The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20000252.tiff MEMORANDUM TO: Ben Patton DATE: October 20, 1999 Illik FROM:Sheble McConnellogue,Environmental Health Services COLORADO SUBJECT: Petersburg, Shawn CASE: Z-533 Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for a 3-Lot Minor Subdivision. The applicant stated the modular home on Lot 2 will be removed and another residence wil he built on Lot 2. The following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for the proposed home septic system(s) and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations 2. The existing septic system on Lot 2 shall be abandoned according to the Welc County I.S.D.S. Regulations. 3. The subdivision shall utilize the existing public water supply (Left Hand Water Distnc). sm/565 EXHIBIT 2000-0252 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Eric Jerman/Ben Patton, Planners DATE: November 5, 1999 "l ige FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator LQ e SUBJECT: Z-533: Shawn Petersburg, Change of Zone COLORADO Weld County Public Works has reviewed this proposal. This project falls primarily under the purview o-the held County Subdivision Ordinance 173-E (Minor Subdivision) Standards. Our comments and require merits are as follows: COMMENTS: The two metal structures within the public right-of-way need to be designated on the plat as non-.ontorminq or be removed. Please contact the Department of Planning Services regarding this matter. There are existing fences and overhead power poles within the public right-of-way. The fence sha I De relocated to the edge of the property line. REQUIREMENTS: Cul-de-Sac: The cul-de-sac at the north end of the property needs to be included within the 60-foot public right-of way to avoid a dead end road. Streets: Item #4.6.9.6 states all roads within a minor subdivision shall be a minimum of 18 feet wide and 'nave a minimum depth of four inches of aggregate base course. The applicant is identifying a proposed 1.-3-toot grave' driveway. Weld County Public Works will verify width and depth of aggregate base course. IExistinq Access: The applicant is identifying two existing accesses to WCR 10. Both accesses s hall be closed and the internal road system will be utilized to gain access to Lot 3. Summary: The roadway portion of this three-lot minor subdivision is being constructed between pc wer poles and property lines. I would recommend that a stop sign and road designation sign be placed at the entrance to the minor subdivision. I am also recommending a speed limit sign to attempt to control speed due to the physical obstructions adjacent to the entrance. cc: Z-533 planlz E 11199 EXHIBIT j (40 Weld County Refer ral C. October 14, 1999 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Shawn Petersburg Case Number Z-533 Please Reply By November 4, 1999 Planner Ben Patton Project Change of Zone for a 3-Lot Minor Subdivision. Legal SE4 of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to WCR 5; North of and adjacent to WCR 10. —f: Parcel Number 1467 09 000050/51 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may he deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 7, 1999 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive PI 3n O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature b. .„, -' Date \t_\°\_u\\ Agency MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRI1.i veld County P' 9119 County line (toad Longmont, CO 80501 OCT i T 4Weld County Planning Depj,,,y ?56N. ]iY OveiCT€ft`b t5116B6 f°*4m53-6100 ext.3540 • (970)304-6498 fax ,�JJUU �i�t LL vFax (303)u 651.7702 R.F pow I *O TA'" MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT a Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702 VIEW October 19, 1999 Mr. Ben Patton Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17°i Avenue Greeley, CO 80616 RE: Case Number: Z-533 Petersburg Minor Subdivision Change of Zoning Dear Mr. Patton: I have the reviewed the submitted materials for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the Fire District. The project is within the boundaries of the District and will receive service from the District. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The Fire District has no objections to the change of zoning. The requirement; of the Fire District for the subdivision are outlined in a letter to you, dated 1/27/99. This letter is included in the change of zoning packet as Attachment B. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: Shawn Petersburg Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 station 1 9119 Cnty Line Rd 19971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 PO Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.0.Box 666 KO Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 101 So.Forest fa 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 fa! mo.CO 9061 I St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499 303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343 June 7, 1999 Weld County Planning Dept. JUN 22 1999 Eric Jerman Weld County Department of Planning Services RECEIVED 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Co 80631 RE: Petersburg Minor Subdivision - Sketch Plan (Part of the SE1/4 of Sec. 9, T1N, R68) Dear Eric: Thank you for referring the Petersburg Minor Subdivision to the School District. The projected student impact upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 2 new single-family lots on 45.7 acres is 1 student. Any students Hiving in this subdivision would attend Erie Elementary School and Erie Middle/Senior High School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development and other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOIg1995-99 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS* Building Oct. 98 Student Pro ected Over Total * of Total Cum.. Over Cap W7/ meat L oast ags_ S4dn4s' ynrollmen4i 95 99 Dav Elementary Ca40081ty Enr41 1 ent m 1 Enr41I2 Yes Prot. 4 6 © 1 881 Yes (-1473) - Middle/Sr i 349 328 0 328 I No 1012 1340 rtes (-991` 1 1 1 2481 (EE ATs ,A°/A"V1..) • Eito4d an projagoitaad oPMdow6' yila dlo gff9 P0vono @Snll ®PPoondsnog, divccs flvomm rsi00 Nona mod Swag opuv llv x (V920'4 229) The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment stand point. While this development does not impact the middle/senior school capacity, the elementary is already over capacity. In addition, there are other approved developments in these attendance areas which will, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools. As the volume of developments increases in the Erie Elementary area with no alleviation of the existing overcrowded conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided students in other areas becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore, the District would oppose this development because it adds to the enrollment of an already overcrowded school. Should this proposal be considered for approval, the District would request the cooperation and participation of the developer and County in implementing a separate agreement to help mitigate the impacts on the schools. This agreemen would include the calculation and payment of an appropriate cash in-lieu of land dedication fee to address the capacity concerns at these schools (per the attached chart). Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, l'ill cott Toillion, AICP Planning Specialist "Excellence - Our Only Option" Exhibit 13 School Planning Petersburg Sketch Plan Standards And Calculation of In Lieu Fees Single Family ! — i School Planning Standards� Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed Of Student Facility i Standard ! Land Land Cash-in-lieu Units _4 Yield Standard J Acres Contribution Value Contribution Elementary _ 2 0.35 525 10 0.01 $25,100 _ ! 0.7 Middle Level 2 0.14 750 25 0.01 $25,100 0.28 --t- I High School 2 0.17 1200 40 0.01 $25,100 0.34 I i i i Total 1 .32 } 0.03 $25,100 $853 73 a o C .. Single Family Student Yield d i_s_.66 �_ I ; $427 1T1 iv -c I Per Unit ..,, N v C 78 W 7 rci a t 0 ro 6/14/99 Hello