HomeMy WebLinkAbout20002688.tiff otiol‘v
L_____TM
Weld County Referral
C. September 28 2000
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Katherine Oliver/ Meadow Case Number S-562 1
Vale Phalse`ft ,
Please Reply By October 19, 2000 Planner Anne Johnson
Project Planned Unit Development Final Plat for Phase II of Meadow Vale Subdivis.on
—i
Legal Part of the SW4 of Section 4, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to State Hwy 119; east of and adjacent to WCR 5 5
Parcel Number 1313 04 400050
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation, ou
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further q nes:inns
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Board of County Commissioner Hearing November 8, 2000
01 y/e have reviewed the request and find that it does./does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
idt` We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
Di See attached letter.
,YD 8o 4/c/_will-- /jGy4, Ate" " a,-
Comments: n/ aa v A I L& /V OP.2ir d/Aiji✓JL J.kd-�'G it Pi-& 4'g
Signature i Date /O a -�'i:i
Agency
+1Neld County Planning Dept. :1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 304-6498 fE,x
2000-2688
Weld County Hann ,, g t)ppt.
Lie., MEMORANDUM 1 2D
ilit R E V )1/3 eq, a
TO: Anne Joinson DATE: October 12, 2010
FROM: Diane Houghtaling, P.E., Traffic Engineer.-[) q, -4-
111 C. SUBJECT: S-562: Meadow Vale, Phase 2 PUD
COLORADO
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this PUD Fiaal Plan request.
COMMENTS:
External Roadways: WCR 5.5 is designated a collector roadway in the MUD plan. Collectors require d ninin i n
80-foot right-of-way. Please label the right-of-way on the plat. It is my understanding that :he right-of wa,tram ar
was never recorded. If it has been recorded, please indicated the document number. If it has not teen r cord. it
please revise the right-of-way dedication on this plat. Please include the typical section fcr WCR 5 5 0,ie-haL .d
I WCR 5.5 will be required for this development. Please revise the drainage and roadway plans Elea':,e indic :e
any tapers that may be required. Intersection sight distance triangles shall be shown on the plat. All le nriscap- g
in the intersection sight distance triangles must be less than 3.5 feet high at maturity.
internal Roadways: The richt-of-way for internal roadways must be dedicated to the County. Please label ,e
C' right-of-way on al streets. Stop signs and street name signs will be required at all intersections.
\, Storm Water: The drainage study submitted did not adoress any of t'i'e issues left oper at the ct urine of zc a
i A review of the flood maps will be required. If a water surface elevation is not printed on the map, the et is neer . ill
I be required to calculate it.
V Improvements Agreement: See memo by Donald Carrell.
4' RECOMMENDATION: Approval
DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (If Appyovedl:
J Typical sections for the internal and external roadways shall be provided. The required rght-c`-wait u,
internal and external roadways shall be dedicated to the County.
•
Ft, Li A stop sign and street name sign shall be placed at the intersection.
U Landscaping within the intersection sight distance triangle shad be less than 3.5 feet at inatur
V' J The drainage study shall be revised and resubmitted for review. the Home-owner's Assccra cn
i 'Li agree to maintain the storm sewer system.
v
If you have any questions, please call.
pc: S-562
WCR 5.5
M:rWPFILESVdianeADEVELOPMENrAs-562.wrd
St. Vrain Valley Schc.,l District RE-1J
395 South Pratt Parkway • ddL44ongmont • CO • 80501-6499
Weld Count�iDT Rr 'uep4978 • FAX :103-682-7343
t.
October 5, 2000
Anne Johnson OCT 1 1 2000
Weld County Department of PlanningServices
1400 N. 17th Ave. RECEIVED
Greeley, Co 80631
RE: Meadow Vale Phase II 3r° Filing Final Plan (Part of the SW1/4 of Section 4, T2N, R68W)
Dear Anne:
Thank you for referring the Meadow Vale PUD, Final Plan for Phase II. The projected student impact upon the St. Vr tin
Valley School District of what appears to be the possibilty of 14 new single family units on 4.352 acres is a total o• 9
students. Any students living in this subdivision would attend Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle, and Skyline High
School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schoo s this development : ad
other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. Bus transporter on
would likely be required.
This Proposed Development Cumulative impact of thjs Development
Plus all Final Development Plans 1995-0Q
Building Sep-00 Student Projected Over Proj. Stdnts Total Cum. Seats Available
Capacity Enrollment Impact Enrollment Capacity 95-00 plans Enrollment W/Cum. Impact
Elementary 504 702 5 707 Yes 1184 1891 -1387
Middle 342 402 2 404 Yes 571 404 -62
Senior 1323 1374 2 1376 Yes 704 2080 -757 _
2169 9 2459 4375 -2206 _
The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a stud ant
enrollment standpoint. This deveiopment would impact all levels of schools in the current attendance area. While there
are new schools planned in this area which should reduce overcrowding, there are other approved developments which
would. together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools.
As the volume of developments increases in this attendance area with no alleviation of the existing overcrow(ed
conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided students in ot ier
areas becomes increasingly difficult. Typically the District would oppose development that would overcrowd the schools
however this developer has signed an agreement to pay a cash-in-lieu of land fee to address the school site needs for
this area. This payment is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each indivicual lot. The District Nill
issue a receipt as each lot is paid for that will serve as proof ot satisfaction of this requirement. The District apprecia:es
the cooperation of the developer and County in the process. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
/air
Scott Toillion, AICP
Planning Specialist
"Excellence - Our Only Option"
Exhibit B School Planning MEADOW VALE FARM PHASE II
Standards And
Calculation of
in Lieu Fees
Single Family
School_ Planning Standards
Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed
Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in-lieu
Units Yield Standard Acres Contribution Value Contribution
Elementary 14 0.35 525 10 0.09 $25,100
4.9
Middle Level 14 0.14 750 25 0.07 $25,100
1 .96
High School 14 0H7 1200 40 0.08 $25,100
2.38
Total 9.24 0.24 $25,100 $5,974
Single Family Student Yield is .66 $427
Per Unit
10/9/00
Weld County fanning Dept.
Kit t\ c '.''' i') .', 2000
�Wel o 'r Referral
1111JD€
September 28. 2000
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Katherine Oliver/ Meadow Case Number S-562 l
Vale Phase II
Please Reply By October 19, 2000 Planner Anne Johnson •
Project Planned Unit Development Final Plat for Phase II of Meadow Vale Subdivision I
i
Legal Part of the SW4 of Section 4, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado. f
Location North of and adjacent to State Hwy 119; east of and adjacent to WCR 5.5
Parcel Number 1313 04 400050
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further q 3esions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Board of County Commissioner Hearing November 8, 2000
❑I We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
DI/ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
U See attached letter.
Comments:
/
t%`'
Signature - e0 Gtsea us,\SL. { ( Date /C -f a-C CL —,/
Agency - UM, ( 7/vn.A1 Sierr c . S 0 Bic -e ,
..Weld County Planning Dept. ..1ti55 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 ..(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 304-6498 fix
October 2, 2000
Ms. Anne Johnson
Weld County Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO. 80631
Re: S-562 Planned Unit Development Final Plat for Phase II of Meadow Vale Subdivis-on
Dear Planners:
/ All streets be well lit. A street light be placed at all crossroad signs to help emergency
responding units locate an address in case of an emergency.
/ That all addresses be located to where they can be seen from the roadway. If the house is
located back off the roadway that an address be posted on a fence visible from the road..
V The mailboxes be located in one centralized location, i.e. a cluster. This will alleviate
possible vandalism to single mailboxes placed along side the roadway.
V A school bus site be put into the plans. With the layout of this proposal it is essential a
school bus drop-off and pick-up be installed to mitigate resident issues and provide for improved
safety.
Needs to be a plan made for a community center. With the size of this project, there will
be a need to meet and discuss future concerns from the residents. @S2
i! Open space is aesthetically pleasing. However, fencing or some other barriers are
necessary to separate from proposed and existing water ponds and ditches to mitigate the threat
of drowning for small children living in the area. Existing oil tanks sites area also located close
to the development. Fencing needs to surround them to alleviate the potential of vandalism. 1.--"
!Lighting needs to be in both areas to help stop potential problems that could possible occur near
both areas.
General mitigation features need to include, but are not limited to, lot design or block
layout that reduce the availability of crime targets, elimination of barriers that prevent easy
detection of potential offenders or an offense in progress, and placement of physical obstacles to
committing a crime. It is important neighborhood space and traffic patterns be designed to
reduce routine exposure of potential offenders to crime targets.
Please contact me if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Les Cogswell
Beat 2 Supervisor
cc: Sheriff Jordan
Beat 2
Weld County Planning Services
sLI" i-i',,Et;.;; ; :Ii,- i•lif___ Jig (ye, vcauntyp,a rI,,ng WeldDept County Referral
Q O1 2000 September 28, 2000
COL,ORADO• E E I V 0
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Katherine Oliver/ Meadow Case Number S-562
Vale Phase II
Please Reply By October 19, 2000 Planner Anne Johnson
Project Planned Unit Development Final Plat for Phase II of Meadow Vale Subdivis on 3
Legal Part of the SW4 of Section 4, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to State Hwy 119; east of and adjacent to WCR 5 5
Parcel Number 1313 04 400050
_ _ .. ..,._.......,,,.,__, ...._...._,,.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date ME he
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further ques:icns
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Board of County Commissioner Hearing November 8, 2000
O1 We have reviewed the request and find that it does,'does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑I We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
4 See attached letter.
Comments:
, / /
/ Date
Signature z/6 _...A_,. .,---) _ ��
Agency k-LYC %t�x vrr-t o2/0 .752,--n_.,(2
4 Neld County Planning Dept. •11555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6'00 ext.3540 •:•(970) 304-6498 rex
STATE OT COLORADO
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Department of Natural Resources
weld Co-mty Planning Dept.
1313 Sherman Street,Room 72 L 1. �
Denver,Colorado 80203
Phone:(303)866-3441 OQ ��,r
FAX:(303)866-4474 (1C i-r 0 4 2V
www.cwch.state.co.us RECEIVED
1311I Ot‘c
October 2, 2000 Greg I V Ache i
F.cecu
uIrector
Anne Johnson
Weld County Planning Department Dan M,c-.uhae
A_ting L irectoi
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case Number S-562; Katherine Oliver/Meadow Vale Phase II
Dear Ms. Johnson:
During my review of this PUD, it has come to my attention that the entire property is within the I 00-year
floodplain of St. Vrain Creek(Weld Co. FIRM panel #080266 0850C). No mention is made of this in the
final plat for this development
I would urge you to notify the applicant of this fact, so that any design changes in the development can be
made as needed.
Because FEMA has only mapped an approximate floodplain along St. Vrain Creek, the applicant will nee,'.
to hire an engineer to perform a detailed floodplain study to determine the base flood elevations (100-yeas
flood level) for the site, so that future buildings and utilities on the site will comply with Weld County am
FEMA floodplain development regulations.
Please call me if you have any questions. I will look forward to reviewing the floodplain development
permit for the subdivision.
ry 1
Sin;;etcly„ �� l
Carolyn Fritz c_-
Floodplain Information Officer kfu
Flood Protection Program \\
Flood t
Flood Protection•Water Project Planning and Financing•Stream and Lake Protection
Water Supply Protection•Conservation Planning
/ ZONE C
/ 1I
To determine if flood insurance is available in this communitc
RINN contact your insurance agent,or call the National Flood insurance
15 ,// I i 4 Program at(800) 638-6620.
Jr-
APPROXIMATE SCALE
2000 0 2000 FEET
II/ I ZONEA \
�/ =i ® NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRkM
0
7 .. ________ 23 _
J�
� ZONE C FIRM
1
�J , FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
_� II a r--> _- WELD
r... --ii
COUNTY,
ZONE C � � COLORADO
6� UNINCORPORATED AREA
ii
27 26
--------\ PANEL 850 OF 1075
ZONE C (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINT DI
\ I
\\\
Yr
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
34 �, 080266 0850
( 35
�F� I MAP REVISED:
„o,�P SEPTEMBER 28, 1982
__J IJ 1J I d S�— _T 2 N federal emergency management agar cy
3 ..-All 7, if- 2 T I N
111
_ —
II
/ ,,[d �i I
rvrvla11 yo� � wnss3r
`i '
/ I 4
/
/' �?y
I / /e
ICI I
/
_
0I
I
2
/ I
)r I' I
li r
I iil
0
\i•
dad
{1 J I . J �/
,,,,
(I ' it I
T I
I \\ /
m ££ Z£
l
-
- - I ONd�Jlal1 5r?_ — —
-
gpUNTgi4 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
�+ a Administrative Office:
pu f s 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501
ll
e, ' (303) 772-0710 • FAX (303) 651-7702
VIEW
February 15, 2000
Ms. Julie Chester
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Ms. Chester:
I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the PUD Change of Zone for the Katherine
Oliver/Meadow Vale Farm,Phase II (Case Number: Z-539). The Fire District does not object to
the proposed Change in Zone and subsequent development, provided the development is able to
meet the requirements of the Fire District. All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply,
fire hydrant locations, street designs, and fire department access must be met.
Construction plans for the utilities, showing the configuration of streets, the location of fire
hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows (fire flow analysis) will need to be
submitted to the Fire District for review and approval. The installation fire hydrants, water
mains and. access roads is required to parallel construction and storage of combustible materials
on site.
The Fire District reserves the right to make further comments as development proceeds. Nothing
in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that does not
comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the planning
process, should you have any questions, please contact me at(303) 772-0710.
Sincerely,
cam_ C, v. i�
LuAnn Penfoid
Fire Marshal
LMP/lp
cc: x Katharine Oliver, 2385 Homestead Place, Longmont, CO 80504
project file
file
Ip02.17,00
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station
9119 Only Line Rd. 10271 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 t'.C Box 40
Longmont.Co Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 Sc Forest S'
80501 80504 Mead CO 80542 4iwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie.CO 80516 Cacunc CO 805
Hello