HomeMy WebLinkAbout20000619 �� e}
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of 1100 10TH STREET,GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 (970)350-9780 FAX(970)350-9800,
Greeley
E+ld Cou:lty PLnnicp; + ,,,�
November 15, 1999
NM; 7 3 i9=gig
Kim Ogle 'a If, Pr, re,
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Weld County Case#AmUSR-897
The City of Greeley Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 9,
1999, reviewed the above referenced case. In a vote of 6-0, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the amended use by special review permit with the following eight
conditions:
• 1. The temporary access on 71s`Avenue clearly defined as to the length of use and
exact type of truck traffic.
• 2. All traffic generated from the Special Review Use shall be restricted from
using 71st Avenue in either direction (north or south bound traffic) south of the
site because of the conflicts with adjacent, residential traffic and student traffic
from Northridge High School.
• 3. The reclamation plan shall be redesigned in order that the wildlife habitat
restoration and re-vegetation efforts be planned and monitored by a qualified
wildlife biologist/ecologist.
• 4. The Special Review Permit shall take into consideration the Poudre Trail
Project.
• 5. Clarification on who will be responsible for meeting the augmentation
requirement for the site.
• 6. Noise generated from the site shall meet all City and State requirements.
• 7. A perimeter treatment plan shall be required along O Street, 71st Avenue, and
83r3 Avenue.
L2000-0619
Kim Ogle
November 15, 1999
Page Two
• 8. Re-vegetation of the site should contain native and natural seed mixes as
identified in a letter dated November 4, 1999, from Steven C. Augerot with the
City Parks Department. In addition, noxious weeds are anticipated to be a
problem and should be eradicated using a combination of techniques.
I have included a copy of our staff report. Please note that there was discussion at the hearing
and the conditions approved by the planning commission differ some from the staff report.
The Greeley Planning Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. If you
have any questions, or need additional information please contact me at 350-9784.
Sincerely,
alb ,
Debbie de Besche
Planner II
Weld County Referral for an Amended Special Review
Permit for Gravel Mining and Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant
Condition#9
9. Re-vegetation of the site should contain native and natural seed mixes as identified
in a letter dated November 4, 1999, from Steven C. Augerot with the City Parks and
Recreation Department. In addition, noxious weeds are anticipated to be a problem
and should be eradicated using a combination of techniques.
y r
��
November 4, 1999
TO: Debbie de Besche
FROM:
Steven C. Auger , Parks Program Manager
SUBJECT: Weld County Camas Mining Project
After reviewing the application for amending the Use by Special Review for the Camas
Mining Project, I have the following concerns:
• There is no comment about how the Poudre River Trail corridor will fit into the
finished project.
• If at all possible, it would be nice if the proposed water storage ponds could be
combined into one large lake that then could be used for recreational purposes.
Additionally, if this were possible, or even if they could not be combined, it would
be nice if the design was more aesthetically pleasing.
• Regarding the revegetation of the site, the grass seed mix containing Sideoats
Grama, Switchgrass, Blue Grama, and Wheatgrass would be much preferred
over the second mix. I am including a list of mixes the City is currently using in
various situations as possible alternatives. The following trees and shrubs do
not seem appropriate for this location, Honey Locust, Lilac, and Tartarian
Honeysuckle.
• In paragraph four of Exhibit E, it states that, "Weeds are not expected to pose a
problem in revegetating the site." It is our experience that any time the existing
vegetation is removed and the soil is disturbed, noxious weeds become a
problem. Mowing of weeds may keep them in check, but eradication is much
preferred and this requires a combination of techniques.
Enc.
SERVING OUR COMMUNITY • I T ' R A TRADITION
We promise/0 preserve and improve the Toddy alga for creel-ay grovyt timely, courteous and cad effec/ue.seroice.
CITY OF GREELEY
NATIVE/NATURAL SEED MIXES
Slope Mix
Species pls per acre
Sideoats grama 1.0
Blue grama 1.0
Little Bluestem 1.0
Sand dropseed 0_3
3.3
Low Grow Mix
Species pls per acre
Buffalograss 4.0
Blue grama 3.25
7.25
Open Space Mix
Species pls per acre
Sideoats grama 1.0
Blue grama 1.0
Little Bluestem 1.0
Sand dropseed 0.1
Western Wheatgrass 1.0
Switchgrass 0_3
4.4
Riparian Mix
Species pls per acre
Switchgrass 3.0
Reeds Canarygrass
6.0
Detention Pond Mix
Species pls per acre
Switchgrass 2.0
Reeds Canarygrass 2.0
Sideoats grama 2—0
6.0
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY
ITEM: Weld County Referral for an Amended Special Review
Permit for Gravel Mining and a Concrete and Asphalt Batch
Plant
PROJECT: Gravel Mining and a Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant
LOCATION: Adjacent and West of 83r' Avenue and Adjacent and South
of "O" Street
APPLICANT: CAMAS, Colorado Inc.
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: November 9, 1999
PLANNING COMMISSION FUNCTION:
Review the proposal for compliance with the City of Greeley's Comprehensive Plan
and make a recommendation to the Weld County Commissioners.
PROJECT OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND:
The original Use by Special Review Permit for gravel mining and a concrete and
asphalt batch plant was approved by Weld County in the early nineties. At this time,
the applicant is requesting to amend the existing Weld County permit in order to add an
additional 70 acres and remove a small portion of Cell one from gravel extraction
activity (see Attachment C).
The amended special use permit boundary includes approximately 340 acres, of which
252 acres will be mined. The applicant has indicated that this will be a dry pit
operation and will include seven phases. The total mining operation is anticipated to
take 13 to 20 years depending on the market demand. It is expected that the operator
will excavate approximately 15 to 25 acres per year and will operate continuously
throughout this time period. There will be a maximum of 35 employees with two shifts
of workers operating during daylight hours Monday through Saturday.
All trucks associated with the use will exit the property onto 83r° Avenue and proceed
north or south. The primary haul route will be 83"d Avenue to State Highway 34 (10th
Street). A temporary access is proposed along 71s` Avenue at the point the Poudre
River Trail intersects 715' Avenue, for the initial mining setup.
FILE COPY
The applicant has indicated that noise levels will comply with the requirements of the
Weld County Health Department. All activities will be regulated by the Mine Safety
and Health Act (MSHA) and the Occupation Safety and Health Act (OSHA). The noise
level will need to comply with residential standards when the Poudre River Ranch PUD
is developed. The reclamation of the land is proposed for water storage and wildlife
habitat (Attachment D).
It is the practice of the City of Greeley Planning Commission to review Weld County
Referrals principally for conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan policies.
Specific design issues are addressed only to the degree necessary to ensure consistency
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. State Law and the
Greeley Development Code require the mining of minerals of commercial grade prior
to development.
SITE DATA:
Property Zoning Weld County Agricultural
Surrounding Land Uses North - Minor Subdivision, Farmland
South - Poudre River Ranch PUD
East - Rural Residence and Farmland
West - Rural Residence and Farmland
Surrounding Zoning North - County Agricultural
South - City of Greeley PUD
East - County Agricultural
West - County Agricultural
Size of Site 340 Acres
Distance to Greeley City Limits Adjacent to City Limits
Days of Operation Monday - Saturday
Hours of Operation Daylight Hours
Number of Employees 35
Duration of Mining Operation 13 to 20 Years
Planning Comm. Summary 2 WCR - CAMAS Mining USR
KEY ISSUES/ANALYSIS:
1. Does the proposal comply with the City of Greeley's Comprehensive Plan?
The applicable City Comprehensive Plan polices which address this request
include:
Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.3
All development is encouraged to be designed to promote compatibility among
neighboring land uses of differing intensity and character. These efforts, where
practical and appropriate, should include complementary landscaping, building
massing, material selection, and site design.
Staff Comment:
Staff understands the importance of economically recoverable gravel and mineral
extraction; however, the plans for such a use need to consider the neighboring
residents and the community as a whole. This site is adjacent to the City limits
and there may be dust and noise impacts to City residents to the south of the site at
Poudre River Ranch, which is currently being developed. The views being
marketed by the developer for the residential area will be highly disturbed during
the 13-20 year mining cycle. Also, the applicant has indicated that the mining
operation will be done during daylight hours Monday through Saturday. At certain
times of year it is daylight as early as 5:30 a.m. Staff recommends that the
mining operation have reasonable and specific hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m. in winter months and 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. in summer months, with
limited hours on Saturday mornings. The hours as proposed would not be
compatible with the existing and developing neighboring land uses.
The applicant identifies 71' Avenue as a temporary access, but does not identify
how long this would be used as a temporary access and what is involved with the
"set up" of the operation. Truck traffic generated from the set up and the
continued operation of the mining would have a major impact to City residents
south of the site. The City's Public Works Department recommends that traffic
associated with the use be restricted from using 7l' Avenue in either direction
south of the site because of the conflicts with adjacent residential traffic and
student traffic from Northridge High School.
The quality of life of surrounding residents and City residents to the south is
important and the applicant should balance all interests through the design and
Planning Comm. Summary 3 WCR - CAMAS Mining USR
operation of the mining activity in order to be compatible with the surrounding
residential land uses.
Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.5
All development is encouraged to effectively mitigate any adverse environmental
impact when development occurs in environmentally sensitive areas.
Staff Comment:
The site is located in an area identified as "high impact" in the City's Mapped
Areas of Ecological Significance and a portion of the site is located where the
future Poudre River Trail is planned. The City's position is that sand and gravel
operation sites should be reclaimed in a manner that enhances both the natural
environment and anticipates future land uses. With the mining activity, a number
of existing wildlife habitat areas will be destroyed. Restoration plans for the
designated "wildlife habitat restoration area" are sketchy. Water storage lakes or
ponds have historically been shown to not be of much value to wildlife other than
as temporary location for some waterfowl since water levels are drawn down
generally throughout the summer during important nesting and spawning times.
Without extensive shoreline habitat improvements, the lakes themselves have little
habitat value.
Cell one is referenced as not being "lined." There is no other reference to lining
the other cells other than by inference as "storage." Lined lakes have even less
habitat value since water tends to stagnate. In order to achieve an adequate habitat
for the wildlife, re-vegetation plans should include appropriate herbaceous
perennials in the grass seed mixture. Trees and shrubs selected for the site should
primarily consist of native species, not ornamental varieties. In order to mitigate
the adverse environmental impact this land use will have on the site, it is
recommended that the habitat restoration and re-vegetation efforts be planned and
monitored by a qualified wildlife biologist/ecologist.
The Poudre River Trail is planned for construction on the southern perimeter of
the site (Attachment F). There is a 100' foot easement shown for the trail in the
area of Cell one. This is adequate for the trail purposes, however, it needs to be
pointed out that construction of this section of the trail is expected to take place
prior to mining activities in Cell one. The projected completion of the trail is June
of 2000. The proposed conveyor crosses the trail in two locations. Any safety or
security measures needed by the mining activities should be the responsibility of
the mining operators, not the City or trail organization. Conversations between
Planning Comm. Summary 4 WCR - CAMAS Mining USR
City staff and the applicant indicate this is acceptable and that the mining operation
will not interfere with the use of the trail by the public.
An additional issue identified by City staff is the permit augmentation
responsibilities for the site. Augmentation is the process of replacing evaporated
water as a result of creating the large bodies of water from the mining process. It
is unclear to staff who will be responsible for meeting the augmentation
requirement, however, it should at least be identified with this review process.
Staff suggests that clarification of the responsible party be a condition of amending
this Special Review permit.
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW TEAM COMMENTS:
The Administrative Review Team reviewed this proposal informally at its meeting on
October 27, 1999. Comments from the meeting have been addressed in this report and
written response from the City's Natural Resource Planner is included as Attachment G.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the proposed
amendment to the Special Review Permit for Gravel Mining and Concrete and Asphalt
Batch Plant complies with the policies and intent of the City of Greeley's
Comprehensive Plan, therefore, recommend approval with the following eight
conditions:
1. Hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in
the winter months and 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the summer months with limited
hours on Saturday.
2. The temporary access on 7151 Avenue clearly defined as to the length of use and
exact type of truck traffic.
3. All traffic generated from the Special Review Use shall be restricted from using
71" Avenue in either direction, south of the site, because of the conflicts with
adjacent residential traffic and student traffic from Northridge High School.
Planning Comm. Summary 5 WCR - CAMAS Mining USR
4. The reclamation plan shall be redesigned in order that the wildlife habitat
restoration and re-vegetation efforts be planned and monitored by a qualified
wildlife biologist/ecologist.
5. The Special Review Permit shall take into consideration the Poudre River Trail
Project.
6. Clarification on who will be responsible for meeting the augmentation
requirement for the site.
7. Noise generated from the site shall meet all City and State requirements.
8. A perimeter treatment plan shall be required along 7ls` Avenue and 83' Avenue.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Vicinity Map
Attachment B - Zoning Map
Attachment C - Mining Map
Attachment D - Reclamation Map
Attachment E - Narrative
Attachment F - Poudre Trail Location
Attachment G - Letter from Natural Resource Planner
Planning Comm. Summary 6 WCR - CAMAS Mining USR
1, T - ATTACHMENT A I
:\- I
�� � �,.� .� � N. X30. -
47],I I . Ite.PU_.. _- .,•___,,t,T I 'O WC h, t
4 M
a VICINITY AP
BM II„Lev
en
II
elf `�.-�.�� B well ��o wN. 2y •.usl,-.. 28 `-Wol,.
T
• R66W ab
-
•d, a
icot pR5 °
.,0 STREET _ - ° ••Farmers2_11[
Nr91
.9.- -
- Nr➢. pp . 4 I4
,44,3 ` 1 4700_-„'4 4b94
;r.s P U
Iit. wI .
1 Q Q 33
/
31
oi - I NID y
47y/ i s��t l
:\::- y/C)r-I — I
one `, + 1� o1e° J _„ `: w /
+ ,,
ab
<I ,fir r i I I iii-JI' r''' f\=' V •- 1 1 4
e ' -- - - I -
A
2 SOURCE OF INFORMATION: U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY, 7.5 MINUTE BRACEWELL
2000 1000 0 2000 QUADRANGLE, 1980.
SCALE IN FEET
Dot.: 6/29/99
Job an' •9-I62 RIVERVIEW RESOURCE TuttleApplegatealnc.
ba.n: 1G3
CaY..b1.i91.val Ptls
ono,. - 119Nd.Y..-.4.904
Checked 51E dy.Q Y0)
ra: vrlam.owc VICINITY MAP T ail 6910$9ie�i�a.,°�m."poedeedeN*+p^
Scale:I. . NCO 1/-
I
```--- ZONING MAP ATTACHMENT B
x
tv. or O STREET
IIIIIIIIIIII II II MIII
I 111111111111111 IIIIII
I I IIIII IIII IIIII I
111111111111' 11 1111 ill - 111111111111'111 III I III 1 [
1111111'11111 111111111111 1111 II 1111111111111111 III 111111 11111111
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
111111111111 IIII 11 1111111111111111 111 I Illlll
I11111111111I111 111111 Lill 111111111111111111111 1111 111H 11111111111111111111
111111 II 111111111111 I 111-----• .�..,��.�` 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1111'111'11 I'_I' III
e
�,..✓ 111111111111 III 11 111111111111111111111 III I I 1 1 1 I 111111 I I 1 ) 111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1,1,1,1,1,1,11,i,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1111111111111 1111
I 111111111111"111 1 1 111111111 I I
111111 II 1 11111111 II
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111111111 1111�.._ W 7111111111111 1111. 11 11111 11111111111111 111 =1 11111d,11�ii
ii I 111 111111 II 'Td111111 I 111ri1'I-rr— i
111111 1111 111111 1111111111111111111111111
111111 1111 11111 11 .y
1 .111 1 1 11111 IJ,I,1141 I I 1111111 1111111111111111
�, a IIII 11 11111 • p1 111 111111111 111 1111111111111111111111111111 W
11111 I I I I Slt.+1 111111 11 ^!' ';ill ;;;-111111111111111111I1I111�1ll� Fes.
11111111111 111 II'1 11111 z �
'rt 11111 II 1111
11111111111 1 IIII 1 1 1 1'1 1'1111 I , f%
-te 11111111111 1111 11 111 1 1 1 1 11 1 111 1111 1 1,� ; I 1 1)I 11111 111 i ,
C IIII < i 11111 11 11 /ll /1 11 1 11111111111111 , ,el • ti
)�
1111111 ' I 111 11 11111111 1111111111 11111 11 1/1111/111111 11
pp 1 1 1 1 I I 1 III III II III I 1 1 1 11I11I�I11I�I tI� I I i N
1111 111 111 II i II ///1111111 IIIII 111 II II
',Cy, j 111111 11 IIIII Illy 3.1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 er' 111111111111111 'p1M�� "<.;
N! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 'f 1 t.,".1
II , 1111 III 11111111111 1111111111 ��
III 111 II 1111111 1111111111
i.
,ill 11111111. 11 1111 d I �I III 111111111 .r,-
. ' I 1111111111111111111111 ` ,, :>.
1L„ 1 111111 11 1111 M11 117: 1 11111 1 111111111111111111111111
• 1 1 1 1p 11 11 I I 111111111111111111111111
^,�� IIII r ♦ 11Irr 111111111111111111111111 C-D
O 1 I/ T^ 'a d�'- _,,..4,4,,,a..„.,„ I 1111 111 11111 11111 111
P � ,,ay Y r. I I I I IIII 1
It 3,..4•0� . s '.�% :� ' ,, 'i v , IIII 11111111111 L.>`'
,x 7'sic d•E 1 ...acrcvc.�
141,44.441#s �� Pia ' — - `
•
I1S c c ..a' 5 ,,,./11‘
v4 t In�� . i 1 ^
"' �) ury"" H °ha 1� e - (mil
I M ? , , 1o.+ a I *' t I lati lI*� I I a
I
col
. ( n
,..6_
r ________ / C"', � =S; '•,..-',.-i'',,,,.‘..e.:,,,.,% ::::::::::::::::.,
���II`•:i`�P. ' NORTHRIDGE r1., 4,,•��%��� HIGH SCHOOL
AF) P
ti
ill • ..4.,.
1 i 1 /
Y ..,,,,,,„:::),„,„}„.„.,/a ::::::...,,,:1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
1,,,,,,„:),„,..,..„,,,,„,,,.,..,
z 4.,-...r,,,,--,,,, �j�. 1
I ,,,.,,,,,,.„,,,,,,„,.„, ..,.,7.,..,..._,,.. . ,,..,„ it
_� � tie }d 1�v st�� r +3+�� r N„ upar ` S
y�x '; 4 � `^eft,\ 1
a tsfi e. tit �, 14,, `v N)%i S, v 11x}*- 1 : asyl,
r ,�.711 'k'4Y 6 v}J m 1 y .. J 1>s-"\`dl'y'G S, v "i I+E I
tAi? l�trt4'�t, 1 { F �„ 9 .. 1S 11 '1 •R„x/3/4 Y �f' ')yxi s`A Y Zy I M 11''2+1111 S c..,-, {x °e ice- hr7x11 X I ,
_/ fie C`L �Y L} sY C 21Jy ydsr .11 XY E ��
x��t4 > �. ,.. � -i. : -�":._ .._ �' • ' �i
ATTACHMENT C
MINING MAP
t
'1 83s"AVENUE " ( be I l°`_
J: ,,..;), : ' 8 1 i; si , ..„.,.„, .
31 ii 11.---.1 : 00
1 1 1 ' ,
8 �i �`," :� 1
a t,.* i�: . \ 'a
POUDRE RIVER __ , . ifp HI v li
fa, trill , -0 /
P -
Q • •• _ / �yy
t� is A
gofer, i . , '- I
•14'4id J� r Ili , 4iin it/tip ••. tirl ..F g J +P 1
fl�r•. * �N „mot? '\i"', all
/ \ ? •11 111111111111 11111 }'I .
S 1 A VI . 111111111111111 1111111111 '. 11. �'I
IIIII [��[�??fJfJ1111III IIIJ
�1 I• I1111I it ll1f 1111111 111 111�11 -I
;i / `"' a I iii IIIIIl111jl.;i;i;111l11 11111'1 III
/ 14 11111- - _14,11111111 11111 1 I' ..I1
(^l - %, E 1.111 I1 11 ��� it'Ili -
4 ‘ j i f 11111111 11111 h
d i )'o / r Ij IiIiI[III' III i II
70 ACRE ADDTION
a ) ( '_1 111111111111 11
/ it
11 111111 !I
' j1 •' I1 11111111111111 L1
Lill 1111I1111111111111111.
SI I1 �' •
11111151111111111111 111 II
1 } r 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 11111 I
na' " 71STAVENUE ' : 9 LI ^. .
1 1 CI
i
1
Ifi �� i li ES • ' ' ' ' "iei Sad s' III di {
i , ,,
iii Ii. Ii: '3? iI III III! W i:l II! I? I ' ii₹ III i�I HI A Ul '•Ir „:„iii. , I1 I'
et
s tf sE • 1• •i r Zen "11 11 I
i E 9$ ee ,
f � i 6t i. 1111 l ��1 .I
�\ .p2, l5`o " I „it
1 ' tti
� . , . y s la ii P 1 111; II' I 7 i1
flit yyE ° i! `i ` III!
!me it ill Hi ie '± 4( 2 S i, EiljjarN i ¢ ill
I It' 611 it I 1 I YISF III' III lei €i' !, Iii $"r! i!t A I °1 i� NIT `�p M!
'e ; I ii I a0 I i f`
I •
nY.
1 ... .. - CAMAS mwnnco INC. a1YO1V1l1M RENOUNCE TuttlaApplep pie,
' ... . ,w. 17,1.�T YM.•O MAM t —n--'- ...s.•.rr
Le 3End MI S3804 ZSVZ6EE0G6 6E:11 6661/SL/01
_ ATTACHMENT O
fi - V RECLAMATION MAP ,
rrrr .. _ ,�_ '• 83"°AVENUE ___--_ ,;r====a I
! ! ( - I :.---J z r/��\\
► 5
r e I la / '/ / I I
I \ �
\' « O iiit. F F•
rI
i'..) POU DRE RIVER)j • 80 1n
' �►► �'1 '•�I,'
ff ! �l ►�1 ,. 1 1 I� P
VI lit
\ u !� F � 1 1 III
--,•:,?.*;& 41.--.74xf i i 11 F4
If. • .: AL / • iv (_er- ;iq
./, y / ,\ �..� I cifi /:17 /I ' ‘ . ; . II
IIJ
I/ al
•
S • °} !k1 '
lz
ifr( j tf ( I ► • i i
li
F f ile.
71ST AVENUE _._..
t sill! l e C
}v I II ill
11iJ
I. IIIhiII ICI II II III III IiI i i
s�ile��ra�E io��eili in
� I
�•. 1 ._ w__.. T COLORADO os MC. (URESOURCEV*nVI W RESOURCE
ouwoc TuHIM..-....
—. .muunglvw
•Er .....—..
10 3Odd AillS3N0.A ZSPZ6EE0L6 6E:11 6661/5Z/0I
NARRATIVE ATTACHMENT E
September 24, 1999
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1550 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Amendment to USR-897 for Sand and Gravel Mining
To Whom It May Concern:
CAMAS, Colorado Inc., is applying for an amendment to Use by Special Review 897 for
Gravel Mining and Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant. The amendment will include an
additional 70 acres into the existing permit boundary. In addition, a small portion in the
existing Cell 1 area will be amended out.
This letter will supply the narrative segment of the application requirements. In addition,
this letter is formatted in the same numerical order as the procedural guide for the
application submittal requirements.
1. The completed application form along with the application fee is attached.
2. A detailed description of the method of the mining operation is as follows:
a. The types and numbers of equipment and facilities can be found in Exhibit
D of the attached Division of Minerals and Geology(DMG) Permit
Application.
b. The maximum number of employees will be 35. The number of shifts will
be 2, which will operate Monday through Saturday, during daylight hours.
c. The operation will be a dry pit.
d. All trucks will exit the property onto 83`d Avenue which is also known as
WCR 27, and proceed north or south. The primary haul route will be from
83`d Avenue south to State Highway 34.
e. The special use permit boundary includes approximately 340 acres, of
which 252. acres will be mined. There will be seven mining phases.
Weld County Planning
CAMAS Colorado,Inc.
Riverview Resource Mining Permit
Page 1
Mining will begin in Cell A, as shown on Exhibit C of the DMG, and then
move to the east to Cell 1.
f. The duration of the mining operation will be 13 to 20 years, depending on
market demand. It is expected that the operator will excavate
approximately 15 to 25 acres per year. This mining operation is intended
to be a continuous operation with no significant cessation in mining.
g. Sand and gravel deposit depth and thickness vary from 4 to 30 feet. The
overburden and topsoil vary in thickness from 2 to 11 feet.
h. Proposed use of the reclaimed land is for water storage and habitat
locations. A full explanation of the reclamation process is described in
Exhibit E of the DMG Permit Application.
3. A list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification numbers
assigned by the Weld County Assessors Office for surrounding property owners is
attached.
4. A list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of minerals on or
under the parcel of land being considered in the amendment is attached.
5. A copy of the reclamation plans as submitted to the State of Colorado DMG is
enclosed for review. Copies of the plan for obtaining water supplies, cross
sections of drainage structures and profiles and typical cross sections of haul
roads will be submitted if deemed necessary by the Board of County
Commissioners.
6. This Use by Special Review application for a mining operation is consistent with
the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive plan allows for and
encourages the extraction of sand and gravel deposits. CM. Goal 2 states that the
County should promote the reasonable and orderly development of mineral
resources. This application and accompanying materials clearly demonstrates
compliance with this goal.
All activities at the mining site are guided by the regulations of the Mine Safety
and Health Act(MSHA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA).
These requirements along with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan,
specifically CM.Goal 4 which states minimize hazardous conditions related to
mining activities and the mining site, will minimize or eliminate the potential
adverse impact of the operation on surrounding properties. The application is
proposing setbacks, noise controls, dust controls and general site conditions which
will help to comply with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Reclamation activities will be concurrent with the mining operation.
Disturbances to the site will be minimized as much as possible. Wildlife habitat
Weld County Planning
CAMAS Colorado,Inc.
Riverview Resource Mining Permit
Page 3
on the site will be preserved throughout the mining by use of the wildlife habitat
area located at the southern edge of Cell 4. In addition, the reclaimed use of water
storage will further promote the use of the area for habitat location.
7. This application is located in the A(Agricultural) Zone District and is listed as a
use allowed by special review under Section 31.4.1 of the Weld County Zoning
Ordinance.
8. The subject site has a limited amount of prime agricultural ground. A majority of
the property lies within the 100 year flood plain which limits the agricultural
productiveness of the site. The area inhabited by the flood plain has historically
been utilized as pasture land.
9. The protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the
neighborhood and the County are being considered by the applicant. Possible
fugitive dust emissions from the site will be minimized by watering and re-
vegetation activities. Noise levels will comply with the requirements of the Weld
County Health Department.
Only one main access point will be used for the truck traffic at the site.
Temporary access locations will be located along 71st Avenue for initial mining
setup.
Through measures taken by the applicant along with the Conditions of Approval
and Development Standards as established by the County through the permitting
process, the consideration of health, safety and welfare of Weld County citizens
will be protected.
10. Surrounding land uses are primarily agricultural in nature. An existing sand and
gravel operation exists to the west. A minor subdivision is located to the north.
The City of Greeley is located to the southeast and the Cache La Poudre River lies
along the south. Compatibility with surrounding land uses will be assured by
setbacks,noise limitations, landscaping measures and Conditions of Approval and
Development Standards as established by the County.
11. Future development of the area is described as open space. The use of sand and
gravel mining with the reclaimed area being utilized as water storage will be
consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan.
12. The subject site is not located in a geologic hazard area or airport overlay district.
However, the subject site does lie within a flood plain area. A flood hazard
development permit will be submitted to adhere to all FEMA rules and
regulations as described in Section 26 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
Weld County Planning
CAMAS Colorado,Inc.
Riverview Resource Mining Permit
Page 4
13. Drinking water to the site will be supplied by Sharkstooth Pipeline.
14. A deed is attached which identifies the applicants interest in the property under
consideration. In addition, a lease agreement is attached for the portion of the
property know as Cells 1 owned by Ed Orr.
15. A noise report is not included, but will be provided if deemed necessary by the
Weld County Planning Department
16. Other information determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners
or the Department of Planning Services will be provided upon request.
Sincerely,
TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC.
LAsta_t_
A
Shani L. Eastin
Planner
CC: TA File#99-182
Connie Davis, CAMAS Colorado, Inc.
Mike Refer, CAMAS Colorado, Inc.
POUDRE TRAIL LOCATION 'Aos ATTACHMENT F
1 SKI! Oe rracist su
+► Location
f•—'a' ' The intersection of 83rd Avenue and WCR 62 is
.. the beginning point of Segment 13. Here,the trail
kit't •- ). - s�-a turns north for 600 feet before completing a 4000
t I foot run to a point just past its crossing of Greeley
No.3 Ditch on property currently owned by Orr.
Significant Features&Landscape Character
�, reeley • tc No. 3 Eastbound, after it crosses 83rd Avenue, the trail
s r Interpretation pastes a remnant river oxbow channel and cattail
s , marsh to the north(on map under symbols)before
Culvert continuing along the south bank of the river.
f � '
'�i" After crossing the return flow end of Jones Ditch,
°;' > I" travellers will encounter the north face of a river
' terrace. Along this sharp face are historic carved
i'' e010 cal names. Just beyond the rock face is the large
R :, g diversion structure for Greeley No. 3 Ditch and
' ° , ' •r4 Inte relation the ditch itself, which nearly equals the width
p' - ,, s• of the river. To continue along the river through
, ,. additional lands owned by On,the trail must
: cross the ditch. A bridge is recommended here.
t+► ' ` `- - �`. The character of this portion of the landscape is
d' .. ' ' • ' currently agricultural but is likely to change very
. �� Slot C Artifact shortly to suburban housing and aggregate mining.
•. i to •relation The river and trail just east of No. 3 Ditch are
s: `° »', • '�' characterized by mature cottonwood groves
standing above grassy floodplain lands. Along
-'r the river between 83rd Avenue and 71st Avenue
* . the cottonwood stands provide cover for white
3
', �. , tail deer.
(` Proposed Improvements
',o •.�. `^t ` , Jr. ' ..,. Because the terrace fomiation and the river are so
close together, ecial techniques will be required
: _ F to construct thesp trail Design and construction
4.
c techniques that avoid river channel filling and
II
that minimize disturbance to the wall face will
1 d ,a be necessary,especially during periods of
t• s rl flooding. Although a detailed study of this area
°! \':•. is beyond the scope of the master plan,
improvements are likely to take the form of a
4c t °e boardwalk,a bank fill and revetment,or a
%' bulkhead wall,in increasing magnitude of cost.
' � } Another concern is the provision of new public
access to a site formerly difficult to reach and
( ; relatively unknown, which may threaten the
H . i •f valued historic artifacts that are located here.
tit .j .F t i The detailed design of this segment and Segment
n F 4 14 will require careful coordination with the
. - landowner,who is presently in the process of
`p 4\k
.' s> proposing a housing project on this site.
ALIA . `` 83R°AVENUE',
1
ti,.........
pi. ou•re - -mng ti,
7T Center Trailhead '4
.... •FEET no •00 1000 NORM
�•' . • ""',-egment • }. 7 ' Trail Segment 14
L
a " Location
s ,` Segment 14 begins just east of the trail's crossing
ys„!°>� of Greeley No. 3 Ditch. It proceeds east along the
4 Al ra;,9 south bank of the river and skirts the edge of
if ,I � 'fr. a' .• cottonwood groves on its way to 71st Avenue.
r "` .>' Upon reaching 71st,it turns south running
" 4. parallel to the road, crosses the No. 3 Ditch once
'x-A.`"n ' ° again before proceeding over a surface grade
{ I crossing of 71st. Once across 71st Avenue the trail
Y will be located on an unimproved county road
tee right of way. The right of way connects 71st
w1a + s � Avenue with a dead end termination of C Street
•�° `; -,:tei about 2000 feet west of its intersection with 59th, ' ` M s Avenue. The total length of Segment 14 is 7800
,q4'1'4,, ' r feet.
�F
Significant Features &Landscape Character
The main features of this segment are the
•` ♦ =<`g , e> G�•e �,. ^� , proximity of the trail to the river,cottonwood
C�•SSIn• . groves along the river,Greeley No. 3 Ditch,a
OA. grade crossing of 71st Avenue,and another
s a 11 P , v constrained clearance route along the north side
sT CUIVeIiil of a steep terrace wall,between the wall and
•i1 314 44. " ;44 Ditch No. 3. The cultural landscape character of
this stretch has a mixed rural and suburban
1
nature.Views throughout this segment are not
distant,but contained by bluffs on the south and
t , river vegetation on the north. Looking west from
{ :_ „ under cottonwoods on the On property,one can
I. 44 j , -.. . t o ;' . " ... view the peaks of the Front Range,however. The
b s, • ,_" a • ;'t,`• river is lined with cottonwood groves that
. ,f' o. support an observed deer herd
t r . , • Proposed Improvanents
V ° Trail improvements to the Orr property will
y`,f f. ` ' "" require cocadination with its proposed
! aN ''- '' development project. A box culvert over Ditch
` `1 ttt i 4.-=',.!--. ;' .= No.3 will be required to cross the ditch,unless
? •g" • '`'x b '`?2 ' the 71st Avenue bridge over the ditch is widened
in the future to accommodate the trail. A grade
d .t 'a a i •3i ' crossing of 71st Avenue will be located at the
point where the road makes a sharp turn. The
ill ':'
4it trail proceeds through an.unimproved county road
P ^4 } t44,
right of way which reverts to a single dirt track
Ir E c ' as it hugs a steep terrace vThll on its way to the
d s "` dead end of C Street Improvements will include
✓ ` - culvert crossings where drainages feed under the
y trail from the bluff, guard rails, and possibly,
r I I retaining walls at the terrace wall.
�� 4 �,.,
,
ii}p I� � L merit ,. sr
v
,. n• 2 '
-3' +• `"d. • 0 FEET 250 500 1000 NORTH
ATTACHMENT G
Community Development MeMO
City of
Greeley
Pia/wing . Ser,taion
Date: October 26, 1999
To: Debbie de Besche, Planner II
From: Karen Scope!, Natural Resources Planner
Subject: WCR 49:99 Camas Mining USR
Here are my comments related to the proposal.
POUDRE RIVER TRAIL: There is a 100' foot easement shown for the trail in the area of Cell
1. This is adequate for the trail purposes. However, it needs to be pointed out that construction
of this section of trail is expected to take place prior to mining activities in Cell 1. (Projected
completion is June of 2000). The proposed conveyor crosses the trail in two locations. Any
safety or security measures needed by the mining activities will be the responsibility of the
mining operators, not the City or trail organization. Conversations with CAMAS
representatives have indicated this is acceptable to them and that they will not interfere with the
use of the trail by the public. An agreement may be appropriate.
WILDLIFE HABITAT ISSUES: This project is proposed in an area designated as "High
Impact" in the City's Areas of Ecological Significance which also corresponds to habitat
information provided to the County by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Throughout the
project narrative, references are made to "preserving" or improving wildlife habitat. It needs to
be understood that a number of existing habitat areas will be destroyed. "Restoration plans" for
the designated "wildlife habitat restoration area" are sketchy. "Water storage lakes or ponds"
have historically been shown to not be of much value to wildlife other than as temporary
locations for some waterfowl since water levels are drawn down generally throughout the
summer during important nesting and spawning times. Without extensive shoreline habitat
improvements, the lakes themselves have little habitat value. Cell 1 is referenced as not being
"lined". There is no other reference to lining the other cells other than by inference as
"storage". Lined lakes have even less habitat value since water tends to stagnate more.
The proposed reclamation plan will "replace" existing land area wildlife habitat with large
water bodies with limited habitat for birds, mammals, and fish unless standards are
implemented that create more shoreline including "bays" with shallow water areas and islands
within the lake bodies. Revegetation plans should include appropriate herbaceous perennials in
the grass seed mixture. Trees and shrubs selected for the site should primarily consist of native
species, not ornamental varieties. Perhaps existing trees and shrubs of appropriate size could
be harvested into an on-site nursery or moved into areas being reclaimed. It is strongly
suggested that habitat restoration and revegetation efforts be planned and monitored by a
qualified wildlife biologist/ecologist - not an engineer.
IMPACTS TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES IN THE CITY LIMITS: There may be dust
and noise impacts to City residents to the south of the site at Poudre River Ranch. This area is
currently being developed (no longer "vacant"). The "views" being marketed by the developer
for the residential area will be highly disturbed during the 13 to 20 year mining cycle.
MEMORANDUM
WIlD TO: Kim Ogle, Planner DATE: November 9, 1999
k FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator W5
SUBJECT: AmUSR-897; CAMAS Colorado, Inc.
COLORADO
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal. This project falls primarily under the Use
by Special Review Permit for Gravel Mining and Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant Standards. Our comments
and requirements are as follows:
COMMENTS:
The original USR-897 included a Road Maintenance and Improvements Agreement between Camas Colorado
and Weld County. A designated haul route was identified along with a commitment to install acceleration and
deceleration lanes adjacent to the main entrance off WCR 27(83rd Avenue). Both items are still in effect and shall
be incorporated into the amendment.
REQUIREMENTS:
Access: If possible, the main access shall be placed to match the entrance to Hall-Irwin and this shall be placed
on the plat. Acceleration and deceleration lanes shall be required onto WCR 27 (83rd Avenue) as per the
Improvements Agreement.
Right-of-Way: Three Weld County roads border this facility. WCR 27 (83rd Avenue) is designated on the Weld
County Transportation Plan Map as an arterial road requiring 100 feet of right-of-way at full build out, there is
presently 60 feet. An additional 20 feet of right-of-way shall be reserved for future widening.
WCR 64 ("O" Street) is identified as a collector status road requiring 80 feet of right-of-way at full build out. There
is presently 60 feet of right-of-way. An additional 10 feet of right-of-way shall be reserved.
WCR 29 (715`Avenue) has been identified by the City of Greeley as a major collector road requiring 80 feet of
right-of-way at full build out, there is presently 60 feet. An additional 10 feet of right-of-way shall be reserved.
All additional right-of-way shall be designated on the plat.
•
Storm Water Drainage: The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmental Process water discharge
permits and storm water management plans for the proposed open pit mining operation. Verification of these
permits shall be supplied to the Department of Planning Services by the applicant.
cc: AmUSR-897
plan2usr
Coa
ri :�ty Pian�nina
e' U -F:
101999 EXHIBIT
r V I ti3 _.
l
/ 11
Weld County Referral
' October 14, 1999
C.
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant CAMAS, Colorado Inc. Case Number AmUSR-897
Please Reply By November 4, 1999 Planner Kim Ogle
Project Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for Gravel Mining and
Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant in the (A)Agricultural zone district.
Legal Lot B RE-1539; Pt of the E2NE4 32-6-66; SW4NW4 33-6-66; W2W2 33-6-66;
E2E2 32-6-66; N2 32-6-66; N2S2 32-6-66 of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location West of and adjacent to WCR 27 (83rd Ave); south of and adjacent to WCR 64 (O
St).
Parcel Number 0805 32 & 0805 33 •
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 7, 1999
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
G2'See attached4Iet er.CN/t�a-cw >
Comments: A U td uz -tc at.L't alt° hR >x- - e-&-c an,
L-L&- 7 16u 7,vr-e Jt24) .c n rr nc ' -'.. S,fent.eras -
Signature y p ,i a �. Date 11/4-795
Agency £L2e4/ / /1212T C di)(
+Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-649614
EXHIBIT
r
veld County Planning C )u
gThi ‘t.„ MO`-! 05 1999
Weld Cou}lffkWal
0 October 14, 1999
•
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant CAMAS, Colorado Inc. Case Number AmUSR-897
•
Please Reply By November 4, 1999 Planner Kim Ogle
Project Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for Gravel Mining and
Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant in the (A) Agricultural zone district.
Legal Lot B RE-1539; Pt of the E2NE4 32-6-66; SW4NW4 33-6-66; W2W2 33-6-66;
E2E2 32-6-66; N2 32-6-66; N2S2 32-6-66 of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. ;
Location West of and adjacent to WCR 27 (83rd Ave); south of and adjacent to WCR 64 (O
St).
Parcel Number 0805 32 & 0805 33
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 7, 1999
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature i --- Date H Li Si
•
Agency 0 ,v ; r`ONA.0 l iCr . .
*Meld County Planning Dept. ••x1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 •?(970)304-649 `
STATE OF COLORADO REFER TO:
Bat Owens,Governor
DEPARTMENT OF NA rURAL RESOURCES GOVO O
DIVISION OF WILDLIFE a .�
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYERiA-�
Q ^^VV�"�(�-�VV
kiln Mumma,DirectorLarry Rogatad,District Wildlife Manager '`Y OF
6060 Broadway 1528 28i"Avenue Court
Denver,Colorado 80216 Greeley,Colorado 80631 For Wildlife-
Trlrplyne(303)297-1192 Phone:970-352-2143 For People
FAX(303)294-0874
November 5, 1999
Mr. Kim Ogle, Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: USR-897, Camas Colorado
Dear Kim:
I received the packet concerning the above referenced application. The information in the packet has
been reviewed and Division Biologists,including myself have visited the site. Over the years I have
reviewed several proposals for this parcel and, on behalf of the Division of Wildlife, have responded by
letter at least five times. These letters should be in your files. The Division's concerns remain the
same today as those expressed in earlier correspondence.
Most of the site is situated in the flood plain of the Cache La Poudre River. The River channel,
wetlands, warm-water sloughs, and dense vegetation associated with low elevation, cottonwood-
willow riparian habitat,provide the most important wildlife habitat in Colorado. Alteration of this
habitat due to development and increasing human activity can have a very negative impact on wildlife
populations dependent on riparian areas. Therefore, from a Natural Resources and Community
Development standpoint, it is essential that we plan for and develop these sites in a way that will
minimize the permanent loss of key wildlife habitat. The Division has appreciated the efforts of your
agency and the Weld County Commissioners to protect riparian areas through the Weld County
Comprehensive Plan.
There are also upland areas on this parcel. These sites,primarily along O Street, are composed of
irrigated agricultural fields put to yearly tillage and subinigated pasture. Because irrigated Ag. fields
are plowed regularly,they have little value for wildlife. Geese, ducks, deer and other herbivores glean
the crop residue, and standing crops may provide escape cover to many species. However the fields
are most important in that they provide a safe haven during high water events, escape from summer
insect concerns, and a movement corridor at times of the year when wildlife needs to move away from
the River.
Based on these considerations, the Division's main concerns involving this development are: the
narrowing of the riparian corridor associated with the Poudre River, obstruction of movement for free
ranging wildlife, loss of warm-water sloughs, loss of wetlands, loss of subirrigated pasture necessary
for preservation of an intact riparian ecosystem, loss of intact wildlife movement corridors along the
River as well as onto upland areas, loss of potential habitat for listed threatened and endangered
species, water quality issues that may impact small fish habitat, and permanent loss of wildlife value
because of increased human disturbance. The Division also feels that the reclamation plan should
address potential recreational/wildlife use of the site post mining. In this letter, I will touch on each of
thee.icalpc
2
It is essential to maintain an intact, unobstructed riparian corridor of adequate width to provide for the
needs and movement of wildlife. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)has identified
this reach of the Poudre River and upstream as a Potential Mouse Protection Area for the Federal and
State listed Preble's meadow jumping mouse, Zapus hudsonius prebliei. Currently, they are
recommending a non-disturbance zone of 100 yards from the centerline of waterways, in either
direction, for preservation of Preble's habitat. In discussion on the final guidelines to be incorporated
in the yet to be completed 4D ruling, some biologists are suggesting that the non-disturbance zone be
extended to 100 feet beyond the 100 year flood zone. Until the 4D rule has been finalized and adopted
there is no official setback. Therefore, unless modified by the USFWS, the Division will recommend
the 100 yard setback from centerline of the River as a non-disturbance zone on this property. It seems
reasonable to honor the conservative standard of 100 yards from the centerline of the river, as a
minimum setback for non-development along the riparian corridor. In doing this the crucial riparian
corridor, essential for species protection and movement by free ranging wildlife would remain intact.
Additionally the Division would recommend that diking in or near the flood zone, intended to
"contain"the river, should not be installed. The ecosystem along Plains streams in Colorado is adapted
for and regenerated by periodic flooding. Diking and other attempts at controlling the River are prone
to failure,negatively impact riverbottom wet meadows, and adversely affects upstream and
downstream neighbors. There is a good reason why development is discouraged in these areas.
Ill-designed fencing in and adjacent to the flood plain of the River can trap and injure wildlife.
Improperly designed fences set along road margins increase the hazard of car/deer strikes. Therefore,
the Division of Wildlife would recommend that perimeter fencing and interior fencing on this site be
kept to a minimum. When necessary, the fences should be of a type that will allow the free movement
of wildlife. Chain link or other fine mesh fencing material should not be used on this site unless
absolutely necessary. These types of fencing should not be used to fence perimeters. Split rail, barb-
wire and three strand smooth/barb wire fences are acceptable alternatives for wildlife. I've included a
couple of designs that provide proper wire spacing for use by wildlife. Where needed,fences
paralleling roads should be set back 50-100 yards from the edge of the road to allow space for wildlife
to view the road before crossing. We recognize the need of the pit operator to maintain security for
the site. If installed, security fencing around the processing area/batch plant should in several locations
be raised two to three inches above ground surface to allow free movement of small mammals.
However, there are many gravel sites along the Poudre, including the Hall Irwin site at 83t Ave, that
operate without extensive security fencing. Therefore there does not seem to be a need.
Warm water sloughs on the property need to be protected to preserve open water when the site is
reclaimed. Warm water sloughs are essential for protecting and holding waterfowl and other wildlife
during bitter cold spells. In the original County Permit the protection of the west slough was stipulated
as part of the permit requirements. There should be a letter on file from the Division to Shani Eastin,
of Tuttle Applegate, outlining our agreement for protection of this slough. The division would
recommend that other warm water and sloughs found on site should be similarly protected.
The pond shoreline contour suggested by Camas Exhibit F for all reclaimed ponds is 3:1 at water edge
and 2:1 at a 10 foot depth. These are standards suggested by the Mined Land Reclamation Board
primarily for safety purposes. The reclamation plan for the site suggests that the ponds will be
reclaimed as water storage reservoirs(fully lined pits). If this is the case, at times some of the ponds
will be drawn down eight or more feet. When this happens the 2:1 contour will be at shoreline.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Greg Watcher,Executive Director
3
Therefore the Division would recommend a 3:1 contour for all lined ponds as a minimum standard.
This should not diminish storage capacity since all areas within the liner including groundwater is
considered storage.
The reclamation plan also states that the other two intents for reclamation are wetlands and wildlife
habitat. We applaud Camas' decision to maintain this portion of the Poudre River Corridor as a prime
wildlife area! To maximize the habitat potential of this site post mining, and offset the significant loss
of riverbottom habitat resulting from the excavation of pits and installation of lined reservoirs, the
Division would recommend that careful consideration be given to the shapes and contours of the
completed pits. Limed, rectangular pits of 2:1 slope offer little vahie as wildlife habitat and/or wetlands.
Lined pits,prone to periodic dewatering offer little in fishery value. Rectangular pits of 2:1 slope offer
little in esthetic, recreational value. The Division would recommend that reclamation of the pits should
establish curved,irregular shorelines with shoals, coves and peninsulas. These protected areas provide
sanctuary for water birds and others in rough weather. Portions of the shoreline should be reclaimed
with shallower slope contours that would allow the restablishment of wetland plant communities.
Contours of 8:1 or shallower will allow the growth of wet grass meadows, rush/sedge wetlands,
bullrush and cattail thickets. Since many acres of this habitat type will be removed during mining it is
imperative to attempt to rebuild as much wet meadow as possible. When established inside the liner
they will store water and may cut down on evaporative loss. Islands may be constructed in the center
of the ponds to provide nesting/resting habitat for water birds. The bottom of ponds should be left
irregular and uneven. Large tree trunks, scrap concrete and other suitable materials can be deposited in
the bottoms and along the edge of the ponds to provide fish structure. The Division can provide
information and support in designing fish "reefs"and other aquatic habitat. In other area pits, the
Division has worked with Boy Scouts and other groups to install tire reefs and other structure prior to
filling new reservoirs while it is easiest to accomplish. Reservoirs should be designed to provide a
conservation pool of appropriate size to protect fish during dewatering.
Revegetation of mined areas is difficult and may take years. We appreciate Camas' intent to perform in
progress reclamation! In other pits we've been involved with,it seems to allow for the quickest site
recovery. Noxious weeds are a problem in most reclamation efforts. The reveg plan states that Camas
will mow during the first growing season if necessary to control noxious weeds. The Division would
recommend a long-term weed plan be developed for the site, including unmined areas. They will in all
likelihood need a plan. Ron Broda, the Weld County Weed Inspector, can help them devise a plan that
will protect the property and surrounding lands.
The seed mixture suggested in the reveg. plan seems composed for upland sites. I spoke with the
range experts at the Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) about this plan. They suggested
that the Luna Pubescent Wheatgrass and Lincoln Smooth Bromegrass be removed from the plant
mixture. They also suggested, and I strongly agree, that Reed Canary Grass,Alkali Cordgrass, Yellow
lndiangrass, and Green Needlegrass be added to the mixture to reestablish the wet meadow complex. I
would also suggest that one or more appropriate legumes for the site be included in the mix. A dryland
Alflafa, Sweetclover, or Bird's Foot Trefoil could be added to provide cover, stand heterogeneity, and
nitrogen fixing capability. Representatives of the NRCS have told me they would be happy to provide
appropriate seed mixtures for the site. Mud clumps of cattatil and bullrush can be dumped at water's
edge to start the reestablishment of the marsh habitat.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Greg Welcher,Executive Director
4
Scotch Pine and Austrian Pine may, with great effort, work on upland sites, but would probably have a
tough go in the alkaline, wet meadows of the flood plain. Therefore, theses species may be taken off
the planting list. Eastern Red Cedar should be used in the River bottom over the Rocky Mountain
Juniper. Additional tree species that may be considered include: Green Ash, Boxelder and Black
Walnut. Additional shrub plants to consider include: wild grape, Cotoneaster, Golden Current,
Skunkbush Sumac, and wild rose. The Division would recommend that emphasis be given to
establishing shrub thickets over trees. Shrub thickets have higher wildlife value. In and close to the
River bottom shrub thickets have been identified as high priority for Preble's mice. If the ponds are
lined, careful consideration should be given to the location of tree plantings. In other lined pits I've
worked on, there was great concern that deep reaching tree roots may penetrate and compromise the
integrity of the pond liner. Plantings should be located in areas that will not interfere with grass
seeding, mowing and other mechanized activities needed for establishing the grass stand. Regardless of
whether the plantings are comprised of trees or shrubs,the installation should be done using a weed
barrier and mulch cover. This technique protects plantings, maintains moist soil for rapid growth and
greatly improves survivability of the plant.
Finally, if it has not been done, it would be wise for the applicant to complete surveys in all appropriate
areas on this parcel for Preble's meadow jumping mouse, and the Ladies'-Tresses, Spiranthes
diluvialis, prior to onset of mining. We assume that wetland delineation has already occurred and if
necessary the Corp of Engineers has been consulted.
On behalf of the Division, I have appreciated the opportunity to review and comment on this proposaL
Be assured that I am available to discuss any questions that Camas, Tuttle Applegate or you may have.
I would also be available to discuss other ideas for this site that would maximize its potential for
wildlife in the 2l"` century. Please feel free to call on me.
Best Regards,
Larry Rogstad
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Greg Walther,Executive Director
t1
/11*� Memorandum
1 TO: Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
� DATE: November 1, 1999
COLORADO ter-
FROM: Sheble McConnellogue, Weld County Environmental
CASE NO.: AmUSR-897 NAME: CAMAS, Colorado Inc
Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for a Gravel Mining and a Concrete &
Asphalt Batch Plant. The following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval:
1) The existing Emission Notice must be modified for the increased operation if the
Colorado Department of Health and Environment determines that such a modification
represents a significant change in emissions or production.
2) All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities
Act, 30-20-101, C.R.S., as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a
manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination.
3) No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site.
4) Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive
dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions.
5) Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site.
6) The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the (industrial limit of 80 dB(A)
as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes.
7) Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County
Department of Public Health& Environment, Environmental Health Services will require
an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit. (13254 WCR
64). The review shall consist of an observation of the system and an evaluation of the
systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. In the event the system(s) is found
to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current Individual
Sewage Disposal System regulations. In the event this system will be used for the
employees, the septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional
Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review
describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be
submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department
of Public Health and Environment. In the event the system is found to be inadequately
sized or constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current
Regulations.
EXHIBIT
8) Adequate toilet facilities shall he provided for the employees.
t6
CAMAS, Colorado Inc.
November 1, 1999
AmUSR-897
Page 2
9) In the event the applicant chooses to utilize a new individual sewage disposal system for
the proposed office facility, a new system shall be installed according to the Weld County
Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations.
,10) The existing NPDES Permit must be amended for the increased operation if the Water
Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment
determines that such a modification represents a significant change in the discharge.
1.1) A dust abatement plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services, Weld
County Department of Public Health & Environment, for approval prior to operation.
The facility shall have sufficient equipment available to implement the dust control as
required by the Environmental Health Services.
12) The applicant shall remove, handle, and stockpile overburden, soil, sand and gravel from
the facility area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions.
13) The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply.(Sharkstooth Pipeline).
14) The installation of the septic system shall comply with the Weld County I.S.D.S. flood
plain policy.
15) The operation shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the Colorado
Division of Minerals and Geology.
16) In the event that five (5) or more acres are disturbed during the construction and
development of this site, the applicant shall obtain a stormwater discharge permit from
the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment.
17) The operation shall be comply with the Mine Safety and Health Act(MSHA).
18) The operation shall comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA).
SM/0883
a
(ft svitHwp
Weld County Referral
C.
October 14, 1999
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant CAMAS, Colorado Inc. Case Number AmUSR-897
Please Reply By November 4, 1999 Planner Kim Ogle
Project Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for Gravel Mining and
Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant in the (A)Agricultural zone district.
Legal Lot B RE-1539; Pt of the E2NE4 32-6-66; SW4NW4 33-6-66; W2W2 33-6-66;
E2E2 32-6-66; N2 32-6-66; N2S2 32-6-66 of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location West of and adjacent to WCR 27 (83rd Ave); south of and adjacent to WCR 64 (O
St).
Parcel Number 0805 32 & 0805 33
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
'Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 7, 1999
U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter +etd County Pi inni,ig i ,p
Comments:
51OV 01 1999
FCPl rr
Signature (� 2 Date - 2A9 - Gf
Agency /,'it—vXeri Seas drec ?a:art :2);$14. . 77
4Weld County Planning Dept. 41555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304--
EXMW
1
:ems
Windsor-Severance
Fire Protection District
To: Weld County Department of Planning Services October 26, 1999
1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley CO. 80631
Attn. Kim Ogle
Re: CAMAS Colorado Inc. Gravel mining and Concrete and Asphalt batch plant
Dear Miss. Ogle,
We find no conflicts with the operation purposed. The fire district does require that any
plans for buildings or above ground storage tanks of any kind. Submit a site plan and
construction plan for review prior to construction. Amounts and Quantaties of any
hazardous chemicals and locations be submitted for approval prior to materials being
brought on site. If you have any questions please contact me at station 1 686-2626.
Jason M St k
F e Prevention Technician
Windsor-Severance Fire Protection District
ph 9-0 686 9596 a Fx 970 686 9611 728 Main Strict �x',t' Windsor,Colorado 80550
/.NT of DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
¢ 17 , CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT
47,-----
/// , c� TRI-LAKES PROJECT OFFICE, 9307 5. PLATTE CANYON ROAD
O ml LITTLETON, COLORADO 80128-6901
+...
,, REPLT TO October 25, 1999
,r4,I s,,IN4' ATTENTION OF:
Ms. Kim Ogle
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631
RE: Camas Pit, Case No. AmUSR-897
Corps File No. 199980651
Dear Ms. Ogle:
Reference is made to the above mentioned project located in Section 32 and 33, Township 6
North, Range 66 West, Weld County, Colorado.
If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and
any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project, either temporary or permanent, in waters of
the United States which may include streams, open water lakes, ponds or wetlands at this location, this
office should be contacted by a proponent of the project for proper Department of the Army permits or
changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at
303-979-4120 and reference Corps file No. 199980651.
Sincerely,
Timo T Care
Chief, Denver Regulatory Office
jb
+eld County Planning Gap:
OCT 28 1999
RECEIV EXHIBIT
FLS
PATNA
OIL&GAS CORPORATION
1625 Broadway, Suite 2000
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 389-3600
December 7, 1999 (303) 389-3680 Fax
VIA FAX (970-304-6498)
& U. S. MAIL
Weld County Department of Planning Services
Attn: Kim Ogle
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631 '1') *1
Re: Weld County Planning Commission Public Hearing c a" r ' ` r
Case Number: AmUSR-897
Township 6 North, Range 66 West, 6th P.M.
Section 32: Portions of the N%:
Weld County, Colorado
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the referenced public hearing for the Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review
Permit for gravel mining, please be advised that Patina Oil & Gas Corporation ("P atina") is the owner of
the oil and gas estate under the referenced lands (the "Lands"). Patina is very concerned about the impact
the mining operation will have on Patina's ability to develop, produce, operate and maintain oil and gas
wells on the Lands. Patina has not waived any rights it has to access the oil and gas under the Lands.
Patina has the right to drill oil and gas wells on the Lands pursuant to existing Colorado Oil & Gas
Conservation Commission well location rules. Patina requests assurance from Welc. County and CAMAS
Colorado, Inc. that the proposed mining operation will not block access or preclude Patina from drilling,
producing, operating and maintaining oil and gas wells on the Lands. Until this matter is resolved by
agreement with CAMAS Colorado, Inc., Patina is not waiving its rights as a leasehold owner. Any
approval of the mining operation should be conditioned upon the preservation of Patina's real property
rights that allow it to make a reasonable use of the surface of the Lands for oil and gas development.
Patina requests that these comments be entered into the record. If you have any question, please feel free
to contact the undersigned at(303) 389-3600.
Sincerely,
PAT, OIL &G S CORPORAITON
David W. Iplc
Vice President
c: Terry Ruby
s.landVdavidAirestone`'dec7991tr doe doe W��Y
10IT
Z5
Hello