HomeMy WebLinkAbout20002041 FY 2001-2006 STIP: (IN INFLATED DOLLARS) Approved
July 25 2000 07:19 am
Southwest
l i
Reg STIP TiP Route Length County Project Irrmrovemenl Type Funomg (Dollars in Thousands)
# # # # (Miles) Sponsor Source Type FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001-03 FY 2004-06 Future
Gaming
Southwest Colorado Gaming Related Maintenance Activities
05 SW5196 La Plata CDOT R5 CDOT Operations
G GAME 147 154 162 463 349 0
Total 147 '154 162 463 349 0
Gaming SUBTOTAL- 147 154 162 463 349 0
Oth Reg Prios
Wash 6 ml.N.of US 666(P-02-c)-minor
05 SW3663 160A 05 Montezuma CDOT R5 Safety-Roadway
F NH 2,916 0 0 2,916 0 0
S SHF 584 0 0 584 0 0
Total 3,500 0 0 3,500 0 0
8th St to North&South Pagosa Blvd
05 SW5038 160A 4.9 Archuleta CDOT R5 Reconst-Added Cap.-Hwy
F NH 0 0 583 583 4,831 0
S SHF 0 0 117 117 969 0
Total 0 0 700 700 5.800 0
Florida River to 1 mi E/0 Bayflefd
05 5W5039 160A 10.8 La Plata CDOT R5 Safety-Roadway
F NH 0 0 0 0 1,166 0
S SHF 0 0 0 0 234 0
Total 0 0 0 0 1,400 0
Oth Reg Prios SUBTOTAL- 3,500 0 700 4,200 7,200 0
Southwest TOTAL- 5,089 354 1,062 6,505 7,549 0
Page 7z w 89 2OOO-2041
tip
C
P4
CI
LIN
FY 2001-2006 STIP: L INFLATED DOLLARS) Approved
July 25 200,. 07:19 am
Upper Front Range
Reg STIP TIP Route Length County Project Improvement Type Funding (Dollars in Thousands)
# # # # (Miles) Sponsor Source Type FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001-03 FY 2004.06 Future
USC5309
Weld County(CASTA)
04 UF5279 Weld WELD COUNTY 340
F 5309 119 0 0 119 0 0
L L 24 0 0 24 0 0
Total 143 0 0 143 0 0
USC5309 SUBTOTAL- 143 0 0 143 0 0
Bridge On Sys
US 6:Kiowa Creek(West of Wiggins) [Str.D-20-O)
04 UF3859 0061 0.1 Morgan CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F BR 0 0 0 0 306 2,551
S SHF 0 0 0 0 88 732
Total 0 0 0 0 394 3,283
US 34:At Big Thompson River(E/O Estes Park)[Str C-15-H]
04 UF971N 034A 0.1 Larimer CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F BR 0 1,117 0 1,117 0 0
S SHF 0 320 0 320 0 0
Total 0 1437 0 1,437 0 0
US 34:In Big Thompson Canyon Istr C-15-A,D&GI
04 UF971R 034A 0.1 Larimer CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F BR 0 2,988 274 3.262 0 0
S SHF 0 857 78 935 0 0
Total 0 3,845 352 4,197 0 0
SH 144:At S Platte River 8 At Bijou Canal[Str C-20-B&AP]
04 UF9715 144A 3.3 Morgan CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F BR 2,196 0 0 2,196 0 0
S SHF 630 0 0 630 0 0
Total 2,826 0 0 2,826 0 0
US 85:At Spring Creek(N/O Pierce) [Str B-17-G]
04 UF971Y 085C 0.1 Weld CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F BR 0 0 155 155 846
S SHF 0 0 45 45 243 0
Total 0 0 200 200 1O89 0
Bridge On Sys SUBTOTAL - 2.826 5.282 552 8,660 1,483 3,283
Bridge Off Sys
Weld CR 13 at St Vrain Creek(Str WEL013.0-026 OA]
04 UF5093 Weld WELD COUNTY Bridge
F BRO 222 888 0 1,110 0 0
Page 73 of 89
FY 2001-2006 STIP: (IN INFLATED DOLLARS) Approved
July 25 2000 07:19 am
Upper Front Range
Reg STIP TIP Route Length County Project Improvement Type Funding (Dollars in Thousands)
# # # # (Miles) Sponsor Source Type FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001-03 FY 2004.06 Future
Bridge Off Sys
Weld CR 13 at St Vraln Creek(Str WEL013.0-026.0A]
04 UF5093 Weld WELD COUNTY Bridge
L L 64 255 0 319 0 0
Total 286 1.143 0 1,429 0 0
Bridge Off Sys SUBTOTAL- 286 1.143 0 1,429 0 0
Enhancement
Enhancement Reserves-Upper Front Range TPR
04 UF5096 Various VARIOUS Enhancements-System Oualit
F STE 229 257 266 752 898 0
L L 57 64 67 188 224 0
Total 286 321 333 940 1.122 0
Enhancement SUBTOTAL- 286 321 333 940 1,122 0
Oth Reg Prios
I-76:Hudson to Keenesburg
04 UF2070 076A 9.4 Weld CDOT REGION 4 Reconstruction
F IM 13,908 0 0 13,908 0 0
S SHF 1,790 0 0 1,790 0 0
Total 15,698 0 0 15,698 0 0
R-4 Bridge Rehabilitation-Upper Front Range TPR
04 UF3383 Various CDOT REGION 4 Bridge
F STA 0 449 0 449 494 0
S SHF 0 109 0 109 120 0
Total 0 558 0 558 614 0
I.76:Ft Morgan to Brush
04 UF3397 076A 13.9 Morgan CDOT REGION 4 Reconstruction
F IM 0 1,152 520 1,672 14,255 90,352
S SHF 0 148 67 215 1,834 11,625
Total 0 1,300 587 1,887 16,089 101,977
i-76:Keenesburg-East
04 UF3398 076A 9.6 Weld CDOT REGION 4 Reconstruction
F !M n 225 305 531 981 20 992
S SHF 0 29 J9 66 726 2,701
'4.. 590 ,.rn 22500
Estes Valley/RMNP Study
041155051 Larimer COOT REGION 4 Corridor Study/Intermodal Stud
F __ _ 190 0
Page 74 of 89
FY 2001-2006 STIP: - INFLATED DOLLARS) Approved
July 25 200u 07:19 am
Upper Front Range
Reg STIP TIP Route Length County Project Improvement Type Funding (Dollars in Thousands)
# # # # (Miles) Sponsor Source Type FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2001-03 FY 2004-06 Future
Oth Reg Prios
Estes Valley/RMNP Study
04 UF5051 Larimer CDOT REGION 4 Corridor Study/Intermodal Stud
S SHF 46 0 0 46 0 0
Total 236 0 0 236 0 0
US 85:At SH 66(Platteville)
04 UF5052 085C 0.8 Weld CDOT REGION 4 Safety-Roadway
F NH 0 42 177 219 0 0
S SHF 0 8 36 44 0 0
Total 0 50 213 263 0 0
5H 60:At 83rd Ave(Two Rivers Parkway)
04 UF5053 0606 0.4 Weld CDOT REGION 4 Safety-Roadway
F STA 0 0 439 439 2,555 0
S SHF 0 0 107 107 623 0
Total 0 0 546 546 3,178 0
US 85:At Weld CR 6(N/O Brighton)
04 UF5054 085C 0.3 Weld COOT REGION 4 Safety-Roadway
F NH 0 104 436 540 0 0
S SHF 0 21 88 109 0 0
Total 0 125 524 649 0 0
Oth Reg Prios SUBTOTAL- 15,934 2,287 2,215 20.436 20.988 125,670
Rest Area
New I-76 Rest Area(Wiggins)
04 UF682 076A 0.0 Morgan CDOT REGION 4 Rest Area or Info Center
F NH 3,444 0 0 3,444 0 0
S SHF 691 0 0 691 0 0
Total 4,135 0 0 4,135 0 0
Rest Area SUBTOTAL- 4.135 0 0 4,135 0 0
Upper Front Range TOTAL- 23,610 9,033 3,100 35,743 23,593 128,953
Page 75 of 89
Project Priority Programming
Process (PPPP)
,
Noma 2
Colorado p
Project Priority
Programming Process,
(Also Known as the County Hearing Process)
August 18, 1994
Approved August 18, 1994
by the
Colorado Transportation Commission
Prepared by the
Colorado Department of Transportation
Office of Financial Mgmt. and Budget
Resolution for Adoption of the
Project Priority Programming Process
(Also Known as the •County Hearing Process')
WHEREAS, Section 43-1-106 (8) (a) C.R.S. requires the Transportation Commission
"to formulate the general policy with respect to the management, construction,
and maintenance of public highways and other transportation systems in the state
and, in that capacity, to receive delegations, including county commissioners
and municipal officials interested therein; " and
WHEREAS, Section 43-1-106 (8) (i) C.R.S. requires the Transportation Commission
"to act as consultants and to provide services and information, to the boards of
county commissioners, which in the discretion of the Commission are deemed
beneficial to the state of Colorado. Such duty shall include the establishment
of a formal hearing process for the boards of county commissioners;" and
WHEREAS, Section 43-2-111 (5) C.R.S. states that "at least once each year the
Department of Transportation shall hold a meeting for the express purpose of
exchanging information with representatives of the counties relating to highway
construction ana maintenance"; and
WHEREAS, the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of
1991 requires a process through which Colorado citizens can develop a
fundamental understanding of the state's transportation system, its condition,
its cost and funding requirements, and its planning and programming process and
can provide input on key transportation system decision at a meaningful time in
the planning project development process; and
WHEREAS, the Project Priority Programming Process provides for public
involvement and participation as outlined in the Colorado Department of
Transportation Public Involvement and Participation Guidelines.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Colorado Transportation Commission hereby
adopts the Project Priority Programming Process as outlined in Attachment A.
Colorado Department of Transportation
Project Priority Programmin Process
(Also known as the "County Hearing Process")
Approved August 18, 1994
by the Colorado Transportation Commission
As required by Colorado State statutes (Section 43-2-111(5)), for the past several years, the
Colorado Transportation Commission and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)
has held annual hearings with delegations from each county choosing to participate! in order to
formulate the general policy with respect to the management, construction, and maintenance of
Colorado's public highways and to receive that county's priorities relative to project requests
for the development of the Department's Five Year Plan. This process, known as the County
Hearing Process", provided the Transportation Commission a forum for hearing the requests of
each county and was the primary process for input into the project selection and priority
process.
With the sage of the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and
the State ent of Transportation legislation in 1991 came several new requirements
concerning a public participation in this project selection and priority process. Given these
new rNuirements the Transportation Commission, in cooperation with the Colorado Counties
Inc. (CCI) and the Colorado Municipal League (CML), and the Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs), have revised this process as outlined below and illustrated in the
"Project Priority Programming Process" flow chart (Attachment A). This process, which was
adopted by the Transportation Commission at their August 18, 1994 meeting and will be
utilized starting in the fall of 1994.
A. Countywide meetings, with individual Transportation
Commissioner.
The process will begin in August or early September of each year with the determination
by the local entities in each county as to whether or not a countywide meeting will be held
with the individual Transportation Commissioner (Attachment B) and/or Regional
Transportation Director (Attachment C). This meeting is optional and will be a work
session with county and municipal officials, appropriate MPO and the public at large to
discuss project status, priorities, and proposed revisions to the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program and/or Long Range Transportation Plan.
The CDOT Office of Financial Management & Budget (OFMB) will provide the latest
financial information including project revenues and the CDOT Division of Transportation
Development will provide the latest available traffic and roadway condition information to
the Transportation Commissioners and the Regional Transportation Directors for their use
at these meetings.
B. Develop or re-evaluate the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) by Transportation Planning
Region (TPR) and/or Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO):
From September through May of each year, a meeting(s) within each Transportation
Planning Region (TPR), Attachment D, will be held with the county and municipal
officials, State Transportation Commissioner(s) and Regional Transportation Directors(s)
of the individual TPR, public and other interested individuals and organizations to re-
evaluate the Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) for each TPR.
Project Priority Programming Process
(Also known as the "County Hearing ess")
Approved August 18, 1994
by the Colorado Transportation Commission
Page 2
Regardless of whether an individual county meeting is held as outlined in Step A, the
appropriate State Transportation Commissioner(s) and Regional Transportation Director(s)
must attend these TPR meetings. In the TPRs which incorporate a Metropolitan Planning
Organization (1vIPO), these meetings will be coordinated with the MPO Planning Process,
to ensure consistency in the process and to avoid duplication.
The purpose of these meetings is to develop, review and update the regional TIP. These
meetings will also include a review of the current STH' and consider requests for new
projects for the out years of the TIP and S lIP. The request for new projects can be on an
annual basis or every two years at the discretion of the TPR. If the request for new
projects is on a two year basis this step in the process will be limited to review, update
and amendments to the existing TIP.
At this time, all TPR representatives will attempt to reach a consensus with the
Transportation Commission(s) and Regional Transportation Director(s) relative to selection
and priorities of those projects which the TPR wishes to present to the full Transportation
Commission for incorporation into the STIP.
It is felt that the TPR meetings will provide several opportunities for improved
communication. On one hand, the individual counties and municipalities within a
particular TPR will receive an opportunity to learn more about the transportation needs of
the entire TPR, as well as to work together in determining the TPR's overall priorities..
Also, these TPR meetings will provide an excellent opportunity for individual legislators
representing those counties and municipalities within the TPR to meet with the local
officials, Transportation Commissioner(s) and CDOT staff to learn first hand of the
specifics of the transportation needs within their jurisdictions.
The CDOT Office of Financial Management & Budget (OFMB) will provide the latest
financial information including project revenues and the CDOT Division of Transportation
Development will provide the latest available traffic and roadway condition information to
the Transportation Commissioners and the Regional Transportation Directors for their use
at these meetings.
C. Draft Regional Transportation Improvement Program
The result of the meetings outlined in Step B, and any other appropriate project selection
processes such as those for Off-System Bridge, Safety, Transit and the MPO proem, will
be a draft TIP for each of the TPRs, which will be available for review and comment
through public meetings in the various TPRs, by the Statewide Transportation Advisory
Committee (STAC), county, municipal and state officials and the public at large.
For those areas which contain a MPO (Denver/Boulder/Longmont, Colorado Springs,
Pueblo, Grand Junction. and Fort Collins/Greeley), the MPO will take the lead in the
development of the TIP for the urbanized area and the TIP developed through the MPO
prorns will be reflected in the draft Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP). For the areas within a TPR but outside the MPO urbanized boundaries, CDOT
will take the lead in the development of the program for that area in cooperation with the
appropriate MPO.
Project Priority Programming Process
Also known as the "County HearingProcess")
Approved August 18, 1994
by the Colorado Transportation Commission
Page 3
D. Is Draft Transportation Improvement Program
Consistent with the Statewide Plan and Financially
Constrained?
From April through May the CDOT staff from the Region offices and the Division of
Transportation Development will work with the representatives of the TPR to determine if
the draft TIP is consistent with the adopted Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan. In
addition the CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget (OFMB) will work with
the Region staff and the TPR representatives to determine if the draft TIP is financially
constrained as required by the ISTEA legislation.
If it is determined that the draft TIP is consistent with the Statewide Long Range
Transportation Plan and it is financially constrained, the OFMB will incorporate it into the
draft Sf11'. If it is determined that the draft TIP is not consistent with the Statewide Long
Range Transportation Plan, the draft TIP can be amended by returning to Step B and
making the nerrccary revisions or the TPR can pursue trying to get a change in the
adopted Statewide Long Range Plan through the long range planning process.
However, if the option to change the long range plan is pursued, those projects which are
not consistent with the long range plan cannot be part of theSTIP until such amendments
to the long range plan have been approved. If it is determined that the draft TIP is not
fiscally constrained, CDOT region staff and staff from OFMB will work with the TPR to
make the necessary adjustments such that it is fiscally constrained. A draft TIP which is
not fiscally constrained cannot become part of the draft STIR
E. Draft Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
The result of Step D is a draft Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
The CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget (OFMB), working with the TPR,
CDOT regional staff and CDOT planning staff, is responsible for producing the draft
STIP prior to the end of May. Included as part of the draft STIP will be a summary for
each TPR which identifies the following when compared to the current approved STIP:
1. Projects which are recommended to be deleted.
2. Projects which are recommended to be delayed.
3. Projects recommended to be added which are consistent with the approved
Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan.
4. Projects recommended to be added which are not consistent with the approved
Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan.
5. Other changes in project programming, funding, priority etc.
6. Major issues/ comments identified during the development of the draft STIP.
Project Priority Programming Process
Also known as the "County HearingProcess")
Approved August 18, 1994
by the Colorado Transportation Commission
Page 4
In those TPRs which contain an MPO the STIP will be broken into two parts. The first
part will contain the draft TIP for the urbanized area as developed through the appropriate
MPO process. The second part will contain the program for the area outside the
urbanized area but still within the TPR boundary.
F. Transportation Commission's Statewide meeting on the
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
In May of each year, following the TPR meetings, the Colorado Transportation
Commission will hold a Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) meeting.
The draft TIP for each TPR will be presented, by the appropriate CDOT Regional
Transportation Director, to the Transportation Commission. Included in this presentation
will be a summary of the major changes in project programming, selection, priority etc. as
well as an overview of the major issues or concerns which were identified during the
development of the draft TIP.
Following this brief presentation by the Regional Transportation Director, comments on
the draft STIP for that particular TPR will be made by members of the Statewide
Transportation Advisory Committee (STAC), TPRs, MPOs, and/or any citizen interested
in Colorado's transportation system.
This meeting must be held in a facility large enough to allow for the attendance of all
county and municipal representatives desinng to attend. Also, members of the
Transportation Legislation Review Committee and the House and Senate Transportation
Committees will be invited to attend, along with interested members of the general public
and the press. Day-long attendance will be urged in order to broaden perspectives relating
to the State's transportation needs.
At this meeting, as appropriate, the Department will have displays and staff available to
explain information relating to its funding allocation processes, the condition and needs of
the transportation system, and various other Department programs.
Following this meeting the draft STIP will be revised per the direction of the
Transportation Commission and submitted for a 30 day review and comment period.
G. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) boards
adopts final MPO-TIPs
Metropolitan Planning Organization boards need to adopt their TIPs between June and July
in order to meet the Project Priority Programming Process schedule. MPOs which are
air quality non-attainment areas must complete an acceptable air quality conformance
analysis by the third Thursday of July of the year a new TIP is being adopted. All MPOs
must have the Governor's approval of their TIPs by the third Thursday of July such that
they can be incorporated into the STIP for adoption by the Transportation Commission in
July. Upon approval of the TIP by the MPO and the Governor for an urbanized area, the
approved TIP will be incorporated into the STIP.
Project Priority Programming Process
(Also known as the "County Hearing Process")
Approved August 18, 1994
by the Colorado Transportation Commission
Page 5
H. Transportation Commission Adopts Final STIP
In July all comments received on the draft STIP during the 30 day review and comment
period (Step F) will be presented to the Transportation Commission for their consideration
prior to their adoption of the STIP. In addition, any party wishing to appear before the
Transportation Commission to express their concerns or comments on the draft STIP will
be afforded that opportunity at the July meeting.
Once the STIP is approved by the Transportation Commission it will be submitted to
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Authority (FCA) for
their joint approval by September 15th. Following approval of the STIP by FHWA and
FTA, copies of the approved STIP will be mailed to county and municipal officials,
TPRs/MPOs,_appropnate CDOT staff and members of the public that participated in the
process.
If a TIP for an urbanized area has not been approved by the MPO, the air quality
conformity process and approved by the Governor, the latest draft TIP for that urbanized
area will be included in the STIP. Upon approval of the urbanized area TIP by the
Governor, that approved TIP will automatically become part of the current STIP for that
urbanized area.
All other amendments to the STIP will follow the amendment prerecs as outlined in the
STIP document in coordination with the MPO process as nerpccary_
rroject rriorny rwwcga ra t iiiy leitJUCbb
(Also known as the "County Hearing Process")
August 18, 1994
A B C D E F G H
OPTIONAL
Develop Is Draft TIP Transportation MPO Transportation
Countywide or e Consistent YES Drell Commission's Boards Commission
Mtgs.with 1 Re-evaluate I-3► with ��' STIP r-0. Sletewlds / Adopts —i• Adopts
Individual Regional TIP SW Plan& Meeting Final Final
Tansportelbn by TPRIMPO Fiscally on the MPO-TIP, STIP
;ommlesloner Region Constrained? STIP
.ocal entitles option - Request nor Prefects - TPRIMPO Pubtio NO -Present Regional TiP. .Connors Approval -Final Hearing
o have Individual on en Annual Meetings to Revise by TPR or MPO-TIPs
it regional meeting or 2 year bails and Corm'ent on -Final STIP
tr eliminate Cram TIP -Present comments by . AO Contemns
•Develop.review& Public.STAG&others findings for •Submit STIP to FIANA
nitlal dissimilate update Regional TIP Amend Amend nonanainrnent end FTA for approval
on protect status. Draft Statewide sews
priorities etc. •Consider amendment. Regional TIP Plan
lock session with -Review of the STIP
owls/city/public I
- Review&comment
by STAG
Long Range
•If Step A it not held a Planning
Transportation Commissioner Process
will anew Regions Mtg.
4
a a ■ t ■ . a
Public Participation Process n
1 Y IF V 1 V V
're - Dec Sept - May Apr - May May May Jun - Jul July
i,ITc-M 1111114 Attachment A
COMMISSION DISTRICTS
WYOMING . HtDRASKA '
j --- — 1
i MOFFAT
ROUTi ],LOGAN?JACKSON"\cLARIMER PMILLIPSj iinA,
L._._._._._._._._._.-_._. _._. MORGAN
i i
i RIO BLANCO oRANo OUL I YUMA
1
1 I OL,`N 1 ADAMS WASHINGTON
�� CLEAR
! GARFIELD 7 EAGLE CREEK 2A'ARAPAHOE — _•_•r•___-_._._._.1
UnMI
JE 'FE ON3 1
1 C( ELBERT KIT CARSON
PITKIN !LANE QUGLAs 11
! MESA r PARK !
i /' 1 �! + TEL ER
! DELTA i 9 EL PASO CHEYENNE ! °�
4 1 GUNNISON CNAFFE _ _,_,—,1Z — li _.—._.LINCOLN i tS71
_i
\!\ FREMONT KIOWA 1
1 MONTROSE
i •+ CROWLEi ._._.-._.�
OURAT CUSTER _
i PUEBLO
SAN MICUEL NINSOALE SACUACHE ^� !
t
t----------\
• 7L 10 PROWERS i
.� , �' 0TER0
DOLORES ' SAN L._._ _ T BENT i
1 _- - JUAN HINERA HUERFANO / ' �
V-- - - ------ .—•_•'-8 RID ORANGE ALAMOS 1 •1— _. 1
! MONTEZUMAr.
—�Ir —.
i /LA ntATA , - - t CONEJOS oOSTILLA •07. LAS ANIMAS BACA I
ARCHULETA !
N
Attachment B NETT
i OKLAHOMA
ENGINEERING DISTRICTS
WYOMING NEBRASKA
1 `� SEDCWICK :
_I
I
ROUTT WELD LOGAN HOFFAT ?JACKSO\ RE PHILLIPS I: �h�-3\��'•;
- i
I'.-----•- --• - _______.- M O R G A N I
GRAND 1
i RIO BLANCO 3 OULDER _ YUMA i__„
i '\ ADAMS WASHINGTON
-•�._._r------•-•� CLEAR ARAPAHOE .--,
GARFIELD EAGLE CREEK - - - - _ - 1
GMM�Tf'
-._._._._._.._._.--_._._- JE'FER ON
----•----r•� -I KIT CARSON i
i ELBERT
�
A PItKIN LAKE PARK OUCLAS 1 i
r
! MESA .�f - -•_ - - - -
'•j >N�/ CTELLER -1
i
i_
_ _
DELTA [. EL PASO CHEYENNE . a
LINCOLN p
---"------ GUNNISON N N I S O N HAFFE F F E LL - - ;
i MONTROSE -
REMONT -----• KIOWA !
CROWLET 1
_.-.-._. -' l
7 -•-•-.- CUSTER PUEBLO - r,
I
• SAN MIGUEL `..,. HINSDALE SAGUACHE f !
L-''-•---'-• ow—% „✓ \. PROW E R S 5DOLORES /SAN OTERO BENT
---------- JUAN �ti I N E R n.i .---•—• •
�7- .- .----- !
4 HUERFANO _ _ ._2.. -
TRIO GRANDE ALAMOSA
�_--_. ( / i
! MONTEZUMA l -1_. /--' 2
ref-
PLATA COST ILLA LAS ANIMAS BACA
nur In
:ARCHULETA
7 Attachment C NEW ILCOC0 OKLAHOMA
•
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REGIONS
I
Hof rot� Routh Ll--\ Jackson Carlmer I held Logan � Sedgwick ni
I /` UPPER FRONT I _ -�J
NORTH : \I RANGE i Phillips NORTHWEST I J ERONE
1 ,^ / RANGE i Morgan — —
I I "`^ - � / - I g Washington Yuma
-- - - — - — - — - —I - - - GrandRio Blanco i Boulder
II le
r 3r1nth- - - GREATER Adams i
\ Iear` c DENVER AREA,nf —.
i Eagle _ EASTERN
Garfield I
I
reek 4 r Aropohoe
INTERMOUNTAIN rsummi t, — — I
- — - "ark '
Douglas Elbert Lincoln i
—1—K I i Carson
Mesa Pahl,' !
GRAND f lake CENTRAL I I _ _ _
JUNCTION I Gunnison FRONT •aso —
Del to RANGE Cheyenne
i i PIKES — '
Chaffee _ _1TelI PEAK
IGUNNISON — z _ _ AREA
Montrose i VALLEY Fremont ,
r klowo
IPueblo Crowley i
__ Saguoche - -
San Mi vet - lay SAN LUIS Custer PUEBLO _ , _ ; I Bent Provers
Miguel - . Ilinsdale ll VALLEY AREA Otero
Dolores Sal Hinerall� —
Juan i _ _ Ifuer faro
i -�—i / —
I Rio Grade I Alamono
Montezuma I La PlatoI
Las Animas Boca_ _ _ _ _ ,
SOUTHWEST _ - - -(Costllla - -
"I„'Ieta r.ane; I SOUTH CENTRAL SOUTHEAST
I )
At1.achment D
Amendment Guidelines
tmnan AI een•mm.+ Avan TTP/QTTP Amnnrlmnn+ Prnrncc *
nil L. 11 vita t Lai liliaGllt Al t.a 111 /U 111 Alla\.nYlaa.ela Process
AA AB AC ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
AK
CDOT
MPO-TIP DTD/OFMB MPO-TIP MPO-TIP CDOT Governor's CDOT FHWA/FTA/EPA
Amendment ® Policy CDOT-Reglon Public Approval DTD Approval STIP Approval
—sr-Request To Amendment a •ES a Participation a CDOH•APCD a CDOT-Region a a Administrative iv-
t, MPO it Quality Pro' DOH•APCD Review OFMB Amendment
Amendment
Project ® MPO-TIP CDOT MPO-TIP MPO-TIP CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Approved Request & e Policy a DTD a Public a Approval a DTD STIP a Quarterly
TIP/STIP a. From ► Amendment CDOT-Region Participation CDOT-Region Administrative Review
City. Consistent OFMB OFMB Amendment
County,and With
Others Statewide Long ® MPO-TIP CDOT • MPO-TIP CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Range Plan ► Administrative ally DTD Approval a DTD I STIP a Quarterly
Amendment COOT-Region CDOT-Region Administrative Review
t , OFMB OFMB Amendment
No
Amend Revise
Statewide Long No Amendment
Range Plan So It Is AD • Greater Denver Area.North Front Range,and Pikes Peak Area
t—
I MPO/CDOT Consistent '
MPO Attainment Area TIP/STIP Amendment Process *
8A BB BC BD BE BF BC CD BI BJ 8
Amendment
Request To
MPO
-- - Amendment _
Project ® MPO-TIP CDOT MPO-TIP MPO-TIP CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Approved Request & —► Policy a DID �a Public a Approval .6- DTD • STIP a Quarterly 1
TIP/STIP av From —► Amendment COOT-Region Participation CDOT-Region Administrative Review
City. Consistent OFMB OPMB Amendment
County,and With
Others Statewide Long ® MPO•TIP } I CDOT I MPO-TIP I CDOT I CDOT FHWA/FTA '
l Range Plan — or Administrative a DTD Approval a DTD STIP a Quarterly
Amendment CDOT-Reglon CDOT-Region Administrative Review
OFMB OFMB Amendment
No
Amend n Revise
j Smmwtde Long t No ! Amendment
°nngr Ply Sclt!- --.._ - Bpi • °•.trFtr, r,.ana mmmm.
' MPO/COOT j l Comi•tent j `i
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Nonattainment Area TIP/STIP Amendment Process
MPO Nonattainment Areas
MPO Nonattainment Areas are those MPO areas that are considered to have air quality below the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) health standards as set forth in the Clean Air Act. These areas include the Greater Denver Area MPO, the Pikes
Peak Area MPO and the North Front Range Area MPO.
AA-AB. Approved MPO TIP/STIP and Amendment Project Request
Following approval of the MPO Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) and the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), amendments to the final approved MPO TIP/STIP may be requested by the city,
county or others. These requests must be submitted to the MPO.
AC-AD. Amendment Request to MPO and Determination of Amendment Status
Once the request for an amendment to the approved MPO TIP/STIP is submitted to the MPO, the type of amendment
required is determined. If the proposed amendment impacts a project in a MPO nonattainment area and is
determined to affect air quality, it must be done as a MPO TIP Policy Amendment with the Governor's approval.
This air quality impact determination is made by the MPO based on recommendations from the Colorado Department
of Health (CDOH) - Air Pollution Control Division (APCD). If the proposed amendment impacts a project in a
MPO nonattainment area, but does not affect air quality, it can either be done as a MPO TIP Policy Amendment or a
MPO TIP Administrative Amendment, based on the MPO TIP Amendment Rules. The proposed amendment must be
financially constrained and consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. If the proposed amendment is not
consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan, the amendment must be dropped or changed to be consistent with the
Statewide Long Range Plan. Otherwise, the amendment can only be resubmitted when the Statewide Long Range
Plan is amended by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Division of Transportation Development
(DTD), following the appropriate amendment process.
AE. Draft MPO TIP Amendment Distribution
The MPO produces a Draft MPO TIP amendment, and simultaneously sends a copy of the Draft MPO TIP
amendment to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and the CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget
(OFMB) for review and concurrence. If the Draft MPO TIP amendment impacts a project in a MPO nonattainment
area and is determined to affect air quality, then the MPO also sends a copy to the CDOT Office of Environmental
Services (OES) and the CDOH-APCD. Each of these parties only receives one copy from the MPO, so it is their
responsibility to make sure that any other interested parties receive a copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment.
OFMB must make sure the Draft MPO TIP amendment is financially constrained and DTD must make sure it is
consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. The CDOT Transportation Region is responsible for coordinating
any comments and recommendations from these parties and forwarding them to the MPO.
AF-AK. MPO TIP/STIP Amendment Approval
MPO TIP Policy Amendment - Air Quality ProJect/CDOT STIP Administrative Amendment
Any MPO TIP Policy Amendment impacting a project in a MPO nonattainment area that affect air quality must be
approved by the Governor. The proposed amendment must meet the Governor's criteria (see the section on the
Governor's TIP Approval Criteria). The project(s) being amended must be in a conforming MPO TIP or
Grandfathered or Exempt. Prior to the Governor's approval, the proposed amendment must go through the MPO
public participation process in order to allow the public to review and comment on the amendment. This is necessary
for all MPO TIP Policy Amendments. After the proposed amendment has gone through this MPO public
participation process, it must be reviewed by the CDOH-APCD. Then the Draft MPO TIP amendment is approved
by the MPO and sent simultaneously to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB for review and comment.
DTD coordinates the comments and recommendations and forwards them, along with the Draft MPO TIP
amendment, to the Governor for approval. The MPO TIP Policy Amendment with the Governor's approval is then
submitted to OFMB for incorporation into the STIP as a STIP Administrative Amendment. OFMB will act on the
amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working days from the time that the amendment is received. This STIP
Administrative Amendment must then be approved jointly by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and EPA. OFMB will then send a copy of the STIP amendment to the
appropriate MPO, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the Colorado
Municipal League (CML) and Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI). Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP
Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate
STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly amendments, to each of the MPOs, CDOT Transportation
Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and CCI.
MPO TIP Policy Amendment/CDOT STIP Administrative Amendment
MPO TIP Policy Amendments must go through the MPO public participation process in order to allow the public to
review and comment on the proposed amendments. The MPO has the authority to approve the MPO TIP Policy
Amendment after the MPO public participation process. A copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment is then
simultaneously submitted to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB for review and comment. The
CDOT Transportation Region coordinates the comments and recommendations and forwards them to the MPO. The
approved MPO TIP Policy Amendment is then submitted to CDOT for approval and incorporation into the STIP as a
STIP Administrative Amendment. OFMB will act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working days from
the time the amendment is received. OFMB will send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to FHWA for
highway projects, or FTA for Transit projects, or both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two.
Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy to the appropriate MPO, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region
and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following
the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly
amendments, to each of the MPOs, CDOT Transportation Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and
CCI.
MP" TIP Administrative Amendment/CDOT CTIP Adminictrativa Amendment
MPO TIP Administrative Amendments must be approved by the MPO. A copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment is
then simultaneously submitted to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB for review and comment. The
CDOT Transportation Region coordinates the comments and recommendations and forwards them to the MPO. The
approved MPO TIP Administrative Amendment is then submitted to CDOT for approval and incorporation into the
STIP as a STIP Administrative Amendment. OFMB will act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working
days from the time the amendment is received. OFMB will send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to
FHWA for highway projects, or FTA for Transit projects, or both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two.
Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy to the appropriate MPO, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region
and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following
the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly
amendments, to each of the MPOs, CDOT Transportation Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and
CCT
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Attainment Area TIP/STIP Amendment Process
MPO Attainment Areas
MPO Attainment Areas are those MPO areas that are considered to have air quality at least as good as the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) health standards as set forth in the Clean Air Act. These areas include the Pueblo MPO and the Grand
Junction MPO.
•
BA-BB. Approved MPO TIP/STIP and Amendment Project Request
Following approval of the MPO Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) and the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), amendments to the final approved MPO TIP/STIP may be requested by the city,
county or others. These requests must be submitted to the MPO.
BC-BD. Amendment Request to MPO and Determination of Amendment Status
Once the request for an amendment to the approved MPO TIP/STIP is submitted to the MPO, the type of amendment
required is determined to be either a MPO TIP Policy Amendment or a MPO TIP Administrative Amendment, based
on the MPO TIP Amendment Rules. The proposed amendment.must be financially constrained and consistent with
the Statewide Long Range Plan. If the proposed amendment is not consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan,
the amendment must be dropped or changed to be consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. Otherwise, the
amendment can only be resubmitted when the Statewide Long Range Plan is amended by the Colorado Department
of Transportation (CDOT) Division of Transportation Development (DTD), following the appropriate amendment
process.
BE. Draft MPO TIP Amendment Distribution
The MPO produces a Draft MPO TIP amendment and simultaneously sends a copy of the Draft MPO TIP
amendment to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and the CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget
(OFMB) for review and concurrence. Each of these parties only receives one copy from the MPO, so it is their
responsibility to make sure that any other interested parties receive a copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment.
OFMB must make sure the Draft MPO TIP amendment is financially constrained and DTD must make sure it is
consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. The CDOT Transportation Region is responsible for coordinating
any comments and recommendations from these parties and forwarding them to the MPO.
BP-BK. MPO TIP/STIP Amendment Approval
MPO TIP Policy Amendment/CDOT STIP Administrative Amendment
MPO TIP Policy Amendments must go through the MPO public participation process in order to allow the public to
review and comment on the proposed amendments. The MPO has the authority to approve the MPO TIP Policy
Amendment after the MPO public participation process. A copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment is then
simultaneously submitted to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB for review and comment. The
CDOT Transportation Region coordinates the comments and recommendations and forwards them to the MPO. The
approved MPO TIP Policy Amendment is then submitted to CDOT for approval and incorporation into the STIP as a
STIP Administrative Amendment. OFMB will act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working days from
the time the amendment is received. OFMB will send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) for highway projects, or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for Transit .
projects, or both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two. Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy
the appropriate MPO, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the
STIP Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following the quarterly review, OFMB will send the
appropriate STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly amendments, to each of the MPOs, CDOT
Transportation Regions, DTD, the CDOT Office of Environmental Services (OES), the Colorado Department of
Health (CDOH) - Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), the Colorado Municipal League (CML) and Colorado
Counties, Inc. (CCI).
MPO TIP Administrative Amendment/CDOT STIP Administrative Amendment
MPO TIP Administrative Amendments must be approved by the MPO. A copy of the Draft MPO TIP amendment is
then simultaneously submitted to DTD, the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB for review and comment. The
CDOT Transportation Region coordinates the comments and recommendations and forwards them to the MPO. The
approved MPO TIP Administrative Amendment is then submitted to CDOT for approval and incorporation into the
STIP as a STIP Administrative Amendment. OFMB will act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working
days from the time the amendment is received. CHAR will send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to
FHWA for highway projects, or FTA for Transit projects, or both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two.
Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy to the appropriate MPO, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region
and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following
the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly
amendments, to each of the MPOs, CDOT Transportation Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and
CCI.
Rural Nonattainment Area STIP Amendment Process *
I CAI ICHI (CM re-D) ei vF CG Eli) CI CJ
CDOT
DTD/OFMB
CDOT-Reglon CDOT-Reglon OES CDOT CDOT CDOT a FHWA/FTA
Amendment ® Policy Amend. OES Review Public TC STIP Approval
L Request To 1 Air Quality Proj.i TPR i CDOH-APCD e. Participation .e. Approval i Policy a.
_ CDOT-Reglon PM 10 CDOH-APCD Review Amendment
Amendment
Project Ye CDOT-Reglon CDOT CDOT CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Approved Request & ♦ Polcy i CDOT-Region ► Public * TC i STIP i Approval
STIP * From --I. Amendment DTDIOEMB Participation Approval Policy
City. Consistent TPR t Amendment
County,and With
Others Statewide Long Ye CDOT-Reglon CDOT CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Range Plan —► Administrative i CDOT-Reglon OFMB STIP ► Quarterly
Amendment DTD/OFMB - Approval• Administntive Review
TPR Amendment
No
Amend Revise
Statewide Long ICD Amendment
Range Plan So It Is — is) • Aspen,Canon City.Lamar,Psgosa Springs,Steamboat Springs,and Telluride
TPR/CDOT Confluent
Rural Attainment Area STIP Amendment Process *
Amendment
Request To
CDOT-Reglon
Amendment
Project Ye CDOT-Reglon CDOT CDOT CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Approved Request & a. Policy *CDOT-Reglon I Public i TC i STIP ► Approval
STIP e. From —* Amendment DTD/OFMB Participation Approval Policy
City. Consistent TPR Amendment
County,and With
I Others Statewide Long Ye CDOT-Region CDOT 1 CDOT CDOT FHWA/FTA
Range Plan —► Administrative s CDOT-Reglon OFMB i STIP + Quarterly
Amendment DTD/OFMB . Approval Administrative Review
TPR Amendment
No
Omen' I Revise
IStatewide Longl (Ni) I Amendment Yes
I Range Plan 'r I So It Is OD • Central Front Range,Eastern,Gunnison Valley,Intermountain,North West,San Luis Valley,
TPR/CDOT . I Consistent South Lennat.South East,South West,and Upper Huns Range
Rural Nonattainment Area STIP Amendment Process
Rural Nonattainment Areas
Rural Nonattainment Areas are those Rural areas that are considered to have air quality, PM-10, below the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) health standards as set forth in the Clean Air Act. These areas include Aspen, Canon City, Lamar,
Pagosa Springs, Steamboat Springs and Telluride.
CA-CB. Approved STIP and Amendment Project Request
Following the approval of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) by the Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT) Transportation Commission, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), amendments to the final approved STIP may be requested by the city, county or others.
This request must be submitted to the CDOT Transportation Region.
CC-CD. Amendment Request to CDOT Transportation Region and Determination of Amendment
Status
Once the request for an amendment to the approved STIP is submitted to the CDOT Transportation Region, the type
of amendment required is determined. If the proposed amendment impacts a project in a Rural nonattainment area
and is determined to affect air quality, it must be done as a STIP Policy Amendment with the CDOT Transportation
Commission's approval. This air quality impact determination is made by the CDOT Transportation Region based on
recommendations from the CDOT Office of Environmental Services (OES). If the proposed amendment impacts a
project in a Rural nonattainment area, but does not affect air quality, it can either be done as a STIP Policy
Amendment or a STIP Administrative Amendment, based on the STIP Amendment Rules. The proposed amendment
must be financially constrained and consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. If the proposed amendment is
not consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan, the amendment must be dropped or changed to be consistent with
the Statewide Long Range Plan, Otherwise, the amendment can only be resubmitted when the Statewide Long Range
Plan is amended by the CDOT Division of Transportation Development (DTD), following the appropriate amendment
process.
CE. Draft STIP Amendment Distribution
The CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget (OFMB) produces a Draft STIP amendment and
simultaneously sends a copy of the Draft STIP amendment to DTD, the Transportation Planning Regions (TPR) and
the CDOT Transportation Region for review and concurrence. If the Draft STIP amendment impacts a project in a
Rural nonattainment area and is determined to affect air quality, then OFMB also sends a copy to OES and the
Colorado Department of Health (CDOH) - Air Pollution Control Division (APCD). Each of these parties only
receives one copy from OFMB, so it is their responsibility to make sure that any other interested parties receive a
copy of the Draft STIP amendment. OFMB must make sure the Draft STIP amendment is financially constrained
and DTD must make sure it is consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. The CDOT Transportation Region is
responsible for coordinating any comments and recommendations from these parties and forwarding them to OFMB.
CF-CJ. Rural STIP Amendment Approval
Rural STIP Policy Amendment - Air Quality Project
Rural STIP Policy Amendments impacting a project in a Rural nonattainment area that affect air quality must be
approved by the CDOT Transportation Commission. Prior to the CDOT Transportation Commission's approval the
proposed amendment must be reviewed by OES and it must go through the CDOT public participation process. The
CDOT public participation process is implemented in order to allow the public to review and comment on the
amendment and is necessary for all STIP Policy Amendments. After the proposed amendment has been reviewed by
OES and has gone through the CDOT public participation process, the Draft STIP amendment is sent to the CDOT
Transportation Commission for approval, along with any comments or recommendations. Following approval by the
CDOT Transportation Commission, the STIP Policy Amendment must be approved by FHWA and FTA. STIP
Policy amendments are done twice a year. OFMB will then send a copy of the STIP Policy Amendment to the
appropriate TPR, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the Colorado
Municipal League (CML) and Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI).
Rural STIP Policy Amendment
Rural STIP Policy Amendments must go through the CDOT public participation process in order to allow the public
to review and comment on the amendments. OFMB then submits the Draft STIP amendment, along with any
comments or recommendations. to the CDOT Transportation Commission for approval. Following approval by the
CDOT Transportation Commission, the STIP Policy Amendments must be approved by FHWA and FTA. STIP
Policy amend, .eats are done trice a yea . OFMB ttAll then send a copy of the STIP Policy Amendment to the
appropriate TPR, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and CCI.
Rural STIP Administrative Amendment
Rural STIP Administrative Amendments must be approved by OFMB and can be submitted as needed. OFMB will
act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working days from the time the amendment is received. OFMB will
send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to FHWA for highway projects, or FTA for Transit projects, or
both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two. Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy to the
appropriate TPR, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP
Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate
STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly amendments, to each of the TPRs, CDOT Transportation
Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD, the CML and CCI.
Rural Attainment Area STIP Amendment Process
Rural Attainment Areas
Rural Attainment Areas are those Rural areas that are considered to have air quality, PM-10, at least as good as the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) health standards as set forth in the Clean Air Act. These areas include the following
Transportation Planning Regions (TPR): Central Front Range, Eastern, Gunnison Valley, Intermountain, North West, San Luis
Valley, South Central, South East, South West and Upper Front Range.
DA-DB. Approved STIP and Amendment Project Request
Following the approval of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) by the Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT) Transportation Commission, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), amendments to the final approved STIP may be requested by the city, county or others.
This request must be submitted to the CDOT Transportation Region.
DC-DD. Amendment Request to CDOT Transportation Region and Determination of Amendment
Status
Once the request for an amendment to the approved STIP is submitted to the CDOT Transportation Region, the type
of amendment required is determined to be a STIP Policy Amendment or a STIP Administrative Amendment, based
on the STIP Amendment Rules. The proposed amendment must be financially constrained and consistent with the
Statewide Long Range Plan. If the proposed amendment is not consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan, the
amendment must be dropped or changed to be consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. Otherwise, the
amendment can only be resubmitted when the Statewide Long Range Plan is amended by the CDOT Division of
Transportation Development (DTD), following the appropriate amendment process.
DE. Draft STIP Amendment Distribution •
The CDOT Office of Financial Management and Budget (OFMB) produces a Draft STIP amendment and
simultaneously sends a copy of the Draft STIP amendment to DTD, the Transportation Planning Regions (TPR) and
the CDOT Transportation Region for review and concurrence. Each of these parties only receives one copy from
OFMB, so it is their responsibility to make sure that any other interested parties receive a copy of the Draft STIP
amendment. OFMB must make sure the Draft STIP amendment is financially constrained and DTD must make sure
it is consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan. The CDOT Transportation Region is responsible for
coordinating any comments and recommendations from these parties and forwarding them to OFMB.
DF-DJ. Rural STIP Amendment Approval
Rural STIP Policy Amendment
Rural STIP Policy Amendments must go through the CDOT public participation process in order to allow the public
to review and comment on the amendments. OFMB then submits the Draft STIP amendment, along with any
comments or recommendations, to the CDOT Transportation Commission for approval. Following approval by the
CDOT Transportation Commission, the STIP Policy Amendments must be approved by FHWA and FTA. STIP
Policy amendments are done twice a year. OFMB then sends a copy of the STIP Policy Amendment to the
appropriate TPR, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region, DTD, the CDOT Office of Environmental Services
(OES), the Colorado Department of Health (CDOH) - Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), the Colorado
Municipal League (CML) and Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI).
Rural STIP Administrative Amendments
Rural STIP Administrative Amendments must be approved by OFMB and can be submitted as needed. OFMB will
act on the amendment and respond within 3 - 5 working days from the time the amendment is received. OFMB will
send a copy of the STIP Administrative Amendment to FHWA for highway projects, or FTA for Transit projects, or
both for joint projects or fund transfers between the two. Simultaneously, OFMB will also send a copy to the
appropriate TPR, the appropriate CDOT Transportation Region and DTD. Quarterly, OFMB reviews all of the STIP
Administrative Amendments with FTA and FHWA. Following the quarterly review, OFMB will send the appropriate
STIP replacement pages, which include all of the quarterly amendments, to each of the TPRs, CDOT Transportation
Regions, DTD, OES, the CDOH-APCD. the CML and CCI
z
w Emi°
v)
� Q �
� W
STIP AMENDMENT RULES
Since any transportation program is dynamic and continuous, regardless how carefully planned, some changes in the program will
be necessary each year as conditions within the state change, actual project expenditures are realized and program policies and
priorities are reviewed and updated. To facilitate this change the following amendment process and schedule for the STIP
amendments will be followed. In addition, as with any program of this nature, emergencies will occur which this process cannot
address. In those instances the necessary changes will be handled on a case by case basis in coordination with the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA),
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs)/ Transportation Planning Regions (TPRs), the CDOT Transportation Regions and ail
other impacted entities.
Prior to approval of a STIP amendment the appropriate MPO and Non-MPO TIP amendments must be made. The Division of
Transportation Development (DTD) of CDOT is responsible for coordinating the appropriate MPO TIP amendment paper flow
order and the CDOT Transportation Regions are responsible for coordinating the Non-MPO TIP amendment paper flow order. By
coordinating the MPO and Non-MPO TIP amendment processes, they ensure that all parties are notified at the right time in order
to take any necessary action. The approval of STIP Administrative Amendments has been delegated to OFMB. (See Flow Chart)
STIP Administrative Amendments
Administrative Amendments to the STIP can be done under the following constraints and limitations, as long as there is no major
change (as determined by the CDOT Transportation Region and OFMB) in the project's location, limits or scope of activities:
• A project that costs less than $500,000 and is not regionally significant can be added or deleted subject to approval of the
project sponsor. The project sponsor may appeal any action regarding this amendment type to the Colorado Transportation
Commission.
• A change can be made that does not cause the overall program fiscal totals to exceed +1-5% of the total funds available,
excluding the Maintenance and Operations program. OFMB will meet quarterly with FTA and FHWA in order to monitor
this limit.
• A project can be moved between the first three years of the current STIP and/or from the last year of the previous year
approved STIP, as long as no projects have been deleted and there are no fiscal impacts.
• The responsible agency can be changed, subject to approval by the original project sponsor
• An MPO TIP Policy Amendment to a project can be done as an Administrative Amendment in the STIP as long as the
project has gone through the appropriate MPO Process. Any MPO TIP amendment to a project with regional significance
in an MPO nonattainment area that affects Air Quality must be done as an MPO TIP Policy Amendment including the
Governor's approval.
• Changes to the Surface Treatment Program (Major, Minor or Routine) can be done as Administrative Amendments in the
STIP, as long as the CDOT Transportation Regions do not exceed their control totals.
STIP Administrative Amendment proposals can be submitted to OFMB as needed. All Administrative Amendments must be
approved by OFMB. OFMB will review the proposed STIP Administrative Amendments and respond within 7 - 10 working days
of the submittal, unless special circumstances demand more time. In this case, OFMB will let the involved parties know that
more time is needed within that 7 - 10 working day period. The CDOT Transportation Regions, MPOs%TPRs, DTD, FTA,
FHWA and all other appropriate entities will also be notified of the proposed amendment within that time period. OFMB will
coordinate all of the administrative changes with FHWA (for highway projects) and FTA (for transit projects) and will meet with
them on a quarterly basis to review the current program status to ensure the necessary adjustments have been made and are within
the fiscal and program limits established by the Colorado Transportation Commission, FHWA and FTA. If the proposed STIP
Administrative Amendment involves a joint (highway and transit) project or a transfer of' funds between the two, both FHWA and
FTA must approve the amendment.
STIP Policy Amendments
Policy Amendments to the STIP are required when the proposed change in a project exceeds the limitations as defined the
previous section on Administrative Amendments.
• All STIP Policy Amendments must be completed prior to the request for a budget action.
• All Policy Amendments require public participation.
• Non-MPO TIP Policy Amendments must be approved by the Colorado Transportation Commission
STIP Policy Amendments will be acted on only twice each year as illustrated in the attached calendar and will be coordinated by
the OFMB with the CDOT Transportation Regions, MPOs/TPRs and DTD and approved by FTA and FHWA. As a part of this
Policy Amendment Process OFMB will also provide the Colorado Transportation Commission with a list of all projects added,
(including
�i_' those done administratively), ll - f t� regarding the STIP
deleted or delayed ;,IhC:U::L'IL-' v.,..., as well a., a list of any C6:TuTiCr ., or issues or any
projects. (See Flow Chart) •
Cr
C
•MO
ime
•!
A
Long Range Plan/STIP Improvement Type Definitions
7T" POT MOBILITY
Any Strategic Project that primarily addresses mobility needs.
7TH POT SAFETY
Any Strategic Project that primarily addresses safety needs.
7Tu POT SYSTEM QUALITY
Any Strategic Project that primarily addresses the preservation of the existing system.
AVIATION MOBILITY
This program is related to the provision of aviation services, both commercial and general aviation, including airfreight.
Hangars -
Snow Removal Equip. -
New Terminals -
Commuter Aviation Service -
General Aviation Service -
New/expanded runways, -
Taxiways, aprons, etc. -
AVIATION SAFETY
This category includes navigational equipment, fire/rescue equipment and lighting/beacons.
Navigational equipment -
Fire and rescue equipment -
Lighting, beacons -
AVIATION STUDIES
This category includes airport waste! plans, airport capital planning. airport plan updates. site planning. etc.
AVAITION SYSTEM QUALITY
Improvements that relate to the maintenance of existing aviation-related facilities, equipment, etc. including pavement maintenance,
storage buildings, fuel tanks, existing hangars, automobile parking, signs, etc.
Runways/taxiways/aprons -
Existing Terminals -
BICYCLE FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS
This category includes provision of on-street and off-street bicycle lanes, trails, paths, trailheads. etc. and includes bicycle-related
programs.
BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM QUALITY
Improvements to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities. such as trails. sidewalks. overpasses. underpasses. maintenance of bicycle
paths, etc.
BRIDGE
Restoration/rehabilitation or replacement of an existing structure.
Bridge Restoration/Rehabilitation - Work required to return an existing bridge deck to a condition of adequate structural
support. Some upgrading of unsafe features may be included.
Bridge Replacement- The total replacement of a structurally inadequate or functionally obsolete bridge to current geometric
construction standards. No new capacity included.
CDOT MAINTENANCE
The preservation of the entire highway, including surface, shoulders, roadsides, structures and such traffic-control devices as are
necessary for safe and efficient utilization of the highway.
CDOT OPERATIONS
This category includes the administrative functions of the Department such as accounting, budgeting, personnel, information systems,
public relations, etc.
CORRIDOR STUDIES, INTERMODAL STUDIES
This category includes Major Investment Studies (MISS) or Corridor Investment Studies (CISs), or any intermodal type study.
DATA COLLECTION
This includes all types of data collection activities related to the provision of the transportation system infrastructure, services, plans,
etc. This includes bridge inspection activities, traffic collecting programs, vehicle occupancy data collection, pavement condition
inspections, accident records, etc.
DRIVER BEHAVOIR (AKA Safety or Education Programs)
Motor vehicle driver programs intended to increase driver safety awareness and practice. Programs focusing on alcohol and drug
impaired driving, seatbelt usage, young drivers, aggressive drivers, motorcycle operations and helmet usage, law enforcement
programs, bicycle safety and education programs, etc.
ENHANCEMENTS MOBILITY
Transportation Buildings —
Pedestrian Facilities —
Bike Facilities or Programs -
ENHANCEMENTS - SYSTEM QUALITY
This category includes the following activities:
Acquisition of Scenic Easements and Scenic or Historic Sites - This activity describes acquisition of scenic easements
including plot plans, surveys, property appraisals, review, relocation, and demolition, if necessary, for the purchase, donation,
transfer, or trade of the simple titled lands. Easements must be in proximity to a designated Scenic Byway or qualifying
historic site. Also described by this activity is the acquisition of properties listed in the State or National Registers of Historic
Places, or properties designated by a local government or landmark commission as a landmark or historic district.
Scenic or Historic Highway Programs (Including the Provision of Tourist and Welcome Center Facilities)- This category
includes activities for the protection and enhancement of designated Colorado Scenic and Historic Byways. roadways that arc
listed in the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or roadways designated as landmarks or historic districts by a local
government or landmarks commission. TE Program funds may be used for projects that will protect and enhance the scenic,
historic, cultural, natural, or archaeological integrity and visitor appreciation of these roadways.
Control and Removal of Outdoor Advertising - This activity includes the control and removal of existing outdoor advertising
signs, displays and devices, which is in addition to the requirement to exercise "effective control" of outdoor advertising under
Title 23 Section 131 U.S.C. Expenditures made to remove existing signs, displays and devices must be made according to a
legal process that bases payment on an equitable appraisal.
Archaelogic Research—
Historic Preservation - This activity includes the identification, evaluation, recordation, documentation, curation,protection,
management, interpretation or maintenance of historic districts. sites, buildings, structures, landscapes, or objects (and any
related artifacts and records); and the rehabilitation, restoration or stabilization of properties included in the State or National
Registers of Historic Places, or designated as a landmark or historic district by a local government or landmarks
commission. Projects include rehabilitation of historic places and activities that encourage or facilitate tourism, that improve
neighborhood appearance or quality, or that assist in providing project users with educational opportunities or services.
Reduce Vehicle-Caused Wildlife Mortality While Maintaining Habitat Connectivity - Projects designed to reduce vehicle-
caused wildlife mortality could include grade separations for game trails where they intersect the transportation system,
warning devices or systems for drivers or wildlife, establishing alternative watering or feeding areas for wildlife, removing
obstacles to wildlife movements, fencing, or other activities.
Establishment of Transportation Museums Historic Preservation - This activity includes the identification, evaluation,
recordation, documentation, curation, protection, management. interpretation or maintenance of historic districts, sites,
buildings, structures, landscapes, or objects (and any related artifacts and records); and the rehabilitation, restoration or
stabilization of properties included in the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or designated as a landmark or historic
district by a local government or landmarks. This activity includes establishing facilities for the display and preservation of
surface transportation related artifacts. The facility must be open and accessible to the general public and be operated by a non-
profit agency While a reasonable admission fee may he charged, the fee may be used only to cover expenses directly related to
the transportation museum and cannot he diverted to other programs. TE Program funds fin this actik it may be used only for
the original establishment of the museum: ongoing operating expenses are not eligible. The preservation of artifacts within an
existing museum and operational costs for historic transportation facilities may be eligible under other activities listed above.
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
This category includes the following activities:
Drainage / Erosion Control / Storm Water Runoff- Drainage or erosion control projects are those involving primarily the non-
incidental improvement to drainage or erosion control. Erosion control may include the installation of rip rap, wire mesh
netting, construction of sediment ponds, slope stabilization, retaining walls, etc. Drainage projects may include the
installation/rebuilding of box culverts, ditches inlets. gutters. and/or piping structures. Also included in this category are
eligible enhancement program projects related to mitigating water pollution from storm water runoff from existing
transportation facilities. Eligible projects include design and construction of new storm water treatment devices on existing
transportation facilities and research projects that address the subject of this category.
Landscaping - This activity includes landscape planning, plus design and construction projects which significantly enhance the
aesthetic or ecological resources along transportation corridors. This category also includes projects eligible for enhancement
funds: projects which significantly enhance the aesthetic resources or beauty of a project including scenic vistas and overlooks,
restoration of historic landscapes and construction of landscapes or streetscapes compatible with their environment. Projects
that significantly enhance the ecological balance along a transportation corridor include identifying and planting for restoration
or reintroduction of native plant communities and appropriate adaptive species.
GEOMETRICS
The classification called geometries and safety involves reconstruction on the approximate alignment of an existing route to rectify
unsafe road conditions including narrow lanes and shoulders as well as unsafe curve radii and road cambers.
GUARDRAIL
Guardrail refers to the non-incidental installation of guardrail upon an existing facility. Installation of guardrail should be the primary
activity related to contracts of this classification.
HIGHWAY STUDIES
This category includes any type of highway study. related specifically to highways and does not invoke other transportation modes.
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS - MOBILITY
This category includes all types of programs and projects related to Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) such as variable message
signs, traffic operations centers, incident management, automated ports of entry, etc. It also includes any projects related to CDOT's
shared resources program. In addition it includes telecommunication enhancements provided by the private sector such as improved
fiber optic connections, improved cellular telephone coverage, internet access, etc.
Traffic Operations Center (TOC) -
Telecommunications -
Automated Ports of Entry -
Operations, TSM, ramp metering -
Kiosks, Websites, brochures -
Incident Management/Roadway Assistance
INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION
This category includes the reconstruction or widening of an existing interchange. The project will be of varying complexity and
widely varying cost depending on the nature and location of the conjoining roadways and the nature of the improvement. This
category also includes grade separation, which involves reconstruction on the approximate alignment of an existing route of a dual
grade intersection of a highway and a railroad where the old pavement structure and intersection is removed and replaced.
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
This category includes the minor reconstruction or minor widening of an existing intersection. It also includes non-incidental
improvements to the signing and signalization at the intersection.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: ADD CAPACITY BOTH (UNDETERMINED) OR NEW MULTI-MODE CORRIDOR
This category is used for any new corridor that is undergoing feasibility analysis and/or the solutions are not yet identified. This
category is also used for new travel corridors that will have multiple modes.
NEW CONSTRUCTION - HIGHWAY
This involves the construction of a new roadway on a new alignment and can include the right of way. design, preliminary
engineering. utility costs. environmental costs associated with obtaining appropriate permits, etc.
NEW CONSTRUCTION - TRANSIT
This category includes the provision of new light rail transit service.
NOISE BARRIER
This category involves the construction of a physical barrier of masonry, wood, concrete or other noise-reducing material along the
roadway right-of-way to buffer traffic noise from adjacent residences. Noise barrier construction is usually undertaken during
construction/upgrade of a roadway. Type II Noise barriers which are put in only to mitigate noise along a roadway not undergoing any
significant upgrade is a limited program to be phased out after 2002.
PEDESTRIAN AND/OR BICYCLE PLANS
This category includes any study related to the provision of pedestrian or bicycle facilities, trails, etc.
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS
This category includes provision of sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, pedestrian overpasses and underpasses, pedestrian trails, etc. It
also includes educational programs for pedestrians.
PROGRAM DELIVERY
Those support functions that enable the delivery of CD0T's programs and services.
RAIL CROSSING UPGRADE
Rail crossing upgrade refers to the provision of gates, lights, and/or warning signals where a roadway intersects with a railroad track.
RAIL MOBILITY
This program is related to the provision of rail services, both passenger and freight.
Rail Line construction -
Rail sidings -
Rail stations (non-historic) -
Rail vehicles -
RAIL. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION
The acquisition of existing or abandoned rail corridors for the purpose of reinstating rail service or preserving the corridor for other
transportation purposes. This category includes the eligible enhancement activity for preserving rail right of way. This category also
includes any maintenance to the preserved rail right of way such as weed control, etc.
RAIL STUDIES
This category includes both passenger and freight related rail studies and updates.
RECONSTRUCTION
This category involves construction on the approximate alignment of an existing route where the old pavement structure is
substantially removed and replaced. It may also include maintenance activities related to both asphalt and concrete reconstruction.
Asphalt Reconstruction -
Concrete Reconstruction -
RECONST—ADDED CAP. - HWY
This category involves construction of additional highway lanes, including truck climbing lanes. passing lanes, and accel/decel lanes,
and the reconstruction of the existing roadbed where the old pavement structure is substantially removed and replaced.
New Interchange -
RECONSTRUCTION: ADDED CAPACITY BOTH (UNDETERMINED) OR MULTI-MODE CORRIDOR
This category is used for any existing corridor that has an ongoing Major or Corridor Investment Study and the solutions are not yet
identified. This category is also used for the provision of multiple modes within an existing travel corridor.
RECONSTRUCTION -TRANSIT ADDED CAPACITY
This category includes the provision of bus lanes and HOV lanes in highway corridors.
REST AREA OR INFO CENTER
This category includes the building of a new rest area facility including all related fixtures and accoutrements. This classification can
also be used if the facility is being substantially reconstructed. Also included in this category are welcome/information centers.
ROCKFALL MITIGATION
This involves activities related to preventing rocks from falling onto the highway that contribute to road closures.
SAFETY — ROADWAY
Projects that correct or improve high hazard locations, eliminates roadside obstacles, improves highway signing and pavement
markings, installs priority control systems for emergency vehicles at signalized intersections, installs or replaces emergency motorist
aid call boxes, or installs traffic control or warning devices at locations with high accident potential.
Signing -
Striping -
Lighting -
SURFACE TREATMENT
This category includes asphalt and concrete overlays, asphalt and concrete cracks sealing, asphalt and concrete crack sealing, asphalt
chip sealing, concrete slab replacement, and concrete pavement repair.
Asphalt Major Overlay —An asphalt major overlay consists of the addition of 4-6 inches of asphalt pavement directly over an
existing asphalt surface. This treatment is used to correct severe distresses in the existing pavement surface.
Asphalt Medium Overlay — An asphalt medium overlay consists of the addition of 2.01-3.99 inches of asphalt pavement
directly over an existing asphalt surface. This treatment is used to correct moderate distresses in the existing pavement
surface.
Asphalt Thin Overlay — An asphalt thin overlay consists of the addition of 2 inches of asphalt pavement directly over an
existing asphalt surface. This treatment is used to correct minor distresses in the existing asphalt surface.
Asphalt Chip Seal—A seal coat consisting of the application of asphalt followed by a cover of aggregate. This treatment is
used to correct minor distresses, primarily as a "wearing" surface.
Asphalt Crack Sealing - Crack sealing is the application of liquid asphalt into existing cracks, thus sealing the crack from water
and other forces that cause the deterioration of the pavement. This treatment also improves the "ride' of the pavement by
bridging the gaps in the cracks.
Concrete Asphalt Overlay — A concrete asphalt overlay is a structure composed of an asphalt wearing surface over a portland
cement concrete slab. A concrete asphalt overlay on a portland cement concrete slab is also called a composite pavement.
Concrete Slab Replacement— Concrete slab replacement is when an existing concrete slab, from one joint to the next joint, has
deteriorated such that it is removed and a new concrete slab is poured in its place.
Concrete Pavement Repair— Concrete pavement repair consists of concrete crack sealing, concrete slab replacement or
diamond grinding. Diamond grinding is a treatment used to remove or level irregularities in concrete surfaces.
Concrete Crack Sealing
Concrete Crack Sealing - Crack sealing is the application of liquid asphalt into existing cracks, thus sealing the crack from
water and other forces that cause the deterioration of the pavement. This treatment also improves the "ride- of the pavement
by bridging the gaps in the cracks.
TRANSIT MISC
This program provides for the capital and operations functions of transit providers.
TRANSIT — MOBILITY
This program is related to the provision of expanded or new transit service, including fixed route, demand responsive,
elderly/disabled, special transit such as in resort areas), paratransit, etc.
Transfer stations (inter-modalcenters) -
Park-n-Rides -
Transit stations -
New/expanded service operating costs -
New/expanded service capital costs (AKA bus purchase) -
Amenities (shelters, stops, benches, Bus pullouts, etc.) -
TRANSIT SYSTEM QUALITY
Improvements which relate to existing transit service and capital property such as vehicles, stations, shelters, fare boxes, signs,
maintenance facilities. bus washing facilities, operating costs for existing transit service, and capital replacement, including vehicle
replacement.
New transit maintenance facility -
Rehab transit maintenance facility -
Operating funds (existing) -
Capital funds (existing) -
Bus Replacement -
TRANSIT STUDIES
This category includes any study related to transit, including Transit Development Plans (TDPs), the transit needs and benefit study,
etc.
TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT
This category includes all programs related to travel demand management, such as ,arpooling, vanpooling, telecommuting, guaranteed
ride home programs, etc.
Carpool, vanpools -
Other TDM programs -
TRUCK ESCAPE (AKA Truck Ramp or Net)
This category includes the construction of a short (usually less than 'A mile in length) ramp of earthen material, aggregate, and perhaps
a cover of asphalt roadway, at a steep incline. Th purpose of the construction is to provide a means of escape should a vehicle's
brakes fail during the traverse of a prolonged descent in roadway elevation (decline). Substantial non-incidental application of
guardrail and or impact attenuators may be constructed as a part of the project.
Ami
CU
E
CI
CIJ
hi
Cla
CI
4.
il
:
CA
April 19, 2000
"Information Only" Section of The STIP
Surface Treatment Program
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) programming of the Surface Treatment Program (STP) has been
changed from prior STIP documents. The Surface Treatment Program is a Transportation Commission Statewide
Allocation to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Engineering Regions based on performance criteria.
This Program is being moved to a new "Information Only" section of the STIP.
In order to streamline the performance based Surface Treatment Program the following new programming changes have
been made to the STIP:
• Surface Treatment projects are now listed in the "Information Only" section of the STIP.
• Regional "Control Totals" are programmed in the body of the STIP.
• Project costs are not included in the STIP.
• Projects are not shown year specific.
• Projects are selected based on three years of funding (FY 2001 - FY 2003).
• The regional project selection process and criteria are included in the "Information Only" section of the STIP.
Surface Treatment Project Selection Process and Criteria
• Tour roadway system and consult with Engineers and Maintenance.
• Foreman, Resident, Program, and Materials Engineers and RTD meet to discuss needs.
• Select projects based on: field review, Commission goals, traffic volumes, truck volumes, Pavement Management
Program (PMP) output, ability to combine with other projects, annual allocation, accident history/safety issues and
input from local agencies.
Planned Surface Treatment Projects, FY 2001-FY 2003
Region 1 Surface Treatment Projects
• 170, Floyd Hill to Idaho Spgs, MP 241.3 to 246.5
• SH 86, Elizabeth East and West, MP 12.3 to 17.3
• SH 59, Kit Carson to 170, MP 25 to 35
• SH 285, Fairplay N and S, MP 171 to 175.9, 182.9 to 186.5
• US 40, Berthoud Falls to Empire Jct., MP 249.1 to 257.5
• US 36, Arapahoe Co. Line to Washington Co. Line, MP 101 to 129
• 170, Bakerville
• SH 6, In Keystone and Dillon
• SH 9 In Silverthorne, MP 102 to 103.6
• SH 59, Kit Carson to 170, MP 0 to 41 various locations
• SH 74, East of Evergreen, MP 8 to 15
• Pass, MP 226.3 to 253 7
SH 24, Antero jet to Wilkerson in
• 170 Genoa-East MP 368 to 376
• 170, El Rancho to Floyd Hill, MP 246.5 to 252.4
• 125, So. of Meadows/Founders Parkway, MP 181.2 to 183.3
• SH 83, So. of Franktown, MP 30.2 to 40.0
• SH 9, Ute Pass Road, North, MP 115 to 122
Region 2 Surface Treatment Projects
• 125, North of Eagleridge, Pueblo, 6.5 miles
• 125, North of Pueblo, Pueblo, 5.0 miles
• 125, Pinon Rest Area — North, Pueblo/El Paso, 5.4 miles
• 125, Ray Nixon — South, El Paso, 4.0 miles
• SH 10, East of Walsenburg, Huerfano, 20.0 miles
• SH 10/160, East and West of Walsenburg, Huerfano, 10.0 miles (SH 10), 6.1 miles (SH 160)
• SH 24, W. of Manitou Springs to Woodland Park, El Paso/Teller, 15.0, miles
• SH 50, Parkdale to Cotopaxi, Fremont, 19.0 miles
• SH 50, Jct. SH 115 to Fremont/Pueblo Cty Line, Fremont, 6.4 miles
• SH 50, McCulloch to Baltimore, Pueblo, 7.8 miles
• SH 50B, 125 Interchange to Pueblo Chemical Depot, Pueblo, 14.3 miles
• SH 50, West of Fowler, Otero, 7.7 miles
• SH 50, Ft. Lyon to Hasty, Bent, 13.2 miles
• SH 50, East of Lamar, Prowers, 2.4 miles
• SH 85, Nevada Ave., Uintah St. - South, El Paso, 2.8 miles
• SH 85, Nevada Ave., Uintah St. — North, El Paso, 4.0 miles
• SH 89, South of Holly, Prowers, 7.14 miles
• SH 96, Kansas State Line —West, Kiowa, 6.5 miles
• SH 109. Bent/Otero County Line to La Junta, Otero. 25.7 miles
• SH 160C. Trinidad to Beshoar Junction. Las Animas. 5.1 miles
• SH 160, West of La Veta, Huerfano, 10.8 miles
• SH 160 , West of Pritchett, Baca, 17.7 miles
• SH 165, McKenzie Jct. — South, Custer, 12.0 miles
• SH 165, West of Rye, Custer/Pueblo, 12.0 miles
Region 3 Surface Treatment Projects
• 1-70, Eagle East
• SH 50, Unaweep - East
• SH 40, West Side Of Rabbit Ears
• SH 149, Powderhorn North And South
• SH 13, Meeker
• SH 65, Grand Mesa
• 1-70, Glenwood Canyon
• SH 82, Glenwood South
• SH 06/SH 340, Grand Junction Various Locations
• SH 13, North Of Craig
• SH 14, East Of Walden
• SH 40, Kremmling - West
• SH 40/SH 64, Muddy Pass - East
• SH 40, Granby To Tabernash
• SH 50, Cimarron
• SH 64, E. Of Rangely
• SH 92, Black Canyon
• SH 82, West Glenwood South
• SH 50, Delta - South
• SH 24 Battle Mtn. To Tennessee Pass
• SH 40, West Of MaybeII
• SH 131, Oak Creek South
• SH 318, Utah State Line - East
• SH 34, Granby To Grand Lake
• SH 149, South Of Lake City
• SH 141/1-70, Various Chip Seals, Various Locations
• SH 92, Forest Land Black Canyon
• SH 330, Molina - Plateau City
• SH 133/SH 187, Hotchkiss Paonia
Region 4 Surface Treatment Projects
• SH 14, Briggsdale - West
• SH 14, Ault - West
• US 34, 54th Ave to 8th Ave (Greeley)
• US 34, East of Yuma - East
• US 34, West of Akron - East
• SH 61, Washington and Logan Counties
• US 287, Quebec Avenue to SH 66 (Longmont)
• US6, Paoli - E & W
• 1-25, SH 52 - North, NB
• 1-25, SH 52 - North, SB
• US 36, Last Chance - East
• US 36, Estes Park to Lyons - Upper Portion
• SH 52, Hudson - East
• SH 63, 1-76 - South
• SH 71, North of SH 14
• US 85, Ft Lupton to Brighton - SB
• US 85, Ft Lupton to Brighton - NB
• SH 113, SH 138 - North
• SH 7/93 (Broadway): University Ave to Pine Street, NB
• SH 7/93 (Broadway): University Ave to Pine Street, SB
• US 34, Wray - West
• US 36, 28th St in Boulder - NB
• US 36, 28th St in Boulder - SB
• US 36, Estes Park to Lyons - Lower Portion
• SH 59, Cope - South
• US 85, North of Nunn to South of Rockport
• US 287, Ted's Place - North
• US 287, Virginia Dale - N & S
• US 385, S of 1-76 - South
Region 5 Surface Treatment Projects
• SH 17, Alamosa to Jct. US 285, MP 69.1-118.8
• SH 62, East of Placerville, miles 0.0-12.8
• US 84, State Line to Pagosa Springs, miles 0.0-27.9
• SH 141, North of Naturita, miles 63.0-75.5
• SH 145, Lizard Head Pass - North, miles 59.0-71.4
• SH 149, Creede North, miles 21.7-41.1
• SH 160, West Side of Wolf Cr. Pass, miles 159.0-166.6
• US 550, Bondad to US 160, miles 3.3-16.6
• US 666. Cahone to Utah State Line, miles 51.0-69.6
Region 6 Surface Treatment Projects
• Morrison Rd. W. of C 470 to E. of C 470, MP 2.50-7.11
• Broadway/W. Littleton Blvd., W. Main St., Bowles Ave. , Platte Canyon at US 85 to Platte Canyon Rd., MP 4.34-5.34
• US 40 at Sheridan Blvd. to Kipling St., MP 291.30-294.50
• N. Tower Rd., US 40 to 1-70, MP 0-1.27
• US 40, 1-225 to Airport Blvd, MP 306.34-308.57
• S. Parker Rd./Leetsdale Dr., Jewell Ave. to Mississippi Ave, MP 73.08-74.54
• S. Santa Fe Dr., C 470 to Church Ave., MP 200.39-203.62
• US 40, Tabor St. to Kipling St., MP 290.14-291.44
• S. Wadsworth Blvd., Waterton Canyon to C 470, MP 0-4.34
• S. Sheridan Blvd./Sheridan Blvd., 25th Ave to 1-76, MP 6.90-9.89
• 168th Ave./SH 7/160th Ave/Bridget St./SH 7, 1-25 to US 85, MP 70.00-77.12
• Wadsworth Bypass, US 285 to US 6, MP 7.49-12.44
• Auraria Parkway/14th St./Lawrence St./Marion St./Walnut St./E. 40th St, 14th St. to SH 2, MP .98-4.98
• S. University Blvd., SH 88 to US 285, MP 3.94-5.99
• Federal Blvd./Belleview Ave., Dahlia St. to 1-25, MP 13.00-14.70
• Vasquez Blvd./US 6, 1-70 to 1-76, MP 291.04-295.95
• S. Shierdan Blvd./Sheridan Blvd, US 285 to Evans Ave, MP 0-1.79
• US 85, I-70 to Hwy 7, MP 227-236
• 1-225, West of Parker Rd. to Alameda Ave., MP 3.00-8.00
• 1-76, York St. to US 6, MP 7.11-9.48
• C 470, SH 8 to Ken Caryl, MP 4.25-10.19
• US 285/W. Hampden Ave./E. Jefferson Ave./E Hampden Ave., Happy Canyon Rd. to 1-25, MP 263.18-263.87
• US 6 to US 85, MP 9.48 to 12.51
• S. University Blvd , Arapahoe Rd. to Orchard Rd., MP 2-3.23
• 1-70, 1-270 to East of Peoria St., MP 279.29-281.80
• W. 120th Ave., MP 5 45 to SH 121 MP 5 45-7 88
Bypass, Park Hill Ave., MP 30 � 00
• Wadsworth C-470 to Hill wc ....,-�.....
• Kipling St., SH 8 to Jewell Ave., MP .98-2.08
• Federal Blvd./Belleview Ave., SH 26 to Jewell Ave., MP 1.98-3.94
• 1-70, SH 121 to East of Pecos St., MP 269.34-273.30
• Federal Blvd/W. 120th Ave/US 287/S. 112th St, US 40 to 1-70, MP 282.68-285.75
• I-25Nalley Hwy, Lincoln Ave. to Dry Creek Rd., MP 192.99-196.14
• US 40, SH 26 and 1-70 to US 6, MP 284.68-286.85
• I-25Nalley Hwy, 70th Ave. to N. Of 84th Ave., MP 216.78-218.60
• S. Sheridan Blvd./Sheridan Blvd., 69th Ave to 88th Ave, MP 11.69-14.09
• Wadsworth Bypass, 104th Ave. to SH 128, MP 23.85-26.30
• US 285/W. Hampden Ave./E. Jefferson Ave./E Hampden Ave., C 470 to SH 391, MP 250-253.49
• Ward Rd./Wadsworth Bypass, Park Hill Ave. to US 285, MP 4-7.49
• Wadsworth Bypass, Park Hill Ave. to US 285, MP 4-7.49
• W 6th Ave., Wadsworth Blvd. to Federal Blvd., MP 280-91-283-86
• I-25Nalley Hwy, 120th Ave. to Hwy 7, MP 223.50-229.10
• I-25Nalley Hwy, Evans to Broadway, MP 203.53-206.96
• Wadsworth Bypass, 90th Ave. to 104th Ave., MP 21.90 to 23,85
• W. 120th Ave., US 287 to 1-25, MP 12-14
Bridge Project Selection Process and Criteria
• Consider Sufficiency rating to establish "worst-first" list.
• Input from Program Engineers, Maintenance Superintendent and Region Planners.
• Project selection is based on sufficiency ratings. highway classifications, traffic volumes, truck volumes, ability to
combine with other projects, annual funding allocations and input from local agencies.
Safety Project Selection Process and Criteria
• Signal pool: based on the number and types of warrants, accident history, traffic volumes, city, county and public input
and availability of local match. This list is re-evaluated each year and signals at the top of the list are candidates for
installation.
• Sign pool: based on goal to replace every 10 years. Completed on a corridor basis with the corridors selected based
on condition of majority of signs (age, reflectivity, etc.), traffic volumes and continuity of corridor, high profile corridors
(Interstate & NHS).
• Striping pool: based on goal to have year round markings on all roadways. Corridors selected based on traffic volume,
Interstate Highways, condition of marking in towns and cities and stencil marking in towns and cities. In addition,
impacts due to snow and ice sanding are considered.
• Hot Spot: based on case by case analysis of public and local agency requests, accident history, citizen input, field
studies and warrant analysis.
Hello