HomeMy WebLinkAbout20001186.tiff STATE OF COLORADO
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICED _ f'' 1 '
Office of Self Sufficiency1575 Shennanfittnet
p •C�O�
Deaver,Colorado 80909-1714
Phone: (a0a)866!981 I t ^,
FAX( 1803186684!8 _ �l\4' Y
7 fi/
a ill Mena
Cme ner
wn1...wiw.DI ...,
April 12,2000
Dear County Director:
Enclosed please find the Colorado Works Program work participation rate information for October 1999 through
February 2000(FFY '00 to date). As you can see,our All Families rate has improved in February but the overall
average continues to need improvement. Although the Two Parent rate has broken the declining cycle in January&
February,it is still well below the Federal requirements. I understand the difficulty in meeting the federal
requirements given: (1)the multiple barriers present in the current caseload and(2)the increased average hour
requirement and percentage. Please encourage your staff to contact us for training and technical assistance in these
areas.
These reports maybe e-mailed directly to you or your designee each month in lieu of regular mail. If you would
like to receive these reports electronically,please e-mail Tim Cox at tim.coxAstate.co.us with the e-mail address of
the contact for your county.
If you have questions regarding the enclosed reports or wish to request technical assistance and/or training,please
contact me at(303)866-4404 or Joe Barela at(303)866-5389.
Sincerely,DiVaeLL!) thlt-21-----d
Mary Kay�er
Employment&Training Section
Colorado Works Program
Enclosure
Cc: Chair,County Board of Commissioners
Field Staff
Pia
to s'r
':i' 2000-1186
• Sys
c •
FEDERAL WORK PARTICIPATION RATE FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 FOR TWO PARENT FAMILIES
Participation Rate for February 2000
Oct 1999 Nov 1999 Dec 1999 Jan 2000 Feb 2000 YTD
Average
rate rate rate rate numerator denominator rate rate
ADAMS 0.0% 60,0% 0.0% 100.0% 3 3 100,0°% 52,0%
ALAMOSA 87.5% 40.0% 71.4% 50.0% 3 7 42.9% 58.4%
ARAPAHOE 46.2% 30.8% 70.0% 37.5% 7 16 43.8% 45.6%
ARCHULETA 0.0% na 0.0% O0% 0 0 na 0.0%
BACA na na na na 0 1 0.0% 00%
BENT 100.0% na na 100.0% 2 2 100.0% 100.0%
BOULDER 28.0% 20.0% 6.3% 8.3% 2 8 25.0% 17.5%
CHAFFEE 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 10.0%
CHEYENNE na na na na 0 0 na na
CLEAR CREEK 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% 0 0 na 0.0%
CONEJOS 6.7% 20.0% 17.6% 0.0% 2 II 11.1% 11.1%
COSTILLA 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 3 0.0% 16.7%
CROWLEY 0.0% 33.3% 25.0% 25.0% 2 4 50O% 26.7%
CUSTER 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 20.0%
DELTA 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 3 6 50.0% 32.0%
DENVER 36.4% 23.5% 20.0% 36.6% 10 38 26.3% 28.6%
DOLORES na na 0.0% 100.0% 0 I 0.0% 33.3%
DOUGLAS 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% na I 1 100.0% 50.0%
EAGLE na na na na 0 0 na na
ELBER1 0.0% na 50.0% 0.0% 0 1 0.0% 12.5%
EL PASO 76.0% 71.2% 60.8% 63.5% 40 67 59.7% 66.2%
FREMONT 57.1% 25.0% 50.0% 78.6% 10 13 76.9% 57.5%
GARFIELD 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% I I 100.0% 40.0%
GILPIN 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 1 0.0% 0.0%
GRAND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0 1 0.0% 10,0%
GUNNISON 0.0% 0,0% 100.0% 66.7% 2 3 66.7% 46.7%
HINSDALE na na na na 0 0 na na
HUERFANO 25.0% 42.9% 25,0% 40.0% I 4 25.0% 31.6%
JACKSON na na na na 0 0 na na
JEFFERSON 59.0% 71.4% 71.4% 66.7% 15 21 71.4% 68.0%
KIOWA na na na na 0 0 na na
KIT CARSON na na na na 0 0 na na
LAKE na na na na 0 0 na na
LA PLATA 100.0% 50.0% 66,7% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 43.3%
LARIMER 56.3% 71.4% 84.6% 90.9% 5 5 100:0% 80.6%
LAS ANIMAS 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% I 3 33.3% 40.0%
LINCOLN na na na na 0 0 na na
LOGAN 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 4 0.0% 0.0%
MESA 57.1% 36.4% 30.0% 18.2% 4 15 26.7% 33.7%
MINERAL na na na na 0 0 na na
MOFFAT 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2 3 66,7% 88.3%
MONTEZUMA 40.0% 40.0% 25.0% 20.0% I 7 14.3% 27.9%
MONTROSE 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0 1 0.0% 16.7%
MORGAN 75.0% 40.0% 25.0% 22.2% 5 9 55.6% 43.6%
OTERO 50.0% 50,0% 30.0% 44,4% 5 9 55.6% 46.0%
OURAY na na na na 0 0 na na
PARK na na 0.0% na 0 0 na 0.0%
PHILLIPS na na na na 0 0 na na
PITKIN na na na na 0 0 na na
PROWERS 100,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% I 3 33.3% 26,7%
PUEBLO 50.0% 75.0% 50.0% 20.0% 3 9 33.3% 45.7%
RIO BLANCO na na 0.0% na 0 0 na 0.0%
RIO GRANDE 33,3% 60.0% 22.2% 16.7% 5 13 38.5% 34.1%
ROUTT na na na na 0 0 na na
SAGUACHE na 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 5 40.0% 10.0%
SAN JUAN na 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% I I 100.0% 50,0%
SAN MIGUEL na na na na 0 0 na na
SEDGWICK 0.0% na na na 0 0 na 0.0%
SUMMIT na na na na 0 0 na na •
TELLER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0.0%
WASHINGTON na na na na 0 0 na na
WELD 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 0,0% I 4 25.0% 45.0%
YUMA 0.0% 0.0% na na 0 0 na . 0.0%
STATE 50.3% 45.1% 38.5% 44.1% 143 ' 318 45.0% 44.6%
participation.xls-4/3/00
FEDERAL WORK PARTICIPATION FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 FOR ALI.FAMILIES
Participation Rate for February 20011
Oct 1999 Nov 1999 Dec 1999 Jan 2000 Feb 2000 1"Ill
A.erage
rate rate rale rate numerator denominator rate rate
ADAMS 11.1% 12.9% 108% 80% 34 295 11.5°. I09%
ALAMOSA 33,3% 35.4% 20.0% 20.6% 24 58 41 4% b12".
ARAPAIIOE 31.8% 29,5% 29.8% 24.9% 148 525 28_2%
ARCHULETA 33.3% 23.1% 46.2% 35.3% 7 19 36 8% •49 .
BACA 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% I 8 12 5% r. . .
BENT 88.2% 100.0% O0% 40.0% 8 12 66 7%
BOULDER 296% 24.1% 20.5% 21.8% 53 253 209% 2.V.
CHAFFEE 100% 4.8% 0.0% 5.7% 3 31 97°. r -
CHEYENNE 0.0% 00% 0.0% na 0 0 no -
CLEARCREEK 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 5 0.0%
CONEJOS 21.4% 11.1% 10.8% 6.6% 14 84 167°. I. . .
COSTII.LA 28.6% 17.1% 9.1% 6.7% 3 27 11.1°. 14I.',
CROWLEY 27.8% 36.4% 24.2% 21.2% 9 38 237% 'r^.
CUSTER 50.0% 42.9% 11.1% 0.0% 0 II . 0.0% 2,,I .
DELTA 40,7% 20.9% 26.6% 31.3% 25 64 39.1% 31 7'.
DENVER 29.9% 29.0% 28.2% 29,7% 478 1,484 32.2% 29 I .
DOLORES 25.0% 25.0% 14.3% 60.0% 2 6 33.3% 31 V.
DOUGLAS 54.2% 35.0% 20.8% 43.5% 9 23 39.1% 315%
EAGLE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 5 400% a0'.
ELBERT 0.0% 0.0% 36.4% 20.0% 2 8 25.0% In 3•.
EL PASO 34.2% 33.7% 26.7% 25.6% 363 1,251 29.0% 29 V.
FREMONT 45.4% 42.6% 41.5% 46.9% 58 122 475% 418'.
GARFIELD 53.2% 50.9% 36.0% 31.7% 20 61 32.8% 40 9%
GILPIN 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% 0 8 0.0% 00'.
GRAND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 2 12 16.7% 78%
GUNNISON 28.6% 27.3% 54.5% 60.0% 6 II 54.5% 450%
HINSDALE na na 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 00%
HUERFANO 30,3% 28.9% 12.1% 18.8% 5 24 20.8% 222°.
JACKSON 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0.09.
JEFFERSON 35,5% 39.3% 37.0% 31.8% 184 533 34.5% 35.6%
KIOWA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 3 00% 0.0%
KIT CARSON 50.0% 50,0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 4 50.0% 30.0%
LAKE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 7 0.0% 0.0%
LA PLATA 23.1% 26.9% 25.9% 18.2% 9 40 22.5% 23.3%
LARIMER 33.8% 31.8% 26.8% 24.6% 68 288 23.6% 28.1%
LAS ANIMAS 30.1% 36.1% 20.0% 18.9% 28 72 38.9% 28 8%
LINCOLN 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0.0%
LOGAN 30.8% 37.5% 52.6% 30.0% 12 25 48.0% 39.8%
MESA 32.5% 31.9% 33.3% 38.3% 92 246 37.4% 34.7%
MINERAL 0,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0.096
MOFFAT 32.3% 22.2% 28.2% 34.3% 13 36 36.1% 30.6%
MONTEZUMA 38.1% 29,6% 28.1% 25.0% 13 70 18.6% 27.9%
MONTROSE 33.3% 22.1% 23.0% 29.0% 12 72 16.7% 24.8%
MORGAN 37.3% 30.9% 27.3% 25.0% 25 76 32.9% 30.7%
OTERO 36.1% 42.5% 27.1% 26,1% 31 92 33.7% 33.1%
OURAY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 0.0%
PARK 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 0.0%
PHILLIPS 0.0% na na 0.0% 0 0 na 0.0%
PITKIN 0.0% na na 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 0 0%
PROWERS 25,6% 25,6% 45,7% 39,6% 19 53 35.8% 34.5%
PUEBLO 21.9% 23.4% 21.7% 21.1% 51 234 21.8% 22.0%
RIO BLANCO 500% 60.0% 60.0% 57.1% 3 7 42.9% 54.0%
RIO GRANDE 50.6% 50.0% 32.0% 41.0% 41 95 43.2% 43.3%
ROUTT 66.7% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% I 3 33.3% 33.3%
SAGUACHE 26.1% 9.1% 22.7% 16.0% 6 27 22.2% 19.2%
SAN JUAN na 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 1 3 33.3% 16.7%
SAN MIGUEL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 0.0%
SEDGWICK 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 I 0.0% 10.0%
SUMMIT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 3 0.0% 0.0%
TELLER 23.1% 47.8% 37.9% 48.5% 19 26 73.1% 46.1%
WASHINGTON 100.0% 100.0% na na 0 0 na 100.090
WELD 26.8% 28.4% 23.9% 23.1% 40 141 28.4% 26.1% •
YUMA 0.0% 25.0% 222% 10.0% 5 9 55.6% . 22.6%
STATE 32.1% 31.4% 28.1% 27.5% 2,004 ' 6,622 30.3% 29.990
participation xls-4/3/00
Hello