The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20011868.tiff CAROL Harding Asphalt Specialties Co., Inc. Docket#2001-40 Page 1 From: "John R. Dent Law Office" <dentlaw@gwest.net> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 6/28/01 2:17PM . Subject: Asphalt Specialties Co., Inc. Docket#2001-40 To Whom It May Concern: We are opposed to the application of Asphalt Specialty's Company Inc. under docket number 2H01-40 scheduled for hearing with the County Commissioner on July 11, 2001. We oppose this proposed request for use by Special Review because of the impact on the roads and existing traffic on W.C.R. 27, W.C.R. 6 and W.C.R. 8. This is not a viable location for a user with the volume of truck traffic indicated. This use would create further congestion, increase traffic accidents at the intersections of Road 6 and 8 with Hwy. 85, and destroy the existing roads. Sincerely, John R. and Helen Dent 444 Monta Vista Ct. Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-4667 EXHIBIT o u512#j3 2001-1868 CAROL Harding -Asphalt plant Page 1 1..J From: <JHuett1946@aol.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 6/27/01 5:40PM Subject: Asphalt plant i I am writing to express my concern about the proposed asphalt plant to be located between WCR6 and WCR8 on WCR27. We recently completed a new home less than two miles from this proposed site and we strong oppose an asphalt plant being placed there. Our concerns include but are not limited to; contamination of ground water, excessive traffic on RD8 and R27 which is already overloaded, offensive odor. Ours is a farming community and we feel this would lower property values and ruin our community. Joyce and Richard Huett 13749 WCR 8 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 4. EXHIBIT use*l3ay RCAROL Harding asphalt plant Page i From: <CAJ46@aol.com> To: <CHARDING@CO.WELD.CO.US> , Date: 6/29/01 8:32AM "j `•: =u Subject: asphalt plant I strongly oppose the asphalt plant on weld rd. 27 and 6. The traffic is bad on 27 right now and with the proposed plant of 320 trucks a day we'll never be able to get on the road. We have a lot of senior citizens who travel that road because hwy 85 is to busy and moves to fast for them. I drove the road the other day and Ritchie Bros. had a sale and cars we're parked along both sides for 2 miles. Don't we have enough congestion? If you want to put the plant in weld county why not put it on road 16 north and east of the town in the industrial park?Wasn't that zoned for this type of business? Charlotte Jones 13611 Rd. 10 Ft. Lupton, Colo. 80621 EXHfdl7 t2SC#/3y July 3,2001 Mr.Rob Madsen,Weld County Commissioner . —6 °: 5 4 Centennial Center, 915 10th Street P.O.Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Mr. Commissioner: Please accept this letter as an ANGRY PROTEST to the consideration: TO: Build an Asphalt and Concrete Processing Facility andPlant on County Road#27 (Old Hwy 85) south of Fort Lupton. It has been stated that 320 Trucks will be using this road each day This is Unbelievable!!! For someone to think he can add another 320 Trucks A Day to this road, he must be out of his mind. With the present traffic on this road as heavy as it is already: 1. With Fort Lupton School Buses and Children waiting and using this road in and out of school two times a day or more. 2. With all the cattle feeding trucks and vehicles moving cattle and feed to and from a large feed lot (more than 1000 head),next to the Asphalt and Concrete Proposal. 3. With all the Halliburton Oil Trucks and Pickups next to this proposal and BJ Oil Services Trucks and Vehicles using this road day and night. 4. With all the vegetable fanning trucks_farming equipment and field workers using this road to farm and transport their crops. (Vegetable Fanners for example: Sokoto,Villano, Sasaki, Watada are just a few farmers fanning the land.) 5. With Weld County Road#27(Old Hwy 85)being the Only Road coining out of or going into the South End of Fort Lupton for people working and shopping in Denver,Brighton and wherever. (Presently Colorado State Patrol will tell you it is the heaviest traveled north and south road in South Weld County already! The State Patrol works this road all the time) 6. With all the people living in the farm area south and east of US Hwy 85 trying to get to work or get to town to met their ne its,they m ct rav 1 or cro c W ld o,nty Road#27 each time. 7. With all the environmental problems that come with this proposal (Dust,Noise, Smell,Odor,Traffic, Traffic Injuries,Underground Problems,Dumping Problems, Safety Regulations). THERE IS NO WAY SOMEONE CAN ADD ANOTHER 320 TRUCKS A DAY TO THIS AND CALL IT A SAFE SUCCESS! THIS PROPOSAL SHOULD BE DENIED AND SENT BACK TO ADAMS COUNTY WHERE IT CAME FROM I REQUEST YOUR CONSIDERATION AND DENIAL OF THE ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PROPOSAL ON ROAD#27, SOUTH OF FORT LUPTON. LET'S KEEP WELD COUNTY A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN LIVE. Thank You, Floyd E. ere 930 South ulton ve. Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Telephone 1-303-857-2458 EXHIBIT Resident of Fort Lupton-36 years I a loot" CAROL Harding Asphalt Specialties sand and gravel plant Page 1 From: <LMccam7831@aol.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/8/01 7:54PM Subject: Asphalt Specialties sand and gravel plant I ,I I am sending this email to register my disagreement with the proposed sand L YI and gravel plant to be located between WCR 6 and WCR 18. i Ft, Lupton does not need to have this plant located near the city. The increased truck traffic will prove to be a detriment to our city and to our quality of life. We have a serious traffic problem now. Adding the additional truck traffic will create a problem that we will not be able to C7 aaa overcome easily. I travel a lot on Colorado roads and know how some of these truck drivers operate their trucks. I know for a fact that they will look for the easiest and fastest way to and from the plant. I am sure they will start going through residential areas just to avoid the congestion we are experiencing now. The City of Ft. Lupton and Weld County needs to encourage businesses to locate here but we need to look at"clean" industries. Not one which will generate noise, air and traffic pollution. Both governments should look toward the technology section. They should promote our location as being perfectly placed to attract businesses that do business in the Denver, Boulder and Greeley municipalities. Again, I am against this plant. Thank you, Larry McCammon 145 W. Hill Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 4 EXHIBIT S CAROL Harding petition Page 1of2 Page 1 .� am_ From: "Diane Jewell"<Daughter_one@worldnet.att.net> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/9/01 6:01 AM Subject: petition Page 1of2 _ EXyH'IBIT l Use:1h 3.14 CAROL Harding - SGT6371.JPG Page•-::,:..�.`—c".w,......;�•�.:.4::.:; sss r:•:' . :₹il?ef :.,y,: sa ;t •• '} .. .. • , 7• • rr!'':�Et {•.._>`' 7 k{' wu. ,�'" t' k' ! •' r os - ift , -- '0411a4 peseern . wen tIsnp pug off 1404 tao*nped eeoBratti -s9"AAl .j p1-le 9'9'Mr`.�t.11i11" C*tiectuP ogisu lepol U)?+ts asapatui S Pus 9 10001ti Kts. 11'04119Ituacex r o;(asIutnod :4q prm,aJCI:it ICAJ iF.Fnt aayt e 'fitlnt ems{;dedw lyemstfieu gtln'wok!MUMS AA *WI pesrxfO;d sxt4 ae,.:44fa< -3m lop sed 1:sncq fb uorialstio stq}socKi a(4 *01:v p >i0" sad Oitep ?3 'p'd 004t o} 1141 0019 we st suotleteth NAV' �M7 --- ;_J mop)* dump tuapuet `ea+epta;t to a) A kac! sX3 ►f tnE of smea34a MOO' :Wm trstunt Lz# :1m ttfii?-47i VOKI jutttd tu$tuu-; pue uLtusv UV )010,4Ai1}I,ZC V,'.::., el4t usndtky s1410' pcte ssa,{etl*PS cztuayxssi yF�y mss q{ aats p,utits*P rt a.I CC N3341.110 3o 1.$113 too 49949 Aim PP") 'acf IMA► ZSIZu. tv Ilerld M rilliffrall O1 tiOUNOdaa art t its3a CAROB ing- T4ll SGOA5.JPG PiNe 1 Hard PETITION IN OPPOSmON TO A$PkU T AND CEMENT PLANT _% AT 2292 W.C.R, 827, (&d Hwy MR ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 8. AND S —1 - rs". The undersigned, treig born,beta residents.iaaitpayi3rs and vo3ors i.ppase ,r ( ). { L' ) establishment et an and Oefhent Plant next to - 2292 W.C.R 427 which will i I 1 -Allow scone to gig beeyy V_umkS pier lay itracior trai ers. tanrom d�arnp trucxs and cement mixers) J -. . -Allow operattors from 6700 A . .to 10:00 P.M. fe days per +wreak. " J - Allow for possible aparation 24 hours per clay. We believe this proposed use by Spy Review will iieo ti✓eiy sr,pact this rural, agricultural neignburrood by: '.ncresing traffic c;or,tlestion potential fat accidents at Hwy.a5 at Floods 6 aced 8 Interfere with local belts danger to school bus rotates ;1amage to roads,W ;C.R,#27.6.8 and)Macy.85. r.!::ryase pollution (noise, air sad dust) horn astreased traffic. -. Ff► A tP xH F-nrlr a.iiiis o Mime Address Phone Number i t1. • " .' /40 * i` .(,.,. .+.. "r2.0"_916,O':..:8..�.. r `" '� 1'f- '2 .___1:1 Le S i•i/s7/ +�'3.-•c, / ~5~i`''3 or- rt (3 ) , 7706c A LlfrLz15 cJc , :ft (? . I*5-7--6•0.x 7-- r',4 ' :L . s. WC'*,,. t3... l 2;�10 `J 4 fi, , AgetiVe}Ng. r3)f , ()`.11 '. 1 ;✓:: 1 x:..60 -- (7t =t �, ,.3 51 6,64-1 rf y CAROL Harding From Shirley Adams Gray Page 1 From: "Debbie Martin" <martin@fnb.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/9/01 10:08AM Subject: From Shirley Adams Gray As a property owner at 2631 Weld County Rd 27, I strongly oppose plans for an asphalt plant. 7,1 L,) EXHIBIT USE #'134.4 Y� /317/ 1//C' , p ?. L . / _(0 C/ /G' EXHIBIT fir,,, (1:07)/4 , i/)a,' ', i / r i s j-"U-'L CL `11'V'iJ-L'jr G; 1 rtt.LL / fi, ;Jk-Ca CI ttIill i LL/ t LLC � r ,f_-L � �_ 1l �L� � �y�� y - . .� � f L t,-141 It i - C 'c., /�. ^ P . r. /L[ rte. •.-�1F 1,.k .Z L L i �A ti I-ia LA : 3 _K, ., I,II W� t �/ -y AZ�/ ALL _ /,,:� l GGiL. LJ� Gi ,Cyr. ,L L� ,L. i62, u i .. I i_ /IJ I' , ,.. i i l Jr--Y�:i 1'i. �'.i;! jr ,[`-v,Y[J[�C'.1': ,P(.- 214 ��Cj: j ),[rI.z. ,. f l .3'7N 6Z.Ll-t2- 2- n''O.X,. L /' r-Pit 1 .. F ,Ui . X�L�2tL / t c i 1. /CC `�c 1Gl E t lC� < Lr�J-b.)_ L 'Ai /11,,.l V 1 L`c,c �L l)L )eJ. ,-Ll ,11 ILL'^ i {At? A1 � Y .;- U ,Y / lA irl I c/ uL L ' �' ? `-tip t2 l 7" _e '. - i/ r I ))) J /� Lc ' , '/:°/ l 2 1 L. ( I rA � � �� //j 1,./,' J rL r/ + i I7 ', 'y:27' '' ��,r ,� 7 t._, /7 , ;.- , -7,,m_, , 7;/7' i r-- -[ I it 2.77.7" ; 7 1N i' i.4 ?_7 ' 'Y ';',''f' l^s.'71 i:-.. -2-6,(//—, --1?'-!'1 7 CAROL Hardin Askhalt SEecialties Company permit Page 1 From: "Tim Matsuno" <tmatsuno@greenleafwholesale.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/10/01 10:41 AM Subject: Asphalt Specialties Company permit Please reject the permit from Asphalt Specialties Company to build an asphalt and concrete plant on WCR#27 on the east side 1/4 mile north of WCR #6. We are already suffering with the heavy traffic along with heavy gas and oil fracking trucks that currently travel WCR#27 daily the addition of another heavy user of the road will impact all who currently live and work on or nearWCR27. Fri I urge you to REJECT Asphalt Specialties Company request for permit!! Dwight(Tim) Matsuno Kitayama Brothers/Greenleaf 13239 WCR4 Brighton, CO 80601 �•J 1-303-659-8000 x306 CC: "Mike Deardorff' <mdeardorff@greenleafwholesale.com>, "Bob Schaffer" <rep.schaffer@mail.house.gov>, "Wayne Allard" <Allard@allard.senate.gov> usi3�y CAROL Harding Docker#2001-40 Asphalt Specialties Wm P?fie 1 From: <Rklink903@aol.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/10/01 12:14PM Subject: Docker#2001-40 Asphalt Specialties I would like to state my disapproval with a decision for a Asphalt and cement batch plant to be built off of WCR 27 and between WCR 6 and WCR 8. The safety of the people traveling the roads they would be using is all ready at high risk do to the traffic all ready there. The roads are not built to handle the traffic they allready have. The property value in the area would be decreased. E".) Does the law inforcement have the man power to keep seed limits, and code inforcements inforced ? Mary Kleinsteiber Fort Lupton, Co. 4- EX mit list i3y CAROL Harding RE: Asphalt Specialties Proposed batch asphalt{&cement plant on WCR 27 Page 1 From: <BCounterl @aol.com> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/10/01 12:19PM Subject: RE: Asphalt Specialties proposed batch asphalt& cement plant on WCR 27 Dear Sir or Madam: We do not want the above company(or any other heavy industry)to be given permission to build an asphalt and cement batch plant on WCR 27 between Roads 6 and 8. This is an agricultural area with many small farms and residential homes, and is fairly densely settled, particularly on WCR 27 where the plant intends to locate. We are opposed to this plant for the following reasons: 1). Health There is a reasonable probability that the soil and ground water in !..i the surrounding area will be polluted with chemicals and dust emitting from the plant and its operations. This is a very serious matter as all homes I in this area use shallow wells for drinking water and many fresh vegetables are ^� grown for the Denver market. It seems unthinkable that such a health hazard would be allowed with so many homes and small farms in the immediate area. 2). Safety The dense traffic on WCR 27 is already very dangerous due to the mix of tractors, cars and trucks. Adding 40 more trucks per hour(320 per 8 hour day from this plant)would create an unthinkably dangerous situation on this road. What value can be placed on the lives that will undoubtedly be lost due to this additional ponderous and very dangerous traffic. 3). Economic Loss Virtually all residences and small farms in the area would suffer from decreased property values. How will these people be compensated? 4). Nuisance The odor, dust, traffic and noise would create an unbearable situation for all those living in the surrounding area. This type of heavy, smelly, polluting industry belongs in an area zoned for heavy industry, not in a mixed residential and farming community. My family and I grew up in the Fort Lupton area, where our forefathers settled more than a century ago. This entire community has little light industry and it would be a travesty of justice to allow a heavy, smelly and polluting industry to be located there. I respectfully request that you seriously consider the above risks when you make your final decision concerning this plant and not allow it to be built. EXHIBIT CAROL Harding RE Asphalt Sypeaalties proposed batch asphalt&cementplant on WCR 27 Pale 2 Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ben T. Counter CC: <Joeshubert@aol.com> CAROL Harding Ashhalt plant near Ft Luton Colorado Page 1 From: <Kimkev4@aol.com> To: <Charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/10/01 2:47PM Subject: Ashphalt plant near Ft. Lupton, Colorado To whom it may concern, My husband and I have owned our home at 974 S. Denver Ave, Ft. Lupton, CO for 30 years. We bought out here in the country for a peasful life. The last 10 to 12 years have become more and more noisy and agravating. The traffic on Denver Avenue (Rd. 27) has become horrible. We get 20 to 30 big trucks a day going by. The sign in Ft. Lupton warns that trucks over 5000 pounds are not allowed on this road. However, the police seem to just overlook the fact that they are on the road and many times going far faster than the 40 mile an hour speed limit. With the building of the Ashphalt plant on Rd. 27 we would be overrun by more and more big trucks. We do not need it. We appeal to the authorities to black ball this project. Let them take it way out in the country somewhere where it won't disturb the lives of the people of Ft. Lupton. fl Respectfully submitted, Betty& Gideon Swick 974 S. Denver Avenue Fort Lupton, CO 80621 (303) 857-6016 4. EXHIBIT t CAROL Harding Asphalt Specialties Company Permit Page 1 From: "Carolye Johnson" <cjohnson@chisp.net> To: <charding@co.weld.co.us> Date: 7/10/01 3:37PM Subject: Asphalt Specialties Company Permit We are aware of the subject company requesting a permit to build an asphalt and concrete processing facility and plant on Weld County Rd. #27 near Road#6. We travel Road#27 several times a week and live in Country Day Estates West on the south end of Ft. Lupton. Our opinion as residents of this area is that a facility of this nature is totally unacceptable and not compatible with the existing residential areas and farms. The pollution, particultes and odors that already exist should not be increased by a facility of this nature. The traffic, congestion and pollution produced by trucks travelling to and from their destination is unsafe for residents of the area. The facility is not conducive to health of the population. We believe this permit should not be granted under any circumstances. Thank you. Vern W. Johnson and Carolye G. Johnson 213 Elizabeth Ct. Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 •--- vs < \J7 = EXHIBIT AA r il I' 1 .4),r 14 ,. ,i t '� I f f,1 $ya I -•"1, I� k� . i it i',! � � Itrip . its { t � II ' •{ �� l k� t • t J .'• , ! i f 1"R'M •1p t t i . M . �. +hhM° 4 j k t ry I t �i 7,1f; 4 t i t .ill �F ',I dr y ' t '� t r" l� k ya y �c� . I f tI — `� iii a. 1 C I OX iki 8 ._. YL t }7yn ham• y 8 dif • r+ 1 er 1 0 • ...2#1 ' L . ?II 'y • . ' „W • , .4 is •i!/} y, Y _ `.,r i 1 44 i,th , y 'yt ,...�.y! 2 ) F;�. y .t 3 -FN . 4w.1y.e ,Y� R k •340, ///'''•', Lr y t Z .c n• ' %/ • CROPS JINNI .... ttf �, � ,�h • �` .a« . it ' ' • s ' ter '`' • a ROUTE I }+.t •• , yr L,• .'ate TRUCK _ i .. _ _ _ ` riff. . I : .. • i •1 r - I sum mer PROPE1RY ``-- _ . il t M • : b 1 _ 1 x L- , , . {cat ', : , I i ,,'ii��l� EFT (q `., 46 g •f •, i .t t57, ISB SS A) F ' .Is 4 sm us xwTs � rG"ai. 1� ,` "sawrwnar,co d• K :414. tie S'''' _ : . ' 't"` I , 4 I.-., "ISMI. •wi.-s.'"•' F -• , . ,----- I'M' .' 1, PROPOSED n , t , S` 4` •it IBBUTTURR LANE 'itteeT 1 RARE._. " p A. i g.MM BNB SS TO ES YIICR S) �"'' - .�' •' .- .. + sra�trr rttatwrCa PPP 1 — t a a• . - , It.. 4 . le a S I f, + Fkli t sac a .wio norm 22 c1#4',..i, �)0 ir-, '11. 7,7.- i, } ,ti ' i t } Tarawa aarw ^ �JJJ[]j� VS ��1a"Ytta « h ,'5,A e lffet -, 172* y — e(y ,) '��•.�ty i a . 4 r '.y ��. tF s'. - t 'y t tnrT r • • I -"T.,"`• '': . 'el CAF .. s5y«. [x *, g•:j�` r rci 64' . .L,y,-utlalf "V iva:.:,.•.-•.. 1 ..---- __— _ -c≥=-s•,. .n...�ii - t_ ( (/qt2i - gcv ngittif.te, ( GPs; de1+( 4P ( 1r (' O 4c/ Lid?e.%S __. i r ti_JQJ igr7i 3,07 or t,, /7 --i_,..vi i (Th a1/4 en ni 4 CS If ��:},. a . 7 4 �' j fAt..bm..,,..--,.�..••^ ,. ...H.. _.tea ...- ..�..... .:...:. { r. • ... ,- _ �� 3 �S :, � ........„ , 4,, rg., ..:,),„.-4,,,i4„. t___+ , 4, ,f_4,..4,1 I I , ., , ,_ _.. ---.} 1 i lip i. I PEND WYOM N.J. C ) K ( \ ' : )) _ a j ....-.,_Ni' . ., I i. - 444!� TORT•LUPTON I I WELDCOUNTY GROWTH MANite Id.I AREA . Codrn�C l . '+y ; • I. . I -: ` •• i '.. .S 1.� l: .'S..t .4.. `�.''. I couwn tt J— I 1 FORT LUPTON/URBAN GR �'. I 1-4-:;:: ;, ,��' • �. • 1273(. (: : • a• t I F i ; Ii-----v--• 117. .1....../..i. •;,• l,.✓) . .,t• : ,r7:::;:•/'• u •• .il. I f NEIY W.T.P. I OS A �I '�'7�at T 0:1,<:-.,,,,-..7.47•,,r,./� ✓�4 I / co I fl'I r I-I iht y7 t% 1 ✓y J I — 1 iTn a".'�T EXISTING W.1' P. ' • 4 ✓ ,,,,,,t," •a,(' J`• " . L I cxcg ✓lam:I' I�. : r, '. FI _..� f� H •1 N L ✓ ^"�.�' v pAe .J•J ✓ 1� rt• ✓ .L 1 Weft.' _.,,,-r- I�t "�{:i -tit:, 1 CE�Fp.�[J. gl ., r J 1/ Ka; _ '" ' 1. . •..•(NN t •.r\ ` Y ` =NT',•.: a ` ORT LUP♦TON�1lj"@At1,GROW-H PLA NING A�iEA �I- a • c� a. s •, y\ ea\� I C . . :' • it f 6-5 ...:. /'f. ₹ I. i 1: �� it •LaN Yi r. L WUOa I FORT LUPTON I WELD COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT AREA • KEY n ( �m Existing City Limits l I n5 101 (//J/'/�/- ® Infill Annexation (0 to 5 years) uu W 7 4 L d El Annexation Phase I (5 to 15 years) 96.61 D-041-0 Annexation Phase II (+15 years) lI- i 7 ' a.� EXHIBIT Open Space Annexation 7 Agricultural Land No Annexation szlrf ANNEXATION BOUNDARIES FIGURE 4 r ' - a 7 - 95 • :_l_) rid if-L\ ,`r-\. 06‘1,/9-., I •1:1-• I �> l ,•� ` ' -ORT'LUPTON/WEL UNTY G 0LNT�I MANAat WENT AREA ----,----,M DOJY Rams , I I : t " '\ . k/` couNry le.e I� FORTLUPyTON URBAN,GR. . • I x i.. '%%j n� I ': ce 1 ^s+-,.;. . , . / /I/.�„' .I• .'. t.. . .I.nrIU,II II kill II II '7 t I mEua�w �aRR /:/F. - �- - ,Y nlEmairIEa DIRa ./.. '� II NEWW.LP. I •-te- r „u >. r ad¢:R¢I sHm •'/ :' • al .I I �..t ` : = �, 1 j IF--- �.rZrs- Ill ` e!a - . - / i/:l r'.: , ES:5TNGW.NT.P. -i'.'i- (I :'31 Ls.f- a�,YaWIR Eill IC's' Rp{R s a..a .C. '/ rrn rR� I aRmENJHHI IREffm E7ff ReIII e MI II 0 - 1 �y��yI FH Py c�a€c( ;VS IIIH III - i . a .. - ; { P!i) ir" g6'..g =�. aE¢I=�" R nfilE¢I EII. a ,� I -.�� I�R¢',m o E¢.EonRm x AEHEMiR , . O I S MNY5. _ r •, 7Salf / l "I IAEAlgRIa IIE Ong --3• wee� t yz: � 1x11 V. .# 01 IRQRastE:IRII I + _ _ _ / / - R IN EC anus w:EaR a _n $ a SIN IER¢1�EmIR II I 1` ,• r Ji, '� - � ,-. am'. eeaiE®gulmeo" S`' _ 4 .. _��y cpiE=K CD. l h —C II N i )au. ml. I pyEaE MACRIn p'z E Ira- /, p ! '9 is aR¢ MR IE, Ili RRitIg IC fiaa0LRa6WE- y� I r _/ 'a _ I:. I'Lm.H IG§¢3w'E 61R¢Rm RLE01E 6aE10 EM - I.;HwE'mE1PylaEaaaEmga llf IVEOrs 1 m3m�g�y BIE Mat a6 It WE L l/ ,".. _ - JE IS-aEH a NNE tali#¢@E \ e " r�: smaa ¢ta¢EaaHRIu:EII R4 N, J F WWI Ilk ICE MIS as m.slri alit '-� - - aVal' LIrE¢ MIR if amlHa El .. � 1 Iwo ` V C Un q p 1 , ... - t - i si I - fORT LUP�TON U$@AN GROWTH PLA NING AREA 11 ti ; :.f { courarmne --• 1j I. I II'. L ..I . ` . - i • t_� c.c.s:. r FORT LUPTON!WELD COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT AREA CR -7 CR29 —. n n L C7 _IL W KEY ..... - NY Industrial • Residential/Office (transitional) VA Agriculture/Industrial (transitional) n Residential ® Commercial (high density 15 to 5 units per acre) E Agricultural/Residential 23 City Central Commercial District (density 5 to 0.5 units per acre) P.:1 City or School Property(not parks) C Open Space/Parks/Agriculture -- Existing City Limits ❑ Agriculture LAND USE - large scale FIGURE 3 • MAP37 R 67 W JOINS MAP 34 CO "cvw ` '� .-. I_ c�Tfr1P ul1- HENRYR BOB 2G w RICHARD J. �� " '! o is>^ I MAYRFNE DONALD S MAGNESS w oda n, •�VOGL etol -F aw IOULS A_Fj HopE HTE a „ ,; rw o0 KrcoTA ,NCY SHIRLEY Y �a'J lOl o`t F w JENNIE A. IIELI[N P X. Jw 00Q 't. -- _ WI TE- KANZLER 0 0 o w m z IT. k„,myor it W o DaIEHo uAI_uwml _ CS o x ME -R ago u?m w2w• 10 or 02.. o I ( ,' : OLD a° Trustee �mal �J oJKW (� J ,C ue ` nLAmon, V' [C ') ,. Ow z 5 _ Nr A _ J.. - - —�'d _. `cJh-- DENNIS & 13 RICHARD J. R (�° AI FWD F us `D m v o �, --= oc scoTT l w ; v w , z vid CAROLYN / Q N & DENISE FI s s a a w rll I 1-mot x ,Hv Y, - m y,Ri JOAN M. SEE WALD w2 VOGLclot yw - „ r > "`"'- wP-CC _" L-,N1 I _ 3w 0,�y $6 BAKER Ce -- 1 SIADRANo : u-rr v 9-,:,C ¢]7= T re.;(F .mom . I F,, ac>i� J n z- a , CAROL T 1— cc( go T . oaa2 IS ' UQ z - ocn> a,r .? . a �a' Fm,� in ti. V y; � 2fm - cr�Z .:e tO en> � ,_� _ o,Q ,woae�. rexrNELL WIPERS LARRY fl rnR, wl II L �.. f V l �nN I- "- -' ` 24 HOAGL AND - c n SPRAGUE AI I IERINE C RAY B R ow.i g p IE1 JAMES V cwr MARY F coo COLORA"o`.., a MARY E DAVIS STREAR CARLSON —I CAROL mz LINO fl cc cwO ALFRED F31 KUIPERS zRrc ,r<sT«.. w Cr cwn LORRAINE FARMS CO IILHMANED - zw„I co. CO W CYE EVELYN L , 'SYLVIA etal or, cc z .EYY SATER t, -NOEHSON SE„IIAU- Wua CC EY, r� p Q DAVID V. 81 ,MCK O.O Lt I O IRICHAR „ANE�w L- \ 3 ENCHANTED JOYCE A. "E°I a Lwn I a ARCHIE ECKSTINE CONSTANCE N. HON �Nrk ui of w HILLS SUB. LEES rn HAMILTON NEAT 1 CC U Z SPRAGUE FARMERS BENNETT D .-HARNEY QUQ / Biel E /E/, K FRONT aBEATRICE w _ J a IRK. S, RANGE DEEMS f c U a w ////' CO ` GATHERING CO ,'R .InRM. _ I 1 2. '1WO rw�":o-ins "cm s�-" c _ COLE & MILDRED DUN4LD w LUPTON- In PETER B. �I T G°° I-2;1 : i _ MEADOWS IC KUGEL TEETS JIMItN MARTIN SUB-DIV 2 ulRA „ DATIL J . MAR TIN cw, \ bft_ TL = . MARY F6 — 15 11eNHv n 71 D (iC •:MARY C m i CWr Trustee elal All] III? WINDNnR Y z^2A°EL Q". CWII \\ IlEl rlll. ,J ill UAHCLAy \ C KERB 21 •.Y,gB:,, usn H,NN, (II a RO RT 8 c LAVERN & KAREN _1CARL R. £i BAWNM MANY ANN BEE C r(1nvnN l=o nREI E`. Mr' ANN STREAR JULIA A. BERNIIAN�_ KER' nusT S HAMILTON JESSE B. 0 FARMS CO. L DEEPE c%° cm B. MARY J. RoeERTL.B u N s. trustees c:i+ -if'l�lIr T- r' GRANER JANET R. �— -, H K1 1 = 3 a AIRHART T �� g" A p _ .. CKA- III J r 4 �Y= I ✓ Z O -- ------LI---- yL L CU RENE 0. GLEN R.D �i HOWARD J. STREAR SALINAS v HORTLETA L. JOHN F. sa> z a alai m. H°R ✓/ +• EDWARD A. LEONARD F2 SUSAN P COMPANY FARMS `VIDE L-w4 o� "�$ TEETS etal etol trustees '. FRANCIS SLLLA4N a! w3 • M1 I _J 7 �2 TOM LP - -' - - I� -A-..- - - IIII - •, - - - if'L R J/ l 'IfI fuflNG GLRERT 1 „q.v.. Nuvl�'1 / / / RUSSELL PHILLIP E. ' .H S Nnurzlo R Cln nl4 H S n ,n COMMON) E) a W //�� XIETT ET CAMENISCH - RESOURCES EV.NE -is $u al- ja _, RESOURCES ' VINCENT az`cm w cO xl xr v INC. oelal PARTNERSHIP I—e. Jz zw'" >-o 2 FIRESTONE # u� s.- RESOURCES sENYrT waz n' w� rco ///// / -- - _ r S ----2--7-- -_— Joxxq AURA N mxa ao 0 3 1 I, NEp UN �RMI,ENL[N �r , Q• J V EJ w R / Y ,,.CHARLES 2 KATHARIN L. 'SCOTT D. " BUr W.II , L / JOYCE M. VINCENT ROCKY �ALLEN DAVID E. SUSAN JOYCE M WY MICHAEL S. L:_3' EUGENE J. JOHNSON , eml MALLORY BUSK IRINIAKER ..B.- o :, 4 MOUNTAIN =•;, Co-uusleee BE ARSON w:' a;t_t_2 . __ KLITZ ` FUEL CO. ,--- — CIOI m,E" LnlwninP L B CKN HARRY HEI GUY D FREDERICK Etiw"RO "" Txnre" N.E. �- RJUDY A. JENSEN KEVIN sem- I x ma -{- 3-z n• DEL.CORP, IBEILMAN BERG- ma Le " s oz •L-'1 DENASEKe A LER '-al flq Nx, 'TCRc y +_ iii, VONASEK eIOI LER EWING M NOILMAN vul BT°.? xo • .n ' , + '1I CANNON w.uTf SAMUEL JN • RA CORY - ---z PAUL B D w aFRANCES GREELEY L WLK,SERVICE CO Gr COLORADO PARRS agEc wsr Esrxlx COO.' I THOMAS E.M z a NATIONAL eoo W R s, ANNE cc_ ou c FUNAKOSHI JOYCE M SUCKLA H DI4NA LEE ¢ W Z W aF-� BAsh NUNLIMER TRUST - $PURLING :wiz z -a,o„ DICKER w— a etal no FARMS,INC. aY _m2 2 N3N MRS. SAM rowN p rgEowKK W cur IAA ?E�o «o J-U a O (Ml A 1R1'(INeMI.4 11l " Oa W \Ct./, 2 N iR, fKf {L' 0 JE e 3 I — 33 3 4 -.. 5D 6„' Z_j J 'SUSAN a SUSAN J. SUSAN J TROUDT ANN 2 ma i Z TROUDT etal elal }; ANNA MAE BARK a A GRABRIAN �_ , F� TROUDT GRANT - oo� ' '�r SICKLE BERGEN HowAROJRa9az_ w �o 'rcn BROTHERS THOMAS A ASSOCIATED 1 ELAINE w F a JU a a Z a-'alt- cRRtx.K.�— tnnxsmgra__-- BINDER = Ow ay,U 2f_ DONN TRADING CO N.,V!own,w ��a' • / NMI a a 25 13 15 F1+1 19 JOINS MAP 44 2I 23 • Ylap Map 37 3 � s7/ / Y,3 L , rang. ' •� i.i Vlgid"E7 pC E +'A'i,. , 4 .' 1 IT .Two' ^,,.-. -rY..r•,R- ..S'm'1'I V"t..NIMj e " T ;0.��.. •. ''vE TF N a• �`. J, E i41. i ' Jt r}{, YN.H. lzll NW "i! Sk,� fit r'•1t4 J(T'1,M�),T1i.F't`4,: ` art '/ J Inr k? T r( N 1� lithe•; �lY�' 2,41' NL. , ,r 1 , 1 t. l (jiltIr S t t ,HI it � , 1 '1 • f • MAP38 R 66 W JOINS MAP 33 - e �• — - _ - ...Pm- THE 26 PATRICIA S'R°r"E°°"°`° CANNON GERALD D. LAND CO. DOLPH 1 I a I-m ' BLUFFS KUGEL \ir ' el 01 • 4 3 2 I BOB 1I JOHN A. SYLVIA MAGNESS KUNZ 1 KUNZMAN / etol IONE LAND CATTLE CO. ELTON 8 °AG I 2 CATHERINE per L_ .� DOVE MILLER 11 ' MEADOW DAIRY CANNON INC SAKATA LAND CO. , ROBERTS BAL`1 FARMS ''HARLEEN L.G.Bs.�1 - r • .a_ MCPEEK I I _ I GILLEN a u + HOWARD E.JR. KEN. L.aILL. CANNON KEVIN D. b BELAINE M. ARYBI D. °NL LAND CO. ' o HEATHER M. Ea se BINDER KAREN '� MILLER LFREDNLING I ? > moo WILL ARO DONNA "'""� COULTER ae=J QJm NINERe MATILDA JEAN ROBERT IT ERMAN saea u�� 4x[NMAN HANEstA. rR CARR ANITA I in MefEEK """" _ NELS a N CHAS.B JUAN - ZBK MANUEL to e CJ 85 MADGEL m SHIRLEY DIAZ CANNON —DAKOTA E. SILVA m •• CHRISTIAN- BELLJ WARNER a. CANNON SEN i LAND CO.CO el al Go LAND CO. 2w TERRY OM I co ..r I J<NCa .. BSHARON R. WW2 7 mm _ MILLER _liner 0 MOMENT - GLEN8 I 'RICH. B JOHN&� 15 LEONARD I4 ROBERTIL3 O QMI KAREN ESTHER c_.-1 z RODENTS srn mi I—I-7 WARNER 11MILT MAYER MC CRUMB C. z $Aef vk PAUL a SHIPLEY aww VIRGINIA L GARY°' KAYE i HEARTS° -Jo? TURLEY ROPER 000 `�'x et. :ee 3E et 01 - - - - a - - - - - • - - - 20 MEIN ; ee—_.••' • GLEN L. " A ""° NANSEL DONNAJ. H RICHARD I- ' ! >- PEARL0. A G. WHEELER OPAL . _ REIN zm f �m SCNMIDT o�'a e101 LONGMOUNT SYMANSKI N •E O 0I- ALFRED ' ¢` NAT'L BANK wz_ 1 a:- R. MERLEJ.B 0 0 etol 1 a o m A MARE2 ERNA a 05 4 3 • • amt B - 2�, Kna-LMULLET _ w D C Q w '° e GARY B )GARY D. B� "Aa°" TOM M.- A.M. �• 2 3= 2 W oM: p 9AN EILEEN M. ELI SURI- a ,"PICT w W mw (� 1 w v EILEEN ;I 3 3 zx �� EC .A HLADKY etOI MLADKY cm NARA+r. Al•I c ti R m O g w O Of O�1- IilcMu,osoa `o it Sa o O m 0 JAMES & WM.0. KE""J;1 G a s CC Q ]V Q Q rc op- 4 se wmx CC CC z m I- R MARY LANSDOWN COUON-• _„ O CC — w Q J • 3BG . CVL amu, ! DAMIANA elal 4TB LAR IirMi'; 'o . 2 a co -, > a xo= • 18 r mAY0 NK' 0 .ILL Ras DORA DONALD M. w 7 VERA JANE SYLVESTER MAYO HILL SALIMAN m a ? MATER 8 BADDING DAVID 0. B LUN et GI �}� � ARISTOCRAT CARL W. • SUSAN K. Mfp_ pu SHARI L. at-e, xm RONALD \RANCHES SUB—DIV RODMAN PETROL CO OWs oz VYNCKIER ,owe Do JENeS°EN �� • wmx uu Rp (� S et WM. FEHRN 21�7ANN B �+ 2 �+ALFRE°B ace DALE W. B c' I ALE JR. el al M OUEARY•SR ROSE MARIE W Q O / NOREEN M. J ox P T$H P. �_N��B_—� \ DI PAOLO >—z WING 3 Are e R SJOANNE Beo ' W z a Jz 4-'JACOBSON s----I 1~I1QJ ` }-NNE \ E t 7'G S «e�,ear} I 16 • S.J. P C DORA CUFFOflDB ""' ° " SYLVESTER STATE of ARNDT / Y SALT MAN 'ELIZABETH i oy et '� el Gl CARTER cd� Ew u BADDING COLORADO s--r . GREELEY 04 0 f'An s NATIONAL < a XCC TRACTS C JAMES A.SR. W OM W W u J /q BANK Ire m rcQ4 K a 0 w tJ I' • el el H w LA LANI F. I-uDa x? J DO RC Tx TER �� I- �r-� Fp J 0Q HARRY B 3� �LIF O fal FORT 3 3 w� 3 4 Di_ 35 -4 • MARTHA ELIZABETH A. LUPTON NORTH 2a RENNOC C, iv' °BERT J. INOUYE / PROPERTIES LLC H w w o� z "0 MUMBY V9pOKc�% ///mot"PcRNA mE CORP. ioti JJ MARCUS E'fi! RANCH ESTATES n'Msi wJcn =Iw II JANE eB.- • BBN xw Zit SHELDON '"W e"" AY A ". � Mm a � a ma = s �-lt . . . . . ._a a mm s • I4 I`51 27 29 r31 JOINS MAP 43 I33I I35i 37 in a 13 I• � a-{7 • 37 3• • M...p Mop • `/1 1/3 • T nnTv . I/l.Nrl Nv.P r•^�1-KTIYTTTe7eT"L•R ,.v.T r.-y.-n�. , n r r.,.r.,.. .. 797'.'"''.- „... q..r:nm:�'^F . I Y4-.Lir}I t '1 T n9Sr'•4.; TA;71P•'(7 errl] ifl4"F"PT . �T. r N's + J NI 1 1 J '1i,� jl>'r 111i q1 1 , • 1 '11 „7 . •As . M . e MAP 44 R 67 W JOINS MAP 37 LFE IAMU) I4 ROY 0 +WIL LI��,�,�E.B JACK •.�-• 'D Ir Nnivcr COMBINE BEveRLY veR (cnL DAR:ERA ° m ” Y VYNIX- J • 'SEY FARMS, CAR LSON 0Nl10EFi W GIT LEIPI JQ ,n co- .,''j , 'ICHA Al L. NR INC. co., DIXON,JR. TRI. "T "'ER „" J7 sz� LIta HEIN \ APTSH P. II 1 r •11 rct� w D-, O ' SWAM(M,/SHAUN IRNRRNRN - aQ 1„ , I»te,al Il 5r. lNI SORENVN Nr�aY� -T2� '�'111� �I I.111 INN E I� nL ' I C I N I I LORRAINE I RRf BI[CJR `� •Dit 4 F.,. -V . CYK \YN ' NORMANC I . ROGER ",TES, I. \ SPEAK ;� 1 N MILLER & THE RONALD el .• ,. ccwz M �CYJ Elul , L• cc J� uz_s PHILLIPS. • ICE „1 LONGMONT MACE MARGI E ¢> 2�J_ Rao CAMENISCH IROBE'T G.GM M/.r" I NAT'L. BANK tres I H • • ° a �ao2 o i I BUReE HR �m_I LAOS. 'MCI /� I al 11.111 a IS ON uN' D N 5 IW u ROBERT z MINING I ROCKY Ea z 1G. � ' I H INVESTMENT I MOUNTAIN I Ea IBURGE °'w d MAR : FRED^ Dm< 0,r rry • LARK LEE MARGA- a I C° FUEL CO. J"" oa OUW LEIN- °RULING MORT• I OWQ clot uoLL 1 O4J WEP f I 7 - 9 10 I I •"TIN J.9 • -12 I 1 MARGUERIT ORENCE M. _ MYRNA KAY 1 SUSAN J. ( DEL CORP.) SUCK LA M 5 •FER? SL�BASZCWsKl TROUDT clot 1 1 FARMS, INC. (BATSMAN MAi[Hs; LEI A Q- . ZEW9�U MYRNA KAY _ Ai A 5 ' I r ...No Es `ING I1, ii PUBLIC ANITA = SWIM NM IIIIMI wE Nov:. EUGEN, A.B.✓ t ALICE M. 1 E CO 1 JOHN L. WwsErlHl rlr 1� GADDING 1 OVER F MMIE NP ERNASTATES = CAVANAUGH DOVERS- A -$to SAL, _J -- 1Fu H A-R BERGE' a HIN Y FARMS I o� lit JR. etas WILLIAM T HAYWORTH [[ — nm MAT( OCK 1 -IIIOMA—E_ ✓� __. I a LL ,w I- ' = 1 I 'AMI 1nl _ (0 It1 WQ "-"' - - - GdIJ /,nry invnu IAN rO 'ALD9 Z I .1 JOHN C. u I VICK .1 I VA ICKA 15 I W ANTONE & I3 - ARPLNIII r,uu A' SARA ✓7 o LAURID- 1• - Z�W I LUSEFO B AFFIL ALVIN JR DGAIL A rY❑ HELEN W o '"' D. L. 81 SON LC LO �� aw =�� ■ clot THORI E _ �LAWREN RRnND rinttH MEIT RO.ENBROC ¢NF VIRGINIA TRUST I0.Ld o OQZ ■rGR; ••"KE;,"". CE M. LILLIAN R. IN^RRI GEORGE ✓? LK ,. d take J ESKIL: .EN„»EI GIRARD RANKIN S m3 3 ow cc z JOHNSON ° rtEK —) EN o w NORD" L••N o ITI- -RO%YF • "V . 2°l^ I� ✓i:,r etOl 1 Oi�`" IIV Ir ¢JI- VENGENA • ,>L -Ltl am = MiiMiiiMit ( R¢»nno s. clot ^ .,118:7" �i nG SC jGENU�VA 1 PLATT UL I JEAN CID NO.DEN —IRE MLYN 1 LAORt U F �C'N 1 PATRICK n FE D L.9 ( GEI ,r7 AUKER LAu"nL N PAULA F. .DEN �"� _ u"DEHInu MARY LEE BBINS tv r m RUTH H. 1 _ I- L. COU_GHLIN _I_ __. 0 N & OHN vi JACOBSON FORD el �nUps � eaow»c „ S WILLIAM A. TIMOTHY LLI•M E.9 ' yyHN H. B. W" L •. OW I MARTHA 1 -'`J,,."E�RRunr MA' RJ & JOANNE I PAIGE D..,'THY A. CC o� GASPAR cl"I I ". _22.INAGN - clot 2+VIRIG I a L[ FORGE G 3 TO J w RR. CAROL C.er • TONE C. I c •- - i Ewa 3,� ALVIN si<uGN- DAVID E. . B IJOHN08LY R HARSH LOUISE GEORGE W. r STIEBER etol ,y7 moo¢ I - - -- ? HEINZE I ,ER HOWARD I HELEN M. I WATTEN- J ZELLA M. v L w"ErcE HOWARD et al s, , MARRS 'RLYEE .7107) clot L:E_ HEIT 1 ,cR MILKY WAY BERG etol GEORGE W.&G EN. • ,r LALyg a\GL—ARDON TOTE ETAS Q= 1 ,'ST 'rv+� TOTEM \1 RUST ItaliaII (DAIRY R STIEBER _..f� ..TOTEMS F7 nuFn;rR, <ib I �wN. ... LL ,:^ - �� 1. JO L VIFLpiENTINO 1 f H/NOnLL ' �1� P JAMES E. ROCK KEvm ERN LTD. 1 1 p . GAMUEDA • KIRKMEYER FAMILY ;IGUNLrw PTSHP K "° i, JR Elol ms,-, PTSHP. =1 1 of IN "• 1 j1 Lk � EDWARD D. 1 "` BRUCE J ,oer '=Qj PERRY T MARTIN ";a•J �" IL G»RK SPARROW �p , SCHMIDT Rn»K _ �smg dal ./ Y IWA ER - 1 r -- • _N4 - 27 DAVID E. S �" "� 30 9CAROL C.` W - R TONI I No 1 I CAROL C. SAKA- A �"' a C. DUANE 81 IGR^"'� &DAVID E. I m DAVID E. & L ANA 8 HOWARD,L.E. ��w HOWARD - .n ip ;o1R,H"-.o, FARMS _col-a �a— BERNICE K. Io onrvM elm I >�> � l CAROL C. LARRY APTs -. ImaE, a�P JACORIICCI oar HOWARD LE. RULE `=1 -' Y" :3 KIRKMEYER r —VW" •dl!K� o�� 1 • • I 1 l ipFT l = = = = = = ..• in a • - a el � NO' - a. I Mi t= a la • '-n DUANE &BARBARA ,� I BAR I` `' RNO MSR O I LARRY L. • ,^[e;,I T r HENEMYER GRF KIRKMEYER clot MNRT»A SCHNEIDER i RULE ♦ r ':) AcoR GKu.R DAVID & CAROL I 1 CLIFFORD S. J WILMAV. BROAD- SONS FARMS GtiRUi„.° RRV GASTRIC, HOWARD 1 1 WAGNER etol 1 IRKRK-MOORS illSTRUCK ER „ INL 3I 32I -34 • 36 _CIY_-I 33 SELTZER Q AN»pJOYCE 3.. m w u 2 o �` ALBERT F »ENla . JACOBUCCI uo R �c=K ROBERT L. �� w�EL RR .L. "R'"R ( FAMILY mige -- SMI 1 SELTZER ¢u I -IOtn TRICK b1vlOL t ANNE V. PTSHP. :,-#?. i zWp qA THOMAS 1 FAMILY TRUST W�m1¢ma ' ffRNICE Le ci x cnpa DER 511 OM SACK 1 ,pa Bel Ii 1 Eru iNs i T 13 15 1171 H L21 J 1231 125 ;11,n l'a 1'1ap M `k-P la 3 3 7 5 , • • <� `i"f 4/3 I qi,' a >:r • aA ,},, ,;NREI�cITn r• R-c^.,,V I I,^mrA-'-^Rr...r .Tran , ,:.., .r.+,.. v• SLI , ,I of Y° 1 t rte' . I ;: I , a slit.; I IIr J , J IF s,ff'I'r I , ',I.:t;s ' ,'�pr'J+ld+ .; • ` J . t %tJ if!, 1. )rj eat^, I, ' . . •. +'..JJ.E,E • MAP43 R 66 W JOINS MAP 38 ODNALDM. 14 O NANCY / �/ .// ill-VI W °u°ANN TIIh000RE W a n 4 AAA VYNCKIERi�/ /�/ FAH M - m J MARY I MARY NJOANN x s « ° «" NEIN / FORT LUPTON - :" BDH11^h Dl RICHARDL `�,L r NEVA M. �T AIMS JESSER clot AMETO za n o mum-A �. ��%i%2��-25/ FARM ,r �'� II NN I h�_. , L, �a�.DN . 33 [N 5 — � w ,,,,,, ,,,,,N HWRL N:} A �� ' un n,MAIY 2 lir I IYR r AE1.SW N, nM,5 / - l u'• nN AlI_LH LIUI u uo M .I ,,,, .,. HIGHWAY 5? 'wu LIAM MAxvN MmIIMill •onJ I 61)MPAN, Mmrcl MIN IHLINKENBOLE r „AIL I WI.KIRA.I PTSHP '�M mwn,I "^ HAKE elm'4Ne L , ` ',IIIC NZ OPIII ��/ ITOM M Wal 0.III a LAIIRELL 'IDARLENFIJAMESR. R'D.B 8SPILYAN Fl) TEN , LAURELL TENNIS I_ n S A r Q[.HROL N f •� UANOL OS UMCIRVIN VAwTER r^C <I A' � IIINI.LN I EN,4,„ —,Z �P AUS➢N 1 "—►1 z RPall 12 ALICE M.e C SO Nftl In ION AWSRtl , R. / 'z PHILIP I -....,1r r' FORT uAm l r nHii n, JOHNSON TRACTS a HOLTON S / a B $ LUPTON wn Km MIKE B JIM .'o TM BMT� PINE HILL I mmENUHUG,I zx^, TRM8M JOAN R .1,. s_ m_ ENT CC E° a �`" -� WAYNER HIGHLANDS - KRUSE oW 'ate DER Uf WETRING_ i Z GABEL CD ,e)M[w.J`r NLIIf A / " I—La UZ B VERA I. ..OHAEO - Sleds I oLa Nw DA ONA ,- V 2, na WY 'GI EWEN- —'K hon It Sian, GLENN -I pz ,emu o U ING l 33? a V--_ — __.�_AN M B 9PETI R a II n 10 - I I IA OTHY MK EDNA R. , HERSCHELR SANDHAW "'"" - MARTIN z A SCOTT ENSOR eta' HEIN KELLER '"L'",";: MARTIN an LELL o CECIL W B ¢ BROS. f [kPn_ `1; mc � - -- VIRGINIA W. itNaNN >aSUB-DIV. LA sAKAT4 m EDITH A AF DDx c l�4 6 n Ono NF KING e1Dl —1"CG o to BROS. sCHMIDT SCHMIDT Der\ ' reNL4 C MILLS_ a W MARTIN a— LAND CO. PN '^F 40 SUB-Dlv. Z m le e141 OCA. a nJ PAYS- C LAGLE PN, I . tnMnoN JJ p !,n, nc 1, t1O,rltnN ,nnr Ir'/�Y JPr 0 WM FJR L SASA'• ^^"^w WU COPE mJ m i "C'- WREN( SCONEL HOWARD JR.81 M,.NLN- ya uN'm J. mom ¢., >o TAT rR, J `Fnrllr NEv B. D. PILKIN ON Q 2 OGILV'E BRIGHTON (7ZY W i _.0000A —• . • -. ELAINE FAMILY TRU T O r co,INDUSTRIAL a¢R ,_.,2 1 • CL �Y ' c NORTH I�m,n a ' e VIVIANRUSSELL06 I BINDER ' Q am eca. G.es 1 � 1 VIVIAN E. I J • $U "PAY N�Ev m, HAII$E W p Z 111 OF 17- SCOTTa PALLJ I6 THECORPOF -15 ' O 14 Z 4 13 Z L. —r vita ,/ RICHARD A. .IVA LEE N4"- PRESICIMS POSH(); 'vo ( a Fe O QA dwz BS "a.i _ o n a JOYCE K. AL- "°" OF CHURCH OF XIA. ORVAN J. 8I Ja W LEONARD A. O ds s A-Acr HUETT [ D ' JESUS CHRIST LDS as M F r Si ANN R. a>Wto [BWCRS warnDA _. RoeEaTE— [sum — ROBERT L. . MURIEL ANN I ct a a — zao VILI_ANO [NNA ARLAN F.. I 7 J ?i ROO BRANDT Z rcia ( FARMS,INC. elDl [ RENL DI, MARY ELl-1. BENNETT RODRIGUEZ 4Co ,ARTREI STAMM clot wM n .I nr — VII 1 AND n44 -0 IIANrr . ii r al C. *OMO uANN A CHARLES a WILLIAM I. COUNTRY ra's" nRRR IDA Act ❑H 1•, ItO 111,1 • .a L[ KER_ SASAKI ,,,A FARMS DA WAS C' AN,JACQUELYN '.u" C z.7 eia' 7- OM "' '„ I -Nr MAT LOCK - ESTATES ROBE' A. B GERALD A. -� JMF I'i' d SUTTON !`� MARJ: 'IE E U • >J ZIA rn tIAHVL'r w3 xa ADAMS CATTLE CO. -' w slnl ELLIO T 3 u' �o --- w r -2I--- 22- c231 24• �0 zs i `D ATADA RUTH V • osF FARMS, HAUSE imp HEINS OF IHOOI-RICK D GREE ACRES o n +,V INC. • m_° NEIL A. HOWARD A. 'MARY ANN • SEl FRANK [L UCH, rKu "RUTH A RICHARD ^v MASSEY SCOTT SUB— DIV. 0 DAMIANA {■i' R "' PUTNAM et al - • CI01 e °�C/r FRANK s'^ SOUTH_ CAROI"A. •:o .. PfEMIAoN 11 'MAMA jrF WICK SCHARA JAMES s' 95C Mn Y IC EDWARD 1 sDCM - GEO PP •_ R,^ Dr.re.e"_• I HENRY JH.B • BRANCUCG •NAY,JOE, /^ t N NnN, MELITA PERRY Y2 4 TOM SASAKI BANDL N S.O.J C. o W t-rI d 05 R t -a WULP BRA DLE A. L JOE D i 1- EN m a a BEIERLE • AGGR SASAKI a" •I'°^" _ •-w� ,n yN,> `n L,s FENS RITChIEY a e 'A,- AGGRE- NI K JOHN e 4 z] I. aziP of n.i d LAND a ARTHUR C. A LUCKY FOUR • mz GATES alai FEBOHARO HAAN%AJ r'mrc 0rk.z [Coo`Yaai V.- 400 N CATTLE BEIERLE RANCH • means .1ehL 004I L.AGNER �yg II LTD. Gooey e14 1uEWE,. L-- a '-"' _leap °Loa ,CO. eIOI /] 0101 • N 30 s we V RWINH 2` VICTORE. ink'1 28 MS Al r Asa — 2�ANTHONY R. 2 6— 25 �,>mzD I:GLADY$I DDN IYL,I RAMER DAVID A.B. Ia _.-„,Y FRANK el41 ALOMA SAMUEL a LYDIA y �oi NRAMER L n r TOMMYG.B — LEE ttOANN WENZEL iM �a� -- SANDRA E. �DJ �� __ UB—DIV TAGAWA t\ ., wum GREENLEAF DDP �/ 3(n—_ CAROLYN -i=w RRufe LAPKA SAMUEL �6 a; WHOLESALE DDM ORE I ER pc[o co—,(1w Ross- DOE GREEN- u''z 2 r r r FLORIST,INL dos ,� _ „ RAE L z —Er HARDr WENZEL IrousESJNc IY IDDJ UDE. El t.Nz . 7F ev BELTER E O TG D JAMES D& MARY LOU FRED Ft721:7 /J L Mi %^ • RJ -' BEHNICEE. MA MJ IM'JGENE JOHN W. & MILLER NARC14Y STEWARDSON HUEBNEN BEVERLY B Os? HIGHLAND T OITTMEH P,4I • > z - -- HORIZONS : S ATE �O/ a¢ SAKATA cvINCiN �- aLxE WILLARD C JI u= N FARMS B REGENE IVAN E. 81 JOAN coRP LTD. N "-�� -N PHELPS GREIN sroerl -- " - H j. • BU A PisF..1( ^ N., 35 3 I. _ q_JAGWW J �KALrs SADLER 3 3---- 3 F Z FARMS Z f 3M FAMILY / 1 1 / • 00 / wC. Az noel w LTD PTSHP FRANK xa yj� WELD U OW eN • J[so[Rsof , GLENN z rz z'•{s / • aw BRIGHTON(' ec OTTESEN a ,na COUNTY / • zl- I'≤" Bft LAR Nr"INr P M » - ASSOCIATES E • Do. 'L //� I'•:' - cm.M ACRES Trustee cN.e EJ CO ��° LTD. /ice/ //c1 ' �� 1—Cr PVrI.NV $OB-DIV GREIN_P1 -' 2 25 [2'11 1291 31 33 35 37 • map Ma-19 37 3• • • t�..:_• tit.14 MQ p • l. • T , ,.,f 1 ^•;qE''"'f�'7^. ..r...t.Iv;r.,.,tL'^;q"^"tTST!1'79•,�Iri/IV,i+lf'1i f�'Fa3�14Y^11,r,YP'' .,..-.....,..M :t^,..r..,,.,. ;7++1,�'*PN 'Y. o- 7.n,n.+rr m*#DJ,I�pRlls • �. �� 1 Proposed asphalt batch plant approved by county • planning commission An estimated 320 trucks to make daily trips from facility to HWY 85 By Sommer Everson Editor 6 a p p The Weld County Planning Commission recently ap- proved a proposal from Asphalt Specialties Company, Inc. to build a concrete and asphalt batch plant just east of WCR 27 between WCR 6 and WCR 8. The proposal, which is slated to appear before the Weld County Planning Commission in mid-July, would allow the company to operate a 14-acre facility which will consist of one asphalt plant, one concrete plant, conveyors and an office trailer. The proposed site is located one-fourth of a mile north of WCR 6 and a half mile south of WCR 8. The plant will be in operation six days a week, with a tentative schedule for processing and truck hauling from 6:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. In the application to the county, Asphalt Specialties estimates that there will be a projected 320 truck trips a day. The type of trucks includes tractor-trailers, tandem dump trucks (doubles) and cement mixers. The application said, "Access to the site will be from WCR 27,just north of the existing residence located in the southwest corner of the property."The trucks will travel to HWY 85 via WCR 6 or WCR 8. Weld County Planning Commission representa- tive Chris Ghehman said the company had agreed to pro- vide all drivers with training specific to the location. Since the proposed plant is outside of city limits, city government won't have a direct vote on the project. Howev- er, Ghehman said the surrounding municipalities, includ- ing Fort Lupton, had the opportunity to submit referrals before the Weld County Planning Commission. If passed by the commissioners, the plant could be started as early as two months after the proposal is ap- proved. r 1 I it Nll<la 1 h k^ HIT : / j ^ o o 18 f 17- ' (-- 16 \ ,� 1:1 • � -- 0 H ` / EI �I °1 / :A 1 b of I � ..\ • i 493 ern ': •-_% Wfn111y Rdli I g • 749204 , rs 1,3- V Well;T__k '�_ ! '" \a °— 1,• !�( it 4940 O j /.. /f O rainL i 7.--- C A a. i ' mli .n i np, I--- Feedbt_ i, / .Yu I �ect Well Li b a i 20 _ ! / 1/ /' 1 / 19 Pr party . 1, • it 3 T '� storage j ,_ II _Bins '.� j \ s°m p i ----11-2*- Mobile ,Pa kl t 7 dependence School ' •nWell a II Weld Cu Rd saor l 1•✓ s925ir Water 96J _ 4950 ass• 1 Tank � Rado- �- soco ! ri' ,'I ° Towe: j i i i j. 11 - I. sa5a 28• co 1 \-� `� ` `x m r O �' lil 1 / I f -ThXBon. i c r vel �pijs / im C I 'I'lR p[f' \ -C .. C--_ •1 • . 7 9115002 /Ft_. -fJ6 `•' + /( ,a➢6i .. , •.4999 '•.✓ I \cam �� . N a I i • - Scale:l'-2006 lir? "�, _ f located in Section 0 i 20,Township 1 North ' j• ' ge 66 Weser 6th P.M_Wall Ran „ ■® Banks & Gesso, LLC ViCillity Map ®® 720 Kipling, Suite 117 Weld County USR Lakewood, CO 80215 Asphalt Specialties Co.Inc. banksandgesso.com Rause Property 12/1/00 20011 x n g oa b i S . .. ,.. ; 1 ..r. I ' 5 o a O mf` t ch 4. $ „ f o ? t c r to o g) 10 M in }.,0000 •In bvs �--. lXI f •ti 5 ` V.VAy� �f_i 1�y ^'^`y^ w,r,�.w.. r _,.- 4 !1 .,,,,a..++.+•...'y:aw+"'h�` to E •y . ` u ■ w, se N (II'Milli C W t �n i m -� County commissioners.approve gravel mine II 11I I1 It o m o s County commissioners ap- Davis, who lives northeast of down there," Davis said. Com- • tUi c rr*� lc m G proved a southwest Weld Coun- the site,said he'll be sad to see missioners are requiring an 80- .12 t �g z ty gravel-mining and concrete the area change. decibel noise limit for the op- e 0 ?g C C operation Wednesday. Davis told commissioners eration, which is roughly as 9 ...• lEgi l a c o The 237-acre site is about 1.5 his family has owned nearby loud as an old dot-matrix IID KI {, miles south of Fort Lupton and land since before Colorado be- printer. O A t7 o D 'rr southwest of the intersection came a state. Hours of operation also will P� D z o , = of U.S. 85 and Weld County "My concerns are trying to be regulated. 4 Z 1 K,„._-- Road 8. keep it as pleasant as possible —JesseFanciu/ll 'Z It w a' t Asphalt production is also �•, . . V ,. i .-1- < planned for the site. Mobile i„ �% , € Pre-Mix Concrete Inc.will run , p '"' A Z- S' the operation. Z . NO a • m _ -..-----,- ---....,..r.„--4- The proposal caused few ._t...�.,. : 1t'143.u�a z.:.»Ρ Stw Atu l ---*----"4 toncerns among neia l oring F in i , }_ - property owners )John \` I ) ( / 1 t �I __J 1 I 1 nf 1 V G.. I 095/ r 1 r_ °Well 5� •1 ° ° r. �o. Lo el'.'4 --_._ --) r )0/ is /-1 O • o e ( ,0 7 } 2� ! Q 0 9 / Gravel F7 1° o '..�','jI q—' i c I I41 Wells � FfL1T ' q �1 °) o\„C., )., bC faAb141'} k I, • ( � 0 J • � k 18 he 1 U Y >91Zt \ r---- 4960" . 0 1 J _ 4954 n Rd. 8 r.i off. � r - } ,9 o •— ®J I \ N I �ti Flume 945 ..�_ \ y Ii Well 9 - o _As o 17 % ��j ° U — %m,,23 .� . 4949 • 4 19 111 °v 1 ---\-----08.- iii 0 --- ___ ° o7j \\r' t"7' 195. �— �: ••°Well 1 09_' • 1 u I r Water 49 Banks & Gesso, LLC Exhibit p 720 Kipling, Suite 117 Index Map Golden's Andesite Mining Company Lakewood, CO 80215 Lewis Sand&Gravel Mine 5/21/99 449491 i-•� �' ''_� 3 3 = • S jl i Weo= 1,l /)7,-r---T.';� ¢ ` ms`s / O / i_ :.2;1. \F� 0 0 1 " 0 \\ \yam 1 ov 46ez_ _ a Well H 1— ( _ ✓)Sa Hill 8 24 I . :!Siphon `.. c n ad18 . .. /IL . BM• 6 -dz /Siphon :<ea] .Ig867 �1:�— - 82 II .�� l ' I / i \ \ \O Ii b Y ��_��i I 01 Iice ' II d \ • moo° 1 i i o •° o-� / o ' \�-\, o II / —o of /: o 0� // /� ,' 5 3 /IY i el \ I --",- F° 2 / \ . /x rlt- : —I r ,•••"\ J .4 o o 1 \ i 1/ii i \ I I m / I _ o I/ o t I / . I I/ • ° I I � SI• on :. 4eed ;I r31 ., r ., i ' COIII I ,— •, A �1 Ib..... ---<37: \I o i o_ - 4 1 ry' Yya 'f' Y' ril DSO �_ \ \ �� / •• \V �' 4.' .`.. Pearson / ! / ,-1 /dark ' }� / l� i1 v e �, / a i °----1i i / / i. F'3 R. Il ° ° �% / I h .431 y / I 949 ' I<d93 W I I �i 3•� a jR ` 4l o \\ II Y. Si ° f , -s it r=2000• 1 cry` Banks & Gesso Exhibit B 720 Kipling, Suite 117 Index Map L.G.[aerial,Inc. Lakewood, CO 80215 Fort Lupton Sand &Gravel Mine -- •... .... Planners say no to gravel mine BY JESSE PANauul� t.6 DII --- "'`,a Greeley Tribune With nearly 850 acres of mineable property,the proposed Platte Sand& Gravel operation has potential to be a mammoth mining operation '. That's one reason officials and r 's residents who live near the 1,200- } • .\ acre site, about three miles north- west of Platteville and four mules f ? p south of opposition n,organized a mom LW.- A' ,r*S ," .4, moth ticswalked campaign A 3'; «'! c Critics walked away from the { Weld County Planning Commission meeting Tuesday with yet another - ��r - reason why they think county com- missioners should deny the project: k ,io" h, County planning commission mein t.1 ., bars voted 7-0 to deny the plans. County commissioners will have the '(p/ j final say on the plans although no t' 'l 3t heanng date has been set In the recent past,gravel pit oper- ations have been the target of criti- cism by nearby residents who often y} cite dust,noise and traffic concerns. But few,if any,recently proposed #Tg mining operations have inspired as I Al much opposition as the one pro- �'h*• posed by landowner Torn Sharkey. d .y; Historical preservation advocates, ditch company representative, area a politicians, wildlife watchers and <. even the Platteville-Gilcrest Fire dis- trict weighed in against the project. a.'1 "The major concern we have is n� the impact this will have on the envi- xTy^� ,T" ronment around Platteville" said Platteville Mayor Mike Cowper." County planners arranged to have the meeting in a larger room to accommodate the crowd they antici- pated would show up for the hear • - ing.It turned out to be a good idea: More than 55 people attended the hearing.A majorityift 30—of • them stood when asked if they were part of Platteville United Neighbors, hi-. residents'organization that oppos- es the gravel pit. .^ The Rev.Bruce Rippe,spokesman m for the group,told planning commis- sioners that members of the group aENplan I.g o mmissirn m etIng. "donated"public testimony time for Frank Stewart of Platteville,right,talks with Greeley pollee officers outsiana planning commission Ineeting. him to speak on their behalf Stewart showed up at tewart y's meeting wearing t oremin pollee-officers and carrying o bowie knife ce a.he "Well folks,these are your'scat- caliber Hawken gun.Stewart dressed In the garb to remintl commisslonere of the historic Importance of the tered rural residents,'"Rippe said, area surrounding a proposed gravel pit. referring to a photo collage that had dozens of sna shots of oearb - ".. } �?'f homes."We are a neighborhood,we ryl Y r �� dw7d.P•' �` g AT�R are a community. We understand � r. SS , 3,-. n0'4tit:,•aa that the applicant has made have g p f Weld ks *ay,y ,gat ,air!, ,•„,',..4:1t4# yo}ommi+sinn tremendous investment energy,but we �ppm -"ern ,#{ w f 3 '-"A qYi k(rygliq,A.A-- l58Mn meeting invested our time, lives, w ?'-fad m $ ,.y} v d r., f ones and hopes in the area." `) 60 p",+ f;lµ ,, f i t+ a, . i ffaft of a and of Rippe said he is worried that con T W •'+N K'J i n x d 9 fIt" r s )0001$tothe me other cerns, such as traffic noise and _ } -' '° 1 + W MtO the meeting �9 tIr I ate'r""k n groundwater issues, have not been + eItl.3G£((Wt�il area r .4i' s ; - l:gfled srch eologi a min- groundwater fully addressed by Sharkey.But rep- _�. b !.-',- i°h!vkAq'bhrleE prehaeolopieal and rpesener. s fr Sharkey and his 'row t 'e„,t, , armor, Rocky Hoffschneider of II ryi,n me gun no ammunition P.Platte Sand&Gravel,said the con- PI tteviildT. �9 aµ'wMa n,.:,,,s �^ hYrs&ey a t s Tjunl]5legun had imno ammunition cerns can be negotiated to mutual ✓` kr +3 "kK* f legptalrtltl himself to the 50 or SANUNA MACHUCAMa leyhib a0 ;7.. A I satisfaction. An engineer far the 'b 4 t a g � a hf � �� ANC Nphly con6overzlal nature applicants assured the planning nwon't mg inausbry ast dffapp is[tees.They y'sj n eS # q•A 1. t , + commissioners the operation wont also lambasted applicants for not Csaap'Lk *$' have a ifehabitat impart on water having finished a traffic report that y yk.ip,t3�s' t('y a 11."i very kdnow wus psiden tones or wildlife significant imp such as cot would show road impacts. "r k M a i.#.hlf{{S� ldonk ow the which side Cr,cpia d groves in the area.Hower, ..The fact that the applicants nave 3 „,;a I tr Ito{k you kilov!_Jesse wlltt ea claming commission members not had a traffic study I think is y ,�' , �' +Yety. observations god the data with their own inexcusable"sma planning commis 4gv £ observations about the gravel min- Sion vice chamman Mike Miller. ? ' " 'aw I'" PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEE ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. I EXHIBIT (c. days per week. I F F - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. U5(Z*f3a9 We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. °Al increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. _..._ For th s rpa ons wp nnniase this_nrnnntnir Name Address Phone Number Sle. "&a /-24"3i?' WeRv= s 3O3- 75- 7 -Ocold 3• *S5 iktyjrigh- n -3n-(n5c, -6(5R lL/o4' t? P L ` 960--,5-85 92 el 3 4J9 40T--2 2 ?47,4) 3d3 -6;9 393 c jalli 4. a (7,</* u1/4)-€,\\ x'57-ns� to tick 7%9-(/4i e^ (303) 73-9-eo y7 8 ri P Ala rf c ; 3 I1 13 v1 triad* 3© 3 - (0 5-I- 6043 4 i! litsM y 4 1e. itn 720 -ago r 5 WC /Celt FlturiM 3631-51 (0641 Name Address Phone Number eh /4 ✓ ?6s/ icie,<- ?/),, ,d4 303 8,- 7-4&Z `sue 3uo a (De R 4f Leon ?,03 { 1sS 3 q'off. (-c9c c0) 7 Fir! 3o 3 gs7 7, • t. i E of- PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. (<: days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number Jo Jc& `m. firv� i 3c.) c3 w.c, cl . ( 303 - 87 - G2(e2 3 ,. -r�44 �. -- . .1Q -- )T--�- faikmuji i ay/ WC P JO Jddidevilzos 75-9 - 5`515 , cAnS.1/2rJfn �.� 8o7-aaa 8' 7r /� • ?/12 ,-fir , ff 7 2W/jae---142- • • I Z ape(/z> Y ,Alr'©vv4 r /1/2 z ‘-.�s lir"3©9--4sT-x/66 • d6&1 13 1 �� c /C7c7/ wCe z2, 3‘8 -25?-51536 fY ,e /Si5/ 4294 /c Fis4: , I Drag-69S-7--28-56 7S' �.�T J n� . \ 55\5 \ode. k0 V-FLro14 303- es-2-x 8.59 / S , y'�1Ia Uri lb 3D3--2 -426°1 /7 „/ C≤a 7 wc�-/ D , 3o 1-Y<--7- :_.3e5"/ i ( r/�, ,- /cep7tua<- io .3 o3 F5--7-‘3R/ ci a Pi Mkt WCl2S/ 303 157 oar?„ ' q 1555 vet. 10 B(36. `.20 1 503 --FS7 -41-71S1 " e)62,12( is,Ql • /5"..5-47 J- DUCK /d 303- X557 -6o9')/ 1_1,C V r✓- Vo Aa- 13 OLvalyel 3 03- 669, 0 5,is 3 , % A..S. ,�� U l ,S&3 Lc7-d`/73 /55/i 6JPR/0 Y4/,rj I 303- 25 7-/73/ 25 1 5 L wc12 m 80(,2t ?01-857-17 ?) 010 - _ it/ o LUq?#/O 2 2 303- t3S? _ 25'62 27 jet i4 b Lae -410.0 5h a1 3CIJ - RS7 - VW a , Wa ley 790 ale, /0 206.Z/ 303 8S7 -Co?77 • , PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. (c> days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number /' Jax P z4,4frca' 53 35-LR 23, F / (3o3�d's7-a(YO 2 e& AE/n2 38x93 ( (/ 7 1:5t 2-/AD/O/4 3O3 U59--08(3 3, /3-77e 4k-'A' Al ?i4L 3o 8-4 7 2 6 y /3776 U �3 X 10 ___ Ns) 23-7 -oZbqy S CT► " " Y /4, so, 7 441 Pt ucts2,0? ) 65g - A)% 6vr _ DalAeL4 tw c)r nj2S rjt ) AtiC (563) &54 —`N7/ 7, 47/ 32_,z2 /37` --,2-e .,o5 9(1n 3gg Mho , l3 6r �94t / eit rti 396- t vh (?/ A00 )o5 ,5-?7--zfrig �0, (Gin- /936 du cchf of �_-- A goo. /2- k 7--,rC? .- -- 13 JA7 t ` ? 23-13-r,✓ZR.L (<y-V- (-2-95.- /1 -1501, rU o0t53(0 - tiqn /5- ,-.7. _,,,,,AjO z+27/C.,49- - ce'O/c (9 _‘,S--7.-/220 4 ."4:7 , itMic,,9e Ca .. 3 l C7j / A /7 lr ,/, ,.7 ?ota 4•F s'-,or? /S< 1( ,25:1-sswvc`(P 3o 3— s 3(e - `it0ba /9' c> r c>3 Jily - c,- „ Ci . 33 ) -(osC- S9 i as , t-L- a C vaa-t. CI ki4L. 30 3 c sc- r ( 4 . tpf t _ /My - -bilc,//at 3 6 .r7 ,2{ ( 7 -o ) 7-7(3<Q , `363 (c . ) .2.t( • tf2,5 i�,"7(� . 03 -65r 2a6/ .2s- ( 11963 (!t-oLec 90-8s2-Pf�— z7 vi ct,vc, MI .36.0 Elny 4j.,e 1i 0'j) 51 --)36is- .2Sf ,; ._ ... .. -7-0/.0 F Ju «I .3 <i±Dsa 30� Cosc/-25-5LA 30 d .: . .�.� /g5 T e qar j thogi37% . ?C30?55 yyr-c 34 I . ��.. Ic1Q (0 CA l VC l?i ,3-. & // q4,� 33 � � �� ; - ,IL{O \ (ii CO Ca ,30 8c-7--2SO 3y . , — 0-246r-i` Ft Levi fori , 3o , ?; 7_ c oO- ^s 4r/ S getelfi /C o rJJn Ff.60-$ ,_972a-S.-5---25- Gvt1ii.., -/-1-e-ei7` 553 S to c,e 01 i fi aerz, 30357- a /S/o Al E o /3.r7/ wcjf'/i> f L �, X03 Ste- X/X 7 a r PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks Der day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Q> days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: ' ' Name Address Phone Number _ J . 1 )), l 0 j — Gr ) ) uc/( • _3- I 7m WC-4e_ emaitim.mwassonamago " G L 3L _ k a3ae- R6 i_ /2i 4.IialetAmLstmeems.' / Y j/ I I D ck. 7 exassaassmast 0 Va .\AAA 41 LI kat ,x R 1O 3o3-5's2-,24 t1-1174-11A )eic In I ms 3/ wC-R-- /o lf . /cF(,otf I.JC. rL � ��3 ` �"z • '�.d,9L� �3d 3 � 93� (3 C^^%N//��0 e 4'- A00w4y Y/4/71il(. /cam 31 . 0 7�i _ 6 ( ho,.., f"� �, ys'o, &C2 3/ Phu orl /� I, Aye_ .303-&37-01) P Le_ ann ion f-f'or, , 'Ysoa IAir e a/ C_ 4 . . .-, Pnte -, -9-,q_ss7Gyf /co . 1 rie Pa- ,5z 0R3 FLLJ )S 7- 7 4c mg" , / 1; if if,-,, 80626 11 Eja Lu e amt_ N (o / (.i)U2/U a'Irm .Gt-!/ytiri2-e4-ar\_- ''9 e / Yh �// e to F -y,, -ry e-c I l�.( n sv- 0) a ul PI fit pi-7W 60ce - 4 � k, -Midi_,) i (•,n-iyiof z ing( . ,V9 y9 Ay , -30, -v-)1 - iS 1 z k S /37rAc,c,< Q V3-Ks7 /.S Sy,S7 &-s2-e- ,,_ 72V ,6e-t- ' , - 303 Ss- ?-- WE 5l a.S- (11f ' 1k1 . (n 5` „j -Fa .? -f5; 7 -7: 53 7 617hic line q 1 ' al, /d ,303 - 869-629 % ;V/ O -i-j . ‘2-ti e68 3 / e ./c---, ,c- aoa 303 -hr7 - 39cc il/V-2 , A,Mtlfr>Aete 3 /VI.�/ ?`1 3`�s7-{(7d' 33 'ii. aR _PS 7- 9 j/ 3 . , n )-- 9S-1 - > 322 -x 9 n dilfailli 09S-8.77 - 6a/6 --(9 iu, f7Li S, olotanear f 1 363 )S7 e a /6 4 at a07gc2. free a7 Ae 6 y-y a7 Zd r t cro-vi / Y -t WC-1k IC 'Br; Ca 10463 Sr 17;56e.„. Strom 325 D f, .1k-115},! co vbdi 37 , g mi n_ kiA u glop NCI €_.6 S-t 7y __ri l -A o(l t CO (0&a2-1 r111O-44- g IC `MC OS ?'1d�:Je y 1 e-1 191U (\Ann KJ �� 1? 01 Co doe 2 I -I V PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. (c> days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. • increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number z*4W v l 1Ms x ,61 SsQd, i. /r 9M t/f383) tars:ex3S/1 (3/y/4 it)C N /o ucA /0/7-- /_.4 .� ( '3(L3 X59 5i 3'9 I 6), kris fiLlS o Coo I 6 S te/ - /U 9. > rC NoX 35�' 3C3 - L,5q -OISass y- �a... `' fl)1OCb 0. gbh' (c4et 560 • • eF- -Lr' - t_ss -CaC.4 n'&7 7:i/r 7///:corz a E-'6ilt? - LS,4_ roe Le rw-2c'-1 \eteh: ' `motb"vd, -,,,,,t) bL° tom'%- fo-Sce 0/ ,/20 Vac/ fit ' 7'6Zo�-GSs- SO 9 Q vs1°7-t ss-�0E: u dr osi 01l7P7 ohs iSc Ite2eros _ 1 y'J'('7 0hc 2 r✓{y "'vr7, t 1' c ��}o - g' C, CC,--C -Yeir 01 ri ESP- rail(1/1-7QJ 1 -6' -Me E b / _745-42 �zr?-(:/ 9)31/5,9/ °n'Wy --z7-5,r-, 1,5-1.--$"e6 ? IGT°Cr? tez ,,t 1 % A / oohs - 4s" - 5t2—' 'DIV 'CCU'(// . / �GX7�j-_. .f. L `-`,mr!/9,� rnti�/i1/ r ---- -mss J I //SE- Lc7 -co V c-47,--(7E/ (1.O pizri ), I zca r, r Y 7I • V PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Co days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name + Address Phone Number /, 1crrL4Acru C\C jO2° S. rL.-r Le sto 3cs3 2S7 '013 2 -- lecv enot iin77 8A roe-9-off 3 I [( led /o y-4 awn lam,- 303 - es-7 -- )S-10 /m, c nittldC.J.weic , 103 83 : 3. G1 $ zGt 39 a WC (I ,77 fc' J63 - - a24 6 • .e SJoo Gc7G/? -2- T/ i 3o) - 7- 204c 7. a o — 9 GI��C v�, � Ab - 034's� la,� r• .' /-5-5? 60441 /�.>, 4.. -e, de (go,32 7-4isoz 7. 4O9i , 1- : sac(' 1 wiudid1d4 4, 30 /0 - 911>� io n . X4579i'_Fr ( -sc q CA j ) M4tt.pr..n— 3d3- 7 --'4v3( Name Address Phone Number i t. n.-rits- C, tUAc,v at . /d 3 3/ tuck ?a3- 2S1- 030"-- 1342,?.......,2<3, 4es". \\\ \ `7-- Q L-- �y 'Th --"� Flo a9 wc,C Qp -30_9- 652- Silly i5-• 13�S t 0. 1cK 1 U 30- 7 y s (7, . l6, 738/5 /v( ,' /f) ?63 ,7. 1/4,9 cae- 3,c,3 - 1e57 SzYK a%- , 6/ 973) wc,e R76 BssV / 9, i/2. 31z. 303 SS7- Ca2M0 70 • lili 11"7 of X303- acs -07 tfr 4{7o'7 CJee a9 303- FS7- "-as-7 ,2.1, '/707 W c fr # 7. o - - a -� 437A, /P S03 - 77 7 -0207 s al/ f�five er.'cyj' 303. 833. 9019 a.;. 3L 77o-3s'3 3G a�. a d r67 --- /52 d vee/c oe5 -Ps 7-07/77 22 , /3 ??o iJ(2 /o Jo3 - f57 -a/, 7 �� . fde e/ta.. /q / w e /r/(1 30 . J i'bj o Lytle # /a 303 FS7 y e6kS 3l. _.¢/ ___ Pio?, c c,, ,( do -30j-857 re)-6/ 33- , . L J /630O 6 /L C)3 - S`/ Oi5_3 3 Lit C 30 5 - lam G,ue . 3cti3- 859- a 52 �� ( k rn 8LIS S. 1) rtn,1/4) 1.... 373 X51 ov • N Po-v,--g_ N- d.1hass 34, . , y° S fib 6oc►•' -3-:33 GT7 l L PDT' 37• J <<lcte A4, v 5 ,2-4S ;7 _6 3 3}s, -e . cane* Bg of Ire,; - 303 7 -O 9i/ 39. Ica to u`. S} 303 ?S7 -O ? // yO . . 'v. 'mot..,-___-- , 3.c.,3 i '° ).S.- , I%) r5-7 - it-ter y I, (l ,u, Pac,.-, .269 14/ 8S 093j 6s-4 /Q rc/ y 2. nan, . as 4 q J1 1e,y &s - C3o._3) 65-5/- /9e v 93, Arri �.�.�,C.,._J /iz 5-7: We,e ...7,397O - 76s- e x.52_, 1 `/` 9 (l s. ?Ys" S N i%:/4 25-7 --- 9 0 7- 96, - ' , ',� I i%i.�. �' , Igo 4aa dwoy / Ft Lt9( „ , '95-7- ‘ --.1r_. I tr es-?- £7al Y-0/fre- t/I. . 5i) S,,-►, G(._rAS[.i1 - W.-)e1j ) 6 U. ,c/ 49n/IAiI ,/a o f716-O!Iti/ ,x,11 -305- 5x 33 --,2S ?2 51, 1?(a/t elt d Late/2 /2 .�; �o -776- m/6, s2. — �/6 PAL Cc�.z. .yl i-. . 7 03 - x - 2 vy( S3 , pc' tabeon- r,6-VI)led 719 4lice,,.,, , ,3o3 S-3 CO O SY. —� CC331 i/ T6' 4a G _S 5 -'7 Fr,.3 SS• ��_ !__ �,!, l7ocd., _ %7X' /ate- 303 - 8V7^ _239/Q_ • sl, i _ ///- is Ss ) 1 Wi cv ,trs .'3a i g-s 5 n c, 5> s-7. ;, � I 6 7R 8 frc 0303) 8C7-7,tc9 s-si /Le I,' . _ q t-p--4d )1 i + tye ,en . n S _ a '- J(2 4-d 4 2 , l 157 - 671.Z Go , _ _ /2 h f e h 0 757- Y,:,S 7 (DI . — 237 7. Aid gb- > - � t ?--- z &2 & CQ F M i fflv2 (P17,20.1- J/44 2574_74 �Z ctri S 3 u t csi "XL 0,4„ q)5'7- 19 sA 7 10 / / p / QcleSs .✓ dF t _ e'-6-1 - f ' s- 5� l Cr/ 2 l : pu.-c �.- Ys-t7- _ p 5'a /w3T. r06 PbmqS1 - 6 /10 tot 11 7% 73 7`I yr 7/, 77_ 7Y 7� Flo r3 -_- -=_ --POSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. M27, (old Hwy N95) ON EAST SIDE 53TWEE - ROADS 6 AND 9 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access toliaThesyy trucks wilily (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cem txers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air end dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address/O3 tj_ftnieDi Phone Number , • ;_ « /�- y z, JCtc: 2/ fr7c13 7- 621z- a pi-p K/ k2n;.$,,,,,.1<<J /i :xO3 -1'77- dii> 3• cj �r . 22Qie_.N 4ti �, 34413-5_34D-CO.52 4. _, : ,s��Li ig<L %af D -LI 3o3 - SSs7 -4ss� G . / k,c7 s7-,,f -p 3O3-.'-Gr77`)c £',. cr.:� .>;, _.,� >>-u -5/c. 2O/i/IST 7. I4� ,i=2L12 ,<i,(3 3c>_73-rJ 33-26-cil $. 1L g, /1Sr7 &c-iirotJ rfl /ro3 3c3- &c - /5/7o q . _ ? 7 r« I 9Z-39/- reds Id . ;) H — -_. /*2 k- Al,{4 1/v d., 6'c 3r 3 1-z s>-h6 3 s-- / / //�� ii/� `v. t 0hgl fir /4,, S +,aa LVu. 103- t5/ /9L6 Name} / JJ Address Phone Number hi /9/4.taL G/ fin 2 ` ,6�r�'/I,th A r fioiU Li d r A3 ST—A,✓M-� * S. cF D.r t\ _ o17 73 1( /4 / 3Cc./ 2 aVe€ /7 .1 !S. a-nc ___ 7.36 /7 a)G't77 /6, Zel )yie. 04z—�0•.— r/6- . . -K, . life-r2 _ 17 4f.--:09. , 271, -‘,,...- - (Ad c&.,---4 i1,Q..11 a iVil _,C, 6-'s 6 z. i 18. • / Sao ,60a ,a a- ve. fe, , c, . Ya6a/ 19 0-2-0 ti rC _ R 1 ,—Cs d 6.y .7 0 /. 7/.3 ,OAP c) — � Cad Ro/oi i i a_ 17/3*cQ a 71 CO St zl as n,u'«� 2 y n tuc44 . fi re6a, .t- 3 iC- ,ci loom.;.-.‘ /..1-05-1- GJ 6 id egert€4 ‘ 8-06x/ a y 1Q034 td6C2stwaf,00 i NY 15' , a 3 r - t-///- 4i��., -cd Sabo/ a 4 _ in e't; rig %r ti /, a- rte` ,d7.,.n . �� n-od / cu p aR 1. . .. 4, �I' /?36 A-CZip Colo. (1306a/ 3) ; LO ', _�`� \\a- ()alb S L If, fat, -on , (10 nor)-I as r wiz_z DR-/ sr iT 4P129/1;c &36-2/ $3 ..bpmo,a Sei d1e. 7'13 5. 2Z.2ud 4V. Rr;yk>4cw i Co S�4.2vl aq . tcr Iecidi -dig, 1VI-j -14/(if Q ) 303 655 05 W Name Address Phone Number L' Od Spc4,'✓J 9 460 [rote Dr -_ -7n1-t--5-c'o -_Qg"E4l at. "near Scow /7701E CzeiE,vu&000 b. 303 & 90 ->33 Co a7 r94- CL 2 2t9- 42 XTzaae 303_7132 -4/is as / 0236' VZ -jfL . --- --e 3_-A3_2 1-Y c�7 �'7G1 �2 b 6/ ryl 2 u T Ave/i 3° 3 . g-3 7 41. 410 "7 ' rlL/>a, //575- CzJcR 4/ Ahs , f.Ffn!. 06 V/ GUCR?7 .. if3- e S-95(9 y �--- 4 �. gfa w ✓Z Is 303 - 659- /off/ 3 �� . ate `mac'�� gaffr ( C5ff) t)y e9LM anLX Jeir77)tiv J43_1517-090 9___02_ C mistat (rit o s3=-$5-_ 1943 "a '' i? 1i`/3- `SI- L v nSo3 1/9,7_3I7 aeeLrea kacc4ct..- do . _303-5 3 b - ‘77 74 y8 f_ - /(7/ Bu,L ja_ r tau'PO_ 3_bs9-'° S _ 1� � _j:.. � _S� d''41�,r� <s9- a �.Ce 4-4i _ IYf t 57-S C a s- --tee�-� cti 3 %6' (,4, A. •i7c 4 651-s s/ olt iac s CM s+ !c .125-C1 -70-57c, 6s• Ny, A-' '610 gca-ti . r0 _ 'I3oc jbQ..,t9 co U.S - I(03 PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes _ damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: name Address Phone Number 96,144'i immee/ /CO 4AOtF////�/JJ NE, - dt3157—l0e/4 /3113i_i,x/di )144,,,71 '_ __ ^z Sq Ott . 4 c 3-- ers7.-VC Cr,,,,„„ Liida/431-z- 7 363- 41(9 Per d�_Jf,�Gr_t� Fr Po /V/G01-e ed4/f}2er?m - Jag pir_.0 r%< ci l-art.. cot, v4s� . ?- yd� AMES_ DEN_itAi , 7 4 f!C.: Kit^/tia,,, : e3 76_3 ) ��• S� ' ci2 102- Ufttlyoo ? D 97'22sj tie e L2c 19rtc w— - _2 33 2-'• - �t0-c o.p _ 3e3`§ 6 s-s--lb 23 /n'4t/ PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number 68 ao.2 l w' (P• .27 - 3-Gsy_ 21-b llvdSon bQ S. Sc on_es 2 . 0. goy. `182 °)°. 3nz- s3(, - 7 F � 30,3 - 6 g - '8 LAI liktikt, c' DZhaa ne CA2Grz�n��e�Gr� .@43- fl/- 7077 171(<._ a9'Y� �7 "- �J JO 3 -? 57 - //9G, 13 Fr- 1 Po 1So-2C //o$ L �, 303- S'57 - ) 3 t3 7C-It&Le __ y_ �zr /4 �9-7 fl 7 F /.(1.0&,-1 30.3 -S-5"9-o 3 Sy LCG21e � � /0%f cetteiectni Dattnne, — .3o 3 $3 3 h 1 IP • • / 9fsn f_ / s"'.? '-"d _ 303 6S-Y- / 777 77 �s�o tc)c /Z F- ra `° 303. IS3- ao '18 qco -=� C- S 0 3 X57 X71 Name Address Phone Number 14 , ,_) 7.1,... , c09,2 ,4. o_) SA ' 707.0 9Q9- Rns-- g'D 7 fadi ys�l_,, 7/.64 //S 3 ,3 --f5 7-/72,5- al \iI geyyp S 37th aimed- - c -wv cc 3c3 (t2Ss-9 qX(o s / Z0}c 41/4-/,/, O/it 8z1-,2 3a3 ≤36 - .3 4/ 4/ . n %((Li. , /e 3 �-C%�r.e_ /- '4�pi /4 ZG. cC e/-303/-S's -7-dae- 1 A . , !!/l�^ ,� / 16 / 7dam',44A, 62/460/ .7e& 7 1C- 4-71101 Es- Kite-) 5 TBU(,x-F-an LI-3L45 Elivbeeh` +" h ► an 303-851- i .-7 .a.___, 81v Allen E z0 S Paradz6 A,,.:0 3 -%sq - Fl- Az9Nold V, JUN t En#1 L ?ao S. Brogue 303 -fs7- 4/3OD gg• " osz 7Y5 s 7.gice.c.,y-frz4a- -303 . 857.-E ro y i ' 66,6 tJ h S±. Pfiet 4t- 303- 53(0- �//%!a a � q l t11Q /52% 604.4.¢-•. LW. os-7- 3a3- 057- /76S Z LUC2 !t S dare .363 -Ss7 -6g37 G /.� � _� f S( or` 4-72 - 0 57-1/WC- 4q /'i 6 i �1F1. Vii tm A 03- J 135-7 Name Address Phone Number Cj ' 7c4 4,7 v) 03 Golf ? % r_1. DI 57 2 cog- sit 4,1 3e)3 -b Q 3p 48 w G P,) I9 (YA? �I� �1 � 0 e.,A I Sal DJCIC a7 X303 - 59- 3 9 e?a • Name Address Phone Number ID! }ts ' ,C_ 5:51 3 Pk- 3a, . Y33 %/V& Dye 2 � /4f gt---icrii47L-(6-k. oo,t.) 303 `/ 7 0 In !Siff S w c-S-4(Co Fir TA 30.3-6 SY i 8/e PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number 16se / Wet L3 l p o aae�� F7 :fin _co 3 as ysy l �, chvo ..Y &o≤c5ki i vo a co t-{ c�-fm 303- 167 -I q ) 'insiouvkastalog �` 0 ('0 9 ro �, t_n l7 avt 303 -Es'(-^9 a7 3 09 2L2/9 tJl/lam , (47)Drl (O R©3- b50- 810 I1U 'y%D &)( ' 4(424'M J ,r4.3, 14'4'oP/ {l l - _ti _ r z s-s-6: N,ea3 _ Tc«PT�,ti .Pe& -P14-7 -C-n/1 tU, Seal gvrmng, QQ �r co 2 F��r - Th7 f/o/A/j s;✓c- �� Gla S�5 se. B(Lem j Aue. t ,J 303- g�� 7 - l9 `fo PETICION CONTRA LA FABRICA DE CEMENTO Y ASFALTO LOCALIZADO EN 2292 CONDADO DE WELD CAMINO #27 (old Highway 85) al lado este entre caminos seis y ocho Los que firman, vecinos, residentes locales, contribuyentes de impuestos y votantes se oponen al establecimiento de una fabrica de asfalto y cemento enseguida de 2292 WCR#27 que: permite acceso a 320 camiones cada dia(tractores de lo que sigue el rastro, vaciadores en tandum, y mezcladores de cemento) se les permite funcionar(horas de operation) de las seis de la manana hasta las diez de la noche seis dias a la semana posiblemente habra la posibilidad de operar las 24 horas del dia Nosotros creemos que esta propuesta revisada especialmente va a tener impacto negativo en este vecindario rural y agricultural por los siguientes razones: aglomeracion de trafico el potencial de accidentes en el camino real #85 y los caminos 6 y 8 ingerencia con trafico local peligro a las rutas de los camiones escolares deterioro de los caminos WCR 27, 6 y 8 y el camino real#85 polucion creciente (de ruido, aire y polvo) por el trafico multiplicado Por estas razones nosotros estamos en oposicion a este proposito. Nombre Direction Telefono Ole n11CISCO fi=,41nU r1D6 M<UNo(' +;lob orC0. gS 7 - 23 D2 17 '! a,\rickq crrrroc V1 3wcC6 #10025/3IIwPLYCOCO,- 3a3 E3`] -7S ? / ) Ig [/P4/ i -77 - CF ►2643 & c-RG.#lc7- -675- it 9 Uca teJ- Q&, n ai r-12 62j o) C- eC#loi fl%jH1dni.co 7'6 4YS Ci 7 G2 120 /4A)- a C14,OG ocipz 12L23wc JAG ti/oq c3 c7 7 ; /3 12) 8pa>>,5 /)i20,/ 1?673 WUz 6 it"io 303 - 75/3' i2Z e/ ay cc 7010 6 6 - 3/7‘ r-1 w / Lv4N L 4n-'23 WC 720 6255 - ?/-71] r% Name Address Phone Number 120 ,6/ 09 6 f7 o 7 Yo 0 KineHra G o?tl. 1 fb w cE () 6 37- ? / %O 3 )p (61;a-5 ✓ ( : 1-\ it cz7 i4rP sP zi? 657 op) og I12 Co '2‘ 7?wcr< 6 .2ol lag 2C, - 6 y2, ° y,go; 13D ,4423 tee,' :2„. g sYt y7 ---- ial 2�ai o Fri_s7t,P2. /2 4-23 Wcrr22S Co r A37 en /fir 13 41/4 a ia2AFc I24 ' 3wcap6Sie3o2 (ia3) Css,a6. 43 j33 tla9e1;cn 777Q°' r )%69-3 We Rn 6 Inag (720) 6gs . 983 1 0,4 cY 4, vl _Ur2 '26Z-2 LAIC►' 966- l.LI 303) `- -7 -OS A-4 31/4-C _L _cra lope-a- l.12Coa3 )ci 3/.�— 353 63 7- 0r/5_ 13 to‘ .SA.vci,pc ia64,13 wcfp .1,79 30 - Gc9 SG 93 137 6c i 4_,t7, __.2 /pGv3 (1)6 .# 3a r 77s4. q .7_ i 3 e 14 i -'k 7 47 0-o Q ≥ ,343 -o-?s--7 -CU 41 13 2 (c)��,)ez ' /1572 fi /?r- So/ s, �3zf- ��° /sv/ 3U4✓ cR 'I 36 or i1-‘ y / yl l 0 , -) ss-ry 39821,1/CE 3 / 3c ts7-0 2.CC, /42 a4., 6z ., /577 w Cie#a 3O3 -- 8(-0326 It/S oS e c -, /Sol5/ tatsahw � { le-( J 3o - �; cc-/?YG PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per clay (tractor trailers, tandem dump truck:; and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes _ damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: ,.ame Address Phone Number 8: Y t-e0D7 p ,J 73 CorYrX7/G fa7 i-F.STeri. d d'eGo3 005 G69 33/d _...- 26,73 C l2 , I iJ icy- no- 6,04,01 303 - o 33 / a _6.7716. 41-ti-gtsil °11 in, _ i2c ' _ 111�u4 y 0 Sus' f�l�� s!G/ / / (re. z7 5 *-)6a, -903 -,6, 7-_ 1'47 Rd -6-171S1 71- 14124k---- Yed 65 / c757 <� -R fln 14vileepr.in <-. 2 , -3 I- k54 rat 1-7 02 �+r ._T 3d c3 (sP-s9cro , irw /7c7z /Ale/C A 4 I _ tr .) Name -Address Phone Number 1%6• )1.:re,Po-C) 7I -' _i7,A7rcR�7 3,v7-&-I_06 el _ _ ,sfl. 4 - do-aery /74-202 ivea 6 7* •-)L5-65-5-2g-en isz. /!fil./ ,, /3k rz7c R92NA,„,,.�« A20,2 jo3 ?s?- C6s1- O3. /2l/4?'<ih _ v\ P in,-)x'1 /a2 ��?4-,' c ,c' 6 // 003 ‘->5 -? 5—s Sq . 1ss. . Lr_ ,LNL- r\cE\CZ_ ;:, (:,,:J 3 .„) ct F, (303,G:31- -a- ! •`- 15b _ tairddo Mai-olio (`J 0-3 Cu CA 6 303 6 cc_i_7-9L- 157. rof 11&,r% w • M (1623 Cu c g 6 3� 155 /? 2/ /Se. _;`_ _ 1�(®Z 7 tc>r /S IA. _ c_26 12( 2-3 wC 2 61vItMSAtC1?0 3 657 9722- - iw k!ldr- . t_ lO O O M �d5-_n7 " /4/ ___ _ L.., r / v3 S, c //pi A(/P '7- 85'7 27i /G3 _ L\, c.9-- _b SV IS,kiaLVISt1. t;c / q, tee -a1/45-,,0eng ',/- 30 -SSi c 96'x'6. _ /bc. L aSb ObitAa S7I. 303 - gS7g6sx, 14k 4.0ev7 ,V,3 4-24 Z2e-g: e X03 ,s--2_ i' 3 ,-)1- /b1. _ • ?9O Sr cow 3o 3• . 57- CZ8a 11.8 /csgn (5 hi Itn,, 3n3 l '5-. 7 - Yni3___ 169 A " /1D 2ied 'i, /aGa9 il.C_OL4 z y ;3e,s- Cost;-O6,�7 171 -211/7 A71u/Sy /270 W CAC 9 303-‘59 - 9490 1 iv '76:1110 _-;Nl car /,750 Li CQ 17 ?off ,6_c'fr-262-0 R' , PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT . . AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks per day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: �) Address Phone Number 173 Pl i el Arr -2/3 3'�S: 1�7�� 0c..? 3)- 85-7- G ?.s« nti 2lo a/3 - 3 'e° �,. =,_�uP— 301) 8S'- eY3cJ ,4,..,..,„ /7)G Ivo/ 6v.r, r2 !2 f,Zrr •. (13) ? - pack Git J- JD '7-2.20e l7� lj-�f�Cr/. &2t13/yyCr/ /� � �-�, � � 177 at F`1. g 13 WV Log 12 -R-'L ,1 3a3; 35.7-?aer 178• a 'Sart ebo vs NtrYBS FlL ys 0 j CSI-A-79 I7q £LA,J P 745„.s. &A4&. pos Yrs- (3o..08S7- c2s8a *ea. 18D ;lc.,: / I- - _ .-ter 3tca_ LI CC 2? ph 3,91i - g5L_ 67?5 181 '� a‘ �. ¢ Movie ii;c-%; 114 3o3-5n -4 l¢- !8� fi ? s s - -0^ �� 1110 ' 3O3 es-7-66-5s- . 183- e_mr6viide `i' S o...n3..--be_ kne- 303 - 3C7 - 90VD it-IA-40i N e Address Phone Number it /6:3 M C/;f.,/Cy 2 Li on ) d'37 .6 4/1-2-, as- ., eu,don I?)ti C.N. L-CCVi Ks,-t —t 7 18G l ��s 30?- 629 90% PA.aC 187 Ilq 3o3 %cl-?1 qc !SS tit( S farKA 303 -61-D7%ES It 4 Q ,t 0v,c mc>\ t t r)c i2 2( ;2,o - 8-5-7 —9(-11 MD irsto. i,/i of 303- 8.�z-boos' 14' ¢r--- 1x,2.0 3 2, IL-pi C 2.-. 3 e S - eV) •-1606 / QV J11 ( 314 61 165-159-07) 193 if f varf Rev joy f.7 23 / ' 94 ' 43C We, /2 .303- 8a7 is, • - -1( 921 t -F>I° Jos -SS7- l 194 u id-1 f d " 7 3o 3 re--c?- Leo f 147 ocit 7 ' V fo -'c- R 35 3°3- 057- 237'-j 1q7 'Afro ,t0cA 3 3e3 -0'7 ar/77 2D V' y0,0_Slsvb7 blenti 303 r33 / 41, 1 ! ) v6SL tt,4t a-c,ce 303 65 7 Yin 412/ z/ " L 1110 l4 mice Ave F. L p An 303 FS- 7- 96 8 2.) 8 1 , /emu iig, vA /6-70[07 c G 19/S7 3r-•,? 434;7 2( s/ Ad q ',Cniz) , - I f4c?5 O, C, 6 A(la_, 978 - qs._ --a(E.Z, aDdi 4 PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO ASPHALT AND CEMENT PLANT AT 2292 W.C.R. #27, (old Hwy #85) ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN ROADS 6 AND 8 The undersigned, neighbors, local residents, taxpayers and voters oppose the establishment of an Asphalt and Cement Plant next to 2292 W.C.R. #27 which will: -Allow access to 320 heavy trucks Der day (tractor trailers, tandem dump trucks and cement mixers) -Allow operations from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. six days per week. - Allow for possible operation 24 hours per day. We believe this proposed use by Special Review will negatively impact this rural, agricultural neighborhood by: increasing traffic congestion potential for accidents at Hwy. 85 at Roads 6 and 8 interfere with local traffic danger to school bus routes damage to roads, W.C.R. #27, 6, 8 and Hwy. 85. increase pollution (noise, air and dust) from increased traffic. For these reasons we oppose this proposal: Name Address Phone Number (\ip mod siedo d-1/69 / . if - /� c lam'r e r.tel✓G 70 3 - 5=57 C n/ l D . g,r 5'zI 14ovtq 0,0-e FT L• 303- 7- `!/9 3 otil ) See, ?Sin 2 Xde-o-r. 7 .c a6a-<F'57-- Y.5.3C A121 - /5�s l Gi Jos Es-7 6/ 77 X13 1;cr S 4oue7 - 4733G 02 J 7.&5--// GJc/1 / EV0-) E33-31s--/ -145 /Js%z. # y� �)(� - rash ucR 0-7 -Ritz, 3O- C7-- e r. Address Phone Number / _ e 1s/&e . _‘)a-e-56,-7r) 4 . • /3ga8VC.R 01®.9 - 6,5,n-- /.5-7.s 6 3 CJ4637 16:t ,) %3 o s w f R 503 —6.517 (5.5 6 q n a /9'/ yt/e 6 2- s Luc n yairp> .41 G. s%s canye/ ✓,hiArd I7w t 4 ri, 8 Adf r c-)/V,-,144(7 ,,o 1-V V5 337 c7 Yoe? 9 ^ / ,.104 id. 7 Ado 3ns- - 659- �7i / ,,9 l 10 mss ct ctt,„ ,o7 �1 tAL ^97 303 6s'9 - cost II (tzl_+_ c Rzl4g Lucie 67 303-6s 7Sl K el-a) 0__)_ 10X,_ L, \ -), c ,1 v LE) . 3c-2v c„ y - O aS s- /3 )35 oz ivaz (0ti 303 4Sy Zs o 4 19® ivx, 127- J43 - (Y3i - yo6 .- i -10-4_4, - IciA. -0•7y3 -503 - 6 s-, -. 46 (7 1(O c al- P0gox5,7 /3a39wce¢ 3o3 -(059- 8-coo _ 17 , 43z31 wr.,f,'-I 3o3 -fzif`j-t3f te , _- - 13A301 Iktu_ 4 303 (057 Vic' 17, - -- 1 `z3Gl wcf, Li 3°3 -6.51 - sown L It i 13239 c4cR o/ 303 . 651-8°330 A1, ` i 3.2775 ea Ai 3o3 - 6S5- gen p (a.D udnw.n. 1 3c1 U/ZR `I .533_ b57-8 oo o 13. C La, Bs* oa7- I32-3s WCz, q '3!?3 - b55 - 80oG rut yr--,-,...., V-.1 Scov I3.)39 1.sG2 }1 ?X`3 L,; 5`1-SO CA-::: I .9 3.1 out Li 303 - (0.51 • goo° ad-e-t-to-) fi irn j3a3q welly 303 f, s9- rood A7`.b i2,a39 u1/4)c-My _ (0581 -4.000 /AU ck_. __yf—a s".a'i c',^ / 3 x 3 5 c..../C.C. i 3 3 cos 9 O c 59 aint . Cc Cone- . - 4tti /39n 40 6O it g 059- yfG to r�l nw-.. eAAJLc i33-3a WtR4 '505U `;l %DU) i . ?',,`t l o« Paris Ave, 303 - 23.57_,H5.‘ r ¢ ,q' k 1 ; t Fs tjry,N'w 2 y. 1 a �w TM' i }Y a f� FF t f F .J; q z r r v a m r r a A - h 4e, a EXHIBIT G, G taeltisati , � r � "� �Mrnd� � 1 i 2 x s°"i z - P fA 3- u l 1 i t t f�vi � �9 u t ° 1'�m .y F S >• . ail 't a a�iFl v yY x,a€ s."a7s a" r•`F x, a Na x:. 1 .mss 1. .. 117$!tl L-S2 #(3a-4 -IHIBIT 6 Fort Lupton Press Wednesday, June 13 2001 6 r Y thy.. .x.. .;. .•�; r'3 4 l' 's L s (. .L aY 3� Local 7.� u 14 Colorado Coalition for Medically Underserved using public input to create insurance system that will cover everyone By Sommer Everson people were not looking for a hand- insurance. stipulate that if an individual could Editor out from the state,but a way to make A third option presented was to not provide proof, they would auto- everyone responsible for health care. provide tax incentives for purchas- matically be enrolled in a govern- While insurance companies, While participants in the sur- ing health care. Participants would ment sponsored Safety-Net plan and health care providers, and consum- vey discussed five proposed models get a tax refund at the end of the billed on a sliding scale. ers scramble to keep up with the ever for providing health care, Seward year. This plan was not overly well Though the response to the dif- rising cost of health, there is one was quick to emphasize that the ideas received because survey participants ferent options did show preferences, organization in Colorado working to were only the starting point for the felt that the refund would miss much Seward said that no one program find a way to make health care within proposed comprehensive plan. "We of the targeted population, who may "won."Instead,the ultimate outcome reach of everyone. are trying to design a system from not file taxes. Further, they ques- will probably be a mix of several The Colorado Coalition for the the bottom-up," he said. tionedwhetherpotentialparticipants plans. The results from the discus- Medically Underserved has spent the The results from the discussions would be able to invest that money sions around the Colorado communi- last year going to towns all over Colo- showed that the preferred solution up front and wait a year to get it ties can be viewed at www.ccmu.org. rado, including Fort Lupton, to talk will incorporate a single payer, but back. However,these are just the pre- to citizens to find out what they feel not necessarily a single delivery sys- The two least favored proposals liminary results. The coalition will is most important in a comprehen- tern. This concept would resemble were an employer pay or play pro- be spending the summer going over sive coverage plan for everyone. the Federal Employees Health Ben- gram and imposing a requirement the input they received, and then Over 200 people from diverse efit Plan in that everyone would be that people show proof of insurance. will be holding regional meetings with backgrounds met with coalition rep- covered under one provider—either Under the pay or play option, em- revised proposals in August and Sep- resentatives in twenty towns to dis- the government or a private entity. ployers would be required to either tember. Seward emphasized the im- cuss five proposed solutions for pro- The second favored model was offer their employees coverage portance the public input is to the viding coverage to all residents.Coa- to expand the existing programs.Un- through work or pay a fee to the success of a comprehensive health lition representative Chet Seward der this, the eligibility requirements government, who would in turn, of- care plan. He said, "Our vision is to said, "The results cut across bound- could be expanded to include people fer coverage options through a pri- have everyone have access to health aries. Coloradans want choice and who may currently make too much vately run purchasing cooperative to care. We need the public and private they want individual personal re- money to qualify for programs such employees. sectors working together to help us sponsibility." Additionally, he said as Medicaid,but cannot afford health The "proof of coverage" would get there." Semi vs car injures four Fort Lupton residents on HWY 85 • ti, # t - -- - s + . s Four people, ,y . x+ . r e „r P P e, all of Fort Lupton, were in- ras t s � � � � �� , ; jured when their car struck a semi truck on X { "' a'` * " 1 ' .m WCR 6 and HWY 85 Friday afternoon. The aeq, ,r� y ,= br a northbound semi had allegedly turned left into ' . �r g, ' t r., p; 7 1> the path of the southbound car. The southbound lane of HWY 85 was closed PA 4 ' e 1; - for Airlife, which was called for the driver, RS-0W twenty-seven-year-old Margarita Rodriguez, 1 She appeared to have suffered abdominal trauma and was flown to Denver Genera. As of --. - ,•1 Monday, she remained in critical condition e Her three passengers were transported to i� r Platte Valley Medical Center. Eighteen-year- 08 - ;y �C, _- old Yolanda Rodriguez was released from Platte r 4 s Valley Medical Center. Eleven-month-old �1 t "a a • i m Natalie Rodriguez was transferred to Children's t Hospital in Denver where she was later re- °" — ''" ` leased. Twenty-one-year-old Anna Rodriguez was flown from Platte Valley Medical Center to I , i ti t"�m� 1°« - �. Denver General with a lacerated liver and �� fractured ribs.Neither the driver or passengers p --. , , -„ were wearing seatbelts. • Dennis Wagner, 48, of Keenesburg was v x‘a:,. '" """ • • driving the semitruck and according to Colo- Photo by Bianca Prieto rado State Patrol, will probably be charged Four Fort Lupton residents were injured,two critically,when their car hit a semitruck that turned in with careless driving resulting in injuries. He front of them on HWY 85 at the WCR 6 exit.The southbound lanes of HWY 85 were closed for over was not injured. a half hour to allow Airlife to land. 4. EXHIBIT ,rrrx¢ n. AU1/492.1t 'y Saturday 'JJuly 7, 2001 Fort Lupton Press 3 1 f �N 'H5"T'h.l$� % G'5 Local Proposed asphalt and cement batch plant to Impact on truck traffic be discussed at public hearing Wednesday on WCR 6 and HWY 85 250 "Asphalt Specialties"from page 1. south to WCR 2,and onto HWY 85 through that 8, as well as the containment of noise and odor. signaled intersection. WCR 8 and WCR 6 are 200 I I Another referral letter,sent by the attorney also two possible routes to HWY 85. of a nearby land owner, also was concerned with Should WCR 6 become the road used, As- the same issues. "The noise and pollution, to- phalt Specialties projects that their facility will Number of t 50 I E gether with the increased traffic,would make the account for no more than 7.5 percent of the daily trucks objector's property less desirable. It is under- traffic, and 25.8 percent of the side road traffic i 100 stood a similar operation was refused by Adams and of the traffic from the intersection of WCR i County on the grounds stated." 6 and HWY 85 Current Total on j d WCR 6 1 l- Asphalt Specialties also tried to build in The equivalent single axle application HWY 85 an 50 Brighton. They submitted an application for a (ESAL)is used to measure the physical toll the Projected Truck conditional use permit to operate a sand and weight of vehicles has on the roads. With the Traffic from gravel mining facility and a concrete batch plant current truck projection,the project is expected Asphalt Specialties 0 in May of 2000. At the Brighton Planning to increase ESAL by 26 percent. Total Truck Traffic Northbound Southbound Commission's recommendation, "the company This project is one of several proposals to With Asphalt withdrew its request to address outstanding is- build similar facilities in a five-mile radius Specialties sues." around Fort Lupton, including cement batch One of the major concerns shared by city and mining operations, to go before the Weld *Current total based on traffic survey done June 22. officials and residents is the estimated 320 trucks County Board of Commissioners within the last running daily that will be using WCR 27 to enter two years. New/proposed sites within and exit the facility.At a Weld County Planning The majority of them have already been Commission meeting, Asphalt Specialties indi- approved. Residents have one last opportunity five-mile radius of Fort Lupton cated that fifty percent of the asphalt,cement and to be heard on the Asphalt Specialties project. dump trucks would be directed to the south on The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. at the HWY 85,with the other half going north on HWY Weld County Board of Commissioners in .. •85. Greeley. People who are unable to attend, but The access to HWr The access to 85 warranted further wish to submit comments before the hearing U co (WCR 18) discussion.Anticipated routes included WCR 27 can do so at charding@co.weld.co.us. 3 M Truck traffic on intersection of 3 ile 3 HWY 85 and WCR 6 already heavy The proposed Asphalt Specialties facilities would HWY 85 and WCR 6* HWY 85 and 136th Ave** send an estimated 300 more Fort tractor-trailers, tandem Type of truck Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Lupton dump trucks (doubles) and cement mixers on HWY 85 .. daily. The northern Adams Sand/gravel/dirt 5 13 45 44 County/southern Weld Cement 6 4 5 5 County stretch of HWY 85 Dump trucks 8 4 11 4 $ was the site of two fatalities Tanker 13 11 16 9 C involving semi trucks last Cargo 14 12 32 19 C month.One accident occurred Flatbed 13 12 26 23 Site2 .. (WCR 8) at the HWY 85/136'Ave. in- Sod 2 0 2 0 tersection and the other at Misc. 5 11 10 14 the HWY 85/WCR 6 intersec- Total 66 67 147 118 CI tion. In both cases, the ve- Total trucks 133 265 Site 1 hiclesweretravelingonHWY -t filedbyVickiSmilhandSommerEverson WCR 61 85 and struck the semi trucks * Totalsfrom June 22 between 2:55p.m.and 3:55 p.m.**Totals from July 3 between as the trucks turned. 9:30 am. and 10:30 am. Heavy truck traffic and Site 1: Asphalt Specialties fatal accidents are nothing new to either intersec- dangerous, adding up to 46 trucks on HWY 85 Site 2: Lewis Sand and Gravel Mine tion, and the projected traffic from the proposed during peak traffic times. Site 3: Fort Lupton Sand and Gravel Mine Asphalt Specialties has raised concern that the Above is a sample of how much truck traffic Site 4: Mobile Pre-Mix Concrete, Inc. additional trucks will make the highway even more HWY 85 currently handles in one hour. (gravel mine) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POS;IPIG CERTIFICATE S THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS: Nj U I I 2 M . THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENTTC AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. -I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST is DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR USR- I IA. THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: 'T (.3i\c‘%S (._. c-ki Lm a.,....... NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN IA4- - SIGNATURE FOR PERSON POSTING SIGN STATE OF COLORADO) )ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS / DAY OF9 vs_i.&. • dkAz,_ NOTARY yEILIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: q ,6'(2160 • THIS FORM SHALL BE PLACED IN THE APPROPRIATE FILE FOR THE ABOVE CASE. t, IEXHIBIT '< e MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners COLORADO FROM: Chris Gathman, Planner SUBJECT: Additional recommended conditions for USR-1324 (Asphalt Specialties) Planning Staff recommends that the following conditions of approval be added to the resolution for USR-1324: 1) (Page 7) (Item 3N): "The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the City of Fort Lupton as stated in their referral received April 18, 2001." 2) (Page 7) (Item 3O): "The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the West Adams Soil Conservation District as stated in their referral received April 20, 2001." EXHIBIT SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY L�- Listt)3aV Hello