The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20002362.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Jack Epple that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for CASE NUMBER: Town of Milliken IGA APPLICANT: Town of Milliken PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson REQUEST: An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: It is the Planning Commission's recommendation that the above mentioned Intergovernmental Agreement meets the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as follows: 1. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 1 states that Weld County will encourage and assist each municipality in establishing an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement. The fcllowing UGB.Policy 1 states, Weld County recognizes that municipalities can and should plan their own futures in terms of the nature and rate of growth. The Town of Milliken has worked with Weld County in establishing this proposed Intergovernmental Agreement. Through this agreement, the Town of Milliken has indicated their interest in planning for responsible growth. The Town of Milliken is assisting the Department of Planning Services in conducting land-use research in the proposed Urban Growth Boundary Area. A direct outcome of a commitment to conserve natural and managed resources while directing growth and enhancing economic devetbpment through efficient use of infrastructure. (Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1) 2. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 2 and UGB.Policy 2 indicate that Urban development shall be concentrated in or adjacent to urban growth boundary areas that provide an official designation between future urban and non-urban uses. These boundaries shall be established through an intergovernmental agreement between the municipality and the County. The Town of Milliken has delineated their Urban Growth Boundary on the attached map. Through this Intergovernmental Agreement, the Town of Milliken has specified the future growth of their community. Further, it is noted that Weld County recognizes that it is appropriate for its municipalities to plan for growth at their current boundaries and in the surrounding areas. (Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1). 3. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 3 states that the County and municipalities should coordinate land use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and standards, zoning, street and highway construction, open space, public infrastructure and other matters affecting orderly development. Through this Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Milliken, these principles will be met. The county recognizes that an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is by far the best tool tor coordinating development for municipal/county interface. (Page 3-1, Comprehensive Plan.) It is further noted that the County Commissioners imparted the following criteria to guide the municipalities in developing their urban growth boundaries. These guidelines are the impetus for many communities in establishing an Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County: 2000-2362 RESOLUTION, Milliken IGA Milliken LG.A. Page 2 1. Growth should pay for itself in terms of initial costs, and in the long range, through good design and functional efficiency. 2. Annexation patterns should directly correlate with municipal service areas. 3. Infill of communities is a far more efficient use of land than urban sprawl. As outlined on pages 3-1 and 3-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the county recognizes that when growth at the municipal/county level is not coordinated, problems arise. Additionally, when a municipality and the County enter into an Urban Growth Boundary agreement, the County agrees to abide by the municipality s vision for future development in the area. Likewise, the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services. It is understood that urban growth is an ongoing process and Urban Growth Boundary agreements will be subject to revision as needed. 4. The county recognizes that through intergovernmental agreements the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services, therefore, participating in responsible growth. It is this belief that Weld County and the Town of Milliken desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement. The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination 'n the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas surrounding each municipality. The community of Milliken exercises governmental authority over the same matter within its boundaries; including annexations. The premise for this Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the seven previous agreements this board has approved. Customized modifications include the following: 1. Section 3.3 (a) The last sentence was modified to include, "The County will not consider such proposal for Development unless the applicant or its predecessor has submitted a complete annexation petition and been denied said annexation by the municipality Board or electorate for a substantially similar development on the same property within the preceding 12 months."This was added to strengthen the coordination in planning between the community's future growth and the development process in the county. 2. Section 3.5(iii)was removed. This subsection was eliminated because it was redundant to previous subsections and often provided confusion in Section 3.5. "That the MUNICIPALITY's anticipated zoning classification of the property is unreasonable because of existing or planned uses of adjacent property." It is the opinion of the Planning Commission and at the direction of the County Attorney that this Intergovernmental Agreement be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with favorable recommendation. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. Motion seconded by Stephen Mokray. RESOLUTION, Milliken IGA Milliken I.G.A. Page 3 VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Cristie Nickles Fred Walker Bryant Gimlin Arlan Marrs Jack Epple John Folsom Stephen Mokray Michael Miller The Chair declared the resolution failed for lack of a majority and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Trisha Swanson, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on April 4, 2000. Dated the 4th of April, 2000. .A err lta1/4 W oti„O o-- Trisha Swanson Secretary SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION April 4, 2000 Page 2 Monica Daniels-Mika, Director of Planning Services, presented Case Z-538 and noted that the applicant is asking for a continuance until the July 18, 2000 Planning Commission as they are working with the City of Longrnont to annex. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this applicatior No one wished to speak. Stephen Mokray moved that Case Z-538 continued until July 18,2000 Planning Commission. Cristie Vicklas seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. John Folsom, yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant G nilin, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: Milliken IGA APPLICANT: Town of Milliken PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson REQUEST: An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County. Anne Best Johnson, Long Range Planner, presented the Town of Milliken IGA. The Department of Planning Services is recommending approval of this application. Anne showed the changes to the IGA from previous IGA's. These changes are as follows: the removal of Section 3.5 (iii) as it was redundant to previous subsections and a time limit of 12 months for submitting a substantially similar request to the county after an annexation has been denied by the town. LR. Schnelzer, Town of Milliken administrator, stated that the town worked on a comprehensive plan from 1995-1998, then worked on the Highway 34 corridor plan, where they started to develop the IGA wit the county. J.R. stated that the Urban Growth Boundary is limited to where the town will be able to provide sewer and water. Arlan Marrs asked about the areas serviced by Little Thompson water, which is not mentioned in the plan J.R. stated that they are finalizing an agreement that is just verbal now where each water provider will keep their current customers. Bryant Gimlin asked if the property owners in the affected areas were aware of this proposal. J.R. stated that the owners were notified of public meetings in the paper, as well as notices mailed to the property owners. even some phone calls. J.R. further stated that they had received no negative responses to the proposal. John Folsom asked if an agreement had been made with Johnstown concerning the boundary between the two towns. J.R. stated that WCR 19 was a verbal agreement, that this IGA will set the precedent for Johnstown's UGB. Fred Walker questioned J.R. concerning a gravel pit application that was denied, stating that the town had made some requests upon the site to keep it from being mined. J.R. stated that the land owners had been given some requirements for the site in order to approve, but that anyone who wished to buy the land and mine it would have the same requirements placed upon the application. Fred stated a dislike for the town being able to affect land outside the city limits, while those property owners had no vote within that town. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak foi or against this application No one wished to speak. John Folsom was concerned with the need for IGA's as there might be a citizen initiative that might change these IGA's. Lee Morrison stated that even if the initiative does pass, there will be several years before any affect begins to show. SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION April 4, 2000 Page 3 Jack Epple moved that the Intergovernmental Growth Agreement for Milliken be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephen Mokray seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Panning Commission for their decisior. John Folsom, no; Arlan Marrs, no; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, no; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant Gimlin. yes. Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, no. Motion fails. Fred Walker excused himself from Case Z-536 as he is a member of the ditch company that flows through the property. CASE NUMBER: Z-536 APPLICANT: Robert L. Parsons - Skylark Ranch PLANNER: 'Sheri Lockman LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of AmRE-2357; Part of the SE4 & SW4 of Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. REQUEST: Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from Agricultural to Estate. LOCATION: Approximately 800' north of Hwy 14 and approximately 1/2 mile east of WCR 15. Sheri Lockman, Planner,presented Case Z-536 and read it into the record. Sheri stated that the Public Works Department and Colorado Department of Transportation had been working with the applicant concerning the access. They have arrived at a solution which includes moving the lot lines of the existing recorded exemptions. Sheri noted that Condition of Approval 1B was added. Arlan Marrs asked why the access had to be changed. Diane Houghtaling, Public Works, stated that they felt the access was too close to the ditch and could be a potential safety problem. John Folsom asked if there would still be a school bus loading area, which Diane stated yes. Robert Parsons, applicant, stated that his own residence wil be on Lot 5 of this subdivision. Arlan Marrs asked if it was going to be a problem to move the lot lines. Mr. Parsons stated that he owns both lots that need the change and has been through the procedure before. John Folsom asked if the applicant had too long of a cul-de-sac. Mr. Parsons stated that it is 25'longer than the allowed 1500', but that he is looking to have that allowed as the fire district is going to have the pressure it needs. John also asked if the ditch company had been notified. Robert stated that they were not notified. Sheri stated that she had tried 5 phone calls to get a ditch company for the area, only to find it was the incorrect company. The correct ditch company will be notified as a condition of approval. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application No one wished to speak. Robert Parsons asked if the Planning Commission could change the requirement on the cul-de-sac length. Lee Morrison stated that the Planning Commission does not have the authority,but if the applicant could bring information showing that the fire district is comfortable with the agreement being made, the Board of County Commissioners has the authority to change that requirement. Stephen Mokray moved that Case Z-536 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Michael Miller seconded the motion. The Vice-Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision John Folsom, yes; Arian Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant Gimlin, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Fred Walker returned to the panel. 41t itat'tn MEMORANDUM WIWine TO: Weld County Planning Commission DATE: March 6, 2003 COLORADO FROM: Anne Best Johnson, Long Range Planner SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Agreement for Milliken and Weld County Since 1995, Weld County has been working with communities in establishing Intergovernmental Agreements. For your consideration, the Milliken and Weld County agreement has been prepared It is the Department of Planning Services recommendation that the above mentioned Intergovernmental Agreement meets the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as follows 1. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 1 states that Weld County will encourage and assist each municipality in establishing an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement. The following UGB.Policy 1 states, Weld County recognizes that municipalities can and should plan their own futures in terms of the nature and rate of growth. The Town of Milliken has worked with Weld County in establishing this proposed Intergovernmental Agreement. Through this agreement, the Town of Milliken has indicated their interest in planning for responsible growth. The Town of Milliken is assisting the Department of Planning Services in corducting land-use research in the proposed Urban Growth Boundary Area. A direct outcome of a commitment to conserve natural and managed resources while directing growth and enhancing economic development through efficient use of infrastructure. (Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1' 2. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 2 and UGB.Policy 2 indicate that Urban development shall be concentrated in or adjacent to urban growth boundary areas that provide an official designation between future urban and non-urban uses. These boundaries shall be established through an intergovernmental agreement between the municipality and the County. The Town of Milliken has delineated their Urban Growth Boundary on the attached map. Through this Intergovernmental Agreement, the Town of Milliken has specified the future growth of their community. Further, it is noted that Weld County recognizes that it is appropriate for its municipalities to plan for growth at their current boundaries and in the surrounding areas. (Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1). 3. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 3 states that the County and municipalities should coordinate land use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and standards, zoning, street and highway construction, open space, public infrastructure and other matters affecting orderly development. Through this Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Milliken, these principles will be met. The county recognizes that an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is by far the best tool for coordinating development for municipal/county interface. (Page 3-1, Comprehensive Plan.) It is further noted that the County Commissioners imparted the following criteria to guide the lillSERVICE, FLAN/MORK,INTEGRITY.QUALITY municipalities in developing their urban growth boundaries. These guidelines are the impetus for many communities in establishing an Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County: 1. Growth should pay for itself in terms of initial costs, and in the long range, through good design and functional efficiency. 2. Annexation patterns should directly correlate with municipal service areas. Infill of communities is a far more efficient use of land than urban sprawl. As outlined on pages 3-1 and 3-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the county recognizes that when growth at the municipal/county level is not coordinated, problems arise. Additionally, when a municipality and the County enter into an Urban Growth Boundary agreement, the County agrees to abide by the municipality's vision for future development in the area. Likewise, the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services. It is understood that urban growth is an ongoing process and Urban Growth Boundary agreements will be subject to revision as needed. 4. The county recognizes that through intergovernmental agreements the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services, therefore participating in responsible growth. It is this belief that Weld County and the Town of Milliken desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement. The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas surrounding each municipality. The community of Milliken exercises governmental authority over the same matter within its boundaries; including annexations. The premise for this Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the seven previous agreements this board has approved. Customized modifications include the following 1. Section 3.3 (a) The last sentence was modified to include, "The County will not consider such proposal for Development unless the applicant or its predecessor has submitted a complete annexation petition and been denied said annexation by the municipality Board or electorate for a substantially similar development on the same property within the preceding 12 months." This was added to strengthen the coordination in planning between the community's future growth and the development process in the county. 2. Section 3.5 (hi) was removed. This subsection was eliminated because it was redunoant to previous subsections and often provided confusion in Section 3.5. "That the MUNICIPAI_IT'Ys anticipated zoning classification of the property is unreasonable because of existing or planned uses of adjacent property." It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff and at the direction of the County Attorney that this Intergovernmental Agreement be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with favorable recommendation. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. SERVICE,'I INTE(RITY,QUALITY INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Town of Milliken and Weld County Case Number Ordinance Submitted or Prepared Prior to At Hearing Hearing 1 Staff Comments (2 pages) X 2 Press Release X 3 Coordinated Planning Agreement application (7 pages) X 4 Referral List X 5 Referral Letter X 6 Letter to the Town of Milliken X 7 Weld County Public Health and the Environment, referral X received, 2/29/2000 8 Planning Commission Field Check, received 2/6/2000 X 9 Johnstown Fire Protection District, referral received 3/1/2000 X 10 West Greeley Soil Conservation District, referral received X 2/28/2000 11 Map, prepared by the Town of Milliken X 12 Division of Wildlife, referral received 3/9/2000 (3 pages) X 13 Welborn Sullivan Meck &Tooley, P.C., for Union Pacific Rail X Road, referral received 3/7/2000 (4 pages) 14 Affidavit of Publication in the South Weld Sun X 15 Weld County Department of Public Works, referral received X 3/9/2000 16 Milliken Fire Protection District, referral received 3/2/2000 X 17 Town of Johnstown, referral received 3/16/2000 X 18 City of Greeley, referral received 3/10/2000 X 19 Little Thompson Water District, referral received 3/20/00 X 20 Town of Gilcrest, referral received 3/28/00 X 21 Fax Correspondence between Planning and Attorney (2 pages) X 22 Fax Correspondence between Planning and Milliken (5 pages) X 8 Items submitted at planning commission I hereby certify that the 22 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Sec\ices at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded *o the Clerk to the Board's office. > Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES bT� PHONE (970) 353-6100, E.KT 3540 f FAX 04-6 E • 17TH r�7 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO February 22, 2000 Town of Milliken Drawer 290 Milliken, CO 80543 Subject: Ordinance 215 -Milliken IGA- Request for a An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County on a parcel of land described as of the 6th P.M., Weld Courty, Colorado. Dear Town of Milliken: Your application and related materials for the request described above are being processed. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for March 21, 2000, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in Room 210, Weld County Planning Department, 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Coloradc. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members may have. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property or if the property is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Gilcrest, Greeley. and Johnstown Planning Commissions for their review and comments. Please call the town of Gilcrest at 970-737-2426, the city of Greeley at 970-350-9780, and the town of Johnstown at 970-587-4664 for further details regard:ng the date, time, and place of these meetings. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Gilcrest, Greeley, and Johnstown Planning Commission meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four(24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call. Respectfully, y ,rP'12� Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner .4f I iI I'' ' FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA DATE of INSPECTION . .2,1' �00 APPLICANTS NAME: Town of Milliken p(anni' eld County PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson lc:Fg 29 zO • REQUEST: An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld oun y. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. R.E C E I V E ( LOCATION: Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. LAND USE: N .qf,9 C '% n' e.d0,4, ___-- E ---- S -, W jie' ' re/F.4C �' flaw c.,t- ✓O,4s'7'v l-ir..4/ ZONING: N A(Agricultural) E A (Agricultural) S A (Agricultural) W A(Agricultural) COMMENTS: A.C. Member 1171 REFERRAL LIST NAME:Town of Milliken CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA REFERRALS SENT: February 22, 2000 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: March 3, 2000 COUNTY TOWNS and CITES _X_Attorney __Ault _X Health Department G, .211 oc __Brighton Extension Service Broomfield Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriffs Office Eaton _X_Public Works Erie Housing Authority Evans _Airport Authority Firestone Building Inspection _Fort Lupton Code Enforcement Frederick STATE: Garden City Division of Water Resources _X_Gilcrest Geological Survey _X Greeley _Department of Health Grover Department of Transportation Hudson Historical Society _X Johnstown Water Conservation Board Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey Division of Wildlife: LaSalle West of 1-25(Loveland) Lochbuie _X_East of 1-25(Greeley) Longmont Division of Minerals/Geology Mead FIRE DISTRICTS Milliken Ault F-1 New Raymer Berthoud F-2 Northglenn Briggsdale F-24 Nunn Brighton F-3 Pierce Eaton F-4 Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 Thornton Fudson F-7 Windsor _x• Johnstown F-8 La Salle F-9 Mountain View F-10 COUNTIES _X_Milliken F-11 Adams _Nunn F-12 Boulder Pawnee F-22 Larimer Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES l oudre Valley F-15 US Army Corps of Engineers Raymer F-2 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Aviation Administration Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Communication Commission Wiggins F-18 lUnion Colony F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER Fort Collins _X School District RE-5J _X_Greeley - 2t-' C � _4X_Ditch Companies: Little Thompson, Loveland/Greeley Longmont Thompson/Platte, Hillsboro West Adams _2XiRailroads: Union Pacific, Great Western _ COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER WNW _X John Folsom n f>p 4 - a IfWeld County Referral 0 February 22, 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson Project • An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County. Legal See attached map. Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. • • Parcel Number • The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature Date Agency +Weld County Planning Dept. ÷1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 4-(970)353-6100 ext.3540 (x(970)304-6498 fax tf &ft A lill Weliii d County Referral C(TM February 22:, 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: I Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGP Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson —Y Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld Co[nty Legal See attached map. -- Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. _— P3rcel Number .. . ,._..._.n._..� .............. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 --__ Cl We have reviewed the request and find that it does/aoes not comply with our Comprehensive °lan la We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature 2/ .M /29 7;1 7-c.�d" Q JUL Date �� y(✓_ N. U Agency / L4-l( OPI1 +Weld County Planning Dept. :•1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 )(970)353-61[0 ext.3540 +(970)304-6493 fax EXHIBIT 1 7 ft ^ll '°,d�°u,r,'ur Weld County Referral �IM F Ps .y euuu — C. RECEIVED iii I Y February 22 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 . Milliken IGP, Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson -- Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld Cat my Legal See attached map. _, L cation Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. -- Parcel Number ... . . . .._............,.. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 --_ ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive ,'tan XWe have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests ❑ See attached letter. Comments: u Date Signature /..j�o-i �eze/ie 1-.) ii�a�' (.? -! - f- e Agency , .Ial litum- tiet., (C e rat'?feat .--ia-Eze=e` +Weld County Planning Dept. 41555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fae a d &f, 1%wr)to Veld County Planning ----TMMAR o2 2WeidIFIR County Referral iiiiii 'K I C February 2., 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Aoplicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson • Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County • Legal See attached map. -, Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. -- Y Parcel Number �..v. ... _�_.,_,.. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommends ion you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that ,ve may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may he deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 J We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive plan Q'" We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: ;;ignature 'ft,O.Q Z . Date o1Zg! 61---- Agency (J aX-LLQJ 17 +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO. 80631 )(970)353-61C0 ext.3540 ••.(970):S04-6498 tax liTi STATE OF COLORADO BM Owns,Governor c°WT4°o DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE ,� AN EGW .aPPORM1Y®,OLO/ER if; 140 John W.Mumma,Di eaor *op EORD B, ay Denver,norado 6 For Wildlife- Telephone:(303)287-1192 For People Larry Negated,District Wildlife Manager March 9, 2000 1528 28*Avenue Court Greeley,Colorado 80634 Phone:970-352-2143 Anne Best Johnson,Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 1t Avenue Case: Ord. 217-Kersey Greeley, Colorado 80631 Ord. 215-Milliken Dear Anne, I received the abover referenced packets concerning intergovernmental agreements, between Weld County and the Towns of Kersey and Mil iken,which when approved will establish a coordinated process for land use planning and regulatory powers. The Division of Wildlife applauds your efforts to provide coordinated land use planning in areas surrounding towns in Weld County. With the current building boom along the Front Range, it is essential that local governments work together in an effort to maximize efficient,reasonable growth and to provide the best service to shared customers. The division's only concern with the draft agreement is the lack of any statement concerning the protection of precious natural resources, wildlife, and open space. We feel that these elements are critical to sound and progressive land use planning efforts! If land use planning neglects quality natural resources,the resulting development may be less attractive for people, and may create long term negative impacts on adjacent systems. Therefore,we would recommend that in paragraph 1 (Purposes and objectives)on page 1, sentence two should be modified as follows;The objectives of........ ... . of the inhabitants and natural resources of the area Oka by......._ Thank you for the opportunity to review these draft agreements. Please contact me if I can be of further service. Best Regards, Larry Rogstad Cc Dave Clarkson,Area Wildlife Manager DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Greg Welcher,Executhe Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION,Chuck Locale.Chairmen•Mark LeVasy,Vice-Chekman•Bernard L Black Jr.,Secretary Rick Enatrem,Member•,Phillp James Member•Marianna Raacpouloa,Member Arnold Seleatr,Member•Bob Shoernalcer,Member •Greg Welcher,Non-Voting Member •Don Ament,Non-Vet g Member 2 'd EbT2-Z5E-OL6- T edtlprll9 Jo outstAtU a t, TT 00 6O Wei4 Welborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, P.C. Attorneys it I.aw 1775 She-man Street,St ite 1800 )enver,Colon,lo 80203 Telephone: 30:1-430-2500 Facsimile: 3M-432-2366 E-mail: wsmt4 aol.com Join %APrhorn iepher. Nn;l p,in da F ^deck 1<eit ) 'Cooley March 3, 2000 Vend , itJoncs Brit rnnl,v Mla' G l.utos Molly le Churn., '1/4,1,Kop Via Facsimile 970-304-6498 Ardharn Ic,psiin Slept- « i. Ra:n and U.S. Mail A i I `l.'ns Danis I l' nlrh c,,,r:nel Ms. Anne Best Johnson aober w horn Weld County Planning Department spa, ,,,,ull,el 1555 N. 17th Avenue A I , I-atlas N Greeley, CO 80631 ,r,nnn� =.nriv.Ir. RE: Proposed Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the Town of Milliken and between Weld County and the Town of Kersey Dear Anne: Enclosed are two letters for the members of the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners for Weld County with respect to the proposed Intergovernmental Agreements between Weld County and the Town of Milliken and between Weld County and the Town of Kersey. Please provide the members of the Planning Commission with a copy of the letter in the hearings on the two agreements to be held on March 21, 2000 and please make the letters a part of the record in each of the proceedings. Very truly yours, 222/299a- Molly Sommerville MS:crh Enclosures cc: Mr. Tom Maranzino (w/encl.) de1d Count l Plannln Marla Jones, Esq. (w/encl.) 9 9O® Mr. Dan Casper (w/encl.) e�P9- 0 EXHIBIT pr reed on r..vclea paper Welborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, P.C. Attorneys :it Law 1775 She-man Street,S. ite L800 I)ern er,Color.*,l0 802113 Telephone: 30:5-530-2500 lace m ile: 303-132-2366 March 3, 2000 E-mail: wsm1G aol.com dahr. Welborn F lrpher 9ubivan J a IC Fleck Via Facsimile 970-304-6498 Ke1' ) bird y Rend I'.i ones and U.S. Mail Rri i n oby M:.r. b L Gies 'dolly 4. . ..rnevllle Members of the Planning Commission Mrla.e and the Board of County Commissioners 9iSteil `R"pA run un for Weld County A, 15:55 N. 17th Avenue Mann] \ Greeley, CO 80631 i ,:irr1 Holier Wel burn RE: Proposed Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the she Town of Milliken )". ' "'°' IC,rm:m` tiarly.dr. Ladies and Gentlemen: This law firm represents Union Pacific Resources Company ("UPRC") with respect to land use matters in Colorado that may affect the mineral interests owned by UPRC or its affiliate, Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation ("UPLRC"). UPLRC and UPRC together own extensive mineral holdings throughout Weld County. Weld County has in the past recognized the general principle of law in Colorado that a County regulation that prohibits an oil and gas well from being drilled in a location that has been approved by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is preempted by state Ilaw. I UPRC assumes that the County and the Town of Milliken will recognize this principle when it applies the provisions in the Coordinated Planning Agreement ("Agreement") to any notices o- applications that are filed with either governmental entity for a permit to drill an oil well and specifically when the entities apply the provisions in the Agreement in Section 3.3 (t). Very truly yours, — - - Molly Sommerville cc: Mr. Tom Maranzino Marla Jones, Esq. Ken Wonstolen, Esq. Mr. Dan Casper 1 See Lundvall Bros.,Inc. v. Voss, 812 P.2d 693 (16 Colo. App. 1990), affd. Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc., 831 P.2d 1061 (Colo.1992); Bowen/Edwards Assoc.,Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs., 812 P.2d 656 (Colo. App.1990), affd in part and rev'd in part, 831 P.2d 1045 (Colo. 1992). �U'` p mod or:- velerr paper Welborn Sullivan Meek & Tooley, P.C. Attorneys : t Law 1775 Sherman Street,S. to 1800 Denver,Colors.0 80203 'telephone: 303+30-2500 Facsimile: 303 t 32-2366 March 3, 2000 E-mail wsmte rol.corn John 1 A'elanrn S epnen r.:71 van d.fi 1.!,leek Via Facsimile 970-304-6498 Keith T.eey and U.S. Mail K.,ncl. I' 'nes r•ru:: (. Mart L.true Molly So mernlle Members of the Planning Commission rhomar Mt Kee and the Board of County Commissioners vllhan1 Ko;"°n Step]ie A_li,nn for Weld County A., Vetp 1555 N. 17th Avenue Oanle n ' 'rent Et Greeley, CO 80631 n.,1 'tither! I heL nom RE: Proposed Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the Scae n9,l Town of Kersey W ,.Ir. Ladies and Gentlemen: This law firm represents Union Pacific Resources Company ("UPRC") with respect to land use matters in Colorado that may affect the mineral interests owned by UPRC or its affiliate, Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation ("UPLRC"). UPLRC and UPRC together own extensive mineral holdings throughout Weld County. Weld County has in the past recognized the general principle of law in Colorado that a County regulation that prohibits an oil and gas well from being drilled in a location that has been approved by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is preempted by state law.' UPRC assumes that the County and the Town of Kersey will recognize this principle when it applies the provisions in the Coordinated Planning Agreement ("Agreement") to any notices or applications that are filed with either governmental entity for a permit to drill an oil well and specifically when the entities apply the provisions in the Agreement in Section 3.3 (f). Very truly yours, Molly Sommerville cc: Mr. Tom Maranzino Marla Jones, Esq. Ken Wonstolen, Esq. Mr. Dan Casper 1 See Lundvall Bros.,lnc. v. Voss 812 P.2d 693 (16 Colo.App. 1990), affd. Voss V, Lundvall Bros., Inc., 831 P.2d 1061 (Colo.1992); Bowen/Edwards Assoc.,Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs., 812 P.2d 656 (Colo. App.1990), affd in part and rev'd in part, 831 P.2d 1045 (Colo. 1992). z� m rtedon s. oeJ 03ner of Milliken desires to have c' -ect influence on the planning id design of these areas. The north edge of this urban growth boundary has been defined as U.S. 34, the south as the S. Platte River and the East edge as County Rd. 19 centerline. - , URBAN GROWTH LLVIITS .0 i_. ' US 34 -n r i Lc, or Pi Cia REEI I f L JOHNS �,� k I .� SH 60 r._._ t $.25. i�. q- �` 0 , , --- �,I l I — s �- p �__ - - -- t . . . __ City Limits ear Long Term f Design Workshop, Inc. © 1998 EXHIBIT I Ii REci CEIVE:€t, tp, 1=E6 2 4 2000 LIC WORKMeld County Referral deki County p�,-nntng t bruary 22, 2000 -- COLORADO �'a`� 1 . 000 X RECENEn The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County Legal See attached map. __— Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. _-:. Parcel Number . ..,._. .. .,.., - The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may oe deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further qL estions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive °lan D( We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature �i,, �_ (444.443-j Date 63._O,1j - Cr;- Agency P ,/,//-C 3(—)2•12 +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO.80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 304-6493 fax EXHIBIT I (C7 ,de d County Planning 1-iii, 6 iliii" i��A`', � 200() Weld Cdithf '1 P1 i)Arral LIO February 22, 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson • —_ 3 Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County. Legal See attached map. • _—__ Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 -- U We have reviewed the request and find that 11C:4/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter Comments: Signature `�`'----4c�`t�-.,G'// f /I Date J ; or) --- Agency )yl2/ t . n, YjtvX ivy,/ +Weld County Planning Dept. •'1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO. 80631 •:•(970)353-6130 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 f;,x EXHIBIT I ae'd County Flanntilg i ft &I\ I her ,.• . ; 1 7 ?Of' fr � F Referral « � � We County O February 22, 200C • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: I Aoplicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA is Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and Weld County. Legal See attached map. Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. Parcel Number ,„..,.. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you coisider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. VVeld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan g1 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. o See attached letter. Comments: ,, { - r' /. .,,j . - (�� -25/(a Signature � i,'F.w(� L fi_ - Date - /4:4,t, Agency / ./Its\f2)LPc„, > +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fex Ili r1 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN City of 1100 10TH STREET,GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 (970)350-9780 FAX (970) 350-9F! 0 Greeley March 10, 2000 Anne Best Johnson Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Subject: Milliken Intergovernmental Agreement Dear Anne: Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Weld County and Milliken. While it should be noted the proposed location for the agreement is not in an area Greeley expects to grow into, and therefore should have little impact on Greeley, several comments did arise during our review, including: 1. Section 3.1 - Suggest adjusting the last sentence. As written, a municipality can comment, but there are no assurances the municipality's concerns will be taken seriously. There is no binding process that will provide assurances the interests of both the County and the Municipality will be protected. 2. Section 3.3(c) - Suggest adjusting the first sentence. It should be the responsibility of both the developer and municipality to provide water and sewer to the proposed properly in the Urban Growth Area, not the municipality's sole responsibility. 3. Section 3.3(d) - Suggest changing the first sentence to include the underlined phrase, "..will require public water service, capable of providing the needed fire flow for fire protection purposes, and sewer service... The capacity of the water system to provide domestic and fire protection water is critical to prudent and reasonable subdivision requirements as well as health, safety and welfare issues. It also improves the ability of a municipality to provide adequate water service as the municipality grows. Thanks again for the opportunity to comment on this proposed IGA. Sin erely, Gre ho son a i --" Pla ing anager t LITTLE s HOMPSON WATER DI._ A RICT DIRECTORS: Tom Reynolds Telephone(970)532-2M 5 President r E.Highway 56 Leo Bakal Drawer G Keith Croonquist Berthoud,Colorado 80', 3 Glenn W.Gibson Dean Anderson Carey J.Selomonson Jaynes V/Stroh MANAGER: Richard i.H Miami March 16, 2000 Ms. Anne Best Johnson Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 215-Milliken 1GA Dear Anne; I have reviewed your proposed intergovernmental agreement with Milliken and have found an omission in section 3.3 "Development in Urban Growth Area" subsection C' and D. The Little Thompson Water District provides service to several tapholders within the proposed Milliken UGH. The water service agreements of July 20, 1999 and August 19, 1999 are between Milliken and the Central Weld County Water District and Greeley for wholesale water for municipal use. There is presently no such agreement with our water district. I am including a District map of the Milliken area which details the extent of our service in the area. Please call me if you have any questions Sincerely, reel Richard H H ittet Manager •.d Cot:nt"/ ft Ilil Weld County Referral O February 22, 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Town of Milliken Case Number Ordinance 215 - Milliken IGA Please Reply By March 3, 2000 Planner -Anne Best Johnson — —_ Project An Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Milliken and 1Neld County Legal See attached map. —_ Location Please see attached map of area approximately 20 square miles. _— • Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date -nay be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) March 21, 2000 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive /an t ' We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Date Signature � M�-4 ('a h,/Tt/ - 3/3344.:2_Agency %-640,c/ (Y- /-,c(GJ2cT +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 +(970)353-61C0 ext.3540 +(970)`304-6493 fax EXHIBIT ANNE JOHNSON Planning Commission " •enda for 4-4-00 Small Change F tge 1 ; From: Trisha Swanson To: pcagenda Date: 3/29/00 10:28AM Subject: Planning Commission Agenda for 4-4-00 - Small Change The following agenda has the correct address as this planning commission will be held downtown at the Centennial Building in the Commissioner's Hearing Room at 915 10th St. Sorry for any inconvenience. Trisha rip t(it-- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES I PHONE (970) 35:3-6100, EXT.3E40 VI p FAX 970) 304-698 C. WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1555 N. 17TH AVENJE GREELEY, COLORADO 8W 31 COLORADO March 29, 2000 Mr. J.R. Schnelzer, Town of Milliken 11D1 Broad Street, Drawer 290 Milliken, Colorado 80543 Dear J.R.: Attached is an agenda for the April 4, 2000 Planning Commission hearing. Please note that although the Milliken IGA is third on the agenda, the first two items will be continued to a later date. As discussed previously, it will be a good idea for the representative from Milliken to come prepared to discuss the Town's public participation process in your recent comprehensive plar update. Planning Commission members may also ask about the public participation process in establishing the Town's IGA Urban Growth Boundary. Please feel free to contact me with further questions. Sincerely, 99� t Anne Best Johns n Long-Range Planner I R 6 7 W INTERGOVERNMENTAL R 6 6 W AGREEMENT MAP I VS G/..:,,S:::fA ,/J5 z.1-1-7 %/.fa////G/Gl///%i iii HIYY 34 MILLIKEN 16 17 16 '` ORDINANCE 217 VCR5e r-- c. j APPROVED 7-X-2000 19 20 21 2' 23 24 I 19 20 VCR54I 30 8 28 I 27 26 Il 25 I 30 6 27 I— n1 4 VCR52 — � �" 7— I 31 -2 3 35 136 1 31 2 .3 G IGA URBAN GROWTHWCR50 I- 1 - BOUNDARY q 2 FL N �m MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY k i Y yr - f Y 60 6 -9 J 7 10 VCR46 _p50N _ —I '. ' ' ' ' 5 14 t. 1 18 17 16 1 4,r �'' 3 17 18 15 7 f _ H1IY 256 eh �� 23 24 19 20 21R 2 19� I201...1.01 'a Il ( 1.O VCR42 T I r ' ` 4� 26 25 30 29 26 9 27 3i0 29 t li 26 7 _ _ - ; CREST VC \\� 35 36 31 I-32 33 __ 3 35 36 I 4 -32 33 I 34 L Vc 1 6 5 1 3 2 1 14 t3 MEr D _ _ + — I I— —_ —. MAP LEGEND 1Iwc 12 7 6 1 x(11 12 6 I 9 10 �A\\V\ ` .- 1 1'v^ k I —I _� I — Paved Road 4 it 11 .F n le ia \ 17 IC Gravel Ro8d l I 1 Crt i re I1 I WCR7 VCR II VCR'S 9 VCR 15I VCR f7 VCR 19 VCR2 f VCR23 VCR*VCR27 VCR29 VCR3 f Weld County Planning Dept. VISE M H AI). organ, CO. fa/!/ msuam 9-29-20001 22ufe14 RAD WELD COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFI .11E 6 PHONE: (970) 356-4000, EXT. a 19I (AO 4 l' Avg PHON]: (970t 336-7- 35 FAX: (970) 352-Q. 42 915 "IENTH STRF �T Wile C P.O. DOBO 0 48 Q May 2, 2000 GREELEY, COLORADO 80r 32 COLORADO J.R. Schnelzer, Administrator Town of Milliken 1101 Broad Street, P.O. Box 290 Milliken, CO 80543 FAX: (970) 587-2678 RE: Coordinated Planning Agreement Dear Mr. Schnelzer: Enclosed is the form of the Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and t le Town of Milliken. As we discussed this morning, the Board of County Commissioners has been discussing for the Towns of Kersey and Mead an additional sentence in Section 3.3(a) regarding a time limit for the municipalities to consider or complete an annexation. The language proposed thus far is highlighted in grey. Also highlighted is a new Section 6.5 which addresses the proposed agreement with respect to the planning of the area one mile on either side of 1 [ighway 34, west of the City of Greeley. It is my understanding that you intend to attend the Board of County Commissioners meeting tomorrow morning. I will look forward to seeing you then. Please feel free to call me at(970) 356-4000, Extension 4390, if you should have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed. Sincerely, „Bruce T. Barker Weld County Attorney's Office Enclosures pc: Clerk to the Board Monica Mika 4. EXHIBIT �37 WO0MS ik......._c) _ I III II\ I ) \ I R 115 ! Ir----- i_ , _ , 31 32 ••� 33 o 36 11 32 I33 31 i �T5N - cA a " NORTH JOHNSTOWN N J 6 4 a �,: �' 5 (-Yr- b L R, $4d !II♦■■��l =r 1 ---— _ _Wefteiiii�«112► s f ‘4� J ......./.. RR. L I _ .. i� 1 7 Cr 8 ,_ I,.. 9 U /2 ! - 1 I I:1 4„ 4 r q `4b e ' /2,: _ i ,O 1 t t° 18 17 i: 16 :2'2-\ -,i Y NORTH i 0/ p O44 I 4 4'44 W E 4 I 20 PI 19 - S - WC R 04 R'67W R66W 3000" 1500' 0 1500' 3000' 6000' 4 4" SCALE: 1 = 3000' 29 28 26 a LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT wr.R #40 WATERLINE LOCATION MAP Hello