HomeMy WebLinkAbout20000810.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: APPROVE 2000-2001 COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION AND
PLAN AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to
Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of
administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with a 2000-2001 Community Services
Block Grant Application and Plan from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through
the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Human
Services, to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, with terms and conditions being as
stated in said application, and
WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, Colorado, that the 2000-2001 Community Services Block Grant Application and
Plan from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County
Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Human Services, to the
Colorado Department of Local Affairs be, and hereby is, approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized
to sign said application and plan.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted
by the following vote on the 10th day of April, A.D., 2000.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WF D COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: 474/
__}
► /'`�'� ��& Barbara J. Kirkmeyer, Chair
Weld County Clerk to the o-
1861 �.. .v►ti EXCUSED
, ;�c ? — M. J. G ile, Pro-Tem
BY: !Z 4 ..
Deputy Clerk to the k:tf� ` P
U� l� orge'E. Baxter 4,4
, APPROVED ASO FORM:
� . Dale
�Cotlnty At�orneY �I/„(�tz--
ga,,R
Glenn Vaad
2000-0810
U N e HR0071
rafttii MEMORANDUM
Barbara J. Kirkmeyer
WI TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 6, 2000
O FROM: Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Services 6lejCi
C.
COLORADO SUBJECT: Community Services Block Grant for PY 2000
Enclosed for Board approval is the Community Services Block Grant for Program Year 2000 to the
Colorado Department of Local Affairs from the Weld County Division of Human Services.
The total of the request is for $207,737.
The focus of the grant is linkage of services and access to transportation for the in-need rural elderly
of Weld County.
The funding will allow for staff time to set up, coordinate, and train the Senior Aide volunteer pools
at rural Senior sites. The grant also funds the operating costs of Senior Minibus Transportation for
the rural elderly from the rural senior sites. It also subcontracts Weldco's Senior volunteer pool to
transport seniors in volunteer vehicles for one-time needs that Minibus cannot address, and
reimburses the volunteer at$.305/Wile.
The term of this request will be May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2000.
If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3800, extension 3317.
2000-0810
H2007I
2000-01 CSBG APPLICATION and PLAN
GRANTEE: Weld County Division of Human Services
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1805 Greeley, Colorado 80632
CONTACT PERSON: Walter J. Speckman
TITLE: Executive Director PHONE: (970) 353-3800
E-MAIL: FAX: (970) 356-3975
COUNTIES INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN: Weld
TOTAL CSBG ALLOCATION $ 207,737
PROGRAM PERIOD: May 1, 2000 To April 30, 2001
At any time,feel free to attach additional pages if more space is needed.
I. FEDERAL OBJECTIVE Total Total Total
Direct Program Administrative CSBG Funds
Costs Costs
See Page 2 for definition as set See Page 2 for definition as set
by U.S.Dept of Health&Human by U.S.Dept of Health&
Services Human Services
1. Employment $ 24,507.00 $ $ 24,507.00
2. Education $ $ $
3. Income Management $ $ $
4. Housing $ $ $
5. Emergency Services $ $ $
6. Nutrition $ $ $
7. Linkages with Other Programs $ 183,230.00 $ $ 183,230.00
8. Self-Sufficiency $ $ $
9. Health $ $ $
10.Other(define): $ $ $
TOTAL $ 207,737.00 $ $ 207,737.00
ac The "Other" category should only be used for services that are not covered under
Federal Objectives 1-9. It should not be used to reflect administrative/indirect costs.
0700 -MO
I. FEDERAL OBJECTIVES: Check the Federal Objective(s)your agency activity(ies) will
be addressing. For each activity,LIST ONLY ONE Federal
Objective.
II. BUDGET FORMAT: Complete your budget in as much detail as possible
utilizing the following format. This information will be
used for monitoring and performance evaluation.
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Indicate the CSBG dollar amount allocated to each position(s) funded including fringe
benefits.
Indicate the percentage (%) of the person's time paid with CSBG funds.
B. DIRECT OPERATING COSTS
Direct program costs can be identified with delivery of a particular project, service, or
activity undertaken to achieve an objective of the grant program. For CSBG,these purposes
and eligible activities are specified in the reauthorizing statute and reflected in the national
ROMA performance measures. Direct program costs are incurred for the service delivery
and management components within a particular program or project. Therefore,direct costs
include expenditures on some activities with administrative qualities,including salaries and
benefits of program staff and managers, equipment, training, conferences, travel, and
contracts, as long as those expenses relate specifically to a particular program or activitiy,
not to the general administration of the organization.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS also referred to as INDIRECT/OVERHEAD
Administrative costs are equivalent to typical indirect costs or overhead, As distinguished
from administration or management expenditures that qualify as direct costs,administrative
costs refer to central executive functions that do not directly support a specific project or
service. Incurred for common objectives that benefit multiple programs administered by the
grantee organization, or the organization as a whole, administrative costs are not readily
assignable to a particular program funding stream. Rather, administrative costs relate to the
general management of the grantee organization, such as strategic direction, Board
development,executive director functions, accounting,budgeting,personnel,procurement,
and legal services.
D. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Please itemize the equipment you intend to purchase.For any Capitol Equipment costs, you
are required to submit a narrative to describe equipment needed and your procurement process.
The State requires that bids and final equipment invoices be submitted to the State.
E. SUBCONTRACT COSTS
Those dollars allocated out to subcontractors to provide CSBG related services.
F. TOTAL CSBG FUNDS BUDGETED
2
II. BUDGET
Cost Category Employment Education Income Housing Emergency Nutrition Linkages Self- Health Other:(define) TOTAL
Management Services Sufficiency
A. Personnel 10,648.00 35,438.00 $ 46,086.00
% of time paid
with CSBG *% % % % % % *% % % %
B. Direct 13,859.00 111,632.00 $ 125,491.00
Operating
C. Indirect / 31.160.00 $ 31,160.00
Overhead
(adN10istranhe)
D. Capital $
Equipment
E. 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
Subcontract
F. TOTAL 24,507.00 183,230.00 $ 207,737.00
erw List all agencies you plan to subcontract with to provide CSBG services: (Please add additional sheets if necessary)
* See Narrative
3
II. BUDGET NARRATIVE
Cost Category Explain each CSBG cost as related to the proposed CSBG plan. Please add additional sheets if necessary
A. Personnel Employment Personnel: $ 10,648.00
Client Services Technicians at .15 FTE, $4,901.00
Employment Services Administration Assistant at.02 FTE,$824.00
Client/Data Systems Coordinator at.06 FTE, $2,898.00
Voc Rehab Technician at.45FTE, $2,024.00
These CSBG funds will pay staff members time for company registration, counseling and demographic tracking of the
applicants. The tracking system will match possible jobs that the applicant may qualify for. These low-income clients
may then follow guided procedures to hopefully receive the job match and become more self-sufficient.
Linkages Personnel: $35,438.00
Community Services Director at.50FTE,$21,202.00
Community Services Technician at .40FTE, $ 14,236.00
These CSBG funds will pay for staff members time for training of Volunteers of all the available programs. This helps
Volunteers and Coordinators provide accurate referrals and outreach to rural low-income seniors. The Director and
Technician help the Volunteers and Coordinators set up senior sites, coordinate programs and monitor and support.
This helps rural low-income seniors maintain their independency.
B. Direct Operating Transportation: $ 104,337.00
Pays for general operating costs of providing rural senior minibus services. This program increases the availability of
transportation to our rural low-income seniors for essential services that would be otherwise be missed due to no
transportation. This in turn improves the life conditions of the low-income rural elderly.
Volunteer Support: $7,295.00
Senior Volunteer mileage-Pays for mileage incurred for Coordinators for service to senior sites, $5,000.00
Volunteer Insurance-Pays for the under 60 volunteers car insurance, $ 145.00 (See Weldcos subcontract)
Volunteer Recognition Banquet-Pays DHS portion of countywide senior volunteer banquet,$1,150.00
General operating costs for volunteer support and employee staff, $ 1,000.00
The senior sites provide nutritional meals to seniors which helps them maintain an independent living situation.These
low-income rural seniors can also communicate with coordinators who have access to many different services that will
help continue their independent living environment and transportation needs.
Employment Services: $ 13,859.00
Employment First Food Stamp Job Search Program- Pays for client supplies and services not allowed by for EF grant,
i.e. eyeglasses or repairs,physicals,uniforms or special clothing to start job,immunizations needed for job,Drivers
License or State ID,Background checks,transportation vouchers, hygiene kits and job search supplies, $9,975.00.
General operating costs for employees, $3,884.00. (See Personnel)
Employment services helps the low-income unskilled adult labor force obtain employment.The new Food Stamp Job
Search Program helps the low-income clients become more self-sufficient by giving them more skills to upgrade their
jobs and financial status and make them more self-sufficient.
C. Indirect/ Overhead Administration: $31,160.00
Administration Staff Personnel Costs $23,370.00
Administration Operating Costs $7,790.00
Pays for administrative time to administer,budget,track and report on grant.
D. Capital Equipment Describe equipment needed and your procurement process. The State requires that bids and equipment final invoices are submitted to the
State.
E. Subcontract WELDCO'S Contract- $ 5,000.00.
Pays WELDCO'S for Volunteer Mileage.This service is the carry-back to the minibus service, coordinated
through the senior sites. Volunteers use their own vehicles to provide transportation services to rural low-
income seniors to doctor appointments, grocery store, meal sites, and other needed services, that are not meet
by the minibus service.These Volunteers are only reimbursed their mileage expenditures.The insurance of
$145.00 is to cover the volunteers that are under the age of 60 and are providing services with their own
vehicles. This increases the availability of transportation for the rural low-income seniors and improves their
life style.
4
III. COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN:
As required in the reauthorized CSBG Act, please answer all 5 questions.
Answer each one on a separate page.
1. Community Needs Assessment (including food needs): Our State office must secure from
each CSBG eligible entity, as a condition to receipt of funding, a community action plan that incl
a community-needs assessment for the community served. This community-needs assessment ma
coordinated with community-needs assessments conducted for other programs.
2. Service Delivery System: Please describe the service delivery system for services provided or
coordinated with CSBG funds that target low-income individuals and families within your service
area.
3. Linkages:
A. Describe how linkages will be developed to fill identified gaps in services, through the
provision of information, referrals, case management, and follow up consultations.
B. Describe how linkages will be established between government and other social service
programs to assure effective delivery of service to low-income individuals and to avoid
duplication of such services.
4. Coordination with other Public and Private Resources: Please describe how CSBG funds
will be coordinated with other public and private resources.
5. Innovative Community and Neighborhood-based Initiatives: Please describe how CSBG
funds will be used to support innovative community and neighborhood-based initiatives related to
purposes of CSBG, which may include fatherhood initiatives and other initiatives with the goal of
strengthening families and encouraging effective parenting.
5
Community Action Plan
1. Community Needs Assessment (including food needs):
For the Program year(May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001), Weld County is using the
Weld County Area Agency on Aging Needs Assessments of Weld County Older Adults
and The Greeley/Weld Economic Development Action Partnership, Inc. In addition, we
have evaluated historical population trends for the County's seniors, using Census
information and estimates from the Colorado Division of Local Government. Together,
these sources have shown a continuing need for transportation services, especially for
rural seniors and the developmentally disabled. See Attachments A, B, C, E, and F.
Current needs assessment for the employment segment of the CSBG grant request was
derived from surveying Weld County applicants demographics for the 1999-2000 year
ending(03/22/00). The majority of the tracked applicants ( 55.59%) did not have either
a high school diploma or G.E.D. and the majority ethnic group ( 79.89% ) was Hispanic.
This demonstrates Weld County's primary area of unmet employment needs: placing an
unskilled minority adult in the labor force. See attachment G.
11,*‘`'k «
k11 .
Transportation ,,� ;/ i
Forty-five individuals (12.5%) stated that they don't drive. When asked if they currently ;s experienced times when they needed to go somewhere but had to stay home because they had no a ,,,
tj° a ''7'.
`means of transportation, 16 (4.4%) of the respondents replied yes. While only 3.4% of those age �*
60-65 have had to stay home on occasion due to lack of transportation, three times that many `'.ra seniors age 81+have experienced this unmet transportation need. Elders of color are nearly twice 1 ,„
as likely as white elders to have unmet transportation needs (7.3% for elders of color as I ,
.
compared with 3.9% for white seniors). -Being below poverty level makes respondents nearly
four times more likely than respondents above poverty level to encounter situations in which t.,,I,,
they cannot obtain the transportation they need (12.1%vs. 3.3%). '`
AN ail Iii ,-f- 4
MAR-09-1999 1::= P.03'
PREPARED FOR: GREELEY/WELD ECONOMIC DEVEL.
Claritas Inc. 19-AUG-98
Sales (888)231-4237 Support (800)780-4237
' (State; 08, Colorado County: 123, weld County, CO)
(weight: 100.0%)
Race and Hispanic Report
•
Race and Population
. Hispanic Origin 1990 (Census) 1998 Est. 2003 Proj .
Total 131821 100.0% 157873 100.0% 175317 100.0%
• Hispanic 27502 20.9% 37630 23.8% 45058 25.7%
Non-Hispanic 104319 79.1% 120243 76.2% 130259 74.3%
White 101977 77.4% 117167 74.2% 126634 72.2%
Black 509 0.4% 625 0.4% 757 0.4%
Am. Indian/Eskimo/Aleut 593 0.4% 605 0.4% 645 0.4%
• Asian/Pacific Islander. 1063 0.8% 1555 1.0% 1941 1.1%
• Other Race 177 0.1% 291 0.2% 282 0.2%
M.A.R.S. Race and • Population
Hispanic (OMB consistent) 1990 1998 Est. 2003 Proj .
•
Total 131821 100.0% 157873 100.0% 175317 100.0%
• White 129063 97.9% 154058 97.6% 170725 97.4%
Black 617 0.5% 874 0.6% 1064 0.6%
Am. Ind./Eskimo/Aleut 953 0.7% 1111 0.7% 1213 0.7%
Asian/Pacific Is1 1188 0.9% 1830 1.2% 2315 1.3%
I'ma : Hispanic 27486 20.9% 37630 23.8% 45058 25.7%
xx�9�"ISYs�^•--••--�--��--e�� �s---�xsxxa=_sx---�—
Hispanic Origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanic and race
counts are derived from separate census questions, and persons of Hispanic
ethnicity can be of any race. The term "Non-Hispanic" refers to persons who
indicated that they are not of Hispanic ethnicity. The sum of Hispanics, White
(Non-Hispanic) , Slack (Non-Hispanic), American Indian (Non-Hispanic) , Asian
(Non-Hispanic) , and Other (Non-Hispanic) equals "All Persons."
•
"M.A.R.S. Race and Hispanic" refers to race data from the "Modified
Age/Race/Sex" files, in which persons who identified themselves on the census
as "Other race" were reclassified to specified race categories such as White,
Black, American Indian ox Asian. The Census Bureau made these modifications to
brig the 1990 data into conformity with race definitions established for
government use by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) . Although Hispanic
• ethnicity was not subject to direct modification, the M.A.R.S. procedures
resulted in occasional minor changes in the Hispanic count, so occasional but
minor discrepancies with the original Hispanic counts may be observed.
-- a17 aatn- •---- SS=-==_===x--.-=------ --- -- -.���.�
1998 estimates and 2003 projections produced by Claritas Inc.
Copyright 1998 Claritas Inc. • Arlington, VA
•
•
j 41,4_62'414 L
MHF:-E9-1999 1::24 P.04
PREPARED 1OI: GREELEY/WELD ECONOMIC DEVEL.
Claritas Inc. 19-AUG-98
; Sales (888)231-4237 Support (800)780-4237
lM
i
(State: 08, Colorado County: 123, Wald County, CO)
(Weight: 100.0%)
Age Report (Page 1 of 2)
Population
Age 1990 1998 Est. 2003 Proj.
Total 131821 100.0% , 157873 100.0% 175317 100.0%
under 5 10570 8.0% 12074 7.6% 12910 7.4%
• 5 to 9 10994 8.34 12822 8.1% 13500 7.7%
10 to 14 10073 7.6% 12165 7.7% 13569 7.7%
15 to 17 5541 4.2% 6761 4.3% 7608 4.3%
18 to 20 8430 6.4% 8718 5.5% 9669 5.5%
21 to 24 8995 6.8% 9087 5.8% 10166 5.84
25 to 29 10375 7.9% 11119 7.0% 10822 6.2%
30 to 34 11278 8.6% 10974 7.0% 11915 6.8%
: 35 to 39 11078 8.4% 12846 8.1% 12078 6.9%
40 to 44 9045 6.9% 12319 7.8% 13234 7.5%
45 to 49 6964 5.3% 10846 6.9% 13031 7.4%
50 to 54 5581 4.2% 8840 5.6% 11347 6.5%
55 to 59 4895 3.7% 6778 4.3% 9194 5.2%
• 60 to 64 4522 3.4% 5441 3.4% 6926 4.0%
65 to 69 4145 3.1% 4896 3.1% 5440 3.14
70 to 74 3405 2.6% 4103 2.6% 4663 2.7%
75 to 79 2626 2.0% 3351 2.14 3673 2.1%
80 to 84 1833 1.4% 2397 1.54 2729 1.6%
f"- : 85 + 1471 1.1% 2336 1.5% 2843 1.6%
Median 30.4 32.8 1D 34.0 l I `�3;
I0. : f 'r
Population
1990 1998 Est. 2003 Proj .
Age Male Female Male Female Male Female
Total 49.4% 50.6% 49.3% 50.7% 49.2% 50.8%
• under 5 4.1% 3.9% 3.9% 3.8% 3.7% 3.6%
5 to 9 4.3% 4.1% 4.14 4.0% 3.9% 3.8%
• 10 to 14 3.9% 3.7% 4.0% 3.7% 4.0% 3.8%
15 to 17 2.2% 2.0% 2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1%
18 to 20 3.0% 3.4% 2.6% 2.9% 2.6% 2.9%
• 21 to 24 3.4% 3.4% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9%
6 25 to 29 4.0% 3.9% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 3.0%
i 30 to 34 4.2% 4.4% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.3%
• 35 to 39 4.2% 4.2% 4.0% 4.1% 3.4% 3.5%
40 to 44 3.5% 3.4% 3.9% 3.9% 3,7% 3.8%
45 to 49 2.64 2.7% 3.5% 3.4% 3.7% 3.84
50 to 54 2.2% 2.14 2. 8% 2.8% 3.2% 3.2%
55 to 59 1.8% 1.9% 2.1% 2.2% 2.6% 2.7%
60 to 64 1.7% 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0%
65 to 69 1.5% 1.7% 1.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.6%
70 to 74 1.14 1.5% 1.2% 1.4% 1.2% 1.4%
75 to 79 0.8% 1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0.9% 1.24
, 80 to 84 0.5% 0.9% 0.5% • 1.0% 0.6% 1.0%
85 + 0.4% 0.7% 0.5% 1.0% 0.5% 1.1%
,; Median 29.7 31.0 32.0 33.7 33.1 34.9
------ - == =a----- __=-=...oa.r=-=-- =1lCa====
1998 estimates and 2003 projections•produced by Claritas Inc.
Copyright 1998 Claritas Inc. Arlington, VA
ri
88
s
Table 12 - Most Pressing Problem Facing Weld County
%* Sample 0uotes
CatetO 28 6% The growth—I hate it with a purple passion. The
Growth ravage of agricultural lands for home i
development. Uncontrolled: owth. 1
•
Transportation/traffic/roads 11.4% Traffic is getting worse. Roads are in need of
repair. Need bus services such as RTD.
No aoblems/ha.• with WC 10.0% A : eat .lace to live and raise a anvil .
Crime/•an•s/din•s/le•al s stem 9.7% The increase in violent crimes.
5.8% Educatin: our children to the maximum.
Education 5 3% For my money the main fly in the ointment is the
assessor. Asking for more taxes when they have a
surplus. Taxes too hi:h.
3.1% The lack o alordable housin: or seniors.
Housin:Increased 3.1% The expenses o water :oin: us.
ncerns cost of livin:
Concerns for elders 3.1% The elderly population being lost in the shuffle
r; and not :ettin: the help the need
Jobs/Income 2.8% Wages too low for people who lack a good
education. Not enou:h em do ment.
$, 2.8% [Will not include in report]
2.5% I'm worried about water, that it won't be enou:h.
Health care/services/LTC 2.5% Need doctors in small communities [for the] old
people, seniors Nursing home costs are
outra:eous, assisted livin: is ridiculous) hi:h..
Opposed to/problems with welfare 2.2% The people on welfare. People who have it don't
need it, people who need it don't have it.
Pro-growth 1.9% Need more businesses in Greeley for tax
g purposes.
Drunk drivers/accidents/deaths 1.9% There are too man drunks, wrecks.
Lack of services/Spanish outreach 1.9% If these services could be offered in Spanish, it
would be easier to use them. WC has a large
Hi panic population that needs these services.
betwen groups (race, age,
Prejudice/small mindedness/racism 1'7% Racial strife!gender) Greeley sra busy-body small minded
town.
R Values (family, community) 1.7% We need to be more concerned about our
children, what values we : ve them.
Government/politics/leaders/planning 1.4% People lack faith in government because
government sometimes doesn't do what they say
to the public.
Greek C s h lets too much vs. rest of WC 3 1% Phel that sical recreat'ontcenter.t Suicides. Bad smell.
Other 19.7%
No comment
*Many respondents gave more than one answer.
,
86
All Concerns Indicated by 95 Weld County Seniors Reporting One or More Major
Figure 58 cont.
Financial Concerns and Their Biggest Financial Concern(cont.)
•
22% 1% Biggest $ Concern
Gen Bills ' 8.
p Have $ Concern
:„..\\ 1.4% I
Home Rep _ ..
1 8.5% I
03%
Trans 123%
i.l 2.5%
Prescrip .111.4%
� . 4 2%
Health Care .113.3%
Needs of Weld County
finalquestion of the survey was open ended. Respondents were read the following
par growing and
paragraph: "As you probably know, Weld County is currently in the process of
changing. What do you see as the most pressing problem facing Weld County?" The problem
mentioned most often deals with growth, which was cited by 28.6% of respondents (Figure 59,
Table 12). Typical of the comments received was this individual's view: "Unbridled growth
causing living expenses to rise and forcing fixed-income people into poverty." Another
respondent noted, "I hate to see the population increasing and buildings taking over good farm
land." A more recent resident of Weld County stated that the uncontrolled growth of houses is
the more pressing problem: "We moved here from LA to get away from the growth and now it's
coming here."
t The second most common problem cited was that of transportation, traffic, and road maintenance
(11.4%). As one respondent phrased it, she is concerned about"the transportation when I am no
_ longer able to drive." Another stated, "Traffic is getting worse. I really don't see anything
ge
except the traffic going.
�• 10.0% fell, was
based on the
of the respondents
The thatd highest response category,place into which e and that no pressing problems are interfering with
view Weld County is a great to live P
F.
I
/Ile%l .!/LCi i� C�CUS (rtpa-t� 92
/D par-4 ,, pa.r4s
, I
encountering difficulties with the Social Security
I am treated by ! The woman who is enco g
white people with office staff said that the woman who is trying to get bribes to do her job
love, especially my is a Hispanic. One participant was especially eloquent, stating, "I am
doctor: treated by white people with love, especially my doctor."
Legal Issues: None of the participants expressed concerns about legal issues. One gentleman I
said that he actually helps others write letters when they are dealing with legal issues. When
asked about having a will, most participants said they did not have one, but thought it would be a
good idea.
What Would Make Life Better: The final question posed to the focus group was: "Of all the
concerns or problems facing Hispanic seniors today in Greeley, what do you think is the most I
important concern? What do you think will help make this problem better?"
' One of the widowed homeowners said that she would like someone to live with her and keep her
company because she is lonely. She also said that she would like more transportation options
since she doesn't want to have to bother her son all the time.
Four other participants agreed that transportation is a major problem. One I've had to
noted that she has to pay one of her friends to drive her and that she's had to cancel
she had no means of getting there. She appointments,, I
2: cancel doctor appointments because
:. believes improved public transportation would help. Two others agreed that with my doctor',
doctor is a real issue. The participant with the unreliable several times
transportation to the
truck explained that she now also needed to find a doctor since she had because I didn't
missed two appointments when her truck wouldn't start. Now her doctor has have any way to
= informed her that she can no longer be his patient since she has missed the get there. We
show Finally, one need better
. .
appointments and he needs to have paying clients who p. y,
gentleman said that while he himself doesn't have transportation problems, he public
transportation but do not have transportation
knows of many other Hispanic elders who need p
access to it.
One participant said that he feels loneliness is a major problem among Hispanic elders. He
invited everyone to attend a meeting that is held regularly at the Rodarte Center. He suggested
that efforts should be made to get people together by phone or to go on trips to reach out to the -0
:, isolated and lonely seniors.
t Another participant said that he knows of several Hispanic seniors who need counseling to help
by finding out
them with their emotional problem
s. He stated that he would like to help others
P
what their needs are. This gentleman's wife agreed that what is needed is a way to help others.
She thinks a major concern is helping people find appropriate housing so they don't have to live
with family members. Finally, one participant said that he believes everything is okay.
fee /1/I 1 h111fv1+ F
FRQ of ETH 746 03/21/2000 at 11:23 AM (built 03/20/2000-11:10 PM) Pg 1
ETHNIC FREQUENCY, ACTIVE IN 7131 UNDER 12TH GRADE, NOT IN SCHOOL
146 19.57% 1 White, non-hispanic
1 0 .13% 2 Black, non-hispanic
596 79.89% 3 Hispanic
2 0.27% 4 American Indian
1 0.13% 6 Information not available
DDF on 03/21/2000 at 11:23 AM (Built 03/20/2000 at 11:10 PM )
DROPOUT DATA
D# Count Percent Label
1 746 55.59 ACTIVE 7131 EDU <12 - NOT IN SCH
2 596 44.41 ACTIVE HISPANICS EDU <12 NOT IN SCH
Community Action Plan
2. & 4. Service Delivery System and Coordination with other Public and Private
Resources:
Weld County Division of Human Services is a one stop service center for various Federal
and State programs all targeted to low income at-risk individuals. This includes the
children's program area, Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC), which
oversees Head Start, Migrant Head Start, and Preschool. The Area Agency on Aging
umbrellas several senior programs including Older American Act Programs, Single Entry
Point and JTPA. The Employment Service Area has JTPA Adult and Youth programs,
and in June 2000 the WIA Adult and Youth programs, Dislocated Workers, Employment
First, TANF, Job Service, Americorp, Y.C.P.I, and an Educational Computer Lab. All
programs are targeted to low income at-risk individuals. CSBG funding fills the gaps in
integrated services we currently provide.
Community Action Plan
3. Linkages:
A. Because we are a Human Services agency serving a low income in-need population, in
various ways, we have developed many partnerships with other county agencies pursuing
the same goals. With these linkages our Case Managers can refer clients who qualify for
our programs as well as refer them to other agencies. Other agencies can refer their clients
to Human Services as well. With this partnership clients will not have gaps in-between
services. Our Case Managers always do follow up consultations of our clients.
B. We currently work with Social Services, Weld Information & Referral Services (WIRS),
primary and secondary educational systems as well as a host of non-profits in Weld
County aimed at self-sufficiency for the citizens of our area. Since we track all of our
clients we are able to avoid any duplication of services.
Community Action Plan
5. Innovative Community and Neighborhood-based Initiatives:
Since Weld County Division of Human Services is a one stop service center for various
Federal and State programs, this gives initiatives for parents to address all needs. With
CSBG funding, this program's goal can be achieved to strengthen family's with
employment and educational opportunities, which will help parents become self
sufficient. This along with the programs of Social Services can reach it goal of
strengthening families and encourage effective parenting.
VII. CERTIFICATIONS:
The grantee assures that activities implemented with CSBG funds will be:
• used to accomplish the State CSBG Goal and Objective stated in the State Plan;and
• within the requirements set forth in the Community Services Block Grant Act,Title IV of the Civil Rights Act,the Age Discrimination Act
of 1975,the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,Public Law 103-227,Part C,Environmental Tobacco Smoke,also known as the Pro-Children Act
of 1994 (Act), Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements, Certification Regarding Lobbying, Certification Regarding
Debarment,Suspension,and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions,Office of Management and Budget(OMB Circular
A110 and A122),and the current State of Colorado CSBG Plan.
The grantee also assures that it will:
• specifically consider, in a public meeting the designation of any local public or private entity to carry out the county community service
activities under contract with the county,any local community action agency(CAA)which received federal fiscal 1981-82 funding;
• consider, on the same basis as other non-governmental organizations,religious organizations to provide the CSBG services, so long as the
program is implemented in a manner consistent with the Establishment Clause of the first amendment to the Constitution. Grantees shall not
discriminate against an organization that provides assistance under,or applies to provide assistance,on the basis that the organization has a
religious character. (Please review Sec.679 Operational Rule in the CSBG Act);
• provide for coordination between community anti-poverty programs and ensure,where appropriate,that emergency energy crisis intervention
programs under Title XXVI(relating to low-income home energy assistance)are conducted in such community;
• provide, on an emergency basis,for the provision of such supplies and services,nutritious foods,and related services,as may be necessary
to counteract conditions of starvation and malnutrition among low-income individuals;
• coordinate, to the extent possible, programs with and form partnerships with other organizations serving low-income residents of the
community and members of groups served,including religious organizations,charitable groups, and community organizations;
• establish procedures under which a low-income individual,community organization,or religious organization,or representative of low-income
individuals that considers its organization,or low-income individuals,to be inadequately represented on the CSBG board(or other mechanism)
to petition for adequate representation;
• in the case of public organizations, have a tripartite advisory board which shall have members selected by the organization and shall be
composed so as to assure that not fewer than 1/3 of the members are persons chosen in accordance with democratic selection procedures
adequate to assure that these members(a)are representative of low-income individuals and families in the neighborhood served,(b)reside
in the neighborhood,and(c)are able to participate actively in the development,planning,implementation,and evaluation of program funded.
• in the case of private non-profit entities,have a tripartite board that participates in the development,planning,implementation,and evaluation
of the program to serve low-income communities. The board shall be composed so as to assure that(a) 1/3 of the members are elected
officials,holding office on the date of selection,or their representatives,except that if the number of such elected officials reasonably available
and willing to serve on the board is less than 1/3 of the membership of the board,membership on the board of appointive public officials or
their representatives may be counted in meeting such 1/3 requirement;(b)not fewer than 1/3 of the members are person chosen in accordance
with democratic selection procedures adequate to assure that these members are representative of low-income individuals and families in the
neighborhood served, and each representative of low-income individuals and families selected to represent a specific neighborhood within
a community resides in the neighborhood represented;and(c)the remainder of the members are officials or members of business,industry,
labor,religious,law enforcement, education,or other major groups and interest in the community served;
• prohibit the purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase, construction, or permanent improvement(other than low-cost residential
weatherization or other energy-related home repairs)of any building or facility with CSBG funds;
• prohibit, including subcontractors, (a)any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or any political activity associated with a candidate, or
contending faction or group,in an election for public or party office,(b)any activity to provide voters or prospective voters with transportation
to the polls or similar assistance in connection with any such election,or(c)any voter registration activity.
• prohibit that persons shall,on the basis of race,color,national origin or sex,be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or
be subjected to discrimination under,any program or activity funded in whole or in part with CSBG. Any prohibition against discrimination
on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act or 1975(42 U.S.C 6101 et seq.)or with respect to an otherwise qualified individual with
a disability as provided in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 12131 et seq.)shall also apply to any such program or
activity. - 1
• participate in the Results-Oriented Management and Accountability(ROMA) System,and describe outcome measure to be used to
measure performance in promoting self-sufficiency,family stability, and/or community revitalization;
• make available for public inspection each plan prepared as part of the program planning process. The grantee may, at its initiative revise
any plan prepared for CSBG funding and shall fumish the revised plan to the Director of the Community Services Block Grant under the
Department of Local Affairs. Each plan prepared for submission shall be made available for public inspection within the county and/or
service area in such a manner as will facilitate review of, and comments on,the plan;
• cooperate with the State, to determine whether grantee performance goals, administrative standards, financial management requirements,
and other requirements of the State,in conducting monitoring reviews including(1) a full on-site review for each grantee at least once
during each 3-year period, (2) on-site review for each newly designated grantee immediately after the completion of the first year in
which funds were received, (3) follow-up reviews with grantees that fail to meet the goals, standards, and requirement established by the
State, and(4)other reviews as appropriate, including reviews of grantees with other programs that have had other federal, State,or local
grants terminated for cause.
• ction, n, copying, r mechanical orake off them premise es upon reasonable ropriate books,documents,
req request by the U.S Controller Generale the State, r their authorized rrepresentatives shoud ay reproduction on
investigation of the uses of CSBG funds be undertaken;
• in the case of county governments or subgrantees which receive a CSBG award in excess of$100,000,comply with the following three
certifications related to the "Limitation on use of appropriated funds to influence certain Federal Contracting and financial transactions
(P.L. 101-121, Section 319 and CSC Title 31 Section 1352)":
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,or any employee of
a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instruction.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award document for subawards at all tiers
(including subcontracts, subgrants,and contacts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordingly.
The grantee certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief,that it and its principals:
a) are not presently debarred, suspended,proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from covered
transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against them for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a public transaction;
violation of Federal or State antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,bribery, falsification or destruction
of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
c) are not presently indicted for otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State or local' with
commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(b) of this certification; and
d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions(Federal, State or local)
terminated for cause or default.
If vats are unable to certify to
any of the statements in this certification,please attach an explanation to this application.)
CONT]2ACTORI- ( v
f County Grantee: Chai an of the Bo of County Commissioners must sign
If Multi-County Service Agency: Chairman of the Board of Directors with delegated contracting authority must sign.
POSITION TITLE: Barbara J. Kirkmeyer, Chair, Weld County Board DATE: 04/10/2000
of Commissioners
IV. 2000-01 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT:
County: Weld
Implementing Agency: Weld County Human Services
(Each agency/subcontractor receiving CSBG dollars must complete this form).
Implementing Agency Contact Person: Walt Speckman
Address: 1551 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634
Phone Number: ( 970 ) 353-3800 Fax: (970) 356-3975
E-Mail Address:
CSBG Award: $ 207,737
Program Period: 05/01/00 to 04/30/01
month/day/yea month/day/year
Select ONE Federal Objective:
❑ Employment 0 Nutrition
❑ Education 7( Linkages with Other Programs
❑ Income Management 0 Self-Sufficiency
❑ Housing 0 Health
❑ Emergency Services 0 Other: Non-Direct WELDCO'S
Select ONE National Goal:
❑ # 1: Low-income people become more self sufficient.
#2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved.
❑ # 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community.
❑ #4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved.
❑ # 5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results.
❑ #6: Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations,achieve their potential by
strengthening family and other supportive systems.
Select ONE National Direct Measure:
Increase in the availability and afford ability of essential services, e.g. transportation,
medical care, and child care.
Using:he attached CSBG National Goals/Measures,indicate the appropriate Measure corresponding to the above selected Goal.
6
#1 PROBLEM STATEMENT: as related to local poverty issues and community needs assessment.
Public transportation leaves unmet transportation needs for rural Seniors.
#2 CSBG PROGRAM SERVICES/ACTIVITIES: What services/activities did you provide to program
participants with CSBG funds? How many participants did you intend to serve?
To provide one-on-one transportation services to eligible clients through the WELDCOS Program. Our
goal would be to increase the number of clients served from the last year. CSBG funds would pay
Mileage and Insurance for Senior volunteer drivers to use their own vehicles to transport low-income
rural seniors when public or minibus transportation can not meet needs.
#3 LOW-INCOME(125% of poverty level) TARGET POPULATION: Who are your services/activities
directed to?
The low-income rural elderly.
#4 PROPOSED OUTCOMES: How were you hoping program participants will change/improve as
a result of your services/activities?
By giving access to services where there wasn't any before because transportation was Number of people
not available. you are proposing
to serve with CSBG
funds?
#5 ACTUAL OUTCOMES: How did program participants actually change/improve as a result of your
services/activities?
Number of people
you actually served
with CSBG funds?
this question is answered at mid-year and final reporting dates
7
#6 MEASUREMENT and TIME FRAME: How did you measure change among your program
participants? What is the time frame of the services/activities?
Weld County will measure through WELDCOS monthly reports of passenger trips from 05/01/00
through 04/30/01.
#7 PROBLEMS/BARRIERS ENCOUNTERED IN PROVIDING SERVICES/ACTIVITIES:
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#8 PLANNED CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS: How are you planning to address the above stated
problems/barriers? Other improvements or changes?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#9 OTHER RESOURCES USED AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROGRAM SERVICES: What other
resources (volunteers, other funding, in-kind donations, etc.)were utilized? What difference did these
resources make on the services/activities provided?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
8
IV. 2000-01 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT:
County: Weld
Implementing Agency: Weld County Human Services
(Each agency/subcontractor receiving CSBG dollars must complete this form).
Implementing Agency Contact Person: Walt Speckman
Address: 1551 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634
Phone Number: (970 ) 353-3800 Fax: (970) 356-3975
E-Mail Address:
CSBG Award: $ 207,737
Program Period: 05/01/00 to 04/30/01
month/day/year month/day/year
Select ONE Federal Objective:
❑ Employment 0 Nutrition
❑ Education II. Linkages with Other Programs
❑ Income Management 0 Self-Sufficiency
❑ Housing 0 Health
❑ Emergency Services ❑ Other: Non-Direct Minibus
Select ONE National Goal:
❑ /I 1: Low-income people become more self sufficient.
#2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved.
❑ # 3: Low-income people own a stake in their community.
❑ #4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved.
❑ # 5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results.
❑ #6: Low-income people,especially vulnerable populations,achieve their potential by
strengthening family and other supportive systems.
Select ONE National Direct Measure:
Increase in availability and afford ability of essential services, e.g. transportation, medical
care, child care
_ Using the attached CSBG National Goals/Measures,indicate the appropriate Measure corresponding to the above selected Goal.
6
#1 PROBLEM STATEMENT: as related to local poverty issues and community needs assessment.
Unmet transportation needs for rural elderly clients.
#2 CSBG PROGRAM SERVICES/ACTIVITIES: What services/activities did you provide to program
participants with CSBG funds? How many participants did you intend to serve?
Weld County will make Minibus transportation available, coordinated through the senior sites, all over
the rural county. We should see an increase of the number of passenger trips from the last year and the
number of miles will in turn also increase from last year, since we will be increasing our schedules. But in
turn we should increase the number of clients served.
#3 LOW-INCOME(125% of poverty level) TARGET POPULATION: Who are your services/activities
directed to?
The low-income rural elderly.
#4 PROPOSED OUTCOMES: How were you hoping program participants will change/improve as
a result of your services/activities?
By meeting transportation needs, services will be available to people who did not Number of people
you are proposing
have that access before. to serve with CSBG
funds?
#5 ACTUAL OUTCOMES: How did program participants actually change/improve as a result of your
services/activities?
Number of people
you actually served
with CSBG funds?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
7
#6 MEASUREMENT and TIME FRAME: How did you measure change among your program
participants? What is the time frame of the services/activities?
Weld County will measure participants through the number of passenger trips from the Monthly
Transportation Log Summary.
#7 PROBLEMS/BARRIERS ENCOUNTERED IN PROVIDING SERVICES/ACTIVITIES:
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#8 PLANNED CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS: How are you planning to address the above stated
problems/barriers? Other improvements or changes?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#9 OTHER RESOURCES USED AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROGRAM SERVICES: What other
resources (volunteers, other funding, in-kind donations, etc.) were utilized? What difference did these
resources make on the services/activities provided?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
s
IV. 2000-01 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT:
County: Weld
Implementing Agency: Weld County Human Services
(Each agency/subcontractor receiving CSBG dollars must complete this form).
Implementing Agency Contact Person: Walt Speckman
Address: 1551 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634
Phone Number: (970 ) 353-3800 Fax: (970) 356-3975
E-Mail Address:
CSBG Award: $ 207,737
Program Period: 05/01/00 to 04/30/01
month/day/year month/day/year
Select ONE Federal Objective:
❑ Employment 0 Nutrition
❑ Education >l Linkages with Other Programs
❑ Income Management 0 Self-Sufficiency
❑ Housing 0 Health
❑ Emergency Services 0 Other: Volunteer Support
Select ONE National Goal:
❑ # 1: Low-income people become more self sufficient.
❑ #2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved.
❑ #3: Low-income people own a stake in their community.
❑ #4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved.
❑ # 5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results.
IL # 6: Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations,achieve their potential by
/ strengthening family and other supportive systems.
Select ONE National Direct Measure:
Number of aged households maintaining an independent living situation.
6
#1 PROBLEM STATEMENT: as related to local poverty issues and community needs assessment.
Volunteers and Coordinators need support to be better equipped to provide elderly outreach and referral
services.
#2 CSBG PROGRAM SERVICES/ACTIVITIES: What services/activities did you provide to program
participants with CSBG funds? How many participants did you intend to serve?
Weld County will provide monthly training sessions for 323 Senior Volunteers and 22 Senior
Coordinators for the 23 sites around the county. Together the Volunteers and Coordinators will set up the
senior sites, and train volunteers, coordinate programs to provide access to different services, and
continually monitor and support.
#3 LOW-INCOME(125% of poverty level) TARGET POPULATION: Who are your services/activities
directed to?
The low-income rural elderly citizens of Weld County.
#4 PROPOSED OUTCOMES: How were you hoping program participants will change/improve as
a result of your services/activities?
By educating our Volunteers and Coordinators, the participants can be assured that Number of people
you are proposing
more needed services can be more easily accessed by rural seniors and it gives the
to serve with CSBG
mechanism to do it. funds?
#5 ACTUAL OUTCOMES: How did program participants actually change/improve as a result of your
services/activities?
Number of people
you actually served
with CSBG funds?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
7
#6 MEASUREMENT and TIME FRAME: How did you measure change among your program
participants? What is the time frame of the services/activities?
By monthly Time Sheets we can document the number of staff hours per year committed to providing
training to Volunteers and Coordinators for improved access to available services.
#7 PROBLEMS/BARRIERS ENCOUNTERED IN PROVIDING SERVICES/ACTIVITIES:
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#8 PLANNED CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS: How are you planning to address the above stated
problems/barriers? Other improvements or changes?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#9 OTHER RESOURCES USED AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROGRAM SERVICES: What other
resources (volunteers, other funding, in-kind donations, etc.) were utilized? What difference did these
resources make on the services/activities provided?
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
8
IV. 2000-01 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT:
County: Weld
Implementing Agency: Weld County Human Services
(Each agency/subcontractor receiving CSBG dollars must complete this form).
Implementing Agency Contact Person: Walt Speckman
Address: 1551 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634
Phone Number: (970 ) 353-3800 Fax: (970) 356-3975
E-Mail Address:
CSBG Award: $ 207,737
Program Period: 05/01/00 to 04/30/01
month/day/year month/day/year
Select ONE Federal Objective:
Employment 0 Nutrition
' ❑ Education 0 Linkages with Other Programs
❑ Income Management 0 Self-Sufficiency
❑ Housing 0 Health
❑ Emergency Services 0 Other:
Select ONE National Goal:
•
# 1: Low-income people become more self sufficient.
O #2: The conditions in which low-income people live are improved.
O #3: Low-income people own a stake in their community.
O #4: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved.
❑ #5: Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results.
O #6: Low-income people,especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential by
strengthening family and other supportive systems.
Select ONE National Direct Measure:
Number of participants seeking employment who obtain it [as compared with the total
number of participants].
6
#1 PROBLEM STATEMENT: as related to local poverty issues and community needs assessment.
Lack of full time employment among low-income unskilled adult labor force.
#2 CSBG PROGRAM SERVICES/ACTIVITIES: What services/activities did you provide to program
participants with CSBG funds? How many participants did you intend to serve?
Weld County will obtain employment for the low-income unskilled adult labor force. Case management
will do an assessment of skills, provide training, and employment finding activities.
#3 LOW-INCOME (125% of poverty level) TARGET POPULATION: Who are your services/activities
directed to?
All low-income and unskilled adult labor force who request assistance for employment or better
opportunities in the labor force.
#4 PROPOSED OUTCOMES: How were you hoping program participants will change/improve as
a result of your services/activities?
By getting a job that will make participants self-sufficient Number of people
you are proposing
to serve with CSBG
funds?
#5 ACTUAL OUTCOMES: How did program participants actually change/improve as a result of your
services/activities?
Number of people
you actually served
with CSBG funds?
this question is answered at mid-year and final reporting dates
7
#6 MEASUREMENT and TIME FRAME: How did you measure change among your program
participants? What is the time frame of the services/activities?
Weld County will document the number of tracked applicants receiving employment through the Human
Resources Demographics Software.
#7 PROBLEMS/BARRIERS ENCOUNTERED IN PROVIDING SERVICES/ACTIVITIES:
this question is answered at mid year and final reporting dates
#8 PLANNED CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS: How are you planning to address the above stated
problems/barriers? Other improvements or changes?
this question is answered at mid-year and final reporting dates
#9 OTHER RESOURCES USED AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROGRAM SERVICES: What other
resources (volunteers, other funding, in-kind donations, etc.) were utilized? What difference did these
resources make on the services/activities provided?
this question is answered at mid-year and final reporting dates
8
V. CSBG BOARD LIST:
Representatives of Private Sector:
Name: Gladys Bolander (Senior Representative) Name: Patricia Whitcomb (Former/Vacant)
Address: 1000 13th Street Greeley,CO 80631 Address: Handicapped Representative
Phone: 352-6890(H) Phone:
Name: Ruth Gartrell(Former/Vacant) Name:
Address: South County Representative Address:
Phone: Phone:
Representatives of Public Sector:
Name: Cornelia Dietz (United Way Representative) Name: Mary Ellen Faules (Former/Vacant)
Address: 1713 Glen Meadows Drive Greeley,CO 80631 Address: Area on Aging
Phone: 352-8313 (H) 353-5003 (B) Phone:
Name: Glenn Vaad (County Commissioner) Name: Georgia Kanten(former/Vacant)
Address: 915 10`h Street Greeley,CO 80631 Address: Veterans Representative
Phone: 353-3800 ex.4200 Phone:
Low-Income Persons or their Representatives:
Name: Yvonne Benavides (Parent Policy Representative) Name: Christina Garza(Parent Policy Representative)
Address: 136 E.24th Street,#9 Greeley,CO 80631 Address: 714 17 Street Greeley,CO 80631
Phone: 395-0429(H) 352-1551 (B) Phone: 352-4895
Name: Carolyn Burmeister (Parent Policy Representative) Name:
Address: 20061 Southgate Avenue LaSalle,CO 80645 Address:
Phone: 737-2919(H) 303-427-1312(B) Phone:
9
VI. BOARD MINUTES
Please attach a copy of your CSBG Board minutes of the meeting when the
CSBG application was reviewed and approved by your CSBG board.
VII. PROOF OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Please attach a copy of the public notice
(including the listing in the local newspaper for each county served)
calling for public review and comment on your CSBG Application and Plan.
VIII. MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING
Please attach a copy of the minutes of the Public Meeting when the
CSBG Application was reviewed and approved.
I0
Hello