The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20002302.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Arlan Marrs that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: Case Number: Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance 147, County Code 2000-1 and Mixed Use Development Plan, Ordinance 191, County Code 2000-1 Planner: Anne Best Johnson Applicant: Doug Tiefel, President Columbine Land Resources, Inc. Address: PO Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 Request: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development (MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include a 240-acre parcel into the Mixed Use Development area. This amendment necessitates additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follows:Comprehensive Plan Table 5,Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map, MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Legal Description: Located in a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 3E, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location: Located north of and adjacent to WCR 26, located adjacent to and west of WCR 13. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners as follows: Page 1-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, Item 2, Weld County Ordinance 147P: A. Comprehensive plan amendment proposals shall be considered bi-annually with a public hearing process beginning in November or May of each year. The application for Columbine Land Resources, Inc. was received May 1, 2000. The July 18, 2000 public hearing was established on June 1, 2000. B. The petitioner shall pay for the cost of legal publication of the proposed amendment and all land use application fees. There is no fee associated with amending the MUD Map. There are fees associated with publication and the applicant is aware of this fee. C. A typewritten original and eleven (11) copies of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be submitted to the Department of Planning Services no la:er than October 1 or April 1 of each year to be considered for review and public hearings. The application materials were received on May 3. (May 1, 2000 was a Saturday.) Additional materials were required from the applicant. Such materials were 'equired prior to establishing a hearing date. It is important to note that the reason for the hearing process delay was that the Department of Planning Services was waiting for a preliminary traffic impact study from R & M Land Company (the other applicant for inclusion into the MUD area). The Department of Planning Services made the decision to set the Planning Commission hearing date and not penalize Columbine Land Resources. To date,this study has not been provided. This study is required by the Department of Public Works to adequately make a referral on these requests, and shall be required prior to establishing a Board of County Commissioner hearing date. 2000-2302 RESOLUTION, Ordinance 147-Q and Ordinance 119-E Columbine Land Resources Page 2 The following items shall be submitted as part of the proposed amendment: (1) A statement describing why the comprehensive plan is in need of revision. The applicant wishes to be included in the MUD Area due to the fact that they wish to develop the property in the future and want to follow MUD standards for development. Page 1-2 of the Comprehensive Plan states,"Evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan is necessary to provide an accurate statement of county land-use goals and policies based on current data and the needs of Weld County citizens." The applicant wishes to develop their property following PUD and MUD standards. This goal can only be accomplished by this amendment procedure. (2) A statement describing how the proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies, and needs of the County. The applicant stated development shall be consistent with the MUD Plan. The applicant is proposing low density and the preservation of 77%of the land as open space. Comprehensive Plan C.Goal 4 states it is important to "Recognize the impact of new development on the natural environment and develop measures to mitigate these." Furthermore, O.Goal 6 states"Provision should be made for open space to meet human needs throughout the County in order to protect and enhance the quality of life and enjoyment of the environment." Both developments shall proceed through the PUD development process which allows flexibility in development. This flexibility shall require each landowner to develop in a consistent manner that will not detract from the future goals, policies, and needs of the County as outlined in the MUD Plan, Comprehensive Plan and PUD Ordinance. In the case of an amendment to the 1-25 MUD area Map the proposed amendment must A. Demonstrate the proposed amendment is adjacent to and contiguous with the existing 1-25 MUD Area Map. This application is adjacent to the existing MUD Map area, with 10% of the proposed amendment being is contiguous to the existing MUD area. B. Describe how the proposed amendment will not place a burden upon existing or planned service capabilities. This statement shall include how emergency services will be provided to the proposed area. The applicant has stated that all of the property can be served by public water and sewer service. Furthermore, the applicant noted that other utility providers are adjacent to Weld County Roads 13 and 26 and are available. Comprehensive Plan MUD.Goal 2 states,"To provide efficient and cost-effective delivery of adequate public facilities and services which assure the health safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County and the area.' This development shall proceed through the PUD process which requires the developer to indicate details of service provision. C. Delineate the number of people who will reside in the proposed area. This statement shall include the number of school-aged children and address the cultural and social service provision needs of the proposed population. The applicant has noted an estimated 116 residents may occJpy the proposed 40 residential lots. The residents shall have access to the recreational amenities provided by the large bodies of water on site. St.Vrain Valley School District, RE-1J has indicated,'Should this proposal be considered for approval, the District would requires the cooperation and participation of the developer and County in implementing a separate agreement to help mitigate the impacts on the schools." Weld County would pursue this issue with the School District. In addition to the amendment to Map 2.1,the proposed amendments described above necessitate ac ditional changes to reflect accurate land use. Such amendments are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Table 5 and the Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map. RESOLUTION, Ordinance 147-Q and Ordinance 119-E Columbine Land Resources Page 3 MUD Plan Section 1.1.3 Individuals may submit a proposal to amend the MUD Structural Plan in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 1-2 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. Any applicant submitting a proposal to amend the MUD Structural Land Use Map 2.1 shall also submit a deed or legal instrument to the Department of Planning Services identifying their interest in the property. The applicant submitted the proper documents outlined above. In addition to the amendment to Map 2.1,the proposed amendments described above necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use. Such amendments are as follows: MUD Plan Section 1.1.2,MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Motion seconded by Stephen Mokray. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Fred Walker Cristie Nicklas Arlan Marrs John Folsom Michael Miller Bryant Gimlin Jack Epple Stephen Mokray Cathy Clamp The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Trisha Swanson, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on July 18, 2000. Dated the 18'" of July, 2000. Trisha Swanson Secretary SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18,2000 Page 2 CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 147 and Ordinance 191 APPLICANT: Louis Rademacher and R & M Land Company and Columbine Land Resources PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson REQUEST: Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) and Mixed Use Development (MUD)Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1)an 80-acre parcel,and 2)an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate and use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table 5, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances include document-wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face. and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendrr one; include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right io f arm Covenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specific-, amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current boundaries and acreage and cross- reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1 1 in the Background Document: Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45-47 to reflect correct plan species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. LOCATION: Applicant#1)Located in the N2 NE4 of Section 36,Township 3 North.Range 68 We it c I the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2)Located a portion of the SW4 NW=.at d a I of the SE4 of Section 36,Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. Weld Co rimy, Colorado. Anne Best Johnson, Planner, presented the changes to Ordinance 147P and Ordinance 191E, nrdise the application for inclusion of one 80-acre parcel and one 240-acre parcel into the MUD District arid some changes to the two ordinances concerning maps and grammatical corrections. Anne presented the two applications for inclusion into the MUD separately, starting with the inclusion of the 80-acre parcel by R 3 M Company, under Louis Rademacher. The second application was presented for the 240-acre parcel by Columbine Land Company,under Doug Tiefel. Ms.Johnson noted that the Department of Planning Services had to delay setting the hearing date as they were waiting for a traffic impact study from Applicant#1,leg ding to set the date without this study because they did not want to penalize Applicant#2 and delay their any longer. Anne Best Johnson noted that the addition of these two parcels would necessitate changes to se'rera'l maps and tables in both the Comprehensive Plan and the MUD Plan. Staff comments recommender, Applicant#1 submit the required study prior to scheduling a Board of County Commissioners hearng. Anne presented the changes to Ordinance147P, including some grammatical changes, changes car cei nag the amendment years, amendment procedure, design standards, amendments at the recuest of F..blic Works, and changes to the Right to Farm Covenant. Cathy Clamp asked why the comment stating "Parents are responsible for their children," is being r()moved from the Right to Farm Covenant. Anne noted that when staff looked back at the creation of the Right to Farm Covenant, it was believed that this was just a comment made at the meeting and mistakenly added to the Ordinance. Bruce Barker noted that it has been included since the original ordinance was recorded C istie Nickles,who was a part of the committee that created the Right to Farm Covenant, noted that the coma-ittee wanted to include that statement in the Right to Farm Covenant. John Folsom asked why there is only one applicant listed on the agenda and the legal notification a id i! it is okay to continue. Bruce stated that since the legal descriptions for both properties are listed separates oil legal notice and agenda both are acceptable and it is alright to continue. John Folsom asked why the hearing process did not start in May as is required on pages 1-2 of the Comprehensive Plan. Anne noted that the applications were received in time, but the hearing date was delayed as Applicant#1 had not turned t-) the traffic impact report. John Folsom asked if there were the two deeds required for the application. An-e rated that both properties did turn in the appropriate deeds, John also asked if there was a press release tweet. Anne noted that a press release was serf out to the South Weld Sun, the newspaper the county;s reel mired SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 2000 Page 3 to use for legal publication and press releases. John Folsom noted that the developments weJe not to h;in natural hazard areas, but that this area is in a flood plain and Mr. Folsom asked if the Department of Plant ing Services found this application appropriate for future development in these areas. Anne stated that the applicants are better able to answer questions about future mitigation and engineering associated with t heir properties. John Folsom asked why this area is being added to the MUD area when so much of it "as not been developed, asking why not wait until the rest of the MUD is developed before adding in to this a•ea. Anne noted that the Department of Planning Services' Staff concurred that the application would receive favorable recommendation from the department. John also asked why this area of farmland is being rem o red from agricultural zoning if the Comprehensive Plan states the goal to preserve prime farmland. Anne stied that applicant#1 stated the 80-acre property is not suitable for farming. Applicant #2 state the 240 acre parcel is currently being reclaimed from gravel mining. John Folsom noted that these areas are in the Firestone Comprehensive Plan area as future open space and asked if this is in violation with the Fires;xre IGA. Anne stated that these parcels are not within the Firestone IGA agreement with Weld County. John ilso asked if this application is in the public interest. Anne noted that the Department of Planning Services 5 taff concurred that this follows the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Cathy Clamp asked if there would still be options available to the applicants to develop their property:f [ley were not approved for inclusion in the MUD area. Anne noted that there were the regular options open tc the residents of the county, but being included in the MUD allows for more intense development. Bryant Gimlin asked if there would be an agreement with the St.Vrain School District. Bruce noted hat any development that does happen will have to go through the regular subdivision and land use processes and an agreement will be reached at that time. Louis Rademacher, Applicant#1, stated that he would like to include his land in the MUD district in ardrr tc have more options when he decides to let someone develop his land. Mr Rademacher noted tha:this uric is not very productive and that since the sewer line runs right by the property,it would be good to nave ready for development options. Mr. Rademacher further noted that the reason that they had not yet turned 'r traffic impact study is that they are unsure of how the property will be developed. Michael Miller asked about the high censity development being proposed by applicant#1. Mr Radernar,her rioted that nothing is set in stone and that is the reason a density traffic impact study yet had not beer submitted. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this app ica on Ginny Shaw of St.Vrain concerned citizens stated that they are concerned'with the schools in the area, ha: the MUD is too large already, and that developments should happen in the city. Jack Epple noted that the school capacity levels will need to be addressed, but that if the farmer who -las farmed this land since 1949 states that it is difficult to farm why should the Planning Commission choosa to draw the line just in front of his property if services can be provided. John Folsom stated that he feels these proposals typify urban sprawl and this level cf developmen' sh ruld be accomplished by annexations into towns. He also noted that he feels there is already adequate la rd it the MUD for development. Arlan Marrs noted that since these developments are adjacent to the MUD area and services,these addii ions to the MUD allow the landowners to increase their options. Cathy Clamp noted she would not like to limit the farmer to few options if services run by their land Arlan Marrs noted that the addition of this land to the MUD does not grant development rights, but allows for SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 20O0 Page 4 future development which will require service agreements Jack Epple agreed that anything proposed there will need ro go through a development process- Arlan Marrs moved that R & M Land Management (Applicant# 1) with the 80 acre parcel located in th-:? N2 NE4 of Section 36,Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6"P.M.,Weld County, Colorado be included in the Comprehensive Plan, MUD Plan, Weld County Code 2000-1 and Map#2.1 be changed to inc ude This parcel, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephen Mc krav seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their cecision. .luhr Folsom, no; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant Ci r lin yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion passed. Doug Teifel, Applicant#2, stated that he has an option to buy this property Mr. Teifel noted that there wen- problems with the gravel mine on the property and he assumed reclamation responsibilities and the i.vettanth maintenance. Mr. Teifel also noted that he plans to keep the lakes on the property and have approxima el: 40 one-acre lots with the remainder in permanent open space. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this applicat on Ni) one wished to speak. Arlan Marrs moved that Columbine Land Resources,Applicant#2 with the 240 acre parcel located in pcnioii of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36,Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado be included in the Comprehensive Plan, MUD Plan, Weld County Code 2000-1 and Map #2.1 be changed to include this parcel,be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recornmencatiun cf approval. Stephen Mokray seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their clecisior . balm Folsom, yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple,yes; Bryart Gi rhr yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristo Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker yes. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion concerning the best wording for the Right to Farm Covenant followed,with concerns to the new wording of advisement and the changes Public Works made to the Comprehensive Plan. Cristie Nicklas noted that the committee that updated the Comprehensive Plan discussed in length the addition of the "Parents are responsible for their children" and that if the wording is changing from "covenant to "advisement",this wording should definitely stay. Fred Walker noted that people who take great care with the r children would not take offense to this wording. Discussion followed concerning other places to have the t to Farm information available to the public. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak or or against this applicz liar. N one wished to speak.. Cathy Clamp moved that the wording "Parents are responsible for their children,"be left in the Righi tc Carr) and placed at the end of the fourth full paragraph. Cristie Nicklas seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. John Folsom, yes; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller,yes. Jack Epple, yes; Bryant Gmlin, yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously. SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 2000 Page 5 Arlan Man-s moved to change the title of the Right to Farm Covenant be changed to"N/eld County's Rig!'t to Farm" and that the last paragraph be inserted after the 2n° paragraph and placed as the third comp ete paragraph. Cathy Clamp seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision Jahn Folsom, yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant GimI n, yes; Cathy Clamp. yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker,yes. Motion carried unanimously. Cathy Clamp asked about the addition of highly invasive plant material to the MUD Ordinance. Ann ' nc ted that these types of plant material could be uses on steep slopes where nothing else will grow, and pr op ?rty owners should be alerted to the growth habit of all plant material. Cristie Nicklas moved that staff recommendations to the Comprehensive Plan,County Code 2000-1 with the exception of the previous two applications already voted on with amendments to the Right to Fern- be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephen Mokray seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision J Ann Folsom,yes; Man Marrs, yes. Stephan Mokray, yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple, yes; Bryant Gin lin, yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristie Nicklas. yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Anne Best Johnson presented the MUD changes to the Planning Commission,which include changes to the plants available for landscaping,maps removed from the MUD and placed in the background ordinance and moving maps. Anne also noted that the sign definition will be clarified,that the tables will be kept in one place and noted where these can be found to avoid not updating at proper times. Anne noted that the bacf iprotirid document will be brought before the Planning Commission at a later date. Diane Houghtaling noted that the MUD district will be changing as Public War ks looks at the roads in hie a ea. ..ohn Folsom asked questions concerning working with municipalities on keeping these roads th'n same tnrough where they may run. Cathy Clamp asked if there will be public notices for this arocess. Diane sited that there will be 8 public meetings, as well as to the Planning Commission and the Board of Doi my Commissioners. John Folsom noted that public notices are also published on the county website. Stephen Mokray moved that the staff comments on the third component of Ordinance 191D, County Core 2000-1 beforwarded to the Board of CountyCornmissionerswith the Planning Commissions recommenrJ non of approval. Cathy Clamp seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision . John Folsom,yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller, yes; Jack Epple,yes; 3ryant Gu,hn yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Stephen Mokray moved to nominate Michael Miller for Chair of the Plarning Commission. Jac : E_ple seconded the motion. John Folsom moved to nominate Cristie Nicklas for Chair of the Planning Commission. Cathy CI imp. seconded the motion. Jack Epple moved to close the nominations. Man Marrs seconded the motion. A silent vote commenced with Cristie Nicklas being elected Chair of the Planning Commission. SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 2000 Page 6 Stephen Mokraymoved to nominate Michael MillerforVice-Chair of the PlanningCommission. Cristie Nit Has seconded the motion. Jack moved to close the nominations. Cristie Nickles seconded the motion. Gristle moved to cast a unanimous ballot. Cathy Clamp seconded the motion. Unanimous vain ei;cts Michael Miller Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission. Meeting adjourned at 4:00 p.m Respectfully submitted -. _r tial (;-0 Trisha Swanson Secretary AN & MIXED USE Willie COMPREHENSIVE RLDM SHEET SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN COLORADO Case Number: Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance 147, County Code Chapter 18 Mixed Use Development Plan, Ordinance, 191, County Code Chapter 21 Hearing Date: July 18, 2000 Applicants: 1) Louis Rademacher 2) Doug Tiefel, President Mark Rademacher Columbine Land Resources, Inc. R & M Land Company PO Box 17130 13184 Weld County Road 13 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 Longmont, Colorado 80504 3) Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Request: There are three proposed amendment requests to both the MUD Plan and :he Comprehensive Plan. It is important to remember that the first two proposed amendments to both plans necessitate additional amendments to both plans. The first two proposed amendment requests have been proposed by applicants These amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development (MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2,1propose to include:1) an 80-acre parcel, 2) an 240-acre parcel into the Mixed Use Development area. These two proposed amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follows: Comprehensive Plan Table 5, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map, MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. The third proposed amendment consists of document-wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face, and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendments include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right to Farm Covenant Amendment procedure; and design standards in Section 10. MUD specific amendments include Section 1.1.2 to reflect current boundaries and acreage and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Background Document; Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45 - 47 to reflect correct plant species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. Legal Description: Applicant#1) Located in the N2 NE.4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2) Located a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range fib West of the the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location: Applicant#1) Located adjacent to and south of WCR 28, located adjacent to and west of WCR 13; #2) Located north of and adjacent to WCR 26, located adjacent to and west of'WCR 13. .SERVICE.TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY EXHIBIT - 0 Parcel ID: Applia #1) 1207 36 000029 Applica,it #2) 1207 36 000028, 1207 37 000027 Size of Parcel: Applicant #1) 80 Acres Applicant #2) 240 Acres POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM'APPLICATION MATERIALS There are two criteria for review of this amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Area Plan. The first criteria is found in Section 1.1.3 of the Mixed Use Development Plan. The second criteria is listed on pages 1-2 through 1-5 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: • Mountain View Fire Protection District, 6/14/00 • Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, 6/13/00 • St. Vraain Valley School District, RE-1J, 6/22/00 SERVICE,TEAMWORK.,INTEGRITY.QUALITY AMEN SENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE Pl J WELD COUNTY ORDINANCE 147 Requests #1 and #2: To amend and replace the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan, Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map The Department of Planning Services staff recommends that this request be approved for the following reasons: Page 1-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, Item 2, Weld County Ordinance 147P: A. Comprehensive plan amendment proposals shall be considered bi-annually with a public hearing process beginning in November or May of each year. The application for R & M Land Company was received on March 21, 2000. The application for Columbine Land Resources, Inc. was received May 1, 2000. The July 18, 2000 public hearing was established on June 1, 2000. B. The petitioner shall pay for the cost of legal publication of the proposed amendment and all land use application fees. There is no fee associated with amending the MUD Map. There are fees associated with publication and both applicants are aware of this fee. C. A typewritten original and eleven (11) copies of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be submitted to the Department of Planning Services no later than October 1 or April 1 of each year to be considered for review and public hearings. The application materials were received on March 21 and May 3, respectively. (May 1, 2000 was a Saturday.) Additional materials were required by both applicants. Sucn materials were required prior to establishing a hearing date. It is important to note that the reason for the hearing process delay was that the Department of Planning Services was waiting for a preliminary traffic impact study from R & M Land Company. The Department of Planning Services made the decision to set the Planning Commission hearing date and not penalize the other applicant. To date, this study ha not been provided. This study is required by the Department of Public Works to adequately make a referral on these requests, and shall be required prior to establishing a Board of County Commissioner hearing date. The following items shall be submitted as part of the proposed amendment: (1) A statement describing why the comprehensive plan is in need of revision. Columbine Land Resources, Inc. The applicant wishes to be included in the MUD Area due to the fact that they wish to develop the property in the future and want to follow MUD standards for development. R & M Land Company The applicant wishes to be included in the MUD Area due to the fact that fney wish to develop the property in the future and want to follow MUD standards for development. SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY Page 1-2 of the Comr pensive Plan states that, "Evaluation c e Comprehersive Plan is necessary to pi vide an accurate statement of county land-use goals and policies based on current data and the needs of Weld County citizens." Both applicants wish to develop their properties following PUD and MUD standards. This goal can only be accomplished by this amendment procedure. (2) A statement describing how the proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies, and needs of the County. Columbine Land Resources, Inc. The applicant has stated that development shall be consistent with the MUD Plan The applicant is proposing very low density and the preservation of 77% of the land as open space. R & M Land Company The applicant has stated that the current property is not a very productive piece of agricultural land. The applicant is proposing a mixture of medium and low density residential development, with a small commercial area to serve area residents. The applicant is proposing the preservation of 30% of the land as open space. Comprehensive Plan C.Goal 4 states that it is important to "Recognize the impact of new development on the natural environment and develop measures to mitigate these." Furthermore, O.Goal 6 states that "Provision should be made for open space to meet human needs throughout the County in order to protect and enhance the quality of life and enjoyment of the environment." Both developments shall proceed through the PUD development process which allows flexibility in development. This flexibility shall require each landowner to develop in a consistent manner that will not detract from the future goals, policies, and needs of the County as outlined in the MUD Plan, Comprehensive Plan and PUD Ordinance. In the case of an amendment to the 1-25 MUD area Map the proposed amendment must: A. Demonstrate the proposed amendment is adjacent to and contiguous with the existing 1-25 MUD Area Map. Columbine Land Resources, Inc. This application is adjacent to the existing MUD Map area, with 10% of the proposed amendment being is contiguous to the existing MUD area. R & M Land Company This application is adjacent to the existing MUD Map area, with 14% of the proposed amendment being is contiguous to the existing MUD area. B. Describe how the proposed amendment will not place a burden upon existing cr pianned service capabilities. This statement shall include how emergency services will oe provided to the proposed area. Columbine Land Resources, Inc. The applicant has stated that all of the property can be served by public water and sewer service. Furthermore, the applicant noted that other utility providers are adjacent to Wield County Roads 13 and 26 and are available. SERVICE,TEAMWORK,NTT(RI"FY,QUALI"fY R & M Land Compam The applicant has outlined how particular services shall be met. The applicant includes a detailed description of Roads, Sewer, Water. Fire Protection, Law Enforcement, Schools, Parks and Open Space, and amenities to service the social, cultural and health needs of the future residents. A potential conflict does exist between the designated land use of a 10 acre gravel mining site in close proximity to 210 single family homes. Through the PUD process, potential conflicts shall be mitigated. Comprehensive Plan MUD.Goal 2 states, "To provide efficient and cost-effective delivery of adequate public facilities and services which assure the health, safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County and the area." Both developments shall proceed through the PUD process which requires the developer to indicate details of service provision. C. Delineate the number of people who will reside in the proposed area. This statement shall include the number of school-aged children and address the cultural and social service provision needs of the proposed population. Columbine Land Resources, Inc. The applicant has noted that an estimated 116 residents may occupy the proposed 40 residential lots. The residents shall have access to the recreational amenities providec by the large bodies of water on site. R & M Land Company The applicant has preliminarily proposed a density of 210 single family homes to occur on 31 acres. This is a conservatively estimated population of 525 persons. St. Vrain Valley School District, RE-1J has indicated that, "Should this [these] propcsals be considered for approval, the District would requires the cooperation and participation of the developer and County in implementing a separate agreement to help mitigate the impacts on the schools." Weld County would pursue this issue with the School District. In addition to the amendment to Map 2A, the proposed amendments described above necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use. Such amendments are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Table 5 and the Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map. Request #3: The third proposed amendment consists of minor amendments and major amendments. The minor amendments consist of document-wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face, and alignment for consistency in both documents. There are 6 major amendments proposed as outlined in your packets, and listed as follows: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment Procedure is in need of amendments to reflect current practice, consistency with MUD Plan Section 1.1.3 +and 2.7.2 respectively, and clarification for applicants. 2. The Urban Growth Boundary map needs to be amended to reflect correct municipal boundaries, Intergovernmental Agreement Boundaries and MUD Outline. Six additional communities (Keenesburg, Evans, Eaton, Kersey, Mead and Milliken) have entered into Intergovernmental Agreements with Weld County since the last amendment of this map These Urban Growth Boundaries shall be accurately reflected on this amended map. In addition, should the boundary of the MUD Area be modified with the two applications for inclusion, the outline of the MUD Area shall be amended on this map. SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEOF ITY,QUALITY 3. Map #2.1 Structural L ' Use shall be amended to illustrate th. .orrect land classifications. In addition, should the boundary of the MUD Area be modified with the two applications for inclusion, the outline of the MUD Area shall be amended on thi3 map. 4. Table 5, page 3-17 shall be amended in the event that the two applications for inclusicn into the MUD are approved, the following table shall be amended to accurately reflect land use classification. It is important to note that previous amendments to the MUD Structural Land Use Map have not included an amendment to this Table. Therefore, a:, count of acreage was completed. The figures represented in Table 5 are an accurate reflection of land use designation. 4. Several amendments are being proposed by the Department of Public Works. 5. Amendments to the Right to Farm Covenant. The Department of Planning Services staff recommends that this third request be approved for the following reasons: Page 1-2 of the Comprehensive Plan, Item 2, Weld County Ordinance 147P: A. Comprehensive plan amendment proposals shall be considered bi-annually with a public hearing process beginning in November or May of each year. The application materials were prepared by the Department of Planning Services and distributed to referral agencies with the other two applications. B. The petitioner shall pay for the cost of legal publication of the proposed amendment and all land use application fees. The County shall pay for their fair share of the amendment publication. C. A typewritten original and eleven (11) copies of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be submitted to the Department of Planning Services n later than October 1 or April 1 of each year to be considered for review and public hearings. The County met this requirement. The following items shall be submitted as part of the proposed amendment: (1) A statement describing why the comprehensive plan is in need of rev sion. Accurate information and ordinances which reflect current practice is important for the public to have. (2) A statement describing how the proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies, and needs of the County. Accurate information and ordinances which reflect current practice is important for the public to have. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. SERVICE,ILAUWORK,INTEGRITY.QUALITY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES I PHONE (970) 353-6'00, EXT.3510 FAX (970)304-64)8 INISTRATIVE OFFICES Ce WELD COUN GREOEL1EY555 NCOLORADO 17TH AVENUE 1 COLORADO August 3, 2000 Mr. Doug Tiefel Columbine Land Resources, Inc. PO Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 RE: Application to amend the Structural Land Use Map #2.1 to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Plan, located in a portion of SW4 NW4 and all of the 5.3E4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado (240 acres). Dear Mr. Tiefel: I am in receipt of a traffic impact study for the Rademacher parcel. This study will oe sent to both the Clerk to the Board and to Diane Houghtaling with the Department of Public Works We are in the process of completing the resolution and anticipate a hearing date to be established next week for the end of August or early September. We do understand the enormous pressure individuals are under to become "vested" in ligh!: of the proposed citizen growth initiative. If you have any questions regarding your application and this proposed ballot issue, please contact Bruce Barker, County Attorney, at (970) 336-7235 x 4391. Do not hesitate to contact me with further questions concerning your application. Sincerely, Anne Best Johnson Long-Range Planner a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3`.40 FAX (970) 304-698 C. WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1555 IN. 17TH AVEN JE GREELEY, COLORADO 80(31 COLORADO June 28, 2000 Mr. Doug Tiefel Columbine Land Resources, Inc. PO Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 RE: Application to amend the Structural Land Use Map #2.1 to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Plan, located in a portion of SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado (240 acres). Dear Mr. Tiefel: This letter is long overdue and I apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused. The accessory building currently on the property noted above may remain during any future development of the property. Should a change from the originally permitted use occur, the building may be required to be inspected. This shall be addressed through the development phases of the property. Do not hesitate to contact me with further questions concerning your application. Sincerely, • �1 �-- Anne Best Johnson Long-Range Planner isesQ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970) 1 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 iiiik COLORADO June 1, 2000 Doug Tiefel do Columbine Land Resources PO Box 17130 Boulder, CO 80308 Subject: Ordinance 147 and Ordinance 191 - Request for a Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147)and Mixed Use Development(MUD)Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1) an 80-acre parcel, and 2) an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table 5, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances include document-wide renumbering, spelling correctiors, type face, and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specif c amendments include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right to Farm Covenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specifc amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current boundaries and acreage and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Backround Document; Design Standarcs in Section 2; pages 45-47 to reflect correct plan species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. Dear Mr. Tiefel: Your application and related materials for the request described above are being processed. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for July 18, 2000, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in Room 210, Weld County Planning Department, 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Panning Commission members may have. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property or if the property is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Firestone, Frederick, and Mead Planning Commission for its review and comments. Please call the town of Firestone at 303-833-3291, the town of Frederick at 303-833-2388, and the town of Mead at 970-535-4477 for further details regarding the date, time, and place of this meeting. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Firestone, Frederick, and Mead Planning Commission meeting to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. A representative from the Department of Planning Services will be out to the property a minimum of ten Gays prior to the hearing to post a sign adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-ofway which mint identifies the hearing time,date, and location. In the event the property is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, one sign will be posted in the most prominent place on the property and a second sign posted at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road richt-of-way. .mow The Department of Planning Services' staff will make a recommendation concerning this apalication to the Weld County Planning Commission. This recommendation will be available twenty-four(24) hours before the scheduled hearing. It is the responsibility of the applicant to call the Department of Planning Services' office before the Planning Commission hearing to make arrangements to obtain the recommendation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call. Respectfully, __,/ Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner oct DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3 S40 FAX (970) 304-6198 C. WELD COUNTYGRED1111 g ELEY5C N.17T I)AVEtI' UE 53- COLORADO April 26, 2000 Mr. Doug Tiefel Columbine Land Resources, Inc. PO Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 RE: Application to amend the Structural Land Use Map#2.1 to the Weld County Mixed Use Development Plan and Comprehensive Plan, located in a portion of SW4 NW4 and all cf the SEa of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Tiefel: Thank you for taking the time to highlight contiguity on submitted maps and discuss you-proposal with me on Monday, April 24. This morning, Diane Houghtaling, a traffic engineer with the Department of Public Works, identified the following traffic impact requirements. Please share these requirements wish your traffic engineer. The following numbered items correspond to MUD Ordinance Section 2.7.2: (1) Introduction: Describe the proposed development and parameters of the study area. (4) Trip Generation: Determine daily and a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development using established rates identified in the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers or as agreed to with count', staf°. (5) Trip Distribution: Based on assumptions contained in the MUD area traffic analysis cr market estimated, describe the anticipated trip distribution patters for the proposed development. (6) Trip Assignment: Based on the projected trip generation, assumed trip distribution, end the prevailing roadway network, assign the projected traffic to the intersections and streets within the study area. In addition to the above items, a preliminary description of how this development will impact intersections shall be submitted. It is important to note that additional information may be required by the Department of Public Works to evaluate this application. Additional information the form of a complete study will be required as part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. Effective December 1, 1999, Building Permits issued in specific geographic regions in the county will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Southwest Weld Road Impact Program area 3, (Ordnance 211). You should be adviscu that rui application to petition into dd.dd. MUI. area fall in Ch'dina,,cc area 3. Enclosed is a copy of the ordinance for your review. Do not hesitate to contact me with further questions concerning your application. Sincerely, Anne Best Johnson / Long-Range Planner 46tz)MMEMORANDUM ink To: Monica Daniels-Mika i COLORADO From: Anne Best Johnson it,:' Melt Subject: Petitions to Amend MUD/ omp Plan Map 2.1 Date: 4/26/00 Hello. I will try to write as clearly as possible to communicate the Traffic Impact Stjdy requirement. 1. TuttleApplegate submitted an application to amend the Structural Land Use Map #2.1 of the MUD Ordinance and Comp Plan in October, 1999. A condition of this application was a full traffic impact analysis, as outlined in Section 2.7.2 of the MUD Plan. X Louis Rademacher and Doug Tiefel submitted two separate applications on April 1 , 2000 Both applications were deficient in many areas. I sent letters to each applicant out.lininc these deficiencies, including the Traffic Impact Analysis. 3. Due to the preliminary nature of these application to just petition into the MUD, I met with Diane Houghtaling of Public Works to discuss the "Minimum" information she would want to see to adequately comment on this petition into the MUD. I don't think it is just to ask the applicant to have a full-blown study as outlined in MUD Section 2.7.2. Therefore, Diane made a list jf these minimum items required for sufficient review at this time. This letter is attached. 4. This afternoon, Wendi Inloes gave me a message that you and Lee Morrison had met to discuss this issue. I contacted Lee regarding the requirement. After discussion, Lee feels comfortable with the reduced requirements, as outlined in the attached draft letter 5. I would like to discuss this issue with you, however, before I send out a letter detailing the requirements. This will set a precedence on all future applications Thank you for your time in this matter. SERE ICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY EX / ifs (f ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100 EXT.3510 WI I FAX (970) 304-6498 C. WELD COUNTY1:NISTRA-IVE: OFFICES 555 N. 7TH A 3 AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO April 6, 2000 Mr. Doug Tiefel Columbine Land Resources, Inc. PO Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 RE: Application to amend the Structural Land Use Map #2.1 to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Plan, located in a portion of SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Tiefel: The Weld County Department of Planning Services received a copy of your proposal to arierd the Structural Land Use Map #2.1 to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Plan to include the aforementioned 240-acre parcel on Monday, April 3, 2000. After initial review of this request, a few items are found to be deficient. Your application was submitted before the April 1 [April 3] deadline, however, the application will not be considered complete until the following information is provided: 1. Section 1.1.3 of the Mixed Use Development Plan, Ordinance 191-D Any applicant submitting a proposal to amend the MUD Structural Land Use Map 2.1 shal also submit a deed or legal instrument to the Department of Planning Services identifying their interest in the property. 2. Page 1-3 of the Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance 147-P The petitioner shall pay for the cost of legal publication of the proposed amendment and all land use application fees. There is no charge to amend the Structural Land Use Map, #2.1, however, there is a fee associated with legal publication. This fee shall be assessed and billed to the applicant at the time of publication. 3. Page 1-3 of the Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance 147-P Please contact me to make arrangements to place the point of contiguity on the submitted maps. 4. Section 2.7.2 of the Mixed Use Development Plan, Ordinance 191-D All significant developments within the MUD area shall be required to prepare a traffic irnpact analysis. All traffic analysis information and report shall be prepared and certified by a EXHIBIT 1 5 [The letter is to: Doug Tiefel] Page 2 registered professional engineer competent in traffic engineering. The intent of the analysis is to determine the projects cumulative development impacts, appropriate project mitigation and improvements necessary to offset a specific project's impacts. Do not hesitate to contact me with further questions concerning your application. Sincerely, r ass® Anne Best Johnson L, Long-Range Planner FIELD CHECK inspection date: 7/6/2000 CASE NUMBER: MUD and Comp Plan Amendments APPLICANT: Columbine Land Resources, Doug Tiefel LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Located in a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36 T3N R68W of the 6`" P.M., Weld County. Colorado. LOCATION: Located north of and adjacent to WCR 26, and west of and adjacent to WCR 13. Zoning Land Use N A (Agricultural) N Crop Production E A (Agricultural) E Wetlands, Varra Mining S A (Agricultural) S Gravel Mining on Site, Agricultural W A (Agricultural) W River COMMENTS: St. Vrain River through site. Quite a few wetland areas, cat tails, birds Trail linkage to other properties, ie Rademacher to North along east side St. Vrain Sanitation District pipes all over Goose Haven took over gravel mining permit to finish up and reclaim Anne Best Johns n, ong Range Planner NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 18 2000, at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering a Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147)and Mixed Use Development (MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include for the property described below. Approval of the request may create a vested property right pursuant to Colorado Law. CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 147 and Ordinance 191 APPLICANT: Louis Rademacher and R & M Land Company PLANNER: Anne Best Johnson TYPE AND INTENSITY OF PROPOSED USE: Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) and Mixed Use Development(MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1) an 80-acre parcel, and 2) an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table 5, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances include document-wide renumbering. spelling corrections, type `ace, and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendments include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right to Farm Covenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specific amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current boundaries and acreage and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Backround Document; Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45-47 to reflect correct plan species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. LOCATION:Applicant #1) Located in the N2 NE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2) Located a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the sty ; SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North . _ . Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. ; 6 Ce KL The public hearing will be held in Room • 210, Weld County Planning Department. 1555 N 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. � � Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in �71j,/.� writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on July 18, 2000. Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631. Please call Trisha Swanson at (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540, or Fax # (970) 304-6498, prior to the day of the hearing so that reasonable accommodations can be made if, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, you require special accommodations in order to participate in this hearing as a result of a disability. Fred Walker, Chair Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the South Weld Sun. To be published one (1) time by June 29, 2000. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) s.s. COUNTY OF WELD ) Ruth Pelton-Roby, as manager of Pellon Publishing Company LLC, being duly sworn, states that it is publisher of the South Weld Sun, a weekly newspaper published in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has a Notice or Public Hearing general circulation in said County and has been continuously and uninterruptedly The Weld ublished therein, durin a period of at County PlanningCo Commission P g will hold a nubile hearing on least fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to Tumday,July lle,2000,at the first publication of the annexed notice; 1:30 p,m.For die Purpose of considering YAmendmenls to that said newspaper is a newspaper the Comprehensive Plan within the meaning of the act of the (Ordinance i47),and I liked General Assembly of the State of Use DevelopmenteUDlplan Structural Land Use Map 2 I Colorado, entitled "An Act to regulate the to include roe the wooers - printing of legal notices and described below Approval of IA)CA ION Applicant Ti) the request may create a Located in the N2 NF4 nl adh'el Iisements," and amendments vested properly right pursuant Srction36,Township 3Nook thereto; that the notice of which the to Colorado Law Range 611 West or the nth annexed is a printed copy taken from said orient NUMBER Ordinance Appli 2 l Colorado CASE147 UMBOrdiha R Or ApplicantM,We e2)u Located newspaper, was published in said APPLICANT Iouis portion of the SW4 NW4 and newspaper, andinthere ular and entire Radetnarner and RNMLand an or(he SF4if Section"s. g (ompanc • township 3 Neill.Range o0 issue of every number thereof, once a P L A N N E R ; West of the 611,PM.,Weld week for_L_successive weeks; that said Anne Best Johnson County.Colorado notice was so published in said TN PE AND INTENSITY The public hearing mil be a and no in OF PROPOSED USE: held in ROOm 210. Weld newspaper proper P P F Pany Amendments to the county Planning supplement thereof, and that the first Compre h ensi,e Plan Department.1555 N 1'th Publication of said note . as aforesaid, (Ordinance 147) d Mt d Avenue. Greeley. Use Developmet(MUD)Plan Colorado Comments or was on the oilday of Stmoural I.mtd Use Map 2 I obleaians related to the 2000 and the last o ie __ day Of to include 1) an BO-are above request should he parcel,and 2)an 240 acre _, �u parcel These submitted in writing to the amendments necessitate Weld County Department PELTON PUBLISHING COMPANY LLC additional changes to of Planning Services,1555 reflect accurate land use as N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, follow Comprehensive Colorado 80631, before Plan Table 5 the above date nr J (/� Comprehensive Plan Urban presented at the public By -- -- Growth Boundary Map hearing on July 16.200n F:u lt3n-Roby, Manager MUD Plan.Section I1.2 Copies of the application MUD Plan.Maps 1I and are available for public .2.2. Other amendments to inspection in the SU SCr1hP.d and sworn to before me this both Ordinances inc Department of Planning !,(9 bay of ___ document-w tl e Serf/Wes, 1555 N 17th '— -_"- Ayenue,Greatest.Colorado � �� enumbertnq spoiling 80631. Please cell Trisha //nom 1prmCmnsf type face and '/( Jr��q� alignment for consistency Swenson at (90,or e & x,L(� in both documents 61011. Eel. 354D,o Fa p Comprehensive Plan (970)304-6496,prior to the Not uOtl �'1 /�_ �/ day of the hearing so R al my ommission expires: OI-A'1— / specific amendments reasonable p include page 1-1 to reflect accommodations can be current amendment years made if.in accordance with amendmentstotheRicht to the Americans wlh Farm Covenant DisabilitiesAct you requite Amendment procedure special accommodations in and design standard in order to participate In this Section 10. MUD specific hearing as a result of a amendments include disability. Section 1.1.2. to reflect Fred Walker.Chair current boundaries and yWeld Count Planning sO�®f((��1` and acreage cross- CtlyCommission n n,nR reference n11, lMxp2l ratherfMap To be publrsn.d Ti the � f'`{1n than i t placement of Map South Weld Sun C 1 1 m the Ba '�I ,d p�lttTo be pyblier eel one ll) \Ne Document; Design time by June 292000 Y'f f\QQ standards in Section 2, OL It1J pages. 45-47 to reflect 1 \ O correct plan species �/ � nomenclature and provide �� i a oraatdr selection.liii �/ • EXHIBIT Columbine Land Resources, Inc. April 1, 2000 eld County Planning Ce.tn. APR 3 2000 Julie A. Chester Department of Planning Services RECEIVED Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 North l7`"Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Amendment to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Comprehensive Plan Map Dear Ms. Chester: In accordance with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Procedures, please accept this letter as an application for inclusion of 240 acres into the 1--25 Mixed Use Development Area Comprehensive Plan Map. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of County Roads 13 and 26, in a portion of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1, and all of the SE '-a of Section 36, T3N, R68W. The property is currently designated Non-Urban and is zoned Agriculture. The properly has been gravel mined over the past 20 years and final mining and reclamation are currently occurring on site. The St Vrain River runs through the properly from west to east bisecting the property into two areas north and south of the river. A reduced site plan of the property is enclosed for reference. Please note that on both sides of the river there are two large lakes (approximately 52 acres and 59 acres each). With the acreage of the lakes combined with the St. Vrain River corridor and the existing wildlife/wetland areas the total of approximately 187 acres will be preserved in open space uses. The remaining 53 acres are proposed to be rezoned and subdivision platted at a later date into light residential uses. These areas are designated as Area 1 and Area 5B on the enclosed site plan. The specific request for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. is for the property to be designated as Residential and included into the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area. The property is contiguous to the Mixed Use Development Area at the northwest corner of the subject property with the ownership of the adjacent land by Jerry and Kathy Hamlin The Hamlins property is within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area. The proposed amendment will not place a burden upon existing or planned service capabilities. In addition to the rather limited area (approximately 53 acres) that can be developed, this request is further supporte.l by the fact that all of the property can be served with both public water and sewer. Publie water is available through the Longs Peak Water District and the Little Thompson Water District. Sewer service is provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Doug Tiefel, President EXHIBIT P.O. Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 — (303)665-9390 • FAX (303)665-0165 An existing sewer main line is adjacent to the property on the south (in County Road 24) and the new regional collection line is currently under construction through the northern portion of the property. Both sewer service lines currently are projected to serve the I-25 Mixed Use Development. Area. All other services of electric, gas and telephone are adjacent in. County Roads 13 and 26 and are available. The closest fire station is one mile to the south on the southwest corner of County Roads 24 and 13. Police protection will be provided by the Weld County Sheriffs Department. All future subdivision access roads will meet and/or address the County subdivision requirements. With light residential uses anticipated, it is conceivable that approximately 40 lots could be platted within the 53 acres available for development. At an average of 2.9 people pit- residential unit, a total of 116 people might be possible. The applicant anticipates fewer lots than stated; however, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regulations request a statement on the number of people who will reside in the proposed area. With 40 lots, it is estimated that the number of school-aged children would be 1.5 per household or 60 students. The applic,u,t believes that the cultural and service needs would be met by the residents use of thr large areas of water and open space which would be provided through the development plan. At th.s stage, the applicant would like to title the project "Pelican Shores - A Planned Water Development". Both large lakes are of a sufficient size to accommodate many water ariivitit s which would include sailing, water skiing, paddle boats, canoes, fishing, etc. All lots woad have frontage on the lakes and it is reasonable to assume that people would want to live at :de subject property because of the availability of these water uses. This Comprehensive Plan Amendment is necessary because the desired density and ✓,oning cannot be achieved under the current Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations. "'he proposed amendment would be consistent with existing and future goals, policies and needs df the County by the preservation of over 77% of the property in open space uses. In addition. the St. Vrain River corridor (including a public trail) would be preserved and wildlife habitat .vill Le greatly enhanced and preserved in perpetuity. The number of lots and residents would be considered very low residential density. Due to the availability or both public water and sewer there would be no health risks associated with ground water or septic system uses "'he residents would be able to enjoy the water resources and the expectant lot values would provide an increase to Weld County property taxes and a limited increase to the already planned 125 employment and regional commercial uses. This application is being submitted on behalf of J Bar B, Inc., the owner of the property. If VC II have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me directly. Sincerely, trt$L �1r�FFL_ Doug Tiefel End. cc: J Bar B, Inc. 2 Doug Tiefel, President P.O. Box 17130 • Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 (303)665-9390 • FAX (303)665-0165 04/04/00 TUE 08:05 FAX 30366501'5 Tiefel Enterprises P r," cut Columbine Land Resources, Inc. April 1, 2000 Transmitted by FAX to 970-304-6498 Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 North 17"' Avenue Greeley. CO 80631 Re: Amendment to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Comprehensive Plan Map Dear Anne: This morning I talked with our neighbor to the northwest, Jerry Hamlin. Mr. Hamlin explained to me that they submitted an amendment for inclusion of their property (approximately 118 acres) into the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Comprehensive Plan Map in 1998. The board of County Commissioners approved their application on August 31, 1998 as Ordinance No. 147-0. The Comprehensive Plan Map was amended on Addendum 2.1 - Structural Land Use Map. Please review this information as the map that both you and I have been viewing appears to be superseded with the above-referenced amendment. We definitely have contiguity along a portion of our northwestern boundary with the Hamlin. Sincerely, ��o>.�LL lam• Doug Tiefel cc: J Bar B, Inc. Bob Matthews P.S.. I am enclosing a copy of the correspondence I received from Julie Chester from your office on January 24, 2000. 1 Doug Tiefel, President EnniT P.O. Box 17130 • Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 (303)665-9390 • FAX(303)665-0165 1 4 144(2-,%2000 1 20 343E041E7 ' iL3 EI'Gil IEEP.E PA':E 11' JI,B Engineering Consultants Professional Engineers 918 Eldorado Lase Civil Engimxnne Louisville, CO 80027 Ph: (303)604-1634 Fax: (303)604-1674 April 28, 2000 Mr. Doug Tiefal Columbine Land Resources P.0 Box 17130 Boulder, Colorado 80308 RE Preliminary Traffic Analysis Pelican Shores Water Development Dear Doug, As requested by Weld County, we have prepared this preliminary traffic analysis for the Pelican Shores Water Development. The purpose of this study is to determine a preliminary traffic count for site generated trips, review the anticipated distribution onto the adjacent roadways, and to discuss the site underlying concepts and assumptions. This study will be submitted as part of an application to join the 1-25 Mixed Use Development. This study is prepared without the use of existing traffic count data on the adjacent roads or in the area. Field data collection has been limited to the visual observation of traffic patterns at various tines over the previous 12 months. The proposed Pelican Shores Water Development is a 36 lot residential subdivision on 240 acres at the northwest corner of County Roads 13 and 26, Weld County, Colorado. The site is bisected by the St. Vrain Creek The average size lot exceeds I acre in size and each have lake frontage_ CountyRoad 13 is currently a two lane paved road and IFonns the east boundary of the site. CR 13 is designated as an arterial roadway in the County transportation comprehensive plan. CR 26 is currently a two lane gravel road and forms the southern boundary of the site. CR 13 is designated local in the County transportation comprehensive plan. The river divides the site into two development parcels. The northern parcel is proposed to have 13 lots with access north of the river at an existing gravel haul road- The existing road will be reconstructed to meet the County Standards. The southern parcel is proposed to have 23 lots and will access County Road 26 approximately 'A mile west of the intersection of CR 13. The proposed access aligns with an existing driveway into the site and will be design to County standards. EXMBIT I14/-E3/20110 : ^_G EJ)-EIECI41E,7•' JL'i El IGII IEER' F' ,E �7^ Pelican Shores Water Development Columbine Land Resources April 28, 2000 The daily rate from the JTE Trip Generation Manual for trip generation for a single family rural residential location is 9.57 trips/dwelling unit. Considering the remoteness of this site, the actual daily trip generation could be near 6 to 7 trips/dwelling unit, as people tend to be more efficient with their travel. Using both rates, the daily trip generation is as follows: Parcel Lots Normal Reduced (no) (9.57) North 13 124 78 South �3 220 138 Total: 36 344 216 Trip distributions from the site are assumed as follows(based on ITE rates) North: 60%north/40%south(74.4/49.6) South: 40% north/60% south (88/132) Minor trips to the east and west may occur, however are not generally anticipated. These percentages are based on the planned commercial development in the MUD, employment centers suclh as Denver, Longmont, Loveland, Greely, and Fort Collins, and access to major highways such as Interstate 25, Colorado Highways 66 and 119. In summary,the trips generated from the site may be considered minor in comparison to the overall MUD. A more concise traffic study should be completed after acceptance to the MUD that:accounts fix the concepts of the MUD transportations studies and the regional transportation plan. Sincereh -- - ILEI Engi - is y� y � `�\ •i � jam !: 1\shi 30 36 -1- Project 0•` Paget 05'05/00 FRI 05: 18 FAX 3036650105 Tiefel Enterprises. Ir ' 7001 Columbine Land Resources, Inc. April 28, 2000 Transmitted by FAX to 970-304-6498 - 0 5 pages total Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re:: Pelican Shores - Request for Letter Dear Anne: On the northern portion of our Pelican Shores property, there is an existing garage-type building which received a building permit under the name of Techtonics when they were mining gravel. They processed a flood plain building permit for the building which was to be constructed as an accessory building for the sand and gravel mining operation. The building is still in existence and we would like for it to remain on the property when the gravel mining is complete. We have a plan to incorporate it as a boathouse into our Pelican Shores water development plan. The State of Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board has asked us to obtain a letter from Weld County indicating that the building can remain. It is my understanding that, regardless of whether or not the Pelican Shores PUD is ever approved, the building can remain on the property as an agricultural accessory building. Would you please be so kind to write a short letter to me indicating that the building can remain on the property when our gravel mining is complete? Sincerely, Doug Tiefel Doug Tiefel, President P.O. Box 17130 • Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 EXHIBIT (303)665-9390 FAX (303)665-0165 0 Columbine Land Resources, Inc. a it April 28, 2000 Transmitted by FAX to 970-304-6498 - a- pages total Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Pelican Shores - Copy of Warranty Deed for J Bar B, Inc. Dear Anne: Enclosed please find a copy of the Warranty Deed proving ownership of the SEA/4 and the Sl/2 of the NE1/4 of Section 36, 3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. Weld County. I believe this completes all of the additional information that you have requested for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Sincerely, Doug Tiefel End. Doug Tiefel, President 0(HIBIT P.O. Box 17130 • Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 �^ (303)665-9390 • FAX (303)665-0165 7# 0.1;21:00 FRI 14: 25 FAX 3U36[350` ,- , Tiefel Enterprises. "- J Bar B, Inc. 34600 Fo cadge Road, Evergreen, CC 1804; TELEPHONE: (303) 674-2930• FAX 303 670-32� Apra 21, 2000 Anne Best Johnson Long-Range Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17"Avenue Greeley,CO 80631 Re: Douglas A Tlefel legal Interest in Property Dear Ms. Best Johnson,: The purpose of this letter Is to certify that J Bar B, Inc.is the owner of 240 acres located in a portion of SW4 NW4 and .311 of SE4 of Section 36,Township 3 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. We have entered into a real cstz .: contract for Douglas A.Tiefel to purchase our land. He has our full authority to process a Comprehensive Plan Amendment ail 1 any necessary zoning and/or subdivision applications as may be necessary. Sincerely, (Q _ �� -� ,g_., l[/GC.(� St , v2° Duane Messner Vice President 5fATE OF COLORADO ) pp t ss. County of 1 ...)i.^Lp a ) ) S( Subscribed and sworn to before me this G day of _- , 2000 by Duane Messner,Vice President ofd Ba-Ii, Inc Witness my nand and official seal_ /. C17 � j (SEAL] ta ',/ Notary Public My Commission expires; L1) �0 / 8 Columbine Land Resources, Inc. April 27, 2000 Transmitted by FAX to 970-304-6498 a as y ti y } a Anne Best Johnson Long Range Planner Weld County Administrative Offices 1 1555 North 1T"Avenue ?, Greeley, CO 80631 r � ter Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment foi P4hb '.7Ui -h'�n 'Or perty Dear Anne: Thank you for meeting with me earlier this week regarding the additional information you net for processing our Comprehensive Plan Amendment request. I am enclosing a copy of a notarized letter from the Vice President of J Bar B, Inc. authorizing me to process ally necessary actions on the property relative to Comprehensive Plan Amendment 'Zoning and Subdivision. Early next week, I will fax a copy of the Warranty Deed which proves ownership of the property by J Bar B, inc. When we met this past Monday, I marked on our property maps the areas along our northwest boundary where we have contiguity with the Hamlin property and the existing 1-25 MUD boundary. I believe that item has now been addressed. I also agreed to pay any publication costs associated with the public notice requirements for our request. With respect to the traffic analysis, we are enclosing the report from Jim Blankenship. We definitely wish to continue in the processing of our request al this time and look forward t working closely with you to satisfy any details or questions that you may have. We believe that we have a very unique property and, due to our request for very low density residential that our proposal has merit and will be a positive addition to the I-25 MUD neighborhood and the Weld County residents at large. Sincerely, Doug Tiefel cc: J Bar B, Inc. Bob Matthews of Chrisman, Bynum and Johnson Doug Tiefel, President EXHIBITP.O. Box 17130 • Boulder, Colorado 80308-0130 (303)665-9390 • FAX (303)665-0165 1 i P LC Uhl SC=OCDRIES IPoMoDo A PLANNED WATER DEVELOPMENT fMco-._ I FOFND OF SYMROI5 JCDREA 2B ill I = / % // -�///• / � [WET ANDAS/w�DUFE AREA moo..(s3/ � % // � ii/ L, _ I I MOREAU.LAKE _ —_�1 = III /////////2 /A(1 /l 277.7 c J / / / RECREATION LANE/////// / I / /// j/ \ // Ex.Tre/vw�•ausm Ex MN ACARGIMR,MI --IR L, // / .I21/ LAND USE SUMMARY //, � /// /RECREAEO IOW N LAKE K / / _____JI / � � ',// /(1 /-/ // --4 11 AREA USE AcREAGE �%%/�^4—� J J p / ///;/ /////// j/ / // ///�// / /i 1 DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL �•a III 1 FISrIMG LAKE 4. ,..) % A / ////// / // //////// // 2A RECREATION LAKE 76 - - - 1."\S / // — - 2///i /// // /////// 1"� ,,0 / 28 wEnANDs �uFE L'',)\ // " T AREA 3 // i.// / / / /s/ �i zc vE1LANDs/wnLDUPE sm ST 1RAIN CREEK / � /// � � � y////Y////„/////: /L://,////////// /,�/f�/ 1 'O/// / 2D OPEN SPACE eez // , - / / / //♦ - / / ( "/ ///2// //////'- / / 3 ST VR AIN CREEK CORRIDOR 22 JO ////// \ ///// c /i \ \ /////% /////// / . - -J % i 1A EE: 8:SDENCAL / ' - / 48/// / SB/ mss, / , / / /// /,,//// /// N ,. TOTAL STE.REA.NM Acs SECTION wEM 7 // , •, NIS IS A TECHNICAL PENSION Cr 712E RECTANIAMN ALAN FOR II o 5,72272 A T AREPAREO EH 2 ENBROPPERT MC WED our ma•AHD RAMMED AUCur BB 2 AL UND USE WEAN ARE ArNIAMNIANE NAMES _ -fA _ �� ,...50 ARE sw•,.ATTc pH,A•o ARE SUBJECT AREA 2C A ^ — RLA 4B WETLANDS/w�LDUFE AREA} ,U,,,.ELn UU.. f_.�__ _ OPEN SPACE 5 ALL DISTURBED WAS BBL RE REMIND MTH PASTURE MUSS Au.SHRHE70 AND TREES P _-, OREM PRI BE PLUM IN THE TEAR 2000 1TE AREA NORTH OF THE ST OMB CRUX '-'— — RI,BE RANTED V-ME SAAIE ME PER. ALE Of THE AREA SOW,OP THE ST 270724 ,. we#'3 -��--- ---- -r, - --- - - 7 ,,l'''''''''A "M,Ea.m`TM aE,s o""'«o,L. ' AU-MOREL..AREAS Of,A,2A,MO AA MAU Eit PUNTED 74 CRASS TO 177E,AATERs EWE SR..AND IINTS SHALL BE PAWED IN CAMAS AN AVERAGE INSTANCE OP NEM 17' 250 MONO EACH LARE THE ATM..0R,72.27 sHAEL CONS,OP A MOAN 01 TEN Z om,RATEMAL. �w «mav 77, T A FORMA OE THE SP,.Or ME .AND All OE DI SE /A OP SWIM DS 2 122(1170,REt.HATE U. I _ _ _ ______ ___ ___ 7 __ • • 1 AMMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN-TECHNICAL REVISION Lsue"fa I A'A '.' SHEET JIBEngineering Consultants FOR THE STATEOF COLORADOMINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVSION .....9 l""""_� a -_._ —. - = , GOOSE HAVEN SAND AND GRAAVVEEL INC. NO gym _ 2 DATE BY REV,SION DATE APPV DATE EAx. �a1wA.S 7 Civil Engineerso.Rox D3o A-"°NW OF 2 SHEETS BOULDER,COLORADO 80308 INVI 3 u L6U ea Jj i=* Ir'oUoU. A PLANNED WATER DEVELOPMENT �..._. .. tit_• l'..\ rr +ate - 1,,,,,r OF? /7/: ,��...�� ,�j 1111 slo,ro�s �l t��.`•A 11 11 ..„.........k.. .C i-1, ;1111. , / �' 1111 :Y:. o .'.,ice ,1••, ' ,/,7.\ .V. ,; ..;/ ' 10mow.100. ME ≥ / : ^ ,• ... , 1 %:.., ; __ 1 0/11%%// i ,,/,-,%', j/...' �/% ..� -77 /5/,/ 'IX `�..N'1 ..+w,o..... 1111....._ i///%,, /� .. / f/ //-7/////,- ,, .��/� /. r- ,.wc Esc sUW,N+, 7. a//X.-7'J/7, :. p - • r 1 ;.-7/--- /,,,,,/..,/../ •,,,,7•••• <;„,,,,,/,..., •/,•,/ • ir MCA LIE �� / t // -.,'.1....... ./..2 ://'/':/./. // "1Viiirs\ f /zrAy ","•*-, / `// /+ b %:• % . :. aa�ranou 4Vfc- .�,._._� . _1 f \49 # `''-:. f---� ilk . o /'fr %�/.. 2C INCILAND2/211.0L2T .0* 14.11..1 t7 ND , o. ,, y�,..��`. 'j/ % :Vii/ i N � 3 ST MAM CIIF•pt CDII,SDOP A, I %' ,,J/�:`� '/� .;,�j i.•/ •4..,� 7. / 93 CPD.SPACE 91• i3O '�� i/, �.:ire� .;� ! "% i, 7i // /.,-//., '%%j /.� 9 OEYELOP,ENT•11E90dnAl. no '%i r , 777 ii : , .S 6 .- r . ' " ' �% /,/ s V.', ////: ..„4I%.7..-'1' L -• ..- „ ,,,11 ..,,,: .;. , /,•: /.'r ! - -_1111, %� . �•% . . � �/' I, , -� :• >'::.�. , =RN J01 I '� %'II k //:;: .. :: :. : = _ . ,�._� J ..A �0� 1111. ........ • • I • ISp.NYn� "d M"Y I f . - • N So • � �\1Ia1�1 `. •+fw rnMYZ MU•••Mt swm (-`'•a - 1111 • P.. u.Y ra rV.n Cir TM FT VP. 1 " W , j_-- -.�_ - a - v ,.�J Am�� 1111.. • 1 �.Yf�M,M•4Y Y.,bMw • . - 1111 • � � h.YMO nw[..l Ya iYym,�y� ___1111 -a':+i .�.�... •;1111 W1.tl1 00 Ya VOLMIVOILM,rig if You.le..lMY ow am.Puma MM YID tr. r. m'M0.i Wum .•i YY ou M.l MM.. m.u.MO••. ( "� M Y/�v 4 -� I 1 I B Engineering ConsultantsI rti.S1TAI ORCOLORATI MINE.N- DREC ALAMATION uIvS NNi�INNi��tt...•..... .1 SHEET I- _--. � MY Civil glu e f F VR A DAILY PIT-PERM NT NO. N DIV$j0[M d - ------- ...w:.,Tc NO.M-840Y1 Mr NNr, 2 { GOOSE HAVEN SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. I a. -1111 —1111 •,..6......:. I 1 i ecu7a c .iwo'•xne ► Avg .1OF I SHk.AIS 05:05/00 FRI 05:18 FAX 3036650165 Tiefel Enterprises Ir - VOH: 1 -• • • — - sn>!� - i-_ rte •` v, \� cri _.� . w I 1 . .;.:Cfk ".::: H• t NI is c.• \ ) t ) I d ♦. o it ca c i- h •CL____ 0 ... - — wCka fi� r�, / �I \ 3 t. t DroYncs Luke `I i--1-4"9- I v Ri " ►.cx in Q P Mulligan ___� 1 F \` �� Res. ,, $9 PO �� ,T ! ? -%` 'i ( 24 is "� \ f nu MCA i311 ( Fos � 30 29 LQp Re 4-\ \ O( rp ail ti,Olt _ 1 _ rcl_iIs i eevecer- \ I \ r j1 Lo a ed 1` p i 1 ra � � P V Cars sk sr (Union Res. / \ > " z�"* \ ( t t +It"" -/ v pp �. / xg s I. ccx ,I. / lip -AI ..� J } .. Y 81CI t 11 A � iah , ti 40A44 i ♦, _ r. nrm�! I �� Ill) ea rr tat #14 w fit P Yy f Yr /d Yt`, t' t 7 \. to PJ t,31 I.C.R. Izas �� P1 i 4,:�. Vey --.% _ 4® � 1 - �ACx Ito v v c5 0421101 dI/ILrI r,�--, R \ 4' ► ► 0 1500 3(00 Feet Noe Legend -- — I-25 HUD Ana Boundary I Limiting Site Fodor — Lowest Intensity ks.. N Town/City Annexations If Employment Center — High kdepitY NM Ragland Pak — — County Boundary Existing Roos Ragland CaCommercial — Hedu t n InteneRY /CP/\ Community Pak ! w E _ --� propped Rood I) �W Canter — Loser Intensity Cpl Neighborhood Pork • Regions Trail System \� Do Y er Cammunit Troll L I Residential '.1 /rant Center --- sKtion tti. +/ * Historic/Community Center g I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map Y.....6 17 IOml nt. I \,,I .� JI \ e • \.2 :I R1 a s s Loke�j Mulligan \ ,. \'\, Res i 0 \ ir: I 1‘� ya 20 A� 121 tit. 24 19 \\l. - k`I 4 . lit ! I I ae MI S I 1 \ I\+ I cc.R- pad I ,. ' -- 30 asr�. l Ya Re. ,YI .> �. so jj 'kpndbo el s C°1 y R�+ x I {p. ReaW aH714 Rby�LJ " tiis !Ij �kN �`_"�''r "'" y ,...it:�irea. R I VIII / L � * 1 ei, ►7. ntHY\ � ntit,. Calmsoke 1ssy (Uniones-) A It I� 1 � "`" d•I•; T \ - - 1 t, 9C.A. ua - " lr - -- n ��/jamIow/ �Vi 411 ?!y 1 ;it.: l'' . r it#0, V re -" w,^€ I II alt #24 I4 l 3, I17 �5 ' 67 I i�.. I �pr �� J. 1ja. ia r1; l a.CR aaa CA ICJ7a r : } n i�, .CR .a96 .- '%''‘ii.: - 0:4": : lkt‘WIE . -T p -7:.--t . , ;t . i 1,, _ la � " -ZED Li v *� ` Z 0 1500 3000 Fee W Legend I-2S MUD Area Boundary I°`. `%--1 Limiting Site Faetors— Lomat Intensity :I.\ Ni,. Tom/City Annexations N mini .` Regional Pork -- County Boundary Employnait Center-- High Intensityli.�r a . -- Existing Road us Regional Commercial — Medium Intensity O Community or -- Proposed Read W E Nnal9.hborhaod Center— Low Intensity Regional Troll Spasm Lower © Neighborhood Pork ........ ..r .t„ .........Other Community Tree illiaallir '., I I Residential O Transit Center --Section Line * Hletorle/Canmunity Canter --Proposed Change S 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map MAY 15. 2000 ILL__ E___ in =..:,ti SHIl9/i-86 , I 03'.� ` DETAIL F' '--_� GF'`,. J ` I _ q ITCH ISs Rareu a I Ti . y�.. MuYrgun ��yy a i Re: nl b I u c is SH 119 ` ► �r ',....• ► k \ c � - id itfie �® 24 19 \ J tir25 , 1/4' J f ' Iic�eIsa i. vs Re:.i te �'� m ' Ies so \ so 4l/ 1pndb_: (\ (J S s. F K '� 1 ' , Rest ss:r'' ", L....„../ �. J RSVP' Re I i �� --ice �� i 4/ /� 34 as `S. ■ t tl 92 \ �1' Adkins 'u6 i �'� i'•. tttttt.! ‘.... — .- } V Ife ,, _ _ 1 ' I� r SH -, Ct HJ. 209 NCR 124 er VHa l ---� I l j rn ' 7s'cYtI/e ' �' ai r ; _ ' i I =N�' J ' al I_e end l U n 9 0 15 CC 3000 F.•1 — — 1-25 MUD Area Boundary ^'— 2 Lane Collector N mai.NM Interstate 0 Existing Signal •moo 6 Lone Major Arterial O New Signal w w —•4444 4 Lane Major Arterial O Transit Center „4 Mg — —^' 4 Lane Minor Arterial S 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.2 Structural Transportation Network *DEPICTS TRANSPORTATION PLAN AS BUILD OUT OCCURS Fabrunry. 1997 - - — in - �SB IIVI-25 .-, I " INTERCHANGE ��'--� e r_ ra, I.C.A. /S2 rik Mulligan o; a ► Res r t Z pp SH 119 / . ii '\ 3 7_ .21 ) --}^M yes e4 le \y ;r \ —L i I '' fosfe ' l= �.Y " m Res.(( �� m I E5 do \_, m QQ,r ..sW. ndbor� rl. s 29 I Rr\ / ) 'I I WE 8671 1' WEI �� l ', " V.C.R. ne )32 a x m �. i CC m�m kins Lake /� } ��` E i�'`� 1, (Union Res.) / \ I C FICA_/a E ! J - 4 �' . to a ,c a �_.,.�._ f iy' ,! B, i il G 96 •4 • is ' '/,� iu . . I1B T1 a-ggst4—._ .r ' i}. I,,1) .. . i�` ICR In , 0 r! r I ' �— � I��, ...,,...a_........-..- _¢ la - - _ - is ` Y"lr H ' --.16-....4 �i 94�. LI ' IC.R1/Ro.B YY I II /^ a I- VC.R. /SO a _t t _ Le end l__f- I-7 9 0 1500 9000 Feet — — 1-25 MUD Area Boundary 2 Lane - Collector N am am= Interstate • Existing Signal ▪ ••— 6 Lane Major Arterial O New Signal IN IP e --- 4 Lane Arterial with Raised Median CTi) Transit Center rt. mg — -- 4 Lane Undivided -. Secondary S 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.2 Structural Transportation Network *DEPICTS TRANSPORTATION PLAN AS BUILD OUT OCCURS Febnniry. 1997 - - �./i 4Iii 'L ..' 4 yz/y /. // sax Jw r 4 4-4 - car/� • `�/// /�.,.� % /// / / t /,; �'i, .ft wi,; i- : $s yI"' i '.yr,�.. .% % ,%y`'J 4.1,7;2�� %✓/. rt~�'�1Lr''% _ice i!/ " 47 fir ,— Ili, '`�y' " G ///i/ ;64 it 9•!ly."ti��Y�i °;li•' _/.CR in 4u' '� ▪ /, ti. 400/41,/)”..,,,I.% / resew t -- / e y, .sky �1,/tpr ��/ f,/ r (� '� % 'e+�s$J/r�/�/ 141 itlikki— r- in f 4d v▪ t1/21‘,„ti 1 /1 • 4.' '' b 111 s./ L ,. ICA fa " i Al. .37/1 ,,.,- ✓ /'//,%7/ j ,/ 1;, a / // ,y/, / /�'4,*a�,r, r . f� pJtq7j /, tit2 • IC w 0. K Legend N — 1-25 MUD Area Boundary State Lands ma �� 64. — Commercial Sand & Gray& Resources rr • Schools Prime Agricultural Lands W E A Fire Stations/Police Stations I, ,-. Primary Drainage ways �I p. Ill Community Activity Facilities 6-, --1., 100 Year Floodplain S 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 1.1 Regional Influences December, 199t REFERRAL LIST NAME: Louis Rademacher and R& M Land Company CASE NUMBER: Ordinance 147 and Ordinance 191 REFERRALS SENT: June 1, 2000 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: June 23, 200( COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES _X Attorney Ault _A:__Health Department ___Brighton _Extension Service Broomfield Emergency Management Office Dacono A: Sheriffs Office Eaton _X Public Works Erie ___Housing Authority Evans ___Airport Authority X Firestone _X_ Building Inspection _ Fort Lupton ____Code Enforcement _X Frederick STATE Garden City X__Division of Water Resources Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley __Department of Health Grover X Department of Transportation _ Hudson X Division of Minerals and Geology Johnstown X Water Conservation Board _ Keenesbuig Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _ Kersey Division of Wildlife: LaSalle _ Loveland Lochbuie Greeley ___Longmont Division of Minerals/Geology X Mead ARE DISTRICTS Milliken Ault F-1 New Raymer .._Berthoud F-2 Northglenr Eriggsdale F-24 Nunn Brighton F-3 Pierce Eaton F-4 Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 _ Severance Galeton F-6 _ Thornton Hudson F-7 Windsor Johnstown F-B La Salle F-9 X Mountain View F-10 COUNTIES Milliken F-11 _ Adams Nunn F-12 _ Boulder Pawnee F-22 Larimer Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Poudre Valley F-15 US Army Corps of Engineers __Raymer F-2 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Aviation Administration Windsor/Severance F-17 _ Federal Communication Commissio Wiggins F-18 _Lnion Colony F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER _ Fort Collins _X _School District RE-1J Greeley Ditch Company _X Longmont X__Ginny Shaw _ West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER , BIT K John Folsom N3 / ft A 9 i ii,‘.v Weld County Referral O June 2, 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Louis Rademacher and R & Case Number Ordinance 147 and Ordinance M Land Company 191 Please Reply By June 23, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson Project Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) and Mixed Use Development (MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1) an 80-acre parcel, and 2) an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table 5 Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances inc:ude document-wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face, and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendments include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right ro Farm Covenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specific amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current bounoanes and acreage and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Backround Document; Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45-4' to i reflect correct plan species nomenclature and provide a greater selection Location Applicant#1) Located in the N2 NE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2) Located a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. I The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recom,'ienda_ion you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so 'hat we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on tf is ca!e may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any fuhh :r questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) July 18, 2000 J We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1.J 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longrnont • C O • 80501 3499 303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682 '343 June 20, 2000 Weld County Planning Dep, Anne Best Johnson Weld County Department of PlanningServices jl JN 22 2000 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Co 80631 E� V EE RE: Louis Rademacher and R & M Land Company Amendments Fthamipre ensive Plan/Mixed Use Development Plan (Part of Sec. 36, T3N, R68W) Dear Anne: Thank you for referring the Louis Rademacher and R & M Land Company Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan/Mixed Use Development Plan to the School District. It appears that this project includes an 80 a:re parcel if at could include up to 210 units and a 240 acre parcel with up to 40 units. The projected student impact upon the St. V,.,:in Valley School District of what appears to be 250 new single family units on 320 acres is a total of 166 students. Any students living in this subdivision would attend Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle, and Skyline High School uncer the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development anc other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. Bus transportation would likely oe required. This Proposed Development Cumulative impact of this Develooment Plus all Final Development Plans 1995-00 Building Oct. 99 Student Projected Over Proj. Stdnts Total Cum. Seats Availabl Capacity Enrollment Impact Enrollment Capacity 95-00 plans Enrollment W/Cum. Impact Elementary 504 708 88 796 Yes 459 1255 -751 Middle 397 394 35 429 Yes 436 865 -468 Senior 1299 1309 43 1352 Yes 347 1699 -400 166 1242 -1619 _ The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a stuth'nt enrollment standpoint. This development would impact all levels of school in the current attendance area. While there are new schools planned in this area which should reduce overcrowding, there are other approved developments wli ch would, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools. As the volume of developments increases in this attendance area with no alleviation of the existing overcrowced conditions, the ability to provide the Same quality education fo: these new students that is provided students in o"-.er areas becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore, the District would oppose this land use amendment because it would add to the enrollment of an already overcrowded school. Should this proposal be considered for approval, the Dist ict would request the cooperation and participation of the developer and County in implementing a separate agreemen to help mitigate the impacts on the schools. This agreement would include the calculation and payment of an appropriate cash in-lieu of land dedication fee to address the capacity concerns at these schools (per the attached chart). Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, non, colt Toillion, AICP Planning Specialist EXHIBIT "Excellence - Our Only Option" Exhibit A School Planning Louis Rademacher and Standards And R and M Land Calculation of Comp Plan Amendments In I inn Facia Single Family . II- School Planning Standards Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in-lieu Units Yield Standard Acres Contribution Value Contribution I Elementary 250 0.35 I 525 10 1 .67 $25,100 87.5 F - I Middle i o of 250 035 14750 25 1 .17 °25,100 - - High School 250 0.17 1200 40 1 .42 $25,100 42.5 i_.-. _. il..---- .-- ---.. .--i -----__ -1—__.- _. - -- ---- --- - ------.-. . ..-.-- Total 165 - + 4.25 $25,100__ ; $106,675 Single Family Student Yield is .66 $427 ___. __. ' Per VIOL I 6/20/00 "5 .‘" Weld County Referral ' Weld County Planning Dep. C June 1 2000 ,lU� 15 2000 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Louis Rademacher and R & Case Number Ordinance 147 and Ordinance M Land Company '91 Please Reply Ely June 23, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson • Project Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) and Mixed Use Development (MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1) an 80-acre parcel, and 2) an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additional changes to reflect accurate land use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table °, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances include document- wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face, and alignment for consistency in both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendments include page 1-1 to reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right to Farm C:ovenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specific amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current boundaries and acreacie and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Backround Document; Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45-47 to reflect correct plan species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. Location Applicant#1) Located in the N2 NE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2) Located a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. _ The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date nay be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable July 18, 2000 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Flan U We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4d See attached letter. Comments: Signature i (�� Date • (O - A -UCjMST Agency v c tc�- /4.:,,k,-r.U*'_ roUNL14y tvIOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT R , wa Administrative Office: • a 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501 e \ (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 FAX (303) 651-7102 VIEW ✓ June 14, 2000 Ms. Anne Best Johnson Weld County Planning Department 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Johnson: 1 have reviewed the submitted materials pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requested by Louis Rademacher and R & M Land Company (Case Number: Ordinance 147 E.nd Ordinance 191). The property named is within the boundaries of the Mountain View Fire Protection District and receives service from the District. The Fire District does not object to the amendment provided subsequent subdivision, use and development of the property meets the requirements of the Fire District. All applicable codes as they pertain to building construction, water supply, fire hydrant locations, street designs, and fire department access must he met al :he time development occurs. Subdivision and/or development plans will need to be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to approval. We appreciate being involved in the planning process, should you have any questions, please contact me at 303-772-0710. Sincerely, LuAnn Penfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: Louis Rademacher, 13184 Weld County Road 13, Longmont, CO 80504 project file file Ip06.15.00 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 itatton' 9119 Cnty Line Pd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P O.Box 4L. Longmont,CO Longmont.CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest t. 80501 80504 Mead CO 80542 Niwot.CO 80544 60026 Erie,CO 60516 Dmono,CO 6L"4 14-11) ‘'.;, ...), willWeld County Referral C• June 1 , 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Louis Rademacher and R & Case Number Ordinance 147 and Ordinance I M Land Company 191 I Please Reply By June 23, 2000 Planner Anne Best Johnson Project Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) and Mixed Use Development(MUD) Plan Structural Land Use Map 2.1 to include 1) an 80-acre parcel, and 2) an 240-acre parcel. These amendments necessitate additiona changes to reflect accurate land use as follow: Comprehensive Plan Table 5, Comprehensive Plan Urban Growth Boundary Map MUD Plan Section 1.1.2, MUD Plan Maps 1.1 and 2.2. Other amendments to both Ordinances include document. I wide renumbering, spelling corrections, type face, and alignment for consistency in j both documents. Comprehensive Plan specific amendments include page 1-1 to I reflect current amendment years; amendments to the Right to Farm Covenant, Amendment procedure; and design standard in Section 10. MUD specific amendments include Section 1.1.2. to reflect current boundaries and acreage and cross-reference to Map 2.1 rather than 1.1; placement of Map 1.1 in the Backrourid Document; Design Standards in Section 2; pages 45-47 to reflect correct ular I species nomenclature and provide a greater selection. t Location Applicant#1) Located in the N2 NE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Applicant#2) Located a portion of the SW4 NW4 and all of the SE4 of Section 36, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommenda ion you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that ve may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) July 18, 2000 We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. LI See attached letter. Comments: Signature �/`t. ' /77-1199‘4.((b0“._ Date / ) ...)-0;,c_.", Agency I� /AR:is P1/ r f _- EXHIBIT -Weld County Planning Dept. :•1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 4r(970)353-6100 ext.3540 :•(970)304-6498 fax Weld County PI:inning Dep. JUN 13 2000 RECEIVED APR-28-2080 F RI 02:38 PM FAX N0. P n2 • Its c ‘;'14.1, ' - •L AUG 2=1973 .rte •P.' D . t..L rW J1it 'alai , IOa.r7 )I, ff:mry s:arnd'am 00.1amd.Lie .5iS .Ist7-'kf{1t• 1N - ,, ' • bee.m:a1. L. HalllT ad Ririe,* havtr .al tlr ti a 'teaVd add - ,'' n dahlia).-WC... - : at Gonda -W ant ut.sad. � • P • Arta*d it r.05 rW Bute et . Colorado I e..1��T ameba O.i.r.r M! i, ,H del..a Mtar$' . ^' rat pen. Mr;and In-.w•l n lI of Ile e n se^ lea mil lsri '16.1.;toe •son Pit top w'tti d ire osllar. BattkiBn vat in bend en'Pad ke IMP Patna*, PHN'.t I. �. b ttr eYdtwefee at lore Brat vast 6LeapW M dpi edd9erlr d'b-,•e^!a pat W..apt�)' ' ,, lai,./l alescongaed end.ataeete4t.d.L ws;.anted.6eeleea,.ntd pea o•ieend,ept•t.l ran.pine,de o `rneSL.Pln..mt4 e.er0.ad tealrvy m6:as Yid Peri of nA.Ne-rd Ditr.'It.ma.wt itd.e$a!newer.- o'.. ea if ilia.l.H.Hi.desulbdlel ernace1 -cu.nLdtaarwlftar Andra*le no o tear ..t.a Mid `red taco d,Gl Pe -wil - SwChNee•Q later (Stk), and she'pwtk Llflf at of the lerthwt Qeerter(91)lifk) • ' ,of nettles.Skim-afi;(]6).lreaaikfp Spree (3);Lei cbt lin:e:Sfatv'caibt (64) .-. •Idea of the26th I.W.1:•' 7 709EfIRIZ UTTI .11 ditch asd water.:r11htp .ppert.bathp to pate pedetees taclada. '":fat-ow.(2)'.bar..of,the c-pitad stock of tai Situ h:Ditch aitd so l lea. ,V to rtgbth of..7'for. toddle dttans and Ilion'eepleaata;at:tee ef.%record in .e` . ew 'slitter eat per.[lealirl!,those entailed it,.faatie:eat6,tetarded,It Hoot . • 877; ar page• :437 .ad,413.,red is Pork 296 at let' 119 of"the 11.14;Meaty reterdtt:mad .Object to reseteedeea Ili the Potent co tall feed!" ' -: - awriYtn}barb`s ee fa.Mane tflerig. l'I.. en.ed end tta PP b.redlten®Y red asp�Maon!. u��;nod is• _ . • �itPrats,dr,*,eletewNr mlx.addm:id erbe..ekide .r.ba aid peioi.W Sib. won tlWtln la. " y..rt.u,rusk Woe.h.tmnt tLlm sad demand wleuaw.r a!W,YId grt:fe.o[6.ProfPaT. at...ty.al.le rod fa the above buPbed DreJP.. Pak lie b.eedlaelwa sod ap1rle a'. - • . 7a rani Aph SO a0LD the Pala Tendon.h'.:prised.M de.mlled,wltb,the spT14eatcey,onto Op' said Trt7 if On.w end Part,as raneloan Bad"..lR.Saver.Ana Up 5h.add Tat tol .t tor./Int� part.,,ti tbleea. thelene:eleedt.w..al.dmlrWW. n;de. .ac.eeiT,yn.t bercda and sate p W We War ref the.acrd i!a.14.acne..sad ertee.tat et the Woe W �1a pfd t: • - tlr➢moat•',then,•see.on egad olio Teeiw'eror.-Yvwynl,Y d reed.s.r .Trtfaet .:tuLle.atbl:nap*et I.ba9ai:.In tae.In Ise dmif.nd hove /tea,lore.lea ear era t.:tel irme.ltr tee . ' .,net,b enno sea and coney lore sons Is aYaar end fatal-ofenaetde eN lot clap Pane an Rae en tier lam as lo min,; d shit rms.barn's,Bate.ben,tens.aaaaaare Bed IaMebnaat d'!atone(Ind er.ala,. .ewer, expect a11'Ilene tad eacesbranes►of reaped: and:eteept.the Cowered tepee for'the year.1468, payable In 19698 - - ' + aid the elm.baawla.d pnapeeo to the nal.d and"inviable pn.a.IbI d the ate pelt!.'f the period Dal.1V - . ime:own god deka%ambit all end awry person ar peon, la.fa�b adder at ia,.Wm(i.e scat.er-,Dart. I. • tlm.wd..rhe WdDpttfeaef the fleet sett pMa ad eta wACFAHf AND,YO1lr n&D9dttro. , . . tare arreassld rbeir !ends , a.1r11)e0.. H'IDRHOrfirs Bala Aft Sat of die. Dart i' '!)� old soma . W gar.aa near one etme.edn+ey /ice)// r/qC. [etALi AhmR add sad Miter d Is N.pe.aern of l - ......t.:-...• urAlY W-lA e., tp.Rp i Caatfd._ear-4✓C'[c. L ..:1 /-d deed .nccl,t.. a: O, - faa®ele -ill: ded.•dbd.noattri 1 C. ?t r s L. hai1N i.d H.ehaiae cal ley. Way .••".gcase pea et+kld sal_" ': fyoamsl.Ba.dpw a _ -r —�• =Spy ratan a®lo_f..w..scor5ie..+ar.erer.+a r_t—e:o.-1.. r+�III `n - t ..,. c u F.t..uuwt�, , �- .. 05/05/00 FRI 05:19 FAX 3036650165 T1efel Enterprises. Ir i; on3 Eiviroinet, Iic. LARRY E. O'BRIAN 9989 WEST 60TH AVENUE PRE$Ioe:NT ARVADA,COLORADO 50O04 303-423-7297 February 6 , 1991 Mr. Keith Schuett Weld County Planning Department 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Mr. Schuett: RE: Tectonic Construction Company, J Bar B, Inc. , Flood Plane Hazard Overlay Permit Attached is the Flood Plane Overlay permit information needed to finally solve the problems caused when the Garage was con- structed. I apologize of the length of time it has taken to get this far. In researching various methods to get this garage into compliance I have found a publication from the Colorado Water Conservation Board titled `Colorado Flood Proofing Manual. ". In this manual on page 2 Table 1.1 Classification of Ploodproofed Structures, it shows a • Class C building as being -one form of floodproofing. Class C structures fill with water to counter balance the outside hydrostatic forces. We feel this would be the way to retrofit the garage so it is floodproof. It would also be the most economically feasible method of floodproofing to carry out. The garage is not a residential structure therefore a Class C designation is applicable and water in the garage will affect its use after a flood. I know this does not meet the letter of the Zoning ordinance, but if you consider 53 .2 .8 as it applies to Commercial uses the garage would help stabilize the tax base on the property. There are no provisions for this type of flood- proofing on a building in the Zoning Ordinance, however we feel this plan has its merits. We have not checked a statement on the first page of the Flood Hazard Permit certification because the building is not elevated nor will it be watertight. The attached text explains how we arrived at the IRE level and includes necessary information on the garage, bridge crossing and gravel piles. It also explains how Tectonic will retrofit the garage to make the modifications permanent so no one has to be at the site if a flood did occur. Gillian' s Engineering, Inc. has provided the Improvement Location Certificate since they did the original survey of the • EXHIBIT ---�L_ 05/05/00 FRI 05:20 FAX 3036650165 T1efe1 Enterprises Ir " nca property. This Improvement Location Certificate map showing the garage location, bridge/conveyor crossing and existing elevations. We have retained Complete Engineering Services to review our design of the floodproofing measures and certify the Application Form. Mr. Edward Ford will be the one that checks to see that Tectonic has met the requirements as approved. Attached to this letter is a packet containing : 1. Exhibit A, addition information that you may need to better evaluate this plan. It contains information about the garage, conveyor/bridge crossing and the gravel stockpiles. Also included are three drawings showing a plan view of the Garage, a Plan and Overhead view of the bridge/conveyor crossing and a drawing of the proposed floodproofing open- ings. 2. The application form with all necessary items checked and certified as required. 3 . A copy of the Flood plane map showing the property outline and the location of the garage and bridge/conveyor crossing. This map is a composite of sheets 7 & 8 of 10 from the Colorado Water Conservation Board (St. Vrain River and Boulder and Idaho Creeks, Del Camino Area) . 4 . A copy of a Vicinity map, an excerpt from a U. S.G. S. Quad. map showing the location of the pit. My qualifications to prepare this information are as follows. I have a degree in Civil Engineering and have passed the Colorado State Engineer In Training test and am preparing to take the Professional Engineers' exam. State laws allow me to preform engineering work under the supervision of an engineer and said engineer may sign and seal documents prepared by me after review- ing them. In addition I have worked with many counties in Colorado preparing applications and documents necessary for Special Use permits, Re-zoning cases and Planned Developments. Please let me know if you have any questions about my qualification that you feel affect this permit. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENT, INC. W Stevan L. O' Brian Vice President enclosure cc Tectonic Construction Co. Complete Engineering Services. 05/05/00 FRI 05:20 FAX 3036650165 T1efe1 Enterprises Ir C nn5 • EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. ' The garage floor is approximately 2 .5 feet above the existing ground level. This places the top of the floor at 4805 .78. A 4 inch floor slab was placed on compacted fill as a foundation for the garage. The slab contains fiber mesh additive (fiberglass fibers) as a strengthener and "J" bolts anchor the garage to the floor. 2. We used the Colorado Water Conservation goa a' s ar Vral„ al. Map. sheet 8 of 10, to estimate the 100 year event flood level. From this map it appears the Intermediate Regional Flood (IRF) level would be 4809.28. This is approximately 3 .5 feet higher that the floor slab. The Plan View drawing attached shows the IRF elevation, floor elevation, the location of the garage doors and the floodproofing openings. 3 . Four self opening panels will be installed two (2) on the west side and two (2) on the east side of the Garage. These openings will be constructed so the water can enter and leave the garage thus equalizing the water pressure in the garage. We plan to cut out a section of siding between two wall studs, install a top brace and add the security bars. At present we are looking for a suitable closure to cover each opening. The coverings will be automatic in that the force of a flood would cause them to open. This will meet the guidelines in 57 .7 .1.7 in part " . . louvers, screens or other covering. . " can be used and that they " . . should open automatically . . . . " The openings on the north and west swing in and the ones on the east swing out allowing the building to drain or fill as necessary. we will make sure they are free to open as needed. In addition the main doors could be opened also if needed to drain the building after a flood. We have added the iron pipe to the openings to provide security and to keep large debris out of the building. The building is 27 .5 feet by 30.5 feet. Using the formula of one sq. in. for every sq.ft. of floor space, we find the minimum opening area should be 838.75 sq. in' s. The opening will be 12 inches by 22 .5 inches, the total for all 4 openings will be 1 ,080 .00 sq . in. ' The attached drawings show how these units will be constructed. Cables will be placed over the building and will be anchored to the ground using ground Anchors . This will insure that the building does not 'leave the slab should a flood occur. As noted in Section 53 .7 .1 .8 , all electrical panels and heating equipment is to be located " . so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. ". They will be five (5) feet 05/05/00 FRI 05:20 FAX 3036650165 Tiefel Enterprises . T' " 000 or more above the floor of the garage. This will place them above the IRE level. 4. The bridge and conveyor units will span the main liver channel. The bridge is roughly 20 feet wide and the conveyor unit is 12 feet wide. They will be set side by side making the entire width 32 feet. They will be elevated above the flood plane so the bottom most surfaces are above the IRF level. We will construct dirt ramps on each side for access. The only portion of the units that will be in the floodway will be the end supports. The up stream side of these ramps will be protected by rip rap to protect them from erosion, as required in the Zoning Ordinance. Another option will be to remove these units before a flood occurs. They are integral units so, we would hook on to them with a bulldozer and drag them back to high ground if necessary. 5 . The gravel piles will remain in their present location on the northern part of the property. In this area they will not be affected by direct flows from a flood. Remember that this material is native to the flood plane. None of the heavier material will leave the site. 05/05/00 FRI 05:21 FAX 3036650165 T1efe3. Enterprises. Ir ?op— ' i' \` �) / f/. / i / il .....----- i I// C_) Ot / ...,.J. ✓ to -.�-/" _,,,./ O - ,( od50 / a __ ' 7 —/ •/ %! "�' //�\_..-.0900 ^., , ' • \ ,\.rte` �f \ 1 ' + • •'� s — >�� 6 C R,.E .eoo, K �- 3 :.—ter-- =.- �, a �;YS � / _. .:• •tt( -7 1311 - I v ,i - -_•" '= ` • j a `ate :x__. ~CHwrdCE•\¢4829 !,•. ti 3813 • • • ,9 '� 3,1.------��` 48 r'. � /,% - ,9off / '� ... I ,fly : J 4-� /•n . J1. /.. . :3B W �� I Off,' , lr ; '/i •.,859 . - II,_ :.. v �_ e I� 4r50 ' • 1 -.� GnVe�Pd9C- • / "i " Exh%6it B - Index Ma ,. ,11 1 ,, ,,y--�., .. ✓ 2 ) 12,1 ✓ H I-BAR-B, INC. - BAILEY Map ° ` J. ;"�� \ ' \ \� Pa�tt a6 the SW/4 NE/4, and eat 06 �\ '� � ; the SE/4 NE/4, MV/4 SE/4, s�W/4 C. /' '^ i sE/4, and -the SE/4 SE/4, Sec. 36, 3 / I ' � i`•`� 1 T3N, R68W, 6th P.M., WeCd County i_ . t Jam-; I3 I �tp7 II 1151110 FRI 05:21 FAX 3036650165 Tiefel Enterprises. Ir C' nu- 7 Yc a 1 r. ;fir e ..se.. ,ll'A }, 4 • $. %,6^� j .''f. e•:., lf` t' 12 t ly , N4 .r.,pcc�If +}s J w . • :w--ir w• • sAr i i..1 sii. yr 31.- l 9�. , _ ., Y� i , .b ' �_ � c;�'g �jAll� � u'►/ ,�/,. �AtF ��..�r 1<} 1),I-,i .y} r ?< tyr •SI� '� 1:' , S�i ��?.,�.�3i !/ 3�, ` �,�ti 1a' � ��k�t y¢v ��r� "[• Yyl( 1 x i•r Yf I� £ ,1 •, -� , 7>' �+. yij▪ .rL Y!`N �rt,I •!�n Ln r.vk�+t ofA9w„, ;, 1„ ��+�' r ti ' �'�J<J1I1_. `1�s/A t- ro-_ + r u M� }.. k.�:"� '�'f,,.' �'�5,�' 1 ` t �;.,., „;,,:s.-05t ,I I� •�`. .{_` Jill,- -s- tr3" /...�i. _ , C; r _ 3! 1 (q'yt�`p�•� 1. iv r Ktr f• 1 tii 'lam � �� r f yy 1 01 J • . Th,„., I� • [ *it..f �r''3"—'� \ , i /er. A: , � i• t // I r Ca-. . '�l�,y, a �, <. ., rt.� 41111 A'.itc • �/ SJ"� r � "••• .•4 , ' AfM1}� t• t3Or.A41 .��4.24 1 401. }r A"'r d h �r 11 rS1r x.. \ •♦ l Fti-• ] • ` ,.�y �• ',sn�. yv_fl v,dt r'-'-,:,y�, jq:;- St--,., y�be f �i �y', q is * \:r * •�� ti • •1i : •j `}4P. �I} at3" �,, ,,,,k"' fi `b� - )pa±. I r :. `al?,3..i >� .�i �lt R7_ S� 1 '' \ I }J}1,w,t`r 4(`- � �,� � � ' eQi , ern,t �l rlt' t 1441. ICr . ri/ � • iC�� i. J r 1 f. �� i �( �r,� .�t � 'SC, IY F S .. {�.t 4: `�- t j . , <. .�. j 'J"'..,L`J $ h 41,.:-.* d+. ' \ (- sr .� Y '� S Yom.. t ,� ��' k^Ttre.I ?,/ry ra;. �. �V�- .4.-,. ,7-', .''' Y4 y_r� r.' ` " � i�11y 'o?� 3 p r y t / f /., ]q { t. .7yAn,��""'" ` fry err ,�� 'Y ' '✓ • rh ` t w 14vc4; t r. , tit`.!// d: :.n ``�. F 1ac• y... . r •IcS•� -4 + i i,, �', .,. « .ip ±'µ it jl '!' �. �if( •,( ��.M77yy I��^�7Jy t•• r I �d�'l ,I L'r\` i •` 1 sit q(`�Jy � _ 11. �liJ i 7 •{p! r t M1A. f Y <�_�!4yyt• �_,r1 T� > •'.4. 4 . I� • i � � r7'.7! • a III 'F {• • r1 ih r'j cc��' p� r ! `4r ]S ir. L k.� t v, d ir,�r�nrtt. /rg •21erc i mss'' .:. Vii'_,1y ��' .C ,i Lt a '.--, r r d -Py' ti k r ' , 4 • a�g� q 'j/ c ,,.�' „�. � �'' 1�r.� .,*ir•.. �, 1• /�.• �•.ti.�A �A V `� f S I • 'cN �.p .{ �}Y� . , � v - lutrl J �.4. _e �• :, L ztv,•.T fi r)t �:.+V r. ittfl-f r •f,�r. ! , �:,,�_�, , I �Sr W17 ' ' �s -..1 L'I.1 , tT;js,,>.iL'.jL r ! ��444 ill •`" eilL ,r,f4'%r ,� .,,r�* .� u- if �1 i y• fk a l,.1r *:'',::: :-:-:;e:' t l� :-:-:;' k� : a r"�'" ?�I .,�' '� a I �11 0 � `a Y `ry rY t , . t � V ti pit s i y'4 p 1 ,1 r ' u 1 ,r M1 k t� t �k tJ i ' ' r k t !.I ;,;,,,,11,,.'"1,1t1/4• . . f-. mar, >05 1u ti,.,.,',..,s, t S lrr , ry\ . d 4 1.. �! t ` ,•-::.,,t ^ I I_• :.₹'G[�}'.J�j ;II e. "V:,l•)-(k.a- • I I f 1C it L S 1 it 1 1..A S'S . ..� f 1 . Vg{f^ (I d� "11� " �' +t •-..-24,,,,,,,• � o rG -Ir l b ,c'..� c li f aw: 1 oz.:-JI:>> .L . r'Iv t7� _ kl , MY 'a r,� tttys , l .I �♦ P t ,rT y , k t .v;ff ,l , �.1i %ItcF; /�,; IylR y�iY r .. �rvl St tLc.: NVI . ...dam , '� It� - O�irit <lr��:i- 1• ` + ` Va,,fr r � I r t )9, f u "i 'f 1 r t,:Pl t' '., Irk, $?•'tI ;-::..:1„,..- w if:;,..ii t 4: t t �_• ��., ]k 'Lr 1 1 r f F} - M1�tl r • >!� ro !n _ t l,1 .) i w �t 4Rt Cr q,g�P, ;� sly b Y. t hj I�. (� i tt rt ,Y,� 1 i • Y74 t �.•A� •' i:. if,,y.:. �i -4,,4, .6.4 . t1.7� '� r 11``a� �i 4M1t• J"qr ..J r ` r t rV •It�rN\? 1 •1 i ' J �J1 ' � 1•4';'15..",;,b; 1�� rill 'M1f k"N rp�fN':• r�alI t I/1 ,4 r.oi. S + .V( i),1*,;! ,I f l ti 't ((° Rl,,,s>.‘":",',r 1f iv ,X 4 a ' 'Witt—I ' 1. ., f { � "L87 .7 Fy1 of, ,F `% t,3< 3 t' 0. i� 1) t f rt N4I �a q cia 'C 4.T5lti y •t -i,�1 �C, tisrr3I x. 4 , t) , .r t+; r t'^ YvCVl' ." CU43 ti « Ali P • h S r \� r silo-, Ii I n +'qy f, w rtin. ♦ q 1� > ,1 t '? , ;_ w f ° a, t nI rc 1.': ` rYrt'' d 'I It n � C i a /tr �� I j ` it,c.;'.; I "� � 4--1--"...--C.,- ) `-may lA'4.'d �, 44., -iA,1:!.,,,±1,0"-, •I' }� , 1, e �`'y�i�[x '' r 'i. L ;rIu r ' II I ','• rt?`. 9 f.c:'4. L v ,- t;.::,:c; Y;4.; BHT}L )S1. 4 „L , ti fl+ ( gl;tl `Y •' t ,�I,I !i ri:Z V7LM1e l r I 1 51' s .: '�:?- • S l.'„ .r.r-1.. S j, a r L.ay, xq,� ` �' 'a ■ L �- S1..:r� PffU ..rte.. • TECTONIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. • FLOOD PLANE MAP Source of sheets 7 a 8 of 10, Colorado Water Consen'Rrinn an..! ' 0 v1 0 C" 0 w w ee '1 i+d u GARAGE DOORS atNOQsiktr 0 yZnt • FLDODPROOFING OPENING 4809.28 IRF LEVEL Tr CONCRETE SLAB J° �/ - 1-1 r-� 7 ' .._ 4805.78 FILL w m SOUTH SIDE VIEW WEST SIDE VIEW 4803 ORIGINAL GRADE NOTES: 1 . THERE WILL BE TWO FL000PROOFING OPENINGS ON THE EAST SIDE AND P-4 TWO OPENINGS ON THE WEST SIDE. THE TOTAL OPENING AREA IS 1082 50.. IN.'S 2. FL000PROOFING OPENING COVERS WILL AUTOMATICALLY OPEN AND CLOSE TO ALLOW WATER TO ENTER AND EXIT, CARE WILL BE TAKES SO THEY DO NOT BECOME BLOCKED. 3. ALF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL UNITS WILL BE PLACED AT LEAST ONE POD? ARDVE THE IRF LEVEL. 4. ALL FUELS, LUBRICANTS AND CHEMICALS WILL BE STORED ABOVE THE GARAGE PLAN VIEW IRF LEVEL. SKETCH MAP ; . iHC IAbLtS With GROUND ANCHORS WILL BE USED TO TIE THE BOLDING DOWN TO PREVENT LATERAL MOVEMENT. NO SCALE DATE: 1/21/90 0 GI 0 .71 O O1 N U /\ ASS co O ca co • `g J---___ 4809 IRF LEVEL o CO 4804CJI BRIDGE PIERS RIVER y f.. m m r ' -r CONVEYOR BRIDGE ^ `--nr' I' V , i 9% i I 1) i ts CONVEYOR BELT i CC 1 - ID m ACCESS RAMP 1 VEHICLE BRIDGE s ) t ACCESS RAMP i I ( i J i NOTES: I . LOWEST PART OF BRIDGES WILL BE ONE FOOT ABOVE THE INTER MEDIATE REGIONAL FLOOD (IAP) LEVEL. CONVEYOR AND BRIDGE CROSSING 2. BRIDGES ARE SINGLE SPAN. SELF CONTAINED tUNTTS. cKt•m!'A Na D o NO SCALE DATE: 1/21/90 — • 0 01 0 0. LIST OF MATERIALS a WALL STUD z 2 - 0.5" X 32" Black pipe " - -7 threaded both ends 4 - 0.5" Threaded couplers r.) 4 - Large washers I - 2 - 2" X 4" a 38" Wood end spacers w TOP BRACE 1 - 2" X 4" a 22.5 Wood top brace c, 2 - self opening covers 0 W m m 0 w cn i m UCD I-, i-b CD BLACK PIPE cao r co f THREADED COUPLER r r m IT 1 CD SILL PLATE , -- 4" CONCRETE FLOOR FLOODPROOFING OPENINGS PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1"=4" DATE: 1/21/90 05/05/00 FRI 05:23 FAX 3036650165 Tlefel Enterprises. Ir 012 WELD COUNTY . FLOOD HAZARD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION Name of Applicant Tectonic Construction CO. _ Date 1/7,4{/90__ Address 12501 W.C.R 13, Longmont, CO - - -- Home Phone Work Phone (303) 444-7444 Legal Description of the Property See Improvement Certificate Attached Zoning District Agriculture Total Acreage 216.81 1. General Description of Proposed Development: (Check when applicable) Manufactured Home or Residential Non-Residential Mobile Home ❑ New Construction ® New Construction 0 On Single Lot ❑ Addition or 0 Addition or 0 In Mobile home Improvements Improvements Park ❑ In Subdivision 0 Fill Material 0 Fill Material Fill Material 0 Watercourse Alteration 0 In Mobile Home • -7 Subdivision [-A Other Bridge/Conveyor Crossing and Gravel Stockpiles 2. Brief Narrative Description of Proposed Development: Bring into compliance a Garage Building by ret p ittin� floodnroofipg units, iptruction of a tempgpary bridge/conveyor structure across the �rivcls. Addition of the gravel stocicpiles. 3. Property located in designated FW (Floodway) District? Yes No X IF ANSWERED YES, CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT THE PROPOSED USE OR STRUCTURE, WHEN BUILT, WILL NOT CAUSE ANY INCREASE IN FLOODWATER LEVELS DURING AN INTERMEDIATE REGIONAL FLOOD (100-YEAR FLOOD) OR WILL LIMIT OR RESTRICT THE FLOW CAPACITY OF THE FLOODWAY. 4. Property located in a designated FP-1 or FP-2 (Floodprone) District? Yes X No 05/05/00 FRI 05:24 FAX 5006650165 T1efel Elnterprises, Ir .1010 FLOOD HAZARD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CERTIFICATION I certify that the following standards have been met: Check applicable sections only The lowest floor, including the basement floor, is elevated (for existing structures which are being substantially improved) or will be built (for new structures) to the level, or above, of the regulatory flood datum. Water Surface Elevation of the Intermediate Regional Flood is:______ feet above MSL at the building site. Elevation of the lowest floor of the proposed structure is .__`.... feet above MSL at the building site. The mobile home pad is elevated (for existing structures which are being substantially improved) or will be built (for new structures) to the level, or above, of the regulatory flood datum. Water Surface Elevation of the Intermediate Regional Flood is:__�� feet above MSL at the building site. Elevation of the mobile home pad is feet above MSL at the building site. Source of Information: Structures which are not elevated in order to be floodproofed are designed so the structure is watertight below the elevation of the regulatory flood datum and the structures are designed to be capable of resisting the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces expected at the building site during an intermediate regional flood. Water Surface Elevation of the Intermediate Regional flood is: 4809.28 feet above HSL at the building site. Water Surface Elevation to which structure is to be floodproofed and watertight: feet above MSL at the building site. Source of Information: Colorado Water Conserntion_Board Maps 1/8,8 of LQ _ for the St. Vrane River. All new or replacement domestic water wells or water supply, treatment, or storage systems are designed to prevent inundation or infiltration of floodwater into the system by an intermediate regional flood. All new or replacement sanitary sewer systems are designed to prevent inundation or infiltration of floodwater into the system and to prevent discharges from the systems into the floodwater of an intermediate regional flood. 05/05/00 FRI 05:24 FAX 3036650165 Tiefel Enterprise , Ir- ni Flood Hazard Development 'Permit Certification Page 2 ; • _ x The encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of an Intermediate Regional Flood. _ x Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air—conditioning equipment and other service facilities will be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating : within the components during conditions of flooding. _ x All new construction and substantial improvements will be constructed tieing methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Improvements will be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage.' _ X All new construction and substantial improvements will be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and to withstand hydrodynamic loads. _ The proposed use or structure is to be located in the FW (Floodway) District, and when built will not cause any increase in floodwater levels during an Intermediate Regional Flood and will not limit or restrict the flow capacity of the floodway. _X Fill material will be used in the FP-1 or 'FF-2 (Floodprone) Districts, and the fill material is designed to withstand the erosional forces associated with an Intermediate Regional Flood. The use or development causes or results in an alteration or relocation of a water course. Evidence is attached to this certification that; 1. Municipalities within a three—mile radius of the proposed alteration or relocation have been notified in writing of the proposed alteration or relocation. 2. The Colorado Water Conservation Board has been notified in writing of the proposed alteration or relocation. 3. The Office of Insurance and Mitigation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency has been notified in writing of the proposed alteration or relocation. 05/05/00 FRI 05:24 FAX 3036650165 Tiefel Enterprises Tr-. P015 1°]ood Hazard Development lermit Certification Page _ ^ The flood; carrying capacity within the altered or relocated po4Lion of the wntercource will remain the same after the alteration or relocation as existed prior to the alteration or relocation. Evidence is attached which substantiates that the alteration or relocation shall nor adversely effect landowners upstream or downstream from the alteration or relocation. XV ! tiC -t ti 9 _/ Property Owner „aa :,, : Gates VII V 4� I,, - Registered Professional Engler State of Colorado • Date: c -t r ci • • • • • • • • • • Anne Johnson - MUD Expansion for Properties on WCR 13 age 1 From: Arthur L Elmquist <aelmquist@juno.com> To: <ajohnson@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/17/00 11:06AM Subject: MUD Expansion for Properties on WCR 13 Hi Anne, How's your summer going? Would you please see that all of the members of the Weld County Planning Commission receive a copy of the attached letter concerning the MUD expansion requests. I believe these requests will be on this week's agenda. Thank You, Artie Elmquist St. Vrain Concerned Citizens Anne Johnson - SVWCR13MUD wpd P ae 1 V. _...St. Vrain Concerned Citizens aiZ4 I-ID rrontage Ka. t Longmont, CO 80504 Phone - (303) 776-4449 Fax - (954) 212-7996 E-Mail - aelmquist@netscape.net Monica Daniels Mika, Director Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 1? Avenue Greeley, CO 806031 RE: Requests for inclusion of land in MUD Area of two parcels. [J Bar B, Inc West of CR 13 & north of CR 26] and [R & M Land Co. -Rademacher- West of CR 13 & south of CR 2f]. Dear Monica, Ordinance 191 Section 1. I Intent of the MUD area states: "The presence of an interstate highway and state highway system and the external growth pressures from the Longmont Metropolitan area have added to interest in land development and population growth in the area". One fallac:_: in this intent is that, based on Weld County's dedication to the preservation of its agricultural lands and economy, county urbanization should only be tolerated based on need, not land owners' or developers' "interest" in development or population growth. Another fallacy is that these parcels are not subject to Longmont growth pressures [6 miles away] or from 1-25 [2 miles away]. Less than 5% of the MUD Area land has beer developed to date. The balance should ha infilled before considering adding more land to the MUD Area. There are no growth pressures on these parcels to warrant their being included in the MUD Area. Any pressures can easily ha absorbed by vacant areas in the existing MUD area or preferably [ref Municipal Annexntio� Code] in surrounding municipalities. The only pressures on these lands are from the desira ter profits from development. The MUD Area has already been recently increased with the inclusion of the Douthit and Hamlin properties. Is the MUD Area to be continuously increased base) solely on the desire of land owners rather than any need for their development and further reducing the amount of available farm land. These lands are actually prime farmlands based on their soils and availability of water. Only a lapse in the USDA criteria which designates any lands lying in a flood plain as being "ahers prevents their proper classification. One of the reasons, unstated in Ordinance 191, for crecticn of the original MUD Area was to make it feasible for the formation of a sewer district so that t1 e businesses at Del Camino would not have to rely on individual septic systems to handle waste. As servicing 11.e existing Del Camino businesses alone would not support a central sewer service additional lands were included. Now, the St. Vrain Sanitation District is having to increase its capacity to serve the area growth. Thus, today, inclusion of additional lands in the MUD Area is not necessary o make the sewer district economically sustainable. The J Bar B Land is in J 00 year flood alait. Anne Johnson - SVWCR13MUD wpd ige 2 Mud land use map calls for "lowest intensity" development min the flood plain. There is presented no documentation that there are adequately sized water mains to serve development it these lands. Part of the J Bar J lands were formerly wetlands before mining took place Development of these lands and the use of the lakes for water sports, etc. will prevent their beint reclaimed for wetlands. There should at least be input from the U S Army Corps of Engineers Colorado Division of Minerals & Geology and Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board bed' making any decisions regarding this application. The presentations as to the intended type of development are not formal proposals for change o zone, etc. We draw your attention to an example of variances between alleged intent at time o request for inclusion in MUD Area and subsequent actual applications to the County for actua development. Glen Douthit was reported in the Times Call as stating that inclusion of hb. property in the MUD Area would be for the befit of his heirs developing the property. de is -.ov in the process of seeking County approval for development. Additionally, the present plan i:, to• a more intense and dense use of the land than was originally proposed Sincerely, Artie Elmquist, Representative St.Vrain Concerned Citizens Hello