HomeMy WebLinkAbout20002978 P '4` ?7 Al 9: 34
November 21, 2000
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Subject: Lundvall Annexation
Dear Commissioners:
Enclosed, please fmd information pertaining to a petition for annexation which is located
generally southwest of 83nd Avenue and US 34 Bypass. This 1830 acre annexation will be
considered by the City of Greeley Planning Commission on November 28, 2000, and the
City Council on December 5, 2000, where the ordinance will be introduced and the public
hearing will be on December 19, 2000. The applicants have indicated the proposed uses
at this time primarily includes the continuance of the existing agricultural and oil and gas
operations.
If any questions arise concerning this proposed annexation, please contact me at(970) 350-
9786.
Sin erely, /
Gre ho son
P1 g anager
enclosure
Prate_ re-f)'l ex°
is Al 7O Ai/ (-E17)
SERVING OUR COMMUNITY • I 'I ' s A T R 2000.2978
We promise to preserve anti improve lEe yual ty oMelor 9reeley/ArouyL limey, courteous and cos/e jeclioa service
Attachment E
Annexation Impact Summary
ANNEXATION IMPACT SUMMARY
LUNDVALL ANNEXATION
PROPERTY OWNERS Elmer Lundvall, Faye Lundvall, Matthew
Chismar, Jackie Moore, John Shupe, Public
Service Co. Of Colorado
REPRESENTATIVE Elmer Lundvall
LOCATION Southwest of 83'" Avenue and US 34 Bypass
ACREAGE 1830 Acres
EXISTING USES Single-Family Residences, Agricultural
Production, Oil and Gas Production, Overhead
Power Lines
AVAILABLE UTILITIES City of Greel Water, City of Greeley Sewer,
Greeley
1 3A, TO Cabbl •
•
QWest, Poudre Valley
TAXING DISTRICTS Aims Junior College, Milltken.Fire,jMilliken
Fire Bond,North CoIorair Water'Clamca ianc: ,
School District RE4 SchoolDistrict
RESJ (Milliken/Johosbnwn), River
Recreation, Weld County; Weld , West
Greeley Soil, Windsor Library, Windsor
Severance Fire
INTENDED/PROPOSED USES The property owners have stated their intention
to maintain the existing uses on the property at
the current time.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site lies within the City's within the
boundaries of the Long-Range Expected Growth
Area(LREGA)and Urban Growth Area(UGA),
and outside of the current Mid-Range Expected
Service Area (MRESA) and Municipal Services
Suitability Area (MSSA).
Generally speaking, the existing land uses are
compatible with existing surrounding land uses
both within City limits and in unincorporated
Weld County.
Access is currently possible from 37th Street, 20th
Street, 83R Avenue, 95th Avenue and indirectly
from US 34 Bypass. The 2015 Comprehensive
Transportation Plan identifies US 34 Bypass as
an Expressway, 83n° Avenue (Two Rivers
Parkway) as a major arterial, 20th Street and 37th
Street as minor arterials and 95th Avenue as a
major collector. The plan also includes 28th
Street and 32nd Street as major collectors.
The Comprehensive Plan encourages
development to effectively mitigate any adverse
environmental impact when development occurs
in environmentally sensitive areas. Portions of
this annexation are designated as high or
moderate ecological impact according to the City
of Greeley's Areas of Ecological Significance
map.
SURROUNDING LAND USES North -Rural Residences
South - Agricultural Production, Oil and Gas
Production
East - Oil and Gas Production, Rural
Residences
West - Agticadtural ,Piabicdeu, Rural
Ra
dio Tower,410ist Stables
SURROUNDING ZONING See Attachment A
ANALYSIS The site is adjacent to existing city limits on the
north, and has approximately 19% contiguity.
The annexation is within the City's Long-Range
tulle
Area and Urban Growth Area
r:rtside of the current Mid-Range Expected
Service Area and Municipal Services Suitability
Area.
Developers of the property will be responsible
for extending utility services to the property.
The land use envisioned by the applicant for this
site is the continuation of the existing uses at the
current time.
Since there are no development proposals for
this property at this time, the impact on the two
affected school districts, Windsor and
Milliken/Johnstown cannot be determined. With
the anticipated Holding/Agricultural zone on the
majority of the property, the impact at this time
should be minimal.
The annexation of this site into the city would be
consistent with present growth patterns and
Comprehensive Plan policies, which encourage
future development in areas identified for such
uses. There is clear evidence that this site shares
a common interest with the City's future. The
requirements of State statutes and City of
Greeley guidelines for annexation appear to have
been met by this requested annexation.
ATTACHMENTS Annexation Petition - See Attachment: D
Maps - See Attachments A, B, & C
i A IC ✓ ��, -
F ttachment A .
Vicinity Map
) :
/ .'�j.
r/4re .
•,j�,'
�- OF"f �• � •,. . 0( . l : 4.... .. aBid,a/ 4
S "�.� �;�' wer yd" " F�Y
-
37th Street •..
Proposed Annexations:
Lundvall Annex
Z\ -)
Parcel Line
1 inch equals 2,100 feet '— •
Road
ted 1ty f Greeley 10/30(00 City of Greeley
Program lund ennex.mxd
EXHIBIT A
LUNDVALL ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, AND 14, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH,
RANGE 67 WEST AND IN SECTIONS 7, 17, 18, 19, AND 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE
66 WEST, ALL IN THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SAID TRACT
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
ALL OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34 BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH UNE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AND ADJACENT TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST;
ALL OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34 BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH UNE OF
SECTION 12, AND ALL OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST;
ALL OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34 BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 7 AND ALL OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7. TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST;
ALL OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34 BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND WEST 20TH STREET RIGHT-OF
WAY WITHIN THE THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18 AND ALL OF THE EAST HALF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18 LYING SOUTH OF SAID U.S. HIGHWAY 34
BYPASS RIGHT-OF-WAY;
ALL OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST
LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34 EXCEPT
THAT PART OF HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED WITH THOMPSON FARMS
ANNEXATION, AND ALL THAT PART OF THE PUBUC SERVICE TRACT (BOOK 628,
RECEPTION NO. 1553188) WHICH WAS NOT ANNEXED WITH SAID THOMPSON FARMS
ANNEXATION;
ALL OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 18 EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET, BUT INCLUDING
THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 300 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF THE SOUTH
HALF OF SAID SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST;
THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 300 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET OF 1HE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST;
ALL OF SECTION 19 EXCEPT LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION 0959-19-1-RE667 (BOOK
1120, RECEPTION NO. 2060949) AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID SECTION 19,
TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST;
THE NORTH 30 FEET OF SECTION 30 EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID NORTH 30
FEET OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH RANGE 66 WEST;
SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 1,830 ACRES. H-
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
1 Attachment B`---
. Map Delineating the LREGA, MRESA and MSS
risky,,1\I\I\ ^ r�.y •.
p ' , .••5 _ 10
•. •GI
r�
U S 3 p xce ' tfo i ■ I _
k-2
��f ilz
�. TIP, n ' r
y .
1Tp i f �,, Y },y
:' �y't . rT.tl � # p Lie: I ." 2• r �, '.r .. ��ti•
d, ,,yt 1 r.. ✓ hl ' e 4t1
•t". . I n fie,sl,. -7.r" �..e m.
/ U e - Y yLR. 4 1• . i .r3
' .Y r
yY '• 'psi.y 4 _. 1"-,14i� e >
e 11r'
11li 3• •::
y
�
yrxi, A
,�► , Eliii
4
•
�..,;, • ,. .ND ,AtchmentCh �
Lundvall Annexation Plat
•
4 1 ( 11th1
el
l I
h X18 d
lin g4 k
_ I.
li
,,,::: micircy . ,
ki . iiir lirkTat ram I
g ii I INA ' All I a
mg:., E■
I i M I .'
,
. 1 ;
lit'
'
> f
til s\ i I IC
t \pa ss%
g ,..
. , „ , _____
ia il torearl
!, SI
•
gi Ha ! III 6> !
W N
I�J�U ' 'fJQV
b
N ii P I Iv 1 1 �i
< w is ;Ili . I !
N
M99 M
SO S r� al i MI
'NY Piz it WWI K ill Sib iii\cgs
ENO b USNM
own. If P ��! NownamY imam ` N
CI
7 ‘......._____, u
I I V £ N`I I
N.
Ii ` : . / _ it1 ._4 . ,.
I, : �` �' I i id : hi W
: nil th il ik O, S
g it, t••l\.w 2 111 1
I E . - h it
II
k i .. IMI:$ 0#
apa
1 rI
iii
iiE shis z� it 1, SIR �, j 1t�
a a\.�r\:OD...\\\�m�.\cm�.\ -470. ._ . . _ . . _.. . _ . . _ . . .
: O,,
i �
_i ; !
lig
--
lir
1f
I g ' I I d_....,„.„ , „
, „O,\ I ;
AttaCbmnnt D
Landvau Annexation Narrative Annexation Petition
1. The proposed annexation is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Response: The subject property is located in the Urban Growth Area(UGA)according to
the 2020 Comp.Plan. The UGA indicates a full complement of land uses which would
be developed at urban densities is anticipated when development occurs.
Portions of the annexation are identified as having high and moderate areas of ecological
significance according to the Physiograpic Area Map. When further development is
proposed,this issue will need to be addressed by the developers.
The inclusion of these properties into the City's jurisdiction meets comprehensive plan
growth objectives and can be developed in a manner which will be a positive addition to
the City,improve the quality of Greeley's neighborhoods,and can be provided with
municipal services.
2. The proposed annexation promotes geographical balance of the City's land use pattern.
Response:The annexation continues a pattern of City of Greeley development south of
US 34 Bypass. This annexation allows the City to extend the City limits in a manner
which continues traditional development patterns.
3. Adequate services are or will be available to support the development expected to result
from the proposed annexation.
Response:At the current time,further development of the property is not anticipated.
The property can be served by City of Greeley services. When further development is
proposed in the fixture,the developers will be responsible to extend services to the
developing property.
4. The proposed annexation provides for a continual and rational boundary.
Response: This annexation gets contiguity from several properties which have been
previously annexed and continues a traditional development pattern for Greeley to
develop south of US 34 Bypass.
5. The proposed annexation is needed to accommodate future land use requirements.
Response: 83n°Avenue is identified as a major arterial street according to the City of
Greeley Transportation Master Plan. This annexation is adjacent to this important
transportation corridor and offers the City options to accommodate land use requirements
which the City believes are important to growth and development in this area.
PBYTI1ON FOR ANNBICATION . :.I SEP 1 1 2000 `
i(
• 1Qvicer 1— ANNEXATION
• TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND an COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF •
GREELEY, COLORADO:
The undersigned, in accordance with Title 31, Article 12, ithaptea- 101 et seq., •
Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended,hereby petition the City Council of the
City of Greeley for annexation to the City of Greeley of of the territory.described herein
. Ind described and s[(h��own on the deeiguaM bustlyed�L/
are • Faarhania. eadd map are
vasty beadry • - thcaauertlon
to the C of Cate ey is set�Bshl A attached heath and inooapmated hetdn
by-rehraooe.
In support of Oa petition. the Pbdtiooa±(s) allege(s) that
1. It Is desiable and necessary that the abovadescribed teaitory be annexed to the
. City of enmity.
. 2. The re uite:meats of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12405 of the Colorado Revised •
• Statutes exist or have been met in that
A. Not less .than one-sixth (1/6) of the perimeter of the area proposed to be
ended is contiguous with-the City of Cheeky. ' _
B:. A community of kict+est tp4sts between the territory proposed to be annexed
and the City of Greeley.• -s
C. The territory Sought to.be aimexed is urban or will be urbanized In.ire near
• • .__ • -
•
•
D. The tr. . sought to be, annexed is integrated or is capaable of being . :k •
• . integrated F F„ the City of Greeley.
3. in establishing the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed, no land
held in identical ownership, whether 000slating of one tractor parcel of real estate
• or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels•of real estate.'has/have been divided
into separate pares or parcels of real estate without the written consent of the land
owner or land owners thereof, except and unless where such tracts or parcels are
already separated by a dedicated street, Sad, or other public way.
4. In establishing the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed, no land
held in identical ownership, whether consisting of one tract or parcel of rear estate •
or two or more contiguous tracts or parcels of real estate comprising twenty (20)
acres or more which with the ., I . r> and improvements situated ttier+son
have an assessed valuation in excess of$200, for ad valorem tax purposes for
the year neat preceding the filing of the written petition for annexation,
•
10. Except as otherwise provided, no of the territory sought to be annexed is more
than three miles from a point on the municipal boundary, as such was established
more than one year betbne this annexation will become edbodve.
11. As an exp condition of annextion, land owner(s)oonsent(s)to inclusion into
• the Northern Colorado Water ►anav District and the municipal subdistrict
pu
rsuant to Section 37.45-196 (3.6) C.R.B. Land owner(s) agiutowledge(s) that,
.upon hmobtaion into the district and Subdistrict, land owner s(s') property will be
subject to the same mill levies and.special assessments as are levied or will be •
levied on other similarly situated yin the district and subdistrict at the time
of inclusion of land owner's(:') landspLand owner(s) agree(s) to waive any right
to an election which may exist Co maim*selection pursuant to Article X, Section
20 of the Colorado Constkudon before the district and sobdlsbiot can impose such
mill levies and o aesemosceS wmen,�lnaluslonRing the m6oft, to*wee. Land aq i owner(s)
to a net'lmd
• also agree(s)
• pungent to Ardcie X, deaden 70, of the Colorado Constitution.
undersigned respectfully petitloo(s) tha ay Council of the(fir of
• Greeley, to ennui the dmorSted and warred A to the City of
• Greeley in accordance.wilt sod prima to the statutes of the State of Colorado.
la 0 aflame') and Signatures) Midlinaddosialate of sl
See attached • -
•
the foregoing aignatme(s) waste subsaibed and sworn to before me this day•• of
. 19_rb3'
Witless mY had and official seal:
• My commission expires
foamy Public
end owned
necessary, attach separate sheet. •
"OWNERS"
'Jo hisizar 'aoa/k/a Chismar,
a Jackie Moore-Davis
r1/2L
CHISM RE,LLC
By C
F Lundvall J ' Moore,nik/aJaokie Moore,Manager
LUNDV -SIX,LLC LUNDV LLC
er E.Luadva euager E.Lundvalj idanager
JOHNS CO. ,'�,,
By �� . C1_
John Shupe,President
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss
COUNTY OF WELD )
The foregoing signahms were subscribed and sworn to before me this 6a day of September,
2000.
Witness my hand and official seal. ** nn__
dtClShl
Notary lic VV
`, nunm totb,
Mac%My Commission Expires: i' , a, t .0 0•Tt"e,—
ifcoal,
OF Oer
ape imendoe 090600:0 Page 4 of 4
•
CITY OF GREELEY ANNEXATION INFORMATION SHEET
The following information is required to process the annexation of land into the City of
Greeley. This sheet must be attached to a=MS annexation petition.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Date September 6, 2000
1. Name of A waxalion Lundvall Annexation
2. Name of Property Owner(s) See attached
Street or Road Addresses of All Properties to be Annexed.(Attach separate sheet
if necessary): •
•
See attached
•
•
•
3. Person to Contact (Name, Address and Phone) •
Roy Lundvall, P. 0. Box 632, Greeley, CO 80632; Telephone 970-339-8730
4. Size (*macros) Approximately 2,300
Sites larger .than 10 acres require (as per C.R.S. 31-12-108.5, amended) an
annexation impact report. The annexing body and the Comty Commissioners may .
agree to waive such report, but a letter to that effect must accompany this petition.
•
Check One: [x :Land Owner-Initiated
[.[x1
Municipally Owned (C.R.S. 31-12-106)
[ Enclave S. 31-1122--106)
. 5. a list Sall special dish(including school dislikes)of which the territory
. proposed for•annexatton is part. '
6. Attach a list of all residents (and their addresses) of the territory proposed for
annexation who are not land owners.
7. Attach a description of the intended use and development of the territory proposed
for annexation. Such a description should be as complete as possible and include:
■ Tee h location audio ,
of streets alaS use nd utilitylines.
•
■ Existing and existing zoning.
Size of 'or todueaiaf erns s
t
■ Estimated number of school students generated.
• Number of dwelling units.
Hello