HomeMy WebLinkAbout20001724.tiff MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Gathman, W.C. Planning DATE: June 23, 2000
FROM: Pam Smith, Weld County Department of Public Health and
Environment
CASE NO.: S-534 NAME: Shawn & Paula Petersburg
The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. We have also observed the site.
The application has satisfied PUD Ordinance No. 197 in regard to water and sewer service. Water
will be provided by Left Hand Water District and sewer will be provided by individual sewage
disposal systems. The minimum proposed lot size of 11.89 acres coupled with the overall density
of one septic system per 15 acres meets current Department policy. There were commitment
letters from Left Hand Water District in the application materials.
The Department recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Water service shall be obtained from the Left Hand Water District .
2. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for each proposed septic system and shall be
nstalled according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations.
3. Each septic system shall be designed for site-specific conditions, including but not limited to
maximum seasonal high groundwater, poor soils, and shallow bedrock.
If you have any questions, please call me at extension 2211.
M-'.PAM,Planning\FlnalPlat\s534 wpd
nigan
2006-1724
rece
° MEMORANDUM
C unty Planning Dep,
TO: Chris Gathman DATE: June 12, 2000
'De
JIiN 1 Z2000
FROM: Diane Houghtaling RE., Traffic Engineer
IEDECT: S-534: Petersburg Minor Subdivision
COLORADO .
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this subdivision's Final Plat request
STANDARD COMMENTS:
❑ External Roadways:WCR 10 is shown as a local gravel road in the Weld County Comprehensi in F .in.
The plat reflects the required 60 feet of right-of-way.
❑ Internal Roadway: All lots within a new subdivision shall be served by a the internal roaii lie
minimum width for paved roads, maintained by the County is 24' traveled way with 4' :;t 3bill aed
shoulders. All internal roads will have 60 feet of right-of-way. Special care should be taken w.th hie
widths of fire access and on curves. The intersection of the internal street and WCR 10 shall h€ at '.
Cul-de-sacs shall have a 65' right-of-way radius with a 50' edge of traveled way radius.
j)4'1 Drainage: A storm water report was/was not submitted at the Sketch Plan. It shall be amended s,ld
resubmitted to include culvert sizing for the ditch crossing.
❑ Traffic: The three residential lots will have little impact on the adjacent roadway system except in hie
area of dust. The submittal states that there are fifteen existing homes on this road. The additicral v%o
homes will bring this road close to the 200vph maximum before dust control is required. This site ins
within the SW impact area but WCR 10 is not planned for pavement in that study.
❑ Landscaping: No plants over 3 feet will be allowed in the intersection sight distance triangle
❑ Utility Easements: Utility easements will be required around the internal street and the lots. A
• RECOMMENDATION: Approval
DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS:
r
The existing two access drives on WCR 10 shall be closed and lot 3 will use the internal roecwa tor
access.
A cul-de-sac designed to County standards be provided at the end of the internal road.
The right-of-way for the road be dedicated to the County.
The drainage study be amended to include calculations of the ditch crossing culvert.
Approval be obtained from the ditch company to cross the ditch with the road.
A street name sign and stop sign will be provided at the end of the internal roadway.
If you have any questions, please call EXHIBIT
P.C.: S-534
m:\wPFILES\diane\S-534.wpd
1
H ii 7 ‘: :/:i-� 1 i _ f
Mn. If
Weld County Planning Dep, . . -
eilt , -I4 '
1 .ilM 08 2000
Weld County Referral
RECEIVED
IlliC. May 23, 2000
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Shawn and Paula Petersburg Case Number S-534
Please Reply By June 13, 2000 Planner Chris Gathman
Project 3-Lot Minor Subdivision Final Plat
Legal Part of the SE4 of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,
Weld County, Colorado.
Location North of and adjacent to WCR 10, 1/2 mile east of WCR 5
Parcel Number 1467 09 000050 / 51
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation ,iou
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date ma be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) July 6, 2000
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
U We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature iCl Date (n ,_q-CI,(
Agency ,OR\ \d .ems'-. lc'1/4\ c'_ \_3-A < Ci—
e weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 t(970)304-6498 fax
EXHIBIT
I H
Mou"r"'N MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P Administrative Office:
9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501
c
� e (303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702
.'r
VIEW
June 7,2000
Mr. Chris Gathman
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley,CO 80631
Mr. Chris Gathman:
I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the Final Plat for the Petersburg 3-Lot Minor
Subdivision, located at approximately 2905 Weld County Road (Case Number: S-534, Case Name:
Petersburg). Based on my review, I have the following comments:
• The Fire District has no objections to the subdivision provided the requirements of Attachment I (Fire
District letter dated June 9, 1999)are met.
• Street intersections must be marked with signs showing the street name and address range. If standard
street signs are used, then the signs do not need to be submitted to the Fire District for approval If
non-standard street signs are used,the signs do need to be submitted to the Fire District for approval.
• Approved address numbers shall be placed on each residence, or on a free standing sign, in such a
position to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Address numbers or
letters shall contrast with their background.
• As soon as the final plat is approved, the applicant must provide to the Fire District an eight and one
half by eleven map of the subdivision showing the street configuration, street names,hydrant locations
and addresses of the lots if available.
Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that does not
comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the planning process,
should you have any questions,please contact me at(303)772-0710.
Sincerely,
LuAnn Penfold
Fire Marshal
LMP/Ip
cc: Paula& Shawn Petersburg,2509 Weld County Road 10, Erie, CO 80516
project file
file
Ip06,06.00
Station I Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 ,tatiot
9119 Only Line Hd 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P O.Boa 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 ' J Box.11
Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 1( '0 Forext 5'
80501 80504 Mead.CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie CO 80516 Da Ho CO eC5 n
Jun- 30-00 07 51A Mountain View Fire Protec 303 651 7702 P . 02
nOUNTqty MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
P P Administrative Office:
9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501
(303) 772-0710•FAX (303) 651.7702
June 29, 2000
Mr. Chris Gathman
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Mr. Chris Gathman:
I have met with Mr. Petersburg and again reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the Pinar
Plat for the Petersburg 3-Lot Minor Subdivision, located at approximately 2509 Weld Counts
Road (Case Number: 5-534). Historically, the Fire District had not approved of any subdivision
unless water supply for fire protection was provided. However, the Fire District has approved a
four lot recorded exemption within Weld County and a four lot minor subdivision in Dacono
without required water supply or installation of fire hydrants, provided all new residences built
on the lots affected by the recorded exemption or minor subdivision were protected with ar
automatic fire sprinkler system. The Fire District does not object to the subdivision anc
approves the subdivision as indicated on the plat in accordance with the following comments anti
stipulations:
• Fire apparatus access is accepted as indicated on the plat.
• Water supply for fire protection must be provided by hydrants located within 650 feet of new
residences as measured along the fire apparatus access road and around the exterior of the
residence. If the required fire flow is not available or if the owner wishes an alternative to
the installation of fire hydrants, the installation of a residential fire sprinkler system will he
accepted as an alternative to meeting the required fire flow.
• Street intersections must be marked with signs showing the street name and address range_
If standard street signs are used, then the signs do not need to be submitted to the Fire
District for approval. 1r non-standardstreet signs are used,the signs do need to be submitted
to the Fire District for approval.
• Approved address numbers shall be placed on each residence, or on a free standing sign, in
such a position to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property.
Address numbers or letters shall contrast with their background.
• As soon as the final plat is approved, the applicant must provide to the Fire District an eight
and one half inch by eleven inch map of the subdivision showing the street configurations,
street names, and addresses of the lots if available.
EXHIBIT
slation 1 Station 2 9tatbn a station 4 station 5 Seta • I
0113 Cnty Line no 10971 WCR 1a P.O.Pot 575 P.O.60,.11 10911 DOBBT Pon P.O. , r/Longmont.Cu Longmont.CO 299 Palmer Ave 0500 NwM Road L•fa
8050,1 00S04 Moan,CO 60592 W9a'CO 000 B
CONIwo1.CO 00541 Fria,80026 C
Jun--30-00 07 : 51A Mountain View Fire Protec 303 651 7702 P _ O1
Mr. Chris Cadman
June 29, 2000
Page Two
Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that does
not comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the
planning process, should you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 772-0710,
Sincerely,
LuAnn Penfold
Fire Marshal
LMP/Ip
cc: Paula& Shawn Petersburg, 2509 Weld County Road 10, Erie, CO 130516
project file
tale
'p0637 O0
•IIWeld County Referral
C.6-1). \. , L'H-H
Ma3I 23, 2000
COLO ' ADO •
•
The W:Id County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for r;eiilew:
,
H,
Appli.:nt Shawn and Paula Petersburg Case Number 5-534
Pleas Reply By June 13, 2000 Planner Chris Gathmt3i:,
—b-i •
Proles 3-Lot Minor Subdivision Final Plat
i
Legal Part of the SE4 of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 68 West df the 6th P M.,
Weld County, Colorado-
Locat..n North of and adjacent to WCR 10, %z mire east of WCR 5 I
Parc Number 1467 09 000050 / 51 1
Y....,..
The ap lication is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments'ior recommendation you
consid: relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above li4ted t to so that we may
give ful consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or r this date may be
deeme to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have akii'further questons
regard'; g the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld ounty Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) July 6, 2000
❑ have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Com;l rrehensive, Plrir
have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ .S - attached letter
^ n /
Comm• ts: (,,y.0u9l 11�d9,mino/ta_ /.iti/77\ 7 {�alleiriai3n`ts I`',� ma.rtainc,,
C r QnDNtel6 span e,U • `�,"' " t C_frni ° - iKI
d /°lavt• sa-P,9-t;0 itt.t. AmJd tIi 4 .
..„.“,..
Signa re (1141Pf di- — Date JrG?,L S
1 ,11
CI
Aden.S Ir. c -nrit)
4Wada C', unty Planning Dept. 41555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970) EXHIBIT
i ' 1
Z0/30 a9vd 3Id3 AO NMOl 99LZ9Z6EOE ST :TO eeNHZ/Lr149
St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J
395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499
303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343
June 7, 1999
Weld County Planning Dept.
JUN 22 1999
Eric Jerman
Weld County Department of Planning Services RECEIVED
1400 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, Co 80631
RE: Petersburg Minor Subdivision - Sketch Plan (Part of the SEt/4 of Sec. 9, T1N, R68)
Dear Eric:
Thank you for referring the Petersburg Minor Subdivision to the School District. The projected student impact
upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 2 new single-family lots on 45.7 acres is 1 student. Any students
living in this subdivision would attend Erie Elementary School and Erie Middle/Senior High School under the
present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development and other
existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future.
THIS PROPOSED DEVELOF 1995-99 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS*
Building Oct. 98 Student) Projected Over Total # of Total Cum. Over Cap W/
_ Capacity Enrollment Impac t Enrollment— Cap, Proj. Stdnts' Ignrollment 95-99 DIEM/Elementary 408 411 1 U 412 _ Yes 1 1 4O 1881 _ Yos (-9473)
ddle/Sr 1 349 328 0 328 No 1012 1 340 Yes ( 991)
[__ 1 L_ 2481 (SEATS VIAL.)
° O=®nod ®in p jacgool : a.aSeD ylaU S Bw (hoza zolb®all tePoov awao &w t
Ov®Pim ®M iampo8o& cdlaya0®pumawita (190E-17999)
The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a
student enrollment stand point. While this development does not impact the middle/senior school capacity, the
elementary is already over capacity. In addition, there are other approved developments in these attendance
areas which will, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools.
As the volume of developments increases in the Erie Elementary area with no alleviation of the existing
overcrowded conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided
students in other areas becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore, the District would oppose this development
because it adds to the enrollment of an already overcrowded school. Should this proposal be considered for
approval, the District would request the cooperation and participation of the developer and County in
implementing a separate agreement to help mitigate the impacts on the schools. This agreement would include
the calculation and payment of an appropriate cash in-lieu of land dedication fee to address the capacity
concerns at these schools (per the attached chart). Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
dcott Toilhon, AICP
Planning Specialist
"Excellence - Our Only Option"
Exhibit B School i .inning Petersburg Sketb.1 Plan
Standards And
Calcuiation of
In Lieu Fees
L
Single Family
§_chgol Planning ndards
Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed
Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in-lieu
Units Yield Standard - Acres Contribution Value Contribution
Elementary 2 0.35 525 10 0.01 $25,100
0.7
Middle Level 2 0.14 r 750 25 0.01 $25,100
n,25:1
High School 2 0.17 1200 40 0.01 $25,100
0.34
i
m
a
Total 1 .32 0.03 $25,100 $853 0
C a
c g
Single Family Student i is .66 $427, Per Unit v _o
-
G
'D
M ,P
00
a a
CD
6/14/99
Hello