HomeMy WebLinkAbout20001343.tiff PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT SE ONLY: �
Case Number `L. Application Fee: /�d 210 .v (/t 5
Zoning District Receipt Number Uc} 01 AI 01-1 gr'I d
Date2,12-IOU 0 Application Checked By:
Planner Assigned to Case:
To BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures).
1(we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of
the following described unincorporated
area off Weld County.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 50M-WEST CQU�'nrg OF SEC- `- TZ N1 ,e.&'SW O 11±6
64' P.M. f U/eu) couiVry, GOL0aM
(If additional space is required, attach an additional dir sheet of this same size or a copy of the deed)
PARCEL NUMBER: -/_.3 L a.,14,1 Ya 5 Q(12 digit number-found on TAX I.D. or obtained at the Assessor's
Office)
NAME OF PROPOSED PUD SUBDIVISION MP-ADM VALE FArld1 PHASE Zr. pap
EXISTING ZONING FUp fL-1 PROPOSED
ZONING TUD
TOTAL ACREAGE 44. 42 ASS OVERLAY DISTRICTS f-Z, MUD
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GUIDE SUBMITTAL (Specific or Conceptual)
5YEGLRtG
PROPERTY OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING:
NAME ADDRESS 2.”c$ �µ�T E 1 (�N6MONt CO PHONE$4a 772-479 /
NAME PHONE
ADDRESS
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(if different than above ')
NAME •
•fA S/6N IA/C-
HOME TELEPHONE ADDRESS 4 3 /�JJdV,477ap1 DUSINEiSSTELEPHONE 970- Z2-3- 75 7 7
' If agent is different from the property owner, please submit written documentation from the property owner authorizing
said agent to represent the owner.
I
t
ignature: 0 r or Authorized Agent
EXHIBIT
8 1 2000-1343
bha design,inc
TRANSMITTAL
to: Julie Chester
Weld County Planning
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley,CO 80631
project: Meadow Vale Farm Phase II PUD
from: BHA Design
date: January 3 1,200 0
Julie,
Please find the enclosed Change of Zone submittal items for Meadow Vale Farm Phase II, PUD:
25 Copies Change of Zone Application (collated with drawings)
25 Copies Change of Zone Drawings, Vicinity Map, and Plat (collated with applications)
2 Checks Filing fee for Change of Zone ($2,000), Fee for legal notice for hearing ($20)
25 Copies Specific Development Guide (sheet 3 of 5; collated with drawings/applications)
25 Copies Weed Control Plan(collated with drawings/applications)
1 Copy Affidavit of Interest Owners—Mineral and Surface Estate
1 Copy List of Names of Mineral Owners and Lessees of Property within 500 feet
1 Copy Affidavit of Interest owners—Surface Estate
1 Copy List of Names of Owners of Property within 500 feet
1 Copy Traffic Study for Meadow Vale Farm PUD
1 Copy Traffic Study for The Elms at Meadow Vale PUD
1 Copy Tap Service Agreement from Left Hand Water District
1 Copy Letter from St. Vrain Sanitation District
1 Copy Improvements Agreement - Exhibit A
1 Copy Improvements Agreement - Exhibit B
If you have any questions, or require any additional information please feel free to call me at:
970-223-7577. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Regards,
Jennifer erson Torrey, ASL
bha design,inc. • 4803 innovation dr. • fort collins,co.80525 • (970)223-7577 • fax:(970)223-1827
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS - PUD CHANGE OF ZONE -
Changing the zone district to PUD is the second step of the PUD application process. In order to proceed with the Change
of Zone application, the applicant must have successfully completed the PUD Sketch Plan procedure. The PUD Change
of Zone process provides the applicant the opportunity to either submit a Specific or Conceptual Development Guide.
The Department of Planning Services' staff shall prepare comments for use by the Planning Commission addressing all
aspects of the application, including conformance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, Mixed Use Development,
master plans of affected municipalities, counties, intergovernmental agreements and comments received from referral
agencies. The Planning Commission shall hold a hearing to consider the application for the Change of Zone in accordance
with Section 6.4.3 of the PUD Ordinance. The Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners concerning the disposition of the requested zone change.
The Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing to consider the Change of Zone application and to take
final action thereon in accordance with Section 6.4.4 of the PUD Ordinance. It is recommended that the applicant attend
all hearings scheduled for consideration of the Change of Zone application in order to present the proposal and answer
questions of the involved governing bodies. The applicant is also encouraged to maintain a working relationship with the
Department of Planning Services' staff once an application has been submitted in order to keep up-to-date with any
developments pertaining to the application. The Department of Planning Services will post a sign on the property under
consideration in a location readily visible from the adjacent roadway(s). The sign will be posted at least fifteen (15) days
preceding the hearing date for the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners' hearing by the Department
of Planning Services..
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS - PUD CHANGE OF ZONE
The following items must be submitted with an application for a Change of Zone to a PUD district.
1. The Change of Zone application forms provided by the Department of Planning Services and application fee.
2. A copy of any agreements signed by agricultural irrigation ditch companies specifying the agreed upon treatment
of any problems resulting from the location of the ditch, or oil and gas facilities, if applicable.
3. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld
County Assessor of the owners of property(the surface estate)within five hundred (500)feet of the property subject
to the application. The source of such list shall be the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update
from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk
and Recorder. If the list was assembled from the records of the Assessor, the applicant shall certify that such list
was assembled within thirty (30) days of the application submission date.
4. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel
of land being considered. The source of such list shall be assembled from the records of the Weld County Clerk
and Recorder, or from an ownership update derived from such records of a title or abstract company or an attorney.
5. A Change of Zone Rat(See page 9 of this packet).
6. A Specific or Conceptual Development Guide as described in page 14 of this packet, which includes the eight(8)
major components of the Development Plan.
7. Additional information required by the Department of Planning Services, Planning Commission or the Board of
County Commissioners in order to determine that the application meets the goals, policies, and standards set forth
in the Comprehensive Plan, PUD, MUD, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, and any applicable Intergovernmental
Agreements.
7
DEVELOPMENT PLAN NARRATIVE
I. LAND USE
A. Conformance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan:
The property is currently zoned as PUD R-1. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan, Conceptual
Land Use Plan illustrates the subject property as Limiting Site Factors Lowest Intensity. The
property also falls within the I-25 Mixed Use Development(M.U.D.) Activity center overlay
district. This district requires a P.U.D. process. The proposed density of the project falls within
the density limitations specified in the M.U.D. district for Limiting Site Factors Lowest Intensity.
B. Overall Concept:
The project will be designed as a residential subdivision with single family detached homes on
approximately 1/2 to 1 acre lots. There will be 14 single family lots. The lots will cover
approximately 8 acres of the total 44 acre site. There will be approximately 7 acres of open space
dedicated to the Weld County library and an additional 3 acres are dedicated for a Weld County
library site at the south end of the property. At the north end of the property approximately 2
acres are proposed for a future civic use. Approximately 2 acres at the north end of the site will be
reserved for a civic type use. Possible uses could be fire, police, or sheriff facilities, or a
recreation center. The library site will anchor the south end of the site, and will preserve existing
wetlands as open space, which will add to the character of the library site and neighborhood.
The remainder of the site will become part of a private, common,planned open space. The
private lake will allow non- motorized recreation. Meadow Vale Farm Phase II is being planned
to compliment Meadow Vale Farm, the project immediately west of this site.
Homes will be designed to be appropriate to locational considerations, such as street patterns,
adjacent uses, and location of project amenity areas. A design theme will be developed for the
project, which will reinforce views of the front range or private lake.
II. OPEN SPACE
A. Overall Concept:
A substantial amount of open space is proposed as part of the development (68% of the site). The
MUD requires that 30% of the site be left as open space. The private open space will include a
lake,park, and trail system. A trail connecting Meadow Vale Farm and Meadow Vale Farm Phase
II to the end of the private lake is proposed along the south end of the property. The area
dedicated as Weld County Open Space is intended to be preserved in its current natural state
(primarily wetlands). The upland open spaces will be temporarily irrigated to supplement rainfall
as required to establish natural turf grasses. Limited areas of irrigated tall fescue or bluegrass may
be provided in high use pedestrian areas. Maintenance of these open spaces will be addressed
through a Home Owners Association.
Uses in the open space will be informal, unprogrammed activities, such as picnicking,walking,
and bicycling. The private lake will allow for non-motorized recreation.
III. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER
A. Neighborhood Structure:
The site has been planned for a maximum of 14 lots at total build out. Homes will be carefully
situated on the lot to preserve views and minimize bulk and mass.
B. Architecture/Types of Residential Units and Accessory Structures:
All homes will be single family detached residences . Homes will be a minimum of 1600 square
feet, excluding basement. They will have a minimum two car garage and a maximum height of
forty (40) feet. The overall architectural concepts will emphasize the following:
1. Building form and character shall be established such that they present a compatible overall
neighborhood character.
2. Front, rear and side elevations of structures will be detailed to provide visual interest and avoid
unattractive views from adjoining streets, open space and properties.
3. Roofing materials, windows,building materials and finish, will be coordinated to achieve a
cohesive appearance.
4. Accessory structures will be permitted for the purposes of storage. Accessory structures will
be a maximum of 600 square feet and be designed to be compatible with the residential
architecture. Accessory structures will be setback a minimum of 10' from the property lines.
IV. WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
A. Water and sewer service will be provided by the Left Hand Water District. A 16" main exists
near SH119. A 4" main will be stubbed out of to this property through Meadow Vale Farm.
B. Irrigation water will be raw water that will be supplied through the private lake located at the
Southeast corner of the site. Water will be pumped to individual units though a series of
individual sub-surface water pipes. The pumping system will be jointly owned by Meadow Vale
Farm, the Elms at Meadow Vale, and Meadow Vale Farm Phase II. A stub will be provided at
each single family property and will be metered.
B. Sanitary Sewer will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District in Longmont. A 10"
diameter sewer main exits at Meadow Vale Farm and will be extended to this subdivision in an
alignment crossing WCR 5.5.
C. The developer will be responsible for design and construction of water and sewer throughout
the subdivision.
2
V. STREETS
There is one level of street provided, a local street. The street will be dedicated to Weld County.
This street will be constructed to Weld County MUD Street cross section standards.
Access to the project site will be from County Road 5 1/2 (100' ROW).
A. Local:
The Local street will be a publicly dedicated street and will provide access to all lots of the
subdivision. This street will be designed within a 40 foot flowline dimension, with curb and
gutter and a 4' concrete attached sidewalk on each side. The ROW will be 60 feet. This cross
section meets Weld County MUD standards. All residential lots will access from the internal local
street, with no direct access to WCR 5.5.
B. County Road 5.5:
WCR 5.5 has already been improved to collector status along the project frontage. County Road
5.5 is in conformance with Weld County MUD Standards. County Road 5 1/2 has been dedicated
to Weld County and has been designed to meet a load of 85,000 pounds.
VI. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
A network of pedestrian circulation routes will be provided for residents along streets in the form
- of paved attached sidewalks as well as an informal trail system.
VII. STORM DRAINAGE
The site slopes from the west to the east. This natural drainage pattern will be preserved. The
existing pond on site will collect storm water runoff and will be used for irrigation. The existing
pond is 10 acres in size and will overflow into a 6 acre pond northeast of this property through a
12" pipe. The 6 acre pond will overflow into the River through a 12" pipe.
VIII. SOILS
The soils found on this site have been classified into two different types by the Soil Conservation
Service. The first type of soil consists primarily of loamy or clayey surface underlain by sand and
or gravel. The water table is at or near the surface in these area and is often subject to flooding.
The second type of soil is well drained and also prone to flooding. Foundations would need to be
engineered in order to make development possible.
IX. SIGNS
A. One permanent project identification sign will be located at the site entrance. The sign shall
be a maximum of 32 square feet per face or a total of 128 sf of total sign face. The sign area shall
be measured by determining the sum of the area of each square, rectangle, triangle, portion of a
- circle, or any combination which creates the smallest single continuous perimeter enclosing the
extreme limits of the message surface including project letters and logo. The sign will be ground
mounted sign and will be illuminated with internal lighting or indirect ground illumination.
B. All other signs shall conform with section 42 of the Weld County zoning ordinance pertaining
to R-1 residential.
3
X. WATER COURSES AND DITCHES
There are no irrigation ditches on this property. There are no aquifer recharge areas on this
property. The existing pond will be maintained.
XI. EXISTING STRUCTURES
There are no existing structures on the property.
XII. COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS
The site contains no known valuable commercial mineral deposits. Gravel has been mined
from the site. There are no existing gas or oil wells on the property.
XIII. FLOODPLAIN, GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS
A portion of the property is in the 100 year floodplain, however there are no know geological
hazards or airport overlay districts. Fill has been added to the site to raise the lots out of the 100
year floodplain. There are no known oil or gas deposits on the site.
XIV. ADJACENT LAND USES
A. The surrounding land uses are generally agriculture or residential. To the west is Meadow
Vale Farm (1 acre residential lots), to the northwest is the Elms at Meadow Vale (residential), to
the south State Hwy. 119, to the northeast are agricultural uses, there is an existing pond to the
east.
All potential residents will be made aware of agricultural related noise and/or odor that can be
expected from adjacent properties.
Weld County recognizes the 'right to farm'. In order to validate this recognition Weld County has
established an example covenant which should be incorporated on all pertinent land use plats. The
Depai lment of Planning Services will require the covenant to appear on the final recorded plat.
XV. LANDSCAPING AND PERIMETER TREATMENTS
A. Overall Concept:
Landscaping will be designed as a natural theme. Most areas will be developed using indigenous
grasses, trees and shrubs in the open space. Areas will be irrigated on a supplemental basis in
order to facilitate quick establishment, and thereafter on an as needed basis to maintain a healthy
landscape.
4
B. Buffering:
The perimeter of the site will be buffered through landscaping and/or fencing within common
open spaces. Buffering will be accomplished with evergreen trees, shrubs, canopy trees or other
appropriate landscape elements.
C. Park:
A park will be incorporated into the project towards the north end of property. This park will be
maintained in its natural state and will allow for passive types of recreation.
D. Fencing:
Rear yard fencing will be permitted and will have to conform to certain guidelines designed to
maintain a high level of quality to the open space edge.
E. Signage:
Entrance and identification sign walls will be designed to market the property as well as to
provide permanent identification of the community. The entrance walls will be located at the
entrance and will be constructed of materials compatible with the subdivision character. Signs
will be constructed to meet the R-1 zone district standards.
F. Walks:
Pedestrian circulation to be accommodated through attached sidewalks and informal trails.
XVI. FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION
FIRE: The project falls within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The project will meet
the standards established by the district including the following:
1. Fire Flow of 1,000 gpm at 20 psi or higher.
2. All homes will be less than 3,600 square feet.
3. Maintain a vertical clearance above all roads of 13'-6"
4. All areas will be served with fire hydrants. Locations will be determined at the time utility
plans are submitted.
5. All streets and homes will be marked with names and addresses.
POLICE: Police protection will be provided by the Weld County Sheriffs Department.
XVII. MAINTENANCE
All common landscape areas will be maintained by a private Home Owner's Association, (HOA).
A HOA will be established as part of this development, and will be funded through assessment of
annual dues.
5
1-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1. Noise and Vibration:
Minimal disturbance shall occur, such as glare, noise, vibration, as measured from the property •
line, so as to cause an impact on abutting properties in conjunction with the residential uses
associated with this development.
2. Smoke, Dust and Odors:
The contractor is responsible for dust control, and it shall be the contractor's responsibility to
provide the necessary equipment and materials to satisfactorily control dust at all times, water
shall be used as the dust palliative where required. The cost for dust control should be included in
the appropriate unit costs.
3. Heat, Light and Glare:
Building materials should not create excessive glare. If highly reflective building materials are
proposed, such as aluminum, unpainted metal and reflective glass, the potential for glare from
such materials will be evaluated to determine whether or not the glare would create a significant
adverse impact on the adjacent property owners, neighborhood or community in
terms of vehicular safety, outdoor activities and enjoyment of views. If so, such
materials shall not be permitted.
4. Visual/Aesthetic Impacts:
The large 1/2 to 1 acre residential lots are intended to be upscale and are surrounded by significant
open space on the property. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with the existing uses
across County Road 5.5.
5. Electrical Interference:
Any electrical interference caused by this development will be insignificant.
6. Water Pollution:
All homeowners within this development shall conform to all applicable local, state and federal
laws dealing with water pollution. Bodies of water will be protected from sedimentation and
pollutant run-off during construction through the use of best management practices. This would
include, but is not limited to, silt fencing, hay bales, berms, and rapid revegetaion of disturbed
surfaces.
4,
7. Waste Water Disposal:
Sanitary Sewer will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District in Longmont.
8. Wetland Removal:
No wetlands will be removed during development of this property. Refer to Noxious Weed
Control Plan Recommendations in text.
9. Erosion and Sedimentation:
The necessary precautions will be taken to minimize the amount of erosion and sedimentation that
could possible occur during construction. The pond on the property will be used to filter the water
before it returns to the river system. The pond is a mined out gravel pit.
10. Excavating, Filling and Grading:
Grading will be done in such a manner as to minimize the impact to the adjacent property owners
and vegetation.
11. Drilling, Ditching and Dredging:
These practices are not expected to be necessary as part of this development.
12. Air Pollution:
This development will conform to all applicable local, state and federal air quality regulations and
standards, including, but not limited to, those regulating odor, dust, fumes or gases which are
noxious, toxic or corrosive, and suspended solid or liquid particles.
13. Solid Waste:
Solid waste will be properly disposed of in the Weld County Landfill.
14. Wildlife Removal:
There are currently no significant signs that any wildlife will need to be removed. No Prairie
Dogs have been seen on the property.
15. Natural Vegetation Removal:
Every reasonable effort will be made to disturb as little existing vegetation as possible.
16. Radiation/Radioactive Material:
There is no reason to suggest that any radiation/radioactive material will ever be present at this
site.
17. Drinking Water Source:
The Left Hand Water District will provide the potable water for this project.
SERVICE PROVISION IMPACTS
1. Traffic Impact:
Due to the small number of lots there will be minimal traffic impacts. A traffic impact report has
been provided by the developer.
2. Schools:
A proposed elementary school site has been planned within the Meadow Vale Farm PUD. A total
of 10 students (K-12) are anticipated from the 14 single-family lots in this development. Students
would attend: Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle School, and Skyline High School under
present school boundaries.
3. Law Enforcement, Fire Protection, and Ambulance:
1.7 acres on this property are proposed for a potential civic use, which could include fire
protection or law enforcement. This site falls within the Mountain View Fire Protection District
and the Weld County Sheriffs Department.
4. Transportation:
The adjacent County Road 5.5 and the proposed local street on the property are adequate to meet
the requirements of the proposed site. A variety of transportation options are included to provide
a choice of travel methods for residents. Walking, bicycling, and vehicular transportation are
accomodated to provide efficient and safe transportation within the area.
Q
(i„eL.&4ts ?row ty £1 rs- avers soo 'Pat) I
.nits ...ILEA: 4F7000
„ccount# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel# #Bldgs
R7009098 CAMPBELL THOMAS G&CAROLYN R 1MVF L3 BLK3 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 6/10/98 131304303003 1
SITUS:2133 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 34,443 Acres: 0.79 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7008396 DEITESFELD REX R&KAREN A 1MVF L3 BLK1 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 1/30/98 131304301003 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 1ST FG BLK:1 LOT:3
SF: 46,782 Acres: 1.07 Sites: 217 w ^+ertoOw (.klcF 714 Lo../c•--oar Bosoy Override: No
R7009198 ELARI EDWARD W&KOLLETTE N 1MVF L4 BLK3 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 6/15/98 131304303004 1
SITUS:2157 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 36,553 Acres: 0.84 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
J8798 EYK JAMES A&YVONNE D 1MVF L4 BLK2 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 10/30/96 131304302004 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 1ST FG BLK:2 LOT:4
SF: 43,407 Acres: 1.00 sites: 1.00 204"2- D LIJE nro )7,( L,o..icAle.,r SosOc Override: No
R7008198 GETZSCHMAN DANIEL R&SUSAN J 1MVF L1 BLK1 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 7/30/97 131304301001 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 1ST FG BLK:1 LOT:1
SF: 43,792 Acres: 1.01 Sites: 213o fr*4o.no !/AL . Ka( Lo+'c.-o✓r-$0504 Override: No
R7008698 GONZALES REUBEN J&CYNTHIA A 1MVF L3 BLK2 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 10/30/96 131304302003 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 1ST FG BLK:2 LOT:3
SF: 43,647 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 2O9O mispauc Mro lad LooGrto..rgQSDw Override: No
R7008498 HULBERT MARVIN D&KAREN S 1MVF L1 BLK2 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 6/16/97 131304302001 2
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 1ST FG BLK:2 LOT:1
SF: 45,691 Acres: 1.05 Sites: 1.00 2.13$ BLJt A17-Ai Rd Lo^JGma.,r $o≤by Override: No
R7308998 MARTINEZ MAX J&CINDY L 1MVF L2 BLK3 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 2/10/99 131304303002 0
2ocG /yEAPO•0 ✓RLE lac( Lo 0GnoOTFOSW
SF: 32,970 Acres: 0.76 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
I J8898 MITCHELL RUTH-MARIE 1MVF L1 BLK3 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 2/21/97 131304303001 1
SITUS: BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 805044
SF: 33,219 Acres: 0.76 Sites: 1.00 20$-+ $CJE .r+-A) Rd Lo roai+oo7 g0S0Y Override: No
R7008598 VICARS SUSAN E 1MVF L2 BLK2 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 3/25/97 131304302002 1
SITUS:2118 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 42,138 Acres: 0.97 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7008298 WAGNER KAREN A 1MVF L2 BLK1 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #1 2/25/99 131304301002 1
SITUS:2154 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80502
SF: 44,778 Acres: 1.03 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
03-May-99 .,e -i
Accounts LEA: 4F7002 I
Account# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel # # Bldgs
R7013998 ADLER DENNIS F&JO ANNE 2MVF L8 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 6/24/97 131304316008 7
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:8
SF: 74,923 Acres: 1.72 Sites: ZoYC Byrt& oco //ALE rzd L0.06..-10..6--: Override: No
43oseW
R7014098 ADLER DENNIS F&JO ANNE 2MVF L9 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 6/24/97 131304316009 2
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:9
SF: 67,954 Acres: 1.56 Sites: Override: No
R7012198 BLACK LISA D 2MVF L5 BLK13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/8/98 131304313005 0
SF: 54,450 Acres: 1.25 Sites: 1.00 20 35 U0+1{ Ft. LD.v G^^o+,7. Co. BOSOM Override: No
F"^11398 FENTON DENISE 2MVF L9 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 11/27/98 131304311009 0
Z 19j �
SF: 43,560 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 r �L.a STZ K L 0 ocMa.c7- go ov Override: No
R7011998 FENTON DENISE 2MVF L3 BLK13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 11/27/98 131304313003 0
203y JCK PL d.O Nf^n -07- aOSO4
SF: 50,530 Acres: 1.16 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7012098 FRONZMGE CUSTQM/UILDERS INC 2MV L4 K13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 7/31/98 131304313004 1
NS F: /�R(IJ 2,708 res: 1.21 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7013598 GOLDEN JAMES R 2MVF L4 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/15/98 131304316004 0
SITUS:2359 HOMESTEAD PLACE LONGMONT 80501
SF: 43,124 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7013198 HAGGARD ROBERT M 2MVF L4 BLK15 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/31/98 131304315004 0
2250 nEOPO v7 ✓..LE 12ot L0O6^+o€'
SF: 37,897 Acres: 0.87 Sites: 1.00 f?0so4 Override: No
P- 11698 HARBUZ ED&SUE 2MVF L3 BLK12 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 6/29/98 131304312003 0
SITUS:MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 38,333 Acres: 0.88 Sites: 1.00 ?AG ^lMOOMJ 1/444.-E Rd L`Ds' 1.44"'T Y0.L09/ Override: No
R7010698 LIZANNA HOMES INC 2MVF L2 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 8/7/98 131304311002 0
2)C$ fr25420NCAl2K PL LONorwi
SF: 36 590 Acres: 0.84 Sites: 1.00 $0SO4 Override: No
R7011598 LIZANNA HOMES INC 2MVF L2 BLK12 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 7/8/98 131304312002 0
20 go rher.00,J YA-E Pal LoNastwr gO QV
SF: 40,075 Acres: 0.92 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7011098 LOGSDON BOYCE W 2MVF L6 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 9/15/98 131304311006 0
21(.1/ MEAO0'' LPrRK PC-. Lo,16,novi
SF: 39.640 Acres: 0.91 Sites: 1.00 W°579 ti Override: No
03-May-99 1 of 4
,- count/F IVdllle Leyal ✓caLl 1pttuu - - ..
87012998 / MALCOLM HOWARD B&COLLEEN 2MVF L2 ELM5 ME a VALE FARM PUD#2 1/29/99 131304315002 , 0
SITUS:2208 MEADOVi. .ALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 39,640 Acres: 0.91 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7011498 MARTINEZ JOSEPH R&DIANA L 2MVF L1 BLK12 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/4/98 131304312001 1
Zl77ro (4@tool° ✓M LS 02a Le.ii c^n.•2r'
SF: 36,590 Acres: 0.84 Sites: 1.00 80.504 Override: No
R7011298 MCVICKER MICHAEL P&BARBARA S 2MVF LB BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 6/19/98 131304311008 0
SITUS:2173 MEADOWLARK PL LONGMONT 80504
SF: 40,946 Acres: 0.94 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7012698 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L4 BLK14 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304314004 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD2ND FG BLK:14BLK:14 LOT:4
SF: 65,776 Acres: 1.51 Sites: 1.00 =/ -2211 MC^^ADO¢/ 4s cS )2J LaNGnror.T override: No
R7013498 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVE_L3 BLK16 MEADOW-VALE FARM PUD#2 131304316003 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:3
SF: 39,204 Acres: 0.90 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7013698 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L5 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304316005 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:5
SF: 35,719 Acres: 0.82 Sites: 1.00 - Override: No
R7013898 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L7 BLK16/MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304316007 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:7
SF: 55,757 Acres: 1.28 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7012598 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L3 BLK14 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304314003 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:14 LOT:3
SF: 53,579 Acres: 1.23 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
87013798 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L6 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304316006 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:6
SF: 50,094 Acres: 1.15 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
87012798 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L5 BLK14 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304314005 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:14 LOT:5
SF: 57,064 Acres: 1.31 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
87013298 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L1 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304316001 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:16 LOT:1
SF: 35,719 Acres: 0.82 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
87012498 MEADOW VALE FARM INC 2MVF L2 BLK14 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 131304314002 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:14 LOT:2
SF: 44,431 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7011798 N M T CONSTRUCTION LLC 2MVF L1 BLK13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 9/9/98 1313043130W 1
?DO )CK Pc Loft-ice-0.1-T
SF: 44,431 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 SO.>OL Override: No
03-May-99 2 of 4
Account# Name Legal Description Sale.Dt Parcel # # Bldgs
I
R7010598 NJD INC 2MVF L1 BLK11 MEA. .J VALE FARM PUD#2----- 7/17/98 131304311001 ' 1
SITUS:2190 MEADOW LARK PL LONGMONT 80501
SF: 37,026 Acres: 0.85 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7010298 ROBERTSON CHARLES O&LYNDA M 2MVF L1 BLK10 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/4/98 131304310001 1
SITUS:2186 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 36,155 Acres: 0.83 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7010498 SCHLAGEL GERALD E&DARLENE F 2MVF L3 BLK10 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 11/10/98 131304310003 1
SITUS:2220 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 40,075 Acres: 0.92 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7011898 SIGG STANLEY J&DIANA L 2MVF L2 BLK13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/15/98 131304313002 0
SITUS:2040 JCK PLACE LONGMONT 80501
SF: 52,272 Acres: 1.20 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
F '2398 STALLINGS HAL 2MVF L1 BLK14 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/15/98 131304314001 0
2143 ^'EFDp'O t/.4‘,E Pci Levcn.o..r
SF: 46,609 Acres: 1.07 Sites: 1.00 $Oyoy Override: No
R7012898 STALLINGS HAL 2MVF L1 BLK15 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/21/98 131304315001 0
SITUS:2178 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80501
SF: 44,867 Acres: 1.03 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7013398 STALLINGS HAL 2MVF L2 BLK16 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 12/15/98 131304316002 0
SF: 41,818 Acres: 0.96 Sites: 1.00 Z3) Uo ME51P C'rmv 4 P nL• LO NC
Override: No
BO Sou_
R7013098 STEMBER MICHAEL J&BARBARA S 2MVF L3 BLK15 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 1/6/99 131304315003 0
2g$ 2Z32. 1"4")" VALE gel
SF: 38,768 Acres: 0.69 Sites: 1.00 Le . cmem', f3 V orot{ Override: No
R7011198 STIPPICH JOHN F&SUSAN D 2MVF L7 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 1/26/99 131304311007 0
al SS.HEA.00uf l.4f≥1t PL, Le uC.V.eai
SF: 40,075 Acres: 0.92 Sites: 1.00 $50501-1 Override: No
r '2298 SUNBERG KEVIN P&JANA L 2MVF L6 BLK13 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 6/17/98 131304313006 1
SITUS:2067 PL LONGMONT 80504
SF: 41,818 Acres: 0.96 Sites: 1.00 ZO<1 Tex ?L. Lo .oc^^o^-9 go.>o'4 Override: No
R7010898 SWALLOW DEAN 2MVF L4 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 7/31/98 131304311004 0
2lLg M. AD0‘O Eitir
SF: 37,897 Acres: 0.87 Sites: 1.00 L.a.1c FL, Lo oarr.ar Override: No
R7010798 RD MAI ENT INC 2MVF L3 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 9/9/98 131304311003 1
SF: 35,7 9 Acres: 0.82 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7010998 VINTON GREGORY W&NANCY J 2MVF L5 BLK11 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 7/15/98 131304311005 1
21 jj T,F4DYw L41≥N PL,
SF: 36,590 Acres: 0.84 Sites: 1.00 Lo Override: No
03-May-99 3 of 4
Account# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel # 'dgs
R7010398 WARD ROBERT L&SARA L 2MVF L2 BLK10 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 9/15/98 131304310002 0
2204 MEaootl ci t gel
SF: 35,719 Acres: 0.82 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
•
03-May-99 4 of 4
Accounts ' .EA: 4F7001
I
Account# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel # #Bldgs
R7010098 ABENDSCHEIN ANDREW L&JEAN M 2MVF L3 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 8/10/98 131304308003 1
SITUS:2020 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 40,414 Acres: 0.93 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7010198 ALDERMAN STEVE 2MVF L1 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 1/20/98 131304309001 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:9 LOT:1
SF: 43,485 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 203:1 44 EA P°,41Va LE nd Lo%Icron ?ooav Override: No
R7314498 BAUTSCH MARY&MEGA VIVIAN 2MVF L4 BLK4 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 10/20/97 131305404004 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:4 LOT:4
SF: 42,963 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 1922 13LVE JHr.) 122 LoJJ&no"'r $o$OY Override: No
P" '5598 BLOSSOM MICHAEL J 2MVF L4 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 10/28/98 131305408004 1
SITUS: 1990 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 44,575 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 1990 fr1 400w Vogt-g R4- I_o*lc—o"J Override: No
R'315698 BLUE CHIP HOMES LLC 2MVF L5 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/4/98 131305408005 1
2'
SF: 44,210 Acres: 1.01 Sites: 1.00 1462 m scow ✓4 LE t2d Looc�o"rr Override: No
P7009398 BOWERS BRIAN C&LINDA F 2MVF Lt BLK5 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 8/20/98 131304305001 . 1
SF: 40,297 Acres: 0.93 Sites: 1.00 2043 Is Los. rrra Rd LO.Jc.-,o„T Sesa4 Override: No
R?014698 BRAZILLE ARTHUR WAYNE&KIMBERLY A 2MVF L2 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 6/18/98 131305406002 1
SITUS: 1959 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 43,502 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7014798 BUSTILLOS ALBION SR&CAROLINE C 2MVF L3 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 8/1/97 131305406003 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:6 LOT:3
SF: 43,590 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 Iql$ SLOE 'emir 121 Lo&G..,e.j7 $O Ow Override: No
F 1298 CORNELL JAY&DEBRA A 2MVF L2 BLK4 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/15/97 131305404002 1
200u ;LYE I't7.0 Rd Lo..ic..,00r $'oy04
SF: 42,743 Acres: 0.98 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7015498 EASTMAN GEORGE EUGENE&MARILYLN JEAN 2MVF L4 BLK7 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 11/3/97 131305407004 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:7 LOT:4
SF: 43.328 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 1312. 3 LOE mi-N) Ror Lo.0 G-+..er'Sotov Override: No
R7009698 EWER WILLIAM A&JANE G 2MVF L4 BLK5 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 11/21/97 131304305004 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:5 LOT:4
SF: 41,804 Acres: 0.96 Sites: 1.00 ZO11, I3LVE Mro Pd LO.0 4"'no+rr IO$O4 Override: No
F7016398 FREDERIKSEN ROBERT J&LINDA L 2MVF L12 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 8/21/98 131305408012 1
13 2.0 MEaD°w f/4LE Rd 1446-. sS Yusoc(
SF: 45,139 Acres: 1.04 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
03-May-99 1 of 4
Account# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel # # Bldgs
I
87709898 GIROUX RICHARD J&SHARON M 2MVF L1 BLK8 MEAD,-.VALE FARM PUD #2 1/12/98 131304308001 1 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:8 LOT:1
SF: 43,508 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 20 L8 ME4Poc VALc Tact A u6moor go,:Ivy Override: No
R7016498 GREB VINCENT W 2MVF L13 BLK8 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 9/28/98 131305408013 1
11 Qg ME4p0cO &LER"- Lo -tia-a-tp..07-git.934
SF: 45,015 Acres: 1.03 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7316898 HANKS JUDSON T 2MVF L4 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 7/24/98 131305409004 0
SITUS: 1915 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 43,026 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7014998 K&M MILLER PROPERTIES LIMITED PART 2MVF L5 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/15/97 131305406005 3
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:6 LOT:5
SF: 43,431 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 / g47 Bt_v@ nry g41 Lo oc•-•o,i r Override: No
f 3998 KING PAUL R&CAROL J 2MVF L5 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 2/27/98 131305409005 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:9 LOT:5
SF: 42,969 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 Iill r-1E4 pro VALE RJJ Lo.Jcs,,,,A geSroy Override: No
R7009498 LANGLEY ROBERT D&DEBBIE L 2MVF L2 BLK5 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/15/97 131304305002 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:5 LOT:2
SF: 41,882 Acres: 0.96 Sites: 1.00 Zo09 BLUE M R Loa9Gr+our Override: No
R7015398 LARSON-MILLER JEANIE 2MVF L3 BLK7 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 7/10/98 131305407003 1
SITUS: 1896 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 44,318 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7015898 LASKO DARREN D&KIMBERLEE D 2MVF L7 BLK8 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 8/24/98 131305408007 1
SITUS: 1926 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 51,751 Acres: 1.19 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
87016098 LUTHYE RAY E&TERESA L 2MVF L9 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/29/98 131305408009 1
SITUS: 1886 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80503
SF: 53,111 Acres: 1.22 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
. 6598 MARRIOTT TODD W&STACEY 2MVF L14 BLK8 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 7/30/98 131305408014 1
SITUS: 1774 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 48,461 Acres: 1.11 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7009998 MASON STEVEN M&CINDA J 2MVF L2 BLK8 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 8/7/98 131304308002 1
SITUS:2046 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
•
SF: 37,331 Acres: 0.86 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7015798 N M T CONSTRUCTION LLC 2MVF L6 BLK8 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 4/14/98 131305408006 1
SITUS: 1940 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 44,491 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7014398 PIERCE FRANK R JR 2MVF L3 BLK4 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 1/30/98 131305404003 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:4 LOT:3
SF: 42,351 Acres: 0.97 Sites: 1.00 On 13LVE r,o Rd &OAJCIMO a T Override: No
C3-May-99 2 of 4
Account# ; Name Legal Descriptior Sale Dt Parcel # P lgs
R7015998 ROBLES GREGORIO&HIDALLA 2MVF L8 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 12/5/97 131305408008 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:8 LOT:8
SF: 56,877 Acres: 1.31 Sites: 1.00 I 98 'ref r»+aov Val 124 Lauano✓t gvSoi Override: No
87316198 SCHIFERL EUGENE M&ANNE R 2MVF L10 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 1/20/98 131305408010 1
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:8 LOT:10
SF: 46,435 Acres: 1.07 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7016698 SCHLITZ ROBERT A&VICKIE L 2MVF L2 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 5/15/98 131305409002 1
SITUS: 1993 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 43,284 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7015098 SCHMIDT RODNEY J&CINDY S 2MVF L6 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 SITUS: 1/28/98 131305406006 1
1873 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 805040000
SF: 49,836 Acres: 1.14 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
Rt..i 5298 SCHROEDER JOHN M& 2MVF L2 BLK7 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 10/23/98 131305407002 1
IS`-l2 Buie-iE nar&u rid LOU6#+oA'J W0SO4
SF: 44,315 Acres: 1.02 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R'014898 SCHULTZ D TED JR&CECILIA A 2MVF L4 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 7/1/97 131305406004 1
SITUS: 1921 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 43,636 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7009298 SEAVER JAY R&ANNETTE 2MVF L1 BLK4 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 3/10/98 131304304001 1
SITUS:2010 BLUE MOUNTAIN RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 42,509 Acres: 0.98 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7009598 SHEETS GREGORY W 2MVF L3 BLK5 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 6/12/98 131304305003 1
SITUS:2000 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 44,111 Acres: 1.01 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7016798 STANTON RANDALL G&BARBARA T 2MVF L3 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2---- 3/16/98 131305409003 1
1951 r'EA GO.I MALE )Zq) Lawc-"e-ar
SF: 43,971 'Acres: 1.01 Sites: 1.00 go.g01-/ Override: No
Ri u16298 SUMNER FAMILY TRUST 2MVF L11 BLKB MEADOW VALE FARM PUD#2 4/24/98 131305408011 1
SITUS: 1842 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 45,282 Acres: 1.04 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
R7015198 SWALLOW DEAN 2MVF L1 BLK7 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 12/16/97 131305407001 0
SUB:MEADOW VALE FARM PUD 2ND FG BLK:7 LOT:1
SF: 43,502 Acres: 1.00 Sites: 1.00 14 04 13UVR PhYo 7724 L0U6^'e or gns'Y Override: No
R7014598 SWANSON ALAN E&ALICE E 2MVF L1 BLK6 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2---- 3/4/98 131305406001 1
SF: 51,466 Acres: 1.18 Sites: 1.00 /97i Bu0C- /'+rN 72O! LA✓orno.'r 3os09 Override: No
R7017098 WARD ROBERT L&SARA L 2MVF L6 BLK9 MEADOW VALE FARM PUD #2 10/29/97 131305409006 2
SITUS: 1805 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80501
SF: 43,192 Acres: 0.99 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
C3-May-99 3 of 4
Acoount# Name Legal Description Sale Dt Parcel # # Bldgs
i I
R7009798 WHITE JOHN E&WILMA K 2MVF L5 BLK5 MEAL .J VALE FARM PUD #2 11/20/98 131304305005 1
SITUS:2032 MEADOW VALE RD LONGMONT 80504
SF: 36,178 Acres: 0.83 Sites: 1.00 Override: No
03-May-99 4 of 4
y
2/2/99
tituo-W Vidt F4444,41414/44. $(104
for circulation within subdivision only
Lot& °: Street Street Name Head pt Last Name, ,Phone 'Rest of-Family.
Pets-:**.-
Block# Number ' '. Household -: :. . '
B8 L3 '2020 Meadow Vale Rd.:._:. Andy&Jean ' Abendschein' 485-0943 - Austin;&Conner
616 L9 11279 Weld County Rd 5.5 ,Dennis& JoAnn Adler 772-5322
B9 L1 2031 Meadow Vale Rd _Steve: .. .. :.- Alderman ' 651=1733 Scott .
B4 L4 1982 Blue Mountain Rd. Mary Beutsch 678-8293 Rocky
Vivian Mega
'B8 L4 • 1990 Meadow Vale Rd.: Mike ' : Blossom , • 485-8286 -
B3 L1 2043 Blue Mountain Rd. Brian & Linda Bowers 776-3449 Rick&Alex
B6 L2.*'•::' 1959 blue Mountain Rd.' Wayne Kim • : - Brazille; :;• 651-7058 Matthew& :
.: ' , Morgan ..
B6 L3 1935 Blue Mountain Rd. Albino & Caroline Bustillos 776-8364 Albino Jr, Lenny,
774-1822 Alex, Eric&
Cassandra
B3 L3 .- 2133 Blue Mountain Rd: ' Tom& Carolyn Camp bell 675-Q751 . ..
B4 L2 2004 Blue Mountain Rd. Jay & Debra Cornell 776-2331 Jared &James
B1 13 .: , . 2174 Meadow Vale Rd.. Rex& Karen Deitesfled 684-9599 , Ryan&!Keldyrs . --Tender
B7 L4 1872 Blue Mountain Rd. George &Marilyn Eastman 684-8151
:B5.L3 ••': 2000 Meadow Vale Rd, Deborah Edgar--. . 702-9360
..' . . Greg Sheets' . . . . .
B3 L4 2157 Blue Mountain Rd. Eddie & Kollette Elari :678-9007 Gianna
B5 L4 `2016 Meadow Vale:Rd., ', Bill &Jane.. Ewer :: ' 682-2769 Becca& Erin
B2 L4 2062 Blue Mountain Rd. Jim & Yvonne Eyk 772-0261 Max&
Abby
B8 L12 '`' 1820 Meadow Vale Rd. Bob&Linda Fredriksen • 682.5289
B1 L1 2130 Meadow Vale Rd. Dan & Sue Getzschman 772-7847 Eric& Danelle Penny&
Rudy
B2 L3 2090 Blue Mountain Rd. ' Reuben&Cindy Gonzales • 6517246 ..1Bryan:&'Kristen
B8 L13 1798 Meadow Vale Rd. Vince& Shauna Greb Justin & Brianne Chelsea
B2 L1..- ` 2138 Blue Mountain n'Rd. Mary&Karen Hulbert 682-5733 Brett&Tracy
B9 L5 1877 Meadow Vale Rd. Paul & Carol King 776-7290
B7 L2 1942 Blue'Mountain::Rd. Ee Wah :`.. Koh .' . ., 485-7128 .
; Mark 'Schroeder
B5 L2 2009 Blue Mountain Rd. Rob & Deb Langley Bobby, Kenny,
Keean, Darren &
Krissy
B8.L7 1926 Meadow Vale Rd. Darren&Kim Lasko 776-7885 ' . : Rocky&
Kahzee
68 L9 1886 Meadow Vale Rd. Ray & Teresa Luthye 774-0679
B8 L14 1774 Meadow Vale Rd.' Todd& Stacy Mariott. 682-9432 Haley, John,
_. Davis&Dylan
B12 L1 2056 Meadow Vale Rd. Ruben& Diana Martinez
38 L2 2046 Meadow Vale Rd: Steven&Cindi Mason 772.6418 Aaron&Jane
- B7 L3 1896 Blue Mountain Rd. Dan &Jeanie Miller 485-0878 Obie
B6 L5 1897 Blue Mountain Rd. Maryann Miller, 581-0520
Steve Miller
Page 1
2/2/99
Lot& ` Street Street Name '' °Head of Last Name Phone Rest of Family Pets
Block# Number Household Frosty
L1 2087 Blue Mountain Rd. Ruth Mitchell 772-7947 ! y
Pierce 678-0969 Sammie &
B4 L3 1998 Blue Mountain Rd. Frank Scoop
810 L1 2186 Meadow Vale Rd.. Charlie&Lynda Robertson 651-7362 Matt, Ryan&
B8 L8 1908 Meadow Vale Rd. Greg & Hidalea Robles 678-1127 Jaquelin,
Rosa,
set& Greg
88 L10 1868 Meadow Vale Rd. Eugene&Anne Schiferd 772-5789 Taz,
810 L3 2220 Meadow Vale Rd. Jerry& Darlene Schlegel 682-0520 Nugget&
Sabrina
89 L2 1993 Meadow Vale Rd. Bob&Vickie • Schlitz 776-2566
• Jasmin
B6 L6 1873 Blue Mountain Rd. Rod & Cindy Schmidt 774-1822 Kristine, Erika, &
Rick
B6 L4 1921 Blue Mountain Rd. Ted & Cecilia Schultz 774-8638 RyRyan,ron Adam,
am,
Casey
B4 L1 2010 Blue Mountain Rd. Jay&Annette Seaver 678-8612 Tyler,
JaysoN Kenny,
Kayla & Lindsea
Smith 702-1787 Elizabeth&
812 L2 2080 Meadow Vale Rd. John&Liz Brianna
B9 L3 1957 Meadow Vale Rd. Randall & Barb Stanton 682-5713 CCole, Bridget&
lair
88 L11 1842 Meadow Vale Rd. Chuck& Gale Sumner 684-8616
B13 L6 2067 JCK Kevin &Jana Sunberg 682-2714 M oicchae e, Ryan G.G.
lly
86 LI 1971 Blue Mountain Rd Alan&Alice Swanson 772-1159
5 Reid Wendy &
82 L2 2118 Blue Mountain Rd. Susie Beans
Vinton 678-8821 Jim,Brian,
611 L5 2135 Meadowlark PL Greg &Nancy Matthew&Enn'
B9 L6 1805 Meadow Vale Rd. Bob & Sara Ward 684-8737 Brian & Rebecea
65 L5 , 2032 Meadow Vale Rd. John&Wilma White 776-4802
Bear
Page 2
U io rbo'
p. B14 LI
oOPeNe p 2047 B13 i 4 BI3 L5 2143 21 i. B74 L3
S PACre tl /°° 0' 2055 2189 Bl4 L4
Pull)
.O 2211 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SfIE ly
000 �A B13 L3 •(.yam Ip3 ACRE
°�ov,a 40 •
�, 2034 a 20676 agar
�-_� BI4 L5 ,f
t Ov0 G¢ $unber9 00 \243 l�
v r t �O�). 2815 1 L1
,1 E36 L6 B6 L5
19]3 18W 86 L4 B13 L2
'l Schmidt Miller 1921 � 2040 812 L3 — Op''
.�00 ` Schultz 0613
935 2110 O 2208 2 ' �O
O Busbllos O p6l`1 BI2 L2 ° B16 L6
Smith m, BI5 L3 2385 BIG LI S■�
2132 8115 L4 616 L7 a ��
B6 L2 Opo 012 L1 61p 00 2250 ,5 2274 t
tl 1959 2056 ' • �,
1 Brazille lllti"`O"' •
° •
r
'7 L4 87 L3 Martinez O O BI6 L5 B16 L2
y,II 1972 1896 66 L1 2371 1379 ,I•
tY Eastman Moller
1971 • 0 ,! O
8942 Swanson BS LS ' •• • BI1 L6 • O � I:
2032
Koh
2141 BII L7 p•' Blfi LB •,
Schroeder White OS 2155 O 0jp•
OOp Adler
•
BI6 L4 B16 L3•• w�41 BI1 LS 2359 2366 p!
•
B7 L1 B5 L4 • 235 \\ O eX13ne�G •�
pp 1964 2016 •
/O Vinton 217318 7 X00 p 8F4..+ O
p6, • O Ewer O'
BII L9 T g
^9,14 • •
� 20004 L4
•• BI1 L4 2197 `•• 81619 pO OOG, m/%
1774 Edgar 2732 \ `, w 112]9
\ B1D L3 v. Adler
MaHot Sheets 1.
• O 84 L4 \O 2220 o• p L
t' riy 1982 `OO 4' Schlegel\•
O\` /Y BaWsch 81113 Quin r+6 �'
BS.13 �0.70 0 a :. Mega
2009 2750 811 L2 '( / ('PLw'
810 L2 ��
G:eb - e0 84 L3 !� Langley 2160 \04 1••OGO
1998 Bll L1
Pierce BSLI 4y•A 2190 e10L7
5£ 12 •
Bowers 2186 \ p •'
1800 'b B3 L1 Robertson O •
Frednksen 656 20042 2087
oq Mitchell \ p 1C
Ward CI
Comall B3 L2 • '�' O
BE_11
B•t LI 2111 O�Os •-" • +]• b
•
• 2010 z •
1842
—roar OL Seaver ip B2 L421333 �' ' �5l „�`J
8915 • 2062 Cam el (J_T O C26 tV
1877 '\ EYM B2 L3 c3 L4 Cal
King 209D EW� Mail p D 0' , • {
5 �JO Oy Genxale Center y.
• B2 L2 erd Os.
89 L4 Vicars O o• 0 •
QS
915
py 62 L7 B1 L3 ••o FUTUKE
•
E3 L9 •� B9 L3
De2138 2174
1886 1957 69 L2 o Hulbert deslled
LAmye Stanton 199389 3L1 LAKE.
$chlrtz Alderman '+ \•'• Bl L2
BO LB - \ 2156
108
Robblles B1 LI °
2130
B8 L9 •a• Getzschman •
• 1926 •
Lasko 88 L6 •
'
1940 BB L5
V. 1962 e990 EI L4 20203 69 L2 80601 ° •\O� O$O�,• 00
2046
Blossom Abendschel Mason $ .O
_: i. Soopodp
p y. • �9 -
'--OOTOO•� O O _ - ` Vii' Cam•
.
Meadow Vale Phase II
Weed Management Plan
Prepared for:
Floyd Oliver
Meadow Vale Farm
4465 Pioneer Dr.
Greeley, CO80631
Prepared by:
bha
design
4803 Innovation Dr.
Ft.Collins, CO 80525
January 14,2000
EXHIBIT
2
Weed Management Plan
Site Location
Meadow Vale Phase II PUD is approximately 44 acres in size and is located west of the St.Vrain Creek
and north of State Highway 119.
Objective
The objective of the Weed Management Plan is to control undesirable plants on the property. Plants
identified as undesirable and designated for management on the property include: Russian Knapweed,
Diffuse Knapweed, Canada Thistle,and Musk Thistle.
Methods of Control
The methods of control of undesirable weed species include cultural,mechanical,biological, and chemical
means. The methods are defined as follows:
Cultural—The method or management practices that encourage the growth of desirable plants over
undesirable plants.
Mechanical—The method or management practices that physically disrupt plant growth. These methods
include,but are not limited to, tilling,mowing,burning, flooding,mulching,hand-pulling,and hoeing.
Biological—The use of organisms such as sheep, goats, cattle, insects and plant diseases to disrupt the
growth of undesirable plants.
Chemical—The use of herbicides or plant growth regulators to disrupt the growth of undesirable plants.
Management practices vary depending upon the site where the undesirable plant is located. Management
options are outlined below for each species observed on the site. An integration of one or more of these
methods may be applied.
INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Russian Knan veed
Management options for Russian Knapweed in upland non-crop, areas are suggested as follows.
• Mechanical and Chemical Control—One mowing cycle can be carried out at the bud to early flower
stage, followed by an application of herbicide. Depending upon the herbicide selected,mowing and
herbicide application can be made during the bud stage,bloom to post-bloom stage, or in the fall.
• Cultural and Chemical Control—Application of a short residual herbicide can be made during the bud
stage in early summer. Seeding with a competitive,perennial grass such as Smooth Brome, Ephraim
Crested Wheatgrass, Intermediate Wheatgrass, Sherman Big Bluegrass, or Bozoisky Russian Wild Rye
can follow herbicide application. Fertilization and irrigation could be instituted to stimulate increased
grass growth.
Diffuse Knapweed
Management options for Diffuse Knapweed in upland,non-crop areas are suggested as follows.
• Mechanical and Chemical Control—One mowing operation can be carried out during the bud stage
and again at the flowering stage. If necessary,an herbicide application can be made to plants that have
bolted.
• Cultural and Chemical Control—An herbicide application can be made in the early summer during the
rosette stage through the bolting stage. Later in the summer,reseed with a competitive perennial grass
such as Smooth Brome or Crested Wheatgrass.
• Mechanical Control Only—Mowing can be carried out throughout the season to reduce seed set.
Canada Thistle
Management options for Canada Thistle in wetland and riparian areas are suggested as follows.
• Mechanical and Chemical Control—Mowing can occur throughout the season. Mowing should
terminate during late August followed by an herbicide treatment during September and October before
a hard frost. Canada Thistle on slopes greater than 3:1 should be removed by hand rather than mown.
♦ Cultural and Chemical Control—Application of a short residual herbicide can be done, followed by
seeding with a competitive grass such as Smooth Brome or other sod-forming species. Fertilization
and irrigation could be instituted to stimulate increased grass growth.
• Chemical Control Only—Herbicide can be applied during the rosette to bud stage of Canada Thistle,
and/or in the fall, depending upon the herbicide selected.
Musk Thistle
Management options for Musk Thistle in upland, non-crop areas are suggested as follows.
• Mechanical and Chemical Control—One mowing operation can be carried out during the bud stage.
An herbicide application can be made in the fall to rosettes and any bolted plants
♦ Mechanical Control Only—Sever roots below ground every time plant reaches the early flower stage
to reduce seed production. Mowing can occur during the mid to late flower stage, followed by
gathering and buming the thistle to destroy any seed that has developed.
2 MEMORANDUM
O z To : Floyd Oliver
c Bruce Hendee, BHA Design
e Teresa Jones , Colorado Department of Transportation
O M
Weld County Engineering Department
Weld County Planning Department
From: Matt Delich
9 Date : March 13 , 1995
•
Subject: Meadow Vale Farm PUD traffic study
(File : 9523MEM1 )
z
This memorandum documents the traffic analyses related
to providing access to the Meadow Vale Farm PUD site from
SH119 . The access would be via Weld County Road 5 . 5 (WCR5 . 5) .
Meadow Vale Farm PUD is a single family detached residential
development consisting of 106 dwelling units . An elementary
school site has also been designated within Meadow Vale Farm.
However, the school will not likely be developed for a number
of years ( 10 years or more) . Figure 1 shows the site location
of Meadow Vale Farm PUD .
SH119 is a state administered highway from I-25 west to
Boulder and Gilpin Counties . This segment connects I-25 and
Longmont . It is a four lane highway that is posted at 55 mph .
There are commercial , residential , and agricultural uses along
this segment of SH119 . The most recent CDOT CORIS Report
indicates that the average daily traffic (ADT) in this area
of SH119 is 13 , 000 . The design hourly volume (DHV) is 11
percent of the ADT. The twenty year factor is 2 . 4, indicating
an annual growth rate of 4 . 4 percent . This traffic growth
rate seems high . It is recommended that long range traffic
forecasts for this segment of SH119 be confirmed through a
1.9 _' more rigorous transportation planning process .
a >
WCR5 . 5 intersects with SH119 at a skewed angle . Ideally,
x the intersection should be at a right angle for at least 40
o c� a feet (CDOT comment , letter 11/9/94) . There are no designated
-J turn lanes at this intersection. There is a wide shoulder
w cc
o a ( 10 ' +) on the north side of SH119 that is used as an auxiliary
lane for westbound right turns . There is a median break
• a between the eastbound and westbound lanes of SH119 that can
accommodate an eastbound left-turning vehicle . This median
break also allows southbound vehicles to make a left turn in
w a two step maneuver .
x
E~- In addition to the above information, pe
ak hour traffic
cc counts were obtained at the SH119/WCR5 . 5 intersection in
February 1995 . Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A.
EXHIBIT
These counts are shown in Figure 2 . The DHV, as calculated from
the peak hour counts , is less than that calculated from the CORIS
Report information. Since the peak hour counts reflect more recent
data near the site, they were used for subsequent analyses in this
memorandum.
Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the level of
service at the SH119/WCR5 . 5 intersection is shown in Table 1 .
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The SH119/WCR5 . 5
intersection was analyzed using the unsignalized analysis technique
as published in the "Highway Capacity Manual , " Special Report 209,
TRB, 1985 . Recent research indicates that the unsignalized
analysis technique overstates the level of service at intersections
on four lane major streets . This technique is being revised by
TRB . Following review of the available research and conversations
with the Chairman of the TRB Committee on Highway Capacity and
Quality of Service, this technique was modified to take into
consideration the overstatement of level of service . The
modification entailed multiplying the through traffic by 1 . 2 and
then dividing it in half . This allows for unequal distribution in
the two travel lanes . This intersection operates acceptably .
Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better .
Using the DHV' s shown in Figure 2 , no auxiliary lanes are required
based upon existing traffic volumes .
Meadow Vale Farm is a proposed residential development with
106 dwelling unit sites and a school site . Trip Generation, 5th
Edition, ITE was used to estimate the traffic generated by this
use . Land use code 210 was used for the residential portion of the
site . Occupied dwelling units was used as the independent
variable . Land use code 520 was used for the school site . It was
assumed that the elementary school would have 400 students . Table
2 shows the daily and peak hour trip generation.
Two future years were analyzed with regard to this access .
The short range analysis scenario consisted of existing traffic ,
factored to reflect a year 2000 condition, plus site generated
traffic . It was assumed that half of the site would be built by
the year 2000, but the school site would not be built . A long
range ( 2015) analysis was performed, which assumed full development
of the Meadow Vale Farm site plus background traffic . Trip
distribution used in the traffic assignment process was 50% to/from
the east and 50% to/from the west .
The skewed alignment of WCR5 . 5 should be improved to intersect
at a right angle to SH119 . This should be done when auxiliary
lanes are warranted at the intersection. A sensitivity analysis
was conducted to determine the number of dwelling units that could
be built and occupied prior to requiring auxiliary lanes . It was
determined that 10 dwelling units could be built before a right-
turn deceleration lane would be required . It is recommended that
with the granting of the eleventh building permit, the alignment
of WCR5 . 5 should be changed to intersect SH119 at a right angle .
With the realignment of WCR5 . 5 , right- and left-turn lanes should
be constructed on the WCR5 . 5 approach . When the alignment change
is made , the right-turn deceleration lane will also be warranted .
While the left-turn deceleration/storage lane will not be warranted
until eastbound left-turn DHV reaches 12 vehicles , it is
recommended that this left-turn lane be constructed at the same
time WCR5 . 5 is realigned . Auxiliary lane dimensions are provided
later in this memorandum.
Figure 3 shows the short range peak hour and DHV traffic
expected at the SH119/WCR5 . 5 intersection. The DHV traffic
was
calculated by averaging the o procedure is in accordance
g and afternoon si
generated
with Section
peak hour traffic . This P Access Code (SHAC) . With stop sign
cont , the State Highway eratancuol, the intersection will e operate as indicated in Table 3 .
C . The operation is
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix
acceptable . With the Figure 3 design hourly volumes , a right-turn
auxiliary deceleration and a left-turn auxiliary A westbound accelerationelanerisl
storage not
lane are required . lonpluslaea aperhofw270b rigestound ht-turn
left-turn lane lshould 5bef500 feet
long (deceleration and storage) plus a taper of 270 feet .
Figure 4 shows the long range peak hour and DHV traffic
expected at the SH119/WCR5 . 5 intersection. With the increase in
traffic , a westbound right-turn acceleration
lane
is0 feerequired.
This lane should be 960 feet long plus
o taper
e
volumes shown in Figure 4 are intersections ,
roundednearest five
vehicles .
With stop sign control at the key
be
acceptable, except for southbound left turns . This
is indicated
in Table 4 . Calculation forms are provided in Appendix the
street left. turns will operate
fort minor level
street service
left turnsing during
peak hours . This is typical
peak hours on busy roads . During 20+ hours a day , the opeuaei4n
would likely be acceptable . Using the volumes shown in Fig
a traffic signal would not be warranted . However, if other
unanticipated development occurs to the north of Meadow Vale Farm,
signals may be warranted . Traffic should be monitored periodically
to determine if signal warrants are met . This intersection
location will meet the signal spacing requirements of the SHAC .
It is concluded that development
ens Meadow
whV a Bevel pmeis
feasible from a traffic engineering perspective .
Pe tiMe
nt
will generate approximately 1450 trip ends on an average weekday.
Up to ten dwelling units can be constructed prior to meeting the
right-turn deceleration lane warrant . When this warrant is
sgle . The left,
WCR5 . 5 should be realigned to SH119 at a rig
turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the time WCR5 . 5 is
realigned . Operation at the key intersections will be acceptable
in the short range future . In the long range future , minor street
left turns will experience p acceleration hour delays ,
lanenorma illl be
at
future .
busy intersections • right-turn
required in the longrange
iic-
c° h' N
AM / PM (DHV) �e<>/ CO
STATE HIGHWAY 119
,/ 1 -�-538/5550(3.5)(544)
(2.5) 3/2-/
(562)501/623
1995 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND Figure 2
DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES
I AiS
N
O° b.
AM / PM (DHV) ,\' ot-
*
-----r-
c., —
,c:,
co r
Lc) I \-. 9/22 (16)
STATE HIGHWAY 119 / ---- 667/682 675
(14) 9/19 --1
(697) 621/773
SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND Figure 3
DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES
GOJ�b. N
AM / PM (DHV) ��OOQO
Rounded to the Nearest c-73-"E
* Q.
5 Vehicles. -0- ,$)
c 0
��
a in
\- 40/50 (45)
STATE HIGHWAY 119 ," ---1280 1300 1290
(45)40/45
(1335) 119O/148O--
LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND Figure 4
DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES
Table 1
Existing Peak Hour Operation
Level of Service
Intersection
AM PM
SH119/WCR5 . 5 (stop sign) C C
SB LT/RT A C
EB LT
Table 2
Trip Generation
Daily A .M. Peak P .M . Peak
Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips
in out in out
Meadow Vale Farm - 106 DU 1010 20 58 70 37
Elementary School - 400
440 72 48 8 16
students
Table 3
Short Range Peak Hour Operation
Level of Service
AM PM
Intersection
SH119/WCR5 . 5 (stop sign) D D
SB LT A A
SB RT A A
EB LT
Table 4
Long Range Peak Hour Operation
Level of Service
AM PM
Intersection
SH119/WCR5 . 5 (stop sign) F E
SB LT A A
SB RT A A
EB LT
APPENDIX A
MATTHEW J: DELICH , P.E.
• 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE •
L0VELAND, CO 80538
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
:-..,e,, 1'1"Af? (7 Date 5108 Day G.)cr..a* }A? Clty OJSL 'J Coot) ? V R = Riga;tom
IN-RSEO^ON OF l— e J e1/4—: AND S (-L ( ( 9 Stralgat
S =
Cis % S (4- ( T 7, S .cc r ( y ';
TIM= i rAL from NORTH from SOUTH Norm f f W ; I TOTAL ' "°'L from =AS from
BEGINS East AL
R $ I L I Total II R I S L I Total South I R I S L I Total I R I S I L I Total III wex
173o II 1 lo I 31 I N 3 I I 12181 12z9 !1 ir61 7 1 17 311 39ZIi• 29s
74,c !Is I 10I SI I II 5 I2 12331 IZ?c1 1 / 31I51 / z/..011371 II 37Co
`Coo II Z I ILET I 7 I. I 7 15- 11 -21 ! 14711 li52I 7 I / 9 3O ( 11 3 / 3 !
I •%-•; s- 11 3 1 13 1 (p I I I II (, 13 1 ) 37' :. d-Q it 11 34- I 5-11 3 ;+ 1 a711 7 ?s
II I I I I I I I I I I
73-?'OII13 I I ? I Z II I I II 2 / j( 23O1 174- 1I 13-05I3-4- Coo711 34-8113h9
II I I I I I I I I I .
II I I I I I I I I I I I
II I I I II I I I I I I
II I -I I I I I I I 1 I I I )
II I I I I I I I I i I I I
II I I I I I I I I I I I
II I I I I I I I I I I I
43011 4 1 4 I S I II S I 1 1 1521 I 16- 31 182 3 1 / 5- 1 3 3 '6 I 34 (O
445 II Z I I o l Z. I I II 2 15- 11931 / 9 '6' I /71 312O0134$ 14-00
sd0 116, 1 I ( 1 7 I I II 7 1 0 IIE51 IHSI 201 4 I zoSI 39O 1 39 7
515" IIZ1 131 s I I II S I s 11x71 I ) 9ZI 178 511231 3751 32'O
II I I I 1 I I I I I I
¢3o-5=3o111a- I I 122 II I I I I ii 11 ) 7 / 7I 72211 176- 11s77311/so ) I /cal
I 11
APPENDIX B
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e = = Page 1
_ -------------- ---------------------- --- ----_ - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ____-------_------------------__'_--------------------- ""__'
University of Florida
512 weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 226
Major Street Direction. . . . EW _ Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1064
Length of Time Analyzed.. . 15 (min) p � Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1064
Analyst mjd I I I O Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98
Date of Analysis 5/lp/98
Other Information am pm short long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 465
Eastbound westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 965
LTALTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 965
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 15 455 430 11 8 14
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 954
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 387
MC's (t) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.98
CV's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98
PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.98
Movement Capacity: (pooh) 380
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95t
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road '5.50 3.30 53 L 9 380 9.7 0.0 B
Left Turn Minor Road '5.50 3.40 5.7
SB R 17 1064 3.4 0.0 A
E3 L 18 965 3.8 0.0 A 0.1
Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation =__________`__........"_____'_`.....`_`_______________________=__=_____
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 230
Major Street Direction SW /^� Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1059
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) / O h Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1059
Analyst mjd '. l l Q C Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99
Date of Analysis /10/98
Other Information am pm short long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Conflicting Flows: (vph) 473
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 955
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 955
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 24 350 438 11 8 13
PEF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 860
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pooh) 427
MC's (&) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (&) Imoedance Factor: 0.97
CV's (&) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97
PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.97
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 414
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-uo Avg. 95%
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road *5.50 3.30 SB 5 9 414 8.9 0.0 B
Left Turn Minor Road '5.50 3.40 5.5
SS R 15 1059 3.4 0.0 A
EB L 28 955 3.9 0.0 A 0.2
Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh
APPENDIX C
i
HOS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
________________________ _ __ - ___ - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation _-___________________________________________ __.___ ====================
University of Florida -
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: IN-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 254
Major Street Direction. . . . EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1030
Length of Time Analyzed.. . 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1030
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96
Date of Analysis 5/10/98
Other Information am pm shor long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
-- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 524
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 897
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 897
____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 15 384 483 15 25 40
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 936
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 394
MC's I%) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.98
CV's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98
PCP's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.9E
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 386
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95%
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road .5.50 3.30 SB L 29 386 10.1 0.1 C
Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 3.40 6.1
SB R 46 1030 3.7 0.0 A
EB L 18 897 4.1 0.0 A 0.2
Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
------_------------------------------------- --____=_ _ - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ------ - --- -------- -- -----
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 250
Major Street Direction. . . . EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1034
Length of Time Analyzed.. . 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1034
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.97
Date of Analysis 5/10/98
Other Information am(pm short long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
- --- -- ---------------------------- ---------- -- - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 531
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 889
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 889
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.94
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 45 501 474 30 20 25
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1089
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 335
MC's (i) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.94
cv's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94
PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.94
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 315
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95&
Maneuver Gap )tg) Time (t£) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road '5.50 3.30 SB L 23 315 12.3 0.1 C
Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 3.40 7.5
SB It 29 1034 3.6 0.0 A
EB L 52 889 4.3 0.1 A 0.4
Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh
APPENDIX D
,
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
__-_ - - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ------------------ - --- - ----
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RC from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 350
Major Street Direction. . . . EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 920
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 920
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.91
Date of Analysis 5/10/98
Other Information am pm short long total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
- - - - - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 733
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 693
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 693
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.92
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 45 531 666 30 40 70
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1323
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 262
MC's (t) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.92
Cv's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.92
PCE's 1_10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Irncding Movements 0.92
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 242
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95%
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road *5.50 3.30 SB 1 46 242 18.3 0.7 C
Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 3.40 9.4
SB R 81 920 4.3 0.2 A
EB L 52 693 5.6 0.1 B 0.4
Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh
i
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation _______________________________>______________________________________
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 344
Major Street Direction EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 927
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 927
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96
Date of Analysis 5/10/98 ��� Major Information am m shot[ lon bk rd total Step 2: LT from Ma or Street WS! EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
--------- ----------------- ___ - _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 725
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 700
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 700
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.91
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 55 693 654 35 30 35
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1494
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 219
MC's (t) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.91
CV's (}) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91
P='s 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.91
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 199
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95:
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veb) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road '5.50 3.30 SB L 35 199 21.9 0.6 D
Left Turn Minor Road •5.50 3.40 12.3
SB R 41 927 4.1 0.0 A
EB L 64 700 5.7 0.2 B 0.4
Intersection Delay = 0.7 sec/veh
APPENDIX E
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.le Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: FT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 254
Major Street Direction.. . . EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1030
Length of Time Analyzed. . . 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1030
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.92
Date of Analysis 5/10/9:
Other Information am pm hor long bkgrd total from 2: LT Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
___________ _____________________________ _________.=__a_____ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 529
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pooh) 891
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 891
____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SH
Volumes 30 384 483 20 45 75
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 954
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pooh) 387
MC's (%) Major LT, Minor TB
SU/RV's (%) Impedance Factor: 0.96
CV's (%) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96
PCE's 1.10 1.10 _.10 Capacity A=_nstmer.: Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.96
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 372
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95t
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Pate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road `5.50 3.30 SB L 52 372 11.2 0.5 C
Left Turn Minor Road '5.50 3.40 SB R E' 1030 3.8 0.2 A
E2 L 35 891 4.2 0.0 A 0.3
Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
________________---____---__----_______________________------ ---- - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation =___________________=__________________________________________________
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SE
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 250
Major Street Direction EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1034
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1034
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.95
Date of Analysis 5/10/9'
Other Information am( 'lshort long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Inter..ec".
___________ ___=_ _______________________ _____________________- ____ _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 557
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 061
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 861
____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.89
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N ' Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 85 501 474 55 35 45
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: '(vph) 1144
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 317
MC'S (%) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (e) Impedance Factor: 0.89
CV's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89
PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.89
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 281
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95%
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road •5.50 3.30 SB L 41 281 15.0 0.5 C
Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 3.40 8.6
SB R 52 1034 3.7 0.0 A
EB L 98 861 4.7 0.4 A 0.7
' Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh
APPENDIX F
.
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2,1e Page 1
__ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - RCS: Unsignalized Intersections. Release 2,1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ( .....-------....-------_-----.......-----.-- - - - - ___ .......
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0318 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 350
Major Street Direction. . .. EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 920
Length of Time Analyzed.. . 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 920
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.82
Date of Analysis 5 10/96 on �
Other Information �m short lg bkgrd(total ) Step 2: LT from Major Street WB ED
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection ��
...................._ ______ _____......................................._ _ _ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 748
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 680
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 680
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.88
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 70 531 666 45 BO 140
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1358
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 253
MC's (k) Major LT, Minor TB
SU/RV's (1) Impedance Factor: 0.88
CV's (i) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.88
PCB's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.88
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 223
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
Vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95%
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Race Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (yell) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road *5.50 3.30 SS L 92 223 27.0 1.8 D
Left Turn Minor Road •S.50 3.40 12.9
SD R 162 920 4.7 0.7 A
BB L 81 680 6.0 0.4 B 0.7
• Intersection Delay . 2.1 sec/veh
i
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 1
__________ ___ ___- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1e Page 2
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ........._____________`----`-_`--_______ _ ____ _________`-
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB
__«__s___--_w.......__............__._— ...... _______.___—.......
Streets: (N-S) wcr5.5 (E-W) sh119 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 344
Major Street Direction EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 927
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 927
Analyst mjd Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.90
Date of Analysis 5/10/98
Other Information am®short long bkgrd total Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
—e.___«_.....__.......-_..--__.---=----..----=---===__=.. ..... --__ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 777
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 656
LTRLTRLTRLTR Movement Capacity: (pcph) 656
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.76
No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stop/Yield N N Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB
Volumes 135 693 654 85 55 80
PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1604
Grade 0 0 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 195
MC's (t) Major LT, Minor TH
SU/RV's (t) Impedance Factor: 0.76
CV's (t) Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.76
PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0.76
Movement Capacity: (pcph) 149
Adjustment Factors Intersection Performance Summary
vehicle Critical Follow-up Avg. 95t
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road *5.50 3.30 SB L 64 149 41.2 1.7 E
Left Turn Minor Road *5.50 3.40 19.3
SB R 92 927 4.3 0.3 A
EB L 156 656 7.2 1.0 B 1.2
Intersection Delay = 2.1 sec/veh
Hello