N or Range E or w Prkebel Meddle in the second degree, which is punishable as a lass 1 mis- 8 7 (J 0 65 0 tg 6th demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104('I31(a). I have read Distance of well from section Ines the statements herein, know the contents thereof,and state 1457 n from❑ N D a 2396 ft from Ci E❑ w that they are true to my knowledge. Wr leestion address.It Afferent from emikeint address N epal..M.l Must be,1 Vstgrw wnso.e `.1a/'� TNN v vi \ (—\i�+�i' Dee Far m,(.can.rnws ear-canna end Ameba from e w o am s now well Owner 3/11/99 feet direction OPTIONAL INFORMATION _ 5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED uses moo roma DWR mop re. eefamdw_ A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided as an attachment): Office Use Only See attached map DIV CO B. STATE PARCEL IDS(optional): WI) C.a sg a i!r toot D. Oe rr . LUIJ Tateyama/ Bess BA E. Will this be the only well on this tract? ❑ YES al NO (if other wells are on this tract,see detailed inst.) USE(S) MD Form GWS-45 (12/95) COLORADO DIVISION OF V 'ER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES See attached. SSP 1313 SHERMAN ST.,RM. 818,DENVER CO 80203 phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: 13O3)866-3581 GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application (Please note:other forms are available for specific uses including-residential,livestock,monitoring/observ., gravel pits,registration of old wells) Review Instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black ink or typed 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION 6. USE OF WELL please attach detailed description) None s ssptisen O INDUSTRIAL fi OTHER: Jerry $ Jeannie Bess a COMMERCIAL hvhatcheiyn associated c/o Tuttle Applegate, Inc. with fish hatchery ponds ❑ MUNICIPAL Staffing Address O IRRIGATION 11990 Grant Street, Suite 304 ❑ FEED LOT—number of head : 7. WELL DATA City State Zip Code MSWnwn soaping rate Annual renown Denver, CO 80233-1136 150 gpm 242 acre-feet Total doe, Aqaba Telephone,ember limeade wee*ode) 24 feet Alluvium (303) 452-6611 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable hordes)) A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION'may be provided as an attachment): Portions of the F? of Sec. 8, 1 7N, ❑ Construct new well O Use existing well R 6SW, 6th P.M. O Replace existing well O Change or Increase Use (See attached map) O Change (source) Aquifer O Reapplication 'expired permit) O Other: Ilf used for crop irrigation,attach scaled map that shows irrigated area.) 3. REFER TO (it applicable): I. *awes C. Owner Water court case t Permit e 200 Tateyama/ Bess 11547-R D. List any other wale or water tights used on Oils land: Emergency Verbal I Monitoring hole acknowledgment t See attached SWSP -VE- MH- - Well name ore 9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER(optional) Nan. Vane rifler 4. LOCATION OF WELL County Quarter/quarter Quarter 10. SIGNATURE of applicantls) or authorized agent Weld _NW% SE % The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury Section Township Nor* Range E or W Prkssipsl Meridian in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis- 8 7 at ❑ 65 O IS 6th demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13)(a). I have read Distance of wag from section lines the statements herein, know the contents thereof, and state 1330 s tram❑ N ES s 2465ft from M E❑ w that Tire true to my knowledge. via leaden adios.If tiff .,t horn weaoert address N eepaoablel that be 4.r Sgnwe k Yir,� ("<Tlb Date For replwerem wells only-aabrw end section from aid well b new wag Owner I 3/11/99 feet direction OPTIONAL INFORMATION 5-TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED SODS map Ae * I DWR map no. I surface elev. A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION(may be provided as an attachment): Office Use Only See attached map DIV CO B. STATE PARCEL IDt lopilonall: WI) C.a ease In Met D. On 200 Tateyama/ Bess BA E. Will this be the only well on this tract? O YES ® NO (if other wells are on this tract, see detailed inst.) USE(S) MD Form GWS-45 (12/95) KT i yyakd 1 } § x` yF (S.'4 �t : ,'NE CORNER SEC 8, ' T7 N, R'. 8SW ` , ,, .i r ti I ."1-^t 'n` S 54•i lIP� 9{ , ae F It er' i�} -, q} r. a J :..t rVA } --,.4 . : t4 ` 4P 'fi ,Ka4 L { f 34.1,9, k f _ Sr,_0 f !rte c d xL+�' KT m14, nh s � .,,4„, t k �� t k L d t 1 �i � "3 r . `2"}` ° St ^ 44 s # A� - a 4 wrk p•ry fi Fka s1 t • 7 f 3A 4 a `c�W\'• dkf c. r "...9y� d SA'u.:1„, F5 a tv .e x""s < �2.� s - $ .rk c }� Nt'1 + - z`-NS'f� .u ' ik ;,,e f .iw xa a1"f' } i,1k ass F 'h � A ,gs it + , y'lyi .}fit i �kFk ir. y� it `'£ f lzk aa4 YRib T?4 3 'P14' h4. qy{$' gyp X< d 1 ', 44 P ( ! > i sea yq� AERIAL 'HOTO TAKEN 6/25/98 IC ) - LEGEND: PROPEFTY BOUNDARY (APPROX- 200 cc) 800 400 0 800 moop — SCALE IN FEET �L�R��nON MAP Odle: 03/08/99 Job N. 99-238 COLORADO FISHERIESa....0 _ Tuttl•Applegate,lnc. Drawnlux L — o.r..ru.a,rd.rwr Name $'N TAIZ�IYMr PROPERTY _ l,�a....-..... .a Syr.. nr.eMES134611 Art w.+`.�.w same. r=eao' _ APPENDIX B USGS Pump Test and Temperature/Precipitation for Greeley UNC EXHIBIT 4 County Weld Loc. No. B7-65-8bbb2 0 Area Platte River basin, Lone Tree Creek valley Date July 30, 1958 Aquifer Valley-fill deposits Q 260gpm Depth 26.4 ft Pretest water level 8. 25 ft in IBft One-day specific capacity 46gpmper ft • - - T 80,000 gpd per ft p 4400gpd per sq ft I I T 2 p- - 2 2 H Remarks Water level in a well 293 ft north was lowered w • w I 0.24 ft during pumping of this well z z 3 _ _ 3 O 0 3 acc • C 0 4 . 5 6 \� 0.1 I 10 100 1000 10,000 W w TIME , IN MINUTES I n = Mg WM al ! ! M# ! ! ! ! ! ! ,! III a I i.„„IiiN Monthly Climatic Data for GREELEY UNC for years 1967 - 1996 Station - 53553 Latitude - 4025 Longitude - 10442 Elevation - 4650 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Monthly mean temperature. Ave 27.3 33.0 40.7 49.1 58.1 68.0 73.1 71.3 62.4 50.6 37.1 28. 6 50. 0 Max 33.7 39.8 47.1 54.9 62.9 73.1 76.0 75.5 66.7 55.2 43.1 38.5 52. 4 Year 1981 1992 1986 1981 1974 1977 1980 1995 1990+ 1973 1981 1980 1977 Min 15.9 21.5 34.6 42.5 51.7 62.6 69.8 67.5 58.1 41.7 27.3 16.2 47.5 Year 1979 1989 1969 1983 1995 1967 1992 1967 1971 1969 1985 1983 1985 Count 29 29 30 '30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 28 Monthly mean maximum temperature. Ave 40.5 46. 6 54.9 63.7 72.3 83.2 88. 6 86.8 78.5 66. 1 50.1 41.5 64 .4 Max 48 .8 57.2 63.6 70.6 79.3 89.6 92.0 91.7 85.1 72.9 58.3 53.9 68 .2 Year 1981 1970 1972 1981 1974 1977 1980 1995 1977 1975 1981 1980 1977 Min 27.1 33.0 47.4 54 .9 61.0 75.9 83.9 82.0 72.4 53.7 38 .7 26.3 60.9 Year 1979 1989 1980 1984+ 1995 1967 1992 1992 1985 1969 1985 1983 1993 Count 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 . 30 30 30 29 28 Monthly mean minimum temperature. Ave 14.1 19.4 26.4 34.5 43.9 52.7 57.6 55.6 46.2 35.0 24.0 15.7 35.5 Max 20.0 27.1 30.9 39.5 47.4 56.7 60.0 59.5 51.6 38.8 28.5 23.0 37.5 Year 1994 1992 1992 1992 1994 1994+ 1980 1983 1990 1973 1995 1980 1994 Min 4.6 9.9 20.2 27.4 39.8 49.1 55.7 50.7 42.0 29.7 15.8 6.0 33. 1 Year 1979 1989 1969 1968 1968 1982 1992 1967 1971 1969 1985 1983 1985 Count 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 28 Total monthly precipitation. Ave 0.50 0.38 1.17 1.69 2.58 1.93 1.42 1.09 1.15 0.95 0.87 0.47 14.08 Max 1.44 1.52 4.13 3.41 5.36 4.00 3.41 3.89 3.36 4.46 2.29 1.11 22. 17 Year 1980 1987 1990 1983 1981 1995 1989 1979 1971 1969 1983 1979 1979 Mir. 0.02 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.10 0.21 0.28 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 8.44 Year 1975 1991+ 1978 1982 1974 1990 1972 1973 1992+ 1988 1989+ 1996+ 1968 Count 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 28 http://ulysses.atmos.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mlydb.pl 6/22/98 APPENDIX C Stream Depletion Model for Evaporation EXHIBIT Stream Depletion Analysis Colorado Fisheries 3/4/99 Lagged Evaporation Lakes Distance from stream= 3000 ft Transmissivity= 80000 gpd/ft Specific Yield= 0.2 No-flow Boundary= 6700 ft Consumed Cumulative Cumulative Volume of Volume of Cumulative Volume Volume Volume of Depletion Stream Time Month Pumped Pumped Depletion This Step Depletions (months) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-D) (ac-ft) (moil) 1 Jan-99 0.17 0.168 0.005 0.0050 2 Feb-99 0.22 0.387 0.035 0.0304 3 Mar-99 0.28 0.667 0.095 0.0596 4 Apr-99 0.48 1.146 0.189 0.0943 5 May-99 0.60 1.748 0.338 0.1486 Year I 6 Jun-99 0.86 2.609 0.553 0.2149 7 Jul-99 0.96 3.565 0.853 0.3002 2.80 8 Aug-99 0.88 4.444 1.231 0.3776 9 Sep-99 0.62 5.061 1.652 0.4211 10 Oct-99 0.41 5.470 2.070 0.4183 II Nov-99 0.20 5.671 2.457 0.3872 12 Dec-99 0.17 5.843 2.799 0.3423 13 Jan-2000 0.17 6.011 3.108 0.3085 14 Feb-2000 0.22 6.231 3.396 0.2882 15 Mar-2000 0.28 6.510 3.679 0.2827 16 Apr-2000 0.48 6.989 3.971 0.2924 17 May-2000 0.60 7.592 4.298 0.3271 Year2 18 Jun-2000 0.86 8.453 4.675 0.3769 19 Jul-2000 0.96 9.409 5.123 0.4478 4.84 20 Aug-2000 0.88 10.287 5.635 0.5124 21 Sep-2000 0.62 10.904 6.179 0.5442 22 Oct-2000 0.41 11.313 6.710 0.5309 23 Nov-2000 0.20 11.514 7.200 0.4901 24 Dec-2000 0.17 11.687 7.637 0.4364 25 Jan-2001 0.17 11.855 8.031 0.3945 26 Feb-2001 0.22 12.074 8.398 0.3669 27 Mar-2001 0.28 12.353 8.753 0.3546 28 Apr-2001 0.48 12.832 9.111 0.3582 29 May-2001 0.60 13.435 9.498 0.3872 Year 3 30 Jun-2001 0.86 14.296 9.930 0.4319 31 Jul-2001 0.96 15.252 10.428 0.4981 5.50 32 Aug-2001 0.88 16.130 10.987 0.5584 33 Sep-2001 0.62 16.747 11.573 0.5863 34 Oct-2001 0.41 17.157 12.142 0.5693 35 Nov-2001 0.20 17.358 12.667 0.5253 36 Dec-2001 0.17 17.530 13.136 0.4686 Consumed Cumulative Cumulative Volume of Volume of Cumulative Volume Volume Volume of Depletion Stream Time Month Pumped Pumped Depletion This Step Depletions (months) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) _jac-(g 37 Jan-2002 0.17 17.698 13.560 0.4240 38 Feb-2002 0.22 17.917 13.954 0.3938 39 Mar-2002 0.28 18.197 14.333 0.3792 40 Apr-2002 0.48 18.676 14.714 0.3807 41 May-2002 0.60 19.278 15.121 0.4078 Year 4 42 Jun-2002 0.86 20.139 15.572 0.4507 43 Jul-2002 0.96 21.095 16.088 0.5153 5.73 44 Aug-2002 0.88 21.974 16.662 0.5741 45 Sep-2002 0.62 22.591 17.262 0.6007 46 Oct-2002 0.41 23.000 17.845 0.5825 47 Nov-2002 0.20 23.201 18.382 0.5373 48 Dec-2002 0.17 23.373 18.862 0.4796 49 Jan-2003 0.17 23.541 19.296 0.4340 50 Feb-2003 0.22 23.761 19.699 0.4030 51 Mar-2003 0.28 24.040 20.086 0.3876 52 Apr-2003 0.48 24.519 20.475 0.3884 53 May-2003 0.60 25.122 20.890 0.4149 Year 5 54 Jun-2003 0.86 25.983 21.347 0.4572 55 Jul-2003 0.96 26.939 21.868 0.5212 5.80 56 Aug-2003 0.88 27.817 22.447 0.5795 57 Sep-2003 0.62 28.434 23.053 0.6056 58 Oct-2003 0.41 28.843 23.640 0.5870 59 Nov-2003 0.20 29.044 24.181 0.5414 60 Dec-2003 0.17 29.217 24.665 0.4833 61 Jan-2004 0.17 29.385 25.102 0.4375 62 Feb-2004 0.22 29.604 25.508 0.4062 63 Mar-2004 0.28 29.883 25.899 0.3905 64 Apr-2004 0.48 30.362 26.290 0.3910 65 May-2004 0.60 30.965 26.707 0.4173 Year6 66 Jun-2004 0.86 31.826 27.167 0.4594 67 Jul-2004 0.96 32.782 27.690 0.5232 5.83 68 Aug-2004 0.88 33.660 28.271 0.5813 69 Sep-2004 0.62 34.277 28.878 0.6073 70 Oct-2004 0.41 34.687 29.467 0.5885 71 Nov-2004 0.20 34.888 30.010 0.5429 72 Dec-2004 0.17 35.060 30.494 0.4846 73 Jan-2005 0.17 35.228 30.933 0.4386 74 Feb-2005 0.22 35.447 31.340 0.4072 75 Mar-2005 0.28 35.727 31.732 0.3915 76 Apr-2005 0.48 36.206 32.124 0.3919 77 May-2005 0.60 36.808 32.542 0.4181 Year7 78 Jun-2005 0.86 37.669 33.002 0.4601 79 Jul-2005 0.96 38.625 33.526 0.5239 5.84 80 Aug-2005 0.88 39.504 34.108 0.5820 81 Sep-2005 0.62 40.121 34.715 0.6078 82 Oct-2005 0.41 40.530 35.305 0.5891 83 Nov-2005 0.20 40.731 35.848 0.5433 84 Dec-2005 0.17 40.903 36.333 0.4851 Consumed Cumulative Cumulative Volume of Volume of Cumulative Volume Volume Volume of Depletion Stream Time Month Pumped Pumped Depletion This Step Depletions (mouths (ae-� (ac-ft) (ac11 ..Sac-ft) ac-ft 85 Jan-2006 0.17 41.071 36.772 0.4390 86 Feb-2006 0.22 41.291 37.180 0.4076 87 Mar-2006 0.28 41.570 37.571 0.3918 88 Apr-2006 0.48 42.049 37.964 0.3922 89 May-2006 0.60 42.652 38.382 0.4184 Year 8 90 Jun-2006 0.86 43.513 38.842 0.4604 91 Jul-2006 0.96 44.469 39.367 0.5241 5.84 92 Aug-2006 0.88 45.347 39.949 0.5822 93 Sep-2006 0.62 45.964 40.557 0.6080 94 Oct-2006 0.41 46.373 41.146 0.5892 95 Nov-2006 0.20 46.574 41.689 0.5435 96 Dec-2006 0.17 46.747 42.175 0.4852 97 Jan-2007 0.17 46.915 42.614 0.4392 98 Feb-2007 0.22 47.134 43.022 0.4077 99 Mar-2007 0.28 47.413 43.414 0.3919 100 Apr-2007 0.48 47.892 43.806 0.3923 101 May-2007 0.60 48.495 44.224 0.4185 Year 9 102 Jun-2007 0.86 49.356 44.685 0.4605 103 Jul-2007 0.96 50.312 45.209 0.5242 5.84 104 Aug-2007 0.88 51.190 45.791 0.5822 105 Sep-2007 0.62 51.807 46.399 0.6081 106 Oct-2007 0.41 52.217 46.989 0.5893 107 Nov-2007 0.20 52.418 47.532 0.5436 108 Dec-2007 0.17 52.590 48.017 0.4853 109 Jan-2008 0.17 52.758 48.457 0.4392 110 Feb-2008 0.22 52.977 48.864 0.4078 111 Mar-2008 0.28 53.257 49.256 0.3920 112 Apr-2008 0.48 53.736 49.649 0.3924 113 May-2008 0.60 54.338 50.067 0.4185 Year 10 114 Jun-2008 0.86 55.199 50.528 0.4605 115 Jul-2008 0.96 56.155 51.052 0.5242 5.84 116 Aug-2008 0.88 57.034 51.634 0.5823 117 Sep-2008 0.62 57.651 52.242 0.6081 118 Oct-2008 0.41 58.060 52.832 0.5893 119 Nov-2008 0.20 58.261 53.375 0.5436 120 Dec-2008 0.17 58.433 53.861 0.4853 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Weld ) AFFIDAVIT OF USE I, Harold Tateyama , swear that the following is true to the best of my knowledge: 1. My present address is: 4-143o %4 cSl �3 coL,,kjAt u bobio The farm has been in the family since 1941 . The property irrigated under the Eaton Ditch is located in the F 1/2, Section g , Township 7N , Range 65W, 6th PM. in Weld County, Colorado. 2. I am over the age of twenty-one years. 3. I am personally knowledgeable of the uses of water from the Eaton Ditch on the land shown in the aerial photo attached hereto. 4. The surface water rights historically used for irrigation on the land were 4 shares in the Larimer& Weld Irrigation Company, 4 shares in the Larimer& Weld Reservoir Company, and 2 shares in the Windsor Reservoir& Canal Company. 5. The surface water rights were insufficient in meeting the irrigation requirement of the crops. 6. There are seven wells on the property augmented under the Cache la Poudre Water Users Association. Five wells were used to supplement the surface water rights. The other two wells were not used. 7. The surface water rights were used to extinction each irrigation season, and the wells were always used to supply additional water for crop consumption. 8. The water rights were used to irrigate approximately 163 acres of land. 9. The cropping pattern was as follows: 25% Alfalfa, 25% Corn, 25% Beans, 25% Sugar Beets Dated this 1 day of moo,:(t , 1999. o Tateyama Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 day of Mat-c-t , 199$'. "> Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 12 " J - 2001 e§.*OTgq*******�' Notary Public • •• I/ % • • I I • I ¶' A G i .. OF COQ _ My Commission Eiflis s APPENDIX E Average Year Blaney-Criddle Model EXHIBIT N ar Appendix A Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Beans Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 100 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 100 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F) = 60 Earliest Growth Date = May 21 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F) = 32 Latest Growth Date = Augaust 28 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U .1l- Kt KD K P F Season (inches) January -- N/A -- 27.3 0.16 0.50 0.08 6.74 1.84 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 33.0 0.26 0.50 0.13 6.71 2.22 0% 0.00 March -- N/A -- 40.7 0.39 0.50 0.20 8.32 3.39 0% 0.00 April -- N/A -- 49.1 0.54 0.50 0.27 8.93 4.39 0% 0.00 May May 25 61.3 0.75 0.59 0.44 10.02 6.14 35% 0.97 June June 15 68.0 0.86 1.05 0.90 10.10 6.87 100% 6.21 July July 15 73.1 0.95 1.00 0.95 10.23 7.48 100% 7.08 August August 14 71.4 0.92 0.60 0.55 9.56 6.82 90% 3.40 September -- N/A — 62.4 0.77 0.50 0.38 8.39 5.24 0% 0.00 October -- N/A -- 50.6 0.56 0.50 0.28 7.75 3.92 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 37.1 0.33 0.50 0.16 6.72 2.49 0% 0.00 December --N/A -- 28.6 0.18 0.50 0.09 6.53 1.87 0% 0.00 Equations: U = K'F'(% of Month in Growing Season) f K = Kt*K0 F = (t*P)/100 7t mttleAppiegatejnc. K,- 0.01730)-0.314 Coormmu mrt,oe,Minera.oa w.mr D<.nnpm<m 11990 Grant St.,Suite 304.Denver.CO 80233 Appendix A Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Alfalfa Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 157 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = Variable Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (F) = 50 Earliest Growth Date = April 18 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 28 Latest Growth Date = September 21 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use, t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U en IC) Kt K P F Season (inches) January -- N/A -- 27.3 0.16 0.63 0.10 6.74 1.84 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 33.0 0.26 0.73 0.19 6.71 2.22 0% 0.00 March --N/A -- 40.7 0.39 0.86 0.34 8.32 3.39 0% 0.00 April April 23 _ 51.5 0.58 1.02 0.59 8.93 4.60 43% 1.17 May May 15 58.1 0.69 1.09 _ 0.75 10.02 5.82 100% 4.39 June June 15 68.0 0.86 1.13 0.97 10.10 6.87 100% 6.69 July July 15 73.1 0.95 1.11 1.06 10.23 7.48 100% 7.89 August August 15 71.3 0.92 1.06 ` 0.97 9.56 6.81 100% 6.64 September September 10 63.8 0.79 1.00 0.79 8.39 5.36 70% 2.97 October -- N/A -- 50.6 0.56 0.91 0.51 7.75 3.92 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 37.1 0.33 0.78 0.26 6.72 2.49 0% 0.00 December -- N/A -- 28.6 0.18 0.64 0.12 6.53 1.87 0% 0.00 a. Equations: r a U = K'Fa(% of Month in Growing Season) a as K= Kt*K° — F = (t*P)/100 lluttleApplegate,inc. K1= 0.0173(t)-0.314 co..awms mr�..a.mm...1..e weer Dnven9menl 11990 Grant SI.,Suite 304,Denver,CO 80233 Appendix A Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Corn Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 140 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 140 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 55 Earliest Growth Date = May 5 Latest Growth Date Temperature (IF)= 32 Latest Growth Date = September 21 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U en Kt K0 K P F Season (inches) January -- N/A -- 27.3 0.16 0.42 0.07 6.74 1.84 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 33.0 0.26 0.42 0.11 6.71 2.22 0% 0.00 March -- N/A -- 40.7 0.39 0.42 0.16 8.32 3.39 0% 0.00 April -- N/A -- 49.1 0.54 0.42 0.22 8.93 4.39 0% 0.00 May May 17 58.7 0.70 0.53 0.37 10.02 5.89 87% 1.91 June June 15 68.0 0.86 0.80 0.69 10.10 6.87 100% 4.74 July July 15 73.1 0.95 1.06 1.01 10.23 7.48 100% 7.56 August August 15 71.3 0.92 1.04 0.96 9.56 6.81 100% 6.52 September September 10 63.8 0.79 0.96 0.76 8.39 5.36 70% 2.84 October -- N/A -- 50.6 0.56 0.42 0.24 7.75 3.92 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 37.1 0.33 0.42 0.14 6.72 2.49 0% 0.00 December — N/A -- 28.6 0.18 0.42 0.08 6.53 1.87 0% _ 0.00 Equations: r '7 U = K'F'(% of Month in Growing Season) im a K = K1'K° c F = (rP)/100 7littleApplegate,lna Kt= 0.01 /3(t)-0.314 Gee.mtantu m.�.ee.Mm..a.ee w.m.Develenment 11990 Grant SL,Suite 304.Denver,CO 80233 Appendix A Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 9/31/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Sugar Beets Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 180 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 180 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 28 Earliest Growth Date = March 15 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F) = 28 Latest Growth Date = September 10 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of= Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U (°F) _ K, K° K P F Season (inches) January --N/A -- 27.3 0.16 0.45 0.07 6.74 1.84 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 33.0 0.26 0.45 0.12 6.71 2.22 0% 0.00 March March 22 42.6 0.42 0.49 0.21 8.32 3.54 55% 0.40 April April 15 49.1 0.54 _ 0.71 0.38 8.93 4.39 100% 1.67 May May 15 58.1 0.69 1.01 0.70 10.02 5.82 100% 4.06 June June 15 68.0 0.86 1.20 1.03 10.10 6.87 100% 7.11 July July 15 73.1 _ 0.95 1.23 1.17 10.23 7.48 100% 8.76 August August 15 71.3 0.92 1.10 1.01 9.56 6.81 100% 6.89 September September 5 65.3 0.82 1.04 0.85 8.39 5.48 33% 1.55 October — N/A -- 50.6 0.56 0.45 0.25 7.75 3.92 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 37.1 0.33 0.45 0.15 6.72 2.49 0% 0.00 December -- N/A — 28.6 0.18 0.45 0.08 6.53 1.87 0% 0.00 Equations: : •_ Er U = ICF'(% of Month in Growing Season) =ii _ K = K,'K° F = (rP)/100 'IUttleApplegate,lnc. Kt = 0.0173(t)-U.314 Consultants for Land.Mineral and Water Development 11990 Grano St,Suite 304 Denver.CO 60233 APPENDIX F 1983 Information and Wet Year Blaney-Criddle Model EXHIBIT Pr l of 1 Monthly Climatic Data for GREELEY UNC for years 1983 - 1983 Station - 53553 Latitude - 4025 Longitude - 10442 Elevation - 4650 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Monthly mean temperature. Ave 33 .1 37 .3 38.7 42 .4 53. 1 63 .8 72 .9 75. 0 64.1 52 .6 36.7 16.1 48 .8 Max 33 .1 37.3 38.7 42 .4 53.1 63 .8 72 .9 75. 0 64 . 1 52 .6 36.7 16.1 48.8 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Min 33 .1 37.3 38.7 42.4 53 .1 63.8 72.9 75.0 64.1 52.6 36.7 16.1 48.8 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Monthly mean maximum temperature. Ave 46.5 52 .0 49.9 54 . 8 66.3 77.2 88.1 90.6 82.4 69.4 49.2 26.2 62 .7 Max 46.5 52 .0 49.9 54 .8 66.3 77.2 88.1 90 .6 82 .4 69.4 49.2 26.2 62 .7 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Min 46.5 52 .0 49.9 54 .8 66.3 77 .2 88. 1 90.6 82 .4 69.4 49.2 26.2 62.7 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Monthly mean minimum temperature. Ave 19.7 22 .7 27.5 30.0 40.0 50.3 57.6 59.4 45 . 9 35.8 24 .3 6.0 34.9 Max 19.7 22.7 27.5 30.0 40.0 50.3 57.6 59.4 45.9 35.8 24 .3 6.0 34.9 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Min 19.7 22 .7 27.5 30.0 40.0 50.3 57.6 59.4 45.9 35.8 24.3 6.0 34 .9 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total monthly precipitation. Ave 0.05 0.02 2 .74 3 .40 5 . 05 3 .68 1.81 0.50 0.26 0. 16 2 .29 0.83 20.79 Max 0.05 0.02 2 .74 3 .40 5.05 3 .68 1.81 0.50 0.26 0.16 2.29 0.83 20.79 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Min 0.05 0.02 2 .74 3 .40 5.05 3 .68 1.81 0.50 0.26 0. 16 2.29 0. 83 20.79 Year 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 1983 Count 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mlydb.pl 2/23/99 Appendix B Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Beans Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 100 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 100 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F) = 60 Earliest Growth Date = June 4 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 32 Latest Growth Date= September 28 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U ('F1 K1 K° K P F Season (inches) January --N/A -- 33.1 0.26 0.50 0.13 6.74 2.23 0% 0.00 February --N/A -- 37.3 0.33 0.50 0.17 6.71 2.50 0% 0.00 March -- N/A -- 38.7 0.36 0.50 0.18 8.32 3.22 0% 0.00 April -- N/A -- 42.4 0.42 0.50 0.21 8.93 3.79 0% 0.00 May -- N/A -- 53.1 0.60 0.50 0.30 10.02 5.32 0% 0.00 June June 16 64.1 0.79 0.84 0.67 10.10 6.47 90% 3.90 July July 15 72.9 0.95 1.11 1.06 10.23 7.46 100% 7.87 August August 15 75.0 0.98 0.76 0.74 9.56 7.17 100% 5.33 September September 5 67.6 0.86 0.60 0.51 8.39 5.67 37% 1.07 October -- N/A -- 52.6 0.60 0.50 0.30 7.75 4.07 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 36.7 0.32 0.50 0.16 6.72 2.47 0% 0.00 December -- N/A — 16.1 -0.04 0.50 -0.02 6.53 1.05 0% 0.00 a. Equations: __ U = K'F'(°/d of Month in Growing Season) = K = K,Kc = F = (t'P)/100 luttleApplegate,mc. K,= 0.0 1 73(t)-0.314 coofullau for Lead.Mineral end Water Development 11090 Grant St Suite 304,Denver,CO 80233 Appendix B Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Alfalfa Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 138 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = Variable Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 50 Earliest Growth Date = May 7 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 28 Latest Growth Date = September 21 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U 1°F) Kt Ky K P F Season (inches) January --N/A -- 33.1 0.26 0.63 0.16 6.74 2.23 0% 0.00 February --N/A -- 37.3 0.33 0.73 0.24 6.71 2.50 0% 0.00 March -- N/A -- 38.7 0.36 0.86 0.31 8.32 3.22 0% 0.00 April --N/A -- 42.4 0.42 0.99 0.42 8.93 3.79 0% 0.00 May May 18 54.1 0.62 1.09 0.68 10.02 5.42 81% 2.98 June June 15 63.8 0.79 1.13 0.89 10.10 6.44 100% 5.75 July July 15 72.9 0.95 1.11 1.05 10.23 7.46 100% 7.84 August _ August 15 75.0 0.98 1.06 1.04 9.56 7.17 100% 7.47 September September 10 65.9 0.83 1.00 0.83 8.39 5.53 70% 3.20 October -- N/A -- 52.6 0.60 0.91 0.54 7.75 4.07 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 36.7 0.32 0.78 0.25 6.72 2.47 0% „ 0.00 December -- N/A -- 16.1 -0.04 0.64 -0.02 6.53 1.05 0% 0.00 Equations: r -= U = K*F*(% of Month in Growing Season) - — as K = Kt'K° F = (t*P)/100 7trttleApplegate,Ino. Ki= 0.0173(i)- 0.314 Consultants for Land,Mineral and Water Development 11990 Grant 5L,Suite 304 Denver,CO 80233 Appendix B Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 10/14/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Corn Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 140 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 140 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 55 Earliest Growth Date = May 21 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 32 Latest Growth Date = September 21 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use d Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U. eFl_ Kt K° K P F Season (inches) January -- N/A -- 33.1 0.26 0.42 0.11 6.74 2.23 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 37.3 0.33 0.42 0.14 6.71 2.50 0% 0.00 March -- N/A -- 38.7 0.36 0.42 0.15 8.32 3.22 0% 0.00 April -- N/A -- 42.4 0.42 0.42 0.18 8.93 3.79 0% 0.00 May May 25 56.6 0.66 0.44 0.29 10.02 5.67 35% 0.59 June June 15 63.8 0.79 0.62 0.49 10.10 6.44 100% 3.17 July July 15 72.9 0.95 0.98 0.93 10.23 7.46 100% 6.94 August August 15 75.0 0.98 1.07 1.06 9.56 7.17 100% 7.57 September September 15 64.1 0.79 1.00 0.79 8.39 5.38 100% 4.28 October October 3 57.2 0.68 0.96 0.65 7.75 4.43 23% 0.65 November -- N/A -- 36.7 0.32 0.42 0.13 6.72 2.47 0% 0.00 December -- N/A -- 16.1 _ -0.04 0.42 -0.01 6.53 1.05 0% 0.00 a Equations: r _ U = K*FP(% of Month in Growing Season) s K = K,eK° F = (t*P)/100 7trttleApplegate,lnc. K,= 0.0173(t)-0.314 Consonants for Land.Mineral and Water Develop ment m 11990 Grant St Suite 304,Denver.CO 90233 Appendix B Job Number: 98-238 Colorado Fisheries Date: 9/31/98 Tateyama Property Calc. By: SPN Modified Blaney-Criddle Consumptive Use Analysis Crop: Sugar Beets Calculated Number of Days in Growing Season = 180 Weather Station: Greeley UNC Maximum Number of Days in Growth Period = 180 Latitude of Project Site: 40.15 Earliest Growth Date Temperature (F)= 28 Earliest Growth Date = March 15 Latest Growth Date Temperature (°F)= 28 Latest Growth Date = September 9 Midpoint of Mean Monthly Climate Growth Consumptive Percent Daylight for Consumptive Percent of Potential Crop Month Growth Period Temperature Coefficient Stage Use 40.15 Use Month in Consumptive Use t Coefficient Coefficient Degrees Latitude Factor Growing U (F) K{ Kt K P F Season (inches) January -- N/A -- 33.1 0.26 0.45 0.12 6.74 2.23 0% 0.00 February -- N/A -- 37.3 0.33 0.45 0.15 6.71 2.50 0% 0.00 March March 22 39.5 0.37 0.49 0.18 8.32 3.29 55% 0.33 April April 15 42.4 0.42 0.71 0.30 8.93 3.79 100% 1.13 May May 15 53.1 0.60 1.01 0.61 10.02 5.32 100% 3.24 June June 15 63.8 - 0.79 1.20 0.95 10.10 6.44 100% 6.11 July July 15 72.9 0.95 1.23 1.17 10.23 7.46 100% 8.70 August August 15 75.0 0.98 1.10 1.08 9.56 7.17 100% 7.75 September September 5 67.6 0.86 1.04 _ 0.89 8.39 5.67 33% 1.68 October --N/A -- 52.6 0.60 _ 0.45 0.27 7.75 4.07 0% 0.00 November -- N/A -- 36.7 0.32 0.45 0.14 6.72 2.47 0% 0.00 December -- N/A -- 16.1 -0.04 0.45 -0.02 6.53 1.05 0% 0.00 Equations: C _— U = K'F'(% of Month in Growing Season) _ K = K1*K. F = (t°P)/100 arttleApplegate,lnc. K,= 0.0173(t)- 0.314 consultants for Land.Mineral and Water Development 11990 Grant St,Suite 304.Denver,Co 00233 APPENDIX G Daily Accounting Form EXHIBIT COLORADO FISHERIES Month _ TATEYAMA PROPERTY Year. SUBSTITUTE WATER SUPPLY PLAN DAILY ACCOUNTING FORM Eaton Ditch Flume Flow into Recharge Pond Flume Direct Flow to Lone Tree Flume Days Reading Flow Reading: . Flow Reading Flow Oft -----(cfs) _ (in) .(�) (in) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 TOTALS: cfs _ cfs cfs ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft Note: To convert cfs to ac-ft, multiply by 1.98347 APPENDIX H Monthly Accounting Spreadsheet EXHIBIT COLORADO FISHERIES TATEYAMA PROPERTY Input: (1)-Sum of"Flow into Recharge Pond"and"Direct Flow to Lone Tree"from monthly accounting form ACCOUNTING SPREADSHEET Actual Colorado Volume of Lagged Fisheries Headgate Consumptive Use Recharge Evaporation Excess/ • Month. Deliveries Recharged at Stream Requirement Deficit (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (1) Jan-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 1 Jul-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-99 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Year 2 Jun-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jul-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 3 Jul-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Actual Colorado Volume of Lagged Fisheries Meadgate Consumptive Use Recharge Evaporation Excess/ Month Deliveries Recharged at Stream Requirement Deficit (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (11 _ Jan-02 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 4 Jul-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 5 Jul-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 6 Jul-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year, Jul-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Actual Colorado Volume of Lagged Fisheries Headgate Consumptive Use Recharge Evaporation Excess/ Month Deliveries Recharged at Stream Requirement Deficit (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (1) Jan-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 8 Jul-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jan-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Jun-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Year 9 Jul-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 _ Aug-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Nov-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jen-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Feb-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Mar-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Apr-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 May-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -0.4 Year 10 Jun-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Jul-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Aug-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Sep-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 Oct-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 -0.6 _ Nov-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Dec-08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 -0.5 Hello