HomeMy WebLinkAbout20002020.tiff PETITION TO STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APFf EALS Fry,Mice Use
Date: 8""1O— 2 0 O O 523 — ( 0' 4Ln 43
Social Security or Tax ID Number of Petitioner Dcc et Number
PETITIONFR. JACOB KAMMEQZELL , N FEE
1.560 W GQ 52'/ Name of Property Owner
4 JoHNSTOWN , CO So 534 .
treat Address,terry,Lip Code of Subject Properly - Check Number
appeals the decision of the W E LD County Board of Equalization P F H
County Name County Board of Commissioners
Property Tax Administrator
D O 0 (check one)
which was dated g — 1 — 2
This appeal concerns: ,^�1� Valuation For tax year(s) 000
Refund/Abatement
Exemption
State Assessed
(Check One) R
CONCERNING_ COUNTY SCHEDULE NUMBER(S): t63 4.1A6
If more than one schedule number is involved,please list on a separate page.
TYPE OF PROPERTY: This property is currently classified by the County as:
Commercial ,C Residential
(Check One) Agricultural Vacant Land
Personal Other(Specify)
ACTUAL VALUE:
Actual value of subject property for year in question as set by the County$ 5 3 (63
I believe the actual value of the subject property should be $ 3 c/-7
REPRESENTATION: Please check appropriate response(s)
Petitioner will be present at the hearing al
Petitioner requests a telephone conference call I-1(Petitioner will call on scheduled date at time of hearing.)
Petitioner will be represented by an agent CI or a Colorado Attorney Q
ESTIMATED TIME FOR PETITIONER TO PRESENT THE APPEAL: 30 Minutes or Hours
Not less than 30 minutes. Board will allow equal time:o Respondent.
ATTACHMENTS: The following documents MUST BE ATTACHED to your appeal in order for the Board to accept filing.
1) The decision being appealed 2) Assessor's Notice of Denial OR Notice of Valuation
:3) If an agent is filing or representing you a notarized letter of authorization will be needed from the Petitioner
4) Identify the names and last known addresses and telephone numbers of other parties"directly interested" in the petition
including co-owners.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING ❑ copy to each person identified it
attachment 4 above
I certify to the Board of Assessment Appeals that I have mailed or hand delivered E County Board of Equal¢ation
one complete copy of this appeal to the WELD County Board of Commissioners
County Property Tax Administrator
in G Re 6 LE y —, Colorado on f6— ! 7 C f?G () (check one-should be the same as the
City Date decision being appealed
K1-444/Y11-ett3dc
(Circle One) Agent or Attorney Petitioners Signature
2-50el D \WOW 15
Mailing Address Mailing Address
Jo +4JGFoluM, Go g0534-
City.State.Zip City,State,Zip
Telephone: _ Telephone: 1 70 -5g7 - 28 £'I
gAt-rmsv 99 Daytime number,please r 4r
acterldit
•en no
cc -• AS CIA 2000-2020
Jacob Kammerzell Aug. 17, 2000
25090 WCR 15
Johnstown, Co 80534
Board of Assessment Appeals
1313 Sherman St. Room 315
Denver, Co. :80203
Reference: Schedule RI634186 Tax Resolution by Weld County Board of Equalization dated on
August 1, 2000.
Gentlemen:
I wish to appeal the Weld County Board of Equalization tax resolution, account No
R1634186 for the following reasons:
1. Prior to the meeting with the Weld County Board of Equalization I was denied access
to the Assessor's comparable market evaluations. Only moments prior to the meeting was I
handed the market evaluations that were prepared by the county appraiser for use in this case..
My request for all of the Assessor's data produced only a copy of"Weld County Assessor
Property Profile" At the Board of Equalization meeting on Aug. 1, 2000, when I pointed out thin
document was flawed in it's approach to property value, I was informed by Commissioner Mi.
Vaad, that this document as provided by the assessor's office was unacceptable. It dealt with
"Cost Approach". Only "Market Approach" could be used for tax appeals of residential
properties. If this was the case why was I mailed this Property Profile if it wasn't to be
acceptable at the board meeting?. I would like to point out that the assessor was in violation of
CRS 39-8-107(3) " The Assessor, upon request, shall make available to the tax payer two days
prior to the hearing all data supporting the Assessor's evaluation".
2. Residencies comparables as provided by the Assessor's Appraisers are not realistic
comparables. Property No. I has log siding. It is located 20 miles away on a paved road and
only ' mile from US Highway 85. This property also includes about 2 acres of land with the
house. Isn't "location, location, location" a factor in real estate values?
Properties 2 and 3 are located in the city of Johnstown. These dwellings include the lot
with all the city amenities that go with city property and are located on paved streets. How can
anyone consider these as comparables with an old country 1909 farm house situated on a dusty
county road?
3. I pointed out to the Board of Equalization that I have documents that one can purchase
a factory built house, delivered on site, 3 Br, 2Ba, 2000 sq. ft., for approximately the same price
as the amount used in the evaluation of the old farm house. Mr. Vaad, County Commissioner.
responded with a statement that factory built homes could not be used for evaluation. No reason
was given for this. I was denied this approach.
Later, I found out that factory built houses, if constructed according to Cola Uniform
Building Code are as reliable as "Stick"built houses. I feel that Mr. Vaad was in error in denying
me the use of factory built houses a comparable.
The use of comparables for the evaluation of rural residencies is an impossible task.
'There are no two rural houses alike to draw conclusions on value. Rural residency appraisal
values have to be tempered with realism and common sense. Unrelated property values cannot
be substituted for another rural property. There are no two alike rural houses.
1 realize that property values have doubled in the last few years. I am willing to settle the
disputed appraised value of this old farm house to a two fold increase in value over last year or
from $17371 to $34742..
Sincerely Yours,
�t lti j`.,11 ,is „ Ac„j1elt
Jacob Kamrnerzell
Hello