HomeMy WebLinkAbout20003295 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by Jack Epple that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning
Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for:
CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 2XX
APPLICANT: City of Fort Lupton /Weld County
PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson
REQUEST: Intergovernmental Agreement.
be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons:
Since 1995, Weld County has been working with communities in establishing Intergovernmental
Agreements. For your consideration, the Fort Lupton and Weld County agreement has been prepared. It
is the Planning Commission's recommendation that this Intergovernmental Agreement meets the intent of
the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as follows:
1. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 1 states that Weld County will encourage and assist each
municipality in establishing an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement. The following
UGB.Policy 1 states, Weld County recognizes that municipalities can and should plan their own
futures in terms of the nature and rate of growth.
The City of Fort Lupton has worked with Weld County in establishing this proposed Intergovernmental
Agreement and indicated their interest in planning for responsible growth.(Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1).
2. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 2 and UGB.Policy 2 indicate that Urban development shall be
concentrated in or adjacent to urban growth boundary areas that provide an official designation
between future urban and non-urban uses. These boundaries shall be established through an
intergovernmental agreement between the municipality and the County.
The City of Fort Lupton has delineated their Urban Growth Boundary on the attached map. Through this
Intergovernmental Agreement, the City of Fort Lupton has specified the future growth of their community.
Further, it is noted that Weld County recognizes that it is appropriate for its municipalities to plan for growth
at their current boundaries and in the surrounding areas. (Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1).
3. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 3 states that the County and municipalities should coordinate land
use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and standards,
zoning, street and highway construction, open space, public infrastructure and other matters
affecting orderly development.
The county recognizes that an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is by far the best tool
for coordinating development for municipal/county interface. (Page 3-1, Comprehensive Plan.) It is further
noted that the County Commissioners imparted the following criteria to guide the municipalities in developing
their urban growth boundaries. These guidelines are the impetus for many communities in establishing an
Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County:
1. Growth should pay for itself in terms of initial costs, and in the long range, through good
design and functional efficiency.
2. Annexation patterns should directly correlate with municipal service areas.
2000-3295
RESOLUTION, Town of Fort Lupton/Weld County IGA
Page 2
3. Infill of communities is a far more efficient use of land than urban sprawl.
As outlined on pages 3-1 and 3-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the county recognizes that when growth at
the municipal/county level is not coordinated, problems arise. Additionally, when a municipality and the
County enter into an Urban Growth Boundary agreement, the County agrees to abide by the municipality's
vision for future development in the area. Likewise, the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to the
defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services. It is understood that urban growth is an ongoing
process and Urban Growth Boundary agreements will be subject to revision as needed.
4. The county recognizes that through intergovernmental agreements the municipality agrees to limit
its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services, therefore,
participating in responsible growth.
It is this belief that Weld County and the City of Fort Lupton desire to enter into this Intergovernmental
Agreement.
The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Fort Lupton and Weld County is to
establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination in
the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas surrounding each
municipality. The community of Fort Lupton exercises governmental authority over the same matter within
its boundaries; including annexations.
The premise for this Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the nine previous
agreements this board has approved. Customized modifications include the following:
1. Section 3.3 (e) The last sentence was modified to include, "and will consider identifiable impacts
on the MUNICIPAL road system resulting from such Development on the same
basis as in-COUNTY impacts."
2. Section 3.3(i) This is a new section to include reference to the storm water detention facilities and
subdivision design.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the
applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities.
Motion seconded by Stephen Mokray.
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage Absent
Cristie Nickles Cathy Clamp Fred Walker
John Folsom Arlan Marrs
Bryant Gimlin Michael Miller
Jack Epple
Stephen Mokray
RESOLUTION, Town of Fort Lupton/Weld County IGA
Page 3
The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this
case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I, Trisha Swanson, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld
County, Colorado, adopted on September 19' , 2000.
Dated the 19th of September, 2000.
Trisha Swanson
Secretary
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
September 19, 2000
Page 4
CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 2XX
APPLICANT: City of Fort Lupton /Weld County
PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson
REQUEST: Intergovernmental Agreement
Anne BestJohnson,Long Range Planner,presented the Fort Lupton Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA)and
noted that there are two changes from previous IGA's concerning impacts to county roads and infrastructure
as well as storm water detention facilities. Anne noted that the Department of Planning Services is
recommending approval of this IGA.
Paul Rayl, Planner for the City of Fort Lupton, stated that the City of Fort Lupton based their Urban Growth
Boundary (UGB) on their 2020 study and plan. Mr. Rayl noted that there were public hearings and citizen
input for this study. Mr. Rayl also noted that they UGB marks the line where the city could feasibly provide
services. Paul Rayl stated that the plan was adopted at a public hearing in July of this year.
Arlan Marrs asked about the open space involved in the layout. Mr. Rayl explained that the plan identified
three separate time frames for annexation in order to have a smoother progression of services, but that they
would be able to provide services to anyone within the UGB. Arlan Marrs asked about agricultural lands being
allowed to annex. Mr. Rayl noted that they did not plan to annex these lands, but that they were within the
proposed UGB. Bryant Gimlin asked how these meetings were advertised. Paul Rayl noted that there were
articles in the local paper as well as the local cable access station. John Folsom asked if the water and sewer
could serve everyone within the area or even beyond into Aristocrat. Mr. Rayl noted that they could serve
everyone within the UGB,but that bringing sewer and especially water beyond these lines could be a problem.
John Folsom asked what determination the City of Fort Lupton uses to define contiguity. Mr. Rayl noted they
use the State's definition. Michael Miller noted he would prefer this plan gave anyone within the area the right
to annex in if they were going to lose some property rights by being inside the UGB.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Glenn Teets of Roggen noted that he is concerned with the growth, especially in southeast Weld County as
there will not be enough water to support all the growth that is being approved.
Cathy Clamp asked Mr. Rayl if the City of Fort Lupton would be able to bring in the water without the help of
Hudson, in case the deal that is currently being worked on fell through. Paul Rayl noted that the City of Fort
Lupton will be able to bring in the water even without Hudson, if the need arose.
Arlan Marrs commented that before this meeting he would have voted in favor of this application as the UGB
was conservative and seemed realistic, but after seeing the possibility of agricultural land not being allowed
to annex and the open space plans, he is concerned.
Michael Miller noted that the City of Fort Lupton did present a conservative UGB, but would like to see the
surrounding property owners outside of the city notified by mail. Mr. Miller noted that he would be upset if his
right to develop was taken from him without being allowed to have a voice about it.
Jack Epple moved that the Fort Lupton IGA be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the
Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephen Mokray seconded the motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. John
Folsom,yes; Arlan Marrs,no; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, no;Jack Epple,yes; Bryant Gimlin,yes;
Cathy Clamp, no; Cristie Nicklas, yes. Motion carried.
CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 2XX
APPLICANT: Town of LaSalle/Weld County
PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson
REQUEST: Intergovernmental Agreement.
INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant City of Fort Lupton & Weld County Case Number Ordinance 2XX
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to At Hearing
Hearing
1 Staff Comments (2 pages) X
2 Notice of Public Hearing/Press Release X
3 Coordinated Planning Agreement, Application (7 pages) X
4 Referral List and letter to applicant (3 pages) X
5 Weld County Public Works, referral received 9/7/2000 X
6 Letter to Mayor Jensen from Weld County Planning dated X
8/31/2000
7 Map prepared by Weld County Planning X
8 Overhead of changes to language in Ordinance X
9 Affidavit of Publication X
10 X
Item submitted at planning commission
I hereby certify that the 9 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at
or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to
the Clerk to the Board's office. litafif Anne Best Johnson
Long Range Planner
6(t47, MEMORANDUM
wineTO: Wld County F OMeAnne Best lanningohnsonCLong omm(ssion Range Planner ESeptember 5, 2000
COLORADO
SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Agreement for Fort Lupto
Since 1995, Weld County has been working with communities in establishing Intergovernmental
Agreements. For your consideration, the Fort Lupton and Weld County agreement has been
prepared. It is the Department of Planning Services recommendation that this Intergovernmental
Agreement meets the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as follows:
1. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 1 states that Weld County will encourage and assist each
municipality in establishing an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement. The following
UGB.Policy 1 states, Weld County recognizes that municipalities can and should plan their own
futures in terms of the nature and rate of growth.
The City of Fort Lupton has worked with Weld County in establishing this proposed
Intergovernmental Agreement and indicated their interest in planning for responsible growth.
(Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1).
2. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 2 and UGB.Policy 2 indicate that Urban development shall
be concentrated in or adjacent to urban growth boundary areas that provide an official designation
between future urban and non-urban uses. These boundaries shall be established through an
intergovernmental agreement between the municipality and the County.
The City of Fort Lupton has delineated their Urban Growth Boundary on the attached map.
Through this Intergovernmental Agreement,the City of Fort Lupton has specified the future growth
of their community. Further, it is noted that Weld County recognizes that it is appropriate for its
municipalities to plan for growth at their current boundaries and in the surrounding areas.
(Comprehensive Plan, page 3-1).
3. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 3 states that the County and municipalities should coordinate
land use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and standards,
zoning, street and highway construction, open space, public infrastructure and other matters
affecting orderly development.
The county recognizes that an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is by far the
best tool for coordinating development for municipal/county interface. (Page 3-1, Comprehensive
Plan.) It is further noted that the County Commissioners imparted the following criteria to guide the
municipalities in developing their urban growth boundaries. These guidelines are the impetus for
many communities in establishing an Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County:
1. Growth should pay for itself in terms of initial costs, and in the long range, through good
design and functional efficiency.
2. Annexation patterns should directly correlate with municipal service areas.
3. Infill of communities is a far more efficient use of land than urban sprawl.
SERVICE.TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY.QUALITY
As outlined on pages 3-1 and 3-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the county recognizes that when
growth at the municipal/county level is not coordinated, problems arise. Additionally, when a
municipality and the County enter into an Urban Growth Boundary agreement, the County agrees
to abide by the municipality's vision for future development in the area. Likewise, the municipality
agrees to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services. It
is understood that urban growth is an ongoing process and Urban Growth Boundary agreements
will be subject to revision as needed.
4. The county recognizes that through intergovernmental agreements the municipality agrees
to limit its expansion to the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services, therefore,
participating in responsible growth.
It is this belief that Weld County and the City of Fort Lupton desire to enter into this
Intergovernmental Agreement.
The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Fort Lupton and Weld
County is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward
greater coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within
unincorporated areas surrounding each municipality. The community of Fort Lupton exercises
governmental authority over the same matter within its boundaries; including annexations.
The premise for this Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the nine previous
agreements this board has approved. Customized modifications include the following:
1. Section 3.3 (e) The last sentence was modified to include, "and will consider identifiable
impacts on the MUNICIPAL road system resulting from such Development
on the same basis as in-COUNTY impacts."
2. Section 3.3 (i) This is a new section to include reference to the storm water detention
facilities and subdivision design.
It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff and at the direction of the County
Attorney that this Intergovernmental Agreement be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with favorable recommendation.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the
applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities.
SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY
The premise for this Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the nine previous agreements this
board has approved. Customized modifications include the following:
1. Section 3.3 (e) The last sentence was modified to include, "and will consider identifiable impacts on the
MUNICIPAL road system resulting from such Development on the same basis as in-COUNTY
impacts."
2. Section 3.3 (i) This is a new section to include reference to the storm water detention facilities and subdivision
design.
Kit ci(Lese
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540
FAX (970)304-6498
1555 N. 17TH AVENUE
C. GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
COLORADO
August 31, 2000
The Honorable Phil Jensen
City of Fort Lupton
130 South McKinley
PO Box 148
Fort Lupton Colorado 80621
RE: IGA with Weld County
Dear Mayor Jensen:
The process of establishing an Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County includes four-hearings. The
first hearing is established for the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 19 at 1:30 p.m. This
hearing shall occur in the second floor hearing room of the Planning Department,located at 1555 North 17th
Avenue in Greeley. The next three hearings are in front of the Board of County Commissioners and shall
occur at 9:00 a.m. on October 9, October 23, and November 6. The Board of County Commissioner's
hearing room is located at 915 101h Street in Greeley. Please note the Board of County Commissioner
hearing dates are tentative and shall be permanently established after the Planning Commission hearing.
A representative from your community should attend each hearing and be prepared to discuss how the
Urban Growth Boundary was established. Please feel free to contact me with further questions regarding
these four hearings.
Weld County is in the process of codifying all County Ordinances into one document to be titled the Weld
County Code. The County Code will include all Intergovernmental Agreements. The process of reproducing
maps has been brought to the attention of the Department of Planning Services. In our Intergovernmental
Agreement with your community, a color map was submitted with the signed originals of the
Intergovernmental Agreement. Due to the expense of reproducing color maps in the County Code, we
would like to modify this color map into a black and white map for the County Code. Please refer to the
enclosed map for accuracy and notify me of any necessary modifications.
I look forward to working with your community in establishing this Intergovernmental Agreement.
Respectfully,
Anne Best Johnson
Long Range Planner
electronic copy: B. Barker, M. Daniels Mika
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
Kit (;;N:1
WliD
�. PHONE (970)353-6100, E4.6498
FAX (9(970) 3004-6498
1555 N. 17TH AVENUE
COLORADO GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
August 30, 2000
City of Fort Lupton
PO Box 148
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
Subject: Ordinance 2XX- Request for an Intergovernmental Agreement.
Dear Applicant:
Your application and related materials for the request described above are being processed. I have scheduled
a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for September 19, 2000, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting
will take place in Room 210, Weld County Planning Department, 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado.
It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning
Commission members may have.
The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the
Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four(24)hours before the
scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services'office
before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call.
Respectfully,
Anne Best Johnson
Long Range Planner
CITY OF FORT LUPTON 1\ FORT_left,
CITY COUNCIL tR m
Phil Jensen,Mayor
Cot 0RR00
Ken Clark,Ward 3 John Newton,Ward 3
David Norcross,Ward 2 Gary Milzel,Ward 2 Performance,Integrity,Teamwork,
Wardl Jimmy Dominguez.Ward 1 Accountability and Service
AM 2000- 095
APPROVE RESOLUTION 2000-034 ADOPTING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
WELD COUNTY REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH ISSUES
I. Agenda Date: Council Workshop—August 2, 2000
Council Meeting - August 9, 2000
II. Attachments: a. Intergovernmental Agreement with Exhibits
b. Resolution 2000-034
b. Planning Commission Resolution P2000-007
III. Summary Statement:
The Weld County Commissioners have been in the process of adopting Intergovernmental
Agreements with each municipality in Weld County. Agreements have already been adopted by
several communities in south Weld County including Platteville, Dacono, Frederick and
Firestone. The City of Fort Lupton and Weld County have drafted an Intergovernmental
Agreement that addresses the needs and concerns of both Fort Lupton and Weld County in
directing future growth patterns in the County. This Intergovernmental Agreement allows Fort
Lupton the opportunity to manage growth within its Urban Growth Boundary and provides for
cooperation between Fort Lupton and Weld County.
IV. Fiscal Note: qt
Finance Department Use Only —X--30
Finance Director
V. Submitted by: pez`'"e_ K
City Planner
VI. Approved for Presentation:
City Administrator
£ t } Y 3 k c d,u ,�. {, E
c�lil G2�'tl� ��o�t,af` .0ilp°�ri�va� s '` � �
1
REFERRAL LIST
NAME: City of Fort Lupton/Weld County CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 2XX
REFERRALS SENT: August 30,2000 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: September 15,2000
COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES
_X Attorney Ault
_X Health Department Brighton
Extension Service Broomfield
Emergency Management Office Dacono
Sheriffs Office Eaton
_X Public Works Erie
Housing Authority Evans
Airport Authority _Firestone
Building Inspection Fort Lupton
Code Enforcement Frederick
STATE Garden City
Division of Water Resources Gilcrest
Geological Survey Greeley
Department of Health Grover
Department of Transportation Hudson
Historical Society Johnstown
Water Conservation Board Keenesburg
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey
Division of Wildlife: LaSalle
Loveland Lochbuie
Greeley Longmont
Division of Minerals/Geology Mead
FIRE DISTRICTS Milliken
Ault F-1 New Raymer
Berthoud F-2 Northglenn
Briggsdale F-24 Nunn
Brighton F-3 Pierce
Eaton F-4 Platteville
X Fort Lupton F-5 _Severance
Galeton F-6 Thornton
Hudson F-7 Windsor
Johnstown F-8
La Salle F-9
Mountain View F-10 COUNTIES
Milliken F-11 Adams
Nunn F-12 Boulder
Pawnee F-22 Larimer
Platteville F-13
Platte Valley F-14 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Poudre Valley F-15 US Army Corps of Engineers
Raymer F-2 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service
Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Aviation Administration
Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Communication Commission
Wiggins F-18
Union Colony F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Brighton
OTHER Fort Collins
_X_School District RE-8 Greeley
_2X_Ditch Companies: Lupton Brighton Ditch, Platteville _X Platte Valley
_X Union Pacific Railroad West Adams
COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER
_X Jack Epple
RECEIVED
Weld County Planning Dept.
r�
SEP 12000
SEP 07 2000 WELD COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
4$61 (p\te\ -SCEIVED
Weld County Referral
IlID
August 30, 2000
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant City of Fort Upton /Weld Case Number Ordinance 2XX
County
Please Reply By September 15, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson
Project Intergovernmental Agreement.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation
you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that
we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date
may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further
questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) September 19, 2000
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature jll _,.// 0°-114 Date q_ •
t _0�y
Agency i - �. t1-,
+Weld County Planning Dept. •:1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 C-(970)304-6498 fax
CAROL Harding - Re Fwd: IGA Public Notices _. Page 1
From: Anne Johnson
To: Harding, CAROL
Date: 8/31/00 9:00AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: IGA Public Notices
Sure. Can I tell the towns that these dates are tentative?
>>> CAROL Harding 08/31/00 08:58AM >>>
Don't give the towns the list, until we have them formally scheduled. Can you just tell them the schedule
will be forthcoming? Thanks.
>>>Anne Johnson 08/31/00 08:36AM >>>
If Bruce and Mike don't seem concerned with the hearing dates as follows, I am the last to have any
concerns. I'll write the towns with the following schedule:
BOCC First Reading on October 9th with publication October 12th
BOCC Second Reading on October 23rd with publication October 26th
BOCC Third Reading on November 6th (one day prior to election)with publication November 9th and
Effective date of November 14th.
In an effort to reduce headaches for Esther and Kim, let's just stick to this schedule. Thanks for getting
back to me so soon.
>>> CAROL Harding 08/30/00 05:OOPM >>>
Hi, Anne.
After reading your suggested schedule, I talked to Mike and then he & I talked to Bruce. Bruce feels if we
have had at least one reading of the Ordinance, it is sufficient to show intent and is, therefore, not
absolutely necessary to have all three readings prior to election day. The problem arises because we
cannot pre-advertise an Ordinance, since Ordinances are to be published AFTER each reading, per
Charter requirements,with a ten-day time limit after publication before the next reading can be held.
Additionally, I will be on vacation 9/18 thru 9/29, so Esther and Kim will be trying to complete all the
paperwork, etc.
Having said all that, when I put the pencil to the calendar, and by streamlining all the publication dates. it
looks like we can meet the following schedule. When I return on October 2, I will prepare all of the IGA's
for first reading on October 9th with publication October 12th; 2nd reading October 23rd with publication
October 26th; 3rd reading November 6th (one day prior to election)with publication November 9th and
Effective date of November 14th.
I might point out the only reason we can streamline the schedule on three readings of an Ordinance is that
with these being IGA's which have already been approved by the municipalities, there is very little chance
of changes being made to them during one of the readings. Any change during one of the readings would
change the remaining schedule because of publication deadlines.
If time allows during 9/18 through 9/29, Esther or Kim will prepare the Ordinances for an earlier first
reading, which will change the entire schedule.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
>>>Anne Johnson 08/30/00 09:OSAM >>>
Good morning, Carol.
The Weld County Commissioners would like to enter into an Ingergovernemntal Agreement (IGA)with the
communities of Fort Lupton and LaSalle. Commissioner Mike Geile mentioned to Monica that he would
I CAROL Harding - Re. Fwd: IGA Public Notices Page 2
r uw . ..
like to have these two IGAs approved before the November 7 election. Yesterday afternoon, Bruce,
Monica and I met to discuss the time frame for the four hearings. It was determined we will need to
pre-advertise these hearings to have them final prior the November election. The following time-frame is
what we determined necessary. Please advise if this is not a correct sequence of events.
Planning Commission hearing: September 19
Board of County Commissioners first hearing: September 25
Board of County Commissioners second hearing: October 18
Board of County Commissioners third hearing: October 23
In effect: October 31
We need to have the Clerk to the Board pre-advertise these hearings and schedule them for the BOCC
agenda. The attached Public Notice is for your use in advertising the three BOCC hearings. Cut and
paste as necessary for your use.
Can you help us out?
Kit io:s3,-****•.;
Weld County Referral
IlllID
August 30, 2000
C
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant City of Fort Lupton /Weld Case Number Ordinance 2XX
County
tl
Please Reply By September 15, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson
Project Intergovernmental Agreement.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation
you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that
we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date
may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further
questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) September 19, 2000
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
yQ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature b c-6_)Th..cilio 1.oK Date yaLve crI
Agency (A) f a P if f ��JJ
•:•Weld County Planning Dept. •)1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax
Weld County P14nning Dept,
EXHIBIT
7.EX -
2000
1(s-____ . RECEIVED
1 i Imo,
Weld County planning Dept
SE 75 2000
itott
VS5 1 guDnty Referral
III
August 30, 2000
C. z __
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant City of Fort Lupton /Weld Case Number Ordinance 2XX
County
Please Reply By September 15, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson
Project Intergovernmental Agreement.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation
you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that
we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date
may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further
questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) September 19, 2000
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
)1 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature It)" 6 / '// ,y�/ Date cy /S c/ /O !'
Agency yhaV/,G�'. C, lei)
+rWeld County Planning Dept. :•1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO. 80631 •:•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax
2 EXHIBIT
�y64
Weld County Planning Dep
SEP 19 2000
iit RECEIVED
Weld County Referral
August 30, 2000
VI ip C - _
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
i
Applicant City of Fort Lupton /Weld Case Number Ordinance 2XX
County
Please Reply By September 15, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson I
Project Intergovernmental Agreement.
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation
you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that
we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date
may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further
questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) September 19, 2000
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
` ≥C We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature (
�, " fir , ,,- /9,O Date 9_/ ..6 C9
Agency if &S4' - Pilln {
:-Weld County Planning Dept. :•1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 •.(970)304-6498 fax
4. EXHIBIT
Hello