HomeMy WebLinkAbout20001230.tiff Interoffice Memo
y�BRtP
' R To: Mr Gerald Moore �,ic��
o cool -���CCC
�ocoy =j From: Rick Dill, Sheriffs Administrator
Date: February 2, 2000
Re: Grievance Dated 01/28/2000
I've researched your grievance regarding co-payment. I do not support your claim. The charge
should stand as was collected.
There will be no further action on your grievance.
cc: Inmate Booking File
North Jail R& I Board
Centennial Jail R &I Board
x000 -- /_;)3C)
CRSA § 17-26-104.5, Medical visits--charge to persons in custody Page l
*31208 C.R.S.A. § 17-26-104.5 process, an annual physical examination, any
visit to a physician, dentist, or optometrist that
WEST'S COLORADO REVISED results from a referral by a nurse, physician's
STATUTES ANNOTATED assistant, or physician, or any emergency
TITLE 17. CORRECTIONS treatment or follow-up visit initiated by a
CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES medical professional. In no case shall a person's
AND PROGRAMS inability to pay be the basis for not providing
FACILITIES treatment by any medical personnel. Any
medical treatment charge that remains unpaid
ARTICLE 26. JAILS shall constitute a cost of care that the person
PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS may be ordered to pay pursuant to section
16-11-501, C.R.S., and that may be collected by
Current through End of 1999 1st Reg. Sess. the county pursuant to the provisions of section
16-11-101.6, C.R.S.
§ 17-26-104.5. Medical visits--charge to
persons in custody (2) The provisions of this section shall apply
to any person held in custody in a county jail
regardless of whether the person is a juvenile, is
(1) A county jail may assess a medical
being held prior to trial, or is in custody for
treatment charge against any person who conviction under a state statute or a county_ or
receives while being held in custody medical municipal ordinance.
treatment performed by a physician, dentist,
nurse, or licensed hospital or as a result of a sick CREDIT(S)
call or for whom a prescription is filled. The
county jail may assess any such medical 1998 Main Volume
treatment charge against the person's jail
account. In addition, the county jail may assess Added by Laws 1997,11.8.97-1115j 1, of. April I. 1997.
a reasonable medical treatment charge for each
visit by a person in custody to an institutional or REFERENCES
noninstitutional physician, dentist, or CROSS REFERENCES
optometrist; except that a medical treatment
charge shall not be assessed for any visit Persons in custody, medical treatment, assessment of
required by the county jail during the intake charges,see § 16-3-401.
Copyright (c) West Group 2000 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works
CORRESPONDENCE RESPONSE
DEWARtMENT{ -._ _ _ .'_ c://
* * * PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN THREE DAYS.* *
IF RESPONSE WILL BE DELAYED,
PLEASE NOTIFY "CTB GROUP" BY E-MAIL
OF EXPECTED DATE FOR RESPONSE.
RECOMMENDED AC'11ON
Narrative:
�iG?llY ilb 5 L ip <', i I L/ ZG�d I C " °C L2_`'',C4 (Le
,
f �I L �u`rL?ElCtil cVic, knr-
MET L OD O RES?ONSI&
Board Action
Work Session
Letter (Attached) het
,e /�Q v-etc
Telephone Call
No Response (explain) /
\" i.
G / Department ad Signature
GB DH GV BK MG
BOARD ACTION: (Initial by Approval)
Agree with Recommendation '/ V = /
Worksession
`-/��/ t ? 2000- !i'30
ti;1 t �... _ • , 1 • t•1
7-,..._.:` t .•G.•_' is�..Yk-.)--;t'I-4, ,/, cu.,C-� I't••" (A.. - ,
(/— i -..../.........! _1•..i: &i.,.--,....i'.,, .. C+- ; ,..rro''•).4.:...1,,A4,:,;.....:....-,,, t.•'.- 1i• �'.L..,1�. (' . ._ _.. • -,? ' .'
n .. � c- • .
e • y, ' . ...•'- '.. (. T).. . f i ,,i —is ...-1. .1 ,4 . . .., . - i -- 1,, ,-.: t_ .,,,,
_..___J_• rt...-. -1 .r,'-r j IC.
C.
).-• i .. .7_'''';' 1 '1, ii \ •:! . II
' rr r /• .c
V �.. CL -, 4,v11: i,4' ;.pro,-.2 . ,_ (>-' `•...G5. ',6:. (.....;'.:i.../$ (f,�; ;r_ _ •`'
r r / 1) (\ 1 t, '
_ Cu . 1 . } , ' .I• , • u ,
• •l
.\/ .•, ....,c,• 1-•-(:, 1. 'ice- • e•' L ,,,24;—,•-t . ... i' .C`; ..1-
/...1 ,
(: 1
, . .e. - 1— - - ..,•,.•C. I t .,l- ...� �.••` •1 ,.e i '...4".24/...-.:„ '.... s.• � k f I, I +
ff
�,t`..• Z.--r. : l.._ 454-t••••..\...0„` \.1 G„_7 /• 1 \ (.`L .�n•44•• l'I f ' l' `r4 -1:.• ./: •.ri .
`
iriV\ ‘,.i),"6-'.I j,,1--r'1 �' (�•1 •Z,•;'t :.L. +\..;L'‘.�)
" / y f + ti i p r
A .i `...C.-Ci,1_37 r .il'�f',J t•\, ..•t 7 _ L L• „.,.:ri- W 4'`,-...\ ..t.,,�/ Lt'%-1-..14.‘,...,\. / ,) 1 . .." •L�.•) A C:._ (�✓',4�.: .Y. i L.- , j v1 y;
1
-'
a e r. i,, I t
r /1 `` N,
'4vJ
r
I..1 • ( ) r.1 i ` '
;'�, .
-/ rte,/ i
t +' / ,...4,,,.....•! n ly `y`'L1 j 7 li
NAME: L.)14,10,12.4 / 1 ten POD: 1..„ FACILITY: DATE: r r c7i'[ r uV
I
DELIVER TO:
( ) ON-DUTY MANAGER ( ) FOOD SERVICE ( ) OTHER
( ) PROGRAMS ( ) COMMISSARY G VANCE
( }MEDICAL ( } CHAPLIN (VSTEP I
( ) PHONE SERVICE ( ) COURTS ( ) STEP 2
— ( ) STEP 3
:; ..,,,s.,.„..„... su _ REASON FOR REQUEST: eCA— 1:11 &ASA IC;Lc 'I ye+ y7,.i .1 i•...1 t. IN CAtit. _
1 Oo.*or 9- 1;TIC j ,i n' t, ;a $�c5 Prr
l T) ', 4 s P,.r _1,7K--- \near" b r i{....4,) kattp
v,o rvvz � ��i �. �� �) r✓�I
sr.,
i,• 4
I INMATE'S SIGNATURE: DATE:
I REPLY:
CfoW CULL) -6 h- 2) m, . a / t Zte
_. ist,Lt. C-a- ,e/li ,Zie--t 4071°) V‘de-l- 1,411-1,7,/a-}S
.,v ` , ,,,,,,,,,---c..--.. - ice:.f,
pdi';':---4"-----'4`.•- -4¢ F• •
. _3' SIQsNATURE: - DATE. TIME: ;""
GRIEVANCE RESPONSE
012700
Mr. Moore,
In response to your grievance concerning the refund of$8.00 for a doctor visit, you will not be
refunded this money because this visit was not a follow-up of the first visit. A follow-up is:
1)scheduled by the doctor at the time of the first visit, or;
2)scheduled by the nurse after an assessment reveals that there has been no improvement since
the first visit.
On 12-08-99 you were assessed by the nurse. At that time, she found you to have a cough and an
elevated temperature so you were referred to the doctor at no charge to you. You were seen in
clinic the next day(12-09-99) and were diagnosed with possible bronchitis at that time. You
were prescribed antibiotics for ten days.
On 12-17-99 you were seen in clinic by the PA. for a complete physical exam. He examined you
and found no evidence of infection. At that time, you stated that you were "feeling much better'.
No further medications or treatments were indicated or prescribed. This visit was also at no
charge to you.
On 12-22-99 you submitted a kite requesting to see the doctor. You were seen in clinic on
12-23-99 and appropriately charged $8.00. This was not a follow-up of the first visit because:
1) This visit was not initiated by the doctor, P.A., or the nurse
2) You already had follow-up with the P.A. less than one week earlier, and he found no
evidence of a continuation of the original problem.
3) Your exam on 12-23-99 by the doctor revealed no evidence of continuation of the
original problem.
WELD COUNTY SHERIFF ' S OFFICE
Ed Jordan, Sheriff
910 10TH Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
(303) 356-9015
FAX (303) 353-8551
To Rick Dill p ,q
From David Malcom d' ��
t
Date February 1, 2000
Subject: Grievance from Gerald Moore Dated 01282000
I have reviewed all documents submitted with Mr. Moore's grievance, talked with
Sherrie Wayman, and have looked through Mr. Moore's booking file. There was
nothing in Mr. Moore's booking file.
In talking to Ms. Wayman, she advised that the $8.00 co-pay charge should stand.
She advised that on 120899 Mr. Moore talked with a nurse about a medical problem.
After the nurse checked him out, he was scheduled for a doctor visit, and was not
charged a co-pay. This was on 120999. On 121799, Mr. Moore was seen by the PA
for a complete physical, and no further problems were noted from the doctor visit
on 120899. On 122299 Mr. Moore sent in a Inmate Request Form asking to see the
doctor, and was scheduled for 122399. When Mr. Moore was seen by the doctor on
122399 there was no evidence of any continuation of the original medical problem.
Ms. Wayman said that Mr. Moore did not talk with a nurse about any problems as
he did originally. If he had, and during the nurse's assessment, the nurse would
have found a problem Mr. Moore would have been scheduled to see the doctor, and
there would have been no co-pay.
I found no Inmate Request Form from Mr. Moore written in detail, stating follow-
up at no charge, other than the information that was included in the Step III
Grievance written on 01282000. I would have to agree with Ms. Wayman. If Mr.
Moore had talked with a nurse and had an assessment prior to writing the inmate
Request Form on 122299 to see the doctor, and if the nurse would have referred
him to the doctor there would have been no co-pay. Without going through the
nurse, and there being no evidence of the prior medical problem, then Mr. Moore
should be charged a co-pay.
WELD COUNTY JAIL
0 nir
INMATE REQUEST FORM '
Al'
I
�a ,
NAME: (L -A j t 0 POD: CD FACILITY: DATE: I f 1 /t(-
DE ER TO:
(r ON-DUTY MANAGER ( ) FOOD SERVICE ( ) OTHER
( }PROGRAMS ( ) COMMISSARY GRIEVANCE
( ) MEDICAL ( ) CHAPLIN ( ) STEP I
( ) PHONE SERVICE ( ) COURTS ( ) ST ..
_ ( TEP 3
REASON FOR REQUEST: r ,,
, /'1. Ar..6._.„ 4).0,7 icril 1.1,--k-1 tdp/P) ( AAA‘.TLC:7
5, „,t)-- a --c,P224 --k..9 .. 1
/ Y-2,0 C X ',_...�.D j t1 �O4-f.r..J Fpa•tt ` . 1 l f�j n �LT-ik
-r z9���-�Q. 0 tc , I� 'C '
- -,711C ..�
_ c-. / t;-r -.1
,L0 i 0 fit)t 1 . ., vA^ 4 ``x f` L i ce. .. 1. .i -I,, , c.e,�lr•4�
INMATE'S SI NATURE: ,, _�--
REPLY: V--5.,un ji ,
SIGNATURE: DATE: TIME: _
1NM00310599
Hello