Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20001230.tiff Interoffice Memo y�BRtP ' R To: Mr Gerald Moore �,ic�� o cool -���CCC �ocoy =j From: Rick Dill, Sheriffs Administrator Date: February 2, 2000 Re: Grievance Dated 01/28/2000 I've researched your grievance regarding co-payment. I do not support your claim. The charge should stand as was collected. There will be no further action on your grievance. cc: Inmate Booking File North Jail R& I Board Centennial Jail R &I Board x000 -- /_;)3C) CRSA § 17-26-104.5, Medical visits--charge to persons in custody Page l *31208 C.R.S.A. § 17-26-104.5 process, an annual physical examination, any visit to a physician, dentist, or optometrist that WEST'S COLORADO REVISED results from a referral by a nurse, physician's STATUTES ANNOTATED assistant, or physician, or any emergency TITLE 17. CORRECTIONS treatment or follow-up visit initiated by a CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES medical professional. In no case shall a person's AND PROGRAMS inability to pay be the basis for not providing FACILITIES treatment by any medical personnel. Any medical treatment charge that remains unpaid ARTICLE 26. JAILS shall constitute a cost of care that the person PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS may be ordered to pay pursuant to section 16-11-501, C.R.S., and that may be collected by Current through End of 1999 1st Reg. Sess. the county pursuant to the provisions of section 16-11-101.6, C.R.S. § 17-26-104.5. Medical visits--charge to persons in custody (2) The provisions of this section shall apply to any person held in custody in a county jail regardless of whether the person is a juvenile, is (1) A county jail may assess a medical being held prior to trial, or is in custody for treatment charge against any person who conviction under a state statute or a county_ or receives while being held in custody medical municipal ordinance. treatment performed by a physician, dentist, nurse, or licensed hospital or as a result of a sick CREDIT(S) call or for whom a prescription is filled. The county jail may assess any such medical 1998 Main Volume treatment charge against the person's jail account. In addition, the county jail may assess Added by Laws 1997,11.8.97-1115j 1, of. April I. 1997. a reasonable medical treatment charge for each visit by a person in custody to an institutional or REFERENCES noninstitutional physician, dentist, or CROSS REFERENCES optometrist; except that a medical treatment charge shall not be assessed for any visit Persons in custody, medical treatment, assessment of required by the county jail during the intake charges,see § 16-3-401. Copyright (c) West Group 2000 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works CORRESPONDENCE RESPONSE DEWARtMENT{ -._ _ _ .'_ c:// * * * PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN THREE DAYS.* * IF RESPONSE WILL BE DELAYED, PLEASE NOTIFY "CTB GROUP" BY E-MAIL OF EXPECTED DATE FOR RESPONSE. RECOMMENDED AC'11ON Narrative: �iG?llY ilb 5 L ip <', i I L/ ZG�d I C " °C L2_`'',C4 (Le , f �I L �u`rL?ElCtil cVic, knr- MET L OD O RES?ONSI& Board Action Work Session Letter (Attached) het ,e /�Q v-etc Telephone Call No Response (explain) / \" i. G / Department ad Signature GB DH GV BK MG BOARD ACTION: (Initial by Approval) Agree with Recommendation '/ V = / Worksession `-/��/ t ? 2000- !i'30 ti;1 t �... _ • , 1 • t•1 7-,..._.:` t .•G.•_' is�..Yk-.)--;t'I-4, ,/, cu.,C-� I't••" (A.. - , (/— i -..../.........! _1•..i: &i.,.--,....i'.,, .. C+- ; ,..rro''•).4.:...1,,A4,:,;.....:....-,,, t.•'.- 1i• �'.L..,1�. (' . ._ _.. • -,? ' .' n .. � c- • . e • y, ' . ...•'- '.. (. T).. . f i ,,i —is ...-1. .1 ,4 . . .., . - i -- 1,, ,-.: t_ .,,,, _..___J_• rt...-. -1 .r,'-r j IC. C. ).-• i .. .7_'''';' 1 '1, ii \ •:! . II ' rr r /• .c V �.. CL -, 4,v11: i,4' ;.pro,-.2 . ,_ (>-' `•...G5. ',6:. (.....;'.:i.../$ (f,�; ;r_ _ •`' r r / 1) (\ 1 t, ' _ Cu . 1 . } , ' .I• , • u , • •l .\/ .•, ....,c,• 1-•-(:, 1. 'ice- • e•' L ,,,24;—,•-t . ... i' .C`; ..1- /...1 , (: 1 , . .e. - 1— - - ..,•,.•C. I t .,l- ...� �.••` •1 ,.e i '...4".24/...-.:„ '.... s.• � k f I, I + ff �,t`..• Z.--r. : l.._ 454-t••••..\...0„` \.1 G„_7 /• 1 \ (.`L .�n•44•• l'I f ' l' `r4 -1:.• ./: •.ri . ` iriV\ ‘,.i),"6-'.I j,,1--r'1 �' (�•1 •Z,•;'t :.L. +\..;L'‘.�) " / y f + ti i p r A .i `...C.-Ci,1_37 r .il'�f',J t•\, ..•t 7 _ L L• „.,.:ri- W 4'`,-...\ ..t.,,�/ Lt'%-1-..14.‘,...,\. / ,) 1 . .." •L�.•) A C:._ (�✓',4�.: .Y. i L.- , j v1 y; 1 -' a e r. i,, I t r /1 `` N, '4vJ r I..1 • ( ) r.1 i ` ' ;'�, . -/ rte,/ i t +' / ,...4,,,.....•! n ly `y`'L1 j 7 li NAME: L.)14,10,12.4 / 1 ten POD: 1..„ FACILITY: DATE: r r c7i'[ r uV I DELIVER TO: ( ) ON-DUTY MANAGER ( ) FOOD SERVICE ( ) OTHER ( ) PROGRAMS ( ) COMMISSARY G VANCE ( }MEDICAL ( } CHAPLIN (VSTEP I ( ) PHONE SERVICE ( ) COURTS ( ) STEP 2 — ( ) STEP 3 :; ..,,,s.,.„..„... su _ REASON FOR REQUEST: eCA— 1:11 &ASA IC;Lc 'I ye+ y7,.i .1 i•...1 t. IN CAtit. _ 1 Oo.*or 9- 1;TIC j ,i n' t, ;a $�c5 Prr l T) ', 4 s P,.r _1,7K--- \near" b r i{....4,) kattp v,o rvvz � ��i �. �� �) r✓�I sr., i,• 4 I INMATE'S SIGNATURE: DATE: I REPLY: CfoW CULL) -6 h- 2) m, . a / t Zte _. ist,Lt. C-a- ,e/li ,Zie--t 4071°) V‘de-l- 1,411-1,7,/a-}S .,v ` , ,,,,,,,,,---c..--.. - ice:.f, pdi';':---4"-----'4`.•- -4¢ F• • . _3' SIQsNATURE: - DATE. TIME: ;"" GRIEVANCE RESPONSE 012700 Mr. Moore, In response to your grievance concerning the refund of$8.00 for a doctor visit, you will not be refunded this money because this visit was not a follow-up of the first visit. A follow-up is: 1)scheduled by the doctor at the time of the first visit, or; 2)scheduled by the nurse after an assessment reveals that there has been no improvement since the first visit. On 12-08-99 you were assessed by the nurse. At that time, she found you to have a cough and an elevated temperature so you were referred to the doctor at no charge to you. You were seen in clinic the next day(12-09-99) and were diagnosed with possible bronchitis at that time. You were prescribed antibiotics for ten days. On 12-17-99 you were seen in clinic by the PA. for a complete physical exam. He examined you and found no evidence of infection. At that time, you stated that you were "feeling much better'. No further medications or treatments were indicated or prescribed. This visit was also at no charge to you. On 12-22-99 you submitted a kite requesting to see the doctor. You were seen in clinic on 12-23-99 and appropriately charged $8.00. This was not a follow-up of the first visit because: 1) This visit was not initiated by the doctor, P.A., or the nurse 2) You already had follow-up with the P.A. less than one week earlier, and he found no evidence of a continuation of the original problem. 3) Your exam on 12-23-99 by the doctor revealed no evidence of continuation of the original problem. WELD COUNTY SHERIFF ' S OFFICE Ed Jordan, Sheriff 910 10TH Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 (303) 356-9015 FAX (303) 353-8551 To Rick Dill p ,q From David Malcom d' �� t Date February 1, 2000 Subject: Grievance from Gerald Moore Dated 01282000 I have reviewed all documents submitted with Mr. Moore's grievance, talked with Sherrie Wayman, and have looked through Mr. Moore's booking file. There was nothing in Mr. Moore's booking file. In talking to Ms. Wayman, she advised that the $8.00 co-pay charge should stand. She advised that on 120899 Mr. Moore talked with a nurse about a medical problem. After the nurse checked him out, he was scheduled for a doctor visit, and was not charged a co-pay. This was on 120999. On 121799, Mr. Moore was seen by the PA for a complete physical, and no further problems were noted from the doctor visit on 120899. On 122299 Mr. Moore sent in a Inmate Request Form asking to see the doctor, and was scheduled for 122399. When Mr. Moore was seen by the doctor on 122399 there was no evidence of any continuation of the original medical problem. Ms. Wayman said that Mr. Moore did not talk with a nurse about any problems as he did originally. If he had, and during the nurse's assessment, the nurse would have found a problem Mr. Moore would have been scheduled to see the doctor, and there would have been no co-pay. I found no Inmate Request Form from Mr. Moore written in detail, stating follow- up at no charge, other than the information that was included in the Step III Grievance written on 01282000. I would have to agree with Ms. Wayman. If Mr. Moore had talked with a nurse and had an assessment prior to writing the inmate Request Form on 122299 to see the doctor, and if the nurse would have referred him to the doctor there would have been no co-pay. Without going through the nurse, and there being no evidence of the prior medical problem, then Mr. Moore should be charged a co-pay. WELD COUNTY JAIL 0 nir INMATE REQUEST FORM ' Al' I �a , NAME: (L -A j t 0 POD: CD FACILITY: DATE: I f 1 /t(- DE ER TO: (r ON-DUTY MANAGER ( ) FOOD SERVICE ( ) OTHER ( }PROGRAMS ( ) COMMISSARY GRIEVANCE ( ) MEDICAL ( ) CHAPLIN ( ) STEP I ( ) PHONE SERVICE ( ) COURTS ( ) ST .. _ ( TEP 3 REASON FOR REQUEST: r ,, , /'1. Ar..6._.„ 4).0,7 icril 1.1,--k-1 tdp/P) ( AAA‘.TLC:7 5, „,t)-- a --c,P224 --k..9 .. 1 / Y-2,0 C X ',_...�.D j t1 �O4-f.r..J Fpa•tt ` . 1 l f�j n �LT-ik -r z9���-�Q. 0 tc , I� 'C ' - -,711C ..� _ c-. / t;-r -.1 ,L0 i 0 fit)t 1 . ., vA^ 4 ``x f` L i ce. .. 1. .i -I,, , c.e,�lr•4� INMATE'S SI NATURE: ,, _�-- REPLY: V--5.,un ji , SIGNATURE: DATE: TIME: _ 1NM00310599 Hello