HomeMy WebLinkAbout800474.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR CHAIRMAN TO SIGN APPLICATION FOR SITE
APPROVAL OF NEW SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home
Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the
affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, an application for site approval of new storage
treatment plant for the Town of Windsor has been presented to
the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,
after hearing the favorable recommendations of the Planning Com-
mission, deems it advisable and in the best interests of Weld
County to authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commis-
sioners to sign said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the Chairman of the
Board be, and hereby is, authorized to sign the application
for site approval of new sewage treatment plant.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made
and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 19th day of
March, A.D. , 1980.
*,-y ft tir ` ` x BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: ` 1 -''4 "''`^" , ` .xpxa"ti"/ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Weld County Clerk and Recorder I 2t /2-LL (Aye)
and Clerk to the Boar C. W. Kirby, Chairman
Bp ( u cc. (.2.,-E, (Aye)
• f' G,-,n,.ati L ; 1�1C uJ u��� _...
\ Deputy County ¢ierk Leonard L. Roe, Pro-Tem
� � /�
APPRb.V AS TO FORM: ( (3..4. . (Aye)
Norman Carlson
County Attorney
(Aye)
L cj,Za Dunbar
teAye)
e K. Steinmark
DATE PRESENTED: MARCH 26 , 1980
800474
/P1-0079
•
i.CLOPADO CE?ARTMEITT OF E i,TH
r?TE3 QUALITY CONTROL DI..SION
4210 East 11th Avenue
Leaver, Colorado 30220
•
APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF NEW SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(Required if Serving More Than Twenty Persons)
(Submit in Duplicate)
•
Applicant: Town of Windsor
Address: P. 0. Box 627 Windsor, Colorado 80550
A. Information Regarding Project Submitted for Review:-
1. Briefly describe on a separate sheet of paper the justification for locat-
ing the sewage treatment works on this particular site. This should include,
but is not necessarily limited to, a description of the present and possible
development of the site location and service area.
SEE VICINITY MAP ATTACHED; EXISTING SITE
2. Size and type of treatment facility proposed:
GPD:1.5 x 106 PE served: 157 000 % Industrial: 0
(Gal/day) (Population ecuivalent)
% Domestic: 100 Proposed class of facility: B,
Class of operator required: B1
3. Location of facility: Map - See 'Attached •
Attach a map of the area which includes the following:
(a) • 25-mile radius: all sewage treatment works;
•
(b) 5-mile radius: domestic water supply intakes;
(c) 1-mile radius: habitable buildings, location of potable water wells,
and an approximate indication of the topography.
4. Wastes will be discharged to:
Watercourse Poudre River
(Name of watercourse)
Classification of watercourse B1
Subsurface disposal N/A Land N/A
Evaporation N/A Other N/A
5. If the discharge is to a watercourse, what is the waste load allocation
for that watercourse? N/A; Effluent limiting
That is the re,na4,1i..g wastelcad allocation uncommitted in the basin?
(See 303(e) and 208 Plans) N/A
WQCC approved 1/77
WQ-3 (rev. 3-77-40) .
rte\
6. Does your proposed facility require lift static.. , anywhere in the plant or
service area?. N/A
7. What is the zoning for the proposed service area? N/A
•
Present zoning of site area? Existing pond site
Zoning within a 1-mile radius of site? Agricultural/Industrial
Please explain zoning:
N/A
8. What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest dcrest_c
water supply intake? None
Owner and address: N/A
What is the distance downstream from the discharge to the nearest non- -
domestic water supply intake? Five miles
Name and address: Greeley #3
Greeley Irrigation Company; Greeley, CO 80631 •
9. Sewer lines: Approximate nrm."Pr of feet: N/A
Sizes:
10. Who has the responsibility for operating the facility?
Town of Windsor
What is the legal status of the responsible party?
Town; Colorado
11. Who owns the land upon which the facility will be constructed?
Town of Windsor
Please attach copies of the document creating authority in the applicant to
construct the proposed facility. N/A; Existing site
12. Estimated project cost: $250,000 •
Who is financially responsible for the facility?
Town of Windsor
What is the method of finance? Revenue Bonds •
WQCC approved 1/77
WQ-3 (rev. 3-77-40) —2—
13. Are there any major land developers involved in the development of the
proposed service area? N/A
Give the name, address, and percentage of service area developed by any
person if that percentage of development is greater than 10 percent.
N/A
Of the total PE that you indicated in No. 2, how many of those PE's are
presently existing? 7500 ; are presently committed?
9000 . How many PE's are proposed? 15000
14. Names and addresses of all water and sanitation districts within 5 miles of
proposed wastewater treatment facility site and proposed service area:
N/A
•
Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary.
15. What is the relationship of this facility to any Areawide (208) Plans or
Basin (303(e) ) Plans? (Contact Planning Section, Water Quality Control
Division.) Existing pond system modification to add aeration; 208
personnel review completed.
16. Is the facility in an area subject to flooding? Yes
If so, what precautions are being taken? Existing site; diversion channel
and Poudre River channel carry flood flows
Has the flood plain been designated by the Colorado Water Conservation
Board, Department of Natural Resources? No
If so, what is that designation? N/A
17. List other sites other than the proposed site that were considered.
N/A; Existing site to be utilized
18. Are there any available laboratories for your use? Yes
If so, give name and location of lab. Onsite laboratory facilities of Town
WQCC approved 1/77
WQ-3 (rev. 3-77-40)
-3-
- 7
19. Attach proof that _ copy of this application wa. sent by certified mail
to each of the following federal agencies, recuesting their comment.
(a) United States Forest Service, Director of Watershed, Soils and
Minerals Management, 11177 West 8th Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80225.
(b) National Park Service, Office of Cooperative Activities, Rocky
Mountain Regional Office, 655 Parfet Street, P. O. Box 25287,
Denver, CO 80225.
(c) Bureau of Land Management, State Director (911 Planning) , Room 700,
Colorado State Bank Building, 1600 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203
Please note: These federal agencies do not need to to contacted if the
site that is berg proposed bears no relationship to any of the lands,
st=eams, lakes, or rivers operated by these agencies. The burden is on
the applicant to show that the proposed site does not affect anything
within the jurisdiction of these agencies.
20. Please attach proof of mailing to Director of State Parks, 1313 Sherman,
Denver, CO 80203. The same criterion applies here as in No. 19.
21. Consulting engineer: M & I, Inc.
•
Address: 4710 South College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80525
Telephone: (303) 226-2323
22. ' Please include all additional factors that might help the water Quality
Control Cemm4asion make an informed decision on your application for site
approval.
The Town is adding aeration facilities to existing ponds constructed in 1972.
The proposed facilities have been reviewed by the Larimer-Weld C.O.G. , Weld,
Co. (attached letter) , Colorado District Engineer and local officials.
Date 3/4/80
Signature of Applicant
TOWN OF WINDSOR
WQCC approved .1/77
WQ-3(rev. 3-77-40)
-4-
B. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMI..,TAL OFFICIALS
The undersigned have reviewed the proposal for the location of the above-described
wastewater treatment facility and recommend approval or disapproval in spaces
provided below:
Recommend Recommend No
Date Approval Disapproval Comment Signature of Representative
Local Government (Cities , Towns ,
and Sewer Districts)
r�
Board of County Dommissioners
Lo e Autho y
�� X ounty Pla Wing Agency
Regional Planning Agency
Council of Government
C . Natural Hazards :
Comments of State Geologist regarding possible natural hazards:
Recommend approval :
Recommend disapproval :
Date:
Signature
,J;CC approved 1/77
3 (rev. 3-77-40)
-5-
t / a.
r
F _
/ 1 '� c { \
S ' { n F.W. fq�� `'
Ek
Q n
a�� .� W i j u._ \�
/ �'J t •N W n ��I l �_
Vii' 1 4�FI .y,.. ..- �•� •"
• I < O ^~ \ e7:-';',"',;10-. .1� tt
`�_'T'h�. . i. .1 '�'i 4. 2 ge :t,
__ ^ _-�. RI Cr.? 0 � Yr —j is••-iy re'Co
g<; P� {(�t���� ' _ 2_ O� „ iris:) C
C / GWIM.P/ffP I1.
T ✓r
f ,
vjaf _•FY
V
j t € �
r S-,
I , _..1„. .!,...c. ,, .... sz , , _ ii it,),.___.:2,
_ � ' /-c .i k,-, , �i I ,P- : f / �- f'.p���
z U t
„,__________-w.... ' I
,i ______!;,„%_,qq
/
J :.• {; a -_-� 7'J v�
Jr./ .. p )�� I r 2 �M
.r— _ _ :i
L.• I
•
�,u --"' -1-f�_
M (5C { nc. %'/u-19 j
C.,
JA 03 1980 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE
�C PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.4G
g$,, I3\ 915 10TH STREEE
1q1BrD . 115- GREELEY,COLORADO 8063
COLORADO
December 31, 1979
•
John R. Clark, P.E.
M & I Consulting Engineers
4710 South College Avenue
Fort Collins , Colorado 80525
RE: Windsor Wastewater System Improvements
Dear Mr. Clark:
Based upon a review of the material submitted by you and the Weld
County Zoning Resolution, it appears that there will not be a ✓
requirement to obtain a Special Use Permit for installation of
aeration units to Cell 2.
The Zoning Resolution indicates that a Special Use Permit is required
for a sewage treatment facility. In addition, a Special Use Permit
is required for any expansion or enlargement of a Special Use Permit.
For sewage treatment facilities , expansion does not necessarily
mean in increase of inflow/outflow of sewage and effluent. It has
been determined that an expansion means an increase in inflow/outflow
as a result of structural modifications to enlarge existing facilities
other than that which occurs as normal maintenance.
The Windsor facilities are being altered by placing a divider in an
existing cell and placing an aeration unit in each cell. This manner
of alteration is not a structural modification which enlarges the
facility but rather, as a maintenance measure, allows the facility
to be more efficient within its current design constraints.
If you have further questions regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact me.
V my
homas E. Honn
Zoning Administrator
Hello